alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 32 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 32

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2021

   Mr. Obernolte submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed 
total receipts for that fiscal year, unless two-thirds of the whole 
number of each House of Congress shall provide by law for a specific 
excess of outlays over receipts by a rollcall vote.
    ``Section 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President shall 
transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the United States 
Government for that fiscal year in which total outlays do not exceed 
total receipts.
    ``Section 3. The Congress shall enforce and implement this article 
by appropriate legislation, which may rely on estimates of outlays and 
receipts.
    ``Section 4. Total receipts shall include all receipts of the 
United States Government except those derived from borrowing. Total 
outlays shall include all outlays of the United States Government 
except for those for repayment of debt principal.
    ``Section 5. This article shall take effect beginning with the 
fifth fiscal year beginning after its ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 24,
2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. Brown
 /s/ Phillip J. Smith
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7418** 

TOR R ICK JOHNTRELLE RODGERS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
WASTE INDUSTRIES INCORPORATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 4:12

- cv - 00294

- FL )

Submitted : January 22, 2014 Decided: January 31, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Torrick Johntrelle Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Tobias Samuel Hampson, Paul J. Puryear, Jr., WYRICK, ROBBINS, YATES & PONTON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinion s are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Torrick Johntrelle Rodgers appeals the district

court ’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil complaint under Fed. R. Ci v. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Waste
Indus. Inc. , No. 4:12

- cv - 00294

- FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2013). We deny Rodgers’s motion to present newly discovered evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1


                           Immtech International, Inc.


      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                       pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

     In connection with the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Immtech International, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, T. Stephen Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Gary C. Parks, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
     quarter ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects,
     the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                      /s/ T. Stephen Thompson
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      T. Stephen Thompson
                                      President & Chief Executive Officer
                                      February 14, 2003



                                     /s/ Gary C. Parks
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Gary C. Parks
                                     Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial
                                       Officer (Principal Financial
                                       and Accounting Officer)
                                     February 14, 2003
Exhibit 24.5
 
 STATE OF TEXAS             §
 COUNTY OF DALLAS      §
 
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
 Know all men by these presents, that I, WILLIAM M. SAMS, a Director of AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 18th day of June, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ William M. Sams
 WILLIAM M. SAMS
 
 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 
 Before me this 18th day of June, 2010, came WILLIAM M. SAMS, personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.
 
 
 /s/ Mary Sellner Thomas
 NOTARY PUBLIC
LATIN DIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1160

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Itiba DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2537

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Chun Hua XUE, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72710.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Jisheng Li, Esq., Law Office of Jisheng Li, Honolulu, HI, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Honolulu, HI, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wernery, Esq., John D. Williams, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Chun Hua Xue, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

We review for substantial evidence and will reverse the BIA’s determination only if the petitioner shows that the evidence compels such a result. *Sangha v. INS,*103 F.3d 1482, 1487 (9th Cir.1997). Here, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that the mistreatment Xue suffered at the hands of the local Chinese police was on account of a land dispute with his neighbor, and not on account of Xue’s actual or imputed political opinion. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 *198S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 88 (1992) (holding that a petitioner must provide *“some*evidence” of the persecutors’ motives that would compel a reasonable factfinder to find that he was persecuted *“because of*... political opinion”).

By failing to qualify for asylum, Xue necessarily fails to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir.2003). Finally, because Xue did not present the CAT claim in his appeal to the BIA, it cannot be addressed in this court. *See, e.g., Khourassany v. INS,*208 F.3d 1096, 1099 (9th Cir.2000).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1
------------

             Certification Pursuant to 18 USC Sec. 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Epicus Communications Group, Inc.
(Company) on Form 10-KSB (Report) for the year ended May 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof.
I, Gerard Haryman, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
   of the Company.

/s/ Gerard Haryman
--------------------------------
Gerard Haryman
Chief Executive and
Chief Financial Officer


Dated: September 10, 2003
      --------------------
Charles Thomas HICKMAN v. STATE

CR-15-1256

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Justeene Blankenship, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of American Coal Corporation (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  March 23, 2004                                                 By: /s/ Justeene Blankenship

Justeene Blankenship

Chief Executive Officer





Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with this quarterly report of Nanophase Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Joseph E. Cross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jess A.
Jankowski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 7, 2008



/s/ Joseph E. CrossJoseph E. CrossChief Executive Officer/s/ Jess A. JankowskiJess A. JankowskiChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR SERIES II
EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,973,651
<SECURITIES>                                 3,819,666
<RECEIVABLES>                                  463,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      56,382,005
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,476,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,162,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,880,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,162,806
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,886,380
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,671,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               418,520
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,795,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,795,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,795,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 22-40703 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Fredy Sandoval-Chavez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:21-CR-239-1 

______________________________ 

Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fredy SandovalChavez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sandoval-Chavez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

May 3, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-40703 Document: 00516736548 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/03/2023
No. 22-40703 

2 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 

42.2. 

Case: 22-40703 Document: 00516736548 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/03/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          194399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2018792
<ALLOWANCES>                                     25000
<INVENTORY>                                     313298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3205257
<PP&E>                                          414155
<DEPRECIATION>                                  112005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6127662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2787285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2642
<OTHER-SE>                                     2115636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6127662
<SALES>                                       19414593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              19414593
<CGS>                                         15627867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 33455
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              404390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (945406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (945406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (945406)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       9,812,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,732,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (726,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     386,925,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,909,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             428,307,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    210,797,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       132,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 208,546,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               428,307,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            59,370,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,861,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               959,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,458,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,192,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         18,192,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                18,192,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.51<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51
<FN>
<F1> For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT C

Case: 2:18-cv-00961-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 08/28/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 24
Case: 2:18-cv-00961-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 08/28/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 25