Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 5479 

TABLE 3—REGISTRANTS REQUESTING VOLUNTARY CANCELLATION AND/OR AMENDMENTS—Continued 

EPA company 

No. Company name and address 

73049 ................. Valent Biosciences, LLC, 1910 Innovation Way, Suite 100, Libertyville, IL 60048–6316. 

74229 ................. Pro Tech USA, LLC, Agent Name: KRK Consulting, LLC, 5807 Churchill Way, Medina, OH 44256. 

80289 ................. Isagro S.P.A., D/B/A Isagro USA, Inc., Agent Name: Exigent Sciences, LLC, 370 S. Main St., Yuma, AZ 85364. 

87093 ................. LNouvel, Inc., 4657 Courtyard Trail, Plano, TX 75024. 

III. What is the Agency’s authority for 

taking this action? 

Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA (7 U.S.C. 

136d(f)(1)) provides that a registrant of 

a pesticide product may at any time 

request that any of its pesticide 

registrations be canceled or amended to 

terminate one or more uses. FIFRA 

further provides that, before acting on 

the request, EPA must publish a notice 

of receipt of any such request in the 

Federal Register. 

Section 6(f)(1)(B) of FIFRA (7 U.S.C. 

136d(f)(1)(B)) requires that before acting 

on a request for voluntary cancellation, 

EPA must provide a 30-day public 

comment period on the request for 

voluntary cancellation or use 

termination. In addition, FIFRA section 

6(f)(1)(C) (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1)(C)) 

requires that EPA provide a 180-day 

comment period on a request for 

voluntary cancellation or termination of 

any minor agricultural use before 

granting the request, unless: 

1. The registrants request a waiver of 

the comment period, or 

2. The EPA Administrator determines 

that continued use of the pesticide 

would pose an unreasonable adverse 

effect on the environment. 

The registrants have requested that 

EPA waive the 180-day comment 

period. Accordingly, EPA will provide a 

30-day comment period on the proposed 

requests. 

IV. Procedures for Withdrawal of 

Requests 

Registrants who choose to withdraw a 

request for product cancellation or use 

termination should submit the 

withdrawal in writing to the person 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. If the products have been 

subject to a previous cancellation 

action, the effective date of cancellation 

and all other provisions of any earlier 

cancellation action are controlling. 

V. Provisions for Disposition of Existing 

Stocks 

Existing stocks are those stocks of 

registered pesticide products that are 

currently in the United States and that 

were packaged, labeled, and released for 

shipment prior to the effective date of 

the action. If the requests for voluntary 

cancellation and amendments to 

terminate uses are granted, the Agency 

intends to publish the cancellation 

order in the Federal Register. 

In any order issued in response to 

these requests for cancellation of 

product registrations and for 

amendments to terminate uses, EPA 

proposes to include the following 

provisions for the treatment of any 

existing stocks of the products listed in 

Tables 1 and 2 of Unit II. 

For voluntary product cancellations, 

registrants will be permitted to sell and 

distribute existing stocks of voluntarily 

canceled products for 1 year after the 

effective date of the cancellation, which 

will be the date of publication of the 

cancellation order in the Federal 

Register. Thereafter, registrants will be 

prohibited from selling or distributing 

the products identified in Table 1 of 

Unit II, except for export consistent with 

FIFRA section 17 (7 U.S.C. 136o) or for 

proper disposal. 

Once EPA has approved product 

labels reflecting the requested 

amendments to terminate uses, 

registrants will be permitted to sell or 

distribute products under the previously 

approved labeling for a period of 18 

months after the date of Federal 

Register publication of the cancellation 

order, unless other restrictions have 

been imposed. Thereafter, registrants 

will be prohibited from selling or 

distributing the products whose labels 

include the terminated uses identified 

in Table 2 of Unit II, except for export 

consistent with FIFRA section 17 or for 

proper disposal. 

Persons other than the registrant may 

sell, distribute, or use existing stocks of 

canceled products and products whose 

labels include the terminated uses until 

supplies are exhausted, provided that 

such sale, distribution, or use is 

consistent with the terms of the 

previously approved labeling on, or that 

accompanied, the canceled products 

and terminated uses. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: January 21, 2022. 

Marietta Echeverria, 

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office 

of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01989 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–ORD–2020–0682; FRL–9518–01– 

ORD] 

Request for Nomination of Experts for 

the Biofuels and the Environment: 

Third Triennial Report to Congress 

Peer Review Panel 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; nomination of experts 

for peer review panel. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) is requesting 

nominations for an external expert 

panel to peer review EPA’s Biofuels and 

the Environment: Third Triennial 

Report to Congress (RtC3). The peer 

review will be conducted under the 

framework of EPA’s Scientific Integrity 

Policy (https://www.epa.gov/sites/ 

default/files/2014-02/documents/ 

scientific_integrity_policy_2012.pdf) 

and follow procedures established in 

EPA’s Peer Review Handbook 4th 

Edition, 2015 (EPA/100/B–15/001). EPA 

invites the public to nominate scientific 

experts to be considered as peer 

reviewers for this contractor-managed 

peer review. Nominations of peer 

review candidates will be accepted by 

EPA’s contractor, Eastern Research 

Group, Inc. (ERG). Relevant expertise 

includes economics, engineering, 

agronomics, land use change, remote 

sensing, air quality, biogeochemistry, 

water quality, hydrology, conservation 

biology, limnology, and ecology. EPA 

has instructed ERG to formulate a single 

pool of eighteen (18) candidate external 

reviewers to provide independent 

external peer review. After 

consideration of peer reviewer 

nominations submitted to ERG in 

response to this Federal Register notice 

(FRN) and after consideration of public 

comments on the List of Candidates (to 

be announced in a future FRN), ERG 

will select from this pool the final list 

of up to nine (9) peer reviewers in a 

manner consistent with EPA’s Peer 

Review Handbook 4th Edition, 2015 

(EPA/100/B–15/001), ensuring their 

combined expertise best spans the above 

disciplines. 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
5480 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 

DATES: Nominations should be 

submitted by March 3, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Any interested person or 

organization may nominate scientific 

experts to be considered as peer 

reviewers. Self-nominations will also be 

accepted. Nominations should be 

submitted to ERG no later than March 

3, 2022 by sending an email to: 

peerreview@erg.com (subject line: RtC3 

Peer Review). Nominations should 

include all nominee information 

described in section II of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Questions concerning nominations of 

expert peer reviewers should be 

directed to EPA’s contractor, ERG, by 

email to peerreview@erg.com (subject 

line: RtC3 Peer Review). For information 

on the period of submission, contact the 

ORD Docket at the EPA Headquarters 

Docket Center; phone: 202–566–1752; 

fax: 202–566–9744; or email: 

ord.docket@epa.gov. For technical 

information, contact Christopher Clark; 

phone: 202–564–4183; or email: 

Clark.Christopher@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Information About the Document 

In 2007, Congress enacted the Energy 

Independence and Security Act (EISA) 

with the stated goals of ‘‘mov[ing] the 

United States toward greater energy 

independence and security [and] to 

increase the production of clean 

renewable fuels.’’ In accordance with 

these goals, EISA revised the Renewable 

Fuel Standard (RFS) Program, which 

was created under the 2005 Energy 

Policy Act and is administered by EPA, 

to increase the volume of renewable fuel 

required to be blended into 

transportation fuel to 36 billion gallons 

per year by 2022. Section 204 of EISA 

directs EPA, in consultation with the 

U.S. Departments of Agriculture and 

Energy, to assess and report triennially 

to Congress on the environmental and 

resource conservation impacts of the 

RFS Program. 

The first report to Congress (RtC1) 

was completed in 2011 and provided an 

assessment of the environmental and 

resource conservation impacts 

associated with increased biofuel 

production and use (EPA/600/R–10/ 

183F). The overarching conclusions of 

this first report were: (1) The 

environmental impacts of increased 

biofuel production and use were likely 

negative but limited in impact; (2) there 

was a potential for both positive and 

negative impacts in the future; and (3) 

EISA goals for biofuels production 

could be achieved with minimal 

environmental impacts if best practices 

were used and if technologies advanced 

to facilitate the use of second-generation 

biofuel feedstocks (corn stover, 

perennial grasses, woody biomass, 

algae, and waste). 

The second report to Congress (RtC2) 

was completed in 2018 and reaffirmed 

the overarching conclusions of the RtC1 

(EPA/600/R–18/195). The RtC2 noted 

that the biofuel production and use 

conditions that led to the conclusions of 

the RtC1 had not materially changed, 

and that the production of biofuels from 

cellulosic feedstocks anticipated by both 

the EISA and the RtC1 had not 

materialized. Noting observed increases 

in acreage for corn and soybean 

production in the period prior to and 

following implementation of the RFS2 

Program, the RtC2 concluded that the 

environmental and resource 

conservation impacts associated with 

land use change were likely due, at least 

in part, to the RFS and associated 

production of biofuel feedstocks but that 

further research was needed. 

This RtC3 builds on the previous two 

reports and provides an update on the 

impacts to date of the RFS Program on 

the environment. This report assesses 

air, water, and soil quality; ecosystem 

health and biodiversity; and other 

effects. This third report also includes 

new analyses not previously included in 

the first and second reports. 

II. How To Submit Nominations for 

Peer Reviewers 

Expertise sought: EPA is seeking 

candidates who are nationally and/or 

internationally recognized scientific 

experts to serve as external peer 

reviewers for the draft report. Nominees 

should possess a strong background and 

demonstrated expertise in one or more 

of the following areas: Economics, 

engineering, agronomics, land use 

change, remote sensing, air quality, 

biogeochemistry, water quality, 

hydrology, conservation biology, 

limnology, and ecology. Economists 

should have expertise in partial 

equilibrium modeling (PE), computable 

general equilibrium modeling (CGE), 

and/or econometric studies. All 

candidates should have scientific 

credentials equivalent to a Ph.D., broad 

expertise in biofuels, and should be 

familiar with the Renewable Fuel 

Standard (RFS) Program. 

Selection criteria: From the pool of 

nominees, EPA’s contractor, ERG, will 

select nine peer reviewers, in a manner 

consistent with EPA’s Peer Review 

Handbook 4th Edition, 2015 (EPA/100/ 

B–15/001), based on the following 

factors: (1) Demonstrated expertise in 

the areas listed above through relevant 

peer-reviewed publications; (2) 

professional accomplishments and 

recognition by professional societies; (3) 

demonstrated ability to work 

constructively and effectively in a 

committee setting; (4) absence of 

conflicts of interest; (5) no appearance 

of a lack of impartiality; (6) willingness 

to commit adequate time for a thorough 

review of the draft report, including 

preparation of individual written 

comments that will be made publicly 

available; and (7) availability to 

participate virtually in a public two-day 

or three-day peer review meeting and to 

provide subsequent revised individual 

comments. Registration information, 

meeting dates, and other logistical 

information will be provided in a 

subsequent FRN at least 30 days prior to 

the external peer review meeting. 

Required nominee information: To 

receive full consideration, the following 

information should be provided for each 

nominee in the submission to ERG at 

peerreview@erg.com (subject line: RtC3 

Peer Review): (1) Contact information 

for the person making the nomination; 

(2) contact information for the nominee; 

(3) the disciplinary and specific areas of 

expertise of the nominee; (4) the 

nominee’s curriculum vitae; (5) a 

biographical sketch of the nominee 

indicating current position, educational 

background, past and current research 

activities, recent service on other 

advisory committees, peer review 

panels, editorial boards or professional 

organizations, sources of recent grant 

and/or contract support, and (6) any 

other comments on the relevance of the 

nominee’s expertise to this peer review 

topic. Compensation for non-federal 

peer reviewers will be provided by ERG. 

Selection process: ERG will notify 

nominees of selection or non-selection. 

ERG will also conduct an independent 

search for candidates to assemble a 

balanced group representing the 

expertise needed to fully evaluate EPA’s 

Third Triennial Biofuels and the 

Environment Report to Congress (RtC3). 

ERG will consider and screen all 

nominees against the criteria previously 

described. Following the screening 

process, ERG will narrow the list of 

potential reviewers to eighteen 

candidates. Prior to selecting the final 

peer reviewers, an FRN will be 

published (exact date to be determined) 

to solicit comments on the pool of 

eighteen candidates. In that notice, the 

public will be requested to provide 

relevant information or documentation 

on the candidate pool within 15 days of 

the announcement of the interim list of 

candidates. After considering the public 

comments on the candidate pool, ERG 

will select nine peer reviewers, carefully 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 5481 

weighing a number of factors including 

the candidates’ areas of expertise and 

professional qualifications. 

Timothy Watkins, 

Acting Director, Center for Public Health and 

Environmental Assessment. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02047 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[OMB 3060–XXXX; FR ID 68459] 

Information Collection Being 

Submitted for Review and Approval to 

Office of Management and Budget 

Correction 

In notice document 2022–01205, 

appearing on pages 3299–3330, in the 

issue of Friday, January 21, 2022 make 

the following correction: 

On page 3299, in the second column, 

in the DATES section, ‘‘January 21, 2022’’ 

should read ‘‘February 22, 2022’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2022–01205 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 0099–10–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[OMB 3060–0748 and 3060–0692; FR ID 

69382] 

Information Collections Being 

Submitted for Review and Approval to 

Office of Management and Budget 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC or 

the Commission) invites the general 

public and other Federal Agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Pursuant to the Small Business 

Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC 

seeks specific comment on how it can 

further reduce the information 

collection burden for small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

DATES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be 

submitted on or before March 3, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find this particular information 

collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 

30-day Review—Open for Public 

Comments’’ or by using the search 

function. Your comment must be 

submitted into www.reginfo.gov per the 

above instructions for it to be 

considered. In addition to submitting in 

www.reginfo.gov also send a copy of 

your comment on the proposed 

information collection to Cathy 

Williams, FCC, via email to PRA@

fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

Include in the comments the OMB 

control number as shown in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. To view a 

copy of this information collection 

request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go 

to the web page http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the 

section of the web page called 

‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) click on 

the downward-pointing arrow in the 

‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the 

right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the Title 

of this ICR and then click on the ICR 

Reference Number. A copy of the FCC 

submission to OMB will be displayed. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission may not conduct or 

sponsor a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number. No person shall 

be subject to any penalty for failing to 

comply with a collection of information 

subject to the PRA that does not display 

a valid OMB control number. 

As part of its continuing effort to 

reduce paperwork burdens, as required 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the FCC 

invited the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Comments are requested concerning: (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. Pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4), the FCC seeks specific 

comment on how it might ‘‘further 

reduce the information collection 

burden for small business concerns with 

fewer than 25 employees.’’ 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0748. 

Title: Section 64.104, 64.1509, 

64.1510 Pay-Per-Call and Other 

Information Services. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 5,125 respondents; 5,175 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 2 to 

260 hours. 

Frequency of Response: Annual and 

on occasion reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements; Third 

party disclosure requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority(s) for the information 

collection is found at 47 U.S.C. 

228(c)(7)–(10); Public Law 192–556, 106 

stat. 4181 (1992), codified at 47 U.S.C. 

228 (The Telephone Disclosure and 

Dispute Resolution Act of 1992). 

Total Annual Burden: 47,750 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: None. 

Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 64.1504 of 

the Commission’s rules incorporates the 

requirements of Sections 228(c)(7)–(10) 

of the Communications Act restricting 

the manner in which toll-free numbers 

may be used to charge telephone 

subscribers for information services. 

Common carriers may not charge a 

calling party for information conveyed 

on a toll-free number call, unless the 

calling party: (1) Has executed a written 

agreement that specifies the material 

terms and conditions under which the 

information is provided, or (2) pays for 

the information by means of a prepaid 

account, credit, debit, charge, or calling 

card and the information service 

provider gives the calling party an 

introductory message disclosing the cost 

and other terms and conditions for the 

service. The disclosure requirements are 

intended to ensure that consumers 

know when charges will be levied for 

calls to toll-free numbers and are able to 

obtain information necessary to make 

informed choices about whether to 

purchase toll-free information services. 

47 CFR 64.1509 of the Commission rules 

incorporates the requirements of 47 

U.S.C. (c)(2) and 228 (d)(2)–(3) of the 

Communications Act. Common carriers 

that assign telephone numbers to payVerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Jan 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1

tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE