Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules 58435 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2016–0169; FRL–9951–28– 

Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; Indiana; RACM 

Determination for Indiana Portion of 

the Cincinnati-Hamilton 1997 Annual 

PM2.5 Nonattainment Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

the reasonably available control 

measures (RACM) and reasonably 

available control technology (RACT) 

analysis that Indiana submitted as part 

of their earlier attainment plan for the 

1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 

standard, in accordance with Indiana’s 

request dated February 11, 2016. The 

RACM/RACT analysis addresses RACM 

and RACT for the Indiana portion of the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton nonattainment area 

for the 1997 PM2.5 standard. EPA is not 

proposing to act on the portions of the 

state implementation plan (SIP) revision 

that are unrelated to RACM/RACT. 

Other portions of the attainment plan 

have either been addressed or will be 

addressed in future rulemaking actions. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 26, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2016–0169 at http://

www.regulations.gov or via email to 

aburano.douglas@epa.gov. For 

comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 

follow the online instructions for 

submitting comments. Once submitted, 

comments cannot be edited or removed 

from Regulations.gov. For either manner 

of submission, EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e. 

on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, please contact the person 

identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 

full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph Ko, Environmental Engineer, 

Attainment, Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–7947, 

ko.joseph@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Rules and Regulations section of this 

Federal Register, EPA is approving the 

state’s SIP submittal as a direct final 

rule without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the Rules and Regulations section of 

this Federal Register. 

Dated: August 9, 2016. 

Robert Kaplan, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2016–20311 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0368; FRL–9951–26– 

Region 3] 

Determination of Attainment by the 

Attainment Date for the 2008 Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards; Pennsylvania; PittsburghBeaver Valley 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to determine 

that the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, 

Pennsylvania marginal ozone 

nonattainment area (the Pittsburgh 

Area) has attained the 2008 ozone 

national ambient air quality standards 

(NAAQS) by the July 20, 2016 

attainment date. This proposed 

determination is based on complete, 

certified, and quality assured ambient 

air quality monitoring data for the 

Pittsburgh Area for the 2013–2015 

monitoring period. This proposed 

determination does not constitute a 

redesignation to attainment. This action 

is being taken under the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before September 26, 

2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03– 

OAR–2016–0368 at http://

www.regulations.gov, or via email to 

fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. For 

comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 

follow the online instructions for 

submitting comments. Once submitted, 

comments cannot be edited or removed 

from Regulations.gov. For either manner 

of submission, EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

confidential business information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e. 

on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, please contact the person 

identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 

full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maria A. Pino, (215) 814–2181, or by 

email at pino.maria@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
58436 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

I. Background 

A. Statutory Requirement— 

Determination of Attainment by the 

Attainment Date 

Section 181(b)(2) of the CAA requires 

EPA to determine, within 6 months of 

an ozone nonattainment area’s 

attainment date, whether that area 

attained the ozone standard by that date. 

Section 181(b)(2) of the CAA also 

requires that areas that have not attained 

the standard by their attainment 

deadlines be reclassified to either the 

next higher classification (e.g., marginal 

to moderate, moderate to serious, etc.) 

or to the classifications applicable to the 

areas’ design values in Table 1 of 40 

CFR 51.1103. CAA section 181(a)(5) 

provides a mechanism by which the 

EPA Administrator may grant a 1-year 

extension of an area’s attainment 

deadline, provided that the relevant 

states meet certain criteria. 

B. The Pittsburgh Area and Its 

Attainment Date 

On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a 

revised ozone NAAQS of 0.08 parts per 

million (ppm), averaged over eight 

hours. 62 FR 38855. This standard was 

determined to be more protective of 

public health than the previous 1979 1- 

hour ozone standard. In 2008, EPA 

revised the 8-hour ozone NAAQS from 

0.08 to 0.075 ppm (the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS). See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 

2008). In a May 21, 2012 final rule, the 

Pittsburgh Area was designated as 

marginal nonattainment for the more 

stringent 2008 ozone NAAQS, effective 

on July 20, 2012. 77 FR 30088. The 

Pittsburgh Area consists of Allegheny, 

Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, 

Washington, and Westmoreland 

Counties in Pennsylvania. See 40 CFR 

81.339. 

In a separate rulemaking action, also 

published on May 21, 2012 and effective 

on July 20, 2012, EPA established the air 

quality thresholds that define the 

classifications assigned to all 

nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS (the Classifications Rule). 77 FR 

30160. This rule also established 

December 31 of each relevant calendar 

year as the attainment date for all 

nonattainment area classification 

categories. Section 181 of the CAA 

provides that the attainment deadline 

for ozone nonattainment areas is ‘‘as 

expeditiously as practicable’’ but no 

later than the prescribed dates that are 

provided in Table 1 of that section. In 

the Classifications Rule, EPA translated 

the deadlines in Table 1 of CAA section 

181 for purposes of the 2008 standard 

by measuring those deadlines from the 

effective date of the new designations, 

but extended those deadlines by several 

months to December 31 of the 

corresponding calendar year. Pursuant 

to a challenge of EPA’s interpretation of 

the attainment deadlines, on December 

23, 2014, the United States Court of 

Appeals for the District of Columbia 

Circuit (D.C. Circuit) issued a decision 

rejecting, among other things, the 

Classifications Rule’s attainment 

deadlines for the 2008 ozone 

nonattainment areas, finding that EPA 

did not have statutory authority under 

the CAA to extend those deadlines to 

the end of the calendar year. NRDC v. 

EPA, 777 F.3d 456, 464–69 (D.C. Cir. 

2014). Accordingly, as part of the final 

SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 

ozone NAAQS (80 FR 12264, March 6, 

2015), EPA modified the maximum 

attainment dates for all nonattainment 

areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, 

consistent with the D.C. Circuit’s 

decision. The State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) Requirements Rule 

established a maximum deadline for 

marginal nonattainment areas of three 

years from the effective date of 

designation, or July 20, 2015, to attain 

the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 80 FR at 

12268; 40 CFR 51.1103. 

In a final rulemaking action published 

on May 4, 2016, EPA determined that 

the Pittsburgh Area did not attain the 

2008 ozone NAAQS by its July 20, 2015 

attainment date, based on ambient air 

quality monitoring data for the 2012– 

2014 monitoring period. In that same 

action, EPA determined that the 

Pittsburgh Area qualified for a 1-year 

extension of its attainment date, as 

provided in section 181(a)(5) of the CAA 

and interpreted by regulation at 40 CFR 

51.1107. The new attainment date for 

the Pittsburgh Area is July 20, 2016. See 

81 FR 26697 (May 4, 2016). 

II. EPA’s Analysis of the Relevant Air 

Quality Data 

Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 

50, appendix P, the 2008 ozone NAAQS 

is attained at a monitoring site when the 

three-year average of the annual fourth 

highest daily maximum 8-hour average 

ambient air quality ozone concentration 

is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. This 

three-year average is referred to as the 

design value. When the design value is 

less than or equal to 0.075 ppm at each 

ambient air quality monitoring site 

within the area, then the area is deemed 

to be meeting the NAAQS. The 

rounding convention under 40 CFR part 

50, appendix P dictates that 

concentrations shall be reported in ppm 

to the third decimal place, with 

additional digits to the right being 

truncated. Thus, a computed three-year 

average ozone concentration of 0.0759 

ppm or lower would meet the standard, 

but 0.0760 ppm or higher is over the 

standard. 

EPA’s determination of attainment is 

based upon data that has been collected 

and quality-assured in accordance with 

40 CFR part 58 and recorded in EPA’s 

Air Quality System (AQS) database. 

Ambient air quality monitoring data for 

the three-year period must meet a data 

completeness requirement. The ambient 

air quality monitoring data 

completeness requirement is met when 

the three-year average of the percent (%) 

of required monitoring days with valid 

ambient monitoring data is greater than 

90%, and no single year has less than 

75% data completeness, as determined 

according to appendix P of part 50. 

Tables 1 and 2 show the data 

completeness and ozone design values, 

respectively, for each monitor in the 

Pittsburgh Area for the years 2013–2015. 

TABLE 1—2013–2015 PITTSBURGH AREA OZONE MONITOR DATA COMPLETENESS

County Site ID Percent data completeness 2013–2015 average percent 

completeness 

Comment 

2013 2014 2015 

Allegheny ........................... 420030008 98 100 95 98 

420030010 100 ........................ ........................ 33 Site shut down in 2013.a

420030067 99 99 100 99 

420031005 98 ........................ ........................ 33 97 Site shut down in 2013.b

420031008 ........................ 100 93 64 Site started 2014.b

Armstrong .......................... 420050001 95 100 100 98 

Beaver ................................ 420070002 98 96 97 97 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules 58437 

TABLE 1—2013–2015 PITTSBURGH AREA OZONE MONITOR DATA COMPLETENESS—Continued 

420070005 96 95 93 95 

420070014 89 99 94 94 

Washington ........................ 421250005 98 100 97 98 

421250200 98 98 100 98 

421255001 100 98 94 97 

421255200 99 99 ........................ 66 Site shut down in 2015.a

Westmoreland .................... 421290006 98 38 ........................ 45 Site shut down in July 2014.a

421290008 97 99 97 98 

Notes: 

aThe monitoring site shutdowns and startups are included in the Pennsylvania Department of the Environment’s (PADEP’s) July 2014 Annual 

Network Plan. PADEP submitted the monitoring plan to EPA on June 27, 2014, and EPA approved it on November 21, 2014. bThe ozone monitor at monitoring site 420031005 was moved to monitoring site 420031008 in February 2014. The new location is about one 

quarter of a mile away from the previous location, and is at a similar elevation. The data from these sites will be combined to calculate a valid design value. This monitor move was included in the Allegheny County Health Department’s (ACHD’s) July 2014 monitoring plan, which ACHD submitted to EPA on July 1, 2014, and which EPA approved on November 21, 2014. 

As shown in Table 1, several 

monitoring sites do not meet the 

completeness criteria set out in 40 CFR 

part 50, appendix P. However, the 

reasons for the completeness issues 

were either monitor shutdowns or 

startup, approved into PADEP’s and 

ACHD’s monitoring plans. Because 

three years of complete data is not 

possible at these monitoring sites, EPA 

does not look for valid design values at 

these sites. However, the circumstances 

are different for monitoring sites 

420031005 and 420031008. The ozone 

monitor was moved from monitoring 

site 420031005 to monitoring site 

420031008. These sites are within 0.25 

miles of each other, and are at similar 

elevations. Therefore, EPA is able to 

consider the data at both monitoring 

sites as representing the same area, and 

can combine the data for these two 

locations to calculate a valid design 

value. When data from both locations is 

considered, the three-year average 

completeness is 97%. 

TABLE 2—2013–2015 PITTSBURGH AREA 2008 OZONE DESIGN VALUES

County Site ID 

4th highest daily maximum 2013–2015 

Design value 

2013 2014 2015 (ppm) 

Allegheny ............................................................................. 420030008 0.070 0.065 0.071 0.068 

420030010 0.075 ........................ ........................ ........................

420030067 0.066 0.065 0.068 0.066 

420031005 0.076 0.042 ........................ 0.073 

420031008 ........................ 0.071 0.074 ........................

Armstrong ............................................................................. 420050001 0.078 0.068 0.070 0.072 

Beaver .................................................................................. 420070002 0.072 0.069 0.070 0.070 

420070005 0.072 0.070 0.067 0.069 

420070014 0.066 0.066 0.063 0.065 

Washington .......................................................................... 421250005 0.064 0.065 0.072 0.067 

421250200 0.067 0.064 0.069 0.066 

421255001 0.071 0.064 0.071 0.068 

421255200 0.063 0.062 0.045 ........................

Westmoreland ...................................................................... 421290006 0.067 0.053 ........................ ........................

421290008 0.070 0.064 0.069 0.067 

Note: Only valid design values for monitors meeting the completeness criteria are shown. 

Consistent with the requirements 

contained in 40 CFR part 50, EPA has 

reviewed the ozone ambient air quality 

monitoring data for the monitoring 

period from 2013 through 2015 for the 

Pittsburgh Area, as recorded in the AQS 

database. As shown in Table 2, all valid 

2013–2015 design values are less than 

or equal to 0.075 ppm. Therefore, the 

Pittsburgh Area has attained the 2008 

ozone NAAQS, considering 2013–2015 

data. 

III. Proposed Action 

EPA evaluated ozone data from air 

quality monitors in the Pittsburgh Area 

in order to determine the area’s 

attainment status under the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS. State and local agencies 

responsible for ozone air monitoring 

networks supplied and quality assured 

the data. All the monitoring sites with 

valid data had design values equal to or 

less than 0.075 ppm based on the 2013– 

2015 monitoring period. Considering 

that review, EPA has concluded that 

this area attained the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS based on complete, quality 

assured and certified data for the 2013– 

2015 ozone seasons. Thus, EPA 

proposes to determine, in accordance 

with its statutory obligations under 

section 181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA and the 

provisions of the SIP Requirements Rule 

(40 CFR 51.1103), that the Pittsburgh 

Area attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS 

by the applicable attainment date of July 

20, 2016. 

This proposed determination of 

attainment does not constitute a 

redesignation to attainment. 

Redesignations require states to meet a 

number of additional criteria, including 

EPA approval of a state plan to maintain 

the air quality standard for 10 years after 

redesignation. EPA is soliciting public 

comments on the issues discussed in 

this document. These comments will be 

considered before taking final action. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This rulemaking action proposes to 

make a determination of attainment on 

the 2008 ozone NAAQS based on air 

quality and, if finalized, would not 

impose additional requirements. For 

that reason, this proposed determination 

of attainment: 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
58438 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed rule, 

proposing to determine that the 

Pittsburgh Area attained the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS by its July 20, 2016 attainment 

date, does not have tribal implications 

as specified by Executive Order 13175 

(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 

because this proposed determination of 

attainment does not apply in Indian 

country located in the state, and EPA 

notes that it will not impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Ozone, Incorporation 

by reference, Intergovernmental 

relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: August 12, 2016. 

Shawn M. Garvin, 

Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2016–20313 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2013–0145; FRL–9951–30– 

Region 8] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; North 

Dakota; Revisions to Air Pollution 

Control Rules 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revisions submitted by the State of 

North Dakota on January 28, 2013 and 

April 22, 2014. The revisions are to 

Article 33–15 ‘‘Air Pollution Control’’ 

rules of the North Dakota 

Administrative Code. The revisions 

include amendments to update the 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

(PSD) rules and the definition of 

‘‘volatile organic compounds’’; to add 

particulate matter less than 2.5 microns 

in diameter (PM2.5) methods of 

measurement; to modify the PM2.5 state 

ambient air quality standard, 

permissible open burning rule, and 

permit fee processes; and, to remove 

permitting fees for sources that operate 

an air monitoring site. The revisions 

also make clarifying changes. This 

action is being taken under section 110 

of the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before September 26, 

2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– 

OAR–2013–0145 at http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.,) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Program, Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 

1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 

80202–1129. The EPA requests that if at 

all possible, you contact the individual 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section to view the hard copy 

of the docket. You may view the hard 

copy of the docket Monday through 

Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding 

federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jaslyn Dobrahner, Air Program, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR, 

1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 

80202–1129, (303) 312–6252, 

dobrahner.jaslyn@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

What should I consider as I prepare my 

comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting Confidential Business 

Information (CBI). Do not submit CBI to 

the EPA through http://

www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly 

mark the part or all of the information 

that you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information on a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to the EPA, mark the outside 

of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

• Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS