5794 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019, 

86 FR 58871 (October 25, 2021). 

2See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review, 

and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 

2018–2019, 86 FR 21277 (April 22, 2021), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

at 5. 

3 Id. 

1See Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: 

Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 41813 (August 3, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 41814. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from 

Malaysia: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020,’’ dated November 22, 2021. 

4Commerce continues to treat affiliates Region 

International Co. Ltd. and Region System Sdn. Bhd. 

(collectively, Region) as a collapsed single entity for 

the final results of this review. See Preliminary 

Results PDM at 5–6. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the 2019–2020 Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain 

Steel Nails from Malaysia,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 6See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2–4. 

Background 

On October 25, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

final results of the 2018–2019 

administrative review of the AD order 

on certain crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

assembled into modules, from China.1

Commerce inadvertently omitted Wuxi 

Suntech Power Co., Ltd/Luoyang 

Suntech Power Co., Ltd. from the list of 

companies that did not ship subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR.2 We hereby notify the public 

that in the final results of 2018–2019 

administrative review of the AD order 

on certain crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

assembled into modules from China, 

Commerce continued to find that, 

during the POR, there were no entries of 

subject merchandise into the United 

States from, or exports or sales of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States by, Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd/ 

Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd.3

Therefore, Wuxi Suntech Power Co., 

Ltd/Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 

should be included in the list of 

companies that did not ship subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 27, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02106 Filed 2–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–557–816] 

Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that certain 

steel nails from Malaysia were not sold 

at less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR), July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable February 2, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Preston Cox, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5041. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 3, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

2019–2020 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain steel 

nails from Malaysia.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results.2 On November 22, 

2021, we extended the deadline for 

these final results until January 28, 

2022.3 This review covers one 

mandatory respondent: Region.4 The 

producers/exporters not selected for 

individual examination are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of the Administrative 

Review’’ section of this notice. For a 

complete description of the events that 

followed the Preliminary Results, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the scope of 

the order are certain steel nails from 

Malaysia. For a complete description of 

the scope of this administrative review, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties 

in this review are discussed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is made available 

to the public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of the 

topics included in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received from 

interested parties regarding our 

Preliminary Results, and for the reasons 

explained in the Issues and Decision 

memorandum, we made no changes to 

the margin calculation methodology 

used in the Preliminary Results; 

however, we have changed the margin 

for these final results of review, as 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rates for Non-Selected Respondents 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weighted 

average of the estimated weighted 

average dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices 5795 

7Commerce continues to treat Inmax Sdn. Bhd. 

and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd. as a collapsed 

single entity for the final results of this review. See 

Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 41814. 

8See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

9See Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value, 80 FR 34370 (June 16, 2015). 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}. 

For these final results, we have 

calculated a weighted-average dumping 

margin for Region that is zero or de 

minimis, and we have not calculated 

any margins which are not zero, de 

minimis, or determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. Accordingly, we 

have assigned to the companies not 

individually examined a margin of zero 

percent. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine that the following 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020: 

Producer/exporter 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Region International Co., Ltd. 

and Region System Sdn. Bhd 0.00 

Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd7 .................. 0.00 

Tag Fasteners Sdn. Bhd ............ 0.00 

Disclosure of Calculations 

Normally, Commerce discloses to the 

parties in a proceeding the calculations 

performed in connection with the final 

results of review in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). However, because 

Commerce made no adjustments to the 

margin calculation methodology used in 

the Preliminary Results, there are no 

calculations to disclose for the final 

results of review. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. Because we 

calculated a margin for Region which is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of this review, we intend to instruct CBP 

to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies identified above that 

were not selected for individual 

examination, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate entries at the rates established 

in these final results of review. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the period of review produced by 

any of these companies for which it did 

not know its merchandise was destined 

for the United States, we will instruct 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.8

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). The final 

results of this administrative review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise under review and for 

future cash deposits of estimated 

antidumping duties, where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the notice of these final results for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 

rate for companies subject to this review 

will be equal to the company-specific 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of the 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the original investigation but the 

producer has been covered in a prior 

completed segment of this proceeding, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established in the completed 

segment for the most recent period for 

the producer of the merchandise; and 

(4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 2.66 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.9 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221. 

Dated: January 26, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts 

Available 

Comment 2: Clerical Error 

Comment 3: Correction to Draft 

Liquidation Instructions 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02103 Filed 2–1–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1