5552 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 

27 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3See Rules 5005(a)(11) (defining a Dually-Listed 

Security as a security, listed on The Nasdaq Global 

Market or The Nasdaq Global Select Market, which 

is also listed on the New York Stock Exchange). As 

explained below, former Rule 5910(c)(5) described 

and set forth the fees applicable to a Dually Listed 

Company but referenced only The Nasdaq Global 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– 

Phlx–2022–03 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File No. 

SR–Phlx–2022–03. This file number 

should be included on the subject line 

if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

internet website (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of the Exchange. All comments 

received will be posted without change. 

Persons submitting comments are 

cautioned that we do not redact or edit 

personal identifying information from 

comment submissions. You should 

submit only information that you wish 

to make available publicly. All 

submissions should refer to File No. 

SR–Phlx–2022–03, and should be 

submitted on or before February 22, 

2022. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.27

J. Matthew DeLesDernier, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01973 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–94071; File No. SR– 

NASDAQ–2022–004] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The 

Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of 

Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of 

Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 

Exchange’s Listing Fees at Rule 

5910(b) To Adopt a $15,000 AllInclusive Annual Listing Fee 

Applicable to a Dually-Listed Company 

January 26, 2022. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on January 

13, 2022, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC 

(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed 

rule change as described in Items I, II, 

and III, below, which Items have been 

prepared by the Exchange. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend the 

Exchange’s listing fees at Rule 5910(b) 

to insert language concerning a $15,000 

annual listing fee applicable to a Dually 

Listed Company, which was 

erroneously removed, as described 

further below. 

The text of the proposed rule change 

is detailed below: Proposed new 

language is italicized and proposed 

deletions are in brackets. 

* * * * * 

The Nasdaq Stock Market Rules 

* * * * * 

5910. The Nasdaq Global Market 

(including the Nasdaq Global Select 

Market) 

(a) No change. 

(b) All-Inclusive Annual Listing Fee 

(1) No change. 

(2)(A)–(F) No change. 

(G) Dually-Listed Companies, whose 

securities are listed on the New York 

Stock Exchange and designated as 

national market securities pursuant to 

the plan governing New York Stock 

Exchange securities at the time such 

securities are approved for listing on 

Nasdaq: $15,000. Such fee shall be 

assessed on the first anniversary of the 

Company’s listing on Nasdaq, and 

annually thereafter on the anniversary 

of the Company’s listing. If an issuer of 

such securities ceases to maintain its 

listing on the New York Stock Exchange 

that portion of the fee described in this 

section attributable to the months 

following the date of removal shall not 

be refunded, except if the securities 

remain listed on the Nasdaq Global or 

Global Select Markets and are 

designated as national market securities 

pursuant to the plan governing Nasdaq 

securities such fee shall be applied to 

The Nasdaq Global Market All-Inclusive 

Annual Listing Fee due for that calendar 

year. 

(3) No change. 

* * * * * 

The text of the proposed rule change 

is available on the Exchange’s website at 

https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/ 

rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at the principal 

office of the Exchange, and at the 

Commission’s Public Reference Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

Exchange included statements 

concerning the purpose of and basis for 

the proposed rule change and discussed 

any comments it received on the 

proposed rule change. The text of these 

statements may be examined at the 

places specified in Item IV below. The 

Exchange has prepared summaries, set 

forth in sections A, B, and C below, of 

the most significant aspects of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The purpose of the proposed rule 

change is to insert language concerning 

the relevant all-inclusive annual fee 

applicable to the listing of securities 

that are listed on the New York Stock 

Exchange and designated as national 

market securities pursuant to the plan 

governing New York Stock Exchange 

securities at the time such securities are 

approved for listing on the Nasdaq 

Global or Global Select Markets, and 

maintains such listing and designation 

after it lists such securities on Nasdaq 

(‘‘Dually-Listed Securities’’).3 Such 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 5553 

Market. Nasdaq proposes to clarify that a Dually 

Listed Company may list on the Nasdaq Global or 

Global Select Markets. 

4Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84634 

(November 20, 2018), 83 FR 60522 (November 26, 

2018) (SR–NASDAQ–2018–092) (The ‘‘Annual Fee 

Transition Filing’’). 

5Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73647 

(November 19, 2014), 79 FR 70232 (November 25, 

2014) (SR–NASDAQ–2014–87). 

6The Annual Fee Transition Filing, supra note 4. 

7Former Rule 5920(c)(8) also included similar 

language about the fee for a Dually Listed Company 

on the Nasdaq Capital Market. However, under Rule 

5005(a)(11) and IM–5220 companies are not (and 

were not previously) permitted to dually list on the 

Nasdaq Capital Market. As such this Capital Market 

fee was inapplicable to any companies and its 

deletion was appropriate. 

8See former Rule 5910(b)(5) and 5910(f). 

9See former Rules 5602, 5810(c) and 5910(e). In 

Nasdaq’s experience, Dually Listed Companies are, 

typically, established companies that are used to 

being a public company and familiar with the 

exchanges’ requirements thus rarely having a need 

to pay for written interpretation, compliance plan 

review and record-keeping fees. 

10Under Rule 5910(b)(2)(A) the minimum allinclusive annual fee for most companies is $48,000. 

11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). 

language was erroneously deleted in a 

previous filing.4

In 2014, Nasdaq adopted an allinclusive annual listing fee schedule to 

simplify, clarify and enhance 

transparency around the annual fee to 

which listed companies are subject.5

The new annual fee schedule became 

operative on January 1, 2015, and 

applied to all companies listed after that 

date. Effective January 1, 2018, all 

Nasdaq-listed companies became 

subject to the all-inclusive annual fee 

schedule and the standard annual fee 

schedule ceased to have applicability or 

effect for such companies. 

In 2018, Nasdaq eliminated expired 

and obsolete provisions in connection 

with Nasdaq’s completed transition to 

the all-inclusive annual fee program.6 In 

the Annual Fee Transition Filing 

Nasdaq deleted the language in former 

Rules 5910(c)–(f) and 5920(c)–(e) that 

described and set forth the standard 

annual fee. However, former Rules 

5910(c)(5) described and set forth the 

fees applicable to a company (i) whose 

securities are listed on the New York 

Stock Exchange and designated as 

national market securities pursuant to 

the plan governing New York Stock 

Exchange securities at the time such 

securities are approved for listing on 

Nasdaq, and (ii) that maintains such 

listing and designation after it lists such 

securities on Nasdaq (a ‘‘Dually Listed 

Company’’). The rule language further 

stated that if an issuer of such securities 

ceases to maintain such listing and 

designation and the securities are 

instead designated under the Rule 5400 

Series, that portion of the fee described 

in this section attributable to the months 

following the date of removal shall not 

be refunded, except such fee shall be 

applied to annual listing fee due for the 

calendar year of the transfer. In lieu of 

the annual fees applicable to a Nasdaqlisted company, a Dually Listed 

Company annual fee was set at $15,000 

per year. Such annual fee was set to be 

assessed on the first anniversary of the 

Company’s listing on Nasdaq.7 While 

not identical to the current all-inclusive 

annual listing fee schedule, this 

provision was similar in that companies 

also were not subject to fees for listing 

additional shares or for substitution 

listing events.8 The companies were still 

subject to fees in relation to request for 

written interpretation, compliance plan 

review and record-keeping. The 

foregoing fees are included in the allinclusive annual fees and Dually Listed 

Companies will pay only a single 

annual fee to Nasdaq, which includes 

all the ordinary costs of listing for the 

year.9

Nasdaq believes it is appropriate to 

maintain the $15,000 fee on an allinclusive basis because it is not the 

primary listing venue for such 

companies. The Dual Listing program 

was originally designed, and continues 

to operate, to encourage NYSE-listed 

companies to compare services 

provided by Nasdaq and NYSE without 

creating undue burden by assessing 

duplicated fees. As required by Listing 

Rules, Nasdaq monitors Dually Listed 

Companies for compliance with the 

Nasdaq listing standards. In that regard, 

based on Nasdaq’s experience, Dually 

Listed Companies require less time and 

effort to review and to ensure 

compliance because they seldom 

involve time-consuming regulatory 

issues. This is, in part, due to the fact 

that NYSE listed companies are already 

subject to the ongoing scheme of 

regulation by the NYSE that is fairly 

similar to the Nasdaq’s regulation 

regime. 

Notwithstanding the similarities in 

regulatory regimes, the Dual Listing 

program increases the regulatory burden 

on a listed company, in part, by 

subjecting it to both the NYSE’s and 

Nasdaq’s corporate governance 

regulations. As a result, the program 

targets bigger and better established 

companies that are used to being a 

public company and can afford a 

moderate increase in the regulatory 

burden. Nasdaq believes that these 

larger companies will pay higher listing 

fees if and when they become listed 

exclusively on Nasdaq and become 

subject to the fee schedule applicable to 

Nasdaq listed companies thereby 

making their listing more valuable to 

Nasdaq. Nasdaq also believes that 

inducing these companies to compare 

services provided by Nasdaq and the 

NYSE, may encourage these companies 

to list exclusively on Nasdaq and to 

provide its listing market broader 

benefits from attracting the larger, better 

known companies that are listed on the 

NYSE. Accordingly, given the 

competitive nature of the dual listing 

program and the potential benefits it 

may bring to Nasdaq and its listing 

market, Nasdaq believes it is reasonable 

to set the all-inclusive annual fee for 

Dually Listed Companies at $15,000. 

Absent this provision, a Dually Listed 

Company would be subject to the 

typical all-inclusive annual listing fee, 

which is higher than $15,000.10 Nasdaq 

did not intend to subject the Dually 

Listed Companies to the all-inclusive 

annual listing fee applicable to other 

companies. Accordingly, Nasdaq now 

proposes to insert language, similar to 

the language covering annual fees paid 

by Dually Listed Companies that was 

erroneously removed, by adding 

proposed Rule 5910(b)(2)(G) setting the 

all-inclusive annual fee for Dually 

Listed Companies, which now covers 

fees for written interpretation, 

compliance plan review and recordkeeping fees, previously not covered as 

explained above, at $15,000. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The Exchange believes that its 

proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) 

of the Act,11 in general, and furthers the 

objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) 

of the Act,12 in particular, in that it 

provides for the equitable allocation of 

reasonable dues, fees and other charges 

among members and issuers and other 

persons using any facility, will promote 

just and equitable principles of trade, 

and will remove impediments to and 

perfect the mechanism of a free and 

open market and a national market 

system, and is not designed to permit 

unfair discrimination between 

customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. 

The proposed rule will insert language 

concerning the $15,000 annual listing 

fee applicable to a Dually Listed 

Company, which Nasdaq erroneously 

deleted, while also making this fee an 

all-inclusive fee, which now covers fees 

for written interpretation, compliance 

plan review and record-keeping fees, 

previously not covered as explained 

above. The Commission previously 

approved the $15,000 annual fee 

applicable to a Dually Listed Company, 

and the manner in which it is assessed, 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
5554 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 

13Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51005 

(January 10, 2005), 70 FR 2917 (January 18, 2005) 

(SR–NASD–2004–142, approving the predecessor 

NASD rule), 70 FR 2917 (January 18, 2005) (the 

‘‘Approval Order’’). This finding was under Section 

15A(b)(5) and (6) of the Act, which applied to 

Nasdaq at the time as a facility of the NASD. 14See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93862 

(December 22, 2021), 86 FR 74198 (December 29, 

2021) (SR–NYSE–2021–76). 15Although the all-inclusive annual fee for Dually 

Listed Companies will now include some 

additional services for the same $15,000 annual fee, 

Nasdaq notes that Dually Listed Companies, 

typically, do not use these services. See footnote 9 

above. 

16Nasdaq believes that national securities 

exchanges other than the NYSE do not have 

established listing programs that attract marquee 

operating companies and therefore the dually listed 

program will not have any competitive impact on 

such exchanges because the goal of the program is 

to allow an established exchange-listed company to 

compare services provided by Nasdaq with those it 

already receives. 17 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 

and found it consistent with 

requirements of the Act that rules 

provide for equitable allocation of 

reasonable fees and not be designed to 

permit unfair discrimination between 

issuers.13 There has been no changes to 

the objectives of the Dual Listing 

program since Nasdaq adopted the allinclusive annual listing fee schedule for 

companies, and the NYSE annual fee 

schedule has been changing to 

accommodate the shifts in the 

competitive landscape.14 Nasdaq 

believes that, to maintain consistency 

with the original objective of the Dual 

Listing program, the annual listing fee 

assessed towards Dually Listed 

Companies, noting the fact that they are 

paying the fees to the NYSE, should 

remain the same as previously adopted, 

although now covering fees for written 

interpretation, compliance plan review 

and record-keeping fees, previously not 

covered as explained above. The 

erroneous removal of language 

describing the fee, resulting in the need 

for this rule filing to reinsert it, does not 

change that conclusion.15

Nasdaq believes it is appropriate and 

not unfairly discriminatory to maintain 

the $15,000 fee on an all-inclusive basis 

because Nasdaq is not the primary 

listing venue for such companies. The 

Dual Listing program is designed to 

encourage NYSE-listed companies to 

compare services provided by Nasdaq 

and the NYSE without creating undue 

burden by assessing duplicated fees. 

Based on Nasdaq’s experience, Dually 

Listed Companies require less time and 

effort to review and to ensure 

compliance because they seldom 

involve time-consuming regulatory 

issues. This is, in part, due to the fact 

that NYSE listed companies already are, 

and, typically, have been subject to the 

ongoing scheme of regulation by the 

NYSE that is fairly similar to the 

Nasdaq’s regulation regime. 

Notwithstanding the similarities in 

regulatory regimes, the Dual Listing 

program increases the regulatory burden 

on a listed company, in part, by 

subjecting it to both NYSE and Nasdaq 

corporate governance regulations. As a 

result, the program targets bigger and 

better established companies that are 

used to being a public company and can 

afford the increased regulatory burden. 

Nasdaq believes that these larger 

companies will pay higher listing fees if 

and when they become listed 

exclusively on Nasdaq and become 

subject to the fee schedule applicable to 

Nasdaq listed companies thereby 

making their listing more valuable to 

Nasdaq. Nasdaq also believes that 

inducing these companies to compare 

services provided by Nasdaq and the 

NYSE, may encourage these companies 

to list exclusively on Nasdaq and to 

provide its listing market broader 

benefits from attracting the larger, better 

known companies that are listed on the 

NYSE. 

Finally, Nasdaq believes that the 

proposal does not result in unfair 

discrimination by offering its program 

only to companies already listed on the 

NYSE, and not on other exchanges, 

because Nasdaq believes attracting the 

NYSE-listed companies will bring 

greater future value to Nasdaq. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposed rule change will impose 

any burden on competition not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act but instead 

will reinstate a portion of the fee 

schedule that was erroneously deleted. 

Nasdaq’s dual listing program is 

designed to allow issuers to undertake 

focused comparison of the services and 

market quality offered by Nasdaq and 

NYSE, with the explicit goal to 

encourage eventual switch of companies 

that dual list. Without a lower annual 

fee, an NYSE-listed company would be 

unlikely to choose to dually list its 

securities, either initially or on an 

ongoing basis. Accordingly, reinstituting 

the proposed fee would promote 

competition among listing markets.16

The lower fees on Dually Listed 

Companies also will not burden 

competition between Dually Listed 

Companies and other companies listing 

on Nasdaq. The lower fee reflects that 

Dually Listed Companies are also 

subject to ongoing fees to the NYSE. In 

the Approval Order, the Commission 

found the fees applicable to Dually 

Listed Companies consistent with the 

requirements of the Act, and noted that 

‘‘[w]ithout this program, it is unlikely 

that an issuer would choose to dually 

list its securities’’ and expressed its 

believe that ‘‘competition among listing 

markets has the potential to benefit the 

public, issuers, and the listing markets.’’ 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

No written comments were either 

solicited or received. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing rule change has become 

effective pursuant to Section 

19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.17

At any time within 60 days of the 

filing of the proposed rule change, the 

Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in 

the public interest; (ii) for the protection 

of investors; or (iii) otherwise in 

furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 

If the Commission takes such action, the 

Commission shall institute proceedings 

to determine whether the proposed rule 

should be approved or disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

NASDAQ–2022–004 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–NASDAQ–2022–004. This 

file number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

internet website (http://www.sec.gov/ 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 5555 

18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549 on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of the Exchange. All comments 

received will be posted without change. 

Persons submitting comments are 

cautioned that we do not redact or edit 

personal identifying information from 

comment submissions. You should 

submit only information that you wish 

to make available publicly. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–NASDAQ–2022–004, and 

should be submitted on or before 

February 22, 2022. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.18

J. Matthew DeLesDernier, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01969 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice: 11643] 

Notice of Public Meeting in Preparation 

for International Maritime Organization 

SSE 8 Meeting 

The Department of State will conduct 

a public meeting at 1:00 p.m. on 

Thursday, February 17, 2022, to prepare 

for the eighth session of the 

International Maritime Organization’s 

(IMO) Sub-Committee on Ship Systems 

and Equipment (SSE 8). SSE 8 will be 

held remotely from Monday, February 

28, 2022 to Friday, March 4, 2022. This 

public meeting will be held by way of 

Microsoft Teams. Members of the public 

may participate up to the capacity of the 

Microsoft Teams meeting, which can 

handle 1,000 participants. To RSVP, 

participants should contact the meeting 

coordinator, LCDR Sarah Rodin ̃ o, by 

email at Sarah.E.Rodino@uscg.mil. 

LCDR Rodin ̃ o will provide log in 

information for Microsoft Teams. 

Members of the public may also 

participate via a phone conference by 

calling (410) 874–6752 and using 

Conference ID 552 073 07#. 

The agenda items to be considered at 

the public meeting mirror those to be 

considered at SSE 8, and include: 

—Adoption of the agenda 

—Decisions of other IMO bodies 

—New requirements for ventilation of 

survival craft 

—Consequential work related to the 

new International Code for Ships 

Operating in Polar Waters 

—Revision of SOLAS chapter III and the 

LSA Code 

—Review of SOLAS chapter II–2 and 

associated codes to minimize the 

incidence and consequences of fires 

on ro-ro spaces and special category 

spaces of new and existing ro-ro 

passenger ships 

—Amendments to Guidelines for the 

approval of fixed dry chemical 

powder fire-extinguishing systems for 

the protection of ships carrying 

liquefied gases in bulk (MSC.1/Circ. 

1315) 

—Development of amendments to the 

LSA Code and resolution of 

MSC.81(70) to address the in-water 

performance of SOLAS lifejackets 

—Requirements for onboard lifting 

appliances and anchor handling 

winches 

—Development of amendments to 

SOLAS chapter II–2 and the FSS Code 

concerning detection and control of 

fires in cargo holds and on the cargo 

deck of containerships 

—Development of amendments to 

SOLAS chapter II–2 and MSC.1/Circ. 

1456 addressing fire protection of 

control stations on cargo ships 

—Development of provisions to prohibit 

the use of fire-fighting foams 

containing perfluorooctane sulfonic 

acid (PFOS) for fire-fighting on board 

ships 

—Validated model training courses 

—Revision of the Code of Safety for 

Diving Systems (Resolution 

A.831(19)) and the Guidelines and 

specifications for hyperbaric 

evacuation systems (resolution 

A.692(17)) 

—Unified interpretation of provisions of 

IMO safety, security and 

environment-related conventions 

—Biennial status report and provisional 

agenda for SSE 9 

—Election of Chair and Vice-Chair for 

2023 

—Any other business 

—Report to the Maritime Safety 

Committee 

Please note: The IMO may, on short 

notice, adjust the SSE 8 agenda to 

accommodate the constraints associated 

with the virtual meeting format. Any 

changes to the agenda will be reported 

to those who RSVP and those in 

attendance at the meeting. 

Those who plan to participate may 

contact the meeting coordinator, LCDR 

Sarah Rodin ̃ o, by email at 

Sarah.E.Rodino@uscg.mil, or in writing 

at 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, 

Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593– 

7509. Members of the public needing 

reasonable accommodation should 

advise LCDR Sarah Rodin ̃ o not later 

than February 9, 2022. Requests made 

after that date will be considered, but 

might not be possible to fulfill. 

Additional information regarding this 

and other IMO public meetings may be 

found at: https://www.dco.uscg.mil/ 

IMO. 

(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2656 and 5 U.S.C. 552) 

Emily A. Rose, 

Coast Guard Liaison Officer, Office of Ocean 

and Polar Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01963 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Intent of Waiver With Respect 

to Land; Rickenbacker International 

Airport, Columbus, Ohio 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is considering a 

proposal to change approximately 328 

acres of airport land from aeronautical 

use to non-aeronautical use and to 

authorize the lease and ultimate sale of 

airport property located at Rickenbacker 

International Airport, Columbus, Ohio. 

The aforementioned land is not needed 

for aeronautical use. The property is 

located southeast of the airfield and 

currently consists of vacant land, paved 

roadways, fencing and utilities. The 

land is proposed to be used to expand 

the Rickenbacker Global Logistics Park 

(RGLP) and all activities necessary to 

prepare the site as a Cargo Campus for 

development capable of accommodating 

growth in bulk warehouse/distribution 

facilities. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 3, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for 

review by appointment at the FAA 

Detroit Airports District Office, Mark 

Grennell, Program Manager, 11677 

South Wayne Road, Suite 107, Romulus, 

MI 48174, Telephone: (734) 229–2933/ 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE