alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,425
<SECURITIES>                                    10,449
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,089
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    10
<PP&E>                                           3,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,172
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,264
<SALES>                                         30,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,818
<CGS>                                           14,473
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,481)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,199)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,349)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,349)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Timothy Randall WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
This is a draft document and does not represent a definitive view of the agency on the questions 

addressed.

This and other guidance documents are accessible on the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency 

& Renewable Energy web site at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/guidance/default.aspx?pid=2&spid=1.

Guidance Type: Test Procedures

Category: Residential Products

Product: Clothes Washers, Clothes Dryers, and Dishwashers

Guidance Version: DRAFT

Issued: October 7, 2014

Comment Period Ends: November 6, 2014

The following is a draft U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) guidance document regarding test procedures 

for residential clothes washers, clothes dryers, and dishwashers. This draft guidance document 

represents the Department’s interpretation of the existing regulations and is exempt from the notice 

and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A)) Nevertheless, the 

Department is accepting comments and suggestions from the public until November 6, 2014. Comments 

and suggestions should be provided in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or text file format by sending 

an email to MechOnOffSwitch2014GUID0046@ee.doe.gov . Include docket number EERE-2014-BTGUID-0046 in your correspondence. At the end of the comment period, this draft guidance document 

may be adopted, revised or withdrawn. 

Q: For a clothes washer, clothes dryer or dishwasher with a “hard” on/off switch or 

electromechanical dial that physically breaks the connection to the mains power supply, is the 

appliance considered to be in “off mode” when the switch or dial is in the “off” position?

A: Yes, when the switch or dial is in the “off” position, the appliance would be considered in “off mode”

as defined in appendices C1, D1, D2 and J2 of Subpart B to 10 CFR Part 430, as long as no standby or 

active mode functions are provided. Off mode is defined as a mode in which the product is connected 

to a mains power source and is not providing any active mode or standby function, and where the mode 

may persist for an indefinite period of time. In addition, an indicator that only shows the user that the 

product is in the off position is included within the classification of an off mode. Pursuant to this 

definition, an indicator light that illuminates to indicate that the switch or dial is in the off position is not 

considered such a standby or active mode function. The appliance would still be considered to be in off 

mode when such an indicator is active.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Engage, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
333-83245, No. 333-93151, No. 333-93153 and No. 333-32202 on Form S-8 of Engage,
Inc. of our report dated September 20, 2000, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Engage, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 31, 1999 and 2000,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
July 31, 2000, and of our report dated September 20, 2000 relating to the
consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the July 31,
2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Engage, Inc.


                                         /s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
October 30, 2000
•

^ 

# SPRIN G • Sout hCarolina '

V 7 

# SPRINGDAL E Tow nHal l • 291 5 Piat t

Spring s Roa d• Springdale , SouthCarolin a2917 0 Phon e 803-794-040 8 • Fa x 803-791-056 7 wivw . SpringdaleSC . com Mayo r Pa t G . Smit h Mayo r Pro-Te m Gu s Mano s Counci l Stev e O . Hallma n Nanc y S . Peter s J . KevinReele y Justo nLRicar d Jaco b R . Wilkerso n Administrato r Natali e A . McKelvey Augus t 23 , 201 0 Aloh a Le y Actin g Associat e Director , X-5 0 U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve , S E W86-31 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Subject : Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Gran t Applicatio n

Docke t OST-2010-012 4 Columbi a Metropolita n Airpor t - Columbia , S C C 3

> O m -

# -^ 3 -; m 

## o o ^ C O .

Dea rMs . Ley : Th e Tow n o f Springdale , Sout h Carolin a strongl ysupport s th e abov e reference d gran t applicatio n tha t wil l support ne wan d improve d ai rservic e fro m th e Columbi a Metropolita n Airport . Th e succes s o f ne wservic e fro m th e Columbi a Metropolita n Airpor t i s criticall yimportan t t o th e healt h an d growt h o f ou rregion s loca l economy . Th e Town o f Springdal e ha s authorize d a commitmen t o f$1,00 0 fo rth e purpos e o fassistin g th e Columbi a Metropolita n Airport i n obtainin g additiona l schedule d commercia l ai rservice . Th e viabilit yo f ai rservic e improvement s wil l provid e a significan t boos t t o economi cdevelopmen t i n ou rcommunit ythroug h improve d acces s fo rtourist s an d busines s travelers . W e ar e please d t o hav e th e opportunit yt o support thi s gran t application . 

### Sincerely , jlDcereiv. A Pa t G . Smit h Mayo r
Exhibit 3.4

                     AMENDMENT NUMBER 2
                           TO THE
                    1995 RESTATED BYLAWS
                             OF
                     RENTRAK CORPORATION

     WHEREAS, Section 3.2 of the 1995 Restated Bylaws of
Rentrak Corporation (the "Bylaws") provides that the
Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") shall be
comprised of between three and seven directors, with the
exact number of directors to be established by resolution of
the Board;

     WHEREAS, Article 11 of the Bylaws authorizes the Board
to amend the Bylaws, and the Board believes that it is
desirable and in the Company's best interests to amend
Section 3.2 of the Bylaws to increase the maximum number of
directors from seven to nine; and

     WHEREAS, on February 23, 1998, at a duly convened meeting
of the Board, the Board adopted a resolution amending
Section 3.2 as provided below.

     NOW THEREFORE, the first sentence of Section 3.2 of
Article 3 of the Bylaws is hereby amended in its entirety
and shall read as follows:

          The number of directors of the
          corporation shall be not less than three
          or more than nine, with the number of
          directors to be established by
          resolution of the Board of Directors.

The second paragraph of Section 3.2 of the Bylaws is
unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect.

     Dated as of this 23rd day of February, 1998.


                              /s/ F. Kim Cox

               F. Kim Cox, Executive Vice President,
                   Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Sandra WALKER, Appellant, v. DAVITA, INC., and Sedgwick CMS, Appellees.

No. 1D17-3791

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 118 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 29), 2022 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a 

ceremony to present Congressional Gold Medals to the 

United States Capitol Police and others who protected 

the Capitol on January 6, 2021. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HCON 118 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO 

2 PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDALS TO 

3 UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE AND OTH4 ERS WHO PROTECTED THE CAPITOL ON JAN5 UARY 6, 2021. 

6 The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used 

7 on December 6, 2022, for a ceremony to present Congres8 sional Gold Medals to the United States Capitol Police and 

9 others who protected the Capitol on January 6, 2021. 

10 Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried 

11 out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect 

12 of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 

By KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Deputy Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Brion Umidi, the Chief Financial Officer of Aros Corporation
(the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the Report). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                               
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date:November 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Brion Umidi               
|                       |  | Name: Brion Umidi             
|                       |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                  BESTNET COMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BestNet
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I Stanley L. Schloz, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/  Stanley L. Schloz
-----------------------------
     Stanley L. Schloz
     President

December 14, 2006
John Alexis CAPELLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3526

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, A. Bradley Gabbard, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: November 10, 2003                    /s/ A. Bradley Gabbard
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           A. Bradley Gabbard
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOHN DAVID: LEPRE, IN ESSE AND SUI JURIS, CLAIMANT IN LAW,

Petitioner

v.

MARGARET J. KRUPINSKI, IN HER

OFFICIAL AND PRIVATE CAPACITY AND

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, T/D/B/A UNIFIED JUDICIAL SYSTEM, A FOREIGN

CORPORATE JURISDICTION AND
VENUE,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 156 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of November , 2018, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Original Writ of Mandamus,” as amended, is

DENIED.
Joanne Perez BENDAVID, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Dan BENDAVID, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2244

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1409 

To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating 

the Fairness Doctrine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2021 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, Mr. 

PERRY, and Mr. NORMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from 

repromulgating the Fairness Doctrine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reassuring that the 

5 United States Has Wide And Scrupulous Rhetorical In6 sight to Garnish Honest Thought Act of 2021’’ or the 

7 ‘‘RUSH WAS RIGHT Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1409 IH

1 SEC. 2. FAIRNESS DOCTRINE PROHIBITED. 

2 Title III of the Communications Act of 1934 is 

3 amended by inserting after section 303 (47 U.S.C. 303) 

4 the following new section: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 303A. LIMITATION ON GENERAL POWERS: FAIRNESS 

