alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP,

LLC; AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

FALLS AT HIDDEN CANYON

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION;

ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES,

LLC,

Defendants. No. 18

- 15837

D.C. No.

2:15

- cv

- 01287

- RCJ

- NJ K

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 10, 2019 **

Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

Before: BEA, COLLINS, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Las Vegas Development Group, LLC and Airmotive Investments, LLC appeal

the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Nationstar Mortgage LLC.

We assume familiarity with the facts and procedural history and discuss them only

as necessary to ex plain our decision.

The district court granted summary judgment to Nationstar based solely on

the ground that, under Bourne Valley Court Tr ust v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA , 832 F.3d

1154 (9th Cir. 2016) , the homeowners’ association (HOA) foreclosed under a

fa cially unconstitutional notice scheme. Id. at 115 6

. The Ninth Circuit recently

held , however, that Nevada’s HOA foreclosure scheme is not facially

unconstitutional because our decision in Bourne Valley was based on a construction

of Nevada law that the N evada Supreme Court has since made clear was erroneous.

See Bank of Am., N.A. v. Arlington W. Twilight Homeowners Ass’n , 920 F.3d 620

,

6 23

– 24 (9th Cir. 2019) (recognizing that Bourne Valley “no longer controls the

analysis” in light of SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon , 422

P.3d 1248 (Nev. 2018) ).

The judgment in favor of Nationstar is therefore REVERSED. The case is

remanded for further proceedings consistent with this memorandum disposition,

including as to whether Nationstar’s predecessor

- in

- interest properly tendered the3

superpriority amount of the HOA’s lien and , if not, whether the failure to tender w as

nonetheless excused. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.
# Europos Sąjungos C 15I/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 015I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 59 tomas2016m. sausio 16d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 015I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

59 tomas2016m. sausio 16d.

---

| Pranešimo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Pranešimai |
| | EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI |
| | Taryba |
| 2016/C 015I/01 | Informacija apie Tarybos reglamento (ES) 2015/1861, kuriuo iš dalies keičiamas Reglamentas (ES) Nr. 267/2012 dėl ribojamųjų priemonių Iranui, ir Tarybos įgyvendinimo reglamento (ES) 2015/1862, kuriuo įgyvendinamas Reglamentas (ES) Nr. 267/2012 dėl ribojamųjų priemonių Iranui, taikymo pradžios datą | 1 |

Pranešimo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

IV   Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Taryba

2016/C 015I/01

Informacija apie Tarybos reglamento (ES) 2015/1861, kuriuo iš dalies keičiamas Reglamentas (ES) Nr. 267/2012 dėl ribojamųjų priemonių Iranui, ir Tarybos įgyvendinimo reglamento (ES) 2015/1862, kuriuo įgyvendinamas Reglamentas (ES) Nr. 267/2012 dėl ribojamųjų priemonių Iranui, taikymo pradžios datą

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

IV Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Taryba

| 16.1.2016 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2016

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 15/1

---

Informacija apie Tarybos reglamento (ES) 2015/1861, kuriuo iš dalies keičiamas Reglamentas (ES) Nr. 267/2012 dėl ribojamųjų priemonių Iranui, ir Tarybos įgyvendinimo reglamento (ES) 2015/1862, kuriuo įgyvendinamas Reglamentas (ES) Nr. 267/2012 dėl ribojamųjų priemonių Iranui, taikymo pradžios datą

(2016/C 15 I/01)

Tarybos reglamentas (ES) 2015/1861 (1) ir Tarybos įgyvendinimo reglamentas (ES) 2015/1862 (2) įsigaliojo 2015 m. spalio 19 d.

Pagal atitinkamai Reglamento (ES) 2015/1861 ir Įgyvendinimo reglamento (ES) 2015/1862 2 straipsnio antrą pastraipą šie reglamentai taikomi nuo datos, nurodytos Tarybos sprendimo (BUSP) 2015/1863 (3) 2 straipsnio antroje pastraipoje, t. y. nuo Sprendimo (BUSP) 2015/1863 taikymo pradžios datos.

Sprendime (BUSP) 2016/37 (4) Taryba pažymėjo, kad Sprendimo (BUSP) 2015/1863 taikymo sąlyga įvykdyta, ir atitinkamai nusprendė, kad Sprendimas (BUSP) 2015/1863 taikomas nuo 2016 m. sausio 16 d. Todėl Reglamentas (ES) 2015/1861 ir Įgyvendinimo reglamentas (ES) 2015/1862 taip pat taikomi nuo 2016 m. sausio 16 d.

---

(1)  OL L 274, 2015 10 18, p. 1.

(2)  OL L 274, 2015 10 18, p. 161.

(3)  2015 m. spalio 18 d. Tarybos sprendimas (BUSP) 2015/1863, kuriuo iš dalies keičiamas Sprendimas 2010/413/BUSP dėl ribojamųjų priemonių Iranui (OL L 274, 2015 10 18, p. 174).

(4)  2016 m. sausio 16 d. Tarybos sprendimas (BUSP) 2016/37 dėl Sprendimo (BUSP) 2015/1863, kuriuo iš dalies keičiamas Sprendimas 2010/413/BUSP dėl ribojamųjų priemonių Iranui, taikymo pradžios datos (OL L 11 I, 2016 1 16, p. 1).

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of HF Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, CurtisL. Hage, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Curtis L. Hage                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Curtis L. Hage, Chairman,  President |
|   | and Chief Executive Officer          |
|   |                                 |
|   | Date:                                |    February 12,  2009 |

 

 

----

*                                       Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to HF Financial Corp. and will be retained by HF Financial Corp. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Allen, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 544]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered April 23, 2002, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (s*ee People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]). Altman, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

VISKASE COMPANIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

WORLD PAC INTERNATIONAL AG, WORLD PAC
INTERNATIONAL USA, and SUN PRODUCTS

MARKETING UND MANUFACTURING AG, Defendants-Appellants.

____________________

2011-1256

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Case No. 09-CV-5022, Judge Elaine E. Bucklo.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

B RADFORD P. L YERLA , Jenner & Block LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him

on the brief were J EFFREY A. K OPPY , A LEXANDER
R OZENBLAT , and P ETER H. H ANNA . Of counsel on the brief

was E LAINE J. G OLDENBERG , of Washington, DC.G ARY A. R OSEN , Law Offices of Gary A. Rosen, P.C., ofArdmore, Pennsylvania, argued for defendantsappellants. Of counsel on the brief were J OHN D.

S IMMONS , S TEPHEN E. M URRAY , and D ENNIS J. B UTLER

, Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Of counsel was J AMES K.

B ORCIA , Tressler LLP, of Chicago, Illinois.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, R EYNA

, and W ALLACH

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 13, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03738

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

03738\03738_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03738\03738_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03738\03738_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03738\03738_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03738\03738_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03738\03738_PlantID_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03738\Certification Statement_ 03738.pdf Plant certification statement

03738\Supporting Documentation\03738_MAP-1.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03738\Supporting Documentation\WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10200

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Carlos Alberto Ayala, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:21-CR-47-1

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Defendant-Appellant Carlos 

Alberto Ayala has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ayala has filed a response, a request 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 23, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10200 Document: 00516482319 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/23/2022
No. 22-10200

2

for appointment of substitute counsel, and a motion for leave to file an 

additional response, which is incorporated in the motion for leave. His 

motion for leave to file an additional response is GRANTED. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Ayala’s responses. The record is not 

sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Ayala’s claims 

of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the 

claims, but without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 

739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We concur with counsel’s assessment that 

the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is therefore GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and Ayala’s appeal is DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Ayala’s motion for appointment of new counsel is 

DENIED as untimely. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902–03 (5th 

Cir. 1998).

Case: 22-10200 Document: 00516482319 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/23/2022
United States District Court

for the Southern District of Ohio

Western Division at Cincinnati

Tamera Brown, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

V.

City of Cincinnati, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:18-cv-00412

Senior District Judge Dlott

Magistrate Judge Litkovitz

Notice ofWithdrawal and Substitution of Counsel

for Defendant Sentinel Police Association

Pursuant to Local Rule 83.4, notice is hereby given that Alphonse A. Gerhardstein and

Janaya Trotter Bratton are withdrawn as counsel for Defendant Sentinel Police Association. Paul

M. Laufman and Gregory A. Napolitano hereby enter their appearances in substitution as trial

counsel for said party in this matter.

/s/Alphonse A. Gerhardstein

Alphonse A. Gerhardstein (0032053)

GERHARDSTEIN & BRANCH Co., LPA

441 Vine Street, Ste. 3400

Cincinnati, OH 45202

(513) 621-9100 (i')

(513) 345-5543 (f)

agerhardsteingbfirm.com.

Withdrawing Trial Counsel for Defendant

Sentinel Police Association

/s/Paul M Laufman

Paul M. Laufman (0066667)

LAUFMAN NAPOLITANO, LLC

4310 Hunt Road

Cincinnati, OH 45242

(513) 621-4556 @)

(513) 621-5563 (f)

plaufinan@LN-lawfirm.com

Substitute Trial Counsel for Defendant

Sentinel Police Association

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 41 Filed: 11/14/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 549
/s/Janaya Trotter Bratton

Janaya Trofter Bratton (0084123)

GERHARDSTEIN & BRANCH Co., LPA

441 Vine Street, Ste. 3400

Cincinnati, OH 45202

(513) 621-9100 (p)

(513) 345-5543 (f)

jbrattongbfirm.com

Withdrawing Trial Counsel for Defendant

Sentinel Police Association

/s/ Gregory A. Napolitano

Gregory A. Napolitano (0068671)

LAUFMAN NAPOLITANO, LLC

4310 Hunt Road

Cincinnati, OH 45242

(513) 621-4556 (p)

(513) 621-5563 (f)

gnapolitanoLN-lawfirm.com

Substitute Trial Counsel for Defendant

Sentinel Police Association

Louis Arnold, Sr., President, Sentinel Police

Association

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing pleading was electronically filed on the 141h

day ofNovember, 2019. Notice ofthis filing will be sent to all parties for whom counsel has

entered an appearance by operation ofthe Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access

this filing through the Court's electronic filing system.

Is! Paul M Laufman

Paul M. Laufman

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 41 Filed: 11/14/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 550
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         495,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      45,497,700
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,764,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,741,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     43,932,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,741,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,037,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,412,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,060,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,430,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (865,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (7.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.92)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CHARLES REED, III, 

 CASE NO. 2:18-CV-167 

 Petitioner, JUDGE JAMES L. GRAHAM 

 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson 

 v. 

WARDEN, CORRECTIONAL 

RECEPTION CENTER, 

 Respondent. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

 On December 31, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be denied 

and that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 19.) Although the parties were advised of the right 

to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the 

consequences of failing to do so, and the Court granted Petitioner three extensions of time for the 

filing of objections, no objections have been filed. 

 The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19)) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This 

action is hereby DISMISSED. 

Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 

474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the 

Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealabililty. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: June 17, 2019 

 _________s/James L. Graham___________ 

 JAMES L. GRAHAM 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



By:

/s/    JOHN P. BYRNESJohn P. Byrnes Chief Executive Officer




August 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Condensed 
Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1998 (unaudited) and the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 1998
(unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                               <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                             3,628
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                      2,067
<ALLOWANCES>                         452
<INVENTORY>                        3,063 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   9,498    
<PP&E>                             1,398
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    22,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,263
<BONDS>                                0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                              62
<OTHER-SE>                        21,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      22,556
<SALES>                            3,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   3,273  
<CGS>                              1,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      1,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   (39)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (518)
<INCOME-TAX>                        (881)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  363
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0 
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                         363 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (.06)
        

</TABLE>
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 02-4411



# 
S TEPHEN M ICHAEL P AGE ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville.

Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge.

(CR-00-15) Submitted: April 16, 2003 Decided: May 1, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL William L. Davis, III, Lumberton, North Carolina, for Appellant. D. Scott Broyles, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM:Stephen Michael Page pleaded guilty to membership in a conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (2000). Page was sentenced to 292 months incarcerationand 5 years of supervised release. Page timely appealed his conviction, and his attorney has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).On appeal, Page asserts that the magistrate judge erred in conducting his Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 plea colloquy, and consequently, that the district court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We review this claim for abuse of discretion. United States v. Ubakanma , 215 F.3d 421, 424 (4th Cir. 2000). Page’s claims are meritless. Page cannot establish his plea colloquy was flawed, or that the district court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; United States v. Lambey , 974 F.2d 1389, 1394 (4th Cir. 1992); United States v. DeFusco , 949 F.2d 114, 116-17 (4th Cir. 1991). United States v. Moore , 931 F.2d 245, 248 (4th Cir. 1991).Accordingly, we affirm Page’s conviction and sentence. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and find no other meritorious issues for appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the clientrequests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that acopy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presentedin the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. P AGE