alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NATIONAL GUARD

STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM

FACT SHEET

PARTNERSHIP “Building Relationshipsthat Enhance Global Security, Understanding, and Cooperation”

The National Guard has forged enduring partnerships through the State Partnership Program (SPP) for 30 years 

while helping to build U.S. and partner capacity to meet 21st century security challenges.

THE PROGRAM

Beginning as a program to assist countries emerging from behind the Iron Curtain, the SPP now involves more than 

50% of the world’s countries paired with the National Guard of every U.S. state and territory. Most of the earliest SPP 

partner countries in Europe have gone on to become U.S. allies in NATO, and many of them credit the SPP, and their 

National Guard state partners, with helping make that possible. This cost-effective, small footprint program delivers a 

significant return on investment by broadening the pool of foreign security partners.

MISSION

The SPP supports the security 

cooperation objectives of the United 

States and the Geographic Combatant 

Commands (GCC) by developing 

enduring relationships with partner 

countries and carrying out activities to 

build partner capacity, improve 

interoperability, and enhance U.S. access 

and influence while increasing the 

readiness of U.S. and partner forces to 

meet emerging challenges.

CODIFIED IN LAW

NATIONAL DEFENSE

The SPP is strategically important 

to our national defense. National 

Guard service members’ efforts 

make vital contributions to the 

Joint Force, executing national 

defense strategy by advancing 

multinational understanding and 

support. The SPP helps the United 

States react effectively to 

anticipated or unanticipated global 

scenarios as they emerge.

In Section 341 of Title 10, United States Code, Congress authorized the secretary of defense to establish a program 

of activities “to support the Security Cooperation objectives of the United States, between members of the 

National Guard of a State or territory and any of the following: a) the military forces of a foreign country, b) the 

security forces of a foreign country, c) governmental organizations of a foreign country whose primary functions 

include disaster response or emergency response.”

The SPP is a Department of Defense security cooperation program, managed and administered by the chief, National 

Guard Bureau, executed by the GCCs, and sourced by the National Guard of the states and territories. The SPP supports 

the security cooperation objectives of the appropriate GCC and U.S. chief of mission.

$45M Annual 

Budget 

106 

 Countries 

 1,000+ Events Annually
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of New World Brands, Inc.;(the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(i) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: April 15, 2010 | By:                     | /s/ R. Steven Bell |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------|
|                      | R. Steven Bell          |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Valassis Communications, Inc. (the
Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge and belief that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert L. Recchia  
|                   |  |  |  | Robert L. Recchia      
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAY-21-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                 20,106
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         543,024
<ALLOWANCES>                          (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                           242,665
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      785,795
<PP&E>                                209,203
<DEPRECIATION>                       (128,876)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     29,904,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,929,148
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                             1,144
<COMMON>                              732,716
<OTHER-SE>                         20,217,059
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       29,904,901
<SALES>                               360,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      360,441
<CGS>                                 322,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         322,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      748,934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     18,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (729,638)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (729,638)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                         (729,638)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.05)



</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed May 1, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1719

Lower Tribunal No. 21-25582

________________

John Doe,

Appellant,

vs.

Soothe, Inc., et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Vivianne Del 

Rio, Judge.

Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC, and Morgan L. Weinstein (Fort 

Lauderdale), for appellant.

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., and Thomas A. Valdez, 

Megan G. Colter and Chanelle Artiles (Tampa), for appellee Soothe, Inc.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Medytox Sols., Inc. v. Investorshub.com, Inc., 152 So. 

3d 727, 730 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“The plain language of section 230 [of the 

Communications Decency Act] ‘creates a federal immunity to any cause of 

action that would make service providers liable for information originating 

with a third-party user of the service.’” (quoting Zeran v. Am. Online, Inc., 

129 F.3d 327, 330 (4th Cir. 1997))); Doe v. Am. Online, Inc., 783 So. 2d 

1010, 1018 (Fla. 2001) (“We specifically concur that section 230 expressly 

bars ‘any actions’ and we are compelled to give the language of this 

preemptive law its plain meaning.”); White v. Discovery Commc’ns, LLC, 365 

So. 3d 379, 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023) (“Section 230 clearly preempts Florida 

law.”); Steiner Transocean Ltd. v. Efremova, 109 So. 3d 871, 873 (Fla. 3d 

DCA 2013) (“[A] court is permitted to consider evidence outside the four 

corners of the complaint where the motion to dismiss challenges subject

matter jurisdiction or personal jurisdiction, or where the motion to dismiss is 

based upon forum non conveniens or improper venue.”) (footnotes omitted); 

Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum, 912 So. 2d 561, 568 (Fla. 2005) (“Florida courts, 

including this Court, have held that the issue of federal preemption is a 

question of subject matter jurisdiction.”); Hernandez v. Coopervision, Inc., 

661 So. 2d 33, 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (stating “the issue of federal 

preemption is a question of subject matter jurisdiction”); Doe v. Kik 
3

Interactive, Inc., 482 F. Supp. 3d 1242, 1252 (S.D. Fla. 2020) (“Futility 

justifies the denial of leave to amend where the complaint, as amended, 

would still be subject to dismissal.” (citing Burger King Corp. v. Weaver, 169 

F.3d 1310, 1320 (11th Cir. 1999))); Am. Online, Inc., 783 So. 2d at 1013

(“[We] find that section 230 does preempt Florida law as to such a cause of 

action based upon alleged negligence.”) (emphasis added); Medytox, 152 

So. 3d at 730 (“[T]he Florida Supreme Court held that section 230 preempts 

Florida law as to causes of action based in negligence against an Internet 

Service Provider as a distributor of information.”) (emphasis added).
Exhibit 23.1

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 33-42259 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 1986 Stock OptionPlan, No. 33-93816 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, No. 33-93818 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan, No. 333-84657 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 1998 Long Term Incentive Planand No. 333-68200 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan, Nos. 333-91068 and 333-93305 pertaining to the CytRx Corporation Employee Benefit Plan and to the Registration Statements on Form S-3Nos. 33-93820, 333-39607, 333-44043, 333-48837, 333-45652, 333-33792, 333-68092 and 333-100947 of CytRx Corporation and in the related prospectuses of our report dated March 25, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsand schedule of CytRx Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|                | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                |                           |   |
| Atlanta, Georgia    |                      |   |
| March 25, 2003 |                      |   |
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 20, 2010

s1213 

# Order

December 20, 2010

141041

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141041 COA: 288999 Allegan CC: 08-015728-FC KENNETH JAMES PHELPS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Section 

33-15-04-01 

33-15-04-02 

CHAPTER 33-15-04 

OPEN BURNING RESTRICTIONS 

Refuse Burning Restrictions 

Permissible Open Burning 

33-15-04-02. Permissible open burning. 
2. The following conditions apply to all types of permissible burning listed 

in subsection 1. 

a. Air pollution, as defined in section 33-15-01-04, will not be created. 

2 
History: Amended effective October 1, 1987; January 1, 1989; January 1, 1996; 

January 1, 2007; April 1, 2014. 

General Authority: NDCC 23-25-03, 28-32-02 

Law Implemented: NDCC 23-25-03 

3
#### NORDSTROM et al. v. ALASKA, SOUTHERN AIRWAYS, Inc.

No. 3494-A.

First Division. Juneau.

Dec. 11, 1933.

*455W. L. Paul, of Juneau, for plaintiff.

H. L. Faulkner, of Juneau, for defendant.

ALEXANDER, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that the same does not state facts sufficient" to constitute a cause of action against the defendant.

 The court is in doubt as to the remedy sought by plaintiffs in their complaint. At the argument, plaintiffs’ counsel contended that plaintiffs had a special property in the hangar mentioned in their complaint, by reason of certain work done thereon by plaintiffs which, it is contended, created a common-law lien on said hangar in favor of the plaintiffs, and that the plaintiffs sóught by this action to recover the hangar in order to foreclose their supposed common-law lien, or, if the specific property could not be recovered, that they recover the value thereof.

A common-law lien is the right given by .the common law to artisans on materials in their possession for labor bestowed on them. 18 R.C.L. 873. This lien ceased to exist, however, as soon as the artisan lost possession of the articles against which the lien was claimed, and it is immaterial how the possession was lost. Therefore, having lost possession of the hangar, plaintiffs also lost their lien and have no special property in the hangar upon which even an action for replevin can be based. Furthermore, the allegations of the complaint fall far short of the allegations necessary in a complaint for replevin as well as differing from replevin in other respects.

The court is therefore unable to see any theory upon which the complaint can be sustained; and the demurrer will therefore be sustained, and it is so ordered.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1217 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1217

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs from transmitting certain information to the 
    Department of Justice for use by the national instant criminal 
                        background check system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2021

 Mr. Bost (for himself and Ms. Cheney) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs from transmitting certain information to the 
    Department of Justice for use by the national instant criminal 
                        background check system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TRANSMITTAL OF 
              CERTAIN INFORMATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR USE 
              BY THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 5501A the following new section:
``Sec. 5501B. Prohibition on transmittal of certain information to the 
              Department of Justice for use by the national instant 
              criminal background check system
    ``The Secretary may not transmit to any entity in the Department of 
Justice, for use by the national instant criminal background check 
system established under section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence 
Prevention Act, personally identifiable information of a beneficiary, 
solely on the basis of a determination by the Secretary to pay benefits 
to a fiduciary for the use and benefit of the beneficiary under section 
5502 of this title, without the order or finding of a judge, 
magistrate, or other judicial authority of competent jurisdiction that 
such beneficiary is a danger to themselves or others.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 5501A the following new item:

``5501B. Prohibition on transmittal of certain information to the 
                            Department of Justice for use by the 
                            national instant criminal background check 
                            system.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Secretary Carlos Del Toro Releases 2024 Black History Month Message and Video to the Force

#### 02 Feb 2024

03:05VIDEO  | 03:05 |2024 SECNAV Black History Month Video

February is Black History Month.  It is an opportunity to pay tribute to the remarkable contributions of African-American Service Members and civilians who have and continue to serve our Nation with unwavering dedication.

The legacy of African-Americans in the sea services spans centuries, dating to 1775 where their service has been characterized by our core values of honor, courage, and commitment. Throughout various conflicts, African-American Sailors and Marines displayed unparalleled courage, contributing to our Nation's victories both at home and abroad.  From the Revolutionary War, where Sailors like James Forten fought alongside Captain Stephen Decatur, to the Civil War, where one in five Union Sailors were African-American and eight were awarded the Medal of Honor - their patriotism has left an indelible mark on naval history. In World War II, over 17,000 African-Americans enlisted as Montford Point Marines, marking a pivotal moment in the Corps' history.

This year, we proudly introduce our newest destroyer, the USS CHARLES J. FRENCH (DDG 142), and commission the USS JOHN L. CANLEY (ESB 6). These vessels stand as enduring tributes to two African-American leaders, Petty Officer Charles J. French and Sergeant Major John L. Canley, who, until now, had not received the recognition their service deserves. Their names will now grace these ships, serving as beacons of inspiration for generations to come.

French's heroic actions in September 1942 during the Imperial Japanese Navy's sinking of his ship, the USS GREGORY (DD 82), exemplified our core values. In the aftermath, French gathered 15 shipmates onto a raft and, fearing they would drift to a Japanese-controlled island, towed the raft himself to a different island. Swimming for hours and defying all odds to save his shipmates, French embodied what it means to serve a Nation, and more importantly, his Navy brethren.

Canley's extraordinary leadership during the Vietnam War further emphasizes the valor of African-American Service Members. During the Battle of Hue, Canley served as the Company Gunnery Sergeant for Alpha Company, 1st Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment. In February 1968, Canley and his Marines fought off multiple attacks as they patrolled city streets to relieve another company of Marines. He repeatedly rushed across gunfire-swept terrain to carry wounded Marines to safety and, when his company commander was wounded during the fire-fight, Canley took command of his company and led the Marines through the battle. For his courageous actions, Canley was awarded the Medal of Honor in 2018.

As we reflect on Black History Month, let us honor the valiant leaders of the past and present who have contributed to making the world's finest Navy and Marine Corps. Together we celebrate the diversity and strength that enriches our sea services.

Released by the Honorable Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy.
exv10w16









Exhibit 10.16




THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

LONG RANGE PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN




409A Amendment




     Pursuant to Section 12 of The TJX Companies, Inc. Long Range Performance Incentive Plan (as
amended, the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2008 as follows:


1. A new sentence is hereby inserted between the first and second sentences of the second paragraph
of Section 7(c), which sentence shall read in its entirety as follows:



“Notwithstanding the foregoing, no participant will be deemed to have a nonforfeitable right to
payment of any prorated Award until the end of such Performance Cycle, and then only to the extent
provided under the terms of such Award.”



2. A new sentence is hereby added to the end of second paragraph of Section 7(d), which sentence
shall read in its entirety as follows:



“Notwithstanding the foregoing, no participant will be deemed to have a nonforfeitable right to
payment of any prorated Award until the end of such Performance Cycle, and then only to the extent
provided under the terms of such Award.”



3. A new sentence is hereby inserted between the first and second sentences of Section 8, which
sentence shall read in its entirety as follows:



“Notwithstanding the foregoing, no participant will be deemed to have a nonforfeitable right to
payment of any prorated Award until the end of such Performance Cycle, and then only to the extent
provided under the terms of such Award.”



4. A new Section 8A is hereby added to read in its entirety as follows:



“8A. Payment



As soon as practicable after the end of each Performance Cycle and the valuation of the award for
such Performance Cycle, but in no event later than two and one-half (21/2) months after the later of
the end of the calendar year or the fiscal year of the Company in which such Performance Period
ends, payment (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any prorated payment made pursuant to
Sections 7(c) and 7(d) and Section 8) shall be made in cash with respect to the award earned by
each Participant for such Performance Cycle. Any such payment shall be subject to applicable
withholding as set forth in Section 16 below. Payments hereunder are intended to constitute
short-term deferrals exempt from Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and
the regulations thereunder and shall be construed and administered accordingly.”




 









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The TJX Companies, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name
and behalf by its officer thereunto duly authorized.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/ Jeffrey G. Naylor 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	     
	 

	 	Title:	 	Chief Administrative Officer 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	     






Dated:
December 19, 2008
John Henry ALLEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5205

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 10, 2018

John Henry Allen, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moot.

Osterhaus, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Title

Improvement of WASP eutrophication model in 

Baiyangdian water area.

Authors

Wang XuDong; Liu SuLing; Zhang ShuShen; Chen 

JingWen

Journal

Environmental Science & Technology (China) 2009 Vol. 32 

No. 10 pp. 19-24 

ISSN

1003-6504

URL

http://fjks.chinajournal.net.cn

Record Number

20093309749

Abstract

Effects of zooplankton on nutrition and dissolved oxygen (DO) were incorporated into water quality 

analysis simulation program (WASP) eutrophication model formerly developed by USEPA, so as to 

describe the lake eutrophication process more comprehensively. An ecological model was built, which 

involved 9 variables including phytoplankton, zooplankton, nitrogen, phosphorus and DO, for the purpose 

to reveal the correlation of variables and variation rule of the lake eutrophication. The original and 

improved WASP models were comparatively used for Baiyangdian Lake, Hebei Province, to describe the 

variation of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, DO and carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand in 2004. 

Results indicated that the improved WASP model was more consistent with the observed data, especially 

for phytoplankton, total nitrogen and carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand, which showed the 

variation process of variables in a year.