alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, C. Steven Guenthner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Almost Family, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
        to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
        including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
        within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
        report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
        of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
        over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
        recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
        likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
        financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
    most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
    registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        controls over financial reporting.

     Date:   March 31, 2006

BY  /s/ C. Steven Guenthner
        --------------------
        C. Steven Guenthner
        Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 26, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00569

- CV

Mark Louis Nelson, Appellant

v.

Crystal Dawn Stark

- Nelson, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on June 11, 2014. Appellant has

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal

. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to thi s appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

:

Plaintiff,

:

vs. Case No. 3:18cr112

:

JIMMY WEBB, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

:

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

BOND (DOC.#61); RIGHT OF APPEAL EXPLAINED 

Defendant is on probation with this Court, a status that began on April 3, 2019. 

Pursuant to the discussions and reasoning set forth by the Court, during conference calls 

held on April 7 and April 9, 2020, both calls upon the record, this Court OVERRULES the 

Defendant’s Motion for Bond (Doc. #61), concluding, by the requisite degree of proof, that there 

exists no condition or combination of conditions such as to guarantee the appearance of the 

Defendant when required and/or the safety of any other person and the community.

In ruling as aforesaid, this Court notes that, since Defendant was placed on probation on 

April 3, 2019, his probationary period has been marked by numerous violations and increasingly 

bizarre, unpredictable and dangerous conduct. Admittedly, these are allegations only and have 

not been proven in a court of law. 

Defendant is currently under Indictment in the Montgomery County Common Pleas 

Court on charges which, if adjudicated against him, represent a new level of erratic and 

Case: 3:18-cr-00112-WHR Doc #: 63 Filed: 04/28/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 179
2

dangerous activities. At this juncture, however, suffice it to say that a duly impaneled grand jury 

has found probable cause to believe that Mr. Webb has committed the offenses for which he has 

been indicted. 

This Court had secured a psychological evaluation of the Defendant and was preparing to 

refer him for intensive mental health counseling, when the Coronavirus put a delay on those 

plans. Accordingly, this Court feels that the Defendant, at this time, represents a danger to 

himself and others in the community, which could well jeopardize his appearing in Court when 

required.

Defendant, to whom a copy of this Entry is sent, is advised that he has fourteen days from 

the filing of this Decision and Entry to appeal this Court’s decision rendered herein to a higher 

court. He is entitled to the services of an attorney to aid him in such an appeal. Should he wish to 

appeal and desires an attorney to represent him, the Court will appoint an attorney for him, at no 

cost, to assist him in such an appeal. 

________________________________________

April 24, 2020 WALTER H. RICE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Jimmy Webb, c/o Montgomery County Jail, 330 W. 2nd Street, Dayton., OH 45422

Case: 3:18-cr-00112-WHR Doc #: 63 Filed: 04/28/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 180
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2005:



| | (1) | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/S/    MICHAEL V.
BARTON                             
|Michael V. Barton Chief Executive Officer & President

March 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Odyssey Marine
Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                   January 10, 1996




Mr. Alan B. Miller
President
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
367 South Gulph Road
King of Prussia, PA  19406

Dear Alan:

     The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust at their
December 1, 1995, meeting authorized the renewal of the current Advisory
Agreement between the Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. ("Agreement") upon the
same terms and conditions.

     This letter constitutes the Trust's offer to renew the Agreement until
December 31, 1996, upon the same terms and conditions. Please acknowledge UHS of
Delaware, Inc.'s acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below
and returning one copy of this letter to me.

                                       Sincerely yours,
                         
                                       /s/ Kirk E. Gorman 
                                       ------------------------------ 
                                       Kirk E. Gorman
                                       President and Secretary
               
KEG/jds

cc: Warren J. Nimetz, Esquire
    Charles Boyle


Agreed to and Accepted:

UHS of Delaware, Inc.




By:  /s/ Alan B. Miller
    -------------------------
    Alan B. Miller, President
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 6, 2010
    /s/  Christopher T. HutterChristopher T. HutterExecutive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Nonqualified Stock Option Plan of Pioneer Financial Services,
Inc. (Form S-8 No. 33-37305), the Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. Employee
Savings and Stock Ownership Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-45894), and the National
Benefit Plans, Inc. 1992 Agent Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-53686) of
our report dated March 8, 1996, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.



                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 8, 1996
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2004:



(1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Odyssey Marine
Exploration, Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Holmes  
|Michael J. Holmes      
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 23, 2005         



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
<PAGE>

FRONTIER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.           1997 FORM 10-K               EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-30217, No. 33-39638, and No. 33-77332) pertaining to the
Incentive and Non-Incentive Stock Option Plans of Frontier Insurance Group, Inc.
of our report dated March 24, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Frontier Insurance Group, Inc. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                /S/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                ------------------------------

New York, New York
March 24, 1998


<PAGE>
#### Berger *v.*Lutterloh.

Opinion delivered February 9, 1901.

Tax Sale — Void Levy. — A sale of land for nonpayment of taxes is void where the levying court which levied the county taxes convened on the third, instead of the first, Monday in October.

*Hillard*v. *Bunker,*68 Ark. 340, followed.

Appeal from Craighead Circuit Court.

Felix G. Taylor, Judge.

*J. C.*Hawthorne, for appellant.

*N. F.*Lamb, for appellee.

RiddicK, J.

This is an action of ejectment, in which the plaintiff bases his right to recover upon a sale of the land in controversy for nonpayment of taxes and deed executed to him as a purchaser at such sale. The circuit court declared the deed void, for the reason, among others, that it was not based on a valid levy of taxes. The levying court, composed of the county judge and justices of the peace, levied the taxes for the nonpayment of which the land was sold on the third Monday in October, whereas the first Monday of that month is the day fixed by law for the convening of the levying court. *Hilliard v.*Bunker, 68 Ark. 340, 58 S. W. 362.

But counsel for appellant contends that there is nothing to show that the court did not meet on the day provided by law and adjourn to the third Monday of the month, the day on which the taxes were levied. We have examined the opening order of the court and the order levying the taxes, and we think they show *577affirmatively that the court was not holding an adjourned term, but that it convened in the first instance on the third Monday in October, the day on which the taxes were levied. The court not having met on the clay fixed by law, the levy was invalid. *Hilliard*v. Bunker, 68 Ark. 340, 58 S. W. 362.

It results that, in our opinion, the judgment of the circuit court holding the tax sale and deed void was correct, and it is therefore affirmed.
## E x a m p l e o f a P r e f l i g h t C h e c k l i s t

S T A T U S C H E C K

● O p e r a t i o n s w i t h i n 5 m i l e s / 8 k m o f a n a i r p o r t C A L L A I R P O R T C O N T R O L T O W E R F O R P E R M I S S I O N

● A r e a P o p u l a t i o n A V O I D F L Y I N G I F A R E A I S P O P U L A T E D

● I l l u m i n a t i o n o f A r e a I F T H E S U N G O E S D O W N

, D O N O T F L Y

● O w n e r s h i p o f A r e a F l o w n P E R M I S S I O N G R A N T E D T O F L Y B Y L A N D O W N E R

● D a m a g e t o U A V N O N E

● F a s t e n e r s I N S T A L L E D A N D T O R Q U E D

● M o t o r C

­ c l i p s I N S T A L L E D A N D S E C U R E

● C a m e r a S E C U R E

, B A T T E R Y C H A R G E D A N D I N S T A L L E D

● M e m o r y d e v i c e ( S D c a r d o r f l a s h d r i v e ) E M P T Y

, L O C K E D ( I F R E Q ’ D ) A N D I N S T A L L E D

● U A V b a t t e r y I N S T A L L

● T e l e m e t r y c o n n e c t i o n C H E C K

● R / C t r a n s m i t t e r C H A R G E D ( E x

. 1 0

. 4 M I N I M U M )

● R / C c o n t r o l P A I R E D

● F i e l d K i t E N S U R E C O M P L E T E ( T O O L S

, S D C A R D S

, E T C )



### P R E F L I G H T C H E C K L I S T

E N V I R O N M E N T :

● T a k e o f f z o n e * * I D E N T I F Y

● O b s t a c l e s * * A C K N O W L E D G E

● D i t c h / a l t e r n a t e l a n d i n g a r e a I D E N T I F Y

● W i n d N O T E D I R E C T I O N A N D S P E E D (

_ _ M P H /

_ _ K P H M A X )

N o t e : T / O & l a n d w i t h w i n d t o p i l o t ’ s b a c k i f p o s s i b l e

● P r e c i p i t a t i o n ( U A V d e p e n d a n t )



### U A V

, T R A N S M I T T E R

, & D R U :

● U A V a n d P r o p s N O D A M A G E / / T O R Q U E D

● T r a n s m i t t e r O N ( E x

. 1 0

. 4 M I N V O L T S M I N )

● U A V B a t t e r y S E C U R E ( C H E C K M A N U A L F O R M I N )

● C o m p u t e r

/ T a b l e t B a t t e r y 2 5 % M I N

● T e l e m e t r y C O N N E C T E D

, 9 5 % M I N

● M i s s i o n L O A D E D

o R o u t e & W a y p o i n t s V E R I F I E D ( K M < m a x d i s t a n c e f o r b a t t v o l t s )

o A l t i t u d e < ( U A V s p e c i f i c ) V E R I F I E D

● G P S & M a s t O r i e n t a t i o n N O A B N O R M A L I T I E S I N M A S T A N D C O M P A S S

● G P S s a t e l l i t e s * * M I N I M U M O F 7

● G P S p o s i t i o n * * N O D R I F T



### T A K E O F F :

● A r e a * * C L E A R

● U A V “ A R M E D ”

● T r a n s m i t t e r S w i t c h e s V E R I F I E D I N S T A B I L I Z E

● T a k e o f f a n d c l i m b “ T A K I N G O F F ”

● S e l e c t L o i t e r m o d e U A V S T A B I L I Z E D ( A L T I T U D E A N D L A T E R A L )

● M i s s i o n S E L E C T A U T O ( U A V T R A C K S T O W P T )

● L i n e o f s i g h t M A I N T A I N

● B a t t e r y M O N I T O R ( E x

. F a i l s a f e s e t t o l a n d N L T 1 4

. 2 )
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 106 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 106 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-90667 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 33-11161,
33-22862, 33-31116, 33-31117, 33-50608, 33-50610, 33-56707, 333-01409,
333-31369, 333-31670, 333-31371, 333-61843, 333-70323, 333-89231 and
333-43238 on Form S-8 of Informix Corporation of our report dated January 28,
2000 (March 1, 2000 as to Note 1, "Merger with Informix Corporation")
(relating to the consolidated financial statements of Ardent Software, Inc.
and subsidiaries, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and contains
an explanatory paragraph relating to the merger of Ardent Software, Inc. and
subsidiaries into Informix Corporation on March 1, 2000), appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Informix Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2000.




/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 23, 2001
### Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals

November 12 , 2009

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On November 12 , 2009 , representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) participated in a meeting to update intereste d members from the National Tribal

Air Association (NTAA) o n the status of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and

Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the:

• Proposed schedule for finalizing the rule
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Amin I. Khalifa, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ AMIN I. KHALIFAAmin I. Khalifa
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 6,
 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.35






Exhibit 10.35




TOYS “R” US, INC.

NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION




Date: ____________




Grant to:




 






          the right to purchase from Toys “R” Us, Inc. (the “Company”):



          ____________ shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a price of ____________ per
share.



          The foregoing options are “Options” as such term is defined in the Company’s Amended and
Restated Toys “R” Us, Inc. Management Equity Plan (as amended, the “Plan”), and are subject
to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan in effect from time to time.



          Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the undersigned resigns with Good Reason (as
defined in that certain employment agreement, entered into on _________, between the undersigned
and Toys “R” Us, Inc.), then such resignation shall be treated, for purposes of Article IX of the
plan, as if the undersigned has been terminated without Cause on the date of the undersigned’s
resignation.



          [Notwithstanding the foregoing or Section 10.6 of the Plan, the put rights set forth in
Article X of the Plan shall be applicable to this Award in accordance with the terms thereof.]



          This agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts (including by means of telecopied
signature pages), all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its duly authorized officers, has
caused this agreement to be executed as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	TOYS “R” US, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	Accepted and Agreed:

 	 	 
	
 	 	 
	Name:
CONSERVATION
& SUSTAINABILITY

DID YOU NATIONAL GUARD SNAPSHOT
eNow.

* The National Guard is a
leader in conservation and
sustainability efforts within
the Defense Department.

+ Michigan National
Guard’s Camp Grayling
has been net-zero for
water usage and waste
water production for more
than 20 years.

¢ Environmental
stewardship best practices
are shared with State
Partnership Program
partner countries like El
Salvador and Honduras.

DDD»
DYDD»
DDD»
DDD»
DDDDD
DDDDD

+ “No heat, no cool” weeks
in the Nevada Air National
Guard reduced energy
usage by 36% in 2014.

»> DDD)»

»

Army Guard Air Guard
, 100 homes

¢ West Virginia and Florida Solar and wind-generated electricity powered 3,114 homes in a year.
Army National Guard took
top honors in the 2016
Secretary of the Army

Environmental Awards. Since 2013, Army National

Guard decreased potable
water consumption by 786.3
million gallons; Air National
Guard decreased potable
water by 51.2 million gallons.

+ Guard members
completed 9,320 training
hours in working on or
building environmental
projects.

Land managed by

the Army Guard.
That’s roughly
three times the
size of the state
of Rhode Island.