alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ascential Software Corporation We consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of Ascential
Software Corporation, (Nos. 333-98925, 333-87396, 333-01409, 333-31369, 33-31371, 333-61843,
333-70323, 333-89231, 333-31670, 333-43238, 333-108782 and
333-110970) on Forms S-8 and (Nos.
333-90667, 333-00273) on Forms S-3 of Ascential Software Corporation of our report dated January 29,
2003 with respect to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows of Ascential Software Corporation and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002,
which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Ascential Software
Corporation. Our report refers to the Companys adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No.
142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002. /s/ KPMG LLP Boston, Massachusetts
March 16, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 4, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-04-1998
<CASH>                                       9,681,134
<SECURITIES>                                   221,615
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,864,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                   281,785
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,896,613
<PP&E>                                     177,978,337
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,027,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             290,526,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,487,477
<BONDS>                                    129,435,493
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 107,633,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               290,526,729
<SALES>                                     56,749,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            59,191,331
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,792,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,563,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,898,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,522,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,376,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (1,066,466)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,309,902
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 3, 2022.

PLACE:  The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: January 27, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-02063 Filed 1-27-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000799166
<NAME> MASSBANK CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,038
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,033
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               148,207
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                30,793
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    418,126
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             354
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               354
<LOANS>                                        304,989
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (2,450)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 946,625
<DEPOSITS>                                     824,031
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,438
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,042
<LONG-TERM>                                        625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,384
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 946,625
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 21,434
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               29,625
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 8,775
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                59,834
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              34,320
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,320
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,514
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      193
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,893
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,396
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      17,396
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.97
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.81
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,004
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,004
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,334
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (103)
<RECOVERIES>                                        26
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,450
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,966
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            484
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB  Reliant Home Warranty
Corporation  (the Company) for the quarter ended June30,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Kevin
Hamilton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herby certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, to the best of his/her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Kevin Hamilton

-------------------------------------
Kevin Hamilton
Chief Executive Officer

Aug 15, 2005

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Alberto R. Santa Ines, Chief Financial Officer of Abaxis, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the Report.
 
 Dated: November 9, 2010
 
 By:
/s/ Alberto R. Santa InesAlberto R. Santa InesChief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance
 
 This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  The certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Abaxis, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in any such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000798539                
<NAME>                        Power Cell, Inc.                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,117
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,117
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,948
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,569,553
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,117
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               11,787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (28,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (28,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 18, 2019

p0911

Order 

Clerk

September 18, 2019

159284

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159284

COA: 346736

Kalamazoo CC: 15-001304-FC

DALE EDWARD BUSH,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2019 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882692
<NAME> MIDISOFT CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           63000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1410000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    796000
<INVENTORY>                                     886000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1965000
<PP&E>                                         1028000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  660000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2634000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1316000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     540000
<COMMON>                                      19308000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2634000
<SALES>                                         537000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                537000
<CGS>                                           327000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1515000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (972000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (972000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALEJANDRO OCHOA-ROCHA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10282

D.C. No. 2:01-CR-00324-SRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Alejandro Ochoa-Rocha appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm. 

Ochoa-Rocha contends that the district court improperly relied on factors

FILED

JUN 17 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10282

under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A), such as the need to reflect the seriousness of the

revocation offense, to justify its sentence. The record indicates that the district

court properly considered the factors enumerated at 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). See

United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007) (revocation

sentence may not be based primarily on severity of revocation offense, but court

may consider the violator’s criminal history, including the violation offense, in its

section 3583(e) analysis). Furthermore, although Ochoa-Rocha’s 24-month

sentence represents a significant departure from the recommended sentence range,

we cannot say that the sentence was substantively unreasonable on the record here. 

See id. at 1063 (where defendant violates supervised release by committing same

offense for which he was placed on supervised release, “greater sanctions may be

required to deter future criminal activity”); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984,

993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
#### Dale Gene BRYANT v. A. L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

CR 85-170

705 S.W.2d 9

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 3, 1986

Appellant, *pro se.*

*Steve Clark,*Att’y Gen., by: *Jerome T. Kearney,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

David Newbern, Justice.

This appeal comes to us on a *pro se*brief by the appellant. No abstract of the record was presented by the appellant, or by the Arkansas Attorney General on behalf of the appellee.

From the appellant’s statement of the facts, the appellee’s brief, and mostly from the record, we are able to glean that the appellant asked the Jefferson County Circuit Court to order A. L. Lockhart, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction, to *303change prison records to show the appellant is serving a five-year, rather than ten-year, sentence. The appellant’s complaint seems to be that the Conway County Circuit Court entered judgments and commitment orders on some counts of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver after the case had been appealed to and affirmed by the Arkansas Court of Appeals. Apparently a jury verdict recommended sentences ranging from five to ten years on a number of counts but, through oversight, the judge only entered one commitment order for five years. The court of appeals, assuming incorrectly that the trial court had committed the appellant to a concurrent five-year sentence on each count, affirmed the judgment. Thereafter, the judge entered the other commitment orders, on the other counts of which the appellant had been found guilty by the jury. One of the orders was for a ten-year sentence. All of them were to run concurrently. The appellee argues the trial court was only correcting a clerical error. The appellant argues the trial judge was performing a judicial act in a case of which he lost jurisdiction when it went on appeal.

We hold *pro se*litigants to the abstracting requirement of Rule 9 of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. *Walker*v. *State,*283 Ark. 339, 676 S.W.2d 460 (1984). While we are more lenient *toprose*appellants, *Weston*v. *State,*265 Ark. 58, 576 S.W.2d 705 (1979), we will not entertain an appeal which completely ignores the requirement. This court consists of seven justices. There is only one record. We cannot continue to operate efficiently if each justice must look at the record to ascertain the facts. G. Smith, *Arkansas Appellate Practice: Abstracting the Record,*31 Ark. L. Rev. 359 (1977). We must, therefore, adhere to the abstracting requirement.

Affirmed.

Purtle, J., not participating.
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I, Richard E. Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: October 28, 2008 

 

 

21