alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lawrence M. Higby, Chief Executive Officer of the company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ LAWRENCE M. HIGBY Lawrence M. Higby
Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the Securities and Exhange Commission
or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

RICO ISAIH HAIRSTON, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 Civil Action 2:18-cv-951 

 v. Judge James L. Graham 

 Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura 

NELSON EMEAGHARA, 

 

 Defendant. 

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

 Plaintiff, Rico Isaih Hairston, an Ohio inmate proceeding without the assistance of 

counsel, has filed a Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (In Forma Pauperis). (ECF 

No. 1.) His request is not accompanied by sufficient information to allow the Court to determine 

what filing fee to assess. Specifically, Plaintiff’s application is not accompanied by a certified 

trust fund statement from his prison’s cashier. 

To satisfy statutory requirements, Plaintiff must “submit a certified copy of the trust fund 

account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period 

immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal, obtained from the 

appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined.” 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(a)(2) (emphasis added). Further, Plaintiff is required to pay the full amount of the filing 

fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). That amount is to be collected through an initial assessment of 20 

percent of the greater of the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or the average 

monthly balance in the account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the 

complaint, and through monthly payments to be made thereafter in the amount of 20 percent of 
2 

the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. 

 Plaintiff has not submitted the required information. Specifically, Plaintiff’s Motion is 

not accompanied by the statutorily-required certified copy of a trust fund account statement. If 

Plaintiff intends to pursue this action, he is DIRECTED to submit, within 30 days of the date 

of this order, the required trust fund statement from his prison’s cashier. The trust fund 

statement should indicate both the average monthly balance in Plaintiff’s account for the last six 

months and the amount of income credited to his account during those months. Upon receipt of 

this information, the will Court determine whether Plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis, and, 

if so, will calculate the initial partial filing fee and the monthly installments, issuing a separate 

order directing payment. If Plaintiff fails to submit the requisite trust fund statement within 30 

days, the Court will assume that Plaintiff has decided not to pursue this case, and his request for 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied. 

 Plaintiff is advised that, if he opts to proceed with this litigation, his action may be 

subject to dismissal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff is further advised that if 

he proceeds and the case is dismissed under § 1915(e)(2), he will be assessed the full amount of 

the filing fee. See In re Prison Litigation Reform Act, 105 F.3d 1131, 1132 (6th Cir. 1997). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Chelsey M. Vascura 

CHELSEY M. VASCURA 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40369 Conference Calendar

TERRY LEE SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus WARDEN CHILDRESS, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CV-12

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Terry Lee Scott, federal prisoner # 62305-079, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and crack cocaine. Scott argues under United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment because it was enhanced based upon facts found by a judge. The decision in Booker does not apply retroactively to cases on collateralNo. 06-40369 -2- review, and a Booker claim does not satisfy the test for filing a § 2241 petition under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Padilla v. United States , 416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 2005). For the first time on appeal, Scott raises a factual challenge to the district court’s application of a four-level enhancement for his being a leader or organizer of the criminal activity. This newly raised factual claim is not reviewable for the first time on appeal. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder
Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4811]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Public Availability of Department of Energy FY 2011 Service 
Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of FY 2011 Service Contract 
Inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the 
Department of Energy (DOE) is publishing this notice to advise the 
public of the availability of the FY 2011 Service Contract inventory. 
This inventory provides information on service contract actions over 
$25,000 that were made in FY 2011. The information is organized by 
function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout 
the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance with 
guidance issued on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and 
Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance 
is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf. On 
December 19, 2011, OFPP issued additional guidance available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventory-guidance.pdf.
    Except for minor changes to reporting deadlines, the guidance for 
preparing and analyzing FY 2011 inventories is essentially unchanged 
from OFPP's November 5, 2010 guidance for preparing the FY 2010 
inventory. DOE has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory 
at: http://energy.gov/management/downloads/service-contract-inventory.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Jeff Davis in the Strategic 
Programs Division at 202-287-1877 or jeff.davis@hq.doe.gov.

    Dated: February 13, 2012.
Paul Bosco,
Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management.
[FR Doc. 2012-4811 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1002 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1002

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-one

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Controlled Substances Act to authorize the debarment of 
              certain registrants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Debarment Enforcement of Bad Actor 
Registrants Act of 2021'' or the ``DEBAR Act of 2021''.
SEC. 2. DEBARMENT OF CERTAIN REGISTRANTS.
    Section 304 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 824) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) The Attorney General may issue an order to prohibit, 
conditionally or unconditionally, and permanently or for such period as 
the Attorney General may determine, any person from being registered 
under this title to manufacture, distribute, or dispense a controlled 
substance or a list I chemical, if the Attorney General finds that--
        ``(1) such person meets or has met any of the conditions for 
    suspension or revocation of registration under subsection (a); and
        ``(2) such person has a history of prior suspensions or 
    revocations of registration.''.
SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.
    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Souhail Steve KMED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-295

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 23, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/13/2011 06:13 PM 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule 

Hi, 

Attached is the handout from this meeting. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

When: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:30 PM-2:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time 

(US & Canada). 

Where: Room 9104 NEOB 

 

 

This meeting was requested by Janet Anderson, Van Ness Feldman.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                           238
<INVENTORY>                                          9,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    18,588
<PP&E>                                              50,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                      16,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      73,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               14,465
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                50
<OTHER-SE>                                          29,318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        73,873
<SALES>                                             37,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    37,947
<CGS>                                               32,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       32,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (1,047)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.37)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR MICHAEL ANTHONY JEWELERS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                          10,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,404
<INVENTORY>                                     18,903
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,387
<PP&E>                                          38,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,345
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,749
<SALES>                                        150,629
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,629
<CGS>                                          124,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   170
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,568
<INCOME-TAX>                                       778
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,790
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. Such quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: February 17, 2009

By: /s/ James A. Joyce
    -----------------------
    James A. Joyce
    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# USS Roosevelt Transits Strait of Gibraltar

## From  U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa Public Affairs 

Roosevelt is one of four U.S. Navy destroyers based in Rota, Spain, and assigned to Commander, Task Force 65. These FDNF-E ships have the flexibility to operate throughout the waters of Europe and Africa, from the Cape of Good Hope to the Arctic Circle, demonstrating their mastery of the maritime domain.Headquartered in Naples, Italy, NAVEUR-NAVAF operates U.S. naval forces in the U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) and U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) areas of responsibility. U.S. Sixth Fleet is permanently assigned to NAVEUR-NAVAF, and employs maritime forces through the full spectrum of joint and naval operations.For more than 80 years, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-U.S. Naval Forces Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) has forged strategic relationships with our Allies and partners, leveraging a foundation of shared values to preserve security and stability.
Burden Estimate: Generic Information Collection for Testing, Pilots, and Focus Groups

Name of collection Type of Collection # of 

Respondents

Frequency per 

Response

Time per Response Total Time

Methodological 

Testing or Other 

Pretesting

Pretesting and 

development for 

up to 5 studies 

per year

250 

(5 tests x 50 

respondents)

annual 30 minutes per 

response

7500 minutes

Focus Groups Up to 5 groups 

per year to 

explore program 

issues

50 

(10 per focus 

group)

annual 60 minutes per focus 

group

300 minutes per 

group

60 minutes per 

individual in a focus 

group
State ofWisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 101 S. Webster Street Box 7921 Madison WI 53707-7921

March 16,2012 GeorgeCzerniak Acting Division Director Air & Radiation Division 77 W. Jackson Blvd (A-183) Chicago IL 60604 Scott Walker, Governor Cathy Stepp, Secretary

Telephone 608-266-2621 Toll Free 1-888-936-7463 TTYAccess via relay· 711 WISCONSIN DEPT. OFNATURALRESOURCES

Subject: Wisconsin State Implementation Plan Submittal for Greenhouse Gases Dear Mr. Czerniak: On May 4, 20II Wisconsin DNR submitted a request to US EPA Region V to revise its State Implementation Plan (S[P) to include new permit requirements relating to Greenhouse Gases. That submittal included pennanent rules to: • Define major source thresholds and significantemission increase levels; • Establish global wanning potential factors to be used to calculate emissions on an equivalent and comparable basis. In thatrequest, new permanentrules specific to implementing greenhouse gas requirements in Wisconsin's Title V permitting program were also present. It was neverWisconsin DNR's intention to have these rules included in its request to revise its S[P. With this letter Wisconsin DNR is requestingto withdraw the rules related to its Title V program from its requestto revise the SIP. Specifically, Wisconsin DNR withdraws the following rules from its May 4, 2011 request: • NR 407.02 (4) (b)(intro.) • NR407.02 (8m) • Table 3 ofNR407.05 • NR407.075 Questions regardingthis request can be directed to Andrew Stewartofmy staffat 608-266-6876 or andrew.stewart@wisconsin.gov . Sincerely,

# cjJJ-.~~~--- Bart Sponseller, Director Bureau ofAirManagement Cc: Pat Stevens-AD/8 Andrew Stewart-AMl7 Ralph Patterson-AMl7

dnr.wi.gov wisconsin.gov 

### Naturally

## WISCONSIN
Daniel A. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3131

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 26, 2018

Daniel A. Taylor, Indiantown, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  Certification
                       pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary C. Parks, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                            /s/ Gary C. Parks
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Gary C. Parks
                           Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
                           (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
                           November 9, 2005
Floyd Edward WILLIAMS Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.