alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Christopher JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1043

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Larhonda FELDER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Clinton G. TURNER, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0991

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Amendment for Docket# FAA-2015-1226

Advanced Aviation Solutions (ADAVSO) requests an amendment to our Section 333 Exemption 

FAA-2015-1226. In order to maintain the highest level of operational safety we would like to 

add the following models to our exemption: DJI Phantom 3, Matrice, 3DR Solo, and the 

SteadiDrone Flare and Mavrik. These all incorporate state of the art flight directors; Pixhawk, 

Naza-M, and 3DR, greatly improving safety and ensuring effective operations. The rapidly 

changing capabilities of the UAS increases the importance of updating systems and use the most 

capable and increasingly more efficient and safest models available. The additions of these 

models to the existing exemption will increase the overall safety and efficiency of all of our 

operations. All of these models run similar flight controls and have very similar safety features 

to include return to home point. It is in the public’s best interest to allow us to utilize these

cutting edge UAS. These new UAS will increase overall operational capabilities and decrease 

any chance for a maintenance related safety issue. 

UAS operations in aerial surveying, aerial photography, agriculture operations, wildlife and 

forestry management, wild land firefighting support, aerial inspection and mapping operations 

with little to no negative impact on our fragile environment. UAS’s will reduce noise, fuel 

vapor, fuel burn, fuel spills and many of the other dangerous side effects of the larger manned 

aircraft. 

Please take the time to review our request and approve this amendment.
----

|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/    Sylvan Odobulu |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Sylvan Odobulu                  |
| Principal Accounting Officer    |
| December 22, 2015               |

----
#### Quentin J. HOLT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bryan STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections; Leroy Cartledge, McCormick Correctional Institution, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 17-6427

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

Elizabeth Anne Franklin-Best, BLUME, NORRIS & FRANKLIN-BEST, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quentin J. Holt seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(e)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Holt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, *146we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
- Contingency Plan Guidance Attachment-1
- Contingency Plan Guidance Attachment-2
- Contingency Plan Guidance Attachment-3
- Contingency Plan Guidance Attachment-4
- Contingency Plan Guidance Attachment-5
- Contingency Plan Guidance Attachment-6
- Contingency Plan Guidance Attachment-7
- Contingency Plan Guidance Attachment-8
- Contingency Plan Guidance Attachment-9
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Umbrella Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G.
Yedinak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John G. Yedinak

John G. Yedinak
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003





<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Umbrella Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Colleen A.
Kitch, Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Colleen A. Kitch

Colleen A. Kitch
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
August 14, 2003
Douglas H. KEEVIS, a/k/a Douglas Henry Keevis, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3824

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Milton Lee HARRIS and Lisa Harris v. Stephen M. BREAUD, M.D.

NO. 2017 CA 0422

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Judgment Rendered: FEBRUARY 27, 2018

Alan K. Breaud, Timothy W. Basden, Lafayette, LA, Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee, Stephen M. Breaud, M.D.

Steve Adams, Baton Rouge, LA, Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellants, Milton Lee Harris and Lisa Harris

BEFORE: HIGGINBOTHAM, HOLDRIDGE, AND PENZATO, JJ.

HIGGINBOTHAM, J.

In this medical malpractice case, plaintiffs, Mr. Milton Lee Harris and his wife, Mrs. Lisa Harris, contend that the trial court erred in holding that all of their claims against defendant, Dr. Stephen M. Breaud, other than the claims related to the medical procedure performed on December 29, 2009, were prescribed.

Because the issues in this appeal and the related appeal, **Harris v. Breaud** 2017-0421 (La. App. 1st Cir. 22/27/8), 243 So.3d 572, 2018 WL 1059604 ( **Harris** , 0421 ), decided this same date were included in a single judgment pursuant to a rule to show cause issued by this court, we addressed the assignment of error laid out in this appeal by the Harrises in **Harris** , 0421. In **Harris** , 0421, we concluded that the trial court properly granted Dr. Breaud's peremptory exception raising the objection of prescription. Consequently, for the same reasons expressed in our opinion in the related **Harris** , 0421 appeal, we hereby affirm via summary opinion in accordance with Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-16.2, the granting by the trial court of Dr. Breaud's peremptory exception raising the objection of prescription. All costs of this appeal are assessed against plaintiffs, *623Mr. Milton Lee Harris and Mrs. Lisa Harris.

**AFFIRMED.**
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 26, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. Brown

Jack H. BrownChairman, President, andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)May 10, 2006/s/ Phillip J. Smith

Phillip J. SmithExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 10, 2006
Karl A. KUMMER, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY as Trustee FOR HARBOR-VIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-8; Janice Kummer; RJM Contractors, Inc.; Las Palmas of Sarasota Condominium Association, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-183

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.37


October 12, 2018


Charles Meyers
Equinix, Inc,  
One Lagoon Drive
Redwood City, CA 94065


Dear Charles:


On behalf of Equinix, I would like to congratulate you on your appointment as Equinix’s Chief Executive Officer and President.


As this position will be based at Equinix’s corporate headquarters in Redwood City, California, Equinix would like to assist you and your family with your relocation. To help cover the costs of your relocation, you will be awarded a one-time cash payment of $300,000, subject to Federal, State and Medicare withholding taxes, which will be paid through Equinix payroll. 


This payment is intended to assist you with covering typical relocation transfer costs including, but not limited to, transportation of household goods, temporary accommodations, car rentals and costs associated with the purchase of a new home. No receipts are required, and no further expense claims may be applied for relating to your relocation. Your relocation should be completed no later than May 31, 2019.


In addition, Equinix agrees to complete a BVO sale of your residence, with completion expected within an 18-month period.


