alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1170 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1170

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1 League in Irvine, California, as the ``Tuskegee Airman Lieutenant 
       Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

Ms. Porter (for herself, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Garcia of California, Mr. 
Sherman, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Gomez, Mr. Peters, Ms. Brownley, 
 Ms. Speier, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Swalwell, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Costa, Mr. 
Lowenthal, Mr. Issa, Mr. Huffman, Mrs. Kim of California, Mr. Thompson 
  of California, Ms. Matsui, Mr. DeSaulnier, Ms. Chu, Mr. Vargas, Ms. 
 Barragan, Mr. Schiff, Ms. Bass, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Aguilar, 
  Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mrs. Torres of California, Mr. Bera, Ms. Lee of 
  California, Mr. Takano, Mr. McNerney, Mr. Levin of California, Mr. 
 LaMalfa, Mr. Ruiz, Ms. Jacobs of California, Mr. Correa, Mrs. Steel, 
   Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Valadao, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Lieu, Mr. Harder of 
California, Mr. Garamendi, and Mr. Obernolte) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1 League in Irvine, California, as the ``Tuskegee Airman Lieutenant 
       Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TUSKEGEE AIRMAN LIEUTENANT COLONEL ROBERT J. FRIEND MEMORIAL 
              POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1 League in Irvine, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Tuskegee Airman Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend 
Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tuskegee 
Airman Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882087
<NAME>                        CUMBERLAND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           6,828,206
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          1,222,378
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     110,313
<MORTGAGE>                                     939,702
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 9,540,838
<CASH>                                         1,201,173
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             4,217,964
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         1,963,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,501,072
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                4,760,997
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            5,774,368
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 913,586
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                2,130,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,872
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,501,072
<PREMIUMS>                                     5,508,366
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            271,933
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             270,067
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 904,030
<BENEFITS>                                     1,406,219
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    1,689,258
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           2,552,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,202,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                   402,091
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            800,405
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   800,405
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.14
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0




</TABLE>
Opinion filed March 24, 2011

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-11-00025-CR

__________

REED J. BATES, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1010552CR

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The trial court convicted Reed J. Bates of the offense of reckless driving and assessed 

punishment at confinement for thirteen days and a fine of $100. We dismiss the appeal. 

Appellant’s sentence was imposed on August 17, 2010. A timely motion for new trial 

was filed on August 31 and was overruled by operation of law pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 21.8. 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on November 29, 2010, 104 days after the date sentence 

was imposed. Upon receiving the clerk’s record, this court notified the parties by letter dated

February 14, 2011, that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that no motion for 
2

extension had been timely filed. We requested that appellant provide proof that a notice of 

appeal had been timely filed, and we informed appellant that the appeal may be dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. Appellant has not responded to our letter. 

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2), a notice of appeal is due ninety days after the day 

sentence is imposed. In this case, the due date was November 15, 2010. Appellant did not file a 

motion for extension of time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or 

the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain the 

appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

March 24, 2011

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement of Mel G. Brekhus



 EXHIBIT 10.33 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 to Employment
Agreement (this “Amendment”), made as of March 26, 2009, is by and between TEXAS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), and MEL G. BREKHUS (hereinafter referred to as the
“Employee”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, Employee and the Company have entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of January 19, 2007 (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, due to the economic conditions in the United States the Employee has volunteered to reduce his base salary by 10% effective on the first day of the Company’s next fiscal year, and
the Company has accepted his offer; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Employee, in consideration of the premises, do
hereby agree and covenant as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Definitions 


 Each capitalized term that is used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning prescribed in the Agreement. 
  

	 	2.	 Amendments 


 Section 2(a)(i) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 Base Annual
Compensation. Employee shall receive a base salary payable in periodic installments in accordance with the Company’s payroll practices and procedures as follows: 
 $600,000 per annum through May 31, 2009 
 $540,000 per annum from
June 1, 2009 through May 31, 2010 
 $600,000 per annum thereafter 
  

	 	3.	 Miscellaneous 


 All of the terms of the Agreement, as expressly amended by this Amendment, remain in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date shown
above. 
  

									
	ATTEST:	 		 	TEXAS INDUSTRIES, INC.
					
	By:	 	/s/ Frederick G. Anderson	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Sam Coats
		 	Frederick G. Anderson	 		 		 	Sam Coats, Chairman
		 	Secretary	 		 		 	 Compensation Committee of the
 Board of
Directors

			
		 		 	EMPLOYEE:
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Mel G. Brekhus
		 		 		 		 	Mel G. Brekhus

  

 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000799166
<NAME> MASSBANK CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,612
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,751
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               119,902
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 4,672
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    471,752
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             160
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               160
<LOANS>                                        249,661
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (2,237)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 888,237
<DEPOSITS>                                     788,350
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,271
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,429
<LONG-TERM>                                        937
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,476
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 888,237
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,414
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               32,341
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 6,354
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                58,109
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              33,062
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,062
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,047
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      160
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 868
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,428
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      15,428
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.96
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,601
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,601
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,529
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (542)
<RECOVERIES>                                        90
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,237
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,094
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            143
        

</TABLE>
FAA-2011-0478
#### LONG CHHANG; Sopheap Pen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee FOR RESIDENTIAL ACCREDIT LOANS, INC., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-QS5, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-1487

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 21, 2017

Filed: March 2, 2017

*503Long Chhang, Pro Se

Sopheap Pen, Pro Se

Jared D. Kemper, Dykema & Gossett, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee

Before COLLOTON, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Long Chhang and Sopheap Pen appeal pro se after the district court1 entered an adverse judgment following a bench trial in their action to quiet title. Upon careful review, we conclude the district court’s factual determination that Pen was served notice was not clearly erroneous. *See United States v. Missouri,*535 F.3d 844, 848 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
INFORMATION PAPER

NGB-AVS~SG
28 January 2002

SUBJECT: Army National Guard (ARNG) Indoor Firing Range (IFR)
Action Plan

1. Purpose. The purpose of this information paper is to
outline the ARNG IFR Action Plan, designed to reduce the number
of unsafe ranges. Additionally, it provides a brief description
of the critical milestones required for completion in support of
the plan.

2. Facts.

a. The IFR Action Plan was provided to the Department of
Defense Inspector General (DODIG) in response to their audit of
ARNG and U.S. Army Reserve small-arms indoor firing ranges
performed in 1998 (DODIG Report No. 98-170, and 99-250). See
attachment.

b. The DODIG reports are available for download or detailed
review at http://www. dodig.osd.mil/audit/reports/index. html,

c. Initially, each state will be required to report the
number of ranges, locations, status (Active/Inactive), and
whether the range has been decontaminated or cleaned prior to
closure.

d. Each state must assess their IFRs, and determine the
disposition and future use of each range. This includes
completion and submission of a Risk Assessment and Plan of
Corrective Actions for each range, as applicable.

e. NGB-AVS-SG will assist the states with review of Scopes
of Work, contracts, and Standing Operating Procedures for IFR
operations.

£. Procedural guidance for IFR cleaning, conversion,
rehabilitation, and closure are provided in All-States Policy
Memorandum P01-0075, which was released in December of 2001.

g. Fiscal responsibilities for cleaning of IFRs have not
been clearly identified. However, the aforementioned DODIG
reports identify specific funding requirements for both State
and Federally owned facilities.

[MR._LOTI/ 703-607-7779
APPROVED BY: LTC DENNIS A. BALITSKI
ERIKA C. WRIGHT, CSR

Official Court Reporter

210 th District Court

546

- 2130 Ext. 3600

ewright@epcounty.com

September 4 , 2018

Denise Pacheco, Clerk

Court of Appeals

Eighth District of Texas

500 East San Antonio Street, Suite 1203

El Paso, Texas 79901

Re: No. 08

- 18

- 00 084

- CR

Manuel Alejandro Valmana v. State of Texas

Dear Ms. Pacheco,

I, Erika Wright, received a notice of appeal and request for record in the above

styled and referenced cause

. The due date was July 1, 2018 from the notice that I have

in front of me. I did receive a call from COA today and I believe the due date was later

August. Either way, I am not finished with this record. I am producing a capital murder

up on appeal. I believe I ’ m on my last extension, and it is due September 19, 2018.

Would you please allow an extension in this matter ? I would a sk for 30 days if

possible. I know that the capital murder w ill take the rest of September

. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me with any questions

regarding this matter.

/s/Erika C. Wright

Erika C. Wright, CSR

Official Court Reporter



### 210th District Court
Rushawn COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2750

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee 

    for the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust: 

 

We are aware that XTO Energy Inc. has incorporated by reference in its Registration Statement Nos. 33-55784 and 333-91460 on Form S-8, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,which includes our report dated July 15, 2004, covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration statementprepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

July 16, 2004
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glacier Water Services, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. David Walters, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                  
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of
the Company for the periods indicated.

|/s/ W. DAVID WALTERS                                                                | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                    | 
|W. David Walters Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 8, 2002 |
Exhibit 31.1



California Micro Devices

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert V. Dickinson, Principal Executive Officer



I, Robert V. Dickinson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A (this Amendment) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, of
California Micro Devices Corporation, a California corporation; and



2. Based
on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this Amendment;



Date: September 2, 2004



|    |  |                                                                   
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /S/ ROBERT V. DICKINSON                                           
|    |  | Robert V. Dickinson,                                              
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
# United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-40838 Conference Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus
Daniel Mendoza,
Defendant—Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18-CR-188-1

Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Mendoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40838 Document: 00515588023 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/02/2020No. 19-40838

2 allow us to make a fair evaluation of Mendoza’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Mendoza’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R . 42.2. Case: 19-40838 Document: 00515588023 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/02/2020
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, E. Thomas Hart, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of QuickLogic Corporationon Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of QuickLogic Corporation.
|        | By:    | /s/ E. Thomas Hart        |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Date:  | May 10, 2007              |
|   | Name:  | E. Thomas Hart            |
|   | Title: | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

I, Carl M. Mills, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of QuickLogic Corporationon Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of QuickLogic Corporation.
|        | By:    | /s/ Carl M. Mills         |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Date:  | May 10, 2007              |
|   | Name:  | Carl M. Mills             |
|   | Title: | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----