alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from the financial
statements of MSU Corporation as at and for
the year ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                        JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                   166,040
<SECURITIES>                           2,218,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         245,451
<PP&E>                                   108,647
<DEPRECIATION>                            84,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,572,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  4,646,122
<BONDS>                                2,470,730
<COMMON>                                 165,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                            (2,239,426)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,572,598
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       4,179,203
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              7,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      (3,587,445)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       297,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          291,744
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      291,744
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             291,744
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Summary of Compensation



 Exhibit 10.16 
 Summary of compensation for named executive officers – February 2009 
 In February 2009, the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors established 2009 salary and target bonus applicable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the other named executive officers as follows: 
  

							
	 Named Executive
	  	2009 Base Salary	  	2009 Target Bonus
	 Arthur G. Dauber
	  	$	240,000	  	$	100,000
	 John H. Untereker
	  	$	168,400	  	$	82,500
	 Neal T. Hare
	  	$	176,400	  	$	82,500
	 James J. Steffek
	  	$	176,400	  	$	82,500
	 Charles M. Dauber
	  	$	181,875	  	$	75,000
	 Timothy C. Adams
	  	$	150,000	  	$	30,000

 Actual bonus amounts payable to each executive will be based on the achievement of company and
individual performance goals established for each executive. Targeted performance must be achieved at the 75% level for that component of the bonus to be earned and must be achieved at the 100% level for the full bonus to be earned. Some of each
executive’s individual goals may require a subjective evaluation and judgment with respect to achievement of these goals. Company performance targets range from 50% to 75% of total bonus with individual goals encompassing the remainder. After
the completion of the 2009 fiscal year, the Chief Executive Officer will review each executive’s performance against 2009 company and individual performance goals. Based on this assessment, the CEO will then recommend to the Compensation
Committee what percentage of each executive’s target bonus the executive should receive. The Compensation Committee, without the CEO’s participation, will evaluate the CEO’s performance (and determine his bonus) by reviewing the
CEO’s success in achieving the company and personal performance goals established by the committee for 2009. 
 The executives are also
eligible to receive grants under the 2007 Employee Stock Incentive Plan and are eligible to receive employee benefits generally available to all employees of the Company. 
 John H. Untereker and Charles M. Dauber have employment agreements with the Company. The other executives are “at will” employees.
### Boyd, Christopher From: Sent: Rogers, Bob [Bob.Rogers@shelbycountytn.gov] Friday, April17, 2015 4:19PM To: Holt, Jim; Boyd, Christopher; Keith_Head@deq.state.ms.us; Kenny.Monroe@kimleyhorn.com; Horton, Kate 

### Cc: Zerwekh, Tyler: Elliott_Bickerstaff@deq.state.ms.us; Jerry_Beasley@deq.state.ms.us; Dallas_Baker@deq.state.ms.us Subject: April 24th meeting
This is a reminder and confirmation ofthe meeting location next Friday for our maintenance plan/SIP discussion between our program, Mississippi Air program staff, and local MPO staff. Start time will be 10:30 and we will meet in ouroffice on Jefferson. Specifically, we have reserved the 3'' floor conference room. We will have a conference-capable phone, so ifanyone wishes or needs to call in, the numberto call is (901)222-2776 with 17897# as the access code. Please let me know how manyvehicles to expect so we can reserve parking on our lot. See you next week. Bob Rogers, Manager Pollution Control Shelby County Health Department 814 Jefferson Ave. MemphisTN 38105 (901)222-9599

Bob Rogers, Manager Pollution Control Shelby County Health Department 814 Jefferson Ave. MemphisTN 38105 (901)222-9599 From: Rogers, Bob Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:14AM To: 'Keith_Head@deq.state.ms.us' 

### Cc: Dallas Baker@deq.state.ms.us; Elliott Bickerstaff@deq.state.ms.us; Jerrv Beasley@deq.state.ms.us Subject: RE: Need to change our proposed meeting date. Can we move itto April 20? Great. We'll find a place. It may be our officejustto be sure we can have a conference line. Bob Rogers, Manager Pollution Control Shelby County Health Department 814 Jefferson Ave. MemphisTN 38105 (901)222-9599

1
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 54 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 54

  Making an emergency supplemental appropriation for the fiscal year 
 ending September 30, 2021, to provide funding to Israel for the Iron 
       Dome defense system to counter short-range rocket threats.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2021

  Mr. McCarthy (for himself, Mr. Scalise, Ms. Granger, Mr. Rogers of 
  Alabama, and Mr. McCaul) submitted the following joint resolution; 
which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition 
    to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Making an emergency supplemental appropriation for the fiscal year 
 ending September 30, 2021, to provide funding to Israel for the Iron 
       Dome defense system to counter short-range rocket threats.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sum is 
appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2021, and for 
other purposes, namely:

                         DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

                       Operation and Maintenance

                operation and maintenance, defense-wide

     For an additional amount, $1,000,000,000, to remain available 
until September 30, 2023, which shall be for the Secretary of Defense 
to provide to the Government of Israel for the acquisition, 
enhancement, maintenance, and sustainment of the Iron Dome defense 
system to counter short-range rocket threats: Provided, That nothing 
under this heading may be construed to apply to previously appropriated 
funds for the procurement of Iron Dome: Provided further, That such 
amount is designated by the Congress as an emergency requirement 
pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)(A)(i)).
     This resolution may be cited as the ``Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Resolution, 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
Request for Information Cerious Productions LLC (FAA-2015-3229) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Cerdeiros: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−3229). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition.

 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove 

closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response 

date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by November 19, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

 

FAA Office of Rulemaking 

Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 2:01 PM 

To: mikecerdeiros@gmail.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,441
<SECURITIES>                                    21,292
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         47
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,487
<PP&E>                                           5,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,751
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,047
<SALES>                                             34
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,823
<CGS>                                               17
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,317)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,317)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,317)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### Texas and St. Louis Railway Company v. Eddy.

1. Railroads: *Damages for right of way: Excessive.*

Verdicts for damages for right of way are not set aside for excess, except when they are not supported by proof, or are so excessive as to indicate passion, prejudice, or an incorrect appreciation of the law applicable to-the case.

2. Sauk: *Evidence of value of land.*

The tax assessment of land is not admissible as evidence of its value in. assessing the damages for right of way. It is made for a different purpose and is not a fair criterion of its market value.

APPEAL from *Columbia*Circuit Court.

Hon. C. E. Mitchel, Circuit Judge.

*Tj. A. Byrne*for appellant.

1. The verdict ivas excessive and should be set aside. *39 Ark, 387; <25 lb., 4.9.*

2. The court erred in permitting and compelling witnesses to state in round numbers their opinion of the-damages. See rule *39 Ark., 167.*

3. The assessor’s books were admissible to contradict the evidence of defendant. *8 Nev., 165.*

Smith. J.

The railway company filed its petition to-condemn a right of way, one hundred feet wide, through the de'endant’s farm. The tract consisted of two hundred acres, proved to be worth about §10 per acre. The railroad traversed the cultivated portion of it for the distance-of half a mile. The land actually appropriated was computed to be six acres; but it cut up the remainder into an inconvenient shape, leaving fifteen or eighteen acres south of the railroad in a long narrow strip, of the *average*width of one hundred yards. As the houses and mass of improved land lay to the north, this strip was rendered *528more difficult of access and its value impaired for agricultural purposes.

Railroads Damages for right of way: Excessive.

Evidence of value of land: Tax assessment is not.

The defendant estimated his damage at $550. Another of his witnesses thought the whole tract had been depreciated in value by the construction of the road to the extent of one-third; while one of the petitioner’s own witnesses put the damage at one-fifth of the value of the entire tract. The jury gave $425.

The principal error assigned is in the amount of the recovery. Yerdicts are set aside for this cause only when they are not supported by proof, or when they are so excessive as to indicate passion, prejudice, or an incorrect appreciation of the law applicable to the case. *Ayliff v. Hardy’s Exrs., 25 Ark., 49; Kelly v. McDonald, 39 Ib., 387.*

The assessment of damages in this case awards a liberal compensation to the landowner; but upon the evidence is not shocking to the sense of justice, nor even unreasonably large.

It was no error to exclude from the jury the valuation *of the*same land made by the assessor for purposes of taxation. The determination of value, being fora different purpose, is not a fair criterion of its market value. *Brown v. Providence R. R., 5 Gray, 35.*

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the annual report of Flanders Corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, we hereby certify, solely for the purpose
of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.          The
annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          The
information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |                                                           
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March
 13, 2008 |                                                           
|                      |                                                           
|                      | /s/Robert
Amerson                                         
|                      |                                                           
|                      | Robert
 Amerson                                           
|                      | Chief
 Executive Officer / (Principal Executive Officer)  
|                      |                                                           
|                      | /s/Cully
Bohush                                           
|                      |                                                           
|                      | Cully Bohush                                              
|                      | Chief
 Accounting Officer / (Principal Accounting Officer)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 123 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.123
                                     Agreed to December 15, 2022        

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of H.R. 1437, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall amend the title so as to read: ``Making further 
continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2023, and for other purposes.''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01553]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Initial Review Group; Neurological Sciences and Disorders 
A Study Section.
    Date: February 21-22, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Natalia Strunnikova, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 
3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-0288, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 21, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-01553 Filed 1-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

TAMERA BROWN, et al. 

 Plaintiffs,

 v. 

CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al. 

 Defendants.

: 

: 

: 

:

: 

: 

: 

: 

Case No. 1:18-cv-412 

Judge Susan J. Dlott 

Magistrate Judge Karen Litkovitz 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Defendants Sentinel Police Association and Lieutenant Danita Pettis in her individual 

capacity hereby give notice that Alphonse A. Gerhardstein enters his appearance as lead attorney 

for the Defendants in this action. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Alphonse A. Gerhardstein 

Alphonse A. Gerhardstein (0032053) 

Trial Attorney for Plaintiff 

Janaya Trotter Bratton (0084123) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Gerhardstein & Branch Co. LPA 

441 Vine St., Suite 3400 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

Tel (513) 621-9100 

Fax (513) 345-5543 

agerhardstein@gbfirm.com 

jtbratton@gbfirm.com 

 

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 12 Filed: 11/15/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 262
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on November 15, 2018, a copy of the foregoing pleading was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties for whom counsel has entered an 

appearance by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing 

through the Court’s system. I further certify that a copy of the foregoing pleading and the Notice 

of Electronic Filing has been served by ordinary U.S. mail upon all parties for whom counsel has 

not yet entered an appearance electronically. 

 s/ Alphonse A. Gerhardstein 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 12 Filed: 11/15/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 263
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion (&) 1R  ZKLFK LV

*5$17(' For good cause shown, the briefing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Fees and Costs (&)

1R  is temporarily 67$<('. The parties are 25'(5(' to file a joint status report 

detailing the status of their discussion regarding the fee motion and Defendants’ 

compliance with the Court’s December 16, 2020 order on or before $35,/  . 

Should the parties inform the Court that their discussions have ceased to be productive, the 

Court will reinstate briefing on the fee motion immediately. 

,7,66225'(5('

_____________________ 

&+(/6(<09$6&85$

UNITED STATES 0$*,675$7( JUDGE 

STACIE RAY, 

et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

STEPHANIE McCLOUD, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:18-cv-00272 

Judge: Michael Watson 

Magistrate Judge: Chelsey Vascura 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

V&KHOVH\09DVFXUD

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 90 Filed: 03/26/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 3303
Dmitriy VERNITSKIY and Yavgeniy Vernitskiy, Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, Appellee.

No. 3D17-654

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.