alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4630-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4630-DR), dated December 12, 
2021, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued January 6, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective December 11, 2021.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02237 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Order entered July 2, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00070-CV

FLASHDANCER, INC., Appellant

V.

JOHN FULCHER III, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-11379

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal is past due. By postcard dated April 20, 

2021, we notified the Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter for the 193rd 

Judicial District Court, that the reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to 

file the reporter’s record within thirty days. After Ms. Dobbins responded that the 

reporter’s record had not been filed because the record had not been requested nor 

payment arrangements made, we notified appellant. On April 30, 2021, appellant 

responded that it had attempted to obtain information regarding the cost of the 
record, and it was ready to pay for the record. By order dated May 5, 2021, we 

again notified Ms. Dobbins that the reporter’s record was overdue, directed her to 

the January 15, 2021 request for the reporter’s record contained in the clerk’s 

record, and ordered her to file the reporter’s record within thirty days. 

To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and Ms. Dobbins has not 

otherwise communicated with the Court regarding the reporter’s record. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Vielica Dobbins to file, within TWENTY DAYS

of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; or (2) written verification 

that appellant has been notified of the cost of the record and has not yet paid for or 

made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. We notify appellant that if we 

receive verification it has been notified of the cost for the reporter’s record and 

has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, we will 

order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 

37.3(c).

We expressly CAUTION Ms. Dobbins that failure to comply with this order 

WILL result in the Court taking such action as is necessary to have Ms. Dobbins 

comply with the Court’s orders, including an order that she not sit as a court 

reporter until she complies.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

Honorable Bridgett N. Whitmore 

Presiding Judge
134th Judicial District Court 

Vielica Dobbins

Official Court Reporter

134th Judicial District Court

All parties 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,610
<PP&E>                                         157,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          941,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,686
<OTHER-SE>                                   (865,488)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,263
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               178,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (178,057)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        56
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (178,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (178,113)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
____________________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2014.

An appeal from an order of the Public Employees Relations Commission.

Thomas Montgomery of Thomas Montgomery, P.A., Belle Glade , for Appellant.

Kambria Emanuel Anderson, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General

Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Joey D. Rix, Staff Attorney, Public Employees Relations Commission,

Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK

, PADOVANO, and MARSTI LLER , JJ., CONCUR. WARDELL COLEMAN

,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS

,

Appellee. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 3971
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7058

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RENED MARTINEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(6:06-cr-00503-MGL-2; 6:14-cv-00413-MGL)

Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 21, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rened Martinez, Appellant Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr., 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rened Martinez seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Martinez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Flanders Corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, we hereby certify, solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; except for the inclusion of the auditor's opinion of Grant Thornton relating to results of operations for year ended 2001, which report has been previously provided by Grant Thornton in prior filings; and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 23, 2004.





/s/____________________________________

Robert R. Amerson

President and Chief Executive Officer



/s/_____________________________________

Steven K. Clark

Chief Financial Officer
#### John SHELTON *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 73-156

504 S.W. 2d 348

Opinion delivered January 28, 1974

*Don Langston,*for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *James W. Atkins,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant John Shelton was sentenced to four years confinement on a plea of guilty to grand larceny. At the tíme of sentencing he sought credit for time spent in jail. The trial court ordered the commitment pre-dated to give credit for only a part of the time spent in jail. The sole question on appeal is whether appellant was entitled, as a matter of right, to credit for the full time he was incarcerated.

This court has twice been faced with the same question. *Kimble*v. *State,*246 Ark. 407, 438 S.W. 2d 705 (1969); *Harper*v. *State,*249 Ark. 1013, 462 S.W. 2d 847 (1971). In *Kimble,*appellant received less than the maximum sentence. He sought, among other relief, credit for time served in jail prior to trial. On appeal we said: “Appellant argues that he should have been given credit on the present sentence for this amount of time. As to the days served in jail, we do not agree, for we have no statute permitting this to be done”. In *Harper,*we had the same question before us and we ruled as in *Kimble.*Also. see *Gross*v. *Saruer,*307 Fed. Supp. 1105 (E. D. Ark., *9331970). We are further persuaded by legislation on the subject. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-2813 (Supp. 1971). There it is provided that the sentencing judge may *in his discretion*allow credit for time served in jail. It is of considerable significance that the legislature has treated the subject and did not see fit to make the credit mandatory.

We hold that when the sentence imposed plus time served in jail awaiting trial does not exceed the maximum penalty, the prisoner is not entitled as a matter of right, to credit for full time served in jail while awaiting trial.

Affirmed.

Byrd, J., dissents.
Preston DUNN v. STATE

CR-16-0116

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017 Reh. denied March 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
WKTK-FM&WSKY-FM 

3600 NW 43 Street, Suite B 

Galnsfivitle. Florida 32606 

Phone {352) 377-0985 

Fax (352) 377-1884 

August 26, 2010 

- • •'••• " I \ i; : 3 

Aloha Ley 

Associate Director 

Small Community Air Sei'vice Developineitt Program 

aloha, lev@dot.gov 

Re: Small Community Air Service Development Grant 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

WKTK and WSKY fully supports the Gainesville-Alachua County Regional 

Airport Authority's request for a SmaJl Community Air Service 

development grant to help support the new American Eagle Airlines service 

between Gainesville and Miami and the existing local air carriers, Delta Air 

Lines and US Ainvays, We recognize the importance of air sei'vice to 

economic development and the quality of life for residents and visitors in 

our region. 

We want to help ensure the success of the new American Airlines service 

between Gainesville and the Miami hub. We are already working closely 

with the Airport Authority and matching ftmds spent. The lack of air sei'vice 

to South Florida and adequate connecting service to international 

destinations has forced many to commute to and from other airports or make 

the exhausting 5+ hour trip to Miami by automobile. Additionally, 

American's extensive domestic and international route structure from Miami 

will provide new travel options and a greater level of frequency. 

Due to the critical importance of quality air service for our region, we are 

committed to supporting American's new service and continued 

improvement in air service. Therefore, we will match funds spent with 

WKTK and WSKY to help American Airlines establish its new route 

between GNV and MIA. With 179,000 listeners, we believe our donation for 

advertising will help make the new service successful. 

I urge you to proceed with approving the Airport Authority's request for a 

grant to assist with marketing efforts for the next two years. If you have any 

questions about our stations, please feel free to contact me. My direct line is 

352-244-5714. 

Sincerely, 

William E. Morris 

Senior Manager 

Page 64
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, Case No. 2:18-md-2846

INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA.

MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS
Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

This document relates to:
ALL ACTIONS.

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 2-B

Amendment to Procedures for Direct Filing and Pro Hac Vice Admission

This matter is before the Court for clarification of direct filing and pro hac vice procedures
in MDL No. 2846, The Court previously addressed these procedures in Case Management Order
No. 2 (ECF No. 11). This Court ORDERS that the following provisions shall apply henceforth.

A. Direct Filing

Counsel is DIRECTED to file each new case individually, in accordance with the standard
filing procedures of this Court. Accordingly, each new case will be given its own unique “CV”
number for purposes of future identification. When filing a new case, Counsel is DIRECTED to
follow all online prompts and indicate that the case is related to MDL No. 2846. Counsel will be
prompted to pay the required filing fee at the time of filing the complaint.

Any questions regarding the filing process should be directed to Eduardo Rivera at 614-

719-3015, or by email at Eduardo_rivera@ohsd.uscourts.gov.


B. Pro Hac Vice

In cases filed in this Court because of their MDL status, only Counsel who actively practice
before this Court in Bellwether trials, discovery, motion practice, or other appearances are required
to pay the requisite fee to appear pro hac vice. Actively participating Counsel are not required to
file a motion to appear pro hac vice. Rather, they are DIRECTED to remit the requisite fee to the
Clerk’s Office via check. The check must cite the case number of the first case the attorney filed
in this MDL. The check may be addressed to:

Office of the Clerk

Joseph P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse

Room 121
85 Marconi Boulevard
Columbus, Ohio 43215

IT IS SO ORDERED.

I]-,0~ old ENe
DATE EDM SARGUS, JR.

CHIE) ITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

[20] 20 16 AAG

DATE KIMBERLY A; JOLON
UNITED STATE GISTRATE JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAXI GROUP,
INC. DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,475
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,640
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,925
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,090)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,475
<SALES>                                             90
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    90
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,768)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,768)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Wyoming Sulfate Contribution to Theodore Roosevelt

Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

THRO1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 19 WY 0.0243684 3.68E-05 0.0017789 0.0005053 0.0034842 0.0301737

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Sulfate at Theodore Roosevelt = 0.03 divided by 1.6, or 2%

Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

THRO1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 18 WY 0.0111167 2.78E-05 0.0009944 2.22E-05 0.0018556 0.0140167

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Sulfate at Theodore Roosevelt = 0.01 divided by 0.9, or 1%
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 26,
2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman, President, and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 8, 2011/s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithExecutive Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 8, 2011
Ulises CHAVEZ v. BBVA COMPASS BANK

2160096

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Swinkey *v.*Crow.

4-9287

234 S. W. 2d 36

Opinion delivered November 20, 1950.

*O. D. Longstreth, Sr.,*for appellant.

*George W. Shepherd,*for appellee.

Dunaway, J.

Appellant Swinkey brought this action to recover the sum of $100 from appellee Crow as damages for the loss of a cow, which it was alleged was killed through the negligence of Crow.

About dusk on July 29, 1949, appellee 'was driving his automobile in a westerly direction on a gravel road near College Station in Pulaski County when he hit and killed the cow in question. This was one of two cows belonging to appellant which were crossing the highway from north to south at the point where the accident occurred. Appellant alleged that appellee was negligent in driving his automobile at an excessive rate of speed and in a reckless manner while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

Appellee answered with a general denial and pleaded contributory negligence in that appellant knowingly per*908mitted liis stock to run at large iu a Stock Law District in violation of the law.

The case was submitted to the Court sitting* as a jury, which resulted in a judgment for the defendant.

Several witnesses for appellant testified that ap-pellee was driving at the rate of approximately sixty miles per hour a short distance behind another car which had thrown up a cloud of dust. Their testimony was that the lights on appellee’s car were not burning, though it was growing dark.

Appellee and other witnesses in his behalf testified that he was driving at about thirty miles per hour and that he did have his lights on. Appellee’s version of the accident was that he was driving along the highway when appellant’s two cows suddenly jumped or ran from a ditch on the north side of the road and in front of his car. He dodged the first one, and cut his car to the left in an effort to avoid hitting the second one, which he was unable to do.

The Court made written findings of fact, the first of which was as follows: “Prom the evidence submitted the Court found the facts to be that the defendant was guilty of no negligence. ’ ’ On appeal this finding of the Court is treated the same as a jury verdict. Since there is no question of proper instructions in regard to contributory negligence, and there is substantial evidence to support the finding that the defendant was not guilty of negligence, this disposes of the case.

The judgment is affirmed.