alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,052,259
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,097,524
<PP&E>                                             360,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                     296,917
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,161,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              301,999
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            52,193
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,161,303
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    56,102
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,111,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (97,395)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (957,716)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (957,716)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.19)



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**I, Phillip J. Smith, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 13, 2008        /s/Phillip J. Smith  Phillip J. Smith   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Gabrielle DANIEL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2771

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1170 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1 League in Irvine, California, as the 

‘‘Tuskegee Airman Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1170 EH

1 SECTION 1. TUSKEGEE AIRMAN LIEUTENANT COLONEL 

2 ROBERT J. FRIEND MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 

3 BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1 League in Irvine, California, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tuskegee Airman 

7 Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office 

8 Building’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

12 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tuskegee Airman 

13 Lieutenant Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office 

14 Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 

2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1170 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. Colonel Robert J. Friend Memorial Post Office fornia, as the ‘‘Tuskegee Airman Lieutenant al Service located at 1 League in Irvine, Cali-
STATE of Louisiana v. Kyle James TOUPS

NO. 2017-K-1363

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2018

*1231Denied.
Case: 2:18-mj-00635-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/23/18 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 2:18-mj-00635-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/23/18 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 2:18-mj-00635-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/23/18 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                        7780000
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 9336000
<ALLOWANCES>                  (1000000)
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              16222000
<PP&E>                        289116000
<DEPRECIATION>                (162677000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                150506000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         45730000
<BONDS>                       100000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      243000
<OTHER-SE>                    2284000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  150506000
<SALES>                       9171000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              9171000
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 12085000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            2711000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (5625000)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (5625000)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (5625000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.24)
        


</TABLE>
# Sheet1

mailto:Darrell.i.beck.mil@mail.miltel:(619)%20384-9806tel:614.336.4477
EX PARTE Lawrence LARSON

CR-15-1209

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 82 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF REVISED VERSION OF ‘‘BLACK 

4 AMERICANS IN CONGRESS, 1870–1989’’. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—An updated version of House 

6 Document 101–117, entitled ‘‘Black Americans in Con7 gress, 1870–1989’’ (as revised by the Library of Con8 gress), shall be printed as a House document by the DirecVerDate Sep 11 2014 16:42 Sep 21, 2022 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 Z:\XMLBILLS\HC82.EH NODE
2 

•HCON 82 EH 

1 tor of the Government Publishing Office, with illustrations 

2 and suitable binding, under the direction of the Committee 

3 on House Administration of the House of Representatives. 

4 (b) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual 

5 number, there shall be printed such number of copies of 

6 the document referred to in subsection (a) as does not ex7 ceed a total production and printing cost of $500,000, of 

8 which— 

9 (1) 80 percent shall be for the use of the Com10 mittee on House Administration of the House of 

11 Representatives; and 

12 (2) 20 percent shall be for the use of the Com13 mittee on Rules and Administration of the Senate. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 82 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of a revised and updated 

Americans in Congress, 1870–1989’’. version of the House document entitled ‘‘Black
#### Commissioner of Labor, C. R. Thornbrough *v.*Danco Construction Company.

5-1052

294 S. W. 2d 336

Opinion delivered October 22, 1956.

*798
      *Karlin J. Perryman,*on reply brief, only, for appellant.

*John B. Thurman, Mehaffy, Smith*& *Williams*and *B. S. Clark,*for appellee.

Lee Seamster, Chief Justice.

On January 10, 1956, appellant, C. R. Thornbrough, Commissioner of Labor for the State of Arkansas, served a subpoena on appellee, Danco Construction Company, commanding its representative to appear in the offices of the State Labor Department on January 13, 1956, and show cause for ap-pellee’s failure to produce certain books and payroll records which had been requested by the Commissioner. The subpoena also directed appellee to produce its payrolls and other records, showing the name, address, and occupation of each person employed by appellee on the waterworks extension project at Camden, Arkansas; and further, the daily and weekly hours worked by each such person, and the wages paid each pay period to each such person.

On January 13, 1956, the appellee filed a Petition for "Writ of Certiorari in the Pulaski Circuit Court, Third Division, seeking a review of the Commissioner’s actions, and on the same day the Commissioner filed a Petition for Attachment on the subpoena. The appellee filed an answer to the Petition for Attachment, alleging that Act 115 of 1955 was not applicable to the project referred to in the subpoena since the waterworks extension project was not a taxing agency.

The matters were consolidated and on March 22, 1956, the trial court entered an order dismissing the cause, holding that the Camden Municipal Waterworks System, under operation by the Waterworks Commission, was not a taxing agency within the purview of Act 115 of 1955. This appeal follows.

*799For reversal, the appellant alleges that there is no requirement that a municipality, city, or town or other agent of the state be a taxing agency in order to come within the application of Act 115 of 1955.

At the outset we are confronted with an insufficient abstract by appellant, and have concluded that the order of the trial court must be affirmed for this reason. The appellant has failed to abstract the record in this case as required by Supreme Court Rule 9 (d) and consequently this court is not afforded an understanding of the questions to be resolved. In this case appellant did not abstract the pleadings or the decree, and there is nothing in the entire brief upon which the judges of this court could confidently say that the decree of the trial court should be reversed. The several judges of this court are not required to make an individual search of the record, particularly in the absence of proper references thereto, in order to arrive at a decision, and it certainly is not practical to do so.

Constitutional questions are never decided unless necessary, however, we feel that it is necessary to point out that this court recently held that Act 115 of 1955 was unconstitutional. See *Crowly*v. *Thornbrough, Commissioner of Labor,*Ark., 294 S. W. 2d 62.

Accordingly the decree of the trial court is affirmed.
Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW     Document 161      Filed 01/07/2008     Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS

United States of America

-vs- Case No. 2:18-cr-147

Bilal A. El Yousseph

COURTROOM MINUTES

JUDGE: Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers DATE AND TIME: July 20, 2018

at 1:30 PM

DEPUTY CLERK: Sherry Nichols COUNSEL FOR GOVT: Peter Glenn-Applegate

RECORD: CourtSmart COUNSEL FOR DEFT(S).

INTERPRETER: PRETRIAL/PROBATION: Shelly Singleterry

Initial Appearance

-Dft advised of rights, penalties, and charges

-Dft completed a CJA financial affidavit; Counsel to be appointed

-Government requests detention

-Detention hearing set for July 24, 2018 at 11:30 AM 

-Dft remanded

Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 8 Filed: 07/20/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 13
Stevie TATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2112

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6227-6228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11644]


Notice of Determinations; Additional Culturally Significant 
Objects Being Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Persia: 
Ancient Iran and the Classical World'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: On January 28, 2020, notice was published on page 5065 of the 
Federal Register (volume 85, number 18) of determinations pertaining to 
certain objects to be included in an exhibition entitled ``The 
Classical World in Context: Persia.'' Notice is hereby given of the 
following determinations: I hereby determine that certain additional 
objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their 
foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the retitled 
exhibition ``Persia: Ancient Iran and the Classical World'' at The J. 
Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Villa, Pacific

[[Page 6228]]

Palisades, California, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that 
their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c1f090f180503025e5859552c1f180d1809420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c1f090f180503025e5859552c1f180d1809420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-02205 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18D0060. LESTER SMITH v. THE STATE.

Lester Smith was found guilty of malice murder and other crimes and was

sentenced to life imprisonment on the murder charge. The Supreme Court affirmed

his convictions on appeal. Smith v. State, 290 Ga. 768 (723 SE2d 915) (2012). Smith

later filed a motion to modify his sentence, which the trial court denied. He now

seeks discretionary review of that ruling in this Court.

Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over

“[a]ll cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.” See Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be

imposed for the crime of murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. See

OCGA § 17-10-30 (b); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012)

(Hunstein, C. J., concurring);see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524 (322 SE2d 711)

(1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a sentence of death

or of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of murder”). Accordingly,

this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 29, 2017

08/29/2017
Gary HARRISON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0410

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 6, 2018

Gary Harrison, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Vinodh RAGHUBIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3593

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### Parker vs. The State.

*Error to Yell Circuit Court.*

Reversed for the same reasons, and on the same grounds expressed in the case of Hopper just decided.

Absent, Mr. Justice Scott.
ARNG 4.0 is a new era for the Army National Guard. During this period, the 

requirements of service in our organization are changing. Many of our Soldiers are 

training more often and will be absent from civilian jobs, Families and schools for longer periods of 

time. Under ARNG 4.0, employer support becomes even more critical as training schedules and 

deployment tempo shifts over time.

Background

ARNG 4.0 was born of necessity. With a smaller active-duty Army, there are higher readiness and 

training expectations placed on the Reserve Components. The Army National Guard is taking steps to 

increase combat readiness and decrease our response time should we be called upon to fight 

overseas. This is a break from past practice when mobilizations and deployments were forecasted as 

far as two years in advance, and our units could train together for several months before shipping 

overseas. The emerging threats to our Nation no longer allow us the luxuries of time and space. 

Employer expectations

How long will my employee(s) be gone? When will they deploy overseas?

Their absence from work varies on a year-to-year basis depending upon the needs of the Department 

of Defense. Our force contains Soldiers with a diverse array of capabilities, professions and skills 

including combat units, combat support and sustainment units. All of these specialties are needed in 

the opening phases of any future conflict. The Army’s leadership – including the Army National Guard -

is developing innovative means, processes, and ways to provide our Soldiers the maximum amount of 

predictability, however, the threats of today simply do not allow for the same level of predictability seen 

in the past.

The Future of ARNG 4.0

Is this a permanent change?

ARNG 4.0 formally recognizes that many of our Soldiers have been training more than the traditional 

“one weekend a month” for over a decade. To help them balance work, Family life and Army 

requirements, personnel may be assigned to units with a faster, or slower, training tempo on an 

alternating basis. Offering this flexibility to Soldiers is the best way to mitigate stress.

Relief for employers

What can the government do to help?

The leadership of the Army National Guard understands that community support - especially from 

employers - is essential to the success of ARNG 4.0. Defense Department programs like Employer 

Support of the Guard and Reserve (ESGR) promote cooperation and understanding between civilian 

employers and their National Guard and Reserve employees. National Guard leadership will work with 

policymakers to improve existing programs such as ESGR and develop additional innovations to 

encourage and motivate employers to hire and retain Guardsmen. As an indispensable pillar of support 

for Soldiers, civilian employers must have the right tools to hire, grow and maintain a strong workforce 

comprised of Citizen-Soldiers for the future.

EMPLOYER COMMUNICATION

 ARNG 4.0
Leroy ERVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4229

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.