alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### u.s. Department of

Transportation Office of the Secretary Of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave .• S
. E. Washington
. DC 20590



## MAY 302014

The Honorable Tim Johnson United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Johnson: Thank you for your recent letter regarding Great Lakes Aviation's service at Pierre. In the letter, you stated that the Mayor of Pierre contacted you to raise concern with Great Lakes' deteriorating air service and the difficulties it has caused for travelers, businesses and the state and federal employees using Pierre Regional Airport. Enclosed, please find a copy of the letter we sent to Mayor Laurie Gill addressing these issues
. We have been engaged with Great Lakes and I can assure you that we are evaluating the operational problems affecting not only Great Lakes, but other regional carriers as well
. We share your beliefthat safe, affordable, and reliable air service is vital to the economies of rural communities and appreciate your continued efforts in the EAS program. A copy of this letter will be placed in Pierre's docket (Docket DOT-OST-2011-0138) on www.regulations.gov. Sincerely,

Todd M. Homan Director, Office of Aviation Analysis
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LUCAS ALLEN NEWNAM,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 115 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of June, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 26, 2012

p0319 

# Order

March 26, 2012

144157

DONNA SEUDEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 14 4157 COA: 300144 Genesee CC: 09-091550-CL CIENA HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT, INC., a/k/a CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC., WILLOWBROOK ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, WILLOWBROOK MANOR and JAMES NASH, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 18, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46288

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DENNIS CARL BOTHWELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: April 2, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. Benjamin J. Cluff, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of six years, with a minimum period of 

confinement of three years, for driving under the influence of alcohol, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Dennis Carl Bothwell pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol, Idaho 

Code § 18-8004. The district court imposed a unified six-year sentence, with three years 

determinate, and retained jurisdiction. Bothwell appeals, contending that his sentence is 

excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Bothwell’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet as of June 30, 1998,  and  statements of operations  for the twelve months
ended June 30,  1998,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1998        
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                5,594
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       195,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          30,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    231,660
<PP&E>                                               42,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (25,834)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      252,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               884,957
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                          2,744,068
<OTHER-SE>                                       (3,375,791)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        252,874
<SALES>                                               4,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      9,625
<CGS>                                                13,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        13,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    159,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (28,664)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (217,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (217,439)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.01
                                              

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.21


 


Modifications
to Terms of Employment with Dr. Robert I. Rudko


 


On
April 1, 2008, Dr. Robert I. Rudko, a director and Chief Scientific
Officer of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”), transitioned from being a
full-time employee of the Company to being a part-time employee.  Dr. Rudko
currently works approximately 7.75 hours per week and is compensated by the
Company at a rate of $103.10 per hour (which is equal to Dr. Rudko’s
previous annual salary of $214,454, divided by 52 weeks per year, divided by 40
hours per week).  As a result of his
part-time status, Dr. Rudko is not eligible to receive a bonus.  In addition, Dr. Rudko’s annual car
allowance has been reduced to $1,200 per annum.
Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW     Document 136      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW     Document 136      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW     Document 136      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ GARY SIEGEL*

Name: Gary SiegelTitle: Vice President, Finance
 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genta
Incorporated and will be retained by Genta Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 58
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Kenneth Y. Tanji,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                      |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 10, 2008 |  |                      |  |                                                     
|                         |  | /s/ Kenneth Y. Tanji
|                         |  | Name:                |  | Kenneth Y. Tanji                                    
|                         |  | Title:               |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
AVEIS L. BROWN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5919

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed September 14, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahasse e

, for Ap pellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi

, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Walter Mor tgage Company

LLC,



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 13, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00882

- CV

Joseph ZAPATA and Maria Banda,

Appellant s

v.

WALTER MORTGAGE COMPANY LLC, ET AL.,

Appellee s

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 03

- 48880

- CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's request for a 10 day extension to pay the $195.00 filing fee is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to January 17, 2013.

____________________________ _____ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of January, 2014

.

_________________________ __________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 118 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 118

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 30 (legislative day, November 29), 2022

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
 present Congressional Gold Medals to the United States Capitol Police 
        and others who protected the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD 
              MEDALS TO UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE AND OTHERS WHO 
              PROTECTED THE CAPITOL ON JANUARY 6, 2021.

    The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on December 6, 
2022, for a ceremony to present Congressional Gold Medals to the United 
States Capitol Police and others who protected the Capitol on January 
6, 2021. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Kevin F. McCumber,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: October 29, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                     JURISDICTION
------------------                                     ------------
<S>                                                    <C>
J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company                   Colorado
J.D. Edwards World Source Company                      Colorado
J.D. Edwards Holdings Inc.                             Colorado
J.D. Edwards Company Pty. Ltd.                         Australia
J.D. Edwards Australia Pty. Ltd.                       Australia
J.D. Edwards Austria GmbH                              Austria
J.D. Edwards & Company Foreign Sales, Inc.             Barbados
J.D. Edwards Belgium N.V./S.A.                         Belgium
J.D. Edwards Brasil Limitada                           Brazil
J.D. Edwards Canada Ltd.                               Canada
J.D. Edwards France SA                                 France
J.D. Edwards Deutschland GmbH                          Germany
J.D. Edwards (Hong Kong) Limited                       Hong Kong
J.D. Edwards Europe Ltd.                               Ireland
J.D. Edwards Italia S.p.A.                             Italy
J.D. Edwards (Japan) K.K.                              Japan
J.D. Edwards de Mexico y Compania S. en N.C. de C.V.   Mexico
J.D. Edwards New Zealand Ltd.                          New Zealand
J.D. Edwards International B.V.                        Netherlands
J.D. Edwards Netherlands B.V.                          Netherlands
J.D. Edwards (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.                  Singapore
J.D. Edwards S.A. (Proprietary) Limited                South Africa
J.D. Edwards (Korea), Inc.                             South Korea (addition)
J.D. Edwards Espana S.L.                               Spain
J.D. Edwards Nordic A.B.                               Sweden
J.D. Edwards (Schweiz) AG                              Switzerland
J.D. Edwards (Taiwan) Pte. Ltd.                        Taiwan
J.D. Edwards & Company (U.K.) Ltd.                     United Kingdom
J.D. Edwards Nova Scotia Company                       Nova Scotia
J.D. Edwards Numetrix Company                          Nova Scotia
Numetrix, Inc.                                         Connecticut
Numetrix B.V.                                          Netherlands
Numetrix Asia Pte. Ltd.                                Singapore
Numetrix GmbH                                          Switzerland
Numetrix, Ltd.                                         United Kingdom
World Technology Services, Inc.                        Washington
   (J.D. Edwards & Company is a 50% owner)
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the date, time and agenda for a meeting of the National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board. The meeting will be open to the public; however, advance notice of attendance is required.

# DATES:

Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

Meeting will be held via Microsoft Teams.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rachel Karton, Office of Small Business Development Centers, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416;                         *Rachel.newman-karton@sba.gov;*                         202-619-1816.                    

If anyone wishes to be a listening participant or would like to request accommodations, please contact Rachel Karton at the information above.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the SBA announces the meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator for Small Business Development Centers.

## Purpose

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the following issues pertaining to the SBDC Program:
    - SBA|OSBDC Leadership Transition
    - Strategy for Increasing Board Awareness and Understanding of SBDC Program
    - Board Leadership Election

Andrienne Johnson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-00508 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 1 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 2 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 3 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 4 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 5 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 6 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 7 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 8 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 9 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 10 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 11 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 12 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 13 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 14 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 15 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 16 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 17 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 18 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 19 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 20 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 21 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 22 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 23 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 24 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 25 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 26 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 27 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 28 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 29 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 30 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 31 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 32 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 33 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 34 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 35 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 36 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 37 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 38 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 39 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 40 of 41
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 75 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 41 of 41