alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON)

MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ET AL.,

)
)
) Case No. 3:18-cv-00295
Plaintiffs, )
) Judge Walter H. Rice
vs. )
)
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., ET AL., a)
)
Defendants. )

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ CONSENT MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

This matter comes before the Court upon the consent motion of Defendants McKesson
Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, and Walgreen Co.
(incorrectly named in the Complaint as Walgreens Corporation) (“Defendants”) for an extension
of time to answer or move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint. For good cause shown, the Motion
is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants shall have until thirty (30) days after
this Court’s ruling on any motion to remand to answer or move to dismiss the Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9-11-18 Le ea

Date UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Judge Walter H. Rice

or

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8130971
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Apria
Healthcare Group Inc. (the company or Apria) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lawrence M. Higby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ LAWRENCE M. HIGBY Lawrence M. Higby
Chief Executive OfficerAugust 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Apria and will be retained by Apria and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of China Sky One Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hao Yu-Bo, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





Date:  April
15, 2009





By:
                /s/ Hao Yu-BoName:
      Hao Yu-BoTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)
Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW Document 149 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW Document 149 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 124 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 124

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 2617.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2022

 Ms. DeLauro submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and in addition to 
the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 2617.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2617, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) Strike all after the enacting clause through page 3, 
        line 19 (the first sections 1 and 2).
            (2) Strike ``Division C'' and all that follows through the 
        end.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Case No. 3:18cr112 

 Plaintiff, : 

v. :

JIMMY L. WEBB, JR., : JUDGE WALTER H. RICE 

 Defendant. : 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

It is the order of this Court that the captioned defendant is NOT to be removed from the 

Montgomery County Jail without the express written permission of the undersigned. 

March 2, 2021 

WALTER H. RICE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: Counsel of record 

United States Marshals Office 

Montgomery County Jail 

Eric Dern 

(tp - per Judge Rice authorization)

Case: 3:18-cr-00112-WHR Doc #: 71 Filed: 03/02/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 201
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FY 1997 Q2
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          32,304
<SECURITIES>                                    11,730
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                       756
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,090
<PP&E>                                          26,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,455
<SALES>                                         49,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,742
<CGS>                                           24,611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (715)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (661)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (132)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (529)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (529)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,509
<SECURITIES>                                     1,175
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,594
<PP&E>                                         864,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                 183,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 807,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,946
<BONDS>                                        273,688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        550
<COMMON>                                           342
<OTHER-SE>                                     203,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   807,494
<SALES>                                        150,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               486,925
<CGS>                                           19,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  421,935<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (7,740)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,585)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (6,291)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,876)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.93)
<FN>
<F1>TOTAL COSTS INCLUDES IMPAIRMENT OF LONG LIVED ASSETS CHARGE OF $33.0 MILLION
AND A RESTRUCTURING CREDIT OF $2.7 MILLION.  (SEE NOTES 2 AND 3 OF NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.)
</FN>


</TABLE>
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1036 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 

1956 to authorize rewards under the Department of 

State’s rewards program relating to information regarding individuals or entities engaged in activities in contravention of United States or United Nations sanctions, 

and for other purposes. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1036 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bassam Barabandi Re5 wards for Justice Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO DEPARTMENT OF STATE REWARDS 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 Subsection (b) of section 36 of the State Department 

9 Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708) is amend10 ed— 

11 (1) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘or’’ after 

12 the semicolon at the end; 

13 (2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period at 

14 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(13) the identification or location of an indi18 vidual or entity that— 

19 ‘‘(A) knowingly, directly or indirectly, im20 ports, exports, or reexports to, into, or from 

21 any country any goods, services, or technology 

22 controlled for export by the United States be23 cause of the use of such goods, services, or 

24 technology in contravention of a United States 

25 or United Nations sanction; or 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1036 RFS

1 ‘‘(B) knowingly, directly or indirectly, pro2 vides training, advice, or other services or as3 sistance, or engages in significant financial 

4 transactions, relating to any such goods, serv5 ices, or technology in contravention of such 

6 sanction.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

STEVE SNYDER-HILL, et al., 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 Civil Action 2:18-cv-736 

 v. Judge Michael H. Watson 

 Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

 

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, 

 

 Defendant. 

 

 

ORDER

On August 9, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a motion to substitute John Doe 18’s widow as 

putative administratrix of the estate of John Doe 18 for Plaintiff John Doe 18 pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a) or, in the alternative, for an extension of time to file a motion to 

substitute, and for permission to file under seal a version of the motion to substitute that reveals 

the identity of John Doe 18’s widow. (ECF No. 82.) At the time the motion was filed, however, 

John Doe 18’s widow had had not yet been appointed as administratrix of his estate. (Id. at 2.) 

Plaintiffs also represent that while Defendant consents to the requests to file the putative 

administratrix’s name under seal and for an extension of time to file a supplemented motion to 

substitute, it does not consent to the request to substitute.1

 (Id.) 

To the extent Plaintiffs seek an extension of time to file a supplemented motion to 

substitute, their motion (ECF No. 82) is GRANTED in that respect only.2

 The parties are 

DIRECTED to confer regarding the status of the state court proceedings seeking to appoint John 

 

1 Defendant, however, did not file an opposition to the motion to substitute. 2 The request to substitute and for leave to file under seal therefore remain pending. 

Case: 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD Doc #: 91 Filed: 10/08/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 979
2 

Doe 18’s widow as administratrix and whether Defendant still opposes the requested 

substitution. The parties are ORDERED to file a joint written status report on these matters, 

including how much time Plaintiffs will need to file a supplemented motion to substitute, no later 

than OCTOBER 15, 2019. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 

Date: October 8, 2019 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case: 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD Doc #: 91 Filed: 10/08/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 980
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/ JOHN P. BYRNESJohn P. Byrnes Chief Executive Officer


November 4, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carmike Cinemas,
Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies
that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard B. Hare                                                                        
|Richard B. Hare                                                                            
|the Senior Vice PresidentFinance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation
|March 8, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

SCHMITT, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.2:18-cv-966

Judge Edmund Sargus, Jr.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Deavers

LAROSE, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________________________/

PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF PETITION

FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Plaintiffs respectfully notify the Court that on February 3, 2020, they filed a Petition for

Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States from the decision of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in favor of Defendant-LaRose in the above-styled

case. See Attachment (affidavit of service of process).

Respectfully submitted,

s/Mark R. Brown 

Mark R. Brown, Trial Counsel

303 East Broad Street

Columbus, OH 43215

(614) 236-6590

(614) 236-6956 (fax)

mbrown@law.capital.edu

Mark G. Kafantaris

625 City Park Avenue

Columbus, Ohio 43206

(614) 223-1444

(614) 300-5123(fax)

mark@kafantaris

Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 73 Filed: 02/04/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 624
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
AND 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                      2,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,447
<PP&E>                                           9,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,810)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,383
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,504
<SALES>                                         29,686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,686
<CGS>                                           25,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    753
<INCOME-TAX>                                       251
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                502
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       502
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
Matthew Lee DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2742

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40174

Summary Calendar

In the Matter of:

DEBRA ANN LOHRI,

Debtor.

DEBRA ANN LOHRI,

Appellant,

versus

SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, L.L.C.,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

No. 4:17-CV-866

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Debra Lohri’s notice of appeal from the bankruptcy court to the district 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40174 Document: 00514750732 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2018
No. 18-40174

2

court arrived at the office of the bankruptcy clerk a few days after the due date. 

She appeals the dismissal of that appeal, contending that we should expand 

the “mailbox rule” to make it available beyond just prisoners. Rule 8002 of the 

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, entitled “Time for filing Notice of 

Appeal,” includes an exception, in subsection (c), for “Appeal by an Inmate 

Confined in an Institution.” 

Lohri is not an inmate, so the usual rule applies to her. In Wright v. Kite 

Brothers, L.L.C. (In re Kite), 710 F. App’x 628, 631−32 (5th Cir. 2018) (per 

curiam), we carefully explained that Rule 8002 is jurisdictional. See Dorsey v. 

U.S. Dep’t of Educ., 870 F.3d 359, 362 (5th Cir. 2017); Smith v. Gartley (In re 

Berman-Smith), 737 F.3d 997, 1003 (5th Cir. 2013).

The judgment of dismissal for want of jurisdiction is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-40174 Document: 00514750732 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1000

<CAPTION>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                              0
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                   40662
<ALLOWANCES>                     2491
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                41098
<PP&E>                          10355
<DEPRECIATION>                   6661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  54784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           33125
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                          100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                      18557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    54784
<SALES>                         83011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                83011
<CGS>                           69805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   69805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                12208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   129
<INCOME-TAX>                       52
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                77
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                       77
<EPS-BASIC>                     .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .01


</TABLE>