alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PA TROBERT S KANSA S AGRICULTUR E 10 9 HAR TSENAT E OFFIC E BUILDIN G WASHINGTON . D

C 20510-160 5 202-224-477 4 hRp://rabflns.senats.go v 

# Bnitt d^mtt B Senat e WASHINGTON , D C 20510-160 5 Octobers , 201 0 FINANC E HEALTH , EDUCATION , LABOR , AN D PENSION S

ETHIC S RULE S Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretar yo fTransportatio n Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerseyAve. , S E Washington , DC 2059 0 Dea rMr . Secretary : _ I writ e i n suppor

t o fth e applicatio n fro m th e Manhattan , Kansa s Regiona l Airpor t fo rth e Smal l Communit

yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m grant . I appreciat e you rtakin g th e tim e t o reviewthei rproposal . Th e Manhatta n Regiona l Airport (MHK ) i s locate d i n nort h centra l Kansa s an d serve s th e Manhatta n are a an d severa l smal l rura l communitie s locate d nearby . Th e airpor t als o plays a n importan t trave l rol e fo rsoldier s an d civilian s travelin g fro m nearb yFor t Riley . Th e Manhatta n Regiona l Airport seeks fundin g t o increas e AC Apassenge rus e retentio n fro m 1 8 percen t t o 3 0 percent . Th e Increas e i n passenge rdeman d wil l ensur e th e curren t servic e i s self-sustainin g an d wil l als o b e a drivin g forc e fo radditiona l flights , large r alrcraft s an d newdestinations . T o achiev e thi s increas e i n traffic , the ypla n t o us e differen t type s o fmarketin g an d advertisin g tha t wil l Includ e traditiona l media , websites , community marketin g an d events . Additionally , thi s fundin g woul d allowth e Manhatta n Regiona l Airpor t t o provid e bot h a convenien t an d affordabl e optio n fo rai rtrave l t o th e loca l community . Ai rservic e i s a n essentia l transportatio n elemen t i n th e stat e o fKansas . I continu e t o suppor t th e aviatio n industry , fro m manufacturin g airplane s t o landin g the m safel yi n ou r communities . I a m confiden t tha t thi s gran t woul d b e ofgrea t benefi t t o Manhatta n an d th e stat e o fKansas . Pleas e accep t thi s lette ra s recognitio n ofm ysuppor t fo rthi s project an d gran t application . Wit h ever ybes t wish .

PR : m l
Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 1 of 11  PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 2 of 11  PAGEID #: 2

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 3 of 11  PAGEID #: 3

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 4 of 11  PAGEID #: 4

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 5 of 11  PAGEID #: 5

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 6 of 11  PAGEID #: 6

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 7 of 11  PAGEID #: 7

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 8 of 11  PAGEID #: 8

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 9 of 11  PAGEID #: 9

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 10 of 11  PAGEID #: 10

Case: 2:18-mj-00527-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page: 11 of 11  PAGEID #: 11
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 27, 2017

No. 04-17-00096-CV

IN RE Carolina GARZA

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On February 22, 2017, Relator Carolina Garza filed a petition for writ of mandamus with 

this Court. Relator has not filed a certified or sworn copy of the order of which she complains in 

her petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A). Relator is ordered to supplement the mandamus 

record with a certified or sworn copy of the order being challenged by her petition for writ of 

mandamus within ten days of this of this order.

It is so ORDERED on February 27, 2017.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14-05-53192-CV, styled Carolina Garza v. UV Logistics, LLC and Alex 

Rodriguez, pending in the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas, the Honorable Richard C. Terrell

presiding.
#### Beulah LOVETT *v.*Lona TURNER, Adm’x of The Estate of William LOVETT, deceased

74-44

510 S.W. 2d 569

Opinion delivered June 10, 1974

[Rehearing denied July 15, 1974.]

*Haley & Claycomb,*for appellant.

*Paul K. Roberts,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Following our reversal and remand in *Lovett*v. *Lovett,*254 Ark. 349, 493 S.W. 2d 435 (1973), for the determination of William Lovett’s mental competency to maintain a divorce action, the trial court after the taking of additional evidence granted appellee William Lovett a divorce on three years separation but awarded to appellant Beulah Lovett her statutory property rights on the basis that appellee was at fault. For reversal appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that appellee had the mental capacity to maintain the divorce action.

The record shows that appellee again testified before the court and that in addition several other witnesses testified that appellee, although under a Veterans Administration Guardianship, carried on a normal life. On the other hand appellant produced evidence which if believed would have shown that appellee was not mentally competent. On the record before us we cannot say that the Chancellor’s finding on the issue of mental incompetency is contrary to a preponderance of the evidence. It therefore follows that the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Brian Garrett, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

V.

The Ohio State University,

Defendant.

Steve Snyder Hill, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

V.

The Ohio State University,

Defendant.

Civil Action 2:18-cv-692

Judge Michael H. Watson

Magistrate Judge Deavers

Civil Action 2:18-cv-736

Judge Michael H. Watson

Magistrate Judge Deavers

ORDER

Certain plalntifFs In these consolidated lawsuits move for the appointment

of Rex Sharp, Joseph G. Sauder, and B. Robert Allard as Interim Class Counsel.

Mot., ECF No. 53. Given that these cases are currently In mediation before the

Honorable Michael R. Barrett, the Court DENIES that motion without prejudice.

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 113 Filed: 09/26/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 665
Plaintiffs may renew their motion at the conciusion of mediation efforts, if desired.

However, new plaintiffs with different counsel have filed new lawsuits since this

motion was fiied. Accordingiy, shouid these piaintiffs again move for

appointment of interim Class Counsel, the Court will entertain competing motions

for appointment and permit ail parties to respond to any renewed motion.

The Cierk shaii terminate ECF No. 53 as an active motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 113 Filed: 09/26/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 666
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Michael A. Bohm, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 12, 2006



/s/ Michael A. BohmName:

Michael A. BohmTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Stephen Pelletier, Chief Executive Officer and President of Prudential Annuities Life
Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 12, 2010



| |  |                                                |  |  |  | 
| |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
| |  | /s/  Stephen Pelletier                         |  |  |  | 
| |  | Name:    Stephen Pelletier                    
| |  | Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Kenneth Y.
Tanji, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2009



/s/ Kenneth Y. TanjiName:

Kenneth Y. TanjiTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### People v Boulton,

No. 91333;

Court of Appeals No. 122138.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Abaxis, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  August 9, 2010
    /s/ Alberto R. Santa InesAlberto R. Santa InesChief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance
#### DONALD F. DUNCAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROYAL TOPS MANUFACTURING CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14652.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

March 3, 1965.

Owen J. Ooms, Francis T. Drumm, Chicago, 111., for plaintiff-appellant.

Mark H. Sparrow, Maxwell E. Sparrow, and Sparrow & Sparrow, New York City, for defendant-appellee Royal Tops Mfg. Co., Inc.

Before SCHNACKENBERG, ENOCH and MAJOR, Circuit Judges.

MAJOR, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is in a case companion to Donald F. Duncan, Inc. v. Royal Tops Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Randy Brown, 7 Cir., 343 F.2d 655, in which the facts giving rise to the controversy between the parties may be found. It is sufficient to note that Honorable J. Sam Perry, a Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, on January 17, 1964, entered a judgment by which the defendants were permanently enjoined and restrained from infringing plaintiff’s trademark “Yo-Yo.” Defendants appealed from this judgment, which is reversed by this Court in an opinion rendered herewith.

Plaintiff appeals from the decision of Honorable James B. Parsons, a Judge of the same Court, discharging plaintiff’s rule to show cause why defendant should not be held in contempt of court for violating the restraining order entered in the main action. The Court heard testimony, and made its findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which its discharge order was entered.

Plaintiff on brief states, “The only contested issue is whether the trial court can derogate Plaintiff’s right to have the injunction order enforced.” Plaintiff argues in support of this issue that it was entitled as a matter of law to the relief sought and that the Court was without discretion in the matter.

In view of the issue as presented, we think there is no occasion to set forth or discuss the evidence which the Court had before it. This is so because in our judgment the Court had such discretion, which was not abused; in fact, we think it was wisely exercised.

That the Court was vested with discretion has under similar circumstances been held by this Court. In Miller v. *670Zaharias et al., 7 Cir., 168 F.2d 1, 3, the Court stated:

> “As we have frequently held, the action of the trial court upon a charge of contempt is discretionary in character and is not to be reversed except for abuse of such discretion or unless clearly erroneous.”

Again this Court, under circumstances similar to those here, in Jewel Tea Co., Inc. v. Kraus, 7 Cir., 204 F.2d 549, 551, stated:

> “The rule has been stated, ‘ * * * punishment for contempt rests in the sound discretion of the trial court in the absence of legal restriction, it is not ordinarily reviewable, and where the court has jurisdiction in contempt proceedings its judgment will not be disturbed except where such discretion has been grossly abused * * *.’ ”

In support of this statement we cited and quoted from In re Sobol, 242 F. 487, 489 (2nd Cir.).

The judgment appealed from is Affirmed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIM INAL AP P EALS OF TEXAS N O . W R - 6 2 , 0 1 0 - 0 2

E X P A R T E M I T C H E L L J O H N S O N , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O . 8 9 6 3 3 6 - B I N T H E 1 7 6 D I S T R I C T C O U R T T H F R O M H A R R I S C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O R D E R A p p l i c a n t w a s c o n v i c t e d o f a s s a u l t o n a p u b l i c s e r v a n t a n d s e n t e n c e d t o t w e n t y - f i v e y e a r s ’ i m p r i s o n m e n t
. T h e F i r s t C o u r t o f A p p e a l s a f f i r m e d h i s c o n v i c t i o n . J

o h n s o n v . S t a t e , N o . 0 1

- 0 2

- 0 1 0 3 5
- C R ( T e x . A p p . — H o u s t o n [ 1 ] J a n . 8 , 2 0 0 4 )

. Applicant filed this application s t for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k fo rwarded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. A f t e r a r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d , w e f i n d t h a t A p p l i c a n t ’ s c l a i m s r e g a r d i n g h i s s t r e e t t i m e
a n d p a r o l e a r e w i t h o u t m e r i t
. T h e r e f o r e , w e d e n y r e l i e f

. A p p l i c a n t ’ s c l a i m s c h a l l e n g i n g h i s c o n v i c t i o n a r e d i s m i s s e d p u r s u a n t t o T E X . C O D EC R IM . P R O . A r t
. 1 1
. 0 7 § 4
.

Deliver ed: Dec ember 9, 2020 Do not publish
#### People v Lesley,

No. 91101;

Court of Appeals No. 127442.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                         227,818
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               321,426
<PP&E>                                          96,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,982,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       129,347
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,749,606)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,732
<SALES>                                      1,595,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,599,255
<CGS>                                          604,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,477,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (878,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (878,419)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (878,419)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Garb Oil & Power Corporation, and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John C. Brewer, Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of our knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: 10/11/2005                          By: /s/ John C. Brewer
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John C. Brewer
                                             Acting Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION

I, James Joyce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Aethlon Medical, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2007

                                        /S/ JAMES A. JOYCE
                                        -----------------------------
                                        JAMES A. JOYCE
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                        (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)