alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10_25.htm


     EXHIBIT
10.25 

     

     LOCK-UP
AGREEMENT 

    


     As an
inducement to Liberty Alliance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to
issue a number of shares of the Company common stock to increase the undersigned
stockholder’s holding to one round lot, or 100 shares, after the 1 for 3.5
reverse stock split effected on July 18, 2008 (the “Effective Date”), the
undersigned stockholder hereby agrees that from the Effective Date for a period
of one year,(the “Lock-up Period”) the undersigned will not offer, sell,
contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly (a
“Transfer”), any shares of capital stock of the Company issued to the
undersigned in respect of shares of the Company now owned or hereafter acquired
by the undersigned, including any securities convertible into or exchangeable or
exercisable for any shares of capital stock of the Company (the “Securities”),
or enter into a transaction which would have the same effect, or publicly
disclose the intention to make any such offer, sale, pledge or
disposal. 

     

     Any
Securities received upon exercise of options granted to the undersigned will
also be subject to this Agreement.  A transfer of Securities to a
family member or trust may be made, provided the transferee agrees to be bound
in writing by the terms of this Agreement.  Upon the execution of the
Agreement, there shall be imprinted or otherwise placed, on certificates
representing the Securities the following restrictive legend: 

    


     THE
SALE OR TRANSFER OF THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE IS SUBJECT TO
THE TERMS AND CONDITONS OF A CERTAIN LOCK-UP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPORATION
AND CERTAIN HOLDERS OF STOCK OF THE CORPORATION.  COPIES OF SUCH
AGREEMENT MAY BE OBTAINED UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO THE SECRETARY OF THE
CORPORATION. 

    


     In
furtherance of the foregoing, the Company and its transfer agent and registrar
are hereby authorized to decline to make any transfer of shares of Securities if
such transfer would constitute a violation or breach of this
Agreement. 

    


     This
Lock-up Agreement shall be binding on the undersigned and the successors, heirs,
personal representatives and assigns of the undersigned. 

    


     

     

    
      	  
      	  
      	  
      	  
      
	  
      	  
      	
               Name 

            	  
      
	  
      	  
      	  
      	  
      
	  
      	  
      	  
      	  
      
	  
      	  
      	
               Address
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882343
<NAME> 90BC
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         146,642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  191,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               337,836
<PP&E>                                       9,627,030
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,016,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,948,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,378
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,903,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,948,313
<SALES>                                      1,092,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,102,576
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  526,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                576,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            576,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   576,295
<EPS-BASIC>                                      47.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1


                                   CONSENT


We have issued our reports dated March 15, 2002, except for the last paragraph
of Note H, as to which the date is April 4, 2002, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Flanders
Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
We hereby consent to the incorporation of said reports by reference in the
Registration Statement of Flanders Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8
(File No. 333-31667, effective July 21, 1997).



			                    /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



Salt Lake City, Utah
March 15, 2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

JOSHUA MAXTON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

BILL HILBERT, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Case No. 1:18-cv-372 

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman 

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

 The parties in this action have settled their claims. This case is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice, with each party paying its own costs. 

The terms of the settlement agreement include an Audit by a Special Master of a subset 

of cases investigated by the City of Cincinnati Police Department of CODIS reports which 

identify DNA of an individual other than the charged suspect where the suspect was convicted of 

a homicide from June 2011 through June 2018, including the case of Plaintiff Joshua Maxton, as 

set forth in the Settlement Agreement. This Court hereny retains jurisdiction to enforce the 

settlement agreement, pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

___s/Michael R. Barrett_______________ 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 1:18-cv-00372-MRB-SKB Doc #: 25 Filed: 09/10/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 138
Elliot YARO, Appellant, v. Scott J. ISRAEL, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Broward County, Appellee.

No. 4D17-928

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 4, 2018]

G. Ware Cornell, Jr. of Cornell & Associates, P.A., Weston, for appellant.

Carmen Rodriguez of the Law Offices of Carmen Rodriguez, P.A., Palmetto Bay, for appellee.

**ON MOTION FOR REHEARING**

Warner, J.

The motion for rehearing is granted, and the prior opinion is vacated. The following opinion is substituted in its place.

Appellant sued the Broward County Sheriff for disability and age discrimination after he was demoted from his position as a child protective investigator with the Sheriff's office. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the sheriff on both claims. We affirm the judgment in its entirety.

As to the disability discrimination claim, the trial court correctly disposed of this based upon the contradiction in appellant's deposition of the material allegations of his complaint. As to the claim of age discrimination, we affirm based on *Hazen Paper Company v. Biggins* , 507 U.S. 604, 611, 113 S.Ct. 1701, 123 L.Ed.2d 338 (1993), where the Supreme Court found that termination of an employee to prevent his pension benefits from vesting did not violate the ADEA because it was not related to age, but to his pension status; actions under the ADEA must be based on age discrimination, not solely on a motivating factor that is only correlated with age). *See**Broaddus v. Fla. Power Corp.* , 145 F.3d 1283, 1287 (11th Cir. 1998) ("The ADEA does not prohibit an employer from making an employment decision on the basis of higher salaries, increased benefits, pension status, or claims for medical expenses even though these characteristics *1141are often correlated with an employee's age."). Here, based upon appellant's own testimony, a major in the department told him that he was being demoted to use his higher salary to employ more investigators. Thus, while his higher salary may be correlated to age, age was not the reason for his demotion. Appellant made his claims under the Florida Civil Rights Act, but we apply federal case law interpreting the ADEA to cases arising under the FCRA. *See**City of Hollywood v. Hogan* , 986 So.2d 634, 641 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

*Affirmed.*

Taylor and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          55,836
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  668,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                   105,296
<INVENTORY>                                     38,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               780,662
<PP&E>                                       1,241,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                 317,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,982,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,708,722
<BONDS>                                        829,532
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           733
<OTHER-SE>                                     275,488
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,982,811
<SALES>                                      1,287,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,287,390
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,312,788
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (116,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (117,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (117,776)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.61)
        

</TABLE>
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0689

 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-225-AD

84-32-108 --- 9/6/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID FEMA-2020-0016]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Announcement of meetings; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 6, 2022, concerning four meetings under the Plan of Action to Establish a National Strategy for the Coordination of National Multimodal Healthcare Supply Chains to Respond to COVID-19. The document contained an incorrect date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Robert Glenn, Office of Business, Industry, Infrastructure Integration, via email at                         *OB3I@fema.dhs.gov*                         or via phone at (202) 212-1666.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of January 6, 2022, in FR Doc. 87-784, on page 784, in the second column, correct the                     **DATES**                     caption to read:                

### Dates

    - Wednesday, January 5, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Time (ET).
    - Wednesday, January 12, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.
    - Wednesday, January 19, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.
    - Wednesday, February 2, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.

Dated: January 26, 2022.

Shabnaum Q. Amjad,

Deputy Associate Chief Counsel, Regulatory Affairs Division, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-01940 Filed 1-31-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-19-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  266,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                    36,731
<INVENTORY>                                     20,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,853
<PP&E>                                         504,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                 205,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 881,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          142,268
<BONDS>                                        309,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           203
<OTHER-SE>                                     366,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   881,557
<SALES>                                        853,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               853,953
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  777,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,445
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.82
        

</TABLE>
Social Cost of Carbon | The White House

https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/oira/social-cost-of-carbon [8/18/2015 12:28:25 PM] Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget



# Social Cost of Carbon

Most of the documents on this page were created as PDFs Click here for PDF assistance

Blog Post: Estimating the Benefits from Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reductions (July 2, 2015)

Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis (July 2, 2015) (21 pages, 1.2 mb)

Response to Comments on November 2013 Federal Register Notice (July 2, 2015) (44 pages, 1.06 mb)

Federal Register Notice: Request for Comment on the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis (November 26, 2013)

Blog Post: Refining Estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon (November 1, 2013)

Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis (November 1, 2013) (22 pages, 343 kb)

Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis (May 2013) (21 pages, 745 kb)

Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis (February 2010) (51 pages, 848 kb) 

### About OMBlog Budget Management Regulation & Information Intellectual Property Legislative Join Contact

HOME

BRIEFING ROOM From the News Room Latest News Share-Worthy Photos Video Gallery Live Events Music & Arts Performances From the Press Office Your Weekly Address Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases White House Schedule Presidential Actions Legislation ISSUES Popular Topics 2015 State of the Union Immigration Action Raise the Wage See All Top Issues Economy Education Foreign Policy Health Care Immigration Climate Change Energy and Environment Civil Rights More Defense Disabilities 

#         the WHITE HOUSE PR esi D e N t ba R a CK obama Contact Us Get Email Updates



### BRIEFING ROOM ISSUES THE ADMINISTRATION PARTICIPATE 1600 PENNSocial Cost of Carbon | The White House

https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/oira/social-cost-of-carbon [8/18/2015 12:28:25 PM] Nominations & Appointments Disclosures Ethics Equal Pay Homeland Security Refinancing Rural Service More Seniors & Social Security Taxes Technology Trade Urban and Economic Mobility Veterans Violence Prevention Women THE ADMINISTRATION People President Barack Obama Vice President Joe Biden First Lady Michelle Obama Jill Biden The Cabinet
Louis Danwood CHANDLER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2592

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 5, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Ciklin, Levine and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  0000798783
<NAME> UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,158
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         147,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         26,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,770
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,417
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,584
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
        

</TABLE>
The Army National Guard is in an inflection point. As threats to the United States 

emerge, we must focus on our future safety and security.

Why do we need ARNG 4.0?

The need for a new framework in the ARNG is derived from three factors: 1) Emergent threats, 2) a 

smaller active component and 3) resource challenges—all of which place additional expectations on 

the ARNG.

How will ARNG 4.0 build readiness?

ARNG 4.0 builds on 16 years of experience as an operational reserve to build new programs and 

prioritize existing programs into cycles of focused readiness. The ARNG will allocate additional training 

days and resources to select units required in the early phases of any contingency. Simultaneously, a 

portion of the remaining force will increase their training activities at a slower rate to raise the 

aggregate readiness of the entire ARNG over time. ARNG 4.0 increases ARNG participation in 

Combat Training Center rotations at Fort Irwin and Fort Polk, warfighter staff exercises and Exportable 

Combat Training Center (xCTC) exercises. ARNG Combat Training Center rotations will increase from 

two to four in FY18 and xCTC rotations will increase from five to seven by FY19.

What does ARNG 4.0 look like?

ARNG 4.0 has varied effects on our units and Soldiers. For many of our ARNG Soldiers, the 39 

training days a year commitment will remain the same. Selected high-priority units are slated to 

incrementally build readiness over a four year period. Over time, training days increase from 39 to as 

many as 63 days per year, focusing on collective training exercises. Units and states will have 

resources and flexibility to ensure they can meet their readiness objectives. 

Opportunities for Soldiers

ARNG 4.0 emphasizes individual Soldier readiness through occupational and professional 

development opportunities. ARNG 4.0 offers increased opportunities for the kinds of tough, realistic 

training the Army depends upon. For many Soldiers, the opportunity to train at a Combat Training 

Center or deploy is a retention factor. ARNG 4.0’s increased training time will not only directly prepare 

Soldiers for the missions they are needed for overseas, it will directly prepare them to respond to 

domestic crisis in their own communities.

READY TO FIGHT AND WIN 

 ARNG 4.0