alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following are the Company's subsidiaries as of April 7, 2003. All beneficial
interests are wholly-owned by the Company and are included in the Company's
consolidated financial statements.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     Name of Subsidiary                      State of Organization          Date of Incorporation
                     ------------------                      ---------------------          ---------------------
<S>                                                          <C>                            <C>
                      MA Brands, Inc.                              Delaware                        9-16-97
                        Mador, S.A.                           Dominican Republic                   10-29-99
              Mount Vernon Distributors, Inc.                      New York                        10-15-93
        Michael Anthony Jewelers Manufacturing, LLC                New York                        7-25-02
         Michael Anthony Jewelers Real Estate, Inc.                New York                        07-09-02
     Michael Anthony Jewelers Sales & Distribution, LLC            New York                        07-09-02
</TABLE>
Charles JENKINS, DOC #248761, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 nos. 33-15777, 33-33966, 33-61286, 33-90490, 333-01885, 333-07519, 333-69597, 333-69599, 333-92879, 333-51892, 333-51894 and 333-106601) pertaining to various stock plans of Manatron, Inc. of our report dated June 25, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Manatron, Inc. and subsidiary included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2004.

Grand Rapids, Michigan
July 21, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Scott D. Dalesandro, )

et al., )

) 

Plaintiffs, ) Case No. C-1-01-109

)

vs. )

)

International Paper )

Company, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

This matter came before the Court on October 28, 2003

for a phone conference on the issue whether amended notice should

be sent to the class regarding payment of unused vacation time as

part of severance benefits due. During the conference, the Court

established the following deadlines:

Defendant to serve discovery requests on Plaintiffs by

October 29, 2003.

Defendant to serve discovery requests on Smart Paper by

October 31, 2003.

Plaintiffs to respond to Defendant’s discovery requests

by November 12, 2003.

Parties will submit blind briefs on this issue by

December 12, 2003.

Parties will submit responsive briefs by December 19,

2003.

No reply briefs will be filed.

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 55 Filed 10/28/2003 Page 1 of 2
2

IT IS SO ORDERED

Date October 28, 2003 /s Sandra S. Beckwith 

 Sandra S. Beckwith 

 United States District Judge

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 55 Filed 10/28/2003 Page 2 of 2
1

Subject: Re: question re: in press EHP paper

Attachments: analysis-pgm1-AP-LF-interaction methylation9909 Main 2014_02_12 - for EPA.xlsx; analysispgm1-AP-LF-interaction methylation9909 interactions 2013_04_30 - for EPA.xlsx

From: Lepeule, Johanna [mailto:jlepeule@hsph.harvard.edu]  

Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 2:52 AM

To: Patel, Molini

Subject: Re: question re: in press EHP paper

Dear Molini, 

Please find attached the requested estimates. I hope everything is clear. If not, do not hesitate to ask for further 

information. 

Thanks for the consideration of our work, 

Best regards, 

Johanna 

Le 23 juin 2014 à 22:02, Patel, Molini <Patel.Molini@epa.gov> a écrit : 

Dear Johanna,

Our office is currently developing the Integrated Science Assessment of Oxides of Nitrogen and

reviewing your “in press” paper in EHP, “Epigenetic Influences on Associations between Air Pollutants 

and Lung Function in Elderly Men: The Normative Aging Study.”

  

We are interested in the results you report in several figures and hope you would share with us the

quantitative results (effect estimates and 95% CI).  Specifically, we are interested in the NO2 results

from Figure 1 and Figure S2.  For Figure S2, we appreciate quantitative results for some of the genes

evaluated, for example, IL‐6 mean, iNOs mean, and TLR‐2 position 5.

  

Thank you for your consideration!

Molini

  

  

Molini M. Patel, PhD, MPH

Epidemiologist

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

National Center for Environmental Assessment

Mailcode: B243‐01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: 919.541.1492, Fax: 919.541.1818, Email: patel.molini@epa.gov
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; NIGMS Review of SuRE First 
Applications.
    Date: March 22, 2022.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 45 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Tracy Koretsky, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, 
MSC 6200, Room 3AN.12F, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301 594 2886, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#55212734362c7b3e3a273021263e2c153b3c3d7b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="47333526243e692c28352233342c3e07292e2f69202831">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, 
Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.859, 
Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-01741 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

605 CA 11-02161 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF LOLA BANKS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A GUARDIAN OF THE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PERSONAL NEEDS AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT OF CHARLIE B.H., AN ALLEGED INCAPACITATED PERSON, RESPONDENT.

JOY A. KENDRICK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

PHILIP A. MILCH, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered May 27, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied petitioner’s request for additional counsel fees for Joy A. Kendrick, Esq.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the second ordering paragraph is vacated and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81, petitioner, the property guardian of a now-deceased incapacitated person, appeals from an order that, inter alia, denied petitioner’s request for additional counsel fees. At the outset, we conclude that Supreme Court erred in determining that the rules embodied in 22 NYCRR part 36 govern the appointment of petitioner’s attorney. Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 36.1 (b) (2) (i) (A), the rules embodied in part 36 “shall not apply to . . . the appointment of, or the appointment of any persons or entities performing services for, . . . a guardian who is a relative of . . . the subject of the guardianship proceeding” and, here, the record establishes that petitioner was the incapacitated person’s third cousin. We also note that neither of the exceptions set forth in 22 NYCRR 36.1 (b) applies to this case ( see 22 NYCRR 36.2 [c] [6], [7]).
We further conclude that the court erred in summarily denying petitioner’s request for additional counsel fees. Instead, the court should have permitted petitioner to render a final report and to petition for judicial settlement thereof ( see Mental Hygiene Law § 81.44 [f]), as well as to seek a determination on all administrative expenses, including counsel fees incurred in providing services to petitioner ( see generally Matter of Albert K. [D’Angelo] , 96 AD3d 750,-2- 605 CA 11-02161
752-753), before summarily concluding that petitioner’s attorney is not entitled to compensation beyond the $28,845 that she has already been paid with respect to this matter. In view of our determination, we do not address petitioner’s remaining contentions.

Entered: July 5, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PATRICK DE LA CRUZ MORENO,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-12-00027-CR

Appeal from

112th District Court

of Pecos County, Texas

(TC # 3061)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Patrick De La Cruz Moreno filed notice of appeal in two 

criminal cases, cause numbers 3061 and 3156, but his attorney has since advised the Court that 

he mistakenly filed notice of appeal in cause number 3061. Finding that there is no final 

judgment or appealable order in the instant case, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where 

there has been a final judgment of conviction. See Workman v. State, 170 Tex.Crim. 621, 343 

S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); Bridle v. State, 16 S.W.3d 906, 907 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 2000, no 

pet.). An appellate court does not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders, unless that 

jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. See TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 44.02 

(West 2006); Bridle, 16 S.W.3d at 907. A final judgment has not been entered in this case and 

Appellant does not allege that there is an appealable interlocutory order. In fact, Appellant’s

attorney has notified the Court that Appellant was not convicted in cause number 3061 because 

the case was re-indicted and Appellant was subsequently convicted in cause number 3156. The 

appeal from that conviction will proceed in Patrick De La Cruz Moreno v. State, cause number 
- 2 -

08-12-00028-CR. We therefore dismiss the appeal arising out of cause number 3061 for want of 

jurisdiction.

May 9, 2012 ________________________________________________

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
----

 Exhibit 32.1 

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent  required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive  Officer of Century Milestone S&T Co., Ltd., that, to his knowledge, the  Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year-ended December 31,  2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition  and results of operations. 

 October 7, 2003 

/s/ Michael Harrop                                                                 Michael Harrop, Chief Executive Officer 

----
PAFT: HFC-125

http://www.afeas.org/paft/hfc-125.html[20/07/2011 17:36:04]

Summary of Testing Results

HFC-125 has very low acute and

subchronic inhalation toxicity.

HFC-125 is not a developmental

toxicant.

HFC-125 is not genotoxic.

PAFT

Programme for Alternative

Fluorocarbon Toxicity Testing

HFC-125 is one of a series of fluorocarbon alternatives being tested by the Programme for Alternative Fluorocarbon

Toxicity Testing (PAFT). HFC-125 is considered primarily as an alternative for refrigeration systems.

HFC-125 has very low acute toxicity by inhalation. The lowest

concentration that causes mortality in experimental animals -- the

approximate lethal concentration (ALC) -- for a 4-hour exposure is

greater than 800,000 ppm (80%) with added oxygen. Even at these

high inhalation concentrations, no clinical signs of toxicity are evident.

As with many other halocarbons and hydrocarbons, inhalation of HFC125, followed by intravenous injection of epinephrine, which simulates

human stress reactions, results in a cardiac sensitization response in

experimental screening studies with dogs. This cardiac sensitization

response is observed at approximately 100,000 ppm of HFC-125, a level well above expected exposures. By

comparison, a cardiac sensitization response is observed with CFC-11 at approximately 5,000 ppm.

In repeated inhalation exposure studies, the low toxicity of HFC-125 continued to be evident. No adverse effects were

observed in rats exposed by inhalation at concentrations of up to 50,000 ppm for up to 90 days.

Inhalation developmental toxicity studies with rats and rabbits have been completed. The results indicate that HFC-125

is not teratogenic and does not cause fetal effects at inhalation concentra- tions up to 50,000 ppm.

In genetic toxicity testing, HFC-125 was not mutagenic in an Ames assay, Chinese Hamster Ovary assay, or

chromosomal aberration study with human lymphocytes. These studies were in vitro assays. Also, HFC-125 was not

active in an in vivo mouse micronucleus study.

Metabolism studies with HFC-125 have not detected any metabolism.

The testing of HFC-125 under PAFT III is now complete. The results are summarized in the sidebar above.

An exposure limit for HFC-125 of 1,000 ppm (8-hour time-weighted average) has been recommended by the

American Industrial Hygiene Association, Workplace Environmental Exposure Limit (WEEL) Committee.

As for all chemicals, PAFT recommends that exposures be kept to a practicable minimum.

September 1995

Last updated October 11, 1996
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY

MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS

111 ARMY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, DC 20310-0111

 

SAMR-EI (690-12a) 20 January 2023 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION

SUBJECT: Posting Department of the Army Accessibility Statement

1. In accordance with Equal Employment Opportunity Commission requirements, an 

accessibility notice of rights must be posted on the agency public web site. 

2. The enclosed document describes the Department of the Army’s commitment to 

accessibility requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the 

Architectural Barriers Act of 1968. Commands must ensure the accessibility statement 

is posted to the command public web site or ensure the command public website links 

to the enclosed document.

3. Point of contact is Ms. Rosemary Salak, Disability Program Manager, Army Equity 

and Inclusion Agency. She may be reached via e-mail at: 

rosemary.salak.civ@army.mil. 

Encl Anselm A. Beach

 Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army

 (Equity and Inclusion Agency) 

DISTRIBUTION:

Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army 

Commander 

U.S. Army Forces Command 

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command 

U.S. Army Materiel Command 

U.S. Army Futures Command 

U.S. Army Pacific 

U.S. Army Europe and Africa 

U.S. Army Central 

U.S. Army North 

U.S. Army South 

(CONT)

DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
2

U.S. Army Special Operations Command 

Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command 

U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command 

U.S. Army Cyber Command 

U.S. Army Medical Command 

U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command 

U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

U.S. Army Military District of Washington 

U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command 

U.S. Army Human Resources Command 

Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy 

Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center 

Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery 

Commandant, U.S. Army War College 

Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency 

CF: 

Director of Business Transformation 

Commander, Eighth Army
State Phone Fax

AK (907) 428-6030 (907) 428-6035

AL 334-271-7244 (334) 271-7232

AR 501-212-5020 501-212-5019

AZ 602-267-2550 602-267-2495

CA 916-854-3304 916-854-3630

CO 720-250-1050/1051 720-250-1059

CT 860-524-4857 860-524-4902 

DC 202-685-9860/62 202-685-9849

DE 302-326-7010 302-326-7009

FL 904-823-0168 904-823-0112

GA 678-569-3855 678-569-6063

GU 671-735-0409 671-734-4081

HI 808-733-4241/58 808-733-4236

IA 515-252-4582 515-252-4656

ID 208-422-5268 208-422-6418

IL 217-761-3569 217-761-3527

IN 317-247-3105 317-247-3146

KS 785-274-1192 785-274-1622 or 785-720-8622

KY 502-607-1556 502-607-1260

LA 318-641-3864 318-641-3865

MA 508-233-6562 508-233-6585

MD 410-576-6179 410-576-1454

ME 207-626-4390 207-626-4509

MI 517-481-8140 517-481-8145

MN 651-268-8949 651-282-4541

MO 573-638-9846 573-638-9848

MS 601-313-6184 601-313-6176

MT 406-324-3009 406-324-3011

NC 919-664-6242 919-664-6500

ND 701-333-2007 701-333-2017

NE 402-309-7300 402-309-7310

NH 603-225-1340 603-227-1508

NJ 609-530-6939 609-530-6963

NM 505-474-1206 505-474-1289

NV 775-887-7252 775-887-7256

NY 518-786-4581 518-786-4649

OH 614-336-7449 614-336-7410

OK 405-228-5212 405-606-7274

OR 503-584-3885 503-584-3912

PA 717-861-8468 717-861-8211

PR (787) 289-1474/75/79 (787) 723-6360

RI 401-275-4193 401-275-4338

SC 803-806-4327 803-806-4399

SD 605-737-6721 605-737-6264

TN 615-313-0662 615-313-3129

TX 512-782-5050 512-782-1034
UT 801-523-4407 801-523-4685

VA 804-539-1451 804-371-0073

VI 340-712-7750 340-712-7767

VT 802-338-3324 802-338-3247

WA 253-512-8005 253-512-8401

WI 608-242-3053 608-242-3051

WV 304-341-6628 304-341-6475

WY 307-772-5253 307-772-5132
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

TAMERA BROWN, et al.

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al.

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO: 1:18-CV-00412

Judge Susan J. Dlott

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO ANSWER AND FILE 

MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENTON THE PLEADINGS

Defendants respectfully move the Court for an extension of time to answer Plaintiffs’ 

Second Amended Complaint filed February 4, 2019. Plaintiffs do not object to this extension.

Defendants do not seek the extension to delay this litigation. Defendants Sentinel Police 

Association and Danita Pettis in her individual capacity served Plaintiffs Tamera Brown and Joy 

Ludgatis with Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents on December 3, 2018. 

Plaintiffs have not responded to Defendants discovery demands to date but the parties have 

conferred and Plaintiffs have represented that they will provide verified responses to Defendants’ 

Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents no later than March 1, 2019. 

Defendants seek this extension so that Defendants have all information to adequately answer the 

Second Amended Complaint and prepare Defendants’ Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings. 

Defendants respectfully request the Court Order the following:

1. Defendants’ Answer to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint 03/08/19

2. Defendants’ Deadline to File Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 03/22/19

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 24 Filed: 02/19/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 454
Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Janaya Trotter Bratton 

Alphonse A. Gerhardstein (0032053)

Janaya Trotter Bratton (0084123)

Gerhardstein & Branch Co. LPA

441 Vine Street, Suite 3400

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Tel (513) 621-9100 

Fax (513) 345-5543

jtbratton@gbfirm.com

agerhardstein@gbfirm.com

Counsel for Defendants Sentinel Police 

Association and Danita Pettis, 

Individually

/s/ Shuva J. Paul 

Peter J. Stackpole (0072103)

Emily Woerner (0089349)

Shuva J. Paul (0088484)

City of Cincinnati

Room 214, City Hall

801 Plum Street

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Tel (513) 352-4551

Fax (513) 352-1515

Peter.stackpole@cincinnati-oh.gov

Emily.woerner@cincinnati-oh.gov

Shuva.paul@cincinnati-oh.gov

Counsel for City Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 19, 2019 a copy of the foregoing pleading was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties for whom counsel has entered an 

appearance by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing 

through the Court’s system. 

s/ Janaya Trotter Bratton

 

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 24 Filed: 02/19/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 455
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882343
<NAME> 90BC
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          62,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,932
<PP&E>                                       9,604,752
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,764,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,002,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,147
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,974,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,002,943
<SALES>                                        153,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,346
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,618)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,618)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case: 2:18-mj-00636-KAJ Doc #: 7 Filed: 08/29/18 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: 18