alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Learn more at www.nationalguard.mil

Current as of August 2022 Point of Contact: NGB Public Affairs at (703) 607-2612

Key Characteristics:

• Each team is certified by the 

Secretary of Defense

• 57 Teams (one per State, territory and D.C. (CA, NY, FL each 

have two)

• On alert 24/7/365

• Sophisticated technical reachback system 

• Interoperable with First Responders 

• All WMD-CST personnel are 

HAZMAT TECH certified and receive over 650 hours of high-tech 

training 

• Interoperability with FBI, DOE, 

USSS and other Federal agencies

• Conducts Counter WMD activities at special events such as 

National Special Security Events 

(NSSEs), and events with a 

Special Event Assessment Rating 

(SEAR).

Overview: 

In accordance with 10 USC § 12310, the Adjutant General or Commanding 

General may employ the WMD-CST to support the State, Territory, or District 

of Columbia response under the direction of the governor to support state, 

local or Federal authorities. Each WMD-CST is comprised of 22 full-time, 

Title 32 Active Guard & Reserve (AGR), Army (ARNG) and Air National Guard 

(ANG) personnel. 

Mission:

Support civil authorities at a domestic incident site during specified events, 

which include the use or threatened use of a WMD; terrorist attack or threatened terrorist attack; intentional or unintentional release of nuclear, biological, 

radiological, or toxic or poisonous chemicals; natural or man-made disaster in 

the United States, Territory, or District of Columbia that result, or could result, 

in the catastrophic loss of life or property by identifying hazards, assessing 

current and projected consequences, advising on response measure, and 

assisting with the appropriate request for additional support.

Support Capabilities to the Incident Commander:

• Assessment and exploitation of potential/actual WMD sites

• A2LA accredited field-confirmatory mobile laboratory for rapid threat identification

• Laboratory reach-back support from national network definitive identification 

laboratories

• Robust communications interoperability (Secure/Unsecure)

• CBRN medical expertise (Physician Assistant and Medic on each WMDCST)

• CBRN hazard prediction plume modeling

• Technical support on-site or from remote locations

• Training assistance

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) 2020: The Year of the Guard 

Civil Support Team (CST)
Julio POWER and Olga Power, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee FOR RESIDENTIAL FUNDING MORTGAGE SECURITIES I, INC., MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-S7, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1088

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 19, 2018

Mark L. Pomeranz of Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., Hallandale, for appellants.

Steven J. Brotman and Michael P. De Simone of Locke Lord LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Justeene Blankenship, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of American Coal Corporation (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  October 10, 2003                                                 By: /s/ Justeene Blankenship

Justeene Blankenship

Chief Executive Officer





Chief Financial Officer
# Официален вестник C 134A/3 ма

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 134A |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 573 май 2014 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 134A

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 573 май 2014 г.

---

| Известие No | Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Поправки |
| 2014/C 134A/01 | Поправка на обявление за конкурс на общо основание — EPSO/AD/278/14 — Администратори (AD 7) в следните области: 1. Цифрова криминалистика 2. Оперативен анализ — (Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 88 A от 27 март 2014 г.) | 1 |

Известие No

Съдържание

Страница

Поправки

2014/C 134A/01

Поправка на обявление за конкурс на общо основание — EPSO/AD/278/14 — Администратори (AD 7) в следните области: 1. Цифрова криминалистика 2. Оперативен анализ — (Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 88 A от 27 март 2014 г.)

(Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 88 A от 27 март 2014 г.)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 134A/02 | Преглед на броевете на Официален вестник серия С А Конкурси | 2 |

2014/C 134A/02

Преглед на броевете на Официален вестник серия С А Конкурси

2

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

Поправки

| 3.5.2014 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2014

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 134/1

---

Поправка на обявление за конкурс на общо основание

EPSO/AD/278/14 — АДМИНИСТРАТОРИ (AD 7)

в следните области:

| 1. | ЦИФРОВА КРИМИНАЛИСТИКА |
| --- | --- |

1.

ЦИФРОВА КРИМИНАЛИСТИКА

| 2. | ОПЕРАТИВЕН АНАЛИЗ |
| --- | --- |

2.

ОПЕРАТИВЕН АНАЛИЗ

(Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
  C 88 A от 27 март 2014 г.
  )

2014/C 134 A/01

Страница 7, раздел VIII, точка 1

вместо:

Краен срок (включително за валидиране): 29 април 2014 г. в 12 ч. (на обяд), брюкселско време.

да се чете:

Краен срок (включително за валидиране): 6 май 2014 г. в 12 ч. (на обяд), брюкселско време.

---

3.5.2014

| 3.5.2014 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 134/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 134/2

---

ПРЕГЛЕД НА БРОЕВЕТЕ НА ОФИЦИАЛЕН ВЕСТНИК СЕРИЯ С А КОНКУРСИ

2014/C 134 A/02

По-долу е даден списък на броевете на Официален вестник от серия С А, публикувани през настоящата година.

Освен ако не е посочено друго, броевете на Официален вестник са публикувани на всички езици.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

---
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

Duke Marshall Marshall Unit 1-2

1 8/5/2010 8:09 8/5/2010

2 8/5/2010 9:40 8/5/2010

3 8/5/2010 11:13 8/5/2010

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date
Measured Value 

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used 

9:21 [<0.0594] Dry Method 26A

10:52 [<0.0619] Dry Method 26A

12:25 [<0.0604] Dry Method 26A

Method 26A

Method 26A

Method 26A

Test End Time

Chlorine Emission Test Results
Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments

BDL RL based on MDL[<0.00017] 13.3

BDL RL based on MDL[<0.00018] 13.3

BDL RL based on MDL[<0.00018] 13.7

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/mmBtu)

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

11.66 7.83 2,145,159 124.8

11.67 7.84 2,147,440 124.8

11.64 7.88 2,112,096 125

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)

Fuel #1
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #2 Fuel #3
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Other Supporting Information

Fuel #4
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certifications**
I, Martin A. Durant, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carmike Cinemas, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
March 16, 2005   /s/ Martin A. Durant   Martin A. Durant  Senior Vice President — Finance,  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers
Fringe Benefits Programs,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:18-cv-602
v. Judge Michael H. Watson
H&J Construction, Inc., Magistrate Judge Jolson
Defendant.
ORDER

The Boards of Trustees of Ohio’s Fringe Benefits Programs (“Plaintiffs”)
filed their Complaint on June 18, 2018. Compl., ECF No. 1. The summons for
H&J Construction, Inc. (“Defendant”) was returned executed on August 29, 2018.
ECF No. 4. Defendant failed to file a responsive pleading. Plaintiffs applied to
the Clerk for an entry of default, which the Clerk entered on August 31, 2018, in
accordance with Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Entry of
Default, ECF No. 6. Plaintiffs moved for default judgment on March 7, 2019, and
the time for filing a response passed. ECF No. 18.

Thereafter, on April 8, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R) recommending that Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for

default judgment be granted and judgment be entered against Defendant. R&R,

ECF No. 19.


Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiffs recover:
$19,599.00 from Defendant in unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated
damages, and interest for the period of October 2017 to July 2018; attorney's
fees in the amount of $6,160.00; interest from the time of judgment at the rate of
1% per month; and the costs of this action. R&R 1-2, ECF No. 19. The R&R
notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). /d. The R&R further advised the parties that the failure to
object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de
novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the decision of
the District Court adopting the R&R. /d. The deadline for filing such objections
has passed, and no objections were filed.

Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. The Clerk of Court

is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT against Defendant in accordance with this

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case No. 2:18-cv-602 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

All the companies
listed below are included in the companys consolidated financial statements. Except as otherwise indicated below, the Company has 100% direct or indirect ownership of, and ultimate voting control in, each of these companies. The list is as of
December 31, 2009 and excludes subsidiaries which are primarily inactive or taken singly, or as a group, do not constitute significant subsidiaries:



|                                   |  |                                    |  |                  
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|Subsidiary                         |  | State or Province of Incorporation |  | Percentage Owned 
|Unit Drilling Company              |  | Oklahoma                           |  | 100%             
|Unit Petroleum Company             |  | Oklahoma                           |  | 100%             
|Superior Pipeline Company, L.L.C.  |  | Oklahoma                           |  | 100%             
|Unit Texas Drilling Company L.L.C. |  | Oklahoma                           |  | 100% (indirectly)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman, President, and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)August 3, 2005/s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithSenior Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)August 3, 2005
D.J.J. v. J.D.B.

2160218

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Jefferson Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28 (D), Ala.R.Juv.P.
Exhibit 32.1








ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL


EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Oncologix Tech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Anthony Silverman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/  Anthony Silverman


Anthony Silverman


Chief Executive Officer and President




November 29, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2362

In re: D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION,

Debtor,

-----------------------------------

TOMISLAV MILIC,

Creditor - Appellant,

v.

KEVIN R. MCCARTHY, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Trustee - Appellee,

and

DEVELOPERS SURETY AND IDENMNITY COMPANY, Creditor; STEWART 

TITLE GUARANTY CO., Creditor, Transferee of Old Line Bank, Successor to 

The Washington Savings Bank, FSB,

Creditors,

and

D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION,

Debtor,

and

JUDY A. ROBBINS, 11,
2

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01076-TSE-IDD; 12-16730-

BFK)

Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tomislav Milic, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin R. McCarthy, MCCARTHY & WHITE, 

PLLC, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Tomislav Milic appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from 

the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for an expedited hearing on his objection 

to a sale that was previously approved by the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

courts below. Milic v. McCarthy, Nos. 1:16-cv-01076-TSE-IDD, 12-16730-BFK (E.D. 

Va. filed Oct. 27, 2016; entered Oct. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NUMBER 13-20-00470-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

THANH HUU NGUYEN AND 

ANH THI TRAM VO, Appellants,

v.

JOSHUA KESSLER AND 

JESSICA KESSLER Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Guadalupe County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria
2

This cause is before the Court on appellants’ voluntary motion to dismiss and 

appellees’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

1 Appellees assert the underlying trial 

court has not disposed of all pending parties and claims. 

In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review 

final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. Lehmann v. HarCon Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because there is no final judgment or order 

subject to appeal, the notice of appeal is premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 27.1(a).

Accordingly, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED 

FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

21st day of January, 2021. 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, pursuant to 

docket equalization order Misc. Docket No. 20-9117 issued by the Supreme Court of Texas.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                          Exhibit 21

                            Subsidiaries of BestNet Communications Corp.

                                     Subsidiaries of Registrant


                                         State of Incorporation      Percent of Ownership of BestNet
                                         ----------------------      -------------------------------
       Subsidiary                           or Jurisdiction               Communications Corp.
       ----------                           ---------------               --------------------
<S>                                               <C>                            <C>
Oncologix Corporation                             Nevada                         100%

International Environment Corporation            Delaware                        100%

Interpretel (Canada) Inc.                  Province of Ontario                   100%

Interpretel, Inc.                                 Arizona                        100%

Telplex International                             Arizona                        100%

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JODY LYNN MORRIS,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00249-CR

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D02665)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s third request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until November 27, 2015. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Genesis Stephens, Court Reporter for the 384th District Court, 

for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the above styled and numbered 

cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before November 27, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27

th day of October, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Case: 1:18-cv-00221-SJD Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/02/18 Page: 1 of 9  PAGEID #: 12

Case: 1:18-cv-00221-SJD Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/02/18 Page: 2 of 9  PAGEID #: 13

Case: 1:18-cv-00221-SJD Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/02/18 Page: 3 of 9  PAGEID #: 14

Case: 1:18-cv-00221-SJD Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/02/18 Page: 4 of 9  PAGEID #: 15

Case: 1:18-cv-00221-SJD Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/02/18 Page: 5 of 9  PAGEID #: 16

Case: 1:18-cv-00221-SJD Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/02/18 Page: 6 of 9  PAGEID #: 17

Case: 1:18-cv-00221-SJD Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/02/18 Page: 7 of 9  PAGEID #: 18

Case: 1:18-cv-00221-SJD Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/02/18 Page: 8 of 9  PAGEID #: 19

Case: 1:18-cv-00221-SJD Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/02/18 Page: 9 of 9  PAGEID #: 20