alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 24****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     Each of the undersigned officers and directors of Applied Innovation Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), hereby appoints William H. Largent and Curtis A. Loveland as his trueand lawful attorneys-in-fact, or any of them, with power to act without the other, as his true andlawful attorney-in-fact, in his name and on his behalf, and in any and all capacities stated below,to sign and to cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company’s annualreport on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and any and all amendmentsthereto, hereby granting unto said attorneys, and to each of them, full power and authority to doand perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all such capacities, every actand thing whatsoever necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully as each of theundersigned could or might do in person, hereby granting to each such attorney full power ofsubstitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that either such attorney or his substitutemay do by virtue hereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney in counterparts ifnecessary, effective as of March 6, 2006.DIRECTORS/OFFICERS:   Signature Title   /s/ William H. Largent William H. Largent Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Julia A. Fratianne Julia A. Fratianne Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)/s/ Thomas W. Huseby Thomas W. Huseby Director/s/ Kenneth E. Jones Kenneth E. Jones Director/s/ Curtis A. Loveland Curtis A. Loveland Director/s/ Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr. Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr. Chairman of the Board/s/ Richard W. Oliver Richard W. Oliver Director/s/ Alexander B. Trevor Alexander B. Trevor Director
Case: 3:18-cv-00290-WHR-SLO Doc #: 73 Filed: 12/22/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 3195
Exhibit No. 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of United Retail Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended May 1, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and amended on the date hereof
(the Report), we, Raphael Benaroya, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and George R. Remeta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that
based on our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                                                                 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ RAPHAEL BENAROYARaphael BenaroyaChief Executive OfficerJune 29, 2004/s/ GEORGE R. REMETAGeorge R. RemetaChief Financial OfficerJune 29, 2004 | 
|                                                                                                                                                 |
Pre-SAMS Recommended Readings

Clausewitz, Carl von. 1976. On War; edited and translated by Michael Howard and 

Peter Paret. Princeton University Press.

Echevarria, Antulio J. 2014. Reconsidering the American Way of War. Washington, DC: 

Georgetown University Press, 2014.

Handel, Michael I. 2001. Masters of War: Classical Strategic Thought. Portland, Ore: 

Routledge; 3rd edition.

Kilcullen, David. 2010. Counterinsurgency. Oxford University Press.

Leonhard, Robert L. 1994. The Art of Maneuver. Novato, Calif: Presidio Press.

Millett, Allan R., Peter Maslowski, and William B. Feis. 2012. For The Common 

Defense: A Military History of the United States of America from 1607 to 2012. New 

York: Free Press.

Orend, Brian. 2013. The Morality of War. Peterborough, Can: Broadview Press; 2nd 

edition.

Roam, Dan. 2013. The Back of the Napkin: Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with 

Pictures. London: Portfolio; Expanded edition.

Paret, Peter, Gordon A. Craig, and Felix Gilbert. 1986. Makers of Modern Strategy: 

From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age. Princeton University Press.

Schelling, Thomas C. 2008. Arms and Influence. New Haven, Conn: Yale University 

Press; Revised edition.

Sharre, Paul. 2018. Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New 

York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Slim, William J. 1956. Defeat Into Victory: Battling Japan in Burma and India, 1942-

1945. New York: Cooper Square Press; 1st edition

Sun-tzu, and Samuel B. Griffith. 1964. The Art of War. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
<PAGE>   1
March 24, 1998


ShoLodge, Inc.
130 Maple Drive North
Hendersonville, Tennessee 37075

Dear Sirs:

At your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q/A to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended
April 20, 1997, of the facts relating to the write-off of pre-opening costs. We
believe, on the basis of the facts so set forth and other information furnished
to us by appropriate officials of the Company, that the accounting change
described in your Form 10-Q/A is to an alternative accounting principle that is
preferable under the circumstances.

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of ShoLodge, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to
December 29, 1996. Therefore, we are unable to express, and we do not express,
an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q/A, on the
related information furnished to us by officials of the Company, or on the
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of ShoLodge, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to
December 29, 1996.

Yours truly,

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Nashville, Tennessee
T HE U NITED B UILDING

, 77 W EST W ACKER D RIVE

, C HICAGO

, IL 60601

D AN W EISS

M ANAGING D IRECTOR

, I NTERNATIONAL A FFAIRS & R EGULATORY ( 3 12 ) 997

-

7573

DAN

. WEISS @ COAIR

. COM

February 29, 2012

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

D epartment of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Applications of Continental and EVA

Undocketed and Docket DOT

- OST

- 2002

- 11460

Dear Mr. Gretch:

By Notices of Action Taken on November 13, 1998 and March 21, 2 002, the

Department granted Statements of Authorization and exemptions authorizing

code

- share services by Continental and EVA. Consistent with Department

requirements, Continental notifies the Department that Continental and EVA

will cease all code

- share services effective March 1, 2012.

Sincerely,

Dan Weiss

Managing Director, International & Regulatory

Affairs

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

cc: Robert Finamore

Esta Rosenberg

Malcolm Benge

Keith GlatzT HE U NITED B UILDING

, 77 W EST W ACKER D RIVE

, C HICAGO

, IL 60601 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

agoerlich@ggh

- airlaw.com (Southern Air)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (UPS)

carl.nelson@aa.com

cdonley@ssd.com ( Alaska)

charters@evergre enaviation.com

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

howard.kass@usairways.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com (Hawaiian)

john.allen@faa.gov

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com (World Airways)

nssparks@fedex.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

slachter@lachter

- clements.com (ASTAR)

william.stallings@usdoj.gov

Annalei Avanceña

Int ernational Regulatory A dvisor

February 29, 2012
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                   STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------------                   ----------------------
Lechters Alabama, Inc.               Alabama

Lechters Arizona, Inc.               Arizona

Lechters Arkansas, Inc.              Arkansas

Lechters California, Inc.            California

Lechters Colorado, Inc.              Colorado

Lechters Connecticut, Inc.           Connecticut

Lechters Delaware, Inc.              Delaware

Lechters M Street, Inc.              District of Columbia

Lechters Florida, Inc.               Florida

Lechters Georgia, Inc.               Georgia

Lechters Idaho, Inc.                 Idaho

Lechters Illinois, Inc.              Illinois

Lechters Indiana, Inc.               Indiana

Lechters Iowa, Inc.                  Iowa

Lechters Kansas, Inc.                Kansas

Lechters Kentucky, Inc.              Kentucky

Lechters Louisiana, Inc.             Louisiana

Lechters Maine, Inc.                 Maine

Lechters Baltimore, Inc.             Baltimore

Lechters Holyoke, Inc.               Massachusetts
<PAGE>   2
Page 2

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                   STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------------                   ----------------------
Lechters Michigan, Inc.              Michigan

Lechters Minnesota, Inc.             Minnesota

Lechters Mississippi, Inc.           Mississippi

Lechters Missouri, Inc.              Missouri

Lechters Nebraska, Inc.              Nebraska

Lechters Nevada, Inc.                Nevada

Lechters New Hampshire, Inc.         New Hampshire

Lechters New Jersey, Inc.            New Jersey

Lechters New Mexico, Inc.            New Mexico

Lechters New York, Inc.              New York

Lechters N.Y.C., Inc.                New York

Lechters North Carolina, Inc.        North Carolina

Lechters Ohio, Inc.                  Ohio

Lechters Oklahoma, Inc.              Oklahoma

Lechters Oregon, Inc.                Oregon

Lechters Pennsylvania, Inc.          Pennsylvania

Lechters Rhode Island, Inc.          Rhode Island

Lechters South Carolina, Inc.        South Carolina

Lechters Tennessee, Inc.             Tennessee

Lechters Texas, Inc.                 Texas
<PAGE>   3
Page 3

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                   STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------------                   ----------------------

Lechters Utah, Inc.                  Utah

Lechters Vermont, Inc.               Vermont

Lechters Springfield, Inc.           Virginia

Lechters Washington, Inc.            Washington

Lechters West Virginia, Inc.         West Virginia

Lechters Wisconsin, Inc.             Wisconsin

Cooks Club, Inc.                     New Jersey

Regent Gallery, Inc.                 New Jersey

Simple Solutions of NJ, Inc.         New Jersey

Harrison Investment, Corp.           Delaware
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00508

- CV

Rudy MENDEZ

, Appellant

v.

City of San Antonio Building

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BUILDING STANDARDS B OARD

, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 08659

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. The district

clerk’s pending Notif ication of Late Record is, therefore, moot. Costs of appeal are assessed

against appellant.

SIGNED September 10, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Annual Report of National Lampoon, Inc and Subsidiaries
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is
an exhibit (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the periods reflected therein.

Date:  October 29, 2004                          /s/ James P. Jimirro
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                     James P. Jimirro,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                                 /s/ James Toll
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                     James Toll,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                        Consent of Independent Auditors
                        -------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-80341) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan of Pharmacopeia,
Inc., the 1995 Director Option Plan of Pharmacopeia, Inc. and the 1995 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of Pharmacopeia, Inc. and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-20883) pertaining to the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan of
Pharmacopeia, Inc. of our report dated January 27, 1998, except for Note 13 as
to which the date is February 4, 1998, with respect to the financial statements
of Pharmacopeia, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1997.



                                                   Ernst & Young LLP


Princeton, New Jersey
February 26, 1998
#### Fourth Street National Bank *v.*Richard *W.*Bacon, Appellant.

*Partnership*— Limited *partnership under act of March*21, *1836*— Lia*bility of special partner*— Misstatement *of capital.*

Argued Jan. 21, 1895.

Appeal No. 120, July T., 1894, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1894, No. 644, making absolute a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, *306Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Affirmed.

Assumpsit on a promissory note given by a limited partnership formed under the act of March 21, 1836, P. L. 143.

The facts are the same as in Fourth Street National Bank v. Whitaker, next preceding case.

*Error assigned*was order entering judgment.

*Gceorge Tuelcer Rispham,*for appellant,

cited: Haddock v. Mfg. Corporation, 9 Pa. 372; Seibert v. Blakewell, 87 Pa. 506; Fifth Ave. Bank v. Colgate, 120 N. Y. 381; Bokee v. Walker, 14 Pa. 139; Ropes v. Colgate, 17 Abb. N. C. 149.

*Samuel*Dickson, *Riokard O. Dale*with him, for appellee.

October 7, 1895:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

The facts in this case are precisely those in case of same plaintiff v. William Whitaker, opinion herewith filed. For the same reasons, the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 43 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 43

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2021

Mr. Green of Tennessee submitted the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The Supreme Court of the United States shall be 
composed of nine justices, though one or more of these nine offices may 
be vacant until filled.
    ``Section 2. If the size of the Supreme Court has been increased to 
more than nine justices before this amendment is ratified, upon the 
ratification of this amendment, those additional offices are void.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5

TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50758

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY RAY LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(MO-96-CR-139-1)

October 6, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny Ray Lewis appeals his jury trial convictions for conspiracy to

distribute cocaine base and for the distribution thereof. He claims: (1) insufficiency

of the evidence of conspiracy; (2) abuse of discretion in admitting Fed.R.Evid.

404(b) evidence of other acts; (3) error in determining drug quantity forsentencing

purposes; and (4) “sentencing entrapment.”

Our review of the record and briefs persuades that the conviction for
 

1 United States v. Laury, 49 F.3d 145 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Inocencio, 40

F.3d 716 (5th Cir. 1994).

 

2 United States v. Bentley-Smith, 2 F.3d 1368 (5th Cir. 1993).

 

3 United States v. Vine, 62 F.3d 107 (5th Cir. 1995).

 

4 United States v. Washington, 44 F.3d 1271 (5th Cir. 1995).

2

conspiracy to distribute cocaine base was not a manifest miscarriage of justice,1

there was no abuse of discretion in the admission of the Rule 404(b) evidence,2and

no clear error in the determination of the relevant quantity of drugs for sentencing

purposes.3 Finally, assuming without deciding that sentencing entrapment is a

viable proposition in this circuit, Lewis has not demonstrated that he was induced

by the government to deal in greater amounts of the contraband than that to which

he was disposed in order to increase his sentence exposure.4

The convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 23 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 23

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 extending the right to vote to citizens sixteen years of age or older.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2021

 Ms. Meng (for herself, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Bowman, Mr. 
Casten, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Jones, 
   Mr. Kahele, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Moulton, Ms. 
   Ocasio-Cortez, Ms. Pressley, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Tlaib, and Mrs. 
Trahan) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 extending the right to vote to citizens sixteen years of age or older.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The twenty-sixth article of amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.
    ``Section 2. The right of citizens of the United States, who are 
sixteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged 
by the United States or by any State on account of age.
    ``Section 3. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```