### J"- ,


# OAR Box 

# 1384 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



# Document

Number: 

# JM^SS J ll-F- 4 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:12 AM

Sheet 255of 264P.2 PAPERWOR KREDUCTIO NAC T SUBMISSIO N Pleas erea dth einstruction s beforecompletin g thi s form
. Fo r additional form s or

assist !
. . (~\\J

/~r\ Clearanc eOfficer
. Sen dtw o copie s o f thi s form , th ecollectio ninstrumen t t o b erevie w / A- ' j ] ~ " j CN
. Offic eo f Informatio nan dRegulatory Affairs , Offic eo f Managemen t

an dBudget , Dock 20503
. '^^^^^^^^ M 

# JT-F- 

# H

1
. Agency/Subagenc y originatin g reques t EPA/Offic eo f

Air Quality Plannin g an dStandard s 2
. OM B contro l number b
. B Non e 206 0 3
. Typ eo f

informatio ncollectio n(check one) a . B New collectio n b
. • Revisio no f

acurrentl y approve dcollectio n c . • Extensio no f

acurrentl y approve dcollectio n d
. D Reinstatement , withou t change , o f

apreviousl y approve d collectio nfor

whic happroval ha s expire d e . • Reinstatement , wit

hchange , o f

apreviousl y approve d collectio nfo

r whic happroval ha s expire d f
. D Existin g collectio ninus ewithou t a nOM B contro l numbe r For b-f note itemA2 of

Supporting Statement

Instructions 4
. Typ eo f revie w requeste d(check

one) a . B Regula

r b
. • Emergenc y - Approval requeste dby : c . D Delegate d / /
5
. Smal l entitie s Wil l thi s informatio ncollectio nhav easignificant economi c impac t o nasubstantial number

o f smal l entities ? B Ye s • N o 6
. Requeste dexpiratio ndat e a . E 3 Thre eyear s fromapproval dat eb
. • Othe r Specify : /

/ 7
. Titl e National Emissio nStandard s for Hazardou s Air

Pollutant s (NESHAP ) for Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio n 8
. Agenc y for

mnumber(s ) 1976.0 1 9
. Keyword s Administrativ ePractic ean dProcedure , Air Pollutio nControl,Reinforce dPlasti c Composites , Composite s Fabrication , CleanAir Act , Environmenta l Protection , Hazardou s Substances , Intergovernmental Relations , Reportin g an dRecordkeepin g Requirement s 10
. Abstrac t Respondent s areowner s an doperator s o f reinforce dplasti c composite s productio noperations
. Respondent s mus t submi t notification s an d report s an dmaintai nrecord s require db y th eGeneral Provision s (4 0 CFRpart 63 , subpart

A)
. Recordkeepin g o f

parameter s relate dt o ai r pollutio n contro l technologie s i s required
. Th ereport s an drecord s wil l b euse dt o demonstrat ecomplianc ewit hth eemissio nlimitation s an dwor k practic e standards
. 11
. Affecte dpubli c (Mark primarywith "P"

and all others that

apply with "X") a . _Individual s o r

household s d
. Farm s b
. _ PBusines s o r

othe r for-profi t e . X

_Federal Governmen t c . _Not-for-profi t

institution s f

. X

_State , Localo r

Tribal Governmen t 12
. Obligatio nto respon d(Mark primarywith "P"

and all others that

apply with "X") a . _Voluntary b
. _Require dto obtai nor retai nbenefit s c . P

_Mandatory 13
. Annua l reportin g an drecordkeepin g hou r burde n a . Numbe r

o f respondent s b
. Total annual response s 1
. Percentag eo f

thes eresponse s collecte delectronicall y c . Total hour s requeste d d
. Curren t

OM B inventory e . Differenc e f
. Explanatio no f

differenc e 1
. ProgramChang e 2
. Adjustment 46 7 540 0 % 15,12 2 0 15,12 2 15,12 2 14
. Annual reportin g an drecordkeepin g cos t burde n(in thousands of dollars) a . Total annualize dcapital/startu p cost s $ 0 b
. Total annual cost s (O&M ) c . Total annualize dcos t

requeste d d
. Curren t OM B inventory e . Differenc e f
. Explanatio no f

differenc e 1
. Programchang e 2
. Adjustment $ 1 7 $ 1 7 $ 0 $ 1 7 $ 1 7

15
. Purpos eo f

informatio ncollectio n(MarkprimaryWith "P" and all others that

applywith "X") a . Applicatio nfo

r benefit s e . Programplannin g o r management b
. Progra mevaluatio nf
. Researc h c . Genera l purpos estatistic s g . PRegulatory o r complianc e d
. _Audi t 16. Frequenc y o f recordkeepin g o r

reportin g (check

all that apply) b
. D Thir dparty disclosur e a . B Recordkeepin g c . HReportin g 1
. D O noccasio n 4
. • Quarterl y 7
. • Biannuall y 2
. • Weekly 3
. aMonthl y

5
. HSemi-annuall y 6
. • Annuall y 8
. B Othe r

(describe ) Initial 17
. Statistica l method s Doe s thi s informatio ncollectio nemplo y statisticalmethods ?
• Yes B N o 18
. Agenc y contac t (person who can best

answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name : Keit

hBarnett Phone : (919)541-560 5 OM B 83- 1 10/9 5P. 3 

### .19 : ^Certificatio

nfo r Paperwor k Reductio nAc t Submission

s O nbehalf o f thi s Federa

l agency , Icertif

y tha t th ecollectiono

f informatio

nencompassedb

y thi s request

complie s wit

h 5 CF R1320.9
. NOTE : Th

etex t o f 5 CF R1320.9 , an

dtherelatedprovision s o

f 5 CF R1320.8(b)(3) , appea

r a t th een do f th einstructions
. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatoryprovisions as set forth in the instructions. Thefollowing i s asummar

y o f thetopics , regarding theproposedcollectiono f information , tha

t th ecertificationcovers : (a ) I t i s necessar

y fo r th eprope r performanceo

f agenc y functions ; (b ) I t avoid s unnecessar

y duplication ; (c ) I t reduce s burde

no nsmal l entities ; (d) I t use s plain , coherent, an

dunambiguou s terminology tha t i s understandablet

o respondents ; (e) Its implementationwil

l beconsisten

t an dcompatiblewit

hcurren t reporting an

drecordkeeping practices ; (f ) I t indicate s theretentionperiod s fo r recordkeeping requirements ; (g) I t informs respondents o

f th einformatio

ncalledfo r unde r 5 CF R1320.8(b)(3) : (i ) Wh y theinformatio

ni s being collected ; (ii ) Us eo f information ; (iii ) Burde

nestimate ; (iv) Natur eo f respons e(voluntary , requiredfo r abenefit, o

r mandatory) ; (v) Natur ean dexten t o f confidentiality ; an

d (vi) Nee dt o displa y currentl y validOM

B control number ; (h) I t was developedb

y a nofficetha

t has plannedan

dallocatedresource s fo

r theefficien

t an deffectivemanagemen

t an dus eo f th e informationt

o b ecollected(seenot

ei nIte m1 9 o f theinstructions) ; (i ) I t use s effectivean

defficien t statistica l surve y methodology ; an

d (j ) I t makes appropriat

eus eo f informatio ntechnology
. I f yo u ar eunablet o certif y compliancewit

han y o f thes eprovisions , identif

y theite mbelow an

dexplai nth ereasoni nIte m1 8 o f th e Supporting Statement
.

Signatur eo f Progra mOfficeOfficia

l Dat e Signatur eo f Senio r Officia l o r Designee

OM B 83- 1 Dat e Oscar Morales , Directo r Collectio nStrategie s Divisio n Offic eof Environmental Informatio n 

### 10/95P. 4



## Certificatio nRequiremen t fo r Paperwork

Reductio nAc t

Submission s 5 CF R1320. 9 read s "A s part of th eagenc y submissio nto OM B of apropose dcollectio no f information , th eagenc y (throug hth eheado f th eagency , th eSenio r

Official o r

thei r designee ) shal l certif

y (an dprovid earecordsupportin g suc hcertification ) tha t th epropose d collectio no f

informatio n- "(a ) i s necessary for

th eproper

performanc eo f

th efunction s o f

th eagency , includin g that th einformatio nto b ecollecte dwill hav e practica l utility ; "(b ) i s no t

unnecessaril y duplicativ eof informatio notherwis ereasonabl y accessibl eto th eagency ; "(c ) reduce s to th eexten t practicabl ean dappropriat eth eburde no nperson s wh o shal l provid einformatio nto o r for th eagency , includin g wit

hrespec t to smal l entities , a s define dinth eRegulatory Flexibility Ac t 5 U.S. C § 601(6)) , th eus eo f suc htechnique s as : "(1 ) establishin g differin g complianc eo r reportin g requirement s o r timetable s that

takeinto accoun t

th eresource s availabl et o thos ewh o ar eto respond ; "(2 ) th eclarification , consolidation , o r simplificatio no f

complianc ean dreportin g requirements ; o r collectio no f

informatio n, o r any part thereof; "(3 ) anexemptio nfromcoverag eo f th ecollectio no f

information , o r

any part thereof; "(d ) i s writte nusin g plain , coherent , an dunambiguou s terminolog y an di s understandabl et o thos ewh o areto respond ; "(e ) i s t o b eimplemente dinway s consisten t an dcompatible , to th emaximu mexten t practicable , wit

hth eexistin g reportin g an d recordkeepin g practice s o f thos ewh o areto respond ; "(f ) indicate s fo r

eac hrecordkeepin g requiremen t th elengtho f

timeperson s arerequire dt o maintai nth erecord s specified ; "(g ) inform s potential respondent s of th einformatio ncalle dfor under § 1320.8(b)(3) ; [se ebelow ] "(h ) ha s bee ndevelope db y a noffic ethat

ha s planne dan dallocate dresource s for th eefficient

an deffectiv emanagemen t an dus eo f

th e informatio nt o b ecollected , includin g th eprocessin g o f th einformatio ninamanner whic hshal l enhance , whereappropriate , th eutility o f th einformatio nt o agencies an dth epublic ; "(i ) use s effectiv ean defficient statistical surve y methodolog y appropriat et o th epurpos efor whic hth einformatio ni s t o b ecollected ; an d "(j ) t o th emaximu mexten t practicable , use s appropriat einformatio ntechnolog y t o reduc eburde nandimprov edat aquality , agenc y efficienc y an dresponsivenes s t o th epublic. " NOTE : 5 CF R1320.8(b)(3 ) require s that eac hcollectio no f

information : "(3 ) inform s an dprovide s reasonabl enotic eto th epotential person s t o who mth ecollectio no f informatio ni s addresse dof : "(i ) th ereason s th einformatio ni s planne dto b eand/o r ha s bee nuse dt o further

th eproper

performanc eo f

th efunction s o f th eagency ; "(ii ) th ewa

y suc hinformatio ni s planne dt o b eand/o r ha s bee nuse dto further

th eproper

performanc eo f

th efunction s o f

th e agency ; "(iii ) a nestimate , t o th eexten t

practicable , o f

th eaverag eburde no f

th ecollectio n(together

wit hareques t

that th epubli c direc t t o th eagenc y any comment s concernin g th eaccurac y of thi s burde nestimat eandany suggestions for reducin g thi s burden) ; "(iv ) whethe r

response s to th ecollectio no f informatio narevoluntary , require dto obtai no r retai nabenefi t

(citin g authority) , o r mandatory (citin g authority) ; "(v ) th enatur ean dexten t of confidentiality to b eprovided , if any (citin g authority) ; an d "(vi ) th efac t

that any agenc y ma

y no t conduc t o r sponsor , an daperso ni s no t require dto respon dto , acollectio no f informatio nunles s it

display s acurrentl y vali dOM B contro l number. " OM B 83- 1 (Instructions ) 10/9 5P. 5



## STANDAR D FOR M 8 3 SUPPORTIN G STATEMEN T IC R N0.1976-

- NATIONA L EMISSIO NSTANDARD S FO R HAZARDOU S AI R POLLUTANT S FO R REINFORCE D PLASTI C COMPOSITE S PRODUCTIO N

(4 0 CF R PAR T 63 , SUBPAR T WWWW )

U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a 2771 1

Augus t 200 0P. 6



## PAR T A O F TH E SUPPORTINGSTATEMENT : JUSTIFICATION S 1 . Identificatio n o f th e Informatio n Collectio n 

# (a) Title and

Number of the Information Collected Th e titl e o f thi s informatio n collectio n reques t (ICR ) i s "Recordkeepin g an d Reportin g Requirement s fo r th e Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s (NESHAP ) fo r Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s Production." Thi s i s a ne wIC R tha t ha s bee n assigne d Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) IC R numbe r 1976.01 . 

# (b) Short

characterization/abstract Th e propose d standard s regulat e reinforce d plasti c composite s (RPC ) productio n operation s an d processes . Th e emission s fro m

thes e operation s an d processe s ar e fugitiv e emissions . Fugitiv e emission s ar e th e resul t o f hazardou s ai r pollutant s (HAP ) evaporatin g fro mth e resins , ge l coats , an d cleanin g solvent s use d i n th e reinforce d plasti c composit e productio n operation s an d processes . Eac howne r o r operato r o f a sourc e affecte d b yth e propose d standard s woul d b e require d t o submi t a n initia l notificatio n tha t th e sourc e i s subjec t t o th e standard . Eac hresponden t woul d submi t semiannua l complianc e reports . Additiona l record s an d report s woul d depen d o n ho wth e owne r o r operato r mus t compl y wit hth e standards . Th e owne r o r operato r o f a RP C manufacturin g facilit ytha t i s subjec t t o thes e propose d standard s mus t contro l HA P b yeithe r limitin g th e HA P conten t o f material s use d an d usin g non-atomize d spra yapplicatio n i n th e manufacturin g processe s o r b yusin g a n enclosur e an d add-o n contro l device . Respondent s tha t ca n compl yb ylimitin g th e HA P conten t o f thei r ra wmaterial s woul d monito r an d recor d (i n a spreadsheet )P. 7



## th e monthl yconsumptio n o f materia l an d sho wth e weighted-averag e HA P conten t ove r th e pas t 1 2 months . However , i f al l th e material s i n a n operatio n mee t th e HA P conten t limit , the n eac h responden t woul d nee d onl yt o recor d HA P conten t an d woul d no t nee d t o trac k monthl yconsumptio n o r recor d th e computations . Fo r ope n moldin g an d centrifuga l castin g operation s a t RP C productio n facilities , respondent s woul d als o hav e th e optio n o f averagin g amon g thirtee n differen t processe s (ope n molding ) an d tw o differen t processe s (centrifuga l casting) . Respondent s woul d us e option s i n th e regulatio n t o calculat e actua l an d allowabl e emission s fo r th e combine d ope n moldin g an d centrifuga l castin g operations . Complianc e woul d b e base d o n a 12-mont hrollin g average . Respondent s wh o mus t us e a n enclosur e an d a n add-o n contro l devic e woul d submi t a contro l devic e performanc e tes t report , includin g operatin g range s fo r monitore d parameters ; an d annua l start-up , shutdown , an d malfunctio n reports . Respondent s woul d b e require d t o monito r an d kee p record s o f specifi c operatin g parameter s fo r eac hcontro l device . 2 . Nee d fo r an d Us e o f th e Collectio n 

# (a) Need/Authorityfor the Collection Th e EP Aneed s thi s informatio n t o ensur e tha t HA P emission s ar e reduce d i n th e processe s an d operation s tha t constitut e Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s Manufacturing . Th e EP Ai s require d unde r sectio n 112(d ) o f th e Clea n Ai r Ac t (CAA ) t o regulat e emission s o f th e HA P liste d i n sectio n 112(b ) o f th e CAA . Th e majo r HA P identifie d b yEP Aa s bein g emitte d fro mth e Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s Manufacturin g Sourc e Categor yinclud e styrene , methy l methacrylat e (MMA) , an d methylen e chlorid e (dichloromethane) .P. 8



## I n th e Administrator' s judgment , HA P emission s fro mRP C manufacturin g processe s an d operation s caus e o r contribut e significantl yt o ai r pollutio n tha t ma yreasonabl yb e anticipate d t o endange r publi c health . Consequently , NESHA P fo r thi s sourc e categor yha s bee n develope d an d ar e bein g proposed . Sectio n 11 4 o f th e CAAallow s th e Administrato r t o requir e inspections , monitoring , an d entr yint o facilitie s t o ensur e complianc e wit ha sectio n 11 2 emissio n standard . Sectio n 114(a)(1 ) specificall ystates : "Th e Administrato r ma yrequir e an yperso n wh o own s o r operate s an yemissio n source...wh o i s subjec t t o th e provision s o f th e CAAo n a one-time , periodic , o r continuou s basi s to ; (A ) establis han d maintai n suc hrecords ; (B ) mak e suc hreports ; (C ) instal l use , an d maintai n suc hmonitorin g equipment , an d us e suc haudi t procedures , o r methods ; (D ) sampl e suc hemissions ; (E ) kee p record s o n contro l equipmen t parameters , productio n variable s o r othe r indirec t dat a whe n direc t monitorin g o f emission s i s impractical ; (F ) submi t complianc e certification s i n accordanc e wit h sectio n 114(a)(3) ; an d (G ) provid e suc hothe r informatio n a s th e Administrato r ma y reasonabl yrequire. " Certai n record s an d report s ar e necessar yt o enabl e th e Administrato r t o identif ysource s subjec t t o th e standar d an d t o ensur e tha t th e standard , whic hi s base d o n a maximu machievabl e contro l technolog y(MACT) , i s bein g achieved . 

# (b) Practical

Utility/Users of

Collected

InformationP. 9



## Th e informatio n wil l b e use d b yEP Ato : (1 ) identif ynew , modified , reconstructed , an d existin g source s subjec t t o th e standards ; (2 ) identif yth e contro l methodologie s bein g applied ; an d (3 ) ensur e tha t emissio n contro l device s ar e bein g properl y operate d an d maintained . I n addition , record s an d report s ar e necessar yt o enabl e EP A t o identif yfacilitie s tha t ma yno t b e i n complianc e wit hth e standards . Base d o n reporte d information , EP Aca n decid e whic h facilitie s shoul d b e inspecte d an d wha t record s o r specifi c emissio n source s shoul d b e inspecte d a t eac hfacility . Also , th e record s tha t facilitie s maintai n provid e a n indicatio n t o EP A whethe r facilit ypersonne l ar e calculatin g emission s properly . T o minimiz e burdens , muc ho f th e informatio n EP Awoul d nee d t o determin e complianc e woul d b e recorde d an d retaine d on-sit e a t th e facility . Suc hinformatio n woul d b e reviewe d b yenforcemen t personne l durin g a n inspectio n an d woul d no t nee d t o b e routinel y reporte d t o EPA . I n addition , i n man ycase s EP Aha s selecte d parameter s fo r monitorin g tha t ar e readil yavailabl e o r ar e alread ymonitore d b yth e industr yfo r othe r purposes . 3 . Nonduplication , Consultations , an d Othe r Collectio n Criteri a 

# (a) Nonduplication Som e facilitie s subjec t t o thi s NESHA P wil l als o b e subjec t t o requirement s unde r th e Plasti c Part s an d Product s NESHA P currentl yunde r development . Th e burde n requeste d fo r thi s NESHA P doe s no t duplicat e an yo f th e burde n accounte d fo r unde r subpar t II . Non e o f th e informatio n requeste d i n thi s IC R i s availabl e fro mothe r resources , suc ha s th e Toxi c Releas e Inventory . Certai n report s require d b yStat e o r loca l agencie s ma y duplicat e informatio n require d b yth e standards . I n suc hcases ,P.1 0



## a cop yo f th e repor t submitte d t o th e Stat e o r loca l agenc yma y b e sen t t o th e Administrato r i n lie u o f th e repor t require d b y th e standards . 

# (b) PublicNotice Required Prior to ICR Submission to the Office of Management

and Budget Th e EP Asolicite d publi c comment s o n th e nee d fo r thi s information , th e accurac yo f th e burde n estimates , an d an y suggeste d method s fo r minimizin g responden t burde n i n th e propose d rul e announce d i n th e Federa l Register . Th e fina l rul e wil l respon d t o an ycomment s fro mth e publi c o n thes e informatio n collectio n requirements . 

# (c) Consultations Th e EP Ainvolve d RP C manufacturers , includin g 1 7 smal l firms , an d thei r trad e associatio n i n th e developmen t o f thi s NESHA P an d th e associate d recordkeepin g an d reportin g requirements . Thes e group s hav e bee n full yinvolve d i n thi s rulemakin g effort . Th e EP Aha s considere d thei r comment s an d concern s i n developin g th e propose d regulation . 

# (d) Effects of

Less Frequent

Collection Failur e t o requir e periodi c reportin g o f HA P emission s woul d resul t i n th e inabilit yo f th e Administrato r t o determin e i f a sourc e i s i n complianc e wit hth e NESHAP . I f th e report s an d dat a parameter s wer e collecte d les s frequently , EP Awoul d no t b e abl e t o identif ypotentia l complianc e problem s i n a timel yfashion . Atypica l NESHA P require s quarterl yreporting ; however , becaus e thi s NESHA P i s base d o n pollutio n prevention , semiannua l report s ar e required . Semiannua l report s ar e require d s o tha t EP Aca n ensur e tha t timel ycorrectiv e actio n i s bein g taken .P.1 1



## Respondent s wh o mus t us e a n enclosur e an d a n add-o n contro l devic e woul d submi t a contro l devic e performanc e tes t report , including operating range s fo r monitore d parameters ; an d annua l start-up , shutdown , an d malfunctio n reports . Respondent s woul d b e require d t o monito r an d kee p record s o f specifi c operating parameter s fo r eac hcontro l device . Aquarterl yrepor t i s require d i f a facilit yusin g a n add-o n contro l devic e exceed s th e emissio n limits . I f thi s informatio n wer e collecte d les s frequently , th e mai n consequenc e coul d b e decrease d performanc e o f emissio n contro l measure s du e t o lac k o f regula r inspection , whic hcoul d resul t i n increase d HA P emissions . 

# (e) General

Guidelines Thi s informatio n collectio n meet s th e Offic e o f Managemen t and Budget' s (OMB ) genera l guideline s fo r informatio n collection s and therefor e doe s no t requir e justificatio n fo r an ydeviatio n fromOMB' s genera l guidelines . 

# (f) Confidentiality Al l informatio n submitte d t o EPAfo r whic ha clai mo f confidentialit yi s mad e wil l b e safeguarde d according t o EPA policie s i n 4 0 CF R par t 2 , subpar t B , Confidentialit yo f Busines s Information . 

# (g) Sensitive questions Thi s informatio n collectio n doe s no t reques t an yinformatio n concernin g sexua l behavio r o r attitudes , religiou s beliefs , o r othe r matter s usuall yconsidere d private . 4 . Th e Respondent s an d th e Informatio n Requeste dP.1 2



# (a) Respondents/North American Industrial Classification System and Standard

Industrial

Classification Codes Respondent s ar e owner s o r operator s o f RP C manufacturin g facilities . Th e followin g processe s an d operation s constitut e RP C manufacturing : close d mol d an d ope n mol d fiberglas s manufacturing ; resi n an d ge l coa t mixing ; resi n an d ge l coa t applicatio n equipmen t cleaning ; an d resi n an d ge l coa t storage . Entitie s potentiall yregulate d b ythi s actio n ar e thos e majo r source s o f HA P tha t manufactur e reinforce d plasti c composites . Th e promulgatio n o f thi s NESHA P woul d affec t th e Nort hAmerica n Industria l Classificatio n Syste m(NAICS ) an d Standar d Industria l Classificatio n (SIC ) code s liste d i n th e followin g table . POTENTIALL Y REGULATE D ENTITIE S Categor y NAIC S

cod e SI C

cod e Example s o f regulate d entitie s Industr y 32599 1

32612 2 32619 1 32619 9 32799 1 33621 1 33621 3 33621 4 308 7

308 4 308 9 308 8 308 9 399 9 328 1 371 3 371 6 379 2 Reinforce d plasti c composite s productio n facilitie s tha t manufactur e and/o r repai r intermediat e and/o r fina l product s usin g HA P containin g thermose t resin s an d ge l coats .

Federa l Governmen t Federall yowne d facilitie s tha t manufactur e and/o r repai r intermediat e and/o r fina l product s usin g HA P containin g thermose t resin s an d ge l coats . Thi s tabl e i s no t intende d t o b e exhaustive , bu t rathe r provide s a guid e fo r reader s regardin g entitie s likel yt o b e regulate d b ythi s action . T o determin e whethe r you r facilit yi s regulate d b ythi s action , yo u shoul d examin e th e applicabilit yP.1 3



## criteri a i n sectio n II. Ao f th e preambl e o f th e propose d rul e publishe d i n th e FEDERA L REGISTER . 

# (b) Information Requested Attachmen t 1 present s th e lis t o f th e sourc e dat a an d informatio n requirements . Table s 1 throug h4 o f attachmen t 2 presen t a listin g o f informatio n an d recordkeepin g activities . (i ) Dat a items , includin g recordkeepin g requirements : Tes t report . Facilitie s require d t o us e a n add-o n contro l devic e wil l b e require d t o instal l a continuou s paramete r monitorin g system ; establis hoperatin g parameters ; prepar e a start-up , shutdown , an d malfunctio n plan ; an d submi t a notificatio n o f performanc e test s an d a n initia l add-o n contro l devic e performanc e tes t report . Initia l report . Th e owne r o r operato r o f eac hfacilit y woul d b e require d t o submi t a n initia l notificatio n repor t tha t th e sourc e i s subjec t t o th e standard . Notificatio n reports . Th e owne r o r operato r o f eac hne w facilit ywoul d b e require d t o submi t notification s o f inten t t o construct , constructio n star t date , anticipate d start-u p date , an d actua l start-u p date . Facilitie s als o woul d b e require d t o submi t a notificatio n o f complianc e status . Complianc e reports . Th e owne r o r operato r o f eac hfacilit y woul d b e require d t o submi t semiannua l complianc e reports . Source s usin g a n add-o n contro l devic e wit hexceedance s woul d nee d t o submi t quarterl ycomplianc e report s an d a reques t t o retur n t o semiannua l complianc e reporting . Tes t reports . Th e owne r o r operato r o f eac hfacilit yusin g add-o n contro l device s mus t submi t a contro l devic e performanc e tes t report , operatin g rang e fo r monitore d parameter s report , an d start-up , shutdown , an d malfunctio n reports . (ii ) Responden t activities : 8P.1 4



## Spreadsheet . Facilitie s complying wit hpoin t valu e limit s o n a weighte d averag e basi s wil l develo p a recordkeepin g system an d ente r informatio n int o th e systemfo r regulate d operations . I f al l facilitie s i n a n operatio n continuousl ymee t a n applicabl e poin t valu e limi t base d o n th e rawmateria l HA P content , facilitie s wil l onl ynee d t o keep copie s o f th e HA P conten t certifications . 5 . Th e Informatio n Collected-Agenc yActivities , Collectio n Methodology , an

d Informatio n Managemen t 

# (a) AgencyActivities Alis t o f Agenc yactivitie s i s provide d i n Table s 5 through7 o f attachmen t 3 . 

# (b) Collection Methodologyand Management Thi s collectio n o f informatio n doe s no t requir e th e us e o f automate d collectio n technique s becaus e o f th e relativel ysmal l numbe r o f respondent s affected . 

# (c) Small

EntityFlexibility Th e EP Aha s determine d tha t 27 8 o f the 35 6 companie s ownin g reinforce d plastic s facilitie s potentiall yaffecte d b ythi s rul e ar e smal l businesses . A s require d b ysectio n 609(b ) o f th e RegulatoryFlexibilit yAc t (RFA) , a s amende d b yth e Smal l Busines s RegulatoryEnforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t (SBREFA) , EPA conducte d outreac ht o smal l entitie s and convene d a Smal l Busines s Advocac yRevie w(SBAR ) Pane l t o obtai n advic e an d recommendation s o f representative s o f th e smal l entitie s tha t potentiall ywoul d b e subjec t t o the rule' s requirements . Thi s Pane l convene d o n Apri l 6 , 2000 . Th e Pane l consiste d o f representative s fromth e Offic e o f Managemen t and Budget , th eP.1 5



## Smal l Busines s Administratio n Offic e o f Advocacy , th e EP ASmal l Busines s Advocac yChair , an d th e Emission s Standard s Divisio n o f th e Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g an d Standard s o f EPA . Th e Pane l wa s advise d b yseventee n smal l entit yrepresentative s (SERs ) fro ma cros s sectio n o f th e differen t industr ysector s potentiall yaffecte d b ythi s rulemaking . Al l pane l recommendation s concernin g minimizin g th e reportin g an d recordkeepin g burde n o n smal l businesse s hav e bee n incorporate d int o th e propose d rule . I n developin g thes e propose d standards , EP Aha s provide d th e maximu mdegre e o f flexibilit yt o minimiz e impact s o n smal l businesse s b yprovidin g severa l differen t complianc e options , severa l o f whic hrequir e a minimu mamoun t o f recordkeepin g an d reportin g requirements . Smal l entitie s tha t woul d b e subjec t t o th e regulatio n woul d no t b e systematicall yimpacte d mor e tha n large r entities . Althoug hth e recordkeepin g requirement s ar e th e sam e fo r smal l an d larg e businesses , EP Aconsider s thes e requirement s th e minimu mneede d t o ensur e complianc e and , therefore , canno t reduc e the mfurthe r fo r smal l businesses . 

# (d) Collection Schedule Yea r 1 include s th e one-tim e activit yo f readin g th e regulatio n an d submittin g notificatio n tha t th e sourc e i s subjec t t o th e standard . Ne wmajo r source s woul d submi t th e followin g one-tim e onl y notifications : inten t t o construct , star t o f constructio n date , anticipate d start-u p date , an d actua l start-u p date . Thes e notification s generall ywoul d b e submitte d withi n 6 0 day s o f th e activity . I n yea r 3 , existin g majo r source s woul d begi n complyin g wit h th e HA P conten t requirements , developin g spreadsheets , an d
1 0P.1 6



## enterin g dat a a s describe d i n sectio n 4(b) . Also , existin g respondent s wh o choos e t o us e add-o n contro l device s woul d begi n complyin g i n th e yea r 3 . Th e EP Aexpect s 1 7 ne wmajo r source s t o b e constructe d fo r eac ho f th e firs t 2 year s an d 1 9 i n th e thir d year . Th e EP A assume s tha t becaus e complianc e i s no t require d unti l yea r 3 fo r existin g facilities , existin g facilitie s wil l wai t unti l yea r 3 t o begi n complyin g wit hth e HA P conten t requirements . 6 . Estimatin g th e Burde n an d Cos t o f th e Collectio n 

# (a) Estimating Respondent Burden Th e EP Aexpect s thi s regulatio n t o affec t 43 3 existin g an d 5 3 ne wRP C manufacturin g facilitie s ove r th e nex t 3 years . Th e averag e numbe r o f respondent s ove r th e nex t thre e year s wil l b e 467 . Table s 1 throug h3 i n attachmen t 2 presen t a n itemize d breakdow n o f th e reportin g an d recordkeepin g requirement s fo r th e respondent s affecte d b ythes e standards . 

# (b) Estimating Respondent Costs Th e informatio n collectio n activitie s fo r source s subjec t t o thes e requirement s ar e presente d i n Table s 1 throug h3 an d summarize d i n tabl e 4 o f attachmen t 2 . Th e tota l cos t fo r eac h responden t activit yinclude s labo r costs , capital/start-u p costs , an d operatin g an d maintenanc e (O&M ) costs . (i ) Estimatin g Labo r Costs . Labo r rates , o n a per-hou r basis , ar e take n fro m informatio n availabl e fro mth e burea u o f labo r statistics . Thes e ar e typica l industr ywag e rate s an d ar e th e sam e a s th e rate s develope d i n th e Nationa l Volatil e Organi c Compoun d Emissio n Standard s fo r Architectura l Coating s rulemaking . Thes e rate s ar e show n i n th e tabl e below .

1 1P.1 7



## A Labo r Clas s

Clerica l Technica l Managemen t B

Bas e labo r rat e fro m th e burea u o f labo r statistic s (BLS ) $11.95/h r $18.86/h r $28.54/h r C

Fring e benefi t loadin g rat e fro m BL S 1.4 1 1.4 3 1.4 0 D

Overhea d an d profi t rat e fro m MW C IC R

1.6 7 1.6 7 1.6 7 E

"Loaded " wag e rat e ( B xC xD )

$28.14/h r $45.04/h r $66.73/h r (ii ) Estimatin g Capital/Start-u p Costs . Th e EP Adoe s no t expec t capita l an d start-u p cost s specificall yfo r reportin g an d recordkeeping . Facilitie s tha t hav e contro l device s wil l hav e t o hav e certai n paramete r monitorin g o f thos e devices . However , w e ar e assumin g thes e monitorin g device s ar e integra l part s o f th e contro l device . Th e availabl e cos t dat a di d no t allo wu s t o specificall ybrea k ou t capita l cost s attributabl e onl yt o reportin g an d recordkeepin g requirements . Othe r initia l costs , suc ha s readin g th e rul e an d on e tim e trainin g costs , wer e no t treate d a s a capita l cos t an d amortized . Thes e cost s ar e expense d i n th e yea r the yoccur . Fo r th e purpos e o f thi s subpart , EP Aassume s tha t eac howne r o r operato r own s a compute r wit hspreadshee t software . (iii ) Tota l O& M an d Purchas e o f Servic e Costs . Operatin g an d maintenanc e cost s includ e thos e cost s associate d wit hth e genera l upkee p o f startu p capita l equipment , a s wel l a s thos e cost s associate d wit ha paperwor k requiremen t incurre d continuousl yove r th e lif e o f th e ICR . Fo r example , th e O& M cost s fo r rule s tha t requir e respondent s t o submi t report s t o th e Agenc yan d maintai n record s shoul d b e estimate d a s cost s fo r fil e storage , photocopying , an d postage . Fil e storag e an d
1 2P.1 8



## photocopyin g cost s pe r respons e ar e estimate d a s $12.5 0 pe r hou r o f clerica l labor . Firs t clas s postag e i s estimate d a t $7.6 3 pe r respons e fo r mailin g t o regulator yagencies . Th e estimate d operation , maintenance , an d purchas e o f service s cost s average d ove r th e firs t 3 year s ar e expecte d t o b e $17,265 . 

## (c) Estimating AgencyBurden and Cost. Becaus e th e ICR s wer e develope d a s a n incidenta l par t o f standard s development , n o cost s ca n b e attribute d t o th e developmen t o f ICRs . Becaus e reportin g an d recordkeepin g requirement s o n th e par t o f th e respondent s ar e require d unde r sectio n 11 2 o f th e CAA , n o additiona l operationa l cost s woul d b e incurre d b yth e Federa l Government . Examinatio n o f record s t o b e maintaine d b yth e respondent s woul d occu r incidentall ya s par t o f th e periodi c inspectio n o f source s tha t i s par t o f EPA' s overal l complianc e an d enforcemen t progra mand , therefore , coul d no t b e attributabl e t o th e ICR . Alis t o f Agenc yactivitie s i s provide d i n table s 5 throug h7 i n attachmen t 3 . Labo r rate s fo r th e Federa l employee s ar e base d o n th e estimate d hourl yrate s o f $40.3 2 fo r technica l personne l (GS-12 , Ste p 5) ; $66.5 6 fo r managemen t personne l (GS-15 , Ste p 5) ; an d $22.7 4 fo r clerica l personne l (GS-7 , Ste p 5) . Thes e value s includ e a 1. 6 multiplie r t o accoun t fo r overhea d an d fring e benefi t costs . 

## (d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and

Total Burden Costs. Th e tota l numbe r o f respondent s als o i s referre d t o a s th e responden t universe . Th e responden t univers e fo r thi s IC R i s base d o n EPA' s RP C manufacturin g dat a base . Industr yburde n i s

1 3P.1 9



## calculate d base d o n th e assumptio n tha t 1 7 ne wRP C manufacturin g facilitie s wil l b e constructe d year s 1 an d 2 an d 1 9 i n yea r 3 . Additiona l estimate s regardin g th e responden t univers e ar e include d i n th e industr yburde n determination . I n yea r 1 , ne w RP C manufacturin g facilitie s wil l rea d th e rule , develo p th e recordkeepin g syste m(spreadsheet) , an d ente r th e information . Fo r eac hyear , 1 7 ne wfacilitie s (1 9 i n yea r 3 ) wil l submi t initia l notification s fo r ne wfacilities , complianc e status , an d semiannua l complianc e statu s reports . I n yea r 2 , 3 4 ne wRP C manufacturin g facilitie s wil l develo p th e recordkeepin g system , ente r th e information , an d submi t semiannua l complianc e statu s reports . I n yea r 3 , th e 43 3 existin g manufacturin g facilitie s wil l submi t a n initia l notificatio n tha t th e existin g sourc e i s subjec t t o th e standard , develo p an d ente r informatio n int o th e recordkeepin g system , an d submi t notificatio n o f complianc e status . 

## (e) BottomLine Burden Hours and Cost Tables. (i ) Th e Responden t Tally . Abreakdow n fo r eac ho f th e collection , reporting , an d recordkeepin g activitie s require d b y th e regulatio n i s presente d i n table s 1 throug h3 o f attachmen t 2 . Th e estimat e o f tota l annua l hour s requeste d fro mth e respondent s i s base d o n th e assumption s outline d i n sectio n 6(d ) o f thi s supportin g statement . Th e EP Aestimate d th e responden t burde n b ytotalin g th e hour s fo r th e firs t 3 year s afte r th e implementatio n o f th e regulatio n fo r technical , managerial , an d clerica l staf f a t th e facility . Thi s tota l wa s the n divide d b y3 t o arriv e a t th e averag e annualize d burde n i n th e firs t 3 year s followin g promulgatio n (se e tabl e 4) . Asimila r approac hwa s take n fo r estimatin g averag e annua l labo r an d non-labo r costs . Fo r th e firs t 3 year s afte r th e implementatio n o f th e regulation , EP Aestimate s tha t industr ywoul d expen d 15,12 2 hour s annuall ya t
1 4P.2 0



## a cos t o f $690,38 5 pe r yea r t o mee t th e monitoring , recordkeeping , an d reportin g requirements . Th e averag e annua l operatio n an d maintenanc e cos t i s expecte d t o b e $17,26 5 (se e tabl e 4) . (ii ) Th e Agenc yTally . Th e botto mlin e agenc yburde n hour s an d costs , presente d i n table s 5 throug h7 , ar e calculate d b y totalin g th e hour s pe r yea r fo r technical , managerial , an d clerica l staff , an d b ytotalin g th e cos t column . Tabl e 8 (attachmen t 3 ) summarize s th e agenc yburde n fo r eac ho f th e firs t 3 year s an d calculate s th e averag e annua l burde n b ydividin g th e 3 yea r tota l b y3 . Th e estimate d averag e annua l burden , ove r th e firs t 3 years , fo r th e Agenc ywoul d b e 11,29 3 hour s a t a cos t o f $450,97 2 pe r year . (iii ) Variation s i n th e Annua l Botto mLine . Calculatin g th e averag e annua l cost s underestimate s cost s i n a typica l yea r fo r a NESHAP . I n year s 1 an d 2 , 43 3 source s ar e no t included . Calculatin g eac hyea r individuall yprovide s a mor e accurat e accoun t o f ho wfacilitie s wil l b e affecte d i n th e firs t 3 year s followin g promulgation . Durin g year s 1 an d 2 , ther e i s littl e burde n fo r existin g facilitie s becaus e existin g facilitie s ar e no t require d t o begi n complianc e unti l yea r 3 . Therefore , th e yea r 3 burde n fo r industr yan d th e governmen t i s muc hhighe r tha n year s 1 an d 2 . 

## (f) Reasons for

Change in Burden Thi s i s a ne wcollectio n an d ther e i s n o chang e i n burden . 

## (g) Burden Statement Burde n mean s th e tota l time , effort , o r financia l resource s expende d b yperson s t o generate , maintain , retain , o r disclos e o r provid e informatio n t o o r fo r a Federa l agency . Thi s include s 1 5P.2 1



## th e tim e neede d t o revie winstructions ; develop , acquire , install , an d utiliz e technolog yan d system s fo r th e purpose s o f collecting , validating , an d verifyin g information , processin g an d maintainin g information , an d disclosin g an d providin g information ; adjus t th e existin g way s t o compl ywit han y previousl yapplicabl e instruction s an d requirements ; trai n personne l t o b e abl e t o respon d t o a collectio n o f information ; searc hdat a sources ; complet e an d revie wth e collectio n o f information ; an d transmi t o r otherwis e disclos e th e information . A n Agenc yma yno t conduc t o r sponsor , an d a perso n i s no t require d t o respon d t o a collectio n o f informatio n unles s i t display s a currentl yvali d OM B contro l number . Th e OM B contro l number s fo r EPA' s regulation s ar e liste d i n 4 0 CF R par t 9 an d 4 8 CF R chapte r 15 . Comment s ar e requeste d o n th e Agency' s nee d fo r thi s information , th e accurac yo f th e provide d burde n estimates , an d an ysuggeste d method s fo r minimizin g responden t burden , includin g throug hth e us e o f automate d collectio n techniques . Sen d comment s o n th e IC R t o th e Director , Offic e o f Environmenta l Information , Collectio n Strategie s Divisio n (2822) , U.S . EPA , 120 0 Pennsylvani a Avenu e NW , Washington , D C 20460 ; an d t o th e Offic e o f Informatio n an d Regulator yAffairs , OMB , 72 5 17t h Street , NW , Washington , D C 20503 , marke d "Attention : Des k Office r fo r EPA. " Includ e th e IC R numbe r i n an ycorrespondence .

1 6P.2 2



## Attachmen t 1 Sourc e Dat a an d Informatio n Requirement s Requiremen t 4 0 CF R par t 6 3 RECORDKEEPIN G 5-yea r retentio n o f record s 63.5764(b ) Recordkeepin g requirement s fo r 63.10(b)(3 ) applicabilit ydetermination s Cop yo f eac hnotificatio n an d 63.5764(a ) an d (b ) repor t a s submitte d an d associate d documentatio n Recordkeepin g relevan t t o 63.10(b)(2)(i)throug h(xi ) start-up , shutdown , an d malfunctio n period s an d continuou s monitorin g syste m Genera l recordkeepin g 63.10(b)(2 ) REPORTIN G Initia l notificatio n fo r 63.5755(a ) existin g source s Notificatio n o f inten t t o 63.5755(a ) construc t Notificatio n o f star t 63. 5 constructio n Notificatio n o f anticipate d 63. 5 start-u p dat e Notificatio n o f actua l start
- 63. 5 u p dat e Notificatio n o f complianc e 63.5755(a ) statu s Notificatio n o f performanc e 63.5755(a ) tes t Notificatio n o f CEM S 63.5755(a ) performanc e evaluatio n Semi-annua l complianc e repor t 63.5758(b ) an d (c ) Start-up , shutdown , an d 63.5758(d ) malfunctio n pla nP.2 3



## Attachmen t 2 TABLE S 1 , 2 , 3 , an d 4
Tabl e 1 : Annua l Responden t Burde n an d Cos t o f

Recordkeepin g an d Reportin g Requirement s fo r Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fo r RP C Manufacturing--4 0 CF R Par t 63 , Subpar t WWW W- Yea r 1 Tabl e 2 : Annua l Responden t Burde n an d Cos t o f

Recordkeepin g an d Reportin g Requirement s fo r Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fo r RP C Manufacturing--4 0 CF R Par t 63 , Subpar t WWW W- Yea r 2 Tabl e 3 : Annua l Responden t Burde n an d Cos t o f

Recordkeepin g an d Reportin g Requirement s fo r Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fo r RP C Manufacturing--4 0 CF R Par t 63 , Subpar t WWW W- Yea r 3 Tabl e 4 : Summar yo f Responden t Burde n an d Cos t o f

Recordkeepin g an d Reportin g Requirement s fo r Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fo r RP C Manufacturing--4 0 CF R Par t 63 , Subpar t WWW W- Year s 1 throug h3 an d Averag eTABL E 1
. RESPONDEN TCOST S FO R YEA R 1
.
Burde n Ite m Plan t Hour s pe r Occurrence (A) Numbe ro

fPlan t Occurrence s Hour

s pe rPlan t (B ) ( C = AXB ) Numbe ro f Plants a (D) a Technica l

Personne l Hour s (E=CxD ) Managemen t

Personne l Hour s (F=Ex0.05 ) Clerica l

Personne l Hour s (G=Ex0.1 ) Tota l Labo r

Cost s b (H ) O& M

Cost s (l ) Tota l

Cost s (J=H+I ) Footnote s

1
. Application s 2
. Surveyan d Studie s 3
. Acquire an d instal l recordkeepin g technolog yan d system s 4
. Rea d an d understan d rul e requirement s A
. Facilitie s wit h 2 group s o foperation s B
. Facilitie s wit h 3 group s o foperation s C
. Facilitie s wit h 4 group s o foperation s D
. Facilitie s wit h 5 group s o foperation s E
. Facilitie s wit h 6 group s o foperation s F
. Facilitie s wit h 7 group s o foperation s 5
. Require d activitie s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s A
. Initia l add-o n contro l devic e performanc e test an d repo r B
. Establis h operatin g parameters C
. Prepare startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla n D
. Prepare operatio n an d maintenanc e pla n E
. Continuou s paramete rmonitorin g 1 ) Initia l costs 2 ) Annua l cost s 6
. Employe e Trainin g Requirement s A
. Developmen t o

foperato rtrainin g cours e B
. Tim e t o trai n personne l 1 ) Smal l facilitie s (10 0 o rfewe remployees ) 2 ) Mediu m facilitie s (more tha n 100 t o 25 0 employees ) 3 ) Larg e facilitie s (more tha n 25 0 employees ) C
. Record s o

foperato rcompletin g trainin g cours e 7
. Require d activitie s fo rrecordkeepin g system s A
. Develo p recordkeepin g syste m (spreadsheets ) 1 ) Develo p syste m fo rlowHA P resin s 2 ) Develo p syste m fo rwor k practice s 3 ) Develo p syste m fo radd-o n contro l device s B
. Ente rinformatio n int o recordkeepin g syste m 1 ) Ente rinformatio n o n lo wHA P resin s 2 ) Ente rinformatio n o n wor k practice s 3) Ente rinfonnatio n o n add-o n contro l device s 8
. Creat e Informatio n 9
. Gathe rinformatio n n/ a n/ a n/ a 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 32 0 Include d i n 5

A 2 0 40 0 0

4 1 2 1 0 n/ a n/ a Include d i n 7 B Include d i n 7 B 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 24

5 7 23 3 12 8 7 1 24 0

62 7 2,79 6 1,664 9 8 1 5 12. 0

31. 4 139. 8 83. 2 4. 9 0. 8 24. 0

62. 7 279. 6 166. 4 9. 8 1. 5 $12,28 6

$32,09 6 $143,12 9 $85,18 1 $5,01 7 $76 8 $12,28 6 $32,09 6 $143,12 9 $85,18 1 $5,01 7 $76 8 32 0

4 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 7

1 4 2 1 1 7
2 1 7 1 2 1 7 1 32 0

13 6 2 8 7 1 0 3 4
8 1 7 2 2 0 0 0 16. 0 32. 0 $16,38 1

6. 8 1.4 0. 4 0. 5 1. 7
0. 4 0. 9 0. 1 1. 0 0. 0 0. 0 13. 6 $6,96 2 $40 0

$17 0 $16,78 1 2 0 40 0 0 1

1 0 0 2 0

4 0 0 0 1. 0

2. 0 0. 0 0. 0 2. 0

4. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $1,02 4

$2,04 8 $ 0 $ 0 $2 5

$5 0 $ 0 $ 0 $1,04 9

$2,09 8 $ 0 $ 0 $7,13 2 2. 8 0. 7 1. 0 3. 4
0. 8 1. 7 0. 2 2. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $1,43 1

$36 2 $51 5 $1,74 0 $41 0 $87 0 $10 2 $1,02 4 $ 0 $ 0 $3 5

$ 9 $1 3 $4 3 $1 0 $2 1 $ 3 $2 5 $ 0 $ 0 $1,46 6

$37 1 $52 8 $1,78 3 $42 0 $89 1 $10 5 $1,04 9 $ 0 $ 0

2- 1TABL E 1
. RESPONDEN TCOST S FO R FIRS TYEA R 1 (continued ) n/ a
2 2 2 n/ a n/ a 2 4 1 0 Notificatio n requirements A
. Initia l notificatio n that existin g source s are subjec t t o the Standar d B
. Notification s fo rne

wmajo rsource s 1 ) Notificatio n o

fstar t o fconstructio n 2 ) Notificatio n o

fanticipate d startu p dat e 3 ) Notificatio n o

factua l startu p dat e C
. Reques

t fo rcompliance extensio n D
. Notificatio n o

fspecia l complianc e requirement s E
. Notificatio n o

fperformance test s F
. Notificatio n o

fcompliance statu s 1 1 Recordkeepin g requirements A
. Read instruction s Include d i n 4 B
. Pla n an d develo p record syste m Include d i n 7A
. C
. Recor d informatio n Include d i n 7B
. D
. Record s fo rare a source s not subjec t t o th e standard n/ a 1 2 Reportin g requirements A
. Semiannua l compliance report s fo ral l source s 1 ) N o exceedance s 8 2 ) Wit h exceedance s 1 6 B
. Additiona l reports fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s 1 ) Contro l device performance test repor t Include d i n 5A
. 2 ) Operatin g rang e fo rmonitore d parameter s Include d i n 5A
. 3) Startup , shutdown , malfunctio n report s 2 8 1 6 1 7

1 7 1 7
1 1 7

13. 6 3. 4 3 4

34 3 4
2 6 8

10 9 5 4 0. 0

0. 1 3. 4 0. 0

5. 4 2. 7

0. 1 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

3. 4 3. 4 3. 4
0. 2 6. 8 $1,74 0

$1,74 0 $1,74 0 $10 2 $3,48 1 $17 2

$17 2 $17 2 $1 0 $21 5 $1,91 2

$1,91 2 $1,91 2 $11 2 $3,69 6

10. 9 $5,57 0 $24 0 $5,81 0 5. 4 $2,78 5 $9 3 $2,87 8 f. g f , h

0. 2 $10 2 $1 0 $11 2 TOTA LNUMBE R O F PLANT S TOTA LBURDE N ANNUA LCOSTS TOTA LANNUA LHOUR S 45 0 6,41 9 32 1 $328,60 6 $1,88 7 $330,49 3 64 2 7,38 2 FOOTNOTE S a Base d o n 1 7 newfacilitie s beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r1 an d 43 3 existin g facilities
. b Costs are base d o n th e followin g hourl yrate s (th e cost s are loade d rates) : Technica l $45.04 , Managemen t$66.73 , an d clerica l $28.14

. cApplie s onl yt o ne

wfacilitie s wit h a n add-o n contro l device
. d Applie s t o th e 1 7 newfacilitie s beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r1
. e Applie s onl yt o ne

wfacilitie s wit h ope n moldin g and/o rcentrifuga l castin g operations
. fAssume s that on e semiannua l repor t wil l b e require d i n th e firs t yea ro foperation
. g Assume s 8 0 percen t o fth e 1 7 facilitie s prepare a semiannua l compliance repor t indicatin g n o exceedances
. h Assume s 2 0 percen t o fth e 1 7 facilitie s prepare a semiannua l complianc e repor t indicatin g a n exceedance
.

2- 2TABL E 2
. RESPONDEN TCOSTS I N YEA R 2
.

Costs fo rfacilitie s that star t u p i n yea r2

Burde n Ite m Plan t Hour s pe r Occurrenc e Numbe rof

Occurrence s pe rPlan t (B ) Plan t

Hour s ( C = AXB ) Numbe ro f Plant s a (D) a Technica l

Personne l Hour s (E=CxD ) Managemen t

Personne l Hour s (F=Ex0.05 ) Clerica l

Personne l Hour s (G=Ex0.1 ) Total Labo r

Cost s b (H ) O& M

Cost s ( D Tota l

Cost s (J=H+I ) Footnote s
1 . Application s n/ a 2 . Surveyan d Studie s n/ a 3 . Acquire an d instal l recordkeepin g technolog yan d system s n/ a 4 . Rea d an d understan d rul e requirement s A . Facilitie s wit h 2 group s o foperation s 1 0 B . Facilitie s wit h 3 group s o foperation s 1 1 C . Facilitie s wit h 4 group s o foperation s 1 2 D . Facilitie s wit h 5 group s ofoperation s 1 3 E . Facilitie s wit h 6 group s o foperation s 1 4 F . Facilitie s wit h 7 group s o foperation s 1 5 5 . Require d activitie s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s A . Initia l add-o n contro l devic e performanc e tes t an d repor t 32 0 B . Establis h operatin g parameter s Include d i n 5 A C . Prepar e startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla n 2 0 0 . Prepar e operatio n an d maintenanc e pla n 4 0 E . Continuou s paramete rmonitorin g 1 ) Initia l cost s 0 2 ) Annua l cost s 0 6 . Employe e Trainin g Requirement s A . Developmen t o

foperato rtrainin g cours e 8 B . Tim e to trai n personne l 1 ) Smal l facilitie s (10 0 o rfewe remployees ) 2 2 ) Mediu m facilitie s (more than10 0 t o 25 0 employees ) 4 3 ) Larg e facilitie s (mor e tha n 25 0 employees ) 8 C . Record s o

foperato rcompletin g trainin g cours e 2 7 . Require d activie s fo rrecordkeepin g system s A . Develo p recordkeepin g syste m (spreadsheets ) 1 ) Develo p syste m fo rlo wHA P resin s 4 2 ) Develo p syste m fo rwor k practice s 1 3 ) Develo p syste m fo radd-o n contro l device s 2 B . Ente rinformatio n into recordkeepin g syste m 1 ) Ente rinformatio n o n lo wHA P resin s 1 0 2 ) Ente rinformatio n o n wor k practice s n/ a 3 ) Ente rinfonnatio n o n add-o n contro l device s n/ a 8 . Creat e Informatio n Include d i n 7 B 9 . Gathe rinformatio n Include d i n 7 B 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 0

0 8 8 0 1 0

0 9 6 10 4 0 1 5 0. 0

0. 0 4. 8 5. 2 0. 0 0. 8 0. 0

0. 0 9. 6 10. 4 0. 0 •1. 5 $ 0

$ 0 $4,91 4 $5,32 4 $ 0 $76 8 32 0 64 0

13 6 32. 0 $32,76 2 $80 0

6. 8 13. 6 $6,96 2 $17 0 $ 0 $ 0 $4,91 4 $5,32 4 $ 0 $76 8 $33,56 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 2

2 0 O 4 0

8 0 0 0 2. 0

4. 0 0. 0 0. 0 4. 0

8. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $2,04 8

$4,09 5 $ 0 $ 0 $5 0

$10 0 s o $ 0 $2,09 8

$4,19 5 $ 0 $ 0 $7,13 2 2 4 8 2
4 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 4

2 1 1 7
0 1 7 2 0 1 7 2 2 8

7 1 0 3 4
0 1 7 4 0 0 0 1. 4

0. 4 0. 5 1. 7
0. 0 0. 9 0. 2 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 2. 8

0. 7 1. 0 3. 4
0. 0 1. 7 0. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $1,43 1

$36 2 $51 5 $1,74 0 $ 0 $87 0 $20 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $3 5

$ 9 $1 3 $4 3 $ 0 $2 1 $ 5 $ 0 $ 0 s o $1,46 6

$37 1 $52 8 $1,78 3 $ 0 $89 1 $21 0 $ 0 $ 0 s o d

c d
c

2- 3TABL E 2 . RESPONDEN TCOST S I N YEA R 2 . (Continued )

1 0 Notificatio n requirement s A . Initia l notificatio n that existin g source s ar e subject to th e Standar d B . Notification s fo rnewmajo rsource s 1 ) Notificatio n o

fstart o fconstructio n 2 ) Notificatio n o

fanticipate d startu p dat e 3 ) Notificatio n ofactua l startu p dat e C . Reques t fo rcomplianc e extentio n D . Notificatio n o

fspecia l complianc e requirement s E . Notificatio n o

fperformanc e test s F . Notificatio n o

fcomplianc e statu s 1 1 Recordkeepin g requirement s A . Rea d instruction s B . Pla n an d develo p recor d syste m C . Recor d informatio n D . Record s fo rare a source s no t subject to th e standar d 1 2 Reportin g requirement s A . Semiannua l complianc e reports fo ral l source s 1 ) N o exceedance s 2 ) Wit h exceedance s B . Additiona l reports fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s 1 ) Contro l devic e performanc e tes t repor t 2 ) Operatin g rang e fo rmonitore d parameter s 3 ) Startup , shutdown , malfunctio n report s n/ a
2 2 2 n/ a n/ a 2 4 Include d i n 4 . Include d i n 7A . Include d i n 7B . n/ a
8 1 6 Include d i n 5A . Include d i n 5A . 2 1

1 1
1 1

1 1

1 0. 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

2 2 2
2 4 1 7

1 7 1 7
2 1 7 3 4

3 4 3 4
4 6 8 1. 7

1. 7 1. 7
0. 2 3. 4 3. 4

3. 4 3. 4
0. 4 6. 8 $1,74 0

$1,74 0 $1,74 0 $20 5 $3,48 1 $17 2

$17 2 $17 2 $2 0 $21 5 $1,91 2

$1,91 2 $1,91 2 $22 5 $3,69 6

8 1 6 1 4

3. 4 10 9

5 4 5. 4

2. 7 10. 9

5. 4 $5,57 0

$2,78 5 $16 1

$5 3 $5,73 1

$2,83 8 e, f

e. g c 0. 1 0. 2 $10 2 $1 0 $11 2 TOTA L NUMBE R O F PLANT S TOTA L BURDE N ANNUA L COST S TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 1 7 1,55 0 78 15 5 $79,36 0 1,78 3 $2,22 0 $81,58 0

FOOTNOTE S Base d o n 1 7 newfacilitie s beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r2 . Cost s ar e base d o n th e followin g hourl yrate s (th e cost s ar e loade d rates) : Technica l $45.04 , Managemen t $66.73 , an d clerica l $28.14 . Applie s onl yto facilitie s wit h a n add-o n contro l device . Applie s onl yt o facilitie s wit h ope n moldin g and/o rcentrifuga l castin g operations . Assume s that on e semiannua l repor t wil l b e require d i n th e firs t yea rofoperation . Assume s 8 0 percen t o fth e 1 7 facilitie s prepar e a semiannua l complianc e repor t indicatin g n o exceedances . Assume s 2 0 percen t ofth e 1 7 facilitie s prepar e a semiannua l complianc e repor t indicatin g a n exceedance.

2- 4

ro ^ iTABL E 2
. RESPONDEN TCOSTS I N YEA R 2
. (Continued )

Costs fo rExistin g facilitie s an d Facilitie s that Starte d U p i n Yea r1

Burde n Ite m 1 . Application s "~TM — " " " 2 . Surveyan d Studie s 3 . Acquire an d instal l recordkeepin g technolog yan d system s 4 . Rea d an d understan d rul e requirement s A . Facilitie s wit h 2 group s o foperation s B . Facilitie s wit h 3 group s o foperation s C . Facilitie s wit h 4 group s o foperation s D . Facilitie s wit h 5 group s ofoperation s E . Facilitie s wit h 6 group s o foperation s F . Facilitie s wit h 7 group s o foperation s 5 . Require d activitie s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s A . Initia l add-o n contro l devic e performanc e test an d repor t B . Establis h operatin g parameter s C . Prepar e startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla n D . Prepar e operatio n an d maintenanc e pla n E . Continuou s paramete rmonitorin g 1 ) Initia l cost s 2 ) Annua l cost s 6 . Employe e Trainin g Requirement s A . Developmen t o

foperato rtrainin g cours e B . Tim e to trai n personne l 1 ) Smal l facilitie s (10 0 o rfewe remployees ) 2 ) Mediu m facilitie s (more tha n 10 0 t o 25 0 employees ) 3 ) Larg e facilitie s (more tha n 25 0 employees ) C . Record s ofoperato rcompletin g trainin g cours e 7 . Require d aclrvie s fo rrecordkeepin g system s A . Develo p recordkeepin g syste m (spreadsheets ) 1 ) Develo p syste m fo rlo wHA P resin s 2 ) Develo p syste m fo rwor k practice s 3 ) Develo p syste m fo radd-o n contro l device s B . Ente rinformatio n int o recordkeepin g syste m 1 ) Ente rinformatio n o n lowHA P resin s 2 ) Ente rinformatio n o n wo * practice s 3 ) Ente rinformatio n o n add-o n contro l device s 8 . Creat e Informatio n 9 . Gathe rinformatio n Plan t Hour s pe r Occurrenc e (A ) n/ a n/ a n/ a Numbe ro f Occurrence s pe rPlan t (B ) Plan t

Hour s ( C = AXB ) Numbe ro f Plant s a (D) a Technica l

Personne l Hour s (E=CxD ) Managemen t

Personne l Hour s (F=Ex0.05 ) Clerica l

Personne l Hour s (G=Ex0.1 ) Total Labo r

Cost s b (H ) O& M

Cost s (I ) Tota l

Cost s (J=H+I ) Footnote s

Include d i n 5 A 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 1 0 n/ a n/ a Include d i n 7 B Include d i n 7 B 1 0 1 0 1 7 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 4 0. 5 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 7 1. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

$ 0 $35 8 $51 2 $ 0 $ 0

1 7 0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

0. 0 0. 0 $ 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0

$ 0 $35 8 $51 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 0 0 1

1 0 0 0

0 0 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4

2 1 1 7
2 1 7 1 2 1 7 1 0

0 0 3 4
0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0 1. 7
0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 1. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0 3. 4
0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 2. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $1,74 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $1,02 4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $4 3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 S2 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $1,78 3 $ 0 s o $ 0 $1,04 9 $ 0 $ 0 d

c d
c

2- 5TABL E 2 . RESPONDEN TCOST S I N YEA R 2 . (Continued )

1 0 Notificatio n requirement s A . Initia l notificatio n that existin g source s ar e subject t o th e Sta n B . Notification s fo rnewmajo rsource s 1 ) Notificatio n o

fstart o fconstructio n 2 ) Notificatio n ofanticipate d startu p dat e 3 ) Notificatio n o

factua l startu p dat e C . Reques t fo rcomplianc e extentio n D . Notificatio n o

fspecia l complianc e requirement s E . Notificatio n o

fperformanc e test s F . Notificatio n ofcomplianc e statu s 1 1 Recordkeepin g requirement s A . Rea d instruction s B . Pla n an d develo p recor d syste m C . Recor d infonnatio n D . Record s fo rare a source s not subjec t to th e standar d 1 2 Reportin g requirement s A . Semiannua l complianc e reports fo ral l source s 1 ) N o exceedance s 2 ) Wit h exceedance s B . Additiona l report s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s 1 ) Contro l devic e performanc e test repor t 2 ) Operatin g rang e fo rmonitore d parameter s 3 ) Startup , shutdown , malfunctio n reports n/ a 0 0 0 n/ a n/ a 0 0 Include d i n 4 . Include d i n 7A . Include d i n 7B . n/ a
8 1 6 Include d i n 5A . Include d i n 5A . 2 1

1 1
1 1

2 2

1 1 6

3 2 1 4

3. 4 21 8

10 9 0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

10. 9 5. 4

0. 1 21. 8

10. 9

0. 2 $11,13 9

$5,57 0
$10 2 $ 0

$37 9 $16 2
$1 0 $ 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 7

1 7 1 7
1 1 7 0

0 0
0 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0
0. 0 0. 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0
0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 s o $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

$11,51 8 $5,73 2
$11 2 TOTA L NUMBE R O F PLANT S TOTA L BURDE N ANNUA L COST S TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 39 9 2 0 4 0 $20,44 5 45 9 $61 9 $21,06 4
FOOTNOTE S
a Base d o n th e 1 7 facilitie s that bega n operatio n i n Yea r1 . b Cost s are base d o n th e followin g hourl yrate s (th e cost s ar e loade d rates) : Technica l $45.04 , Managemen t $66.73 , an d clerica l $28.14 . c Applie s onl yto facilitie s wit h a n add-o n contro l device . d Applie s onl yto facilitie s wit h ope n moldin g and/o rcentrifuga l castin g operations . e Assume s 8 0 percen t o fth e 1 7 facilitie s prepar e a semiannua l complianc e repor t indicatin g n o exceedances . fAssume s 2 0 percen t o fth e 1 7 facilitie s prepar e a semiannua l complianc e repor t indicatin g a n exceedance . Tota l Yea r2 Costs fo rAl l Facilitie s

TOTA L NUMBE R O F PLANT S TOTA L BURDE N ANNUA L COST S TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 3 4 1,95 0 9 7 19 5 3 4 $102,64 4 2,24 2

2- 6Cost s fo rFacilitie s tha t Star t U p i n Yea r3 TABL E 3 . RESPONDEN TCOST S I N YEA R 3 .

Burde n Ite m Plan t Hour s pe r Occurrence (A) Numbe ro f Occurrences pe rPlan t (B ) 

### res—

Hour s ( C = A XB) Numbero f Plant s a (D) a lechnica l

Personne l Hour s (E=CxD ) Managemen t

Personne l Hour s (F=Ex0.05 ) Clerica l

Personne l Hour s (G=Ex0.1 ) Tota l Labo r

Cost s b (H ) flAM

Cost s (I ) Tota l

Costs (J=H+I ) Footnotes

1 . Application s 2 . Surveyan d Studie s 3 . Acquir e an d Instal l recordkeepin g technolog yan d system s 4 . Read an d understan d rul e requirement s A . Facilities wit h 2 group s o foperation s B . Facilities wit h 3 group s o foperation s C . Facilities wit h 4 group s o foperation s D . Facilities wit h 5 group s o foperation s E . Facilities wit h 6 group s o foperation s F . Facilities wit h 7 group s o foperation s 5 . Require d activitie s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s A . Initia l add-o n contro l devic e performanc e tes t an d repor t B . Establis h operatin g parameters C Prepare startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla n D . Prepare operatio n an d maintenanc e pla n E . Continuou s paramete rmonitorin g 1 ) Initia l cost s 2 ) Annua l cost s 6 . Employe e Trainin g Requirement s A . Developmen t ofoperato rtrainin g cours e B . Tim e t o trai n personne l 1 ) Smal l facilitie s (10 0 o rfewe remployees ) 2 ) Mediu m facilitie s (more thanlO O t o 2S 0 employees ) 3 ) Larg e facilitie s (more tha n 2S0 employees ) C Record s o foperato rcompletin g trainin g cours e 7 . Require d actlvle s fo rrecordkeeping system s A . Develo p recordkeeping syste m (spreadsheets ) 1 ) Develo p syste m fo rlo wHA P resin s 2 ) Develo p syste m fo rwor k practice s 3 ) Develo p syste m fo radd-o n contro l device s B . Ente rInformatio n Int o recordkeeping syste m 1 ) Ente rInformatio n o n lo wHA P resin s 2 ) Ente rInformatio n o n wor k practice s 3 ) Ente rInformatio n o n add-o n contro l device s 8 . Create Informatio n 8 . Gathe rInformatio n 1 0 Notificatio n requirement s A . Inttla l notificatio n tha t existin g source s are subjec t t o th e standar d B . Notification s fo rnewmajo rsource s 1 ) Notificatio n ofstar

t ofconstructio n 2 ) Notificatio n ofanticipate d startu p dat e 3 ) Notificatio n ofactua l startu p dat e C Request fo rcomplianc e extentio n D . Notificatio n o fspecia l complianc e requirements E Notificatio n o fperformanc e test s F . Notificatio n ofcomplianc e statu s 1 1 Recordkeepin g requirements A . Rea d Instruction s B . Pla n an d develo p record syste m C Record Informatio n D . Record s fo rare a source s no t subjec t t o th e standar d n/ a n/ a 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 32 0 Included i n 5

A 2 0 4 0 0 0

4 1 2 1 0 n/ a n/ a Included i n 7 B Included I n 7 B n/ a 2 2 2 n/ a n/ a 2 4 Included I n 4 . Included I n 7A . Included I n 7B . n/ a 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 0

0 1 0 9 0 0 0

0 12 0 11 7 0 0 0. 0

0. 0 6. 0 5. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0

0. 0 12. 0 11. 7 0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

$ 0 $6,14 3 $5,98 9 $ 0 $ 0 32 0 10,88 0 1,088. 0 $556,95 3 $13,60 0

180. 8 361. 6 $185,10 5 $4,52 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $6,14 3 $5,98 9 $ 0 $ 0 $570,55 3 2 0 4 0 0 0 3 4

3 4 0 0 68 0

1,360 0 0 34. 0

68. 0 0. 0 0. 0 68. 0

136. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $34,81 0

$69,61 9 $ 0 $ 0 $85 0

$1,70 0 $ 0 $ 0 $35,66 0

$71,31 9 $ 0 $ 0 $189,62 5 2 4 8 2
4 1 2 1 0 0 0 372

47 3 3 45 2
32 2 45 2 3 4 32 2 452 3 4 744

188 26 4 90 4 1,288 45 2 6 8 3,22 0 0 0 37. 2

9. 4 13. 2 45. 2
64. 4 22. 6 3. 4 161. 0 0. 0 0. 0 74. 4

18. 8 26. 4 90. 4
128. 8 45. 2 6. 8 322. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $38,08 6

$9,62 4 $13,51 4 $46,27 6 $65,93 3 $23,13 8 $3,48 1 $164,83 3 $ 0 $ 0 $93 0

$23 5 $33 0 $1,13 0 $1,61 0 $56 5 $8 5 $4,02 5 $ 0 $ 0 $39,01 6

$9,85 9 $13,84 4 $47,40 6 $67,54 3 $23,70 3 $3,56 6 $168,85 8 $ 0 $ 0 f

e d f e d

2 2 2
2 4 1 9

1 9 1 9
3 4 45 2 3 8

3 8 3 8
6 8 1,808 1.9

1.9 1.9
3. 4 90. 4 3. 8

3. 8 3. 8
6. 8 180. 8 $1,94 5

$1,94 5 $1,94 5 $3,48 1 $92,55 2 $33 5

$33 5 $33 5 $34 4 $5,70 9 $2,28 0

$2,28 0 $2,28 0 $3,82 5 $98,26 1

2- 7TABL E 3
. RESPONDEN TCOST S I N YEA R 3 (CONTINUED)
.

1 2 Reportin g requirement s A . Semiannua l complianc e report s fo ral l source s 1 ) N o exceedance s 8 2 ) Wit h exceedance s 1 6 B . Additiona l report s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s 1 ) Contro l devic e performanc e tes t repor t Included I n 5A. 2 } Operatin g rang e fo rmonitore d parameters "included I n 5A . 3 ) Startup , shutdown , malfunctio n report s 2 8 1 6 361. 6

90. 4 2,89 3

1,44 6 144. 6

72. 3 289. 3

144. 6 $148,08 4

$74,04 2 $6,37 5

$2,49 7 $154,45 9

$76,53 9 9 . h

9 . i d $3,48 1 $3,82 5 TOTA L NUMBE RO F PLANT S TOTA L BURDE N

ANNUA L COST S TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 45 2 1,51 5 3,03 0 $1,550,98 0 34,84 3 FOOTNOTE S
a Base d on 1 9 ne

wfacilities beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r3 an d 43 3 existin g facilities demonstratin g complianc e I n Yea r3 . b Cost s ar e based o n th e followin g houdyrates (th e cost s ar e loaded rates) : Technica l $45.04 , Managemen t $66.73 , an d clerica l $28.14 . c Applies onl

yt o th e 1 9 newfacilities beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r3 . d Applies onl

yto ne wfacilities (2 ) an d existin g facilities (32 ) usin g a n add-o n contro l device . e Applies t

o al l ne wan d existin g facilities required to demonstrat e complianc

e I n Yea r3 . fApplies onl

yt o facilities wit h ope n moldin g and/o rcentrifuga l castin g operations . g Assume

s that on e semiannua l repor t wil l b e required I n th e firs

t yea ro foperatio n fo rth e 1 9 ne wfacilities an d th e 43 3 existin g facilities . h Assume

s 8 0 percen t o

fth e 45 2 facilities prepar e a semiannua l complianc e repor t indicatin g n o exceedances . i Assume

s 2 0 percen t o

fth e 45 2 facilities prepar e a semiannua l complianc e repor t Indicatin g a n exceedance .

2- 8

T I C OCost s fo rExistin g Facilitie s an d Facilitie s tha t Starte d U p i n Year s 1 an d 2 TABL E 3 . RESPONDEN TCOST S I N YEA R 3 (Continued) .

Burde n Ite m Hlan t Hour s pe r Occurrence (A ) Numbe ro f Occurrences pe rPlant (B ) Plan t

Hour s ( C = AXB ) Numbe ro f Plants a (D) a Technica l

Personne l Hour s (E=CxD ) Managemen t

Personne l Hour s (F=Ex0.05 ) Clerica l

Personne l Hour s (G=Ex0.1 ) Tota l Labo r

Costs b (H ) —O T

Cost s (I ) Toia l

Cost s (J=H+I ) Footnotes

1 . Application s 2 . Surveyan d Studie s 3 . Acquire an d Instal l recordkeepin g technolog yan d system s 4 . Read an d understan d rul e requirement s A . Facilities wit h 2 groups o foperation s B . Facilities wit h 3 groups o foperation s C . Facilities wit h 4 groups o foperation s 0 . Facilities wit h 5 groups o foperation s E . Facilities wit h 6 groups o foperation s F . Facilities wit h 7 groups o foperation s 5 . Require d activitie s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s A . Initia l add-o n contro l devic e performanc e tes t an d repor t B . Establis h operatin g parameters C Prepare startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla n D . Prepare operatio n an d maintenanc e pla n E . Continuou s paramete rmonitorin g 1 ) Initia l cost s 2 ) Annua l cost s 6 . Employe e Trainin g Requirement s A . Developmen t ofoperato rtrainin g cours e B . Tim e t o trai n personne l 1 ) Smal l facilitie s (10 0 o rfewe remployees ) 2 ) Mediu m facilitie s (more thanlO O t o 25 0 employees ) 3 ) Larg e facilitie s (more tha n 25 0 employees ) C Record s ofoperato rcompletin g trainin g cours e 7 . Require d actlvle s fo rrecordkeepin g system s A . Develo p recordkeepin g syste m (spreadsheets ) 1 ) Develo p syste m fo rlo wHA P resin s 2 ) Develo p syste m fo rwor k practice s 3) Develo p syste m fo radd-o n contro l device s B . Ente rInformatio n Int o recordkeepin g syste m 1 ) Ente rInformatio n o n lo wHA P resin s 2 ) Ente rInformatio n o n wor k practice s 3 ) Ente rInformatio n o n add-o n contro l device s 8 . Create Infonnatio n 9 . Gathe rInformatio n 1 0 Notificatio n requirement s A . Initia l notificatio n tha t existin g source s are subject t o th e standar d B . Notification s fo rnewmajo rsource s 1 ) Notificatio n o fstar

t o fconstructio n 2 ) Notificatio n ofanticipate d startu p dat e 3 ) Notificatio n ofactua l startu p dat e C Request fo rcomplianc e extentio n D . Notificatio n o fspecia l complianc e requirement s E . Notificatio n o fperformanc e test s F . Notificatio n o fcomplianc e statu s 1 1 Recordkeepin g requirement s A . Read Instruction s B . Pla n an d develo p recor d syste m C Record Informatio n D . Record s fo rare a source s no t subject t o th e standard n/ a n/ a

Included I n 5

A 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 1 0 n/ a n/ a Included i n 7 B Included i n 7 B n/ a 0 0 0 n/ a n/ a 0 0 Included i n 4 . Included tn 7A . Include d I n 7B . n/ a 1 0 1 0 1 1 5 1 1 8 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 5 1 8 0 1 0. 0

0. 0 0. 8 0. 9 0. 0 0. 1 0. 0

0. 0 1.5 1.8 0. 0 0. 1 $ 0

$ 0 $76 8 $92 1 s o $5 1

$ 0 $ 0

s o s o

s o $76 8 $92 1 S O $5 1 $ 0 0 0 0 0 3

3 0 0 0

0 0 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

$ 0 s o $ 0 s

o S O $ 0 $ 0

0 0 0 2
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 8

4 2 34
2 3 4 3 2 34 3 0

0 0 6 8
0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0 3. 4
0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 1. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0 6. 8
0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 2. 0 0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

s o $ 0 $3,48 1 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $1,02 4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

s o s o $8 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $2 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $3,56 6
S O $ 0 $ 0 $1,04 9 S O $ 0
$ 0 0 0 0
0 0 0

0 0
0 0 0

0 0
0 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0
0. 0 0. 0 0. 0

0. 0 0. 0
0. 0 0. 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 s o $ 0

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

2- 9TABL E 3 . RESPONDEN TCOST S I N YEA R 3 (Continued) .

1 2 Reportin g requirement s A . Semiannua l complianc e report s fo ral l source s 1 ) N o exceedances 8 2 ) Wit h exceedance s 16 B . Additiona l report s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s 1 ) Contro l devic e performanc e tes t repor t Included I n 5A. 2 ) Operatin g rang e fo rmonitore d parameters Included I n 5A. 3 ) Startup , shutdown , malfunctio n report s 2 1 6 3 2 27. 2

6. 8 43 5

21 8 21. 8

10. 9 43. 5

21. 8 $22,27 8

$11,13 9 $75 1

$32 4 $23,02 9

$11,46 3
$30 7 $30 TOTA L NUMBE R O F PLANT S TOTA L BURDE N ANNUA L COST S TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 78 1 $39,970 898 $41,18 5
FOOTNOTE S a Base d o n th e 3 4 facilities that bega n operatio n I n Yea r1 an d Yea r2 . b Cost s are based o n th e followin g hourlyrates (th e cost s ar e loaded rates) : Technica l $45.04 , Managemen t $66.73 , an d clerica l $28.14 . c Applies onl

yt o facilities wit h a n add-o n contro l device . d Applies onl

yt o facilities wit h ope n moldin g and/o rcentrifuga l castin g operations . e Assume

s 80 percent o

fth e 3 4 facilities prepar e a semiannua l complianc e repor t indicatin g n o exceedances . fAssume

s 2 0 percent o

fth e 3 4 facilities prepar e a semiannua l complianc e repor t Indicatin g a n exceedance . Tota l Yea r3 Cost s

TOTA L NUMBE R O F PLANT S TOTA L BURDE N ANNUA L COST S TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 45i 5 31.07 9 1,554 3,10 8 48 6 $1,638,01 9 35,74 1

2-1 0

## TABL E 4 . SUMMAR Y AN D AVERAG E RESPONDEN T BURDE NFO R YEAR S 1- 3

Yea r Technica l Hour s Managemen t Hour s Clerica l Hour s Tota l Hour s Tota l Annua l Labo rCost s Tota l Annua l

O& M Cost s Tota l Annua l

Cost s 

### Year l Yea r 2 Yea r 3 6,41 9 1,95 0 31,07 9 32 1 

### 9 7 1,55 4 64 2

19 5 3,10 8 7,38 2

2,24 2 35,74 1 $328,60 6

$99,80 5 $1,590,95 0 $1,88 7

$2,83 9 $47,06 9 $330,49 3

$102,64 4 $1,638,01 9 Averag e Burde n 

### 15,12 2 $673,12 0 $17,26 5 $690,38 5

2-1 1P.3 5



## Attachmen t 3 TABLE S 5 , 6 , 7 , AN D 8
Tabl e 5 : Annua l Federa l Governmen t Burde n an d Cos t o f

Recordkeepin g an d Reportin g Requirement s fo r th e Standar d o f Performanc e fo r Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fo r RP C Manufacturing--4 0 CF R Par t 63 , Subpar t WWW W- Yea r 1 Tabl e 6 : Annua l Federa l Governmen t Burde n an d Cos t o f

Recordkeepin g an d Reportin g Requirement s fo r th e Standar d o f Performanc e fo r Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fo r RP C Manufacturing--4 0 CF R Par t 63 , Subpar t WWW W- Yea r 2 Tabl e 7 : Annua l Federa l Governmen t Burde n an d Cos t o f

Recordkeepin g an d Reportin g Requirement s fo r th e Standar d o f Performanc e fo r Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fo r RP C Manufacturing--4 0 CF R Par t 63 , Subpar t WWW W- Yea r 3 Tabl e 8 : Annua l Federa l Governmen t Burde n an d Cos t o f

Recordkeepin g an d Reportin g Requirement s fo r th e Standar d o f Performanc e fo r Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s fo r RP C Manufacturing--4 0 CF RPar t 63 , Subpar t WWW W- Year s 1 throug h3 an d Averag eTABL E 5 . AGENC Y REPORTINGAN D RECORDKEEPIN G BURDE NFO R YEA R 1

Burde n Ite m EP Ahour s pe r","L5 [ ° EPAhour s pe rOccurrence s occurrenc e % C TM 8facilit y Technica l hour s Managemen t Clerica l hour s (A ) (B ) ( C - AXB) (D ) ( E = CxO ) (F = E x0.05 ) (6=E«0.1 ) Cost s b (H ) $95,51 8 $6,88 8 $1,56 1 $1,10 2 Footnote s
1 . Litigatio n 2 . Rea d an d understan d rul e requirement s 3 . Ente ran d updateinformatlo n Int o agenc yrecordkeepin g syste m 4 . Require d activitie s to rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s A . Observ e initia l add-o n contro l devic e performanc e tes t B . Observ e repea t performanc e tes t C . Revie woperatin g parameter s D . Reviewcontinuou s paramete rmonitorin g 5 . Exceedanc e Enforcemen t Activitie s an d Inspection s 6 . Notificatio n requirement s A . ReviewInitia l notificatio n tha t existin g source s ar e subjec t t o th e standar d B . Notification s fo rnewmajo rsource s 1 ) Reviewnotificatio n o fInten t t o construc t a ne wmajo rsourc e an d revie wapplicatio n t o co m 2 ) Reviewnotificatio n o fstart o fconstructio n 3 ) Reviewnotificatio n o fanticipate d startu p dat e 4 ) Reviewnotificatio n o factua l startu p dat e C . Reviewreques t fo rcomplianc e extentio n D . Reviewnotificatio n o fspecia l complianc e requirement s E . Reviewnotificatio n o fInitia l performanc e test s an d revie wtes t pla n F . Reviewnotificatio n o fcomplianc e statu s G . Record s fo rare a source s no t subjec t t o th e standar d H . Reviewo

fNESHA P waive rapplicatio n 7 . Reportin g requirement s A . Reviewsemiannua l complianc e report 1 ) Semiannua l complianc e report s wit h n o exceedance s 2 ) Semiannua l complianc e report s wit h exceedance s B . Additiona l report s fo rsource s wit h add-o n control device s 1 ) Reviewofcontro l devic e performanc e tes t report an d operatin g rang e 2 ) Reviewstartup , shutdown , malfunctio n report s 208 0 1 5 2 2 4 n/ a 2 2 8

1 2 2 2 2 n/ a n/ a 2 0 2 n/ a n/ a

1 6 4 208 0 1 5 2 2 4

1 6 4 1

1 0 1 7

13. 6 3. 4 208 0

15 0 3 4 2 4

27. 2 13. 6 1 6 4 10 4

7. 5 1. 7

1.3 6 0.6 8 0. 8 0. 2 20 8

1 5 3. 4

2 2 8 1

1 3. 4 2

2 27. 2 0. 1

0.1 1.3 6 0. 2

0. 2 2.7 2 $9 2

$9 2 $1,24 9

2.7 2 1.3 6 1. 6 0. 4 $ 0 12 2 2 2
2 0 2 17

17 1 7 17
1 17 20 4

3 4 3 4 3 4
2 0 3 4 10. 2

1. 7 1. 7 1. 7
1 1. 7 20. 4

3. 4 3. 4 3. 4
2 3. 4 $9,36 8

$1,56 1 $1,56 1 $1,56 1 $91 8 $1,56 1

$1,24 9 $62 5 $73 5 $18 4 Q. h

g. i

TOTA L BURDE N AN D COS T(SALARY ) TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 2,74 0 13 7 $125,82 6

FOOTNOTE S a Base d o n 1 7 ne wfacilitie s beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r1
. b Cost s ar e base d o n th e followin g hourl yrate s (th e cost s ar e loade d rates) : Technica l $40.32 , Managemen t$66.56 , an d clerica l $22.74

. cOn e tim e onl ycosts
. Numbe ro l occurrence s i s 4 5 state s tha t hav e RP C majo rsource s an d 1 0 regio n offices
. d Applie s t o th e 1 7 ne wfacilitie s beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r1
. e Applie s t o th e on e ne wfacilityassume d t o hav e a n add-o n contro l device
. fAssume s 2 0 percen t o fth e 1 7 facilitie s wil l hav e a n exceedance
. g Assume s tha t on e semi-annua l repor t wi n b e require d th e firs t yea rofoperation
. h Assume s 8 0 percen t o fth e 1 7 facilitie s wil l hav e n o exceedances
.

3- 1TABL E 6 . AGENC Y REPORTIN GAN D RECORDKEEPIN G BURDE NFO R YEAR 2
Burde n Ite m EP Ahour s pe r"^ 8 ° LEP Ahours pe r occurrenc e """^ s pe rfacilit y Occurrence s Technica l hour s Managemen t Clerica l hours (A ) (B ) ( C = AXB ) 5 (D )

" O - 0 3 4 ( E = C xD )

5 ( F = Ex0.05 ) ( G = Ex0.1 ) Cost s b (H ) Footnote s

1
. Litigatio n 2
. Rea d an d understan d rul e requirement s 3
. Ente ran d updateinformatio n int o agencyrecordkeepin g syste m 4
. Require d activitie s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s A
. Observ e initia l add-o n contro l devic e performanc e tes t B
. Observ e repeat performanc e tes t C
. Revie woperatin g parameters D
. Revie wcontinuou s paramete rmonitorin g 5
. Exceedanc e Enforcemen t Activitie s an d Inspection s 6
. Notificatio n requirement s A
. Revie winitia l notificatio n tha t existin g source s ar e subject t o th e standar d B
. Notification s fo rne wmajo rsource s 1 ) Revie wnotificatio n o finten t t o construc t a ne wmajo rsourc e an d revie wapplicatio n t o construc t 2 ) Revie wnotificatio n ot star t o fconstructio n 3 ) Revie wnotificatio n o fanticipate d startu p dat e 4 ) Revie wnotificatio n o factua l startu p dat e C Revie wreques t fo rcomplianc e extentio n D
. Revie wnotificatio n o fspecia l complianc e requirement s E
. Revie wnotificatio n ofinitia l performanc e test s an d revie wtes t pla n - F
. Revie wnotificatio n ot complianc e statu s G
. Record s lo rare a source s not subject t o th e standar d H
. Revie wo

fNESHA P waive rapplicatio n 7
. Reportin g requirement s A
. Revie wsemiannua l complianc e repor t 1 ) Semiannua l complianc e report s wit h n o exceedance s 2 ) Semiannua l complianc e report s wit h exceedance s B
. Additiona l report s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s 1 ) Revie wofcontro l devic e performanc e tes t repor t an d operatin g rang e 2 ) Revie wstartup , shutdown , malfunctio n report s 266 0 0 4 2 4 n/ a 2 2 8

1 2 2 2 2 n/ a n/ a 2 0 2 n/ a n/ a

1 6 4 1 6 4 20. 4

5. 1 0

13 6

81. 6 40. 8 3 2 0

6. 8

4.0 8 2.0 4 1. 6 0. 4 0

13. 6 4. 8

8.1 6 4.0 8 3. 2 0. 8 $ 0

$6,24 5 $2,20 4 2 2 8 2

2 6. 8 4

4 54. 4 0. 2

0. 2 2.7 2 0. 4

0. 4 -5.4 4 $18 4

$18 4 $2,49 8 $ 0 1 2 2 2 2
2 0 2 1 7

1 7 1 7 1 7
2 1 7 20 4

3 4 3 4 3 4
4 0 3 4 10. 2

1. 7 1. 7 1. 7
2 1. 7 20. 4

3. 4 3. 4 3. 4
4 3. 4 $9,36 8

$1,56 1 $1,56 1 $1,56 1 $1,83 7 $1,56 1

$3,74 7 $1,87 4 $1,47 0 $36 7 TOTA LBURDE N AN D COS T(SALARY ) TOTA LANNUA LHOUR S 78 9 3 9 $36,22 3

FOOTNOTE S a Base d i n 1 7 ne wfacilitie s beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r2 an d th e 1 7 facilitie s tha t bega n operatio n i n Yea r1
. b Cost s ar e base d o n th e followin g hourl yrate s (th e cost s ar e loade d rates) : Technica l $40.32 , Managemen t$66.56 , an d clerica l $22.74

. cBase d o n 2 o

fth e 1 7 ne wfacilitie s havin g a n add-o n contro l device
. d Assume s tha t 2 0 percen t o fth e 3 4 facilitie s wil l hav e a n exceedance
. e Base d o n th e 1 7 facilitie s tha t begi n operatio n i n Yea r2 submittin g on e semiannua l report , th e 1 7 facilitie s tha tbega n operatio n i n Yea r1 submittin g tw o semiannua l reports , an d 8 0 percen t o fthes e report s indicat e n o exceedances
. fBase d o n th e 1 7 facilitie s that begi n operatio n i n Yea r2 submittin g on e semiannua l report , th e 1 7 facilitie s tha tbega n operatio n i n Yea r1 submittin g tw o semiannua l reports , an d 2 0 percen t o fthes e report s indicat e a n exceedance
.

3- 2TABL E 7 . AGENC Y REPORTINGAN D RECORDKEEPIN G BURDE NFO R YEA R 3
Numbe ro

f occurrence s pe rfacilit y (B ) Burde n Ite m EP Ahour s pe r occurrenc e <*2 EP Ahour s pe rOccurrence s facilit ya ( C = AXB ) 

### J2
_ Technica l hours ( E = C xD ) Managemen t

( F = E x0.05 ) Clerica l hour s

( G = E x0.1 ) Cost s b (H ) Footnote s
1 . Litigatio n 2 . Rea d an d understan d rul e requirement s 3 . Ente ran d updatelnformatio n int o agenc yrecordkeepin g syste m 4 . Require d activitie s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s A . Observ e Initia l add-o n contro l devic e performanc e tes t B . Observ e repea t performanc e tes t C . Reviewoperatin g parameter s D . Reviewcontinuou s paramete rmonitorin g 5 . Exceedanc e Enforcemen t Activitie s an d Inspection s 6 . Notificatio n requirement s A . Reviewinitia l notificatio n tha t existin g source s ar e subjec t t o th e standar d B . Notification s fo rnewmajo rsource s 1 ) Reviewnotificatio n o finten t t o construc t a newmajo rsourc e an d revie wapplicatio n t o cons t 2 ) Reviewnotificatio n ofstart ofconstructio n 3 ) Reviewnotificatio n ofanticipate d startu p dat e 4 ) Reviewnotificatio n o factua l startu p dat e C . Reviewreques t fo rcomplianc e extentio n D . Reviewnotificatio n o fspecia l complianc e requirement s E . Reviewnotificatio n o fInitia l performanc e test s an d reviewtes t pla n F . Reviewnotificatio n ofcomplianc e statu s G . Record s fo rare a source s no t subjec t t o th e standar d H . Reviewo

fNESHA P waive rapplicatio n 7 . Reportin g requirement s A . Reviewsemiannua l complianc e report 1 ) Semiannua l complianc e report s wit h n o exceedance s 2 ) Semiannua l complianc e report s wit h exceedance s B . Additiona l report s fo rsource s wit h add-o n contro l device s 1 ) Reviewo

fcontro l devic e performanc e tes t report an d operatin g rang e 2 ) Reviewstartup , shutdown , malfunctio n report s TOTA L BURDEN

ANDCOS T (SALARY ) TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 1 5 2 2 4 n/ a 2 2 8 1 0 48 6 1 7 3 4 3 4 97. 2 0

0 97 2 40 8 6 8 6 8 777. 6 0

48. 6 20. 4 3. 4 3. 4 38.8 8 0

97. 2 40. 8 6. 8 6. 8 77.7 6 $ 0

$ 0 $44,63 6 $18,73 6 $3,12 3 $3,12 3 $35,70 9 $ 0 1 2 2 2 2 n/ a n/ a 1 6 2 n/ a n/ a
2 4 1 2 4 1

1 1 1
1 1

2 4 1 1 1 2

2 2 2
1 6 2

4 1 6 1 2 4 1 9

1 9 1 9 1 9
3 4 45 2

20 8 5 2 3 4 3 4 22 8

3 8 3 8 3 8
54 4 90 4
# 83 2 83 2 40 8 13 6 6,29 2 11. 4

1. 9 1. 9 1. 9
27. 2 45. 2

41. 6 41. 6 20. 4 6. 8 31 5 22. 8

3. 8 3. 8 3. 8
54. 4 90. 4

83. 2 83. 2 40. 8 13. 6 62 9 $10,47 0

$1,74 5 $1,74 5 $1,74 5 $24,98 2 $41,51 3

$38,20 7 $38,20 7 $18,73 6 $6,24 5 $288,92 3 d

g

h i d

FOOTNOTE S a Base d o n 1 9 ne wfacilitie s beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r3 an d 43 3 existin g source s complyin g i n Yea r3 plu s th e 1 7 lacilitie s tha tbega n operatio n i n Yea r1 an d th e 1 7 facilitie s tha t bega n operatio n i n Yea r2
. b Cost s ar e base d o n th e followin g hourl yrate s (th e cost s ar e loade d rates) : Technica l $40.32 , Managemen t$66.56 , an d clerica l $22.74

. cBase d o n 2 o

fth e 1 9 ne wfacilitie s an d 3 2 ofth e 43 3 existin g facilitie s havin g a n add-o n contro l device
. d Assume s fiftypercen t o fth e performanc e test s ar e observe d b yAgencypersonne l e Assume s 2 0 percen t o fth e 48 6 facilitie s wil l hav e a n exceedance
. fApplie s t o th e 1 9 ne wfacilitie s beginnin g operatio n i n Yea r3
. g Base d o n th e 1 9 facilitie s tha t begi n operatio n i n Yea r3 an d th e 43 3 existin g source s submittin g on e semiannua l report , th e 3 4 facilitie s tha tbega n operatio n i n Yea r1 an d Yea r2 submittin g tw o semiannua l reports , an d 8 0 percen t o fthes e report s indicat e n o exceedance s h Base d o n th e 1 9 facilitie s tha t begi n operatio n i n Yea r3 an d th e 43 3 existin g source s submittin g on e semiannua l report , th e 3 4 facilitie s tha tbega n operatio n i n Yea r1 an d Yea r2 submittin g tw o semiannua l reports , an d 2 0 percen t o fthes e report s indicat e a n exceedance
.

c o o o

## TABL E 8 . SUMMAR Y AN D AVERAG E O F AGENC Y REPORTIN G AN D RECORDKEEPIN

G BURDE NFO R YEAR S 1 THROUG H 3 . Agenc yBurde n Summary

Year l Yea r2 Yea r3 Technica l Hour s 2,74 0 78 9 6,29 2 Managemen t Hour s 13 7 3 9 31 5 Clerica l Hour s

27 4 7 9 62 9 Averag e Burde n Tota l Hour s 3,15 1 90 7 7,23 5 11,29 3 Tota l Cost s

$125,82 6 $36,22 3 $288,92 3 $450,97 2



### 3-4