alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                                            5

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,749,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,612,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,137,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,749,321
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (2,606,639)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,606,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,606,639
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,606,639
<EPS-BASIC>                                      31.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    31.07


</TABLE>
Bobby L. MAGWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4644

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Jesus SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-30277.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

James Peters, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Samuel Richard Rubin, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, ROZINSRI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Jesus Sanchez-Sanchez appeals his sentence of 46 months imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry of an alien deported subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Sanchez-Sanchez contends that the district court improperly concluded that it did not have discretion to grant a downward departure based on the fact that his predicate felony offense was outside the “heart*766land” of cases subject to a sixteen-level enhancement under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A), and that his criminal history was over-represented. We disagree. Our review of the record indicates that the district court was aware of its authority to depart downward, but concluded that a departure was not warranted given Sanchez-Sanchez’s criminal history and behavior. Because the district court recognized its authority to depart downward, but declined to do so, we cannot review the district court’s decision. *See United States v. Romero,*293 F.3d 1120, 1126-27 (9th Cir.2002), *cert. denied,*537 U.S. 1144, 123 S.Ct. 948, 154 L.Ed.2d 844 (2003).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**I, Phillip J. Smith, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 10, 2006   /s/ Phillip J. Smith Phillip J. Smith  Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)
Mark E. PANUNZIO and Stacy Wein, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-1761

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   211
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,748
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,522
<OTHER-SE>                                    (38,969)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       301
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          26,573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  370,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                    68,967
<INVENTORY>                                     34,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               420,132
<PP&E>                                         670,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                 356,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,041,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,327
<BONDS>                                        573,772
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                     312,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,041,705
<SALES>                                        913,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               913,954
<CGS>                                          337,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  337,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               101,141
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,539)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,911
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,450)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)
        

</TABLE>
1011/2015 Matrice 100-FiightTest- DJI Wiki 

# Matrice 100-Flight Test
FromDJIWiki Takeoff

### I Landing Procedures 1. Place the aircraft on an open, flat ground withthe battery indicator facing you. 2. Power onthe remote controller andyourmobile device, and then the Intelligent Flight Battery. 3. Launch the DJI Pilot app and enter Camera View. 4. Wait until the Aircraft Status Indicator flashes green. This means the Home Point is recorded and it is safe to fly. Ifit flashes yellow, the Home Pointhas not been recorded andyou shouldnottake off. 

### 5. Push the throttle stickup slowly to take offoruse Auto Takeoff. 6. To land, hover over a level surface and gentlypull down onthe throttle stickto descend slowly. 7. After landing, execute the CSC command orpush the throttle stick down for 3 seconds until the motors come to a stop. 8. Turn offthe Intelligent Flight Battery, followed by the remote controller. Note:
• When the Aircraft Status Indicator flashes yellow rapidly during flight, the aircraft has entered the Failsafe mode.
• The Aircraft Status Indicator will flash red slowly for a Low Battery Level warning, and flash red rapidly for a Critically LowBattery Level warning during flight. Retrieved from "http:/ /wiki.dji.com/enlindex.php?title=Matrice _100-Flight_ Test&oldid=23283"

• This page was last modified on 21 July 2015, at 05:23. • This page has been accessed 196 times.

http://wiki.dji.oom/en/inclex.phptMatrice_100-Fiight_Test 1/1
Exhibit 99

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Oncologix Tech, Inc.
Grand Rapids, Michigan

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration
Statement  as filed on May 29,  2001,  relating  to the  consolidated  financial
statements  and  schedules of Oncologix  Tech,  Inc.  appearing in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009.

We also  consent  to the  reference  to us under the  caption  "Experts"  in the
aforementioned Registration Statement.





/s/  CHISHOLM, BIERWOLF, NILSON & MORRILL, LLC
----------------------------------------------
     CHISHOLM, BIERWOLF, NILSON & MORRILL, LLC


Bountiful, Utah

October 28, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


               I, C. Steven Guenthner, Chief Financial Officer of Almost Family,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual
               period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
               the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
               of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company





Date:          November 14, 2005                  By  /s/ C. Steven Guenthner
               -----------------                         -----------------------
                                                         C. Steven Guenthner
                                                         Senior Vice President &
                                                         Chief Financial
                                                         Officer



    A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
               Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on
                                    request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UROLOGIX FDS
FOR 1ST QUARTER FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,814,708
<SECURITIES>                                20,719,903
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,278,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,340,709
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,786,330
<PP&E>                                       2,954,137
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,025,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,121,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,535,970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,408
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,460,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,121,648
<SALES>                                      2,599,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,599,135
<CGS>                                        1,738,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,738,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,207,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,347,102
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,015,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,015,660)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,015,660)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00416-CR

IN RE HUBERT WARREN

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed December 6, 2012

Do not publish

[OT06]
Clevon GHENT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1241

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 17, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for belated appeal is denied.

LaROSE, C.J. and SILBERMAN and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  H ANSEN B EVERAGE C OMPANY , a Delaware corporation, dba Monster Beverage Company,

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 06-56390 v. D.C. No. N ATIONAL B EVERAGE C ORP ., a 

#  CV-06-05470-ER Delaware corporation; S HASTA B EVERAGE I NC ., a Delaware ORDER corporation; N EWBEVCO I NC ., a Delaware corp.; F REEK ’ N B EVERAGE C ORP ., a Delaware corporation,

Defendants-Appellants. 

# 

Filed August 17, 2007

Before: William C. Canby, Jr. and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges, and Suzanne B. Conlon,* District Judge.

ORDER

The motion of Hansen Beverage Company to file its Motion to Vacate Opinion under seal is GRANTED, and its motion and reply to the opposition are ordered sealed.

On June 29, 2007, we filed our opinion in the appeal by National Beverage Company of a preliminary injunction. See Hansen Beverage Co. v. National Beverage Co. , slip op. 7699, 2007 WL 1859607 (9th Cir. 2007). Our mandate has

*The Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

10393not yet issued. It has now been made known to us that, on June 8, 2007, the parties had executed a settlement agreement that, among other things, stipulated that the preliminaryinjunction that was the subject of the appeal was made permanent. As a consequence, there was no longer a controversy between the parties over the preliminary injunction at the time we issued our opinion, and the case was moot.

We lacked jurisdiction to decide a moot case. See In re Pattullo , 271 F.3d 898, 900 (9th Cir. 2001). We accordingly VACATE our opinion and decision of June 29, 2007, and DISMISS this appeal. See id. at 902. 10394 H ANSEN B EVERAGE v. N ATIONAL B EVERAGEPRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.
## SERVE D FEBRUAR Y 23 , 201 2 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N j>^^i3P0^^^^ ^

OFFIC EO FHEARING S ' f](\\< p Qp'rR-\T\C}H^ . WASHINGTON , D C " '-••- ' '- ' 

## m FE B 

## ? 3 P 2

^ 3 0 I N TH EMATTE ROF. COVERMAR K

US A •A A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-20M-048 8 NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designate da s Cas e No . 2010SO7003I8 ) ha s been assigne dto Administrativ e La

w Judg e J.E . SulMvan . All futur e pleading s andothe r

communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve don th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an

dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-20M-048 8 (Civi l Penall y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Keit hRoberts , Respondent' s Counse l President , Robert s Proprietaries , Inc . 18 0 Wes t 80t hSt . Ne w York , N Y 1002 4 TEL : 917-441-864 2 FAX : Geral dA . Ellis , Comp/ainanl' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , ASO- 7 Souther n Regio n l-edera l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , G A 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e J.E . Sullivan , Adininistraliv e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y e.\pedite dcourier, use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviation Administration , 60 0 Independence Avenue , S.W. . Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .

- 2 -