alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NT Holding Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the
period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James Loo, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 30, 2006

/S/ James Loo
James Loo,
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 737 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 737

   Expressing support for the designation of September 30, 2020, as 
             ``National Veterans Suicide Prevention Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2020

    Mr. Kaine (for himself, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Tester) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing support for the designation of September 30, 2020, as 
             ``National Veterans Suicide Prevention Day''.

Whereas the wounds sustained through armed service to the United States are both 
        visible and invisible;
Whereas the wounds sustained through armed service to the United States may be 
        invisible, but those wounds are treatable if the bearers of those wounds 
        are connected to the right resources;
Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense have 
        determined that an average of nearly 20 current or former members of the 
        Armed Forces die by suicide each day;
Whereas veterans account for a disproportionate percentage of all adult suicides 
        in the United States;
Whereas the surviving family members of veterans who succumb to the invisible 
        wounds of armed service to the United States must not be forgotten and 
        isolated but instead must be directed to available resources and 
        support;
Whereas, after the loss of a veteran family member to the invisible wounds of 
        armed service to the United States, the family members of that veteran 
        must not lose their link to the support and strength of the military and 
        veteran communities;
Whereas the families of veterans who die by suicide hold valuable ``lessons 
        learned on the lookback'' that can be used to prevent future suicides in 
        veteran populations;
Whereas the voices of the surviving family members of veterans who die by 
        suicide are useful and should be leveraged in prevention efforts;
Whereas the need for formal recognition of the families of veterans who succumb 
        to the invisible wounds of armed service to the United States is vital 
        to the strength, health, and survival of the veteran community;
Whereas those families should be recognized, supported, and heard on National 
        Veterans Suicide Prevention Day and throughout the year; and
Whereas September 30, 2020, is an appropriate day to designate as ``National 
        Veterans Suicide Prevention Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation of September 30, 
2020, as ``National Veterans Suicide Prevention Day''.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 11 Filed: 05/30/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 137
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 11 Filed: 05/30/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 138
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4485 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4485

To require transfer of the 1002 Area of Alaska to the State of Alaska, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2010

Mr. Hall of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
  Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require transfer of the 1002 Area of Alaska to the State of Alaska, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Resources for Domestic 
Consumption Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to provide for the expeditious 
development of oil, natural gas, and other resources of the 1002 Area 
of Alaska by transferring to the State of Alaska all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to such area.

SEC. 3. TRANSFER OF 1002 AREA TO STATE OF ALASKA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall within 30 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act transfer to the State of Alaska all right, title, 
and interest of the United States in and to the 1002 Area of Alaska, 
subject to the condition in subsection (b).
    (b) Condition.--As a condition of any transfer under this section, 
the Secretary shall require the State of Alaska to pay to the United 
States 50 percent of all amounts received by the State of Alaska as a 
result of development of oil, natural gas, and other natural resources 
of the 1002 Area of Alaska.

SEC. 4. PROHIBITION ON EXPORT OF OIL.

    No oil produced in the 1002 Area of Alaska after the date of any 
transfer under section 3 may be exported from the United States.

SEC. 5. 1002 AREA OF ALASKA DEFINED.

    In this Act, the term ``1002 Area of Alaska'' means the area 
described in appendix I to part 37 of title 50, Code of Federal 
Regulations, as in effect on July 14, 2008, popularly known as the 
Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.3





AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of March 15, 2011 (the “Amendment”) by and between ACORN ENERGY, INC., a Delaware corporation (with its successors and assigns, referred to as the “Corporation”) and JOHN A. MOORE hereinafter referred to as “Moore.”





Preliminary Statement





The Corporation and Moore previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of March 4, 2008 (the “Agreement”), and the Corporation and Moore hereby desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.





Agreement





Moore and the Corporation therefore agree as follows:





1.           Extension of Term.  The first sentence of Section 1, Commencement of Employment Term, is hereby amended to delete the phrase “third anniversary of the date hereof” and substitute in its place “the fourth anniversary of the date hereof.”





2.           Adjustment of Base Salary.  The first two sentences of Section 3(a) Compensation, Base Salary, are hereby amended to provide that effective November 1, 2010, Moore’s base salary shall be $300,000 per annum.





3.           Ratification.  Moore and the Corporation hereby ratify and confirm the terms of the Agreement as amended hereinabove.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.





JOHN A. MOOREACORN ENERGY, INC.By:Joe B. Cogdell, Jr.Vice President, General Counsel & SecretaryBy:Richard Giacco, Director on behalfof the Board of Directors
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA-2015 - 1985 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM214AD

8 - 24 - 84, REV C --- 7/7/09 8 - 24 - 84, REV B --- 10/15/08 8 - 24 - 84, REV A --- 8/23/08 8 - 24 - 84 --- 8/22/08 8 - 24 - 89, REV B --- 4/9/14 8 - 24 - 89, REV A --- 8/8/12 8 - 24 - 89 --- 11/12/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH 

INSTUTUTE, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

LARRY HOUSEHOLDER, Speaker of 

the Ohio House of Representatives, et al.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 Case No. 1:18-cv-357

 

 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF 

 ADDRESS

Judge Timothy S. Black

Judge Karen Nelson Moore

Judge Michael H. Watson

 Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The undersigned counsel for Legislative Defendants in the above-captioned matter, having 

previously entered an appearance in this action, hereby give notice to the Court and to all parties 

of record of the change in counsel’s office address, as indicated below:

PHILLIP J. STRACH (phil.strach@ogletree.com)

MICHAEL D. MCKNIGHT (michael.mcknight@ogletree.com)

BRODIE D. ERWIN (brodie.erwin@ogletree.com)

ALYSSA M. RIGGINS (alyssa.riggins@ogletree.com)

 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

8529 Six Forks Road, Forum IV, Suite 600

Raleigh, NC 27615

Tel.: (919) 787-9700

Facsimile: (919) 783-9412

The undersigned respectfully requests that the Clerk of the Court and counsel of record 

make note of this change on their service lists.

DATED: January 27, 2020 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

/s/ Alyssa M. Riggins

Phillip J. Strach

Michael D. McKnight

Brodie D. Erwin

Alyssa M. Riggins

Counsel for Legislative Defendants

 

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 294 Filed: 01/27/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 23857
Exhibit






[COMERICA LETTERHEAD]










October 13, 2015




Wells Fargo Shareowner Services
Attn: Matt Paseka
1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101
Mendota Heights, MN  55120


Re: Appointment of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Successor Warrant Agent


Dear Matt:


As you are aware, Comerica Incorporated and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC are parties to that certain Warrant Agreement dated as of June 9, 2010 (the “Warrant Agreement”), originally entered into by and between Sterling Bancshares, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC.   


In accordance with the terms of the Warrant Agreement, Comerica Incorporated has removed American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as of October 31, 2015.  Pursuant to Section 5.06 of the Warrant Agreement, Comerica Incorporated hereby appoints Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as the Warrant Agent under the Warrant Agreement effective as of November 2, 2015.  


Please acknowledge your acceptance of such appointment by executing this letter where indicated below and returning a fully executed copy of this letter to the attention of the undersigned.


Sincerely,
Comerica Incorporated


By:    /s/ James J. Herzog
Name:    James J. Herzog
Title:    EVP and Treasurer


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:    
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


By:     /s/ Andrea Severson
Name:    Andrea Severson
Title:    AVP - Client Services
1 (h) The Chanc ell or sha ll reduce the Chanc ell or’s findi ngs of fa ct a nd concl usions of l aw to wri ti ng

and make them par ts of the recor d.



### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE June 27, 200 2 Session ROY JONES v. PERRY SPURLING, ET AL 

### . Appeal from the Chancery Court for Morgan County No. 98-145 Frank V. Williams, III, Chancellor

FILED JULY 22, 2002 No. E2001-02875-COA-R3-CV

This is a suit by Roy Jones, a tenured teacher in the Mor

gan County

School Syste

m, against Perry Spurling, Keith Adcock, Cassandra Duncan, Debbie Lively, and ConradStrand, Members of the Morgan County Board of Education, Paul Scarbrough, Superintendent of the Morg an County Schools, and the Morgan County Board of Education. The sui t seeks, by means of a writ of certior ari, to overturn a determination of the Board that Mr. Jone s’ employment should be terminated because of an altercation betwee n him and a student. We vacate and remand. Tenn.R.App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right ; Judgment

of the Cha

ncery Court Vaca

ted; Cause Remanded
H OUSTON M. G ODDARD , P.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which C HARLES D. S USANO , J R ., and D. M ICHAEL S WINEY , JJ., joined. David H. Dunaway, LaFollette, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Roy Jones Robert S. Olive, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellees, Perry Spurling, Keith Adcock, Cassandra Duncan, Debbie Lively, and Conrad Strand, Members of the Morgan County Board of Education, Paul Scarbrough, Superintendent of the Morgan County Schools, and the Morgan County Board of Education. OPINION

The Chancellor

upheld Mr. Jones’ dismissal, resulting in this appeal where the determinative issue is whethe

r the Chan

cellor sh ould have

reduce d his findin gs of fac t and conc lusions of law to writing and made them a part of the record, as ma ndated by T.C.A. 49-5-513(h). 1-2-

The Defend ants in the

ir brief , and thei r counsel in oral argument, concede that there is merit in Mr. Jones’ position and agree that the case must be remande d to give the Chancellor an opportunity to correct his oversight.
Mr. Jones raises a second issue, complaining that the Chancellor failed to act upon his motion to amend his complain

t. Upon re

mand Mr. J ones’ co

unsel will have an opportuni

ty to call this point to the Chancellor’s attention and obtain a ruling on the motion to amend.
For the foregoing reasons the judgment below is vacated and the c ase re mande d to enabl e the Chancellor to supplement the judgment entered in accordance with the requirements of T.C.A. 49-5-513(h). Exercising our discretion, we do not adjudge costs of a ppeal.

_________________________________________ HOUSTON M. GODDARD, PRESIDING JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, David R. Odenath, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer and President of American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2006



/s/ David R. Odenath, Jr.Name:

David R. Odenath, Jr.Title:

Chief Executive Officer and President


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned David E. Trine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|      | (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |
|                     | (2)      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                    |                                |
|--------------------|--------------------------------|
|               |                           |
| May 8, 2009        | /s/ David E. Trine             |
|               |                                |
|     | David E. Trine                 |
|               | Chief Financial Officer        |
|               | Premiere Global Services, Inc. |

----
1 The Honorable Barry S. Schermer, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3485

___________ In re: Robert P. Ciralsky, * * Debtor, * ---------------------------------- * Robert P. Ciralsky, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel * for the Eighth Circuit. John V. LaBarge, Jr., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 27, 2003 Filed: June 3, 2993 Corrected 6/30/03

___________ Before MORRIS S. ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Robert P. Ciralsky (Ciralsky) appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP) order affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 denials of Ciralsky’s motions for reinstatement of his bankruptcy case and for reconsideration. Ciralsky challenges the-2- bankruptcy court’s refusal to reinstate his case, arguing he had not appeared at the confirmation hearing, where the court granted Trustee John LaBarge’s motion to dismiss his case, because he reasonably believed the hearing had been postponed. He also argues that the bankruptcy court should have allowed a non-lawyer named Susan Foerster (Foerster) to appear on his behalf when he was ill. We conclude the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in declining to reinstate the case: although Ciralsky may have been confused about the hearing schedule, he did not appear at the scheduled confirmation hearing and he was admittedly behind on payments at the time the case was dismissed. See In re Svoboda , 264 B.R. 190, 195 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review); 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c) (after notice and hearing, court may dismiss case for cause, including failure to make plan payments); cf. Mullen v. Galati , 843 F.2d 293, 294 (8th Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (holding, where claims were dismissed for party’s failure to appear at scheduled hearings, that dismissal with prejudice is severe sanction but may be warranted for persistent failure to prosecute complaint). We also conclude Ciralsky raised no arguments for reconsideration of the bankruptcy court’s denial of reinstatement, see In re Svoboda , 264 B.R. at 195 (finding no abuse of discretion where post-judgment motion simply rehashed factor that bankruptcy court had already taken into account), and the court properly ruled that Foerster could not appear on Ciralsky’s behalf, seeMo. Rev. Stat. § 484.010 (2000) (defining practice of law); cf. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9010(a) (who may appear in case and perform acts not constituting practice of law). Accordingly, we affirm.-3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
DATED: June 26, 2018 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WILLIAM SPARKS, : 

 : Case No. 2:18-cv-456 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 v. : 

 : Magistrate Judge Deavers 

ZANESVILLE METROPOLITAN : 

HOUSING AUTHORITY, : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

ORDER 

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s May 31, 2018, Report and 

Recommendation which recommended that the Court dismiss the action for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 2) 

The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that the failure to object 

results in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation 

de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court 

adopting the Report and Recommendation. (Id. at 4). The parties have failed to file any 

objections, and the deadline for objections (June 14, 2018) has lapsed. 

 The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on the independent 

consideration of the analysis therein. The action is DISMISSED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - FEBRUARY 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K - FISCAL YEAR 1998 - LAROCHE INDUSTRIES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                          12,884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,236
<ALLOWANCES>                                       527
<INVENTORY>                                     36,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,033
<PP&E>                                         321,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,048
<BONDS>                                        207,418
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,505
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   405,414
<SALES>                                        381,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               381,014
<CGS>                                          319,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  319,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,452)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,653)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,799)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (12,290)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>