alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Deborah S. Hunt 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

 Filed: September 13, 2019 

 

Mr. Richard W. Nagel 

Southern District of Ohio at Dayton 

200 W. Second Street 

Suite 712 Federal Building 

Dayton, OH 45402-0000 

 Re: Case No. 19-3196, William Schmitt, et al v. Frank LaRose

Originating Case No. : 2:18-cv-00966 

Dear Clerk: 

 Enclosed is a copy of the mandate filed in this case. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 

 

s/Amy E. Gigliotti 

Case Management Specialist 

Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012 

cc: Mr. Mark R. Brown 

 Mr. Stephen P. Carney 

 Mr. Benjamin Michael Flowers 

 Mr. Michael Jason Hendershot 

 Mr. Mark G. Kafantaris 

Enclosure 

 

Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 63 Filed: 09/13/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 498 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

 

________________ 

 No: 19-3196 

________________

 

 Filed: September 13, 2019 

WILLIAM T. SCHMITT; CHAD THOMPSON; DEBBIE BLEWITT 

 Plaintiffs - Appellees 

v. 

FRANK LAROSE, Ohio Secretary of State 

 Defendant - Appellant 

 

MANDATE 

 Pursuant to the court's disposition that was filed 08/07/2019 the mandate for this case hereby 

issues today. 

 

COSTS: None 

Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 63 Filed: 09/13/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 499
#### People v Edward Jackson,

Nos. 91055, 91056;

Court of Appeáls Nos. 118728, 117627.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
C. Hall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                   /S/ EDWARD C. HALL
                                   -------------------
                                   EDWARD C. HALL
                                   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   (PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER)

November 19, 2003
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Luciano, Chief Executive Officer of MPM Technologies,  Inc. and I,
Glen Hjort, Chief Financial Officer of MPM Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

    1.  The Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the annual period
        ended  December  31,  2007  (the  "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
        requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
        U.S.C. 78m); and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
        Company.

Dated: March 13, 2009        /s/ Michael J. Luciano      /s/ Glen Hjort
---------------------        ----------------------      --------------
                             Chief Executive Officer     Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-4.7







Exhibit 4.7




Consent of Peter Grieve




     I, Peter Grieve, hereby confirm that I have read the Notice of Meeting and Management
Information Circular of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. (“Aurora”) dated March 20, 2009 (the
“Circular”) relating to the special meeting of shareholders of Aurora to approve the amalgamation
of Aurora and 59801 Newfoundland & Labrador Inc., which Circular incorporates by reference the
annual information form of Fronteer Development Group Inc. (“Fronteer”) dated March 27, 2008 for
its year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the technical report dated March 30, 2007 entitled “Technical
Report on the Pirentepe and Halilaga Exploration Properties, Çanakkale, Western Anatolia, Turkey”
(the “Technical Report”) in the AIF or other documents incorporated by reference therein. I further
consent to the inclusion in the Circular and Fronteer’s registration statement on Form F-8 relating
to the Circular filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration
Statement”) of the Technical Report (through the inclusion by way of incorporation by reference of
the AIF in the Circular) and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Circular
and the Registration Statement or any documents incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Report and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Report contained in the Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Report
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Report.



	 	 	 	 	 
	March 20, 2009

	 	(signed) Peter Grieve
 

Peter Grieve, M.Sc., M.A.I.G.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            486,693 
<SECURITIES>                                    1,186,837 
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0 
<INVENTORY>                                        98,058 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,784,235 
<PP&E>                                            132,090 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     77,492 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,972,419 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             192,483 
<BONDS>                                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0 
<PREFERRED>                                             0 
<COMMON>                                           79,832 
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,700,104 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,779,936 
<SALES>                                           108,100 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  108,100 
<CGS>                                              56,285 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  734,915 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  121,702 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (776,515)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        4,839 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (781,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0 
<CHANGES>                                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     (781,354)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.11)
                                               


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-82,563-01 & WR-82,563-02

EX PARTE ARMANDO FERMIN SOTO, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W10-19502-(H)(A) & W10-19503-H(A)

IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted in two causes of

intoxicated manslaughter and sentenced to imprisonment for twenty years in each cause. The Fifth

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Soto v. State, Nos. 05-11-01061-CR & 05-11-01062-CR,

Tex. App.—Dallas Nov. 28, 2012) (not designated for publication). 

Applicant contends, among other things, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective

assistance because counsel erroneously advised him that, upon the appellate court’s decision on her
2

Anders motion to withdraw, he would have 30 days to review the record and file a pro-se brief. We

remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel erroneously advised him

about the procedure of filing a pro se brief. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. In

re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). 

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file a pro-se, out-of-time

responsive brief alerting the court of appeals to any matters he believes might be arguable in a brief

on the merits appealing the judgments of conviction in Cause Nos. F-1019503-H & F-1019502-H

from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County. The court of appeals shall make sure that

the Applicant is granted access to the appellate record within 15 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s filings shall be due within 45 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues. 

Delivered: June 10, 2015

Do not publish
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Diane K. Bryantt                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Diane K. Bryantt                                  |
|   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | July 14, 2011                                     |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY RERERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,345
<INVENTORY>                                     19,299
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,657
<PP&E>                                          70,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,692
<BONDS>                                         10,753
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,681
<SALES>                                        272,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,991
<CGS>                                          228,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (1,067)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,830
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,507
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (60)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.06


        

</TABLE>
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

9/27/19

 Southern District of Ohio

Aaron Stonerock

3:18-CV-296

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant; Case is remanded to the Commissioner under

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for reconsideration; case is terminated on Court's docket

✔ Thomas M. Rose

Report and Recommendations
# USS Carney (DDG 64) enters the Mediterranean Sea

### 6 Apr 2024

Carney entered the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations October 18, 2023, and conducted operations in support of maritime stability and security in defense of U.S., Allied, and partner interests. The ship's presence demonstrated the U.S. Navy's commitment, flexibility and capability to operate throughout the region.Headquartered in Naples, Italy, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-U.S. Naval Forces Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) operates U.S. naval forces in the U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) and U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) areas of responsibility. U.S. 6th Fleet is permanently assigned to NAVEUR-NAVAF, and employs maritime forces through the full spectrum of joint and naval operations.For more than 80 years, NAVEUR-NAVAF has forged strategic relationships with our Allies and partners, leveraging a foundation of shared values to preserve security and stability.
Jewel VAUGHN, III v. DIS-TRAN STEEL, LLC

NO. 2018-C-396

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 2018

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL, PARISH OF RAPIDES

Writ denied.

GENOVESE, Justice, dissents in part.

I agree with the majority's denial of this writ; however, I dissent only to the extent that I would award attorney fees to the plaintiff. In workers' compensation cases, an increase in attorney fees is *999awarded on appeal when the defendant appeals, obtains no relief, and the appeal has necessitated more work on the part of the plaintiff's attorney, provided that the plaintiff requests such an increase. *McKelvey v. City of Dequincy* , 07-604, pp. 11-12 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/14/07), 970 So.2d 682, 689 ; *Pitcher v. Hydro-Kem Services, Inc.* , 551 So.2d 736, 740 (La.App. 1 Cir.1989), *writ denied* , 553 So.2d 466 (La.1989). On appellate review, the plaintiff must answer the appeal to be awarded attorney fees; however, this matter is a writ application rather an appeal. There is no set procedure for seeking attorney fees when successfully defending against a writ filed in this Court. Here, the plaintiff, in his opposition to defendant's writ application before this Court, has sought attorney fees for work done in this matter and, in my view, should be awarded same. La. C.C.Pr. art. 2164.
Enrique Pena RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-251

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 123-6 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 123-6 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
cryoport_s8-ex1001.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

     

     

    
      	 
      	
              Carpe
      DM, Inc.

            
	
              1225
      Johnston Drive

            
	
              Watchung,
      NJ 07069

            
	
              Phone:
      908-490-0075

            
	
              fax:
      908-668-1286

            
	
              mail:
      stuart@carpedminc.com

            
	 
      


    

    


    


    October
1, 2007

    


    Mr. Peter
Berry

    Chief
Executive Officer

    Cryoport,
Inc.

    20382
Barents Sea Circle

    Lake
Forest, CA  92630

    


    Dear Mr.
Berry:

    


    This
letter represents acceptance of the terms of Agreement for services to be
conducted on Cryoport's behalf by Carpe DM, Inc. ("CDM") as discussed and
described in CDM'S proposal dated September 12, 2007.  A monthly retainer
fee will be paid commencing as of October 15, 2007. Invoices for services will
be delivered via email and a hard copy sent via regular post upon request by the
Cryoport.

    


    This
Agreement will take effect on October 15, 2007, and will remain in effect for 36
months. This Agreement is automatically renewable unless a cancellation notice
is sent within 30 days or more prior to the expiration of the Agreement. The
retainer fee is $7500 per month for IR services. For PR services the fee will be
150,000 shares of S-8 registered stock issued no later than 10 days from the
signing of this Agreement and 250,000 options with piggyback registration rights
with a strike price of S1.50 per share.  If these terms are acceptable to
Cryoport, please print two copies of this document, sign both copies where
indicated, fax a copy back for my records and then mail the two originally
signed documents to me. I will then originally sign them and return one to you
for your records. I look forward to working with you and the entire Cryoport
team.

    


    Best
regards,

    Carpe DM,
Inc.

     

    Stuart
Fine

    CEO

    


    
      	 
      	
              Agreed
      to and Accepted by:

            
	 
      	
              Cryoport,
      Inc.

            
	 	 
	 
      	
              /s/
      Peter Berry 

                
      

            
	 
      	
              Name:
      Peter Berry

            
	 
      	
              Title:
      CEO
Ronald WHEELER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida DEPT. OF HEALTH, BD. OF MEDICINE, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1661

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 2018

Stephen M. Slepin, of The Maddox Horne Law Firm, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Mari H. McCully, of the Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Makar, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
        2002**






In
      connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of New World Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Shehryar Wahid, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                September 24, 2008
            /s/
                Shehryar
                WahidShehryar
                WahidChief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Operations Officer(principal financial and principal accounting officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GARY ZUNIGA, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00333

- CR

Appeal from

207th District Court

of Hays County, Texas

(TC # CR

- 13

- 0328 )

O R D E R

The Court, on its own motion, finds it necessary to supplement the record. It is therefore

ORDERED that the District Clerk of Hays County, Texas prepare a supplemental clerk’s record

to include the following: a copy of any order assessing attorney’s fees against Appellant as costs

and forward same to this Court on or before December 1, 2017

.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 1 6 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.