alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6187-6188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3575-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-3575-EM), dated December 11, 2021, 
and related determinations.

[[Page 6188]]


DATES: This amendment was issued January 6, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective December 11, 2021.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02227 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 154 ) IV-C-12 1 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:59 AM Sheet 154 of 232P. 2

• < # •j*r . 

## JU LI I (98 8

Rr . Samue l Leonar d Aut o EmissionContro l Environmenta l Activitie s Staf f Genera l Motor s Corporatio n 3040 0 Hound Roa d Warren , H I 48090-901 5 Dea r Mr , Leonard : Thi s lette r i s i nrespons e t o a recen t phon e conversatio n wit hHr . Ji a Pase k o f you r staf f concernin g GM' c decisio n t o withhol d certai n Genera l Rotor s Unifor m?ea t Specification s (GMUTS ) fromou r review . i n April , 198 8 w e ha d requeste d copie s o f 1 9 specifi c tes t sequence s froma nextende d lis t o f test s whic hGl. had include d i nit s writte ncomment s o n ou r onboar d refuelin g contro l NPRtf . Th e listin g wa s include d i n th e GH comsent s i n respons e t o e questio nabou t ho wyo u tes t an d evaluat e you r vehicl e fue l system s fo r durability . Afte r reviewin g th e list , w e had identifie d thes e specifi c test s a s one s whic hseene d t o bea r -directlyo nevaporativ e and refuelin g controls . A t th e tim e o f our request , v e wer e informe d tha t copie s woul d be furnisher ? a s soo na s the ycoul d b e collected , althoug h the ynigh t h e submitte d a s G Mconfidentia l documents . Ther e hav e beer , severa l staf f contact s betwee nm ystaf f and your s sincf
- April , an

d cr . eac ho f thes e occasion s wc - hav e r»ee

n =ssure d tha t th e requeste d cocujp:;ntr vsr e bein g collected . On Jun e 3 , 193 5 wc wer e advise- ; tha t thf
- document s b.-v d bee n assemble d an

d woul d b e forwarde d withi n a few3ays . However , o n Jun o ?7 , 193. 3 w r wor- ? advis^ o h y?*r . Pase k tha t rSA had decide d t o withhel d ther e "ccurent' s frc p EPA . I a - writin g t o reques t th? . v~*.\ reconside r tni s decision , .in o provid e th e subjec t drjeurcent'-
- fo r ou r review . W e believ e •jha t thes e document s ar e i.-nportTn t fo r ou r ful l understandin g o f som e o f th e concern s abou t onboar d safet yand durabilit y whic hG

Mha s raised . Ti e ar e awar e tha t thes e issue s ar e importan t t o CF! , s o w e exrec t tha t yo u woul d desir e t o provid e •J E a s r.uc

hsupportin g factua l informatio n a s possible . Sinc e th e material s hav e no walreadybee ncollected , v e a}s o believ e cha t thi s reques t represent s n o significan t resourc e inpac t fo r• % -**? / 

### «SL»»c 

# Aue b^«°* -Sfi-p l *-Yy v P. 3

4* >P. 4 

### / v Becaus e o r th e tim e whichha s passe d sinc e ou r origina l reques t for thes e tes t procedures , ou r analysi s o f onboard safetyissue s i s alread ynearing completion . Therefore , we as k tha t you respon

d t o thi s reques t an d suppl ythe document s w e have identified at th e earlies t possibl e time .

,- 1 - :
' f 

### Sincerel yyours ,
Charle s L . Gray , Jr . Directo r Emission Contro l Technolog yDivision 6167 W

«-- ~ TL•*. . I -
FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0109 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 3 of 11
 

FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0109 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 4 of 11
FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0109 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 5 of 11




 

 

FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0109 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 10 of 11
FOIA Requested Record #J-15-0109 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 11 of 11
Opinion issued February 26 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

NO. 01
- 11
- 01029
- CV

PLASTICWARE, LLC , Appellant
V.
CONOCOPHILLIPS C OMPANY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1114971



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Plasticware, LLC , has failed to timely file a brief. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 38.6( a ) ( governing time to file brief ), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief).2 Appellant’s brief was first due on January 23, 2012. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1) (authorizing dismissal for failure to file brief); 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Chief Justice Radack and Just ices Higley and Brown.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2410

___________

Kathleen A. Cochrane, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

National Association of Letter *

Carriers, AFL-CIO, Local Division, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Branch 352; United States Postal *

Service, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: November 29, 2002

 Filed: December 3, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kathleen Cochrane brought this action against her former employer, the United

States Postal Service (USPS), and her former union, the National Association of

Letter Carriers, and its Local Division, Branch 352 (collectively NALC), alleging that

USPS had violated its collective bargaining agreement with NALC, and that NALC
1

The HONORABLE ROBERT W. PRATT, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

-2-

had breached its duty to fairly represent her. The district court1 granted summary

judgment to USPS and NALC, and Cochrane appeals. After careful review of the

record, we affirm.

The evidence before the district court did not create a genuine issue of material

fact on whether NALC had breached its duty of fair representation. First, the record

fails to show arbitrary conduct by NALC. Instead, the evidence demonstrates that

NALC investigated Cochrane’s claim, and concluded, based upon its interpretation

of the collective bargaining agreement and the circumstances of Cochrane’s case, that

she did not have a grievable complaint. Further, there is no evidence that NALC

acted in bad faith or with discriminatory intent. See Schmidt v. Int’l Bhd. of Elec.

Workers, Local 949, 980 F.2d 1167, 1170 (8th Cir. 1992).

As Cochrane was required to show a breach of the duty of fair representation

to prevail against either defendant, see Scott v. United Auto., Local 879, 242 F.3d

837, 840 (8th Cir. 2001), summary judgment was also appropriate on her claim

against USPS for breach of the collective bargaining agreement, see Buford v.

Runyon, 160 F.3d 1199, 1203 (8th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Amendment No. 1 to Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.23 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”),
dated as of January 1, 2009, to the Services Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) dated as of May 23, 2007, by and between SPECTRUM GLOBAL FUND ADMINISTRATION, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
(“Company”), on the one hand, and FUTURES STRATEGIC TRUST, a Delaware statutory trust (the “Client”), on the other hand. 
 W I T N E S S E T H : 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Client entered into the Original
Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Client desire to amend the Original Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment to the Original Agreement. The Company agrees that it shall not increase the Administrative Services Fee described in Section 3.1 of the Original Agreement and on Exhibit B to the
Original Agreement at any time prior to December 31, 2009. 
 2. Remainder of Original Agreement. Except as provided in Section 1
hereof, the Original Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect, and each reference to the Original Agreement and words of similar import in the Agreement, as amended hereby, shall be a reference to the Original Agreement as amended
hereby and as the same may be further amended, supplemented and otherwise modified and in effect from time to time. 
 3. Miscellaneous.

 (a) Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Original
Agreement. 
 (b) Entire Agreement. This Amendment No. 1 constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties hereto
with respect to its subject matter and supercedes all oral communication and prior writings (except as otherwise provided herein) with respect thereto. 
 (c) Amendments. No amendment, modification or waiver in respect of this Amendment No. 1 will be effective unless in writing (including a writing evidenced by facsimile transmission) and executed by each of
the parties hereto. 







 (d) Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed and delivered in counterparts
(including by facsimile), each of which will be deemed an original. 
 (e) Headings. The headings used in this Amendment No. 1
are for convenience of reference only and are not to affect the constructions of or be taken into consideration in interpreting this Amendment No. 1. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the day and year first written above. 
  

					
	CLIENT:
	
	FUTURES STRATEGIC TRUST
		
	By:	 	Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., it’s Managing Owner
		
	By:	 	/s/ Esther E. Goodman
		 	Name:	 	Esther E. Goodman
		 	Title:	 	Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	
	COMPANY:
	
	SPECTRUM GLOBAL FUND ADMINISTRATION, L.L.C.
		
	By:	 	Carol A. Burke
		 	Name:	 	Carol A. Burke
		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer

  

 2
Raphael GUILLORY, Jr. v. R & R CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al.

NO. 2018-C-0581

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

*1062Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages F-2 through F-4 of
the Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,716
<PP&E>                                          27,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    873,250
<COMMON>                                     5,801,049
<OTHER-SE>                                  (6,692,636)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,387
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,327
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               391,967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (332,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (332,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                544,410
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   212,384
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
Exhibit 32.2


                                  Certification
                       pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
            ---------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, I, Gary C. Parks, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                       /s/ Gary C. Parks
                       ------------------------------------------------
                       Gary C. Parks
                       Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
                       (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
                       August 5, 2005
12 December 2008

Chief, National Guard Bureau

Tomorrow the National Guard will celebrate its 372nd

Birthday and I take great pride in thanking our more than

470,000 Citizen Soldiers and Airmen for their dedication

and outstanding service to the Nation. Today's Guard men

and women continue the commitment and selfless service of

the first militiamen who banded together at a moment's

notice to defend their towns and colonies.

An established operational force, the National Guard's

duties range from emergency response and defending the

homeland to protecting our Nation's freedom and that of

countless others through our numerous, ongoing deployments

around the world.

I want to extend my deep appreciation to the families and

employers of our National Guard men and women; their

support is unfailing and, without their sacrifice, our

National Guard would not be the strong, agile and vigilant

institution that is today.

As we look to the future, we renew our non-negotiable

contract with America to answer the call. We pledge to

I continue our unwavering defense of our communities and our

. Nation.

~I\l~ C':;;~MCKinley 12.f'(\"~ General, USAF

Chief, National Guard Bureau
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1081 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1081

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 
        charitable contributions as an above-the-line deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2021

 Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. Cuellar) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 
        charitable contributions as an above-the-line deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Charitable Giving Tax Deduction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ALLOWED IN DETERMINING 
              ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 62(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by inserting after paragraph (7) the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(8) Charitable contributions.--The deduction allowed 
        under section 170.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 170(b)(1)(H) of such Code is 
amended by striking ``(computed without regard to any net operating 
loss carryback to the taxable year under section 172).'' and inserting 
the following: ``computed without regard to--
                            ``(i) section 62(a)(8), and
                            ``(ii) any net operating loss carryback to 
                        the taxable year under section 172.''.
    (c) Repeal of Superseded Provisions.--Section 212 of the Taxpayer 
Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2020 (other than subsection 
(c) thereof) is repealed and each provision of law amended by such 
section (other than such subsection) is amended to read as such 
provision would read if such section had never been enacted.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
#### Eric SUMTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee, and Alan Wilson, Respondent.

No. 17-6203

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 17, 2017

Decided: August 21, 2017

*99Eric Sumter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Sumter seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sumter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Sumter’s motion for a new trial and for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Chris A. Karkenny, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ CHRIS A. KARKENNY

Chris A. Karkenny
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the Securities and Exhange Commission
or its staff upon request.