alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 11 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 11

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, 
 Mr. Duncan, Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Meuser, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Balderson, Mr. 
 Weber of Texas, Mr. Keller, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Mr. Babin, Mr. Katko, 
Mr. Pfluger, Mr. Feenstra, and Mr. Carl) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine 
justices.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 2:18-cr-00094-MHW Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/10/18 Page: 1 of 8  PAGEID #: 82

Case: 2:18-cr-00094-MHW Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/10/18 Page: 2 of 8  PAGEID #: 83

Case: 2:18-cr-00094-MHW Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/10/18 Page: 3 of 8  PAGEID #: 84

Case: 2:18-cr-00094-MHW Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/10/18 Page: 4 of 8  PAGEID #: 85

Case: 2:18-cr-00094-MHW Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/10/18 Page: 5 of 8  PAGEID #: 86

Case: 2:18-cr-00094-MHW Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/10/18 Page: 6 of 8  PAGEID #: 87

Case: 2:18-cr-00094-MHW Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/10/18 Page: 7 of 8  PAGEID #: 88

Case: 2:18-cr-00094-MHW Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/10/18 Page: 8 of 8  PAGEID #: 89
Marcus B. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. William F. CRENSHAW, CEO of Publix Supermarkets, Inc., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4554

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

VILLANTI, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lawrence M. Higby, Chief Executive Officer of the company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ LAWRENCE M. HIGBY Lawrence M. Higby
Chief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the Securities and Exhange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Order entered June 1 8 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00447

- CR

EX PARTE DONTE TAYLOR

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 02294

- 2021

O RDER

The Court has filed a pp e l l a nt’s not i c e of a p p ea l f

r om the tri a l c ourt ’ s ord e r
denying r e l i e f on his pretrial a ppl i ca t i on for w r it of h a b e a s c orpus seeking a

reduction on his bond . This is a n ac c e le ra t e d a pp e a l and is g ov e rn e d b y T e x a s R ule

of App e l l a te P r o c e dure 3 1.

W e ORDER the tri a l c ourt to pr e p a r e a c e rtifi ca t ion of a pp e l l a nt’s r i g ht to

a pp ea l a nd t o file it with the clerk’s record.

W e ORDER the C o l l i n Coun t y Distri c t Cle r k to file the c le r

k’s r e c o rd

b y July 2 , 2021

. We ORDER that the clerk’s record contain copies of the charging

instrument
, any documents related to bond conditions or bond proceedings, the– 2

–

application for writ of habeas corpus, any response to the writ application filed by
the State, any othe r documents related to the writ application, the trial court’s order

ruling on the writ application, any findings of fact on the writ application that the

trial court has entered, the certification of appellant’s right to appeal , and any other

documents fi led with the clerk that the parties request

.

We ORDER the court reporter to file, by July 2 , 2021 , either the reporter’s

record of the hearing on the writ application or written verification that no hearing

was conducted.

We ORDER appellant’s brief filed b y July 23 , 2021 . We ORDER the State
to file its brief by August 13 , 2021 . If appellant desires to file a reply brief, it must
be filed within ten days after the filing of the State’s brief. After the record and
briefs are filed, the Court will notify the p arties by letter of the submission date and
panel.

W e DI R ECT the Cl e rk to s e nd c opies of th i s ord e r to the Hono ra b l e Andrea
Thompson
, P r e sid i ng J ud g e , 416th Judicial District Court; Destiny M. Moses
,

o f f ici a l c ourt r e port e r, 416th Judicial District Court; Lynne Finley, Collin C ou n t y

District C le r k; and c ouns e l for a l l pa r t i e s.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1

I, T. Stephen Thompson, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Immtech
International, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

      Date: November 14, 2003

         /s/ T. Stephen Thompson
         ----------------------------------------------------------------
              T. Stephen Thompson
              President & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit No. 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of United Retail Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended May 1, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), we, Raphael Benaroya, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and George R. Remeta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that
based on our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                                                                 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ RAPHAEL BENAROYARaphael BenaroyaChief Executive OfficerJune 14, 2004/s/ GEORGE R. REMETAGeorge R. RemetaChief Financial OfficerJune 14, 2004 | 
|                                                                                                                                                 |
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 27 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of

              

 Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 
Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the term 
of David M. Rubenstein of Maryland on May 7, 2021, is filled by the 
appointment of Barbara M. Barrett of Arizona. The appointment is for a 
term of 1,912 days, beginning on May 8, 2021, or the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs later.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
Johnny D. WHITFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Chamblee v. Stokes.

Pleading : *Exhibits, when part of complaint.*

In an action by a mortgagee for the recovery of personal property, claiming to be the owner by virtue of the mortgage, the mortgage is not the foundation of the action, and though filed with the complaint, is no part of it but is simply evidence for the plaintiff to be used at the trial.

APPEAL from *Arkansas*Circuit Court.

Hon. JOHN A. Williams, Circuit Judge.

HarRISON, J.:

This was an action of replevin for a horse, commenced before a justice of the peace.

The cause of action was stated in the complaint, as follows:

“ The plaintiff, J. W. Chamblee, states that he is the owner *544by virtue of a certain deed of trust or chattel mortgage executed by James L. Bigham to plaintiff on the 22d day of' March, 1875, and entitled to the possession of one sorrel horse, about six years old, and known by the name of Poodle ;- that the said horse is worth ninety dollars ; that the defendant,. T. J. Stokes, has possession of said horse without right, and. has unlawfully detained him from the plaintiff for one month.”

And the prayer was for the recovery of the possession of the horse and the sum of twenty-five dollars damages for his. detention.

The mortgage mentioned in the complaint was filed with the justice.

The plaintiff recovered judgment before the justice and the-defendant appealed to the Circuit Court.

In the Circuit Court the defendant filed a demurrer to the-complaint, upon the grounds :

1. That the complaint and the exhioit with the same, did not show a sufficient cause of action. 2. That the mortgage,, which it averred was the foundation of the action, was informal, vague, uncertain and insufficient. 8. That the mortgage-did not state or show in which county the property was ; and 4. That the mortgage was usurious and void.

The court. sustained the demurrer, and judgment was rendered for the defendant.

The plaintiff appealed to this court.

The mortgage was not, as the demurrer assumes, the foundation of the action, and it was, though filed with it, no part of the complaint. It was simply evidence for the plaintiff, to be used at the trial. *Newm. Plead. and Prac.,*251, 619; *Vanghn*v. *Mills,*18 B. Mon., 634; *Dodd*v. *King,*1 Met., (Ky.) 430.

The facts stated in the complaint, without any reference to *545the mortgage, show a cause of action, and the demurrer .should have been overruled.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         3,721,350
<SECURITIES>                                   735,958
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,751,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,920,877
<INVENTORY>                                    755,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,641,803
<PP&E>                                         34,758,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,894,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 41,839,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,335,479
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,874,926
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,629,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   41,839,860
<SALES>                                        260,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               827,964
<CGS>                                          98,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  98,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,018,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,663,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,953,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,953,621)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Second Amendment to
                              Amended and Restated
                    Certificate of Limited Partnership of
                Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership I-F

      The undersigned,  desiring to amend its amended and restated certificate
of limited  partnership  pursuant  to the  Oklahoma  Revised  Uniform  Limited
Partnership Act, as amended,  Okla.  Stat. tit. 54 (1993),  Section 301 et seq
(the "Act"), do hereby state:

      1.  The  name  of the  limited  partnership  is  Geodyne  Energy  Income
Limited Partnership I-F.

      2. The date of filing of the original Certificate and Agreement of Limited
Partnership  was  September  10,  1986,  as amended by the Amended and  Restated
Certificate of Limited  Partnership of Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership
I-F filed on March 10, 1989,  and as further  amended by the First  Amendment to
Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of Geodyne Energy Income
Limited Partnership I-F filed on February 25, 1993.

      3.  The Amended  and  Restated  Certificate  of Limited  Partnership  is
hereby revised to change the name of the General Partner and Registered  Agent
from Geodyne Properties, Inc. to the following:

                             Geodyne Resources, Inc.

