alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Nathan Alan STAFFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3954

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Chance TRINKLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


               I, William B. Yarmuth, Chief Executive Officer of Almost Family,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)    The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual
                period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies
                with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.





Date:          November 14, 2005             By  /s/ William B. Yarmuth
               -----------------                 -------------------
                                                 William B. Yarmuth
                                                 Chairman of the Board,
                                                 President & Chief Executive
                                                    Officer







   A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
          Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
Rehan HANIF v. STATE

CR-15-0100

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         172,080
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,994,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,921,518
<INVENTORY>                                    459,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,543,285
<PP&E>                                         55,890,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                 23,959,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,492,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,366,514
<BONDS>                                        788,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          2,756,714
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,327,718
<SALES>                                        1,364,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,110,514
<CGS>                                          613,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  613,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,341,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               789,580
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,818,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,652,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,652,207)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### Luna v Saginaw County Agricultural Society,

No. 90638;

*Leave to Appeal Denied September 20, 1991:*

Court of Appeals No. 116013.
December 22, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PNS STORES, INC. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00319

- CV V.

RENE MUNGUIA , Appellee

_______ _________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Rene Munguia, signed January 31, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the j udgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the court ’ s opinion. If, however, Munguia files in this Court a remittitur of $3,583.57 within twenty days after the issuance of our opinion, we instead will modify the trial court’s judgment to reduce the award of past medical expenses to $18,916.43 and affirm the trial court’s judgment as

modified.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee Rene Munguia

.

We further ord er this decision certified below for observance.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 18 - 00070 - CR EDWARD SAENZ, APPELL ANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 2

Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017 - 489,644, Honorable Drue Farmer, Presiding



### July 27 , 2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Pending before the Court is the motion of appellant Edward Saenz to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his attorney have signed the motion. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a). No decision of the Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 1 No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. James T. Campbell Justice Do not publish.

1 Appellant previously filed a motion to abate this appeal . The motion is rendered moot.
Johnathan Michael HOANG v. STATE

CR-15-1134

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1036 

AN ACT 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 

1956 to authorize rewards under the Department of 

State’s rewards program relating to information regarding individuals or entities engaged in activities in contravention of United States or United Nations sanctions, 

and for other purposes. 

2 

•HR 1036 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bassam Barabandi Re5 wards for Justice Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO DEPARTMENT OF STATE REWARDS 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 Subsection (b) of section 36 of the State Department 

9 Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708) is amend10 ed— 

11 (1) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘or’’ after 

12 the semicolon at the end; 

13 (2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period at 

14 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(13) the identification or location of an indi18 vidual or entity that— 

19 ‘‘(A) knowingly, directly or indirectly, im20 ports, exports, or reexports to, into, or from 

21 any country any goods, services, or technology 

22 controlled for export by the United States be23 cause of the use of such goods, services, or 

24 technology in contravention of a United States 

25 or United Nations sanction; or 

3 

•HR 1036 EH

1 ‘‘(B) knowingly, directly or indirectly, pro2 vides training, advice, or other services or as3 sistance, or engages in significant financial 

4 transactions, relating to any such goods, serv5 ices, or technology in contravention of such 

6 sanction.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1036 

AN ACT 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities 

other purposes. States or United Nations sanctions, and for gaged in activities in contravention of United information regarding individuals or entities enpartment of State’s rewards program relating to Act of 1956 to authorize rewards under the DeVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:01 Jul 21, 2021 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6651 Sfmt 6651 Z:\XMLBILLS\H1036.EH NODE
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXPEDITE ISSUANCE OF MANDATE

Appellate case name: Lashun Davis v. The State of Texas 

Appellate case number: 01-18-00519-CR

Trial court case number: 1150018

Trial court: 177th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: December 10, 2019

Party filing motion: Lashun Daivs 

The unopposed motion to expedite issuance of the mandate is granted. We direct the 

Clerk of this Court to issue the mandate immediately. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c). 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly_____

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

Date: December 19, 2019
IV 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 8 

Honoring and memorializing the life and sacrifice of Officer Brian D. 

Sicknick. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. PHILLIPS (for himself, Mr. KEATING, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. 

KILMER, Mr. MALINOWSKI, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. HASTINGS, 

Mr. SWALWELL, Ms. DEAN, Ms. WILD, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. 

MOULTON, and Mrs. DEMINGS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring and memorializing the life and sacrifice of Officer 

Brian D. Sicknick. 

Whereas, on January 6, 2021, thousands of insurrectionists 

carried out a violent attack against the United States 

Capitol in a failed attempt to disrupt and harm lawmakers certifying the outcome of the 2020 Presidential 

election; 

Whereas these individuals actively assaulted United States 

Capitol Police officers and other uniformed law enforcement officers with metal pipes, discharged chemical irritant, and took up other weapons against officers; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 8 IH 

Whereas rioters breached police perimeters, scaled the walls 

of the Capitol, and broke through doors and windows to 

gain entry to the Capitol; 

Whereas while these events were unfolding across the Capitol 

complex, United States Capitol Police officers were simultaneously responding to multiple reports of pipe bombs 

and suspicious vehicles in the immediate area surrounding the United States Capitol; 

Whereas Officer Brian D. Sicknick, a twelve-year veteran of 

the Capitol Police, sustained multiple injuries as a result 

of violent encounters with insurrectionists; and 

Whereas Officer Brian D. Sicknick later succumbed to his injuries, dying in the line of duty defending the United 

States Capitol complex and protecting all who serve and 

work throughout: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That— 

3 (1) the United States holds sincere gratitude 

4 and a deep respect for United States Capitol Police 

5 Officer Brian D. Sicknick for his courage in the line 

6 of duty and for the sacrifice he made to protect 

7 Members, staff, and employees inside the United 

8 States Capitol; 

9 (2) the United States extends its condolences to 

10 Officer Brian D. Sicknick’s family and loved ones 

11 during this difficult time; 

12 (3) no later than January 31, 2022, the Speak13 er of the House of Representatives, the minority 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 8 IH 

1 leader of the House of Representatives, the majority 

2 leader of the Senate, and the minority leader of the 

3 Senate shall select an appropriate memorial that 

4 shall be located in the United States Capitol and 

5 that shall honor the life and sacrifice of Officer 

6 Brian D. Sicknick; and 

7 (4) the memorial shall state the purpose of the 

8 honor and the name of the officer on whom the 

9 honor is bestowed. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
PINELLAS COUNTY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas M. WALSH, Jr., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 01, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellees' motion to dismiss appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed as from a nonappealable nonfinal order.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Manuel SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, and Sedgwick CMS, Appellees.

No. 1D17-4590

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 2018

Toni L. Villaverde of Toni L. Villaverde, PLLC, Coral Gables, for Appellant.

Michael A. Hernandez of Jones, Hurley & Hand, P.A., Miami, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
Karen ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-943

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
From: "Cain, Randy D." <RCAIN2@alleghenyenergy.com> 

 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Cannon, William E." <WCANNON@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Lapcevic, Joseph P." 

<JLAPCEV@alleghenyenergy.com> 

 

 Date: 07/06/2010 11:45 AM 

 Subject: Steam Electric Power Generating ICR - R. Paul Smith Power Station (09615) - Extension 

Request 

July 6, 2010

Jezebele Alicea

USEPA

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Mail Code: 4303T
Washington, DC 20460

RE: Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent

Guidelines

 Allegheny Energy

 R. Paul Smith Station – Plant ID 09615

Dear Ms. Alicea:

Allegheny Energy’s R. Paul Smith Power Station received the EPA

Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent

Guidelines on Friday, June 18, 2010. We have reviewed the ICR

questionnaire (Version 2) and believe its breadth and depth of

information require more time to complete. In accord with the

instructions on the EPA cover letter, Allegheny Energy respectfully

requests an additional 30 days to provide responses.

There are three reasons for this time extension request.

First, R. Paul Smith Power Station just recently received a draft NPDES

permit from MD MDE that is going to public hearing in late July.

Preparation for this more immediate public hearing precludes Allegheny

Energy and station staff from spending time preparing responses to the

ELG ICR.

In addition, Allegheny Energy initiated a merger with FirstEnergy of

Akron, Ohio, on February 11, 2010. In order to support the merger and

thoroughly explore the resulting synergies of the combined company

numerous employees of Allegheny Energy were sent to Akron at the end of

May for approximately a three month period. This has decreased an

already lean staff to continue conducting business as usual in addition

to responding to such inquiries as this ICR. Compounding the problem is

potential attrition of Allegheny Energy Corporate Services staff in

anticipation of job loss associated with the combination of the two

companies. Already, one key engineer that would have extensively worked

on the ICR as left the company.

Finally, the unprecedented issuance of a number of new regulatory

proposals (e.g. CCRs, GHG MRR, GHG Tailoring Rule), along with other

ICRs (i.e. HAPs MACT and PCB) by EPA and state regulatory agencies has

also added to the difficulty to provide thorough and meaningful
responses by our limited staff. An additional 30 days would allow for

Allegheny Energy and power station staffs to not only gather the

necessary data required to support the ICR, but also would provide time

to review the submittal for completeness and consistency. This

additional 30 days in the response time will most likely lessen the need

for further inquiry by EPA’s contractor (ERG) for purpose of explanation

of the responses provided and possibly supplemental information request

to aide clarification.

Thank you for considering this request.

Sincerely,

Randy Cain

Randy Cain

Environmental Affairs Manager

Allegheny Energy

800 Cabin Hill Drive

Greensburg, PA 15601

phone: 724-838-6004

fax: 724-830-7711

e-mail: rcain2@alleghenyenergy.com
| (1) |   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) |   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  as of December 31, 2005 and for the periods then ended. |
|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  April 7, 2006 | /s/                  Robert C.                  Ogden                                                                                                                          Robert                  C. Ogden, Chief Financial Officer and    Principal                  Financial and Accounting Officer |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,646,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     93,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,792,060
<PP&E>                                         204,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                 101,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,959,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,123,774
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,832
<OTHER-SE>                                     835,823
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,959,547
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  502,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (483,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,911
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (485,065)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
2023 Comprehensive Summary Sheet 

RANK/NAME STATE MRD/MSD AGE Joint Qualification TAG PANEL SCORE 

ForInternal Use 

REQUESTED TOUR STATUS SPECIALTY BRANCH OFFICER? MOST QUALIFIED AFSC/ARMY BRANCH

PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY

MILITARY EDUCATION

For Internal Use

EAD M-DAY D-HAT
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 90 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 90

 Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should invoke the 
   authorities provided under the Defense Production Act of 1950 to 
 increase the production of baby formula and provide for the equitable 
    distribution of baby formula through Federally qualified health 
                                centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2022

Mr. Gottheimer (for himself, Ms. Titus, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Bacon, Ms. 
    Manning, Mr. Suozzi, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Pappas, Mr. 
 Phillips, Ms. Slotkin, Ms. Sherrill, Mr. Case, Mr. Costa, Mr. Vicente 
Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Ms. Houlahan, and Ms. Clarke of 
  New York) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should invoke the 
   authorities provided under the Defense Production Act of 1950 to 
 increase the production of baby formula and provide for the equitable 
    distribution of baby formula through Federally qualified health 
                                centers.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the President should invoke the 
authorities provided under the Defense Production Act of 1950 
(including the use of the prioritization of contracts, loans, loan 
guarantees, direct purchase authority, and the authority to procure and 
install equipment in private industrial facilities) to increase the 
production of baby formula and provide for the equitable distribution 
of baby formula through Federally qualified health centers.
                                 <all>
```