alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

Summary of Stakeholder Meetings 

Carissa Cyran 

Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0602. EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0603. and EPA-HQOAR-20 13-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings with stakeholders during the week of January 19. 20 I 5. 

On January 21 , Administrator Gina McCa11hy, Acting Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe. 

and Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and Radiation 

Joseph Goffman met with Greg Abel from Berkshire Hathaway Energy. 

On January 22, Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Radiation Joseph Goffman met with representatives from El ectric Reli ability Council ofTexas. 

Sign-in sheet attached. 

On January 22. Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Radiation Joseph Got'fman met with the Midcontinent States Environment and Energy 

Regulators. a multi-state collaborative group including representatives from utilities. states. and 

non-governmental organizations to discuss compliance options. 

Internet Address (URL> • hUp /lwww epa gov 

Rec ycled/Rec yclable • Pron1ed Wtlh Vegetable 0• Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer Process Chlo11ne Free Recycled Paper 
Date: Jf'"' )~ . _:ol ..:;-

Meeting: (i;c..C o \ 

Rule(s) Discussed: ( I ~) 

Written Materials? Ye~ 

Name 

. r~,J N1 c .:L.v 1'< t2-C 

~M f\1\o ~c~ 

[Jt'J 8o~L.;. a rrei/\ Lc..~i.er 

g[~ 

1,·l\~ 

-iN~ h. 

I 

f1,3 k 

'fJ(~ Kc 

Mt# Cl~~ 

L -

Organization Phone Number 

~Rco.--r- 5()_ b?l (,,.7 

Ei<co7 ~ ( z_ 2 2 ~ 7c ( \ 

~fC..U>/ s-r<- :LZ.> ~17' 

ERcc:>l ·- ~ d ;J'-18'- 0s 7~ 

I I 

-

I 

- l 

I 
EPA Staff Usc Only 

Summary of Relevant. Factual Information Received: 

. l)vJ Ok r=l~ J, _I'VU J ~Gd 0 ( OC:,L I 

• CPP Cul~~'>(./j 

{ (/\..-

• 

• 

•
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 21 1 . J ERRY D. PARRI S v . THE STATE.

J erry D. Parri s ap peal s fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s Au g u s t 1 9

, 2 0 15

, o rd er d en y i n g

h i s m o t i o n fo r reco n s i d erat io n o f i t s d en i al o f h i s am en ded ex t rao rd i n ary m o t i o n fo r

n ew t ri al

. Parri s fi l ed b o t h a n ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

, s ee Cas e No

. A1 6 D0 05 4 , an d t h i s d i rect ap p eal , s eek i n g rev iew o f t he s am e t ri al co u rt o rd er.

W e d i s m i s s ed Parri s ’ s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal o n Oct o b er 9

, 2 0 1 5,

co n cl u d in g t h at we l ack ed ju ri s d i ct i o n b ecau s e Parri s i s n o t en t i t l e d to a s eco n d

ap p eal fro m h i s cri m i n al co n v i ct i o n an d b ecau s e an o rd er den y i n g a m o t i o n fo r

reco n s i d erat i on i s n o t s u bject t o ap p el lat e rev i ew. See Ja cks o n v. S t a t e , 2 7 3 Ga. 3 2 0

(5 4 0 SE2 d 6 1 2 ) (2 0 0 1 ); Bel l v. Co h r a n , 2 44 Ga. A p p

. 5 10

, 51 1 (5 3 6 SE2 d 1 8 7 )

(2 0 0 0). Fo r t h e s am e reas on s , w e al so l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n to co n s id er t he in s t an t d i rect

ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/05/2015 November 05, 2015
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph relating to
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated September 2, 1996
(except for Notes A-1 and P, as to which the date is October 3, 1996),
accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the
Annual Report of VTX Electronics Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
1996.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statement of VTX Electronics Corp. on Form S-8 (Registration No.
33-86264).




GRANT THORNTON LLP


Melville, New York
November 4, 1996
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached
as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the
Report.
 Dated: August 10, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Alberto R. Santa InesAlberto R. Santa InesChief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TAMPA DIVISION

BARBARA HAMBLEN and HERBERT

HAMBLEN,

Plaintiffs

v. Case No. 8:17-cv-1613-T-33TGW

DAVOL, INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants

Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.’s Motion to Stay All

Proceedings (Doc. # 64), which was filed on April 24, 2018. 

The request for a stay is predicated upon proceedings before

the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. 

In the 3.01(g), M.D. Fla. Certificate of Conferral, Defendants

indicated that Plaintiffs oppose the relief requested. On

April 30, 2018, Defendants filed a Notice of Supplemental

Authority (Doc. # 65) referring to recently stayed cases

involving Bard’s hernia products. 

Thereafter, Plaintiffs filed their “Consent to Defendants

Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.’s Motion to Stay All

Proceedings.” (Doc. # 66). Specifically, Plaintiffs state:

“Upon further review of the facts and claims relating to this

case and the highly probable inclusion of the Bard® Composix®

Case: 2:18-cv-00919-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 67 Filed: 05/01/18 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 2372
Kugel® Hernia Patch in the newly requested MDL, Plaintiffs

AGREE with the GRANTING of a Motion to Stay All Proceedings.”

(Id. at 3). In the interest of judicial economy, this Court

stays this matter until such time as the Panel has

dispositively ruled as to whether this case will be

transferred to consolidated multidistrict litigation. 

A stay pending a consolidation and transfer decision by

the JPML serves the primary purposes of the multidistrict

litigation device, which is to “eliminate duplicative

discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings . . . and

conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the

judiciary.” In re Cal. Retail Nat. Gas & Elec. Antitrust

Litig., 150 F. Supp. 2d 1383, 1384 (J.P.M.L. 2001). In so

staying this case, this Court is mindful of its broad

discretion over the manner in which it manages the cases

before it, Chrysler Int’l Corp. v. Chemaly, 280 F.3d 1358,

1360 (11th Cir. 2002), and finds that the stay is reasonable. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

1. Defendants Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.’s Motion to

Stay All Proceedings (Doc. # 64) is GRANTED. 

2. The Clerk is directed to STAY AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE

this case until such time as the Panel has dispositively

-2-

Case: 2:18-cv-00919-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 67 Filed: 05/01/18 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 2373
ruled as to whether this case will be transferred to 

consolidated multidistrict litigation.

3. The parties shall immediately inform the Court when the

Panel has made its final ruling.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 1st

day of May, 2018.

-3-

Case: 2:18-cv-00919-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 67 Filed: 05/01/18 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 2374
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 572 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the report of the Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention entitled ‘‘Guidance for Implementing the Opening 

Up America Again Framework’’ be released immediately. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2020 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the report of the 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention entitled 

‘‘Guidance for Implementing the Opening Up America 

Again Framework’’ be released immediately. 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the 

2 report of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

3 entitled, ‘‘Guidance for Implementing the Opening Up 

4 America Again Framework’’, should be released to the 

5 public immediately, in the form originally approved by the 

6 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, without politVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:39 May 13, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR572.IS SR572

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 572 IS 

1 ical censorship by the White House or the Office of Man2 agement and Budget. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NO. 12-09-00211-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SEAN EWALT, § APPEAL FROM THE 

APPELLANT

V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. After a guilty plea, Appellant was

convicted of theft of property having a value of more than $50 but less than $500. Punishment was

assessed at confinement for sixty days. Thereafter, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. 

To be sufficient to invoke the appellate court’s full jurisdiction, the notice of appeal filed by

an appellant in a criminal case must bear the trial court’s certification of the appellant’s right to

appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The

certification should be part of the record when notice is filed, but may be added by timely

amendment or supplementation. Id. Appellant’s notice of appeal does not include the required

certification.

On July 16, 2009, this court notified Appellant through his counsel, pursuant to Texas Rules

of Appellate Procedure 25.2 and 37.1, that the notice of appeal does not include the trial court

certification. The notice also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or

before July 27, 2009, the clerk’s record was amended to include the required certification.

The deadline for responding to this court’s notice has expired, and the clerk’s record has not

been amended to show Appellant’s right to appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered July 31, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

CORY J. HOLMES, § 

 § No. 378, 2016 

 Defendant Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court 

 § of the State of Delaware 

 v. § 

 § Cr. ID No. 0901020659 (N) 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

 Submitted: November 17, 2017 

 Decided: January 30, 2018 

Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

 ORDER 

This 30th day of January 2018, after consideration of the parties’ briefs and 

the record on appeal, we conclude that the Superior Court’s summary dismissal of 

the appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief should be affirmed. The 

Superior Court did not err when determining that the appellant’s ineffective 

assistance of postconviction counsel claims were subject to the procedural 

requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2).*

 

* See, e.g., Durham v. State, 2017 WL 5450746, at *2 (Del. Nov. 13, 2017) (holding that appellant 

had to satisfy requirements of Rule 61(d)(2) to avoid summary dismissal of second postconviction 

motion, even if he did not have a previous opportunity to raise ineffective assistance of 

postconviction counsel claims (citing Younger v. State, 580 A.2d 552, 554 (Del. 1990))); Coles v. 

State, 2017 WL 3259697 (Del. July 31, 2017); Jones v. State, 2017 WL 4535974 (Del. Oct. 10, 

2017). 
2 

 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE OURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PowerSecure International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  August 6, 2009
    /s/ Sidney HintonSidney HintonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case: 2:18-cv-00745-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 5 Filed: 08/01/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 23
Case: 2:18-cv-00745-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 5 Filed: 08/01/18 Page: 2 of 4 PAGEID #: 24
Case: 2:18-cv-00745-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 5 Filed: 08/01/18 Page: 3 of 4 PAGEID #: 25
Case: 2:18-cv-00745-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 5 Filed: 08/01/18 Page: 4 of 4 PAGEID #: 26
Key Project Personnel

Robert Malcomson, MWH

Robert P. Stevens, P.E., Project Integration, Inc.

David Kirby – Project Integration, Inc.

Charles Busch – John Deere, Des Moines Works

Tonya Duren – Project Integration, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

TERESA TOPE,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.,

 Defendant.

Case No.: 2:18-cv-00504

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Teresa Tope (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. 

(“Defendant”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate to 

the dismissal of all of Plaintiff’s claims in this action against Defendant WITH PREJUDICE, 

with each party to bear its own costs and fees.

JOINTLY SUBMITTED BY:

/s/Jeremy Teaberry (with permission)

Jeremy R. Teaberry

BALLARD SPAHR LLP

1735 Market Street, 51st Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19103-7599

T: (215) 864-8370

F: (215) 864-8999

E: teaberryj@ballardspahr.com

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

/s/ Peter Cozmyk

Peter Cozmyk

COZMYK LAW OFFICES, LLC

6100 Oak Tree Blvd., Ste. 200

Independence, OH 44131

P: (877) 570-4440

F: (216) 485-2125

E: Pcozmyk@cozmyklaw.com

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 2:18-cv-00504-GCS-CMV Doc #: 15 Filed: 06/04/19 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 46
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 4th day of June 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing 

Stipulation of Dismissal using the CM/ECF System, which will notify all registered parties.

/s/Jeremy Teaberry (with permission)

Jeremy R. Teaberry

BALLARD SPAHR LLP

1735 Market Street, 51st Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19103-7599

T: (215) 864-8370

F: (215) 864-8999

E: teaberryj@ballardspahr.com

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

 

 

/s/ Peter Cozmyk 

Peter Cozmyk

COZMYK LAW OFFICES, LLC

6100 Oak Tree Blvd., Ste. 200

Independence, OH 44131

P: (877) 570-4440

F: (216) 485-2125

E: Pcozmyk@cozmyklaw.com

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 2:18-cv-00504-GCS-CMV Doc #: 15 Filed: 06/04/19 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 47
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

TERESA TOPE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAPITAL ONE BANK(USA), N.A.,

Defendants.

Case No: 2:18-cv-00504

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Teresa Tope (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., 

(“Defendant”), having filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal and the Court being otherwise 

sufficiently advised, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant are DISMISSED 

with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney’s fees. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: _______________ _____________________

Chelsey M. Vascura

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 2:18-cv-00504-GCS-CMV Doc #: 15 Filed: 06/04/19 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 48
Case 1:01-cv-00130-SAS-TSH Document 51-3 Filed 12/05/2003 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 22
  
  
  Subsidiaries of Raytech Corporation               Incorporated
  
  Advanced Friction Materials Company                 Michigan
  44600 Merrill Road
  Sterling Heights, MI 48314                          
  
  Allomatic Products Company                          Delaware
  609 E. Chaney Street
  Sullivan, IN 47882
  
  Automotive Composites Company                       Delaware
  44650 Merrill Road
  Sterling Heights, MI 48314
  
  Raybestos Aftermarket Products Company              Delaware
  964 East Market Street
  Crawfordsville, IN 47933            
  
  Raybestos Friction Products (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.      China
  Xiang Yang Road, Suzhou New District
  215011 Suzhou, China
  
  Raybestos Industrie-Produkte GmbH                   Germany
  Industriestrasse, 7
  D-54497 Morbach, Germany  
  
  Raybestos Products Company                          Delaware
  1204 Darlington Avenue
  Crawfordsville, IN 47933
  
  Raybestos Reibtechnik GmbH                          Germany
  Quettingerstrasse, 220
  D-51381 Leverkusen 3, Germany
  
  Raybestos U.K. Ltd.                                 England
  16, Spindus Road
  Speke
  Liverpool L24 1YA, England
  
  Raytech Composites Europe GmbH                      Germany
  Industriestrasse, 7
  D-54497 Morbach, Germany  
  
  Raytech Composites, Inc.                            Delaware
  Suite 295, Four Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484
  
  Raytech Europe, Inc.                                Delaware
  Suite 295, Four Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484
  
  Raytech Powertrain, Inc.                            Delaware
  Suite 295, Four Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ARSHAD AL-SABUR, on behalf of himself 

and those similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ADS ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-957 

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE VASCURA 

ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION 

 For good cause shown, the parties’ Stipulation to conditionally certify the defined group of 

current and former employees as a collective action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) is GRANTED. 

The parties’ request to delay notice to the putative class members while the parties explore whether 

a resolution is possible is GRANTED. The parties are ordered to explore a potential resolution of 

this matter and work cooperatively as set forth in the Stipulation. In accordance with the parties’ 

Stipulation, the statute of limitations is tolled from October 22, 2018 until the parties’ mediation. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Exhibit 21

Carmike Cinemas, Inc.

List of Subsidiaries



|                                |  |                        |  |         |  
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------- | -
|Subsidiary                      |  | State of Incorporation |  | % Owned |  
|                                |  |                       
|Eastwynn Theatres, Inc.         |  | Alabama                |  | 100     | %
|George G. Kerasotes Corporation |  | Delaware               |  | 100     | %
|GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc.      |  | Indiana                |  | 100     | %
|GKC Michigan Theatres, Inc.     |  | Delaware               |  | 100     | %
|GKC Theatres, Inc.              |  | Delaware               |  | 100     | %
|Military Services, Inc.         |  | Delaware               |  | 100     | %
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998 
<CASH>                                            28,390 
<SECURITIES>                                     932,936 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     31,614 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0 
<INVENTORY>                                            0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0 
<PP&E>                                                 0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,236,472 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0 
<BONDS>                                          138,500 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0 
<COMMON>                                           3,914 
<OTHER-SE>                                       610,008 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     613,922 
<SALES>                                                0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  99,730 
<CGS>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     46,705 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (6,389)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 4,062 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   55,352 
<INCOME-TAX>                                      15,600 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               39,752 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      39,752 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.06 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.01 
                                                         
                                                         

</TABLE>
**Appendix –**  **C** Monthly Maintenance Log
UAS: Date Issue

Discovered Date Issue

Addressed Issue

(Description/Maintenance Conducted) Maintenance

Performed by: Print and Sign