7068 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

Sidney, British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; 

phone: (North America) (800) 663–8444; fax: 

(250) 656–0673; email: technical.support@

vikingair.com; website: https://

www.vikingair.com/support/service-bulletins. 

You may review this referenced service 

information at the FAA, Airworthiness 

Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 

901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110. 

Issued on February 2, 2022. 

Gaetano A. Sciortino, 

Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, 

Compliance & Airworthiness Division, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02548 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 183 

National Policy Regarding 

Organization Designation 

Authorization (ODA) Holder 

Interference With Unit Members (UMs) 

and Communication Between UMs and 

the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notification of availability; 

request for comments. 

SUMMARY: This document would 

supplement FAA Order 8100.15B, 

Organization Designation Authorization 

(ODA) Procedures, for FAA personnel 

and those seeking or wishing to 

maintain ODA holder privileges. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 10, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments with the 

subject line, ‘‘National Policy Regarding 

Organization Designation Authorization 

(ODA) Holder Interference with ODA 

Unit Members (UMs) and 

Communication between UMs and the 

Federal Aviation Administration’’ on all 

submitted correspondence using the 

following method: Email comments to: 

Emily.CTR.Rogers@faa.gov. 

Privacy: In addition to the final 

Notice, the FAA will post all comments 

it receives, without change, to http://

drs.faa.gov, including any personal 

information the commenter provides. 

DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement 

can be found in the Federal Register 

published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 

19477–19478), as well as at http://

DocketsInfo.dot.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Trey McClure, Flight Standards Service, 

AFS–600, by email at Trey.McClure@

faa.gov, or Mr. Scott Geddie, Aircraft 

Certification Service, AIR–600, by email 

at Scott.Geddie@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

Section 107 of the Aircraft 

Certification, Safety, and Accountability 

Act of 2020 (the Act) addresses, in part, 

preventing interference with Unit 

Members (UMs) of companies that hold 

Organization Designation Authorization 

(ODA), and allowing communication 

between ODA UMs and the FAA. The 

FAA seeks comments on a draft 

statement that responds to Section 107 

requirements by providing procedures 

for ODA holder investigation and 

prevention of interference, for FAA 

oversight of ODAs, and for 

communication between ODA UMs and 

the FAA. The Notice supplements FAA 

Order 8100.15B, Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) 

Procedures (available at http:// 

drs.faa.gov) and may be examined at 

https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/draft_ 

docs/. 

Comments Invited 

The FAA invites interested 

stakeholders to submit comments on the 

proposed statement, as specified in the 

ADDRESSES section of this Notice. 

Commenters should include the subject 

line, ‘‘Organization Designation 

Authorization (ODA) Holder 

Interference with ODA Unit Members 

(UMs) and Communication between 

UMs and the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA)’’ on all comments 

submitted to the FAA. The most helpful 

comments reference a specific 

recommendation, explain the reason for 

any recommended change, and include 

supporting information. The FAA will 

consider all comments received on or 

before the closing date before issuing 

the final Notice. The FAA will also 

consider late filed comments if it is 

possible to do so without incurring 

expense or delay. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 4, 

2022. 

Brandon Roberts, 

Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02744 Filed 2–7–22; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network 

31 CFR Chapter X 

RIN 1506–AB54 

Anti-Money Laundering Regulations 

for Real Estate Transactions 

AGENCY: Financial Crimes Enforcement 

Network (‘‘FinCEN’’), Treasury. 

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed 

rulemaking, extension of comment 

period. 

SUMMARY: On December 8, 2021, 

FinCEN issued an Advance Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) to 

solicit public comment on potential 

requirements under the Bank Secrecy 

Act (BSA) for certain persons involved 

in real estate transactions to collect, 

report, and retain information. FinCEN 

is extending the comment period of the 

ANPRM until February 21, 2022. 

DATES: The comment period for the 

ANPRM published on December 8, 

2021, at 86 FR 69589, is extended. 

Written comments are now due on or 

before February 21, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted, identified by Regulatory 

Identification Number (RIN) 1506– 

AB54, by any of the following methods: 

Federal E-rulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Include 1506–AB54 in the submission. 

Refer to Docket Number FINCEN–2021– 

0007. 

Mail: Financial Crimes Enforcement 

Network, Global Investigations Division, 

P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183. Include 

1506–AB54 in the body of the text. Refer 

to Docket Number FINCEN–2021–0007. 

Please submit comments by one 

method only. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

FinCEN: The FinCEN Regulatory 

Support Section at 1–800–767–2825 or 

electronically at frc@fincen.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

December 8, 2021, FinCEN published an 

ANPRM to assist in the consideration 

and preparation of a proposed rule to 

address money laundering 

vulnerabilities in the real estate sector. 

The ANPRM provided that comments 

on the ANPRM must be submitted by 

February 7, 2022. FinCEN appreciates 

and values the comments received so 

far. To allow for additional time to 

comment on the issues and questions 

raised in the ANPRM, FinCEN is 

extending the comment period for 14 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Proposed Rules 7069 

days. Thus, written comments are now 

due on or before February 21, 2022. 

Himamauli Das, 

Acting Director, Financial Crimes 

Enforcement Network. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02593 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–02–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0107; FRL–9426–01– 

R9] 

Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa 

County; Power Plants 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

revision to the Maricopa County Air 

Quality Department’s (MCAQD or 

County) portion of the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). This 

revision concerns emissions of oxides of 

nitrogen (NOX) and particulate matter 

(PM) from power plants. We are 

proposing to approve a local rule to 

regulate these emission sources under 

the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We 

are taking comments on this proposal 

and plan to follow with a final action. 

Elsewhere in this Federal Register, we 

are making an interim final 

determination to defer CAA sanctions 

associated with our previous 

disapproval action concerning the 

County’s revision of this local rule. 

DATES: must be received on or before 

March 10, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– 

OAR–2022–0107 at https://

www.regulations.gov. For comments 

submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish 

any comment received to its public 

docket. Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

For the full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. If you need 

assistance in a language other than 

English or if you are a person with 

disabilities who needs a reasonable 

accommodation at no cost to you, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 

94105. By phone: (415) 972–3073 or by 

email at gong.kevin@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rule did the State submit? 

B. Are there other versions of this rule? 

C. What is the purpose of Rule 322? 

II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? 

B. Does Rule 322 meet the evaluation 

criteria? 

C. Public Comment and Proposed Action 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rule did the State submit? 

The Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality (ADEQ) 

submitted MCAQD Rule 322 ‘‘Power 

Plant Operations’’ as amended on June 

23, 2021, and submitted to the EPA on 

June 24, 2021. On September 25, 2021, 

the EPA determined that the submittal 

for MCAQD Rule 322 met the 

completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 

appendix V, which must be met before 

formal EPA review. 

B. Are there other versions of this rule? 

We approved a previous version of 

Rule 322 (locally revised on October 17, 

2007) into the Arizona SIP on October 

14, 2009 (74 FR 52693). The County 

adopted revisions to the SIP-approved 

version on November 2, 2016, and 

ADEQ submitted them to us on June 22, 

2017. The EPA disapproved that 

revision in a final rule published on July 

20, 2020 (85 FR 43692). If we take final 

action to approve the June 23, 2021 

version of Rule 322, this version will 

replace the previously approved version 

of this rule in the SIP. 

C. What is the purpose of Rule 322? 

Emissions of NOX contribute to the 

production of ground-level ozone, smog 

and PM, which harm human health and 

the environment. Emissions of PM, 

including PM equal to or less than 2.5 

microns in diameter (PM2.5) and PM 

equal to or less than 10 microns in 

diameter (PM10), contribute to effects 

that are harmful to human health and 

the environment, including premature 

mortality, aggravation of respiratory and 

cardiovascular disease, decreased lung 

function, visibility impairment, and 

damage to vegetation and ecosystems. 

Section 110(a) of the CAA requires 

states to submit regulations that control 

NOX and PM emissions. Rule 322 

regulates equipment at power plants 

that emit these and other pollutants. 

The EPA’s technical support document 

(TSD) has more information about this 

rule. 

II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? 

Rules in the SIP must be enforceable 

(see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not 

interfere with applicable requirements 

concerning attainment and reasonable 

further progress or other CAA 

requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), 

and must not modify certain SIP control 

requirements in nonattainment areas 

without ensuring equivalent or greater 

emissions reductions (see CAA section 

193). 

Generally, SIP rules must require 

reasonably available control technology 

(RACT) for each major source of NOX in 

ozone nonattainment areas classified as 

Moderate or above (see CAA sections 

182(b)(2) and 182(f)). The MCAQD 

regulates a portion of the Phoenix-Mesa 

ozone nonattainment area which is 

classified as Moderate for the 2008 8- 

hour ozone national ambient air quality 

standard (40 CFR 81.303). Maricopa 

County’s ‘‘Analysis of Reasonably 

Available Control Technology For The 

2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient 

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) State 

Implementation Plan (RACT SIP),’’ 

adopted December 5, 2016, submitted 

June 22, 2017 (the ‘‘2016 RACT SIP’’), 

found that there were major sources of 

NOX within the Maricopa County 

portion of the Phoenix-Mesa ozone 

nonattainment area subject to Rule 322. 

Accordingly, this rule must establish 

RACT levels of control for applicable 

major sources of NOX. 

The EPA’s previous rulemaking on 

the 2017 version of Rule 322 found 

several deficiencies that did not allow 

for approval of that revision into the 

Arizona SIP. These deficiencies 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS