alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 25, 2010 

s0517 

Order 

 

May 25, 2010 

140513 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140513 

 COA: 283364 

Oakland CC: 2007-216890-FC 

VON CEDRIC LARRY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 15, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 07

- 16

- 00372

- CR

Isaac J. Adams Appellant

v.

The State of Texas Appellee §

§

§

§ From the 432nd District Court of Tarrant County

November 30, 2017

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 30, 2017

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgme nt of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis , no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O oNo. 07

- 16

- 0037 3

- CR

Isaac J. Adams Appellant

v.

The State of Texas Appellee §

§

§

§ From the 432nd District Court of Tarrant County

November 30, 2017

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 30, 2017

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgme nt of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis , no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O oNo. 07

- 16

- 0037 4

- CR

Isaac J. Adams Appellant

v.

The State of Texas Appellee §

§

§

§ From the 432nd District Court of Tarrant County

November 30, 2017

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 30, 2017

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgme nt of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis , no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2011 of America’s Car-Mart, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, William H. Henderson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffrey A. Williams, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify in our capacities as officers of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:           \s\ William H. Henderson


William H. Henderson


President and Chief Executive Officer


June 17, 2011








By:           \s\ Jeffrey A. Williams


Jeffrey A. Williams


Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


June 17, 2011
Juan MATAMOROS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
IC for Serviced Schools - Perkins

The respondents are 1,854 Serviced Schools - Perkins. There are 22,248 responses per ye ar. Total burden hours for this respondent ty pe are 88,992. There is no specific instrument that relates specifically to this grou

p of respondents since all respondents use the same NSLDS s ys tem.
Broderick A. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1261

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### Thomas Garcia SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. EMRAN, Medical Doctor/Correct Care Solutions, Defendant-Appellee, and C. T. Woody, Sheriff of Richmond, VA; Correct Care Solutions, Medical Company, Defendants.

No. 17-1512

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Decided: October 23, 2017

Thomas Garcia Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Griggs, Katherine Curie Skilling, WIMBISH GENTILE MCCRAY & ROE-BER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Garcia Singleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea*228sons stated by the district court. *Singleton v. Emran,*No. 3:15-cv-00200-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1165 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1165

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the statue to the 
memory and in honor of Albert Pike erected near Judiciary Square in the 
             District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

    Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Rush, and Ms. Clarke of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the statue to the 
memory and in honor of Albert Pike erected near Judiciary Square in the 
             District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Albert Pike Statue Removal Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF STATUE OF ALBERT PIKE.

    (a) Removal.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
Director of the National Park Service, shall remove the statue to the 
memory and in honor of Albert Pike erected near Judiciary Square in the 
District of Columbia under the ``Joint Resolution Granting permission 
for the erection of a monument or statue in Washington City, District 
of Columbia, in honor of the late Albert Pike.'', approved April 9, 
1898 (30 Stat. 737).
    (b) Relocation.--The Secretary of the Interior may donate the 
statue to a museum or other similar entity, as determined appropriate 
by the Secretary, to ensure its preservation and interpretation in an 
indoor setting. The recipient of the statue may not store, display, or 
exhibit the statue outside.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Valassis Communications, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge and
belief that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 6, 2009 |  | /s/ Robert L. Recchia  
|                        |  | Robert L. Recchia      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41243 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALEJANDRO SANTAMARIA-BORJAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-218-1

-------------------- June 14, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro Santamaria-Borjas has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Santamaria filed a response asking that his appeal be dismissed because he cannot afford to pursue it, although he is represented by court-appointed counsel in this appeal. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from furtherNo. 99-41243 -2- responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 15






Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549


Dear Sirs:


We are aware that Acme Metals Incorporated has incorporated our report dated May
7, 1999 (issued pursuant to the provisions of Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 71) in the Prospectuses constituting part of its Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-17235, 33-19437 and 33-30841) and in its Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-38747 and 33-59627). We are also aware of our
responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.


Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Chicago, Illinois
May 7, 1999



                                       26
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**DANIEL JAMES DOMENICK Respondent**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 2243 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**Board File Nos. C4-14-374, C4-15-667, C4-15-846, C4-15-847, C4-15-906,**  **C4-15-985, C4-15-990, and C4-16-35 Attorney Registrati**  **on No. 312682 (Allegheny County)** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

**AND NOW, this 22 nd**  **day of February, 2016, upon consideration of the resp onses**  **to a Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary**  **suspension, the Rule is made absolute and it is provided that:**  **1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until f urther definitive action**  **by this Court; 2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.**  **R.D.E. 217; 3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas**  **of Allegheny County shall enter such orders as may be necessary to fully protect**  **the rights of Respondent’s clients or fiduciary entities with which he is involved,**  **see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g);**  **4. All financial institutions in which Respondent hold s fiduciary funds shall freeze**  **such accounts pending further action; 5. Respondent shall confirm that he has provided the**  **Office of Disciplinary**

**Counsel with a list of the names and addresses of all cli ents and other entities he is** **currently representing or with respect to which he is a f iduciary, as well as the banks** 

**and account number in which the funds are currently main tained. Respondent shall**  **further confirm that he has ceased accepting fee payme nts from clients who reside in**  **jurisdictions where Respondent is not permitted to practi ce law.**  **Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amen dment of this order**  **pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(6), and to request acceler ated disposition of charges**  **underlying this order pursuant to 208(f)(6), are specif ically preserved.**  **This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to**  **confidentiality. See**  **Pa.R.D.E. 402.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
OTBOC and Gloria Walker v. BRYANT BANK and Randy Rogers Properties, LLC

2160249

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### Edmond WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter CRUM, M.D.*; Carol Rodgers, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-1375

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed February 7, 2017

Edmond Walker, Pro Se

Elizabeth Craigmile Moran, Nixon Shef-rin Hensen Ogburn, Greenwood Village, CO, Patrick Andrew Singer, Kresl & Johnson, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellee

Before HARTZ, HOLMES, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.

*

The district-court caption spells the doctor’s last name as "Crumb.” But his brief on appeal consistently spells the name without a "b.” We have corrected the caption here.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT **

Harris L Hartz Circuit Judge

Plaintiff Edmond Walker sued Dr. Peter Crum under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a violation of the Eighth Amendment while he was a pretrial detainee in the Denver County Jail. His claim is that after he suffered a hip injury, he was subjected to unnecessary pain because of Dr. Crum’s deliberate indifference in providing him medical care. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994).

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado granted summary judgment to Dr. Crum. The court’s opinion thoroughly reviews the facts and the law. We see nothing to add. On appeal, Plaintiff does not point to any factual errors in that opinion and his “legal” argument is too brief and conclusory to be helpful.

We AFFIRM the judgment below. Mr. Walker’s motion to proceed *in forma pau-peris*is DENIED.

**

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
David Earl GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 93 

Expressing support for the designation of March 2, 2019, as ‘‘Gold Star 

Families Remembrance Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. JONES, Mr. MANCHIN, and Ms. MCSALLY) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of March 2, 2019, 

as ‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Day’’. 

Whereas March 2, 2019, marks the 90th anniversary of 

President Calvin Coolidge signing an Act of Congress 

that approved and funded the first Gold Star pilgrimage 

to enable Gold Star mothers and widows to travel to the 

gravesites of their loved ones who died during World War 

I; 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces bear 

the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the 

United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 93 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of March 2, 2019, 

3 as ‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Day’’; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made 

5 by the families of veterans and members of the 

6 Armed Forces who gave their lives to defend free7 dom and protect the United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe Gold Star Families Remembrance Day— 

10 (A) by performing acts of service and good 

11 will in their communities; and 

12 (B) by celebrating the lives of those who 

13 have made the ultimate sacrifice so that others 

14 could continue to enjoy life, liberty, and the 

15 pursuit of happiness. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Randall  H.  Pierce,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of Lone Star
Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 15,  2004 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                     /s/ Randall H. Pierce
                                     ---------------------
                                     Randall H. Pierce
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     July 26, 2004
```
JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI

GOVERNOR October 26, 2010

David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch U .S. EPA Region I-NE 5 Post Office Square Mail Code: OEP 05-2 Boston, Ma. 02109-3912 Dear Mr. Conroy: Enclosed please find for your approval and inclusion into Maine's State Implementation Plan (SIP), Chapter 161 Graphic Arts - Lithography and Letterpress Printing. BETH NAGUSKY ACTINGCOMMISSIONER

Apublic hearing was held on August 6, 2009 in accordance with federal and state administrative requirements. Public notice of thehearing was published in the Kennebec Journal on July 6, 2009 and in newspapers statewide on July 15, 2009. On March 18, 2010, the Board of Environmental Protection adopted Chapter 161 . The following administrative materials are enclosed: 1 . Memorandumto the Board of Environmental Protection requesting a public hearing dated June 18, 2009; 2 . Copy ofthe public notice that appeared in the Kennebec Journal on July 6, 2009; 3. Memorandum

to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting adoption of the rule, dated March 16, 2010

; 4 . Chapter 161 Graphic Arts - Lithography and Letterpress Printing as adopted by the Board of Environmental Protection on March 16, 2010with an effective date ofApril 6, 2010 ;

AUGUSTA 17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD, SUITE 6 312 CANCOROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK (207) 287-7688 FAX

: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04679-2094 RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 941-4570 FAX : (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX : (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX : (207) 760-3143 STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

web site: www

.maine .gov/dep

### Letter to

(date) Page 2 of 2

5 . Summary of comments and the Department's response; 6 . MAPA I formfor Chapter 161 which provides certification by the Commissioner that the hearing was held on August 6, 2009, the Board of Environmental Protection lawfully adopted this rule on April 6, 2010 and certification that the Attorney General approved the rule as to formand legality; and 7. The August 6, 2009 public hearing transcript . Should you have any questions, please contact DebAvalone-King at (207) 287-2437. Sincerely,

ames P. Brooks Director Bureau ofAir Quality Enclosures cc: Anne Arnold Ariel Garcia Deb Avalone-King w/o encl SIPfile
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricky Lee HOLLOWAY, a/k/a Eight, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6395

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 17, 2017

Decided: August 21, 2017

Ricky Lee Holloway, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appel-lee.

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

*111Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Lee Holloway appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Holloway,*No. 8:13-er-00525-RWT-2 (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*