alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  SpatiaLight,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned Officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to ss.  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  their
knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                             /s/ ROBERT A. OLINS
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Robert A. Olins
                                             Chief Executive Officer


                                             /s/ TIMOTHY DESCAMPS
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003
Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 1 of 12  PAGEID #: 1

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 2 of 12  PAGEID #: 2

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 3 of 12  PAGEID #: 3

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 4 of 12  PAGEID #: 4

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 5 of 12  PAGEID #: 5

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 6 of 12  PAGEID #: 6

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 7 of 12  PAGEID #: 7

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 8 of 12  PAGEID #: 8

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 9 of 12  PAGEID #: 9

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 10 of 12  PAGEID #: 10

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 11 of 12  PAGEID #: 11

Case: 1:18-cv-00450-MRB-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/03/18 Page: 12 of 12  PAGEID #: 12
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 12 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. NORMAN (for himself, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. BROOKS, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. JOYCE

of Pennsylvania, Mr. PERRY, Mr. BACON, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. 

RESCHENTHALER, Mr. BUDD, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. GOODEN of 

Texas, Mr. STEUBE, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. 

BISHOP of North Carolina, Mr. MURPHY of North Carolina, and Mr. 

JACKSON) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the number of terms that a Member 

of Congress may serve. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 12 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person who has served 3 terms as 

5 a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House 

6 of Representatives. For purposes of this section, the elec7 tion of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of Rep8 resentatives shall be included as 1 term in determining 

9 the number of terms that such person has served as a Rep10 resentative if the person fills the vacancy for more than 

11 1 year. 

12 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has served 2 terms as 

13 a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment to 

14 the Senate. For purposes of this section, the election or 

15 appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate 

16 shall be included as 1 term in determining the number 

17 of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the 

18 person fills the vacancy for more than 3 years. 

19 ‘‘SECTION 3. No term beginning before the date of 

20 the ratification of this article shall be taken into account 

21 in determining eligibility for election or appointment under 

22 this article.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 116 Filed 12/12/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 116 Filed 12/12/2005 Page 2 of 2
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0125

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM119AD

777-34A0191 --- 9/20/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.
Form Date: 03/05/2008
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- The Boeing Company Under Contract No. FA8107-06-C-0001 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60099

Karen L. Manos, Esq. Erin N. Rankin, Esq. Dhananjay S. Manthripragada, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq. Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

Trial Attorneys Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 1March 2017
DA YID D'ALESSANDRIS Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60099, Appeal ofThe Boeing Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          99,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,246,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 705,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,771,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,524,900
<BONDS>                                      2,050,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,197,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,771,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               171,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)
        

</TABLE>
#### Randy HALLMAN v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 85-153-C

706 S.W.2d 387

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 31, 1986

*455
      *Robert C. Marquen,*for appellant.

*Steve Clark,*Att’y Gen., by: *Theodore Holder,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant, Michael Hallman, and Arthur Dale Taylor were jointly charged with the murder of Ivey Jones. Michael Hallman was found guilty of second degree murder while Arthur Dale Taylor and appellant were found guilty of first degree murder. They appeal separately. Opinions in all three cases are handed down this date. Appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction. The argument is meritorious. We reverse and dismiss.

In January of 1984, the Crawford County Sheriff’s office was notified that two hunters had found a corpse in a rural area of the county. Investigation showed the corpse to be that of Ivey Jones. An autopsy showed that the victim died from two causes, blunt trauma to the left side of the head and four stab wounds through the back which pierced the right lung and the aorta. Investigation led to appellant, Michael Hallman, and Arthur Dale Taylor.

At trial, the in-custodial statements of each defendant were introduced into evidence after the names of the codefendants were deleted. *See Bruton*v. *United States,*391 U.S. 123 (1968); *Parker*v. *Randolph,*442 U.S. 62 (1979); and *Gammel*v. *State,*259 Ark. 96, 531 S.W.2d 474 (1976). The inculpatory statements of Michael Hallman and Arthur Dale Taylor make no mention of appellant. Appellant gave an exculpatory statement in which he said he only saw Michael Hallman and Arthur Dale Taylor as they drove by his mother’s house. He said he then walked over to Taylor’s mobile home where a fire was burning outside.

Regina McGrew testified that the three of them were together outside Taylor’s mobile home when Taylor burned his blood-soaked shirt in the fire. That is all of the evidence connecting appellant to the crime.

The foregoing does not constitute substantial evidence of the guilt of appellant. The substantial evidence necessary to support a conviction must be of sufficient force that it will, *456with reasonable certainty and precision, compel a conclusion one way or the other; it must force or induce the mind to pass beyond a suspicion or conjecture. *Wilson v. State,*277 Ark. 43, 639 S.W.2d 45 (1982). Because no substantial evidence of the guilt of appellant was introduced, we reverse and dismiss.

Purtle, J., not participating.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, John
Rossi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Garb Oil & Power Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Garb Oil & Power
Corporation.








Date:
      April 22, 2010
            By:
      /s/John
    RossiJohn
      Rossi, President and CEO,Financial
      and Accounting Officer







A signed original of the written
statements above required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
has been provided to Garb Oil & Power Corporation and will be retained by
Garb Oil & Power Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 The forgoing certifications are being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and they shall
not be considered filed as part of such report.
Exhibit 10(d)
Sample Modification Agreement between registrant and Associated Commercial
Corporation.  Aggregate amount of agreements $11,738,230.84






                          MODIFICATION AGREEMENT
                              (Direct Loan)


This Agreement is entered into on 07/07/00 by and between Associates
Commercial Corporation ("Secured Party") and OTR Express, Inc.("Debtor").

Debtor entered into a Security Agreement with Secured Party dated 10/07/99
(herein with all amendments thereto and any accompanying notes referred to as
the "Contract") which was executed by Debtor as evidence of and as security
for the payment of the amounts set forth therein.

Debtor has requested that Secured Party modify the terms of payment of the
unpaid principal balance of the Contract which Secured Party is willing to do
but only pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree
to modify the terms of payment of the unpaid balance of the Contract as
follows:

1.   The remaining unpaid principal balance under the Contract as of the date
hereof is $222,114.26.

2.   In addition to the payment of the unpaid principal balance in 1 above
Debtor promises and agrees to pay a refinance charge in the amount of
$52,517.00.

3.   Debtor promises and agrees to pay to Secured Party the total sum (1 plus
2 above) of $274,631.26 in 48 installments as follows:

     2 installments of $ 1,527.04 each commencing 8/7/00 followed by
     4 installments of $ 4,405.65 each commencing 10/07/00 followed by
     41 installments of 4,405.65 each commencing 3/07/01 followed by
     1 installment of $73,322.93 each commencing 8/07/04
     thereafter until paid, provided, however, that the final installment
     shall be in the amount of the remaining balance.

4.   Except as specifically modified hereby the terms and provisions of the
Contract shall remain in full force and effect.

Each of the parties hereto acknowledges receipt of a copy hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of
the date and year first above written.

ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION          DEBTOR:OTR Express Inc.


By:/s/ Jeff Trotter                        By:/s/ William P. Ward

Title: Vice President                      Title: President
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 130 Filed 10/26/2004 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 130 Filed 10/26/2004 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 130 Filed 10/26/2004 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 130 Filed 10/26/2004 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,235,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,758,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,103,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,348,000
<PP&E>                                     178,553,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (50,091,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             329,280,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,181,000
<BONDS>                                    200,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  76,573,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               329,280,000
<SALES>                                     12,335,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           111,922,000
<CGS>                                       14,331,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,114,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            53,693,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,261,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,429,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,266,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,695,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (2,939,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,634,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CASE NO. 3:18CR099
v. : ORDER

JAMAHL NEMIAH HAIRSTON EVANS, :

Defendant.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure and the request of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of

Ohio, that this case be dismissed without prejudice.

DATE: _- (+ g

(dx. Neue

HON. WALTER Hi. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 1 of 12  PAGEID #: 199

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 2 of 12  PAGEID #: 200

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 3 of 12  PAGEID #: 201

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 4 of 12  PAGEID #: 202

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 5 of 12  PAGEID #: 203

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 6 of 12  PAGEID #: 204

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 7 of 12  PAGEID #: 205

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 8 of 12  PAGEID #: 206

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 9 of 12  PAGEID #: 207

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 10 of 12  PAGEID #: 208

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 11 of 12  PAGEID #: 209

Case: 2:18-cv-00954-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 08/24/18 Page: 12 of 12  PAGEID #: 210
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, A. Bradley Gabbard, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2005                         /s/  A. Bradley Gabbard
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           A. Bradley Gabbard
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA * THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, * Plaintiff, * Civil Action No.: RDB-08-0946 v. * KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, * United States Department of Health and Human Services * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER For the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, it is this 19th day of April, 2010, ORDERED and ADJUDGED, that: 1. Plaintiff the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 14) is DENIED; 2. The Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 16) of Defendant Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, is GRANTED; 3. That judgment BE, and it hereby IS, entered in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff; 4. The Clerk of the Court transmit copies of this Order and accompanying Memorandum Opinion to the parties; and 5. The Clerk of Court CLOSE this case./s/____________ __ Richard D. Bennett United States District Judge
From: Chuck French [French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:57 PM

To: cortney_higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Ann Johnson; Mark Morris; Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov; Phil Mulrine; Robin 

Langdon; Tom Walton; Hancy, Cindy Wang; Erin Newman; Jan Tierney; Kelly Rimer; 

Marinshaw, Richard; Sara Ayres; Steve Fruh; Tim Benner

Subject: Re: EO 13563 Interagency Comments on Chromium RTR

Attachments: E.O.12866 CromiumElectroplatingSteelPickling 2060-AQ60P Promulgation-7-13-2012-

Interagency-comments-with-EPA-edits-8-8-12.docx; E.O.12866 

CromiumElectroplatingSteelPickling 2060-AQ60P Promulgation-8-8-2012-revisedclean.docx

Hi Cortney, 

Attached is a redline version of the preamble and rule showing how we incorporated and addressed the 

Interagency comments. One version is a marked up version with comment bubbles and shows track 

changes, the other file is a clean revised preamble and rule. 

Let me know if you have questions. 

Thanks. 

Chuck French 

Phone: 919-541-7912 

(See attached file: E.O.12866 CromiumElectroplatingSteelPickling 2060-AQ60P Promulgation-7-

13-2012-Interagency-comments-with-EPA-edits-8-8-12.docx)(See attached file: E.O.12866 

CromiumElectroplatingSteelPickling 2060-AQ60P Promulgation-8-8-2012-revised-clean.docx)