alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1432 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1432

         To authorize the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2021

   Mr. Pocan (for himself, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Garcia of 
Illinois, Mrs. Hayes, Ms. Norton, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Hastings, 
Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Carson, Ms. Meng, and Mr. Suozzi) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                               and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To authorize the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Susan Harwood Training Grant Program 
Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. SUSAN HARWOOD TRAINING GRANT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.

    Section 21 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (c) to read as follows:
    ``(c) The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services, shall (1) provide for the establishment and 
supervision of programs for the education and training of employers and 
employees in the recognition, avoidance, and prevention of unsafe or 
unhealthful working conditions and in employee rights and employer 
responsibilities under this Act and (2) consult with and advise 
employers and employees, and organizations representing employers and 
employees as to effective means of preventing occupational injuries and 
illnesses.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) The Secretary shall create a program known as the Susan 
Harwood Training Grant Program to competitively award grants to 
nonprofit organizations, employer associations, labor unions, and 
institutions of higher education supported by State and local 
governments to provide training and education programs for employers 
and workers on the recognition, avoidance, and prevention of safety and 
health hazards in workplaces and to inform workers of their rights and 
employers of their responsibilities under the Occupational Safety and 
Health Act (including grants to develop or expand the capacity of such 
organizations to provide safety and health training, education, and 
related assistance to the targeted audiences, grants for the training 
of employees and employers on occupational safety and health hazards of 
particular concern or for particular industries, or groups of workers 
at high risk of injury, illness, or exposure to hazards, and grants for 
the development of training materials on particular topics).''.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000099 28-JUL-2016 07:49 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 44 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 44

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         regarding health care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2021

   Ms. McCollum (for herself, Mr. Pocan, Ms. Jayapal, and Ms. Omar) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         regarding health care.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Health care, including care to prevent and treat 
illness, is the right of the people and necessary to ensure the 
strength of the Nation.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET DATED MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S 10-QSB FOR THE
YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      760
<ALLOWANCES>                                       191
<INVENTORY>                                        239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,222
<PP&E>                                           1,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                     853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,658
<BONDS>                                          1,631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,165
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,737)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,717
<SALES>                                            365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   365
<CGS>                                              140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,463)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
oS? 41

) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 4

REGION IX p

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 January 18, 2012 Greg Cox Supervisor, First District San Diego County Board of Supervisors 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 335 San Diego, California 92101 Dear Mr. Cox: Thank youfor yourletter dated December

1, 2011 regarding the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit for the Pio Pico Energy Center (PPEC). This facility
is proposed
tobe a300 MW power plant consisting of three natural gas-fired combustion turbine generators,
tohe located in an unincorporated areaof San Diego County known as Otay Mesa. We received

aPSD application on September 21, 2011 and weare currently reviewing
it. The facility would be anew major stationary sourceunder the PSD program. My staff is working diligently
to review the technical material submitted by the applicant. Please be assured that wewill processthe application
as quickly as possible. We are working closely with the applicant and its consultants, and met with them onDecember

9, 2011 todiscuss the project and the next stepsin the permitting process. Once wehave all the information weneed to i5rocess the application, wewill develop

adraft permit decision and technical support document and make them available for public review and comment. We trust that this information will be helpful in responding
to yourconcerns.
If wecanbe of further assistance, please contact Roger Kohn of mystaff at 415-972-3973

or kohn.rogerepa.gov Sincerely, 77 //

/ Gerardo C. Rios Chief, Permits Office Air Division
Printed on Recycled Paper
No. 28,594.

#### The Walrus Manufacturing Company, *Appellee,*v. J. C. Quackenbush and Albert Hoff, *Appellants.*

(279 Pac. 3.)

Opinion denying a rehearing filed July 6, 1929.

(For original opinion of affirmance see *ante,*p. 216, 276 Pac. 806.)

*William Keith*and *Lester Wilkinson,*both of Wichita, for appellant Albert Hoff.

*E. L. Foulke*and *Roy II. Wasson,*both of Wichita, for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The original opinion stated the facts, and contained the following:

> “If is plain from the record the defense was that the bond did not cover depreciation in value. That defense is abandoned here, and it is now contended there was no evidence of depreciation.” *(Walrus Manufacturing Co. v. Quackenbush, ante,*p. 216, 276 Pac. 806.)

Appellants have filed a petition for rehearing, which contains the following:

> “In the opinion Justice Burch says that appellant had abandoned this defense. Counsel for appellant certainly did not intend to abandon their contention in this respect, and submit that the question is fairly presented on pages 10 and 11 of appellant’s brief. . . .”

Beginning on page 11 of their brief, appellants also discussed the topic, “Appellee’s theory which prevailed.” The theory which prevailed was that the bond covered depreciation in value, and the discussion concluded as follows:

> “Appellee’s theory of law in the instant case is sound and is supported by the above-quoted authorities. . . .”

*475This accounts for the statement contained in the original opinion relating to abandonment of the defense that the bond did not cover depreciation. The theory of the law which prevailed was sound (24 A. L. R. 1189, annotation), but in view of appellants’ assertion in the petition for rehearing, the statement in the original opinion is withdrawn.

The judgment in the replevin action was for possession of the property, or its value, $440. When the property was returned it was worth very much less than $440. The judgment could not be satisfied, except in hollow appearance, by return of property which had depreciated in value during the time it was withheld by virtue of the bond. The statute contemplates that the property shall be returned in substantially the same condition and of the same value as when taken. *(Fair v. Bank,*69 Kan. 353, 76 Pac. 847; *Motor Co. v. Kline,*109 Kan. 227, 231, 198 Pac. 949.) The bond for return of the property contemplated such a return, and the court now holds that it covered- depreciation in value.

The petition for rehearing is denied.
<PAGE>   1







                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-17030)  pertaining to the 1986 Stock Option Plan; in the Registration
Statements  (Forms  S-8  No.  33-68474,  No. 33-24122,  No. 33-30716 and No.
333-17259)  pertaining  to the  1988 Stock Option  Plan;  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59861)  pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan; in
the Registration  Statements  (Forms  S-8  No. 33-68476  and  No. 333-71971)
pertaining  to the  Stock  Option  Plan for  Nonemployee  Directors;  and in the
Registration  Statements (Forms S-3 No. 33-87948,  No. 333-45803,  No. 333-69317
and No. 333-91441, and Form S-4 No. 33-06901) and in the related Prospectuses of
Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2000 with respect to
the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of Duramed  Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.  included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1999.

                                                  Ernst & Young LLP


Cincinnati, Ohio
March 29, 2000
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 (No.  33-61907)  pertaining to the 1981 Employee Incentive Stock Option
Plan,  1987  Stock  Option  Plan,  1995 Stock  Option  Plan,  1995  Non-Employee
Directors'  Stock Option Plan,  and 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in the
Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-10257) pertaining to the 1995 Stock
Option Plan, as amended, and the 1995 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan,
as amended,  and in the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-8 (Nos.  333-44959,
333-61833)  pertaining  to the 1995 Stock  Option  Plan,  as  amended,  and 1995
Non-Employee  Directors'  Stock Option Plan,  as amended,  and the 1995 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, as amended,  of California Micro Devices Corporation of our
report  dated April 28,  1999,  with  respect to the  financial  statements  and
schedule of California Micro Devices Corporation  included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 1999.


                                                         /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
June 14, 1999
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of
Stater Bros. Holdings Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 28, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company. Date: May 12, 2004 /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman, President, andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)May 12, 2004
 /s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithSenior Vice President, andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 12, 2004
David Gregory COPENHAVER v. STATE

CR-15-0609

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Evelyn CLANTON

NO. 2018-KK-0820

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Denied.
Scott A. HUMINSKI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. TOWN OF GILBERT, Arizona, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4740

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 20, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition and supplement to petition are denied.

Petitioner's motion to stay is denied.

Petitioner's motion and supplement to motion to enjoin orders are denied.

Petitioner's motion and second motion for assistance of counsel are denied.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT A
                              
                     AMENDMENT NUMBER 1
                           TO THE
                    1995 RESTATED BYLAWS
                             OF
                     RENTRAK CORPORATION

     WHEREAS, Section 3.2 of the 1995 Restated Bylaws of
Rentrak Corporation (the "Bylaws") provides that the
Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") shall be
comprised of between three and seven directors, with the
exact number of directors to be established by resolution of
the Board;

     WHEREAS, Article 11 of the Bylaws authorizes the Board
to amend the Bylaws, and the Board believes that it is
desirable and in the Company's best interests to amend
Section 3.2 of the Bylaws to increase the maximum number of
directors from seven to nine; and

     WHEREAS, on February 23, 1998, at a duly convened
meeting of the Board, the Board adopted a resolution
amending Section 3.2 as provided below.

     NOW THEREFORE, the first sentence of Section 3.2 of
Article 3 of the Bylaws is hereby amended in its entirety
and shall read as follows:

          The number of directors of the
          corporation shall be not less than three
          or more than nine, with the number of
          directors to be established by
          resolution of the Board of Directors.

The second paragraph of Section 3.2 of the Bylaws is
unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect.

     Dated as of this 6th day of June, 1998.

                              S/s F. Kim Cox

                              F. Kim Cox, Executive Vice
President,
                              Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary

30086.00100/PDX_DOCS:206285.2
Renee LEONARD, Former Wife, Appellant, v. Scott CURCIO, Former Husband, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1031

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017 Rehearing Denied April 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 30 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 30

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2021

Mr. Green of Tennessee submitted the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total expenditures for any fiscal year shall not 
exceed total receipts for that fiscal year. Such total expenditures do 
not include those for repayment of debt principal and such total 
receipts may not include those derived from borrowing.
    ``Section 2. For a national emergency, two-thirds of each House of 
Congress may for limited times authorize expenditures exceeding those 
pursuant to rules established under section 1. Debts incurred from such 
expenditures shall be paid as soon as practicable.
    ``Section 3. Before each fiscal year, the President shall transmit 
to the Congress a proposed budget for such fiscal year for the 
Government in which total expenditures do not exceed total receipts. If 
the President fails to perform the duty imposed by this section, any 
executive actions may be unilaterally overturned by a simple majority 
vote of each House of Congress until the date on which the President 
submits the proposed budget to Congress.
    ``Section 4. The limit on the debt of the United States held by the 
public shall not be increased unless two-thirds of each House of 
Congress provides by law for such an increase by a roll-call vote.
    ``Section 5. For purposes of section 2, a national emergency occurs 
whenever a declaration of war is in effect or whenever Congress adopts 
a concurrent resolution declaring a national emergency.
    ``Section 6. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by 
appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 7. This article shall take effect beginning with the 
tenth fiscal year after its ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
FOIA Requested Record #J-11-0105 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 1 of 1

(b) (6)

Posted to NGB FOIA Reading Room 

January 17, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Airlease Ltd., A California
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), I, David B. Gebler, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President of Airlease Management Services, Inc., the
General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Partnership.


Dated: March 18, 2004            /s/ DAVID B. GEBLER
                                 _______________________________________________
                                 David B. Gebler
                                 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO AIRLEASE LTD., A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND WILL BE RETAINED BY AIRLEASE LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-43138, 33-61907, 33-10257, 333-44959, 333-61833, 333-69268, 333-90919, 333-88250, and 333-102199) pertaining to the 1981Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1987 Stock Option Plan, 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1995 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, CEO Option Program, VP Sales OptionProgram and VP Finance & Administration Option Program of California Micro Devices Corporation of our report dated May 8, 2003 (except for the second paragraph of Note 9, as to which the date is June 26, 2003), with respect to the 2003financial statements and schedule of California Micro Devices Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2004. 

 

San Jose, California 

June 9, 2004
Bacari Cameron Kenyate DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5642

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.