5430 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD results from testing that showed 

that the wing splice assembly could fail 

before the assembly reaches its established 

life limit. The FAA is issuing this AD to 

prevent failure of the wing splice assembly 

before the current established life limit. The 

unsafe condition, if not addressed, could 

result in loss of airplane control. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Action 

Within 90 days after the effective date of 

this AD, revise the Airworthiness Limitations 

section in the existing maintenance manual 

or instructions for continued airworthiness 

by reducing the life limit of the wing splice 

assembly part number 46W57A100–001 to 

3,767 hours time-in-service. 

Note 1 to paragraph (g): Section 4–00–00 

of Piper Aircraft, Inc., PA–46–600TP, M600 

Maintenance Manual, Airworthiness 

Limitations, Page 1, dated August 31, 2021, 

contains the life limit in paragraph (g) of this 

AD. 

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO Branch, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 

14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your 

principal inspector or local Flight Standards 

District Office, as appropriate. If sending 

information directly to the manager of the 

certification office, send it to the attention of 

the person identified in paragraph (i)(1) of 

this AD. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(i) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact John Marshall, Aviation Safety 

Engineer, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, 1701 

Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; 

phone: (404) 474–5524; email: 

john.r.marshall@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Piper Aircraft, Inc., 2926 

Piper Drive, Vero Beach, FL 32960; phone: 

(772) 299–2141; website: https://

www.piper.com. You may view this 

referenced service information at the FAA, 

Airworthiness Products Section, Operational 

Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 

64106. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110. 

Issued on January 26, 2022. 

Lance T. Gant, 

Director, Compliance & Airworthiness 

Division, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01955 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 100 

[Docket Number USCG–2021–0774] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Special Local Regulation; Montlake 

Cut, Union Bay Reach, Seattle, 

Washington 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing 

to establish a special local regulation for 

a recurring marine event on Lake 

Washington the first Satruday of May 

each year. This action is necessary to 

provide for the safety of life on the 

navigable waters during the marine 

event. This proposed rulemaking would 

restrict vessel traffic in the designated 

area during the event unless authorized 

by the Captain of the Port Sector Puget 

Sound or a designated representative. 

We invite your comments on this 

proposed rulemaking. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before March 3, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2021–0774 using the Federal Decision 

Making Portal at https://

www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public 

Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for 

further instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions about this proposed 

rulemaking, call or email Chief Warrant 

Officer William Martinez, Sector Puget 

Sound Waterways Management 

Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 

206–217–6051, email 

SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COTP Captain of the Port Sector Puget 

Sound 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal 

Basis 

The Coast Guard proposes to establish 

a special local regulation for the 

Windermere Cup marine event held 

annually on the first Saturday of May 

each year from 8 a.m. to noon. This 

event is held on the navigable waters of 

the Montlake Cut and Union Bay Reach 

between Portage Bay and Webster Point 

on Lake Washington in Seattle, WA. 

Under 46 U.S.C. 70041, Coast Guard 

Thirteenth District Commander has 

authority to promulgate certain special 

local regulations deemed necessary to 

ensure the safety of life on the navigable 

waters immediately before, during, and 

immediately after an approved marine 

event. The District Commander has 

determined that potential hazards 

associated with the marine event would 

pose a safety concern for anyone within 

the race area. 

In order to protect the safety of all 

waterway users, including event 

participants and spectators, this 

proposed rule would establish a special 

local regulation for the time and 

location of the marine event. Participant 

means all persons and vessels registered 

with the event sponsor as a participants 

in the race. Spectator means any vessel 

in the vicinity of the marine event with 

the primary purpose of witnessing the 

marine event. Spectator vessels can 

observe the marine event from one of 

the designated spectator areas. One area 

is located north of Union Bay Reach in 

Union Bay. The other is located in the 

area between the state route 520 bridge 

and south of Union Bay Reach. Vessels 

would not be permitted to enter the 

regulated areas unless authorized by the 

COTP or a designated representative. 

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes to add a 

new annually recurring special local 

regulation on the first Saturday of May 

each year from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. The 

regulated area would cover the all 

navigable waters from Montlake Cut and 

Union Bay Reach between Portage Bay 

and Webster Point on Lake Washington 

in Seattle, from the southern corner of 

University of Washington Oceanography 

pier at 47°38′57′′ N, 122°18′45′′ W 

thence south to 47°38′46′′ N, 122°18′45′′ 

W, thence eastward to Webster Point 

Light 21 at 47°38′51′′ N, 122°16′33′′ W, 

thence south to the SR520 bridge at 

47°38′37′′ N, 122°16′34′′ W. These 

coodinates are based on Nort American 

Datum 83 (NAD 83). 

The duration of the regulated area is 

intended to ensure the safety of the 

public and participants during the 

rowing race. Non-participant vessels are 

not permitted to enter, transit through, 

anchor in, or remain within the 

regulated area without obtaining 

permission from the COTP or a 

designated representative. A designated 

representative means a Coast Guard 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Proposed Rules 5431 

Patrol Commander, including a Coast 

Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other 

officer operating a Coast Guard vessel 

and a Federal, State, and local officer 

designated by or assisting the Captain of 

the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the 

enforcement of the regulations in this 

section. To seek permission to enter, 

contact the COTP or the COTP’s 

representative by calling the Sector 

Puget Sound Command Center at 206– 

217–6002. Those in the regulated area 

must comply with all lawful orders or 

directions given to them by the COTP or 

the designated representative. The Coast 

Guard will provide notice of the 

regulated area by Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, announcement in the Local 

Notice to Mariners and on-scene 

designated representatives. The 

regulatory text we are proposing appears 

at the end of this document. 

IV. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes and 

Executive orders, and we discuss First 

Amendment rights of protestors. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

This NPRM has not been designated a 

‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under 

Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, 

the NPRM has not been reviewed by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). 

This regulatory action determination 

is based on the size, location, and 

duration of the special local regulation. 

Vessel traffic would be able to safely 

transit around this special local 

regulation area which would impact a 

small-designated area of the Montlake 

Cut and Union Bay Reach. Moreover, 

the Coast Guard would issue a 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF– 

FM marine channel 16 about the areas, 

and the proposed rule would allow 

vessels to seek permission to enter the 

areas. 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 

1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires Federal agencies to consider 

the potential impact of regulations on 

small entities during rulemaking. The 

term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this proposed rule would not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

While some owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the safety 

zone may be small entities, for the 

reasons stated in section IV.A above, 

this proposed rule would not have a 

significant economic impact on any 

vessel owner or operator. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this proposed rule would economically 

affect it. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule. If the 

proposed rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast 

Guard will not retaliate against small 

entities that question or complain about 

this proposed rule or any policy or 

action of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would not call for 

a new collection of information under 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132 

(Federalism), if it has a substantial 

direct effect on the States, on the 

relationship between the National 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175 (Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments) because it would not 

have a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

If you believe this proposed rule has 

implications for federalism or Indian 

tribes, please call or email the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

potential effects of this proposed rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, 

associated implementing instructions, 

and Environmental Planning 

COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which 

guide the Coast Guard in complying 

with the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves regulated area lasting 4 

hours that would prohibit persons or 

vessels from transiting the regulated 

area during the rowing event. Normally 

such actions are categorically excluded 

from further review under paragraph 

L61 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 

Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, 

Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of 

Environmental Consideration 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket. For instructions 

on locating the docket, see the 

ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We 

seek any comments or information that 

may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPS1
5432 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Proposed Rules 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places, or vessels. 

V. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We view public participation as 

essential to effective rulemaking, and 

will consider all comments and material 

received during the comment period. 

Your comment can help shape the 

outcome of this rulemaking. If you 

submit a comment, please include the 

docket number for this rulemaking, 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. 

Submitting comments. We encourage 

you to submit comments through the 

Federal Decision Making Portal at 

https://www.regulations.gov. To do so, 

go to https://www.regulations.gov, type 

USCG- 2021–0774 in the search box and 

click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this 

document in the Search Results column, 

and click on it. Then click on the 

Comment option. If you cannot submit 

your material by using https://

www.regulations.gov, call or email the 

person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this proposed rule 

for alternate instructions. 

Viewing material in docket. To view 

documents mentioned in this proposed 

rule as being available in the docket, 

find the docket as described in the 

previous paragraph, and then select 

‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the 

Document Type column. Public 

comments will also be placed in our 

online docket and can be viewed by 

following instructions on the https://

www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked 

Questions web page. We review all 

comments received, but we will only 

post comments that address the topic of 

the proposed rule. We may choose not 

to post off-topic, inappropriate, or 

duplicate comments that we receive. 

Personal information. We accept 

anonymous comments. Comments we 

post to https://www.regulations.gov will 

include any personal information you 

have provided. For more about privacy 

and submissions to the docket in 

response to this document, see DHS’s 

eRulemaking System of Records notice 

(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing 

to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 

NAVIGABLE WATERS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05– 

1. 

■ 2. Add § 100.1311 to read as follows: 

§ 100.1311 Special Local Regulation; 

Montlake Cut, Lake Washington, Seattle, 

Washington. 

(a) Regulated area. The regulations in 

this section apply to the following area: 

The navigable waters from Montlake Cut 

and Union Bay Reach between Portage 

Bay and Webster Point on Lake 

Washington in Seattle, from the 

southern corner of University of 

Washington Oceanography pier at 

47°38′57′′ N, 122°18′45′′ W thence south 

to 47°38′46′′ N, 122°18′45′′W, thence 

eastward to Webster Point Light 21 at 

47°38′51′′ N, 122°16′33′′ W, thence south 

to the SR520 bridge at 47°38′37′′ N, 

122°16′34′′ W. These coodinates are 

based on Nort American Datum 83 

(NAD 83). 

(b) Definitions. As used in this 

section— 

Designated representative means a 

Coast Guard Patrol Commander, 

including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty 

officer, or other officer operating a Coast 

Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and 

local officer designated by or assisting 

the Captain of the Port Sector Puget 

Sound (COTP) in the enforcement of the 

regulations in this section. 

Participant means all persons and 

vessels registered with the event 

sponsor as a participants in the race. 

Spectator means any vessel in the 

vicinity of a marine event with the 

primary purpose of witnessing the 

event. Spectator vessels can observe the 

marine event from one of the designated 

spectator areas. One area is located 

north of Union Bay Reach in Union Bay. 

The other is located in the area between 

the state route 520 bridge and south of 

Union Bay Reach. 

(c) Regulations. (1) All nonparticipants are prohibited from 

entering, transiting through, anchoring 

in, or remaining within the regulated 

area described in paragraph (a) of this 

section unless authorized by the COTP 

or their designated representative. 

(2) To seek permission to enter, 

contact the COTP or the COTP’s 

representative by calling the Sector 

Puget Sound Command Center at 206– 

217–6002. Those in the regulated area 

must comply with all lawful orders or 

directions given to them by the COTP or 

the designated representative. 

(3) The COTP will provide notice of 

the regulated area through advanced 

notice via broadcast notice to mariners, 

announcement in the local notice to 

mariners, and by on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced annually from 8 a.m. to 

12 a.m. on first Saturday of May. 

Dated: October 26, 2021. 

M.W. Bouboulis, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

Thirteenth Coast Guard District. 

Editorial note: This document was 

received for publication by the Office of the 

Federal Register on January 27, 2022. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01999 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Chapter III 

[Docket ID ED–2021–OSERS–0160] 

Proposed Priority—State Personnel 

Development Grants 

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services, Department of 

Education. 

ACTION: Proposed priority. 

SUMMARY: The Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services 

(OSERS) proposes a funding priority 

under the State Personnel Development 

Grants (SPDG) program, which assists 

States in reforming and improving their 

systems for personnel preparation and 

personnel development in order to 

improve results for children with 

disabilities. We take this action to focus 

attention on the need to improve results 

for children with disabilities and their 

families by supporting a comprehensive 

system of personnel development 

(CSPD) for the Individuals with 

Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C 

Grants for Infants and Families program. 

The Department may use the proposed 

priority for competitions in fiscal year 

(FY) 2022 and later years. 

DATES: We must receive your comments 

on or before March 3, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments 

through the Federal eRulemaking Portal 

or via postal mail, commercial delivery, 

or hand delivery. We will not accept 

comments by fax or by email or those 

submitted after the comment period. 

Please submit your comments only one 

time, in order to ensure that we do not 

receive duplicate copies. In addition, 

please include the Docket ID at the top 

of your comments. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

www.regulations.gov to submit your 

comments electronically. Information 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPS1