alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-933]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Navinta LLC, has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before April 1, 2022. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before April 1, 2022.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on October 18, 2021, Navinta LLC, 1499 Lower Ferry Road, Ewing, New Jersey 08618-1414, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled
                             substance
Drug
                             code
Schedule4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (ANPP)
8333
IILevomethorphan
9210
IILevorphanol
9220
IINoroxymorphone
9739
IIFentanyl
9801
II
 The company plans to bulk manufacture active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) quantities of the listed controlled subsances for validation purpose and the Food and Drug Adminstration approval. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. Brian S. Besser, Acting Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2022-01815 Filed 1-28-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

GATED PROPERTIES VIII, LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LEWIS TREE SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cv-132

Judge Timothy S. Black

CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court being advised that the parties have reached an agreement to settle this 

civil action;

It is ORDERED that all claims in this action are hereby DISMISSED with 

prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 45 days, 

move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties 

may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement 

agreement.

The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement 

agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 6/7/2019 Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
56/36 Infantry 

Division

72/36 Infantry 

Division

155th Armored

39th Infantry

256th Infantry

278th Cavalry

48th Infantry

218th Armored

27th Infantry

86th Infantry

92nd Infantry

29th Infantry

207th Infantry

*Shoulder patch under development

50th Infantry

*Shoulder patch under development

53rd Infantry

National Guard 

JFHQs

National Guard 

JFHQs

Alaska

Hawaii Puerto Rico

Guam

Virgin Islands

40th Infantry

1/34 Infantry 

Division

2/34 Infantry 

Division

32nd Infantry

76th Infantry

33rd Infantry

149th Infantry

National Guard Divisions

81st Armored

116th Cavalry

41st Infantry

37th Infantry

116th Infantry

45th Infantry

Alabama Alaska

Arizona Arkansas

California Colorado

Connecticut Delaware

District of Columbia Florida

Georgia Guam

Hawaii Idaho

Illinois Indiana

Iowa Kansas

Kentucky Louisiana

Maine Maryland

Massachusetts Michigan

Minnesota Mississippi

Missouri

Montana Nebraska

Nevada New Hampshire

New Jersey New Mexico

New York North Carolina

North Dakota Ohio

Oklahoma Oregon

30th Armored

58th Infantry

26th Infantry

2/28th Infantry Div

55/28th Infantry Div

56/28th Infantry Div

28th ID

Pennsylvania

29th ID

Virginia

34th ID

Minnesota

35th ID

Kansas

36th ID

Texas

38th ID

Indiana

40th ID

California

42nd ID

New York

Pennsylvania Puerto Rico

Rhode Island South Carolina

South Dakota Tennessee

Texas Utah

Vermont Virgin Islands

Virginia Washington

West Virginia Wisconsin

Wyoming

The U.S. Army National Guard

Divisions, BCTs and Joint Force Headquarters
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      725
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                        760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,481
<PP&E>                                           6,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,858
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              687
<BONDS>                                          8,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,022
<OTHER-SE>                                          21
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,445
<SALES>                                          8,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,654
<CGS>                                            5,895
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (9)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    800
<INCOME-TAX>                                       296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                504
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       504
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents,   in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations   of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ PAUL G. GABOS        
| | --- | -------------------------
| |     |                          
| |     | Paul G.   Gabos          
| |     | Chief   Financial Officer

May 7, 2004

26
Terry Joe Wayne SMITH v. Krystal Johnson SMITH

2160355

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Isaac Warren SHAW, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2556

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99
                             Selected Information
                              Relating to Series 
                    1994-1 Certificates, Series 1995-1
                       Certificates, Series 1996-1
                Certificates, Series 1996-2 Certificates, and
                       Series 1997-1 Certificates from 
                  January 1, 1998 through September 30, 1998
                 --------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

 

                Series 1994-1    Series 1995-1     Series 1996-1   Series 1996-2    Series 1997-1    
                Floating Rate    6.50% Auto        5.50% Auto      Floating Rate    Floating Rate      
                Loan Asset       Loan Asset        Loan Asset      Loan Asset       Loan Asset
                Backed           Backed            Backed          Backed           Backed
                Certificates     Certificates      Certificates    Certificates     Certificates
                ------------     -------------     -------------   ------------     ------------



<S>             <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>


Interest
Paid            $44,395,063.05   $  50,258,680.60 $ 33,087,500.03  $ 42,781,201.06   $ 32,841,297.31  

Servicing  
Fee Paid        $ 7,499,999.97   $   7,499,999.97 $  6,000,000.03  $  7,200,000.00   $  5,625,000.00  


 
                    
                





</TABLE>

                                             -14-
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 54 

Making an emergency supplemental appropriation for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2021, to provide funding to Israel for the Iron Dome 

defense system to counter short-range rocket threats. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2021 

Mr. MCCARTHY (for himself, Mr. SCALISE, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. ROGERS of 

Alabama, and Mr. MCCAUL) submitted the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition 

to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making an emergency supplemental appropriation for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2021, to provide funding to Israel for the Iron Dome defense system to 

counter short-range rocket threats. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following sum is appropriated, out of any money 

4 in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal 

5 year ending September 30, 2021, and for other purposes, 

6 namely: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 54 IH 

1 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

2 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE

4 For an additional amount, $1,000,000,000, to remain 

5 available until September 30, 2023, which shall be for the 

6 Secretary of Defense to provide to the Government of 

7 Israel for the acquisition, enhancement, maintenance, and 

8 sustainment of the Iron Dome defense system to counter 

9 short-range rocket threats: Provided, That nothing under 

10 this heading may be construed to apply to previously ap11 propriated funds for the procurement of Iron Dome: Pro12 vided further, That such amount is designated by the Con13 gress as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 

14 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 

15 Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)(A)(i)). 

16 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Sup17 plemental Appropriations Resolution, 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 77 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2022 

Mr. ARRINGTON (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, and Mr. ELLZEY) submitted the 

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution 

of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 77 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total expenditures for a year shall not 

3 exceed the average annual revenue collected in the three 

4 prior years, adjusted in proportion to changes in popu5 lation and inflation. Total expenditures shall include all 

6 expenditures of the United States except those for pay7 ment of debt, and revenue shall include all revenue of the 

8 United States except that derived from borrowing. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress may by a roll call vote of two10 thirds of each House declare an emergency and provide 

11 by law for specific expenditures in excess of the limit in 

12 section 1. The declaration shall specify reasons for the 

13 emergency designation and may authorize expenditures in 

14 excess of the limit in section 1 for up to one year. 

15 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have power to enforce 

16 this article by appropriate legislation. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 4. This article shall take effect in the first 

18 year beginning at least 90 days following ratification, ex19 cept that expenditures may exceed the limit in section 1 

20 by the following portion of the prior year’s expenditures 

21 exceeding that limit (excepting emergency expenditures 

22 provided for by section 2): nine-tenths in the first year, 

23 eight-ninths in the second, seven-eighths in the third, six24 sevenths in the fourth, five-sixths in the fifth, four-fifths 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 77 IH 

1 in the sixth, three-fourths in the seventh, two-thirds in the 

2 eighth, and one-half in the ninth.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register: July 13, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 133)]
[Notices]               
[Page 39921-39922]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13jy10-59]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0102]

 
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency; DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
August 12, 2010, unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by dock number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
of make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the Chief Privacy and FOIA Officer, Headquarters Defense Logistics 
Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, 
VA 22060-6221.
    The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of records 
notice in its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 
1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within 
the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered 
system report.

    Dated: July 8, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion:
S600.40.

System name:
    Readiness and Accountability Records (November 16, 2004; 69 FR 
67112).

Reason for deletion:
    Records formerly maintained under S600.40 are now being maintained 
under a DoD-wide Privacy Act system of records notice identified as DPR 
39 DoD, entitled ``DoD Personnel Accountability and Assessment System''

[[Page 39922]]

published in the Federal Register on March 24, 2010, at 75 FR 14141.

[FR Doc. 2010-17013 Filed 7-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 19 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal 

the twenty-third article of amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. RICE of 

South Carolina, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. FALLON, and Mr. BAIRD) submitted the 

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to repeal the twenty-third article of amendment 

to the Constitution of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 19 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The twenty-third article of amendment 

5 to the Constitution of the United States is hereby re6 pealed. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to en8 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7562

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus GREGORY ROLAND PRUESS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-99-48; CA-01-149-5) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 4, 2005 Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Roland Pruess, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nick Williams, Jennifer Marie Hoefling, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gregory Roland Pruess, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), as a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); seeReid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 368-69, 374 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court also are debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pruess has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Pruess’ notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. SeeUnited States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 496 (2003). In order- 3 - to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on colla teral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b) (2000); 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ¶ 8. Pruess’ claims do not satisfy either of these conditions. Therefore, we decline authorization to Pruess to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan B. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust at the end of, and for the period covered by the Report.



/s/ Alan B. MillerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 12, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and
will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.