alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APR 21, 2011

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-11980 

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 9:09-cv-82303-CMA

Case No. 07-11010-BKC-PGH

IN RE:

ERNEST W. WILLIS, 

lllllllllllllllllllll Debtor.

__________________________________________________________________

ERNEST W. WILLIS,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

DEBORAH MENOTTE,

RED REEF, INC.,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(April 21, 2011)
Before PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

Ernest W. Willis appeals the judgment that assets in three of his retirement

accounts are not exempt from his bankruptcy estate. The Bankruptcy Code

provides an exemption for “retirement funds to the extent that those funds are in a

fund or account that is exempt from taxation under section 401, 403, 408, 408A,

414, 457, or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.” 11 U.S.C. §

522(b)(3)(C). The bankruptcy court and the district court determined that Willis

engaged in several prohibited transactions under section 408 of the Internal

Revenue Code and caused the assets to lose their tax-exempt status. 26 U.S.C. §§

408(e)(2), 4975(c)(1). All of Willis’s arguments on appeal lack merit, and he has

failed to establish that the bankruptcy court committed any reversible error. We

affirm based on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court. 

The judgment against Willis is AFFIRMED. 

Honorable W. Keith Watkins, United States District Judge for the Middle District of *

Alabama, sitting by designation.

2
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1152 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to grants for buses 

and bus facilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2021 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to 

grants for buses and bus facilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Green Buses for Every 

5 Community Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOW INCOME COMMUNITY GRANTS. 

7 Section 5339(c) of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1) by adding at the end the 

10 following: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1152 IH

1 ‘‘(H) the term ‘low-income community’ 

2 means any population census tract if— 

3 ‘‘(i) the poverty rate for such tract is 

4 at least 20 percent; or 

5 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a tract— 

6 ‘‘(I) not located within a metro7 politan area, the median family in8 come for such tract does not exceed 

9 80 percent of statewide median family 

10 income; or 

11 ‘‘(II) located within a metropoli12 tan area, the median family income 

13 for such tract does not exceed 80 per14 cent of the greater statewide median 

15 family income or the metropolitan 

16 area median family income.’’; and 

17 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(6) LOW AND MODERATE COMMUNITY

19 GRANTS.—Not less than 10 percent of the amounts 

20 made available under this subsection in a fiscal year 

21 shall be distributed to projects serving predomi22 nantly low-income communities.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 24.4
 
 STATE OF ARKANSAS       §
 COUNTY OF BENTON          §
 
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
 Know all men by these presents, that I, WILLIAM A. SWANSTON, a Director of AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact
deem appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 14th day of July, 2009.
 
 
 /s/ William A. Swanston
 WILLIAM A. SWANSTON
 
 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 
 Before me this 14th day of July, 2009, came WILLIAM A. SWANSTON, personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.
 
 
 /s/ Camille A. Hector
 NOTARY PUBLIC
# Allen W. Ross

At torney & Counselor at Law

142 W. 5 th Street | Rusk, Texas 75785 (physical) PO Box 528 | Jacksonville, TX 75766 (mailing) 903. 683.2454 (voice) ~ 866.576.5317 (fax)

allen@arossatty.com February 23, 2015

Certified Mail Receipt 7014 0510 0002 2996 6433 Mr. Justin Christian
TDCJ-ID #01951215 Bradshaw State Jail
P.O. Box 9000 Henderson, TX 75693

RE: Appeal of Probation Revocation Appellate Cause #12- 14

- 00 245- CR Twelfth Court of Appeals, Tyler, TX

Dear Mr. Christian:

Enclosed herewith please find the following documents:

1. T he clerk ’ s record; and
2. The reporter ’ s record.

Sincerely,

ALLEN W. ROSS

Enc.

c c: Twelfth Court of Appeals (without enclosures) ACCEPTED 12-14-00245-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 2/23/2015 11:58:19 AM

CATHY LUSK CLERK
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner** 

**v.**

**NEIL E. JOKELSON, Respondent**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 2126 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**No. 201 DB 2014**

**Attorney Registration No. 2 486**  **(Philadelphia)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

**AND NOW, this 15 th**  **day of January, 2015, there having been filed with this Court by Neil E. Jokelson his verified Statement o**  **f Resignation dated November 7, 2014, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of**  **the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Pa.R.D**  **.E. 215, it is ORDERED that the resignation of Neil E. Jokelson is acce**  **pted; he is**

**disbarred on consent from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and he shall**  **comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Responden t shall pay costs, if any, to the**  **Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).**
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SHIRLEY ENOS,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2015-7002

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 13-721, Chief Judge Bruce E. 

Kasold.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

SANDRA E. BOOTH, Columbus, OH, argued for claimant-appellant.

 ERIC PETER BRUSKIN, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also 

represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E.

KIRSCHMAN, SCOTT D. AUSTIN; Y. KEN LEE, RACHAEL 
 

BRANT, AMANDA BLACKMON, United States Department of 

Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and 

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
ex10-7.htm


    Exhibit
10.7

    


    


    Director
Fee Arrangements for 2009

    


     

    Each
director of Sound Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) also is a director of Sound
Community Bank (the “Bank”).  For 2009, each non-employee director
will receive an annual fee of $12,000, plus a meeting fee of $1,030 for each
Board Meeting attended for serving on the Bank’s Board of
Directors.  Directors are not compensated for their service on the
Company’s Board of Directors.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Tamera Brown, et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

v.

City of Cincinnati, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18cv412

Judge Dlott 

Magistrate Judge Litkovitz

DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED

MOTION FOR A TWO-WEEK

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A 

REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS 

RESPONSE TO THE MOTIONS 

FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

Defendants respectfully move for a two-week extension of time to December

23, 2019 to file their Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to the Motion for Judgment on the

Pleadings. The deadline is currently December 9, 2019. The grounds for this request is 

due to the undersigned counsel’s absence from the jurisdiction to attend to an out-ofstate family member’s medical illness. 

Counsel for the parties have conferred on this request and Plaintiffs’ counsel have

expressed that Plaintiffs do not object to an extension. Defendants have attached a 

proposed order to this motion.

Respectfully submitted,

PAULA BOGGS MUETHING (0080018)

CITY SOLICITOR

/s/ Shuva J. Paul

Shuva J. Paul (0088484)

Emily Smart Woerner (0089349)

Peter J. Stackpole (0072103)

801 Plum Street, Suite 214

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

(513) 352-4551

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 44 Filed: 11/27/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 581
shuva.paul@cincinnati-oh.gov

emily.woerner@cincinnati-oh.gov

peter.stackpole@cincinnati-oh.gov

Trial Attorneys for Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 27, 2019, a true and accurate copy of the 

foregoing was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by 

operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. No copies of this filing are being

mailed to any parties, as all parties are currently being served via the Court’s electronic 

filing system and thereby may access this filing through that system. 

/s/ Shuva J. Paul

Shuva J. Paul (0088484)

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 44 Filed: 11/27/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 582
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0135

_________________ ISAAC DUPUIS,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ST ATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE DIVISION; UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BO ARD,

Defendants and Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to pro vide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Molly Owen , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 27 2023

09/27/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0135
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0517

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DONALD LEROY HARRIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 21, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2024

09/13/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0517
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                                <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999          JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                          49,581               49,581
<SECURITIES>                    32,603               32,603
<RECEIVABLES>                  233,295              233,295
<ALLOWANCES>                     7,545                7,545
<INVENTORY>                          0                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     0                    0
<PP&E>                               0                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                       0                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 340,589              340,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                0                    0
<BONDS>                        133,897              133,897
<COMMON>                            70                   70
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0                    0
<PREFERRED>                     26,200               26,200
<OTHER-SE>                      91,218               91,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   340,589              340,589
<SALES>                              0                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                13,272               24,347
<CGS>                                0                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   500                1,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               4,724                9,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  5,549                9,252
<INCOME-TAX>                     2,137                3,562
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              3,207                5,485
<DISCONTINUED>                       0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0                    0
<CHANGES>                            0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                     3,207                5,485
<EPS-BASIC>                      .46                  .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .45                  .76



</TABLE>
SERVED NOVEMBER 19, 2010 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SI PING YE 

FAA DOCKET No CPlOEAOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS FAA-2010-0976 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

OERARTMENT OF 

rHNSPORIATlON 

'-;" T OPERATIONS 

:!9 MOV i q p 2: 3S 

The Complaint of Complainant Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") was filed on October 1, 2010. Respondent Si Ping Ye (hereinafter 

"Respondent") had filed a Request for Hearing on September 22, 2010. 

On November 3, 2010, Respondent withdrew its Request for Hearing and 

requested dismissal, citing settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings imder this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and 
::r. 

wh 

2. This proceeding be eeid ijs, with prejudipe. 

Attachment - Service List 

odwin 

trative Law Judge 

f" 

i I • 

• ' M 
FAA Docket No. CPlOEAOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Robert H. London, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Offices of Robert H. London 

9550 Flair Drive, Suite 301 

El Monte, CA 91731 

TEL: 626-575-9200 

Leonid Talisman, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3403 

FAX:' 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EX PARTE Carl Michael SEIBERT

CR-15-1486

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ROBERT SMITH,

Appellant

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOSH SHAPIRO, 

HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, AND 

SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-BENNER, 

ROBERT MARSH,

Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 61 MAP 2018

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 420 MD 

2018 dated September 27, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: June 18, 2019

AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2019, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is 

REVERSED. Bundy v. Wetzel, 184 A.3d 551 (Pa. 2018) (holding that, to satisfy an 

inmate’s right to due process, before the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) can begin 

deducting funds from an inmate’s prison account for purposes of Act 84, it must inform 

the inmate of: (1) his financial liability; (2) the DOC’s policy for deducting funds from 

prisoner accounts, and (3) his right to object to the application of the DOC’s policy to his 

account); Petition to Stop 20% Deduction for Court Costs, Fines and Restitution from Gifts 

from Family and Friends, and the Return of Money Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 8127, 

6/6/2018, at ¶2 (averring that, upon Appellant’s confinement, the DOC began deducting 

funds from Appellant’s prison account “without notification”). The matter is REMANDED

for further proceedings.
#### People v McGee,

No. 90842;

Court of Appeals No. 123414.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



|(1) | The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | November 14, 2003
|----- | -----------------



/s/ Fred B. ParksFred B. Parks Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Todd E. PaulsonTodd E. Paulson Vice President, Finance and Controller
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Dr. Tressa R. Glover, :

:

Plaintiff(s), :

: Case Number: 1:18cv515

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

Great American Insurance Company of 

Cincinnati, OH, et al., :

:

Defendant(s). :

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Karen L. Litkovitz filed on July 31, 2018 (Doc. 5), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such

objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired August 14, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report and

Recommendation.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) that an appeal of any Order adopting the

Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith. Therefore, plaintiff is DENIED leave to

appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of

Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F. 3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v.

United States Postal Serv., 105 F. 3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134997 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

TINA SUMMERS, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 134997 

 COA: 269824 

Genesee CC: 05-081687-CZ 

HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER, PATHOLOGY 

ASSOCIATES, P.C., GARY JOHNSON, 

CATHY O. BLIGHT, JERRY S. KRZNARICH, 

and LINDA BIEDRZYCKI,

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

MARCIA E. PERRY,

Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0205 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 8, 2008 

 Clerk
CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Eric L. Sorkin

Eric L. SorkinPresident and Chief Executive Officer