Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices 6497 

1See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2020, 86 FR 

41956 (August 4, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review: Large Diameter 

Welded Pipe from Canada; 2018–2020,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

3See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: 

Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 

2019) (Order). 

4 In the Initiation Notice, this company was listed 

as Canam (St Gedeon). However, in its certification 

of no shipments, it noted that Canam (St Gedeon) 

is a plant location and not its legal name. It also 

noted that it had recently undergone a corporate 

restructuring and is now named Canam Group Inc., 

which is the successor entity to Canam Group Inc. 

f/k/a Canam Buildings and Structures Inc. See 

Canam’s Letter, ‘‘No Shipments Letter for Canam 

Group Inc. f/k/a Canam Buildings and Structures 

Inc.,’’ dated August 7, 2020; see also Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 41540 (July 10, 

2020). 

5See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 41956–57. 

6See Appendix I. 

7See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comments 2, 3, 5 and 6. 

8See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 41957; see also 

PDM at 4. 

9 Id. 

10See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 41957; see also 

Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from 

Taiwan; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 60627, 

60627 (October 7, 2015), unchanged in Narrow 

Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan; 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014, 81 FR 22578 (April 18, 2016); 

and Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for 

Sale from the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 

FR 51779, 51780 (August 26, 2015). 

circumstances under which Commerce 

will grant untimely-filed requests for the 

extension of time limits. Please review 

the Final Rule, available at https://

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ 

html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 

submitting factual information in these 

segments. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: January 31, 2022. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02352 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–863] 

Large Diameter Welded Pipe From 

Canada: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that the 

producers or exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

large diameter welded pipe from the 

Canada in the United States at prices 

below normal value (NV) during the 

period of review (POR), August 27, 

2018, through April 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 4, 2021, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of this 

administrative review.1 The review 

covers 40 producers or exporters of 

subject merchandise. We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. A summary of the 

events that occurred since Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results, as 

well as a full discussion of the issues 

raised by parties for these final results, 

are discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 3

The product covered by this Order is 

large diameter welded pipe from 

Canada. For a complete description of 

the scope of the Order, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that Canam (St Gedeon) 

(Canam),4 had no shipments during the 

POR.5 As we have received no 

information to contradict this 

determination, consistent with our 

practice, we will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate 

any existing entries of subject 

merchandise produced by this 

company, but exported by other parties, 

at the rate for the intermediate reseller, 

if available, or at the all-others rate. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the parties’ case 

and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum and 

are listed in Appendix I to this notice.6

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on comments received from 

interested parties regarding our 

Preliminary Results and our review of 

the record to address those comments, 

we made changes to the Preliminary 

Results, as detailed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.7

Rate for Non-Examined Respondents 

As we stated in the Preliminary 

Results, the statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act.8 For the weighted-average dumping 

margin for non-examined respondents 

in an administrative review, generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation.9 Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available. For these 

final results, we calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin for Evraz Inc. 

NA (Evraz), the sole mandatory 

respondent, that was not zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available. Accordingly, consistent with 

our practice, we applied the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for 

Evraz as the weighted-average dumping 

margin for the non-examined 

companies.10

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

POR: 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
6498 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices 

11 In the underlying less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, Commerce determined that Evraz Inc. 

NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and the Canadian 

National Steel Corporation (or Corp.) (collectively, 

Evraz) comprise a single entity. See Order. There is 

no information on the record of this review that 

warrants reconsideration of this single entity 

determination. In the Preliminary Results, 

Commerce inadvertently listed the abbreviated 

name form ‘‘Canadian National Steel Corp’’ in 

Appendix II as this name form was listed in the 

Initiation Notice separately from the Evraz single 

entity. As the two names differ only by the 

abbreviation of Corporation to Corp., we find them 

to be the same company, and thus, have not listed 

the abbreviated form in Appendix II of this notice. 

12See Appendix II. 

13See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

14For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

15 Id. 16See Order. 

Exporter or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Evraz Inc. NA11 .......................... 15.29 

Non-Examined Companies 12 ..... 15.29 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Commerce determined, and CBP shall 

assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with these 

final results of review.13

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), as 

Evraz reported that it is the importer of 

record for all its U.S. sales and it 

reported the entered value of those 

sales, we calculated importer-specific 

ad valorem duty assessment rates based 

on the ratio of the total amount of 

dumping calculated for the examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

sales. Where the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Evraz for which the company did not 

know that the merchandise it sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.14

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

intend to direct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties at a rate equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

determined for those companies in the 

final results. 

For the company that certified it had 

no shipments, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate any existing entries of subject 

merchandise produced by it, but 

exported by other parties, at the rate for 

the intermediate reseller, if available, or 

at the all-others rate, consistent with 

Commerce’s reseller policy.15

Commerce intends to issue 

liquidation instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 41 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be in effect for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

listed above will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin that 

is established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

companies not subject to this review, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recently completed segment of 

this proceeding in which the company 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original LTFV 

investigation, but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of the proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers and exporters will continue 

to be 12.32 percent ad valorem, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation.16

These cash deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during the POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 28, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes to the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether To Apply Partial 

Adverse Facts Available to Structural 

Pipe Cost 

Comment 2: Whether To Revise Certain 

Affiliated Supplier Adjustments 

Comment 3: Whether To Correct a Clerical 

Error Regarding Home Market and U.S. 

Sales 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices 6499 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

35481 (July 6, 2021). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the 2020–2021 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Germany,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

3See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Austria, Belgium, France, the 

Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for 

France, the Federal Republic of Germany, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan, and Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 82 FR 24096, 24098 (May 25, 2017) 

(Order). 

4For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 5See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 6See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 7Commerce is exercising its discretion, under 19 

CFR 351.309(d)(1), to alter the time limit for filing 

of rebuttal briefs. 

Comment 4: Whether To Recalculate Home 

Market Credit Expenses Using Invoice 

Date 

Comment 5: Whether Antidumping Duty 

Revenue is an Addition to Gross Unit 

Price 

Comment 6: Whether To Cap MovementRelated Revenues by the Corresponding 

Expenses 

Comment 7: Whether Section 232 Duties 

can be Lawfully Deducted From the 

Export Price 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

1. Aciers Lague Steels Inc 

2. Acier Profile SBB Inc 

3. Amdor Inc 

4. BPC Services Group 

5. Bri-Steel Manufacturing 

6. Canada Culvert 

7. Cappco Tubular Products Canada Inc 

8. CFI Metal Inc 

9. Dominion Pipe & Piling 

10. Enduro Canada Pipeline Services 

11. Fi Oilfield Services Canada 

12. Forterra 

13. Gchem Ltd 

14. Graham Construction 

15. Groupe Fordia Inc 

16. Grupo Fordia Inc 

17. Hodgson Custom Rolling 

18. Hyprescon Inc 

19. Interpipe Inc 

20. K K Recycling Services 

21. Kobelt Manufacturing Co 

22. Labrie Environment 

23. Les Aciers Sofatec 

24. Lorenz Conveying P 

25. Lorenz Conveying Products 

26. Matrix Manufacturing 

27. MBI Produits De Forge 

28. Nor Arc 

29. Peak Drilling Ltd 

30. Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd 

31. Pipe & Piling Supplies 

32. Prudental 

33. Prudential 

34. Shaw Pipe Protecction 

35. Shaw Pipe Protection 

36. Tenaris Algoma Tubes Facility 

37. Tenaris Prudential 

38. Welded Tube of Can Ltd 

[FR Doc. 2022–02353 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–428–844] 

Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-toLength Plate From Germany: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that certain carbon and alloy steel cutto-length plate (CTL plate) from 

Germany is not being, or is not likely to 

be, sold in the United States at less than 

normal value (NV) during the period of 

review (POR) May 1, 2020, through 

April 30, 2021. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4136. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 6, 2021, based on a timely 

request for review, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an 

administrative review on CTL plate 

from Germany.1 This review covers one 

producer/exporter of the subject 

merchandise, AG der Dillinger 

Hu ̈ttenwerke (Dillinger). For a complete 

description of the events that followed 

the initiation of this review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 3

The products covered by the Order 

are certain carbon and alloy steel hotrolled or forged flat plate products not 

in coils, whether or not painted, 

varnished, or coated with plastics or 

other non-metallic substances from 

Germany. Products subject to the Order 

are currently classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) under item 

numbers: 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 

7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 

7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 

7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 

7211.14.0045, 7225.40.1110, 

7225.40.1180, 7225.40.3005, 

7225.40.3050, 7226.20.0000, and 

7226.91.5000. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to this scope is dispositive.4

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) 

and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Export price is 

calculated in accordance with section 

772 of the Act. NV is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list 

of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as an appendix to this notice. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margin exists for the respondent for the 

period May 1, 2020, through April 30, 

2021: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

AG der Dillinger Hu ̈ttenwerke ..... 0.00 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice.5

Interested parties may submit case briefs 

to Commerce no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice.6

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed no later 

than seven days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs.7 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1