alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          35,503
<SECURITIES>                                    62,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     89,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               193,396
<PP&E>                                         154,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,922
<BONDS>                                         61,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,000
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   267,644
<SALES>                                        428,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               428,219
<CGS>                                          317,868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  317,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               120,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,940)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,741)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-242

vs.

DAY-MONTH BEHAVORAL, District Judge Thomas M. Rose

HEALTH CARE, INC., et al. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This civil case is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion to stay discovery and

summary judgment motion deadlines. Doc. 35. For good cause shown, the parties’ joint motion 

is GRANTED. All discovery in this matter is hereby STAYED, as requested in the motion, for 

45 days. The Court hereby schedules a status conference, by telephone, with counsel for both 

sides present, on September 9, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. Counsel shall call: 1-888-278-0296, enter 

access code 2725365, security code 123456, and wait for the Court to join the conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: July 19, 2019 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20405

 

ALVY T McQUEEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

NANCY K JOHNSON; SUSIE M WONG;

MARK W HUGHES,

Defendants-Appellees.

*****************************************************************’

No. 98-20451

ALVY T McQUEEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;

SUSIE M WONG; MARK W HUGHES;

NANCY K JOHNSON, Magistrate Judge

Defendants - Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CA-95-H-1453 & H-91-CV-329)

 

March 4, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50758

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY RAY LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(MO-96-CR-139-1)

October 6, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

John n y Ray Lewis appeals his jury trial convictions for conspiracy to

distribute c ocaine base and for the distribution thereof. He claims: (1) insufficiency

of the evidence of conspiracy; (2) abuse of discretion in admitting Fed.R.Evid.

404(b) evidence of other acts; (3) error in determining drug quantity for sentencing

purposes; and (4) “sentencing entrapment.”

Our review of the record and bri efs persuades that the conviction for1 United States v. Laury

, 49 F.3d 145 (5 th Cir. 1995); United States v. Inocencio

, 40

F.3d 716 (5 th

Cir. 1994).

2 United States v. Bentley-Smith , 2 F.3d 1368 (5 th Cir. 1993).

3 United States v. Vine , 62 F.3d 107 (5 th Cir. 1995).

4 United States v. Washington , 44 F.3d 1271 (5 th Cir. 1995).

2 conspiracy to distribute cocaine base was not a manifest miscarriage of justice, 1

there was no abuse of discretion in the admission of the Rule 404(b) evidence, 2 and

no clear error in the determination of the relevant quantity of drugs for sentencing

purposes. 3 Finally, assuming without deciding that sentencing entrapment is a

viable proposition in this circuit, Lewis has not demonstrated that he was induced

by the government to deal in greater amounts of the contraband than that to which

he was disposed in order to increase his sentence exposure. 4

The convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 2:18-mj-00322-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 1 of 4  PAGEID #: 12

Case: 2:18-mj-00322-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 2 of 4  PAGEID #: 13

Case: 2:18-mj-00322-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 3 of 4  PAGEID #: 14

Case: 2:18-mj-00322-KAJ Doc #: 2 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 4 of 4  PAGEID #: 15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000

<S>                                                     <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                          AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                            OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<CASH>                                                       31,773
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 2,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                  62,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            104,641
<PP&E>                                                      122,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                               62,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              172,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        44,913
<BONDS>                                                       8,260
<COMMON>                                                         14
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  113,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                172,665
<SALES>                                                      86,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             86,802
<CGS>                                                        66,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                66,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             19,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             (467)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               1,236
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             723
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    723
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 $0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 $0.05


</TABLE>
Bank Records

Sent to Shuklin address

1

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 231-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1489
Bank Records

2

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 231-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 2 of 7 PAGEID #: 1490
Bank Records

3

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 231-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 3 of 7 PAGEID #: 1491
Bank Records

4

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 231-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 4 of 7 PAGEID #: 1492
Bank Records

5

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 231-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 5 of 7 PAGEID #: 1493
Bank records show Shuklin used business 

accounts for personal use

• E.g., Chase Account -2212

• Payment to Capital One for 

Shuklin’s credit card

• Payment for Shuklin’s mortgage

6

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 231-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 6 of 7 PAGEID #: 1494
Bank records show Shuklin used business 

accounts for personal use

• E.g., Chase Account -2212

• Payment for Shuklin’s Lexis

7

Case: 1:18-cr-00109-DRC Doc #: 231-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page: 7 of 7 PAGEID #: 1495
Case 1:00-cr-00093-SAS Document 47 Filed 12/28/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:00-cr-00093-SAS Document 47 Filed 12/28/2005 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7052
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BETTY J. MURPHY, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-7274
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BETTY J. MURPHY, Defendant - Appellant.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-89-280-WS, CA-96-632-6)2 Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Betty J. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Murphy , Nos. CR-89-280-WS; CA-96-632-6 (M.D.N.C. July 18, 1997 and Aug. 15, 1997). We deny Appellant's motions for transcripts at government expense, unsealing of documents, additional briefing, appointment of counsel, and reinstatement of in forma pauperis status. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Applied Innovation Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William H. Largent, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                   /s/ William H. Largent
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   William H. Largent, President and Chief
                                   Executive Officer of Applied Innovation Inc.
                                   March 7, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerMay 1, 2007




23
Boyd, Christopher 

From: 

Sent: 

Rogers, Bob [Bob.Rogers@shelbycountytn.gov] 

Friday, April17, 2015 4:19PM 

To: Holt, Jim; Boyd, Christopher; Keith_Head@deq.state.ms.us; Kenny.Monroe@kimleyhorn.com; Horton, Kate 

Cc: Zerwekh, Tyler: Elliott_Bickerstaff@deq. state. ms.us; Jerry_Beasley@deq.state. ms. us; 

Dallas _Baker@deq. state. ms. us 

Subject: April 24th meeting 

This is a reminder and confirmation of the meeting location next Friday for our maintenance plan/SIP discussion 

between our program, Mississippi Air program staff, and local MPO staff. 

Start time will be 10:30 and we will meet in our office on Jefferson. Specifically, we have reserved the 3'' floor 

conference room. We will have a conference-capable phone, so if anyone wishes or needs to call in, the number to call 

is (901)222-2776 with 17897# as the access code. 

Please let me know how many vehicles to expect so we can reserve parking on our lot. 

See you next week. 

Bob Rogers, Manager 

Pollution Control 

Shelby County Health Department 

814 Jefferson Ave. 

Memphis TN 38105 

(901)222-9599 

Bob Rogers, Manager 

Pollution Control 

Shelby County Health Department 

814 Jefferson Ave. 

Memphis TN 38105 

(901)222-9599 

From: Rogers, Bob 

Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:14 AM 

To: 'Keith_Head@deq.state.ms.us' 

Cc: Dallas Baker@deq.state.ms.us; Elliott Bickerstaff@deq.state.ms.us; Jerrv Beasley@deq.state.ms.us 

Subject: RE: Need to change our proposed meeting date. Can we move it to April 20? 

Great. We'll find a place. It may be our office just to be sure we can have a conference line. 

Bob Rogers, Manager 

Pollution Control 

Shelby County Health Department 

814 Jefferson Ave. 

Memphis TN 38105 

(901)222-9599 

1
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Abaxis, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: February 9, 2010
    /s/ Clinton H. SeversonClinton H. SeversonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 801 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 801

 Authorizing the use of the atrium in the Philip A. Hart Senate Office 
      Building for a piano performance by Senator Lamar Alexander.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2020

Mr. Blunt submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the atrium in the Philip A. Hart Senate Office 
      Building for a piano performance by Senator Lamar Alexander.

    Resolved, That the atrium in the Philip A. Hart Senate Office 
Building is authorized to be used from 3:30 p.m. until 6:30 p.m. on one 
day during December 14, 2020 through December 18, 2020, for a piano 
performance by Senator Lamar Alexander.
                                 <all>
```
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: May 19, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2014-0864 Federal Express Corporation ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2014SW700042 Respondent
DISMISSAL ORDER OnMay 17, 2016, the Complainant filed aNotice ofWithdrawal ofSecond Amended Complaint, stating that, upon further review, they have determined legal enforcement action is not warranted inthis case. Pursuantto 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such withdrawal, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the case withprejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that these proceedings are dismissed withprejudice. As a result, the prehearing conference scheduled for June 15, 2016 is cancelled.

Attachment: Service List 

# --p~--

**~LAS** M. RAWALD Administrative LawJudgeSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591. Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Greg Stofko, Respondent's Counsel 1700 PennsylvaniaAve., N.W. Suite 950 Washington, D.C. 20006 TEL: 202-393-9285 FAX: 202-628-0654 EMAIL: greg.stofko@fedex.com Allan H. 

### Horowitz, Respondent's Counsel Dentons US LLP 1900 K StreetNW Washington, DC 20006 TEL: 202-496-7356 James Archier, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Enforcement Division, Southwest 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5945 ONE COPY 

### DocketNo. FAA-2014-0864 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. MaiL For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.

### The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,648
<SECURITIES>                                    38,053
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (613)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,368
<PP&E>                                          15,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,443)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,749
<SALES>                                         23,932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,932
<CGS>                                            7,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,873
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,709
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,803
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,803
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Jordan Antonio Jarrell,

Plaintiff,

V. Case No. 2:18-cv-691

Jane/John Doe, Judge Michael H. Watson

Defendant. Magistrate Judge Deavers

ORDER

On August 17, 2018, Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom this case was

referred, issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), EOF No. 4,

recommending that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to

comply with the July 16, 2018, Deficiency Order, EOF No. 2.

The R&R advised PlaintiffJordan A. Jarrell of his right to file objections to the

same and specifically advised that the failure to timely object would result in a

waiver of the rightto de novo review by the Undersigned as well as a waiver of the

right to appeal the decision of the District Court. R&R 2-3, ECF No. 4. The time for

filing objections has passed, and none were filed.

Having received no objections, the Court ADOPTS the R&R, ECF No. 4, and

DISMISSES this case without prejudice. The Clerk shall remove ECF No. 4 from

the Court's pending motions list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MrCHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT