alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certifications**
I, Michael W. Patrick, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Carmike Cinemas, Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statementsfor external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
May 2, 2005
/s/ Michael W. Patrick
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             761
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                        55
<INVENTORY>                                        491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,968
<PP&E>                                          12,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,067
<BONDS>                                          7,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,667
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,772)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,241
<SALES>                                          6,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,747
<CGS>                                            7,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    40
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (265)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,414)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 27 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 

Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of 
2 

•HJ 27 EH 

1 Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 

2 than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the ex3 piration of the term of David M. Rubenstein of Maryland 

4 on May 7, 2021, is filled by the appointment of Barbara 

5 M. Barrett of Arizona. The appointment is for a term of 

6 1,912 days, beginning on May 8, 2021, or the date of the 

7 enactment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs later. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 27 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett 

the Smithsonian Institution. as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of
scl-ex102_12.htm


Exhibit10.2

AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment (“Amendment”) is made and effective as of July 21, 2015, by and between Stepan Company, a Delaware Corporation (“Stepan”) and Mr. John V. Venegoni (“Consultant”).  

 

WHEREAS, Stepan and Consultant entered into a Consulting Agreement (“Agreement”), effective September 5, 2014; 

 

WHEREAS, per Section 13 of the Agreement, the parties may not modify or amend the Agreement without the express permission of both parties in a writing;

 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties, and intending to be legally bound, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as stated below. Any capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed in the Agreement, as amended. 

 

1.The definition of “Term” as stated in Section 3 of the Agreement shall be extended to “the period commencing on the end of the business day September 5, 2014 and ending on March 31, 2016.”

 

2.The definition of “Base Fee” as stated in Section 5 of the Agreement shall be amended to “a lump sum fee of $90,000 for the Consulting Services.”  The Base Fee shall be paid in installments no later than March 31, 2016.

 

3.Except as modified by the foregoing, the Agreement, as amended, shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  

 

4.This Amendment shall not be altered or modified in any way other than in a writing signed by the parties hereto.

 

5.This Amendment (including the recitals) and the Agreement (as amended hereby) contain the entire understanding of Stepan and Consultant with respect to the subject matter and supersede all prior agreements and understandings (including verbal agreements) between Stepan and Consultant with respect to the subject matter.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument.  Signatures transmitted between the parties via electronic means (including email attachments and facsimiles) shall constitute original signatures.  Nothing in this Amendment shall be deemed as a waiver of any of Stepan’s rights under the Agreement, all of which are reserved.  

 

[Signatures on following page]

1

 




Exhibit10.2

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by the authorized representatives as of the date first set forth above.

 

 


		
	
Stepan Company

 

By:_______________________________

Name: Greg Servatius

Title: Vice President – Human Resources

 
	
John V. Venegoni

 

By: ______________________________

 




 

2
Exhibit 31.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James F. Brooks, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BrandPartners Group, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's   other  certifying  officer  and  I  am  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the  registrant's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
function):

      a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ James F. Brooks
-----------------------
James F. Brooks
Chief Executive Officer
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0031

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM135AD

670BA-32-023, RB --- 3/5/08

670BA-32-023, RA --- 1/7/08

670BA-32-023 --- 10/24/07

REO 670-32-11-235, RJ --- 11/24/09

GOODRICH 49200-32-45, R1 --- 8/29/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Eleuterio Ortiz OLIVO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3895

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
DronePro	LLC

33300	Egypt	Lane	Suite	G300 | 832-447-1239 | joeypjohnston@gmail.com

November	30,	2015

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

Docket	Management System

1200	New	Jersey	Ave.,	SE

Washington,	DC	20590

Revision	to	docket	submission	Document	ID:	FAA-2015-4481-0001

Dear	Sir	or	Madam,

In	addition	to	our	previous	submission	of	drone	platforms	we	respectfully	ask	for	the	Lockheed	Martin	Indago	to	be	

added	into	our	exeption.

Please	see	the	attached	information to	add	the	Lockheed	Martin	Indago	to	our	list	of	drone	platforms.

Sincerely,

DronePro	LLC

Joey	Johnston
Directors' Annual Compensation



 Exhibit 10.5 
 Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation 
 Directors’ Annual Compensation 
 As of December 31, 2008 
  

				
	 Annual Retainer
	  	Amount
	 Service as Director for the Company
	  	$	2,000
	 Service as Director for the Bank
	  	$	5,000
		
	 Meeting Fees (Non-Employee Directors)
	  	 
	 Committee Meetings for the Company
	  	$	250 per meeting
	 Committee Meetings for the Bank
	  	$	250 per meeting
Wilbert BYNES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Clarence GARVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2826

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Daryl A. REA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States African Development Foundation

# AGENCY:

United States African Development Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The US African Development Foundation (USADF) will hold its quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors to discuss the agency's programs and administration. This meeting will occur at the USADF office.

# DATES:

The meeting date is Tuesday, February 1, 2022, 10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting location is USADF, 1400 I St. NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nina-Belle Mbayu, (202)233-8808.

*Authority:*                         Public Law 96-533 (22 U.S.C. 290h).                    

Dated: January 26, 2022.

Nina-Belle Mbayu,

Associate General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2022-01977 Filed 1-31-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6117-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30908

Summary Calendar

ROBERT JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HISTORIC RESTORATION, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(98-CV-3088-B)

-------------------- February 2, 2000

Before POLITZ, JONES, and WIENER, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Johnson appeals the dismissal with

prejudice by the district court of his employment discrim ination

and tort claims against Defendant-Appellee Historic Restoration,

Inc. ("HR"), for failure timely and properly to effectuate service

of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P ro. 4. Concluding that (1)

the distr ict court correctly determined that Johnson's otherwise

timely service on a common law employee of HR without demonstrating

anything approaching a diligent effort to accomplish service on

that corporation's registered agent was ineffective, and (2) the2

district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to give

Johnson additional time to effect service, principa lly because

Johnson failed to show good cause for his failure to accomplish

valid service within the statutory 120 days following the filing of

his complaint, we affirm.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and the facts

and law as related to us by counsel in their respective appellate

briefs, and have likewise carefully considered the Order & Reasons

entered by the district court on July 20, 1999, as a result of

which we are convince d that the district court not only did not

commit reversible error but affirmatively ruled correctly and

analyzed the issues accurately and completely. Rather than wasting

judicial resources by writing anew, there fore, we affirm for the

reasons set forth by the district court an d adopt its Order &

Reasons by reference.

AFFIRMED.
### SERVED: October 10,2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF Kenneth Santodomingo DOCKETNO. FAA 2014-0407 (Civil Penalty Action).


### AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER We do not anticipate reaching this case priorto January 2015. Unless specifically changedherein all prior orders remain in effect. WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. On or before January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, butnot limitedto, depositions, document production, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after January 9, 2015, subject to the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

1SERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591

.Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Kenneth Santodomingo, Respondent Reg. No. 45762-177 P.O. Box 9000 Seagovillel TX 75159-9000 ONE COPY

Gregory S. Lander, Complainant's Counsel Safety Enforcement Branch Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 TEL: 817-222-5083 FAX: 817-222-5945 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0407 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
<PAGE>   1
                                   Exhibit 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc.
Mount Vernon, New York



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of this Registration Statement of our reports dated April 6,
2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Michael
Anthony Jewelers, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") appearing in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 27, 2001.



BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York

April 26, 2001
SI0-1{K)9()1-()7 S OWEN S CORNIN Q 114S 1 WES

T AIRPOR

T SERVIC E ROA D SVW.TON.OH.3553 ^^^PARTMEN TO F



## . - •^ M OPERMION S

' mnC T! 2 A S : ! 2

Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretar yo f Transportatio n U.S. Departmen t o f Transportatio n 40 0 7V n Street , S.W. , Washingto n D.C . 20590 August 26,201 0 Secretar yLaHood : Th e Toled o Expres

s Airpor t has suffere d fro m a significan t declin e i n it s ai rservic e ove rth e pas t decade . Airlin e capacit ya t Toled o Expres s i s dow n 66

% fro m 200

2 an d th e numbe r o f airline s servin g th e communit yi s dow n fro m si

xt o three . I n ligh t o f thi s circumstanc e th e Toled o Expres s Airpor t an d it s communit ypartner

s hav e mad e a n applicatio n fo ra Smal l CommunityAi rService Developmen t Progra m Grant . Thi s Gran t woul d b e use d fo ra n aggressive an d extende d marketin g an d promotiona l campaig n t o recaptur e Toled o are a ai rtrave l deman d tha t is no wusin g alternativ e airport s Th e Airpor

t an d it s partners wil l matc h th e Gran t fundin g wit h a significan t loca l cas h match . The Airpor

t has als o develope d a comprehensiv e ne wai rservic e incentiv e program , includin g groun d handlin g suppor t an d startu p phas e fe e waivers . Th e combinatio n o f th e Gran t supporte d marketin g an d promotiona l fundin g an d th e Airpor t develope d incentiv e progra m wil l giv e Toled o th e tool s i t need s t o revers e th e leakag e of loca l ai rtrave l deman d t o othe rairport s an d re-establis h som e o f th e ai rservic e tha t ha s bee n tos

t i n recen t years . I urg e yo u t o giv e th e Toled o Smal l CommunityGran t Applicatio n you rfullest consideration . Favorabl e consideratio n of thi s Gran t applicatio n b yth e Departmen t o f Transportatio n woul d b e greattyappreciated . Sincerely , / OWLN S 'COIiNIN G • • MNOtUHN H mmi *

TerryT . Smit h Directo rflight Operation s Owen s Comin g

OWEN S CORNIN G
Shirley NELLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0823

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 15, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.