alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U.S. Navy Statements Feed

Statements from U.S Navy.

- Secretary Carlos Del Toro Releases 2024 Black History Month Message and Video to the Force Secretary Carlos Del Toro Releases 2024 Black History Month Message and Video to the Force.
- Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro Issues Statement on Navy Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Christopher J. Chambers and Navy Special Warfare Operator 2nd Class Nathan Gage Ingram Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro issued a statement on the loss of&nbsp;Navy Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Christopher J. Chambers and Navy Special Warfare Operator 2nd Class Nathan Gage Ingram, Jan. 22.
- Secretary Carlos Del Toro Releases 2023 Holiday Safety Video Message Secretary Carlos Del Toro released his 2023 Holiday Safety Video Message, asking people to keep in mind our fellow Sailors, Marines, and civilians who may be separated from their loved ones by distance or events this holiday season. Please take time to check in with your friends, colleagues, and co-workers. Also look for those who might need a friend or a place to visit during the season.
- Secretary Carlos Del Toro Releases 2023 Holiday Video Message Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro releases a video message for the 2023 Holiday Season.
- Secretary Carlos Del Toro Released the Following 2023 Holiday Message to the Force Statement from Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro:
- Secretary Carlos Del Toro Released the Following Thanksgiving Message to the Force Statement from Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro:
- SECNAV Del Toro Statement on the Swearing-In of Adm. Lisa Franchetti as 33rd Chief of Naval Operations Statement from Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro:
- SECNAV Del Toro Statement on General Eric Smith, the 39th Commandant of the Marine Corps Statement from Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro:
- SECNAV Del Toro Statement on the Passing of U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, of California Statement from Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro:
- SECNAV Del Toro Statement on the Swearing-In of Gen Eric Smith as 39th Commandant of the Marine Corps Statement from Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro:
Arlis WILSON v. STATE

CR-15-0746

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph Antonio QUATES v. STATE

CR-15-0859

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Jennifer D. MARSHALL; David C. Marshall, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ETHICON, INCORPORATED; Johnson & Johnson, Defendants-Appellees, and Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Defendant.

No. 16-1631

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 14, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

Tracy W. Houck, Ron Riggle, Houck & Riggle, LLC, Ruston, Louisiana, for Appellants. David B. Thomas, Daniel R. Higginbotham, Thomas Combs & Spann, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Christy Jones, John C. Henegan, Sr., Susana Moore Moldoveanu, Butler Snow LLP, Ridgeland, Mississippi, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jennifer D. and David C. Marshall appeal the district court’s orders dismissing this action for failure to effect timely service of process and denying their motion *776for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-02809, 2:12-md-92327 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 26 *&*May 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX PARTE C.H. and D.H.

(In re: Department of Human Resources v. C.H. and D.H.)

2160366

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
SPAULDING DECON, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and Laura Spaulding, an Individual, Appellants, v. FEDERATED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY f/k/a American Vehicle Insurance Company, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1038

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          73,230
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,734,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                   221,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,293,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,722,866
<PP&E>                                       6,971,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,965,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,128,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,643,397
<BONDS>                                      9,518,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,073,530
<COMMON>                                     1,265,200
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,350,142)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,128,388
<SALES>                                     29,116,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,116,469
<CGS>                                       23,584,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,150,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                67,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             932,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,058,331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,058,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,058,331)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        

</TABLE>
Katherine L. LACKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4230

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

Justin S. Gaines, Lakeland, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
David L. BEASON v. STATE

CR-15-1281

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Gil Contreras-Rodriguez, :

:

Petitioner(s), :

: Case Number: 1:18cv389

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

Jeff Sessions, et al., :

:

Respondent(s). :

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate

Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on July 19, 2018 (Doc. 4), to whom this case was referred

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the

time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired August 14, 2018, hereby

ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution since the petitioner failed

to comply with the Court’s Order of June 15, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 123-12 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 123-12 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 5801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB302]


Draft 2021 Marine Mammal Stock Assessment Reports; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS published a document in the Federal Register on October 
25, 2021 requesting comments on the Draft 2021 Marine Mammal Stock 
Assessment Reports. The document contained incorrect link for 
submitting electronic comments.

DATES: Comments must be received by February 16, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Zachary Schakner, Office of 
Science and Technology, 301-427-8106, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbe1dad8d3dac9c295e8d8d3dad0d5dec9fbd5d4dada95dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="633902000b02111a4d30000b02080d0611230d0c02024d040c15">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of October 25, 2021 (86 FR 58887), in FR 
Doc 2021-23225 on page 58887 in the second column, correct the 
`electronic submission' directions to read:
    You may submit comments or new information, identified by NOAA-
NMFS-2022-0013, through the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
    Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via 
the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and 
enter NOAA-NMFS-2022-0013 in the Search box. Click on the ``Comment'' 
icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.

    Dated: January 27, 2022.
Evan Howell,
Director, Office of Science and Technology, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-02102 Filed 2-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.6
                               SECOND AMENDMENT
                                    TO THE
                    AMENDED AND RESTATED BORROWING AGREEMENT


      THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BORROWING AGREEMENT 
(the "Amendment") dated as of September 30, 1996, is between SPS TRANSACTION 
SERVICES, INC. ("Borrower") and DEAN WITTER, DISCOVER & CO. ("Lender").

      WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender are parties to an Amended and Restated 
Borrowing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1995, and a First Amendment to 
the Amended and Restated Borrowing Agreement, dated as of May 6, 1996 
(collectively, the "Borrowing Agreement"), pursuant to which Lender has made 
certain loans to the Borrower; and

      WHEREAS, the Borrower and Lender desire to further amend the Borrowing 
Agreement.

      NOW THEREFORE, the Borrowing Agreement is amended as follows:

      1.  Each capitalized term used in this Amendment (and not otherwise     
          defined herein) shall have the same meaning as set forth in the 
          Borrowing Agreement.

      2.  Section 2.01(a) of the Borrowing Agreement is hereby amended in its  
          entirety and henceforth shall read as follows:

                 (a) Revolving Loan Commitment.  Subject to the terms and    
          conditions of this Borrowing Agreement and relying upon   
          representations, warranties and covenants of Borrower set forth 
          herein, Lender shall make loans (all such loans made pursuant to 
          this Section 2.01(a) being referred to herein collectively as the 
          "Loans") to Borrower at any time and from time to time prior to the 
          Commitment Termination Date, in an aggregate principal amount not 
          exceeding at any one time outstanding $1,000,000,000 (the 
          "Commitment").  Prior to the Commitment Termination Date, Lender 
          shall have no obligation to make advances to the extent any 
          requested advance would cause the principal amount outstanding under 
          the Revolving Notes to exceed the Commitment, provided, that Lender  
          may elect (but shall not be obligated) from time to time to make 
          advances in excess of the Commitment.

      3.  Except as provided herein, the terms and conditions of the Borrowing 
          Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly 
executed as of the date first written above.

SPS TRANSACTION SERVICES, INC.       DEAN WITTER, DISCOVER & CO.

By:/s/ Thomas M. Goldstein           By:/s/ Birendar Kumar

Title: Vice President - Finance      Title: Treasurer
Tenisha GEDDIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3808

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 14, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 14, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A1192. CHARLES W. RUTTER, JR. v. STACY K. RUTTER.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                               59,845
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0       
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,155,525
<PP&E>                                            4,961,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,511,917       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,677,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,473,898
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,677,046
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    182,833
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   28,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (19,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (19,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        

</TABLE>
STATE EX REL. Malcolm WASHINGTON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-kh-2068

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         210,094
<SECURITIES>                                   175,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,535,383
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,726,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,304,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,304,247
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,135,963
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  896,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   145,816
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.21
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
???? and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,359,338
<SECURITIES>                                31,389,314
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,531,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,231,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,829,847      
<PP&E>                                       1,118,679     
<DEPRECIATION>                                 500,340   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,674,799     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,424,842   
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,578
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,109,805     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,674,799
<SALES>                                      1,871,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,871,800         
<CGS>                                        1,876,021     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,876,021     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,368,332      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,531      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,387,133)      
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,387,133)     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,387,133)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
                                  


</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00304

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 96th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 096

- 291366

- 17

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### S COTT 

### ’ S 

### B IG 

### T RUCK 

### S ALES 

### , LLC; D ON 

### ’ S 

### B IG 

### T RUCK 

### S ALES 

### , LLC; D ONALD 

### R. S COTT 

### ; AND 

### J OHNNY 

### A. S COTT 

### , Appel lants

V



### .
A UTOMOTIVE 

### F INANCE 

### C ORPORATION 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On September 17, 2019, we notified appellant s that the trial

- court clerk
responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant s

have not arrange d to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex.
R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant s arranged to pay for the clerk’s

record a nd provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b),

44.3

. Because appellant s have not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record,
we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),
42.3(b), 43.2( f).
Appellant s must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : October 3, 2019
Joseph DIBELLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1917

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

Amanda Peterson of Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.