alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
M E M O R A N D U M

DATE: September 20 , 2012

FROM: Jeanhee Hong, Assistant Regional Counsel, EPA Region 9

TO: File / Public Docket, EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2012

- 0734

RE: 9/18/12 EPA Conference Call with CVAQ re: San Joaquin Valley (SJV) air

quality issues

On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, the following people participated in a conference call to discuss air quality issues in the SJV :

EPA: Jared Blumenfeld, Zoe Heller, Kerry Drake, Mike Bandrowski, Jeanhee Hong, Frances W icher, Niloufar Glousson, Deborah Jord an, Debbie Lowe Liang , Sona Chilingaryan , Andrew Steckel

. CVAQ: Sarah Sharpe (Fresno Metro Ministry), Kevin Hamilton (Clinica Sierra Vista), Maricela Mares

- Alatorre (Greenaction/El Pueblo Para El Aire y Agua Limpio), Laura Baker, Brent Newell (CRPE), Tom Frantz (AIR), Emily Schrepf (NPCA), Rey Leon (Valley LEAP), Kevin Hall (CVAQ), Elizabeth Jonasson (Coalition for Clean Air), Paul Cort, Nike Adeyeye (Earthjustice), Katie Garvey

.
CVAQ expressed concern about EPA’s proposed rule on the 1

- hour ozone plan fo r the SJV ( 77 FR 58078, signed August 30, 2012 , published September 19, 2012) and how the proposal differed from recent proposals related to ozone plans for the South Coast

. CVAQ expressed disappointment in EPA’s proposal to withdraw the Agency’s previous approval of the SJV 1

- hour ozone plan without a simultaneous disapproval , which would start Clean Air Act sanctions clocks and requir e EPA approval of a new plan to turn off the clocks. CVAQ also expressed disappointment in the lack of direction in EPA’s proposal regarding the requirements for a new 1

- hour ozone plan

, e.g., on whether the State could rely on a “black box .”

EPA indicated that the circumstances in the South Coast are significantly different from the circumstances in the SJV. With respect to the SJV, EPA indicated the State had expressed its intent to withdraw the 1

- hour plan and that EPA would then promptly make a finding of failure to submit, which would trigger sanctions and FIP clocks . EPA also indicated that the State may submit a letter seeking to withdraw the SJV 1

- hour ozone plan before EPA’s current proposal i s finalized, in which case EPA c ould make a finding of failure to submit simultaneously with a fin al rule withdrawing EPA’s previous approval.

The agenda associated with this conference call is attached to this memorandum.
Jovon TOOMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2737

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 1101 V

UNPUBLISHED

MAURE ENA WALKER

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: December 13, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY , for P etitioner.

Jeremy Fugate , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On August 31, 2020

, Maureena Walker f iled a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving a n influenza (“flu”)

vaccine on Se p t em ber 1 0 , 201 9 . Petit ion at 1, ¶¶ 4, 25

- 26

. Petitioner further alleges that

she received the vaccine in the United States , that she suffe red the residual effects of her
SIRVA for more than six months, and that neither she nor any other individual has filed a

civil action or received compensation for her SIRVA

. Id. at ¶¶ 4, 29

- 31

. T he case was
assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material f its within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all S ection references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2

On December 10, 2021

, R espondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) R eport and Proffer

in which he concedes that P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case.
Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent has “ concluded that

[P]etitioner ’ s c laim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA

. ” Id. at 4

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q FOR
QUARTER ENDED 6/30/97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0              31,808,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0               3,944,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               1,375,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0               2,771,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0              40,063,000
<PP&E>                                               0              15,799,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               3,331,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              53,698,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               3,518,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                 111,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              46,485,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              53,698,000
<SALES>                                      2,413,000               4,446,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,413,000               4,446,000
<CGS>                                        1,917,000               3,484,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,917,000               3,484,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,108,000               4,130,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,000                 227,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,249,000)             (2,440,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,249,000)             (2,440,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,249,000)             (2,440,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)                   (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

IN RE: B.G.M., A MINOR 

PETITION OF: T.M., FATHER 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 293 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
              SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    In connection with the Annual Report of SED International Holdings, Inc
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Philip Flynt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company, and for, the periods presented in this Report.


                                                       /s/ PHILIP FLYNT
                                                --------------------------------
                                                           Philip Flynt
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 12, 2004

    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
document.


                                      28
IV 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 96 

Recognizing the historical significance of the 70th anniversary of the Miller 

v. Board of Education of District of Columbia decision. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 5, 2022 

Mr. TAKANO (for himself and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the historical significance of the 70th anniversary of the Miller v. Board of Education of District 

of Columbia decision. 

Whereas equal access to a free public education in the United 

States is a right; 

Whereas, prior to 1952, Black Deaf children in the District 

of Columbia were not permitted to attend the Kendall 

School for the Deaf on the Gallaudet College campus and 

were sent outside of the District for their education; 

Whereas Louise Burrell Miller, the mother of 4 children, 3 

of whom were deaf, filed suit in Federal court against the 

District of Columbia Board of Education on behalf of her 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HCON 96 IH 

Black Deaf son, Kenneth, and other Black Deaf children 

who were denied admission to the Kendall School, with 

the aim of ending segregation and having their Black 

Deaf children educated within the District; 

Whereas, on July 3, 1952, the United States District Court 

for the District of Columbia ruled in their favor in Miller 

v. Board of Education of District of Columbia, stating 

that African Americans could not be sent outside a State 

or district to obtain the same education that White students could have within the State or district; and 

Whereas this ruling led to the construction of the Kendall 

School Division II at Gallaudet in 1953, which educated 

23 Black Deaf children until its closure in 1954 following 

the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, in which the Court decided unanimously that racial segregation of children in public 

schools was unconstitutional: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the significance of the 70th anni4 versary of the Miller v. Board of Education of Dis5 trict of Columbia decision; 

6 (2) honors the courage and leadership of Louise 

7 and Luther Miller and their children, Kenneth, 

8 Carol, Gerald, and Justin Miller; and 

9 (3) remembers the 23 Black Deaf children who 

10 attended and the 4 teachers who taught at the seg11 regated Kendall School Division II. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1999
<CASH>                                             195
<SECURITIES>                                    19,978
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,009
<PP&E>                                          95,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,796
<SALES>                                         42,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,561
<CGS>                                           42,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,060)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,078)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    336
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,742)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.66)


</TABLE>
Timothy Andrew GAVIN v. STATE

CR-15-1402

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### People v Gast,

No. 90643;

reported below: *(On Remand)*186 Mich App 436.

Cavanagh, C.J., and Brickley, J.

We would grant leave to appeal.
Appeal Reinstated; Motion Denied and Order filed June 14 , 2013

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00825

- CV

____________ JAMES CHARLES SMITH , Appellant

V.

PIONEER HOMES BUILDE RS, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 57739

ORDER
This appeal is from a judgment signed August 28, 2012. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on August 31, 2012. Appellant filed a motion to proceed without payment of costs in this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(h). The district clerk filed

a contest. We abated the appeal and referred the matter to the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(h) (4)

. On May 13, 2013, the trial cou rt signed an order sustaining
the contest to appellant’s claim of indigence.Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 governs the procedures to establish

indigence on appeal. See Tex. R. App, P. 20.1 (West Supp. 2012). The rule requires a party claiming in digence who seeks review of the trial court’s order sustaining a contest to file her challenge “within 10 days after the order sustaining the contest is signed, or within 10 days after the notice of appeal is filed, whichever is later.” Tex. R. App. P. 2 0.1(j)(2). As of this date, appellant has not filed a motion challenging the trial court’s order.
Accordingly, appellant’s motion is denied and appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the Clerk of this court on or before Jul y 1 , 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison and Busby.
SENIOR HOME CARE, INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Donna ISABELL, an individual, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-3975

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Brandon Dakota WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1910

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Richard Samuel ALLEN v. STATE

CR-16-0082

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jonathon JACOBS, Appellant, v. Joseph Michael NACKASHI, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1


MONARCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

1801 N. Military Trail

Suite 203

Boca Raton, Florida 33431


	
 

 	
 

 	
 

 
	
(561)
391-6117 

 	
jjfn@prodigy.net 

 	
FAX: (561) 391-6187 

 
	 




April 1, 2009


VIA E-MAIL, FACSIMILE & US MAIL


Kent Curran,
President

All American Home Products, LLC

2659 NE 9th Avenue

Cape Coral, Florida 33909


          Re:     Monarch/AAHP
Merger Agreement


Dear Mr.
Curran:


          On
March 13, 2009 we sent you the attached letter which you acknowledged
receiving, but did not provide us with the status, other than you would like to
negotiate an extension. 


At our
in-person meeting on March 27, 2009 we emphasized the importance of your
immediate action on your request for an extension of time to close this
transaction. We have not received a response to our request.


          Pursuant
to Amendment No. 1 to Merger Agreement, paragraph 3, “Amendment to Section 7.1:
Termination”, the Company is notifying you that we are terminating the Merger
Agreement effective March 19, 2009, as provided for in the Merger Agreement and
Amendment No 1 to the Merger Agreement.


	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 Sincerely
 yours,

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 /s/ David Miller               

 
	
  

 	
 David Miller

 
	
  

 	
 President

 










DM/ls

enclosure


	
  

 	
  

 
	
 cc:

 	
 Todd
 Waggoner, CFO – All American Home Products

 
	
  

 	
 Andrew
 Telsey, Esq.

 
	
  

 	
 Bruce
 Rosetto, Esq.

 
	
  

 	
 Glenn B.
 Meyers, CPA

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
 Todd Waggoner,
 CFO

 
	
 All American
 Home Products, LLC

 
	
 2659 NE 9th
 Avenue

 
	
 Cape Coral,
 Florida 33909

 
	
  

 
	
 Andrew
 Telsey, Esq.

 
	
 12835 E.
 Arapahoe Road

 
	
 Tower I,
 Penthouse

 
	
 Englewood,
 CO 80112

 
	
  

 
	
 Bruce
 Rosetto, Esq.

 
	
 Greenberg
 Traurig, P.A.

 
	
 5100 Town
 Center Circle/Suite 400

 
	
 Boca Raton,
 Florida 33486
Carmus Renseler SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4300

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
____________________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2014.

An appeal from an order of the Public Employees Relations Commission.

Thomas Montgomery of Thomas Montgomery, P.A., Belle Glade, for Appellant.

Kambria Emanuel Anderson, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General 

Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Joey D. Rix, Staff Attorney, Public Employees Relations Commission, 

Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.

WARDELL COLEMAN,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-3971
EX-10.34








Exhibit
10.34



June 5,
2008




Avant Asset Management Inc.

3200 South West Freeway

Suite 2240

Houston, Texas 77027




Attention: Mr. Brick Diemer




     Re: Management Agreement Renewal


Dear Mr. Diemer:



We are writing with respect to your management agreement concerning the commodity pool to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreement through June 30, 2009 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	CTA CAPITAL LLC
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Avant Master Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Aurora III
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
 

Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Brick Diemer
 

	 	 
	Print Name: Brick Diemer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	JM/sr