3053G9

FIL E PLAN

3.68

RECONNAISSANCE REPORT ] CALIFORNIA GULCH *" RAILROAD YARD AREA

Prepared for:

DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD DENVER, COLORADO

February 8,1995

Prepared by:

.MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION ^Engineering, Construction & Environmental Group

7100 East Belleview Avenue, Suite 300

Englewood, Colorado 80111

(303) 793-5000
L

RECONNAISSANCE REPORT

CALIFORNIA GULCH

RAILROAD YARD AREA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1

2.1 Investigation Area Description 1

2.2 Site History 2

3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES 2

3.1 Railroad Yard Assessment 3

3.2 Materials Inventory 3

4.0 SUMMARY 7

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Map Figure 2 Investigation Areas

Figure 3 Visual Slag Deposits and Lead Concentration Contours, 0-1" Depth

U TABLES

Table 1 D&RGW Railroad Yard Slag Inventory

it

t

t APPENDICES

I Appendix A Photo Log Appendix B Daily Work Activities Log

MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Reconnaissance Report (RR) provides results of the field investigation assessment and

inventory of materials at the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Yard in Leadville, CO. It is submitted pursuant to Section 4.1, Assessment and Inventory, of the Draft Final

Sampling and Analysis Plan prepared for the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad

(September 14, 1994) by Morrison Knudsen Corporation (MK).

The scope of the field investigation was to:

»• Locate, map and photograph areas of concern, especially areas that show signs of

fine slag, i.e., less than one quarter inch sieve size.

* Distinguish the difference between types of materials in areas of concern, including

cinder, coal, charcoal, clinker and lead slag. Size the lead slag in areas of concern

to determine the approximate percentage of fines associated with this area.

» Note evidence of the impact on surrounding environment due to presence of slag

material. This includes the affect s of windblown dust and stress on vegetation

present at the site.

Field activities were conducted on September 15 through 16,1994 by two Morrison Knudsen

; personnel. Doug Uhland, of MK headed the reconnaissance and documentation effort while

Bill Klawitter (MK) assisted with location measurements and sample and vegetal

 descriptions. Mike Schaubs of Jacobs Engineering was on site to monitor the MK effort as

a representative for the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

iL.

2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND

 2.1 Investigation Area Description

L The D&RGW railroad yard is located near the north end of the town of Leadville, CO,

approximately 100 miles southwest of Denver, CO at an elevation of 10,000 feet mean sea

w

 level. See Figure 1. The railroad yard encompasses an area of roughly 43 acres and is

crossed by abandoned rail lines and access roads. A single story, wood-frame building

. MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION

 bb\1CB3\R-Fnl002 1 [Rev 0,02/08/B5]

L
stands on the property at the corner of State Highway 24 and 12th Street. A 200-foot long

concrete and earth loading dock is located near the south end of the property. Vegetation

on the property is limited to native grasses, sage and other native plant species.

The railroad yard is surrounded by a mixture of residential housing on the south and west,

commercial establishments on the north and Leadville, Colorado & Southern Railroad

(LCSR) property on the east. The railroad yard is bounded by 12th Street on the south, the

State Highway 24 on the west and 17th Street and the LCSR property on the north and east

respectively.

22 Site History The railroad yard has seen over 130 years of transportation activities. Silver, gold, copper,

lead, and zinc were mined by hardrock and placer methods from a major sulfide/carbonate

ore deposit The Yak Tunnel, draining into California Gulch, is the main point-source

discharge of acidic metal-laden water in California Gulch. This tunnel drains hardrock

mining areas with high proportions of sulfide minerals. In 1983, California Gulch was

placed on the EPA's National Priorities List because of activities associated with the loading

of heavy metal concentrations to the Arkansas River.

3 .0 FIELD ACTIVITIES

The railyard property was essentially divided into 20 investigative areas in order to

systematically locate and map potential areas of concern at the site. Fifteen (15) of the

investigative areas were staked out by field personnel with a measuring tape and were

centered generally on the loading dock area of the site (see Figure 2). These IS

investigative areas were roughly 200 feet square and were labelled units A-O. Areas of

concern appeared to be more concentrated near the location of the loading dock, therefore

the increased number of investigative units. The north end of the site was divided into 5

investigative areas P-T. These areas were larger in size and were generally bounded by

remaining rail lines at the site. After the investigative areas were delineated, the assessment

procedures and materials inventory were initiated.

MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION

tab\1893\R-FnUK>2 Z (Ray 0.02/08/85]
r

3.1 Railroad Yard Assessment

Each investigative area was walked by MK field personnel and the EPA representative. The

team made note of areas of concern within each area and then assessed these areas for the

presence of slag materials. Observations of the type of process materials (i.e., cinder, coal,

charcoal, clinker or slag) located in the areas of concern were noted. If slag was identified,

its location was measured from permanent landmarks or from area boundaries. The area!

extent of the slag was measured and an estimate of the depth of the slag material was

determined.

A representative sample of any surficial slag found hi the areas of concern was run through

 \. a % inch sieve screen to determine the approximate percentage of fines associated with the

i material found in this area. Photographic evidence of sieve test was collected as part of the

investigation documentation. An assessment of the vegetation surrounding each area of

i concern was then performed and documented. Results of the railyard assessment can be

*" found in the following Materials Inventory section.

L* 32 Materials Inventory

;

 Area A - This 200* x 200* area is located hi the southwest corner of the site. Within its

u bounds is a 90 x 25 wood frame building that appears abandoned at this time. The

building fronts Highway 24 and is set back approximately 20 feet from the highway. Several

^ types of materials were found lying on the surface of Area A These materials included

some coal, asphalt and brick. No slag was found hi this area.

Area B - This 200 x 200 area is located east of Area A A rail line runs north to south

 through this area. Several types of materials were found on the surface of Area B. These

*" materials included mostly coal with some firebrick, soil and slag. The slag was determined

i to be surficial and to lie in a 25 x 10 area in the northwest corner of the area. The total

L. quantity of slag was estimated to about 1.2 cubic yard (CY). Upon running a representative

sample of the slag through the sieve, 50% of the material or 0.6 CY was estimated to be

^ fine slag material.

t __

i Area C - This 200 x 200 area is located east of Area B in the southeast corner of the site.

Coal was largely found in this area, but some surficial slag was also present along the access

road that crossed the area from north to south. The area of concern was roughly 20 feet

wide by 200 feet long and averaged between 0 and 3 inches in depth. Total quantity of slag

MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION

bb\18S3\R-FnL002 3 (R«v 0,02/08/85]
i

in this area was estimated to be 8.5 CY. The majority of the slag material located in this

area would be considered fines.

Area D - This 200 x 200 area is located north of Area C and contains a small continuation

of the access road found in Area C. Slag was used to surface the road in this area as well. The area that showed evidence of slag was approximately 15 feet wide, 50 feet long and

averaged 1V4 inches of depth. The total quantity of slag in this area is estimated to be

3.5 CY. A majority of the slag is considered to be less than

 1A inch in diameter or fine slag.

Area E - This 200 x 200* area is located north of Area B and contains the south end of the

loading dock. This location showed evidence of two specific areas of concern. The first

location was found just south of the loading dock. The area measured approximately

110 x 60 and was considered to be surficial (0-3 inches in depth). An estimate of the

volume of slag associated with this area is 30.6 CY of which 30% is considered to be fines. See Photograph #1. The second location was found just west of the loading dock and

covered approximately 2800 ft2. The estimated volume of slag associated with this area is

13 CY of which 60% were considered to be fines. See Photograph #2.

Area F - This 200 x 200* area is located north of Area A and adjacent to Highway 24. Some surficial slag was located in a 50*

 x 10* area just west of the loading dock. The

estimated volume of the slag is 3 CY of which 50% is considered to be less than 14 inch in

diameter. See Photograph #3.

Area G - This 200 x 200* area is located north of Area F and adjacent to Highway 24. Some isolated pieces of slag were found in the area, but generally the location showed

evidence of coal and cinder fines.

i~ Area H - This area is also 200 x 200 and encompasses most of the loading dock and the

bulk of the slag for the entire railyard. The area was split up into three areas of concern,

^ but this was mainly for measuring purposes. There was actually little distinction between

these areas and it is likely that all of the slag found in Area H was either a direct or indirect

i result of the loading operations.

I One area of concern was located west of the loading dock along a single set of railroad

tracks. Most of the slag had been utilized as a ballast for the trackage below the loading

MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION

bb\1t£3\FI-Fnl.002 4 (Rev 0.02/08/85}
[^ dock. Other fine slag was spread on either side of the tracks and appeared to act as a hard

working surface, providing adequate support to heavy vehicular traffic. This area of concern

i was measured to be 50 x 200 or 10,000 ft2 and may have been up to 8 inches deep directly

under the tracks. The slag at the edges of this area of concern is surficial. A rough

! estimate of the quantity of slag for this area of concern is 123.5 CY of which 40% is

^ considered to be fine slag. See Photograph #4.

i

k- Another area of concern is located at the north edge of the loading dock. The area was

measured to be 42 x 25 or 1,050 ft2 and was approximately 0-3 inches in depth. The

l_ quantity of slag in this location is estimated to be 5 CY, 50 % of which is considered

fine slag.

L

t* A third area of concern is located on top of the loading dock itself. Surficial slag was

1 spread over the entire 50 x 200 surface of the loading dock and over an 107 x 200 area

from the base of the loading dock ramp east to another set of tracks running north and

i south. The entire area of concern was estimated at 31,400 ft2 and the depth appeared to

^- be surficial, averaging between 0 and 3 inches. The total volume of slag in this area is

estimated at 145 CY of which 80% is fine slag. See Photograph #5.

w

Area I - This 200* x 200 area showed some signs of coal and cinder, but no slag was

\

i identified. An old car chassis and other metal parts and debris were also found abandoned

in this area.

)

bri Area J - This 200 x 200 area showed evidence of some coal fines but no slag was found.

i This area is located north of Area I and contains the point of termination of a short rail

- siding.

1L Area K - This 200*

 x 200 area is located north of the loading dock area and contains several

i

 sets of tracks. Most of this area is covered with a mix of surficial coal and slag. The depth

u

 of the slag materials is estimated between 0 and 3 inches. The quantity of slag was

approximately 185 CY but at least half of this material is considered to be coal. The

I quantity of slag material considered fines is estimated at 50% or about 46 CY of slag fines. See Photograph #7.

MORRISON KNUOSEN CORPORATION

bb\1«93\FKFnU»2 J [Rtv 0.02/08/B5]
L Area L - This 200 x 200*

 area located west of Area K and adjacent to Highway 24 has

several rail sidings passing through it. The area shows no signs of slag. Some coal and

: clinker were however, encountered in the area.

Area M- This 200" x 200* area is located north of Area Land adjacent to Highway 24. The

area is divided by a single set of railroad tracks that runs north and south. There was an

i area of concern located but upon further investigation, was discovered to contain only coal

^ and cinder materials. No slag was found in this area.

_ Area N- This 200* x 200 area is located east of Area M and contains several sets of tracks

including the main line dividing the area roughly in half diagonally, north and south. One

 area of concern was found near a rail switch. This area of concern was measured at

\m* approximately 10 x 10 and varied in depth from 4 to 8 inches. Coarse slag material was

1

 placed beneath the switch to provide ballast for the tracks. The quantity of slag associated

with this area was estimated to be 1.9 CY of which 30% was considered fine slag. See

j Photograph #8. L,

; Area O - This 200 x 200 area lies east of Area N and is divided roughly north and south

L by a single rail siding. Some cinder and coal fines were discovered in the area, but no slag

was found.

L Area P - Area P is roughly HOP x 300

s

 in area and is located north of Area M, adjacent to

1 Highway 24. The area encompasses approximately 330,000 ft2 or 7.5 acres. There was no

slag found in this large area and no areas of concern to mention.

i

u

 Area Q - This area is roughly 160 x 1025* or 3.8 acres. It lies east of Area P and contains

; two areas of concern. The first area of concern is located in the southeast corner of Area Q

*- and is approximately 75 x 25 in area. The slag material appears to be surficial or from 0 to

3 inches in depth. The quantity of slag associated with this area is estimated as 8.7 CY of L. which 50% is considered fine slag. A second area of concern was found in Area Q that was

measured at 75 x 10'. The slag was also surficial and its volume is estimated at 3.5 CY.

[^ It also contained approximately 50% fines. See Photograph #9.

i Area R - This area is roughly triangular in shape and contains approximately 4.5 acres. It

lies directly to the east of Area Q and is bounded on the east and west be railroad tracks.

L

MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION L bb\1<83\F^FnU)QZ O (Rev 0.02/08/85]
A single area of concern was found near the south end of Area R. It was measured at

25 x 10 and the depth of the slag was considered to be surficial. Total quantity of slag is

estimated at 12 CY of which 50% is considered fine slag.

Area S - This area lies east of Area R and is bounded by tracks on the west and the LCSR

property on the east. The area was determined to be approximately 3.8 acres. Two railroad

sidings crossed the area. No sign of slag was found in the area.

Area T - This area is located at the north end of the railyard site behind the commercial

establishments along Highway 24. The area comprises approximately 8.6 acres. Trace

quantities of slag were found between the railroad tracks approximately 100 feet from the

roadhouse building. The quantity of slag in this area was determined to be insignificant

compared to quantities found at other locations of the railyard.

Area U - This triangular area is located west of Highway 24 and north of 12th Street at the

southwest end of the railroad yard. It is an area of approximately 0.9 acres. The railroad

tracks cross Highway 24 and exit the railroad yard at this location. The area is residential

with houses on the northwest side and a small park located at the northwest corner of Highway 24 and 12th Street. No slag was found in this area.

4.0 SUMMARY L Slag was readily identifiable by its geomorphology and appearance. It was also discernable

! from other smelter products such as cinder, clinker and charcoal on general appearance and

weight.

i

^ Several areas at the railyard site were found to contain slag of various sizes. The areas of

concern totalled 23 acres, which represents roughly 5% of the total railroad yard property.

u Total volume of slag at the railroad yard site was estimated at 450 CY. The volume of fine

slag on the site was roughly estimated at 220 CY. Most of the slag encountered at the

^ railyard site was considered surficial, having a depth of between 0 and 3 inches. It was

apparent that slag in areas of heavier deposits was utilized as either a ballast to hold track

• in line and elevation or as a road base to provide support for heavy vehicular traffic. Some

MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION

bb\1833\R^nl.OC2 / (Rev 0,02/08/85]
IL

surfirial slag was found around the area of the loading dock where the transport activities

provided some spillage.

There does not appear to be a correlation between the areas of surfitial slag documented

with this investigation and the lead concentration contours determined for the 0-1" depth

(see Figure 3). The contours in this figure were developed from sample data provided

in 1991.

Vegetation at the railyard site is limited to native grasses, sage and other native plant

species. Autumnal temperature variations and recent nightly freezes had probably

contributed to dry and near dormant conditions of the site plant life. Although the plant

life appeared spotty in some locations, it did not appear to be unlike any other plant life of

mountainous or arid regions.

MORRISON KNUDSEN CORPORATION

bb\1883\Fl^nl.«a 6 [R«v 0, OZ/08/85]
FIGURES
JJJJJJJJJ

;•;. . is^-vo -'!•••!":«! :M'-^ v-..v:, v^v;h^:.J'-s;x\->H»::sr;:;p.^r;^x-;:u,.-^,:;^ >-,«?«« :/ -V ?0^;-'"V->^:;iJ"!

.:'Hft^ <•*•. : .,? i ^^^'""A'•« . • : : ;;';;;; . '.•'::J. v .v -v-:;';IV-•;"• * ? '.,.-• " rkH"!' ^ • %

V i I ! irhi?S'^v»»S'V : ;.\v-:r \

 ; v

 »KQV( . ';^C :i?^iS'S] ;

"""" ,/'^v ^ r" vr -?"-i-^^C^l^^%e^'^;-:-^

,,'/ ::^'- " s- ^:

: r

A-'------:^t'^S?MS^^^ %

f::•''.'.'.'.'..-•-••" ~""""'-\-, '' " *l'h^'^V:

'^''-<y^.^-&^.'•-'"'' '"'" W- -•.-

',"'•" " '-;-,.-'• ••r.w.-il'i-r^- - r ; ;;• .v«^«•::,.•••'• ,•••••-'"---i- . , ________.. w::i.;

>-^>.'^ '••!....-^^---.:;:... ____,./.....,;;> ../ I •""

LEGEND:

WaRGW RAILROAD PROPERTY

D4RGW RAIL YARD

D4RGW RAILROAD EASEMENT

COLORADO

north

SCALE FEET

1000" 2000

<CPO: 10/24/84 [TIME: 1IOPU]>

CALIFORNIA GULCH CERCLA SIT E

lEADVILLE. COLORADO

FIGURE 1 D&RGW RAILROAD YAR

D SIT E LOCATION

DENVER & RIO GRANGE WESTER RAILROAD

tMORRISON-KNUDSE I HOP C. M«*«ImJufMuUNO CORPORATIO MM l*(*»)7a>MO N

O

fil l NAME <C*D) 940 PROECT

1893-940 840

^0*166/22/94^

tMMMNWOBi FIGURE t
t LEGENQL

D4RCW RAILROAD''"" " ' " " ' "'"

