alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. FERNANDO TELLO,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 50383
D.C. No. 3:16

- cr - 00987

- LAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 26, 2017 **
Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Fernando Tello appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the
72

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 29 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 50383

Tello c ontends that the district court erred by denying him a minor role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). We review a district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo and its application of the Guidelines to the facts of the case
for abuse of discre tion. See United States v. Gasca

- Ruiz , 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The record reflects that, at Tello’s request, the district court considered his culpability relative to three other participants in the offense. Tello
did not ask the court to consider the culpability of additional possible participants, and in the absence of such a request or any evidence of the existence of additional participants, the court was not required to do so. See United States v. Rojas

Millan , 234 F.3d 464, 473

- 74 (9th Cir. 2000) (district court should consider the
invo lvement of “other likely actors ” if it finds “sufficient evidence of their existence and participation in the overall scheme”). Moreover, the court did not refuse to consider the individual identified as “El Campo,” but rather concluded that this individual was not an “average participant” to whom Tello should be compared. See United States v. Hurtado , 760 F.3d 1065, 1069 (9th Cir. 2014) (“ The requisite comparison is to average participants, not above

- average participants. ” ) , overruled on other grounds by
Gasca

- Ruiz , 852 F.3d at 11 74

. Finally, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it considered the factors enumerated in the amended commentary to section 3B1.2 and concluded3 16

- 50383

that, in light of the facts of this case, Tello failed to meet the standard for a minor
role reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C)

. AFFIRMED.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03579

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03579\03579_Checklist_102910_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03579\03579_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03579\03579_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03579\03579_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03579\03579_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03579\03579_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03579\Certification Statement Plant ID 03579.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03579\Supplemental Documents\Fort St Vrain 03579 A5-3.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03579\Supplemental Documents\Fort St[1]. Vrain 003579 A7-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03579\Supplemental Documents\Fort St[1]. Vrain 03579 A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 94 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education 

relating to ‘‘Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection 

Criteria-Expanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools Program (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity Grants); Grants 

to Charter Management Organizations for the Replication and Expansion 

of High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to Charter 

School Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and for 

the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (Developer Grants)’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2022 

Mr. MOOLENAAR (for himself, Ms. FOXX, Mr. OWENS, Mrs. STEEL, Mr. JACOBS of New York, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Education relating to ‘‘Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection CriteriaExpanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools 

Program (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity 

Grants); Grants to Charter Management Organizations 

for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to Charter School 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 94 IH 

Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and 

for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (Developer Grants)’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Education relating to ‘‘Final Priorities, Re5 quirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria-Expanding 

6 Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools Program 

7 (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity Grants); 

8 Grants to Charter Management Organizations for the 

9 Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter 

10 Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to Charter School De11 velopers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and for 

12 the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter 

13 Schools (Developer Grants)’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 40406; pub14 lished July 6, 2022), and such rule shall have no force 

15 or effect. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 62 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the interim final rule of the Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration relating to ‘‘COVID–19 Vaccination and Testing; 

Emergency Temporary Standard’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2021 

Mr. GOSAR submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the interim final rule 

of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration 

relating to ‘‘COVID–19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the interim final rule sub4 mitted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administra5 tion relating to ‘‘COVID–19 Vaccination and Testing; 

6 Emergency Temporary Standard’’ (published at 86 Fed. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 62 IH 

1 Reg. 61402 (November 5, 2021)), and such rule shall have 

2 no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,372
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     82,103
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        450,969
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 560,648
<DEPOSITS>                                     421,144
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             18,405
<LONG-TERM>                                     66,008
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,140
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  55,091
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,884
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,282
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,166
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,215
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,999
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,167
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,562
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,936
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,936
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.49
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,602
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,343
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,199
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,023
<RECOVERIES>                                       107
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,845
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,845
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached
as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the
Report.
  By:
    /s/ Clinton H. SeversonClinton H. SeversonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,703,112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,768,112
<PP&E>                                         515,157
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,713,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          425,952
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,960
<OTHER-SE>                                (14,410,467)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,713,564
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,849,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,849,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,849,580)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1


                                   CONSENT


We have issued our reports dated March 15, 2002, except for the last
paragraph of Note H, as to which the date is April 4, 2002, accompanying
the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual
Report of Flanders Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the years
ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999. We hereby consent to the
incorporation of said reports in the Registration Statement of Flanders
Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31667, effective
July 21, 1997).



							                    /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



Salt Lake City, Utah
April 15, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                    NABORS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (In thousands, except ratio amounts)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Year Ended December 31,

                                                      2000          1999          1998
                                                  ----------    ----------    ----------
<S>                                               <C>           <C>           <C>
Pretax income                                     $  226,707    $   45,629    $  199,981

Add fixed charges as adjusted (from below)            37,655        31,165        16,040
                                                  ----------    ----------    ----------
        Earnings                                  $  264,362    $   76,794    $  216,021
                                                  ----------    ----------    ----------

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense:
        Interest on indebtedness                  $   28,122    $   30,088    $   14,974
        Capitalized                                    2,021           154         2,648
    Amortization of debt expense                       7,248           307           489
    Interest portion of rental expense                 2,285           770           577
                                                  ----------    ----------    ----------
    Fixed charges before adjustments                  39,676        31,319        18,688
    Less capitalized interest                         (2,021)         (154)       (2,648)
                                                  ----------    ----------    ----------

    Fixed charges as adjusted                     $   37,655    $   31,165    $   16,040
                                                  ----------    ----------    ----------

Ratio (earnings divided by fixed charges
     before adjustments)                                6.66          2.45         11.56
                                                  ----------    ----------    ----------
</TABLE>
NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU
1636 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON DC 20301-1636

JUN 2 7 2023

National Guard Bureau Equal Opportunity, Diversity, and Inclusion Statement

The National Guard Bureau is committed to providing a work environment that
exemplifies dignity, respect, and inclusion. Our employees will have the freedom to
compete on a fair and level playing field. We must embrace the principles of Equal
Employment Opportunity (EEO), diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility as we
recruit, develop, and retain a high-performing workforce that truly reflects the face of our
Nation as a whole.

We must ensure that no applicant for employment or employee of the National
Guard Bureau is denied equal opportunity based on race, color, religion, sex (including
pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), parental status, national origin, age,
disability, genetic information (family medical history), political affiliation, military service,
or other non-merit-based factors. These protections extend to all management
practices and decisions, including recruitment and hiring practices, appraisal systems,
promotions, training, and access to career development programs.

We must work diligently to maintain a workplace free from harassment and
discrimination. Employees and applicants for employment have the right to report
incidents of harassment or discrimination without fear of retaliation. Retaliation against
those who initiate discrimination complaints, serve as witnesses, or participate in
protected communication, is strictly prohibited.

Leaders, managers, and supervisors are responsible for creating an inclusive
work environment and will promptly respond to all allegation of harassment before it
becomes severe or pervasive. Any employee or applicant for employment who believes
he or she has been subject to, or has knowledge of, discriminatory or harassing
behavior should initiate an EEO complaint within 45 days of the event by contacting a
supervisor, Human Resources Office, or the NGB Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Office.

We all play an integral role and must remain vigilant in our efforts to eradicate
discrimination in the workplace. In doing so, we reaffirm our agency's commitment to
our organization's greatest strength and most valuable resource: our people. Always
Ready, Always There!

aniel R. PN earname—

General, U.S. Army
Chief, National Guard Bureau
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 D0 52 4 . GRADY ALLEN W I LCOX v . THE STATE.

Grad y Al l en W i l co x was co nv i ct ed o f s ev eral o ffen s es , i n cl u di n g p o s s es s i o n

o f m et h am

p het am i ne wi t h i n t en t t o di s t ri b u t e. Hi s co n v i ct i o ns were affi rm ed o n

ap p eal

. W

i l co x v. S t a t e , Cas e No

. A1 6 A1 2 9 8 (Au g u s t 1 8

, 2 0 16 ) (u n p u b l i s h ed ). He

s u b s eq u en t l y fi l ed a p ro s e “ Pet i t i o n to Fu l l an d Fai r Rev i ew o f Erro rs .” Th e t r i a l

co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t i o n , an d W i l co x fi l ed t h i s ap p eal

. W i t h o u t t h e s t am

p ed “ fi l ed ” co p y o f t h e o rd er, we can no t as cer t a i n i f t h e

ap p li cat io n was fi l ed w i t hi n 3 0 d ay s , w h i c h is a ju ri s d ict i on al req u i rem en t

. 1 See

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ); Bo yl e v. S t a t e , 19 0 G a. Ap p

. 7 3 4 ( 3 8 0 S E 2 d 5 7 ) (1 9 8 9 ).

Acco rd in g ly

, o n J u n e 2 6

, 20 18

, we o r d e r e d W i l co x t o s u pp l em en t h i s ap p l i cat i o n

wi t h i n t en d ay s wi t h a s t am p ed “ fi l ed ” co p y o f t h e o rd er t o b e ap p eal ed

. W e p ro v i d ed

t h at fai l u re t o co m

p l y wi t h t h i s d i rect i v e wo u l d res u l t in d i s m i s sal o f th e ap p l i cat i o n.

W i l co x h as n o t s u b m i t ted a s t am p ed “ fi led ” co p y o f th e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er, an d

m o re t h an t en d ay s h a v e p as s ed s i n ce o u r J un e 2 6

, 2 01 8

, o rd er. Acco rd i n g l y , W i lco x ’ s ap p l i cat i o n i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

1 Al t ho u g h th e o rd er i n cl u d ed wi t h t h e ap p l i cat i on d oes n o t co n t ai n a s t am p ed

“ fi l ed ” d at e, it was s i g n ed b y t h e ju d g e o n M a y 1 8

, 20 1 8

. Bas ed on t h at d at e, t h e
ap p li cat io n i s u n t i m el y

. July 16, 2018C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 07/16/2018
NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO HURRICANE KATRINA JOINT OPERATIONAL
AREA (LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, ALABAMA, AND FLORIDA) , 25 AUGUST - 30 SEPTEMBER 2005

50000
40000
30000
20000
10000

$0-das-0€
g0-das-6z
S0-das-gz
g0-das-£Z
g0-das-92
g0-das-¢z
 g0-das-pz
g0-das-€z
g0-das-7Z
S0-das-1Z
$0-das-0z
$0-das-6T
$0-das-gT
 g0-das-z1
g0-das-9T
$0-das-sT
$0-d38S- pT
$0-das-€T
$0-das-ZT
g0-das-TT
 g0-das-o1
S0-das-6
s0-das-g
S0-das-£
S0-das-9
$0-das-¢
s0-das-p
 g0-das-¢
g0-das-Z
g0-das-T
go-8ny-TE
S0-Bny-0€
g0-Bny-6Z
go-8ny-8z
 s0-Bnv-2z
g0-Bny-9Z
g0-Bny-Sz
Terence Lanar RUSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-495

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
FOR 375 YEARS,

THE BEST CITIZENS

HAVE MADE

THE BEST SOLDIERS.

NATIONALGUARD.com

“Like” the Guard on Facebook by taking a photo 

of the SnapTag and sending to 33218 or scanning 

the SnapTag with the SnapTag Reader.

Message and data rates may apply.

11146 ARG 24X36.indd 1 1146 ARG 24X36.indd 1 12/5/11 2/5/11