alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, A. Bradley Gabbard, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metretek Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) *[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 

 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  May 15, 2006 /s/ A. Bradley Gabbard   A. Bradley Gabbard   Executive Vice President and Chief
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

<Table>
<Caption>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                         JURISDICTION
------------------                                         ------------
<S>                                                        <C>
J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company                       Colorado
J.D. Edwards World Source Company                          Colorado
J.D. Edwards Holdings Inc.                                 Colorado
J.D. Edwards Company Pty. Ltd.                             Australia
J.D. Edwards Australia Pty. Ltd.                           Australia
J.D. Edwards Austria GmbH                                  Austria
J.D. Edwards & Company Foreign Sales, Inc.                 Barbados
J.D. Edwards Belgium N.V./S.A.                             Belgium
J.D. Edwards Brasil Limitada                               Brazil
J.D. Edwards Canada Ltd.                                   Canada
J.D. Edwards France SA                                     France
J.D. Edwards Deutschland GmbH                              Germany
J.D. Edwards (Hong Kong) Limited                           Hong Kong
J.D. Edwards Europe Ltd.                                   Ireland
J.D. Edwards Italia S.p.A.                                 Italy
J.D. Edwards (Japan) K.K.                                  Japan
J.D. Edwards de Mexico y Compania S. en N.C. de C.V.       Mexico
J.D. Edwards New Zealand Ltd.                              New Zealand
J.D. Edwards International B.V.                            Netherlands
J.D. Edwards Netherlands B.V.                              Netherlands
J.D. Edwards (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.                      Singapore
J.D. Edwards S.A. (Proprietary) Limited                    South Africa
J.D. Edwards (Korea), Inc.                                 South Korea
J.D. Edwards Espana S.L.                                   Spain
J.D. Edwards Nordic A.B.                                   Sweden
J.D. Edwards (Schweiz) AG                                  Switzerland
J.D. Edwards (Taiwan) Pte. Ltd.                            Taiwan
J.D. Edwards & Company (U.K.) Ltd.                         United Kingdom
J.D. Edwards Nova Scotia Company                           Nova Scotia
J.D. Edwards Numetrix Company                              Nova Scotia
Numetrix, Inc.                                             Connecticut
Numetrix B.V.                                              Netherlands
Numetrix Asia Pte. Ltd.                                    Singapore
Numetrix GmbH.                                             Switzerland
Numetrix, Ltd.                                             United Kingdom
World Technology Services, Inc.                            Washington
  (J.D. Edwards & Company is a 50% owner)
</Table>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel: NIAMS AMSC 
Member Conflict Review Meeting.
    Date: February 22, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and 
Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marisol Espinoza-Pintucci, Ph.D., Scientific 
Program Analyst, Division of Extramural Research, National Institute 
of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy 
Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-6959, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#325f53405b415d5e1c5741425b5c5d48531f425b5c464751515b725c5b5a1c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8b5b9aab1abb7b4f6bdaba8b1b6b7a2b9f5a8b1b6acadbbbbb198b6b1b0f6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 21, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-01594 Filed 1-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
this annual report on Form 10K, that:

     -    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     -    the information contained in the report fairly presents, on all
          material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
          operations.


/s/ John J. Remaley
----------------------------------------
John J. Remaley, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 28, 2005
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Daniel M.Bradbury, the President and Chief Executive Officer of AmylinPharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and Mark G. Foletta, the SeniorVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

**1.            **TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “PeriodicReport”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

**2.            **Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periodcovered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by the Periodic Report.

 

 

Dated:  November6, 2007

 
| /s/ DANIEL M. BRADBURY                 |                                                          | /s/ MARK G. FOLETTA | * * |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------|
| Daniel M. Bradbury                     | Mark G. Foletta                                               |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer | Senior Vice President,  Finance and Chief Financial   Officer |

 

----
Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 163 Filed: 05/21/19 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: 2403
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

TYRONE JEWETT,

Petitioner,

vs.

WARDEN, NOBLE CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cv-406

Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion to Reinstate the 

case to the Court’s active docket (Doc. 32) (the “Motion”), and the corresponding Report and 

Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on May 2, 2024 (Doc. 

33) (the “Report and Recommendation”). The Magistrate Judge recommends that this action 

be reinstated to the Court’s active docket, that the petitioner be ordered to file an amended 

petition, including his exhausted claim, and the respondent be ordered to file an answer 

thereto. Doc. 33, PageID 2054. In the time since the Report and Recommendation was issued, 

Petitioner has filed an Amended Petition (Doc. 34), and respondent has been granted an 

extension of time to file an answer. Doc. 34; Notation Order (August 20, 2024). 

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s motion and the Report and Recommendation.

Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections under 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and 

Recommendation in part. This action shall be reinstated to the Court’s active docket. The 

Court rejects the Magistrate Judge’s recommended deadlines for filing an amended petition 

Case: 1:18-cv-00406-JPH-SKB Doc #: 36 Filed: 09/06/24 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 2075
2 

and answer as MOOT in light of the already filed amended petition. Doc. 34. Respondent

shall have until October 10, 2024 to respond to Petitioner’s Amended Petition. See Notation 

Order (August 20, 2024). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 6, 2024

Hon. Jeffery P. Hopkins

United States District Judge

Case: 1:18-cv-00406-JPH-SKB Doc #: 36 Filed: 09/06/24 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 2076
#### William Harwood v. Thales W. Huntoon, drain commissioner of Leslie Township, and James Torrey, township treasurer.

*Drain proceedings*— Laches.

A bill to set aside proceedings to establish a drain, and to enjoin the collection of the drain tax, was properly dismissed where complainant had joined with others in releasing the right of way, had bid off part of the work, had neglected to inform himself as to his interests, and had delayed to file his bill until the whole tax had been collected except his share and that of one other objector.

Appeal from Ingbam. (Gridley, J.)

Oct. 17.

Oct. 31.

Bill to set aside drain proceedings and tax. Complain.•ant appeals.

Dismissal affirmed.

*Grove H. Wolcott*for complainant.

*Huntington & Henderson*for defendants.

Graves, C. J.

We think no error was committed by the ■circuit court in dismissing the bill in this cause.

It was filed in January, 1883, to set aside proceedings establishing a drain, and to enjoin the collection of complain .ant’s tax. The groundwork of the suit is that errors were ■committed in the course of the proceedings, and we think that several irregularities actually occurred; but none are pointed out or discovered which the Court can now regard as sufficient to invalidate the proceeding.

The bill rather insinuates than avers some deceptive conduct on the part of the commissioner. It does not amount to an allegation of fraud or even to a distinct charge of deception, and it would not be competent to regard it as a basis for the proof of either. But the evidence fails to fasten ■dishonest conduct on the commissioner.

The complainant has not been uniform in holding an adverse attitude. He joined with others in releasing the right *640of way, 'and he subsequently bid ofi the work for two sections. True, lie claims to have been misled or deceived,, but his explanations leave an impression that if he was, it must have been because he took very little, if any, pains tO' get accurate information. His views towards the scheme seem to have fluctuated as his opinion varied concerning his liability to be called on, or not called on, for a share of the expense. He deferred filing the bill until the entire tax,, except his own and that of another person who also filed a bill at the same time, had been collected.

The recent legislation in reference to these drain proceedings is a strong expression of policy which ought not to be* wholly disregarded, and it bears on the case before us very distinctly. Pub. Act 269 of the Laws of 1881, § 40.

The decree must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
Action 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

Stage 1 Disk $25,500 50 

Front Disk Shaft $20,000 50 

Compressor Spool $39,000 60 

Rear Shaft $14,000 50 Rear Seal $5,000 50 

Coupling Shaft $21,000 50 

Power Turbine $42,000 50 Wheel and Shaft 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $8,715,000 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: • 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and close- up) 

9 
Is the AD significant? 

YES*0 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. 

YESO 

Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

G aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 

YES*0 

*Explanation: 

10
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06481

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06481\06481_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06481\06481_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06481\06481_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06481\06481_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

06481\Cerification Statement Plant Id_06481.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0 301 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIAM G . ROSSBACH,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 4, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 26 2021

04/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0301
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4703-4704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments

ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) intends to request 
approval, from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the 
collection of information described below. The Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA) requires federal agencies to publish a notice in the Federal 
Register concerning each proposed collection of information before 
submission to OMB, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response 
to the notice. This notice complies with that requirement.

DATES: Submit comments on or before March 28, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments to Cynthia Pitts, Director, Office of 
Disaster Assistance, Small Business Administration, Washington, DC 
20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Pitts, Director, Office of 
Disaster Assistance, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7e4dec9d3cfcec689d7ced3d3d4e7d4c5c689c0c8d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80c3f9eef4e8e9e1aef0e9f4f4f3c0f3e2e1aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-205-7570, or Curtis B. 
Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96f5e3e4e2ffe5b8e4fff5fed6e5f4f7b8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d0e181f19041e431f040e052d1e0f0c430a021b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior to Small Business Administration (SBA) 
approval of subsequent loan

[[Page 4704]]

disbursement, disaster loan borrowers are required to submit 
information to demonstrate that they used loan proceeds for authorized 
purposes only and to make certain certification regarding current 
financial condition and previously reported compensation paid in 
connection with the loan.

Solicitation of Public Comments

    SBA is requesting comments on (a) Whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the agency to properly perform its 
functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are accurate; (c) whether 
there are ways to minimize the burden, including through the use of 
automated techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) 
whether there are ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information.

Summary of Information Collection

    OMB Control Number: 3245-0110.
    Title: Borrower's Progress Certification.
    Description of Respondents: Disaster loan Borrowers.
    Form Number: SBA Form 1366.
    Total Estimated Annual Responses: 14,218.
    Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 7,106.

Curtis Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2022-01726 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5    
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          28,414
<SECURITIES>                                     5,003
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                       844
<INVENTORY>                                        766
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,216
<PP&E>                                           7,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            92
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,058
<SALES>                                         31,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,031
<CGS>                                            4,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,410
<INCOME-TAX>                                       876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,534
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        


</TABLE>
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 1 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 2 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 3 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 4 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 5 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 6 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 7 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 8 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 9 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 102-6      Filed 09/19/2005     Page 10 of 10