alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

JERONE MCDOUGALD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SHANNON BEAR, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cv-498

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY

ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docs. 3, 6) 

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate 

Judge reviewed the pleadings and submitted a Report and Recommendation 

recommending that Plaintiff be Ordered to pay the full $400.00 filing fee within 30 days, 

and a Supplemental Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s motion 

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (Docs. 3, 6). Plaintiff objected to both 

Reports and Recommendations (Docs. 4, 7).1

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 

 1 Plaintiffs’ objections lack merit. Plaintiff does not set forth any evidence or authority to rebut 

the Magistrate Judge’s proper conclusion that Plaintiff is prohibited by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) from 

proceeding in forma pauperis in this case because three of his prior complaints were dismissed 

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and because he has not established 

particular facts showing that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 
of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Reports and Recommendations should be and are hereby adopted in 

their entirety. Accordingly: 

1. The Reports and Recommendations (Docs. 3, 6) are ADOPTED; 

2. Plaintiff’s objections (Docs. 4, 7) are OVERRULED; 

3. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5) is 

DENIED; 

4. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the full $400.00 filing fee ($350 filing fee plus 

$50 administrative fee) required to commence this action within thirty (30) 

days. Failure to pay the full $400.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days will 

result in the dismissal of this action; and

5. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this Order would not be 

taken in good faith. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 2/27/19 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of 
New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-67511, 333-64203, 
and 333-24615) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-023329, 333-13481, 333-65223, 
333-65193 and 333-65221) of our report dated March 2, 1999, on our audits of 
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of New 
Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. as of December 31, 1998, July 31, 1998, and 
July 31, 1997 and for the five months ended December 31, 1998 and for each of 
the three years in the period ended July 31, 1998 which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                  

San Diego, California
March 26, 1999
#### Commonwealth, Appellant, *v.*George Schollenberger.

*Constitutional law*— Interstate *commerce*— Original *package*— Oleomar*garine.*

Argued Jan. 18, 1895.

Appeal, No. 104, July T., 1894, by plaintiff, from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., Oot. T., 1898, No. 368, on special verdict.

Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Reversed.

See next preceding case.

*Carroll R. Williams*and *John C.*Johnson, *A. Morton*Cooper, *J. H. Shoemaker*and *George S.*Graham, district attorney, with them, for appellant.

*A. B.*Roney, *Richard C. Bale*with him, for appellee.

October 7, 1895:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Williams,

This appeal is from the judgment entered upon a special verdict in the-same form as that considered in the opinion just filed in Commonwealth v. J. Otis Paul, 170 Pa. 284. The questions raised are the same, and the same judgment must be rendered. The judgment is reversed and judgment is entered in favor of the commonwealth upon the special verdict.

The record is remitted for purposes of sentence and execution.
November 20

Judge Thomas M. Rose
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached
as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the
Report.
  By:
    /s/ Alberto R. Santa InesAlberto R. Santa InesChief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                    NABORS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                     YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                              --------------------------------------
                                                                 2001          2000          1999
                                                              -----------   -----------   ----------
                                                               (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIO AMOUNTS)
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>           <C>
Income before income taxes and extraordinary gain...........   $542,282      $226,707      $45,629
Add fixed charges as adjusted (from below)..................     63,774        37,655       31,165
                                                               --------      --------      -------
       Earnings.............................................   $606,056      $264,362      $76,794
                                                               --------      --------      -------
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense:
          Interest on indebtedness..........................   $ 22,921      $ 28,122      $30,088
          Capitalized.......................................      1,609         2,021          154
  Amortization of debt related costs(1).....................     37,801         7,248          307
  Interest portion of rental expense........................      3,052         2,285          770
                                                               --------      --------      -------
  Fixed charges before adjustments..........................     65,383        39,676       31,319
  Less capitalized interest.................................     (1,609)       (2,021)        (154)
                                                               --------      --------      -------
  Fixed charges as adjusted.................................   $ 63,774      $ 37,655      $31,165
                                                               --------      --------      -------
Ratio (earnings divided by fixed charges before
  adjustments)..............................................       9.27          6.66         2.45
                                                               --------      --------      -------
</Table>

---------------

(1) Includes deferred financing, discount and premium amortization
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

AED Aero, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63154

)

Under Contract No. SPE4A7-21-P-7329 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: William Selinsky, Esq.

 Whitcomb & Selinsky, P.C. 

