alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
David DELLY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0875

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the Company) grants you this stock option pursuant to its
2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (the Plan).
 This Agreement incorporates the terms of the Plan and in the case of any conflict between the
Plan and this Agreement, the terms of the Plan will control.
 1. Option. The Company grants you a nonstatutory stock option (the Option) to
purchase from the Company XX shares of common stock of the Company (Company Stock), at $ X.XX per
share. This option price is the fair market value of Company Stock on [date] (the Grant Date).
The grant of the Option is subject to the following terms and conditions:
  Number of Shares That May Be ExercisedDate
    

(Vested
Portion of Option)




---



##### 



Payment For Option
 Transferability
         Adjustments
 Exercise and Notices




---



##### 



Withholding
 Continuation of Employee of the Company
 Delivery of Certificate
 STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.By:Its:
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Ron Howell certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2013;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: April 4, 2014By:\s\ Ron HowellRon HowellChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7530

KEVIN L. CHOICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

E. M. DAVIS, Lieutenant; MEDICAL STAFF, of

Kershaw Correctional Institution; RICKIE

HARRISON, Warden; LIEUTENANT BROGTON, NFN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-99-3705-0-18BD)

Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin L. Choice, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, Rock Hill,

South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin L. Choice appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Choice v. Davis, No. CA-99-3705-0-18BD (D.S.C. filed Oct. 3, 2000;

entered Oct. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Docket Number FAA-2014-0231

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Gordanko Jeremic

(613) 952-4357

07/23/13 No Objections

Bombardier

Aerospace

Mher Krikorian

(613) 855-5001 x56298

07/23/13 No Objections

RAA Scott Foose

(202) 367-1212

08/13/13 No Objections
Christopher G. WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2825

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Order entered April 18, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01461-CR

No. 05-13-01462-CR

KENNETH AVERY FARR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-55168-V, F13-57650-V

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s records in these 

appeals within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Anto nio, Texas

February 27, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00096

- CV

IN RE Carolina GARZA

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

On February 22, 2017, Relator Carolina Garza filed a petition for writ of mandamus with

this Court. Relator has not fil ed a certified or sworn copy of the order of which she complains in

her petition. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.3(k)(1)(A). Relator is ordered to supplement the mandamus

record with a certified or sworn copy of the order being challenged by her petition for wri t of

mandamus within ten days of this of this order.

It is so ORDERED on February 27, 2017

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

________________________________

Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14

- 05

- 53192

- CV , styled Carolina Garza v. UV Logistics, LLC and Alex

Rodriguez , pending in the 79th Judicial District Court

, Jim Wells County, Texas, the Honorable Richard C. Terrell

presiding.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1. Such quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: February 13, 2007

By: /s/ James A. Joyce
    -----------------------
    James A. Joyce
    Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
     2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
     covered by this Report and the results of operations of the Company for the
     period covered by this Report.

           A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Corvas International, Inc. and will be retained by Corvas
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



Date: May 7, 2003                      By: /s/ RANDALL E. WOODS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Randall E. Woods
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: May 7, 2003                      By: /s/ CAROLYN M. FELZER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Carolyn M. Felzer
                                           Vice President and Controller
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

PHILIP CHARVAT, on behalf of himself 

and others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE SOUTHARD CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:18-CV-190-MHW 

JUDGE MICHAEL H. WATSON 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHELSEY M. 

VASCURA 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF AMENDED CASE SCHEDULE 

 For good cause shown, Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of the Amended 

Case Schedule is GRANTED. The case schedule set forth in the Court’s Order Granting 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Deadlines entered on June 17, 2020 (Doc. No. 78) is hereby amended 

as follows: 

 PREVIOUSLY 

SET FOR: 

EXTENDED TO: 

Rebuttal Expert Report Deadline: July 17, 2020 August 17, 2020 

Discovery Deadline: August 3, 2020 September 3, 2020 

Motion to Certify Class: September 4, 2020 October 5, 2020 

Defendants’ Memorandum in Opposition to 

Motion to Certify Class: October 16, 2020 November 16, 2020 

 The deadline for filing dispositive motions, set for 60 days after the Court’s ruling on 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify, remains unchanged. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

_/s/ Chelsey M. Vascura __________ 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              State/Country of
Name                                           Incorporation       % Ownership
- ------------------------------------------    ----------------   ---------------
<S>                                           <C>                <C>

Flanders/CSC Corporation                      North Carolina        100.00%

Air Seal Filter Housings, Inc.                Texas                 100.00%

Precisionaire, Inc.                           Florida               100.00%

Flanders International Pte, Ltd.              Singapore             100.00%

Flanders Filters, Inc.                        North Carolina         98.86%

Airseal West, Inc.                            Utah                  100.00%

Flanders Airia Technologies, Inc.             North Carolina        100.00%

GFI, Inc.                                     Utah                  100.00%

S.R.I., Inc.                                  Utah                  100.00%

Flanders/Precisionaire Corp.                  North Carolina        100.00%

Flanders Realty Corp.                         North Carolina        100.00%

Flanders Airpure Products Company, LLC        North Carolina        100.00%(1)

Flanders Airia Technologies International     England               100.00%(2)
  Ltd.

Flanders Airpure Filter Sales and             North Carolina        100.00%
  Service, Inc.

Sierra Ridge Filter Corporation               California            100.00%

Eco-Air Products, Inc.                        California            100.00%

Industrias Seco de Tijuana, C.C.S.A. de C.V.  Mexico                100.00%(3)
</TABLE>

_____________________

(1) 63% owned by Flanders Filters, Inc., 37% by the Company.
(2) Owned by Flanders Airia Technologies, Inc.
(3) Owned by Eco-Air Products, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

DENISE JACKSON CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00450-MRB

Plaintiff Judge Michael R. Barrett

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

v.

WAL-MART, INC., et al •

FEDERAL CIVIL RULE 41 

Defendants DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41, Plaintiff, Denise Jackson, hereby

enters this stipulation of dismissal with prejudice signed by all the parties who have appeared.

Costs to the Plaintiff.

1

J mes A. Whitaker (#0000992)

226 Reading Road

Mason, Ohio 45040

Phone: (513) 398-1910

Facsimile: (513) 398-0181

jim@whitakerattorneys.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Ha ley e er (#0 p 9 2)

255 E. Fift Stree Suite 1900

Cincinnati, Ohio 5202

Phone: (513) 977-8200

Facsimile: (513) 977-8141

haley.geiler@dinsmore.com

Attorney for Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 20, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system and sent notification of such filing to the

following: James A. Whittaker, 226 Reading Road, Mason, Ohio 45040;

j im@whitakerattorneys.com.

/s/ Hayley L. Geiler
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997, AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND THE NOTES THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          41,008
<SECURITIES>                                   145,186
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,961
<PP&E>                                          44,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 535,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,017
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       531,377
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,659)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   535,536
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,523
<CGS>                                           15,946
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,573
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,069
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,069
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/ JOHN P. BYRNESJohn P. Byrnes Chief Executive Officer


November 6, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations found on
pages F-3 through F-6 of the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          45,365
<SECURITIES>                                    33,645
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,556,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,849,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,761,075
<PP&E>                                     114,682,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             179,557,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,187,331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  8,765,250
<COMMON>                                         1,215 
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,922,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               179,557,647
<SALES>                                      9,825,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           134,011,369
<CGS>                                        5,773,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              117,887,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (7,948,091)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,426,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,228,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      372,000
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,569,811
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Eastern Division

WILLIAM SCHMITT, JR., CHAD THOMPSON,

AND DEBBIE BLEWITT,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 2:18-cv-966

CRAIG M. STEPHENS, PATRICIA NELSON, 

DORIA DANIELS, AND ELAYNE J. CROSS, 

in their official capacities as members of the

Portage County Board of Elections,

Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiffs, WILLIAM SCHMITT, JR., CHAD THOMPSON, AND DEBBIE BLEWITT, 

appeal the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

denying an award of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) to Plaintiffs, see Opinion and 

Order, R.79; Judgment in a Civil Action, R.80, entered the 21st day of September, 2020, and in 

favor of Defendants, CRAIG M. STEPHENS, PATRICIA NELSON, DORIA DANIELS, AND 

ELAYNE J. CROSS, in their official capacities as members of the Portage County Board of 

Elections, said final order, see Opinion and Order, R.79, also refusing to alter and/or amend the

Court's prior non-final order, see Order, R. 71, denying an award of attorney's fees to Plaintiffs 

without mentioning the liability of Defendants, CRAIG M. STEPHENS, PATRICIA NELSON, 

DORIA DANIELS, AND ELAYNE J. CROSS, in their official capacities as members of the

Portage County Board of Elections, for Plaintiffs' attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b).

Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81 Filed: 09/26/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 644
2

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Mark R. Brown

Mark R. Brown

Mark G. Kafantaris 303 East Broad Street

625 City Park Avenue Columbus, OH 43215

Columbus, OH 43206 (614) 236-6590

(614) 223-1444 (614) 236-6956 (fax)

(614) 300-5123 (fax) mbrown@law.capital.edu

mark@kafantaris.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81 Filed: 09/26/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 645