alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        24.4**
 STATE
        OF
        ARKANSAS §
 COUNTY
        OF
        BENTON §
  POWER
        OF
        ATTORNEY
 
 Know
        all
        men by these presents, that I, CARL E. BAGGETT, a Director of AMERICA’S
        CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint TILMAN J.
        FALGOUT, III and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
        with
        full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant
        to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report
        on
        Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006
        and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National
        Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto
        and
        other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in
        my
        stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,
        incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, hereby
        ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute
        or
        substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 In
        witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 10 th day of
        July, 2006.
 
 
 
 /s/
                  Carl E.
                  BaggettCARL
                  E. BAGGETT
 
 
 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 
 Before
        me
        this 10 th day of
        July, 2006, came CARL E. BAGGETT, personally known to me, who in my presence
        did
        sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged
        the
        same as his true act and deed.
 
 
 
 /s/
                  Camille A.
                  HectorNOTARY
                  PUBLIC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

Stephanie Hughes 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

The Lincoln National Life Insurance

Company 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 3:17-cv-276 

Judge Thomas Rose 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: 

TERMINATION ENTRY 

 

 The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter 

has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with 

prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause 

shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. 

 Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement 

should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 

(1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

December 18, 2018 

 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 ____________________________________ 

 Honorable Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge
Tequan Sabre GRAHAM v. STATE

CR-15-1326

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Exhibit 31.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, William B. Yarmuth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Almost Family, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
    most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
    registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls over financial reporting.

      Date:   March 31, 2006

BY  /s/ William B. Yarmuth
        -------------------
        William B. Yarmuth
        Chairman of the Board, President &
        Chief Executive Officer
Robert CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2195

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Bryan Douglas CANNON

CR-16-0158

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30,

2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00165-CV

FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

OVATION SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-75436

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a February 9. 2024 “notice of non-suit

partial dismissal” filed on February 9, 2024 by appellee Ovation Services LLC,

which resulted in a partial dismissal. Generally, appeals may be taken only from 

final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). 

When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain 

interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory 
2

exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 

2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. 

proceeding).

Appellant Francisco Rodriguez filed a notice of appeal on March 04, 2024

specifying that Rodriguez “wants to appeal [the] motion of non-suit partial 

dismissal filed.” On March 15, 2024, Ovation Services filed a motion to dismiss 

for want of jurisdiction.

On May 1, 2024, this court sent a notice of involuntary dismissal for want of 

jurisdiction unless any party filed a response showing meritorious grounds for 

continuing the appeal on or before May 15, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

Rodriguez’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the 

appeal. Accordingly, we grant Ovation Services’ motion and dismiss the appeal for 

want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Spain and Poissant.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0402. BOAZ YEHIEL BADICHI v. ALBION TRADING INC., et al.

Boaz Yehiel Badichi seeks discretionary review of the trial court’s grant of

partial summary judgment to Albion Trading, Inc., SBS 384, LLC, SBS 276, LLC,

and SBS Holdings at Tall Pines Apartments, LLC in this action for equitable partition

and accounting. We transferred the application to the Supreme Court, which returned

it to us on July 12, 2016, after concluding that it did not have jurisdiction. The

appellees’ motion for reconsideration, which sought the return of the appeal to this

Court, is therefore DENIED AS MOOT. 

The grant of partial summary judgment may be directly appealed. See OCGA

§ 9-11-56 (h); see also Whiddon v. Stargell, 192 Ga. App. 826, 828 (386 SE2d 884)

(1989). Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j), this court will grant an otherwise timely

discretionary application if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal.

Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED. The defendants shall have 10

days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal with the superior court, if

they have not already done so. The superior court clerk is instructed to include a copy

of this order in the appellate record. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/10/2016

August 10, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4630-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4630-DR), dated December 12, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued January 6, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective December 11, 2021.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-02237 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          14,896
<SECURITIES>                                    26,314
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,311
<PP&E>                                          19,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,630
<BONDS>                                         12,004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       228,153
<OTHER-SE>                                   (195,288)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,865
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,740
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (378)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,156)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,156)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,156)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>               5

<LEGEND>

The accompanying supplemental data are to be used in conjunction
with the unaudited financial statements and associates notes to
the financial statements for the quarter ended September 30,
1996.

</LEGEND>

       

<S>                                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                                  203,045 <F1>

<SECURITIES>                            12,000

<RECEIVABLES>                           570,446 <F2>

<ALLOWANCES>                            0

<INVENTORY>                             559,994

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,466,333

<PP&E>                                  3,728,813       <F3>

<DEPRECIATION>                          0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          5,936,007

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,324,410

<BONDS>                                 0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                             0

<COMMON>                                        22,665

<OTHER-SE>                                      5,813,469       <F4>

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,936,007

<SALES>                                 2,663,385

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,663,385

<CGS>                                   741,380

<TOTAL-COSTS>                           3,267,954

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (119,558)

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (754,127)

<INCOME-TAX>                            0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (754,127)

<DISCONTINUED>                          0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                                       0

<NET-INCOME>                            (754,127)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.17)

<EPS-DILUTED>                           0

<FN>

<F1>    Cash includes Restricted Cash of $50,000

<F2>    Receivables are recorded net of allowances for doubtful
accounts

<F3>    PP&E is recorded Net of Depreciation

<F4>    Other Stockholders Equity includes Additional Paid in
Capital

</FN>

        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION  The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:  (1)
     The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: May 12, 2011/s/   Stryker Warren, jr.Stryker Warren, jr.
Chief Executive Officer/s/   Brian J. SmrdelBrian J. Smrdel 
Chief Financial Officer


---
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and Johns Eastern Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Gina YAEGER, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2399

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 2, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 89 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to contributions and expenditures with respect to Federal elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2022 

Mr. YARMUTH submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to contributions and expenditures with 

respect to Federal elections. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 89 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Financial expenditures, or in-kind 

3 equivalents, with respect to a candidate for Federal office, 

4 without regard to whether or not a communication ex5 pressly advocates the election or defeat of a specified can6 didate in the election, shall not constitute protected 

7 speech, as guaranteed by this Constitution or any amend8 ment to this Constitution. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to enact 

10 a mandatory public financing system to provide funds to 

11 qualified candidates in elections for Federal office, which 

12 shall be the sole source of funds raised or spent with re13 spect to Federal elections. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have power to enforce 

15 the provisions of this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Nos. 07-14-00076-CR, 07-14-00078-CR, 

07-14-00079-CR 

LAMONT D. SPENCER, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 3 

Tarrant County, Texas 

Trial Court Nos. 1299134D, 1304136D, 1306654D, Honorable Robb Catalano, Presiding 

 

June 27, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Appellant Lamont D. Spencer appeals his felony conviction for aggravated sexual 

assault of a child, and two charges of felony indecency with a child by contact. 

Appellant pled guilty to each charge under an open plea. The offenses involved three 

different victims. The trial court assessed punishment at forty-five years’ confinement in 

prison for the aggravated sexual assault charge and twenty years’ confinement in prison 

for each charge of indecency with a child. The sentences run concurrently. Appellant’s 
2

court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by an 

Anders1brief. We will grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgments of 

the trial court.

Counsel expresses the opinion in the motion that the appeals are without merit 

and frivolous. The brief reviews proceedings in the trial court through the sentencing 

hearing and substantiates counsel’s conclusion. Correspondence from counsel to 

appellant indicates counsel provided appellant a copy of the motion to withdraw and 

Anders brief and advised appellant of his right to file a response. By letter, this court 

also notified appellant of his opportunity to submit a response but appellant did not file a 

response.

In conformity with the standards of the United States Supreme Court, we do not 

rule on a motion to withdraw before independently examining the record. Nichols v. 

State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.). If we determine the 

appeal has arguable merit, we will remand it to the trial court for appointment of new 

counsel. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

We have reviewed the entire record to determine whether any arguable ground 

supports an appeal. Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 

(1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Finding no arguable 

ground supporting a claim of reversible error, we agree with counsel that the appeal is 

 

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); see 

In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
3

frivolous. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw2and affirm the trial 

court’s judgments.

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish. 

 

 

2 Counsel shall, within five days after the opinion is handed down, send his client 

a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant’s right to file 

a pro se petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals. TEX. R.

APP. P. 48.4.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Telstar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Calello,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 29, 2007

By:  /s/ Charles Calello
     -------------------------------------
     Charles Calello- President and
     Chief Executive Officer