[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6169-6170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0750; FRL-9451-01-OCSPP]


Pesticide Registration Review; Proposed Interim Decisions for 
Several Pesticides; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed 
interim registration review decisions and opens a 60-day public comment 
period on the proposed interim decisions for the following pesticides: 
Dimethoxane; ferbam; iprodione; laminarin; linalool; thiram; and ziram.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 4, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the docket 
identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest 
provided in the Table in Unit IV., using the Federal eRulemaking Portal 
at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for 
submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional 
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more 
information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA/DC 
and Reading Room is closed to visitors with limited exceptions. The 
staff continues to provide remote customer service via email, phone, 
and webform. For the latest status information on the EPA/DC and docket 
access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    For pesticide specific information, contact: The Chemical Review 
Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the Table in Unit 
IV.
    For general information on the registration review program, 
contact: Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), 
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91f3f8e2f2fef4bffcf4fdf0fff8f4d1f4e1f0bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27454e54444842094a424b46494e426742574609404851">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general and may be of 
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human 
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; 
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, 
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be 
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific 
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions 
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, 
consult the Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest 
identified in the Table 1 in Unit IV.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or 
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting 
your comments, see the commenting tips at: https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental 
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, 
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development, 
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and 
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the 
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population 
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other 
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human 
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides 
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. Background

    Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide 
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the 
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform 
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human 
health or the environment. As part of the registration review process, 
the Agency has completed proposed interim decisions for all pesticides 
listed in the Table 1 in Unit IV. Through this program, EPA is ensuring 
that each pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and 
other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the 
environment.

III. Authority

    EPA is conducting its registration review of the chemicals listed 
in the Table 1 in Unit IV pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal 
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural 
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. 
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the 
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under 
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only 
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA 
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with 
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must 
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on 
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the 
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the 
use of a pesticide in or on food.

IV. What action is the agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability 
of EPA's proposed interim registration review decisions for the 
pesticides shown in Table 1 and opens a 60-day public comment period on 
the proposed interim registration review decisions.

[[Page 6170]]



                                       Table 1--Proposed Interim Decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                        Chemical review manager
 Registration review case name and No.                   Docket ID No.                  and contact information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimethoxane, Case Number 3064..........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0686                          Kimberly Wilson,
                                                                                        <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#76011f1a051918581d1f1b1413041a0f3613061758111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d1a04011e0203430604000f081f01142d081d0c430a021b">[email protected]</span></a>,
                                                                                        (202) 566-0647.
Ferbam, Case Number 8000...............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0567                          Marisa Wright,
                                                                                        <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c6b6e757b746832717d6e756f7d5c796c7d327b736a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5225203b353a267c3f33203b2133123722337c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>,
                                                                                        (202) 566-2335.
Iprodione, Case Number 2335............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0392                          Rachel Fletcher,
                                                                                        <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb9d979e8f98939e89d5899a98939e97bb9e8b9ad59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f59535a4b5c575a4d114d5e5c575a537f5a4f5e11585049">[email protected]</span></a>,
                                                                                        (202) 566-2354
Laminarin, Case Number 6309............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0445                          Jennifer Odom,
                                                                                        <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e515a515310545b505057585b4c7e5b4e5f10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2cdc6cdcf8cc8c7cccccbc4c7d0e2c7d2c38cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>,
                                                                                        (202) 566-1536
Linalool, Case Number 6058.............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0423                          Hannah Dean,
                                                                                        <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f49091959ada9c959a9a959cb4918495da939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4622232728682e272828272e0623362768212930">[email protected]</span></a>,
                                                                                        (202) 566-1531
Thiram, Case Number 0122...............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0433                          Marisa Wright,
                                                                                        <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8bfcf9e2ece3ffa5e6eaf9e2f8eacbeefbeaa5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="691e1b000e011d4704081b001a08290c1908470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>,
                                                                                        (202) 566-2335
Ziram, Case Number 8001................  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0568                          Marisa Wright,
                                                                                        <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b1c19020c031f45060a1902180a2b0e1b0a450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7403061d131c005a1915061d0715341104155a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>,
                                                                                        (202) 566-2335
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The registration review docket for a pesticide includes earlier 
documents related to the registration review case. For example, the 
review opened with a Preliminary Work Plan, for public comment. A Final 
Work Plan was placed in the docket following public comment on the 
Preliminary Work Plan.
    The documents in the dockets describe EPA's rationales for 
conducting additional risk assessments for the registration review of 
the pesticides included in the tables in Unit IV, as well as the 
Agency's subsequent risk findings and consideration of possible risk 
mitigation measures. These proposed interim registration review 
decisions are supported by the rationales included in those documents. 
Following public comment, the Agency will issue interim or final 
registration review decisions for the pesticides listed in Table 1 in 
Unit IV.
    The registration review final rule at 40 CFR 155.58(a) provides for 
a minimum 60-day public comment period on all proposed interim 
registration review decisions. This comment period is intended to 
provide an opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating 
any necessary amendments to the proposed interim decision. All comments 
should be submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES and must be received 
by EPA on or before the closing date. These comments will become part 
of the docket for the pesticides included in the Tables in Unit IV. 
Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked 
``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late comments.
    The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the 
closing date and may provide a ``Response to Comments Memorandum'' in 
the docket. The interim registration review decision will explain the 
effect that any comments had on the interim decision and provide the 
Agency's response to significant comments.
    Background on the registration review program is provided at: 
https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: January 27, 2022.
Mary Elissa Reaves,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide 
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022-02197 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>