alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (A) The
financial statements of Back Bay Restaurant Group, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 28, 1997. And is Qualified in its entirety by reference to such (B)
Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                       1,342,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  213,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    644,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,309,000
<PP&E>                                      56,297,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,159,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,125,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,253,000
<BONDS>                                      4,782,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,430,643
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,125,000
<SALES>                                     23,859,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,859,000
<CGS>                                        6,725,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,108,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,038,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                597,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   221,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            376,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   376,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1361 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide or assist in providing an additional vehicle adapted 

for operation by disabled individuals to certain eligible persons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. MEUSER (for himself and Mr. TRONE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide or assist in 

providing an additional vehicle adapted for operation by 

disabled individuals to certain eligible persons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advancing Uniform 

5 Transportation Opportunities for Veterans Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘AUTO for Veterans Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1361 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS TO PROVIDE OR ASSIST IN PROVIDING 

3 ADDITIONAL VEHICLES ADAPTED FOR OPER4 ATION BY DISABLED INDIVIDUALS TO CER5 TAIN ELIGIBLE PERSONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3903(a) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘paragraph 

9 (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(3) The Secretary may provide or assist in providing 

13 an eligible person with an additional automobile or other 

14 conveyance under this chapter if 10 years have elapsed 

15 since the date on which the eligible person received the 

16 immediately previous such automobile, other conveyance, 

17 or assistance under this chapter.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (3) of subsection 

19 (a) of section 3903 of title 38, United States Code, shall 

20 apply with respect to the provision of an additional auto21 mobile or other conveyance that occurs on or after October 

22 1, 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1048 

To prohibit the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2021 

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the transfer or release of individuals detained 

at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 

to the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR RELEASE OF 

4 INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED STATES 

5 NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, 

6 TO THE UNITED STATES. 

7 No amounts authorized to be appropriated or other8 wise made available for the Department of Defense for 

9 any fiscal year may be used to transfer, release, or assist 

10 in the transfer of or release to or within the United States, 

2 

•HR 1048 IH

1 its territories, or possessions Khalid Sheikh Mohammed 

2 or any other detainee who— 

3 (1) is not a United States citizen or a member 

4 of the Armed Forces of the United States; and 

5 (2) is or was held on or after January 20, 

6 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 

7 Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense. 

Æ
J-A16016-20 

NON PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

V. 

TRAVIS LEE PLANK 

Appellant No. 1409 MDA 2019 

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered July 30, 2019 

In the Court of Common Pleas of Adams County Criminal Division at 

No(s): CP-01-CR-0001013-2018 

BEFORE: PANELLA, P.J., STABILE, J., and MUSMANNO, J. 

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY MUSMANNO, J.: FILED MARCH 26, 2021 

I agree with the Majority that, pursuant to Commonwealth v. Au, 42 

A.3d 1002 (Pa. 2012), the interaction between Travis Lee Plank ("Plank") and 

Pennsylvania State Trooper Matthew Hochberg ("Trooper Hochberg") began 

as a mere encounter. However, I believe that the mere encounter escalated 

into an investigative detention. Nevertheless, because the investigative 

detention was supported by reasonable suspicion, I would conclude that the 

interaction between Plank and Trooper Hochberg was lawful. Thus, I concur 

with the result reached by the Majority.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



|(1) | The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                             
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  |                                             
|                   |  | /s/ Mitchell Dann                           
|                   |  | Mitchell Dann                               
|                   |  | Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Rebecca J. Weber                        
|                   |  | Rebecca J. Weber                            
|                   |  | Controller and Director of Finance
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 22

- 1180

___________________________ Tabitha Regina Cain

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Delta

____________

Submitted: August 15 , 2022

Filed: September 6, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Tabitha Cain appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We agree with the

1 The Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred to by consent of the parties, 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).-2- district court t hat substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the adverse
decision. See Kraus v. Saul , 988 F.3d 1019, 1023

- 24 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review).

