alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Canadian-Led CTF 150 Seize Nearly 2,000kg of Narcotics in Two Interdictions in a Single Day

## From Combined Maritime Forces Public Affairs 

The Royal Navy’s HMS Lancaster, a Duke-class Type 23 frigate, seized over 800 kg of hashish, 390 kg of methamphetamines and 110 kg of heroine from a stateless dhow in the Arabian Sea. This was the crew’s first day of deployment after completing a crew swap a few weeks before.

“I am exceptionally proud of the entire team in Lancaster executing this interdiction on the first day of our deployment,” said Royal Navy Cmdr. Chris Sharp, HMS Lancaster’s commanding officer. “Complex interdictions in such a challenging environment require true teamwork across the entire ship's company. This success is shared with our partners in CTF 150 who provided essential support to the operation.”

Then, using Canadian space-based intelligence, the Sentinel-class fast-response cutter USCGC Clarence Sutphin Jr. (WPC 1147) seized 257 kg of methamphetamines, 92 kg of heroine, 17 kg of amphetamines, 296 kg of hashish, and 15 kg of marijuana from another dhow in the Arabian Sea. After weighing and documenting the hauls, the crew disposed of the narcotics.

Clarence Sutphin Jr is forward deployed to Bahrain as part of a contingent of U.S. Coast Guard ships under Patrol Forces Southwest Asia (PATFORSWA). PATFORSWA deploys Coast Guard personnel and ships alongside U.S. and regional naval forces throughout the Middle East.

“These two interdictions have made a significant dent in criminal and terrorist organizations’ ability to use drugs to fund their activities,” said Royal Canadian Navy Capt. Colin Matthews, Commander Combined Task Force 150. “The collaboration of our assets and personnel allowed us to become a precise and highly effective team that not only undermined the efforts of these organizations, but also nearly 2,000 kg of drugs from hitting the streets.”

Crimson Barracuda counters terrorist and criminal organizations’ use of the high seas to smuggle narcotics, weapons, and other illicit substances in the Indian Ocean, Arabian Sea and Gulf of Oman.

CTF 150 is one of five task forces under Combined Maritime Forces, the world’s largest international naval partnership. CTF 150’s mission is to deter and disrupt the ability of non-state actors to move weapons, drugs and other illicit substances in the Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea and the Gulf of Oman.

Combined Maritime Forces is a 42-nation naval partnership upholding the international rules-based order by promoting security and stability across 3.2 million square miles of water encompassing some of the world’s most important shipping lanes.
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1158 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To provide women and girls safe access to sanitation facilities 

in refugee camps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1158 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Refugee Sanitation Fa3 cility Safety Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SECURE ACCESS TO SANITATION FACILITIES FOR 

5 WOMEN AND GIRLS. 

6 Subsection (a) of section 501 of the Foreign Rela7 tions Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (22 

8 U.S.C. 2601 note) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (6) through 

10 (11) as paragraphs (7) through (12), respectively; 

11 and 

12 (2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the fol13 lowing new paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(6) the provision of safe and secure access to 

15 sanitation facilities, with a special emphasis on 

16 women, girls, and vulnerable populations.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIA QUINTERO CARRIZOZA DE 

HUNT,

 Petitioner,

 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

 Respondent.

No. 21-1399

Agency No. A037-803-362

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 14, 2023**

Phoenix, Arizona

Before: GOULD, HURWITZ, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Antonia Quintero Carrizoza de Hunt (“Carrizoza”) petitions for review of a 

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing her appeal from 

an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying protection under the Convention 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 18 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the 

petition for review.

1. Reviewing de novo, see Oshodi v. Holder, 729 F.3d 883, 889 (9th Cir. 

2013) (en banc), we reject Carrizoza’s claim that she was denied due process because 

the IJ declined to admit a police report and hospital records. To show a due process 

violation, Carrizoza must establish that (1) the proceeding was so fundamentally 

unfair that she was prevented from reasonably presenting her case and (2) the alleged 

violation may have affected the outcome of the proceeding. See Vilchez v. Holder, 

682 F.3d 1195, 1199 (9th Cir. 2012). That is not the case here. Carrizoza had almost 

three years after the remand to the IJ to obtain any relevant documentation but failed 

to seek the documents until thirty days before the merits hearing and did not submit 

them to the IJ until the day of the hearing. Moreover, although declining to admit 

the documents, the IJ allowed Carrizoza to testify about them and found her 

testimony credible.

2. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Carrizoza failed to show 

a likelihood of torture if removed. “In assessing whether it is more likely than not 

that an applicant would be tortured in the proposed country of removal,” an IJ should 

consider “evidence of past torture” and “evidence that the applicant could relocate 

to . . . where he or she is not likely to be tortured.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(3)(i)–(ii) 

(cleaned up). Although an attack by cartel members seriously injured Carrizoza, this 
3 

Court has previously held that even severe beatings do not compel a finding of 

torture. See Vitug v. Holder, 723 F.3d 1056, 1061, 1066 (9th Cir. 2013); Ahmed v. 

Keisler, 504 F.3d 1183, 1200–01 (9th Cir. 2007); Kumar v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1043, 

1047–48, 1055 (9th Cir. 2006). And the IJ reasonably found that Carrizoza could 

relocate in Mexico to avoid her attackers. See Tzompantzi-Salazar v. Garland, 32 

F.4th 696, 704–05 (9th Cir. 2022). Carrizoza lived without incident in Mexico for 

over six months after the attack, and her brother lives safely in a different part of 

Mexico.

PETITION DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certificationof**

**ChiefExecutive Officer**

**of TGCIndustries, Inc.**

**Pursuantto**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accompanies the annual reporton Form 10-K/A (the “Form 10-K/A”) for the fiscal year ended December 31,2009, of TGC Industries, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Wayne A. Whitener, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Form 10-K/A fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Form 10-K/Afairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as anexhibit to the Form 10-K/A pursuant to Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-Kand Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notincorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

 
| Date:  May 4, 2010 | By:                                    | /s/ Wayne A.  Whitener |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                    | Wayne A.  Whitener                     |
|                    | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                    | (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

1

----
United State Securities and Exchange Commission Edgar Filing


Exhibit 10.23




DUSKA THERAPEUTICS, INC.

AMENDMENT TO NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT (the Amendment") TO THE NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT (the "Original Agreement") dated as of the 26th day of September, 2007 by and between  Duska Therapeutics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), and James S. Kuo ("Optionee") is effective as of the 10th day of November, 2008. 

RECITAL

1. Pursuant to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") of the Company, the Optionee was issued a non- qualified stock option (the "Option") to purchase 2,249,102 shares of Common Stock of the Company at a price of $.75 per share upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement. 

2. The Option has vested with respect to 1,124,552 underlying shares of common stock. 

3. In order to reduce the number of the Company's issued and outstanding options, the Optionee has agreed to terminate the Option with respect to the unvested shares of common stock. 

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the undertakings of the parties hereto contained herein, it is hereby agreed: 

1. The portion of the Option with respect to the 1,124,551 underlying shares of common stock which has  not vested is terminated and Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to decrease the number of shares upon which the Option is exercisable from 2, 249,102 to 1,124,552 . 

2. All of the other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain the same. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. 

			
	 
	DUSKA THERAPEUTICS, INC. 


	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:

	/s/ Amir Pelleg, Ph.D.


	 
	 
	Name: Amir Pelleg, Ph. D.


	 
	 
	Title: President


	 
	 
	 

	 
	OPTIONEE


	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:

	/s/ James Kuo


	 
	 
	Dr. James Kuo


	 
	 
	1050 Scorlati Place


	 
	 
	La Jolla, CA 92037
# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 24-3082 September Term, 2024 1: 24-c r-001 21-CRC-1 Filed O n: Sep tem ber 9 , 20 24 United Sta tes o f

Am erica, App ellee
v . Ste phe n Micha el Ba ker, a lso kno w n a s Ste phe n B aker,

App ellant ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Mill ett, Pillard, a nd Pan , Circuit Jud ges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the m em oran da of law and fact f iled b y

the pa rties. T he court has det ermin ed tha t th e issue s prese nte d o ccasion no ne ed for an op inion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 3 6. It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s Ju ne 3, 2 024 , ord er den y ing app ellant ’s mo tion for recon siderat ion b e a f f irmed . T he district cou rt did not abu se its d iscretion in de nying tha t m otion . S ee United Sta tes v. T rabe lsi, 28 F.4th 129 1, 1 297 (D.C. Cir. 202 2). B ecau se a ppe llant failed to t ime ly argue t hatthe district court could no t im pose pret rial release con dition s w ithou t ho lding a d ete ntion he aring, we review

tha t argum entfor pla in error. See United Sta tes v. Hunt , 84 3 F.3 d 1 022 , 102 9 (D.C. Cir. 20 16). In tha t regard, t he district cou rt did notplain ly err be cause app ellantha s iden tif ied n o “con trolling preced enton the issue or som e o the r ‘abso lutely clear’ legal no rm.” Un ited Sta tes v. Pyles, 86 2 F.3 d 8 2, 8 8 (D.C. Cir. 20 17) (quotin g United Sta tes v. Nwoye, 66 3 F.3 d 4 60, 46 6 (D.C. Cir. 20 11)); se e a lso, e .g., Olm os v. Holder, 780 F.3d 13 13, 13 25 (10th Cir. 201 5) (not ing thatprose cuto rs ma y see k release con dition s “w ithou t a det ent ion h earing”); United Sta tes v. Fidler, 4 19 F.3d 102 6, 1 028 (9th Cir. 200 5) (per cu riam) (explaining tha t 18 U.S.C. § 3 142 (c), “w hich governs t he proce dure s for issuing a release orde r, do es n ot d irect th at a f ull he aring

# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 24-3082 September Term, 2024
followi ng the guideline s set outin § 31 42(f ) be held eith er be fore o r af ter th e rele ase orde r is issued ”). Nor did the district co urt clea rly err in m ainta ining the con dition s tha t app ellantno t po ssess a f irearm and tha t he no tif y the Pretrial S erv ices Agen cy be fore traveling to W ashin gton, D.C. Se e Unite d S tate s v. Hale-Cusane lli, 3 F.4 th 4 49, 454 –55 (D.C. Cir. 202 1). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter th e resolut ion o f

an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P . 41 (b); D.C. Cir. Rule 4 1. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
Jean JAMISON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2953

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 25, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The appellant's petition for all writs, treated within this appeal as a motion to compel, is denied. This appeal is dismissed for the appellant's failure to provide an appealable final order. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant to seek the issuance of a final order by filing a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 National Science Foundation
 In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting: NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: MRSEC—UCSD 2nd Year Virtual Site Visit (1203).
 DATE AND TIME: April 27, 2022; 9:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
 PLACE: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 | Virtual.
 TYPE OF MEETING: Part-Open.
 CONTACT PERSON: Dr. Miriam Deutsch, Program Director, Division of Materials Research, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room W 9216, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: (703) 292-5360.
 PURPOSE OF MEETING: Virtual site visit to provide an evaluation of the progress of the projects at the host site for the Division of Materials Research at the National Science Foundation.
 AGENDA:
 May 27, 2022
9:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m
Brief Charge to Panel
CLOSED.10:00 a.m.-10:10 a.m
Introduction
OPEN.10:10 a.m.-10:55 a.m
Director's Overview
OPEN.10:55 a.m.-11:10 a.m
Discussion/Questions
OPEN.11:10 a.m.-11:30 a.m
IRG-1 Presentation
OPEN.11:30 a.m.-11:35 a.m
Discussion/Questions
OPEN.11:35 a.m.-11:45 a.m
Break
OPEN.11:45 a.m.-12:05 p.m
IRG-2 Presentation
OPEN.12:05 p.m.-12:10 p.m
Discussion/Questions
OPEN12:10 p.m.-12:35 p.m
Education and Outreach, Diversity Plan
OPEN.12:35 p.m.-12:45 p.m
Discussion/Questions
OPEN.12:45 p.m.-01:30 p.m
Working Lunch
CLOSED.01:30 p.m.-02:30 p.m
Poster Session
OPEN.02:30 p.m.-02:45 p.m
Site Visit Discussion
OPEN.02:45 p.m.-03:30 p.m
Executive Session
CLOSED.03:30 p.m.-04:00 p.m
Debriefing
OPEN.04:00 p.m
Adjourn
 REASON FOR CLOSING: The work being reviewed during closed portions of the virtual site visit include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the project. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
 Dated: January 14, 2022. Crystal Robinson, Committee Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 2022-01100 Filed 1-20-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
NO. 07-08-0369-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	NOVEMBER 26, 2008

	______________________________

	IN RE N&T SPECIALTY WELDING & MANUFACTURING, RELATOR

	_________________________________

Before CAMPBELL, HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ORDER

	Relator’s, N & T Specialty Welding & Manufacturing, Inc., Petition for Writ of Mandamus is hereby denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d).  In addition, our previous Order on Relator’s Motion for Temporary Relief is hereby vacated.

	Per Curiam
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, that:



|(1) | The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                   
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2009 |  |                                   
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Stryker Warren, Jr.           
|                        |  | Stryker Warren, Jr.               
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer           
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Rebecca J. Weber              
|                        |  | Rebecca J. Weber                  
|                        |  | Controller and Director of Finance
Exhibit 24.4

STATE OF ARKANSAS      §
COUNTY OF BENTON      §

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know
all men by these presents, that I, WILLIAM A. SWANSTON, a Director of AMERICAS
CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM H.
HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for AMERICAS CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30,
2008 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits
thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf
and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual
Report, incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their
substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

In
witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of July,
2008.

|                          | 
|------------------------- | 
|/s/ William
  A. Swanston | 
|                          | 
|WILLIAM A.
  SWANSTON     | 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Before
me this 3rd day of July, 2008, came WILLIAM A. SWANSTON, personally known to
me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of
Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Camille
  A. Hector | 
|                        | 
|NOTARY
  PUBLIC         | 

69

---
EXHIBIT 4.3


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL
INDENTURE dated as of December 1, 2008, between Globalstar, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”)
and U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee (the “Trustee”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, this Amendment No. 1 amends the
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 15, 2008, which is
supplemental to the Original Indenture; and


 


WHEREAS, the Indenture (including this
Amendment No. 1) governs the Company’s 5.75% Convertible Senior Notes due
2028 (the “Securities”); and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.02(a),
the Company and the Trustee may amend or supplement the Indenture to supplement
any provision in the Indenture so long as the interests of Holders of Securities
are not adversely affected in any respect under the Indenture; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish to make an
amendment to the Indenture that does not adversely effect the interests of
Holders of Securities.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FIRST
SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE WITNESSETH:


 


The Company and the Trustee agree for the
equal and proportionate benefit of the respective holders from time to time of
the Securities, as follows:


 


Section 1.01.  Definitions.  All terms not defined herein shall have the
same meaning herein as in the First Supplemental Indenture.


 


Section 1.02.  Amendment.  A new second sentence shall be added to Section 9.03(c) of
the First Supplemental Indenture to state as follows:


 


Provided, however, that with the consent of
any Holder who converts Securities prior to April 11, 2011, the Company
may deliver the cash with respect to any Early Conversion Make Whole Amount
pursuant to Section 9.06 on or before the Settlement Date.


 


[Remainder
of the page intentionally left blank]


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused
this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed as of the date first written
above.


 


 


	
   

  	
  GLOBALSTAR,
  INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Fuad Ahmad

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Fuad Ahmad

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Senior Vice President &
  Chief Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  U.S.
  BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Daniel Boyers

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Daniel Boyers

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: 

  	
  Assistant Vice President
James PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2484

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.