alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02180]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Flight Path Management Advisory Circular

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of a draft advisory 
circular on flight path management. The FAA invites public comment on 
AC 120-FPM.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on these proposed documents by 
March 7, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The draft AC 120-FPM can be viewed and comments submitted 
through the FAA Draft Documents website.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Jackson, Flight Standards, Air 
Transportation Division, Training and Simulation Group (AFS-280), 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#703a1f031805115e3a11131b031f1e301611115e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dc96b3afb4a9bdf296bdbfb7afb3b29cbabdbdf2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 267-8166. Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Loss of control inflight remains one of the 
leading causes of accidents. One of the factors that contributes to 
these accidents is a flightcrew's failure to manage the flight path of 
the aircraft. The vulnerabilities of flightcrew automation management 
have been studied for more than two decades with major improvements in 
design, training, and operational use of onboard systems for flight 
path management. Despite these improvements, there are still 
vulnerabilities that should be addressed.

Background

    The Air Carrier Training Aviation Rulemaking Committee Steering 
Committee established the Flight Path Management Work Group in 2018 and 
has since submitted numerous recommendations to the FAA. The FAA 
developed this advisory circular (AC) based on those recommendations, 
and it contains guidance and recommended practices for flight path 
management that can be incorporated into training programs and 
operational procedures. Flight path management topics addressed in this 
advisory circular include manual flight operations, managing automated 
systems, pilot monitoring, and energy management.

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites public comments on the AC concerning flight path 
management. The FAA will consider the public comments submitted during 
this comment period through the FAA's Draft Documents website in 
finalizing AC 120-FPM.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Robert C. Carty,
Deputy Executive Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-02180 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

CHRISTOPHER WEST, : Case No. 3:18-cv-245
Plaintiff, : District Judge Walter H. Rice
: Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of
Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
(Doc. #17). Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees
in the amount of $3,800.00 in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims
Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. The award shall satisfy all of
Plaintiffs claims for fees, costs, and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case.
Prior to Plaintiff filing an EAJA petition, the parties jointly reached a resolution to
settle EAJA fees in this case. The parties’ Stipulation represents a compromise on
disputed positions and is not intended to set precedent for, or a representation of, any
specific hourly rate or total number of hours.

Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and not his attorney, and can be offset to

satisfy pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the United States under Astrue v. Ratliff,


130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). After entry of the award, if Defendant can verify
that Plaintiff does not owe a preexisting debt to the government subject to offset,
Defendant will direct payment of the award to Plaintiff's attorney pursuant to the
EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and counsel. Plaintiff's attorney has consented
to the amount and method of payment.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney's Fees
under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #17) is accepted
and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees, costs,
and expenses in the total amount of $3,800.00;

2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this
Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-
existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such
pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award
directly to Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to a valid EAJA
assignment; and

3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 -aS-49 Le See

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

Appellee

______________________

2018

- 2067

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017

-

00037.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

C RAIG R. K AUFMAN , TechKnowledge Law Group LLP,

Redwood City, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented

by J ERRY C HEN

.

N AVEEN M ODI , Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC,

argued for appellee. Also represented by P AUL A NDERSON

, C HETAN B ANSAL

, S TEPHEN B LAKE K INNAIR D

, J OSEPH P ALYS

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK

, R EYNA

, and H UGHES

, Circuit

Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 6, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132209 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132209 

 COA: 260597 

Saginaw CC: 03-023907-FC 

ERIC ANTHONY DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

JOHN PEROTTI,

Petitioner, Case No. 1:18-cv-477

- vs - District Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

RON ERDOS, Warden,

Southern Ohio Correctional Facility,

 

Respondent.

DECISION AND ORDER

This habeas corpus case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations of 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 24). Upon the filing of that Report, Petitioner 

was notified of his right to object and of the time limits for doing so. Id. at PageID 461. 

Despite having sought and received an extension of time to object, Petitioner has not done 

so.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendations are ADOPTED. The Clerk will 

enter judgment dismissing the portions of the Petition attacking Petitioner’s federal 

conviction for lack of jurisdiction and the remaining portions of the Petition attacking 

Petitioner’s parole revocation as duplicative of claims made in Case No. 1:18-cv-446. 

Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner is denied a 

certificate of appealability on the habeas corpus claims and the Court certifies to the Sixth 
2

Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be 

permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

July 29, 2019.

 s/ Timothy S. Black

 Timothy S. Black

 United States District Judge
Brent Adam DOVE v. STATE

CR-15-1130

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Current as of December 2021

Learn more at www.nationalguard.mil

Point of Contact: NGB Public Affairs at (703) 601-6767

Highlights

• Joint service program that allows sharing of

resources and manpower

• Includes all 50 states, three territories, and

the District of Columbia

• Enables communities in need of support to 

receive aid from Military Reserve 

components at no additional cost

• Provides real world training opportunities

for Military Reserve personnel otherwise

unavailable

IRT capabilities:

•

•

•

Real world training supporting America’s 

communities

Mission: To produce mission-ready forces through military training 

opportunities that provide key services for American communities.

Vision: A secure and prosperous America supported by strong

civil-military relations.

Goals:

 Restored Military Readiness

• Provide hands-on, real-world training to improve readiness and 

survivability in contingency environments.

 Strengthened Partnerships

• Strengthen and build new partnerships with culturally complex 

populations, including in remote areas.

 Innovative Resource Management

• Leverage military contributions and community resources to 

multiply value and cost savings for participants

Medical care including dentistry, optometry,

veterinary, and behavioral health

Civil Engineer, construction and public

works project

Planning and Logistical support to

communities

Cyber Security

Transportation

Learn more: http://irt.defense.gov

Innovative Readiness Training (IRT)

•

•
344 CORP., Appellant, v. KIPLING CAPITAL L.P. and Jack Bachmann, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-218

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018.

Jeff Tomberg of Jeff Tomberg, LLC, Boynton Beach, for Appellant.

Bradley W. Lang, Naples, for Appellee Kipling Capital L.P.

No appearance for Appellee Jack Bachmann.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
David I. EPPS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5118

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 23, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as duplicative of the petition filed in case 2D17-5096.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Eryc CUEVAS, DOC #T51495, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3575

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

Eryc Cuevas, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CRENSHAW, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
EX-4.10







Exhibit 4.10




Consent of Jim Ashton




     I, Jim Ashton, hereby confirm that I have read the Notice of Meeting and Management
Information Circular of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. (“Aurora”) dated March 20, 2009 (the
“Circular”) relating to the special meeting of shareholders of Aurora to approve the amalgamation
of Aurora and 59801 Newfoundland & Labrador Inc., which Circular incorporates by reference the
annual information form of Fronteer Development Group Inc. (“Fronteer”) dated March 27, 2008 for
its year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports in the AIF or other documents
incorporated by reference therein: (i) the technical report dated November 1, 2007 entitled
“Updated Technical Report, Sandman Gold Project, Humbolt County, Nevada, USA” prepared together
with Michael M. Gustin and George Lanier, and (ii) the technical report dated May 31, 2007 entitled
“Updated Technical Report, Sandman Gold Project, Humboldt County, Nevada, USA” prepared together
with Michael M. Gustin and George Lanier (collectively, the “Technical Reports”). I further consent
to the inclusion in the Circular and Fronteer’s registration statement on Form F-8 relating to the
Circular filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration
Statement”) of the Technical Reports (through the inclusion by way of incorporation by reference of
the AIF in the Circular) and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Reports in the Circular
and the Registration Statement or any documents incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Reports and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Reports contained in the Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Reports
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Reports.



	 	 	 	 	 
	March 20, 2009

	 	(signed) Jim Ashton
 

Jim Ashton, P.Eng.
2Oj 34)3

April 1, 2010

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin (3RAOO) RFrFVED

Regional Administrator APR $2010 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region III DivisiorL \SAPOO)

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Dear

I am pleased to submit the enclosed revision to the State of Delaware State

Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance ofthe National Ambient Air

Quality Standards for Ozone. The revision is entitled 7 DE Admin. Code 1141 — LIMITING

EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS FROM CONSUMER AND

COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, Section 3.0 -Portable Fuel Containers. Delaware adopted Section

3.0 in January 2001 in order to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from portable

fuel containers (i.e., gas cans). Effective January 1, 2009, the EPA began to regulate emissions from

portable fuel containers under a federal rule (37 FR 8428). The federal rule provides for better

emission control of portable fuel containers, and therefore achieves greater VOC emission reductions

than the current Delaware regulation. As such, the Department proposes that 3.0 of 7 DE Admin.Code 1141 not apply to portable fuel containers manufactured on and after January 1, 2009, and thatDelaware rely on the federal rule to control emissions from this source. A corresponding revision

was also done to the ozone SIP, demonstrating that this revision and the reliance on the federal rule

will not adversely impact Delaware’s efforts for attaining the ozone air quality standard. The

effective date of these revisions is April 11, 2010.

The requirements ofthe CAA Section 1 10(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal

public hearing process established by the State of Delaware with proper notification (30 days)prior to the convening of the public hearing. A public hearing was held on January 5, 2010.Attachments A and B are copies of affidavits as proof of proper notification. It is the position of

the State of Delaware that all minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean Air ActAmendments have been met.

Ve€a€e ‘9ood la(aze defte#td4 o#
cc: Dave old, EPA w/encl.

Au Mirzakhalili

Secretary
Jose E. GUZMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-37

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                    CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Ascential Software Corporation:

The audits referred to in our report dated March 8, 2002, included the related
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2001, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, included in the annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. This financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our
audits. In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors,
such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-01409, 33-11161, 33-22862, 333-31116, 33-31117, 333-31369, 33-31371,
33-50608, 33-50610, 33-56707, 333-61843, 333-70323, 333-89231, 333-31670, and
333-43238) on Form S-8 and (No. 333 90667) on Form S-3 of Ascential Software
Corporation of our report dated March 8, 2002, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Ascential Software Corporation and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2001, and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of
Ascential Software Corporation.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Mountain View, California
March 28, 2001
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cr-107
vs.
LEOBARDO ARAUJO COSTANOS, District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 15)

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 15), wherein the Magistrate Judge recommends that
Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Information be accepted by the Court and that
Defendant be found guilty as charged in such Count. The parties filed no objections to the Report
and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired.

The Court, having reviewed the matter de novo, determines that the Report and
Recommendation (doc. 15) of the United States Magistrate Judge should be and is hereby
ADOPTED in its entirety. The Court ACCEPTS Defendant’s guilty plea and Defendant is
hereby adjudged GUILTY of Count One of the Information.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: L1.A0-68 AGS

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
LANDRY'S SEAFOOD HOUSE-FLORIDA, INC., Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKE BAY HOLDING CO., INC., Richard Calderoni, Simon Canasi, Frank De La Grana, and St. Pete Iguana, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-1139

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

Murray B. Silverstein, and Brian R. Cummings of Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Kenneth G. Turkel, Shane B. Vogt, and Anthony Severino, of Bajo, Cuva, Cohen & Turkel, P.A., Tampa, and David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees Simon Canasi and Frank de la Grana.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, CRENSHAW, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 32-1 Filed: 11/18/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 261
Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 32-1 Filed: 11/18/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 262
Michael MAZUR, Appellant, v. Gwenaele MAZUR, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2115

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-01T15:53:25Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-01T15:53:26Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-01T15:53:26Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="13687">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-01T15:53:25Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>._ 
</p>
<p>\ </p>
<p></p>
<div class="ocr">Ne CRIN ION
EVER. Issued

DW THES
NUM ZEB

© 4213,
</div>

</div>
</body></html>