alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Oncologix  Tech,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008, as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I
Michael A. Kramarz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                            /s/  Michael A. Kramarz
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Michael A. Kramarz
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
November 4, 2009
Exhibit
10.3

    

     


    Terms of
Employment Arrangement

    between
Slavie Federal Savings Bank

    and
Philip E. Logan

    


    Mr. Logan
is employed on an at-will basis at a rate of pay of $125,840.00 as of January 1,
2009.  Mr. Logan is also eligible to receive annual salary increases
as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and an
annual bonus as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors.  He is also entitled to all benefits available to full-time
employees of Slavie Federal Savings Bank.  Mr. Logan received a bonus
of $46,453.67 for 2008, which was paid in March, 2009.

    


    Mr. Logan
is also compensated for his attendance at board meetings at the same rate as
other board members.  Mr. Logan received $27,550.00, including a
$6,000.00 bonus, for his service as a director during 2008.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00147-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.W., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 78th District Court

of Wichita County (12790-JR-B)

October 18, 2018

Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Amendment no. 3 to the Advisory Agreement



 Exhibit 10.35 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO THE 
 ADVISORY AGREEMENT 
 This amendment no. 3 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8, 2008 (the
“Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as of
March 25, 2009 (the “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement and Amendment no. 1 to the Advisory Agreement dated January 7, 2009. 
 WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend and restate Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement and advance funds
to the Company upon the terms set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and
agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 ADVANCE 
 Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 of this Agreement to the contrary, the Advisor
hereby agrees to advance funds (the “Advance”) to the Company equal to the amount by which the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company from January 1, 2006 through the period ending April 30, 2009 exceeds the
amount of the Company’s Funds from Operations from January 1, 2006 through April 30, 2009. Advisor further agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the Advance if and to the extent that the
Company’s cumulative Funds from Operations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such reimbursement exceeds the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributions declared and payable to the
Company’s Stockholders as of the date of such reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’s Stockholders for the period from July 18, 2006
through the date of such reimbursement. Advisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being made under this Agreement. 
 Signature page follows. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above
written. 
 KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. 
     By: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. 
             Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive Officer 
 KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC 
     By:    Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager 
                 By:  Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner 
                             By: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. 
                                     Charles J. Schreiber,
Jr., Manager
Garron BETHEL v. STATE

CR-16-0244

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### FREMMING v. SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA MINING CO.

No. 3193.

First Division. Juneau.

Sept. 10, 1931.

Hellenthal & Hellenthal, of Juneau, for plaintiff.

H. L.'Faulkner, of Juneau, for defendant.

HARDING, District Judge.

In the case of Frank Fremming against the Southeastern Alaska Mining Company.

This case is before the court upon the demurrer of the defendant to the complaint in the case.

In compliance with the statute in a case of this kind, an answer was also filed, and, when the case came before the court, the court reserved opinion as to the demurrer and heard the evidence upon the complaint and answer.

The question raised by the demurrer, as I view the complaint, is as to whether or not the complainant is entitled to a lien as a watchman and caretaker of this plant.

The question raised by the pleading and argued by counsel is as to whether or not chapter 13 of the 1915 Session *310Laws gives the complainant such lien as a watchman and caretaker; if it does so, the demurrer should be overruled. This, section (section 1) reads: “Every person who * * * performs work or labor in, on or about a mine or mining claim in opening up, * * * or performs any other class or kind of work on, in or about a mine or mining claim necessary or convenient to the development, operation, working or mining thereof, * * * shall have a lien on such mine or mining claim to secure the payment of the amount due for such work or labor.”

 It has been urged by the defendant that this statute, in accordance with the general rule as to statutes, should be strictly construed. I am of the opinion that a statute of this kind should not be, perhaps, so strictly construed as statutes in general, certainly not so strictly construed as to deprive the general terms of the statute of any meaning that they may have consistent with the purpose of the act. As I read this section, the development, operation, working, or mining of a mine or mining claim does not refer to work being done at any particular time, but refers equally well to any development, operation, working, or mining that might take place in the future, and it is my opinion that the work of a watchman and caretaker may not only be convenient to such future development, operation, work, or mining, but may in many instances be necessary to it.

For this reason the demurrer of the defendant is overruled ; exception is allowed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4634-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Colorado (FEMA-4634-DR), dated December 31, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued January 13, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective January 7, 2022. 

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-02249 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
David Keith WAGNER, DOC# R80101, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D17-2520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Mackel D. WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### People v Maurice Taylor,

No. 91267;

Court of Appeals No. 110352.
Howard M. TALENFELD and Julie Zobel Talenfeld, Appellants, v. ROBINETTE HOMES SIGNATURE SERIES, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-1748

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 29, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1139 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1139

To reimburse meals and supplements provided to individuals who have not 
attained the age of 25 under certain meal programs authorized under the 
 Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

  Ms. Jayapal (for herself and Ms. Stefanik) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reimburse meals and supplements provided to individuals who have not 
attained the age of 25 under certain meal programs authorized under the 
 Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Feeding Homeless Youth During COVID-
19 Act''.

SEC. 2. MEALS AND SUPPLEMENTS REIMBURSEMENTS FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE 
              NOT ATTAINED THE AGE OF 25.

    (a) Program for At-Risk School Children.--Beginning on the date of 
enactment of this section, notwithstanding paragraph (1)(A) of section 
17(r) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 
1766(r)), during the COVID-19 public health emergency declared under 
section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), the 
Secretary shall reimburse institutions that are emergency shelters 
under such section 17(r) (42 U.S.C. 1766(r)) for meals and supplements 
served to individuals who, at the time of such service--
            (1) have not attained the age of 25; and
            (2) are receiving assistance, including non-residential 
        assistance, from such emergency shelter.
    (b) Participation by Emergency Shelters.--Beginning on the date of 
enactment of this section, notwithstanding paragraph (5)(A) of section 
17(t) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 
1766(t)), during the COVID-19 public health emergency declared under 
section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), the 
Secretary shall reimburse emergency shelters under such section 17(t) 
(42 U.S.C. 1766(t)) for meals and supplements served to individuals 
who, at the time of such service have not attained the age of 25.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Emergency shelter.--The term ``emergency shelter'' has 
        the meaning given the term under section 17(t)(1) of the 
        Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1766(t)(1)).
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
PLATINUM ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO FOR THE
PERIOD INDICATED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000




<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                              47
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       14,940
<ALLOWANCES>                       (7,175)
<INVENTORY>                         8,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    19,378
<PP&E>                              4,203
<DEPRECIATION>                     (1,625)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      56,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               49,368
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            7
<OTHER-SE>                          7,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        56,461
<SALES>                             10,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    11,103
<CGS>                               6,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       6,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    6,373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (5,820)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (5,820)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                       (5,820)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.97)



</TABLE>
exhibit_10-14.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.14

    


    AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO

    CONSULTING
SERVICES AGREEMENT

    


    This
Second Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement ("Second Amendment") is dated
January 16, 2008 and effective as of February 1, 2008 (“Second Amendment Effective Date”), to
Consulting Services Agreement dated September 15, 2005 and First Amendment
thereto dated and Effective January 1, 2007 (Consulting Services Agreement and
First Amendment thereto are collectively referred to herein as the “Agreement”), between Hythiam,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Hythiam”) and David E. Smith,
& Associates, a California professional corporation (“Consultant”).

    


    The
parties desire to further amend the Agreement to provide for a change in
Consultant's compensation effective February 1, 2008.

    


    Accordingly,
the Parties agree as follows:

    


    1. Modification of
Agreement.  The Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the
previously amended amount $4,167 in Section 3, to $2,500, and compensation for 1⁄2
day or full day Services of Consultant authorized by Hythiam all as provided
with the following:

     

    “Compensation.  Effective
as of the Second Amendment Effective Date, and during the Term thereafter (as
defined in Section 5 of this Agreement) Hythiam will compensate Consultant with
a fee payable on or about the 15th of each
month in arrears in respect of the monthly period just ended, as
follows:  a) a fixed monthly fee of $2,500; and b) for any additional
Services requested of Consultant under this Agreement and authorized in advance
in writing by Hythiam, $800 per each 1⁄2 day of such authorized Service and $1,600
for each full day of such authorized Service.  Consultant acknowledges
that such fee or fees will constitute payment in full for all Services rendered
and the performance by Consultant of all of its other obligations
hereunder.”

    


    2. Defined
Terms.  Capitalized terms that are used and not otherwise
defined in this Amendment have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the
Agreement.

    


    3. Continuing
Effectiveness.  Except as amended by this Second Amendment, the
Agreement, as modified hereby, remains in full force and effect in accordance
with all other of the respective terms and conditions thereof.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment, in each case, by its
duly appointed officer empowered so to act, all as of the date first above
written.

    


    
      	
              David
      E. Smith & Associates

            	 
      	
              Hythiam,
      Inc.

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              /s/
      DAVID E. SMITH, M.D.

            	 
      	
              By:

            	
              /s/
      ANTHONY LAMACCHIA

            
	
              David
      E. Smith, M.D.

            	 
      	 
      	
              Anthony
      LaMacchia

            
	
              President

            	 
      	 
      	
              Senior
      Executive Vice
President
Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW Document 138 Filed 03/08/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW Document 138 Filed 03/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
Jemel Lamar HUDDLESTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3490

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### TH E FLORID A SENAT E Tallahassee , Florid a 32399-110 0

- 1 ^ •v." k -...• " />- / SENATO R J D ALEXANDE R

17t h Distric

t Ms . Aloh aLey , Associatio n Directo r Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n S" " Floor , RoomW86-31 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e SE , Washingto n D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Ms . Ley : Reference : Docke t

DOT-OST-2011-011 9 COMMITTEES : Budget , Chai r Rules . Vic e Chai r Agricultur e Bankin g an d Insuranc e Budge t - Subcommitte e o n Financ e an d Ta x Budge t - Subcommitte e o n Transportation , Tourism . an d Economi c Developmen t Appropriation s Educatio n Pre-K-1 2 Rule s - Subcommitte e o n Ethic s an d Election s JOIN T COMMITTEE : Legislativ e Budge t Commission , Vic e Chai r

--• - C T j \ _ J C D 

### V

' V O r--':'-'-.:.-'-^

. r.-r-5- H -T;tt^:y - :~i-'\~^-^^-(- l 

# S i ^ C/. -

I suppor t th e Lakelan dLinder

Regiona l Airpor t reques t fo r th e Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Grant . Lakelan dLinde

r i s th e newes t

commercial air

servic e airpor

t in th e natio n andi s an ultr a low-cos t aiipor t perfectl y positione dto affor dtourist s eas y acces s to al l o f Centra l Florida , from Orland o an

dDisne y Worl dt

o St . Petersburg andth e Gul f Coas t beaches . Central Florid aha s been very hai-

dhi t b y th e 2008-200 9 economi c slowdow n an dtourists , an dthei r

economi c impact , are critica

l t o th e Lakelan darea' s economi c recovery . Th e applicatio n propose s fundin g to suppor t Lakeland' s partnershi p wit h airline s on aggressiv e marketin g o f

ne w ai r servic e a t th e Airpoit . Thi s Gran

t supporte dmarketin g fun

dwil l enabl e Lakelan dt

o recrui t an dsuppor t criticall y neede dnew Centra l Florid aai r

servic e whic h wil l brin g mor e tourist s andthei r

economi c impac t

to th e region . You r favorabl e consideratio n o f th e LakelandGrant

applicatio n i s greatl y appreciated . Sincerely , JE f Alexander Senator , Distric t

1 7

REPL Y TO : a 20 1 Centra l Avenu e West , Suit e 115 . City Hal l Complex . Lak e Wales , Florid a 3385 3 (883 ) 67B-484 7 • 41 2 Senat e Offic e BuiMing , 40 4 Sout h Monro e Street , Tallahassee , Florid a 32399-110 0 (850 ) 487-504 4 Senate' s Website : iviwv.flse/ia/e.goi ' MIK E HARIDOPOLO S Presiden t o f th e Senat e MICHAE L S . "MIKE " BENNET T Presiden t Pr o Tempor e
Tavaris Maurice PATRICK v. STATE

CR-15-1115

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT UNDER SECTION 2329.02

OHIO REVISED CODE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

SS.

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

I, Richard W. Nagel, Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Ohio, do certify that on 6/16/2023 tjigre ^^s entered in the record in this court,

Western DivisiorQ^f Cincinnati 0 ghio■ m

Case Number: 1:18-CV-00165-MRB

Case Name* Robert Sprague et al. v. Universal Transportation Systems LLC et al.

Judgment in favor of: Winebrake & Santillo, LLC

and against: Quality Transportatlon Services LLC

In the amount of: $18,650.00

Appeal filed/Pending

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have Hereimto set my hand and affixed the seal of this Court, at

Ohio this 3 I Day of , A.D.

of Court

BY: - 't .

7j . ' J i . J . \

Deputy Clerk v. =,

Revised 7/14/15

Case: 1:18-cv-00165-MRB Doc #: 104 Filed: 08/31/23 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 836