alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>








<ARTICLE>                     5




<MULTIPLIER>                                          1000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              4,822
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     334,252
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  408,159
<PP&E>                                            741,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,359,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             316,726
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        616,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,359,019
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,856,147
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,719,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (1,209)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 15,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   122,704
<INCOME-TAX>                                       49,756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                74,161
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       74,161
<EPS-BASIC>                                          2.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        2.74






</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

 

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

 

COLLEEN GRIFFITH AND 

PATRICK J. DEESE, ESQ., 

 Appellants, 

 CORRECTED 

v. Case No. 5D15-486 

RAMZEY'S A PLUS, INC. 

D/B/A QABLAWI AUTO SALES, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed March 4, 2016 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County, 

George B. Turner, Judge. 

Patrick J. Deese, of Law Offices of Patrick 

J. Deese, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellants. 

Thomas H. Yardley, Cocoa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

 Colleen Griffith and her attorney, Patrick J. Deese, appeal the trial court’s order 

assessing attorney’s fees against them under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 

1.380(a)(4). We affirm. 

 Griffith, on Deese’s advice, refused to answer a deposition question, asserting 

that the question was irrelevant and an improper hypothetical. On appeal, Griffith and 
2

Deese claim that the trial court improperly sanctioned them without making the findings 

required by Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1993). We disagree. Kozel 

applies when the trial court dismisses a case or claim, enters a default, or strikes 

pleadings as a sanction. It does not apply when expenses are assessed, as here, 

under rule 1.380(a)(4). 

 AFFIRMED. 

ORFINGER, COHEN and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

8/7/18 K OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Ohio

Richard White

2:18-cv-159

Josh Vanbibber, et al.

✔ Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED. This case is terminated.

Case: 2:18-cv-00159-GCS-KAJ Doc #: 27 Filed: 08/07/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 126
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>   
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COST PLUS, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 2,
1997 AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 1, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997             NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                             786                     567
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   1,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,557                  72,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,952                  78,291
<PP&E>                                          95,382                  87,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,923                  35,023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,682                 142,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,992                  34,516
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            82                      87
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,226                  84,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,682                 142,028
<SALES>                                         95,819                 150,506
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,819                 150,506
<CGS>                                           62,364                  97,964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,548                 150,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 781                   1,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    490                 (1,597)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       196                   (639)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                294                   (958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       294                   (958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03                  (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 38
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 2 of 15 PAGEID #: 39
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 3 of 15 PAGEID #: 40
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 4 of 15 PAGEID #: 41
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 5 of 15 PAGEID #: 42
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 6 of 15 PAGEID #: 43
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 7 of 15 PAGEID #: 44
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 8 of 15 PAGEID #: 45
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 9 of 15 PAGEID #: 46
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 10 of 15 PAGEID #: 47
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 11 of 15 PAGEID #: 48
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 12 of 15 PAGEID #: 49
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 13 of 15 PAGEID #: 50
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 14 of 15 PAGEID #: 51
Case: 2:18-cv-00483-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 05/17/18 Page: 15 of 15 PAGEID #: 52
Case: 1:18-mj-00279-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:18-mj-00279-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 2 of 9 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 1:18-mj-00279-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 3 of 9 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 1:18-mj-00279-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 4 of 9 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 1:18-mj-00279-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 5 of 9 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 1:18-mj-00279-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 6 of 9 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 1:18-mj-00279-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 7 of 9 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 1:18-mj-00279-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 8 of 9 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 1:18-mj-00279-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 9 of 9 PAGEID #: 9
EX10_1



		

			Exhibit 10.1

		





		
			SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
		

		
			2003 INCENTIVE SHARE AWARD PLAN
		

		
			AMENDMENT NO. 1
		

		
			The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”) has heretofore approved and adopted this Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Senior Housing Properties Trust 2003 Incentive Share Award Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”).
		

		
			The Plan is hereby amended as follows:
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Section IX.C. of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:




		
			C.  Tax Withholding; Section 409A.  To the extent required by law, the Company shall withhold or cause to be withheld income and other taxes incurred by a Participant by reason of a grant of Shares, and, as a condition to the receipt of any grant of Shares, a Participant agrees that if the amount payable to him by the Company in the ordinary course is insufficient to pay such taxes, he shall, upon request of the Company, pay the Company an amount sufficient to satisfy its tax withholding obligations.
		

		
			Without limiting the foregoing, the Compensation Committee may in its discretion permit any Participant’s withholding obligation to be paid in whole or in part in the form of Shares, by withholding from the Shares to be issued to such Participant or by accepting delivery of Shares already owned by him.  The fair market value of the Shares for this purpose shall be the closing price of the Shares on the principal securities exchange on which the Shares are listed on the date such Shares are repurchased by the Company, unless otherwise determined by the Board in its discretion.
		

		
			If payment of withholding taxes is made in whole or in part in Shares, the Participant shall deliver to the Company share certificates registered in his name or other evidence of legal and beneficial ownership of Shares owned by him, fully vested and free of all liens, claims and encumbrances of every kind, duly endorsed or accompanied by stock powers duly endorsed by the record holder of the Shares represented by such share certificates.  If the Participant is subject to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, his ability to pay the withholding obligation in the form of Shares shall be subject to such additional restrictions as may be necessary to avoid any transaction that might give rise to liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
		

		
			It is intended that awards granted under the Plan be exempt from the application of Section 409A of the Code, and the Plan and such awards shall be construed in accordance with that intention.
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			This Amendment shall be effective as of August 25, 2015, including with respect to awards currently outstanding.




			
	
			
				 3.
			

			
	
			
			Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On January 18, 2022, the Department of Justice signed a proposed Settlement Agreement among the United States, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Nami Resources Company, L.L.C., and Vinland Energy, LLC related to the release of fracking fluids into Acorn Fork, in Knox County, Kentucky. The Settlement Agreement requires the defendant to pay $576,206.27, in three installments, to the U.S. Department of the Interior and $6,016.89 to the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the Settlement Agreement. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to Settlement Agreement among the United States, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Nami Resources Company, L.L.C., and Vinland Energy, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-3-10010. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments:
Send them to:By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the Settlement Agreement may be examined at and downloaded from this Justice Department website: 
                    *https://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the Settlement Agreement upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $4.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Lori Jonas, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2022-01356 Filed 1-24-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

 AIR AND RADIATION 

December 29, 2011 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with DuPont on Refrigerant Issues 

FROM: Tad Wysor, EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

This memo documents a meeting held on December 9, 2011 between representatives of DuPont 

and EPA for an update on DuPont’s production plans for the alternative mobile refrigerant HFO1234yf. The meeting attendees from DuPont included Michael Parr and Kevin O’Shea, and from 

EPA included Margo Oge, Drusilla Hufford, Sarah Dunham, Maureen Delaney, Ken Moss, 

Terry Keating, Zuimdie Guerra, Tad Wysor, Edward Nam, and Karen Orehowsky. 

The discussion topics included DuPont’s international commercialization plans for the new 

refrigerant and an update on current and planned production facilities. Non-confidential 

information from DuPont is attached. DuPont also shared confidential business information on 

construction projects and on chemical registration processes, as well as refrigerant demand and 

supply projections. 

Attachment 
2011/12/29 DUPONT CONFIDENTIAL

DuPont OpteonTM Update

December 9, 2011Kevin P. O’SheaGlobal Marketing Manager – OpteonTM yf Autom
Discussion Topics

3⁄4 Update on DuPont OpteonTM Progress 3⁄4 HFO-1234yf Capacity Planning
DuPontTM OpteonTM yffor Mobile Air Conditioning

Developed to meet the European Union Mobile AConditioning (MAC) Directive requirements for 20replacement for HFC-134a.

 GWP of 4, which is 99% lower than HFC- Extensive safety and performance testin Globally accepted for use in mobile air c

by leading automotive OEMs. (SAE CRP1

 Commercially available in 2011

Dedicated web site with content on OpteonTM yf: smartautoac.com
• Japan small lots continues to exceed post-tsuna• China Project Status• China Registration Status• Future capacity plansOpteonTMyf Commercialization Plan
China Plant Construction Photo

November 8
The creation of shareholder and 

value while we reduce t

environmental footprint* alo

value chains in which we op

* DuPont defines “footprint” as all injuries, illnesses, inc

emissions, use of water and depletable forms of raw m

The Mission of DuPont

SUSTAINABLE 

GROWTH
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We have issued our reports dated March 4, 2005, on the consolidated financial
statements and schedule and on internal control over financial reporting
included in the Annual Report of Verso Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Verso Technologies,
Inc. on Forms S-8, file numbers 333-74258, 333-74264, 333-59372, 333-92337,
333-85107, 333-80501, and 333-26015 and Forms S-3, file numbers 333-66292,
333-45028, and 333-108613.


Atlanta, Georgia                              /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
March 25, 2005
David R. Spivey Request for Part 333 Exemption

Exhibit 4 – Q500 Typhoon Ground Station Specifications
#### Cooley *v.*Walther.

5-974

291 S. W. 2d 515

Opinion delivered June 25, 1956.

*Hardin, Barton, Hardin*& *Garner,*for appellant.

*Robert R. Brooksher*and *Donald Poe,*for appellee.

Lee Seamster, Chief Justice.

This is the second time this case has been here on appeal. The facts were set out in the former appeal • — • *Walther*v. *Cooley,*224 Ark. 1027, 279 S. W. 2d 288. In the former case this court held that the evidence was sufficient to make it a question of fact for the jury to determine. Under the rule many • times announced by this court., the decision oh the former appeal becomes the law of the case on this appeal — unless we can say that the testimony on the second appeal is substantially different from that on the first appeal. *Hallum*v. *Blackford,*202 Ark. 544, 151 S. W. 2d 82. The testimony on this appeal is substantially the same as in the .former appeal, with slight variations.

Upon trial of the issues in the Scott Circuit Court, appellee was awarded a judgment in the sum of $1,000, for personal injuries. For reversal, appellant contends (1) that the evidence is not sufficient to support the *613verdict and judgment rendered, and (2) the verdict and judgment in the amount of $1,000 are excessive.

The appellant employed the appellee to assist in constructing a garage on appellant’s property. The ap-pellee was being paid at a rate of sixty cents per hour for his services. On January 5, 1954, the appellee was injured, at a time when the parties herein, and another hired hand, were placing rafters on the partially constructed building.

At the time of the mishap, the appellee was working on the south side of the building, using a scaffold and plate to stand on while nailing the rafters to the plate. When he stepped down from the plate to the scaffold, one of the braces on the scaffold broke and the appellee fell to the ground, landing on his head and shoulders. He sustained a broken rib, injuries to his right eye and fractures to bones of his right hand. At the time of the original trial, the appellee’s right hand still suffered a partial permanent disability, to the extent that he was unable to grasp tools with which to pursue his occupation.

The record reveals that the appellant furnished the tools and material and supervised the construction of the building. The appellant personally built the south scaffold after selecting and furnishing the material. An inspection of the scaffold, after the accident, revealed that the timber used in its construction was defective and caused the break.

This court has many times held that it is a master’s duty to exercise ordinary care to furnish his servant a reasonably safe place to work. *Arkadelphia Sand and Gravel Company*v. *Knight,*190 Ark. 386, 79 S. W. 2d 7l.,

We hold that the evidence was substantial to sustain the verdict. We are also of the opinion that the amount of the verdict was very moderate, considering the injuries sustained by the appellee. ,

Judgment áffirmed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the amended annual report of Zaxis International Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Ivo Heiden, CEO and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo HeidenCEO and CFODated: August 4, 2008

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zaxis International Inc. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : 

Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:18-CR-016 

Judge Thomas M. Rose

vs. 

DALTON LEE JUICK KONAT, 

Defendant. 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING INSPECTION OF EVIDENCE

______________________________________________________________________________ 

Now comes Defendant, Dalton Konat (“Mr.Konat”), through counsel, and respectfully

moves this Court for an order allowing defense expert Dr. Scott Bresler to inspect all relevant 

evidence in this matter to assist with a forensic evaluation for the defense. Counsel for the 

government does not oppose this request, and is willing to provide access for this inspection. 

Case: 3:18-cr-00016-TMR Doc #: 32 Filed: 01/29/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 81
Respectfully submitted, 

DEBORAH L. WILLIAMS 

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER 

s/Thomas W. Anderson, Jr. 

Thomas W. Anderson, Jr (0073138) 

Office of the Federal Public Defender 

1 South Main Street, Suite 490 

Dayton, Ohio 45402 

 (937) 225-7687 Attorney for

 Defendant 

Thomas_Anderson@fd.org

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was served upon the Assistant United States 

Attorney, on the date same was filed. 

s/Thomas W. Anderson, Jr. 

Thomas W. Anderson, Jr. 

Case: 3:18-cr-00016-TMR Doc #: 32 Filed: 01/29/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 82