alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1807
ROBERT EMERSON LAMB, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security; MICHAEL CUMMINGS, Manager, Social Security Administration; ROSANA FIGUEROA, Case Worker, Social Security Administration, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport N ews. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:07-cv-00020-RBS) Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 25, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Emerson Lamb, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Emerson Lamb appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lamb v. Astrue , No. 4:07-cv-00020-RBS (E.D. Va. August 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           15250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   181516
<ALLOWANCES>                                    113000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                713520
<PP&E>                                          157353
<DEPRECIATION>                                   56933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2864345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2415729
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13701
<OTHER-SE>                                      434915
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2864345
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                689663
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2176585
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                113000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1621830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    100000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1521830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   18637
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1503193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1053 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1053

    To provide that a project to remove and replace communications 
       equipment or services listed under the Secure and Trusted 
 Communications Networks Act of 2019 is not subject to requirements to 
   prepare certain environmental or historical preservation reviews.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2021

 Mr. Guthrie introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide that a project to remove and replace communications 
       equipment or services listed under the Secure and Trusted 
 Communications Networks Act of 2019 is not subject to requirements to 
   prepare certain environmental or historical preservation reviews.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Timely Replacement Under Secure and 
Trusted for Early and Dependable Broadband Networks Act'' or the 
``TRUSTED Broadband Networks Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF NEPA AND NHPA TO COVERED COMMUNICATIONS 
              EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES.

    (a) NEPA Exemption.--A covered project shall not be subject to the 
requirements of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy 
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
    (b) National Historic Preservation Act Exemption.--A covered 
project shall not be considered an undertaking under section 300320 of 
title 54, United States Code.
    (c) Covered Project Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
project'' means a project to permanently remove covered communications 
equipment or services (as defined in section 9 of the Secure and 
Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1608)) and to 
replace such covered communications equipment or services with 
communications equipment or services that are not covered 
communications equipment or services (as so defined).
                                 <all>
```
What is ARNG 4.0?

Army National Guard 4.0 is an evolutionary response to an uncertain, changing operational environment. 

It increases readiness, over time, through organizational and cultural changes within the Army National 

Guard. Because readiness is the Army’s top priority, ARNG 4.0 is designed to strengthen the 

contribution of the ARNG within the Army Total Force. 

Why is ARNG 4.0 important? 

ARNG 4.0 prepares the Army National Guard to quickly and effectively meet the security challenges of 

the 21st century. It maximizes limited resources, prioritizes capabilities and enhances readiness within 

the Army Total Force. ARNG 4.0 simultaneously increases the Army National Guard’s capabilities for 

homeland security and natural disaster response, as well as for Combatant Commander requirements.

What are some of the ARNG 4.0 impacts? 

 Decreased mobilization timelines

 Increased opportunity for professional development 

 Balanced force structure and increased manning in high-priority units

 Top-notch training through challenging collective training exercises to prepare our Soldiers to fight, 

win and return home safely

 Increased individual and collective training

Why do we need ARNG 4.0?

America’s security environment is complex, chaotic and uncertain. As the largest reserve force in the 

Department of Defense, the Army National Guard must be prepared to fight and win our Nation’s wars 

whenever called upon. In some cases, “one weekend a month” no longer meets the need. ARNG 4.0 

changes the organizational culture and creates a new framework for the individual Guardsman.

What does ARNG 4.0 mean? 

Some priority Army National Guard units will increase their training schedules beyond the traditional one 

weekend per month and two weeks during the summer. Specific units will increase unit strength and 

conduct additional Combat Training Center rotations. 

Who will be affected by ARNG 4.0? 

Units with specialized, high-demand capabilities will need more training time to build the combat 

readiness required of them. Because Family members, civilian employers and communities will all be 

affected by their Soldiers’ absence, a renewed commitment is necessary from this support base in order 

for the ARNG to be successful meeting the Nation’s security needs.

TOTAL READINESS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

ARNG 4.0
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

KAMARIA DOBOSU, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-273

 

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent Case)

Defendant.

ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD 

OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”)

(DOC. 17); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $3,000.00 IN EAJA FEES

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint 

stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal 

Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $3,000.00. Doc. 17. Based 

upon the parties’ stipulation in which they present no dispute that all requirements are met for the 

reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties’ joint stipulation (doc. 17); 

and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $3,000.00. As no further matters remain 

pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: March 8, 2019 s/ Michael J. Newman 

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,464
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  499,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,984
<INVENTORY>                                     30,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               592,687
<PP&E>                                         731,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                 229,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,780,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          317,797
<BONDS>                                      1,278,488
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           414
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,780,216
<SALES>                                        908,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               908,767
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  926,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (64,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (13,951)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (50,934)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (11,275)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.40)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.40)
<FN>
<F1>EPS-Primary reflects EPS-Basic
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40956

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS HUMBERTO LOPEZ-SANCHEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CV-74

USDC No. 5:05-CR-2307-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Humberto Lopez-Sanchez

(Lopez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40956

2

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           2235
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                   50030
<ALLOWANCES>                     2762
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                60179
<PP&E>                          25394
<DEPRECIATION>                  15749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  81957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           46838
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                           50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                      17679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    81957
<SALES>                         43560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                43560
<CGS>                           37446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   37446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 3296
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  2275
<INCOME-TAX>                      853
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              1422
<DISCONTINUED>                  (1399)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                       23
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .01

        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1996 (unaudited) and 
the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended 
September 30, 1996 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference 
to such financial statements.  
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                      <C>                  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                    SEP-30-1996 
<CASH>                                                                1,933
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         3,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            653
<INVENTORY>                                                           3,826
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      9,543
<PP&E>                                                                1,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       23,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 2,554
<BONDS>                                                                 100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                 61
<OTHER-SE>                                                           21,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         23,738
<SALES>                                                              10,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     10,202
<CGS>                                                                 5,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         5,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         577
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            698
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    (121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           (121)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          (.02)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                              EXHIBIT 10.4
                               FIRST AMENDMENT
                                   TO THE
                     AMENDED AND RESTATED BRIDGE AGREEMENT


      THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BRIDGE AGREEMENT (the  
"Amendment") dated as of September 1, 1996, is between SPS TRANSACTION 
SERVICES, INC. ("Borrower") and DEAN WITTER, DISCOVER & CO. ("DWDC").

      WHEREAS, Borrower and DWDC are parties to an Amended and Restated Bridge 
Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1995, pursuant to which DWDC has agreed to 
make certain loans to the Borrower; and

      WHEREAS, the Borrower and DWDC desire to amend the Amended and Restated 
Bridge Agreement.

      NOW THEREFORE, the Amended and Restated Bridge Agreement is amended as 
follows:

           1.  Each capitalized term used in this Amendment (and not otherwise 
      defined herein) shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Amended 
      and Restated Bridge Agreement.

           2.  Section 1 of the Amended and Restated Bridge Agreement is 
      hereby amended in its entirety and henceforth shall read as follows:

               1.  Amount:  The maximum aggregate amount that DWDC shall be   
           required to lend hereunder at any time shall be $750,000,000;  
           provided, however, that DWDC may, from time to time and upon 
           written notice to Borrower, reduce such maximum commitment by an 
           amount not to exceed the total amount of credit card receivables 
           that are sold by Hurley State Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of 
           Borrower, pursuant to any securitization agreement entered into 
           after the date of this Amended and Restated Bridge Agreement; 
           provided, that, except as provided in Section 5(a), any such 
           reduction shall not affect the status of any loans then outstanding 
           hereunder.

           3.  Section 2 of the Amended and Restated Bridge Agreement is 
      hereby amended in its entirety and henceforth shall read as follows:

               2.  Term:  This Amended and Restated Bridge Agreement shall 
           expire on January 31, 1997.

           4.  Except as provided herein, the terms and conditions of the 
      Amended and Restated Bridge Agreement shall remain in full force and 
      effect.


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly 
executed as of the date first written above.

SPS TRANSACTION SERVICES, INC.           DEAN WITTER, DISCOVER & CO.

By:/s/ Thomas M. Goldstein               By:/s/ Birendra Kumar              

Title: Vice President - Finance          Title: Treasurer
IV 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 7 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol to honor the last surviving 

Medal of Honor recipient of the Second World War upon death. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2021 

Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia (for herself, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. 

BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. STEUBE, 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington, Mr. BACON, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. MASSIE, 

Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Mr. BUDD, Mr. BURCHETT, Mr. FITZPATRICK, 

Mrs. GREENE of Georgia, and Mr. CICILLINE) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol to honor 

the last surviving Medal of Honor recipient of the Second 

World War upon death. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. HONORING LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF HONOR 

4 RECIPIENT OF SECOND WORLD WAR. 

5 (a) USE OF ROTUNDA.—At the election of the indi6 vidual (or next of kin of the individual), the last individual 

7 to die who was awarded the Medal of Honor for acts perVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:23 Jan 22, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC7.IH HC7

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 7 IH 

1 formed during World War II shall be permitted to lie in 

2 honor in the rotunda of the Capitol upon death. 

3 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Architect of the Capitol, 

4 under the direction and supervision of the President pro 

5 tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of 

6 Representatives, shall take the necessary steps to imple7 ment subsection (a) upon the death of the individual de8 scribed in such subsection. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS