alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary Minutes of the

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)

Public Teleconference

July 16, 2012

10:00 am

– 1 :00 pm, Eastern Time

CASAC Members : Dr. Jon athan Samet, Chair

Dr. Kathie Weathers

Mr. George Allen

Dr. Christopher Frey

Dr. Ana Diez

- Roux

Purpose : To review the draft letter on the Integrated Science

Assessment for Lead (Second External Review Draft

– February 2012)

Designated

Federal Officer: Dr. Holly Stallworth, Designated Federal Officer (DFO)

Other EPA Staff: Aaron Y eo w, David Orlin, Lydia Wegman, D e ir dre

Murphy , John Vandenberg, Mary Ross, Ellen Kirrane,

Jennifer Richmond

- Bryant, Stephen McDow, Erin Hines,

Allen Davis, Molini P atel, David Svendsgaard, Meredith

Lassiter, Lisa Vinikoor

- Imler, Beth Owens, James Brown

Public : Linda Wilson, New York Attorney General’s Office

Webpage : The meeting agenda and the draft CASAC letter may be

found at the following URL:

http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/bf498bd32a1c7fdf85257242006dd6cb/14cb0a

9d99fecf0f852579b90059a8 f1!OpenDocument&Date=2012

- 07

- 16

MONDAY, JULY 16, 2012

Meeting Summary:

Dr. Stallworth convened the meeting and explained th at CASAC operate s under the

Federal Advisory Committee Act. Dr. Jonathan Samet , CASAC Chair, walked the

Committee through the letter and responses to charge questions page by page

. Dr.

Christopher Frey, Chair of the CASAC Lead Review Panel explained that the Panel

would like to see a 3 rd draft Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) primarily to focus on

changes requested in this le tter and specifically in Chapter 5 of the ISA on integratedhealth effects of lead exposure. Committee members agreed that referring to “mistakes”

in the letter and responses to charge questions should be toned down to refer to “errors”

or “incorrect inte rpretations.” Members also agreed to add a sentence urging EPA to use

a consistent terminology for at

- risk populations.

Dr. Samet said that he had minor editorial changes to the letter that he would forward to

the DFO.

Thus the letter was approved b y CASAC and the meeting was adjourned after 27

minutes

.

On Behalf of the Committee,

Respectfully Submitted,

Holly Stallworth, Ph.D. /s/

Designated Federal Officer

Certified as True:

Jonathan Samet, M.D. /s/

Chair, Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee

Sulfur Oxides Primary NAAQS Review Panel

NOTE AND DISCLAIMER: The minutes of this public meeting reflect diverse ideas and

suggestions offered by committee members during the course of deliberations within the

meeting. Such ideas, suggestions, and deliberations do not necessarily reflect definitive

consensus advice from the panel members. The reader is cautioned to not rely on the

minutes represent final, approved, consensus advice and recommendations offered to the

Agency. Such advice and recom mendations may be found in the final advisories,

commentaries, letters, or reports prepared and transmitted to the EPA Administrator

following the public meetings.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                        
                   US FACILITIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996
                                        
 
                           US Facilities Corporation
                             A Delaware Corporation

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                        
               100%                                           100%
<S>                                                 <C>  
USBenefits Insurance Services, Inc.                 US MedCare Review, Inc.
     A California Corporation                       An Illinois Corporation
                                                           (INACTIVE)
</TABLE> 
                                      100%
                            USF RE INSURANCE COMPANY
                          A Massachusetts Corporation

                                      100%
                               US Holdings, Inc.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                                        
                                      100%
                             USF Insurance Company
                           A Pennsylvania Corporation
exv10w47









Exhibit 10.47




HEALTH FITNESS CORPORATION

COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009




     The Health Fitness Corporation Board of Directors approved the 2009 fiscal year base salaries
for the executive officers as set forth below. In addition, these executive officers may
participate in the Company’s 401(k) plan, employee stock purchase plan and medical and disability
plans, as well as other compensatory plans, contracts and arrangements. The Company also pays for
the Chief Executive Officer’s commuting expenses from his home state to the Company’s headquarters
in Minnesota and his living and commuting expenses in Minnesota.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Employee	 	Title	 	Salary
	Gregg O. Lehman, Ph.D.

	 	Chief Executive Officer and President
	 	$	345,874	 
	Wesley W. Winnekins

	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	203,449	 
	Jeanne C. Crawford

	 	Chief Human Resources Officer
	 	$	160,760	 
	John E. Griffin

	 	Chief Operations Officer
	 	$	221,450	 
	James O. Reynolds, M.D.

	 	Chief Medical Officer
	 	$	257,500	 
	Brian J. Gagne

	 	Senior Vice President-Account Management
	 	$	161,271	 
	John F. Ellis

	 	Chief Information Officer
	 	$	172,743	 
	Katherine M. Meacham

	 	Vice President Account Services
	 	$	145,523	 
	David T. Hurt

	 	Vice President Account Services
	 	$	138,102	 
	J. Mark McConnell

	 	Senior Vice President-Business and
Corporate Development
	 	$	230,000
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7058** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v.
RENED MARTINEZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 6:06

- cr - 00503

- MGL

- 2 ; 6:14

- cv - 00413

- MGL )

Submitted : November 18, 2014 Decided: November 21, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Rened Martinez , Appellant Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr. , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rened Martinez seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate o f appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martinez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### Fabian COSTILLO v. John GOODSON, Judge

CR 86-20

707 S.W.2d 776

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered April 28, 1986

Appellant, *pro se.*

No brief filed by respondent.

Per Curiam.

Petitioner was convicted on June 23, 1981 of aggravated robbery and sentenced to 75 years imprisonment. No appeal was taken. On June 19, 1984, petitioner filed in circuit court a *pro se*petition pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37 which is still pending despite the elapse of almost two years. Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court, seeking an Order to compel the circuit judge to act on his petition.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted. When our criminal case coordinator first contacted the circuit court about the pending petition, she was informed that the transcript was being prepared for the court to review. The delay in acting on the *640petition was attributed to problems with transcribing the record from a deceased court reporter’s file. In September, 1985, the trial judge informed the coordinator that the record had been completed and taken under review. The trial court responded to further inquiries in October, November and December, 1985, and January, 1986, that the record was still being reviewed. In mid-February, 1986, the court issued an order declaring Costillo indigent and providing him with a copy of the transcript. The order also indicated that at some point counsel had been appointed for Costillo. The prosecuting attorney was directed to turn over his files for counsel’s inspection, and counsel was directed to examine the prosecutor’s file and the transcript and request a hearing date as soon as his investigation was complete. As of the date of this opinion, the trial court has not notified this court that a hearing has been set.

Since it has been more than two years since the date the Rule 37 petition was filed and more than six months since the record was taken under review, we find that the trial court has had ample time to rule on the Rule 37 petition, or at the least, schedule a hearing. Therefore, the court is directed to hold a hearing on the petition within thirty days and issue an order within fourteen days thereafter.

Petition granted,

Purtle, J., not participating.
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 83 Filed 04/12/2004 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 83 Filed 04/12/2004 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

John P. McLaughlin, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Christine R. Larson, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, of PDL BioPharma, Inc. (the Registrant), each hereby certifies in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on his or her
knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of the Registrant, to which this certification is
attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: July 30, 2009



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/    John P. McLaughlin                 
|John P. McLaughlin                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer     
|(Principal Executive Officer)             
|                                          
|/s/    Christine R. Larson                
|Christine R. Larson                       
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       7,049,771
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  428,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,477,771
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,477,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,594,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,883,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,477,771
<SALES>                                     11,878,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,878,555
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,572,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,290,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,057,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,057,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,057,294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.09


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13


                            Gary Player Direct, Inc.
                             710 Aerovista, Suite B
                            San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

                                November 11, 1999


VIA FACSIMILE:  561-624-0304

Mr. Marc B. Player
Gary Player Group, Inc.
3930 RCA Boulevard
Suite 3001
Palm Beach, Florida  33410

         RE:      AMENDMENT TO DIRECT MARKETING AGREEMENT

Dear Marc:

                  This letter relates to the letter amendment dated of November
9, 1999 to the Direct Marketing Agreement dated as of the 1st day of November,
1996 (the "Direct Marketing Agreement"). Notwithstanding paragraph 4 of the
letter amendment, it is intended that GPGE shall have the right to terminate the
Direct Marketing Agreement under Section 16(c) for failure to meet the Minimum
Sales Requirement. However, for purposes of that subsection, the first Royalty
Year shall be deemed to commence on January 1, 2000. Thus, GPGE may not
terminate the Agreement unless the Company fails to meet the Minimum Sales
Requirement for both 2000 and 2001, or any two consecutive years thereafter.

         If the above meets with your approval, kindly execute where indicated
below and return to me by facsimile and regular mail.

                                               Sincerely,

                                               /s/ Thomas P. Gallagher

                                               Thomas P. Gallagher, Chairman of
                                               the Board of Directors


Agreed and Accepted:

GARY PLAYER GROUP, INC.


By: /s/ Marc B. Player
    ----------------------
        Marc B. Player
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  information   extracted  from  the  Company's
Consolidated  Balance  Sheet as of April 4, 1999 and  Consolidated  Statement of
Operations  for the  Thirteen  Weeks Ended April 4, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 APR-04-1999
<CASH>                                               660  
<SECURITIES>                                           0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                      5,567  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         678  
<INVENTORY>                                        9,104  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  18,193  
<PP&E>                                            71,393  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     7,446  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    97,793  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            100,266  
<BONDS>                                            1,027  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0  
<PREFERRED>                                            0  
<COMMON>                                             126  
<OTHER-SE>                                       (5,917)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      97,793  
<SALES>                                           18,264  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  18,264  
<CGS>                                             12,839  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     12,839  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   3,630  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      81  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,671  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (789)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                           3  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (792)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0  
<CHANGES>                                              0  
<NET-INCOME>                                       (730)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.06)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.06)  
                                                          
                                               

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 42 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 42

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that a new State may only be admitted into the Union upon a 
             vote of two-thirds of each House of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2021

  Mr. McClintock (for himself, Mrs. Hinson, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. 
 Rice of South Carolina, and Mr. Duncan) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that a new State may only be admitted into the Union upon a 
             vote of two-thirds of each House of Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``A new State may only be admitted into the Union upon a vote of 
two-thirds of each House of Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                          11,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     46,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,651
<PP&E>                                         115,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,801
<BONDS>                                         11,104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,421
<SALES>                                         87,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,022
<CGS>                                           68,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,589)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 1 of 10  PAGEID #: 50

Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 2 of 10  PAGEID #: 51

Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 3 of 10  PAGEID #: 52

Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 4 of 10  PAGEID #: 53

Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 5 of 10  PAGEID #: 54

Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 6 of 10  PAGEID #: 55

Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 7 of 10  PAGEID #: 56

Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 8 of 10  PAGEID #: 57

Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 9 of 10  PAGEID #: 58

Case: 1:18-cv-00541-TSB Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/03/18 Page: 10 of 10  PAGEID #: 59
- 1 - A lexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005 202.842.4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

May 3, 2012

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Delta Air Lines, Inc. China Frequency Return Notice DOT-OST-2007-28567

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) hereby returns to the Department the seven (7) U.S.-China frequencies granted by Order 2007-9-25 in Docket DOT-OST-2007-28567 (formerly used for Atlanta-Shanghai service). Delta continues to hold 40 U.S.-China frequencies.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der BellenCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing has been served this 3 rd day of May, 2012, upon the following persons via email:

carl.nelson@aa.com

dan.weiss@united.com jonathan.linde@united.com oracio.marquez@united.com howard.kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com keith.glatz@dot.gov

info@airlineinfo.com
#### People v Seefeld,

No. 90951;

Court of Appeals No. 119751.