alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC.,

POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2846

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO í30)

On August 2, 2018, the Panel transferred 50 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1407. See 316 F.Supp.3d 1380 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 193 additional action(s) have

been transferred to the Southern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions

have been assigned to the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge

Sargus.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Southern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of August 2, 2018, and, with the consent

of that court, assigned to the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7íday period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

John W. Nichols

Clerk of the Panel

May 17, 2019

5/21/2019

5/21/2019

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 164 Filed: 05/21/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 2404
IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC.,

POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2846

SCHEDULE CTOí30 í TAGíALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL

CAC 2 19í03789 Helen Weddington v. C. R. Bard, Inc., et al

NEW JERSEY

NJ 2 18í16045 DANIELS v. C.R. BARD INC. et al

OHIO NORTHERN

OHN 5 19í00945 Carter v. Davol, Inc. et al

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 164 Filed: 05/21/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 2405
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 57 

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces to evacuate citizens 

of the United States from Afghanistan after August 31, 2021, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 27, 2021 

Mr. PERRY submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces to 

evacuate citizens of the United States from Afghanistan 

after August 31, 2021, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That 

4 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

5 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Authoriza6 tion for Use of Military Force To Save Americans Strand7 ed in Afghanistan’’. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 57 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES 

2 ARMED FORCES TO EVACUATE CITIZENS OF 

3 THE UNITED STATES FROM AFGHANISTAN 

4 AFTER AUGUST 31, 2021. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President is authorized to 

6 use the Armed Forces of the United States as the Presi7 dent determines necessary and appropriate to evacuate 

8 from Afghanistan citizens of the United States after Au9 gust 31, 2021. 

10 (b) WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS.— 

11 (1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION.— 

12 Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers 

13 Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is 

14 intended to constitute specific statutory authoriza15 tion within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War 

16 Powers Resolution. 

17 (2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIRE18 MENTS.—Nothing in this joint resolution supersedes 

19 any requirement of the War Powers Resolution. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0724 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM043AD

84 - 32 - 74 --- 12/23/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 45 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to clarify 

the presidential pardoning power. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2021 

Mr. GREEN of Texas submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to clarify the presidential pardoning power. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 45 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘The President shall have no power to grant to him3 self a reprieve or pardon for an offense against the United 

4 States.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 21

CARMIKE CINEMAS, INC.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

|                        |  |                        |  |         |     |   |  | 
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------- | --- | - |  | 
|SUBSIDIARY              |  | STATE OF INCORPORATION |  | % OWNED
|                        |  |                        |  |        
|Eastwynn Theatres, Inc. |  | Alabama                |  |         | 100 | %
|Wooden Nickel Pub, Inc. |  | Delaware               |  |         | 100 | %
|Military Services, Inc. |  | Delaware               |  |         | 80  | %
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**JAMES FRANKLIN MENTZER, II**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 54 DB 2016 (No. 53 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 204910** 

**(Beaver County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1 st**  **day of July, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of Disciplinary Board Member dated June 23, 2016, is appro**  **ved and it is ORDERED that James Franklin Mentzer, II, who has been on Inactive Sta**  **tus, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he ha**  **s the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission t**  **o practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act**  **ive status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the**  **Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit**  **ioner.**
Opinion filed August 5, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-10-00099-CV

__________

JOHNNY LYNN EDWARDS, Appellant

V.

SPECIAL PROSECUTION UNIT, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 349th District Court

Anderson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 349-6467

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The trial court dismissed Johnny Lynn Edwards’s suit as frivolous. Edwards appealed. 

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Edwards’s brief was originally due to be filed on or before May 3, 2010. On our own 

motion, this court extended the due date twice. In our letter dated June 2, 2010, Edwards was 

notified that failure to file his brief by July 2, 2010, could result in the dismissal of his appeal for 

want of prosecution. There has been no response to our June 2 letter.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

August 5, 2010 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Garb Oil & Power Corporation, and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John Brewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




Date: 9/13/2004

By: /s/ John Brewer
--------------------------
John Brewer
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7092

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES CURTIS BLAKNEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-94-54, CA-97-235-3-02)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Curtis Blakney, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Curtis Blakney seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Blakney’s

Motion for Appeal of the Denial of Movant’s § 2255 Motion, deny a

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Blakney v. United States, Nos. CR94-54; CA-97-235-3-02 (W.D.N.C. filed June 8, 2001; entered June

11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HANSEN BEVERAGE COMPANY, a 

Delaware corporation, dba

Monster Beverage Company,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

No. 06-56390 v.

D.C. No. NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP., a  CV-06-05470-ER Delaware corporation; SHASTA

BEVERAGE INC., a Delaware ORDER

corporation; NEWBEVCO INC., a

Delaware corp.; FREEK’N BEVERAGE

CORP., a Delaware corporation,

Defendants-Appellants. 

Filed August 17, 2007

Before: William C. Canby, Jr. and Sidney R. Thomas,

Circuit Judges, and Suzanne B. Conlon,* District Judge.

ORDER

The motion of Hansen Beverage Company to file its

Motion to Vacate Opinion under seal is GRANTED, and its

motion and reply to the opposition are ordered sealed. 

On June 29, 2007, we filed our opinion in the appeal by

National Beverage Company of a preliminary injunction. See

Hansen Beverage Co. v. National Beverage Co., slip op.

7699, 2007 WL 1859607 (9th Cir. 2007). Our mandate has

*The Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon, Senior United States District

Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. 

10393
not yet issued. It has now been made known to us that, on

June 8, 2007, the parties had executed a settlement agreement

that, among other things, stipulated that the preliminary

injunction that was the subject of the appeal was made permanent. As a consequence, there was no longer a controversy

between the parties over the preliminary injunction at the time

we issued our opinion, and the case was moot. 

We lacked jurisdiction to decide a moot case. See In re Pattullo, 271 F.3d 898, 900 (9th Cir. 2001). We accordingly

VACATE our opinion and decision of June 29, 2007, and

DISMISS this appeal. See id. at 902. 

10394 HANSEN BEVERAGE v. NATIONAL BEVERAGE

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2007 Thomson/West.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/ PAUL G. GABOSPaul G. Gabos Chief Financial Officer


May 10, 2007
#### George P. Tenney v. George E. Hand.

*Mistake: Title: Caveat emptor.*"Where one -who has "been, made defendant to a foreclosure suit as subsequent purchaser, believing he had title to the premises, has agreed, in consideration of an extension of time for two years, personally to pay the decree, he cannot avoid liability on his undertaking by a showing that his title to the premises had proved defective, and that he had made the agreement upon the belief that his title was good; such a case is a plain one for the application of the rule *caveat emptor.*

*Submitted on briefs April 20.*

*Decided April 30.*

Error to Wayne Circuit.

*Ward <&*Palmer,.for plaintiff in error.

*Walker & Kent,*ior defendant in error.

PER Curiam:

In this case Tenney, claiming title to a lot eighteen feet front, was made defendant to a foreclosure suit by Hand, who held two mortgages given by the party under whom Tenney claimed to derive title. After Hand had obtained decree Tenney bargained with him for time, and in consideration that Hand would give two years’ time for payment, agreed by a proper instrument in writing that he would personally pay the amount of the decree.

It appears that in point of fact Tenny was mistaken in supposing that he owned all the land. His title proved defective to ten feet of it. Hand was equally ignorant of the defect, and both parties bargained on the supposition that Tenney was owner of the equity of redemption to the whole. Having obtained the time bargained for, Tenney now makes this erroneous belief of the parties in the goodness of his title a ground of defense to his agreement. In our opinion it constitutes no defense.

The case is merely that of a party who has bought a claim which proves not to be as valuable as he expected. *64In this case the defect is not so much, in the thing bought, as in a title lying back of it, which .the purchaser expected to make good by means of it. No guaranty or covenant was given by Hand, and if the defense is good, it is difficult to understand why it would not have been good had the bargain been for a quit-claim deed, which Tenney erroneously supposed would perfect some previous title. It seems to us a plain case for the application of the rule *caveat emptor.*If Tenney did not expect to take the claim at his own risk, he should have bargained for covenants. There is no putting Hand *in statu, quo.*The time bargained for has already been obtained. If it were otherwise, however, we think the agreement would have been equally binding.

The judgment must be affirmed, with cost-:.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

I, Clinton H. Severson, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Abaxis, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theRegistrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) andsection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.78m); and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.                                                                                                                            |

Dated: February 8, 2007

|   | By:    | /s/ Clinton H. Severson               |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                       |
|   |   | Clinton H. Severson                   |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       9,176,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,672,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,060,939
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,591,685
<PP&E>                                      11,058,717
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,185,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,531,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,093,002
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       156,832
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,158,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,531,727
<SALES>                                     36,013,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,013,535
<CGS>                                       12,710,850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,710,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,830,999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,883,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,829,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,054,030
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,054,030
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICEROF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Boland T. Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|       | (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |
|                           | (2)      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                           |

|                    |                                |
|--------------------|--------------------------------|
| May 8, 2009        | /s/ Boland T. Jones            |
|     | Boland T. Jones                |
|               | Chief Executive Officer        |
|               | Premiere Global Services, Inc. |

----