alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of DirectorsMarten Transport, Ltd.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-81494, 33-75648 and 333-128168) on Form S-8of Marten Transport, Ltd. of our reports dated March 14, 2008, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of Marten Transport, Ltd. andsubsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the relatedfinancial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31,2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Marten Transport, Ltd.

 

                                                                                                                /s/KPMG LLP

 

Minneapolis, MinnesotaMarch 14, 2008

 

----
Richard MCMILLIAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2865

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 13, 2018

Richard McMillian, Orlando, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Ventures Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarter ended March 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Shannon Masjedi, the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/
    Shannon Masjedi                                                                        | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Shannon
    Masjedi                                                                            | 
|President,
        Chief Executive Officer and
        Interim
        Chief Financial Officer | 



Date:
January 30, 2020



This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU

ORGANIZATIONAL NAME/TITLE

STANDARDIZED STREET ADDRESS

CITY, STATE, AND ZIP + 4 CODE

OFFICE SYMBOL 01 November 2018

MEMORANDUM THRU National Guard Bureau Office of Leglislative Liaison (NGB-LL), 

1636 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1636

FOR Assistant Secretary of Defense Legislative Affairs (OSD-LA), 1636 Defense Pentagon, 

Washington, DC 20301-1636

SUBJECT: ORIENTATION FLIGHT REQUEST FROM STATE NATIONAL GUARD

1. Reference DoDD 4515.12. DoD Support for Travel of Members and Employees of Congress. 

2. Request approval to authorize travel/in-theater airlift for the following Congressional Member

on behalf of the Department of Defense. This request is for sponsored, non-reimbursable travel 

based on review of the following information:

3. Roster: John Smith, Senator (Party, State)

4. Itinerary: 01JAN180800 – W/U – Airport, City, State

01JAN180830 – W/D – Airport, City, State

5. Provide a purpose statement here ending with this sentence: The flight is in conjunction with a 

previously scheduled flight and will be conducted at no additional cost to the U.S. Government.

The justification for the flight should be robust, especially if requesting an ETP. 

6. Mode of travel and cost: One (1) UH-72A military aircraft with a total estimated cost of $100.

7. This request is IAW Department of Defense Directive 4515.12 criteria authorizing members 

of Congress to travel on board DoD assets.

8. For questions regarding this request, please contact Jane Smith at (111)111-1111 or 

jane.smith.mil@mail.mil.

AUTHORITY LINE:

JOHN W. SMITH

Major General

The Adjutant General
Tammy Lee HOOD v. James Douglas HOOD

2160083

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Cason vs. The State.

An issue of fact, in a criminal proceeding, cannot be submitted to the court — a jury must try all issues of fact on indictments.

*Appeal from Chicot Circuit Court.*

Hon. John C. Murray, Circuit Judge.

Garland & Randolph, for the appellant,

referred to *Cooper vs.*State, and *Wilburn vs. State,*20 *Ark.) Buzzard vs. State,*20 *Ark.*106.

Hollowell, Attorney General, contra.

Mr. Justice Compton,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an indictment for retailing spirituous liquors contrary to the statute. The appellant pleaded in abatement, and upon his plea an issue of fact was made up and submitted to the court for trial, sitting as a jury. The court found the issue for the State, and fined the appellant twenty-five dollars, for which, with costs, final judgment was rendered. This, according to the decision of this court in *Cooper vs. The State,*21 *Ark.*228, and the authorities there cited, was erroneous. The issue of fact should have been tried by jury, and not by the court. Let the judgment be reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 31 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 31

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2021

Mr. Smith of New Jersey submitted the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for men and women.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied 
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    ``Section 3. Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant or 
secure any right relating to abortion or the funding thereof.
    ``Section 4. This amendment shall take effect two years after the 
date of ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,
vs. : CIVIL NO: 1:18-CV-560
: JUDGE BARRETT
: MAGISTRATE JUDGE LITKOVITZ
JULIE CURRAN,
Defendant.

ORDER

Upon Motion of Plaintiff and for good cause shown, the time for establishing service of
process upon Defendant Julie Curran is hereby extended to and including March LS WY.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Wn Sis Se" te

DATE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATBJUDGE
# Official Journal L 187/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 187 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6019 July 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 187

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6019 July 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1283 of 30 August 2016 on State aid SA.38373 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by Ireland to Apple
  (notified under document C(2017) 5605)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1283 of 30 August 2016 on State aid SA.38373 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by Ireland to Apple
  (notified under document C(2017) 5605)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2017) 5605)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Amendment to Advisory Agreement dated March 25, 2009




 Exhibit 10.20 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ADVISORY AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 to Advisory Agreement is executed this 25th day of March, 2009 by and between Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., a
Maryland corporation (the “Company”) and Strategic Storage Advisor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”). 
 WHEREAS, the Advisor and the Company are parties to that certain Advisory Agreement dated March 17, 2008, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference (the “Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Advisor and the Company, by mutual consent, have renewed the Agreement on March 24, 2009, effective until March 17, 2010;

 WHEREAS, the Advisor and the Company desire to amend the Agreement to revise the definition of “Capped O&O Expenses”,
in order to incorporate the original intention of the Advisor and the Company; 
 NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the
premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Effective as the date hereof, the definition of “Capped O&O Expenses” in Article I of the Agreement entitled “Definitions” is hereby amended in its entirety
as follows: 

 “Capped O&O Expenses” means all Organizational and Offering Expenses (excluding Sales Commissions
and the dealer manager fee) in excess of 3.5% of the Gross Proceeds raised in a completed Offering other than Gross Proceeds from Stock sold pursuant to the Distribution Reinvestment Plan.” 
  

	2.	Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect, and are ratified and
confirmed by this reference. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to Advisory
Agreement to be effective for all purposes as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	 THE COMPANY:
  
 STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/ H. Michael Schwartz
		 	 H. Michael Schwartz
 President



  

			
	 THE ADVISOR:
  
 STRATEGIC STORAGE ADVISOR, LLC

		
	By:	 	/s/ H. Michael Schwartz
		 	 H. Michael Schwartz
 President
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT I, Jack H. Brown, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 11, 2004/s/ Jack H. Brown

Jack H. Brown
Chairman of the Board, President,
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

SEAN ZEIGLER, 

Petitioner, : Case No. 1:18-cv-580 

- vs - District Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

WARDEN, 

 Lebanon Correctional Institution 

 

 : 

 Respondent. 

 ORDER STRIKING OBJECTIONS 

 

 This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by Petitioner Sean Zeigler, is before the Court on 

Zeigler’s Objections (ECF No. 35) to the Magistrate Judge’s Report (ECF No. 33) recommending 

denial of Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 32). 

 Petitioner filed his Objections August 24, 2023, the date he deposited them in the prison 

mailing system PageID 1981. This date of deposit is corroborated by the postmark of the same 

date. See PageID 1982. 

 Petitioner asserts his Objections are timely because he was not served with the Report until 

August 4, 2023. PageID 1957. Presumably that is the date on which Petitioner actually received 

the Report. However, as he was notified, the date of service of the Report is the date it was sent, 

not the date it was received. See Notice Regarding Objections, PageID 1954 which reads in part: 

“under Fed.R.Civ.P. 6, . . . service is complete when the document is mailed, not when it is 

received.” The docket reflects that he Report was mailed by the Clerk July 12, 2023, which would 

Case: 1:18-cv-00580-MRB-MRM Doc #: 36 Filed: 09/01/23 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1983
2 

make objections due July 29, 2023. 

 Petitioner also claims the Objections are timely because he filed a motion for extension of 

time July 28, 2023. PageID 1957. However, no such motion has been received and docketed by 

the Clerk, much less granted by the Court. 

 Accordingly, the Objections are STRICKEN as untimely. 

August 31, 2023. 

 s/ Michael R. Merz

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 1:18-cv-00580-MRB-MRM Doc #: 36 Filed: 09/01/23 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1984
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 668 

Commemorating the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center’s 50th 

Anniversary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 6, 2020 

Mrs. LOEFFLER (for herself and Mr. PERDUE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the Federal Law Enforcement Training 

Center’s 50th Anniversary. 

Whereas the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center 

(‘‘FLETC’’) was established on July 1, 1970, in response 

to a need for standard training across Federal law enforcement agencies; 

Whereas the FLETC headquarters in Glynco, Georgia, 

opened in 1975; 

Whereas FLETC became a part of the Department of Homeland Security on March 1, 2003, pursuant to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (P.L. 107–296); 

Whereas, in 2016, Congress passed, and the President signed 

into law, FLETC’s first authorizing legislation, the FedVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:56 Aug 07, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR668.ATS SR668

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 668 ATS 

eral Law Enforcement Training Centers Reform and Improvement Act of 2015 (P.L. 114–285); 

Whereas FLETC provides basic and advanced law enforcement training for 95 Federal law enforcement agencies 

and to State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies 

nationwide; 

Whereas FLETC includes training locations in Glynco, Georgia, Artesia, New Mexico, Charleston, South Carolina, 

and Cheltenham, Maryland; 

Whereas the mission of FLETC is to prepare the Federal law 

enforcement community to safeguard the people of the 

United States, our homeland, and our values through 

strategic partnerships; and 

Whereas FLETC trains nearly 70,000 law enforcement personnel annually in 872 training programs and maintains 

more than 3,400 acres of training ground: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the 50th anniversary of the Fed3 eral Law Enforcement Training Center; and 

4 (2) recognizes the staff, students, and leader5 ship of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Cen6 ter for their commitment to preparing law enforce7 ment to protect the people of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
No. 32.2








CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, John P. Cosaert, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of
Heartland Express, Inc., on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Heartland Express,
Inc.








Dated:
      February 24, 2010
            By:
      /s/ John P.
CosaertJohn
      P. CosaertExecutive
      Vice President-Financeand
      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
    RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Jenkins, the Chief Executive Officer of SAN Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Company;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) [Paragraph reserved];

      (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's fourth fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

(5) I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2005                 By: /s/ John Jenkins
      --------------                    -------------------------------------
                                        John Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer