alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Air National Guard History

• On November 1, 1915, the Guard’s first genuine 

aviation unit was established. That outfit, known today 

as the 102d Rescue Squadron, New York Air National 

Guard (ANG), is recognized as the ANG’s oldest unit.

• During World War I, the few existing Guard air units 

disbanded. Four former Guardsmen became aces and 

one Guard aviator, CPT Erwin Bleckley of Kansas,

received the Medal of Honor posthumously.

• During World War II, approximately 4,800 Guard 

aviation personnel in 29 observation squadrons 

mobilized. They served in every major operation 

theater, primarily as individuals in wartime Army Air 

Forces units. One Guard flyer, LTC Addison Baker,

received the Medal of Honor posthumously for his role 

at Ploesti. Two prewar Guardsmen became aces.

• The National Security Act established the ANG as a 

separate reserve component on September 18, 1947, 

concurrent with the creation of the U.S. Air Force.

• The ANG mobilized 45,594 Guardsmen in 67 of its 

flying squadrons, over 80 percent of its total force, 

during the Korean War. Four Air Guardsmen 

became aces.

• In 1968, 10,676 ANG personnel responded to the 

North Korean seizure of the USS Pueblo and the Tet 

offensive in Vietnam. Four fighter squadrons 

deployed to Vietnam and two went to Korea.

• The Persian Gulf crisis of 1990-1991 saw 12,404 Air

Guardsmen called into for federal service.

• Within 24 hours of the 9/11 terrorist attacks,

15 ANG units had flown 179 fighter missions and 18

ANG tanker wings had mobilized 78 aircraft to assist.

• ANG volunteers flew 4,132 airlift sorties in relief efforts 

during the devastating 2005 hurricane season.

• Personnel fought wildfires nationwide, including the 

Carr (2018, CA), Swan Lake (2019, AK), and 

Lionshead Fires (2020, OR).

• Air Guardsmen supported COVID-19 relief efforts 

beginning in March 2020, sanitizing facilities, 

supporting safe training events, and providing testing 

support nationwide.

Ploesti Raid 1943

Korea 1951

Katrina 2005

Current as of November 2020

Learn more at www.nationalguard.mil

Point of Contact: NGB Public Affairs at (703) 601-6767
##### 



Exhibit 10.3 September 24, 2004 Stephen J. Fanning
282 Las Quebradas Lane
Danville, CA 94507 Re: Amendment of Employment Agreement Dear Stephen: This letter will confirm that your employment agreement with Ocular
Sciences effective as of August 8, 2001, as amended December 1, 2001 (the
Employment Agreement), will continue in effect until the earlier of (i) the
closing of the Companys contemplated acquisition by The Cooper Companies,
Inc., pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July
28, 2004 (the Merger Agreement), (ii) the termination of the Merger
Agreement, (iii) the termination of the Employment Agreement pursuant to
Section 9 thereof or (iv) April 30, 2005. Except as otherwise provided in this letter, all other terms and
conditions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. This
letter is governed by the laws of the State of California, and contains the
entire agreement and understanding of the parties (oral or written) regarding
its subject matter. This letter may be executed in counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, and all of together will constitute one and the same
document. Please indicate your agreement to the terms of this letter by signing
below where indicated. Very truly yours,Ocular Sciences, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Steve NeilSteve Neil, Chief Financial OfficerAgreed and accepted:/s/ Stephen J. FanningStephen J. Fanning
Milton BARNETT v. Bertha GIBBS

2151015

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 98 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 3373, 

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor- 
2 

•HCON 98 EH 

1 rection: Amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to 

2 improve health care and benefits for veterans exposed to 

3 toxic substances, and for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 98 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

correction in the enrollment of the bill S. 3373. 

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make a
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Garb Oil & Power Corporation, and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Charles Laver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: 9/13/2004

By: /s/ Charles Laver
----------------------------
Charles Laver
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 

1636 DEFENSE PENTAGON 

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1636 

OCT O 8 2020 

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY 

As Chief of the National Guard Bureau, I am committed to providing a 

work environment that exemplifies dignity, respect, and inclusion. To ensure a

fair and equitable work environment for all of our employees, we embrace the 

principles of EEO, diversity, and inclusion as we recruit, develop, and retain a 

high-performing workforce that truly reflects the face of our Nation as a whole.

We must ensure that no applicant for employment or employee of the

National Guard Bureau is denied equal opportunity because of race, color, 

religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy, status as a parent,

national origin, age, disability (physical or mental), family medical history or

genetic information, political affiliation, military service, or other non-merit

based factors. These protections extend to all management practices and

decisions, including recruitment and hiring practices, appraisal systems,

promotions, training, and career development programs.

We must work diligently to maintain a workplace free from harassment 

and discrimination. Employees and applicants for employment have the right

to report incidents of harassment or discrimination without fear of retaliation.

Retaliation against those who initiate discrimination complaints, serve as 

witnesses, or participate in protected communication, is strictly prohibited.

Leaders, managers, and supervisors are responsible for creating an 

inclusive work environment and will promptly respond to any allegation of 

harassment before it becomes severe or pervasive. Any employee or applicant 

for employment who believes he or she has been subject to or has knowledge of

discriminatory or harassing behavior is to initiate an EEO complaint within 45

days of the alleged discriminatory event by contacting a supervisor, servicing

Human Resources Office, or the Equity and Inclusion Office.

We must ensure that, at every level, the National Guard sets the best

example for its impartiality and inclusiveness in the workplace. Each of us 

must take responsibility for implementing the National Guard Bureau's EEO

policy and cooperating fully in its enforcement. In doing so, we reaffirm our 

agency's commitment to our organization's greatest strength and most valuable

resource: Our people. Always Ready, Always There!

��eral, __A�okanson 

U.S. Army 

Chief, National Guard Bureau
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1009 

To require all Federal agencies to translate COVID–19 materials into multiple 

languages, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2021 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Ms. BLUNT

ROCHESTER, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. CASE, Mr. LIEU, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. GOMEZ, Ms. PORTER, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. KILMER, 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. PRESSLEY, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. 

SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. ESHOO, Mrs. HAYES, Mr. PRICE of 

North Carolina, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. MCNERNEY, Ms. STRICKLAND, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. SIRES, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. 

CARSON, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. NEWMAN, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. BRENDAN

F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. TORRES of New York, Ms. JOHNSON of 

Texas, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Mr. EVANS, and Mr. MEEKS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To require all Federal agencies to translate COVID–19 

materials into multiple languages, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Language 

5 Access Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1009 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSLATION OF MATERIALS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Each Federal agency that receives 

3 Federal assistance related to the COVID–19 pandemic 

4 shall translate any English language written material pre5 pared for the general public relating to such pandemic, 

6 including COVID–19 vaccine distribution and education, 

7 into the languages described in subsection (b) not later 

8 than 7 days after any such material is made available in 

9 English. 

10 (b) LANGUAGES COVERED.—The material described 

11 in subsection (a) shall be translated, at a minimum, into 

12 Spanish, Arabic, Cambodian, Chinese, Haitian Creole, 

13 French, Hindi, Hmong, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Lao14 tian, Russian, Tagalog, Urdu, Vietnamese, Greek, Polish, 

15 Thai, and Portuguese. 

16 (c) DEFINITION OF COVID–19 PANDEMIC.—In this 

17 section, the term ‘‘COVID–19 pandemic’’ means the pub18 lic health emergency declared by the Secretary pursuant 

19 to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act on Janu20 ary 31, 2020, entitled ‘‘Determination that a Public 

21 Health Emergency Exists Nationwide as the Result of the 

22 2019 Novel Coronavirus’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 67 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 67

  Expressing the sense of Congress that passengers in motor vehicles 
should be educated and encouraged to advocate for their own safety and 
the safety of others during National Passenger Safety Week, January 23 
               through 29, 2022, and throughout the year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2022

  Mr. Cleaver (for himself and Mr. Graves of Missouri) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that passengers in motor vehicles 
should be educated and encouraged to advocate for their own safety and 
the safety of others during National Passenger Safety Week, January 23 
               through 29, 2022, and throughout the year.

Whereas everyone has an important role to play in increasing road safety;
Whereas passenger deaths accounted for 25 percent of all traffic deaths 
        nationwide in 2019;
Whereas traffic deaths increased 7 percent in 2020 and 18 percent in 2021 
        according to the preliminary estimates of the National Highway Traffic 
        Safety Administration (NHTSA);
Whereas passenger vehicle occupant deaths rose 5 percent in 2020;
Whereas these historic increases in traffic deaths occurred as there was a 13 
        percent decrease in vehicle miles traveled;
Whereas NHTSA's data show the main behaviors leading to this increase were 
        speeding, impaired driving, and failure to wear seat belts;
Whereas, whether a driver is impaired by alcohol or drugs, speeding, driving too 
        aggressively, driving distracted, or unable to stay awake at the wheel, 
        bad driving choices put passengers at risk of serious injury or death;
Whereas many lives might have been saved had a passenger in the car insisted 
        that the driver slow down, stop texting, or not get behind the wheel in 
        the first place;
Whereas passengers, especially teens and young adults, need education and 
        encouragement to empower them to save lives by calling out unsafe 
        driving in the car as it happens; and
Whereas parents also need education and encouragement to teach their children 
        about the importance of speaking up or not getting in the car with 
        someone who is drunk, under the influence of drugs, or distracted: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that passengers in motor vehicles 
should be educated and encouraged to advocate for their own safety and 
the safety of others during National Passenger Safety Week and 
throughout the year.
                                 <all>
```
Jorge Luis DE DIEGO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Janai BARRIOS, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1973

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 20, 2017

Following review of the petition for writ of prohibition, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

LAGOA, SCALES and LUCK, JJ., concur.
P. 1 

# RCRA Box 321 Prepped byRyan Dugan



### Document

Number: 

# 210)OGRC-S001 1 Docket Number: 

# F-93-OGRC-FFFF F

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:31 PM

Sheet 210of 259P. 2 

### OC-RC-SOOl/

P . O. Drawe r139 5 Snyder , Texa s 7954 9 Phon e (915)573-638 5 Septembe r 19 , 199 0

Mr . Rober t Hal l 40 0 MStree t Washington , D.C . 2046 0 Re : T.C.L.P . Rul e Dea r Sir : Midwester nReclamatio nwa s establishe di n197 5 andha s operate d continuousl ysinc e tha t time . Ou r proces s i s limite dt o leas e crud e tha t doe s no t mee t minimum pipelin e specifications . Thi s off-spe c i s receive da t ou r plant , th e wate r andsolid s ar e removed , and th e oi l i s markete dt o a pipelin e a s virgi ncrud e oil . I t i s ou r positio ntha t sinc e ou r proces s doe s no t chang e th e molecula r structur e o f th e incomin g crud e oil , th e wast e remove d i s identica l t o leas e crud e and therefor e shoul dno t b e classifie d a s hazardou s waste . We fee l tha t w e perfor m a conservatio nservic e b yrecoverin g crud e oi l tha t woul dotherwis e b e lost . Th e oi l companie s wil l d o what
eve r i s mos t economica l andtherefor e wil l no t us e reclamatio nplant s i f the yca ndispos e o f thi s off-spe c crud e oi l les s expensively . I nsummary , sinc e w e d o no t chang e th e molecula r compositio no f th e crud e oi l w e receive , andwe trea t onl yleas e crud e andd o no t recycl e use dmoto r oil , w e fee l tha t reclaimer s suc ha s ourselve s shoul db e classifie da s crud e oi l producers . Respectfully , Bil l Kirmfe l BK/s m cc : Da nEisenhaue r
Marcial RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 6, 2018

Marcial Rodriguez, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Deborah S. Hunt 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

 Filed: March 13, 2019 

Mr. Mark G. Kafantaris 

Law Offices 

625 City Park Avenue 

Columbus, OH 43206 

Ms. Sarah E. Pierce 

Office of the Attorney General 

30 E. Broad Street 

16th Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

 Re: Case No. 19-3196, William Schmitt, et al v. Frank LaRose

Originating Case No. : 2:18-cv-00966 

Dear Counsel: 

 This case has been docketed as case number 19-3196. It will be held in abeyance until after 

the district court rules on pending motions, identified under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4), and 

jurisdiction transfers to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Once this court has jurisdiction, the 

appeal will proceed in the normal course and you will receive additional instructions from the 

Clerk's office. 

 In the meantime, you are strongly encouraged to read the Federal Rules of Appellate 

Procedure and Sixth Circuit Rules at www.ca6.uscourts.gov. If you are counsel for a party and 

have not established a PACER account and registered with this court as an ECF filer, you should 

do so immediately. Your password for district court filings will not work in the appellate ECF 

system. If you are representing yourself in this appeal, you will continue to file in paper and 

your pleadings will be scanned into the court's electronic docket. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 

 

s/Amy E. Gigliotti 

Case Management Specialist 

Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012 

cc: Mr. Richard W. Nagel 

Enclosure 

Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 44 Filed: 03/14/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 326 
OFFICIAL COURT OF APPEALS CAPTION FOR 19-3196

 

 

WILLIAM T. SCHMITT; CHAD THOMPSON; DEBBIE BLEWITT 

 Plaintiffs - Appellees 

v. 

FRANK LAROSE, Ohio Secretary of State 

 Defendant - Appellant 

Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 44 Filed: 03/14/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 327
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.32


                    FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT ("Amendment") is made this    day of February, 1999 between
Golf One Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation") and James
A. Capwill ("Consultant").

     WHEREAS, on or about November 5, 1998 the Corporation and Consultant
entered into a certain Consulting Agreement (the Original Consulting Agreement)
whereby Consultant was hired to perform certain consulting services for the
Corporation; and

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Original Consulting Agreement, as
provided herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Corporation and Consultant agree as follows:

     1.  Consulting Services.  In addition to the services provided in the
Original Consulting Agreement, Consultant agrees (i) to provide the Corporation
with at least one personal appearance of at least one half day in length per
calendar quarter, on dates to be mutually arranged at a location mutually
approved; (ii) to make at least one (1) member of Consultant's staff available
at least one (1) hour per week, on mutually arranged dates, for telephone
consultation regarding the Corporation's general financial matters; (iii) to
introduce the Corporation's president from time to time to persons who
Consultant reasonably believes may have an interest in transacting business
with the Corporation; and (iv) to review such financial documents regarding any
material acquisitions or mergers as the Corporation's president may reasonably
request from time to time and provide verbal comment to the Corporation's
president regarding such review.

     2.  Term.  The Original Consulting Agreement, as amended, is hereby
extended through December 31, 1999. At the option of Consultant, the Original
Consulting Agreement, as amended, may be extended by two months for each month
or part thereof beyond December, 1999 that the Corporation is indebted to
Capital Fund Leasing, LLC, or the successor or assigns thereof.

     3.  Consideration.  In addition to the consideration provided under the
Original Consulting Agreement, the Corporation agrees to pay Consultant the sum
of $82,500.00, payable (i) $15,000.00 upon the execution of this Amendment,
(ii) $7,500.00 per month starting on the first day of April, 1999 and
thereafter on the first day of each month through December, 1999, and (iii)
$7,750.00 per month for each month that the Original Consulting Agreement, as
amended, is extended pursuant to Section 2 of this Amendment.

     4.  Ratification.  The Original Consulting Agreement, as amended by this
Amendment, is hereby ratified and affirmed in full and incorporated herein by
reference.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed as of the day and
year first above written.


Golf One Industries, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation

By: Alfonso J. Cervantes
   ---------------------------          ---------------------------
                                        James A. Capwill
Its: President
     -------------------------
R.T., the Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3253

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 9, 2018]

R.T., Fort Pierce, pro se.

Kelley Schaeffer, Bradenton, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.

Laura J. Lee, Sanford, for Appellee Guardian Ad Litem Program.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, May and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Cameo Paige SPENDLOVE v. Terry Dean SPENDLOVE

2160126

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
V.E., the Mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-1879

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
BM23+,M;,MD2'MD3;97MF @&MF@(!FM M"8M$;883DD)&MD;M=@<H4%5:*M

(?F"7M(8>7;K8(9DM;>>;@DF93EMM"9&M(?F"7MD@("D8(9DM/@M"77M (M8FCDM

(9CF@(MD2"DM9;M">>73$"9DM/@M(8>7;K8(9DM;@M(8>7;K((M;,MD2(M"D3;9"7MF"@&M3CM

&(93(&M(?G"7M;>>;@DF93EM#($"FC(M;,M@"$(M $;7;@M @(7313;9M C(JM1(9&(@M3&(9D3EM

C(JF"7M;@3(9D"D3;9M>@(19"9$KMCD"DFCM"CM"M>"@(9DM 9"D3;9"7M;@3139M"1(M

&3C"#373DKM>2KC3$"7M;@M8(9D"7M -837KM8(&3$"7M23CD;@KM;@M1(9(D3$M39/@8"D3;9M

>;73D3$"7M".73"D3;9M8373D"@KMC(@H3$(M ;@M;D2(@M9;98(@3D#"C(&M-$D;@CM 2(C(M

>@;D($D3;9CM(JD(9&MD;M"77M8"9"1(8(9DM>@"$D3$(CM"9&M&($3C3;9CM39$7F&391M

@($@F3D8(9DM"9&M23@391M>@"$D3$(CM ">>@"3C"7MCKCD(8CM >@;8;D3;9CM D@"39391M"9&M

$"@((@M&(H(7;>8(9DM>@;1@"8C	M

(M8FCDMI;@6M&3731(9D7KMD;M8"39D"39M"MI;@6>7"$(M0((M0;8M&3C$@383L

9"D3;9
M 8>7;K((CM"9&M">>73$"9DCM/@M(8>7;K8(9DM2"H(MD2(M@312DMD;M@(>;@DM

39$3&(9DCM;,M&3C$@3839"D3;9M;@M2"@"CC8(9DMI3D2;FDM,("@M;,M@(D"73"D3;9M (>@3C"7M

/@M(91"1(8(9DM39M>@;D($D(&MM"$D3H3DKMI377M9;DM#(MD;7(@"D(&M

("&(@CM8"9"1(@CM"9&MCF>(@H3C;@CM"@(M@(C>;9C3#7(M/@M$@("D391M"9M

39$7FC3H(MI;@6M(9H3@;98(9DM"9&MI377M>@;8>D7KM@(C>;9&MD;M"9M"77(1"D3;9M;,M

2"@"CC8(9DM#(/@(M3DM#($;8(CMC(H(@(M;@M>(@H"C3H(M

2(M"D3;9"7MF"@&MI377M$;9D39F(MD;M>@;H3&(M@("C;9"#7(M"$$;88;&"D3;9CM

D;M(8>7;K((CM"9&M">>73$"9DCMI3D2M&3C"#373D3(CM "CMI(77M"CM/@M@(7313;FCM

;#C(AH"9$(CM"9&M>@"$D3$(C	M

DM3CM39$F8#(9DMF>;9M("$2M;,MFCM "DM(H(@KM7(H(7M D;M(9CF@(MD2"DMD2(M

"D3;9"7MF"@&MC(DCMD2(M#(CDM(J"8>7(M/@M3DCM38>"@D3"73EM"9&M39$7FC3H(9(CCM39M

D2(MI;@6>7"$(
M 36(I3C(M ("$2M;,MFCM8FCDMD"6(M@(C>;9C3#373EM/@M38>7(8(9D391M

D2(M"D3;9"7MF"@&CMM>;73$KM"9&M$;;>(@"D391M,F77KM39M3DCM(9/@$(8(9D	M 9M

&;391MC;M I(M@(".@8M;F@M"1(9$KCM$;883D8(9DMD;M"MI;@6>7"$(M0((M;,MF97"I,F7M

&3C$@3839"D3;9M2"@"CC8(9DM"9&M@(D"73"D3;9M

(9(@"7MM M3@M;@$(M

23(,M "D3M 9"7MF"@&MF@("FM