alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                            TARGET THERAPEUTICS, INC.

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF

                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


      Target Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized
and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware,

      DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

      FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting duly
convened and held, adopted resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the
following amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation:

      RESOLVED: That Article FOURTH, Sections A and B of the Restated
      Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be and hereby are amended
      in their entirety, but Section C is to remain the same and not to be
      affected by this Amendment with its preferred shares to be included in the
      total authorized shares:

            FOURTH:     A.    The aggregate number of shares which this
                              corporation shall have authority to issue is one
                              hundred twenty-two million (122,000,000) shares
                              of capital stock with a par value of $.0025 per
                              share.

                        B.    Of such authorized shares, one hundred twenty
                              (120,000,000) shares shall be designated "Common
                              Stock," and have a par value of $.0025 per share.

      SECOND:  That the stockholders, at a meeting duly convened and held,
adopted the foregoing amendment in accordance with the provisions of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

      THIRD:  That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.



<PAGE>   2


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Target Therapeutics, Inc. has caused this Certificate
to be signed by Gary R. Bang, its President, and attested to by Michael W.
Hall, its Secretary, this 30th day of September, 1996.


                                    TARGET THERAPEUTICS, INC.



                                    By:   /s/  Gary R. Bang
                                       ----------------------------------
                                                  Gary R. Bang

                                    ATTEST:

                                    By:   /s/  Michael W. Hall
                                       ----------------------------------
                                                 Michael W. Hall













                                      -2-
### MINUTE ORDER VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUT I ON CONTROL BOARD CARMEN RAM I REZ, CO UN C IL MEMBER, C I TY OF OXNARD - CHA I R J O HN C
. ZARA G OZA , SUP E RVI S OR, COUNTY OF VENTURA - VI CE C HAIR STEVE B E NNETT , SUPERVISOR , CO UNTY OF V E NTURA

PETER C. FOY , SUP E RVISOR , C OUNTY OF V E NTURA KATHY I. LONG, SUP E RVISOR , COUNTY OF VEN T URA M I KE MORGAN, COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY OF CAMARILLO LINDA PARKS , SUP E RV I SOR, CO UN TY OF VENTURA DAVID POLLOCK, COUNCIL MEMB E R , CITY OF MOORPARK JONATHAN S H ARKEY , MAYOR , CITY OF PORT HU E NEME DOU G TUC KER , C OUN C I L MEMB E R , C I TY OF FILLMORE 

### June 

### 23,2015 at 

### 1:30 p .m. Public H ea r i n g Regard i ng Adoption of Propos e d Am e ndments t o Rul e 74
. 15
. 1 , Boilers , Steam Ge n e rators, and Pro cess He aters , from 1 Million BTU /HR up t o 5 Million BTU / HR ; Find the Adoption of Proposed Amendm e nts to Rul e 74.15.1 i s C at e gorically Ex e mpt from Ca liforn i a Env ir onmenta l Quality Act (C E QA); and Dire ct the A ir Pollution Control Officer, or His De s ig n ee to F il e a CEQA Notice of Exempt i on. (X) All Board Members are present , except for Board Members Pe ter C
. Foy , Kathy 

### I. Long , M ike M o rga n, and Dougl as T ucker. (X

) The Board h o lds a pub l ic h ea ri n g . (X) T he fo ll owin g pe rsons are h e ard : M ichae l Vill egas and Sta n Cow e n . (X} The following docum e nt is submitt e d to the Board for consideration : (X) PowerPoint Presenta t ion : Public Hea ri ng P r oposed Amendm e nt s to Rule 74
. 15
. 1 Bo i lers. Steam Generators
. and Process Heaters (1 to 5 MMBtu/hr )
. (X) U pon m oti on of Board M e m be r Zaragoza , seconded b y B oard Mem b e r Po ll o ck, and duly carri e d, t h e Board h e reby c l oses t he Publ i c Heari ng . ( X) Up on motion of Board Memb er Polloc k , seconded by Board M embe r Zarago za , and d u ly ca rried , t h e Board h e re by approves st aff reco mme n dat i ons as stated i n th e Bo a rd letter. I herehy certify thai the annexed inst1 urnent lo ; true nnd correct copy of the document whic! l h on file in this off1ce
.

Item #12 6/23/1 5
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Trustees 

Universal Health Realty Income Trust: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-143944 and 333-57815) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements(Nos. 333-81763, 333-60638 and 333-161330) on Form S-3 of Universal Health Realty Income Trust of our reports dated March 9, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Universal Health Realty Income Trust as of December 31,2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, the related financial statement schedule, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Universal Health Realty Income Trust. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 9, 2010
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 587 

Expressing support for the designation of May 17, 2020, as ‘‘DIPG Pediatric 

Brain Cancer Awareness Day’’ to raise awareness of and encourage 

research on diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma tumors and pediatric cancers 

in general. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2020 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. REED, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. CASEY, and Mr. 

BRAUN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 17, 2020, 

as ‘‘DIPG Pediatric Brain Cancer Awareness Day’’ to 

raise awareness of and encourage research on diffuse 

intrinsic pontine glioma tumors and pediatric cancers 

in general. 

Whereas diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (referred to in this 

preamble as ‘‘DIPG’’) tumors regularly affect 200 to 400 

children in the United States each year; 

Whereas brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related 

death among children; 

Whereas, during childhood, DIPG tumors are— 

(1) the second most common type of malignant 

brain tumor; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 587 ATS 

(2) the leading cause of pediatric brain cancer 

deaths; 

Whereas, with respect to a child who is diagnosed with a 

DIPG tumor and receives treatment for a DIPG tumor, 

the median amount of time that the child survives after 

diagnosis is only 9 months; 

Whereas, with respect to an individual who is diagnosed with 

a DIPG tumor, the rate of survival 5 years after diagnosis is approximately 2 percent; 

Whereas the average age at which a child is diagnosed with 

a DIPG tumor is between 5 and 9 years, resulting in a 

life expectancy approximately 70 years shorter than the 

average life expectancy in the United States; and 

Whereas the prognosis for children diagnosed with DIPG tumors has not improved over the past 40 years: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports— 

3 (A) designating May 17, 2020, as ‘‘DIPG 

4 Pediatric Brain Cancer Awareness Day’’; and 

5 (B) efforts to— 

6 (i) better understand diffuse intrinsic 

7 pontine glioma tumors; 

8 (ii) develop effective treatments for 

9 diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma tumors; 

10 and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 587 ATS 

1 (iii) provide comprehensive care for 

2 children with diffuse intrinsic pontine 

3 glioma tumors and their families; and 

4 (2) encourages all individuals in the United 

5 States to become more informed about— 

6 (A) diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma tu7 mors; 

8 (B) pediatric brain cancer in general; and 

9 (C) challenges relating to research on pedi10 atric cancers and ways to advance such re11 search. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Ralph Michael LEPISCOPO, Appellant.

No. 14723.

United States Court- of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 5, 1965.

Decided April 9, 1965.

Certiorari Denied May 17, 1965.

See 85 S.Ct. 1541.

Lewis P. Mitrano, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Barry D. Maurer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GANEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record reveals no error in the judgment reached in the District Court and, accordingly, this judgment will be affirmed.
K.C. v. SHELBY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160067

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Shelby Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28 (D), Ala. R.Juv.P.
#### People v Rood,

No. 91026;

Court of Appeals No. 119256.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
FLANDERS CORPORATION FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND
1997.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>              <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR            YEAR            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1998     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999     JAN-01-1998     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1998     DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                              824,220      13,672,685      35,454,580
<SECURITIES>                              0               0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                    29,510,546      27,222,375      21,175,241
<ALLOWANCES>                        487,321         551,725         380,566
<INVENTORY>                      25,901,700      25,518,804      16,520,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 66,191,882      70,321,597      76,251,708
<PP&E>                           84,093,408      75,159,028      57,407,239
<DEPRECIATION>                   18,839,580      14,069,608       9,646,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  169,950,716     167,780,194     145,880,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            20,770,480      22,350,019      21,071,223
<BONDS>                                   0               0               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0               0               0
<PREFERRED>                               0               0               0
<COMMON>                         89,809,530      90,102,881      91,995,493
<OTHER-SE>                       22,317,067      19,499,933      14,211,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    169,950,716     167,780,194     145,880,516
<SALES>                         171,392,281     154,764,804     131,898,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                171,392,281     154,764,804     131,898,603
<CGS>                           127,417,753     117,104,977      99,018,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    33,802,204      28,108,372      23,509,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0               0               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0               0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,257,157         574,950         751,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  10,173,607      10,991,386       9,849,686
<INCOME-TAX>                      4,670,682       4,450,079       3,751,399
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               5,502,925       6,541,307       6,098,287
<DISCONTINUED>                   (2,685,791)     (1,252,739)       (259,022)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0               0               0
<CHANGES>                                 0               0               0
<NET-INCOME>                      2,817,134       5,288,568       5,839,265
<EPS-BASIC>                            0.11            0.21            0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.11            0.20            0.27


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of United Retail Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended July 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), we, Raphael Benaroya, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and George R. Remeta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that based on our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                             | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/RAPHAEL BENAROYARaphael Benaroya
Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 7, 2005 | 
|                                                                             | 
|/s/GEORGE R. REMETAGeorge R. Remeta
Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 7, 2005 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     2nd Quarter 1999 10Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882288
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund IV
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,797
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                   657
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10
<PP&E>                                         118,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                 43,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 80,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,156
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     78,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   80,851
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,372
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (753)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF PTEK HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of PTEK Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Boland T. Jones, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Boland T. JonesBoland T. JonesChief Executive OfficerPTEK Holdings, Inc.May 10, 2004
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00140

- CR

RONNIE WILSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “ Motion To Dismiss Appeal. ” The motion

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this

motion, w e grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: May 3, 2012
Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 3 Filed: 07/19/18 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 3 Filed: 07/19/18 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 3 Filed: 07/19/18 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 5
#### FORD MOTOR CO. et al *v.*Lanell G. TRITT, Adm’x

5-4486

430 S. W. 2d 778

Opinion delivered September 3, 1968

[Original opinion delivered May 13, 1968.]

[Rehearing granted September 3, 1968]

Conley Byrd, Justice.

In our original consideration of this ease, *Ford Motor Co.*v. *Tritt, Admx.,*244 Ark. *890B883, 430 S. W. 2d 778 (1968), we reversed the judgment entered in favor of appellee because there was no evidence in the record to show that the defect in the rear axle of the pickup truck was the proximate cause of the collapse of the wheel attached to the huh thereof.

On rehearing appellee contends that this court should not reverse a casé because of the exclusion of admissible evidence that was excluded at the request of the party claiming that the record is insufficient for lack of such proof. For authority appellee cites *White*v. *Moffett,*108 Ark. 490, 158 S. W. 505 (1913), and *Western Union Telegraph Co.*v. *Hearn,*110 Ark. 176, 161 S. W. 1025 (1913).

In the *Western Union*case the telegraph company claimed that Mrs. Hearn’s cause of action should fail because she did not allege and prove that she gave notice to the company within sixty days of her intention to claim damages. This was required by the blank upon which the message was sent. After pointing out that Mrs. Hearn’s offer of proof to show compliance with the sixty-day stipulation had been excluded by Western Union’s objection, it was there held that a party can not on appeal take advantage of a defect in the proof that was brought about by a ruling of the court made at his own request.

To the same effect, see *Zainudin*v. *Meizel,*259 P. 2d 460, (Cal. Ct. App. 1953); *Pataray*v. *Lee Hing,*37 Hawaii 14 (1944); and *Union Pacific Ry. Co.*v. *Harris,*63 Fed. 800 (8th Cir. 1894). The reasoning behind the rule is stated in the *Union Pacific*case as follows:

> ‘ *‘...*The defendant will not be allowed to thus take advantage of his own wrong, or the errors of the court induced on his own motion, and then compel the plaintiff to suffer the consequences. Such a proceeding would be the merest trifling with the court. *891... If the rule were otherwise it would encourage and reward unfounded and groundless objections to the plaintiff’s evidence ...”

The record here shows that Dr. Cushman, except for an objection by appellants sustained by the trial court, would have testified that the wobble caused by the defective axle could ..have caused and would have caused the eventual breakdown of the wheel. The trial court, after examination upon voir dire, had ruled that Dr. Cushman was a competent expert to testify on the subject. We find that the exclusion of the proffered testimony was erroneous.

Under the authority of the *Western Union*and *White*cases, *supra,*it follows that the rehearing must be granted and the judgment of the lower court affirmed.
AFS-11-115-E February 24, 2011 Exemption No. 8839B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26739

Mr. David L. Jones Corporate Aviation Education Director

Aviation Institute of Maintenance

4455 South Boulevard Virginia Beach, VA 23452

Dear Mr. Jones:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8839, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated Decem ber 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of American Trans Air Training Corp. d.b.a. Aviation Institute of Maintenance (Aviation Institute) (operating under Air Agency Certificate USBT077S) for an extension of Exemption No. 8839, as amended. That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Aviation Institute to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following their successful completion of the general curriculum but before they meet the experience requirements of § 65.77.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register . The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aviation Institute.2



### Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8839, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.



### The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8839, as amended, to February 28, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8839 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8839.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards Service