alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ JOHN P. BYRNESJohn P. Byrnes Chief Executive Officer


May 10, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANA EVERETT YOUNG,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 841 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Landfair v. Lowman.

Attachments: *Affidavit upon belief: Irregularity waived.*

An affidavit for attachment made upon belief only, although defective is not a nullity, and by a failure to object to its sufficiency in the court beiow, the defoct is vraired and cannot be made available on appeal.

APPEAL from *Desha*circuit court.

John A. Williams, Judge.

Cockrill, C. J.

The facts in this case and in that of *Lehman & Sons v. Lowman & Bro.,*ante, are the same so far as the question raised by the appeal is concerned, except in this, viz : The affidavit for attachment in this case was made by the plaintiffs’ attorney upon *belief,*as the jurat states, that the matters set forth were- true. The motion to quash was not made upon that ground, and it is evident that the court made the order of quashal for the same reason as in the other case; for here, as in that case, leave was given to the plaintiffs to cause a new order of attachment as of the date of the filing of the separate complaint, thereby affirming the sufficiency of the affidavit. If the objection had been made and sustained by the court on the ground that the affidavit was insufficient, leave to amend and cure the defect, must have been extended to the plaintiffs, as we decided in *Sannoner v. Jacobson,*47 *Ark.,*31, The affidavit was not a nullity, and by failing to object, the defendants waived the irregularity (lb.), and cannot avail themselves of it here for the first time.

Reverse and remand.
exv4w2






Exhibit 4.2








	convert to HTML do not convert as gif or image file. insert Exhibit 4.2 in corner.Place on pn 420 in Y prefix Also convert in color. |
MB            C .£




	CLASS A COMMON STOCK            CLASS A COMMON STOCK |§
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS            SEE REVERSE FOR            OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS            CLEARWIRE CORPORATION
cusip 
FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE CLASS A COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF
$0.0001 EACH OF
CLEARWIRF
CORPORTION
transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized attorney on surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed.
This certificate is not valid until countersigned and
registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.
Dated:
Order entered September 3, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01466-CV

ABRAHAM MAAYEH, Appellant

V.

MARCUS BRIAN CURRY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-13602

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 1, 2020 third motion for an 

extension of time to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and 

extend the time to September 4, 2020. We caution appellant that further extension 

requests will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
Amendment No. 13 to the Incentive Savings Plan


 Exhibit 4.3.14 
 THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO 
 THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. 
 INCENTIVE SAVINGS PLAN 
 WHEREAS, The
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (the “Corporation”) sponsors The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Incentive Savings Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation wishes to amend the Plan to provide that PNC ARCS LLC will be a “participating employer” under the Plan effective January 1, 2008; and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation has the authority under Article XIV to amend the Plan, and the Corporation wishes to amend the Plan as set forth below.

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, effective July 1, 2007, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Annex II (Participating Employers) to the Plan as updated by the Plan Manager is confirmed in the form attached hereto. 

 Executed and adopted by The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. by its duly authorized delegate this
29th day of June, 2007. 
  

	
	 /s/ William E. Rosner

	William E. Rosner
	Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

  

 -1- 







 ANNEX II 
 PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS 
 PNC Bank, N.A. 
 PNC Capital Markets, LLC 
 PNC Alliance, LLC 
 PNC Equity Management Inc. 
 PNC Equipment Finance, LLC 
 PNC Investments, LLC 
 PNC Bank, Delaware 
 Midland Loan Services, Inc. 
 PNC Multifamily Finance, Inc. 
 PNC Mezzanine Management Corp. 
 PNC REIT Holding Corp. 
 Harris Williams & Co. 
 PNC ARCS LLC – Effective January 1, 2008 
 The following entities ceased to be Participating Employers as of September 29, 2006: 
 BlackRock Institutional Management Corporation 
 BlackRock Capital Management, Inc. 
 BlackRock Advisers, Inc. 
 BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. 
 BlackRock Realty Advisors, Inc. 
 BlackRock HPB Management, LLC 
 BlackRock Investments, Inc. 
 State Street Research and Management Company

 State Street Research Investment Services, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       5,019,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,531,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,640,597
<PP&E>                                      34,294,523
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,373,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,209,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,304,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           33,570
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,404,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,209,501
<SALES>                                     13,478,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,606,467
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,487,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,447,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,672,206
<INCOME-TAX>                                   736,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,936,206
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,936,206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Molecular Weight A nalysis for PMN**  **of -**  **DI adduct**

**Summary** : the sample - DI adduct was analyzed by GPC and its molecular weight information was obtained. **Background** : GPC was used to analyze molecular weight of - DI adduct from M a dison Heights for regulatory p urpose. **Results** : The sample was run on Sep. 20, 2014. Calculated molecular weights (relative to polystyrene standards) and distributions are given in Table 1. GPC chromatogram is shown in Figure 1 which shows that only some higher molecular weight polymers were generated and eluted between - mi nutes to - mi nutes . To calculate molecular weights of these new molecules, the GPC chromatogram is integrated as Figure 2. According to the attached slice table, there are no new molecules below 1000 Da and 500 Da. Slice table: see 1409043 IPDI .xlex

Figure 1. GPC chromatograms of - DI adduct and - .

- Figure 2. Integrated GPC chromatogram of - DI adduct Table 1. Molecular weights and distributions



### - DI adduct Injection # Retention Time (min) Mn

(Da) Mw (Da) MP

(D a) Mz

(Da) Polydispersity

(Mw/Mn) 1 - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - Average - - - - - - **Calibration Curve (polystyrene standards)**

**-**

**- Experiment:** 

Sam ple preparation : about 2.5 mg sample was weigh ed and dissolved in 4 ml mobile phase. The sample s olution was kept at room temperature overnight. The insoluble components were filtered out by 0.45 PTFE filters. Instrument: Waters 717 HPLC autosampler Waters 515 pump Colum n oven: CTO - 10AC from Shimadzu Refractive index detector: RID - 6A from Shima dzu Software: Empower from Waters Colum n set: Manufacturer: Agilent Co. Colum ns: two oligomer columns + guard Running conditions: Mobile phase: stabilized THF Colum n temperature: 35C Flow rate: 1ml/min Run time: 25 minutes # of injections: 2 I njection volume: 100 microliter Sam ple concentration: - mg/ml Standards: GPC polystyrene standards from Agilent Please let me know if you have questions. Thanks. Lei
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



By:

/s/    JOHN P. BYRNESJohn P. Byrnes Chief Executive Officer




November 13, 2003
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Richard E. Allen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Annual Report of J.D. Edwards & Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of J.D. Edwards & Company.





/s/     RICHARD E. ALLENChief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Director (principal financial
officer)
|Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph P. Caruso, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and I, Paul S. Weiner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                      | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: August 8, 2006                 | 
|                                      | 
|/s/    Joseph P. Caruso               | 
|Joseph P. Caruso                      | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|Dated: August 8, 2006   | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Paul S. Weiner      | 
|Paul S. Weiner          | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 

|
|
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-56975, 333-67441, 333-83561, 333-45710, 333-68322 and 333-96899 of Cost
Plus, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated March 17, 2003,
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cost Plus, Inc.
and subsidiaries for the year ended February 1, 2003.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
May 1, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01598]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 22-03]


One Banana North America Corp., Complainant v. Hapag-Lloyd AG and 
Hapag-Lloyd (America) LLC, Respondents; Notice of Filing of Complaint 
and Assignment

Served: January 24, 2022.
    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (Commission) by One Banana North America Corp, 
hereinafter ``Complainant,'' against Hapag-Lloyd AG and Hapag-Lloyd 
(America) LLC, hereinafter ``Respondents.'' Complainant is a Florida 
corporation that ships fresh bananas from Central and South America to 
the United States, where it sells them to various wholesalers and 
retailers. Complainant alleges that Respondent Hapag Lloyd AG is a 
German company, Respondent Hapag-Lloyd (America) LLC is a Delaware 
company, and that Respondents are common carriers.
    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C 41102(c), 46 
CFR 545.4 and 545.5, and 46 U.S.C. 41104(a)(10) with regard to the 
movement of refrigerated containers. The full text of the complaint can 
be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/22-03/.
    This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law 
Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding 
shall be issued by January 24, 2023, and the final decision of the 
Commission shall be issued by August 7, 2023.

William Cody,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01598 Filed 1-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF ESSENTIAL RESOURCES, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                        107,771
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 431,094
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   681,183
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              106,012
<PP&E>                        311,605
<DEPRECIATION>                25,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2,546,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,664,310
<BONDS>                       600,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      2,855
<OTHER-SE>                    718,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2,546,692
<SALES>                       1,187,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,187,542
<CGS>                         509,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 600,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              12,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               89,516
<INCOME-TAX>                  32,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           57,516
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  57,516
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.02
<FN>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Essential Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
        

</TABLE>
#### George Marx and James Cahalon, executors for William Quin v. Antoine Labadie, executor for Alexander H. Woodruff.

*Replevin for impounded eattle.*

Comp. L. ch, 214 permitting replevin to be brought for distrained cattle is meant to provide an action wherein the legality of a distress of stray cattle may be tested.

The sums allowed per head for cattle distrained (Comp. L. § 6768) are *606penalties within the meaning of Comp. L. § 6784 which allows the owner of heasts “impounded in order to recover a penalty ” to bring replevin for them.

Error to Wayne. (Jenníson, J.)

Oct. 17.

Oct. 24.

KepleviN. Defendant brings error.

Reversed.

*Stewcart <& Galloway*for appellant.

*Chas. R. Ford*and *Sylvester Learned-*for appellee.

Sheewood, J.

Tbis case was before tbis Court on error at tbe last April term. See 50 Micb. 361. It was tlien decided tbe case should have been dismissed in tbe court below. Tbis course bas not been taken. A second trial bas been bad with substantially tbe same result as in tbe first, and tbe proceedings are now before us for review.

The circuit judge bas evidently misinterpreted the statute, as well as the scope of the opinion filed by Mr. Justice Cooley in tbis case on the former bearing. Chapter 214 of the Compiled Laws was intended to provide an action in which may be tried the legality of the distress made for either of the causes mentioned in the statute. the sums required to be paid by the ownera of beasts distrained, mentioned in section 2 of said chapter, are in the nature of a penalty, and tbis brings the case clearly within section •eighteen.*

We are unable to discover that the second trial bas made any difference in the legal status of the case, and it must abide the former rulings of tbis Court. It is unnecessary to •consider the case further.

*607The judgment must be reversed with costs and a new trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.

*

(6768) Sec. 2. The person so talcing up and distraining the same shall he 'entitled to fifty cents per head for all horses, mules, asses and neat cattle, and ten cents per head for all sheep, goats and swine so distrained ■by him; and the poundkeeper shall be entitled to four cents per head for all the said animals so impounded.

(6784) Sec. 18. Any person whose beasts are distrained or impounded, in order to recover any penalty or forfeiture supposed to have been incurred by their going at large, or to obtain satisfaction for any damages alleged to have been done by them, may have a writ of replevin therefor but of the proper court, and the same proceedings shall be had thereon as in other cases of replevin, except as hereinafter provided.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Scott D. Dalesandro, et al.,

 Plaintiffs

v. Case No. 1:01-cv-109

International Paper Company,

 Defendant 

______________________

AMENDED ORDER

______________________

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Admission of attorney

Mildred Bennett Wells (Doc. 81).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Motion is GRANTED and attorney

Mildred Bennett Wells is hereby admitted to practice pro hac vice as co-counsel on

behalf of Defendant.

All attorney(s) admitted to practice in this Court are ORDERED to contact

the clerk’s office at: Ms. Lisa Wright at 614.719.3222, to register for Electronic

Case Filing as soon as practicable.

November 23, 2004 s/Sandra S. Beckwith 

Date Sandra S. Beckwith, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 87 Filed 11/23/2004 Page 1 of 1