alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix E 

MOVES Modeling 

Documentation and IAC 

minutes 

(MOVES files located on included disk) 

DRAFT MINUTES 

Interagency Consultation 

Alabama Transportation Conformity

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Monday, April 19, 2010

2:00p.m. – 4:00 p.m. CST

----------------------------------------------AGENDA--------------------------------------------------------- 

1. Introductions 

2. Approval of March 8, 2010 meeting minutes 

3. Discuss the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (ADEM) 

4. Open Discussion 

------------------------------------------DISCUSSION SUMMARY --------------------------------------

1. Introductions 

2. Approval of March 8, 2010 meeting minutes 

3. Discuss the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (ADEM) 

Mr. Harry He with RPC had a series of questions for ADEM. 

a. Mr. He asked about the 25% margin applied to the Mobile Source 

Emissions budget numbers. Ms. Lisa Cole with ADEM responded 

that the 25% was chosen based on precedent and asked Mr. He if 

there was a need to increase the percent safety margin contributed to 

the Mobile Source Emissions budget numbers. Mr. He said no. 

b. Mr. He asked about the base years for the various NAAQS that 

budgets had been set for. Ms. Cole stated that the base year for the 

annual standard and the ozone standard was 2002. The base year 

for the 2008 24hr PM2.5 NAAQS would have been set by guidance. 

c. Mr. He voiced his concern that we have budgets set by Mobile6, but 

will be running MOVES to establish conformity with those budgets. 

He asked about resetting the budgets with MOVES. Ms. Cole asked 

to table that discussion so that some comparisons could be made to 

determine the need. 

 Ms. Cole asked each agency to state if they approved or disapproved of 

the proposed 24hr PM2.5 motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2024 for 

NOX and PM2.5. 

 ADEM: approved 

 ALDOT: approved 

 JCDH: approved 

 RPCGB: approved 

 FHWA-AL: approved 

 EPA R4: approved 

4. Open Discussion 

The next IAC call will be held on May 10, 2010, at 2PM. 

ADEM:

 Tracy Anderson 

; Lisa Cole 

; Anthony Smiley 

 Lisa Hicks 

; Dale Hurst 

 Amanda Carter 

 Sabrina Rog 

 Marcelle McCloud 

; Chris Howard 

ALDOT:

 Natasha Clay 

 Alfedo Acoff 

 Kathy Ann Bolling 

 Lance Taylor 

 Jim Doolin 

 Bill Couch 

; Sandra Bonner 

 Adam Promesse 

; Victor Jordan 

 Brian Fair 

 Kimberly Obradovich 

JCDH:

 Jason Howanitz 

; Matt Lacke 

 Sam Bell 

 Dave Wootton 

RPCGB:

 Bill Foisey 

; Harry He 

; Darrell Howard 

 Scott Rumble 

; Mike Kaczorowski 

FHWA-AL:

; David Harris 

 Lynne Urquhart 

 Lynne Heisler 

U.S. EPA Region 4:

; Amanetta Somerville 

 Stacey Harder 

 Lynorae Benjamin 

 Dianna Smith
EXHIBIT 31.1
    Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
          Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      I, Richard B. Stuart, Chief Executive Officer of Comet Technologies,
Inc. (the Registrant") certify that:

      1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the
Registrant;

      2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

      3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

      4.  The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:

          a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

      5.  The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
controls; and

     6.  The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 12, 2004            /s/ Richard B. Stuart
                                Richard B. Stuart, Chief Executive Officer
#### Andrew A. Anderson v. Edward Kennedy.

*Specific performance.*

Suit for specific performance was brought against one who had agreed to convey, but refused to execute a deed on the ground that his title *468was subject to a reservation of mineral rights of which complainant-knew, but he himself did not, at the time of making the agreement,, and that complainant had told him that it was not necessary to expressly except a certain easement that was appurtenant to his homestead. It was not shown that complainant had acted fraudulently. Complainant consented to accept performance in precise accordance with defendant’s maximum claims, and to take a deed reserving the easement and excepting the right to minerals, and a decree was made accordingly, without costs to either party. *Held,*that defendant could not complain.

Appeal from Marquette. (Grant, J.)

Oct. 4.

Oct. 10.

Specific PERFORMANCE. Defendant appeals.

Affirmed.-

*E. E. Osborn*for complainant.

*W. P. Mealy*for defendant.

Gkaves, O. J.

The defendant agreed in writing to convey a strip of land to the complainant for $350. The terms were unconditional. The complainant paid the consideration and demanded a conveyance. The defendant refused to give a deed, and complainant filed this bill to compel specific performance.

The defendant claimed in his answer that it was verbally understood at the time of the written contract that a certain passage-way appurtenant to his homestead should be excepted. He also claimed that his holding was subject to a reservation of minerals, and that he was not aware of this fact at the time of the agreement. He further contended that complainant represented that no mention was necessary, in the writing, of the reservation of the passage-way, and further, that he himself was ignorant that his title was subject to a reservation of minerals, although the complainant was aware of it and did not suggest it.

An argumentáis made to show that the complainant acted in bad faith and took a fraudulent advantage; but this is not borne out by the evidence. *We*discover no marks of fraud whatever. The complainant made no surrender in regard to the accuracy of his own version of thé facts, but he consented to waive his rights under the contract as written *469.-and to accept performance in precise accordance with the •maximum claims of the defendant. He consented to take •a deed with the fullest reservation in relation to the stairway and subject to an ample exception of the right to minerals, and the court made a decree in conformity with .this offer of complainant and gave costs to neither party.

The defendant has no cause to complain. On the facts, its he admits them, the complainant was at least entitled to all the relief granted, and we are inclined to think he might have insisted on something more.

The decree is affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
#### Maria JUNCO or Dona M. Junco, a/k/a Maria Paz Sacaluga, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 14998.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 19, 1965.

Decided April 12, 1965.

Robert Goodman, Paterson, N. J., for petitioner.

Mema B. Marshall, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.

Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the administrative agency that petitioner should be deported was based on reasonable, substantial and probative evidence; it was neither arbitrary, capricious nor violative of procedural due process. The decision will be affirmed. Bufalino v. Holland, 277 F.2d 270 (3 Cir. 1960), cert. den. 364 U.S. 863, 81 S.Ct. 103, 5 L.Ed.2d 85 (1960).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 3472-024]

                    On December 3, 2021, Aspinook Hydro, LLC. submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) evidence of its application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (Connecticut DEEP), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to section 401 of the Clean Water Act [1]                                          and section 4.34(b)(5), 5.23(b), 153.4, or 157.22 of the Commission's regulations,[2]                                          a state certifying agency is deemed to have waived its certifying authority if it fails or refuses to act on a certification request within a reasonable period of time, which is one year after the date the certification request was received. Accordingly, we hereby notify the Connecticut DEEP of the following:                

*Date that Connecticut DEEP Received the Certification Request:*                     December 3, 2021.                

If Connecticut DEEP fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before December 3, 2022, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: January 24, 2022.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 4.34(b)(5)/5.23(b)/153.4/157.22.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-01753 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE NO: 1:18-CR-000109

Plaintiff, JUDGE COLE

vs.

AKHLIDDIN KALONOV MOTION TO MODIFY PROBATION

RESTRICTIONS

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Now comes the Defendant, AKHLIDDIN KALONOV, through his attorneys L. 

PATRICK MULLIGAN AND ASSOCIATES, and hereby moves this Court for an Order 

modifying the conditions/restrictions of probation in order to permit Mr. Kalonov to continue his 

current employment and travel out of state.

A Memorandum in Support is attached.

Respectfully Submitted,

/S/ L. Patrick Mulligan

L. PATRICK MULLIGAN of

L. PATRICK MULLIGAN 

& ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

Supreme Court No. 0016118

225 West Court Street

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

(513) 421-9790

(513) 421-0206 fax

patrickmulligan@patrickmulligan.com

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 273 Filed: 11/03/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1901
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT

MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT:

As this Court is keenly aware, Mr. Kalonov recently obtained his CDL driver's license and 

obtained full time employment as an over the road truck driver with Felix Transport, Inc. In that 

job he drives an eighteen wheeler with a flat-bed trailer and delivers steel coils as well as heavy 

equipment including some military items such as armored vehicles and tanks.

On November 2, 2022, Mr. Kalonov appeared before this Court for sentencing and was 

granted probation. Because he resides approximately an hour west of Philadelphia, this Court 

ordered that probation be transferred to his home state of Pennsylvania. Upon meeting with his 

probation officer, he was informed that he is not permitted to leave the state of Pennsylvania while 

on probation. Undersigned counsel respectfully requests an order which eliminates that restriction 

and specifically allows Mr. Kalonov to maintain his current employment.

Respectfully Submitted,

/S/ L. Patrick Mulligan

L. PATRICK MULLIGAN of

L. PATRICK MULLIGAN 

& ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

Supreme Ct. #0016118

225 West Court Street

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

(513) 4219790

(513) 421-0206 fax

patrickmulligan@patrickmulligan.com

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was delivered to the U.S. Attorney’s office on 

the same day as filing via electronic filing.

/S/ L. Patrick Mulligan

L. PATRICK MULLIGAN

Attorney for Defendant

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 273 Filed: 11/03/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1902
AO 442 (Rev 11/11) Arrest Warrant filed

RICHARD W WAcn

ILhKK Ui

United States District Court im jui 25 pm 3:25

for the

Southern District of Ohio

COURT -tOUTHtRN DIST OHin

'•vest OIV CIMnNNATl

United States ofAmerica

V.

SETH NEZAT,

a/k/a "Andrew Johnson," a/k/a "Andrew Butler,"

a/k/a "Jason," a/k/a "Kyle Walker"

Defendant

Case No. 1:18-cr-00109(12)

-a u'> cr

*•". -• ~T:' •••

ARREST WARRANT

To: Any authorized law enforcement officer

OD

^ c:0-- 3»" r C> -TU rv?lL-

-o

zs.

CO

• '':szn]

; , -ilZ ' ' • 'v.,

c.At

YOUARECOMMANDED to arrest and bring beforea United States magistrate judge without unnece'S^iy delay O';?

(nante ofperson to be arrested) SETH NEZAT

who is accused of an offense or violation based on the following document filed with the court:

^ Indictment • Superseding Indictment • Information • Superseding Information • Complaint

• Probation Violation Petition O Supervised Release Violation Petition •Violation Notice • Order of the Court

This offense is briefly described as follows:

Date: 7/25/2018

18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) - Conspiracy to Participate in Racketeering Activity

[SEE ATTACHED INDICTMENT]

Issuing officer's signal

Richard W. Nagel, Clerk, U.S.

Printtd mane and title

City and state: CINCINNATI, OHIO

Return

This I ito warrant waiioitv was wo received iwvwivwu onwii fdajej luutv/ I ^ i * 8^^ ,

i andtiu the iiiw personwiwii was arrested asivatwu on(date) fuuiK/

(cil)- and stale) pT UJCtR. to Cte^c.i &/\i .

Date: T).orr;

Arresting officer's signature

A• /.oPTTS QcfeMPrinted name and title

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 93 Filed: 04/01/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 560
#### Diana Jean VANDERKAMP et al. v. STATE of Arkansas

706 S.W.2d 396

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered April 14, 1986

*James E. Davis,*for appellants.

*Steve Clark,*Att’y Gen., by: *Theodore Holder,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The appellants have filed a motion for a rule to require the Clerk to file the record in this case. It appears that the record was tendered a day late. The appellants’ attorney, James E. Davis, accepts full responsibility for the delay.

This is a sufficient reason for accepting the record. See our per curiam opinion of February 5, 1979. 265 Ark. 964. The motion is accordingly granted.

A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.
Exhibit 10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

CONSENT, AGREEMENT AND AFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY AND PLEDGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT 

Each of the undersigned Guarantors hereby consents to the terms of the foregoing Amendment and agrees that the terms of the Amendment shall not impair or
limit in any way its obligations and liabilities under any Loan Document (as such Loan Documents are amended or otherwise expressly modified by the Amendment), all of which obligations and liabilities shall remain in full force and effect and each
of which is hereby reaffirmed (as amended or otherwise expressly modified by the Amendment). The Guarantors hereby confirm that the security interests and Liens granted pursuant to the Loan Documents continue to secure the Obligations (including the
Local Credit Facility Obligations), as such Obligations may be modified pursuant to the foregoing Amendment, and that such security interests and Liens remain in full force and effect. 

 

			
	JARDEN CORPORATION
	By: /s/ John E. Capps                            
	Name: John E. Capps
	Title: Executive Vice President – Administration, General Counsel and Secretary
	
	ALLTRISTA PLASTICS LLC
	AMERICAN HOUSEHOLD, INC.
	AUSTRALIAN COLEMAN, INC.
	BICYCLE HOLDING, INC.
	BRK BRANDS, INC.
	CC OUTLET, INC.
	COLEMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC
	COLEMAN WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
	ENVIROCOOLER, LLC
	FIRST ALERT, INC.
	HEARTHMARK, LLC
	HOLMES MOTOR CORPORATION
	JARDEN ACQUISITION I, LLC
	JARDEN ZINC PRODUCTS, LLC
	JT SPORTS LLC
	K-2 CORPORATION
	KANSAS ACQUISITION CORP.
	L.A. SERVICES, INC.
	LASER ACQUISITION CORP.
	LEHIGH CONSUMER PRODUCTS LLC
	LIFOAM HOLDINGS, LLC
	LIFOAM INDUSTRIES, LLC
	LIFOAM PACKAGING SOLUTIONS, LLC
	LOEW-CORNELL, LLC
	MARKER VOLKL USA, INC.
	MARMOT MOUNTAIN, LLC
	MIKEN SPORTS, LLC
	NIPPON COLEMAN, INC.
	OUTDOOR SPORTS GEAR, INC.
	OUTDOOR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
	PENN FISHING TACKLE MFG. CO.










			
	PURE FISHING, INC.
	QMC BUYER CORP.
	QUICKIE HOLDINGS, INC.
	QUICKIE MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
	QUOIN, LLC
	RAWLINGS SPORTING GOODS COMPANY, INC.
	REXAIR HOLDINGS, INC.
	REXAIR LLC
	SEA STRIKER, LLC
	SHAKESPEARE COMPANY, LLC
	SHAKESPEARE CONDUCTIVE FIBERS, LLC
	SI II, INC.
	SITCA CORPORATION
	SUNBEAM AMERICAS HOLDINGS, LLC
	SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC.
	THE COLEMAN COMPANY, INC.
	THE UNITED STATES PLAYING CARD COMPANY
	THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC.
	USPC HOLDING, INC.
	 YANKEE CANDLE INVESTMENTS LLC

		
	By:	 	 /s/ John E. Capps

	Name:	 	John E. Capps
	Title:	 	Vice President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./ C.R. BARD, 

INC. POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA

MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION 

NOTICE

 Case No. 2:18-md-2846

 JUDGE EDMUND A SARGUS, JR. 

 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

This notice relates to: ALL CASES.

TAKE NOTICE that a proceeding in this case has been set for the place, date, and time set forth 

below:

Place: United States District Court 

 Joseph P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse GoToMeeting

85 Marconi Boulevard December 2, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. 

 Columbus, Ohio 43215 

TYPE OF PROCEEDING: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE via GoToMeeting

(This conference is for defense counsel and PSC attorneys.)

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATE: October 4, 2022

 /s / Christin M. Werner 

(By) Christin M. Werner, Deputy Clerk

 

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 673 Filed: 11/04/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 8085
----

----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

| 1)   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April      12, 2008 | /s/      Albert Aimers       |
|---------------------|------------------------------|
|                | Albert      Aimers           |
|                | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                |                         |
|                |                         |
| April      12, 2008 | /s/Manu      Ohri            |
|                | Manu      Ohri               |
|                | Chief      Financial Officer |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135078 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135078 

 COA: 279639 

Allegan CC: 05-014124-FH 

JEFFREY SLADE TAFIL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case to the trial court for resentencing regarding 

OV 2. 

l0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2008 

 Clerk