alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 67 Filed: 10/19/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 472
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6847

BENNY EDWARD LEE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus D. SCOTT DODRILL, Warden, L.S.C.I. Butner, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-167-5-3F) Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benny Edward Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Benny Edward Lee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We note that, even if the district court had jurisdiction to review Lee’s claim under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the sentence would not be in error because his 108-month sentence did not exceed the applicable statutory maximum. See United States v. Angle , 254 F.3d 514 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 2001 WL 995333 (U.S. Oct. 1, 2001) (No. 01-5838). Thus, any such claim would lack merit. We affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. Dodrill , No. CA-01-167-5-3F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 22
  
  
  
  Subsidiaries of Raytech Corporation               Incorporated
  
  Raytech Composites, Inc.                            Delaware
  Suite 512, One Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484
  
  Raytech Powertrain, Inc.                            Delaware
  Suite 512, One Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484
  
  Raytech Fasteners, Inc.                             Delaware
  Suite 512, One Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484
  
  Raybestos Products Company                          Delaware
  1204 Darlington Avenue
  Crawfordsville, IN 47933
  
  AFM Management Company                              Michigan
  44650 Merrill Road
  Sterling Heights, MI 48314                          
  
  Raybestos U.K. Ltd.                                 England
  16, Spindus Road
  Speke
  Liverpool L24 1YA, England
  
  Raytech Composites Europe GmbH                      Germany
  Bahnstrasse 48-50
  5608 Radevormwald, Germany
  
  Raybestos Industrie-Produkte GmbH                   Germany
  Industriestrasse, 7
  D-54497 Morbach, Germany  
  
  Raybestos Reibtechnik GmbH                          Germany
  Quettingerstrasse, 220
  D-51381 Leverkusen 3, Germany
  
  Allomatic Products Company                          Delaware
  609 E. Chaney    
  Sullivan, IN 47882            
  
  Raybestos Aftermarket Products Company              Delaware
  964 East Market Street
  Crawfordsville, IN 47933
  
  Miami Rivet Company                                 Delaware
  Suite 512, One Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484
Exhibit 10.81


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2


TO


SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”), dated as of January 12,
2009, amends that certain Severance Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered
into on June 25, 2008, by and between Force Protection, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”), and Charles Mathis (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, in
order to correct a “scrivener’s error in the language in Section 5 of the
Agreement, the Company and the Executive desire to enter into this Amendment to
amend certain provisions of the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
for and in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and
agreements in the Agreement and herein, the Company and the Executive hereby
agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Capitalized Terms. 
Capitalized terms that are not defined in this Amendment shall have the
meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.


 


2.                                       Section 5 of the Agreement is amended in
its entirety to read as follows:


 


“5.                                 Payments Upon Non-Qualifying
Termination of Employment.  If the Executive’s employment with the
Company shall terminate by reason of a Nonqualifying Termination, then the
Company shall pay to the Executive (or the Executive’s beneficiary or estate)
within thirty (30) days following the Date of Termination, a lump-sum cash
amount equal to the Accrued Amounts (other than the amount described in Section 3(a)(ii) if
the Executive is terminated by the Company for Cause) and provide the Other
Benefits.”


 


3.                                       Counterparts.  This
Amendment may be executed (including by facsimile transmission confirmed
promptly thereafter by actual delivery of executed counterparts) in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


4.                                       Governing Law.  This
Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with,
the internal laws of the State of South Carolina without regard to the
principle of conflicts of laws.


 


5.                                       Headings.  Section headings
are for convenience only and shall not be considered a part of this Amendment.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have caused this Amendment No. 2 to
be executed, effective as of the date first
written above.


 


 


	
   

  	
  FORCE PROTECTION, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Lenna Ruth Macdonald

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Lenna Ruth Macdonald

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Chief Strategy
  Officer, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EXECUTIVE

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Charles Mathis

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Charles Mathis

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 86 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 86

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2019

Mr. Blunt submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected members of the following joint committees of Congress:
    Joint Committee on Printing: Mr. Blunt, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Wicker, 
Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Udall.
    Joint Committee of Congress on the Library: Mr. Blunt, Mr. Roberts, 
Mr. Shelby, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Leahy.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          80,580
<SECURITIES>                                    31,086
<RECEIVABLES>                                  210,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,988
<INVENTORY>                                     25,758
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               461,293
<PP&E>                                       2,152,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                 482,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,398,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          265,476
<BONDS>                                        482,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,742
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,456,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,398,003
<SALES>                                        638,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               642,264
<CGS>                                          418,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               165,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,629
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,925
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,704
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 
  Simmons Bank,  
Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
May 9, 2019  By   
/S/ NANCY WILLIS
   Nancy Willis   Vice President**
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PowerSecure International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  May 7, 2009
    /s/ Christopher T. HutterChristopher T. HutterVice President, Chief Financial
Officer,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PowerSecure International, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  August 7, 2008
    /s/ Christopher T. HutterChristopher T. HutterVice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 69 Filed 08/20/2004 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 69 Filed 08/20/2004 Page 2 of 2
#### Norman MOORE, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Appellants, v. Jesse M. CALHOON, as President, or Herbert W. Peters, as Secretary-Treasurer, or Arthur Grundmeyer, as Branch Agent of New Orleans District 1 of the National Marine Engineer’s Beneficial Association, Appellees.

No. 21833.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

March 31, 1965.

Joseph J. Laura, Jr., Laura, Danna & Simmons, New Orleans, La., for appellants.

Thomas J. Meunier, New Orleans, La., Lee Pressman, David Scribner, Pressman & Scribner, New York City, for defendants-appellees, Joan Stern Kiok, of counsel.

Before WOODBURY* WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges.

*

**Of the First Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

It appearing without dispute that defendants in the court below followed the statute, 29 U.S.C.A. § 411(a) (3) (A) (ii), and complied with the union’s national constitution on the dues increase question, the entry of summary judgment was correct.

Affirmed.
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: May 19, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0864 

Federal Express Corporation 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2014SW700042 

Respondent 

DISMISSAL ORDER 

On May 17, 2016, the Complainant filed aN otice of Withdrawal of Second Amended 

Complaint, stating that, upon further review, they have determined legal enforcement action is 

not warranted in this case. 

Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint without the 

consent of the administrative law judge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such 

withdrawal, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the case with prejudice. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that these proceedings are dismissed with prejudice. As a 

result, the prehearing conference scheduled for June 15, 2016 is cancelled. 

Attachment: Service List 

--p~-- ~LAS M. RAWALD 

Administrative Law Judge 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591. 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Greg Stofko, Respondent's Counsel 

1700 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Suite 950 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

TEL: 202-393-9285 

FAX: 202-628-0654 

EMAIL: greg.stofko@fedex.com 

Allan H. Horowitz, Respondent's Counsel 

Dentons US LLP 

1900 K Street NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

TEL: 202-496-7356 

James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division, Southwest 

10101 Hillwood Parkway 

Fort Worth, TX 76177 

TEL: 817-222-5074 

FAX: 817-222-5945 

ONE COPY 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-0864 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. MaiL For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 
The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536
#### People v Barnes,

No. 90394.

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of *People v Milbourn,*435 Mich 630 (1990). MCR 7.302(F)(1). In all other respects leave to appeal is denied. Court of Appeals No: 111897.
Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 1 of 10  PAGEID #: 1939

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 2 of 10  PAGEID #: 1940

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 3 of 10  PAGEID #: 1941

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 4 of 10  PAGEID #: 1942

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 5 of 10  PAGEID #: 1943

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 6 of 10  PAGEID #: 1944

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 7 of 10  PAGEID #: 1945

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 8 of 10  PAGEID #: 1946

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 9 of 10  PAGEID #: 1947

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 128 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 10 of 10  PAGEID #: 1948
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Steve Nicandros, Luis Giusti, Tyler Nelson and Frontera Resources

Corporation v. Zaza Mamulaishvil i , individuall y and derivatively on

behalf of Frontera Resources C o rporation

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00125

- CV

Trial court case number: 2021

- 03816

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration and stay

proceedings. Co unsel for Appell ee Zaz a Mamulaishvi li filed a motion to withdraw, stating they

“ ha [ve] been unable to communicate with Mr. Mamulaishvili in a mann er consistent with good

attorney

- client relations. ” They further state Appell ee “ has not m et his financial obli g a tions

under the te rms of his engagement letter ” and that counsel adv ised Appell ee they would seek to

withdraw if Appell ee did not “ p rovide [counsel] with the financial resources necessary to

continue [Appell ee ’ s] representat ion. ”

Counsel ’ s motion complie s with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 in that they state

t he re are no current deadlines or settings and that they have advis ed A ppell ee by email and first

class and certified mail to A ppell ee ’s last kno w n address of the motion and of A ppell ee ’s right t o

object. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(a). Although we held this motion for more than ten days,

A ppell ee d id not respon d . W e grant the motion to withdraw.

Counsel must immediately notify A ppel l ee i n writing of any deadlines in this appeal that

have n ot been previously di sclosed to A ppell ee and file a copy of this notice with the clerk of

this C ourt within ten days of the d ate of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s / Veronica Rivas

- Molloy

Acting individ ually

Date: De cember 7 , 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NATALIA NICOLE 

HOFFMAN-SHAW, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:18-cv-836 

 v. JUDGE SARAH D. MORRISON 

 Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of a Report and Recommendation issued 

by the Magistrate Judge on May 6, 2019. (ECF No. 18). The time for filing objections has 

passed, and no objections have been filed. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and 

Recommendation. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Court 

OVERRULES Plaintiff’s statement of specific errors and AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s 

decision. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with this Order and 

terminate this case from the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Ohio, Eastern Division. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Sarah D. Morrison_______________ 

 SARAH D. MORRISON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.50

[Pfizer letterhead]

                                                  John L. LaMattina, Ph.D.
                                                  Vice President, Pfizer Inc
                                                  Executive Vice President, PGRD
                                                  President, Worldwide Research

June 13, 2002



George Vlasuk
Corvas International Inc.
3030 Science Park Road
San Diego, California 92121-1102


Dear George:


In accordance with Section 18.4 of the License and Development Agreement, dated
October 14, 1995 between Corvas International, Inc. and Pfizer Inc, including
Pfizer Limited (the " 1995 Agreement"), Pfizer has terminated the development in
all indications of Neutrophil Inhibitory Factor and terminates the 1995
Agreement.

Pfizer and Corvas shall meet at a date to be determined to discuss the transfer
of materials and documents from Pfizer to Corvas to fulfill the obligations of
Pfizer under the 1995 Agreement.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ JOHN L. LAMATTINA
John. L. LaMattina