alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00431]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Non-Pharmacological Clinical Trials.
    Date: February 8, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Regina Tousignant Dolan-Sewell, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 4154, MSC 9606, 
Bethesda, MD 20852, [email protected]

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Service Ready Tools for Suicide Prevention.
    Date: February 11, 2022.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Nicholas Gaiano, Ph.D., Review Branch Chief, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center/Room 6150/MSC 9606, 6001 Executive 
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-2742, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00431 Filed 1-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Global Perspective Portfolio L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      18,190,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,961<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,526,160<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,526,160<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,089,647<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,635,927
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,453,720
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,453,720
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,453,720
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include due from DWR of $41,617 and interest
receivable of $61,344.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $3,233,109.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $733,285, accrued
management fees of $53,746 and accrued administrative expenses payable
of $27,694.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $1,485,333, net
change in unrealized of $2,028,411 and interest income of $575,903.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

RUDOLPH EBINGER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 234 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 504 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 504

Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 
           Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2020

    Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mr. Rubio) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 
           Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018.

Whereas, on February 14, 2018, a mass shooting that took the lives of 17 
        teachers and students took place at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School 
        in Parkland, Florida;
Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for the individuals who 
        were affected by this tragedy;
Whereas President Donald Trump stated, ``no child, no teacher, should ever be in 
        danger in an American school. No parent should ever have to fear for 
        their sons and daughters when they kiss them goodbye in the morning.'';
Whereas the Parkland community has shown strength, compassion, and unity in the 
        past 2 years; and
Whereas February 14, 2020, marks 2 years since the horrific attack: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the memories of the victims of the senseless 
        attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 
        2018, and offers heartfelt condolences and deepest sympathies 
        to the families, loved ones, and friends of the victims;
            (2) honors the survivors of the attack and pledges 
        continued support for their recovery;
            (3) recognizes the strength and resilience of the Marjory 
        Stoneman Douglas High School community; and
            (4) expresses gratitude to the emergency medical and health 
        care professionals of the Parkland community for their efforts 
        in responding to the attack and caring for the victims and 
        survivors.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Garb Oil & Power Corporation, and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John C. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: 10/11/2008

By: /s/ John C. Brewer
--------------------------
John C. Brewer Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending October 1, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 123 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1437. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of H.R. 1437, the 

3 Clerk of the House of Representatives shall amend the 

4 title so as to read: ‘‘Making further continuing appropriaVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:22 Dec 16, 2022 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC123.RDS HC123

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 123 RDS 

1 tions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023, and 

2 for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 

By KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Deputy Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ PAUL G. GABOSPaul G. GabosChief Financial Officer


August 9, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  and  consolidated  statements  of  income  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997 
<CASH>                                         1,531,717
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    396,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      534,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0 
<PP&E>                                        20,750,579 
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                27,232,050 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                    14,202,993 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  27,232,050 
<SALES>                                          213,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,763,640
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,943,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 234,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 225,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               731,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  820,031
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              820,031 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     820,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       5.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       5.79
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COST PLUS, INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     70,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,833
<PP&E>                                         100,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,141
<SALES>                                        315,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,135
<CGS>                                          200,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  292,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,698
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,462
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,236
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98<F1>
<FN>
<F1> Per share data is restated for a three-for-two common stock split effective
March 11, 1999 for shareholders of record on March 1, 1999. Prior Financial Data
Schedules have not been restated for the re-capitalization.
</FN> 
         

</TABLE>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS

JASON S. SEXTON, 

Petitioner, : Case No. 2:18-cv-424 

- vs - District Judge George C. Smith 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

LYNEAL WAINRIGHT, Warden, 

 Marion Correctional Institution 

 : 

 Respondent. 

ORDER GRANTING EXPANSION OF THE RECORD AND 

DENYING REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS 

 

 This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to Expand the Record 

(ECF No. 14) with the materials attached to that Motion. Because the materials are relevant to 

Petitioner’s defense against the Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5) and their addition 

to the record will not violate the rule in Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011), the Motion is 

GRANTED. 

 The case is also before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to order Respondent to provide 

him with “copies of the transcript.” (ECF No. 13, PageID 166.) When Magistrate Judge Vascura 

ordered the State to respond, she specifically recognized the possibility that the response might be 

a motion and ordered that Respondent file “those portions of the state court record needed to 

adjudicate any defense made in the response (Order, ECF No. 2, PageID 22). No transcripts were 

included in the State Court Record as filed (ECF No. 4). Petitioner asserts that he needs transcripts 

of the plea and sentencing hearings “to help prove the merits of his due process claim the state trial 
2 

court failed to inform him of his appellate rights, and his claim of ineffective assistance of trial 

counsel.” (ECF No. 13, PageID 168). 

 In his Reply/Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, Sexton refers to the sentencing transcript 

as proof that he was not made aware of the Capital Procedure Requirements or the fact a Single 

Trial Judge lacks authority to accept a guilty plea in a death penalty case.” (ECF No. 15, PageID 

184). He claims the same document would show his counsel failed to consult with him about 

pursuing a direct appeal. Id. at PageID 188. 

 For purposes of the Motion to Dismiss, the Magistrate Judge assumes the truth of these two 

assertions by Petitioner, to wit, that (1) he was not made aware of the Capital Procedure 

Requirements or the fact a Single Trial Judge lacks authority to accept a guilty plea in a death 

penalty case, and (2) his counsel failed to consult with him about pursuing a direct appeal. If the 

case survives the Motion to Dismiss, the State will be ordered to file the referenced transcripts 

Petitioner’s Motion that they be furnished now is DENIED. 

September 27, 2018. 

 s/ Michael R. Merz

 United States Magistrate Judge
#### McMahen *v.*Missouri Pacific Railroad Company.

4-2698

Opinion delivered October 31, 1932.

*Crumpton <& Crumpton*and *Jones & Jones,*for appellant.

*R. E. Wiley*and *Henry Bonham,*for appellee.

Humphreys, J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in instructing a verdict for appellee upon the ground that appellant had not established by any substantial testimony that he was engaged in interstate commerce at the time he claimed he was injured. By so instructing the jury, the trial court eliminated all issues joined on liability, assumed risk, contributory negligence, etc., holding that the Miller County Circuit Court had no jurisdiction to try and determine the cause under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, upon which act appellant sought to recover.

The testimony, viewed in its most favorable light to appellant, showed that he received the injury complained of while engaged in inspecting and repairing a switch engine, numbered 516, constantly theretofore used, and was thereafter to be used, indiscriminately in making and breaking up trains and in placing cars employed in interstate and intrastate commerce in the yard owned by ap-*400pellee; that said engine was removed into the roundhouse situated in the yard for the federal monthly routine inspection, and for such repairs as the inspection might disclose to he necessary under order of the United States Government: that the engine needed only the removal of the main throttle and draw-bar for inspection and the tightening of nuts, binders, etc., and the packing of valves, which would require about a day to do after beginning the inspection; that the engine was in the roundhouse three days altogether, and was returned to the switch yard for its accustomed use after being inspected and repaired; that a report of the inspection and repairs made was mailed to the Interstate Commerce Commission; that the injury complained of was received while the engine was being inspected and repaired.

We do not think driving the engine out of the yard into the roundhouse for its federal monthly routine inspection and for necessary repairs disclosed by said inspection, which were of a minor nature, under order of the United States Government, changed its character as an interstate instrumentality, especially in the light of the fact that it was to be and was returned to its accustomed use as soon as inspected and repaired.

It was not a road engine removed from an interstate haul indefinitely or for any considerable length of time for repairs, nor was it a disabled, broken-down engine which was to all intents and purposes out of commission.

The facts stated above differentiate the instant case from the cases of *Minneapolis*& *St. Louis Railroad Company*v. Winters, 242 U. S. 253, 37 S. Ct. 170, and *Hines, Director General,*v. *Industrial Accident Commission,*184 Cal. 1, 192 Pac. 859, 14 A. L. R. 720, relied upon by ap-pellee for an affirmance of the judgment.

The judgment of dismissal is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial of the case upon its merits under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act.