alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
6/22/2022

12:34 PM Expenses by Client

Marshall Forman & Schlein, LLC

Page 1

Selection Criteria

Slip.Classification Open

Slip.Slip Type Expense

Slip.Transaction Date Earliest - 6/22/2022

Clie.Selection Include: 1McFadden fee

Acti.Selection Include: Witness Fee

Rate Info - identifies rate source and level

Slip ID Timekeeper Units Rate Slip Value

Dates and Time

Posting Status

Description

Activity

Client

Reference

DNB Time

Est. Time

Variance

Rate Info

Bill Status

Client: 1McFadden fee 

558016 EXP Firm 1 59.89 59.89

5/25/2022

WIP 1McFadden fee

Witness Fee

Witness fee-Gary Dunlap; $40 + 34 miles @

$0.585/mile; Paid via M&F T ch 1809

558017 EXP Firm 1 54.04 54.04

5/25/2022

WIP 1McFadden fee

Witness Fee

Witness fee-Kimberly Jacobs; $40 + 24 miles @

$0.585/mile; Paid via M&F T ch 1810

558018 EXP Firm 1 57.67 57.67

5/25/2022

WIP 1McFadden fee

Witness Fee

Witness fee-Rhonda Grizzell; $40+ 30.2 miles @

$0.585/mile; Paid via M&F T ch 1811

Billable

Unbillable

Total

0.00

0.00

0.00

171.60

0.00

171.60

Total: 1McFadden fee

Billable

Unbillable

Total

0.00

0.00

0.00

171.60

0.00

171.60

Grand Total

Case: 2:18-cv-00544-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 109-1 Filed: 06/23/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 5878
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Nabors Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration Numbers
333-57129, 333-11313, 33-87322, 33-87324, 33-47521, 33-45097, 33-36229,
33-56000, 33-54858, 333-92483, 333-91829, 333-91743, 333-87069, 333-86289 and
333-76077), on Form S-4 (Registration Numbers 333-72397 and 333-84781) and on
Form S-3 (Registration Numbers 333-25233 and 333-81137) of our report dated
February 9, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.





Houston, Texas
March 30, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,325                  40,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,189                  47,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100                   2,188
<INVENTORY>                                     23,437                  44,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,311                 145,831
<PP&E>                                          55,635                  42,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,410                  16,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,701                 198,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,611                  46,735
<BONDS>                                         26,695                  30,269
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           147                     174
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,190                 131,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,701                 198,065
<SALES>                                        148,690                 144,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,690                 144,688
<CGS>                                           85,061                  82,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,491                  69,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,031                   1,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,762)                 (8,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,399)                 (2,951)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,363)                 (5,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,294)                (28,564)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,657)                (33,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.78)                  (2.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.78)                  (2.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### Johnny KING Jr. *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 74-32

510 S.W. 2d 876

Opinion delivered June 17, 1974

[Rehearing denied July 22, 1974.]

*Kenneth C. Coffelt,*for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *O.H. Hargraves,*Dep. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of burglary and a three year sentence in the Department of Correction was assessed. For reversal of that judgment appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to establish intent to commit larceny as charged in the information. We cannot agree.

A burglary is committed whenever anyone unlawfully breaks or enters a building “with the intent to commit .... larceny.” Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-1001 (Repl. 1964). The appellant was found by the police lying on the floor in a local junior high school. They had responded to an alarm system installed at the school and arrived within approximately four minutes. A glass window next to the entrance door was broken sufficiently to permit entry into the building. Inside the building was a jack handle which belonged to the appellant. A padlock and chain were broken off the gymnasium door leading into the football area and that door was *779physical education equipment in the gymnasium. No property was missing from the building.

It is not necessary that the intent to commit burglary be consummated in order to constitute that offense. *Clay*v. *State,*236 Ark. 398, 366 S.W. 2d 299 (1963). There we reiterated the well established rule that the offense can be established by proof of circumstances from which the intent to commit larceny can fairly be inferred. To the same effect is *Scates and Blaylock*v. *State,*244 Ark. 333, 424 S.W. 2d 876 (1968), where we found the evidence sufficient to constitute the crime of burglary when one of the appellants was found hiding in a cafe restroom with a tire tool on the floor near him and the other appellant was secreted in the kitchen. The evidence indicated entrance through a broken window. Nothing was found missing. § 41-1002 provides that the manner of breaking is material to show the intent of the offender.

In the case at bar appellant testified about the circumstances of his presence in the building. According to him he was forced at gun point to break into the building by an unidentified individual. He acknowledged the jack handle was his and that the police arrived within five minutes from the time the breaking occurred.

When we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee, as we must do on appeal, we are of the view that ample substantial evidence exists to sustain the jury’s finding. The credibility of appellant’s version was for the jury to determine.

