alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 735 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 735

  Designating September 29, 2020, as ``National Urban Wildlife Refuge 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2020

  Mr. Gardner (for himself, Mr. Bennet, and Mr. Udall) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating September 29, 2020, as ``National Urban Wildlife Refuge 
                                 Day''.

Whereas over 80 percent of people in the United States live in or near cities, 
        which typically have limited opportunities for residents to access 
        nature and experience outdoor recreation;
Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System under the United States Fish and 
        Wildlife Service manages 568 national wildlife refuges that constitute a 
        national network of land and water managed for the conservation of fish, 
        wildlife, and plants in the United States;
Whereas national wildlife refuges provide opportunities for people to discover 
        and appreciate nature;
Whereas there is a refuge located within a 1-hour drive of every metropolitan 
        area in the United States;
Whereas the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program under the United States Fish and 
        Wildlife Service--

    (1) focuses on introducing people living in densely populated areas to 
the more than 100 national wildlife refuges near urban areas; and

    (2) promotes wildlife conservation and the enjoyment of hunting, 
fishing, and other wildlife-dependent recreational activities close to 
where people live;

Whereas the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program focuses on public-private 
        partnerships--

    (1) to improve wildlife conservation; and

    (2) to promote access to recreation on and off national wildlife 
refuges, including recreational activities such as hunting and fishing; and

Whereas by exploring community-centered approaches to address local needs, 
        engaging the next generation of anglers and hunters, and providing 
        infrastructure and safe access, the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program 
        helps local organizations, cities, and towns across the United States 
        engage in conservation activities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 29, 2020, as ``National Urban 
        Wildlife Refuge Day'';
            (2) encourages the United States Fish and Wildlife Service 
        to increase access to outdoor recreational opportunities for 
        urban communities; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to visit and 
        experience the more than 100 urban national wildlife refuges of 
        the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between WP Glimcher Inc., an Indiana corporation (the “Company”), and Robert P. Demchak (“Executive”), executed on October 12, 2015, effective as of October 12, 2015.
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to an employment agreement, dated as of June 3, 2014 and amended as of August 1, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”) (capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Employment Agreement); and
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect Executive’s continued employment on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Terms of Employment.    Section 2.2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows
“2.2     During the Employment Period, Executive shall serve the Company as its Executive Vice President, Assistant General Counsel, and Assistant Secretary and shall perform customary and appropriate duties as may be reasonably assigned to the Executive from time to time by the Company and shall provide services to Washington Prime Group. L.P. The Executive shall report to the Company’s Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.”


2. Governing Law.  The second sentence of Section 4.4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“Venue for a dispute in respect of this Agreement shall be the federal courts located in Columbus, Ohio.”
3. Acknowledgement.  Executive hereby acknowledges and agrees that nothing in this Amendment shall constitute “Good Reason” under the Employment Agreement. 
4. Entire Agreement.  Except as otherwise provided herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain unaltered and of full force and effect.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]



    








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the day and year first above set forth.


	
								
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Robert P. Demchak

	 

	/s/ Robert P. Demchak

	 

	



WP Glimcher Inc.

	 
	 

	

By:
	 
	/s/ Mark E. Yale

	 
	 
	Name:
	 
	Mark E. Yale

	 
	 
	Title:
	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer







[Signature Page – R. Demchak Second Amendment to Employment Agreement]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schudule contains summary financial information extracted from From 10-KSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         233,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  712,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (355,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    140,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               754,396
<PP&E>                                       4,116,006
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,759,425)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,419,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,580,745
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     17,130
<COMMON>                                        84,763
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,724,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,419,214
<SALES>                                      6,825,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,825,875
<CGS>                                        4,205,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,169,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             337,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,343,449)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,343,449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,343,449)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Jamual S. Burks, :

:

Plaintiff(s), :

: Case Number: 1:18cv282

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

Christie Weaver, :

:

Defendant(s). :

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 11, 2018 (Doc. 5), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such

objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 25, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report and

Recommendation.

Accordingly, the complaint (Doc. 1-1) is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§§1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), with the exception of plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim

against defendant Weaver.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting this

Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff is therefore DENIED leave to

appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__s/Susan J. Dlott__

Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

MELISSA MCFADDEN, 

Case No. 2:18-cv-544

Plaintiff, Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

v. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

CITY OF COLUMBUS, DEFENDANT CITY OF COLUMBUS’

NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION Defendant.

NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION

Defendants hereby give notice that they are filing the following deposition with the Court, 

together with the designated exhibits:

1. Deposition of Melissa McFadden, taken December 3, 2020, with 29 exhibits. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Westley M. Phillips

Susan E. Williams (0073375)—LEAD

Westley M. Phillips (0077728)

Assistant City Attorneys

CITY OF COLUMBUS, DEPARTMENT OF LAW

ZACH KLEIN, CITY ATTORNEY

77 North Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215

(614) 645-7385 / (614) 645-6949 (fax)

sewilliams@columbus.gov

wmphillips@columbus.gov

Attorneys for Defendant City of Columbus

Counsel for Defendants

Case: 2:18-cv-00544-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 33 Filed: 01/27/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 109
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on January 27, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court by using this Court’s e-Filing System, which will send a notice of this electronic filing 

to all counsel of record in this matter:

/s/ Westley M. Phillips

Westley M. Phillips (0077728)

Case: 2:18-cv-00544-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 33 Filed: 01/27/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 110
ex101.htm












Addendum No. 1







Dated October 15, 2015 to that certain services agreement originally dated as of the 7th day of November 2014 by and between WD SPENCE PROSTHETICS LIMITED, former company name of HCi Viocare Clinics UK Limited, with offices at Kintyre House, 209 Govan Road, Glasgow, Scotland, UK G51 1HJ (the “Company”), and Heleen Françoise Kist, resident of 48 Glencairn Drive, Glasgow, G41 4PR, Scotland, UK (the “Executive”), hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”.







In accordance with Term 2. – Term of Appointment Subsection 2.1 and Term 3. –Duration of employment of the Agreement, the Company hereby extends the term of this Agreement for a period of one (1) year starting from October 1st 2015 and ending September 30th 2016.







In accordance with Term 11. – Remuneration Subsection 11.1 to the Agreement, the Company hereby increases the remuneration of the Executive to £45,000 (gross) per annum.







This Addendum No. 1 shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective assigns, successors and personal representative(s).


 


The terms and conditions and provisions as contained in the Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


This Addendum No. 1 shall be appended to and form a part of the Agreement.


 



	
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Addendum No. 1 to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first written above.


















	
 


The Company 


 


 


 


 


 


Sotirios Leontaritis


President


 


 

	
 


The Executive


 


 


 


 


 


Heleen Françoise Kist
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                      30
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 110,250
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 110,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 632,800
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   8,727
<OTHER-SE>                                           0               (531,247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 110,280
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               161,739                 480,277
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (161,739)               (480,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (161,739)               (480,277)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,739)               (480,277)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 1 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 2 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 3 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 4 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 5 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 6 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 7 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 8 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 9 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 10 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 11 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 12 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 13 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 14 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 15 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 16 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 17 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 18 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 19 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 20 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 21 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 22 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 23 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 24 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 25 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 26 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 27 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 28 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 29 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 30 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 31 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 32 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 33 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 34 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 35 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 36 of 37

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH     Document 100      Filed 12/10/2003     Page 37 of 37
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:18-cr-149

Tomas Sanchez-Esqueda 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 21) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: August 27, 2018 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge
Exhibit H-2

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-23 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 3218
Date Description of Services Time

7/17/2018 review, edit draft of response to M to dismiss 3.5

4/10/2019

Call with Gabriel about status of case and next steps - discovery - 

push to get the complete production 0.5

11/5/2019

call with Gabriel and Malita about upcoming issues - briefing 

schedule, expert 0.7

1/2/2020

call with Gabriel and Malita about MSJ brief and dep transcript 

redactions 0.4

1/21/2020 review state's M for SJ, team call re same 1.4

1/30/2020

conf with Gabriel and Malita re open issues, briefing plans for MSJ 

response 0.3

2/7/2020 review edit and comment on response brief draft 3.7

2/11/2020 review, edit, and comment re current draft of brief 0.9

2/25/2020 review, edits and comments on draft reply brief 0.6

Total Time 12.0

Hourly Rate x $ 500.00 

Lodestar Fees 6000

John Knight

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-23 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 3219
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Abaxis, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:    August 10, 2009
    /s/ Clinton H. SeversonClinton H. SeversonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**I, Montgomery L. Bannerman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 ofVerso Technologies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:April 30, 2007      /s/  Montgomery L. Bannerman