alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Jack H. Brown

Jack H. BrownChairman of the Board, President,
and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Leffel GENTRY and U. A. GENTRY *v.*Dick H. STRICKLIN et ux

5-5422

461 S. W. 2d 580

Opinion delivered January 11, 1971

*Leffel Gentry*and *U. A. Gentry,*pro se.

*House, Holmes ir Jewell;*By: *Robert L. Robinson, Jr.,*for appellees.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The sole issue on this appeal by Leffel Gentry and U. A. Gentry is whether a preponderance of the evidence supports the Chancellor’s finding that they had abandoned their right to enforce a restrictive covenant in a deed from them to George *792T. Robinson et ux, from whom the appellees Dick H. Stricklin and Daisy L. Stricklin acquired their title.

The record shows that appellants at one time owned a quarter section of land on Faulkner Lake Road. In subdividing the land into one and two acre parcels, they proceeded with the idea of restricting it to residential purposes. To carry out this purpose, they placed in each of their twenty-two deeds the following restriction:

> "LAND USE AND BUILDING TYPE. Said property shall not be used except for residential purposes. No building shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on the described tract other than one detached single-family dwelling not to exceed two and one-half stories in height, a private garage for no more than two cars, and appropriate accessory buildings, such as well house, smoke house, chicken house, etc.’’

Appellants later sold a substantial portion of the quarter section south of Faulkner Lake Road to Reed McConnell without placing any restriction in the deed.

The proof shows: that Mrs. U. A. Gentry owns a duplex on one parcel; Mr. U. A. Gentry’s home parcel is now owned by the Besancons, who use the maid’s quarters for a rent house; that the parcel originally sold to the Blands was used by them for a riding stable and now by the O’Quinns in connection with an Esso oil distributorship; that the Walker parcel is used in distributing crickets and worms; that the Hudson parcel is consistently used to park the trucks used in his business; and on the parcel sold to Billy Smith dogs are raised for sale.

The law on the subject is set forth in *Moore*v. Adams, 200 Ark. 810, 141 S. W. 2d 46 (1940), in this language:

> *793“ ‘One can not obtain relief in equity against the violation of a restrictive agreement entered into in pursuance of a general plan if he, himself, is guilty of a substantial breach of the same restriction. Nor will the violation of a restriction be enjoined where it has been disregarded by the property owner seeking the injunction as well as by other property owners generally, even though their infringements of the restriction have not been to the extent of the one against which injunction is sought.’ ”

We are unable to say that the chancellor’s conclusion under the law and the facts is contrary to a preponderance of the evidence.

Affirmed.
EX-10.13








   Exhibit 10.13



    June 5, 2008


 



    AAA Capital Management Inc.




    1300 Post Oak Blvd. #350




    Houston, Texas 77056



 



    Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato



 



    Re:  Management Agreement Renewal



 



    Dear Mr. Annunziato:



 



    We are writing with respect to your management agreement
    concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
    (the “Management Agreement”). We are extending the
    term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2009 and
    all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain
    unchanged.






 


			
	 	    •  
	SB AAA Master Fund LLC


	 	    •  
	Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P.


	 	    •  
	Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P.


	 	    •  
	Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. II


	 	    •  
	Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.


	 	    •  
	CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P.


	 	    •  
	Legion LTD AAA


	 	    •  
	Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.


	 	    •  
	Citigroup Global Futures Fund LTD.





 





 



    Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one
    copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
    Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to
    212-793-1986.
    If you have any questions I can be reached at
    212-559-5046.



 



    Very truly yours,



 



    CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC



 


		
	    By:  	
    /s/  Jennifer
    Magro









    Jennifer Magro




    Chief Financial Officer & Director



 


AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORS, LTD





		
	 
	    By:  	
    /s/  Anthony
    Annunziato








 


		
	    Print Name: 	
    Anthony Annunziato
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 61446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24147]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Fourteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 222, Inmarsat AMS(R)S

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 222, Inmarsat AMS(R)S.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
fourteenth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 222, Inmarsat AMS(R)S

DATES: The meeting will be held November 19, 2013 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036. A Webex and 
teleconference line will be provided. Please contact Hal Moses at 
hmoses@rtca.org if you are interested.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Iversen may be contacted 
directly at email: jiversen@rtca.org or by The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 
18th Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at 
(202) 330-0662/(202) 833-9339, fax (202) 833-9434, or Web site at 
http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 222. The agenda will 
include the following:

November 19

 Greetings & Attendance.
 Review summary of June 2013 meeting (13th Plenary)
 Report on the status of the DO-343 MASPS approval process
 The primary focus of the meeting will be a final review of the 
draft material for the DO-262 MOPS for SwiftBroadband, with additional 
Iridium material presented as approved by the PMC. The outcome of the 
meeting is approval of the SwiftBroadband and Iridium material for 
release to the formal RTCA Final Review and Comment (FRAC) process.
 Other items as appropriate.
 Review action items from 12th and 13th Plenary.
 Schedule 15th Plenary.
 Adjourn.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 25, 2013.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-24147 Filed 10-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Amendment to the Master Agreement for the Purchase of Activated Carbon



 Exhibit 10.58 
 SCS CONTRACT NO. SCS-28699 
 Amendment One (1) to the 
 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT 
 FOR THE PURCHASE OF CHEMICAL AND/OR GAS
PRODUCTS 
 OF THE 
 MASTER AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF CARBON 
 BETWEEN 
 RED RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS, LLC 
 SELLER 
 AND 
 SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC.

 BUYER 
 RECITALS

 WHEREAS, effective June 5, 2008 the parties entered into a contract for the purchase and sale of activated carbon
(hereinafter “Contract”), and 
 WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend such contract: 
 NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual agreements, promises and covenants herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 

Change the wording in Section 34.8 to read as follows: 
  

	34.8	Conditions to Close 

 This contract is contingent
upon the Financial Close of the debt financing for Red River Environmental Products, LLC’s first production line prior to February 28, 2009, and Supplier shall so advise Purchaser when such financing closes, identifying the lead bank. In
the event that Supplier fails to close the Financing then this Contract shall terminate and the Parties shall have no further obligation whatsoever to each other. 
 Except as amended by this Amendment Number One (1), all provisions and terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this Agreement in their respective corporate names as of the 17th day of December, 2008.

  

							
	Red River Environmental Products LLC,	    	Southern Company Services, Inc.,
	(“Supplier”)	    	(“Purchaser”)
				
	By:	 	 /s/ C. Jean Bustard
	    	By:	 	 /s/ Robert C. Self

	Name:	 	C. Jean Bustard	    	Name:	 	Robert C. Self
	Title:	 	Manager	    	Title:	 	Sourcing Manager
	Date:	 	12/17/08	    	Date:	 	12/19/2008

  

 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1043 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1043

To provide that an eligible facilities request under section 6409(a) of 
the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 is not subject 
    to requirements to prepare certain environmental or historical 
                         preservation reviews.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2021

Mr. Carter of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
    to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that an eligible facilities request under section 6409(a) of 
the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 is not subject 
    to requirements to prepare certain environmental or historical 
                         preservation reviews.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Proportional Reviews for Broadband 
Deployment Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF NEPA AND NHPA TO WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT.

    Section 6409(a)(3) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation 
Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. 1455(a)(3)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) Application of nepa; nhpa.--
                    ``(A) NEPA exemption.--An eligible facilities 
                request shall not be subject to the requirements of 
                section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy 
                Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
                    ``(B) National historic preservation act 
                exemption.--An eligible facilities request shall not be 
                considered an undertaking under section 300320 of title 
                54, United States Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50535 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FRANCISCO JESUS MARTINEZ-ALFARO, also known as Francisco Rendon Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-608-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Jesus Martinez-Alfaro concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership I-E ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 30th day of March, 2005.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP I-E
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
### ATTACHMENT D Hourly Labor Costs Used in Estimating Respondent Burden Costs Worker Category RawHourly Wage Rate a 

### Loaded Hourly Wage Rate b 

### Construction sector worker $20.36 c 

### $31.35 Construction supervisor $29.46 d 

### $45.37 Clerical worker $14.42 e 

### $ 22.21 Brake and clutch repair mechanic $18.05 f 

### $27.80 Brake and clutch repair supervisor $28.44 g 

### $43.80 Industrial hygienist $35.50 h 

### $54.67 Source: a) B LS, 2009b, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2008 National Occupational Employment and Wage E stimates May, 2009. Occupations are the same as those used in the previous ICR. b) EPA calculated the loaded hourly wage rate by inflating the raw hourly wage rate by 54 percent to account for benefits and overhead (EPA, 1992). In contrast to the wage rates, the total benefits figures for December 2008 in BLS, 2009a are for the State and local government sector. The data show that for State and local government workers the cost per hour worked figures for total compensation and wages and salary are $36.5 5 and $24.83, respectively. This would indicate that benefits represent a 37 percent increase over wages and salary. EPA has also used a figure of 17 percent to represent overhead. Combined, these result in the 54 percent figure used above. c) This is the mean hourly wa ge for the “Construction and Extraction Occupations (Major Group)” category, NAICS 47

- 0000, in BLS, 2009b. d) This is the mean hourly wage for the “First

- Line Supervisors/Managers of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers” category, NAICS 49

- 1011, in BLS, 2009b. e) This is the mean hourly wa ge for the “Secretaries, Except Legal, Medical and Executive” category, NAICS 43

- 6014, in BLS, 2009b. f) This is the mean hourly wage for the “Automotive Service Technicians and Mechanics” category, NAICS 49

- 3023, in BLS, 2009b. g) This is the mean hourly wage for the “First

- Line Supervisors/Managers of Mechanics, Installers, and Repairers” category, NAICS 49

- 1011, in BLS, 2009b. h) Because there is no industrial hygienist category in BLS, 200 9b, the mean hourly wage for the “Health and Safety Engineers, Except Mining Safety Engineers and Inspectors” category NAICS17

- 2111, in BLS, 2009b was used. This category was used based on the similarity of duties as described in the data.

### Referen ces for Attachment D

BL S 2009a, US Bureau of Labor Statistics Employer Costs for Employee Compensation Historical Listing

s . September 2009 Available at ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/spec ial.requests/ocwc/ect/ececqrtn.pdf BL S 2009b, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2008 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates May , 2009. Available at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm EPA, 1992, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation. Instructions for Preparing Information Collection Requests (ICRs) . June 1.
NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU

1636 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON DC 20301-1636

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SENIOR LEADER MANAGEMENT OFFICE, 

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU

THROUGH THE ADJUTANTS GENERAL OF STATE OR TERRITORY/

THE COMMANDING GENERAL OF THE DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA

Subject: Letter of Intent

1. I [Rank and Full Name] request inclusion in the National Guard General 

Officer Bench program for 2023 per Chief of the National Guard Bureau, 

Instruction 0800.01A, National Guard General Officer Career Management 

Bench Program.

2. I understand that by requesting inclusion on the Bench, I may be selected

to serve on short notice in a position that best represents the National Guard 

regardless of personal preference.

3. Point of contact for this memorandum is the undersigned at [phone 

number] or [email address].

Signature Block
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

CINCINNATI DEVELOPMENT III, LLC 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CINCINNATI TERRACE PLAZA, LLC, 

et al. 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 1:18-CV-586 

JUDGE MICHAEL R. BARRETT 

DEFENDANT CINCINNATI 

TERRACE ASSOCIATES LLC’S 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1), Defendant Cincinnati Terrace Associates LLC (“CTA”) 

respectfully requests an extension of time of 21 days, to February 6, 2019, in which to respond to 

Plaintiff Cincinnati Development III, LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issues 

of Breach, Specific Performance and Bona Fide Purchaser Status. (ECF #21.) For cause, CTA 

states that the extension is necessary due to the intervening holidays and Plaintiff’s overdue 

responses to CTA’s discovery requests. This request is not interposed for delay and will not 

prejudice any party. 

Wherefore, Defendant Cincinnati Terrace Associates LLC respectfully requests an 

extension of time of 21 days, until February 6, 2019, in which to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Partial Summary Judgment. 

Case: 1:18-cv-00586-MRB Doc #: 23 Filed: 01/16/19 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 764
2 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Robin D. Miller___________________ 

Robin D. Miller (0074375) 

ULMER & BERNE LLP 

600 Vine Street, Suite 2800 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

(513) 698-5054; (513) 698-5055 Fax 

rmiller@ulmer.com

and 

/s/Christine E. Watchorn 

Christine E. Watchorn (0075919) 

ULMER & BERNE LLP 

65 East State Street, Suite 1100 

Columbus, Ohio 43215 

(614) 229-0034; (614) 229-0035 Fax 

cwatchorn@ulmer.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Cincinnati Terrace Associates LLC 

Case: 1:18-cv-00586-MRB Doc #: 23 Filed: 01/16/19 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 765
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 16, 2019, a copy of the foregoing was electronically filed. 

Parties and their counsel may access this filing through the Court’s Electronic Filing System. 

/s/Christine E. Watchorn 

Christine E. Watchorn (0075919) 

282122 

Case: 1:18-cv-00586-MRB Doc #: 23 Filed: 01/16/19 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 766