alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

I, George R. Aylward, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 4, 2009



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/S/ GEORGE R. AYLWARD                          
|George R. Aylward                              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director



25
Alfred Washington J. CERUTTI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-112

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
#### Waggoner v Waggoner,

No. 91791;

Court of Appeals No. 134070.
Michael BORDERS, DOC #U11417 Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2792

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 98 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2022 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make a correction 

in the enrollment of the bill S. 3373. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 3373, 

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following corVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:02 Jan 04, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC98.RDS HC98

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 98 RDS 

1 rection: Amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to 

2 improve health care and benefits for veterans exposed to 

3 toxic substances, and for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ELECTRICITY PRICE PROJECTIONS

LIST OF PROJECTIONS : -

1 Constant 19992 AEO 2000 - Reference Case3 GRI 19984 AEO 2000 - High Growth Case5 AEO 2000 - Low Growth

Electricity Price Projections Electricity Price Trends

Const. AEO2000 GRI 98 High Low Const. AEO2000 GRI 98 High 

cents / kWh (in 1998 dollar)

1995 8.82 8.82 8.82 8.82 8.821996 8.63 8.63 8.63 8.63 8.631997 8.38 8.38 8.38 8.38 8.38 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1998 8.05 8.05 8.05 8.05 8.05 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1999 7.92 7.92 7.92 7.92 7.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 2000 7.92 7.86 8.50 7.98 7.85 0.95 0.94 1.01 0.95 2001 7.92 7.74 8.38 7.83 7.71 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.93 2002 7.92 7.63 8.27 7.77 7.56 0.95 0.91 0.99 0.93 2003 7.92 7.59 8.15 7.77 7.52 0.95 0.91 0.97 0.93 2004 7.92 7.56 8.03 7.78 7.46 0.95 0.90 0.96 0.93 2005 7.92 7.47 7.92 7.72 7.37 0.95 0.89 0.94 0.92 2006 7.92 7.48 7.82 7.76 7.32 0.95 0.89 0.93 0.93 2007 7.92 7.48 7.73 7.76 7.29 0.95 0.89 0.92 0.93 2008 7.92 7.46 7.64 7.71 7.22 0.95 0.89 0.91 0.92 2009 7.92 7.37 7.54 7.66 7.15 0.95 0.88 0.90 0.91 2010 7.92 7.39 7.45 7.71 7.13 0.95 0.88 0.89 0.92 2011 7.92 7.33 7.39 7.63 7.07 0.95 0.87 0.88 0.91 2012 7.92 7.30 7.32 7.62 7.03 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.91 2013 7.92 7.29 7.26 7.60 7.00 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.91 2014 7.92 7.32 7.20 7.61 7.01 0.95 0.87 0.86 0.91 2015 7.92 7.33 7.14 7.63 7.02 0.95 0.88 0.85 0.91 2016 7.92 7.32 7.14 7.62 7.01 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2017 7.92 7.32 7.14 7.60 7.00 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2018 7.92 7.32 7.14 7.63 7.02 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2019 7.92 7.29 7.14 7.59 7.01 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2020 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2021 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2022 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2023 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2024 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2025 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2026 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2027 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2028 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2029 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 2030 7.92 7.28 7.14 7.61 6.99 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.91 

2021-2030 Electricity price are kept constant after 2020 for AEO 2000 Reference, High Growth and Low Growth Case

2016-2030 Electricity price are kept constant after 2015 for GRI 1998
#### Bender vs. Bridge & Co.

It is error to issue a joint ■writ of garnishment against several, with allegations of a several instead of a joint indebtedness.

*Error to Pulaski Circuit Court.*

The Hon. John J. Clendenin, Circuit Judge.

Watkins’ & Gallagher for the plaintiff.

Bertrand for the defendants.

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This cause was brought here by writ of error to the Pulaski Circuit Court, sued out by Bender. The facts of the case, in all that is material to the point of law involved, are the same, as in the case of the *Cincinnati and Little Rock Slate Co. vs. Bridge**292& *Co.,*(17 *Ark. R. p.*) following the cases of *Thorn*& *Robins vs. Woodruff et al.,*5 *Ark. R.*55, and *Moreland et al. vs. Pelham, 2 Eng. R.*338.

Upon the authority of these cases, the judgment in question must be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Silberstein Ungar, PLLCCPAs and Business Advisors


Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com





March 26, 2010








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors


Cascade Wind Corp., Inc.


Portland, Oregon





To Whom It May Concern:





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K,Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by Cascade Wind Corp., Inc. of our report dated March 23, 2010, relating to the financial statements of Cascade Wind Corp., Inc., a
Nevada Corporation, as of and for the periods ending February 28, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from October 3, 2008 (inception) to February 28, 2010.





Sincerely,





/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Bingham Farms, Michigan
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10(e)(44)


2019 Executive Long-Term Incentive Program (“2019 E-LTIP”)




Under the 2019 E-LTIP, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive shares based on (i)
satisfying certain performance measures established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (performance shares) for 60% of the award and (ii) continued service only (restricted stock units) for 40% of the award.


The 2019 E-LTIP performance measures and corresponding weightings are as follows: 


(i) (25%) Absolute Revenue1: Total revenue measured on a cumulative basis for the three-year performance period as reported in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, unadjusted for currency.  
(ii) (25%) Free Cash Flow1:  Net Cash provided by (used in) Operating Activities of Continuing Operations, less capital expenditures (inclusive of internal use software), measured on a cumulative basis for the three-year performance period, both as reported in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, as adjusted annually for the following items:
		
	1)
	Costs related to acquisition, separation or divestiture to the extent any such item qualifies for separate line item disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of income in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles consistently applied; 


		
	2)
	Cash impacts from the following:


		
	•
	Items individually identified within Other Expenses, net, (except for interest, currency and asset sales) and to the extent the amount is greater than $10 million pre-tax. If any such item qualifies for separate line item disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of income in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles consistently applied, then such item will also warrant adjustment; 


		
	•
	Gains/(losses) from the settlement of tax audits or changes in enacted tax law (to the extent the amount is greater than $10 million pre-tax);


		
	•
	Gains/(losses) resulting from acts of war, terrorism or natural disasters (to the extent the amount is greater than $10 million pre-tax); 


		
	3)
	Cash payments for restructurings in excess of or less than the amount reported as current restructuring reserves in the preceding year’s Annual Report; 


		
	4)
	Pension contributions in excess of or less than the planned amounts for each year;


		
	5)
	Impact of changes in receivables factoring programs as compared to total amount factored as of the previous year end.




(iii) (50%) Absolute Share Price: Share price will be measured based on the average of the closing price on the final twenty trading days of the performance period, inclusive of dividends during the three-year performance period.








1 Absolute Revenue and Free Cash Flow will be adjusted for:
		
	1)
	Impacts of any individual acquisition in excess of $500 million purchase price; 


		
	2)
	Impacts of a divestiture with revenue equal to or greater than $100 million;


		
	3)
	Effects of a change in accounting principle as identified within the Company’s consolidated financial statements or MD&A.




1
EXHIBIT 99.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Donald Boggus, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ J. DONALD BOGGUS, JR.            
|J. Donald Boggus, Jr.                
|President and Chief Executive Officer



April 15, 2003



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leland W. Brantley, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ LELAND W. BRANTLEY, JR.
|Leland W. Brantley, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer    



April 15, 2003
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1081 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 

charitable contributions as an above-the-line deduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2021 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

deduction for charitable contributions as an above-theline deduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Charitable Giving Tax 

5 Deduction Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1081 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS AL2 LOWED IN DETERMINING ADJUSTED GROSS 

3 INCOME. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 62(a) of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after para6 graph (7) the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(8) CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS.—The de8 duction allowed under section 170.’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

10 170(b)(1)(H) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘(com11 puted without regard to any net operating loss carryback 

12 to the taxable year under section 172).’’ and inserting the 

13 following: ‘‘computed without regard to— 

14 ‘‘(i) section 62(a)(8), and 

15 ‘‘(ii) any net operating loss carryback 

16 to the taxable year under section 172.’’. 

17 (c) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROVISIONS.—Section 

18 212 of the Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief 

19 Act of 2020 (other than subsection (c) thereof) is repealed 

20 and each provision of law amended by such section (other 

21 than such subsection) is amended to read as such provi22 sion would read if such section had never been enacted. 

23 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

25 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2024-1590

LT Case No. 2010-CF-8349

_____________________________ 

CHARLES E. BOWERS, 

Petitioner, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondent. 

_____________________________ 

Petition for Belated Appeal. 

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Ryan Edward McFarland, of Kent & McFarland, Jacksonville, 

for Petitioner. 

Ashely Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ryan Roy,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. 

August 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this 

opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the 

notice of appeal from the January 8, 2021 order denying 

defendant’s motion for postconviction relief rendered in Case No.

2010-CF-8349, in the Circuit Court in and for Duval County, 

Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 
2

PETITION GRANTED.

JAY, HARRIS, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.

____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Cedric BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4295

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 10.7.2**

 

 

**Employment Arrangements with Mark D. Slusser**

 

America’sCar-Mart, Inc. (the “Company”) does not have a written employment agreementwith Mark D. Slusser.  Mr. Slusserreceives an annual salary of $255,000 per year and a quarterly bonus equal to0.5% of the Company’s net income during such period.  In addition, Mr. Slusser is entitled to thefollowing fringe benefits:  use of acompany car, cell phone service, long-term disability insurance, healthinsurance for him and his family and payment of health or country club dues,which dues were approximately $500 in fiscal 2005.  The Company did not make any payments forlong-term disability insurance for Mr. Slusser during fiscal 2005.  Mr. Slusser’s salary, bonus and fringebenefits are subject to adjustment at the discretion of the Company’s board ofdirectors and price increases.

 

----
### NUM BER 13-0 8-00 580- CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ JOYC E M A RIE SM ITH , A pp ellan t, v . TH E STA

TE OF T EXAS, A pp ellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On ap pe al f rom th e 3 77t h Dist rict C ou rt o f V icto ria C ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ 

## MEM ORA N D U M OPINION Be fo re C hie f J us tice Vald ez an d Ju stice s Yañ ez an d Be na v ide s

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, Joyce Ma rie Sm it h, by and throug h her

att or ney , hasfil ed a moti on to d ism iss her app eal bec ause she no l ong er des ires to prosec ute i t. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 2(a). W ithou t pas s in g o n t h e m erits of the case , we grant the mot ion to dismiss pursuantto Tex as Rule o f Appell ate P ro cedure 42. 2( a)and dis mis s t he appe al. H av ing dis mis sed the a ppeal at appel lan t' s requ e st, no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned,2

and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h. PERC UR IAM
Do not p ubl is h. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 7.2( b)
. Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s 2 8th d ay

of Aug ust , 200 9.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Reg. Nos. 333-81709, 333-95355, 333-38434, 333-47454)
and Form S-3 (Reg. Nos. 333-41540, 333-48360) of Digital Island, Inc. of our
report dated November 10, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated November 10, 2000 relating to the financial statement
schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
January 26, 2001
Gary M. SHRIGLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0561

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jacques Antwon CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6368

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

Jacques Antwon Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina; Kimberly Furr Davis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jacques Antwon Campbell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a' certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Campbell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A167