alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1194 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to ensure food assistance during a major disaster or emergency 

declared under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2021 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS (for himself and Mr. CARBAJAL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to ensure food assistance during 

a major disaster or emergency declared under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Access to 

5 Emergency Meals Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO DUPLICATION OF BENEFITS. 

7 Section 312(b) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Re8 lief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5155(b)) 

9 is amended by adding at the end the following: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1194 IH

1 ‘‘(5) EXCEPTION TO PROHIBITION ON DUPLICA2 TION OF ASSISTANCE.—During the period of a 

3 major disaster or emergency declared under this Act, 

4 this section shall not prohibit the provision of Fed5 eral assistance under this Act to any person who is 

6 or may be entitled to receive nutrition assistance 

7 through a program administered by the Secretary of 

8 Agriculture, and receipt of such assistance shall not 

9 be considered duplicative assistance, except that a 

10 person receiving benefits (as defined in section 3 of 

11 the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 

12 2012)) under only section 5(h)(1) of the Food and 

13 Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2014(h)(1)) may 

14 not simultaneously receive food for distribution to 

15 households authorized under section 413 of this Act 

16 or be certified to receive benefits under section 5(a) 

17 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 

18 2014(a)).’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
Bernandize Mortez ELLIOTT v. STATE

CR-16-0310

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
I 

★

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 106 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide equitable treatment 

for residents of Puerto Rico with respect to the refundable portion 

of the child tax credit and to provide the same treatment to families 

in Puerto Rico with one child or two children that is currently provided 

to island families with three or more children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N (for herself and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

equitable treatment for residents of Puerto Rico with 

respect to the refundable portion of the child tax credit 

and to provide the same treatment to families in Puerto 

Rico with one child or two children that is currently 

provided to island families with three or more children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Tax Credit Eq5 uity for Puerto Rico Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 106 IH1S 

1 SEC. 2. EQUITABLE TREATMENT FOR RESIDENTS OF PUER2 TO RICO WITH RESPECT TO THE REFUND3 ABLE PORTION OF THE CHILD TAX CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(d)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘or section 

6 933’’ after ‘‘section 112’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 December 31, 2020. 

10 SEC. 3. SAME TREATMENT OF FAMILIES IN PUERTO RICO 

11 WITH ONE CHILD OR TWO CHILDREN THAT IS 

12 CURRENTLY PROVIDED TO ISLAND FAMILIES 

13 WITH THREE OR MORE CHILDREN. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(d)(1) of the Internal 

15 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

16 the following: ‘‘In the case of an individual who is a bona 

17 fide resident of Puerto Rico during the entire taxable year, 

18 subparagraph (B)(ii) shall be applied by substituting ‘1 

19 or more qualifying children’ for ‘3 or more qualifying chil20 dren’.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

22 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

23 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Kenneth Y. Tanji,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 11, 2007



/s/ Kenneth Y. TanjiName:

Kenneth Y. TanjiTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
bpo_10k-ex1016.htm


    
      Exhibit
10.16

    

    
 

    AMENDMENT
TO THE

    BPO
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

    2007
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     

    


    WHEREAS, the BPO Management
Services, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) has been established by
BPO Management Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), effective
upon its approval by the shareholders of the Company; and

    


    WHEREAS, the shareholders of the
Company approved the Plan in June 2007; and

    


    WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the
shareholders of the Company have approved this Amendment to the Plan to be
effective as of December 29, 2008;

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby
amended as follows:

    


    Section 3.1 of the Plan is deleted, and
the following Section 3.1 is substituted in lieu thereof:

    


    
      	
              3.1

            	
              Number of Shares.
      Subject to the adjustment provisions of Section 5.10, the Share
      Limitation shall be 12,300,000 Shares. No Options to purchase fractional
      Shares shall be granted or issued under the Plan. For purposes of this
      Section 3.1, the Shares that shall be counted toward the Share
      Limitation shall include all Shares issued or issuable pursuant to Options
      that have been or may be exercised.

            


    

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BPO Management
Services, Inc., acting by and through its officer hereunto duly authorized, has
executed this instrument to be effective December 29, 2008.

     

     

    BPO
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

    By: /s/ James Cortens        

    Name: James
Cortens

    Title: Secretary                                

    
 

     

     

    1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of America’s Car-Mart, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Tilman J.Falgout, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark D. Slusser,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify in our capacities as officersof the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of ourknowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

 

 
| By:    | \s\ Tilman  J. Falgout, III            |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Tilman J.  Falgout, III                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                |
|   | July 14, 2005                          |
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
| By:    | \s\ Mark D.  Slusser                   |   |
|   | Mark D.  Slusser                       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and  Secretary |
|   | July 14, 2005                          |
|   |                                   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 93 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 93

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   require the United States and the States to jointly ensure a high-
       quality education to all persons within the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 2, 2022

  Mr. DeSaulnier submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   require the United States and the States to jointly ensure a high-
       quality education to all persons within the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The United States, the States, Indian Tribes, and 
territories shall jointly ensure a high-quality education to all 
persons within the United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3072

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Justin James Rodriguez, also known as Justin James Lee Rodriguez, also known as

Justin James Hunter

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul

____________

 Submitted: March 11, 2013

Filed: April 5, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Justin James Rodriguez pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a

firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The district court1

 sentenced Rodriguez

to 108 months of imprisonment. Rodriguez appeals, contending the district court's

sentence is substantively unreasonable. We affirm.

Rodriguez was charged with unlawfully possessing a firearm after police

discovered a photo on his cellular phone of Rodriguez posing with a gun in his

cousin's apartment. At sentencing, the district court stated it intended to vary

downward from the 120-month statutory maximum due to the lack of immediate

danger posed to the public by Rodriguez's possession of the gun, as well as his

challenging upbringing, which included difficult family circumstances and an

addiction to alcohol he developed at an early age. At the same time, the court noted

the extent of the variance was limited by Rodriguez's lengthy criminal history, which

the court found "as extensive as can be given someone [Rodriguez's] age." Sent. Tr.

14.

We review "the substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed under an

abuse-of-discretion standard." Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). An

abuse of discretion occurs when the district court "fails to consider a relevant factor

that should have received significant weight, gives significant weight to an improper

or irrelevant factor, or considers only the appropriate factors but commits a clear error

of judgment in weighing those factors." United States v. Moore, 565 F.3d 435, 438

(8th Cir. 2009) (quotation and citation omitted).

The district court stated its reasons for the sentence handed down after

considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. A sentencing court has "wide latitude to

weigh the § 3553(a) factors in each case and assign some factors greater weight than

1

The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

-2-
others in determining an appropriate sentence." United States v. Bridges, 569 F.3d

374, 379 (8th Cir. 2009). In this case, the district court's decision to balance the

mitigating factors of Rodriguez's upbringing and the nature of the offense against the

aggravating factor of Rodriguez's criminal history is well within the considerable

discretion of the district court. We can find no basis for concluding Rodriguez's

sentence was substantively unreasonable.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________

-3-
Current as of December 2017

Learn more at www.nationalguard.mil

Point of Contact: NGB Public Affairs at (703) 601-6767

Highlights

• Provides command and control of all

NG forces within the state or territory

for the governor

• Acts as a joint headquarters during

national level or contingency response

efforts

• Provides situational awareness and

resource requirements to Department

of Defense authorities before and

during operations

• Appoints one or more JTF- State

commander(s) to support civil

authorities and command and control

for NG forces

• Supports a dual-status commander led

JTF-State when the governor and

secretary of defense agree to this

command relationship for major civil

support operations involving both NG

and active component forces

• Coordinates any additional support

required, including mobilization of

additional forces and logistical support

Provides the State Common Operating Picture

Mission: The JFHQ-State provides command and control of all National 

Guard (NG) forces in the state or territory for the governor, or in the 

case of the District of Columbia, the Secretary of Defense. One of the 

responsibilities of the JFHQ-State is to support Joint Task Force-State 

(JTF-State) commanders and all of the deployed units within the state, 

as well as acting as an information channel to the National Guard 

Bureau and combatant commanders. The JFHQ-State coordinates any 

additional support required, such as mobilization of extra forces, or 

providing other logistical support. The JFHQ-State can also act as a 

joint headquarters for national-level response efforts during contingency 

operations.

Overview: The JFHQ-State commands all assigned military units 

ordered to support contingency operations, and coordinates situational 

awareness and resource requirements with combatant commanders. It 

is also responsible for providing situational awareness and common 

operating picture information to national level headquarters before and 

during contingency operations. In addition, it is responsible for providing 

joint reception, staging, onward movement, and integration of all 

inbound forces. For small operations, task force functions are performed 

by the adjutant general using existing 

JFHQ-State staff, without any augmentation, and with small troop 

elements such as transportation or aviation units, or Weapons of Mass 

Destruction Civil Support Teams.

Joint Force Headquarters State

 (JFHQ-State)
Scott Henry WHEELER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3013

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 27, 2018

Thomas D. Sommerville, of Law Offices of Thomas D. Sommerville, P.A., Orlando, and Stuart I. Hyman, Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1


                                 EXHIBIT 3.1.2

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                              MAGELLAN CORPORATION

         Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Corporation Code, Magellan
Corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of
Incorporation:

         FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Magellan Corporation.

         SECOND: The following Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of
the Corporation was adopted by resolution of the shareholders at a meeting duly
held on June 1, 1987 in the manner prescribed by the Colorado Corporation Code:

         ARTICLE I of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation is
hereby repealed and amended by substitution of the following:

                                 ARTICLE I NAME

         1.1      The name of the Corporation is: Power-Cell, Inc.


         THIRD: The number of shares voted for the Amendment to Article I was
sufficient for approval.

         FIFTH: The Amendment does not provide for an exchange, reclassification
or cancellation of issued shares.


<PAGE>   2


         SIXTH: The Amendment does not effect a change in the amount of stated
capital.

         DATED: February 18, 1988

                                                MAGELLAN CORPORATION



                                                By: /s/  Darrel McCullough
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Darrel McCullough, President

ATTEST:


/s/ Carylyn K. Bell
-----------------------------------
Carylyn K. Bell, Secretary


State of Colorado            )
                                  ) ss.
City and County of Denver    )

         I, Gloria C. Mowery , a notary public in the aforesaid county and
state, certify that Darrel McCullough and Carylyn K. Bell were personally known
to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing Amendment
to the Articles of Incorporation of Magellan Corporation, and appeared before
me this date in person and acknowledged that they signed, sealed and delivered
said instrument in writing as their true and voluntary act and deed for the
purposes and uses therein set forth.

         GIVEN under my hand and seal this 18th day of February, 1988.

[Seal]

                                                     /s/ Gloria C. Mowery
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Notary Public

My commission expires:       12-2-90
                       --------------------
L AW O FFICES OF

RAYMOND P. FITZPATRICK, JR.

1200 C ORPORATE D RIVE

, S UITE 105

B IRMINGHAM

, A LABAMA 352 42

T ELEPHONE (205) 437

- 8846

October 1 4 , 2015

Electronically and by Overnight Delivery

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

West Building Ground Floor , Room W12

- 140

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment To Exemption No. 11545 Issued To

Clean Energy Renewables, LLC Pursuant To Section 333 of

The FAA Reform Act, Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0399

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On May 11, 2015, FAA granted the referenced Section 333 exemption to conduct aerial

data collection to Clean Energy Renewables, LLC ("CER"). CER respectfully requ ests an

amendment to authorize the use of additional UAS system s

.

CER seek s approval to u tilize the follow ing UAS platforms manufactured by Sky Eye

Innovations:

Sky Eye T

- Series UAV

Sky Eye A

- Series UAV

Sky Eye OGI UAV

Sky Eye Micro UAV

These UAS platforms have not been previously reviewed by FAA. Technical specifica t ions for

each of the listed Sky Eye products are included in the confidenti al operating manual that is

being filed with FAA by overnight delivery under separate cover. Also confidentially submitted

is additional technical information and safety procedures in the format of FAA Order 8130. 34C

Appendix D. To the extent not addressed in these documents, all operations will be conducted in

accord with CER's current exemption and standard Section 333 operating procedures and

conditions.October 14, 2014

Page 2

The gross weight of each of these units is un der 10 lb s., with a maximum gross weight,

including payload

, of under 20 lbs. CER requests that the Secretary find

, in conside r ation of the

size, weight, speed and limited operating area associated with these aircraft and their operation

, that the aircr aft meet the conditions of Section 333 and relief from 14 CFR part 21, to the extent

needed, is appropriate.

CER requests authority to utilize the Sky Eye UA S platforms listed above i n the same

manner for aerial data collection and subject to all other conditions as set forth in CER's

Exemption No. 11545.

CER believes the requested amendment will not set any precedent or raise any new

issues. We request that FAA dispense with publication of the summary of this petition in the

Federal Register and grant the requested amendment on a summary basis.

An amendment to Exemption No . 11545 to authorize use of each of the Sky Eye UAS

systems listed above is respectfully requeste d.

Yours very truly,

/s/ Raymond P. Fitzpatrick, Jr.

Raymond P. Fitzpatrick, Jr.

Attorney for Clean Energy Renewables, LLC

RPFjr/deb