alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1,610
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    344,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         1,683,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (449,341)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,731,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          852,411
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,590
<OTHER-SE>                                     875,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,731,977
<SALES>                                        114,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,089
<CGS>                                          200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,183)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        




</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-3, Nos. 333-58296 and 333-65776) and related prospectuses of Insight
Communications Company, Inc. for the registration of up to $1 billion in
aggregate offering price in various combinations of its Class A Common Stock,
preferred stock, debt securities, warrants or subscription rights and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-57808) pertaining to the Insight
Communications Company, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan of our reports dated March
12, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Insight
Communications Company, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 1O-K) for the
year ended December 31, 200l.

                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 27, 2002
<PAGE>   1






                                  Exhibit 23.1
                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


<PAGE>   2


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of CytRx Corporation of our report dated February 27, 1998, included in the 1997
Annual Report to Shareholders of CytRx Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of CytRx Corporation
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, as of the date of our report referred to in the preceding
paragraph, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 Nos. 33-48706 and 333-37171 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation
401(k) Profit-Sharing Plan, 33-93816 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 1994
Stock Option Plan, and 33-93818 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 1995 Stock
Option Plan, and on Form S-3 Nos. 33-93820, 333-39607 and 333-44043 and the
related Prospectus, of our report dated February 27, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of CytRx
Corporation.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Atlanta, Georgia
March 20, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE BISYS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          53,745
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,321
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,714
<PP&E>                                         115,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 456,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,247
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           549
<OTHER-SE>                                     305,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   456,940
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               270,357
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   467
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,767
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,209
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1417 

To clarify protections related to sex and sex-segregated spaces and to activities 

under title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2021 

Mrs. MILLER of Illinois (for herself, Mrs. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. JOYCE of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. CLINE, Mr. BROOKS, 

Mr. ROY, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. GUEST, Ms. HERRELL, Mr. 

BABIN, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. PALMER, Mr. OWENS, Mr. 

CLYDE, and Mr. DAVIDSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To clarify protections related to sex and sex-segregated 

spaces and to activities under title IX of the Education 

Amendments of 1972. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safety and Oppor5 tunity for Girls Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1417 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TITLE IX OF THE EDUCATION 

2 AMENDMENTS OF 1972. 

3 Section 901 of title IX of the Education Amendments 

4 of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681) is amended by adding at end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(d) For purposes of this title— 

7 ‘‘(1) the term ‘sex’ means sex determined solely 

8 by a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at 

9 birth; and 

10 ‘‘(2) the term ‘sex-segregated’ means limited to 

11 or separated by sex. 

12 ‘‘(e) Nothing in this title may be construed— 

13 ‘‘(1) to prohibit, to authorize the Secretary to 

14 prohibit, or to authorize the Secretary to make re15 ceipt of funding under this title contingent upon an 

16 educational institution forgoing the maintenance of 

17 sex-segregated spaces by educational institutions, in18 cluding bathrooms and locker rooms; or 

19 ‘‘(2) to prohibit, to authorize the Secretary to 

20 prohibit, or to authorize the Secretary to make re21 ceipt of funding under this title contingent upon an 

22 educational institution forgoing the maintenance of 

23 sex-segregated athletic or academic programs by 

24 educational institutions.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
I 

IMPERIAL COUNTY 

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 

May 12,2014 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx, Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

1405 N. IMPERIAL AVE., SUITE 1 

EL CENTRO, CA 92243-2875 

PHONE: (760) 592-4494 

FAX: (760) 592-4497 

RE: Docket DOT -OST -2008-0299 

Dear Secretary F oxx, 

On behalf of the Imperial County Transportation Commission, I write to request reconsideration of the Department of 

Transportations' Tentative Order to terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in El Centro, California located 

in Imperial County. Please consider the negative economic impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed 

termination of the program. 

The Imperial County Airport has a tremendous track record of surpassing the EAS program requirements put forth by 

the government, as they have dramatically exceeded the enplanement minimum in four of the last five fiscal years. 

Unfortunately, in FY 2013, the Imperial County Airport barely fell below the ten enplanement threshold, by reaching 

9.5 enplanements for the first time. 

As you know, the Essential Air Service was put into place to guarantee that small communities, including those within 

the Imperial County, continue to be served by certified air carriers. Over the last several years, Imperial County has and 

continues to experience one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation. It is also important to note that 23% of 

our County population lives below the poverty level (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012). The EAS program is vital to our 

economy, please consider all factors before terminating a much-needed program in the region. 

As you prepare the Final Order, please also consider the Imperial Valley's track record over the last three fiscal years. 

Please consider the void that will be left should the Department of Transportation ultimately decide to terminate the 

much-needed EAS program currently in effect at the Imperial County Airport. 

Thank you for your time and consideration of my request. 

