alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Xavier FUTRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3379

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  this
statement of operations dated March 31,1998 and is qualified in this entirety by
refrerence to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                            0000882362
<NAME>                                    Paracelsian, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
<CURRENCY>                                              USD
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                              557,238
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                         171,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    939,314
<PP&E>                                              304,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                       31,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,148,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               270,533
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            148,710
<OTHER-SE>                                        1,877,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,148,138
<SALES>                                              35,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     35,645
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    932,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (863,243)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (863,243)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.19**

 

**MartenTransport, Ltd.**

**2006Non-employee Director Compensation Summary**

 

The Board of Directors of Marten Transport, Ltd. approved the followingfee schedule for non-employee directors for fiscal year 2006:

 
| Annual Board Retainer                            |   | $      | 15,000 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Audit Committee chair / lead director            |   | 20,000 |   |
| Compensation Committee chair                     |   | 5,000  |   |
| Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee  chair |   | 2,500  |   |

 

The company generally pays non-employee directors a fee of $500 foreach Board or committee meeting attended, and reimburses them for out-of-pocketexpenses of attending meetings.

 

----
Edgar B. FARMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3990

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Edison Electric Light and Power Company, Appellant.

*Taxation*— Exemption *—Manufacturing Corporations*— Act *of June*1, 1891.

Under the proviso in the revenue act of June 1,1891, P. L. 288, exempting manufacturing corporations from the state tax on capital stock, a corporation engaged in producing electricity, and selling it to customers for the generation of light, heat or power, is not exempt from taxation upon its capital stock.

Argued June 4, 1895.

Appeal, No. 25, May Term, 1895, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., September Term, 1894, No. 585, on verdict for plaintiff.

Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Affirmed.

Appeal from tax settlement. Before McPherson, J.

At the trial it appeared that the Edison Electric Power Company (of Erie) is a corporation chartered under the general corporation act of 1874 (P. L. 73), for the purpose, as expressed in its charter, of “ manufacturing electricity and supplying the same through appropriate conductors to the public for the purpose of light, heat and power, and supplying consumers with the necessary appliances for utilizing the same.”

The defendant company claimed that it was exempt from taxation upon its capital stock under the proviso in the act of June 1,1891, P. L. 238, which is as follows:

“ And provided further, That the provisions of this section shall not apply to the taxation of the capital stock of corporations, limited partnerships and joint-stock associations, organized exclusively for manufacturing purposes and actually carrying on manufacturing within the state, excepting companies engaged in the brewing or distilling of spirits or malt liquors and such as enjoy and exercise the right of eminent domain.”

The court directed a verdict for plaintiff subject to the question of law reserved whether the company was exempt from taxation. Subsequently in an opinion by McPherson, J., the court entered judgment upon the verdict in favor of the commonwealth.

*232
      *Error assigned*was entry of judgment for commonwealth.

*M. E.*Olmsted, *George A. Allen*and *L. Rosenzweig*with him, for appellant,

cited: Act of June 8, 1893, P. L. 353; Beggs v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co., 96 Ala. 295; People v. Wemple, 117 N. Y. 136.

*John P. Elkin,*deputjr attorney general, *Henry O. McCormick,*attorney general, with him, for appellee,

cited: Com. v. Edison Electric Light Co., 145 Pa. 131.

July 18, 1895:

Per Curiam,

The question in this case is substantially the same as that in Commonwealth v. Northern Electric Light and Power Company, reported in 145 Pa. 105. For reasons given in that case the judgment in this case should not be disturbed. We find nothing in the record that requires special notice. 0

Judgment affirmed.
Esteban MATA and Candida Mata, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. REAL WAVE LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 09, 2017

ORDERED that appellants' notice of voluntary dismissal is recognized by the Court, and this appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida is hereby dismissed.
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 16 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 

Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, and the Italian Republic of certain 

defense articles and services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2021 

Mr. MEEKS (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. LIEU, Mr. 

KHANNA, Ms. LEE of California, and Mr. MCGOVERN) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed 

transfer to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United 

Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the 

Kingdom of Spain, and the Italian Republic of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of a manufacturing license, technical 

4 assistance license, or export license with respect to any 

5 of the following proposed agreements or transfers to the 

6 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom of Great 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 16 IH 

1 Britain and Northern Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, and 

2 the Italian Republic is prohibited: 

3 (1) The transfer of the following defense arti4 cles, including defense services and technical data, 

5 described in Transmittal No. 19–105, submitted to 

6 Congress pursuant to subsections (c) and (d) of sec7 tion 36 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

8 2776): 

9 (A) Assembly, design, development, inter10 mediate level maintenance, manufacture, modi11 fication, operation, repair, testing, and demili12 tarization of components for and full systems of 

13 Paveway II, Enhanced Paveway II, Paveway 

14 III, Enhanced Paveway III, and Paveway IV 

15 Weapons Systems for the Royal Saudi Air 

16 Force F–15, Tornado, and Eurofighter Ty17 phoon aircraft. 

18 (B) The transfer of 7,500 additional full19 up-rounds of Paveway IV to Saudi Arabia. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-947]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Siegfried USA, LLC. has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before April 1, 2022 Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before April 1, 2022.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on December 8, 2021, Siegfried USA, LLC., 33 Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070-3244, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid
2010
IDihydromorphine
9145
IHydromorphinol
9301
IAmphetamine
1100
IILisdexamfetamine
1205
IIMethylphenidate
1724
IIAmobarbital
2125
IIPentobarbital
2270
IISecobarbital
2315
IIPhenylacetone
8501
IICodeine
9050
IIOxycodone
9143
IIHydromorphone
9150
IIHydrocodone
9193
IIMethadone
9250
IIMethadone intermediate
9254
IIMorphine
9300
IIOripavine
9330
IIThebaine
9333
IIOpium tincture
9630
IIOxymorphone
9652
IITapentadol
9780
II
 The company plans to manufacture the above-listed controlled substance in bulk for development of a new active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and validation for a Drug Master File submission to the Food and Drug Administration. No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. Brian S. Besser, Acting Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2022-01816 Filed 1-28-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William P. Moffitt, as President and
Chief Executive Officer and Lorin J. Randall as Senior Vice President of Finance,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of i-STAT Corporation (the Company),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          the Companys Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATE:
August 12, 2003

/s/ William P. Moffitt    _________________



William P. Moffitt              
                                                     President and Chief            Executive Officer

/s/ Lorin J. Randall    _________________



Lorin J. Randall                  
                                                     Senior Vice President         of Finance,
                                                     Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

(A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
i-STAT Corporation and will be retained by i-STAT Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
EXHIBIT 10.89


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                               (Term Loan Funding)


$50,000,000.00                                    Effective Date:  June 24, 1997


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  VILLAGE FARMS  INTERNATIONAL  FINANCE  ASSOCIATION,  a
Delaware  corporation  ("Maker"),  promises  to pay to the order of COBANK,  ACB
("Payee" and "CoBank") at its office at 245 North Waco Street,  Wichita,  Kansas
67202, or such other place as Agent (as defined in the Credit  Agreement)  shall
direct in writing,  the principal sum of Fifty million Dollars  ($50,000,000.00)
or, if less,  the  amount  outstanding  under this Note for  Advances  for loans
pursuant to the Credit  Agreement (Term Loan Funding) dated as of June 24, 1997,
by and  between  CoBank  (for its own  benefit  as a lender and as agent for the
benefit  of the  present  and  future  Syndication  Parties  as named or defined
therein)  and Maker (as it may be amended  from time to time in the future,  the
"Credit  Agreement") and any Bank Debt related thereto.  This Note is issued and
delivered to Payee pursuant to the Credit Agreement.  All capitalized terms used
in this Note and not  otherwise  defined  herein shall have the same meanings as
set forth in the Credit Agreement.

     The unpaid  balance of this Note from time to time  outstanding  shall bear
interest as set forth in the Credit  Agreement.  Principal and interest shall be
payable as provided in the Credit Agreement.  This Note has been issued by Maker
to Payee  pursuant to the Credit  Agreement  and  reference  is made thereto for
specific  terms and  conditions  under which this Note is made and to which this
Note is subject.

     This Note is subject to  voluntary  prepayments  as set forth in the Credit
Agreement. Amounts repaid may not be reborrowed. Upon the occurrence of an Event
of Default, Maker agrees that Agent shall have all rights and remedies set forth
in the Credit Agreement, including without limitation the rights of acceleration
set forth in the Credit  Agreement.  In addition,  Agent shall have the right to
recover all costs of collection and  enforcement of this Note as provided in the
Credit Agreement.

     Maker  and any  endorser,  guarantor,  surety  or  assignor  hereby  waives
presentment  for  payment,  demand,  protest,  notice of protest,  and notice of
dishonor and  nonpayment of this Note,  and all defenses on the ground of delay,
suretyship,  impairment  of  collateral,  or of  extension  of time at or  after
maturity for the payment of this Note.

     This Note  shall be  governed  in all  respects  by the law of the State of
Colorado.


<PAGE>

                                            Maker:

                                            VILLAGE FARMS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE
                                            ASSOCIATION, a Delaware corporation


                                            By:  _____________________________
                                            Name:_____________________________
                                            Title:____________________________
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

January 24, 2005

The Board of Directors

Gentlemen:

As requested by the Board, I hereby resign as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of Applied Innovation Inc. (Applied), and any other offices I
may hold with Applied or any of its subsidiaries effective this date. The Board
has provided no reason why it has asked for my resignation.

I understand that this resignation will be treated as a termination without
cause by Applied and that I shall be entitled to the severance benefit provided
under Section 9(d) of my Employment Agreement dated February 23, 2004. I further
understand that the Board will consider my request for additional severance
benefits commensurate with other executives who have departed Applied in the
past several years.

Sincerely,


/s/ Michael P. Keegan
-----------------------------------------
Michael P. Keegan


Accepted and agreed to as of
January 24, 2005 by

Applied Innovation Inc.


/s/ William H. Largent
-----------------------------------------
By: William H. Largent
    President and Chief Executive Officer
Amendment to Severance Agreement between the Registrant and A. Todd Shytle



 Exhibit 10.17 
 AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT, dated as of March 4,
2009, modifies the terms and conditions of the SEVERANCE AGREEMENT between I-many, Inc. (the “Company”) and A. Todd Shytle (“Executive”), dated as of December 5, 2006 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but
not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. Any term or condition of the Agreement in conflict with the terms or conditions of this Amendment shall be deemed to be specifically and
expressly superseded by the provisions hereof. 
 A. The second sentence of Section 2.1(a)(ii) of the Agreement (“If
Executive’s employment is terminated ... for a total of twelve (12) months”) is hereby deleted in its entirety. 
 B.
Change of Control Bonus. 
 1. For all purposes of this Agreement, a “Change in Control” is defined as the
consummation of any of the following transactions: (i) any merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto representing immediately thereafter (either by remaining outstanding
or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving or acquiring entity) less than a majority of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving or acquiring entity outstanding immediately after such
merger or consolidation; (ii) any sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (iii) the complete liquidation of the Company. 
 2. No later than 60 days following a Change in Control of the Company, the Company shall pay Executive a lump-sum amount equal to six
(6) months of Executive’s annualized base salary (excluding bonuses) in effect as of the date of the Change in Control, less applicable deductions and withholdings (the “Change in Control Bonus”). In the event the Company has
terminated Executive’s employment pursuant to subsection 2.1(a)(1), 2.1(a)(2), 2.1(a)(3) or 2.1(a)(4) above within 90 days before the consummation of a Change in Control, Executive shall be entitled to the Change in Control Bonus
notwithstanding such employment termination, provided Executive has signed a general release of claims against the Company substantially in the form of the agreement and general release attached at Exhibit A (except that Executive shall not be
required to release the Company from claims for payment of the Change in Control Bonus before it has been paid). 
 C. All other terms of the
Agreement shall remain unmodified by this Amendment. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Amendment to be executed in
duplicate originals. 
  

							
	 I-MANY, INC.
	  		  	EXECUTIVE
				
	By:	 	 /s/    JOHN A.
RADE        
	  		  	 /s/    A. TODD
SHYTLE        

		 	John A. Rade	  		  	A. Todd Shytle
		 	Chief Executive Officer
EX PARTE Frances HOLT

(In re: Frances Holt v. Michael C. Niemeyer, Staci G. Niemeyer, Carlton Niemeyer, Judy Niemeyer, Ashurst & Niemeyer, LLC, and Murray Thames Contractor, Inc. )

2160338

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to the Sup. Ct. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
EX PARTE CERTIFIED AUTO SALES OF CHILTON COUNTY, LLC, and John Carpenter

(In re: Frances Black v. John Carpenter and Certified Auto Sales of Chilton County, LLC )

2160339

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to the Sup. Ct. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Anne Wehle ABOFF and Jonathan F. Wehle, as guardians for Susan U. Wehle, Appellants, v. PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and Christina S. Lavery, as trustee of the Christina S. Lavery Revocable Trust, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 2, 2012

Order 

October 2, 2012

144303(70)

MACOMB COUNTY, MACOMB COUNTY

ROAD COMMISSION, and 16TH JUDICIAL

CIRCUIT COURT,

Respondents-Appellants,

SC: 144303

v COA: 296416

MERC: 07-000083; 07-000086;

AFSCME COUNCIL 25 LOCALS 411 and 07-000087; 07-000115

893, INTERNATIONAL UNION UAW

LOCALS 412 and 889, and MICHIGAN

NURSES ASSOCIATION,

Charging Parties-Appellees. 

______________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Michigan Municipal League, the 

Michigan Townships Association, the Michigan Association of Counties and the State 

Bar Public Corporation Law Section for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is considered 

and it is granted.