alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Applied Innovation Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                  /s/ Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr.
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr., Chairman,
                                  President and Chief Executive
                                  Officer of Applied Innovation Inc.
                                  March 8, 2004

                      Applied Innovation Inc. | Form 10-K
Brandon Rachon BEACHEM, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM, O/B/O Heather Marie THOMAS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-651

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership I-D ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 26th day of March, 2004.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP I-D
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
| CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO |
|--------------------------------|

| 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| /s/      Robert H. Schottenstein           |   | Date:  February      25, 2009 |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Robert      H. Schottenstein               |   |                                    |
| Chairman,      Chief Executive Officer and |   |                                    |
| President                                  |   |                                    |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         21,569
<SECURITIES>                                   43,829
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,306
<PP&E>                                         18,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,698)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 93,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,495
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      225,237
<OTHER-SE>                                   (163,071)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   93,878
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               25,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,446)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10497

Summary Calendar

LARRY DENTON, on behalf of Sandin Denton, minor

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

MICHAEL J ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

2:04-CV-331

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Denton, on behalf of his minor son, Sandin Denton, seeks review of

the district court judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s

decision that Sandin Denton is not disabled and therefore not entitled to

Supplemental Security Income payments under Sections 1602 and 1614(a)(3)(C)

of the Social Security Act. After a review of the briefs, the record, and the

applicable law, we find no reversible error. Essentially for the reasons stated in

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 10, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10497

2

the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, which was adopted by

the district court, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Carlton B. PARRISH, Appellant, v. T.D. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 1D17-28

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2070

Lower Tribunal No. 2013-CP-001770-0001-XX

_____________________________

LAURA WOODARD,

Appellant, 

v.

KENNETH W. MAXFIELD,JR., as PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of the ESTATE OF 

KENNETH W. MAXFIELD,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County.

Lauren L. Brodie, Judge.

February 20, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOZNIAK, SMITH and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Amber Robinson and Ralph Strzalkowski, of Florida Rights Law Firm, St. 

Petersburg, for Appellant.

D. Keith Wickenden and William M. Pearson, of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A.,

Naples, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-21024

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES KEVIN ESMOND, also known as Tracy L. Eubanks,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-652-1

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for James Kevin Esmond has moved

for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Esmond

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 
No. 02-21024

-2-

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 39 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

that the Supreme Court be composed of not more than nine justices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2021 

Mr. GALLAGHER (for himself, Mr. JACOBS of New York, Mr. BROOKS, Mr. 

BUDD, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. BUCK, and Mr. ROUZER) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require that the Supreme Court be composed 

of not more than nine justices. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 39 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Supreme Court shall be composed 

3 of not more than nine justices. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to 

5 enforce this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# Navy Identifies Reserve Sailor Who Died of COVID-19 Related Complications

### 28 Jul 2021

Hillman, 47, of Boise, Idaho, was assigned to Navy Reserve Volunteer Training Unit, Boise, ID.“We are deeply saddened by the loss of our friend and shipmate MA1 Hillman.  He was a big part of our community here in Boise.  We will continue to support his family and shipmates during this difficult time.” Said Cmdr. Megan Fine, Commanding Officer of Navy Operational Support Center, Boise, ID.Anyone experiencing flu-like symptoms is encouraged to seek medical treatment immediately.For questions related to this release, please contact Commander, Navy Reserve Force Public Affairs.
Darious Lashun BRIGGS v. STATE

CR-15-0714

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CASE NO. 3:18 CR 104
Plaintiff, : JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
v.
SANDY GREEN,
Defendant.
AGREED ORDER

This matter comes before this Honorable Court upon the Government's request for

restitution on behalf of:

1, Jerry Berkemeyer (owner of Victim Business A as described in the Plea Agreement (R.
21), .

2. David L. Craynon (owner of Victim Business B as described in the Plea Agreement QR.
21)), and

3, River Valley Credit Union, 505 Earl Blvd., Miamisburg, Ohio 45342.

The Defendant Sandy Green plead guilty to a two-count Information charging her with

“Wire Fraud,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

The United States and the Defendant Sandy Green have agreed that the Court will impose

restitution for the offenses of conviction in this case. There is no dispute between the parties that
the Defendant Sandy Green is responsible for restitution for her offenses with regard to the three

above-listed victims, in that she unlawfully stole money belonging to these three victims.



IT IS THEREFORE AGREED by the parties that Defendant Sandy Green agrees to pay
$101,178.99 as restitution for victim Jerry Berkemeyer.

IT IS THEREFORE AGREED by the parties that Defendant Sandy Green agrees to pay
$70,150.08 as restitution for victim David L. Craynon.

IT IS THEREFORE AGREED by the parties that Defendant Sandy Green agrees to pay
$1,766.04 as restitution for victim River Valley Credit Union.

THUSLY, IT IS FURTHER AGREED by the parties that Defendant Sandy Green agrees
to pay a total restitution amount of $173,095.11.

Restitution shall be paid to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio. Specific payment details will be set forth in detail in the Judgment and
Commitment Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

L Pasae Gee
JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4-3-19
Date

REVIEWED AND AGREED TO BY:

BENJAMIN C. GLASSMAN
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

BIZB/ 2014
SaMbéHarden Date
Assistant United States Attorney

andy Date
Defendant

(An Slagiit
Christopher A. Deal, Esq. Date

Counsel for Defendant Sandy Green
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4630-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4630-DR), dated December 12, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued December 16, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of December 12, 2021.

Christian, Hart, Hickman, Logan, Lyon, and Ohio Counties for Individual Assistance.

Christian, Hart, Hickman, Logan, Lyon, and Ohio Counties for debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-02233 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
acrx20150930_10q.htm


Exhibit 4.7

 

 

 

 

WARRANT MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

 

This Warrant Modification Agreement is entered into as of September 17 2015, between Hercules Technology II, L.P. (the “Warrantholder”) and AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”). 

 

Recitals

 

A.           On December 16, 2013, the Company issued to Warrantholder a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase shares of its Common Stock on such terms as set forth therein. Any terms not specifically defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Warrant.

 

B.            In connection with an amendment to the Loan Agreement of even date herewith, the Company and the Warrantholder now desire to adjust the Exercise Price of the Warrant.

 

Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Warrantholder agree as follows:

 

 

 

1.             The term “Exercise Price” in the Warrant is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

“Exercise Price” means $3.88.

 

2.             Except as specifically set forth in this Warrant Modification Agreement, the Warrant remains unmodified and in full force and effect. 

 

 

***

 


 

 




 


 

Exhibit 4.7 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by its officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date set forth above.

 

 

	
COMPANY:
	
ACELRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	 	 	 
	
 
	
By:   /s/ Timothy E. Morris                                                                              
	
 

	 	 	 
	
 
	
Name:   Timothy E. Morris                                                                             
	
 

	 	 	 
	
 
	
Title:   Chief Financial Officer                                                                          
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	 	 	 
	
WARRANTHOLDER: 
	
HERCULES TECHNOLOGY II, L.P.
	
 

	
 
	
a Delaware limited partnership
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:  Hercules Technology SBIC Management, LLC,
	
 

	
 
	
 its General Partner
	
 

	
 
	
By:  Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc., 
	
 

	
 
	
 its Manager
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:  /s/ Ben Bang                                                                                             
	
 

	
 
	
Name:     Ben Bang
	
 

	
 
	
Title:       Associate General Counsel
	
 



 

 

 

 

 

[signature page]
Paul R. PRIMAVERA, Doc# U30887, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

Paul R. Primavera, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Jason Dewane GREEN v. STATE

CR-15-1308

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 99**

SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs

*PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS*

www.sealebeers.com

 

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

 

We consent to the use, in the statement onForm 10K of Oncologix Tech, Inc. of our report dated December 16, 2013 on our audit of the financial statements of Oncologix Tech,Inc as of August 31, 2013, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years endedAugust 31, 2013, and the reference to us under the caption “Experts”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

***/s/******Seale and Beers, CPAs***

Seale and Beers, CPAs

Las Vegas, Nevada

December 16, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**Seale and Beers, CPAs PCAOB &CPAB Registered Auditors**

**50S. Jones Blvd Suite 202 Las Vegas, NV 89107 Phone: (888)727-8251 Fax: (888)782-2351**
U.S

. Deportment of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration

March 20, 2012 

### Mr. Stanley 

### L. Bernstein President RACCA

- Regional Air Cargo Carriers Association 60 Clifford Road Plymouth, MA 02360 Re: Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air Carrier Operations Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Docket FAA-2010-0100 Dear 

### Mr. Bernstein: Thank you for the letter you posted 

### inDocketFAA-20 10-0100 about the above-referenced notice ofproposed rulemaking. We appreciate your interest in this proposal and your initiative 

### in taking part in the rulemaking process. In your letter you requested an extension ofthe 60-day comment period for an additional 60 days due to the complexity ofthe proposal and the potential effects on aviation businesses and pilot supply. We have considered your request for extension. While we understand the reasons for your request we do not believe an extension is necessary. Therefore, your request is denied for the following reasons. In 2010, the FAAestablished the First Officer Qualification Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) as a result ofcomments it received from the advanced notice ofproposed rulcmaking. The ARC provided an additional forum for the aviation industry to give extensive input on flight training and experience requirements for a first officer 

### in part 121 operations. The ARC members were also asked to consider the applicable requirements of the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of2010 

### inmaking their recommendations. The Act also mandated that by August 2, 2013, all pilots in part 121 operations have anATPcertificate and that the FAA issue a final rule modifying the requirements for the issuance ofan ATP certificate. To help ensure that we meetthis deadline, the FAA must receive comments to its proposed rule by April30, 2012

. However, as stated in Title 14 Code ofFederal Regulations 

### § 11.45, we will consider comments filed late ifit is possible to do so without incurring expense ordelay.Thank you again for your participation inthis rulemaking and welook forward to receiving your comments. Wc will place this letter inthe docket. Sincerely,

# ~~~~ Pamela Hamilton-Powell Director, Office ofRulemaking