alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (475)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,413
<PP&E>                                          13,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,165)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,904
<SALES>                                         16,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,795
<CGS>                                           14,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (76)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   101
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    290
<INCOME-TAX>                                       108
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

John P. McLaughlin, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Christine R. Larson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of PDL BioPharma, Inc. (the Registrant), each hereby certifies in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on his or her knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be provided to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: November 6, 2009



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/    John P. McLaughlin                 
|John P. McLaughlin                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer     
|(Principal Executive Officer)             
|                                          
|/s/    Christine R. Larson                
|Christine R. Larson                       
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Case 1:01-cv-00125-SSB-TSH Document 157 Filed 02/24/2005 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2523** 

NANNETTE F. BUCKNER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JACOB LEW, Secretary, Department of the Treasury , Defendant

– Appellee,

and

TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, Secretary, Department of the Treasury; MARIAM G. GARVEY, Department of the Treasury; JACQUELINE ANN BERRIEN; ROBERT L. HUNT, Area Director, South Atlantic Area, Collections Operations,

Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:13

- cv
- 00199

- FL )

Submitted : A pril 19 , 2016 Decided: September 2, 2016

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Nannette F. Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Nannette F. Buckner appeals the district court ’ s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s
recommendation, and granting Defendant’s motion for summary
judgment i n Buckner’s employment discrimination action. Buckner also appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Buckner v. Lew , No. 5:13

- cv
- 00199

- FL
(E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2015 & Nov. 2, 2015) . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1

THE  FOLLOWING  CERTIFICATION  ACCOMPANIES  THE ISSUER'S  ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM
10-KSB/A AND IS NOT FILED, AS PROVIDED IN SEC RELEASE NOS. 33-8212, 34-47551 AND
IC-25967, DATED MARCH 21, 2003.

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  BrandPartners  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB/A for the year ended  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                      By:  /s/  Edward T. Stolarski
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Edward T. Stolarski
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                                          April 30, 2003

A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE ISSUER AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE ISSUER AND  FURNISHED  TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18
 
October 7, 1997
 
Retirement Care Associates, Inc.
6000 Lake Forrest Drive, Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia 30328
 
Gentlemen:
 
     We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your
Form 10-K/A filing for the year ended June 30, 1996, pursuant to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K.
 
   
     We have read management's justification for the change of method of
accounting for facility supplies inventories from expensing when purchased to
capitalizing (using the cost basis) and expensing as used, contained in the
Company's Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 1996. Based on our reading of
the data and discussions with Company officials about the business judgment and
business planning factors relating to the change, we believe management's
justification to be reasonable. Accordingly, in reliance on management's
determination as regards elements of business judgment and business planning, we
concur that the newly adopted accounting principle described above is preferable
in the Company's circumstances to the method previously applied.
    
 
   
                                          /s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
    
 
                                            -------------------------
   
                                                Cherry, Bekaert &
                                                  Holland, L.L.P.
    
 
Greensboro, North Carolina
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

1/31/2019

 Southern District of Ohio

Melissa Hollingsworth

3:18-cv-195

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §

405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' stipulation; case is

terminated on the dcoket of this Court

✔ Thomas M. Rose

Remand
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 27 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 27

Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2021

Ms. Matsui (for herself and Ms. Roybal-Allard) submitted the following 
    joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of David M. Rubenstein of Maryland on May 7, 2021, is filled by 
the appointment of Barbara M. Barrett of Arizona. The appointment is 
for a term of 1,912 days, beginning on May 8, 2021, or the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs later.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Garb Oil & Power Corporation, and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John C. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




Date: 10/13/2006                                By: /s/ John C. Brewer
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   John C. Brewer
                                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, James W Dorst, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Aethlon Medical, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006

                              /S/ JAMES W. DORST
                              ------------------------------
                              JAMES W. DORST
                              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              (PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER)
#### M. D. THOMPSON & SON Company et al *v.*Robert L. McCUAN

73-188

502 S.W. 2d 93

Opinion delivered December 17, 1973

*Riddick Riffel,*for appellants.

*Hodges, Hodges if Hodges,*by: *David Hodges,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarded total disability benefits to ap-pellee Robert L. McCuan. The circuit *court*affirmed the order of the Commission and appellants, M. D. Thompson and Son Company, et al, appeal contending that there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s findings.

It is not disputed that Mr. McCuan was injured in the course of his employment nor that he has suffered some disability. Appellant’s real contention seems to be that if Mr. McCuan is totally disabled, the greater part thereof is due to his age instead of his injury.

The record shows that Mr. McCuan at the time of injury was drawing Social Security and that he attempted to keep his earnings within the prescribed limits for drawing the maximum available benefits. He was injured when a tree fell on him. One medical doctor placed his permanent functional disability at 20%, another at 33 1/3%. One of the doctors testified that when Mr. Mc-Cuan’s age, educational background and spinal fracture *763were msidered, one would not reasonably expect Mr. McCuan to go back to the work he was doing in a regular and unrestricted capacity at any time in the future.

Appellee testified that he was 68 years of age. He had a little schooling when he was a boy — maybe the third grade. He farmed with mules until 1949 and then with a one row tractor until '63. His work outside of his own farming or as a farm hand consisted of manual labor such as lcjging. Prior to the injury he had done any kind of manual labor he wanted to do. After the injury he was unable to help the wife with the house work. He could not walk a quarter of a mile without stopping to rest.

Other witnesses corroborated Mr. McCuan’s testimony that he was an able-bodied laborer before the injury and unable to do manual labor thereafter.

Mr. Leon Underwood with the Arkansas Rehabilitation Services testified that rehabilitation could provide no beneficial services to Mr. McCuan in view of his age and education.

Thus, from the foregoing, one can readily observe that there was ample evidence to show that Mr. McCuan was an able-bodied, manual worker prior to his injury and that thereafter he was unable to perform any remunerative services. As pointed out in *Furlong*v. *Northwestern Casket Co.,*190 Minn. 552, 252 N.W. 656 (1934), the fact that an employee is of failing physical powers and will probably be incapacitated for work in a few years as a result of such weakness does not bar the employee from Workmen’s Compensation benefits if his incapacity to work is the result of his injuries. We cannot here say that there is no substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the injury created the disability. See also *Meadowlake Nursing Home*v. *Sullivan,*253 Ark. 403, 486 S.W. 2d 82 (1972).

Affirmed.

Harris, C.J., not participating.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metretek Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, W. Phillip Marcum, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



                                       /s/  W. Phillip Marcum
                                       ------------------------------------


                                       W. Phillip Marcum
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       November 12, 2002
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 4 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a President 

pro tempore. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election 

of a President pro tempore. 

1 Resolved, That the President of the United States be 

2 notified of the election of the Honorable Chuck Grassley 

3 as President of the Senate pro tempore. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 23, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-01336-CV VELETTA COLEMAN, Appellant V. MEGAN FINLEY-BENTON, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-11963 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Jus tice Molberg, and Justice Nowell Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant appeals from the trial court’s May 30, 2019 judgment. We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal as it appears the notice of a ppeal is untimely. We instructed the parties to file letter briefs addr essing the jurisdictional iss ue. When a timely post-judgment motion extending the appellate time table is filed, a notice of appeal is due 90 days or, with an extension motion, 105 days af ter the date the judgment is signed.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1(a); 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, thi s Court lacks jurisdiction. See id . 25.1(b). The trial court signed the judgm ent on May 30, 2019. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial on June 28, 2019. Acco rdingly, the no tice of appeal was due on August 28, 2019 or,–2– with an extension motion, September 12, 2019. See id . 26.1(a); 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 31, 2019. Although appellant filed a letter brief, nothing in her brief d emonstrates our jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

191336F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
VELETTA COLEMAN, Appellant
No. 05-19-01336-CV V. MEGAN FINLEY-BENTON, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-11963. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Now ell participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee MEGAN FINLEY-BENTON recover her costs of this appeal from appellant VELETTA COLEMAN.
Judgment entered December 23, 2019