alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 96 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 96

     Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate America's 
commitment to a free press by honoring journalists who sacrificed their 
                    lives in service to that cause.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2022

  Mrs. Napolitano (for herself and Mr. Cole) submitted the following 
   joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
     Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate America's 
commitment to a free press by honoring journalists who sacrificed their 
                    lives in service to that cause.

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code, provides that the 
        location of a commemorative work in Area I, as depicted on the map 
        entitled ``Commemorative Areas Washington, DC and Environs'', numbered 
        869/86501 B, and dated June 24, 2003, shall be deemed to be authorized 
        only if a recommendation for the location is approved by law not later 
        than 150 calendar days after the date on which Congress is notified of 
        the recommendation;
Whereas Public Law 116-253 authorized the Fallen Journalists Memorial Foundation 
        to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia to 
        commemorate America's commitment to a free press by honoring journalists 
        who sacrificed their lives in service to that cause; and
Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress of the determination 
        of the Secretary of the Interior that the memorial should be located in 
        area I: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the location of a 
commemorative work to commemorate America's commitment to a free press 
by honoring journalists who sacrificed their lives in service to that 
cause within Area I, as depicted on the map entitled ``Commemorative 
Areas Washington, DC and Environs'', numbered 869/86501 B, and dated 
June 24, 2003, is approved.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Chief Financial Officer
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of CytRx Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies
that:
 
 (i) the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
 
 (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
      March 12, 2010
              By:
              /s/ JOHN
      Y. CALOZJohn
      Y. CalozChief
      Financial Officer
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to CytRx Corporation and will be retained by CytRx Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an Exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-K.
<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
_____________________

FORM 10-Q

[ X ]  Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996

or

[   ]Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 
For the transition period from ___________________ to
__________________


Commission File Number 0-19847


FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



California                              95-2960716
(State or other jurisdiction            (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or
Identification No.) organization)





3230 Fallow Field Drive
Diamond Bar, California 91765
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(909) 595-1996
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

YES  X                       NO____

As of June 30, 1996, 5,883,117 shares of the registrant's common stock were
outstanding.

<PAGE>
SIGNATURES


    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
                                    FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Date:  August 12, 1996               By  S/Clement Ziroli
                                         Clement Ziroli
                                         Chairman of the Board of
                                         Directors,
                                         Chief Executive Officer



Date:  August 12, 1996

                                     By S/Pac W. Dong
                                        Pac W. Dong
                                        Chief Financial Officer, 
                                        Controller and
                                        Executive Vice
                                        President
Michele MILLAN, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Estaban MILLAN, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Case No. 2D16-2467

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

Marsha Sutherland Pullen of Sutherland Pullen Law, PLLC, Naples, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Esteban Millan, pro se.

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

In this appeal and cross-appeal from the final order in these postdissolution modification and contempt proceedings, we affirm in all respects save one. During the parties' long-term marriage, the former wife suffered a stroke from which she suffers a permanent impairment and ongoing health issues that significantly hinder her ability to maintain employment. In light of the former wife's severely diminished financial capability-which is exacerbated by the ordered reduction in her ongoing alimony income-the circuit court abused its discretion by giving retroactive effect to *914the alimony modification so as to charge her with an obligation resulting from past overpayments by the former husband. *See**Gurdian v. Gurdian*, 198 So.3d 65, 68-69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). Insofar as the order modifies the former husband's alimony obligation retroactively, it is reversed. The order is otherwise affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

KELLY and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Retention Bonus Letter - William C. Houghton



 Exhibit 10.84 
 

 
 Delivered in Person 
 February 25, 2009 
 William Houghton 
 Dear Bill:

 As you know, given the macro economic climate and resulting impact on company operations, many corporations have scaled back and even
eliminated 2008 bonus programs as was the decision by Anesiva’s Board of Directors. However, in recognition of the continued commitment of its people to the success of the company, the Board has adopted a retention bonus plan for 2009. Anesiva,
Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to offer you an initial bonus payment in the amount equal to Thirty-three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-three Dollars ($33,333.00) to be earned and payable on March 1, 2009. Additional stay bonuses are
planned for May and June under similar terms subject to subsequent Board approval. 
 In the event that you voluntarily resign from
employment with the Company before May 1, 2009, you agree that you will repay to the Company this retention bonus amount paid to you pursuant to this letter. Any repayment under this paragraph must be repaid within thirty (30) days
following your last date of employment with the Company. In the event that you are involuntarily terminated from employment with the Company, you will not be liable for repayment of the retention bonus. 
 As a reminder, your employment with the Company continues to be “at will,” as described in your original Offer Letter. This retention bonus and
letter does not change any other terms of your Offer Letter. 
 We hope that you find the foregoing terms acceptable. Please indicate your
agreement with these terms by signing and dating below. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Michael L. Kranda
	 Michael L. Kranda
 President and Chief Executive
Officer



 I have read, accept and agree to, the terms of this agreement. 
  

					
	/s/ William C. Houghton	 		 	2/26/2009
	Name	 		 	Date

 HEADQUARTERS: 
 650 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 • PHONE (650) 624-9600 • FAX (650) 624-7540 
 WWW.ANESIVA.COM
# USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) departs for sixth patrol

## From USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) Public Affairs 

The ship and her crew will begin this patrol by crossing the Strait of Gibraltar and operating in the Mediterranean Sea, in support of U.S. Sixth Fleet tasking.

“Roosevelt’s crew is excited to get underway and get back to sea where we belong,” said Cmdr. Jeffrey Chewning, Commanding Officer of Roosevelt. “We look forward to executing the mission we’ve been given over the next several months.”

Roosevelt completed her fifth FDNF-E patrol in November 2023. The fifth patrol took the ship and her crew throughout the Mediterranean Sea and across the Sixth Fleet area of operations. While in the Med, Roosevelt integrated with the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group, supporting security and stability in the region.

While on patrol in the Baltic in the summer of 2023, Roosevelt participated in NATO’s enhanced vigilance activity (eVA) Neptune Strike 23-2 and operated with NATO Allied Maritime Command’s Standing NATO Maritime Group One (SNMG-1), demonstrating increased interoperability with NATO allies and partners. 

Roosevelt was also the first American warship to conduct a Naval Surface Fire Support live fire exercise off the coast of Latvia.

Roosevelt is one of four U.S. Navy destroyers based in Rota, Spain, and assigned to Commander, Task Force 65 in support of NATO’s Integrated Air Missile Defense architecture. These FDNF-E ships have the flexibility to operate throughout the waters of Europe and Africa, from the Cape of Good Hope to the Arctic Circle, demonstrating their mastery of the maritime domain.

For more than 80 years, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-U.S. Naval Forces Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) has forged strategic relationships with our Allies and partners, leveraging a foundation of shared values to preserve security and stability.

Headquartered in Naples, Italy, NAVEUR-NAVAF operates U.S. naval forces in the U.S. European  Command (USEUCOM) and U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) areas of responsibility. U.S. Sixth Fleet is permanently assigned to NAVEUR-NAVAF, and employs maritime forces through the full spectrum of joint and naval operations.
FOIA Requested Record #J-14-0104 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 10 of 23










FOIA Requested Record #J-14-0104 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 21 of 23

FOIA Requested Record #J-14-0104 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 23 of 23
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 1, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-51021 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANGEL OMAR GARCIA-TEJEDA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-2052-1-DB

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Angel Omar Garcia-Tejeda appeals his convictions for conspiracy to commit robbery and interference with commerce by robbery and aiding and abetting. Garcia-Tejeda was sentenced to terms of imprisonment of 60 months and 135 months, the terms to run concurrently. Garcia-Tejeda argues that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing a juror and replacing him with an alternate juror during the trial. The district court dismissedNo. 03-51021 -2- the tardy juror so that the trial could proceed as scheduled. Avoiding further delays inconveniencing the court and the numerous individuals involved in the case was a sound reason for dismissing the juror. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the juror. United States v. Rodriguez , 573 F.2d 330, 332 (5th Cir. 1978). Garcia also argues that the district court erred in failing to conduct a hearing on his post-trial request that new counsel be appointed to represent him at sentencing. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during the proceedings. Review of whether the district court erred in summarily denying Garcia-Tejeda’s motion for new counsel would in effect result in this court determining counsel’s effectiveness during the trial without the development of the record. The court has determined that such review is improper. See United States v. Gordon , 346 F.3d 135, 136-37 (5th Cir. 2003). If Garcia-Tejeda wishes to challenge the effectiveness of his trial counsel, he should present his claims in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Massaro v. United States , 538 U.S. 500, 504 (2003). It was not necessary for the district court to conduct a hearing on the motion because it had observed counsel during the trial and, thus, in denying the motion, it implicitly found that counsel’s representation was effective and that there was no basis for appointing new counsel for sentencing. Further, ifNo. 03-51021 -3- there was any error in addressing the motion, it was harmless because Garcia-Tejeda has not shown that counsel committed any errors that prejudiced him at sentencing. The district court’s denial of the motion for appointment of new counsel was not an abuse of discretion. Garcia-Tejeda’s conviction is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                UROLOGIX, INC.
          COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      Three Months Ended                Six Months Ended,
                                          December 31,                     December 31,   
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------
                                       1997          1996             1997            1996
<S>                              <C>             <C>              <C>              <C>  
Net loss                          ($2,140,307)   ($1,597,448)     ($4,155,967)     ($3,387,133)
                                 ============    ===========      ===========      ===========
Weighted average common                     
  shares outstanding               10,140,194      9,148,655        9,725,045        9,139,732
                                 ============    ===========      ===========      ===========
Basic and diluted net                       
  loss per common share                ($0.21)        ($0.17)          ($0.43)          ($0.37)  
                                 ============    ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### F AA - 2012 - 1 2 74 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 4 2 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Randi BLUMENTHAL-GUIGUI, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Marc GIDNEY, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1657

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 15, 2017

Following review of the petition for writ of prohibition, and the responses and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied without prejudice to seek a stay from the trial court of the trial court's order submitting the parties to mediation until resolution of the petitioner's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02515]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Proposed Collection of Information: Claims Against the United 
States for Amounts Due in the Case of a Deceased Creditor

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Currently the Bureau of the Fiscal 
Service within the Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments 
concerning Claims Against the United States for Amounts Due in the Case 
of a Deceased Creditor.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 11, 2022 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments and requests for additional 
information to Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Bruce A. Sharp, Room 
#4006-A, P.O. Box 1328, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328, or 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Claims Against the United States for Amounts Due in the Case 
of a Deceased Creditor.
    OMB Number: 1530-0004.
    Form Number: SF-1055.
    Abstract: The information is required to determine who is entitled 
to funds of a deceased Postal Savings depositor or deceased award 
holder. The form properly completed with supporting documents enables 
the Judgement Fund Branch to decide who is legally entitled to payment.
    Current Actions: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 400.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 27 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 180.
    Request for Comments: Comments submitted in response to this notice 
will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All 
comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited 
on: 1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether 
the information shall have practical utility; 2. the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information; 3. 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; 4. ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and 5. 
estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, 
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.

     Dated: February 2, 2022.
Bruce A. Sharp,
Bureau Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-02515 Filed 2-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P
```
EX-10.35







Exhibit
10.35



June 5, 2008




Altis Partners (Jersey) Limited

Charles House, 2nd Floor

Charles Street

St Helier, Jersey

Channel Islands JE 2 4SF




Attention: Mr. Stephen Hedgecock




     Re: Management Agreement Renewals


Dear Mr. Hedgecock:



We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2009 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.





	 	•	 	CTA Capital LLC
	 
	 	•	 	Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Altis Partners Master Fund L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P.
	 
	 	•	 	Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.




Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it
to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer Magro
 

Jennifer Magro
	 	 
	 

	 	Chief Financial Officer & Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	                                                       
	By:

	 	/s/ Reeve Gray
 

	 	 
	Print Name: Reeve Gray	 	 
	                                                        
	 
	 	 	 	 
	JM/sr