alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 JER INVESTORS TRUST INC. 
 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO.1 to the JER Investors Trust Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) is made effective as of December 16, 2008. Capitalized terms used but not defined
herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan. 
 WHEREAS, JER Investors Trust Inc. (the “Company”) adopted
that Plan on May 30, 2007; 
 WHEREAS, the Company has determined that the Plan should be amended to ensure that it and awards granted
thereunder are exempt from, or comply with, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan
is amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 1.2(f) of the Plan is amended by inserting the following as flush language following the cause (iv) thereof: 

 Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, a Change in Control shall not be deemed to have occurred unless
such transaction also constitutes a change in the ownership of a corporation or a change in the effective control of a corporation or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of a corporation’s assets, each within the meaning of
Section 409A. 
  

	 	2.	The plan is amended by inserting the following as a new Section 1.2(x) and renumbering the remaining subsections of Section 1.2 accordingly, and any references in the Plan
or any Award Agreement to such subsections shall also be renumbered accordingly: 

 (x) “Section 409A”
means Section 409A of the Code. 
  

	 	3.	The Plan is amended by inserting the following as a new Section 10.6: 

 10.6 Section 409A. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, to the extent that any Award would be subject to
Section 409A, no such Award may be granted if it would fail to comply with the requirements set forth in Section 409A. To the extent that the Committee determines that the Plan or any Award is subject to Section 409A and fails to
comply with the requirements of Section 409A, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Plan or in any Award Agreement, the Committee reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan and/or amend, restructure, terminate or
replace the Award, without the consent of the Participant, to cause the Award to either not be subject to Section 409A or to comply with applicable provisions of such section. In addition, for each Award subject to Section 409A, a
termination of employment or service with the Company shall be deemed to have occurred under the Plan with respect to such Award on the first day on which the Participant has experienced a “separation from service” within the meaning of
Section 409A. 
 Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 (signature page follows) 







 IN WITHNESS WHEREOF, the authorized representative of the Company has executed this Amendment No. 1
to the Plan, effective as of the Effective Date. 
  

					
	JER INVESTORS TRUST INC.
		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Mark S. Weiss
		 	 Name: 
	 	 Mark S. Weiss

		 	 Title:
	 	 President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                          65,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    111,233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               209,089
<PP&E>                                         242,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 377,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          124,620
<BONDS>                                        268,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,033)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   377,167
<SALES>                                        883,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               883,224
<CGS>                                          676,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  676,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               182,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,015
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   120.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   120.46
        

</TABLE>
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1002 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to authorize the 

debarment of certain registrants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1002 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debarment Enforce3 ment of Bad Actor Registrants Act of 2021’’ or the 

4 ‘‘DEBAR Act of 2021’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEBARMENT OF CERTAIN REGISTRANTS. 

6 Section 304 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

7 U.S.C. 824) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(h) The Attorney General may issue an order to pro10 hibit, conditionally or unconditionally, and permanently or 

11 for such period as the Attorney General may determine, 

12 any person from being registered under this title to manu13 facture, distribute, or dispense a controlled substance or 

14 a list I chemical, if the Attorney General finds that— 

15 ‘‘(1) such person meets or has met any of the 

16 conditions for suspension or revocation of registra17 tion under subsection (a); and 

18 ‘‘(2) such person has a history of prior suspen19 sions or revocations of registration.’’. 

20 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

21 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

22 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

23 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

24 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

25 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

26 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, proVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:30 Apr 19, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1002.RFS H1002

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1002 RFS

1 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

2 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 15, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



|(1) | The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: February 8, 2008 |  |  |  |                                     
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ Fred B. Parks                   
|                       |  |  |  | Fred B. Parks                       
|                       |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ Elissa J. Lindsoe               
|                       |  |  |  | Elissa J. Lindsoe                   
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer             
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ Fred B. Parks                   
|                       |  |  |  | Fred B. Parks                       
|                       |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | /s/ Elissa J. Lindsoe               
|                       |  |  |  | Elissa J. Lindsoe                   
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
     on Form S-8 (No. 33-61907)  pertaining to the 1981 Employee Incentive Stock
     Option  Plan,  1987  Stock  Option  Plan,  1995  Stock  Option  Plan,  1995
     Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, and 1995 Employee Stock Purchase
     Plan  and in  the  Registration  Statement  on  Form  S-8  (No.  333-10257)
     pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and 1995 Non-Employee
     Directors' Stock Option Plan, as amended, and in the Registration Statement
     on Form S-8 (No.  333-44959)  pertaining  to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, as
     amended, and 1995 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, as amended and
     the 1995 Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan, as amended,  of California  Micro
     Devices Corporation of our report dated April 29, 1998, with respect to the
     financial  statements and schedule of California Micro Devices  Corporation
     included  in this  Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31,
     1998.

                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


        San Jose, California
        June 17, 1998

                                       39
EX-10.36







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.36




TOYS “R” US, INC.

RESTRICTED STOCK




Date: ____________




Grant to:




 








_________ shares of the common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Toys “R” Us, Inc. (the
“Company”) at a purchase price of _________ per share in cash; and



          The foregoing stock is “Restricted Stock” as such term is defined in the Company’s Amended and
Restated Toys “R” Us, Inc. Management Equity Plan (as amended, the “Plan”), and is subject
to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan in effect from time to time. The foregoing stock
shall be issued to the Participant upon payment to the Company of the aggregate purchase price of
$____________.



          Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the undersigned resigns with Good Reason (as
defined in that certain employment agreement, entered into on ____________, between the undersigned
and Toys “R” Us, Inc.), then such resignation shall be treated, for purposes of Article IX of the
plan, as if the undersigned has been terminated without Cause on the date of the undersigned’s
resignation.



          [Not withstanding the foregoing or Section 10.6 of the Plan, the put rights set forth in
Article X of the Plan shall be applicable to this Award in accordance with the terms thereof.]



          This agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts (including by means of telecopied
signature pages), all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its duly authorized officers, has
caused this agreement to be executed as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	TOYS “R” US, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	Accepted and Agreed:

 	 	 
	
 	 	 
	Name
#### DAVIS et al. v. LEWIS FISH CO. et al.

No. 3598-A.

First Division. Juneau.

May 21, 1934.

*526H. L. Faulkner, of Juneau, for plaintiffs.

Wm. L. Paul, of Juneau, for defendants.

ALEXANDER, District Judge.

On defendants’ motion to dismiss, the court finds:

That neither the allegations of the complaint nor the proofs submitted are sufficient to support the relief demanded.

There is no allegation that plaintiff is lawfully in possession of the trap site or that the plaintiff is entitled to the exclusive possession thereof, or facts from, which that can be inferred.

Neither are there any allegations or proof that the defendants wrongfully or unlawfully or without right placed an obstruction on the trap site in question. In other words, both the allegations and proof fail to show any right in plaintiffs to the exclusive possession of the trap site in question or that defendants have acted wrongfully or unlawfully in placing an obstruction there.

Furthermore, there are no allegations or proof to the effect that the fish trap location (and that is the thing in dispute) is of any value, or why it is valuable, if such be the facts, and therefore there is no basis for the allegations that plaintiff has or will suffer great and irreparable injury and damage. Other objections were pointed out which might lead to similar conclusions, but it is unnecessary to consider them.

From the foregoing it follows that the motion to dismiss is well taken and should be allowed, and it is so ordered, but without prejudice.
Brianna ARMOUR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Alicia ETHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-328

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 12, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 101 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 101

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 regarding the permissible sources of funding for elections for public 
                   office and State ballot measures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2022

   Mr. McNerney submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 regarding the permissible sources of funding for elections for public 
                   office and State ballot measures.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The only source of funding to directly or indirectly 
support or oppose a campaign for election to public office shall be 
either contributions by individual citizens to the principal campaign 
committee controlled by the candidate or funds provided under a system 
of public election financing or voter education established by 
Congress, the State, or other jurisdiction as appropriate.
    ``Section 2. The only source of funding that may be used to 
directly or indirectly support or oppose a ballot measure to amend a 
State constitution or other initiatives or referenda shall be either 
contributions made by individuals who are eligible to vote on the 
measure or funds provided under a system of public election financing 
or voter education established by the State.
    ``Section 3. Congress, the States, and local jurisdictions shall 
establish limits on the amount of contributions individuals may make 
with respect to a single campaign for election to Federal, State, or 
local office, respectively, including limits on the amount of 
contributions an individual who is a candidate for such office may make 
with respect to the individual's own campaign, and the States and local 
jurisdictions shall establish limits on the amount of contributions 
individuals may make with respect to a ballot measure.
    ``Section 4. Congress and the States shall have the power to carry 
out this article through appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 5. Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant 
Congress or the States the power to abridge the freedom of the 
press.''.
                                 <all>
```
Trevond WATTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3831

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1117 

To amend the Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park Establishment Act of 2000 to provide for additional areas 

to be added to the park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2021 

Mr. DESAULNIER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front 

National Historical Park Establishment Act of 2000 to 

provide for additional areas to be added to the park, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROSIE THE RIVETER/WORLD WAR II HOME 

4 FRONT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ADDI5 TIONS. 

6 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

7 ‘‘Rosie the Riveter National Historic Site Expansion Act’’. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1117 IH

1 (b) ADDITIONS.—The Rosie the Riveter/World War 

2 II Home Front National Historical Park Establishment 

3 Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 410ggg et seq.) is amended as 

4 follows: 

5 (1) In section 2(b), by adding at the end the 

6 following: ‘‘Not later than 180 days after areas are 

7 added to the park administratively or by Federal 

8 law, the Secretary shall update the map to include 

9 the added areas.’’. 

10 (2) By adding at the end of section 2, the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(c) ADDITIONAL AREAS INCLUDED.—In addition to 

13 areas included under subsection (b), the park shall include 

14 the following: 

15 ‘‘(1) The Nystrom Elementary School–The 

16 Maritime Building, as listed on the National Reg17 ister of Historic Places. 

18 ‘‘(2) Such other areas as the Secretary deems 

19 appropriate.’’. 

20 (3) By amending section 3(e)(2) to read as fol21 lows: 

22 ‘‘(2) OTHER PROPERTY.—Within the bound23 aries of the park, the Secretary may acquire lands, 

24 improvements, waters, or interests therein, by dona25 tion, purchase, exchange or transfer. Any lands, or 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1117 IH

1 interests therein, owned by the State of California or 

2 any political subdivision thereof, may be acquired 

3 only by donation. When any tract of land is only 

4 partly within such boundaries, the Secretary may ac5 quire all or any portion of the land outside of such 

6 boundaries in order to minimize the payment of sev7 erance costs. Land so acquired outside of the bound8 aries may be exchanged by the Secretary for non9 Federal lands within the boundaries. Any portion of 

10 land acquired outside the boundaries and not used 

11 for exchange shall be reported to the General Serv12 ices Administration for disposal for not less than 

13 fair market value under chapter 1 of title 40, United 

14 States Code.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com July 2 9

, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for XFLY, LLC Exemption Request Under Section 333 of

the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of

2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, XFLY, LLC

. , an operator of Small Unmanned

Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service photography, videography,

and Motion Picture filming

, seeks exemption f rom the following listed Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR) to allow commercial operatio n of the XFold Cinema within the National

Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, Motion Picture and television filming,

including closed set filming, flight demonstration and trai ning over certain areas of the

United States, conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein, or as may be

established by the FAA, as required by Section 333 requirements.

XFLY, LLC

, in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements of 14

C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.

XFLY, LLC has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition

because it would not set a ny precedent and because the relief requested is identical to

numerous exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87

.

In addition, XFLY, LLC will be utilizing the s ame XFold Cinema pr oven technologies the

FAA has already accepted and approved for Exemption No

. 11532. All of the appropriate

documentation to accompany XFLY, LLC Sec tion 333 Petition is included. Combined,

th eir comp rehensive Section 333 Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given

to their chosen products and th e technology, should provide the support necessary to the

FAA for a S ummary G rant of XFLY ’ s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process.UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Jo e Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
J.D. BENNETT v. Judge Jenifer HOLT and Jackson County Circuit Court

2160199

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.