alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 

)

STEVE SNYDER-HILL, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 )

 

Case No. 2:18-cv-00736 

Judge Michael H. Watson 

Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. 

Deavers 

 ) 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Notice is hereby given that all Plaintiffs named in the document attached hereto as 

Attachment A hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit from this 

Court’s decision and order entered in this action on the 22nd day of September, 2021 (ECF No. 

158), which granted the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, as well as the accompanying final 

judgment entered on the same day (ECF No. 159). 

Dated: Columbus, OH Respectfully submitted, 

 October 21, 2021 

By: /s/ Scott E. Smith 

 Scott E. Smith 

Address: SCOTT ELLIOTT SMITH, LPA 

5003 Horizons Drive, Suite 100 

Columbus, Ohio 43220 

Phone: (614) 846-1700 

 Fax: (614) 486-4987 

E-Mail:ses@sestraillaw.com 

 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Case: 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD Doc #: 160 Filed: 10/21/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 2778
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2 Case No. 3:18-cr-095
Plaintiff, e Judge Walter H. Rice
Vv.
DELAQUON SPEARS,

Defendant.

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Upon the United States’ Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture and the Court’s review of the
record, the Court HEREBY FINDS THAT:

On January 8, 2019, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, finding that all
right, title, and interest in a Ruger LC9 .380, with an extended magazine (7 cartridges), serial
number obliterated (hereinafter the “subject property”) had been forfeited to the United States
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

The Court also found that the defendant had an interest in the subject property and directed
the United States to seize the subject property and to give notice of its intent to forfeit the property.

The United States gave electronic notice through the CM/ECF notification system of the
Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture to counsel for the defendant, and the defendant did not
object to the forfeiture.

On November 20, 2019, the Court held the defendant’s sentencing hearing and announced
the forfeiture of the subject property. The Judgment establishes that the defendant shall forfeit

the subject property to the United States.


The United States published notice of this forfeiture action and of its intent to dispose of
the subject property in accordance with the law on an official government internet site
(www. forfeiture.gov) for at least 30 consecutive days, beginning on January 10, 2019.

The United States did not send direct written notice of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture
because no person or entity reasonably appeared to be a potential claimant with standing to contest
the forfeiture of the subject property in the ancillary proceeding.

No person or entity has filed a timely petition with the Court asserting any interest in the
subject property or objecting to its proposed forfeiture.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. All right, title, and interest in the subject property is condemned and forfeited to the
United States under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) and no right, title, or interest
shall remain in any other person or entity.

2. The United States shall dispose of the subject property in accordance with the law.

3. The United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose
of enforcing this Final Order of Forfeiture.

SO ORDERED:
Dated: 3-tA+a9 Lhe uy )vew

WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 61

   Establishing deadlines for the Joint Committee of Congress on the 
Library to approve or deny the statue of the Reverend William Franklin 
  ``Billy'' Graham, Jr., for placement in the National Statuary Hall.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2021

 Mr. Budd (for himself, Mr. Murphy of North Carolina, Mr. Hudson, Mr. 
 Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. Rouzer, and Mr. Cawthorn) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Establishing deadlines for the Joint Committee of Congress on the 
Library to approve or deny the statue of the Reverend William Franklin 
  ``Billy'' Graham, Jr., for placement in the National Statuary Hall.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library shall approve or 
deny--
            (1) the full-sized clay model and pedestal design of a 
        statue of the Reverend William Franklin ``Billy'' Graham, Jr., 
        not later than 30 days after the State of North Carolina 
        submits photographs of the model from all four sides, the 
        dimensions of the statue and pedestal, engineering drawings of 
        the pedestal, the anticipated weight of the completed statue 
        and pedestal, and the text of any proposed inscriptions to the 
        Architect of the Capitol; and
            (2) the completed statue of the Reverend William Franklin 
        ``Billy'' Graham, Jr., not later than 30 days after the State 
        of North Carolina submits photographs of the completed statue 
        and pedestal from all four sides, the dimensions of the statue 
        and pedestal, the final weight of the statue and pedestal, and 
        the text of any inscriptions to the Architect of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.10


 


The Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
Compensation Committee oversees the bonuses for all executive officers.  Individual bonus awards are made pursuant to
an annual cash bonus plan that is recommended by the Compensation Committee and
was approved by the full board. 
Potential bonus awards are based on achievement of certain objective
criteria, including a minimum threshold of 4% earnings per share growth with
10% growth required to receive the maximum bonus amount related to earnings per
share and a minimum threshold on return on average equity is 9% with the top
tier of the goal at 12% and the return on average assets has minimum and
maximum threshold of 0.8% and 1.25% respectively.  Additionally, the Compensation Committee and
the board consider subjective performance measures in addition to objective
measures, which subjective component comprises up to forty percent of the
potential bonus award for each executive officer.
Case: 3:18-mj-00173-SLO Doc #: 5 Filed: 03/27/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 78
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

 

 : 

__________________________________ : Case No. _________________ 

 : Judge: ___________________ 

 v. : Corporate Disclosure Statement 

 : 

__________________________________ : 

 : 

 

Pursuant to the Corporate Disclosure Statement provisions in Local Civil Rule 7.1.1: Any nongovernmental corporate party to a proceeding must file a Corporate Affiliations/Financial Interest 

statement identifying all of its parent, subsidiary and other affiliate corporations and listing any publicly 

held company that “controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with a publicly controlled 

corporation.” A party must file the statement upon filing a complaint, answer, motion, response or other 

pleadings in this Court, whichever occurs first. The obligation to disclose any changes will be continuing 

throughout the pendency of this case. 

 In Compliance with those provisions, this Corporate Disclosure Statement is filed on behalf of: 

 _______________________________________________________________________. 

1. Is said party a parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of a publicly owned corporations? 

 ___ YES ___ NO 

If the answer is YES, list below the identity of the parent, subsidiary or other affiliate corporation 

and the relationship between it and the named party: 

________________________________________________________________________ 

________________________________________________________________________ 

2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the case, that has a financial interest in the 

outcome? 

 ___ YES ___ NO 

 If the answer is YES, list the identity of such corporation and the nature of the financial interest. 

 ________________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________________ 

 ________________________________________________________________________ 

 ______________________________ ________________________ 

 Signature of Counsel Date 

“Certificate of Service” 

COUNSEL ARE REMINDED OF THEIR CONTINUING OBLIGATION 

TO UPDATE AND SUPPLEMENT THIS STATEMENT

Jeffrey Blevins 18-cv-361EASKAJ Hon. J. Edmund A. Sargus Capital Alliance Group Capital Alliance Group ✔

N/A ✔

N/A /s/ William R. Restis 8/15/18 EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 2:18-cv-00364-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 13 Filed: 08/15/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 207
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1028 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1028

To direct the Secretary of Defense to revise and update the Department 
 of Defense regulations to allow trademarks owned or controlled by the 
    Department of Defense to be combined with religious insignia on 
commercial identification tags (commonly known as ``dog tags'') and to 
     be sold by lawful trademark licensees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2021

    Mr. Steube (for himself, Mr. Waltz, Mr. Gohmert, and Mr. Gaetz) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to revise and update the Department 
 of Defense regulations to allow trademarks owned or controlled by the 
    Department of Defense to be combined with religious insignia on 
commercial identification tags (commonly known as ``dog tags'') and to 
     be sold by lawful trademark licensees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Insignia on Dog Tags 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RELIGIOUS INSIGNIA ON COMMERCIAL IDENTIFICATION TAGS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review and update 
Department of Defense Directive 5535.12 and any associated regulations 
to allow trademarks owned or controlled by the Department of Defense to 
be combined with religious insignia on commercial identification tags 
(commonly known as ``dog tags'') and to be sold by lawful trademark 
licensees.
    (b) Retroactive Effective Date.--The update to the Directive under 
subsection (a) shall be deemed to have taken effect on September 13, 
2013.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6998

KENNETH SANDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEPUTY COURTS, in his official capacity and

individual capacity; DEPUTY BUTLER, in his

official and individual capacity; DEPUTY

BOWERS, in his official and individual

capacity; A. K. LITES, Lieutenant, Grievance

Coordinator, in his official capacity; DEPUTY

BARLEY; NURSE LAHAI; DOCTOR NWOSU,

Defendants - Appellees.

and

DEPUTY GREMIER, in her official and individual

capacity; ARLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER;

ARLINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, NURSE

GERALD,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CA-02-208-2)

Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 23, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Jack L. Gould, Fairfax,

Virginia, Edward Joseph McNelis, III, John David McChesney, Ashton

Marie Jennette, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Sanders appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Sanders v. Deputy Courts, No. CA-02-208-2 (E.D. Va. May 12, 2004).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11641]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Jurassic Oceans: Monsters of 
the Deep'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Jurassic Oceans: Monsters of the 
Deep'' at the Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of 
cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0172646275686e6f333534384172756075642f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93e0f6f0e7fafcfda1a7a6aad3e0e7f2e7f6bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-01861 Filed 1-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 
   
Simmons Bank,

    Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
August 7, 2019  By           /S/ NANCY WILLIS               Nancy Willis               Vice President**
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 99 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 99

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relating to parental rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2022

Mrs. Lesko submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relating to parental rights.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, 
education, and care of their children is a fundamental right.
    ``Section 2. The parental right to direct education includes the 
right to choose, as an alternative to public education, private, 
religious, or home schools, and the right to make reasonable choices 
within public schools for one's child.
    ``Section 3. Neither the United States nor any State shall infringe 
these rights without demonstrating that its governmental interest as 
applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.
    ``Section 4. The parental rights guaranteed by this article shall 
not be denied or abridged on account of disability.
    ``Section 5. This article shall not be construed to apply to a 
parental action or decision that would end life.''.
                                 <all>
```
Richard Lee MELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5267

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 6, 2018

Richard Lee Melton, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 27 

Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2021 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself and Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 

Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of David M. Rubenstein of Maryland on 

8 May 7, 2021, is filled by the appointment of Barbara M. 

9 Barrett of Arizona. The appointment is for a term of 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 27 IH 

1 1,912 days, beginning on May 8, 2021, or the date of the 

2 enactment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs later. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 250 Filed: 10/24/19 Page: 1 of 5  PAGEID #: 2988

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 250 Filed: 10/24/19 Page: 2 of 5  PAGEID #: 2989

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 250 Filed: 10/24/19 Page: 3 of 5  PAGEID #: 2990

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 250 Filed: 10/24/19 Page: 4 of 5  PAGEID #: 2991

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 250 Filed: 10/24/19 Page: 5 of 5  PAGEID #: 2992
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                       5,173,617
<SECURITIES>                 000
<RECEIVABLES>                65,764
<ALLOWANCES>                 000
<INVENTORY>                  000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             000
<PP&E>                       59,532,125
<DEPRECIATION>               000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               64,935,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        20,465,765
<BONDS>                      000
<COMMON>                     000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        000
<PREFERRED>                  000
<OTHER-SE>                   44,469,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 64,935,053
<SALES>                      5,074,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             5,719,474
<CGS>                        000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                2,502,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             2,745,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>             3,310,365
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           1,483,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>              000
<INCOME-TAX>                 000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          (4,322,230)
<DISCONTINUED>               000
<EXTRAORDINARY>              000
<CHANGES>                    000
<NET-INCOME>                 (4,322,230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                (0.55)


</TABLE>