alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Cain, Randy D." <RCAIN2@alleghenyenergy.com> To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Cannon, William E." <WCA NNON@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Lapcevic, Joseph P." <JLAPCEV@alleghenyene rgy.com> Date: 07/06/2010 11:45 AM Subject: Steam Electric Power Generating ICR - R. Paul Smith Power Station (09615) - Extension Request

July 6, 2010

Jezebele Alicea USEPA 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 4303TWashington, DC 20460 RE: Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines Allegheny Energy R. Paul Smith Station – Plant ID 09615

Dear Ms. Alicea: Allegheny Energy’s R. Paul Smit h Power Station received the EPA Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines on Friday, June 18, 2010. We have reviewed the ICR questionnaire (Version 2) and believe its breadth and depth of information require more time to complete. In accord with the instructions on the EPA cover lett er, Allegheny Energy respectfully requests an additional 30 days to provide responses. There are three reasons for this time extension request. First, R. Paul Smith Power Station just recently received a draft NPDES permit from MD MDE that is going to public hearing in late July. Preparation for this more immediate public hearing precludes Allegheny Energy and station staff from spending time preparing responses to the ELG ICR. In addition, Allegheny Energy initiated a merger with FirstEnergy of Akron, Ohio, on February 11, 2010. In order to support the merger and thoroughly explore the resulting synergies of the combined company numerous employees of Allegheny Energy were sent to Akron at the end of May for approximately a three month period. This has decreased an already lean staff to continue conducting business as usual in addition to responding to such inquiries as this ICR. Compounding the problem is potential attrition of Allegheny En ergy Corporate Services staff in anticipation of job loss associated with the combination of the two companies. Already, one key engineer that would have extensively worked on the ICR as left the company. Finally, the unprecedented issuance of a number of new regulatory proposals (e.g. CCRs, GHG MRR, GHG Ta iloring Rule), al ong with other ICRs (i.e. HAPs MACT and PCB) by EPA and state regulatory agencies has also added to the difficulty to provide thorough and meaningfulresponses by our limited staff. An additional 30 days would allow for Allegheny Energy and power station staffs to not only gather the necessary data required to support the ICR, but also would provide time to review the submittal for completeness and consistency. This additional 30 days in the response time will most likely lessen the need for further inquiry by EPA’s contractor (ERG) for purpose of explanation of the responses provided and possibly supplemental information request to aide clarification. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Randy Cain

Randy Cain Environmental Affairs Manager Allegheny Energy 800 Cabin Hill Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 phone: 724-838-6004 fax: 724-830-7711 e-mail: rcain2@alleghenyenergy.com
Jeffery Paul DUNNAVANT v. STATE

CR-15-1090

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs.

SETH NEZAT (12), 

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cr-109

Judge Timothy S. Black

ORDER OF REVOCATION AND DETENTION

This criminal case came before the Court on October 9, 2020 at 2:30 p.m. for a 

bond revocation hearing as to Defendant Seth Nezat. (Min. Entry, Oct. 9, 2020). 

As detailed in the Bond Violation Report, Defendant has continuously run afoul of 

his bond conditions in this case including, inter alia, failing to report changes in 

employment status, violating conditions of home detention and location monitoring, 

consuming alcohol, failing to participate in outpatient substance abuse treatment as 

instructed by the Pretrial Officer, and failing to report to and participate in inpatient 

alcohol treatment as ordered by this Court. (Doc. 154-1). 

Most recently, on June 5, 2020, the Court declined to revoke Defendant’s bond, on 

the condition that he self-report to an inpatient alcohol treatment facility, as arranged 

through the U.S. Pretrial Office, no later than June 8, 2020. (Id.; Min. Entry, Jun. 5, 

2020). On June 8, 2020, the Court was advised that Defendant arrived at the inpatient 

facility intoxicated, then left the facility, only to return twenty-minutes later with a bottle 

of alcohol. (Doc. 154-1 at 2). Defendant then left once again and went home before the 

police and EMT were able to arrive. (Id.) 

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 165 Filed: 10/09/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 855
2

At the October 9, 2020 hearing, Defendant admitted to the conduct as detailed in 

the bond violation report. Based upon Defendant’s admission of the violations, the Court 

finds by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant Nezat has violated the conditions 

of his pretrial release. Further, the Court finds that all efforts to address Defendant 

Nezat’s violations short of revocation have failed, and the seriousness of Defendant’s

conduct has only escalated. In light of Defendant’s repeated disregard of the bond 

conditions imposed, the Court finds that Defendant is unlikely to abide by any condition 

or combination of conditions of release. Moreover, based on recent behavior, including 

Defendant’s failures to remain in contact with his Pretrial Officer, as well as his location 

monitoring and home detention violations, and the escalating severity of Defendant’s 

alcohol use, the Court finds that no conditions or combination of conditions of release 

will ensure Defendant’s appearance, nor the safety of Defendant or the community. 

Accordingly, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(1)(B), (b)(2)(A) and (B), the Court 

REVOKES bond as to Defendant Seth Nezat and ORDERS that Defendant Nezat be

remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshals, to be DETAINED pending trial. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 10/9/2020 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 165 Filed: 10/09/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 856
DI9910 TRAVEL SERVICE (U.S.A.), INC. + 


We Service the World. 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: ::..rl 

On behalf ofNissin Travel Services, I am writing to express our strong support 

_,c- ____~~f(}!JlIe~l'lic!ltio!LO~Air 1iIle§JorIl~F nOJJ.§l()j>~~ice Q~tw~en Detroit and 

Haneda. 

Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where 

many corporations havecstrong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 

Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models rely 

on access to Japan and it's market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has created 

demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the convenience 

offlying into Tokyo'S downtown Haneda airport. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can 

support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong 

Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to 

Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit 

our business travelers. 

Thank you for consideration ofthis request. 

Nissin Travel Service (U.S.A.) Inc. 


Yasuo Kame6ka 


tl) . ./~c~ ~ager 

Birmingham Branch 

3000 RIVERCHASE GALLERIA-SUITE 790· BIRMINGHAM, AL 352M-TELEPHONE: (205) 739-0056' FAX: (205) 739-0054' 1-877-584-3939
Charles B. RIMMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3718

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 11, 2018

Charles B. Rimmer, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order summarily denying the defendant's Motion for Correction of Jail Credit. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener's error in the judgment and sentence in case number 2015-CF-52882, inasmuch as they incorrectly award 368, instead of 378, days of jail credit.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERROR.

COHEN, C.J., PALMER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Ventures Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter
ended September 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Shannon Masjedi, the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/
    Shannon Masjedi                                                                        | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Shannon
    Masjedi                                                                            | 
|President,
        Chief Executive Officer and
        Interim
        Chief Financial Officer | 



Date:
January 30, 2020



This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# VCNO Visits Defense Industry, Navy Leadership in Newport

### 21 Feb 2024

NEWPORT, R.I. – Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jim Kilby visited Newport, R.I., to meet with defense industry leaders at General Dynamics Electric Boat, Quonset Point and Navy leadership at Naval Station Newport, Feb. 20.

Kilby began his visit at Electric Boat’s Quonset Point facility, which works on the Navy’s major submarine components and a critical industry partner for the Navy’s submarine industrial base.

While at Quonset Point, Kilby received updates on the company’s work on the Navy’s Virginia-class fast-attack submarines and the Columbia-class ballistic-missile submarine to include engineering and design, construction, and overhauls and repairs.

Kilby also toured the tube and module outfitting facilities. Submarine hull cylinders completed at Quonset Point are transported to Electric Boat’s Groton facility or Huntington Ingalls-Newport News Shipbuilding in Newport News, Virginia, for completion.

The Columbia-class will replace the Ohio-class as the Navy’s contribution to the nuclear triad, which remains the most survivable leg of the U.S. strategic nuclear deterrent force.

“This is the future of our nation’s undersea dominance,” said Kilby. “We must deliver our submarines on time and on budget and we can’t do it without our industry partners, Congress and the immense support of the New England community.” 

During his time at Naval Station Newport, Kilby spoke to enlisted leadership attending the Senior Enlisted Academy, stressing the Chief of Naval Operation’s three priorities.

“As we look to the future, CNO is focusing us on three areas,” said Kilby. “First, Warfighting – improving our readiness and getting more players on the field to deliver decisive combat power at sea.  Second, Warfighters – because platforms don’t fight and win war...people do.  Third, Fortify the Foundation to build trust, align resources, and ensure that we’re ready for anything.”

The U.S. Navy Senior Enlisted Academy is a six-week leadership development program for active and reserve E-8 and E-9 personnel from the U.S. Navy, Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, National Guard, Space Force, as well as international service partners.

The SEA is the Navy's only professional military education institution dedicated to senior enlisted personnel, focusing on management, leadership, national security and physical fitness.

Naval Station Newport is home to 50 different commands and is the Navy’s premier site for training and educating officers, officer candidates, senior enlisted personnel and midshipman candidates into future leaders, as well as testing and evaluating advanced undersea warfare and development systems.
State of Wisconsin

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

101 S. Webster Street

Box 7921

Madison WI 53707-7921

March 16,2012

George Czerniak

Acting Division Director

Air & Radiation Division

77 W. Jackson Blvd (A-183)

Chicago IL 60604

Scott Walker, Governor

Cathy Stepp, Secretary

Telephone 608-266-2621

Toll Free 1-888-936-7463

TTY Access via relay· 711

WISCONSIN

DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Subject: Wisconsin State Implementation Plan Submittal for Greenhouse Gases

Dear Mr. Czerniak:

On May 4, 20 II Wisconsin DNR submitted a request to US EPA Region V to revise its State Implementation

Plan (S[P) to include new permit requirements relating to Greenhouse Gases. That submittal included pennanent

rules to:

• Define major source thresholds and significant emission increase levels;

• Establish global wanning potential factors to be used to calculate emissions on an equivalent and comparable

basis.

In that request, new permanent rules specific to implementing greenhouse gas requirements in Wisconsin's Title

V permitting program were also present. It was never Wisconsin DNR's intention to have these rules included in

its request to revise its S[P. With this letter Wisconsin DNR is requesting to withdraw the rules related to its Title

V program from its request to revise the SIP.

Specifically, Wisconsin DNR withdraws the following rules from its May 4, 2011 request:

• NR 407.02 (4) (b)(intro.)

• NR 407.02 (8m)

• Table 3 ofNR 407.05

• NR407.075

Questions regarding this request can be directed to Andrew Stewart of my staff at 608-266-6876 or

andrew.stewart@wisconsin.gov .

Sincerely,

cjJJ-.~~~--- Bart Sponseller, Director

Bureau of Air Management

Cc: Pat Stevens-AD/8

Andrew Stewart-AMl7

Ralph Patterson-AMl7

dnr.wi.gov

wisconsin.gov Naturally WISCONSIN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SHARON COLEMAN

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVOL, INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:18-cv-01706

Hon. Jorge L. Alonso

NOTICE OF AGREED STIPULATION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS 

PENDING JPML APPROVAL OF PROPOSED MULTIDISTRICT 

LITIGATION AND TRANSFER OF CASE

TO: Paul O. Otubusin

Otubusin & Associates, P.C.

77 West Washington Street, Suite 1204

Chicago, IL 60602

drotubusin@otubusinlaw.com

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 26, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as 

counsel may be heard, the undersigned shall appear before the Hon. Jorge Alonso in the Everett 

McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse and shall then and there present STIPULATION

AND ORDER TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING JPML APPROVAL OF 

PROPOSED MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION AND TRANSFER OF CASE, a copy of 

which has been served upon you.

Dated: April 20, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Maryanne C. Woo_________

Maryanne C. Woo (ARDC #6270844)

REED SMITH LLP

10 South Wacker Drive, 40th Floor

Chicago, IL 60606-7507

Telephone: (312) 207-1000

Facsimile: (312) 207-6400

Counsel for Defendant Davol Inc. 

Case: 2:18-cv-00781-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 19 Filed: 04/20/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 168
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Maryanne C. Woo, certify that on April 20, 2018, the NOTICE OF AGREED 

STIPULATION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING JPML APPROVAL OF 

PROPOSED MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION AND TRANSFER OF CASE was filed 

electronically with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send 

e-mail notification of such to:

Paul O. Otubusin

Otubusin & Associates, P.C.

77 West Washington Street, Suite 1204

Chicago, IL 60602

drotubusin@otubusinlaw.com

/s/ Maryanne C. Woo_________

Maryanne C. Woo (ARDC #6270844)

REED SMITH LLP

10 South Wacker Drive, 40th Floor

Chicago, IL 60606-7507

Telephone: (312) 207-1000

Facsimile: (312) 207-6400

Counsel for Defendant Davol Inc. 

Case: 2:18-cv-00781-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 19 Filed: 04/20/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 169
H. Lawrence PERRY and Perry & Young, P.A., Appellants, v. David SCHWANDNER and Helean Curry, Appellees.

No. 1D17-2665

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.3 to Electro-Sensors, Inc. Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2008







Exhibit 10.3


 


SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS


2008 FISCAL YEAR


 


Electro-Sensors, Inc. (the “Company”) currently does not have a written Board compensation plan. For the 2008 fiscal year, the Board determined that each of the Company’s non-employee directors would receive a cash retainer fee of $1,250 per quarter for their services on the Board.
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF            2002)**

 

I, C. Steven Guenthner, Chief Financial Officer of Almost Family, Inc.            (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act            of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the                            annual period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully                            complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities                            Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,                            in all material respects, the financial |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | condition and results of operations of the                            Company |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: March 12, 2008 | By   /s/ C.                            Steven Guenthner    |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | C. Steven Guenthner

Senior Vice President & Chief Financial

Officer |

 

 

A            signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the            Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and            Exchange Commission or its staff on request.

 

 

 

1
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 34 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 

relating to ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, 

Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2021 

Ms. DEGETTE (for herself, Mr. PETERS, Mr. LAMB, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. CASTEN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. 

CONNOLLY, Mr. COOPER, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. ESCOBAR, Mr. ESPAILLAT, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. KUSTER, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. NORTON, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. 

QUIGLEY, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. SIRES, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. WELCH, Mr. 

HASTINGS, Mr. LOWENTHAL, and Ms. LEE of California) submitted the 

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of a rule submitted by the 

Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Oil and 

Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Oil and NatVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:15 Mar 27, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ34.IH HJ34

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 34 IH 

1 ural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Recon2 structed, and Modified Sources Review’’ (published at 85 

3 Fed. Reg. 57018 (September 14, 2020)), and such rule 

4 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 10.15**

 

**Marten Transport, Ltd.**

 

**2010 Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary**

 

The Board of Directors of Marten Transport, Ltd.approved the following fee schedule for non-employee directors for fiscal year2010:

 
| Annual Board retainer                           |   | $      | 20,000 |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Lead Director                                   |   | 5,000  |   |
| Audit Committee chair                           |   | 15,000 |   |
| Compensation Committee chair                    |   | 7,500  |   |
| Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee chair |   | 2,500  |   |

 

The company generally pays non-employee directors afee of $1,000 for each Board meeting attended, $500 for each committee meetingattended, and reimburses them for out-of-pocket expenses of attending meetings.

 

Pursuant to the non-employee director option programadopted on March 1, 2006, which is similar to the program that wassuspended in 2004, each non-employee director will also receive an automaticgrant of an option to purchase 2,500 shares of common stock annually uponre-election to the Board by the stockholders. These options will be issued at a per share exercise price equal to thefair market value of one share of common stock on the grant date and expire tenyears from the grant date.

 

----