alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1033 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1033

   To authorize certain long-term contracts for Federal purchases of 
                                energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2021

 Mr. Welch (for himself and Mr. Norman) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
 addition to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize certain long-term contracts for Federal purchases of 
                                energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Renewable Energy Certainty Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTRACTS FOR FEDERAL PURCHASES OF ENERGY.

    (a) In General.--Part 3 of title V of the National Energy 
Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8251 et seq.) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 554. LONG-TERM CONTRACTS FOR ENERGY.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 501(b)(1)(B) of title 
40, United States Code, an agency may enter into a contract for the 
acquisition of energy generated from renewable energy sources or from 
cogeneration facilities covering a period of not more than 30 years.
    ``(b) Standardized Energy Purchase Agreement.--Not later than 90 
days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary, 
through the Federal Energy Management Program, shall publish a 
standardized energy purchase agreement, setting forth commercial terms 
and conditions, that agencies may use to acquire energy generated from 
renewable energy sources or from cogeneration facilities.
    ``(c) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide technical 
assistance to assist agencies in implementing this section.''.
    (b) Table of Contents Amendment.--The table of contents for such 
Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to such part 
3 the following new item:

``Sec. 554. Long-term contracts for energy.''.
                                 <all>
```
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 50909 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. D E L O R E S M A R T IN , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8
- CR- 1 3 1 6
- ALL B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e at t or ney appoi nt ed t o r epr es ent D el or es M ar t i n has m ove d f orl eave t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v. C a lif o rn ia , 386 U . S. 7 38 ( 19 67 ) . M ar t i n ha s no tf i l e d ar e s po ns e . O uri nde pe nde ntre vi e w of t he r e c o r d a n d co u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , c o u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e rr e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e AP P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. John Panos KISSONAS, aka John P. Kissonas, Defendant—Appellant.

Nos. 01-50587, 03-50243.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Miriam A. Krinsky, AUSA, John S. Gordon, AUSA, Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Michael J. Raphael, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.

John Panos Kissonas, Taft, CA, pro se.

Kenneth Miller, San Clemente, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

John Panos Kissonas appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for conspiracy, wire fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371 and 1343. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Kissonas has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgments are AFFIRMED. Kissonas’s second motion for an extension of time to file supplemental pleadings, received March 8, 2004, is DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Dennis DELMORAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4030

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Coughlin v. State*, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); *Shortridge v. State*, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882342
<NAME> 90CC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          75,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,345
<PP&E>                                       5,758,789
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,552,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,327,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,301,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,327,955
<SALES>                                        228,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               230,925
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  231,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (448)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0004497

22-JAN-2015

08:49 AM
t -/y^/^<::/^'/'/SAr ^r£/^^ -r ^z-"y-V>;• 2015OEC28 RH»-29

•=> -D T^» »»« > '

^jA^ ^ ./nrr^/l^<A' Ay y'^wr

yZc-'/Z ^^v- /\/Ay'/^Z^cZ /<^zyzr y^e>ZZ^^'-"'^'A' ^^

L ,^-y/^'A/«z/&/' y

^ -' V

/S, cjJyzc^/^y'yM/ze./ yy/'^zZ^^A y^^/'Z'zzyytxz',**z' /fz^-'^yz". . .- . . ^

^/'/•^ yzzy y/r.yy. zyy^y^z^y^'y

i .- yyv-^^ yyA^Zy /^?^fffZ:cyef-Z^y/A>tryZ*^tfZ^/zf Z^y^y ^i-ZZZZ y<-zyzy^_

» ^ ^

.,^ ^'\, yz^f/yzccZze^ yy yyy^-w^-vc-^^ ^ ?^Az^

'"jj ^

:.L -_ - / y^yAy'/^y yc'/:T ^y^iy-y ^ .<A'za-<z *yz<zz<^Zizyzf c^ ^

. /• yV yZ/z/zzz/^^z^ z^z^tzzj-y^ -••^<-A-'i- , <r •# ^

_ . .yvyvv^^w^ ^5^ z^/y ^y c y-z y^zzyz^^^^^* / ^yzcc/zKZ'^y'y z"zrrttr.c^ALgy»y_

_ j^Azy-iTas/z/^zfy y^yyys^^^czT.

T'-j'-^.i" y^y^^zy-^z^z^ zZ^y-^^y yeZy'z>-y''Zy^.'-~ Z' /Jr-z yZ j _ •^ - — - - -- •• --•• —<=--' ——.—•jK;'

.yLzA^y jAzizye^iryy As> y^y^zAzy y^zyy^zt^.-^^Ay /^AyA yizy^^z^y Ayzy

/2r yZyfi^zya,rzfA._y^y€> Ay

yz^yZy-yy/oy-^Af/^y

.yVyr^ zy^aCczAcy^^yef 0 _

TzZAdT zryyc'^ycf^ /Azy y//zpzzy i^zzz^y/cc^zZacA^ ^

y^zzA'^ y? yz/yzAzz^yzy yy^y^ yyy^'-zzZ^ yy^y zzz/

yyzczz'zttz^-^ y^yzAZ' ^ayz^zzz^<^ zS^ y'y.

c=y^^yiyy yyy^':- y^ —yzzy/Ay. y^-zy^ //e^y^/y^

./^Zjtr/tzZ^A 9 _Z^z^fyy^x^zy '^'^^ZyyAz^_ cyzzZZ^ZZjZ .^^'Zzyzzy

_i ty^ZyZzzyef^i^cyZ7 yirz^rzC z^/A^ _ Z^Zcf yZZ-Z Az> ^
Addendum No. 1 dated March 21, 2008 to the Contract for Construction and Sale



 Exhibit 4.31 
 ADDENDUM Nr. 1 to a 
 CONTRACT dated 24th January 2008 made between 
 DRILLSHIP SKOPELOS OWNERS INC. (1) 
 and 
 SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD (2) 
 relating to the construction and sale 
 of 
 DRILLSHIP HULL NO. 1866

  
  
 WHEREAS: 
  

	 (A)
	 pursuant to Clause 4(a)(ii) of Article II of the contract dated 24th January 2008 (the “Contract”) and made between (1) Drillship Skopelos Owners Inc. of The Marshall Islands (the “Buyer”) and
(2) Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd of Korea (the “Builder”), it was agreed that Thirty Nine Million Five Hundred Seventy Five Thousand United States Dollars (US$39,575,000) (the “Second Part of the First
Installment”) would be payable by the Buyer to the Builder on 24th March 2008; and 


  

	(B)	the parties to the Contract have agreed to enter into this Addendum Nr. 1 in order to amend both Clause 4(a)(ii) and the last paragraph of Article II of the Contract.


 NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: 
 Words and expressions defined in the Contract shall, unless the context otherwise requires or unless otherwise defined herein, have the same meaning when used in this Addendum Nr. 1. 
 In consideration of the Buyer paying to the Builder the sum of Ten Million United States Dollars (US$10,000,000),
being part only of the Second Part of the First Instalment, no later than 26th March 2008, the Builder hereby agrees that the remaining balance
of the Second Part of the First Instalment, being the sum of Twenty Nine Million Five Hundred Seventy Five Thousand United States Dollars (US$29,575,000) shall be paid by the Buyer to the Builder on 24 April 2008. 
 It is further agreed by the parties that, if the Contract is terminated by the Buyer on or before 24 April 2008, the payment of US$20,000,000 shall be forfeited by
the Buyer and the Buyer shall indemnify the Builder on production of invoices or other documentary evidence by the Builder for any damages or expenses whatsoever in excess of US$20,000,000 incurred by the Builder up to the date of termination.

 Save as amended and restated by this Addendum Nr. 1, the provisions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and the Contract and this
Addendum Nr. 1 shall be read and construed as one instrument. 
 This 21st day of March 2008. 
  

									
	Signed for and behalf of	 		 	Signed for and behalf of
			
	DRILLSHIP SKOPELOS OWNERS INC.	 		 	SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD
			
	 


	 		 	 



	By:	 	

	 		 	By:	 	Harris Lee
	Title:	 	Attorney-In-Fact	 		 	Title:	 	Vice President

 
  

													
					
	In the presence of:	 		 		 		 	In the presence of:
					
	 


	 		 		 	  
	 	 



	VICTORIA LIAOU	 		 		 		 	Tony T. N. Kim
		 		 		 		 	Branch Manager
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of**

**Chief Executive Officer**

**of TGC Industries, Inc. Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, of TGC Industries, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Wayne A. Whitener, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| Date:   March 18, 2011 | By:    | /s/   Wayne A. Whitener                 |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Wayne   A. Whitener                     |
|                        |   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |   | (Principal   Executive Officer)         |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 94 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 94

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
 Education relating to ``Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, 
 and Selection Criteria-Expanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter 
 Schools Program (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity Grants); 
  Grants to Charter Management Organizations for the Replication and 
 Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to 
 Charter School Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and 
   for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools 
                         (Developer Grants)''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2022

Mr. Moolenaar (for himself, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Owens, Mrs. Steel, Mr. Jacobs 
    of New York, Mr. Schweikert, and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
 Education relating to ``Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, 
 and Selection Criteria-Expanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter 
 Schools Program (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity Grants); 
  Grants to Charter Management Organizations for the Replication and 
 Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to 
 Charter School Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and 
   for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools 
                         (Developer Grants)''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to ``Final 
Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria-Expanding 
Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools Program (CSP)-Grants to 
State Entities (State Entity Grants); Grants to Charter Management 
Organizations for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter 
Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to Charter School Developers for the 
Opening of New Charter Schools and for the Replication and Expansion of 
High-Quality Charter Schools (Developer Grants)'' (87 Fed. Reg. 40406; 
published July 6, 2022), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Learn more at www.nationalguard.mil

Current as of August 2022 Point of Contact: NGB Public Affairs at (703) 607-2612

Potential Missions:

• Site security

• Roadblocks and checkpoints

• Civil disturbance control

• Critical infrastructure protection

• Personnel security

Unique Capabilities:

• Organic personal

protective gear (face shields,

body shields, body armor and

shin guards)

• Organic counter-personnel

equipment – TASERs,

Oleoresin Capsicum Spray

and batons

• Logistically self sustaining up

to 72 hours

National Guard Reaction Force

Critical to the first line of defense in counter-terrorism 

Mission: The NGRF is a specially trained force comprised of Soldiers and

Airmen from existing NG units that provide each state, territory, and the District

of Columbia with a rapid response capability focused on incidents requiring 

law enforcement or security support.

The NGRF is designed to respond to an incident ahead of federal assets and

capable of delivering an initial force of 75-125 personnel within eight hours and 

a follow-on force of up to 375 personnel within 24 hours.

All the NGRFs are organized as temporary task forces and perform their

mission primarily under the command and control of their home state,

territory or District of Columbia. 

Highlights
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,575
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,900
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,475)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (3,575)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,575)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### People v Guinn,

No. 91048;

Court of Appeals No. 130783.
# Key Project Personnel

Robert Malcomson, MWH

Robert P. Stevens, P.E., Project Integration, Inc.

David Kirby

– Project Integration, Inc.

Charles Busch

– John Deere, Des Moines Works

Tonya Duren

– Project Integration, Inc.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In
      connection with the Annual Report of The Center for Wound Healing, Inc; (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
      G. Barnett, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
      that:




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      September 25, 2008




/s/
                Andrew G. BarnettAndrew
                G. Barnett, Chief Executive Officer andChief
                Financial Officer