alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hrach VOSKANYAN, d.b.a. Vosk International Co., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZAO GRUPPA PREDPRIYATIJ OST, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-36055

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 21, 2017 *

Filed February 23, 2017

Hrach Voskanyan, Pro Se

*520Before: GOODWIN,- LEAVY, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this- case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hrach Voskanyan, sole proprietor of Vosk International Co. (“Vosk”), appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in Vosk’s action appealing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeals Board’s (“TTAB”) denial of Vosk’s applications to register three trademarks. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *S. Cal. Darts Ass’n v. Zaffina,*762 F.3d 921, 926 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Vosk failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether it had established priority of use of the relevant marks in connection with the involved goods. *See id.*at 930 (explaining how a party may establish “priority of use in commerce”). First, Vosk did not provide evidence that Zao Gruppa Predpriyatij Ost (“Zao”) committed any violation invalidating Zao’s 2001 priority date. *See CreAgri, Inc. v. USANA Health Sci., Inc.,*474 F.3d 626, 630 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[Ojnly *lawful*use in commerce can give rise to trademark priority.”). Second, Vosk’s contention that it acted as a buyer and subsequent owner, rather than, a distributor, of the marks in 2004 and 2006 is irrelevant to Zao’s 2001 priority date. Finally, Vosk did not provide evidence that Zao’s assignment of rights to Aqua-Life was invalid.

We reject Vosk’s contention that the district court erroneously deferred to the TTAB’s findings because, regardless of which standard of review should have applied, Vosk’s new evidence was not relevant to any disputed question of fact. *See Kappos v. Hyatt,*566 U.S. 431, 132 S.Ct. 1690, 1701, 182 L.Ed.2d 704 (2012) (in an analogous scheme in patent law, “if new evidence is presented on a disputed question of fact, the district court must make *de novo*factual findings”). Vosk’s evidence showing that Zao may have violated FDA regulations starting in 2005 is irrelevant to the question of priority, as is its evidence purporting to show that Vosk was not Zao’s distributor in 2004 and 2005, and Vosk provided no evidence that the trademark assignment to Aqua-Life was invalid.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is iiot appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 10.7.3**

 

 

**Employment Arrangements with William H.Henderson**

 

America’sCar-Mart, Inc. (the “Company”) has a written employment agreement with WilliamH. Henderson.  This agreement is filed asExhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended July 31, 2003.  Mr. Hendersonreceives an annual salary of $255,000 per year and a quarterly bonus equal to1.0% of the Company’s net income during such period.  In addition to the benefits described in hisemployment agreement, Mr. Henderson is entitled to the following fringebenefits:  use of a company car, cellphone service, long-term disability insurance, health insurance for him and hisfamily and payment of health or country club dues.  The Company did not make any payments fordues to a health or country club or long-term disability insurance for Mr.Henderson during fiscal 2005.  Mr.Henderson’s salary, bonus and fringe benefits are subject to adjustment at thediscretion of the Company’s board of directors and price increases.

 

----
Petrie and Bertha THOMPSON v. The CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, L.L.C., Bernard Gaudin, PNP, Henry M. Peltier, M.D., Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company, and American Casualty Company OP Reading, Pennsylvania

NO. 2018-C-0583

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.

CLARK, J., would grant.
First Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan - Lee Brady



 Exhibit 10.5 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 THE LA PORTE SAVINGS BANK 
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT 
 DATED AUGUST, 1, 2002 
 FOR 
 LEE BRADY 
 THIS AMENDMENT executed on this 9th day of September, 2003, by and between THE LA PORTE
SAVINGS BANK, a state chartered commercial bank located in La Porte, Indiana (the “Company”), and LEE BRADY (the “Executive”). 
 On August 1, 2002, the Company and the Executive executed the SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”). 
 Pursuant to the power of amendment reserved by Article 7 of the Agreement, the undersigned hereby amends, in part, said Agreement for the purposes of: (i) changing the vesting schedule. Therefore, 
 Section 2.1.3 shall be added to the Agreement as follows: 
 The benefit amount is subject to a vesting schedule of zero percent (0.0%) in the first Plan Year, and one hundred percent (100%) thereafter. 
 IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Executive and the Company have agreed to this First Amendment. 
  

									
	Executive:	 		 	Company:
			
		 		 	THE LA PORTE SAVINGS BANK
				
	 /S/    LEE BRADY

  
	 		 	By	 	/S/    RUSS KLOSINSKI
		 	Lee Brady	 		 	Title	 	Executive Vice President
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1231 

To prohibit the reentry of the United States into the Joint Comprehensive 

Plan of Action unless the President makes certain certifications relating 

to Iran, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2021 

Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the reentry of the United States into the Joint 

Comprehensive Plan of Action unless the President 

makes certain certifications relating to Iran, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Constraining Human 

5 Rights Offenders in the Middle East Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘CHROME Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1231 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REENTRY INTO THE JCPOA. 

2 The President may not take any action relating to 

3 the re-entry of the United States into the Joint Com4 prehensive Plan of Action signed at Vienna on July 14, 

5 2015, by Iran and by France, Germany, the Russian Fed6 eration, the People’s Republic of China, the United King7 dom, and the United States (including all implementing 

8 materials and agreements related to the Joint Comprehen9 sive Plan of Action), unless the President certifies to Con10 gress each of the following: 

11 (1) No waiver or suspension of a sanction 

12 waived or suspended pursuant to such re-entry will 

13 operate to the benefit, directly or indirectly, of any 

14 organization or any member of an organization des15 ignated as a foreign terrorist organization under sec16 tion 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

17 U.S.C. 1189). 

18 (2) No waiver or suspension of a sanction 

19 waived or suspended pursuant to such re-entry will 

20 operate to the benefit, directly or indirectly, of any 

21 individual or entity of the Government of Iran that 

22 has engaged in the gross violation of human rights, 

23 such as the commission of torture, the killing of 

24 peaceful protestors, or the persecution of homosexual 

25 persons. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
M & M MAINTENANCE OF TAMPA BAY INC., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, Appellee.

No. 1D17-424

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 2018

Robert E. Biasotti of Biasotti Law, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Jonathan Anthony Martin, Senior Attorney, of the Department of Financial Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf and Wetherell, JJ., and Forst, Alan O., Associate Judge, concur.
Alkylphenols and Ethoxylates Research Council 

Meeting with 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

September 14, 2012 

10:00 – 11:00 am EDT 

LIST OF ATTENDEES

Alkylphenols & Ethoxylates Research Council (APERC) Attendees 

Barbara S. LOSEY 

Deputy Director 

Alkylphenols & Ethoxylates Research Council 

Dr. William WOLFRAM 

Director-Global Regulatory Affairs 

SI Group, Inc. 

Dr. Severin MUELLER 

Director- Product Toxicology & Regulations Europe & Middle East 

SI Group – Switzerland GmbH 

Ben RADTKE 

The Dow Chemical Company 

Global Product Stewardship Specialist, Surfactants 

Dr. Katie COADY 

Toxicology Consulting Specialist 

The Dow Chemical Company 

Dr. Charles A. STAPLES 

Assessment Technologies, Inc. 

Environmental Consultant to Alkylphenols & Ethoxylates Research Council 

Dr. Thomas G. OSIMITZ 

Science Strategies LLC 

Toxicology and Human Health Consultant to Alkylphenols & Ethoxylates Research 

Council 
Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) Attendees

Sarah E. AMICK 

Environmental Counsel 

Rubber Manufacturers Association 

Tracey NORBERG 

Senior Vice President 

Rubber Manufacturers Association
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        FIRST USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                       THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER, 1996

                  (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended September 30,
                                                   --------------------------------
                                                          1996          1995

                                                      -----------    -----------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C> 
Primary
-------
Net income                                            $    64,056    $    54,895
                                                      ===========    ===========
Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding
      Average common shares outstanding                60,739,156     58,947,192
      Common stock equivalents:
         Stock options                                  2,231,186      2,635,976
         Mandatory convertible preferred stock          4,791,475      4,791,475
                                                      -----------    -----------
      Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares                             67,761,817     66,374,643
                                                      ===========    ===========

Net income per share                                  $      0.95    $      0.83
                                                      ===========    ===========

Fully diluted
-------------
Net income                                            $    64,056    $    54,895
                                                      ===========    ===========
Weighted average common and common
   equivalent shares outstanding
      Average common shares outstanding                60,739,156     58,947,192
      Common stock equivalents:
         Stock options                                  2,386,318      2,917,256
         Mandatory convertible preferred stock          4,791,475      4,791,475
                                                      -----------    -----------
      Weighted average common and common
         equivalent shares                             67,916,949     66,655,923
                                                      ===========    ===========

Net income per share assuming full dilution           $      0.94    $      0.82
                                                      ===========    ===========

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 5815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR22-19-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: COH SOC 
Rates effective 12-30-2021 to be effective 12/30/2021.
    Filed Date: 1/26/2022.
    Accession Number: 20220126-5101.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/16/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-497-000.
    Applicants: Boardwalk Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: GMS Pro Forma ``Go Live'' Tariff 
Records to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 1/26/22.
    Accession Number: 20220126-5064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/7/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 27, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-02143 Filed 2-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Shantelle FORD, Appellee v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee John Paprcka and James T. Bovino, Appellants

No. 16-7114

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: March 29, 2017

l:13-cv-01960-RMC

. John F. Pressley, Jr., Esquire, Attorney, Law Office of John F. Pressley, Jr., Washington, DC, Carl James Schifferle, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, District of Columbia, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Loren L. AliKhan, Deputy Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General, District of Columbia, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee District of Columbia

Todd Sunhwae Kim, Solicitor General, Carl James Schifferle, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, District of Columbia, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellants John Paprcka, James T. Bovino

ORDER

Upon consideration of appellants’ consent motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted and this case be dismissed.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith to the district court.
George Edward KING, Jr. v. JoAnn LEE

2160144

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 07/07-0112]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 07/07-0112 issued to Eagle Fund II, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2022-02222 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 24.7
 
 STATE OF ARKANSAS         §
 COUNTY OF BENTON            §
 
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
 Know all men by these presents, that I, ROBERT CAMERON SMITH, a Director of AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this_18th day of June, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ Robert Cameron Smith
 ROBERT CAMERON SMITH
 
 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 
 Before me this 18th day of June, 2010, came Robert Cameron Smith, personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.
 
 
 /s/ Jill Bright
 NOTARY PUBLIC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                             689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,590
<INVENTORY>                                     15,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,734
<PP&E>                                          57,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,080
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,938
<SALES>                                         75,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,522
<CGS>                                           36,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,405
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,067
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,842)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,960)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (14,201)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,161)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.64)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

##### ***Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm***

 

 

We have issued our reportsdated July 12, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements andmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting included in the Annual Report of America’s Car-Mart, Inc. on Form10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports inthe Registration Statements of America’s Car-Mart, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos.33-59519, 33-59527, 33-41960, 33-22590, 33-71090, and 333-38475).

 

 

GrantThornton LLP

 

 

Dallas,Texas

July12, 2005

 

----
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this                certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies                with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Exchange                Act; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|
| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                                            |                                 |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                            |
|                                 |                                                       |                            |
| Date: February              11, 2008 | By:                                                   | /s/              Clinton H. Severson |
|                                      | Clinton              H. Severson                                |
|                                      | President              and              Chief Executive Officer |

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

PHILLIP MOUNT, DOC #H27909, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2467

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 6, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge.

Joseph A. Caimano, Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.