alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1.9






Exhibit 10.1.9




January 30, 2009




Mr. Charles Elliott

Chief Financial Officer

Roberts Properties Residential, L.P.

450 Northridge Parkway

Suite 302

Atlanta, Georgia 30350




	 	 	 
	Re:

	 	Lease Renewal Option for 450 Northridge Parkway, Suite 301






Dear Charles:



Please accept this letter as the required notice of Tenant’s exercise of its final one (l) year
option to extend the Lease dated March 27, 2006 by and between Roberts Properties Residential,
L.P., a Georgia limited partnership (“Landlord”) and Roberts Properties Construction, Inc., a
Georgia corporation (“Tenant”) (the “Lease”).



We are exercising our option and we will abide by its terms that the Base Rent of the Extension
Term shall not be less than the Base Rent at the expiration of the applicable Lease Term.
Therefore, the rental rate will be $20.00 per sq. ft. and the Term shall be extended to December
31, 2009. Except as expressly stated herein, all other terms and conditions of the Lease shall
remain in full force and effect.



However, it should be noted that the current office rental market is soft and new leases at 450
Northridge Parkway will probably be in the $17.00 — $18.00 per square foot range. The effective
rental rate will be even lower given the need to provide tenant build out work for any new leases.
Based on the current market, our Base Rent of $20.00 per square foot is more than you could get
from a replacement tenant.



I would appreciate your acknowledging the above terms and conditions and returning an executed copy
of this Lease Agreement to me.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Sincerely,

	 	AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:
	 	 
	 

	 	Roberts Properties Residential, L.P.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Anthony Shurtz

	 	/s/ Charles Elliott	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Anthony Shurtz

	 	Charles Elliott, Chief Financial Officer	 	 
	Chief Financial Officer

	 	Roberts Realty Investors, Inc.,	 	 
	 

	 	Sole General Partner	 	 






Roberts
Properties Construction, Inc. 450 Northridge Parkway /
Suite 301 / Atlanta, GA 30350 / (770) 394-6000 / Fax
(770) 396-6708
Warren S. PINK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         249,545
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    355,226
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               836,813
<PP&E>                                         241,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,886,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,573,629
<BONDS>                                        650,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,795
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,342,964)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,886,460
<SALES>                                      5,262,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,006,761
<CGS>                                        2,960,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,198,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,290,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,383,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,186,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (17,186,902)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (7.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.94)


</TABLE>
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
ACTION PLAN
"INDOOR FIRING RANGES"

PURPOSE

This plan identifies corrective actions designed to control and reduce the number of unsafe
ARNG Indoor Firing Ranges (IFRs). It sets the milestones necessary to ensure that critical
program elements are established and implemented prior to range operation. The regulatory
guidance, and procedural methodology described in this plan are consistent with current
environmental safety & health practices and standards. Implementation of this plan will
safeguard personnel against exposure to Lead (Pb) in harmful amounts, and prevent release of
Lead into the environment. Additionally, it will allow ARNG components to safely reactivate
IFRs previously determined to be unsafe for operation.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS/INITIATIVES

The following corrective actions/initiatives are required as a result of the Department of Defense
Inspector Generals (DODIG) report No. 98-170 "Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve
Command Small Arms Indoor Firing Ranges":

1. The ARNG has developed regulatory guidance for operation, maintenance,
inspection/evaluation, rehabilitation, decontamination, conversion, and closure of IFRs. This
guidance was fielded in September 2000.

2. Each state and territory will re-evaluate and report the status of their IFRs to the NGB.
The evaluation reporting process will include an IFR inventory and classification of each range
(Safe, Unsafe, or Limited Use), a status report that describes the condition of each range (Closed,
Converted, Rehabilitated, Active or Inactive), and the final determination as to the disposition of
each range. Completion of the IFR evaluation process is expected by 28 February 2003.

3. NGB will review scope of work (SOW) documents, abatement plans, action plans, and/or
contracts for IFR rehabilitation, decontamination, conversion, or closure submitted by the states
and territories. Review of these documents will be completed as they are submitted, in support
of item 2 and 4 of this action plan.

4. All ARNG Indoor Firing Ranges will fully comply with governing health and safety
standards, and applicable DoD regulatory guidance. The Individual State and/or Territory
Hazard Abatement Programs will be used to eliminate identified hazards in conjunction with
implementation of the guidance. Significant reduction and effective control in the number of
unsafe indoor firing ranges will take approximately 10 years, Completion is expected by 28
February 2010.

SUMMARY

Execution of this plan requires close coordination between the NGB and the fifty-four States and
Territories. Budgetary resources must be identified/provided to fulfill the requirements of the
plan. Currently IFR rehabilitation, decontamination, conversion, and closure represent
unidentified and unfunded fiscal requirements. This could become an obstacle to executing the
provision of the plan. To resolve this pitfall, future budgetary forecast should reflect the need for
dedicated funding.
Thomas W. CUTLER and Ann Cutler, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4086

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 23, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellants' motion for rehearing en bane is stricken as insufficient, in that it fails to identify an issue of great public importance or explain how en bane consideration of the case is necessary to maintain consistency with this court's decisions. Appellants' motion for rehearing, for written opinion, or for certification is denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


     I, William B. Yarmuth,  Chief Executive Officer of Almost Family, Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the  Company  for the annual  period
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:    March 26, 2004                    By  /s/ William B. Yarmuth
         ------------------                 ------------------------
                                            William B. Yarmuth
                                             Chairman of the Board,
                                             President & Chief Executive Officer







      A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has
        been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
         and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
                                staff on request.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4527-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


South Dakota; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of South Dakota (FEMA-4527-DR), dated April 5, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on January 7, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Nancy J. 
Dragani, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Tammy L. Littrell as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02240 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01762]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-494-000.
    Applicants: Gulf States Transmission LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Cancellation of Tariff to be 
effective 1/21/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/21/22.
    Accession Number: 20220121-5067.
    Comment Date: 5 pm ET 2/2/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 24, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01762 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
IF SIX WERE NINE, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. LINCOLN ROAD III, LLC, etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 3D16-2614 3D17-895

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 04, 2018

Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, and Matthew M. Jackson and Eric J. Vasquez (Naples), for appellant.

Tobin & Reyes, P.A., and Ricardo A. Reyes and Sacha A. Boegem (Boca Raton), for appellees.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and SCALES, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, C.J.

*1188In this commercial lease dispute, If Six Were Nine, LLC, etc. ("the plaintiff") appeals the trial court's order dismissing all of the plaintiff's claims against Lincoln Road III, LLC, etc. ("Lincoln Road") and Terranova Corporation ("Terranova") and dismissing some of the plaintiff's claims against PPF LRIII Portfolio, LLC ("PPF"). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction as to PPF because there are related claims against PPF pending in the case below that have not yet been adjudicated. *See**Almacenes El Globo De Quito, S.A. v. Dalbeta L.C.*, 181 So.3d 559, 561-62 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).

However, we find that the trial court abused its discretion when it entered an order dismissing with prejudice all of the plaintiff's claims against Lincoln Road and Terranova because the plaintiff was given, in effect, no opportunity to amend its complaint to allege additional facts or other causes of action, despite the trial court's assurances that the plaintiff would have an opportunity to amend. *See**Vorbeck v. Betancourt*, 107 So.3d 1142, 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ("Where a party may be able to allege additional facts to support its cause of action or to support another cause of action based on a different legal theory, dismissal with prejudice is an abuse of discretion.") (quoting *Kapley v. Borchers*, 714 So.2d 1217, 1218 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) ); *Al-Hakim v. Holder*, 787 So.2d 939, 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (stating that "dismissal with prejudice is a severe sanction and one which was not warranted when Al-Hakim had not been given an opportunity to amend his petition").

The plaintiff amended its complaint once as a matter of right before any responsive pleading had been filed. Thus, the trial court's ruling on the defendants' motion to dismiss was the first time the sufficiency of the operative complaint had been tested. *See**Hawkins v. Crosby*, 910 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (stating that even if the plaintiff amended his complaint once as a matter of right pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(a), he should have been given another opportunity to amend because he had not abused the privilege). Under these circumstances, it was an abuse of discretion to preclude the plaintiff from amending its complaint.1 Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order dismissing the plaintiff's claims against Lincoln Road and Terranova and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Dismissed in part, reversed in part.

1

We express no opinion as to the merits of the plaintiff's claims or any potential defenses the defendants may have pursuant to the contracts in this case.
Exhibit 10.8


        English Translation of Settlement Agreement


        	
	
                
                    Party A: Sentaida Tire Company Limited
                

            
	
	
                
                    Party B: Sentaida Rubber Co. Ltd.
                

            
	
	
                
                    Party C: Dongsen Tire Co., Ltd.
                

            



        


        Sentaida Tire Company Limited directly and indirectly owns the following companies: Qingdao Free-Trade-Zone Sentaida International Trade Co. Ltd., Zhongsen International Company Group Limited, Zhongsen Holdings Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Sentaida Tires Co., Ltd. As of December 31, 2008, Party A had receivables from Party B in an amount of $32,963,259 and Party A’s payable to Party C was $19,696,210. Through friendly consultation, Party A, Party B and
        Party C have reached the following agreement: 


        Party B assumes Party A’s liabilities to Party C, which offsets equivalent amount of Party B’s payables to Party A.  


        This Agreement is made in three (3) originals and each Party should hold one original. This Agreement becomes effective once it is signed by the Parties.


         


        


        	Party A:	 	 	Party B:	 	 	Party C	 	 
	/s/ Long Qin	 	 	Seal	 	 	Seal	 	 
	December 31, 2008	 	 	December 31, 2008	 	 	December 31, 2008
Edward SAUTHOFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3956

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Edward Sauthoff, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Nesbitt v. State*, 889 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 2004) ; *McDonald v. State*, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ; *Sauthoff v. State*, 56 So. 3d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision); *Doby v. State*, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Hughes v. State*, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Valdez-Garcia v. State*, 965 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; *Brown v. State*, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; *Harris v. State*, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ; *Harris v. State*, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-24-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                          35,695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    171,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               263,220
<PP&E>                                         409,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 589,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,002
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (52,189)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   589,367
<SALES>                                      1,204,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,204,454
<CGS>                                          911,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  911,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               282,992
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,425)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,324)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,101)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (182.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (182.02)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant and its
subsidiaries.
 /s/ Gary C. ParksGary C. ParksTreasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)November 10, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


          I, William B. Yarmuth,  Chief Executive Officer of Almost Family, Inc.
     (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
     of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company  for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2004  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements  of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date:    March  31, 2005                   By /s/ William B. Yarmuth
         ------------------                    ------------------------
                                               William B. Yarmuth
                                               Chairman of the Board,
                                               President & Chief
                                               Executive Officer







    A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been
    provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
       to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.