alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882973
<NAME> CHESTNUT PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,750,268
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  247,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,951,478
<PP&E>                                         530,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,800,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,847,377
<BONDS>                                     13,415,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,800,496
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,768,756
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,731,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (662,501)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                515,334
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   515,334
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Eddie WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4733

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 22, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 121 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 121

To provide for the hiring of 200 additional Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 
 Firearms and Explosives agents and investigators to enforce gun laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the hiring of 200 additional Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 
 Firearms and Explosives agents and investigators to enforce gun laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Violence Reduction Resources Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds as follows:
            (1) On average, more than 100,000 people in the United 
        States are shot in murders, assaults, and other crimes and more 
        than 32,000 people die from gun violence annually, including 
        2,677 children under 18 years of age.
            (2) Many of these crimes were committed by people who never 
        should have been able to purchase a gun.
            (3) Each year hundreds of law enforcement officers lose 
        their lives to gun violence, having been shot to death while 
        protecting their communities.
            (4) Millions of guns are sold every year in ``no questions 
        asked'' transactions and experts estimate that 40 percent of 
        guns now sold in the United States are sold without a 
        background check of the purchaser.

SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES 
              AGENTS AND INVESTIGATORS.

    The Attorney General may hire 200 individuals to serve as agents 
and investigators for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and 
Explosives, in addition to any individuals so serving as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE Terry G. BLAND

CR-16-0413

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Orlando Samuel MCKEITHEN v. STATE

CR-15-1218

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Flatwater Studios Standard Location Release

SERIES / PROGRAM TITLE:

PRODUCTION DATE:

Permission is hereby granted to Flatwater Studios to use the property located at:

________________________________________________________________________________ 

for the purpose of photographing and recording scenes for the above program produced by Flatwater 

Studios.

Permission includes the right to bring personnel and equipment onto the property and to remove them after 

completion of the work. The permission herein granted shall include the right, but not the obligation, to 

photograph the actual name connected with the premises and to use such name in the program(s).

The undersigned hereby gives to Flatwater Studios, its assigns, agents, licensees, affiliates, clients, 

principals, and representatives the absolute right and permission to copyright, use, exhibit, display, print, 

reproduce, televise, broadcast and distribute, for any lawful purpose, in whole or in part, through any means 

without limitation, any scenes containing the above described premises, all without inspection or further 

consent or approval by the undersigned of the finished product or of the use to which it may be applied.

Flatwater Studios hereby agrees to hold the undersigned harmless of and free from any and all liability and 

loss that Flatwater Studios, and/or its agents, may suffer for any reason, except that directly caused by the 

negligent acts or deliberate misconduct of the owner of the premises or its agents.

The undersigned hereby warrants and represents that the undersigned has full right and authority to solely 

enter into this agreement concerning the above described premises, and that the undersigned hereby 

indemnifies and holds Flatwater Studios, and/or its agents, harmless from and against any and all loss, 

liability, costs, damages or claims of any nature arising from, growing out of, or concerning the use of the 

above described premises except those directly caused by the negligent acts or deliberate misconduct of 

Flatwater Studios, or its agents.

By: __________________________________________________

Signature of Authorized Property Representative
Harry WALIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. MANATEE HOLDINGS LIMITED, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2281

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 01, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
NGB FOIA Reading Room Record January 5, 2011 Page 1 of 4

NGB FOIA Reading Room Record January 5, 2011 Page 2 of 4

NGB FOIA Reading Room Record January 5, 2011 Page 3 of 4

NGB FOIA Reading Room Record January 5, 2011 Page 4 of 4
Tommy Tyrell JORDAN v. STATE

CR-16-0231

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of American Telstar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Calello,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; And
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: October 23, 2009

By:  /s/ Charles Calello
     -------------------------------------
     Charles Calello- President and
     Chief Executive Officer
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0951 

Post-Focus Draft Revision 2 7/16/2014

AH
#### Cincinnati and Little Rock Slate Co. vs. Bridge & Co.

It is error to join several garnishees in the same writ of garnishment, without allegations of joint liability or indebtedness. *(Thorn & Bolins vs. Woodruff et al,*5 *Arle.*55; *kforeland et al. vs. Pelham,*2 *Png.*338.)

*Writ of Error to Pulaski Circuit Cou/rt.*

Hon. John J. Clendenin, Circuit Judge.

"W"ÁTKiNS & Gallagher, for the plaintiffs.

Mr. Chief Justice English

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Bridge & Shepherd sued out of the Pulaski Circuit Court, a writ of garnishment, reciting that they had recovered a judgment in said court, against Dyer, &c. “And, whereas, it is alleged by said plaintiffs, that they have reason to believe, that David Bender, Mrs. Bebecca Graham, and the Cincinnati .and Little Bock Slate Company, have in their hands and possession, goods and chattels, moneys, and credits and effects, belonging to the said Dyer.” The sheriff was, therefore, commanded to summon the said garnishees to appear, &c., “ to answer what goods, chattels, moneys, credits and effects, they may have in their hands or possession, belonging to said Dyer,” &c.

The writ was returned, executed upon the garnishees.

At the return term, the plaintiffs filed separate allegations against each of the garnishees, in the form following: “And the plaintiffs, by attorney come, and show and suggest to the court here, that said garnishee has in her possession and control, divers moneys, &c., and therefore, propounds to said garnishee, the following interrogatories,” &c. Then follow interrogatories.

The garnishees made default, and the plaintiffs took separate *365judgments against Bender and tlie Slate Company, for the amount of their judgment against Dyer, dismissing as to Mrs. Graham. The Slate Company brought error.

It was error to join the several garnishees in the same writ, without allegations of joint liability or indebtedness, &c., as held in *Thorn*& *Robins vs. Woodruff et*al., 5 *Ark. Rep.*55; *Moreland et al. vs. Pelham,*2 *Eng. Rep.*338.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, &c.

Absent, Mr. Justice Soott.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY

MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS

111 ARMY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20310-0111

 

SAMR-EI (690-12a) 20 January 2023 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION

SUBJECT: Posting Department of the Army Procedures for Reasonable 

Accommodation and Personal Assistance Services

1. In accordance with Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 

U.S.C. 791), and 29 C.F.R. Section 1614.203, reasonable accommodation and personal 

assistance services procedures must be posted on the agency public web site and 

made available to all job applicants and employees in written and accessible formats. 

2. The enclosed document is compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act and 

describes the procedures for reasonable accommodation and personal assistance 

services. The document links to the governing regulation, Army Regulation 690-12. 

Other relevant, informative resources are also listed. The procedures are posted at 

https://www.army.mil/armyequityandinclusion. Commands must ensure the procedures 

are posted or link to the enclosed document to ensure job applicants and employees 

are aware of Department of the Army procedures for reasonable accommodation and 

personal assistance services. 

3. Point of contact is Ms. Rosemary Salak, Disability Program Manager, Army Equity 

and Inclusion Agency. She may be reached via e-mail at: 

rosemary.salak.civ@army.mil. 

Encl Anselm A. Beach

 Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army

 (Equity and Inclusion Agency) 

DISTRIBUTION:

Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army 

Commander 

U.S. Army Forces Command 

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command 

(CONT)
2

DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)

U.S. Army Materiel Command 

U.S. Army Futures Command 

U.S. Army Pacific 

U.S. Army Europe and Africa 

U.S. Army Central 

U.S. Army North 

U.S. Army South 

U.S. Army Special Operations Command 

Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command 

U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command 

U.S. Army Cyber Command 

U.S. Army Medical Command 

U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command 

U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

U.S. Army Military District of Washington 

U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command 

U.S. Army Human Resources Command 

Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy 

Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center 

Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery 

Commandant, U.S. Army War College 

Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency 

CF: 

Director of Business Transformation 

Commander, Eighth Army
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 22, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1503

Lower Tribunal Nos. F82-20079, F82-21104

________________

Goldwire Anderson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa M. Pooler, Judge.

Goldwire Anderson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Micheal D. CAMBRIDGE, Sr., Appellant, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1309

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ACTION LOSS MITIGATION, LLC, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Trustee for First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-FF10, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1679

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 19, 2018]

Evan B. Plotka of Evan B. Plotka, P.L., Hollywood, for appellant.

Shawn Taylor of DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000799171
<NAME>                        Enex Oil & Gas Income Program II - Series 10, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>           
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1995
<CASH>                                         16161
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15715
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36439
<PP&E>                                         1896106
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1387024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 545521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          52795
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     378839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   545521
<SALES>                                        202405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202405
<CGS>                                          68259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               27107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (72)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   25478
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, William B. Yarmuth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Almost Family, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
    most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
    registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

      Date:   March 29, 2007

BY  /s/ William B. Yarmuth
        -----------------------
        William B. Yarmuth
        Chairman of the Board, President &
        Chief Executive Officer
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 23, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01336-CV 

VELETTA COLEMAN, Appellant 

V. 

MEGAN FINLEY-BENTON, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-11963 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Nowell

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s May 30, 2019 judgment. We questioned 

our jurisdiction over this appeal as it appears the notice of appeal is untimely. We instructed the 

parties to file letter briefs addressing the jurisdictional issue. 

When a timely post-judgment motion extending the appellate timetable is filed, a notice of 

appeal is due 90 days or, with an extension motion, 105 days after the date the judgment is signed. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a); 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks 

jurisdiction. See id. 25.1(b). 

The trial court signed the judgment on May 30, 2019. Appellant filed a timely motion for 

new trial on June 28, 2019. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due on August 28, 2019 or, 
 –2– 

with an extension motion, September 12, 2019. See id. 26.1(a); 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of 

appeal on October 31, 2019. 

Although appellant filed a letter brief, nothing in her brief demonstrates our jurisdiction 

over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(a). 

 

191336F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/ 

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

VELETTA COLEMAN, Appellant 

No. 05-19-01336-CV V. 

MEGAN FINLEY-BENTON, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-11963. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. 

Justices Molberg and Nowell participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee MEGAN FINLEY-BENTON recover her costs of this 

appeal from appellant VELETTA COLEMAN. 

Judgment entered December 23, 2019
**Exhibit 32.1**





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Environmental Remediation Holding Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2004 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Sir Emeka Offor, Chairman of the Board of the Company, hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                                     |  |  |                  
|------------------------------------ |  |  | -----------------
|/s/ Sir Emeka Offor                  |  |  | December 28, 2004
|                                     |  |  |                  
|Sir Emeka OfforChairman of the Board |  |