alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Case number: 01

- 11

- 01125

- CR

Style: Elisa Merrill Wilson v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed : January 15, 2015

Party filing motion: Appellant

Appellant’s motion for leave to file supplemental brief on remand is granted

. The State’s response, if any, is due by February 10 , 2015

.

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland

A cting individually

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Date: January 22 , 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 194,352
<CASH>                                          34,903
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              23,975
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,743
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 94,669
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             22,936
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 35,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   288,743
<PREMIUMS>                                     124,124
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             10,147
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,126
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  26,722
<BENEFITS>                                      88,173
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     37,179
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            14,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,142
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.51
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  62,420
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             83,485
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                4,688
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              43,287
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                34,902
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 72,404
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          4,688
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 91 Filed 02/09/2005 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 1 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 2 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 3 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 4 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 5 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 6 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 7 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 8 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 9 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 10 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 11 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 12 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 13 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 14 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 15 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 16 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 17 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 18 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 19 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 20 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 21 of 22

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 98-2      Filed 07/28/2005     Page 22 of 22
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4628 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4628

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, as the ``Sergeant 
              Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER R. HRBEK POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 126      Filed 12/18/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 126      Filed 12/18/2007     Page 2 of 2
#### Lyle v Department of Corrections,

No. 91039;

Court of Appeals No. 133461.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 29,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerOctober 31, 2006




24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,795
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               9
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    160,495
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         246,597
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           250,556
<LOANS>                                        556,607
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,026,526
<DEPOSITS>                                     660,761
<SHORT-TERM>                                    62,485
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             14,051
<LONG-TERM>                                    186,360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,569
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,026,526
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,069
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,038
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   355
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,462
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,551
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,547
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,915
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 480
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,174
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,174
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.85
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,792
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,797
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      104
<RECOVERIES>                                        40
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,833
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,833
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Carlos Hopkins, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 1:18cv297 

Warden, Belmont 

Correctional Institution, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Respondent. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on February 4, 2019 (Doc. 10). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including 

notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report 

and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 

1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10) of the 

Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the 

Magistrate Judge, Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) is GRANTED and the Petition 

(Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

Any request for certificate of appealability or request to certify an appeal would not be 

taken in good faith and would be denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge 

United States District Court
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-4      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-4      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-4      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
I. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1).     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2).     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  February 13, 2003                     By:  /s/ Douglas I. Payne
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Douglas I. Payne
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3564-3565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Advancing Translational 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA Collaborative Innovation 
Awards Review Meeting.
    Date: February 23, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, 
National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 1037, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: M. Lourdes Ponce, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing 
Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Room 1037, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0810, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#deb2b1abacbabbadf0aeb1b0bdbb9eb0b7b6f0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="016d6e74736564722f716e6f6264416f68692f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, 
Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, 
B--Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 3565]]


    Dated: January 18, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-01233 Filed 1-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of 
New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-67511, 333-64203, 
and 333-24615) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-023329, 333-13481, 333-65223, 
333-65193 and 333-65221) of our report dated March 2, 1999, on our audits of 
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of New 
Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. as of December 31, 1998, July 31, 1998, and 
July 31, 1997 and for the five months ended December 31, 1998 and for each of 
the three years in the period ended July 31, 1998 which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.


                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                  

San Diego, California
April 6, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          152
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 13064
<ALLOWANCES>                                    384
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              12974
<PP&E>                                         8528
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                18376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10753
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         38
<OTHER-SE>                                     7585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18376
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              68153
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 55548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              10352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                778
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1127
<INCOME-TAX>                                    407
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             720
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    720
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .20


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-1429

___________________________

Thomas Alfred Brydon

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

v.

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

____________

 Submitted: November 13, 2012

Filed: December 3, 2012

[Unpublished] 

____________

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Thomas Alfred Brydon appeals the district court's1

 denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 petition for relief. We affirm.

1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa.
Brydon pleaded guilty to conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine. At

sentencing, the district court applied the career-offender provisions of United States

Sentencing Guidelines §§ 4B1.1 & 4B1.2. The court determined that four prior Iowa

convictions for operating a motor vehicle without the owner's consent and one prior

Iowa conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated qualified as predicate

crimes of violence. Subsequently, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Begay v.

United States, 553 U.S. 137 (2008) (holding that driving while intoxicated is not a

"violent felony" pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)). Later, in United States v.

Steward, 598 F.3d 960, 963 (8th Cir. 2010), we applied Begay and held that the Iowa

offense of operating a motor vehicle without the owner's consent is no longer to be

deemed a predicate "crime of violence" as defined in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 & 4B1.2.

Brydon filed his § 2255 petition asserting that a failure to resentence him and

extend to him the benefit of Begay would amount to a miscarriage of justice. The

district court acknowledged the change in the law as expressed in Begay, but held that,

because Brydon's sentence was below the statutory maximum penalty for his offense,

he alleged only a Guidelines error such that § 2255 relief remained unavailable. 

Pursuant to our en banc ruling in Sun Bear v. United States, 644 F.3d 700 (8th

Cir. 2011) (en banc), we affirm the judgment of the district court. In Sun Bear, our

Court held that § 2255 provides no avenue of relief for a federal prisoner sentenced

below the applicable statutory maximum sentence even if that prisoner is sentenced

as a career offender based upon a predicate offense later determined not to be a crime

of violence in light of Begay. Id. at 704–06. Our court characterized such an error as

an "ordinary" Sentencing Guidelines question rather than a cognizable error of law or

an error that fits within any miscarriage-of-justice exception for § 2255 relief. Id. at

704. Brydon's argument is materially indistinguishable from the argument rejected

in Sun Bear.

-2-
We affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

-3-