alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

ODYSSEY
MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K of Odyssey
Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2009, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/S/    MICHAEL J.
HOLMES
|Michael J. Holmes       
|Chief Financial Officer 

March 9,
2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.



57
#### *In re*Forfeiture of $19,250,

No. 90662.

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. MCR 7.302(F)(1). Court of Appeals No. 131386.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1066 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1066

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
  Assistance Act to provide flexibility with the cost share for fire 
             management assistance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2021

 Mr. Neguse (for himself, Mr. Curtis, Mr. O'Halleran, Mr. Stewart, Ms. 
Norton, Ms. Jackson Lee, and Mr. San Nicolas) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
  Assistance Act to provide flexibility with the cost share for fire 
             management assistance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wildfire Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE COST SHARE.

    Section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Federal Share.--The Federal share of assistance under this 
section shall be not less than 75 percent of the eligible cost, as set 
forth in the regulations, of such assistance.''.

SEC. 3. RULEMAKING.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
President, acting through the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency and in consultation with the heads of relevant 
Federal departments and agencies, including the Department of 
Agriculture and the Department of Interior, shall conduct and complete 
a rulemaking to develop guidelines and a rule that establishes 
thresholds for cases in which the Federal cost share for section 420 of 
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 5187) may be increased. Such thresholds shall use a fire-
specific metric to determine fire damage referred to in subsection (a) 
of such section, and recommend a Federal cost share adjustment for fire 
damage that meets the established thresholds. The Administrator shall 
follow all notice and comment requirements set forth in section 553 of 
title 5, United States Code, for such rulemaking.
                                 <all>
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

GLEB TSIPURSKY, PhD.

: CASE NO. 2:18-cv-753

Plaintiff

: JUDGE WATSON

v.

: MAGISTRATE JUDGE VASCURA

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, et al.

:

JOINT STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

NOW COME the parties, by and through counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and give notice of this stipulated dismissal with prejudice of all claims, 

each party to bear its own costs.

Respectfully Submitted:

s/ Gary A. Reeve

Gary A. Reeve (0064872)

Trial Attorney for Plaintiff

Law Offices of Gary A. Reeve

5354 Cemetery Road

Hilliard, Ohio 43026

(614) 808-1881

s/ Wendy K. Clary

Wendy K. Clary (0077775)

Trial Attorney for Defendants

Senior Assistant Attorney General

Employment Law Section

30 East Broad Street, 23rd Floor

Columbus, Ohio 43215-3167

(614) 644-7257

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true copy of this Joint Stipulated Dismissal was served upon 

Defendant’s counsel electronically through the ECF system this 5th day of November, 2019.

s/ Gary A. Reeve

Gary A. Reeve
Fabiana T. LAZCANO, Appellant, v. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-3632

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 104 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 104

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
 relating to ``Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and 
                    Exercising Shareholder Rights''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2022

    Mr. Finstad submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
 relating to ``Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and 
                    Exercising Shareholder Rights''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Prudence and 
Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder 
Rights'' (87 Fed. Reg. 73822 (December 1, 2022)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Your Retirement System

National Guard & Reserve

Building Retirement Savings with the Blended Retirement System

The Blended Retirement System (BRS) is a modernized retirement plan for all new entrants into the Uniformed Services on or after 

Jan. 1, 2018, and eligible service members who opted into BRS. Features of the BRS include a defined contribution, consisting 

of government automatic and matching contributions, to a service member’s Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), a defined benefit (also 

known as a pension or monthly retired pay for life), after at least 20 years of service, a mid-career bonus called continuation pay 

and a new lump sum option at retirement. 

Calculate your retired pay 

base by averaging the highest 36 

months of basic pay

Calculate your equivalent years of 

active service by dividing your

 accumulated retirement 

points by 360

Defined Contribution 

Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)

Defined Benefit 

Received after completing 20 qualifying years of 

service and attaining age 60* 

Continuation Pay

Received between 8, 

but not more than 12 

years of service 

Lump Sum Option

A choice of how to 

receive your defined 

benefit

You can find additional information on #BlendedRetirement at http://militarypay.defense.gov/BlendedRetirement 

Source: Fiscal Year 2016 National Defense Authorization Act, sections 631, 632, 633, 644, and 635

Key Aspects Under BRS Maximize Your TSP

2% Resource Websites x x

Years 

Served

Retired 

Pay Base

1

2

3 4

• TSP.gov

• DFAS.mil

• MilitaryOneSource.mil

• SEC.gov

• MilitaryPay.defense.gov/Calculators

• MilitaryPay.defense.gov/BlendedRetirement

*or earlier based on qualifying active service

All Service members are fully vested in the automatic 1% contribution –

 it’s yours to keep--after completing 2 years of service

The Power of Compounding 

Compounding is powerful because it allows you to make 

money, not just on the money you contribute to your TSP, 

but also on the money that it earns. Think of it as having a 

snowball effect—so the sooner you start saving, the more 

years you have to save, and the more effective compounding is in building retirement savings. 

(*calculation using the planning tools at TSP.gov, based on an 

annual growth rate of 7% with monthly contributions)

7%

7%

$1,000

$14,254

$42,294

$97,454 Acct Value

10 Years

20 Years

30 Years

$30,000 Contributions

7%

$67,454 Acct Growth

$1,000 per yr for 30 years*

New entrants on or after Jan. 1, 2018

Automatically enrolled at 3% of your basic pay in an age 

appropriate TSP Lifecycle Investment Fund.

Your Service automatically contributes the equivalent of 1% of 

your basic or drill pay to your TSP after 60 days of service. 

You’ll see matching contributions at the start of 3 years through 

the completion of 26 years of service.

You Contribute DoD Auto 

Contribution DoD Matches Total

0% 1% 0% 1%

1% 1% 1% 3%

2% 1% 2% 5%

3% 1% 3% 7%

4% 1% 3.5% 8.5%

5% 1% 4% 10%

UNIFORMED SERVICES BLENDED RETIREMENT SYSTEM

BRS
Brian WHATLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3800

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 23, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

David Rogers, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. Case No. 2:18–cv–901 

Collateral Investigations and Judge Michael H. Watson 

Recovery Group, Inc., et al, 

 Magistrate Judge Deavers 

 Defendants. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On June 22, 2020, Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a Report and 

Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 63, recommending that the Court enter default against 

Defendant Collateral Investigations and Recovery Group, Inc. (“Collateral”) for failure to 

respond to her May 18, 2020 or June 2, 2020 Show Cause Orders. ECF Nos. 61–62. 

The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ECF No. 63. The R&R advised the parties that the failure to object to 

the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the 

District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting 

the R&R. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were 

filed. 

Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. ECF No. 63. The Clerk is 

DIRECTED to enter default against Collateral. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Michael H. Watson__________________ 

 MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case: 2:18-cv-00901-MHW-EPD Doc #: 64 Filed: 07/15/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 230
Geoffrey STILLWELL & Lori T. Stillwell, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1567

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 23, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellants have filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. Appellee previously filed a motion for attorney's fees which prevents this court from closing this appeal until it has been decided. Appellee shall advise this court within ten days whether a ruling on the motion for attorney's fees is sought, failing which the motion will be denied and the appeal will be dismissed.
#### Vaught v. Green.

*Opinion on motion to advance.*

Practice in Supreme Court : *Motion to advance canse.*

To justify a motion to advance a cause upon the docket on the ground that the appeal is prosecuted for delay merely, the absence of error should be apparent upon a short and cursory examination of the record. Where the court cannot determine whether there is probable ground for the appeal without a minute investigation of the record requiring such time that it would operate to delay other causes having precedence on the docket, the motion will be denied.

COCKRILL, C. J.

To justify a motion to advance a cause upon the docket on the ground that the appeal is prosecuted for delay only, the absence of error should be apparent. upon a short and cursory investigation of the record. An illustration is found in the not infrequent case of an appeal from a judgment at law where no exception was saved at the trial and the jury has settled the facts on conflicting testimony. Other instances both at law and in equity might be given, but whatever *379they may be, it was never intended that the rule should have so wide a scope as to force the court into the minute investigation of any cause an appellee may procure to be certified as a delay case. All difficulties are easy when known, and so counsel who have become familiar with the details of a tedious case, seeing the right of the judgment clearly, sometimes expect the courts to reach their conclusion as by intuition. But judges can arrive at the result only as counsel have done — that is, by the expenditure of time and labor. But the statute which establishes the practice of hastening the determination of appeals prosecuted merely for delay, does not intend to require that of the court at the expense of parties whose causes have precedence upon the docket. A delay case must not delay litigants in other cases. If it were permitted to do so, the statute which was designed to prevent the law’s delay would aggravate rather than remedy the evil, because it would afford relief to one party at the expense of many others who are equally meritorious.

The appeal in this cause has been recently prosecuted. The appellee has caused it to be certified as a delay case and seeks to have it advanced for affirmance at an '.early day. He has filed a brief statement of the case as .a compliance with Rule II., from which it appears that it was a contested cause in equity which turned upon a question of fact alone. But in order to ascertain whether there is probable cause to justify the appeal, it will be necessary to examine the pleadings, and to digest and weigh the testimony *pro*and *con*in a somewhat voluminous transcript. For the reason given above we decline to investigate the controversy until the cause is reached in its turn on the docket.

Motion denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael A. Bohm, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within such entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006



/s/ Michael A. BohmMichael A. BohmExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06481**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06481\06481_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06481\06481_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06481\06481_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06481\06481_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06481\Cerification Statement Plant Id_06481.pdf Plant certification statement

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Stefania Villella LEE v. Michael Wade LEE

2160241

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
E.C., The Mother and R.S., The Father, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Nos. 4D18-11 4D18-202

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND THE
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND
1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (353)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,524
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,323
<PP&E>                                          13,779
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,848)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,707
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,516
<SALES>                                         11,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,441
<CGS>                                           10,955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (46)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (490)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (831)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>