alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-46715, 33-50610, 33-50608, 33-50607, 333-01409, 333-31371, and
333-31369) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Employee Stock
Option Plan of Informix Corporation of our report dated February 3, 1997, except
for paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 12 (as to which date is November 16, 1997) with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Informix
Corporation, as restated, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the
year ended December 31, 1996.
 
San Jose, California                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
November 16, 1997
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paracelsian, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Acting Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 17, 2003

                                             By:  /s/ Thomas D. Livingston
                                                --------------------------------
                                                   Thomas D. Livingston
                                                   Acting Principal Financial
                                                   Officer
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 44 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding 

health care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2021 

Ms. MCCOLLUM (for herself, Mr. POCAN, Ms. JAYAPAL, and Ms. OMAR) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States regarding health care. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 44 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Health care, including care to prevent 

3 and treat illness, is the right of the people and necessary 

4 to ensure the strength of the Nation. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en6 force and implement this article by appropriate legisla7 tion.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>
               
<ARTICLE>               5
                                
<S>                                        <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     268,583
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              533,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           878,149
<PP&E>                                  23,653,131
<DEPRECIATION>                          15,467,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          11,860,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    1,808,586
<BONDS>                                  1,141,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 2,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                               8,055,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            11,860,054
<SALES>                                  3,661,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         4,027,653
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,073,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           309,785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         145,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,256,381
<INCOME-TAX>                               314,718
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        941,663
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               941,663
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                10.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                10.52
        
                            

</TABLE>
Randall L. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-617

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Learn more at www.nationalguard.mil

Current as of August 2022 Point of Contact: NGB Public Affairs at (703) 607-2612

JLT Capabilities:

• Enhances existing information 

 exchange between the States

 Inter-agency partners, and NGB

• Assists with the collection, report- 

 ing and sharing of information to 

 the NGB-JOC

• Assists in the coordination of 

 requests for information (RFIs

 and requests for assistance

 (RFAs) between JFHQs-State and

 NGB

JLT Tailored Response:

• State requests a NGB JLT to assist 

 with small or large events, requir-

 ing a wide range of ARNG and 

 ANG expertise

• JLT composition of personnel and 

 equipment can be tailored to the

 State’s request

JLT Equipment:

• Laptops with wireless internet

• Satellite Communications

• IRIDUM Phones

JLT does not:

• Provide augmentation or sustain-

 ment support for JFHQs-State, 

 Joint Task Force, or staffing due to 

 readiness shortfalls

• Provide evaluation of Defense Sup

 port to Civil Authority (DSCA) func-

 tions (i.e. Joint Reception, Stag

 ing, Onward Movement, and Inte

 gration (JRSOI))

• Supplement State JOC White Cells

National Guard Bureau

Joint Liaison Team (JLT)

Mission: 

Under the direction of the CNGB, the JLT provides shared situational awareness (SSA) and liaison support between the NGB and supported National 

Guard (NG) Joint Force Headquarters-State (JFHQs-State) and inter-organizational partners during domestic operations (DOMOPS) including homeland 

defense (HD), defense support of civil authorities (DSCA), National Special 

Security Events (NSSEs), and national exercises.

As a crisis or training event develops, NGB and State leaders coordinate response actions and determine if JLT support is required. The JLTs will initiate 

movement within 24 hours of decision and deploy with mission critical communications equipment. The JLT and communications suite will not impose a 

burden on the State’s Joint Operations Center (JOC).

NGB staffs ten, four-person, JLTs capable of sustaining 24hr operations. 

Composition of JLTs can be tailored to include elements for Personnel (J1), 

Intelligence (J2), Operations (J3), Logistics (J4), Communications (J6), Public Affairs, ANG and ARNG.

NGB JLT support to recent natural disasters, major exercises, and National 

Special Security Events:

• Jan 2022 – Operational Support, DCNG

• Aug 2021 – Hurricane IDA, LANG, PRNG, VING

• Aug 2021 – Wildfire Operations, NIFC

• Jun 2021 – Artic Eagle, AKNG

• Apr 2021 – Civil Disturbance, MNNG

• Jan 2021 – Civil Disturbance, DCNG

Highlights

Providing requested support to states during crisis
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

National Logistics Service, LLC,
Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 1:18c¢v573
(Consent Case ; Litkovitz, M.J.)
Westcoast Transportation, Inc.,
Defendant(s).

ORDER
Pursuant to notification that this matter has been settled between the parties:

It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice,
provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within thirty (30)
days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may
substitute a more particularized Order of Dismissal within this same time frame,
should they so desire.

The Court retains jurisdiction over the settlement agreement for the purpose
of its enforcement.

Date_5, ileun < cethowd
wal May 28, 2019 KAREN L. LITKOVITZ

United States Magistrate Judge
#### Hughes Company *v.*Callahan.

Opinion delivered May 5, 1930.

*735
      *Feasel d Steel,*for appellant.

*McConnell d Jackson,*for appellee.

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellants contend that the court erred in subrogating appellee to the rights of the holder of the mortgage upon its payment by him at the request of the mortgagor, because of his accepting a release of the mortgage instead of taking an assignment thereof.

The undisputed testimony shows that he furnished the money to pay off the mortgage at the request and for the benefit of the mortgagor upon his assurance that there were no other liens or incumbrances against the land, and that his advances and payment should be secured by a first lien thereon. He was not merely a volunteer therefore in the payment of the mortgage debt, the loan having been negotiated by the mortgage debtor for *736the express purpose of paying it. *So. Cot. Oil Co.*v. *Hill Cot. Co.,*108 Ark. 555; *Stephenson*v. *Grant,*168 Ark. 927; *Rodman*v. *Sanders,*44 Ark. 514; and 37 Cyc. p. 365, note p. 473.

It is true that he might have discovered appellant's execution deed by examination of the record, but he was not culpably negligent in failing to do' so on account of the assurances given by the mortgagor; and if it had been discovered, his rights could have been protected as completely in making the loan as was intended should be done by requiring the transfer or assignment of the mortgage to him upon his payment of the mortgage debt upon the request of the mortgagor. The rights of the purchaser under the execution deed are not prejudiced by the decree allowing a subrogation of appellee to the rights of Scho'backer, the holder of the mortgage, since as against the lien of such mortgage appellant’s claim was without merit and subject thereto.

The court did not err therefore in decreeing a sub-rogation of appellee to the lien and rights of the holder of the mortgage, and a foreclosure thereof for satisfaction for the money advanced to pay off the mortgage indebtedness and the decree must be affirmed. It is so ordered.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE MATTER OF THE CASE NO. 3:18MJ167-SLO

SEARCH OF:

3908 Nicholas Road

Dayton, Ohio 45417

______________________________________________________________

MOTION TO SEAL SEARCH WARRANT, APPLICATION, SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT 

AND RETURN

______________________________________________________________

Now comes the United States Attorney and moves this Court, pursuant to Rule 16(d)(1) of 

the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Court's inherent power to control papers filed 

with the Court, for a protective order sealing the Search Warrant, Application, Supporting 

Affidavit and Return until July 31, 2022.

In support of this Motion, the United States Attorney states:

1. An Order was issued on March 20, 2018.

2. That there is no Indictment or Information pending before any United States 

District Court which necessitates the disclosure of the Supporting Affidavit at this time. 

3. Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure the proper time for 

moving to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to the search warrant is subsequent to the filing of 

an Indictment or Information and Arraignment thereon. Therefore, no prejudice would be caused 

to any defendant or potential defendant by the granting of this motion.

4. That the disclosure of certain information and statements contained in said 

documents would hamper an ongoing criminal investigation.

Case: 3:18-mj-00167-SLO Doc #: 18 Filed: 01/03/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 100
2

WHEREFORE, the United States of America respectfully requests that the Search Warrant, 

Application, Supporting Affidavit and Return be sealed and kept from public inspection until July 

31, 2022.

Respectfully submitted,

KENNETH L. PARKER

United States Attorney

s/Brent G. Tabacchi

BRENT G. TABACCHI (IL 6276029)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

200 West Second Street, Suite 600

Dayton, Ohio 45402

Office: (937) 225-2910

Fax: (937) 225-2564

E-mail: Brent.Tabacchi@usdoj.gov

Case: 3:18-mj-00167-SLO Doc #: 18 Filed: 01/03/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 101
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 6, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
Leon Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Leon Moore
-----------------------
Leon Moore
Chief Executive Officer
April 8, 2003


<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 6, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
Bob Marlowe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/  Bob Marlowe
-----------------------
Bob Marlowe
Chief Financial Officer
April 8, 2003
M.B. v. WE.B. and Wa.B.

2160010

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 17, 2017 Reh. denied March 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Alberto R. Santa Ines, Chief Financial Officer of Abaxis, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the Report.





Dated: February 9, 2011





By: /s/ Alberto R. Santa InesAlberto R. Santa InesChief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance





This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  The certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Abaxis, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in any such filing.
Case: 2:18-mj-00630-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 1 of 7  PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:18-mj-00630-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 2 of 7  PAGEID #: 2

Case: 2:18-mj-00630-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 3 of 7  PAGEID #: 3

Case: 2:18-mj-00630-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 4 of 7  PAGEID #: 4

Case: 2:18-mj-00630-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 5 of 7  PAGEID #: 5

Case: 2:18-mj-00630-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 6 of 7  PAGEID #: 6

Case: 2:18-mj-00630-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 7 of 7  PAGEID #: 7
EXHIBIT ACase: 2:18-cv-00894-EAS-CMV Doc #: 69-1 Filed: 07/31/19 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: 893

Case: 2:18-cv-00894-EAS-CMV Doc #: 69-1 Filed: 07/31/19 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: 894

Case: 2:18-cv-00894-EAS-CMV Doc #: 69-1 Filed: 07/31/19 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: 895

Case: 2:18-cv-00894-EAS-CMV Doc #: 69-1 Filed: 07/31/19 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: 896

Case: 2:18-cv-00894-EAS-CMV Doc #: 69-1 Filed: 07/31/19 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: 897

Case: 2:18-cv-00894-EAS-CMV Doc #: 69-1 Filed: 07/31/19 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: 898
Extension of Executive Employment Agreement, Richard Shea



 Exhibit 10.27 
 EXECUTION COPY 
 EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Extension”) is made as of February 28, 2009 by and between Atlantic Broadband Management, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and Richard Shea (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered an
Executive Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) which will expire on February 28, 2009; 
 WHEREAS the Company and
Executive desire to enter into a new employment agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to extend the terms of the Agreement on an interim
basis for a period of six months to allow parties sufficient time to enter a new agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 Section 1. Extension of Employment Period The Employment Period shall be extended for a period of six months, beginning on the date of this Extension, unless terminated earlier under the provisions of Section 5
(a) (ii) – (iii) or by execution of a new employment agreement by Company and Executive. The term “fifth anniversary” is amended to read “fifth anniversary plus six months” wherever it appears in the
Agreement. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unamended. 
 Section 2. Retroactive Effect The terms and consideration as agreed to
by Company and Executive in a new employment agreement to be entered into following the date hereof shall apply retroactively to March 1, 2009. 
 Section 3. Capitalized Terms Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement. 
 Section 4.
Governing Law. Issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Extension will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any
choice of law or conflict of law rules or provisions (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware. In furtherance of the foregoing, the
internal law of the State of Delaware will control the interpretation and construction of this Extension, even though under Delaware’s choice of law or conflict of law analysis, the substantive law of some other jurisdiction would ordinarily
apply. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension of Executive Employment Agreement as of the date
first written above. 
  

			
	ATLANTIC BROADBAND MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	
	
	  

	Richard Shea
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         103,308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  519,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                   103,723
<INVENTORY>                                     30,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               698,824
<PP&E>                                       1,213,136
<DEPRECIATION>                                 321,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,595,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,736,263
<BONDS>                                        822,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           737
<OTHER-SE>                                   (128,958)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,595,661
<SALES>                                      1,774,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,774,525
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,158,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (523,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (523,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (523,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (7.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.13)


</TABLE>
From : Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Sent : 06/13/2012 10:00 AM

To : "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

, Keith

Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc :

Subject : Fw: demo analysis

Courtney

Your new comment number 18 asks where the analysis is. We did NOT redo this analysis since we did

NOT expect these statistics to change. I believe this was your comment/question.

Sharon V. Nizich

Minerals and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS

- US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541

- 2825