alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF TAPISTRON  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.,  FOR THE TWELVE MONTH
PERIOD  ENDED JULY 31,  1996,  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                          17
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40
<INVENTORY>                                  2,082  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,840
<PP&E>                                       1,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                 808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,756
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         4
<OTHER-SE>                                     652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,017
<SALES>                                      1,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,305
<CGS>                                        1,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             289    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,478)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                420
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,478)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.45)


        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUCIO ERNESTO GOMEZALVARENGA,

Petitioner,

 v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent.

No. 14-70603

Agency No. A095-140-956

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 9, 2017

Pasadena, California

Before: WALLACE, CHRISTEN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) did not abuse its discretion in

denying Lucio Gomez-Alvarenga’s motion to reopen his proceedings or to

reconsider his prior motion to remand to the immigration judge.

FILED

MAY 23 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Page 2 of 2

Both motions to reopen and motions to remand must establish a prima facie

showing of eligibility for the underlying relief sought in order to be granted. 

Ramirez-Munoz v. Lynch, 816 F.3d 1226, 1228 (9th Cir. 2016); Angov v. Lynch,

788 F.3d 893, 897 (9th Cir. 2015). For Gomez-Alvarenga to be eligible for

temporary protected status, his felony conviction barring that relief under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1254a(c)(2)(B) must have been vacated for reasons related to the merits of the

underlying criminal proceedings, as opposed to rehabilitative or immigration

reasons. See Matter of Marroquin-Garcia, 23 I. & N. Dec. 705, 713 (A.G. 2005). 

Yet neither Gomez-Alvarenga’s motion to reopen nor his motion to remand alleged

that his felony conviction was vacated for reasons related to the merits of the

underlying criminal proceedings. The BIA could not be expected to infer that

allegation from his newly submitted evidence, which indicates only that the

conviction was vacated in furtherance of justice under California Penal Code

§ 1385, a provision encompassing a broad range of reasons for relief. See People

v. Superior Court (Romero), 917 P.2d 628, 648 (Cal. 1996). Gomez-Alvarenga’s

motion to reopen and his motion to remand thus failed to make a prima facie

showing that he is entitled to the underlying relief sought.

PETITION DENIED.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Rentrak Corporation:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  following  registration
statements: (1) Registration Statement File No. 33-40472 on Form S-8 of the 1986
Stock  Option  Plan,  the 1985  Stock  Incentive  Plan,  the  1985 Key  Employee
Incentive Stock Option Plan and the Individual  Written  Compensation Plan Dated
May 10, 1991, (2)  Registration  Statement File No.  33-44864 on Form S-8 of the
1986  Restated and Amended  Stock Option Plan and  Directors'  Stock Option Plan
dated  January  8,  1992,  (3)  Registration  Statement  on Form S-8 of the 1992
Employee  Stock Purchase Plan dated June 16, 1992,  (4)  Registration  Statement
File  No.  33-86548  on Form S-3  dated  November  21,  1994,  (5)  Registration
Statement  File No.  33-65463 on Form S-3 dated December 28, 1995, as amended on
Feburary 9, 1996, (6)  Registration  Statement File No. 333-28565 on Form S-8 of
the 1997  Non-Officer  Employee Stock Option Plan dated June 5, 1997, as amended
on October 29, 1997, and (7)  Registration  Statement File No. 333-62523 on Form
S-8 of the 1997 Equity Participation Plan dated August 31, 1998, on Form 10-K of
Rentrak  Corporation  of our report  dated May 24, 2002 (except as to the second
paragraph  of  Note  5,  which  is as of  May  30,  2002)  with  respect  to the
consolidated  balance sheet of Rentrak  Corporation and subsidiaries as of March
31, 2002 and the related  consolidated  statement of  operations,  stockholders'
equity,  and cash  flows for the year  ended  March 31,  2002,  and the  related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 2002, annual
report on Form 10-K of Rentrak Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP
------------


Portland, Oregon
June 28, 2002
Thomas H. STAUCH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3126

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 13, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
EX PARTE Darryl Elton SCOTT

CR-14-1366

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
David W. PRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3591

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1395 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 22, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

to discount FHA single-family mortgage insurance premium payments for first-time homebuyers who complete 

a financial literacy housing counseling program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1395 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing Financial Lit3 eracy Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DISCOUNT ON MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM 

5 PAYMENTS FOR FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS 

6 WHO COMPLETE FINANCIAL LITERACY HOUS7 ING COUNSELING PROGRAMS. 

8 The second sentence of subparagraph (A) of section 

9 203(c)(2) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 

10 1709(c)(2)(A)) is amended— 

11 (1) by inserting before the comma the following: 

12 ‘‘and such program is completed before the mort13 gagor has signed an application for a mortgage to 

14 be insured under this title or a sales agreement’’; 

15 and 

16 (2) by striking ‘‘not exceed 2.75 percent of the 

17 amount of the original insured principal obligation of 

18 the mortgage’’ and inserting ‘‘be 25 basis points 

19 lower than the premium payment amount estab20 lished by the Secretary under the first sentence of 

21 this subparagraph’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 20, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
WKTK-FM&WSKY-F M 360 0 N W 4 3 Street , Suit e B Galnsfivitle . Florid a 3260 6 Phon e {352 ) 377-098 5 Fa x (352 ) 377-188 4 Augus t

26 , 201 0

- • •'•• • " I \i; : 3 Aloh aLe y Associat e Directo r Smal l Communit

y Ai r Sei'vic e Developineit

t Program aloha , lev@dot.go v Re : Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Development

Grant Dea r Ms . Ley : WKT K an d WSK

Y full y support s th e Gainesville-Alachu aCount y Regiona l Airpor t Authority' s reques t

fo r aSmaJ l Communit

y Ai r Servic e developmen t

gran t t o hel p suppor

t th e ne w American Eagl e Airline s servic e betwee n Gainesvill e an d Miami an d th e existin g local ai r

carriers , Delt aAi

r Line s an d U S Ainvays , We recogniz e th e importanc e o f ai r sei'vic e t o economi c developmen t

an d th e qualit

y o f lif e fo r resident s an d visitor s i

n ou r region . We wan t t o hel p ensure th e succes s o f th e ne w American Airline s servic e betwee n Gainesvill e an d th e Miam i hub . We ar e alread y workin g closel y wit h th e Airport

Authorit y an d matchin g ftmds spent . Th e lac k o f air sei'vic e to Sout h Florid aan d adequate connectin g servic e to international destination s ha s force d many t o commute t o an d fro mother airport s o r

mak e th e exhaustin g 5 + hour

tri p to Miami b y automobile . Additionally , American' s extensiv e domesti c an d international rout e structure fro mMiam i will provid e ne w trave l option s an d agreater leve l o f frequency . Du e t o th e critica l importanc e o f qualit y air servic e for

ou r region , w e are committe d t o supportin g American' s new servic e an d continue d improvemen t

i n ai r service . Therefore , w e wil l matc h fund s spent wit h WKTK an d WSKY to hel p America n Airline s establis h it s ne w route betwee n GN

V an d MIA . Wit

h 179,00 0 listeners , w e believ e ou r donatio n fo

r advertisin g wil l hel p make th e ne w servic e successful . I urg e yo u t o procee d wit

h approvin g th e Airpor

t Authority' s reques t

fo r a grant t o assis t with marketin g effort s fo r th e nex t tw o years . I f

yo u hav e an

y question s abou t

ou r stations , pleas e fee

l fre e t o contac t

me . M y direc t lin e i s 352-244-5714 . Sincerely , Willia mE . Morri s Senio r Manager

Pag e 6 4
# Euroopan unionin C 164A/29.

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 164A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 57. vuosikerta29. toukokuu 2014 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 164A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

57. vuosikerta29. toukokuu 2014

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Euroopan keskuspankki |
| 2014/C 164A/01 | EKP pidentää määräaikaa, johon mennessä oikaisulautakunnan jäsenyyshakemukset on toimitettava | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan keskuspankki

2014/C 164A/01

EKP pidentää määräaikaa, johon mennessä oikaisulautakunnan jäsenyyshakemukset on toimitettava

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 164A/02 | Luettelo EUVL:n C A -sarjassa julkaistuista kilpailuista | 2 |

2014/C 164A/02

Luettelo EUVL:n C A -sarjassa julkaistuista kilpailuista

2

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan keskuspankki

| 29.5.2014 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 164/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2014

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 164/1

---

EKP pidentää määräaikaa, johon mennessä oikaisulautakunnan jäsenyyshakemukset on toimitettava

2014/C 164 A/01

EKP ilmoittaa pidentävänsä 2. kesäkuuta 2014 saakka määräaikaa, johon mennessä hakijoiden on toimitettava hakemuksensa Euroopan unionin virallisessa lehdessä1. toukokuuta 2014 (1) julkaistuun kiinnostuksenilmaisupyyntöön ulkopuolisten asiantuntijoiden nimittämisestä jäseniksi ja varajäseniksi Euroopan keskuspankin oikaisulautakuntaan (Frankfurt am Main, Saksa).

Frankfurt am Mainissa 23 päivänä toukokuuta 2014.

---

(1)  EUVL C 133 A, 1.5.2014, s. 1.

---

29.5.2014

| 29.5.2014 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 164/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 164/2

---

LUETTELO EUVL:N C A -SARJASSA JULKAISTUISTA KILPAILUISTA

2014/C 164 A/02

Jäljempänä luettelo kuluvana vuonna julkaistuista C A -lehdistä.

Mikäli toisin ei mainita, EUVL on julkaistu kaikkina kieliversioina.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

---
Exhibit 10.6

Audit Committee Charter

The
audit committee is a committee of members of the board of directors of Environmental Remediation Holding Corporation ("ERHC"). Its primary function is to assist the board in
fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial information, which will be provided to the shareholders and others, the systems of internal controls which management and the board
of directors have established, and the audit process.

In
meeting its responsibilities, the audit committee is expected to:



---



Audit
committee members and the committee chairman shall be designated by the full board of directors.

The
duties and responsibilities of a member of the audit committee are in addition to those duties set out for a member of the board of directors.

---

QuickLinks
Albert GENDRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3985

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PowerSecure International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  November 4, 2010
    /s/ Sidney HintonSidney HintonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Ben L. DORTCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3737

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 13, 2018

Ben L. Dortch, Chipley, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                       pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        ----------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, I, Gary C. Parks, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.

                        /s/ Gary C. Parks
                        ---------------------------------
                       Name:  Gary C. Parks
                       Title: Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial
                              Officer
                              (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
                       Date:  August 14, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

ST A TE OF OHIO EX REL. MICHAEL 

DEWINE, OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 

CASE NO. 3:18cv142 

Plaintiff, 

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE 

v. 

GLOBE MOTORS, INC. 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

It is hereby ordered that the above captioned cause be administratively processed. 1 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

1 Settled in principle. Final paperwork being drafted. 

Case: 3:18-cv-00142-WHR Doc #: 63 Filed: 09/30/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 942
#### LAROE ESTATES, INC., Movant-Appellant, v. TOWN OF CHESTER, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-1086-cv

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 25, 2017

FOR APPELLANT: Joseph J. Haspel, Joseph J. Haspel, PLLC, Goshen, NY.

FOR APPELLEE: Anthony F. Cardoso (Steven C. Stern, on the brief), Sokoloff Stern LLP, Carle Place, NY.

PRESENT: GUIDO CALABRESI, GERARD E. LYNCH, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,. Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Following our July 6, 2016 decision in Laroe Estates, Inc. v. Town of Chester, 828 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2016), the Town of Chester appealed to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court vacated this Court’s judgment in favor of Laroe Estates (“Laroe”) and remanded the case for further proceedings. Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc., — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1645, 198 L.Ed.2d 64 (2017). The Supreme Court held that “an intervenor of right must have Article III standing in order to pursue relief that is different from that which is sought by a party with standing.” Id. at 1651. In the present case, the Supreme Court determined, “[i]t is unclear whether Laroe seeks the same relief as Sherman or instead seeks different relief, such as a money judgment against the Town in Laroe’s own name,” id., or “whether Laroe believes the Town is directly liable to Sherman or Laroe for the taking,” id. at 1652 (quotation marks omitted). “This confusion,” the Supreme Court instructed, “needs to be dispelled. If Laroe wants only a money judgment of its *70own running directly against the Town, then it seeks damages different from those sought by Sherman and must establish its own Article III standing in order to intervene. We leave it to the Court of Appeals to address this question on remand.” Id.

Because resolving the ambiguity identified by the Supreme Court is likely to require a factual inquiry that this Court lacks the institutional capacity to perform, we now remand to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to consider “whether Laro'e seeks the same relief as Sherman or instead seeks different relief, such as a money judgment against the Town in Laroe’s own name,” id. at 1651, and, if the latter, whether it can “establish its own Article III standing” in order to be able to seek that relief, id. at 1652.

Depending on the findings and rulings it makes in considering these questions, the District Court may enter such orders and conduct such further proceedings as the District Court deems appropriate, Any further appeal in this case will be assigned to a new panel in the ordinary course.

We hereby REMAND to the District Court for further proceedings in accordance with this order. The motion of Nancy Sherman, Executrix to intervene in this case on appeal is DENIED as moot.
#### Milton S.C. MAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAYNOR BUILDERS OF LOUISBURG; Richard Raynor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-1966

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

Milton S.C. Mays, Appellant Pro Se. Blair Kristen Beddow, Broughton, Wilkins, Smith, Suggs *&*Thompson, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Milton S.C. Mays seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing Mays’ civil action for failure to prosecute. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a *789jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 17, 2015. The notice of appeal was filed on May 31, 2016. Because Mays failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period,-we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED