alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Abatement Order filed January 24, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01052-CV

____________

ESTATE OF FLOYD E. DIXON, DECEASED, Appellant

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 377,211

ABATEMENT ORDER

The reporter’s record was filed in this appeal on December 18, 2012. Sarah 

J. Gaines, the official court reporter for Probate Court No. 4, has informed this 

court that her certification by the Court Reporters’ Certification Board lapsed 

effective January 1, 2011. Until such time as she can be reinstated by the Board, 

the court has appointed a successor official court reporter to act in her stead and 

certify, if necessary the reporter’s record in this cause. Accordingly, we issue the 

following order:

The trial court is directed to conduct a hearing to determine whether the 

parties can agree that the record filed on December 18, 2012 can be certified by the 
successor official court reporter. The court is directed to reduce its findings to 

writing and to have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed 

with the clerk of this court, together with a reporter’s record from the hearing, 

within 30 days of the date of this order. In the event the court determines the 

record can be certified by the successor court reporter, such certification shall be 

filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or 

the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any 

party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to 

schedule a hearing in compliance with this court=s order. If the parties do not 

request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date 

and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
Second Amendment to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.44 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC. 
 EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) to the Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan (“Plan”) made effective as of the
30th day of December 2008 by Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (“Company”). All capitalized terms in this Amendment not otherwise defined shall have their respective meanings under the Plan. 
 WHEREAS, the Company wishes to further amend and conform the written terms of the Plan to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”), and 
 WHEREAS, the Plan has operated in good faith compliance with the requirements of
Section 409A of the Code for periods starting January 1, 2005 and through the effective date of this Amendment, 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
the Company hereby adopts this Amendment upon the following terms and conditions: 
 1. The definition of Change in Control in
Section 1.07 shall be replaced in its entirety with the following definition: 
 The term “Change in Control” is hereby defined as the date that (i) any one person, or more than one person, acting as a group, acquires ownership of stock of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. that, together with stock held by
such person or group constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., (b) during any period of twelve consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of such
period constituted the Board and any new directors, whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least three-fourths ( 3
/4ths) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was
previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board, or (c) during any period of twelve consecutive months, (i) any one person, or more than one person, acting as a group, acquires ownership of stock of
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. that, together with stock held by such person or group constitutes more than 30% of the total voting power of the stock of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., and (ii) individuals who at the beginning of such period
constituted the Board cease in connection with such 30% change in voting stock ownership, cease to constitute a majority of the Board. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, the definition of “Change in Control” shall be
interpreted so as to comply with the terms of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder. 







 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 







 WITNESS the signature of the undersigned officer of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 
  

	
	HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
	
	  

	Jack W. Gibson, Vice Chairman, President & CEO
	
	  

	Date Signed
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with this quarterly report of Nanophase Technologies Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jess A. Jankowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Frank J. Cesario, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 9, 2010



| |  |  |  |  |  |                                          
| |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
| |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ JESS A. JANKOWSKI                    
| |  |  |  |  |  | Jess A. Jankowski Chief
Executive Officer
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ FRANK J. CESARIO                     
| |  |  |  |  |  | Frank J. Cesario Chief
Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6492

JOHN DINO MARTIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY GENERAL; JOHN DOE, 1-5,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CA-96-159-5)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Dino Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn

Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Charleston, West Virginia; Patrick Michael Flatley, Assistant

United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion

for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Martin v. West Virginia, No. CA96-159-5 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
SERVED: MARCH 19, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF EXECUTIVE FLITEWAYS, INC.

DOCKETNO. FAA-2013-1085 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012S0950377) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List. _./
..-·-,**,.~,,r•**

Attachment

- Service List _/ / '-.
....

### ,..,.------··· ,.--- 

### . onnie A. Yoder / Chief

### Administrat~.fe Law Judge 

### // /

...... // (_,.-/ ,/7 I

### ·DocketNo. FAA-2013-1085 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1

. ONECOPY 

### John

### W. Grillo, President Executive Fliteways, Inc., Respondent 

### One ClarkDrive Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 Kenneth S. Gray, Respondent's Representative 

### Director ofOperations, Executive Fliteways, Inc. One Clark Drive Ronkonkoma,,NY 11779 TEL: 631-588-3480 ext. 128 FPC(: 631-588-5527 Michael F. McKinley, Complainant's Counsel 

### Senior Attorney, Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-7100 FPC(: 202-267-5106 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FPC(: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
EX-4.22






Exhibit 4.22




CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

TO

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

FIRST MERCHANTS CAPITAL TRUST III




          THIS Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Trust of First Merchants Capital Trust III
(the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned trustee to amend the Certificate
of Trust of the Trust which was filed on December 12, 2001 (the “Certificate of Trust”), with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del.
C. § 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”).





	 	1.	 	Name. The name of the statutory trust is First
Merchants Capital Trust III.
	 
	 	2.	 	Amendment of Trust. The Certificate of Trust of the
Trust is hereby amended by changing the name and business address of the
trustee of the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of
Delaware to: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, 300 Delaware Avenue,
9th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate Trust
Group.
	 
	 	3.	 	Effective Date. This Certificate of Amendment shall
be effective upon filing.





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned trustee of the Trust has duly executed this Certificate of
Amendment in accordance with Section 3811 of the Act.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, not in its
individual
capacity but solely as Trustee

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Annette E. Morgan
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Annette E. Morgan 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Assistant Vice President
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00182-CV 

ROLAND COIT APPELLANT

V.

JEFF TRAUTVETTER APPELLEE 

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-002508-1

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 30, 2014, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed 

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless 

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within 

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J. 

DELIVERED: December 11, 2014
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              CYTRX CORPORATION
                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Percentage
          Name of Subsidiary      State of Incorporation  of Ownership
          ----------------------  ----------------------  ------------
          <S>                           <C>                    <C>   
          Custom Adjuvants, Inc.        Georgia                100%  
                                                                     
          Proceutics, Inc.              Delaware               100%  
                                                                     
          Vetlife, Inc.                 Delaware               100%  
                                                                     
          Vaxcel, Inc.                  Delaware               100%  
                                                                     
</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: February 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 25)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 6095]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08fe10-5]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0960; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-29]

 
Revocation of Class E Airspace; Hinesville, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error in the effective date of a final 
rule that was published in the Federal Register on November 25, 2009, 
Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-29.

DATES: Effective Date: 0900 UTC, February 11, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    Federal Register Docket No. FAA-2009-0960, Airspace Docket No. 09-
ASO-29, published on November 25, 2009 (74 FR 61507), revokes Class E 
airspace at Liberty County Airport, Hinesville, GA. A typographical 
error was made in the effective date. It should read February 11, 2010, 
not February 22, 2010. This action corrects that error.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, on page 
61508, column 1, line 1, the DATES section is corrected to read: 
Effective Date: 0900 UTC, February 11, 2010.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 26, 2010.
Myron A. Jenkins,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air 
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-2520 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
**Exhibit 10.21**

 

**WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE**

**OF**

**NEW WORLD BRANDS, INC.**

 

Effective as of July 21, 2009 (the “effective date”).

 

Theundersigned, being all of the members of the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”)of New World Brands, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the “Corporation”or “NWB”), consent to the corporate actions specified below and adopt thefollowing decision by written consent pursuant to Sec. 141 (f) of theDelaware General Corporation Law:

 

WHEREASit is in the best interests of the Corporation and has been agreed to issueoptions to various employees and individuals who meet the following criteria topurchase shares of company stock on the terms and conditions set forth in the Companystock option plan issued in February 2008. Those officers, directors,managerial professional or administrative employees of, and consultants andadvisors to, the Company who have been working for the Company from July 1,2008 through April 1, 2009, shall be entitled to receive options to purchasea number of shares equal to half of the dollar amount stated to have beenearned by such worker on their 2008 W-2 form.

 

NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that effective on this date, the Corporation ishereby authorized by us, the undersigned committee members, to engage in thetransaction described in the attached documents, and to take all actionsnecessary and prudent for the issuance of the options described herein.

 

Thiswritten consent may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemedto part of one and the same original instrument.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Written Consent as of thedate set forth herein.

 

 
|                 |   |
|----------------------|--------|
| M.  David Kamrat     |   |
|                 |   |
|                 |   |
| Shehryar  Wahid      |   |
|                 |   |
|                 |   |
| Selvin  Passen, M.D. |   |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of**

**Chief Financial Officer of**

**TGC Industries, Inc.**

**Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

This certification isfurnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code) and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K(the “Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, of TGCIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”). I, James K. Brata, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifythat, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Form 10-K fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuantto Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| Date:  March 16, 2010 | By:    |    /s/ James K. Brata               |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | James K. Brata                                |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer                       |
|                       |   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

1

----
Ronald H. BENNETT, et al. v. ETHYL CORPORATION, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-0593

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Denied.
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Enigma Software Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
      M. Scarlata ,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard
      M. Scarlata


Chief
      Financial Officer


April
      10,
      2006
Alexius Rhamon FOSTER v. STATE

CR-15-0435

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 75 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10 (legislative day, MARCH 7), 2022 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2022, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2022 (division 

4 A of Public Law 117–43) is further amended— 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 75 RDS 

1 (1) by striking the date specified in section 

2 106(3) and inserting ‘‘March 15, 2022’’; and 

3 (2) in section 163, by striking ‘‘$300,000,000’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘$500,000,000’’. 

5 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY ORDER FOR 

6 FENTANYL-RELATED SUBSTANCES. 

7 Effective as if included in the enactment of the Tem8 porary Reauthorization and Study of the Emergency 

9 Scheduling of Fentanyl Analogues Act (Public Law 116– 

10 114), section 2 of such Act (as amended by Public Law 

11 117–86) is amended by striking ‘‘March 11, 2022’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘March 15, 2022’’. 

13 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Extension 

14 of Continuing Appropriations Act, 2022’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 9, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 

By KEVIN MCCUMBER, 

Deputy Clerk. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS