alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 16-BG-468

IN RE WILLIAM P. CORBETT, JR.

2013 DDN 161

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg. No. 445800

BEFORE: Thompson, Associate Judge, and Farrell and Reid, Senior Judges.

O R D E R

(Filed – October 19, 2017)

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Judicial Court for 

Suffolk County, Massachusetts, disbarring respondent from the practice of law in 

Massachusetts; this court’s July 21, 2017, order temporarily suspending respondent

and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be 

imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline;

and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the show cause order or 

the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that William P. Corbett, Jr., is hereby disbarred from the practice 

of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 

2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in D.C. Bar R. XI, § 

11 (c) will prevail except in “rare” cases); In re Cole, 809 A.2d 1226, 1227 n.3 (D.C. 

2002) (explaining that in unopposed reciprocal matters the “imposition of identical 

discipline should be close to automatic”). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the time for eligibility to petition for 

reinstatement will not begin to run until such time as respondent files a D.C. Bar R. 

XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending
December 31, 2007, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ Gregory P. Stemm                                              
|Gregory P. Stemm Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

March 13, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Exhibit No. 32.1
----------------
Form 10-KSB
Epicus Communications Group, Inc.
File No. 000-17058


            Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
               as adopted Pursuant to Section 906
               of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 -
    Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Accounting Officer


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epicus Communications
Group, Inc. (Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (Report), I, Mark Schaftlein, Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
       all material respects, the financial condition and result of
       operations of the Company.


Date: August 10, 2006                    By:       /s/ Mark Schaftlein
                                            --------------------------
                                                       Mark Schaftlein
                                           Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Acting Chief Financial Officer

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
  has been provided to Epicus Communications Group, Inc. and will be
  retained by Epicus Communications Group, Inc. and furnished to the
  Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 28,796.

#### The Montgomery County National Bank, *Appellee,*v. C. S. McGinness, *Appellant.*

(278 Pac. 741.)

Opinion filed July 6, 1929.

*J. A. Brady,*of Cherryvale, for the appellant.

*Sullivan Lomax,*of Cherryvale, for the appellee.

The opinion of.the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover on a promissory note signed by the defendant, made payable to himself, indorsed by him, and delivered to the plaintiff. The defendant answered and alleged that the note was void; that there was no consideration for it; that the original note, of which the note sued on was a renewal, had been procured from the defendant by fraudulent representations; that the original note had been executed under certain conditions; that those conditions were violated; and that the plaintiff, when it acquired the original note, knew there was no consideration for it and had knowledge of the conditions under which it had been given, and at the time the note sued on was given had knowledge of the violation of those conditions. The plaintiff filed a demurrer to the answer of the defendant; that demurrer was sustained. The defendant elected to stand on his answer. Judgment was then rendered for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals from the ruling on the demurrer and from the judgment rendered against him.

The only question is, Was the demurrer properly sustained? The answer alleged that there was no consideration for the note. The representations alleged by the defendant to have been fraudulent and the violation of the conditions under which the original note *554was given, if proved, would show there was no consideration for it. That want of consideration attached to the note sued on. Those allegations, with the allegation of the knowledge of the plaintiff, stated a sufficient defense. The demurrer to the answer should not have been sustained, and judgment should not have been rendered against the defendant.

The judgment is reversed, and the trial court is directed to overrule the demurrer.
FOIA Requested Record #J-12-0007 

Released by National Guard Bureau Page 1 of 1

FL 870 256 35 8 

GA 991 488 26 33 GU 0 18 0 1 

HI 817 313 13 9 

IA 860 286 31 19 

ID 585 242 8 33 IL 1061 398 23 8 

IN 284 856 5 43 

KS 711 530 15 19 

KY 662 230 19 19 

LA 861 236 20 4 

MA 735 343 29 16 

MD 463 359 28 18 ME 437 139 13 13 MI 1084 193 32 10 MN 1055 236 25 21 

MO 1099 386 25 26 MS 0 1684 0 57 MT 512 173 12 9 

NC 759 425 19 22 

ND 493 143 13 10 

NE 507 134 15 16 

NH 326 155 8 8 

NJ 773 195 25 17 

NM 394 90 10 15 NV 468 152 12 21 

NY 1573 503 54 21 

OH 1474 505 28 "24 OK 537 486 4 29 OR 871 366 20 14 

PA 1653 379 37 22 

PR 667 176 2 2 RI 19 437 1 21 

SC 1023 215 26 18 SO 463 131 12 7 

TN 1370 495 22 35 

TX 1472 638 37 51 

UT 481 405 24 17 

VA 305 570 1 35 VI 104 43 6 3 VT 406 209 14 12 

WA 641 262 13 16 WI 829 276 23 13 WV 766 223 14 12 WY 339 131 10 10 

1/19/2012 Page 1 

Posted to NGB FOIA Reading Room May 18, 2012
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 825

_____________________________
B RYAN K EITH W ADSWORTH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. Darlene F. Dickey , Judge

. September 13, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , C.J., and M AKAR and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for A ppellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00729-CV

In re Bobby Turner

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Filed: December 31, 2008
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Randall  H.  Pierce,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of Lone Star
Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 3, 2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Randall H. Pierce
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     Randall H. Pierce
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     October 18, 2002
```
Office of the Clerk

United States District Court

103 Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse

100 East Fifth Street

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

513/564-7520

January 10, 2006

All Counsel

RE: 1:01-cv-125 Goldman v Equitable Life Assurance

As you are aware, Judgment was entered in the above captioned case on

March 7, 2005. Therefore, should you choose to retrieve any trial exhibits on

behalf of your client, please do so by January 20, 2006. Please call me to make

arrangements. Any exhibits not retrieved by this date will be discarded.

Sincerely,

s/Mary Brown 

Mary Brown

Case Manager to Judge Beckwith

cc: File

Case 1:01-cv-00125-SSB-TSH Document 160 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
Clarence JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. Sedrick SIMMS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0378

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Peter H. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3159

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         506,299
<SECURITIES>                                 3,608,418
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,195,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                   122,587
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         162,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,205,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      6,826,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         58
<COMMON>                                         1,231
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,229,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,205,579
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,034,405
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  705,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               105,377
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                223,827
<INCOME-TAX>                                    80,269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            143,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   143,188
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q IS UNCLASSIFIED.
<F2>INTEREST EXPENSE IS CONSIDERED AN OPERATING EXPENSE FOR THE REGISTRANT AS THE
REGISTRANT'S PRIMARY SOURCE OF INCOME IS INTEREST EARNED ON CREDIT CARD LOANS.
<F3>EPS ON A FULLY DILUTED BASIS IS NOT PRESENTED.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:18-cr-109-11

v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE

JESSICA MARTIN,

Defendant.

CRIMINAL MINUTES: CHANGE OF PLEA ON INDICTMENT

Defendant appeared by video with counsel Richard Goldberg

Defendant advised of right to appear in person, but consented to appear by video

Defendant arraigned and specifically advised of rights

Plea Agreement summarized by AUSA Megan Gaffney Painter

Statement of Facts read by AUSA Megan Gaffney Painter

Defendant pled GUILTY to Count 1

Plea accepted by the Court

Referred to Probation Department for Presentence Report

Defendant to remain on O.R. Bond

Judge: Douglas R. Cole

Courtroom Deputy: Scott Lang

Court Reporter: Lisa Conley-Yunglut-Official

Date: April 28, 2021

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 194 Filed: 04/28/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1105
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leland W. Brantley, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ LELAND W. BRANTLEY, JR.Leland W. Brantley, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerAugust 10, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000883369
<NAME> FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,261
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,101
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,987
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    206
<INCOME-TAX>                                        89
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       117
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549
                                   Form 10-KSB

[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
    EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                   FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
                         Commission File Number 0-14910

                             MPM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

WASHINGTON                                             81-0436060
----------                                             ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of          (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
incorporation or organization)

                 199 POMEROY ROAD, PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07054
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 973-428-5009


The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following items, financial
information, exhibits or other portions of its Annual Report on Form 10KSB for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as set forth in the pages attached
hereto:

1. Section 906

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this Amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                             MPM Technologies, Inc.
                                  (Registrant)


                           By: /s/ Michael J. Luciano
                               ----------------------
                               Michael J. Luciano

                         Title: Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of MPM Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Michael
J. Luciano, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the company.


/s/ Michael J. Luciano
-------------------------------
Michael J. Luciano
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004