alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcos De JESUS-ZEFERINO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50253

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 18, 2017 *

Filed January 24, 2017

Christopher Alexander, Helen H. Hong, Colin M. McDonald, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Marks, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before; TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Marcos De Jesus-Zeferino appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the nine-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

De Jesus-Zeferino claims that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address his arguments for a low-end sentence. We disagree. The record reflects that the court considered De Jesus-Zeferi-no’s arguments and sufficiently explained its reasons for concluding that a mid-range sentence was warranted. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

De Jesus-Zeferino’s unopposed motion to take judicial notice of the presentence report is granted.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


To the Board of Directors New World Brands, Inc.

We hereby consent to the use of our report dated July 15, 2003 accompanying the
consolidated financial statements of New World Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries
(formerly known as Oak Tree Medical Systems Inc.) included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004, which is incorporated by
reference in the Registration Statement Forms S-8 dated April 23, 2002, May 16,
2002 and July 22, 2003.


                                        /s/ WISS & COMPANY LLP


Livingston, New Jersey
August 26, 2004
#### Young v. People's Loan & Investment Company.

Opinion delivered July 1, 1929.

*911*J. M. Shinn,*for appellant.

*Pryor, Miles*& *Pryor,*for appellee.

*912Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is first contended that the judgment should be reversed because there is not sufficient evidence that the plaintiff is a corporation. According to the testimony of Lee Sims, he had been secretary-treasurer of the company ever since its incorporation, about five years *ago. It is well*settled in this State that parol evidence is admissible to show corporate existence. *Kelley*v. *Stern Publishing & Novelty Co.,*147 Ark. 383, 227 S. W. 609, and *Edwards*v. *State,*171 Ark. 778, 84 S. W. 1041, and cases cited. Besides this, no effort was made to contradict the testimony of Lee Sims in this respect, and the plaintiff was treated throughout the trial as a corporation. Having ignored the matter in the court below, it is too late to raise the question now. *Allen West Commission Co.*v. *People’s Bank,*74 Ark. 41, 84 S. *W.*1041.

According to the evidence for the plaintiff, it purchased the note two or three days after the execution of the conditional sales agreement and the note given for the balance of the purchase price of the automobile. Plaintiff purchased the note two or three days after its execution, and paid a valuable consideration therefor. The defendant paid the first installment of the note, and there is nothing whatever in the record to show that the plaintiff had any sort of knowledge of facts that would lead te>‘ knowledge of any defect in the paper sued on. Before the fraudulent character óf a transaction may defeat negotiable paper in the hands of a third person, a purchaser for value, evidence must first be introduced to show that the person was not an innocent purchaser. *McClain*v. *Patterson,*177 Ark. 544, 7 S. W. (2d) 8. It is plain, from the testimony of Lee Sims, that when he said “good consideration,” he meant ‘‘valuable consideration.” There was no' effort whatever made to show that the plaintiff was no>t an innocent purchaser, and the evidence for the plaintiff showed that it was an innocent purchaser for value before maturity of the note. Therefore we are of the opinion that the court did not err in direct-*913rug a verdict for the plaintiff. It follows that the judgment must he affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4611-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-4611-DR), dated August 29, 2021, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued December 14, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of August 29, 2021.

    Ascension, Assumption, East Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, 
Iberville, Livingston, Pointe Coupee, St. Helena, St. Martin, St. 
Mary, and West Feliciana Parishes for permanent work [Categories C-
G] (already designated for Individual Assistance and assistance for 
debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and 
B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance 
program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02260 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Odell HALL, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3300

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Brian M. CHIPMAN, DOC #R16382, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2742

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Billy C. BOWEN v. STATE

CR-15-1304

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Darren Edward STINESPRING, Appellant, v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, Appellee.

No. 1D17-696

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2018

Mitch Dever, Panama City, for Appellant.

Michael T. Ruff of Padgett Law Group, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wetherell and Winsor, JJ., concur.
EX PARTE DiAngelo FREEMAN

CR-16-0307

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Jefferson Cir. Ct., Bessemer Div.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 13, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-13-1997
<CASH>                                       3,857,387
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,138,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                    77,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,611,844
<PP&E>                                     290,340,678
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,107,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             288,265,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,998,912
<BONDS>                                    172,959,703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,985,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               288,265,515
<SALES>                                     39,148,612
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,110,695
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,899,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,218,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,103,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,035,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,068,948
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,068,948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1261 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1261

 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
 reauthorize the Ohio & Erie National Heritage Canalway, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2021

Mr. Ryan (for himself, Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, and Ms. 
   Kaptur) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
 reauthorize the Ohio & Erie National Heritage Canalway, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF OHIO & ERIE NATIONAL HERITAGE CANALWAY.

