alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 90 

Redesignating the Robert E. Lee Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery 

as the ‘‘Arlington House National Historic Site’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2022 

Mr. BEYER (for himself, Ms. WEXTON, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. CONNOLLY) 

submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Redesignating the Robert E. Lee Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery as the ‘‘Arlington House National Historic Site’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That— 

4 (1) the site administered by the National Park 

5 Service and dedicated as a memorial to Robert E. 

6 Lee pursuant to the joint resolution of June 29, 

7 1955 (Public Law 84–107; 69 Stat. 190), as amend8 ed by the joint resolution of June 30, 1972 (Public 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 90 IH 

1 Law 92–333; 86 Stat. 401), shall after the date of 

2 the enactment of this joint resolution be redesig3 nated and known as the ‘‘Arlington House National 

4 Historic Site’’; 

5 (2) any reference in any law, regulation, map, 

6 document, paper, or other record of the United 

7 States to the site referred to in paragraph (1) shall 

8 be considered to be a reference to the Arlington 

9 House National Historic Site; and 

10 (3) the joint resolution of June 29, 1955 (Pub11 lic Law 84–107; 69 Stat. 190) and the joint resolu12 tion of June 30, 1972 (Public Law 92–333; 86 Stat. 

13 401) are repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 
   Simmons Bank,   
Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
August 10, 2020  By 
/s/    NANCYWILLIS        
   Nancy Willis   Vice President**
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 64 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 1605, 

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor4 rection: Amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to 

5 authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2022 for military 

6 activities of the Department of Defense, for military con7 struction, and for defense activities of 
2 

•HCON 64 EH 

1 the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel 

2 strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 

2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 64 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

correction in the enrollment of the bill S. 1605. 

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make a
EX-4.6







Exhibit 4.6




Consent of Jim Lincoln




     I, Jim Lincoln, hereby confirm that I have read the Notice of Meeting and Management
Information Circular of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. (“Aurora”) dated March 20, 2009 (the
“Circular”) relating to the special meeting of shareholders of Aurora to approve the amalgamation
of Aurora and 59801 Newfoundland & Labrador Inc., which Circular incorporates by reference the
annual information form of Fronteer Development Group Inc. (“Fronteer”) dated March 27, 2008 for
its year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the technical report dated November 20, 2007 entitled “An Update
on the Exploration Activities of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. on the CMB Uranium Property,
Labrador, Canada, During the Period January 1, 2007 to October 31, 2007” prepared together with
Gary Giroux, Dr. D.H.C. Wilton, Mark O’Dea, Christopher Lee and Ian Cunningham-Dunlop (the
“Technical Report”) in the AIF or other documents incorporated by reference therein. I further
consent to the inclusion in the Circular and Fronteer’s registration statement on Form F-8 relating
to the Circular filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration
Statement”) of the Technical Report (through the inclusion by way of incorporation by reference of
the AIF in the Circular) and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Circular
and the Registration Statement or any documents incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Report and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Report contained in the Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Report
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Report.



	 	 	 
	March 20, 2009

	 	(signed) Jim Lincoln
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Jim Lincoln, P.Eng.
Salary Plan



 Exhibit 10.27 
 American Electric Technologies, Inc. 
 Salary Plan 
 
                                 
 Name of Participant: 
 The Board of Directors at its
meeting approved the following salary plan for you for: 
  

					
	 Base Salary
	 	= $	 	
	 Bonus Salary
	 	= $	 	
	 Total Expected Salary
	 	= $	 	
	 Restricted Stock Units
	 		 	shares (performance variable)

 The calculation of your bonus is $            
multiplied by performance against goals and the weight of each goal. Your goals and weighting are: 
  

			
	 GOAL
	  	WEIGHT
	 AETI EBT
	  	%
	 M&I EBT(excl. intl)
	  	%
	 Meeting Corporate Goals
	  	%
	 Balance Sheet Metrics
	  	%
	 Safety
	  	%
	 Non Quantifiable Objectives
	  	%

 All income calculations are based on internal 12/31/xx income statements excluding significant non- recurring
gains or losses (at management’s discretion). Income items must meet a minimum 75% attainment. Financial goals are capped at 150%. 
 Payments
will be made no later than 3/15/xx, and participant must be on the payroll at that time to be eligible. 
  

					
	  
	 		  	  

	Participant	 		  	President and CEO
#### Ex parte Morrison.

Opinion delivered July 13, 1901.

Statutes — Implied Repeal. — The act of March 28, 1899, entitled “An act to provide for the confirmation of titles to real estate,” does not impliedly repeal Sand. *&*H. Dig., ch. 25, relating to the confirmation of tax and other titles, since the two acts do not relate to the same thing.

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court.

Thomas B. Martin, Chancellor.

*Ex parte*application by B. Morrison for the confirmation of a tax title to land. From an adverse decision of the chancellor he has appealed.

*Marshall &*Coffman, for appellant.

The act of 1899 repeals the former statutes on “Confirmation of Titles.” When the legislature takes up an entire subject anew, and covers the whole ground by a new act, the former one is thereby repealed. 10 Ark. 588; 27 Ark. 419; 31 Ark. 19; 43 Ark. 425, 427; 46 Ark. 450; 47 Ark. 491; Am. Dig. 1900 *A,*4186&&. The two statutes are so repugnant that the latter one necessarily repeals the former. 50 Ark. 132; 51 Ark. 559; 53 Ark. 417; *ib.*339; 54 Ark. 237; 60 Ark. 59, 61; Am. Dig. 1900 *A,*4190*a.*

Wood, J.

The legislature of 1899 passed an act, entitled “An act to provide for the confirmation of titles to real estate” (Acts 1899, p. 133), which provides for the confirmation of land that is “wild or improved or in the actual possession of the petitioner or those claiming under him,” and prescribes the manner of procedure. The last section of the act provides for the repeal *518of all acts or parts of acts in conflict with it. We are asked by this appeal to say whether the above act repeals the provisions of chapter 25, Sand. H. Dig., relating to the “Confirmation of Titles.” The provisions of chapter 25, Sand. *&*li. Dig., have reference solely to the confirmation of tax titles and the other titles specifically named, and we think the learned chancellor properly held that the act of March 28, 1899, had no reference whatever to the confirmation of tax titles. Repeals by application are not favored. There are several provisions in chapter 25, Sand. & H. Dig., not contained in the act of 1899, and *vice versa.*But, as we construe it, since the two acts do not relate to the same thing, there is no necessary repugnance or inconsistency. One is a special law pertaining exclusively to the titles specifically named therein; the other relates to all other titles. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership I-D ("Issuer") for the period ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 29th day of March, 2006.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP I-D
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:18-cr-109-1

v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE

ANDREY SHUKLIN,

Defendant.

CRIMINAL MINUTES: SENTENCING

AUSA Matthew Singer and Megan Gaffney Painter appeared for the Government

Defendant appeared with counsel Martin Pinales, Eric Eckes, and Stephanie 

Kessler (by telephone)

Defendant sentenced as follows:

78 Months Imprisonment with credit for time served

Recommendations:

That the Defendant be placed in the closest facility to Miami, Florida

3 Years Supervised Release

Conditions: 

Must not commit another federal, state, or local crime

Shall be prohibited from possessing a firearm, ammunition, destructive device,

or dangerous weapon

Shall not unlawfully possess a controlled substance

Must refrain from the unlawful use a controlled substance

Must cooperate in the collection of his DNA

Shall comply with the standard conditions of supervised release that have been 

adopted by this Court

Must not incur any new credit charges, or open additional lines of credit, 

without the approval of the probation officer

Must provide the probation officer with access to any requested financial 

information and authorize the release of any requested financial information, 

which the probation office may share with the U.S. Attorney’s Office

Shall comply with the orders of the Department of Homeland Security, 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). If deported, the defendant shall 

not illegally reenter the United States

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 235 Filed: 05/10/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1585
Special Assessment: $100 Fine: $0 Restitution: TBD

Defendant remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshal

Judge: Douglas R. Cole

Courtroom Deputy: Scott Lang

Court Reporter: Sue Lopreato-Official

Date: May 10, 2022

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 235 Filed: 05/10/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1586
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certifications**
I, Martin A. Durant, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Carmike Cinemas, Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statementsfor external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
May 2, 2005
/s/ Martin A. Durant
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-40714 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JESUS ERNESTO MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CR-97-1
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to repres e n t Jesus Ernesto Mendoza has moved for leave to wit h d r a w a n d has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza has not filed a response and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolo u s i s sue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 19 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-40714 Document: 00511891267 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2012No. 11-40714

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 20 07).

2 Case: 11-40714 Document: 00511891267 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/19/2012
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-K of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending
December 31, 2008, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/S/ MICHAEL J. HOLMES                    
|Michael J. Holmes Chief Financial Officer

March 11, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB/A of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2004:



(1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Odyssey Marine
Exploration, Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ John C. Morris     
|John C. Morris         
|Chief Executive Officer
|July 29, 2005          



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

TIMOTHY WILLIAMSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF, et 

al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cv-569

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. 

Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the 

Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on September 7, 2018, 

submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). Plaintiff filed an objection 

(“Objection”) (Doc. 6).1

 

 1 The Objection argues Plaintiff has a viable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 12132 against Defendant 

Talbert House, who Plaintiff alleges refused to provide Plaintiff rehabilitation services due to the 

medicine Plaintiff was taking. This argument is not availing. 42 U.S.C. § 12132 states that “no 

qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from 

participation in or be denied the benefits of services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or 

be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.” (Emphasis supplied). A “public entity” 

includes “any State or local government” or “any department, agency, special purpose district, or 

other instrumentality of a State or a States or local government[.]” 42 U.S.C. § 12131(1)(A)-(B). 

In other words, a “public entity” is either a traditional government unit or created by one. See 

Edison v. Douberly, 604 F.3d 1307, 1309 (11th Cir. 2010). Conversely, private entities that 

contract with local governments are private, not public, entities. Id. There are simply no 

allegations in the Complaint from which the Court can infer that Talbert House is a “public 

entity,” i.e., that it is, or was created by, a traditional unit of Hamilton County government. The 

Objection (Doc. 6) is OVERRULED. 
2

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 

of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its 

entirety. Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) is ADOPTED; 

2. Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. 6) is OVERRULED; and

3. The Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 

1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), with the exception of Plaintiff’s official 

capacity claim against defendant Hamilton County Sheriff Jim Neil for 

allegedly violating Plaintiff’s religious rights by denying Plaintiff Kosher 

meals.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

4/4/19