Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices 6485 

1See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Italy: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 41953 (August 4, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results). 

2Nucor Corporation. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of 2019–2020 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated November 30, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019– 

2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel CutTo-Length Plate from Italy,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, these results (Issues 

and Decision Memorandum). 

5For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

6See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian 

Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 

(May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal 

from the Russian Federation: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

56989 (September 17, 2010). 

7See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 28, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. The POSCO Single Entity 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Collapsing Taechang and 

Winsteel with POSCO 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02308 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–834] 

Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate From Italy: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that producers 

and/or exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

May 1, 2019, through April 30, 2020. 

Additionally, Commerce determines 

that a company for which we initiated 

a review had no shipments during the 

POR. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alice Maldonado or David Crespo, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4682 or (202) 482–3693, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This review covers ten producers and/ 

or exporters of the subject merchandise. 

Commerce selected two companies, 

NLMK Verona SpA (NVR) and Officine 

Tecnosider s.r.l. (OTS), for individual 

examination. The producers and/or 

exporters not selected for individual 

examination are listed in the ‘‘Final 

Results of the Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

On August 4, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 In 

September 2021, certain of the 

petitioners 2 and NVR submitted case 

and rebuttal briefs. On November 30, 

2021, we extended the deadline for the 

final results by 57 days, until January 

28, 2022.3 For a description of the 

events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.4

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

certain carbon and alloy steel hot-rolled 

or forged flat plate products not in coils, 

whether or not painted, varnished, or 

coated with plastics or other nonmetallic substances from Italy. Products 

subject to the order are currently 

classified in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

under item numbers: 7208.40.3030, 

7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 

7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 

7208.52.0000, 7211.13.0000, 

7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 

7225.40.1110, 7225.40.1180, 

7225.40.3005, 7225.40.3050, 

7226.20.0000, and 7226.91.5000. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to this scope is 

dispositive.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in the appendix 

to this notice and addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Determination of No Shipments 

As noted in the Preliminary Results, 

we received a no-shipment claim from 

one company involved in this 

administrative review, Lyman Steel 

Company (Lyman). In the Preliminary 

Results, we preliminarily determined 

that Lyman had no reviewable 

transactions during the POR. We 

received no comments from interested 

parties with respect to this claim. 

Therefore, because the record indicates 

that this company did not export subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR, we continue to find that 

Lyman had no reviewable transactions 

during the POR. Accordingly, consistent 

with Commerce’s practice, we intend to 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to liquidate any 

existing entries of merchandise 

produced by Lyman, but exported by 

other parties, at the rate for the 

intermediate reseller, if available, or at 

the all-others rate.6

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made changes to the 

preliminary weighted-average margin 

calculations for OTS, NVR, and those 

companies not selected for individual 

review.7

Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
6486 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices 

8See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 9This rate was calculated as discussed in the 

Section, ‘‘Rate for Non-Selected Respondents,’’ 

above. 

10See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

rate to be applied to companies not 

selected for individual examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted-average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

In this review, we have calculated a 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the non-selected companies by using the 

weighted-average calculated rates of the 

mandatory respondents, NVR and OTS, 

which are not zero, de minimis, or 

determined entirely on the basis of facts 

available.8 For these final results, we 

have calculated a weighted-average 

dumping margin for OTS that is zero. 

Accordingly, we have assigned to the 

companies not individually examined 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

calculated for NVR. 

Final Results of the Review 

We are assigning the following 

weighted-average dumping margins to 

the firms listed below for the period 

May 1, 2019, through April 30, 2020: 

Exporters/producers 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

NLMK Verona SpA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1.57 

Officine Tecnosider s.r.l ............................................................................................................................................................... 0.00 

Rate Applicable to the Following Non-Selected Companies: 

Arvedi Tubi Acciaio ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1.57 

C.M.T. Construzioni Meccaniche di Taglione Emilio & C. S.a.s ................................................................................................. 1.57 

MAM s.r.1 .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1.57 

O.ME.P SpA ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1.57 

Ofar SpA ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1.57 

Sesa SpA ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1.57 

Tim-Cop Doo Temerin ................................................................................................................................................................. 1.57 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these final results of review to 

parties in this review within five days 

after public announcement of the final 

results or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Where the respondent did not report 

entered value or reported amounts 

based on estimated data, we calculated 

the entered value in order to calculate 

the assessment rate. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

cash deposit rate calculated for NVR.9

The final results of this review shall be 

the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.10

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by companies included in these final 

results of review for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. As indicated above, for 

Lyman, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate any existing entries of 

merchandise produced by Lyman, but 

exported by other parties, at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be that 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit will continue to be the 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices 6487 

11See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Austria, Belgium, France, the 

Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for 

France, the Federal Republic of Germany, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan, and Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 82 FR 24096, 24098 (May 25, 2017). 

1See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recent 

segment for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 6.08 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.11 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is being issued in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 28, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Margin Calculations 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: NVR’s Major Input Rule 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust NVR’s Total Cost of 

Manufacturing (TOTCOM) Calculation 

for Unsupported Adjustments in Its 

Overall Reconciliation 

Comment 3: NVR’s General and 

Administrative (G&A) Expense 

Calculation 

Comment 4: NVR’s Interest Income 

Calculation 

Comment 5: Whether Section 232 Duties 

Should be Deducted From U.S. Price 

Comment 6: Section 232 Duties Calculation 

for NVR 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02280 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) has received requests to 

conduct administrative reviews of 

various antidumping duty (AD) and 

countervailing duty (CVD) orders with 

December anniversary dates. In 

accordance with Commerce’s 

regulations, we are initiating those 

administrative reviews. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations, 

Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 

(202) 482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various AD and CVD orders and 

findings with December anniversary 

dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

Commerce discussed below refer to the 

number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting time. 

Notice of No Sales 

If a producer or exporter named in 

this notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the period of 

review (POR), it must notify Commerce 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. All 

submissions must be filed electronically 

at https://access.trade.gov, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.1 Such 

submissions are subject to verification, 

in accordance with section 782(i) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served 

on every party on Commerce’s service 

list. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event Commerce limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, Commerce 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the 

POR. We intend to place the CBP data 

on the record within five days of 

publication of the initiation notice and 

to make our decision regarding 

respondent selection within 35 days of 

publication of the initiation Federal 

Register notice. Comments regarding the 

CBP data and respondent selection 

should be submitted within seven days 

after the placement of the CBP data on 

the record of this review. Parties 

wishing to submit rebuttal comments 

should submit those comments within 

five days after the deadline for the 

initial comments. 

In the event Commerce decides it is 

necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act, the 

following guidelines regarding 

collapsing of companies for purposes of 

respondent selection will apply. In 

general, Commerce has found that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (e.g., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1