alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rufus EDMONDSON, d/b/a RUFUS EDMONDSON MOTORS *v.*Daniel A. HARRIS, by his father, Wayne HARRIS

74-24

510 S.W. 2d 290

Opinion delivered June 17, 1974

*764
      *Laser, Sharp, Haley, Young & Boswell, P.A.,*for appellant.

*Joe Purcell,*for appellee.

J. FRED Jones, Justice.

Rufus Edmondson owned a Honda motorcycle agency in Benton, Arkansas, and was in the business of selling and repairing motorcycles. Wayne Harris had purchased a Honda motorcycle from Edmondson and returned it to Edmondson for repairs. The motorcycle was stolen from Edmondson’s locked building during a burglary over the weekend. Harris sued Edmondson for the value of the motorcycle, the case was tried by the circuit judge sitting as a jury and judgment was rendered for Harris in the amount of SI,580.

On appeal to this court Edmondson contends that there was no substantial evidence to support the judgment of the trial court, but we are of the opinion there"was.

The facts appear to be as follows: On March 30, 1973, Harris delivered a 1972 Honda motorcycle to Edmondson’s place of business for repairs. Edmondson kept the motorcycle-over the weekend and locked it inside his building along with other new and used vehicles. Edmondson left the ignition key in the switch on the motorcycle and during the weekend his place was burglarized and the motorcycle, which weighed about 700 pounds, was stolen. The evidence indicated that a window was broken to gain entry to the building; that a door was then unlocked from the inside and the motorcycle rolled from the building.

It is quite true, as pointed out by the appellant, that some state courts have held the mere leaving of an ignition key in a vehicle inside a locked garage is not such evidence of negligence as should be considered by a jury, but in the case at bar the one motorcycle key was designed for and served two purposes. One was for the regular ignition switch and the other was to lock the front wheel of the vehicle in a turned position where it could only be pushed or ridden in a circle.

*765Mr. Edmondson testified that the front fork on the motorcycle had been extended and unless the lock had been reinstated it could not have been locked. He said he did not examine the motorcycle and does not know whether the motorcycle could be locked.

Mr. Harris testified that when the key was removed from the Honda, it remained in a locked position with the front wheel at an angle. He said that had the key been removed from the switch, it would have been impossible to roll or ride the Honda from the premises, and that it would have taken six or seven men to remove it from the premises.

We are of the opinion that when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court’s finding, there was substantial evidence to sustain the judgment of the trial court, and that the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Matthew Natalizio, Chief Financial Officer of CytRx Corporation, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CytRx Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 31, 2007                                                                            /s/ MATTHEW NATALIZIO   Matthew Natalizio   Chief Financial Officer
Bryant James ANDERSON v. STATE

CR-15-1058

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 8 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 8

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
            provide for balanced budgets for the Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Gallagher) submitted the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
            provide for balanced budgets for the Government.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed 
total receipts for that fiscal year, unless two-thirds of the whole 
number of each House of Congress shall provide by law for a specific 
excess of outlays over receipts by a rollcall vote.
    ``Section 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President shall 
transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the United States 
Government for that fiscal year in which total outlays do not exceed 
total receipts.
    ``Section 3. The Congress may waive the provisions of this article 
for any fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in effect by a 
rollcall vote.
    ``Section 4. The Congress may waive the provisions of this article 
for any fiscal year in which a declaration of national emergency is in 
effect, as so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of 
the whole number of each House, which becomes law.
    ``Section 5. The Congress may waive the provisions of this article 
for any fiscal year in which a declaration of a natural disaster is in 
effect, as so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of 
the whole number of each House, which becomes law.
    ``Section 6. The Congress shall enforce and implement this article 
by appropriate legislation, which may rely on estimates of outlays and 
receipts.
    ``Section 7. This article shall take effect beginning with the 
fifth fiscal year beginning after its ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Immtech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric L. Sorkin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|   | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

/s/ Eric L. Sorkin

Eric L. Sorkin

President & Chief Executive Officer 

August 11, 2006

 

 
|  |
|--|

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1118 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1118

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the exclusion 
 of Medicare coverage for hearing aids and examinations therefor, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

   Mrs. Dingell (for herself, Mr. Kilmer, Miss Rice of New York, Ms. 
Schakowsky, Ms. McCollum, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Matsui, Mr. Doggett, and Mr. 
 Fitzpatrick) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the exclusion 
 of Medicare coverage for hearing aids and examinations therefor, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Hearing Aid Coverage Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. REMOVING MEDICARE EXCLUSION OF COVERAGE OF HEARING AIDS AND 
              EXAMINATIONS THEREFOR.

    (a) In General.--Section 1862(a)(7) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395y(a)(7)) is amended by striking ``hearing aids or 
examinations therefor,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2022.

SEC. 3. GAO STUDY AND REPORT ON HEARING AID PROGRAMS.

    (a) Study.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
conduct a study of programs, including Federal programs and health 
insurance coverage, that provide assistance for hearing aids and 
related examinations for individuals with hearing loss. Such study 
shall include an examination of the number of individuals in the United 
States with hearing loss who need hearing aids, their coverage under 
such programs, and the effectiveness of such programs in meeting such 
need. Such study may also address programs that are designed to reduce 
or mitigate the incidence of hearing loss.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date specified in 
section 2(b), the Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress 
on the study conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall include 
such recommendations on changes in such programs, including the 
establishment of new programs, as would meet the needs of individuals 
with hearing loss.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,322
<INVENTORY>                                        783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   589
<PP&E>                                          19,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        15,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,762
<SALES>                                         97,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,162
<CGS>                                           80,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,562)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,187)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,845)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          383
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,227)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.00)



</TABLE>
# 31st Shipbuilding Quadrilateral Meeting to Foster Collaboration and Innovation Among Allied Navies

### 10 Apr 2024

"QUADLAT provides a valuable platform for open dialogue and partnership building among our allied navies," said Ms. Bilyana Anderson, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Ships. "This year, we aim to leverage this opportunity to share experiences, highlight advancements in strengthening the shipbuilding and repair industrial base, and exchange lessons learned to enhance our collective capabilities."

The meeting will coincide with the 2024 Sea Air Space Exposition, taking place from April 8th to 10th, 2024. QUADLAT participants are encouraged to attend this leading maritime exposition, which showcases the latest advancements in maritime, defense, and energy technology.

“The Coast Guard is regularly operating around the globe with our partner nations. QUADLAT provides an excellent opportunity to share our collective shipbuilding experiences to maximize learning across all of our programs and create more global maritime capability.” said RADM Chad Jacoby, USCG Director of Acquisition Programs.

The Shipbuilding Quadrilateral meeting underscores the commitment of allied nations to collaborative innovation and knowledge sharing. By enhancing strategic partnerships, these nations aim to maintain maritime superiority and ensure the readiness of their naval forces to address evolving challenges. The event supports Secretary Del Toro’s call for a Maritime Statecraft encompassing a national, whole-of-government effort to build comprehensive U.S. and allied maritime power, both commercial and naval.
Lazaro YANEZ-AGUILERA, Appellant, v. PARADISE POINTE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D17-1331

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

June 3, 2010

Mr. George S. Aburn, Jr., Director

Maryland Department of the Environment

Air and Radiation Management Administration

1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, MD 21230

Dear Mr. Aburn:

On April 23, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department of the 

Environment. The SIP revision pertains to the adoption of the EPA Control Technique 

Guideline (CTG) for paper, film, and foil coatings. This SIP revision includes amendments to 

Regulation .07 under COMAR 26.11.19, Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes. 

EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is 

reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ellen 

Wentworth at (215) 814-2034. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely,

 /s/

 David Arnold, Acting Director 

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Brian Hug, MDE
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications**
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Ocular Sciences, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
Dated: August 6, 2004                                             /s/Stephen J. Fanning   Stephen J. Fanning   Chief Executive Officer   
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Ocular Sciences, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
Dated: August 6, 2004                                             /s/Steven M. Neil   Steven M. Neil   Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-495-000.
    Applicants: NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: NXUS OFO January 2022 Penalty 
Disbursement Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 1/25/22.
    Accession Number: 20220125-5084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/7/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 25, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01895 Filed 1-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1244 

To repeal certain foreign affairs reporting requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2021 

Mrs. KIM of California (for herself and Mr. CONNOLLY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal certain foreign affairs reporting requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN FOREIGN AFFAIRS RE4 PORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The following provisions of law 

6 are hereby repealed: 

7 (1) Subsection (b) of section 804 of Public Law 

8 101–246. 

9 (2) Section 6 of Public Law 104–45. 

10 (3) Section 406 of Public Law 101–246 (22 

11 U.S.C. 2414a). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1244 IH

1 (4) Subsection (c) of section 702 of Public Law 

2 96–465 (22 U.S.C. 4022). 

3 (5) Section 404 of the Arms Control and Disar4 mament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593b). 

5 (6) Section 5 of Public Law 94–304 (22 U.S.C. 

6 3005). 

7 (7) Subsection (b) of section 502 of the Inter8 national Security and Development Cooperation Act 

9 of 1985 (22 U.S.C. 2349aa–7). 

10 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

11 Subsection (c) of section 502 of the International Security 

12 and Development Cooperation Act of 1985 (22 U.S.C. 

13 2349aa–7) is redesignated as subsection (b). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Joseph H. BUNTS, Jr., Appellant, v. Shandora BUNTS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-703

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Alfred P. MONTGOMERY v. ALABAMA STATE BAR and John Brunson

2160261

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
17);
Donald BISHOP v. STATE

CR-16-0069

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017 Reh. denied February 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Efrain PADILLA-HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1477

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.