alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A0 95 9 . W ALTER THOMAS J ARRELL v . THE STATE.

Co u ns el fo r Ap p el l an t i n t h e ab o v e-s t y led cas e, p urs u an t t o Co u rt Ru l e 4 1 (g )
(2 ), h as fi l ed a M o t io n To W it h d raw Ap p eal

. Co u rt Ru le 4 1 (g ) (2 ) p ro v id es as fo l l o ws :

In a cri m i n al c a s e, u nl es s t h e St at e i s t h e ap p el l an t

, t he m o t i o n sh al l
i n cl u d e an affi dav i t fro m t h e d efen d an t ag reei n g t o t h e wi t h d rawal o f th e
ap p eal

. Sh ou l d t h e defen d an t refu s e t o p ro v i d e an affi d a v i t

, co u n s el

s h al l ad v is e t he Co u rt o f t h at fact an d s t at e i n th e m o t i o n t h e g ro u n d s fo r wi t h drawi n g t h e ap p eal

.

Co u ns el s t a t e s i n t h e m o t i o n t h e defen d an t h as been no t i fi ed an d as k ed to

ex ecu t e an affi d av i t. As o f t h e fi l i n g o f t h e m o t i o n , t he defen d an t h as n o t res p o n d ed

. Sai d M o t io n i s h ereb y

GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. February 12, 2019

02/12/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Kyle M. Parks,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:18-cv-924

Special Agent Ryan

Scheiderer,

Defendant.

ORDER

This is a civil rights action brought by Kyle M. Parks, a

federal inmate, against Special Agent Ryan Scheiderer. On August

21, 2018, the magistrate judge issued an order and notice of

deficiency, directing plaintiff to pay the requisite filing fee or

an application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days. 

Plaintiff failed to respond to this notice. On September 27, 2018,

the magistrate judge issued a second order and notice of deficiency

directing plaintiff to submit the requisite filing fee or an

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty

days. This notice advised plaintiff that failure to comply with

the order would result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff failed to respond to

this order.

This matter is before the court for consideration of the

November 6, 2018, report and recommendation of the magistrate

judge, which recommended that plaintiff’s claims be dismissed for

failure to prosecute. The report specifically advised plaintiff

that objections to the report and recommendation were due within

fourteen days, and that the failure to object to the report and

recommendation “will result in a waiver of the right to de novo
review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the

judgment of the District Court.” Doc. 5, p. 2. The time period

for filing objections to the report and recommendation has expired,

and no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, the court adopts the report and recommendation

(Doc. 5). This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure

to prosecute.

Date: November 28, 2018 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge 

2
IV 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 71 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Congress should issue a subpoena 

to Dr. Anthony Fauci and reduce the salary of the Director of the 

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Chief Medical 

Advisor to the President. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2022 

Mr. GOSAR submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Congress should issue 

a subpoena to Dr. Anthony Fauci and reduce the salary 

of the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and 

Infectious Diseases and Chief Medical Advisor to the 

President. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that— 

3 (1) Congress should issue a subpoena to Dr. 

4 Anthony Fauci with the intent of investigating— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 71 IH 

1 (A) the extent of any corrupt activities to 

2 which he may be a party with respect to the 

3 COVID–19 pandemic; and 

4 (B) the deception, misinformation, and nu5 merous lies reported to Congress and the Amer6 ican People throughout the COVID–19 pan7 demic; and 

8 (2) the Speaker of the House of Representa9 tives should reinstate the Holman Rule and provide 

10 expeditious consideration of legislation that reduces 

11 the salary of the Director of the National Institute 

12 of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Chief Medical 

13 Advisor to the President (Dr. Anthony Fauci) to 

14 $0.00. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ PAUL G. GABOSPaul G. Gabos Chief Financial Officer


August 5, 2009
Amendment No. 9 to the Incentive Savings Plan


 Exhibit 4.3.10 
 NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. 
 INCENTIVE SAVINGS PLAN 
 WHEREAS, The
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (the “Corporation”) sponsors The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Incentive Savings Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation has the authority under Article XIV to amend the Plan, and the Corporation wishes to amend the Plan as set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	A new Section 5.2 is added to the Plan to provide in its entirety as follows: 

  

	 	5.2	Riggs Plan Merger – Riggs Matching Contributions 

 Upon the effective date of the contemplated merger of the Riggs National Corporation 401(k) Plan (the “Riggs Plan”) into the Plan, employer matching contributions made by Riggs National Corporation or its subsidiaries on behalf of
former employees of Riggs National Corporation or its subsidiaries (“former Riggs participants”) shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting provisions of the Riggs Plan, taking into account such former employees’ service
with an Employer following the merger of Riggs National Corporation and the Corporation; provided, however, that any employer matching contributions held under the Plan which were made by Riggs National Corporation or its subsidiaries on
behalf of former Riggs participants shall, in the case of any former Riggs participants whose employment is terminated by an Employer solely due to job elimination due to work restructuring during the period beginning on the effective date of the
merger of Riggs National Corporation and the Corporation and ending on June 30, 2006, fully vest upon such termination of employment. 
 Except as
herein amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 This Tenth Amendment to The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Incentive Savings Plan
shall become effective as of the date on which the contemplated merger of the Corporation and Riggs National Corporation shall become effective. The Corporation intends that this Tenth Amendment shall not become effective unless and until the merger
of the Corporation and Riggs national Corporation shall be effective. 
 Executed and adopted this 13
th day of May 2005 by The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. through its duly authorized officer. 
  

	
	 /s/ William E. Rosner

	William E. Rosner
	Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Exhibit 10.55


 


AMENDMENT #2 TO $600,000 PROMISSORY NOTE
DATED OCTOBER 15, 2007 BETWEEN PROUROCARE MEDICAL, INC. (“BORROWER”) AND
THE PHILLIPS W. SMITH FAMILY TRUST (“LENDER”)


 


This
Amendment #2 to Promissory Note dated October 15, 2007 between ProUroCare
Medical, Inc. (“Borrower”) and Phillips W. Smith (“Lender”) (the “Note”)
is made to change the interest and payment terms of the Note.


 


Note Amendments


 


Section 3. E.4(a) is hereby deleted and
replaced by the following:


 


                (a) Lifetime.  The Interest Rate will never be less than
6.000 percent.


 


Section 5, “PAYMENT” is hereby deleted
and replaced by the following:


 


5.                                      PAYMENT.  We agree to repay this Note and any accrued
but unpaid interest thereon on March 28, 2010.


 


Payments made on this Note will be applied first to interest that is
due then to principal that is due, and finally to any charges that we owe other
than principal and interest.  If you and
we agree to a different application of payments, we will describe our agreement
on this Note.  You may change how
payments are applied in your sole discretion without notice to us.  The actual amount of our final payment will
depend on our payment record.


 


 


EXECUTED this 19th day of March, 2009.


 




	
  ProUroCare Medical Inc.

  	
   

  	
  Phillips W. Smith Family Trust

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Richard C. Carlson

  	
   

  	
  /s/Phillps
  W. Smith

  
	
  Richard C. Carlson

  	
   

  	
  Phillips W. Smith

  
	
  CEO

  	
   

  	
  Trustee
UNITED STATES DISRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

RAYMOND WELCH,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 2:18-cy-186

v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
ACTING COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

ORDER

The parties have filed a Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the
Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), which is hereby GRANTED. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff is
awarded the sum of $3,950.00. The award of attorney fees satisfies all of Plaintiff's claims for
fees and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The Court orders that the fee award is payable to
Plaintiff. If counsel for the parties can verify that Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to
offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the award be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney pursuant
to the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff and counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2-46-2014 --

DATE EDM . SARGUS, JR.
CHIEF TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
----

| If      to Company:    If      to Consultant: | P.A.M.      Transportation Services, Inc297      West Henri Detonti Boulevard Tontitown, AR 72770Attn:      Robert Weaver, CEOFAX:      (479) 361-5473 Manuel      J. Moroun12225      Stephens RoadWarren,      MI 48089FAX:      (586) 759-2220 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   | COMPANY                              |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
| By:    | /s/      Robert W. Weaver            |
|   |                                 |
|   | CONSULTANT                           |
|   | /s/      Manuel J. Moroun            |
|   | Manuel      J. Moroun, an individual |
|   |                                 |
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James W. Dorst, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. Such quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: August 11, 2006.

By: /s/ James W. Dorst
    -----------------------
    James W. Dorst
    Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                State/Country of
Name                                           Incorporation       % Ownership
------------------------------------------    ----------------   ---------------
<S>                                           <C>                <C>

Flanders/CSC Corporation                      North Carolina        100.00% 

Air Seal Filter Housings, Inc.                Texas                 100.00% 

Precisionaire, Inc.                           Florida               100.00% 

Flanders International Pte, Ltd.              Singapore             100.00% 

Flanders Filters, Inc.                        North Carolina         98.86% 

Airseal West, Inc.                            Utah                   80.00% 

Flanders Airia Technologies, Inc.             North Carolina        100.00% 

GFI, Inc.                                     Utah                  100.00% 

Sierra Ridge Filtration, Inc.                 Utah                  100.00% 

Flanders/Precisionaire Corp.                  North Carolina        100.00% 

Flanders Realty Corp.                         North Carolina        100.00% 

Flanders Airpure Products Company, LLC        North Carolina        100.00%(1) 

Eco-Air Products, Inc.                        California             96.70%

Industrias Seco de Tijuana, S.A. de C.V.      Mexico                100.00%(3)
---------------------
<FN>

(1) 63% owned by Flanders Filters, Inc., 37% by the Company.
(2) Owned by Flanders Airia Technologies, Inc.
(3) .2% owned by the Company, 99.8% owned by Eco-Air Products, Inc.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 76 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 76 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 76 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 76 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:01-cv-00131-TSH Document 76 Filed 10/15/2003 Page 5 of 5
Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN (COLUMBUS) DIVISION

Brian Garrett, et al., individually and

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs. Civil Case 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD

The Ohio State University, 

Defendant.

CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Michael Schyck, John Antognoli, Roger Beedon, Dr. Mark 

Chrystal, Joel Davis, Edward Gonzales, Kent Kilgore, Adam Plouse, Daniel Ritchie, and John 

Does 1-2, 4-6, 8, 10-15, 17, 19, 21-25, 27, 29-33, 35-46, 48, 50-51, 53, 56-59, 61, 62, 64, 69, 75, 

77, 85-86, and 88-91, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“Class 

Plaintiffs”), in accord with Fed. R. App. P. 3 and 4(a)(1)(A) and Form 6CA-3, hereby appeal to 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit from:

(1) Opinion and Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Recuse (Doc. 196); 

(2) Opinion and Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 197); and 

(3) Final Judgment (Doc. 198);

all entered on September 22, 2021, in the above-captioned case. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ Simina Vourlis

Simina Vourlis

(Trial Attorney) #0046689

The Law Office of Simina Vourlis

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 200 Filed: 10/20/21 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 1522
Page 2

856 Pullman Way 

Columbus, OH 43212 

(614) 487-5900 

(614) 487-5901 fax 

svourlis@vourlislaw.com

Rex A. Sharp

Ryan C. Hudson

Larkin Walsh

Sarah T. Bradshaw

SHARP LAW, LLP

4820 W. 75th Street

Prairie Village, KS 66208

(913) 901-0505

(913) 901-0419 fax

rsharp@midwest-law.com

rhudson@midwest-law.com

lwalsh@midwest-law.com

sbradshaw@midwest-law.com

Robert Allard

CORSIGLIA, MCMAHON AND ALLARD, LLP

96 North Third Street, Suite 620

San Jose, CA 95112

(408) 289-1417

(408) 289-8127 fax

rallard@cmalaw.net

Stephen Estey

ESTEY & BOMBERGER LLP 

2869 India Street

San Diego, CA 92103 

619-295-0035

619-295-0172 fax

steve@estey-bomberger.com

Daniel R. Karon (#0069304) 

KARON LLC 

700 W. St. Clair Ave., Suite 200 

Cleveland, OH 44113 

Tel.: 216.622.1851 

dkaron@karonllc.com 

Joseph Sauder

SAUDER SCHELKOPF LLC

555 Lancaster Avenue

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 200 Filed: 10/20/21 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 1523
Page 3

Berwyn, PA 19312

(610) 200-0580

(610) 421-1326

jgs@sstriallawyers.com

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

It is hereby certified that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was filed and 

served, via the Court’s CM/ECF system on October 20, 2021, on all counsel of record. Further 

certify that a true and correct copy was sent, UPS Next Day Air, to the Clerk of the Court, United 

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 540 Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse

100 E. Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-3988. 

By: /s/ Simina Vourlis_________

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 200 Filed: 10/20/21 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 1524
Unsealing

Kreutzer, Terah (USAOHS) to:

Magistrate Judge Bowman 

(Kevin_Moser@ohsd.uscourts.

gov)

07/08/2019 09:32 AM

From: "Kreutzer, Terah (USAOHS)" <Terah.Kreutzer@usdoj.gov>

To: "Magistrate Judge Bowman (Kevin_Moser@ohsd.uscourts.gov)" 

<Kevin_Moser@ohsd.uscourts.gov>, 

Kevin,

The following case can be unsealed:

1:18‐MJ‐403

Thank you.

Terah N. Kreutzer

Paralegal Specialist

U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Ohio

221 E. Fourth Street, Suite 400

Cincinnati, OH 45202

(513) 684‐7103

Case: 1:18-mj-00403-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/08/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 18
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 109-5 Filed 08/03/2005 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 109-5 Filed 08/03/2005 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 109-5 Filed 08/03/2005 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 109-5 Filed 08/03/2005 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 109-5 Filed 08/03/2005 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 109-5 Filed 08/03/2005 Page 6 of 6
885 Greenville Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45246 

tel 513 772 1045/fax 513 772 7991 

email babel2@fuse.net F. Bruce Abel 

Fax

To: Gaynell Gallagher, Esq. From: F. Bruce Abel 

Fax: 314 421 0239 Pages: 11 including this cover page

Phone: 314 622 0663 Date: 10/23/2001 

Re: Cynthia K. Payne CC: 

1. McKinney v. New Process Geardivision (NDNY) – 10 pp.

2. Have not shep. Since April, 2001 

3. Although holding is adverse to Plaintiff it is clear is Plaintiff spells it all out while still an employee, 

then there can be an ADA violation. 

 EXHIBIT B

Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 120-3 Filed 09/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
Venet DESIR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0846

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JERRY DAVIS : CASE NO. 3:18cv192
Plaintiffs, 3
JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
v.

ECOLAB INC., et al.

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY

SS

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been
settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties,
provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if
settlement is not consummated.

Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be
aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate
appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if
necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jase rr Gun

WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT