alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
THE NOTES THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         119,076
<SECURITIES>                                   291,286
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,846
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               455,463
<PP&E>                                          64,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 803,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,816
<BONDS>                                        287,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                     449,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   803,740
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,704
<CGS>                                           15,550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,254
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,913
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,341
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,341
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
United States Navy–Marine Corps

Court of Criminal Appeals

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Ricky K. NGO

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

No. 201800309

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.

Decided: 25 January 2019

_________________________

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Emily A Jackson-Hall, USMC

Approved Sentence: Reduction to E-1, confinement for six months,1

and a bad-conduct discharge. Sentence adjudged 16 July 2018 by a 

special court-martial convened at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina,

consisting of a military judge sitting alone.

For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

 

1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 120 days

pursuant to a pretrial agreement. 
United States v. Ngo, No. 201800309

2

Before FULTON, HITESMAN, and ATTANASIO,

Appellate Military Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are 

correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s 

substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 

859(a), 866(c). 

The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are 

AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             824
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,691)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,738
<PP&E>                                          18,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,186)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,487
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        22,083
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,533
<SALES>                                         95,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,183
<CGS>                                           75,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                       991
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

Plaintiff,

v.

Andrey Shuklin, et al.,

Defendants. Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18CR109

Judge Black

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Now comes attorney, Stephanie F. Kessler, and respectfully enters her appearance 

as co-counsel with Martin S. Pinales and Eric G. Eckes for Defendant, Andrey Shuklin, in 

the above-captioned case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Stephanie F. Kessler

STEPHANIE F. KESSLER (0092338)

Pinales, Stachler, Young & Burrell Co., LPA

455 Delta Ave., Suite 105

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 252-2723

(513) 252-2751

skessler@pinalesstachler.com

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 100 Filed: 04/23/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 576
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via this 

Court’s electronic filing system on all counsel of record on this 23rd day of April, 2019.

/s/ Stephanie F. Kessler

STEPHANIE F. KESSLER (0092338)

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 100 Filed: 04/23/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 577
Exhibit 10.15





Exhibit 10.15





November 3, 2008



CONFIDENTIAL




Michael I. Schaffer, Ph.D.

c/o Psychemedics Corporation

5832 Uplander Way

Culver City, CA 90230-6608




Dear Mike:



This letter sets forth an amendment to the letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) between
you and Psychemedics Corporation (the “Company”) dated July 10, 2008. The Letter Agreement is
hereby amended by adding after paragraph 13 thereof the following paragraph 14:




	 	14.	 	Section 409A.






(a) Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, if at the time of your
separation from service within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder (the “Code”), following a Change in Control
as defined in paragraph 13(b) above, you are a “specified employee” within the meaning of
Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, then to the extent any payment or benefit that you
become entitled to under this Agreement would be considered deferred compensation subject to
the twenty percent (20%) additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A(a) of the Code as a
result of the application of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, such payment shall not be
payable and such benefit shall not be provided until the date that is the earlier of (i) six
(6) months and one (1) day after your separation from service, or (ii) your death.


 


 









 





Michael I. Schaffer, Ph.D.

November 3, 2008

Page 2





(b) This Agreement is intended to be in compliance with the provisions of Section 409A
of the Code. To the extent that any provision of this Agreement is ambiguous as to its
compliance with Section 409A of the Code, the provision
shall be read in such a manner so that all payments hereunder comply with said Section.
The parties agree that this Agreement may be amended, as reasonably requested by either
party, and as may be necessary to fully comply with Section 409A of the Code and all related
rules and regulations in order to preserve the payments and benefits provided hereunder
without additional cost to either party.




(c) Solely for the purposes of Section 409A of the Code, each installment payment of
Termination Pay shall be considered a separate payment.




(d) The Company makes no representation or warranty and shall have no liability to you
or any other person if any provisions of this Agreement are determined to constitute
deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code but do not satisfy an exemption
from, or the conditions of, said Section.



If this letter correctly sets forth our understanding and agreement concerning the proposed
amendment, please indicate your acceptance by signing both copies of this letter and returning one
copy. The Letter Agreement shall then be amended as set forth above but shall otherwise remain in
full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,


PSYCHEMEDICS CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	                                                    /s/ Raymond C. Kubacki, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



Agreed to: November 3, 2008





/s/ Michael I. Schaffer, Ph.D. 
Michael I. Schaffer, Ph.D.
Abram J. JORDAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3862

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 45 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 34 

[Report No. 117–64] 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 

relating to ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, 

Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2021 

Ms. DEGETTE (for herself, Mr. PETERS, Mr. LAMB, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. CASTEN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. 

CONNOLLY, Mr. COOPER, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. ESCOBAR, Mr. ESPAILLAT, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. KUSTER, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. NORTON, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. 

QUIGLEY, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. SIRES, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. WELCH, Mr. 

HASTINGS, Mr. LOWENTHAL, and Ms. LEE of California) submitted the 

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

JUNE 17, 2021 

Additional sponsors: Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. PORTER, Mr. PERLMUTTER, and 

Mrs. DINGELL

JUNE 17, 2021 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce; committed to the 

Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered 

to be printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 34 RH 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of a rule submitted by the 

Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Oil and 

Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Oil and Nat5 ural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Recon6 structed, and Modified Sources Review’’ (published at 85 

7 Fed. Reg. 57018 (September 14, 2020)), and such rule 

8 shall have no force or effect. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 45 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 34 

[Report No. 117–64] 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapModified Sources Review’’. Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Agency relating to ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector: submitted by the Environmental Protection ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of a rule 

JUNE 17, 2021 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Smalley *v.*Bushmiaer.

Opinion delivered May 19, 1930.

*G. M. W off or d,*for appellant.

*Part-ain S' Agee,*for appellee.

Humphreys, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered by the circuit court of Crawford County dismissing a petition for mandamus to compel appellee, the sheriff of said county, to allow the county cleric to inspect his jail record to ascertain the number of prisoners fed by him, so that he could audit the accounts of said sheriff in feeding the prisoners. The writ of mandamus was sought to enforce the provisions of act 367 of the Acts of the Legislature of 1929, which is as follows:

> “Be it Enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas:

> “Section 1. That, from and after the passage of this act, the sheriff of Crawford County, Arkansas, shall he allowed seventy-five cents (75c) per day for the feeding’ of each prisoner confined in the Crawford County jail; and provided, further, that it shall be the duty of the county clerk of Crawford County, Arkansas, to keep a jail record of the names and number of all prisoners confined in said jail on file in his office, and shall file a certified list of the names and number of said prisoners confined in said jail daring the previous month with the county and probate judg'e, said list to be filed on the first day of each month in each year.

> *875“Section 2. All laws and parts of laws in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.”

The trial court ruled that the act was void ¡because the enactment thereof was prohibited by Amendment Number 17 to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas, which is as follows:

> “The General Assembly shall not pass any local or special act. This amendment shall not prohibit the repeal of any local .or special act.”

We think the trial court correctly adjudged that the act in question was in contravention of Amendment No. 17 inhibiting the passage of local or special legislation. In the case of *Webb*v. *Adams,*180 Ark. 713, this court said: “A law is special in a constitutional sense when, by force of an inherent limitation, it arbitrarily separates some person, place or thing from those upon which, but for such separation, it would Operate.” Citing the following authorities: 58 Atl. 571, 572; *L. R. & Ft. Smith Ry. Co.*v. *Hanniford,*49 Ark. 291, 5 S. W. 294; *Little Rock*v. *North Little Rock,*72 Ark. 195, 79 S. W. 785.

In 25 R. C. L. p. 834, paragraph 81, it is said: “And where a statute fixes the compensation of an officer in a particular locality upon a basis entirely different from that of all other persons filling like offices in the Sítate, it has been held not to be a general law, but within the constitutional prohibition against special legislation.”

The effect of the act was to arbitrarily separate the clerk and sheriff of Crawford County, and legislate with reference to their duties and fees upon a basis different from that of other clerks and sheriffs in the State.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Smith and MoHaney, JJ., dissent.
```
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT**

To the Board of Directors
New World Brands, Inc.

We have issued our report dated July 15, 2003 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of New World Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries (formerly known
as Oak Tree Medical Systems, Inc.) included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003, which is incorporated by reference in
the Registration Statement Forms S-8 dated April 23, 2002, May 16, 2002 and July
22, 2003. We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of the aforementioned report.

                                                         /s/ WISS & COMPANY, LLP

Livingston, New Jersey
August 29, 2003
```
#### Michigan Microtech, Inc v Federated Publications, Inc,

No. 90920;

reported below: 187 Mich App 178.
Sharon PALACIOS, Appellant, v. April FLEMING, Appellee.

No. 1D17-986

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2018

Eric S. Block, Fraz Ahmed, and Caitlin E. O'Donnell of the Law Offices of Eric S. Block, PLLC, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Rhonda B. Boggess of Taylor, Day, Grimm & Boyd, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Ray, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

























CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Flanders Corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, we hereby certify, solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: September 15, 2006
      
      
      /s/Steven K. Clark
      
      Steven K. Clark
      President and Chief Executive Officer
      
      /s/John W. Hodson
      
      John W. Hodson
      Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 105 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 105

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
  Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 
Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status 
            for the Southern Distinct Population Segment''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 21, 2022

 Mr. Mann (for himself, Mr. Estes, Mr. LaTurner, Mr. Mullin, Mrs. Bice 
 of Oklahoma, and Mr. Lucas) submitted the following joint resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
  Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 
Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status 
            for the Southern Distinct Population Segment''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 
Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) Rule for 
the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status for the 
Southern Distinct Population Segment'' (87 Fed. Reg. 72674 (November 
25, 2022)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1128 

To allow expensing of amounts paid to move business property from China 

to the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2021 

Mr. GREEN of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To allow expensing of amounts paid to move business property from China to the United States, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPENSING OF AMOUNTS PAID TO MOVE BUSI4 NESS PROPERTY FROM CHINA TO THE 

5 UNITED STATES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury (or 

7 the Secretary’s delegate) shall establish a program under 

8 which amounts paid by a United States person (as defined 

9 in section 7701(a)(30)) to move inventory and equipment 

10 and supplies used in a trade or business of the taxpayer 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1128 IH

1 from China to the United States are allowed as a deduc2 tion in the taxable year in which paid by the taxpayer. 

3 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

4 (or the Secretary’s delegate) shall issue regulations under 

5 the program carried out under subsection (a) that restrict 

6 the amounts that may be expensed under such program 

7 to business moving expenses (within the meaning of the 

8 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the regulations and 

9 guidance issued thereunder). 

10 (c) EXPENSING PAID FOR WITH TARIFFS COL11 LECTED FROM CHINA.— 

12 (1) ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUST FUND.—There 

13 is established in the Treasury of the United States 

14 a trust fund consisting of such amounts as are ap15 propriated to such trust fund under paragraph (2). 

16 (2) APPROPRIATIONS TO TRUST FUND.—There 

17 are hereby appropriated to such trust fund amounts 

18 equivalent to the tariffs collected by the United 

19 States on goods manufactured in China. 

20 (3) APPROPRIATIONS FROM TRUST FUND.— 

21 There are hereby appropriated from such trust fund 

22 to the General Fund of the Treasury amounts equiv23 alent to the reduction in revenue to such General 

24 Fund by reason of subsection (a). 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1128 IH

1 (4) TIMING OF TRANSFERS, ETC.—Rules simi2 lar to the rules of section 9601 of the Internal Rev3 enue Code of 1986 shall apply with respect to appro4 priations to and from such trust fund under para5 graphs (2) and (3). 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
Joshua D. JNMARIE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3880

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.