alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the matter of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

# RECEIVED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

## AUG - 62012 WASHINGTON, D.C. 

## HEARING DOCKET

FAA Docket No. UNASSIGNED FDMS No. FAA-2012-0470**j··~~.,** Case No. 2011WP910359 PREMIERJETS, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) Law Judge Goodwin t
..**-o~.J**

### ------------------------~) COMPLAINANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT c:) .r: Pursuant to the Procedural Order, dated June 11, 2012, and in accordance with 14 C.P.R. § 13.215, Complainant hereby withdraws its Complaint in this matter; all parties having settled all pending issues.

Date: July 27, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

# ~A~ Michael F. McKinley Senior Attorney Enforcement Division Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Telephone: (202) 267-7100 Facsimile: (202) 267-5106CERTIFICATE 

### OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I delivered by U.S. Certified Mail the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaint in In the Matter of Premier Jets, Inc, FAA Docket No. Unassigned, Case No. 2011WP910359, to: Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Ave., S.W. Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 Washington, D.C. 20591 ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

In addition, I hereby certify that I served a copy ofthe same by First Class Mail, addressed to the following:

Name: Roger B. Kelsay President Premier Jets, Inc. 2140 N.E. 25th Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97124

# @_7x~
Date:

# _7-+-/;---=-7--J.....-f~~cJ---­ / I '

2
J

~~ -tE0 STq r

~ S 4 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY o 

### ~~~ /J Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 2 

### ~ il{ff a

0 F,

~ IqC ~ O
I ~ G ~~ 

## JUL 3 0 20 ~~

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION 

### Mr. J.R. Stroble Director, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221
Dear Mr. Stroble: We received your letter dated July 29, 2013, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 

### (EPA's) concurrence on the draft expansion memo to the certification of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The purpose of the memo is to expand the site's certification to add the Mobile In Situ Object Counting System Large Container Counter (MILCC), which EPA approved on July 22,2013. Based on our review, we concur with CBFO's draft expansion memo which will allow LANLCCP to characterize waste using the MILCC. The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH and RH TRU waste are appropriately included in Attachment 4 of the draft expansion memo. The waste characterization equipment, procedures and processes included in the memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site. Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft expansion memo for LANL-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462. Sincerely,



### Edward Feltcorn Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### cc: (Electronic Distribution)

Joe Franco, CBFO Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP Site Documents, CBFO Tom Peake, EPA Raymond Lee, EPA
Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 93 Filed: 01/24/19 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: 1480

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 93 Filed: 01/24/19 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: 1481
David LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3647

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 26, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Jamie  B.  Coulter,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of Lone  Star
Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 21, 2006 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                      /s/ Jamie B. Coulter
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Jamie B. Coulter
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      May 1, 2006
```
#### Milton N. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6532

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

Milton N. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Elizabeth Baumgartner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee,

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Milton N. Williams seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.* The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability.will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that *137the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C, § 636(c) (2012).
msci-ex10171_944.htm



 

Exhibit 10.171

 

AMD_00241686.0

 

THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) dated as of February 19, 2018 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) is made to the Previous Amendment (as defined below) by and between MSCI Inc. (formerly known as Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc.) (“MSCI”) and BlackRock Fund Advisors, a California corporation (as successor to Barclays Global Investors, N.A.) (“Licensee”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Previous Amendment.

WHEREAS, MSCI and Licensee entered into the Amendment (internal MSCI reference number: AMD_00389) dated August 23, 2011 (the “Previous Amendment”), which amends the Index License Agreement for Funds (internal MSCI reference number: IXF_00040) dated as of March 18, 2000 (the “Agreement”) by and between MSCI and Licensee; and

WHEREAS, on a date which is expected to occur on or about June 1, 2018 (the “Conversion Date”), Licensee and MSCI wish to replace one MSCI index with a different MSCI index as the basis of iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, each of MSCI and Licensee hereby agree to amend the Previous Amendment as follows:


	
1.
	
Commencing on the Conversion Date, Section 1 of the Previous Amendment is hereby amended so that the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index shall be deleted and replaced with the following index:  “MSCI EM Asia Custom Capped Index.”





	
2.
	
This Amendment amends and operates in conjunction with the Previous Amendment.  This Amendment, the Previous Amendment and the Agreement constitute the complete and exclusive statement of the agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede in full all prior proposals and understandings, oral or written, relating to such subject matter.  To the extent that the terms of this Amendment conflict with the terms of the Previous Amendment or the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control.





	
3.
	
This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict or choice of laws principles.





	
4.
	
This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, which taken together, shall constitute one Amendment and each party hereto may execute this Amendment by signing such counterpart; provided that no party shall be bound hereby until the Amendment has been executed and delivered by all parties hereto. A facsimile or PDF signature of either party to this Amendment shall be deemed an original signature of such party and shall manifest such party’s intention to be bound by this Amendment.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Amendment Effective Date set forth above.


	
MSCI Inc.
	
 
	
BlackRock Fund Advisors

	
By  /s/ Alex Gil
	
 
	
By  /s/ Ruth Weiss

	
Name  Alex Gil
	
 
	
Name  Ruth Weiss

	
Title Executive Director
	
 
	
Title  Managing Director




 

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        2,630,453
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          2,632,904
<EQUITIES>                                       9,250
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,639,788
<CASH>                                       8,296,943
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         484,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,033,196
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              3,391,950
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          1,464,800
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              2,880,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,275
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,476,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,033,196
<PREMIUMS>                                  20,763,439
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            513,913
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (2,713)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 358,433
<BENEFITS>                                  12,212,694
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    319,775
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         8,607,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                493,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                   392,748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,320
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               4,351,500
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         12,939,875
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            (727,181)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           9,875,609
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             3,296,635
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              3,391,950
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Darren M. FRAZIER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5024

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
T.P., Father of A.P. and T.P., Children, Appellant, v. A.D., Mother of A.P. and T.P., Children, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3771

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 42 7- CV AJ R O R E ALE S T AT E I NVE S T M E NT S , L L C AP P E L L ANT V . TO W N O F L I TTLE EL M A PPELL EE

----- ----- FR O M PROBATE COU RT OF DENTON CO UN TY

----- ----- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W e h a v e c o n s id e r e d a p p e lla n t ’s “ U n o p p o s e d M o t io n T o D is m is s .” It is t he cou r t ’ s opi ni on t hatt he m ot i on shou l d be gr ant ed; t her ef or e, w e di sm i ss t he a p p e a l . S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .1 (a )(1 ), 4 3 .2 (f). C os t s of t he app ea l sh al l be pai d by app el l ant , f or w hi ch l et execut i on i s s u e . S eeTe x. R. App . P. 43. 4. P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: L I V I N G STO N , D A U PH I N O T, an d GA RD N ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: Aug us t13, 2009
Consent of Dennis Bergen
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the New Afton Project, British Columbia, Canada” dated December 31, 2009, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2013, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 28th day of March, 2014
 
 
 “Dennis Bergen”Name:
Dennis Bergen, P. Eng.Title:
Associate Principal Mining Engineer
#### Theodore SULLIVAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. W. YOUNCE, Former Warden, sued in their individual and official capacities; Pearson, Warden, sued in their individual and official capacities; Harrison, Lt. Invs., sued in their individual and official capacities; Medilia, Sgt., sued in their individual and offi*191cial capacities; Wendy S. Hobbs, Eastern Regional Administrator, sue in her individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6340

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 31, 2017

Decided: September 11, 2017

Theodore Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Sullivan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Sullivan v. Younce,*No. 3:15-cv-00010-REP-RCY, 2017 WL 655176 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Belkis SOSA, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2234

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

TH\ei^h>^^H^^ ^ I ^^i^^c^Oj^^^f^^C^^i ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^

Wit hrespec t

t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.0.12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] ;

iitia i ap i Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio nan d Regulator y Affair s (OIRA) . N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) after i t wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio ni s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t for th e submissio no f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGAO( § 801 ) hav e bee nme t i naccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line) ;

Thi s documen t

i s no t afinal rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . Th e documen t

ha s bee nsubmitte dt o C-5 0 for transmissio nt o Congres s an dGAO . Signa l ur i Nam e Title/Offic e Dat e
Armando RIVAS, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, as trustee FOR The CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF THE CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-33CB, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-33CB, Luz C. Rivas, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for Countrywide Bank, FSB, Estates of Boynton Waters West Homeowners' Association, Inc., Tenant, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3824

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 13, 2018]

Armando Rivas, Boynton Beach, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Adam G. Schwartz of Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellee The Bank of New York Mellon.

Per Curiam.

*335Affirmed. The appellant may not attack the underlying foreclosure judgment through appeal of an order granting possession of the property after sale. *See* *Dalrymple, Sr. v. Wells Fargo Bank* , *N.A.* , 237 So.3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). Appellant was not denied his right of redemption because the right of redemption exists only until the issuance of the certificate of sale, which took place, and certificate of title issued. *See* § 45.0315, Fla. Stat. (2017). Additionally, there was no procedural error with issuance of the writ of possession because it was issued after denial of appellant's objection to the sale and after issuance of the certificate of title. *See* *Caplan v. Neumann* , 699 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding a writ of possession must be issued after resolution of a timely objection to the sale).

Warner, Taylor and Levine, JJ., concur.
Joseph RYALS, Appellant, v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and Florida League of Cities, Appellees.

No. 1D17-2395

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date of Accident: April 30, 2014 March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
TEST DATA REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

P-10-0231

Post-Focus Draft Revision 4 6/8/2011

ENGINEER: Avcin \ CLM \ JAS \ EV \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 22500 

Revision Notes/Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER:

USE: Electrical insulating varnish for motors, generators, transformers.

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes LABEL: No

Gen Eqpt: Exhaust ventilation. Use in a well ventilated area. Local mechanical ventilation. // Rubber gloves. 

Neoprene gloves. // Splash goggles. Face shield.

Respirator: Use approved NIOSH respiratory protection if TLV exceeded, or overexposure is likely.

Health Effects: Irritation of the mouth, throat, and stomach. May cause pulmonary edema. // May cause an allergic 

skin reaction. Contains a component which is a known or suspected skin sensitizer. // May cause mild eye irritation.

TLV/PEL: - none established

CRSS: (3/8/2010):

Chemical Name:

S-H2O: 0.0528 g/L @ 

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ 

MW: %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use

SAT (concerns): (3/9/2010):

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: 

Migration to groundwater: Moderate

PBT rating: P2 B1 T1 -

Health: 1

Eco: 2, Water (All releases to water with a CC = 52 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 REC:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No (0 criteria met)

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
P-10-0231

Use: Electrical insulating varnish

Number of Sites/Location: 

 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources 

to the same medium. 

High End: 

to: 

from: 

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

kg/yr - 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
P-10-0231

Manufacturing/Formulation

Number of Sites/Location: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Conservative: 

to: 

from: 

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

kg/yr - 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
ex10-8.htm


    


     

    Exhibit 10.8

     

     

    Current Director Fee
Arrangements

     

     

    Directors of the Company receive no fees
for service on the Board of Directors of MainStreet Financial Corporation (the
Company). Directors of the Company, except for those that also are executive
officers of the Bank, receive compensation for service on the Board of Directors
of MainStreet Savings Bank, FSB (the Bank).  During 2009, all
non-employee directors of the Bank will receive a $300 monthly retainer plus
$600 for each board meeting attended. All non-employee directors of the Bank
will also receive $200 for each committee meeting attended in excess of 12
meetings during the year. Director Fuhr, as Chairman, will receive an additional
$1,800 annual fee, paid quarterly. He also will receive fees for the
construction appraisals he conducts for the Bank. He is paid $50 when the
property is within 10 miles from the Bank, $75 when property is from 11 to 25
miles from the Bank and $100 when the property is more than 25 miles from the
Bank. Additionally he will receive a mileage rate of 58.5 cents per mile driven
for these services. The employee directors of the Company will receive no
separate compensation for Board service.