alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1478 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to enter into an 

agreement with the National Academy of Medicine under which the 

National Academy agrees to conduct a one-year study assessing the 

effectiveness of current vital statistics reporting and data sharing between 

State, local, Tribal, and Federal agencies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2021 

Mr. TAYLOR (for himself, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, and Mr. SCHRADER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

enter into an agreement with the National Academy of 

Medicine under which the National Academy agrees to 

conduct a one-year study assessing the effectiveness of 

current vital statistics reporting and data sharing between State, local, Tribal, and Federal agencies, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1478 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vital Standardization 

3 of Thoughtful Administrative Techniques and Statistics 

4 Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘Vital STATS Act of 2021’’. 

5 SEC. 2. STUDY ON EFFECTIVENESS OF VITAL STATISTICS 

6 REPORTING. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

8 Human Services shall enter into an agreement with the 

9 National Academy of Medicine under which the National 

10 Academy agrees to conduct a one-year study assessing the 

11 effectiveness of current vital statistics reporting and data 

12 sharing between State, local, Tribal, and Federal agencies 

13 and the degree to which there is divergence between State, 

14 local, Tribal, and Federal vital statistics reporting. 

15 (b) REPORT.—The agreement entered into under 

16 subsection (a) shall require the National Academy of Med17 icine to, not later 1 year after the date on which the agree18 ment is entered into, to submit to Congress a report con19 taining the findings of the study conducted pursuant to 

20 such subsection. Such report shall include recommenda21 tions with respect to— 

22 (1) coordination and standardization of State, 

23 local, Tribal, and Federal vital statistics reporting 

24 methods, including the efficiency, effectiveness, and 

25 transparency of such reporting; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1478 IH

1 (2) the feasibility of setting national standards 

2 for death reporting and collecting vital statistics. 

3 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

4 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

5 $1,000,000, to remain available until expended. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Senen FIGUEROA-LOPEZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-50384.

D.C. No. CR-03-00808-H.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2004.*

Decided May 14, 2004.

Mark R. Rehe, Shanna L. Dougherty, USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michelle Villasenor-Grant, Tracy B. Gatlin, Federal Public Defender, FDCA— Federal Defender’s of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BROWNING, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Senen Figueroa-Lopez appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm.

I

The government argues that we should dismiss Figueroa-Lopez’s appeal under the doctrines of invited error and judicial admissions. However, there is no basis in the record for precluding consideration of the merits. *See Am. Title Ins. Co. v. Lacelaw Corp.,*861 F.2d 224, 226 (9th Cir.1988); *United States v. Perez,*116 F.3d 840, 845 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc).

II

The Department of Homeland Security’s Reorganization Plan was not effective until after Figueroa-Lopez’s illegal reentry. 6 U.S.C. § 542; *see also Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 848 n. 1 (9th Cir.2003) (recognizing effective date of Plan). Consequently, the indictment was not deficient and there was nothing wrong with the plea colloquy.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.10


OGE Energy Corp.
Director Compensation
Compensation of non-management directors of OGE Energy Corp. ("OGE Energy") in 2018 included an annual retainer fee of $225,000, of which $100,000 was payable in cash in quarterly installments and $125,000 was deposited in the director's account under OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan and converted to 3,028 common stock units based on the closing price of OGE Energy's Common Stock on December 11, 2018. In 2018, the non-management directors did not receive additional compensation for attending Board or committee meetings but were instead paid a quarterly cash retainer that was increased from the previous year. The lead director received an additional $25,000 cash retainer in 2018. The chair of the Audit Committee received an additional $15,000 cash retainer in 2018. The chair of each of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees received an additional $12,500 annual cash retainer in 2018. Each member of the Audit Committee also received an additional annual retainer of $5,000.  These amounts represent the total fees paid to directors in their capacities as directors of OGE Energy and Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company in 2018. 


Under OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan, non-management directors may defer payment of all or part of their quarterly cash retainer fee, which deferred amounts in 2018 were credited to their account as of the quarterly scheduled payment date. Amounts credited to the accounts are assumed to be invested in one or more of the investment options permitted under OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan. In 2018, those investment options included an OGE Energy Common Stock fund, whose value was determined based on the stock price of OGE Energy's Common Stock. When an individual ceases to be a director of OGE Energy, all amounts credited under OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan are paid in cash in a lump sum or installments. In certain circumstances, participants may also be entitled to in-service withdrawals from OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan.


