alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13A-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Annual Report of New World Brands, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report),
the undersigned, Selvin Passen, M.D., Chairman of the Board Marvin Ribotsky,
Director and Mark Weber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of our knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of New World Brands,
Inc.


Date:  August 30, 2004                  /s/ Costas Ataliotis
                                        -----------------------
                                        Costas Ataliotis
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (principal executive officer)


Date:  August 30, 2004                  /s/ Mark Weber
                                        -----------------------
                                        Mark Weber
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (principal accounting officer
                                        commencing May 22, 2004)


Date:  August 30, 2004                  /s/ Marvin Ribotsky
                                        -----------------------
                                        Marvin Ribotsky,
                                        Chairman of the Board
                                        (principal accounting officer
                                        through May 22, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1381 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1381

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
                deduction for qualified business income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2021

   Mr. Smith of Missouri (for himself, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Taylor, Mr. 
       Gottheimer, Mr. Burchett, Mrs. Hinson, Mr. Arrington, Mr. 
Reschenthaler, Mr. Perry, Mr. Guest, Mr. Turner, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Rodney 
  Davis of Illinois, Mr. Cole, Mr. Katko, Mr. Long, Mr. Jackson, Mrs. 
    Lesko, Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio, Mr. Comer, Mr. Budd, Mr. Rogers of 
Alabama, Ms. Herrell, Mr. Meuser, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Hern, Mr. Kustoff, 
  Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Mrs. 
 McClain, Mr. Cline, Mr. Cawthorn, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Smucker, 
   Mr. Meijer, Mr. Posey, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. Jacobs of New York, Mr. 
  Estes, and Mrs. Walorski) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
                deduction for qualified business income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Main Street Tax Certainty Act''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED BUSINESS INCOME MADE PERMANENT.

    Section 199A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking subsection (i).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



|(1) | The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                   
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: February 13, 2009 |  |                                   
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Stryker Warren, Jr.           
|                        |  | Stryker Warren, Jr.               
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer           
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Rebecca J. Weber              
|                        |  | Rebecca J. Weber                  
|                        |  | Controller and Director of Finance
Darryl SCHNEIDER, Appellant, v. Robert WELKER, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2243

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,780
<SECURITIES>                                    19,329
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,846
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,799
<INVENTORY>                                     13,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,254
<PP&E>                                         105,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,859
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,294
<SALES>                                         80,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,928
<CGS>                                           28,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    46
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,205
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,969
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,969
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.70<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                               15,575       
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     95,370
<PP&E>                                            1,040,595  
<DEPRECIATION>                                      898,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      236,995    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               220,286
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0 
<OTHER-SE>                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        236,995
<SALES>                                                   0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     60,239
<CGS>                                                     0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    7,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      24,097  
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  24,097
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              0   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
                                                             

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1274 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-CE-042-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Brian HIBBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-144

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
RECEIVED IN The-V;njrt of Aopeals „.. , Sixth District JUN 3 D 2015

„Wkena, Texlftl THE COURTOFAPPEALS tebraAutrey, Clerk



### SixthAppellate DistrictofTexas atTexarkana
MOTION NOTTO REINSTATEAPPEAL Nos. 06-15-00004-CV, 06-15-00005-CV, and 06-15-00006-CV

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT: 

### Creditor's: Billie Murphy Tremble, Sharon Tremble Donaldson, Selia Tremble Shawkey, Wilmer Forrest Tremble, Jr. "The Tremble Family" aka "The Estate of Wilmer Forrest Tremble, Sr." files this disclosure statement in disagreement with Debtor, Energy Future Holdings Corp., Luminant Mining Company LLC and Subsidiaries.
This is in response to the June 20, 2015, MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL AND TO LIFT THE STAY ON THE BANKRUPTCY by Luminant Mining Company, LLC. We the Tremble Family throw ourselves on the mercy ofthe Court of Appeals, Sixth Appellate District of Texas. We ask that the original decision the Stay be upheld by the Court ofAppeals.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 137 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 137

To authorize funding to increase access to mental health care treatment 
                        to reduce gun violence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 
  on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize funding to increase access to mental health care treatment 
                        to reduce gun violence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mental Health Access and Gun 
Violence Prevention Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds as follows:
            (1) Suicide is the leading cause of gun related deaths in 
        America. More than 60 percent of deaths by guns in the country 
        are the result of individuals using these weapons as a means to 
        commit suicide. Some of these deaths might have been prevented 
        if there were adequate background checks.
            (2) Victims of domestic abuse are more likely to become 
        victims of homicide when a gun is present. Further, individuals 
        who suffer from mental illnesses are more likely to be victims 
        rather than perpetrators of violence.
            (3) Approximately 1 in 4 American adults have a mental 
        illness and nearly half of all adults in America will develop 
        at least one mental illness during their lifetime.
            (4) Less than half of children and adults with diagnosable 
        mental health problems receive the treatment they need.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDING TO INCREASE ACCESS TO MENTAL HEALTH 
              CARE TREATMENT TO REDUCE GUN VIOLENCE.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General of 
the United States, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the 
Commissioner of Social Security $500,000,000 for fiscal year 2022 to 
carry out programs and activities authorized by provisions of law other 
than this Act--
            (1) to increase access to mental health care treatment and 
        services; and
            (2) to encourage and assist the reporting of relevant 
        disqualifying mental health information to the National Instant 
        Criminal Background Check System.
                                 <all>
```
Alberto SOMOHANO-SOLER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. FANNIE MAE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
*District Judge for the Western District of Louisiana sitting by designation.

**Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 47-5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Fifth

Circuit Rule 47-5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 02-60101

 

JESSE EMMIT RUPERT AND MARJORIE A. RUPERT,

Petitioners - Appellants

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee

 

Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court 

 

January 9, 2003

Before BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and WALTER, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM.**

In this appeal, plaintiffs-appellants (“Taxpayers”) argue that the Tax Court clearly erred in

determining that (1) Taxpayers were not entitled to deduct, as business expenses, legal expenses

incurred by their daughter, but paid for by Taxpayers, in her domestic relations litigation; (2)

Taxpayers were entitled to a depreciation deduction on their mobile home but the depreciation was

to take place over a longer tax life than that used by Taxpayers; and (3) Taxpayers were liable for the
2

accuracy-related penalty in I.R.C. §6662(a) with regard to the portion of the underpayment

attributable to Taxpayers’ claim of the deduction for legal and professional fees. 

After carefully considering the briefs and the positions advanced at oral argument, it is clear

that the record reflects that Taxpayers’ daughter’s legal expenses incurred as a result of divorce

proceedings were not ordinary and necessary business expenses attributable to Mr. Rupert’s

engineering consulting business. Thus, these expenses were not deductible. Furthermore, for the

reasons stated by the Tax Court, it was correct to impose an accuracy-related penalty for deduction

of these expenses.

Finally, the record is clear that Taxpayers’ mobile home was not placed in service as rental

property until 1991. Thus, the Tax Court was correct in finding that Taxpayers were entitled to a

27.5-year depreciation deduction under the modified accelerated cost recoversystemfor their mobile

home, rather than the 10-year depreciation deduction available for rental property placed in service

on or before December 31, 1986 claimed by Taxpayers. Tax Reform Act of 1986 (“TRA”),

§203(a)(1)(A); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.167(a)-10(b) and 1.167(a)-11(e)(1)(i); Treas. Reg. §1.167(a)-

11(e)(1)(i); Treas. Reg. §1.46-3(d)(1)(ii).

Accordingly, the Tax Court did not err in its findings. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment

of the Tax Court.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference (A) in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43138, 33-61907, 33-10257, 333-44959, 333-61833, 333-69268, 333-90919, 333-88250, 333-102199, 333-108443 and333-120313) pertaining to the 1981 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1987 Stock Option Plan, 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1995 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, asamended, CEO Option Program, VP Sales Option Program, VP Finance & Administration and CFO Option Program, and 2004 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan of California Micro Devices Corporation and (B) in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(Nos. 333-113695, 333-108417, 333-102198 and 333-76206) of our report dated May 8, 2003 (except for the second paragraph of Note 9, as to which the date is June 26, 2003) with respect to the 2003 financial statements and schedule of California MicroDevices Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended March 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

June 30, 2005
exhibit10-41.htm


    Exhibit
10.41


    


    


    January
14, 2009

    


    Victor
Joseph

    Chief
Technology Officer

    WaferGen
Bio-systems, Inc.

    


    Re:           Salary
Adjustment

    


    Dear
Victor:

    


    Per our
agreement on November 1, 2008, your base salary was reduced from $5,048 per week
($262,500 annualized) to $4,290 per week, effective November 1,
2008.  Please sign below to confirm your agreement to these salary
adjustments.

    


    WaferGen
Bio-Systems, Inc. (“WaferGen”) will increase your base salary to the rate of
$262,500 per year in the event it (a) raises $5 million in gross proceeds from
the sale of its securities in one or more financings on or prior to March 30,
2009, excluding any gross proceeds received in connection with any financings
completed by its subsidiary, WaferGen Biosystems (M) Sd. Bhd., a Malaysian
corporation; or (b) raises after March 30, 2009 funds sufficient to finance
WaferGen’s operations at its then-current burn rate for an additional nine
months after the closing of such financing, as reasonably determined by the
compensation committee of the board of directors of WaferGen.  Such
salary increase would be documented in a written agreement to be signed by the
Company and you.

    


    All other
terms of your Executive Employment Agreement dated May 31, 2007 will remain in
full force and effect, including the severance provisions in Section
10.  In the event you become eligible for severance under Section 10
of your Executive Employment Agreement, your severance will be calculated based
on a salary rate of $262,500 per year.  You acknowledge and agree that
you are waiving any right you may have to terminate your employment for “Good
Reason” under Section 10(e) of your Executive Employment Agreement with respect
to this one-time salary reduction as described above.

    


    We
appreciate your continuing support and contributions to WaferGen during these
challenging times for our industry.

    


                                                              Very truly yours,

    


                                                              /s/ Alnoor
Shivji


                                                              Alnoor Shivji

    


    ACCEPTED
AND AGREED:

    


    Dated:  January
16,
2009                                                                /s/ Victor
Joseph

      Victor Joseph
WELBLEN HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant, v. D. Jay FELDMAN, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2463

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Pierre Jordany LOUIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1908

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 12, 2018

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Warner, Gross and Levine, JJ., concur.