alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
pennsylvaniaDEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONSECRETARYMay1,2012Mr.ShawnM.GarvinRegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,RegionIll1650ArchStreet(MailCode:3RAOO)Philadelphia,PA19103-2029DearMr.Garvin:ThisletterpertainstoarevisiontotheStateImplementationPlan(SIP)submittedbytheDepartmentofEnvironmentalProtection(DEP)onJune26,2008,concerningtheAlleghenyCountyHealthDepartment(ACHD)RulesandRegulations,ArticleXXI,AirPollutionControl,relatingtoitsPreventionofSignificantDeterioration(PSD)program.TheSIPrevision,atissue,isidentifiedasRçvision62fortheACHD’sinternaltracking.Toaddress“discretion”issuesrecentlyraisedbyyourstaff,DEPisherebymodifyingitsrequestforapprovaloftheentireACHDPSDregulationasaSIPrevisionbyredactingtheexceptionlanguageattheendofsubsection(d)ofArticleXXI§2102.07.TheSIPrevisionincorporatingArticleXXI§2102.07(d)shouldreadasfollows:d.Violation.ItshallbeaviolationofthisArticlegivingrisetotheremediesprovidedbySection2109.02ofthisArticleforanypersontocommenceconstructionofortoallowconstructiontocommenceon,ortoown,operate,orallowtobeoperated,anynewormodWedmajorsourceinanattainmentorunclassj/ledareaoftheCountyinamannerthatdoesnotcomplywithallPSDrequirementsaspromulgatedbytheEPAandincorporatedherein,exceptjfsuchpersonislanfullytemporarilyrelievedofthedutytocomplywithsuchrequirements.WelookforwardtoyourexpeditiousactiononthisSIPrevision.Shouldyouhaveanyquestionsorneedadditionalinformation,pleasecontactJoyceE.Epps,DirectorofAirQuality,bye-mailatjeeppspa.govorbytelephoneat717.787.9702.YoumayalsocontactJamesE.Thompson,Manager,ACHDAirQualityProgram,byailatjthbmpson@achd.netorbytelephoneat•412.578.7963.EnclosuresSecretaryRachelCarsonStateOfficeBuilding1P.O.Box2063IHarrisburg,PA17105-2063717.787.2814PrintedenRecycledPaperwww.depweb.pa.gov
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, David R. Odenath, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within such entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2008



/s/ David R. Odenath, Jr.David R. Odenath, Jr.Chief Executive Officer and President




20
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 5, 2010
    /s/  Christopher T. HutterChristopher T. HutterExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, 
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
E

C

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

1

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/FIG

FROM: David Hendricks, EC/R, Inc.

DATE: December 19, 2014

SUBJECT: Summary of the September 9, 2014, Meeting with the Gas Processors Association 

(GPA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to Discuss the Proposed 

Reconsideration of Additional Provisions of the Crude Oil and Natural Gas 

Production, Transmission and Distribution NSPS

I. INTRODUCTION

The GPA requested this meeting with the EPA to discuss the comments GPA submitted on the 

proposed amendments to the Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission and 

Distribution NSPS (40 CFR Part 60, subpart OOOO). This meeting summary will be available 

in the docket for this rulemaking (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505). The proposed rule 

was published in the Federal Register on July 17, 2014 (79 FR 41752). 

II. ATTENDEES

The following is a list of participants in the meeting.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

David Cozzie

Bruce Moore

Chris Frantz

Matthew Witosky

Gas Processors Association

Jeff Applekamp, GPA

Jeff Adams, BP

Laura Higgins, DCP Midstream

Mary Beth Whitfield, Williams Companies

Tom Bach, Kinder Morgan

Doug Jordan, Southwestern Energy

Grover Campbell, Devon Energy

Jim McCarthy, consultant
2

EC/R Incorporated

Veronica Hanzel (by phone)

III. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION

Bruce Moore opened the meeting by stating that the proposed rule is currently in the postproposal period and the EPA can answer clarifying questions from the group, but cannot provide 

any responses to comments on the proposed rules. 

The GPA discussed each of the comments they submitted to the EPA on the proposal and further 

clarified their position. The topics discussed include the following:

 Definition of “removed from service” under §60.5430

 Applicability status of storage vessels removed from service under §60.5365

 Sufficient time for well completions to come into compliance under §60.5395(d)(1)(i)

 Clarification of requirements for storage vessels returned to service

 Clarification of leak free requirement for enclosed combustion devices under 

§§60.5413(e)(7) and 60.5412(d)(1)(i)

 Compliance requirements for reciprocating compressors under §§60.5385(a)(3), 

60.5410(c)(1) and 60.5415(c)(4)

 Applicability of cover and closed vent requirements to reciprocating compressors under 

§60.5416(a) and (b)

 Definition of “responsible official” under §60.5430

 Consistency between the pneumatic controller affected facility definition in §60.5365(d) 

and the requirements of §60.5390

 Use of electronic spark ignition systems for combustion control devices

 Miscellaneous technical corrections

The EPA thanked the attendees for providing this information and stated that they will review 

the submitted comments to respond to these issues.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-4087

In Re: THOMAS S. PRITT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-98-176)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 2, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas S. Pritt, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* To the extent that Pritt intended this petition as a notice

of appeal from the district court's denial of his mandamus petition, his appeal is untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4.

2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas S. Pritt has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

from this Court. His petition challenges the district court’s order

denying attorney’s fees following his acquittal on multiple criminal charges. We deny the writ.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary

circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Ct, 426 U.S. 394,

402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no

other means by which the relief sought could be granted, see In re

Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a

substitute for appeal. See In re Catawba Indian Tribe, 973 F.2d

1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). Pritt could have appealed the denial

of his motion, but he failed to do so.* Accordingly, we deny

Pritt’s petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit G

Case: 2:18-cv-00190-MHW-CMV Doc #: 32-7 Filed: 12/21/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 284
CHARVAT000003

Case: 2:18-cv-00190-MHW-CMV Doc #: 32-7 Filed: 12/21/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 285
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1027 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1027

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to establish an authority to issue 
   permits to certain members of the Armed Forces who seek to carry 
          concealed firearms while on military installations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2021

  Mr. Steube (for himself, Mr. Cloud, and Mr. Mullin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to establish an authority to issue 
   permits to certain members of the Armed Forces who seek to carry 
          concealed firearms while on military installations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Bases Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITS TO CARRY CONCEALED FIREARMS ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a 
single element of the Department of Defense to issue, upon request by a 
covered member, a permit that authorizes that covered member to carry a 
concealed firearm while on any military installation.
    (b) Covered Member Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
member'' means a member of the Armed Forces who--
            (1) is not prohibited from purchasing, owning, or 
        possessing a firearm under section 922 of title 18, United 
        States Code; and
            (2) is on active duty.
                                 <all>
```
Ex parte Tracy Holt

(In re: STATE v. Tracy HOLT )

2160348

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to the Sup. Ct. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
September 27, 1996

Retirement Care Associates, Inc.
6000 Lake Forrest Drive, Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia 30308

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have read management's justification for the change in accounting for
supplies inventory (from expensing inventory when purchased to capitalizing
inventory using the cost basis) contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the
year ended June 30, 1996.  Based on our reading of the data and discussions
with Company officials of the business judgment and business planning factors
relating to the change, we believe management's justification to be
reasonable.  Accordingly, in reliance on management's determination as regards
elements of business judgment and business planning, we concur that the newly
adopted accounting principle described above is preferable in the Company's
circumstances to the method previously applied.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.                                         

Atlanta, Georgia
4-30-13 Line 1 Run 2 Temperature Data File Name: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\MDAS-PRO\Data\c1.MP_Lgr Recorder Start Time: 3/27/2013 7:21:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time Recorder Stop Time: 5/2/2013 9:21:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time Measurement Interval: 30Min Number of Measurements: 1733 Alarm Activated: False Printout Date: 5/2/2013 9:38:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time Logger Serial Number: 110405008 Initial Description: Alcoa Line 1 Final Comment: Tracking Number: 5067 Note: Data Format: Output All Measurements. DateTime Temperature

4/30/2013 16:21101.6 4/30/2013 16:51101.8 4/30/2013 17:21103.2 4/30/2013 17:51103.2 4/30/2013 18:21105.8 4/30/2013 18:51105.2 4/30/2013 19:21105.8 4/30/2013 19:51 105 4/30/2013 20:21107.4 **AVG 104.33**
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11.1


                    COMPUTATION OF PER COMMON SHARE EARNINGS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    1996                 1995                     1994    
                                                ------------          ------------            ------------
<S>                                             <C>                   <C>                     <C> 
Earnings Per Share - Primary:
-----------------------------

Weighted average of common
     shares outstanding:                         14,311,752             12,031,043              10,876,620

Common share equivalents;
     options and warrants:                           51,765                 53,262                   6,108

Common share equivalents; Excel
     Realty Partners, L.P. units:                   175,482                      -                       - 
                                                 ----------             ----------              ----------

Weighted average of common
     shares and common share
     equivalents outstanding:                    14,538,999             12,084,305              10,882,728
                                                 ==========             ==========              ==========


Net Income:                                    $ 23,796,000           $ 18,192,000            $ 13,792,000

Adjustments to net income for
     common share equivalents:                     (285,000)                     -                       - 
                                                ------------          ------------            ------------

Adjusted net income for earnings
     per share calculation:                    $ 23,511,000           $ 18,192,000            $ 13,792,000
                                               ============           ============            ============


Earnings per share                                $ 1.62                 $ 1.51                  $ 1.27
                                                    ====                   ====                    ====
</TABLE>


Note:  The fully dilutive calculation for earnings per share is not
       significantly different from the primary calculation above.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

MAURICE LEE SOLEDAD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ATTORNEY GENERAL MIKE 

DEWINE, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Case No. 1:18-cv-572

 Judge Timothy S. Black

 Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 5) AND

TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the 

Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on October 26, 2018, 

submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 5). No objections were filed.

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo 

all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in 

its entirety. 

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1) Petitioner’s case is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution.
2

2) The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 11/21/18 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 68 Filed 10/09/2003 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION

I, Ivo Heiden, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Zaxis International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2010

/s/ Ivo HeidenCEO, CFO and Chairman
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael E. Boxer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) of Mariner Health Care, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: May 12, 2003



/s/ Michael E. Boxer
----------------------------------
Michael E. Boxer
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
Terrance KEESEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5618

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### People v Daniel Pacheco,

No. 90836;

Court of Appeals No. 111816.
Valerie Sharonne OWENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4432

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and M. J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Lee, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wetherell, Makar, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.