### 37105 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations

Background

On May 21, 2013, the FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register establishing five RNAV routes in the Washington, DC area (78 FR 29615). Subsequent to publication, it was determined that the name of the MORTY, MD WP (which is common to the legal descriptions of RNAV routes T–291 and T–295) needs to be changed due to its proximity to a similar sounding and spelled fix, MORTO. Potential safety concerns were identified due to the possibility for confusion of the points in radio communications and onboard Flight Management System data entry. To resolve this concern, the FAA is changing the name ‘‘MORTY, MD’’ to ‘‘BAABS, MD’’ in the descriptions of T– 291 and T–295. This is a name change only. The latitude/longitude coordinates remain the same.

Area Navigation Routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA Order 7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 2012, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The RNAV routes listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

Correction to Final Rule

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the name ‘‘MORTY, MD WP’’ as published in the Federal Register on May 21, 2013 (78 FR 29615; FR Doc. 2013–11969) for RNAV routes T–291 and T–295, is corrected under the descriptions as follows:

Paragraph 6011—United States Area Navigation Routes

* * * * *

T–291 [Corrected]

On page 29616, line 36, Remove ‘‘MORTY, MD WP (Lat. 39 ° 19 ′51 ′′ N., long. 076 ° 24 ′41 ′′ W.)’’ and insert ‘‘BAABS, MD WP (Lat.

39 ° 19 ′51 ′′ N., long. 076 ° 24 ′41 ′′ W.)’’

T–295 [Corrected]

On page 29616. Line 40, Remove ‘‘MORTY, MD WP (Lat. 39 ° 19 ′51 ′′ N., long. 076 ° 24 ′41 ′′ W.)’’ and insert ‘‘BAABS, MD WP (Lat.

39 ° 19 ′51 ′′ N., long. 076 ° 24 ′41 ′′ W.)’’

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 13,

2013. Gary A. Norek, Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2013–14658 Filed 6–19–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2012–0971; Airspace Docket No. 12–ASO–31]** 

**RIN 2120–AA66**

**Modification of VOR Federal Airway V–537, GA** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This action modifies VHF omnidirectional range (VOR) Federal airway V–537 in Georgia due to the scheduled decommissioning of the Moultrie, GA, VOR/DME navigation aid which currently forms a point along the
route.

**DATES :**  Effective date 0901 UTC, August 22, 2013. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Paul Gallant, Airspace Policy and ATC Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  History

On October 15, 2012, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to modify V–537 in Georgia (77 FR 62468). Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on this proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.

Subsequently, a flight inspection was conducted to evaluate the usability of the proposed amended portion of V– 537. That flight inspection found a portion of the originally proposed route amendment to be unsatisfactory. Specifically, a radial from the Macon, GA, VORTAC that had been planned to form an intersection along the route between the Greenville, FL, VORTAC and the Macon, GA, VORTAC, did not pass the expanded service volume validation. After considering other alternatives, the FAA opted to propose terminating V–537 at the Greenville VORTAC and eliminate the segment between Greenville and Macon. The FAA issued a supplemental NPRM (SNPRM) (78 FR 21856, April 12, 2013) to reopen the comment period and solicit comments on the proposed further modification of V–537. No comments were received in response the SNPRM.

The Rule

The FAA is amending Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to modify VOR Federal airway V–537 due to the scheduled decommissioning of the Moultrie, GA, VOR/DME, which currently forms a point along the route. This action modifies V–537 by eliminating the route segments between the Greenville, FL, VORTAC and the Macon, GA, VORTAC. The modified V– 537 extends between Palm Beach, FL, and Greenville, FL.

VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order 7400.9W signed August 8, 2012 and effective September 15, 2012, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The VOR Federal airway listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority.

This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it modifies a VOR Federal airway to enhance the efficiency of the National Airspace System in the southeast United


### 37106 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations

1 See HUD rules published on December 1, 2003, at 68 FR 67316, and on September 13, 2005, at 70 FR 54200. States. Except for editorial changes, this rulemaking is the same as published in the SNPRM.

Environmental Review

The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p.389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the FAA Order 7400.9W, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 2012, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways

* * * * *

V–537 [Amended]

From Palm Beach, FL; INT Palm Beach

356 ° and Treasure, FL, 143 ° radials; Treasure;
INT Treasure 318 ° and Orlando. FL, 140 ° radials; INT Orlando 140 ° and Melbourne, FL

298 ° radials; INT Melbourne 298 ° and Ocala,
FL 145 ° radials; Ocala; Gators, FL; to Greenville, FL.

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 13,

2013. Gary A. Norek, Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2013–14660 Filed 6–19–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND**  **URBAN DEVELOPMENT**

**24 CFR Part 891**

**[Docket No. FR–5167–F–02]**

**RIN 2502–AI67**

**Streamlining Requirements Governing the Use of Funding for Supportive**  **Housing for the Elderly and Persons With Disabilities Programs** 

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Assistant Secretary of Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner, HUD.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This final rule amends HUD’s regulations governing the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly Program (Section 202) and the Section 811 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities Program (Section 811) to streamline the requirements applicable to Section 202 and Section 811 mixed-finance developments. This rule removes restrictions on the portions of developments not funded through capital advances, lifts barriers on participation in the development of the projects, and eliminates burdensome funding requirements. These changes are anticipated to attract private capital and the expertise of the private developer community to create attractive and affordable supportive housing developments for the elderly and for persons with disabilities.Through this rule, HUD also brings upto-date certain regulations governing all Section 202 and Section 811 developments, not solely mixed-finance developments. Overall, the changes made by this rule permit greater flexibility in the design of Section 202/ 811 units, and extend the duration of the availability of capital advance funds.

This final rule is part of a larger effort to reform the Section 202 and Section 811 programs, which will include implementation of the changes made to these programs by the Frank Melville Supportive Housing Investment Act of 2010 and the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly Act of 2010. A subsequent rule, which will focus on the statutory changes that require rulemaking for implementation, is expected to be published in 2013.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: July 22, 2013.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Aretha Williams, Office of Housing Assistance and Grant Administration, Office of Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 6136, Washington, DC 20410–8000; telephone number 202– 708–3000 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–
8339.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Executive Summary A. Purpose of the Regulatory Action

The regulatory amendments made by this rule are designed to provide greater flexibility in the design, construction, and management of Section 202/811 mixed-finance developments, to increase such development. The Section 202/811 mixed-finance program, established by interim and final rules issued in 2003 and 2005, 1 allows for the participation of the private developer community, leveraging their capital and expertise, to create attractive and affordable supportive housing developments for the elderly or persons with disabilities. In light of the current housing market, with limited private financing for the development of supportive housing, this rule streamlines requirements pertaining to mixed-finance developments to attract private capital for the development of mixed-finance housing. This rule allows for more flexibility in such areas as the drawdown of capital advance funds and noncapital advance funds and removes certain restrictions relating to noncapital advance funds. In addition, this rule would update certain regulations governing all Section 202 and Section 811 developments, which have not been updated since 2005, to conform to changes in law, policy, and practices that affect these developments. B. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Regulatory Action

This final rule updates the regulations governing mixed-finance developments for the Section 202 and Section 811 programs. This rule amends several definitions used in the mixed-finance development program, based on changes to these terms made by the Frank Melville Supportive Housing Investment Act of 2010 and the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly Act of 2010. These changes lessen restrictions with respect to who can be an owner. In addition, this rule removes the restriction on using HUD funds for certain amenities, exempts contracts for sale of land between owner and sponsor from conflict of interest provisions, clarifies what constitutes substantial rehabilitation, requires smoke detectors