alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State ex rel. Beck v. Indus. Comm., 122 Ohio St.3d 33, 2009-Ohio-2365.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . B ECK ET AL ., A PPELLANTS , v . I NDUSTRIAL C OMMISSION OF O HIO ET AL ., A PPELLEES . [Cite as State ex rel. Beck v. Indus. Comm., 122 Ohio St.3d 33, 2009-Ohio-2365.] Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. (No. 2008-0707

— Submitted April 21, 2009

— Decided May 27, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 04AP-1094.

__________________ {¶ 1} Appellants appeal from a judgment of the court of appeals denying a request for a status conference for a purported class. {¶ 2} Appellants filed an original action in the Tenth District Court of Appeals seeking a writ of mandamus and certification of the case as a class action. On December 19, 2006, the court of appeals granted the writ but denied appellants’ request to certify the class. State ex rel. Beck v. Indus. Comm.
, Franklin App. No. 04AP-1094, 2006-Ohio- 6730. Appellants did not file an appeal from the ruling denying certification of the class. {¶ 3} In February 2008, appellants filed in the court of appeals a motion for a status conference to review appellees’ actions with regard to all of the
individuals who would have been in the cl ass had the class been certified. Noting that it had not upheld the request for cl ass certification, the court of appeals
denied the motion for status confer ence on February 29, 2008. This appeal
followed. {¶ 4} Appellants seek essentially through their appeal to now have the
class certified. But the time for consideration of that matter expired in early 2007, when appellants failed to timely appeal from the court of appeals’ denial of classS UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 certification, and this appeal is simply an attempt to circumvent the finality of that previous ruling. {¶ 5} Accordingly, as this court has no jurisdiction to now consider class certification, this cause is dismissed.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ Equal Justice Foundation and Judith B. Goldstein, for appellants. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Elise Porter and Andrew J. Alatis, Assistant Attorneys General, for appe llees Industrial Commission of Ohio and Bureau of Workers’ Compensation.

__________________
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

I, William B. Yarmuth, Chief Executive Officer of Almost Family, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: March 6, 2009 | By   /s/ William B. Yarmuth                                          |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | William B. Yarmuth

Chairman of the Board,

President & Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

 

A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
EXHIBIT 99












Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm









Oncologix Tech, Inc.


Grand Rapids, Michigan




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration Statement as filed on May 29, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Oncologix Tech, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2010.




We also consent to the reference to us under the caption “Experts” in the aforementioned Registration Statement.














/s/  CHISHOLM, BIERWOLF, NILSON & MORRILL, LLC






Bountiful, Utah




March 7, 2011
|                                                          |   |   |   |                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|             Date: June 15, 2009 |   | By:    |   | /S/    ROBERT      V. DICKINSON  |
|                                                          |   |   |   | _________________________________________            |
|                                                          |   |   |   | Robert      V. Dickinson                             |
|                                                          |   |   |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                                                          |   |   |   |                                                 |
|                                                          |   |   |   |                                                 |
|             Date: June 15, 2009 |   | By:    |   | /s/    KEVIN      J. BERRY       |
|                                                          |   |   |   | _________________________________________            |
|                                                          |   |   |   | Kevin      J. Berry                                  |
|                                                          |   |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer                         |

|   | This      certification accompanies this periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended      or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Federal Securities      Act of 1933, as amended or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically      incorporates it byreference. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Yassine OUASSINI, Appellant, v. ROGUE SALES, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3284

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32486

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Alexander B. BERRY

Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 15 May 2018

________________________

Military Judge: Brian D. Teter.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 20 September 2017 by SpCM convened at Luke Air Force 

Base, Arizona.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Garrett M. Condon, USAF; Captain 

Meghan R. Glines-Barney, USAF.

For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen 

Payne, Esquire.

Before HARDING, SPERANZA, and HUYGEN, Appellate Military 

Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 

59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). 
United States v. Berry, No. ACM S32486

2

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND ON
PAGES F-3 THROUGH F-6 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE
30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996 
<CASH>                                          45,385 
<SECURITIES>                                    33,645 
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,845,780 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                  3,998,991 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,478,560 
<PP&E>                                     111,420,486 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             177,492,287 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,974,720 
<BONDS>                                    108,481,040
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,400,000 
<PREFERRED>                                  7,408,279 
<COMMON>                                         1,214 
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,456,625 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               177,492,287 
<SALES>                                      8,826,252 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           134,011,389 
<CGS>                                        5,773,934 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              118,857,418 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (7,948,091)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,681,899 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,307,091 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                      372,000 
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,746,808 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6182-6183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4498-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Colorado; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

[[Page 6183]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Colorado (FEMA-4498-DR), dated March 28, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on January 7, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Nancy J. 
Dragani, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Tammy L. Littrell as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02254 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 10.17


      FORM
OF

       

      Amendment

      to
the

      Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan

      Participation
Agreement

       

      This Amendment to the
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Participation Agreement (the “Participation
Agreement”) is entered into as of December 16, 2008, by and between Polonia Bank
and (referred to as the “Bank ”), and [name] (the
“Participant”).

       

      WHEREAS,
the Participant and the Bank entered into the Participation Agreement effective
as of July 1, 2006; and

       

      WHEREAS,
the parties may amend the Participation Agreement by a signed
instrument;

       

      WHERAS,
the parties desire to amend the Participation Agreement to make a clarification
consistent with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.

       

      NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Participation
Agreement as follows:

       

      1.  A
new paragraph (e) is added to the Section 7 to read as follows:

       

      “For
purposes of Sections 7(b) and 7(e) a termination of employment shall occur upon
the date the Participant incurs a “Separation from Service” (as such term is
defined for purposes of Section 409A of the Code)”

       

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have duly executed and delivered this Amendment to the Participation
Agreement, or have caused this Amendment to the Participation Agreement to be
duly executed and delivered in their name and on their behalf, as of the day and
year first above written.

       

      
        
          	
                  POLONIA
      BANK

                	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
                  By:

                	
                    

                	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
                  Title:

                	
                    

                	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
                  PARTICIPANT

                	 
      
	
                    

                	 
      
	
                  Name
The files submitted by Domtar in response to Question #3 are modeling files: 

ASHDOWN-Q3-000001 through ASHDOWN-Q3-000576. For copies of these 

files please contact Dayana Medina at 214-665-7241 or medina.dayana@epa.gov

or Michael Feldman at 214-665-9793 or feldman.michael@epa.gov.
Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 36 Filed: 09/30/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 492
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1347 

To amend section 242 of title 18, United States Code, to forbid the use 

of chokeholds by persons subject to that provision’s prohibitions, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. BEYER, Mr. 

BISHOP of Georgia, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. CARSON, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. 

DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. DEGETTE, Mrs. DEMINGS, Ms. 

ESCOBAR, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. JAYAPAL, Ms. JOHNSON

of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. KEATING, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, 

Mr. KHANNA, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. MEEKS, 

Ms. MENG, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. NORTON, Mr. POCAN, Miss 

RICE of New York, Mr. RUSH, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Ms. SCANLON, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. SWALWELL, Mr. TRONE, Mrs. 

WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. WELCH, Mr. KIM of New Jersey, Mr. LIEU, Mr. 

NEGUSE, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. CROW, Mr. JONES, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mrs. 

TRAHAN, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. COHEN, Mr. 

DEUTCH, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. AGUILAR, Mr. 

MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. HASTINGS, 

Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. BROWN, Mr. CASTEN, 

Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. BASS, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Ms. 

NEWMAN, Mrs. MCBATH, Ms. LOIS FRANKEL of Florida, Mr. SOTO, Ms. 

WILLIAMS of Georgia, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. 

COURTNEY, Mrs. HAYES, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Ms. BOURDEAUX, Mr. 

QUIGLEY, and Mr. MRVAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 242 of title 18, United States Code, to 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1347 IH

forbid the use of chokeholds by persons subject to that 

provision’s prohibitions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eric Garner Excessive 

5 Use of Force Prevention Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHOKEHOLDS AS CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS. 

7 Section 242 of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘For the pur9 poses of this section, the application of any pressure to 

10 the throat or windpipe, use of maneuvers that restrict 

11 blood or oxygen flow to the brain, or carotid artery re12 straints which prevent or hinder breathing or reduce in13 take of air is a punishment, pain, or penalty.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Raymond MARSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2827

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23


Consent of Independent Public Accountants


As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference  of our  reports  included  in this  Form  10-K,  into  the  Company's
previously filed Registration  Statements:  (1) Registration  Statement File No.
33-40472 on Form S-8 of the 1986 Stock  Option  Plan,  the 1985 Stock  Incentive
Plan,  the 1985 Key  Employee  Incentive  Stock  Option Plan and the  Individual
Written  Compensation  Plan dated May 10, 1991, (2) Registration  Statement File
No.  33-44864 on Form S-8 of the 1986 Restated and Amended Stock Option Plan and
Directors' Stock Option Plan dated January 8, 1992, (3)  Registration  Statement
on Form S-8 of the 1992 Employee  Stock  Purchase Plan dated June 16, 1992,  (4)
Registration  Statement  File No.  33-86548 on Form S-3 dated November 21, 1994,
(5)  Registration  Statement  File No.  33-65463 on Form S-3 dated  December 28,
1995,  as amended on  February  9, 1996,  (6)  Registration  Statement  File No.
333-28565 on Form S-8 of the 1997  Non-Officer  Employee Stock Option Plan dated
June 5, 1997,  as amended on October 29, 1997,  and (7)  Registration  Statement
File No.  333-62523  on Form S-8 of the 1997  Equity  Participation  Plan  dated
August 31, 1998.

                                    /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP




Portland, Oregon
June 25, 2001
David I. EPPS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5096

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 23, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Because Petitioner has an adequate remedy by appeal, Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. This denial is without prejudice to any right Petitioner might have to petition for belated appeal of the denial of his postconviction motion.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Iron Bow Technologies, LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91QUZ-07-D-0010 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59181 

James C. Fontana, Esq. 

David B. Dempsey, Esq. 

Dempsey Fontana, PLLC 

Reston, VA 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ James P. Leary, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 12 August 2015 

Administraf e Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59181, Appeal of Iron Bow 

Technologies, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals