alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

I, C. Steven Guenthner, Chief Financial Officer of Almost Family, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | condition and results of operations of the Company |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: March 6, 2009 | By   /s/ C. Steven Guenthner                               |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | C. Steven Guenthner

Senior Vice President & Chief Financial

Officer |

 

 

A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
AUTOMATIC DRIVING SCHOOL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1401

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 13, 2017

ORDERED that the joint stipulation for voluntary dismissal of appeal is recognized by the Court, and this administrative appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles is hereby dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  In connection with the Annual Report of ERHC Energy Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Peter Ntephe, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/   Peter NtephePeter Ntephe
Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer
December 15, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0346

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

KEVIN WESLEY SANBERG,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 15, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 2 2024

08/02/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0346
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

TERRY A. COLLINS 

Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:18-cv-592 

 Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

 v. Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

 

DRAKE E. BENNETT, et al., 

 Defendants. 

ORDER 

Plaintiff and Defendants Drake Bennett and William Hughes have filed a joint motion, 

unopposed by Defendant Jeremy Tuttle, for leave to depose Plaintiff and two alleged witnesses 

to the assault giving rise to the claims in this action. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff and one witness, 

Jacob D. Montgomery, are currently incarcerated at Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, and the 

other witness, Shawn L. Nooks, is currently incarcerated at Lebanon Correctional Institution. 

(Id.) 

The joint motion (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED. The parties may depose Plaintiff, Jacob 

D. Montgomery, and Shawn L. Nooks on such terms and conditions as the institutions shall 

impose. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: April 9, 2019 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-146V 

Filed: December 19, 2016 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

D.S., a minor, by and through his natural * 

guardian, TESSA SKRYPEK, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

v. * Rotavirus Vaccination; 

 * Intussusception; 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. 

Robert P. Coleman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On February 1, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”) on behalf of D.S. Petitioner alleges that D.S. suffered from an 

intussusception as a result of receiving a rotavirus vaccination on June 5, 2013. Petition 

at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special 

Masters. 

On December 16, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report and proffer on 

award of compensation in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to 

compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer on Award of 

Compensation at 1. Specifically, respondent “has concluded that D.S. suffered 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

intussusception within the Table definition.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that 

based on the medical records “petitioner has met the statutory requirements for 

entitlement to compensation.” Id. Respondent additionally indicates that “based on the 

current record, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the 

Act.” Id.

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
1500 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301- 1500

MAY 2& 2017

MANPOWER AND
RESERVE AFFAIRS

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR
MILITARY PERSONNEL AND QUALITY OF LIFE
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY FOR
MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE FOR
FORCE MANAGEMENT AND PERSONNEL
ASSISTANT COMMANDANT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES,
U.S. COAST GUARD
DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF COMMISSIONED PERSONNEL,
U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
DIRECTOR, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC
ADMINISTRATION CORPS OPERATIONS-NC
DIRECTOR, DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE

SUBJECT: Blended Retirement System Lump-sum Government Discount Rate for 2018

Members of the Uniformed Services enrolled in the Blended Retirement System (BRS)
may elect to receive a lump sum of a portion of their retired pay upon retirement. In accordance
with section 1415 of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), the amount of the lump sum is to be
determined using a discount rate. The formula for determining that discount rate is published in
Attachment 2 to the Deputy Secretary of Defense memo “Implementation of the Blended
Retirement System” dated January 27, 2017.

According to the published formula, the Government Discount Rate (GDR) for lump-sum
elections occurring in calendar year 2018 is 6.99%, as calculated by the DoD Office of the
Actuary. This rate is in effect for any retirement for which a member is eligible to begin
receiving retired pay during the period from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018.

In accordance with the Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum, the GDR is
promulgated on June | to go into effect on January 1 of the following year. The next update to
the GDR will be published in June 2018 to be applied to lump-sum elections occurring in

calendar year 2019.
DA

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Military Personnel Policy)
1 April 2, 2013

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with environmental organizations

Attendees :

EPA: Peter Tsirigotis, OAQPS/SPPD, by phone Robert Wayland, OAQPS/SPPD, by phone William Maxwell, OAQPS/SPPD, by phone

Environmental organizations: John Walke, NRDC Sanjay Narayan, Sierra Club Paul Billings, American Lung Association Unidentified representative from Clean Air Task Force (CATF)

Discussion :

A general discussion was held regarding the recons ideration of the final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS).
Francisco ESTRADA, Appellant, v. PASCO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, n/k/a/ Bayfront Health Dade City ; Denis Stewart, M.D.; and Jane Does 1 through 3, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-1612

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                   Exhibit 21.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant








<PAGE>   2


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                CYTRX CORPORATION
                                 1997 FORM 10-K
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     Percentage
Name of Subsidiary                     State of Incorporation                       of Ownership
------------------                     ----------------------                       ------------

<S>                                    <C>                                          <C>
Custom Adjuvants, Inc.                      Georgia                                     100%

Proceutics, Inc.                            Delaware                                    100%

Vetlife, Inc.                               Delaware                                    100%

Vaxcel, Inc.                                Delaware                                    87.5%
</TABLE>
L.S., the Mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and the Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,895,008
<SECURITIES>                                 5,326,647
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,917,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,272,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,113,976
<PP&E>                                       7,367,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,653,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,905,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,039,118
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,986
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,240,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,905,995
<SALES>                                     14,347,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,786,880
<CGS>                                        7,205,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,205,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,738,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             293,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,915,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,915,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (137,932)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,052,992)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.82)


</TABLE>
Minister Mintstre ofAgriculture and de l'Agnculture et de Agri-Food l'Agroalimentaire and Ministerforthe et ministrede la Canadian Wheal Board Commission canadienne du ble Ottawa, Canada K1Aoes Quote: 157505 

## JAN 

## 31 

## 2011

Ms. LisaJackson Administrator Environmental Protection Agency

riel Rios Building 1200 PennsylvaniaAvenue NW Washington, DC 20460 USA

Dear Ms. Jackson:
I am writing to you today in regard to the submission ofthe Government ofCanada's petition on the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard program aggregate compliance approach for renewable biomass.
As the Minister ofAgriculture and Agri-Food, Ihereby confl1l11 that the petition and all ofthe supporting data have been reviewed and verified by officials in my depaliment who have primary expertise in agricultural land-use patterns and practices, as well as the Agriculture Division ofStatistics Canada, the agency within the Government ofCanada that specializes in collection, analysis and dissemination ofdata and statistics relating to agricultural land-usc patterns and practices (Statistics Canada certificate is enclosed). Taken together, this data and information supports the finding that planted crops and crop residue from Canada meet the definition ofrenewable biomass, and will continue to do so in the future. To this end, the Agriculture Division ofStatistics Canada, in collaboration with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada officials, will review, verify and submit data to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on an annual basis to facilitate the EPA's annual evaluation ofCanada's agricultural land use vis-a-vis the 2007 baseline areaofland specified in ourpetition.
The approval ofCanada's petition in atimely manner is important to the competitiveness ofthe biodiesel industry and thejobs they support-including several plants in the U.S.-that rely on Canadian canola as a feedstock. While we appreciate that petitions must be subject to proper analysis and review, as well as 60 days ofpublic comment, we are concerned by indications that the EPA petition approval process could take six months or longer to complete. I therefore request that the EPA expedite the review ofCanada's petition in order to minimize furiher harm to our industries.

.../2 

# Canada\tls. Lisa Jackson Page 2

We look forward to continued collaboration and co-operation with you and your officials on this issue. [have also enclosed a copy ofour petition for your review and approval.
Sincerely,

# Ge~t:::fI

Enclosures

c.c.: The Honourable Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary ofAgriculture Ms. Margo Oge, Director, Office ofTransportation and Air Quality, Environmental

Protection Agency
Gonzalo VIGNOLI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2247

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.