6042 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 23 / Thursday, February 3, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This action directly regulates growers, 

food processors, food handlers, and food 

retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does 

this action alter the relationships or 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities established by Congress 

in the preemption provisions of FFDCA 

section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency 

has determined that this action will not 

have a substantial direct effect on States 

or Tribal Governments, on the 

relationship between the National 

Government and the States or Tribal 

Governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

Tribes. Thus, the Agency has 

determined that Executive Order 13132, 

entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 

13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 

9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In 

addition, this action does not impose 

any enforceable duty or contain any 

unfunded mandate as described under 

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et 

seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

X. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: January 20, 2022. 

Marietta Echeverria, 

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office 

of Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR 

chapter I as follows: 

PART 180—TOLERANCES AND 

EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE 

CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.960, amend table 1 by 

adding, in alphabetical order, the 

polymer ‘‘Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl)-ahydro-w-hydroxy-, polymer with 

poly(isocyanatoalkyl) benzene, alkylolblocked, number average molecular 

weight (Mn), 18,721’’ to read as follows: 

§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance. 

* * * * * 

Polymer CAS No. 

*******

Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl)-a-hydro-w-hydroxy-, polymer with poly(isocyanatoalkyl) benzene, alkylol-blocked, 

number average molecular weight (Mn), 18,721.

(No CAS Reg. No. Associated). 

* * * * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2022–02100 Filed 2–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

41 CFR Parts 102–35 and 102–37 

[FMR Case 2018–102–6; Docket No. GSA– 

FMR–2019–0007, Sequence No. 2] 

RIN 3090–AJ98 

Federal Management Regulation 

(FMR); Personal Property; Multiple 

Repeal or Replace Regulatory Actions; 

Multiple FMR Parts 

AGENCY: Office of Government-wide 

Policy (OGP), General Services 

Administration (GSA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: GSA is issuing a final rule to 

modify provisions in the Federal 

Management Regulation (FMR) to 

improve readability and ease of use by 

reorganizing certain FMR parts to reflect 

the asset management life-cycle and by 

updating the definition of a ‘museum’. 

DATES: Effective: March 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

William Garrett, Program Director, 

Office of Government-wide Policy, at 

202–368–8163, for clarification of 

content. For information pertaining to 

status or publication schedules, contact 

the Regulatory Secretariat at 202–501– 

4755. Please cite FMR Case 2018–102– 

6. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

This final rule amends the FMR to 

improve readability and ease of use. 

Specifically, it reorganizes certain FMR 

parts to reflect the asset management 

life-cycle and updates the definition of 

a ‘museum’. 

GSA sought public comments on 

improving FMR regulations through a 

Federal Register document (MA–2017– 

03) published on May 30, 2017, at 82 FR 

24651. Concurrently, GSA sought 

comments and recommendations from 

agencies, GSA subject matter experts, 

and other stakeholders and customers. 

The two substantive/germane 

comments and recommendations 

elicited from the Federal Register 

document were reviewed by GSA and 

are addressed in this rule. Two other 

recommendations addressing (1) agency 

asset management systems and (2) use 

of voluntary consensus standards were 

not included in this rule as GSA does 

not have the legal authority to 

promulgate regulations addressing 

property in use by an agency before it 

is reported to GSA as excess personal 

property. 

Provisions in this final rule make the 

FMR policies addressing personal 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 23 / Thursday, February 3, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 6043 

property management more 

understandable and easier to read. This 

final rule addresses the following: 

1. An amendment to FMR section 

102–35.10, listing FMR parts related to 

personal property disposal in sequence 

so that the listing of FMR parts follows 

the general life-cycle processes related 

to asset management and disposal; and 

2. Revisions to the regulations 

governing the donation program to 

incorporate legislation regarding 

museums (Pub. L. 114–287, Section 23) 

to ensure consistency with Federal law. 

The donation program allows for the 

transfer of Federal surplus personal 

property to state agencies for surplus 

property for distribution to eligible 

recipients within their state. 

II. Discussion of the Final Rule 

A. Summary of Significant Changes 

GSA is modifying provisions in the 

FMR to improve readability and ease of 

use. 

B. Analysis of Public Comments 

The proposed rule was published in 

the Federal Register on June 9, 2020 (85 

FR 35236). Four comments were 

received, two of which were 

substantive/germane to the rule. An 

analysis of these public comments 

follows: 

Comment: One respondent indicated 

that the proposed rule ‘‘is bad for the 

environment and public safety’’ and 

should not be implemented. 

Response: These changes do not 

involve environmental concerns or 

public safety. 

Comment: One respondent objected to 

‘‘eliminating all definition references in 

this proposed rule’’ and that it is 

important to have definitions repeated 

in each area that are critical for 

understanding the requirements. 

Response: Concur. The consolidation 

of duplicative occurrences of definitions 

has been removed from this final rule. 

C. Expected Cost Impact to the Public 

There is no expected cost to the 

public from this rule, as this rule is 

largely administrative. The changes will 

result in a better user experience with 

the FMR, as the information will be 

organized in a more logical order. 

III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 

13563 direct agencies to assess all costs 

and benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the 

importance of quantifying both costs 

and benefits, of reducing costs, of 

harmonizing rules, and of promoting 

flexibility. This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action, and therefore, was not 

subject to review under Section 6(b) of 

E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and 

Review, dated September 30, 1993. 

IV. Congressional Review Act 

This rule is not a major rule under 5 

U.S.C. 804(2). Additionally, this rule is 

excepted from Congressional Review 

Act reporting requirements prescribed 

under 5 U.S.C. 801 since it relates to 

agency management or personnel. 

V. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

This final rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

within the meaning of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. This 

final rule is also exempt from the 

Administrative Procedures Act per 5 

U.S.C. 553(a)(2) because it applies to 

agency management or personnel. 

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act 

The Paperwork Reduction Act does 

not apply because the changes to the 

FMR do not impose recordkeeping or 

information collection requirements, or 

the collection of information from 

offerors, contractors, or members of the 

public that require the approval of the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. 

List of Subjects in 41 CFR Parts 102–35 

and 102–37 

Government property management. 

Robin Carnahan, 

Administrator of General Services. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, GSA amends 41 CFR parts 

102–35 and 102–37 as set forth below: 

PART 102–35—DISPOSITION OF 

PERSONAL PROPERTY 

■ 1. The authority for part 102–35 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c). 

■ 2. Amend § 102–35.10 by revising 

paragraphs (e) thru (g) to read as 

follows: 

§ 102–35.10 How are these regulations for 

the disposal of personal property 

organized? 

* * * * * 

(e) Utilization and disposition of 

personal property with special handling 

requirements (part 102–40 of this 

subchapter B). 

(f) Disposition of seized, forfeited, 

voluntarily abandoned, and unclaimed 

personal property (part 102–41 of this 

subchapter B). 

(g) Utilization, donation, and disposal 

of foreign gifts and decorations (part 

102–42 of this subchapter B). 

PART 102–37—DONATION OF 

SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY 

■ 3. The authority for part 102–37 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 40 U.S.C. 549 and 121(c). 

■ 4. Amend appendix C to part 102–37 

by revising the definition of ‘‘Museum’’ 

to read as follows: 

Appendix C to Part 102–37—Glossary 

of Terms for Determining Eligibility of 

Public Agencies and Nonprofit 

Organizations 

* * * * * 

Museum means a public agency or 

nonprofit educational or public health 

institution that is organized on a permanent 

basis for essentially educational or aesthetic 

purposes and which, using a professional 

staff, owns or uses tangible objects, either 

animate or inanimate; and cares for these 

objects. A museum is considered to be 

attended by the public if the museum, at 

minimum, accedes to any request submitted 

for access during business hours. For the 

purposes of this definition, a museum uses 

a professional staff if it employs at least one 

full-time staff member or the equivalent, 

whether paid or unpaid, primarily engaged in 

the acquisition, care, or public exhibition of 

objects owned or used by the museum. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02167 Filed 2–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–14–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 21–125; RM–11892; DA 22– 

91; FR ID 70015] 

Television Broadcasting Services 

Hazard, Kentucky 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: On September 22, 2021, the 

Media Bureau, Video Division (Bureau) 

issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

(NPRM) in response to a petition for 

rulemaking filed by Gray Television 

Licensee, LLC (Petitioner), the licensee 

of WYMT, channel 12, Hazard, 

Kentucky, requesting the substitution of 

channel 20 for channel 12 at Hazard in 

the Table of Allotments. For the reasons 

set forth in the Report and Order 

referenced below, the Bureau amends 

Federal Communications Commission 

(FCC) regulations to substitute channel 

20 for channel 12 at Hazard. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES