alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Moise LAPOINTE and Lisa LaPointe, Appellants v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Successor Trustee to Lasalle Bank National Association, on behalf of the Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE8 Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2005-HE8, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4724

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. Willie PRICE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0305

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

Not considered. Relator has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court of appeal before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, A. Bradley Gabbard, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  August 12, 2005                          /s/  A. Bradley Gabbard
                                                --------------------------------
                                                A. Bradley Gabbard
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Con. Res. 27 Agreed to April 12, 2021

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-one 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the remains of the late United States Capitol Police 

Officer William F. Evans shall be permitted to lie in honor in 

the rotunda of the Capitol on April 13, 2021, and the Architect 

of the Capitol, under the direction of the Speaker of the House 

of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, 

shall take all necessary steps for the accomplishment of that purpose. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
EX PARTE Terry Lamar JONES

CR-16-0235

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
William Anthony SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-924

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Russell Rumbaugh

##                 Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management & Comptroller)            

The Honorable Russell Rumbaugh was sworn in as the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management & Comptroller) on January 3, 2023. He directly oversees management of the Department of the Navy’s (DON’s) annual budget exceeding $240 billion while leading, mentoring, and developing the DON’s community of over 9,200 financial managers.  He spearheads the DON’s financial management transformation, including the financial statement audit and modernization of financial systems. These efforts support mission accomplishment for Fleet commands, Marine Expeditionary Forces and all naval forces within the Department.

Mr. Rumbaugh has previously worked on national security budgets in the Department of Defense, the U.S. Congress, and at think tanks. Mr. Rumbaugh served in the Office of the Secretary of Defense’s Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office twice, on the Senate Budget Committee, and on personal staff in the House of Representatives.

He also studied defense budgets at the Stimson Center, Aerospace and the Congressional Research Service. Mr. Rumbaugh has taught defense budgets at Georgetown University, George Mason University, and the University of Maryland, and published widely on the subject. He began his career as a U.S. Army infantry officer.

Mr. Rumbaugh holds degrees in political science and security studies from the University of Chicago and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a Certified Defense Financial Manager with Acquisition Specialty.
Jean Ernst JOSEPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3766

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this *Anders*1 appeal, we affirm the trial court's disposition and sentence in appellant's violation of probation proceeding. However, we remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. *See**Clark v. State* , 201 So.3d 799, 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). The judge specified those conditions on the record, but a written order is required to incorporate those findings.

*Affirmed and remanded with instructions.*

May, Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

1

*Anders v. California* , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Michael Joseph LARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3823

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-11161, 33-22862, 333-31116, 33-31117, 33-56707, 33-50610,
33-50608, 333-01409, 33-31371, 333-31369, 333-61843, and 333-70323) pertaining
to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Employee Stock Option Plans of
Informix Corporation of our report dated March 2, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows, and
schedule of Informix Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997, included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
February 25, 2000
Alexander Corey BOYNTON, DOC #C10960, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3581

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50535

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO JESUS MARTINEZ-ALFARO, also

known as Francisco Rendon Martinez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CR-608-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Jesus

Martinez-Alfaro concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed

by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further

review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu

of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                                UROLOGIX, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                      Three Months Ended                 Six Months Ended,
                                                          December 31,                      December 31,
                                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       1996            1995             1996             1995
<S>                                                <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
                                             
Net loss                                            ($1,597,448)     ($1,746,598)     ($3,387,133)     ($3,173,994)
                                                    ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

Weighted average common shares outstanding (1)        9,148,655        5,224,255        9,139,732        5,224,304

Effect of cheap shares issued (2)                             -          784,234                           784,234
                                                    -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------
                                                      9,148,655        6,008,489        9,139,732        6,008,538
                                                    ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
Loss per common share                                    ($0.17)          ($0.29)          ($0.37)          ($0.53)
                                                    ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE> 


(1) All shares of preferred stock which were converted to common stock in
conjunction with the initial public offering have been included in the
calculation of weighted average common shares as if converted for all periods
presented.

(2) All preferred shares issued and options granted from April 5, 1995 to April
4, 1996 are included in the calculation for periods prior to the initial public
offering presented in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 4(D).
# Appendix E

MOVES Modeling

Documentation and IAC

minutes

(MOVES files located on included disk)DRAFT MINUTES

Interagency Consultation Alabama Transportation Conformity

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Monday, April 19, 2010
2:00p.m. – 4:00 p.m. CST

----------------------------------------------AGENDA---------------------------------------------------------

1. Introductions

2. Approval of March 8, 2010 meeting minutes

3. Discuss the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (ADEM)

4. Open Discussion

------------------------------------------DISCUSSION SUMMARY --------------------------------------

1. Introductions

2. Approval of March 8, 2010 meeting minutes

3. Discuss the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (ADEM)

Mr. Harry He with RPC had a se ries of questions for ADEM.

a. Mr. He asked about the 25% margin applied to the Mobile Source Emissions budget numbers. Ms. Lisa Cole with ADEM responded that the 25% was chosen based on precedent and asked Mr. He if there was a need to increase the per cent safety margin contributed to the Mobile Source Emissions budge t numbers. Mr. He said no.

b. Mr. He asked about the base years for the various NAAQS that budgets had been set for. Ms. Cole stated that the base year for the

annual standard and the ozone sta ndard was 2002. The base year

for the 2008 24hr PM 2.5 NAAQS would have been set by guidance.

c. Mr. He voiced his concern that we have budgets set by Mobile6, but will be running MOVES to establish conformity with those budgets. He asked about resetting the budget s with MOVES. Ms. Cole asked

to table that discussion so that so me comparisons could be made to

determine the need.

Ms. Cole asked each agency to state if they approved or disapproved of the proposed 24hr PM 2.5 motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2024 for

NO X and PM 2.5

. ADEM: approved ALDOT: approved JCDH: approved RPCGB: approved FHWA-AL: approved EPA R4: approved

4. Open Discussion

The next IAC call will be held on May 10, 2010, at 2PM. ADEM:

Tracy Anderson 

### ; Lisa Cole 

### ; Anthony Smiley

Lisa Hicks 

### ; Dale Hurst

Amanda Carter
Sabrina Rog

Marcelle McCloud 

### ; Chris Howard

ALDOT:
Natasha Clay

Alfedo Acoff

Kathy Ann Bolling

Lance Taylor

Jim Doolin

Bill Couch 

### ; Sandra Bonner

Adam Promesse 

### ; Victor Jordan

Brian Fair
Kimberly Obradovich

JCDH:

Jason Howanitz 

### ; Matt Lacke

Sam Bell

Dave Wootton

RPCGB:

Bill Foisey 

### ; Harry He 

### ; Darrell Howard

Scott Rumble 

### ; Mike Kaczorowski

FHWA-AL: 

### ; David Harris

Lynne Urquhart

Lynne Heisler

U.S. EPA Region 4: 

### ; Amanetta Somerville
Stacey Harder

Lynorae Benjamin

Dianna Smith
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0 371 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICKEY PAYNE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including May 27 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 20 2021

04/20/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0371
**Exhibit 10.45**

**AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE CARMIKE CINEMAS, INC.**

**ANNUAL EXECUTIVE BONUS PROGRAM**

Pursuant to its authority to amend the Carmike Cinemas, Inc. Annual Executive Bonus Program (the “Program”) set forth in Section 8, theCommittee hereby amends the Program, effective as of January 1, 2009. 

**WITNESSETH:**

WHEREAS, Committee desires to amend the Program effective as of January 1, 2009 to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code(“Code”); 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment,the Committee hereby amends the Program as follows effective as of January 1, 2009: 

§1 

By amending §5, Certification, to add the following language to the end of the last sentence of such section: 

“; provided, however, to the extent required to avoid the imposition of an additional tax under §409A of the Code, where the Committee exercisesits discretion to pay a bonus to a Participant who is not employed with Carmike on the date the bonus is to be paid, the bonus payment to such Participant shall be paid no later than the March 15 immediately following the year in which theCommittee acts to waive the employment requirement.” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has adopted this Amendment Number One byresolution dated the 3rd day of December, 2008.
Harold MCKINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4044

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 20, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1070 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1070

  To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit States from 
      using proprietary voting system hardware or software in the 
  administration of an election for Federal office which prevents the 
    system from meeting the voluntary voting system guidelines for 
  interoperability and auditability issued by the Election Assistance 
                       Commission under such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2021

  Mr. Posey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit States from 
      using proprietary voting system hardware or software in the 
  administration of an election for Federal office which prevents the 
    system from meeting the voluntary voting system guidelines for 
  interoperability and auditability issued by the Election Assistance 
                       Commission under such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Election Audit Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF PROPRIETARY VOTING SYSTEM HARDWARE OR 
              SOFTWARE NOT ENABLING AUDITS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 301(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 
2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(7) Prohibiting use of proprietary hardware or software 
        not meeting voluntary guidance for interoperability and 
        auditability.--The voting system may not use any proprietary 
        hardware or software unless the manufacturer of the hardware or 
        software provides the appropriate election official with such 
        information and assistance as the official may require to 
        enable the voting system to be interoperable and auditable in 
        accordance with the most recent voluntary voting system 
        guidelines issued by the Commission under this title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 301(d) of such Act (52 U.S.C. 
21081(d)) is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 
the following: ``, or, in the case of the requirements of paragraph (7) 
of subsection (a), on and after January 1, 2022.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7768

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM LARNELL ECKLES, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:00-cr-00046-RLV-4)

Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 19, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Larnell Eckles, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth 

Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Larnell Eckles, Jr., appeals the district 

court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(C)(2) (2006) motion 

for a sentence reduction.* We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Eckles, No. 

5:00-cr-00046-RLV-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2012). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Although the district court granted Eckles’s motion, 

Eckles contends on appeal that he was entitled to an even 

further reduction.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Michael A. Angerthal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 4, 2009



|                        
|------------------------
|/S/ MICHAEL A.
ANGERTHAL
|Michael A. Angerthal    
|Chief Financial Officer 



26