alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of PowerSecure International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  May 8, 2009
    /s/ Sidney HintonSidney HintonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case: 2:18-cv-00557-ALM-CMV Doc #: 3 Filed: 06/06/18 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: 19

Case: 2:18-cv-00557-ALM-CMV Doc #: 3 Filed: 06/06/18 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: 20

Case: 2:18-cv-00557-ALM-CMV Doc #: 3 Filed: 06/06/18 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: 21

Case: 2:18-cv-00557-ALM-CMV Doc #: 3 Filed: 06/06/18 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: 22

Case: 2:18-cv-00557-ALM-CMV Doc #: 3 Filed: 06/06/18 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: 23

Case: 2:18-cv-00557-ALM-CMV Doc #: 3 Filed: 06/06/18 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: 24
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of HF Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, CurtisL. Hage, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Curtis L. Hage                  |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   | Curtis L. Hage, Chairman, President |
|   | and Chief Executive Officer         |
|   |                                |   |
|   | Date:                               | February 5, 2010 |

 

 

*                                       A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to HF Financial Corp.and will be retained by HF Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### Cox v. Lee.

EXEMPTION : *Supersedeas on claim of exemption: Creditor's remedy.*

When an execution creditor is aggrieved by the order of a justice of the peace, granting a *supersedeas*to prevent the sale of property claimed as exempt, his remedy is by appeal to the circuit,court. *(Mans/. Digsec.*3006.) The justice has *no*power to recall the *supersedeas.*

APPEAL from *Logan*circuit court.

John S. Little, Judge.

STATEMENT.

’ Cox sued Lee in a justice’s court and recovered judgment for a debt amounting to $120. On this judgment an execution issued and was levied on certain personal property, which was advertised to be sold. Pursuant to a notice served on Cox, Lee filed with the justice his schedule, claiming the property as exempt, and obtained a1 supersedeas of the execution. Two days later, and before the day of sale, upon Cox’s application the justice *457revoked bis order for tbe supersedeas and recalled it. Tbe officer having tbe execution tben proceeded to sell tbe property and Cox bought it. Lee recovered it from him in an action of replevin brought before another justice. Cox appealed to tbe circuit court, and from a judgment rendered there against him has appealed to this court.

*Davis & Bulloch*and *Hall & Lewers,*for appellants.

The schedule filed by appellee was not a proper one, 40 *Ark.,*352, and the supersedeas improperly issued. It was the duty of the j ustice to recall it; and one justice of the peace has no jurisdiction to set aside, reinstate, ignore, supervise, or amend, the proceedings of another.

Part of the judgment was for purchase money of property scheduled, and this property could not be scheduled. *Mans/. Dig., sec.*4398. The schedule was not supported -by the affidavit required by law. *Act March*9, 1877; 41 *Ark,*249; 47 *Id.,*400; 40 *Id.,*352.

The supersedeas being improperly issued, was properly recalled by the j ustice.

*Olendenning*& *Bead,*for appellee.

The supersedeas having once issued, the justice lost •all control over it, and could not recall it. An appeal was the only remedy. The justice certainly could not recall it without notice to Lee. *Mansf. Dig., sec.*5201.

It does not appear in the record that any part of the •demand sued on, was for purchase money of part of the property scheduled. But if it was, it was appellants’ duty to have asserted their right when the schedule was ■filed. 46 *Ark.,*493.

*458OPINION.

CockriIíL, C. J.

When a plaintifí' in execution feels-aggrieved at the action of a justice of the peace in ordering the issuance of a supersedeas to prevent the sale of his judgment debtor’s property, as exempt from sale-under execution, his remedy is by appeal to the circuit court. *Mansf. Dig., sec.*3006; *Winter v. Simpson,*42 *Ark.,*411; *Cason v. Bone,*43 *Id.,*17; *Garrett v. Wade,*46 *Id.,*493.

The justice has no power to revoke the order and recall the supersedeas. *Dunnagan v. Shaffer,*48 *Ark.,*476. If he undertakes to do so, and the officer sells the-property under the execution to the plaintiff, the defendant may recover it in replevin.

Affirm.
Order filed October 20, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00882-CR

____________

DAMON DESHON MILES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1192156

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Wilford Anderson. Appellant’s 

brief was originally due December 13, 2010. No brief was filed. On December 20, 2010, 

notice was sent the brief was past due. On December 30, 2010, counsel filed a motion to 

extend time to file appellant’s brief. The motion was granted until January 31, 2010. 

On January 31, 2011, time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief and no 

motion for extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Counsel and the 

trial court were notified on February 11, 2011, that no brief had been received. No 

response was received.

On March 3, 2011, we abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct a 

hearing on the reason for the failure to file a brief. On March 22, 2011, a record of a 
2

hearing conducted March 18, 2011, was filed in this court. The record reflects Wilford 

Anderson informed the trial court that appellant’s brief would be filed in 30 days. The 

appeal was reinstated and appellant’s brief set due on April 18, 2011. No brief was filed. 

On April 28, 2011, notice was sent the brief was past due. No response was 

received. We again abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing on 

the reason for the failure to file a brief. On June 10, 2011, a record of a hearing conducted 

June 10, 2011, was filed in this court. The record reflects Wilford Anderson did not 

appear. Appellant stated his desire to pursue his appeal and reaffirmed his indigency. 

The trial court stated, on the record, “Well, I’ll talk to him about that when he comes in. 

He’s not in town right now. As soon as he comes back, I will talk to him about it.” 

No supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings was filed and no 

brief was filed. On August 11, 2011, we again ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing 

on the reason for the failure to file a brief. On September 22, 2011, a hearing record was 

filed and on September 26, 2011, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed. The records 

reflect Wilford Anderson again promised the trial court to file a brief in this appeal, by 

October 1, 2011. Once again, no brief has been filed. As of this date, appellant’s brief is

ten (10) months past due and Wilford Anderson has submitted no brief. 

Accordingly, we order Wilford Anderson to file a brief with the clerk of this Court 

on or before November 9, 2011. If Wilford Anderson does not timely file the brief as 

ordered, the Court will issue a show cause order directing him to appear before this Court 

on a date certain to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the 

brief as ordered.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally. 

Do Not Publish.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 29, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerJuly 31, 2007
Exhibit 10.2



December 2, 2009



Steve Filton

Senior
Vice President & CFO

UHS of Delaware, Inc.

367 South Gulph Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406



Dear Steve;



The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT), at their December 1, 2009
meeting, authorized the renewal of the current Advisory Agreement between UHT and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (Agreement) upon substantially the same terms and conditions contained in that Agreement, however, at an annual advisory fee equal to
..65 percent of the Average Invested Real Estate Assets of the Trust, as defined in the Agreement.



This letter constitutes UHTs offer to renew the Agreement, through December 31, 2010, upon such terms and conditions. Please
acknowledge UHS of Delawares acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to me. Thank you.



Sincerely,



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cheryl K. Ramagano                                    
|Cheryl K. Ramagano Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary



Agreed and Accepted:UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.By:

/s/ Steve FiltonSteve Filton Senior Vice
President and CFO
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|               |  |  |  |    |  |                                                                |  |                               
|-------------- |  |  |  | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|               |  |  |  |    |  | Bank of America, N.A., Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|               |  |  | 
|April 28, 2009 |  |  |  | By |  | /S/ NANCY G. WILLIS                                           
|               |  |  |  |    |  |                                                                |  | Nancy G. Willis Vice
President
|               |  |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, AND
THE NOTES THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         137,172
<SECURITIES>                                   157,910
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,481
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               363,290
<PP&E>                                          92,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 926,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,237
<BONDS>                                        287,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                     467,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   926,242
<SALES>                                        128,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,309
<CGS>                                           26,076
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  140,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,898
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,898
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3843-3844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01468]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 27, 2022.

PLACE: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the 
public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's

[[Page 3844]]

homepage (www.ncua.gov) and access the provided webcast link.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Board Briefing, Statutory Inflation Adjustment of Civil Monetary 
Penalties.
    2. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Succession Planning.
    3. Board Briefing, 2022 Supervisory Priorities.
    4. Board Briefing, Central Liquidity Facility, Expiration of CARES 
and Consolidated Appropriations Acts Impact.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, 
Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-01468 Filed 1-21-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
Exhibit
32.1
 ****
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
  We, Larry
W. Singleton, Chief Executive Officer of Raytech Corporation (the “Company”),
and John B. Devlin, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby
certify as follows:
 
 1.
    The
      annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended January 2,
      2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
    The
      information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in accordance
      with United States generally accepted accounting principles, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, we have executed this Certification this 18th day of April,
2005.
  ****By:
    /s/ LARRY W.
    SINGLETONLarry W. SingletonPresident
      and
      Chief
      Executive Officer
  ****By:
    /s/ JOHN B. DEVLINJohn B. DevlinVice
      President, Treasurer
      and
      Chief Executive Officer
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Sean Zeigler,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:18cv580

Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution,

Respondent.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed 

by the Magistrate Judge on July 12, 2023 (Doc. 33). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file 

objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th 

Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 33) have been filed

and the time to do so has expired.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 33) of the Magistrate Judge is 

hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge,

Petitioner’s Motion for Relief of Judgment (Doc. 32) is DENIED. Moreover, Petitioner is 

denied a certificate of appealability, because reasonable jurists would not disagree with 

the Court's conclusion, and Petitioner shall not be granted leave to appeal in forma

Case: 1:18-cv-00580-MRB-MRM Doc #: 34 Filed: 08/01/23 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1955
2

pauperis, as the Court certifies that any appeal would be objectively frivolous.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge

United States District Court

Case: 1:18-cv-00580-MRB-MRM Doc #: 34 Filed: 08/01/23 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1956
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

Notice of Open Meeting of the Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM).

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, February 24, 2022, from 2:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

The meeting will be held virtually.

      ( print page 4238)    

# STATUS:

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting will be open to public participation and time will be allotted for questions or comments submitted online. Members of the public may also file written statements before or after the meeting to                         *external@exim.gov.*                         Interested parties may register for the meeting at                         *https://teams.microsoft.com/​registration/​PAFTuZHHMk2Zb1GDkIVFJw,5M1LfonJMEi2VFUgYRv6oQ,i145n2l9vkmDj5btNlkuGw,x0C4PsIxqEe3e1J4MkfX9A,PdrWkxBplEaPp-Y8sXyvBg,4YXl84_​USEajrqMjPef8Gw?​mode=​read&​tenantId=​b953013c-c791-4d32-996f-518390854527.*

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Discussion of EXIM policies and programs designed to support the expansion of financing support for U.S. manufactured goods and services in Sub-Saharan Africa.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information, contact India Walker, External Engagement Specialist at 202-480-0062.

Joyce B. Stone,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-01812 Filed 1-25-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, A. Bradley Gabbard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



                                        /s/  A. Bradley Gabbard
                                        ------------------------------------


                                        A. Bradley Gabbard
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        May 14, 2003

       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.