alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard E. Lundin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q/A of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control
over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 10, 2009 |  | /s/ Richard E. Lundin  
|                    |  | Richard E. Lundin      
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer



5
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 2 of 14 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 3 of 14 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 4 of 14 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 5 of 14 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 6 of 14 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 7 of 14 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 8 of 14 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 9 of 14 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 10 of 14 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 11 of 14 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 12 of 14 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 13 of 14 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 3:18-mj-00316-MJN Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/17/18 Page: 14 of 14 PAGEID #: 14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (Revised 4-20-10)

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

:

Plaintiff, : Case No.: 

-vs- : District Judge 

Magistrate Judge 

Defendant, :

MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

Pursuant to S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 83.3(e) and 83.4(a), , trial 

 (Name of Trial Attorney)

attorney for , in the above-referenced action, hereby moves the court to 

(Name of Party)

admit , pro hac vice to appear and participate as counsel or co-counsel

(Name of PHV Attorney)

 in this case for .

(Name of Party)

Movant represents that is a member in good standing

(Name of PHV Attorney)

 of the highest court of as attested by the accompanying certificate from that

(Name of State)

court and that is not eligible to become a member of the

(Name of PHV Attorney)

 permanent bar of this Court. This Motion is accompanied by the required $200.00 fee.

 understands that, unless expressly excused, he or 

(Name of PHV Attorney)

she must register for electronic filing with this Court promptly upon the granting of this Motion.

Tanker Pacific Chartering (2) Ltd.,

Lukoil Pan-Americas LLC

Kelly E. Mulrane

Tanker Pacific Chartering (2) Ltd.

J. Stephen Simms

Tanker Pacific Chartering (2) Ltd.,

J. Stephen Simms

Maryland

J. Stephen Simms

J. Stephen Simms

Case: 2:18-cv-00400-MHW-CMV Doc #: 6 Filed: 04/26/18 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 23
 ‘s relevant identifying information is as follows:

(Name of PHV Attorney)

Business telephone ____________________ Business fax _________________________

Business address ____________________________________________________________

 ____________________________________________________________

Business e-mail address _______________________________________________________

_______________________________________

(Signature of Trial Attorney)

_______________________________________

(Address)

_______________________________________

(City, State, Zip Code)

_______________________________________

(Telephone Number)

Trial Attorney for 

(Name of Party)

(Please attach required Certificate of Service)

J. Stephen Simms

410-783-5795 410-510-1789

Simms Showers LLP, 201 International Circle, Baltimore, Maryland 21030

jssimms@simmsshowers.com

s/ Kelly E. Mulrane

BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP

41 S. High Street, Suite 2600

Columbus, Ohio 43215

Tanker Pacific Chartering (2) Ltd.,

Case: 2:18-cv-00400-MHW-CMV Doc #: 6 Filed: 04/26/18 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 24
Case: 2:18-cv-00400-MHW-CMV Doc #: 6 Filed: 04/26/18 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 25
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICKIE ROBE RICHBURG,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 458 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 2240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00402]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8592]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Race to the End of the Earth''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Race to the End of the Earth,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of 
Idaho, Idaho Falls, ID, from on or about January 30, 2014, until on or 
about September 1, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: January 7, 2014.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-00402 Filed 1-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
September 18, 2015

Mr. William M. Mikkelson

Owner

First Defense Systems LLC

1109 Pleasant Valley Road

West Bend, WI 53095

Dear Mr. Mikkelson :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 45.23, 61.113, 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.203(a) and (b),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a), and part 21, Subpart H, of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you

should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your May 19, 2015, exemption request on behalf of First Defense Systems LLC

filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2084 , but we are unable to process your request any further.

Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to

consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

a t least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Br ittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ROBERT ARTHUR BREWSTER,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 13-1418 (D.C. No. 1:13-CR-00081-RBJ-1) (D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before LUCERO

, HOLMES , and BACHARACH , Circuit Judges.

After entering into a plea agreement th at included a waiver of his right to

appeal, Robert Arthur Brewster pleaded guilty to one count of producing child

pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). He was sentenced to 235 months of

imprisonment, lifetime supervis ed release, and $3,000 in restitution, and he forfeited

certain computer equipment. Notwithsta nding the waiver, Mr. Br ewster appealed.

* This panel has determined that oral ar gument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It ma y be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32. 1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit



### November 18, 2013

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - The government has moved to en force the appeal waiver under United States v.

Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315, 1325, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). In

response, through counsel, Mr. Brewster ha s conceded that the appeal waiver is

enforceable. And although we need not address a Hahn factor that the defendant

does not contest, see United States v. Porter , 405 F.3d 1136, 1143 (10th Cir. 2005),

our independent review c onfirms that all of the Hahn factors are satisfied.

The motion to enforce is grante d and the appeal is dismissed.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

DWIGHT LLOYD CASADY,

Appellant.

_3 o> <-i

No. 70319-6-1 5 •£"

UNPUBLISHED OPINION ^

<P

FILED: May 12, 2014

Per Curiam — Dwight Casady appeals his convictions for felony driving under

the influence and first degree driving while license suspended. His counsel contends,

and Casady argues pro se, that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it had a

"duty to return a verdict of guilty" if it found all the elements of the offense beyond a

reasonable doubt. This argument is controlled by our decision in State v. Moore, No.

69766-8-I (Wash. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2014) and the cases cited therein.

Casady raises several additional arguments in his pro se statement of additional

grounds for review. He contends he "wasn't found guilty of a felony DUI by the jury[.] I

was found guilty of a misdemeanor DUI . . . ." The jury found Casady guilty of "Driving

Under the Influence as charged in Count One." The charge in count one was "Felony

DUI."

Casady contends "it was reversible error to admit into evidence Convictions That

are over TEN years old." But RCW 46.61.502(6)(b)(i) expressly provides that a person

commits felony DUI if "[t]he person has ever previously been convicted of: Vehicular
No. 70319-6-1/2

homicide while under the influence . . . , RCW 46.61.520(1 )(a)." (Emphasis added.)

The parties stipulated that Casady had a prior conviction under RCW 46.61.520(1 )(a).

Next, Casady contends he had a right to be present at side bars that occurred

during his trial. Casady does not explain why this claim can be raised for the first time

on appeal. RAP 2.5(a). Nor does he indicate whether the side bars involved legal or

factual matters. See In re Pers. Restraint of Lord. 123 Wn.2d 296, 306, 868 P.2d 835,

870 P.2d 964 (1994) (defendant does not have a constitutional right to be present

during in-chambers or bench conferences between the court and counsel on legal

matters, at least where those matters "do not require a resolution of disputed facts");

State v. Miller, Wn. App. , 316P.3d 1143, 1150(2014). He thus fails to

demonstrate any basis for review or relief.

Finally Casady's claims ofineffective assistance of counsel are either too

conclusory to merit discussion, RAP 10.10(c) (appellate court will not consider

additional grounds for review that do not adequately inform the court of the nature of the

alleged errors), or involve matters outside the record.

Affirmed.

FOR THE COURT:

All
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

AED Aero, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63154

)

Under Contract No. SPE4A7

- 21

- P

- 7329 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : William Selinsky, Esq.

Whitcomb & Selinsky, P.C.

Denver, CO

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA Chief Trial Attorney

Angela M. DiOrio, Esq.

Trial Attorney

DLA Aviation

Richmond, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 12 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63154

, Appeal of AED Aero, Inc.

, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 12, 2022 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 10.4


 


Pacific
Special Acquisition Corp.


855
Pudong South Road

The World Plaza, 27th Floor


Pudong,
Shanghai

China 200120


 


Mr.
Jian Tu


c/o
Zhengqi International Holding Limited


855
Pudong South Road


The
World Plaza, 27th Floor


Pudong,
Shanghai


China
200120


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the
registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of Pacific Special Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier
of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case
as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
an affiliate of Mr. Jian Tu shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as
may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 855 Pudong South Road, The World Plaza, 27th Floor, Pudong, Shanghai,
China 200120 and at 40 Wall Street, 28th Floor, New York, New York 10005 (or any successor locations).  In
exchange therefore, the Company shall pay one of Mr. Tu’s affiliates the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date
and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Mr. Tu hereby agrees that he does not have any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim he
may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will
not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever. No party hereto may assign either this letter agreement
or any of its rights, interests, or obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other party, provided that
Mr. Tu may assign this letter agreement to an affiliate without the prior written approval of the Company. Any purported assignment
in violation of this paragraph shall be void and ineffectual and shall not operate to transfer or assign any interest or title
to the purported assignee.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	PACIFIC SPECIAL ACQUISITION
    CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Zhouhong Peng
	 	Name:	Zhouhong Peng
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer and 

Chief Financial
    Officer


 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/  Jian Tu	 
	 	By: Jian Tu
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00798]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9060-3]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed January 3, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through January 10, 2022 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20220004, Final, APHIS, OR, ADOPTION--Final Bighorn Sheep 
Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement, Contact: Kevin 
Christensen 503-820-2751.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service (APHIS) has adopted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service (USFWS) Final EIS No. 20210178, filed 11/23/2021 with the 
Environmental Protection Agency. The APHIS was a cooperating agency on 
this project. Therefore, republication of the document is not necessary 
under Section 1506.3(b)(2) of the CEQ regulations.

EIS No. 20220005, Draft, DOE, NAT, Proposed Energy Conservation 
Standards for Manufactured Housing, Comment Period Ends: 02/28/2022, 
Contact: Roak Parker 240-562-1645.
EIS No. 20220007, Final, USACE, LA, Upper Barataria Basin Louisiana 
Study, Review Period Ends: 02/14/2022, Contact: Patricia Naquin 504-
862-1544.

    Dated: January 12, 2022.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2022-00798 Filed 1-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WPI GROUP, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 25, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-24-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                          10,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,079,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                   262,500
<INVENTORY>                                    447,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,139,553
<PP&E>                                       1,642,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                 832,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,716,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,659,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,568
<OTHER-SE>                                (19,311,615)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,716,127
<SALES>                                     10,734,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,734,845
<CGS>                                        4,265,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,283,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,022,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,113,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,113,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (2,175,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,288,229)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.37)


</TABLE>