United States

Environmental Protection

Agency

Office of Chemical Safety and 

Pollution Prevention

(7510P)

EPA 712-C-07-091

September 4, 2012

Product Performance 

Test Guidelines

OCSPP 810.2300:

Sanitizers for Use on 

Hard Surfaces—Efficacy 

Data Recommendations
NOTICE

 This guideline is one of a series of test guidelines established by the Office of 

Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) (formerly the Office of 

Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) prior to April 22, 2010), 

United States Environmental Protection Agency for use in testing pesticides and 

chemical substances to develop data for submission to the Agency under the Toxic 

Substances Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. 2601, et seq.), the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.), and section 408 of 

the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. 346a), referred to 

hereinafter as the harmonized test guidelines.

The harmonized test guidelines serve as a compendium of accepted scientific 

methodologies and protocols that are intended to provide data to inform regulatory

decisions under TSCA, FIFRA, and/or FFDCA. This document provides guidance 

for conducting appropriate tests, and is also used by EPA, the public, and the 

companies that are subject to data submission requirements under TSCA, FIFRA 

and/or the FFDCA. At places in this guidance, the Agency uses the word “should.” In 

this guidance, use of “should” with regard to an action means that the action is 

recommended rather than mandatory. As a guidance document, these guidelines are 

not binding on either EPA or any outside parties, and the EPA may depart from the 

guidelines where circumstances warrant and without prior notice. The methods 

contained in this guideline are strongly recommended for generating the data that are 

the subject of the guideline, but EPA recognizes that departures may be appropriate in 

specific situations. You may propose alternatives to the methods recommended in 

these guidelines, with your supporting rationale. The Agency will assess such 

proposals on a case-by-case basis. 

For additional information about OCSPP harmonized test guidelines and to 

access the guidelines electronically, please go to http://www.epa.gov/ocspp and select 

“Test Methods & Guidelines” on the left side navigation menu. You may also access 

the guidelines in http://www.regulations.gov grouped by Series under Docket ID #s: 

EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0150 through EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0159, and EPA-HQOPPT-2009-0576.
1

OCSPP 810.2300: Sanitizers for use on hard surfaces - efficacy data 

recommendations. 

(a) Scope

(1) Applicability. This guideline describes test methods that EPA believes will generally 

satisfy testing requirements of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) 

(7U.S.C. 136, et seq.), and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. 

346a). It addresses testing to demonstrate effectiveness of antimicrobial pesticides bearing claims 

for use as sanitizers.

(2) Background. The source materials used in developing this OCSPP test guideline are 

OPP guidelines 91-2: Products for use on hard surfaces and 91-30: Acceptable methods 

(Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision G, Product Performance. EPA report 540/9-82-

026, October 1982). 

(b) Purpose. This guideline addresses efficacy testing for antimicrobial pesticides

intended to be used on hard surfaces, namely sanitizers in a variety of product types (watersoluble powders, liquids, sprays, towelettes, etc.). 

(c) General considerations

(1) This guideline recommends methods for use in tests to be conducted to address the

data requirements for pesticide registration. Good Laboratory Practice Standards (GLP) as 

defined in 40 CFR Part 160 apply to studies to support disinfection on hard, non-porous surfaces. 

According to 40 CFR §160.17: “EPA may refuse to consider reliable for purposes of supporting 

an application for a research or marketing permit any data from a study which was not conducted 

in accordance with this part.” 40 CFR §160.12 (b) requires with any submitted research data “[a] 

A statement that the study was conducted in accordance with this part; [b] A statement 

describing in detail all differences between the practices used in the study and those required by

this part; or [c] A statement that the person was not a sponsor of the study, did not conduct the 

study, and does not know whether the study was conducted in accordance with this part.” Note: 

The Association of Official Analytical Chemicals (AOAC) recommended tests are designed to 

be conducted as written. For deviations (e.g., cultures grown with shaking instead of static, 

dilution of culture prior to drying on carriers) proposed to be used in the conduct of these tests, 

obtain written approval from the Agency and document such deviations in the study reports 

submitted to the Agency. The Agency may consult with the AOAC prior to accepting 

modifications to their standardized methods. Refer to OCSPP Test Guideline 810.2000 for 

general testing recommendations prior to initiating tests.

(2) Confirmatory testing. In certain situations an applicant may rely on previously

submitted efficacy data to support an application or amendment for registration of a product and 

submit only confirmatory efficacy data on his own product to demonstrate his ability to produce 

an effective formulation. These situations are as outlined in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) and (c)(2)(ii) in 

this guideline.
2

(i) Duplicated Product Formulations. In this situation, the applicant manufactures a 

formulation which duplicates a product that is already registered with complete supporting 

efficacy data. The chemical composition, manufacturing procedure, label claims, and directions 

for use are identical in substance to those of the original registration, and specific references 

(Master Record ID Numbers [MRIDs]) to the supporting data developed for the original product 

are cited by the applicant.

(ii) Minor Formulation Change in a Registered Product. In this situation, the change in 

the formulation is relatively minor, e.g., a change of an inert ingredient. The label claims and 

directions for use are unchanged from those accepted for the registered formulation, and specific 

references (MRIDs) to the supporting data developed for the original formulation are cited by the 

applicant. If the only change in the formulation is the addition of a fragrance or dye, 

confirmatory data do not need to be submitted. However, when the product is an aerosol 

formulation, confirmatory data should be submitted for all formulation changes, including the 

addition of fragrances and dyes. 

Table 1. Tests for basic claims described in this guideline. 

Level of 

Efficacy

Test Methods Test Organisms No. of 

Batches/Carriers

Evaluation 

of Success

Non-food 

Contact 

Sanitizer

Water soluble 

powders/liquids

Spray products

ASTM E-1153 Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 

6538) and Klebsiella 

pneumoniae (ATCC 4352) 

Enterobacter aerogenes

(ATCC 13048) may be 

substituted for K. pneumoniae.

Three batches, one at least 60 

days old.

99.9% reduction 

within 5 minutes. 

Towelettes Reserved

Food Contact 

Surface 

Sanitizer

Halide Products

Water soluble 

powders/liquids

AOAC 

International 

Chlorine 

(Available) in 

Disinfectants 

Germicidal 

Equivalent 

Concentration

Salmonella enterica (formerly

typhi) (ATCC 6539) or S. 

aureus (ATCC 6538)

Three batches, one at least 60 

days old.

Test results should 

demonstrate product 

concentrations 

equivalent in activity 

to 50, 100, and 200 

ppm of available 

chlorine.

Food Contact 

Surface 

Sanitizer

Non-Halide 

Products

Water soluble

powders/liquids

AOAC 

International 

Germicidal and 

Detergent 

Sanitizing Action 

of Disinfectants

Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229) 

and S. aureus (ATCC 6538)

Three batches, one at least 60 

days old. 

99.999% reduction 

in the number of 

each test 

microorganism 

within 30 seconds.

Food Contact 

Surface 

Sanitizer

Towelette

Towelettes http://www.epa.g

ov/oppad001/tow

elette

Sanitizers for 

Urinal and Toilet 

Bowl Water and 

In-tank 

Sanitizers

Water soluble 

powders/liquids/tablets

Simulated-use 

study

Enterococcus faecium ATCC 

6569 or Salmonella enterica

(formerly choleraesuis) ATCC 

10708

Three batches, one of which is at 

least 60 days old.

99.9% reduction 

over parallel control 

counts.
3

(iii) The confirmatory data are to be developed from testing the applicant's own finished 

product. When the test methodology utilized in deriving the original supporting efficacy data 

were modified to include additional elements not specified in the recommended method, such as 

organic soil, hard water, longer or shorter contact time, etc., the confirmatory data should be 

produced under similarly modified conditions.

(3) Table 1 provides a quick reference guide to testing for basic claims described in this 

guideline. Consult the text for detailed testing descriptions.

(d) Sanitizers for nonfood contact surfaces (water soluble powders, liquids, and 

spray products). These products, when used as directed, should reduce the number of test 

microorganisms on a treated surface over those of an untreated control surface. The following 

testing recommendations apply to products bearing label claims for effectiveness as sanitizers for 

inanimate hard surfaces other than those which come in contact with food or beverages (e.g., 

floors, walls, furnishings).

(1) Test Procedures. 

(i) The Agency recommends the test procedure in this paragraph: The American Society 

for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method for Efficacy of Sanitizers Recommended for 

Inanimate Non-Food Contact Surfaces (E1153) may be used (Ref. 1). Three product samples, 

representing three different batches, one of which should be ≥60 days old, should be tested 

against each test bacterium on each representative test surface depending on the uses proposed 

on the label. For hard, porous surface label claims use unglazed ceramic tile for hard, nonporous 

surface label claims use stainless steel carrier or glass slide, using 5 test carriers and 3 control 

carriers. The test microorganisms are: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) American Type Culture 

Collection (ATCC 6538) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) (ATCC 4352). 

Enterobacter aerogenes (E. aerogenes) (ATCC 13048) may be substituted for K. pneumoniae.

The ASTM method states “an average of at least 7.5 x 105 organisms must have survived the 

inoculated control squares for the test to be valid.” 

(ii) Evaluation of sanitizing success for nonfood contact surface sanitizers. The results 

should demonstrate a reduction of ≥99.9% (a 3-log10 reduction) in the number of each test 

microorganism over the parallel control count within 5 minutes.

(e) Towelettes. (Reserved.)

(f) Sanitizers for Internal Toilet and Urinal Bowl Surfaces Above and Below the 

Water Line

(1) Test Procedures. The Agency recommends the use of The American Society for 

Residual Selfsanitizing – wet 

surfaces

Simulated-use 

study

Representative gram positive 

and gram negative organisms

Three batches, one at least 60 

days old.

99.9% reduction 

over parallel control 

counts.
4

Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method for Efficacy of Sanitizers Recommended for 

Inanimate Non-Food Contact Surfaces (E1153) may be used (Ref. 1). The contained bowl water 

(96 fl oz which represents traditional high volume toilets) should be used to calculate the 

appropriate use dilution for testing. The water volume in low volume toilet bowls should be 

measured and used to calculate the appropriate dilution for testing.

(2) Evaluation of sanitizing success for toilet and urinal bowl surface sanitizers. The 

results should demonstrate a reduction of ≥99.9% (a 3-log reduction) in the number of each test 

microorganism over the parallel control count within 5 minutes.

(g) Sanitizing rinses (soluble powders and liquids) for previously cleaned foodcontact surfaces. This section addresses efficacy testing for products with a label recommendation for the treatment of previously cleaned, nonporous, food contact surfaces (e.g., 

eating and drinking utensils and food processing equipment) as a terminal sanitizing rinse. 

(1) Halide chemical products. Sanitizing rinses formulated with iodophors, mixed 

halides, and chlorine-bearing chemicals.

(i) Test procedure. The Agency recommends the AOAC International Chlorine 

(Available) in Disinfectants Germicidal Equivalent Concentration test (Ref. 2). Three samples, 

representing three different batches, one of which should be at least 60 days old, should be 

evaluated for efficacy against Salmonella enterica (S. enterica) (formerly Salmonella typhi) 

(ATCC 6539) or S. aureus (ATCC 6538). When claims are made for the effectiveness of the 

product in hard water, all data should be developed at the hard water tolerance claimed.

(ii) Evaluation of sanitizing success of halide formulations. Test results should 

demonstrate product concentrations equivalent in activity to 50, 100, or 200 ppm of available 

chlorine. The reference standard is sodium hypochlorite.

(2) Confirmatory testing for halide chemical products

(i) Test procedure. The Agency recommends the AOAC International Chlorine 

(Available) in Disinfectants Germicidal Equivalent Concentration test (Ref. 2). One sample 

should be evaluated for efficacy against S. enterica (ATCC 6539) or S. aureus (ATCC 6538). 

When claims are made for the effectiveness of the product in hard water, all data should be 

developed at the hard water tolerance claimed. 

(ii) Evaluation of sanitizing success of halide formulations. Test results should 

demonstrate product concentrations equivalent in activity to 50, 100, or 200 ppm of available 

chlorine. The reference standard is sodium hypochlorite.

(3) Non-halide chemical products. Sanitizing rinses formulated with quaternary

ammonium compounds, chlorinated trisodium phosphate and anionic detergent-acid 

formulations.

(i) Test procedure. The Agency recommends the AOAC International Germicidal and 
5

Detergent Sanitizing Action of Disinfectants test (Ref. 3). Three samples, representing three 

different batches, one of which should be at least 60 days old, should be evaluated for efficacy 

against both Escherichia coli (E.coli) (ATCC 11229) and S. aureus (ATCC 6538). When claims 

are made for the effectiveness of the product in hard water, all data should be developed at the 

hard water tolerance claimed. 

(ii) Evaluation of sanitizing success of non-halide formulations. Acceptable results 

should demonstrate a ≥99.999% reduction in the number of each test microorganism within 30 

seconds. The results should be reported according to the actual count and percentage reduction 

over the control. 

(4) Confirmatory testing for non-halide products—(i) Test procedure. The Agency

recommends the AOAC International Germicidal and Detergent Sanitizing Action of 

Disinfectants test (Ref. 3). One sample should be evaluated for efficacy against both E. coli 

(ATCC 11229) and S. aureus (ATCC 6538). When claims are made for the effectiveness of the 

product in hard water, all data should be developed at the hard water tolerance claimed. 

(ii) Evaluation of sanitizing success of non-halide formulations. Acceptable results 

should demonstrate a ≥99.999% reduction in the number of each test microorganism within 30 

seconds. The results should be reported according to the actual count and percentage reduction 

over the control.

(h) Towelette Sanitizers for Food Contact Surfaces. This section addresses efficacy 

testing for products with a label recommendation for the treatment of hard, non-porous surfaces 

which may come into contact with food. Food contact surface (FCS) towelettes are intended to

be used to sanitize the following surfaces: hard non-porous tables, countertops (stainless steel, 

laminated, sealed ceramic) stove tops, interior and exterior surfaces of microwaves and 

refrigerators. FCS towelettes may not be used to sanitize the following food contact surfaces: 

utensils, glasses, food containers, dishes, unfinished wood cutting boards and cutting blocks, 

drain boards and food processing equipment. This list is not meant to be all-inclusive, but to 

serve as general guidance for the appropriate use of this type of antimicrobial pesticide. The 

Agency reserves the right to accept or deny use sites for food contact surface towelettes on a 

case-by-case basis.

(1) Test Procedure. The Agency recommends the use of the Interim Guidance for NonResidual Sanitization of Hard Inanimate Food Contact Surfaces Using Pre-Saturated Towelettes. 

This guidance may be found at: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/towelette.htm

Three samples, representing three different batches, one of which is at least 60 days old, 

should be evaluated for efficacy against E. coli (ATCC 11229) and S. aureus (ATCC 6538).

Based on the claims, a variety of surfaces may be treated with the product. Each of the different 

types of test surfaces claimed may be used in the efficacy testing of the product (i.e., glass, 

stainless steel, plastic, and ceramic). At a minimum, the applicant should test: 1) a stainless steel 

or glass surface, and 2) a plastic with a rough surface (i.e., plastic cutting boards). At a 

minimum, the surface should equal four square feet. Inoculate the test surface with the challenge 

microorganisms. After inoculation, the test surface should be dried for 40 minutes in an 
6

incubator at 30 - 37°C. A "zero-time" bacterial numbers recovery test should be performed to 

demonstrate the efficiency of the recovery process, and should be reported.

The towelette removed from its container should be handled with sterile gloves. The 

inoculated surfaces should be tested by wiping the surfaces with the saturated towelette. One 

towelette should be used to wipe the number of carriers that equal four square feet. The area of 

the towelette used for wiping should be rotated so as to expose a maximum amount of its surface 

in the course of wiping the contaminated test surface. 

(2) Evaluation of towelette sanitizing success. The product should demonstrate a 

≥99.999% mean reduction in the number of test microorganisms (bacteria) within 30 seconds. 

The result should be reported according to the actual count and percentage reduction over the 

control.

(i) Sanitizers for Toilet and Urinal Bowl Water. This section addresses efficacy testing 

for products with claims as sanitizers for toilet and urinal bowl water.

(1) Test Procedure. A simulated-use study should be designed which incorporates all of 

the elements listed in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) through (i)(1)(iv) in this guideline.

(i) The product should be added to samples of the bowl water from three toilets or 

urinals, one toilet/urinal per lot, at the use concentration employing the recommended method of 

dispensing. Untreated control samples from the three toilets or urinals should also be included.

(ii) Whether the product is automatically metered, or dispensed in some other fashion, 

into the bowl water (or urinal trap), the consistent accuracy of the concentration dispensed and 

maintained should be documented.

(iii) Inocula containing representative Gram-positive (e.g., Enterococcus faecium ATCC 

6569) or Gram-negative (e.g., Salmonella enterica ATCC 10708) test bacteria should be added 

to the treated and control samples of the bowl water from each of the toilets or urinals to provide 

a concentration of at least 104colony-forming units per milliliter.

(iv) Microbial counts of the treated bowl water and the control bowl water should be 

conducted at a minimum of three exposure intervals, equating to the duration of the product, ( 

“x” number of flushes/day/ “x” weeks), in addition to a 0-time control.

(2) Evaluation of Sanitizing Success. The reduction of each test microorganism should 

be at ≥99.9% mean reduction over the 0-time control and the parallel untreated inoculated 

control.

(j) In-Tank Sanitizers. This section addresses efficacy testing for products which bear 

label claims for use as an automatically dispensed in-tank sanitizer.

(1) Test Procedures. In-tank sanitizer products should be evaluated by a preliminary 
7

simulated-use test followed by a laboratory efficacy test. These tests should incorporate the 

elements in paragraphs (j)(1)(i) through (j)(1)(i)(B).

(i) Preliminary simulated-use test. The use-life of the in-tank product should be 

documented for three product samples, each in a separate toilet under the conditions in 

paragraphs (j)(1)(i)(A) and (j)(1)(i)(B) of this guideline simulating actual usage. Testing 

conducted with a 6 gallons/flush toilet may be used to generate data for low flush toilets (3.5 

gallons/flush).

(A) Number of flushes (dispensation of the dosage) per day per X weeks (duration of 

effectiveness) with a non-chlorinated water supply at 25-30 C (the warm water temperature 

extreme in summer).

(B) The bowl water should be analyzed at periodic intervals during the testing indicated 

in paragraph (j)(1)(i)(A) in this guideline to demonstrate the pH and concentration of the active 

ingredients.

(ii) Laboratory efficacy tests. Bacteriologic assays should be conducted on treated and 

untreated samples which are neutralized by standard procedures employing:

(A) Samples of the residual bowl water from three toilets (one lot per toilet) (at the minimal use concentration) and corresponding untreated control samples from three toilets at 10-.15 

C (the most stringent water temperature for demonstrating efficacy).

(B) Representative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Enterococcus

faecium ATCC 6569, and Salmonella enterica ATCC 10708) with an inoculum of at least 

104CFU/mL.

(C) A minimum of three exposure intervals, in addition to a 0-time control.

(iii) Evaluation of in-tank sanitizing success. The reduction of each test microorganism 

should be ≥99.9% mean reduction over the 0-time control and the parallel untreated inoculated 

control.

(k) Residual self-sanitizing activity of dried chemical residues on hard-inanimate 

surfaces - wet surfaces. This section addresses efficacy testing for products which bear label 

claims to provide residual self-sanitizing activity (e.g., significant reduction in numbers of 

infectious microorganisms which may be present or subsequently deposited) on treated surfaces 

that are likely to become and remain wet under normal conditions of use.

(1) Test procedure. Residual self-sanitizing products for use on hard, non-porous, 

inanimate surfaces should be evaluated for efficacy using a controlled in-use study or simulated 

in-use study. The design of the study should be done in consultation with the Agency and should 

include the basic elements set forth in paragraphs (k)(1)(i) through (k)(1)(vii) of this guideline.

(i) The test microorganisms employed in the study should be pathogens that are likely to 
8

be encountered in the environment in which the product is to be used.

(ii) The starting inocula of the test microorganisms for both initial and subsequent 

challenges should be of sufficient concentration to provide at least 104survivors on the parallel 

control surface.

(iii) Subsequent challenges should be of sufficient frequency to accurately represent 

normal conditions of use. 

(iv) Quantitative bacteriological sampling should be conducted at frequent and regular 

intervals for the length of time the residual activity can be expected to exist under the expected 

use conditions.

(v) The same types of surfaces without the treatment should be employed in the test and 

inoculated in a manner and over an exposure period identical to the use pattern for which the 

product is intended.

(vi) The environmental conditions (e.g., relative humidity and temperature) should be the 

same as those likely to be encountered under normal conditions of product use. Tests should also 

include those environmental conditions that would act to reduce the effective concentration of 

the product on the inanimate surface (e.g., rinsing, abrasion, organic load, repeated challenges by 

microorganisms, etc.).

(vii) The length of time the residual activity can be expected to exist under the expected 

use conditions should be documented.

(2) Evaluation of success of residual self-sanitizing action. For residual self-sanitizing 

claims, it should be demonstrated that a product is capable of reducing the number of test 

microorganisms on the test surface by 99.9% over that of the parallel control surfaces.

(l) Residual self-sanitizing activity of dried chemical residues on hard-inanimate

surfaces - dry surfaces. This section addresses efficacy testing for products which bear label 

claims to provide residual self-sanitizing activity (e.g., significant reduction in numbers of 

infectious microorganisms which may be present or subsequently deposited) on treated dry

surfaces.

(1) Test Procedure. The Agency recommends the use of the Protocol for Residual SelfSanitizing Activity of Dried Chemical Residues on Hard Non-Porous Surfaces. This guidance 

may be found at: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/regpolicy.htm.

(2) Evaluation of residual self-sanitizing success. The product should demonstrate that 

it is capable of reducing the number of test microorganisms on the test surface by ≥99.9% over 

that of the parallel control surfaces in≤5 minutes for a 24 hour period.

(m) Data collection and reporting—(1) General. To assist in the proper review and 

evaluation of product performance, complete descriptions of the test employed and the results 
9

obtained should be submitted to the Agency. All test reports should include, at the least, the 

following information:

(i) Study title;

(ii) Product Identity;

(iii) Guideline number/Data Requirement; 

(iv) Identification of the testing laboratory or organization;

(v) Location where the test was performed;

(vi) Name(s) of the person(s) responsible for the test;

(vii) Statement of Confidentiality Claims;

(viii) Statement of 40 CFR Part 160 Good Laboratory Practice compliance and Quality 

Assurance Statement;

(ix) Purpose of the study;

(x) Date and time of the start and end of the test;

(xi) Test employed and any modifications (e.g., organic soil, hard water, etc), when 

using standard tests (e.g., AOAC, ASTM, etc) all deviations to the test methods should be 

reported;

(xii) Test microorganisms employed, including identification of the specific strain 

(ATCC or other);

(xiii) Description of the test substance, including the percent of active ingredient;

(xiv) Concentration or dilution of the product tested and how prepared;

(xv) Number of samples, batches and replicates tested;

(xvi) Manufacture date of each product batch; 

(xvii) Identification of all material or procedural options employed, where such choice is 

provided for or recommended in the test method selected (e.g., growth media, drying time for 

inoculated carriers, neutralization confirmation and/or subculture media, secondary 

subculturing);

(xviii) Test exposure conditions (e.g., contact time, temperature, and relative humidity);
10

(xix) Complete reports of results obtained for each replication;

(xx) Any control data essential to establish the validity of the test.

(xxi) Carrier counts;

(xxii) Statistical treatment of the data;

(xxiii) Conclusions;

(xxiv) References;

(xxv) Appendices, including study protocol and all raw data reports associated with the 

conduct of the study;

The applicant is encouraged to use the EPA’s standard efficacy report format, which may 

be found at http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/efficacystudystandards.htm

(2) Data for modifications of recommended methods. Where recommended methods 

are modified to support specific claims and/or use patterns for a product, the protocol, identifying 

and describing each modification, should be provided in specific detail with the test report. The 

applicant is encouraged to submit the proposed modification to the Agency for review and 

evaluation prior to initiation of the test.

(3) Data for other methods. When recommended methods, or modifications thereto, are 

not employed to develop efficacy data (such as actual in-use or many kinds of simulated-use 

testing), complete testing protocols should be submitted with the test reports. All materials and 

procedures employed in testing should be described in a manner consistent with original research 

reports published in technical or scientific journals. Where references to published reports or 

papers are made, copies or reprints of such references should be provided with the test reports. 

The applicant should to submit the proposed testing protocols for in-use or simulated-use studies 

to the Agency for review and evaluation prior to initiation of the test.

(n) References: The following references may be consulted for additional background 

information:

(1) Annual Book of Standards, Test Method for Efficacy of Sanitizers Recommended for 

Inanimate Non-Food Contact Surfaces, Designation E1153. American Society for Testing and 

Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428.

(2) Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, Chapter 6, Disinfectants,

Official Method 955.16 Chlorine (Available) in Disinfectants, Germicidal Equivalent Concentration. Current edition. AOAC International, Suite 500, 481 North Frederick Avenue, 

Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.
11

(3) Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International, Official Method 960.09 

Germicidal and Detergent Sanitizing Action of Disinfectants. Current edition. AOAC 

International, Suite 500, 481 North Frederick Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2417.