alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State v. Flint , 2017-Ohio-7806.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

CLINTON COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2016-11-020

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 9/25/2017 : CHARLES E. FLINT, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLINTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CRI16-500-158

Richard W. Moyer, Clinton County Prosecuting A ttorney, 103 East Main Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for plaintiff-appellee Richard L. Federle, Jr., 820 W illow Bend Drive, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for defendantappellant

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas , and upon the briefs of counsel. {¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Charles Flint, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates thatClinton CA2016-11-020 a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proc eedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constituti onal rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., S. POWELL and RINGLAND, JJ., concur.
#### Smith *v.*Continental Casualty Company.

Opinion delivered June 23, 1930.

*1074*Oscar II. Winn,*for appellant.

*Gockrill <& Armistead,*for appellee.

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant insists that the court erred in refusing to give numerous instructions requested by him, but they are not sufficiently identified in the motion for a new trial with objections thereto to constitute assignments of error entitled to review here. A careful examination of the instructions given by the court discloses that the charge fully declared the law, correctly directing the jury in the proper consideration of the questions and issues submitted for their determination. The jury having found upon conflicting evidence, against appellant, upon whom the burden of proof rested to show a contract or agreement made entitling him to recover, its verdict cannot be disturbed here.

The case is unlike that of *Gibson*v. *Continental Casualty Co.,*178 Ark. 1090, upon which appellant relies, the facts being altogether different. In that case the insurance company furnished its agent with forms of receipts containing blanks for stating dates when the insurance *1075should became effective, apparently authorizing him to fill in these dates and bind the company on the delivery of such receipt from the agent to the applicant for insurance. No policy was issued herein nor was any showing attempted to be made that a receipt containing any such provisions about the effective date of the policy when issued was given the applicant or any receipt at all issued to him. The burden to show the making of a contract of insurance or agreement therefor binding the insurance company to pay the amount designated was in no wise relieved against because of the difficulty thereof on account of the death of the applicant for insurance on the day his application was made, and of the agent soliciting the risk before the trial of the cause and the jury having found against appellant on conflicting evidence and the record disclosing no reversible error, the judgment must be and it is accordingly affirmed.
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 15






Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549


Dear Sirs:


We are aware that Acme Metals Incorporated has included our report dated July
25, 1997 (issued pursuant to the provisions of Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 71) in the Prospectuses constituting part of its Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-17235, 33-19437 and 33-30841) and in its Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-38747 and 33-59627).  We are also aware of our
responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.


Very truly yours,



/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
August 6, 1997

                                       21
Ronald Edward BROOKS Jr, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3665

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Marvin ACEVEDO

NO. 2018-KK-0619

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2018

Denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

      I, Russell P. Fradin, the Chief Executive Officer of The BISYS Group, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Form 10-Q of
the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q"), which
this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                                              /s/ Russell P. Fradin
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Russell P. Fradin

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

      I, James L. Fox, the Chief Financial Officer of The BISYS Group, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Form 10-Q of
the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q"), which
this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2004

                                                /s/ James L. Fox
                                                --------------------------------
                                                James L. Fox
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas E. Mara, as Chief Executive Officer of The FINOVA Group Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |             |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|----- |  | ----------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|      |  |             |  | 
|Date: |  | May 5, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas E. Mara     
|      |  |             |  |  |  |     |  | Thomas E. Mara         
|      |  |             |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,459
<INVENTORY>                                     42,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,056
<PP&E>                                          68,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,564
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,283
<SALES>                                        250,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               250,781
<CGS>                                          170,144
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,774)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,303)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,471)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,471)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 10, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1897

Lower Tribunal No. F00-10701

________________

Domonique Smith,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J. Rebull, Judge.

Domonique Smith, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. State v. Hackley, 95 So. 3d 92, 94 (Fla. 2012) (“The plain 

language of the burglary, assault, and PRR statutes leads us to conclude 

that burglary of a conveyance with an assault is a qualifying PRR offense. 

Because burglary of a conveyance with an assault is a felony that 

necessarily involves the ‘threat by word or act to do violence to the person 

of another,’ it falls within subsection (o) of the PRR statute, which covers 

‘[a]ny felony that involves the use or threat of physical force or violence 

against an individual.’” (quoting section 775.082(9)(a)1(o), Fla. Stat. 

(2006))).
**Exhibit 31**

 

**Consent of Mo Molavi**

 

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-Fof New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connectionwith, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report Feasibility Studyof the Rainy River Project, Ontario, Canada”, dated February 14, 2014, included in the Annual Information Form of New GoldInc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2014, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in theregistration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.

 

 

Dated this 27th day of March, 2015

 

 

*/s/ Mo Molavi*	

Name: 	Mo Molavi

Title: 	Mining Services Manager/Principal Mining Engineer
South Dakota National Guard 

Public Affairs Office 

2823 West Main St. 

Rapid City, S.D. 57702 

Phone 605-737-6721 

E-mail PAO@sd.ngb.army.mil

June 12, 2008 

PAO 06-12F-08 

MEDIA ALERT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Public service announcement and media invitation to participate in 

protest training 

RAPID CITY, S.D.- The South Dakota National Guard will conduct a mock protest from 

8 to 11 a.m. on Sunday, June 15, at Camp Rapid to train military police during the 2008 

Golden Coyote training exercise. 

Media are invited participate and capture this exercise. Having media present will help 

create a heightened level of stress to those military police units conducting the training. 

This event will include protest signs and role-playing demonstrators. 

The SDNG is also requesting assistance from local media to help inform the public that 

this is a mock protest and is a part of the 2008 Golden Coyote training exercise. The 

public should not be alarmed to see role-playing demonstrators in and around Camp 

Rapid. The public is encouraged to attend as spectators, and are asked to remain at a safe 

distance away from the mock protest. 

-30- 

FOR MORE INFORMATION, please contact Maj. Orson Ward at (605) 737-6721, cell 

(605) 431-8753. 

Location of South Dakota National Guard Public Affairs Office: 

2823 West Main Street 

Building 400 

Rapid City, SD 57702-8186 

(605) 737-6721 

MEDIA WISHING TO EMBED are asked to RSVP with Maj. Orson Ward at (605) 

737-6721, cell (605) 431-8753 or via E-mail at orson.ward@us.army.mil. 

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION about the South Dakota National Guard, please 

visit our Web site at https://sdguard.ngb.army.mil/default.aspx
NOTE: The South Dakota National Guard will host the annual Golden Coyote exercise 

from June 7 – 21 in the southern Black Hills. More than 4,000 service members from 92 

units representing 27 states and four foreign nations are participating in the exercise. The 

Golden Coyote exercise has been conducted for the past 24 years. The exercise provides 

relevant training opportunities in support of the war on terror and homeland defense. 

Residents should be aware of an increase in military traffic throughout the Black Hills 

and an increase in the level of noise due to military operations. Aviation activity will be 

operating out of Camp Rapid and the Army Aviation Support Facility next to the Rapid 

City Regional Airport. 

Aircraft will be primarily training on equipment and personnel transport missions as well 

as medical evacuation. Aircraft will respond to real-world emergencies during the 

exercise and remain in an all-hours-ready status during the exercise. 

Spectators to military training are welcome, however caution is warranted and spectators 

are asked to remain at a safe distance from all moving military vehicles and aircraft to 

prevent injury to personnel or damage to property.
Exhibit 21
Subsidiaries of Registrant

    Attitude 2 Travel, Inc. an Oregon corporation.

    BlowOut Video Holding Company, an Oregon corporation.

    formovies.com., an Oregon corporation.

    LRC Inc., an Oregon corporation.

    Mortco Inc., an Oregon corporation.

    Orient Link Enterprises, a foreign corporation

    PDF, Inc., an Oregon corporation.

    Rentrak Canada, a foreign corporation.

    Rentrak Europe BV, a foreign corporation.

    Rentrak UK Limited, a foreign corporation.

    RTK Kelly Limited a foreign corporation.

    Streamlined Solutions, Inc., an Oregon corporation.

    Transition Sports, Inc., a Utah Corporation.
Charlie L. STOKES, First Choice Citrus, Inc., National Indemnity Company of the South, Appellants, v. Stephanie M. ANTONICH, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2394, 5D16-2817

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 23.1
------------


       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
       ---------------------------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements Under the Securities Act of 1933 as filed by
Epicus Communications Group, Inc. (formerly Phoenix International
Industries, Inc.):

   Form S-8 dated March 20, 2000           SEC File No.: 333-32814
   Form S-8 dated Feb 1, 2001              SEC File No.: 333-54752
   Form S-8 dated April 24, 2001           SEC File No.: 333-59422
   Form S-8 dated September 28, 2001       SEC File No.: 333-70454
   Form S-8 dated May 6, 2002              SEC File No.: 333-87624
   Form S-8 dated June 27, 2003            SEC File No.: 333-106577

of our independent auditor's report dated August 21, 2003 on the
consolidated financial statements of Epicus Communications Group, Inc.
(formerly Phoenix International Industries, Inc.) and Subsidiaries as of
May 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the two years ended May 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively, which report appears in the 2003 Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of Epicus Communications Group, Inc.


                                         /s/S.W. Hatfield, CPA
                                         ----------------------------
                                         S. W. HATFIELD, CPA
Dallas, Texas
September 10, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

PETER W. MILLER, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-281

 

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent Case)

Defendant.

ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF 

ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”)

(DOC. 21); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $3,800.00 IN EAJA FEES

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint 

motion in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal Access 

to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $3,800.00. Doc. 21. Based upon the 

parties’ motion, in which they present no dispute that all requirements are met for the reasonable 

award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) GRANTS the parties’ joint motion (doc. 21); and (2) GRANTS 

Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $3,800.00. As no further matters remain pending for review, 

this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: December 17, 2019 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1403 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1403

    To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final rule 
 relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of 
   grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened 
                               wildlife.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2021

Ms. Cheney (for herself and Mr. Simpson) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final rule 
 relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of 
   grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened 
                               wildlife.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Grizzly Bear State Management Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO GREATER YELLOWSTONE 
              ECOSYSTEM POPULATION OF GRIZZLY BEARS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the final rule 
relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of 
grizzly bears from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened 
Wildlife, published on June 30, 2017 (82 Fed. Reg. 30502), without 
regard to any other provision of statute or regulation that applies to 
issuance of such rule. Such reissuance (including this section) shall 
not be subject to judicial review.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PAREXEL International
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, James F. Winschel, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: September 10, 2004               /s/ James F. Winschel, Jr.
                                        --------------------------
                                        James F. Winschel, Jr.
                                        Senior Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PAREXEL International Corporation and will be retained by PAREXEL
International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.