alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial  Officer of Century Milestone S&T Co., Ltd., that, to his knowledge, the  Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year-ended December 31,  2001, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition  and results of operations.

| October 7, 2003 | /s/ Michael Harrop                      |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|
|            |                                         |
|            | Michael Harrop, Chief Financial Officer |

----
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 1 of 7

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 2 of 7

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 3 of 7

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 4 of 7

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 5 of 7

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 6 of 7

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 67-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
MARCH 31, 1997 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      13,966,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,985,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,801,095
<PP&E>                                      36,447,571
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,216,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,857,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,666,978
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,840
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,072,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,857,163
<SALES>                                      6,239,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,341,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,486,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             602,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,251,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                   490,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            761,768
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                181,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   580,768
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carmike Cinemas, Inc. (the
Corporation) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
of Directors of the Corporation, certifies that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

|                                       |  | 
|-------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Michael W. Patrick                 |  | 
|                                       |  | 
|Michael W. Patrick                     |  | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer     |  | 
|and Chairman of the Board of Directors |  | 
|March 25, 2003                         |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF CHEMTRAK
INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,641,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  429,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,409,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,000
<PP&E>                                       2,134,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,851,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,968,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,201,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,851,000
<SALES>                                        666,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,416,000
<CGS>                                        1,255,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,255,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,035,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                161,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            161,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   161,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Maxi Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mathew W. Evans, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Mathew W. Evans
---------------------
CEO and CFO
March 26, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SERGHEI VERLAN (2) 

AKHLIDDIN KALONOV (7), 

Defendants.

Case No. 1:18-cr-109

JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE

ORDER

This cause came before the Court for a Telephone Status Conference on June

19, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. before Judge Douglas R. Cole. The Government advised the 

Court that advised the Court that a plea agreement has been filed as to Defendant 

Kariaka, it is engaged in plea negotiations with Defendant Kalonov, and that 

Defendant Verlan appears to be headed to trial. Counsel for Defendant Verlan 

requested a 60-day continuance to further review discovery and meet with his client. 

Counsel for Defendant Kalanov joined in the motion. Change of Plea hearing for 

Defendant Kariaka set for June 22, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 822. Telephone 

Status Conference for Defendants Verlan and Kalanov set for August 17, 2021, at 

12:30 p.m. There were no objections to the speedy trial clock being tolled through the 

next status conference. 

Therefore, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the 

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendants in a speedy 

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 207 Filed: 06/18/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1194
2 

trial, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(i), as failure to grant the continuance 

would prevent Defendant Kalonov from exploring a possible resolution of the matter

and would prevent Defendant Verlan from reviewing the discovery and determining 

how to proceed, and thus would likely lead to a miscarriage of justice. Based on the 

foregoing, the Court GRANTS the continuance and also finds the period of time 

elapsing from June 18, 2021, until August 17, 2021, is properly, and shall be, excluded 

from the speedy trial calculation. 

SO ORDERED.

June 18, 2021

DATE DOUGLAS R. COLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 207 Filed: 06/18/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1195
Jimmy THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4218

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew Overpeck, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Robert S. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Olga J. WILLIAMS, Respondent.

No. 1D17-1166

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Universal HealthRealty Income Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles F. Boyle, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Trust, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust at the end of, and for the period covered by, the Report. 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
Exhibit 32

























CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Flanders Corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, we hereby certify, solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  February 20, 2006
      
      
      /s/Steven K. Clark
      
      Steven K. Clark
      President and Chief Executive Officer
      
      /s/John W. Hodson
      
      John W. Hodson
      Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-14952

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cr-00104-WS-B-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHANEY DARNELL THOMAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(May 28, 2019)

Before TJOFLAT, JILL PRYOR, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-14952 Date Filed: 05/28/2019 Page: 1 of 3 
2

The Government moves to dismiss this appeal by reason that Appellant 

Chaney Darnell Thomas has waived the right to pursue it. For the reasons 

described below, we grant the Government’s motion.

Thomas pleaded guilty to three counts of drug and firearm offenses. See 18 

U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); id. § 924(c)(1)(A); 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). As part of his plea 

agreement, he waived both the right to appeal his conviction or his sentence and 

the right to file a collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He reserved, however, 

his right to timely appeal (1) a sentence imposed in excess of the statutory 

maximum, (2) a sentence that upward departs from the sentence prescribed by the 

United States Sentencing Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), or (3) a sentence that 

varies from the sentence prescribed by the Guidelines, see 28 U.S.C. § 3553(a). 

He also reserved his right to claim ineffective assistance of counsel, see U.S. 

Const. amend. VI, via both direct appeal and collateral attack. And he reserved all

his rights to appeal should the Government itself choose to initiate an appeal. 

The Guidelines prescribed a range of 262 to 327 months, and the District 

Court imposed a sentence of 262 months. Thomas, through counsel, then filed a

timely appeal with this Court on the grounds that his sentence was substantively 

unreasonable. 

We enforce a waiver of a right to appeal a sentence so long as the waiver 

was made “knowingly and voluntarily.” United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 

Case: 18-14952 Date Filed: 05/28/2019 Page: 2 of 3 
3

1350 (11th Cir. 1993). To ensure this requirement is met, we usually require a 

district court that accepts a waiver to “specifically discuss[] the sentence appeal 

waiver with the defendant during the Rule 11 hearing.” Id. at 1351; see also Fed. 

R. Crim. P. 11(b) (outlining the procedural requirements for considering and 

accepting a defendant’s plea). The District Court did precisely that. 

The issue that Thomas raises on appeal—the substantive reasonableness of 

his sentence—is waived because his sentence of 262 months falls within the 

Guidelines range and does not exceed the statutory maximum. He does not 

challenge the effectiveness of his counsel. And the Government did not appeal 

Thomas’s sentence. As such, Thomas’s appeal is barred by the plain text of his 

waiver. 

The Government’s motion to dismiss Thomas’s appeal is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

Case: 18-14952 Date Filed: 05/28/2019 Page: 3 of 3
M.M.G. v. E.J.M.

2160054

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jermaine D. LOGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-692

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Served: December 2, 2014 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------

TEM ENTERPRISES, INC.

------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On November 20, 2014, TEM Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a XTRA Airways (“TEM”), a U.S. certificated air 

carrier,1 requested that the Department register the trade name “XTRAirways” for use in certain of its air 

transportation operations.

Part 215 of the Department’s regulations (14 CFR Part 215) provides that any air carrier wishing to use an 

alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states that the 

Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly named air carriers 

of the proposed use of the name. In this case, we identified that the trade name is a variation of TEM’s 

currently approved trade name “XTRA Airways”.

Since TEM has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of the trade 

name “XTRAirways” for immediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C., December 2, 2014.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov

 1 See Order 91-7-3 issued on July 3, 1991, most recently reissued by Order 2005-12-4 on December 9, 2005.
Attachment 

SERVICE LIST FOR TEM ENTERPRISES, INC.

MARK ATWOOD

COZEN O’ CONNOR

1627 I STREET

WASHINGTON DC 20006

JOSHUA WEINSHANK

DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS

TEM ENTERPRISES INC

805 WEST IDAHO

SUITE 400

BOISE ID 83702

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RITA/BTS E-34

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGER

FAA-AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

PETER LYNCH

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR

 ENFORCEMENT 

FAA/AGC – 300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

GORDON W KRAUS

POI FOR TEM ENTERPRISES INC
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Amin I. Khalifa, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ AMIN I. KHALIFA Amin I. Khalifa
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the Securities and Exhange Commission
or its staff upon request.
21ST CENTURY INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Constance GEHMAN and Lester Gehman, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882342
<NAME> 90CC
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         112,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,260
<PP&E>                                       5,791,073
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,974,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,022,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     998,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,022,403
<SALES>                                        414,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               418,341
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                217,787
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            217,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   217,787
<EPS-BASIC>                                      28.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>