alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     1999 1st Quarter 10Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000882288
<NAME>                        Textainer Equipment Income Fund IV
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,149
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                   615
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19
<PP&E>                                         120,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 42,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 85,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,745
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     82,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   85,321
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,312
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               42
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                39
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   39
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>



FRONTIER INSURANCE GROUP, INC          1998 FORM 10-K             EXHIBIT 21(a)


                        LIST OF REGISTRANT'S SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of Registrant's subsidiaries, all of which are
wholly-owned, except as noted.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      State of Jurisdiction
                Name                                    and Incorporation  

<S>                                                         <C>
Frontier Insurance Company                                 New York

Medical Professional Liability Agency, Ltd.                New York

Pioneer Claim Management, Inc.                             New York

Frontier Pacific Insurance Company                        California

Spencer Douglass Insurance Associates                     California

United Capitol Holding Company                             Delaware

United Capitol Insurance Company                           Illinois

Olympic Underwriting Managers, Inc.                        Delaware

Fischer Underwriting Group, Inc.                          New Jersey

Regency Financial Corporation (1)                          Delaware

Regency Insurance Company                               North Carolina

Emrol Premium Finance Company                           North Carolina

Lyndon Financial Corporation                               Missouri

Lyndon Insurance Group, Inc.                               Missouri

Lyndon Property Insurance Company                          Missouri

Lyndon Life Insurance Company                              Missouri

Lyndon Southern Insurance Company                          Louisiana

Lyndon - DFS Warranty Services, Inc. (2)                   Missouri

Gulfco Life Insurance Company                              Louisiana

Lyndon American, Inc.                                      Missouri
</TABLE>



<PAGE>
<PAGE>



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      State of Jurisdiction
                Name                                    and Incorporation  

<S>                                                         <C>
Twin Mercury Life Insurance Company                         Arizona

Acceleration Life Insurance Company                          Ohio

Acceleration National Service Corporation                    Ohio

Lyndon General Agency of Texas, Inc.                         Texas

Dublin International Limited                            Island of Nevis

Environmental and Commercial Insurance Agency, Inc.          Ohio

London and European Title Insurance Services Limited        England

Western Indemnity Insurance Company                          Texas

Surety Bond Connection Agency                                Texas

Agents Bond Connection Agency                                Texas
</TABLE>

    (1) The Company owns 94% interest.
    (2) The Company owns 95% interest.


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                          19,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,017
<PP&E>                                         114,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,348
<BONDS>                                         10,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,610
<SALES>                                         93,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,076
<CGS>                                           72,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    537
<INCOME-TAX>                                       186
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 664 

Designating the week of September 20 through September 26, 2020, as 

‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2020 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH (for herself, Mr. JONES, Mr. BRAUN, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. 

HOEVEN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. WARREN, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. YOUNG, and 

Ms. ERNST) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of September 20 through September 

26, 2020, as ‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Week’’. 

Whereas the last Sunday in September— 

(1) is designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s Day’’ 

under section 111 of title 36, United States Code; and 

(2) was first designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s 

Day’’ under the Joint Resolution entitled ‘‘Joint Resolution designating the last Sunday in September as ‘Gold 

Star Mother’s Day’, and for other purposes’’, approved 

June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895); 

Whereas there is no date dedicated to families affected by the 

loss of a loved one who died in service to the United 

States; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 664 ATS 

Whereas a gold star symbolizes a family member who died in 

the line of duty while serving in the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces, 

through their service, bear the burden of protecting the 

freedom of the people of the United States; 

Whereas the selfless example of the service of the members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces, as well as the sacrifices made by the families of those individuals, inspires 

all individuals in the United States to sacrifice and work 

diligently for the good of the United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

of the Armed Forces and the families of veterans of the 

Armed Forces should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of September 20 

3 through September 26, 2020, as ‘‘Gold Star Fami4 lies Remembrance Week’’; 

5 (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made 

6 by— 

7 (A) the families of members of the Armed 

8 Forces who made the ultimate sacrifice in order 

9 to defend freedom and protect the United 

10 States; and 

11 (B) the families of veterans of the Armed 

12 Forces; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 664 ATS 

1 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe Gold Star Families Remembrance Week 

3 by— 

4 (A) performing acts of service and good 

5 will in their communities; and 

6 (B) celebrating families in which loved 

7 ones made the ultimate sacrifice so that others 

8 could continue to enjoy life, liberty, and the 

9 pursuit of happiness. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

Lakisha Howell,
Plaintiff(s)
Case Number: 1:18cv510
vs.
Judge Susan J. Dlott
The Ohio State Highway Patrol Subdivision,
etal.,
Defendant(s).
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on December 2, 2019 (Doe. 29), to whom this case was
referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and
that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired December 16, 2019,
hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 24) is
GRANTED, that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant Ohio State Trooper Aaron Shade,

and that this case is hereby TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Acca. 1. DE

Judge Susan J. Diklt
United States District Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00219-CV

Janet Denise Stuckey, Appellant

v.

John Stuckey, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-13-002351, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was due on June 4, 2014. On June 13, 2014, this Court notified

appellant that her brief was overdue and that a failure to respond by June 23, 2014, could result

in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or

a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a); 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 24, 2014
2
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

Argued November 3, 2009

Decided January 11, 2010

Before

         FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 09‐2057

PUSHKAR V. POTNIS,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

of the United States,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals.

No. A094‐998‐386

O R D E R

On November 3, 2009, we heard oral argument on Pushkar Potnis’s petition for review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying him asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture.  After argument, on December 28, 2009,

the Board of Immigration Appeals reopened his case and remanded it to an immigration

judge to consider new evidence Potnis had presented.  Potnis has moved this court to

remand consideration of his petition for review to the BIA in light of the reopening of his

case.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 09‐2057 Page 2

Potnis is correct that the BIA’s decision to reopen his case affects our ability to consider

his petition, but instead of remanding his petition to the BIA, we are compelled to dismiss it

for lack of jurisdiction.  Our jurisdiction is premised on the existence of a final order of the

BIA. 8 U.S.C. §1252(a)(1). The BIA’s order to reopen the proceedings in Potnis’s case

“vacates the previous order of deportation or removal and reinstates the previously

terminated immigration procedures.” Orichitch v. Gonzales, 421 F.3d 595, 598 (7th Cir. 2005);

Bronisz v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 632, 637 (7th Cir. 2004).Because the previous order is vacated,

we have no jurisdiction to consider it. Gao v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 728, 730 (7th Cir. 2006). “The

order sought to be reviewed is no more.  Any judicial act while there is no outstanding

order of removal would be advisory.”  Id.  We note that our order dismissing the case does

not foreclose our future consideration of the issues in this petition in the event that Potnis

seeks review of the Board’s determination of his reopened petition. Id.

Accordingly, Potnisʹs petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerMay 1, 2006




22
EXHIBIT 32.1

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


In  connection  with  the  Annual Report of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-K  for  the period ending December 31, 2003, (the
"Report")  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission, I, Robert W.
Weaver,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 12, 2004

                                   By:  /s/ Robert W. Weaver
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   Robert W. Weaver
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (chief executive officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

WCR, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WESTERN CANADA PLATE 

EXCHANGER LTD.,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:18-cv-00278

Related Case No. 3:20-cv-00143

District Judge Michael J. Newman

Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling 

Order. For good cause shown, the Joint Motion (Doc. 79) is hereby GRANTED, and this 

matter shall proceed as follows: 

Discovery Deadline November 4, 2022

Dispositive Motion Deadline December 16, 2022

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Caroline H. Gentry

Caroline H. Gentry

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 3:18-cv-00278-MJN-CHG Doc #: 80 Filed: 09/12/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1012
1 The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1003

___________ Anthony C. Kenney, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, * Eastern District of Arkansas. Social Security Administration, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 2, 2005 Filed: February 7, 2005

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Anthony Kenney (Kenney) appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find the administrative law judge correctly denied benefits because substantial evidence demonstrates Kenney had not ceased to engage in substantial gainful-2- activity for any continuous 12-month period. See 42 U.S.C. § 1382c(a)(3)(A) (individual is disabled for purposes of supplemental security income if he is unable to engage in substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for continuous period of at least 12 months); 20 C.F.R. § 416.920(b) (2004) (claimant is not disabled if he is engaged in substantial gainful activity). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
# I n the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

WILLIAM WICK

, * No. 14

- 1 16 V

* Special Master Christian J. Moran

Petitioner, *

v. * Filed: February 9 , 2015

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine ;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * hearing loss.

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Lawrence Disparti

, Disparti Law Group

, PA, Holiday, FL , for Petitioner;

Lara Englun d

, U.S. Dep ’ t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On February 6 , 2015 , respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning the

petition for compensation filed by William Wick on February 7 , 2014

. In h is

petition, Mr. Wick a llege d that the influenza (“flu”) va ccine , which is contained in

the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which he

received on or about December 11 , 2012

, caused him to develop hearing loss.

Petitioner further alleges that he exper ienced the residual effects of this injury for

more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or

settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his condition.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s hearing

loss or any other injury or his current condition.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as

“Appendix A.” The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as

1 T he E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b),

the party has 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special

master will appear in the document posted on the website.the decision of the Co urt in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum of $ 7,500 .00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner

, William Wick

. This amount represents compensation for all damages

that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B,

the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 14

- 116 V according to this decision

and the attached stipulation. 2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes , at (202) 357

-

6 353

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can exp edite entry of judgment by each

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal

Claims judge.

2Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 5Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 2 of 5Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 3 of 5Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 4 of 5Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 5 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

AARON WARD, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

MARK J. STUCKE, et al., 

Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Case No. 3:18-cv-263 

District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

NOTICE 

 The discovery phase of this case has ended. No discovery motions or other matters 

referred to the undersigned Judicial Officer remain pending. The case is presently set for 

further proceedings, including trial, before United States District Judge Thomas M. Rose. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to note in the record that: 

 1. Referral of this case to the undersigned Judicial Officer has expired; and 

 2. No motions or other matters in this case remain pending before the 

undersigned Judicial Officer. 

October 20, 2020 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 3:18-cv-00263-TMR Doc #: 28 Filed: 10/20/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 277