Should your employment with Equinix terminate voluntarily or for Cause, within a period of one year from the date hereof, the payment of $300,000 and any expenses incurred by Equinix in connection with the BVO sale of your home must be repaid in full to Equinix. You will repay Equinix the amounts owing within 30 days after your last date of employment.


For purposes of this Agreement, Cause shall mean your unauthorized use or disclosure of trade secrets which causes material harm to Equinix, your conviction of, or a plea of “guilty” or “no contest” to, a felony, or your gross misconduct.


Sincerely,


/s/ Peter Van Camp                10/12/18


Peter Van Camp                    Date            
Executive Chairman




Agreed to and Acknowledged:


/s/ Charles Meyers                10/12/18


Charles Meyers                     Date            
CEO & President, Equinix
The Blended Retirement
System Opt-In Decision The National Guard
Traditional Guardsmen

Non-Regular Retirement

ve

TSP Comparison

Service Member TSP contributions count towards the annual intemal revenue
code limit per person ($18,000 for 2017) of the income you may elect to defer
under all employer-sponsored retirement plans during a tax year.

Current TSP
No government matching

Blended TSP

Government matching and automatic contribution of 1%
100% vested with 2 years of service
Over 26 years of service not eligible for match

You Contribute Lowel DoD Matches Teta!
© New accessions after January 1“, 2018 will be automatically enrolled in = = = =
the Blended Retirement System 1% 1% 1% 3%
© if you have 4320 points or higher, you are NOT eligible for the = = — a
Blended Retirement System bled bed 3% Med
“Estimate based on £7 retiree with 20 “qualifying years” and 2,600 — — — —
(or earl paket pte Leelee pelea Es} =. c) Ls]

Blended Retirement ONLY

Continuation Pay (service Determined)

The Lump Sum is a cash advance against your retired pay. Members of the Uniformed Services are eligible to receive a one-time, mid-career
Decision made at retirement. bonus payment in exchange for an agreement to perform additional obligated
service. This one-time bonus payment is in addition to any other career
Optional advance of 25% or 50% of retirement pay feld-specific incentives or retention bonuses.
with reduced pension through age 67
Option available at age 60 or reduced age at retirement Window of eligibility 8-12 years of service
Discounted present value, not full value. Minimum 3 years of service commitment
Initial discount rate 6.99% for 2018 retirees Member may receive:
VA disability compensation could be offset Drill status: .5 to 6 months of equivalent active duty base pay

AGR/ Career status: 2.5 to 13 months base pay
Resources

Find your nearest Personal Financial Counselor: www.militaryinstallations.dod.mil
Financial counseling by phone, chat, and in-person: www.militaryonesource.mil

Take the mandatory “Opt In" course on JKO or through Military One Source
=> http jko,jten.mil/courses/brs/opt-in/launch.html

Visit www.dfas.mil for military pay charts and military TSP contributions

When - comes to your

. To lear more about the Thrift Savings Program, eligibility and contributions,
Professional Advice eee

For more information on your benefits visit https://myarmybenefits.us.army.mil

jov/BlendedRetirement

Create: 3/2017
PR: NGBII
Marlon GRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-0113

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
MEMORANDUM 

January 25, 2010 

To: I. Salinas 

Via: K. Kunaniec 

From: T. Underwood 

Re: Outside Test NTV-742; September 20, 2009 source test 

Site No: A4538 

Plant No: 4538; Western Roto Engravers 

Source No: S-1; Plating tank 

Abated by: A-2, A-3; Demister, HEPA 

A/C No: 19197, 3130, 9719 

Cond. No. 16358; Cr+6 0.0015 mg/A-hr 

By: Shaw Environmental 

I have reviewed the source test report cited above and note the following: 

1) Source test was properly notified (NST-1806). 

2) I did not witness the test. 

3) The testing appears to have been conducted by personnel who are familiar with 

proper source testing techniques. 

4) Quality assurance procedures were adequate to assure data integrity. 

5) Testing determined total chrome. Emission limits are for Cr6. Cr6 is a subset of 

total chrome. 

6) Results of that testing are that quantified emissions were in compliance with the 

emission limits cited above. 

This source was in compliance with District Regulations.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Valassis Communications, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge and belief that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2008 |  |                        
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Alan F. Schultz    
|                   |  | Alan F. Schultz        
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Jamie  B.  Coulter,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of Lone  Star
Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 22, 2005 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ Jamie B. Coulter
                                                ---------------------
                                                Jamie B. Coulter
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                May 2, 2005
```
20-F















Exhibit 10.1  







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the  incorporation by
reference in the Registration  Statement (Forms S-8 No.  333-54356,  333-117849 and
 333-136633)  pertaining  to the 2003 Share Option Plan of Ceragon  Networks Ltd. of our
reports dated April 1, 2009, with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements of
Ceragon  Networks Ltd. and the  effectiveness  of internal control over financial
 reporting of Ceragon Networks Ltd.  included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the
year ended December 31, 2008. 








		
		
		
		
		
	 	 /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERER 
	Tel-Aviv, Israel	KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERER
	April 1, 2009	A Member of Ernst & Young Global
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Richard A. Ross, as Chief Financial Officer of The FINOVA Group Inc. (the
Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 9, 2005

| |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                              
| |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------------
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard A. Ross
| |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Richard A. Ross              
| |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Chief Financial Officer      
| |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | (principal financial officer)
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 9:19 AM

To: 'Todd@upaerialmedia.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Peition for Exemption: Up Aerial, LLC (FAA-2015-0330)



### May 28, 2015

Dear Mr. Chikasawa:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0300). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by June 11, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov