alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>








EXHIBIT 27 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (FDS)




<ARTICLE>                     5




<MULTIPLIER>                                          1000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                              7,572
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     217,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  278,743
<PP&E>                                            528,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    926,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             237,930    
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        440,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      926,290
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,358,714
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,265,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (532)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  6,243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    87,311
<INCOME-TAX>                                       36,034
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                51,277
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       51,277
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.94




        

</TABLE>
Eduardo VAZQUEZ, DOC #T61892, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2320

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Fw: Two clarifying questions

Charlotte Withey to: Francisco Donez 09/15/2012 12:45 PM

Cc:

"Colleen McKaughan", "Steve Frey", "Eugene Chen", "Thomas 

Webb"

Francisco -- please add the exchange between Debbie and Kelly to the docket. Thanks! 

----- Forwarded by Charlotte Withey/R9/USEPA/US on 09/15/2012 12:41 PM -----

From: Deborah Jordan/R9/USEPA/US

To: Colleen McKaughan, "Steve Frey" <Frey.Steve@epamail.epa.gov>, "Eugene Chen" 

<Chen.Eugene@epamail.epa.gov>, "Thomas Webb" <Webb.Thomas@epamail.epa.gov>, 

Cc: "Charlotte Withey" <Withey.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov>

Date: 09/14/2012 05:07 PM

Subject: Fw: Two clarifying questions

Deborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

U.S. EPA Region 9

(415) 972-3133

 From: Barr Kelly J [Kelly.Barr@srpnet.com]

 Sent: 09/14/2012 11:31 PM GMT

 To: Deborah Jordan

 Cc: Montalvo Kara M <Kara.Montalvo@srpnet.com>; "Pratt James M (Jim)" <Jim.Pratt@srpnet.com>

 Subject: RE: Two clarifying questions

Hi Debbie,

Here are the answers to your two questions:

1. Is the SCR designed to operate on the clean side or the upstream side of the hot-side ESP?

Answer: The SCR currently being installed on CGS Unit 2 will be located downstream of the existing 

hot-side ESPs.

2. Did Sargent and Lundy use the heat-input-weighted compliance method in calculating the 

projected 30-day NOx emissions under the varying load conditions? It would be helpful if you 

could submit the formula that Sargent and Lundy used for the 30-day NOx calculations.

Answer: Sargent and Lundy did use the heat-input-weighted compliance method for their 

analysis. The specific formula used by S&L can be found in the CGS Title V operating permit, 

which is consistent with the method required by the consent decree.

Hope this is helpful. Please let us know if you have any additional questions or need any additional 

information.
Have a great weekend,

Kelly

From: Deborah Jordan [mailto:Jordan.Deborah@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:18 AM

To: Barr Kelly J

Cc: Montalvo Kara M

Subject: Two clarifying questions

Hi Kelly,

My technical staff asked me to pass along a couple of clarifying questions about the information you 

provided on Coronado Unit 2. The information you already gave us is extremely helpful. Could you ask 

your people to send us responses to these two questions? An email response would be fine.

1. Is the SCR designed to operate on the clean side or the upstream side of the hot-side ESP?

2. Did Sargent and Lundy use the heat-input-weighted compliance method in calculating the projected

30-day NOx emissions under the varying load conditions? It would be helpful if you could submit the 

formula that Sargent and Lundy used for the 30-day NOx calculations.

I'm passing these along via email just to try to expedite things. Our people would certainly be available to 

talk, if you need any additional clarification on what they're trying to understand. I'm on travel this week 

but will of course be checking my messages regularly.

I hope all is well.

-- Debbie

_________________

Deborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

U.S. EPA Region 9

phone: (415) 972-3133
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, C. Christian Winkle, President and Chief Executive Officer of Mariner Health
Care, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: May 7, 2004 /s/  C. Christian WinkleC. Christian WinklePresident andChief Executive Officer (PrincipalExecutive Officer)
S.C., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3843

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
file:///P|/

... %20Versions/Monroe/Follow%20Up%20Questions%20about%20Monroes%20FGD%20Wastewater%20Treatment%20System.txt [1/21/2010 9:17:58 AM] From: Kurtis Blohm To: brownjl@dteenegy.com Date: 12/1/2009 4:37 PM Subject: Follow Up Questions about Monroe's FGD Wastewater Treatment System Jason, Thank you very much for your time on the phone today. I have two follow up questions for you: 1. What is the typical flow rate and the duration of the flow through the wastewater treatment system? We discussed that the flow is, on average, about 90 gpm for any 24 hour period, but it would help to know the typical flow when the treatment system is operating. 2. What pollutant concentration levels is the system achieving? That is, what are typical effluent concentrations for the pollutants you provided on the phone? For question 2, it may be easier for us to discuss this over the phone, since I suspect this information may be confidential. In that case, do not hesitate to call me during normal business hours (8 AM - 5 PM). Regards, Kurt Kurt Blohm Chemical Engineer Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Pkwy, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 (703) 633-1675
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aethlon Medical, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. Based on my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and

         2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: August 14, 2009

By: /s/ James A. Joyce
    -----------------------
    James A. Joyce
    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
David MCLEOD, DOC #T10830, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3729

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Isaac D. CASTILLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2484

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00197-CV

In re John Mark Quaak

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator, John Mark Quaak, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

filed a pro se petition seeking a “restraining order with preliminary preventive injunction” in

this Court. Looking to the substance of Quaak’s petition, rather than its title or form, we

construe his petition as a petition for writ of mandamus. See Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel,

997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (courts look to substance of pleading rather than its caption or

form to determine its nature); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2010); Tex. R.

App. P. 52.1. In his petition, Quaak asks us to compel certain named individuals of the law library

staff and administrative staff of the Neal Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to take, or

refrain from taking, particular actions in connection with providing him with legal writing supplies.

This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice or personnel thereof. By statute, this Court has the authority to issue a writ of

mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district” and other

writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. Staff

members of the Neal Unit are not parties against whom we may issue a writ of mandamus. Nor has
Quaak demonstrated that the exercise of our writ power is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. We

have no jurisdiction to grant Quaak any relief.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed For Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: May 3, 2012

2
Antonio M. HERNANDEZ, Sr., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Eusebio G. HERNANDEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1641

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 26, 2017

Following review of the parties' responses to this Court's order to show cause, it is ordered that the above styled appeal is hereby dismissed as moot.

SUAREZ, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ., concur.
Herbert John Thomas WILSON, II, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4495

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Carlos MAXWELL, DOC #H42940, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1698

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
William C. ROUTENBERG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3907

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b) ; *Stovall v. Cooper*, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); *Stokes v. State*, 851 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; *Brown v. State*, 793 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) ; *Brito v. State*, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 73732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29870]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8104]

In the Matter of Amendment of the Designation of al-Qa'ida in 
Iraq, aka Jam'at al Tawhid wa'al-Jihad, aka The Monotheism and Jihad 
Group, aka The al-Zarqawi Network, aka al-Tawhid, aka Tanzim Qa`idat 
al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn, aka The Organization of al-Jihad's Base 
of Operations in Iraq, aka al-Qaida of Jihad in Iraq, aka al-Qaida in 
Iraq, aka al-Qaida in Mesopotamia, aka al-Qaida in the Land of the Two 
Rivers, aka al-Qaida of the Jihad in the Land of the Two Rivers, aka 
al-Qaida of Jihad Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers, aka al-
Qaida Group of Jihad in Iraq, aka al-Qaida Group of Jihad in the Land 
of the Two Rivers, aka The Organization of Jihad's Base in the Country 
of the Two Rivers, aka The Organization Base of Jihad/Country of the 
Two Rivers, aka The Organization of al-Jihad's Base in the Land of the 
Two Rivers, aka The Organization Base of Jihad/Mesopotamia, aka The 
Organization of al-Jihad's Base of Operations in the Land of the Two 
Rivers, aka Tanzeem qa'idat al Jihad/Bildad al Raafidaini, as a Foreign 
Terrorist Organization pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act; To include the aliases Al-Nusrah Front, Jabhat al-
Nusrah, Jabhet al-Nusra, The Victory Front, Al Nusrah Front for the 
People of the Levant

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, the Secretary of State concludes that there is a sufficient 
factual basis to find that al-Qa'ida in Iraq, also known under the 
aliases listed above, uses or has used additional aliases, namely, al-
Nusrah Front, aka Jabhat al-Nusrah, aka Jabhet al-Nusra, aka The 
Victory Front, aka Al Nusrah Front for the People of the Levant.
    Therefore, pursuant to Sec.  219(b) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189(b)), 
the Secretary of State hereby amends the 2004 designation of al-Qa'ida 
in Iraq as a foreign terrorist organization, to include the following 
new alias and other possible transliterations thereof: Al-Nusrah Front, 
Jabhat al-Nusrah, Jabhet al-Nusra, The Victory Front, Al Nusrah Front 
for the People of the Levant.

    Dated: November 20, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-29870 Filed 12-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
##### 



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 15, 2006
    /s/  A. Bradley GabbardA. Bradley GabbardExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Jagdeo SUKRAJ, Appellant, v. Chear PHOEUNG and Jimmy Phoeung, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-159

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

Robert J. Healy Jr., of Salter, Healy, Bassett & Rivera, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Michael C. Clarke and Betsy E. Gallagher of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.

CATLIN, CATHERINE M., Associate Judge.

Jagdeo Sukraj appeals the denial of his posttrial motion for additur or new trial. We reverse the portion of the order denying Sukraj's motion as to past noneconomic damages but affirm in all other respects.

Sukraj sued Chear and Jimmy Phoeung seeking past and future medical expenses and noneconomic damages after a car accident. The jury awarded him $53,431.16 in past medical expenses and $50,000 in future medical expenses but awarded him nothing for past or future noneconomic damages. In his motion and on appeal, Sukraj argued that the jury verdict was inadequate and against the manifest weight of the evidence because he offered unrebutted evidence at trial that he had suffered a permanent, painful injury to his shoulder, neck, and back.

This court reviews the denial of a motion for new trial or additur for an abuse of discretion. *Campbell v. Griffith*, 971 So.2d 232, 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). And "where there is conflicting evidence, the weight to be given that evidence is within the province of the jury." *Id.* (citing *K-Mart Corp. v. Collins*, 707 So.2d 753, 755 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) ). At trial, the evidence that Sukraj had suffered past pain and suffering in his shoulder as a result of the accident was undisputed. Therefore, the verdict awarding him nothing for past noneconomic damages for his shoulder is inadequate, and we reverse the portion of the order on appeal that denies Sukraj's motion seeking additur on that basis. *See**Ellender v. Bricker*, 967 So.2d 1088, 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("[W]here 'the evidence is undisputed or substantially undisputed that a plaintiff has experienced and will experience pain and suffering as a result of an accident, a zero award for pain and suffering is inadequate as a matter of law.' " (quoting *Dolphin Cruise Line, Inc. v. Stassinopoulos*, 731 So.2d 708, 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ) ); *see also* § 768.043(2), Fla. Stat. (2016).

However, because the evidence that Sukraj had suffered past pain and suffering for the injuries to his neck and back and would experience future pain and suffering as a result of the accident was disputed at trial, we affirm the trial court's denial of Sukraj's motion on that basis. On remand, additur should be limited to Sukraj's past pain and suffering for his shoulder injury.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.

KELLY and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, 

INC., as Subrogee of Peter Hulburt Family 

Limited Partnership, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP, et al., 

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00539

Judge Algenon Marbley 

Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff and Defendants Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP, f/k/a SimplexGrinnell LP 

and Heritage Fire Protection, Inc., by and through counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of 

all claims and crossclaims against Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP, f/k/a SimplexGrinnell 

LP and Heritage Fire Protection Company, Inc., in the above-captioned proceeding. Each party 

to bear its own costs. A copy of the declaration containing Plaintiff’s consent to this dismissal is 

attached as Exhibit A. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ John A. Favret /s/ Alan B. McMaster (With Consent) 

John A. Favret (0080427) 

Christina E. Marino (0090614) 

TUCKER ELLIS LLP 

950 Main Avenue, Suite 1100 

Cleveland, OH 44113 

Telephone: 216-696-2678 

Facsimile: 216-592-5009 

E-Mail: john.favret@tuckerellis.com 

christina.marino@tuckerellis.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Johnson Controls 

Fire Protection LP, f/k/a SimplexGrinnell LP 

Alan B. McMaster 

DENENBERG TUFFLEY, PLLC 

28411 Northwestern Highway 

Suite 600 

Southfield, MI 48034 

Telephone: 248-549-3900 

Facsimile: 248-593-5808 

E-Mail: amcmaster@dt-law.com

Attorney for Plaintiff Hanover Insurance 

Group, Inc., a/s/o Peter Hulburt Family 

Limited Partnership

Case: 2:18-cv-00539-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 74
2 

/s/ Thomas J. Connick (With Consent) 

Thomas J. Connick 

CONNICK LAW, LLC 

25550 Chagrin Boulevard 

Suite 101 

Beachwood, OH 44122-7341 

Telephone: 216-364-0512 

Facsimile: 216-609-3446 

E-Mail: tconnick@connicklawllc.com 

Attorney for Defendant Heritage Fire 

Company, Inc. 

Case: 2:18-cv-00539-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 75
3 

016033\000001\3787142.1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

A copy of the foregoing was filed electronically on June 22, 2018. Service of this filing 

will be made by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system and by email to: 

Alan B. McMaster 

DENENBERG TUFFLEY, PLLC 

28411 Northwestern Highway 

Suite 600 

Southfield, MI 48034 

Telephone: 248-549-3900 

Facsimile: 248-593-5808 

amcmaster@dt-law.com

Attorney for Plaintiff Hanover Insurance 

Group, Inc., a/s/o Peter Hulburt Family 

Limited Partnership 

Thomas J Connick 

CONNICK LAW, LLC 

25550 Chagrin Boulevard 

Suite 101 

Beachwood, OH 44122-7341 

Telephone: 216-364-0512 

Facsimile: 216-609-3446 

tconnick@connicklawllc.com

Attorney for Defendant 

Heritage Fire Company, Inc.

/s/ John A. Favret

One of the Attorneys for Defendant Johnson 

Controls Fire Protection LP, f/k/a 

SimplexGrennell LP 

Case: 2:18-cv-00539-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 11 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 76
Richard John DIRENZO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3035

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

Gary Goldman,

Plaintiff

-vs- Case No. 1:01-cv-125

Equitable Life Assurance 

Society of the United States,

Defendant

JUDGMENT

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The

issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been

rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered on the complaint in favor

of Defendant.

Date: March 7, 2005 James Bonini, Clerk

 By: s/Mary C. Brown 

 Mary C. Brown, Deputy Clerk

Case 1:01-cv-00125-SSB-TSH Document 159 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 1 of 1