alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          45,625
<SECURITIES>                                    18,009
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,610
<INVENTORY>                                     21,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,135
<PP&E>                                         149,129
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 257,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,024
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                     214,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   257,215
<SALES>                                        134,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,186
<CGS>                                           54,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,949
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   793
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,209
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,109
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37


</TABLE>
Extension of Executive Employment Agreement, Patrick Bratton



 Exhibit 10.23 
 EXECUTION COPY 
 EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Extension”) is made as of February 28, 2009 by and between Atlantic Broadband Management, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and Patrick Bratton (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered an
Executive Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) which will expire on February 28, 2009; 
 WHEREAS the Company and
Executive desire to enter into a new employment agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to extend the terms of the Agreement on an interim
basis for a period of six months to allow parties sufficient time to enter a new agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 Section 1. Extension of Employment Period The Employment Period shall be extended for a period of six months, beginning on the date of this Extension, unless terminated earlier under the provisions of Section 5
(a) (ii) – (iii) or by execution of a new employment agreement by Company and Executive. The term “fifth anniversary” is amended to read “fifth anniversary plus six months” wherever it appears in the
Agreement. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unamended. 
 Section 2. Retroactive Effect The terms and consideration as agreed to
by Company and Executive in a new employment agreement to be entered into following the date hereof shall apply retroactively to March 1, 2009. 
 Section 3. Capitalized Terms Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement. 
 Section 4.
Governing Law. Issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Extension will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any
choice of law or conflict of law rules or provisions (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware. In furtherance of the foregoing, the
internal law of the State of Delaware will control the interpretation and construction of this Extension, even though under Delaware’s choice of law or conflict of law analysis, the substantive law of some other jurisdiction would ordinarily
apply. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension of Executive Employment Agreement as of the date
first written above. 
  

			
	ATLANTIC BROADBAND MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	
	
	  

	Patrick Bratton
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 88 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 8 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 2022 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

4 DERBY RACES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

6 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 88 RDS 

1 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

2 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 

3 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

4 June 18, 2022, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

5 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

6 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

7 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

9 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

10 Board, the event shall be— 

11 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

12 public; and 

13 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

14 Congress. 

15 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

17 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

18 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

19 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap20 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

21 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

22 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

23 for the event. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HCON 88 RDS 

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

3 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange4 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 

5 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

6 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce7 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

8 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise9 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

10 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

11 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 88 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby. 

JUNE 7, 2022 

Received 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Brian Frederick LUCAS v. STATE

CR-15-1204

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|               |  |    |  |                                        
|-------------- |  | -- |  | ---------------------------------------
|               |  |    |  | Bank of America, N.A.,                 
|               |  |    |  | Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|               |  |   
|August 6, 2014 |  | By |  | /S/ DICKERMAN C. SADLER                
|               |  |    |  | Dickerman C. Sadler                    
|               |  |    |  | Managing Director
Eberle FRANCOIS, Jr., Appellant, v. Jeffrey Lee LEDFORD, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3621

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
13 December 2009

Happy Birthday Army National Guard!

You sure look good for 373! In fact, the modern Army National Guard has never looked better. We have 

proven our relevance in domestic and combat operations and defined ourselves as a true operational force. 

In the current high OPTEMPO environment, our forces, both generating and operating, have shown that 

not only is the Guard meeting readiness requirements, we are often the leaders in those key initiatives, 

programs, and partnerships sustaining the 21st century Army. The Army National Guard revolutionized 

military recruiting. The quality of our force has never been higher! After years of historic end-strength 

growth, we successfully shifted to a focus of quality and training the force. The Army National Guard 

has made judicious investments in personnel training, equipping, policy needs, and Family and Employer 

support. 

At 358,200 Soldiers strong, we are fielding the most robust Guard force ever imagined. And a defining 

element of this force is the versatility of our Citizen Soldiers. You are trained and ready to meet the 

needs of our unique dual mission, and are adaptable and agile in response to the requirements of a volatile 

era. Our Warriors are capable of functioning across a broad spectrum of conflict and in any environment. 

In this year alone, over 52,000 Citizen Soldiers deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan while over 11,000

Soldiers at home supported operations including the Presidential Inauguration, the North Dakota floods, 

Kentucky ice storms, the G20 summit, and the American Samoa tsunami to name a few. For those 

currently deployed, we are so proud of you; we support you, and wish you a safe return home. 

General George Washington profoundly noted that, "When we assumed the soldier, we did not set aside 

the citizen." As Soldiers in this organization, you too are well prepared to be leaders in your community. 

This is why the Army National Guard is such a national treasure, because the investment in the Soldier 

pays dividends in the form of the Citizen whose character and competence add value to the communities 

across America. For almost four centuries members of the militia and National Guard have served this 

nation with pride and honor. This generation of selfless volunteers is no different, you are answering the 

Nation’s call. You are the epitome of the Citizen Soldier; Guardsmen and women, who only get better 

with age! 

Happy Birthday!

Major General Raymond W. Carpenter

Acting Director, Army National Guard
EX-4.11






Exhibit 4.11




Consent of Steven Ristorcelli




     I, Steven Ristorcelli, hereby confirm that I have read those portions of the Notice of Meeting
and Management Information Circular of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. (“Aurora”), dated March 20,
2009 (the “Circular”) and relating to the special meeting of shareholders of Aurora to approve the
amalgamation of Aurora and 59801 Newfoundland & Labrador Inc., which Circular incorporates by
reference the annual information form of Fronteer Development Group Inc. (“Fronteer”) dated
March 27, 2008 for its year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”), that directly pertain to the
Technical Reports (as defined in the following paragraph).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports in the AIF or other documents
incorporated by reference therein: (i) the technical report dated November 1, 2007 entitled
“Updated Technical Report of the Zaca Project, Alpine County, California, USA” prepared together
with David Griffith, (ii) the technical report dated November 1, 2007 entitled “Updated Technical
Report Northumberland Project, Nye County, Nevada, USA” prepared together with Michael M. Gustin
and George Lanier, and (iii) the technical report dated July 15, 2006 entitled “Technical Report
Northumberland Project, Nye County, Nevada, USA” prepared together with Michael M. Gustin and
George Lanier (collectively, the “Technical Reports”). I further consent to the inclusion in the
Circular and Fronteer’s registration statement on Form F-8 relating to the Circular filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration Statement”) of the Technical
Reports (through the inclusion by way of incorporation by reference of the AIF in the Circular) and
of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Reports in the Circular and the Registration
Statement or any documents incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Reports and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Reports contained in the Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Reports
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Reports.



	 	 	 	 	 
	March 20, 2009

	 	(signed) Steven Ristorcelli
 

Steven Ristorcelli, R.P.Geo.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1400. SHANTICE GLINSEY v. JAMAAL GLINSEY.

Shantice Glinsey has filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s final

judgment and decree granting her petition for divorce from Jamaal Glinsey.

1 We lack

jurisdiction. 

Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), appeals from “judgments or orders in

divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases” must be made by application

for discretionary appeal. “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is

jurisdictional.” Hair Restoration Specialists v. State of Ga., 360 Ga. App. 901, 903

(862 SE2d 564) (2021) (punctuation omitted). Because Shantice Glinsey failed to

follow the requisite discretionary application procedure, we lack jurisdiction to

consider this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Ford v. Ford, 347 Ga.

App. 233, 234 (818 SE2d 690) (2018). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Shantice Glinsey filed her appeal to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which

transferred the case to this Court. See Case No. S22A0845 (April 19, 2022).

June 03, 2022

06/03/2022
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 96 

Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate America’s commitment 

to a free press by honoring journalists who sacrificed their lives in 

service to that cause. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO (for herself and Mr. COLE) submitted the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate America’s commitment to a free press by honoring journalists 

who sacrificed their lives in service to that cause. 

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code, 

provides that the location of a commemorative work in 

Area I, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Commemorative 

Areas Washington, DC and Environs’’, numbered 869/ 

86501 B, and dated June 24, 2003, shall be deemed to 

be authorized only if a recommendation for the location 

is approved by law not later than 150 calendar days after 

the date on which Congress is notified of the recommendation; 

Whereas Public Law 116–253 authorized the Fallen Journalists Memorial Foundation to establish a memorial on 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 96 IH 

Federal land in the District of Columbia to commemorate 

America’s commitment to a free press by honoring journalists who sacrificed their lives in service to that cause; 

and 

Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress 

of the determination of the Secretary of the Interior that 

the memorial should be located in area I: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the location of a commemorative work to commemo4 rate America’s commitment to a free press by honoring 

5 journalists who sacrificed their lives in service to that 

6 cause within Area I, as depicted on the map entitled 

7 ‘‘Commemorative Areas Washington, DC and Environs’’, 

8 numbered 869/86501 B, and dated June 24, 2003, is ap9 proved. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Case: 3:18-mj-00171-SLO Doc #: 5 Filed: 03/27/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 86
Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 124 Filed: 11/18/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 687
Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 124 Filed: 11/18/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 688
ST319-02

Eagle.

Mountain

Scientific ^ Inc.

AUTOMATED BOX STACK TEST DATA SHEET

Client NRG Energy, Inc. ___________ Test Date c^^V" ID

Facility Vienna_______________________ Start/Stop Time ________jTV^.S ~~/€<$f\

Unit g Test Method s

"rKT

Location Stack________________________ Run Number d^*Tl>^0

Project # 9Q2637________________________ Description

Operator ^v J) ^W Carbon Trap ID

RUN DATA

ID#

IDS

ID#

Pitot ID #

M ;e in l iiit

pbar "^5\^\ '"Hg # Points t\ <Q Nozzle Dia. (in) Filter#________________________ Timc/Pt ~5Jf"7 Probe ID # MF# Q Vyq, Port Order t^> del H @ Q £>g»T>

Pstack ______________ ________InH20 Pitot Cocf q.84 Meter Factor \\OQ Sample Time ffi") min Tcst# i Data File Name PosY ~\V -r^"

LcakChk CFM. Vac lnit„ Time Pitot Leak Check Run CFM. Vac Init^ Time

Pre

Post

02

C02

< 0.02 cfm or 4% of Sample Rate Stable @ > 3" 15 sec

1 2 3 Average

ff.O

DATA CORRECTIONS / RECORD

EndVol Start VolDiff Omit Description

w\vj>o-e, \TVp^ tHGS

MATERIAL WEIGHT (g) 50ml Rinse Y N

Impingcr End Start Diff ID #

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

Total

Sample Point Time Delta P Delta H Meter Reading Vacuum Temperatures (°F) Meter

Port Point (min) (in. H,0) (in. H,0) (acf) (in. Hg) Stack Probe Filter Imp Out In Out

0 0 utA-.Lvx*V,

r&k. | fiffgta ^ ?o^ tVO&C* ^

Vfc£ 1 pnui 1 s

i\w. *~\ He fyoos v^ iW, a- fl.ioa

jH;u. -^i o»o ?6<,V n{oaj\T 'wirt -V omr f- -,

IJTao I L JK^ ^ D,ntft itf' /.Of- } 0 .1R< YtoV iSvbflC |^5

3 Ve- ^^oj- m/

4

5

6
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman, President, and
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
May 11, 2010/s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithExecutive Vice President, and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
May 11, 2010
Jarkee Javouis WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3748

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Siobhan Helene Shea, Special Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Ciklin, Conner, JJ., and Roberts, Kathleen H., Associate Judge, concur.
Ali D. MCKINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4321

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Zachary Charles WILLIS v. STATE

CR-15-1269

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017 Reh. denied March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882342
<NAME> 90CC
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          66,520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,630
<PP&E>                                       5,769,917
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,901,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 988,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,209
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     969,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   988,975
<SALES>                                         91,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,844
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,625)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,625)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Brandon VALDIVIA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM and Adriana Ruiz, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1960

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 25, 2017

Upon the Court's own motion, it is ordered that this administrative appeal from the Department of Revenue, Child Support Program is dismissed for failure to comply with this Court's order dated August 29, 2017, and with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LUCK, JJ., concur.