alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,953,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,380,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,770,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   105,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,098,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,602,000
<PP&E>                                      30,168,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,893,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,108,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,825,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       111,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,569,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,108,000
<SALES>                                      6,364,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,364,000
<CGS>                                        4,337,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,337,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,730,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (563,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (563,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (563,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
# IllinOiSPIRG 328 s.



# J•"·~·· st. st•. s2o 

## 1chicago, ll60661 

# Education Fund ----------- ww

-\'-

,.il-

lin

.....; oi-

sp

- irg

- .o

-rg

_.__ (3

- 1-

2) ..:.. s4

...;. 4

_ ·4-

43

- 3 -

(p-

h) info@illinoispirg.org (312) 559·6092 (fx) 

### Testimony of Korbin Houston, Intern Illinois Public Research Interest Group (Illinois PIRG) In Support of Stronger Heavy-Duty Vehicle Emission Standards Hello EPA Hearing Committee, my name is Korbin Houston and I am an intern with the Illinois Public Inter est Research Group (Illinois PIRG}.Thank you for the opportunity to testify in support of stronger emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles. Strong emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles, like trucks, will save consumers money. According to the National Resource Defense Council and its partner organizations who have researched these standards, consumers will save more by the decrease in the use of oil and the use of efficiency technology
. Further, consumers support decreasing emissions. A Consumer Federation ofAmerica poll released in May 2015 found that a large majority ofAmericans favor requiring manufacturers to increase the fuel efficiency of heavy-duty trucks (71 percent) while less than one quarter oppose such a requirement (24 percent)
. Consumers' voices should be considered with these standards. These standards are also important for public health. The reduction oftoxic air pollution by the proposed rule would result in $37 billion in health and welfare benefits, including reductions in mortality and hospitalizations
. Finally, these standards are important to me personally. I want these standards because I want to help the momentum of making America a greener and healthier place to live, for myself and the other citizens in this country. And it is beyond America, as global climate change affects the environment, the health of people of this planet, and the ecosystems that are going. Having these emissions standards, and making them strong and effective emission standards, is one part of the many actions that must be taken in order to have a healthier planet to live on. These standards are also important as me being a millennia!. Young people now, and in the future have to do deal with the consequence of action or inaction when it comes to climate change. In conclusion, stronger emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles will save consumers money, improve public health , and help fight global climate change. Thank you again for the opportunity to testify today. Korbin Houston ko rbin@illinoispirg . org
Curtis BROWN, Petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0084

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

Curtis Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee; Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*899The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Ray, Bilbrey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 8 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide 

for balanced budgets for the Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself and Mr. GALLAGHER) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to provide for balanced budgets for the Government. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 8 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall 

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless two4 thirds of the whole number of each House of Congress 

5 shall provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over 

6 receipts by a rollcall vote. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President 

8 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the 

9 United States Government for that fiscal year in which 

10 total outlays do not exceed total receipts. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress may waive the provisions 

12 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

13 of war is in effect by a rollcall vote. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 4. The Congress may waive the provisions 

15 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

16 of national emergency is in effect, as so declared by a joint 

17 resolution, adopted by a majority of the whole number of 

18 each House, which becomes law. 

19 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may waive the provisions 

20 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

21 of a natural disaster is in effect, as so declared by a joint 

22 resolution, adopted by a majority of the whole number of 

23 each House, which becomes law. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 8 IH 

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple2 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely 

3 on estimates of outlays and receipts. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 7. This article shall take effect beginning 

5 with the fifth fiscal year beginning after its ratification.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Wayne COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-30125 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

FILED September 27, 2017

Carol Mignonne Griffing, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for. Plaintiff-Appellee.

Douglas Lee Harville,. Harville Law Firm, L.L.C., Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Daniel Wayne Collins pleaded guilty to one charge of conspiring to distribute *172methamphetamine and one charge of possession of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense. He was sentenced to serve 168 months in prison on the former charge, to run consecutively to a 60-month sentence on the latter charge, as well as five years on supervised release. The district court denied both his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce sentence and the ensuing motion for reconsideration.

Collins’s notice of appeal is, as the Government asserts, untimely as to the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence because it was not filed within 14 days of the court’s order denying the motion. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i); *United States v. Alvarez,*210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (explaining that § 3582 is a criminal provision and the time limit for filing a notice of appeal in a criminal case is jurisdictional). However, the notice of appeal was timely filed with respect to the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration. Nonetheless, because Collins’s motion for reconsideration was filed more than 14 days following the district court’s ruling on his § 3582(c)(2) motion, it was an unauthorized motion that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain. *See United States v. Cook,*670 F.2d 46, 48 (5th Cir. 1982). *See also United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994); *United States v. Miramontez,*995 F.2d 56, 58 n.2 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *172published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.
#                         Rear Admiral Michael L. Baker                    

#### Senior Defense Official/Defense Attaché - India

 Download                            

 Download                                        

Senior Defense Official/Defense Attaché - India

## Rear Admiral Michael L. Baker

----

-  **                                            Share                                         
-  **                                            PRINT                                         
-  **                                            RSS                                         

Rear Adm. Baker is a native of Charlotte, North Carolina. He is a 1995 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy with a Bachelor of Science in History, and a 2005 graduate of Istanbul Bilgi University as an Olmsted Scholar with a Master of Arts in International Relations. He served as a 2010 International Affairs Fellow to the Council on Foreign Relations, and speaks Turkish and French.

Baker is a Navy foreign area officer with experience building partner capability & capacity, enabling U.S. Coalition operations, leading Military Attaché Operations, and directing international strategy and plans in the Africa Command, European Command, Indo-Pacific Command, and Central Command areas of responsibility.

As an E-2C Hawkeye naval flight officer, he deployed to the Western Pacific and Indian Ocean and to the Arabian Gulf and Saudi Arabia in support of Operation Southern Watch. As a foreign area officer, he deployed to Silopi, Turkey and Northern Iraq serving as liaison officer to the Turkish Special Forces in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom; and on board High Speed Vessel Swift in the Indian Ocean to support U.S. Naval Forces Africa’s Africa Partnership Station.

Shore, assignments include: Naval Strike and Air Warfare Center, Weapons & Tactics instructor; Office the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV N52), Asia Pacific political-military planner; U.S. Africa Command, director of West Africa Engagement; Senior Defense Official/Defense Attaché to Madagascar, Comoros, Mauritius, and Seychelles; Office of Defense Cooperation Turkey, Chief of Naval Cooperation; Defense Intelligence Agency, director, Defense Attaché Service – Asia Pacific Division; Bahrain, assistant Chief of Staff for Strategy, Plans, and Policy (N5) for U.S. Naval Forces Central/U.S. 5th Fleet; OPNAV N51 Security Cooperation & Posture, and Foreign Area Officer Community Chief of Staff

Baker is the Navy foreign area officer community leader.

*Last Updated: 8 July 2022*

----

-  **                                Share                             
-  **                                PRINT                             
-  **                                RSS
EX-10.39






Exhibit 10.39




June 5,
2008




Xplor Capital Management LLC

Two Stamford Landing — Suite 100

68 Southfield Avenue

Stamford, CT 06902




Attention: Mr. Damon Hart



Re: Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Mr. Hart:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools
to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the
Management Agreements through June 30, 2009 and all other provisions of the Management
Agreements will remain unchanged.





	 	•	 	CTA Capital LLC
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Emerging CTA Portfolio LP




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and
returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax 212-793-1986.
If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



Very truly yours,




	 	 	 	 	 
	CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	/s/
Jennifer Magro 	 	 
	 

	 	 

Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	XPLOR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By: 
	 	 /s/ D. Hart	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Print
Name: D. Hart
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	JM/sr
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1318 

To restrict the imposition by the Secretary of Homeland Security of fines, 

penalties, duties, or tariffs applicable only to coastwise voyages, or prohibit otherwise qualified non-United States citizens from serving as crew, 

on specified vessels transporting passengers between the State of Washington and the State of Alaska, to address a Canadian cruise ship 

ban and the extraordinary impacts of the COVID–19 pandemic on Alaskan communities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2021 

Mr. YOUNG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To restrict the imposition by the Secretary of Homeland 

Security of fines, penalties, duties, or tariffs applicable 

only to coastwise voyages, or prohibit otherwise qualified 

non-United States citizens from serving as crew, on specified vessels transporting passengers between the State 

of Washington and the State of Alaska, to address a 

Canadian cruise ship ban and the extraordinary impacts 

of the COVID–19 pandemic on Alaskan communities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1318 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Tourism Recov3 ery Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. VOYAGE DEEMED TO BE FOREIGN. 

5 (a) CRITERIA.—A roundtrip voyage transporting pas6 sengers between a port or place in the State of Alaska 

7 and a port or place in the State of Washington is deemed 

8 a foreign voyage for purposes of U.S. law, if the voyage— 

9 (1) is made by a passenger vessel to which sec10 tions 3507 and 3508 of title 46, United States Code, 

11 apply; and 

12 (2) which occurs during the period described in 

13 subsection (b). 

14 (b) DURATION OF APPLICABILITY.—A voyage 

15 deemed to be a foreign voyage under subsection (a) is a 

16 voyage which begins not later than any date prior to Feb17 ruary 28, 2022, on which the Government of Canada or 

18 its political subdivisions, or any port or province in Can19 ada, prohibits a passenger vessel to which sections 3507 

20 and 3508 of title 46, United States Code, apply from en21 tering, berthing, or docking in Canadian waters of the Pa22 cific Coast due to the COVID–19 pandemic. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Michael Antonio ALLEN, DOC #T16519, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D16-1532 2D16-2288 CONSOLIDATED

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kerene DAWES, Appellant, v. Throy DAWES, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Darlene FREEMAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jerry Freeman, deceased, and Darlene Freeman, individually, Appellant, v. Edgar D. RAMIREZ-PAGAN, M.D., and Florida Medical Clinic, P.A., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-2746

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Stephen HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-344

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Katherine COX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-58

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        FIRST USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                       THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER, 1996

                  (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>      
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended September 30,
                                                   --------------------------------
                                                          1996          1995
                                                      -----------    -----------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C> 
Primary                                                
-------
Net income                                            $    64,056    $    47,804
                                                      ===========    ===========
Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding
      Average common shares outstanding               121,478,312    117,894,384
      Common stock equivalents:
         Stock options                                  4,462,372      5,271,952
         Mandatory convertible preferred stock          9,582,950      9,582,950
                                                      -----------    -----------
      Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares                            135,523,634    132,749,286
                                                      ===========    ===========
                                                                               
Net income per share                                  $      0.47    $      0.36
                                                      ===========    ===========

Fully diluted                                              
-------------
Net income                                            $    64,056    $    47,804
                                                      ===========    ===========
Weighted average common and common
   equivalent shares outstanding
      Average common shares outstanding               121,478,312    117,894,384
      Common stock equivalents:
         Stock options                                  4,772,636      5,834,512
         Mandatory convertible preferred stock          9,582,950      9,582,950
                                                      -----------    -----------
      Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares                            135,833,898    133,311,846
                                                      ===========    ===========
                                                           
Net income per share assuming full dilution           $      0.47    $      0.36
                                                      ===========    ===========

</TABLE>
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-702 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 7/24/2013 Sample Number: 132915-001 Date Collected:07/16/2013 Date Received:7/17/2013 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 226 0.50 DPC EPA 200.8 0.20 07/23/2013 12:25 

### Sample Number: 132915-002 Date Collected: 07/16/2013 Date Received:7/17/2013 

### 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 15.0 0.50 DPC EPA 200.8 0.20 07/23/2013 13:17 

### Sample Number: 132915-003 Date Collected:07/16/2013 Date Received:7/17/2013 

## Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 2.4 0.50 DPC EPA 200.8 0.20 07/23/2013 13:22

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 132915 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Stater Bros. Holdings
Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 26,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. Date: May 6, 2005 /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman, President, andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)May 6, 2005/s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithSenior Vice President, andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 6, 2005