alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 16 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 16

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
   Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
  Northern Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, and the Italian Republic of 
                 certain defense articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2021

Mr. Meeks (for himself, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Lieu, Mr. Khanna, 
Ms. Lee of California, and Mr. McGovern) submitted the following joint 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
   Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
  Northern Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, and the Italian Republic of 
                 certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of a 
manufacturing license, technical assistance license, or export license 
with respect to any of the following proposed agreements or transfers 
to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
Northern Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, and the Italian Republic is 
prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including defense services and technical data, described in 
        Transmittal No. 19-105, submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        subsections (c) and (d) of section 36 of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776):
                    (A) Assembly, design, development, intermediate 
                level maintenance, manufacture, modification, 
                operation, repair, testing, and demilitarization of 
                components for and full systems of Paveway II, Enhanced 
                Paveway II, Paveway III, Enhanced Paveway III, and 
                Paveway IV Weapons Systems for the Royal Saudi Air 
                Force F-15, Tornado, and Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft.
                    (B) The transfer of 7,500 additional full-up-rounds 
                of Paveway IV to Saudi Arabia.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 1 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 2 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 3 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 4 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 5 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 6 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 7 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 8 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 9 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 10 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 11 of 12

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 12 of 12
DP TRANSPORTATION, INC., Appellant, v. TFS RECOVERY, INC., and Nation's First Capital LLC, d/b/a Go Capital, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-489

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX-10.7





June 5, 2008



Exhibit 10.7



Warrington Management, L.P.

12377 Merit Drive — Suite 800

Dallas, Texas 75251-2296



Attention: Mr. Scott C. Kimple





				
	 	Re:	 	Management Agreement Renewals





Dear Mr. Kimple:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2009 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.




	 	•	 	Smith Barney Warrington Fund L.P.





Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have
any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.



Very truly yours,



CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC



	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	 /s/ Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Jennifer Magro

Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 






WARRINGTON MGT., LP




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Scott Kimple
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Print Name:

	 	Scott Kimple
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 




JM/sr
Extension of Executive Employment Agreement, Almis Kuolas



 Exhibit 10.24 
 EXECUTION COPY 
 EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Extension”) is made as of February 28, 2009 by and between Atlantic Broadband Management, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and Almis Kuolas (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered an
Executive Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) which will expire on February 28, 2009; 
 WHEREAS the Company and
Executive desire to enter into a new employment agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to extend the terms of the Agreement on an interim
basis for a period of six months to allow parties sufficient time to enter a new agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 Section 1. Extension of Employment Period The Employment Period shall be extended for a period of six months, beginning on the date of this Extension, unless terminated earlier under the provisions of Section 5
(a) (ii) – (iii) or by execution of a new employment agreement by Company and Executive. The term “fifth anniversary” is amended to read “fifth anniversary plus six months” wherever it appears in the
Agreement. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unamended. 
 Section 2. Retroactive Effect The terms and consideration as agreed to
by Company and Executive in a new employment agreement to be entered into following the date hereof shall apply retroactively to March 1, 2009. 
 Section 3. Capitalized Terms Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement. 
 Section 4.
Governing Law. Issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Extension will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any
choice of law or conflict of law rules or provisions (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware. In furtherance of the foregoing, the
internal law of the State of Delaware will control the interpretation and construction of this Extension, even though under Delaware’s choice of law or conflict of law analysis, the substantive law of some other jurisdiction would ordinarily
apply. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension of Executive Employment Agreement as of the date
first written above. 
  

			
	ATLANTIC BROADBAND MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	
	
	  

	Almis Kuolas
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1133 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include certain employment 

as a health care practitioner as eligible for public service loan forgiveness, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2021 

Mr. HARDER of California (for himself, Mr. OBERNOLTE, Mr. CASTRO of 

Texas, and Mr. TAYLOR) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include 

certain employment as a health care practitioner as eligible for public service loan forgiveness, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF 

4 PUBLIC SERVICE LOAN FORGIVENESS. 

5 Section 455(m)(3) of the Higher Education Act of 

6 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)(3)) is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1133 IH

1 ‘‘(C) FULL-TIME JOB AS HEALTH CARE

2 PRACTITIONER.—For purposes of subparagraph 

3 (B)(i), the term ‘full-time professionals engaged 

4 in health care practitioner occupations’ includes 

5 an individual who— 

6 ‘‘(i) has a full-time job as a health 

7 care practitioner; 

8 ‘‘(ii) provides medical services in such 

9 full-time job at a nonprofit hospital or pub10 lic hospital or other nonprofit or public 

11 health care facility; and 

12 ‘‘(iii) is prohibited by State law from 

13 being employed directly by such hospital or 

14 other health care facility.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6643-6644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02336]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11646]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Alberto Giacometti: Toward 
the Ultimate Figure'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Alberto Giacometti: Toward the 
Ultimate Figure'' at the Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio; the 
Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, Washington; the Museum of Fine Arts, 
Houston, in Houston, Texas; the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas 
City, Missouri; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of

[[Page 6644]]

State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb889e988f929495c9cfcec2bb888f9a8f9ed59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3142545245585e5f030504087142455045541f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW 
(SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-02336 Filed 2-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 The Honorable Thomas D. Thalken, Unite d States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska, to whom the case was referred fo r final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2421

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the $6,586.05 in United States Currency, * District of Nebraska. * Defendant, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Roger John Parker, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 2, 2006 Filed: June 13, 2006

___________ Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Claimant Roger Parker appeals the district court’s 1 adverse judgment in this civil forfeiture action. After a bench trial, the court found that the government met its burden of proving that the seized currenc y was substantially connected to drug--2- trafficking activity and that the money was not derived from legitimate sources. Parker’s assertion that the district court l acked jurisdiction to hear his case is without merit because he consented to proceed be fore a magistrate judge. Accepting the district court’s factual findings and evidentiary rulings as correct, see Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1)-(2); Meroney v. Delta Int’l Mach. Corp. , 18 F.3d 1436, 1437 (8th Cir. 1994); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners , 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied , 484 U.S. 1071 (1988), we concl ude the district court’s judgment was proper, seeUnited States v. $117,920.00 , 413 F.3d 826, 829 (8th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
## From Boucher Michael 

### Sent Friday January 

## 30 2009 

### 143

# AM

# GMT To crosetto.thornasepa.gov 

# Cc Boucher Michael 

### rnboucherrnckennalong corn Subject Nalco Cornpany 

### Dear

## MrCrosetto This is

# mysecond message to 

## you Didyou receive our 

## UPS Next 

## Day Air

### package containing 

### documentation of apparent 

## FIFRA violations 

### by Nalco 

## Company which isheadquartered in 

## Chicago look 

### forward to 

### your reply 

### Thank 

## you Sincerely Michael 

### Boucher Counsel to 

### Buckman Laboratories Inc

McKENNA LONG ALDRIDGE LLP Attorneys at Law Michael Boucher 1900 Street 

## NW Suite 100 Tel 202 496-7729 Washington D.C 20006-1102 Fax 202 496-7756 United States of America Cell 202 306-1645 Tel 202 496-7500 mbouchermckennalonq.com http//www.mckennalonq.com

ALBANY ATLANTA BRUSSELS DENVER LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PHILADELPHIA SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON D.C
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Oncologix Tech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Michael A. Kramarz, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Michael A. Kramarz	

Michael A. Kramarz

Chief Financial Officer

November 30, 2011

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as partof the Report.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 10.9    
    


 Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

Named Executive Officer Base Compensation at March 1, 2009  


        This Exhibit discloses the current understandings with respect to base compensation between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") and each of: 



	•
	the Company's principal executive officer (Mary G. Puma),   



	•
	the Company's principal financial officer (Stephen G. Bassett), and   



	•
	the three most highly compensated other executive officers serving as executive officers at December 31, 2008. 




        These
executive officers are referred to herein as "named executive officers" or "NEOs." 


        Other
than in the case of Mary G. Puma, the Company has not entered into any written agreements with its named executive officers addressing the amount of base salary due to the
executive. The Company's Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Ms. Puma is listed as Exhibit 10.11 to this Form 10-K (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 filed on November 8, 2007). The Company maintains that all executive officers,
other than Ms. Puma, are employees at will and that the Company has no obligation to continue their employment, other in cases where such obligation arises under the Change of Control
Agreements described in our Proxy Statement and filed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K. 


        In
the course of the employment relationship with each NEO, the Company communicates to the named executive officer the amount of base salary approved by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors, which compensation is subject to change in the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The following table sets forth the annual base salary as
communicated to the named executive officers of the Company as in effect on March 1, 2009: 



							
	Named Executive Officer 	 	Title 	 	Base Salary 	 
	Mary G. Puma	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	$	500,000	 
	Stephen G. Bassett	 	Executive VP and Chief Financial Officer	 	$	300,000	 
	Matthew Flynn	 	Executive VP, Global Customer Operations	 	$	350,000	 
	Lynnette C. Fallon	 	Executive VP HR/Legal and General Counsel	 	$	305,000	 
	Kevin Brewer	 	Executive VP, Manufacturing Operations	 	$	300,000	 






        The
Company has announced 4 weeks of unpaid shutdown in 2009, which will effectively reduce each of the executive officers' base pay by 7.7% in 2009. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.9
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Edward Bernard S.1,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:18cv601

Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed 

by the Magistrate Judge on September 1, 2022 (Doc. 30). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file 

objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th 

Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 30) have been filed

and the time to do so has expired.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 30) of the Magistrate Judge is 

hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge,

Plaintiff’s counsel’s application (Doc. 27), as amended (Doc. 28), is GRANTED in the 

amount of $8,557.50 under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and Plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED to

1 Pursuant to General Order 22-01, due to significant privacy concerns in social security cases, any opinion, order, 

judgment or other disposition in social security cases in the Southern District of Ohio shall refer to plaintiffs only 

by their first names and last initials

Case: 1:18-cv-00601-MRB-KLL Doc #: 31 Filed: 09/28/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1182
2

remit $4,500.00 of this sum directly to plaintiff upon receipt.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge

United States District Court

Case: 1:18-cv-00601-MRB-KLL Doc #: 31 Filed: 09/28/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1183
Sherivonne BROWN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Joe LOUISSAINT, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-1591

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 4, 2017

d0327

Order 

Clerk

April 4, 2017

153661(46)

DONALD J. RHODA Guardian/Conservator of

TREVOR RHODA, and TAMMIE WALKER,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 153661

COA: 321363 

Marquette CC: 13-051044-NI

PETER E. O’DOVERO, INC. d/b/a

MARQUETTE MOUNTAIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 13, 

2017 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Sammy James DOUSE, DOC #990797, Appellant, v. Mike CARROLL, Secretary, Department of Children and Families, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5425

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.