alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 84 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 84

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the National Highway Traffic 
           Safety Administration relating to civil penalties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2022

Mr. Perry submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of a rule submitted by the National Highway Traffic 
           Safety Administration relating to civil penalties.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
relating to civil penalties published on April 1, 2022 (87 Fed. Reg. 
18994), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
exhibit_10-01.htm


Exhibit 10.01










EXTENSION TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER







 


THIS EXTENSION TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (the “Extension Agreement”) is made as of September __, 2015 by and among Mondial Ventures, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Parent”) and EZTicket Live Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Company”).  The foregoing are sometimes singly referred to as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.”


 


RECITALS:


 


WHEREAS, Company is engaged in the business of online ticketing for all types of events (the “Business”); and


 







WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of Parent, Merger Subsidiary and Company, Company Shareholders, as Company’s majority shareholders, Parent, as Merger Subsidiary’s majority shareholders, and Preferred Parent Shareholders have approved the merger of the Merger Subsidiary with and into Company (the “Merger”) upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein and have signed an Agreement and Plan of Merger on June 11, 2015 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Section 1.3 of the Agreement provided that the Termination Date of the Agreement would be July 15, 2015;


 


WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the Parties elected to extend the Termination Date of the Agreement to September 30, 2015;


 


WHEREAS, the Parties wish to extend the Termination Date to November 30, 2015 (unless such date is extended by the Parties in writing).


 


THEREFORE, The parties hereby agree to extend the Termination Date of the Agreement in Section 1.3 of the Agreement to November 30, 2015. All other provisions shall remain the same.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


 



	
MONDIAL VENTURES, INC.

	
EZTICKET LIVE INC.


	 	 
	 	 
	 By: /s/ Dennis R Alexander	By: /s/ Kevin L Jones
	Dennis R. Alexander, President	Kevin L. Jones, President
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18D0524. GRADY ALLEN WILCOX v. THE STATE.

Grady Allen Wilcox was convicted of several offenses, including possession

of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. His convictions were affirmed on

appeal. Wilcox v. State, Case No. A16A1298 (August 18, 2016) (unpublished). He

subsequently filed a pro se “Petition to Full and Fair Review of Errors.” The trial

court denied the motion, and Wilcox filed this appeal.

Without the stamped “filed” copy of the order, we cannot ascertain if the

application was filed within 30 days, which is a jurisdictional requirement.

1 See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). 

Accordingly, on June 26, 2018, we ordered Wilcox to supplement his application

within ten days with a stamped “filed” copy of the order to be appealed. We provided

that failure to comply with this directive would result in dismissal of the application.

Wilcox has not submitted a stamped “filed” copy of the trial court’s order, and

more than ten days have passed since our June 26, 2018, order. Accordingly,

Wilcox’s application is hereby DISMISSED.

1 Although the order included with the application does not contain a stamped

“filed” date, it was signed by the judge on May 18, 2018. Based on that date, the

application is untimely.

July 16, 2018
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/16/2018
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 1 of 21 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 2 of 21 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 3 of 21 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 4 of 21 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 5 of 21 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 6 of 21 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 7 of 21 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 8 of 21 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 9 of 21 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 10 of 21 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 11 of 21 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 12 of 21 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 13 of 21 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 14 of 21 PAGEID #: 14
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 15 of 21 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 16 of 21 PAGEID #: 16
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 17 of 21 PAGEID #: 17
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 18 of 21 PAGEID #: 18
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 19 of 21 PAGEID #: 19
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 20 of 21 PAGEID #: 20
Case: 3:18-mj-00457-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/18 Page: 21 of 21 PAGEID #: 21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,158
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     82,907
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        433,340
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 561,287
<DEPOSITS>                                     418,226
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             17,691
<LONG-TERM>                                     73,768
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,625
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 561,287
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,822
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,162
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,932
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,916
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,192
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,598
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,318
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      320
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 150
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,111
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,111
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.07
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,999
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,129
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      717
<RECOVERIES>                                       761
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,493
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,493
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
The United States Navy and Marine Corps rely far too much on petroleum, a 

dependency that degrades the strategic position of our country and the tactical 

performance of our forces. The global supply of oil is finite, it is becoming 

increasingly difficult to find and exploit, and over time cost continues to rise. 

So in order to improve our energy security, increase our energy independence, and 

help lead the nation towards a clean energy economy, the Department of the Navy 

established the following five ambitious energy goals that will move the Navy and 

Marine Corps away from a reliance on petroleum and will dramatically increase our 

use of alternative energy. 

 Energy Efficient Acquisition: Evaluation of energy factors will be mandatory 

when awarding contracts for systems and buildings. 

 Sail the "Great Green Fleet": DON will demonstrate a Green Strike Group in 

local operations by 2012 and sail it by 2016. 

 Reduce Non-Tactical Petroleum Use: By 2015, DON will reduce petroleum use 

in the commercial fleet by 50%. 

 Increase Alternative Energy Ashore: By 2020, DON will produce at least 50% of 

shore-based energy requirements from alternative sources; 50% of DON 

installations will be net-zero 

 Increase Alternative Energy Use DON-Wide: By 2020, 50% of total DON energy 

consumption will come from alternative sources
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 3985 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 182

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

c ost

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 5.0 $ 425.00 $ 425.00 

### 13 $ 5,525.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products i n compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 5,525



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Co ndition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.0 0 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be u sed to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Wil l the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include speci fic requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
1

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

DP 424679

DATE: 11 SEPT 2014

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Penoxsulam (119031) Label Use Report Package in Support of Registration 

Review

FROM: LaVerne Dobbins, Environmental Protection Specialist

Science Information and Analysis Branch (7503P)

TO: Patricia Parrott, Chief

 Risk Management and Implementation Branch 3

 Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P)

This memorandum transmits the Use and Usage reports for Penoxsulam (119031). This 

is a refined report. This report is a summary of all use patterns (e.g., use sites, formulations, a.i. 

percentages, application methods) for this active ingredient (a.i.) and originates from a subset of 

EPA registered and accepted labels. 

For questions, comments and other usage or label use information requests, please 

contact LaVerne Dobbins at 308-6378. Other requests for information may be addressed to OPP 

Usage and Label Use Team, our group e-mail address.

Attachments 

Label Data Report

HED Master Label Report

EFED Table 1 Report

General Chemical (Issues) Report

Label Tracking Report

Screening-level usage Analysis (SLUA)
## 2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
9-13-2007 

# In Re: F le min g C o P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 05-2365

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du
. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" I n Re: Fle min g C o " (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 342. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/342* 

## The Honorable Ronald L. Buckwalter, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 05-2365

____________ 

## IN RE: FLEMING COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., Debtors AWG ACQUISITION LLC; ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC., Appellants

____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (No. 04-cv-00371) District Judge: Honorable Sue L. Robinson, Chief Judge Argued: December 12, 2006 Before: FISHER, CHAGARES, Circuit Judges ,

and BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge *


## ORDER AMENDING OPINION CHAGARES, Circuit Judge IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion in the above case, filed August 22, 2007, be amended as follows: On page 2, change contact information for appellee’s counsel, Richard A. Chesley as follows:

## Richard A. Chesley Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP 191 North Wacker Drive, 30th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60606 By the Court,
/s/ Michael A. Chagares Circuit Judge Dated: September 13, 2007 DMM/cc: Mark T. Benedict, Esq. Selinda A. Melnik, Esq. Leonard L. Wagner, Esq. Richard A. Chesley, Esq. Daniel J. DeFranceschi, Esq.
Exhibit 21

Carmike Cinemas, Inc.

List of Subsidiaries



|                                |  |                        |  |         |     |  
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------- | --- | -
|Subsidiary                      |  | State of Incorporation |  | % Owned |    
|                                |  |                       
|Eastwynn Theatres, Inc.         |  | Alabama                |  |         | 100 | %
|George G. Kerasotes Corporation |  | Delaware               |  |         | 100 | %
|GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc.      |  | Indiana                |  |         | 100 | %
|GKC Michigan Theatres, Inc.     |  | Delaware               |  |         | 100 | %
|GKC Theatres, Inc.              |  | Delaware               |  |         | 100 | %
|Military Services, Inc.         |  | Delaware               |  |         | 100 | %
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LINCARE HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,855
<INVENTORY>                                      4,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,704
<PP&E>                                         350,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                 165,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 867,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           585
<OTHER-SE>                                     513,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   867,461
<SALES>                                        513,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               513,140
<CGS>                                           82,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               281,563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,697
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,334
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             85,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,024
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57


</TABLE>
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

9/12/19

 Southern District of Ohio

Benita Schirmer

3:18-CV-209

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant; Remanding case to the commissioner under the fourth

sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings

✔ Thomas M. Rose

Report and Recommendations
{00005964; 1} 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

SCOTT D. DALESANDRO, et al.,

 On behalf of themselves and

 all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE INTERNATIONAL PAPER

COMPANY,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.: C-1-01-109

Judge Sandra S. Beckwith

STIPULATED ENTRY 

EXTENDING TIME

The Court is informed that the parties have stipulated to an extension of time from

October 14, 2003 to October 21, 2003, for Plaintiffs to file their reply memorandum in support

of their fee application, and the Court approves and orders such extension.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

Honorable Sandra S. Beckwith

United States District Judge

Stipulated and Agreed:

s/Theresa L. Groh s/Michael Roberts per authorization

Theresa L. Groh (29806) Michael Roberts (47129)

Murdock Goldenberg Schneider Graydon, Head & Ritchey LLP

 & Groh, L.P.A. 1900 5th 3rd Center 

700 Walnut Street, Suite 400 511 Walnut Street 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-2011 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

Telephone: (513) 345-8291 Telephone: (513) 629-2799 

Facsimile: (513) 345-8294 Facsimile: (513) 651-3836

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 52 Filed 10/14/2003 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.4


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


 


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration
statement on Form S-8 of Oak Valley Bancorp of our report dated July 21, 2008 with
respect to the balance sheets of Oak Valley Community Bank as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, and the related statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity,
and cash flows for the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007
appearing in Oak Valley Bancorp’s filing on Form 10/A dated October 31, 2008.


 


	
  /s/
  Moss Adams, LLP

  	
   

  
	
  Stockton,
  California

  	
   

  
	
  March 24, 2009
##### 



EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS,
LLP

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File
Nos. 333-01569, 333-13943, 333-20005, 333-24615, 333-64203,
333-65211, 333-67511 and 333-87905) and Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-02329, 333-13481, 333-65193, 333-65221, 333-65223, and
333-85549) of New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. of our report
dated February 22, 2002, except as to Note 27, as to which
the date is March 1, 2002 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedules, which appears in
this Form 10-K.



| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York

March 8, 2002