On December 4, 2018, the Compensation Committee met to consider director compensation. At that meeting, the Compensation Committee increased the annual equity retainer, noted above, credited on December 11, 2018, from $110,000 to $125,000.
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United St ates District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-2823

___________ Barbara Mrzlak Brundo, Ed.D., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Rev. Stephen Stillmunks, Registered * Agent, Christ the King Catholic School * [UNPUBLISHED] & Church; Laraine Conway, * Principal, Christ the King School; * Chris Segrell, Assistant Principal, * Christ the King School, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 10, 2010 Filed: March 19, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Barbara Brundo appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal and imposition of sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 in her employment-disc rimination suit. Defendants have filed a motion for damages and costs under Fed. R. App. P. 38.-2- We find that the district court properly dismissed Brundo’s complaint. See Goss v. City of Little Rock , 90 F.3d 306, 308 (8th Cir. 1996) (de novo review of dismissal for failure to state a claim); see also Bales v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 143 F.3d 1103, 1111 (8th Cir. 1998) (liability unde r Title VII borne by employers, not individuals); Birkback v. Marvel Lighting Corp. , 30 F.3d 507, 510 (4th Cir. 1994) (individuals are not subject to suit unde r ADEA); Billingsley v. BFM Liquor Mgmt. Inc. , 613 N.W.2d 478, 484 (Neb. 2000) (NFEPA is modeled on ADEA). We also hold that Brundo has not given this court any reason to find that the district court abused its discretion in imposing sanctions under Rule 11, or that the amount the district court awarded was unreasonable. SeeFed. R. Civ. P. 11(b), (c); Clark v. United Parcel Serv., Inc. , 460 F.3d 1004, 1008-11 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; describing Rule 11 procedures).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Because we have determined that Brundo’s appeal is wholly without merit, we grant defendants’ Rule 38 motion, and award damages and costs in the requested amount of $5,196. See 28 U.S.C. § 1912 (when judgment is affirmed, court may, in its discretion, award just damages and costs to prevailing party); Fed. R. App. P. 38 (if court finds appeal frivolous, it may award just damages and single or double costs to appellees); see also Newhouse v. McCormick & Co. , 130 F.3d 302, 305 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam order) (appeal is frivolous when result is obvious or when appellant’s argument is wholly without merit).

________________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 AND THE NOTES THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          57,482
<SECURITIES>                                   310,950
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               408,259
<PP&E>                                          79,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 812,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,313
<BONDS>                                        287,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                     453,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   812,705
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,067
<CGS>                                           21,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,931
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PREMARK
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S 1995 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS FILED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.  EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF
SFAS NO. 128.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                              <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                          19,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,700
<INVENTORY>                                    347,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               879,700
<PP&E>                                         939,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 514,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,961,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          603,100
<BONDS>                                        121,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     939,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,961,300
<SALES>                                      2,213,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,213,400
<CGS>                                        1,420,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,420,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (400)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             78,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                 158,700
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   237,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.78
        
        

</TABLE>
| 1.   | The      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended      December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);      and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:            |   | April 10, 2009                    |
|------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|  Signature: |   |  /s/      Terry Lee          |
|  Title:     |   |  Chief      ExecutiveOfficer |
Jose Dionicio CAQUIAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-136

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 3, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Lynn ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6562

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 17, 2017

Decided: August 22, 2017

Michael Lynn Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Lynn Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard *122by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record,and conclude that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. ,

*DISMISSED*
Nicholas FURNELLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3115

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 20, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
14







Consent
of Binsar Sirait



United
States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies
and Gentlemen:



I,
Binsar Sirait, engineer and SME Registered Member, hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name, and the inclusion in
the annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc. of the information reviewed and approved by me that is of a scientific or technical
nature contained in the Annual Information Form for the financial year ended December 31, 2016 regarding operations at the Rainy
River project under the heading " Mineral Properties – Rainy River Project, Canada – Mining Operations”.





Dated
this 30th day of March, 2017



Yours
truly,



|      | /s/
    Binsar Sirait    
|----- | -------------------------
|Name: | Binsar
    Sirait        
|      | SME
    Registered Member
|      | New
    Gold Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Argonaut Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mark E Watson III, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to the § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFIED this 1stday of March, 2007.



/s/ Mark E. Watson IIIMark E. Watson IIIPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,843
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          32,685
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   179
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,710
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        279,777
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,656
<DEPOSITS>                                     312,188
<SHORT-TERM>                                    22,215
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             28,595
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 395,656
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,795
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  838
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   556
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,189
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,024
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,032
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,157
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 141
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    578
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         578
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       445
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F1>
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,835
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,551
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       20
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,591<F1>
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,591<F1>
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>This information is not disclosed in the Form 10-Q.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Valassis Communications, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge and belief that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 8, 2006 |  | /s/ Robert L. Recchia  
|                        |  | Robert L. Recchia      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer



26