Specifically, we conclude that (1) the administrative law judge (ALJ) did not err in finding C ain’s visual and mental impairments non

- severe, see Kirby v. Astrue

, 500 F.3d 705, 708

- 09 (8th Cir. 2007) (substantial evidence supported finding that claimant did not have severe mental impairment, as he did not initially allege disability due to mental illness, medical evidence was contradictory, and he had no long

- term m ental health treatment); (2) the RFC determination was supported by substantial evidence, including the diagnostic imaging and testing results, the findings on physical examination, and the state agency consultants’ opinions, see Anderson v. Shalala, 51 F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir. 1995) (substantial evidence supported RFC determination based on opinions of 2 reviewing physicians and ALJ’s independent analysis of medical evidence); and (3) the ALJ did not err by failing to obtain opinion evidence from an unspeci fied treating physician, see Hensley v. Colvin , 829 F.3d 926, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (there is no requirement that RFC finding be supported by specific medical opinion; when medical record is adequately developed, ALJ is not required to seek opinion from trea ting physician). The district court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
1 

OFFICER BROADENING OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM(S) APPLICATION

SECTION I Administrative Information 

1. Name: (Last, First, MI) 2. Last 4 SSN: 3. Email Address:

4. Rank: 5. Date of Rank: 6. Branch/ FA 7. Year Group: 8. Component

9. KD Complete? Yes: No: If no, when? (Enter date projected to be KD Qualified)

SECTION II Broadening Programs and Preferences 

Complete program descriptions and specific application requirements for each program can be found in the Broadening Opportunity Catalog (http://

www.hrc.army.mil/bop). Some programs do not allow multiple applications, if they do, rank them in order of your preference (1, 2, 3, etc). 

PROGRAM APPLICATION DUE DATE PREFERENCE

1LT Army Future Command, Artificial Intelligence Scholar Program

CPT 

PROGRAM APPLICATION DUE DATE PREFERENCE 

HQDA Harvard Strategist Program 1 APR 202

White House Fellowship 

MG James M. Wright MBA Program 

Purdue University Military Research Initiative 

G(1 Wayne A. Downing Scholarship  0$5

Olmsted Scholars Program -8/

*(12PDU1%UDGOH\JCS/OSD/ARSTAF Internship 0$5

Congressional Fellowship 0$5

Army Future Command, Artificial Intelligence Scholar Program -8/

MAJ 

PROGRAM APPLICATION DUE DATE PREFERENCE 

CGSC Interagency Broadening Fellowship -8/

Rand Arroyo Center Fellowship -8/

White House Fellowship  2&7 202

Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies -8/

-8/

-8/

MG James M. Wright, MBA Program -8/

Purdue University Military Research Initiative -8/

Gen Wayne A. Downing Scholarship 0$5

Congressional Fellowship 0$5

SecDef Strategic Thinkers Program -8/

HQDA Harvard Strategist Program 1 APR 202

Wϯ

Congressional Fellowship 0$5

White House Fellowship 0 2&7 202

LTC 

PROGRAM APPLICATION DUE DATE PREFERENCE 

CGSC Interagency Broadening Fellowship -8/

Rand Arroyo Center Fellowship -8/

White House Fellowship 2&7 202

-8/

George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies -8/

-8/

SecDef Strategic Thinkers Program -8/

Y20240110

-8/

-8/

2&7

-8/

Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies 

George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies 

AUSA Fellowship

AUSA Fellowship
2 

SECTION III Mandatory Essays 

Applicants must answer the following questions to successfully complete the application process. Question 1 is limited

to 500 words. Questions 2 and 3 are limited to 200 words or less.

Question 1: What skills, knowledge or behaviors do you possess that would uniquely qualify you to serve in the desired

opportunity or opportunities? (Response is limited to 500 words)

ǀϮϬϮ40110
3 

Question 3: If selected, what will you bring to the Army from attending this opportunity? (If applying for more than one 

broadening program, answer the question as it relates to your first preference)? (Response is limited to 200 words)

SECTION IV Broadening Application Packet Elements 

SECTION V Authentication 

1. Applicant Signature

SIGNATURE: DATE: 

2. Signature of first COL or GO in Chain of Command

SIGNATURE: DATE: 

Question 2: Where do you see yourself in 10 years? (Response is limited to 200 words)

Y40110
EX PARTE Roger Keith THOMPSON

CR-16-0332

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
EX-10.18






Exhibit 10.18




June 5,
2008



Chesapeake Capital Corporation


17th Floor


Richmond Federal Reserve Building


701 E Byrd Street


Richmond, Va 23219






Attention:  Mr. John M. Hoade




     Re:   Management Agreement Renewals



Dear Mr. Hoade:



We are writing with
respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”).  We are extending the term
 of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2009 and all
other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.





	 	•	 	Smith Barney Tidewater Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	AURORA III




Please acknowledge
receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the
attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986.
If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.






Very truly yours,




CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro	 	 
	 

	 	 

 Jennifer Magro

 Chief Financial Officer & Director
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	CHESAPEAKE CAPITAL CORPORATION
	 
	By:

	 	/s/ John M. Hoade
 

	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	Print Name:

	 	John M. Hoade
 

	 	 






JM/sr
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1363 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1363

 To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching 
Policy Act of 1977 to provide for an additional goal of the Agriculture 
  Advanced Research and Development Authority (AGARDA) to enhance the 
      role of agriculture in innovative sustainability solutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2021

 Mr. Neguse (for himself and Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching 
Policy Act of 1977 to provide for an additional goal of the Agriculture 
  Advanced Research and Development Authority (AGARDA) to enhance the 
      role of agriculture in innovative sustainability solutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sustainable Agriculture Research 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL GOAL OF AGARDA TO ENHANCE ROLE OF AGRICULTURE IN 
              INNOVATIVE SUSTAINABILITY SOLUTIONS.

    Section 1473H(b)(2) of the National Agricultural Research, 
Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3319k(b)(2)) is 
amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following:
                    ``(D) to enhance the role of agriculture in 
                innovative voluntary resilience solutions in the United 
                States through the development of agricultural 
                technologies that address--
                            ``(i) the impact of extreme weather on crop 
                        production;
                            ``(ii) the expansion of the potential for 
                        long-term carbon storage through agriculture;
                            ``(iii) increased economic and practical 
                        feasibility for renewable and sustainable 
                        energy on farms and in the agriculture 
                        industry; and
                            ``(iv) increased adoption of voluntary 
                        conservation practices that sequester carbon 
                        and build on-farm climate resilience; and''.
                                 <all>
```
Michael William BOND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Lauren Beth BOND, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2679

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **10 2**  **4**

JULIUS TATE ,
P laintiff

– Appell ant ,

v.
TERESA FRANKLIN, Nurse; DR. STRICKLAND; LT. TURNER; CORPORAL SMITH; MAJOR DUNNIGAN; ORANGE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT , Defen d a nt s – Appell ees .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. N. Carlton Tilley , Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1 : 0 9

- cv - 0 0 23 0

- NCT

- PTS )

Submitted : April 28 , 2011 Decided: May 3, 201 1

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.

Julius Tate , Appellant Pro Se

. Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC , Winston

- Salem, North Carolina; Charles Houston Foppiano, B ATTEN LEE, PLLC, Cary, North Carolina , for Appellee s .
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Julius Tate seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
dismi ssing several of the Defendants from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

-
46 (1949). The order Tate seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense wi th oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Christopher L. WALKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-3707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
RESIDENTS FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY & Barbara Hinkson Craig, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WCI COMMUNITIES, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5005

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 26, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellees' motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is dismissed as from a nonfinal, nonappealable order. See Mcllveen v. Mcllveen, 644 So. 2d 612, 612 (Fla. 2d DCA1994).

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 31.1

Certifications

I, Roland C. Smith, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Office Depot, Inc.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Roland C. Smith
|Name:               |  | Roland C. Smith        
|Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | April 22, 2016