alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-825

_____________________________

BRYAN KEITH WADSWORTH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

Darlene F. Dickey, Judge.

September 13, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and MAKAR and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 3

""" 'ii' 

## "" 

# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT AND WISVEST-CONNECTICUT, UC TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER 0.8177 MODIFICATION NO. 1

TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION 

### In the matterofaTrading Agreement and Order between the CommissionerofEnvironmental Protection eCommissioner") and Wisvesl-Connecticut, LLC ("Wisvest"). WHEREAS, the Commissioner and Wisvest. having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8177 issued on May 31,2000, do now, by mutual agreement, modify saidTrading Agreement and Orderas follows: I. Delete paragraph C.l.e. and substitute the following therefor: 

# , ,/ Ozone Season Restrictions. The boiler is subject to Section 22a-174-22a ofthe Regulations ("NOx Budget Program") in 1999 and every year thereafter. The boiler may generate ozone season 

### BERes to comply with Section 22a-174-22 ofme Regulations in accordance wim paragraph C.I.a. and me following conditions and restrictions: 1) BERCs shall only be generated by the boilerfrom May 1 through September 30 ofa given year, 2) BERCs shall only be used by otherNOx Budget Program sources located in Connecticut, 3) BERCs shall only be used to offset ozone season excess emissions, and shall not be used for compliance during the non-ozone season; and 4) BERes generated during a given year shall only 

### be used during the following ozone season, with the exception ofBERCs generated during 1999, which may 

### be used in the 2001 ozone season. Forexample, BERCs generated during the 1999 ozone season may be used during the 2001 ozone season. However, BERCs generated during the 2000 ozone season may only be used during the 2001 ozone season. BERCs may be generated until May 1, 2003. BERCs are subject to all ERC requirements set forth in this Trading Agreement and Order except for those requirements pertaining solely to non-ozone season ERCs and as otherwise may be provided. All other tenns and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order no. 8177 issued by the Commissioner acting under Chapter446c, Sections 22a-6, 22a-I71, 22a-174, 22a-176, and 22a177 ofthe Connecticut General Stamtes shall remain in effect.

Initials: 

# 'E1t Date: (Prinled on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Slrecl • Hanford. CT 06106· S127 hnp:J/dcp.st:lle.CI.U$ A" c',/waf Oppurfwn;'J Empl''Jf!T eld;ra/inl COfllltC/iCIl/Coas/alRtSOllrctManagtmt'nt: 1980 ·1000

### WISVEST-CONNECfICUT, llC 2 TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER NO. 8177 MODIFICATION NO. I WisveSl-Connecticut, LLC hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to 

### the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice. Wisvest·Connecticut,

# lie Signature:

# --,0Z'-'.~::::- =",--"d;;:z.....L:/L1<"",==,,=o>'

__ Type Name: Thomas D. Kirk 

### Type Title: 

## ----i;-.=WlaA

### as<.--7"-,-

Entered as amodification

### o~.er'der ofthe

### COJp~ssiojJer ofE

### iro"p(i1~~;f~~

.numbered 8177 this 

## 12 day of

### ~/ 2 I. 

### I

CITY OFBRIDGEPORT LAND RECORDS MAilED 

### CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Certified Document No. 1625 0394
#### Hicks et al. vs. Badham.

The questions of law arising upon a demurrer to the declaration, which has been overruled by the court, will be considered as waived by filing a plea in bar.

(The case of *State Bank vs. Gonway,*13 *Arle.*354, and subsequent cases, as to new trials.)

*Appeal from Phillips Oi/rcuit Court.*

Palher and. "WatKINS *&*Gallagher, for appellants.

Fowler & Stillwell, for appellee.

Mr. Justice HaNly

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action of assumpsit instituted at the May term, 1855, of the Circuit Court of Phillips county by the appellee, for the use, &c., against appellants, founded on a promissory note. The plea of the general issue, non-assumpsit, was interposed by the defendants below, and issue thereto joined by the plaintiff. This issue was submitted to the court, sitting as a jury, by consent, and there was a finding and judgment by the court in favor of the plaintiff, for the amount of the noté sued on, with interest. There was an exception taken to the finding of the court upon the evidence, and a bill of exceptions signed and sealed, purporting to embody and contain all the evidence adduced at the trial, but which we do not deem material to state, or farther notice, in the view of the disposition which we shall make of the case.

There was a demurrer to the declaration interposed and overruled by the court; to which, the defendants below excepted, but having interposed their plea in bar afterwards, and not saving the point by their bill of exceptions taken to the finding of the *404court upon the evidence, the questions of law arising on such demurrer, must be considered -as waived by their subsequent plea in bar.

There was no motion for a new trial.

This case, therefore, falls fully within the rule laid down by this court in *State Bank vs. Conway, 13 Ark. Rep.*354, 355; *Jones et al. vs. Gatlin,*16 *Ark. Rep.*35, and *Kinney et al. vs. Heald,*just decided. *Lefils & Christian vs. Sugg,*15 *Ark. Rep.*137.

Judgment of the Circuit Court of Phillips county, is, therefore, affirmed, with costs. . ' ..

Absent, Mr. Justice Soott.
Damien A. DUFF-PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-740

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Craig K. CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-911

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas E. Mara, as Chief Executive Officer of The FINOVA Group Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2006



By:

/s/ Thomas E. MaraThomas E. MaraChief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Javier PEREZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50091

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 14, 2017 *

Filed February 21, 2017

Karla Davis, Helen H. Hong, Daniel Earl Zipp, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Brian Paul Funk, Esquire, Attorney, Law Offices of Brian P. Funk, San Diego CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Javier Perez-Sanchez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 72-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Perez-Sanchez contends that the district court applied the wrong legal standard to his request for a minor role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, and erred in denying the reduction. We review the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, and its factual finding that a defendant was not a minor participant for clear error. *See United States v. Hurtado,*760 F.3d 1065, 1068 (9th Cir. 2014). Contrary to Perez-Sanchez’s claim, the district court properly compared Perez-Sanchez to his co-participants in the offense, and considered the factors enumerated in the Guideline and the totality of the circumstances, to determine whether Perez-Sanchez was “substantially less culpable than the average participant,” *See*U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A), (C) (2015); *United States v. Quintero-Leyva,*823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016). Moreover, in light of the circumstances of the offense, the district court did not clearly err in concluding that Perez-Sanchez was not a minor participant. *See Hurtado,*760 F.3d at 1069.

Furthermore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Perez-Sanchez to a below-Guidelines term. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circum*538stances, including the large amount of drugs that Perez-Sanchez imported. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1386 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1386

To require retailers who offer products for purchase through a website 
  to disclose on such website the country of origin for each product 
                           offered for sale.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2021

 Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require retailers who offer products for purchase through a website 
  to disclose on such website the country of origin for each product 
                           offered for sale.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Country of Origin Labeling 
Requirement Act''.

SEC. 2. COUNTRY OF ORIGIN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCTS SOLD ON 
              RETAIL WEBSITES.

    (a) Disclosure Requirement.--Any person that operates an Internet 
website (including a mobile application) and that sells or offers for 
sale any product through such website or application, shall disclose on 
such website or application, in a clear and conspicuous manner, the 
country in which such product was manufactured or finally assembled.
    (b) Exclusion.--The requirements in subsection (a) shall not be 
construed to apply to any individual who uses a website operated by 
another person to sell or offer for sale any good or product.

SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT BY THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

    (a) Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices.--A violation of section 
1(a) shall be treated as a violation of a regulation under section 
18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 
57a(a)(1)(B)) regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
    (b) Powers of the Commission.--The Commission shall enforce section 
1(a) in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same 
jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and 
provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) 
were incorporated into and made a part of this Act. Any person who 
violates such section shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to 
the privileges and immunities provided in the Federal Trade Commission 
Act.
    (c) Effect on Other Laws.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
in any way to limit or affect the authority of the Commission under any 
other provision of law.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection  with the  amended  Annual  Report of  Rentrak  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2004,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul A.
Rosenbaum,  Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Paul A. Rosenbaum
    ---------------------
Paul A. Rosenbaum
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Rentrak Corporation
December 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED  SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                     1000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                            JUN-18-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                               SEP-9-1997
<CASH>                                                        150,661
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   2,308
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                     9,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              171,340
<PP&E>                                                        402,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                603,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          44,145
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                          411
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  603,585
<SALES>                                                       135,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              135,302
<CGS>                                                          49,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 107,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                5,089
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              1,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                23,775
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    8,720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   15,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.36
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New World Brands, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
Report), the undersigned, David Rudden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of our
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of New World Brands, Inc.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 28, 2006 |  | /s/ David Rudden                     
|                      |  | David Rudden                         
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | (principal executive officer)
#### Bruman Stalin ALVAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORIZON, LLC, f/k/a Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Regional; Motti Mulleta, M.D., Medical Provider; Barbara SteeL, Supervisor Medical Provider; John Moss, P.A. Physician Assistant; Wexford Health Sources, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-6564

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

Bruman Stalin Alvarez, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, Amy E. Askew, Ryan Alexander Mitchell, Meyers, Rodbell *&*Rosenbaum, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruman Stalin Alvarez appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing Alvarez’s civil complaint. In his informal appellate brief, Alvarez .fails to challenge the district court’s reasons for dismissing his complaint. Accordingly, Alvarez has waived appellate review of those issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Because Alvarez does not have a constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel diming his civil proceedings, his claim that appointed counsel committed a fraud upon the court by filing an inadequate complaint is without, merit. See Pitts v. Shinseki, 700 F.3d 1279, 1284-85 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We deny Wexford Health Sources’ motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
August 31, 2000

PUBLIC HEARING ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL PACKAGED BOILERS, COMMERCIAL WATER HEATERS, HOT WATER SUPPLY BOILERS, AND UNFIRED HOT WATER STORAGE TANKS The Department ofEnergy (Department) recently proposedregulations to implement the standards and test procedures for commercialpackaged boilers, and commercial water heaters, hot water supply boilers, and unfired hot water storage tanks (65 FR48838 and 65 FR48852, August 9,2000). The Department is convening a public hearing (workshop) to solicit views and information that interestedparties believe would aid in the development ofthe final rule regarding energyefficiencyrequirements for these commercialproducts. The workshop will be held onWednesday, September 20 from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00p.m. in Room 1E-245 at the U.S. Department ofEnergy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585. A preliminary agenda is enclosed and a copy ofthe Federal Register Notices is located at ''http://www.eren.doe.gov/buildings/codes_standards/notices/index.html" Ifyou wish to speak at the workshop, please send your request to speak so that the Department receives it by 4:00 p.m., September 6, and please send ten (10) copies ofyour prepared statement so that the Departmentreceives them by 4:00 p.m. on September 13, 2000. Please address your request and statement to Ms. BrendaEdwards-Jones at the Department ofEnergy, Office of Building Research and Standards, Office ofEnergyEfficiency and Renewable Energy, EE-41, Room 11-018, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20585-0121. Ifyou plan to attend the workshop, have any questions, orwish to obtain additional background materials, please contact Ms. Edwards-Jones by telephone at 202-586-2945, orby telefax at 202-586-4617. I look forward to seeing you at the workshop.

Edward O. Pollock, Jr., Director Office ofBuilding Research and Stand r s Office ofBuilding Technology, State a d

Community Programs EnergyEfficiency and Renewable Energy