alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  23.1




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form  S-8  No. 33-16220, Form S-8 No. 33-16084, Form S-8 No. 33-60926, and Form
S-8  No.  333-10813  pertaining  to  the  Incentive  Stock  Option  Plan,  the
Non-Qualified  Stock  Option  Plan,  the 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan and the
1995  Stock  Option  Plan) of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. of our report
dated  February  18, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and  schedule  of  P.A.M.  Transportation  Services, Inc. included in the Annual
Report  (Form  10-K)  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  1999.


                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Fayetteville, Arkansas
March 13, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles F. Boyle, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Trust, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust at the end of, and for the period covered by the Report.



/s/ Charles F. BoyleVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 12, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and
will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Dale WILSON, et al. v. ARKANSAS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al.

85-275

707 S.W.2d 768

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered April 21, 1986

*Gibson Law Office,*by: *Charles S. Gibson,*for appellants.

*Norman M. Smith,*for appellees.

*Friday, Eldredge & Clark,*by: *Christopher Heller, amicus curiae*for DeWitt School District.

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is another case of voluntary school consolidation under Act 445 of 1983.

The St. Charles School District Board of Education unanimously resolved to petition the Arkansas County Board of Education to annex the district to the Dewitt School District. The county board correctly read the pertinent section of Act 445 as being mandatory and granted the petition.

The appellants, patrons of the St. Charles District, opposed the annexation at the county board hearing and raise the sole issue that before allowing annexation, a finding must be made by the county board that the district proposing voluntary annexation was not in compliance with the minimum standards for accreditation of the Quality Education Act, Act 445. The circuit court found no such requirement and we agree.

The Quality Education Act makes provision for school districts to voluntarily petition to merge with an adjoining district *558between June 1, 1984 and June 1, 1987. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 80-4609 (Supp. 1985). Those districts that recognize that they cannot comply with the new standards are thereby given a choice to decide with which adjoining district they want to merge. We recently decided that Ark. Stat. Ann. § 80-4609 (c) is mandatory; that once a proper petition is filed pursuant to that section, the county board is without discretion to deny it. *Loyd*v. *Knight,*288 Ark. 474, 706 S.W.2d 393 (1986).

Having no reason to deny the petition, the Arkansas County Board of Education properly granted the petition.

Affirmed.

Purtle, J., not participating.
January 10, 1997


Mr. Alan B. Miller
President
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
367 South Gulph Road
King of Prussia, PA  19406


Dear Alan:

     The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust at their
December 2, 1996, meeting authorized the renewal of the current Advisory
Agreement between the Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. ("Agreement") upon the
same terms and conditions.

     This letter constitutes the Trust's offer to renew the Agreement until
December 31, 1997, upon the same terms and conditions. Please acknowledge UHS of
Delaware, Inc.'s acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below
and returning one copy of this letter to me.


                                            Sincerely yours,


                                            Kirk E. Gorman
                                            President and Secretary



cc:      Warren J. Nimetz, Esquire
         Charles Boyle

Agreed to and Accepted:

UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.


By:
     Alan B. Miller, President



j:lashj/letters/miller2.doc
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Rizzani de Eccher (USA), Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W912ER-11-C-0001 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 62364
Jeffrey G. Gilmore, Esq. John M. Neary, Esq.

AkermanLLP Washington, DC Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Nancy L. Pell, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East Winchester, VA OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SHACKLEFORD This is the quantum phase ofASBCA No. 61805. The parties have filed ajoint motion for entry ofa consentjudgment in favor ofappellant in the amount of $4,524,796.11. They also represent that interest shall accrue on this amount from November 30, 2019 until paid. It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 

### §§ 7105(e). 7108(b), and the partiesjointmotion that the appeal is sustained. In the nature ofa consentjudgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of$4,524,796.11 plus Contract Disputes Act interest from November 30, 2019 until paid. Dated: February 14, 2020

(Signatures continued) RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI concur 

# &~--
OWEN C. WILSON Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur

HEIDIi.sRHOUT Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62364, Appeal ofRizzani de Becher (USA), Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles F. Boyle, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Trust, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Trust at the end of, and for the period covered by, the Report. 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
#### Supreme Lodge of Woodmen of Union *v.*Walker.

Opinion delivered March 24, 1930.

*J. D. Shackelford,*for appellant.

*Arthur D. Chavis,*for appellees.

Kirby, J.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment against appellant, upon a policy of insurance or a benefit certificate for $500 issued to William Walker, colored, naming appellees beneficiaries therein. The insured was recmired to pay $1.25 per mouth for his membership and insurance, which provided a sick benefit of $5 per week for total disability, and $3 per week for *408partial disability. Walker was taken sick about the first Sunday in April, 1927, while in good standing in the Union, and continued sick until his death in October, 1927. During the sickness in the last of August, 1927, appellant paid Walker sick benefits amounting to $8 through the local lodge of Pine Bluff, under the policy for which credit was given when suit was brought for the balance of $492, and for which judgment was recovered.

Appellant company claimed that insured had failed to pay his dues or premium for the month of August, during that month, and his policy had lapsed on that account, and denied any liability.

The testimony is in conflict: that on the part of ap-pellees tending to show that the August premium was paid in August within the time designated therefor by the by-laws of the Union, while the evidence upon appellant’s part conduced to show that the August dues or premium was not paid to the local agent until early in September, after the time for payment had expired; that it was never sent to the treasurer of the Union at Hot Springs at all, but later on, after the death of the insured, was returned by the local agent to one of the beneficiaries, the widow declining to accept it. The check for the sick benefit, $8, was for the month of August, and was delivr ered to the insured sometime during the last of that month.

The question for determination is one of fact, whether the August dues Avere paid. Although the insurance company could not declare a forfeiture of the sickness or accident policy for nonpayment of installments of premiums or dues while it had in its own hands due the insured on account of sickness a larger amount of money than was required to pay the installments of premiums or due thereunder *(Continental Casualty Co.*v. *Baker,)*and could have deducted from the benefit or indemnity due the member for August the amount of his dues or premium — $1.25—for that month unpaid on the 15th, it did not do so, but paid the whole amount, none of which *409was returned to it. It may be conceded, that tlie preponderance of the testimony shows that the dues for August were not given to the local agent of the Union at Pine Bluff until after the month of August had expired, and on September.,., hut, as already said, the testimony was in conflict on this point, and the jury found in appellees’ favor on instructions not complained of, and upon substantial testimony sufficient to support the verdict, which cannot be disturbed on appeal.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Case: 2:21-cv-04766-MHW-CMV Doc #: 2 (Court only) Filed: 09/27/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID

#:43

United States District Court

Southern District of Ohio

Related Case Memorandum

Civil Cases

TO: Judge Watson. Magistrate Judge Deavers, and Mafiistrate Judge Vascura

FROM: Donald A. Fitzgerald III , Deputy Clerk

DATE: 9/27/2021

SUBJECT: Case Caption: Doe v. The Ohio State University

CASE: Case Number: Doc. 2:21-cv-4766 1

Judge Michael H. Watson and Magistrate Judge Chelsey

DISTRICT JUDGE: M. Vascura

File Date: 9/22/2021

This memorandum is to notify you that the civil cover sheet on the above referenced case reflects

the following alleged related case(s):

Related Case(s):

Case Caption: Garrett et al v. The Ohio State University

Case Number: Doc. 2;18-cv-692 1 District Judge: Watson

File Date: 7/16/2018 Magistrate Judge: Deavers

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 199 Filed: 10/01/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1520
Case: 2:21-cv-04766-MHW-CMV Doc #: 2 (Court only) Filed: 09/27/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID

#:44

Memo Re: Related Civil Cases

Page 2

The District Judges having conferred, we respond to Case Administrator Donald A. Fitzgerald III

as follows:

Judges' Response:

Q We agree that the cases are not related and that the subject case should remain

with the Judge to whom it is assigned.

D We agree that the cases are related and t^Cs/^ect case should be

transferred to the docket of Judge

□ We agree that although the cases are related, the subject case nevertheless should

remain with the Judge to whom it was assigned.

n We are unable to agree and will accept any decision made by the Chief Judge.

O I am the Judge on both/all of the listed cases and have determined that the cases

are not related.

I am the Judge on both/all of the listed cases and have determined that the cases

are related and they shall both/all remain on my docket.

D Other Direction of Judge:

United States District Judge

United States District Judge

United States District Judge

Cc: Courtroom Deputies

Revised 7/19/2012

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 199 Filed: 10/01/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1521
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each of the undersigned officers and directors of Applied Innovation Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby appoints Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr.
and Curtis A. Loveland as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, or either of
them, with power to act without the other, as his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, in his name and on his behalf, and in any and all capacities
stated below, to sign and to cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the Company's annual report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments thereto, hereby granting unto said
attorneys, and to each of them, full power and authority to do and perform in
the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all such capacities, every
act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully
as each of the undersigned could or might do in person, hereby granting to each
such attorney full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that either such attorney or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney in
counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 10, 2003.



DIRECTORS/OFFICERS:



                  Signature                              Title
                  ---------                              -----



/s/ Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr.                Chairman, President and Chief
-------------------------------------       Executive Officer
Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr.                    (Principal Executive Officer)



/s/ Michael P. Keegan                       Vice President, Chief Financial
------------------------------------        Officer and Treasurer
Michael P. Keegan                           (Principal Financial and Principal
                                            Accounting Officer)



/s/ Michael J. Endres                       Director
------------------------------------
Michael J. Endres



/s/ Thomas W. Huseby                        Director
------------------------------
Thomas W. Huseby



/s/ William H. Largent                      Director
------------------------------
William H. Largent



/s/ Curtis A. Loveland                      Director
------------------------------------
Curtis A. Loveland



/s/ Gerard B. Moersdorf, Sr.                Director
------------------------------------
Gerard B. Moersdorf, Sr.



/s/ Richard W. Oliver                       Director
------------------------------------
Richard W. Oliver



/s/ Alexander B. Trevor                     Director
---------------------------
Alexander B. Trevor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SANDY GREEN, 

Defendant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

:

Case No. 3:18-mj-00197 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

BINDOVER ORDER 

This matter was set for preliminary examination on March 28, 2018. Defendant 

appeared with counsel and waived her right to a preliminary examination. The Court 

found the waiver to be knowing and voluntary and therefore orders that Defendant be 

bound over to the grand jury to answer the charge. 

April 11, 2018 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 3:18-cr-00104-WHR Doc #: 12 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 28
## Proposed Rule: Revisions to Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, and Proposed Confidentiality

Determ inations under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Meeting Documentation : American Chemistry Council Meeting with US EPA Date Staff Contact Informat ion

(Nam e, em ail, phone #) Nam e of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.) Written Comments Provided? Did they also submit to Docket? Date sent to

E PA

- CCD

November 19, 2013 Lisa Grogan

- McCulloch Grogan

-grogan
mcculloch.lisa@epa.gov 617

- 918

- 1481 American Chemistry Council: 

### Leslie Hulse (Leslie_Hulse@americanchemistry .com) Lorraine Gershman (L orraine_Gershman@americanchemistry .com) A meeting was held where American Chemistry Council provided comments regarding the pro posed rule. Key issues covered included the inputs verification tool and emission data. No written

comments
were provided during meeting. Comments submitted to docket. N/A

(comments submitted to docket.)
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
January 16, 2013 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2013-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MELISSA MCFADDEN, 

Case No. 2:18-cv-544

Plaintiff, Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

v. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

CITY OF COLUMBUS, DEFENDANT CITY OF COLUMBUS’

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO MANUALLY 

FILE A FLASH DRIVE CONTAINING 

AUDIO EXHIBITS

Defendant.

Defendant City of Columbus respectfully moves this Court for an order granting it leave 

to manually file a flash drive in support of its forthcoming dispositive motion. The drive will 

contain audio files that cannot be filed with the Court electronically. Plaintiff has been provided 

all of the referenced files during discovery but will again be served with another copy if leave to 

file is granted. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Westley M. Phillips

Susan E. Williams (0073375)—LEAD

Westley M. Phillips (0077728)

Assistant City Attorney

CITY OF COLUMBUS, DEPARTMENT OF LAW

ZACH KLEIN, CITY ATTORNEY

77 North Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215

(614) 645-7385 / (614) 645-6949 (fax)

sewilliams@columbus.gov

wmphillips@columbus.gov

Attorneys for Defendant City of Columbus

Case: 2:18-cv-00544-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 01/25/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 107
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on January 25, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court by using this Court’s e-Filing System, which will send a notice of this electronic filing 

to all counsel of record in this matter:

/s/ Westley M. Phillips

Westley M. Phillips (0077728)

Case: 2:18-cv-00544-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 31 Filed: 01/25/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 108
M.H. v. CULLMAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2151008

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

ROBERT HUSTON, : CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00062
Plaintiff, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
v. AGREED ORDER
UGN, Inc., ;
Defendant.

Pursuant to $.D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.3(a), and upon agreement of counsel for the parties,
Plaintiff shall have until May 17, 2019 in which to respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. 19).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

(Rar rooms,

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

Agreed:

/s/ Martin McHenry

MARTIN McHENRY (0022543)
Trial Attorney for Plaintiff

414 Walnut Street, Suite 315
Cincinnati, OH 45202

Phone: 513-241-0441

e-mail: martinn@mmchenrylaw.com

/s/ Judson D. Stelter by Martin McHenry
JUDSON D.STELTER (OH 0084295)
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
170 South Main Street, Suite 1000
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Phone: 801-833-0500
Fax: 801-931-2500

e-mail: jdstelter@michaelbest.com