alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             13,889
<SECURITIES>                                      290,625
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        30,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  334,746
<PP&E>                                             42,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                     31,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    347,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,225,216
<BONDS>                                           474,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        2,331,458
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,208,685)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      347,989
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  194,275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 31,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (123,519)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (123,519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (123,519)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.01)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, David R. Odenath, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: November 14, 2005 |                                                                            |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                            |
|                     | /s/ David R. Odenath, Jr.          |
|                     | Name: David R. Odenath, Jr.                                                     |
|                     | Title: Chief Executive Officer and    President                                 |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
Exhibit 10.2


                    AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

           This AMENDMENT NO. 2 made as of the 6th day of December, 2002, to
the Employment Agreement made as of the 20th day of November, 1998 (as
amended, the "Agreement"), between UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC., a Delaware
corporation, with principal offices at 365 West Passaic Street, Rochelle Park,
New Jersey 07662-6563 and GEORGE R. REMETA, residing at 25 Lee Way, Oakland,
New Jersey 07436.

           WHEREAS, capitalized terms used herein and defined in the Agreement
shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement;

           WHEREAS, the Executive has been employed by the Company as its Vice
Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer;

           WHEREAS, the Company desires to continue the services of the
Executive, and the Executive desires to continue to provide such services to
the Company, on the terms set forth in the Agreement; and

           WHEREAS, the provisions of this Amendment were recommended by the
Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors on December 5, 2002
and approved by the Company's Board of Directors on December 6, 2002 with the
Executive abstaining.

           NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
obligations hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto, intending to be legally
bound, hereby agree as follows:

1.  Section 1(u) of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                     "(u) Term of Employment shall mean the period of time
                     commencing on November 20, 1998 and ending on July 30,
                     2007 or such later date as may be mutually agreed upon by
                     the Company and the Executive. (For the avoidance of
                     doubt, Term of Employment as used herein may extend
                     beyond the termination of the Executive's employment.)"


2.  All the other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in force unchanged.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this
Agreement in Rochelle Park, New Jersey, in duplicate originals on December 6,
2002.

                                                 UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.

                                                 By:/s/ RAPHAEL BENAROYA
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                 Name:    Raphael Benaroya
                                                 Title:   Chairman of the Board

                                                 /s/ GEORGE R. REMETA
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 George R. Remeta

GRR Amend 2 to Employment Agr.
KPC:jmt
EXHIBIT 23.1

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have issued our reports dated March 14, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-163512) and on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-145778 and 333-80505).








/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP





Tulsa, Oklahoma


March 14, 2011
### TO: FROM: RE: 

# NORWOODMEMORIALAIRPORT MEMO
Memo to File Russ Maguire 1-8-2013 Phone Conversation with Mary Walsh, Director, FAAAirports Division TODAY' SDATE: January 8, 2013 According to FAA's Mary Walsh, the purpose ofher phone call was to warn me and the Norwood Airport Commission about the actions and "bizarre behavior" of Boston Executive Helicopter's (BEH) President, Chris Donovan. Apparently, Mr. Donovan had recently been in communications with FAA regarding an FAA e-mail, dated January 2, 2013, and authored by Barry Hammer, which set down FAA's recommendations (and caution)regarding aproposed sub-leaseterm to BEH. In all ofher years at FAA, Ms. Walsh said that she had "never seen anything like this." She characterized Mr. Donovanin the following manner:

• "bizzarebehavior" • "notnormal behavior" • "veryparanoid" "bordered on intimidation" Apparently, Mr. Donovan-along with his accountant, Patrick O'Malley--were berating Ms. Walsh and Mr. Hammer with a string ofphone calls and e-mails (25 e-mails, over the course ofan estimated 12-hourperiod), charging FAAwith incompetence. Ms. Walsh said that she felt compelledto contact FAA's Security Divisionregardingthis. According to 

### Ms. Walsh, Mr. Donovan also stated to her that both I and the Norwood Airport Commission "had it out for him (Donovan)." As a result, 

### Ms. Walsh said: "I would have concerns about you and the Airport Commission given what he (Donovan) said." In an effort to move the process in a productive direction, Ms. Walsh did say that FAA wouldbe opento a meeting with boththe Airport Commission and BEH.
<PAGE>
 
The CIT Group/
Business Credit, Inc.
3rd Floor
300 south Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA  90071
Tel:  213-613-2575
Fax:  213-613-2588



                                August 1, 1997


Buttrey Food and Drug Company
601 6th Street S.W.
Great Falls, MT  59404

Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the Financing Agreement between you and the Lenders party
thereto dated September 7, 1995, as amended from time to time (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein and defined in the Agreement shall have the same
meanings as set forth therein unless otherwise specifically defined herein.

Effective immediately, pursuant to mutual understanding, the Agreement shall be,
and hereby is, amended as follows:

 .  Section 1 of the Agreement shall be, and hereby is, amended by deleting the
   definition of "INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO" in its entirety and replacing it with
                  -----------------------                                       
   the following definition of "INTEREST CHARGE COVERAGE RATIO":
                                ------------------------------  
 
 .  "INTEREST CHARGE COVERAGE RATIO" shall mean a ratio determined as of the
    ------------------------------                                         
   relevant calculation date by dividing EBITDA by Interest Expense for the
   applicable period, except for the calculation dates subsequent to July 31,
   1997, where any interest expense and associated penalties relating to the
   Internal Revenue Service's and/or state's adjustment of income taxes due for
   the fiscal years ended February 2, 1991, February 1, 1992, January 30, 1993,
   and January 29, 1994 shall be excluded from the determination of such ratio.
   The amount of interest expense and associated penalties excluded under this
   provision shall not exceed $2,000,000.
 
Except as otherwise hereinabove provided, no other change, amendment, or
modification of any of the terms or provisions of the Agreement is hereby
intended or implied.  If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding,
please sign and return to us the enclosed copy of this letter to so indicate.
<PAGE>
 
                                       THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.



                                       By /s/ William P. Shiao
                                         --------------------------------  
                                       Title:  Assistant Vice President


                                       THE CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC.


                                       By /s/ Cecile A. Segovia
                                         -------------------------------
                                       Title:  Vice President


Read and Agreed to:
BUTTREY FOOD AND DRUG COMPANY



By /s/ Wayne S. Peterson
  --------------------------------
  Title: Senior Vice President and
         Chief Financial Officer
Case: 2:18-cv-00745-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 4 Filed: 08/01/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 21
Case: 2:18-cv-00745-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 4 Filed: 08/01/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 22
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, A. Bradley Gabbard, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metretek Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) *[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 11, 2006 /s/ A. Bradley Gabbard A. Bradley Gabbard
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 98 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 98

Establishing the Congressional Gold Star Family Fellowship Program for 
the placement in offices of Senators of children, spouses, and siblings 
 of members of the Armed Forces who are hostile casualties or who have 
                  died from a training-related injury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2019

 Mrs. Blackburn submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
              to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Establishing the Congressional Gold Star Family Fellowship Program for 
the placement in offices of Senators of children, spouses, and siblings 
 of members of the Armed Forces who are hostile casualties or who have 
                  died from a training-related injury.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``SFC Sean Cooley and SPC 
Christopher Horton Congressional Gold Star Family Fellowship Program 
Resolution''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL GOLD STAR FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``eligible individual'' means an individual 
        who is the child (including a stepchild), spouse, or sibling of 
        a member of the Armed Forces who is a hostile casualty or died 
        from a training-related injury;
            (2) the terms ``hostile casualty'' and ``training-related 
        injury'' have the meanings given those terms in section 2402(b) 
        of title 38, United States Code; and
            (3) the term ``Program'' means the Congressional Gold Star 
        Family Fellowship Program established under subsection (b).
    (b) Establishment.--There is established in the Senate the 
Congressional Gold Star Family Fellowship Program, under which an 
eligible individual may serve a 12-month fellowship in the office of a 
Senator.
    (c) Direction of Program.--The Program shall be carried out under 
the direction of the Secretary of the Senate.
    (d) Placement in District of Columbia Office or a State Office.--An 
individual may serve a fellowship under the Program at the office of a 
Senator in the District of Columbia or an office of the Senator in the 
State the Senator represents.
    (e) Regulations.--The Program shall be carried out in accordance 
with regulations promulgated by the Committee on Rules and 
Administration of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 7 

To make effective appointment of Senate Legal Counsel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To make effective appointment of Senate Legal Counsel. 

1 Resolved, That the appointment of Patricia Mack 

2 Bryan of Virginia to be Senate Legal Counsel, made by 

3 the President pro tempore this day, is effective as of Janu4 ary 3, 2019, and the term of service of the appointee shall 

5 expire at the end of the One Hundred Seventeenth Con6 gress. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
FILED AO 442 (Rev. 11/11) Arrest Wamml RICHARD WNADFI

CLCRi;

United States District Court2oi8 jul 25 ph 3: zk

''J.S.OiSTRICT COURT

^"'^^•'-ROiSTOHio

CINC'RW.aTi

Southern District ofOhio u/rU'mw'tPl^ WES I DIV CINC'RWaTi

United States of America

V.

ANDREY SHUKLIN

Case No. 1:18-cr-00109(1)

Defendant

ARREST WARRANT 5

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

YOU ARE COMMANDED to arrest and bring before a United States magistrate judge without unnecessary delay

(name ofperson w be arrested) ANDREY SHUKLIN

ro

cz>

cr>

<r>

C"J

I

s~

IH

CO

who is accused of an offense or violation based on the following document filed with the court:

^ Indictment • Superseding Indictment •Information • Superseding Information •Complaint

• Probation Violation Petition • Supervised Release Violation Petition •Violation Notice • Order of the Court

This offense is briefly described as follows:

18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) - Conspiracy to Participate in Racketeering Activity

(SEE ATTACHED INDICTMENT)

7/25/2018

bsuPtg officer's signal

City and state: CINCINNATI, OHIO Richard W. Nagel, Clerk, U.S.

Printed name and title

Return -j/i I

This warrant was received on (date) 07,and the person was arrested on (date) IS-Q i1?

at (city and Slate) f

Date: /.iPorS tANlC

Arresting officer's signature

UfJK

Printed name and title

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 63 Filed: 10/04/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 456
EXHIBIT 23

                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated May 3,2004,
appearing in the Annual Report on page F-2 of Form 10-KSB of Odyssey Marine
Exploration, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended February 29, 2004, in
the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-50325
and 333-76038 regarding the 1997 Stock Option Plan and SEC File No.
333-50343 regarding the Consulting Agreement; and in the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-42824.



/s/ Ferlita, Walsh & Gonzalez, P.A.
Ferlita, Walsh & Gonzalez, P.A.
3302 Azeele Street
Tampa, Florida  33609

May 28, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Applied Innovation Inc.:

Under date of February 2, 2001, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets
of Applied Innovation Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2000, which are included in the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders. In
connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial
statements, we also audited the related financial statement schedule of
valuation and qualifying accounts. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.



/s/KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 2, 2001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

RICARDO VERNAIR DODSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GARY C. MOHR, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:18-cv-00908

District Judge Sarah D. Morrison

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

DECISION AND ENTRY

Plaintiff Ricardo Vernair Dodson has submitted three Motions to Compel (Doc. #s 54, 

58, 59), and a Motion for Leave to File his Sworn Declaration Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

37(a)(1). Permitting Plaintiff to file his Sworn Declaration works no prejudice upon Defendants. 

His Motion for Leave to File is therefore granted.

Defendants initially opposed Plaintiff’s first Motion to Compel. (Doc. #56). Since then, 

however, Defendants have sent Plaintiff their responses to his Interrogatories and Requests for 

Production of Documents. See Doc. #64. As a result, Defendants correctly assert that Plaintiff’s 

most recent (third) Motion to Compel is moot. In addition, because Plaintiff’s first and second 

Motions to Compel seek the same relief as his third Motion to Compel (i.e., an Order requiring 

Defendants to respond to his Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents), 

Defendants’ recent discovery responses moot each Motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File his Sworn Declaration Pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) (Doc. #61) is GRANTED, and his Declaration should 

remain in the record; and

Case: 2:18-cv-00908-SDM-SLO Doc #: 66 Filed: 07/06/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 692
2

2. Plaintiffs’ Motions to Compel (Doc. #s 54, 58, 59) are DENIED as moot.

July 6, 2020 s/Sharon L. Ovington

Sharon L. Ovington

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:18-cv-00908-SDM-SLO Doc #: 66 Filed: 07/06/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 693
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09420**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 09420\09420_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09420\09420_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09420\09420_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09420\09420_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09420\09420_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09420\09420_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09420\09420_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09420\09420_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09420\Certification Statement Plant ID 09420.pdf Plant certification statement 09420\Supplemental Documents\09420_A5-2.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09420\Supplemental Documents\09420_A5-3 and D3-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09420\Supplemental Documents\09420_C3-23.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09420\Supplemental Documents\09420_C3-31 F.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 09420\Supplemental Documents\09420_C3-36.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.