alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *
Plaintiff(s), * Case No. 3:18-cr-39
- VS - * District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
DAVID D. HILL, at
Defendant(s). *

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate
Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #9), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)
and Fed. R. Crim. P. 59, and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for
filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(b )(2) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report

and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Plea Agreement herein and Defendant's plea of guilty

pursuant to that agreement be, and they hereby are, accepted.

April FO, 2018. ana

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lawrence M. Higby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ LAWRENCE M. HIGBY Lawrence M. Higby
Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

May 3, 2012 

via email and regulations.gov 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Delta Air Lines, Inc. China Frequency Return Notice 

DOT-OST-2007-28567 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) hereby returns to the Department the seven (7) U.S.-China 

frequencies granted by Order 2007-9-25 in Docket DOT-OST-2007-28567 (formerly used for 

Atlanta-Shanghai service). Delta continues to hold 40 U.S.-China frequencies. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 A copy of the foregoing has been served this 3rd day of May, 2012, upon the following persons

via email: 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

dan.weiss@united.com 

jonathan.linde@united.com 

oracio.marquez@united.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

keith.glatz@dot.gov 

info@airlineinfo.com
#### McPherson *v.*McPherson.

5-1498

311 S. W. 2d 535

Opinion delivered March 24, 1958.

[Rehearing denied April 21, 1958]

*W. H. Howard, John D. Eldridge, Jr.,*and *George. P. Eldridge,*for appellant.

*Wm. M. Moorhead*and *James A. Ross,*for appellee.

Ed. E. McFaddiN, Associate Justice.

This is a divorce case: Mrs. McPherson was plaintiff and Mr. McPherson was defendant. She alleged indignities and cruelty as grounds for divorce. Mr. McPherson filed a cross-complaint, but later withdrew it and sought a reconciliation. At the request of both sides the Trial Court heard the evidence in the absence of spectators; *935and we have concluded to likewise draw the veil of judicial silence on the evidence. The parties have been married for many years and have a family of three children.

In denying Mrs. McPherson’s divorce the Chancellor wrote a lengthy opinion, explaining that the evidence offered by her was not sufficiently corroborated to justify the Court in granting a divorce. It was evidently thought by the Chancellor that the parties might effect a reconciliation. In the opinion the Chancellor said of Mrs. McPherson: “She presents the appearance of a person who is not physically well and not able to stand the strain of court room tension.”

According to the evidence Mr. McPherson does not appear to have been free of fault; but we treat his offer of reconciliation as “tolling the fault”; so that if there should be no reconciliation and another suit should arise, then the refusal of a divorce in this case would not preclude Mrs. McPherson from showing, in the subsequent litigation, the same facts, as herein, not only as to the divorce but also as to property rights. Under such conditions, we affirm the decree of the Chancery Court, which denied Mrs. McPherson a divorce on the evidence in this record.

The Chancery Court awarded Mrs. McPherson $250 per month for support of herself and her 12-year-old daughter. We conclude that Mrs. McPherson is entitled to support money of $500.00 per month for herself and her daughter, and that this increase in amount should begin with the date of this opinion and continue until the Chancery Court finds that there is a change in circumstances. To this extent, we modify the decree here involved. We also conclude that Mrs. McPherson is entitled to. $500.00 additional attorney’s fee for this appeal, and to all costs of all courts.

The decree is, therefore, affirmed in part and modified in part; and the cause is remanded to re-invest the Chancery Court with jurisdiction.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

36 37 38 39 

### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0560

IN THE MATTER OF:

S.N.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 26, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 20 2020

04/20/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0560
[Cite as State v. Nelson , 2019-Ohio-922.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

FAYETTE COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,

Appellee,

- vs -

SHAWNA E. NELSON,

Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA2018-05-007 CA2018-05-008

D E C I S I O N 3/18/2019

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM FAYETTE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CRI 20170222

Jess C. Weade, Fayette County Prosecuting Attorney, 110 East Court Street, Washington C.H., OH 43160, for appellee

Stephen H. Eckstein, 1208 Bramble Avenue, Washington C.H., Ohio 43160, for appellant

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant Shawna E. Nelson, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the

transcript of proceeding s and original pape rs from the Fayette County Court of Common

Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶ 2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review______________________

- 2 - of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be

predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders

at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without

infringement of appellant's constitutional righ ts; (4) requests permission to withdraw as

counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies

that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response

having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of

counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is

dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., RINGLAND and PIPER, JJ., concur.
14910-13-PI DEPARTJ\<IENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal A\"i<ltion Administration _eM""".'."" 

## VV4aYrP 1;4eFR 

### Parr 39 

# OQS2 IDockl't No. FAA-2010J'''''''**; DireClOrall' Idenritkr 2010-NM-131-AOj Rll'i 2120-.'\.-\64 Ain\!Jnhin('s~ Directh'l's: Airbus :\-locie] ;\,33(121)1) anti -:.JUUScrics Airp!:HlC"s: :md A.(;ENC'{: F•..•

dcra! AViation !\d11lin\strat!{1n (FAA), DOT. ,\CTIO!\": :"otice ofproposeL1 ruknnkll1g tNPW"'l). 

## ", .. ,..A~.,.',....,~ "" SLJ\IJ\IARY: \\"e propose to ;.,clOpl2 l]C\\ Jif\VT1h,ncss dlT<:ct)\C (ADI Cor the 

## PWdl.1Cl';:'C-t..-._ liSled above. This proposed :\.D rCSldl$rT\11l1m;;ndalOr~ cominuillii ilJn.\orllllll'':SS 

# I S/1:.'O

# 1/-0

, I' 'Ie 1 " d I "II . 1 . j 

# '1'1 

# ~'iLi~ III onllallon t! i .A ) onglll<:lc )1 an a\'];111011 <l1l1l(Jl"lly QI :JJH'LK'r eQunln lO IL~'J111 V ",~~,,::, A-;::;:"- ;ml1 comxt an unsufetc>mhiioi1 on Ull3\'1:11;011 p .dUd The \'lC,\! de5crib~'" lh, llm:J(~ 

# y..--a.J -I Ii
ITJlw FAA pubiish<,:d SF.:'\R 138 (Special FCtkrnl AVlution R..:gulallLlIl 881.

F'.1lil!TCof the Lll[\]liary pov,:er ulli! (APljl bleed kak detection sys1l:m could rcsuh 111 

## • 

# • • 

# • Bv Illail relcrenccJ O-iOO'02j07/01~L29f:, March 41h.l001 ami O~(Jf)'O]j07t03-1J)~-l-of February 2603 \hc JAA fCC"Oll1mcndcJ;0 ;he National A",,,,,io,,, Ai!thoritics (NAA) th± appl;;:al1on of a SHllll2.f regul:lllon The aim Oflhis regulation is to rcquir..: 

### *"' 

## '* a ddinilion r';:\'IC\V' ,lg:lil1S; explosi\'>11 hal.:lrds_

v',,, '",>[ oi',i>, Iud lank 10e<1"0 '" Ihe i>OU/onl 

# ,,,,bil,"" and 'S",u"n ,,' Ihe 

# f"", ','I"'"
FAt:. Form' 361}-14.1 (6-89) O,=FICIAl FILECO?~ '" US GO",'"::"'·'11", f "1'","'TI"';; <:"r,C!' '%.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03579**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03579\03579_Checklist_102910_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03579\03579_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03579\03579_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03579\03579_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03579\03579_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03579\03579_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03579\Certification Statement Plant ID 03579.pdf Plant certification statement x 03579\Supplemental Documents\Fort St Vrain 03579 A5-3.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03579\Supplemental Documents\Fort St[1]. Vrain 003579 A7-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03579\Supplemental Documents\Fort St[1]. Vrain 03579 A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Executive Order 14062

# 2022 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 801-946a), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473 of April 13, 1984, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1.**                     Parts II and IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, are amended as described in the Annex attached to and made a part of this order.                

**Sec. 2.**                     These amendments shall take effect as of the date of this order, subject to the following:                

(a) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.

(b) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the date of this order, and any such nonjudicial punishment, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial, or other action may proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if these amendments had not been prescribed.

Billing code 3395-F2-P

[FR Doc. 2022-02027

Billing code 5001-06-C
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 3, 2022

No. 04-22-00553-CV

IN RE Sterling DE LOS SANTOS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On August 30, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the 

trial court abused its discretion by granting real party in interest’s writ of habeas corpus. The 

record reveals that further proceedings will take place on October 3, 2022 (the “October 3 

hearing”), which may affect the merits of relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Accordingly, we ABATE the case until the conclusion of the October 3 hearing.

Relator is ORDERED to file in this court either an order from the October 3 hearing, a 

transcript of the October 3 hearing, or the appropriate motion to dismiss this mandamus 

proceeding no later than 15 days after the October 3 hearing.

It is so ORDERED on October 3, 2022.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022CI15379, styled In the Interest of K.L.N., A Child, pending in the 

45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Laura Salinas presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTIANS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AETHOLON MEDICAL, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          22,878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,037
<PP&E>                                         168,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,332,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,420,605
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,772
<OTHER-SE>                                    (91,037)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,332,340
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,321
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               332,907
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             314,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (625,784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       659
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (626,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (626,443)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           3,043
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,043
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        21,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,322)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,043
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,471)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,471)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|        |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                       |        |                          |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
| /s/ Robert H. Schottenstein           |   | Date:  February 28, 2011 |
| Robert H. Schottenstein               |   |                     |
| Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and |   |                     |
| President                             |   |                     |
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, W. Phillip Marcum, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metretek Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) *[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 11, 2006 /s/ W. Phillip Marcum W. Phillip Marcum
**Exhibit
      23 (i)**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**











Board
      of
      Directors and Stockholders


Enigma
      Software Group, Inc.


Stamford,
      CT 06902








We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-125290) of Enigma
      Software Group ,
      Inc.,
      of our report dated March 21, 2006, relating to the financial statements, which
      appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference
      in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.








Bagell,
      Josephs, Levine & Company, LLC





Gibbsboro,
      New Jersey


April
      6,
      2006