alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10(c)

     

    FORM
OF

    FIRST
AMENDMENT TO

    EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT

    


    WHEREAS, Provident
Community Bank (the “Bank”), Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. (the “holding
company”) and ___________________ (the “Executive”) previously entered into an
employment agreement, originally effective as of January 1, 2003 (the
“Agreement”); and

    


    WHEREAS, the parties
desire to amend the Agreement to reflect the holding company’s name change from
Union Financial Bancshares, Inc. to Provident Community Bancshares, Inc.;
and

    


    WHEREAS,
Section 21 of the Agreement provides for its amendment by means of a
written instrument signed by the parties.

    


    NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as
follows:

    


    First
Change

    


    All
references to the Company in the Agreement shall refer to Provident Community
Bancshares, Inc.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank and
the Company have caused this Amendment to the Agreement to be executed by their
duly authorized officers, and the Executive has signed this Amendment, on the
___ day of __________________, 2007.

     

    
      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    
                      
                        
                          	
                                  ATTEST:

                                	 
      	
                                  PROVIDENT
      COMMUNITY BANK

                                
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                                  By: 

                                	 
	 
      	 
      	 
      	
                                  For
      the Board of Directors

                                
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                                  ATTEST:

                                	
                                   

                                	
                                  PROVIDENT
      COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.

                                
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                                  By: 

                                	 
	 
      	 
      	 
      	
                                  For
      the Board of Directors

                                
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                                  WITNESS:

                                	 
      	
                                  EXECUTIVE
<PAGE>



                               Mr. Robert S. Trump
                              2611 West 2nd Street
                            Brooklyn, New York 11223


                                          November 12, 1996

Financial Performance Corporation
335 Madison Avenue, 11th Floor
New York, New York 10017

Attention:  Mr. William F. Finley
             President

            Re: Financial Performance Corporation (the "Company")

Dear Bill:

Please be advised that I have elected to exchange $125,000.00 of the principal
amount of the Restated Exchangeable Note dated as of January 1, 1995 (the
"Note') into 400,000 post-reverse split shares of the Company's common stock
pursuant to the terms of the Note, at the effective post-reverse split exchange
price of $0.3125 per share.

Further, this letter shall confirm that I have agreed with the Company to
convert the current remaining principal balance and accrued interest thereon
through the date hereof in respect of the Note after effectuating the
aforementioned exchange ($47,154) together with the current principal balance
and accrued interest thereon through the date hereof in respect of all other
indebtedness of the Company held by me ($117,460) into an aggregate of 164,614
additional post-reverse split shares of the Company's common stock at the
conversion rate of $1.00 per share.

With regard to such conversion, as well as the prior conversions of other
indebtedness of the Company held by me in March 1996 and June 1996, it is
understood and agreed that if, at any future date(s), the Company shall issue
post-reverse split shares of common stock to any other party for a price of less
than $1.00 per share, I shall thereupon be issued such number of additional
shares of the Company's common stock without payment of any additional
consideration so that the effective conversion rate for all shares of the
Company's common stock issued to me resulting from the conversion of debt to
equity is equal to the lowest per-share price at which the Company's
post-reverse split common stock is hereafter issued to any other party.

This letter shall also confirm that the Company has granted me "piggy-back"
registration rights converting all shares of the Company's common stock which I
currently own, whether issued to me by the Company (either directly, by exercise
of warrants, by exchange of the Note or by conversion of the debt) or acquired
by me from any third party(ies).

Thank you for your kind attention to these matters.

Confirmed and Agreed To:                  Sincerely,

Financial Performance Corporation


By: /s/ William F. Finley              /s/ Robert S. Trump
   ------------------------------      -------------------
   William F. Finley, President          Robert S. Trump
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

SERGHEI VERLAN,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:18-cr-109-2

JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE

CALENDAR ORDER

This matter shall proceed as follows:

Pretrial Motions,

including Motions In Limine August 19, 2022

Proposed Jury Instructions & Verdict Forms1 August 24, 2022

Responses to Pretrial Motions September 2, 2022

Objections to Proposed Jury Instructions &

Verdict Forms September 7, 2022

Trial Briefs (if any) September 8, 2022

Proposed Witness Lists & Exhibit Lists2 September 9, 2022

Replies to Pretrial Motions September 12, 2022

Exhibit Binders3 September 19, 2022

1 Proposed jury instructions and verdict forms must be filed on the docket and also emailed 

in Word format to Chambers at Cole_Chambers@ohsd.uscourts.gov. 

2 Proposed witness and exhibit lists must be emailed, in Word format, to Chambers at 

Cole_Chambers@ohsd.uscourts.gov, and may be submitted ex parte. To the extent 

possible, please list witnesses in the anticipated order of presentation. 

3 The Court requires: (1) the original set of all exhibits (witness’ exhibit binder); (2) one 

complete hard-copy set of all exhibits (Judge Cole’s courtesy exhibit binder); and (3) one set 

of all exhibits in electronic format, saved to a USB flash drive or sent in a zip file via email 

to Cole_Chambers@ohsd.uscourts.gov (law clerk’s exhibit binder). The original and Judge’s 

copy of the exhibits must be pre-marked and organized sequentially in tabbed, three-ring 

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 225 Filed: 03/10/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1411
2 

Final Pretrial Conference September 19, 2022, at 1:00 p.m.

Courtroom 822

Jury Trial October 11, 2022, at 9:30 a.m.

Courtroom to be determined

The Defendant requested a continuance of this case through the trial date set 

forth above. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the requested 

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial, 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(i), as failure to grant the continuance 

would deprive the Defendant of the opportunity to file motions and prepare for trial, 

and thus likely would result in a miscarriage of justice. 

Based on the foregoing, the Court finds the period of time elapsing from March 

10, 2021, until October 11, 2022, is properly, and shall be, excluded from the speedy 

trial calculation. 

SO ORDERED. 

March 10, 2022

DATE DOUGLAS R. COLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

binders. All three sets must be delivered to Chambers in Room 810. Counsel will not be 

permitted to add or change any exhibits after the deadline, unless counsel provides the Court 

with the new or amended exhibits, in all three formats, and amended exhibit lists, before the 

Court reconvenes.

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 225 Filed: 03/10/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1412
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ERICK DAVID LOPEZ, AKA Spooky,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10326

D.C. No. 3:08-cr-00342-SI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Erick David Lopez appeals from his conviction and 360-day sentence for

being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

FILED

SEP 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10326

§ 922(g)(5)(A), and for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Lopez seeks to challenge the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress

evidence of a firearm discovered during a traffic stop. The government contends

that Lopez’s appeal is moot because he stipulated that he possessed a firearm

which in turn formed the basis of his conviction. Giving Lopez the benefit of the

doubt that his appeal is not moot, see United States v. Larson, 302 F.3d 1016,

1020-22 (9th Cir. 2002) (discussing when an appeal may be moot following a

stipulation), we conclude that the district court did not err in denying Lopez’s

motion to suppress, see United States v. Wallace, 213 F.3d 1216, 1220 (9th Cir.

2000).

AFFIRMED.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1095 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 101 South Willowbrook Avenue in Compton, 

California, as the ‘‘PFC James Anderson, Jr., Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1095 EH

1 SECTION 1. PFC JAMES ANDERSON, JR., POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 101 South Willowbrook Avenue 

5 in Compton, California, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘PFC James Anderson, Jr., Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘PFC James Anderson, 

11 Jr., Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1095 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostAnderson, Jr., Post Office Building’’. nue in Compton, California, as the ‘‘PFC James al Service located at 101 South Willowbrook Ave-
Oscar DOPICO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2135

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1066 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1066

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
  Assistance Act to provide flexibility with the cost share for fire 
             management assistance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wildfire Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE COST SHARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of assistance under this 
section shall be not less than 75 percent of the eligible cost of such 
assistance.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall only 
apply to amounts appropriated on or after the date of enactment of this 
Act.

SEC. 3. RULEMAKING.

    Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
President, acting through the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, shall conduct and complete a rulemaking to provide 
criteria for the circumstances under which the Administrator may 
recommend the President increase the Federal cost share for section 420 
of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 
(42 U.S.C. 5187). Such criteria shall include a threshold metric that 
assesses the financial impact to a State or local government from 
responding to a fire for which fire management assistance is being 
provided.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1066

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
  Assistance Act to provide flexibility with the cost share for fire 
             management assistance, and for other purposes.
```
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

8/13/19

 Southern District of Ohio

Dawn Roden

3:18-CV-239

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant; case is remanded under the fourth sentence of 42

U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings

✔ Michael J. Newman

Decision and Entry
#### Gui CHEN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-73818.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 16, 2004.

Decided May 28, 2004.

Arthur J. Liu, Downing & Liu, LLP, Attorney at Law, Oakland, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Margaretta Eakin, Esq., Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Esq., Russell J.E. Verby, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: NOONAN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and SELNA,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable James V. Selna, District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Gui Chen (“Chen”), a native and citizen of China, appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) November 5, 2002 Order upholding the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision to deny Chen’s ap*805plication for asylum, 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a) (Supp. II 1996) (recodified at 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)), and withholding of removal under Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) Section 241(b)(8)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(A), and Article Three of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment of Punishment, opened for signature Feb. 4, 1985, S. Treaty Doc. No. 100-20, at 20 (1988), 23 I.L.M. 1027, 1028 (1984) (“Convention Against Torture”).

We conclude that the IJ’s adverse credibility finding was based on sufficiently “specific, cogent” reasons, and is thus supported by substantial evidence. *Osorio v. INS,*99 F.3d 928, 931 (9th Cir.1996). Because Chen’s testimony was not credible, he failed to meet the standard of proof to qualify for asylum. It necessarily follows that he failed to meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding under the INA. *Ghaly v. INS,*58 F.3d 1425, 1429 (9th Cir.1995).

We further hold that the IJ’s denial of Chen’s claim for withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture was supported by substantial evidence. Chen presented no evidence, credible or otherwise, that his mistreatment rose to the level of torture. *See 8*C.F.R. § 208.18(a)(1).

The petition for review is accordingly DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1. Such quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: November 15, 2004

By:         /s/ James A. Joyce
            James A. Joyce
            Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

HEARTLAND HEALTH & WELLNESS 

FUND, A SELF-FUNDED ERISA 

MULTIEMPLOYER FUND, BY HENRY B. 

TAYLOR, AND JOE CHORPENNING, IN 

THEIR CAPACITY AS TRUSTEES,

 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

JANET L. BILLETER, et al.,

 Defendants.

 Case No. 2:17-CV-00214

CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. 

SARGUS, JR.

 Magistrate Judge Jolson 

 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Replace Documents with 

Redacted Versions. (Doc. 30). The Motion explains that Defendant Janet Billeter was injured 

on September 9, 2015, when, as a pedestrian, she was hit by a passing tractor/trailer. The 

underlying tort litigation settled, but was subject to a confidentiality agreement restricting 

disclosure of the settlement terms or amount. In this case, Plaintiff, Janet Billeter’s health care 

plan, seeks to enforce a lien against the proceeds of the settlement. The parties state that, “[i]n 

the course of briefing, certain inadvertent references have been made to different aspects of the 

settlement, including the overall settlement amount, the dates and amounts of certain payments 

made to Mrs. Billeter thereunder, and Mrs. Billeter’s social security number.” (Id. at 2). Thus,

the parties move this Court to substitute documents in the current record with redacted versions 

of those documents. 

Upon review, the undersigned finds that the Motion properly demonstrates a compelling 

reason for filing under seal and is narrowly tailored to serve that reason. See Blasi v. United 

Debt Servs., LLC, No. 2:14-CV-83, 2016 WL 3765539, at *1 (S.D. Ohio July 14, 2016) (noting 
2

that a proper motion to seal must “demonstrate[] a compelling reason for filing under seal, . . . 

must be narrowly tailored to serve that reason,” and must “analyze in detail, document by 

document, the propriety of secrecy, providing reasons and legal citations”). Accordingly, for 

good cause shown, the Joint Motion to Replace Documents with Redacted Versions is 

GRANTED. (Doc. 30). Consequently, the Clerk is DIRECTED to replace the documents as 

set forth in the Joint Motion and related attachments.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: March 16, 2018 /s/ Kimberly A. Jolson

KIMBERLY A. JOLSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 105 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 105

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
   present the statue of Harry S. Truman from the people of Missouri.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2022

Mr. Cleaver (for himself, Mr. Graves of Missouri, and Mr. Luetkemeyer) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
   present the statue of Harry S. Truman from the people of Missouri.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY FOR PRESENTATION OF STATUE OF 
              HARRY S. TRUMAN FROM THE PEOPLE OF MISSOURI.

    The State of Missouri is authorized to use the rotunda of the 
Capitol on September 29, 2022, for a ceremony to present the statue of 
Harry S. Truman from the people of Missouri for placement in the 
rotunda of the Capitol. Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
99.1

CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SAN Holdings,
Inc.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SAN Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SAN Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Date: April 15, 2003 | /s/ John Jenkins
     John Jenkins, President and
     Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: April 15, 2003 | /s/ Hugh A. OReilly
     Hugh A. OReilly
     Senior Vice President and
     Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Luis M. GUTIERREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1067

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.