alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
M & T BANK, Appellant, v. Carlos MONGIELLO; Beatriz Mesa a/k/a Beatriz Cecilia Mesa; and Tara Cay III Homeowner's Association Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-2180

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Andre Renard DOYLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4626

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

John P. McLaughlin, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Christine R. Larson, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, of PDL BioPharma, Inc. (the Registrant), each hereby certifies in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on his or her
knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of the Registrant, to which this certification is
attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 8, 2009



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ John P. McLaughlin                    
|John P. McLaughlin                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer     
|(Principal Executive Officer)             
|                                          
|/s/ Christine R. Larson                   
|Christine R. Larson                       
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  
<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the financial statements contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the 
period ending December 31, 1994 and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.  
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000799089
<NAME>                          INFORMIX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
         
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                          163,260
<SECURITIES>                    98,685
<RECEIVABLES>                   195,430
<ALLOWANCES>                    12,710
<INVENTORY>                     2,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                471,898
<PP&E>                          147,163
<DEPRECIATION>                  69,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  674,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           225,560
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1,353
<OTHER-SE>                      421,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    674,416
<SALES>                         535,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                708,985
<CGS>                           37,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   126,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                422,885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                8,377
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 166,140
<INCOME-TAX>                    60,807
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             105,333
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    105,333
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.76
        

</TABLE>
#### Purefoy vs. Hill & Co.

A discontinuance as to one of several defendants, served with process, in an action upon a joint and several promissory note, is a discontinuance as to all. *(Jester vs. Hooper,*13 *Ark.*47, and previous cases.)

*Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ouachita county*

The Hon. Abner A. Stith, Circuit Judge.

Steaih for the appellant.

Watkins & Gallagher for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Hanly

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was *assumpsit*brought by the appellees, against the appellant and one William E. Hundley, on a joint and several promissory note, to the October term of the Ouachita Circuit Court, 1855.

Summons returned duly executed on both defendants.

The record shows that, at the return term, the appellant made default, and at the same term, the appellees, by attorney, appeared and discontinued the action as to Hundley, and took judgment final, by default, against the appellant, for the amount of the note, including interest in damages, and costs.

Purefoy then appeared and appealed to this Court, and assigns for error the discontinuance as to Hundley, his co-defendant in the Court below, and the rendering of judgment against himself; insisting, as he does, that the discontinuance as to his co-defendant operated as a discontinuance as to him.

*362The question presented by the record in this cause is no longer an open one in this State.

It is well settled under our statute, that a person having a cause of action, *ex contractu,*against several, may sue one, any, or all of them at his pleasure; yet, if he sue more than one, he thereby elects to treat the contract as *joint*and a discontinuance as to one defendant, who has been served with process, operates as a discontinuance of the suit as to all the other defendants. See *Frazier et al. vs. State Bank,*4 *Ark. R.*509; *Hanly vs. Real Estate Bank, same*600; *Beebe vs. R. E. Bank, same*552; *Hutchings et al. vs. R. E. Bank, same*517; *Ashley vs. Hyde*& *Goodrich,*1 *Eng. R.*96-'7; *Pleasants vs. State Bank,*3 *Eng. R.*456; *Jester vs. Hooper,*13 *Ark. R.*47; *Sillivant*& *Thorn vs. Reardon,*5 *Ark. R.*153.

The appellees having discontinued their action against Hund-ley, one of the defendants, who was also duly served with process, must be held as having discontinued as to the appellant, the other defendant in the Court below.

The judgment of the Ouachita Circuit Court in this behalf is, therefore, reversed, and the cause remanded to be proceeded in.
----

----

----

----

----

|        If to      Employer:        CytRx      Corporation       11726      San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 650       Los      Angeles, California  90049       Facsimile:                  (310)      826-5529       Attention:                  Chief      Executive Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              If to      Employee:        __________________       __________________       __________________                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

----

|   |  “EMPLOYER” CytRx      Corporation  By: /s/      STEVEN A.      KRIEGSMAN                                                               Steven A.KriegsmanChief Executive      Officer |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   “EMPLOYEE”  /s/ SCOTT      WIELAND                                                               Scott      Wieland                                                                  |

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-30585 Summary Calendar

TRAFFIC SCAN NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARC E. WINSTON; TRAFFIC CAMERA REPORTS, INC.; MARCO OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC.; WINSTON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION;

WINSTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(92-CV-2243 R)

February 15, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This matter is before the court on appeal of defendants’ motion for summary judgment

and the dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff’s state law claims. Having considered the

briefs and summary judgment record, on the facts as found, authorities cited, and analysis1 In footnote 9 of the Memorandum and Order (Vol. 5, p. 1063) the second reference to

Traffic Camera was inadvertent; it should be “Traffic Scan.”

2 made by the district court in its comprehensive and schola rly Memorandum and Order 1

rendered May 24, 1995 and entered May 25, 1995, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


          I, C. Steven Guenthner, Chief Financial Officer of Almost Family, Inc.
     (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
     of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company  for the annual  period
          ended  December  31,  2004  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements  of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date:    March 31, 2005                     By  /s/ C. Steven Guenthner
         ------------------                   -------------------------
                                              C. Steven Guenthner
                                              Senior Vice President & Chief
                                              Financial Officer



    A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been
    provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
       to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
Karl W. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3327

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.11

                                    AGREEMENT

This AGREEMENT is entered into on the 21st day of November, 2003, by and between
Robert Blanchard ("RB"), Grand Rapids, MI and BestNet Communications Corp.
("BCC"), Grand Rapids, MI.

WHEREAS, RB desires to continue being employed as BCC CEO, and

WHEREAS, BCC desires to continue employing RB as its CEO.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above, the parties agree as follows:

1.   All prior employment contracts, amendments, modifications or extensions
     thereto, between RB and BCC are null and void.

2.   RB is employed as CEO of BCC, and responsible for fulfilling all normal and
     typical duties of the position.

3.   As consideration for being CEO, BCC agrees to the following compensation
     for RB, effective December 1, 2003:

     a.   $9,000 per month, for no less than six months.
     b.   Continuation of health, sick days, and vacation days benefits.
     c.   Sign-on bonus of 100,000 share of BCC common stock
     d.   Common stock incentives as follows:
          i.   200,000 shares in the event EBITDA is positive for any one
               quarter during CY2004
          ii.  100,000 shares in the event EBITDA is positive for a 2nd full
               quarter during CY 2004
     e.   Cash bonus of up to 25% of salary will be paid based upon a four
          quarter Net Revenue target. Cash bonus of up to 25% of salary will be
          paid based upon a four quarter EBITDA target. The Net Revenue and
          EBITDA targets will be determined by the Board of Directors prior to
          December 15, 2003.

4.   Either party may terminate this AGREEMENT upon 30 day notice.

5.   In the event of resignation, one month severance and health benefits will
     be paid.

6.   In the event of termination, three months severance and health benefits
     will be paid

7.   In the event of termination as a result of a "Change in Control, as
     commonly defined, six months severance and health benefits will be paid.

8.   In the event of either resignation or termination, no accrued vacation,
     sick days or personal days will be paid.

9.   RB shall devote substantially all his work time to BCC, and shall not work
     for compensation for any other entity without the approval of the Board of
     Directors.

Signed:  /s/  Richard Bourke
       --------------------------------
              Richard Bourke, Chairman
              BestNet Communications


Signed:  /s/  Robert A. Blanchard
       --------------------------------
              Robert A. Blanchard
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of The Center for Wound Healing, Inc; (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
G. Barnett, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
that:
  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  October
9, 2009


/s/
      Andrew G. BarnettAndrew
      G. Barnett, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer
Troy WHEATHERSPOON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2025

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 14, 2017

Following review of the petition for writ of prohibition, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied. *See**Asay v. State*, 769 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2000).

SUAREZ, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ., concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1168 

To prohibit all United States assessed and voluntary contributions to the 

World Health Organization until such time as the membership in the 

World Health Organization of the People’s Republic of China is terminated and the Republic of China (Taiwan) is afforded full rights, privileges, and responsibilities as a Member State in the World Health Organization, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2021 

Mr. PERRY (for himself and Mr. GAETZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit all United States assessed and voluntary contributions to the World Health Organization until such 

time as the membership in the World Health Organization of the People’s Republic of China is terminated 

and the Republic of China (Taiwan) is afforded full 

rights, privileges, and responsibilities as a Member State 

in the World Health Organization, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘World Health Act’’. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1168 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEMBERSHIP OF TAIWAN IN THE WORLD HEALTH 

2 ORGANIZATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, effective on the date of the enactment of this 

5 Act, the United States shall withhold all assessed and vol6 untary contributions to the World Health Organization 

7 until such time as the membership of the People’s Repub8 lic of China in the World Health Organization is termi9 nated and the Republic of China (Taiwan) is afforded full 

10 rights, privileges, and responsibilities as a Member State 

11 in the World Health Organization. 

12 (b) PRESIDENTIAL ACTION.—The President is au13 thorized to take any appropriate action to carry out sub14 section (a). 

15 (c) ACTIONS AT THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZA16 TION.—The President shall direct the United States rep17 resentative to the World Health Organization to use the 

18 voice, vote, and influence of the United States at the 

19 World Health Organization to encourage Members States 

20 of the World Health Organization to take actions identical 

21 or similar to the action described in subsection (a). 

22 (d) NO EFFECT ON THE UNITED STATES IN THE

23 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.—United States mem24 bership in the World Health Organization shall not be af25 fected in any way by the any action under this section. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
Tony Lavaughn PEPPERS v. STATE

CR-15-0565

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

May 20, 2020

Before

MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER, Circuit Judge

AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge

No. 19

‐ 2289

CARLOS ALVAREZ

‐ ESPINO,

Petitioner,

v

.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

of the United States,

Respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals.

No. A200

‐ 557

‐ 981

O R D E R

Petitioner filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on May 4, 2020. No

judge in regular active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc

and all members of the original panel have voted to deny rehearing and to issue an

amended opinion. The court’s opinion dated March 6, 2020 is amended by the attached

opinion, which includes changes to pages 2, 5, and 8.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and rehearing en

banc is therefore DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, I, Thomas J. Diemer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 13, 2011



/s/ Thomas J. DiemerName: Thomas J. DiemerTitle:   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.



53
ex101-1.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1.1

    


    Terms of
January 2009 Amendment to Employment Agreement

    between
Bay National Bank and Hugh W. Mohler

    


    


    Hugh
Mohler’s annual base compensation was voluntarily decreased from $255,000 as of
January 1, 2008 to $229,500 as of September 5, 2008 and then decreased to
$206,000, effective January 23, 2009.

    


    No
discretionary bonuses were paid to Mr. Mohler with respect to 2008
performance.
Concoryen Charles ASKEW v. STATE

CR-16-0029

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CEM Inputs ID Number: FRET 09

- 0536

Product: unknown Chemical Name: CAS 1464989

- 16

- 9

Scenario: General Purpose Cleaner Population: Adult

Molecular Weight (g/mole): 192.3 Vapor Pressure (torr) 0.0135

Consumer Product Weight Fraction

- Central Tendency (unitless): 0.01 Consumer Product Weight Fraction

- High

- End (unitless): 0.25

Inhalation Inputs

Frequency of Use (chronic) (events/yr): 300 Exposure Duration (chronic) (years): 57

Frequency of Use (acute) (events/day): 1 Exposure Duration (acute) (days): 1

Mass of Product Used per Event

- Central

Tendency (g): 61.5 Mass of Product Used per Event

- High

- End

(g): 123

Inhalation Rate During Use (m 3 /hr): 0.74 Duration of Event

- Central Tendency

(hours/event): 0.667

Inhalation Rate After Use (m 3 /hr): 0.611 Duration of Event

- High

- End (hours/event): 1.42

Zone 1 Volume (m 3 ): 36 Whole House Volume (m 3 ): 523

Air Exchange Rate (air exchanges/hr): 0.45 Body Weight (kg): 80

Activity Patterns (Note: 1=Bedroom 2= Kitchen 3=Bathroom 4=Living Room

5=Utility Room 6=Car 7=Out)

User: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 5 4 2 4 6 7 4 2 2 7 4 4 4 1

Non

- User: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 4 4 2 4 7 7 4 2 2 7 4 4 4 1

Hour: 0 6 12 18

Start Time: 7 Room of Use: 2. Kitchen

Dermal Inputs

Frequency of Use (chronic) (events/yr): 300 SA/BW (cm2/kg): 12.3

Frequency of Use (acute) (events/day): 1

Exposure Duration (chronic) (years): 57

Amount Retained / Absorbed to Skin

(g/cm2

- event): 3.49e

- 05 Exposure Duration (acute) (days): 1

Averaging Time (chronic) (days): 2.85e+04 Averaging Time (acute) (days) : 1CEM Inhalation Exposure Estimates

ID Number: FRET 09

- 0536

Scenario: General Purpose Cleaner Population: Adult

Exposure Duration (years) chronic: 57 Exposure Duration (days) acute: 1

Exposure Units Result AT (days)

Chronic Cancer

LADD pot (mg/kg

- day) 1.35e

- 02 2.85e+04

LADC pot (mg/m 3 ) 7.30e

- 02 2.85e+04

Acute

ADR pot (mg/kg

- day) 6.42e

- 01 1

Cp pot (mg/m 3 ) 1.08e+01 NA

LADD

- Lifetime Average Daily Dose (mg/kg

- day) LADC

- Lifetime Average Daily Concentration (mg/m 3 )

ADR

- Acute Dose Rate (mg/kg

- day) Cp

- Peak Concentration (mg/m 3 )

Note: 75 years = 2.738e+04 days pot

- potential dose

Note: The general Agency guidance for assessing short

- term, infrequent events (for most chemicals, an exposure of less than 24

hours that occurs no more frequently than monthly) is to treat such events as independent, acute exposures rather than as

chronic exposure. (Methods for Exposure

- Response Analysis for Acute Inhalatio n Exposure to Chemicals (External

Review Draft). EPA/600/R

- 98/051. April 1998)CEM Dermal Exposure Estimates

ID Number: FRET 09

- 0536

Scenario: General Purpose Cleaner Population: Adult

Exposure Duration (chronic) (years): 57 Exposure Duration (acute) (days): 1

Exposure Units Result AT (days)

Chronic Cancer

LADD pot (mg/kg

- day) 2.58e

- 03 2.85e+04

Acute

ADR pot (mg/kg

- day) 1.07e

- 01 1

LADD

- Lifetime Average Daily Dose (mg/kg

- day)

ADR

- Acute Dose Rate (mg/kg

- day)