alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

STEVEN B. BARGER, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FIRST DATA CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

Civil Case No. EDNY: 1:17-cv-04869-FB-LB 

Civil Case No. 1:18-mc-00010-SJD-SKB 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR KELLY TO REPLY 

Defendants First Data Corporation, Frank Bisignano, Dan Charron, Anthony Marino, 

Karen Whalen, and Rhonda Johnson respectfully submit this Motion to Shorten the Time for 

Julie Kelly to Reply to ECF Nos. 24 and 25. 

1. On October 2, 2018, Kelly filed a Rule 72 Objection (ECF No. 24) to the Court’s 

September 19, 2018 Order (ECF No. 21), which had granted Defendants’ Motion to Compel. 

2. Defendants filed their opposition (ECF No. 25) on October 5, 2018. 

3. The Local Rules provide that a party may file a reply to an opposition within 14 

days of service. Thus, pursuant to the Local Rules, Kelly’s reply memorandum is due by October 

18, 2018. 

4. However, the Court’s Order dated September 19, 2018 (ECF No. 21) compels 

Kelly to appear for her deposition on October 15, 2018. 

5. Accordingly, Defendants request that any reply to their opposition be shortened to 

a period of five days and be filed by 5 PM on Wednesday, October 10, 2018. Defendants must 

make travel arrangements for the October 15, 2018 deposition of Kelly and need to know 

whether the deposition will proceed as compelled by the Court. 

Case: 1:18-mc-00010-SJD-SKB Doc #: 26 Filed: 10/05/18 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 749
-2- 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew R. Byrne 

Matthew R. Byrne (0082228) 

JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 

PNC Center, 26th Floor 

201 E. Fifth Street 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

Telephone: (513) 898-0050 

Facsimile: (513) 898-0051 

Email: matthew.byrne@jacksonlewis.com 

Local Counsel for Defendants 

Of Counsel: 

Gillian A. Cooper, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) 

650 College Road East, Suite 4000 

Princeton, New Jersey 08540 

T: (609) 452-5021 

Gillian.Cooper@saul.com 

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: October 5, 2018 

Case: 1:18-mc-00010-SJD-SKB Doc #: 26 Filed: 10/05/18 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 750
-3- 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on the following 

via regular mail and electronic mail: 

Julie Kelly 

823 Dorgene Lane 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45244 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on the following 

via electronic mail: 

David A. Zeitlin, Esq. 

Zeitlin & Zeitlin, P.C. 

50 Court Street, Suite 506 

Brooklyn, New York 11201 

T: (718) 522-5644 

david@zeitlinlawfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Shawn E. Shearer, Esq. 

The Law Office of Shawn Shearer, P.C. 

3839 McKinney Avenue, Suite 155-254 

Dallas, Texas 75204 

T: (214) 434-1594 

shawn@shearerlaw.pro 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/s/ Matthew R. Byrne 

Matthew R. Byrne 

Dated: October 5, 2018

Case: 1:18-mc-00010-SJD-SKB Doc #: 26 Filed: 10/05/18 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 751
Rodrick HENDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4816

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**ORDER** PAGE 1
.



### 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 **IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO.**  **DA 20 -**  **0070** IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: SHA RILYN J. SIMONSEN,

Petitioner/Appellee , vs. RUSSEL A. SIMONSEN ,

Respondent/Appellant . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPREME COURT CAUSE No . DA 20 - 0070 DISTRICT COURT CAUSE No. CDR- 1 8 - 02 1 6

**ORDER**

UPON REVIEW of the Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Briefs and with good cause being shown; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s opening brief is due August 10, 2020. CC:

- Appellant, c/o Patrick F. Flaherty

- Appellee, c/o Jeffrey S. Ferguson

- Appellee, c/o Dana A. Henkel

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 7 2020

07/07/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0070
Case 1:01-cv-00130-SAS-TSH Document 52 Filed 12/29/2003 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:01-cv-00130-SAS-TSH Document 52 Filed 12/29/2003 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:01-cv-00130-SAS-TSH Document 52 Filed 12/29/2003 Page 3 of 3
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ramsey Joel Hinojosa

, * From the 106th District Court

of Dawson County,

Trial Court No. 14

- 7401.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00302

- CR * April 14, 2016

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

the appeal is dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., 

POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This document relates to:

HELMICK, RICHARD

 Case No. 2:18-md-2846

 JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

 

 Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-03186

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

COMES NOW Plaintiff, Richard Helmick, and Defendants, Davol Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.,

through their respective counsel of record and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate and agree that the above-captioned action, Case No. 2:20-cv03186, is voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. The parties agree that any re-filing of the case 

must be in this MDL, 2:18-md-2846. The parties further agree that the statute of limitations 

applicable to the claims asserted by Plaintiff in the present action shall not be tolled during the 

pendency of this action or from the time from dismissal until re-filing. Each side will bear its 

own costs.

Date: October 20, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Eric Alexander

Eric Alexander, Esq.

Reed Smith LLP

1301 K Street NW

East Tower Ste. 1000

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: 202-414-9200

Fax: 202-414-9299

Email: ealexander@reedsmith.com

Counsel for Defendants Davol, Inc. and C.R. 

Bard, Inc.

/s/ Jeff T. Seldomridge 

Jeff T. Seldomridge Esq.

THE MILLER FIRM, LLC

The Sherman Building

108 Railroad Avenue

Orange, VA 22960

Phone: (866) 529-3323

Fax: (540) 672-3055

E-mail: jseldomridge@millerfirmllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 441 Filed: 10/20/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 5871
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 20, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing document with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 

CM/ECF participants registered to receive service in this MDL.

/s/ Jeff Seldomridge 

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 441 Filed: 10/20/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 5872
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  information   extracted  from  the  financial
statements of the December 31, 1998 Form 10-K of National Income Fund 6 L.P. and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,287,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,324,042
<PP&E>                                      24,058,394
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,360,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,021,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          308,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,712,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,021,712
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,275,896
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,526,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               576,554
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,681
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            172,681
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   172,681
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">DDEH 103 E 102 LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Chris Jasabe and Mariela Salas, Respondents-Tenants-Respondents.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Landlord, as limited by its briefs, appeals from those portions of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jack Stoller, J.), dated November 10, 2016, which conditionally granted tenants' post-eviction motion to vacate a so-ordered stipulation of settlement, final judgment and warrant of eviction, and to be restored to possession in a nonpayment summary proceeding.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Jack Stoller, J.), dated November 10, 2016, reversed, with $10 costs, motion denied, and the stipulation of settlement, final judgment and warrant of eviction are reinstated.</p><p>Civil Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting tenants' second application for post-eviction relief in this nonpayment proceeding. Notwithstanding the unregulated, short-term tenants' execution of a stipulation requiring payment of $8,175 arrears pursuant to a specified payment schedule, and the subsequent grant of several extensions of time, both before and after tenants' September 30, 2016 eviction, tenants were still unable to pay the accumulated arrears of some $18,000 owed through the November 2016 return date of their second post-eviction motion. Under the circumstances, tenants' motion to vacate the stipulation, judgment and warrant should have been denied (<a href="../2009/2009_08687.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Chelsea 19 Assoc. v James</i>, 67 AD3d 601</a> [2009]).</p><p>The belated attempt by tenants' incoming counsel to inject an unpleaded rent forfeiture defense in the settled litigation by way of a (second) post-eviction motion does not provide a proper basis to vacate the stipulation (<i>see Hallock v State of New York</i>, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]; <a href="../2009/2009_52075.htm" target="_blank"><i>Montgomery Trading LLC v Siegel</i>, 25 Misc 3d 128</a>[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52075[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2009]). Such defense does not implicate the court's subject matter jurisdiction and was waived by tenants when they executed the stipulation (<a href="../2005/2005_01202.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Matter of Meaders v Jones</i>, 15 AD3d 490</a> [2005]; <i>433 W. Assoc. v Murdock</i>, 276 AD2d 360 [2000]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: October 05, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.2B


                            AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS

                                       OF

                             INFORMIX CORPORATION
                            A DELAWARE CORPORATION


     I, Gary Lloyd, as Secretary of INFORMIX CORPORATION, certify that:

     1.   I am the Secretary of INFORMIX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation 
(the "Corporation").

     2.   On April 24, 1998, the Board of Directors of the Corporation 
approved the following amendment to Article III, Section 1 of the Bylaws of 
the Corporation:

          Section 1.  Management.  The property, business and affairs of the 
     Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of a Board of 
     Directors. The number of directors of the Corporation (including 
     directors to be elected by the holders of any one or more series of 
     Preferred Stock voting separately as a class or classes) shall be six 
     (6). As used in these Bylaws, the terms "whole Board" or "whole Board of 
     Directors" mean the total number of directors which the Corporation 
     would have if there were no vacancies. In addition to the powers and 
     authorities by these Bylaws and the Certificate of Incorporation 
     expressly conferred upon it, the Board of Directors may exercise all 
     such powers of the Corporation, and do all such lawful acts and things 
     as are not by statute or by the Certificate of Incorporation or by these 
     Bylaws directed or required to be exercised or done by the stockholders.


Effective April 24, 1998               INFORMIX CORPORATION

                                       /s/ Gary Lloyd
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Gary Lloyd, Secretary
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 1 of 15  PAGEID #: 1537

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 2 of 15  PAGEID #: 1538

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 3 of 15  PAGEID #: 1539

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 4 of 15  PAGEID #: 1540

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 5 of 15  PAGEID #: 1541

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 6 of 15  PAGEID #: 1542

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 7 of 15  PAGEID #: 1543

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 8 of 15  PAGEID #: 1544

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 9 of 15  PAGEID #: 1545

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 10 of 15  PAGEID #: 1546

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 11 of 15  PAGEID #: 1547

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 12 of 15  PAGEID #: 1548

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 13 of 15  PAGEID #: 1549

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 14 of 15  PAGEID #: 1550

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 232-6 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 15 of 15  PAGEID #: 1551
### Signed by the Administrator - SO2 NAAQS

Joseph-J Dougherty to: Lydia Wegman, Richard Wayland, Rosalina Rodriguez, Karen Martin, Jackie Ashley, Kathy Kaufman, Larry Wallace, Michael Stewart, Nealson Watkins, Rhonda Thompson, Tricia Crabtree, Valerie Broadwell, James Hemby, Jenny Noonan, Jan Cortelyou-Lee, Kelly Rimer, Brenda Millar 06/02/2010 08:45 PM

Cc: Mary Henigin, Alan Rush History: This message has been replied to.

File below for web.
Owner: Osage Nation

UAS: DJI Phantom 3 Professional

Flight #Operator(Print) Location Date Starting Time Ending Time Total Time Signature

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

 Osage Nation Flight log
Owner: Osage Nation

UAS: DJI Phantom 3 Professional

# Date Maintenance Performed Description/Notes Signature

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 Osage Nation Maintenance log
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BrandPartners Group, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), James F. Brooks,
      Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Suzanne
      Verrill, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            to
                my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                Section
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                    James F. BrooksJames
                    F. BrooksChairman
                    and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
                  29,
                  2007
 /s/ Suzanne
                  M. VerrillSuzanne
                  M. VerrillChief
                  Financial OfficerAs of March
                1,
                2007










A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to BrandPartners Group, Inc. and will be
      retained by BrandPartners and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
### NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 470

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

THANH HUU NGUYEN AND

ANH THI TRAM VO

, Appellant s

,

v.

JOSHUA KESSLER AND

JESSICA KESSLER Appellee s

.

_

___________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Guadalupe County, Texas.

_

___________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria2 This cause is before the Court on appellants’ voluntary motion to dismiss and

appellees’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

. 1 Appell ees assert the underlying trial

court has not disposed of all pending parties and cl aims.

In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review

final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. Lehmann v. Har

Con Corp ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because there is no final judgment or order

subject to appeal, the notice of appeal is premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 27.1(a)

.

Accordingly, the motion s to dismiss are GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED

FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(a).

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

D elivered and filed on the

21st day of January , 20 21

.

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio , pursuant to

docket equalization order Misc. Docket No. 20

- 9 117 issued by the Supreme Court of Texas.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Steven A. NICHOLSON, a/k/a S. Co. Nicholson, Sheri A. Nicholson, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 13, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, 

INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA 

MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

Case No. 2:18-md-2846

Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

This document relates to: 

Luks et al. v. Davol, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00103

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a motion for remand by Plaintiffs Stephen Luks, Karen 

Savage, Darren Stevenson, and the Estate of Linda Luks. (Mot., Case No. 2:18-md-2846, ECF 

No. 854; Case No. 2:19-cv-00103, ECF No. 27.) This case is subject to a limited stay during 

which the parties may not file any motion or seek remand except as provided in Case 

Management Orders 52 and 53. (Case No. 2:18-md-2846, ECF Nos. 850, 851.) As this motion 

is not permitted during the pendency of the stay, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file this Order on the MDL docket and the Luks 

docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9/16/2024 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 858 Filed: 09/16/24 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 9478
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO APR IG PMiost
WESTERNDIVISION ;

INRE:

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL

ASSISTANCE FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN CINCINNATI, OHIO, U.S.A.

IN THE MATTER OF

FAUSTO EDUARDO AGUIAR FALCONI
V. DAYID AGUIAR VALLEJO, ET, AL.

Misc.No. ()1&% me G&

wee SH SS ere SU

EX PARTE ORDER
WHEREAS, the United States, by its counsel, Benjamin C. Glassman, United States
Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, by Nicholas J. Pantel, Assistant United States
Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, on behalf of the United States District Court in
Cincinnati, Ohio, in Fausto Eduardo Aguiar Falconi v. David Aguiar Vallejo, et al., Civil Case
No. 17203201607194, through its Application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, is seeking to
obtain certain information from Procter & Gamble Company, for use in connection with a

judicial proceeding in the Ecuadorian Court in Ecuador; and

WHEREAS upon review of the request issued by the Ecuadorian Court in Ecuador: in
Fausto Eduardo Aguiar Falconi v. David Aguiar Vallejo, et al., seeking evidence from
individuals or entities who may be found within the jurisdiction of this Court for use in said

judicial proceedings in Ecuador, and the Court being fully informed in the premises.

NOW THEREFORE, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, pursuant to the authority

contained in Title 28, United States Code Section 1782(a) and Rule 28(a) of the Federal Rules


of Civil Procedure that Nicholas J. Pantel, Assistant United States Attorney forthe Southern
District of Ohio, hereby is appointed as Commissioner of this Court, to obtain by subpoena the
requested evidence from Procter & Gamble Company for transmission to the Office of
International Judicial Assistance, United States Department of Justice, for transmission to the to
the U.S. Department of State to be sent back to the Ecuadorian Court through diplomatic
channels: in Fausto Eduardo Aguiar Falconi v. David Aguiar Vallejo, et al.; and to do all else

that may be necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose of this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Attorney's Office shall provide

Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, with a copy of this Order and the accompanying

documents.

j
This the/@_day of Lute 2018.

Blam gC ott.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE @NDGE
J.A., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-0005

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Travis Dunnington, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Ciklin, Conner, JJ., and Roberts, Kathleen, Associate Judge, concur.