alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wayne D. COOPER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden STEVENSON, Broad River Corr. Inst., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-6529

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 22, 2016

Wayne D. Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Alphonso Simon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wayne D. Cooper seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent *“a*substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies re*809lief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the- constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cooper has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this’ court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 10-K and into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statement File No. 33-12034 and 33-31547, of our report dated January 5, 1996,
included in Argonaut Group, Inc.'s 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders. It should
be noted that we have not audited any consolidated financial statements of the
Company subsequent to December 31, 1995 or performed any audit procedures
subsequent to the date of our report.



                                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



San Francisco, California
 February 27, 1996
PLAZA EAST ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. Gerald E. MARCIAL, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3567

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED BASIS:
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                           For the three months ended        For the six months ended
                                                   June 30,                        June 30,
                                            1997            1996              1997          1996
                                           --------------------------        ------------------------
<S>                                         <C>             <C>               <C>           <C>  
Net income                                   $140,713        $136,928          $318,511      $330,994

Weighted average shares outstanding           705,068         704,854           704,962       704,854

Earnings per share                              $0.20           $0.19             $0.45         $0.47
</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1531 

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require assurances that 

certain family planning service projects and programs will provide pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2021 

Mr. WITTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require 

assurances that certain family planning service projects 

and programs will provide pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adoption Information 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1531 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION IN FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OF 

2 PAMPHLETS CONTAINING ADOPTION CENTER 

3 CONTACT INFORMATION. 

4 Title V of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 701 

5 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 514. LIMITATION. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro8 vision of this title, a grant may be made or contract en9 tered into under section 501 for a family planning service 

10 project or program only upon assurances satisfactory to 

11 the Secretary that the project or program will— 

12 ‘‘(1) provide to each person to whom the med13 ical professional provides family planning medical 

14 services, at the time the person inquires about med15 ical or abortion services, a pamphlet that contains— 

16 ‘‘(A) a comprehensive list of the adoption 

17 centers located in the region (as determined by 

18 the Secretary) where the adoption services are 

19 provided; and 

20 ‘‘(B) the address and telephone number of 

21 each such center; and 

22 ‘‘(2) provide each such person an opportunity to 

23 read the pamphlet. 

24 ‘‘(b) PAMPHLETS.—The Secretary shall prepare, an25 nually update, and distribute to each project or program 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1531 IH

1 referred to in subsection (a) pamphlets described in such 

2 subsection. 

3 ‘‘(c) NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS.—No funds may be 

4 used to carry out this section, except funds that are appro5 priated to carry out this title.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 24





Consent
of David Grafton Ritchie



I
consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical
report “NI 43-101 Technical Report Feasibility Study of the Rainy River Project, Ontario, Canada”, dated February
14, 2014, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2014, and I consent
to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold
Inc.



Dated
this 27th day of March, 2015





|/s/ David G. Ritchie |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:                | David G. Ritchie, M.Eng., P.Eng.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|Title:               | Geotechnical Engineering Group Manager
                                                                                Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer
                                                                                Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure,
                                                                                a Division of Amec Foster Wheeler Americas Limited
Christopher Edward CURTIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0098

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.30


Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements


In addition to the compensation arrangements filed as other exhibits to this annual report, EnPro Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) has the following compensation arrangements with its directors and current executive officers who are named executive officers.


Compensation Arrangements for Directors


The Company has an arrangement to pay non-employee members of the Company’s board of directors compensation for their service on the board.  Effective for 2018, each non-employee member of the Company’s board of directors receives an annual retainer of $175,000, $80,000 of which is paid in cash and $95,000 of which is paid in phantom shares of our common stock upon the director’s termination of service as a director.  The non-executive chairman of the board receives an additional quarterly fee of $15,000 for his service in that capacity and for his service as chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the chairman of the Audit and Risk Management Committee receives an additional annual fee of $20,000, and the chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee receives an annual fee of $15,000.  


Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers


The Company’s chief executive officer and its other most highly compensated current executive officers who are named executive officers in the Company's proxy statement for its 2019 annual meeting of shareholders are all “at-will” employees who serve at the pleasure of the board of directors.  The board of directors sets the annual base salary for each of the named executive officers and has the discretion to change the salary of any of the officers at any time.  Effective for 2019, the annual base salaries for these named executive officers are as follows:
	
		
	Named Executive Officer
	Base Salary

	Stephen E. Macadam
	$887,452

	Marvin A. Riley
	$475,000

	J. Milton Childress II
	$452,000

	Robert S. McLean
	$400,000

	William C. O'Neal
	$297,000
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors

Endavo Media and Communications, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Endavo Media and Communications, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-119586) filed on
October 7, 2004 of our report dated April 9, 2005, on the consolidated balance
sheets of Endavo Media and Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
appears in Endavo Media and Communications, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


/s/  Hein & Associates LLP
-----------------------------
     Hein & Associates LLP


Phoenix, Arizona

April 9, 2005
SENIOR HOME CARE, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Donna ISABELL, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0300

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
Oleta C. WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-390

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 160A/27 m

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 160A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 5727 maja 2014 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 160A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 5727 maja 2014

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ogłoszenia |
| | POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE |
| | Europejska Agencja Leków |
| 2014/C 160A/01 | Zawiadomienie o anulowaniu procedury rekrutacyjnej | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

V   Ogłoszenia

POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE

Europejska Agencja Leków

2014/C 160A/01

Zawiadomienie o anulowaniu procedury rekrutacyjnej

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 160A/02 | Przegląd dzienników urzędowych serii C A — Konkursy | 2 |

2014/C 160A/02

Przegląd dzienników urzędowych serii C A — Konkursy

2

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

V Ogłoszenia

POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE

Europejska Agencja Leków

| 27.5.2014 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 160/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2014

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 160/1

---

Zawiadomienie o anulowaniu procedury rekrutacyjnej

2014/C 160 A/01

Europejska Agencja Leków zadecydowała o anulowaniu poniższej procedury rekrutacyjnej:

| — | EMA/AD/359: Kierownik Departamentu Operacji Informatycznych, Dział Technologii Informacyjnych (AD 10). |
| --- | --- |

—

EMA/AD/359: Kierownik Departamentu Operacji Informatycznych, Dział Technologii Informacyjnych (AD 10).

---

27.5.2014

| 27.5.2014 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 160/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 160/2

---

PRZEGLĄD DZIENNIKÓW URZĘDOWYCH SERII C A — KONKURSY

2014/C 160 A/02

Poniżej znajduje się lista Dzienników Urzędowych serii C A opublikowanych w tym roku.

O ile nie wskazano inaczej, Dzienniki Urzędowe opublikowane zostały we wszystkich wersjach językowych.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

---
addendumemplyredpath.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    Addendum

    to
the

    Employment
Agreement

    between

    CS
Financing Corporation

    and

    Timothy
Redpath

    dated:
January 16, 2008

    


    


    


    The
Company and Executive agree that commencing with any payments of compensation
hereunder that become due in calendar year 2009 after March 1, 2009, Executive
hereby waives any and all of his rights to such compensation, and such
compensation shall not be paid by the Company, except that Executive shall be
entitled to receive One United States Dollar ($1.00) from the Company during the
remainder of calendar year 2009.  In addition, Executive hereby waives
any and all of his rights to any compensation for calendar year 2009 that was
deferred, and such deferred compensation shall not be paid by the
Company.

    


    The
parties have duly executed this Addendum on March 28, 2009.

    


    CS
Financing Corporation

    


    By:
__/s/ Michael
Bozora______

    Michael Bozora,
President 

    


    


    Timothy
Redpath

    


    ___/s/ Timothy
Redpath________
Francis BAHR, DOC #C09990, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3104

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Joseph PIRELA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of FLORIDA, Discrimination in Cases with No evidence and State of Florida False Sentences; Denis Fonseca, Miami Police officer; Angel Miranda, Miami Police officer; David Countin, Miami Police officer; Don Smith, Miami Police officer; John Edwards, Miami Police officer; City of Miami; Thomas Williams; Ileana Ros-Lehtinen; Carlos Alvarez; Aloyma Sanchez; Mercedes Aleman; Ethiel Calderon; Olaida Villalobos; Irvvin Gonzalez; Bernando Roman; all Defendants in Case No. 16-cv-24631; Miami Department of Children and Families; Jackson Hospital; Attorney General, Miami Florida, Defendants-Appellees.

*232No. 17-1781

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Decided: October 23, 2017

Joseph Pirela, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Pirela appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), Pirela’s civil complaint against Defendants. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Pirela’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition and, thus, Pirela has forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order. *See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).

In addition, Pirela’s complaint was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012), thereby requiring Pirela to file timely specific objections to the recommendation in order to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation. *See Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). Pirela was warned of the consequences of his failure to timely file specific objections. Although Pirela filed objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, rather than challenge the magistrate judge’s dispositive reasons for recommending dismissal of his claims, Pirela’s objections merely restated the allegations underlying his claims. Thus, we also conclude that Pirela has waived appellate review of the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

For these reasons, we affirm the district court’s judgment. *See Pirela v. Florida,*No. 5:17-cv-00160-D, 2017 WL 2438791 (E.D.N.C. June 5, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.18


PLURALSIGHT, INC.




August 2, 2018


Bonita Stewart 


Dear Bonita,


On behalf of Pluralsight, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), I am pleased to invite you to join the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), subject to your election to the Board (the date of such election being the “Effective Date”), which we anticipate will be October 30, 2018. You will serve as a director from the Effective Date until the date upon which you are not re-elected or your earlier removal or resignation.
In consideration for your service on the Board and subject to approval by the Board, you will be eligible to receive the following compensation:
		
	•
	10,000 Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) covering your period of service through May 2019. This grant may be pro-rated based on the actual Effective Date of your start with the Board.


		
	•
	Annual RSU award with a grant date fair value of USD $186,000.00 effective the day of the 2019 annual meeting, expected in May 2019.


		
	•
	USD $30,000.00 annually and beginning the day of the 2019 Annual Shareholder Meeting, expected in May 2019.


		
	•
	Additional annual cash payments depending on Committee service, beginning the day of the 2019 Annual Shareholder Meeting, expected in May 2019.


The Company will reimburse you for all reasonable travel expenses that you incur in connection with your attendance at meetings of the Board, in accordance with the Company’s expense reimbursement policy as in effect from time to time. In addition, you will receive indemnification as a director of the Company to the maximum extent extended to directors of the Company generally, as set forth in the Company’s certificate of incorporation, bylaws, an indemnification agreement between the Company and you (which will be provided to you upon the Effective Date) and any director and officer insurance the Company may have and maintain from time to time.
In accepting this offer, you are representing to us that (i) you do not know of any conflict which would restrict your service on the Board and (ii) you will not provide the Company with any documents, records, or other confidential information belonging to other parties.
This letter sets forth the entire compensation you will receive for your service on the Board. Nothing in this letter should be construed as an offer of employment. If the foregoing terms are agreeable, please indicate your acceptance by signing the letter in the space provided below.
Kind Regards,


/s/ Aaron Skonnard


Aaron Skonnard
Chief Executive Officer




Accepted and agreed:


/s/ Bonita C. Stewart
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 60028 Summary Calendar

JOSE GUADALUPE VASQUEZ ALVARADO ,
Petitioner

v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A200 938 977

Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM: * Jose Guadalupe Vasquez Alvarado, his wife, and his three children, all
native s and citizen s of Mexico, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision dismissing their application s for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT ) , ba sed on
threats that Vasquez received during a property dispute. They do not challenge dismissal of the asylum or withholding

- of

- removal claims ; therefore,

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 30, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-60028 Document: 00512920980 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/30/2015N o. 14

- 60028

these claims are waived. E.g., Zhu v. Gonzales , 493 F.3d 588, 593 n.10 (5th Cir. 2007)

. Review of factual finding s underlying the conclusion that an alien is not eligible for relief under CAT is conducted pursuant to the substantial

- evidence
standard. Chen v. Gonzales , 470 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 2006) (citations omitted)

. Under that standard, we may not reverse unless “ the evidence

suppo rts a contrary conclusion . . . [and] compels it”

. Id. (emphasis in original) ( citation and internal quotation marks omitted ).
P etitioners assert : t he y are likely to be tortured if t he y return to Mexico ; and the Mexican government will disregard such torture. T he evidence , however , shows : criminals extorted Vasquez once ; and , although these
criminals do not possess the deed they demanded from Vasquez , they control
the land to which the deed applies

. The conclusory assertion that Vasquez or his family will be tortured if t he y return to Mexico and that such torture will be with the consent or acquiescence of the Mexican government is insufficient to compel a conclusion different from that reached by the BI A.
DENIED.

2 Case: 14-60028 Document: 00512920980 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/30/2015