alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

DAVID THOMAS TERWILLEGER, Case No. 1:18-cv-11

Plaintiff, Barrett, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.

vs.
COMMISSIONER OF ORDER
SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of the Court’s
denial of his request for costs in this case. (Doc. 29). Plaintiff's motion is granted in part and
denied in part.

“The costs that courts may tax under Rule 54(d)(1) are confined to the costs itemized in
28 U.S.C. § 1920.” In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litig., 481 F.3d 355, 359 (6th Cir. 2007).
Under section 1920, a court may tax as costs the following: (1) fees of the clerk and marshal; (2)
fees for printed or electronically recorded transcripts necessarily obtained for use in the case; (3)
fees and disbursements for printing and witnesses; (4) fees for exemplification and the costs of
making copies of any materials where the copies are necessarily obtained for use in the case; (5)
docket fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1923; and (6) compensation for court appointed experts and
interpreters, as well as costs for certain interpretative services. 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

Plaintiff has submitted an Amended Bill of Costs in the amount of $435.20. (Doc. 29-1).
This includes costs for the filing fee, service fees, and parking fees. Parking fees are not
recoverable under § 1920. See Lensing v. Potter, No. 1:03-cv-575, 2015 WL 10892073, at *18

(W.D. Mich. Aug. 20, 2015) (and cases cited therein). Therefore, the Court denies plaintiff's


requests for parking fees. The Court grants plaintiff's request for other costs in the amount of

$419.95.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

pa: 8/27/19 Filey athe
Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17312 and #17313; ALASKA Disaster Number AK-00048]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Alaska (FEMA-4638-DR), dated 01/15/2022. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         10/29/2021 through 11/01/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 01/15/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/16/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/17/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 01/15/2022, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Areas:*
                     Kenai Peninsula Borough. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17312 9 and for economic injury is 17313 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Barbara E. Carson, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2022-01341 Filed 1-24-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
# Journal officiel C 28A/26 j

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 28A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 59e année26 janvier 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 28A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

59e année26 janvier 2016

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 028A/01 | Liste de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AD/289/14 — Juristes-linguistes (AD7) de langue française (FR) | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

2016/C 028A/01

Liste de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AD/289/14 — Juristes-linguistes (AD7) de langue française (FR)

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

| 26.1.2016 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 28/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2016

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 28/1

---

LISTE DE RÉSERVE (1)

CONCOURS GÉNÉRAL EPSO/AD/289/14

JURISTES-LINGUISTES (AD7) DE LANGUE FRANÇAISE (FR)

(2016/C 028 A/01)

| ALIBERT | Caroline |
| --- | --- |
| BABINET | François-Régis |
| BENTLEY | Jeremy Patrick Marie |
| CHANTRE | Stéphanie |
| JAUME | Marie-Alice |
| LEFEBVRE | Bérenger |
| LILAMAND | Thomas |
| LIVOLSI | Thomas |
| MARNIER | Claire-Agnès |
| RASS | Lukas |
| VOLPI | Bettina |
| WARIN | Catherine |

ALIBERT

Caroline

BABINET

François-Régis

BENTLEY

Jeremy Patrick Marie

CHANTRE

Stéphanie

JAUME

Marie-Alice

LEFEBVRE

Bérenger

LILAMAND

Thomas

LIVOLSI

Thomas

MARNIER

Claire-Agnès

RASS

Lukas

VOLPI

Bettina

WARIN

Catherine

La validité de cette liste expirera le 31 décembre 2018.

---

(1)  À la demande expresse d’un lauréat, son nom n’est pas publié.

---
Número Identificador

SEN 20 2 4

_________

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO

TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES

PANEL ESPECIAL (VI)

PEARSON PEM PR, INC.

Recurrente

V.

DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCACIÓN DE PR

Recurrido KLRA202400016 Revisión

Administrativa procedente del Departamento de

Educación de

Número Adjudicación:

RFP DEP R

- UAF

- 22

- 010

Sobre:

Errores en la Adjudicación de RFP

Panel integrado por su president a , la Jueza Ort iz Flores

, el Juez

Rivera Torres y la Jueza Rivera Pérez

Rivera Pérez, Juez a Ponente

SENTENCIA

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 7 de marzo de 2024

.

Examinado el Aviso de Desistimiento de Solicitud de Revisión

Judicial, presentado por Pearson PEM PR, Inc. el 5 de marzo de

2024, el Tribunal dispone:

Ha Lugar. En consecuencia, se ordena el cierre y archivo del

recurso del presente caso de conformidad con la Regla 83 (A) del

Reglamento del Tribunal de Apelaciones 1

.

Lo acordó y manda el Tribunal, y certifica la Secretaria del

Tribunal de Apelaciones.

Lcda. Lilia M. Oquendo Sol í s Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones

1 4 LPRA Ap. XXII

- B, R. 83(A).
EXHIBIT 32(B)




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Yacov Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



  /S/ YACOV KAUFMAN
Yacov Kaufman
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004
Case 1:00-cr-00093-SAS Document 53 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 764 

Designating October 26, 2020, as the ‘‘Day of the Deployed’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, OCTOBER 19), 2020 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself, Ms. WARREN, Mr. DAINES, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. 

TESTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 26, 2020, as the ‘‘Day of the 

Deployed’’. 

Whereas more than 2,100,000 individuals serve as members 

of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

Whereas several hundred thousand members of the Armed 

Forces rotate each year through deployments to more 

than 150 countries in every region of the world; 

Whereas more than 2,000,000 members of the Armed Forces 

have deployed to the area of operations of the United 

States Central Command since the September 11, 2001, 

terrorist attacks; 

Whereas the United States is kept strong and free by the 

loyal military personnel from the total force, which is 

comprised of the regular components, the National 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 764 IS 

Guard, and the Reserves, who protect the precious heritage of the United States through their declarations and 

actions; 

Whereas the United States remains committed to providing 

the fullest possible accounting for personnel missing from 

past conflicts ranging from World War II through current day conflicts; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces serving at home and 

abroad have courageously answered the call to duty to 

defend the ideals of the United States and to preserve 

peace and freedom around the world; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces continue to serve and 

protect the people of the United States by making deployments in the midst of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 

(COVID–19) pandemic; 

Whereas the United States remains committed to easing the 

transition from deployment abroad to service at home for 

members of the Armed Forces and the families of the 

members; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces personify the virtues 

of patriotism, service, duty, courage, and sacrifice; 

Whereas the families of members of the Armed Forces make 

important and significant sacrifices for the United 

States; and 

Whereas the Senate has designated October 26 as the ‘‘Day 

of the Deployed’’ since 2011: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 26, 2020, as the ‘‘Day 

3 of the Deployed’’; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 764 IS 

1 (2) honors the deployed members of the Armed 

2 Forces of the United States and the families of the 

3 members; 

4 (3) calls on the people of the United States to 

5 reflect on the service of those members of the Armed 

6 Forces, wherever the members serve, past, present, 

7 and future; and 

8 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe the Day of the Deployed with appropriate 

10 ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              56
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (82)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,956
<PP&E>                                           2,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (762)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,813
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,432)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,564
<SALES>                                          3,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,168
<CGS>                                            1,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     81
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 81
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        81
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: M.I., A MINOR

PETITION OF: ROBERT S. HORWITZ,
ESQUIRE :

:

:

:

: No. 73 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6 th day of November , 2023

, in consideration of the Motion to

Withdraw as Counsel, the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County for it to determine whether to permit Attorney Robert S. Horwitz to

withdraw. If the court permits Attorney Horwitz to withdraw, it is to appoint new counsel,

who is experienced in this area of the law, to represent N.L. for allocatur review.

As this is a Children’s Fast Track matter, the Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to enter its order on remand within 14 days and to

promptly notify this Court of its determination.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Injet Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2004 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  May 13, 2004
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 100-2 Filed 08/04/2005 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:17-mj-00715-KAJ Doc #: 10 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 30
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:17-mj-00715-KAJ Doc #: 10 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 31
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Number: 333-64351

Asset Backed Securities Corp
Home Equity Loan Trust Series 2000-1
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 DE                    		13-3320910
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

11 Madison Ave., New York, NY  10010
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

212-325-1811
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 2000.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2000.

Not applicable.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENYI XIONG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-71021 

Agency No. A087-886-462 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 13, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Wenyi Xiong, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-71021 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility 

determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

We do not consider the materials Xiong references in his opening brief that 

are not part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963-64 

(9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on inconsistencies as to when Xiong first learned about Christianity, the date 

of his alleged persecution, the number of times the police interrogated him, the 

churches he attended in the United States, and his occupation in China. See id. at 

1048 (adverse credibility finding reasonable under the totality of the 

circumstances). Xiong’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See 

Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, in the absence of credible 

testimony, in this case, Xiong’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. 

See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Xiong’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same testimony the 

agency found not credible, and Xiong does not point to any other evidence in the 
3 16-71021 

record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in China. See 

id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 9, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 10-15051

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00094-JOF-LTW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ROMEO ST. ROMAIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(July 9, 2012)

Before EDMONDSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Romeo St. Romain appeals his sentence of imprisonment of 57

months after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United
States by filing false income tax returns. 18 U.S.C. § 286. St. Romain argues that

his sentence is unreasonable. We affirm.

We review the reasonableness of a sentence under a deferential standard for

abuse of discretion. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41, 128 S. Ct. 586, 591

(2007).

St. Romain’s sentence is reasonable. The sentence is more than a year below

the applicable guideline range of 70 to 87 months of imprisonment and less than

half the statutory maximum sentence of 120 months of imprisonment. The district

court considered St. Romain’s argument about his criminal history and

immigration status, but the district court was entitled to reject St. Romain’s request

for a greater variance. The district court did not abuse its discretion.

AFFIRMED.

2