Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Notices 7867 

Torrey Pines Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 

89130; or fax to 775–515–5010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jamie Moeini at the above address, by 

telephone at 702–515–5129, or by email 

at jmoeini@blm.gov. Persons who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to 

contact the above individual during 

normal business hours. The FRS is 

available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 

to leave a message or question with the 

above individual. You will receive a 

reply during normal business hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The parcel 

is located south of LeBaron Avenue and 

west of Lindell Road in southwest Las 

Vegas and is legally described as: 

Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada 

T. 22 S., R. 60 E., 

Sec. 25, NE1⁄4SE1⁄4NW1⁄4. 

The area described contains 10 acres, 

according to the official plats of surveys 

on file with the BLM. 

In accordance with the R&PP Act, 

Clark County Real Property 

Management has filed an application to 

develop the above-described land as a 

public park consisting of 

premanufactured restrooms with water 

bottle fillers, eight shade structures, a 

sport/exercise equipment area, a splash 

pad, multiage playground areas, tennis/ 

pickle ball/sand volleyball/basketball 

courts, a trash enclosure, trees, planters, 

typical desert landscaping, paved 

walking trails, concrete sidewalks, street 

and park lighting, a paved parking lot, 

and utilities for direct support of the 

proposed park. The parcel is 

surrounded by private land and a fully 

developed elementary school, which is 

a previously approved R&PP project. 

Additional detailed information 

pertaining to this publication, the plan 

of development, and site plan is 

available in case file N–98610, which is 

available for review at the BLM Las 

Vegas Field Office at the above address. 

Clark County Real Property 

Management is a political subdivision of 

the State of Nevada, and is therefore a 

qualified applicant under the R&PP Act. 

Subject to limitations prescribed by 

law and regulation, prior to patent 

issuance, the holder of any right-of-way 

grant within the lease area may be given 

the opportunity to amend the right-ofway grant for conversion to a new term, 

including perpetuity, if applicable. 

The land identified is not needed for 

any Federal purpose. The lease and/or 

conveyance is consistent with the BLM 

Las Vegas Resource Management Plan 

dated October 5, 1998, and would be in 

the public interest. Clark County Real 

Property Management has not applied 

for more than the 640-acre limitation for 

public purpose uses in a year and has 

submitted a statement that its 

application is for a definite project as 

required by regulations at 43 CFR 

2741.4(b). 

The lease and conveyance, when 

issued, will be subject to the provisions 

of the R&PP Act and applicable 

regulations of the Secretary of the 

Interior, and will contain the following 

reservations to the United States: 

1. A right-of-way thereon for ditches 

or canals constructed by the authority of 

the United States, Act of August 30, 

1890 (43 U.S.C. 945); 

2. All minerals shall be reserved to 

the United States, together with the 

right to prospect for, mine, and remove 

such deposits for the same under 

applicable law and such regulations as 

the Secretary of the Interior may 

prescribe; and 

3. Any lease and conveyance will also 

be subject to valid existing rights, will 

contain any terms or conditions 

required by law (including, but not 

limited to, any terms or conditions 

required by 43 CFR 2741.4), and will 

contain an appropriate indemnification 

clause protecting the United States from 

claims arising out of the lessee’s/ 

patentee’s use, occupancy, or operations 

on the leased/patented lands. It will also 

contain any other terms and conditions 

deemed necessary and appropriate by 

the Authorized Officer. 

Upon publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, the land described 

above will be segregated from all other 

forms of appropriation under the public 

land laws, including the general mining 

laws, except for lease and conveyance 

under the R&PP Act, leasing under the 

mineral leasing laws, and disposals 

under the mineral material disposal 

laws. 

Interested parties may submit written 

comments on the suitability for 

classification of the land as a public 

park project in Clark County. Comments 

on the classification are restricted to 

whether the land is physically suited for 

the proposal, whether the use will 

maximize the future use or uses of the 

land, whether the use is consistent with 

local planning and zoning, or if the use 

is consistent with state and Federal 

programs. Interested parties may also 

submit written comments regarding the 

specific use proposed in the application, 

plan of development, and site plan, and 

whether the BLM followed proper 

administrative procedures in reaching 

the decision to lease and convey under 

the R&PP Act. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email, address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. Only written comments 

submitted to the Assistant Field 

Manager, BLM Las Vegas Field Office, 

will be considered properly filed. Any 

adverse comments will be reviewed as 

protests, by the BLM Nevada State 

Director, who may sustain, vacate, or 

modify this realty action. 

In the absence of any adverse 

comments, the decision will become 

effective on April 11, 2022. The lands 

will not be available for lease and 

conveyance until after the decision 

becomes effective. 

Authority: 43 CFR 2741.5. 

Shonna Dooman, 

Field Manager, Las Vegas Field Office. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02882 Filed 2–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1223] 

Certain Shingled Solar Modules, 

Components Thereof, and Methods for 

Manufacturing the Same ; Commission 

Determination To Review in Part and 

Remand in Part a Final Initial 

Determination Finding a Violation of 

Section 337; Schedule for Filing 

Written Submissions on Remedy, the 

Public Interest, and Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, 

on October 22, 2021, the presiding 

acting chief administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) issued a combined final initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) finding a violation 

of section 337 and a recommended 

determination (‘‘RD’’) on remedy and 

bonding in the above-captioned 

investigation. The Commission has 

determined to review the final ID in 

part. The Commission has also 

determined to remand the ID in part to 

the ALJ to make a determination 

regarding whether an on-sale bar applies 

to the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 

10,651,333 (‘‘the ’333 patent’’) based on 

alleged sales and offers for sale of 

certain products. The Commission 

requests briefing from the parties, 

interested government agencies, and 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
7868 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Notices 

interested persons on the issues of 

remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3179. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 21, 2020, the Commission 

instituted this investigation based on a 

complaint filed by The Solaria 

Corporation (‘‘Solaria’’) of Fremont, 

California. 85 FR 67010–11 (Oct. 21, 

2020). The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleges violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 1337), based on the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, or the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain shingled solar modules, 

components thereof, and methods for 

manufacturing the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 10,522,707 (‘‘the ’707 

patent’’); the ’333 patent; and 

10,763,388 (‘‘the ’388 patent’’). Id. at 

67011. The complaint further alleges 

that a domestic industry exists. Id. The 

notice of investigation named two 

respondents: Canadian Solar Inc. of 

Guelph, Ontario, Canada and Canadian 

Solar (USA) Inc. of Walnut Creek, 

California (collectively, ‘‘Canadian 

Solar’’). Id. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is not named as a party. 

Id. 

On July 15, 2021, the Commission 

determined to terminate the 

investigation as to the ’707 patent based 

on Solaria’s withdrawal of the 

allegations in the complaint as to that 

patent. Order No. 9 (June 28, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (July 15, 

2021). On October 13, 2021, the 

Commission determined to terminate 

the investigation as to asserted claims 

18–20 of the ’333 patent and asserted 

claims 6, 7, and 10 of the ’388 patent 

based on Solaria’s withdrawal of the 

allegations in the complaint as to those 

claims. Order No. 13 (Sept. 14, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Oct. 13, 

2021). 

On October 22, 2021, the ALJ issued 

the subject final ID on violation and RD 

on remedy and bonding. The ID finds 

violations of section 337 with respect to 

all asserted claims still at issue—i.e., 

asserted claims 1–5, 8, 9, 11, 15–17, 19, 

and 20 of the ’388 patent and asserted 

claims 1, 8, 9, and 12–17 of the ’333 

patent. Specifically, the ID finds that: (i) 

Solaria has standing to assert both the 

’388 and ’333 patents; (ii) the asserted 

claims of each patent are infringed and 

not invalid; (iii) the ’333 patent is not 

unenforceable due to unclean hands; 

and (iv) Solaria satisfied the technical 

and economic prongs of the domestic 

industry requirement as to both patents. 

The RD recommends that, should the 

Commission determine that violations 

of section 337 occurred, then the 

Commission should: (i) Issue a limited 

exclusion order against Canadian Solar’s 

infringing products; (ii) not issue a cease 

and desist order against Canadian Solar; 

and (iii) set a 100 percent bond for any 

importations of infringing products 

during the period of Presidential review. 

On November 5, 2021, Canadian Solar 

filed a petition for review of the ID on 

violation, including the ID’s findings 

concerning standing, claim 

construction, infringement, invalidity, 

unenforceability, and satisfaction of the 

technical prong of the domestic industry 

requirement. On November 15, 2021, 

Solaria filed a response to Canadian 

Solar’s petition. 

On November 22, 2021, Canadian 

Solar filed a notice of supplemental 

authority to inform the Commission that 

a claim construction order issued in a 

related district court litigation (‘‘district 

court order’’) involving the same parties 

and patents at issue in this 

investigation. 

On November 23, 2021, Canadian 

Solar filed a submission on the public 

interest pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(a)(4) (19 CFR 210.50(a)(4)). The 

Commission did not receive a public 

interest submission from Solaria. The 

Commission also did not receive any 

submissions on the public interest from 

members of the public in response to 

the Commission’s Federal Register 

notice. 86 FR 62845–46 (Nov. 12, 2021). 

The Commission has determined to 

review the ID in part and remand the ID 

in part. Specifically, the Commission 

has determined to review: (i) The ID’s 

construction of the claim term 

‘‘ablation’’ of the ’388 and ’333 patents 

in light of the district court order’s 

construction of that term; (ii) the ID’s 

allocation of the burden of proof 

regarding the asserted claims’ 

entitlement to claim priority to the filing 

date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 

62/349,547 (‘‘the ’547 provisional 

application’’); (iii) the ID’s finding that 

claim 19 of the ’388 patent and claim 8 

of the ’333 patent find written 

description support in the ’547 

provisional application; (iv) the ID’s 

findings on validity for the ’388 patent; 

and (v) the ID’s finding concerning 

secondary considerations with respect 

to the ’333 patent. The Commission has 

determined to remand the ID to the ALJ 

to address, in the first instance, 

Canadian Solar’s on-sale bar defenses as 

to the asserted claims of the ’333 patent 

based on alleged sales and offers for sale 

of Solaria’s BIPV and GIPV products. 

The Commission has also determined to 

correct one typographical error on page 

48 of the ID. The Commission has 

determined not to review the remaining 

findings in the ID. 

In connection with its review, the 

Commission requests responses to the 

following questions. The parties are 

requested to brief their positions with 

reference to the applicable law and the 

existing evidentiary record. 

(1) Explain the proper allocation of 

burdens in the context of showing a 

patentee’s entitlement to rely on a 

parent application to avoid prior art. See 

ID at 62 (citing Tech. Licensing Corp. v. 

Videotek, Inc., 545 F.3d 1316, 1327–28 

(Fed. Cir. 2008)). 

(2) Explain whether claim 19 of the 

’388 patent and claim 8 of the ’333 

patent find written description support 

in the ’547 provisional application. 

Provide any citations to the record that 

support your contention. 

(3) Identify each product-by-process 

limitation recited in the asserted claims 

of the ’388 patent (e.g., ‘‘cut by an 

ablation from multiple passes of a laser 

beam’’) and explain whether each such 

limitation should be accorded 

patentable weight in the validity 

analysis of the claims at issue. 

The parties are not to brief other 

issues on review, which are adequately 

presented in the parties’ existing filings. 

In connection with the final 

disposition of this investigation, the 

statute authorizes issuance of: (1) An 

exclusion order that could result in the 

exclusion of the subject articles from 

entry into the United States, and/or (2) 

a cease and desist order that could 

result in the respondents being required 

to cease and desist from engaging in 

unfair acts in the importation and sale 

of such articles. Accordingly, the 

Commission is interested in receiving 

written submissions that address the 

form of remedy, if any, that should be 

ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an 

article from entry into the United States 

for purposes other than entry for 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Notices 7869 

consumption, the party should so 

indicate and provide information 

establishing that activities involving 

other types of entry either are adversely 

affecting it or likely to do so. For 

background, see Certain Devices for 

Connecting Computers via Telephone 

Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC 

Pub. No. 2843, Comm’n Op. at 7–10 

(December 1994). 

The statute requires the Commission 

to consider the effects of any remedy 

upon the public interest. The public 

interest factors the Commission will 

consider include the effect that an 

exclusion order and/or cease and desist 

order would have on: (1) The public 

health and welfare; (2) competitive 

conditions in the U.S. economy; (3) U.S. 

production of articles that are like or 

directly competitive with those that are 

subject to investigation; and (4) U.S. 

consumers. The Commission is 

therefore interested in receiving written 

submissions that address the 

aforementioned public interest factors 

in the context of this investigation. 

The Commission requests full briefing 

on the public interest, setting forth a 

complete and fulsome discussion of 

whether exclusion of the accused 

products would have an effect on each 

public interest factor and providing 

evidence to substantiate factual 

assertions. Within the context of the 

applicable public interest factor, please 

include particular briefing on the 

following public interest issues: 

(1) Please identify and describe any 

planned but not yet completed projects 

involving the accused products, 

including the amount (wattage) of 

accused products needed to complete 

the project and the anticipated power 

generation associated with the project. 

(2) Please address the extent to which 

domestic industry products or other 

products are technically and practicably 

capable of replacing the accused 

products in the planned projects. Please 

address the extent to which replacing 

the accused products would result in 

project delays, additional costs, or 

reduced power generation. 

(3) To the extent that cancellation, 

delay, or reduced power generation of a 

project would result from a remedy in 

this investigation, how would that 

impact the overall supply of solar and 

other forms of clean energy in the 

United States? Please be as specific as 

possible. 

(4) What is Solaria’s and its 

manufacturing partners’ capacity to 

produce domestic industry products 

and do they currently have available 

capacity that could be used to increase 

production to replace the accused 

products? To the extent products other 

than domestic industry products are 

capable of replacing the accused 

products, please address the available 

capacity of any producers to supply 

those products. 

(5) What is the relevant market for 

purposes of considering the public 

interest in this investigation, for 

example, the market for shingled solar 

modules or the broader solar module 

market? What share of the market do the 

various market participants hold, 

including Canadian Solar and Solaria? 

What market share do domesticallyproduced solar modules have? 

(6) Please address whether an 

exception to any remedial orders for 

modules and/or parts for warranty, 

service, or repair obligations is 

necessary to address any identified 

public interest concerns. Please identify 

the scope of any such exception, if any, 

and any evidence relevant to this issue. 

Please also address whether Canadian 

Solar’s warranty, service, or repair 

obligations could be met with noninfringing alternatives. 

(7) Please address whether Canadian 

Solar’s U.S. inventories of accused 

products are commercially significant in 

an appropriate context. Are these 

inventories sufficient to supply the 

planned projects identified in response 

to Question 1? 

(8) To the extent tailoring is requested 

of any remedial orders to address one or 

more public interest concerns, is nonissuance of a cease and desist order (i.e., 

allowing Canadian Solar to continue to 

sell infringing U.S. inventories) 

sufficient to address those concerns? 

If the Commission orders some form 

of remedy, the U.S. Trade 

Representative, as delegated by the 

President, has 60 days to approve, 

disapprove, or take no action on the 

Commission’s determination. See 

Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 

2005. 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). 

During this period, the subject articles 

would be entitled to enter the United 

States under bond, in an amount 

determined by the Commission and 

prescribed by the Secretary of the 

Treasury. The Commission is therefore 

interested in receiving submissions 

concerning the amount of the bond that 

should be imposed if a remedy is 

ordered. 

Written Submissions: The parties, 

interested government agencies, and any 

other interested parties are invited to 

file written submissions on the issues of 

remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding. Such submissions should 

include views on the recommended 

determination by the ALJ on remedy 

and bonding. 

In its initial written submission, 

Solaria is requested to submit proposed 

remedial orders for the Commission’s 

consideration. Solaria is further 

requested to identify the dates the 

asserted patents expire, to provide the 

HTSUS subheadings under which the 

subject articles are imported, and to 

supply identification information for all 

known importers of the subject articles. 

Solaria is additionally requested to 

identify and explain, from the record, 

articles that are ‘‘components of’’ the 

subject articles, and thus covered by the 

proposed remedial orders, if imported 

separately from the subject articles. 

Initial written submissions, including 

proposed remedial orders, must be filed 

no later than close of business on 

February 18, 2022. Reply submissions 

must be filed no later than the close of 

business on March 4, 2022. No further 

submissions on any of these issues will 

be permitted unless otherwise ordered 

by the Commission. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above. The Commission’s paper 

filing requirements in 19 CFR 210.4(f) 

are currently waived. 85 FR 15798 (Mar. 

19, 2020). Submissions should refer to 

the investigation number (Inv. No. 337– 

TA–1223) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. (See 

Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ 

documents/handbook_on_filing_

procedures.pdf). Persons with questions 

regarding filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment by marking each document 

with a header indicating that the 

document contains confidential 

information. This marking will be 

deemed to satisfy the request procedure 

set forth in Rules 201.6(b) and 

210.5(e)(2) (19 CFR 201.6(b) & 

210.5(e)(2)). Documents for which 

confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document 

must also be filed simultaneously with 

any confidential filing. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
7870 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Notices 

1All contract personnel will sign appropriate 

nondisclosure agreements. 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel,1 solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All contract personnel will 

sign appropriate nondisclosure 

agreements. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection on EDIS. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on February 4, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 4, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02795 Filed 2–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1190–0001] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension 

Without Change, of a Previously 

Approved Collection; Procedures for 

the Administration of Section 5 of the 

Voting Rights Act of 1965 

AGENCY: Civil Rights Division, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Civil Rights Division, Voting 

Section will be submitting the following 

information collection request to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until April 

11, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Robert S. Berman, Deputy Chief, 

Department of Justice, Civil Rights 

Division, Voting Section, 950 

Pennsylvania Avenue, 7243 NWB, 

(phone: 202–514–8690). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Civil Rights Division, 

including whether the information 

will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Procedures for the Administration of 

Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 

1965. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

None (Civil Rights Division). 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: State, Local, or Tribal 

Government. Other: None. Abstract: 

Jurisdictions specially covered under 

the Voting Rights Act are required to 

comply with Sections 3 or 5 of the Act 

before they may implement any change 

in a standard, practice, or procedure 

affecting voting. One option for such 

compliance is to submit that change to 

Attorney General for review and 

establish that the proposed voting 

changes are not racially discriminatory. 

The procedures facilitate the provision 

of information that will enable the 

Attorney General to make the required 

determination. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 1 

respondent will complete each form 

within approximately 3.0 hours. 

6. An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The estimated public burden 

associated with this collection is 3.0 

total hours. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Melody Braswell, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405B, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: February 7, 2022. 

Melody Braswell, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02884 Filed 2–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB 1140–0074] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection of 

eComments Requested; Extension 

Without Change of a Currently 

Approved Collection; List of 

Responsible Persons 

AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives, Department of 

Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives 

(ATF), Department of Justice (DOJ), will 

submit the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection 

(IC) is also being published to obtain 

comments from the public and affected 

agencies. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until April 

11, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

regarding the estimated public burden 

or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions, or 

additional information, contact: Shawn 

Stevens, ATF National Services Center, 

Federal Explosives Licensing Center, by 

mail at 244 Needy Road, Martinsburg, 

WV 25405, email at Shawn.Stevens@

atf.gov, or telephone at 304–616–4400. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1