IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No. 3: l 8crl 12 

JIMMY L. WEBB, JR., JUDGE WALTER H. RICE 

Defendant. 

DECISION AND ENTRY FINDING DEFENDANT IN VIOLATION OF 

PROBATION, REVOKING SAME AND IMPOSING SENTENCE, WITH 

THREE YEAR PERIOD OF SUPERVISED RELEASE TO FOLLOW; 

CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE SET FORTH; DEFENDANT 

ORALLY EXPLAINED HIS RIGHT OF APPEAL AND HE ORALLY 

INDICATED AN UNDERSTANDING OF SAME; NEITHER COUNSEL FOR 

THE GOVERNMENT NOR FOR THE DEFENDANT HAD ANY 

PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE OBJECTIONS TO THIS COURT'S 

DISPOSITION; TERMINATION ENTRY 

On March 16, 2021, the Defendant, having previously been found in violation of his 

probation, a status that began on January 3, 2019, appeared in a video conference, having waived 

a personal appearance in court. At that time, he admitted to violation number eight, the only 

allegation in the Fifth Amended Petition directing him to show cause why his probation should 

not be revoked. As was the situation with regard to the other seven allegations, this Court 

accepted the admission and, once again, found him in violation of his probation. 

On March 18, 2021, the Defendant appeared, by video conferencing for final disposition, 

again having waived a personal appearance in court. Pursuant to the record made on the 

aforesaid, March 18, 2021 , this Court revoked the Defendant's probation and remanded him to 

Case: 3:18-cr-00112-WHR Doc #: 77 Filed: 07/28/21 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 210
the custody of the Attorney General of the United States, the Bureau of Prisons, for a period of 

time served, being from February 28, 2021 , through March 18, 2021. Said sentence of time 

served is to be served concurrently with the state sentence and is to be followed by a three-year 

period of Supervised Release, upon the following conditions: 

1. Defendant is to discharge all previously undischarged conditions of Probation, 

including, but not limited to drug treatment, job training and mental health counseling; 

2. Defendant is to serve the first four months of Supervised Release on home 

detention, the first two of those months to be served with a curfew and the last two months with 

no curfew (providing Defendant's conduct warrants such a lessened restriction); 

3. Defendant is to establish contact with the Montgomery County Office of 

Ex-Offender Reentry, within 72 hours ofrelease, to enroll in the Reentry Career Alliance 

Academy; and, 

4. Defendant is to be screened for Reentry Court. The conditions regarding Reentry 

Court and the Reentry Career Alliance Academy are not to interfere with any employment 

secured by Defendant. 

This Court requests Probation Officer, Eric Dem, to construct a program giving 

Defendant the maximum exposure to mental health treatment, which is not to be terminated 

without the written opinion of the mental health provider that Defendant no longer requires such 

treatment. 

As to recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons, the Court recommends that Defendant 

receive the maximum amount of drug treatment and mental health counseling available. He is to 

be exposed to programming in critical thinking skills, cognitive behavioral therapy, moral 

reconation and/or thinking for a change. 

2 

Case: 3:18-cr-00112-WHR Doc #: 77 Filed: 07/28/21 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 211
By way of explanation as to the sentence of time served, the Court states that the 

approximately six months that Defendant spent in custody, prior to this latest violation, is 

punishment sufficient but no more than needed to carry out the purposes of sentencing, with 

regard to violations one through seven. Moreover, in this Court's opinion, the state has 

adequately punished Defendant for violation number eight. 

On March 23, 2021, the Defendant was ordered returned to state custody to finish serving 

the sentence imposed by the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County. 

Following the above, the Defendant was orally explained his right of appeal and he orally 

indicated an understanding of same. Neither counsel for the government nor for the Defendant 

had any procedural or substantive objections to this Court's disposition. 

The captioned cause is ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States 

District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. 

July 27, 2021 

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record 

Eric Dem, USPO 

WALTER H. RICE 

UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT JUDGE 

3 

Case: 3:18-cr-00112-WHR Doc #: 77 Filed: 07/28/21 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 212