alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,090
<OTHER-SE>                                    (80,590)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (78,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.004)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Amin I. Khalifa, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ AMIN I. KHALIFA

 Amin I. Khalifa
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the Securities and Exhange Commission
or its staff upon request.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Superconductor Corporation (the Company) for the period
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David A. Henry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 7, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    DAVID A.
HENRY
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | David A. Henry         
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 43 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2021 

Mr. GREEN of Tennessee submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require that the Supreme Court of the United 

States be composed of nine justices. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 43 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Supreme Court of the United 

3 States shall be composed of nine justices, though one or 

4 more of these nine offices may be vacant until filled. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. If the size of the Supreme Court has 

6 been increased to more than nine justices before this 

7 amendment is ratified, upon the ratification of this 

8 amendment, those additional offices are void. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have the power to en10 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carmike Cinemas, Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



|                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD B. HARE                                                                                     
|Richard B. Hare the Senior Vice PresidentFinance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation
|                                                                                                           
|March 16, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,568,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,835,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,126
<INVENTORY>                                  4,239,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,550,179
<PP&E>                                       5,157,298
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,374,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,783,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,058,140
<BONDS>                                        333,333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,535,221
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,837
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,620,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,783,200
<SALES>                                     10,155,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,387,037
<CGS>                                        7,543,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,210,877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,903,496)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,227,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,227,080)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.75)


</TABLE>
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Curtis Billy Bonilla Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40315 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FRANCISCO MONTEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-343-1

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Francisco Montez appeals his sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. Montez argues that the evidence is insufficient to support sentence enhancements imposed for obstruction of justice and for his role in the offense. Montez’s arguments are not reviewable on appeal because he waived both issues at sentencing. United States v. Musquiz , 45 F.3d 927, 931 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Fw: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg , and scheduling next mtg

Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 05/03/2010 11:00 AM

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/03/2010 11:00 AM -----

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/03/2010 10:45 AM

Subject: RE: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg

Thanks for your message, Lydia,

1) Thu meeting is in response to your suggestion that we brief the interagency 

group on policy decisions this week (not modeling)

2) The reviewer asked for key comments only, so what you suggest (the main 

group of public health commenters, UARG, API, ACC and all the state comments) 

would be perfect, thank you. We appreciate EPA sending these to help 

reviewers move more quickly, rather than asking reviewers to fish through 

regulations.gov.

I hope you had a good weekend,

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:41 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Morrison.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov; Stewart.Michael@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Re: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next 

mtg

Heidi,

I just left you a VM with a question about Thursday's meeting. Mike and I 

also have a question about which comments you would like to have. We have 

about 80-100 substantive comments. We can send you the main group of public 

health commenters, UARG, API, ACC and all the state comments.

Does this sound sufficient, or would you like to see all of them?

Thanks.

Lydia

 

 From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 
 

 To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Margaret 

Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Date: 04/30/2010 03:23 PM 

 Subject: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling 

next mtg 

Hello Lydia and Margaret,

Reviewers have asked EPA to share key comments described in the briefing

today, including those from Health and Environmental Groups, Industry

Groups, State and local governments cited in the presentation.

Also – is EPA available the morning of Thursday, 5/6, for a teleconference on 

EPA’s final rule?

Thanks,

heidi
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 16


<PAGE>   2


November 22, 1996


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

We have read the statements made by MSU Corporation (copy attached), which we
understand will be filed with the Commission, pursuant to Item 9 of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1995. We agree
with the statements concerning our Firm in such Form 10-K.

Very truly yours,

/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PowerSecure International, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  May 5, 2011
    /s/ Sidney HintonSidney HintonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carmike Cinemas, Inc. (the
Corporation) for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, the Senior Vice President - Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Corporation, certifies that: (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation. /s/ Martin A. DurantMartin A. DurantSenior Vice President - Finance,Treasurer and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2004
#### Goodwin vs. Anderson et al.

A judgment by attachment, boforo a justice of the peace, without personal servico of process upon the defendant, or appearance, is a judgment *in rein;*and cannot be transferred to the office of the clerk of the Circuit Court, for tho purpose of constituting a lien upon the realty of the debtor, or of being satisfied by execution or garnishment, out of property or effects, other than the goods attached.

*Appeal from the Cvrcuit Court of Union County.*

The Hon. ThoMAS Hubbard, Circuit Judge.

Watson, for the appellant.

Mr. Chief Justice English

delivered the opinion of the Court.

It appears from the transcript in this case, -that Anderson & Coulter brought suit, by attachment, before a justice of the peace *37of TJnion county, upon an account against one Gosney, and the constable returned tbe writ of attachment not found, as to Gos-ney, but levied upon a trnnk, three pair of pants, a coat, inkstand, American Form-book, and the life of John Nandolph, as the goods and chattels of the absent debtor. That after posting up notices, as prescribed by law, judgment was finally rendered by the justice against Gosney, on default of appearance, for §30 J5, and for costs. That execution was issued upon the judgment, and returned with a credit of §5 endorsed. That Anderson & Coulter afterwards filed a transcript in the office of the clerk of the Circuit Court of Union county, and caused to be issued thereon a writ of garnishment against Goodwin, returnable into said court. At the return term, allegations and interrogatories were filed by the plaintiffs, against Goodwin, which he answered, stating that he had previously executed his note to Gosney for §1100, but whether he was still the owner and holder of the note, or had transferred it to some other person, respondent was not informed, and did not know; he, therefore, denied that he was indebted to Gosney, except as above stated. Upon this answer, the court rendered judgment against him for the amount due upon the judgment of the justice against Gosney, with costs, &c., to which he excepted, and appealed to this court.

There being no personal service of process upon Gosney, and no appearance by him, in the attachment suit, the proceedings and judgment were *in*rem, and of no vitality, except for the condemnation and sale of the property attached. The judgment could not be transferred to the clerk’s office for the purpose of constituting a lien upon the realty of the debtor, or of being satisfied by execution or garnishment, out of property or effects other than the goods attached. *Boothe vs. Estes,*16 *Ark.*

The judgment of the Circuit Court must be set aside, and the cause remanded, with instructions to dismiss it for want of jurisdiction.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1. Such quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: August 15, 2005.

By: /s/ James A. Joyce
    -----------------------
    James A. Joyce
    Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
United States District Court

Southern District ofOhio

Related Case Memorandum

Civil Cases

TO: Judge Watson, Magistrate Judge Deavers, Magistrate Judge Vascura

FROM: Eric Weitz , Deputy Clerk

DATE: 10/21/2019

SUBJECT: Case Caption: Does 88-94 v. The Ohio State University

CASE: Case Number: 2:19-cv-4624

Judges: Judge Watson / Magistrate Judge Vascura

File Date: 10/18/2019

This memorandumis to notify you that following cases are possibly related:

Related Case

Case Caption: Garrett et al v. The Ohio State University

CaseNumber: 2:18-cv-692 District Judge: Watson

FileDate: 7/16/2018 Magistrate Judge: Deavers

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 125 Filed: 11/25/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 689
Memo Re; Related Civil Cases

Page 2

The District Judges having conferred. We respond to Case Administrator Eric Weitz

as follows:

Judges' Response:

• We agree that the cases are not related and that the subject case should remain

with the Judge to whom it is assigned.

• We agree that the cases arerelated anjjl ji^a/th^'^ject case should be

transferred to the docket ofJudge

• We agree that although the cases are related, the subject case nevertheless

should remain with the Judge to whom it was assigned.

• We are unable to agree and will accept any decision made by the ChiefJudge.

• I am the Judge on both/all ofthe listed cases and have determined that the cases

related.

• I am the Judge on both/all ofthe listed cases and have determined that the cases,

and they shall both/all remain on my docket.

• Other DirectionofJudge:

UhitedStates District Judge

United States District Judge

United States District Judge

Cc: Courtroom Deputies

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 125 Filed: 11/25/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 690