alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7(c)






Exhibit 10.7(c)




VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC

1310 Goshen Parkway

PO Box 2656

West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380




December 18, 2008




Ted Pulkownik

716 Silvermine Road

New Canaan, CT 06840




Dear Ted:



In order to comply with final regulations under §409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, the terms of your employment agreement dated June 29, 2007, are hereby revised as follows:



The second and third paragraphs of the section entitled “Severance/Restrictive Covenants”
are revised to read as follows:




If you incur a Disability (as defined on Annex 1), you will be entitled to
receive a lump-sum payment, as soon as practicable following your Disability but in
no event later than March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year in
which such Disability is incurred, in an amount equal to the target amount of your
bonus for the year in which such Disability is incurred, prorated for the portion of
such year during which you were employed with VWR. In addition, you shall be
entitled to receive payments of your base salary until payments to you under VWR’s
long-term disability plan commence but in any event for a period not to exceed 18
months from the date of your termination of employment.




If your employment with VWR and its affiliates is terminated by reason of your
death, your beneficiary or estate, as applicable, will be entitled to receive a
lump-sum payment as soon as practicable following your death but in no event later
than March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which your death
occurs, in an amount equal to the target amount of your bonus for the year in which
your death occurs, prorated for the portion of such year during which you were
employed with VWR.



If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (610) 692-1060.




Sincerely,




/s/
John Ballbach                     
                         
John Ballbach



Accepted and Agreed:



	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/
Ted Pulkownik
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Ted Pulkownik	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:
	 	12/18/08
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marx Toys and Entertainment Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"),
I, Robert Bamberry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Robert Bamberry
Chief Financial Officer
November 22, 2004
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1150 

To codify the Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs of the 

Department of Labor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2021 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. PALMER, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. KELLER, 

Mr. LONG, Mr. HILL, and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To codify the Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 

of the Department of Labor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Modernizing America’s 

5 Apprenticeship Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INDUSTRY-RECOGNIZED APPRENTICESHIP PRO7 GRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. 

8 The provisions of part 29 of title 29, Code of Federal 

9 Regulations, as amended by the final regulations entitled 

10 ‘‘Apprenticeship Programs, Labor Standards for RegistraVerDate Sep 11 2014 16:45 Mar 13, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1150.IH H1150

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1150 IH

1 tion, Amendment of Regulations’’ published by the De2 partment of Labor in the Federal Register on March 11, 

3 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 14294 et seq.), and as in effect on 

4 the day before the date of enactment of this Act, shall 

5 have the force and effect of enacted law. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
March 25, 2015

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary of Transportation US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable John F. Kerry Secretary of State US Department of State

2201 C Street NW Washingto n, DC 20520

Dear Secretaries Foxx and Kerry,

I am writing to express my growing concern regarding the anti

- competitive practices of the nations of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, who are massively subsidizing their state

- owned airlines

— Q atar Airway s, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline . This unfair government support has given those airlines an unfair competitive advantage and has created a situation that adversely affects the U.S. airline industry and those that depend on it for employment.

Over the last decade, Q atar, Etihad, and Emirates have received over 42 billion dollars from their respective governments according to a recent report put out by the Partnership for Open & Fair Skies . The report, Restoring Open Skies: The

Need to Address Subsid ized Competition from State

- Owned Airlines in Qatar
and the UAE, shines a light on how the highly subsidized Gulf carriers are distorting the free

- market framework established by the Open Skies agreements and how this will ultimately have a negative econom ic impact on the United

States.

For example, the state

- owned Gulf carriers’ have been able to expand rapidly, taking market share from the U.S. carriers which, as private entities, are simply unable to compete with carriers backed by their states. This competitive imbalance undermines the intent of the Open Skies agreements and jeopardizes U.S. jobs. In fact, each international roundtrip flight that the U.S. loses to a Gulf carrier results in an average loss of 821 U.S. jobs.At the Alliance for a Gre ater New York (ALIGN), our mission is to create good jobs, vibrant communities, and to build a more just and sustainable New York. This would be all but impossible to accomplish without a robust airline industry. As you know, New York is home to some of th e U.S.’s busiest international airports, and carriers like American Airlines employ approximately 8,060 people in the New York area. It is imperative that all appropriate actions are taken to ensure that these jobs are protected, and that a competitive bal ance between U.S. and Gulf carriers is restored so that more jobs can be created in the future.

Sincerely,

Matt Ryan Executive Director, ALIGN

cc :

Senator Chuck Schumer

Senator Kirstin Gillibrand Rep. Joseph Crowley Rep. Gregory Meeks Rep. Grace M eng Rep. Jerrold Nadler Rep. Jose Serrano Mayor Bill de Blasio
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1021 

To prohibit contributions to the United Nations Human Rights Council, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2021 

Mr. ROY (for himself, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BABIN, Mr. WEBER

of Texas, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. MOORE

of Alabama, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. BIGGS, Mrs. GREENE of Georgia, Mr. 

JACKSON, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. PERRY, Mr. 

MCCLINTOCK, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, and Mr. BUDD) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit contributions to the United Nations Human 

Rights Council, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No taxpayer funding 

5 for United Nations Human Rights Council Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, the Secretary of State— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1021 IH

1 (1) shall withhold from a United States con2 tribution each fiscal year to a regular budget of the 

3 United Nations an amount that is equal to the per4 centage of such contribution that the Secretary de5 termines would be allocated by the United Nations 

6 to support the United Nations Human Rights Coun7 cil; and 

8 (2) may not make any voluntary contributions 

9 to the United Nations Human Rights Council. 

10 (b) RESCISSION.—On the date the Secretary of State 

11 withholds funds pursuant to this section, such funds are 

12 rescinded and shall not be considered arrears to be repaid 

13 to any United Nations Entity. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Christopher BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4442

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony Paul CAMINITA

No. 2016-KO-2045

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.
Extension of Executive Employment Agreement, Edward T. Holleran



 Exhibit 10.22 
 EXECUTION COPY 
 EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Extension”) is made as of February 28, 2009 by and between Atlantic Broadband Management, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and Edward Holleran (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered an
Executive Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) which will expire on February 28, 2009; 
 WHEREAS the Company and
Executive desire to enter into a new employment agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to extend the terms of the Agreement on an interim
basis for a period of six months to allow parties sufficient time to enter a new agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 Section 1. Extension of Employment Period The Employment Period shall be extended for a period of six months, beginning on the date of this Extension, unless terminated earlier under the provisions of Section 5
(a) (ii) – (iii) or by execution of a new employment agreement by Company and Executive. The term “fifth anniversary” is amended to read “fifth anniversary plus six months” wherever it appears in the
Agreement. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unamended. 
 Section 2. Retroactive Effect The terms and consideration as agreed to
by Company and Executive in a new employment agreement to be entered into following the date hereof shall apply retroactively to March 1, 2009. 
 Section 3. Capitalized Terms Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement. 
 Section 4.
Governing Law. Issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Extension will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any
choice of law or conflict of law rules or provisions (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware. In furtherance of the foregoing, the
internal law of the State of Delaware will control the interpretation and construction of this Extension, even though under Delaware’s choice of law or conflict of law analysis, the substantive law of some other jurisdiction would ordinarily
apply. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension of Executive Employment Agreement as of the date
first written above. 
  

			
	ATLANTIC BROADBAND MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	
	
	  

	Edward Holleran
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1041 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1041

                      To repeal the debt ceiling.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2021

  Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                      To repeal the debt ceiling.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DEBT CEILING.

    Sections 3101 and 3101A of title 31, United States Code, are hereby 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
David Lee SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2726

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Rodney BOWDEN v. STATE

CR-15-0817

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Summary of Meeting between A4A and ACI

- NA

June 3, 2014

List of Attendees

Peter Ford, EPA

Kevin Weiss, EPA
Erika Farris, EPA
Bryan Rittenhouse, EPA

Chris Oswal, ACI

- NA
Tim Pohle, A4A
Jeff Longsworth, Barnes & Thornburg
Marianne Csaky, A4A

Richard Davis, Beveridge & Diamond

Summary of Meeting

During the meeting, permitting issues relating to multiple operators (i.e., airport authority and multiple
tenants) at an airport facility were discussed, including:

 Operator responsibilities for monitoring and repor ting, including NOI submittals

 Point of compliance for monitoring purposes

 Coordination on SWPPP development
exv10w39








Exhibit 10.39




March 5, 2009




Cummins Inc.

One American Square, Suite 1800

Indianapolis, Indiana 46282

Attention: Marya M. Rose, Vice President, General Counsel

                    and Corporate Secretary





			
	Re:	 	Extension of Standby Purchase Commitment




Dear Marya:




     This letter memorializes the agreement to modify the Standby Purchase Agreement between
Cummins Inc. (“Cummins”) and Irwin Financial Corporation (“IFC”) dated as of October 13, 2008 (the
“Agreement”) in order to extend its outside expiration date to April 30, 2009.



     By signing this letter in the space provided below, Cummins and IFC agree that the reference
to “December 31, 2008” in Section 12(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby changed to “April 30, 2009.”
Except for this date change, the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.



     Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth our agreement by signing this letter in
the space provided below.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,



IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  William I. Miller
 	 
	 	 	William I. Miller, Chairman and CEO 	 


Agreed as of the date first written above:



CUMMINS INC.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 

Its:

	 	/s/ Theodore M. Solso
 

Chairman and CEO
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Sean Zeigler,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:18cv580

Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Respondent.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed 

by the Magistrate Judge on August 16, 2022 (Doc. 29). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file 

objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th 

Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 29) have been filed, 

and the time to do so has passed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 29) of the Magistrate Judge is 

hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the 

Petition as amended is dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not 

disagree with this conclusion, the Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability, and 

this Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and 

Case: 1:18-cv-00580-MRB-MRM Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/09/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1924
2

should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge

United States District Court

Case: 1:18-cv-00580-MRB-MRM Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/09/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1925
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6619-6620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3577-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]


Illinois; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Illinois (FEMA-3577-EM), dated December 13, 2021, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued December 23, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Illinois is hereby amended to include the following area 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of 
December 13, 2021.

    Menard County for emergency protective measures (Category B), 
including direct

[[Page 6620]]

federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02239 Filed 2-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, 

INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA 

MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

This document relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS.

 Case No. 2:18-md-2846

 JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 51-A

Mediation Scheduling Order 

The Court hereby sets the following plan and schedule for mediation as follows: 

I. Schedule 

a. In-Person Mediation: The Attendees listed in section II below shall attend an 

in-person mediation session at 1 P.M. on Monday, March 25, 2024, and Tuesday, 

March 26, 2024. Additional meetings will occur at the discretion of the Mediator.

b. Deadline to Notify the Court: Absent satisfactory resolution of this matter by the 

parties, or absent agreement of the parties to extend the deadline to allow for 

continuing discussions, the parties and Mediator shall notify the Court of an 

impasse by 5:00 P.M. on May 24, 2024.

c. Submissions to the Court: If the parties have reached an impasse in their 

mediation efforts, then the parties shall confer on a joint proposal outlining a plan 

for moving this litigation forward, which will include suggestions for remand. 

After conferral, the parties shall submit a joint proposal or each shall submit its own 

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 835 Filed: 02/29/24 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 9371
2

proposal by June 24, 2024. At its discretion, the Court may set a schedule for 

briefing and/or argument on the proposal(s).

II. Mediation Attendees

The Attendees listed below are required to attend the in-person mediation session 

referenced in paragraph 1.a. Attendance at the in-person mediation is limited to the 

Attendees identified below, as well as the Court or Court personnel at the direction of 

the Court. 

a. Court-Appointed Mediator: Pursuant to CMO No. 34 (ECF No. 653), the 

Court-Appointed Mediator is John Jackson.

b. Plaintiffs’ Negotiation Committee: Pursuant to CMO 3-A (ECF No. 189), 

Timothy M. O’Brien, Kelsey L. Stokes, and Michael A. London previously have 

served and remain as the members of the Plaintiffs’ Negotiation Committee. 

c. Defendants’ Representatives: In addition to counsel selected by Defendants, the 

Court orders the attendance of at least one person employed by one of Defendants 

or their parent corporations who has the authority to negotiate on behalf of

Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

2/29/2024 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 835 Filed: 02/29/24 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 9372