Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 37105 

Background 

On May 21, 2013, the FAA published 

a final rule in the Federal Register 

establishing five RNAV routes in the 

Washington, DC area (78 FR 29615). 

Subsequent to publication, it was 

determined that the name of the 

MORTY, MD WP (which is common to 

the legal descriptions of RNAV routes 

T–291 and T–295) needs to be changed 

due to its proximity to a similar 

sounding and spelled fix, MORTO. 

Potential safety concerns were 

identified due to the possibility for 

confusion of the points in radio 

communications and onboard Flight 

Management System data entry. To 

resolve this concern, the FAA is 

changing the name ‘‘MORTY, MD’’ to 

‘‘BAABS, MD’’ in the descriptions of T– 

291 and T–295. This is a name change 

only. The latitude/longitude coordinates 

remain the same. 

Area Navigation Routes are published 

in paragraph 6011 of FAA Order 

7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012, and 

effective September 15, 2012, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The RNAV routes listed in this 

document will be published 

subsequently in the Order. 

Correction to Final Rule 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the name 

‘‘MORTY, MD WP’’ as published in the 

Federal Register on May 21, 2013 (78 

FR 29615; FR Doc. 2013–11969) for 

RNAV routes T–291 and T–295, is 

corrected under the descriptions as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6011—United States Area 

Navigation Routes 

* * * * * 

T–291 [Corrected] 

On page 29616, line 36, Remove ‘‘MORTY, 

MD WP (Lat. 39°19′51′′ N., long. 076°24′41′′ 

W.)’’ and insert ‘‘BAABS, MD WP (Lat. 

39°19′51′′ N., long. 076°24′41′′ W.)’’ 

T–295 [Corrected] 

On page 29616. Line 40, Remove ‘‘MORTY, 

MD WP (Lat. 39°19′51′′ N., long. 076°24′41′′ 

W.)’’ and insert ‘‘BAABS, MD WP (Lat. 

39°19′51′′ N., long. 076°24′41′′ W.)’’ 

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 13, 

2013. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC 

Procedures Group. 

[FR Doc. 2013–14658 Filed 6–19–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2012–0971; Airspace 

Docket No. 12–ASO–31] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Modification of VOR Federal Airway 

V–537, GA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action modifies VHF 

omnidirectional range (VOR) Federal 

airway V–537 in Georgia due to the 

scheduled decommissioning of the 

Moultrie, GA, VOR/DME navigation aid 

which currently forms a point along the 

route. 

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, August 

22, 2013. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under 1 CFR part 51, 

subject to the annual revision of FAA 

Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace Policy and ATC 

Procedures Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On October 15, 2012, the FAA 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

to modify V–537 in Georgia (77 FR 

62468). Interested parties were invited 

to participate in this rulemaking effort 

by submitting written comments on this 

proposal to the FAA. No comments 

were received. 

Subsequently, a flight inspection was 

conducted to evaluate the usability of 

the proposed amended portion of V– 

537. That flight inspection found a 

portion of the originally proposed route 

amendment to be unsatisfactory. 

Specifically, a radial from the Macon, 

GA, VORTAC that had been planned to 

form an intersection along the route 

between the Greenville, FL, VORTAC 

and the Macon, GA, VORTAC, did not 

pass the expanded service volume 

validation. After considering other 

alternatives, the FAA opted to propose 

terminating V–537 at the Greenville 

VORTAC and eliminate the segment 

between Greenville and Macon. The 

FAA issued a supplemental NPRM 

(SNPRM) (78 FR 21856, April 12, 2013) 

to reopen the comment period and 

solicit comments on the proposed 

further modification of V–537. No 

comments were received in response the 

SNPRM. 

The Rule 

The FAA is amending Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 

to modify VOR Federal airway V–537 

due to the scheduled decommissioning 

of the Moultrie, GA, VOR/DME, which 

currently forms a point along the route. 

This action modifies V–537 by 

eliminating the route segments between 

the Greenville, FL, VORTAC and the 

Macon, GA, VORTAC. The modified V– 

537 extends between Palm Beach, FL, 

and Greenville, FL. 

VOR Federal airways are published in 

paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order 

7400.9W signed August 8, 2012 and 

effective September 15, 2012, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The VOR Federal airway listed in 

this document will be published 

subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it modifies a VOR Federal airway to 

enhance the efficiency of the National 

Airspace System in the southeast United 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

37106 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

1See HUD rules published on December 1, 2003, 

at 68 FR 67316, and on September 13, 2005, at 70 

FR 54200. 

States. Except for editorial changes, this 

rulemaking is the same as published in 

the SNPRM. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: 

Policies and Procedures, paragraph 

311a. This airspace action is not 

expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p.389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the FAA Order 7400.9W, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, signed August 8, 2012, and 

effective September 15, 2012, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal 

Airways 

* * * * * 

V–537 [Amended] 

From Palm Beach, FL; INT Palm Beach 

356° and Treasure, FL, 143° radials; Treasure; 

INT Treasure 318° and Orlando. FL, 140° 

radials; INT Orlando 140° and Melbourne, FL 

298° radials; INT Melbourne 298° and Ocala, 

FL 145° radials; Ocala; Gators, FL; to 

Greenville, FL. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 13, 

2013. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC 

Procedures Group. 

[FR Doc. 2013–14660 Filed 6–19–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

24 CFR Part 891 

[Docket No. FR–5167–F–02] 

RIN 2502–AI67 

Streamlining Requirements Governing 

the Use of Funding for Supportive 

Housing for the Elderly and Persons 

With Disabilities Programs 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary of Housing—Federal Housing 

Commissioner, HUD. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This final rule amends HUD’s 

regulations governing the Section 202 

Supportive Housing for the Elderly 

Program (Section 202) and the Section 

811 Supportive Housing for Persons 

with Disabilities Program (Section 811) 

to streamline the requirements 

applicable to Section 202 and Section 

811 mixed-finance developments. This 

rule removes restrictions on the portions 

of developments not funded through 

capital advances, lifts barriers on 

participation in the development of the 

projects, and eliminates burdensome 

funding requirements. These changes 

are anticipated to attract private capital 

and the expertise of the private 

developer community to create 

attractive and affordable supportive 

housing developments for the elderly 

and for persons with disabilities. 

Through this rule, HUD also brings upto-date certain regulations governing all 

Section 202 and Section 811 

developments, not solely mixed-finance 

developments. Overall, the changes 

made by this rule permit greater 

flexibility in the design of Section 202/ 

811 units, and extend the duration of 

the availability of capital advance funds. 

This final rule is part of a larger effort 

to reform the Section 202 and Section 

811 programs, which will include 

implementation of the changes made to 

these programs by the Frank Melville 

Supportive Housing Investment Act of 

2010 and the Section 202 Supportive 

Housing for the Elderly Act of 2010. A 

subsequent rule, which will focus on 

the statutory changes that require 

rulemaking for implementation, is 

expected to be published in 2013. 

DATES: Effective Date: July 22, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Aretha Williams, Office of Housing 

Assistance and Grant Administration, 

Office of Housing, Department of 

Housing and Urban Development, 451 

7th Street SW., Room 6136, Washington, 

DC 20410–8000; telephone number 202– 

708–3000 (this is not a toll-free 

number). Persons with hearing or 

speech impairments may access this 

number via TTY by calling the toll-free 

Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Executive Summary 

A. Purpose of the Regulatory Action 

The regulatory amendments made by 

this rule are designed to provide greater 

flexibility in the design, construction, 

and management of Section 202/811 

mixed-finance developments, to 

increase such development. The Section 

202/811 mixed-finance program, 

established by interim and final rules 

issued in 2003 and 2005,1 allows for the 

participation of the private developer 

community, leveraging their capital and 

expertise, to create attractive and 

affordable supportive housing 

developments for the elderly or persons 

with disabilities. In light of the current 

housing market, with limited private 

financing for the development of 

supportive housing, this rule 

streamlines requirements pertaining to 

mixed-finance developments to attract 

private capital for the development of 

mixed-finance housing. This rule allows 

for more flexibility in such areas as the 

drawdown of capital advance funds and 

noncapital advance funds and removes 

certain restrictions relating to 

noncapital advance funds. In addition, 

this rule would update certain 

regulations governing all Section 202 

and Section 811 developments, which 

have not been updated since 2005, to 

conform to changes in law, policy, and 

practices that affect these developments. 

B. Summary of the Major Provisions of 

the Regulatory Action 

This final rule updates the regulations 

governing mixed-finance developments 

for the Section 202 and Section 811 

programs. This rule amends several 

definitions used in the mixed-finance 

development program, based on changes 

to these terms made by the Frank 

Melville Supportive Housing 

Investment Act of 2010 and the Section 

202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly 

Act of 2010. These changes lessen 

restrictions with respect to who can be 

an owner. In addition, this rule removes 

the restriction on using HUD funds for 

certain amenities, exempts contracts for 

sale of land between owner and sponsor 

from conflict of interest provisions, 

clarifies what constitutes substantial 

rehabilitation, requires smoke detectors 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES