Kyle Lomazow 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division Western Team 

222 West ih Avenue, 'Box 14 

Anchorage Alaska 99513 

T: 425-2271847 

F (425) 227-1007 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

ln the Matter of: Docket No. FAA-2014-0865 

FAA Case No. 2011NM730060 

Seahawk Air, Inc. 

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO ORDER DIRECTING THE 

PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER REGARDING LITIGATION 

AND SCHEDULING ISSUES 

The Complainant in this matter respectfully requests that Your Honor schedules 

the telephonic prehearing conference as Complainant, after having a few initial 

discussions with John L. Wright, opposing counsel for Seahawk Air, has not been 

successful in reaching Mr. Wright to discuss the scheduling issues outlined in the 

Order Your Honor served on April 4, 2016. 

On Monday, May 2, 2016, the undersigned called Mr. Wright and the individual 

answering his phone indicated that Mr. Wright was unavailable, but would return 

the phone call by the end of Monday. Today is Tuesday and the undersigned has 

yet to hear from Mr. Wright. 

The undersigned has attempted to reach Mr. Wright multiple times in the last 

week and a half, but upon reaching his office have been advised that Mr. Wright is 

either on the phone with a client or is unavailable. On Monday, May 2, the 

undersigned left Mr. Wright a voicemail indicating that if he does not hear back 

from him by Tuesday morning the undersigned planned on responding to the 

Order and letting Your Honor know that attempts to reach Mr. Wright have not 

been successful. The undersigned has not received a return phone call from Mr. 

Wright. 

~i 

!i! 

( 
In regards to a discovery schedule, the undersigned proposes to have the period 

for discovery start effective immediately and expire June 30,2016. Or as an 

alternative have discovery begin after the pre-trial telephone conference is held 

and last for two months. 

1n regards to scheduling the pre-trial telephone conference, the undersigned is 

available any dates, but the following: 

Friday, April 13 

The week of June 20'h (FAA conference in Kansas City) 

June 29 

July 13 through 16 

Respectfully submitted this 3'd day of May, 2016. 

Kyle Lomazow 

FAA Attorney 

Response to Order Directing the Parties to Meet and Confer 

Regarding Litigation and Scheduling Issues 

FAA Case No. 2011NM730060 

Page 2 of3 

Kyle Lomazow, FAA Attorney 

T (425) 227·1847 

F (425) 227-1007 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing Response to the Order Directing the Parties to 

Meet and Confer Regarding Litigation and Scheduling Issues has been served via 

facsimile and certified mail- return receipt requested, to the following: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, D,C, 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

FAX: (202) 267-1293 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearirgs, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 

FAX: (202)-366-7536 

John L. Wright, Respondent tor Counsel 

The Law Office of John L. W:ight, P.C. 

11705 Airport Way, Suite 307 

Broomfield, CO 80021 

TEL: (303)-747-4000 

Fax: (303) 747-4001 

Dated this 3'd day ofMay,2016. 

Patricia L. Baysinger 

Legal Program Specialist 

Enforcement Division 

Western Team 

222 W.71

h Avenue Box 14 

Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 

(907) 271-5264 

Response to Order Directing the Parties to Meet and Confer 

Regarding Litigation and Scheduling Issues 

Kyle Lomazow, FAA Attorney 

T (425) 227·1847 

FAA Case No. 2011NM730060 F (425) 227·1007 

Page 3 of 3