Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices 5793 

6See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

7See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 8See Order. 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

shall determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review.6 In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1), Commerce calculated an 

importer-specific ad valorem 

antidumping assessment rate for POSCO 

that is not zero or de minimis, and will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by POSCO for which it did 

not know that the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.7

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for POSCO is 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this review; (2) for previously 

investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter was not 

covered in this review or the 

investigation, but the producer was 

covered, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established in the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of subject merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 41.10 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the original less-than-fairvalue investigation.8 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 27, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Change Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of Issues 

Comment 1: Whether a Constructed Export 

Price (CEP) Offset is Warranted 

Comment 2: Whether the POR is the 

Correct Reporting Period for Cost of 

Production 

Comment 3: Whether Cost Adjustments for 

Purchases of Inputs from Affiliated 

Suppliers are Warranted 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Exclude Four Items from POSCO’s 

General and Administrative Expenses 

(G&A) Ratio 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02140 Filed 2–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–979] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 

2019; Correction 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) published a notice in the 

Federal Register of October 25, 2021, in 

which Commerce announced the final 

results of the 2018–2019 administrative 

review of the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on certain crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

assembled into modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China (China). This 

notice inadvertently omitted Wuxi 

Suntech Power Co., Ltd/Luoyang 

Suntech Power Co., Ltd. from the list of 

companies with no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the period of review (POR). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of October 25, 

2021, in FR Doc 2021– 23181, on page 

58872, in the first column, correct the 

sentence under the caption ‘‘Final 

Determination of No Shipments’’ by 

replacing the portion of the sentence 

after the last semicolon, which currently 

reads: ‘‘and (3) Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd’’ 

with ‘‘(3) Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd.; and 

(4) Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd/ 

Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd.’’ 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
5794 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019, 

86 FR 58871 (October 25, 2021). 

2See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review, 

and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 

2018–2019, 86 FR 21277 (April 22, 2021), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

at 5. 

3 Id. 

1See Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: 

Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 41813 (August 3, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 41814. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from 

Malaysia: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020,’’ dated November 22, 2021. 

4Commerce continues to treat affiliates Region 

International Co. Ltd. and Region System Sdn. Bhd. 

(collectively, Region) as a collapsed single entity for 

the final results of this review. See Preliminary 

Results PDM at 5–6. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the 2019–2020 Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain 

Steel Nails from Malaysia,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 6See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2–4. 

Background 

On October 25, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

final results of the 2018–2019 

administrative review of the AD order 

on certain crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

assembled into modules, from China.1

Commerce inadvertently omitted Wuxi 

Suntech Power Co., Ltd/Luoyang 

Suntech Power Co., Ltd. from the list of 

companies that did not ship subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR.2 We hereby notify the public 

that in the final results of 2018–2019 

administrative review of the AD order 

on certain crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

assembled into modules from China, 

Commerce continued to find that, 

during the POR, there were no entries of 

subject merchandise into the United 

States from, or exports or sales of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States by, Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd/ 

Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd.3

Therefore, Wuxi Suntech Power Co., 

Ltd/Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 

should be included in the list of 

companies that did not ship subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 27, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02106 Filed 2–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–557–816] 

Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that certain 

steel nails from Malaysia were not sold 

at less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR), July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable February 2, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Preston Cox, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5041. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 3, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

2019–2020 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain steel 

nails from Malaysia.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results.2 On November 22, 

2021, we extended the deadline for 

these final results until January 28, 

2022.3 This review covers one 

mandatory respondent: Region.4 The 

producers/exporters not selected for 

individual examination are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of the Administrative 

Review’’ section of this notice. For a 

complete description of the events that 

followed the Preliminary Results, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the scope of 

the order are certain steel nails from 

Malaysia. For a complete description of 

the scope of this administrative review, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties 

in this review are discussed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is made available 

to the public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of the 

topics included in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received from 

interested parties regarding our 

Preliminary Results, and for the reasons 

explained in the Issues and Decision 

memorandum, we made no changes to 

the margin calculation methodology 

used in the Preliminary Results; 

however, we have changed the margin 

for these final results of review, as 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rates for Non-Selected Respondents 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weighted 

average of the estimated weighted 

average dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1