alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NAIMA 


NORTH AMERICAN INSULATION 


MANUPACTURERSASSOCIATION 


VIA E-MAIL AND OVERNIGHT MAIL 

September 19,2013 

Ms. Susan Fairchild 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02) 

Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

4930 Old Page Road 

Durham, NC 27703 

RE: 	 EPA's Draft Work Practice Standards For HF and HCI Emissions From Wool 

Fiberglass Melting Furnaces 

Dear Ms. Fairchild: 

NAIMA greatly appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the attached "Draft Work 

Practice Standards for HF and HCI Emissions from Wool Fiberglass Melting Furnaces." The 

attached document and accompanying redlined document convey NAIMA's comments. 

Throughout the document, NAIMA has eliminated the use ofthe word "e-glass," which in EPA's 

draft seems to have referenced glass from electronics. "E-glass" is an industry term of art used 

to describe a specific glass type in the continuous filament fiber glass industry which was 

originally developed for military uses, but e-glass is not the type of glass used at facilities subject 

to NNN in the production ofwool fiber glass. 

Please note that there are some instances where a small amount of fluoride is included in the 

glass formulation used to produce wool fiber glass. Test results on melters using fluoride in the 

glass chemistry at locations subject to NNN were similar for HF to results for other HF tests in 

the ICR process, and in no event exceeded a 0.25 ton per year emission rate. 

In addition, the rolling average referenced in the revised work practice needs to be a flexible 

average simply because the companies do not test monthly. The average referenced in the work 

practice will likely be based in mUltiple tests, but not monthly tests. 

Please contact me if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

-Awo&.~ 

Angus E. Crane 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel 

Attachments 

44 Canal Center Plaza 0 Suite 310 0 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 0 Tel: (703) 684-0084 0 Fax: (703) 684-0427 
Ms. Susan Fairchild 

September 19,2013 

Page 2 

cc: 	 Mr. Keith W. Barnett 

Group Leader, Office ofAir Quality and Planning Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division, Mineral and Manufacturing Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 


4930 Old Page Road 


Durham, NC 27703
Quobadis PORTILLO and Lidia Lopez, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1564

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Kevin A. KYLE, Trustee; Damascus Trading Company, LLC; Kimberly Regenesis, LLC; and Mouracade Regenerative Medicine, LLC, Petitioners, v. LEE COUNTY, a Florida political subdivision, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-3620

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,159
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,214
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   596
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,349
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,349
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,349
<LOANS>                                        238,120
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,788
<DEPOSITS>                                     239,752
<SHORT-TERM>                                    20,775
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,516
<LONG-TERM>                                     17,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                         8,849
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 313,788
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,790
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   30
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   207
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,027
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,622
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 772
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,633
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      185
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 151
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (121)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           5
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,336
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,341
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.98
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,982
<LOANS-PAST>                                     7,982
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   940
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       77
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,048
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               923
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            923
        

</TABLE>
Robert GIELCHINSKY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. VIBO CORPORATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1901

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 06, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1281 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1281

 To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 
   clinic in Gaylord, Michigan, as the ``Navy Corpsman Steve Andrews 
          Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2021

 Mr. Bergman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 
   clinic in Gaylord, Michigan, as the ``Navy Corpsman Steve Andrews 
          Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMUNITY-BASED 
              OUTPATIENT CLINIC, GAYLORD, MICHIGAN.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 
clinic located at 2782 S. Otsego Avenue, Gaylord, Michigan, shall after 
the date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 
``Navy Corpsman Steve Andrews Department of Veterans Affairs Health 
Care Clinic''. Any reference to such clinic in any law, regulation, 
map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the Navy Corpsman Steve Andrews 
Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TAPISTRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                               685
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        207
<ALLOWANCES>                                         25
<INVENTORY>                                          2,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,282
<PP&E>                                               1,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       6,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,889
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             14
<OTHER-SE>                                           3,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         6,190
<SALES>                                              4,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4,726
<CGS>                                                2,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (100)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (745)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (745)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.02)


</TABLE>
Exhibit






                                                                                                                                              Exhibit 10.29.14


AMENDMENT NUMBER THIRTEEN TO THE 
METLIFE LEADERSHIP DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(As amended and restated effective with respect to salary and Cash Incentive Compensation January 1, 2005 and with respect to Stock Compensation, April 15, 2005)


The MetLife Leadership Deferred Compensation Plan (“the Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of the dates set forth below, as follows:


		
	I.
	Section 7.2 shall be replaced with the following, effective January 1, 2019:




		
	7.2
	Unless otherwise determined by the Plan Administrator, a Reallocation Election shall be effective on the date it is received by the Plan Administrator, or on the following day if it is received by the Plan Administrator at a time when the Plan Administrator determines that it is not practical or convenient to the operation of the Plan to apply such Reallocation Election on the date that is received.




		
	II.
	Section 22.33 shall be replaced with the following, effective March 15, 2018:




		
	22.33  
	“SIP” shall mean each and all of the MetLife 401(k) Plan, the MetLife Auxiliary Match Plan (and/or any successor plan(s)).   




		
	III.
	Section 4.7 shall be replaced with the following, effective January 1, 2019:




		
	4.7
	Effective prior to January 1, 2019, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Plan to the contrary, no Compensation payable to a Participant less than one hundred eighty (180) days after the first day of the second calendar month following a hardship payment to the Participant under SIP or other nonqualified deferred compensation plan in which the individual participates by virtue of employment with any Affiliate shall be deferred under this Plan.  Effective as of January 1, 2019, Participants who have received a hardship distribution under SIP or any other deferred compensation arrangement sponsored by an Affiliate shall be eligible to continue deferring Compensation under this Plan without interruption.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment Number Thirteen to the MetLife Leadership Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby adopted and approved.




By: /s/Andrew J. Bernstein        
PLAN ADMINISTRATOR


Date:  12/4/2018            











Witness /s/Kathleen Kamocsai    






Explanation of Amendment Thirteen to
MetLife Leadership Deferred Compensation Plan


Item I – Section 7.2 is amended to eliminate the six-per-year limit on Reallocation Elections that existed prior to January 1, 2019.


Item II – Changes the definition of “SIP” to reflect the name change of SIP and Auxiliary SIP to the MetLife 401(k) Plan and the MetLife Auxiliary Match Plan, respectively.


Item III – eliminates the six-month suspension of contributions to the Leadership Plan for participants who receive a hardship distribution from SIP.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew William MCLEAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-11270 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(October 25, 2016)

Michelle Thresher Taylor, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Stacie B. Harris, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL.

Rosemary Cakmis, Craig L. Crawford, Tracy N. DaCruz, Donna Lee Elm, Robert Godfrey, Orlando, FL, Yvette Clair Gray, Tampa, FL, Matthew William McLean, Tucson, AZ.

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew McLean appeals his sentence to a term of supervised release for life for committing a felony sex offense while required to register as a sex offender. 18 U.S.C. § 2260A. The district court ordered that McLean’s term of supervised release run concurrently with a sentence to supervised release for life for attempting to transport a minor with the intent to engage in a sexual activity, *id.*§ 2423(e). McLean argues, for the first time, that his registration offense was a Class C felony, *see id.*§§ 2260A, 3559(a), for which he faced a maximum statutory penalty of three years of supervised release, *see id.*§ 3583(b)(2). We affirm.

Even if the district court erred by imposing a term of supervised release for life for McLean’s registration offense, that error did not warrant relief under the plain error rule. The error did not affect McLean’s substantial rights because his term of supervised release remained the same regardless of the error. *See United States v. Cartwright,*413 F.3d 1295, 1300-01 (11th Cir. 2005) (“[P]lain error affects ... substantial rights ... [only if] the error actually did make a difference.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). McLean concedes that the district court committed no error in sentencing him to a term of supervised release for life for his offense under section 2423(e). McLean argues that he could face “up to two years [of imprisonment] ... [s]hould” the district court revoke his supervised release, but “where the effect of an error on the result in the district court is uncertain or indeterminate—where we would have to speculate—the appellant has not met his burden of showing ... that his substantial rights have been affected,” *United States v. Rodriguez,*398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir. 2005).

We AFFIRM McLean’s sentence.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Operations 
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        485,825
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 150,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                   48,828
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              631,242 
<PP&E>                                        980,889
<DEPRECIATION>                                212,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             25,987,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         747,853
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        40
<COMMON>                                      201,812
<OTHER-SE>                                 25,038,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               25,987,993
<SALES>                                        54,100 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               61,977
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            3,442,223
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            153,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (3,380,246)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (3,380,246)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                              (3,380,246)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.17)
<FN>

Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line item on the Balance 
Sheet or Statement of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1444 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1444

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 132 North Loudoun Street, Suite 1 in Winchester, Virginia, as the 
                      ``Patsy Cline Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2021

    Ms. Wexton (for herself, Mr. Wittman, Mrs. Luria, Mr. Scott of 
     Virginia, Mr. McEachin, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Cline, Ms. 
 Spanberger, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Griffith, and Mr. Connolly) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 132 North Loudoun Street, Suite 1 in Winchester, Virginia, as the 
                      ``Patsy Cline Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PATSY CLINE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 132 North Loudoun Street, Suite 1 in Winchester, Virginia, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Patsy Cline Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Patsy 
Cline Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1427 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1427

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain bona 
     fide residents of the Virgin Islands who are shareholders of 
  corporations organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands are not 
 treated as United States persons for purposes of determining certain 
     inclusions in gross income with respect to such corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2021

 Ms. Plaskett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain bona 
     fide residents of the Virgin Islands who are shareholders of 
  corporations organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands are not 
 treated as United States persons for purposes of determining certain 
     inclusions in gross income with respect to such corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN BONA FIDE RESIDENTS OF VIRGIN ISLANDS NOT TREATED AS 
              UNITED STATES SHAREHOLDERS OF CORPORATIONS ORGANIZED IN 
              THE VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 957(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1), by 
redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3), and by inserting after 
paragraph (1) the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) with respect to a corporation organized under the 
        laws of the Virgin Islands, such term does not include an 
        individual who is a bona fide resident of the Virgin Islands, 
        if a dividend received by such individual during the taxable 
        year from such corporation would, for purposes of section 
        934(b)(1), be treated as income derived from sources within the 
        Virgin Islands, and''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 957(c) of such Code is amended 
by striking ``paragraph (2)'' in the last sentence and inserting 
``paragraph (3)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 
31, 2020, and taxable years of individuals within which or with which 
such taxable years of foreign corporations end.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of New World Brands, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(i) The Annual Reporton Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: April 15, 2009 | By:                     | /s/ Shehryar Wahid |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------|
|                      | Shehryar Wahid          |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----