alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 

1720 Big Lake RJ . 

Cloquet. MN 55720 

Phone c21 k) R79-..J..'i93 

Fax (21Rl ~79--J. I-1-6 

Chatn'<>lllall 

Karen R. Dhcr 

S.:L rctar~ iTr.:"'urcr 

Ferdinand 1\lartincau, Jr. 

Dt'l I I cpn:,cnta!J\<: 

\\all) Dupuis 

[)1,1 I I Rcprc,cnta!l' L' 

l>a\ id R. Ticsscn, .Jr. 

J)J,t 111 RcprL·,cnt<~ t\c 

J\:c, in R. Dupuis, Sr. 

I·\ccuti,·c Dtrcctnr. 

1 ri 1al Pmgranh 

Chuck \\"alt 

1:\ccutt\ c Din:ctor. 

Entnprt''-'' 

\lirhad Himango 

Reservation Business Committee 

July 1, 2014 

Mr. Fred Leutner 

Office of Science & Technology (Mail Code 4305T) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20460 

E-mail Leutner.Fred@epa.gov 

RE: Potential Reinterpretation ofthe Clean Water Act (CWA) Provisions regarding 

Treatment in a Similar Manner to States (T AS) 

Dear Mr. Leutner: 

The Fond duLac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (the Band) is pleased to submit 

comments in support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as it 

considers a reinterpretation of the rules governing tribal application for Treatment as an 

Affected State (TAS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA) for Section 303(c), Water 

Quality Standards. Currently, Tribes must demonstrate their own inherent regulatory 

authority, which can be challenging and resource intensive. The potential 

reinterpretation, which would eliminate the "Montana Test" by stating that CWA 

Section 518 is a delegation by Congress to eligible Tribes to administer CW A 

regulatory programs over their entire reservations regardless of land ownership, will 

allow Tribes to exercise their sovereignty by our ability and willingness to accept this 

delegation. 

The Band successfully applied to EPA for TAS under the CW A in May 1996, and 

received full approval of our Water Quality Standards in December 2001. Our 

experience with the T AS requirements was much simpler than that which most tribes 

today face, and we were able to complete our application entirely with existing staff 

and in-house legal department, unlike many tribes who face stiff challenges to their 

exercise of sovereign authority over tribal waters. 

The Band believes EPA's proposed reinterpretation will clarify and strengthen the 

inherent regulatory authority of sovereign tribes to implement EPA statutes within 

reservations regardless of land ownership. Reinterpretation would validate the legal 

basis for tribal assertion of regulatory jurisdiction under the CW A and decrease the 

administrative burden of case-by-case assessments of tribal authority 

As Tribal leader of the Fond duLac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, I support EPA's 

efforts to reinterpret provisions of the CW A regarding the TAS process. Thank you 

for the opportunity to provide comments on this potential rule change. 

Respectfully, 

i~Chairwoman ~
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

JEAN-ROBERT CADET : Case No. C-1-01-131

Plaintiff, :

: 

Honorable Judge Weber 

Magistrate Judge Hogan

v. 

:

:

: 

MADEIRA CITY SCHOOL 

DISTRICT BOARD OF 

EDUCATION, et al. 

Defendants. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

PLAINTIFF’S EXCEPTIONS AND 

OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ 

BILL OF COSTS 

 

Plaintiff Jean-Robert Cadet submits these preliminary exceptions and objections to the 

Bill of Costs filed by Defendants. Pursuant to the procedures of this court, “Guidelines for 

Attorneys Taxation of Court Costs In The Southern District of Ohio,” Plaintiff reserves the right 

to file a Motion to Review The Clerk’s Taxation of Costs following any action taken by the 

Clerk on Defendants’ Bill of Costs. 

MEMORANDUM 

 Plaintiff submits that the following items submitted by Defendants as taxable costs are 

inappropriate as taxable costs by law and the custom and practice of this court: 

Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 81 Filed 12/18/2003 Page 1 of 3
(1) Mileage fees for witness Clare Stork from Columbus, Ohio, of 224 miles. Columbus is 

not within the Southern District, and the fees for this should be limited to 100 miles, or to the 

amount of $36.00, not $80.64. 

(2) Plaintiff respectfully asserts that no fees for depositions should be allowed as costs, 

because the practice of this Court is to require prior approval by the Court, which Defendants 

never obtained. In the alternative, Plaintiff asserts that costs for copies are not taxable. 

Defendants’ Bill of Costs includes line items for copies of deposition transcripts for Christopher 

Mate, ($374.60), Michelle Hummell, ($305.60), Paul Imhoff, ($213.60), Kay Fluharty, ($95.00), 

Richard Schneider, ($83.60), Martin Strifler, ($114.90), Elizabeth Vaccari, ($28.50); See 

Bowman v. West Disinfecting Company (E.D. N.Y. 1960), 25 F.R.D. 280, 285, ft. nt. 14, (Costs 

of copies of deposition transcripts are not taxable costs). 

(3) Deposition subpoena service fees and mileage for service of same upon Cindy Cadet of 

$40.00 are not appropriate. 

(4) This results in a reduced amount of $1,906.41 

/s/ W. Kelly Lundrigan 

W. Kelly Lundrigan (0059211) 

Rhonda S. Frey (0067343) 

Manley Burke LPA 

225 West Court Street 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45211 

(513) 721-5525 

Fax (513) 721-4268 

email: wkl@manleyburke.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jean-Robert Cadet 

2

Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 81 Filed 12/18/2003 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing Exceptions and Objections are being served via 

electronic notification through the court to all parties entitled to service under Rule 5 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the 18th day of December, 2003. 

_/s/ W. Kelly Lundrigan________ 

W. Kelly Lundrigan 

SERVICE LIST:

R. Gary Winters 

Bernard W. Wharton 

McCaslin, Imbus & McCaslin 

632 Vine Street, Suite 900 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-2442 

3

Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 81 Filed 12/18/2003 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JENNIFER WOODALL, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-202

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Consent Case)

Defendant.

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING THE JOINT STIPULATION FOR REMAND 

(DOC. 16); (2) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE 

FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND 

(3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is presently before the Court on the parties’ 

joint stipulation to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings 

pursuant to the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 16. Based upon the stipulation of 

the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) the ALJ’s non-disability 

finding is found unsupported by substantial evidence, and the parties’ joint request for a remand

(doc. 16) is GRANTED; (2) this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth 

Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and (3) this case is TERMINATED upon 

the Court’s docket. The Clerk is ORDERED to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: December 18, 2018 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
<PAGE>
AMENDMENT NO. 1

THE STANLEY RETIREMENT PLAN


WHEREAS, Stanley Furniture Company (hereinafter referred to as the
"Corporation") established The Stanley Retirement Plan
(hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") amended and restated effective
January 1, 1989, as adopted on April 20, 1995; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation reserved the right in Article X of the Plan to amend
said Plan by action of its Board of Directors;
and,

WHEREAS, the Corporation now desires to amend the Plan in order to make
certain substantive, technical and administrative
changes therein and to cease benefit accruals effective December 31, 1995.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective December 31, 1995, in the
following respects:

1.Section 1.01 of Article I is amended by the addition of Section 1.01 (c) as
follows:

"Effective as of December 31, 1995, all Accrued Benefits under the Plan shall
cease.  Participants shall accrue no additional
            benefits under the Plan after such date."


2.Section 2.01 of Article II is amended by the addition of the following
paragraph at the conclusion thereof:

"Effective as of December 31, 1995, Employees, who are not Participants in
the Plan, shall not be eligible to participate in the
            Plan after such date."

3.Section 3.01 of Article III is amended by the addition of Section 3.01 (d)
as follows:

Cessation of Benefit Accruals - Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective as
of December 31, 1995, all Accrued Benefits under
            the Plan shall cease and participants shall accrue no additional
benefits under the Plan after such date."

4.Section 4.02 (c) of Article IV is amended by the addition of the following
paragraph at the conclusion thereof:

"Commencing January 1, 1996, a Participant who is eligible to retire pursuant
to Sections 3.01, 3.02, 3.03 or 3.04 may elect to
            receive his retirement benefit in the form of a lump sum.



<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment No. I to the
Plan to be executed by its President and
its corporate seal to be affixed by the Assistant Secretary, both duly
authorized, effective as indicated herein, but executed this
15th day of December, 1995.



Attest:  (SEAL)                                      STANLEY FURNITURE
COMPANY




                  By                                                        
 
 R. Gary Armbrister                    Albert L. Prillaman                  
 
 Assistant Secretary Treasurer            President, CEO and                
 
 Chairman of the Board             










MSWORD\AMENDMEN.1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Rossi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amended Annual Report of Garb Oil & Power Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Garb Oil & Power Corporation.








Date: March 7, 2012
By: /s/John RossiJohn Rossi, President and CEO,Financial and Accounting Officer








A signed original of the written statements above required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Garb Oil & Power Corporation and will be retained by Garb Oil & Power Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The forgoing certifications are being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, and they shall not be considered filed as part of such report
..
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that each of the  undersigned,  being directors
and/or  officers  of  General  Electric  Capital  Services,   Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation  (the  "Corporation"),  hereby  constitutes  and appoints  Dennis D.
Dammerman,  James A. Parke,  Joan C. Amble and Nancy E. Barton and each of them,
his true and lawful  attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution
and  resubstitution,  for him and in his  name,  place  and stead in any and all
capacities, to sign one or more Annual Reports for the Corporation's fiscal year
ended December 31, 2001, on Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  or such other form as such  attorney-in-fact  may deem necessary or
desirable, any amendments thereto, and all additional amendments thereto in such
form as they or any one of them  may  approve,  and to file  the  same  with all
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities
and Exchange Commission,  granting unto said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, and
each of them,  full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing  requisite  and necessary to be done to the end that such Annual Report or
Annual  Reports  shall  comply  with the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended, and the applicable Rules and Regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission  adopted or issued pursuant thereto,  as fully and to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person,  hereby ratifying and confirming all
that  said  attorneys-in-fact  and  agents,  or  any of  them  or  their  or his
substitute  or  resubstitute,  may  lawfully  do or cause  to be done by  virtue
hereof.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  each of the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 7th
day of March 2002.



/s/ Dennis D. Dammerman                      /s/ James A. Parke
-------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Dennis D. Dammerman,                         James A. Parke,
Chairman of the Board                        Director, Executive Vice President
(Principal Executive Officer)                and Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial Officer)


                      /s/ Joan C. Amble
                      -------------------------------
                      Joan C. Amble,
                      Vice President and Controller
                      (Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      17,211,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,954,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                   256,117
<INVENTORY>                                  3,620,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,236,327
<PP&E>                                      14,702,527
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,276,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,769,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,062,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       157,861
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,484,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,769,673
<SALES>                                     53,627,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            53,627,516
<CGS>                                       22,236,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,236,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,088,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               120,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,847,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                   538,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,309,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,309,652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,285,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,517,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,156
<INVENTORY>                                  2,670,877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,527,150
<PP&E>                                       3,192,991
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,908,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,301,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,605,657
<BONDS>                                        262,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       123,073
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,310,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,301,928
<SALES>                                      9,695,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,878,258
<CGS>                                        6,040,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,750,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,189
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             73,189
<DISCONTINUED>                             (2,009,347)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,936,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1 - CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Cumberland  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Joseph M.
Williams,  President and Treasurer,  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)
1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  August 14, 2002                              By:  /s/  Joseph M. Williams
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Joseph M. Williams
                                                    President and Treasurer
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 2 of 14 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 3 of 14 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 4 of 14 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 5 of 14 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 6 of 14 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 7 of 14 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 8 of 14 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 9 of 14 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 10 of 14 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 11 of 14 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 12 of 14 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 13 of 14 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 1:18-mj-00278-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 14 of 14 PAGEID #: 14
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50054

Summary Calendar

 

WILBERT VALLIER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RUBIN HARRIS, Medical Doctor,

Bastrop, Texas, ET AL.,

 Defendants,

RUBIN HARRIS, Medical Doctor, Bastrop, Texas;

CALVIN YOUNG, Physician Assistant; GARY BOWLING,

Physician Assistant,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-93-CA-41

- - - - - - - - - -

December 26, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wilbert Vallier, federal prisoner #01465-078, appeals from a

jury verdict in favor of the defendants on his Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388, 397 (1971), claims of deliberate indifference to serious
No. 97-50054 

-2-

medical needs and from a dismissal of his negligence claims under

the Federal Tort Claims Act for lack of subject-matter

jurisdiction. Vallier contends that the district court plainly

erred in instructing the jury on deliberate indifference because

the court failed to instruct the jury that it could render a

verdict in his favor if it found that the defendants were

negligent in administering medical treatment to him. He also

contends that the jury’s verdict as to his claims of deliberate

indifference to serious medical needs was contrary to the

evidence and that he was entitled to relief on his negligence

claims.

Vallier has not demonstrated, as to his argument that the

deliberate-indifference instruction constituted plain error, a

"substantial and ineradicable doubt whether the jury has been

properly guided in its deliberations." Bender v. Brumley, 1 F.3d

271, 276-77 (5th Cir. 1993). This court declines to address

Vallier’s contention that the jury verdict on his claims of

deliberate indifference to serious medical needs was contrary to

the evidence because Vallier has failed to provide to this court

a transcript of his trial. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Powell v.

Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992). 

Vallier has not demonstrated that the district court erred

in dismissing his claims of negligence under the Federal Tort

Claims Act due to his failure to file his federal complaint

within six months of the final denial by the appropriate agency. 
No. 97-50054 

-3-

See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) (West 1997); McCallister v. United States

By United States Dep't of Agric., Farmers Home Admin., 925 F.2d

841, 843 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.