alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11

     STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                  Three Months      Nine Months
                                      Ended            Ended
                                 Sept. 30, 1996    Sept. 30, 1996
                                 --------------    --------------

    Net  Income (Loss)             $(449,314)        $398,706
                                   ==========        ========

    Weighted average
    shares outstanding             1,253,380        1,259,670

    Common stock
    equivalents due to dilutive
    effect of stock options           50,900           50,426
                                   ---------        ---------
    Total weighted average
    common shares and
    equivalents outstanding        1,304,280        1,310,096
                                  ==========        =========

    Primary earnings (loss)
    per share                          $(.34)            $.30
                                      ======             ====
    Total weighted average
    common shares and
    equivalents outstanding
    for  primary computation       1,304,280        1,310,096

    Additional dilutive
    shares using the end of
    period market value versus
    the  average market value
    when applying the treasury
    stock method                         -                -
                                  ---------          --------

    Total weighted average
    common shares and
    equivalents outstanding for
    fully diluted computation      1,304,280        1,310,096
                                  ==========        =========

    Fully diluted
    earnings per share                 $(.34)            $.30
                                       ======            ====

    *Note:  If average share price is greater than the ending
            price, use average price for both primary and fully
            diluted calculation.
January 6, 2014
Mr. Kevin Adams U. S. DepartmentofTransportation Office ofthe Secretary ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington DC 

### 20590 

### Re: Requestfoil' CommentatWaterloo Dear Mr. Adams: 

### -- 

### '

This letter is in response to your correspondence dated December 3, 2013, requesting comment on American Airlines Essential Air Service (EAS) application to serve Waterloo. As I understand from your letter, Waterloo received 1 proposal to provide Essential Air Service to our area. This proposal was for continued American Airlines service between Chicago's O'Hare International Airport (ORD) and Waterloo Regional Airport, (ALO).
;v In examining American's latest proposal, their required subsidy has been reduced by almost40% versus their 2011 proposal. This improvement is indicative ofthe potential for air service growth atWaterloo. We supportAmerican's application to serve Waterloo and the broader CedarValley area. We look forward to a long relationship where American can grow their presence from the Waterloo Regional Airport, supporting economic growth from our region.

BC/mmw
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 121 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 121

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 7776, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following correction: Amend the long 
title so as to read: ``An Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal 
year 2023 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for 
military construction, and for defense

              

 activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military 
personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 121

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
          correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 7776.
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 Exhibit 99.01


Contact:  David Zynn, CPA
          Chief Financial Officer
          SMT Health Services Inc.
          (412) 933-3300
          http://www.smthealth.com



                  SMT HEALTH SERVICES INC. CLARIFIES PREVIOUS
                        SHELF REGISTRATION ANNOUNCEMENT


Pittsburgh, PA, August 2, 1996 -- SMT Health Services Inc. (NASDAQ/NMS:  SHED,
SHEDW) today clarified a misinterpretation in the market related to its previous
July 16, 1996 press release announcing the effectiveness of a Form S-3 shelf
registration statement.  The Company clarified that the Form S-3 shelf
registration statement does not represent an offering of securities by the
Company.  The Form S-3 shelf registration statement, declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 12, 1996, simply provided
registration rights to previously outstanding unregistered securities.  In
total, the shelf registration statement covers 3,494,623 shares of Common Stock,
including approximately 1.8 million shares related to the Company's publicly-
traded Warrants.  Approximately 2.7 million of the total shares covered by the
registration statement had been previously registered.

SMT Health Services Inc., through its fleet of fourteen mobile MRI units,
provides diagnostic imaging services to healthcare providers in Pennsylvania,
West Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia and Kentucky.



                                 #     #     #
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-15-0492 SAT Date: 6/5/2015 Print Date: 7/7/2015

Related cases : Yes Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 2 1 PMN 3 2 1

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; PMN negl; Keywords : Keywords: LIVER; KIDNEY; THYROID; DEVEL, REPRO. AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-15-0492 FATE: with MP < 25 °C (E) log Kow = 5.97 (E) S = 0.587 mg/L at 25 °C (E), Reacts slowly
VP = 5.1 torr at 25 °C ( N OMO5) BP = 140-160 °C (Analogs) H = 1.59E-1 (E) log Koc = 3.68 (E)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 605 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 605

       Providing for sufficient time for legislation to be read.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 3, 2020

Mr. Paul submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Providing for sufficient time for legislation to be read.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. TIME FOR READING OF LEGISLATION.

    (a) In General.--It shall not be in order for the Senate to 
consider any bill, resolution, message, conference report, amendment 
between the Houses, amendment, treaty, or other measure or matter until 
1 session day has passed since introduction for every 20 pages included 
in the measure or matter in the usual form plus 1 session day for any 
number of remaining pages less than 20 in the usual form.
    (b) Point of Order.--
            (1) In general.--Any Senator may raise a point of order 
        that consideration of any bill, resolution, message, conference 
        report, amendment, treaty, or other measure or matter is not in 
        order under subsection (a). A motion to table the point of 
        order shall not be in order.
            (2) Waiver.--Paragraph (1) may be waived or suspended only 
        by an affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly 
        chosen and sworn. All motions to waive under this paragraph 
        shall be debatable collectively for not to exceed 3 hours 
        equally divided between the Senator raising the point of order 
        and the Senator moving to waive the point of order or their 
        designees. A motion to waive the point of order shall not be 
        amendable.
    (c) Constitutional Authority.--This resolution is adopted pursuant 
to the power granted to each House of Congress to determine the Rules 
of its Proceedings in article I, section 5, clause 2 of the 
Constitution of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Scott D. Dalesandro, et al.,

 Plaintiffs

v. Case No. 1:01-cv-109

International Paper Company,

 Defendant 

______________________

AMENDED ORDER

______________________

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Admission of attorney

Mildred Bennett Wells (Doc. 81).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Motion is GRANTED and attorney

Mildred Bennett Wells is hereby admitted to practice pro hac vice as co-counsel on

behalf of Plaintiffs.

All attorney(s) admitted to practice in this Court are ORDERED to contact

the clerk’s office at: Ms. Lisa Wright at 614.719.3222, to register for Electronic

Case Filing as soon as practicable.

November 22, 2004 s/Sandra S. Beckwith 

Date Sandra S. Beckwith, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 86 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 1 of 1
Case: 3:17-cv-00076-WHR Doc #: 18 Filed: 05/22/17 Page: 4 of 5 PAGEID #: 101

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
DAYTON DIVISION

CHERI SAMWORTH, on behalf of natural CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00076-WHR

minor child HUNTER MATTHEW

SAMWORTH, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

Plaintiff,
A

COCHLEAR LIMITED, an Australian Public
company and COCHLEAR AMERICAS

)
)
)
)
}
)
)
)
)
)
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, }
)

Defendants.

AGREED ORDER
This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion to Stay the proceedings in this matter
pending a mediation, which is currently scheduled for July 26-27, 2017. Said Motion is hereby
GRANTED. The parties are ordered to submit a status report to the Court no later than August
10, 2017. The stay may be automatically lifted by any party without further order by the Court
upon filing of a written notice with the Court informing the Court and all other parties that
mediation has been unsuccessful. In the event that the stay is lifted by one of the parties,
Cochlear Limited’s and Cochlear Americas Corporation’s responses to the Complaint will be due

thirty (30) days following their receipt of the written notice.

ENTERED this the 23¢Q, day of May, 2017.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3179397.1


Case: 3:17-cv-00076-WHR Doc #: 18 Filed: 05/22/17 Page: 5 of 5 PAGEID #: 102

AGREED:

Penny Unkraut Hendy

Ronald Edward Johnson, Jr.

SCHACHTER HENDY & JOHNSON, P.S.C.

909 Wright’s Summit Parkway

Suite 210

Fort Wright, KY 41011

Telephone: 859.578.4444

Facsimile: 859.578.4440

E-mail: phendy@pschachter.com
rjohnson@pschachter.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Cheri Samworth,
on behalf of natural minor child Hunter
Matthew Samworth

/s/ Clifford S, Mendelsohn

Clifford S. Mendelsohn (0074265)
TUCKER ELLIS LLP

950 Main Avenue

Suite 1100

Cleveland, OH 44113-7213

Telephone: 216.592.5000

Facsimile: 216.592.5009
E-mail:clifford.mendelsohn@tuckerellis.com

Attorney for Defendants, Cochlear Limited
and Cochlear Americas Corporation

3179397.1
#### Hudspeth *v.*State.

Crim. 4053

Opinion delivered October 4, 1937.

*577*Jack JUoIt;*Attorney General, and *John P. Streepey,*Assistant, for appellee.

Smith, J.

Appellant was convicted upon the charge of sodomy, alleged to have been committed by having carnal intercourse with a certain beast, to-wit, a cow.

The conviction occurred at a second trial at the same term of court, and the action of the court in ordering this second trial at the same term is assigned as error. No prejudice is shown by this action of the court. It was expressly authorized by § 3194, Crawford & Moses’ Digest, which provides that “In all cases where a jury is discharged, either in the progress of a trial or after the cause is submitted to them, the cause may again be tried at the same or another term of the court.”

It is urged that the testimony is insufficient to sustain the conviction, the specific contention being that the testimony failed to prove penetration. Proof of this fact is required to sustain a conviction. Section 2745, Crawford & Moses’ Digest. But this is a fact which may be proved by circumstantial evidence, provided the inferences to be deduced from the circumstances proved leave no reasonable doubt upon the subject. *State*v. *Gage,*139 Ia. 401, 116 N. W. 596.

The disgusting testimony may be briefly summarized as follows. A boy reported to a patrolman that something was going on at Gann’s barn. This officer, accompanied by another officer and the boy, went to the barn. When they arrived there they heard someone say, “Saw, saw, God damn you, saw.” Someone was standing behind a cow. There was a tub turned upside down behind the cow. The cow was chained to a brace in the barn so tightly that there was no play in the chain. A light was flashed, thereupon the man standing behind the cow ran. He ran into a fence and was knocked down by the impact. His pants were unbuttoned, and there *578was wet cow dung all over his clothes and the hairs around his private parts. This man was appellant.

This testimony clearly supports the finding’ that appellant was in the act of having carnal knowledge of a cow, and had so far accomplished his purpose as to effect penetration.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies
that, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| |  |  | /s/ Glenn J. RufranoGlenn J. Rufrano
Chief Executive Officer
March 4, 2005
| |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | /s/ John B. RocheJohn B. Roche
Chief Financial Officer
March 4, 2005      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to New Plan Excel Realty
Trust, Inc. and will be retained by New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit
32**
  **Certification
Pursuant to**
  **18
U.S.C. Section 1350**
  
  In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of General Electric Capital
Services, Inc. (the “registrant”) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Dennis D. Dammerman and James A. Parke,
Chairman of the Board and Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:
  
  (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      registrant.
 
  
  May
      6, 2005/s/
      Dennis D. DammermanDennis
      D. Dammerman
      Chairman
      of the Board/s/
      James A. ParkeJames
      A. Parke
      Vice
      Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

DIRECTORS OF THE OHIO
CONFERENCE OF PLASTERERS

AND CEMENT MASONS
COMBINED FUNDS, INC., :
Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:18-cv-00122
v. JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
MEERKAT CONSTRUCTION,
INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT, MEERKAT CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
TO PROVIDE TO PLAINTIFFS’ ACCOUNTANT, NO LATER THAN
MARCH 4, 2020, THE FOLLOWING: (1) ALL RECORDS AND
DOCUMENTS REQUESTED BY PLAINTIFFS’ ACCOUNTANT THAT
ARE IN THE POSSESSION, CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF MEERKAT
CONSTRUCTION, INC.; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT SIGNED BY MEERKAT
CONSTRUCTION, INC. UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT IT
HAS MADE A DILIGENT AND THOROUGH SEARCH OF ALL
RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS REQUESTED BY PLAINTIFFS’
ACCOUNTANT AND THAT ALL RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS IN
DEFENDANT'S POSSESSION, CUSTODY OR CONTROL HAVE BEEN
PRODUCED; (3) SAID RECORDS, DOCUMENTS AND AFFIDAVIT
ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY MEERKAT CONSTRUCTION, INC. TO ITS
COUNSEL FOR DELIVERY TO PLAINTIFFS’ ACCOUNTANT;
FAILURE ON THE PART OF MEERKAT CONSTRUCTION, INC. TO
COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER IN ANY RESPECT WILL RESULT INA
MINIMUM INITIAL FINE OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00)
PER DAY BEGINNING MARCH 5, 2020

This matter came before the Court for a hearing on February 26, 2020. The

hearing, which was scheduled by the Court, was to determine why the payroll


audit of the records and books of Defendant, Meerkat Construction, Inc., for the
period of April 2016 through July 19, 2019, had not been completed as previously
ordered by this Court in its Decision and Entry of July 19, 2019. Doc. #20. In
attendance at this hearing were counsel for the parties as well as Kevin Thomas,
President of Defendant, Meerkat Construction, Inc. An accountant retained by
Plaintiffs, David Coomer, C.P.A., of Clark Schaeffer Hackett, testified, via
telephone, regarding the status of the payroll audit and the books and records
produced to date by Meerkat Construction, Inc. Mr. Coomer was examined by
counsel for both parties as well as the Court.

Based upon the testimony of Mr. Coomer, as well as the arguments of
counsel, the Court ORDERS Defendant, Meerkat Construction, Inc., to provide to
Plaintiffs’ accountant, David Coomer, C.P.A., no later than March 4, 2020, the
following:

(1) all records and documents that are requested by Mr. Coomer, in the
possession, custody or control of Defendant, Meerkat Construction, Inc.;

(2) an affidavit signed by Meerkat Construction, Inc., under penalty of
perjury, stating that it has made a diligent and thorough search of all records and
documents, in its possession, custody or control that were requested by Mr.
Coomer, and that said records and documents have been produced to him;

(3) said records, documents and affidavit are to be provided by Meerkat

Construction, Inc. to its counsel for delivery to Mr. Coomer.


FAILURE ON THE PART OF MEERKAT CONSTRUCTION, INC. TO COMPLY
WITH THIS ORDER IN ANY RESPECT WILL RESULT IN THIS COURT IMPOSING A
MINIMUM INITIAL FINE OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) PER DAY

AGAINST MEERKAT CONSTRUCTION, INC. BEGINNING MARCH 5, 2020.

Date: February 27, 2020 tae WD

WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 

### Whalen, Marilyn

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 2:41 PM

To: Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.haw aii.gov); roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov

Cc: Kishaba, Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Shim abuku, June T. CIV N AVFAC HI, EV4; Ueda,

Jill T CIV NAVFAC HI, HIEV4; Mizuno, Arleen M CIV NAVFAC HI, PRJ412; Nakamura, Peter

M CIV NAVFAC HI, EV1; Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; Lovgren, Andrew C LT

NAVSUP, 700; stuart.yamada@doh.hawa ii.gov; steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov;

joanna.seto@doh.hawaii.gov; Linder, Steven; Pallarino, Bob

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - JUN 24, 2014

Importance: High

Hi Richard/Roxanne:

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of June 24, 2014. In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be

annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan

a. Item 1

‐ Models to estimate downward vertical migration of free product.

b. Item 2

‐ Methods or options for non

‐ invasive scanning of basalt to determine area and volume of contaminant

mass prior to any drilling investigation.

The award for the vertical migration modeling for various release scenarios ongoing.

c. Item 3

‐ Methods and locations for borings to most efficiently characterize the extent of contamination.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1

‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation

of release point(s) within Tank 5.

Results of nondestructive testing identified fifteen defects in the tank wall. Hydrostatic testing of piping is currently

being performed.

b. Action 2

‐ The rate of vertical migration for the released JP

‐ 8 free product is unknown. Information from the

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration. This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination. Prepare models for petroleum JP

‐ 8 releases of 10,000,

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5. Progress in developing

these models should be included in the preliminary work plan.

c. Action 3

‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP

‐ 8 free product. Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.

d. Action 4

‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex. This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.2 The Navy and DLA are reviewing the draft Agreement on Consent and Statement of Work. Due to the multiple levels of

review required, at least 3 weeks are needed to provide a response to the DOH and EPA.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Vr,

Aaron