alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, 
during the One Hundred Seventeenth Congress the Speaker of the House 
and the Majority Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, 
acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the House 
and the Minority Leader of the

              

 Senate, may notify the Members of the House and the Senate, 
respectively, to assemble at a place outside the District of Columbia 
if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 4, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 8, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00120

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.A.G.C., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 00860 Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Pursuant to the parties’ “ Joint Motion to Abate Appeal Pending Mediation and Suspend

All Deadlines

, ” we ordered the appeal abated until July 7, 2014. We instructed appellant to file a motion to dismiss the appeal due to settlement, or if a settlement wa s not reached, a motion to reinstate the appeal after the July 7, 2014 deadline

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). On July 21, 2014, appellant filed a “Status Report on Abated Case” i nforming the Court that the parties reached a settlement agreement on June 19, 20 14. The parties had not yet been able to enter the subject order, but anticipated filing a joint motion to dismiss as soon as practicable. On September 3, 2014, appellant fi led a second “Status Report on Abated Case” in which she repeated the same information as above.

On September 11, 2014, we reinstated t he appeal on this Court’s docket and ordered appellant to file either a motion to dismiss the appeal or an updated statu s report no later than September 22 , 2014. On September 22, 2014, appellant filed a status report informing the Court

that an order drafted pursuant to the parties’ irrevocable settlement agreement is currently being reviewed by counsel and that t he partie s expect to file a joint motion to dismiss as soon as practicable

.

Appellant is ORDERED to file either a motion to dismiss the appeal or an updated status
report no later than October 23, 2014.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy

Rulemaking Title: Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products:

Supplemental Advance Notice of Pr oposed Rulemaking Regarding Energy

Conservation Standards for Three Types of Consumer Products

P laceholder page for:

Docket Number: CE-RM-93-801

FDMS Docket ID: EERE-2006-STD-0052



## Missing Comment Number OR1

RESERVED

NO DOCUMENT
Rochelle DRIESSEN, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1754

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 15, 2017

Following review of the response, it is ordered that appellee Emily C. Moises Day Training Center's motion to dismiss appeal is granted, and this appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal is a non-final, non-appealable order.

Appellant's motion for extension and/or enlargement of time to file an initial brief is hereby denied as moot.

EMAS, LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
Order entered December 11 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 01496
- CV
IN RE JANNET WALKER, Relator Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR
- 15
- 02217
- 3 

### O RDE R Before Justices Lang, Fillmore and Brown Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.
We DENY relator’s motion for emergency relief as moot. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08202**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 08202\08202_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### x 08202\08202_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 08202\08202_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 08202\08202_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 08202\08202_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08202\08202_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08202\08202_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 08202\Supporting Documents\08202_CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 08202\Supporting Documents\08202_FIGURE 4.1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08202\Supporting Documents\08202_FIGURE 4.2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08202\Supporting Documents\08202_FIGURE 4.3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          19,683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,683
<PP&E>                                           7,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,660,537
<BONDS>                                      2,653,828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           338
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,287,941)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,762
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               704,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (704,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                               3,843,422
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,547,738)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (16.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (16.32)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 123 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 123

       Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1437.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2022

 Ms. DeLauro submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the 
  Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
       Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1437.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of H.R. 1437, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall amend the title so as to read: ``Making further 
continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2023, and for other purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
     from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
     quarter ended July 4, 1999 and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1999
<CASH>                                             841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (737)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,922
<PP&E>                                          69,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (7,543)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,154
<BONDS>                                         82,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           126
<OTHER-SE>                                     (15,830)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,571
<SALES>                                         32,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,696
<CGS>                                           31,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (5,092)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,686)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.85)



</TABLE>
#### *In re*Anonymous Michigan Attorney,

No. 91704.

The motion to suppress or seal the record is also denied. Court of Appeals No. 140309.
exv10wxpyx1y






AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This is an amendment, dated March 31, 2009 (the “Amendment”), to the Employment Agreement,
dated December 28, 2007 and effective April 1, 2009 (the “Successive Agreement”), between SAGA
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the “Corporation”) and EDWARD K. CHRISTIAN (“Christian”).



     WHEREAS, the Corporation and Christian desire to amend (a) Section 5 of the Successive
Agreement to allow the elective deferral by Christian of annual salary to be paid by the
Corporation to Christian in accordance with the Successive Agreement and (b) Section 7 of the
Successive Agreement to make express reference to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer Annual
Incentive Plan for determination of Christian’s bonus.



     NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and covenants of the Successive Agreement, it
is hereby agreed as follows:



     Section 5 of the Successive Agreement is amended to add the following at the end of such
section:



“Upon written election by Christian delivered to the Corporation,
Christian may defer any or all of the annual salary payable to
Christian pursuant to this Section 5 during the Term. For deferral
of annual salary payable in calendar year 2009, Christian shall
provide written election of such deferral to the Corporation no
later than March 31, 2009. For deferral of annual salary payable in
any calendar year after 2009, Christian shall provide written
election of such deferral no later than December 31st of
the prior calendar year. Any election of deferral shall state the
amount of such deferral and the date or dates upon which such
deferred compensation shall be paid.”



     The first sentence of Section 7 of the Successive Agreement is amended in its entirety as
follows:



“In addition to the salary specified in paragraph 5 and the annual
increases specified in paragraph 6, Christian shall be eligible for
(a) stock options in such amounts as shall be approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Corporation from time to time, and (b)
bonuses in such amounts as shall be determined pursuant to the terms
of the Chief Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan of Saga
Communications, Inc., originally effective as of January 1, 2000 and
as amended effective as of January 1, 2005, or as otherwise
determined by the Compensation Committee of the Corporation in its
discretion based on the performance of the Corporation and the
accomplishment of objectives mutually established by the
Compensation Committee and Christian.”



 









 





     Except as expressly amended hereby, the Successive Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed
to be in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and
year first set forth.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	SAGA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Gary Stevens
 	 
	 	 	Gary Stevens 	 
	 	 	Chair, Compensation Committee 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                /s/ Edward K. Christian
 	 
	 	Edward K. Christian 	 
	 	 	 
	 




2
## I N T H E CO U R T O F CR I MI N A L A PP EA LS O F T E X AS N O . A P - 76,158
E X PA R T E E Z E K I E L J E FF E R SO N , A ppl i c a nt
ON APP LI CATI ON F ORA W RI T OF HABEAS CO RPUS CAUSE NO . W 1 9 9 - 8 1 9 0 7 - 0 6 I N THE 1 9 9 J UDI CI AL DI S TRI CT CO URT TH FRO M CO LLI N CO UN TY
P e r c u ria m. O P I N I O N Pur s uant t o t he pr ovi s i ons of A r t i cl e 11.07 of

t he Texas C ode of

C r i m i nal Pr oce dur e, t he cl er k of t he t r i al cour t t r ans m i t t ed t o t hi s C our t t hi s appl i ca t i on f ora w r i t of habe as corpus . Ex par t e Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 ( T ex. C r i m . A pp. 1967) . A

ppl i ca nt w as convi ct ed of enga gi ng i n or gani ze d cr i m i nal ac t i vi t yand s ent enc ed t o f i f t ee nyea r s ’ i m pr i s onm ent
. A ppl i ca nt cont ends , in te r

a lia , t h at h i s co un sel rend ered i n eff ecti v e assist an ce b ecau se h e fai l ed t o t i m ely fi l e a n o t i ce o f app eal or a m o t i o nfor a n ew t ri al, d esp i t e A

p p l i cant ’s exp ressed des i r e t o appe al hi s convi ct i on. T h e tr i al court h as d eter m i n ed t h at t ri al co un sel fai l ed t o t i m ely fi l e a n o t i ce o f app eal. W e f i nd, t her ef

or e, t hat A

ppl i ca nt i s ent i t l ed t o t he oppor t uni t y t o f i l e a n out
- of

- t i m e appea l of

t he2

j udgm ent of convi ct i on i n C aus e N o. W199- 81907- 06 f r om t he 199t hJudi ci al D i s t r i ct C our t of C o l l i nC o unt y . A

p p l i cant i s o rdered ret urned t o t h at t i m e at w h i ch h e m ayg i v e a w

ri t t enn o t i ce o f a p p e a l s o th at h e mayth e n , withth e a id o f c o un s e l, o b ta iname an in g fu l ap p e a l. A ll t ime lim its
s h a ll b e c a lc u late d

a s if th e s e nte n c e h a d

b e e nimp o s e d

o nth e d ate o nw

h ic hth e man d ate o f t h is C our t i s s ues . We hol d t ha t , s h o u l d A p pl i ca nt des i r e t o pr os ec ut e a n appe al , he m us t t ake af f i r m at i ve s t eps t o f

i l e aw r i t t en not i ce of a p p e a l i n t he t r i al cour t wi t hi n 30 days af t ert he
man d ate o f t h is C o urt issu e s.
D el i ver ed: June 3, 2009 D o N o t P u

b li sh
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 3: 1 CR053 

Plaintiff, Judge Walter H. Rice 

V. 

THURSTON LEWIS GOODJOHN, 

Defendant. 

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE 

Upon the United States' Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture and the Court's review of the 

record, the Court HEREBY FINDS THAT: 

On December 14, 2018, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, finding that 

the following property (the "subject property") had been forfeited to the United States under 18 

U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c): 

1. Smith & Wesson SD40 Pistol, .40 cal, Serial Number HEC7557; 

2. 14 rounds of ammunition further described as follows: 

a. 13 rounds of Federal ammunition; and 

b. 1 Component Federal ammunition. 

The Court found that the defendant had an interest in the subject property and directed the 

United States to seize the subject property and to give notice of its intent to forfeit the property. 

The United States gave electronic notice through the CM/ECF notification system of the 

Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture to counsel for the defendant, and the defendant did not 

object to the forfeiture. 

The United States published notice of this forfeiture action and of its intent to dispose of 

the subject property in accordance with the law on an official government internet site 

8
(www.forfeiture.gov) for at least 30 consecutive days, beginning on December 15, 2018. 

On October 9, 2018, the Court held the defendant's sentencing hearing and announced the 

forfeiture of the subject property. The Judgment establishes that the defendant shall forfeit the 

subject property to the United States. 

The United States did not send direct written notice of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture 

because there was no person who reasonably appeared to be a potential claimant with standing to 

contest the forfeiture of the subject property in the ancillary proceeding. 

No person or entity has filed a timely petition with the Court asserting any interest in the 

subject property or objecting to its proposed forfeiture. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

I. All right, title, and interest in the subject property is condemned and forfeited to the 

United States under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 246l(c), and no right, title, or interest 

shall remain in any other person or entity. 

2. The United States shall dispose of the subject property in accordance with the law. 

3. The United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose 

of enforcing this Final Order of Forfeiture. 

SO ORDERED: 

Dated:""i'/--1 ~\ <j 

WALTER H. RICE 

UNITED STA TES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2
Roy Lee SAMANIEGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3656

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Edward C. Hall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Aethlon Medical, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

                              /S/ EDWARD C. HALL
                              -------------------
                              EDWARD C. HALL
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         (PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER)