alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 105 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make residents of Puerto 

Rico eligible for the earned income tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N (for herself and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

residents of Puerto Rico eligible for the earned income 

tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Earned Income Tax 

5 Credit Equity for Puerto Rico Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUERTO RICO RESIDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR EARNED 

7 INCOME TAX CREDIT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 32 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following new subsection: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 105 IH

1 ‘‘(n) RESIDENTS OF PUERTO RICO.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of residents of 

3 Puerto Rico— 

4 ‘‘(A) the United States shall be treated as 

5 including Puerto Rico for purposes of sub6 sections (c)(1)(A)(ii)(I) and (c)(3)(C), 

7 ‘‘(B) subsection (c)(1)(D) shall not apply 

8 to nonresident alien individuals who are resi9 dents of Puerto Rico, and 

10 ‘‘(C) adjusted gross income and gross in11 come shall be computed without regard to sec12 tion 933 for purposes of subsections (a)(2)(B) 

13 and (c)(2)(A)(i). 

14 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—The credit allowed under 

15 this section by reason of this subsection for any tax16 able year shall not exceed the amount, determined 

17 under regulations or other guidance promulgated by 

18 the Secretary, that a similarly situated taxpayer 

19 would receive if residing in a State.’’. 

20 (b) CHILD TAX CREDIT NOT REDUCED.—Subclause 

21 (II) of section 24(d)(1)(B)(ii) of such Code is amended 

22 by inserting before the period ‘‘(determined without re23 gard to section 32(n) in the case of residents of Puerto 

24 Rico)’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 105 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made shall 

2 apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 nos. 33-15777, 33-33966, 33-61286, 33-90490, 333-01885, 333-07519, 333-69597, 333-69599, 333-92879, 333-51892, 333-51894 and 333-106601) pertaining to various stock plans of Manatron, Inc. of our report dated June 27, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Manatron, Inc. and subsidiary as of April 30, 2003 and April 30, 2002 and for the years then ended included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the years ended April 30, 2003 and April 30, 2002.

| | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| | ---------------------

Grand Rapids, Michigan
July 21, 2003

---
Exhibit 10.2

December 4, 2008

Steve Filton

Senior Vice
President & CFO

UHS of Delaware, Inc.

367 South
Gulph Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

Dear Steve;

The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust, at their December 4, 2008 meeting, authorized the renewal of the current Advisory
Agreement between the Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (Agreement) upon the same terms and conditions.

This letter constitutes
the Trusts offer to renew the Agreement, until December 31, 2009, upon the same terms and conditions. Please acknowledge UHS of Delawares acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this
letter to me. Thank you.



|                           |  |                              
|-------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Sincerely,                
|                          
|/s/ Cheryl K. Ramagano    
|Cheryl K. Ramagano        
|Vice President & Treasurer
|                          
|Agreed and Accepted:      
|                          
|UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.     
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Steve Filton             
|                           |  | Steve Filton                 
|                           |  | Senior Vice President and CFO
|                          
|cc:        Charles Boyle
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 71 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 71

 Honoring the memory of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 
                Stoneman Douglas High School 1 year ago.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2019

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the memory of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 
                Stoneman Douglas High School 1 year ago.

Whereas, on February 14, 2018, a mass shooting that took the lives of 17 
        teachers and students took place at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School 
        in Parkland, Florida;
Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for those who were 
        affected by this tragedy;
Whereas President Donald Trump stated: ``No child, no teacher, should ever be in 
        danger in an American school. No parent should ever have to fear for 
        their sons and daughters when they kiss them goodbye in the morning.'';
Whereas the Parkland community has shown strength, compassion, and unity in the 
        past year; and
Whereas February 14, 2019, marks 1 year since the horrific attack: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates the victims killed in the attack and 
        offers heartfelt condolences and deepest sympathies to the 
        families, loved ones, and friends of the victims;
            (2) honors the survivors and pledges continued support for 
        their recovery;
            (3) recognizes the strength and resilience of the Marjory 
        Stoneman Douglas High School community; and
            (4) expresses gratitude to the emergency medical and health 
        care professionals of the Parkland community for their efforts 
        in responding to the attack and caring for the victims and 
        survivors.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          33,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (190)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,174
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,158
<PP&E>                                          35,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,934)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        214
<COMMON>                                         2,346
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,314
<SALES>                                         10,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,337
<CGS>                                            8,083
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
Walter JUAREZ-LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4136

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### John Earl ALEXANDER *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 74-39

509 S.W. 2d 816

Opinion delivered June 3, 1974

*Harold L. Hall,*Public Defender, by: *Lloyd R. Haynes,*Dep. Public Defender, for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Alston Jennings Jr.,*Dep. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of armed robbery and received a sentence of 21 years with ten years suspended. Thereafter, he sought postconviction relief from that sentence pursuant to our Criminal Procedure Rule 1. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing and denied appellant’s petition. On appeal the only contention for reversal by present counsel is that the trial court erred in denying postconviction relief by finding that appellant had effective assistance of trial counsel. We agree with the trial court.

Appellant was charged as a habitual criminal. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-2328 (Supp. 1973). He admitted that he had served four previous prison sentences; his court appointed trial counsel advised him that it was possible for him to receive 31 *Vz*years if the jury found him guilty of robbery as well as the alleged previous convictions inasmuch as the previous convictions would enhance the maximum (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-3602 [Repl. 1964]) 21 year robbery sentence to that extent; his attorney conferred with him on several occasions; his *701attorney discussed the defense as well as the prosecution evidence; and his counsel advised him he had the right to a jury trial or the option to plead guilty and it was for him, the petitioner, to make the decision. In fact, appellant testified that primarily he was seeking a reduction or modification of his sentence.

Appellant’s court appointed trial counsel, who has practiced criminal law for several years, testified that the state’s evidence was made available and he had fully discussed that evidence as well as appellant’s in advising him; he made arrangements for the appellant to discuss his defense with his co-defendant and others; appellant admitted he was present at the scene of the alleged robbery although disclaiming any intent to participate in the offense; appellant was advised, as he admitted, that pursuant to the Habitual Criminal Act appellant could possibly receive 31 *Vi*years in prison; appellant asked him to negotiate a plea with the prosecution and seek a ten year sentence; appellant decided to take the 21 year sentence with ten years suspended as offered by the state; further, he told appellant that the ultimate decision as to his plea was strictly left to appellant and was made by him only.

We are firmly of the view, after a full review of the record before us, that appellant was ably represented by his court appointed counsel and, therefore, there was no violation of appellant’s constitutional rights. *Franklin and Reid*v. *State,*251 Ark. 223, 471 S.W. 2d 760 (1971); *Leasure*v. *State,*254 Ark. 961, 497 S.W. 2d 1 (1973); and *Credit*v. *State,*247 Ark. 424, 445 S.W. 2d 718 (1969).

Affirmed.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 15, 2011 | /s/ Randolph L. Marten  |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                            | Randolph L. Marten      |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer |
|                            |                    |
|                            |                    |
|                            | /s/ James J. Hinnendael |
|                            | James J. Hinnendael     |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 35 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 35

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the 
 Comptroller of the Currency relating to ``National Banks and Federal 
                   Savings Associations as Lenders''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2021

Mr. Garcia of Illinois submitted the following joint resolution; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the 
 Comptroller of the Currency relating to ``National Banks and Federal 
                   Savings Associations as Lenders''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 
relating to ``National Banks and Federal Savings Associations as 
Lenders'' (85 Fed. Reg. 68742; published October 3, 2020), and such 
rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Jeffrey Blevins, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

Capital Alliance Group, 

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:18-cv-364

Chief Judge Sargus

Magistrate Judge Jolson

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Jeffrey Blevins

hereby dismisses this action without prejudice.

 Respectfully submitted,

Date: August 15, 2018 /s/ Matthew R. Wilson

 Matthew R. Wilson (0072925)

 Email: mwilson@meyerwilson.com

 Michael J. Boyle, Jr. (0091162)

 Email: mboyle@meyerwilson.com

 MEYER WILSON CO., LPA

 1320 Dublin Road, Ste. 100

 Columbus, OH 43215

 Telephone: (614) 224-6000

 Facsimile: (614) 819-8230

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case: 2:18-cv-00364-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/15/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 215
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing was filed via the Court’s ECF system and 

served on all parties appearing.

By: /s/ Matthew R. Wilson 

 Matthew R. Wilson

One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case: 2:18-cv-00364-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/15/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 216
** **

**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Marten Transport, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedcertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best knowledge of the undersigned:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 14, 2005 | /s/ Randolph L. Marten                                            |   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Randolph L.  Marten                                               |
|                       | President and  Chief Executive Officer                            |
|                       |                                                              |
|                       | /s/ Darrell D. Rubel                                              |   |
|                       | Darrell D. Rubel                                                  |
|                       | Executive Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer |

 

----
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 5 

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD 

CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 

FEB 2 8 2012. 

Ms. Amber A. Westerbur 

Program Manager 

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 

1568 Highway 2 

Two Harbors, Minnesota 55616 

Re: Request for 15 Day Extension 

Dear Ms. Westerbur: 

REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF 

WN-161 

In accordance with 15 C.F.R. § 930.41(b), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approves 

your request for a 15 day extension to submit your consistency determination. EPA has 

documented that our request letter was received by your agency on December 27, 2011. As 

such, we now expect to receive your determination by March 11, 2012, and if necessary, 

conditions, based on specific enforceable policies, that would permit the Minnesota Department 

of Natural Resources to concur with EPA's consistency determination. Please provide a current 

copy of the enforceable policies for your state with your response. If the Minnesota Department 

of Natural Resources fails to furnish a reply within this time period, EPA will presume your 

concurrence. 

If you have any question, please contact Sean Ramach of my staff, at 312-886-5284 or 

rarnach.sean@ep a. gov. 

Tinka G. Hyde 

~ Director, Water Division 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed w1th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (50% Postconsumer)
December
23, 2009





Gotham
Enterprises & Affiliates, LLC


c/o
Herbert Feinberg


17 East
74th
Street


New York,
NY 10021





Dear Mr.
Feinberg,





Per our
Lease Agreement dated February 5, 2007 concerning the property located at
Carratera a Santa Rita, Calle Tomas Urbina #1, Jerez de Garcia Salinas,
Zacatecas, Mexico, according to the terms and conditions of Article 39, “Lessee
shall have the option to extend the Lease Term for an additional three years”.
“To be effective, Lessee must give Lessor written notice of Lessee’s election to
extend the lease term not less than Ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of
the Lease Term”.





Please
accept this letter as confirmation of our election to extend the lease term for
an additional three years commencing on April 1, 2010 and ending on March 31,
2013.





We would
also like to discuss the possibility of another three year extension and/or a
purchase of the building before the new lease is signed.





Should
you have any questions please feel free to contact me.





Very
truly yours,





/s/
Christopher J. Ryan





Christopher
J. Ryan
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882342
<NAME> 90CC
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          78,398
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,094
<PP&E>                                       5,773,448
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,918,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 995,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     972,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   995,248
<SALES>                                        198,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,059
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,075)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,075)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Kenneth Robert BOEHM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Marie STEPHENSON, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0184

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 23, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The parties' stipulation for dismissal filed February 20, 2018, is treated as a notice of voluntary dismissal and is granted. This appeal is dismissed.