alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.35


 


Compensatory Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors


 


Each
non-employee director (other than the chairman of the board) of PLC Systems
Inc. (the “Company”) receives $12,000 per year and the chairman of the board
receives $24,000 per year, paid in quarterly installments. In addition,
non-employee directors (other than the chairman of the board) who serve as
chairman of a committee receive an additional $500 per quarter and those who
serve on more than one committee also receive an additional $500 per quarter.
The Company reimburses its directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in attending meetings of the board of directors and committees of the
board of directors.


 


The
Company also grants stock options to its non-employee directors. Generally, on
the date of their initial election to the board of directors, new non-employee
directors receive an initial grant of an option to purchase 30,000 shares of
the Company’s common stock that vests in installments over three years. Once
the initial grant has fully vested, non-employee directors (other than the
chairman of the board) receive an annual grant of an option to purchase 15,000
shares of the Company’s common stock that generally vests in four equal
quarterly installments. The chairman of the board receives an annual grant of
an option to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that
generally vests in four equal quarterly installments. The annual grants are
generally made on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders.  All such options have an exercise price equal
to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from FY 1997 Q3
unaudited financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          34,848
<SECURITIES>                                    14,128
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                       884
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,446
<PP&E>                                          27,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,416
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,179
<SALES>                                         76,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,227
<CGS>                                           37,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,235)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,047
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,047
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Brian Garrett, et al.,

Plaintiff,

V.

The Ohio State University,

Defendant.

Lead Action 2:18-cv-692

Judge Michael H. Watson

Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers

ORDER

Certain Plaintiffs have moved for a status conference. See Mot., EOF No.

141 (Case No. 2:18-cv-692). Defendant opposes. At this time, the Court does

not find that mediation has reached an impasse such that a status conference or

case schedule is needed. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion, ECF No. 141, is

DENIED. Instead, the Court ORDERS these parties to continue to mediate in

good faith with Judge Barrett. Any concerns Plaintiffs may have with mediation

or the mediation process shall be raised with Judge Barrett.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD Doc #: 117 Filed: 03/17/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1976
Patricia POWELL v. RAPIDES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD

NO. 2018-C-0505

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

Denied.
Josias MANZANILLO, Appellant, v. Jacquelyn MANZANILLO, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2066

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 19, 2018

Andrew S. Berman of Young, Berman, Karpf & Gonzalez, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Marc Anthony Douthit, Miami Lakes, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, May and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1070 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit States from 

using proprietary voting system hardware or software in the administration of an election for Federal office which prevents the system from 

meeting the voluntary voting system guidelines for interoperability and 

auditability issued by the Election Assistance Commission under such 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2021 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit 

States from using proprietary voting system hardware 

or software in the administration of an election for Federal office which prevents the system from meeting the 

voluntary voting system guidelines for interoperability 

and auditability issued by the Election Assistance Commission under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

2 

•HR 1070 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Election Audit Trans3 parency Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF PROPRIETARY VOTING SYS5 TEM HARDWARE OR SOFTWARE NOT ENA6 BLING AUDITS. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 301(a) of the Help Amer8 ica Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081(a)) is amended 

9 by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(7) PROHIBITING USE OF PROPRIETARY HARD11 WARE OR SOFTWARE NOT MEETING VOLUNTARY

12 GUIDANCE FOR INTEROPERABILITY AND

13 AUDITABILITY.—The voting system may not use any 

14 proprietary hardware or software unless the manu15 facturer of the hardware or software provides the 

16 appropriate election official with such information 

17 and assistance as the official may require to enable 

18 the voting system to be interoperable and auditable 

19 in accordance with the most recent voluntary voting 

20 system guidelines issued by the Commission under 

21 this title.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 301(d) of such Act 

23 (52 U.S.C. 21081(d)) is amended by striking the period 

24 at the end and inserting the following: ‘‘, or, in the case 

3 

•HR 1070 IH

1 of the requirements of paragraph (7) of subsection (a), 

2 on and after January 1, 2022.’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          54,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,210,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   443,000
<INVENTORY>                                    580,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,767,000
<PP&E>                                       1,036,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 760,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,081,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,685,000
<BONDS>                                        250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,974,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,081,000
<SALES>                                      2,123,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,123,000
<CGS>                                          974,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,374,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,270,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,270,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.37)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 88 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 88

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2022

 Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Trone, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Brown 
  of Maryland, Ms. Norton, Ms. Wexton, and Mr. Raskin) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 18, 2022, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.
                                 <all>
```
9

Exhibit 10.3


Description of Consulting Arrangement Between
Registrant and Mr. William J. Werry

William J. Werry, a retired bank President,  has been retained as an independent
consultant  advising the Chairman of the  Registrant on a range of matters.  His
compensation is approved annually by the Board of Directors of Tri City National
Bank. His current  annual  compensation  for these services is $16,800,  payable
monthly, and is in addition to his compensation as a director.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,240,992
<SECURITIES>                                28,213,364
<RECEIVABLES>                                  213,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,829,534
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,829,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          874,481
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,955,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,829,534
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,473,521
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               819,516
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,654,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,654,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,654,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

5/31/19

 Southern District of Ohio

Christopher J Ondre

3:18-CV-284

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant; case is remanded to the commissioner under

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings

✔ Thomas M. Rose
Drone/VAS Practice Group 

ANTONELLI 

--LAW -

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Amendment to Exemption No. 12606 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015- 2111 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

35 E Wacker Drive 

Suite 1875 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Tel. 312.201.8310 

Jeffrev(t:vAntonelli-Law.com 

May 31 , 2016 

Our client, Truself Media, Inc. d/b/a Flight A V ("Flight A V") requests an amendment to 

Exemption No. 12606, Docket No. FAA-2015-2111 for: 

(1) Revising the name of the recipient of Exemption No. 12606 to "Truself Media, Inc. 

d/b/a Flight AV;" 

(2) Adding each of the previously-approved UAVs listed at Regulatory Docket No. FAA2007-3330 to the grant of exemption; and 

(3) Gaining permission to conduct closed-set motion picture and television operations. 

Flight AV's Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) is being 

submitted confidentially under separate cover. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35, Flight AVP requests 

confidential treatment for its MPTOM. It requests that the information contained in that exhibit 

not be made public because they are trade secrets whose disclosure would harm the owner of the 

information. It contains valuable commercial data that is not publically available and is protected 

from release under the Freedom oflnformation Act, 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(4). 

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this 

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 312-201-8310 or via email at Jeffrev@AntonelliLaw.com.
Exhibit 21

Carmike Cinemas, Inc.

List of Subsidiaries



|                                |  |                       |  |         |  
|------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------- | -
|Subsidiary                      |  | State ofIncorporation |  | % Owned |  
|Eastwynn Theatres, Inc.         |  | Alabama               |  | 100     | %
|George G. Kerasotes Corporation |  | Delaware              |  | 100     | %
|GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc.      |  | Indiana               |  | 100     | %
|GKC Michigan Theatres, Inc.     |  | Delaware              |  | 100     | %
|GKC Theatres, Inc.              |  | Delaware              |  | 100     | %
|Military Services, Inc.         |  | Delaware              |  | 100     | %
|Conway Theatres, LLC            |  | South Carolina        |  | 100     | %
#### People v Fields,

No. 91130;

Court of Appeals No. 133844.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 1997, and the related
consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31,
1997 and the notes thereto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such consolidated financial statements and notes.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          63,059
<SECURITIES>                                   193,789
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               284,180
<PP&E>                                          34,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 518,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,615
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       528,069
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,036)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   518,147
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,893
<CGS>                                            7,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,404
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,617
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00140-CR

RONNIE WILSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: May 3, 2012
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 93 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

the United States and the States to jointly ensure a high-quality education to all persons within the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 2, 2022 

Mr. DESAULNIER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require the United States and the States to 

jointly ensure a high-quality education to all persons 

within the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 93 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The United States, the States, Indian 

5 Tribes, and territories shall jointly ensure a high-quality 

6 education to all persons within the United States. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en8 force and implement this article by appropriate legisla9 tion.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS