alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued June 20, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00781-CV

———————————

IN RE S.A.R.S. TRUCKING LTD. AND FELIPE RODRIGUEZ, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, S.A.R.S. Trucking Ltd. and Felipe Rodriguez, filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s August 15, 2023 order denying their

“Motion for Entry of New Docket Control Order, or in the Alternative, Motion for 

Leave to Late Designate Experts.”

1

 Relators requested that this Court “grant them 

1 The underlying case is Janelle Solis, Individually, and on Behalf of Her Minor 

Children, I.C., A.S., S.G., and S.G. v. S.A.R.S. Trucking Ltd. and Felipe Rodriguez, 

Case No. 2020-23445, in the 164th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable C. Elliot Thornton presiding.
2

mandamus relief [and] set[] aside [the trial court’s] denial of their Motion for Leave 

to Late Designate” an expert witness, and to “requir[e] that such leave be granted.”

In connection with their petition for writ of mandamus, relators filed a 

“Motion for Temporary Relief: Stay of Trial Proceedings,” requesting that the Court 

stay trial in the underlying lawsuit pending this Court’s resolution of the mandamus 

petition. On March 13, 2024, the Court granted the temporary relief requested by 

relators, staying the underlying lawsuit. 

Our review of the mandamus petition reflects that relators have failed to 

establish that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’

petition for writ of mandamus and lift the stay imposed by our March 13, 2024 order. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00025-CR

No. 10-15-00026-CR

No. 10-15-00047-CR

No. 10-15-00048-CR

No. 10-15-00049-CR

No. 10-15-00050-CR

No. 10-15-00051-CR

No. 10-15-00052-CR

No. 10-15-00053-CR

No. 10-15-00054-CR

CARLOS ALVAREZ PEREZ III,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 220th District Court

Hamilton County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. CR07960, CR07970, CR07961, CR07971, CR07972, 

CR07973, CR07974, CR07975, CR07976 and CR07977

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Perez v. State Page 2

In ten cause numbers, appellant, Carlos Alvarez Perez III, filed pro se 

interlocutory notices of appeal of the trial court’s denial of his motions for bond 

reduction.1 The Clerk of the Court notified appellant that these cases are subject to 

dismissal for want of jurisdiction and that the Court might dismiss the appeals unless 

appellant showed grounds for continuing them. Appellant did not respond to the 

Clerk’s letter.

This Court lacks jurisdiction over a trial court’s denial of a motion for bond 

reduction when the appeal is not from the trial court’s denial of a pre-trial application 

for writ of habeas corpus in which the appellant sought bond reduction.2 See Benford v. 

State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 409 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); see also Sanchez v. State, 340 

S.W.3d 848, 849 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2011, no pet.). Accordingly, these appeals are 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction.3

 

1 The ten cause numbers correspond with the following appellate cause numbers: 10-15-00025-

CR, 10-15-00027-CR, and 10-15-00047-CR through 10-15-00054-CR.

2 We also note that appellant is still represented by counsel, and the record does not demonstrate 

that appellant’s trial counsel has filed a motion to withdraw in the trial court or that he has been removed 

as appellant’s attorney in some other fashion. Moreover, appellant’s pro se notices of appeal do not 

appear to have been served on his trial counsel. The Court of Criminal Appeals has held that a party 

represented by counsel is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Ex parte Bohannan, 350 S.W.3d 116, n.1 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (noting that the court disregarded and took no action on applicant’s pro se 

submissions because he was represented by counsel); see also Ex parte Taylor, 36 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2001).

3 A motion for rehearing may be filed within fifteen days after the judgment or order of this 

Court is rendered. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court 

reviewed by the Court of Criminal Appeals, a petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Court 

of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after either the day of the court of appeals’ judgment was 

rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. See id. at 

R. 68.2(a).
Perez v. State Page 3

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeals dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 19, 2015

Do not publish

[CRPM]
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William C. Straub, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of Mariner Health Care, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:



|(3) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(4) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                         

Date: November 14, 2002

|                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ William C. Straub

William C. Straub
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
Dennis Jerome CALLOWAY, DOC #144946, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D17-3096

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated February 16, 2005, appearing in the Annual Report on page F-2 of Form 10-KSB of Odyssey Marine Exploration,
Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004, in the Companys Registration Statements on Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-50325 and 333-76038 regarding the 1997 Stock Option Plan and SEC File No. 333-50343 regarding the Consulting
Agreement; and in the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-42824.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Ferlita, Walsh & Gonzalez, P.A.
|Ferlita, Walsh & Gonzalez, P.A.    
|3302 Azeele Street                 
|Tampa, Florida 33609               
|                                   
|March 23, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        302,094
<SECURITIES>                                        0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  75,171 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              578,455
<PP&E>                                      1,670,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                311,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             18,506,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         972,025
<BONDS>                                       654,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                        27
<COMMON>                                      178,867
<OTHER-SE>                                 46,218,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               18,506,654
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,712,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           12,508,796 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (14,221,246)             
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1,712,450)          
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                             (14,221,246)            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<FN>

<F1>Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line item on the Balance
Sheet or Statement of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
James BONNER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Maria Teresa BONNER, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1700

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 06, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# Europos Sąjungos C 134A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 134A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 57 tomas2014m. gegužės 3d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 134A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

57 tomas2014m. gegužės 3d.

---

| Pranešimo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| 2014/C 134A/01 | Pranešimo apie viešąjį konkursą — EPSO/AD/278/14 – Administratoriai (AD 7) šių sričių administratoriai: 1. Skaitmeninė ekspertizė 2. Operatyvinė analizė klaidų ištaisymas — (Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 88 A, 2014 m. kovo 27 d.) | 1 |

Pranešimo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

2014/C 134A/01

Pranešimo apie viešąjį konkursą — EPSO/AD/278/14 – Administratoriai (AD 7) šių sričių administratoriai: 1. Skaitmeninė ekspertizė 2. Operatyvinė analizė klaidų ištaisymas — (Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 88 A, 2014 m. kovo 27 d.)

(Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 88 A, 2014 m. kovo 27 d.)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 134A/02 | Oficialiojo leidinio C A Serijos Konkursai apžvalga | 2 |

2014/C 134A/02

Oficialiojo leidinio C A Serijos Konkursai apžvalga

2

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 3.5.2014 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2014

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 134/1

---

Pranešimo apie viešąjį konkursą

EPSO/AD/278/14 – ADMINISTRATORIAI (AD 7)

šių sričių administratoriai:

| 1. | SKAITMENINĖ EKSPERTIZĖ |
| --- | --- |

1.

SKAITMENINĖ EKSPERTIZĖ

| 2. | OPERATYVINĖ ANALIZĖ |
| --- | --- |

2.

OPERATYVINĖ ANALIZĖ

klaidų ištaisymas

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 88 A, 2014 m. kovo 27 d.
  )

2014/C 134 A/01

7 puslapis, VIII antraštinė dalis, 1 punktas:

yra:

„Galutinis terminas (iki kurio reikia užpildyti ir patvirtinti paraišką): 2014 m. balandžio 29 d. 12.00 val. (vidurdienis) Briuselio laiku.“,

turi būti:

„Galutinis terminas (iki kurio reikia užpildyti ir patvirtinti paraišką): 2014 m. gegužės 6 d. 12.00 val. (vidurdienis) Briuselio laiku.“

---

3.5.2014

| 3.5.2014 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 134/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 134/2

---

OFICIALIOJO LEIDINIO C A SERIJOS KONKURSAI APŽVALGA

2014/C 134 A/02

Toliau pateikiamas šiais metais išleistų C A serijos leidinių sąrašas.

Jei nenurodyta kitaip, Oficialieji leidiniai yra išleisti visomis kalbomis.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

---
EX PARTE Antonio Deon REED

CR-16-0196

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
XOX CORPORATION


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Form 10-KSB  Exhibit 11.1 Computation of Net Loss per share


<S>                                                       <C>             <C>      
PRIMARY NET LOSS PER SHARE:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding              1,830,434       1,155,065
  Common shares outstanding oursuant to Staff
    Accounting Bulletin No. 83                               69,882         167,716
                                                        -----------     -----------
                                                          1,900,316         167,716
                                                        ===========     ===========

Net loss                                                ($1,667,399)    ($1,600,945)
                                                        ===========     ===========

Nel loss per share                                           ($0.88)         ($1.21)
                                                        ===========     ===========

FULLY DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE:
  Primary shares outstanding                              1,900,316         1322781
  Preferred stock on an as if converted basis               160,000          160000
                                                        -----------     -----------
                                                          2,060,316         1482781
                                                        ===========     ===========

Net loss                                                ($1,667,399)    ($1,600,945)
                                                        ===========     ===========

Net loss per share                                           ($0.81)         ($1.08)
                                                        ===========     ===========

SUPPLEMENTARY NET LOSS PER SHARE:
  Fully diluted shares outstanding                        2,060,316
  Common shares assumed issued for repayment of debt         54,571
                                                        -----------
                                                          2,114,887
                                                        ===========

Net loss                                                ($1,667,399)
interest related to debt repayed                             28,650
                                                        -----------
                                                        ($1,638,749)
                                                        ===========

Net loss per share                                           ($0.77)
                                                        ===========
</TABLE>
exh10_63.htm


    Exhibit
10.63

    


    AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO MAXXAM INC.

    REVISED
CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN OF 1988

    


    WHEREAS,
MAXXAM Inc. (the “Company”)
sponsors the MAXXAM Inc. Revised Capital Accumulation Plan of 1988 (As Amended
and Restated December 2007) (the “Plan”),
which is subject to section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (together with applicable Treasury regulations and other guidance of
general application thereunder, including Notices 2005-1 and 2007-86, “409A”);
and

    


    WHEREAS,
the Company deems it necessary to amend the Plan to conform to
409A;

    


    NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the following particulars, effective
December 31, 2008:

     

    
      1.      Clause
2.3(b)(iii) is hereby amended to read as follows:

      


      “Notwithstanding
clauses (i) and (ii) above, amounts creditable under Section 2.3(a) for the
first calendar year in which an employee becomes a participant shall be
allocated in accordance with the employee’s direction made prior to the date he
first becomes a participant;”

       

      
        
          	
                  2.

                	
                  The
      words “if such termination was for reasons other than Disability (or
      death)” are hereby deleted from the first sentence of clause 3.3(a)(i);
      and the words “unless the participant’s Termination of Employment was on
      account of Disability or death” are hereby deleted from the third sentence
      of clause 3.3(a)(ii).

                


        

         

      

      EXECUTED
this 30th day of December 2008, to be effective as indicated above.

       

    

    
      	 
      	 
      	
              MAXXAM
      INC.

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              By:

            	
              /s/
      M. Emily Madison

            
	 
      	 
      	
              M.
      Emily Madison

            
	 
      	 
      	
              Vice
      President, Finance

            


    

    


    



    
      
        
          MI Cap
Accum Plan (Dec 2008 amend’t).final.BLB.doc
Octavio H. SOTO-TORO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4751

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 02, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141 (c)(5)(A).

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVAand SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
24.5

|                 |  
|---------------- | -
|STATE OF TEXAS   | §
|COUNTY OF DALLAS | §

POWER
OF ATTORNEY

Know all men by these presents, that
I, WILLIAM M. SAMS, a Director of AMERICAS CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do
constitute and appoint WILLIAM H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to
sign, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for AMERICAS CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30,
2008 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and
all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes as said
attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

In
witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of July,
2008.

| |                     | 
| | ------------------- | 
| | /s/ William M. Sams
| |                     | 
| | WILLIAM M. SAMS    

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Before
me this 3rd day of July, 2008, came WILLIAM M. SAMS, personally known to me,
who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney
and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Mary Sellner Thomas
|                        | 
|NOTARY PUBLIC          

70

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 118 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 118

  To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a report on 
        cyber vulnerability disclosures, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a report on 
        cyber vulnerability disclosures, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cyber Vulnerability Disclosure 
Reporting Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON CYBER VULNERABILITIES.

    (a) Report.--Not later than 240 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit 
to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 
Senate a report that contains a description of the policies and 
procedures developed for coordinating cyber vulnerability disclosures, 
in accordance with section 2209(m) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(6 U.S.C. 659(m)). To the extent possible, such report shall include an 
annex with information on instances in which such policies and 
procedures were used to disclose cyber vulnerabilities in the year 
prior to the date such report is required and, where available, 
information on the degree to which such information was acted upon by 
industry and other stakeholders. Such report may also contain a 
description of how the Secretary is working with other Federal entities 
and critical infrastructure owners and operators to prevent, detect, 
and mitigate cyber vulnerabilities.
    (b) Form.--The report required under subsection (b) shall be 
submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex.
                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Iron Bow Technologies , LLC ) ) Under Contract No. W91QUZ-07-D-0010 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59181

James C. Fontana, Esq. David B. Dempsey, Esq.

Dempsey Fontana, PLLC Reston, VA Raymond M. Saunders , Esq.

Army Chief Trial Attorney MAJ James P. Leary, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 12 August 2015

Administraf e Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59181, Appeal of Iron Bow Technologies, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals