alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.16








    Exhibit 10.16

    



 




    KATY
    INDUSTRIES, INC.

    





    DIRECTOR
    COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
    



 



    1. Retainer



 


			
	 	    a.  
	
    Each director receives a $10,000 annual retainer, paid annually
    in advance.




 


			
	 	    b.  
	
    Each director receives the cash equivalent of 2,000 shares
    of the Company’s common stock at the closing stock price
    the day prior to the annual meeting.




 


			
	 	    c.  
	
    The chair of the Compensation Committee and the chair of the
    Audit Committee each receive an additional $6,000 annual
    retainer, paid annually in advance.




 



    2.  Meeting Fees



 


			
	 	    a.  
	
    Each director is paid $2,500 for each full meeting of the board
    of directors he or she attends in person and $1,000 for each
    full meeting of the board of directors he or she attends
    telephonically.

	 
	 	    b.  
	
    Each director is paid $1,000 for each full committee meeting of
    the board of directors he or she attends in person and $500 for
    each full committee meeting of the board of directors he or she
    attends telephonically.




 


		
	    3.  	
    Stock Appreciation Rights




 


			
	 	    a.  
	
    Each director receives an annual stock appreciation right (SAR)
    grant of 2,000 stock appreciation rights at the May meeting of
    the board of directors each year. The exercise price is the fair
    market value on the date of grant. The director may exercise
    these stock appreciation rights at any time during the ten years
    from the date of grant.




 


		
	    4.  	
    Meeting Expenses




 


			
	 	    a.  
	
    Katy reimburses directors for their expenses incurred in
    attending meetings of the board of director and committee
    meetings of the board of directors.




 


		
	    5.  	
    Deferred Compensation Plan




 


			
	 	    a.  
	
    Each director may defer directors’ fees, retainers and
    other compensation paid for services as a director until the
    later of the director’s attainment of age 62 or
    ceasing to be a director. Each director has 30 days before
    the beginning of a Plan Year (as defined in the Directors’
    Deferred Compensation Plan) in which to elect to participate in
    the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors may
    invest these amounts in one or more investment alternatives
    offered by Katy. Directors may elect to receive distributions of
    deferred amounts in a lump sum or five annual installments.




 



    Note: Class II directors and those directors that are also
    officers do not receive the compensation described in this
    section for their service on the Board of Directors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,714
<PP&E>                                       1,388,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                 513,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 894,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,949
<BONDS>                                        785,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   894,278
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,776
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Robert J. WRIGHT, Dottie A. Wright, and 1300 S. Highland Corp., Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Assignor to Yasso, Inc., Assignee/Assignor to TMF 12, LLC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANJIT KAUR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73395

Agency No. A078-650-912

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Manjit Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration

judge’s order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings held in absentia. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion,

FILED

OCT 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73395

Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 890 (9th Cir. 2002), we grant the

petition for review. 

The agency abused its discretion when it concluded that Kaur did not show

exceptional circumstances for her absence from her hearing because the medical

documentation Kaur’s attorney presented at the scheduled hearing indicated that

Kaur was unable to attend the hearing due to her medical condition. Cf. CelisCastellano, 298 F.3d at 890-92 (in which alien made no showing of the seriousness

of his alleged asthma attack, did not notify the immigration court that he would be

absent, and did not seek medical attention until two weeks after the date of the

missed hearing).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4598-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for State of Mississippi (FEMA-4598-DR), dated May 4, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on January 14, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, James R. Stephenson, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Brett H. Howard as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-02259 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EX PARTE Jeffery HORTON

CR-16-0170

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Exhibit 24.2










STATE OF TEXAS                §


COUNTY OF DALLAS         §





POWER OF ATTORNEY





Know all men by these presents, that I, TILMAN J. FALGOUT, III, a Director of AMERICA’S CAR-MART INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes as said attorney-in-fact deems appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 14th day of June, 2011.








/s/ Tilman J. Falgout, III


TILMAN J. FALGOUT, III








ACKNOWLEDGMENT





Before me this 14th day of June 2011, came TILMAN J. FALGOUT, III, personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.








/s/ Lisa Rushing


NOTARY PUBLIC
Ronald ARMBRESTER v. STATE

CR-15-1226

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Valerie Nicole BRINKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4404

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Enigma Software Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
      M. Scarlata, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Richard M. Scarlata


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      29,
      2007
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lawrence M. Higby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ LAWRENCE M. HIGBY Lawrence M. Higby
Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the Securities and Exhange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1298 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1298

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, as the ``Technical Sergeant 
                 Marshal Roberts Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TECHNICAL SERGEANT MARSHAL ROBERTS POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1233 North Cedar Street in Owasso, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Technical Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Technical 
Sergeant Marshal Roberts Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30 , 2024

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 24

- 00165

- CV

FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ , Appellant

V.
OVATION SERVICES, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris Co un ty, Texas Trial C o urt Cause No. 2021

- 75436

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a February 9. 2024 “ notice of non

- suit part ial dismissal ” filed on Fe b ruary 9, 2024 b y appel lee Ovation Servi ces L L C , which resulted in a partial dismissal

. Ge nerally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191 , 19 5 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending part ies and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rend er ed unless a statutory2 exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson , 53 S.W.3d 352, 35 2 (T ex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (o rig. proceeding).
Appellant Francisco Rodriguez filed a notic e of appeal on Mar ch 04, 2024 specifying that Rod riguez “ wants to appeal [the] m o tion of non

- suit parti al
dismissa l filed

. ” On March 15, 2024, Ovation Services filed a motion to dismiss
for want of jurisdiction

. On May 1, 202 4, this court sent a notice of involuntary dis missal for want of jurisdictio n unless any party filed a respo nse showing meritoriou s gr ounds for continuing the appeal on or before May 15, 202 4

. See Tex. R . App

. P . 42.3(a). Rodriguez ’ s response fails to de monstrate that this court has jurisdiction o ver the appeal. A ccordingly, w e grant Ovation Services ’ motion and dis miss the appeal for want of jurisdiction

.
PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christoph er and Justices Spain and Poiss ant.
**Exhibit
      24.6**





STATE
      OF
      TEXAS             §


COUNTY
      OF
      DALLAS       §





POWER
      OF
      ATTORNEY





Know
      all
      men by these presents, that I, DANIEL J. ENGLANDER, a Director of AMERICA’S
      CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint TILMAN J.
      FALGOUT, III and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
      with
      full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007
      and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National
      Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto
      and
      other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
      stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,
      incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, hereby
      ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute
      or
      substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





In
      witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 13th day of
      July,
      2007.








/s/
      Daniel J.
      Englander


DANIEL
      J. ENGLANDER











ACKNOWLEDGMENT





Before
      me
      this 13th day
      of July, 2007, came Daniel J. Englander, personally known to me, who in my
      presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and
      acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.








/s/
      Mary Sellner
      Thomas


NOTARY
      PUBLIC
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1255, -1256

DIGITAL IMPACT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BIGFOOT INTERACTIVE, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Thomas E. Moore, III , The Moore Law Group, of Palo Alto, California, argued for

plaintiff-appellant.

Arthur M. Dresner , Duane Morris LLP, of New York, New York, argued for

defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Robert L. Byer , and Matthew C.

Mousley , of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Appealed from: United States District Cour t for the Northern District of California

Judge Saundra Brown ArmstrongNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1255, -1256

DIGITAL IMPACT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BIGFOOT INTERACTIVE, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-0636

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED March 10, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN A. SMITH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

RANDY GROUNDS, Warden; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-17768

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01410-EFB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted November 19, 2013*** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Brian A. Smith appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

FILED

DEC 11 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** Smith consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c).

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
defendants violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.

2000). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Smith’s action because Smith failed to

allege sufficient facts in his Fourth Amended Complaint showing that defendants

violated his constitutional rights. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)

(a plaintiff must allege facts that “allow[] the court to draw the reasonable

inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged”); see also Sandin

v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84 (1995) (protected liberty or property interest only

arises under Due Process Clause when a restraint imposes an “atypical and

significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison

life”); Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (for a deliberate indifference

claim, “the official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be

drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the

inference”); Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1207 (9th Cir. 2011) (elements for

supervisory liability under § 1983).

We do not consider allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See

2 12-17768
Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). 

AFFIRMED.

3 12-17768
Exhibit 99.1





C.M. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the
Report) of C.M. Life Insurance Company (the Company), I, Robert J. OConnell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





( 1 ) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





( 2 ) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





C.M. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (Registrant)





Date: November 12, 2002





By:

/s/    ROBERT J.
OCONNELLRobert J. OConnell Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer