alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hamidreza REISI, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72989.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Hamidreza Reisi, Arlet, CA pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Leslie McKay, Anthony W. Norwood, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hamidreza Reisi, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for *195asylum and withholding of removal. We review for substantial evidence, *Singh v. INS,*340 F.3d 802, 806 (9th Cir.2003), and grant the petition for review and remand to the BIA for further proceedings.

Substantial evidence does not support the IJ’s adverse credibility finding. The IJ’s reasons for discounting the testimony of Reisi regarding his ability to attend church services, and ease of obtaining a visa were too speculative to constitute substantial evidence supporting an adverse credibility determination. *See Lopez-Reyes v. INS,*79 F.3d 908, 912 (9th Cir.1996) (reversing implausibility determination based on personal conjecture). The IJ also relied upon an inconsistency between Reisi’s testimony regarding his baptism and a document showing his affiliation with a church in Iran. These two documents do not disprove that he was practicing Christianity. *See Salaam v. INS,*229 F.3d 1234, 1238 (9th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (stating that an adverse credibility determination based on speculation and conjecture and without factual support in the record is reversible).

Because the IJ denied the asylum application based solely on an adverse credibility finding, we remand this matter to the BIA for further proceedings to determine whether, accepting Reisi’s testimony as credible, he is eligible for asylum and withholding of removal. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-17, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

I believe the IJ’s credibility determination is rational and .supported by substantial evidence. I would therefore deny the petition for review.
Stephen Dewayne PARKER v. STATE

CR-15-0602

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017 Reh. denied March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
K.C.B., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1008

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1181 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1181

 To ensure due process protections of individuals in the United States 
 against unlawful detention based solely on a protected characteristic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 2021

  Mr. Takano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure due process protections of individuals in the United States 
 against unlawful detention based solely on a protected characteristic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Korematsu-Takai Civil Liberties 
Protection Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST UNLAWFUL DETENTION.

    Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Prohibition on Detention Based on Protected 
Characteristics.--
            ``(1) In general.--No individual may be imprisoned or 
        otherwise detained based solely on an actual or perceived 
        protected characteristic of the individual.
            ``(2) Definition.--In this subsection, the term `protected 
        characteristic' includes each of the following:
                    ``(A) Race.
                    ``(B) Ethnicity.
                    ``(C) National origin.
                    ``(D) Religion.
                    ``(E) Sex.
                    ``(F) Gender identity.
                    ``(G) Sexual orientation.
                    ``(H) Disability.
                    ``(I) Any additional characteristic that the 
                Attorney General determines to be a protected 
                characteristic.
            ``(3) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this subsection 
        shall be construed to allow the Attorney General to remove a 
        characteristic described in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of 
        paragraph (2) from the definition of the term `protected 
        characteristic' under this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1014 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a pilot program 

to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to a veteran who has a traumatic 

brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2021 

Mr. MURPHY of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a 

pilot program to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to 

a veteran who has a traumatic brain injury or posttraumatic stress disorder. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans National 

5 Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1014 IH

1 SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM TO FURNISH HYPERBARIC OXY2 GEN THERAPY TO A VETERAN WITH TRAU3 MATIC BRAIN INJURY OR POST-TRAUMATIC 

4 STRESS DISORDER. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Veterans 

6 Affairs shall implement a pilot program to furnish HBOT 

7 to a veteran who has a traumatic brain injury or post8 traumatic stress disorder through a health care provider 

9 described in section 1703(c)(5) of title 38, United States 

10 Code. 

11 (b) LOCATIONS.—The Secretary shall select three 

12 Veterans Integrated Service Networks in which to operate 

13 the pilot program. 

14 (c) FUNDING.— 

15 (1) There is in the general fund of the Treasury 

16 a fund to be known as the ‘‘VA HBOT Fund’’ (in 

17 this Act referred to as the ‘‘Fund’’). 

18 (2) The sole source of monies for the Fund 

19 shall be donations received by the Secretary for ex20 press purposes of the Fund. 

21 (3) Amounts in the Fund shall be available to 

22 the Secretary without fiscal year limitation to pay 

23 for HBOT under subsection (a). 

24 (4) The Fund shall terminate on the termi25 nation date under subsection (d). 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1014 IH

1 (d) TERMINATION.—The pilot program shall termi2 nate on the day that is five years after the date of the 

3 enactment of this Act. 

4 (e) HBOT DEFINED.—In this Act, the term 

5 ‘‘HBOT’’ means hyperbaric oxygen therapy with a medical 

6 device— 

7 (1) approved by the Food and Drug Adminis8 tration; or 

9 (2) issued an investigational device exemption 

10 by the Food and Drug Administration. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
In the MATTER OF ANONYMOUS, a minor

2160382

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Lloyd KING, DOC #T45783, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3833

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                           STATER BROS. HOLDINGS INC.
                    CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)
          (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      13 Weeks Ended
                                                --------------------------
                                                 Dec. 26,        Dec. 24,
                                                   1999            2000
                                                ----------      ----------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>
Net income                                      $    1,852      $    1,822

Earnings per common share                       $    37.04      $    36.44
                                                ==========      ==========

Average common shares outstanding                   50,000          50,000
                                                ==========      ==========

Common shares outstanding at end of period          50,000          50,000
                                                ==========      ==========
</TABLE>


                                       18
NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU
1636 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON DC 20301-1636

DEC 0 1 2017

To All Members of the Army and Air National Guard

On December 13, 2017, we celebrate the 381st Birthday of the National
Guard. The National Guard has been serving and protecting our fellow citizens
since 1636. From “alert and muster” in 1637, to the creation of the
“Minuteman” in 1645 as our Nation’s first “rapid response force,” and through
every major conflict in our history, we have relied on, and continue to rely on,
the service of our National Guard.

This year marks the 100th Anniversary of U.S. entry into World War I.
The National Guard provided the bulk of the initial U.S. forces through the
summer of 1918, and was the vanguard of the American might that broke the
stalemate and turned the War in Allied favor. Over 100,000 Guardsmen were
killed or wounded. The war was also the birth of the National Guard in its
modern form; as a dual use force, indispensable both at home and overseas.

Today, the National Guard is an operational partner, integrated with the
active Army and Air Force, in meeting the sustained demands of our Nation’s
security and our local communities. Our soldiers and airmen actively serve at
home, and overseas. Since 9/11, Guard members have deployed over 850,000
times, and today we have, on average, over 30,000 Guardsmen mobilized
around the world in support of our warfighting commanders.

Although our Guard has evolved alongside our country, and our security
environment has changed, our organizing principle of part-time Citizen Soldier
and Airman remains constant as the core of our strength, and the foundation
of who we are. This generation’s Minutemen, as an indispensable Operational
Force, continue to defend our Nation, and respond in the community during
times of crisis. We will be Always Ready...Always There!

Happy Birthday, National Guard!

Sincerely,

os\ . el
Genbral, USS."Air Force
Chief, National Guard Bureau
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T TO D D BREW ER W EEK S, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. A L B E R T T U F O N O ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 15982 D . C . N o . 1 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 1 8 2 - H G - B MK ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f o rth e D is tr ic t o f

H aw a ii H e l e n G i l l m or , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T od d B re w erW ee ks, a H aw ai i st at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng w i th pr e j udi c e hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng du e proces s, re t al i at i on , and equ alprot ec t i on cl ai m s a gai nstst at e par ol e board o f f ic ia ls f o rd e n y in g h im p ar o le . W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . 

# FI LED JU L 25 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 15982 2 W e r e vi e w de novo adi s m i s s a l f orf a i l ur e t o s t a t e ac l a i m unde r28 U . S . C . §§ 1 9 1 5 A an d1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( ii) . R es ni ck v. H ayes , 21 3 F . 3d 44 3, 44 7 (9th C i r. 20 00 ); B arr e n v . H

arr i ngton , 1 5 2 F. 3 d1 1 9 3 , 1 1 9 4 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 8 ) ( o r d e r ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e da ll o f W e e k s ’s c la im s b e c au s e p ar o le b o a r do f f ic ia ls a r e e n title dto ab s o lu te q u a s i- ju d ic ia l im m u n ityf

o rd e c is io n s to

“ gr a nt , de ny , orr e voke par ol e , ” w hi c h ar e “ f unc t i ona l l yc om par abl e t o t a s ks perf orm ed by j ud ges. ” Sw ift v . Ca lifo rn ia , 384 F . 3d 1184, 1189 ( 9th C i r . 2004) ( c ita tio n an din te rn a l q u o ta tio n m ark s o m itte d ) . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y f ou nd thatW ee ks’ s c l ai m s w er e a l so barr ed b e c au s e th e yw e r e id e n tic a l to c la im s th a t h a db e e n d is m is s e dw ith p r e ju d ic e in a n o th e r§ 1 9 8 3 a c tio n . See Cato v. U ni ted States , 70 F . 3d 11 03 , 11 05 n. 2 (9th C i r. 1995) ( di s m i s s a l appr opr i a t e w he r e c om pl a i nt“ m e r e l yr e pe a t s pe ndi ng or previ ou sl y l i t i gat ed cl ai m s” (c i t at i on and i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed)) . W ee ks’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. A FFI R M ED .
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, A. Bradley Gabbard, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: August 16, 2004                    /s/  A. Bradley Gabbard
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         A. Bradley Gabbard
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF UROLOGIX FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDING
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         373,887
<SECURITIES>                                24,222,956
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,629,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                   220,494
<INVENTORY>                                    562,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,815,850
<PP&E>                                       5,332,024
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,382,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,838,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,584,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,521
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,137,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,838,252
<SALES>                                      6,158,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,158,270
<CGS>                                        3,478,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,478,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,246,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,466,978)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,466,978)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,466,978)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.48)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PowerSecure International, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  August 5, 2010
    /s/ Christopher T. HutterChristopher T. HutterExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, 
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
#### Hill v Kokosky,

No. 90550;

reported below: 186 Mich App 300.
[ARTICLE] 9
[MULTIPLIER] 1000
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               SEP-30-1997
[CASH]                                          59,625
[INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS]                               0
[FED-FUNDS-SOLD]                                     0
[TRADING-ASSETS]                                     0
[INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE]                    722,245
[INVESTMENTS-CARRYING]                          74,608
[INVESTMENTS-MARKET]                            75,904
[LOANS]                                      2,716,682
[ALLOWANCE]                                     26,458
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               3,716,954
[DEPOSITS]                                   2,968,626
[SHORT-TERM]                                   218,493
[LIABILITIES-OTHER]                            116,262
[LONG-TERM]                                     20,061
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           157
[OTHER-SE]                                     343,355
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY]               3,716,954
[INTEREST-LOAN]                                161,501
[INTEREST-INVEST]                               35,064
[INTEREST-OTHER]                                 1,005
[INTEREST-TOTAL]                               197,570
[INTEREST-DEPOSIT]                              91,907
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              96,567
[INTEREST-INCOME-NET]                          101,003
[LOAN-LOSSES]                                    5,400
[SECURITIES-GAINS]                                 274
[EXPENSE-OTHER]                                 61,134
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 44,524
[INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY]                      28,136
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    28,136
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                     2.03
[EPS-DILUTED]                                     2.02
[YIELD-ACTUAL]                                    3.99
[LOANS-NON]                                     23,808
[LOANS-PAST]                                     7,905
[LOANS-TROUBLED]                                     0
[LOANS-PROBLEM]                                      0
[ALLOWANCE-OPEN]                                24,114
[CHARGE-OFFS]                                    4,003
[RECOVERIES]                                       947
[ALLOWANCE-CLOSE]                               26,458
[ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC]                            21,963
[ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN]                                  0
[ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED]                          4,495
</TABLE>