alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         807,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  790,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      43,321,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,719,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     27,057,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,719,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,799,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  840,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               656,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,138,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (835,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (7.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.98)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00183-CV

In the Interest of A.J.D., A Child §

§

§

§

From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (2011-30977-211)

October 24, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of SAN Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report), I, John Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer, acting Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
December 31, 2003 and for the periods then ended.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 30,
2004

| | /s/
John Jenkins
    John Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer,
    acting Chief Financial Officer and
    Principal Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# U.S. Navy Accelerates Progress in Providing Vaccinations for Sailors

## From Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Apprentice D.S. Randol 

More DetailsMore DetailsMore Details The event, organized by Navy leadership, was crafted with the goals of ensuring mission readiness and protecting Sailors. Capt. Laurence J. Kuhn, Force Surgeon, Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic, spearheaded the effort alongside other naval medical personnel, such as the ship’s nurse for USS George Washington (CVN-73), LCDR Denilo Mendoza.“It’s a fabulous opportunity to extend our clinical coverage and capabilities to provide vaccines to our operational forces,” said Mendoza. “It gets us out there in the forefront to be proactive in making sure that people who need the vaccine to support the mission and our country’s assets are afforded the vaccine and can stay ready to fight tonight.”The effort aligned with the Navy’s overall prioritization schema, and was completely voluntary. However, many of those who chose to receive the vaccine voiced their hope that with the rising number of vaccinations, individuals who are unsure on whether or not to get it for themselves are encouraged to do so.“I’m getting the vaccine to show the younger guys that it’s safe and effective.” Chief Warrant Officer 3 William Perez, who got his shot at the event, said. “It excites me to know that there’s a vaccine out there, and that it’s getting safer for all of us here in the Navy and in the world.”Farther along down the line, the Navy’s goals for presenting vaccination opportunities to its Sailors include the establishment of large venues on local bases that are both convenient to the population and will support large streams of personnel, as well as utilization of mobile vaccination teams that are capable of visiting individual units. Kuhn spoke optimistically about the weeks ahead. “With increased vaccines becoming available, we are at a point where we are able to establish high-throughput areas near the Navy waterfront,” said Kuhn.  “With every shot administered, we are turning the tide on the COVID-19 pandemic and doing our part to keep our force healthy and safe."
Michael WILKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3694

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01277]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Friday, January 21, 2022, 12:00 p.m. EST.

PLACE: Meeting to take place by telephone and is open to the public by 
telephone: 800-259-2693, Conference ID #: 3653553.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commission business for the month of January.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Angelia Rorison: 202-376-7700; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e39396818f8a80828585828a9190a39690808091cd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cbbbbea9a7a2a8aaadadaaa2b9b88bbeb8a8a8b9e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

     Dated: January 19, 2022.
Angelia Rorison,
USCCR Media and Communications Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-01277 Filed 1-19-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 690
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 2 of 10 PAGEID #: 691
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 3 of 10 PAGEID #: 692
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 4 of 10 PAGEID #: 693
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 5 of 10 PAGEID #: 694
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 6 of 10 PAGEID #: 695
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 7 of 10 PAGEID #: 696
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 8 of 10 PAGEID #: 697
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 9 of 10 PAGEID #: 698
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 57 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 10 of 10 PAGEID #: 699
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4630-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4630-DR), dated December 12, 
2021, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued January 6, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include permanent 
work under the Public Assistance program for those areas determined to 
have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by 
the President in his declaration of December 12, 2021.

    Caldwell, Christian, Fulton, Graves, Hart, Hickman, Hopkins, 
Logan, Lyon, Marion, Marshall, Muhlenberg, Ohio, Taylor, and Warren 
Counties for permanent work [Categories C-G] (already designated for 
Individual Assistance and assistance for debris removal and 
emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct 
federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).
    Breckinridge, Bullitt, Grayson, Meade, Shelby, and Spencer 
Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B), including 
direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.
    Todd County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02238 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 12-3072

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v. Justin James Rodriguez, also known as Ju stin James Lee Rodriguez, also known as Justin James Hunter lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul

____________ Submitted: March 11, 2013 Filed: April 5, 2013 [Unpublished]

____________ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Justin James Rodriguez pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The district court 1 sentenced Rodriguez to 108 months of imprisonment. Rodriguez appeals, contending the district court's sentence is substantively unreasonable. We affirm. Rodriguez was charged with unlawfu lly possessing a firearm after police discovered a photo on his cellular phone of Rodriguez posing with a gun in his cousin's apartment. At sentencing, the district court statedit intended to vary downward from the 120-month statutory maximum due to the lack of immediate danger posed to the public by Rodriguez' s possession of the gun, as well as his challenging upbringing, which included di fficult family circumstances and an addiction to alcohol he devel oped at an early age. At the same time, the court noted the extent of the variance was limited by R odriguez's lengthy criminal history, which the court found "as extensive as can be give n someone [Rodriguez's] age." Sent. Tr. 14. We review "the substantive reasonabl eness of the sentence imposed under an abuse-of-discretion standard ." Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). An abuse of discretion occurs when the district court "fails to consider a relevant factor that should have received significant weight , gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or considers only the appropriate factors but commits a clear error of judgment in weighing those factors." United States v. Moore , 565 F.3d 435, 438 (8th Cir. 2009) (quotation and citation omitted). The district court stated its reasons for the sentence handed down after considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. A sentencing court has "wide latitude to weigh the § 3553(a) factors in each case and assign some factors greater weight than

1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-others in determining an appropriate sentence." United States v. Bridges , 569 F.3d 374, 379 (8th Cir. 2009). In this case, th e district court's decision to balance the mitigating factors of Rodriguez's upbringing and the nature of the offense against the aggravating factor of Rodriguez's criminal history is well within the considerable discretion of the district court. We can find no basis for c oncluding Rodriguez's sentence was substantively unreasonable. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________

-3-
EX PARTE William Patrick SMITH

CR-16-0460

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

Jason Warren,
Plaintiff(s),
Case Number: 1:18¢v543
vs.
Judge Susan J. Dlott
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant(s).
ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge
Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and
filed with this Court on August 26, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10). Subsequently, the
plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) and the defendant filed a
response to the objections (Doc. 13).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de
novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine
that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, based upon the Court’s review of the documents, it is ORDERED that
defendant's decision is supported by substantial evidence and is hereby AFFIRMED. This case is
hereby TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

tesa Sato

Judge Susan J. Dit
United States aoe Court
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 19, 2019

No. 04-19-00352-CR

EX PARTE Otis T. MCKANE,

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR1505

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On July 12, 2019, this Court issued an order setting briefing deadlines in this appeal from 

an order denying relief in a habeas corpus and bail proceeding. Appellant’s brief is due August 1, 

2019. Also, on July 12, 2019, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s 

brief, requesting an extension to July 25, 2019. As appellant’s brief is not due until August 1, 

2019, we deny the motion as moot.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of July, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 8, 2015

No. 04-15-00212-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.K.H., A CHILD,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-01466

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights. We 

ORDER court reporter Victoria Gonzalez to file the reporter’s record on or before May 18, 2015.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EX PARTE Antonio MIDDLETON

CR-16-0226

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Garb Oil & Power Corporation, and subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John C. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

 

|   | **•** | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of |
|--------|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

|   | **•** | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,            |
|--------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

|   | Date: 10/24/2007 | By: /s/ *John C. Brewer* |
|--------|------------------|--------------------------|

|   | John C. Brewer |
|--------|----------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer and |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2013 UT App 107

_________________________________________________________

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF UTAH,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DARRELL EUGENE WASHINGTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Per Curiam Decision

No. 20130070‐CA

Filed April 25, 2013

Second District, Ogden Department

The Honorable Michael D. DiReda

No. 011901799

Darrell Eugene Washington, Appellant Pro Se

John E. Swallow and Marian Decker, Attorneys for Appellee

Before JUDGES ORME, MCHUGH, and ROTH.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Darrell Eugene Washington appeals the trial court’s order

denying his motions to compel discovery, which were filed in his

criminal case. This appeal is before the court on its own motion for

summarydisposition basedonthe lack of a substantial question for

review. We affirm.

¶2 Washington pleaded guilty to a third degree felony in 2001.

In 2012, he sought to challenge his conviction, filing the motions to

compel the production of evidence that are the subject of this

appeal. His motions were a mix of arguments and requested relief,

including document requests and assertions of ineffective assis‐

tance of counsel and a coerced plea. Additional argument in the

motions indicated that Washington’s efforts were aimed toward
State v. Washington

20130070‐CA 2013 2 UT App 107

filing a petition for a determination of factual innocence under

Utah’sPost‐ConvictionRemediesAct(PCRA). SeeUtah CodeAnn.

§§ 78B‐9‐101 to ‐405 (LexisNexis 2012).

¶3 The trial court determined that it lacked jurisdiction over

Washington’s requests because he had filed the motions seeking

civil relief in his criminal case. Generally, once a trial court in a

criminal proceeding “imposes a valid sentence, it loses subject

matter jurisdiction over the case.” State v. Montoya, 825 P.2d 676,

670 (Utah 1991). We see no error in the trial court’s determination,

particularly given that the relief Washington appears to be seeking

is within the scope of the PCRA.

¶4 The PCRA “establishes the sole remedy” for a person

challenging a conviction after other legal remedies have been

exhausted. Utah Code Ann. § 78B‐9‐102(1). Proceedings under the

PCRA are civil in nature and are governed by the rules of civil

procedure. Id. To obtain a hearing to determine factual innocence,

a petition must be filed in the district court under the PCRA and

rule 65C of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. § 78B‐9‐402; Utah

R. Civ. P. 65C.

¶5 Accordingly, the relief Washington seeks is available only

through the provisions of the PCRA, a civil proceeding. There is no

such relief available through his criminal case. As a result, the trial

court did not err in finding that it lacked jurisdiction over the

motions filed by Washington in his criminal case.

¶6 Affirmed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1. Such quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: November 14, 2005

By: /s/ James A. Joyce
    -----------------------
    James A. Joyce
    Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.