alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 4.12    
    


 Table of Warrant Grants  


        Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (the "Company") issues warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock. 



        The
warrants are documented pursuant to the form of warrants attached hereto as Exhibit 4.5 through Exhibit 4.11. 


        The
following table sets forth the principal terms of the warrant grants held by the selling stockholders named in the prospectus ("Prospectus") included as a part of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-156408) initially filed by the registrant on December 22, 2008: 



													
	Name of Warrant Holder



 
	 	Form of

Warrant 	 	Date of

Expiration 	 	# of

Warrants

Granted 	 	Exercise

Price 	 
	 Alfred Rattenni
	 	A	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	50,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 Erich Tengelsen
	 	A	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	50,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 William C. Turner, Trustee of Tuner Trust
	 	A	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	250,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 Tyler Christian Guthrie Exempt Irrevocable Trust
	 	A	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	250,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 Cooper Keith Guthrie Exempt Irrevocable Trust
	 	A	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	250,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 Roberts Wesleyan College
	 	B	 	 	7/1/2014	 	 	59,747	 	$	0.25	 
	 Comerica Ventures Incorporated
	 	C	 	 	4/12/2014	 	 	80,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 Comerica Ventures Incorporated
	 	C	 	 	4/9/2015	 	 	180,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 Venturetek L.P.
	 	D	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	1,450,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 Leonard Katz
	 	D	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	175,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 Jonathan Turkel
	 	D	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	175,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 Linda M. Clugston
	 	E	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	175,000	 	$	0.65	 
	 R.Wayne Clugston
	 	E	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	1,375,000	 	$	0.63	 
	 Roberts Wesleyan College
	 	E	 	 	12/1/2013

12/1/2013

12/1/2013	 	 	75,000

73,307

64,547	 	$
$
$	2.00

2.00

0.50	 
	 Scott Turner
	 	F	 	 	12/1/2013

12/1/2013

12/1/2013

12/1/2013	 	 	150,000

600,000

600,000

500,000	 	$
$
$
$	1.00

1.00

0.50

0.25	 
	 David Vande Pol
	 	F	 	 	12/1/2013

12/1/2013

12/1/2013	 	 	50,000

25,000

550,000	 	$
$
$	0.50

2.00

0.50	 
	 *
	 	F	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	18,000	 	$	0.50	 
	 *
	 	F	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	20,000	 	$	0.50	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	10,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	20,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	50,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	10,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	10,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	25,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	25,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	20,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	50,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	3,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	3,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	3,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	1,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	5,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	10,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	15,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	25,000	 	$	0.25	 
	 *
	 	G	 	 	12/1/2013	 	 	20,000	 	$	0.25	 











	*
	Denotes
warrant holders that are not named as selling stockholders in the Prospectus. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.12
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 87 

Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the committees of 

the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the 

committees of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That a collection of the rules of the commit2 tees of the Senate, together with related materials, be 

3 printed as a Senate document, and that there be printed 

4 250 additional copies of such document for the use of the 

5 Committee on Rules and Administration. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7550
BOBBY MICHAEL GILYARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MCCORMICK COUNTY JAIL; GEORGE REID, Sheriff of McCormick County, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 97-7551
BOBBY MICHAEL GILYARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT M. STEWART, Chief of South Carolina Law Enforcement Division ("SLED"); SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION; WHITTLE, Sheriff; COLUMBIA COUNTY (GEORGIA), Defendants - Appellees.2 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-97-2271-5-23, CA-97-2743-5-23) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 24, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Michael Gilyard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals two district court orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions accepting the magistratejudge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Although Appellant filed objections to the magistrate judge's recommendations,the objections were not specific to the recommendations. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. Gilyard v. McCormick County Jail and Gilyard v. Stewart , Nos. CA97-2271-5-23 and CA-97-2743-5-23 (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 1997). We deny Appellee Whittle's motion to dismiss in appeal No. 97-7551. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 1:38 PM

To: Walden, Greg

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); 'nate@prenav.com'

Subject: Request for Additional Information - PreNav Inc.

Dear Mr. Walden:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No.

FAA

− 2015

− 1261). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

* Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e., fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter than air) for the proposed UAS

operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in

the aircraft manual.

* Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1,

Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed

‐ set filming from

your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 7/8/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 10, 2022

No. 04-22-00725-CV

David Gene BECKA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR1257

Honorable Andrew Wyatt Carruthers, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In our November 8, 2022 order, we advised Appellant that his notice of appeal was late, 

but it was filed within fifteen days after the notice was due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. We 

implied a motion for extension of time, see Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 

1997), and we ordered Appellant to file a motion for extension of time that reasonably explains 

the need for an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)); In re E.K.C., 

486 S.W.3d 614, 616 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2016, no pet.). 

Appellant timely filed a response. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the 

notice of appeal is GRANTED; the notice is deemed timely filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3; 

Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 774 S.W.2d 668, 670 (Tex. 1989).

 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of November, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James A. Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JAMES A. FONTAINE                                              
|James A. Fontaine                                                  
|Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                                   
|Date: April 30, 2008
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1









                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-16220, Form S-8 No. 33-16084, Form S-8 No. 33-60926, and Form
S-8 No. 333-10813 pertaining to the Incentive Stock Option Plan, the
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan and the
1995 Stock Option Plan) of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. of our report
dated February 27, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                       /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP



Fayetteville, Arkansas
March 26, 1998
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  SpatiaLight,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned Officer of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to ss.  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  to his
knowledge, that:

            (1)   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                             /s/ROBERT A. OLINS
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Robert A. Olins
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                               and Principal Financial Officer


July 13, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4759

JAMES WAVERLY BREEDLOVE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham.

James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-01-63)

Submitted: April 25, 2002

Decided: May 6, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL

Louis C. Allen III, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, John W.

Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Pursuant to a written plea agreement, James Waverly Breedlove,

Jr., pled guilty to bank robbery. The agreement provided that "the

Government will make no recommendation to the Court as to what

sentence the defendant should receive within the sentencing guideline

range." At sentencing, the court determined Breedlove’s guideline

range to be 151 to 188 months. Contrary to the terms of the plea

agreement, the Assistant United States Attorney argued in favor of a

sentence at the higher end of the range. The court thereafter imposed

a 180-month sentence. 

Breedlove argues, and the Government concedes, that this constitutes a breach of the plea agreement. Due to the Government’s breach

—albeit inadvertent—of the plea agreement Breedlove failed to

receive the benefit of his bargain. See Santobello v. New York, 404

U.S. 257, 262 (1971). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand

for resentencing before a different district court judge. See United

States v. Peglera, 33 F.3d 412, 415 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v.

Brown, 500 F.2d 375, 378 (4th Cir. 1974). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

2 UNITED STATES v. BREEDLOVE
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated October 29, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-206738) of Smart Trust, Zacks
GARP Composite 35 Trust, Series 7.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 29, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Tamera Brown, et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

v.

City of Cincinnati, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18cv412

Judge Dlott 

Magistrate Judge Litkovitz

Plaintiffs hereby move for a two-week extension of time to Nov. 25, 2019 to file a 

Memorandum in Opposition to the Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings filed 

on Oct. 14, 2019. The deadline is currently Nov. 11, 2019. Plaintiffs’ counsel requires this 

additional time because of a recent and unexpected reduction in personnel in Plaintiffs’ 

counsel’s office.

Counsel for the parties have conferred on this request and Defendants’ counsel have 

expressed that Defendants do not object to an extension. Plaintiffs have attached a proposed 

order to this motion.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Zachary Gottesman

Zachary Gottesman (0058675)

Gottesman & Associates, LLC

Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs

404 East 12th St., First Floor

Cincinnati, OH 45202-7463

T: 513-651-2121

F: 513-651-2131

zg@zgottesmanlaw.com

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A 

TWO-WEEK EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO 

MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON 

THE PLEADINGS

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 39 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 545
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Tamera Brown, et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

v.

City of Cincinnati, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18cv412

Judge Dlott 

Magistrate Judge Litkovitz

Plaintiffs’ motion for an extension of time to file a Memorandum in Opposition to 

Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs are to file 

any motions by Nov. 25, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: ________________ ________________________________________________

Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 39 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 546
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on Nov. 11 , 2019, a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was 

filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court’s 

electronic filing system. No copies of this filing are being mailed to any parties, as all parties 

are currently being served via the Court’s electronic filing system and thereby may access 

this filing through that system. 

/s/ Zachary Gottesman

Zachary Gottesman (0058675)

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 39 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 547
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 173 (Friday, September 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 54947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21771]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8452]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Afghanistan

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6), and Department of 
State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act and similar provisions of 
law in prior year Acts with respect to Afghanistan and I hereby waive 
this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 12, 2013.
William J. Burns,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-21771 Filed 9-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-02-P
```
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 24
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

         Each of the undersigned officers and directors of Applied Innovation
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby appoints Gerard B.
Moersdorf, Jr. and Curtis A. Loveland as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
or either of them, with power to act without the other, as his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, in his name and on his behalf, and in any and all capacities
stated below, to sign and to cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the Company's annual report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998, and any and all amendments thereto, hereby granting unto said
attorneys, and to each of them, full power and authority to do and perform in
the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all such capacities, every
act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully
as each of the undersigned could or might do in person, hereby granting to each
such attorney full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that either such attorney or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of
Attorney in counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 19, 1999.

DIRECTORS/OFFICERS:


          Signature                                            Title
          ---------                                            -----


/s/ Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr.                Chairman, President and Treasurer
--------------------------------            (Principal Executive Officer)
Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr.        

/s/ William H. Largent                      Senior Vice President - Operations,
--------------------------------            Chief Financial Officer
William H. Largent                          (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ John M. Spiegel                         Controller
--------------------------------            (Principal Accounting Officer)
John M. Spiegel                             

/s/ James H. Blough                         Director
--------------------------------
James H. Blough

/s/  Curtis A. Loveland                     Director
--------------------------------
Curtis A. Loveland

/s/ Gerard B. Moersdorf, Sr.                Director
--------------------------------
Gerard B. Moersdorf, Sr.

/s/  Richard W. Oliver                      Director
--------------------------------
Richard W. Oliver

/s/ Thomas H. Huseby                        Director
--------------------------------
Thomas H. Huseby

/s/ Alexander B. Trevor                     Director
--------------------------------
Alexander B. Trevor
f10kprwt031609draft.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing


 

	

Exhibit 10.4.2

PREMIERWEST BANCORP

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR TOM ANDERSON

          This Amendment dated effective January 5, 2009 (this “Amendment”) amends the Employment

Agreement by and among PremierWest Bancorp, PremierWest Bank, and Tom Anderson dated as of July

29, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”).



1.       Section 2.3 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:



          2.3       Termination Upon Retirement. Unless sooner terminated, Executive’s employment shall

          terminate upon his Retirement (defined below).



2.       Section 6.6 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:



          6.6        Retirement. Upon Executive providing 90 days notice of his termination of employment

          and Executive being at least 62 years old at the time of termination (“Retirement”).



3.       Except as specifically set forth herein, the Employment Agreement as previously executed shall

          continue in full force and effect as written. Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall

          have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

		
	PREMIERWEST BANCORP 	EXECUTIVE 
	 
	 
	By: _______________________________	
	             James Ford 	Tom Anderson 
	             President / Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 
	PREMIERWEST BANK 	 
	 
	 
	By: _______________________________	 
	             James Ford 	 
	             President / Chief Executive Officer 	 



- 1 -