alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                               CERTIFICATION UNDER
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glacier Water Services, Inc., (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. David
Walters, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of
               the dates indicated and results of operations of the Company for
               the periods indicated.


/s/ W. David Walters
--------------------

W. David Walters
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 07, 2004
#### Fred SAMIMI, M.D., Petitioner, v. U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Respondent.

No. 14-71315

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 18, 2017 *

Filed January 30, 2017

Fred Samimi, M.D., Pro Se

Anita J. Gay, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fred Samimi, M.D., appeals pro se from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) Administrator’s judgment denying his applications for DEA Certificates of Registration. We have jurisdiction under 21 U.S.C. § 877. We review for substantial evidence the agency s factual findings, *id.,*and for an abuse of discretion the agency’s decision, *Fry v. Drug Enforcement Agency,*353 F.3d 1041, 1043 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The DEA Administrator’s denial of Dr. Samimi’s applications for Certificates of Registration was not an abuse of discretion because substantial evidence supported the Administrator’s finding that Dr. Samimi committed acts that were inconsistent with the public interest. *See*21 U.S.C. § 823(f); *N.L.R.B. v. Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local 48,*345 F.3d 1049, 1054 (9th Cir. 2003) (“Substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion” (citations omitted)); *Fry,*353 F.3d at 1043 (agency decision is not arbitrary and capricious if “based on a consideration of the relevant factors and there is no clear error of judgment” (citation omitted)). Contrary to Dr. Samimi’s contentions, the sanction imposed by the Administrator was not impermissi-bly severe. *See Spencer Livestock Comm’n Co. v. Dep’t of Agric.,*841 F.2d 1451, 1456-57 (9th Cir. 1988) (“[T]he employment of a sanction within the authority of an administrative agency is ... not rendered invalid in a particular case because it is more severe than sanctions imposed in other cases ... Therefore, mere unevenness in the application of the sanction does not render its application in a particular case ‘unwarranted in law.’ ” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
WLtoys V303 Auto Pathfinder FPV Drone with GPS + Camera Mount 

First Person View (FPV) Display while flying included
With 6-axis system left and right crab flying / hanged flying / 360
Degree rotating / light
GPS auto pilot function
Come home button ready
Low voltage protection (two levels)
Failsafe and self-landing
CF headless mode
PTZ gyro-stabilized
Built-in Gyro: Yes
Remote Control: 2.4GHz Wireless Remote Control, Built-in LCD Display
Channel: 4-Channels
Mode: Mode 2 (Left Hand Throttle)
Size:30.530.518.5cm
Diagonal Wheelbase:37.6cm
Flight time:13-15 Minutes
Maxium Flight weight 925g including camera

1. Zerotech GPS Hold system
2. Altitude hold system
3. CF headless mode
4. 1 touch gohome
5. Failsafe to return home & Landing
6. Low voltage protection
7. Control distance: 500 metres
8. Charging time: 1.5 - 2 hours
9. Flying time: 13 - 15 minutes
10. Battery: 11.1V 2700mAh 25C
Horace Lee HANKERSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0789

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
### Electroplating F acilities in Puerto Rico

Electroplating Source s in Each Facility

Facility Name Process (Decorative,

Hard or Anodizing) Tank Capacity 1
(Gallons) Total Installed

Rectifier Capacity (Amperes) Standard Operating

Limits Maximum

Allowed Operating Time (hrs/yr) Actual Operating

Time (hrs/yr) Emissions

Cont rol

Quality Electroplating Decorative 700 1,500 Surface Tension 45 dynes/cm 4,160 4,160 Combination wetting agent/fume

suppresant Alcan Packaging
Puerto Rico, Inc. ( Lawson

- Mardon

W heaton of PR

Inc. ) Hard Chrome Plating 50 300 Concentration of

total chrom ium in

the exhaust gas stream discharged to the atmosphere 0.03 mg/dscm 8, 736 8,400 Packed bed

scrubber

Velázquez Hydraulic Services Decorative 1,167 (4’x 10’) 5,000 Surface T ension 45 dynes/cm 2.496 1,300 Combination wetting agent/fume

suppresant

1 Tan k Dimensions (l ongitude and w ide) are not available. County_Name Fac ID Facility Name Street City State Zip Comments
Bayamon 3687 Bayamon Bumpers Carr.#2 Km.16.8 Bayamon PR 00960 Closed

Caguas Quality Electroplating State Road #1 Km. 34.2
Villa Blanca Industrial Park,

Sakura St. Caguas PR 00726

Operating Cayey 3690 Lawson

- Mardon

- Wheaton of PR

Inc. PR #1 Km. 156.4 Bo. Monte

Llano Cayey PR 00737

San Juan 3693 Velazquez Hydraulic Services Calle Brisas Final L o t e 7,

Sabana Llana San Juan PR
FOIA Requested Record J-14-0100 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 27 of 50




FOIA Requested Record J-14-0100 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 32 of 50
Anthony J. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5318

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
exv10w20






EXHIBIT
10.20




EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2009 SALARIES




     The Leadership and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Nashua Corporation
approved the following 2009 annual base salaries for Nashua Corporation’s named executive officers
(as defined in Item 402(m)(2) of Regulation S-K):



	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Position	 	Date Approved	 	2009 Base Salary
	Thomas G. Brooker 
	 	February 13, 2009	 	$416,000
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	John L. Patenaude 
	 	February 13, 2009	 	$235,000
	Vice President — Finance, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	William Todd McKeown 
	 	February 13, 2009	 	$262,000
	Vice President of Sales and Marketing
	 	 	 	 






The above base salaries remained unchanged from 2008.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1153 

To eliminate certain benefits for former Presidents convicted of a felony, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2021 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York (for himself and Ms. JAYAPAL) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To eliminate certain benefits for former Presidents convicted 

of a felony, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring and Enforc5 ing Accountability of Presidents Act’’ or the ‘‘REAP Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FORFEITURE OF BENEFITS FOR FORMER PRESI7 DENTS CONVICTED OF A FELONY. 

8 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide retirement, cler9 ical assistants, and free mailing privileges to former Presi10 dents of the United States, and for other purposes’’, apVerDate Sep 11 2014 16:45 Mar 13, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1153.IH H1153

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1153 IH

1 proved August 25, 1958 (commonly known as the 

2 ‘‘Former Presidents Act of 1958’’; 3 U.S.C. 102 note), 

3 is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Each former 

5 President’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subsection (h), 

6 each former President’’; 

7 (2) in subsection (f), by striking paragraph (2) 

8 and inserting: 

9 ‘‘(2) who has not been impeached by the House 

10 of Representatives and convicted by the Senate pur11 suant to the impeachment.’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub13 section: 

14 ‘‘(h)(1) If a former President is finally convicted of 

15 a felony for which every act or omission that is needed 

16 to satisfy the elements of the felony is committed during 

17 or after the period such former President holds the office 

18 of President of the United States of America, or was fi19 nally convicted of such a felony while holding such office— 

20 ‘‘(A) no monetary allowance under subsection 

21 (a) may be provided to such former President; 

22 ‘‘(B) no funds may be obligated or expended 

23 under subsection (g) with respect to such former 

24 President except to the extent necessary to maintain 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1153 IH

1 the security of such former President, as determined 

2 by the Director of the Secret Service; and 

3 ‘‘(C) such former President shall repay any 

4 amounts received under subsection (a) during the 

5 period beginning on the date on which such former 

6 President is initially convicted of the felony and end7 ing on the date such former President is finally con8 victed of the felony. 

9 ‘‘(2) The term ‘finally convicted’ means a convic10 tion— 

11 ‘‘(A) which has not been appealed and is no 

12 longer appealable because the time for taking an ap13 peal has expired; or 

14 ‘‘(B) which has been appealed and the appeals 

15 process for which is completed.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
 This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Protocol
Systems, Inc.'s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1997 and
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended March
31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000883322
<NAME> PROTOCOL SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,648
<SECURITIES>                                    16,846
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,232<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       255
<INVENTORY>                                     13,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,292
<PP&E>                                          12,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,412
<SALES>                                         13,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,193
<CGS>                                            6,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     80
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 55
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        55
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[user]

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION

This is to certify that the certificate of organization of 

was this day issued and admitted to record in this office and that 

the said limited liability company is authorized to transact its 

business subject to all Virginia laws applicable to the company 

and its business. Effective date: 

State Corporation Commission

Attest:

Clerk of the Commission

Richmond, March 4, 2015

New Heights Aerial Photography LLC

March 4, 2015 CISECOM
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02591]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Thursday, February 17, 2022.

PLACE: Via Conference Call.

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Regular Board of Directors meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his 
opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the Government in 
the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (4) permit closure of the 
following portion(s) of this meeting:

<bullet> Executive Session

Agenda

I. CALL TO ORDER
II. Sunshine Act Approval of Executive Session
III. Executive Session Report from CEO
IV. Executive Session: Report from CFO
V. Executive Session: NeighborWorks Compass<SUP>TM</SUP> Update
VI. Action Item Approval of Minutes
VII. Action Item HUD Counseling Grant
VIII. Discussion Item Interim CIO Report
IX. Discussion Item End of FY17-FY21 Strategic Plan Scorecard
X. Discussion Item Kansas City and New York Offices Lease Discussion
XI. Health Insurance Special Delegation of Authority
XII. Adjournment

    Portions Open to the Public: Everything except the Executive 
Session.
    Portions Closed to the Public: Executive Session.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lakeyia Thompson, Special 
Assistant, (202) 524-9940; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d29ea6babdbfa2a1bdbc92bca5fcbda0b5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bd7eff3f4f6ebe8f4f5dbf5ecb5f4e9fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

Lakeyia Thompson,
Special Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2022-02591 Filed 2-3-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Albert C. BURGESS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John D. ELLIOTT; Scott Elliott, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6678

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 17, 2017

Decided: August 22, 2017

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tucker S. Player, PLAYER LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Drew Hamilton Butler, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Charleston, South Carolina; Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as barred by the statute of limitations his civil action for legal malpractice and tortious interference with contract and additionally dismissing his legal malpractice claim for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Burgess v. Elliott,*No. 3:16-cv-03325-RBH, 2017 WL 1505421 (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 9 -00 180 -CV

M uham m ad Y . A hm e d , A ppe lla nt

v. Randall R. Mallory , Appellee

FR OM C OU N T Y C OU R T A T L A W N O. 1 OF T R A V IS C OU N T Y NO. C-1- CV-08 -01 3056 , HO NORAB LE ERIC SHEP P ERD , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Muhammad Y . Ahmed appe als from the county court’s or der in fa

vor of
a pp e lle e Rand a ll R. Ma llo ry in A hm ed’s su it a g a ins t Ma llo ry fo r f or c ibl e e ntr

y and de ta ine r i n
re latio n to c omm e rc ia l pr op e rt y loc a ted i n T ra

vis County . M a llo ry

ha s f ile d a mot ion to d ism iss , asser ting that this Court does not have jur isdiction over the appea l in light of section 24.007 of the pr op e rt y c od e , w hic h s tate s, in r e le va nt p art , “ A fi na l jud g me nt of a c ounty c ourt in a n e vic tio n s uit may not be appe aled on the issue of poss ession unless the premises in question are being used for residential pur

poses.” Tex . Prop. Code Ann. § 24.007 (West 2000). Unde r sec tion 24.007, we lack j uri s d i ct i o n t o re v i ew th e co un ty co urt ’s d et erm i n at i o n o f th e r i gh to f p o s s es s i o nan d an y fi n d i n gs essential to the issue of posse ssion. See Terra X XI, Ltd. v. Ag Acc eptanceCorp. , 280 S.W .3d 414, 416 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, pet. filed) (collec ting case s). While Ahmed asser ts that the Court improperly

denied his reque sted relief and issued err oneous conclusions of law, all re lief soug ht by2

Ahmed and a ll conclusions of law issued by the county

court are based on the i ssue of possession. See A cadem

y Corp. v. Sunwest N.O.P., Inc

. , 853 S.W .2d 833, 834 (Tex. App.—Houston [14t h Dist.] 1993, writ denied) (appe lla t e co u rt m ay not reviewpoints of error based on “ the merits of possession”). The county court’s or der c oncer

ns only possession of the pre mises in that it awards possession to Mallory

an d d o es n o t award monetar y damag es. Ahmed doe s not dispute that the proper ty at issue is not being used for residential purposes. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Mallory ’s m otion is gr anted to the e x tent we dismiss this appeal. Any other re quested relief is denied.

__________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and He nson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Jul y

1, 2009
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27369-27370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11270]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and 
Community Service gives notice of the following meeting:

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, May 15, 2013, 9:00-10:30 a.m.

PLACE: Corporation for National and Community Service, 1201 New York 
Avenue NW., Suite 8312, Washington, DC 20525 (Please go to 10th floor 
reception area for escort).

[[Page 27370]]

CALL-IN INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public through 
the following toll-free call-in number: 888-889-5014 conference call 
access code number 5933738. Any interested member of the public may 
call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur 
charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, and CNCS will not 
refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls 
they initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone 
number. Replays are generally available one hour after a call ends. The 
toll-free phone number for the replay is 866-507-3580, replay passcode 
3603. The end replay date is May 29, 2013, 10:59 p.m. (CT).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
I. Chair's Opening Comments
    a. Call to Order, Welcome, and Preview of Today's Meeting Agenda
    b. Introduction and Acknowledgements
    c. Summary of Retreat
II. Committee Reports
III. Consideration of Previous Meeting's Minutes
IV. CEO Report
V. Acknowledgement of Board Member Transitions
VI. Discussions, Deliberations and Official Actions
VII. Public Comments
VIII. Final Comments and Adjournment

Members of the public who would like to comment on the business of the 
Board may do so in writing or in person. Individuals may submit written 
comments to jmauk@cns.gov subject line: MAY 2013 CNCS BOARD MEETING by 
4:00 p.m. (ET) on May 10, 2013. Individuals attending the meeting in 
person who would like to comment will be asked to sign-in upon arrival. 
Comments are requested to be limited to 2 minutes.

REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS: The Corporation for National and Community 
Service provides reasonable accommodations to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. Anyone who needs an interpreter or 
other accommodation should notify Ida Green at igreen@cns.gov or 202-
606-6861 by 5 p.m. (ET) on May 10, 2013.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jenny Mauk, Special Assistant to 
the CEO, Corporation for National and Community Service, 1201 New York 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone: (202) 606-6615. Fax: (202) 
606-3460. TTY: (800) 833-3722. Email: jmauk@cns.gov.

    Dated: May 8, 2013.
Valerie Green,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-11270 Filed 5-8-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terence WATSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6390

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

Terence Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer E. Wells, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*144PER CURIAM:

Terence Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Watson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*