alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 3, 2015

Mr. Tim Ryan TRYAN Incorporated

PO Box 283 Lawrence, MA 01842

Dear Mr. Ryan:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 8, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1530), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

PAULA ZELESNIK, Case No. 1:18-cv-584
Plaintiff, Black, J.
Litkovitz, M.J.
vs.
MICHAEL SCOTT, et al., REPORT AND
Defendants. RECOMMENDATION

On August 17, 2018, the Court ordered plaintiff to pay the required filing fee of $400.00 or
submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff
was notified that her complaint shall not be deemed “filed” until the appropriate filing fee of
$400.00 is paid or she is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Truitt v. County of
Wayne, 148 F.3d 644, 648 (6th Cir. 1998). Plaintiff was also advised that if she fails to pay the
filing fee or submit her application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days this matter
will be closed on the docket of the Court.

To date, more than thirty days later, plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order.
Accordingly, this matter should be closed and terminated on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

Date: ala lla Dhen Ahan

Karen L. Litkovitz, Magistrate Judge
United States District Court



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
PAULA ZELESNIK, Case No. 1:18-cv-584
Plaintiff, Black, J.
Litkovitz, M.J.

Vs.

MICHAEL SCOTT, et al.,
Defendants.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES REGARDING THE FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO R&R
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of the

recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the
proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on
timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected
to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report
and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral
hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such
portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the
assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections
WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in
accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140

(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

KEITH BELL, Ph.D.,

Plaintiff,

 Civil Action 2:18-cv-961 

v. Judge Edmund A. Sargus

 Magistrate Judge Jolson 

CAUGHT MY EYE PHOTOGRAPHY 

OF COLUMBUS, et al., 

Defendants. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Extension of Discovery and 

Dispositive Motion Deadlines. (Doc. 40). The parties explain that they have conducted written 

discovery and are in the process of trying to reschedule Plaintiff’s deposition. (Id. at 1). However, 

Plaintiff’s attorney, Joshua Jones, is planning to request leave to withdraw as counsel, and Plaintiff 

needs time to find new counsel. (Id.). Furthermore, the parties represent that they would like “to 

try to conduct settlement negotiations.” (Id.). For good cause shown, the Joint Motion 

is GRANTED. Accordingly, the discovery deadline is moved to January 21, 2020, and 

the dispositive motion deadline is moved to February 11, 2020. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: November 13, 2019 /s/ Kimberly A. Jolson

KIMBERLY A. JOLSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case: 2:18-cv-00961-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 41 Filed: 11/13/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 144
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ascential Software Corporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Ascential Software Corporation, (Nos. 333-98925, 333-87396,
333-01409, 33-11161, 33-22862, 333-31116, 33-31117, 333-31369, 33-31371,
33-50608, 33-50610, 33-56707, 333-61843, 333-70323, 333-89231, 333-31670, and
333-43238) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-90667) on Form S-3 of Ascential Software
Corporation of our report dated January 29, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Ascential Software Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form
10-K of Ascential Software Corporation.

Our report refers to the Company's adoption of Financial Accounting Standards
Board Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", effective
January 1, 2002.

                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 2003
**BRS Comparison Calculator Question and Answer (Q&A)**

**Q1. What does the DoD BRS Comparison Calculator provide service members?**

A1. The BRS Comparison Calculator will allow service members to compare estimated benefits under both retirement plans prior to making a decision.  The comparison calculator walks service members through key information needed to make an effective comparison.  Users can adjust 12 data fields to see how changes to their career and savings over time will impact retirement benefits.  

**Q2. There appears to be numerous calculators for comparing the two retirement systems-which calculator does DoD recommend I use?**

A2. The official DoD BRS Comparison Calculator is the only calculator endorsed by the DoD for supporting a service member's Blended Retirement System opt-in decision. However, service members can use any calculator they feel aids them in the decision making process.  It is important to note, while other organizations have developed and fielded similar calculators, only the DoD BRS Comparison Calculator has been validated by the DoD. 

**Q3. Why aren’t service member’s Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) contributions displayed under the legacy retirement system in the BRS Comparison Calculator?**

A3. The BRS Comparison Calculator was designed to provide a comparison between the legacy high-3 retirement system and the Blended Retirement System. While a service member has the ability to contribute to the TSP currently, it is not by law, part of a service member’s retirement. However, under the BRS, the TSP is an integral part of the retirement plan and service member’s contributions are required in order to receive government matching funds.

**Q4. In the BRS Comparison Calculator, why is the default TSP rate of return set to 7%?**

A4. The default TSP rate of comparison in the BRS Comparison Calculator is set to 7% and is based off the rate TSP “C” Fund rate. The 10-year average of the TSP "C" Fund as of December 2016 is 7.36%.  Likewise, the "C" Fund is designed to mirror the portfolio, risk, and return of the S&P 500.  That is the standard by which most investment funds are compared. Of course, service members have access to the historical TSP returns in the BRS Comparison Calculator and can change their default rate to meet their risk tolerance and predicted future rate of return.  

**Resources:**

http://militarypay.defense.gov/blendedretirement

http://militarypay.defense.gov/calculators/brs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON)

CHARLES A. WALDREN CASE NO. 3:18-cv-00290-WHR

Plaintiff, Removed from Common Pleas Court
of Montgomery County, Ohio
-Vs- Case No. 2017 CV 04415

ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

Judge Walter H. Rice

AGREED ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
OF ALL REMAINING CLAIMS

Defendants.

Now come the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby jointly agree
that all remaining claims in the above captioned litigation shall be and are hereby dismissed with
prejudice as all matters and controversies between the remaining parties have been resolved and
settled. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the
parties, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Ary 0b
Judge Walter H. Rice

co

/s/Jennifer K. Nordstrom
Jennifer K. Nordstrom (0066509)
Garvey Shearer Nordstrom, PSC
11260 Chester Road, Suite 320
Cincinnati, OH 45246

P: 513-445-3373

F: 866-675-3676

E: jnordstrom@gsn-law.com
Attorney for Plaintiff

Charles A. Waldren

4s/ Miranda Powell

J. Patrick Schomaker, Esq. (0076488)
Carmen Sarge, Esq. (0071913)
Miranda Powell, Esq. (0080100)
Rolfes Henry Co., L.P.A.

600 Vine Street, Suite 2600
Cincinnati, OH 45202

P: 513-579-0080
F: 513-579-0222
E: pschomaker@rolfeshenry.com

csarge@rolfeshenry.com
mpowell@rolfeshenry.com

Attorneys for Defendant Allstate Vehicle
and Property Insurance Company
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1855

MELVIN MCCOY JERMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. AT&T CORPORATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv - 00384

- MOC

- DSC )

Submitted : February 16, 2023 Decided: February 21, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circ uit Judge , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Melvin McCoy Jerman , Appellant Pro Se. David A. Grassi, Jr. , ECHOLS FIRM, LLC , Rock Hill, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1855 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Melvin McCoy Jerman appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to AT&T Corporation (“AT&T”) in Jerman’s civil action . We have reviewed
the record and find no r eversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Jerman v. AT&T , No. 3:20

- cv - 00384

- MOC

- DSC (W.D.N.C. July 20, 2022). We deny AT&T’s motion to strike Jerman’s pro se supplemental brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1855 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Case: 1:18-mj-00244-SKB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:18-mj-00244-SKB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 2
Exhibit 10.13





Exhibit 10.13





November 3, 2008



CONFIDENTIAL




Mr. Raymond C. Kubacki, Jr.

c/o Psychemedics Corporation

125 Nagog Park

Suite 200

Acton, MA 01720




Dear Ray:



This letter sets forth an amendment to the letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) between
you and Psychemedics Corporation (the “Company”) dated July 10, 2008. The Letter Agreement is
hereby amended by adding after paragraph 13 thereof the following paragraph 14:




	 	14.	 	Section 409A.






(a) Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, if at the time of your
separation from service within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder (the “Code”), following a Change in Control
as defined in paragraph 13(b) above, you are a “specified employee” within the meaning of
Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, then to the extent any payment or benefit that you
become entitled to under this Agreement would be considered deferred compensation subject to
the twenty percent (20%) additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A(a) of the Code as a
result of the application of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, such payment shall not be
payable and such benefit shall not be provided until the date that is the earlier of (i) six
(6) months and one (1) day after your separation from service, or (ii) your death.


 


 









 





Mr. Raymond C. Kubacki, Jr.

November 3, 2008

Page 2





(b) This Agreement is intended to be in compliance with the provisions of Section 409A
of the Code. To the extent that any provision of this Agreement is
ambiguous as to its compliance with Section 409A of the Code, the provision shall be
read in such a manner so that all payments hereunder comply with said Section. The parties
agree that this Agreement may be amended, as reasonably requested by either party, and as
may be necessary to fully comply with Section 409A of the Code and all related rules and
regulations in order to preserve the payments and benefits provided hereunder without
additional cost to either party.




(c) Solely for the purposes of Section 409A of the Code, each installment payment of
Termination Pay shall be considered a separate payment.




(d) The Company makes no representation or warranty and shall have no liability to you
or any other person if any provisions of this Agreement are determined to constitute
deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code but do not satisfy an exemption
from, or the conditions of, said Section.



If this letter correctly sets forth our understanding and agreement concerning the proposed
amendment, please indicate your acceptance by signing both copies of this letter and returning one
copy. The Letter Agreement shall then be amended as set forth above but shall otherwise remain in
full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,




PSYCHEMEDICS CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	                                                    /s/ William R. Thistle
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



Agreed to: November 3, 2008





/s/ Raymond C. Kubacki, Jr. 
Raymond C. Kubacki, Jr.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1009 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1009

 To require all Federal agencies to translate COVID-19 materials into 
              multiple languages, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2021

Ms. Meng (for herself, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Green of Texas, Ms. 
Schakowsky, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Espaillat, Ms. Blunt Rochester, 
  Ms. Barragan, Mr. Case, Mr. Lieu, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. 
Gomez, Ms. Porter, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Kilmer, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. 
Pressley, Ms. Castor of Florida, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Horsford, Ms. Eshoo, 
 Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. McNerney, 
 Ms. Strickland, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Sires, Mr. Garcia of 
  Illinois, Mr. Carson, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Newman, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. 
 Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Torres of New York, Ms. Johnson 
of Texas, Mr. Higgins of New York, Mr. Evans, and Mr. Meeks) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                               and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require all Federal agencies to translate COVID-19 materials into 
              multiple languages, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``COVID-19 Language Access Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSLATION OF MATERIALS.

    (a) In General.--Each Federal agency that receives Federal 
assistance related to the COVID-19 pandemic shall translate any English 
language written material prepared for the general public relating to 
such pandemic, including COVID-19 vaccine distribution and education, 
into the languages described in subsection (b) not later than 7 days 
after any such material is made available in English.
    (b) Languages Covered.--The material described in subsection (a) 
shall be translated, at a minimum, into Spanish, Arabic, Cambodian, 
Chinese, Haitian Creole, French, Hindi, Hmong, Italian, Japanese, 
Korean, Laotian, Russian, Tagalog, Urdu, Vietnamese, Greek, Polish, 
Thai, and Portuguese.
    (c) Definition of COVID-19 Pandemic.--In this section, the term 
``COVID-19 pandemic'' means the public health emergency declared by the 
Secretary pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act on 
January 31, 2020, entitled ``Determination that a Public Health 
Emergency Exists Nationwide as the Result of the 2019 Novel 
Coronavirus''.
                                 <all>
```
S.J., as parent of A.C. and A.W., minor children, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Respondents.

No. 1D17-4913

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 2018

S.J., pro se, Petitioner.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Jacksonville, for Respondent Department of Children and Families; Kelly A. Swartz, Appellate Counsel, Sanford, for Respondent Guardian ad Litem Program.

Per Curiam.

DENIED.

Wetherell, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Motivating the Masses, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2015, I, Lisa Nichols, Chief Executive
Officer of Motivating the Masses, Inc. and Alex Henderson, Chief Financial Officer of Motivating the Masses, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:



1.          Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.          The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2015, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Motivating the Masses, Inc.



|August 19, 2015 | By:                                                                   | /s/ Lisa Nichols   | 
|--------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | 
|                | Lisa Nichols, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  
|                |                                                                       |                   
|August 19, 2015 | By:                                                                   | /s/ Alex Henderson | 
|                | Alex Henderson, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
TENNESSEE CHAMBER

December 22,2014



### Mr. Scott Faulk Essential Air Service Division Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590
DearMr. Faulk: 197 Auditorium Street P.O. Box 1904 Jackson, Tennessee 38302-1904

r·.. ,.;,: 731.423.2200 p 731.424.4860 F chamber@jacksontn.com jacksontn.com

The Executive Committee ofthe Board ofDirectors ofthe Jackson Chamber voted unanimously onDecember 16, 2014, to support Jackson-Madison County Airport Authority 

### in their choice ofthe proposal submitted by Air Choice One to provide Essential Air Service to Jackson, TN. We held meetings over the pastmonth with business leaders and plantmanagers to determine which ofthe two proposals would bestfit our community. Since our community is not utilizing the air service to Nashville and Memphis at an acceptable level, no one was in favor ofcontinuing the Jackson/Nashville/Memphis service. Thankyou for all you do through the Essential Air Service Program to help our community. Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either myselfor Shirley Jones (sajones@iacksontn.com).