alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 6, 2021

No. 04-19-00575-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF CARLOS AGUILAR, DECEASED

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PB4-000048-L2

Honorable Victor Villarreal, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On March 26, 2021, the parties filed a “Joint Motion Pursuant to Settlement” in which 

they assert they settled the dispute that is the subject of this appeal and they filed an Agreed 

Order with the probate court. The parties asked this court to abate the appeal, remand the cause 

to the trial court to effectuate the agreement, and order each party to bear their own costs of 

appeal. On March 29, 2021, this court granted the motion in part, remanded the cause to the trial 

court to allow the court to effectuate the parties’ agreement as reflected in their executed 

Agreed Order, and abated this appeal pending further order of this court. Our order also directed 

the parties to file, no later than April 28, 2021, (1) a motion to dismiss this appeal in compliance 

with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 or (2) a letter informing this court of the status of 

the case before the trial court. 

On May 4, 2021, the parties filed an advisory requesting an additional thirty days. The 

request is GRANTED and the parties are ordered to file, no later than June 4, 2021, (1) a 

motion to dismiss this appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 or (2) 

a letter informing this court of the status of the case before the trial court. 

It is so ORDERED May 6, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0181

_________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: ALIA DAY FLOREN,

Petitioner and Appellee, v. JAVIER BAUTISTA- SCHEUBER,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Appellant Javier Bautista- Scheuber has filed a Motion Requesting Permission to Surpass the Reply Brief 5000 - Words Limit. On January 20, 2022, the Court granted Appellant’s motion to electronically file his reply brief and ordered that it comply with the applicable Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. On January 27, 2022, the Court rejected Appellant’s reply brief because it exceeded the 5000 - word limit. Th e Court has twice ordered Appellant to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure . We will not entertain any further motions regarding the filing of the reply brief. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s motion to exceed the 5000 - word limit is DENIED. Appellant’s reply brief is due no later than February 14, 2022. If the brief does not comply with the 5000 - word limit the case will be submitted to the Court on the briefs filed to date.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 3 2022

02/03/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0181
Summary Sheet: Terms of Employment for Named Executive Officers for 2009



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 Summary Sheet: Terms of Employment for Named Executive Officers for 2009 
 Employment Status 
 Pursuant to the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, the employees of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (the “Bank”), including the Bank’s chief executive
officer, the chief operating officer, the chief financial officer and other current named executive officers as of December 31, 2008 (Dean Schultz, Lisa B. MacMillen, Steven T. Honda, Lawrence H. Parks, Stephen P. Traynor and David H.
Martens) (the “named executive officers”), are “at will” employees. The named executive officers may resign at any time and the Bank may terminate their employment at any time for any reason or no reason, with or without cause
and with or without notice. 
 Each of the named executive officers receives a base salary and is eligible to participate in the Bank’s executive
incentive compensation plans and comprehensive benefit programs, including both qualified and nonqualified retirement benefit plans. Base salaries for 2009 for the named executive officers are: Dean Schultz: $725,000; Lisa B. MacMillen: $466,500;
Steven T. Honda: $330,000, Lawrence H. Parks: $380,200; Stephen P. Traynor: $330,000; and David H. Martens, $330,000. 
 Senior officers, including the named
executive officers, are also eligible to receive reimbursement for financial planning, health club membership, and parking expenses incurred each year up to a maximum amount of $12,000 annually per officer. On occasion, the Bank pays for resort
activities for employees, including our named executive officers, in connection with Board meetings and other business-related meetings; and in some cases, the Bank pays the expenses for spouses accompanying employees to these meetings or other
Bank-sponsored events. The President receives use of a Bank-owned vehicle. 
 A Bank employee, including the named executive officers, may receive severance
benefits in the event that the employee’s employment is terminated because the employee’s job or position is eliminated or because the job or position is substantially modified so that the employee is no longer qualified or cannot perform
the revised job. For the named executive officers, severance under the Bank’s current policy would be equal to the greater of (i) 12 weeks of the officer’s base salary, or (ii) the sum of three weeks of the officer’s base
salary plus three weeks of the officer’s base salary for each full year of service at the Bank to a maximum of 52 weeks. The Bank’s current severance policy also provides one month of continued health and life insurance benefits and, at
the Bank’s discretion, outplacement assistance.
February 5 , 2016

U.S. D e p a rtme n t of T r a n sport a tion Do c ke t Manag e ment S ystem 1200 N ew J e rs e y Av e ., S E W a shin gton, DC 20590

**R e**  **: P**  **e tition of**  **Grand Valley State Univ** **e rsi**  **t y**  **– Annis Water Resources Institute**  **for Summ**  **a r** **y G**  **r a**  **nt of E**  **x e**  **mption Pu r** **suant to S ec** **tion 333 of the**  **F A** **A Mod**  **e rniz**  **a tion**  **a nd Re** **f o**  **r m**  **A c** **t of 20 1**  **2** To Whom It M a y Con c e r n: Pu rsuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Mod e rn iz a tion a nd R e fo r m Act of 2012 ( R efo r m Act ) a nd 14 C. F .R. P a rt 11, Grand Valley State University – Annis Water Resources Institute ( GVSU
-AWRI ) h e r e b y a ppli e s for a Summ a ry G ra nt of E x e mption f rom the F e d e r a l Avi a t ion R e g u l a tions ( FAR s ) identifi e d b e low, to op e r a te small unmann e d a e ri a l ve hicl e s ( i.e., small unmann e d a ir c ra ft s ystems or U AS ) for the purp o se o f c ondu cting a e ri a l d a ta c o ll ection, including ae ri a l im a g i n g, r e mote s e n s ing, surv e y i n g, and air/water quality analysis in support of its e du c a tion a nd r e s ea r c h op e r a tion s . GVSU
-AWRI r e s p ectful l y submits that this P e tition for E xe mption qu a lifi e s for ex p e dit e d a ppro va l, a s t he F e d e r a l Avi a tion A d ministr a tion ( FAA ) h a s p re vious l y issu e d g r a nts of ex e mption in c irc um stan ce s simil a r in a ll mat e ri a l re sp e cts to those p re s e nted h e r e in. **FEDERAL REGISTER SUMMARY**  Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER, should it be determined that publication is needed: **Grand Valley**  **State University**  **– Annis**  **Water Resources**  **Institute seeks**  **an exemption**  **from the**  **following rules in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations: Part 21, Subpart H; Part 27** **; 45.23**  **(a) and (b); 45.27(a); 61.23(a) and (c);**  **61.101(e)(4) and (5); 61.113**  **(a) &**  **(b) ;**  **61:133; 61.315;**  **91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1);**  **91.409(a)(1) &**  **(2); 91.417**  **(a) &**  **(b) 91.7(a);**  **91.9(b)(2) &**  **(c) ;**  **91.103; 91.109(a); 91.119( c**  **); 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) & (b) .**  **The exemption**  **will enhance**  **safety by**  **reducing risk**  **to the**  **general public**  **and property**  **owners from**  **the substantial**  **hazards associated**  **with using**  **conventional fixed**  **- wing**  **aircraft or**  **rotorcraft for**  **aerial data collection in support of university education and research programs.** Page 2 of 2

U.S. D e p a rtme n t of T r a n sport a tion Do c k e t February 5, 2016

The name and address of the applicant’s representative is:

John K. Koches Associate Research Scientist Annis Water Resources Institut e Grand Valley State University Lake Michigan Center 740 W. Shoreline Drive Muskegon Michigan, 40441
- 1678 kochesj@gvsu.edu 616
- 331
- 3792 Signed:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1147 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1147

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to deliver notice of the denial of claims for benefits 
under the laws administered by the Secretary by certified mail, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

  Mr. Latta (for himself, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. 
 LaMalfa, Ms. Spanberger, Mr. San Nicolas, and Mr. Turner) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to deliver notice of the denial of claims for benefits 
under the laws administered by the Secretary by certified mail, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Right to Expediency Act''.

SEC. 2. DELIVERY OF NOTICE OF DENIAL OF BENEFITS UNDER LAWS 
              ADMINISTERED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS BY 
              CERTIFIED MAIL.

    Section 5104 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) In any case where the Secretary denies a benefit sought, the 
notice required by subsection (a) shall be delivered by certified 
mail.''.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE William Thomas PEOPLES

CR-16-0324

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Madison Cir. Ct.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American  Telstar,  Inc.
(the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
    information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
    particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
    prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of
    this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
    disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
    Evaluation Date;

5. We have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
    which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's
    auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls;
    and

6. We have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: October 29, 2007

By:  /s/ Michael L. Schumacher
     -------------------------------------
     Michael L. Schumacher - Secretary,
     Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
No. 32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, Russell A. Gerdin, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of
Heartland Express, Inc., on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Heartland Express,
Inc.








Dated:
      February 24, 2010
            By: /s/ Russell A. GerdinRussell
      A. GerdinChairman
      andChief
      Executive Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1 D 2 0 2 4

- 1021

_____________________________

K

ATRINA L. W ILLIAMS

, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dominique Alexandria
Bullard

,

Appellant,

v.

A REA H OUSING C OMMISSION

,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennifer J. Frydrychowicz , Judge

.

September 18, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.

D ISMISSED

. See Hoffman v. Hall , 817 So. 2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“An order which merely grants a motion to dismiss but does not actually enter a final judgment is nonfinal and nonappealable”).

L EWIS

, B.L. T HOMAS

, and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

_____________________________

Jonathan A. Martin and John S. Mills of Bishop Page & Mills, PLLC, Jacksonville; Linje Rivers and Kamaria H. Williams, Ponte Vedra, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          43,322
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (90)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,908
<PP&E>                                          34,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,169)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,843
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        214
<COMMON>                                         2,287
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,607
<SALES>                                         28,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,508
<CGS>                                           23,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.99)
        

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-22-00127-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

HOWARD ADAMS, Appellant,

v.

MICHELLE CAROL ATKINSON, Appellee.

On appeal from the 130th District Court 

of Matagorda County, Texas.
2

NUMBER 13-22-00128-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

IN THE ESTATE OF J.W. MASSEY, DECEASED.

 

On appeal from the County Court

of Matagorda County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

Appellant Howard Adams filed a notice of appeal on March 28, 2022 in appellate 

cause number 13-22-00127-CV, attempting to appeal the trial court’s “judgment dated 

March 22, 2022, as well as all prior orders merged therein, including the undated Order 

Granting Summary Judgment.” A second notice of appeal was also filed March 28, 2022 

in appellate cause number 13-22-00128-CV attempting to appeal “the judgment of the 
3

130th District Court in Cause No. 21-F-0434 dated March 22, 2022 which transferred that 

cause back to Cause No. PR20-0144, as well as all prior orders merged therein, including 

the undated Order Granting Summary Judgment in Cause No. 21-F-0434.” Subsequently, 

appellant filed an unopposed motion to consolidate the appeals in which he stated that 

the separate notices of appeal were filed “[o]ut of an abundance of caution,” as the case 

involved a transfer between the probate court and the 130th District Court. 

Upon review, it appears that appellant is attempting to appeal an “Order to Transfer

Back to County Court,” signed on March 22, 2022, which may not be a final, appealable 

order. Additionally, it appears that appellant’s notice of appeal might also be attempting 

to appeal an “Order Granting Summary Judgment,” signed in February 2022. Should this 

Court determine the summary judgment order is not final and appealable, this appeal may 

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, on this day, the Court orders appellant to 

file a short letter brief identifying law that clearly establishes this Court’s jurisdiction to 

review either or both orders within twenty days. Appellee may file a short response, if any, 

within ten days of appellant’s letter brief.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

19th day of April, 2022.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Steve Snyder-Hill, et al..

Plaintiffs,

V. Civil Action 2:18-cv-736

Judge Michael H. Watson

The Ohio State University,

Defendant.

Magistrate Judge Deavers

ORDER

Plaintiff John Doe 22 moves the Court to sever his claims from this case so

he can pursue his claims Individually. Mot., EOF No. 79. He also moves to

substitute Richard W. Schulte and the firm Wright &Schulte, LLC as counsel of

record In place of present counsel Scott E. Smith and Brian R. Noethllch with the

firm Scott Elliot Smith, LPA; Adele P. KImmel with Public Justice, P.C.; and

Debra Greenberger and Mann M. Maazel with Emery Celll Brinckerhoff &Abady

LLP. Finally, he moves to file an Amended Complaint. The Court previously

denied this motion temporarily during mediation. However, upon

reconsideration thereof. It now GRANTS John Doe 22's motion.

The clerk Is DIRECTED to (1) assign a new Individual case number for

John Doe 22; (2) mark this new case as related to the original action and assign

Itto the undersigned DistrictJudge; and (3) copy and transfer allfilings from the

Case: 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD Doc #: 116 Filed: 03/16/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1974
original action to the docket of the new case. Plaintiff must pay the requisite

filing fee within fourteen (14) days of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD Doc #: 116 Filed: 03/16/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1975
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                                SUBSIDIARIES OF
                            THE CENTRIS GROUP, INC.
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997


                            THE CENTRIS GROUP, INC.
                           (a Delaware corporation)


                     100%                                   100%
     USBenefits Insurance Services, Inc.         USF RE INSURANCE COMPANY
          (a California corporation)           (a Massachusetts corporation)

                                                              100%
                              100%                    US HOLDINGS, INC.
                INTERRA REINSURANCE GROUP, INC.  (a Delaware corporation)
                    (an Indiana corporation)
    
                                                              100%
                                                   USF INSURANCE COMPANY
                                                (a Pennsylvania corporation)


        100%
        INTERNATIONAL EXCESS RE, LIMITED
          (a British Virgin Islands
                corporation)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Steve Snyder-Hill, ef a/.,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:18-cv-736

V. Judge Michael H. Watson

The Ohio State University, Chief Magistrate Judge

Preston Deavers

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiffs' motion for orai argument, EOF No. 134, is DENIED.

Nonetheless, ifthe Court later determines that orai argument on the pending

motions would be useful, it shaii be scheduied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD Doc #: 149 Filed: 03/05/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 2691