alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000, AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND THE NOTES THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         142,927
<SECURITIES>                                   156,310
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               370,006
<PP&E>                                          91,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 911,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,531
<BONDS>                                        257,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                     456,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   911,664
<SALES>                                         67,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,779
<CGS>                                           14,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,458
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,458
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/15/19

Remand

 Southern District of Ohio

Michael D. Henderson

3:18-CV-172

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant; is REMANDED to the Social Security

Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration

Case
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

January 13, 2011

d0112

Order 

January 13, 2011

141439-40(137)(138)(139)

PATRICK McCARTHY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141439-40

COA: 293482; 293483 

Oakland CC: 2008-089426-NO;

EDWARD SOSNICK, WENDY L. POTTS, 2008-094425-NO

KEVIN M. OEFFNER, RICHARD M. LYNCH,

JEANNE STEMPIEN, KATHLEEN J.

McCANN, THOMAS J. RYAN, BARRY M.

GRANT, MICHAEL J. TALBOT, DIANE M.

GARRISON, NANCY J. DIEHL, RONALD F.

ROSE, NANCY J. GRANT, GOVERNOR OF

MICHIGAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

and JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 9, 

2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. The motions for an evidentiary hearing and for sanctions are 

DENIED.

MARY BETH KELLY, J., not participating.
Order entered July 3, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01493-CV

DARLENE C. AMRHEIN, Appellant

V.

PROSPERITY BANK, JO'EL DOE, KEENA CLIFTON, AND NAOMI THAMES,

Appellees

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-05352-2016

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s June 24, 2019 and June 25, 2019 notices informing the 

Court she has filed for bankruptcy and appellees’ June 26, 2019 response. Under Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 8.2, a bankruptcy suspends the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. However, 

under appellate rule 8.3, an appeal suspended by bankruptcy may proceed if federal law or the 

bankruptcy court permits it. See id. 8.3. As appellees note in their response, the Bankruptcy 

Code’s automatic stay, upon which appellate rule 8 is based, applies only to proceedings against 

the debtor. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1); Hearing Transcript, Supreme Court Advisory Committee 

4010 (Nov. 18, 1994), 5224 (Jan. 20, 1995). 
The underlying suit in this appeal was filed by appellant. Accordingly, the appeal will 

proceed. As appellant’s brief on the merits was due June 28, 2019 and has not yet been filed, we 

ORDER appellant to file her brief no later than August 2, 2019. We caution appellant that 

failure to comply may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
#### Comer *v.*Comer.

Opinion delivered March 17, 1930.

*343*Roy D. Campbell,*for appellant.

*W. J. Dungan*and *Jones $ Wharton,*for appellee.

*344Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant insists that the chancellor correctly held that the transaction, the deed and contract of sale, did not constitute a mortgage, but erred in holding that he had waived his right to declare a forfeiture of the contract and resume possession of the lands. The contention that the deed and contract of resale constituted a mortgage was not supported by clear, unequivocal and convincing testimony, as the law requires, and the chancellor correctly held that it did not constitute a mortgage. *Rushton*v. *McIlvcme,*88 Ark. 300; 114 S. W. 709; *American Mortgage Co.*v. *Williams,*103 Ark. 484, 145 S. W. 234; *Edioards*v. *Bond,*105 Ark. 314, 151 S. W. 243; *Henry*v. *Henry,*143 Ark. 607, 221 S. W. 481; *Mathews*v. *Stevens,*163 Ark. 157, 259 S. W. 736.

The court erred, however, in holding appellant had waived his right to declare a forfeiture of the contract by accepting benefits thereunder after his right to do so had accrued. Appellee failing* to perform the conditions of the contract and make the payments necessary for the repurchase of the lands in accordance Avith its terms, appellant had the right thereunder, also in accordance Avith its terms, to accept payments o>f the rent for the use of the lauds which AAmuld in no Avise be regarded a waiver of his claim of forfeiture of the right to purchase. *Ish*v. *Morgan. McRae & Co.,*48 Ark. 413, 3 S. W. 440; *Quertermous*v. *Hatfield,*54 Ark. 16, 14 S. W. 1096; *Haus*v. *Emerson,*75 Ark. 551, 87 S. W. 1027; *Carpenter*v. *Thornburn,*76 Ark. 578, 89 S W. 1047.

It is not claimed that the contract was not fairly entered into, did not express the intention of the parties or that there are grounds for reformation thereof. The testimonv is Anrtuallv undisputed that appellee, W. M. Comer, failed to perform his agreements to pav the installments of purchase money in accordance with the stipulations in the contract of sale and, ha.Au.ng failed to perform the conditions, was bound to the paAunent of rent under the terms of the contract. Having failed to meet. *345this contingency, plaintiff was entitled to the possession of the lands after giving notice to quit and judgment' for the rents due. The chancellor erred in holding otherwise, and the decree is reversed, and the cause will be remanded with directions to enter a decree in accordance with this opinion. It is so ordered.
# Hunt, Guillot and Associates, L.L.C.

Request	for	amendments	to	FAA	333	UAS	exemption

Exemption	No.	13949

Regulatory	Docket	No.	FAA‐2015‐3767

Brad Guinther

UAS Specialist

Hunt, Guillot and Associates, L.L.C.

318.255.6825

– Ext. 352

http://www.hga

‐ llc.com/

3/28/2016

To whom it may concern:Date: March 28, 2016

Re: Exemption No. 13949

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 3767

Hunt, Guillot and Associates, L.L.C. is requesting an amendment to their existing 333 exemption as listed

and described below. The purpose for the amendment is to be able to offer the services as listed in the

existing 333 exemption. The amendment will serve to increase the functionality and usefulness of UASs

and the increased functionality will serve to create safer working environments in the industries which

they are deployed.

1. Additional Aircraft

Hunt, Guillot and Associates, L.L.C. would like to add an additional UAS to the existing

exemption. The new craft is a quadrotor designed and manufactured by 3D Robotics.

Manufacturer: 3D Robotics

Model: IRIS+

Serial No.: IRS1515900003

The IRIS+ meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in the 333 exemption. The

proprietary pilot operating handbook and pre

‐ flight checklist will match the previously approved

documents listed in the existing 333 exemption.
Exhibit 10.3

         This Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2002,
between Raphael Benaroya (the "Employee") and UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.,
(the "Issuer").

         Whereas, the Employee is employed by the Issuer;

         Whereas, the Issuer holds a promissory note, dated November 30,
2001, issued by the Employee to the order of the Issuer in the principal
amount of $2,844,393.24 (the "Note");

         Whereas, the Employee is the sole owner, among other things, of
278,529 Units of the Issuer's stock (the "Purchased Shares");

         Whereas, the Employee wishes to sell and convey the Purchased
Shares to the Issuer in exchange for the cancellation of his Note (the
"Exchange"); and

         Whereas, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Issuer at a meeting held on July 1, 2002 authorized any officer of the
Issuer to consummate the Exchange.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. The Employee shall surrender to the Issuer for cancellation stock
certificates registered in his name representing 278,529 Units of the
Issuer's stock and shall deliver to the Issuer stock powers executed in
blank therefor.

2. The Units represented by the cancelled certificates shall become
treasury stock of the Issuer.

3. Each such Unit shall be deemed to have a value equal to the closing
price on the NASDAQ National Market on Friday, June 28, 2002, that is,
$10.50.

4. The value of such Units shall be set off against the outstanding
principal of and accrued interest on the Note as payment in full in lieu of
payment in cash.

5. The Note shall be cancelled by the Issuer and returned to the Employee.

6. The Employee represents and warrants to the Issuer that (i) he is the
sole owner of the Purchased Shares free and clear of liens and encumbrances
and (ii) no option, warrant or other right to purchase the Purchased Shares
is outstanding.

7. The Issuer represents to the Employee that it is the sole owner of the
Note free and clear of liens and encumbrances.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement in the City of
Rochelle Park, New Jersey, in the case of the Issuer by an officer
thereunto duly authorized.



/s/ Raphael Benaroya
____________________                        UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.
   Raphael Benaroya

                                            By: /s/ George R. Remeta
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Chief Administrative Officer
1 of 11ELECTRONICALLY FILED SEP 13, 2017 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT2 of 113 of 114 of 115 of 116 of 117 of 118 of 119 of 1110 of 1111 of 11
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of Manatron, Inc. (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the accounting period ended April 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

This Certificate is given pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and for no other purpose.

|Date:  July 24, 2006 | /s/ Paul R. Sylvester                      
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                     | Paul R. Sylvester
Chief Executive Officer  
|                     |                                            
|                     |                                            
|                     | /s/ G. William McKinzie                    
|                     | G. William McKinzie
President              
|                     |                                            
|                     |                                            
|                     | /s/ Krista L. Inosencio                    
|                     | Krista L. Inosencio
Chief Financial Officer
## NOTE: This order is nonprecedential l 

# 'ztate5 Court of Appeaty for 

# tbe ffeberat circuit

AQUEL RASHEED, 

## Claimant-Appellant,

v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS, 

## Respondent-Appellee.

2010-7087 Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 09-3758, Judge Ronald M. Holdaway.
ON MOTION

ORDER

## The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves without opposition to stay the briefing schedule in this appeal pending the United States Supreme Court's final disposition of 

## Henderson v. Shinseki, 2010 WL 752370 (U.S. June 28, 2010).RASHEED v. DVA 

### 2 Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion to stay the briefing schedule pending the Supreme Court's final disposition of Henderson is granted. The parties are directed to inform this court, within 14 days of the Supreme Court's final disposition of Henderson, concerning how they believe that this appeal should proceed. FOR THE COURT JUL 2 7 2111(1 Date Is! Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Michael D.J. Eisenberg, Esq. Meredyth Cohen Havasy, Esq. s20 ILED U.S. COUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUL 2 7 2010
JAN HORBALY CLERK
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 104 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising 

Shareholder Rights’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2022 

Mr. FINSTAD submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and Labor 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Labor relating to ‘‘Prudence and 

Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising 

Shareholder Rights’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Labor relating to ‘‘Prudence and Loyalty in 

5 Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 104 IH 

1 Rights’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 73822 (December 1, 2022)), and 

2 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 40 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 40

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2021

 Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Budd, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Mr. Buck, Mr. 
    Weber of Texas, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Gosar, Mr. 
    Gohmert, and Mr. Hice of Georgia) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine 
justices consisting of one chief justice and eight associate 
justices.''.
                                 <all>
```
APPENDIX F 

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 157-6 Filed: 01/18/19 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 7158
Appendix F

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT 

OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case No.: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB

Judge Timothy S. Black 

Judge Karen Nelson Moore 

Judge Michael H. Watson

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

INTERVENORS’ INITIAL WITNESS LIST

Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order regarding Cincinnati Civil Procedures, Intervenors 

identify the following witnesses who they may call to testify live at the trial in this matter: 

(1) The Honorable John Boehner 

c/o Squire Patton Boggs

201 E. Fourth Street, Suite 1900

Cincinnati, OH 45202

Mr. Boehner was the U.S. representative for Ohio’s 8th congressional district from 1991 

to 2015 and served as the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives from 2011 to 2015. Mr. 

Boehner may be called to testify regarding the 2011 Ohio congressional redistricting process and 

his involvement regarding the same.

(2) Thomas Brunell

The University of Texas at Dallas

800 W. Campbell Road

Richardson, TX 75080

Dr. Brunell is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Texas at Dallas. He will 

provide expert testimony as disclosed in his report.

Intervenors reserve the right to make use of and/or compel testimony from any of the 

individuals listed in Plaintiffs’ or Defendants’ initial witness lists. Intervenors reserve the right, to 

Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

Ryan Smith, Speaker of the Ohio House of 

Representatives, et al.,

Defendants.

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 157-6 Filed: 01/18/19 Page: 2 of 4 PAGEID #: 7159
the fullest extent permitted under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the orders of this Court, 

to supplement this list.

Dated: January 18, 2019 Respectfully submitted,

BAKERHOSTETLER LLP

/s/ Patrick T. Lewis

Patrick T. Lewis (0078314)

Trial Attorney

Email: plewis@bakerlaw.com

127 Public Square, Suite 2000

Cleveland, OH 44114-1214

(216) 621-0200 / Fax (216) 696-0740

Robert J. Tucker (0082205) 

Email: rtucker@bakerlaw.com

200 Civic Center Drive, Suite 1200

Columbus, OH 43215-4138

(614) 228-1541 / Fax (614) 462-2616

Katherine L. McKnight(*)

Email: kmcknight@bakerlaw.com

Richard B. Raile(*)

Email: rraile@bakerlaw.com

Washington Square, Suite 1100 

1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036-5403

(202) 861-1500 / Fax (202) 861-1783

(*) admitted pro hac vice

Counsel for Intervenors

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 157-6 Filed: 01/18/19 Page: 3 of 4 PAGEID #: 7160
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 157-6 Filed: 01/18/19 Page: 4 of 4 PAGEID #: 7161
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James W. Dorst, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1. Such quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: February 13, 2007

By: /s/ James W. Dorst
    -----------------------
    James W. Dorst
    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 4, 2017

No. 04-17-00358-CR

Cristian YEPEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CRN001641-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

Court reporter Ana Alcantar has filed a notification of late reporter’s record, requesting 

an extension to August 30, 2017. We GRANT her request and ORDER her to file the reporter’s 

record on or before August 30, 2017.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of August, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit 23**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-56975, 333-67441, 333-83561, 333-45710, 333-68322 and 333-96899 of Cost Plus, Inc. andsubsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated April 6, 2004, incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cost Plus, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended January 31, 2004. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

San Francisco, California 

April 13, 2004