alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT T0SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of ERHC Energy Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Peter Ntephe , Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   Peter Ntephe


Peter Ntephe


Chief  Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer


July 8, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell Lynn HENDERSON Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-12383 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Filed (January 27, 2017)

Adam W. Overstreet, Michael David Anderson, Kenyen Ray Brown, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee

Darrell Lynn Henderson, Talladega, AL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before MARCUS, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur T. Powell, appointed counsel for Darrell Henderson in this revocation of supervised release appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of *970the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Henderson’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Urologix, Inc. I,
Christopher R. Geyen, Chief Financial Officer of Urologix, Inc., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     .    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     .    The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Urologix, Inc.

Date:  November 13, 2002               /s/ Christopher R. Geyen
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Christopher R. Geyen
                                       Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
SUBJ: Airport Deicing Rule ‐ Meeting with ACI and ATA

FROM: Jan Matuszko

TO: Record

DATE: 9/1/11

At the request of the Airports Council International‐North America (ACI) and the Air Transport

Association (ATA), on August 31, 2011, Nancy Stoner, Acting Assistant Administrator for the Office of

Water met with representatives of ACI and ATA to discuss the Airport Deicing Effluent Limitation

Guideline (ELG) rulemaking.  See attachment A for a list of the attendees.

ACI and ATA discussed some of the overarching concerns they had with the proposed rule.  They

indicated their concerns were specific to the aircraft deicing requirements and not the airfield pavement

deicing requirements.  These concerns included:

 They do not believe there is a need for this ELG, as the industry has been working towards

reducing their discharges, and where water quality concerns exist, the discharge permits have

been adjusted accordingly on an airport‐specific basis.

 A “One size fits all” approach is not appropriate, as every airport is different.  There is a need for

a site‐specific approach.

 The need for flexibility in implementing the requirements

 The need for “credit” towards the collection requirement for pollution prevention activities.  

Specifically, they noted pollution prevention had been a focus of their efforts to reduce aircraft

deicing fluid (ADF) discharges and specifically cited reduced fluid usage associated with new

equipment that reduces the amount of ADF sprayed in half, blending for ambient temperature

conditions, forced air nozzles, warmed ADF, and ADF with lower BOD content.

 EPA has undercosted this rule, particularly with respect to storage.

 The technologies EPA cited in the proposal don’t achieve the required collection percentage –

even at the model facilities.

 Feasibility concerns associated with possible technologies.  Specifically mentioned plug and

pump and concerns about infiltration and concern that system may overfill before they can

vaccum out the collected fluid, particularly during rain events

 ADF from defrost deicing operations can not be collected.

 EPA should regulate BOD and not COD

 EPA has not provided adequate notice and comment if it selects plug and pump as the

technology basis. because EPA rejected it in the proposal

 50% of the pollution reductions are associated with airfield pavement deicing yet 95% of the

costs are associated with aircraft deicing

EPA asked whether ATA and ACI had any specific alternative proposed suggestions to address these

concerns, but ATA and ACI did not have any suggestions to offer.  Rather, they requested an open,

further dialogue with EPA to jointly come up with resolutions.
December 3, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VALERIE A. PHILLIPS AKA VALERIE PHILLIPS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00716

- CV V.

EXCELSIOR ON THE PAR K , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on August 19, 2015. H aving considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Valerie A. Phillips aka Valerie Phillips.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0407

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

KEITH WILLIAM WALKER, 

Defendant and Appellant, 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 30, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 25 2021

05/25/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0407
Kenderrick Deshawn MCCLAIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4455

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 2, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal is granted in circuit court case number 2015CF-009642-A000-XX. This order shall serve as a timely notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence, the latter imposed November 9, 2016. Within twenty days the trial court shall consider appellant's eligibility for appointment of appellate counsel, provided appellant files within ten days a motion in the circuit court requesting same accompanied by a financial affidavit, and shall enter an order thereupon, with a copy to appellant and a copy to this court.

The circuit court clerk shall treat this order as a notice of appeal, promptly certify same and return it to this court as with any notice of appeal, accompanied by any order of indigency that may have been entered by the circuit court, and a new appellate case number will be assigned to this appeal and an acknowledgment letter will issue at that time.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Wayne BANKS

2018-KK-516

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 24th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

Writ denied.

Hughes, J., would deny on the showing made.

GENOVESE, J., would grant in part.
Robert P. TEELING, Appellant, v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, N.A., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 719 

Recognizing September 22, 2020, as ‘‘National Voter Registration Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. COONS, Ms. 

CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. 

HEINRICH, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. JONES, Mr. KING, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. 

MERKLEY, Ms. ROSEN, Ms. SMITH, Mr. UDALL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

WYDEN, and Mr. REED) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing September 22, 2020, as ‘‘National Voter 

Registration Day’’. 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes September 22, 2020, as ‘‘Na3 tional Voter Registration Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages each voting-eligible citizen of the 

5 United States— 

6 (A) to register to vote; 

7 (B) to verify with the appropriate State or 

8 local election official that the name, address, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 719 ATS 

1 and other personal information on record is 

2 current; and 

3 (C) to cast a ballot in the election if the 

4 voting-eligible citizen would like to do so. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
20-F












Exhibit 10.11  



Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm 



We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-122236) and
related Prospectus and on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-101979) pertaining to TTI Team
Telecom International Ltd. Employee Option Plan, as amended and Forms S-8 (Registration
No. 333-139716 and Registration No. 333-127097) pertaining to TTI Team Telecom
International Ltd. 2004 Employee Share Option Plan, as amended, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of TTI Team Telecom International Ltd., included in this
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008. 



		
		
		
		
		
	 	Yours Truly,
	 
	 	/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
	 
	March 31, 2009	KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
	Tel-Aviv, Israel	A Member of Ernst & Young Global
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1147 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to deliver notice of the denial of claims for benefits under the 

laws administered by the Secretary by certified mail, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2021 

Mr. LATTA (for himself, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. RYAN, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. 

LAMALFA, Ms. SPANBERGER, Mr. SAN NICOLAS, and Mr. TURNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to deliver notice of the denial 

of claims for benefits under the laws administered by 

the Secretary by certified mail, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Right to Ex5 pediency Act’’. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1147 IH

1 SEC. 2. DELIVERY OF NOTICE OF DENIAL OF BENEFITS 

2 UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY THE SEC3 RETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS BY CER4 TIFIED MAIL. 

5 Section 5104 of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 section: 

8 ‘‘(c) In any case where the Secretary denies a benefit 

9 sought, the notice required by subsection (a) shall be deliv10 ered by certified mail.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02517]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Proposed Collection of Information: Application by Voluntary 
Guardian of Incapacitated Owner of United States Savings Bonds or 
Savings Notes

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Currently the Bureau of the Fiscal 
Service within the Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments 
concerning the Application by Voluntary Guardian of Incapacitated Owner 
of United States Savings Bonds or Savings Notes.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 11, 2022 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments and requests for additional 
information to Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Bruce A. Sharp, Room 
#4006-A, P.O. Box 1328, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328, or 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Application by Voluntary Guardian of Incapacitated Owner of 
United States Savings Bonds or Savings Notes.
    OMB Number: 1530-0031.
    Form Number: FS Form 2513.
    Abstract: The information is requested to establish the right of a 
voluntary guardian to conduct transactions on behalf of a mentally 
incapacitated bond or note owner.
    Current Actions: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,000.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 20 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 333.
    Request for Comments: Comments submitted in response to this notice 
will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All 
comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited 
on: 1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether 
the information shall have practical utility; 2. the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information; 3. 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; 4. ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and 5. 
estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, 
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: February 2, 2022.
Bruce A. Sharp,
Bureau Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-02517 Filed 2-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

August 9, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with American Clean Skies Foundation

FROM: Jeff Alson, US EPA

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

EPA staff met with representatives of the American Clean Skies Foundation on May 10, 2012. 

The meeting was held at EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) headquarters 

in Washington, D.C. with videoconferencing to OTAQ’s National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions 

Laboratory in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The meeting was requested by the American Clean Skies 

Foundation to discuss its comments on the EPA/NHTSA Proposed Rulemaking for Greenhouse 

Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles.

Attached are materials that were distributed at the meeting by the American Clean Skies 

Foundation.

American Clean Skies Foundation attendees were Gregory Staple and Chelsea Henderson 

Maxwell (Partner, The Clark Group, representing American Clean Skies Foundation).

EPA attendees were Margo Oge, William Charmley, and Jeff Alson.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 123 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of H.R. 1437, the 

3 Clerk of the House of Representatives shall amend the 

4 title so as to read: ‘‘Making further continuing appropria-
2 

•HCON 123 EH 

1 tions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023, and 

2 for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 123 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 

1437.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Annual Report of New World Brands, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Costas Ataliotis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of our
knowledge:


(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of New
World Brands, Inc.


Date:  March 11, 2005                   /s/ Costas Ataliotis
                                        --------------------
                                        Costas Ataliotis
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (principal executive officer)
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 22-1180

___________________________ 

Tabitha Regina Cain

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration

 Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Delta

____________ 

Submitted: August 15, 2022

Filed: September 6, 2022

[Unpublished] 

____________

Before LOKEN, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Tabitha Cain appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of 

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We agree with the 

1

The Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern 

District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred to by consent of the parties, 28 

U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2- 

district court that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the adverse 

decision. See Kraus v. Saul, 988 F.3d 1019, 1023-24 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of 

review). 

Specifically, we conclude that (1) the administrative law judge (ALJ) did not

err in finding Cain’s visual and mental impairments non-severe, see Kirby v. Astrue, 

500 F.3d 705, 708-09 (8th Cir. 2007) (substantial evidence supported finding that 

claimant did not have severe mental impairment, as he did not initially allege 

disability due to mental illness, medical evidence was contradictory, and he had no 

long-term mental health treatment); (2) the RFC determination was supported by 

substantial evidence, including the diagnostic imaging and testing results, the 

findings on physical examination, and the state agency consultants’ opinions, see

Anderson v. Shalala, 51 F.3d 777, 779 (8th Cir. 1995) (substantial evidence 

supported RFC determination based on opinions of 2 reviewing physicians and 

ALJ’s independent analysis of medical evidence); and (3) the ALJ did not err by 

failing to obtain opinion evidence from an unspecified treating physician, see

Hensley v. Colvin, 829 F.3d 926, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (there is no requirement that 

RFC finding be supported by specific medical opinion; when medical record is 

adequately developed, ALJ is not required to seek opinion from treating physician). 

The district court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EX PARTE Ronnie Odell PARKER

CR-16-0330

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
EX-10.34






Exhibit 10(34)




SUMMARY OF 2009 SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS




The following table sets forth the current base salaries provided to the Company’s CEO and the four
most highly compensated executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”):



	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	Current Salary	 
	Andrew B. Schmitt
	 	$	620,000	 
	Jerry W. Fanska
	 	$	365,000	 
	Steven F. Crooke
	 	$	310,000	 
	Eric R. Despain
	 	$	300,000	 
	Gregory F. Aluce
	 	$	275,000	 






All of the Named Executive Officers, including Andrew B. Schmitt, President and CEO, Jerry W.
Fanska, Senior Vice President—Finance and Treasurer, Steven F. Crooke, Senior Vice
President—General Counsel and Secretary, Eric R. Despain, Senior Vice President and President of
the Minerals Division and Gregory F. Aluce, Senior Vice President overseeing the Company’s legacy
water business, are also eligible to receive a bonus each year under the Company’s Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Executive IC Plan”). The bonuses paid to the Company’s CEO and
four most highly compensated executive officers under the Executive IC Plan for the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2009 are as shown in the following table:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	FY 2009 Bonus	 
	Andrew B. Schmitt
	 	$	562,437	 
	Jerry W. Fanska
	 	$	248,334	 
	Steven F. Crooke
	 	$	210,914	 
	Eric R. Despain
	 	$	272,098	 
	Gregory F. Aluce
	 	$	186,030	 






Under the Executive IC Plan, each participant is eligible for an annual cash bonus in a target
amount (the “Target Bonus”) equal to a percentage (80% in the case of Mr. Schmitt and 60% in the
case of Messrs. Fanska, Crooke, Despain and Aluce) of such participant’s base compensation. The
Target Bonus is adjusted (up or down) based upon the performance of the Company as compared to
certain goals adopted and approved by the Board of Directors. In no event, however, can a
participant’s annual cash bonus under the Executive IC Plan exceed a certain percentage (160% in
the case of Mr. Schmitt and 120% in the case of Messrs. Fanska, Crooke, Despain and Aluce) of such
participant’s base compensation for the relevant year. No bonuses will be payable should
performance be below 80% of the relevant goals established. In addition, the formula bonus derived
as described in the preceding sentences can be further adjusted (up or down) at the discretion of
the Board of Directors by up to one-third of the Target Bonus.



A Form 8-K will be filed to describe the goals set by the Board of Directors of the Company for the
executive officers to qualify for a bonus under the Executive IC Plan for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2010.
Shakur MALIK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2059

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.