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Joe HOLT

CR-15-1447

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1036 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1036

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2021

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to 
   authorize rewards under the Department of State's rewards program 
 relating to information regarding individuals or entities engaged in 
    activities in contravention of United States or United Nations 
                   sanctions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bassam Barabandi Rewards for Justice 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO DEPARTMENT OF STATE REWARDS PROGRAM.

    Subsection (b) of section 36 of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (11), by striking ``or'' after the 
        semicolon at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(13) the identification or location of an individual or 
        entity that--
                    ``(A) knowingly, directly or indirectly, imports, 
                exports, or reexports to, into, or from any country any 
                goods, services, or technology controlled for export by 
                the United States because of the use of such goods, 
                services, or technology in contravention of a United 
                States or United Nations sanction; or
                    ``(B) knowingly, directly or indirectly, provides 
                training, advice, or other services or assistance, or 
                engages in significant financial transactions, relating 
                to any such goods, services, or technology in 
                contravention of such sanction.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2021.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        766,742
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 149,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                   46,828
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,054,906 
<PP&E>                                        982,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                270,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             24,031,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,019,456
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        39
<COMMON>                                      207,534
<OTHER-SE>                                 22,804,544
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               24,031,574
<SALES>                                       111,605 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              126,847
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            6,858,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            188,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (6,731,478)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (6,731,478)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                              (6,731,478)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.34)
<FN>

Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line item on the Balance
Sheet or Statement of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>
         

</TABLE>
Leonardo MORENO-GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-462

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Carmike Cinemas, Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation, certifies that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. /s/ Michael W. PatrickMichael W. PatrickPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of DirectorsMarch
16, 2005
Exhibit 3.7

                   ACTION BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT BY THE
                               BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                          IN LIEU OF A SPECIAL MEETING
                                       OF
                       BESTNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

     The undersigned, constituting the all of the members of the Board of
Directors of BestNet Communications Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the
"Corporation"), by unanimous consent in writing pursuant to the authority
contained in Section 78.315 of the General Corporation Laws of the State of
Nevada, without the formality of convening a meeting, do hereby adopt and
approve the following actions of the Corporation:

     RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby authorizes and directs that
     the number of authorized shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of
     BestNet Communications Corporation be decreased by Six Hundred Fifty (650)
     so that the number of authorized shares of Series A Convertible Preferred
     Stock be, and hereby is, reduced to Zero (0) shares and that such Six
     Hundred (650) shares shall resume the status of authorized but unissued
     shares of Preferred Stock not allocated to any series.

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Board of Directors hereby authorizes and directs
     that the number of authorized shares of Series B Convertible Preferred
     Stock of BestNet Communications Corporation be decreased by One Thousand
     (1,000) so that the number of authorized shares of Series B Convertible
     Preferred Stock be, and hereby is, reduced to Zero (0) shares and that such
     One Thousand (1,000) shares shall resume the status of authorized but
     unissued shares of Preferred Stock not allocated to any series.

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Board of Directors hereby authorizes and directs
     that the number of authorized shares of Series C 8% Cumulative Convertible
     Preferred Stock of BestNet Communications Corporation be decreased by Ten
     Thousand (10,000) so that the number of authorized shares of Series C 8%
     Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock be, and hereby is, reduced to Zero
     (0) shares and that such Ten Thousand (10,000) shares shall resume the
     status of authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock not allocated
     to any series.

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that this Action by Unanimous Written Consent, when
     executed by the proper signatories hereto, shall be effective as of April
     24, 2003.


                                            /s/  Robert A. Blanchard
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Robert A. Blanchard, Chairman


                                            /s/  Paul H. Jachim
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Paul H. Jachim, Secretary

                                            CONSTITUTING ALL OF THE MEMBERS OF
                                            THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BESTNET
                                            COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         $60,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               $3,819,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                $1,230,000
<INVENTORY>                                 $1,145,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $3,983,000
<PP&E>                                      $4,628,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              $3,105,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $6,832,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $4,681,000
<BONDS>                                       $867,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        $4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  $1,280,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $6,832,000
<SALES>                                     $8,919,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $8,919,000
<CGS>                                       $3,857,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $3,857,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            $4,893,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              $134,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $269,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $(211,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                $(211,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $(.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(.05)
        

</TABLE>
James Ronald WELCH, Jr, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3584

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,928,482
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,239,551
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   1,012,950
<MORTGAGE>                                      45,494
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               6,147,331
<CASH>                                       1,512,570
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             929,429
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         742,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,544,136
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,066,991
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          2,268,841
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 155,311
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              1,501,669
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,763
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,544,136
<PREMIUMS>                                     778,996
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             94,151
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              45,483
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 575,848
<BENEFITS>                                     292,280
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    448,157
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,043,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (289,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (289,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
K. H., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4340

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.