alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Did	you	know?

National	Guard	Bureau has	a	Task	Order	and	

Delivery	Order	Ombudsman

What	is	the	NGB	Ombudsman	Program?	

The	National	Guard Bureau	(NGB) created	the	

Task	Order	and	Delivery	Order	Ombudsman	

Program	to	ensure	there	is	an	impartial	resource	

to	review	a	contractor	complaint,	conflict	or	

dispute	under	multiple	award	task	order	

contracts	and	ensure	vendors receive	fair	

opportunity	to	compete.		The	Ombudsman	has	

the	authority	to	review	vendor	complaints	under	

$25M.

What	does	an	Ombudsman	do?	

The	Ombudsman’s	role	is	that	of	an	independent,	

neutral	mediator	between	industry	and	the	

government.	Under	multiple	award	contracts,	

the	Ombudsman	works	to	resolve	a	compliant	

that	cannot	be	resolved	at	the	Contracting	

Officer	level,	without	having	to	resort	to	formal	

protest	or	disputes	processes.	Since its	

inception,	the	program	has	had	great	success.	

The	Ombudsman	has	helped industry	and	NGB	

Procurement	Officials	resolve	issues	quickly	and	

improve	the	overall	acquisition	process.		Gaining	

trust	and	credibility	is	vital	to	the	success	of	our	

acquisition	program.		While	we	encourage	

vendors	to	seek	resolution	with	the	Contracting	

Officer	who	has	the	authority,	we	recognize	that	

sometimes	an	informal	independent/objective	

view	is	needed.

Who	is the	Ombudsman?	

The	Ombudsman	is	a	Senior	Civilian,	appointed	

by	the	Head	of	the	Contracting	Activity	that	has	a	

desire	to	work	with	the	parties	to	resolve	issues	

effectively	and	efficiently	without	resorting	to	

lengthy	and	formal	protests	or	dispute	

processes.

Where are	they located?

The	Ombudsman	is	located	attheNGB,	Directorate	

of	Acquisitions,	111	S.	George	Mason	Dr,	Arlington,	

VA	22204.	

Who	do	they work	for?

Although	the	Ombudsman	works for the Head of

the	Contracting	Activity,	they are independent	of

them	and	the	Contracting Officers. They have	a

collaborative	relationship	with	the parties and

assist	with the resolution	of	contractor	

complaints	informally.	

How can you contact the	Ombudsman?	

Phone:	703-601-7029

Email: ng.ncr.ngb-arng.mbx.ngb-task-orderombudsman@army.mil	

Related Information:	

Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 

5116.505(b)(8)

https://acquisition-staging.gsa.gov/afars/

part-5116-types-contracts#_Toc39052422

					NGB	Task	Order	Ombudsman	works	to:	

• Establish	open	lines	of	communication /	exchanges

between	NGB	and	 Industry

• Foster	informal	expeditious	and	effective

resolution	of	acquisition	issues

• Strengthen vendor	confidence	in	our

management	of	the	acquisition	process

• Ensure	regulatory	compliance	while

enhancing	transparency
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1088 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to implement certain recommendations 

regarding screening individuals who seek to enlist in the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2021 

Mr. AGUILAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to implement certain 

recommendations regarding screening individuals who 

seek to enlist in the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shielding our Military 

5 from Extremists Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1088 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN RECOMMENDA2 TIONS REGARDING SCREENING INDIVIDUALS 

3 WHO SEEK TO ENLIST IN THE ARMED 

4 FORCES. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement 

7 the seven recommendations of the Under Secretary of De8 fense for Personnel and Readiness on page 2 of the report 

9 titled ‘‘Screening Individuals Who Seek to Enlist in the 

10 Armed Forces’’, submitted to the Committees on Armed 

11 Services of the Senate and House of Representatives on 

12 October 14, 2020. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Melvin K. SPEAR, Appellant, v. Tari V. SPEAR, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4269

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

PEDRO ROMAN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1840

[ October 31, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Samantha Schosberg
Feuer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2011CF006736B

.
Pedro Roman, Bowling Green, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for post

convict ion relief without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court to obtain his records and trial transcripts. See Bush v. State , 947 So. 2d 685 , 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

D AMOORGIAN , C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.'s
33-16409, 33-38259 and 33-78614 of Shorewood Packaging Corporation each on Form
S-8 and to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-3671
of Shorewood Packaging Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated June 12,
1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shorewood Packaging
Corporation for the 52 weeks ended May 2, 1998.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York
July 27, 1998



                                 Page 45 of 45
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, February 9, 2022, 10-11 a.m.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held remotely.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Briefing Matter: Performance Requirements for Residential Gas Furnaces and Boilers.

                        All attendees and participants should pre-register online for the Commission meeting at:                         *https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/​register/​616536172932974863.*                         To pre-register online for the Meeting, please visit: and fill in the information. After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: February 2, 2022.

Alberta E. Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-02556 Filed 2-3-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1313 Prepped byLaTeiaShed



### Document

Number: 

# 86 ) ll-B-6 0 Docket Number: 

# A-88-0 2

Printed 6/12/20089:03:31A M

Sheet 86 of 99P. 2 

### T I -rV(* 0 

## A-88-0 2

Informatio n o n healt ho r ris k assessmen t wa s remove d fromth e docket . Thi s informatio n wa s compile d befor e th e Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendment s (1990 ) bu t wa s no t use d i n th e developmen t o f th e chromiu

mNESHAP ,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Fogelman Mortgage LP 1
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000800608
<NAME>              Fogelman Mortgage LP 1
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          420,884

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   25,701,746

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          285,565

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  26,408,195

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           336,485

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      26,071,710

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    26,408,195

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,682,766

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   525,757

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    1,157,009

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   16.93

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.27 

EXECUTIVE MEDICAL ALLOWANCE
PROGRAM
SUMMARY 


	Participants:	      	Corporate Officers and Division
      Presidents and other executives as may from time to time be approved for
      participation by the Compensation and Management Resources Committee of
      the Board of Directors of Foot Locker, Inc. (the “Compensation
      Committee”)
	 		
	Allowable
      Expenses:		
      Out-of-pocket medical expenses up to
      a set maximum annual dollar amount, as may be determined from time to time
      by the Compensation Committee.

	 		
	Section
      409A:		
      Except as permitted by Section 409A
      of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and regulations issued
      thereunder, the right to reimbursement (i) shall not be subject to
      liquidation or exchange for another benefit, (ii) the amount of expenses
      eligible for reimbursement during any taxable year shall not affect the
      expenses eligible for reimbursement in any other taxable year, provided
      that the foregoing clause (ii) shall not be violated with regard to
      expenses reimbursed under any arrangement covered by Section 105(b) of the
      Code solely because such expenses are subject to a limit related to the
      period the arrangement is in effect, and (iii) such reimbursements
      payments shall be made on or before the last day of the participant’s
      taxable year following the taxable year in which the expense was
      incurred.




120
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1199 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1199

To authorize the Secretary of State to waive certain requirements with 
  respect to eligibility for civil service positions relating to the 
     departmental formulation and direction of foreign affairs and 
            international relations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 22, 2021

 Ms. Houlahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of State to waive certain requirements with 
  respect to eligibility for civil service positions relating to the 
     departmental formulation and direction of foreign affairs and 
            international relations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Technical Experts in 
Managing Diplomacy Act'' or the ``STEM Diplomacy Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER AUTHORITY FOR OCCUPATIONAL REQUIREMENTS.

    The Secretary of State may waive any or all of the individual 
occupational requirements with respect to an employee or prospective 
employee of the Department of State for a civilian position categorized 
under the GS-0130 occupational series if the Secretary determines that 
the individual possesses significant scientific, technological, 
engineering, or mathematical expertise that is integral to performing 
the duties of the applicable position, based on demonstrated job 
performance and qualifying experience. With respect to each waiver 
granted under this section, the Secretary shall set forth in a written 
document that is transmitted to the Director of the Office of Personnel 
Management the rationale for the decision of the Secretary to waive 
such requirements.
                                 <all>
```
Brandon Jamal RYLES v. STATE

CR-14-0381

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter and nine months ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward C. Hall,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                   /S/ EDWARD C. HALL
                                   -------------------
                                   EDWARD C. HALL
                                   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   (PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER)

February 17, 2004
**Docket Number: FAA -**  **2015 -**  **2967**
Exhibit 21

Flanders Corporation and Subsidiaries

List of Subsidiaries

Listed below
are the subsidiaries of Flanders Corporation as of December 31, 2007. Names of certain inactive, liquidated, or
minor subsidiaries have been omitted.

|                                        |               
|--------------------------------------- | --------------
|Airpure
 Filter Sales and Service, Inc. | United
 States
|Air Seal
 Filter Housing, Inc.          | United
 States
|Flanders/CSC
 Corporation               | United
 States
|Flanders
 Filters, Inc.                 | United
 States
|Flanders
 International, PTE            | Singapore     
|Precisionaire,
 Inc.                    | United
 States
|Industrias
 Seco De Tijuana             | Mexico        

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATHAN AMBROSE VANLOAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

NATION OF ISLAM; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-55317 

D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00127-GW-MRW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Jonathan Ambrose VanLoan appeals pro se from the district court’s 

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a 

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 

(9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-55317 

The district court properly dismissed VanLoan’s action because VanLoan’s 

claims are too frivolous and unsubstantial to invoke subject matter jurisdiction. 

See Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 536 (1974) (“Over the years this Court has 

repeatedly held that the federal courts are without power to entertain claims 

otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are so attenuated and unsubstantial as to 

be absolutely devoid of merit . . . .”); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227 n.6 

(9th Cir. 1984), abrogated on other grounds by Nietzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 

(1989) (“A paid complaint that is ‘obviously frivolous’ does not confer federal 

subject matter jurisdiction[.]”).

AFFIRMED.
Ronald CLAMPITT and Gina Clampitt, Appellants, v. Marie WICK, as Assignee of Jerry Mastrangelo, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-819

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 16, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PREMARK
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS FILED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT
 ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                              <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                         147,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  497,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,600
<INVENTORY>                                    455,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,195,800
<PP&E>                                       1,174,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 611,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,095,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          589,100
<BONDS>                                        261,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     934,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,095,900
<SALES>                                      2,739,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,739,100
<CGS>                                        1,726,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,726,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,700 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                219,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    83,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            136,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   136,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.11
        
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 21.1

                  SHOREWOOD PACKAGING CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          Name                                                   State of Incorporation/Country
          ----                                                   ------------------------------
<S>                                                              <C>
Shorewood Packaging of California, Inc.                          California

Shorewood Packaging Company of Illinois, Inc.                    Illinois

SPC Company of Virginia, Inc.                                    Virginia

Shorewood Packaging Corporation of Alabama                       Alabama

Shorewood Packaging Corp. of Canada, Ltd.                        Ontario, Canada

Shorewood Transport, Inc.                                        New York

Shorewood Packaging of Delaware, Inc.                            Delaware

Shor-Wrap, Inc.                                                  Delaware

Shorewood Technologies, Inc.                                     Delaware

Shorewood Packaging Corporation of Georgia                       Georgia

Toronto Carton Corporation Limited                               Ontario, Canada

Shor-Wrap Packages of Canada, Ltd.                               Ontario, Canada

Shorewood Acquisition Corp. of Delaware                          Delaware

Shorewood Packaging Corporation of Virginia                      Delaware

SPC Company of New York, Inc.                                    New York

Shorewood Packaging Corporation of Connecticut                   Connecticut

Shorewood Corporation of Canada Limited                          Ontario, Canada

SPC Corporation Limited                                          Ontario, Canada

Shorewood Packaging Corporation of Oregon                        Oregon

Shorewood Packaging of North Carolina, Inc.                      Delaware

Shorewood Packaging Corporation of New York                      New York

Shorewood Packaging Company (Guangzhou) Ltd.                     China

Shorewood Holographic Patterns, Inc.                             Delaware
</TABLE>




                                 Page 55 of 56
2 Attachments 

Raj, Lisa, Anna,

  

Greetings.  Attached please find proposed edits to EPA’s suggested biogenic GHG language.  Let’s chat sometime today about these if possible.

  

Thanks,

Christine

202.395.4638

Interagency revisions to EPA proposed Biogenic emissions language

Kymn, Christine J. 

to: 

Raj Rao, Lisa Sutton, Anna Wood 

08/03/2010 12:03 PM 

Show Details 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Interagency edits1_Proposed language, biogenic GHG sources, EPA NPRMs, Actions to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the PSD Program to Sources of GHG Emissions.docx

Interagency edits2_Proposed language, biogenic GHG sources, EPA NPRMs, Actions to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the PSD Program to Sources of GHG Emissions.docx

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\lsutto01\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web1625.... 8/26/2010