5832 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices 

Collection’s purpose, the Collection’s 

likely burden on the affected public, an 

explanation of the necessity of the 

Collection, and other important 

information describing the Collection. 

There is one ICR for each Collection. 

The Coast Guard invites comments on 

whether this ICR should be granted 

based on the Collection being necessary 

for the proper performance of 

Departmental functions. In particular, 

the Coast Guard would appreciate 

comments addressing: (1) The practical 

utility of the Collection; (2) the accuracy 

of the estimated burden of the 

Collection; (3) ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of 

information subject to the Collection; 

and (4) ways to minimize the burden of 

the Collection on respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

In response to your comments, we 

may revise this ICR or decide not to seek 

an extension of approval for the 

Collection. We will consider all 

comments and material received during 

the comment period. 

We encourage you to respond to this 

request by submitting comments and 

related materials. Comments must 

contain the OMB Control Number of the 

ICR and the docket number of this 

request, [USCG–2022–0045], and must 

be received by April 4, 2022. 

Submitting Comments 

We encourage you to submit 

comments through the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at https://

www.regulations.gov. If your material 

cannot be submitted using https://

www.regulations.gov, contact the person 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this document for 

alternate instructions. Documents 

mentioned in this notice, and all public 

comments, are in our online docket at 

https://www.regulations.gov and can be 

viewed by following that website’s 

instructions. Additionally, if you go to 

the online docket and sign up for email 

alerts, you will be notified when 

comments are posted. 

We accept anonymous comments. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to https://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. For more about privacy and 

submissions in response to this 

document, see DHS’s eRulemaking 

System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, 

March 11, 2020). 

Information Collection Request 

Title: Report of Marine Casualty & 

Chemical Testing of Commercial Vessel 

Personnel. 

OMB Control Number: 1625–0001. 

Summary: Marine casualty 

information is needed for CG 

investigations of commercial vessel 

casualties involving death, vessel 

damage, etc., as mandated by Congress. 

Chemical testing information is needed 

to improve CG detection/reduction of 

drug use by mariners. 

Need: Section 6101 of 46 U.S. Code, 

as delegated by the Secretary of 

Homeland Security to the Commandant, 

authorizes the Coast Guard to prescribe 

regulations for the reporting of marine 

casualties involving death, serious 

injury, material loss of property, 

material damage affecting the 

seaworthiness of a vessel, or significant 

harm to the environment. It also 

requires information on the use of 

alcohol be included in a marine casualty 

report. Section 7503 of 46 U.S.C. 

authorizes the Coast Guard to deny the 

issuance of licenses, certificates of 

registry, and merchant mariner’s 

documents (seaman’s papers) to users of 

dangerous drugs. Similarly, 46 U.S.C. 

7704 requires the Coast Guard to revoke 

such papers unless a holder provides 

satisfactory proofs that the holder has 

successfully completed a rehabilitation 

program acceptable to the U.S. Coast 

Guard and is determined to be, by a 

competent substance abuse professional, 

free from misuse of chemical substances 

and that the risk of subsequent misuse 

of chemical substances is sufficiently 

low to justify returning to safetysensitive positions. 

Forms: 

• CG–2692, Report of Marine 

Casualty, Commercial Diving Casualty, 

or OCS-related Casualty; 

• CG–2692A, Barge Addendum; 

• CG–2692B, Report of Mandatory 

Chemical Testing Following a Serious 

Marine Incident Involving Vessels in 

Commercial Service; 

• CG–2692C, Personnel Casualty 

Addendum; 

• CG–2692D, Involved Persons and 

Witnesses Addendum. 

Respondents: Vessel owners and 

operators. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated 

burden has decreased from 28,597 hours 

to 21,525 hours a year, due to a decrease 

in the estimated number of responses. 

Authority: The Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as 

amended. 

Dated: January 27, 2022. 

Kathleen Claffie, 

Chief, Office of Privacy Management, U.S. 

Coast Guard. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02120 Filed 2–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R8–ES–2021–N201; 

FXES11130800000–223–FF08E00000] 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Initiation of 5-Year Status 

Reviews of 40 Species in California, 

Nevada, and Oregon 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews; 

request for information. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, are initiating 5-year 

status reviews of 40 species in 

California, Nevada, and Oregon under 

the Endangered Species Act. A 5-year 

review is based on the best scientific 

and commercial data available at the 

time of the review; therefore, we are 

requesting submission of any new 

information on these species that has 

become available since the last review. 

DATES: To ensure consideration in our 

reviews, we are requesting submission 

of new information no later than April 

4, 2022. However, we will continue to 

accept new information about any 

species at any time. 

ADDRESSES: For how and where to send 

information and comments, see Request 

for New Information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bjorn Erickson at 916–414–6741. For 

whom to contact for species-specific 

information, see Request for New 

Information. Individuals who are 

hearing impaired or speech impaired 

may call the Federal Relay Service at 

800–877–8337 for TTY assistance. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Why do we conduct 5-year reviews? 

Under the Endangered Species Act of 

1973, as amended (Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531 

et seq.), we maintain lists of endangered 

and threatened wildlife and plant 

species (referred to as the List) in the 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 

CFR 17.11 (for wildlife) and 17.12 (for 

plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act 

requires us to review each listed 

species’ status at least once every 5 

years. For additional information about 

5-year reviews, refer to our factsheet at 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices 5833 

http://www.fws.gov/endangered/whatwe-do/recovery-overview.html. 

What information do we consider in 

our review? 

A 5-year review considers all new 

information available at the time of the 

review. In conducting these reviews, we 

consider the best scientific and 

commercial data that have become 

available since the listing determination 

or most recent status review, such as: 

(A) Species biology, including but not 

limited to population trends, 

distribution, abundance, demographics, 

and genetics; 

(B) Habitat conditions, including but 

not limited to amount, distribution, and 

suitability; 

(C) Conservation measures that have 

been implemented to benefit the 

species; 

(D) Threat status and trends in 

relation to the five listing factors (as 

defined in section 4(a)(1) of the Act); 

and 

(E) Other new information, data, or 

corrections, including but not limited to 

taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, 

identification of erroneous information 

contained in the List, and improved 

analytical methods. 

Any new information will be 

considered during the 5-year review and 

will also be useful in evaluating the 

ongoing recovery programs for the 

species. 

Which species are under review? 

This notice announces our active 

review of the species listed in the table 

below. 

Common name Scientific name Status 

States where 

species is 

known to occur 

Final listing rule 

(Federal Register citation 

and publication date) 

Lead fish and 

wildlife office 

Plants 

Buckwheat, steamboat .................. Eriogonum ovalifolium var. 

williamsiae.

E NV .................... 51 FR 24669; 7/7/ 

1986 

Reno. 

Ivesia, Webber’s ............................ Ivesia webberi ............................... T CA and NV ....... 79 FR 31878; 6/3/ 

2014 

Reno. 

Allocarya, Calistoga ...................... Plagiobothrys strictus ................... E CA .................... 62 FR 55791; 10/22/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Alopecurus, Sonoma ..................... Alopecurus aequalis var. 

sonomensis.

E CA ..................... 62 FR 55791; 10/22/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Bird’s beak, palmate-bracted ........ Cordylanthus palmatus ................. E CA ..................... 51 FR 23765; 7/1/ 

1986 

Sacramento. 

Bluegrass, Napa ............................ Poa napensis ................................ E CA ..................... 62 FR 55791; 10/22/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Clover, showy Indian ..................... Trifolium amoenum ....................... E CA ..................... 62 FR 55791; 10/22/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Goldfields, Contra Costa ............... Lasthenia conjugens ..................... E CA .................... 62 FR 33029; 6/18/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Grass, Colusa ............................... Neostapfia colusana ..................... T CA .................... 62 FR 14338; 3/26/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Grass, Solano ............................... Tuctoria mucronata ....................... E CA .................... 43 FR 44810; 9/28/ 

1978 

Sacramento. 

Lupine, clover ................................ Lupinus tidestromii ........................ E CA ..................... 57 FR 27848; 6/22/ 

1992 

Sacramento. 

Meadowfoam, Butte County .......... Limnanthes floccosa ssp. 

californica.

E CA .................... 57 FR 24192; 6/8/ 

1992 

Sacramento. 

Navarretia, few-flowered ............... Navarretia leucocephala ssp. 

pauciflora (=N. pauciflora).

E CA ..................... 62 FR 33029; 6/18/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Navarretia, many-flowered ............ Navarretia leucocephala ssp. 

plieantha.

E CA .................... 62 FR 33029; 6/18/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Orcutt grass, hairy ......................... Orcuttia pilosa ............................... E CA .................... 62 FR 14338; 3/26/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Orcutt grass, Sacramento ............. Orcuttia viscida ............................. E CA ..................... 62 FR 14338; 3/26/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Orcutt grass, San Joaquin ............ Orcuttia inaequalis ........................ T CA ..................... 62 FR 14338; 3/26/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Orcutt grass, slender ..................... Orcuttia tenuis .............................. T CA and OR ....... 62 FR 14338; 3/26/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Owl’s-clover, fleshy ....................... Castilleja campestris ssp. 

succulenta.

T CA ..................... 62 FR 14338; 3/26/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Spineflower, Sonoma .................... Chorizanthe valida ........................ E CA .................... 57 FR 27848; 6/22/ 

1992 

Sacramento. 

Spurge, Hoover’s .......................... Chamaesyce hooveri .................... T CA ..................... 62 FR 14338; 3/26/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Stonecrop, Lake County ............... Parvisedum leiocarpum ................ E CA .................... 62 FR 33029; 6/18/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Thistle, Loch Lomond coyote ........ Eryngium constancei .................... E CA .................... 51 FR 45904; 12/23/ 

1986 

Sacramento. 

Tuctoria, Greene’s ......................... Tuctoria greenei ............................ E CA .................... 62 FR 14338; 3/26/ 

1997 

Sacramento. 

Clarkia, Pismo ............................... Clarkia speciosa ssp. immaculata E CA .................... 59 FR 64613; 12/15/ 

1994 

Ventura. 

Cypress, Santa Cruz ..................... Cupressus abramsiana ................. T CA .................... 52 FR 675; 1/8/1987 Ventura. 

Dudleya, Conejo ............................ Dudleya abramsii ssp. parva ........ T CA ..................... 62 FR 4172; 1/29/ 

1997 

Ventura. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
5834 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices 

Common name Scientific name Status 

States where 

species is 

known to occur 

Final listing rule 

(Federal Register citation 

and publication date) 

Lead fish and 

wildlife office 

Dudleya, marcescent .................... Dudleya cymosa ssp. marcescens T CA .................... 62 FR 4172; 1/29/ 

1997 

Ventura. 

Dudleya, Verity’s ........................... Dudleya verityi .............................. T CA ..................... 62 FR 4172; 1/29/ 

1997 

Ventura. 

Malacothrix, island ........................ Malacothrix squalida ..................... E CA .................... 62 FR 40954; 7/31/ 

1997 

Ventura. 

Malacothrix, Santa Cruz Island ..... Malacothrix indecora .................... E CA ..................... 62 FR 40954; 7/31/ 

1997 

Ventura. 

Paintbrush, soft-leaved ................. Castilleja mollis ............................. E CA ..................... 62 FR 40954; 7/31/ 

1997 

Ventura. 

Seablite, California ........................ Suaeda californica ........................ E CA ..................... 59 FR 64613; 12/15/ 

1994 

Ventura. 

Spineflower, Robust ...................... Chorizanthe robusta var. robusta E CA .................... 59 FR 5499; 2/4/1994 Ventura. 

Thistle, Chorro Creek bog ............. Cirsium fontinale var. obispoense E CA ..................... 59 FR 64613; 12/15/ 

1994 

Ventura. 

Watercress, Gambel’s ................... Rorippa gambellii .......................... E CA .................... 58 FR 41378; 8/3/ 

1993 

Ventura. 

Animals 

Cui-ui ............................................. Chasmistes cujus ......................... E CA and NV ....... 32 FR 4001; 3/11/ 

1967 

Reno. 

Skipper, Carson wandering ........... Pseudocopaeodes eunus 

obscurus.

E CA and NV ....... 66 FR 59537; 11/29/ 

2001 

Reno. 

Trout, Lahontan cutthroat .............. Oncorhynchus clarkii henshawi .... T CA, NV, OR, 

and UT.

35 FR 16047; 10/13/ 

1970 

Reno. 

Toad, arroyo (=arroyo southwestern).Anaxyrus californicus .................... E CA .................... 59 FR 64859; 12/16/ 

1994 

Ventura. 

Request for New Information 

To ensure that a 5-year review is 

complete and based on the best 

available scientific and commercial 

information, we request new 

information from all sources. See what 

information do we consider in our 

review? for specific criteria. If you 

submit information, please support it 

with documentation such as maps, 

bibliographic references, methods used 

to gather and analyze the data, and/or 

copies of any pertinent publications, 

reports, or letters by knowledgeable 

sources. 

To get more information on a species, 

submit information on a species, or 

review information we receive, please 

use the contact information for the lead 

Fish and Wildlife Office for the species 

specified in the table above. 

• Reno Fish and Wildlife Office: 

Justin Barrett, 775–861–6338 (phone); 

RFWOmail@fws.gov (email); or 1340 

Financial Boulevard, Suite 234, Reno, 

NV 89502 (U.S. mail). 

• Sacramento Fish and Wildlife 

Office: Eric Tattersall, 916–414–6723 

(phone); fw8sfwocomments@fws.gov 

(email); or 2800 Cottage Way, Suite 

W2605, Sacramento, CA 95825 (U.S. 

mail). 

• Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office: 

Cat Darst, 805–644–1766 (phone); cat_

darst@fws.gov (email); or 2493 Portola 

Road, Suite B, Ventura CA 93003 (U.S. 

mail). 

Public Availability of Comments 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Authority 

This document is published under the 

authority of the Endangered Species Act 

of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 

seq.). 

Jill Russi, 

Acting Regional Director, California Great 

Basin Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02154 Filed 2–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R2–ES–2021–N215; 

FXES11130200000–223–FF02ENEH00] 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Initiation of 5-Year Status 

Reviews of 35 Species in the 

Southwest 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews; 

request for information. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, are conducting 5-year 

status reviews under the Endangered 

Species Act of 35 animal and plant 

species. A 5-year status review is based 

on the best scientific and commercial 

data available at the time of the review; 

therefore, we are requesting submission 

of any such information that has become 

available since the last review for the 

species. 

DATES: To ensure consideration, we are 

requesting submission of new 

information no later than March 4, 2022. 

However, we will continue to accept 

new information about any listed 

species at any time. 

ADDRESSES: For how to request or 

submit information, see Request for 

Information and How do I ask questions 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1