alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA
- 2010
- 1206 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 2009
-NM
- 216
- AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.
Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND CONSOLIDATED 
INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,062
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  372,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,600
<INVENTORY>                                     33,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               411,830
<PP&E>                                         658,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                 337,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,045,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,010
<BONDS>                                        591,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                     295,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,045,131
<SALES>                                        609,598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               609,598
<CGS>                                          233,142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                85,947
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (40,725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,911
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,636)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.99)
        

</TABLE>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05300

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05300\05300_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05300\05300_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05300\05300_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05300\05300_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05300\05300_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05300\05300_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05300\05300_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

05300\Supporting Documents\05300_GRE10629262-Aerial (2).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05300\Supporting Documents\05300_Water Balance Diagram Henderson Station.bmp.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05300\05300_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05300\05300_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         170,920
<SECURITIES>                                   168,798
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,463,497
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,561,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,483,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,483,648
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,065,631
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  789,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                169,887
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 27,376
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   142,511
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.07
        

</TABLE>
EX PARTE C.H. and D.H.

(In re: Department of Human Resources v. C.H. and D.H.)

2160243

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
EX-10.45






Exhibit 10.45




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is made effective November
19th, 2007, by and between Cardinal Health, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”), and Dwight
Winstead (the “Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement
originally dated August 23, 2004, as amended October 11, 2005 (the “Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have agreed to amend certain provisions of the
Agreement to bring the Agreement into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (Code”), and the treasury regulations and other guidance of general application
issued thereunder (“Code Section 409A”);



     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained,
and intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:



     1. Section 4(c)(i) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:



     “(i) pay to the Executive an amount equal to one times the sum of (x) the Executive’s Base
Salary, at the rate in effect on the day immediately prior to the Date of Termination and (y) the
Executive’s Annual Bonus target for the fiscal year of the Company in which the Date of Termination
occurs, such amount to be paid monthly in equal installments over the twelve (12) month period
immediately following the Date of Termination, provided, however, that to comply with Code Section
409A, the installment payments due during the first six months after the Executive’s Date of
Termination shall be accumulated and paid (with interest at the rate provided in Section
1274(b)(2)(B) of the Code) on the first day of the seventh month after the Date of Termination and
the balance of the installments shall be payable monthly thereafter; and”



     2. Section 4(c) is hereby further amended by the addition of the following at the end thereof:



     “For purposes of Section (i) above, the Date of Termination shall mean the date on which the
Executive has a “separation from service” within the meaning of Code Section 409A.”



     3. Except as specifically amended by the provisions of this Amendment, all terms of the
Agreement are unmodified and remain in full force and effect.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and, pursuant to the
authorization from its Board of Directors, the Company has caused these presents to be executed in
its name and on its behalf, all as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Dwight Winstead
 



	 	 
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Carole Watkins
 


	 	 
	Dwight Winstead
	 	 	 	Title: CHRO	 	 
	Execution Date: November 19th, 2007	 	 	 	Execution Date: December 20, 2007	 	 







2
John R. KEENAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3125

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1088 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1088

To direct the Secretary of Defense to implement certain recommendations 
regarding screening individuals who seek to enlist in the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

 Mr. Aguilar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to implement certain recommendations 
regarding screening individuals who seek to enlist in the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shielding our Military from 
Extremists Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING SCREENING 
              INDIVIDUALS WHO SEEK TO ENLIST IN THE ARMED FORCES.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement the seven recommendations 
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness on page 2 
of the report titled ``Screening Individuals Who Seek to Enlist in the 
Armed Forces'', submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
Senate and House of Representatives on October 14, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
**BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**WASHINGTON, D.C.**

___________________________ ) In The Matter of ) ) Docket No. OST

- 2013

- 0048 ) Agreement Adopted b y the ) Passenger Services Conference ) Of the International Air ) Transport Associ ation as ) Resolution 787 ) __________________________ )
**SURREPLY AND MOTION OF**  **THE TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OTHERWISE UNAUTHORIZED DOCUMENT**  The Travel Technology

Association (“Travel Tech ”) hereb y move s, pursuant to Section 302.6(c) of the Department’s Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. § 302.6(c), for leave to file this Surreply to the June 21, 2013 Reply of the International Air Transport Association (“IATA”). Travel Tech respectfull y submits that the Depa rtment should accept this Surrepl y because it will assist the Department’s understanding of the issues and help to ensure a complete and accurate record in the case. Travel Tech is the association representing online travel companies (OTCs) and global d istribution sy stems (GDSs). Travel Tech members connect consumers with travel suppliers, such as airlines, hotels, rental cars, cruises and others. Travel Tech’s members consolidate travel options from different travel providers, giving consumers and trav el agents, both online and brick

- and

- mortar, the ability to efficientl y research travel destinations and compare and purchase travel services. Travel Tech members also help travel sellers promote their services and destinations making consumers aware of t heir services and helping fill otherwise unoccupied airline seats and hotel rooms. Travel Tech and its members are deepl y concerned about the implications and impact of IA TA Resolution 787 , if approved b y the Department , and the risk it presents to the cu rrent pro consumer sy stem for airline distribution where consumers can shop anon ym ously to compare the full

- range of publicly

available fares on multiple airlines ,. As the man y filings in this docket, and especially

that of Open Allies for Airfare Transpa rency , have shown, IATA and its memberairlines have confirmed that the current transparent sy stem has constrained their ability to raise prices to consumers. Travel Tech thus endorses the S urrepl y submitted by Open Allies for Airfare Transparency

on Monda y, July

15 th and joins with thousands of other travel stakeholders in urging the Department to reject Resolution 787 in its entirety , so IATA can begin a more consultative process on a more pro - consumer future resolution that could thereafter be fil ed with DOT

. Travel Tech hereb y moves the Department to accept this Surreply , which provides information that will clarify the issues in this proceeding and develop a more complete record.

Respectfully

submitted,

Chris Chiames Chairman The Travel Technology

Association 1150 Connecticut Avenue, Suite 825 Washington, DC 200 36 202

- 870

- 8924 chris.chiames@orbitz.com
Date: July

16 , 2013
#### St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company *v.*Taylor.

4-2825

Opinion delivered January 23, 1933.

*E. T. Miller, E. L. Westbrooks, Jr.*and *E. L. West-brooke,*for appellant.

*A. F. Barham*and *Sam Rorex,*for appellee.

Humphreys, J.

Appellant filed an intervention in the case of Walter E. Taylor, State Bank Commissioner, v. Bank of Osceola, pending in the chancery court of Mississippi County, to have three cashier’s checks and a time certificate of deposit, issued to it by the Bank of Osceola before it closed its doors, declared preferred claims. It was alleged in the intervention that appellant purchased the cashier’s checks and certificate of deposit with currency, silver and checks its agent received in the course of its business, and, at the time, it was not a depositor in or indebted to said bank. It was also alleged in the intervention that the cashier’s checks were presented in due course to the First National Bank of Memphis, Tennessee, but were not honored because during the interim the Bank of Osceola had gone into liquidation.

A demurrer was filed to the intervention on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to show that the cashier’s checks and time certificate of deposit were preferred.

*826The demurrer was sustained to the intervention, and same was dismissed in so far as it prayed for a preference, hut the claims were allowed as general claims, from which is this appeal.

Appellant seeks a reversal of the decree denying its prayer for a priority or preference of its claims over those of general creditors on the ground that it was entitled to a preference under subdivision 7 of § 1 of act No. 107 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1927. The subdivision referred to applies only to collections made by a bank in which the relationship of principal and agent exists. The purchase of cashier’s checks and of time certificates of deposit creates a relationship of creditor and debtor. The instant case is governed by the interpretation placed upon said act in the cases of *Taylor*v. *Dermott Grocery & Commission Company,*185 Ark. 7, 45 S. W. (2d) 23, and *Missouri Pacific Railway Company*v. *Taylor,*185 Ark. 211, 46 S. W. (2d) 642.

No error appearing, the decree is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2


                 CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sharon Burd, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BrandPartners Group, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's   other  certifying  officer  and  I  am  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the  registrant's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
function):

      a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ Sharon Burd
-----------------------
Sharon Burd
Chief Financial Officer
Learn more at www.nationalguard.mil

Current as of August 2022 Point of Contact: NGB Public Affairs at (703) 607-2612

Highlights

Joint Information 

Exchange Environment 

(JIEE):

A web-based software application 

in use by the 50 states, three territories and the District of Columbia to support coordination and 

situational awareness of incidents 

and related missions, and mission 

coordination through tracking of 

requests for information (RFIs) 

and requests for assistance 

(RFAs).

Joint Incident Site Communications Capability 

(JISCC):

A deployable communications 

package that can be towed or 

airlifted to incident sites, providing 

reach-back connectivity via satellite and high-frequency radio to 

enable incident area voice, video 

and data services. The JISCC 

provides interoperable capabilities 

between a variety of radio communications equipment used by first 

responders and state and federal 

agencies. 

Joint C4 Coordination 

Center (JCCC):

An element of the NGCC that 

serves as the single point of 

contact for the coordination of 

the joint force command, control, 

communications and computer 

(C4) systems. The JCCC includes 

subject matter experts in planning, 

operations and system control. 

Providing reliable and timely flow of information 

to support mission needs

Mission:

The JCCSE is a joint U.S. Northern Command and National Guard 

Bureau effort that enables the reliable, timely flow of key information 

to support state and federal military activities - routine and otherwise - 

required for homeland defense, civil support and other mission needs. 

Overview: 

A major JCCSE element is the capability to link an incident site anywhere in the United States to state and national headquarters. 

The JCCSE involves organizational components such as the National Guard Coordination Center (NGCC), Joint Forces Headquarters-States Joint Operations Center, the Joint C4 Coordination Center 

(JCCC), and other technology infrastructure components. 

The JCCSE includes the organizational components, communications 

systems and programs that support connectivity, collaboration, situational awareness and coordination. The JCCSE also includes key 

capabilities: Joint Information Exchange Environment (JIEE), Joint 

Incident Site Communications Capability (JISCC), and the JCCC. 

2020: The Year of the Guard Joint Continental Communications 

Support Environment (JCCSE)
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

139027

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139027 COA: 282219 Oakland CC: 2007-214779-FC LOUIS GEORGE LAROSE, IV, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.