p. 1 

# OAR Box 1796 Prepped byKeeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 33 ) IV-H-5

9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37PM

Sheet 33 of 107P. 2 ft/22/02 FRI16:1 2 FA X91 9 541_550 9 NDU-21-200 2 2i:i B OP GII GEP

A (2)00 9 PAGf

To : Fox# : Prom : FA XTRANSMISSIO N OFFIC E O F INFORMATIO N AN D R£6ULATOFL VAFFAIR S OFFIC E Q?

MANAGEMEN TAN D BUDGE T NATURA L RESOURCES . ENga& yAN O ASWCULTUD C BRANC H 72 5 17t h Street , NW . Roo m 1020 2 Washington . _C

205O 3 Office : 202-395-3084/F« : 202-395-72B 5 

# L/ri Arf cfJisefL 1'7-677-&S7 Date . Pages ; ) Ar t Fraa s ) Ric h Therou x ) Ji m Lait y ) Amand a Le e

, S l ^Am yFarrel l ) Bryo n Alle n ) Margi e Malanosk . ) Davi d Rostke r ) Rut h Salomo n ) Edmcn d To y includin g this ; cove rsheet .

1 

### NO V2 2 200 2

Comments : 

# Li i/ i 

### y\ 

# 9°^

f QJI\SU 

# msho^ o^ ruleAU

# fisk... 7TV

/ ^^ ^ ^^^ 3 ^// /rUkt. 

# r

F*J(SH?GT.*tt »P. 3

NOU^l-200 2 21=10. „ w ^ f c - P " 05/23 E|OO 2

InternalandDeliberativeDraft- Donotquote , cite , copy , ordistribute .

51.165 Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02 (D ) Thi s definitio n shal l no t appl ywit hrespec t t o a particula r regulate d NS R pollutan t whe n th e majo r stationary sourc e i s complying wit hth e requirement s unde r paragrap h (f ) o f thi s sectio n fo r s^PALs
- fo r tha t pollutant . Instead , th e definitio n a t paragraph , (f ) (2 ) (viii ) o f thi s sectio n shal l apply . (vi)(A ) Net_emission s increas e means * wit hrespec t t o an yregulate d NS R pollutan t emitte d fay a majo r stationary source , th e amoun t b ywhic hthe su

mo f the following exceed s zero : (1 ) Th e increas e i n emission s from a particula r physica l chang e o r chang e i n the metho d o f operatio n a t a stationarysourcs^/affi^ ^ 

### (f^trW^f^^^^m^^^: an d (2.) Anyothe r increase s an d decrease s i n actua l emission s a t th e majo r stationarysourc e tha t ar e contemporaneou s wit hthe particula r chang e an d ar e otherwis e creditable . Baselin e kcfe^l-Tiemissions fo r calculating increase s an

d decrease s unde r thi s paragraph (a ) (1 ) (vi ) (A ) (i£ ) shal l b a determine d a s provide d i n paragrap h(a ) (1 ) (xxxv ) o f thi s section , excep t tha t paragraph s (a ) (1 ) (xxxv ) (A ) '_) an d (a ) (1 ) (xxxv ) (B ) (it* ) o f thi s sectio n shal l no t ap p 1 y-~P r'scn'cl 6

soot a ao-avw a vd a s a isc z T? S 6T 6 XV J LS-QO20/22/1 1P. 4 P02/2 3 NOU-21-2002 21 ! 0 8 r

- ^* "

Internal , an dDeliherafcivQ

- Dra£t

- D o no t quota , «ifee , copy , o r dia-triiute . Novejttbaa : 19 , 20p 2 ^"" ^ relevan t terminologyfo r calculatin g a pua t modifii-abioi i fchanaeVpre-chancr e emissions—rrrcreaise ' fo r mos t application s i s no w"baselin e actua l emissions " rathe r tha n "actua l emissions. ^ Yo u ma yus e an yconsecutiv e 24-mont hperio d i n th e pas t -I

O year s t o determin e you r baselin e actua l emissions . Second , w e ar e supplementin g th e existin g •^ctual^lt o potentia l " a ctua'l^o-po t en tia l applicabilit ytes t wit ha n ^actua l Lo pioiairted-a£taal fl 'act lual-to-pro1ected
actual ' applicabilit ytes t fo r determinin g i f a non-routin e physica l o r operationa l change
- a t a n existin g emission s uni t wil l resul t i n a n emission s increase . Notwithstandin g th e ne wtest , yo u wil l stil l hav e th e abilit yt o conduc t a n "actua l to-poleritdAl^gctual-to-potentia l typ e tes t withi n th e ne w"actua l to/j± uje.i-.Lfaq

- ac t ua l "actual
- to-proiec t ed
- .actua l applicabilit ytest . I n thi s case , yo u wil l no t b e
vV ({ri. ltU>V\ A« * ' -• • —"

- subjec t t o cMKi n recordkeepin g requirement s tha t *woulel O £&/•*& ac W afehcrxwliifc . apply T &>rV^nR^' Fo r EUSGUs , w e ar e makin g severa l change s t o th e ^ ^^'^<^x]rw\) existin g procedure s and ar e codifyin g ou r curren t polic yfo r calculatin g th e baselin e actua l emissions . Tha t is , th e baselin e actua l emission s fo r .EUSGU s i s th e averag e rate , i n ton s ivei : •vcarrt-Qy , a t whic htha t th e uni t actuall yemitte d th e pollutan t durin g a 2-yea r (consecutiv e 24-month ) perio d 2 0

coo ®ao-avw a va a s nisc z it-s ei e XV J i,c:9 0 20/22/1 1__ES_ J.l/22/0 2 06:3 6 FA X91 9 54 1 235 7 U S EP AEMAD-O

D ®00 2

• NDU-21-280 2 21'0 9

Interna l.an dDeliberativ eDraft

- D o no t quoto , eito , copy- , o r distribute . 

# v H ^ ^ ^f^rac^ ) o r report—yott r post-chang e emission s

A s discusse d earlier , th e cn-greiT t regulation s provi d tha t whe n you r emission s unit , othe r tha n an eleut'riL . uLl^il ystrea

migener&tin

g uni t '(EUSGUS , "ha s no t begu n norma l operations, " actua l emission s equa l th e PT E o f th e unit . Ther e ha«rv

e bee n considerabl e issue s raise d wit hthi s approach . Fo r example , using potentia l L u emiLPrF . a s a measur e o f post-chang e emission s automaticall yattribute s al l possibl e emission s increase s t o th e change . Ther e ar e man ycases , however , wher e thi s simpl yi s no t true . Moreover , whe n th e actual-to-potentia l tes t i s applied ^ i t i s automaticall yassume d tha t th e emission s uni t ha s no t begu n norma l operation s afte r th e chang e period . I n many suc hcases , however , th e change d uni t a s a practica l matte r wil l functio n essentiall ya s i t di d befor e th e change . W e are , therefore , allowin g al l existin g emission s unit s t o us e a n actual-to-pr o jected-actua l Cauia-s-iuiigapplicabi. l j^ ytest . Accordingly ^ w e ar e eliminating th e termv,v begu n norma l operations " fromth e determinatio n o f whethe r a chang e result s i n a significan t emission s increase. 1 7

W e d o mak e us e o f th e term"resume s regula r operations " (a s oppose d t o "norma l operations" ) i n th e -fina l rule-—B ^ bu t tha t term

ha s a verydifferen t meanin g and w e ar e usin g i r fo r a n entirel ydifferen t purpose . Specifically , w e ar e 5 1P. 6

NQU-21-200 2 2 1 '• 0 9 P . 04/2 3

Internal , and ' Deliberativ e Draft
- D o not quote , aite , copy , o r distribute . tfovembar 10, . 200 2 th e selecte d 24-mont hbaselin e perio d and i s no t relate d t o th e change . Accordingly , yo u wil l calculat e th e unit' s projecte d actua l emission s a s th e produc t of : (1 ) th e hourl y emission s rate , whic hi s base d on th e emission s unit' s operationa l capabilitie s following th e change(s) , takin g int o accoun t legall yenforceabl e restriction s tha t coul d affec t th e hourl yemission s rat e followin g th e change(s) ; an d (2) l

_th e projecte d leve l o f utilization , whic hi s base d o n bot hth e emission s unit' s historica l annua l utilizatio n rat e an d availabl e informatio n regardin g th e emission s

L^-chanq

e capacit yutilization . I n calculatin g th e projecte d actua l emissions , yo u shoul d ' -conside r bot hth e expecte d an d th e highes t projection s o f th e busines s activit ytha t yo u expec t coul d b e achieve d and tha t ar e consisten t wit hinformatio n you r companypublishe s Afo r business-relate d purposes - suc ha s a stockholde r \ (* • yy | prospectus , o r application s fo r busines s loans. ] „„whe n • determinin g projecte d actua l emission s befor e beqjj-wrfrnc T ijaatual construction , vo u mus t crgT i Us ) that , .ar e the vresume. , norma l op e rat i 00,7^

1 From th e initia l calculation , yo u ma ythe n mak e th e appropriat e adjustmen t t o subtrac t ou t any,portio n o f 

# tli t 64 ^ \

voo® ao-avw ava as n iSC 2 T^ S 6T 6 XV d IC:9 0 20/22/T TP. 7

NDU-21-20B 2 21=1 0 r.lflb-'ti ^ LgJUUa ]

Internalan dDeliberativ eDraft - D ono tquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute .

5L16 5 Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02

fC ) An increas e o r decreas e i n actua l emission s i s Creditabl e onl yif : (i. ) I t occur s withi n a reasonabl e perio d t o b e specifie d byth e reviewing authority ; and (<2 ) Th e reviewin g authorit yha s no t relie d o n i t i n issuin g a permi t fo r th e sourc e unde r regulation s approve d pursuan t t o thi s section , whic hpermi t i s i n effec t whe n th e increas e i n actua l emission s fromth e particula r chang e occurs ; and (2 ) Th e increas e o r decreas e i n emission s di d no t occu r a t a Clea n Unit , excep t a s provide d i n paragraph s (c)(8 ) and (d)(10 ) o f thi s section .

• * * * * 

### (E ) + • * * (2 ) I t i s enforceabl e a s a practica l matte r a t an d afte r th e tim e tha t actua l constructio n o n th e particula r chang e begins ? and

•A- * * * * •A ) I t ha s approximatel yth e sam e qualitativ e 7

900 ® ao-avwavaas n ISC Z Tl- S 6T 6 XV dZ, C = 9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP. 8

NQU-21-200 2 21=1 0 r• K > < ' £l. J



# w-z

Interna lan

dDeliberativeDraft

- Do no t quote , cite , copy , o r

distribute . 51.165 Amendator

y Languag e11/19/02 jTe^^-^enforceabi e durin g th e consecutiv e 24-mont hperiod . (3 ) Whe n a projec t involve s yliysslca l uhiunyu ^ t o o r uhaiaiyui , i n Llmmt-lhu J o f uperatio n u f multipl e emission s .units , onl yon e consecutiv e 24-mont hperio d ma yb e use d t o determin e th e baselin e actua l emission s fo r th e emission s unit s bein g changed . (±) Th e averag e rat e shal l no t b e base d o n an y consecutiv e 24-mont hperio d fo r whic hther e i s inadequat e formatio n fo r determinin g annua l emissions , i n ton s pe r year , an

d fo r adjustin g thi s amoun t i f require d byparagrap h (a ) (1 ) (xxxv ) (A ) (2. ) o f thi s section . (B ) Fo r an existin g emission s uni t (othe r tha n a n electri c utilit ysteam generatin g unit) , baselin e actua l emission s mean s th e averag e rate , i n ton s pe r year , a t whic h th e emission s uni t actuall yemitte d th e pollutan t durin g any consecutiv e 24-mont hperio d selecte d byth e owne r o r operato r withi n th e 10-yea r perio d immediatel yprecedin g eithe r th e dat e th e owne r o r operato r begin s actua l constructio n o f th e project , o r th e dat e a complet e permi t applicatio n i s receive d b yth e reviewin g authorit yfo r a permi t require d eithe r unde r thi s sectio n o r unde r a pla n approve d fayth e Administrator , whicheve r i s earlier , excep t tha t th e 10-yea r perio d shal l no t includ e an yperio d earlie r 2 0

L00_ ao-avw a vd a s n £SC Z T? S 6T 6 XVd LZ-90ZO/ZZ/T tP. 9

NO U.-21-200 2 21:1 1 r . tuo ' c- i

Interna) andDeliberativeDraft- Donotquote, cite , copy , ordistribute .

5L165Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02 tha n Novembe r 15 , 1990 . U J Th e averag e rat e shal l includ e fugitiv e emission s t o th e exten t quantifiable , an d emission s associate d wit h startups , shutdowns , an d malfunctions . (Z.) Th e averag e rat e shal l b e adjuste d downwar d t o exclud e an

ynon-eompllan t emission s tha t occurre d whil e the sourc e wa s operating abov e an emissio n limitatio n tha t wa s A&f^n''

I'^tf^li^-enforceabl e during the consecutiv e 24-mont hperiod . &*" n(^ ) Th e averag e rat e shal l b e adjuste d downwar d t o

' exclud e an yemission s tha t woul d hav e exceede d an emissio n limitatio n wit hwhic hthe majo r stationarysourc e mus t currentl ycomply , had suc hmajo r stationarysourc e bee n require d t o compl ywit hsuc hlimitation s during the consecutiv e 24-mont hperiod . However , i f a n emissio n limitatio n i s par t o f a maximu machievabl e contro l technologystandard tha t th e Administrato r propose d o r promulgate d unde r par t 6 3 o f thi s chapter , th e baselin e actua l emission s nee d onl yb e adjuste d i f th e stat e ha s take n credi t fo r suc hemission s reduction s i n an attainmen t demonstratio n o r maintenanc e pla n consisten t wit hthe requirement s o f paragraph(a)(3)(li)(G ) o f thi s section . (4. ) Whe n a projec t involve s physica l Uiangij & L a uj . changc-a . i n tl' miriethu Uo f opui-ntiu

n o£ multipl e emission s 2 1



### 800 ® " • ao-avwa vd a s nzsc z T^ S 

### exe xva 8C=9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP.1 0

NOU-21-200 2 21:1 1 K.yy/^ j V\5^ a1 l£OO 0

InternalandDeliberativeDraft

- D o no t quote , cite , copy , or

distribute . 51.165 Amendatoiy Languag e11/19/0 2 preconstructio npermi t progra mtha t

ha s bee napprove db y th e .Administrato r

an dincorporate dint o th eState'a, 1 •PittyleaneBUtttLiui

i Plan 1 (th eplant

- t o implemen t th erequirement s o f §51-16 6 o f

thi s s'hapteiyigcfl'ori^^p^ . o r unde r th e progra mi n§52.2 1 o f thi s chapter . mamtBmsemitmsia^iii^siLwm. 

# Mtt



# atfmfel (2 ) Applicabilit yprocedures . / t ^c^ i /^)/ X (i ) Eac hpla n shal l adop t a preconstructip n revie w progra m

t o satisf yth e requirement s o f sections/17 2 (b ) (6) / 172(c)(5) / and 17 3 o f the Ac t fo r an yare a designate d nonattainmen t fo r an ynationa l ambien t ai r qualit ystandar d unde r 4 0 CF R81.30 0 _____[. Suc ha progra mshal l appl yt o anyne wmajo r stationarysourc e o r majo r modificatio n tha t i s majo r fo r th e pollutan t fo r whic hth e are a i s designate d nonattainmen t unde r sectio n 107(d)(l ) (A ) (i ) o f th e Act , i f th e stationar ysourc e o r modificatio n woul d locat e anywher e i n th e designate d nonattainmen t area . (ii ) Eac hpla n shal l us e th e specifi c provision s o f paragraph s (a)(2)(ii)(A ) through(F ) o f thi s section . Deviation s fromthes e provision s wil l b e approve d onl yi f th e Stat e specificall ydemonstrate s tha t th e submitte d provision s ar e mor e stringen t tha n o r a t leas t a s stringen t 2 5

600 ® ao-avw a va a s n 1SC Z IP S 6T 6 XV d 8C:9 0 Z0/ZZ/T TP.1 1

. NOU-21-200 2 21=1 2 p . im/ii j ifyuu /

InternalandDeliberativeDraft- D o notquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute .

51.16 5 Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02 thes e unit s befor e th e projec t equal s o r exceed s th e significan t amoun t fo r tha t pollutan t (as define d i n paragrap h(a ) (l)(x ) o f thi s section) . (E ) Emis5ionjtas_t_fo r project s tha t involv e clea n Units . Fo r a projec t tha t wil l b e constructe d and operate d a t a clea n Uni t withou t causing th e emission s -uni t t o los e it s Clean.Uni t status ! 

# 1____W^ oce^ Kt o < n o emission s increas e i s

occur . (F ) Hybri d tes t fo r project s tha t involv e multipl e type s o f emission s units . Asignifican t emission s increas e o f a regulate d NS R pollutan t i s projecte d t o occu r i f th e su mo f th e emission s increase s fo r eac hemission s unit , usin g th e metho d specifie d i n paragraph s (a)(2)(ii)(C ) throug h(E ) o f thi s sectio n a s applicabl e wit hrespec t t o eac hemission s "unit , fo r eac htyp e o f emission s uni t equal s o r exceed s th e significan t amoun t fo r tha t pollutan t (as define d i n paragrap h'(a ) (1 ) (x ) o f thi s section ) . Fo r example , i f a projec t involve s bot ha n existin g emission s uni t and a Clea n Unit , th e projecte d increas e i s determine d bysummin g th e value s determine d usin g th e metho d specifie d i n paragrap h(a)(2)(ii)(C ) o f thi s sectio n fo r th e existin g uni t and usin g th e metho d specifie d i n paragrap h (a)(2 ) (ii ) (E ) o £ tJj-i s sectio n fo r th e Clea n Unit . (iii ) Stwpla n shal l requir e tha t fo r an ymajo r 2 3

0T0L£ | ao-avm a va a s n £SC Z Tt- S 6T 6 XVd 8 C = 9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP.1 2

NOV-21-200 2 21:1 2 r • LL '

£±J

-

Internalan

dDeliberativeDraft

- Do notquote, cite , copy , ordistribute . 51.165 Amendator

yLanguag

e11/19/02 stationarysourc e fo r whiu hLl m njui.-wii.-

g aufchvj.iL

ylia ^ t=rs»t-Bljli3he

d - a PA L fo r a regulate d NS R pollutant , th e majo r stationarysourc e shal l compl ywit hrequirement s unde r paragrap h(f ) o f thi s section . (iv ) Tjfijxpla

n shal l requir e tha t 'if^^si^ik^hW^t^^^&ii aniaas^i^JRf^'-MxPCP

g {a s define d i n paragraphU ) (l ) (xxv ) o f thi s section ) shal l compl ywit hth e requirement s unde r paragrap h(e ) o f thi s section . (3 ) * + * (ii ) * * * (H ) Decrease s i n actua l emission s resulting fromthe installatio n of
- add-o n contro l technolog yo r applicatio n o f pollutio n preventio n measure s tha t wer e relie d upo n i n designating an emission s uni t a s a Clean Uni t o r a projec t a s a PC P canno t b e use d a s offsets . (I ) Decrease s i n actua l emission s occurring a t a Clea n Uni t canno t b e use d a s offsets / excep t a s provide d i n paragraph s (c)(8 ) an d (d)(10 ) o f thi s section . Similarly , decrease s i n actua l emission s occurring a t a PC P canno t b e use d a s offsets , excep t a s provide d i n paragrap h(e)(6)(iv ) o f thi s section . (J ) Th e tota l tonnag e o f increase d emissions / i n ton s pe r year / resulting froma majo r modificatio n tha t mus t b e offse t i n accordanc e wit hsectio n 17 3 o f th e Ac t shal l b e 

### 2 9

TTot aao-avwa " vaas uz,scz xt- s exexvasc-9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP.1 3

NOU-21-200 2 21:1 2

—- " - l-Mai/da i

InternalandDeliberativeDraft- D o no tquote , cite , copy , ordistribute .

S1.16S Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02 emissio n limitation s o r wor k practic e requirement s i n th e permi t fo r th e uni t tha t wer e adopte d i n conjunctio n wit h LAE R o r th e projec t woul d alte r an yphysica l o r operationa l characteristic s tha t forme d th e basi s fo r th e LAE R determinatio n a s specifie d i n paragrap h(c ) (6 ) (iv ) o f thi s section , the n th e emission s uni t lose s it s v t a t u^^^j^^j^ij i a s a Clea n Uni t upo n issuanc e o f th e necessar ypermi t revision s (unles s th e uni t requalifie s a s a Clea n uni t pursuan t t o paragrap h(c)(3)(iii ) o f thi s section) . I f th e owne r o r operato r begin s actua l constructio n o n th e projec t withou t firs t applying t o revj.se th e emission s unit' s permit , th s Clea n Uni t i a I & t Ubj^p^p^pf f end s immediatel y prio r t o th e time whe n actua l constructio n begins . (iv ) A.projec t tha t cause s a n emission s uni t t o los e it s stat^^g Ma s a clea n Uni t i s subjec t t o th e applicabilit yrequirea&nt s o f paragrap h(a ) (2 ) (ii ) (A ) throug h(D)/o f thi s sectio n a s i f th e emission s uni t i s no t a Clea n Unit . (v ) Certai n .Emission s Unit s wit hPS D permits . Fo r emission s unit s tha t mee t th e requirement s o f paragrap h (c ) (2 ) (v ) (4§ ) and (£]| ) o f thi s section , th e BAC T leve l o f emission s reduction s $as®5B ^ x satisf yth e requiremen t fo r LAE R i n meetin g th e requirement s fo r clea n Unit s unde r paragraph s (c)(3 ) throug h(8 . o f thi s 

### 3 5

U mqO-QVK3 Vd 3 S Q L , U m6T 6^ fi , :fln, n/77 ~P.1 4

NOU-21-200 2 2i : 1 3 r . J.ai/<i J 1001 0

Internalan dDeliberativeDraft- D o no tquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute .

SM6 S Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02

Th e emission s uni t mus t hav e receive d a PS D permi t withi n th e las t 1 0 year s and suc hpermi t mus t requir e th e emission s uni t t o compl ywit hBACT . (;g$| ) Th e emission s uni t mus t b e locate d i n a n are a tha t wa s redesignate d a s nonattainmen t fo r th e relevan t pollutant(s ) afte r issuanc e o f th e PS D permi t an d befor e th e effectiv e dat e o f th e clea n Uni t Tes t provision s i n th e area , (3 ) Qualifyin g o r re-qualifYinquto

_use . the_Clea n Uni t applicabilit ytest . A n emission s uni t automaticall y qualifie s a s a Clea n Uni t whe n th e uni t meet s th e criteri a belo wl n paragraph s (c)(3)(i ) an d (ii ) o f thi s section . Afte r th e origina l Clea n Uni t s-tTgttng^s^iMSW ^ expire s i n accordanc e wit hparagrap h(c)(5 ) of/thi s sectio n o r i s los t pursuan t t o paragrap h(c ) (2 ) (iii ) o c thi s section , suc h emission s uni t ma yre-qualif ya s a Clea n Uni t unde r eithe r paragrap h(c ) (3 ) (iii ) below , o r undfe r th e Clea n Uni t provision s i n paragrap h(d ) o f thi s teection. T o re-qualif y 

# 'cku*****^

CTO ® ao-avH a va a sa iSC Z "I^ S 6T 6 XV

d 6C:9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP.1 5

.LA ' *-•*. ' NDU-21-20B 2 21:1 4

InternalandDeliberativeDraft- Do notquote, cite , copy , ordistribute .

51.165 Amendator

yLanguag

e11/19/02 standard , uncontrolled , ne wemission s uni t o f th e same type . CB ) Th e owne r o r operato r mad e an investmen t t o instal l th e contro l technology . Fo r th e purpos e o f thi s determination , an investmen t include s expense s t o researc h th e applicatio n o f a pollutio n preventio n techniqu e t o th e emission s uni t o r expense s t o appl ya pollutio n preventio n techniqu e t o an emission s unit . (iii ) Re-ggalifvin a fo r &fieS;Clean Uni t .tesl^'ajfa-aii . Th e emission s uni t mus t obtai n a ne w majo r NS R permi t tha t require s complianc e wit hth e current dayLAER , an

d th e emission s uni t mus t mee t th e requirement s i n paragraph s Cc ) (3 ) (i ) an d (c ) (3 ) (ii ) above / (4 ) Effectiv e dat e o f ^I^Clea n Uni t &Latugde33h-q4^41on . Th e effectiv e dat e o f a n emission s unit' s Clea n Uni t stflLu&'d^s^^^t'i'^Ja , (tha t is , the dat e o n whic hth e owne r o r operato r maybsgi n t o us e th e Clea n Uni t Tes t t o determin e whethe r a projec t a t th e emission s uni t i s a majo r modification ) i s determined-according t o th e applicabl e paragrap h(c ) (4)(i ) o r (c ) (4 ) (ii ) below . (i ) Origina l Clea n Uni t tia^uiF'&^-xTt^^^. an d emission s unit s that . re-auali f va s Clean unit s -bv; implementing a . new,contro l technolog yt o mee t current-day ;LAER. - Th e effectiv e dat e i s the dat e th e emission s unit' s ai r pollutio n contro l technolog yi s place d int o service , o r 

### 3 8



### no_ ao-avK a va a sa iSC Z Tfr S 6T 6 XV

J 6C:9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP.1 6

NOU-21-200 2 21J1 4 uuv >" $01 2

InternalandDeliberativeDraft- D o notquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute .

51.16 5 AmendatoryLanguage11/19/02 restriction s fo r on e pollutan t affect s Clea n Uni t sLatug^e^^^a^^Jfci i onl yfo r tha t pollutant . (i ) Th e Clea n Uni t mus t compl ywit hth e emissio n limitation(s ) and/o r wor k practic e requirement s adopte d i n conjunctio n wit hth e LAE R tha t i s recorde d i n th e majo r NS R permit , an d subsequentl yreflecte d i n th e titl e vpermit . (A ) Th e owne r o r operato r ma yno t mak e a physica l chang e i n o r chang e i n th e metho d o f operatio n o f th e Clea n Uni t tha t cause s th e emission s uni t t o functio n i n a manne r tha t i s inconsisten t wit hth e physica l o r operationa l characteristic s tha t forme d th e basi s fo r th e LAE R determinatio n (e.g. , possibl yth e emission s unit' s capacit y o r throughput) . (B ) Th e clea n Uni t ma vno t emi t abov e a leve l tha t has . (ii ) Th e Clea n Uni t mus t compl ywit han yterm s an d condition s i n th e titl e V permi t relate d t o th e unit' s Clea n Uni t j ta t us' g (iii ) Th e Clea n Uni t mus t continu e t o contro l emission s usin g th e specifi c ai r pollutio n contro l technolog ytha t wa s th a basi s fo r it s Clea n Uni t .bLa,LLL-bii&ls-f,OH&glb'h . I f th e emission s uni t o r contro l technolog yi s replaced , the n th e Clea n Uni t ^taLus^iss^itliat^; ^ ends . 

### 4 3

sioia ao-avn a vaa s n zsc z u s ex e xv a 6 C = 9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP.1 7

NOU-21-200 2 21=1 4 P.16/2 3 Ig/U U

Internal andDeliberativeDraft- Do notquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute .

51.16 5 Amendatdr

yLanguage11/19/0 2 (8 ) _0_ff.S£_t,5 , and nettin g at , Clea n Units . Emission s change s tha t occu r a t a Clea n Uni t mus t no t b e include d i n calculatin g a significan t ne t emission s increas e (tha t is , mus t no t b e use d i n a "nettin g analysis") , o r b e use d fo r generatin g offset s unles s suc hus e occur s befor e th e effectiv e dat e O f t'K'e^Clean Uni t status^s'^gri-ajfeiili'^ . o r afte r th e Clea n Uni t statuh^^ifeqjsafeiJ&B i expires ; or , unles s th e emission s uni t reduce s emission s belo wth e leve l tha t qualifie d th e uni t a s a Clea n Unit . However , i f th e Clea n Uni t reduce s emission s belo wth e leve l tha t qualifie d th e uni t a s a Clea n Unit , then , th e owne r o r operato r ma y generat e a credi t fo r th e differenc e -betwee n th e leve l tha t qualifie d th e uni t a s a Clea n Uni t and th e ne wemissions

llmiLj^'ita^atil'j^ , i f suc hreduction s ar e surplus , quantifiable , permanen t andwEetiS^^l^feiforceabltf^as— g piaiLica l mattci . J (9 ) Effec t o f rede3iqna£ion_o n ffi&jclaan Uni t s t ^usj^_JMu&-&i . Th e Clea n Uni t bu AI»Ua.deS^Jaaa^Asi

n o f a n emission s uni t i s no t affecte d b yredesignatio n o f th e attainmen t statu s o f the are a i n whic hi t i s located . Tha t is , i f a Clea n Uni t i s locate d i n a n attainmen t are a and th e are a i s redesignate d t o nonattainment , it s Clea n Uni t &Latuadiesaj-etna^-'t^

S i s no t affected . Similarly , redesignatio n fro mnonattainmen t t o attainmen t doe s ne t affec t tfjevClea n 44

9T0l£ ] ao-avH avaas n iSC ZTfr S 6T 6 XV

d0^9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP.1 8

NOU-"21-200 2 21:1 5 Y.V</<L3

Internal An

dDeliberativeDraft- D o no tquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute . 51.165 Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02 th e necessar ypermi t revision s (unles s th e uni t re-qualifie s a s a Clea n Uni t pursuan t t o paragrap h(d ) (3 ) (iv ) o f thi s section) . I f the owne r o r operato r begin s actua l constructio n on th e projec t withou t firs t applyin g t o revis e the . emission s unit' s permit , th e Clea n Uni t •a,taLu=>dies''i&B&fcjEoj

n end s immediatel yprio r t o th e tim e whe n actua l constructio n begins . (iv ) Aprojec t tha t cause s an emission s uni t t o los e it s srbatta^a^^aKaijIii B a s a Clea n Uni t i s subjec t t o th e applicabilit yrequirement s o f paragrap h(a ) (2 ) (ii ) (A ) throug h(D)/*of tni s sectio n a s i f th e emission s uni t wer e neve r a Clea n Unit . (3 ) Qualifyin g o r re-QualifyingJ:_ o us e th e Clea n Uni t applicabilit ytest . A n emission s uni t qualifie s a s a Clea n Uni t whe n th e uni t meet s th e criteri a belo wi n paragraph s (d)(3)(i ) through(iii ) o f thi s section . Afte r th e origina l Clea n Uni t a.LatuJ,ffl-ii'dlinat&qfi F expire s i n accordanc e wit hparagrap h(d)(6 ) o f thi s sectio n o r i s los t pursuan t t o paragrap h(d ) (2. ) (iii ) o f thi s section , suc h emission s uni t ma yre-qualif ya s a Clea n Uni t unde r eithe r paragrap h(d)(3)(iv ) below,•o r unde r th e Clea n Uni t provision s i n paragrap h(c ) o f thi s section . T o re-qualif y a s a Clea n Uni t unde r paragrap h(d)(3)(iv) r th e emission s uni t mus t obtai n a ne wpermi t issue d pursuan t t o th e 4 7

ZTOlg ] ao-avwavaas n i,SC ZT^ S 61 6 XV i 0 ^= 9 0 ZO/ZZ/ UP.1 9

NOU^21-200 2 21-1 5 H.1U/^ J

InternalandDeliberativeDraft- D o notquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute .

51.165 Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02 requirement s i n paragraph s (d ) ("? ) an d (B ) an d mee t al l th e criteri a belo wi n paragrap h(d)(3)(iv) . Th e reviewin g authorit ywil l mak e a separat e Clea n Uni t a.fruituad&£iLo^^fl5ff i fo r eac hpollutan t emitte d b yth e emission s uni t fo r whic h th e emission s uni t qualifie s a s a Clea n Unit . (i ) Qualifying

- ai r pollutio n contro l ^gctittftJ-aaieig r Ai r pollutan t emission s fro mth e emission s uni t mus t b e reduce d throug hth e us e o f -ait-air pollutio n contro l technolog y(whic hinclude s pollutio n preventio n a s define d unde r paragrap h(a ) (1 ) (xxvi) ) o r wor k practices ^ tha t meeti | bot hth e followin g requirementsr'f^^paffi£ra.fe^;•'HJ'flrJ&'f,:-li;£#-.ffi : . • i (A ) Th e owne r o r operato r ha s demonstrate d tha t th e emission s unit' s contro l technolog yi s comparabl e t o LAE R accordin g t o th e requirement s o f paragrap h(d)(4 ) o f thi s section . However , th e emission s uni t i s no t eligibl e fo r t-he-.Clea

n Uni t & ta t us.Etesl%ti^jft^t e i f it s emission s ar e no t reduce d belo wth e leve l o f a standard , uncontrolle d emission s uni t o f th e sam e typ e (e.g. , i f th e LAE R determination s t o whic hi t i s compare d hav e resulte d i n a determinatio n tha t n o contro l measure s ar e required) . (B ) Th e owne r o r operato r mad e a n investmen t t o instal l th e contro l technology . Fo r th e purpos e o f thi s determination , a n investmen t include s expense s t o researc h 

# (•4 "



# •fe

4 8

8T0I 3 ao-avjr avaas a iSC Z Tf S 6T 6 XVd01>:9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP.2 0

NDU--21-200 2 2 1 = I S P . 19/2 3

InternalandDeliberativeDraft- D o notquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute .

51.16 5 Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02 tha t th e contro l technologyi s achievin g a leve l o f emissio n contro l tha t i s comparabl e t o LAE R (e.g. , possibl yth e emission s unit' s capacit yo r throughput) , (iii ) Th e Clea n Uni t ma yno t emi t abov e a leve l tha t - ,. (iv ) Th e Clea n Uni t mus t compl ywit hanyterm s and condition s i n th e titl e V permi t relate d t o th e unit' s Clea n Uni t At a tus

i d"^s7i^a!fei.r6JK . (v ) Th e Clea n Uni t mus t continu e t o contro l emission s usin g th e specifi c ai r pollutio n contro l technologytha t wa s th e basi s fo r it s Clean Uni t statu•i^fe'i^ri&ifcon . I f th e emission s uni t o r contro l technologyi s replaced , the n th e Clea n Uni t statugd-gajiej^iiii'i ^ ends . (10 ) Qffaet s and Nettin g a t Clea n Units . Emission s change s tha t occu r a t a Clea n Uni t mus t no t b e include d i n calculatin g a significan t ne t emission s increas e (tha t is , mus t no t b e use d i n a "nettin g analysis") / o r b e use d fo r generatin g offset s unles s suc hus e occur s befor e th e effectiv e dat B o f pla n requirement s adopte d t o implemen t thi s paragrap h(d ) o r afte r th e Clean . Uni t s-fc*rtrus^.s^ona£-^on
expires ? or , unles s th e emission s uni t reduce s emission s belo wth e leve l tha t qualifie d th e uni t a s a Clea n Unit . However , i f th e clea n Uni t reduce s emission s belo wth e leve l tha t qualifie d th e uni t a s a Clea n Unit , the n th e owne r o r 

### S 7

6T0 ®ao-avw aVd 3 Sf lZSC

Z Tfr S 6T 6 XV iOf

* =9 0ZO/ZZ/T TP.2 1

NOY-21-200 2 21=1 6 P,20/2 3

Internalan dDeliberativeDraft- D o no tquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute .

51.16 5 AmendatoryLanguage11/19/02 operato r ma ygenerat e a credi t fo r th e differenc e betwee n th e leve l tha t qualifie d th e uni t a s a Clea n Uni t and th e emission s unit' s ne wpn.issic.ni. . liuilis^i^^it-eLri . i f suc h reduction s ar e surplus , quantifiable , permanent^an d

^enforceabl^a s a pi.autlca l uidlLfc.1 . (11 ) Effec t o f redesignatio n on.^'a^Clea n Uni t j,tatusd'ers^t^^^lbit . Th e Clea n unit ' statt«i^^^Q^^! i o f a n emission s uni t i s no t affecte d byredesignatio n o f th e attainmen t statu s o f th e are a i n whic hi t i s located . Tha t is , i f a clea n Uni t i s locate d i n an attainmen t are a and th e are a i s redesignate d t o nonattainment , it s Clea n Uni t stataag^^l'aii'a't|-oti

i i s no t affected . Similarly , redesignatio n fro mnonattainmen t t o attainmen t doe s no t affec t th e Clea n Uni t bLdLut.^'as'itiqrT^Ti'o'ri-- . However , i f a Clea nUnif s -ly^atL'tre^a^^ana^P ^ expire s o r i s los t pursuan t t o paragraph s (c ) (2 ) (iii ) an

d (d ) (2 ) (iii ) o f thi s section , i t mus t re qualif yunde r th e requirement s tha t ar e currentl y applicable . (e ) PC P exclusion_procedura l requirements . Bach'pla n shal l includ e provision s fo r PCP s equivalen t t o thos e containe d i n paragraph s (e)(1 ) through(6 ) o f thi s section . (1 ) Befor e an owne r o r operato r begin s actua l constructio n o f a PCP , th e owne r o r operato r mus t eithe r submi t a notic e t o th e reviewin g authorit yi f th e projec t i s 

### 5 S

ozoi a ao-avw a va a s n zsc z T^ S eie xv a JV-QOZO/ZZ/T TP.2 2

NOU-21-200 2 21 ! 1 6

Interna lan

d DeliberativeDraft

- Do no t quote , cite , copy , o r

distribute . 51.165 Amendator

y Languag e11/19/0

2 credi t fo r th edifferenc ebetwee nth elevel-o f reductio n whic hwa s use dt aqualif y fo r th ePC

Pexclusio nan dth enew Ptn i flftioM' lltftl^ : aiM'g^.fc^5n ! i f suc hreduction s ar esurplj^^ N quantifiable , permanent , an dfofffrra.1Ij&Ienforceable^aw—ar yiautina lmat.ter . / Gmj>_\_ (f ) Actual s PALs . Sfe^pla n shal l provid e fo r PAL s accordin g t o th e provision s i n paragraph s (f)(1 ) throug h (15 ) o f thi s section . (1 ) Applicability . (i ) Th e reviewing authorit yma yapprov e th e us e o f a n actual s PAL (PftL)"fo r anyexistin g majo r stationar ysourc e (excep t a s provide d i n paragrap h(f ) (1 ) (ii ) o f thi s section ) i f th e PAL meet s th e requirement s i n paragraph s (f ) (1 ) throug h(IS ) o f thi s section . Th e term^PAL " shal l mea n ^a'ctual s PAL " throughou t paragraph ' (f ) o f thi s section . (ii ) Th e reviewin g authorit yshal l no t allo wa n actual s PA L fo r •^^||ofe-. :-M^.-^feb'^;-[;an vmajo r stationar ysourc e locate d i n an extrem e ozon e nonattainmen t area . (iii ) Anyphysica l chang e i n o r chang e i n th e metho d o f operatio n o f a majo r stationarysourc e tha t maintain s 'it s tota l source-wid e emission s belo wth e PAL level , meet s th e requirement s i n paragraph s (f)(1 ) throug h(IS ) o £ thi s section , an d complie s wit hth e PAL permit : (A ) I s no t a majo r modificatio n fo r th e PAL pollutant ; 6 4

TZO ® Q0-QVH3 Vd 3 S Q iSCZ ~ T> S 6T6 XV d h: 9 0 "t^Z/UNOU-31-200 2 21:l ? p 2 2/2 3

Internalan dDeliberativeDraft- D o no tquote , cite , copy , o rdistribute .

51.16 5 Amendator

yLanguage11/19/02 designate d a s small , significan t o r majo r base d o n thei r potentia l t o emit . I n addition , th e owne r o r operato r o f th e sourc e shal l indicat e which , i f any , Federa l o r Stat e applicabl e requirements , amissioni , llmit s ^^n^-aakii'dniig' 1 o r warf c practice s appl yt o eac hunit . (ii ) Calculation s o f th e baselin e actua l emission s (wit hsupportin g documentation) . Baselin e actua l emission s ar e t o includ e emission s associate d no t onl ywit hoperatio n o f th e unit , bu t als o emission s associate d wit hstartup , shutdown and malfunction . (iii ) Th e calculatio n procedure s tha t th e majo r Stationar ysourc e owne r o r operato r propose s t o us e t o conver t th e monitorin g syste mdatavt p monthl yemission s and //^p^fJJffjAl

^ _ annua l emission s b'ft^dyjp^^ ^

m aa require d b

yparagrap h-(f)(13)(i ) o f thi s section . (4 ) Genera l requirement s fo r establishing,PALs . (i ) Th e pla n allow s th e reviewin g authorit yt o establis ha PAL a t a majo r stationarysource , provide d tha t a t a minimum , th e requirement s i n paragraph s (f ) (4 ) (i ) (A ) throug h(G ) o f thi s sectio n ar e met . (A ) Th e PAL shal l impos e an annua l emissio n limitatio n tjxpj.tfvbui

i i n ton s pe r yea.rj | tha t i s enforceabl e a s a practica l matter , fo r th e entir e majo r stationar ysource . Fo r eac hmont hduring th e PAL effectiv e perio d afte r th e 

### 6 9

zzo 

### ® ao-avjf avaas n iSC Z It' s 6T 6 XVd 1 ^ = 9 0 ZO/ZZ/T TP.2 4



### ' . LS K)

### L? l 

### L^®-- 21:1 7 

### P

- 23/2 3

Interna lan dDeliberativ

eDraft - Do no tquote, cite, copy, o

rdistribute. 51.16 5 Amendator

yLanguag

e11/19/0 2 monitorin g syste m

dat a t o monthly^mission s and annua l emission s ^rH^d^se^^o n ^iSSlT'ia^^^ ^ •iyat^'-ffi ^ a s require d byparagrap h(f ) (13 ) (i ) o f thi s section . (vii ) Arequiremen t tha t th e majo r stationar ysourc e owne r o r operato r monito r al l emission s unit s i n accordanc e wit hth e provision s an d prahibitiuna , unde r paragrap h(f ) (12 ) o f thi s section . (viii ) Arequiremen t t o retai n th e record s require d unde r paragrap h(f)(13 ) o f thi s sectio n o n site . Suc h record s ma yb e retaine d i n an electroni c format . (ix ) Arequiremen t t o submi t th e report s require d unde r paragrap h(f)(14 ) o f thi s sectio n byth e require d deadlines . (st ) Anyothe r requirement s tha t th e reviewin g . authorit ydeem s necessaryt o implemen t an d enforc e th e PAL . (8 ) PAL effectiv e perio d and reopenin g o f th e PAL permit . Th e pla n shal l requir e th e informatio n i n paragraph s (f ) (9 ) (i ) and (ii ) o f thi s section . (i J PAL effectiv e period . Th e reviewin g authorit y shal l specif ya PAL effectiv e perio d o f 1 0 years . (ii ) Reopening r .o l a£_r.h e PAL permit . (A ) Durin g th e PAL effectiv e period , th e pla n shal l requir e th e reviewin g authorit yt o reope n th e PAL permi t to : 74

TOTA LP.2 3

cso 

### ® ao-avwavaas nisc z TJ> S 

### ei e XV

JU 

### .96' " 1 U/zz/i

X