alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1014 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1014

   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a pilot 
  program to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to a veteran who has a 
       traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2021

 Mr. Murphy of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a pilot 
  program to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to a veteran who has a 
       traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans National Traumatic Brain 
Injury Treatment Act''.

SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM TO FURNISH HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY TO A VETERAN 
              WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY OR POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS 
              DISORDER.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
implement a pilot program to furnish HBOT to a veteran who has a 
traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder through a 
health care provider described in section 1703(c)(5) of title 38, 
United States Code.
    (b) Locations.--The Secretary shall select three Veterans 
Integrated Service Networks in which to operate the pilot program.
    (c) Funding.--
            (1) There is in the general fund of the Treasury a fund to 
        be known as the ``VA HBOT Fund'' (in this Act referred to as 
        the ``Fund'').
            (2) The sole source of monies for the Fund shall be 
        donations received by the Secretary for express purposes of the 
        Fund.
            (3) Amounts in the Fund shall be available to the Secretary 
        without fiscal year limitation to pay for HBOT under subsection 
        (a).
            (4) The Fund shall terminate on the termination date under 
        subsection (d).
    (d) Termination.--The pilot program shall terminate on the day that 
is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (e) HBOT Defined.--In this Act, the term ``HBOT'' means hyperbaric 
oxygen therapy with a medical device--
            (1) approved by the Food and Drug Administration; or
            (2) issued an investigational device exemption by the Food 
        and Drug Administration.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAMARA NODAROVNA

LATSABIDZE; TAMAZ LATSABIDZE,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71601

Agency Nos. A079-258-307

 A079-258-308

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. 

Lamara Nodarovna Latsabidze and Tamaz Latsabidze, citizens of Georgia,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying

their motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Our jurisdiction

is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a

FILED

AUG 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71601

motion to reopen and de novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d

785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review.

The BIA acted within its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen

because petitioners did not establish that former counsel “failed to perform with

sufficient competence.” See Mohammed, 400 F.3d at 793. It follows that

petitioners’ claim that the BIA violated due process fails. See Lata v. INS, 204

F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error for a petitioner to prevail on a due

process claim). 

We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ contention that former counsel’s

appeal brief failed to adequately challenge the immigration judge’s decision

because petitioners failed to raise this claim with the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft,

358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (generally requiring exhaustion of claims before

the BIA). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Akeem Antonio JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3076

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Urologix, Inc. I,
Michael M. Selzer, Jr, President and Chief Executive Officer of Urologix, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     .    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     .    The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Urologix, Inc.


Date: May 14, 2003                     /s/ Michael M. Selzer, Jr
                                       -------------------------
                                       Michael M. Selzer, Jr
                                       President
                                       and Chief Executive Officer
1

The Dow Chemical 

Company

Misting In 

Solventless Adhesives

1
2

2
3

3
4

4
5

5
6

6
7

7
8

8
9

9
10

10
11

11
12

12
13

Summary

+Misting is a function of:

+Adhesive rheology

+Configuration of the coating station

+Adhesive and roll temperature

+Line speed

+Misting can be handled by:

+Changing adhesive system

+Increasing adhesive pool and 

application roll temperature

+Lowering line speed

+Containment

13
**Exhibit 24.4**

 

 
| STATE OF  ARKANSAS | § |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------|
| COUNTY OF BENTON   | § |   |

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

Know all menby these presents, that I, CARL E. BAGGETT, a Director of AMERICA’S CAR-MART,INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint TILMAN J. FALGOUT, III andMARK D. SLUSSER my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power ofsubstitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant to therequirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report onForm 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and NationalAssociation of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto andother documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in mystead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substituteor substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

In witnesswhereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 11th day of July,2005.

 

 
|   | /s/ Carl E.  Baggett |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   | CARL E.  BAGGETT     |

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

 

Before me this11th day of July, 2005, came CARL E. BAGGETT, personally known tome, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power ofAttorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.

 

 
|   | /s/ Camille  A. Hector |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|
|   | NOTARY  PUBLIC         |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                               

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>                           
<CIK>                              0000797917
<NAME>                             RAYTECH CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. DOLLARS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1
   
<CASH>                             7,482
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      30,473                  
<ALLOWANCES>                       1,415
<INVENTORY>                        30,869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   75,969 
<PP&E>                             163,906 
<DEPRECIATION>                     92,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     173,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              68,443
<BONDS>                            0 
<COMMON>                           5,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         58,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       173,804
<SALES>                            247,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   247,464
<CGS>                              188,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      188,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 2,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    24,800
<INCOME-TAX>                       6,944
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                16,357
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       16,357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      4.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                      4.61



    

</TABLE>
14910-13-PI

DEPARTJ\<IENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal A\"i<ltion Administration _eM""".'.""

VV4aYrP

1;4eFR Parr 39

OQS2

IDockl't No. FAA-2010J'''''''**; DireClOrall' Idenritkr 2010-NM-131-AOj

Rll'i 2120-.'\.-\64

Ain\!Jnhin('s~ Directh'l's: Airbus :\-locie] ;\,33(121)1) anti -:.JUU Scrics Airp!:HlC"s: :md

A.(;ENC'{: F•..•dcra! AViation !\d11lin\strat!{1n (FAA), DOT.

,\CTIO!\": :"otice ofproposeL1 ruknnkll1g tNPW"'l).

",..,..A~.,.',....,~""

SLJ\IJ\IARY: \\"e propose to ;.,clOpl2 l]C\\ Jif\VT1h,ncss dlT<:ct)\C (ADI Cor the PWdl.1Cl';:'C-t..-._

liSled above. This proposed :\.D rCSldl$rT\11l1m;;ndalOr~ cominuillii ilJn.\orllllll'':SS I S/1:.'O 1/-0

,III I'onllallon t!'Iei .A 1) onglll<:lc " dI)1an a\'];111011 "II <l1l1l(Jl"lly QI.:JJH'LK'r 1 eQunln lO IL~'J111 . j '1'1V ~'iLi~ ",~~,,::, A-;::;:"-

;ml1comxt an unsufetc>mhiioi1 on Ull3\'1:11;011 p .dUd The \'lC,\! de5crib~'"lh, llm:J(~y..--a.J -IIi

ITJlw FAA pubiish<,:d SF.:'\R 138(Special FCtkrnl AVlution R..:gulallLlIl 881.

F'.1lil!TC of the Lll[\]liary pov,:er ulli! (APljl bleed kak detection sys1l:m could rcsuh 111

• • • •

Bv Illail relcrenccJ O-iOO'02j07/01~L29f:, March 41h.l001 ami

O~(Jf)'O]j07t03-1J)~-l-of February 2603 \hc JAA fCC"Oll1mcndcJ;0 ;he

National A",,,,,io,,, Ai!thoritics (NAA) th± appl;;:al1on of a SHllll2.f

regul:lllon

The aim Oflhis regulation is to rcquir..: *"' '* a ddinilion r';:\'IC\V' ,lg:lil1S;

explosi\'>11 hal.:lrds_

v',,, '",>[ oi',i>, Iud lank 10e<1"0 '" Ihe i>OU/onl ,,,,bil,"" and 'S",u"n ,,' Ihe f"", ','I"'"

FAt:. Form' 361}-14.1 (6-89) O,=FICIAlFILECO?~ '"US GO",'"::"'·'11", f "1'","'TI"';; <:"r,C!' '%.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1218 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1218

To require the Federal Communications Commission to incorporate data on 
        maternal health outcomes into its broadband health maps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2021

 Mr. Butterfield (for himself, Mr. Bilirakis, and Ms. Blunt Rochester) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Communications Commission to incorporate data on 
        maternal health outcomes into its broadband health maps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Data Mapping to Save Moms' Lives 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MAPPING BROADBAND CONNECTIVITY AND MATERNAL HEALTH OUTCOMES.

    (a) Incorporation of Maternal Health Outcome Data.--The Federal 
Communications Commission shall incorporate data on maternal health 
outcomes for not less than 1 year postpartum, as recommended by the 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under subsection (b), into 
the most recently available broadband health mapping tools of the 
Commission.
    (b) Consultation With CDC.--The Federal Communications Commission 
shall consult with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
regarding the maternal health outcomes that should be incorporated into 
the most recently available broadband health mapping tools of the 
Commission under subsection (a).

SEC. 3. GAO STUDY.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall study and submit to 
Congress a report on--
            (1) the effectiveness of internet connectivity in reducing 
        maternal morbidity rates; and
            (2) who is best suited to take responsibility for ensuring 
        better internet connectivity to reduce maternal morbidity 
        rates.
                                 <all>
```
Christopher Thomas HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1074

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7052

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BETTY J. MURPHY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-7274

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BETTY J. MURPHY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-89-280-WS, CA-96-632-6)
2

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty J. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)

and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Murphy, Nos. CR-89-280-WS; CA-96-632-6 (M.D.N.C. July 18,

1997 and Aug. 15, 1997). We deny Appellant's motions for transcripts at government expense, unsealing of documents, additional

briefing, appointment of counsel, and reinstatement of in forma

pauperis status. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
R.C.W. v. STATE

CR-16-0067

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit E

Case: 2:18-cv-00190-MHW-CMV Doc #: 32-5 Filed: 12/21/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 278
Case: 2:18-cv-00190-MHW-CMV Doc #: 32-5 Filed: 12/21/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 279
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

October 4, 2021

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

540 Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse 

100 East Fifth Street

Cincinnati, OH 45202-3988

Re: William T. Schmitt, et al.

v. Craig M. Stephens, et al.

No. 21-491

(Your No. 20-4025)

Dear Clerk:

The petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case was filed on 

September 30, 2021 and placed on the docket October 4, 2021 as No. 21-491. 

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

by

Michael Duggan

Case Analyst

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202) 479-3011

Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 86 Filed: 10/08/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 657
Jason JACOBS, Appellant, v. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-1181

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 29, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00383-CV

HLI RAIL AND RIGGING, LLC,

Appellant

v.

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAIL WAY COMPANY, Texas Mexican Railroad Company, 

Lone Star Railroad Contractors, Inc., Mexrail, Inc., Felipe Nevarez, Fireman’s Fund Insurance 

Company, AIG Mexico Securos Interamericana, S.A. de C.V. Chartis Mexico, Zass Recuperos 

S.A. de C.V., and City Underwriting Agency, Inc.

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-10-338

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 21, 2012

APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant’s brief was due October 15, 2012. When appellant failed to file the brief, 

appellee Lone Star Railroad Contractors, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). We held appellee’s motion for ten days to permit 

appellant to file a response. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). We held it an additional ten days 

pursuant to the mailbox rule. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b). On the tenth day, appellant filed its 

own motion to dismiss the appeal, stating it no longer desired to pursue the appeal. Accordingly, 
04-12-00383-CV

- 2 -

we grant appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and deny appellee’s motion to dismiss the 

appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellant.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
#### Augusta Niemarck v. Maria Schwartz.

*Amendment of decla/raMon.*

An amendment is not objectionable for changing tbe date of a transaction so as to make it cpver a longer time than was at first averred • in the declaration, if it does not in any way change the obligation sued on.

*467Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.)

October 4.

October 10.

Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

*Michael Brennam,*for appellant.

*Sweet & Flcmders*for appellee.

Campbell, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for the value -of a return passage to Europe, under an alleged agreement by defendant that if she would come over to this country and become dissatisfied, defendant would provide for such return. There was also a small item of money paid out for .gloves.

The only questions raised by the assignments are confined ■in effect to a claim that there was no evidence tending to prove any such agreement as was sued upon. The objection that an amendment was allowed concerning the date of the transaction, as running through a longer time than originally charged, has no force, as it did not in any way .change tfie obligation sued on.

There certainly was evidence which, if believed, — as it was believed, — fully justified the jury in their finding. The •court presented the whole subject very carefully and very fairly to the jury, and no complaint is made of the rulings except that there was no testimony to justify leaving the case to them at all.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4624-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-4624-DR), dated October 4, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

The amendment was issued December 27, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this declared disaster is now July 29, 2021, through and including August 2, 2021.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-02230 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P