alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND THE
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEP. 30,
1999 AND 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000882159
<NAME> DAW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,516
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (391)
<INVENTORY>                                        814
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,560
<PP&E>                                          14,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,244)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,463
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,956
<SALES>                                         34,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,893
<CGS>                                           32,495
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,032)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,887)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 97 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 97

   Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland 
   Security relating to ``Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2022

   Mr. Nehls (for himself, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, Mr. Gosar, Mr. 
Norman, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Buck, Mr. 
 Issa, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Babin, and Mr. Gohmert) submitted the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Disapproving of the rule submitted by the Department of Homeland 
   Security relating to ``Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Homeland Security relating to 
``Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility'' (87 Fed. Reg. 5547), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 80 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 80

  Commending the heroism of Olathe East High School Administrator Dr. 
Kaleb Stoppel and School Resource Officer Erik Clark in responding to a 
                     student armed with a firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2022

    Ms. Davids of Kansas (for herself, Mr. Mann, and Mr. LaTurner) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee 
  on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Commending the heroism of Olathe East High School Administrator Dr. 
Kaleb Stoppel and School Resource Officer Erik Clark in responding to a 
                     student armed with a firearm.

Whereas, on Friday, March 4, 2022, Olathe East High School Administrator Dr. 
        Kaleb Stoppel (in this preamble referred to as Dr. Stoppel) and School 
        Resource Officer Erik Clark (in this preamble referred to as Officer 
        Clark) were shot and wounded while engaging an armed student;
Whereas Dr. Stoppel's decision to remove the student from class and Officer 
        Clark's swift response to neutralize the shooter prevented the loss of 
        innocent lives at Olathe East High School;
Whereas Officer Clark has been a School Resource Officer at Olathe East High 
        School for 7 years and a law enforcement officer for 15 years; and
Whereas Dr. Stoppel has been the Assistant Principal and Athletic Director for 
        Olathe East High School for nearly 4 years and an educator for nearly 13 
        years: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) commends Administrator Dr. Kaleb Stoppel and School 
        Resource Officer Erik Clark for their heroic actions to protect 
        students and staff of Olathe East High School; and
            (2) recognizes Administrator Dr. Kaleb Stoppel and School 
        Resource Officer Erik Clark's years of dedication and service 
        to their community as an educator and a member of law 
        enforcement, respectively.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1000

<CAPTION>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                              0
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                   48489
<ALLOWANCES>                     2416
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                47050
<PP&E>                          10077
<DEPRECIATION>                   6179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  60765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           36976
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                          100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                      20420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    60765
<SALES>                         58328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                58328
<CGS>                           45510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   45510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 9346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  2924
<INCOME-TAX>                     1170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              1754
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                     1754
<EPS-BASIC>                     .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .19


</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**232 CA 14-02091** 
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF MIKE HAWLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Michael M. Mohun, A.J.), entered October 17, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul that part of the determination, following a tier III disciplinary hearing, finding that he violated inmate rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i] [weapon possession]). Supreme Court dismissed the petition, and we affirm. Although a directive of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision provides that an inmate removed from his or her cell for a search has the right to observe the search absent a determination that he or she presents a safety or security risk ( see Matter of Johnson v Fischer , 109 AD3d 1070, 1071), that directive is inapplicable here because petitioner was being examined in the prison hospital when his cell was searched, and he was therefore not “removed from his cell for the purpose of conducting the search” ( Matter of Williams v Goord , 270 AD2d 744, 745; see Matter of Horton v Annucci , 133 AD3d 1002, 1003; Matter of Nieves v Goord , 262 AD2d 1042, 1042). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the Hearing Officer properly denied his request to call a lieutenant as a witness because the lieutenant’s testimony “ ‘would have been either redundant or immaterial’ ” ( Matter of Jackson v Annucci , 122 AD3d 1288, 1288; see 7 NYCRR 254.5 [a]; Matter of Mullady v Bezio , 87 AD3d 765, 766). Petitioner’s further contention that it was improper for the hearing officer to address two misbehavior reports at one hearing is not preserved for our review because he did not raise it at**-2- 232 CA 14-02091** 

the hearing ( see Matter of Freeman v Selsky , 270 AD2d 547, 547; see generally Matter of Allah v Fischer , 118 AD3d 1507, 1507). In any event, “no law or regulation prohibits the review of two misbehavior reports in one disciplinary hearing” ( Freeman , 270 AD2d at 547; see Matter of Baker v Fischer , 96 AD3d 1334, 1334), and petitioner’s claim of prejudice is not supported by the record ( see generally Matter of Bramble v Mead , 242 AD2d 858, 859, lv denied 91 NY2d 803).

Entered: March 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          84,393
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               125,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    719,807
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          94,101
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            95,292
<LOANS>                                      2,865,779
<ALLOWANCE>                                     29,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,130,868
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,505,324
<SHORT-TERM>                                    78,105
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            157,933
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,061
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                     379,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,130,868
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                114,990
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               25,625
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,549
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               145,164
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              70,762
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,737
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           73,427
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  93
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 48,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,296
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,082
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.82
<LOANS-NON>                                     24,150
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,917
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                29,117
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,393
<RECOVERIES>                                       393
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               29,717
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            19,560
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         10,157
<FN>
<F1>EPS PRIMARY TAG REPRESENTS EPS BASIC
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending April 21, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
Leon Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Leon Moore
--------------------------------
Leon Moore
Chief Executive Officer
April 8, 2003

<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending April 21, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
Bob Marlowe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/  Bob Marlowe
-------------------------
Bob Marlowe
Chief Financial Officer
April 8, 2003
EXHIBIT 10
(p)


 


RCM
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


 


Compensation
Arrangements for Directors


 


Directors
who are RCM Technologies, Inc employees are not compensated for their services
as directors.


 


Non-employee
directors, except as set forth below, each receive $24,000 in annual
compensation for service on the Board, payable in equal monthly installments in
cash.


 


In
addition, each non-employee director receives $750 payable in cash for each
in-person meeting of the full Board attended by that director, and $300 for each
meeting of a committee (in excess of four meetings per year of that committee),
whether in-person or telephonic, attended by that director.


 


Norman
S. Berson, one of the non-employee directors, is of counsel to a law firm that
from time to time performs services for the Company. Fees paid by the Company
to this law firm are not significant or material. Nevertheless, Mr. Berson
has voluntarily declined to accept compensation for his service on the Board.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000797662
<NAME>                        Biorelease Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>               <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996       JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1995       JUL-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996       JUN-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000             1.000
<CASH>                                         1,200             13,521
<SECURITIES>                                   0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  563               150,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                 0
<INVENTORY>                                    27,679            30,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31,121            166,283
<PP&E>                                         41,270            39,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,230            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,807           457,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          249,858           367,731
<BONDS>                                        16,000            40,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                 0
<COMMON>                                       98,803            135,123
<OTHER-SE>                                     (351,588)         (85,516)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,807           457,813
<SALES>                                        21,705            44,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               75,653            257,420
<CGS>                                          3,103             4,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  318,170           554,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               188,551           1,026,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,530             6,194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (411,335)         (1,011,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                 463,440
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (411,335)         (1,474,972)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                 0
<CHANGES>                                      0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (411,335)         (1,474,972)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.05)             (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.05)             (.17)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                          PHYCOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

              Statement regarding computation of per share earnings

         Three months and nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1996

                  (In thousands, except for earnings per share)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED   NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                         SEPTEMBER 30,       SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                      -----------------    -----------------
                                                        1997      1996      1997      1996
                                                      -------    ------    ------    ------

<S>                                                   <C>         <C>      <C>       <C>   
Earnings per common share:

    Net earnings                                      $15,040     9,073    41,053    25,182
                                                      =======    ======    ======    ======

    Earnings per share                                $   .22       .15       .61       .42
                                                      =======    ======    ======    ======

    Weighted average common
         shares outstanding                            69,072    60,843    66,853    60,555
                                                      =======    ======    ======    ======

Earnings per common share, assuming full dilution:

    Net earnings                                      $15,040     9,073    41,053    25,182
                                                      =======    ======    ======    ======

    Earnings per share                                $   .22       .15       .61       .42
                                                      =======    ======    ======    ======

    Weighted average common
         shares outstanding                            75,006    67,380    72,694    66,325
                                                      =======    ======    ======    ======
</TABLE>


Note:      The convertible debentures were not included in the calculation of 
           the fully diluted earnings per share since the effect of inclusion 
           would be antidilutive.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Carmike Cinemas, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statements No. 333-121940, 333-102765, 333-102764, and 333-85194 on Form S-8 and No. 333-167383 on Form S-3 of our reports datedMarch 8, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Carmike Cinemas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Carmike Cinemas, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

*/s/* Deloitte &Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 8, 2011