alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Case number: 01-11-01125-CR

Style: Elisa Merrill Wilson v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed:January 15, 2015

Party filing motion: Appellant

Appellant’s motion for leave to file supplemental brief on remand is granted. 

The State’s response, if any, is due by February 10, 2015.

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting individually 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Date: January 22, 2015
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 76 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Health and 

Human Services relating to ‘‘Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, 

Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2022 

Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas (for himself, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. ELLZEY, Mr. 

BANKS, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. HUIZENGA, Mrs. 

HINSON, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. 

HUDSON, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mrs. WALORSKI, 

Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Mr. 

BARR, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. MAST, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Ms. TENNEY, 

Mr. GUEST, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. LONG, Mr. ESTES, Ms. 

FOXX, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. BABIN, 

Mr. ROSE, Mr. BENTZ, Mr. SMUCKER, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. CARL, Mr. 

SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. JOHNSON of 

South Dakota, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. WENSTRUP, Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. CLINE, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. CRAWFORD, and 

Mr. BOST) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Health and Human Services relating 

to ‘‘Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, ClientCentered, Quality Family Planning Services’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 76 IH 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Health and Human Services relating to ‘‘En5 suring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, 

6 Quality Family Planning Services’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 56144 

7 (October 7, 2021)), and such rule shall have no force or 

8 effect. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Melvin RAY v. STATE

CR-15-1118

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
In the Pentagon’s 2014 budget request, the Army would receive $129.7 billion, a 

1.7 percent decline from DoD’s enacted 2013 budget. The enacted 2013 budget 

numbers do not include reductions resulting from the sequester. The Air Force 

budget request jumped 3.3 percent to $144.4 billion compared to the 2013 enacted 

budget and the defense-wide request remained nearly identical at $96.8 billion.

DoD has requested $4.7 billion for cyber-related operations, an $800 million 

increase from the level enacted in 2013. It also requested $2 billion for 21 

Boeing EA-18G Growler jamming aircraft, $2.1 billion for 18 Lockheed Martin C130J cargo planes, $3.2 billion for precision munitions, $3.8 billion for the 16 

Boeing P-8A surveillance aircraft and $1.9 billion for five United Launch 

Alliance Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles.

DoD requested $8.4 billion for 29 Lockheed Martin F-35 joint strike fighters: 19 

for the Air Force, six for the Marine Corps and four for the Navy. Of that, $1.9 

billion is for development efforts.

The Air Force requested $1.6 billion for continued development of the Boeing KC46A aerial refueling tanker and $400 million to design and develop a new bomber.

The Air Force proposal also requests $507 million for 12 General Atomics MQ-9 

Reapers; $1.2 billion for four Lockheed MC-130Js, one HC-130J and five AC-130 

gunships; $231 million for three Bell-Boeing CV-22 Ospreys; and $397 million for 

two new combat rescue helicopters. The service also requested $1.2 billion for 

two Lockheed Martin GPS III satellites.

The Army requested $1.8 billion for network-related efforts, $395 million for 

Stryker vehicles, $178 million for Abrams tank upgrades and $158 million for 

Bradley modernization.

As for aircraft, the Army requested $1 billion for six new and 22 remanufactured 

Boeing CH-47F helicopters, $184 million for Bell OH-58 upgrades, $1.2 billion for 

65 Sikorsky Black Hawk helicopters, $813 million for 42 remanufactured Boeing AH64 Apache helicopters, $96 million for 10 Eurocopter UH-72 Lakota helicopters and 

$518 million for 15 General Atomics MQ-1 Gray Eagle unmanned aircraft.

The Pentagon said its budget proposal would save $13.7 billion by terminating and 

restructuring programs. This includes terminating the Precision Tracking Space 

System, the future Space Based Surveillance follow-on and “redundant” unmanned 

vertical take-off and landing aircraft.

The request also delays procurement of new Apache helicopters and reduces Army 

Light Utility Helicopter procurement.

The 2014 request includes an additional $88 billion “placeholder” to fund war 

operations in Afghanistan. DoD plans to submit a war budget request in late April 

or early May.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**
I, Jack H. Brown, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Stater Bros. Holdings Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-l5(e) and 15d-l5(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 11, 2005     /s/ Jack H. Brown  Jack H. Brown  Chairmanof the Board, President,
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000799171
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM II - 10, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         13763
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29237
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               44175
<PP&E>                                         1915573
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1458008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 501740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          94529
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     407211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   501740
<SALES>                                        259780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               259780
<CGS>                                          130156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               37065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   92559
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
1

The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-1139

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Jose H. Valles-Juarez, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 22, 2007

Filed: January 25, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jose Valles-Juarez appeals the 168-month sentence the district court1

 imposed

after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 846. For reversal, he argues the court gave undue weight to the

Guidelines and did not properly account for the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors that

favored a lower sentence. 
-2-

We disagree, and conclude that the sentence--which was at the bottom of the

undisputed Guidelines range--is not unreasonable. See United States v. Booker, 543

U.S. 220, 261-62 (2005) (appellate courts must review sentences for

unreasonableness); United States v. Tobacco, 428 F.3d 1148, 1151 (8th Cir. 2005)

(presumptively reasonable sentence can be unreasonable if district court failed to

consider relevant factor that should have received significant weight, gave significant

weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or considered only appropriate factors but

committed clear error of judgment in weighing them); United States v. Lincoln, 413

F.3d 716, 717-18 (8th Cir.) (sentence within Guidelines range is presumptively

reasonable; defendant bears burden to rebut presumption), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 840

(2005). At sentencing the district court recited the section 3553(a) factors and

indicated it had considered all of them, stating in particular that the criminal-justice

goals of deterrence and an opportunity for rehabilitation supported the sentence it

chose. See United States v. Long Soldier, 431 F.3d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir. 2005)

(relevant inquiry is whether district court actually considered § 3553(a) factors and

whether appellate court’s review of factors leads to conclusion that they support

reasonableness of district court’s sentencing decision); United States v. Franklin, 397

F.3d 604, 606-07 (8th Cir. 2005) (all that is required is evidence that district court

considered relevant matters, not that court made specific findings on each § 3553(a)

factor). Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________
Demetrius Avery JACKSON v. STATE

CR-15-1099

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017 Reh. denied March 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 58 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 58

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
of the commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the dedication of the 
                      Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2021

     Mr. Bost (for himself and Mr. Takano) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
of the commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the dedication of the 
                      Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL.

    The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on November 10, 
2021, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the 100th 
anniversary of the dedication of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

SEC. 2. PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE CEREMONY.

    Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


               I, William B. Yarmuth, Chief Executive Officer of Almost Family,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual
                period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
                with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.





Date: March 29, 2007

By  /s/ William B. Yarmuth
        ------------------------
        William B. Yarmuth
        Chairman of the Board,
          President & Chief Executive Officer


A signed  copy of this  original  statement  required  by  Section  906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.
# Navy Exchange Service Command’s Second Micro Market@Sea is Underway

### 11 Jan 2024

“Our Micro Market offers convenience and accessibility to the men and women aboard this ship with the goal to drive up morale and mission readiness,” said Scott Gray, Vice President, NEXCOM’s Ships Store Program. “This new operation provides our Sailors with access to over 200 food, beverage and toiletry items. The functional ability for this store is to remain open 24 hours a day/seven days a week, giving the crew increased opportunity to grab a bite to eat or even a boost of vitamin C in between odd hours and duty.”

The 600 square foot Micro Market@Sea operation utilizes a self-checkout register. To checkout, Sailors insert their CAC cards, scan the items for purchase and pay with their Navy Cash Card. Like a ship’s store, profits generated from sales will to back to the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower to support its MWR program.

NEXCOM’s Ships Store Program launched the first Micro Market@Sea concept onboard the USS San Antonio (LPD 19) in November 2020. Worldwide, there are currently 77 NEX Micro Market ashore operations, located in Navy hospitals, aircraft hangars, office spaces and shipyards.                                                                       

## Quick Facts

## Contact
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>  The accompanying supplemental data are to be used in conjunction 
with the unaudited financial statements and associated notes to the 
financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 1997.

</LEGEND>

       

<S>                                     <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          0
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   440,719 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     582,428 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                989,551
<PP&E>                                          3,405,745 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  5,060,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,385,883
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        5,889
<OTHER-SE>                                      9,830,245 <F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    5,060,560
<SALES>                                         2,225,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,225,000
<CGS>                                           546,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,141,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (69,397)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (985,846)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (985,846)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (985,846)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
<FN>
<F1> Receivalbes are recorded net of allowance for doubtful accounts
<F2> PP&E is recorded net of depreciation
<F3> Other stockholder's equity includes additional paid in capital
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aethlon Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. Based on my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.





Date: August 16, 2010





By:
/s/  James A. JoyceJames A. JoyceChief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 15 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2021 

Mr. MEEKS (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. LIEU, Mr. 

KHANNA, Ms. LEE of California, and Mr. MCGOVERN) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of 

certain defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is prohibited: 

5 (1) The transfer of the following defense arti6 cles, including defense services and technical data, 

7 described in Transmittal No. 20–13, submitted to 

8 Congress pursuant to section 36(b) of the Arms Ex9 port Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)): The proposed 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 15 IH 

1 sale of 3,000 GBU–39/B Small Diameter Bomb I 

2 (SDB I), including containers; weapon support and 

3 support equipment; spare and repair parts; U.S. 

4 Government and contractor engineering, technical 

5 and logisitical support services; and other related 

6 elements of logistical and program support. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS