alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF CHEMTRAK
INCORPORATED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,069,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  320,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    867,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,000
<PP&E>                                       2,499,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,980,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,692,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,545,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,980,000
<SALES>                                        608,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,441,000
<CGS>                                          704,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  704,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,076,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,295,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,295,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,295,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aethlon Medical, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James B. Frakes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. Based on my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.








Dated: February 17, 2011
/s/ JAMES B. FRAKESJames B. FrakesChief Financial OfficerAethlon Medical, Inc.
Exhibit 10.2



December 6, 2010



Steve Filton

Senior Vice President & CFO

UHS of Delaware, Inc.

367 South Gulph Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406



Dear Steve;



The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income
Trust (UHT), at their December 2, 2010 meeting, authorized the renewal of the current Advisory Agreement between UHT and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (Agreement) upon the same terms and conditions.



This letter constitutes UHTs offer to renew the
Agreement, through December 31, 2011, upon such terms and conditions. Please acknowledge UHS of Delawares acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to me. Thank you.



Sincerely,



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cheryl K. Ramagano                                    
|Cheryl K. Ramagano
Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary



Agreed and Accepted:UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.By:

/s/ Steve FiltonSteve Filton Senior Vice
President and CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              98,780
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       8,151,874
<ALLOWANCES>                                        78,484
<INVENTORY>                                         612,825
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    9,953,746
<PP&E>                                              68,459,843
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19,153,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      59,260,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19,524,589
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            18,527
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                          9,689,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        59,260,488
<SALES>                                             53,054,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    53,054,042
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    49,395,576
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    37,901
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,516,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     1,104,564
<INCOME-TAX>                                        411,561
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 693,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        693,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.38
        

</TABLE>
H. J. Res. 27 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-one 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of the Board 

of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 

the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 

in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason 

of the expiration of the term of David M. Rubenstein of Maryland 

on May 7, 2021, is filled by the appointment of Barbara M. Barrett 

of Arizona. The appointment is for a term of 1,912 days, beginning 

on May 8, 2021, or the date of the enactment of this joint resolution, 

whichever occurs later. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4487 

To require the approval of a majority of a public company’s shareholders 

for any expenditure by that company to influence public opinion on 

matters not related to the company’s products or services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2010 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the approval of a majority of a public company’s 

shareholders for any expenditure by that company to 

influence public opinion on matters not related to the 

company’s products or services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End the Hijacking of 

5 Shareholder Funds Act’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4487 IH

1 SEC. 2. SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL FOR CERTAIN EXPENDI2 TURES. 

3 Any expenditure by a public company to influence 

4 public opinion on matters not related to the company’s 

5 products or services that has not been approved by a ma6 jority of the votes cast by shareholders to approve or dis7 approve such expenditure shall be considered a breach of 

8 a fiduciary duty of the officers and directors who author9 ized such an expenditure. The officers and directors who 

10 authorize such an expenditure without first obtaining such 

11 approval of shareholders shall be jointly and severally lia12 ble in any action brought in any court of competent juris13 diction to any shareholder or class of shareholders for the 

14 amount of such expenditure. 

15 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

16 As used in this Act— 

17 (1) the term ‘‘public company’’ means any 

18 issuer that is required to submit periodical or other 

19 reports under section 13 of the Securities Exchange 

20 Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

21 (2) the term ‘‘shareholder’’ means any person 

22 who owns or holds a share of stock in a public com23 pany. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION

I, James Joyce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Aethlon Medical, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2006

                                        /S/ JAMES A. JOYCE
                                        -----------------------------
                                        JAMES A. JOYCE
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                        (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)


                                       19
Exhibit 32

# Certification Pursuant
to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report of Gibraltar Packaging Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer
and the Vice President Finance (chief financial officer), respectively, of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/   Walter E. Rose        |  | /s/   Brett E. Moller  | 
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 
|                            |  |                        | 
|WALTER E. ROSE              |  | BRETT E. MOLLER        | 
|Chairman of the Board       |  | Vice President Finance | 
|and Chief Executive Officer | 

Dated:   May 13, 2004

This certification is made
solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge
standard contained in that statute, and not for any other purpose.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1573

BRUCE BENNETT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HFTA FIRST FINANCIAL; BAY VIEW BANK; MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, as trustee for Securitization Series 1977-3 Agreement dated 6/12/97, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (2:04-cv-23129-CWH; BK-04-09737-WB) Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 2, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Bennett, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Weston Adams, III, MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bruce Bennett, Sr., appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13 petition with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bennett v. HFTA First Fin. , Nos. 2:04-cv23129-CWH; BK-04-09737-WB (D.S.C. May 2, 2006). We grant Bennett’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Peter Austin George AFENTAKIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5004

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 99
                         REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                               STOKES & HINDS, LLC

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Neffs Bancorp, Inc.
Neffs, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition
of Neffs Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 1999. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in consolidated financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Neffs Bancorp, Inc
and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1999 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/  Stokes & Hinds, LLC
------------------------
     Stokes & Hinds, LLC

January 7, 2000
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00963-CV

Style:

Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., LifeChek Rosenberg GP, Inc., 

LifeChek, Inc., and Bruce V. Gingrich

v State of Texas

Date motion filed*: March 18, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record

Party filing motion: Court reporter

Document to be filed: Reporter’s record

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 17, 2013

Number of prior extensions: 3 Current Due date: March 19, 2014

Date Requested: April 19, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) 

The record was originally due on December 17, 2013. We have granted three

extensions for filing the record and have previously stated that no further 

extensions would be granted. Accordingly, we deny the motion. If the record is

not filed within 14 days of the date of this order, we may require the court

reporter to appear and show cause why the record has not been filed.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

  

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 20, 2014
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 429 DUANE BURCHILL ,

Petitioner and Appellant. v. STATE OF MONTANA ,

Respondent and Appellee .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including June 2 6 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 18 2023

05/18/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0429
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Excel Realty Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 33-84982) of
our report dated February 5, 1996 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of Excel Realty Trust, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 1995, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

San Diego, California
March 7, 1996
#### James Vincent and wife v. Allendar S. Moore.

*Foreclosure*— Idem *for taxes paid.*

Money paid by tbe holder of a mortgage to redeem the premises from a. tax-sale does not constitute a lien apart from the mortgage, but is discharged when the mortgage is satisfied; and whether the amount paid is or is not included in the sum for which the mortgage is foreclosed, there can be no subsequent or separate proceeding against the mortgager to enforce its payment.

Whatever can be claimed by virtue of a mortgage must be claimed in the foreclosure proceedings; the demand cannot be split and made a basis for separate suits.

Appeal from St. Clair. (Stevens, J.)

Oct. 24.

Oct. 24.

Bill to enforce lien. Complainants appeal.

Affirmed.

*Julia/n G. DieMnson*for complainants.

Where a mortgage needs to be kept alive to protect the mortgagee’s rights, equity will keep it alive as against the mortgager : *Gorm.*
      *619
      *Mut. L. Ins. Go. v. Bulte*15 Mich. 113 (and sec brief of defendant in error in that case, and cases cited, p. 116); *Jackson v. Evans*44 Mich. 510; *French v. JDeBow*38 Midi. 708 ; *Powers v. Golden Lwnber Go.*43 Mich. 468 ; payment of a tax to protect the mortgagee’s interest in the-land, is such a charge upon the land as ft redemption money paid to take up a prior mortgage: 2 Ban. Oh. Pr. 1245 ; 2 Jones on Mortgages §§ 1137 — 1683.

*Atkinson <& Stevenson*for defendant.

A mortgage and all rights under it are exhausted by the foreclosure sale : *Walton v. Hollywood*47 Mich. 385.

Cooley, J.

The bill in this case appears to be filed to-enforce the payment of a sum of money which complainants paid to redeem from a tax sale certain lands belonging to defendant, and upon which complainants, at the time of redemption, held a mortgage. The redemption, it is assumed, was made for the protection of the mortgage ; but complainants went on after wards'and foreclosed the mortgage under the power of sale, taking no notice of what they had paid for taxes and making no claim for the amount. The land was sold in the foreclosure proceedings, and bid in for the amount of the mortgage debt, and defendant redeemed from that sale. This suit was then instituted. *We*think there is no foundation for it. What complainants were compelled to pay for the protection of their mortgage did not constitute a separate and independent lien on the land; it could become a hen only in connection with and because of the mortgage, and could not exist independent of it. When therefore complainants took proceedings which resulted in a satisfaction of the mortgage, any lien which may have existed before for the taxes paid was necessarily discharged, whether the amount paid was claimed in those proceedings or not. All that complainants could claim by virtue of the mortgage they were bound to claim in those proceedings, and they could not at pleasure split up their demand and make the parts the subjects of separate suits-.

*620The decree must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.