    Division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 
1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4274; 122 Stat. 824; 122 Stat. 826; 
127 Stat. 3801; 127 Stat. 420; 128 Stat. 314; 133 Stat. 778) is 
amended--
            (1) in section 809, by striking ``2021'' and inserting 
        ``2036''; and
            (2) in section 810(a), by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Brooke PULLIN v. Linda A. CHAUVIN, BST Leasing, Inc. and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

NO. 2018-C-0572

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000800460
<NAME>                        California Micro Devices Corporation
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            480
<SECURITIES>                                    5,110
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (380)
<INVENTORY>                                     8,092
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19,755<F1>
<PP&E>                                         25,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,599)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 35,994<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,208
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       53,011
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,384)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   35,994<F3>
<SALES>                                        32,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               33,043<F4>
<CGS>                                          24,701
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  24,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,406<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                941
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,005)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,005)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)

<FN>
<F1>Includes - Other Assets $987K.
<F2>Includes - Restricted cash $2,909K; and Other long-term assets $405K.
<F3>Includes - Long-term debt, less current maturities $7,185K; and Capital
      lease obligations less current maturities $974K.
<F4>Includes - Technology related sales $569K.
<F5>Includes - Research and development $3,017K; Selling, marketing
      and administrative $7,900K; Interest (income) $(403)K; and Other
      (income)/expense, net $(108)K.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert V. Dickinson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 (this Amendment) to annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, of California
Micro Devices Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this
Amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Amendment; and



3. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this Amendment, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Amendment.



Date: June 30, 2005



|    |  |                                                                     
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/ ROBERT V. DICKINSON                                             
|    |  | Robert V. Dickinson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Richard OUELLETTE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. In re: ESTATE OF Sarah Hester EDWARDS, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4036

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 25, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed because of the appellant's failure to satisfy this court's October 11, 2017, fee order.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 33 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 33

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment 
      Opportunity Commission relating to ``Update of Commission's 
                       Conciliation Procedures''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2021

 Mr. Scott of Virginia submitted the following joint resolution; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment 
      Opportunity Commission relating to ``Update of Commission's 
                       Conciliation Procedures''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating 
to ``Update of Commission's Conciliation Procedures'' (86 Fed. Reg. 
2974; published January 14, 2021), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132196 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132196 

 COA: 270887

 Oakland CC: 2005-204116-FH 

CLAY GREGORY NORTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant the application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth 

in her dissenting statement in People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006) 

MARKMAN, J., would grant the application for leave to appeal for the reasons set 

forth in his dissenting statement in People v Wright, 474 Mich 1138 (2006). 

s0130 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 2, 2007 

Clerk
# Nimitz Sailors Receive First Dose of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine

## From Petty Officer 2nd Class Sarah Christoph, USS Nimitz (CVN 68) Public Affairs 

More Details            Command Master Chief David Conduff, assigned to USS Nimitz (CVN 68), receives the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine aboard Nimitz. Nimitz is currently in port preparing for future operations.                        210406-N-QW460-1093                            Command Master Chief David Conduff, assigned to USS Nimitz (CVN 68), receives the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine aboard Nimitz. Nimitz is currently in port preparing for future operations.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Jennifer BenedictVIRIN: 210406-N-QW460-1093The first of the two-dose vaccine was distributed by the ship’s medical department while pierside in its homeport of Bremerton.Capt. Joshua Wenker, executive officer of Nimitz, said distribution of the vaccine is vital to mission readiness because it will keep Sailors and their families healthy, allowing the ship to maintain operations.    “Vaccinations will ensure the good-health of Sailors and their families and will also reduce all of the restriction of movement requirements that come with executing important events, like training and PCS (Permanent Change of Station),” said Wenker. “The vaccine will keep the force and the families ready.”Nimitz Command Master Chief David Conduff was among the first to receive the vaccine aboard the ship.“I chose to get vaccinated because I wanted to be a leader who can show our Sailors that this vaccine is important for all of us to return back to normal,” said Conduff. “This is one of those important things, not just for me or for our Sailors, but for all of our families as well. It is important for me to get vaccinated in order to lead that charge and show that we all can do this to help each other out.”While highly encouraged, receiving the vaccine remains voluntary for all Navy personnel while under the Federal Drug Administration’s (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).“I think it’s okay that Sailors have the choice of getting vaccinated or not,” said Conduff. “There are some Sailors who do not feel up to getting vaccinated and that is their right. We enjoy our Sailors’ free thought. That is something they are allowed to have.”Approximately 3,000 vaccinations are expected to be administered to the Nimitz crew over a period of six days with a tentative seventh day as needed.Nimitz, the flagship of Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, recently returned to home port following a record-setting deployment spanning 340 days where the ship and crew conducted operations and exercises in the U.S. Third, Fifth and Seventh Fleets. Nimitz is undergoing planned maintenance at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard.
From: gthomas@bp.Guardian.com

To: Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/05/2012 08:16 AM

Subject: Guardian Fiberglass Kingman Furnace Test Report

- final

Ms. Fairchild,

Enclosed is an electronic attachment of the final Kingman Furnace Report in response to the October 28,

2011 Section 114 request.

In the abundance of caution, a complete copy was burned on a CD and has been mailed to you.

Our test company is working on entering the data into the EPA electronic reporting tool (ERT) Version 3

and I will forward the ERT to you when it arrives.

For your convenience in reviewing the data, the claim of confidentiality is not being asserted on for the

information in this test report.

Please let me know that you have received the information we are submitting to you.

Kind regards,

Grover Thomas

Environmental Manager

Guardian Fiberglass Inc.,

1000 E. North Street

Albion, Michigan 49224

Telephone: (517) 630

- 2700

Fax: (517) 630

- 2009

(See attached file: Guardian Kingman 114 ICR Report Final 022912.pdf) (See attached file: Guardian

Kingman 114 ICR Report Final 022912.pdf)
Robert JENKINS v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-16-0077

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.