alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 19, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-19-1998
<CASH>                                      40,456,755
<SECURITIES>                                 9,453,346
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,415,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                   216,785
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,137,265
<PP&E>                                     218,351,684
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,322,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             301,503,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,203,466
<BONDS>                                    153,983,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,749,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               301,503,888
<SALES>                                     22,615,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,613,856
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,376,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,197,731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                610,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                   220,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            390,945
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   390,945
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
cotton gins

Weaver, Lany, NMENV to: Ashley Mohr 04/18/2012 10:30 AM

From: "Weaver, Lany, NMENV" <lany.weaver@state.nm.us>

To: Ashley Mohr/R6/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

1 attachment

Hi, Ashley. I received your phone message about trends in the numbers of cotton gins. I don’t have new

information about the numbers of gins, except to say that I haven’t heard of any new ones in a long time

(since long before the rule was adopted). An explanation is attached

– cotton production in NM has

been going down for a long time. There is no need for new gins when the existing ones are getting less

cotton to gin each year.

I hope this helps. Let me know if I can provide any other information.

Lany Weaver

N ew Mexico Environment Departmen t

Air Quality Bureau

(505) 476-4322
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
RICHARD WAGNER, : Case No. 1:18-cv-388
Plaintiff, Judge Timothy S. Black
vs.
CINCINNATI S.I. CO.,
Defendant.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This civil action came before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary
Dismissal. (Doc. 6). It is ORDERED that this civil action is hereby DISMISSED with

prejudice and, accordingly, shall be TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ate: Ss TW 4
D Jd 14 ae = Che

Timothy aay
United Statés District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, 

INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA 

MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

This document relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS.

 Case No. 2:18-md-2846

 JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 36

When a plaintiff has died while a case is pending, any Motion to Substitute filed pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a) should address whether the proposed substitute is a 

representative of the deceased plaintiff’s estate, as opposed to the deceased plaintiff’s heir or next 

of kin, regardless of whether the plaintiff died testate or intestate. If the moving party’s position 

is that the proposed substitute is not required to be a representative of the deceased plaintiff’s estate 

under applicable state law, the Motion to Substitute must include relevant authority supporting that 

position.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

9/9/2022 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 660 Filed: 09/09/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 8024
LAw OFFICE OF JOHN MIETUS, LLc 

6701 DEMOCRACY BOULEVARD, SUITE 300 

BETHESDA, MD 20817-7500 

JOHN R.IvtiETus,]R. 

(202) 747-5212 

john@mietuslaw.com 

September 15, 2014 

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Ms. Laura Remo 

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Re: Docket OST-2014-0152; Caribbean Sun Airlines, Inc. 

d/b/a World_Atlantic Airlines; Motion to Shorten Answer Period 

Dear Ms. Remo: 

World Atlantic has completed its poll of the U.S. carriers served on 

September 12, 2014 with the above-captioned motion. There were no objections. 

The Joint Applicants would appreciate expedited Department action on their 

application. 

Re sp e ctfully s ub mitte d, 

~ 

a , 

7 John R. Mietus, Jr. 

Counsel for World lantic Airlines 

cc: Docket 

Vanessa Balgobin 

Shabu Thomas
## LAw OFFICE OF JOHN MIETUS, LLc 6701 DEMOCRACY BOULEVARD, SUITE 300 BETHESDA, MD 20817-7500 JOHN R.IvtiETus,]R. (202) 747-5212 john@mietuslaw.com September 15, 2014 

### BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Ms. Laura Remo Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington DC 20590 Re: Docket OST-2014-0152; Caribbean Sun Airlines, Inc. d/b/a World_Atlantic Airlines; Motion to Shorten Answer Period Dear Ms. Remo: World Atlantic has completed its poll of the U.S. carriers served on September 12, 2014 with the above-captioned motion. There were no objections. The Joint Applicants would appreciate expedited Department action on their application. Re sp e ctfully s ub mitte d,



# ~ a , 

### 7 John R. Mietus, Jr. Counsel for World lantic Airlines

cc: Docket Vanessa Balgobin Shabu Thomas
1 

### Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation

21513 Rudder Lane Georgetown, Delaware 19947 Phone: 302
- 854
- 0244 June 5, 2013 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION Federal Aviation Administration c/o U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 800 Independence Avenue Washington, D.C. 20591
- 0004
To Whom It May

Concern: The Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization based in Georgetown, Delaware, requests an exemption from Federal Aviation Regulation 91.315 in order to provide pilot training aboard the Foundation’s North American B
- 25J Mitchell (N9079Z). This exemption would allow the museum to operate this Limited Category

aircraft while carrying passengers/crew for compensation or hire for training purposes. The Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation has operated this B
- 25 for eight ye ars. Our pilots and maintenance staff have had little turnover over during this time period adding stability to our operations. Our primary p ilot is B
- 25 ty

pe rated , a certified flight instructor airplane fo r airplane single engine land, airplane multiengine land, instrument airplane, advanced ground instructor, and a FAA designated pilot proficiency examiner in the B
- 25
. He will be providing training and evaluations for pilots seeking to upgrade in this clas s and type of airplane. We believe that providing training and operating experience in this class and ty pe of aircraft will benefit the warbird community and promote safety for the best interest of the general public. Granting this request will provide a segment of the aviation community

an opportunity

f or flight instruction that is not readily available in these ty

pes of aircraft. This request does not set a precedent as Stallion 51 , the Eagle Flight Museum and Texas Aviation Hall of Fame operate a P
- 51, B
- 25, and B
- 17 , respectfully, under an exemption for similar purposes. The Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation currently operates it’s B
- 25 under exemption number 8702B allowing us to receive compensation for educational and historic fights. Over the past seven years we have demonstrated we can safely2

maintain and operate our aircraft while providing a beneficial service to the public. W e will continue to maintain our aircraft and conduct pilot training to the prescribed standards to achieve an equivalent level of safety. Granting this request will allow the Delaware Aviation Museum the ability to continue its mission to restore, maintain and operate these historic aircraft while increasing operational safety among the participants in the program. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
Regards,
Larry D. Kelley Director Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 209-5 Filed: 11/08/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 5301
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 23

- 00073

- CV

Natin Paul , Individually and as Trustee of the Natin Paul Management Trust Dated February 29, 2012 , Appellant

v.
HAR

- 3M, LLC , Appellee

FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COU NTY N O. D

- 1

- GN

- 21

- 003079 , THE HONORABLE MARIA CANTÚ HEXSEL , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Natin Paul , individually and as trustee of the Natin Paul Management Trust Dated February 29, 2012 , has filed an unopposed m otion to di smiss this appeal. We gr ant appellant ’ s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. Ap p. P. 4 2.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis , Ju stice
Before C hief Justice Byrne , Justices Triana and Theofanis
Dismissed on Appellant ’ s M o tion
Filed: April 12, 2023
Exhibit 10(e)


                                              PACCAR
                                              FINANCIAL


                                              JUNE 30, 2000

FAX 913-829-0622
Mr. Steven W. Ruben
Chief Financial Officer
OTR Express, Inc.
804 North Meadowbrook Drive
Olathe,  Kansas  66063-0819


Dear Mr. Ruben:

Based on your request for payment deferment on the equipment financed by
PACCAR Financial Corp our credit department has approved a two months
deferment of payments.  This deferments of payments is contingent upon our
receipt of fees for this deferment in the amount of $83,989.40.  The amount of
$2900 is process fees and the amount of $81,089.40 is interest on the
contracts that accrues during the deferment period.  If OTR Express wishes to
go forward with this payment deferral (extension) please send a check in the
above amount to this office to initiate the process.

                                         Sincerely,
                                         /s/ Sam Frazier

                                         Sam Frazier


                      PACCAR Financial Corp.
     1505 LBJ Freeway, Suite 150  Dallas, Texas 75234  (972) 481-3290
             P.O. Box 140516  Irving,  Texas  75014-0516
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WPI GROUP, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          84,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,576,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                   304,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,858,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,982,432
<PP&E>                                      11,967,164
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,253,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,481,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,445,250
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,784
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,482,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,481,497
<SALES>                                     28,330,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,330,852
<CGS>                                       17,047,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,047,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,333,101
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             505,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,443,874
<INCOME-TAX>                                   806,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,637,874
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,637,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6220** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL, a/k/a Dick , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5:99

- cr - 00012

- V

- 6; 5:15

- cv - 00092

- RLV )

Submitted : June 16, 2016 Decided: June 22, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not bindin g precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court ’s order denying his post

- judgment motion for recusal as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Powell , No. 5:15

- cv - 00092

- RLV (W.D.N.C. Jan.
19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, W. Phillip Marcum, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metretek Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) *[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 

 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 6, 2006 /s/ W. Phillip Marcum W. Phillip Marcum    President and Chief Executive Officer
Clean Air Act Advisory Committee 

Draft Meeting Agenda 

May 13 -14, 2009 

May 13 – Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel (14th & K Streets, NW D.C.)

8:30 – 12:00 Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovation/Climate Change 

 Workgroup Formation Discussion 

1:00 – 3:30 Permits/NSR/Toxics/185 work group joint meeting 

May 13 -Almas Temple 1315 K Street next to Hamilton Crowne Plaza 

3:30 – 4:15 Air – the search for one Clean Breath 

4:30 – 6:30 Clean Air Excellence Awards Ceremony 

6:30 – 7:45 Awards Reception 

May 14 – Almas Temple (1315 K Street next to Hamilton Crowne Plaza)

8:00- 8:30 Registration 

8:30 – 9:15 Welcome AA/Administrator 

9:15 – 9:30 Mobile Sources Technical Review Subcommittee Report Out

 John Guy – Office Of Transportation and Air Quality 

 

 Meet 2 of the Clean Air Excellence Award Winners 

9:30 – 9:55 LEHR Presentation -Captain Bernardo Herzer, 

 CEO and Founder 

9:55 – 10:35 Air North Texas Presentation and The Best E-Story Never Told 

 Wei Wei Cham - North Central Texas Council of Governments 

 Ralph Marquez – CAAAC member 

10:35– 10:50 Break 

10:50 – 12:20 Initial responses to Vision/Goal Report

 Greg Green – Environmental Protection Agency 

 Chris Shaver – National Park Service 

 Arturo Blanco –Houston Dept of Health and Human 

 Services 

12:20 – 1:30 Lunch 

1:30 – 2:45 185 Work group recommendations 

 Bob Wyman and Eddie Terrill Work group Co-chairs 

2:45 – 3:45 Climate Change Work Group – Open discussion amongst members 

 Look for 3 – 5 areas concerning climate change that we believe we can 

 come to meaningful consensus on. 

3:45 – 4:00 Public Comments
4:00 – 4:15 Next meeting/Close
EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED
                               PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated May 22, 1998 (except for Notes A and G, as to
which the date is June 2, 1998), accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report of New Retail Concepts, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 1998. We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of New Retail
Concepts, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-31959).


GRANT THORNTON LLP


New York, New York
June 25, 1998
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 599
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 2 of 12 PAGEID #: 600
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 3 of 12 PAGEID #: 601
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 4 of 12 PAGEID #: 602
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 5 of 12 PAGEID #: 603
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 6 of 12 PAGEID #: 604
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 7 of 12 PAGEID #: 605
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 8 of 12 PAGEID #: 606
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 9 of 12 PAGEID #: 607
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 10 of 12 PAGEID #: 608
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 11 of 12 PAGEID #: 609
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 57 Filed: 08/09/18 Page: 12 of 12 PAGEID #: 610
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case Number 2:18-cr-147

Bilal A. El Yousseph, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

Defendant.

ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his/her right to a detention hearing under

18 U.S.C. §3142(f) and agreed to be detained in the custody of the United States Marshal

pending final resolution of this matter.1

It is therefore ORDERED that defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate,

to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. Defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with defense counsel. On order of a Court of the United States or request of an attorney for

the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant

to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court

proceeding.

July 24, 2018 s/Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

 (Date) ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS

 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

___________________ 

1 A detention hearing will be rescheduled upon written motion.

Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/24/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. Case No. 2:18-cr-147

Bilal A. El-Yousseph

OPINION AND ORDER

By order dated January 21, the court dismissed defendant’s

motion and supplemental motion for compassionate release without

prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc.

63). Defendant has now submitted a supplemental motion to which he

attached a copy of his September 15, 2020, request to the warden

for compassionate release. Doc. 64. Defense counsel shall have

until February 8, 2021, to file any additional memorandum or

evidence. The government shall have until February 19, 2021, to

file any additional response.

Date: January 29, 2021 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge 

Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 65 Filed: 01/29/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 216
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1778 Prepped byOllie Stewart 

### Document

Number: 

# 211 ) II-J- 4 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:01 AM Sheet 211 of 276

# \4i 22\, ' I P

A cop y o f thi s ite

m i s temporaril y

unavailabl e AA H II-J-4 P. 2