alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 66 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 66

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2021

   Mr. Burchett submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has served three terms as a 
Representative shall be eligible for election to the House of 
Representatives. For purposes of this section, the election of a person 
to fill a vacancy in the House of Representatives shall be included as 
one term in determining the number of terms that such person has served 
as a Representative if the person fills the vacancy for more than one 
year.
    ``Section 2. No person who has served two terms as a Senator shall 
be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of 
this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy 
in the Senate shall be included as one term in determining the number 
of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills 
the vacancy for more than three years.
    ``Section 3. This article shall not apply to any person serving a 
term as a Member of Congress on the date of the ratification of this 
article.''.
                                 <all>
```
Supreme Court of Texas

══════════

No. 23-0032

══════════

Weekley Homes, LLC,

Petitioner,

v.

John Paniagua; and Hermelinda Maravilla Corona,

Jose Camerino Maravilla, Sr., and Margarita Maravilla,

Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of 

Jose Camerino Maravilla, Deceased, et al.,

Respondents

═══════════════════════════════════════

On Petition for Review from the

Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas

═══════════════════════════════════════

JUDGMENT

THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS, having heard this cause on petition for 

review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District, and having considered the 

appellate record and counsels’ briefs, but without hearing oral argument under Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, concludes that the court of appeals’ judgment 

should be reversed in part.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, in accordance with the Court’s opinion, that:

1) The portion of the court of appeals’ judgment reversing the trial court’s 

judgment as to Respondents’ negligence and premises-liability claims is

reversed;

2) The case is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings; 

and

3) Petitioner shall recover, and Respondents shall pay, the costs incurred 

by Petitioner in this Court.
Copies of this judgment and the Court’s opinion are certified to the Court of 

Appeals for the Fifth District and the 298th District Court of Dallas County, Texas,

for observance.

Opinion of the Court delivered Per Curiam.

June 21, 2024

**********
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                  5

       
<S>                                    <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       488,899
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,656,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                1,489,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           3,981,887
<PP&E>                                       786,438
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,977,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             7,273,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,002,443
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      29,054
<OTHER-SE>                                   427,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               7,273,095
<SALES>                                   11,207,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          11,207,858
<CGS>                                      8,026,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              8,026,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (664,142)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (5,470,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (58,801)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (5,529,562)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (5,852,382)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0

        

    

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 4, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60912

Summary Calendar

 

JIMMY HARRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et. al, Defendants,

MICHELLE D. EUBANKS, Director of Inmate Legal Assistance Program

at Southern Mississippi Correctional Institute; JOHNNIE DENMARK,

Deputy Warden of Southern Mississippi Correctional Institute;

AUCHOR DAVIS, Chief Correctional Officer at Southern Mississippi

Correctional Institute; GLORIA WEST, Lieutenant Correctional

Officers at Southern Mississippi Correctional Institute; BRENDA

SIMS, Lieutenant Correctional Officers of Southern Mississippi

Correctional Institute; DAN MCLEOD, Sergeant at Southern

Mississippi Correctional Institute; REGINA HANCOCK,

Classification Officer at Southern Mississippi Correctional

Institute; FLORENCE JONES, Classification Officer at Southern

Mississippi Correctional Institute; JIMMY PEARCE, Disciplinary

Chairperson/Hearing Officer at Southern Mississippi Correctional

Institute; C. DAVID TURNER, Superintendent of Southern

Mississippi Correctional Institute; ROBERT L. JOHNSON,

COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:01-CV-272-PG

--------------------

Before JOLLY, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*
No. 03-60912

-2-

Jimmy Harris filed a civil rights action against the State

of Mississippi and numerous individual defendants. The parties 

consented to adjudication by a magistrate judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Harris noticed an appeal from two orders

issued by the magistrate judge: (1) an order refusing to

reconsider a previous order denying leave to file an amended

complaint, and (2) an order denying class certification. 

The parties dispute whether this court enjoys jurisdiction. 

As a court of limited jurisdiction, this court has authority to

hear appeals only from “final decisions” under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

interlocutory decisions under 28 U.S.C. § 1292, nonfinal

judgments certified as final under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 54(b), or some other nonfinal order or judgment to

which an exception applies. See Briargrove Shopping Center Joint

Venture v. Pilgrim Enter., Inc., 170 F.3d 536, 538 (5th Cir.

1999). 

The orders appealed from are not final decisions under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, see Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463,

467 (1978); Click v. Abilene Nat. Bank, 822 F.2d 544, 545 (5th

Cir. 1987), and we can discern no basis for appellate

jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1298 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1298

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, as the ``Technical 
            Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL SERGEANT MARSHAL ROBERTS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Technical Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Technical 
Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1298

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, as the ``Technical 
            Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office Building''.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

August 19, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00371

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF L.M., ET AL CHILDREN

From the 131st Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- PA

- 02077 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R
After this court advised court reporter Elva G. Chapa that the reporter’s record was late, she filed a notification of late reporter’s record. She indicated her other duties preclude her from working on the record, and she expects to file the record by August 21, 2020

. The reporter’s motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record is GRA NTED. The reporter’s record is due on August 21, 2020

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an accelerated appeal to ten days). The child’s “need for permanence is the paramount consideration for the child’s present and future physical and emotional needs.” See Dupree v. Tex

. Dep ’ t of Protective & Regulatory Servs

. , 907 S.W.2d 81, 87 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1995, no writ) . This court must render its decision “with the least possible delay,” and any further delays in obtaining the reporter’s record will hinder this court in its duty. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3 (c); In re J.L. , 163 S.W.3d 79, 82 (Tex. 2005) (quoting T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 263.405(a))

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of August, 2020

.___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
# Euroopa Liidu C 134A/3. m

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 134A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 57. köide3. mai 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 134A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

57. köide3. mai 2014

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Parandused |
| 2014/C 134A/01 | Parandus, mis käsitleb teadet avaliku konkursi — EPSO/AD/278/14 – Administraatorid (AD 7) korraldamise kohta järgmistes valdkondades: 1. digitaalkriminalistika 2. operatiivanalüüs — (Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 88 A, 27. märts 2014) | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

Parandused

2014/C 134A/01

Parandus, mis käsitleb teadet avaliku konkursi — EPSO/AD/278/14 – Administraatorid (AD 7) korraldamise kohta järgmistes valdkondades: 1. digitaalkriminalistika 2. operatiivanalüüs — (Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 88 A, 27. märts 2014)

(Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 88 A, 27. märts 2014)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 134A/02 | Ülevaade ELT C-seeria A-osas avaldatud konkursiteadetest | 2 |

2014/C 134A/02

Ülevaade ELT C-seeria A-osas avaldatud konkursiteadetest

2

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

Parandused

| 3.5.2014 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2014

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 134/1

---

Parandus, mis käsitleb teadet avaliku konkursi

EPSO/AD/278/14 – ADMINISTRAATORID (AD 7)

korraldamise kohta järgmistes valdkondades:

| 1. | DIGITAALKRIMINALISTIKA |
| --- | --- |

1.

DIGITAALKRIMINALISTIKA

| 2. | OPERATIIVANALÜÜS |
| --- | --- |

2.

OPERATIIVANALÜÜS

(
  Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 88 A, 27. märts 2014
  )

2014/C 134 A/01

Leheküljel 7 VIII jaotise punktis 1

asendatakse

„Lõpptähtaeg (sealhulgas kandideerimisavalduse kinnitamise jaoks): 29. aprill 2014 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi.”

järgmisega:

„Lõpptähtaeg (sealhulgas kandideerimisavalduse kinnitamise jaoks): 6. mai 2014 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi.”

---

3.5.2014

| 3.5.2014 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 134/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 134/2

---

ÜLEVAADE ELT C-SEERIA A-OSAS AVALDATUD KONKURSITEADETEST

2014/C 134 A/02

Allpool on esitatud loetelu käesoleva aasta C-seeria A-osas avaldatust.

Kui ei ole märgitud teisiti, on ELTd trükitud kõigis keeltes.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                        525
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,692
<PP&E>                                          11,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              819
<BONDS>                                          8,283
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,422
<OTHER-SE>                                       (358)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,313
<SALES>                                          7,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,016
<CGS>                                            5,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (18)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (601)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (222)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (379)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (379)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
PROTOCOL SYSTEMS, INC.

                        AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

PARTIES:    Protocol Systems, Inc. ("Company")
            8500 SW Creekside Place
            Beaverton, OR 97008

            Carl P. Holstein ("Executive")
            10880 SW Avocet Court
            Beaverton, OR 97007

DATE: March 1, 2000

                                        RECITALS:

     A.    The Company and the Executive have entered into an Executive
Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 1998 (the "Employment Agreement").

     B.    The Company and the Executive now desire to modify certain
provisions of the Employment Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

     1.    Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein have their
defined meanings as set forth in the Employment Agreement.

     2.    Section 2.3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety as follows:

     2.3 TERM. This Agreement shall remain in effect until the earlier of
     (i) termination pursuant to Article 4 or Article 6 of this Agreement or
     (ii) three (3) years from the date of this Agreement, provided however
     that if a Change of Control occurs within three (3) years from the date of
     this Agreement, then this Agreement shall remain in effect for two (2)
     years from the date of the first Change of Control event described in
     Section 6.1.1.

     3.    Section 6.2.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety as follows:

     6.2.1 Change of Control Termination Payment.  In the event of a Change of
     Control Termination as defined in Section 6.1.2, without further action by
     the Board, the Company shall, within thirty (30) days of such termination,
     make a lump sum payment to the Executive, equal to two (2) years' Base
     Salary.

     4.    Section 6.5 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety as follows:

     6.5 Vesting of Stock Options. All unvested stock options held by
     Executive, if any, shall vest immediately upon a Change of Control
     Termination as defined in Section 6.1.2. Executive may exercise such
     options in accordance with the terms and conditions of the stock option
     plan and the agreement pursuant to which such options were granted.

     5.    Except as set forth and amended and restated herein, the Employment
Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to Executive
Employment Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first written
above.

EXECUTIVE                                 PROTOCOL SYSTEMS, INC.


____________________________________      By:___________________________________
Carl P. Holstein                          Title:________________________________
James JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3483

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 5, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Damoorgian and Forst, JJ., concur.
Fortunato CALABRO, Jr., Appellant, v. Patricia CALABRO, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1371

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      24.4**





STATE
      OF
      ARKANSAS       §


COUNTY
      OF
      BENTON          §





POWER
      OF
      ATTORNEY





Know
      all
      men by these presents, that I, WILLIAM A. SWANSTON, a Director of AMERICA’S
      CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint TILMAN J.
      FALGOUT, III and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
      with
      full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007
      and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National
      Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto
      and
      other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
      stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,
      incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, hereby
      ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute
      or
      substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





In
      witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 13th day of
      July,
      2007.








/s/
      William A.
      Swanston


WILLIAM
      A. SWANSTON











ACKNOWLEDGMENT





Before
      me
      this 13th day
      of July, 2007, came WILLIAM A. SWANSTON, personally known to me, who in my
      presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and
      acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.








/s/
      Camille A.
      Hector


NOTARY
      PUBLIC
Demetrius Laredo WALKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4490

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 01, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.