alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO THE




METLIFE AUXILIARY PENSION PLAN




(As amended and restated effective January 1, 2008)




              The MetLife Auxiliary Pension Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2009, as follows:



	 	 	 	 
	 	1.	 	Part I, Article 4, Section 4.2 is hereby amended by adding the following after the final
paragraph:
	 	 	 	 
	 	“Notwithstanding the provisions of (a) above, Final Average Compensation that can be taken into
account to determine each Participant’s benefit under this Plan cannot exceed $4.6 million.” 
	 	 	 	 
	 	2.	 	Part I, Article 4, Section 4.6 is hereby amended by adding the following after the final
paragraph:
	 	 	 	 
	 	“Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Section 4.6, Final Average Compensation that can be
taken into account to determine each Participant’s benefit under this Plan cannot exceed $4.6
million.”
	 	 	 	 
	 	          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be adopted in its name and behalf
this 25th day of March, 2009, by its officer thereunto duly authorized.












	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Margery Brittain
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Margery Brittain, Plan Administrator
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/  Bonita Haskins
Exhibit 99.1

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
    of Premark International, Inc.:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 28, 1996 (listed in the financial table of contents appearing
on page 29 of this Form 10-K Annual Report under the heading "Financial
Statements") present fairly, in all material respects, the results of
operations and cash flows of Premark International, Inc. and its subsidiaries
for the year ended December 28, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles.  These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on 
these financial statements based on our audit.  We conducted our audit of 
these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards 
which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable 
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material 
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence 
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.  We
have not audited the consolidated financial statements of Premark
International, Inc. for any period subsequent to December 28, 1996.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 14, 1997
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 61 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal 

the sixteenth article of amendment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2021 

Mr. DAVIDSON (for himself, Mr. BABIN, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. BISHOP of North 

Carolina, Mr. NORMAN, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. 

HICE of Georgia, Mr. CLOUD, and Mr. CAWTHORN) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to repeal the sixteenth article of amendment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), 

4 SEC. 1. That the following article is proposed as an 

5 amendment to the Constitution of the United States, 

6 which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part 

7 of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of 

8 three-fourths of the several States within seven years after 

9 the date of its submission for ratification: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 61 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘Effective 2 years after the ratification of this article 

3 of amendment, the sixteenth article of amendment to the 

4 Constitution of the United States is repealed, and the 

5 Congress shall have no power to lay and collect taxes on 

6 incomes, from whatever source derived, except in time of 

7 war declared by the Congress.’’. 

8 SEC. 2. Not later than 180 days after the ratification 

9 of the article of amendment in section 1, the Secretary 

10 of the Treasury shall submit a report to Congress con11 taining recommendations for any legislation that may be 

12 necessary to implement such article. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned, John D. White, Chief Financial Officer of Lone Star Steakhouse
& Saloon, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to
his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 7, 2004 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                         /s/ John D. White
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         John D. White
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         October 18, 2004
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1028 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to revise and update the Department 

of Defense regulations to allow trademarks owned or controlled by the 

Department of Defense to be combined with religious insignia on commercial identification tags (commonly known as ‘‘dog tags’’) and to 

be sold by lawful trademark licensees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2021 

Mr. STEUBE (for himself, Mr. WALTZ, Mr. GOHMERT, and Mr. GAETZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to revise and update 

the Department of Defense regulations to allow trademarks owned or controlled by the Department of Defense 

to be combined with religious insignia on commercial 

identification tags (commonly known as ‘‘dog tags’’) and 

to be sold by lawful trademark licensees, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1028 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Insignia on 

3 Dog Tags Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RELIGIOUS INSIGNIA ON COMMERCIAL IDENTIFICA5 TION TAGS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

8 shall review and update Department of Defense Directive 

9 5535.12 and any associated regulations to allow trade10 marks owned or controlled by the Department of Defense 

11 to be combined with religious insignia on commercial iden12 tification tags (commonly known as ‘‘dog tags’’) and to 

13 be sold by lawful trademark licensees. 

