7044 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects with practical, 

appropriate, and legally permissible 

methods under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

• Is not approved to apply on any 

Indian reservation land or in any other 

area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

• Is subject to the Congressional 

Review Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., 

and the EPA will submit a rule report 

to each House of the Congress and to the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States. The CRA allows the issuing 

agency to make a rule effective sooner 

than otherwise provided by the CRA if 

the agency makes a good cause finding 

that notice and comment rulemaking 

procedures are impracticable, 

unnecessary or contrary to the public 

interest (5 U.S.C. 808(2)). The EPA has 

made a good cause finding for this rule 

as discussed in section II of this 

preamble, including the basis for that 

finding. 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by April 11, 2022. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the EPA 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this rule for the 

purpose of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see CAA 

section 307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of 

nitrogen, Ozone, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: February 1, 2022. 

Martha Guzman Aceves, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02463 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 64 

[CG Docket No. 17–59; FCC 20–187; FCC 

21–126; FR ID 70178] 

Advanced Methods To Target and 

Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls, Fourth 

Report and Order and Order on 

Reconsideration 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission or FCC) announces that 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) has approved the public 

information collections associated with 

the Advanced Methods to Target and 

Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls, Fourth 

Report and Order and Order on 

Reconsideration. This document is 

consistent with the Fourth Report and 

Order and Order on Reconsideration 

which stated that the Commission 

would publish a document in the 

Federal Register announcing OMB 

approval and the effective date of the 

information collection requirements. 

DATES: The additions of § 64.1200(k)(10) 

and (n)(2), published at 86 FR 17726, 

April 6, 2021, and revision of 

§ 64.1200(k)(10), published at 86 FR 

74373, December 30, 2021, are effective 

March 10, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jerusha Burnett, Jerusha.Burnett@

fcc.gov or (202) 418–0526, of the 

Consumer and Governmental Affairs 

Bureau, Consumer Policy Division. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document announces that, on October 4, 

2021, OMB approved the information 

collection requirements contained in the 

Commission’s Advanced Methods to 

Target and Eliminate Unlawful 

Robocalls Fourth Report and Order, FCC 

20–187, published at 86 FR 17726, April 

6, 2021, and Order on Reconsideration, 

FCC 21–126, published at 86 FR 74373, 

December 30, 2021. The OMB Control 

Numbers are 3060–1292. The 

Commission publishes this document as 

an announcement of the effective date of 

the information collection requirements. 

Synopsis 

As required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507), 

the FCC is notifying the public that it 

received OMB approval for the 

information collection requirements 

contained in the Commission’s rules on 

October 4, 2021 and the non-substantive 

changes in the Order on 

Reconsideration were approved by OMB 

on January 20, 2022. 

No person shall be subject to any 

penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act that does not 

display a current, valid OMB control 

number which is 3060–1292. 

The foregoing notification is required 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, Public Law 104–13, October 1, 

1995, and 44 U.S.C. 3507. 

The total annual reporting burdens 

and costs for the respondents are as 

follows: 

OMB Control No.: 3060–1292. 

OMB Approval Date: October 4, 2021. 

OMB Expiration Date: October 31, 

2024. 

Title: Advanced Methods to Target 

and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls, 

Fourth Report and Order, CG Docket No. 

17–59, FCC 20–187. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents: 6,493 

respondents and 582,434 annual 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: .25 to 

40 hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement, On-going 

reporting requirement and Third-party 

Disclosure requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for these collections are 

contained in 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 201, 202, 

217, 227, 251(e), 303(r) and 403. 

Total Annual Burden: 199,412 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: No cost. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

adopted a new information collection 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 7045 

associated with the Advanced Methods 

to Target and Eliminate Unlawful 

Robocalls Fourth Report and Order 

(‘‘Call Blocking Fourth Report and 

Order’’), FCC 20–187. In 2019, Congress 

passed the Pallone-Thune Telephone 

Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement 

and Deterrence (TRACED) Act. In 

addition to directing the Commission to 

mandate adoption of caller ID 

authentication technology and 

encourage voice service providers to 

block calls by establishing safe harbors, 

the TRACED Act directs the 

Commission to ensure that both 

consumers and callers are provided 

with transparency and effective redress 

when calls are blocked in error. In the 

Call Blocking Fourth Report and Order, 

the Commission adopted a notification 

requirement and a blocked calls list 

requirement to better protect consumers 

from unwanted and illegal robocalls and 

implement the TRACED Act. While 

most of the requirements the 

Commission adopted in the Call 

Blocking Fourth Report and Order did 

not include an information collection, 

two of the requirements required 

approval prior to implementation. 

First, 47 CFR 64.1200(n)(2) establishes 

an affirmative obligation that voice 

service providers effectively mitigate 

illegal traffic when notified of such 

traffic by the Commission’s Enforcement 

Bureau. The rule requires that voice 

service providers receiving notice from 

the Commission report back with 

specific information about their 

investigation and response to such 

investigation. This requirement gives 

the Commission an important tool in the 

fight to stop illegal calls. 

Second, 47 CFR 64.1200(k)(10), in 

order to enhance transparency for 

consumers, requires that any 

terminating voice service provider that 

blocks calls on an opt-in or opt-out basis 

must provide, on the request of the 

subscriber to a particular number, a list 

of all calls intended for that number that 

the voice service provider or its 

designee has blocked. 

Subsequent to OMB approval of this 

information collection, the Commission 

released an Order on Reconsideration, 

‘‘Advanced Methods to Target and 

Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls—Petition 

for Reconsideration and Request for 

Clarification of USTelecom—The 

Broadband Association,’’ CG Docket No. 

17–59, FCC 21–126, 86 FR 74373, 

December 30, 2021. Among other things, 

this Order on Reconsideration clarified 

aspects of 47 CFR 64.1200(k)(10). In 

doing so, the Commission added 

clarifying language to the existing rule. 

OMB approved the Commission’s nonsubstantive change request for this 

change on January 20, 2022. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Katura Jackson, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02485 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 22–95; FRS 70458] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Various 

Locations 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This document amends the 

FM Table of Allotments, of the 

Commission’s rules, by removing 

certain vacant FM allotment channels 

that were auctioned through our FM 

competitive bidding process or 

undergone FM noncommercial filing 

window, and are no longer considered 

vacant FM allotments. The FM 

allotments are currently authorized 

licensed stations. FM assignments for 

authorized stations and reserved 

facilities will be reflected solely in 

Media Bureau’s Licensing Management 

System (LMS). These FM allotment 

channels have previously undergone 

notice and comment rulemaking. This 

action constitutes an editorial change in 

the FM Table of Allotments. Therefore, 

we find for good cause that further 

notice and comment are unnecessary. 

DATES: Effective February 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Order, 

adopted January 28, 2022 and released 

January 28, 2022. The full text of this 

Commission decision is available online 

at https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. This 

document does not contain information 

collection requirements subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. The Commission 

will not send a copy of the Order in a 

report to be sent to Congress and the 

Government Accountability Office 

pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because 

the Order is a ministerial action. 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Thomas Horan, 

Chief of Staff, Media Bureau. 

Final Rules 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as 

follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, 

307, 309, 310, 334, 336 and 339. 

■ 2. In § 73.202, amend table 1 to 

paragraph (b) as follows: 

■ a. Remove the entry for ‘‘Waverly’’ 

under Alabama; 

■ b. Remove the entries for ‘‘Bagdad,’’ 

‘‘Peach Springs,’’ ‘‘Quartzsite,’’ ‘‘Rough 

Rock,’’ and ‘‘Somerton’’ under Arizona; 

■ c. Remove the entries for ‘‘Dermott’’ 

and ‘‘Heber Springs’’ under Arkansas; 

■ d. Remove the entries for ‘‘Barstow,’’ 

‘‘Hemet,’’ ‘‘Lake Isabella,’’ ‘‘Shasta 

Lake,’’ ‘‘Sutter Creek,’’ ‘‘Westley,’’ and 

‘‘Wofford Heights’’ under California; 

■ e. Remove the entries for ‘‘Akron’’ and 

‘‘Dove Creek’’ under Colorado; 

■ f. Remove the entries for ‘‘Maysville’’ 

and ‘‘Tignall’’ under Georgia; 

■ g. Remove the entry for ‘‘Kualapuu’’ 

under Hawaii; 

■ h. Remove the entry for ‘‘McCall’’ 

under Idaho; 

■ i. Remove the entry for ‘‘Terre Haute’’ 

under Indiana; 

■ j. Remove the entry for ‘‘Perryville’’ 

under Kentucky; 

■ k. Remove the entries for ‘‘Bastrop’’ 

and ‘‘Rosepine’’ under Louisiana; 

■ l. Remove the entry for ‘‘Newark’’ 

under Maryland; 

■ m. Remove the entries for ‘‘Baudette,’’ 

‘‘Grand Portage,’’ and ‘‘Red Lake’’ under 

Minnesota; 

■ n. Remove the entries for ‘‘Drew,’’ 

‘‘Mound Bayou,’’ and ‘‘Summit’’ under 

Mississippi; 

■ o. Remove the entries for ‘‘Columbia’’ 

and ‘‘Laurie’’ under Missouri; 

■ p. Remove the entries for ‘‘Bozeman’’ 

and ‘‘Lima’’ under Montana; 

■ q. Remove the entry for ‘‘Silver 

Springs’’ under Nevada; 

■ r. Remove the entries for 

‘‘Crownpoint,’’ ‘‘Roswell,’’ ‘‘Tohatchi,’’ 

and ‘‘Virden’’ under New Mexico; 

■ s. Remove the entries for ‘‘Amherst,’’ 

‘‘Livingston Manor,’’ ‘‘Rhinebeck,’’ and 

‘‘Rosendale’’ under New York; 

■ t. Remove the entry for ‘‘Dillsboro’’ 

under North Carolina; 

■ u. Remove the entries for 

‘‘Connerville,’’ ‘‘Hennessey,’’ and 

‘‘Waukomie’’ under Oklahoma; 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES