alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Damonan Owens IRBY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6826

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 17, 2017

Decided: October 20, 2017

Damonan Owens Irby, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Damonan Owens Irby seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Irby has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *217materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2009 of America’s Car-Mart, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, William H. Henderson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Jeffrey A. Williams, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify in our capacities as officers of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 By:           \s\ William H. Henderson
 William H. Henderson
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 July 14, 2009
 
 
 By:           \s\ Jeffrey A. Williams
 Jeffrey A. Williams
 Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
 July 14, 2009
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00880-CV

Jose C. LOPEZ and Georgia Rodriguez,

Appellants

v.

WALTER MORTGAGE COMPANY LLC, et al.,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-03-48902-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE MARION

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellants.

SIGNED February 5, 2014.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
EX PARTE Daniel Scott BALLARD, Jr.

CR-16-0414

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2 – CFO Certification**

 

**HEARTLAND, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Heartland, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-2 for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Jerry Gruenbaum

Jerry Gruenbaum

Chief Financial Officer,

Secretary and Director

 

August 11, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heartland, Inc., and will be retained by Heartland, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1445 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from changing the names of certain 

memorials or move any statues related to certain wars, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Mr. CARL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from changing 

the names of certain memorials or move any statues 

related to certain wars, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Heritage 

5 Protection Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CHANGING NAMES AND MOVING 

7 STATUES. 

8 The Secretary of the Interior shall not— 

9 (1) change the name of or alter in any way— 

10 (A) the Lincoln Memorial; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1445 IH

1 (B) the Jefferson Memorial; 

2 (C) the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memo3 rial; 

4 (D) the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial; 

5 (E) the Theodore Roosevelt Island; or 

6 (F) the Washington Monument; or 

7 (2) move, or alter in any way, any statue lo8 cated on Federal land related to— 

9 (A) the War of 1812; 

10 (B) the Civil War; or 

11 (C) the Revolutionary War. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

217 CA 12-00964 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

TODD R. GREENERT, PLAINTIFF,

V ORDER
SALES ASSOCIATES OF WNY, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

------------------------------------- SALES ASSOCIATES OF WNY, LLC, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V
EDWARD H. DAVIS, JR., KATERI M. DAVIS AND JEFFREY PILGER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

AUGELLO & MATTELIANO, LLP, BUFFALO (JOSEPH A. MATTELIANO OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
WALSH ROBERTS & GRACE, BUFFALO (KEITH N. BOND OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS EDWARD H. DAVIS, JR. AND KATERI M. DAVIS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered October 3, 2011. The order, among other things, granted the motion of third-party defendants Edward H. Davis, Jr. and Kateri M. Davis for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint of third-party plaintiff Sales Associates of WNY, LLC, against them. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation discontinuing appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 16, 2013, It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
All concur except M ARTOCHE , J., who is not participating.

Entered: November 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Consent of Holger Krutzelmann
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Cerro San Pedro Mine, San Luis Potosí, Mexico” dated February 16, 2010 and amended March 22, 2010, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2013, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 28th day of March, 2014
 
 
 "Holger Krutzelmann"Name:
Holger Krutzelmann, P. EngTitle:
Principal Metallurgist
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT FEBRUARY 28, 1997, THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28,
1997 AND THE UNAUDITED NOTES THERETO FOR PLATINIUM ENTERTAINMENT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                         139,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,347,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,528,155
<INVENTORY>                                  5,003,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,387,327<F1>
<PP&E>                                       2,689,510
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,441,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,090,545<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       42,304,812
<BONDS>                                      5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,151
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,780,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,090,545
<SALES>                                     10,812,681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,714,037
<CGS>                                        3,851,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,313,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,340,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             302,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,012,607)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,012,607)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,012,607)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES GROSS ARTIST ADVANCES OF $2,863,565.
<F2>INCLUDES GROSS ARTIST ADVANCES OF $15,100,749, LESS AN ALLOWANCE FOR
UNRECOUPABLE ARTIST ADVANCES OF $8,312,230.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert D. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-1786

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

Robert D. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah A. Marquardt, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert D. Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort *782Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. United States, No. 1:15-cv-02181-RDB (D. Md. May 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
TT OF INDIAN RIVER, INC., d/b/a Mercedes Benz of Melbourne and James C. Dorman, Appellants, v. Heidi FORTSON, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-0279

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 9, 2018

Richard A. Sherman, Sr. and James W. Sherman, of the Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Chris Killer and Todd Bohnenstiehl, of the Law Offices of J. Christopher Norris, Orlando, for Appellants.

Mark S. Roman and Morgan L. Gaynor, of Roman & Gaynor, Clearwater, Douglas R. Beam, of Douglas R. Beam, P.A., Melbourne, and Celene H. Humphries and Thomas J. Seider, of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa, for Appellee.

*ON CONFESSION OF ERROR*

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Heidi Fortson's Confession of Error, we reverse the Final Judgment for Costs and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1452 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to publish the formula 

the Secretary uses to determine the allocation of COVID–19 vaccines, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Mr. CRENSHAW (for himself, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. JACKSON, and 

Mr. WEBER of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

publish the formula the Secretary uses to determine the 

allocation of COVID–19 vaccines, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PUBLICATION OF VACCINE DISTRIBUTION FOR4 MULA. 

5 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall— 

6 (1) publish the formula the Secretary uses to 

7 determine the allocation of COVID–19 vaccines to 

8 States, localities, the Department of Defense, the 

9 Department of Veterans Affairs, the Indian Health 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1452 IH

1 Service, the Department of Homeland Security, and 

2 other Federal agencies, as appropriate; and 

3 (2) in publishing such formula, include the 

4 sources of data used for determining such formula. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Fuller *v.*Terrill.

5-1094

295 S. W. 2d 625

Opinion delivered November 26, 1956.

*J. B. Milham,*for appellant.

*F. 0. Butt,*for appellee.

Sam RobiNSON, Associate Justice.

This suit was filed by Billy and Marian Terrill to confirm their title to Lot 8, Block 168, Riley and Armstrong Survey, in the City of Eureka Springs, Arkansas. The appellant, C. A. Fuller, filed an intervention, claiming to be the owner. The issue is whether the Terrills have acquired title to the property by a deed from the State, coupled with the payment of taxes for more than seven consecutive years. The land is unimproved and uninelosed. Ark. Stats. § 37-102 provides: “Uninproved (unimproved) and uninclosed land shall be deemed and held to be in possession of the person who pays the taxes thereon if he have color of title thereto, but no person shall be entitled to invoke the benefit of this act (section) unless he and those under whom he claims shall have paid such taxes for at least seven (7) years in succession, and not less than three (3) of such payments must be made subsequent to the passage of this act.”

The problem is whether the deed from the State to the Terrills constitutes color of title. If the deed does carry color of title, then the Terrills must prevail, there being no dispute about their having paid the taxes for more than the seven year period.

Lot 8 was conveyed to Fuller by the Crescent Hotel Company in 1925, and, in 1929, he got another deed to an interest in the property from A. G. Ingalls and his wife, Lelia Ingalls. In the year 1947 the County Clerk *1041of Carroll County certified that Lot 8 had been omitted by mistake from the list of property certified to the State in 1935 for non-payment of the 1931 taxes. Subsequently, the State Land Commissioner deeded the lot to the Terrills. The record is convincing that the taxes were paid for the year 1931 and that the property should not have been certified to the State as being delinquent for that year. In the circumstances shown here, the deed from the State Land Commissioner to the Terrills is void. But, even though it is void the question is, does it carry color of title; and we have held repeatedly that a void deed from the State Land Commissioner constitutes color of title. *Cayce*v. *Nordin, Trustee,*221 Ark. 383, 253 S. W. 2d 338, citing *Culver*v. *Gillian,*160 Ark. 397, 254 S. W. 681; *Bradbury*v. *Dumond,*80 Ark. 82, 96 S. W. 390; 11 L. R. A., N. S. 772; *McKewen*v. *Allen,*80 Ark. 181, 96 S. W. 392; *Brandon*v. *Parker,*124 Ark. 379, 187 S. W. 312; *Terry*v. *Drainage District No.*6, *Miller Co.,*206 Ark. 940, 178 S. W. 2d 857; and *Skelly Oil Co.*v. *Johnson,*209 Ark. 1107, 194 S. W. 2d 425.

The appellees have color of title even though their deed from the State is void, and, by the payment of taxes on wild and unimproved land for seven years under color of title, they acquired a valid title. Mr. Fuller has lost the lot by the law of adverse possession.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 4.1


 


		CAPELOGIC INCORPORATED

Providing Technology Solutions for Financial Services 


1 Windhaven Court, Monroe
Twp, NJ 08831 


Telephone: (609) 448-7930 Fax:
(973) 206-9430 


Web: www.capelogic.com



 


February 22, 2019


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.


8100 E. 22nd St. North, Building 800


Suite 102


Wichita, KS 67226


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 1913 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-227345 for the above captioned Fund and acknowledge that Capelogic, Inc. is currently acting
as the independent pricing agent for the Fund. Subsequently, we hereby consent to the reference of Capelogic, Inc. as independent
pricing agent.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	Capelogic, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ SALMAN AHMAD
	 	 	Salman Ahmad
	 	 	Treasurer
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Michael O'Donnell
                                        -------------------------------------
                  June 27, 2003         Michael O'Donnell
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882973
<NAME> CHESTNUT PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,360,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,661,935
<PP&E>                                         672,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,465,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,966,533
<BONDS>                                     13,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,465,861
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,126,139
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,781,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (311,609)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,544
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,544
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Caylon Johnson v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00833-CR; 01-13-00834-CR

Trial court case number: 1338720, 1338721

Trial court: 174th District Court of Harris County

On March 10, 2015, this case was abated and remanded to the trial court to determine 

whether appellant wished to prosecute these appeals and, if so, whether appellant’s retained 

counsel has abandoned the appeals. On April 24, 2015, the trial court held a hearing on our 

abatement order. The reporter’s record of the abatement hearing indicates that appellant and his 

counsel stated on the record in open court that appellant no longer wishes to prosecute these 

appeals. Accordingly, on May 5, 2015, the trial court entered its Findings of Fact and 

Conclusions of Law finding that appellant no longer desires to prosecute the appeals.

We REINSTATE these cases on the Court’s active docket. The cases will be set for 

submission and considered without briefs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4) (“If the trial court has 

found that the appellant no longer desires to prosecute the appeal . . . the appellate court may 

consider the appeal without briefs, as justice may require.” ); see also Ayala v. State, No. 01-13-

00393-CR, 2015 WL 161788, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 13, 2015, no pet.); 

Compian v. State, No. 01-08-00034-CR, 2010 WL 3220644, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

Dist.] Aug. 12, 2010, no pet.).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually 

Date: June 11, 2015
Pedro GONZALEZ, DOC #R88320, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3426

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.