alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creator Capital Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Deborah Fortescue-Merrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/
STATE of Louisiana v. Frank DIAZ

NO. 2017-KO-1722

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report of
SED International Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Diamond, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request. Dated: October 29, 2007 /s/ JEAN DIAMONDJean DiamondChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2003

HENRI JEAN

- BAPTISTE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; MERITECH MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY; STONE TITLE; JOHN BURSON, Esquire , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv
- 02829

- CCB )

Submitted : January 23, 2019 Decided: February 11, 2019

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Henri Jean

- Baptiste, Appellant Pro Se. Jamar Raphael Brown, Gerard J. Gaeng, ROSENBERG, MARTIN & GREENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland , for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Henri Jean

- Baptiste appeals the district court’s order marginal order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) motion to reopen his lawsuit challenging the foreclo sure on his residential property. After removal to federal court, Jean

- Baptiste’s lawsuit was
remanded to state court in January 201 5 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction . T he
district court’s remand order is no t reviewable on appeal

. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d) (2012). We therefore affirm the marginal order denying the motion to reopen

. See Jean

Baptiste v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. , No. 8:13

- cv
- 02829

- CCB (D. Md., filed Aug. 17, 2018 & entered Aug. 20, 2018). We grant leave to proceed in form a pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRM ED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         593,842
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,178,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,204,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,103
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,171,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,204,339
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               280,134
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                149,220
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   149,220
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00


</TABLE>
Chad Johnathan GARNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1106

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Displ. (L) EPA Data

1.8 22.62167 SUMMARY OUTPUT

1.8 22.52333

1.8 22.89667 Regression Statistics

1.9 26.86333 Multiple R 0.299585

1.9 22.09833 R Square 0.089751

1.9 27.32167 Adjusted R Square 0.07458

2.3 18.98 Standard Error 5.553363

2.3 25.36833 Observations 62

2.4 24.57667

2.4 20.45333 ANOVA

2.4 22.54667 df SS MS F Significance F

2.5 20.21333 Regression 1 182.4498 182.4498 5.91604 0.018004

2.5 26.84667 Residual 60 1850.391 30.83985

3 23.58 Total 61 2032.84

3 23.27833

3 23.85167 CoefficientsStandard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%

3 23.57667 Intercept 26.88534 2.386248 11.26678 1.93E-16 22.11213 31.65855 22.11213 31.65855

3 20.50833 X Variable 1 -1.58494 0.651626 -2.43229 0.018004 -2.88839 -0.2815 -2.88839 -0.2815

3 18.06

3 21.84167

3 12.835

3 17.73

3 13.66

3 28.44667

3 22.23167

3.2 13.66167

3.2 14.04333

3.2 18.65667

3.2 27.64

3.2 22.20167

3.5 19.91

3.5 30.40667

3.5 22.24
3.5 19.58167

3.5 21.24333

3.5 21.735

3.6 21.52167

3.6 23.16833

3.6 22.88667

3.7 21.17

3.7 20.21667

3.7 18.64333

3.7 13.4

3.7 16.915

3.7 16.85167

3.8 38.67833

3.8 38.21833

3.8 35.33667

4 17.31

4 22.4

4 20.01333

4.2 20.58333

5.3 18.36

5.3 16.88333

5.3 16.39167

5.3 16.43667

5.4 15.6

5.4 15.42

5.4 33.43167

6 13.32167

6 12.09833

6 13.63 year make modela/c technologies

USCAR data: 1.4 19.4 GM A EVDC, reduced reheat

2.0 22.4 Ford A reduced reheat

2.0 20.0 Ford B reduced reheat

2.4 28.0 Chrysler C LPM blower, evaporator temp & system pressure control

2.4 18.3 GM B EVDC, reduced reheat

3.5 12.0 Ford C reduced reheat
3.6 24.0 Chrysler

B LPM blower, evaporator temp & system pressure control

3.6 16.0 GMC EVDC, reduced reheat

5.7 26.0 ChryslerA LPM blower, evaporator temp & system pressure control
Upper 95.0%


15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Test Results_

A/C

C

O2 Rate (g/min)

FRM 

0

5

10

15

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0

Test Results_

A/C

C

O2 Rate (g/min)

Engine Displacement (L)

EPA Data OEM Data Linear (New Threshold)

14.9 g/min Idle Test Threshold (for 

full credit value in 2012 rule)

FRM 

Threshold
Justin D. SUTTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Lois Navarrot 621 Capitol Mall, 18 '1, Floor 

Inava rrotl!c1!downeybra nd. com Sacramento, CA 95814 

916/520-5337 Direct 916/444- 1000 Main 

916/520-5737 Fax 916/444-2100 Fax 

downeybrand.com 

October 16, 2009 

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Shirley Rivera (AIR-3) 

U.S. EPA Region 975 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

Phone: (415) 972-3966 

Re:	 Prevention of Significant Deterioration Pennit for the Avenal Energy Project 

Client-Matter No. 39011.00001 

Dear Shirley: 

On October 14,2009, Avenal Power Center, LLC ("Avenal Power") submitted two binders of 

documents in support of the draft Prevention of Significant Deterioration pennit. In these 

binders, Document G, entitled "Supplemental Evaluation of Best Available Control 

Technology," contained a typographical error on page 14. On that page, the heading reading 

"NOx Limit" should instead read "CO Limit.'· Enclosed is a corrected version of page 14 and a 

CD with the corrected version to replace the previous version sent on October 14. If! can 

provide any further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me. 

Very truly yours, 

)?!:yAr:~ Lois Navarrot 

Assistant to Jane E. Luckhardt 

:In 

1035412 I 
TABLE 2 

Recent CO BACT Determinations for Combustion Turbines/HRSGs 

Averaging 

CO Limit Period Control Method 

Facility District/State (ppmca) (hours) Used Date Permit Issued Source 

Russell City Energy Center BAAQMD 4.0 3 oxidation catalyst December 2008 BAAQMD website 

Colusa Generating Station EPA Region 9 3.0 3 oxidation catalyst May 2008 EPAAQIA 

Blythe Energy LLC (Blythe lI)b MDAQMD 4.0 3 oxidation catalyst April 2007 PSD permit 

San Joaquin Valley Energy Center EPA Region 9 4.0 1 oxidation catalyst August 2006 PSD permit -~-­

Magnolia Power Project SCAQMD 2.0 1 oxidation catalyst February 2004 SCAQMD website 

Vernon City Power & Light SCAQMD 2.0 3 oxidation catalyst February 2004 SCAQMD website 

PSO Southwestern Power Plant Oklahoma 25 -­ oxidation catalyst February 2007 EPA RBLC -­

Rocky Mountain Energy Center Colorado 3.0 -­ oxidation catalyst May 2006 EPA RBLC 

Sierra Pacific Power Company Nevada 3.5 3 oxidation catalyst August 2005 EPA RBLC --

Wanapa Energy CenterC Oregon 2.0 3 oxidation catalyst August 2005 EPA RBLC 

Crescent City Power, LLC Louisiana 4.0c annual oxidation catalyst June 2005 EPA RBLC 

Berrien Energy, LLC Michigan 2.0 3 oxidation catalyst April 2005 EPARBLC 

Turner Energy Centerd Oregon 2.0/3.0 1 oxidation catalyst January 2005 EPA RBLC -­

Notes: 

a. parts per million by volume, dry @ 15% 02 

b. Construction on hold. 

c. Separate CO limit set for duct burners; this limit is for turbines only. 

d. Not built. 

-14­
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02627]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Audit and Financial Management Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of Audit and Financial Management Advisory 
Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act and its 
implementing regulations, SBA is issuing this notice to announce the 
renewal of its Audit and Financial Management Advisory Committee. This 
advisory committee is being renewed to provide advice and 
recommendations to SBA on government accounting and performance issues 
impacting the agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the Audit and 
Financial Management Advisory Committee may be directed to Andrienne 
Johnson, Office of the Administrator, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bdaf5ffe9f2fef5f5feb5d1f4f3f5e8f4f5dbe8f9fab5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86c7e8e2f4efe3e8e8e3a8cce9eee8f5e9e8c6f5e4e7a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>; 202-205-6605.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to its authority in section 
8(b)(13) of the Small Business Act, (15 U.S.C. 637), SBA is renewing 
the Audit and Financial Management Advisory Committee. This 
discretionary committee is being renewed in accordance with the 
provision of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 
App.)
    The AFMAC is tasked with providing recommendations and advice 
regarding the Agency's financial management, including the financial 
reporting process, systems of internal controls, audit process and 
process for monitoring compliance with relevant law and regulations.

    Dated: February 3, 2022.
Andrienne Johnson,
SBA Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-02627 Filed 2-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### People v Zdrojewski,

No. 91053;

Court of Appeals No. 127865.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 25, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 Date: August 9, 2006/s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman, President, andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)August 9, 2006/s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)August 9, 2006
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Helen Butta, Deceased. Nicholas Pagani, Respondent; Rosario Butta, as Executor, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 343]

Decree, Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County (Lee Holzman, S.), entered on or about September 9, 2002, which, inter alia, granted the petition, adjudged the subject account a joint account with right of survivorship, and directed the bank to recognize petitioner as the sole owner, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The testimony of a bank employee that the signature cards used by the bank when the subject account was opened contained right of survivorship language was, in the face of the bank’s inability to produce the actual signature card for the account, sufficient proof that such language in fact appeared on the signature card with which the account was opened. It is therefore unnecessary to determine whether the presumption of a joint account with rights of survivorship (Banking Law § 675 [b]) may arise from other proof.

The executor failed to rebut the statutory presumption by clear and convincing evidence that the account was merely one of convenience *(see Pinasco v Ara,*219 AD2d 540 [1995]), especially in light of the decedent’s failure upon receipt of her bank statements to object to petitioner’s withdrawals from the account. Nor did the executor shift the burden to petitioner to show that the opening of the account was not attributable to undue influence, since the executor failed to make the requisite threshold showing that a confidential relationship existed *(compare e.g. Matter of Gordon v Bialystoker Ctr. & Bikur Cholim,*45 NY2d 692, 699 [1978]; *Sepulveda v Aviles,*308 AD2d 1, 7 [2003]; *Matter of Mazak,*288 AD2d 682, 684 [2001]).

We have considered appellant’s other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
Simon Lee FRANK v. STATE

CR-15-0771

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Third Amendment to Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.34 
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 GAP INC. SUPPLEMENTAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, The Gap, Inc.
(the “Company”) maintains the Gap Inc. Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Plan
previously has been amended; and 
 WHEREAS, further amendment of the Plan now is considered desirable to suspend the pending merger of The
Gap, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan into the Plan, and to suspend the change in the name of the Plan, both of which changes were adopted in the Second Amendment to the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that, pursuant to the power reserved to the Company under Section 12 of the Plan, and in exercise of the authority
delegated to the undersigned officer by resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company dated November 19, 2008, the Plan is hereby amended, effective on the date of the execution of this amendment, by rescinding Particulars 1, 2 and 8 of
the Second Amendment to the Plan, such that no Appendix A shall be added to the Plan pursuant to such Second Amendment, and the name of the Plan shall remain the Gap Inc. Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan until such time as the officers
authorized by resolution of the Board of Directors determine that the name shall be changed. 
 *        *        * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer has
executed this amendment on behalf of the Company, this 19th day of December, 2008. 
  

			
	THE GAP, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ William Tompkins
		 	Senior Vice President, Total Rewards


  

 -2-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10830

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DENNIS ANTHONY KLINE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-195-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney representing Dennis Anthony Kline in his appeal from the

revocation of supervised release has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed

a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Kline has

not filed a response.

During the pendency of this appeal, Kline completed his sentence of

imprisonment, and he has no further term of imprisonment or supervised release

to serve. The appeal is, therefore, moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 20, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10830 Document: 00511701729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2011
No. 10-10830

14 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly,

the appeal is dismissed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied as

unnecessary.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.

2

Case: 10-10830 Document: 00511701729 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2011
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Valassis Communications, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge and belief that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/Alan F. Schultz     
|                        |  |  |  | Alan F. Schultz        
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
1667 K Street, N.W., Suite 300 | Washington, DC 20006 | www.cspa.org | 202-872-8110

Agenda

CAPHRA-EPA Technical Meeting

Thursday, February 7, 2013

1:00-4:00pm EST

OPP Scientists and Regulatory teams meeting 

I. Introduction

• Overall goals

• Working Groups, Collaborators, and Project Outline 

• Project Management - Timelines and tracking 

• Ensuring Data Quality

II. Detailed project updates

• Progress and remaining milestones for each project

• Technical discussion of major decisions/design elements

III. Preparing for SAP meeting 

IV. Application of Data 

V. Next Meeting
Brandon Rachon BEACHEM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4501

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882342
<NAME> 90CC
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          80,362
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,983
<PP&E>                                       5,763,392
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,587,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,307,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,788
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,279,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,307,970
<SALES>                                        332,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               335,607
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  340,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,725)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,725)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>