# Attachment H 7

Alabama Modeling Summary

# BART Exemption Modeling

of Sources in Alabama

January 2007

Prepared For:

VISTAS

526 Forest Parkway, Suite F

Forest Park, GA 30297

Submitted By:

TRC Environmental Corporation

650 Suffolk Street, Wannalancit Mills

Lowell, MA 01854

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. INTRODUCTION 1-1

2. SOURCE PARAMETERS 2-1

3. GEOPHYSICAL AND METEOROLOGICAL DATA 3-1

3.1 Modeling Domain, Terrain, and Class I Areas 3-1

3.2 Land Use 3-1

3.3 Meteorological Data Base 3-4

3.4 Air Quality Monitoring Data 3-4

4

. RESULTS 4-1

5. REFERENCES 5-1



# LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 2-1a. Lehigh Cement Company: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-2

Table 2-2a. Sloss Industries Fiber Div: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-3

Table 2-2b. Sloss Industries Fiber Div: Particle Speciation 2-3

Table 2-3a. ACIPCO: Source Paramete rs and Emissions 2-4

Table 2-3b. ACIPCO: Particle Speciation 2-4

Table 2-4a. U.S. Pipe-Bessemer: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-5

Table 2-4b. U.S. Pipe-Bessemer: Particle Speciation 2-5

Table 2-5a. U.S. Steel: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-6

Table 2-5b. U.S. Steel: Particle Speciation 2-6

Table 2-6a. Oak Grove Resources: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-7

Table 2-6b. Oak Grove Resources: Particle Speciation 2-7

Table 2-7a. 3M Company, Decatur Plant: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-8

Table 2-7b. 3M Company, Decatur Plant: Particle Speciation 2-8

i

# Table 2-8a. National Cement Co of AL: Sour ce Parameters and Emissions 2-9

Table 2-8b. National Cement Co of AL: Particle Speciation 2-9

Table 2-9a. CEMEX Demopolis: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-10

Table 2-9b. CEMEX Demopolis: Particle Speciation 2-11

Table 2-10a. MeadWestvaco-Mahrt: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-12

Table 2-10b. MeadWestvaco-Mahrt: Particle Speciation 2-12

Table 2-11a. International Paper-Prattville: Sour ce Parameters and Emissions 2-13

Table 2-11b. International Paper-Prattville : Particle Speciation 2-13

Table 2-12a. Fort James Operating Co: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-14

Table 2-12b. Fort James Operating Co: Particle Speciation 2-14

Table 2-13a. Bowater-Coosa Pines: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-15

Table 2-13b. Bowater-Coosa Pines: Particle Speciation 2-15

Table 2-14a. International Paper-Riverdale: Sour ce Parameters and Emissions 2-16

Table 2-14b. International Paper-Riverdale : Particle Speciation 2-16

Table 2-15a. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-17

Table 2-15b. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.: Particle Speciation 2-17

Table 2-16a. International Paper Co, Courtland: So urce Parameters and Emissions 2-18

Table 2-16b. International Paper Co, Courtla nd: Particle Speciation 2-18

Table 2-17a. Weyerhaeuser-Pine Hill: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-19

Table 2-17b. Weyerhaeuser-Pine Hill: Particle Speciation 2-19

Table 2-18a. Shell Chemical Co: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-20

Table 2-18b. Shell Chemical Co: Particle Speciation 2-20

Table 2-19a. Ciba Specialty Chemicals: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-21

Table 2-19b. Ciba Specialty Chemicals: Particle Speciation 2-22

Table 2-20a. Boise White Paper: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-23

Table 2-20b. Boise White Paper: Particle Speciation 2-23

ii

# Table 2-21a. Smurfit Stone Brewton: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-24

Table 2-21b. Smurfit Stone Brewton: Particle Speciation 2-24

Table 2-22a. Degussa Corp.: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-25

Table 2-22b. Degussa Corp.: Particle Speciation 2-26

Table 2-23a. Continental Carbon Company: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-27

Table 2-23b. Continental Carbon Company: Particle Speciation 2-27

Table 2-24a. Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc.: Source Parameters and Emissions 2-28

Table 2-24b. Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc.: Particle Speciation 2-28

Table 4-1. Summary of Visibility Results for Lehigh Cement Company 4-3

Table 4-2. Summary of Visibility Results for Sloss Industries Fiber Div 4-3

Table 4-3. Summary of Visibility Results for ACIPCO 4-3

Table 4-4. Summary of Visibility Results for U.S. Pipe- Bessemer 4-4

Table 4-5. Summary of Visibility Results for U.S. Steel 4-4

Table 4-6. Summary of Visibility Results for Oak Grove Resources 4-4

Table 4-7. Summary of Visibility Results for 3M Company, Decatur Plant 4-5

Table 4-8. Summary of Visibility Results for National Cement Co of AL 4-5

Table 4-9. Summary of Visibility Results for CEMEX Demopolis 4-5

Table 4-10. Summary of Visibility Results for MeadWestvaco-Mahrt 4-6

Table 4-11. Summary of Visibility Results for International Paper-Prattville 4-6

Table 4-12. Summary of Visibility Results for Fort James Operating Co 4-6

Table 4-13. Summary of Visibility Results for Bowater-Coosa Pines 4-7

Table 4-14. Summary of Visibility Results for International Paper-Riverdale 4-7

Table 4-15. Summary of Visibility Results for Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 4-7

Table 4-16. Summary of Visibility Results for In ternational Paper Co, Courtland 4-8

Table 4-17. Summary of Visibility Results for Weyerhaeuser-Pine Hill 4-8

Table 4-18. Summary of Visibility Results for Shell Chemical Co 4-8

iii

# iv 

# Table 4-19. Summary of Visibility Results for Ciba Specialty Chemicals 4-9

Table 4-20. Summary of Visibility Results for Boise White Paper 4-9

Table 4-21. Summary of Visibility Results for Smurfit Stone Brewton 4-9

Table 4-22. Summary of Visibility Results for Degussa Corp. 4-10

Table 4-23. Summary of Visibility Results for Continental Carbon Company 4-10

Table 4-24. Summary of Visibility Results for Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc. 4-10

Table 4-25. Monthly f(RH) Values Based on the Centro id of the Area, for Visibility Method

6 Applications 4-11



# LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure 3-1. Terrain elevations for the CALMET 12-km regional domain. The CALPUFF

computational subdomain, the Class I areas and the locations of the Alabama

facilities are also shown. 3-2

Figure 3-2. Terrain elevations for the CALPUFF Computational Subdomain. The Class I

areas and the sites of the Alabama facilities are also shown. 3-3

Figure 3-3. Land Use for the CALPUFF Computational Subdomain. The Class I areas and

the sites of the Alabama facilities are also shown. 3-5

Figure 3-4. Plot of ozone stations used for the CALPUFF simulations. The Class I areas and

the sites of the Alabama facilities are also shown. 3-6

# 1. INTRODUCTION

TRC Environmental Corporation, on behalf of VISTAS has been retained to conduct Best

Available Retrofit Technology (BART) exemption modeling for a number of facilities in the

southeastern United States. This report documents the results of the modeling simulations

conducted in accordance with the VISTAS BART Protocol Revision 3.2 dated August 31, 2006

(VISTAS, 2006) for emissions from twenty fo ur BART-eligible facilities in Alabama.

The VISTAS BART protocol is based on the u se of the CALMET and CALPUFF models (Scire

et al., 2000a, 2000b). The modeling approach uses 12-km VISTAS regional CALMET

meteorological datasets for facilities located more than 50-km from the closest Class I area for

screening simulations of predicted impacts. The highest impact during the three year simulation

period is compared to a 0.5 deciview threshold. According to the VISTAS protocol, sources with

impacts less than this threshold are not subject to BART control.

The modeling uses the VISTAS version of the CALPUFF modeling system (CALMET Version

5.723 and CALPUFF Version 5.754) available from the TRC Atmospheric Studies Group web

site ( http://www.src.com ).

Introduction 1-1

# 2. SOURCE PARAMETERS

VISTAS BART exemption modeling was performed for the twenty four facilities in Alabama.

These sources are: (1) Lehigh Cement Company; (2) Sloss Industries Fiber Div; (3) ACIPCO; (4)

U.S. Pipe-Bessemer; (5) U.S. Steel; (6) Oak Grove Resources; (7) 3M Company, Decatur Plant;

(8) National Cement Co; (9) CEMEX Demopolis; ( 10) MeadWestvaco-Mahrt; (11) International

Paper-Prattville; (12) Fort James Operating Co; (13) Bowater-Coosa Pines; (14) International

Paper-Riverdale; (15) Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.; (16) International Paper Co, Courtland;

(17) Weyerhaeuser-Pine Hill; (18) Shell Chemical Co; (19) Ciba Specialty Chemicals; (20) Boise

White Paper; (21) Smurfit Stone Brewton; ( 22) Degussa Corp.; (23) Continental Carbon

Company; (24) Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc. These twenty four facilities were modeled using the

screening 12-km regional VISTAS CALMET domain with CALPUFF computational subdomain

as shown in Figure 3-1. Locations of the Alabama facilities are shown in Figures 3-1 through 3-3.

Source parameters and emissions rates as provided by the State of Alabama for each of the twenty

four facilities used in the CALPUFF simulations are shown in Tables 2-1a through 2-24a. Tables

2-1b through 2-24b show the particle speciation u sed in the CALPUFF simula tions. In the tables,

the column heading PM 10 

# includes all PM mass (condensable plus filterable) emitted as

particulate matter less than 10 micrometers ( μ m) in diameter. The emissions labeled as PM 2.5 

# are

a subset of the PM 10 

# composed of particles less than 2.5 μ m in diameter. All condensable

emissions are assumed to be in the PM 2.5 

# size range. The PM 10 

# and PM 2.5 

# categories include

H 2 

# SO 4 

# emissions, which in the model are treated as primary sulfate (SO 4 

# ). The emissions of

H 2 

# SO 4 

# are adjusted by the ratio of molecular we ights (96/98) to obtain the emissions as SO 4



# which is entered into the model.

The PM 10 

# size distribution was represented in the modeling as six explicit size ranges. The

particle sizes modeled were as 8.0 μ m diameter size particles (PM800) reflecting the size bin

6-10 μ m, 4.25 μ m diameter particles (PM425) for the size bin 2.5-6 μ m, 1.875 μ m particles

(PM187) for the size bin 1.25-2.5 μ m, 1.125 μ m particles (PM112) for the size bin 1.00-1.25 μ m,

0.8125 μ m particles (PM081) for the size bin 0.625-1.00 μ m, and 0.5625 μ m (PM056) for the size

range 0.500-0.625 μ m. PM056 was also used for all particles less than 0.5 μ m diameter.

Emissions of particulate matter in the 2.5-10 μ m diameter size range define “coarse particulate

matter”. Fine particles (soil) we re defined using the particle size categories of PM187, PM112,

PM081, and PM056 which is particulate matter with a size of 2.5 μ m diameters or less. For

sources with no speciation (emissions given as PM 10 

# only) it was conservatively assumed that all

the particulate emissions were condensable which have higher extinction efficiency than either

soil or coarse particulate matter. Condensable em issions were assumed to be evenly distributed

across the smallest two size categories modeled (i.e. 50 percent in PM081 and 50 percent in

PM056).

Source Parameters 2-1Table 2-1a. Lehigh Cement Company: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s005965.814-659.55765.01193.553.9612.48366.4812.8898-78.8621---1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.Source Parameters2-2Table 2-2a. Sloss Industries Fiber Div: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sS01904.907-663.39955.17175.563.736.66344.824.922-0.2610.0260.026-S01904.907-663.39955.17175.563.736.66344.825.146-0.2720.0280.028-S02904.965-663.4552.49175.561.0940.53314.82---0.2730.273-S03904.965-663.4552.49175.561.0940.53307.59---0.2860.286-Table 2-2b. Sloss Industries Fiber Div: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sS01100.00.00.013230.01323-------------S01100.00.00.013860.01386-------------S02100.00.00.136710.13671-------------S03100.00.00.143010.14301-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided betweenthe two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-3Table 2-3a. ACIPCO: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s037939.102-661.83428.35180.291.2222.57307.60.87-4.330.435--007939.102-661.83423.06177.771.5222.83533.20.01-1.990.014--Table 2-3b. ACIPCO: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s037100.00.00.217350.21735-------------007100.00.00.007120.00712-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided betweenthe two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-4Table 2-4a. U.S. Pipe-Bessemer: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s8 (S10A1P1)928.080-677.5262.74148.670.445.23298.71---0.339--8 (S10A2P1)928.093-677.5622.74148.670.446.16298.71---0.326--8 (S10A3P1)927.894-677.5712.74157.910.446.16298.71---0.126--8 (S10A5P1)928.101-677.4492.74148.790.446.16298.71---0.048--8 (S02A3P1)927.969-677.35320.42165.940.1032.99298.71---0.002--Table 2-4b. U.S. Pipe-Bessemer: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s8 (S10A1P1)100.00.00.169600.16960-------------8 (S10A2P1)100.00.00.162920.16292-------------8 (S10A3P1)100.00.00.062870.06287-------------8 (S10A5P1)100.00.00.024130.02413-------------8 (S02A3P1)100.00.00.001010.00101-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided betweenthe two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-5Table 2-5a. U.S. Steel: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s113930.891-669.60415.24166.123.666.10293.2---1.337--214930.828-670.20447.09166.121.9824.69345.4--2.031.389--215930.795-670.16347.09166.121.9824.69345.4--2.091.749--217930.831-670.14842.67166.120.7016.76293.2---0.161--218930.892-670.10727.43166.120.7016.76293.2---0.197--225929.645-671.30722.86164.590.6921.34310.9------Table 2-5b. U.S. Steel: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s113100.00.00.668430.66843-------------214100.00.00.694260.69426-------------215100.00.00.874440.87444-------------217100.00.00.080640.08064-------------218100.00.00.098280.09828-------------225-----------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided betweenthe two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-6Table 2-6a. Oak Grove Resources: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sS102A922.142-674.0119.14175.260.8815.21293.2---0.1740.055-S102B922.142-674.0119.14175.260.8815.21293.2---0.1740.055-S102C922.142-674.0119.14175.260.8815.21293.2---0.1740.055-S103921.553-674.16835.05175.260.1047.54316.5---0.00220.0007-S104921.553-674.1686.10175.260.2011.53316.5---0.00170.0005-S105921.553-674.16810.97175.260.9114.39293.2---0.01030.0032-S106895.126-676.86112.19175.260.8117.25293.2---0.00110.0004-S107A921.553-674.1686.10175.260.201.15316.5---0.00220.0007-S107 B921.553-674.1686.10175.260.201.15316.5---0.00220.0007-Table 2-6b. Oak Grove Resources: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sS102A100.00.00.086940.08694-------------S102B100.00.00.086940.08694-------------S102C100.00.00.086940.08694-------------S103100.00.00.001100.00110-------------S104100.00.00.000830.00083-------------S105100.00.00.005170.00517-------------S106100.00.00.000570.00057-------------S107A100.00.00.001100.00110-------------S107 B100.00.00.001100.00110-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided betweenthe two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-7Table 2-7a. 3M Company, Decatur Plant: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sX001906.756-543.22513.41181.051.3710.71585.938.303-4.1581.71361.0584-X020906.756-543.22513.41181.050.8514.80566.484.939-2.4701.04580.6552-X090906.756-543.22533.53181.050.614.61533.150.001-0.1540.00180.0018-X091906.756-543.22547.24181.050.912.65533.150.001-0.1930.00250.0025-X056906.756-543.22513.41181.050.8514.80566.484.939-2.4701.04580.6552-Table 2-7b. 3M Company, Decatur Plant: Particle Speciation3a, 3b, 3cParticle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sX00110.389.70.07560.07560.01260.0126-0.22680.42840.40320.4032--0.03780.0378--X02012.088.00.05040.05040.01260.0126-0.13860.25200.23940.2394--0.02520.0252--X090100.00.00.00090.0009-------------X091100.00.00.00130.0013-------------X05612.088.00.05040.05040.01260.0126-0.13860.25200.23940.2394--0.02520.0252--1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3aEmission rate in column labeled as “OC, 0.5-0.625 μm (g/s)” was provided by the state as “See OC 0.625-1 μm”. Emission rate forOC, 0.5-0.625 μm was assumed to be equal toemission rate for OC 0.625-1 μm. Similar methodology was applied for other comments of this type. These values are written in green in Table 2-7b for stack X001, X020 and X056.3bPM10emissions (in g/s) provided by the state for stacks X001, X020 and X056 are: 07560, 0.4498 and 0.4498, respectively. The adjustments were made in Table 2-7a (in blue) to matchthe PM speciation provided by the state in Table 2-7b, such that:OC + IOC + Coarse + Soil + EC +H2SO4= PM10and Coarse = PM10- PM2.53cThe PM speciation was not provided by the state for stacks X090 and X091. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is aconservative approach since organic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-8Table 2-8a. National Cement Co ofAL: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s52DC10998.873-634.49611.28156.363.7310.06398.2---0.231--54KP01998.873-634.49665.23156.363.8914.33388.244.98-66.154.23612.26930.136171DC01998.873-634.49618.90158.500.9125.30366.5---0.016--71DC02998.873-634.49613.72158.501.2622.86349.8---0.016--72DC01998.873-634.49618.90158.500.9125.30366.5---0.013--72DC02998.873-634.49613.72158.501.1718.29349.8---0.013--Table 2-8b. National Cement Co of AL: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s52DC10100.00.00.115290.11529-------------54KP01100.00.02.118062.11806-------------71DC01100.00.00.008190.00819-------------71DC02100.00.00.008190.00819-------------72DC01100.00.00.006300.00630-------------72DC02100.00.00.006300.00630-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided betweenthe two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-9Table 2-9a. CEMEX Demopolis: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sZ001-A860.360-785.68939.3233.530.2514.09294.3---0.033--Z001-B860.373-785.90027.7433.530.2518.79294.3---0.043--Z002860.366-785.74928.9633.532.136.54380.4---2.709--Z004-1860.360-785.68942.6733.533.3523.15394.317.64-102.825.040--Z004-2860.430-785.78327.1333.532.136.31459.82.52-11.340.504--Z004-A860.373-785.90033.2233.530.4121.95338.7---0.130--Z004-B860.373-785.90033.2233.530.4121.95338.7---0.130--Z004-C860.360-785.68917.9833.530.3316.64338.7---0.064--Z004-D860.360-785.68939.9333.530.3316.64338.7---0.043--Z005-A860.360-785.68935.9733.530.2519.41344.3---0.043--Z005-B860.360-785.68936.5833.530.2514.56344.3---0.033--Z005-C860.360-785.68939.3233.530.2513.98344.3---0.033--Z005-D860.360-785.68927.7433.530.2029.12344.3---0.043--Z005-E860.360-785.68935.9733.530.2420.71344.3---0.043--Z005-F860.360-785.68932.6133.530.3921.33344.3---0.117--Z006-A860.360-785.68927.7433.530.2021.84294.3---0.033--Z006-B860.360-785.68927.7433.530.2021.84294.3---0.033--Z006-C860.360-785.68920.7333.530.9133.80377.6---1.016--Z007-A860.360-785.68927.7433.530.2021.84294.3---0.033--Z007-B860.360-785.68920.7333.530.9133.95377.6---1.016--Z008-A860.534-785.44853.0433.530.4121.18333.2---0.130--Z008-B860.534-785.44855.4733.530.4617.26333.2---0.130--Z008-C860.534-785.4486.1033.530.2317.47333.2---0.033--Z009-A860.534-785.44853.3433.530.4121.84333.2---0.130--Z009-B860.534-785.4486.1033.530.2317.47333.2---0.033--Z009-C860.534-785.4488.5333.530.2029.12333.2---0.043--Z010860.430-785.7838.5333.530.1721.18294.3---0.260--Source Parameters2-10Table 2-9b. CEMEX Demopolis: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sZ001-A100.00.00.016380.01638-------------Z001-B100.00.00.021420.02142-------------Z002100.00.01.354501.35450-------------Z004-1100.00.02.520002.52000-------------Z004-2100.00.00.252000.25200-------------Z004-A100.00.00.064890.06489-------------Z004-B100.00.00.064890.06489-------------Z004-C100.00.00.032130.03213-------------Z004-D100.00.00.021420.02142-------------Z005-A100.00.00.021420.02142-------------Z005-B100.00.00.016380.01638-------------Z005-C100.00.00.016380.01638-------------Z005-D100.00.00.021420.02142-------------Z005-E100.00.00.021420.02142-------------Z005-F100.00.00.058590.05859-------------Z006-A100.00.00.016380.01638-------------Z006-B100.00.00.016380.01638-------------Z006-C100.00.00.507780.50778-------------Z007-A100.00.00.016380.01638-------------Z007-B100.00.00.507780.50778-------------Z008-A100.00.00.064890.06489-------------Z008-B100.00.00.064890.06489-------------Z008-C100.00.00.016380.01638-------------Z009-A100.00.00.064890.06489-------------Z009-B100.00.00.016380.01638-------------Z009-C100.00.00.021420.02142-------------Z010100.00.00.129780.12978-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided betweenthe two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.Source Parameters2-114M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Table 2-10a. MeadWestvaco-Mahrt:Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sX0021125.188-792.81564.6288.702.8321.54477.630.621.5417.1410.77568.6248-X0031125.209-792.83864.6288.701.2212.02339.80.18--3.01142.45910.945X0051125.167-792.68922.8688.701.528.86343.714.11-5.636.16665.9252-X0081125.158-792.82664.6288.703.667.56373.230.130.002025.7115.144910.2913-X0091125.162-792.81264.6288.702.448.62340.423.82-7.016.40796.3060-X102A1125.149-792.88120.1288.700.8517.98366.50.0006-0.110.013--X102B1125.149-792.88120.1288.700.7325.05366.50.0006-0.110.013--X102C1125.149-792.88120.1288.700.7324.81366.50.0006-0.110.013--X102D1125.149-792.88120.1288.701.0113.23366.50.0006-0.110.013--Table 2-10b. MeadWestvaco-Mahrt: Particle Speciation3a, 3bParticle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sX00238.961.10.4375-2.2105-1.541.84820.30261.05240.58540.85501.9469----X0031.998.10.0151-0.0431--0.34260.20970.52570.25990.47251.1429----X0052.197.90.0097-0.1215--0.10860.13280.66390.36821.48473.2772----X00855.644.42.9445-5.4683-0.00202.71802.13550.51770.12940.84130.25890.1293---X00920.579.50.4594-0.8531--0.10190.00000.10190.05104.8407-----X102A100.00.00.00650.0065-------------X102B100.00.00.00650.0065-------------X102C100.00.00.00650.0065-------------X102D100.00.00.00650.0065-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3aPM10and PM2.5emissions (in g/s) provided by the state for stacks X002, X003, X005, X008, and X009 are: 6.577and 3.420, 2.953 and 2.156, 6.035 and 4.527, 6.471 and 1.618, and5.095 and 5.019, respectively. The adjustments were made in Table 2-10a (in blue) tomatch the PM speciation provided by the state in Table 2-10b, such that:OC + IOC + Coarse + Soil + EC +H2SO4= PM10and Coarse = PM10- PM2.53bThe PM speciation was not provided by the state for stacks X102A, X102B, X102C and X102D. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC.This is a conservative approach since organic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.Source Parameters2-124M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Table 2-11a. International Paper-Prattville: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s001921.553-674.16862.4862.033.2014.61413.728.10-11.595.6704.284-A02922.142-674.01160.3562.031.1910.61331.50.13-0.133.1502.7720.504B02922.142-674.01160.3562.031.199.11337.00.13-0.133.1502.7720.504003922.142-674.01145.7262.061.887.99341.5--2.149.8288.568-801921.553-674.16866.7562.031.8317.47339.356.70-15.623.6541.512-802921.553-674.16866.7562.031.8317.07340.456.70-15.623.6541.512-Table 2-11b. International Paper-Prattville: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sX008100.00.02.835002.83500-------------X009100.00.01.575001.57500-------------X102A100.00.01.575001.57500-------------X102B100.00.04.914004.91400-------------X102C100.00.01.827001.82700-------------X102D100.00.01.827001.82700-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided betweenthe two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-13Table 2-12a. Fort James Operating Co: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sZ016843.898-819.59076.2025.911.8321.44457.659.180.49824.8476.52085.95630.863Z017843.887-819.62076.2025.911.9815.65408.261.552.77224.6468.46197.08470.252X195843.943-819.65136.5825.911.5212.94595.40.01-6.917--0.063X196843.928-819.65936.5825.911.5212.94595.40.01-6.917--0.063Table 2-12b. Fort James Operating Co: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sZ01672.727.30.42670.42711.69471.69470.4980.15620.40820.29480.10210.78120.00000.00120.00600.03010.0000Z01741.358.70.05170.05160.31000.31002.7720.63130.74591.37590.34400.22931.37590.10960.02870.01720.1089X195-----------------X196-----------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3PM10and PM2.5emissions (in g/s) provided by the state for stacks Z016 and Z017 are: 6.010 and 5.443, and 5.733and 4.356, respectively. Theadjustments were made in Table 2-12a(in blue) to match the PM speciation providedby the state in Table 2-12b, such that:OC + IOC + Coarse + Soil + EC +H2SO4= PM10and Coarse = PM10- PM2.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-14Table 2-13a. Bowater-Coosa Pines: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sSDT3985.835-680.78957.30128.561.685.36359.00.020.001-0.8450.049-RB3985.875-680.79160.99128.563.0125.01447.06.370.3186.4532.8743.889-LK3985.801-680.84427.43128.561.378.99346.50.380.0190.2923.8590.095-Table 2-13b. Bowater-Coosa Pines: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sSDT3100.00.00.422000.42200--0.001----------RB3100.00.01.277951.27795--0.318----------LK3100.00.01.919901.91990--0.019----------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-15Table 2-14a. International Paper-Riverdale: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sBP1949.689-786.35234.750.001.1913.15315.9------RB1949.689-786.35260.9661.872.6516.95460.934.270.2904.7380.2900.290-ST1949.689-786.35244.8161.871.0711.19347.00.02-0.0933.0802.640-PB1949.689-786.35244.8161.872.1311.29414.817.77-20.7900.2490.225-Table 2-14b. International Paper-Riverdale: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sBP1-----------------RB1------0.290----------ST1100.00.01.539971.53997-------------PB1100.00.00.124740.12474-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-16Table 2-15a. Syngenta Crop Protection,Inc.: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sX001858.278-958.72030.489.751.225.621005.370.04-0.639-0.0200.000X002858.108-958.43330.489.751.225.621005.373.74-0.884-0.0230.001X015857.592-958.8449.149.750.769.27410.9--0.360-0.028-X016857.968-958.5719.149.750.6612.63422.0--0.360-0.028-X099857.929-958.46324.389.750.1814.45294.3---0.001--X099858.094-958.47924.389.750.1326.08294.3---0.123--X099858.100-958.44516.469.750.10533.152.35-0.0030.059--Table 2-15b. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sX001100.00.00.010080.01008-------------X002100.00.00.011340.01134-------------X015100.00.00.013860.01386-------------X016100.00.00.013860.01386-------------X099100.00.00.000630.00063-------------X099100.00.00.061740.06174-------------X099100.00.00.029610.02961-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-17Table 2-16a. International Paper Co, Courtland: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s1lk881.287-535.67221.34184.281.229.53347.6-0.0030.4413.4453.445-2lk881.287-535.67260.96184.101.475.39342.30.030.0211.0061.1661.166-1pb881.287-535.67279.55184.102.3819.30339.3-0.28214.1925.4105.410-2pb881.210-535.88279.55184.103.5112.94339.18.25-6.2052.500--2rb881.298-535.77279.55184.103.3522.76451.454.430.54319.1524.5593.798-2rsdtv881.298-535.77279.55184.101.229.75357.00.020.008-1.4931.493-pkgblr881.287-535.67279.55184.102.1318.03485.9---4.5994.599-Table 2-16b. International Paper Co, Courtland: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s1lk100.00.01.721081.72108--0.003----------2lk100.00.00.572680.57268--0.021----------1pb100.00.02.563662.56366--0.282----------2pb100.00.01.250241.25024-------------2rb100.00.02.007812.00781--0.543----------2rsdtv100.00.00.742270.74227--0.008----------pkgblr100.00.02.299502.29950-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-18Table 2-17a. Weyerhaeuser-Pine Hill:Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sZ002898.048-842.58420.5732.311.8310.54343.73.620.0336.7791.85661.81960.000Z007897.898-842.86986.8732.286.107.84489.0111.041.73327.5379.97726.77230.000Z010897.898-842.86986.8732.286.107.84489.044.980.50732.3133.56812.04440.000Table 2-17b. Weyerhaeuser-Pine Hill: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sZ00214.885.20.015080.033280.06030.13310.0330.00160.03540.17700.09810.39580.8736----Z00721.079.00.024160.048320.09660.19331.7330.95282.25212.07890.51970.69301.3859----Z01024.775.30.010690.064160.04280.25660.5070.68170.84210.48120.12030.08020.4812----1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3PM10and PM2.5emissions (in g/s) provided by the state for stacks Z002, Z007, Z010 are: 1.915 and 1.687, 10.172 and 6.612, and 6.683 and 4.344, respectively. The adjustmentswere made in Table 2-17a (in blue) to match the PM speciation provided by the state in Table 2-17b, such that:OC + IOC + Coarse + Soil + EC +H2SO4= PM10and Coarse = PM10- PM2.54M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-19Table 2-18a. Shell Chemical Co: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s1001856.542-979.62822.864.571.371.45588.710.1663-0.30870.0479--1010856.542-979.62848.774.572.131.37560.930.4788-2.64600.1361--1101856.542-979.62832.234.570.911.91527.590.1159-0.21670.0328--1102856.542-979.62833.534.571.832.29574.820.4990-5.29200.0479--Table 2-18b. Shell Chemical Co: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s1001100.00.00.023940.02394-------------1010100.00.00.068040.06804-------------1101100.00.00.016380.01638-------------1102100.00.00.023940.02394-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-20Table 2-19a. Ciba Specialty Chemicals: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s08EP1857.709-902.35618.2914.810.150.03293.15------08EP4857.709-902.35612.1914.810.252.37303.15-----0.012608EP3857.709-902.35610.6714.810.101.04347.040.0252-----GFBTC301857.709-902.3569.3014.810.052.87263.71------GFVSL001857.709-902.3566.1014.810.080.89310.93------IFBRF001857.709-902.3566.1014.810.3412.84298.15------IFDSF001857.709-902.3567.3214.810.2011.64298.15------IFPKG001857.709-902.35613.7214.810.3445.72298.15------IFPKG002857.709-902.3569.1414.810.3410.06298.15---0.0063--IFVSL001857.709-902.3567.6214.810.033.57308.15------IFVSL003857.709-902.3567.6214.810.033.57308.15------IFVSL005857.709-902.3569.1414.810.080.66313.15------IFVSL007857.709-902.3569.1414.810.080.67316.48------IFVSL009857.709-902.3569.1414.810.080.39308.15------IFVSL010857.709-902.3569.1414.810.080.41348.15------10EP1857.709-902.35618.2914.810.1522.56305.37------10EP11857.709-902.3566.1014.810.0520.39302.59------10EP12857.709-902.3566.1014.810.058.00302.59------10EP15857.709-902.35621.3414.810.102.71277.59------10EP2857.709-902.35621.3414.810.083.66308.15------10EP5857.709-902.35621.3414.810.100.47363.15------10EP6857.709-902.35621.3414.810.100.21292.59------10EP7857.709-902.35621.3414.810.100.48363.15------10EP8857.709-902.35612.1914.810.6121.21331.480.0013-0.04030.0160--10EP9857.709-902.35615.2414.810.257.16366.48---0.0189--010857.709-902.35612.1914.811.6210.67435.930.0091-8.31350.0377--011857.709-902.35612.1914.811.628.72435.931.5372-3.30880.5495--012857.709-902.35614.6314.811.5211.89422.040.0091-8.31350.0377--013857.709-902.35614.6314.811.5211.89422.040.0091-8.31350.0377--16EP1857.709-902.35619.8114.810.204.36293.150.0000--0.0069--16EP11857.709-902.35639.0114.810.919.021172.040.0013-0.54430.0050--16EP12857.709-902.3561.5214.810.300.03293.15---0.0069--16EP13857.709-902.35612.1914.810.0810.36293.15---0.0084--16EP14857.709-902.35628.9614.810.237.80293.15---0.0018--16EP3857.709-902.3569.1414.810.1510.36293.15---0.0069--16EP5857.709-902.35631.0914.810.306.92304.26------16EP7857.709-902.35617.6814.810.2019.81293.15---0.0311--16EP9857.709-902.35612.1914.810.3618.87293.15---0.0084--Source Parameters2-21Table 2-19b. Ciba Specialty Chemicals: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStack ID#condensablePM10filterablePM10organic condensable(OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s08EP1-----------------08EP4-----------------08EP3-----------------GFBTC301-----------------GFVSL001-----------------IFBRF001-----------------IFDSF001-----------------IFPKG001-----------------IFPKG002100.00.00.003150.00315-------------IFVSL001-----------------IFVSL003-----------------IFVSL005-----------------IFVSL007-----------------IFVSL009-----------------IFVSL010-----------------10EP1-----------------10EP11-----------------10EP12-----------------10EP15-----------------10EP2-----------------10EP5-----------------10EP6-----------------10EP7-----------------10EP8100.00.00.008000.00800-------------10EP9100.00.00.009450.00945-------------010100.00.00.018840.01884-------------011100.00.00.274740.27474-------------012100.00.00.018840.01884-------------013100.00.00.018840.01884-------------16EP1100.00.00.003470.00347-------------16EP11100.00.00.002520.00252-------------16EP12100.00.00.003470.00347-------------16EP13100.00.00.004220.00422-------------16EP14100.00.00.000880.00088-------------16EP3100.00.00.003470.00347-------------16EP5-----------------16EP7100.00.00.015560.01556-------------16EP9100.00.00.004220.00422-------------3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.Source Parameters2-22Table 2-20a. Boise White Paper: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sZ003864.071-900.10542.0613.721.0714.14349.820.0709-0.77541.30741.2809-Z011-N863.990-900.04667.3613.722.2913.35436.480.21800.63503.43351.95801.6484-Z011-S863.980-900.04767.3613.722.2913.35436.480.21800.63503.43351.95801.6484-Z012863.980-900.04764.9213.721.526.13342.590.0315-0.12601.05770.97090.7560Z013864.015-900.01060.9613.722.4416.28465.376.89220.10758.98324.89123.0076-Table 2-20b. Boise White Paper: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sZ00313.386.70.010810.023860.04330.0955-0.00120.02540.12690.07040.28380.6264----Z011-N47.252.80.020300.037560.08120.15020.63500.11570.19380.17900.08480.16150.2988----Z011-S47.252.80.020300.037560.08120.15020.63500.11570.19380.17900.08480.16150.2988----Z01210.489.60.006440.015570.02580.0623-0.01170.07520.18850.09320.16940.4098----Z0135.394.70.010080.020150.04030.08060.10750.56001.32361.22180.30540.40730.8145----1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3PM10and PM2.5emissions (in g/s) provided by the state for stacks Z003, Z011-N, Z011-S, Z012, and Z013 are: 1.3734 and 1.2100, 2.1918 and 1.5240, 2.1918 and 1.5240, 1.2600and 1.1252, and 5.7204 and 5.6060, respectively.The adjustments were made in Table 2-20a (in blue) to match the PM speciationprovided by the state in Table 2-20b, such that:OC + IOC + Coarse + Soil + EC +H2SO4= PM10and Coarse = PM10- PM2.54M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-23Table 2-21a. Smurfit Stone Brewton: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sRB3943.549-938.06673.4630.783.0515.72484.867.05190.20169.96530.40980.5345-SDT3943.525-938.06573.4630.781.526.07338.910.2010-0.30151.78450.1035-RB2943.506-938.04576.2030.783.669.87419.958.72560.05104.84764.01355.4300-SDT2943.535-938.02933.5330.781.0710.30345.110.1215-0.18221.22480.0710-PB2_N943.528-938.05176.2030.781.8328.41502.590.21640.01083.89910.06950.7705-PB2_S943.529-938.05776.2030.781.8328.56504.260.21640.01083.89910.06950.7705-LK2943.574-937.95922.8630.781.0111.13346.410.2077-1.97760.58520.0144-PKG943.497-938.00176.2030.783.6619.44449.820.0037-0.8642-0.0469-Table 2-21b. Smurfit Stone Brewton: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sS01100.00.00.371310.37131--0.2016----------S01100.00.00.943990.94399-------------S02100.00.04.696234.69623--0.0510----------S03100.00.00.647910.64791-------------S01100.00.00.414560.41456--0.0108----------S01100.00.00.414560.41456--0.0108----------S02100.00.00.299800.29980-------------S03100.00.00.023460.02346-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by thestate. Generally, when PM speciation isnot provided, difference between the PM10and H2SO4emissions is equally divided between thetwo size categories of OC. In this case, PM10+ PM2.5- H2SO4emissions were equally divided betweenthe two size categories of OC. This isa conservative approach since organiccondensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-24Table 2-22a. Degussa Corp.: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sME1845.897-997.07552.737.620.6118.90324.8210.76040.11111.31040.2142-0.0040ME2845.897-997.07531.707.620.8131.64295.37---0.1210--204843.623-994.92639.627.620.466.33291.48---0.0139--205843.623-994.92627.437.620.087.25287.04---0.0003--205A843.623-994.9269.147.620.200.15290.37---0.0000--206843.623-994.92627.437.620.5132.14306.48---0.0639--207843.623-994.92633.537.620.2527.33294.82---0.0800--208843.623-994.92624.387.620.2523.32306.48---0.0711--208A843.623-994.92627.437.620.2014.55345.37---0.0064--209843.623-994.92648.777.620.2015.75293.15---0.0199--210843.623-994.92648.777.620.2015.75293.15---0.0199--211843.623-994.92648.777.620.2015.75293.15---0.0199--212843.623-994.92618.297.620.2016.09294.26---0.1008--213843.623-994.92635.437.623.660.05294.26---0.0199--004848.432-1010.97445.727.621.5212.81422.040.0794-7.39620.2003--0A1845.586-1004.09165.537.623.0528.011477.590.0053-22.17600.0092-0.01890A2845.586-1004.09165.537.623.0528.011477.590.0053-22.17600.0092-0.01890A4845.586-1004.09122.867.621.3129.87485.370.0126-6.74480.1588-0.91600A6845.586-1004.09142.677.620.0821.95293.15------0A7845.586-1004.0919.147.620.20130.91293.15------Source Parameters2-25Table 2-22b. Degussa Corp.: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sME1100.00.00.050400.05040--0.1111----------ME2100.00.00.060480.06048-------------204100.00.00.006930.00693-------------205100.00.00.000130.00013-------------205A100.00.00.000010.00001-------------206100.00.00.031940.03194-------------207100.00.00.040010.04001-------------208100.00.00.035530.03553-------------208A100.00.00.003210.00321-------------209100.00.00.009950.00995-------------210100.00.00.009950.00995-------------211100.00.00.009950.00995-------------212100.00.00.050400.05040-------------213100.00.00.009950.00995-------------004100.00.00.100170.10017-------------0A1100.00.00.004600.00460-------------0A2100.00.00.004600.00460-------------0A4100.00.00.079380.07938-------------0A6-----------------0A7-----------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-26Table 2-23a. Continental Carbon Company: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sEPN-71126.446-763.9978.7271.630.419.14588.711.8358-0.28100.1172--Table 2-23b. Continental Carbon Company: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sEPN-7100.00.00.058590.05859-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.Source Parameters2-27Source Parameters2-28Table 2-24a. Carmeuse Lime & Stone,Inc.: Source Parameters and EmissionsLambert ConformalCoordinatesStackID #LCC EastLCC NorthStackHeightBaseElevationDiameterGas ExitVelocityStackGasExitTemp.SO2EmissionsH2SO4Emissions1NOxEmissionsPM10Emissions2PM2.5EmissionsNH3Emissionskmkmmmmm/sKg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s002947.355-697.93831.19176.111.988.22343.711.82570.000215.50430.38180.14490.0001003947.375-697.97714.94176.600.9468.03505.372.47460.00067.21350.35780.17510.0003017947.375-697.97715.24174.590.4517.73322.04---0.00040.0001-006947.227-698.00321.64167.640.559.77362.04---0.04250.0616-007947.226-697.99318.29167.640.6114.56294.26---0.10900.1651-008947.218-698.0092.44167.211.0417.10294.26---0.03230.0266-Table 2-24b. Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc.: Particle Speciation3Particle speciationCondensableFilterableStackID #condensablePM10filterablePM10organiccondensable (OC)inorganiccondensableH2SO4COARSESoilElemental Carbon (EC)0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μmM4=0.48SD4=2.0μm6-10μm2.5-6μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm1.25-2.5μm1.0-1.25μm0.625-1.0μm0.5-0.625μm%%g/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/sg/s002100.00.00.190760.19076--0.0002----------003100.00.00.178610.17861--0.0006----------017100.00.00.000190.00019-------------006100.00.00.021230.02123-------------007100.00.00.054500.05450-------------008100.00.00.016130.01613-------------1H2SO4emissions are entered in CALPUFF as SO4i.e., weighted by ratio of molecular weights (96/98).2PM10emission rate includes filterable and condensable emissions. The condensable component includes H2SO4emissions.3The PM speciation was not provided by the state. All PM10- H2SO4emissions were equally divided between the two size categories of OC. This is a conservative approach sinceorganic condensables have an extinction efficiency of 4 m2/g.4M and SD stand for Geometric Mass Mean Diameter and Geometric Standard Deviation. These are the parameters used to calculate the (SO4) particle size distribution in CALPUFF.

# 3. GEOPHYSICAL AND METEOROLOGICAL DATA

3.1 Modeling Domain, Terrain, and Class I Areas

Gridded terrain elevations for the 12-km re gional VISTAS modeling domain are derived from

GTOPO30, a global digital elevation model (D EM) with a horizontal grid spacing of 30 arc

seconds (approximately 1 kilometer). GTOPO30 is a global data set covering the full extent of

latitude from 90 degrees south to 90 degrees north, and the full extent of longitude from 180

degrees west to 180 degrees east, developed by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The

horizontal grid spacing is 30-arc seconds, resulting in a DEM having dimensions of 21,600 rows

and 43,200 columns. The horizontal coordinate system is decimal degrees of latitude and

longitude referenced to WGS84. The vertical un its represent elevation in meters above mean sea

level. GTOPO30 has been divided into 33 smaller pieces, or tiles. Two of these tiles cover

regional VISTAS domain: W100N40 and W100N90.

The VISTAS CALMET 12-km regional domain was used in CALPUFF modeling and BART

visibility analysis for twenty four facilities in Alabama. The CALPUFF computational subdomain

was chosen to cover all Class I areas that are within 300 km from the AL sources, as well as a 50

km buffer zone from these Class I areas and th e Alabama facilities. The subdomain extends at

least 50 km from the Class I areas and all of the facilities in order to provide an adequate buffer

zone at the boundaries, and to allow the effect s of flow curvature and possible small-scale

recirculation to be evaluated.

Figure 3-1 shows contours of the terrain averag ed to 12 km grid cells on the VISTAS 12-km

regional domain. Blue rectangle depicts th e area of the CALPUFF computational subdomain

covering 768 km by 1020 km or 64x85 grid cells. A Lambert Conformal Projection is used with

an origin of 40.0N, 97.0W and standard paralle ls at 33N and 45N. The datum used is NWS-84.

The Class I areas covered by the computational s ubdomain and that were included in the BART

visibility analysis are: Cohutta, Great Smoky Mountains, Joyce Kilmer-Slickrok, Linville Gorge,

Okefenokee, Shining Rock, Sipsey and St. Marks (Figure 3-2).



# 3.2 Land Use

The USGS Land Use data within the CALMET regi onal and subregional domai ns have been used

to produce a gridded field of dominant land use ca tegories. The land use data were obtained in

Composite Theme Grid format (CTG) from the USGS, with a resolution of 200 m. For the

portions of the domains where CTG data were mi ssing, North America USGS land use/land cover

data have been used. The North America land c over data base is one portion of a global land

cover characteristics data base that was devel oped on a continent-by-continent basis with 1-km

nominal spatial resolution.

Land use data were processed to produce a 12 km resolution gridded field of fractional land use

categories for the regional domain. The 37 USGS land use categories were then mapped into

14 CALMET land use categories. Surface properti es such as albedo, Bowen ratio, roughness

Geophysical and Meteorological Data 3-1

# Geophysical and Meteorological Data 3-2 

# 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

LCC East (km) -1600 -1400 -1200 -1000

-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400LCC North (km)



# LCC Origin: 40.0 N, 97.0 W

Standard Parallels: 33.0 N, 45.0 N

Datum: NWS-84 

# Elevation

(meters)

GA AL TN

SC NC VA

FL KY

Cohutta Great Smoky Mountains

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock Linville Gorge

Okefenokee

Shining Rock

Sipsey

St Marks 

# -25 0.1 50 100 150 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400

AL facility CALPUFF

computational domain



# Figure 3-1. Terrain elevations for the CALMET 12-km regional domain. The CALPUFF

computational subdomain, the Class I areas and the locations of the Alabama facilities are

also shown.

# Geophysical and Meteorological Data 3-3 

# 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400

LCC East (km) -1200 -1100 -1000

-900 -800 -700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200LCC North (km) 

# 1 2 3

4 5 6 7

8

9 10 11

12 13

14

15 16

17

18 19 20

21

22 23 24

LCC Origin: 40.0 N, 97.0 W

Standard Parallels: 33.0 N, 45.0 N

Datum: NWS-84 

# Elevation

(meters)

GA AL TN

SC NC VA

FL KY



# Cohutta Great Smoky Mountains

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock Linville Gorge

Okefenokee Shining Rock

Sipsey

St Marks 

# -25 0.1 50 100 150 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400

AL facility



# Figure 3-2. Terrain elevations for the CALPUFF co mputational subdomain. The Class I areas and the

sites of the Alabama facilities are also shown.

# Geophysical and Meteorological Data 3-4 

# length, and leaf area index were computed propor tionally to the fractional land use. The USGS

land use categories and their associated geophysical parameters are described in Scire et al.

(2000a). Figure 3-3 shows the do minant land use categories for each CALMET grid cell in the

modeling subdomain.



# 3.3 Meteorological Data Base

The meteorological data used include the three dimensional gridded model output from the Fifth

Generation Penn State/NCAR MM5 (Grell 1995) provided by VISTAS. VISTAS has assembled

three years of MM5 meteorological data for the regional CALPUFF modeling. These MM5

datasets have been developed by EPA fo r 2001, VISTAS for 2002 and Midwest Regional

Planning Organization (RPO) for 2003. The MM5 gri dded data set consists of hourly values of

wind speed, wind direction, temperature and pressure on a grid covering the VISTAS regional

12-km CALMET domain. The MM5 data was run at a horizontal spatial resolution of 12-km for

years 2001 and 2002 and 36-km for year 2003. For the VISTAS regional 12-km domain

CALMET runs have been made in the no-observational mode.



# 3.4 Air Quality Monitoring Data

CALPUFF uses hourly ozone concentration measurem ents in the chemical transformation rates

(SO 2 

# to SO 4 

# , NO

x 

# to HNO 3 

# /NO 3 

# ). The ambient ozone measurements are used in determining SO 2



# loss rates due to chemical transformation to sulfate and in determining NO

x 

# loss rates to nitrate.

Ambient ozone monitoring data from the U.S. EPA AIRS and CASTNET networks were used to

develop the hourly ozone monitoring data file (OZONE.DAT). Figure 3-4 provides a plot of

available ozone monitoring stations that were used for the CALPUFF modeling.

For the base case simulations, a constant ammoni a concentration of 0.5 parts per billion (ppb)

was assumed as recommended by the Intera gency Workgroup on Air Quality Modeling

(IWAQM, 1998) for forested Class I areas. In th is application of the model, the Ammonia

Limiting Method (ALM) was not used.

# Geophysical and Meteorological Data 3-5 

# 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400

LCC East (km) -1200 -1100 -1000

-900 -800 -700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200LCC North (km) 

# 1 2 3

4 5 6 7

8

9 10 11

12 13

14

15 16

17

18 19 20

21

22 23 24

LCC Origin: 40.0 N, 97.0 W

Standard Parallels : 33.0 N, 45.0 N

Datum: NWS-84 GA AL TN

SC NC VA

FL KY



# Cohutta Great Smoky Mountains

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock Linville Gorge

Okefenokee Shining Rock

Sipsey

St Marks

AL facility 

# 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Urban/

built-up land Agricultural

land Rangeland Forest land

Water Wetland Barren land

Tundra Snow / Ice



# Figure 3-3. Land Use for the CALPUFF computational subdomain. The Class I areas and the sites of

the Alabama facilities are also shown. .

# Geophysical and Meteorological Data 3-6 

# 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500

LCC East (km) -1300 -1200 -1100 -1000

-900 -800 -700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100LCC North (km)



# 1 2 3

4 5 6 7

8

9 10 11

12 13

14

15 16

17

18 19 20

21

22 23 24

LCC Origin: 40.0 N, 97.0 W

Standard Parallels: 33.0 N, 45.0 N

Datum: NWS-84 

# Elevation

(meters)

GA AL TN

SC NC VA

FL KY



# Cohutta Great Smoky Mountains

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock Linville Gorge

Okefenokee Shining Rock

Sipsey

St Marks 

# -25 0.1 50 100 150 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400

CALPUFF

computational domain

AL facility

Ozone data



# Figure 3-4. Plot of ozone stations used for the CALPUFF simulations. The Class I areas and the sites

of the Alabama facilities are also shown.

# 4. RESULTS

The results of the CALMET and CALPUFF modeling for twenty four BART-eligible facilities in

Alabama are presented in this section. The simula tions were conducted over the three year period

of 2001-2003. Modeling was conducted us ing the VISTAS 12-km gridded CALMET

meteorological data files. The POSTUTIL program was used to scale and sum the various

CALPUFF concentration files to obtain tota l concentrations. Emission rates of SO 2 

# , SO 4 

# , and

NO

x 

# were input directly to the CALPUFF model while the six particulate species defining

specific size categories were modeled as a unit emission rate (1 g/s) and then scaled source by

source using the POSTUTIL program. CALPOST Method 6 was used to compute the extinction

change in deciviews (dv) consistent with the procedures outlined in the VISTAS modeling

protocol using the IMPROVE method (CSU, 1996) as recommended by FLAG (2000).

Table 4-25 provides the monthly f(RH) values b ased on the centroid of the Class I area as

required for the application of Method 6. The last column in Tables 4-1 through 4-24 provides the

annual average background b

ext 

# values for each Class I area included in the analysis. For each

Class I area, the Rayleigh scattering coefficient of 10 Mm -1 

# was subtracted from the annual

average background b

ext 

# and resulting values were entered in CALPOST as BKSOIL.

Tables 4-1 through 4-24 summarize the maximum pr edicted extinction changes for 2001, 2002,

and 2003 for the Class I areas situated within a 300 km radius of each of the modeled sources.

The highest values of the extinction change along with number of exceedances of the 0.5 dv

threshold value are presented in the tables. For screening simulations using the 12-km CALMET

meteorological grid, the highest predicted cha nge in extinction is compared to the 0.5 dv

threshold. According to the VISTAS protocol, screening simulation results below 0.5 dv for all

three years indicates that facility is not subject to BART controls. For facilities failing the screen,

or those located relatively close to one or more Class I areas (usually within 50 km) the state has

recommended immediately using the more refine d 4-km CALMET meteorological grid. In the

refined simulations, the 98th percentile value of prediction change in extinction (i.e., the 8th

highest day) is compared to the 0.5 dv threshol d. If the highest 98th percentile value during the

three year simulation period is below the 0.5 dv threshold, the source is considered not subject to

BART controls.

Visibility results for the Sloss Industries Fiber Div, ACIPCO, U.S. Pipe-Bessemer, U.S. Steel,

Oak Grove Resources, 3M Company, Decatur Plant, Bowater-Coosa Pines, International PaperRiverdale, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Shell Chemical Co, Ciba Specialty Chemicals, Boise

White Paper, Smurfit Stone Brewton, Degussa Corp., Continental Carbon Company, Carmeuse

Lime&Stone, Inc are presented in Tables 4-2 th rough 4-7, 4-13 through 4-15 and 4-18 through

4-24. These tables show that the maximum predic ted extinction change for each of the Class I

areas are all below the 0.5 dv threshold value for the seventeen facilities listed above.

For the Lehigh Cement Company (Table 4-1), ma ximum predicted extinction change is below

0.5 dv in Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock for all thr ee years, while only one exceedance of 0.5 dv is

Results 4

- 1

# predicted in Cohutta in 2002 and one in Sipsey in 2003. For the National Cement Co (Table 4-8),

maximum predicted extinction change is below 0.5 dv in Great Smoky Mountains and, Joyce

Kilmer-Slickrock for all three modeled years, while there are two exceedances of 0.5 dv both in

Cohutta and Sipsey in 2002. Table 4-9 show s that CEMEX Demopolis, maximum predicted

extinction change is below 0.5 dv in Breton, and there is only one exceedances of 0.5 dv in

Sipsey in 2002. For the Mead Westvaco-Mahrt (Table 4-10), maximum predicted extinction

change is below 0.5 dv in Cohutta. The 0.5 dv threshold value was exceeded in Okefenokee (once

in 2002 and once in 2003), Sipsey (once in 2003) and St. Marks (twice in 2002). Table 4-11

shows that the 0.5 dv threshold value for the In ternational Paper-Prattville was exceeded once in

Cohutta in 2001, five times in Sipsey (3 times in 2001, once in 2002 and once in 2003) and twice

in St. Marks (once in 2001 and once in 2002). For the Fort James Operating Co (Table 4-12), the

threshold value of 0.5 dv was predicted to exceed only in 2001, once in Breton and once in

Sipsey. Table 4-16 shows that for the Internati onal Paper Co, Courtland, the threshold was not

exceeded in Cohutta, Great Smoky Mountains, J oyce Kilmer-Slickrock and Mammoth Cave. In

Sipsey, there were multiple exceedances of th e threshold for all three years. For the

Weyerhaeuser-Pine Hill, there were total of thr ee exceedances in Breton (one in 2002 and two in

2003, and four exceedances in Sipsey (one in 2001, one in 2002 and tw o in 2003). For this

facility, refined modeling could be performed for further analysis, although due to the magnitude

of the impacts, this was not done under VISTAS funding.

Results 4

- 2

# Table 4-1. Summary of Visibility Re sults for Lehigh Cement Company

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.148 (0 0) 0.531 (1 0) 0.126 (0 0) 21.39

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock 0.100 (0 0) 0.244 (0 0) 0.080 (0 0) 21.40

Sipsey 0.427 (0 0) 0.317 (0 0) 0.657 (1 0) 21.28



# Table 4-2. Summary of Visibility Re sults for Sloss Industries Fiber Div

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.028 (0 0) 0.027 (0 0) 0.014 (0 0) 21.39

Sipsey 0.069 (0 0) 0.088 (0 0) 0.066 (0 0) 21.28



# Table 4-3. Summary of Visibility Results for ACIPCO

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.018 (0 0) 0.017 (0 0) 0.018 (0 0) 21.39

Great Smoky Mountains 0.010 (0 0) 0.014 (0 0) 0.007 (0 0) 21.39

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock 0.011 (0 0) 0.009 (0 0) 0.008 (0 0) 21.40

Sipsey 0.082 (0 0) 0.075 (0 0) 0.076 (0 0) 21.28

Results 4

- 3

# Table 4-4. Summary of Visibilit y Results for U.S. Pipe-Bessemer

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.004 (0 0) 0.004 (0 0) 0.003 (0 0) 21.39

Sipsey 0.036 (0 0) 0.027 (0 0) 0.032 (0 0) 21.28



# Table 4-5. Summary of Visibility Results for U.S. Steel

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.022 (0 0) 0.035 (0 0) 0.029 (0 0) 21.39

Sipsey 0.185 (0 0) 0.146 (0 0) 0.205 (0 0) 21.28



# Table 4-6. Summary of Visibilit y Results for Oak Grove Resources

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.002 (0 0) 0.003 (0 0) 0.001 (0 0) 21.39

Sipsey 0.021 (0 0) 0.019 (0 0) 0.021 (0 0) 21.28

Results 4

- 4

# Table 4-7. Summary of Visibility Results for 3M Company, Decatur Plant

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.057 (0 0) 0.069 (0 0) 0.077 (0 0) 21.39

Great Smoky Mountains 0.032 (0 0) 0.048 (0 0) 0.048 (0 0) 21.39

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock 0.031 (0 0) 0.053 (0 0) 0.029 (0 0) 21.40

Mammoth Cave 0.062 (0 0) 0.067 (0 0) 0.075 (0 0) 21.58

Sipsey 0.402 (0 0) 0.337 (0 0) 0.377 (0 0) 21.28



# Table 4-8. Summary of Visibility Results for National Cement Co of AL

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.286 (0 0) 0.539 (2 0) 0.175 (0 0) 21.39

Great Smoky Mountains 0.087 (0 0) 0.135 (0 0) 0.099 (0 0) 21.39

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock 0.089 (0 0) 0.171 (0 0) 0.114 (0 0) 21.40

Sipsey 0.357 (0 0) 0.795 (2 0) 0.425 (0 0) 21.28



# Table 4-9. Summary of Visibilit y Results for CEMEX Demopolis

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.224 (0 0) 0.162 (0 0) 0.308 (0 0) 21.57

Sipsey 0.476 (0 0) 0.562 (1 0) 0.394 (0 0) 21.28

Results 4

- 5

# Table 4-10. Summary of Visibility Results for MeadWestvaco-Mahrt

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.412 (0 0) 0.414 (0 0) 0.411 (0 0) 21.39

Okefenokee 0.393 (0 0) 0.523 (1 0) 0.520 (1 0) 21.41

Sipsey 0.319 (0 0) 0.246 (0 0) 0.502 (1 0) 21.28

St Marks 0.385 (0 0) 0.846 (2 0) 0.492 (0 0) 21.54



# Table 4-11. Summary of Visibility Resu lts for International Paper-Prattville

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.536 (1 0) 0.326 (0 0) 0.242 (0 0) 21.39

Sipsey 0.604 (3 0) 0.809 (1 0) 0.516 (1 0) 21.28

St Marks 0.581 (1 0) 0.660 (1 0) 0.468 (0 0) 21.54



# Table 4-12. Summary of Visibility Results for Fort James Operating Co

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.683 (1 0) 0.341 (0 0) 0.455 (0 0) 21.57

Sipsey 0.590 (1 0) 0.453 (0 0) 0.261 (0 0) 21.28

Results 4

- 6

# Table 4-13. Summary of Visibility Results for Bowater-Coosa Pines

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.039 (0 0) 0.063 (0 0) 0.042 (0 0) 21.39

Great Smoky Mountains 0.018 (0 0) 0.026 (0 0) 0.022 (0 0) 21.39

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock 0.017 (0 0) 0.025 (0 0) 0.020 (0 0) 21.40

Sipsey 0.166 (0 0) 0.102 (0 0) 0.132 (0 0) 21.28



# Table 4-14. Summary of Visibility Resu lts for International Paper-Riverdale

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.192 (0 0) 0.098 (0 0) 0.146 (0 0) 21.57

Sipsey 0.221 (0 0) 0.246 (0 0) 0.184 (0 0) 21.28



# Table 4-15. Summary of Visibility Result s for Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.041 (0 0) 0.059 (0 0) 0.044 (0 0) 21.57

Results 4

- 7

# Table 4-16. Summary of Visibility Result s for International Paper Co, Courtland

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.192 (0 0) 0.341 (0 0) 0.468 (0 0) 21.39

Great Smoky Mountains 0.175 (0 0) 0.191 (0 0) 0.231 (0 0) 21.39

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock 0.161 (0 0) 0.203 (0 0) 0.156 (0 0) 21.40

Mammoth Cave 0.359 (0 0) 0.407 (0 0) 0.433 (0 0) 21.58

Sipsey 1.732 (67 23) 2.108 (59 24) 2.392 (62 25) 21.28



# Table 4-17. Summary of Visibility Results for Weyerhaeuser-Pine Hill

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.386 (0 0) 0.584 (1 0) 0.582 (2 0) 21.57

Sipsey 0.749 (1 0) 0.570 (1 0) 0.602 (2 0) 21.28



# Table 4-18. Summary of Visibility Results for Shell Chemical Co

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.025 (0 0) 0.057 (0 0) 0.066 (0 0) 21.57

Results 4

- 8

# Table 4-19. Summary of Visibility Re sults for Ciba Specialty Chemicals

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.067 (0 0) 0.049 (0 0) 0.134 (0 0) 21.57



# Table 4-20. Summary of Visibilit y Results for Boise White Paper

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.139 (0 0) 0.154 (0 0) 0.162 (0 0) 21.57

Sipsey 0.086 (0 0) 0.097 (0 0) 0.068 (0 0) 21.28



# Table 4-21. Summary of Visibility Results for Smurfit Stone Brewton

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.295 (0 0) 0.186 (0 0) 0.184 (0 0) 21.57

St. Marks 0.114 (0 0) 0.152 (0 0) 0.176 (0 0) 21.54

Results 4

- 9

# Table 4-22. Summary of Visib ility Results for Degussa Corp.

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Breton 0.192 (0 0) 0.422 (0 0) 0.466 (0 0) 21.57



# Table 4-23. Summary of Visibility Resu lts for Continental Carbon Company

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.006 (0 0) 0.005 (0 0) 0.005 (0 0) 21.39

Okefenokee 0.005 (0 0) 0.003 (0 0) 0.004 (0 0) 21.41

Sipsey 0.005 (0 0) 0.005 (0 0) 0.004 (0 0) 21.28

St Marks 0.004 (0 0) 0.007 (0 0) 0.004 (0 0) 21.54



# Table 4-24. Summary of Visibility Result s for Carmeuse Lime & Stone, Inc.

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Annual

average

background

b ext



# Maximum delta-deciview, (# days>0.5 dv, # days >1 dv) (Mm -1 

# )

Cohutta 0.047 (0 0) 0.070 (0 0) 0.025 (0 0) 21.39

Sipsey 0.140 (0 0) 0.215 (0 0) 0.165 (0 0) 21.28

Results 4

- 10

# Results 4

- 11 

# Table 4-25. Monthly f(RH) Values Based on the Centroid of the Area, for Visibility Method 6

Applications

Class I area Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Cohutta 3.3 3.1 3.0 2.8 3.4 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.2 3.8 3.4 3.5

Great Smoky Mountains 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.7 3.2 3.9 3.8 4.0 4.2 3.8 3.3 3.4

Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 3.3 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.2 3.8 3.3 3.5

Linville Gorge 3.3 3.0 3.0 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.1 4.5 4.4 3.7 3.2 3.4

Okefenokee 3.5 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.7 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.6

Shining Rock 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.7 3.4 3.9 4.1 4.5 4.4 3.8 3.3 3.4

Sipsey 3.4 3.1 2.9 2.8 3.3 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.3 3.4

St. Marks 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 4.0 4.1 4.4 4.2 3.8 3.7 3.8

Source: Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Unde r the Regional Haze Rule (2003), Appendix A, Table A-3

# 5. REFERENCES

CSU, 1996: IMPROVE (Interagency Monitoring of Protected Environments). Spatial and

Seasonal patterns and Long Term Variability of the Composition of the Haze in the

United States: An Analysis of Data from the IMPROVE Network. ISSN: 0737-5352-32.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1998: Interagency Workgroup on Air Quality

Modeling (IWAQM), Phase 2 Report: Summary Report and Recommendation for

Modeling Long Range Transport and Imp acts on Regional Visibility. U.S. EPA,

Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-454/R-98-019.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2003: Guidance for Estimati ng Natural Visibility

Conditions under the Regional Haze Program . U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC,

EPA-454/B-03-005.

FLAG, 2000: Federal Land Managers’ Air Quality Related Values Workgroup (FLAG). Phase I

report.

Grell, G.A., J.Dudhia, and D.R. Stauffer, 1995: “A Description of the Fifth Generation Penn

State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5)”, NCAR TN-398-STR, NCAR Technical Note.

Scire, J.S., D.G. Strimaitis, and R.J. Ya martino, 2000a: A User’s Guide for the CALPUFF

Dispersion Model (Version 5). Earth Tech, Inc., Concord, MA. Available from

http://www.src.com

.

Scire, J.S., F.R. Robe, M.E. Fernau, and R.J. Yamartino, 2000b: A User’s Guide for the

CALMET Meteorological Model (Version 5). Ea rth Tech, Inc., Concord, MA. Available

from http://www.src.com

.

VISTAS, 2006: Protocol for the Application of the CALPUFF Model for Analyses of Best

Available Retrofit Technology (BART). Revision 3.2, August 2006. Available from

http://www.vistas-sesarm.org

.

References 5

- 1