5460 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 

1See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: 

Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 

81 FR 81062 (November 17, 2016) (Order). 2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 54423 (October 1, 2021). 3See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Notice 

of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review 

of the Countervailing Duty Order on Welded 

Stainless Pressure Pipe from India,’’ dated October 

15, 2021. 

4 Id. 

5See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘First 

Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Countervailing Order 

on Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from India: 

Domestic Producers’ Substantive Response to 

Notice of Initiation,’’ dated October 29, 2021. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on October 1, 2021,’’ dated November 30, 

2021. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Expedited 

First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from 

India,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

8Commerce determined that Sunrise Stainless 

Private Limited, Sun Mark Stainless Pvt. Ltd., and 

Shah Foils Ltd. are entitled to the same subsidy 

rate. See Order, 81 FR at 81064. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–868] 

Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From 

India: Final Results of the Expedited 

First Sunset Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

(CVD) order on welded stainless 

pressure pipe (WSPP) from India would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of countervailable subsidies 

at the levels as indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Applicable February 1, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8362. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 17, 2016, Commerce 

published the CVD order on WSPP from 

India in the Federal Register.1 On 

October 1, 2021, Commerce published 

the notice of initiation of the first fiveyear (sunset) review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On 

October 15, 2021, Commerce received a 

notice of intent to participate from 

Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers 

Corporation, and Primus Pipe & Tube, 

Inc. (collectively, domestic interested 

parties) within the deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic 

interested parties claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act as domestic producers of 

WSPP.4 On October 29, 2021, 

Commerce received a substantive 

response from the domestic interested 

parties within the 30-day deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5

Commerce did not receive a substantive 

response from any respondent 

interested parties. 

On November 30, 2021, Commerce 

notified the U.S. International Trade 

Commission that it did not receive an 

adequate substantive response from 

respondent interested parties.6

Accordingly, pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is welded stainless pressure pipe 

from India. For a full description of the 

scope, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Services System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNotices/ListLayout.aspx. A list 

of the issues discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines 

that revocation of the Order would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of countervailable subsidies 

at the following net countervailable 

subsidy rates: 

Producer/exporter 

Net 

countervailable 

subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Steamline Industries Limited (Steamline) ...................................................................................................................................... 3.13 

Sunrise Stainless Private Limited/Sun Mark Stainless Pvt. Ltd./Shah Foils Ltd. (Sunrise Companies) 8 .................................... 6.22 

All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4.65 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218. 

Dated: January 26, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 5461 

1See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip from India: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 41949 (August 4, 2021) 

(Preliminary Results) and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2The petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films; 

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.; and SKC, Inc. 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene 

Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from 

India: Request for Extension of Briefing Schedule,’’ 

dated August 25, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘2019–2020 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene 

Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from 

India,’’ dated August 27, 2021. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip (PET Film) from India: Supplemental 

Questionnaire,’’ dated September 1, 2021. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip (PET Film) from India: Supplemental 

Questionnaire,’’ dated September 10, 2021. 

7See SRF’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 

(PET) Film from India: Submission of 1st 

Supplemental Response of Anti-dumping Admin 

Review Questionnaire,’’ dated September 16, 2021 

(SRF’s September 16, 2021 SQR). 

8See Jindal’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative 

Review of the Ani-Dumping Duty Order on 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip 

(PET Film) from India: Supplemental Questionnaire 

Response,’’ dated September 24, 2021. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from India— 

Briefing,’’ dated November 18, 2021. 

10See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 44175 (July 1, 

2002) (Order). 

11See Memorandum, ‘‘Jindal’s Final Analysis 

Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with the 

signature of this Federal Register notice. 

12See Jindal’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative 

Review of the Ani-Dumping Duty Order on 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip 

(PET Film) from India: Supplemental Questionnaire 

Response,’’ dated September 24, 2021. 

13See SRF’s September 16, 2021 SQR at 7–8. See 

also Memorandum, ‘‘SRF’s Final Analysis 

Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with the 

signature of this Federal Register notice. 

14See Preliminary Results PDM. 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–01956 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–824] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip from India: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 4, 2021, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 

and strip (PET film) from India. The 

period of review (POR) is July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020. We received no 

comments or requests for a hearing. We 

continue to find that sales of subject 

merchandise by Jindal Poly Films 

Limited (Jindal) and SRF Limited of 

India (SRF) were not made at less than 

normal value during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable February 1, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5255. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 4, 2021, Commerce 

published the preliminary results for 

this administrative review.1 In the 

Preliminary Results, we invited 

interested parties to comment within 30 

days. The petitioners 2 also requested an 

extension of the briefing schedule on 

August 25, 2021.3 Commerce issued a 

memorandum to all interested parties 

on August 27, 2021, which granted the 

petitioners’ request and stated that we 

would reset the deadlines to submit case 

briefs on a later date.4 On September 1, 

2021, we issued a supplemental 

questionnaire to SRF.5 On September 

10, 2021, we issued a supplemental 

questionnaire to Jindal.6 On September 

16, 2021, SRF submitted its response to 

our supplemental questionnaire.7 On 

September 24, 2021, Jindal submitted its 

response to our supplemental 

questionnaire.8 On November 18, 2021, 

Commerce extended these final results 

and then on November 23, 2021, 

Commerce established the revised 

deadlines for the briefing schedule.9 No 

interested party submitted comments or 

requested a hearing in this 

administrative review. The current 

deadline for these final results is 

January 28, 2022. Commerce conducted 

this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 

Scope of the Order 10

The products covered by the Order 

are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or 

primed PET film, whether extruded or 

coextruded. Excluded are metalized 

films and other finished films that have 

had at least one of their surfaces 

modified by the application of a 

performance-enhancing resinous or 

inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 

inches thick. Imports of polyethylene 

terephthalate film, sheet, and strip are 

currently classifiable in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under item number 

3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes. The written description of the 

scope of the Order is dispositive. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

As noted above, Commerce received 

no comments concerning the 

Preliminary Results. Jindal submitted 

corrected information for a movement 

charge, which had been inadvertently 

omitted in its prior filings.11 Also, in 

response to instructions from 

Commerce, Jindal separated information 

for discounts and rebates that were 

grouped together.12 We incorporated 

these corrections and updated 

information into these final results; we 

continue to find that sales of subject 

merchandise by Jindal were not made at 

less than normal value during the POR. 

SRF submitted corrected information for 

its quantity discount as explained in its 

supplemental questionnaire.13 We also 

incorporated the corrections and 

updated information into these final 

results; we also continue to find that 

sales of subject merchandise made by 

SRF were not made at less than normal 

value during the POR. Accordingly, no 

decision memorandum accompanies 

this Federal Register notice. For further 

details of the issues addressed in this 

proceeding, see the Preliminary Results 

and the accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.14

Final Results of Review 

The final weighted-average dumping 

margins for the period July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020, are as shown 

below: 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE