alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<CIK>          0000883296
<NAME>         ACRODYNE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                               233,332
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1,218,691
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                        6,881,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   8,631,846
<PP&E>                               552,218
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    13,386,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              4,659,376
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                            6,500
<COMMON>                              69,812
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      13,386,223
<SALES>                            1,575,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                              1,149,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   100,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (750,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       (750,390)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.11)


</TABLE>
Gibbons 

J. 

ORDER the judgment of conviction REVERSED AND 

REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with 

this order." 

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Law Offices of Martin Hart, LLC 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'Because we have concluded that relief is warranted on this claim, 

we need not consider Bass' other contentions. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 94k4(o
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            5708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    44934
<ALLOWANCES>                                     38000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 12642
<PP&E>                                          157056
<DEPRECIATION>                                   88705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1777274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1324143
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13701
<OTHER-SE>                                      363430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1777274
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                325416
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1156794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1130
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               48618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (869627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (869627)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (66579)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 864721
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (71485)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000925252
<NAME> SIGNATURE BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                           4,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     37,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,674
<PP&E>                                          16,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,494
<BONDS>                                        164,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,078
<SALES>                                         90,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,365
<CGS>                                           63,388
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (76)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,837
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,225
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1296 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide authority to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration to provide a cash award 

to Administration employees with foreign language skills, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2021 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N (for herself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide authority 

to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration to provide a cash award to Administration employees with foreign language skills, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CASH AWARD FOR DRUG ENFORCEMENT AD4 MINISTRATION EMPLOYEES WITH FOREIGN 

5 LANGUAGE SKILLS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5761 of title 5, United 

7 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1296 IH

1 ‘‘§ 5761. Foreign language proficiency pay awards for 

2 the Federal Bureau of Investigation and 

3 the Drug Enforcement Administration 

4 ‘‘The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation 

5 or the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Adminis6 tration may, under regulations prescribed by the Director 

7 or the Administrator (as the case may be), pay a cash 

8 award of up to 10 percent of basic pay to any Bureau 

9 or Administration employee (as the case may be) who 

10 maintains proficiency in a language or languages critical 

11 to the mission or who uses one or more foreign languages 

12 in the performance of official duties.’’. 

13 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

14 for subchapter IV of chapter 57 of title 5, United States 

15 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

16 5761 and inserting the following: 

‘‘5761. Foreign language proficiency pay awards for the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ACTIO N
Pettiford , Mari e (OST ) 

### SlO-110120-00 1 CONTRO L N O From : Sent : To : Cc : Subject :
Dea r Secretary LaHood , Stev e & Ginn yHelgeso n [sghelgeson@gmail.com ] Wednesday

. Januar y19 , 201 1 1:1 3 P M LaHood , Ra y(OST ) Kurland , Susa n (OST) ; Devany , Denni s (OST) ; Sean.pamell@alaska.gov ; angerman@aptalaska.ne t Docke t #0ST-1998-489 9 Zi T 

### V

A ^ — A s a3 0 year

residen t o f Wrangel l i n Southeast , I a mvery strongl y i n favo r

o f Alask aAirline^ein g selecte db y DO T t o serv e Wrangel l an dothe r southeas t

town s a s the y hav e don e for th e entir e tim e I hav e bee n here
. The y d o an excellen t

jo b o f transportin g passenger s an dai r freight t o ou r isolate dcommunitie s o n adail y basi s an d ou r economie s ar e dependen t upo n thei r

services
. Than k you . Sincerely , Virgini aHelgeso n Wrangell , Alask a
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Revised 1996 Schedule 27 for Basic and Diluted EPS. Quarters 1,2,3 of 1996
       and Fiscal Year End 1995.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>                     
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000

       
<S>                          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-Mos        3-Mos        3-Mos        12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            Dec-31-1996  Dec-31-1996  Dec-31-1996  Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                 Mar-31-1996  Jun-30-1996  Sep-30-1996  Dec-31-1995
<CASH>                           14,711       14,538       22,680       16,306
<SECURITIES>                      4,005        3,895        3,984        3,473
<RECEIVABLES>                    30,458       27,977       26,673       32,024
<ALLOWANCES>                          0            0            0            0
<INVENTORY>                           0            0            0            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 51,579       49,364       54,776       53,619
<PP&E>                           12,650       18,366       15,309       11,336
<DEPRECIATION>                    3,584        9,689        6,993        3,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  353,946      356,902      357,937      365,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            24,065       23,351       18,309       32,670
<BONDS>                               0            0            0            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0            0            0            0
<PREFERRED>                      78,057       78,320       78,512       78,029
<COMMON>                            436          437          440          436
<OTHER-SE>                      184,573      189,179      194,818      181,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    353,946      356,902      357,937      365,619
<SALES>                               0            0            0            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 44,461       40,345       37,315      113,178
<CGS>                                 0            0            0            0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0            0            0            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 31,124       30,596       25,995       84,056
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0            0            0            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2          (73)         (66)         750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  13,335        9,822       11,386       28,372
<INCOME-TAX>                      6,222        3,230        5,056       12,682
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               7,113        6,592        6,330       15,690
<DISCONTINUED>                        0            0            0            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0            0            0            0
<CHANGES>                             0            0            0            0
<NET-INCOME>                      7,113        6,592        6,330       15,690
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .14          .12          .12          .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .14          .12          .12          .40
        


</TABLE>
JUNG BEA HAN, Appellant, v. Donald C. SPENCER, Clerk of Court, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 10, 2018

Jung Bea Han, pro se, Appellant.

Jason D. English, Milton, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The Court has determined that the Order on Motion to Reinstate the Ownership of Real Property is not a final order or an otherwise appealable non-final order. Thus, the Court lacks appellate jurisdiction to review the order and the appeal is dismissed.

Because Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the circuit court's ruling represents a departure from the essential requirements of the law resulting in harm that cannot be remedied on appeal, we decline the Appellant's request to review *982the order by petition for writ of certiorari. The petition is stricken as unauthorized.

In light of the foregoing, Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal and motion to strike the petition for writ of certiorari are denied as moot.

Roberts, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Exhibit



	
		
	


	




















Exhibit 10(hh)
February 14, 2019




Ken Giacobbe
1007 Amy Place
Gibson, PA 15044




Dear Ken:


I am pleased to confirm that you were issued 60,000 restricted stock units (RSUs) as a special retention award valued at $1,075,200 (based on the Arconic closing stock price of $17.92) on the grant date of February 12, 2019.  The award, which will vest on February 12, 2020, will be subject to your continued employment through the vesting date.  (Please refer to the terms and conditions of the Special Retention Award Agreement.)  This award is a demonstration of our continuing commitment to you.  The enclosed Fact Sheet outlines the terms and conditions of the grant.  


We look forward to your continued contributions toward our success.




Sincerely,


/s/ John Plant


John Plant












Enclosure – Fact Sheet
#### Ronald HAYWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eric C. BROWN, Executive Director; Sharon Land, Deputy Director; Yvonne Alexander, Deputy Director; Josephine B. Clay, Hearing Officer; Joyce Richardson, Program Manager; William Valentine, Rental Specialist Supervisor; Pamela Jones, Compliance Specialist, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1465

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 17, 2017

Decided: August 21, 2017

Ronald Hayward, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Blackburn Riley, BLACKBURN RILEY LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

*103Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Hayward appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint after the parties reached a settlement agreement in which Hayward agreed to release his claims against the defendants.- On appeal, Hayward does not dispute the existence of the agreement or that its terms are clear and constitute the entire agreement among the parties. Because Hayward proffers no viable challenge to the enforceability of the agreement, we affirm the judgment of the district court.* We further deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 On the same day he noted his appeal, Hayward filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion, which the district court subsequently denied. Because Hayward did not note a separate appeal of the order denying his Rule 59 motion, that order is not before this court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii).
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1444 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 187
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1444

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2021

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           December 16, 2021

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 132 North Loudoun Street, Suite 1 in Winchester, Virginia, as the 
                      ``Patsy Cline Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PATSY CLINE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 132 North Loudoun Street, Suite 1 in Winchester, Virginia, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Patsy Cline Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Patsy 
Cline Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 187

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1444

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 132 North Loudoun Street, Suite 1 in Winchester, Virginia, as the 
                      ``Patsy Cline Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 16, 2021

                       Reported without amendment
```
Kenneth Leon MORROW v. STATE

CR-15-1207

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 24-3082 September Term, 2024

1:24-cr-00121-CRC-1

Filed On: September 9, 2024

United States of America,

Appellee

v.

Stephen Michael Baker, also known as

Stephen Baker,

Appellant

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Millett, Pillard, and Pan, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the memoranda of law and fact filed by the parties. 

The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion.

See D.C. Cir. Rule 36. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s June 3, 2024, order

denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration be affirmed. The district court did not

abuse its discretion in denying that motion. See United States v. Trabelsi, 28 F.4th

1291, 1297 (D.C. Cir. 2022). Because appellant failed to timely argue that the district

court could not impose pretrial release conditions without holding a detention hearing,

we review that argument for plain error. See United States v. Hunt, 843 F.3d 1022,

1029 (D.C. Cir. 2016). In that regard, the district court did not plainly err because

appellant has identified no “controlling precedent on the issue or some other ‘absolutely

clear’ legal norm.” United States v. Pyles, 862 F.3d 82, 88 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting

United States v. Nwoye, 663 F.3d 460, 466 (D.C. Cir. 2011)); see also, e.g., Olmos v.

Holder, 780 F.3d 1313, 1325 (10th Cir. 2015) (noting that prosecutors may seek

release conditions “without a detention hearing”); United States v. Fidler, 419 F.3d

1026, 1028 (9th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (explaining that 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c), “which

governs the procedures for issuing a release order, does not direct that a full hearing
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 24-3082 September Term, 2024

following the guidelines set out in § 3142(f) be held either before or after the release

order is issued”). Nor did the district court clearly err in maintaining the conditions that

appellant not possess a firearm and that he notify the Pretrial Services Agency before

traveling to Washington, D.C. See United States v. Hale-Cusanelli, 3 F.4th 449,

454–55 (D.C. Cir. 2021).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the

resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See

Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has det ermined t hat this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20790

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JULIO ANTONIO ALVAREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-H-94-281-1

September 20, 1996

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The government does not argue that the plea agreement signed by Julio Antonio Alvarez

waives his right to appeal his sentence. S ee Yohey v. Co llins

, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Alvarez has failed to show t hat the government breached the plea agreement by relying on his

assertion that he was unwilling to testify without giving him an opportuni ty to refuse to testify in open

court. U nited States v. Garcia-Bonilla

, 11 F.3d 45, 46-47 (5th Cir. 1993); see also United States v.2

Laday

, 56 F.3d 24, 25-26 (5th Cir. 1995). The government’s motion to supplement the reco rd is

DENIED AS MOOT.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of**

**Chief Executive Officer**

**of TGC Industries, Inc. Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

This certification isfurnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-KSB (the “Form10-KSB”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of TGC Industries,Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Wayne A.Whitener, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, to the bestof my knowledge:

 

(1)                    TheForm 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                    Theinformation contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: | March 23,  2005 |
|--------|----------------------|
|   |                 |
|   | /s/                  | Wayne A.  Whitener |   |
|   |                 | Wayne A.  Whitener |
|   |                 | Chief Executive  Officer |
|        |                      |  |  |  |

 

1

----
EX PARTE Alice E. CERF

(In re: Alice E. Cerf v. James A. Cerf)

2160321

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. granted.