2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan and Request for Redesignation 

for the 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

Air Resources Board Staff Report 

Analysis of the San Joaquin Valley 

2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan 

State of California 

Staff Report 

Analysis of the San Joaquin Valley 

2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan 

Release Date: October 12, 2007 

Scheduled for Consideration: October 25-26, 2007 
This document has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board 

and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily 

reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does the mention of trade 

names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. 

Electronic copies from this document are available for download from the Air Resources 

Board's Internet site at: http://www.arb.ca.qov/planning/sip/sivpm07/s~vpm07.htm. 

In addition, written copies may be obtained from the Public Information Office, Air 

Resources Board, 1001 1 Street, 1'' Floor, Visitors and Environmental Services Center, 

Sacramento, California 95814, (91 6) 322-2990. 

For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, 

audiocassette or computer disk. Please contact ARB's Disability Coordinator at 

(916) 323-4916 by voice or through the Califorria Relay Services at 71 1, to place your 

request for disability services. If you are a person with limited English and would like to 

request interpreter services, please contact ARB's Bilingual Manager at 

(91 6) 323-7053. 

For questions, contact: 

Ms. Sylvia Morrow or Patricia Velasco, Ph.D. 

Manager, PM Analysis Sect,ion Project Lead 

Phone: (91 6) 324-71 63 Phone: (91 6) 323-7560 

Email: smorrow@arb.ca.~ov Email: pvelasco@arb.ca.gov 

P.O. Box 281 5 

Sacramento, California 9581 2 
PRINCIPAL AUTHOR 

Patricia Velasco, Ph. D., Project Lead 

PROJECT MANAGERS 

Sylvia Morrow, Manager, Particulate Matter Analysis Section 

Karen Magliano, Chief, Air Quality Data Branch 

CONTRIBUTORS 

Air Qualitv and Transportation Planning 

Kurt Karperos, P.E., Air Quality and Transportation Planning Branch 

Jon Taylor, P.E., Manager, Motor Vehicle Assessment Section 

Jeff Lindberg, Planning Liaison to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 

John Nguyen, Air Pollution Specialist 

Dennis Wade, Air Pollutions Specialist 

Air Qualitv Data Branch 

Theresa Najita, Air Pollution Specialist 

Eugene Kim, Ph.D., Air Resources Engineer 

Emission lnventorv 

Karen Buckley-Fitts, Manager, Emission Inventory Systems Section 

Martin Johnson, P.E., Staff Air Pollution Specialist 

October 12,2007 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. I 

I . BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................... I 

II . REDESIGNATION REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................... 2 

Ill . PLAN EVALUATION .............................................................................................. 2 

A . The Valley Attains the PM 10 Standards ............................................................ 2 

B . U.S. EPA Approved the 2003 Valley PMlO SIP and the State Has Met 

Applicable Act Requirements ............................................................................. 5 

C . Improvement in the Valley's PMlO Air Quality is Due to Permanent and 

Enforceable Reductions in Emissions ............................................................ 5 

D . Maintenance Plan ........................................................................................... 7 

1 . Attainment Emission Inventory ....................................................................... 7 

2 . MaintenanceDemonstration .......................................................................... 8 

3 . PM10 Monitoring Network ............................................................................ 10 

4 . Verification of Continued Attainment ............................................................ 10 

5 . Contingency Plan .......................................................................................... I0 

6 . Transportation Conformity Budgets ............................................................. 11 

IV . STAFFRECOMMENDATION .............................................................................. 13 

APPENDIX A . PMIO Exceptional Events Recorded in The Valley from 2004 ........... through 2006 ....................................................................................... 14 

APPENDIX B . Emission Inventory ............................................................................ 17 

October 12. 2007 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

Proposal 

The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District or Valley) is 

designated as a nonattainment area, with a classification of "serious" for the national 

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or standards) for particulate matter of 10 microns 

in diameter or smaller (PMI 0). In June 2003, the San Joaquin Valley District adopted 

the 2003 PMI 0 Attainment Plan setting the control strategy for attaining the standards 

by December 31,201 0. As a mid-course review, the District adopted the 2006 PMI 0 

Plan, reaffirming the control strategy in the 2003 PMIO Attainment Plan. Due to the 

adoption of ARB and District rules in the 2003 PMIO Plan, the Valley's air quality has 

improved to the point that the District now attains the PMIO standards, ahead of the 

201 0 attainment deadline. 

In October 2006, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (US. EPA) determined the 

Valley attained the PMIO standards, based on 2003-2005 ambient monitoring data 

(71 FR 63642, 2006 clean data finding). In August 2007, U.S. EPA followed with a 

proposed affirmation of attainment, based on the evaluation of 2006 monitoring data 

(72 FR 49046). These U.S. EPA actions, however, do not constitute redesignation of 

the Valley to attainment, since further Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) requirements need to 

be met. The District prepared the 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan to address these 

requirements and request official redesignation to attainment. 

On September 20, 2007, the District adopted the 2007 Maintenance Plan. The plan 

officially requests the Valley be redesignated to attainment for the PMIO NAAQS and 

charts the course to maintain attainment for these standards. The staff of the Air 

Resources Board (ARB or Board) has reviewed the 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan and 

is recommending that the Board approve the plan and submit it to U.S. EPA as a 

revision to the State lrr~plementation Plan (SIP). 

Plan Addresses Act Requirements 

The 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan addresses both the 24-hour and the rescinded 

annual PMI 0 standards, and includes the following components: 

2005 attainment inventory consisting of annual and winter emission estimates for 

directly emitted PM 1 0 and nitrogen oxides (NOx), the limiting precursor for 

secondary PM 1 0 in the Valley; 

Demonstration that PMIO attainment concentrations at all monitoring stations in 

the Valley will be maintained through 2020; 

Commitment to ongoing monitoring network operation for continued verification 

of attainment; and 

Contingency provisions to address any fut~~re violations. 

October 12,2007 
In addition, eight years after the Valley is redesignated as attainment, the District is 

required to submit a revised PMlO Maintenance Plan, providing for continued 

attainment for an additional ten years. 

Adopted Rules Provide for Continued Attainment 

Since the adoption of the Valley's 2003 PMlO Attainment Plan, direct PM10 and NOx 

emissions that form PMlO have been reduced significantly. The District now attains the 

PMlO standards ahead of the 201 0 attainment deadline. ARB adopted State measures 

for mobile sources achieve the 10 tpd of NOx and 0.5 tpd of direct PMlO 201 0 emission 

reductions commitment in the Valley's 2003 PMlO Attainment Plan. The District has 

also adopted all of the rules committed to in the 2003 PM10 Attainment Plan and will not 

remove, replace, or suspend any emission reduction measure commitments in the plan, 

even after the Valley is redesignated as attainment. Air quality modeling based on 

these err~ission reductio~is demonstrates that the Valley will continue to demonstrate 

attainment through 2020. In addition, ARB and the district are on track to achieve 

additional reductions in pollutants that form PMlO from the recently adopted 

2007 Ozone Attainment Plan. 

The Monitoring Network is Adequate 

The District's PMlO monitoring network consists of 15 monitoring sites distributed 

throughout the San Joaquin Valley. In the approval of the 2003 Amended PMlO 

Attainment Plan, U.S. EPA found that the Valley's PMlO monitoring network "meets all 

applicable regulatory requirements and is adequate to support the technical evaluation 

of the PMI 0 problem." In the October 2006 determination that the District attains the 

PMlO national standards, U.S. EPA's concludes that the Valley's PMlO monitoring 

network provided adequate data to support the attainment finding. 

Contingency Process Addresses Any Future Violations 

The District's proposes the following mechanism to address any exceedances that 

might occur after redesignation to attainment: 

Analyze causes of exceedance or sequence of concentrations just below the 

24-hour exceedance level. 

If event is not due to a natural or exceptional event, determine if ongoing 

emission reductions from rules in approved plans will prevent future 

exceedances. 

If further emission reductions are needed, identify applicable control measures 

from the District's recently adopted 2007 Ozone Attainment Plan or, if applicable, 

the 2008 PM2.5 Attainment Plan, currently under development. 

October 12,2007 
Updated Conformity Budgets 

The Valley transportation agencies need new PMIO Plan transportation conformity 

budgets (budgets) based on the updated version of the model used to estimate 

emissions from motor vehicles (EMFAC2007). Updated budgets for PMIO must be 

approved by U.S. EPA by January 2008. Delay in approval beyond this date could 

hinder local transportation projects and restrict federal transportation funding. 

During the development of the 2007 PMI 0 Maintenance Plan, the Valley tra~isportation 

agencies provided updated transportation activity for use in calculating conformity 

budgets. This information was not available in time for the District to incorporate it into 

the adopted plan. ARB staff worked with the transportation agencies and the District to 

reflect the updated activity data in conformity budgets, and post the budgets for the 

required 30-day public review. In the Resolution approving the 2007 PMI 0 

Maintenance Plan, the District recognized the need for technical refinements to the 

conforn'lity budgets after adoption of the 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan. ARB staff 

proposes ARB adoption of the updated transportation conformity budgets for the region. 

Staff Recommendation 

ARB staff concurs with the 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan and Request for 

Redesignation and the District's supporting technical analysis. ARB staff recommends 

that the Board approve the San Joaquin Valley 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan, including 

updated transportation conformity budgets, emission inventory, and maintenance 

demonstration as a revision to the California SIP for subm~ittal to U.S. EPA. In addition, 

ARB staff recommends that the Board approve the District's redesignation request from 

nonattainment to attainment for the federal PMIO standard. 

October 1 2,2007 

--=- - --. - 
1. BACKGROUND 

Covering nearly 25,000 square miles, the Valley is one of the dominant features in 

California's landscape. One of the fastest growing regions in the State, the Valley is 

home to more than 3.6 million people. The Valley has four large cities, Stockton, 

Modesto, Fresno, and Bakersfield, each with a population greater than 200,000. 

Numerous smaller cities and towns in the Valley are separated by large expanses of 

agricultural lands. However, as urbanization in the Valley continues to increase, more 

land is converted to non-agricultural uses. 

Open to the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta in the North, the Valley is surrounded 

by the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the east, the Pacific Coast range to the west, and 

the Tehachapi Mountains to the south. The climate and geography of the Valley create 

optimal conditions for forming and trapping air pollution. 

In the Valley, PMI 0 is a complex mixture of primary or directly emitted particles (dust 

and soot), and secondary particles or aerosol droplets formed in the atmosphere from 

precursor gases. PMI 0 includes the subset of fine particles with a diameter of 

2.5 microns or less (PM2.5). The nature and levels of PMI 0 concentrations in the 

Valley typically differ by season. During the fall, higher PMIO concentrations occur 

between October and November, during relatively stable atmospheric conditions prior to 

rainfall, and are mostly driven by directly emitted PMIO. During the winter, higher PMIO 

concentrations occur between late November and January during extended periods of 

stagnant weather with cold, damp, foggy conditions, which are conducive to the 

formation of secondary particulates. At these times, PMIO is dominated by ammonium 

nitrate formed from NOx and ammonia emissions. Winter PMIO also contains wood 

smoke and directly emitted particles. During the winter, PMI 0 is mostly comprised of 

particles within the PM2.5 size range. 

In 1987, U.S. EPA adopted national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for PM10, 

with a 24-hour PMIO standard of 150 micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m3) and an 

annual standard of 50 pg/m3. The Valley is designated as nonattainment with a 

classification of "serious" for these standards. U.S. EPA revoked the annual PMIO 

standard effective December 18, 2006. 

In June 2003, the San Joaquin Valley District adopted the 2003 PMIO Attainment Plan 

setting the control strategy for attaining the standards by December 31, 2010. As a 

mid-course review, the District adopted the 2006 PMIO Plan, reaffirming the control 

strategy in the 2003 PMIO Attainment Plan. Due to the adoption of ARB and District 

rules in the 2003 PMIO Plan the Valley's air quality has improved to the point that the 

District now attains the PMIO standards, ahead of the 2010 attainment deadline. 

In October 2006, U. S. EPA determined the Valley attained the PMIO standards, based 

on 2003-2005 ambient monitoring data (71 FR 63642, 2006 clean data finding). In 

August 2007, U.S. EPA followed with a proposed affirmation of attainment, based on 

1 

October 1 2,2007 
the evaluation of 2006 monitoring data (72 FR 49046). These U.S. EPA actions, 

however, do not constitute redesignation of the Valley to attainment, since further Clean 

Air Act (CAA or Act) requirements need to be met. The District prepared the 

2007 PMI 0 Maintenance Plan to address these requirements and request official 

redesignation to attainnient. 

II. REDESIGNATION REQUIREMENTS 

ARB staff reviewed the District's 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan within the context of the 

Act, which identifies the following requirements an area must meet to be redesignated 

to attainment: 

A. The PMIO standards have been attained; 

B. The District has an approved State Implementation Plan and the State has met 

all applicable Act requirements for PMIO in the Valley; 

C. The improvement in PMIO air quality is due to permanent and enforceable 

emission reductions; and 

D. U.S. EPA has approved a maintenance plan. 

The Act also sets the general framework for maintenance plans'. The 2007 PMIO 

Maintenance Plan provides for continued maintenance of the PMI 0 standards for 

10 years after redesignation and includes the following components: 

1. Attainment emission inventory; 

2. Maintenance demonstration; 

3. Commitment to continue the monitoring network operation; 

4. Commitment for verification of continued attainment; and 

5. Contingency plan to promptly correct any violation of the PMI 0 NAAQS that 

occurs after the Valley has been redesignated. 

Ill. PLAN EVALUATION 

Based on review of the 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan and the District's supporting 

technical analysis ARB staff concurs with the Plan. The following sections describe the 

major elements of the Plan and the redesignation request. 

A. The Valley Attains the PMIO Standards 

PMIO concentrations are measured at fifteen monitoring stations located throughout the 

Valley (Figure 1). Table I lists air quality data for the 2004-2006 period which 

demonstrate that the Valley meets both the 24-hour and annual PMI 0 standards. The 

values used for assessing attainment are based on quality assured federal reference 

1 Calcagni, John, Memorandum, Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to 

Affainrnent, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 

September 4, 1992. 

2 

October 1 2,2007 
(FRM) or federal equivalent monitors (FEM). Due to regulatory rounding conventions, a 

24-hour PMI 0 concentration exceeds the standard if it measures 155 micrograms per 

cubic meter (Clg/m3) or over. The 24-hour standard is met when the estimated nl-~mber 

of exceedances measured over a three-year period averages one or less per year. The 

annual standard is met when the annual average averaged over three years is less than 

or equal to 50 ug/m3. 

Figure 1. PMlO Monitoring Stations in the San Joaquin Valleya 

a. The monitor at Tracy started operating in 2006. 

3 

October 12,2007 
Table 1. San Joaquin Valley PMl 0 Data from 2004 to 2006 

(based on filter-based monitoring) 

I Ave I 1 I I 

Three-Year Annual 

Ave ragk ,, 

, (pg/m3):. 

44 

~onitoring Station 

Name 

Bakersfield-California 

I Street I I I I 

Bakersfield-Golden State 

Clovis-North Villa Ave 

Corcoran-Patterson Ave 

~resno-1 St Street 

Fresno-Drummond 

0 bse rved 

Three-Year 

24-hour. 

'Maximuma 

(pg/m3) 

153" 

( Modesto-14th street 96 0 30 

:Estimbtecf' 

24-Hour 

Exceqdance" 

DPys 

0 

1 54b 

1 04 

140 

117 

132 

Hanford-S. Irwin Street 

Merced-2334 M Street 

1 Stockton-Wagner-Holt 69 0 23 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

142 

94 

Oildale-Manor 

Stockton-Hazelton Street 

47 

34 

43 

34 

41 

a. Data do not include PMlO concentrations caused by natural/exceptional events which are excluded 

from regulatory consideration. 

b. Because of regulatory rounding conventions, a measured 24-hour PMlO concentration exceeds the 

standard when it is equal to or over 155 pg/m3. 

0 

0 

145 

82 

' School 

Turlock-S Minaret Street 

Visalia-N Church Street 

On four days over the last three years (2004-2006), the 24-hour standard was exceeded 

due to extrenie wind conditions that are excluded under the federal rule for natural 

events. The Act allows areas to exclude approved natural events in regulatory findings, 

since they are not reasonably preventable or controllable. The four events were 

submitted to U.S. EPA to be flagged as natural events (Table 2). A more detailed 

description of each of these natural events is found in Appendix A to this report. 

43 

29 

In the 2006 clean data finding, U.S. EPA had already approved the exclusion of the 

Septerr~ber 3, 2004 event. In the 2007 proposed affirmation of attainment, U.S. EPA 

has also proposed concurrence with the exclusion of the three natural events recorded 

in 2006. 

0 

0 

97 

145 

October 12,2007 

- 

44 

30 

0 

0 

3 1 

44 
Table 2. Natural Events Recoded in the Valley during the 2003-2006 Period 

6. U.S. EPA Approved the 2003 Valley PMIO SIP and the State Has Met 

Applicable Act Requirenients 

Date 

Sept. 3,2004 

Sept. 22,2006 

- 

Oct. 25,2006 

Dec. 8,2006 

U.S. EPA approved the amended 2003 PMIO Attainment Plan on May 26,2004, except 

for the contingency measures. On October 2006, U.S. EPA determined that the Valley 

attains the PMIO NAAQS and, under ,the Clean Data Policy, suspended the contingency 

measure requirement. Therefore, ARB and the District have met all of the Act 

requirements applicable for a serious PMIO nonattainment area to be considered for 

redesignation. 

C. Improvement in the Valley's PMIO Air Quality is Due to Permanent and 

Enforceable Reductions in Emissions 

Location 

Concentration, Monitor 

Type 

Corcoran 

21 7 pg/m3, FRM 

Corcoran 

21 5 pg/m3, FRM 

261 pg/m3, FEM 

Ba kersfield-Golden 

157 pg/m3, FRM 

170 pg/m3, FEM 

Oildale 

Corcoran 

304 pg/m3, FEM 

Ba kersfield-Golden 

193 pg/m3, FEM 

Corcoran 

162 pg/m3, FEM 

Bakersfield-Golden 

21 3 pg/m3, FEM 

ARB adopted measures achieve the 10 tpd NOx and 0.5 tpd direct PMIO 2010 emission 

reductions commitment from State mobile sources in the Valley's 2003 PMIO 

Attainment Plan. The District has adopted all of the rules committed to in the 

2003 PMIO Attainment Plan and will not remove, replace, or suspend any emission 

5 

October 12,2007 

Cause 

Dust resulting froni high 

speed winds north of 

Corcoran 

Transported dust resulting 

from dry conditions 

throughout the Valley and 

strong winds north of 

0 

Co rco ra n 

Transported dust resulting 

from dry conditions 

throughout the Valley and 

high winds northwest of 

Corcoran 

Transported dust resulting 

from dry conditions 

throughout the Valley and 

high winds in the 

southeastern portion of the 

Valley 

U.S. EPA 

Approval 

Status 

Approved 

Proposed 

Proposed 

Proposed 
reduction measure commitments in the plan, even after the Valley is redesignated as 

attainment. 

Over the past 15 years, PMI 0 air quality in the Valley has improved as control 

measures in air quality plans have been adopted. The severity and frequency of PMIO 

episodes have significantly decreased. In the early 1 99OYs, maximuln 24-hour 

concentrations surpassed 250 pg/m3, over 40 estimated PMIO exceedances occurred, 

and annual average concentrations were close to 80 pg/m3. In comparison, from 

2003-2006, there were no violations of the 24-hour PMIO standard and the maximum 

three-year average concentration was 47 pg/m3. Figure 2 illustrates the downward 

trends in the maximum 24-hour PMIO concentrations recorded in the Valley and the 

maximum three-year averages. ARB staff evaluated these trends based on the 

nonparametric statistical test, know as the Theil test, that U.S. EPA uses in national air 

quality trend analyses2. This method tests for whether upward or downward trends are 

real (significant) or a chance product of year-to-year variation (not significant). Theil test 

results indicate the 1990 to 2006 downward trends in maximum 24-hour and three-year 

annual PMIO concentrations are statistically significant. As shown in Figure 2, the 

24-hour maximum PMIO concentration in 2006 is close to the level of the standard. 

However, it is still below the standard. 

Figure 2. San Joaquin Valley Trends in Maximum 24-hour and 

Three-Year Average PMI 0 Concentrations 

Data do not include measurements identified as naturallexceptional events 

2 U.S. EPA, National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report, Publication No. EPA 454lR-03-005. Office 

of Air Quality and Standards, Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division, Research Triangle Park, 

North Carolina. 2003. htt~://www.epa.~ovlairIairtrends/aatrnd031 

6 

October 1 2,2007 
During this period, the Valley has undergone rapid economic growth and even with 

continuous increases in population and vehicle travel, PMIO and PMIO precursor 

emissions have decreased. For example, between 2000 and 2005 pop~~lation grew by 

14% and vehicle miles traveled by 28%) yet PMIO emissions decreased by 10% and 

NOx emissions by 12% (Table 3), as the result of ongoing control programs. 

Table 3. Valley Trends in Emissions, Population, and Vehicle Miles Traveled 

Based on qualitative analyses of long-term air quality and weather variables - including 

temperature, rainfall, wind speed, and atmospheric stability - the District found no 

conclusive evidence that meteorological conditions during 2003-2006 were unusually 

favorable to lower PMIO levels. 'The District points out that in the last two decades 

PMI 0 air quality has improved even though weather regimes have cycled between 

those favorable and unfavorable to PMIO buildup. . 

NOx Emissions (tpd) 

PMI 0 Emissions (tpd) 

D. Maintenance Plan 

The 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan addresses both the 24-hour as well as the rescinded 

annual PMIO standards and includes the following components: attainment emission 

inventory; maintenance demonstration; commitment to continue monitoring network 

operation; commitment for verification of continued attainment; and contingency plan. 

Average Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled11 000 77,176 98,950 28 

2000 

677 

324 

1. Attainment Emission Inventory 

An emission inventory is a critical tool used to evaluate, control, and mitigate air 

pollution which is comprised of a systematic listing of the sources of air pollutants along 

with the amount of pollutants emitted from each source or category over a given period 

of time. Emission inventories are estimates of the air pollutant emissions released into 

the environment - they are not direct ambient concentration measurements. To 

determine the expected emissions in future years, emission inventories incorporate the 

effects of growth and existing regulations (baseline inventories). An attainment 

inventory identifies the level of emissions during the period when air quality data show 

attainment. 

