alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 7 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 7

         To make effective appointment of Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2019

  Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         To make effective appointment of Senate Legal Counsel.

    Resolved, That the appointment of Patricia Mack Bryan of Virginia 
to be Senate Legal Counsel, made by the President pro tempore this day, 
is effective as of January 3, 2019, and the term of service of the 
appointee shall expire at the end of the One Hundred Seventeenth 
Congress.
                                 <all>
```
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

6/8/2020

 Southern District of Ohio

Tenola Oliver

3:18-CV-127

Relx Inc. d/b/a LexisNexis

✔ Judgment in favor of Plaintff and against Defendant; Case is dismissed with prejudice.

Thomas M. Rose

Approval of Settlement and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice

Case: 3:18-cv-00127-TMR Doc #: 40 Filed: 06/08/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 312
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4286 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 

a local educational agency that receives a subgrant under section 2121 

of such Act to use the funds to provide professional development activities 

that train school personnel about restorative justice and conflict resolution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2009 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, and Mr. PAYNE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to allow a local educational agency that receives 

a subgrant under section 2121 of such Act to use the 

funds to provide professional development activities that 

train school personnel about restorative justice and conflict resolution. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restorative Justice in 

5 Schools Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4286 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORATIVE JUSTICE TRAINING. 

2 Section 2123(a)(3)(B) of the Elementary and Sec3 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6623(a)(3)(B)) 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

6 (2) in clause (v), by striking the period at the 

7 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

8 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(vi) provide training about restora10 tive justice and conflict resolution.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael A. Bohm, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2006



/s/ Michael A. BohmMichael A. BohmExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

BRIAN GARRETT, et al., 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 Civil Action 2:18-cv-692 

 v. Judge Michael H. Watson 

 Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

 

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, 

 

 Defendant. 

 

 

ORDER

For good cause shown, Plaintiffs’ Motion for John Doe Plaintiffs to Proceed 

Anonymously (ECF No. 49) is GRANTED1 IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows. To 

the extent that Plaintiffs wish to proceed anonymously on the docket, the Motion is GRANTED. 

The parties are DIRECTED to use “John Doe 1–35” in all pleadings and documents to be filed 

on the public record when referring to the thirty-one Plaintiffs who wish to proceed anonymously 

in this action.2

 

Plaintiffs also ask the Court for an order “requiring Plaintiffs’ true names not be disclosed 

to the Defendant, its attorneys, and those working for it, and to witnesses, unless Defendant 

establishes a need to know[.]” (ECF No. 49 at 3 (emphasis added).) The Court is not persuaded 

that the present record warrants such an order. Moreover, the Court has already issued an Order 

in the related case, ECF No. 33, filed in Case No. 2:18-cv-736, that provides disclosure to 

 

1 Defendant does not currently oppose Plaintiffs’ current request for anonymity but reserves its 

right to revisit the request depending on subsequent case developments. (Id. at 1–2.) 

2

 Plaintiffs represent that four of the thirty-nine Plaintiffs have agreed to proceed in this action 

using their own names (id. at 2) and, indeed, already appear in the First Amended Complaint 

(ECF No. 33). 

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 51 Filed: 01/17/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 296
2 

Defendant, its attorneys, and legal support staff for Defendant. Accordingly, in keeping with that 

prior Order, to the extent counsel for Plaintiffs have not already done so, they shall disclose these 

thirty-five Plaintiffs’ true identities to Defendant’s attorneys. Defense counsel may disclose the 

Doe Plaintiffs’ identities to Defendant and to other legal support staff for Defendant. The Doe 

Plaintiffs’ identities also may be disclosed to witnesses only on a “need to know” basis in the 

course of this litigation. To that end, the parties are DIRECTED to discuss and resolve any 

question as to which witnesses “need to know” the true identities, but the parties may contact the 

Court in the event they have reached impasse on this issue. 

Plaintiffs must file with the Court ex parte and under seal a First Amended Complaint 

bearing the thirty-five Doe Plaintiffs’ true names WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date 

of this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 

Date: January 17, 2019 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 51 Filed: 01/17/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 297
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       9,812,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,882,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (726,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     386,925,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,909,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             428,307,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,072,000
<BONDS>                                    210,797,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   208,678,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               428,307,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            55,229,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,470,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,933,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               409,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,458,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,192,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         18,192,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                18,192,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>




FRONTIER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.        1999 FORM 10-K                 EXHIBIT 12


                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                         Year Ended December 31
                                                      --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        1999         1998        1997        1996          1995
                                                      ----------  -----------  ----------- ----------   -----------
<S>                                                               <C>           <C>         <C>          <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes
   and cumulative effect of change
      in accounting principle                        $(174,085)   $(90,875)     $45,849     $56,659      $43,280

Add:
      Minority interest and interest expense            18,479      11,931       11,842       4,247          895
      Interest portion of rental expense                   500         500          500         371          240
                                                     ---------    --------      -------     -------      -------
Earnings available for payment of combined
      fixed charges and preferred stock dividends    $(155,106)   $(78,444)     $58,191     $61,277      $44,415
                                                     ==========   =========     =======     =======      =======
Combined fixed charges:
      Minority Interest and interest expense         $  18,479     $11,931      $11,842      $4,247      $   895
      Interest portion of rental expense                   500         500          500         371          240
                                                     ---------     -------      -------      ------        -----
Total combined fixed charges                         $  18,979     $12,431      $12,342      $4,618      $ 1,135
                                                     =========     =======      =======      ======        =====
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges (1)           (8.2)       (6.3)         4.7        13.3         39.1
</TABLE>

For purposes of determining this ratio, earnings consist of income before
federal income taxes, plus fixed charges. Fixed Charges consist of 1) minority
interest-preferred securities of subsidiary trust, and interest expense on
short-term debt, 2) amortization of debt issuance costs and 3) the portion of
rental expense that is representative of the interest factor.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          74,520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  342,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               589,896
<PP&E>                                         383,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                 150,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,821,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          378,637
<BONDS>                                        602,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       851,589
<OTHER-SE>                                     (42,536)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,821,920
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               810,032
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  774,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,791
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,711
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
*

Honorable James L. Oakes, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the

Second Circuit, sitting by designation. 

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

No. 94-4889.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Luz Marleney CALDERON, a/k/a "Eileen", Defendant-Appellee.

June 21, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Florida. (No. 91-522- CR-UUB), Ursula Ungaro-Benages,

Judge.

Before HATCHETT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and OAKES*, Senior

Circuit Judge.

BARKETT, Circuit Judge:

Appellant the United States of America appeals the district

court's order granting Appellee Luz Marleney Calderon's motion for

a judgment of acquittal. The government argues that the district

court did not have jurisdiction to grant Calderon's motion for a

judgment of acquittal because it was filed several months after the

seven-day filing deadline imposed by Rule 29(c) of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The United States Supreme Court has just ruled adversely to

Calderon's position, holding that district courts do not have

jurisdiction to consider an untimely motion for a judgment of

acquittal. Carlisle v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct.

1460, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (1996). Accordingly, we reverse the

district court's order granting Calderon's motion for a judgment of

acquittal, and remand for the entry of a judgment of conviction and
 1

Calderon alternatively argues in her brief that the

evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support her

conviction. This is an argument that is appropriately made on

appeal after judgment and sentence are entered on the criminal

docket. 

sentence.1

REVERSED and REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                     5




<MULTIPLIER>                                          1000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                              9,162
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     304,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  384,341
<PP&E>                                            691,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,265,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             397,784
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        580,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,265,681
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  608,221
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     567,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (685)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  4,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    36,873
<INCOME-TAX>                                       14,823
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                22,316
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       22,316
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.81






</TABLE>
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 698 

Designating September 2020 as ‘‘National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2020 as ‘‘National Spinal Cord 

Injury Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas approximately 294,000 individuals in the United 

States live with spinal cord injuries, which cost society 

billions of dollars in health care costs and lost wages; 

Whereas there are approximately 17,810 new spinal cord injuries in the United States each year; 

Whereas more than 42,000 individuals with spinal cord injuries are veterans; 

Whereas motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries; 

Whereas nearly half of all spinal cord injuries to individuals 

30 years of age or younger occur as a result of motor vehicle accidents; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 698 ATS 

Whereas the average remaining years of life for individuals 

living with spinal cord injuries has not improved significantly since the 1980s; 

Whereas there is an urgent need to develop new 

neuroprotection, pharmacological, and regeneration treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; and 

Whereas increased education and investment in research are 

key factors in improving outcomes for individuals living 

with spinal cord injuries, enhancing the quality of life of 

individuals with spinal cord injuries, and ultimately curing paralysis: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2020 as ‘‘National 

3 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

5 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month; 

6 (3) continues to support research to find better 

7 treatments, therapies, and a cure for spinal cord in8 juries; 

9 (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies 

10 that offer promise and hope to individuals living 

11 with paralysis; and 

12 (5) commends the dedication of national, re13 gional, and local organizations, researchers, doctors, 

14 volunteers, and people across the United States who 

15 are working to improve the quality of life of individVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:58 Sep 17, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR698.ATS SR698

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 698 ATS 

1 uals living with spinal cord injuries and their fami2 lies. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 16, 2018

No. 04-18-00029-CV

AUTOBUSES ZAVALA PLUS,

Appellant

v.

Maria Torres MARTINEZ,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CI02517

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s second agreed motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to August 13, 2018.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court