alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnay James RIKARD, Jr., a/k/a DJ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7602

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 29, 2017

Decided: September 14, 2017

Donnay James Rikard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, James Hunter May, John David Rowell, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donnay James Rikard, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), in which he requested a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.

A district court may reduce a prison term if a defendant’s Guidelines range has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission and the reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) and review de novo a district court’s conclusion on the scope of its legal authority under that provision. *United States v. Muldrow,*844 F.3d 434, 437 (4th Cir. 2016).

Here, the district court did not err when it denied Rikard’s motions to reduce sentence because he received the benefit of a variance at sentencing and his sentence for his drug offense is less than the bottom of his amended Guidelines range. Accordingly, we grant Rikard’s motion to seal and affirm the district court’s orders denying Rikard’s § 3582(c)(2) motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000883369
<NAME> FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,147
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,105
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                698,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   296,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            402,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   402,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, James
F. Winschel, Jr., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of PAREXEL International Corporation; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                                
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 9, 2010 |  |                                                                                
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ James F. Winschel, Jr.                                                     
|                        |  | James F. Winschel, Jr.                                                         
|                        |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Conrad
Lowry, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                          /s/ Conrad Lowry
                                          -------------------------------------
          June 27, 2005                   Conrad Lowry
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Joseph Gerard JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882974
<NAME> CHESTNUT REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      52,672,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,672,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,672,755
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               947,844
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,106,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (158,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (156,564)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### Jerome WANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven Mark FREI, Attorney; Sickles, Frei & Mims, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 16-1955

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

*788Jerome Want, Appellant Pro Se. John A. C. Keith, Laurie Kirkland, Blankingship & Keith, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Want seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to recuse the district court judge assigned to -his case, his motion to appoint counsel, and his motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Want seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appeal-able interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference (A) in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43138, 33-61907, 33-10257, 333-44959, 333-61833, 333-69268, 333-90919, 333-88250, 333-102199, and 333-108443)pertaining to the 1981 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1987 Stock Option Plan, 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1995 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, CEO OptionProgram, VP Sales Option Program and VP Finance & Administration and CFO Option Program of California Micro Devices Corporation and (B) in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-113695, 333-108417, 333-102198, and 333-76206) of ourreport dated May 8, 2003 (except for the second paragraph of Note 9, as to which the date is June 26, 2003) with respect to the 2003 financial statements and schedule of California Micro Devices Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended March 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst& Young, LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

September 1, 2004
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF N.B.,

I.B., and P.B.

NO. 2018-CJ-0617

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2018

Denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15






Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549


Dear Sirs:


We are aware that Acme Metals Incorporated has included our report dated May 7,
1997 (issued pursuant to the provisions of Statement on Auditing Standards No.
71) in the Prospectuses constituting part of its Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-17235, 33-19437 and 33-30841) and in its Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-38747 and 33-59627).  We are also aware of our
responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.


Very truly yours,



/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
May 7, 1997

                                       19
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2
                                       April 13, 1997


SPS Transaction Services, Inc.
2500 Lake Cook Road
Riverwoods, Illinois 60015

Dear Gentlemen:

This letter shall amend the letter agreement dated as of September 1, 1995, 
between Dean Witter, Discover & Co. ("Lender") and SPS Transaction Services, 
Inc. ("Borrower"), as amended pursuant to the letter agreement dated as of May 
3, 1996, between Lender and Borrower (collectively, the "Facility Fee 
Agreement"), regarding the Facility Fee payable by Borrower to Lender in 
connection with Loans made by Lender to Borrower under the Financing 
Agreements.  Capitalized terms used herein (and not otherwise defined herein) 
shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Facility Fee Agreement.  

Effective as of the date hereof, the parties agree that Schedule I to the 
Facility Fee Agreement shall be amended in its entirety and henceforth shall 
read as set forth in Schedule I attached hereto; provided that upon the 
amendment, termination, expiration or supplementation of the Credit Agreement 
dated as of April 14, 1997 among Lender, the banks listed therein, the Managing 
Agents referred to therein, The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent 
and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Documentation Agent, Lender 
may, upon ten (10) days prior written notice to Borrower, adjust subpart (ix) 
in Schedule I to reflect changes in Lender's costs related to any of Lender's 
then existing revolving credit agreements; provided further that the portion of 
the Facility Fee covered under subpart (ix) shall be determined in a manner 
consistent with past practice.  Except as provided herein, the Facility Fee 
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

If the foregoing is acceptable, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter 
agreement and return it to my attention.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    DEAN WITTER, DISCOVER & CO.

                                    By:  /S/ Birendra Kumar
                                         -------------------------------

                                    Its:  Treasurer
                                         -------------------------------

ACCEPTED AND AGREED

SPS TRANSACTION SERVICES, INC.

By: /S/ Thomas M. Goldstein
    ---------------------------

Its:  Vice President - Finance
     --------------------------
Sherry Moore COLLINS v. David James COLLINS

No. 2018-CC-0382

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRIT TO THE THIRTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TERREBONNE**

*547Writ granted in part.

GENOVESE, J., concurs in the result.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 5474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-496-000.
    Applicants: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2022 Tariff Filing Removing 
North Bakken Expansion Service Agreement to be effective 2/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/25/22.
    Accession Number: 20220125-5120.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/7/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 26, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01993 Filed 1-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 9





Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the
annual report on Form 40F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) by New Gold Inc. (the
“Company”), I, Paula Myson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated: March 29, 2018





|/s/ Paula Myson |  | 
|--------------- |  | 

Paula Myson
Chief Financial Officer
Ernest Lerenza PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4814

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
POWER OF ATTORNEY        


          KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned
director of Premark International, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
(the "Corporation"), hereby constitutes and appoints John M.
Costigan, L. John Fletcher and Thomas M. Roehlk, and each of
them, true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents of the
undersigned, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, in any
and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Corporation for its fiscal year ended December 30, 1995, and any
and all amendments thereto, and to file or cause to be filed the
same, together with any and all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents and substitutes, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises as
fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents and substitutes, and each of them,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set
his or her hand and seal this 1st day of March, 1996.




                                  William O. Bourke        



                                   Ruth M. Davis           



                                    Lloyd C. Elam          



                                    Clifford J. Grum      



                                    Joseph E. Luecke     



                                    Bob Marbut           



                                    John B. McKinnon     



                                    David R. Parker      



                                    Robert M. Price      



                                    Janice D. Stoney
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

**Rentrak Corporation**

**Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors**

Each non-employee director of Rentrak Corporation (“Rentrak”) receives an annual retainer of $30,000. In addition, thechair of the Compensation Committee receives a $3,000 annual retainer, the chair of the Audit Committee receives a $5,000 annual retainer, and each other non-employee director who serves on the Audit Committee receives a $2,500 annualretainer. Non-employee directors are also paid $1,200 for each board or committee meeting they attend in person or by telephone conference call. Rentrak also reimburses directors for their travel expenses for each meeting attended inperson. 

In accordance with the provisions of Rentrak’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan approved by the shareholders at the 2005 annualmeeting, the Board of Directors approved the award of 9,000 deferred stock units (“DSUs”) to each non-employee director on June 15, 2006. The DSUs represent the right to receive an equal number of shares of Rentrak’s CommonStock pursuant to the terms and conditions of the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan on a deferred basis in compliance with the terms of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The awards of DSUs will vest in full on June 15,2007, provided that the recipient continues to be a non-employee director on that date, and provided further that the DSUs will fully vest upon termination of the recipient’s service on the Board due to death or disability or a change incontrol of Rentrak before that date. The awards of DSUs will be payable following the recipient’s ceasing to be a director of Rentrak. 

The Board also approved annual grants of 9,000 DSUs to each non-employee director each April 1 (beginning in 2007) on terms comparable to those described above.
Consent of Kathleen Altman
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with,  and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Mesquite Mine, Imperial County, California, USA” dated February 28, 2014, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2013, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
 
 Dated this 28th day of March, 2014
 
 
 “Kathleen A. Altman”Name:
Kathleen A. Altman, Ph.D., P.E.Title:
Principal Metallurgist
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jeffrey M. GLICKMAN, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4721

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 02, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
Jesse Keith WIGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3642

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.