alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1018 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1018

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the differential 
                          wage payment credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2021

  Mr. Panetta (for himself and Mr. Wenstrup) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the differential 
                          wage payment credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reservist Pay Equity Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF EMPLOYER WAGE CREDIT FOR EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ACTIVE 
              DUTY MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    (a) Increase in Differential Wage Payment Credit.--Section 45P(a) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``20 
percent'' and inserting ``50 percent''.
    (b) Adjustment for Inflation.--Section 45P(b) of such Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Adjustment for inflation.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning after 2021, the $20,000 amount in paragraph (1) 
        shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, by substituting `calendar year 
                2020' for `calendar year 1996' in subparagraph (A)(ii) 
                thereof.
        If the amount as increased under the preceding sentence is not 
        a multiple of $100, such amount shall be rounded to the nearest 
        multiple of $100.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments made after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
11/09/2010 11:56 2022675075 OFFICE OF RULEMAKING PAGE 18 

OEPARTMENT OF 

1348 artwight Lane ' ^£1 OPERATIONS 

Sooth Lyon, MI 48178-8724 

i m NOV - 9 P |: l b 

October 26,2010 

Admmistrator J. Randolph Babbitt 

Room 1010 

•goo i'0 6^£N)i>€>JcC /\^t,S ^ 

Re: Support these changes to the FAA's Flight Time/Duly Time NPRM 

Dear Administrator Babbitt: 

As a US commercial pilot reviewing the FAA Notice of Proposed Rulemakiiig (NPRM) on Flight crew member 

Duty and Rest Requirements I am pleased that the majority of (he NPRM represents an improvement to current 

regulations and covers all commercial operations in the spirit of "One Level of Safety." However, fljere are some 

specific items that need to be changed in order to mitigate fatigue for the professional pilot. 

1) The flight time limit should not be increased 25% from 8 hours to 10 hours. 

2) The augmented (3 person) flight time limit should not be increased 25% from 12 to 15 hours. 

3) Rest requirements should be 10 hours domestic and 14 hour? international, 9 hours, reducible to 8 hours is not 

enough time to achieve restorative sleep, eat, and attend to personal hygiene between duty periods. 

4) Domestic augmentation should not be allowed. 

As a professional commercial aviator working at high speed in congested airspace, and through arduous weather 

conditions, I can tell you that fatigue mitigation is paramount to improving the safety of the travelling public. The 

NTSB has held fatigue on its "Most Wanted List" for thirty years because it is a problem that fli^t crews deal with 

on a daily basis. Thin FAA NPRM will go a long way to reducing fatigue and increasing safety if these items are 

addressed. 

Smcerely, 

Todd H Bourlier 

248^86-3447
William SWAIM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2415

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Mark Edward COTTMEYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5197

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### CYIOS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

2015-5152

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 8, 2017

Joshua B. Duvall, Matross Edwards, LLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Delisa Sanchez, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr„ Deborah A. Bynum; Mella-ny Alio, Office of the Chief Counsel, Unit*1017ed States Army Materiel Command Legal Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD; Evan Williams, Contract and Fiscal Law Division, United States Army Legal Services Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA

(Dyk, Clevenger, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 23.3



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 33-42259
pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 1986 Stock Option Plan, No. 33-93816 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, No. 33-93818 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan, No. 333-84657 pertaining to the CytRx
Corporation 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan and No. 333-68200 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan, No. 333-91068 and No. 333-93305 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation Employee Benefit Plan and to the Registration
Statements on From S-3 Nos. 33-93820, 333-39607, 333-44043, 333-48837, 333-45652, 333-33792, 333-68092, and 333-100947 of CytRx Corporation and in the related prospectuses of our report dated March 5, 2003, with respect to the financial statements
of Blizzard Genomics, Inc. included in the CytRx Corporation Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Atlanta, Georgia

March 25, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1 

 

Consent of Independent Auditors 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3, Nos. 333-58296 and 333-65776) andrelated prospectuses of Insight Communications Company, Inc. for the registration of up to $1 billion in aggregate offering price in various combinations of its Class A Common Stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants or subscription rightsand the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-57808) pertaining to the Insight Communications Company, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan of our reports dated February 25, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of InsightCommunications Company, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

 

/S/    ERNST& YOUNG LLP 

 

New York, New York 

March 25, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

       We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-46715, 33-50610, 33-50608, 33-50607, 333-01409,
33-31371 and 333-31369) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
Employee Stock Option Plans of Informix Corporation of our report dated March 2,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Informix Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1997.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
March 30, 1998
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-80301, 333-16205, 333-37138, 333-40276, 333-47033, 333-71151,
333-82752, 333-104968, 333-109317 and 333-131796) and Form S-3 (No. 333-103539)
of PAREXEL International Corporation of our reports dated September 6, 2006,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of PAREXEL
International Corporation, PAREXEL International Corporation's management
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of PAREXEL
International Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended June 30, 2006.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                        Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 6, 2006
Michael GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3953

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:18-mj-00232-CMV Doc #: 10 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 30
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:18-mj-00232-CMV Doc #: 10 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 31
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**I, Jack H. Brown, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 13, 2008        /s/Jack H. Brown  Jack H. Brown   Chairman of the Board, President,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
ULGX FDS for 1st quarter for 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                        198,522
<SECURITIES>                               35,266,730 
<RECEIVABLES>                                 752,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                   653,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           37,225,890
<PP&E>                                        468,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                445,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             40,982,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,147,678
<BONDS>                                             0  
<COMMON>                                       91,343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                 38,690,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               40,982,815
<SALES>                                       586,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              586,125
<CGS>                                         721,553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 721,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            2,175,011
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            2,310,439
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,789,685)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,789,685)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,789,685)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
John HELLER and Judith Heller, Appellants, v. TOWER HILL SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1345

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 12, 2018]

Richard M. Benrubi of Law Office of Richard M. Benrubi, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Jonathan S. Tannen and Scot Samis of Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, May and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            Section 906 Certification

The undersigned officer of MASSBANK Corp. (the "Company") hereby certifies that
the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be
deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


Date: March 24, 2003                          /s/ Reginald E. Cormier
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name: Reginald E. Cormier
                                              Title: Sr.V.P.,Treasurer & CFO
John W. SMITH a/k/a John Ward Smith III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3027

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Auditors 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3, No. 333-58296 and 333-65776) and related prospectuses of Insight CommunicationsCompany, Inc. for the registration of up to $1 billion in aggregate offering price in various combinations of its Class A Common Stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants or subscription rights and the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Nos.333-57808 and 333-107666) pertaining to the Insight Communications Company, Inc. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan of our report dated February 23, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Insight Communications Company, Inc. includedin this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

New York, New York 

March 1, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      31,371,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,477,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,021,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,071,000
<PP&E>                                      15,995,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,038,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,913,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,680,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       111,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,549,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,913,000
<SALES>                                      2,429,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,429,000
<CGS>                                        1,803,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,803,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,789,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (833,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (833,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (833,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

DANIEL JAMES DOMENICK 

 Respondent 

 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2243 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

Board File Nos. C4-14-374, C4-15-667, 

C4-15-846, C4-15-847, C4-15-906, 

C4-15-985, C4-15-990, and C4-16-35 

Attorney Registration No. 312682 

(Allegheny County) 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2016, upon consideration of the responses 

to a Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary 

suspension, the Rule is made absolute and it is provided that: 

 1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action 

by this Court; 

 2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217; 

 3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County shall 

enter such orders as may be necessary to fully protect the rights of Respondent’s 

clients or fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g); 

 4. All financial institutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall freeze 

such accounts pending further action; 

 5. Respondent shall confirm that he has provided the Office of Disciplinary 

Counsel with a list of the names and addresses of all clients and other entities he is 
currently representing or with respect to which he is a fiduciary, as well as the banks 

and account number in which the funds are currently maintained. Respondent shall 

further confirm that he has ceased accepting fee payments from clients who reside in 

jurisdictions where Respondent is not permitted to practice law. 

 Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order 

pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(6), and to request accelerated disposition of charges 

underlying this order pursuant to 208(f)(6), are specifically preserved. 

 This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to 

confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402. 

 Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Darren Jeffrey PICHON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2926

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.