alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVE D NOVEMBE R19 , 201 0

U S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH E MATTERO F 

### S I PIN G YE FA A DOCKE T N o CPlOEAOO l 1 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S FAA-2010-097 6 ORDE R O F DISMISSA L 

### OERARTMEN TO F rHNSPORIATlO N '-;" TOPERATION S :! 9 MO V i qp 2 : 3 S

Th e Complain t

o f Complainan t

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (hereinafte r "Complainant" ) wa s file do n Octobe r 1 , 2010 . Responden t

S i Pin g Y e (hereinafte r "Respondent" ) ha dfile daReques t for Hearin g o n Septembe r

22 , 2010 . O n Novembe r

3 , 2010 , Responden t

withdre w it s Reques t

fo r Hearin g an d requeste ddismissal , citin g settlement . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : "A t an y tim e befor e o r

durin g ahearing , an agenc y attorne y may withdra w acomplain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t fo r ahearin g withou t th e consen t

o f th e administrativ e law judge . If a n agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

o r apart y withdraw s th e reques t for ahearin g an dth e answer , th e administrativ e law judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s imde r thi s subpart with prejudice. " WHEREFORE , th e withi n file dWithdrawa l o f Reques t fo r Hearin g havin g bee n rea dan dconsidered , i t

i s ORDERE D a s follows : 1 . Respondent' s Withdrawa l o f Reques t for Hearin g b e an di s hereb y granted ; an d

### ::r . 

# m w h

2 . Thi s proceedin g b e eei dijs , wit

h prejudipe .

Attachmen

t - Servic e Lis t odwin trativ e La w Judg e

f "



### i I •

• ' MFA A Docke t No . CPlOEAOOl 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Robert H . London , Respondent' s Counse l La w Office s o f

Robert H . Londo n 955 0 Flai r

Drive , Suit e 30 1 El Monte , C A 9173 1 TEL : 626-575-920 0 Leoni dTalisman , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

Regiona l Counse l Eastern Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-340 3 FAX: ' 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Building , Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the following address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1298 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1298

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                Marshal Roberts Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2021

 Mr. Hern (for himself and Mr. Mullin) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
                Marshal Roberts Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MARSHAL ROBERTS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
H.F., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4845

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 01, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Form 10-K and is qualifiedi in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         569,677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               569,677
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 569,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          569,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   569,677
<SALES>                                        451,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               451,603
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               491,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,302)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.71)


</TABLE>
Rufus ANDERSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4079

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 76 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 76

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Health 
    and Human Services relating to ``Ensuring Access to Equitable, 
    Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2022

 Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas (for himself, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. 
 Banks, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Pfluger, Mr. Huizenga, Mrs. Hinson, 
  Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. McKinley, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Hudson, Mr. 
 Norman, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. Fitzgerald, 
  Mr. Weber of Texas, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Barr, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. 
 Mast, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Guest, Mr. Allen, Mr. 
  Moolenaar, Mr. Long, Mr. Estes, Ms. Foxx, Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Smith of 
Nebraska, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Babin, Mr. Rose, Mr. Bentz, Mr. Smucker, Mr. 
Donalds, Mr. Carl, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Jackson, 
 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Wenstrup, Mr. Graves 
 of Louisiana, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Cline, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Crawford, and 
Mr. Bost) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Health 
    and Human Services relating to ``Ensuring Access to Equitable, 
    Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Health and Human Services relating 
to ``Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality 
Family Planning Services'' (86 Fed. Reg. 56144 (October 7, 2021)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Thomas RICHARDSON

NO. 2018-KK-0543

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2018

Denied.
Seth SKLAREY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CITY OF MIAMI, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1958

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS 

United States of America 

-vs- Case No. 2:18-mj-578 

 

Franklin Eugene Perry 

 COURTROOM MINUTES 

JUDGE: Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers DATE AND TIME: 8/13/2018 at 1:30 pm

DEPUTY CLERK: Allie Moran COUNSEL FOR GOVT: Heather Hill 

RECORD: CourtSmart COUNSEL FOR DEFT(S). Terry Sherman 

INTERPRETER: PRETRIAL/PROBATION: Letitia Vasquez-Villa

Initial Appearance 

-Dft advised of rights, penalties, and charges 

-Financial affidavit submitted, CJA Panel Attorney Terry Sherman appointed with Pretrial 

Services to retrieve more information to aid in determining final CJA eligibility 

-Detention Hearing set for 8/16/2018 at 3:00 PM, Preliminary Hearing set for 8/24/2018 at 11:30 

AM 

-Dft remanded to custody of USMS 

Case: 2:18-mj-00578-EPD Doc #: 5 Filed: 08/13/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000799233
<NAME>                        Heartland Express, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         143,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                       403
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,253
<PP&E>                                         129,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     186,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,828
<SALES>                                        263,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               263,489
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  217,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,937
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,828
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                          11,755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                       638
<INVENTORY>                                     52,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,916
<PP&E>                                         349,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 515,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,409
<BONDS>                                        227,712
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           355
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   515,463
<SALES>                                        552,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               552,194
<CGS>                                          420,324
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,344
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (277)
<CHANGES>                                      (3,040)
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,027
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13


</TABLE>
Stephen SMITH, Appellant, v. Michael James WINER, individually and Winer & Associates, P.A., Appellees.

No. 4D17-2255

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2018]

Stephen Smith, Sunrise, pro se.

Michael Winer of The Law Office of Michael Winer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

*1014*Affirmed.* Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

Warner, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
#### IN RE: Franklin C. SMITH, Petitioner.

No. 16-1912

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

Franklin C. Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Franklin C. Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the Social Security Administration (SSA) to reinstate disability benefits. However, Smith presents no evidence that he exhausted administrative procedures prior to filing this petition. See Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 328, 96 S.Ct. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976). Absent exhaustion of administrative procedures, courts maintain jurisdiction over a petition for a writ of mandamus only if the petitioner establishes that “the administrative process normally available is not accessible” because the agency fails *787or refuses to act. U.S. ex rel. Rahman v. Oncology Assocs., P.G., 198 F.3d 502, 515 (4th Cir. 1999). Smith has not demonstrated that the SSA has refused to consider his case, and we therefore do not have jurisdiction to consider Smith’s petition.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Smith’s motions to compel and dismiss his mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 124 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide incentives for 

education on the risk of renal medullary carcinoma in individuals who 

are receiving medical assistance under such title and who have Sickle 

Cell Disease. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

incentives for education on the risk of renal medullary 

carcinoma in individuals who are receiving medical assistance under such title and who have Sickle Cell Disease. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Byron Nash Renal 

5 Medullary Carcinoma Awareness Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 124 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING INCENTIVES FOR EDUCATION ON RISK 

2 OF RENAL MEDULLARY CARCINOMA TO INDI3 VIDUALS WITH SICKLE CELL DISEASE UNDER 

4 MEDICAID. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1903(a)(3)(E)(ii) of the 

6 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(a)(3)(E)(ii)) is 

7 amended by inserting ‘‘, renal medullary carcinoma,’’ after 

8 ‘‘stroke’’ each place it appears. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to items and serv11 ices furnished on or after the date of the enactment of 

12 this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Lynton BALLENTINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JAMES B. NUTTER & COMPANY; Hutchens Law Firm, LP; Jonathan Caleb Rogers; Shann Rose Schmidt; Claire Collins; North Carolina Housing Finance Agency; Holly Robinson; Surety Insurance Company; Karen Bumgardner, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-1674

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

Lynton Ballentine, Appellant Pro Se. Brian D. Boone, Alston *&*Bird, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Lacey Meredith Moore, Hutchens Law Firm, Charlotte, North Carolina; Kacy Lynn Hunt, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth C. Stone, Williams Mullen, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lynton Ballentine appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ballentine v. James B. Nutter & Co., No. 3:15-cv-00496-FDW-DSC, 2016 WL 3095224 (W.D.N.C. June 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Joseph Edward RENNE, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kenneth D. HODGES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, et al., Respondents.

No. 1D18-0313

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 21, 2018

Kenneth D. Hodges, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1433 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1433

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2022

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reauthorize the Helen Keller National Center for Youths and Adults 
                          Who Are Deaf-Blind.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helen Keller National Center 
Reauthorization Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER REAUTHORIZED.

    The first sentence of section 205(a) of the Helen Keller National 
Center Act (29 U.S.C. 1904(a)) is amended by striking ``1999 through 
2003'' and inserting ``2023 through 2027''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Kevin F. McCumber,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
### STATE OFLOUISIANA VERSUS CARLTEZ HART 

### NO. 

### 2023 KW0720 

## OCTOBER10, 2023

In Re: Carltez Hart, applying 

### for supervisory writs, 

### 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 

### 2201759. BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.



### WRIT DENIED. PMC CHH SMM