6 DOCTRINE. 

7 ‘‘Notwithstanding section 303 or any other provision 

8 of this Act or any other Act authorizing the Commission 

9 to prescribe rules, regulations, policies, doctrines, stand10 ards, or other requirements, the Commission shall not 

11 have the authority to prescribe any rule, regulation, policy, 

12 doctrine, standard, or other requirement that has the pur13 pose or effect of reinstating or repromulgating (in whole 

14 or in part) the requirement that broadcasters present op15 posing viewpoints on controversial issues of public impor16 tance, commonly referred to as the ‘Fairness Doctrine’, 

17 as repealed in General Fairness Doctrine Obligations of 

18 Broadcast Licensees, 50 Fed. Reg. 35418 (1985).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Engage, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
333-83245, No. 333-93151, No. 333-93153, No. 333-32202, No. 333-93153 and No.
333-53752 on Form S-8 of Engage, Inc. of our report dated September 24, 2001,
except for Note 22, which is as of October 4, 2001 relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Engage, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 31, 2000 and 2001,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended July
31, 2001, and of our report dated September 24, 2001, relating to the
consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the July 31,
2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Engage, Inc.



Boston, Massachusetts
October 29, 2001
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

HUNTER ANTHONY BLACK

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2726 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 001303

- A

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed November 18, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County

, Mikaela Nix

- Walker , Judge.

Robert David Malove, of The Law Office of Robert David Malove , P.A.

, F ort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman

, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR2

Hunter Anthony Black appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion

to correct sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)

.

Based on the State’s proper confession of error and our independent review,

we reverse with directions to the trial court to reinstate Black’s initial sentence.

The trial court violated Black’s rights against double jeopardy when, on its

own initiative, it enhanced his sentence sixty days after imposing it. See

Ashley v. State , 850 So. 2d 1265, 1267 (Fla. 2003); Shepard v. State , 940

So. 2d 545, 548 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Black’ s presence is not required for

this ministerial act.

REVERSED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.

SASSO , TRAVER and NARDELLA , JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector L. Roman BAEZ, Jr., a.k.a. Tito, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-11926 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Date Filed: 11/30/2016

*747Roberta Josephina Bodnar, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Jesus M. Casas, Yolande G. Viaca-va, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Myers, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Hector L. Roman Baez, Jr., Pro Se

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Hector Baez Jr. appeals *pro se*the denial of his motion to correct errors in his presentence investigation report. *See*Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. The district court ruled that the elimination of criminal history points from a presentence report is “not a ‘clerical error’ -within the meaning of Rule 36.” We affirm.

The district court did not err by denying Baez’s motion. A district court may use Rule 36 to correct a clerical error in a judgment, Fed. R. Crim. P. 36, but the correction “may not be used to make a substantive alteration to a criminal sentence,” *United States v. Portillo,*363 F.3d 1161, 1164 (11th Cir. 2004). Baez moved to deduct points that had been assessed for four prior convictions on the grounds they “did not qualify under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(e)(l)” and “cause[d] [him] to have an upgrade security classification within the Federal Bureau of Prisons.” Because a reduction in criminal history points would alter Baez’s sentencing range, his motion does not request the type of “minor and mechanical” change allowed under Rule 36. *See id.*at 1165. Baez cannot raise a substantive challenge to the calculation of his sentence in a motion to correct a clerical error.

We AFFIRM the denial of Baez’s motion to correct a clerical error.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-17030) pertaining to the 1986 Stock Option Plan; in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-68474, No. 33-24122, No. 33-30716 and No.
333-17259) pertaining to the 1988 Stock Option Plan; in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59861) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan; in
the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-68476 and No. 333-71971)
pertaining to the Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors; and in the
Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No. 33-87948, No. 333-28139, No. 333-29171,
No. 333-45803 and No. 333-69317, and Form S-4 No. 33-06901) and in the related
Prospectuses of Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 1999
except for paragraph 13 of Note I and Notes H and L as to which the date is
September 3, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K/A Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Cincinnati, Ohio
September 10, 1999
Richard K. COLLINS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2539

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE Charles S. SULLIVAN, Jr.

CR-16-0230

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 24,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 Date: February 7, 2007/s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman, President, andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)February 7, 2007/s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithExecutive Vice President, andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)February 7, 2007