alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 1298 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1233 North 

Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Technical Sergeant Marshal Roberts 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL SERGEANT MARSHAL ROBERTS POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Technical Sergeant Marshal 

Roberts Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Technical Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1996
<CASH>                                          92,454  
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,674,704
<PP&E>                                       4,487,458
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,835,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,859,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,311,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,859,680
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,119,001     
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             156,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                229,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            229,944
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Victor Jerome BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2370

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 1, 2018

Victor Jerome Bell, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Due to Appellant's apparent abuse of the legal process by his repeated pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence, the Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. *See**State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999) (requiring that courts "first provide notice and an opportunity to respond before preventing [a] litigant from bringing further attacks on his or her conviction and sentence"). Appellant's response to the show cause order does not provide a legal basis to prohibit the imposition of sanctions.

Because Appellant's continued and repeated attacks on his judgment and sentence have become an abuse of the legal process, we hold that he is barred from future pro se filings in this Court concerning Escambia County Circuit Court case number 2012-CF-1842. The Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any future filings concerning this case unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. Appellant is warned that any filings that violate the terms of this opinion may result in a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.

Rowe, Ray, and Makar, JJ., concur.
Michael C. GRAY, Jr. v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-15-1144

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         46,101
<SECURITIES>                                        0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                 166,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                   46,828
<INVENTORY>                                         0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              286,098
<PP&E>                                        724,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                377,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,782,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         876,175
<BONDS>                                             0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                        43
<COMMON>                                      464,750
<OTHER-SE>                                 65,651,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,782,539
<SALES>                                       372,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              372,573
<CGS>                                               0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,076,844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (702,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (702,350)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                           0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                (702,350)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.022)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.022)
<FN>
<F1> Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line item on the
     Balance Sheet or Statement of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Timothy J. DAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3484

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018. Rehearing Denied March 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                        SED INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the annual report of SED International Holdings,
Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Levine, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SED
International Holdings, Inc.



                                       /s/ Michael Levine
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Michael Levine
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       Dated: November 27, 2002
Exhibit 32.1


                  BESTNET COMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BestNet
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert A. Blanchard, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                            /s/  Robert A. Blanchard
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Robert A. Blanchard
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

December 12, 2003
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 508
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 2 of 12 PAGEID #: 509
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 3 of 12 PAGEID #: 510
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 4 of 12 PAGEID #: 511
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 5 of 12 PAGEID #: 512
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 6 of 12 PAGEID #: 513
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 7 of 12 PAGEID #: 514
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 8 of 12 PAGEID #: 515
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 9 of 12 PAGEID #: 516
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 10 of 12 PAGEID #: 517
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 11 of 12 PAGEID #: 518
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 80 Filed: 02/13/19 Page: 12 of 12 PAGEID #: 519
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

- 0054

_________________ SH ANDOR S. BADARUDDIN,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. ST ATE OF MONTANA and the NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, HONORABLE MATTHEW CUFFE, Presiding,

Defendants and Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the opening brief, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 27 , 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serv e the opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 26 2022

05/26/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0054
#### Otis T. MADISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF the VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-6831

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 24, 2017

Decided: September 8, 2017

Otis T. Madison, Appellant Pro Se. Aaron Jennings Campbell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Otis T. Madison seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 6, 2016. The district court found on limited remand from this court that Madison handed his notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing on June 10, 2016, and, thus, that the notice of appeal was not timely filed under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1): We review this factual finding for clear error, *see Ray v. Clements,*700 F.3d 993, 1012 (7th Cir. 2012), and we discern no such error. Thus, Madison filed the notice of appeal, beyond the 30-day-appeal period.

Because Madison failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not'aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Jamie  B.  Coulter,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of Lone  Star
Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 6, 2005 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                             /S/ Jamie B. Coulter
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Jamie B. Coulter
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             October 17, 2005
```
FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS RE: F.J.

CASE NO.: SC16-830

Supreme Court of Florida.

MAY 7, 2018

Upon consideration of F.J.'s petition for review and the briefs filed in this case, as well as F.J.'s response to the order to show cause, it is ordered that the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation of the Florida Board of Bar Examiners is approved. F.J.'s petition is hereby denied, and F.J. shall not be admitted to The Florida Bar at this time. However, the Court disapproves the Florida Board of Bar Examiners' recommendation that F.J. be disqualified from reapplying for admission for a period of two years from April 1, 2016. F.J. shall be disqualified from reapplying for admission for a period of five years from May 7, 2018.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1298 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Technical Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1298 RFS

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL SERGEANT MARSHAL ROBERTS 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1233 North Cedar Street in 

5 Owasso, Oklahoma, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Technical Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Technical Sergeant 

12 Marshal Roberts Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Rolando ANDRADE, Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, and Shell Oil Company/ESIS WC Claims, Appellees.

No. 1D17-2221

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 18, 2014

t0611

Order 

Clerk

June 18, 2014

148298

MICHAEL CLUM,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148298

COA: 307357

Ingham CC: 10-000146-CL

JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

VINCE VILONA,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 5, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 2




TO




TERM NOTE




     This AMENDMENT NO. 2 (this “Amendment”) to the Term Note dated October 27, 2008, as amended on
January 12, 2009, in the original principal amount of Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) payable to
the order of Clinical Data, Inc. (“CLDA,” and such Term Note, as amended, referred to as the “Term
Note”) is made as of this 30th day of March, 2009 by and between Avalon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(“Avalon”) and CLDA.



     WHEREAS, Avalon and CLDA desire to amend the Term Note to extend the Maturity Date, as that
term is defined in Section 4 of the Term Note, from April 30, 2009 to May 31, 2009.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, in
the Term Note and in the Note Purchase Agreement, as that term is defined in Section 1 of the Term
Note, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:



     SECTION 1. Amendment to the Term Note.



     Section 4 of the Term Note is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it
with the following:




Maturity Date. All of the amounts due hereunder shall be due and payable on the
earlier to occur of May 31, 2009, or such earlier date as such maturity may be
accelerated pursuant to the terms hereof (the “Maturity Date”).



     SECTION 2. Full Force and Effect. The Term Note shall remain in full force and
effect, except as modified hereby.



     SECTION 3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by one or more of the parties
hereto on any number of separate counterparts, and all of said counterparts taken together shall be
deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.



     SECTION 4. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with and
governed by the laws of the State of New York, without regard to its principles of conflicts of
laws.



     SECTION 5. Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective upon the execution
and delivery hereof by Avalon and CLDA.



[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered
as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Clinical Data, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Caesar J. Belbel
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Caesar J. Belbel 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary 	 
	 
	 	Avalon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Kenneth C. Carter, Ph.D.
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Kenneth C. Carter, Ph.D. 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President & Chief Executive Officer
THE DISCOUNT WAREHOUSE, INC., Appellant, v. CIPHER INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-2228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 29, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Fw: comment extension for SO 2 NAAQS?
Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 02/10/2010 07:31 AM

Please docket

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D. Environmental Protection Specialist Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-7524 stewart.michael@epa.gov ----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/10/2010 07:31 AM -----

From: Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US
To: "Frey Betsy (DNREC)" <Elizabeth.Frey@state.de.us>
Date: 02/08/2010 01:38 PM Subject: Re: comment extension for SO2 NAAQS?

Hi Betsy,

I do not anticipate an extension to the comment period but it is our practice to look at comments submitted after the close of the comment period to the maximum extent practicable. We understand, of course, the problem created by the snow for DE and as long as comments are received as soon as practicable, hopefully no later than the end of this week, we anticipate considering them fully.

Thanks, Michael

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D. Environmental Protection Specialist Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-7524 stewart.michael@epa.gov

"Frey Betsy (DNREC)" 02/08/2010 11:03:26 AM Hello Michael, Due to the state of emergenc...

From: "Frey Betsy (DNREC)" <Elizabeth.Frey@state.de.us>
To: Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 02/08/2010 11:03 AM Subject: comment extension for SO2 NAAQS?

Hello Michael,

Due to the state of emergency in Delaware caused by the snowstorm, our main offices are closed and

we will not be able to submit the state’s comments on the SO2 NAAQS proposal by the deadline today.

Do you know if there will be an extension granted?

Thanks for your help,Betsy Frey

Betsy Frey
QA Coordinator

Air Quality Management

DE DAWM/DNREC

715 Grantham Lane

New Castle, DE 19720
Ph: 302

‐ 323

‐ 4542, Fax: 302

‐ 323

‐ 4598 betsy

. frey @ state

. de

. us