alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1454 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require firearm assembly kits 

to be considered to be firearms. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. COHEN, 

Mr. SWALWELL, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. 

WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. SOTO, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. 

DEAN, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Georgia, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. CASE, Mr. EVANS, Mr. MEEKS, 

Ms. MENG, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. 

RYAN, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. GARCIA of 

Texas, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Ms. CLARKE of New 

York, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. MORELLE, Ms. WEXTON, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. CHU, Mrs. 

DEMINGS, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. GARAMENDI, Ms. TLAIB, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. 

GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. POCAN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. KEATING, Mrs. 

TORRES of California, Ms. SCANLON, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. 

BROWN, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. 

BARRAGA ́N, Ms. PINGREE, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. AGUILAR, Mr. 

LEVIN of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. JAYAPAL, Ms. PORTER, Mr. 

VARGAS, Ms. BROWNLEY, Mr. TRONE, Mr. LIEU, Mr. SEAN PATRICK

MALONEY of New York, Ms. SHERRILL, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. CARSON, 

Mr. NEGUSE, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. CORREA, Mrs. HAYES, and Ms. STRICKLAND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require firearm 

assembly kits to be considered to be firearms. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1454 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ghost Guns Are Guns 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FIREARM ASSEMBLY KITS CONSIDERED TO BE 

7 FIREARMS. 

8 Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘or (D) any 

11 destructive device’’ and inserting ‘‘; (D) any destruc12 tive device; or (E) any combination of parts designed 

13 or intended for use in converting any device into a 

14 firearm and from which a firearm may be readily as15 sembled’’; and 

16 (2) in paragraph (4)— 

17 (A) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub18 paragraph (A); 

19 (B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub20 paragraph (B) and inserting a period; and 

21 (C) by striking subparagraph (C). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Willie SAFFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3785

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
James H. SCHARFSCHWERDT, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2593

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      Exhibit 27

                     THE BISYS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of The BISYS Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries for
the nine months ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1,000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                          JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                            MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                       57,566
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                65,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  2,077
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  0
<PP&E>                                                       57,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                               26,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              244,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        60,702
<BONDS>                                                       1,605
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                        503
<OTHER-SE>                                                  176,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                176,609
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            231,153
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               125,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             10,345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              1,068
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           71,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              45,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 18,385
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          27,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 27,575
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  1.05
        


</TABLE>
David F. GARBER, Appellant, v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC f/k/a Green Tree Servicing LLC; Woody S. Ryan a/k/a Woody S. Wichtendahl; Kim E. Alvis; Nancy E. Alvis; Garber, Hooley & Holloway, Llp ; John Holloway ; Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A.; Livingston, Patterson, Strickland & Siegel, P.A. ; Suntrust Bank; and any and all unknown parties claiming by, through, under, and against the herein named individual defendant(s) who are not known to be dead or alive, whether said unknown parties may claim an interest as spouses, heirs, devisees, grantees, or other claimants, appellees.

Case No. 2D16-3089

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman, President, and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
August 13, 2008/s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithExecutive Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 13, 2008
Jakari Okalawon CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2168

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
( 

\ 

!~ 

FILED 

JUN 2 2 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

HERBERT D. PHIPPS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Civil Action No. 

ERIC HOLDER, 

U.S. Attorney General, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

12 1026 

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis 

and his pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint. 

It appears that the plaintiff is serving a term of imprisonment imposed by the United 

States District for the Southern District of Indiana upon his conviction for conspiracy to 

distribute methamphetamine. See Compl. at 4. He claims that the statute under which he was 

prosecuted and sentenced "was never been passed by Congress," id. at 5, rendering the "Federal 

Indictment ... invalid," id. at 8, and causing him "to be ... falsely imprisoned." !d. The 

plaintiff brings a claim against the Attorney General under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents 

of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971 ), 1 and asks the Court to declare the 

statutes invalid and to order his immediate release. Compl. at 43-44. 

The Court construes the complaint as a challenge to the legality of the plaintiffs criminal 

sentence. He must present such a claim to the sentencing court in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 

2255. Taylor v. US. Bd. of Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C. Cir. 1952) (stating that a motion 

Bivens recognized a cause of action for damages against federal officials acting under 

color of their authority who violate a claimant's constitutional rights. 

/ 

1 
under Section 2255 is the proper vehicle for challenging the constitutionality of a statute under 

which a defendant is convicted). Section 2255 provides specifically that: 

[a] prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act 

of Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that 

the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws 

of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to 

impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the 

maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral 

attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, 

set aside or correct the sentence. 

28 U.S.C. § 2255(a) (emphasis added). 

Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint. An Order accompanies this 

Memorandum Opinion. 

United States District Judge
Michael Keith GOOGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4854

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernesto VAZQUEZ-AMPARAN, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51430 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 11, 2017

Joseph H, Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Kristin Michelle Kimmelman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ernesto Vazquez-Amparan pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States and was sentenced to 30 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. On appeal, he argues that his indictment did not allege that he had a *77prior conviction, and therefore, it was a violation of his due process rights for the district court to impose a sentence under 8 U.S.C, § 1326(b). He contends that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum sentence under § 1326(a).

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance because Vazquez-Amparan’s argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). As Vazquez-Amparan concedes that his argument is foreclosed and is raised only to preserve it for further review, a summary affirmance is appropriate. *See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis,*406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. The judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
John E. TURNER and Belinda Turner, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2421

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Patricia MICHALSKI, DOC# H36258, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1871

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned,  John D. White, Chief Financial Officer of Lone Star Steakhouse
& Saloon, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to
his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 14,  2005 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ John D. White
                                             ---------------------
                                             John D. White
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             July 25, 2005
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,233,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                   903,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,786,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,924,481
<PP&E>                                      45,539,363
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,309,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,205,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,350,133
<BONDS>                                     22,579,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        7,700,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       198,111
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,377,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,205,884
<SALES>                                     49,759,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,759,285
<CGS>                                       37,333,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,761,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,034,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,359,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,396,493)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,396,493)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,913,836)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
Roosevelt Jean LOUIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1425

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

Roosevelt Jean Louis, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Maxwell v. State*, 69 So.3d 1122 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) ; *Wesley v. State*, 126 So.3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ; *Ross v. State*, 82 So.3d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ; *Harricharan v. State*, 59 So.3d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). *See also* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(2) (no motion filed under this rule shall be considered if filed more than two years after the judgment and sentence become final unless the motion alleges, inter alia, that "the fundamental constitutional right asserted was not established within the period provided for herein and has been held to apply retroactively, and the claim is made within 2 years of the date of the mandate of the decision announcing the retroactivity").
December 22, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PNS STORES, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-14-00319-CV V.

RENE MUNGUIA, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Rene 

Munguia, signed January 31, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for 

proceedings in accordance with the court’s opinion. If, however, Munguia files in 

this Court a remittitur of $3,583.57 within twenty days after the issuance of our 

opinion, we instead will modify the trial court’s judgment to reduce the award of 

past medical expenses to $18,916.43 and affirm the trial court’s judgment as 

modified.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee Rene Munguia.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1121 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1121

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the contempt 
        authority of immigration judges, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

Mr. Gallagher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the contempt 
        authority of immigration judges, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Empowering Immigration Courts Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTEMPT AUTHORITY OF IMMIGRATION JUDGES.

    Section 240(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1229a(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``(under regulations prescribed by 
the Attorney General) to sanction by civil money penalty any action (or 
inaction) in contempt of the judge's proper exercise of authority under 
this Act'' and inserting ``to sanction by fine contempt of its 
authority in accordance with section 401 of title 18, United States 
Code''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Debra F. MEADOWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLES COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION; Keller III Bus Service Incorporated, Keller Jr. Owner/President of School Board; Helen E. Keller, Owner; Keller Transportation Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1586

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 17, 2017

Decided: August 21, 2017

Debra F. Meadows, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maiyland; Mark Jay Swerdlin, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

On May 1, 2017, Debra F. Meadows filed a notice of appeal in her pending civil case that did not clearly state the order she sought to appeal. In her informal brief, Meadows references the magistrate judge’s January 25, 2017, order denying her motion for a protective order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Meadows seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Meadows’ motion for oral argument and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 16



Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

March 25, 2002





Dear Sir / Madam:

We have read the first 4 paragraphs of Item 9 included in the December 31, 2001
Form 10-K of Argonaut Group, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and are in agreement with the statements contained therein.

Very truly yours,

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



/s/ John W. Donovan
By
John W. Donovan



Copy to:
Mr. Mark W. Haushill, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Argonaut Group, Inc.