alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 E0 01 5 . MI LLER v . CAMERON et a l.

Earl Cam ero n m o v es t h i s Co u rt fo r a n e m e r g en cy s u pers ed eas t o s t ay a

co n tem p t o rd er en t ered b y t h e t ri al co u rt

. W e i n i t i al l y d en ied Cam ero n ’ s m ot i o n fo r

fai l u re t o co m

pl y wi t h t h is Co urt ’ s ru l es

. Cam ero n t h en fi l ed an am en d ed m o t i o n,

wh i c h we w il l t reat as a m o t i o n fo r reco n s i derat i o n

. Cam ero n h as n o w co n fo rm ed

wi t h t he ru l es o f t h i s Co u rt

, an d we t h erefo re GRANT t h e m o t i o n fo r reco n s i d erat i o n

an d ad d res s t h e m eri t s o f t h e em erg en cy m o t i on

.

Cam ero n’ s m o t i o n an d s u p p o rt i n g d o cu m en t s s h o w t h at t h e t ri al co u rt o rd ered

t h at Cam ero n b e i n carcerat ed fo r ci v i l an d cri m in al co n t em p t

. Cam ero n fi l ed a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal as wel l as an ap p l icat i o n fo r su p ers ed eas i n t h e t ri al co u rt

. “ [T] h i s Co u rt

m ay is s u e su ch o rd ers or g i ve s u ch d i rect io n t o t he tri al co u rt as m ay b e n eces s ary to

p res erv e j u r i s d i c t i o n o f an ap p eal o r t o p rev en t t h e co n t es t ed i s s u e fro m beco m i n g

m o ot .” Ru l e 40 (b ). Cam ero n ’ s em erg en cy m o t i o n i n t hi s Co u rt d oes no t s h o w t h at

t h e t r i a l co u rt h as d en i ed t h e ap p l i cat i o n fo r s u p ers ed eas n o r d o es i t s h o w t h a t

Cam ero n i s i n carcerat ed

. T h e r e f o re, Cam ero n’ s m o t i on d o es n o t m eet t h e

req u i rem en t s o f Ru l e 4 0 (b ), an d i t i s t h erefo re DENIED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/05/2015 November 05, 2015
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1






The Board of Directors
ACC Consumer Finance Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-17047 and No. 333-17039) on Form S-8 of ACC Consumer Finance Corporation of
our report dated January 26, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of ACC Consumer Finance Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, the
six-month transition period ended December 31, 1994 and the period from July 15,
1993 (inception) through June 30, 1994, which report appears in the December 31,
1996, annual report on Form 10-K of ACC Consumer Finance Corporation.



                                                   /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
San Diego, California                                 KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
March 24, 1997
FACT SHEET

COUNTERDRUG PROGRAM

NATIONAL GUARD

MISSION

Support the detection, interdiction, disruption and 

curtailment of drug trafficking and use by applying 

military-unique skills and resources.

54 State Counterdrug Programs 

Supporting state and local law enforcement and other government agencies in 

drug supply reduction through: 

$179 million

Students trained from law 

enforcement agencies

Law enforcement and 

community partners 

supported

VISION

Reduce drug-related threats to national security 

through military support to federal, state, tribal and 

local law enforcement and governmental and 

community partners.

FY2019 Statistics

5 National Guard Counterdrug Schools

Providing specialized training in drug interdiction activities for:

- Federal, state and local law enforcement

- Military personnel

- Aerial/ground reconnaissance and 

observation 

- Communication support

- Transportation 

- Engineer support

- Technical support in linguistics and 

analysis

- Mission analysis

- Planning 

- Decision-making 

- Leadership development 

- Cross-organization coordination.

Helping community-based organizations reduce drug demand through:

FY2019 Counterdrug Program Impact

Budget for FY2019

11,000+ 69,736

Cocaine/Crack Cocaine 298,015 lbs. Pharmaceuticals 214,988 lbs.

Marijuana 2,613,755 lbs. Property $150,721,917

Methamphetamine 48,212 lbs. Weapons 125,401

Heroin 6,004 lbs. Vehicles 2,379

Opiates 160,937 lbs. Currency $413,675,642

Ecstasy 410 lbs.
March 23 , 2015

Mr. Matthew Rohlik

Midwest Aerial Technologies

12171 210 th Avenue Southwest

Renville, MN 56284

Dear Mr. Rohlik :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your J anuary 13 , 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

0070 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, y ou must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exempti on.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 12 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 12

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

 Mr. Norman (for himself, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Massie, Mr. Joyce 
 of Pennsylvania, Mr. Perry, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Reschenthaler, 
Mr. Budd, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Mr. Steube, Mrs. 
Lesko, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Davidson, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. 
  Murphy of North Carolina, and Mr. Jackson) submitted the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has served 3 terms as a Representative 
shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives. For 
purposes of this section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in 
the House of Representatives shall be included as 1 term in determining 
the number of terms that such person has served as a Representative if 
the person fills the vacancy for more than 1 year.
    ``Section 2. No person who has served 2 terms as a Senator shall be 
eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of 
this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy 
in the Senate shall be included as 1 term in determining the number of 
terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills the 
vacancy for more than 3 years.
    ``Section 3. No term beginning before the date of the ratification 
of this article shall be taken into account in determining eligibility 
for election or appointment under this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

232 

CA 14-02091 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF MIKE HAWLEY, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK 

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY 

SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County

(Michael M. Mohun, A.J.), entered October 17, 2014 in a proceeding

pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding

seeking to annul that part of the determination, following a tier III

disciplinary hearing, finding that he violated inmate rule 113.10 (7

NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i] [weapon possession]). Supreme Court

dismissed the petition, and we affirm. Although a directive of the

Department of Corrections and Community Supervision provides that an

inmate removed from his or her cell for a search has the right to

observe the search absent a determination that he or she presents a

safety or security risk (see Matter of Johnson v Fischer, 109 AD3d

1070, 1071), that directive is inapplicable here because petitioner

was being examined in the prison hospital when his cell was searched,

and he was therefore not “removed from his cell for the purpose of

conducting the search” (Matter of Williams v Goord, 270 AD2d 744, 745;

see Matter of Horton v Annucci, 133 AD3d 1002, 1003; Matter of Nieves

v Goord, 262 AD2d 1042, 1042). Contrary to petitioner’s contention,

the Hearing Officer properly denied his request to call a lieutenant

as a witness because the lieutenant’s testimony “ ‘would have been

either redundant or immaterial’ ” (Matter of Jackson v Annucci, 122

AD3d 1288, 1288; see 7 NYCRR 254.5 [a]; Matter of Mullady v Bezio, 87

AD3d 765, 766). Petitioner’s further contention that it was improper

for the hearing officer to address two misbehavior reports at one

hearing is not preserved for our review because he did not raise it at
-2- 232 

CA 14-02091 

the hearing (see Matter of Freeman v Selsky, 270 AD2d 547, 547; see

generally Matter of Allah v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1507, 1507). In any

event, “no law or regulation prohibits the review of two misbehavior

reports in one disciplinary hearing” (Freeman, 270 AD2d at 547; see

Matter of Baker v Fischer, 96 AD3d 1334, 1334), and petitioner’s claim

of prejudice is not supported by the record (see generally Matter of

Bramble v Mead, 242 AD2d 858, 859, lv denied 91 NY2d 803). 

Entered: March 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                     217,465
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,890,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         2,245,773
<PP&E>                                  50,489,854
<DEPRECIATION>                          27,300,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          25,470,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,530,612
<BONDS>                                    400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    45,974
<OTHER-SE>                              15,855,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            25,470,037
<SALES>                                  3,942,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         4,020,035
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              924,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            28,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          56,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,871,583
<INCOME-TAX>                               571,555
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,300,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,300,028
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .29



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6742

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JONTAVIOUS KYREE LYONS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 22-6743

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JONTAVIOUS KYREE LYONS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:18-cr-00052-CCE-2; 1:18-cr-00254-

CCE-1)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6743 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jontavious Kyree Lyons, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6743 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Jontavious Kyree Lyons appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release.

* We 

review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. 

United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). 

We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion

and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. United States v. Lyons, Nos. 1:18-cr-00052-CCE-2, 1:18-cr-00254-CCE-1

(M.D.N.C. June 14, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although Lyons was charged and convicted in two separate criminal cases, the 

district court issued a single order denying Lyons’ compassionate release motion.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6743 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 26, 2016

s0718

Order 

Clerk

July 26, 2016

151945 & (13)(18)(19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151945

COA: 325933

Kalkaska CC: 08-003014-FC

DAVID CHRISTIAN DeJONGE, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to file supplemental brief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of 

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion for production of 

records is DENIED as moot and the motion for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 121 

To provide for the hiring of 200 additional Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives agents and investigators to enforce gun laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the hiring of 200 additional Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents and investigators to enforce gun laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Violence Reduc5 tion Resources Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds as follows: 

8 (1) On average, more than 100,000 people in 

9 the United States are shot in murders, assaults, and 

10 other crimes and more than 32,000 people die from 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 121 IH

1 gun violence annually, including 2,677 children 

2 under 18 years of age. 

3 (2) Many of these crimes were committed by 

4 people who never should have been able to purchase 

5 a gun. 

6 (3) Each year hundreds of law enforcement of7 ficers lose their lives to gun violence, having been 

8 shot to death while protecting their communities. 

9 (4) Millions of guns are sold every year in ‘‘no 

10 questions asked’’ transactions and experts estimate 

11 that 40 percent of guns now sold in the United 

12 States are sold without a background check of the 

13 purchaser. 

14 SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

15 FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES AGENTS AND IN16 VESTIGATORS. 

17 The Attorney General may hire 200 individuals to 

18 serve as agents and investigators for the Bureau of Alco19 hol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, in addition to any 

20 individuals so serving as of the date of the enactment of 

21 this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 7 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 

Members of Congress from receiving compensation during a fiscal year 

unless both Houses of Congress have agreed to a concurrent resolution 

on the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal 

year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself and Mr. GALLAGHER) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to prohibit Members of Congress from receiving 

compensation during a fiscal year unless both Houses 

of Congress have agreed to a concurrent resolution on 

the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning 

of that fiscal year. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 7 IH 

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

2 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

3 for ratification: 

4 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. A Member of Congress may not receive 

6 a compensation for service as a Member of Congress dur7 ing a fiscal year unless both Houses of Congress have 

8 agreed to an identical concurrent resolution on the budget 

9 for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal 

10 year. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall apply with respect to 

12 fiscal years which begin after this article becomes a valid 

13 part of the Constitution.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB771]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Tilefish 
Advisory Panel will hold a public webinar meeting. See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION for agenda details.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, February 24, 2022, from 9 
a.m. until 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted to the calendar prior to the meeting at www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is for the 
Advisory Panel to develop a fishery performance report (FPR) for both 
golden and blueline tilefish. The intent of the FPR is to facilitate a 
venue for structured input from the Advisory Panel for the tilefish 
specifications processes. The FPR will be used by the MAFMC's 
Scientific and Statistical Committee and the Tilefish Monitoring 
Committee when reviewing golden tilefish specifications and setting 
blueline tilefish specifications.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 31, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-02287 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
### The full content of this file cannot be displayed with your current PDF viewer. Please update to the latest

possible version to view this document. ACCEPTED 06-15-00014-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 2/20/2015 4:54:16 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK