alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BestNet
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael A. Kramarz, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                            /s/  Michael A. Kramarz
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Michael A. Kramarz
                                                 Controller
December 12, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02264]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4619-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

California; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of California (FEMA-4619-DR), dated September 12, 2021, and 
related determinations.

DATES: The amendment was issued December 14, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident for 
this declared disaster has been changed to wildfires to include the 
Cache Fire.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02264 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 3, 2015 N o. 04

- 15

- 00114

- CV Hari Prasad KALAKONDA and Latha Kalakonda ,

Appellant s
v. ASPRI INVESTMENTS, LLC ,

Appellee From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 16394 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The court has received a letter dated May 21, 2015, from Hari Prasad Kalakonda and Latha Kalakonda, appellants in A ppeal No. 04

- 15

- 00114

- CV. This appeal is from the trial court ’s final judgment confirming an arbitration award in trial court cause no. 2014

- CI

- 16394. In t he letter , appellants assert that the proceedings in a new trial court cause ( no. 2015

- CI

- 01910) are integrally related to the issues in this appeal . Appellants request this court to review the actions of the trial court in trial court no. 2015

- CI

- 01910 in this appeal from tr i al court no. 2014

- CI

- 16394. We construe the letter as the Kalakond a s ’ notice of appeal from an order in trial court cause no. 2015

- CI

- 01910 and a request to consolidate the new app eal with appeal no. 04

- 15

- 00114

- CV. We order the C lerk of this court to open a new appeal from trial court number 2015

- CI

01910 , and to style the appeal , Hari Prasad Kalakonda and Latha Kalakonda, Appellants, v. Aspri Investments, LLC, Appellee. The ne w appeal will be Appeal No. 04 - 15 - 00340 - CV
. We order the Clerk to file cop ies of appellants’ May 21, 2015 letter and this order in both appeals and to send cop ies of the letter and this order to the trial court clerk for filing. We order a ppellants must pay the appellate filing fee for the new appeal to the Clerk of this court by June 8, 2015 . We further order appellants must file an amen d ed notice of appeal in Appeal No. 04 - 15 - 00340 - CV by June 8, 2015 , identifying and stating the date of the judgmentor order in trial court no. 2015

- CI

- 01910 they are appealing from. If appellants fail to pay the

appellate filing fee or to file an amended notice of appeal as ordered, the n ew appeal may be dismissed. Appellants must also request the t rial court clerk and court reporter to file the record in the new appeal
. If the appeal is from an interlocutory order, t he appeal is accelerated and the record is due ten days after the notice of appeal is filed. After a clerk’s re cord has been filed in the new appeal and if we determine we have jurisdiction over the appeal, the court will consider whether to consolidate the appeals for purposes of briefing and argument
.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of June, 2015
.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0574 Directorate ID: 2008-SW-22-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 407 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 464 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent separation of the tailboom and 

subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $82,850 to replace a tailboom, which is under 

warranty per Bell ASB 407-07-80, dated 8-27-07

Labor per Helicopter

(.5 to annotate the helicopter 

records, 1.5 to prepare the 

inspection area and do the 

magnification inspection, and 

2.5 work-hours to do the 100-

hour TIS inspection x 

$85/work-hour based on 6 

repetitive inspections the first 

year)

$1,445

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $1,445

Total US Fleet Cost $670,480

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Sharon Miles
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



|(1) | The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 9, 2006



/s/ Fred B. ParksFred B. ParksChairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Todd E. PaulsonTodd E. PaulsonVice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 71 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 71

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2022

   Mr. Cawthorn submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     limit the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has served six terms as a Representative 
shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives. For 
purposes of this section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in 
the House of Representatives shall be included as one term in 
determining the number of terms that such person has served as a 
Representative if the person fills the vacancy for more than one year.
    ``Section 2. No person who has served two terms as a Senator shall 
be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of 
this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy 
in the Senate shall be included as one term in determining the number 
of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills 
the vacancy for more than three years.
    ``Section 3. This article shall not apply to any person serving a 
term as a Member of Congress on the date of the ratification of this 
article.''.
                                 <all>
```
Timothy Scott TURNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D17-1740 & 4D17-1741

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 7, 2017]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Warner, Gross and Forst, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT


To the Board of Directors New World Brands, Inc.

We have issued our report dated July 27, 2004 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of New World Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004, which is
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement Forms S-8 dated April
23, 2002, May 16, 2002 and July 22, 2003. We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements of the aforementioned report.


                                        /s/ MAHONEY COHEN & COMPANY, CPA, P.C.


New York, New York
August 26, 2004
Timothy WALDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-0878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 25, 2018

Timothy Walden, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Ray, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 24.2

STATE OF TEXAS      §
COUNTY OF DALLAS      §

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know
all men by these presents, that I, TILMAN J. FALGOUT, III, a Director of
AMERICAS CAR-MART INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM
H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for AMERICAS CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30,
2008 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits
thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf
and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual
Report, incorporating such changes as said attorney-in-fact deems appropriate,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his
substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

In
witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of July,
2008.

|                             | 
|---------------------------- | 
|/s/ Tilman
  J. Falgout, III | 
|                             | 
|TILMAN J.
  FALGOUT, III     | 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Before
me this 3rd day of July, 2008, came TILMAN J. FALGOUT, III,
personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and
foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.

|                   | 
|------------------ | 
|/s/ Paula
  Hodges | 
|                   | 
|NOTARY
  PUBLIC    | 

67

---
ALD-161 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-1284

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

GILBERT ROBINSON,

Appellant

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Crim. No. 03-cr-00121-001)

District Judge: Honorable John E. Jones III

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Summary Action 

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

April 19, 2012

Before: SLOVITER, FISHER and WEIS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed May 2, 2012)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM.

In May 2004, Gilbert Robinson pleaded guilty to conspiracy to deliver in excess of 

50 grams of crack cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The District Court 

sentenced him to 292 months of imprisonment, and we affirmed the sentence. United 
2

States v. Robinson, 186 F. App’x 240 (3d Cir. 2006). Robinson then filed an 

unsuccessful 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, and we denied Robinson’s application for a 

certificate of appealability. He has since filed several unsuccessful challenges to his 

conviction. 

On November 23, 2011, Robinson filed a motion for the recusal of the District 

Court Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 & 455. The District Court dismissed the 

motion because there were no matters pending. Robinson filed a timely notice of appeal.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The District Court did not abuse its 

discretion in dismissing Robinson’s motion to recuse. As noted by the District Court, 

there were no matters pending at the time Robinson filed his motion to recuse. 

Moreover, Robinson has put forth no allegations that would support recusal. Under 28 

U.S.C. § 455, a judge should recuse if his impartiality might reasonably be questioned or 

he has a personal bias. Under § 144, a judge should recuse if he has a personal bias or 

prejudice against the litigant. Robinson’s displeasure with the District Court’s legal 

rulings is not an adequate basis for recusal. Securacomm Consulting, Inc. v. Securacom 

Inc., 224 F.3d 273, 278 (3d Cir. 2000). “[O]pinions formed by the judge on the basis of 

facts introduced or events occurring in the course of the current proceedings, or of prior 

proceedings, do not constitute a basis for a bias or partiality motion unless they display a 

deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment impossible.” Liteky 

v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994). Furthermore, we note that even if the District 
3

Court Judge had recused himself in response to Robinson’s motion, the recusal would not 

invalidate Robinson’s conviction and sentence or provide Robinson with an avenue to 

challenge them.

Summary action is appropriate if there is no substantial question presented in the 

appeal. See Third Circuit LAR 27.4. For essentially the reasons set forth by the District 

Court, we will summarily affirm the District Court’s November 28, 2011, order. See

Third Circuit I.O.P. 10.6.
Channel M. EDWARDS, DOC #S23922, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1486

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Dennis HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2708

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christopher Lynn CORMIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5787

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
R.D.B. v. STATE

CR-15-1479

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99












Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm









Oncologix Tech, Inc.


Grand Rapids, Michigan




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration Statement as filed on May 29, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Oncologix Tech, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2010.




We also consent to the reference to us under the caption “Experts” in the aforementioned Registration Statement.














/s/  CHISHOLM, BIERWOLF, NILSON & MORRILL, LLC






Bountiful, Utah




November 19c, 2010
Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals

November 12, 2009

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On November 12, 2009, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) participated in a meeting to update interested members from the National Tribal 

Air Association (NTAA) on the status of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and 

Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the: 

• Proposed schedule for finalizing the rule
Sitki OZKARDES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2140

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1
                             Selected Information
                              Relating to Series
                    1994-1 Certificates, Series 1995-1
                       Certificates, Series 1996-1
                Certificates, Series 1996-2 Certificates, and
                       Series 1997-1 Certificates from
                     January 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999
                 --------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                Series 1994-1    Series 1995-1     Series 1996-1   Series 1996-2    Series 1997-1
                Floating Rate    6.50% Auto        5.50% Auto      Floating Rate    Floating Rate
                Loan Asset       Loan Asset        Loan Asset      Loan Asset       Loan Asset
                Backed           Backed            Backed          Backed           Backed
                Certificates     Certificates      Certificates    Certificates     Certificates
                ------------     -------------     -------------   ------------     ------------



<S>             <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>


Interest
Paid            $ 26,248,656.12   $ 30,381,944.48 $ 20,675,000.00  $ 25,546,340.79   $ 19,424,718.76

Servicing
Fee Paid        $  4,999,999.98   $  4,999,999.98 $  4,000,000.02  $  4,800,000.00   $  3,750,000.00










</TABLE>

                                             -11-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-179-2021]

      ( print page 6137)    
On November 19, 2021, the Acting Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, grantee of FTZ 49, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 49, on behalf of Valbruna Stainless, Inc., in Pompton Lakes, New Jersey.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (86 FR 67435, November 26, 2021). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 49X was approved on January 31, 2022, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 49's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: January 31, 2022.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-02261 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P