alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**J-A16016-20 NON** **PRECEDENTIAL DECISION** **- SEE** **SUPERIOR COURT** **I.O.P. 65.37** **COMMONWEALTH OF** **PENNSYLVANIA IN** **THE SUPERIOR** **COURT OF** **PENNSYLVANIA V.** **TRAVIS LEE** **PLANK Appellant** **No. 1409** **MDA 2019** **Appeal from** **the Judgment** **of Sentence** **Entered July** **30, 2019** **In the** **Court of** **Common Pleas** **of Adams** **County Criminal** **Division at** **No(s): CP-01-CR-0001013-2018** **BEFORE: PANELLA,** **P.J., STABILE,** **J., and** **MUSMANNO, J.** **CONCURRING STATEMENT** **BY MUSMANNO,** **J.: FILED** **MARCH 26,** **2021 I** **agree with** **the Majority** **that, pursuant** **to Commonwealth** **v. Au,** **42 A.3d** **1002 (Pa.** **2012), the** **interaction between** **Travis Lee** **Plank ("Plank")** **and Pennsylvania** **State Trooper** **Matthew Hochberg** **("Trooper Hochberg")** **began as** **a mere** **encounter. However,** **I believe** **that the** **mere encounter** **escalated into** **an investigative** **detention. Nevertheless,** **because the** **investigative detention** **was supported** **by reasonable** **suspicion, I** **would conclude** **that the** **interaction between** **Plank and** **Trooper Hochberg** **was lawful.** **Thus, I** **concur with** **the result** **reached by** **the Majority.**
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kenneth Y. Tanji, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within such entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2008



/s/ Kenneth Y. TanjiKenneth Y. TanjiExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




21
Kurt NYSTROM, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Joyce Linda ABEL, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0655

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 29, 2017

**CORRECTED ORDER**

ORDERED that appellant's notice of voluntary dismissal of appeal is recognized by the Court, and this appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Florida is hereby dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1189 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1189

 To amend the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 to permit the construction of 
  deepwater ports in Federal water adjacent to certain coastal States 
      that do not have an active Coastal Zone Management Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

  Mr. Young introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 to permit the construction of 
  deepwater ports in Federal water adjacent to certain coastal States 
      that do not have an active Coastal Zone Management Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deepwater Port Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO DEEPWATER PORT ACT OF 1974.

    The Deepwater Port Act of 1974 is amended--
            (1) in section 4(c)(9) (33 U.S.C. 1503(c)(9)), by inserting 
        ``except for a State which developed an approved coastal zone 
        management program pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act 
        of 1972 and had withdrawn such plan prior to January 1, 2012'' 
        before ``the adjacent coastal State''; and
            (2) in section 9(c) (33 U.S.C. 1508(c)), by striking ``The 
        Secretary'' and inserting ``Except for a State which developed 
        an approved coastal zone management program pursuant to the 
        Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 and had withdrawn such plan 
        prior to January 1, 2012, the Secretary''.
                                 <all>
```
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 1, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22

- 1719 Lower Tribunal No. 21

- 25582

________________ 

### John Doe ,

Appellant,

vs. 

### Soothe , Inc., et al. , Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade C ounty, Vivianne Del Rio , Judge. Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC , and Morgan L. Weinstein (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant. Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. , and Thomas A. Valdez , Megan G. Colter and Chanelle Artiles (Tampa), for appellee Soothe , In c

.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and GORDO , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 Affirmed. See Medytox Sols., Inc. v. Investorshub. com, Inc. , 152 So. 3d 727, 730 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“ The plain language of section 230 [of the Communications Decency Act] ‘cr eates a federal immunity to any cause of action that would make service providers liable for information originating
with a third

- party user of the service.’” (quoting Zeran v. Am. Online, Inc. , 129 F.3d 327, 330 (4th Cir. 1997))); Doe v. Am. Online, Inc. , 783 So. 2d 1010, 1018 (Fla. 2001) ( “ We specifically concur that section 230 expressly
bars ‘ any actions ’ and we are compelled to give the language of this preemptive law its plain meaning. ”); White v. Discovery Commc’ns, LLC , 365 So. 3d 379, 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023) (“ Section 230 clearly pree mpts Florida law.”) ; Steiner Transocean Ltd. v. Efremova , 109 So. 3d 871, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ( “[A] court is permitted to consider evidence outside the four corners of the complaint where the motion to dismiss challenges subject matter jurisdiction or p ersonal jurisdiction, or where the motion to dismiss is based upon forum non conveniens or improper venue.” ) (footnotes omitted); Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum , 912 So. 2d 561, 568 (Fla. 2005) (“ Florida courts, including this Court, have held that the issue o f federal preemption is a question of subject matter jurisdiction.” ); Hernandez v. Coopervision, Inc. , 661 So. 2d 33, 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) ( stating “the issue of federal preemption is a question of subject matter jurisdiction”) ; Doe v. Kik3 Interactive, In c. , 482 F. Supp. 3d 1242, 12 52 (S.D. Fla. 2020) ( “Futility justifies the denial of leave to amend where the complaint, as amended, would still be subject to dismissal.” (citing Burger King Corp. v. Weaver , 169 F.3d 1310, 1320 (11th Cir. 1999))); Am. Online , Inc. , 783 So. 2d at 1013 (“[We] find that section 230 does preempt Florida law as to such a cause of
action based upon alleged negligence .”) (emphasis added) ; Medytox , 152 So. 3d at 730 (“ [T]he Florida Supreme Court held that section 230 preempts Florida law as to causes of action based in negligence against an Internet Service Provider as a distributor of information.” ) (emphasis added).
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AEC Annual Energy Consumption AEO Annual Energy Outlook ANOPR Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ANSI American National Standards Institute ASHRAE American Society of Hea ting, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers BOM bill of materials BT building technologies BTU British thermal units BVM beverage vending machine CBEC Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey CEC compressor energy consumption CFC chlorofluorocarbons CFR Code of Federal Regulations COGS cost of goods sold CRE commercial refrigeration equipment CRI color rendering index CMER consumer marginal energy rates CSL candidate standard level DAT discharge air temperature DC direct current DEC daily energy consumption DOE U.S. Department of Energy DOJ U.S. Department of Justice ECM electronically commutated motors EER energy efficiency ratio EHD electro-hydrodynamic EIA Energy Information Administration EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPACT 1992 Energy Policy Act of 1992 EPACT 2005 Energy Policy Act of 2005 EPCA Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 °F degrees Fahrenheit FTC U.S. Federal Trade Commission GRIM Government Regulatory Impact Model HCFC hydrocholorofluorcarbon HFC hydrofluorocarbon INC incremental cost ImSET Impact of Sector Energy Technologies kWh kilowatt hours LCC life-cycle cost LED light emitting diode Low-E low-emissivity LSHX liquid-suction heat exchangers

AA-iMPC manufacturing production cost MIA manufacturer impact analysis MLP manufacturer list price MPC manufacturer production cost MSP manufacturer selling price NAICS North American Indus try Classification System NEMS National Energy Modeling System NES national energy savings NIA national impact analysis NPV net present value NOPR Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ODP ozone depletion potential PBP payback period PPI producer price indices PSI pounds per square inch PSC permanent split capacitor R&D research and development RTTC Refrigeration and Thermal Test Center RIA regulatory impact analysis SBA U.S. Small Business Administration SCT saturated condenser temperature SEC U.S. Securities Exchange Commission SET saturated evaporator temperature SPM shaded-pole motors TSD Technical Support Document TSL trial standard level USC United States Code W watt WACC weighted-average cost of capital

AA-ii
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01679]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IN17-4-000]


Rover Pipeline, LLC; Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.; Updated 
Notice of Designation of Commission Staff as Non-Decisional

    With respect to an order issued by the Commission on December 16, 
2021, in the above-captioned docket, with the exceptions noted below, 
the staff of the Office of Enforcement are designated as non-decisional 
in deliberations by the Commission in this docket.\1\ Accordingly, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2202 (2021), they will not serve as advisors to 
the Commission or take part in the Commission's review of any offer of 
settlement. Likewise, as non-decisional staff, pursuant to 18 CFR 
385.2201 (2021), they are prohibited from communicating with advisory 
staff concerning any deliberations in this docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Rover Pipeline, LLC and Energy Transfer Partners, L.P., 177 
FERC ] 61,182 (2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Exceptions to this designation as non-decisional are:

Serrita Hill
Seema K. Jain
Grace Kwon
Gabriel Sterling


    Dated: January 21, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01679 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                           STATER BROS. HOLDINGS INC.
                    CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)
          (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              13 Weeks Ended
                                                          ------------------------
                                                          Dec. 27,         Dec. 26,
                                                           1998             1999
                                                          -------          -------
<S>                                                       <C>              <C>
Net income .....................................          $ 2,287          $ 1,852
Less preferred dividends .......................                -                -
                                                          -------          -------

Net income available to common shareholders ....          $ 2,287          $ 1,852
                                                          =======          =======

Earnings per common share ......................          $ 45.74          $ 37.04
                                                          =======          =======

Average common shares outstanding ..............           50,000           50,000
                                                          =======          =======

Common shares outstanding at end of period .....           50,000           50,000
                                                          =======          =======
</TABLE>



                                       18
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned, Edgar O. Huber, President and Chief
Operating Officer of Lands End, Inc. (the Company) and Michael P. Rosera, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014 (the Report).

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 25, 2014                                                     
|                                                                   
|/s/ Edgar O. Huber                                                 
|Edgar O. Huber                                                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Michael P. Rosera

Michael P. Rosera

Executive Vice
President, Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial

Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)
[Universal Health Realty Income Trust letterhead]

                                 January 7, 2000


Mr. Alan B. Miller
President
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
367 South Gulph Road
King of Prussia, PA  19406

Dear Alan:

         The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust at their
December 1, 1999, meeting authorized the renewal of the current Advisory
Agreement between the Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. ("Agreement") upon the
same terms and conditions.

         This letter constitutes the Trust's offer to renew the Agreement until
December 31, 2000, upon the same terms and conditions. Please acknowledge UHS of
Delaware, Inc.'s acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below
and returning one copy of this letter to me.

                                Sincerely yours,


                                /s/ Kirk E. Gorman
                                 Kirk E. Gorman
                                 President and Secretary



cc:  Warren J. Nimetz, Esq.
       Charles Boyle

Agreed to and Accepted:



UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.

By: /s/ Alan B. Miller
      Alan B. Miller, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,272,708
<SECURITIES>                                 1,557,222
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,462,832
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,748,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,610,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,748,574
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,297
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               237,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,423,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,423,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,423,786)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (38.31)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (38.31)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NET INCOME (LOSS) PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,263
<SECURITIES>                                    29,597
<RECEIVABLES>                                      474
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,046
<PP&E>                                           5,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,242
<BONDS>                                         10,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,204
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,609)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,609)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.37)


</TABLE>
Ryan E. BUTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-75 2D17-85 2D17-250

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018

Guillermo E. Gomez, Jr., of Gomez & Touger, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jason M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.