alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leon
Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Leon Moore
-----------------------
Leon Moore
Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004

<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sholodge, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bob
Marlowe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/  Bob Marlowe
-----------------------
Bob Marlowe
Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141250 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141250 

 COA: 286580 

Kalamazoo CC: 2007-000606-FC 

ANDREW JOHN MILLER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### Fw: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg , and scheduling next mtg Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 05/03/2010 11:00 AM Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D. Environmental Protection Specialist Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-7524 stewart.michael@epa.gov ----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/03/2010 11:00 AM -----

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/03/2010 10:45 AM Subject: RE: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg

Thanks for your message, Lydia, 1) Thu meeting is in response to your suggestion that we brief the interagency group on policy decisions this week (not modeling) 2) The reviewer asked for key comments only, so what you suggest (the main group of public health commenters, UARG, API, ACC and all the state comments) would be perfect, thank you. We appreciate EPA sending these to help reviewers move more quickly, rather than asking reviewers to fish through regulations.gov. I hope you had a good weekend, heidi

-----Original Message----- From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:41 AM To: King, Heidi R. Cc: Morrison.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov; Stewart.Michael@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg Heidi, I just left you a VM with a question about Thursday's meeting. Mike and I also have a question about which comments you would like to have. We have about 80-100 substantive comments. We can send you the main group of public health commenters, UARG, API, ACC and all the state comments. Does this sound sufficient, or would you like to see all of them? Thanks. Lydia

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._ King@omb.eop.gov>To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 04/30/2010 03:23 PM Subject: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg

Hello Lydia and Margaret, Reviewers have asked EPA to share key comments described in the briefing today, including those from Health and Environmental Groups, Industry Groups, State and local governments cited in the presentation. Also – is EPA available the morning of Thursday, 5/6, for a teleconference on EPA’s final rule? Thanks, heidi
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aethlon Medical, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James A. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1. Such quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Aethlon Medical, Inc.

Date: November 13, 2006

By: /s/ James A. Joyce
    -----------------------
    James A. Joyce
    Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Aethlon Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Aethlon Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
TS

– 11KK 6F , Physical and Chemical Properties Worksheet, FTIR Trace

Reacted
IN THESUPREME COURT OF 

### PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF 

### PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 77 MM 2019

v. 

### STEFON POWELL,Respondent

Petitioner ORDER PER 

### CURIAM AND NOW, this 23rd day of 

### September, 2019, the 

### Application for Leave to File 

### Original Process is 

### GRANTED, and the Petitionfor 

### Writ of 

### HabeasCorpus is DENIED.
11

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 12 Filed: 09/10/18 Page: 1 of 1  PAGEID #: 111
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 8

- 4 0 174 Summary Calendar

In the Matter of:

DEBRA ANN LOHRI, Debtor.

DEBRA ANN LOHRI

, A ppell ant
, v ersus

SPECIALIZED L OAN SERVICING, L.L.C.,

Appell ee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eas tern District of Texas No. 4 :1 7

- C V

- 86 6

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Debra Lohri’s notice of appeal from the bankruptcy court to the district

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 6, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40174 Document: 00514750732 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2018No. 1 8

- 4 0 174

2 court arrived at the office of the bankruptcy clerk a few days after the due date.
She appeals the dismissal of that appeal, contending that we should expand

the “mailbox ru le” to make it available beyond just prisoners. Rule 8002 of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, entitled “Time for filing Notice of
Appeal,” includes an exception, in subsection (c), for “Appeal by an Inmate

Confined in an Institution.”

Lohri is not an inmate, so the usual rule applies to her. In Wright v. Kite
Brothers, L.L.C. (In re Kite) , 710 F. App’x 628, 631−32 (5 th Cir. 2018) (per
curiam), we carefully explained that Rule 8002 is jurisdictional. See Dorsey v.
U.S. Dep’t of Educ. , 870 F .3d 359, 362 (5th Cir. 2017); Smith v. Gartley (In re

Berman

- Smith) , 737 F.3d 997, 1003 (5 th Cir. 2013).

The judgment of dismissal for want of j urisdiction is AFFIRMED. Case: 18-40174 Document: 00514750732 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2018
Exhibit 10.11






Exhibit 10.11




Compensatory Arrangements for Named Executive Officers




The Bank is an “at will” employer and does not provide written employment agreements to any of its
employees. However, employees, including Named Executive Officers (or “NEOs”), receive (a) cash
compensation (i.e., (i) base salary, and, for exempt employees, (ii) “variable” or “at risk”
short-term incentive compensation); (b) retirement-related benefits (i.e., Qualified Defined
Benefit Plan; Qualified Defined Contribution Plan; Nonqualified Defined Benefit Portion of the
Benefit Equalization Plan (“BEP”); Nonqualified Defined Contribution Portion of the BEP;
Nonqualified Profit Sharing Plan; and, effective January 1, 2009, a Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Plan); and (c) health and welfare programs and other benefits. Other benefits, which
are available to all regular employees, include medical, dental, vision care, life, business travel
accident, and short and long term disability insurance, flexible spending accounts, an employee
assistance program, educational development assistance, voluntary life insurance, long term care
insurance, fitness club reimbursement and severance pay. An additional benefit offered to all
officers, age 40 or greater, or who are at Vice President rank or above, is a physical examination
every 18 months.





The annual base salaries for the Named Executive Officers are as follows (whole dollars):



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2008	 	 	2009	 
	Alfred A. DelliBovi
	 	$	615,634	 	 	$	649,494	 
	Patrick A. Morgan
	 	 	305,411	 	 	 	319,154	 
	Peter S. Leung
	 	 	405,066	 	 	 	423,294	 
	Paul B. Héroux
	 	 	288,019	 	 	 	300,980	 
	Craig E. Reynolds
	 	 	282,613	 	 	 	295,331	 






More information about compensation arrangements can be found in Item 11 of the Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 99.06





Contact:  David Zynn, CFO                   James K. White, Managing Director
          SMT Health Services Inc.          Kehoe, White, Savage & Company, Inc.
          (412) 933-3300                    (310) 437-0655
          http://www.smthealth.com



                 SMT HEALTH SERVICES ANNOUNCES ADDITION OF ITS
                          EIGHTEENTH MOBILE MRI UNIT



Pittsburgh, PA, November 4, 1996 -- SMT Health Services Inc. (NASDAQ/NMS: SHED,
SHEDW) today announced that it has purchased a mobile MRI unit from Palmetto
Community Health Network (the "Network") and has signed new service contracts
with six (6) South Carolina hospitals which are members of the Network.  The
Company will begin servicing the new hospitals with the unit purchased from the
Network immediately and plans to trade-in and upgrade the purchased unit to a
new 1.0 T GE Horizon in mid-December.  The Company anticipates signing several
additional service contracts with Network affiliated hospitals.

The new unit represents the Company's eighteenth mobile MRI unit and is the
seventh new unit acquired this year.

SMT Health Services Inc., through its fleet of eighteen mobile units, provides
diagnostic imaging services to healthcare providers in Pennsylvania, West
Virginia, North Carolina, Virginia, South Carolina, Kentucky and Ohio.



                                   #   #   #
IA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 103 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising 

Shareholder Rights’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Mr. BARR (for himself, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. HUIZENGA, Mr. MURPHY of North 

Carolina, Mr. STEIL, Mr. HILL, and Mr. FINSTAD) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Labor relating to ‘‘Prudence and 

Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising 

Shareholder Rights’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Labor relating to ‘‘Prudence and Loyalty in 

5 Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 103 IH 

1 Rights’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 73822 (December 1, 2022)), and 

2 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1 

# APPENDIX E

NOAA Satellite Services – Smoke Detection

[www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/FIRE/DATA/ SMOKE/2008; map.ngdc. noaa.gov/website/firedet ects/viewer.htm]

[For space considerations, Smoke Text Products were edited to show only California and related narratives]



## JUNE 2008234567891011121314 

## JULY 2008151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738 Thursday, July 25, 200839404142434445 

## AUGUST 2008464748
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 1,441,372
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             14,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       1,498,547
<PP&E>                                                11,018,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                         3,513,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         9,003,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    296,787
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                             8,304,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           9,003,683
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       2,154,339
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,437,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          35,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         1,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          679,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      679,751
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             679,751
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JESSICA MARTIN,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:18-cr-109-11

JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE

ORDER

Pursuant to § 15002(b)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic 

Security Act (the “CARES Act”), Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020), and this 

Court’s General Order Nos. 20-05, 20-07, 20-18, 20-23, 20-26, 20-27, 20-31, 20-35, 20-

36, 20-38, 21-04, 21-06, 21-07, and 21-09, the undersigned, as the District Judge to 

whom this case is assigned, finds in this felony case that the change of plea pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 cannot be further delayed without serious 

harm to the interests of justice. 

Specifically, this Court finds that serious harm may occur to the interests of 

justice in that further delay to Defendant Jessica Martin’s change of plea hearing 

would interfere with both her and society’s interest in prompt resolution of criminal 

matters. See United States v. Westmoreland, 712 F.3d 1066, 1076 (7th Cir. 2013) 

(“Both the accused and society as a whole have an interest in prompt resolution of 

criminal proceedings.”) (citing Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 519–20 (1972)). Such 

delay would also interfere with Martin’s ability to begin satisfying any penalty or 

sanction associated with the charged crime to which she intends to plead guilty, a 

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 193 Filed: 04/27/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1103
2 

delay which “may have a detrimental effect on rehabilitation.” See Barker, 407 U.S. 

at 520. (observing that “delay between arrest and punishment may have a 

detrimental effect on rehabilitation”). 

This Court further finds that Martin, after consultation with her counsel, has 

consented to the use of video conferencing to conduct the change of plea. 

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS that the change of plea hearing may be 

conducted by use of video conferencing technology.

SO ORDERED. 

April 27, 2021

DATE DOUGLAS R. COLE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 193 Filed: 04/27/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1104
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-3270EA

_____________

Ray Antwane Higgins, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

City of Little Rock; Louie Caudell, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Chief of Police; John Does, *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: March 19, 1998

Filed: March 26, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Ray Antwane Higgins brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of

Little Rock (City), police chief Louie Caudell, and a number of John Does. He claims

his arrest by Little Rock police officers violated his constitutional rights, and the City

and Caudell failed adequately to train and supervise the officers. The district court

granted summary judgment in favor of the City and Caudell. Higgins appeals, and we

affirm.
-2-

We do not believe the district court abused its discretion in denying Higgins's

second and third motions to amend his complaint to reflect the true names of the John

Does. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 823 F.2d 214, 216 (8th Cir. 1987) (standard of

review). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in deciding the

matter was ripe for summary judgment, despite Higgins's plea for additional discovery.

See Dulany v. Carnahan, 132 F.3d 1234, 1238 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review;

non-movant asserting need for further discovery must "show what specific facts further

discovery might unveil"). Finally, the district court's grant of summary judgment was

proper because Higgins's conclusory affidavits and pleadings were insufficient to

withstand summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e); City of Canton v. Harris, 489

U.S. 378, 388-90 (1989) (municipal liability for failure to train or supervise); Andrews

v. Fowler, 98 F.3d 1069, 1078 (8th Cir. 1996) (individual liability for supervisor's

failure to train or supervise).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment and deny as moot Higgins's

motion for appointment of counsel.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 4(a)



                                                                  March 25, 1999


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Subject:   General  Electric Capital  Services, Inc.  Annual Report on Form 10-K
           for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 - File No. 0-14804


Dear Sirs:

Neither General Electric Capital Services,  Inc. (the  "Corporation") nor any of
its  subsidiaries  has  outstanding any instrument with respect to its long-term
debt that is not  registered  or filed with the  Commission  and under which the
total  amount of  securities  authorized  exceeds 10% of the total assets of the
registrant and its  subsidiaries  on a consolidated  basis.  In accordance  with
paragraph (b) (4) (iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR  ss.229.601),  the
Corporation hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange  Commission,
upon request,  a copy of each instrument  which defines the rights of holders of
such long-term debt.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.


                                    By:  /s/  J.A. Parke
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         J.A. Parke,
                                         Senior Vice President, Finance
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Devante Dewayne Maxwell, * From the 142nd District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR40292.

Vs. No. 11-14-00073-CR * December 11, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered Devante Dewayne Maxwell’s motion for nonsuit and 

dismissal of his appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.