1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN GARRETT, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:18-cv-00692

Judge Michael H. Watson

Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. 

Deavers

________________________________________ )

JOHN DOES 151-166, )

) Case No. 2:20-cv-03817

Plaintiffs, )

) Judge Michael H. Watson

v. )

) Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. 

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, ) Deavers

)

Defendant. )

________________________________________ )

)

JOHN DOES 172-191 AND JANE DOE 1, ) Case No. 2:21-cv-02121

)

Plaintiffs, ) Judge Michael H. Watson

)

v. ) Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P.

) Deavers

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, )

)

Defendant. )

________________________________________ )

)

JOHN DOES 192-217, )

) Case No. 2:21-cv-02527

Plaintiffs, )

) Judge Michael H. Watson

v. )

) Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P.

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, ) Deavers

)

Defendant. )

________________________________________ )

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 213 Filed: 08/16/23 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1612
2

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE

In response to the Court’s August 7, 2023, Opinion and Order, Wright & Schulte, LLC 

supplements its response with the following:

1. Plaintiffs’ Position On Claims Revived. 

a. Wright & Schulte Cases – John Does 151-166, Case No. 2:20-cv 03817; 

John Does 172-191 and Jane Doe 1, Case No. 2:21-cv-02121; John Does 

192-217, Case No. 2:21-cv-02527: 

Violation of Title IX, 20 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq.

2. Plaintiffs’ Position On Title IX Theories They Are Pursuing.

a. Wright & Schulte Cases – John Does 151-166, Case No. 2:20-cv 03817; 

John Does 172-191 and Jane Doe 1, Case No. 2:21-cv-02121; John Does 

192-217, Case No. 2:21-cv-02527:

Wright & Schulte Plaintiffs are pursuing pre-assault heightened risk Title IX claims against 

Defendant. Plaintiffs are not pursuing post-assault Title IX violations. However, Plaintiffs are 

concerned that the Court, through its Order, is requiring Plaintiffs to forego certain claims without 

the benefit of discovery and without motion practice. Plaintiffs believe that the complaints and the 

claims plead within should speak for themselves until there has been discovery and motion 

practice. 

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Richard W. Schulte

Richard W. Schulte (0066031)

WRIGHT & SCHULTE, LLC

865 S. Dixie Dr.

Vandalia, OH 45377

(937) 435-7500

(937) 435-7511 facsimile

rschulte@yourlegalhelp.com

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 213 Filed: 08/16/23 Page: 2 of 4 PAGEID #: 1613
3

Counsel for the Wright & Schulte, LLC Plaintiffs 

(John Does 151-166, Case No. 2:20-cv-03817; John 

Does 172-191 and Jane Doe 1, Case No. 2:21-cv02121; and John Does 192-217, Case No. 2:21-cv02527)

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 213 Filed: 08/16/23 Page: 3 of 4 PAGEID #: 1614
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically on August 16, 2023. Notice 

was sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system to all other counsel who have entered 

an appearance and any parties who have entered an appearance through counsel. The parties may 

access this filing through the Court’s ECF system. 

/s/ Richard W. Schulte

Richard W. Schulte

Counsel for the Wright & Schulte, LLC Plaintiffs 

(John Does 151-166, Case No. 2:20-cv-03817; John 

Does 172-191 and Jane Doe 1, Case No. 2:21-cv02121; and John Does 192-217, Case No. 2:21-cv02527)

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 213 Filed: 08/16/23 Page: 4 of 4 PAGEID #: 1615