Geodyne  Properties,  Inc. merged with Geodyne  Resources,  Inc., with Geodyne
Resources, Inc. surviving, effective June 30, 1996.

     DATED:    July 1, 1996
                                        Geodyne Properties, Inc.
                                        by Geodyne Resources,  Inc., successor
                                        by merger

                                        By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Dennis R. Neill
                                          President

                                        Geodyne Resources, Inc.
                                        as General Partner

                                        By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Dennis R. Neill
                                          President



                                      -1-
<PAGE>



                                        Geodyne     Resources,     Inc.,    as
                                        Attorney-in-Fact   for   all   Limited
                                        Partners

                                        By:  /s/ Dennis R. Neill
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Dennis R. Neill
                                          President




                                      -2-
Robert Harold BITTLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D15-2956

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
p. 1 

# ~Aftory

C H E M I C A L

March 3, 2011 

## 3336b8 ~~/'05,j/ RECEIVED

'(l . 

## RECD MAR 1 5 2011 I I MAR -8 AM 6

: 00

Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution, Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) Document Control Officer (7407 M) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave ., NW Washington, DC 20430-0001 Attention: TSCA Section 4 Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 Subject : Letter of Intent to Test - TSCA Section 4 Final Rule To Whom

It May Concern: This letter is in reference to Federal Register Volume 76, Number 5 published January 7, 2011 (Federal Register Notice) concerning the testing of certain HPV Chemicals. This is to inform you that Afton Chemical Corporation (Afton) is a Tier 1 manufacturer of castor oil, sulfated, sodium salt (CASRN 68187-76-8) and that Afton intends to test this substance as indicated in the Federal Register Notice for all tests specified by EPA for this chemical substance (attached)

. When all letters of intent to test are published in the public docket, Afton intends to contact other Tier 1 Manufacturers/Importers that may be common to this chemical substance regarding completion of the full set of specified testing . If you require any further information, please feel free to contact me. 

# impq~pimpq~iupi~iMipu2 Sincerely, Mark S. Grenda Regulatory Affairs Attachment 

## CONTAINS NOCBI

500Spring Street " Richmond, Virginia 23219 " tel : 804.788.6035 " fax: 804 .788.6038 " Mark. Grenda@AftonChemical .com

Afton Chemical CorporationAttachment - Afton Letter of Intent to Test

Tier 1 Testing requirements for Castor Oil, sulfated, sodiumsalt (CAS 68187-76-8) 1 . Melting Point : ASTME 324-99 ; if a Freezing Point : OECD 102 2. Boiling Point : ASTME 1719-05 3. Aquatic toxicity: a . Chronic Toxicity to Daphnia: ASTME 1193-97 b . Toxicity to Plants (Algae) : ASTME 1218-04 4. Mammalian toxicity, acute, EITHER: a . Acute (Up/Down) Oral Toxicity (rat) : ASTM E 1163-98 OR b . Acute (Up/Down) Oral Toxicity (rat) : OECD 425 5. Mammalian toxicity, genotox: a . Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test : 40 CFR 799.9510 AND b . Any one of the following: i . In vitro Mammalian ChromAb: 40 CFR 799.9537 (preferred) OR (must justify) ii . Mammalian Bone MarrowChromAb : 40 CFR 799.9538 OR iii . Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test : 40 CFR 799.9539 6 . Mammalian toxicity, repeated dose/reproduction/ developmental : a . Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test : 40 CFR 799.9365 OR (must justify) b . Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test : 40 CFR 799.9355 AND c. Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in rodents : 40 CFR 799.9305
A.Z., Mother of K.V., K.V., and M.V., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3392

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2018

Edward Juan Lynum, of Lynum & Associates, PLLC, Leesburg, for Appellant.

Stephanie C. Zimmerman, of Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, and Rachel Batten, of Children's Legal Services, Brooksville, for Appellee.

Beth Kathryn Roland, of Friedman & Friedman, P.A., Lake Mary, and David P. Krupski, and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Sanford, for Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Porfirio Correa TORRES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-206

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.