alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TGC Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 of our report dated March 18, 2011 included in its Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-142221, File No. 333-118588 and File No. 333-13947) dated March 18, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules for the three years ended December 31, 2010 listed in the accompanying index.

 
| /s/   Lane Gorman Trubitt, PLLC |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| Dallas,   Texas                 |   |
| March 18,   2011           |   |

 

----
Emile George WISDOM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4758

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 25, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed because of the appellant's failure to satisfy this court's December 5, 2017, fee order.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
AO 442 (Rev. 11/11) Arrest Warrant

FILED

RICHARD W.N'AGEL

CLtKK Uh l-UUr.'!

United States District Court zoibjuljs pii3;2i,

for the

Southern District of Ohio

United States of America

V.

VLADIMIR PESTEREANU,

a/k/a "Vova"

Defendant

LS. DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DIST OHIO

WEST OIV ClHCiNHATI

Case No. 1:18-cr-00109(5)

CD

CD

ARREST WARRANT

o

X-T.

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

KXJ

YOU ARE COMMANDED toarrest and bring before a United States magistrate judgewithout unnecessary delay

(name ofperson to be arrested) VLADIMIR PESTEREANU ,

who is accusedof an offense or violation based on the following document filed with the court:

sT Indictment • Superseding Indictment • Information • Superseding Information • Complaint

• Probation Violation Petition Gl Supervised Release Violation Petition C! Violation Notice • Order ofthe Court

This offense is briefly described as follows:

18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) - Conspiracy to Participate in Racketeering Activity

[SEE ATTACHED INDICTMENT]

Date: 7/25/2018

City and state: CINCINNATI, OHIO

Issuing officar'ssignal

Richard W. Nagel, Clerk, U.S.

Prtntad tume and title

Return

This warrant was received on (date) 6113^6 j^oi ?r ,and the person was arrested on (date) a7/31 / "lot^

&\ (city and state) iJa. •

Date: -

Arresting officer's signature

Printed name and title

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 65 Filed: 10/10/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 467
Order entered August 5, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00238-CV

BRIAN POTASHNIK, ET AL., Appellants

V.

JEFFREY W. CARPENTER, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-08-02072-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s August 1, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of time 

to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to September 24, 

2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
J. J., the Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 3D17-1889

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

I, T. Stephen Thompson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Immtech International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

   Date:  August 14, 2003

      /s/ T. Stephen Thompson
      --------------------------------
         T. Stephen Thompson
         President & Chief Executive Officer
Bruce Allen WILLIAMS Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-0149

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 22, 2018

Ryan Thomas Truskoski of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Bruce Allen Williams Jr. was charged with four counts of robbery with a firearm and two counts of aggravated assault with a firearm. Judge Frank Bell presided over the trial, and the jury found Williams guilty as charged. This is Williams's appeal.

Before sentencing, Judge Bell announced he would recuse from further proceedings, meaning another judge would impose sentence. In a jointly filed motion, defense counsel and the State asked that Judge Bell provide specific findings to explain the recusal. The joint filing explained that such findings were necessary "to ensure the integrity of the trial record." Judge Bell denied the request for specific findings, but explained that a conflict of interest arose after the trial was completed but before sentencing-and that the unspecified basis of the conflict would not be relevant to any post-trial motions. The case was reassigned to another judge, who handled the sentencing hearing. At that hearing, Williams announced to the new judge that Judge Bell had a conflict during trial. The new judge sentenced Williams to life in prison.

On appeal, Williams raises a single issue. He argues that Judge Bell committed reversible error by failing to articulate specific reasons for his recusal. Williams argues that without knowing the details of the post-trial recusal, he cannot know whether Judge Bell's conflict "infect[ed] the trial itself." But Williams has cited no authority that would require us to reverse.

Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330, which addresses the disqualification of trial judges, provides that "[n]othing in this rule limits the judge's ability to enter an order of disqualification on the judge's own initiative." And although there may be reasons a judge would explain his or her recusal, nothing in the rule compels it. The rule does, though, allow parties to ask successor judges to reconsider rulings the disqualified judge *960made. Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(h) ("Prior factual or legal rulings by a disqualified judge may be reconsidered and vacated or amended by a successor judge based upon a motion for reconsideration ...."); *see also**Buckner v. Cowling* , 135 So.3d 383 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) ("Although an order entered by a judge who is later disqualified is subject to reconsideration by a successor judge, a party is not entitled to have the order vacated as a matter of right."). Here, Williams never filed a motion for reconsideration challenging any of Judge Bell's rulings. Nor did Williams ever identify the pre-recusal conflict he asserts Judge Bell might have had.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
# Secretary Carlos Del Toro Released the Following Thanksgiving Message to the Force

#### 22 Nov 2023

Happy Thanksgiving to the Navy-Marine Corps Team of Sailors, Marines, civilian employees, and families.

This holiday encourages us to take stock of and reflect on all that we have to be grateful for.  For me, doing so is simple:  I am forever grateful for the honor to serve as your Secretary of the Navy.  You stand the watch in support of one another and in defense of our Nation.  I could not be more proud of all that you accomplish.  Please accept my profound and humble thanks.

A very special thank you goes out to our teammates deployed and underway.  While you may not be able to gather at the table with your families this year, please know that the Nation's thoughts, prayers, and thanks are with you, wherever you find yourselves.

Please check in and say thanks to one another and your families during this Thanksgiving weekend.  Let them know you care and that you are grateful for them, as I am grateful for each of you.

Thank you for everything you do.  Happy Thanksgiving.

Released by the Honorable Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

GENEVA RUSSELL, : Case No. 3:18-cv-264
Plaintiff, : District Judge Walter H. Rice
: Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of
Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
(Doc. #20). Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees
in the amount of $4,406.00, and no costs in full satisfaction and settlement of any and
all claims Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. Prior to Plaintiff
filing an EAJA petition, the parties jointly reached a resolution to settle EAJA fees in
this case. Their Stipulation represents a compromise on disputed positions and is not
intended to set precedent for, or a representation of, any specific hourly rate or total
number of hours.

The award of attorney fees will satisfy all of Plaintiff's claims for fees, costs, and
expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and

not her attorney, can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the


United States under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010).

After the Court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that
Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the
award be made payable to Plaintiffs attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly
signed by Plaintiff.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The Parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees
under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #20) is accepted
and Defendant shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees, costs, and
expenses in the total amount of $4,406.00;

2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this
Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-
existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such
pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award
directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment
signed by Plaintiff; and

3t The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IAABAV Aan we.

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, W. Phillip Marcum, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
             of the Company.



                                            /s/  W. Phillip Marcum
                                            ---------------------------------


                                            W. Phillip Marcum
                                            President and Chief
                                            Executive Officer
                                            May 14, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                                                  |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   |                                                  |
| Date:  November 25, 2015 |   | /s/ Shannon Masjedi                                   |
|                          |   | Shannon Masjedi                                       |
|                          |   | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
FOIA Requested Record #J-12-0079 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 1 of 2

 

 

 

 

 

Record Posted to NGB Reading Room 

13 June 14
$K

APPN FY12 Enacted FY13 PB FY12 Enacted FY13 PB

NGPA $ 7,585,645.0 $ 8,103,207.0 $ - $ 12,430.0

OMNG $ 6,924,932.0 $ 7,108,612.0 $ 332,696.0 $ 307,097.0

Grand Tota $ 14,510,577.0 $ 15,211,819.0 $ 332,696.0 $ 319,527.0

Total Budget IT Budget

FOIA Requested Record #J-12-0079 

Released by National Guard Bureau 

Page 2 of 2

Record Posted to NGB Reading Room 

13 June 14
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-169660) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-170149) of our report dated March 11, 2011 relating to our audits of consolidated financial statements, the financial statement schedules, and  internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Sky One Medical, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such registration statements.





/s/ MSPCCertified Public Accountants and Advisors,A Professional CorporationNew York, New YorkMarch 11, 2011
2023 BENCH APPLICANT COVER SHEET

RANK: NAME: STATE:

DOR: AGE: GOL MRD: COMPONENT:

CURRENT DUTY TITLE/POSITION:

BRANCH/AFSC:

HIGHEST COMMAND LEVEL:

HIGHEST MILITARY EDUCATION:

HIGHEST CIVILIAN EDUCATION:

HIGHEST AWARD/LEVEL:

JOINT QUALIFICATION LEVEL:

TFCSD: COE EXPIRATION DATE:

INDISPENSABILITY:

TOUR TYPES: EAD: XXX M‐Day: XXX Dual‐Hat: XXX
Walter Lynn ROBERSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1015

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          27,830
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (36)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,226
<PP&E>                                          43,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                (26,688)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,747
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,722
<SALES>                                         25,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,963
<CGS>                                           21,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,160)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certifications**
I, Michael W. Patrick, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carmike Cinemas,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors:
  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
 

 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
March 30, 2004   /s/ Michael W. Patrick    Michael W. Patrick  President, Chief Executive Officer and  Chairman of the Board of Directors