alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COMMISSIONERS 

GABRIEL J. RAMOS 

DlSTRlCT 1 

BRETT .A. KASTEN 

DISTRICT 2 

RON HALL 

DlSTRICT 3 

August 18, 2014 

Kevin Schlemmer, 

Chief, Essential Air Service & 

Domestic Analysis Division 

GRANT COUNTY 

United States Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Essential Air Service for Grant County, New Mexico 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

COUNTY MANAGER 

JON PAUL SAAR!. 

Telephone: (57 5) 5 74-0008 

Fax: (575} 574-0073 

I am writing in regard to the Essential Air Service (EAS) funding that is provided for our rural 

community. The EAS funding is vital to our community, and Grant County greatly appreciates 

the EAS assistance. 

Based on feedback from Grant County residents, our local hospital, and local officials, I believe 

that our community would benefit and prefer that there be a flight route from Silver City, NM to 

either Albuquerque or Santa Fe, NM. Currently, the flight to Phoenix is not very useful to a rural 

community such as ours, whose residents regularly need to travel to Northern New Mexico for 

governmental matters, economic opportunities, healthcare services, and for general quality of 

life. The flight to Phoenix, unfortunately, has failed to meet the needs of our isolated 

community. 

Grant County is requesting that when awarding the next EAS contract, you will take into 

consideration our communities needs and select an airline that provides a flight to Albuquerque 

or Santa Fe. 

Please feel free to contact me with any questions. 

Office Of The (-;rant County Commissioners 

1400 Highway 130 East, Silver City, NM 88061 "' P. 0. Box 898, Silver City, NM H8062
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                             1564
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                     61273
<ALLOWANCES>                       3202
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  66709
<PP&E>                            26757
<DEPRECIATION>                    16800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    89061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             53368
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                             50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                        17691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      89061
<SALES>                           40834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  40834
<CGS>                             36224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     36224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   3337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      61
<INCOME-TAX>                         23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  38
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                         38
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .01

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2 - CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Cumberland  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Carol S.
Black,  Secretary and Chief Financial  Officer,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  (S) 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to (S) 906 of the  Sabanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  August 14, 2002                     By:  /s/ Carol S. Black
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Carol S. Black
                                           Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 85 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 85

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate 
corporations, limited liability companies, and other corporate entities 
established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign 
                                 state.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2022

    Mr. Morelle submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate 
corporations, limited liability companies, and other corporate entities 
established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign 
                                 state.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. The rights enumerated in this Constitution and other 
rights retained by the people shall be the rights of natural persons.
    ``Section 2. As used in this Constitution, the terms `people', 
`person', and `citizen' shall not include a corporation, a limited 
liability company, or any other corporate entity established by the 
laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state.
    ``Section 3. A corporate entity described in section 2 shall be 
subject to such regulation as the people, through representatives in 
Congress and State representatives, may determine reasonable, 
consistent with the powers of Congress and the States under this 
Constitution.
    ``Section 4. Nothing in this article shall be construed to limit 
the rights enumerated in this Constitution and other rights retained by 
the people, which are unalienable.''.
                                 <all>
```
Learn more at www.nationalguard.mil

Current as of August 2022 Point of Contact: NGB Public Affairs at (703) 607-2612

Why a Cyber Operations Team?

• Department of Defense depends on 

cyberspace to:

 - Execute its national security mission

 - Provide a timely response to crisis or 

 contingency operations 

 - Project power abroad and ensure the

 safety of our troops

• Governors have authority to: 

 - Command NG cyber forces like other

 NG capabilities when in a state 

status

• The Army National Guard has: 

 1x Cyber Brigade

 5x Cyber Battalions

 5x Cyber Security Companies

 2x Cyber Security Detachments 

 5x Cyber Warfare Companies 

 2x Cyber Warfare Company Detachments

 11x Cyber Protection Teams

 3x Cyber Protection Detachments

• The Air National Guard currently has:

 3x Cyber Operations Groups

 12x Cyber Operations Squadrons (Cyber Protection Team)

 3x Cyber Operations Squadron (National Mission Teams)

 20x Mission Defense Teams

 1x Cyber Operations Squadron (Aggressor/Red Team)

Cyber Operations Missions/Tasks

• Defensive Cyberspace Operations 

• Cyber Command Readiness Inspections 

• Vulnerability assessments

• Cyber opposing force (OPFOR) support (threat emulation)

• Critical infrastructure assessment

• Theater security cooperation

• Federal Emergency Management 

 Agency (FEMA) support

Types of National Guard Cyber Units

National Guard Cyber Defense Team

Cyber Protection Teams

Defend the DODIN, protect priority 

missions, prepare forces for combat

Defensive Cyber Ops Elements

Defensive internal measures to 

secure National Guard portion of 

the DODIN & respond to state cyber 

emergencies as directed by Governor or Adjutant General

Cyber Warfare Companies

Full spectrum cyber operations support, OPFOR support to exercises, 

& pen-testing

Cyber Security Companies

Vulnerability assessments, forensics 

analysis, Industrial Control Systems 

expertise, USCYBERCOM Readiness Inspections, cybersecurity 

support

Cyber Protection Teams

Defend the DODIN, protect 

priority missions, prepare force for 

combat

Mission Defense Teams

Defensive cyber operations on 

specific weapons platform/system

National Mission Teams 

Intelligence-driven cyber operations against nation state actors in 

defense

of the nation

Red Team

Vulnerability assessments of friendly 

networks in support of Combatant 

Command & Service requirements

Army National Guard Air National Guard

The NG participates in several cyber exercises annually, to include:

• Cyber Shield is an unclassified NG-hosted exercise focusing on the 

defense of Guard Net and state-directed coordination actions

• Cyber Yankee/Dawn are FEMA Regions 1 and 9 events, respectively, 

that allow cyber troops to test their capabilities and knowledge for incident 

response against live threat actors in a cyber range environment

• Cyber Flag/Guard are USCYBERCOMMAND hosted, inter-agency 

cyber exercises at the classified level focusing on critical infrastructure
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1052 

To withdraw certain Federal land in the State of Arizona from location, 

entry, and patent under mining laws, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2021 

Mr. GRIJALVA (for himself, Mr. O’HALLERAN, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. 

HUFFMAN, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. STANTON, Mrs. 

NAPOLITANO, Mr. SABLAN, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. NADLER, Mr. 

CASTEN, Mr. LEVIN of California, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. NEGUSE, and Mr. 

BLUMENAUER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Federal land in the State of Arizona 

from location, entry, and patent under mining laws, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grand Canyon Protec5 tion Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1052 IH

1 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN FEDERAL LAND IN THE 

2 STATE OF ARIZONA. 

3 (a) DEFINITION OF MAP.—In this Act, the term 

4 ‘‘Map’’ means the map prepared by the Bureau of Land 

5 Management entitled ‘‘Grand Canyon Protection Act’’ and 

6 dated January 22, 2021. 

7 (b) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

8 the approximately 1,006,545 acres of Federal land in the 

9 State of Arizona, generally depicted on the Map as ‘‘Fed10 eral Mineral Estate to be Withdrawn’’, including any land 

11 or interest in land that is acquired by the United States 

12 after the date of the enactment of this Act, are hereby 

13 withdrawn from— 

14 (1) all forms of entry, appropriation, and dis15 posal under the public land laws; 

16 (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

17 laws; and 

18 (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral 

19 materials, and geothermal leasing laws. 

20 (c) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The Map shall be kept 

21 on file and made available for public inspection in the ap22 propriate offices of the Forest Service and the Bureau of 

23 Land Management. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-881100) pertaining to the 1993 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-81124) pertaining to the 1991 Long-Term Employee Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-88744) pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43631) pertaining to the Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, the Registration Statement on (Form S-8 No. 333-149674) pertaining to the 2007 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-155051) pertaining to the 2008 shelf registration of securities and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-161484 pertaining to the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our reports dated February 28, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Almost Family, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Almost Family, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
 
 
 Louisville, Kentucky
 February 28, 2011
[State]

[Office of the Adjutant General]

[Address]

[Office Symbol] [Date]

MEMORANDUM FOR National Guard Bureau, Human Capital Management Division 

ATTN: NGB-ARZ-HCM, 111 South George Mason Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22204-1382

SUBJECT: TAG Release, [Name of Candidate] (Application for CY 2026 Congressional 

Fellowship)

1. I recommend and release [Soldier] for consideration for the CY 2026 Army Congressional 

Fellowship Program. He/She meets the requirements for consideration IAW the FY 2024 Army 

Broadening Opportunity Program Catalog.

2. The [State] Army National Guard and [Soldier] understand that by accepting this Title 10 

AGR tour, [Soldier] will incur two Active Duty Service Obligations (ADSOs); one for pursuing 

a graduate degree and the second ADSO for participating in the Congressional Fellowship

program. Both ADSOs will be served concurrently, approximately a four year ADSO beginning 

upon completion of [Soldier’s] year long duty in a congressional office. 

3. The fellowship program and utilization tour is approximately 44-months total time (March

2025 through December 2028). 

4. {FOR TRADITIONAL DRILLING SOLDIERS ONLY} If (Soldier) is selected to 

participate in the CY 2026 Congressional Fellowship program, the Army National Guard will 

place (Soldier) on active orders prior to effective start date. 

5. I, The Adjutant General, and [Soldier] understand that the candidate must be able to complete 

the full fellowship program and utilization tour without interruption in the Washington DC area. 

[Soldier] will return to Title 32 AGR or M-Day status upon completion of the fellowship. 

6. POC is [Name], [Title], and [Contact Information]

NAME

Rank, XXARNG

The Adjutant General
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7669

AARON HOLSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAUL DAVIS, Individually and as Chairperson of

the Maryland Parole Board; BLOUNT, Individually and as Commissioner with the Parole

Commission; MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION; MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION-PERSONNEL AND

OFFICIALS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-96-3989-JFM)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Wendy Ann Kronmiller, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Susan Lynn Howe, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND

CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Holsey appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint and

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Holsey v. Davis, No. CA-96-3989-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 9 and Oct. 9,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 1:18-cv-00593-SJD-KLL Doc #: 22-1 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 67

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
ERICA SHIELDS : Case No. 1:18-cv-593-SJD-KLL
Plaintiff, * Judge Susan J. Dlott

: Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUBMIT

SINCLAIR MEDIA III INC. : SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

. RELEVANT TO MOTION TO WITHDRAW
Defendant. . UNDER SEAL FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION

This matter came before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ counsel’s Motion to Submit
Supporting Documentation Relevant to Motion to Withdraw Under Seal for Jn Camera
Inspection. Based upon all of the things properly before the Court, the Court hereby GRANTS
said motion, and grants leave to movants’ to submit materials supporting the motion to
withdraw under seal and for an in camera inspection.

SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

OR
United States Kiar c, Judge
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary C. Parks, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Gary C. Parks |
|--------|-------------------|

Gary C. Parks

Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

February 9, 2007
STATE of Louisiana v. Steven Anthony WALCOTT, Jr.

2018-KH-752

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

Hughes, J., concurs in the denial of the writ.

I concur because a sanity hearing is scheduled for May 23rd. But further continuances are going to be a problem.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
Jairo Uriel PAL v. STATE

CR-15-0101

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements,
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,129,581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  795,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,925,299
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,925,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          888,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,036,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,925,299
<SALES>                                      1,467,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,467,572
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               386,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,071,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,071,601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.53
        

</TABLE>