14 (b) RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE.—The update to 

15 the Directive under subsection (a) shall be deemed to have 

16 taken effect on September 13, 2013. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
SERVED FEBRUARY 23, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION j>^^i3P0^^^^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ' f](\\<p Qp'rR-\T\C}H^. 

WASHINGTON , D C " '-••- ' '-' 

m FEB ?3 P 2^ 30 

IN THE MATTER OF . 

COVERMARK USA 

•AA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-20M-0488 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010SO7003I8) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. SulMvan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-20M-0488 

(Civil Penally Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Keith Roberts, Respondent's Counsel 

President, Roberts Proprietaries, Inc. 

180 West 80th St. 

New York, NY 10024 

TEL: 917-441-8642 

FAX: 

Gerald A. Ellis, Comp/ainanl's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

l-ederal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Adininistralive Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by e.\pedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
Assignment and Assumption Agreement



 Exhibit 10.26 
 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (the
“Agreement”) is entered into as of December 31, 2008 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Local Insight Regatta Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Assignor”), and Local Insight Media
Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Assignee”). Assignor and Assignee are each individually referred to herein as a “Party,” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.” 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Assignor desires
to assign to Assignee, and Assignee desires to assume, all Assignor’s rights and obligations under that certain Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) dated as of January 2, 2007, by and between Assignor, as
assignee of Local Insight Media LLC, and Marilyn B. Neal; 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Assignment and Assumption. 

 1.1 Assignor hereby
assigns, transfers and sets over to Assignee, and Assignee hereby assumes, all Assignor’s right, title, interest, powers, privileges, remedies, duties, liabilities and obligations under the Employment Agreement. As of the Effective Date,
Assignee shall become entitled to all such right, title, interest, powers, privileges and remedies of Assignor and subject to all such duties, liabilities and obligations of Assignor, in each case as if Assignee were the original party to the
Employment Agreement. 
 1.2 As of the Effective Date, the term “Company,” as used in the Employment Agreement, shall refer to
Assignee, and Assignee will be bound by and perform Assignor’s obligations under the Employment Agreement. 
  

	2.	Miscellaneous. 

 2.1 This Agreement shall be
governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of Colorado, without regard to conflicts of law provisions. 
 2.2. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement among the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement shall not be altered, amended, modified or otherwise changed by any oral communications
of any kind or character, or by any written communication, unless signed by a duly authorized representative of each of the Parties. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date
first written above. 
  

			
	LOCAL INSIGHT REGATTA HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ JOHN S. FISCHER
	Name:	 	John S. Fischer
	Title:	 	General Counsel and Secretary
	
	LOCAL INSIGHT MEDIA, L.P.
		
	By:	 	/s/ JOHN S. FISCHER
	Name:	 	John S. Fischer
	Title:	 	General Counsel and Secretary


  

 2
Exhibit 11.1



<TABLE>

                      Litchfield Financial Corporation
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share



<CAPTION>                         Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                        June 30,               June 30,
                                    1999        1998          1999       1998
                                 ---------   ---------    ---------  -----------
<S>                              <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>

Basic:
   Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding.... 6,908,145   5,754,018    6,897,411   5,706,887
                                 ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

   Net income....................$3,207,000  $2,309,000   $5,485,000  $3,859,000
                                 ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

   Net income per common share...$      .46  $      .40   $      .80  $      .68
                                 ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

Diluted:
   Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding.... 6,908,145   5,754,018    6,897,411   5,706,887
   Weighted average number of
    common stock equivalents
    outstanding:
    Stock options................   278,326     363,814      292,077     362,277
                                 ----------   ---------   ----------   ---------

   Weighted average common and
     common equivalent shares
     outstanding................. 7,186,471   6,117,832    7,189,488   6,069,164
                                 ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

   Net income....................$3,207,000  $2,309,000   $5,485,000  $3,859,000
                                 ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

   Net income per common share...$      .45  $      .38   $      .76  $      .64
                                 ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
MASSBANK Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-11949 and No. 33-82110) on Form S-8 of MASSBANK Corp. of our report dated
January 9, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MASSBANK Corp.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report is
incorporated by reference into the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K
of MASSBANK Corp.


                                              /s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2003
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02244

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

02244\02244_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

02244\02244_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

02244\02244_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 02244\02244_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 02244\02244_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02244\02244_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02244\02244_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02244\02244_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02244\02244_Part H.xls Plant certification statement

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen D2-3 CBI 0Fe Report .pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen D2-3 CBI ABMet Pilot Report .pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram C2-31-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram C2-31-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram C2-31-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram C2-31-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram C2-31-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram D-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram D-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram D-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram D-7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Diagram WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02244\Supporting Documents\Bowen Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02244\Supporting Documents\GPC 2009 Form 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02244\Supporting Documents\Transmittal letter - Georgia Power.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database .
#### Hawkins *v.*Wood.

Opinion delivered June 24, 1929.

*W. A. Singfield,*for appellant.

*Tom F. Digby,*for appellee.

Kirby, J.

This appeal comes from a decree refusing confirmation of a sale of real estate by the court’s commissioner in a suit for partition.

Appellee, one of the defendants in the suit, objected to the confirmation of the sale, alleging that it was agreed that he should be notified of the time and place of sale, which was not done, and he was thereby prevented from attending it; that no other person was present and bidding on the property except Ike Hawkins, to whom it was sold for the sum of $200, which was a grossly inadequate price for the property, and submitted a bid of $250, 25 per cent, more than the price for which the property was sold.

The court refused to confirm the sale, which it ordered set aside, and directed the icommissioner to re-advertise and sell the land again as provided in the original decree.

The rule, as stated in *Wells*v. *Lenox,*108 Ark. 366, 159 S. W. 1099, Ann. Cas. 1914B, 11, in reference to judicial sales, “is that, in the absence of fraud and unfair*846ness, mere inadequacy of price, however gross, does not invalidate the sale. But the court has and may exercise discretion in either confirming or rejecting judicial sales, which discretion must be exercised according to fixed rules, and not arbitrarily, and the bidder has the right to insist upon its exercise in such maimer only. *George*v. *Norwood,*77 Ark. 216, 91 S. W. 557, 113 Am. St. Rep. 143, 7 Am. Cas. 171; *Chapin*v. *Quisenberry,*138 Ark. 68, 210 S. W. 341.

The sale was not only for a grossly inadequate price, but appellee ivas misled and prevented from attending it by the failure of the other parties in interest or the commissioner to notify him of the time and place of the sale, as was agreed to be done, thus permitting appellant to attend the sale and bid without competition for the property, working a hardship against the owners of the property, and the court did not err in refusing to confirm the sale. *Chapin*v. *Quisenberry, supra; Moore*v. *McJudkins,*136 Ark. 293, 206 S. W. 445; *Stevenson*v. *Gault,*131 Ark. 398, 199 S. W. 112, Ann. Cas. 1918E, 433; *Hawkins*v. *Jones,*131 Ark. 478, 199 S. W. 549.

The decree is affirmed.
Pablo Odeley Puente FUMERO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1128

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          MAR-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               SEP-30-1998
[CASH]                                            3732
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                     8788
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     0
[PP&E]                                            2879
[DEPRECIATION]                                    2182
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                   80834
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                                0
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                          3888
[OTHER-SE]                                       24692
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                     80834
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                 16407
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                    11862
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                   4545
[INCOME-TAX]                                      1885
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                               2660
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                      2660
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                     0.47
[EPS-DILUTED]                                     0.47
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Rentrak Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark L. Thoenes,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| By:                         | /s/ Mark L. Thoenes |   |   |
|-----------------------------|---------------------|--------|--------|
| Mark L. Thoenes             |
| Executive Vice President    |
| and Chief Financial Officer |
| Rentrak Corporation         |
| June 12, 2006          |

 

 

----
Ranis FORD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Anthony Doyle MASK v. STATE

CR-15-1139

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.