alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles Calello, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Telstar, Inc.
(the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
    information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
    particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
    prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of
    this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
    disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
    Evaluation Date;

5. We have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
    which could adversely affect the Registrant's  ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's
    auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls;
    and

6. We have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: October 29, 2007

By:  /s/ Charles Calello
     -------------------------------------
     Charles Calello -- President, Chief
     Executive Officer
John W. WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1569

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000800460
<NAME>                        California Micro Devices Corporation

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             762
<SECURITIES>                                     4,171
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (224)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,434<F1>
<PP&E>                                          27,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (15,480)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,644<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,328
<OTHER-SE>                                     (34,160)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,644<F3>
<SALES>                                         33,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,617
<CGS>                                           24,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,725<F4>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (219)<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,771)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)

<FN>
<F1>Includes - Other Assets $592K.
<F2>Includes - Restricted cash $2,900K; and Other long-term assets $770K.
<F3>Includes - Long-term  debt,  less current  maturities  $7,503K;  and Capital
    lease obligations less current maturities $919K.
<F4>Includes  -  Research  and  development  $3,685K;  Selling,   marketing  and
    administrative $7,300K;
<F5>Includes - Interest (income) $(295)K; and Other(income)/expense, net $76K.
</FN>



</TABLE>
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1170 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1 League in Irvine, California, as the 

‘‘Tuskegee Airman Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1170 RFS

1 SECTION 1. TUSKEGEE AIRMAN LIEUTENANT COLONEL 

2 ROBERT J. FRIEND MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 

3 BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1 League in Irvine, California, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tuskegee Airman 

7 Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office 

8 Building’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

12 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tuskegee Airman 

13 Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office 

14 Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 

2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
1 Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ngo, Dan (FAA) Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 4:11 PM
To: 'bgivens@3daerial.com' Subject: Request for Information - FAA-2014-0872

Dear Mr. Givens:

This letter is to inform you that we have rece ived and reviewed your request for an exemption under Section 333, Regulatory Docket No . FAA-2014-0872. Upon initial review , it was determined that more information was needed in order to move forward wit h your request. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your request.

・ Please clarify the weight and power source (e.g . battery/gas/propane-powered) for the aircraft
below. The list represents an initial assessment of the aircraft that the FAA is unable to move forward with. 1. 3D Blue 2. 3D Crimson 3. 3D Blue Rotor 4. Storm Drone AntiGravity

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov

. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by May 17, 2016. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

Regards,

Dan Ngo Office of Rulemaking, Aircra ft and Airport Rules Division Federal Aviation Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000799171
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM II - 10, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         16161
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15715
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36439
<PP&E>                                         1896106
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1387024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 545521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166682
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     378839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   545521
<SALES>                                        202405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202405
<CGS>                                          203962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               27107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (72)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   25478
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
October 16, 2015

Mr. Matthew Rude

Free Fun Omaha

16514 Yort Ave nue

Omaha, NE 68116

Dear Mr. Rude :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request , posted to the public docket on July 24, 2015, on behalf of

Free Fun Omaha filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3145 , but we are unable to process your

request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; th at is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any addi tional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Div ision

Enclosure s34
Cont inuing Abatement Order filed January 10, 2023

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00687

- CV

____________ DANIEL MANK , Appellant

V.
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No
. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1181128



### CONTINUING AB ATEMENT ORDER
On November 15 , 2022 , we abated this appeal for sixty da ys
. On January 5 , 202 3 , appellant filed an unopposed motion r equest ing t h at we continue the abatement of this appeal

. Th at motio n is GRANTED

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket until Feb ruary 14 , 202 3

. The appeal will be reinstated on this

c ourt’s active docket at that t ime, or when the parties file a motion to di smis s the
appe al o r other dis positive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by any party, or the court may reinstate the appeal o n its own motion.
PER CURIAM
P anel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




THE ST. JOE COMPANY

2009 SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN




2009 Company Goals



1. Maintain strong liquidity position consistent with the 2009 Business Plan.



2. Position WestBay to be available for commercial and industrial customers and partners.



3. Execute at least one agreement that will promote economic development in WestBay.



4. Create and implement a business plan for JOE’s current mitigation banks.



Mechanics for 2009 Short-Term Incentive Plan



1. The Compensation Committee approves the employees participating in the Plan and the target
awards for each participant in the first quarter of the year.



2. Each department and segment sets their team goals in support of the broader Company goals, which
departmental goals will be approved by the Executive Team.



3. Actual awards under the Plan will be based on (a) the Compensation Committee’s determination of
the achievement of approved Company goals, and (b) the mix between Company goals and management’s
evaluation of the achievement of departmental goals, as approved by the Compensation Committee,
which mix is described as follows:



• Executive Team awards will be 100% based upon achievement of the approved Company goals.



• Vice President level awards will have an achievement mix of 75% Company goals and 25%
departmental goals.



• Manager and Director level awards will have an achievement mix of 50% Company goals and 50%
departmental goals.



4. During the first quarter of 2010, the Compensation Committee will evaluate achievement of each
Company goal and the actual awards under the Plan. The Compensation Committee will have complete
discretion over the weighting and determination of relative achievement of the Company goals based
on the Compensation Committee’s qualitative assessment of Company performance for 2009.



5. For the portion of Plan awards based on departmental goals, management will assess the
achievement of the departmental goals and submit the projected bonus pool to the Compensation
Committee for approval.



6. The total range for the payout of Plan awards is between 0% and 100% of the target awards based
on the Compensation Committee’s determination of the percentage achievement of the Company goals
and its approval of the projected awards based on the departmental goals. The Compensation
Committee, in its discretion, may choose to pay more than 100% of the target awards for exceptional
Company performance.



7. Individual awards for Named Executive Officers (NEOs) will be individually approved by the
Committee.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with this quarterly report of Nanophase Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Joseph E. Cross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jess
A. Jankowski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Date: November 8, 2007



/s/ Joseph E. CrossJoseph E. CrossChief Executive Officer/s/ Jess A. JankowskiJess A. JankowskiChief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6144-6145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02288]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB776]

Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Pacific Council) Ad 
Hoc Groundfish Electronic Monitoring Policy Advisory Committee and 
Technical Advisory Committee (Committees) will hold two webinars, which 
are open to the public.

DATES: The online meetings will be held February 23 and March 30, 2022, 
from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., Pacific Time each day or until work for the day 
is completed.

ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held online. Specific meeting 
information, including directions on how to join the meetings and 
system requirements will be provided in the meeting announcements on 
the Pacific Council's website (see www.pcouncil.org). You may send an 
email to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt ([email protected]) or contact 
him at (503) 820-2412 for technical assistance.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE 
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Wiedoff, Staff Officer, Pacific 
Council; telephone: (503) 820-2424.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of these webinars is to discuss 
continued development of the West Coast Electronic Monitoring Program 
(EM Program). The Committees will begin scoping EM Program issues and 
conduct a workload planning process to identify future meetings and 
topics at the February 23rd webinar. The March 30th webinar will be a 
work session to

[[Page 6145]]

discuss meeting materials and topics that will be presented at the 
April 2022 Council meeting.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda 
may be discussed, those issues may not be the subject of formal action 
during this meeting. Action will be restricted to those issues 
specifically listed in this document and any issues arising after 
publication of this document that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the intent to 
take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt 
([email protected]; (503) 820-2412) at least 10 days prior to 
the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 31, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-02288 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
Order entered May 6, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00128

- CV

IN RE RYAN GALLAGHER
On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. DF

- 19

- 16008

ORDER After the Court instructed appellant to file an amended brief correcting noted deficiencies, appellant tendered a brief to this Court on May 4, 2020. The Court sent appellant notice that the brief was not filed beca use the appendix items were not text searchable or electronically bookmarked. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.4(h). Before the Court is appellant’s May 4, 2020 “Motion to Acknowledge Constitutional Challenge and Request for Waiver of TRAP Rule 9.4(h). ” We GRANT th e motion. We ORDER appellant’s brief tendered to this Court on May 4, 2020 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
#### General Motors Acceptance Corporation *v.*Jerry.

Opinion delivered May 12, 1930.

*775*Lvnwood Brickhouse*and *Ben D. Brickhouse,*for appellant.

*Powell, Smead <& Knox,*for appellee.

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is first insisted for reversal that the court erred in allowing testimony introduced tending to show that the plant installed was not fit for the service for which it was purchased, and intended to be used, and especially in permitting the hearsay testimony of the witness that an agent of the seller, long after the plant was sold appellee and installed and the contract assigned to appellant, told him in trying to sell him a like plant, “I guess the reason you don’t want a plant is because Mr. Jerry has a bum outfit. * * * We let Mr. Jerry have a second-hand outfit for the price we let him have it at.” The witness relating this conversation did not know the man with whom he talked, nor that he was an agent of the company which sold the light plant to appellee. Said he would not recognize him if he saw him again, and, certainly, he was not in the performance of any duty so far as the trans*776action ill controversy is concerned at the time of this statement. He did say that the man was riding in a car belonging to the Electric Refrigerating Company, and was talking- to him as a prospect for a sale of a light plant machine, which he had in the car at the time. He certainly had no authority to make an admission, as against the interest of said company about a sale, a transaction long since completed, out of the presence of his principal, and the testimony was nothing but hearsay at best, was inadmissible and highly prejudicial. The court erred in not excluding it. *Lovell*v. *Sneed,*79 Ark. 204, 95 S. W. 157; *Forrester*v. *Lockett,*149 Ark. 225, 231 S. W. 897; *Galloway*v. *Russ,*175 Ark. *665,*300 S. W. 390.

It is undisputed that the Delco light plant was purchased under the written contract, which contained no warranty; that the machinery for its construction and operation is a well known and definite article of commerce in general use for the construction of such plants, and there was therefore no warranty as to the fitness of it for the purpose for which it was purchased implied, and the court erred in modifying the said instructions, and in failing to give the one asked, telling the jury, under the terms of the contract, there was no warranty except against defects in the machine, etc. *Western Cabinet & Fix. Mfg. Co.*v. *Davis,*121 Ark. 370, 181 S. W. 273; *Kull*v. *Noble,*178 Ark. 496, 10 S. W. (2d) 902; *Crow*v. *Fones Bros. Hardware Co.,*176 Ark. 993, 4 S. W. (2d) 904.

For the errors designated, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial. It is so ordered.