alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

Calendar No. 24 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 50 

Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations in the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself and Mr. BLUNT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

FEBRUARY 13, 2019 

Reported by Mr. BLUNT, without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations 

in the Senate. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF NOMINATIONS. 

3 (a) LIMIT ON CONSIDERATION FOR CERTAIN NOMI4 NATIONS.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—If cloture is invoked on a 

6 nomination described in paragraph (2), there shall 

7 be no more than 2 hours of post-cloture considerVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:17 Feb 13, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR50.RS SR50

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 50 RS 

1 ation equally divided between the majority leader 

2 and the minority leader, or their designees. 

3 (2) NOMINATIONS COVERED.—A nomination 

4 described in this paragraph is a nomination of an in5 dividual to a position— 

6 (A) as a judge of a district court of the 

7 United States or of the United States Court of 

8 Federal Claims; or 

9 (B) in the executive branch that is not— 

10 (i) a position at level I of the Execu11 tive Schedule under section 5312 of title 5, 

12 United States Code; or 

13 (ii) a position as a member of— 

14 (I) the Equal Employment Op15 portunity Commission; 

16 (II) the Securities and Exchange 

17 Commission; 

18 (III) the Federal Election Com19 mission; 

20 (IV) the Federal Energy Regu21 latory Commission; 

22 (V) the Federal Trade Commis23 sion; 

24 (VI) the National Labor Rela25 tions Board; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 50 RS 

1 (VII) the Commodity Futures 

2 Trading Commission; 

3 (VIII) the Consumer Product 

4 Safety Commission; 

5 (IX) the Federal Communica6 tions Commission; 

7 (X) the Surface Transportation 

8 Board; 

9 (XI) the Nuclear Regulatory 

10 Commission; 

11 (XII) the Federal Deposit Insur12 ance Corporation; or 

13 (XIII) the Board of Governors of 

14 the Federal Reserve System. 

15 (b) DIVISION OF TIME ON OTHER NOMINATIONS.— 

16 If cloture is invoked on a nomination that is not described 

17 in subsection (a)(2), the period of post-cloture consider18 ation shall be equally divided between the majority leader 

19 and the minority leader, or their designees. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Calendar No. 24 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 50 

RESOLUTION 

Improving procedures for the consideration of 

nominations in the Senate. 

FEBRUARY 13, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.80


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2


TO


SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 2
(this “Amendment”), dated as of January 12, 2009, amends that
certain Severance Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into on April 4,
2008, by and between Force Protection, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”),
and Shelia Boyd (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, in order to correct a “scrivener’s error in
the language in Section 5 of the Agreement, the Company and the Executive
desire to enter into this Amendment to amend certain provisions of the
Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in
consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and agreements in the
Agreement and herein, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Capitalized Terms. 
Capitalized terms that are not defined in this Amendment shall have the
meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.


 


2.                                       Section 5 of the Agreement is amended in
its entirety to read as follows:


 


“5.            
Payments Upon Non-Qualifying Termination of
Employment.  If
the Executive’s employment with the Company shall terminate by reason of a
Nonqualifying Termination, then the Company shall pay to the Executive (or the
Executive’s beneficiary or estate) within thirty (30) days following the Date
of Termination, a lump-sum cash amount equal to the Accrued Amounts (other than
the amount described in Section 3(a)(ii) if the Executive is
terminated by the Company for Cause) and provide the Other Benefits.”


 


3.                                       Counterparts.  This
Amendment may be executed (including by facsimile transmission confirmed
promptly thereafter by actual delivery of executed counterparts) in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


4.                                       Governing Law.  This
Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with,
the internal laws of the State of South Carolina without regard to the
principle of conflicts of laws.


 


5.                                       Headings.  Section headings
are for convenience only and shall not be considered a part of this Amendment.


 

















 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company and the Executive have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed,
effective as of the date first written above.


 


 


	
   

  	
  FORCE
  PROTECTION, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Lenna Ruth Macdonald

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Lenna Ruth Macdonald

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Chief Strategy Officer, General
  Counsel & Corporate Secretary 

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Shelia Boyd

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Shelia Boyd

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  Vice President, Human Resources
#### Vinkle v Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company,

No. 90660;

*Leave to Appeal Denied September 13, 1991:*

Court of Appeals No. 113706.

Levin, J.

I would grant leave to appeal.
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 28 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to equal rights for men and women. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2021 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. REED, Ms. 

SPEIER, Ms. ADAMS, Mrs. AXNE, Mr. BERA, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. 

BOURDEAUX, Ms. BROWNLEY, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. 

CA ́RDENAS, Mr. CARSON, Mr. CASE, Ms. CHU, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. 

CLARK of Massachusetts, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. 

COOPER, Mr. COSTA, Mr. CROW, Ms. DEAN, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. 

DEGETTE, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. EVANS, 

Mrs. FLETCHER, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. GARAMENDI, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, 

Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. HORSFORD, 

Ms. HOULAHAN, Mr. HUFFMAN, Ms. JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON

of Georgia, Mr. JONES, Mr. KEATING, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. 

KILMER, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. 

LAWSON of Florida, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. LEVIN of California, Ms. 

LOFGREN, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. MANNING, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. MCNERNEY, 

Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MENG, Mr. MORELLE, Mr. MOULTON, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. NEGUSE, Ms. NEWMAN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. O’HALLERAN, Mr. 

PALLONE, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. 

QUIGLEY, Miss RICE of New York, Ms. ROSS, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. 

SARBANES, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. 

SCHRADER, Ms. SCHRIER, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Ms. SEWELL, 

Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. SHERRILL, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Ms. 

SPANBERGER, Ms. STEVENS, Mr. SWALWELL, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. TLAIB, 

Mrs. TORRES of California, Mr. TORRES of New York, Mrs. TRAHAN, 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. WEXTON, and Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 28 IH 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to equal rights for men and women. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 

9 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

10 ‘‘SECTION 1. Women shall have equal rights in the 

11 United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction. 

12 Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or 

13 abridged by the United States or by any State on account 

14 of sex. 

15 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress and the several States shall 

16 have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the 

17 provisions of this article. 

18 ‘‘SECTION 3. This amendment shall take effect two 

19 years after the date of ratification.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ascential Software Corporation

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of Ascential Software Corporation, (Nos. 333-98925, 333-87396, 333-01409,
33-11161, 33-22862, 333-31116, 33-31117, 333-31369, 33-31371, 33-50608, 33-50610, 33-56707,
333-61843, 333-70323, 333-89231, 333-31670, 333-43238, 333-108782 and 333-110970) on Form S-8 and
(No. 333-90667) on Form S-3 of Ascential Software Corporation of our report dated January 29, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of
Ascential Software Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Ascential Software Corporation.

Our
report refers to the Company's adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", effective January 1, 2002.

|                                     |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------
|Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2004 |  |             

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Brian Garrett, et al., 

Plaintiffs, Lead Action 2:18-cv-692

 

v. Judge Michael H. Watson 

 

The Ohio State University, Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers

Defendant.

ORDER

The Motion for a Status Conference filed by Plaintiffs in Snyder-Hill, et al. v. 

The Ohio State University, No. 2:18-cv-736; Khalil, et al. v. The Ohio State 

University, No. 2:19-cv-4902; Garrett, et al. v. The Ohio State University, No. 2:18-

cv-692; Chrystal, et al. v. The Ohio State University, No. 2:19-cv-5272; and John 

Does 85-88 v. The Ohio State University, No. 2:20-cv-1648 (ECF No. 152) is 

DENIED. The parties shall brief the issues raised by the Motion on an expedited 

basis with Defendant’s response due on May 12, 2020, and Plaintiffs’ reply due on 

May 15, 2020. The deadline for filing Amended Complaints in these cases is stayed 

pending the Court’s ruling on the issue raised in Plaintiffs’ Motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Michael H. Watson 

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

/s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 153 Filed: 05/06/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 915
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Registrant

Jurisdiction



|                                 |  |             |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | 
|73 Medical Building, LLC         |  | Connecticut |  | 
|Cypresswood Investments, L.P     |  | Georgia     |  | 
|Riverdale Realty, LLC            |  | Georgia     |  | 
|Sheffield Properties, LLC        |  | Georgia     |  | 
|Cimarron Medical Properties, LLC |  | Texas       |  | 
|Saratoga Hospital Properties, LP |  | Texas       |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                       182
<INVENTORY>                                      9,593
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,853
<PP&E>                                          48,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,858
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,568
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,427
<SALES>                                         55,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,118
<CGS>                                           43,853
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    602
<INCOME-TAX>                                       394
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (107)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lawrence M. Higby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ LAWRENCE M. HIGBY Lawrence M. Higby
Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.86

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                           (Construction Loan Funding)


$30,000,000.00                                    Effective Date:  June 24, 1997


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  VILLAGE FARMS  INTERNATIONAL  FINANCE  ASSOCIATION,  a
Delaware  corporation  ("Maker"),  promises  to pay to the order of COBANK,  ACB
("Payee" and "CoBank") at its office at 245 North Waco Street,  Wichita,  Kansas
67202, or such other place as Agent (as defined in the Credit  Agreement)  shall
direct in writing, the principal sum of Thirty million Dollars  ($30,000,000.00)
or, if less,  the  amount  outstanding  under this Note for  Advances  for loans
pursuant to the Credit  Agreement  (Construction  Loan Funding) dated as of June
24,  1997,  by and between  CoBank (for its own benefit as a lender and as agent
for the  benefit  of the  present  and  future  Syndication  Parties as named or
defined  therein)  and  Maker  (as it may be  amended  from  time to time in the
future, the "Credit Agreement") and any Bank Debt related thereto.  This Note is
issued and delivered to Payee pursuant to the Credit Agreement.  All capitalized
terms used in this Note and not  otherwise  defined  herein  shall have the same
meanings as set forth in the Credit Agreement.

     The unpaid  balance of this Note from time to time  outstanding  shall bear
interest as set forth in the Credit  Agreement.  Principal and interest shall be
payable as provided in the Credit Agreement.  This Note has been issued by Maker
to Payee  pursuant to the Credit  Agreement  and  reference  is made thereto for
specific  terms and  conditions  under which this Note is made and to which this
Note is subject.

     This Note is subject to  voluntary  prepayments  as set forth in the Credit
Agreement. Amounts repaid may not be reborrowed. Upon the occurrence of an Event
of Default, Maker agrees that Agent shall have all rights and remedies set forth
in the Credit Agreement, including without limitation the rights of acceleration
set forth in the Credit  Agreement.  In addition,  Agent shall have the right to
recover all costs of collection and  enforcement of this Note as provided in the
Credit Agreement.

     Maker  and any  endorser,  guarantor,  surety  or  assignor  hereby  waives
presentment  for  payment,  demand,  protest,  notice of protest,  and notice of
dishonor and  nonpayment of this Note,  and all defenses on the ground of delay,
suretyship,  impairment  of  collateral,  or of  extension  of time at or  after
maturity for the payment of this Note.

     This Note  shall be  governed  in all  respects  by the law of the State of
Colorado.

<PAGE>

                                            Maker:

                                            VILLAGE FARMS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE
                                            ASSOCIATION, a Delaware corporation


                                            By:  _______________________________
                                            Name:_______________________________
                                            Title:______________________________


                                       2
#### Sisk *v.*Poinsett Lumber & Manufacturing Company.

4-2763

Opinion delivered December 5, 1932.

*C. T. Carpenter,*for appellant.

*Lamb*<& *Adams,*for appellee.

*589Humphreys, J.

Appellant brought suit in the circuit court of Poinsett County against appellees to recover damages for the benefit of her son’s estate, for whom she was appointed administratrix, on the alleged ground that he was killed through the negligent operation of its link-belt used to load saw logs, which were piled or stacked on the right-of-way, on to cars. The allegation of negligence was as follows:

“The operator of the link-belt carelessly and negligently, and without any regard for the safety of deceased, put into operation the link-belt and lifted the log from its position, causing the logs on the pile to roll down on him and fatally injure him.”

Appellees filed an answer, denying the allegation of negligence.

The cause was submitted on the 22d day of December, 1931, upon the pleadings and testimony adduced by the respective parties, at the conclusion of which appel-lees requested the court to instruct a verdict for them, which the court announced he would do unless appellant decided to take a nonsuit; whereupon appellant elected to take a nonsuit. The December, 1931, term of court was adjourned until February, 1932, at which time appellant filed a motion to vacate the judgment of nonsuit and continue the cause. The court vacated the judgment of nonsuit, reinstated the action, and dismissed same, to which dismissal appellant objected and excepted, and prayed and obtained an appeal to this court.

Appellant contends for a reversal of the judgment because the trial court, dismissed the cause instead of granting her a continuance. No ground for a continuance appears in the record. We cannot therefore say that the court abused its discretion in refusing to continue the cause.

After sustaining the motion to vacate the judgment of nonsuit and reinstate the cause, the court proceeded to, and did, enter the judgment he would have entered had appellant not taken the nonsuit. As no ground for continuance was shown, this was the only thing left for *590the court to do, if the undisputed testimony theretofore introduced tended to show no liability on the part of appellees.

Appellant relied upon the testimony of Delbert Turner to show that the operator of the link-belt applied power and raised the log in which appellant’s deceased son had fastened the hooks before he had time to move out of the way, thereby causing a log to roll down from the top of the pile and fatally injure him. Delbert Turner testified that he did not see the log in which the hooks had been fastened by deceased either moved or raised. The most he said when pressed on the point was that he saw the operator apply power. Under the allegation of negligence, it was necessary to show that the operator applied power and raised or moved the log so as to cause a log from the top of the pile to roll down and injure appellant’s deceased.

On account of the want of testimony tending to show liability, the trial court properly dismissed the cause of action.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Case No. 3:18cr92 

Plaintiff, 

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE 

vs. 

JEREMY WELLS 

Defendant. 

ORDER DELA YING EXECUTION OF SENTENCE 

For good cause shown and at the specific request of the defendant, it is hereby ordered that 

the defendant's execution of sentence be delayed until on or after February 14, 2021. The United 

States Marshal is to seek a designation for on or after February 14, 2021. 

January 14, 2021 

Copies to: 

Counsel of record 

United States Marshal 

WALTER H. RICE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 3:18-cr-00092-WHR Doc #: 61 Filed: 01/15/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 270