alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Kenneth Y. Tanji,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2007



/s/ Kenneth Y. TanjiName: Kenneth Y. TanjiTitle: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit B 

Case: 2:18-cv-00190-MHW-CMV Doc #: 76-2 Filed: 06/12/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 984
From: Vonderhaar, Douglas

To: Brian Murphy; Jonathan Misny

Cc: McClellan, Rand L.; Johnston, Katherine R.

Subject: Southard -- Settlement Communication

Date: Friday, February 7, 2020 4:31:17 PM

Attachments: image001.jpg

image002.jpg

image003.jpg

Charvat (Southard); Ltr to Plaintiff"s Counsel 2.7.2020.pdf

BH Data Aggregation (2.7.2020).xlsx

Brian & Jonathan:

Attached, please find correspondence concerning the sample data that Brian and Rand

discussed previously. We are preparing additional relevant information, which we expect to

send to you next week.

Best,

Doug

Doug Vonderhaar

Associate

200 Civic Center Drive | Suite 1200

Columbus, OH 43215-4138 

T +1.614.462.2634 

dvonderhaar@bakerlaw.com

bakerlaw.com

Case: 2:18-cv-00190-MHW-CMV Doc #: 76-2 Filed: 06/12/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 985
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with Amendment No. 1 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Sky One Medical, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stanley Hao, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  March
17, 2010




By:
                          /s/
      Stanley HaoName:  Stanley
      HaoTitle:  Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
ATTACHMENT D

Hourly Labor Costs Used in Estimating Respondent Burden Costs

Worker Category Raw Hourly 

Wage Rate a

Loaded Hourly 

Wage Rate b

Construction sector worker $20.36c$31.35 

Construction supervisor $29.46d$45.37 

Clerical worker $14.42e$22.21 

Brake and clutch repair mechanic $18.05f$27.80 

Brake and clutch repair supervisor $28.44g$43.80 

Industrial hygienist $35.50h$54.67 

Source:

a) BLS, 2009b, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2008 National Occupational Employment and Wage 

Estimates May, 2009. Occupations are the same as those used in the previous ICR.

b) EPA calculated the loaded hourly wage rate by inflating the raw hourly wage rate by 54 percent to account for 

benefits and overhead (EPA, 1992). In contrast to the wage rates, the total benefits figures for December 2008 in 

BLS, 2009a are for the State and local government sector. The data show that for State and local government 

workers the cost per hour worked figures for total compensation and wages and salary are $36.55 and $24.83, 

respectively. This would indicate that benefits represent a 37 percent increase over wages and salary. EPA has 

also used a figure of 17 percent to represent overhead. Combined, these result in the 54 percent figure used 

above. 

c) This is the mean hourly wage for the “Construction and Extraction Occupations (Major Group)” category, 

NAICS 47-0000, in BLS, 2009b. 

d) This is the mean hourly wage for the “First-Line Supervisors/Managers of Construction Trades and Extraction 

Workers” category, NAICS 49-1011, in BLS, 2009b. 

e) This is the mean hourly wage for the “Secretaries, Except Legal, Medical and Executive” category, NAICS 43-

6014, in BLS, 2009b. 

f) This is the mean hourly wage for the “Automotive Service Technicians and Mechanics” category, NAICS 49-

3023, in BLS, 2009b.

g) This is the mean hourly wage for the “First-Line Supervisors/Managers of Mechanics, Installers, and 

Repairers” category, NAICS 49-1011, in BLS, 2009b. 

h) Because there is no industrial hygienist category in BLS, 2009b, the mean hourly wage for the “Health and 

Safety Engineers, Except Mining Safety Engineers and Inspectors” category NAICS17-2111, in BLS, 2009b was 

used. This category was used based on the similarity of duties as described in the data. 
References for Attachment D

BLS 2009a, US Bureau of Labor Statistics Employer Costs for Employee Compensation

Historical Listings. September 2009 Available at

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/ocwc/ect/ececqrtn.pdf

BLS 2009b, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2008 National Occupational Employment and

Wage Estimates May, 2009. Available at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm

EPA, 1992, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. Office of Policy, Planning and 

Evaluation. Instructions for Preparing Information Collection Requests (ICRs). June 1.
exv10w46












Exhibit 10.46




HEALTH FITNESS CORPORATION

2009 Executive Bonus Plan



The Health Fitness Corporation Executive Bonus Plan for 2009 is designed to provide an annual
performance incentive for executive officers based on the achievement of certain financial
objectives. The financial objectives are set annually by the Board of Directors. Payments under the
bonus plan that are based on the achievement of financial objectives include the following
performance criteria: revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA).



Under this bonus
plan, the Chief Executive Officer may receive a bonus of between 1.8% and 67.5% of base salary, the
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, Chief Medical Officer and Chief Operations
Officer each may receive a bonus of between 1.2% and 45.0% of base salary, and other executive
officers may each receive a bonus of between 0.88% or 1.0% and 33.0% or 37.5% of base salary.
Except for the bonus payable to the Senior Vice President-Business and Corporate Development, the
level of bonus to be earned corresponds with the Company achieving between 80% and 120% of budgeted
revenue objectives, which constitutes 60% of the total bonus, and between 80% and 120% of budgeted
EBITDA objectives, which constitutes 40% of the total bonus, and no bonuses are earned if the
Company achieves less than 80% of the planned revenue targets or less than 80% of the planned
EBITDA targets. With respect to the bonus payable to the Senior Vice President-Business and
Corporate Development, the level of bonus to be earned corresponds with the Company achieving
between 80% and 120% of budgeted revenue objectives, which constitutes 50% of the total bonus, and
between 95% and 120% of new client annualized sales revenue, which constitutes 50% of the total
bonus. The total annual bonus payable to each executive officer is allocated as follows: 30%
based upon targets for January through June 2009; 30% based upon targets for July through December
2009; and 40% based upon targets for the full year. The Compensation Committee and Board of
Directors have the discretion to review the targets prior to July 1, 2009 and adjust the full year
targets and the targets for July through December 2009. The Board of Directors continues to have
the discretion to award discretionary bonuses.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 21, 2018

NO. 03

- 17

- 00299

- CR

Chano Casarez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUS TICES FIELD AND TOTH AFFIRMED IN PART; MODIF IED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED IN PART

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment s of conviction r en d ered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds that there w as no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment s for Counts II, III, and V. Therefore, the Court affirms the judgments for

Counts II, III, and V. However, there was error in the trial court’s judgment s for Counts I and IV

that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment s for Counts I

and IV to reflect that appellant pleaded guilty to those counts. The judgment s for those counts

,

as modified

, are affirmed

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no a djudication

of costs is made.
Shane Anthony LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2730

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 86 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 86

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Department of Justice 
 relating to ``Definition of `Frame or Receiver' and Identification of 
                              Firearms''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2022

 Mrs. McClain (for herself, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Biggs, Mr. 
 Bilirakis, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Budd, Mr. 
Carter of Georgia, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
 Gohmert, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Harris, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Hice of 
   Georgia, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Long, Mr. 
 McClintock, Mr. McKinley, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. 
   Mooney, Mr. Murphy of North Carolina, Mr. Norman, Mr. Perry, Mr. 
   Pfluger, Mr. Rosendale, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Steube, Mr. Thompson of 
   Pennsylvania, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Keller, Mr. Dunn, Mr. 
Fulcher, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mrs. Fischbach, and Mr. Babin) submitted 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Department of Justice 
 relating to ``Definition of `Frame or Receiver' and Identification of 
                              Firearms''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Justice relating to ``Definition of 
`Frame or Receiver' and Identification of Firearms'' (published at 87 
Fed. Reg. 24652 (April 26, 2022)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies
that, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | /s/GLENN J. RUFRANOGlenn J. Rufrano
Chief Executive Officer
March 4, 2004
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/JOHN B. ROCHEJohn B. Roche
Chief Financial Officer
March 4, 2004      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to New Plan Excel Realty
Trust, Inc. and will be retained by New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
EX PARTE Whitney Phillips BROOKS

(In re: Lloyd Michael Brooks v. Whitney Phillips Brooks)

2160312

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1066 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to provide flexibility with the cost 

share for fire management assistance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1066 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wildfire Recovery 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE COST SHARE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 420 of the Robert T. 

6 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub9 section (f); and 

10 (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(e) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of assist13 ance under this section shall be not less than 75 percent 

14 of the eligible cost of such assistance.’’. 

15 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub16 section (a) shall only apply to amounts appropriated on 

17 or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

18 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

19 Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment 

20 of this Act, the President, acting through the Adminis21 trator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 

22 shall conduct and complete a rulemaking to provide cri23 teria for the circumstances under which the Administrator 

24 may recommend the President increase the Federal cost 

25 share for section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

26 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5187). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1066 RDS

1 Such criteria shall include a threshold metric that assesses 

2 the financial impact to a State or local government from 

3 responding to a fire for which fire management assistance 

4 is being provided. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
. 

What is “Vigilant Guard”? 

It’s a three-day, Tennessee National Guard-hosted exercise that will test 

the National Guard as the first military responder in support of the 

governor and the state emergency management agency. “Vigilant Guard” 

reinforces that all incidents are local. The exercise will demonstrate the 

capabilities of the Tennessee National Guard Joint Force Headquarters, 

the Joint Task Force-Tennessee, and the Emergency Management 

Assistance Compact (EMAC) – the process where Governors reach out 

to other Governors for more assistance. Specific National Guard 

homeland defense capabilities will include the National Guard Reaction 

Forces (NGRF), Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Teams 

(CST) and Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Enhanced 

Response Package (CERFP) teams. 

What is the exercise scenario? 

On April 19 at approximately 10 a.m. a 7.7-scale earthquake will register 

at New Madrid Seismic Zone in Shelby County. The earthquake will be 

centered in the vicinity of Marked Tree, Ark. The incident will prompt 

the deployment of National Guard personnel from Tennessee, Alabama, 

Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, and the National 

Guard Bureau. 

Who will participate? 

More than 2,000 National Guard personnel from Tennessee and 

surrounding states will respond in support of relief operations in Shelby 

County – all under the command and control of the Governor of 

Tennessee through EMAC. These National Guard forces will operate and 

train alongside other participants including Shelby County and state 

agencies, the Department of Homeland Security, and Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) Region IV. 

Tennessee 

National Guard Response 

Exercise: April 21-23, 2008 

Earthquake incident in Shelby 

County resulting in: 

• Casualties 

• Infrastructure damage 

• Evacuations/displaced persons 

Participants: 

• Tennessee National Guard 

• Alabama National Guard 

• Arkansas National Guard 

• Illinois National Guard 

• Kentucky National Guard 

• Mississippi National Guard 

• Missouri National Guard 

Coordinating organizations: 

• Shelby County 

• National Guard Bureau 

• U.S. Northern Command 

• Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) 

Helpful Terms: 

Civil Support Team (CST) 

Assesses hazards, advises civil 

authorities, and facilitates military 

support during emergencies and 

incidents of mass destruction. 

Chemical, Biological, Radiological 

and Nuclear Enhanced Response 

Force Package (CERFP) 

Responding to chemical, biological, 

radiological, nuclear, and high-yield 

explosives incidents, the CERFP 

provides security, decontamination, 

medical support and casualty search

and extraction. 

National Guard Reaction 

Force (NGRF) 

As the critical first line of 

defense in counter-terrorism, 

the NGRF supports civil 

authorities, provides site 

security and controls civil 

disturbances. It also protects 

critical DoD infrastructure. 

Learn more: http://www.ngb.army.mil

For more information contact NGB Public Affairs (Media Desk) 703-607-2584 Current as of March 11, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          66,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,073,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   468,000
<INVENTORY>                                    777,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,799,000
<PP&E>                                       1,031,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 712,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,270,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,584,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,000
<COMMON>                                    19,809,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,270,000
<SALES>                                      1,356,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,356,000
<CGS>                                          672,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,949,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,625,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,625,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Forms S-8 (No. 33-13723 and 33-48011) pertaining to the stock option plan of
Carmike Cinemas, Inc. and Form S-8 (No. 333-53329) pertaining to Carmike
Cinemas, Inc.'s 1998 Class A Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 25,
1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Carmike Cinemas, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K), for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                     /s/      Ernst & Young LLP



Columbus, Georgia
March 22, 1999
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SERGIO V. BENCOMO, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5122

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 27, 2018. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 

from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough 

County; Chet A. Tharpe, Judge.

Patrick B. Calcutt of Calcutt & Calcutt P.A., 

Americus, Georgia, and Dana A. 

Friedlander, Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Linsey Sims-Bohnenstiehl, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Retention Bonus Letter - Michael L. Kranda



 Exhibit 10.83 
 

 
 Delivered in Person 
 February 25, 2009 
 Michael Kranda 
 Dear
Michael: 
 As you know, given the macro economic climate and resulting impact on company operations, many corporations have scaled back and
even eliminated 2008 bonus programs as was the decision by Anesiva’s Board of Directors. However, in recognition of the continued commitment of its people to the success of the company, the Board has adopted a retention bonus plan for 2009.
Anesiva, Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to offer you an initial bonus payment in the amount equal to Sixty-six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-seven Dollars ($66,667.00) to be earned and payable on March 1, 2009. Additional stay bonuses
are planned for May and June under similar terms subject to subsequent Board approval. 
 In the event that you voluntarily resign from
employment with the Company before May 1, 2009, you agree that you will repay to the Company this retention bonus amount paid to you pursuant to this letter. Any repayment under this paragraph must be repaid within thirty (30) days
following your last date of employment with the Company. In the event that you are involuntarily terminated from employment with the Company, you will not be liable for repayment of the retention bonus. 
 As a reminder, your employment with the Company continues to be “at will,” as described in your original Offer Letter. This retention bonus and
letter does not change any other terms of your Offer Letter. 
 We hope that you find the foregoing terms acceptable. Please indicate your
agreement with these terms by signing and dating below. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ John Tran
	John Tran
	Vice President, Finance


 I have read, accept and agree to, the terms of this agreement. 
  

					
	/s/ Michael L. Kranda	 		 	2/25/2009
	Name	 		 	Date

 HEADQUARTERS: 
 650 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 • PHONE (650) 624-9600 • FAX (650) 624-7540 
 WWW.ANESIVA.COM