alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bowden *v.*Wilson.

4-8822

218 S. W. 2d 374

Opinion delivered March 21, 1949.

*Eugene Goffelt,*for appellant.

*Vol T. Lindsey,*for appellee.

Robins, J.

Appellees sought in the court below specific performance of a contract to convey a five-acre *829farm. From decree awarding the relief prayed comes this appeal.

Appellees owned a dwellinghou.se in Bentonville, and appellants were living on the farm, which had been originally conveyed to appellant, GL B>. Bowden. As a result of negotiations conducted by Hesse, a real estate agent, appellee, S. M. Wilson and appellant, G. R. Bow-den, entered into a written contract to exchange their respective properties and Wilson was to pay Bowden in addition the sum of $1,250. On May 12, 1948, these parties, with their wives, executed and acknowledged deeds in conformity with the agreement, but the deeds were never delivered, and remained in the custody of the Notary Public (secretary in the office of appellees’ attorney) at the time the suit was filed.

These defenses against appellees ’ action were urged: That the property of appellants constituted their homestead and the contract to convey it was not enforceable because appellant, Jennie A. Bowden, did not join in execution thereof; that the land belonged solely to Mrs. Bowden, it having previously been conveyed to her; and that there had been a material misrepresentation as to the quantity of the land to be conveyed by appellees.

The undisputed evidence showed that, whether the five-acre tract was owned by appellant, Gr. R. Bowden, or his wife, it was their homestead. Since appellant, Jennie A. Bowden, did not sign the contract of sale, this contract was under the provisions of § 50-415, Ark. Stats. (1947), void and unenforceable for any purpose. *Waters*v. *Hanley,*120 Ark. 465, 179 S. W. 817; *Ferrell*v. *Wood,*149 Ark. 376, 232 S. W. 577, 16 A. L. R. 1033; *Watson*v. *Poindexter,*176 Ark. 1065, 5 S. W. 2d 299; *Ramey*v. *Pyles,*182 Ark. 320, 31 S. W. 2d 533.

Nor can the deed executed by appellants and left with the Notary Public be held to be such a contract to sell the land as would entitle appellees to specific performance thereof, because delivery of same to appellees had never been made or authorized by appellants. All the testimony indicates that the deeds were merely left with the Notary Public for safekeeping and until such *830time as the interested parties *should meet*and consummate the trade, which was never done.

We held in the early case of *Johnson*v. *Craig,*21 Ark. 533, and also in the recent case of *Harris*v. *Dacus,*209 Ark. 1031, 193 S. W. 2d 1006, that a written contract to convey real estate, duly signed by the vendor, but not delivered to the vendee, will not support an action by the vendee for specific performance.

So here the appellees had no valid written contract for the conveyance of the land by appellants.

The lower court, therefore, erred in decreeing specific performance and the decree appealed from is accordingly reversed with directions to dismiss the complaint for want of equity.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of American  Telstar,  Inc.,  a Colorado
corporation  (the  "Company"),  on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned,  the Chief  Executive  Officer,  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Sec.  1350 as adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

(1)  the Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the  requirements
     of  Section  13(a) or (15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
     amended; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: October 20, 2010              By: /s/ Lisa Guise
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Lisa Guise
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,855,375
<SECURITIES>                                 6,417,066
<RECEIVABLES>                                  383,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,677,002
<PP&E>                                         799,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                 604,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,641,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,949,123
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,237
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,680,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,641,568
<SALES>                                        481,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,595,031
<CGS>                                           35,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  222,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,878,295
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (7,506,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,506,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                               2,712,701
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (325,120)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,118,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.67)
        

</TABLE>
#### Plunkett v City of Grand Ledge,

No. 91076;

Court of Appeals No. 121389.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

MACHELLE COLLINS, Case No. 1:18-cv-268

Plaintiff, Black, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY, REPORT AND

Defendant. RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion “for my SSDI case to move 

forward.” (Doc. 37). This is the third such motion filed by plaintiff to reopen her case. (See 

Docs. 31, 32). The history of this case and the reasons for recommending the denial of plaintiff’s

motions to reopen are set forth in the undersigned’s Reports and Recommendation of October 

19, 2021. (Doc. 33). For these same reasons, plaintiff’s instant motion “for my SSDI case to 

move forward” should be denied. 

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT:

1. Plaintiff’s motion “for my SSDI case to move forward” (Doc. 37) be DENIED.

2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an 

appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith 

and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to 

proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 

803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 

(6th Cir. 1997).

3. If the Report and Recommendation is adopted, plaintiff should be advised that if she 

wishes to obtain review of this Court’s Order, she must pursue an appeal to the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and not file any further post-judgment motions or 

Case: 1:18-cv-00268-TSB-KLL Doc #: 38 Filed: 12/27/22 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 178
2 

documents with this Court. 

Date:____________ _________________________ 

 Karen L. Litkovitz 

 Chief United States Magistrate Judge

12/23/2022

Case: 1:18-cv-00268-TSB-KLL Doc #: 38 Filed: 12/27/22 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 179
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

MACHELLE COLLINS, Case No. 1:18-cv-268

Plaintiff, Black, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written 

objections to this Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after 

being served with a copy thereof. That period may be extended further by the Court on timely 

motion by either side for an extension of time. All objections shall specify the portion(s) of the 

R&R objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the 

objections. A party shall respond to an opponent’s objections within FOURTEEN DAYS after 

being served with a copy of those objections. Failure to make objections in accordance with this 

procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States 

v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Case: 1:18-cv-00268-TSB-KLL Doc #: 38 Filed: 12/27/22 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 180
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 20, 2010 

s1213 

Order 

 

December 20, 2010 

141041 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141041 

 COA: 288999 

Allegan CC: 08-015728-FC 

KENNETH JAMES PHELPS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
               
<ARTICLE>               5
                                
<S>                                     <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                   413,697
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            578,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,035,195
<PP&E>                                27,699,041
<DEPRECIATION>                        18,694,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        12,555,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,854,566
<BONDS>                                3,309,190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                               2,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                             8,055,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          12,555,489
<SALES>                                5,099,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       5,461,590
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          2,086,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          66,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       341,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,296,410
<INCOME-TAX>                             192,748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,103,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,103,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              12.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                              12.33
                             

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**I, Jack H. Brown, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007/s/ Jack H. Brown
II 

Calendar No. 517 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1095 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 101 South Willowbrook Avenue in Compton, 

California, as the ‘‘PFC James Anderson, Jr., Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PFC JAMES ANDERSON, JR., POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 101 South Willowbrook Avenue 

7 in Compton, California, shall be known and designated as 

8 the ‘‘PFC James Anderson, Jr., Post Office Building’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1095 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘PFC James Anderson, 

5 Jr., Post Office Building’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 517 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1095 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostAnderson, Jr., Post Office Building’’. nue in Compton, California, as the ‘‘PFC James al Service located at 101 South Willowbrook AveSEPTEMBER 28, 2022 

Reported without amendment 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            28,370
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           20,367
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             20,014
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  48,737
<CASH>                                          17,825
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              69,896
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          13,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,986
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                135,573
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             50,566
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  16,833
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          (1,463)
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           35,380
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                         336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,986
<PREMIUMS>                                      23,806
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,278
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                (58)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     326
<BENEFITS>                                      19,953
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     11,142
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             9,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.93)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  74,151
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              7,753
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               12,200
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               3,142
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                18,950
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 72,012
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (9,073)
        

</TABLE>
COMMITTEE O N DON YOUNG NATU RA L RESO U RCES CONGRESS M AN F OR A LL A LASKA WASHINGTON OFF I C E : CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMITIEE ON

2314 RAYBURN BUILDING INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20515 202-225-5765 CO MMI TTE E O N TRAN SPORTATION & I NFRAST R U CTURE REP UBLICAN QIongr£ss of 

### Hfc**~ltitdt ~t** **zt te** **£j** POLI CY CO MMI TT EE**~llu$e** of**~ep .e.senhttwe** **5** ?Jt1C1sljington,**~.(tl.** 211515

October 6, 2014 Lauralyn (Laura) J, Remo DOT, Office ofAviation Analysis, Air Carrier Fitness Division, X-56 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington D.C. 20590
REF: DOT -OST-20l4-0l4S
Dear Ms. Remo:

I am writing in reference to Harris Air Application for a Certificate ofPublic Convenience and Necessity. Harris Air has been providing Alaska intra-state air since 1999 providing services between numerous communities in the Southeast Alaska region, including long-standing Essential Air Service (EAS) in one market.
As is common with any number ofAlaska intra-state Part 135 operators which have over the years applied for DOT inter-state Certificates but where the essential nature oftheir intra-state scheduled operations will actually remain unchanged after certification, there will similarly be no change in Harris Air's FAA Part-135-authorized intra-state scheduled operations. As set forth in its application, Harris Air's existing intra-state operations in this Southeast region ofAlaska will continue as currently operated. Harris Air has remained in good standing and provides a much needed service to Southeast Alaska. As the only Congressman in Alaska, I frequently must travel throughout the State utilizing air service as very few roads exist statewide. As I have always stated, the skies are our highways in Alaska and Harris Air has been a stalwart carrier that many Alaskans rely upon. Not only does the certification allow Harris Air to grow the market, but more importantly, will allow much better support and service to several communities within Southeast Alaska. This is a much needed and welcomed service for all ofthe Southeast communities for mail, medical transport, and supplies.
Due to the aforementioned reasons, I am asking that you carefully review the application and 

### award the Certificate as I believe that Harris Air has presented a very strong case for approval and will move forward with improving the transportation system in Southeast Alaska.

4241 B STREET 100 CUSHMAN STREET, SUITE 307 612 W. W,LLOUGHB Y AVEN U E, SUITE B 805 FR ON TAGE ROAD

SUITE 203 P.O. Box 73110 P.o. Bo x 21247 SUITE 110 VISIT OUR WEBSITE ANCHO RAGE, ALA SKA 99503 FAI RB A NKS, ALASKA 997 07 JUNEAU, ALASK A 99802 KEN A I , ALASKA 99611 CALL TO L L-FR EE HTIP :/I00N YOU NG

. H OU5E

. GOV 907-271

- 597 8 907-45&-0210 907-58&-7400 907-283-7701 1--B6&-99(}-5979Thank you for your time and consideration.