alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 07/14/2015

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Vail Symposium on 07/13/2015

SUMMARY: 

Laura Farris delivered a presentation on the Clean Power Plan on 07/13/2015 at the Vail 

Symposium. The meeting was held in Edwards, Colorado. The Clean Power Plan was proposed 

on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Laura Farris, EPA Region 8

External Stakeholders

General public
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000798783
<NAME> UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,151
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         159,329
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         43,082
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,566
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,552
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.58
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Case No. 3:18-cr-00082

Plaintiff, : District Judge Walter H. Rice

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
vs.

MARTIN CAMPOS-LUNA,

Defendant.
DECISION AND ENTRY

This matter came before the Court for hearing on July 17, 2018 before United States
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, who thereafter issued a Report and Recommendations.
(Doc. #18). Having conducted a full colloquy with Defendant Martin Campos-Luna, the
Magistrate Judge concluded that Defendant’s plea of guilty is knowing, intelligent, and
voluntary, and that there is an adequate factual basis for finding Defendant guilty as the
charged by the Information.

The Court, noting that no Objections to the Report and Recommendations have been
filed and that the time for filing Objections has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report
and Recommendations.

Therefore, based on the aforesaid, and this Court’s de novo review of the record and
the findings by the United States Magistrate Judge, this Court adopts the findings and

recommendations of the United State Magistrate Judge, and finds that Defendant Martin

2


Campos-Luna’s guilty plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent. Final acceptance of

Defendant's guilty plea is deferred pending review of the pre-sentence investigation report.

LR ee >

Walter Herbert Rice
United States District Judge
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7643

TRAVIS HILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department

of Corrections,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-121-3)

Submitted: January 15, 2002 Decided: January 30, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Travis Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) petition. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Hill v. Angelone, No. CA-01-121-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 7,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Cause No 01-09-00328-CV, Samson Lone Star, LP n/k/a Samson Lone Star, LLC v. Hooks et al.

An appeal from the 60th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Court Cause 

No. B173008-B, the Hon. Gary Sanderson, presiding.

On June 15, 2012, appellees moved for rehearing of this Court’s May 31, 2012 opinion in 

this case. It is ordered that the response of the appellants is due Wednesday, August 15, 2012. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually 

Date: July 27, 2012
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Garb Oil & Power Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I John
Brewer, President of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




         Date: 9/20/2002                             By: /s/ John Brewer
                                                         ----------------------
                                                          John Brewer
                                                          President
[ 1 ]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN DIVISION

STEPHANIE LEIGH WHITAKER, 

et al.

 

 Plaintiffs,

v.

JUDGE JOSEPH W. KIRBY,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL COMPLAINT

Case No. 1:18-cv-00540-WOB

JUDGE WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN

NOTICE IN RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER ON OCTOBER 2, 2018

As requested by this Court, Plaintiffs hereby give notice that the brief attached as 

Exhibit A was filed by Plaintiff Whitaker in the Ohio 12th District Court of Appeals. No 

brief in response was filed, and the timeline to file a response brief has passed.

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: October 5, 2018

/s/ Joshua R Langdon

Joshua R. Langdon, Ohio Bar #90956 

Josh Langdon, LLC 

810 Sycamore Street, Fl. 2 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

Phone: (513) 246-1400 

Fax: (513) 263-9000 

E-mail: josh@joshlangdon.com

Shannon Minter* 

Christopher Stoll* 

Asaf Orr* 

National Center for Lesbian Rights 

870 Market Street, Suite 370 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Phone: (415) 392-6257 

Fax: (415) 392-8442 

Case: 1:18-cv-00540-WOB Doc #: 35 Filed: 10/05/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 270
[ 2 ]

sminter@nclrights.org 

cstoll@nclrights.org 

aorr@nclrights.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

* pro hac vice

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joshua Langdon, Esq., do hereby certify that on this 5th day of October, 2018, I 

caused true and correct copies of the foregoing to be filed via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system, causing service on all counsel of record.

By: s/ Joshua R. Langdon

Case: 1:18-cv-00540-WOB Doc #: 35 Filed: 10/05/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 271
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40643

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MARIA ECHAVARRIA-ESPINOZA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:08-CR-202-1

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Maria EchavarriaEspinoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Garcia-Mendez, 420 F.3d 454, 457 (5th Cir.2005), which held that a conviction

under TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(a)(1) for burglary of a habitation is a crime

of violence for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 because it is equivalent to the

enumerated offense of burglary of a dwelling and United States v. CardenasCardenas, ___ F.3d ___, No. 08-40210, 2008 WL 4353084 (5th Cir. Sept. 25,

2008), which held that James v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 1586 (2007) does not

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 5, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40643

undermine our conclusions in Garcia-Mendez. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 118 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 118

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
 present Congressional Gold Medals to the United States Capitol Police 
        and others who protected the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2022

  Ms. Pelosi submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
 present Congressional Gold Medals to the United States Capitol Police 
        and others who protected the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD 
              MEDALS TO UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE AND OTHERS WHO 
              PROTECTED THE CAPITOL ON JANUARY 6, 2021.

    The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on December 6, 
2022, for a ceremony to present Congressional Gold Medals to the United 
States Capitol Police and others who protected the Capitol on January 
6, 2021. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1








 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


to the


PRUDENTIAL SAVINGS BANK


AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the "Amendment") to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Prudential Savings Bank, a Pennsylvania‐chartered, stock-form savings bank (the "Bank"), and Joseph R. Corrato (the "Executive") dated as of October 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), is hereby effective as of November 1, 2015.







WHEREAS, the Executive is presently employed as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank;







WHEREAS, effective October 1, 2015, the Executive and the Bank entered into the Agreement which provided for, among other things, a minimum Base Salary, as such term is defined in the Agreement, during the term of the Agreement;







WHEREAS, the Executive has voluntarily proposed a reduction in his Base Salary as provided for in Section 3(a) of the Agreement in light of the Bank's current operating situation and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has accepted such offer by the Executive;







WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to reflect the mutually agreed upon revision to the Executive's Base Salary; and







WHEREAS, the Executive is willing to serve the Bank on the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements herein contained, the Bank and the Executive do hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:







1.            Section 3(a) of the Agreement be and hereby is rescinded and deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:


 



	 	
3(a)            The Employer shall compensate and pay the Executive for his services during the term of this Agreement at a minimum base salary of $200,632 per year ("Base Salary"), which may be increased from time to time in such amounts as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Employer and may not be decreased without the Executive's express written consent.  In addition to his Base Salary, the Executive shall be entitled to receive during the term of this Agreement such bonus payments as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Employer.

	 





 


2.            All other sections and provisions in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and are incorporated by reference into this Amendment.







[signature page follows]


 


 











 


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement as of the date first written above.




	
ATTEST:

	 	
PRUDENTIAL SAVINGS BANK


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
By:

	/s/Auza Maria Martins	 	
By:

	/s/Francis V. Mulcahy
	
Name:

	
Auza Martins

	 	 	
Francis V. Mulcahy


	
Title:

	
Assistant Corporate Secretary

	 	 	
Chairman of the Compensation


	 	 	 	 	
 Committee of the Board of Directors


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	
EXECUTIVE


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	
By:

	/s/Joseph R. Corrato
	 	 	 	 	
Joseph R. Corrato









 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


2
EXHIBIT 23


                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Joule Inc. and subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-57996) on Form S-8 of Joule Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
December 5, 2003, except as to Note 14 which is as of December 22, 2003 on the
consolidated balance sheets of Joule Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30,
2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows
and changes in stockholders' equity for each of the years in the two-year period
ended September 30, 2003 and our report dated December 5, 2003 on the related
financial statement schedules, which reports appear in the September 30, 2003,
annual report on Form 10-K of Joule Inc.

Our report with respect to the 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements
refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" as of October 1, 2001 and a revision to
the 2001 consolidated financial statements to include related transitional
disclosures.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Short Hills, New Jersey
January 7, 2004
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 119 Filed 12/19/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 119 Filed 12/19/2005 Page 2 of 2
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

James D. Schneller, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 1316 C.D. 2016

:

Prothonotary of Montgomery :

County, individually, and in his :

official capacity, and his employees, :

in their individual and official :

capacities :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, November 8, 2017, having considered appellant’s application 

for reargument, the application is denied.
335 Adams Street, Suite 2700 t: 718 875-1000 www.ibrooklyn.com

Brooklyn, NY 11201 f: 718 237-4274 info@brooklynchamber.com

May 4, 2014

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable John F. Kerry

Secretary of State

US Department of State

2201 C Street NW

Washington, 20520

The Honorable Penny Priztker

Secretary of Commerce

US Department of Commerce

1401 Constitution Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20230

Dear Secretaries Foxx, Kerry and Pritzker:

The Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce (BCC) is a membership-based business assistance organization, 

which represents the interests of over 2,000 member businesses, as well as other businesses across the 

borough of Brooklyn. The Brooklyn Alliance is the not-for-profit economic development organization of 

the Chamber, which works to address the needs of businesses through direct business assistance 

programs. In addition to innumerable economic development initiatives, the Alliance owns and operates 

ExploreBK.com, its tourism initiative that organizes the borough’s tour operators and hospitality 

industry.

Brooklyn, New York hosts roughly 15 million visitors each year. These visitors generate billions of dollars 

in local economic activity and have a direct impact on many of the 50,000 businesses that call Brooklyn 

home. Both John F. Kennedy (JFK) and LaGuardia Airports are essential to our community’s economic 

wellbeing. 

A white paper released in March 2015 by the U.S. Airline and Labor Union Coalition, alleges that over the 

past 10 years, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline have received at least $42 billion in 

government subsidies and other benefits, in violation of the U.S. Open Skies policy. These subsidies for 

state-owned Gulf carriers are contributing to excess capacity, which draws passengers and revenue from 

U.S. airlines. If unchecked, U.S.-based airlines will lose market share, which will lead to service cuts and 

ultimately 800 U.S. job losses around the country.

Given the impact that these claims pose to U.S. airlines, we respectfully ask for your agencies to consider 

analyzing this matter and include solicitation of feedback from all stakeholders involved.
 

335 Adams Street, Suite 2700 t: 718 875-1000 www.ibrooklyn.com

Brooklyn, NY 11201 f: 718 237-4274 info@brooklynchamber.com

JFK and LaGuardia airports are indispensable to economic growth and prosperity in Brooklyn. The 

distortion caused by unfair competition is not in the best interest of the aviation industry or our local 

communities.

I would be more than happy to discuss our views with you in greater detail. Thank you for your attention 

to this important matter.

Very Truly Yours, 

Carlo Scissura

President and CEO

Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce

cc:

Senator Chuck Schumer

Senator Kirsten Gilibrand

Rep. Yvette Clarke

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries

Rep. Nydia Velázquez
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00073-CV

Natin Paul, Individually and as Trustee of the Natin Paul Management Trust Dated 

February 29, 2012, Appellant

v.

HAR-3M, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-21-003079, THE HONORABLE MARIA CANTÚ HEXSEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Natin Paul, individually and as trustee of the Natin Paul Management 

Trust Dated February 29, 2012, has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant 

appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 12, 2023
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 1 of 18 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 2 of 18 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 3 of 18 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 4 of 18 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 5 of 18 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 6 of 18 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 7 of 18 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 8 of 18 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 9 of 18 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 10 of 18 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 11 of 18 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 12 of 18 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 13 of 18 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 14 of 18 PAGEID #: 14
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 15 of 18 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 16 of 18 PAGEID #: 16
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 17 of 18 PAGEID #: 17
Case: 3:18-mj-00317-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 18 of 18 PAGEID #: 18
**AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Steve Snyder-Hill, et al., 

vs. Case No. 2:18-cv-736

The Ohio State University, Judge Michael H. Watson

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the September 22, 2021 Opinion

and Order, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

Date: September 22, 2021 Richard Nagel, Clerk

 s/ Jennifer Kacsor 

By Jennifer Kacsor/Courtroom Deputy

Case: 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD Doc #: 159 Filed: 09/22/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 2777