alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.19


PLURALSIGHT, INC.




August 10, 2018


Leah C. Johnson


Dear Leah,


On behalf of Pluralsight, Inc. (the “Company”), I am pleased to invite you to join the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), subject to your election to the Board (the date of such election being the “Effective Date”), which we anticipate will be October 30, 2018. You will serve as a director from the Effective Date until the date upon which you are not re-elected or your earlier removal or resignation.
In consideration for your service on the Board and subject to approval by the Board, you will be eligible to receive the following compensation:


		
	•
	10,000 Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) covering your period of service through May 2019. This grant may be pro-rated based on the actual Effective Date of your start with the Board.


		
	•
	Annual RSU award with a grant date fair value of USD $186,000.00 effective the day of the 2019 annual meeting, expected in May 2019 (the “Annual Meeting Date”).


		
	•
	USD $30,000.00 annually beginning on the Annual Meeting Date.


		
	•
	Additional annual cash payments depending on committee service, beginning on the Annual Meeting Date.


The Company will reimburse you for all reasonable travel expenses that you incur in connection with your attendance at meetings of the Board, in accordance with the Company’s expense reimbursement policy as in effect from time to time. In addition, you will receive indemnification as a director of the Company to the maximum extent extended to directors of the Company generally, as set forth in the Company’s certificate of incorporation, bylaws, an indemnification agreement between the Company and you (which will be provided to you upon the Effective Date) and any director and officer insurance the Company may have and maintain from time to time.
In accepting this offer, you are representing to us that (i) you do not know of any conflict which would restrict your service on the Board and (ii) you will not provide the Company with any documents, records, or other confidential information belonging to other parties.
This letter sets forth the entire compensation you will receive for your service on the Board. Nothing in this letter should be construed as an offer of employment. If the foregoing terms are agreeable, please indicate your acceptance by signing the letter in the space provided below.
Kind Regards,


/s/ Aaron Skonnard


Aaron Skonnard
Chief Executive Officer


Accepted and agreed:


/s/ Leah C. Johnson
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PAREXEL International Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, James F. Winschel, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 28, 2008 |  | /s/ James F. Winschel, Jr.                       
|                      |  | James F. Winschel, Jr.                           
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PAREXEL
International Corporation and will be retained by PAREXEL International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Jacquelynne O. MILLER, Appellant, v. TOWNE PARK NORTH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-1498

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 3, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Ranita L. TONEY

NO. 2018-KK-0759

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
Aubrey Bernard LAVENDER v. STATE

CR-15-1288

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1281 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 

clinic in Gaylord, Michigan, as the ‘‘Navy Corpsman Steve Andrews 

Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2021 

Mr. BERGMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in Gaylord, Michigan, as the 

‘‘Navy Corpsman Steve Andrews Department of Veterans 

Affairs Health Care Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 

5 GAYLORD, MICHIGAN. 

6 The Department of Veterans Affairs community7 based outpatient clinic located at 2782 S. Otsego Avenue, 

8 Gaylord, Michigan, shall after the date of the enactment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1281 IH

1 of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Navy Corps2 man Steve Andrews Department of Veterans Affairs 

3 Health Care Clinic’’. Any reference to such clinic in any 

4 law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of 

5 the United States shall be considered to be a reference 

6 to the Navy Corpsman Steve Andrews Department of Vet7 erans Affairs Health Care Clinic. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          36,953
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,536
<PP&E>                                          31,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,505
<BONDS>                                         20,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           149
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,474
<SALES>                                         35,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,662
<CGS>                                           20,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,989)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,964)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (26,846)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,871)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.48)
        

</TABLE>
Sophie ELLISON, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and Mahnaz Qayyum Medical Enterprises, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2025

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ronald Carl WESTENDORF, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Chad CHRONISTER, Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0168

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 25, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted without prejudice to the State's right to seek to modify bail in compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131 (d)(2). Within three days, the trial court shall reinstate the bond amount of $150,000 and strike the condition of pretrial release that petitioner not have contact with any known Outlaws gang member.

KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
-

-d'"-\v1 D

-~

AN"" - /I.? I

~

'7/30fr6

;r.,~

~

~'6/03/,,,

;::-.: II""

(4910-1

• •

RIN 212Q-AA64

Federal AviatioD Administration

!

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration <fAA), Department of Transportation

i O>O~. I

.

ACIlON: Fmal mIe; request for comments. I

SUMM.AR.Y: Weare.adopting a new aUwo4ess directive (AD) for the products Ii

I

above. This AD results from mimdafory CODtinpmg airworthiness infonnation (MeAl)

o.~';";.o'ed byan ."ration .. _.... 4WUOmyO f anothcr i untry I to'tucu .'-tify and·oorrectan ._-> WU>G.Le

condition on an aviation product. The MOO d 1besthe unsafe condition as:

Several inservi~ events related to van J eleCtrical systems, have led to

the discovery of a'connnon 'root cause: l~lika:ge failure mode of Transient ..

Voltage Suppressor (TVS) diodes used d Power Distribution Control

Units (pDctJ) cards or GeneratOr COD$.lIUirit (GCU) cards in the

Primary Power Distribution Boxes -(pP. B). Due to ouch TVS diode

failure m.ode. operation of some eloctri lcircuits is de~~ ~ some

control S1gna1s are seht-tmex.pected 1 lS•.Fl1!f;ber analysIS mdicated that

combination of a lVS diode fail~ wi6ther systems failmes could

significantlyreduce flightsafety. I

•• * • !*

!

i

1

i

DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORIATION I

i

!

,

14CFRPart 39 OlQOO I

[Docket No. FAA.201O-uu-*; Dirtttorate Ibtifier 2016-NM-162-AD;

. \c"LJ10. l'b-O:l. .

Ame.ndment 39.u..l ; AD1010-"·-) 'i

I

Airworthiness Directives;.Das~ult-Aviation ~odel FALCON 7X Airplanes

nus AD requires actions lha1:are intended to dress the unsafe condition described in

theMCAI.

FAA Form 1360014,.1 (&089) OfFlCWrfllE Y

.lJ.t,JlPO:l-.o-TM-01VZ(l'C11
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GARY PALMER,

Appellant,

v.

RICARDO REYES, TOBIN & REYES, P.A., JORGE MORRELL, 

WOOLBRIGHT DEVELOPMENT, INC.,

PRINCIPAL ESTATE INVESTORS, LLC a/k/a

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP a/k/a

PRINCIPAL SOUTHPORT RETAIL MEMBER, LLC and

SOUTHPORT LLC,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-794

[February 24, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John B. Bowman, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19-

25655.

Michael A. Rosenberg, Gregory Willis, Peter Weinstein and Adrianna 

de la Cruz-Muñoz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for 

appellant.

Ricardo Reyes and Sacha A. Boegem of Tobin & Reyes, Boca Raton, 

for appellees Ricardo Reyes, Tobin & Reyes, P.A., Jorge Morell, and 

Woolbright Development, Inc.

Nelson C. Bellido and Jeffrey R. Geldens of Roig Lawyers, Miami, for 

appellees Principal Real Estate Investors LLC, Southport Retail LLC, and 

Southport Retail Member LLC.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *
2

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CHAPTER 33-15-15 PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION OF AIR QUALITY

Section 33-15-15-01 33-15-15-01.1 33-15-15-01.2 33-15-15-02 General Provisions [Repealed] Purpose Scope Reclassification

33-15-15-01. General provisions. Repealed effective February 1, 2005.

33-15-15-01.1. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to adopt by referencefederal provisions forthe prevention ofsignificantdeterioration program in North Dakota. The department will continue to implement the prevention of significantdeterioration program as part ofthe state implementation plan.

History: Effective February 1, 2005. General Authority: NDCC 23-25-03, 23-25-04.1 Law Implemented: NDCC 23-25-03, 23-25-04.1

33-15-15-01.2. Scope. The provisions of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations part52, section 21, paragraphs (a)(2) through (e), (h) through (r), (v), (w), (aa), and (bb) as they exist on July 1, 2013, are incorporated by reference intothis chapter. This includes revisions to the rules thatwere published as afinal rule in the Federal Register by this date but had not been published in the Code of Federal Regulations yet. Any changes or additions to the provisions are listed belowthe affected paragraph.



### 1History: EffectiveFebruary 1, 2005; amendedeffectiveApril 1, 2009;April 1, 2011; January 1, 2013; April 1, 2014. GeneralAuthority: NDCC 23-25-03, 23-25-04.1



### 8
Miguel ARGUETA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BRISTOL NMB PARTNERS, Limited Partnership, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1933

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 14, 2017

Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari, and the response and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LUCK, JJ., concur.
EX-4.4(k)






 Exhibit 4.4(k) 

Schedule of Omitted Supplements to U.S. Guarantee Agreement 

The supplements to the U.S. guarantee agreement referenced below are substantially identical in all material respects to the Supplement No. 14 dated as
of November 9, 2015 to the U.S. Guarantee dated as of November 17, 2006, as amended and restated as of February 26, 2014, as supplemented (the “U.S. Guarantee Agreement”) and filed as Exhibit 4.4(j) to the Company’s
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual Report”), except as to the names of the additional U.S. guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto and
the dates on which such supplements to the U.S. Guarantee Agreement were entered into. These supplements to the U.S. Guarantee Agreement are not being filed as exhibits to the Annual Report in reliance on Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation
S-K. 
 Supplements to the U.S. Guarantee Agreement entered into among HCA Inc., Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent, and the following subsidiaries as additional U.S. guarantors, as of the dates indicated: 
  

					
	 Supplement Number
	  	 Date
	  	 Additional U.S. Guarantors

			
	No. 13	  	January 9, 2015	  	 •  Citrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.

 
 •  Citrus Memorial Property
Management, Inc.
  
 •  CHCA
Pearland, L.P
  
 •  Columbia
Healthcare System of Louisiana, Inc.
  

•  HCA Pearland GP, Inc.
  

•  Mountain Division – CVH, LLC

 
 •  Pearland Partner, LLC

 
 •  Primary Health, Inc.

 
 •  Primary Health Management,
Ltd.
  
 •  Sarah Cannon
Research Institute, LLC
  

•  SCRI Holdings, LLC
  

•  Southpoint, LLC
  

•  Vision Consulting Group LLC

 
 •  Vision Holdings, LLC

 
 •  WCP Properties,
LLC

			
	No. 15	  	January 10, 2017	  	 •  East Florida – DMC, Inc.

 
 •  H2U Wellness Centers, LLC

 
 •  JPM AA Housing, LLC

 
 •  MediCredit, Inc.

 
 •  Oklahoma Holding Company,
LLC
  
 •  Outpatient Services
Holdings, Inc.
  
 •  Oviedo
Medical Center, LLC
  
 •  SSHR
Holdco, LLC
  
 •  The Outsource
Group, Inc.
















					
			
	No. 16	  	January 3, 2018	  	 •  Cy-Fair Medical Center Hospital, LLC

 
 •  Houston NW Manager, LLC

 
 •  Houston – PPH, LLC

 
 •  North Houston – TRMC,
LLC
  
 •  Plaza Specialty
Hospital, LLC
  
 •  Savannah
Health Services, LLC
  

•  Sebring Health Services, LLC

 
 •  Southeast Georgia Health
Services, LLC
  
 •  Weatherford
Health Services, LLC



  
 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00508-CV

Rudy MENDEZ,

Appellant

v.

City of San Antonio Building 

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD,

Appellee 

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-08659

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. The district 

clerk’s pending Notification of Late Record is, therefore, moot. Costs of appeal are assessed 

against appellant.

SIGNED September 10, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Malcolm WATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-219

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018

William R. Ponall of Ponall Law, Maitland, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ha Thu Dao, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Laurie Benoit-Knox, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Malcolm Watkins appeals his judgment and sentences for (1) use of a computer to solicit a child for unlawful sexual activity in violation of section 847.0135(3)(b), Florida Statutes (2010) ; (2) traveling to meet a child for the purpose of engaging in unlawful sexual activity in violation of section 847.0135(4)(b) ; (3) attempted lewd battery on a child in violation of sections 800.04(4) and 777.04, Florida Statutes (2010) ; and (4) unlawful use of a two-way communications device in violation of section 934.215, Florida Statutes (2010). Of the several claims Watkins raises, we find merit only to the claim that convictions for both traveling to meet a minor and unlawful use of a two-way communications device violate double jeopardy. "[P]roof of the unlawful use of a two-way communications device [is] subsumed *342within the proof of the ... traveling offense[ ]," *Batchelor v. State*, 193 So.3d 1054, 1058 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (quoting *Mizner v. State*, 154 So.3d 391, 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ), and "there is no indication in the record that these two crimes were committed other than as part of the same criminal episode," *Bermudez v. State*, No. 15-4361, 235 So.3d 1057, 1057, 2018 WL 560369 at *1 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 26, 2018). Because one of the two offenses Watkins was convicted of was entirely proven by the other, and the record shows that Watkins had committed both offenses during the same criminal episode, convictions for both offenses violated double jeopardy. *See**Chepelevich v. State*, 184 So.3d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). As such, we reverse and remand for the trial court to vacate Watkins' judgment and sentence for unlawful use of a two-way communications device. We affirm all other claims raised in this appeal.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Ellina KNIGHT, Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee FOR MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, MANA SERIES 2007-A2, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Eric Ronaldo Garay VILLEGAS, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-2411

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 9, 2017

Decided: August 16, 2017

*62Jay S. Marks, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Nancy Friedman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kevin J. Conway, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Ronaldo Garay Villegas, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the Board’s order, in conjunction with the administrative record, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2017). We therefore deny the petition for review substantially* for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re Garay Villegas*(B.I.A. Nov. 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*

*

**Even assuming that Garay Villegas substantially complied with the requirements set forth in *In re Lozada,*19 I. *&*N. Dec. 637 (B.I.A. 1988), as he contends, substantial evidence supports the Board’s alternative conclusion that "the face of the record itself does not demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel."
EX PARTE Edward FEARS

(In re: Auto Owners Insurance Company et al. v. Edward Fears)

2160387

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2016

- 0459

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM081AD

A330

- 32

- 3269

--- 02/17/2015

A340

- 32

- 4301

--- 02/17/2015

A340

- 32

- 5115

--- 02/17/2015

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008