alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 16 to the Incentive Savings Plan


 Exhibit 4.3.17 
 SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT TO 
 THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. 
 INCENTIVE SAVINGS PLAN 
 WHEREAS, The
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (“PNC”) sponsors The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Incentive Savings Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, Section 14.1 of the Plan authorizes PNC to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, PNC wishes to amend the Plan to provide for
the merger of the ARCS Commercial Mortgage Savings & Investment Plan into the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, effective
February 1, 2008, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. The chart in Annex III of the Plan is amended to add the following language to the
end thereof: 
  

					
	ARCS Commercial Mortgage Savings & Incentive Plan (the “ARCS Plan”)	    	February 1, 2008	  	 Withdrawal Provisions
  
 •       A Participant in the ARCS Plan may withdraw all or part of the Participant’s
rollover account in the ARCS Plan for any reason and without regard to any limit on the number of withdrawals.
  
 •       A Participant in the ARCS Plan may withdraw all or part of the Participant’s
vested accounts in the ARCS Plan at age 59 1/2 for any reason and without regard to any limit on the number of
withdrawals.


 Executed and adopted by the Chief Human Resources Officer
of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. this 25th day of February, 2008 pursuant to the authority delegated by the Corporation’s
Personnel and Compensation Committee. 
  

	
	 /s/ William E. Rosner

	William E. Rosner
	Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Consoidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Operations and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         151465
<SECURITIES>                                        0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140406
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46828
<INVENTORY>                                         0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259983
<PP&E>                                         724240
<DEPRECIATION>                                 337756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1994903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          770817
<BONDS>                                             0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                        43
<COMMON>                                       464750
<OTHER-SE>                                   65651563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1994903
<SALES>                                        252498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252498
<CGS>                                               0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               729014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (475350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (475350)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                           0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                 (475350)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.015)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.015)
<FN>
<F1> Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line item on the
     Balance Sheet or Statement of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### GrowingMontana- OneJob at

### a Time
Dock Operations M-30 West Building Ground FloorW-12-140 .1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590; 3 United StatesofAmerica Department ofTransportation Office ofSecretary Washington DC 

### RE: Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 6200 Main Street P.O. Box 1935 Colstrip, MT 59323 Phone/Fax {406) 748-2990 E-mail: semdc@bhwi.net Website: www.semdc.org

Aprill2, 2013

As ail economic development professional serving southeastern Montana, I strongly encourage the continuation ofEss.ential

### Air Service (EASl to the communities ofMiles 

### CityandLewistown. Montana. The economic base of these communities in a large state like Montana with great travel distances will be severely impacted ifpassenger air service is terminated. The increasing population and expanding business environment due to the economic growth from energy development is prevalent in every community in the EAS service area. This rapid growth is causing an increasing need for passenger 

### air service for our regional communities. Weneed EAS aspart ofoureconomic and medical services lifeline for our maturing residents. We encourage you to continue omEAS, allowingthe communities time to create an Action Plan to: * Increase passenger boarding's, * Work with the airlines to improve marketing services and *Toresearch.changes to flight times into Miles Citywhich would better fit the needs ofthe

business communitytomake connecting flights. This will allow both communities and others in our EAS service area to research how we could structure the timeliness offlights as well as consider a Denver destination for the southern most communities as part of the EAS package. Boarding's were well above minimum requirements for those southern communities with. Denver service. TerminatiOn ofservice to Miles City and Lewistown would severelyjeopardize the current EAS service to all ofthe seven EAS communities in Central andEastern Montana 

### Thank you for considering omrequest NOT to enforce the Order of Show Cause at this time and give the EAS Task Force time to work on this problem. We believe a solution to thischallenge can be found soon. Such a solution would be mutually beneficial to all parties as this region is ex;periencing one of the most active economies in the USA. Sincerely,

Jim Atchison Executive Director
August 31, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Amendment to Exemption 11426 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA 

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket 

NO. FAA-2015-0173 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

 Alaska Aerial Media LLC. was issued an Exemption numbered 11426 

(hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose of aerial cinematography 

and videography, as well as implementation of emergency use UAS systems with 

public entities. Alaska Aerial Media requests an amendment to the exemption to 

allow for altitude deviation up to 2000ft AGL for use in aerial data collection 

applications with our aircraft previously approved via our amendments. 

 

 Alaska Aerial Media LLC wishes to operate UAS systems at 2000ft 

AGL in Class G airspace with the use of LATAS software to mitigate safety 

concerns by watching manned traffic and UAS traffic while avoiding obstacles or 

collisions. Alaska Aerial Media currently conducts survey in remote locations in 

Alaska and is confident that UAS operations can reduce the risk associated with 

manned aviation. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance 

with the terms of the Exemption. 

 Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning 

this request for amendment to the Exemption. 

Sincerely, 

Ryan P. Marlow 

Alaska Aerial Media 

7960 Upper OMalley Road 

Anchorage Alaska 99507 

Tele: (907)-717-9794
a5925473ex10_9.htm


    Exhibit
10.9

    


    


    


    Mr.
Michael J. Ferrantino

    P O Box
325

    West
Harwich, MA  02671

    


    Dear
Mike:

    


    This
letter will confirm the agreement between Valpey-Fisher Corporation (the
“Company”) and you concerning the amendment of the letter agreement between the
Company and you dated September 10, 2002 (the “Letter Agreement”).

    


    The
Company and you agree that effective August 7, 2008 the last sentence of the
second paragraph on page 2 of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

    


    “Also, in
the event of the sale of Valpey-Fisher on or before December 31, 2010, you will
be paid a 2x base salary severance should you not be offered a position of
President and CEO of the new entity immediately following a sale.”

    


    Please
indicate your agreement by signing this letter in the space provided
below.

     

     

     

     

    
      
        
          
            	 
      	
                    Sincerely,

                  
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                    VALPEY-FISHER
      CORPORATION

                  
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                    By     

                  	
                    /s/ Ted Valpey, Jr.

                  
	 
      	 
      	
                    Ted
      Valpey, Jr.

                  
	 
      	 
      	
                    Chairman

                  


          

        

      

    

     

     

     

    
      AGREED AND
ACCEPTED:

      


      /s/ Michael J.
Ferrantino

      Michael J.
Ferrantino

       

       

      - 70
-
NUMBER 13-14-00357-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE HERMAN LEE KINDRED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Herman Lee Kindred, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in the above cause on June 26, 2014. Through this original proceeding, 

relator seeks to compel the trial court to provide relator with appointed appellate counsel 

and a copy of the appellate record for relator’s pending appeal in our cause number 13-

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

13-00526-CR. Relator has previously sought this same relief by motion filed in his 

pending appeal. 

To be entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must show: (1) that he has no 

adequate remedy at law, and (2) that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act. In re 

State ex rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). If 

the relator fails to meet both of these requirements, then the petition for writ of mandamus 

should be denied. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Ct. of App. at Texarkana, 236 

S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). It is relator’s burden to 

properly request and show entitlement to mandamus relief. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 

424, 426 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (“Even a pro se applicant 

for a writ of mandamus must show himself entitled to the extraordinary relief he seeks.”).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus 

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met his burden to obtain 

mandamus relief. See State ex rel. Young, 236 S.W.3d at 210. Relator has already 

sought and obtained an adequate remedy for the alleged harm through his pending 

appeal. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a).

 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

30th day of June, 2014.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1444 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1444

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 132 North Loudoun Street, Suite 1 in Winchester, Virginia, as the 
                      ``Patsy Cline Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PATSY CLINE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 132 North Loudoun Street, Suite 1 in Winchester, Virginia, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Patsy Cline Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Patsy 
Cline Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1444

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 132 North Loudoun Street, Suite 1 in Winchester, Virginia, as the 
                      ``Patsy Cline Post Office''.
```
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              State/Country of
Name                                           Incorporation       % Ownership
------------------------------------------    ----------------   ---------------
<S>                                           <C>                <C>

Flanders/CSC Corporation                      North Carolina        100.00%

Air Seal Filter Housings, Inc.                Texas                 100.00%

Precisionaire, Inc.                           Florida               100.00%

Flanders International Pte, Ltd.              Singapore             100.00%

Flanders Filters, Inc.                        North Carolina         98.86%

Airseal West, Inc.                            Utah                   80.00%

Flanders Airia Technologies, Inc.             North Carolina        100.00%

GFI, Inc.                                     Utah                  100.00%

S.R.I., Inc.                                  Utah                  100.00%

Flanders/Precisionaire Corp.                  North Carolina        100.00%

Flanders Realty Corp.                         North Carolina        100.00%

Flanders Airpure Products Company, LLC        North Carolina        100.00%(1)

Flanders Airia Technologies International     England               100.00%(2)
  Ltd.

Flanders Airpure Filter Sales and             North Carolina        100.00%
  Service, Inc.

Sierra Ridge Filter Corporation               California            100.00%

Eco-Air Products, Inc.                        California            100.00%

Industrias Seco de Tijuana, C.C.S.A. de C.V.  Mexico                100.00%(3)
_____________________
<FN>

(1) 63% owned by Flanders Filters, Inc., 37% by the Company.
(2) Owned by Flanders Airia Technologies, Inc.
(3) Owned by Eco-Air Products, Inc.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Opinion issued February 26, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-11-01029-CV

PLASTICWARE, LLC, Appellant

V.

CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1114971

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Plasticware, LLC, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of 

appellant to file brief). 
2

Appellant’s brief was first due on January 23, 2012. After being notified 

that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (authorizing dismissal for failure to file brief); 42.3(b) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss 

any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
SUCCESSION OF Bernadette Gaines GILBERT

Succession of Bernadette Gaines Gilbert

NO. 2017-C-2181

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Reconsideration denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0135

_________________

ISAAC DUPUIS,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF 

LABOR, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 

DIVISION; UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 

APPEALS BOARD,

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Molly Owen, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 27 2023

09/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0135
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11645]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that one object being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for temporary conservation and display in the exhibition “Juan de Pareja” at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is of cultural significance, and, further, that its temporary conservation and exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned are in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

      ( print page 7231)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Stacy E. White,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-02605 Filed 2-7-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Steven T. HUMPHREY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4209

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
Otis James WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2886

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Summary of Verbal Agreement for Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.25 
 Summary of Verbal Agreement for Director Compensation with William G. Adams 
 William G. Adams is a
director of Liberman Broadcasting, Inc., LBI Media Holdings, Inc. and LBI Media, Inc. (collectively, the “Companies”). Effective January 1, 2008, Mr. Adams will receive an aggregate of $7,500 in cash each fiscal quarter
for his services as a director of each of the Companies and a fee of $1,500 for each board meeting (other than telephonic meetings) he attends. However, Mr. Adams is only entitled to receive one meeting fee if the meetings of the board of
directors of the Companies are held jointly or consecutively. 
 Mr. Adams will not be paid any other compensation for his service as a
director. Mr. Adams is also reimbursed for expenses incurred in the performance of his duties as a director. 
 The Companies and
Mr. Adams have not entered into a written compensation agreement, and either the Companies or Mr. Adams may terminate their verbal compensation agreement at any time, for any reason or for no reason.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Consoidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Operations and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          41717
<SECURITIES>                                        0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  200924
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46828
<INVENTORY>                                         0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               292360
<PP&E>                                         724240
<DEPRECIATION>                                 297761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2265760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          680859
<BONDS>                                             0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                        43
<COMMON>                                       464750
<OTHER-SE>                                   65651563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2265760
<SALES>                                        140523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140523
<CGS>                                               0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               345204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (204270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (204270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                           0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                 (204270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.007)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.007)
<FN>
<F1> Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line item on the
     Balance Sheet or Statement of Operations are reported as 0 herein.</FN>
</FN>


</TABLE>