alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORIGINS: The DSC was first implemented for the Group of Eight (G-8) Economic 

Summit in June 2004. Brig. Gen. Terry Nesbitt (Georgia NG) commanded more than 4,800 

Soldiers and Airmen, 317 NG personnel from other states, 43 members of the Georgia 

State Defense Force and approximately 2,400 Title 10 personnel, including ARNG and 

ANG units mobilized under T10.

FACT SHEET

DUAL STATUS COMMANDER (DSC)

NATIONAL GUARD

OVERVIEW

In the event of a multistate disaster or national event requiring a DSC, separate DSCs would be appointed to 

command in each of the affected states due to state law prohibitions (where appropriate/where required). 

Consistent with current laws and procedures, the governor of a state does not use the DSC to request Department of 

Defense forces or equipment.

SIMULTANEOUS SERVICE

The president and the governor of the state must both agree to the establishment of a DSC. 

DSC appointment can be terminated by the secretary of defense or the governor at any time. The National Defense 

Authorization Act (NDAA), signed in December 2011, facilitated the use of DSCs to provide unity of effort between 

state and federal forces in achieving common objectives in a disaster response or in supporting a national event.

STATE STATUS

FEDERAL STATUS

A DSC is a member of the state’s chain of command, subject to the orders of the governor and adjutant general of 

the DSC’s state, and exercises command of assigned state NG forces.

The governors of 53 states/territories have established standing memoranda of agreement with the secretary of 

defense for the DSC appointment status command.

Title 32, United States Code, Section 325, authorizes a National Guard officer to be placed on active component 

without losing their Guard component status.

The DSC is a member of the federal chain of command, subject to the orders of the president, the secretary of 

defense, and the supported combatant commander. They are subject to the orders of the commander of U.S. 

Northern Command when in the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, the District of Columbia and the territories of Puerto 

Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. DSCs are subject to the commander of U.S. Pacific Command when in Hawaii and 

the territory of Guam. In addition, DSCs exercise command of assigned federal military forces.

An active-duty (T10) Army or Air Force officer is authorized to accept a commission in the NG of a state without 

losing his/her active component status (32 U.S.C., section 315). 

A DSC is an officer of the Army National Guard (ARNG), Air National Guard (ANG), commissioned officer of 

the Regular Army or Regular Air Force who has completed specialized training and certification. DSCs are 

jointly managed by the commander of U.S. Northern Command and the chief of the National Guard Bureau 

and may, by law, serve in two statuses (federal and state) simultaneously.

MULTIPLE STATE EVENT
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1203 

To limit the United States from rejoining the Joint Comprehensive Plan 

of Action. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2021 

Mrs. MCCLAIN (for herself, Ms. HERRELL, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. CRAWFORD, 

Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. CARL) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To limit the United States from rejoining the Joint 

Comprehensive Plan of Action. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Iran Nuclear 

5 Verification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES FROM REJOINING 

7 THE JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF AC8 TION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi10 sion of law, the United States may not become a party 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1203 IH

1 to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or to any other 

2 agreement with Iran relating to the nuclear program of 

3 Iran until the President certifies to Congress that nuclear 

4 inspectors of the United Nations— 

5 (1) are allowed full access to all of Iran’s nu6 clear facilities; and 

7 (2) have completed their comprehensive report 

8 relating to Iran’s nuclear facilities. 

9 (b) JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ACTION DE10 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘Joint Comprehensive 

11 Plan of Action’’ means the Joint Comprehensive Plan of 

12 Action signed at Vienna on July 14, 2015, by Iran and 

13 by France, Germany, the Russian Federation, the People’s 

14 Republic of China, the United Kingdom, and the United 

15 States, and all implementing materials and agreements re16 lated to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11210-11211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4704]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday March 11, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

[[Page 11211]]

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-4704 Filed 2-25-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### Smock *v.*Corpier.

5-1022

292 S. W. 2d 260

Opinion delivered July 2, 1956.

*Charles A. Wade,*for appellant.

*Wood*& *Smith,*for appellee.

*702George Rose Smith, J.

This is a suit by the ap-pellee, who is the appellant’s tenant, for specific performance of an option to purchase the land covered by the written lease. The defense is that the option was available to the tenant only during the first two years of the original five-year term and cannot be exercised during the five-year renewal term that is now in force. The chancellor, finding the lease to be ambiguous, allowed the appellee to introduce parol evidence to explain the document. Upon the basis of that proof the court held that the option to purchase could be exercised during the renewal term.

We are unable to determine from the appellant’s abstract of the record, which the appellee has not supplemented, whether the chancellor’s decree is erroneous. Parol evidence is frequently admissible to explain the meaning of a written instrument. The appellant asserts that this lease is free from ambiguity, but she has not quoted its language or even summarized it adequately. She also asserts that the oral proof was inadmissible, but she declines to abstract any of the testimony. It is manifestly impossible for us to sustain her contention without having either the lease or the testimony before us.

In reply to the appellee’s criticism of the abstract the appellant insists that it is unnecessary to abstract the testimony in a chancery case, for the reason that this court tries the case *de novo.*The appellant is mistaken in her understanding of our practice. The case is tried *de novo,*it is true, but the trial is upon the evidence as abstracted by the parties and not upon the original record. We have repeatedly required compliance with Rule 9 in equity cases. *Davis*v. *Spann,*92 Ark. 213, 122 S. W. 495; *Norden*v. *DeVore,*207 Ark. 1105, 184 S. W. 2d 585; *Reep*v. *Reep,*219 Ark. 270, 241 S. W. 2d 262.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 22, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ec3cfcee3fee2fda0e8fceca0e1fce9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f8b5b9b89588948bd69e8a9ad6978a9f">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Ascent BanCorp, Helena, Montana; Alan W. Bradley, Charles 
Shonkwiler, Christine A. N. Bradley, Kelcy Edwards, and certain minor 
children, all of Hamilton, Montana; Patrick Haffner, Frenchtown, 
Montana; Minott Pruyn, Daniel Schneiter, Haley Bradley, and a certain 
minor child, all of Missoula, Montana; and Daniel Wilcox, Corvallis, 
Montana; a group acting in concert with Bitterroot Holding Company, 
Lolo, Montana, to acquire voting shares of Antler Land Company, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Little Horn State Bank, 
both of Hardin, Montana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 1, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-02345 Filed 2-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Duan E. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2887

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED 3/31/98.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         672,195
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  214,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,995,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,956,121
<PP&E>                                          59,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,022,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,492,036
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,903,341
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,524,723)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,022,871
<SALES>                                      2,305,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,305,209
<CGS>                                        2,638,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,638,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,933,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             171,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,433,554)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,433,554)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,433,554)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        

</TABLE>
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 75 

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2022, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2022 

Ms. DELAURO submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Appropriations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2022, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2022 (division 

4 A of Public Law 117–43) is further amended— 

5 (1) by striking the date specified in section 

6 106(3) and inserting ‘‘March 15, 2022’’; and 

7 (2) in section 163, by striking ‘‘$300,000,000’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘$500,000,000’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 75 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY ORDER FOR 

2 FENTANYL-RELATED SUBSTANCES. 

3 Effective as if included in the enactment of the Tem4 porary Reauthorization and Study of the Emergency 

5 Scheduling of Fentanyl Analogues Act (Public Law 116– 

6 114), section 2 of such Act (as amended by Public Law 

7 117–86) is amended by striking ‘‘March 11, 2022’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘March 15, 2022’’. 

9 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Extension 

10 of Continuing Appropriations Act, 2022’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Richard Lammel ARNOLD, Jr. v. STATE

CR-15-0735

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        752,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,618,467
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               865,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                752,052
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            752,052
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   752,052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Euriell LAIDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2372

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 20, 2018

Euriell Laidler, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The appellant challenges the denial of his postconviction motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which argued that his attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to suppress the victims' out-of-court and in-court identifications. The trial court summarily denied the motion, concluding that the appellant had not shown a deficient performance by counsel or any resulting prejudice. However, the court did not attach to the order records that conclusively refute the appellant's claim. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(4) ("A copy of the portion of the files and records in the case that conclusively shows that the defendant is not entitled to relief as to one or more claims shall be attached to the order summarily denying these claims.").

In response to this Court's order, the state concedes that the trial court's order is insufficient to support the summary denial of the appellant's motion due to the court's failure to attach documents. We, therefore, reverse and remand for the attachment of records that conclusively refute the appellant's claim or for an evidentiary hearing. *See**Ortiz v. State* , 968 So.2d 681, 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Roberts, Rowe, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Yvon AUGUSTIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3552

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 2, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal of the denial of petitioner's postconviction motion after evidentiary hearing, order dated July 28, 2017, is granted in circuit court case number CF-05-006892-XX. This order shall serve as a notice of appeal for purposes of calculating the time standards of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The attorney who filed the petition for belated appeal will be recognized as counsel of record for the appellant when the new proceeding is initiated in this court.

The circuit court clerk shall treat this order as a notice of appeal, promptly certify same and return it to this court as with any notice of appeal, accompanied by any order of indigency that may have been entered by the circuit court, and a new appellate case number will be assigned to this appeal and an acknowledgment letter will issue at that time.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Vanessa STEVENSON, Appellant, v. RESIDENCY APPEALS COMMITTEE OF FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2191

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 12, 2018]

Jason P. Dollard of Leslie Robert Evans & Associates, PA, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Daniel A. Jones of Office of the General Counsel Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, May and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Ivan CLARK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-535

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (109)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,823
<PP&E>                                          30,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,942)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        214
<COMMON>                                         1,984
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,336
<SALES>                                          8,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,786
<CGS>                                            7,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,127)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        

</TABLE>