alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000  (UNAUDITED)  AND THE  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT  OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000  (UNAUDITED)  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>               1,000

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         40,447
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 198,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   50,879
<INVENTORY>                                                    20,633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              255,129
<PP&E>                                                        537,527
<DEPRECIATION>                                                373,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                630,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         151,120
<BONDS>                                                       375,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                           52
<OTHER-SE>                                                    103,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  103,735
<SALES>                                                       503,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              503,292
<CGS>                                                         140,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 140,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               19,018
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             20,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                46,296
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   19,444
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            26,852
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   26,852
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.50


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-51103

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDUARDO OROZCO-GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-1271-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Eduardo Orozco-Gomez has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Orozco-Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-51103 Document: 00511640653 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 10-51103

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-51103 Document: 00511640653 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
LAW OFFICES OF

RAYMOND P. FITZPATRICK, JR.

1200 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 105

BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35242

TELEPHONE (205) 437-8846

October 14, 2015

Electronically and by Overnight Delivery

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment To Exemption No. 11545 Issued To

Clean Energy Renewables, LLC Pursuant To Section 333 of

The FAA Reform Act, Docket No. FAA-2015-0399

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On May 11, 2015, FAA granted the referenced Section 333 exemption to conduct aerial 

data collection to Clean Energy Renewables, LLC ("CER"). CER respectfully requests an 

amendment to authorize the use of additional UAS systems.

CER seeks approval to utilize the following UAS platforms manufactured by Sky Eye 

Innovations:

Sky Eye T-Series UAV

Sky Eye A-Series UAV

Sky Eye OGI UAV

Sky Eye Micro UAV

These UAS platforms have not been previously reviewed by FAA. Technical specifications for 

each of the listed Sky Eye products are included in the confidential operating manual that is 

being filed with FAA by overnight delivery under separate cover. Also confidentially submitted

is additional technical information and safety procedures in the format of FAA Order 8130.34C 

Appendix D. To the extent not addressed in these documents, all operations will be conducted in 

accord with CER's current exemption and standard Section 333 operating procedures and 

conditions.
October 14, 2014

Page 2

The gross weight of each of these units is under 10 lbs., with a maximum gross weight, 

including payload, of under 20 lbs. CER requests that the Secretary find, in consideration of the 

size, weight, speed and limited operating area associated with these aircraft and their operation,

that the aircraft meet the conditions of Section 333 and relief from 14 CFR part 21, to the extent 

needed, is appropriate.

CER requests authority to utilize the Sky Eye UAS platforms listed above in the same 

manner for aerial data collection and subject to all other conditions as set forth in CER's 

Exemption No. 11545.

CER believes the requested amendment will not set any precedent or raise any new 

issues. We request that FAA dispense with publication of the summary of this petition in the 

Federal Register and grant the requested amendment on a summary basis.

An amendment to Exemption No. 11545 to authorize use of each of the Sky Eye UAS 

systems listed above is respectfully requested.

Yours very truly,

/s/ Raymond P. Fitzpatrick, Jr.

Raymond P. Fitzpatrick, Jr.

Attorney for Clean Energy Renewables, LLC

RPFjr/deb
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 8 


1595 Wynkoop Street 


DENVER, CO 80202-1129 


Phone 800-227-8917 


http://www.epa.gov/region08 

AUG - 1 2012 

Ref: 8P-AR 

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED & ELECTRONIC MAIL 

James Catlin 

Chief Operating Officer 

Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. 

1625 Broadway, Suite 250 

Denver, CO 80202 

RE: Actual Notice for Approval and Promulgation of 

Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas 

Production Facilities 

Dear Mr. Catlin, 

This is to notify you that the EPA has issued a temporary interim final rule promulgating a reservationspecific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) in order to regulate emissions from oil and natural gas 

production facilities located on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (FBIR). The FIP includes basic air 

quality regulations for the protection ofcommunities in and adjacent to the FBIR. The FIP requires 

owners and operators ofoil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions of volatile organic 

compounds emanating from well completions, recompletions, and production and storage operations. 

The agency proposed a reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule. 

The rule is effective with this actual notice to Kodiak Oil and Gas Corporation for purposes of 

enforcement beginning at 5 p.m. (eastern daylight time) on August 3,2012. We will accept comments 

on the proposed rule for 45 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register. The EPA 

Administrator, Lisa Jackson, signed the interim final rule on August 1, 2012, and the agency is 

submitting it for publication in the Federal Register (FR). 
A copy ofthe signed interim final rule is enclosed with this letter. The version ofthe enclosed rule 

serves as the official version for purposes of compliance until the interim final rule is published in the 

FR. Please refer to the published version in a forthcoming FR publication, which will appear on the 

Government Printing Office's FDsys website (http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/searchlhome.action) and on 

Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov) in Docket No. EPA-R08-0AR-2012-0479. 

If you have any questions on the interim final rule, please contact Deirdre Rothery at (303) 312-6431. 

Carl Daly, Director 

Air Program 

Enclosures 

2
Gerry Brannon WALKER v. STATE

CR-16-0062

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.3

Report of Independent Public Accountants

To the Stockholders and
Board of Directors of Joule Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Joule, Inc. (a
Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and 2000 and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2001.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Joule, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of September 30, 2001 and 2000 and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2001 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
November 9, 2001

The report is a copy of a previous issued report. Arthur Andersen LLP has not
reissued the report.
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 105 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 

Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 

Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered 

Status for the Southern Distinct Population Segment’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 21, 2022 

Mr. MANN (for himself, Mr. ESTES, Mr. LATURNER, Mr. MULLIN, Mrs. BICE

of Oklahoma, and Mr. LUCAS) submitted the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to 

‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser 

Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 

Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and 

Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Population 

Segment’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the DiVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:12 Dec 22, 2022 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ105.IH HJ105

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 105 IH 

1 rector of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relat2 ing to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 

3 Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 

4 4(d) Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment 

5 and Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Popu6 lation Segment’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 72674 (November 25, 

7 2022)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Derrick GRANTLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2995

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 12, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This proceeding is dismissed as an appeal from a nonfinal, nonappealable order. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant's right to file a timely notice of appeal once the circuit court enters a final appealable order disposing of all of the appellant's claims raised in the motion for postconviction relief still under consideration by the circuit court.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT I, Phillip J. Smith, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 11, 2004/s/ Phillip J. Smith

Phillip J. Smith
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



|(1) | The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: September 28, 2005



/s/ Fred B. ParksFred B. ParksChairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Todd E. PaulsonTodd E. PaulsonVice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 D0 06 0 . LESTER SMI TH v . THE STATE.

Les t er Sm i th was fo un d g u i l t y o f m al i ce m u rd er an d o t h e r c r i m es an d was

s en t en ced t o l i fe i m

p ri s o n m en t o n t h e m

u rd er ch arg e. Th e Su p rem e Co u rt affi rm ed

h i s co n v i ct i o n s o n ap peal

. S mi t h v. S t at e , 2 9 0 Ga. 7 68 (7 2 3 SE2 d 91 5 ) (2 0 1 2 ). Sm i th

l at er fi l ed a m o ti o n t o m o d i fy h i s s en t en ce, wh i ch t h e t ri al co u rt den i ed

. H e n o w

s eek s d i s cret i o nary rev i ew o f t h at ru l i n g i n t h i s Co u rt

. Un d er o u r Co ns t it u t i o n , t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ap p el l at e ju ri s d i c t i o n o v er

“ [a] l l cas es i n w h i ch a s en t en ce o f deat h was i m p o s ed o r co ul d b e i m

p o s ed .” See Ga.

Co n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8 ). Becau s e a p en al t y of d eat h can b e

i m p o s ed fo r t h e cri m e o f m urd er, ju ri s d ict i o n i s pro p er i n t h e S u p r e m e Co u rt

. See

OCGA § 1 7 -1 0 -3 0 (b ); Nea l v. S t a t e , 29 0 G a. 5 6 3

, 5 7 2 (7 22 SE2 d 7 6 5 ) (2 0 1 2 )

(Hu ns t ei n , C. J., co n cu rri n g); s ee al s o S ta t e v. Th o rn t o n , 2 53 Ga. 5 2 4 (3 2 2 SE2 d 7 1 1 )

(1 9 8 4) (d i rect i n g t h i s Co u rt to t ran s fer “ al l cas es i n w h i ch ei t h er a s en t en ce o f d eat h

o r o f l i fe i m

p ri s o n m en t h as b een i m

p o s ed u p o n co n vi ct i o n o f m u rd er”). Acco rd i n g l y ,

t h i s ap p l i cat i o n i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co urt fo r d i s po s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. August 29, 2017

08/29/2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          34,364
<SECURITIES>                                     5,022
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,434
<INVENTORY>                                     13,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,159
<PP&E>                                          45,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,048
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,995
<SALES>                                         86,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,064
<CGS>                                           30,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,288
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   795
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,498
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,498
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
EX PARTE William R. BURNETTE

CR-16-0341

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.