alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-46715, 33-50610, 33-50608, 33-50607, 333-
01409; and Form S-4 No. 333-143) and in the related Prospectuses of our
report dated February 3, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Informix Corporation included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                  /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
March 28, 1997
exhibit_101.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

     

    AMENDMENT

    TO

    RESTRICTED
STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT UNDER

    WALGREEN
CO. LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN

    


    WHEREAS,
Walgreen Co. previously issued restricted stock unit awards under the Walgreen
Co. Long-Term Performance Incentive Plan (the “RSU Agreements”);
and

     

    WHEREAS,
to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder, it is now deemed desirable to
amend the RSU Agreements applicable to employees who have attained or will
attain age 55 with at least 10 years of service before the calendar year in
which the vesting date specified in the RSU Agreement occurs.

     

    NOW,
THEREFORE, the outstanding RSU Agreements of employees who have or will attain
age 55 with at least 10 years of service before the calendar year in which the
vesting date specified in the introduction to the RSU Agreement occurs are
hereby amended, effective January 1, 2009, as follows:

     

    1. 
By adding the following new sentence to the end of Section 5 of the RSU
Agreement:

     

    “Any
Restricted Stock Units becoming vested by reason of the Employee’s death or
Disability shall be settled on the date of the Employee’s separation from
service (within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A), or as soon
as practicable thereafter, but in no event later than 90 days after such date;
provided, however, to the extent required under Code Section 409A, if the
Employee is a specified employee (within the meaning of Code Section 409A) at
the time payment is to be made, payment shall not be made until the date which
is six months after the Employee’s separation from service.”

     

    2. 
By adding the following new sentence to the end of Section 6 of the RSU
Agreement:

     

    “Any
Restricted Stock Units becoming vested by reason of the Employee’s Retirement
shall be settled on the date of the Employee’s separation from service (within
the meaning of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A), or as soon as practicable
thereafter, but in no event later than 90 days after such date; provided,
however, to the extent required under Code Section 409A, if the Employee is a
specified employee (within the meaning of Code Section 409A at the time payment
is to be made), payment shall not be made until the date which is six months
after the Employee’s separation from service.”

     

    3. 
By deleting the last sentence of Section 8 of the RSU Agreement and substituting
the following new sentence therefor:

     

    “If the
Change in Control is not also considered a change in control within the meaning
of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, then the Restricted Stock Units shall
become vested on the date of the Change in Control, but settlement shall not
occur until the earlier of the Participant’s separation from service (within the
meaning of Code Section 409A), or the vesting date indicated in the introduction
to the Agreement.”
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert M. Dutkowsky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Annual Report of J.D. Edwards & Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of J.D. Edwards & Company.





/s/    ROBERT M. DUTKOWSKYChairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**Certification      of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this                certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies                with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Exchange                Act; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                November 9, 2007 |                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                                                |
|                                   |                                                                                |
|                                   | By:                /s/ Alberto R. Santa Ines                                        |
|                                   | Alberto                R. Santa Ines                                                |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer and Vice President of                Finance |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, W. Phillip Marcum, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  November 12, 2004                 /s/  W. Phillip Marcum
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         W. Phillip Marcum
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Robert Burton Cook,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:18cv319

Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed 

by the Magistrate Judge on May 15, 2020 (Doc. 26). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file 

objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th 

Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 26) have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 26) of the Magistrate Judge is 

hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, 

Plaintiff counsel’s motion for an additional fee award (Doc. 24) is construed as arising 

under both 42 U.S.C. §§406(b) and 1383(d) and is GRANTED in part. Pursuant to 

the express terms of the Fee Agreement and the authority cited in the R&R, Plaintiff’s 

counsel is awarded the additional attorney’s fee of $3,962.50, which represents a total 

award of $7,862.50 for the 21.25 hours of work he performed in this Court less an offset 

Case: 1:18-cv-00319-MRB-SKB Doc #: 27 Filed: 06/01/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1349
2

for the EAJA fee award that counsel previously received.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge

United States District Court

Case: 1:18-cv-00319-MRB-SKB Doc #: 27 Filed: 06/01/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1350
Walter VEGA, DOC #T19345, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1260

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06981

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06981\06981_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06981\06981_Completeness_Checklist.xlsx EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06981\06981_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06981\06981_PartA.XLS Plant submitted survey file

06981\Certification Statement Plant ID_06981.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06981\Re Plant ID number 06981 .rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 12.3

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           I, Daniel Attias, as Chief Financial Officer, of Carmel Container
Systems Ltd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Form 20-F report for the period ending December
31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  June 20, 2003
                                             /s/  Daniel Attias
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Daniel Attias

                                             Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TODD BREWER WEEKS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ALBERT TUFONO; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-15982

D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00182-HG-BMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Helen Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Todd Brewer Weeks, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging 

due process, retaliation, and equal protection claims against state parole board

officials for denying him parole. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

FILED

JUL 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-15982

We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §§

1915A and 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000);

Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed all of Weeks’s claims because parole

board officials are entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity for decisions to

“grant, deny, or revoke parole,” which are “functionally comparable to tasks

performed by judges.” Swift v. California, 384 F.3d 1184, 1189 (9th Cir. 2004)

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 

The district court properly found that Weeks’s claims were also barred

because they were identical to claims that had been dismissed with prejudice in

another § 1983 action. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir.

1995) (dismissal appropriate where complaint “merely repeats pending or

previously litigated claims” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Weeks’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21

Carmike Cinemas, Inc.

List of Subsidiaries



|                                |  |                        |  |         |  
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------- | -
|Subsidiary                      |  | State of Incorporation |  | % Owned |  
|Eastwynn Theatres, Inc.         |  | Alabama                |  | 100     | %
|George G. Kerasotes Corporation |  | Delaware               |  | 100     | %
|GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc.      |  | Indiana                |  | 100     | %
|GKC Michigan Theatres, Inc.     |  | Delaware               |  | 100     | %
|GKC Theatres, Inc.              |  | Delaware               |  | 100     | %
|Military Services, Inc.         |  | Delaware               |  | 100     | %
Kenneth M. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3009

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30058 Conference Calendar

ROOSEVELT WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GLEN STEEB, DR.; KENNAN BUECHTER, DR.; THAI NGUYEN, DR.; VA MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-2040-S

-------------------- August 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roosevelt Williams, Jr. appeals the dismissal of his malpractice suit for failure to file a timely administrative claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Williams fails to brief the issue of timeliness, and it is deemed waived. See Hidden Oaks Ltd. v. City of Austin , 138 F.3d 1036, 1045 n.6 (5th Cir. 1998); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Williams’ appeal is dismissed. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.No. 99-30058 -2- APPEAL DISMISSED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF CHEMTRAK
INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         244,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  443,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    723,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,526,000
<PP&E>                                       1,282,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,874,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,122,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,874,000
<SALES>                                        823,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               845,000
<CGS>                                          851,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  851,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,789,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,096,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,096,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,096,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of United Retail Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), we, Raphael Benaroya, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and George R. Remeta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that based on our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                                                                           | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ RAPHAEL BENAROYARaphael Benaroya
Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 9, 2004/s/ GEORGE R. REMETAGeorge R. RemetaChief Financial Officer
September 9, 2004 |
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1027 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to establish an authority to issue permits 

to certain members of the Armed Forces who seek to carry concealed 

firearms while on military installations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2021 

Mr. STEUBE (for himself, Mr. CLOUD, and Mr. MULLIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to establish an authority 

to issue permits to certain members of the Armed Forces 

who seek to carry concealed firearms while on military 

installations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Bases Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PERMITS TO CARRY CONCEALED FIREARMS ON 

6 MILITARY INSTALLATIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1027 IH

1 shall establish a single element of the Department of De2 fense to issue, upon request by a covered member, a per3 mit that authorizes that covered member to carry a con4 cealed firearm while on any military installation. 

5 (b) COVERED MEMBER DEFINED.—In this section, 

6 the term ‘‘covered member’’ means a member of the 

7 Armed Forces who— 

8 (1) is not prohibited from purchasing, owning, 

9 or possessing a firearm under section 922 of title 

10 18, United States Code; and 

11 (2) is on active duty. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS