alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 8435 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 049 - AD
# Email Protection

## You are unable to access this email address nationalparks.org

The website from which you got to this page is protected by Cloudflare. Email addresses on that page have been hidden in order to keep them from being accessed by malicious bots. **You must enable Javascript in your browser in order to decode the e-mail address**.

If you have a website and are interested in protecting it in a similar way, you can sign up for Cloudflare.

                  - How does Cloudflare protect email addresses on website from spammers?
                  - Can I sign up for Cloudflare?

Cloudflare Ray ID: **876defd6fa452992**•      Your IP:      Click to reveal68.60.74.180•Performance & security byCloudflare
Devoe THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3145

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### People v Potter,

No. 91710;

Court of Appeals No. 125180.
February 29, 2012

Esta Rosenberg, Chief

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: 30

- Day Codeshare Notice of American Airlines

(BA* on AA) (DOT

- OST

- 2002

- 13861)

____________

Dea r Ms. Rosenberg :

American Airlines, Inc., under Order 2010

- 7

- 8, July 20,

2010, Appendix A, condition (2), hereby provides notice that, no

sooner than 30 days from today, we will introduce the following

additional code share service with British Airways Plc (BA* on

flights operated by American or American Eagle):

Chicago

- Cozumel

Mexico City

Puerto Vallarta

Da llas/Ft. Worth

- Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo

Mexico City

Morelia

Queretaro

Veracruz

Miami

- Mexico City- 2

–

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________ CARL B. NELSON

Associate General Counsel

American Airlines, Inc.

1101 17 th Street, N.W.

Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20036

cc: Docket Branch

Paul Gretch

Brett Kruger

Brian Hedberg

Service list**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email

on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com

scott.mcclain@delta.com steve.morrissey@united.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com

kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com

r bkeiner@crowell.com dhainbach@ggh

- airlaw.com

esahr@eckertseamons.com rpommer@atlasair.com

russell.bailey@alpa.org eskraft@jamhoff.com

jonathan.linde@united.co m dpdean@jamhoff.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com

robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com

msinick@ssd.com willim.stallings@usdoj.gov

cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

gbleopard@fedex.com john.allen@faa.gov

david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com urskr@state.gov

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com recohn@hoganlovells.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com

lhalloway@crowell.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

efaberman@wileyrein.com lachter@starpower.net

mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com

howard.kass@usairways.com jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com gmurphy@crowell.com

da n.weiss@united .com

________________________________ CARL B. NELSON

February 29, 2012
<PAGE>   1
                             APPLIED INNOVATION INC.

                                   Exhibit 11

              Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share

              For the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   1998            1997             1996
                                                   ----            ----             ----
<S>                                             <C>             <C>              <C>
Weighted average number of common
    shares outstanding - used for
    computation of basic earnings (loss)
    per share                                    15,804,608      15,786,332       15,742,760

Add net shares issuable pursuant to stock
    option plans less shares assumed
    repurchased at the average market price         158,238               0          119,488
                                                -----------     -----------      -----------

Number of shares for computation of
    diluted earnings (loss) per share            15,962,846      15,786,332       15,862,248
                                                ===========     ===========      ===========

Net income (loss) for basic and diluted
    earnings (loss) per share                   $ 2,309,652     $  (637,195)     $ 2,154,568
                                                ===========     ===========      ===========


Basic earnings (loss) per share                 $       .15     $      (.04)     $       .14
                                                ===========     ===========      ===========

Diluted earnings (loss) per share               $       .14     $      (.04)     $       .14
                                                ===========     ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
James Robert GAINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | information   contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the   financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|            | By: | /s/ PAUL   G. GABOS                      
|----------- | --- | -----------------------------------------
|            |     |                                          
|            |     | Paul G.   Gabos   Chief Financial Officer
|May 9, 2005 |     |
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1036 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1036

    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to 
   authorize rewards under the Department of State's rewards program 
 relating to information regarding individuals or entities engaged in 
    activities in contravention of United States or United Nations 
                   sanctions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2021

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. Deutch) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to 
   authorize rewards under the Department of State's rewards program 
 relating to information regarding individuals or entities engaged in 
    activities in contravention of United States or United Nations 
                   sanctions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bassam Barabandi Rewards for Justice 
Act''.

SECTION 2. AMENDMENT TO DEPARTMENT OF STATE REWARDS PROGRAM.

    Subsection (b) of section 36 of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (11), by striking ``or'' after the 
        semicolon at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph.
            ``(13) the identification or location of an individual or 
        entity that--
                    ``(A) knowingly, directly or indirectly, imports, 
                exports, or reexports to, into, or from any country any 
                goods, services, or technology controlled for export by 
                the United States because of the use of such goods, 
                services, or technology in contravention of a United 
                States or United Nations sanction; or
                    ``(B) knowingly, directly or indirectly, provides 
                training, advice, or other services or assistance, or 
                engages in significant financial transactions, relating 
                to any such goods, services, or technology in 
                contravention of such sanction.''.
                                 <all>
```
Jose ALVAREZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4100

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 25, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed for failure of the Appellant to comply with this court's two October 18, 2017, orders.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                           STATER BROS. HOLDINGS INC.
                    Calculation of Earnings Per Common Share
                                   (Unaudited)
          (In thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         13 Weeks Ended           39 Weeks Ended
                                                      ---------------------    --------------------
                                                      June 29,    June 28,     June 29,    June 28,
                                                        1997        1998         1997        1998
                                                      --------    --------     --------    --------
<S>                                                    <C>          <C>             <C>        <C>
Net income (loss)                                     $  4,078    $ (1,185)      12,627    $  1,413

Less preferred dividends                                 1,816          --        5,448          --
                                                      --------    --------     --------    --------

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders    $  2,262    $ (1,185)    $  7,179    $  1,413
                                                      ========    ========     ========    ========

Earnings (loss) per common share                      $  45.24    $ (23.70)    $ 143.58    $  28.26
                                                      ========    ========     ========    ========

Average common shares outstanding                       50,000      50,000       50,000      50,000
                                                      ========    ========     ========    ========

Common shares outstanding at end of period              50,000      50,000       50,000      50,000
                                                      ========    ========     ========    ========
</TABLE>



                                       21
Shirley Jean HOLLEY v. STATE

CR-15-1138

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 17 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 

amendment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That notwithstanding any time limit contained in House 

4 Joint Resolution 208, 92d Congress, as agreed to in the 

5 Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment 
2 

•HJ 17 EH 

1 proposed to the States in that joint resolution shall be 

2 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the United 

3 States Constitution whenever ratified by the legislatures 

4 of three-fourths of the several States. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 17, 

2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 17 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the 

equal rights amendment.
Exhibit No. 10.2

# AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This AMENDMENT NO. 3 made as of the
2nd day of September, 2003, to the Employment Agreement made as of the 20th day
of November, 1998 (as amended, the Agreement), between UNITED RETAIL GROUP,
INC., a Delaware corporation, with principal offices at 365 West Passaic Street,
Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662-6563, and GEORGE R. REMETA, residing at 25 Lee Way,
Oakland, New Jersey 07436.

WHEREAS, capitalized terms
used herein and defined in the Agreement shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement;

WHEREAS,  the Executive  has been  employed by the Company as its Vice  Chairman and Chief  Administrative
Officer;

WHEREAS, the Company desires
to continue the services of the Executive, and the Executive desires to continue to
provide such services to the Company, on the terms set forth in the Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the provisions of
this Amendment were recommended by the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board
of Directors on August 28, 2003, and approved by the Companys Board of Directors on
August 29, 2003 with the Executive abstaining.

NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations hereinafter set forth, the parties
hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

1.    
          Section 1(u) of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

| | (u) | Term of Employment shall mean the period of time commencing on November
               20, 1998 and ending on July 30, 2008 or such later date as may be mutually
               agreed upon by the Company and the Executive. (For the avoidance of doubt, Term
               of Employment as used herein may extend beyond the termination of the
               Executives employment.)"
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2.     Section 15(a) of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety, as follows:

| | (a) | The Company shall indemnify the Executive as provided in the By-laws as in
               effect on August 29, 2003.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3.     All the other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in force unchanged.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement in Rochelle Park, New Jersey, in
duplicate originals on September 2, 2003.

| | UNITED RETAIL GROUP,INC.                                                
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:/s/RAPHAEL BENAROYAName: Raphael BenaroyaTitle: Chairman of the Board
| |                                                                         
| | /s/GEORGE R. REMETAGeorge R. Remeta                                     

GRR Amend 3 to Employment
Agr.

KPC:jmt
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

GERALD BULLOCKS, : Case No. 1:18-cv-434

:

Plaintiff, : 

: Judge Timothy S. Black

vs. : Magistrate Judge Karen Litkovitz

 :

RON ERDOS, et al., :

 :

Defendants. :

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 5) AND

TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge 

reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 11, 2018, submitted a Report 

and Recommendation. (Doc. 5). No objections were filed.

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo 

all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in 

its entirety. 

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1) Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1); and 
2

2) The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this 

Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore Plaintiff is denied leave 

to appeal in forma pauperis. 

3) The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ________________ ________________________ 

 Timothy S. Black

 United States District Judge 

8/17/18
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 7, 2009
    /s/  Christopher T. HutterChristopher T. HutterVice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 9, 2013 | /s/ Brian D. Jellison                             |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|              | Brian D. Jellison                                 |
|              | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer   |
|              | (Principal Executive Officer)                     |
|              |                                              |
|              | /s/ John Humphrey                                 |
|              | John Humphrey                                     |
|              | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|              | (Principal Financial Officer)                     |
EXHIBIT 21.1








SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT










P.A.M. Transport, Inc. (Arkansas Corporation)





P.A.M. Dedicated Services, Inc. (Ohio Corporation)





P.A.M. Logistics Services, Inc. (Arkansas Corporation)





T.T.X., Inc. (Texas Corporation)





Choctaw Express, Inc. (Oklahoma Corporation)





Choctaw Brokerage, Inc. (Oklahoma Corporation)





Allen Freight Services, Inc. (Missouri Corporation)





Decker Transport Co., Inc. (Ohio Corporation)





Transcend Logistics, Inc. (Indiana Corporation)





East Coast Transport and Logistics, LLC (Arkansas LLC)





S & L Logistics, Inc. (Texas Corporation)





P.A.M. International, Inc. (Ohio Corporation)





P.A.M. Canada, Inc. (Canadian Corporation)
### -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000799166
<NAME> MASSBANK CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           8,150
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             941
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               115,245
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 6,819
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    456,101
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             402
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               402
<LOANS>                                        249,185
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (2,529)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 854,542
<DEPOSITS>                                     753,657
<SHORT-TERM>                                       992
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,983
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,093
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,425
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 854,542
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,498
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               31,432
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,681
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                56,611
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              30,896
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,896
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,715
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      170
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  92
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,315
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      14,315
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,759
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.15
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,428
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,428
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,566
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (249)
<RECOVERIES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,529
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,503
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             26
        

</TABLE>
#### Garratt v Kregoski,

No. 90936;

Court of Appeals No. 136363.

Levin, J. I would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.