alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Lynne M. Jurek v. Jeffrey S. Shannon II

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00092

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 38540

Trial court: 312th District Court of Harris Cou nty

Appellant’s “Motion to Voluntary Dismiss Appeal” [sic] is DENIED , without prejudice

to refiling. The certificate of service is not compliant with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.5 and lists a document other than a motion to dismiss as the documen t served. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 9.5.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Acti ng individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 2, 2015
J.A.R. v. STATE

CR-15-0378

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Justin EICHMANN, Appellant, v. Kristina EICHMANN, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1248

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
June FITZPATRICK, Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Thomas L. FITZPATRICK, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4556

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IV 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 90 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should invoke the authorities provided under the Defense Production Act of 1950 to increase 

the production of baby formula and provide for the equitable distribution 

of baby formula through Federally qualified health centers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2022 

Mr. GOTTHEIMER (for himself, Ms. TITUS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BACON, 

Ms. MANNING, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. STEVENS, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. PAPPAS, 

Mr. PHILLIPS, Ms. SLOTKIN, Ms. SHERRILL, Mr. CASE, Mr. COSTA, Mr. 

VICENTE GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Ms. HOULAHAN, 

and Ms. CLARKE of New York) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should 

invoke the authorities provided under the Defense Production Act of 1950 to increase the production of baby 

formula and provide for the equitable distribution of 

baby formula through Federally qualified health centers. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 

3 President should invoke the authorities provided under the 

4 Defense Production Act of 1950 (including the use of the 

5 prioritization of contracts, loans, loan guarantees, direct 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HCON 90 IH 

1 purchase authority, and the authority to procure and in2 stall equipment in private industrial facilities) to increase 

3 the production of baby formula and provide for the equi4 table distribution of baby formula through Federally quali5 fied health centers. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<CIK>                         0000797510
<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       18
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    19
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      19
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                          18
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        19
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
                                          


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SAN Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, John
Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of December 31, 2004 and for the periods then ended.


Date: March 29, 2005
                                      /s/ John Jenkins
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                          John Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

ROBERT ARTHUR BREWSTER, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 13-1418 

(D.C. No. 1:13-CR-00081-RBJ-1) 

(D. Colo.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before LUCERO, HOLMES, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges. 

 

 After entering into a plea agreement that included a waiver of his right to 

appeal, Robert Arthur Brewster pleaded guilty to one count of producing child 

pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). He was sentenced to 235 months of 

imprisonment, lifetime supervised release, and $3,000 in restitution, and he forfeited 

certain computer equipment. Notwithstanding the waiver, Mr. Brewster appealed. 

 

* This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the 

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The 

case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment 

is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, 

and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent 

with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

November 18, 2013

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
- 2 - 

The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver under United States v. 

Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1325, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). In 

response, through counsel, Mr. Brewster has conceded that the appeal waiver is 

enforceable. And although we need not address a Hahn factor that the defendant 

does not contest, see United States v. Porter, 405 F.3d 1136, 1143 (10th Cir. 2005), 

our independent review confirms that all of the Hahn factors are satisfied. 

 The motion to enforce is granted and the appeal is dismissed. 

 Entered for the Court 

 Per Curiam
Jeremy Cornell RAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5137

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 20, 2018

Frederick J. Gant, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
#### Larrietta JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Robin Lennox-Auston; Lisa Wright, Privacy Officer; Janet Henderson; Diane R. Godman, Compensation & Pension Examiner, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-1777

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

*781Larrietta Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Tiffany M. Mallory, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larrietta Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed and advised Johnson that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Johnson has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,682,127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,137,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (38,458)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,434,573
<PP&E>                                       7,281,902
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,906,532)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,220,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,435,587
<BONDS>                                      1,904,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,227
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,596,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,220,264
<SALES>                                     51,188,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,188,954
<CGS>                                       42,730,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,950,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,172,393
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (38,458)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             513,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,753,388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,358
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,804,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,804,746)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.91)


</TABLE>
Carmen A. ZAMMIELLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3561

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132196 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132196 COA: 270887 Oakland CC: 2005-204116-FH CLAY GREGORY NORTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant the application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v Conway , 474 Mich 1140 (2006)

M ARKMAN , J., would grant the app lication for leave to a ppeal for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in People v Wright , 474 Mich 1138 (2006).

s0130 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 2, 2007

Clerk
# V OFFIC E O F TH E PRESIDEN T .,, , „ ^



### U • N Y T :::;rARTMM-O f - Stat e Universit y of

Ne w Yor

k ;f,hJ0pO®flrdTj^t

M • Canton , N

Y 13617-109 6 • www.canton.ed u 

### " :":^ & OPERATION S " '" " 

# CANTO N

Septembe r 2 , 201 0 

### iC I 

### ! 3 A q : 

### I 1 DR . JOSEP H L . KENNEDY , Presiden t OFFICE : 315-386-720 4 FAX : 315-386-793 4 president@canton.ed

u

Ms . Susa n L . Kurland Assistant Secretar y fo r Aviatio n an

d Internationa

l Affair s U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , SE Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Grant Applicatio n fo

r Tow n o f Massen aUnde

r th e DO T Small Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t Program : DOCKE

T DOT-OST-2010-012 4 Dea r Ms . Kurland : I a mwritin g i

n suppor t o f th e applicatio n filed b

y th e Town o f

Massen ato market

Essentia l Ai r Servic e a t the Massen aInternationa

l Airport . I als o wis h t o confir mth e commitmen

t o f th e Stat e Universit

y o f New Yor k Colleg e o f

Technolog y a

t Canto n (SUN

Y Canton ) to achievin g th e objective s o f th e gran t application . Specifically , w e understan d an d agre e to assis t

th e Tow n o f

Massen awith :

• Plannin g an

d implementin g grant-funde d "Fl y Massena " events/promotion s to encourag e us e o f

th e EA S servic e a

t the Massen aAirport .

• Providin g input

int o "Fl y Massena " marketin g materials .

• Providin g guidanc e an

d assistanc e t o professional s workin g o n air servic e dat a collectio n an

d market researc h i n suppor t o f improvin g EA S enplanements . SUN Y Canto n applaud s th e ongoin g wor k o f the Tow n o f

Massena , an

d o f th e St . Lawrenc e Valley Ai r Tas k Forc e fro m2004-2009 , towar

d improvin g ai r

servic e i n th e centra

l par t o f th e rural . Norther

n Ne w York-Canadia

n borde r region . W

e concur tha t increasin g enplanemen

t number s i

n Massena , throug h th e EA S marketin g progra mpropose d i

n it s gran t application , i s th e next

ste p i n th e proces s o f

attractin g acarrier

tha t wil l wor k wit h u s to mov e beyond subsidize d air service . I encourag e the U.S . DO T to awar d th e Town o f

Massen agrant

fimding t o promot

e their EA S service . I n return , w e will do ou

r best , a s acommunit

y partner , to assur

e th e succes s o f

th e "Fly Massena " campaign .

o^p h L ; Kenned

y 'siden t
Shannon G. WIGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-656

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MAGNACROSS LLC,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

OKI DATA AMERICAS, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1840

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas in No. 3:20

- cv

- 01959

- M, Chief

Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The above

- captioned appeal is dismissed under Fed.

R. App. P. 42(b).

(2) Each side shall bear the ir own costs.

June 7, 2023

Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

J ar r ett B. Perlow

A cting Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 7, 2023 Case: 22-1840 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 06/07/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CHAD A. MOORE, 

 Case No. 2:18-cv-379 

 Petitioner, JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

 v. 

WARDEN, NOBLE 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

 Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 On October 23, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) be granted, and that the Petition

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed without prejudice unless 

Petitioner notified the Court within fourteen (14) days that he wished to delete his unexhausted 

claims and proceed solely on his remaining exhausted claim of the denial of the effective assistance 

of counsel. (ECF No. 8.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no 

objections have been filed, and Petitioner has not notified the Court that he wishes to proceed 

solely on his remaining exhausted claim. 

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The 

Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED. This action is hereby DISMISSED without 

prejudice as unexhausted. 

 Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 

474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the Court 

DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. 
2 

 The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter final judgment 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Algenon L. Marbley___________ 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

November 30, 2018
Exhibit
4.7

     

    
      SUMMARY
OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

    

    


    The
following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the
non-employee directors of Commtouch Software Ltd. (the “Company”) for services
as directors:.

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              Directors
      are granted stock options, with new directors receiving an initial grant
      of 50,000 options and continuing directors receiving an “evergreen” option
      grant of 16,667 options.

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              Through
      2008, directors did not receive cash compensation for their
      services.  However, at the annual meeting in December 2008,
      shareholders approved the payment of cash compensation, in addition to the
      stated options compensation, according to the
  following:

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              NIS
      31,700 base annually per director, as linked to the applicable Israeli
      consumer price index, payable in four equal installments at the beginning
      of each calendar quarter; and

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              NIS
      1,590 per director per face to face Board or committee meeting or NIS954
      (60% of NIS 1590) in case of telephonic participation at such meeting,
      payable at the beginning of each calendar quarter following the quarter
      during which a Board member participated in a meeting. No separate per
      meeting compensation will be paid for committee meetings that are held on
      the same day immediately prior or subsequent to a Board
      meeting.  In that event, a Board and committee meeting will be
      considered one meeting.

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.

            	
              For
      non-Israeli based directors, the amounts set forth will be paid in United
      States dollars, according to the representative rate of exchange published
      by the Bank of Israel on the date of
payment.

            


    

     

    Other
than the foregoing option grants, cash compensation and reimbursement of
expenses, the Company does not compensate its directors for serving on its board
of directors.
IV 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 80 

Commending the heroism of Olathe East High School Administrator Dr. 

Kaleb Stoppel and School Resource Officer Erik Clark in responding 

to a student armed with a firearm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2022 

Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas (for herself, Mr. MANN, and Mr. LATURNER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Commending the heroism of Olathe East High School Administrator Dr. Kaleb Stoppel and School Resource Officer Erik Clark in responding to a student armed with 

a firearm. 

Whereas, on Friday, March 4, 2022, Olathe East High 

School Administrator Dr. Kaleb Stoppel (in this preamble 

referred to as Dr. Stoppel) and School Resource Officer 

Erik Clark (in this preamble referred to as Officer Clark) 

were shot and wounded while engaging an armed student; 

Whereas Dr. Stoppel’s decision to remove the student from 

class and Officer Clark’s swift response to neutralize the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 80 IH 

shooter prevented the loss of innocent lives at Olathe 

East High School; 

Whereas Officer Clark has been a School Resource Officer at 

Olathe East High School for 7 years and a law enforcement officer for 15 years; and 

Whereas Dr. Stoppel has been the Assistant Principal and 

Athletic Director for Olathe East High School for nearly 

4 years and an educator for nearly 13 years: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) commends Administrator Dr. Kaleb Stoppel 

4 and School Resource Officer Erik Clark for their he5 roic actions to protect students and staff of Olathe 

6 East High School; and 

7 (2) recognizes Administrator Dr. Kaleb Stoppel 

8 and School Resource Officer Erik Clark’s years of 

9 dedication and service to their community as an edu10 cator and a member of law enforcement, respec11 tively. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS