alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                           |
|-------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Robert H. Schottenstein               |
| Robert H. Schottenstein                   |
| Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive    |
| Officer (principal executive officer) and |
| President                                 |

----

|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Phillip G. Creek                              |
| Phillip G. Creek                                  |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
| (principal financial officer) and Director        |

----

|                                           |
|-------------------------------------------|
| /s/ J. Thomas Mason                       |
| J. Thomas Mason                           |
| Executive Vice President, General Counsel |
| and Director                              |

----

|                      |
|----------------------|
| /s/ Joseph A. Alutto |
| Joseph A. Alutto     |
| Director             |

----

|                              |
|------------------------------|
| /s/Friedrich K. M. Böhm |
| Friedrich K. M. Böhm    |
| Director                     |

----

|                    |
|--------------------|
| /s/ Thomas D. Igoe |
| Thomas D. Igoe     |
| Director           |

----

|                     |
|---------------------|
| /s/ Jeffrey H. Miro |
| Jeffrey H. Miro     |
| Director            |

----

|                       |
|-----------------------|
| /s/ Norman L. Traeger |
| Norman L. Traeger     |
| Director              |

----

|                      |
|----------------------|
| /s/ Sharen J. Turney |
| Sharen J. Turney     |
| Director             |
Mary Ann CARTER v. Lepolean PETERSON

2160098

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 13, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40369

Conference Calendar

TERRY LEE SCOTT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN CHILDRESS,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CV-12

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terry Lee Scott, federal prisoner # 62305-079, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

challenging the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea

conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

cocaine and crack cocaine. 

Scott argues under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005), that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment because it

was enhanced based upon facts found by a judge. The decision in

Booker does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral
No. 06-40369

-2-

review, and a Booker claim does not satisfy the test for filing a

§ 2241 petition under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 2005).

For the first time on appeal, Scott raises a factual

challenge to the district court’s application of a four-level

enhancement for his being a leader or organizer of the criminal

activity. This newly raised factual claim is not reviewable for

the first time on appeal. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder

Co., 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned, being a director of LANDS END, INC., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby constitute and
appoint EDGAR O. HUBER, MICHAEL P. ROSERA and KARL A. DAHLEN with full power to each of them to act alone, as the true and lawful attorneys and agents of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and resubstitution to each of said attorneys,
to execute, file, and deliver all instruments and generally to do all acts and things which said attorneys and agents, or any of them, deem advisable to enable the Company to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereto, relating to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014, including specifically, but without limitation of the general authority hereby
granted, the power and authority to sign his/her name as a director of the Company, as indicated below opposite his/her signature, to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014 and all amendments and papers
supplemental thereto; and the undersigned does hereby fully ratify and confirm all that said attorneys and agents or any of them, or the substitute of any of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated March 25, 2014.



|                  |  |          |  | 
|----------------- |  | -------- |  | 
|                  |  |         
|Signature         |  | Title    |  | 
|                  |  |         
|/s/ Tracy Gardner |  | Director |  | 



---

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned, being a director of LANDS END, INC., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby constitute and
appoint EDGAR O. HUBER, MICHAEL P. ROSERA and KARL A. DAHLEN with full power to each of them to act alone, as the true and lawful attorneys and agents of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and resubstitution to each of said attorneys,
to execute, file, and deliver all instruments and generally to do all acts and things which said attorneys and agents, or any of them, deem advisable to enable the Company to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereto, relating to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014, including specifically, but without limitation of the general authority hereby
granted, the power and authority to sign his/her name as a director of the Company, as indicated below opposite his/her signature, to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014 and all amendments and papers
supplemental thereto; and the undersigned does hereby fully ratify and confirm all that said attorneys and agents or any of them, or the substitute of any of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated March 25, 2014.



|                     |  |          |  | 
|-------------------- |  | -------- |  | 
|                     |  |         
|Signature            |  | Title    |  | 
|                     |  |         
|/s/ Josephine Linden |  | Director |  |
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. Such quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: February 19, 2008

By: /s/ James A. Joyce
    -----------------------
    James A. Joyce
    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
David B. LEVERETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3789

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kristopher Daniel HARRIS v. STATE

CR-16-0092

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Manuel Enrique PAGAN, Jr., Appellant, v. Crissy CLADAKIS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3365

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Clint NUGENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-51

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF

US JET, INC.







Pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Business Code Sec. 16-10a-1001 et. seq., the Undersigned Corporation adopts the following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.



1.

The following amendment of the Articles of Incorporation was adopted by the shareholders of the corporation on October 21, 1999, said articles are hereby amended and shall read as follows:

________________________________________________________________

Article I

Name



The name of the corporation is American Coal Corporation.



________________________________________________________________



2.

Additionally, the shareholders consented to a reverse split of the Companys common stock on a 1 for 500 basis.



3.

The number of shares outstanding at the time of adoption was 14,918,603; and the number of shares entitled to vote thereon was the same.



4.

The number of shares represented at the meeting of the shareholders was 10,000,000. All shares voted in favor of the amendment. The shares represented a majority of the issued and outstanding shares. There were no shares voting against the amendment.





Effective the 21st day of October, 1999



__/s/ Jennifer Ngo_______

Jennifer Ngo

President  and Secretary
Exhibit 24.6
 
 STATE OF ARKANSAS             §
 COUNTY OF BENTON                §
 
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
 Know all men by these presents, that I, DANIEL J. ENGLANDER, a Director of AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 18th day of June, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ Daniel J. Englander
 DANIEL J. ENGLANDER
 
 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 
 Before me this 18th day of June, 2010, came Daniel J. Englander, personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.
 
 
 /s/ Kristen C. Begneaud
 NOTARY PUBLIC
Jorge Luis MUNOZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3153

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 13, 2018

Jorge Luis Munoz, Bushnell, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1
  Certification
 pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Immtech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Eric L. Sorkin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
  2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  /s/ Eric L.
Sorkin
 Eric L.
Sorkin
 President
& Chief Executive Officer
 February
11, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20884

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS RUIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-91-CR-27-4

--------------------

April 10, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis Ruiz, federal prisoner #59024-079, appeals the

district court’s denial of his petition for writ of error coram

nobis, which was treated as a successive motion to vacate his

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

The district court properly denied Ruiz’ petition for writ

of error coram nobis. The writ of error coram nobis is used to

attack invalid convictions which have continuing consequences

when the petitioner has served his sentence and is no longer in

custody for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v.
No. 01-20884

-2-

Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 506-13 (1954). Because Ruiz is currently

incarcerated, this remedy is unavailable to him as a matter of

law.

Because Ruiz was asserting that his sentence was

unconstitutional and should be vacated, the district court

properly treated Ruiz’ petition as a successive § 2255 motion. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court did not err in denying

Ruiz’ successive motion to vacate his sentence. Because Ruiz

failed to obtain authorization from this court prior to filing

his successive § 2255 motion, the district court lacked

jurisdiction to entertain his claims. 28 U.S.C. § 2255; 28

U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Accordingly, the district court’s

judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration November 21,2016 Office of the Chief Counsel

BY CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Re: In the matter ofRidanInvestments, Inc.; FDMS No. FAA-2013-1082 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 

# RECEI\/ED NOV 282016 

## HEARING DOCKET

I hereby file myNotice ofAppearance inthis matter. Going forward, I will be the attorney ofrecord and all communications for the Federal Aviation Administration should be addressed to: Charles Raley, FAAEnforcement Division, Western Team, P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007, telephone (310) 725-7108, fax (310) 725- 6816, email: charles.raley@faa.gov. Thankyou. Sincerely,



# CJ[2

Charles Raley, Senior Attorney Enforcement Division, Western Team

cc: by CertifiedMail: Lawrence M. Burek, Esq. 550 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 204 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000
Amendment to Severance Agreement between Registrant and Robert G. Schwartz, Jr.



 Exhibit 10.15 
 AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT, dated as of March 3,
2009, modifies the terms and conditions of the AMENDED AND RESTATED SEVERANCE AGREEMENT between I-many, Inc. (the “Company”) and Robert G. Schwartz, Jr. (“Executive”), dated as of February 8, 2007 (the
“Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. Any term or condition of the Agreement in conflict with the terms or conditions of this
Amendment shall be deemed to be specifically and expressly superseded by the provisions hereof. 
 A. In Section 2.1(b)(ii) of the
Agreement (“Termination by the Company following Change in Control—Severance”), the phrase “... severance equal to twelve (12) months ...” is hereby deleted and replaced with “... severance equal to six
(6) months ....” 
 B. Change of Control Bonus. 
 1. For all purposes of this Agreement, a “Change in Control” is defined as the consummation of any of the following
transactions: (i) any merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto representing immediately thereafter (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting
securities of the surviving or acquiring entity) less than a majority of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving or acquiring entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation;
(ii) any sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (iii) the complete liquidation of the Company. 
 2. No later than 60 days following a Change in Control of the Company, the Company shall pay Executive a lump-sum amount equal to six (6) months of Executive’s annualized base salary (excluding bonuses) in effect as of the date of
the Change in Control, less applicable deductions and withholdings (the “Change in Control Bonus”). In the event the Company has terminated Executive’s employment pursuant to subsection 2.1(a)(1), 2.1(a)(2), 2.1(a)(3) or 2.1(a)(4)
above within 90 days before the consummation of a Change in Control, Executive shall be entitled to the Change in Control Bonus notwithstanding such employment termination, provided Executive has signed a general release of claims against the
Company substantially in the form of the agreement and general release attached at Exhibit A (except that Executive shall not be required to release the Company from claims for payment of the Change in Control Bonus before it has been paid).

 C. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unmodified by this Amendment. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Amendment to be executed in duplicate originals. 
  

							
	 I-MANY, INC.
	  		  	EXECUTIVE
				
	By:	 	 /s/    JOHN A.
RADE        
	  		  	 /s/    ROBERT G. SCHWARTZ,
JR.        

		 	John A. Rade	  		  	Robert G. Schwartz, Jr.
		 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10497 Summary Calendar

LARRY DENTON, on behalf of Sandin Denton, minor Plaintiff - Appellant v. MICHAEL J ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

2:04-CV-331
Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Larry Denton, on behalfof his minor son, Sandin Denton, seeks reviewof the district court judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision that Sandin Denton is not disabled and therefore not entitled to Supplemental Security Income payments under Sections 1602and 1614(a)(3 )(C) of the Social Security Act. After a review of the briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we find no reversible error. Essentially for the reasons stated in United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-10497

2 the report and recommendation of the magistratejudge, which was adopted by the district court, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2332EM

_____________ Harbor Venture, Inc.; Horseshoe * Casinos, (Missouri), L.L.C.; Missouri * River Equities, Inc., * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * John Nichols; Missouri Coalition for * [UNPUBLISHED] the Environment, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: December 10, 1997

Filed: January 7, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Harbor Venture, Inc., Hors eshoe Casinos, L.L.C., and Missouri River Equities, Inc. appeal the district court's ruling rejecting their contention that a gamblin g enterprise is permi tted on real estate governed by the terms of a 1976 consent decree. Af ter de novo review, we are satisfied the district court correctly interpreted th e consentdecree and the record supports the district court's ruling. Because a comprehensiveopinion in this case would lack precedential value, we affirm for th e reasons set forth in the district court's well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                 UROLOGIX, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended,
                                                  March 31,                   March 31,
                                        -------------------------------------------------------
                                              1997          1996          1997          1996
<S>                                       <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Net loss                                  ($1,869,766)  ($2,207,178)  ($5,256,899)  ($5,381,172)
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
 
Weighted average common shares              
 outstanding (1)                            9,158,231     5,224,499     9,149,020     5,225,445

Effect of cheap shares issued (2)                   -       784,234                     784,234
                                           ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
                                            9,158,231     6,008,733     9,149,020     6,009,679
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
Loss per common share                          ($0.20)       ($0.37)       ($0.57)       ($0.90)
                                           ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>

(1)  All shares of preferred stock which were converted to common stock in
conjunction with the initial public offering have been included in the
calculation of weighted average common shares as if converted for all periods
presented.

(2)  All preferred shares issued and options granted from April 5, 1995 to April
4, 1996 are included in the calculation for periods prior to the initial public
offering presented in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 4(D).