2005 

606 

284 

U.S. EPA first determined PMIO attainment in the Valley based on 2003-2005 air quality 

data and has proposed continued affirmation based on 2006 data. The District selected 

the 2005 emission inventory - the third year of the period when air quality first showed 

Reduction 

(%) 

10 

12 

Increase 

(Yo) 

7 

October 12,2007 
attainment in the Valley - as the attainment inventory in the PMIO Maintenance Plan. 

ARB staff has updated the attainment inventory presented in the District's 2007 PMIO 

Plan to reflect emission reductions achieved by ARB adopted measures that had not 

been accounted for. Table 4 presents the updated 2005 attainment inventory of direct 

PMIO and NOx precursor emissions in the Valley split by broad source category. 

Appendix B includes the detailed 2005 attainment inventory (annual and winter), prior 

year 2000 emissions, plus projected er~issions for 2010 and 2020. 

Table 4. San Joaquin Valley: 2005 Attainment Emission Inventory 

2. Maintenance Demonstration 

Source Category 

Stationary and Area-wide 

On-Road Mobile Vehicles 

Off-Road Vehicles and Equipment 

Total 

In the 2003 PMIO Attainment Plan, the District used a combination of chemical mass 

balance (CMB) receptor modeling, photochemical modeling, and the linear rollback 

technique to demonstrate attainment. In the maintenance demonstration for the 

24-hour PMIO standard, the District followed updated U.S. EPA modeling guidance in 

using modeling results in a relative manner, to estimate future year PMIO 

concentrations. The District estimated the rate of change in PMIO concentrations at 

individual monitoring sites from the concentrations modeled for 2005 and 2020 and 

applied the resulting rate of change to measured 2006 PMIO concentrations. 

CMB is a statistical model using information on the chemical composition of ambient air 

samples collected at monitoring sites and information on the composition of source 

emissions to apportion each source's contribution to the measured ambient sample. 

The 2003 PMI 0 Attainment Plan includes CMB receptor modeling analysis for the 

eleven monitoring sites that, at the time, were nonattainment for the 24-hour standard, 

the annual standard, or both standards. 

Regional photochemical models are used to predict how emissions, weather, and 

terrain iniluence future levels of PMIO, based on monitoring data, emission inventories, 

and atmospheric chemistry. To determine how precursor emission reductions reduce 

PMIO concentrations in the Valley, the 2003 PMIO Attainment Plan used regional 

photochemical modeling with data collected during the 1995 particulate matter intensive 

monitoring field study. The modeling indicates that a 1.5 percent reduction in NOx 

emissions leads to a 1 percent reduction in the ammonium nitrate concentration. 

Annual 

(trd) 

8 

October 12,2007 

PMIO 

259.8 

14.8 

9.9 

284.5 

Winter 

(tpd) 

NOx 

1 24.0 

328.0 

154.0 

606.0 

PMIO 

232.6 

14.9 

8.8 

256.3 

NOx 

122.5 

342. I 

141 .O 

605.6 
To demonstrate maintenance of 24-Iiour and annual standards, the District used the 

CMB analysis results and the 1.5 to 1 ratio of NOx to nitrate resulting from the 

photochemical modeling in combination with linear rollback. Linear rollback assumes 

that future PMIO levels above background concentrations will decrease in proportion to 

projected emission reductions. In the linear rollback for each site, CMB source 

categories are matched to the appropriate emission inventory categories. The District 

conducted linear rollback analyses for episodic and annual conditions using 2005 and 

2020 baseline emission inventories. Tables 5 and 6 list the projected 2020 values for 

the 24-ho~~r and the annual PMIO standards, which demonstrate continued attainment 

throughout the Valley. 

Table 5. Projected Maintenance of 24-hour PMIO NAAQS in the 

San Joaquin Valley 

Site Name 

1 Bakersfield-California Ave I 153 128 

Winter Episode 

Observed Concentration 

during 2006 Episode 

2020 Projected 

Concentration 

(pg/m3) 

Bakersfield-Golden State 

Clovis- North Villa Ave 

(pg/m3) 

Corcoran-Paterson Ave. 

Fresno-1 St Street 

154 

97 

Fresno-Dn~mmond Street 

Hanford-S. Irwin Street 

Merced-2334 M Streeta 

Modesto-1 4'"treet 

oildale-~ano? 

Stockton-Hazelton Streeta 

Stockton-Wagner-Holt 

Schoola 

134 

80 

136- 

117 

1 Turlock-S Minaret Streeta 

1 Visalia-N Church Street 

1 24 

97 

132 

142 

69 

96 

no data 

79 

62 

Fall Episode 

Corcoran-Patterson Ave. 

a. Analysis was not conducted for sites recording concentrations below 90 yg/m3 - 60% the level of the 

standard - during the 2006 winter episode. 

b. During the winter episode, concentrations at Oildale were assumed to be consistent with 

concentrations at Bakersfield-California 

114 

120 . - 

79 

128 

- 

- 

83 

145 

I Hanford-S. Irwin Street I 

October 12,2007 

- 

122 

137 

124 

134 

121 
Table 6. Projected Maintenance of Annual PMIO NAAQS in the 

San Joaquin Valley 

Site Name 2005 Annual Average 1 2020 Projected Annual I 

I Visalia-N Church Street 44.3 40.2 

Fresno-Drl-~mmond Street 

-The Valley is projected to maintain attainment with the PMIO standards due to ARB, 

District, and other state and local control measures already in place. In addition, future 

emissions in PMIO precursors are projected to decrease even further as controls 

resulting from the implementation of the 2007 San Joaquin Valley Ozone Plan as well 

as the 2008 PM2.5 Attainment Plan, now under development, phase in. 

3. PMIO Monitoring Network 

Concentration 

(vg/m3) 

38.7 

The District.commits to continue PMI 0 monitori~ig to verify sustained attainment of the 

PMIO standards. Figure 1 shows the geographical distribution of the PMIO monitoring 

sites throughout the Valley. U.S. EPA1s approval of the 2003 PMIO Attainment Plan 

states that the Valley's PMIO monitoring network "meets all applicable regulatory 

requirements and is adequate to support the technical evaluation of the PMI 0 problem" 

(69 FR 30033). In addition, in the October 2006 clean data finding, U.S. EPA concludes 

that the Valley's PMI 0 monitoring network provided adequate data to support the 

attainment finding. 

Average Concentration 

(1.1g/m3) 

34.9 

Bakersfield-Golden State 

Hanford-S. Irwin Street 

4. Verification of Continued Attainment 

To verify continued attainment of the PMIO standards, the District commits to complete 

annual reports on the progress made in fulfilling commitments in PM2.5 and ozone 

plans. The District will make the reports public and will present them to the District's 

Governing Board beginning in 2008. The reports will include air quality data showing 

continued PMIO standard attainment; updates on the development, adoption, and 

implementation of control measures in ozone and PM2.5 attainment plans; and 

emission reductions status. 

43.2 

40.3 

5. Contingency Plan 

39.9 

36.7 

The Act requires the maintenance plan to include contingency provisions for prompt 

correction of any PMIO standard violation that might occur after the area has been 

redesignated to attainment. The maintenance plan is not required to contain fully 

adopted contingency measures that will go into effect without further State action as is 

required in nonattainment SIPS. Instead, for maintenance plans, the area must have a 

plan to ensure that contingency measures are adopted once they are triggered. 

I0 

October 12,2007 
The District is selecting the level of the 24-hour PMI 0 standard (1 55 pg/m3) or a 

sequence of levels just below the standard as trigger to determine when contingency 

measures need to be implemented. If after examination, the event is not classified as 

due to a natural or exceptional event, the District will analyze the event to determine its 

causes. The District will determine if emission reductions froni rules adopted as part of 

or committed to in approved plans would prevent any future violation. If further 

emission reductions are needed, the District would identify applicable control measures 

from the District's recently adopted 2007 Ozone Attainment Plan or the 2008 PM2.5 

Attainment Plan, currently under development. 

6. Transportation Conformity Budgets 

Under section 176(c) of the Act, transportation activities that receive federal funding or 

approval must be found to be fully consistent with the SIP. U.S. EPAYs transportation 

rule, found in 40, CFR parts 51 and 93, details requirements for establishing motor 

vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in SIPS for the purpose of ensuring the conformity 

of ,transportation plans and programs with the SIP attainment or maintenance 

demonstration. The budgets act as a "ceiling" for future on-road mobile source 

emissions. Exceedances of the budgets indicate an inconsistency with the SIP, and 

could jeopardize the flow of federal funds for transportation improvements in the region. 

Projected regional on-road mobile source emissions are compared to these budgets 

during the periodic updates of regional transportation plans and programs. 

The federal transportation conformity regulation3 requires SIPS to specify the levels of 

on-road motor vehicle emissions that are consistent with attainment and maintenance of 

NAAQS. To receive federal approval of funding, transportation agencies must 

demonstrate that emissions from transportation plans, programs, and projects conform 

with these "emission budgets." 

The Valley transportation agencies require new PMIO budgets based on ARB'S latest 

on-road mobile source emjssion factor model EMFAC2007 - released by ARB on 

November 1,2006 - to amend Transportation Improvement Plans and implement 

project changes. The currently approved PMIO budgets are based on EMFAC2002 

emission projections, which are lower than PMIO budgets based on EMFAC2007, due 

to better understanding of emissions. The Valley transportation agencies require 

EMFAC2007 as the basis for conformity determinations for plan amendments 

scheduled for Winter 2008. Updated PMIO budgets must be approved by U.S. EPA by 

January 2008 to replace existing budgets. Delay in approval beyond this date would 

hinder local transportation projects and restrict federal transportation funding. 

During the development of the 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan, the Valley transportation 

agencies provided updated transportation activity for use in calculating conformity 

budgets. This information was not available in time for the District to incorporate it into 

3 U.S. EPA maintains online information on its transportation conformity program, including access to 

relevant rulemakings, policy guidance, and reports at: htt~://www.epa.nov/otaaltrans~ltrawonf.htm. 

11 

October 12,2007 
the adopted plan. ARB staff worked with the transportation agencies and the District to 

reflect the updated activity data in conformity budgets, and post the budgets for the 

required 30-day public review. In the Resolution approving the 2007 PMIO 

Maintenance Plan, the District recognized the need for technical refinements to the 

conformity budgets after adoption of the 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan. ARB staff 

proposes ARB adoption of the updated transportation conformity budgets for the region. 

On-road motor vehicle emission budgets for transportation conformity were established 

for the years 2005 and 2020. The new emission budgets for NOx and PMIO are shown 

in Table 7. The budgets are derived with EMFAC2007 projections and matched to 

activity data reported by the eight county Councils of Government using ARB'S vehicle 

miles traveled (VMT) matching methodology. These results are adjusted to account for 

any baseline emission reductions not included in the model, and any err~issions that the 

model does not project (e.g. PMIO err~issions from road construction activities, 

reentrained paved road dust, and reentrained unpaved road dust). The conformity 

budgets are based on the average annual daily emissions. The District determined that 

they are applicable for both the annual and 24-hour PMIO standards. Conformity 

assessments conducted by the transportation agencies against these budgets will use 

the emission factors in this Plan with updated activity. 

Table 7. Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for PMIO in the San Joaquin Valley, 

Annual Average (tons per day) 

Fugitive dust emissions from roads will continue to grow due to growth in VMT. 

Section 93.1 24 of the federal conformity rule, in particular 93.1 24(c), allows the Plan to 

establish trading mechanisms between budgets for pollutants or precursors. The basic 

idea is to allow conformity demonstrations for analysis years to use NOx reductions 

beyond the attainment level to offset PMIO increases from this VMT growth. 

The emission budgets established in this Plan fulfill the requirements of the Act and 

U.S. EPA regulations to ensure that transportation activities support progress and 

attainment of the PMI 0 standards. With the upcoming implementation of the niore 

12 

October 12,2007 
health protective federal eight-hour ozone and PM2.5 standards, we recognize that the 

motor vehicle budgets associated with those SIPS must reflect additional reductions. 

Directly emitted PMIO poses a unique challenge that is not experienced with ozone or 

PMl 0 precursors. As mentioned above, directly emitted PMl 0 from paved roads has a 

linear relationship with VMT. Thus, as VMT grows, paved road dust also grows. Since 

the opportunities for controlling paved road dust emissions are limited, ARB will 

continue to work closely with the District, the Councils of Government, and other 

transportation agencies to address the emissions growth. 

IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 

ARB staff has reviewed the Valley's 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan and Request for 

Redesignation and consulted with the District staff during this review. ARB staff finds 

that the Valley 2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan meets all applicable Act requirements. 

ARB staff believe that implementation of this Plan would continue to maintain PMIO 

levels below the national air quality standards throughout the Valley. Therefore, we 

recommend that the Board adopt the San Joaquin Valley 2007 PMIO Maintenance 

Plan, including updated transportation conformity budgets, emission inventory, and 

maintenance demonstration as a revision to the California SIP for submittal to 

U.S. EPA. In addition, ARB staff recommends that the Board approve the District's 

redesignation request from nonattainment to attainment for the federal PMIO standard. 

October 12,2007 
APPENDIX A 

PMI 0 Exceptional Events Recorded in the San Joaquin Valley from 

2004 through 2006 

The U.S. EPA has established criteria for the handling and review of air quality data 

influenced by exceptional events. Exceptional events are defined as events that are 

unusual or naturally occurring, that affect air quality, and are not reasonably 

controllable. The concentrations generated by these events must be in excess of 

normal historical fluctuations, including background. In addition, demonstration of a 

clear causal relationship between the high concentration recorded at the monitoring site 

and the exceptional event must be shown, as well as corroboration that 'but-for' the 

event, there would not have been an exceedance of the National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard. 

2004 PM 10 Exceptional Events 

September 3, 2004 

Monitoring Site, Concentration, Monitor Type: 

Corcoran, 21 7 pg/m3, FRM 

Ab~iormally high wind speeds (over 3 standard deviations) were reported 

throughout the Central Valley on September 2nd and 3rd. These northwesterly 

winds entrained dust in the northern portion of the San Joaquin Valley, upwind of 

Corcoran. The plume moved southward, depositing dust at the Corcoran 

monitoring site which peaked in the late morning, gradually decreasing 

throughout the day. 

This event met the EPA's criteria for determination of an exceptional event. The 

concentrations were in excess of background and normal historical variations. 

Only 3 to 5% of daily averaged PMIO concentrations in September have 

exceeded I00 ug/m3 between 2000 and 2006. A clear and causal relationship 

between the event and the monitoring site concentrations was established based 

on the magnitude and timing of peak winds which were associated with the ho~~rs 

of elevated PMIO concentrations. In addition, the substantial increase in 

concentrations on September 3, during a time when ar~thropoger~ic emissions 

activity was constant, demonstrated that "but for" the natural windblown dust 

emissions, no exceedance would have occurred. 

October 12,2007 
2006 PM 10 Exceptional Events 

September 22,2006 

Monitoring Site, Concentration, Monitor Type: 

Corcoran, 21 5 pg/m3, FRM 

Corcoran, 261 pg/m3, FEM 

Bakersfield-Golden, 157 pg/m3, FRM 

Bakersfield-Golden, 170 yg/m3, FEM 

Oildale, 162 yg/m3, FRM 

Dry conditions throughout the San Joaquin and Southern Sacramento Valleys 

coupled with high winds, allowed for the entrainment of dust to the north of 

Corcoran. Transported southward by the same high winds, the dust reached 

Corcoran on the morning of September 22, 2006, where lower wind speeds 

allowed for deposition at the monitoring site. Continuing to move southeast, 

additional PMIO was entrained into ,the atmosphere, reaching the Bakersfield 

and Oildale area by early afternoon. Without the arid conditions, high winds, and 

subsequent entrained dust, the measured concentrations measured at Corcoran, 

Oildale, and Bakersfield-Golden on September 22, 2006 would have been below 

the national standard. 

This event met the EPA's criteria for determination of an exceptional event. The 

concentrations were in excess of background and normal historical variations. 

Only 3 to 5% of PMI 0 concentrations in September have exceeded 100 ug/m3 

since 2000. A clear and causal relationship between the event and the 

monitoring site concentrations was established based on the magnitude and 

timing of peak winds which were associated with the hours of elevated PMIO 

concentrations. In addition, the substantial increase in concentrations on 

September 22, during a time when anthropogenic emissions activity was 

constant, demonstrated that "but for" the natural windblown dust emissions, no 

exceedance would have occurred. 

October 25,2006 

Monitoring Site, Concentration, Monitor Type: 

Corcoran, 304 pg/m3, FEM 

Bakersfield-Golden, 193 pg/m3, FEM 

Dry conditions throughout the San Joaquin Valley, brought on by below nornial 

precipitation, combined with high winds northwest of Corcoran, allowed for the 

en trainmelit of dust into the atmosphere. Lower wind speeds in the Central and 

Southern portions of the San Joaquin Valley accounted for the subsequent 

deposition of dust at Corcoran on the morning of October 25. Concentrations 

remained high in Corcoran for most of the day. The dust cloud spread toward 

Bakersfield by the afternoon, resulting in high concentrations - although lower 

than those seen in Corcoran. PMIO levels remained elevated at both sites the 

15 

October 12,2007 
next day, but the daily averages were below both the State and National 

standards. 

This event met the EPA's criteria for determination of an exceptional event. The 

concentrations on October 25 were in excess of both background and normal 

historical variations. Historically, both the wind speeds seen during the event 

and the concentration levels recorded at Corcoran and Bakersfield were 

considered unusually high. Both the magnitude of these concentrations and the 

timing of the peak winds helped establish a clear and causal relationship 

between the event and monitol-ing site concentrations. The substantial increase 

in concentrations on October 25, during a time when anthropogenic emissions 

activity was constant, demonstrated that "but for" the natural windblown dust 

emissions, no exceedance would have occurred. 

December 8,2006 

Monitoring Site, Concentration, Monitor Type: 

Corcoran, 162 j~glm~, FEM 

Bakersfield-Golden, 21 3 j~~lm~, FEM 

Continued dry conditions in the San Joaquin Valley, coupled with high winds, 

particularly southeast of Bakersfield, allowed for the entrainment and subsequent 

transport of dust to the monitoring sites in Bakersfield beginning in the morning 

hours. Strong winds west-northwest of Corcoran increased PM 10 transport from 

Bakersfield and the areas between to the northern portions of the Valley. 

Concentrations increased at several sites, including an hourly high of 645 uglm3 

at Fresno, although Corcoran was the only site north of Bakersfield to exceed the 

NAAQS. 

This event met the EPA's criteria for determination of an exceptional event. The 

concentrations were in excess of background and normal historical variations. 

PMlO concentrations at Corcoran or Bakersfield have exceeded 100 j~~lrn~ only 

10 times in December since 1997. In addition, fugitive dust dominated events in 

December are rare. A clear and causal relationship between the event and the 

monitoring site concentrations was established based on both the magnitude and 

timing of peak winds associated with the hours of elevated PMl 0 concentrations. 

In addition, the substantial increase in concentrations on December 8, during a 

time when anthropogenic emissions activity was constant, denionstrated that "but 

for" the natural windblown dust emissions, no exceedance would have occurred. 

16 

October 12,2007 
APPENDIX B 

Emission Inventory 

This Appendix contains emission inventory tables for directly emitted PM10, NOx, ROG, 

and SOX. The emission inventory reflects reductions due to all ARB measures adopted 

through Decerr~ber 31, 2006. The tables list annual and winter average emissions in 

tons per day (tpd) for 2000,2005,2010, and 2020. 

17 

October 12,2007 
1 WOOD AND PAPER 1 0.50 1 0.54 1' 0.61 1 1.11 1 0.50 1 0.53 1 0.60 1 1.08 1 

18 

October 12,2007 
ARCHITECTURAL 

COATINGS AND RELATED 

GLASS AND RELATED 

PRODUCTS 

OTHER (INDUSTRIAL 

PROCESSES) 

Stationary Subtotal 

AREA-WIDE SOURCES 

CONSUMER PRODUCTS 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 I I I I I I I I 

1.05 

0.83 

27.15 

PROCESS SOLVENTS 

PESTICIDESIFERTILIZERS 

ASPHALT PAVING 1 

ROOFING 

RESIDENTIAL FUEL 

1 CONSTRUCTION AND I I I I 1 1. I 1 I 

COMBUSTION 

FARMING OPERATIONS 

1.08 

0.14 

23.48 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

FUGITIVE WINDBLOWN 

11.85 

84.30 

DEMOLITION 

PAVEDROADDUST 

UNPAVED ROAD DUST 

19 

October 12,2007 

1.18 

0.16 

24.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

11.34 

61.52 

11.62 

41.67 

46.70 

1.42 

0.19 

26.39 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

9.70 

61.69 

10.88 

44.56 

42.30 

1.08 

0.84 

26.78 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

9.04 

62.70 

11.94 

46.82 

41.55 

1.08 

0.14 

23.41 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

22.84 

64.58 

11.79 

58.43 

43.08 

1.18 

0.15 

23.82 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1.42 

0.18 

26.31 

21.84 

51.05 

10.64 

39.34 

35.25 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 - 

18.64 

51.43 

9.97 

42.06 

31.57 

17.34 

52.84 

10.94 

44.19 

31.01 

10.80 

55.14 

31.97 
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEYAIR BASIN -- DIRECT PMIO EMISSlQNS , . (tpd) - : , i ,-. .. * (continuation) ,. , , r I‘- . a 

I DIESEL TRUCKS - 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 

3. SUBCATEGORY 

MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY 

GAS TRUCKS (MHDV) 

HEAVY HEAV? DUTY GAS 

TRUCKS (HHDV) 

LIGHT HEAVY DUTY 

*. ANNUAL- .~, 

2000 1 : 2005.1 2010 1 .:?2020 

0.02 

0.01 

(LHDV1) 

LIGHT HEAVY DUTY 

WINTER , $*, ' 

. -, 

.ZOOO:~- .zoos -1. '. 2o$6:I2 'iozo: 

MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY 

DIESEL TRUCKS (MHDV) 

HEAVYHEAVYDUTY 

DIESEL TRUCKS (HHDV) 

MOTORCYCLES (MCY) 

OTHER MOKE SOURCES 

Al RCRAFT 11.111 1.361 1.451 1.751 1.111 1.361 1.451 1.75 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

HEAVY DUTY DIESEL 

URBAN BUSES (UB) 

HEAVY DUTY GAS URBAN 

BUSES (UB) 

SCHOOL BUSES (SB) 

OTHER BUSES (OB) 

MOTOR HOMES (MH) 

On-Road Subtotal 

TRAINS 1 0.641 0.661 0.581 0.591 0.64) 0.661 0.581 0.59 I I I I I I I I 

0.64 

11.77 

0.02 

0.01 

0.01 

0.09 

0.04 

0.00 

0.08 

0.02 

0.02 

15.49 

0.71 

10.28 

0.06 

SHIPS AND COMMERCIAL 

BOATS 

RECREATIONAL BOATS 

OFF-ROAD 

RECREATIONAL 

VEHICLES 

OFF-ROAD EQUIPMENT 

FARM EQUIPMENT 

FUEL STORAGE AND 

HANDLING 

Other Mobile Subtotal 

October 12.2007 

0.02 

0.01 

0.06 

0.04 

0.00 

0.10 

0.03 

0.02 

14.81 

GRAND TOTAL 

0.62 

8.78 

0.05 

0.07 

0.59 

0.09 

4.39 

3.88 

0.00 

10.76 

0.02 

0.01 

0.05 

0.04 

0.00 

0.11 

,0.02 

0.02 

13.52 

324.03 

0.46 

4.23 

0.04 

0.06 

0.64 

0.08 

3.87 

3.25 

0.00 

9.91 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.05 

0.00 

0.12 

0.02 

0.02 

9.71 

284.49 

0.64 

11.83 

0.02 

0.04 

0.83 

0.09 

2.97 

2.50 

0.00 

8.46 

0.01 

0.01 

0.09 

0.04 

0.00 

0.08 

0.02 

0.02 

15.55 

282.10 

0.02 

0.01 

0.71 

10.34 

0.06 

0.04 

1.38 

0.11 

1.25 

0.95 

0.00 

6.08 

0.06 

0.04 

0.00 

0.10 

0.03 

0.02 

14.86 

'* -. 

290.00 

0.05 

\ 

0.62 

8.82 

0.05 

0.07 

0.22 

0.10 

4.38 

3.03 

0.00 

9.54 

0.46 

4.25 

0.04 

0.04 

0.00 

0.11 

0.02 

0.02 

13.57 

283.63 

0.05 

0.00 

0.12 

0.02 

0.02 

9.72 

0.06 

0.24 

0.09 

3.86 

2.54 

0.00 

8.79 

256.28 

0.03 

0.31 

0.11 

2.97 

1.95 

0.00 

7.41 

0.04 

0.51 

0.12 

1.26 

0.74 

0.00 

5.02 

252.72 

J< * 

259.41 
October 12,2007 

PRODUCTION 

INCINERATORS 

SOIL REMEDIATION 

OTHER (WASTE 

DISPOSAL) 

LAUNDERING 

DEGREASING 

COATINGS AND RELATED 

PROCESS SOLVENTS 

1 PRINTING 

ADHESIVES AND 

SEALANTS 

OTHER (CLEANING AND 

SURFACE COATINGS) 

OIL AND GAS 

PRODUCTION 

PETROLEUM REFINING 

PETROLEUMMARKETING 

OTHER (PETROLEUM 

PRODUCTION AND 

MARKETING) 

CHEMICAL 

FOOD AND 

AGRICULTURE 

MINERAL PROCESSES 

0.03 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.17 

0.11 

0.02 

0.00 

0.23 

9.79 

2.44 

0.03 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.11 

0.25 

0.02 

0.00 

0.30 

9.11 

2.33 

METAL PROCESSES 

WOOD AND PAPER 

0.07 

0.00 

0.03 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.12 

0.25 

0.02 

0.00 

0.35 

8.96 

2.55 

0.03 

0.00 

0.09 

0.00 

0.07 

0.00 

0.03 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.13 

0.25 

0.03 

0.00 

0.41 

8.79 

3.05 

0.03 

0.00 

0.03 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.17 

0.1 

0.02 

0.00 

0.22 

------ 9.42. 

2.28 

0.04 

0.00 

0.05 0.06 

0.00 0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.11 

0.25 

0.02 

0.00 

0.30 

9.06 

2.30 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.12 

0.25 

0.02 

0.00 

0.34 

8.93 

2.52 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.001 

0.00 

0.00 

0.13 

0.25 

0.03 

0.00 

0.41 

8.77 
GLASS AND RELATED 

PRODUCTS 8.73 9.38 8.37 10.13 8.94 9.38 8.37 10.12 

OTHER (INDUSTRIAL 

PROCESSES) 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 

Stationary Sources Subtotal 136.1 1 105.85 100.49 103.67 126.09 97.28 92.42 96.48 

AREA-WIDE SOURCES 

CONSUMER PRODUCTS 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 

ARCHITECTURAL 

COATINGS AND RELATED 

PROCESS SOLVENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

PESTICIDESIFERTILIZERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

ASPHALT PAVING I 

ROOFING I 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

RESIDENTIAL FUEL ' COMBUSTION 6.72 6.34 5.96 5.73 10.14 9.61 8.95 8.44 

FARMING OPERATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

CONSTRUCTION AND 

DEMOLIl'ION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

PAVEDROADDUST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

UNPAVED ROAD DUST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

FUGI-1-IVE WINDBLOWN 

DUST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

1 FIRES 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.0-3 

MANAGED BURNING AND 

DISPOSAL 12.12 11.93 11.72 11.30 15.94 15.66 15.35 14.72 

COOKING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

OTHER (NIISCELLANEOUS 

PROCESSES) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Area-Wide Sources 

Subtotal 18.87 18.30 17.71 17.07 26.11 25.29 24.33 23.19 

ON-ROAD MOBILE SOURCES 

LIGHT DUTY PASSENGER I 

(LDA) 40.58 22.17 14.54 5.80 43.92 23.95 15.70 6.25 

LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS - 1 

(LDT2) 1 29.81 19.78 1 13.81 1 6.54 1 32.37 1 21.40 1 14.93 ( 7.06 

MEDIUM DUTY TRUCKS I 

22 

October I 2.2007 

(MDV) 15.75 13.42 9.46 4.82 17.11 14.52 10.22 5.20 

LIGHT HEAW DUTY GAS 

TRUCKS - 1 (LHDVI) 

LIGHT HEAW DUTY GAS 

TRUCKS - 2 (LHDV2) 

MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY 

GAS TRUCKS (MHDV) 

5.31 

1.25 

2.85 

4.72 

1.03 

2.17 

4.00 

0.97 

1.72 

3.75 

0.86 

0.85 

5.67 

1.34 

3.06 

5.02 

1.09 

2.32 

4.22 

1.02 

1.84 

3.94 

0.90 

0.90 
(LHDV1) 1 0.33 1 5.41 ( 3.44 1 1.94 1 0.34 1 5.58 1 3.54 1 1.99 

LIGHT HEAVY DLlTY 

HEAVYHEAVYDUTYGAS 

TRUCKS (HHDV) 

LIGHT HEAVY DUTY 

1 DIESEL TRUCKS - 1 

1 DIESEL TRUCKS (MHDV) 1 19.60 21.31 1 16.79 1 7.02 1 20.26 1 22.02 1 17.35 1 7.25 1 3 

2.98 

DIESEL TRUCKS - 2 

(LHDV2) 

1 MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY 

1 HEAVY HEAVY DUTY I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 

2.54 

2.37 

DIESEL TRUCKS (HHDV) 

MOTORCYCLES (MCY) 

1.92 

3.34 

HEAVY DUTY DIESEL 

URBAN BUSES (UB) 

HEAVY DUTY GAS URBAN 

October 12, ,2007 

192.84 

0.45 

BUSES (LIB) 

SCHOOL BUSES (SB) 

OTHER BUSES (OB) 

MOTOR HOMES (MH) 

On-Road Mobile Sources 

Subtotal 

1.46 

2.67 

1.99 

21 3.43 

1.44 

0.23 

2.06 

0.67 

1.49 

338.76 

3.22 

1.38 

2.24 

191.89 

1.48 

0.28 

2.40 

1.09 

1.4 

327.91 

5.23 

21.46 

1.49 

1.43 

0.34 

31.29 

15.00 

0.00 

76.25 

OTHER MOBILE SOLIRCES 

2.75 

2.44 

2.33 

79.69 

1.64 

0.31 

2.48 

0.98 

0.97 

276.42 

2.06 

3.44 

2.46 

3.04 

23.64 

0.99 

1.27 

0.16 

70.80 

41.05 

0.00 

140.95 

1.57 

198.81 

0.49 

0.40 

2.27 

0.54 

0.52 

124.66 

4.34 

20.04 

1.03 

1.39 

0.19 

55.96 

32.57 

0.00 

115.52 

5.24 

21.46 

1.50 

3.61 

0.28 

31.14 

19.18 

0.00 

82.41 

4.34 

20.04 

1.04 

3.50 

0.18 

55.68 

41.66 

0.00 

126.43 

AIRCRAFT 

TRAINS 

SHIPS AND COMMERCIAL 

BOATS 

RECREATIONAL BOATS 

OFF-ROAD 

RECREATIONAL 

VEHICLES 

OFF-ROAD EQUIPMENT 

FARM EQUIPMENT 

FUEL STORAGE AND 

HANDLING 

Other Mobile Sources 

Subtotal 

2.75 

2.05 

2.45 

30.51 

1.7 

0.88 

0.14 

79.18 

49.74 

0.00 

164.08 

1.42 

220.22 

1.57 

0.25 

2.13 

0.70 

1.62 

355.43 

2.46 

30.51 

1.19 

2.20 

0.13 

78.75 

63.60 

0.00 

178.84 

2.31 

3.05 

23.64 

1.00 

3.18 

0.15 

70.42 

52.48 

0.00 

153.92 

197.99 

1.61 

0.30 

2.48 

1.14 

1.22 

342.06 

81.55 

1.78 

I 

2.40 

0.34 

2.55 

1.03 

1.04 

287.75 

2.53 

0.44 

2.34 

0.56 

0.55 

129.16 
I STATIONARY SOURCES 

ELECTRIC UTILITIES 0.23 0.48 0.51 0.58 0.21 0.44 0.47 0.53 

COGENERATION 0.29 0.43 0.44 0.46 0.29 0.43 0.44 0.46 

OIL AND GAS 

PRODUCTION 

(COMBUSTION) 2.10 3.29 3.24 3.32 2.10 3.29 3.24 3.32 

PETROLEUM REFINING 

(COMBUSTION) 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 

MANUFACTURING AND 

INDUSTRIAL 0.26 0.35 0.37 0.43 0.22 0.30 0.32 0.36 - 

FOOD AND 

AGRICULTLIRAL 

PROCESSING 2.27 2.32 2.27 2.20 2.10 2.14 2.10 2.03 

SERVICE AND 

COMMERCIAL 0.28 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.38 0.49 0.50 0.52 

OTHER (FUEL 

COMBUSTION) 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.08 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.07 

SEWAGE TREATMENT 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 

LANDFILLS 

INCINERATORS 

SOIL REMEDIATION 

OTHER (WASTE 

PRINTING 1 1.48) 1.651 1.811 2.16) 1.48 1 1.65 1 1.80 1 2.15 

ADHESIVES AND 

DISPOSAL) 

LAUNDERING 

DEGREASING 

COATINGS AND RELATED 

PROCESS SOLVENTS 

1.43 

0.00 

0.08 

0.47 

0.05 

11.05 

8.16 

SEALANTS 

OTHER (CLEANING AND 

SURFACE COATINGS) 

OIL AND GAS 

October 12,2007 

1.59 

0.00 

0.07 

PRODUCTION 

PETROLEUM REFINING 

PETROLEUM MARKETING 

OTHER (PETROLEUM 

PRODUCTION AND 

0.54 

0.06 

1.47 

7.62 

0.72 

2.80 

1.74 

0.00 

0.08 

33.15 

1.75 

7.34 

0.58 

0.07 

1.49 

8.57 

3.20 

3.39 

2.01 

0.00 

0.10 

27.93 

0.66 

7.55 

0.00 

3.06 

11.32 

0.46 

0.33 

0.01 

0.49 

0.15 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.00 -- 0.00 

0.70 

0.08 

1.61 

10.47 

3.45 

3.97 

CHEMICAL 

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE 

MINERAL PROCESSES 

METAL PROCESSES 

WOOD AND PAPER 

GLASS AND RELATED 

PRODUCTS 

1.42 

0.00 

0.08 

26.78 

0.66 

8.20 

0.47 

0.05 

11.05 

8.12 

4.08 

4.99 

2.48 

.11.03 

0.39 

0.20 

0.00 

0.10 

1.59 

0.00 

0.07 

23.99 

0.67 

9.49 

0.54 

0.06 

1.47 

7.57 

0.72 

2.79 

2.35 

11.35 

0.37 

0.35 

0.01 

0.37 

1.74 

0.00 

0.08 

33.14 

1.72 

7.33 

2.01 

0.00 

0.10 

0.58 

0.07 

1.49 

8.52 

3.19 

3.38 

2.60 

11.79 

0.41 

0.37 

0.01 

0.41 

0.70 

0.08 

1.61 

10.41 

27.92 

0.66 

7.54 

3.45 

3.97 

3.07 

12.84 

0.49 

0.43 

0.01 

0.49 

4.08 

4.99 

26.77 

0.66 

8.20 

23.98 

0.67 

9.49 

2.47 

9.79 

0.33 

0.20 

0.00 

0.10 

2.35 

9.98 

0.35 

0.28 

0.01 

0.37 

2.59 

10.37 

0.38 

0.29 

0.01 

0.41 
ROOFING 1 2.24 1 2.35 1 2.39 1 2.45 1 1.64 1 1.72 1 1.75 1 1.79 

1 RESIDENTIAL FUEL 

AREA-WIDE SOURCES 

CONSUMER PRODUCTS 

ARCHITECTURAL 

COATINGS AND RELATED 

PROCESS SOLVENTS 

PESTlClDESlFERTlLlZERS 

ASPHALT PAVllVG I 

COMBUSTION 

FARMING OPERA1-IONS 

CONSTRUCTION AND 

UNPAVEDROADDUST 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 

FUGITIVE WINDBLOWN 

DEMOLITION 

PAVED ROAD DUST 

24.68 

11.27 

25.24 

6.32 

59.83 

(LDT2) ( 19.67 ( 14.01 1 11.06 1 7.05 1 20.93 1 14.93 1 11.85 1 7.48 

MEDIUM DUTY TRUCKS 

0.00 

0.00 

DUST 1 

FIRES 1 

MANAGED BURNING AND 

DISPOSAL 

COOKING 

OTHER (MISCELLANEOUS 

PROCESSES) 

Area-W ide Sources Subtotal - 

23.48 

9.41 

23.49 

28.39 

10.84 

21.56 

5.94 

65.41 

25 

October 12,2007 

23.48 

7.73 

25.15 

23.62 

- 9.82 

22.38 

24.68 

9.25 

26.87 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.09 

16.57 

0.43 

0.00 

- 146.66 

(MDV) 

LlGHT HEAVY DUTY GAS 

TRUCKS - 1 (LHDVI ) 

LIGHT HEAVY DUTY GAS 

TRUCKS - 2 (LHDV2) 

MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY 

GAS TRUCKS (MHDV) 

HEAVYHEAVYDUTYGAS 

TRUCKS (HHDV) 

LlGHT HEAVY DUTY. 

DIESEL TRUCKS - 1 

LHDVI ( ) 

4.91 

71.01 

ON-ROAD MOBILE SOURCES 

23.61 

8.06 

23.97 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.09 

16.32 

0.44 

0.00 

146.94 

9.63 

6.93 

1.71 

5.25 

2.01 

0.02 

28.38 

8.90 

23.07 

4.41 

85.89 

8.03 

3.67 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.10 

16.05 

0.48 

0.00 

1 50.74 

18.37 

7.45 

7.89 

5.38 

1.26 

3.35 - 

1.39 

0.19 

12.15 

59.80 

LlGHT DUTY PASSENGER 

(LDA) 

LlGHT DUTY TRUCKS - 1 

(LDT1) 

LlGHT DUN TRUCKS - 2 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.11 

15.47 

0.55 

0.00 

1 69.66 

47.02 

18.23 

6.26 

3.15 

0.89 

11.41 

65.38 

27.22 

10.49 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.09 

19.39 

0.43 

0.00 

154.30 

7.89 

3.44 

17.67 

6.98 

4.47 

2.27 

0.48 

9.40 

70.98 

8.42 

85.86 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.09 

19.02 

0.44 

0.00 

1 54.42 

49.72 

19.50 

10.22 

7.47 

1.86 

0.64 

0.36 

0.13 

2.15 2.39 

0.00 

0.00 

28.58 

11.18 

0.86 

0.16 

0.00 

0.10 

18.62 

0.48 

0.00 

1 56.98 

8.37 

5.78 

1.37 

0.00 

0.1 1 

17.78 

0.55 

0.00 

1 74.86 

0.34 

0.13 

6.67 

3.40 

0.96 

4.72 

2.47 

0.53 

2.21 

0.02 

1.49 

0.19 

0.91 

0.16 
DIESEL TRUCKS - 2 

(LH DV2) 

MEDIUM HEAW DUTY 

DIESEL TRUCKS (MHDV) 

HEAWHEAVYDUTY 

DIESEL TRUCKS (HHDV) 

MOTORCYCLES (MCY) 

HEAVY DUTY DIESEL 

TRAINS 1 1.591 1.641 1.541 1.581 1.59 1 1.64 1 1.54 1 1.58 

FARM EQUIPMENT 1 12.97 1 10.85 1 8.28 1 3.45 1 10.67 1 9.00 1 6.90 1 2.88 

FUEL STORAGE AND 

OTHER MOBILE SOURCES 

AIRCRAFT 1 5.81 1 6.75 1 6.47 1 7.24 1 5.79 1 6.73 1 6.46 1 7.23 

0.09 

0.43 

15.82 

2.63 

SHIPS AND COMMERCIAL I 

BOATS 

RECREATIONAL BOATS 

OFF-ROAD 

RECREATIONAL 

VEHICLES 

OFF-ROAD EQUIPMENT 

I 

0.15 

0.53 

16.13 

5.76 

0.12 

14.86 

5.26 

21.97 

HANDLING 

Other Mobile Sources 

Subtotal 

October 12,2007 

s1 

GRAND TOTAL 

0.14 

0.50 

15.71 

5.06 

0.12 

13.18 

6.89 

19.76 

4.74 

67.32 

433.38 

0.10 

0.36 

8.45 

5.03 

0.09 

11.86 

7.87 

15.35 

3.53 

62.72 

382.651' 

0.09 

0.43 

15.95 

2.79 

0.09 

11.03 

10.35 

10.28 

2.08 

53.54 

356.36 ' 

e0.15 

0.53 

16.25 

6.02 

0.12 

7.69 

5.66 

22.07 

1.36 

45.38 

341.76 

0.14 

0.50 

15.83 

5.23 

0.11 

7.68 

7.35 

19.84 

4.51 

58.10 

0.10 

0.36 

8.55 

5.08 

837?91 

0.08 

7.42 

8.37 

15.40 

3.40 

55.75 

0.09 

7.76 

10.45 

10.18 

- 

386129: 

1.92 

48.10 

1.23 

41.42 

, - I ' Zr' 23 

$358.65 

",% ' ,;? $ "5 9, 

3i3.5f 
1 STATIONARY SOURCES 

IL AND GAS PRODUCTION 

ETROLEUM REFINING 

PRODUCTION AND 

October 12,2007 
28 

October 12,2007 

TRUCKS - 1 (LHDVI) 

LIGHT HEAW'DUTY DIESEL 

TRUCKS - 2 (LHDV2) 

MEDIUM HEAVY DUTY 

DIESEL TRUCKS (MHDV) 

HEAVY HEAVY DUTY DIESEL 

TRUCKS (HHDV) 

MOTORCYCLES (MCY) 

0.02 

0.17 

1.46 

0.00 

0.03 

0.23 

1.75 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 

0.23 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 

0.31 

0.00 

0.02 

0.17 

1.45 

0.00 

0.03 

0.23 

1.75 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 

0.23 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 

0.31 

0.00 
DIESEL URBAN 

FUEL STORAGE AND 

October 1 2,2007 


2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan and Request for Redesignation 

for the 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

Transportation Conformity Budgets 

and Documentation 

Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for PMIO 

San Joaquin Valley, Annual Average, Tons per Day 

lubject Top Page: Conformity Budgets for 2007 San Joaquin Valley ... http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/sj~udge.,. 

CONFORMITY BUDGETS FOR 2007 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY PMIO MAINTENANCE PLAN 

This page updated September 24,2007 

Supporting Documentation 

Calculation Methodology for 2005 Budgets (pdf) 

2007 San Joaquin Valley PMlO Maintenance Plan 

The Board is one of six boards, departments, and offices under 

the umbrella of the California Environmental Protection Agency. 

- CallEPA I - ARB I - ClWMB ( - DPR I - DTSC I - OEHHA 1 SWRCB 

........................................................................... 

:- 2020 

............................................................... 

2020 ,- ............................. 

2020 

?- .......................................................... 

,- 2020 

.................................................................................... 

,- 2020 

..... _ ........................................................................... 

!- 2020 

.. .............................................- ................................ 

2020 

........... .................................... 

: 

/ 

' 

! 

lofl 11/8/2007 12:35 PM 

- 

j 

.............................. - 

Vehicle Activity 1 ................................................................................ I 

Fresno i I ....................................................................... i 

Kern 

................................................ ._ ......... / 

Kings 

............................................................. I 

Madera i ............................................................ .... 

.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. . ! 

..................................................... ..-.I 

2005 ' 

-.. .............................................. ; 

12005 : .......................................................................................................................... 

12005 

- 

' 1 .......................................................... 

,- 2005 : " ........................................................ ............I 

Tulare i ... ............................. 8 

2005 

............................................................... ..... .... ................................................................ 

;F *. Merced !- I 

... ..". ................................................................... .J ..................... ............................................................... ._ 6.. 

San Joaquin ! ............................................................................. ......, 

Stanislaus j .................................................................... ........., 

.- 2005 ; ......................................................................................... .i 

2005. ! ......................................................................................... + 

[Fresno COG] 

Transportation Activity Data 2005 

Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled peripds available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

Do not include external gateways 

Arferials include expressways, state highways that are not freeways and freeway ramps 

Freeways only 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

168 0.0044% 

1,817 0.0472% 

168,503 4.3750% 

12,650 0.3285% 

59.619 1.5480% 

265,466 6.8926% 

420.752 10.9245% 

519,463 13.4874% 

387,747 10.0675% 

530.224 13.7668% 

391,627 10.1683% 

522.423 13.5643% 

224.435 5.8273% 

346,564 8.9983% 

lGne Miles 1 591 1 I 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

3,851,458 100.0000%~4.882,802 100.0000% 11,536,906 100.0000% 

3,651,458 100.0000% 4,882,802 100.0000% 11,536,906 100.0000% 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

20,271.166 

1,821 0.0373% 0 0.0000% 

5,187 0.1062% 0 0.0000% 

244,168 5.0006% 627,483 5.4389% 

20.800 0.4260% 13,642 0.1 182% 

82.271 1.6849% 117,561 1.0190% 

368.196 7.5407% 629,720 5.4583% 

664.121 13.6012% 1,003,326 8.6967% 

596.636 12.2191% 1,884.837 16.3375% 

487.974 9.9937% 1,085,693 9.4106% 

616.119 12.6182% 1,341,862 11.6310% 

435.490 8.91 89% 1,007,295 8.731 1 % 

772,816 15.8273% 852,836 7.3922% 

146,836 3.0072% 1,808,932 15.6795% 

440.368 9.0187% 1.163.718 10.0869% 
[Fresno COG], 

Transportation Activity Data 2020 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

L I Total ( 5.350.269 100.0000% 6,819,307 100.0000%' 16,087,164 100.0000%] 

28.256.740 5,350.269 100.00000/0 6,819,307 100.0000% 16,087,164 100.0000% 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

- Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. , 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntramnal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52 50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

highway. that are not freeways and freeway ramps 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

Lane Miles 1 6781 I 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

6.477 0.121 1% 8.403 0.1232% 7.604 0.0473% 

19,277 0.3603% 11,230 0.1647% 5,035 0.0313% 

244.916 4.5776% 373,641 5.4792% 883.250 5.4904% 

31.483 0.5884% 79,353 1.1637% 22.473 0.1 397% 

109.097 2.0391% 196,132 2.8761% 183,279 1.1393% 

404.363 7.5578% 624.503 9.1579% 882.951 5.4885% 

656.077 12.2625% 868,507 12.7360% 1,581,870 9.8331 % 

704.573 13.1689% 839.158 12.3056% 2,553,966 15.8758% 

529,901 9.9042% 685.466 10.0518% 1,556,927 9.6781% 

761,077 14.2250% 892,336 13.0854% 1,644,272 10.2210% 

509.445 9.5219% 655.699 9.6153% 1,779.884 11.0640% 

713.802 13.3414% 913.368 13.3939% 1.276.373 7.9341% 

215,664 4.0309% 105.312 1.5443% 2.214.454 13.7653% 

444,116 8.3008% 566,198 8.3029% 1,494.827 9.2920% 

I 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT X 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 
[Kern COG] 2005 

Transportation Activity Data 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

- Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from yourmodel. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

1173956 Do not indude external gateways 

380150 

Arterials include expressways, state highways that are not freeways and freeway ramps 

8497661 Freeways only 

17181709 

AM 2 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT Ye 

2121 0.0918% 

7879 0.3411% 

86333 3.7374% 

50431 2.1832% 

102408 4.4333% 

230367 9.9727% 

182381 7.8954% 

171747 7.4350% 

97746 4.231 5% 

178842 7.7422% 

143361 6.2062% 

228521 9.8928% 

48387 2.0947% 

779445 33.7427% 

2309969 IOO.M)OO% 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

13427 0.0781% 

59326 0.3453% 

690862 4.0209% 

391630 2.2793% 

791378 4.6059% 

1764104 10.2673% 

1378813 8.0249% 

1301537 7.5751% 

700364 4.0762% 

1311501 7.6331% 

1017592 5.9225% 

.I659184 9.6567% 

366579 2.1335% 

5735411 33.3809% 

17181708 100.0000% *->->-- - 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 -22.50 

22.51-27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51-37.50 

37.51 -42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61-52.50 

52.51-57.50 

57.51-62.50 

62.51-67.50 

67.51 -72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

Lane Miles I 4790 I 1998 

Mid 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT D/. 

2875 0.0828% 

12812 0.3688% 

160574 4.6226% 

90034 2.5919% 

186203 5.3604% 

406833 11.71 18% 

312667 9.0009% 

293797 8.4577% 

147325 4.241 1% 

265850 7.6532% 

193040 5.5572% 

335892 9.6695% 

75628 2.1772% 

990185 28.5051% 

3473716 100.0000% 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

2869 0.0684% 

13212 0.3151% 

164018 3.9113% 

93455 2.2286% 

191900 4.5762% 

422584 10.0773% 

332686 7.9335% 

322272 7.6852% 

170680 4.0702% 

323861 7.7231% 

248541 5.9269% 

391838 9.3441% 

87289 2.0816% 

1428228 34.0587% 

4193434 100.0000% 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT YO 

5562 0.0772% 

25423 0.3529% 

279936 3.8855% 

157709 2.1890% 

310866 4.3148% 

704320 9.7760% 

551079 7.6490% 

513721 7.1305% 

284614 3.9505% 

542948 7.5361% 

432650 6.0052% 

702934 9.7568% 

155275 2.1552% 

2537553 35.2213% 

7204589 100.0000% 
[Kern COG] 

Transportation Activity Data 2020 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

EYFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

- Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

Do not include externalgateways 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

highways 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

AM 2 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

: thal ' are 

Mid 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

! not freeways and freeway ramps 

Do not forget to Include infrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

l~ane Miles I 5682 1 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 
Kings County (KCAG) 

Transportation Activity Data 2005 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

Nofes: ' Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

VMT by ~acilit~ ~~~e(~ail~ only) 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

Do not include external gateways 

Arterials include expressways, state highways that are not freeways and freeway ramps 

Freeways only 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

1 ~otall 3360822 I 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

Lane Miles I 2664 I 

2008 2677 

Off Peak 

(if avaflable) 

VMT % 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 -47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

660 0.0196% 

24 0.0007% 

233,712 6.9540% 

7,935 0.2361% 

30.971 0.9215% 

113,201 3.3682% 

162,645 4.8394% 

120,940 3.5985% 

154,337 4.5922% 

637,038 18.9548% 

669.718 19.9272% 

263.91 1 7.8526% 

965,730 28.7349% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0. 0.0000% 

3,360,822 100.0000% . - - - - 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

. 
Kings County (KCAG) 

Transportation Activity Data 2020 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

Roadway Class 1 VMT 

Local . I 382035 Do not include external gateways 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

1,305 0.0278% 

2.158 0.0460% 

354,265 7.5509% 

10,879 0.2319% 

46,715 0.9957% 

167,149 3.5627% 

199.072 4.2431% 

205.391 4.3778% 

446.998 9.5275% 

587.056 12.5127% 

1 ,I 28,828 24.0602% 

335,065 7.1417% 

1,206,791 25.7220% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

4,691,672 100.0000% 

- - . . - - - - . . .--338 

Major Arterial I 1764645 Arferials include expressways, state 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

I I Totall 4691672 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

pway 1 1354654 

I 

highways 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

Freeways only 

that are "of 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

' freeways and freeway ramps 

l~ane Miles 1 2856 1 
MADERA COUNTY 

Transportation Activity Data 2005 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

I I Totall 4,557,089 I 

Do not forget to include intraronal VMT in the local vmt 

llane Miles I 2.144 I 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42,51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

0 0.0000% 

2,769 0.0608% 

306,616 6.7283% 

17,790 0.3904% 

91,099 1.9991 % 

370.462 8.1293% 

352.392 7.7328% 

643.570 14.1224% 

389,372 8.5443% 

891.078 19.5537% 

828,429 18.1789% 

659.717 14.4767% 

3,796 0.0833% 

4,557,090 100.0000% 

50 not include external gateways 

Arterials include expressways, state highways that are not freeways and freeway ramps 

Freeways only 

Roadway Class 

Local 

Collector 

Major Arterial 

Freeway 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

VMT 

304,001 

927,902 

1.470.077 

1,855.1 09 
MADERA COUNTY 

Transportation Activity Data 2020 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See nofe below 

Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

VMT by Facility Type(Dai1y Only) 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

Do not include external gateways 

expressways, state highways thaf are not freeways and freeway mmps 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

0 0.0000% 

17,780 0.2428% 

510,545 6.9708% 

50,161 0.6849% 

133.469 1.8223% 

719,721 9.8268% 

504.664 6.8905% 

337.908 4.6137% 

1.421.357 19.4067% 

2,363,303 32.2678% 

1,030,679 14.0725% 

232.745 3.1778% 

1.707 0.0233% 

7,324,038 100.0000% 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the kcal vmt 

Lane Miles I 2,263 1 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 
Merced County MCAG 

Transportation Activity Data 2005 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

- Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

Do not include external gateways 

Arterials include expressways, state 

Freeways only 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

0 0.0000% 

14396 0.2000% 

309521 4.3000% 

172756 2.4000% 

316719 4.4000% 

410296 5.7000% 

41 7494 5.8000% 

827789 11.5000% 

870978 12.1000% 

640637 8.9000% 

1921911 26.7000% 

93576 1.3000% 

323918 4.5000% 

878176 12.2000% 

3 0.0000% 

3 0.0000% 

3 0.0000% 

3 0.0000% 

7198179 100% 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

highways that are not 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

not available 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

not available 

freeways 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

not available 

and freeway ramps 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

Lane Miles 1 2550 1 
Merced County MCAG 

Transportation Activity Data 2020 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods 

Models with oeak and off 

available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

not available 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

14025 0.1291% 

48059 0.4423% 

499096 4.5933% 

290994 2.6781% 

672967 6.1 934% 

703818 6.4774% 

920505 8.4716% 

897955 8.2640% 

1567891 14.4296% 

1340559 12.3374% 

1584275 14.5804% 

407331 3.7487% 

1557841 14.3371% 

360506 3.3178% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

10865822 100% 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 87.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

I I 

Total1 10865822 1 1 

Do not forgef to include intrazonal VMT in the local vrnt 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

not available 

Lane Miles 1 2706 1 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

not available 

Do not include external gateways 

Arterials inclrrde expressways, state highways that are not freeways and freeway tamps 

Free ways only 

Roadway Class 

Local 

Collector 

Major Arterial 

Freeway 

VMT 

34871 4 

2131167 

4987209 

3398732 
San Joaquin County San Joaquin Council of Governments 

Transportation Activity Data 2005 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20. 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

- Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily, 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

8012 0.0455% 

12893 0.0733% 

22710 0.1290% 

100556 0.5714% 

1461924 8.3070% 

1899408 10.7928% 

1586970 9.0175% 

1982419 11.2645% 

1245825 7.0790% 

836253 4.7518% 

1594346 9.0594% 

3182889 18.0858% 

1827060 10.3817% 

1837517 10.4412% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 O.M)OO% 

0 0.0000% 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

Roadway Class 1 VMT d 

Local I 768971 

AM I Hour Peak 

(7-8 AM) 

VMT 70 

264 0.0183% 

1728 0.1201% 

5410 0.3760% 

16048 1.1153% 

145361 10.1020% 

162363 11.2835% 

176417 12.2602% 

169258 11.7627% 

87379 6.0725% 

102594 7.1298% 

127729 8.8766% 

140617 9.7723% 

188395 13.0926% 

115376 8.0181% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

TI Do not include exfernal sateways 769409 

Arterials include expressways, state highways thaf are not freeways and freeway ramps 

Freeways only 

PM 1 Hour Peak 

(5-6 PM) 

VMT 70 

7748 0.4557% 

9408 0.5533% 

9776 0.5750% 

25695 1.51 13% 

181 179 10.6562% 

198652 11.6839% 

166870 9.8146% 

159783 9.3978% 

154238 9.0716% 

121572 7.1504% 

151627 8.9181% 

199310 11.7226% 

216272 12.7202% 

98093 5.7694% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

0 0.0000% 

1757 0.0122% 

7524 0.0520% 

58813 0.4067% 

1135384 7.8521% 

1538393 10.6392% 

1243683 8.6011% 

1653378 11.4344% 

1004208 6.9449% 

612087 4.2331% 

1314990 9.0942% 

2842962 19.6614% 

1422393 . 9.8370% 

1624048 11.2316% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

\Lane Mites I 5171 I 

I Lane Miles 5274 I '2008 Lane Miles 
San Joaquin Council of Governments 

Transportation Activity Data 2020 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daity. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

t 

5 

10 

15 

20 

' 25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

90 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 -22.50 

22.51-27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51-42.50 

42.51-47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 -62.50 

62.51-67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

Do not forget to include int~azonal WT in the local vmt 

I 0 0.0000% I I 77.51 - 82.50 1 0 

0.0000% 0 0.0000% 0 0.0000% 

85 82.51 - 87.50 0 0.0000% 0 0.0000% 0 0.0000% 

Lane Miles 1 5727 

Average Daily 

VMT YO 

17801 0.0741% 

51959 0.2163% 

73439 0.3057% 

165329 0.6881% 

1611550 6.7075% 

2241604 9.3299% 

2306936 9.6019% 

2345456 9.7622% 

1782172 7.4177% 

1842809 7.6701% 

2194857' 9.1354% 

3710942 15.4456% 

3156417 13.1375% 

2524670 10.5081 % 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 1 

0 0.0000% 

24025941 100.0000% 

Do not include external gateways 

Arterials include expressways, state highways that are not freeways and freeway ramps 

Freeways only 

Roadway Class 

Local 

Collector 

Major Arterial 

Freeway 

VMT 

969969 

2502233 

7853470 

12700269 

AM I Hour Peak 

(7-8 AM) 

VMT % 

4886 0.2469% 

20140 1.0177% 

24291 1.2274% 

63993 3.2336% 

153017 7.7320% 

223759 11.3066% 

210642 10.6438% 

2290'14 11.5721% 

165217 8.3484% 

208358 10.5283% 

198481 10.0293% 

241657 12.2109% 

176742 8.9308% 

58822 2.9723% 

0 0.0000% 

1979019 100.0000% 

PM I Hour Peak 

(5-6 PM) 

VMT % 

10510 0.4560% 

19908 0.8638% 

27216 1.1809% 

53315 2.3133% 

208553 9.0491% 

2621 19 11.3733% 

280976 12.1915% 

208338 9.0398% 

227915 9.8892% 

290315 12.5967% 

265440 11.5174% 

216096 9.3764% 

175484 %6142% 

58501 2.5384% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

2304686 100.0000% 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

2405 0.0122% 

11911 0.0603% 

21932 0.1 11 1% 

48021 0.2432% 

1249980 6.3315% 

1755726 8.8932% 

1815318 9.1951% 

1908104 9.6651% 

1389040 7.0359% 

1344136 6.8084% 

1730936 8.7677% 

3253189 16.4783% 

2804191 14.2040% 

2407347 12.1 939% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

19742236 100.0000% 
Stanislaus Council of Governments 

Transportation Activity Data 

2005 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

Note+: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you dn~y have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak pwiods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed dins. ' 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

Roadway Class I VMT I *.=.,=c m -..-a :..- Jude external gateways 

Colle-.-. . , - - - , - - . Major Aderial ( . 6,471.592 Arterials include expressways, state highways that are not freeways and freeway ramps 

Freeway 1 2,842.377 Freeways only I 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.50 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.W - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

67,713 0.6255% 

71.532 0.6608% 

505.539 4.6699% 

198.513 1.8338% 

' 607,252 5.6095% 

1.1 85.647 10.9524% 

793.349 7.3286% 

1,076,841 9.9473% 

2,758,597 25.4826% 

1,707,814 15.7760% 

722,710 6.6761% 

303.635 , 2.8048% 

826,266 7.6327% 

10,825,408 100.0000% 

AM 1 Hour Peak 

VMT Oh 

12,321 1.3682% 

3.690 0.4098% 

43.047 4.7802% 

15.315 1.7007% 

50,691 5.6290% 

75,564 8.3933% 

77.384 8.5932% 

66.610 7.3968% 

229.175 25.4490% 

89,526 9.9415% 

91,208 10.1283% 

48,849 5.4245% 

97.126 10.7855% 

' 900.526 99.9999% 

Lane Miles 1 3,513 

PM 1 Hour Peak 

VMT Oh. 

35.989 3.1349% 

25,747 2.2428% 

73,707 6.4205% 

42,462 3.6988% 

87.062 7.5838% 

91.695 7.9874% 

101,313 8.8252% 

102.221 8.9043% 

286,134 24.9246% 

105,154 9.159896 

98.869 8.6123% 

40,753 3.5499% 

56.894 4.9559% 

1,148,000 100.0001% 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

19.403 0.221 1% 

42,095 0.4796% 

388,785 4.4296% 

140.736 1.6035% 

469.499 5.3493% 

1,018.368 11.6028% 

614,652, 7.0031% 

908,010 10.3455% 

2.243.288 25.5591% 

1,513,134 17.2400% 

532,633 6.0686% 

214.033 2.4386% 

672.246 7.6593% 

- 0.0000% 

- 0.0000% 

- 0.0000% 

- 0.0000% 

- 0.0000% 

87768821 100.000046 
Stanislaus Council of Governments 

Transportation Activity Data 

2020 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

I I Total 1 14.502.068 1 

highways that are 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

121,430 0.8373% 

190,163 1.31 13% 

701,978 4.8405% 

272,643 1.8800% 

888,991 6.1301% 

1,003,902 6.9225% 

1,684,439 11.61 52% 

1,800,638 12.4164% 

4,325,294 29.8254% 

1,563,878 10.783m 

556,434 3.8369% 

279,380 1.9265% 

1 ,I 12,898 7.6741% 

14,502,068 100.0000% 

Do not include external gateways 

Arferials include expressways, state 

Freeways only 

Roadway Class 

Local 

Collector 

Major Arterial 

Freeway 

freeways 

VMT 

584,676 

1,17$084 

8,654,190 

4,090,118 

and 

AM 1 Hour Peak 

VMT % 

18,505 1.6664% 

11,355 1.0226% 

64,326 5.7928% 

25,844 2.3273% 

64,394 5~7989% 

78,700 7.0872% 

11 3,209 10.1 949% 

131,683 11 3585% 

342.21 1 30.81 74% 

11 5,440 10.3958% 

11.1 80 1.0068% 

35,502 3.1 971 % 

98,099 8.8342% 

1 ,I 10,448 100.0000% 

freewc 

Do not forget to include infrazonal VMT in the kcal vmt 

PM 1 Hour Peak 

VMT % 

78,752 5.0896% 

43,626 2.8195% 

96,976 6.2674% 

65,068 4.2052% 

95,354 6.1626% 

130,455 8.431 1% 

142,722 9.2239% 

171,803 i1.1034% 

420,492 27.1 758% 

146,250 9.451 9% 

59,349 3.8356% 

21,556 1.3931 % 

74,902 4.8408% 

1,547,305 100.0000% 

Lane. Miles I 3,794 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

24,173 0.2041% 

135,182 1.1413% 

540,676 4.5649% 

181,731 1.5343% 

729,243 6.1569% 

794,747 6.7099% 

1,428,508 12.0607% 

1,497,152 12.6403% 

3,562,591 30.0785% 

1,302.188 10.9942% 

485,905 4.1 024% 

222,322 1.8770% 

939,897 7.9354% 

11,844,315 1 
Tulare County Association of Governments (TCAG) 

Transportation Activity Data 2005 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Periods - See note below 

10,034.023 

- Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods-available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

lntrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51 - 22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51 - 32.50 

32.51 - 37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 - 47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51 - 62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 

Total 

Do not include ewiernal gateways 

Arterials include expressways, state highways that are not freeways and freeway ramps 

Freeways only 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

I 

Totall 10034023 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT YO 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

Lane Miles 1 4884 Excludes centroid connectors 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT YO 
Tulare County Association of Governments (TCAG) 

Transportation Activity Data 2020 

VMT by Speed Bin 

Model Penbds - See note below 

14,915,553 

Notes: 

Modeled Periods 

Provide modeled periods available from your model. If you only have daily then only provide daily. 

Models with peak and off peak periods should provide them. 

Intrazonal VMT and Speeds 

lntrazonal VMT and speeds shall be included in their respective speed bins. 

EMFAC 

Speed Bin 

Name 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

70 

75 

80 

85 

90 . . 

VMT by Facility Type(Daily Only) 

Average Daily 

VMT % 

4.204 0.0282% 

14,508 0.0973% 

28,340 0.1900% 

802.762 5.3820% 

95,733 0.6418% 

560,433 3.7574% 

1,199,624 8.0428% 

1,820.416 12.2048% 

3,027,767 20.2994% 

1,891,998 12.6847% 

594.479 3.9856% 

2,934.299 19.6727% 

1,940,990 13.0132% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

VMT 

Speed Bins 

Actual 

0.0 - 7.50 

7.51 - 12.50 

12.51 - 17.50 

17.51-22.50 

22.51 - 27.50 

27.51-32.50 

32.51-37.50 

37.51 - 42.50 

42.51 -47.60 

47.61 - 52.50 

52.51 - 57.50 

57.51-62.50 

62.51 - 67.50 

67.51 - 72.50 

72.51 - 77.50 

77.51 - 82.50 

82.51 - 87.50 

87.51 - 92.50 .-.

Total 1 14,915,553 100.0000%1 2,605,235 100.0000%~ 3,528,333 100.0000%~ 8,781.985 100.0000% 

Do not include external gateways 

Arferials mclude expressways, state 

Freeways only 

14,915,553 1 2,605,235 1 3,528.333 1 8,781,985 1 

highways that are 

AM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT Ye 

496 0.0190% 

1.820 0.0699% 

6,140 0.2357% 

144.867 5.5606% 

15.295 0.5871% 

91,064 3.4954% 

210,117 8.0652% 

322,162 12.3660% 

543.898 20.8771% 

322.664 12.3852% 

97,563 3.7449% 

492.289 18.8962% 

356,860 13.6978% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0.0000% 

0.0000% 

0.0000% 

not freeways and freeway 

PM 3 Hour Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

1,354 0.0384% 

7,468 0.21 17% 

10.074 0.2855% 

189.088 5.3591% 

27,931 0.7916% 

174,106 4.9345% 

304.805 8.6388% 

569,148 16.1308% 

640,706 18.1589% 

388,642 11.0149% 

229,310 6.4991% 

616.556 17.4744% 

369,144 10.4623% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0.0000% 

0.0000% 

0.0000% 

ramps 

Off Peak 

(if available) 

VMT % 

2,354 0.0268% 

5,220 0.0594% 

12,127 0.1381% 

468.806 5.3383% 

52,507 0.5979% 

295,263 3.3621% 

684,702 7.7967% 

929.106 10.5797% 

1,843.163 20.9880% 

1,180,693 13.4445% 

267,606 3.0472% 

1,825,453 20.7863% 

1,214,986 13.8350% 

0 0.0000% 

0 0.0000% 

0.0000% 

0.0000% 

0.0000% 

Do not forget to include intrazonal VMT in the local vmt 

l~ane Miles I 51 98 
2007 PMIO Maintenance Plan and Request for Redesignation 

for the 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

Public Comments