1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION 

JUANITA CAMPBELL, on behalf of 

herself and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

WISE MEDICAL STAFFING, INC., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:18-CV-00493 

Judge Sarah D. Morrison 

Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson 

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING 

SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff Juanita Campbell (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Wise Medical Staffing, Inc. 

(“Defendant”) jointly move the Court to preliminarily approve their proposed Settlement 

Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) for Plaintiff’s claims brought pursuant to the Fair Labor 

Standards Act (“FLSA”) 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and under the Ohio Overtime Compensation statute, 

Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 4111.03. (ECF No. 54.) The parties seek approval of their proposed class 

definition and Notice of Settlement (“Notice”) to be sent to the putative Class Members. Id. They 

also request a date for the final fairness hearing. Id. 

The Court has reviewed the Settlement Agreement, as well as the Parties’ Joint Motion, 

the Declaration of Attorney Hans Nilges appended thereto, and the pleadings and filings in this 

Action. For good cause established therein, the Court hereby preliminarily approves the Settlement 

Agreement, defines the Settlement Class, preliminarily approves the Notice of Settlement to be 

sent to putative Class Members, appoints class counsel, and sets a final approval hearing as 

follows:

1. On May 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed this Action, alleging that Defendant violated the 

Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio overtime statute by failing to pay Plaintiff and other 
2

similarly situated employees all of their overtime pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in one work 

week.1 Namely, Plaintiff alleged Defendant wrongfully withheld pay for work-related travel time.

2. On January 25, 2019, Defendant filed its Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, in which 

Defendant denied Plaintiff’s material allegations, and that it violated any federal or state law.2

3. On January 30, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Conditional Certification pursuant 

29 U.S.C. § 216(b).3 Defendant filed its opposition on February 20, 2019, and Plaintiff filed her 

Reply in Support on March 6, 2019.4

4. On August 30, 2019, the Parties participated in mediation with Court-appointed 

mediator Richard N. Coglianese. The Parties reached a settlement in principle at mediation.

5. The Settlement Agreement provides for class-wide settlement, claims 

administration, and distribution to class members as represented in the Settlement Agreement. 

Settlement of FLSA claims is subject to approval by the Court pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and 

the class claims under state law are subject to approval pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

23.

6. The issues in this case were contested. A Settlement Agreement was achieved after 

arms-length and good faith negotiations between the Parties and their counsel, who have extensive 

experience litigating FLSA and various state wage and hour claims, with the assistance of a Courtappointed mediator.

7. Having reviewed the Parties’ Settlement Agreement and Joint Motion for 

Preliminary Approval of Settlement, the Court preliminarily holds that the Settlement Agreement 

 1 ECF No. 1.

2 ECF No. 27.

3 ECF No. 30.

4 ECF Nos. 20 and 24.
3

is the product of arms-length negotiations between experienced counsel and was reached after 

substantial investigation of the claims. The Settlement Agreement is therefore preliminarily 

approved under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and Ohio Revised Code § 4111.03. The Settlement Agreement 

is hereby incorporated by reference into this Order and all terms defined in the Settlement 

Agreement will have the same meanings in this Order.

8. For purposes of effectuating this settlement, the Court defines the Settlement Class 

as: 

All present and former home healthcare employees of Wise Medical 

Staffing, Inc. (“Wise”) during the period of time from May 17, 2015 

to until the date of this Order, who were not paid overtime pay for 

all time worked in excess of forty (40) hours in a workweek.

9. With respect to the proposed Settlement Class, this Court preliminarily finds, solely 

for purposes of effectuating the proposed settlement, that certification is appropriate under 

Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. In particular, the 

Court preliminarily finds, solely for purposes of effectuating the proposed settlement, that (a) the 

members of the proposed Settlement Class are so numerous that joinder of all Settlement Class 

members is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the proposed 

Settlement Class; (c) the claims of the proposed representative plaintiff are typical of the claims 

of the proposed Settlement Class; (d) the proposed representative plaintiff and proposed Settlement 

Class Counsel have and will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class; (e) the 

questions of law and fact common to members of the proposed Settlement Class predominate over 

questions affecting only individual members; and (f) a class action is superior to other available 

methods of fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.

10. Plaintiff Juanita Campbell is preliminarily appointed as Class Representative of the 

Settlement Class. Attorneys Hans Nilges, Jeffrey Moyl and Shannon Draher of Nilges Draher, 
4

LLC are preliminarily appointed as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class. Class Counsel have 

engaged in thorough discovery as well as motion practice to investigate and identify potential 

claims in this case. See Nilges Declaration. They have experience in litigating class actions, have 

been lead counsel in other class action cases and possess the skill, experience and qualifications 

necessary to complete the settlement on behalf of the Settlement Class Members. Id. Class Counsel 

will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Class Members for settlement purposes. 

Federal Rs. Civ. P. 23(c)(1)(B) and 23(g) are therefore preliminarily satisfied.

11. Class Counsel will file a motion with the Court on February 3, 2020 requesting an 

award of attorney’s fees, costs and expenses payable to Class Counsel. Class Counsel will include 

within that motion a request for an incentive payment for Plaintiff as Class Representative.

12. The parties shall make the following changes to the proposed Notice and Opt-Out 

Form:

● The parties shall remove the “From” language at the top of page 1. (ECF No. 5402.) 

This shall be replaced with language providing the case caption and number and 

noting that the case is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Ohio.

● The parties shall indicate Wise Medical Staffing, Inc., is the Defendant at the top 

of page one.

● The sentence regarding the potential service award in Paragraph A on page two 

shall be modified to state: “From this, Plaintiff Juanita Campbell may receive a 

Service Payment of up to $3,000, subject to Court approval, . . . .” Id. The sentences 

addressing the amount of attorney’s fees and expenses in that same paragraph shall 

be modified similarly.

● Guidance as to where to send change of address information shall be included at 

the top of page three.

● The parties shall include directions as to where to send opt out forms at the top of 

page three.

● The parties shall add an instruction directly underneath “Please do not Contact the 

Court” stating that the Court cannot provide legal advice on page three.

● The parties shall change “Company” to “Wise” in question four on page four. 

● The answer to question six on page four shall be clarified to indicate that class 

administration fees will also be deducted from the Gross Settlement Amount.

● The first sentence of the opt-out form shall state as follows: “Completing this form 

means you will not receive any money from Wise Medical Staffing, Inc. for alleged 
5

unpaid wages involving this case, but you retain your right to bring your own 

lawsuit and to potentially collect damages from Wise in the future.”

13. Once those alternations are made, the Court finds that the Notice complies with 

Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and with due process, constitutes the best notice 

practicable under the circumstances, and provides due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled 

to notice of the settlement of this Litigation. The Notice provides Settlement Class members with 

sufficient information to make informed decisions regarding their options in this action and the 

effect of the Settlement on their rights. Thus, the Court approves the Notice of Settlement of 

Lawsuit and orders that it be distributed to the Class Members of the classes in the manner 

described in the Settlement Agreement.

14. The Court will conduct a Final Fairness Hearing on February 19, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. 

at 85 Marconi Boulevard, Columbus, Ohio 43215 in Courtroom Five. During the Final Fairness

Hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement Agreement should be approved as fair, 

reasonable, and adequate. The Court will further consider the motion for attorneys’ fees, costs and 

expenses to Class Counsel and the proposed incentive award to the Class Representative. The 

Court will also address the entry of final judgment.

15. The Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class & Collective Action 

Settlement (ECF No. 54) is GRANTED. This case is STAYED pending further proceedings in 

connection with the effectuation of the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Sarah D. Morrison

SARAH D. MORRISON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE