alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 534 

Designating March 2 through March 8, 2020, as ‘‘Women of the Aviation 

Workforce Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2020 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Mr. MORAN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 2 through March 8, 2020, as ‘‘Women 

of the Aviation Workforce Week’’. 

Whereas the first week of March is internationally known as 

‘‘Women of Aviation Worldwide Week’’; 

Whereas Women of Aviation Worldwide Week was created by 

the Institute for Women Of Aviation Worldwide; 

Whereas, over the last 5 years, the aviation industry has experienced an increase in passenger traffic by an average 

of 6.5 percent per year; 

Whereas the aviation industry is anticipating a significant 

shortage of skilled professionals in the coming years; 

Whereas the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department 

of Labor projected that, in the next 10 years, the overall 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 534 IS 

employment of airline and commercial pilots is expected 

to grow more than 6 percent in the United States; 

Whereas less than 2 percent of the aircraft maintenance technicians in the world and less than 10 percent of all working aeronautical engineers are women; 

Whereas the Federal Aviation Administration reports that 

less than 8 percent of pilots and only 26 percent of air 

traffic controllers in the United States are women; 

Whereas women make up only 24 percent of the employees 

in the aerospace industry; 

Whereas aviation is a science, technology, engineering, and 

math (commonly known as ‘‘STEM’’) focused career 

path; 

Whereas the future of an abundant aviation workforce depends on a robust and diverse pool of candidates; and 

Whereas women such as Amelia Earhart, Cicely Williams, Nicole Malachowski, Bessie Coleman, and Jeannie Leavitt 

have inspired, and will continue to inspire, young women 

to pursue careers in aviation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 2 through March 8, 2020, 

3 as ‘‘Women of the Aviation Workforce Week’’; 

4 (2) celebrates the aviation workforce of the 

5 United States; 

6 (3) encourages educational and training institu7 tions to recruit women to join the aviation work8 force; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 534 IS 

1 (4) encourages employers in the aviation indus2 try to hire a diverse workforce, including women, 

3 veterans, and other underrepresented individuals; 

4 and 

5 (5) commits to— 

6 (A) raising awareness about the gender 

7 gap in the air and space industry; and 

8 (B) taking legislative actions to address 

9 the gender gap in science, technology, engineer10 ing, and math (commonly known as ‘‘STEM’’) 

11 fields. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

TAMEKA D. HINES, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-250

 

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent Case)

Defendant.

ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD 

OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”)

(DOC. 27); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTON FOR EAJA FEES (DOC. 26) AS 

MOOT; AND (3) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $5,000.00 IN EAJA FEES

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint 

stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal 

Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $5,000.00. Doc. 27. Based 

upon the parties’ stipulation in which they present no dispute that all requirements are met for the 

reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties’ joint stipulation (doc. 27);

(2) DENIES Plaintiff’s previously filed motion for EAJA fees (doc. 26) as moot; and (3) 

GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $5,000.00. As no further matters remain pending 

for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: December 17, 2019 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
Equation to calculate weighted mean value:

̅ =

Where

̅ is the weighted mean value of variable x. is the measured value of variable x in cycle i; is the distance traveled in cycle i ; is the weighting factor for the cycle i ;

Assume: Cycle 1 : ARB transient Cycle 2: 55mph Cruise Cycle 3: 65mph Cruise Then for weighted brake energy (E b ): For 55mph and 65mph Cruise cycle we have: = = 0. so

= For weighted traction energy (E t ):

= + +

The calculated ratio is shown in the PPT file.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         3,184,420
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          982,019
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   1,105,930
<MORTGAGE>                                      45,374
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               6,147,331
<CASH>                                       2,244,209
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             987,201
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         747,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,238,252
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              3,023,113
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          2,462,240
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 254,146
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              1,441,226
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,763
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,238,252
<PREMIUMS>                                   3,731,139
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            297,892
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             207,781
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,964,945
<BENEFITS>                                   1,355,867
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,017,661
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         2,895,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (161,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (161,171)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION

I, James Joyce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Aethlon Medical, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005

                                        /S/ JAMES A. JOYCE
                                        -----------------------------
                                        JAMES A. JOYCE
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                        (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
#### John F. WELLS *v.*PARAGON PRINTING CO. et al

5-5342

462 S. W. 2d 471

Opinion delivered February 1, 1971

*R. Eugene Bailey,*for appellant.

*Wright, Lindsey ir Jennings,*for appellees.

Oliver M. Clegg, Special Chief Justice.

This is a taxpayer’s suit brought by appellant, on his own behalf and for all others similarly situated, to cancel a contract made by the State with the appellee, Paragon Printing *951Company, for the printing of the decisions of this Court during 1968 and 1969. The other appellees are State officials having statutory duties with respect to State contracts.

The Chancellor, after a trial on the issues, dismissed appellant’s complaint and he appeals.

Appellant contends here, as in the lower court, that the contract contains provisions violative of statutory authority (Ark. Stats. § 22-223) and is “indefinite and ambiguous” and, therefore, void.

We cannot reach a consideration of the merits because appellant has failed to comply with Rule 9 (d) of this Court. Not only is the abstract of testimony inadequate, none of the documentary evidence is abstracted, including the contract alleged to be void as containing illegal provisions and being “indefinite and ambiguous.”

In these circumstances, it would be impossible for the members of the Court to decide the questions argued without individually examining the transcript. The practical reasons which require compliance with Rule 9 (d) have been stated many times, and make further discussion here superfluous. *Vire*v. *Vire,*236 Ark. 740, 368 S. W. 2d 265.

Affirmed.

William I. Prewett and John Stroud, Special Justices, join in this opinion.

Harris, C. J., and Fogleman and Byrd, JJ., not participating.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.1 

                        DESTRON FEARING CORPORATION

        Calculation of Basic And Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common and
                          Common Equivalent Share 
                 (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                            Quarter Ended December 31,
                                            -------------------------
                                                1997         1996
                                                ----         ----
<S>                                         <C>          <C>
Net income (loss)                              $  (412)     $    81
                                               -------      -------
                                               -------      -------

Weighted average number of common 
  and common equivalent shares 
  outstanding:

     Weighted average number of 
     common shares outstanding                  13,294       11,644 

     Dilutive effect of stock options and 
     warrants after application of the 
     treasury stock method                          --          302 
                                               -------      -------


                                                13,294       11,946 
                                               -------      -------
                                               -------      -------

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
   common and common equivalent share          $ (0.03)     $  0.01 
                                               -------      -------
                                               -------      -------

</TABLE>


                                    -14-
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

I, Alberto R. Santa Ines, Chief Financial Officer of Abaxis, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the   Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the   requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15   U.S.C. 78m); and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report   fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and   results of operations of the Registrant.                                                                                                  |

Dated: November 9, 2006

|   | By:    | /s/ Alberto R. Santa Ines                               |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                         |
|   |   | Alberto R. Santa Ines                                   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President   of Finance |
EXHIBIT QQ

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 178-17 Filed: 01/25/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 9771
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 178-17 Filed: 01/25/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 9772
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION

I, James W. Dorst, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Aethlon Medical, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 11, 2006
                                             /s/ James W. Dorst
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             James W. Dorst
                                             Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,372
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           622
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,724)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,159
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   791
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
May 27, 2015

Secretary John F. Kerry

US Department of State

2201 C Street, NW

Washington, DC 20520

Secretary Anthony Foxx

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, 9th Floor

Washington, DC 20590

Secretary Penny S. Pritzker

Department of Commerce

1401 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20230 

Re: Comment dockets DOS–2015–0016, DOT–OST–2015–0082 and DOC-2015-0001-0001

Dear Secretary Kerry, Secretary Foxx, and Secretary Pritzker:

I am writing you today to encourage you to maintain the United States’ current Open Skies agreements with Qatar 

and the UAE in order to continue promoting travel and tourism with the U.S. As the President and CEO of the Asian 

American Hotel Owners Association (AAHOA), which represents the voice of the hospitality industry and represents 

more than 578,000 full and part-time employees, 14,000 members, 20,000 hotels, $128 billion in property value, 

and $9.4 billion in payroll, I am committed to promoting the economic interests of our members who rely on the 

travel and tourism industry to be successful. 

AAHOA was concerned to learn that U.S. airline carriers are trying to reopen our current Open Skies agreements. Any 

changes to our current agreements could prevent Gulf carriers from establishing service with important U.S. airports. 

Gulf carriers currently service markets like India, the Middle East, and Southern Africa which are largely ignored by 

U.S. carriers. Any movement to prohibit Gulf carriers from establishing service in U.S. airports could threaten our 

economic and cultural ties with those regions, and ultimately threaten our members’ livelihood.

As you know, in recent years Gulf carriers have made a significant impact on our economy by bringing a total of 

140,000 visitors to the United States who spent $1 billion during their visits in 2014. The hospitality industry 

benefited greatly from their service, and that is why it is so important for you to maintain our current Open Skies 

agreements so our members can continue to benefit from their service. 

Thank you for taking the time to consider this important request, and I hope you will do everything you can to 

maintain our current Open Skies agreements. I appreciate everything you are doing to promote and protect the 

interests of the hospitality industry.

Sincerely,

Chip Rogers

President & CEO

Asian American Hotel Owners Association
#### State *v.*Susan Epperson and N. H. Blanchard

5-4127

416 S. W. 2nd 322

Opinion delivered June 5, 1967

[Rehearing denied July 26, 1967.]

*Bruce Bennett,*Attorney General; *Fletcher Jackson,*Asst. Atty. General, for appellant.

*Warren & Bullion,*for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the principal issue, that of constitutionality, the court holds that Initiated Measure No. 1 of 1928, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 80-1627 and § 80-1628 (Repl. 1960), is a valid exercise of the state’s power to specify the curriculum in its public schools. The court expresses no opinion on the question whether the Act prohibits any explanation of the theory of evolution or merely prohibits teaching that the theory is true; the answer not being necessary to a decision in the case, and the issue not having been raised.

The decree is reversed and the cause dismissed.

Ward, J., concurs. BrowN, J., dissents.

Paul Ward, Justice,

concurring. I agree with the first sentence in the majority opinion.

To my mind, the rest of the opinion beclouds the clear announcement made in the first sentence.