alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      12,278,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,759,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                   112,528
<INVENTORY>                                  3,005,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,567,166
<PP&E>                                      13,448,226
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,470,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,662,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,476,351
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       157,646
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,784,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,662,244
<SALES>                                     41,145,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,145,876
<CGS>                                       20,403,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,403,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,859,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,410,568
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,256,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,154,568
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,154,568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GUSTABO GONZALEZ
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 4800

[ July 6, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael Rothschild , Judge; L.T. Case No.

13002140CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant Attorney Gener al, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, M AY and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 99


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Applied Innovation Inc.:


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Applied
Innovation Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1999. In
connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have
also audited the financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying
accounts. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Applied Innovation
Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Columbus, Ohio
February 9, 2000
EXHIBIT F 

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 237-8 Filed: 03/02/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 19794
Election Results Voting Age Populations 

10 Governor I 10 Att. General I 08 President I 06 Att. General I 06 Auditor I 04 President 

D White I Hispanic I Black I Asian I Amlndian istrict Kasich I Strickland I DeWine I Cordray I McCain I Obama I Mont. I Dann I Taylor I Sykes I Bush T Kerry PVI 

8 ·Boehner 58.84% I 37.04% I 59.17% I 34.32% I 57.65% I 4o.8o% I 56.07% I 43 .93% 1 59.49% I 40.5 2% 1 61.45% I 38.13% R+ll 86.07% l 2.24% 1 9.79% l 1.73% l 0.2 1% 

County Population % of District 

Butler 368,130 51.06% 

Preble 42,270 5.86% 

Montgomery 144,540 20.05% 

Miami 102,506 14.22% 

Darke 52,959 7.34% 

Mercer 10,626 1.47% 

Total 721,031 

EXHIBIT 

REV _00000030 

Plaintiffs' Trial

Exhibit

P603

Case No. 1:18-cv-00357

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 237-8 Filed: 03/02/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 19795
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          15,441
<SECURITIES>                                    36,401
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,461
<PP&E>                                          18,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,638)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,889
<BONDS>                                         12,852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       226,330
<OTHER-SE>                                   (185,214)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,224
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,132)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,132)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,132)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm*. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than March 2, 2022.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas*                     (Karen Smith, Director, Applications) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

                    1.                     *CBTX, Inc., Beaumont, Texas;*                     to merge with Allegiance Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Allegiance Bank, both of Houston, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 26, 2022.

Margaret McCloskey Shanks,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-01920 Filed 1-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# DI9910 TRAVEL SERVICE (U.S.A.), INC. 

# + We Service the World.

The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: ::..rl On behalfofNissin Travel Services, I am writing to express our strong support _,c-

____**~~f(}!JlIe~l'lic!ltio!LO~Air 1iIle§JorIl~F** **nOJJ.§l()j>~~ice Q~tw~en**  Detroit and Haneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for ourregion, where many corporations havecstrong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and it's market. The growth ofourbusiness ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Ourbusiness travelers look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo'S downtown Haneda airport. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit ourbusiness travelers. Thank you for consideration ofthis request.
Nissin Travel Service (U.S.A.) Inc. Yasuo Kame6ka



# tl)

.

# ./~c~**~ager** Birmingham Branch

3000 RIVERCHASE GALLERIA-SUITE 790· BIRMINGHAM, AL 352M-TELEPHONE: (205) 739-0056' FAX: (205) 739-0054' 1-877-584-3939
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 1 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. DEUTCH (for himself, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. RASKIN, and Mr. KATKO) 

submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 1 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. To advance democratic self-government 

3 and political equality, and to protect the integrity of gov4 ernment and the electoral process, Congress and the 

5 States may regulate and set reasonable limits on the rais6 ing and spending of money by candidates and others to 

7 influence elections. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress and the States shall have 

9 power to implement and enforce this article by appropriate 

10 legislation, and may distinguish between natural persons 

11 and corporations or other artificial entities created by law, 

12 including by prohibiting such entities from spending 

13 money to influence elections. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. Nothing in this article shall be con15 strued to grant Congress or the States the power to 

16 abridge the freedom of the press.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Enigma Software Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alvin
      Estevez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Alvin
      Estevez





Chief
      Executive Officer


March
      28,
      2008
Brandon RAMSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5327

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5358

_____________________________

MARK PALETTI and TIM PALETTI,

Appellants,

v.

KEARNS HOLDINGS, LLC and

DANE GILBERT,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County.

Jennifer Johnson, Judge.

April 8, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Mark Paletti and Tim Paletti, pro se, Appellants.

Timothy Franklin of Franklin Legal, PL, Atlantic Beach, for 

Appellees.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JODY LYNN MORRIS

,

Appellant,

v.

T HE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 249

- CR

Appeal from the

384 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20140D02665 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until November 27 , 201 5

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Genesis Stephens , Court Reporter for the 384 th District Court

,

for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record for the above styled and numbered

cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before November 27

, 201 5

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 7 th day of October, 2015

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
## Reallocation of Slots at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and LaGuardia Airport



# FINAL (with Bidder ID Assignments) 12/2/2011 10:08 AM

Updated as of :5:00 PM 22-Nov-2011



### BIDDER BID AMOUNT WHEN BID PLACED 0 $0.00 0900 14-Nov-2011 JetBlue Airlines $1.00 12:04 PM 22-Nov-2011 Southwest Airlines $2.00 2:06 PM 22-Nov-2011 Allegiant Air $5,000,000.00 3:30 PM 22-Nov-2011 Frontier Airlines $10.00 3:54 PM 22-Nov-2011 Sun Country Airlines $80,000.00 4:07 PM 22-Nov-2011 WestJet Airlines $17,600,001.00 4:11 PM 22-Nov-2011 JetBlue Airlines $32,000,050.01 4:17 PM 22-Nov-2011 Southwest Airlines $13,040,224.00 4:19 PM 22-Nov-2011 Sun Country Airlines $800,000.00 4:32 PM 22-Nov-2011 Spirit Airlines $2,250,009.00 4:37 PM 22-Nov-2011 

# LGA BUNDLE B BIDS
EXHIBIT
10.11

    


    DIRECTOR
FEE ARRANGEMENTS FOR 2009


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    Exhibit
10.11

     

    Director
Fee Arrangements for 2009

     

    Each
director of MutualFirst
Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) also is a director of MutualBank (the
“Bank”).  For 2008, each non-employee director receives an annual fee
of $27,750 for serving on the Bank’s Board of Directors.  In addition
to this annual fee, Wilbur R. Davis receives a $6,000 annual fee for serving as
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Bank, Linn Crull receives a $5,000
annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee, Jerry McVicker
receives a $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Compensation
Committee and Jon Kintner receives $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of
the Trust Management Committee.  Directors are not compensated for
their service on the Company’s Board of Directors.

     

    The Bank
maintains deferred compensation arrangements with some directors which allows
them to defer all or a portion of their Board fees and receive income when they
are no longer active directors.  Deferred amounts earn interest at the
rate of 10 percent per year.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan B. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(i) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Trust at the end of, and for the period covered by the Report.



/s/ Alan B. MillerPresident and Chief Executive Officer March 12, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Yvonne S. DUKE, Executrix of the Estate of Amanda Smith, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17794.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Oct. 27, 1964.

Decided Nov. 5, 1964.

Mr. Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Mr. George F. Lynch, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. Louis F. Oberdorfer and Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., and Alec A. Pan-daleon, Atty., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for appellee.

Mr. John B. Jones, Jr., First Asst., Dept, of Justice, also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before Wilbur K. Miller, Senior Circuit Judge, and Danaher and McGowan, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves a challenge to the enforcement of a tax lien sought to be asserted by the United States against the cash surrender values of two insurance policies upon the life of the taxpayer. That such values may be a property interest to which tax liens can attach is settled by United States v. Bess, 357 U.S. 51, 78 S.Ct. 1054, 2 L.Ed.2d 1135 (1958). A separate question is that of whether, on the facts of a particular case, they are property “belonging to” the taxpayer within the meaning of Section 3670 of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. See United States v. Burgo, 175 F.2d 196 (3d Cir. 1949). It is this latter question which was raised, both in the District Court and on this appeal, at the instance of the taxpayer’s wife who claimed to have paid all of the premiums on one policy and a substantial portion of those on the other, and who. assertedly had physical possession of the policies.

The record as it comes to us is not too well adapted to the resolution of this issue. However, as the Third Circuit in *Burgo*held that on the record before it it could' not regard as “clearly erroneous” the District Court’s determination that the taxpayer had no property iri the cash surrender values of insurance policies on his life, so do we hold here that on this record we have no warrant to disturb the District Court’s conclusion that the values involved here did “belong to” the taxpayer.

Affirmed.