BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 1 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 3 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 4 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 6 of 246




BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 11 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 12 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 14 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 15 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 17 of 246




BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 22 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 24 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 25 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 27 of 246




BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 32 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 33 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 35 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 36 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 38 of 246


BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 41 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 42 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 44 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 45 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 46 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 48 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 49 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 50 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 51 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 52 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 53 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 54 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 55 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 56 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 57 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 58 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 59 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 60 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 61 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 63 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 64 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 65 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 66 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 67 of 246



BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 71 of 246


BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 74 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 75 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 76 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 77 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 78 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 79 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 80 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 81 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 82 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 83 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 84 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 85 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 86 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 87 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 88 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 89 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 90 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 91 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 92 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 93 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 94 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 95 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 96 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 97 of 246
Industrial Hygiene Report

Survey Performed by: Hofman 

Safety & Industrial Hygiene 

Consulting, Inc.

2 Pennwood Road

Lebanon, PA 17042

Phone: 717-304-8876 

Facility: Bristol Armory

Building: RC – Armory

Date of Survey: 21 August 2012

Location: Bristol, RI

Address: 470 Metacom Ave

Bristol, RI 02809

Phone: 401-275-4380

Draft Report Submitted: 7 June 2013

Comments Received: 17 June 2013

Final Report Submitted: 21 June 2013

POC: SSG 

POC Phone: (401) 275-4385

Report submitted to: 

NGB Region North IH Office

301-IH Old Bay Lane

Havre de Grace, MD 21078

Phone: 410-942-0273

State OH Officer: Major 

Bldg P-1 (Medical Section)

1 Minuteman Way

North Kingston, RI 02852

Phone: 401-275-4589

Table of Contents 

Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1

Operation Description ....................................................................................................... 1

Chemical and Physical Agents.......................................................................................... 2

Ventilation......................................................................................................................... 3

Noise ................................................................................................................................. 4

Lighting ............................................................................................................................. 4

Personal Protective Equipment & Other Controls ............................................................ 5

Ergonomics ....................................................................................................................... 5

Written Programs .............................................................................................................. 5

Indoor Air Quality............................................................................................................. 6

Other Issues ....................................................................................................................... 7

Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 7

Appendix A – References 

Appendix B – Building Layout 

Appendix C – Photographs 

Appendix D – Chemical List 

Appendix E – Lab Reports 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 98 of 246

Non-ResponsiveNon-Responsive
RI RC/Armory Bristol Page 1 

August 2012 

Industrial Hygiene Report of Findings 

Rhode Island Army National Guard 

Bristol 

Facility: Readiness Center / Armory 

August 21, 2012 

Executive Summary 

An industrial hygiene evaluation was conducted at the Rhode Island Army National Guard 

Readiness Center (RC) / Armory located in Bristol, Rhode Island on August 21, 2012. The 

Armory in Bristol appears to be a generally well maintained and managed facility. An issue was 

identified with the completeness of the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) file as many more 

chemicals were on site than represented in the file. A cross checking of all lists, including 

creating a list of cleaning products, should be completed and MSDSs obtained for all chemicals. 

Lead was identified in both wipe samples and horizontal surfaces should be wet wiped to remove 

this contaminant from the work environment. A paint chip sample taken from the wall in the 

mechanical room was negative for lead. An asbestos sample taken from pipe insulation in the 

mechanical room was negative for asbestos. Since the mechanical room has numerous signs 

warning of asbestos, further sampling and asbestos identification for particular materials is 

recommended along with an asbestos management plan. Asbestos signage should also be 

adjusted accordingly. A lighting survey was conducted and two areas of low lighting were 

identified. Lighting should be upgraded in the classroom and either upgrades or task lighting 

provided in the offices. It is recommended that two written programs be prepared: one for hazard 

communication and one for personal protective equipment. While a generic program is provided 

in a 1996 safety manual, site specific issues should be addressed including voluntary use of 

filtering facepiece respirators and chemical protection (gloves, safety glasses or goggles, and 

aprons) for chemical usage, including cleaning products. The temperature in many areas was a 

little high for the humidity levels. This can be addressed through the use of fans and good heat 

stress management, including adequate hydration (especially when performing physical work), 

proper light-weight clothing, and adequate rest periods. It was noted that there is a continuing 

issue with water intrusion along the walls of the drill floor. Other issues associated with possible 

erosion of the mortar between the outside bricks could be a contributing factor in the rear storage 

areas. 

Operation Description

The Bristol Armory (Readiness Center) in Bristol, Rhode Island is a field artillery unit. The main 

Armory is comprised of about 19,000 square feet (ft2) and includes a drill floor, offices, a 

training classroom, a locker room, a gym, latrines, a recreation room, and several storage rooms 

and vaults, including supplies for the guns/cannons, e.g. Howitzers. A boiler room is located on a 

lower level. The main drill floor is about two-stores high, with the remainder of the offices and 

classroom on a single story floor. It is believed the building was built in 1956. The current locker 

room used to house a firing range. It was reported that the firing range existed for about 20 years 

prior to 1992. From 1992 to 2007 it was used as a locker room. In 2008 and 2009 it was shut 

down and then abated in the 2009/2010 time frame. It has again been used as a locker room since 

2011. In addition to the main armory building there is a large newer storage building to the rear. 

It is about 9600 ft2. It is humidity controlled and can be used to store larger items such as the 

Howitzers, trucks, trailers and generators. Some equipment is stored for the Armory in Warren. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 99 of 246
RI RC/Armory Bristol Page 2 

August 2012 

The unit has about 30 vehicles assigned including 5-ton and 21⁄2-ton trucks, Humvees, trailers, 

generators, and the Howitzers. 

There are three full-time employees with one deployed at the time of this assessment. The 

weekend troops (M-Day soldiers) number 77, 12 of which are deployed. Workers mostly plan for 

the drills and training that occurs on weekends, including supply and logistics, and driver 

training. Some minor vehicle maintenance may occur such as fluid and tire checks. 

Chemical and Physical Agents 

Personnel perform minor maintenance of vehicles including check and replenish fluids such as 

oil and antifreeze and wash vehicles/equipment. There are two flammable storage cabinets that 

include POL (petroleum, oil, and lubricants), CLP (clean, lube, protect) chemicals for weapons, 

degreasers, spray cleaner, and spray paint cans. A copy of the chemical lists can be found in 

Appendix D. Chemicals were labeled and stored in designated areas and flammable storage 

cabinets. A short cross-check was conducted between the chemical list and the available Material 

Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs.) The chemical list included at least 47 chemicals, not including the 

cleaning chemicals. There were only 10 MSDSs in the file folder. There was a significant 

amount of cleaning chemicals on this site. Many of these were stored on shelves in one of the 

storage areas and in the Janitor’s closet. Workers at this site do their own cleaning. It is 

recommended that a thorough review of the listed chemicals be made along with preparing a list 

of all the cleaning products on site, and that MSDSs be obtained for all chemicals. Ref. 20 (RAC 

3 - Health (MSDSs)) 

Two wipe samples of 100 square centimeters were taken on the day of the assessment: one (W01) 

from the top of a locker in the locker room (decommissioned firing range) and a second from the 

top of a display cabinet on the assembly/drill floor near the kitchen. Both wipe samples were 

collected using Ghost-Wipe sample media and analyzed for lead by AMA Analytical Services, 

Inc., an American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited laboratory. Lead was detected in 

concentrations exceeding the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) and 

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) decontamination level for both samples.

This may indicate an incomplete remediation of the firing range or may indicate crosscontamination from some other source. All horizontal surfaces should be wet wiped with standard 

household cleaning soap/detergent. Do not use spray products. (Dry dusting/dust can introduce 

particulate into the work environment/breathing zone.) Appropriate Personal Protective Equipment 

should be utilized. (See Table A.) Until that time, workers and weekend soldiers should be 

reminded to practice good personal hygiene (washing hands, arms and faces) prior to eating and 

before leaving work. Ref. 36 (RAC 3 – Health (Lead)) 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 100 of 246
RI RC/Armory Bristol Page 3 

August 2012 

Table A – Wipe Sampling Results 

Sample No. Location Lead 

μg/ft2

BRIS-W01 On Locker in Locker Room 

(Decommissioned Firing Range) 390

BRIS-W02 On Display Cabinet on Drill Floor Near Kitchen 220

BRIS-W03 Blank - Reporting Limit – per clean wipe < 12 μg 

OSHA/HUD Decontamination Level 200

 Shaded areas indicate that the Decontamination Level was exceeded

Sample Media: Ghost Wipes < = less than or equal to the number shown

μg/ft2= micrograms per square foot 

A sample of peeling paint was collected from the block wall in the lower level Mechanical Room 

and analyzed for lead (Sample BRIS-P04.) (See Table B.) There was no lead detected in the 

paint chip. Environmental Protection Agency and HUD guidelines designate lead levels in 

excess of 0.5% as being leaded paint. Ref. 29 

Table B – Paint Chip Sampling Results

Sample No. Location Lead

Percent (%) 

BRIS-P04 Paint from a Block wall in Basement <0.0087

HUD Definition of Lead Paint 0.5

A bulk sample was collected of pipe insulation in the mechanical room and analyzed for 

asbestos. Results can be found in Table C. The sample did not contain asbestos. It should be 

noted that there were numerous signs on both the door to the mechanical room and on the pipes 

themselves that asbestos was present. A more thorough inspection, including additional 

sampling, of this area should be conducted to determine if/where asbestos does exists and where 

it does not. An asbestos management plan should be prepared as needed and signage adjusted 

accordingly. See requirements in OSHA regulations at 29 CFR 1910.1001, and specifically 

1910.1001 (j). Ref. 23 (RAC 4 - Health (Asbestos Identification and Signage))

Table C – Suspect Asbestos Bulk Sample Results 

Sample No. Location Results % Asbestos

BRIS-B05 Pipe Insulation from Pipe in Basement No Asbestos

Ventilation 

There were no vehicle exhaust, battery charging room, welding or paint booth ventilation 

systems to measure in the Armory. 

There was an exhaust hood over the 10-burner stove in the kitchen. Site personnel reported that 

food for the troops is catered and that the stove is seldom used. The exhaust measured for the 

hood was 2396 cubic feet per minute (CFM) which meets the 300 cfm per lineal foot air flow 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 101 of 246
RI RC/Armory Bristol Page 4 

August 2012 

requirement. (Ref. 13) Following are the results of the kitchen hood measurements (See Table 

D.) 

Table D – Kitchen Hood Ventilation Survey Results (Medium Duty Appliances) 

Location of 

Measurement

Lineal Feet 

of Hood

Air Volume 

(cubic feet per 

minute (cfm))

CFM per

Lineal Foot Standard (cfm)/Met 

Standard?

Stove Hood 6 2396 399 300 cfm per lineal foot 

/ Yes

Reference: International Mechanical Code2012, from the International Code Council (ICC) 

General building heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) is discussed below under 

Indoor Air Quality. 

Noise

Full-shift noise dosimetry was not conducted since there were no activities that generate high 

noise levels. Workers in the supply, training and office areas did not use pneumatic tools or 

discharge weapons or operate vehicles or equipment that would generate excessive noise levels. 

Lighting

A lighting survey of the facility was conducted and two areas were found to be insufficient for 

the work performed: a classroom and an office. Task lighting may be used in the office to meet 

this requirement. (Ref. 8 & 33) (RAC 5 – Safety (Illumination)). Survey results can be found 

in Table E. The time of day was morning, and there was natural light filtering in through the 

windows of some classrooms and offices. All other areas had adequate lighting for the work 

performed. 

Table E - Lighting Survey Results 

Location of Measurement Foot Candles Standard (Ref. 8)

Room 1022-1023 30 30

Drill Floor 95 30

Classroom 17 30

Men’s Latrine 60 7

Ladies Latrine 22 7

Kitchen 52 50

Boiler Room 48 30

Storage 1016 46 30*

Storage 50 30*

Gym 1007 52 30

Office 1004 26 30

Locker Room 29 7

Ref. American National Standards Institute, Inc. / Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, RP-7-01, 

Lighting Industrial Facilities 2001, and RP-1-2004, Office Lighting, 2004. Shaded areas do not meet the light 

standard requirements. Area measurements were taken approximately 4 1⁄2 feet from floor level; measurements 

taken at desks were approximately 30 inches from floor level. *Requirement for areas being used for storage: 30 FC 

– Active Small Items; 15 FC – Active Bulky Items; 5 FC - Inactive. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 102 of 246
RI RC/Armory Bristol Page 5 

August 2012 

Personal Protective Equipment & Other Controls 

As this is a readiness center / office setting, there is little need for Personal Protective Equipment 

(PPE) during normal operations. Each employee has been issued gloves, eye protection, hearing 

protection and head protection as part of their standard gear. 

There is no eyewash and no carbon monoxide monitor at this location. Other controls, such as 

ventilation, are discussed in that appropriate section. 

Ergonomics 

Some periodic manual lifting does occur at this facility. It was noted that a pallet jack was 

available on the drill floor. There were few ergonomic concerns seen in other duties at the 

facility. 

Written Programs 

1. Confined Spaces (29 CFR 1910.146) – While there was a heating fuel tank to the East of the 

building, there did not appear to be other spaces that Guard members would need to enter. 

Therefore a confined space program would not appear to be required. 

2. Hearing Conservation (29 CFR 1910.95 and DA PAM 40-501) – There did not appear to be 

any noise issues at this facility, therefore, a Hearing Conservation Program would not 

normally be required. Hearing protection was available on site should periodic noise issues 

present. (Ref. 3 & 18) 

3. Respiratory Protection (29 CFR 1910.134) – There did not appear to be any air contaminants 

requiring use of respiratory protection. At most, filtering facepiece respirators may be used 

for clean-up. This would require provision of Voluntary use per OSHA regulations at 29 

CFR 1910.134. 

4. HAZCOM (29 CFR 1910.1200) - There is no site-specific written Hazard Communication 

Program available at the facility. The safety manual dated 1 January 1996 does contain a 

Hazard Communication Program that could be used by the Armory. A recommendation 

concerning lack of MSDSs sheets was listed above under “Chemical Agents.” Note: A new 

Hazard Communication rule was published by OSHA on March 26, 2012. This rule will 

require re-training of all workers by December 2013, notably for the new labeling and new 

Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) requirements which will replace the old MSDS system. It is 

recommended that a site-specific hazard communication written program be prepared, 

including training elements, to comply with the current and new regulation. (Ref. 20) (RAC 

4– Health (Hazard Communication))

5. PPE (29 CFR 1910.132) - A site-specific written Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 

Program was not provided. However, the safety manual dated 1 January 1996 does have 

elements of a general program that could be used by the Armory if hazard assessments were 

performed. Because of the number and types of chemical usage at this facility, including 

cleaning agents, hazard assessments per requirements of 29 CFR 1910.132(d) should be done 

in order to comply with the regulations contained in 29 CFR 1910.132 - .138. The MSDSs 

can also be consulted for proper PPE to be used with the cleaning products. (Ref. 21) (RAC 

4 – Health (PPE)) 

6. Other: There was no Brake Maintenance, Brake Pad Replacement, Brake Relining, Battery 

Charging, or Surface Lead Contamination programs available. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 103 of 246
RI RC/Armory Bristol Page 6 

August 2012 

Indoor Air Quality 

The indoor air quality measurements were within acceptable ranges in the Bristol Armory with 

the exception of the temperature. There is no air conditioning in the building except for a standalone unit in the main storage office. Results can be found in Table F. Comfort guidelines would 

indicate that at 60% relative humidity, an operative temperature in the range of 72° F to 78° F 

would be acceptable for most individuals. At 50% relative humidity the acceptable operative 

temperature range would be 76° F to 83° F. The temperature levels were at or only slightly over 

the upper acceptable operative comfort level for most individuals. This can be addressed through 

the use of fans and good heat stress management, including adequate hydration (especially when 

performing physical work), proper light-weight clothing, and adequate rest periods.

(Ref. 34) (RAC 5 – Health (Thermal Comfort))

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) concentrations were close to outside levels in most areas. All 

concentrations were well below the recommended maximum level of 1030 parts of chemical to 

million parts of air (ppm) (700 ppm greater than the outdoor background level) based on outdoor 

air levels of 330 ppm (Ref. 6). Carbon Monoxide (CO) was not identified during this survey. 

The outside temperature was 81° F and the relative humidity was 46%. The sky was sunny. 

Table F – Indoor Air Quality Survey Results 

Location of Measurement Temperature

Degrees

Fahrenheit 

oF

Relative 

Humidity

Percent

%

Carbon 

Dioxide

ppm

Carbon 

Monoxide

ppm

Outside 11:00 Hours 81 46 330 0

Room 1022-1023 79 59 340 0

Drill Floor (Rear Garage Door Open) 81 54 337 0

Classroom 80 59 343 0

Men’s Latrine 80 57 365 0

Ladies Latrine 79 57 331 0

Kitchen 80 56 353 0

Boiler Room 80 60 367 0

Storage 1016 79 61 377 0

Storage 80 61 351 0

Gym 1007 78 60 360 0

Office 1004 78 62 391 0

Locker Room 78 61 372 0

Acceptable Maximum Guideline Levels 76 – 83 

@ 50% RH

< 60 1030 9

72 – 78 

@ 60% RH

References for Guideline Levels: American National Standards Institute, Inc. / American Society 

of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Standards 62.1 – 2010 and 55-2010. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 104 of 246
RI RC/Armory Bristol Page 7 

August 2012 

Other Issue

Housekeeping – Housekeeping was in good condition in most areas.

Building Issues – This building is approximately 56 years old. It is believed the roof was 

replaced approximately 10 years ago. Water intrusion was noticeable in some areas, especially 

about mid-way up the drill floor walls, which are two stories high. It appears the leaks are 

concentrated between the drill floor walls and the first floor lower roof extensions. Some leakage 

could also be occurring through the windows. It manifested as a ring of damage and 

discoloration around the hall. (Photo provided in Appendix C.) It is suspected that the flashing 

between the lower roof and the drill floor outer walls may be compromised. 

Two other areas of water damage were noted. These were in Rooms 1013 and 1015, both storage 

areas with block walls. In both instances a remediation of issues had been taken prior to the site 

visit. Walls had been scraped and treated with bleach. The walls in Room 1015 had been repainted. In both instances the remediation appeared successful. These rooms both have Northeast 

exposures in the rear of the Armory. Upon inspection of the exterior surface, it appears that the 

mortar on the outside bricks has deteriorated, and that this may be the site of water infiltration. 

Without repairing the cause of the problem it is possible the issue could re-occur. 

Water intrusions are problematic for mold growth. In addition to possible health effects, water 

intrusions are also long term maintenance and possibly structural decay issues. Typically, it will 

be much less costly to prevent or fix any water intrusions as they occur, rather than letting the 

issue fester and provide an opportunity for mold growth followed by required remediation. It is 

recommended that those responsible for building management within the RI guard management 

team conduct a thorough inspection of all water intrusions and take action to implement a quality 

and lasting repair and maintenance program. This recommendation applies to both the flashing 

issue and possible brick/mortar deterioration. (Ref. 30) RAC 4-Health (Water Intrusions) 

Conclusion 

The Armory in Bristol appears to be a generally well maintained and managed facility. An issue 

was identified with the completeness of the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) file as many 

more chemicals were on site than represented in the file. A cross checking of all lists, including 

creating a list of cleaning products, should be completed and MSDSs obtained for all chemicals. 

Lead was identified in both wipe samples and horizontal surfaces should be wet wiped to remove 

this contaminant from the work environment. A paint chip sample taken from the wall in the 

mechanical room was negative for lead. An asbestos sample taken from pipe insulation in the 

mechanical room was negative for asbestos. Since the mechanical room has numerous signs 

warning of asbestos, further sampling and asbestos identification for particular materials is 

recommended along with an asbestos management plan. Asbestos signage should also be 

adjusted accordingly. A lighting survey was conducted and two areas of low lighting were 

identified. Lighting should be upgraded in the classroom and either upgrades or task lighting 

provided in the offices. It is recommended that two written programs be prepared: one for hazard 

communication and one for personal protective equipment. While a generic program is provided 

in a 1996 safety manual, site specific issues should be addressed including voluntary use of 

filtering facepiece respirators and chemical protection (gloves, safety glasses or goggles, and 

aprons) for chemical usage, including cleaning products. The temperature in many areas was a 

little high for the humidity levels. This can be addressed through the use of fans and good heat 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 105 of 246
RI RC/Armory Bristol Page 8 

August 2012 

stress management, including adequate hydration (especially when performing physical work), 

proper light-weight clothing, and adequate rest periods. It was noted that there is a continuing 

issue with water intrusion along the walls of the drill floor. Other issues associated with possible 

erosion of the mortar between the outside bricks could be a contributing factor in the rear storage 

areas. 

Hofman Safety would like to thank SSG for his help in gathering information and 

providing access to the Armory in order to complete this assessment. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 106 of 246

Non-Responsive
















































BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 155 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 157 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 158 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 160 of 246




Industrial Hygiene Report

Survey Performed by: Hofman 

Safety & Industrial Hygiene 

Consulting, Inc.

2 Pennwood Road

Lebanon, PA 17042

Phone: 717-304-8876 

Facility: Readiness Center / MP

Building: Readiness Center

Date of Survey: 15 August 2012

Location: Warren, RI

Address: 104 Market Street

Warren, RI 02885

Phone: 401-275-4470

Draft Report Submitted: 20 May 2013

Comments Received: 28 May 2013

Final Report Submitted: 31 May 2013

POC:

POC Phone: (401) 556-2240

Report submitted to: 

NGB Region North IH Office

301-IH Old Bay Lane

Havre de Grace, MD 21078

Phone: 410-942-0273

State OH Officer: Major 

Bldg P-1 (Medical Section)

1 Minuteman Way

North Kingston, RI 02852

Phone: 401-275-4589

Table of Contents 

Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1

Operation Description ....................................................................................................... 1

Chemical and Physical Agents.......................................................................................... 1

Ventilation......................................................................................................................... 3

Noise ................................................................................................................................. 3

Lighting ............................................................................................................................. 4

Personal Protective Equipment & Other Controls ............................................................ 4

Ergonomics ....................................................................................................................... 4

Written Programs .............................................................................................................. 4

Indoor Air Quality............................................................................................................. 5

Other Issues ....................................................................................................................... 6

Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 6

Appendix A – References 

Appendix B – Building Layout 

Appendix C – Photographs 

Appendix D – Vehicle List, Equipment List and Chemical List 

Appendix E – Lab Reports 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 165 of 246

Non-Responsive Non-Responsive
RI RC Warren Page 1 

July 2012 

Industrial Hygiene Report of Findings 

Rhode Island Army National Guard 

Warren 

Facility: Readiness Center 

August 15, 2012 

Executive Summary 

An industrial hygiene evaluation was conducted at the Rhode Island Army National Guard 

Readiness Center (RC) / located in Warren, Rhode Island on August 21, 2012. The Readiness 

Center in Warren is predominately an office / administration operation with few industrial 

hygiene-related issues. Levels of lead were sampled in the cage storage area, which previously 

housed a firing range, and on the drill floor food service area. Lead results showed no 

contamination in the old firing range area, with levels just over guideline levels found on top of 

the refrigerator. A written Hazard Communication Program should be prepared as well as 

documentation to show compliance with the Personal Protective Equipment hazard assessment 

and training requirements. There was evidence of a history of water intrusion that should be 

addressed. Standard indoor air quality parameters showed temperatures warmer than typically 

comfortable. 

Operation Description 

The Warren Readiness Center in Warren, Rhode Island houses the 169th Military Police 

Company. The facility includes: a drill floor, offices, a break room, classroom, storages areas, 

male and female latrines and showers, a weapons vault, a kitchen and a mechanical room, which 

is on a lower level. The building encompasses 13,704 square feet. The storage area on the East 

side of the building, which includes some lockers, was previously a firing range. It is believed it 

was converted to storage circa 2008, but this could not be confirmed. Additional lockers are 

located on the East side of the drill floor. 

The facility normally houses five (5) full-time workers. Up to 150 soldiers drill at the facility one 

weekend per month. The five full-time workers typically perform activities related to 

maintaining the building and equipment, assuring supplies are available, and planning drills and 

training exercises for the monthly troops. Some minor vehicle checks are performed, with the 

local Facility Maintenance Shop performing vehicle maintenance functions. At the time of this 

assessment, all troops assigned to this facility were recently deployed. Just a few individuals 

from the Camp Fogarty troop command center were on hand to ready the facility for temporary 

closure while the soldiers are deployed. These individuals were instrumental in providing 

information for this assessment. The unit normally houses some equipment, including: numerous 

Humvees (approximately 38,) 5-ton trucks, a wrecker, water buffalo, a mobile kitchen, numerous 

trailers (approximately 23,) and generators. Potential exposures include: commercial cleaning 

products, paints, solvents, vehicle fluids, weapon cleaning / lubricating fluids, slips, trips and 

falls, and ergonomic hazards associated with material handling. The floor diagram can be found 

in Appendix B. Photographs can be found in Appendix C. 

Chemical and Physical Agents 

Personnel perform minor maintenance of vehicles including check and replenish fluids such as 

oil and antifreeze and wash vehicles/equipment. There are two flammable storage cabinets that 

contain items such as paint thinner, oven cleaner, starting fluid, grease off and paint. A copy of 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 166 of 246
RI RC Warren Page 2 

July 2012 

the chemical list can be found in Appendix D. Chemicals were labeled and stored in designated 

areas and flammable storage cabinets. The office and administrative workers have no obvious 

chemical exposures. 

A Quick Check surface indicator was used to identify the presence of lead in the South End of the 

storage cages (See Table A.) The Quick Check swab did not show a color change. 

Three wipe samples of 100 square centimeters were taken on the day of the assessment: two (W-71 

and W-72;) from the top of lockers in the cage storage and locker areas - North and South areas 

(decommissioned firing range) and (W-73) on top of a refrigerator in the food prep area of the drill 

floor. The wipe samples were collected using Ghost-Wipe sample media and analyzed for lead by 

AMA Analytical Services, Inc., an American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited 

laboratory. Lead was detected in concentrations just over the Department of Housing and Urban 

Development (HUD) Decontamination level of 200 micrograms of lead per square foot of surface 

area (μg/ft2) for the sample from the top of a refrigerator in the food prep area located near the drill 

floor. 

Table A – Quick Check Surface Sampling Results 

Location Lead

South End of Storage Cages ND

Color Change Detection Limit (μg) 2μg

USACHPPM Screening Level 22 μg/100cm2

Sample Media: Quick Check Tubes – If target metal is present, the swab turns to an indicator color. 

ND = none detected

Table B – Wipe Sampling Results 

Sample No. Location Lead 

μg/ft2

WRN-W-71

On Locker in Storage/Locker Room North Side

(Decommissioned Firing Range) <110

WRN-W-72 On Locker in Cage Storage Area South Side 

(Decommissioned Firing Range) <110

WRN-W-73 Top of Refrigerator in Food Serving Area on Drill 

Floor 210

WRN-W-76 Blank - Reporting Limit – per clean wipe < 12 μg 

OSHA/HUD Decontamination Level 200

 Shaded areas indicate that the Decontamination Level was exceeded

Sample Media: Ghost Wipes < = less than or equal to the number shown

μg/ft2= micrograms per square foot 

A sample of peeling paint was collected from the cage area ceiling and analyzed for lead. 

Sample WRN-B-74. (see Table C) There was no lead detected in the paint chip. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines designate lead levels in excess of 0.5% as being leaded 

paint. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 167 of 246
RI RC Warren Page 3 

July 2012 

Table C – Paint Chip Sampling Results

Sample No. Location Lead

Percent (%) 

WRN-B-74 Paint from the Cage Area Ceiling <0.0059

EPA/HUD Definition of Lead Paint 0.5

All the sample data taken together would indicate minor concern over lead contamination. The 

HUD rules mainly apply to housing where children can ingest lead-containing dust, not adults in 

a work setting. The fact that the samples in the firing range area tested clean would indicate that 

sufficient cleaning was performed during decommissioning. 

A bulk sample was collected of the cage area ceiling material. This was a very unusual shaped 

material resembling painted straw. Results can be found in Table D. The ceiling sample from 

the cage area did not contain asbestos. 

Table D – Suspect Asbestos Bulk Sample Results 

Sample No. Location Results % Asbestos

WRN-B-75 Ceiling From Cage Area No Asbestos Detected

Ventilation 

There were no vehicle exhaust, battery charging room, welding or paint booth ventilation 

systems to measure in the RC.

There was an exhaust hood over the 6-burner stove and griddle in the kitchen. Following are the 

results of the kitchen hood measurements (see Table E). 

Table E – Kitchen Hood Ventilation Survey Results (Medium Duty Appliances) 

Location of 

Measurement

Lineal Feet 

of Hood

Air Volume 

(cubic feet per 

minute (cfm))

CFM per Lineal 

Foot Standard /Met 

Standard?

Stove/Griddle Hood 6 2306 385 300 cfm/lineal foot

/Yes

Reference: International Mechanical Code 2012, from the International Code Council (ICC) (Ref. 

13) 

Noise

Full-shift noise dosimetry was not conducted since there were no activities that generate high 

noise levels. Workers in the supply, training and office areas did not use pneumatic tools or 

discharge weapons or operate vehicles or equipment that would generate excessive noise levels. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 168 of 246
RI RC Warren Page 4 

July 2012 

Lighting

A lighting survey of the facility was conducted and all areas had adequate lighting for the work 

performed. Survey results can be found in Table F. The time of day was morning, and there was 

natural light filtering in through the windows of some of the offices and the drill floor. 

Table F - Lighting Survey Results 

Location of Measurement Foot Candles Standard (Ref. 8)

Drill Floor – Bay Door Open 180 30

Supply Room 33 *30

Cage Area 37 *30

Commander Office 50 30

Operation Room SW Corner 31 30

Kitchen 74 50

Administration Office – (Three People) 76 30

Boiler Room Lower Level 57 30

Briefing Room NW Corner 88 30

Ref. American National Standards Institute, Inc. / Illuminating Engineering Society of North 

America, Lighting Industrial Facilities 2001. Area measurements were taken approximately 4 1⁄2 

feet from floor level; measurements taken at desks were approximately 30 inches from floor 

level. *Requirement for areas being used for storage: 30 FC – Active Small Items; 15 FC –

Active Bulky Items; 5 FC - Inactive. 

Personal Protective Equipment & Other Controls 

This is a readiness center / office setting, and there is little need for Personal Protective 

Equipment (PPE.) There is some PPE available, including leather gloves, safety glasses, and ear 

plugs. Some general comments on PPE are addressed under “Written Programs” below. There is 

no eyewash at the facility. 

Ergonomics 

There were few ergonomic concerns seen at this facility. The predominate risk would be material 

handling. Material handling aids are available, such as hand trucks. 

Written Programs 

1. Confined Spaces (29 CFR 1910.146) – There did not appear to be any confined space issues 

at this facility, therefore a confined space program would not be required. The RI Guard 

state- issued confined space program was available. 

2. Hearing Conservation (29 CFR 1910.95 and DA PAM 40-501) – There did not appear to be 

any noise issues at this facility, therefore, a Hearing Conservation Program would not 

normally be required. The RI Guard state-issued program was available. 

3. Respiratory Protection (29 CFR 1910.134) – There did not appear to be any air contaminants 

requiring use of respiratory protection. At most, filtering facepiece respirators may be used 

for clean-up. This would require provision of Voluntary use per OSHA regulations at 29 

CFR 1910.134. The RI Guard state-issued program was available. 

4. HAZCOM (29 CFR 1910.1200) - There is no site-specific written Hazard Communication 

Program available at the facility. The safety standard operating procedures (SSOP) dated 20 

February 2012 does not contain a Hazard Communication Program. Chemical lists and 

MSDSs are available as associated with the flammable storage cabinets. A full chemical vs. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 169 of 246
RI RC Warren Page 5 

July 2012 

MSDS audit was not conducted during this evaluation. There are commercial cleaning 

products on site as well as solvents, automotive fluids and paints. Note: A new Hazard 

Communication rule was published by OSHA on March 26, 2012. This rule will require retraining of all workers by December 2013, notably for the new labeling and new Safety Data 

Sheets (SDSs) requirements which will replace the old MSDS system. It is recommended 

that a site-specific hazard communication written program be prepared, including training 

elements, to comply with the existing and new regulation. (Ref. 20) (RAC 4 – Health 

(Hazard Communication))

5. PPE (29 CFR 1910.132) - A site-specific written Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 

Program was not provided. The SSOP does contain a section on Job Hazard Analyses, which 

could be modified slightly to comply with Appendix B for OSHA regulation in Subpart I. 

OSHA has requirements for a hazard assessment contained in 29 CFR 1910.132(d), with 

requirements for usage of PPE based on hazard contained in 29 CFR 1910.133-.138. While 

PPE needs at this facility would appear to be minimal, the few instances of applicability 

should be addressed and documented, including required training. (Ref. 21) (RAC 4 –

Health (PPE)) 

6. There were no Brake Maintenance, Brake Pad Replacement, Brake Relining, Battery 

Charging, or Surface Lead Contamination programs available, nor would any of these appear 

to be applicable. 

Indoor Air Quality 

The indoor air quality measurements for carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and relative humidity 

were within acceptable ranges in the Warren RC. The temperature exceeded comfort guidelines, 

but not excessively so. Results can be found in Table G. Comfort guidelines would indicate that 

at 60% relative humidity, an operative temperature in the range of 72° F to 78° F would be 

acceptable for most individuals. At 50% relative humidity the acceptable operative temperature 

range would be 76° F to 83° F (Ref 35). The temperature levels averaged 81° F with relative 

humidity above 60%. (Ref. 34) (RAC 4 – Health (Temperature Guidelines))

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) concentrations were close to outside levels in most areas. All 

concentrations were well below the recommended maximum level of 1037 parts of chemical to 

million parts of air (ppm) (700 ppm greater than the outdoor background level) based on outdoor 

air levels of 337 ppm (Ref. 6). 

The outside temperature was 77° F and the relative humidity was 63%. It had rained heavily 

earlier in the day but the sky turned sunnier as the day progressed. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 170 of 246
RI RC Warren Page 6 

July 2012 

Table G – Indoor Air Quality Survey Results 

Location of Measurement Temperature

Degrees

Fahrenheit 

oF

Relative 

Humidity

Percent

%

Carbon 

Dioxide

ppm

Carbon 

Monoxide

ppm

Outside 09:00 Hours 77 63 337 0.1

Drill Floor – Bay Door Open 80 69 358 0

Supply Room 80 65 461 0.1

Cage Area 82 65 443 0

Commander Office 81 66 376 0

Operation Room SW Corner 82 65 368 0

Kitchen 82 64 384 0

Administration Office – (Three People) 81 59 750 0

Boiler Room Lower Level 79 78 406 0

Briefing Room NW Corner (air 

conditioned)

72 51 469 0

Acceptable Maximum Guideline Levels 72 – 78 

@ 60% RH

< 60 1037 9

References for Guideline Levels: American National Standards Institute, Inc. / American Society 

of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Standards 62.1 – 2010 and 55-2010. 

Other Issues 

Housekeeping – Housekeeping was in good condition in most areas, especially considering the 

recent deployment of the 169th. 

Building Issues – This building has a history of window and roof leaks. Upon arrival at the 

facility, pools of water (cordoned off safely with hazard tape) were noted on both the East and 

West floors. Several pictures of damage are presented in Appendix C. Water could be seen 

streaming down along the walls and obvious paint and wall damage indicated a history of 

problems with this building. The rear parking lot floods and water enters the lower level boiler 

room. Water intrusions are problematic for mold growth. In addition to possible health effects, 

water intrusions are also long term maintenance and possibly structural decay issues. Typically, 

it will be much less costly to prevent or fix any water intrusions as they occur, rather than letting 

the issue fester and provide an opportunity for mold growth followed by required remediation. It 

is recommended that those responsible for building management within the RI guard 

management team conduct a thorough inspection of all water intrusions and take action to 

implement a quality and lasting repair and maintenance program. (Ref. 30) (RAC 3-Health 

(Water Intrusions)) 

Conclusion 

The Readiness Center in Warren is predominately an office / administration operation with few 

industrial hygiene-related issues. It was a privilege to work with MSG . A written 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 171 of 246

Non-Responsive
RI RC Warren Page 7 

July 2012 

Hazard Communication Program should be prepared as well as documentation to show 

compliance with the Personal Protective Equipment hazard assessment and training 

requirements. There was evidence of a history of water intrusion that should be addressed. 

Standard indoor air quality parameters showed temperatures warmer than typically comfortable. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 172 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 174 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 175 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 176 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 177 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 179 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 180 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 181 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 182 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 183 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 184 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 185 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 186 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 187 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 188 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 189 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 190 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 191 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 192 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 193 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 194 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 195 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 196 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 197 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 198 of 246



BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 202 of 246


BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 205 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 206 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 207 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 208 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 209 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 210 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 211 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 212 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 213 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 214 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 215 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 216 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 217 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 218 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 219 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 220 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 221 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 222 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 223 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 224 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 225 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 226 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 227 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 228 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 230 of 246
BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 231 of 246

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 233 of 246




Industrial Hygiene Report

Survey Performed by: Hofman 

Safety & Industrial Hygiene 

Consulting, Inc.

2 Pennwood Road

Lebanon, PA 17042

Phone: 717-304-8876 

Facility: RC - Armory

Building: Armory Warwick

Date of Survey: 20 July 2012

Location: Warwick, RI

Address: 541 Airport Road

Warwick, RI 02886

Phone: 401-275-4420

Draft Report Submitted: 20 April 2013

Comments Received: 29 April 2013

Final Report Submitted: 4 May 2013

POC: MSG 

POC Phone: 

Report submitted to: 

NGB Region North IH Office

301-IH Old Bay Lane

Havre de Grace, MD 21078

Phone: 410-942-0273

State OH Officer: Major 

Bldg P-1 (Medical Section)

1 Minuteman Way

North Kingston, RI 02852

Phone:

Table of Contents 

Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1

Operation Description ....................................................................................................... 1

Chemical and Physical Agents.......................................................................................... 2

Ventilation......................................................................................................................... 3

Noise ................................................................................................................................. 3

Lighting ............................................................................................................................. 3

Personal Protective Equipment & Other Controls ............................................................ 4

Ergonomics ....................................................................................................................... 4

Written Programs .............................................................................................................. 4

Indoor Air Quality............................................................................................................. 5

Other Issues ....................................................................................................................... 7

Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 7

Appendix A – References 

Appendix B – Building Layout 

Appendix C – Photographs 

Appendix D – Vehicle List, Equipment List and Chemical List (None) 

Appendix E – Lab Reports 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 238 of 246

Non-Responsive Non-Responsive Non-Responsive Non-Responsive
RI Armory Warwick Page 1 

July 2012 

Industrial Hygiene Report of Findings 

Rhode Island Army National Guard 

Warwick 

Facility: Armory / Readiness Center 

July 20, 2012 

Executive Summary 

An industrial hygiene evaluation was conducted at the Rhode Island Army National Guard 

Armory / Readiness Center located in Warwick, Rhode Island on July 20, 2012. 

A few issues of minor to moderate concern were identified. There was a 55-gallon drum of a 

chemical in the Storage Building Mechanical Room that could not be readily identified. After 

closer examination it appeared to contain a corrosive. The container would need to be labeled 

and if the chemical is a corrosive, an eyewash / drench shower would be required. All five wipe 

samples for lead contamination were negative. All four samples for asbestos were negative. 

Lighting levels are generally acceptable for work performed, with four areas of low lighting 

identified. There are several confined spaces at the site. A procedure to assure adequate warning 

and safe entry by outside organizations should be prepared, including a list of spaces at the site, 

awareness training on hazards for the Armory workers and application of warning signage. There 

was no site-specific written Hazard Communication Program. There was no site-specific 

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Program and a hazard assessment was not conducted. 

Analysis of site-specific hazards and controls is necessary to comply with regulations. There 

were a few areas of high carbon dioxide levels; this indicates inadequate outdoor air intake. 

While most housekeeping was acceptable, a hot water / mechanical room in the West end of the 

Supply Building was near impossible to enter and a fire extinguisher was blocked. The building 

roof leaks. These water intrusions can lead to a host of health problems associated with mold 

growth and further deterioration of the building structure. Therefore, it was recommended that 

these issues be addressed in a comprehensive fashion and that any future instances be addressed 

promptly. 

Operation Description 

The Warwick Armory (Readiness Center) in Warwick, Rhode Island is a multi-unit, multi-use 

facility. It houses the 43rd and 118th Units and the State Family Program. The functions carried 

out include: planning, logistics, storage, and administration. The family program provides 

counseling and access to services available to military families. Since the family support center 

is open to the public, children do visit the facility. This wing of the building used to house a 

medical facility including exam rooms, x-ray equipment and hearing tests equipment, all of 

which has been removed. 

The facility normally houses approximately 44 workers, 13 of which are civilians working at the 

Family Support Group in the eastern wing of the Armory building. The facility reports 52,025 

square feet (ft2) under roof, which includes the main Armory building (28,961 ft2) and a storage 

building (23,064 ft2), which also houses some other functions including a physical fitness facility 

and locker rooms. The Armory building includes many offices, several training and meeting 

rooms, a kitchen, a boiler room, and a drill floor. It also houses the Tactical Training Operations 

Center (TTOC) which is relatively new. The TTOC used to house an indoor firing range. It was 

reported that the firing range had not been used in 10 years and that a major remediation and 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 239 of 246
RI Armory Warwick Page 2 

July 2012 

cleanup occurred in 2010. Individual Company flammable storage cabinets are located in the 

storage building. The floor diagram can be found in Appendix B. Photographs can be found in 

Appendix C. 

Chemical and Physical Agents 

There are limited chemicals used at the facility which include lubricants for weapons and normal 

housekeeping supplies. The supply clerks have some exposure to predominately sealed 

containers of chemicals, such as weapon cleaning/lubricating fluids. During drill weekends, 

obviously this exposure would be more pronounced. The office and administrative workers have 

exposure to commercial cleaning supplies. 

Two chemical storage cabinets were located in the Storage building, one each in the 43rd and 118th

supply area. Each cabinet had a chemical list and material safety data sheets (MSDS) posted on 

the cabinets. Chemicals were labeled and stored in designated areas and flammable storage 

cabinets. 

Five wipe samples of 100 square centimeters were taken on the day of the assessment. Since this 

facility used to contain a firing range and since it was known that children visit the facility, some 

additional samples were taken in the family support area. Wipe samples were collected using 

Ghost-Wipe sample media and analyzed for lead by AMA Analytical Services, Inc., an American 

Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Accredited laboratory. Results are reported in micrograms 

per square foot (μg/ft2). (Ref 36) Lead was not detected in any of the wipe samples collected (see 

Table A.) 

Table A – Wipe Sampling Results 

Sample No. Location Lead 

μg/ft2

WAR ARM W52 On Top of Refrigerator in 43rd Supply Room < 110

WAR ARM W53 On Top of Electrical Box – TTOC Electronics < 110

WAR ARM W54 Break Room On Top of Electric Box - TTOC < 110

WAR ARM W57 On Top of Refrigerator in Family Support Break Room < 110

WAR ARM W58 On Top of Bookcase in Family Support Room 123 < 110

WAR ARM W59 Blank - Reporting Limit – per clean wipe < 12 μg 

OSHA/HUD Decontamination Level 200

 ND = none detected

Sample Media: Ghost Wipes < = less than or equal to the number shown

μg/ft2= micrograms per square foot μg = micrograms 

Four bulk samples were collected and analyzed for percentage of asbestos by ALM Analytical 

Services, Inc., an AIHA Accredited laboratory. Bulk samples of hot water pipe insulation were 

collected in the Supply Building mechanical room. Bulk samples of floor tile and floor tile 

mastic were collected from the Supply Building hallway. There was no asbestos detected in any 

sample (see Table B.) 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 240 of 246
RI Armory Warwick Page 3 

July 2012 

Table B – Bulk Asbestos Sample Results 

Sample No. Location Asbestos

%

WAR ARM B50 Hot Water Pipe Insulation – Front Supply W None Detected

WAR ARM B51 Hot Water Pipe Insulation – Rear Supply W None Detected

WAR ARM B55 Floor Tile – Supply Building Hallway None Detected

WAR ARM B56 Floor Tile Mastic – Supply Building Hallway None Detected

A 55 gallon drum of some material, believed to be Borax, showing a corrosive warning, was 

identified in the Mechanical Room for the Supply Building. The label was badly deteriorated and 

could not be read. All chemicals must have legible identification and display hazard warnings for 

proper personal protection and control. The reference for this is OSHA’s Hazard Communication 

Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200.) RAC 3 - Health (Chemical Labeling) In addition, based on 

what this is used for and how often, 55 gallons may be an excessive amount of chemical to be 

kept in the mechanical room. Facilities management would need to investigate and make a 

determination, including whether secondary containment would be needed. Also, if this is in fact 

a corrosive substance, an eye wash / drench shower would be required per OSHA regulations at 

29 CFR 1910.151(c). RAC 3 - Health (Eye Wash)

Ventilation 

There were no vehicle exhausts, battery charging rooms, or welding or paint booth ventilation 

systems to measure in the Warwick Armory. The kitchen was clean and used for food set up, but 

not typically for cooking. Additional information on ventilation can be found on Page 5 under 

Indoor Air Quality. 

Noise

Full-shift noise dosimetry was not conducted since there were no activities that generate high 

noise levels. Workers in the supply, training and office areas did not use pneumatic tools or 

discharge weapons or operate vehicles or equipment that would generate excessive noise levels. 

Lighting

A lighting survey of the facility was conducted and four areas were found to be insufficient for 

the work performed: the Drill/Assembly Floor, Boiler Room, an office, and Gym. (Ref. 8)

(RAC 4 – Safety (Illumination)). Survey results can be found in Table C. The time of day was 

afternoon, and there was minimal light filtering in through the windows since it had been 

cloudy/raining all day. In the Drill/Assembly floor the lighting measurement was 23 footcandles (fc); the Gym was 13 foot-candles (fc); the Boiler Room was 18 fc; and an office (Room 

309) was 28 fc. The standard for lighting in all four areas is 30 fc. All other areas were adequate 

for the work performed. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 241 of 246
RI Armory Warwick Page 4 

July 2012 

Table C - Lighting Survey Results 

Location of Measurement Foot Candles Standard (Ref. 8)

Armory – Main Building

Room 173 - Office 39 30

Room 168 - Office 48 30

Classroom NW – sectional classroom 45 30

Kitchen 59 50

Drill/Assembly Floor 23 30

Tactical Training Operations Center (TTOC) 90 30

Room 120 – Family Assist Office 65 30

Room 130– Family Assist Office 43 30

Room 123– Family Assist Office 37 30

S-3 Section Room 110 49 30

S-1 Section Room 118 MP 30 30

BDE Conference Room (1055) 42 30

Boiler Room 18 30

Armory – Supply Building

Room 309 (Room 1007 on drawing) 28 30

43rd Supply Office 40 30

118th Supply Office 45 30

Gym 13 30

Reference for lighting standards is the American National Standards Institute, Inc. / Illuminating 

Engineering Society of North America, RP-7-01, Lighting Industrial Facilities, 2001. Shaded 

areas do not meet the light standard requirements. Area measurements were taken approximately 

4 1⁄2 feet from floor level; measurements taken at desks were approximately 30 inches from floor 

level. 

Personal Protective Equipment & Other Controls 

As this is a readiness center / office setting, there is little need for Personal Protective Equipment 

(PPE.) There is some PPE located in the supply areas for chemical handling around the 

flammable cabinets. Cleaning is performed by the Guard members and there is some PPE in the 

supply closet. Some general comments on PPE are addressed under “Written Programs” below. 

There was an eyewash station located in the 43rd supply area. 

Ergonomics 

A few of the workers at this facility may have some ergonomic risks from lifting supplies and 

equipment. This would mostly be in the supply building. Computer stations have been set up 

with attention to ergonomic concerns. There were few ergonomic concerns seen in other duties at 

the facility. 

Written Programs 

1. Confined Spaces (29 CFR 1910.146) – There are several confined spaces on site. These 

include: a vault leading to 6000 gallon fuel oil tank, and a pit/vault in the Boiler Room. Photo 

included in Appendix C. There is no written site-specific Confined Space Program. While it 

is unlikely that Guard members at this Armory would enter these spaces, the risks remain. 

Since the confined spaces are on the National Guard property, and since the spaces are under 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 242 of 246
RI Armory Warwick Page 5 

July 2012 

the control of the Armory, a “procedure” should be established to assure any entry by “other” 

groups can be conducted safely. At a minimum, it is recommended that Armory employees 

be provided with awareness training and that all the spaces be labeled per OSHA regulations 

at 29 CFR 1910.146. (Ref. 16) (The RI Occupational Health Office has prepared a written 

Confined Space Program dated 6 March 2012 that could be implemented assuming proper 

training and equipment, e.g., real-time air monitoring meters, are available. However, it 

should be noted that no confined space permit form or checklist was included in this 

document.) 29 CFR 1910.146. (Ref. 16) (RAC 3 – Safety & Health (Signage & Written 

Confined Space Program or Procedure)) 

2. Hearing Conservation (29 CFR 1910.95 and DA PAM 40-501) – There did not appear to be 

any noise issues at this facility, therefore, a Hearing Conservation Program would not 

normally be required. (See additional comments below.) 

3. Respiratory Protection (29 CFR 1910.134) – There did not appear to be any air contaminants 

requiring use of respiratory protection. At most, filtering facepiece respirators may be used 

for clean-up. This would require provision of Voluntary Use per OSHA regulations at 29 

CFR 1910.134. See further discussion below. 

4. HAZCOM (29 CFR 1910.1200) - There is no site-specific written Hazard Communication 

Program available at the facility. The safety manual dated 15 March 1996 does contain a 

Hazard Communication Program that could be used by the Armory. Chemical lists and 

MSDSs are available, typically associated with the flammable storage cabinets for each Unit. 

A full chemical vs. MSDS audit was not conducted during this evaluation. A spot check of 

chemicals showed labeling in compliance, with a few exceptions and a recommendation as

noted above under Chemical Agents. Note: A new Hazard Communication rule was 

published by OSHA on March 26, 2012. This rule will require re-training of all workers by 

December 2013, notably for the new labeling and new Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) 

requirements which will replace the old MSDS system. It is recommended that a site-specific 

hazard communication written program be prepared or updated, including training elements, 

to comply with the new regulation. Since Guard members are charged with building 

cleaning, cleaning chemicals should be included in this training. (Ref. 20) (RAC 4– Health 

(Hazard Communication))

5. PPE (29 CFR 1910.132) - A site-specific written Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 

Program was not provided. However, the safety manual dated 15 March 1996 does have 

elements of a general program that could be used by the Armory if hazard assessments were 

performed. While the Armory does not perform many tasks that would require PPE, the few 

tasks that may require PPE, namely the workers involved in supply and logistics and the 

cleaning crews, should be protected by conducting the required hazard assessments and 

training. Such activities should be documented. (Ref. 21) (RAC 4 – Health (PPE)) 

6. Other: The facility did have a copy of Army Regulation 385-10, dated 12 September 2008. 

Indoor Air Quality 

The indoor air quality (IAQ) carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations were above the recommended 

IAQ parameter in a few areas. The recommended maximum CO2 concentration is 993 parts of 

chemical to million parts of air (ppm) (700 ppm greater than the outdoor background level) 

based on outdoor air levels of 293 ppm. Results can be found in Table D. High CO2

concentrations indicate that there is not enough outside air entering the room for the population 

in the room. CO2 concentrations ranged from 1060 ppm to 1355 ppm in the S-3 Section, and the 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 243 of 246
RI Armory Warwick Page 6 

July 2012 

Family Assistance Offices Rooms 120, 130, and 123. (Ref. 6) RAC 3 - Health (Indoor Air 

Quality).

Carbon Monoxide (CO) was not identified during this survey. 

The indoor air quality parameters temperature and relative humidity were within acceptable 

ranges in the Warwick Armory. Results can be found in Table D. Comfort guidelines would 

indicate that at 60% relative humidity, an operative temperature in the range of 72° F to 78° F 

would be acceptable for most individuals. At 50% relative humidity the acceptable operative 

temperature range would be 76° F to 83° F (Ref 35). 

The outside temperature was 66° F and the relative humidity was 82%. The sky overcast and it 

was raining. 

Table D – Indoor Air Quality Survey Results 

Location of Measurement Temperature

Degrees

Fahrenheit 

oF

Relative 

Humidity

Percent

%

Carbon 

Dioxide

ppm

Carbon 

Monoxide

ppm

Outside 66 82 293 0

Armory – Main Building

Room 173 - Office 69 54 662 0

Room 168 - Office 68 61 486 0

Classroom NW – sectional classroom 68 63 561 0

Kitchen 69 64 607 0

Drill/Assembly Floor 72 66 574 0

Tactical Training Operations Center 

(TTOC) 

72 43 632 0

Room 120 – Family Assist Office 75 55 1068 0

Room 130– Family Assist Office 76 53 1073 0

Room 123– Family Assist Office 76 54 1355 0

S-3 Section Room 110 73 53 1060 0

S-1 Section Room 118 MP 72 54 980 0

BDE Conference Room (1055) 71 54 503 0

Boiler Room 75 57 473 0

Armory – Supply Building

Room 309 (Room 1007 on drawing) 74 66 329 0

43rd Supply Office 75 58 445 0

118th Supply Office 71 63 520 0

Gym 75 67 403 0

Maximum Acceptable Guideline Levels 72 – 78 @ 

60% RH

< 60% 993 9

Shaded areas do not meet an indoor air quality parameter. The references for this are: The 

American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 

Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy – Standard 55-2010 and Ventilation for 

Acceptable Indoor Air Quality Standard 62.1 - 2010.

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 244 of 246
RI Armory Warwick Page 7 

July 2012 

Other Issues 

Housekeeping – Housekeeping was in good condition in most areas. The exception was a 

mechanical room on the West end of the Supply Building. The room could not be entered 

without climbing over miscellaneous materials and the fire extinguisher was inaccessible. Photo 

included in Appendix C. RAC 3 - Safety – Housekeeping The reference for this is the OSHA 

regulations at 29 CFR1910.22 and 1910.157(c). Ref. 15 

Building Issues – It is estimated that this building was built in the late 1950s or early 1960s. The 

roof was replaced about 4 years ago. However, the roof still leaks in some spots. Buckets are in 

place to collect leakage in the rooms. Photos are presented in Appendix C. There have been no 

complaints of mold or indoor air quality complaints. Water intrusions are problematic for mold 

growth. In addition to possible health effects, water intrusions are also long term maintenance 

and possibly structural decay issues. Typically, it will be much less costly to prevent or fix any 

water intrusions as they occur, rather than letting the issue fester and provide an opportunity for 

mold growth followed by required remediation. It is recommended that those responsible for 

building maintenance within the RI guard management team conduct a thorough inspection of all 

water intrusions and take action to implement a quality and lasting repair and maintenance 

program. (Ref. 30) RAC 3 - Health (Water Intrusions) 

Airport Noise: There was a minor complaint on airport noise. Several hangars and airport 

operations are directly across the street from the Armory. 

Conclusion 

The Armory in Warwick is a multi-use, multi-unit facility with a main Armory building and an 

additional storage building. Workers assigned to this building appeared to be safety conscious 

with no instances of risky behavior noted. It was a privilege to work with MSG and his 

people. 

A few issues of minor to moderate concern were identified. There was a 55-gallon drum of a 

chemical in the Storage Building Mechanical Room that could not be readily identified. After 

closer examination it appeared to contain a corrosive. The container would need to be labeled 

and if the chemical is a corrosive, an eyewash / drench shower would be required per regulations 

of the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA.) All five wipe samples for lead 

contamination were negative. All four samples for asbestos were negative. Lighting levels are 

generally acceptable for work performed, with four areas of low lighting identified. There are 

several confined spaces at the site. A procedure to assure adequate warning and safe entry by 

outside organizations should be prepared, including a list of spaces at the site, awareness training 

on hazards for the workers and application of warning signage. There was no site-specific 

written Hazard Communication Program. There was no site-specific Personal Protective 

Equipment (PPE) Program and a hazard assessment was not conducted. Analysis of site-specific 

hazards and controls is necessary to comply with regulations. There were a few areas of high 

carbon dioxide levels; this indicates inadequate outdoor air intake. While most housekeeping was 

acceptable, a hot water / mechanical room in the West end of the Supply Building was near 

impossible to enter and a fire extinguisher was blocked. The building roof leaks. The 

maintenance of the facility is shared by the RI Guard and its State agency partners. These water 

intrusions can lead to a host of health problems associated with mold growth and further 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 245 of 246

Non-Responsive
RI Armory Warwick Page 8 

July 2012 

deterioration of the building structure. Therefore, it was recommended that these issues be 

addressed in a comprehensive fashion and that any future instances be addressed promptly. 

BEST AVAILABLE COPY BEST AVAILABLE COPY FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0085 (RI) 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 246 of 246