alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Record of Meeting 

DATE: October 27, 2015 

EPA ATTENDEES: Wren Stenger, Guy Donaldson, Barbara Nann, Josh Olszewski, Dayana 

Medina 

VISITORS: Becky Keogh (ADEQ), Stuart Spencer (ADEQ), Steve Lorio (Entergy), Heather 

Naeher (Entergy), Kurt Castleberry (Entergy), Kelly McQueen (Entergy), Bill Bumpers (Baker 

& Botts) 

This meeting was in response to a request from the visitors for an opportunity to meet with EPA 

to go over the written comments submitted by Entergy during the public comment period on the 

proposed Arkansas Regional Haze FIP, and to answer any questions from EPA regarding the 

submitted comments. See “AR020.0166 Entergy Arkansas Inc. comments on EPA-R06-OAR2015-0189-0153,” which can be found in the docket for the Arkansas RH FIP rulemaking 

(Docket ID: EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0189). 

The topics discussed included the following: 

 Entergy’s alternative proposal with regard to White Bluff and Independence. 

 Entergy clarified that under the company’s alternative proposal, White Bluff Units 1 and 

2 would meet the interim SO2 emission limit of 0.6 lb/MMBtu and Independence Units 1 

and 2 would meet the SO2 emission limit of 0.6 lb/MMBtu by burning lower sulfur coal. 

 Entergy also discussed that due to changes in the dispatch of White Bluff and 

Independence, the company no longer expects the units to be able to consistently meet a 

NOx emission limit of 0.15 lb/MMBtu on a 30-day boiler operating day rolling average.
# Navy Closure Task Force-Red Hill: AFFF Update

## From Navy Closure Task Force-Red Hill 

More Details            Lt. Cmdr. Joseph Dyches, Deputy Operations Officer for Facilities, Navy Closure Task Force - Red Hill (NCTF-RH) explains spill containment procedures to an official from the Environmental Protection Agency at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility (RHBFSF), April 5, 2024. Charged with the safe decommissioning of the RHBFSF, NCTF-RH was established by the Department of the Navy as a commitment to the community and the environment. The Navy continues to engage with the people of Hawaii, regulatory agencies, and other stakeholders as NCTF-RH works to safely and deliberately decommission the RHBFSF. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Glenn Slaughter)                        Navy Explains Spill Containment Procedures at Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility                            Lt. Cmdr. Joseph Dyches, Deputy Operations Officer for Facilities, Navy Closure Task Force - Red Hill (NCTF-RH) explains spill containment procedures to an official from the Environmental Protection Agency at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility (RHBFSF), April 5, 2024. Charged with the safe decommissioning of the RHBFSF, NCTF-RH was established by the Department of the Navy as a commitment to the community and the environment. The Navy continues to engage with the people of Hawaii, regulatory agencies, and other stakeholders as NCTF-RH works to safely and deliberately decommission the RHBFSF. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Glenn Slaughter)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Petty Officer 1st Class Glenn SlaughterVIRIN: 240405-N-IS471-1118**For more information about NCTF-RH, visit navyclosuretaskforce.navy.mil or download the mobile app by searching for “NCTF-Red Hill” in the Apple App store or Google Play store. For imagery, video and other digital media please visit our DVIDS site here: https://www.dvidshub.net/unit/NCTF-RH.**
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Report and Recommendations

4/18/19

 Southern District of Ohio

Michael Pohl

3:18-CV-19

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant; case remanded to the commissioner under sentence

four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings

✔ Walter H. Rice
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 79 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury 

and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to ‘‘Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act; Updating Payment Parameters, 

Section 1332 Waiver Implementing Regulations, and Improving Health 

Insurance Markets for 2022 and Beyond’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2022 

Mr. CLOUD submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of the Treasury and the Centers for 

Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to ‘‘Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Updating Payment Parameters, Section 1332 Waiver Implementing Regulations, and Improving Health Insurance Markets for 2022 

and Beyond’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 79 IH 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De2 partment of the Treasury and the Centers for Medicare 

3 & Medicaid Services relating to ‘‘Patient Protection and 

4 Affordable Care Act; Updating Payment Parameters, Sec5 tion 1332 Waiver Implementing Regulations, and Improv6 ing Health Insurance Markets for 2022 and Beyond’’ (86 

7 Fed. Reg. 53412 (September 27, 2021)), and such rule 

8 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

(WESTERN DIVISION) 

ZOBELE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V., 

Plaintiff, 

-againstTSS TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Defendant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Case No: 1:18-cv-00596-SJD 

Judge Susan J. Dlott 

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman 

ORDER 

This Court grants the motion of Plaintiff Zobele Mexico, S.A. de C.V. for an Entry of 

Default Judgment against Defendant TSS Technologies Inc. under Rule 55(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. The 

Court finds that Defendant is in default and is liable for damages incurred as a result of breach of 

contract in the amount of $2,052,290.00, together with costs in the amount of $450.00 and 

prejudgment interest pursuant to R.C. 1343.03(A) in the amount of $65,120.74 for a total 

judgment of $2,117,860.74. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 S/Susan J. Dlott______________ 

 Judge Susan J. Dlott 

 United States District Court
| (1) |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of December 31, 2006 and for the periods then ended. |
|-----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                                                                            |                                             |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Date: April              16, 2007 |                                                                                       | /s/ Todd              A.              Oseth |
|                                   | Todd              A. Oseth, Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

----
| (1) |   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) |   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  as of December 31, 2005 and for the periods then ended. |
|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  April 7, 2006 | /s/                  John                  Jenkins                                                                                                                       John                  Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEETS  AND  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF
     OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
     QUARTER  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            6,781,453
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4,533,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                         786,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 12,349,204
<PP&E>                                            5,473,889
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (2,736,296)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19,385,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7,973,308
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                             704
<COMMON>                                              4,459
<OTHER-SE>                                        9,447,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19,385,577
<SALES>                                           3,458,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3,508,936
<CGS>                                             2,339,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12,363,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  249,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (18,926,044)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (4.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2



December 31, 2004



Mr. Alan B. Miller

President

UHS of Delaware, Inc.

367 South Gulph Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406



Dear Alan:



The Board of
Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust, at their December 1, 2004 meeting, authorized the renewal of the current Advisory Agreement between the Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (Agreement) upon the same terms and conditions.



This letter constitutes the Trusts offer to renew the
Agreement, until December 31, 2005, upon the same terms and conditions. Please acknowledge UHS of Delawares acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to me.



Sincerely,/s/ Charles F. BoyleVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller




|cc: | Warren J. Nimetz, Esq.
|--- | ----------------------

| | Cheryl K. Ramagano
| | ------------------



Agreed to and Accepted:



|                      |  |                   
|--------------------- |  | ------------------
|UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ Alan B. Miller
|                      |  | President
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15
- 6280

CREADELL HUBBARD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Glen E. Conrad , District Judge. ( 7:15

- cv
- 00002

- GEC

- RSB )

Submitted : December 21, 2018 Decided: January 10, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HARRIS , Circuit Judge , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Creadell Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Creadell Hubbard ap peals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The district court ruled that Hubbard’s challenge to his career
offender status w as not cognizable under § 2241 pursuant to In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328 (4th Cir. 2000). How ever, when it issued its decision, the district court did not have the
benefit of our decisions in United States v. Wheeler , 886 F.3d 415, 426 (4th Cir. 2018) , and Lester v. Flournoy , 909 F.3d 708 (4th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, vacate the district court’s order , and remand for further consideration of Hubbard’s petition, including any relevant jurisdictional issues. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. VACATED AND REMANDED
#### Pauline WOODS (PARRISH) *v.*James E. BARBER as Administrator of the Estate of S. W. WOODS, Deceased

73-189

504 S.W. 2d 355

Opinion delivered January 28, 1974

*Lee Ward,*for appellant.

*Frierson, Walker, Snellgrove & Laser,*by: G. *D. Walker,*for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant is the widow of S. W. Woods, who died intestate. Appellee is the duly qualified administrator of the estate of the deceased. The administrator filed his petition for final distribution and discharge. Among the listed disbursements was the payment of $7569.57 to the Mercantile Bank of Jonesboro. The widow filed an objection to the payment on the ground that no claim had been filed thereon, nor was any effort to foreclose any lien filed. The widow asked that the administrator be required to reimburse the estate in the amount of the payment to the bank. A hearing was conducted thereon and the probate court approved the payment “as payment of a proper debt against the estate to the bank secured by a lien on crops and equipment”. On appeal it is contended that the debt should not have been paid in the absence of the filing of a claim or any effort to foreclose the lien held by the bank. It should be noted that the bank is not a party to this case.

*928The record shows that the administrator was authorized to continue the decedent’s farming operation. In connection therewith he borrowed from the bank under a security agreement, and with the approval of the probate court, an additional sum of $6480 (in addition to what Woods owed at the time of his death) to continue the farming business. Of course in the sale of the crops the bank’s security interest became liquidated. The only thing left for the bank to do under those circumstances was to apply the proceeds, so far as necessary, to the satisfaction of its security interest and to release the balance thereof to the personal representative pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 62-2609 (b) (Repl. 1967). Under the circumstances the filing of a claim by the bank or any other legal proceeding was unnecessary.

While the witnesses spoke of payment of the debt, the practical effect was the same as if the bank had liquidated the security interest pursuant to § 62-2609 (b) and turned over the excess of the proceeds to the personal representative. Consequently the trial court correctly absolved the administrator of any liability.

Affirmed.

Harris, C.J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 28,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. Brown
 /s/ Phillip J. Smith
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee.

The meeting is devoted to the review and evaluation of journals for potential indexing by the National Library of Medicine and will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. Premature disclosure of the titles of the journals as potential titles to be indexed by the National Library of Medicine, the discussions, and the presence of individuals associated with these publications could significantly frustrate the review and evaluation of individual journals.

*Name of Committee:*                         Literature Selection Technical Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         June 23-24, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate journals as potential titles to be indexed by the National Library of Medicine.                    

*Place:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dianne Babski, Associate Director, Division of Library Operations, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Building 38, Room 4S404, Bethesda, MD 20894, 301-827-4729,                         *babskid@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: January 28, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-02128 Filed 2-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 605 

Providing for sufficient time for legislation to be read. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2020 

Mr. PAUL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for sufficient time for legislation to be read. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. TIME FOR READING OF LEGISLATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be in order for the 

4 Senate to consider any bill, resolution, message, con5 ference report, amendment between the Houses, amend6 ment, treaty, or other measure or matter until 1 session 

7 day has passed since introduction for every 20 pages in8 cluded in the measure or matter in the usual form plus 

9 1 session day for any number of remaining pages less than 

10 20 in the usual form. 

11 (b) POINT OF ORDER.— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 605 IS 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Any Senator may raise a 

2 point of order that consideration of any bill, resolu3 tion, message, conference report, amendment, treaty, 

4 or other measure or matter is not in order under 

5 subsection (a). A motion to table the point of order 

6 shall not be in order. 

7 (2) WAIVER.—Paragraph (1) may be waived or 

8 suspended only by an affirmative vote of three-fifths 

9 of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. All motions 

10 to waive under this paragraph shall be debatable col11 lectively for not to exceed 3 hours equally divided be12 tween the Senator raising the point of order and the 

13 Senator moving to waive the point of order or their 

14 designees. A motion to waive the point of order shall 

15 not be amendable. 

16 (c) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY.—This resolution 

17 is adopted pursuant to the power granted to each House 

18 of Congress to determine the Rules of its Proceedings in 

19 article I, section 5, clause 2 of the Constitution of the 

20 United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Otis GAMBLE III v. Willie Fred SMITH

2160068

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 17, 2017 Reh. denied February 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.