alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The Honorable Barry S. Schermer, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3485

___________

In re: Robert P. Ciralsky, *

*

Debtor, *

---------------------------------- *

Robert P. Ciralsky, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

* for the Eighth Circuit.

John V. LaBarge, Jr., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 27, 2003 

 Filed: June 3, 2993 Corrected 6/30/03

___________

Before MORRIS S. ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert P. Ciralsky (Ciralsky) appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP)

order affirming the bankruptcy court’s1

 denials of Ciralsky’s motions for

reinstatement of his bankruptcy case and for reconsideration. Ciralsky challenges the
-2-

bankruptcy court’s refusal to reinstate his case, arguing he had not appeared at the

confirmation hearing, where the court granted Trustee John LaBarge’s motion to

dismiss his case, because he reasonably believed the hearing had been postponed. He

also argues that the bankruptcy court should have allowed a non-lawyer named Susan

Foerster (Foerster) to appear on his behalf when he was ill. 

We conclude the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in declining to

reinstate the case: although Ciralsky may have been confused about the hearing

schedule, he did not appear at the scheduled confirmation hearing and he was

admittedly behind on payments at the time the case was dismissed. See In re

Svoboda, 264 B.R. 190, 195 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review); 11 U.S.C.

§ 1307(c) (after notice and hearing, court may dismiss case for cause, including

failure to make plan payments); cf. Mullen v. Galati, 843 F.2d 293, 294 (8th Cir.

1988) (per curiam) (holding, where claims were dismissed for party’s failure to

appear at scheduled hearings, that dismissal with prejudice is severe sanction but may

be warranted for persistent failure to prosecute complaint). We also conclude

Ciralsky raised no arguments for reconsideration of the bankruptcy court’s denial of

reinstatement, see In re Svoboda, 264 B.R. at 195 (finding no abuse of discretion

where post-judgment motion simply rehashed factor that bankruptcy court had

already taken into account), and the court properly ruled that Foerster could not

appear on Ciralsky’s behalf, see Mo. Rev. Stat. § 484.010 (2000) (defining practice

of law); cf. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9010(a) (who may appear in case and perform acts not

constituting practice of law).

Accordingly, we affirm.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF WINDSOR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 8 AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE
RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         211,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,562,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 583,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,240,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,050,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,121,700
<COMMON>                                     1,922,900
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,105,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,240,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               509,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               149,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 514 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 514

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that Donald Stratton be remembered 
      for a lifetime of heroism and service to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2020

   Mr. Gardner (for himself and Mr. Bennet) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that Donald Stratton be remembered 
      for a lifetime of heroism and service to the United States.

Whereas, on February 15, 2020, Donald Stratton, a veteran of World War II and 
        one of the last remaining survivors of the attack on Pearl Harbor, 
        passed away peacefully surrounded by his loving family in Colorado 
        Springs, Colorado;
Whereas, on December 7, 1941, the attack on Pearl Harbor lasted for 
        approximately 5 hours, during which 2,403 members of the United States 
        Armed Forces were killed or mortally wounded, 1,247 members of the 
        United States Armed Forces were wounded, and 57 civilians lost their 
        lives;
Whereas, during the attack on Pearl Harbor, Seaman First Class Donald Stratton 
        was one of 6 sailors trapped in the control tower main mast after a 
        massive explosion on the U.S.S. Arizona; 
Whereas Boatswain's Mate Second Class Joseph Leon George saved the lives of 
        Seaman First Class Donald Stratton, Seaman First Class Harold Kuhn, 
        Seaman First Class Russell Lott, Gunner's Mate Third Class Earl Riner, 
        Boatswain's Mate Second Class Alvin Dvorak, and Fire Controlman Third 
        Class Lauren Bruner;
Whereas, despite suffering severe burns on more than 70 percent of his body and 
        being medically discharged, Donald Stratton later reenlisted in the 
        United States Navy to continue serving during World War II;
Whereas, after serving in the United States Armed Forces, Donald Stratton 
        committed his life to pursuing the posthumous recognition of Joseph 
        George with the award of a Bronze Star; and
Whereas Donald Stratton exemplified the heroism and selfless service of the 
        members of the United States Armed Forces: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors Donald Stratton for his lifelong commitment to 
        service to the United States and the example he set for future 
        generations; and
            (2) remembers the men and women of the Greatest Generation 
        of the United States, including the few remaining survivors of 
        that generation.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $60,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    $50,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              $110,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                $110,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          $25,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       $85,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  $110,000
<SALES>                                       $197,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $197,000
<CGS>                                          $44,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  $44,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $120,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              $(32,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          $(32,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 $(32,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $(0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.00)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin Molina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1.

this report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the 1934 Act, and



2.

the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



By: /s/ Edwin Molina

-----------------------------------

Name: Edwin Molina

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:May 11th, 2007
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHASE MILLER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 969

[ December 9, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Cheryl Caracuzzo

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015CF005160

.

Rachael E. Reese of O’ B rien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Tampa, for

appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,018,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,117,621
<PP&E>                                         903,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                 413,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,634,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,177,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       187,772
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,005,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,634,891
<SALES>                                         38,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,400
<CGS>                                            7,125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,303,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               316,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,587,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,588,740
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,588,740
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
Case: 3:18-cr-00012-SLO Doc #: 4 Filed: 03/14/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 4
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


 Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: MRSEC--UCSD 2nd Year Virtual Site Visit 
(1203).

DATE AND TIME: April 27, 2022; 9:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

PLACE:  NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 [verbar] 
Virtual.

TYPE OF MEETING: Part-Open.

CONTACT PERSON: Dr. Miriam Deutsch, Program Director, Division of 
Materials Research, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Room W 9216, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: (703) 292-5360.

PURPOSE OF MEETING: Virtual site visit to provide an evaluation of the 
progress of the projects at the host site for the Division of Materials 
Research at the National Science Foundation.

AGENDA: 

                              May 27, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m.........  Brief Charge to       CLOSED.
                               Panel.
10:00 a.m.-10:10 a.m........  Introduction........  OPEN.
10:10 a.m.-10:55 a.m........  Director's Overview.  OPEN.
10:55 a.m.-11:10 a.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
11:10 a.m.-11:30 a.m........  IRG-1 Presentation..  OPEN.
11:30 a.m.-11:35 a.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
11:35 a.m.-11:45 a.m........  Break...............  OPEN.
11:45 a.m.-12:05 p.m........  IRG-2 Presentation..  OPEN.
12:05 p.m.-12:10 p.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN
12:10 p.m.-12:35 p.m........  Education and         OPEN.
                               Outreach, Diversity
                               Plan.
12:35 p.m.-12:45 p.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
12:45 p.m.-01:30 p.m........  Working Lunch.......  CLOSED.
01:30 p.m.-02:30 p.m........  Poster Session......  OPEN.
02:30 p.m.-02:45 p.m........  Site Visit            OPEN.
                               Discussion.
02:45 p.m.-03:30 p.m........  Executive Session...  CLOSED.
03:30 p.m.-04:00 p.m........  Debriefing..........  OPEN.
04:00 p.m...................  Adjourn.............
------------------------------------------------------------------------


REASON FOR CLOSING: The work being reviewed during closed portions of 
the virtual site visit include information of a proprietary or 
confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, 
such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the project. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 14, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-01100 Filed 1-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

 

SCOTT D. DALESANDRO and DIANE : Case No. C-1-01 109 

NOONAN, on behalf of themselves and : 

others, : Chief Judge Sandra S. Beckwith 

 : 

 Plaintiffs, : 

 : 

 vs. : 

 : 

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

 

DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S REPORT ON THE RESULTS OF THE NOTICE TO THE CLASS 

FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO OPPOSE SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES 

 

 On August 20, 2004, plaintiff’s counsel filed a Report on the Results of the Notice to the 

Class for Entry of Final Judgment along with a Supplemental Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and 

Expenses. 

Because plaintiff’s “Report” is not a motion or other pleading to which a response is 

contemplated by the Local Rules, the defendant submits this notice to the Court that defendant 

does intend to file a response, and proposes a deadline of September 16, 2004, in which to do so. 

Defendant needs to obtain additional documentation in support of its response, and due to the 

intervening Labor Day holiday and absence of many necessary personnel during this time, 

defendant respectfully requests time beyond the standard 21-day response time for a motion. 

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 71 Filed 09/03/2004 Page 1 of 2
The defendant also hereby moves for an unopposed 6-day extension -- to September 16, 

2004 -- to file a response to plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion For Attorneys fees (International Paper’ 

response would otherwise be due on or before September 10, 2004). 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO. 

 

 

By: s / Michael Roberts__________ 

 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO. 

 

 Michael A. Roberts (OH Bar No. 0047129) 

 Graydon Head & Ritchey, LLP 

 1900 5th 3rd Center 

511 Walnut Street 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

(513) 629-2799 

(513) 651-3836 

email:mroberts@graydon.com 

 

W. Carter Younger (VSB 01147) 

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

James P. McElligott, Jr. (VSB 014109) 

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

McGuireWoods LLP 

One James Center 

Richmond, VA 23219 

(804) 775-4363 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 

 I hereby certify that on this 3rd day of September 2004, a true and complete copy of this 

document was delivered via electronic filing to Counsel for Plaintiff, Theresa L. Groh, Esq., and 

John C. Murdock at Murdock, Goldenberg, Schneider & Groh, L.P.A., 700 Walnut Street, Suite 400, 

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202. 

 s/ Michael A. Roberts 

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 71 Filed 09/03/2004 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:18-cr-75 (2)

Judge Marbley

Nicholas D. Glassburn 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 98) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Counts 1 and 8 of the Indictment, and

he is hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The Court will defer

the decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: August 22, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tate~ Qtourt of ~peaI~

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

DONNA R. CAMP,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

2013-3008

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in case no. SF0752120714-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Donna R. Camp moves for leave to proceed in forma

pauperIs.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

Case: 13-3008 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 11/28/2012
DONNA CAMP v. DVA

824

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

2

Case: 13-3008 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 11/28/2012
CERTIFICATION
                           OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan Lew, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB of ABSS, CORP;

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended yearly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended
yearly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amended yearly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended yearly
report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the a registrant is made known to me by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended
yearly report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure control and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended
yearly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c) presented in this amended yearly report my conclusions about
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this amended yearly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Dated: April 14, 2004

/s/ Alan Lew
---------------------
    Alan Lew
    Chief Executive Officer,
    Chief Financial Officer