Sincerely, 

Executive Director 

CITIES OF BRAWLEY, CALEXICO, CALIPATRIA, EL CENTRO, HOLTVILLE, IMPERIAL, WESTMORLAND, IMPERIAL 

IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND COUNTY OF IMPERIAL 

T: Projects\ICTC Correspondencelsupport lcttcr-EAS El Centro
Steven T. HUMPHREY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0258

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A (this Amendment) to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in this Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of California Micro Devices Corporation.



|                    |  |                         |  | 
|------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: June 30, 2005 |  | /s/ ROBERT V. DICKINSON |  | 
|                    |  | Robert V. Dickinson     |  | 
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|                    |  |                        
|Date: June 30, 2005 |  | /s/ R. GREGORY MILLER   |  | 
|                    |  | R. Gregory Miller       |  | 
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 



This certification accompanies this
Amendment pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Federal
Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference
Brady Allen ELIASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1555

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, AND
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE AND ITS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBIT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         $92,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    142,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               272,039
<PP&E>                                         176,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 378,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,566
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           402
<OTHER-SE>                                     222,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   378,045
<SALES>                                      1,118,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,118,743
<CGS>                                          609,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  609,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,967
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,952
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   $50,952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.52
        

</TABLE>
City of Austin 

Aviation Department 

Austin-Bergstrom International Airport 

3600 Presidential Blvd., Ste. 411, Austin, Texas 78719 

512/530-ABlA (2242) Fax: 5121530-7686 

niww.ahia.org 

March 8, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010^«^Bf 

Dear IVIr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express the support of the City of Austin Department of Aviation for 

the application for antitrust immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines 

and Japan Airlines. Approval of the proposed arrangements will upgrade trans-Pacific service options 

available to Austin; American Airlines is the carrier whose service pattern at Austin provides the most 

effective service between Austin and pacific gateway airports. With anti-trust immunity, the oneworld 

alliance will be able to provide more effective schedules to destinations across the Pacific Rim and that 

is important to the technology businesses based in Austin. 

The proposed alliance between American Airlines and Japan Airlines is vital for the oneworld alliance to 

compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliances. This increased alliance competition will in turn 

enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy-first by solidifying U.S. -Japan Open Skies, 

then by serving as a foundation for further liberalization across Asia. Without approval of the 

application, effective competition across the pacific will be reduced to two alliance groups and we 

believe that Austin's trans-Pacific air service will deteriorate because neither of those alliances has a 

major presence in Austin. 

After a thorough review, we encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this application as 

it would enable the oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive air 

transportation services. Approval of the AA/JAL application will have a positive impact on air travel by 

offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers 

continue to belnefit from the competition afforded by three competitive air alliances. 

We urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

I Smith 

Executive Director
Reo T. NANCE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1160

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Belated appeal is dismissed.
John MCNEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Ronald Satish EMRIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP; D.C. Bar; On the Potomac Productions; Thomas Hart, Esquire, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1358

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: July 13, 2017

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for improper venue.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Even assuming, without deciding, that the district court abused its *187discretion in dismissing the complaint for improper venue, “we may affirm a district court’s ruling on any ground apparent in the record.” *See U.S. ex rel. Drakeford v. Tuomey,*792 F.3d 364, 376 (4th Cir. 2015). As our review of Emrit’s complaint reveals that it is “time-barred on its face,” and thus patently frivolous, we conclude the complaint was properly subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012). *Nasim v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction,*64 F.3d 951, 956 (4th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 We conclude that the district court's order dismissing the complaint without prejudice is an appealable final order. *See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015). Although Emrit's notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after the district court’s dismissal order, his appeal is timely because the court’s order explains in full its reasons for dismissing the complaint and therefore is not a separate judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). *See Hughes v. Halifax Cnty. Sch. Bd.,*823 F.2d 832, 835 (4th Cir. 1987). The order is deemed "entered,” for purposes of Fed. R. App. P, 4(a), when “150 days have run from entry of the order in the civil docket.” Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A)(ii). As Emrit’s notice of appeal was filed within that 150-day period, we have jurisdiction to consider his appeal. *See Quinn v. Haynes,*234 F.3d 837, 843 (4th Cir. 2000).
EXHIBIT 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Charles Deisbeck, Chief Executive Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Second Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.





Date: December 31, 2010





/s/ Charles DeisbeckCharles Deisbeck, Chief Executive Officer







E - 3
Deran Devonnemosely BURNS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Willie ROGERS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2173

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit 19**

 

**Consent of Colin Hardie**

 

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-Fof New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connectionwith, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report Feasibility Studyof the Rainy River Project, Ontario, Canada”, dated February 14, 2014, included in the Annual Information Form of New GoldInc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2014, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in theregistration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.

  

Dated this 27th day of March, 2015

 

 

*/s/ Colin Hardie*	

Name: 	Colin Hardie

Title: 	Senior Metallurgist