alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!" !#$%

&'	'()(* )

+,-./0,1,2234.,560789:;<=;>?@>A./B0

CDEFGHIJKLMNOPNJFPNQOPRS

TUHJFGHIJKLMNOPNJFPPQVWRS

XYZ[\]^_`a_bYcdZeZfgdhiiYjklh^\a]\mnZoZfk^

p\obZk]f\[c^jmcZ[[Zoohidnfhakof\b`kmZkdYh\f

]ZnhfZYZikmchmZdcZd`ZcYZoZnZdokdc_dqZ`Za]Zfr

XYZ[\]^_`a_bYcdZeZfgdhiiYjklh^\a]\mnZoZfk^p\obZk]f\[c^jmcZ[[Zo

ohidnfhakof\b`kmZkdYh\f]ZnhfZYZikmchmZdcZd`ZcYZoZnZdokdc_d

qZ`Za]Zfr

srtrq_mcf_`cu\obZv_`YkZ^wrxkcmhdYkoYkdo^ZocYZ`kmZhnyZkfzkmct_oZ

[Ykfak`_mcwkfh^oz\bZdZ{^Zc`YZfm_d`Z{^Zc`YZfikm`YkfbZo_dtZ[cZa]Zf

|}~}r

\chdqZ`r|~kmkcchfdZjmcYZoZnZdokdckdoe_`c_ambkcYZfZonhf{^Zc`YZfm

mZdcZd`_dbYZkf_dbxkcmhdmZdcihfocYkcYZYkofZ`\mZoY_amZ^nnfhacYZ

`kmZr

wZo_odhcb_eZkfZkmhdkdoih\^odhcfZc\fd`k^^mnfhar{^Zc`YZfm

kcchfdZjfkokf]_dih\^odhc`haaZdchdxkcmhdmoZ`_m_hdr

u\obZzoa\dortkfb\mufrkoa_d_mcfkc_eZp\obZnhfcYZlh^\a]\mhnn_`Zhnsrtr

q_mcf_`clh\fcmk_o_cm]Zmcnhfkp\obZchfZ`\mZY_amZ^n_ncYZfZmZeZdcYZ

k[[Zkfkd`Zhn_a[fh[f_Zcjk]h\cY_mk]_^_cjch]Znk_fr

x_cYh\f`h\fc_cmdhck[fh]^Za]Z`k\mZcYZfZkfZhcYZfp\obZmiYh`kdckgZ

heZfcYZ`kmZYZmk_or`kddZeZfbhifhdb_nfZ`\mZr`kd[hmm_]^jbhifhdb

_nohdcfZ`\mZr

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 193-5 Filed: 09/15/21 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 1439
 	

			 !" !#$%

&'	'()(* )

+,-,./012-3,4/.,,56,78,-89.,724,8:,;4,0<,4=.9;7/4,4>=8:,?:/<,/

79@=0>789=>@8,.,48AB:/8;>3:8C,C,7/24,8:,?9.8:,>.=/;>0>,4D@9E9.:/<,/

79@@,78>9@E>8:8:,6/.8>,4>@<90<,-9.:/<,/@?=>@/@7>/0>@8,.,48>@8:,6/.8>,4

>@<90<,-A

FAGAH>48.>78I2-3,J03,@9@KAL/.C0,?E920-@986/.8>7>6/8,>@7/4,48:/8

>@<90<,-M:>9G8/8,F@><,.4>8?N=9.,5/;60,NC,7/24,:,>49@8:,2@><,.4>8?O4

C9/.-9=8.248,,4AG/.3244/>-:,N899NE920-.,724,:>;4,0==.9;MGF7/4,4

C,7/24,:,8,/7:,4/88:,2@><,.4>8?O40/E47:990A

I2-3,4/.,@98.,P2>.,-89,560/>@E:?8:,?.,724,8:,;4,0<,4C28242/00?-9N

G/.3244/>-A

+0,87:,.NQRN@9E>447:,-20,-89C,4,@8,@7,-C?L/.C0,?/8STU/A;AL9@-/?>@

=,-,./0792.8A

B:,-,=,@-/@860,/-,-32>08?/?,/./39899@,792@89=2@0/E=200?->48.>C28>@3

8:,6/>@D>00,.95?79-9@,N9@,792@89==>0>@3=/04,>@79;,V8/5.,82.@4/@-9@,

792@89=48.2782.>@3NE:>7:>4C.,/D>@3/0/.3,7/4:-,694>8>@894,<,./04;/00,.

9@,489,</-,FAGAB.,/42.?H,6/.8;,@8.,69.8>@3.20,4A

W,9E@,-X/48L/>@G8.,,8Y:/.;/7?NSRRZXAL/>@G8AN/@-=>00,-6.,47.>68>9@4

8:,.,=9.6/8>,@849=H.AY/20KA[90D;/@N/\:>7/39-9789.E:996,./8,-6/>@V

6>0070>@>74>@Y9.84;928:/@-\:>00>798:,A

J=,-,./012.?>@\>@7>@@/8>=92@-[90D;/@32>08?>@L/?9=S]792@849=

>00,3/00?->48.>C28>@36/>@D>00,.4A+92.9=8:94,792@84>@<90<,--,/8:4AW,>4

47:,-20,-89C,4,@8,@7,-9@L/.7:SQA

+0,87:,.7920-:/<,C,,@4,@8,@7,-89/409@3/4RR?,/.4>@6.>49@9@8:,8:.,,

7:/.3,4NC28/60,//3.,,;,@8:,@,398>/8,-E>8:6.94,7289.47/004=9./6.>49@

4,@8,@7,9=S^;9@8:4898E9?,/.4A_8/0497/004=9.6.9:>C>8>@3:>;=.9;

E9.D>@3/4/6:/.;/7>48/@-.,P2>.>@3:>;896/?C/7D8/5,4A

B:,7/4,E/4>@<,48>3/8,-C?8:,FAGAH.23X@=9.7,;,@8J-;>@>48./8>9@>@

\902;C24/@-8:,_`GA

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 193-5 Filed: 09/15/21 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 1440
 	

			 !" !#$%

&'	'()(* ))

+,-./01-234/.562.789:2.;,<-8.512.,.;;-3=.493/>92-/95-?67@.?1:.2AB

C/181:BC/181:D3/E2F1/--9:.121G67@.1477.5;94.7-8.512.H.5162.8.92

36-3,-3D494-8.D94-./B

I8.512.-8.4,.;;-3J1/H;.KB

E@/1KL792F1-58B53:

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 193-5 Filed: 09/15/21 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 1441
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, J r.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 13, 2011

d0112 

# Order

January 13, 2011

141439

- 40(137)(138)(139)

PATRICK McCARTHY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 141439

- 40

COA: 293482; 293483

Oakland CC: 2008

- 089426

- NO;

EDWARD SOSNICK, WENDY L. POTTS, 2008

- 094425

- NO

KEVIN M. OEFFNER, RICHARD M. LYNCH,

JEA NNE STEMPIEN, KATHLEEN J.

McCANN, THOMAS J. RYAN, BARRY M.

GRANT, MICHAEL J. TALBOT, DIANE M.

GARRISON, NANCY J. DIEHL, RONALD F.

ROSE, NANCY J. GRANT, GOVERNOR OF

MICHIGAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

and JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION,

De fendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 9,

2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneous ly. The motions for an evidentiary hearing and for sanctions are

DENIED.

M ARY B ETH K ELLY

, J., not participating.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0620 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STEVEN JAMES CLIFTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 23, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 15 2022

11/15/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0620
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

JOHN L. GLAZE,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:18-cv-720

v. CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,

Defendant.
ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of a Report and Recommendation issued
by the Magistrate Judge on July 12,2019. (ECF No. 15.) The time for filing objections has passed,
and no objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court
ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. For the reasons set forth in the Report and
Recommendation, the Court OVERRULES the Plaintiff's Statement of Errors and AFFIRMS the
Commissioner of Social Security’s decision. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment
accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

71-30 -S01N
DATE EDM . SARGUS, JR.
CHIEF €NITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of United Retail Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending August 2, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission) on the date hereof (the Report), we, Raphael Benaroya,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and George R. Remeta, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that based on our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                            | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/RAPHAEL BENAROYARaphael BenaroyaChief Executive OfficerSeptember 4, 2003 | 
|                                                                            | 
|/s/GEORGE R. REMETAGeorge R. RemetaChief Financial OfficerSeptember 4, 2003 |
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in SAN Holdings, Inc. Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (SEC File No. 333-81910) of our report dated March 19, 2001, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of SAN Holdings, Inc. as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2000 which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, for
the year ended December 31, 2001.

Denver, Colorado
March 20, 2002
             
             
             
             
             
             
             
CAUSEY DEMGEN & MOORE INC.
Order entered July 2, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 00141

- CV

AMBER ETTA BUMPUS, Appellant

V.

BRENT WADE FITZGERALD

, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No . 773788



### O RDER

The Court has before it appellant’s June 20, 2013 motion to accelerate this appeal

. The

Court DENIES the motion.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS

JUSTICE
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District June 25, 2013 

Appendix F: EPA’s Approval of the Fresno-First Air Monitoring Site Relocation F-1 

Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan 

APPENDIX F: 

EPA’s Approval of the Fresno-First Air 

 Monitoring Site Relocation 
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District June 25, 2013 

Appendix F: EPA’s Approval of the Fresno-First Air Monitoring Site Relocation F-2 

Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan 

This page intentionally blank
Myron Lorenzo TOBLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 13, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Leon Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


s/ Leon Moore
-----------------------------------
Leon Moore
Chief Executive Officer
August 25, 2003


<PAGE>

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 13, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bob Marlowe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


s/  Bob Marlowe
-----------------------------------
Bob Marlowe
Chief Financial Officer
August 25, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FY1998 Q3
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          46,704
<SECURITIES>                                    30,052
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,073
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,186
<PP&E>                                          38,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,379
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,608
<SALES>                                         38,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,570
<CGS>                                           18,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,982
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (910)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                       725
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
Amendment No.1 to Service Agreement between Spectrum Global Fund Administration



 Exhibit 10.21 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”),
dated as of January 1, 2009, to the Services Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) dated as of May 23, 2007, by and between SPECTRUM GLOBAL FUND ADMINISTRATION, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
(“Company”), on the one hand, and DIVERSIFIED FUTURES TRUST I, a Delaware statutory trust (the “Client”), on the other hand. 
 W I T N E S S E T H : 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Client entered into the Original
Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Client desire to amend the Original Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment to the Original Agreement. The Company agrees that it shall not increase the Administrative Services Fee described in Section 3.1 of the Original Agreement and on Exhibit B to the
Original Agreement at any time prior to December 31, 2009. 
 2. Remainder of Original Agreement. Except as provided in Section 1
hereof, the Original Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect, and each reference to the Original Agreement and words of similar import in the Agreement, as amended hereby, shall be a reference to the Original Agreement as amended
hereby and as the same may be further amended, supplemented and otherwise modified and in effect from time to time. 
 3. Miscellaneous.

 (a) Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Original
Agreement. 
 (b) Entire Agreement. This Amendment No. 1 constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties hereto
with respect to its subject matter and supercedes all oral communication and prior writings (except as otherwise provided herein) with respect thereto. 
 (c) Amendments. No amendment, modification or waiver in respect of this Amendment No. 1 will be effective unless in writing (including a writing evidenced by facsimile transmission) and executed by each of
the parties hereto. 







 (d) Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed and delivered in counterparts
(including by facsimile), each of which will be deemed an original. 
 (e) Headings. The headings used in this Amendment No. 1
are for convenience of reference only and are not to affect the constructions of or be taken into consideration in interpreting this Amendment No. 1. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the day and year first written above. 
  

					
	CLIENT:
	
	DIVERSIFIED FUTURES TRUST I
		
	By:	 	 Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.,
 it’s Managing Owner

		
	By:	 	/s/ Esther E. Goodman
		 	Name:	 	Esther E. Goodman
		 	Title:	 	Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	
	COMPANY:
	
	SPECTRUM GLOBAL FUND ADMINISTRATION, L.L.C.
		
	By:	 	Carol A. Burke
		 	Name:	 	Carol A. Burke
		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer

  

 2
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



NationsBank, N.A. (d/b/a/ Bank of America, N.A.) as Trustee
 for the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust:

We are aware Cross Timbers Oil Company and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust have
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-56983 on Form S-3,
and that Cross Timbers Oil Company has incorporated by reference in its Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-55784 on Form S-8
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999,
which includes our report dated May 10, 1999, covering the unaudited interim
financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the
Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration
statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by
our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas
May 14, 1999
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91-2 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91-2 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91-2 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91-2 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91-2 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91-2 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91-2 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91-2 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91-2 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 9 of 9
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4886-4887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02058]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m., Thursday, February 10, 2022.

PLACE: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the public may only virtually 
attend this meeting. If you would like to virtually attend, at least 24 
hours in advance, visit FCA.gov, select ``Newsroom,'' and then select 
``Events.''

[[Page 4887]]

From there, access the linked ``Instructions for board meeting 
visitors.''

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

<bullet> Approval of January 13, 2022 Minutes
<bullet> Report on the Young, Beginning, and Small Farmers and Ranchers 
Forum
<bullet> Report on Farm Input Prices
<bullet> Conservators and Receivers Proposed Rule

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: If you need more information, need 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley 
Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-
4056.

Ashley Waldron,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-02058 Filed 1-27-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Slip Op. 06-174

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

____________________________________

:

ACTION GLOVE COMPANY, INC., :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : Before: MUSGRAVE, Judge

: Court No. 04-00002

UNITED STATES, : (with attached schedule)

:

Defendant. :

____________________________________:

JUDGMENT

The above-captioned actions were stayed pending this Court’s resolution of Cricket Hosiery,

Inc. v. United States, Court Number 03-00533. On April 24 of this year, the Court issued a final

judgment dismissing that action. SeeCricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States, 30 CIT __, 429 F. Supp.

2d 1338 (2006). On September 28, the Court ordered that each of the above-captioned plaintiffs

“shall, within 30 days of the date of this Order, show cause why its action should not be dismissed

for lack of prosecution.” To date, no plaintiff has come forward with any reason why these actions

should not be dismissed. Therefore, pursuant to United States Court of International Trade Rule

41(b)(3), it is hereby

ORDERED that these actions are dismissed for lack of prosecution.

 /s/ R. Kenton Musgrave 

 R. Kenton Musgrave, Judge

Dated: November 29, 2006

New York, New York
Court No. 04-00002 Page 2

Also identified as Exportia International Incorporated. 1

SCHEDULE

Court Number Plaintiff

03-00707 Fila U.S.A. Inc.

03-00739 Eastern Pacific Apparel, Inc.

03-00740 Vans, Inc.

03-00768 Firoze Fakhri

03-00769 Farbe, Inc.

03-00779 Capital Mercury Apparel, Ltd.

03-00802 G-Star Apparel, Inc.

03-00815 Franco Apparel Group, Inc.

03-00857 Esportia International, Inc.1

03-00873 Seattle Pacific Industries, Inc.

03-00877 Sears, Roebuck & Company

03-00892 Louisville Bedding Company

03-00929 Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products Companies, Inc.

03-00930 Impact Imports International, Inc.

04-00141 Sumitomo Corporation of America
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60138 

Conference Calendar

__________________

TAREK ELAGAMY,

 Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND 

 NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

 Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

A-26 440 666

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tarek Elagamy petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of his motion requesting that

he be allowed to reopen his case in order to move for a

suspension of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(2). To

succeed in a motion to reopen, the alien must establish prima

facie eligibility for the relief sought. See I.N.S. v. Doherty,

502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992). Even if the alien has made out a prima
No. 95-60138

-2-

facie case for relief, the BIA has the discretion to deny a

motion to reopen. Id. This court reviews the BIA's denial of a

motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Id.

Elagamy contends that had the BIA granted his motion to

reopen, he would have established that his deportation should

have been suspended pursuant to § 1254(a)(2). Section 1254(a)(2)

states that the Attorney General may suspend deportation in the

case of an alien who, among other requirements, "has been

physically present in the United States for a continuous period

of not less than ten years immediately following the commission

of an act . . . constituting a ground for deportation . . . ." 

Elagamy argues that he "committed" his deportation-worthy

violation in 1983, when he lied to immigration officials about

whether he resided with his wife, rather than in 1986 when he was

convicted of the offense. In Brown v. I.N.S, however, this court

dismissed the petitioner's request for suspension of deportation

pursuant to § 1254(a)(2) because he had not been in the United

States for ten years since the date of his conviction of a

deportation-worthy crime. 856 F.2d 728, 731 (5th Cir. 1988). 

"[I]t is the firm rule of this circuit that one panel may not

overrule the decisions of another." United States v. Taylor, 933

F.2d 307, 313 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 883 (1991). 

Accordingly, Elagamy's petition for review is without arguable

merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because this petition is frivolous, it

is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.