alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES,

Plaintiff,

-v- Case No. 2-18-CR-147

Judge Graham 

BILAL A. EL YOUSSEPH,

Defendant.

DEFENSE COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL UNDER

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

Undersigned counsel respectfully requests that the Court issue an order terminating him

as counsel of record for Defendant, Bilal A. El Yousseph, and appointing new counsel under the

Criminal Justice Act to handle his case in the district court, for the reasons set forth in the

accompanying memorandum.

s/Joseph R. Landusky

_________________________

Joseph R. Landusky (0038073)

901 South High Street

Columbus, Ohio 43206

(614) 449-0449

Joelandusky@aol.com

Attorney for Bilal A. El Yousseph

MEMORANDUM

Counsel was retained by Mr. El Yousseph to defend him concerning the charges in the

instant action. At that time, Mr. El-Yousseph provided counsel with a portion of the agreed

Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 22
retainer. That partial retainer has been exhausted. Mr. El Yousseph is not able to pay any further

on the retainer agreed upon by the parties. Mr. El Yousseph is now indigent and has filed an

affidavit of indigency (Doc.9). It is respectfully requested that the Court issue an Order

terminating Joseph R. Landusky as counsel of record for Defendant, Bilal El Yousseph, and

appoint counsel under the Criminal Justice Act to handle his case in the district court on his

behalf.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Joseph R. Landusky

_________________________

Joseph R. Landusky (0038073)

901 South High Street

Columbus, Ohio 43206

(614) 449-0449

Joelandusky@aol.com

Attorney for Bilal El 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This motion was served on opposing counsel using the Court’s CM/ECF system this 22nd 

 day of August 2018; Defendant Bilal El Yousseph was served by regular U.S. mail service,

postage pre-paid this 22nd day of August 2018 to FCCII, 2460 Jackson Pike, Columbus, Ohio

43223.

s/Joseph R. Landusky

_________________________

Joseph R. Landusky

2

Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 23
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 135 

To require the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to report 

to the Congress semiannually on the number of firearms transfers resulting from the failure to complete a background check within 3 business 

days, and the procedures followed after it is discovered that a firearm 

transfer has been made to a transferee who is ineligible to receive 

a firearm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to report to the Congress semiannually on the number of firearms transfers resulting from the failure to 

complete a background check within 3 business days, 

and the procedures followed after it is discovered that 

a firearm transfer has been made to a transferee who 

is ineligible to receive a firearm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 135 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accidental Firearms 

3 Transfers Reporting Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FBI REPORT ON FIREARMS TRANSFERS RESULTING 

5 FROM THE FAILURE TO COMPLETE A BACK6 GROUND CHECK WITHIN 3 BUSINESS DAYS, 

7 AND THE PROCEDURES FOLLOWED AFTER IT 

8 IS DISCOVERED THAT A FIREARM TRANSFER 

9 HAS BEEN MADE TO A TRANSFEREE WHO IS 

10 INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE A FIREARM. 

11 Within 120 days after the date of the enactment of 

12 this Act and every 6 months thereafter, the Director of 

13 the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall submit to the 

14 Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representa15 tives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate 

16 a written report on— 

17 (1) the number of proposed firearm transfers— 

18 (A) about which a person licensed under 

19 chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, con20 tacted the national instant criminal background 

21 check system established under section 103 of 

22 the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act; 

23 (B) with respect to which the system failed 

24 to respond to the licensee within 3 business 

25 days; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 135 IH

1 (C) which were completed in the period 

2 covered by the report; and 

3 (2) the procedures followed after it is discovered 

4 that a firearm transfer has been made to a trans5 feree who is ineligible to receive a firearm. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              15,639
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       71,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                             840,462
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     990,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              891,197
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             3,665
<OTHER-SE>                                          95,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       990,046
<SALES>                                            164,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   164,017
<CGS>                                               17,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    90,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8,480
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     47,630
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 47,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        47,630
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.01)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     317,420
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               75,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           593,781
<PP&E>                                   1,474,327
<DEPRECIATION>                             323,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          31,482,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      931,126
<BONDS>                                    654,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                     27
<COMMON>                                   180,867
<OTHER-SE>                              29,716,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            31,482,886
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,868
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        10,058,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       3,689,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (10,050,450)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (8,226,228)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        (1,824,222)
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                          (10,050,450)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.94)
        


</TABLE>
Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW Document 126 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 1 of 1
Edward WEBB, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Florida Commission on Offender Review, Appellees.

No. 1D17-4812

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge REYES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51066 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jorge Reyes, Jr., Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Reyes, Jr., has moved for leave to *137withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *137the- limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID 0648-XB771]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Tilefish Advisory Panel will hold a public webinar meeting. See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         for agenda details.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Thursday, February 24, 2022, from 9 a.m. until 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information will be posted to the calendar prior to the meeting at                         *www.mafmc.org.*

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331;                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of this meeting is for the Advisory Panel to develop a fishery performance report (FPR) for both golden and blueline tilefish. The intent of the FPR is to facilitate a venue for structured input from the Advisory Panel for the tilefish specifications processes. The FPR will be used by the MAFMC's Scientific and Statistical Committee and the Tilefish Monitoring Committee when reviewing golden tilefish specifications and setting blueline tilefish specifications.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

*Authority:*16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: January 31, 2022.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2022-02287 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129070 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129070 

 COA: 254587 

Otsego CC: 03-002953-FC 

JESSIE WAYNE PILLETTE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 14, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk
Jonas HENDERSON, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5082

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Massie et al. v. Enyart et al.

Exemption : *Personal pi-operty not exempt from judgments for fraud.*

The exemption of personal property is in cases of debt by contract only; and a judgment or decree for tort or fraud is not a debt by contract, nor are the-costs, which are but an incident of the judgment.

MotioN to vacate *supersedeas.*

*Davidson,*for the motion.

*Pettigrew*— J. *D. Wallcer,*contra.

Harrison, J.:

The appellants having sued out an execution upon the decree in this court in their favor against the appellees for the cost of the appeal in this case, the appellees filed with the clerk schedules of property they claimed to hold exempt from the execution — one including a homestead, and the clerk thereupon issued a supersedeas as to the property so scheduled.

The appellants, for the cause that the execution is not for-the collection of a debt by contract, have filed a motion to quash the supersedeas. As will be seen by the report of the *case*— Massie *et al.*v. *Enyart et al,*30 Ark., 251 — the action was in equity, and brought by the appellants against the appel-lees to set aside a deed of conveyance of a tract of land, upon the ground that it was made in fraud of the plaintiffs.’’ rights *689as creditors of the grantor, and that the same *was*for that cause by the decree set aside and canceled.

There can be no question as to the exemption of the homestead.

The homestead of a resident of the State, who is married, or the head of a family, and the owner in this case is shown to be such, is not subject to sale under execution, or other process,, upon any judgment or decree whatever, not rendered for “the purchase money, or for specific liens, laborers’ or mechanics’ liens for improving the same, or for taxes, or against executors, administrators, guardians, receivers, attorneys for moneys collected by them, and other trustees of an express-trust for moneys due from them in their fiduciary capacity.” *Cons., Art. IX., Sec.*8.

The exemption of personal property is, in cases of debt,vby contract only. Section 1 of said article.

A judgment or decree in an action for tort, or fraud, is not a debt by contract, nor are the costs, which are but an incident of the judgment or decree. 2 *Tidd,*945. If the defendant’s-personal property is not exempt from sale under an execution,, for the damages recovered against him in an action for torts,, we are unable to understand why it should be for the cost, the mere incident of the damages. In New York, it is expressly-held that a judgment rendered against the plaintiff for costs in an action brought by such plaintiff for damages for an alleged tort, is not a judgment for a “debt contracted,” within the meaning of the exemption law of that State. *Schoulton*v. *Kilner,*8 How. Pr., 527; *Latterof*v. *Singer,*39 Barb., 396; and see *Thompson on Homesteads and Exemptions,*Sec. 383.

Proceedings against the homestead were properly stayed and superseded, but there being in this case no exemption of the personal property, the supersedeas as to that must be quashed.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00030-CR

ANDRES ALVAREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 41,518-A

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Andres Alvarez, appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion was 

signed by both Alvarez and his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2(a), we grant the 

motion.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: June 2, 2014

Date Decided: June 3, 2014

Do Not Publish
Room 5426 K , 1200 Penns y lvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460

202-564-3206

mccabe. j anet@epa.gov

-----"Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic

_ J.

_ Mancini@omb.eop.gov> wrote: ----- To: Janet McCabe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
From: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic

_ J.

_ Mancini@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 08/11/2011 11:20PM Subject: RE: couple things

Hello Janet,

Sorry haven’t been able to turn around additional ozone comments. Still hope to do so tonight.

Yes, the meeting is scheduled for 9:30 on my calendar as well. Hopefully is not at 9, but if so we will

both be late ;)

Finally, on CO, I hear we are just waiting for the final documents, but there was a technical glitch. If

you haven’t already, may be worth checking in with folks to make sure there is nothing that would

prevent timely conclusion of review tomorrow morning. I doubt there is, but better to be safe.

Thanks!

Dom

From: McCabe.Janet@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:McCabe.Janet@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, A u g ust 11, 2011 10:10 A M

To: Mancini, Dominic J. Subject: couple things

Dom--

--We are ok with the CO monitor approach you and I talked about yesterday: one monitor in each CBSA greater than 1M. the ones in the 2.5M areas by 2015 and the ones in the 1M areas by 2017. Staff are doing the redline and will get that to you guys today. thanks for working through that with us.

--Will we be getting more ozone interagency comments today? I know Christine's out, but I hate to lose an entire day. Even if some of them can come over, it would be very helpful. And do you have a sense

of whether there will be more?--lastly--the meeting friday morning? I just wanted to confirm the starting time. Avi and I both have 9:30

on our calendars but Michael said 9.....

Thanks....

Janet McCabe Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator
Office of Air and Radiation, USEPA Room 5426K, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460

202-564-3206

mccabe. j anet@epa.gov
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

riy. j 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

DOT-OST-1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

STATUS REPORT 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: May 28, 2010. 

Respectfully submitted. 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Dayton Lehman, Jr. 

Deputy Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

William J. Wagner 

Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 28th day of May, 2010, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Bv Personal Service 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

Bv First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408