 Denver, CO

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

 DLA Chief Trial Attorney

Angela M. DiOrio, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

 DLA Aviation

 Richmond, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 12, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63154, Appeal of AED Aero, Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 12, 2022

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICEROF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Boland T. Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|       | (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |
|                           | (2)      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|         | /s/ Boland T. Jones            |
|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                                       | Boland T. Jones                |
|                                       | Chief Executive Officer        |
|                                       | Premiere Global Services, Inc. |
|                                       | October 8, 2008                |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6529

ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIEUTENANT SOUCIER; LIEUTENANT HEARTLEY; EDWARD THOMAS; ZEB 

T. HEATH, JR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:13-ct-03247-BO)

Submitted: August 24, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas, III, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa 

N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH 

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alphonza Leonard Phillip Thomas, III, appeals the district 

court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

complaint and denying his motions to amend and for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thomas’s motions for 

appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government 

expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Thomas v. Soucier, No. 5:13-ct-03247-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan, 21, 2015;

Mar. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. and its subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-20925) of our report dated January 31, 2000, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc.
and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1999, which report is included in this
annual report on Form 10-K.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Raleigh, North Carolina
March 1, 2000
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

8/6/2019

 Southern District of Ohio

Susan Hale

3:18-CV-238

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Case is remanded tothe commissioner under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an immediate

award of benefits for the closed period of October 17, 2006, through June 2, 2015, case is terminated on

the Court's docket

✔ Michael J. Newman

Decision and Entry
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No.96-50444

Summary Calendar

_____________________

LONNIE D. CLARK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MIC LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(W-95-CV-48)

_________________________________________________________________

May 22, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lonnie D. Clark pleaded guilty to mail fraud concerning

misrepresentations he made to obtain insurance policies. His

conviction was affirmed by this court. United States v. Clark, No.

94-10833 (5th Cir. 1995) (unpublished). Clark appeals from the

dismissal, as frivolous, of this subsequent action against MIC Life

Insurance Co. (“MIC”). Clark contends generally that his federal

constitutional rights were violated by MIC and that it violated
- 2 -

Texas insurance and deceptive-trade-practices law regarding an

insurance policy purchased by Clark.

Clark does not contend that the district court erred by

holding his federal law claims barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S.

477 (1994), or that the district court erred by declining to

exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state-law claims. In

short, Clark has failed to brief the relevant issues for appeal.

His appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Clark is admonished that filing frivolous appeals in the

future, particularly appeals in which he names the insurance

companies he pleaded guilty of defrauding as appellees, will invite

the imposition of sanctions against him. To avoid such sanctions,

Clark should review any pending appeals to ensure that none of his

claims are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 10.38



 Exhibit 10.38 
 Summary of Translation of the 
 Technical Service Contract, by and between Natural Gas Development
Company of 
 Qinghai Oilfield and Beijing BHD Technology Co., Ltd. 
 On October 15, 2007, Beijing BHD Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd. executed an agreement with Natural Gas Development Company of Qinghai Oilfield to
provide service on a Multipurpose Fissure Shaper Technology. The project has been completed under the agreement and full payment is expected by November 30, 2008.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



By:

/s/    PAUL G. GABOSPaul G. Gabos Chief Financial Officer




November 13, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 666 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 666

Honoring the faithful and unwavering service of Civil Air Transport and 
                   Air America to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2020

    Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Mr. Rubio) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the faithful and unwavering service of Civil Air Transport and 
                   Air America to the United States.

Whereas, over the course of 4 decades, the courage, dedication to duty, superior 
        airmanship, and sacrifice of the men and women of Civil Air Transport 
        and Air America set high standards for future covert air operations;
Whereas, during the Cold War, aircrews and ground personnel of Civil Air 
        Transport and Air America gave selflessly in service to the worldwide 
        battle against communist oppression;
Whereas, across multiple active military theaters from the Far East to Southeast 
        Asia, the legendary men and women of Civil Air Transport and Air America 
        served heroically, and many of those men and women gave their lives in 
        the defense of freedom;
Whereas, often at great personal risk of enemy ground fire and possible capture, 
        Air America acted quickly and decisively to conduct search and rescue 
        operations to recover downed aviators in trouble, always fully embodying 
        the ``Airman's Creed''; and
Whereas the individuals of Air America performed these search and rescue 
        operations despite often outdated equipment, hazardous terrain, 
        dangerous weather, and the bureaucracy of their own governments: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the skill, bravery and loyalty of veterans 
        of Civil Air Transport and Air America; and
            (2) honors the sacrifices of veterans of Civil Air 
        Transport and Air America to defend freedom and protect the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of RMS Titanic,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K Amendment  No.2 for the period ending  February 28, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2002 (the "Report"),  I,
Gerald Couture, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gerald Couture
-------------------------
Gerald Couture
Chief Financial Officer
September 20, 2002
The Ho norable Elsijane Trimble Roy, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2166

___________ Gary Fountain, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Stone Container, Inc.; United * Eastern District of Arkansas. Paperworkers International Union, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 13, 1998 Filed: March 2, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gary Fountain appeals the district court & s adverse grant of summary judgment 1 onhis claims that his union breached its duty of fair representation and his employer breac hed a collective bargaining agreement. After a careful review of the record and the parties & submissions on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by th e district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant appellees & joint motion to strike portions of th e joint appendix.-2-

Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.