APPROXIMATE D&RGW RAILROAD PROPERTY LIME INVESTIGATIVE AREA BOUNDARIES

SLAG LOCATIONS

D&RGW RAIL YARD

north

SCALE FEET

500* 1000*

4CPO: 10/05/84 [TIME: 10:26 AM] >

CALIFORNIA GULCH CERCLA SIT E

__________LEADV1LLE. COLORADO__________ FIGURE 2

D&RGW RAIL YARD

INVESTIGATION AREA S

DENVER tc RIO GRANOE WESTERN RAILROAD

kMORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION r TWO &M«*»AMLjBl#Moo&CO (Dili ftfc(309?B3-aoOC

pooJDrr

1893-940

tarns

940

•4O 011A.DWC |CAH:6/22/9«

(RAWIHC NUMBER FIGURE 2
;177700

0

LLLbIL1Li

LEGEND:

APPROXIMATE £Mf!GW RAILROAD PROPERTY LINE INVESTIGATIV E AREA BOUNDARIES

SLAG LOCATIONS

DfcRGW RAIL YARD

LEAD CONCENTRATION

•—— 5000—— 5000 ISOPLE1H

4000—— 4000 INTERMEDIATE ISORETH

3000—— 3000 INTERMEDIATE ISOPLET

2000 INTERMEDIATE ISOPLETH

1000 ISOPLETH

north

SCALE FEET

5001

1000

CALIFORNIA GULCH CERCLA SIT E

LEADV1LLE. COLORAOO FIGURE 3 D&RGW RAIL YARD

A ND LEAALD CONCENTRATION CONTOURS, 0-1 DEPTH

DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD

MORRISON-KNUDSE 7100 C. *trt~ AmJ»»CTOi)d.e N CORPORATIO O Mill M;(3a3)7»J-aoO N

O

F1U MOie (CAD) 940 O17A.OWS |DA1E»/22/t4

<CPD: 10/24/B4 [HUE: 11:30 AM] > 940

ORAKNSHUiiCR HCURE 3
r r

r r~- r rr r r ' \ i. i r • i— i
u

L

L

i , L

L

TOTALS 42.7

TABLE 1, D&RGW RAILROAD YARD SLAG INVENTORY

September 15,1994

j^^^ll^p^^^^^^^^^^^^^pp^l^^^^^l^l^p^^pp^p^^^^^^^^^^^^l^^^

Area A AreaB AreaC AreaD AreaE

AreaF AreaG AreaH

Areal AreaJ AreaK AreaL AreaM AreaN AreaO AreaP AreaQ

AreaR AreaS AreaT AreaU

(ac.)

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

7.6

3.8

4.5

3.8

8.6

0.9

(sq.ft.)

NA

250

4000

750

6600

2800

500NA

10000

1050

31400 NANA

40000 NANA

100 NANA

1875

750

250 NANANA

(inches)

NA

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5NA

4

1.5

1.5NANA

1.5NANA

6NANA

1.5

1.5

1.5NANANA

(CY)

NA

1.2

18.5

3.5

30.6

13.0

2.3NA

123.5

4.9

145.4 NANA

i 92.6 NANA

1.9NANA

8.7

3.5

1.2NANANA

NA

50

90

90

30

60

50NA

40. * 80 *. »

v

j j -W y NANA

50NANA

30NANA

50

70

50NANANA

(CY)

NA

0.6

16.7

3.1

9.2

7.8

1.2NA )f- 49.4

3.9

72.7NANA ' 46.3NANA

0.6NANA

4.3

2.4

0.6NANANA

100325

50% of material at this location are coal fines.

450.4 218.6

f:\klawftte\qp\table_1 .wq1 10/05/94
1i

u

APPENDICES

LuL
Color Photo(s)

T he followin g photos contain color

that does not appear in the scanned

images. To view the actual images please

contact the Superfun d Record Center

at (303) 312-6473.
Photo No.

l

Site Name:

California Gulch

Leadville. CO

Location:

D&RGW Railvard

AreaE_____

Photographer/Witness Doug Uhland/Bil l Klawittcr

Date 9/15/94______Time NA________ Direction NA

Description Sieve test of 110* x 60* area of concern showing

resulting 30% fine slae content.

Photo No.

2

Page__L

Of___4

Photographer/Witness Doug Uhland/Bil l Klawitter

Date 9/15/94_____Time N/A________ Direction NA

Description Sieve test of 40 x 70* area of concern showing resulting

60% fine slae content __________________
Photo No.

3

Site Name:

California Gulch

Leadville. CO

Location:

D&RGW Railvard

Areas F & H

Photographer/Witness Doug Uhland/Bil l Klawitter

Date 9/15/94______Time NA________ Direction NA

Description Sieve test of SO* x 10* area of concern within Area F showing

resulting 50% fine slag content.________________________

Photo No.

4

Page 2

Of___4

Photographer/Witness Doug Uhland/Bil l Klawitter

Date 9/15/94_____Time N/A________ Direction NA

Description Sieve test of 5ffx 200 area of concern within Area H showing

resulting 40% fine slag content.______________________
Photo No.

5

Site Name:

California Gulch

Leadville. CO

Location:

D&RGW Railvard

Areas H & K

Photographer/Witnes s Doug Uhland/Bil l Klawittcr

Date 9/15/94______Time NA________ Direction NA

Description Sieve test performed directly east of loading dock in Area H showing

80% fin e slag content._________________________________

Photo No.

6

Page

Of

Photographer/Witness Doug Uhland/Bil l Klawitter

Date 9/15/94_____Time N/A________ Direction NA

Description Corresponds to Photo No. 7 in Daily Work Activities Field Log.

Sieve test in Area K showing 50% fine slag content.______________
Photo No.

7

Site Name:

California Gulch

Leadville. CO

Location:

D&RGW Railyard

Areas N & O

Photographer/Witness Doug Uhland/Bil l Klawitter

Date 9/15/94______Time NA________ Direction NA

Description Sieve test of 10* x 10* area of concern within Area N showing the

resulting 30% fine slag content.___________________________

L

Photo No.

8

Page_4_

Of___4

Photographer/Witness Doug Upland/Bil l Klawitter

Date 9/15/94_____Tune N/A________ Direction NA

Description Sieve test of Iff x 75 area of concern within Area O showing the

resulting 70% fine slag content._________________________
Poor Quality Source Document

T he followin g document images

have been scanned from the best

available source copy.

To view the actual hard copy, contact the

Superfun d Records Center at 303-312-6473
Figure Dl ____ DAILY WORK ACTIVITIES LOG

Reld Activity:

Location: _

I *

±_ Start Date: _£_±AL

_ Finish

Date: a *? / * 'T Weather <,+

TIME AcnvmES

S x

v »J c'- i

CL

Activities Summary:.

eam Signatures: 1..

2.. Page ' of
Figure Dl DAILY WORK ACTIVITIES LOG

Reld Activity:, Location: __

Date: ____

Start Date:

Rnish

Weather

TIME ACTIVITIES

-jfe

 '

-*

7*

{-

L y A ,

/$* /'- /"*'' / '*

f <' .,»*£•> •

/

Activities Summary:,

*

learn Signatures: 1..

2. Page of
Figure Dl DAILY WORK ACTIVITIES LOG

Reld Activity:

Location:. Date: __

Start Date:

Rnish Date:. Weather ___

TIME ACTIVITIES

-L T

C^raJ"

\

\ (

Activities Summary..

Team Signatures: 1..

2.. Page of
Figure 1)1 DAILY WORK ACTIVITIES LOG

Reld Activity:

Location: _

Date: __

Start Date:

Finish Date:

Weather. _

TIM E AcnvmES

j> S

5"

^

•'J.S

Activities Summary.,

learn Signatures: 1..

2.. Page o

*
Figure Dl DAILY WORK ACTIVITIES LOG

Reld Activity Location:

Start Hfltp. <?//*' / W

Finish Datar

Date! f7/J/*/- / WbflthP r

TIME

Activities Summ;

AcnvmES

J•fptfAt'c /(}' y ?i- ><" ^yL-*^ -7^^^L^

-£~is ?• i j£- -»-j

£

4

/Alj^o C"

/"V

,/7 Hfc*S7

t -, ~ /

V-4* Jte$<~*4a^ /C ^J^7 ^t^cf^L^^-v^

 ^ , ' *

,^-^-^ X^i^ ^ :ry /^, y

1

-

*

«»

.

ary:

Team Signatures:

2. Page of

L