# The Attorney General of Texas May 8, 1978 JOHN L. HILL Attorney General
Honorable Chet Brooks Chairman Opinion No. H- 1163 Senate Committee onHuman Resources State Capitol Austin, Texas 767B Dear Senator Brooks: Re: Whether secret bsllots conducted by a governing body violate the Open Meetings Act.

Youindicate that a school district board of trustees recently met in an open session and elected officers for the board; however, the election of one of the officers was done by secret ballot. You ask if asecret ballot taken at a public meeting constitutes aviolation ofthe Texas Open Meetings Act. The Texas Open Meetings Act, article 6252-17,V.T.C.S., provides: Sec. Z.(a) Except as otherwise provided in this Act or specifically permitted in the Constitution, every regular, special, or called meeting or session of every governmental body shsll beopen to.the public;

.... Q) Whenever any deliberations or any portions of a meeting are closed to the public as permitted by this Act, no final action, decision, or vote with regard to any matter considered in the closed meeting shall be made except in a meeting which is open to the public

. ... The Open Meetings Act is to be liberally construed to effect its purpose “of assuring that the public has the opportunity to be informed concerning the transactions ofpublic business.” Toyah Independent School District v. PecosBarstow Independent School District, 466S.W.2d 377, 360(Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio 1971,no writ). A similar question was presented to the Illinois Attorney General in 1933. The Illinois statute provided that aboard wasrequired to “sit with open doors.” ‘Inconstruing that statute the Illinois Attorney General said

p. 4706Honorable Chet Brooks - Page 2 (H-1163)

This is aplain legislative declaration against secrecy of any kind or character entering into the deliberation of the county board.

... Of what avail is an open door to the public if the proceedings are secret. The eye can see, the ear can hear, but secrecy conceals all. It isnoadvantage to the citizen to see e member write a name secretly on a ballot unless he isprivileged to reed what isthereon written. lllinois Attorney General Opinion No. 246 (May 4, 1933). This continues to be the law inIllinois. Illinois Attorney General Opinion No.S-917(June 20, 1975). At least three other states have reached the conclusion that a secret ballot violates a statute requiring open meetings ofgovernmental bodies. Florida Attorney General Opinion 073-264 (July 17, 1973); Oregon Attorney General Opinion No. 7ll5 (October 11,1974);Virginia Attorney General Opinion to the Honorable Richard R. G.Hobson (August 9, 1977);see Bassett v. Braddock, 262So.2d 425 @la. 1972)(four judge majority suggests, butdoes not hold, that a secret ballot is illegal; remaining three judges specifically indicate that a secret ballot violates the Florida Government inthe Sunshine law). Cf. Kansas Attorney General Opinion No.75-293 (July 15, 1975)(holds ~that an openmeetings statute which specifically prohibits taking binding action by secret ballot prohibits a secret ballot ,for the election ofa school board officer). Contra Massachusetts Attorney General Opinion to Governor John A.Volpe(July 19,‘m Weconcur in the conclusion reached by attorneys general of the majority of states which have faced the question. The Open Meetings Act isdesigned to insure that decisions of public bodies are reached openly and that the public can observe the actions of their representatives. The secret ballot, when used to protect citizens when choosing their representatives, is ahallmark of a democratic system of government; but, when it is used to conceal e public official’s vote, it violates the fundamental tenet ofan elected or appointed official’s ultimate accountability to the electorate. See generally 116Cong. Rec. 25796-25616 (1970). Webelieve it is the antithesis ofthe requirements of the Texas Open Meetings Act. Thus, it isour opinion that the Open Meetings Act prohibits the use of secret ballots in meetings ofgovernmental bodies. SUMMARY

The use of a secret ballot in a meeting of a governmental body violates the Texas Open Meetings Act.

p. 4707.’ ,

.

Honorable Chet Brooks - Page 3 (B-1163)

APPROVED:

C. ROBERT HEATH,Chairman Opinion Committee jst

p. 4708