5432 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places, or vessels. 

V. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We view public participation as 

essential to effective rulemaking, and 

will consider all comments and material 

received during the comment period. 

Your comment can help shape the 

outcome of this rulemaking. If you 

submit a comment, please include the 

docket number for this rulemaking, 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. 

Submitting comments. We encourage 

you to submit comments through the 

Federal Decision Making Portal at 

https://www.regulations.gov. To do so, 

go to https://www.regulations.gov, type 

USCG- 2021–0774 in the search box and 

click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this 

document in the Search Results column, 

and click on it. Then click on the 

Comment option. If you cannot submit 

your material by using https://

www.regulations.gov, call or email the 

person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this proposed rule 

for alternate instructions. 

Viewing material in docket. To view 

documents mentioned in this proposed 

rule as being available in the docket, 

find the docket as described in the 

previous paragraph, and then select 

‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the 

Document Type column. Public 

comments will also be placed in our 

online docket and can be viewed by 

following instructions on the https://

www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked 

Questions web page. We review all 

comments received, but we will only 

post comments that address the topic of 

the proposed rule. We may choose not 

to post off-topic, inappropriate, or 

duplicate comments that we receive. 

Personal information. We accept 

anonymous comments. Comments we 

post to https://www.regulations.gov will 

include any personal information you 

have provided. For more about privacy 

and submissions to the docket in 

response to this document, see DHS’s 

eRulemaking System of Records notice 

(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing 

to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 

NAVIGABLE WATERS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05– 

1. 

■ 2. Add § 100.1311 to read as follows: 

§ 100.1311 Special Local Regulation; 

Montlake Cut, Lake Washington, Seattle, 

Washington. 

(a) Regulated area. The regulations in 

this section apply to the following area: 

The navigable waters from Montlake Cut 

and Union Bay Reach between Portage 

Bay and Webster Point on Lake 

Washington in Seattle, from the 

southern corner of University of 

Washington Oceanography pier at 

47°38′57′′ N, 122°18′45′′ W thence south 

to 47°38′46′′ N, 122°18′45′′W, thence 

eastward to Webster Point Light 21 at 

47°38′51′′ N, 122°16′33′′ W, thence south 

to the SR520 bridge at 47°38′37′′ N, 

122°16′34′′ W. These coodinates are 

based on Nort American Datum 83 

(NAD 83). 

(b) Definitions. As used in this 

section— 

Designated representative means a 

Coast Guard Patrol Commander, 

including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty 

officer, or other officer operating a Coast 

Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and 

local officer designated by or assisting 

the Captain of the Port Sector Puget 

Sound (COTP) in the enforcement of the 

regulations in this section. 

Participant means all persons and 

vessels registered with the event 

sponsor as a participants in the race. 

Spectator means any vessel in the 

vicinity of a marine event with the 

primary purpose of witnessing the 

event. Spectator vessels can observe the 

marine event from one of the designated 

spectator areas. One area is located 

north of Union Bay Reach in Union Bay. 

The other is located in the area between 

the state route 520 bridge and south of 

Union Bay Reach. 

(c) Regulations. (1) All nonparticipants are prohibited from 

entering, transiting through, anchoring 

in, or remaining within the regulated 

area described in paragraph (a) of this 

section unless authorized by the COTP 

or their designated representative. 

(2) To seek permission to enter, 

contact the COTP or the COTP’s 

representative by calling the Sector 

Puget Sound Command Center at 206– 

217–6002. Those in the regulated area 

must comply with all lawful orders or 

directions given to them by the COTP or 

the designated representative. 

(3) The COTP will provide notice of 

the regulated area through advanced 

notice via broadcast notice to mariners, 

announcement in the local notice to 

mariners, and by on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced annually from 8 a.m. to 

12 a.m. on first Saturday of May. 

Dated: October 26, 2021. 

M.W. Bouboulis, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

Thirteenth Coast Guard District. 

Editorial note: This document was 

received for publication by the Office of the 

Federal Register on January 27, 2022. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01999 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Chapter III 

[Docket ID ED–2021–OSERS–0160] 

Proposed Priority—State Personnel 

Development Grants 

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services, Department of 

Education. 

ACTION: Proposed priority. 

SUMMARY: The Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services 

(OSERS) proposes a funding priority 

under the State Personnel Development 

Grants (SPDG) program, which assists 

States in reforming and improving their 

systems for personnel preparation and 

personnel development in order to 

improve results for children with 

disabilities. We take this action to focus 

attention on the need to improve results 

for children with disabilities and their 

families by supporting a comprehensive 

system of personnel development 

(CSPD) for the Individuals with 

Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C 

Grants for Infants and Families program. 

The Department may use the proposed 

priority for competitions in fiscal year 

(FY) 2022 and later years. 

DATES: We must receive your comments 

on or before March 3, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments 

through the Federal eRulemaking Portal 

or via postal mail, commercial delivery, 

or hand delivery. We will not accept 

comments by fax or by email or those 

submitted after the comment period. 

Please submit your comments only one 

time, in order to ensure that we do not 

receive duplicate copies. In addition, 

please include the Docket ID at the top 

of your comments. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

www.regulations.gov to submit your 

comments electronically. Information 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Proposed Rules 5433 

1www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/02/ 

13/2017-02895/applications-for-new-awards-statepersonnel-development-grants-spdg-program. 

on using Regulations.gov, including 

instructions for accessing agency 

documents, submitting comments, and 

viewing the docket, is available on the 

site under ‘‘Help.’’ 

Privacy Note: The Department’s 

policy is to make all comments received 

from members of the public available for 

public viewing in their entirety on the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

www.regulations.gov. Therefore, 

commenters should be careful to 

include in their comments only 

information that they wish to make 

publicly available. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Coffey, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, 

Room 5161, Potomac Center Plaza, 

Washington, DC 20202–5076. 

Telephone: (202) 245–6673. Email: 

Jennifer.Coffey@ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 

telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Invitation to Comment: We invite you 

to submit comments regarding the 

proposed priority. To ensure that your 

comments have maximum effect in 

developing the final priority, we urge 

you to comment only on the proposed 

priority. 

We invite you to assist us in 

complying with the specific 

requirements of Executive Orders 12866 

and 13563 and their overall requirement 

of reducing regulatory burden that 

might result from the proposed priority. 

Please let us know of any further ways 

we could reduce potential costs or 

increase potential benefits while 

preserving the effective and efficient 

administration of the program. 

During and after the comment period, 

you may inspect all public comments 

about the proposed priority by accessing 

Regulations.gov. You may also inspect 

the comments in person. Please contact 

the person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT to make 

arrangements to inspect the comments 

in person. 

Assistance to Individuals With 

Disabilities in Reviewing the 

Rulemaking Record: On request, we will 

provide an appropriate accommodation 

or auxiliary aid to an individual with a 

disability who needs assistance to 

review the comments or other 

documents in the public rulemaking 

record for the proposed priority. If you 

want to schedule an appointment for 

this type of accommodation or auxiliary 

aid, please contact the person listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Purpose of Program: The purpose of 

this program is to assist State 

educational agencies (SEAs) in 

reforming and improving their systems 

for personnel preparation and 

professional development in early 

intervention, educational, and transition 

services to improve results for children 

with disabilities. 

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1451– 

1455. 

Proposed Priority 

This notification contains one 

proposed priority. 

Supporting an IDEA Part C 

Comprehensive System of Personnel 

Development (CSPD). 

Background: The purpose of this 

proposed priority is to support further 

advancement of IDEA Part C CSPDs. Use 

of this proposed priority would allow 

the Department to award funds 

competitively to SEAs to provide to 

their State lead agencies (LAs) to further 

develop the IDEA Part C statewide 

CSPD systems outlined in section 

635(a)(8) of IDEA in accordance with 

the State plan under section 653 of 

IDEA and implement professional 

development activities that are 

authorized under the use of funds 

provisions under section 654 of IDEA. 

In order to be considered for a grant 

under this priority, if the SEA is not the 

State LA for IDEA Part C, an SEA shall 

establish a partnership, consistent with 

IDEA section 652(b)(1)(B), with the State 

LA, which is the State lead agency 

responsible for administering IDEA Part 

C, including the CSPD requirements. 

Note: To carry out the State plan 

under section 653 of IDEA, as described 

in its application, the SEA also may 

award contracts, subgrants, or both to 

other public and private entities, 

including, if appropriate, the State LA 

under Part C of IDEA. 

We intend for this proposed priority 

to supplement the SPDG statutory 

priority, published in the Federal 

Register on February 13, 2017 (82 FR 

10470),1 as well as other relevant 

statutory and regulatory priorities 

established by the Department. 

Specifically, all applicants must meet 

the statutory requirements in sections 

651 through 655 of the IDEA, 20 U.S.C. 

1451–1455. 

Proposed Priority: Projects designed 

to enable the State to meet the CSPD 

requirements of section 635(a)(8) and (9) 

of the IDEA. In order to be considered 

for a grant under this priority, if the SEA 

is not the State LA for IDEA Part C, an 

SEA shall establish a partnership, 

consistent with IDEA section 

652(b)(1)(B), with the State LA 

responsible for administering IDEA Part 

C. Consistent with IDEA section 

635(a)(8), the purpose of this priority is 

to help improve the capacity of States’ 

IDEA Part C personnel development, 

including the training of 

paraprofessionals and the training of 

primary referral sources with respect to 

the basic components of early 

intervention services available in the 

State. The CSPD must include: (1) 

Training personnel to implement 

innovative strategies and activities for 

the recruitment and retention of early 

education service providers; (2) 

Promoting the preparation of early 

intervention providers who are fully 

and appropriately qualified to provide 

early intervention services under this 

part; and (3) Training personnel to 

coordinate transition services for infants 

and toddlers with disabilities who are 

transitioning from an early intervention 

service program under Part C of the Act 

to a preschool program under section 

619 of the Act, Head Start, Early Head 

Start, an elementary school program 

under Part B of the Act, or another 

appropriate program. The IDEA Part C 

CSPD may also include, consistent with 

34 CFR 303.118(b): (1) Training 

personnel to work in rural and innercity areas; (2) Training personnel in the 

emotional and social development of 

young children; and (3) Training 

personnel to support families in 

participating fully in the development 

and implementation of the child’s 

Individualized Family Service Plan; and 

(4) Training personnel who provide 

services under this part using standards 

that are consistent with early learning 

personnel development standards 

funded under the State Advisory 

Council on Early Childhood Education 

and Care established under the Head 

Start Act, if applicable. The SEA must 

include in its State plan how it will 

partner with the State LA, if the SEA is 

not the State LA for IDEA Part C, to 

implement these aspects of the CSPD. 

The description of the partnership 

should indicate the amount and 

percentage of SPDG funding that will 

support implementation of the CSPD 

over the project period and how funding 

will complement current efforts and 

investments (Federal IDEA Part C 

appropriations and State and local 

funds) to implement the CSPD. The 

description should also describe the 

extent to which funds will be used on 

activities to increase and train personnel 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPS1
5434 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

2 If the provision requiring State IDEA Part C 

programs to develop an equity plan is enacted in 

the FY2022 appropriations, then projects must align 

their CSPD activities with State IDEA Part C equity 

plans, which are plans to support equitable access 

to and participation in Part C services in the State, 

particularly for populations that have been 

traditionally underrepresented in the program. 

working with infants and toddlers and 

their families that have historically been 

underserved by Part C.2

Types of Priorities: When inviting 

applications for a competition using one 

or more priorities, we designate the type 

of each priority as absolute, competitive 

preference, or invitational through a 

notice in the Federal Register. The 

effect of each type of priority follows: 

Absolute priority: Under an absolute 

priority, we consider only applications 

that meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(3)). 

Competitive preference priority: 

Under a competitive preference priority, 

we give competitive preference to an 

application by (1) awarding additional 

points, depending on the extent to 

which the application meets the priority 

(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting 

an application that meets the priority 

over an application of comparable merit 

that does not meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(2)(ii)). 

Invitational priority: Under an 

invitational priority, we are particularly 

interested in applications that meet the 

priority. However, we do not give an 

application that meets the priority a 

preference over other applications (34 

CFR 75.105(c)(1)). 

Final Priority: We will announce the 

final priority in a document in the 

Federal Register. We will determine the 

final priority after considering responses 

to this document and other information 

available to the Department. This 

document does not preclude us from 

proposing additional priorities, 

requirements, definitions, or selection 

criteria, subject to meeting applicable 

rulemaking requirements. 

Note: This document does not solicit 

applications. In any year in which we 

choose to use this proposed priority, we 

invite applications through a notice in 

the Federal Register. 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

Regulatory Impact Analysis 

Under Executive Order 12866, the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) determines whether this 

regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and, 

therefore, subject to the requirements of 

the Executive order and subject to 

review by OMB. Section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866 defines a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as an 

action likely to result in a rule that 

may— 

(1) Have an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more, or 

adversely affect a sector of the economy, 

productivity, competition, jobs, the 

environment, public health or safety, or 

State, local, or Tribal governments or 

communities in a material way (also 

referred to as an ‘‘economically 

significant’’ rule); 

(2) Create serious inconsistency or 

otherwise interfere with an action taken 

or planned by another agency; 

(3) Materially alter the budgetary 

impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, 

or loan programs or the rights and 

obligations of recipients thereof; or 

(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues 

arising out of legal mandates, the 

President’s priorities, or the principles 

stated in the Executive order. 

OMB has determined that this 

proposed regulatory action is not a 

significant regulatory action subject to 

review by OMB under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866. 

We have also reviewed this proposed 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

13563, which supplements and 

explicitly reaffirms the principles, 

structures, and definitions governing 

regulatory review established in 

Executive Order 12866. To the extent 

permitted by law, Executive Order 

13563 requires that an agency— 

(1) Propose or adopt regulations only 

upon a reasoned determination that 

their benefits justify their costs 

(recognizing that some benefits and 

costs are difficult to quantify); 

(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the 

least burden on society, consistent with 

obtaining regulatory objectives and 

taking into account—among other things 

and to the extent practicable—the costs 

of cumulative regulations; 

(3) In choosing among alternative 

regulatory approaches, select those 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety, 

and other advantages; distributive 

impacts; and equity); 

(4) To the extent feasible, specify 

performance objectives, rather than the 

behavior or manner of compliance a 

regulated entity must adopt; and 

(5) Identify and assess available 

alternatives to direct regulation, 

including economic incentives—such as 

user fees or marketable permits—to 

encourage the desired behavior, or 

provide information that enables the 

public to make choices. 

Executive Order 13563 also requires 

an agency ‘‘to use the best available 

techniques to quantify anticipated 

present and future benefits and costs as 

accurately as possible.’’ The Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs of 

OMB has emphasized that these 

techniques may include ‘‘identifying 

changing future compliance costs that 

might result from technological 

innovation or anticipated behavioral 

changes.’’ 

We are issuing this proposed priority 

only on a reasoned determination that 

its benefits would justify the costs. In 

choosing among alternative regulatory 

approaches, we selected the approach 

that maximizes net benefits. Based on 

the analysis that follows, the 

Department believes that this regulatory 

action is consistent with the principles 

in Executive Order 13563. 

The potential costs associated with 

this priority would be minimal, while 

the potential benefits are significant. 

The Department believes that this 

regulatory action does not impose 

significant costs on eligible entities. 

Participation in this program is 

voluntary, and the costs imposed on 

applicants by this regulatory action 

would be limited to paperwork burden 

related to preparing an application. The 

potential benefits of implementing the 

program would outweigh the costs 

incurred by applicants, and the costs of 

carrying out activities associated with 

the application will be paid for with 

program funds. For these reasons, we 

have determined that the costs of 

implementation will not be excessively 

burdensome for eligible applicants, 

including small entities. 

We also have determined that this 

regulatory action does not unduly 

interfere with State, local, and Tribal 

governments in the exercise of their 

governmental functions. 

In accordance with these Executive 

orders, the Department has assessed the 

potential costs and benefits, both 

quantitative and qualitative, of this 

regulatory action. The potential costs 

are those resulting from statutory 

requirements and those we have 

determined as necessary for 

administering the Department’s 

programs and activities. 

In addition, we have considered the 

potential benefits of this regulatory 

action and have noted these benefits in 

the background section of this 

document. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

The proposed priority contains 

information collection requirements that 

are approved by OMB under OMB 

control number 1820–0028; the 

proposed priority does not affect the 

currently approved data collection. 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Proposed Rules 5435 

Clarity of the Regulations 

Executive Order 12866 and the 

Presidential memorandum ‘‘Plain 

Language in Government Writing’’ 

require each agency to write regulations 

that are easy to understand. 

The Secretary invites comments on 

how to make the proposed priority 

easier to understand, including answers 

to questions such as the following: 

• Are the requirements in the 

proposed regulations clearly stated? 

• Do the proposed regulations contain 

technical terms or other wording that 

interferes with their clarity? 

• Does the format of the proposed 

regulations (grouping and order of 

sections, use of headings, paragraphing, 

etc.) aid or reduce their clarity? 

• Would the proposed regulations be 

easier to understand if we divided them 

into more (but shorter) sections? 

• Could the description of the 

proposed regulations in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this preamble be more helpful in 

making the proposed regulations easier 

to understand? If so, how? 

• What else could we do to make the 

proposed regulations easier to 

understand? 

To send any comments that concern 

how the Department could make these 

proposed regulations easier to 

understand, see the instructions in the 

ADDRESSES section. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Certification: The Secretary certifies that 

this proposed regulatory action would 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small 

entities. The U.S. Small Business 

Administration Size Standards define 

‘‘small entities’’ as for-profit or 

nonprofit institutions with total annual 

revenue below $7,000,000 or, if they are 

institutions controlled by small 

governmental jurisdictions (that are 

comprised of cities, counties, towns, 

townships, villages, school districts, or 

special districts), with a population of 

less than 50,000. 

Participation in the SPDG program is 

voluntary. In addition, the only eligible 

entities for this program are SEAs, 

which do not meet the definition of a 

small entity. For these reasons, the 

proposed priority would not impose any 

additional burden on small entities. 

We invite comments from small 

eligible entities as to whether they 

believe this proposed regulatory action 

would have a significant economic 

impact on them and, if so, request 

evidence to support that belief. 

Intergovernmental Review: This 

program is subject to Executive Order 

12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR 

part 79. One of the objectives of the 

Executive order is to foster an 

intergovernmental partnership and a 

strengthened federalism. The Executive 

order relies on processes developed by 

State and local governments for 

coordination and review of proposed 

Federal financial assistance. 

This document provides early 

notification of our specific plans and 

actions for this program. 

Accessible Format: On request to the 

program contact person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 

individuals with disabilities can obtain 

this document and a copy of the 

application package in an accessible 

format. The Department will provide the 

requestor with an accessible format that 

may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or 

text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 

file, braille, large print, audiotape, or 

compact disc, or other accessible format. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. You may access the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 

www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can 

view this document, as well as all other 

documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Portable Document Format 

(PDF). To use PDF you must have 

Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Katherine Neas, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Delegated the 

authority to perform the functions and duties 

of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of 

Special Education and Rehabilitative 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01802 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2021–0775; FRL–9330–01– 

R8] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Utah; 

Emissions Statement Rule and 

Nonattainment New Source Review 

Requirements for the 2015 8-Hour 

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard for the Uinta Basin, Northern 

Wasatch Front and Southern Wasatch 

Front Nonattainment Areas 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

state implementation plan (SIP) 

revisions submitted by the State of Utah. 

The revisions fulfill the emissions 

statement and nonattainment new 

source review (NNSR) requirements for 

the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient 

air quality standard (NAAQS) for the 

Uinta Basin, Northern Wasatch Front, 

and Southern Wasatch Front 

nonattainment areas (NAAs). Utah 

submitted an emissions statement rule 

revision and a separate NNSR 

certification to meet, in part, the 

nonattainment requirements for 

Marginal ozone NAAs under the 2015 8- 

hour ozone NAAQS. The State’s 

submission of the emissions statement 

rule revision also included revisions to 

emissions reporting requirements for 

stationary sources, which will be 

addressed in this proposed rule as well. 

The EPA is taking this action pursuant 

to sections 110, 172, and 182 of the 

Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before March 3, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– 

OAR–2021–0775, to the Federal 

Rulemaking Portal: https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from 

www.regulations.gov. The EPA may 

publish any comment received to its 

public docket. Do not submit 

electronically any information you 

consider to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPS1