alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                        -

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending February 1, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
W. Paolercio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         159(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




/s/: Michael W. Paolercio
Chief Executive Officer

February 1, 2003







<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending February 1, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allan
Corn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         159(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/: Allan Corn
Chief Financial Officer

February 1, 2003



                                     -17-
“Always	Ready,	Always	There,”	

Music	and	lyrics	by	Chief	Warrant	Officer 4 David	Myers,	40th Army	Band,	Vermont	Army	National	

Guard.	

We	are	the	Guard,

				Soldiers	and	Airmen	all	prepared.

We	are	the	National	Guard

				we	serve	on	land	and	in	the	air.

We	go	where	duty	calls

				around	the	world	and	here	at	home.

Stand	tall	in	the	National	Guard,

				Always	Ready,	Always	There!

We	represent	our	nation's	best,

				men	and	women	serving	true.

In	times	of	strife	or	nature's	wrath,

				the	Guard	will	always	see	us	through!

We	rise	across	the	U.S.A.

				from	sea	to	sea	our	land	so	fair.

We're	proud	of	the	National	Guard,

				Always	Ready,	Always	There!

We	serve	the	call	around	the	world,

				nation	to	nation	we	support.

As	friends	we	work	in	partnership

				to	train	or	fight	as	duty	calls.

While	here	at	home,	from	state	to	state

				community	service	we	prepare,

We	serve	in	the	National	Guard,

				Always	Ready,	Always	There!
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 51 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States giving 

Congress power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2021 

Mr. WOMACK (for himself, Mr. NEWHOUSE, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. BUDD, Mr. 

HARRIS, and Mr. CRAWFORD) submitted the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States giving Congress power to prohibit the physical 

desecration of the flag of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 51 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys3 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 40 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2021 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. BUDD, Mr. GOODEN of Texas, Mr. BUCK, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. 

GOHMERT, and Mr. HICE of Georgia) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require that the Supreme Court of the United 

States be composed of nine justices. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 40 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘The Supreme Court of the United States shall be 

3 composed of nine justices consisting of one chief justice 

4 and eight associate justices.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Case: 3:18-mj-00157-SLO Doc #: 5 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 39
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00824

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.C.P.T., A CHILD,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- PA

- 00127 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order in a suit for termination of the parent

- child relationship that must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. See T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Appellant timely filed his notice of appeal and request for a re porter’s record on November 20, 2019, and served a copy on the court reporter, Elva Chapa. Accordingly, the reporter’s record was due ten days later on November 30, 2019. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(b), 35.1(b). The record was not filed. On December 6, 2019, the reporter filed a notification of late record, requesting an extension of time until December 20, 2019 to file the record.

We grant the motion in part and order the record due December 16, 2019

. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (extension of time to file r ecord in accelerated appeal must not exceed 10 days).

Because this is an appeal from the termination of parental rights, “the trial court must direct the official or deputy reporter to immediately commence the preparation of the reporter’s
record. The tr ial court must arrange for a substitute reporter, if necessary.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(b)(1). We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court. See
T EX .R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (“[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly res ponsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed”).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 10th day of December, 2019

.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

CHARLENE ALLEN, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:18-cv-285 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

(by full consent of the parties) 

DECISION AND ENTRY 

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of 

Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 

2412. (Doc. #13). Specifically, the parties stipulate and petition this Court under the 

EAJA to enter an order awarding Plaintiff $2,950.00 in attorney fees and expenses, 

and $400.00 in costs, in the total amount of $3,350.00 (three thousand three hundred 

fifty dollars). The award of attorney fees, costs, and expenses will fully satisfy and 

settle any and all of Plaintiff’s claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 that may be payable in 

this case. 

Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff and can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt 

that Plaintiff owes the United States, pursuant to the decision in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 

U.S. 586, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). After the Court enters this award, if counsel for the 

parties can verify that Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant 
2

agrees to direct that the award be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the 

EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees 

Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #13) is 

accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney 

fees, costs, and expenses in the total amount of $3,350.00; 

2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this 

Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such 

pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award 

directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment 

signed by Plaintiff; and 

3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: July 19, 2019 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington

 United States Magistrate Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: CASE NO. 1:18-CR-109 (2)

:

vs. :

: Honorable Timothy S. Black

:

SERGHEI VERLAN, et al. :

ORDER UNSEALING ARREST WARRANT

Having considered the Government’s Motion to Unseal Arrest Warrant for Defendant 

Serghei Verlan, it is ORDERED that the arrest warrant is hereby unsealed.

DATE HONORABLE TIMOTHY S. BLACK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 68-1 Filed: 10/29/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 475
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     1st Quarter 2000 10Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882288
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund IV, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,216
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                   783
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13
<PP&E>                                         113,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                 46,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 75,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,123
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     72,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   75,105
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,431
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (41)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                748
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   748
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Stephen
Pelletier, Chief Executive Officer and President of Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2009



/s/ Stephen PelletierName:

Stephen PelletierTitle:

Chief Executive Officer and President


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Matthew SYKENY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1176

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10402

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

ROBERTO AGUILAR, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:15-CR-186-1 

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Roberto Aguilar has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Aguilar has filed a response as well as a motion to appoint new counsel. The 

record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of

Aguilar’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fif h Circuit

FILED

August 11, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10402 Document: 00514112171 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2017
No. 16-10402

2 

consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. 

Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). 

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Aguilar’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Because the appeal is frivolous, Aguilar’s motion to 

appoint new counsel is DENIED. 

 Case: 16-10402 Document: 00514112171 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2017
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, 

INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA 

MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION 

This document relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

Case No.: 2:18-md-2846

JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. 

Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE RE: PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF THE 

VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF STEVE ELDRIDGE 

I hereby certify that on October 25, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

served via email to counsel for Defendants: 

Michael K. Brown 

REED SMITH LLP 

355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514 

(213) 457-8000 

mkbrown@reedsmith.com

Eric L. Alexander 

Matthew D. Jacobson 

Jesse J. Ash 

REED SMITH, LLP 

1301 K Street, NW 

Suite 1000 – East Tower 

Washington, DC 20005 

(202) 414-9200 

ealexander@reedsmith.com 

mjacobson@reedsmith.com 

jash@reedsmith.com 

William D. Kloss, Jr. 

Henrique A. Geigel 

Arryn K. Miner 

Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease 

52 East Gay Street 

Columbus, OH 43215 

(614) 464-6202

wdklossjr@vorys.com

hageigel@vorys.com

akminer@vorys.com

Lori G. Cohen 

Marcella C. Ducca 

Sean P. Jessee 

Greenberg Traurig, LLP 

Terminus 200 

3333 Piedmont Road, NE, Suite 2500 

Atlanta, GA 30305 

cohenl@gtlaw.com

duccam@gtlaw.com

jessees@gtlaw.com

/s/ David J. Butler

Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 671 Filed: 10/25/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 8084
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,431
<SECURITIES>                                    24,355
<RECEIVABLES>                                      602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         83
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,955
<PP&E>                                           4,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,311
<SALES>                                            240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,493
<CGS>                                              130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (985)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (985)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (985)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 55 

To consent to the amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 

1920, made by Act 080 of the Session Laws of Hawaii, 2017. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2021 

Mr. KAHELE (for himself, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. CASE, Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas, Mr. 

COLE, Ms. LEGER FERNANDEZ, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. 

PALLONE, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mr. SABLAN, and Mr. SAN NICOLAS) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

To consent to the amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, made by Act 080 of the Session 

Laws of Hawaii, 2017. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Prince 

5 Jonah Ku ̄hio ̄ Kalaniana‘ole Protecting Family Legacies 

6 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 55 IH 

1 SEC. 2. CONSENT TO AMENDMENTS. 

2 As required by section 4 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act 

3 to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii into 

4 the Union’’, approved March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4), the 

5 United States consents to the amendments to the Hawai6 ian Homes Commission Act, 1920, made by Act 080 of 

7 the Session Laws of Hawaii, 2017, as adopted by the 

8 State of Hawaii in the manner required for State legisla9 tion. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Amendment No. 1 to Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.10 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”),
dated as of January 1, 2009, to the Services Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) dated as of May 23, 2007, by and between SPECTRUM GLOBAL FUND ADMINISTRATION, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
(“Company”), on the one hand, and KENMAR GLOBAL TRUST, a Delaware statutory trust (the “Client”), on the other hand. 
 W I T N E S S E T H : 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Client entered into the Original
Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Client desire to amend the Original Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment to the Original Agreement. The Company agrees that it shall not increase the Administrative Services Fee described in Section 3.1 of the Original Agreement and on Exhibit B to the
Original Agreement at any time prior to December 31, 2009. 
 2. Remainder of Original Agreement. Except as provided in
Section 1 hereof, the Original Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect, and each reference to the Original Agreement and words of similar import in the Agreement, as amended hereby, shall be a reference to the Original
Agreement as amended hereby and as the same may be further amended, supplemented and otherwise modified and in effect from time to time. 
 3. Miscellaneous. 
 (a) Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meaning ascribed to them in the Original Agreement. 
 (b) Entire Agreement. This Amendment No. 1 constitutes the entire
agreement and understanding of the parties hereto with respect to its subject matter and supercedes all oral communication and prior writings (except as otherwise provided herein) with respect thereto. 
 (c) Amendments. No amendment, modification or waiver in respect of this Amendment No. 1 will be effective unless in writing (including a
writing evidenced by facsimile transmission) and executed by each of the parties hereto. 







 (d) Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed and delivered in counterparts
(including by facsimile), each of which will be deemed an original. 
 (e) Headings. The headings used in this Amendment No. 1
are for convenience of reference only and are not to affect the constructions of or be taken into consideration in interpreting this Amendment No. 1. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the day and year first written above. 
 CLIENT: 
  

			
	KENMAR GLOBAL TRUST
		
	By:	 	 Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.,
 it’s Managing Owner

		
	By:	 	/s/ Esther E. Goodman
		 	 Name: Esther E. Goodman
 Title:   Senior
Executive Vice President and
             Chief Operating Officer

	
	 COMPANY:
  
 SPECTRUM GLOBAL FUND ADMINISTRATION, L.L.C.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Carol A. Burke
		 	 Name: Carol A. Burke
 Title:   Chief
Executive Officer


  

 2
Madelyn SMILEY v. Carlos SMILEY

2160268

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.