alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# E **C** 

# / **R Inco rporated**  **Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989**

1 **MEMORANDUM TO:**  Bruce Moore , EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/FIG **FROM:** David Hendricks , EC/R, Inc. **DATE:** December 19 , 201 4 **SUBJECT:** Summary

of the September 9, 2014 , Meeting with the Gas Processors Association (GP A) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to D iscuss the Proposed Reconsideration of Additional Provisions of the Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission and Distribution NSPS **I. INTRODUCTION**  The GP A requested this meeting with the EPA to discuss the comments GPA submitted on the proposed amendments to the Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission and Distribution NSPS (40 CFR Part 60, subpart OOOO). This meeting summary will be available in the docket for this rulemaking (Docket ID No. EPA
- HQ - OAR- 20 1 0 - 0 50 5 ). The proposed rule wa s published in the Federal Register on July 17, 2014 (7 9 FR 41752 ). **II. ATTENDEES**  The following is a list of participants in the meeting. **U.S. Environmental Protection Agency** David Cozzie Bruce Moore Chris Frantz Matthew Witos ky **Gas Processors**  **Association** Jeff Applekamp, GPA Jeff Adams, BP Laura Higgins, DCP Midstream Mary Beth Whitfield, Williams Companies Tom Bach, Kinder Morgan Doug Jordan, Southwestern Energy Grover Campbell, Devon Energy Jim McCarthy, consultant2

**EC/R Inc orporated**  Veronica Hanzel (b y phone) **III. SUMMARY OF**  **DISCUSSION** Bruce Moore opened the meeting b y stating that the proposed rule is currently in the post
proposal period and the EPA can answer clarifying questions from the group, but cannot provide any responses to comments on the proposed rules. The GPA discussed each of the comments they submitted to the EPA on the proposal and further clarified their position. The topics discussed include the following:

 Definition of “removed from service” under § 60.5430  Applicability

status of storage vessels removed from service under §60.5365  Sufficient time for well completions to come into compliance under §60.5395(d)(1)(i)  Clarification of requirements for storage vessels returned to service  Clarification of leak free requirement for enclosed combustion devices under §§60.5413(e)(7) and 60.5412(d)(1)(i)  Compliance requirements for reciprocating compressors under § § 60.5385(a)(3) , 60.5410(c)(1) and 60.5415(c)(4)  Applicability

of cover and closed vent requirement s to reciprocating compressors under §60.5416(a) and (b)  Definition of “responsible official” under §60.5430  Consistency

between the pneumatic controller affected facility definition in §60.5365(d) and the requirements of §60.5390  Use of electronic spark i gnition systems for combustion control devices  Miscellaneous technical corrections The EPA thanked the attendees for providing this information and stated that they will review the submitted comments to respond to these issues.
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                     JURISDICTION
------------------                                     ------------
<S>                                                    <C>
J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company                   Colorado       
J.D. Edwards World Source Company                      Colorado       
J.D. Edwards Netherlands B.V., Baarn                   Netherlands    
J.D. Edwards (U.K.) Ltd.                               United Kingdom 
J.D. Edwards France SA                                 France         
J.D. Edwards Deutschland GmbH                          Germany        
J.D. Edwards Italia S.p.A.                             Italy          
J.D. Edwards (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.                     Singapore      
Nippon J.D. Edwards                                    Japan          
J.D. Edwards de Mexico y Compania en N.C. de C.V.      Mexico         
J.D. Edwards Brasil Limitada                           Brazil         
J.D. Edwards Canada Ltd.                               Canada         
J.D. Edwards S.A. (Proprietary) Limited                South Africa   
J.D. Edwards (Hong Kong) Limited                       Hong Kong      
J.D. Edwards (China) Software Systems Co., Ltd.        China          
J.D. Edwards Austria GmbH                              Austria        
J.D. Edwards Shanghai Co., Ltd.                        Shanghai       
J.D. Edwards (Schweiz) AG                              Switzerland    
J.D. Edwards World Solutions Australia                 Australia
J.D. Edwards & Company Foreign Sales, Inc.             Barbados       
                                                       
</TABLE>

World Technology Services LLC (J.D. Edwards & Company is a 50% owner of this
company)
EX-10.14






EXHIBIT 10.14




AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

TO THE IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

1999 OUTSIDE DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

(As Amended Effective January 1, 2005)




     This Amendment Number One to the Irwin Financial Corporation 1999 Outside Director
Restricted Stock Compensation Plan (this “Amendment”) is effective as of January 1, 2005 (the
“Effective Date”).



     Whereas, Irwin Financial Corporation (the “Company”) has implemented the Irwin
Financial Corporation 1999 Outside Director Restricted Stock Compensation Plan (the “Original
Plan”); and



     Whereas, the Company desires to amend the Original Plan so that it is clear that the
Original Plan is not subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.



     The words “As soon as practicable after” at the beginning of Section 6(c)(i) and 6(c)(ii) of
the Original Plan are here by deleted and replaced with the word “On”.



     Section 6(c)(v) of the Original Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety.



     The first sentence of Section 6(g) of the Original Plan is deleted in its entirety.



     Except as specifically amended herein, all other terms and conditions contained in the
Original Plan shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect.



[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank.]




 









 








     In Witness Whereof, the Board of Directors has caused this Amendment Number One
to the Irwin Financial Corporation 1999 Outside Director Restricted Stock Compensation Plan to
be amended effective as of the Effective Date.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Printed:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Its:
EX PARTE Edmond Hudmond SMITH IV

CR-16-0239

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2017 Reh. denied March 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7536

JAIRUS TYRONE HENLEY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. MIKE SLAGEL , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv - 00473

- FDW )

Submitted : August 25, 2020 Decided: September 10, 2020

Before AGEE, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jairus Tyrone Henley , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jairus Tyrone Henley seeks to appeal the district court ’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substan tial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that t he petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Henley has no t made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132218 

(70)

(71) 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

MARY ELLEN McDONALD,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 Justices 

v SC: 132218 

 COA: 259168 

Genesee CC: 03-076398-NF 

FARM BUREAU INSURANCE CO,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion to strike appellant’s reply brief and supplement 

to appendix and the motion to expand the record on appeal are considered, and the 

motion to strike appellant’s reply brief and supplement to appendix is DENIED. The 

motion to expand the record on appeal is GRANTED. 

l0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
Michael D. HUTCHISON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. James HUTCHISON, as Personal Representative, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4474

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

March 29, 2013

 JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

 DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

 JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

No. 12-2484 v. 

OLLIE PETERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 11 CR 517

James B. Zagel,

Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion issued in the above-entitled case on March 28, 2013, is hereby

amended as follows:

On page 9, line 6, the second “to the” should be removed from the sentence. 

The sentence should read: “There, we explained that the defendant could

have raised his objection to the probation officer’s recommendation before

sentencing, during the sentencing hearing, or in a post-sentencing motion.”
<PAGE>

     EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Russell P. Fradin, the Chief Executive Officer of The BISYS Group, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q/A
of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form
10-Q/A"), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: August 9, 2004

                                                          /s/ Russell P. Fradin
                                                         -----------------------
                                                          Russell P. Fradin



<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, James L. Fox, the Chief Financial Officer of The BISYS Group, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q/A
of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form
10-Q/A"), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: August 9, 2004

                                                      /s/ James L. Fox
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                      James L. Fox
Lazaro C. BONARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2298

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

----

----

----

|         If to      Employer:         CytRx      Corporation        11726      San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 650        Los      Angeles, California  90049        Facsimile:                                (310)      826-5529        Attention:                                Chief      Executive Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          If to      Employee:         __________________        __________________        __________________                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

----

|   | “EMPLOYER” CytRx      Corporation  By: /s/ STEVEN A.      KRIEGSMANSteven A.KriegsmanChief Executive      Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   “EMPLOYEE”  /s/ SCOTT      WIELAND                                                               Scott      Wieland |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1169 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1169

 To prohibit all United States assessed and voluntary contributions to 
  the United Nations until such time as the membership in the United 
    Nations of the People's Republic of China is terminated and the 
  Republic of China (Taiwan) is afforded full rights, privileges, and 
responsibilities as a Member State in the United Nations, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

  Mr. Perry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit all United States assessed and voluntary contributions to 
  the United Nations until such time as the membership in the United 
    Nations of the People's Republic of China is terminated and the 
  Republic of China (Taiwan) is afforded full rights, privileges, and 
responsibilities as a Member State in the United Nations, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taiwan Voice Act''.

SEC. 2. MEMBERSHIP OF TAIWAN AT THE UNITED NATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States 
shall withhold all assessed and voluntary contributions to the United 
Nations until such time as the membership of the People's Republic of 
China in the World Health Organization is terminated and the Republic 
of China (Taiwan) is afforded full rights, privileges, and 
responsibilities as a Member State in the United Nations.
    (b) Presidential Action.--The President is authorized to take any 
appropriate action to carry out subsection (a).
    (c) Actions at the World Health Organization.--The President shall 
direct the United States representative to the World Health 
Organization to use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States 
at the World Health Organization to encourage Members States of the 
United Nations to take actions identical or similar to the action 
described in subsection (a).
    (d) No Effect on the United States in the World Health 
Organization.--United States membership in the United Nations shall not 
be affected in any way by any action under this section.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136181 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136181 

 COA: 282525 

Genesee CC: 03-011521-FC 

MONTEZ LEONDRE COOPER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1287 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 

to extend the authorization of the South Carolina National Heritage 

Corridor, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2021 

Mr. CLYBURN (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. DUNCAN, and 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to extend the authorization of the 

South Carolina National Heritage Corridor, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF SOUTH 

4 CAROLINA NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR. 

5 Division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 

6 Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333) is 

7 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1287 IH

1 (1) in section 607, by striking ‘‘2019’’ and in2 serting ‘‘2031’’; and 

3 (2) in section 608(a), by striking 

4 ‘‘$17,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000,000’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           DURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
                STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED       NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                        SEPTEMBER 30,           SEPTEMBER 30,
                                     -------------------     -------------------
                                      1995        1996        1995        1996
                                     -------     -------     -------     -------
<S>                                  <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>    
PRIMARY NET INCOME PER
SHARE
NET INCOME                           $ 1,767     $ 5,806     $ 4,435     $14,471
                                     =======     =======     =======     =======

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER
OF COMMON AND COMMON
EQUIVALENT SHARES:
  Common stock                        23,816      37,543      21,938      34,258
  Stock options                        2,172       1,725       2,028       1,785
  Warrants                             4,126       2,998       3,358       2,847
                                     -------     -------     -------     -------
    Total                             30,114      42,266      27,324      38,890
                                     =======     =======     =======     =======

NET INCOME PER SHARE                 $  0.06     $  0.14     $  0.16     $  0.37
                                     =======     =======     =======     =======

FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME
PER SHARE:
NET INCOME                           $ 1,767     $ 5,806     $ 4,435     $14,471
                                     =======     =======     =======     ======= 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
OF COMMON AND COMMON
EQUIVALENT SHARES ASSUMING
ISSUANCE OF ALL DILUTIVE
CONTINGENT SHARES:
  Common stock                        23,814      37,543      21,938      34,258
  Stock options                        2,317       1,842       2,446       1,987
  Warrants                             4,419       3,312       4,266       3,412
                                     -------     -------     -------     -------
    Total                             30,550      42,697      28,650      39,657
                                     =======     =======     =======     =======

NET INCOME PER SHARE                 $  0.06     $  0.14     $  0.15     $  0.36
                                     =======     =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>

(1) The per share data and weighted average number of common and common
equivalents shares have been adjusted to reflect the 100% stock dividend
effective July 1, 1996.