alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of MartenTransport, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best knowledge of the undersigned:

 

                                                (1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

                                                (2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

| Date: March 14, 2008 |   | /s/ Randolph L. Marten                 |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Randolph L. Marten                     |
|                      |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |   |                                   |
|                      |   |                                   |
|                      |   | /s/ James J. Hinnendael                |
|                      |   | James J. Hinnendael                    |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer                |

 

----
Exhibit 23 (ii)

 

To the Board of Directors

General Electric Capital Services, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (No. 33-7348) on Form S-3 of General Electric Capital Services, Inc.,of our report dated February 7, 2003, relating to the statement of financialposition of General Electric Capital Services, Inc. and consolidated affiliatesas of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of earnings,changes in share owners' equity and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2002, and related schedules, which reportappears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of General ElectricCapital Services, Inc. Our report refers to a change in the method of accountingin 2002 for goodwill and other intangible assets, and changes in the methods ofaccounting in 2001 for derivative instruments and hedging activities andimpairment of certain beneficial interests in securitized assets.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut

March 7, 2003
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement File Numbers 33-15777, 33-33966, 33-61286, 33-90490, 333-01885,
333-07519, 333-69597 and 333-69599. It should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the company subsequent to April 30, 2000 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

/s/ Arthur Anderson LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
July 27, 2000
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

MARY FARRIER,

Appellant,

vs.

GEORGE LEICHT, 

Appellee.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cv-539

Judge Timothy S. Black

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This Order of Dismissal arises in the context of a bankruptcy appeal. Appellant is 

the Debtor and Appellee is the Trustee in the underlying bankruptcy case. (Doc. 2-2).

On July 15, 2019, the Court ordered Appellant to show cause why this bankruptcy 

appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Doc. 3). On August 2, 2019, 

Appellant filed a reply stating that she had not filed—or, at least, had not intended to 

file—this bankruptcy appeal in this first place.

1,2

 (Doc. 6).

Based upon the foregoing, and absent any objection from Appellant, the Court 

DISMISSES this bankruptcy appeal for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 

8003(a)(2) (stating that “[a]n appellant’s failure to take any step other than the timely 

filing of a notice of appeal” is ground for the district court “to act as it considers 

 

1 More specifically, Appellant’s reply states as follows: “I never filed an Appeal in [the] United 

States District Court. I never paid a filing fee.” (Doc. 6 at 1).

2

Indeed, it appears that Appellant has decided to pursue her concerns, relating to the underlying 

bankruptcy case, in a separate civil action: Farrier v. Leicht, et al., No. 1:19-cv-588 (S.D. Ohio).
2

appropriate, including dismissing the [bankruptcy] appeal”); see also Link v. Wabash 

R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630–31 (1962) (stating that district courts have the inherent 

power to dismiss cases for lack of prosecution); Barclay v. U.S. Tr., Hackett, 106 F. 

App’x 293, 293 (6th Cir. 2004) (affirming the dismissal of a bankruptcy appeal where, as 

here, the appellant was indifferent to its timely prosecution).

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this bankruptcy appeal is 

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this 

Order on Appellant via certified mail, at the following mailing address: P.O. Box 19361, 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45219.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

10/17/2019 s/Timothy S. Black
#### Parrish *v.*Nelson.

4-2957

Opinion delivered January 9, 1933.

*I. M. Greer, A. B. Caplinger*and *June P. Wooten,*for appellant.

*Boy Nelson, J. J. Mardis*and *W. Leon Smith,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

This is a proceeding contesting the nomination of appellant for the office of State Senator. The case was tried in the circuit court, judgment rendered, and an appeal prosecuted to this court.

The appellant seeks to supersede the judgment of the circuit court until the case can he heard here on its merits.

This is not a contest for the office of State Senator, and is not a proceeding to contest the election of a State Senator, but it is a proceeding to contest the nomination in the Democratic primary.

This court would have no jurisdiction to try a contest for the office of State Senator, nor to determine who is elected to the Senate.

Section 11 of article 5 of the Constitution provides: “Each House shall appoint its own officers, and shall be the sole judge of the qualifications, returns, and elections of its own members.”

It will therefore be seen that under the Constitution the Senate is the sole judge of the election of its members. What we are to determine, and what we have a right to determine, is whether the appellant or appellee was entitled to the nomination.

*787If we determine that the appellee was entitled to the nomination, nnder the law the judgment operates as an ouster from office. This does not mean however that we decide who was elected, but it means only that we hold that the election is void.

The statute provides that when the judgment operates as an ouster, there will he a vacancy which must he filled according to law.

The Senate alone can determine who has been elected, and who may sit as a member of the Senate.

A supersedeas could therefore serve no purpose because we do not and cannot decide who is entitled to the office of State Senator. We simply decide the contest for the nomination, and, under the law, if a person is given a certificate of nomination, his name placed on the ticket, and he is elected, we have the jurisdiction to decide whether he was or was not entitled to the nomination, and if the court decides that he was not, and there has already been an election, the judgment of the court operates as an ouster. That is, it decides that his election was void because of a violation of the Primary Election Law.

Whether we issue a supersedeas or deny it, we cannot say who shall serve in the Senate, but the Senate itself is the sole judge of the election and qualification of its members.

The Senate may seat either the contestant or the contestee, or it may decline to seat either until the case is tried, but in no event could the court’s order deter- • mine who is entitled to the office of State Senator.

A supersedeas would be useless, and it is therefore denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7236

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DETRIA CARTER, a/k/a Tria , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Beckley

. David A. Faber , Senior District Judge. ( 5:17

- cr - 00113

- 2 )

Submitted : May 7, 2021 Decided: May 25, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge , WILKINSON , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Detria Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM:
Detria Carter appeals the district court’s order denyi ng relief on her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, compassionate release wa s not warranted. See United States
v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326 , 329

- 31 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny as moot Carter’s motion to expedite decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated October 6, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-206554) of Smart Trust, California
Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 3.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 6, 2015
**EXHIBIT 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-121940) pertaining to the Carmike Cinemas, Inc. 2004 Incentive Stock Plan, the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (No. 333-102765) pertaining to Carmike Cinemas, Inc. Non-Employee DirectorsLong-Term Stock Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-102764) pertainingto Carmike Cinemas, Inc. Employee and Consultant Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, and theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-85194) pertaining to Carmike Cinemas, Inc. 2002 StockPlan of our report dated March 3, 2003, except for the restatement for lease accounting asdescribed in the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on December 6, 2004, as to which the date is December6, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Carmike Cinemas,Inc. and subsidiaries for the year end December 31, 2002 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K),for the year ended December 31, 2004./s/ Ernst & Young LLPNovember 9, 2005Atlanta, Georgia
#### Ergonis v Auto Dyne Corporation,

No. 90749.

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. MCR 7.302(F)(1). Court of Appeals No. 133125.

Reconsideration denied November 25, 1991.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14263 and #14264]; [OKLAHOMA Disaster # OK-00091]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of OKLAHOMA dated 04/07/2015. *Incident:*
                         Tornadoes, Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         03/25/2015 through 03/26/2015.
 DATES: *Effective:*
                         04/07/2015. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/08/2015. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/07/2016.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Cleveland, Tulsa. *Contiguous Counties:* Oklahoma: Canadian, Creek, Grady, Mcclain, Oklahoma, Okmulgee, Osage, Pawnee, Pottawatomie, Rogers, Wagoner, Washington. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.813Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14263 C and for economic injury is 14264 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Oklahoma. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: April 7, 2015. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-08962 Filed 4-17-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                        6145000
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 13952000
<ALLOWANCES>                  (830000)
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              20775000
<PP&E>                        311720000
<DEPRECIATION>                (200306000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                142701000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         25352000
<BONDS>                       100000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      246000
<OTHER-SE>                    (26837000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  142701000
<SALES>                       15556000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              15556000
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 11801000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            3600000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               155000
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           155000
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  155000
<EPS-BASIC>                   .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .01



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882343
<NAME> 90BC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          89,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,899
<PP&E>                                       9,587,150
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,152,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,617,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,844
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,583,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,617,172
<SALES>                                        207,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,083
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,705
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,705
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 63 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed direct commercial 

sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of certain weaponry and munitions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2021 

Ms. OMAR (for herself, Ms. TLAIB, and Mr. MCGOVERN) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed direct 

commercial sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of 

certain weaponry and munitions. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of a license for the export with respect 

4 to any of the following transfers to the Kingdom of Saudi 

5 Arabia is prohibited: 

6 (1) The transfer of the following defense arti7 cles, described in license document DDTC 20–11, 

8 submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(c) of 

9 the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(c)) 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 63 IH 

1 on November 4, 2021: The proposed transfer of two 

2 hundred eighty (280) AIM–120C–7/C–8 Advanced 

3 Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) and 

4 five hundred ninety-six (596) LAU–128 Missile Rail 

5 Launchers (MRL); containers; weapon support and 

6 support equipment; spare and repair parts; U.S. 

7 Government and contractor engineering, technical 

8 and logistical support services; and other related ele9 ments of logistical and program support. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 719 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 719

Recognizing September 22, 2020, as ``National Voter Registration Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2020

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Blunt, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Bennet, Mr. 
 Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. Brown, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Coons, Ms. Cortez 
  Masto, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Heinrich, Ms. 
 Hirono, Mr. Jones, Mr. King, Mr. Markey, Mr. Merkley, Ms. Rosen, Ms. 
 Smith, Mr. Udall, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Reed) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing September 22, 2020, as ``National Voter Registration Day''.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes September 22, 2020, as ``National Voter 
        Registration Day''; and
            (2) encourages each voting-eligible citizen of the United 
        States--
                    (A) to register to vote;
                    (B) to verify with the appropriate State or local 
                election official that the name, address, and other 
                personal information on record is current; and
                    (C) to cast a ballot in the election if the voting-
                eligible citizen would like to do so.
                                 <all>
```
James RIVERS v. TESTAMENTARY TRUST OF Kate Frierson BOYD

2160226

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### Clarence WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 22066.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 2, 1965.

Clarence Williams, pro se.

H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for appellee.

*473Before WOODBURY * WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges.

*

 Of the First Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks relief under 28 U.S. C.A. § 2255. The record shows affirmatively that he intelligently and effectively waived counsel when he pleaded guilty in 1956. He was twice offered a lawyer and he twice stated that he did not want a lawyer. See McCaffrey v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 328 F.2d 606.

Affirmed.
Richard Lee BOYKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3153

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Richard Lee Boykins, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.