alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State of Ohio, et al,

Plaintiffs,

V.

Jordan Jarrell,

Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Case No. 2:18-cv-666

Judge Michael H. Watson

Magistrate Judge Kimberly Jolson

ORDER

On July 12,2018, Magistrate Judge Jolson Issued a report and recommendation

("R&R") recommending that this attempted removal be dismissed. EOF No. 4.

Magistrate Judge Jolson notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Id. at 2. She also specifically advised the parties that

the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right

to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District

Court adopting the R&R. Id.

The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.

Defendant did file a 'Yormal request for a certified copy of the 'Certified Delegation of

Authority Order,'" but this document has no legal basis and does not provide any articulable

objection to the R&R. ECF No. 5. Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED.

This case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

JASON GLEN,

Petitioner,

vs.

WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cv-496

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. 

Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 7)

AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the 

Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on May 11, 2020,

submitted a Report and Recommendation, recommending that Petitioner’s petition for a 

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied with prejudice. (Doc. 7).

On May 26, 2020, Petitioner moved the Court for a 30-day extension of time to 

file objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 8). On May 27, 2020 the 

Court granted Petitioner’s motion and extended the deadline by which Petitioner was 

required to file objections to June 25, 2020. (Not. Order, May 27, 2020).

On June 25, 2020, Petitioner moved the Court for another 30-day extension of 

time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 9). On June 26, 2020, 

Case: 1:18-cv-00496-TSB-SKB Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/16/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 834
2

the Court granted Petitioner’s motion and extended the deadline by which Petitioner was 

required to file objections to July 27, 2020. (Not. Order, June 26, 2020).

Now, the July 27, 2020 deadline has come and gone. And Petitioner has not filed 

any objections. As such, the Report and Recommendation stands unopposed.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 

of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds that the 

Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED in its entirety;

2. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (Doc. 1) is DENIED with prejudice;

3. Because reasonable jurists would not debate the Court’s conclusions, the

Court DENIES issuance of a certificate of appealability, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2253; see Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (citing

Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 & n.4 (1983));

4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that an appeal

of this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, this Court

DENIES Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis; and

5. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is

TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

10/16/2020 s/Timothy S. Black

Case: 1:18-cv-00496-TSB-SKB Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/16/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 835
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION, DAYTON

ALA NOFAN MAKHAMREH, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.

William P. Barr, Attorney General of the
United States of America, United States
Department of Justice, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:18-CV-00227

District Judge Walter H. Rice

(Proposed) Order granting Motion to
Seal the U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services’ Certified
Administrative Record (“CAR”)

Upon Motion of the Parties and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED:

That the CAR be SEALED pending further Order of this Court.

Ordered this Zo Ww day of November, 2019.

Udew\ ws

WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

6/28/2019

 Southern District of Ohio

Jerald Overley

3:18-cv-163

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full; Commissioner's non-disability determination is

REVERSED; matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence

of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

✔ Walter H. Rice

Report and Recommendation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, January 26, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

                        The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# STATUS: 

                        The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to Form PF to require current reporting and amend reporting requirements.

2. The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to the definition of an exchange under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and re-propose amendments to Regulation ATS for ATSs That Trade U.S. Government Securities, NMS Stock, and Other Securities and to Regulation SCI for ATSs That Trade U.S. Government Securities.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        For further information and to ascertain                               ( print page 3376)                            what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.                    

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

 Dated: January 19, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-01315 Filed 1-19-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 1 of 20  PAGEID #: 116

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 2 of 20  PAGEID #: 117

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 3 of 20  PAGEID #: 118

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 4 of 20  PAGEID #: 119

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 5 of 20  PAGEID #: 120

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 6 of 20  PAGEID #: 121

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 7 of 20  PAGEID #: 122

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 8 of 20  PAGEID #: 123

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 9 of 20  PAGEID #: 124

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 10 of 20  PAGEID #: 125

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 11 of 20  PAGEID #: 126

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 12 of 20  PAGEID #: 127

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 13 of 20  PAGEID #: 128

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 14 of 20  PAGEID #: 129

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 15 of 20  PAGEID #: 130

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 16 of 20  PAGEID #: 131

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 17 of 20  PAGEID #: 132

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 18 of 20  PAGEID #: 133

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 19 of 20  PAGEID #: 134

Case: 2:18-cr-00152-EAS Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/27/18 Page: 20 of 20  PAGEID #: 135
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC17-942

____________

ROBERT JOE LONG, 

Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

[January 29, 2018]

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Robert Joe Long’s appeal of the circuit court’s order 

denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. 

This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. 

Long’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s 

decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in 

Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161 

(2017). This Court stayed Long’s appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. 

State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017). After this 
- 2 -

Court decided Hitchcock, Long responded to this Court’s order to show cause 

arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Long’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the 

State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Long is not entitled to relief. Long

was sentenced to death following a jury’s unanimous recommendation for death. 

Long v. State, 610 So. 2d 1268, 1269 (Fla. 1992). His sentence of death became 

final in 1993. Long v. Florida, 510 U.S. 832 (1993). Thus, Hurst does not apply 

retroactively to Long’s sentence of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217. 

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Long’s motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Long, we 

caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so 

ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

QUINCE, J., recused.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock 

v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now 

final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting 

opinion in Hitchcock.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Hillsborough County, 
- 3 -

Michelle Sisco, Judge - Case No. 291984CF013346000AHC

Robert Anthony Norgard of Norgard, Norgard & Chastang, P.A., Bartow, Florida,

for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Stephen D. Ake, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tampa, Florida,

for Appellee
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
June 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-20378 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EVENCIO RUBIO-RUBIO,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-170-ALL

--------------------
Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *

Evencio Rubio-Rubio appeals his sentence following his guiltyplea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, a violation

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rubio-Rubio argues that the district court

erred by imposing his sentence under the mandatory guidelines

scheme held unconstitutional in United States v. Booker
, 125 S. Ct.

738 (20 05). Because Rubio-Rubio did not raise this issue in the

district court, review is limited to plain error. S ee United

States v. Vonn , 535 U.S. 55, 59 (2002). The district court erredNo. 04-20378 -2-

in imposing Rubio’s sentence under the mandatory Guidelines scheme,

and thi s error was obvious after B ooker

. S ee United States v.

Valenzuela-Quevedo
,

__ F.3d __, No. 03-41754, 2005 WL 941353 at *4

(5th Cir. Apr. 25, 2005). However, Rubio-Rubio has not shown that

the error affected his substantial rights as he has not shown that

the record shows the district court judge would have imposed a

different or lesser sentence under a Booker advisory regime. See

id. at **4-5. Therefore, he has not met the requirements to show

plain error.

AFFIRMED.
221 - 1

(Adopted January 4, 1985)

RULE 221. PLANS

(a) A person shall not conduct any operation for which these rules and regulations

require a plan without first obtaining approval of such plan by the Executive

Officer within the time interval expressed in said rules and regulations.

(b) The operation shall not be conducted contrary to any conditions specified in the

approved plan.

(c) All plans shall be submitted in a form and manner as specified by the Executive

Officer.

(d) A violation of the plan is a violation of the rule.

(e) A plan shall have all the rights delineated in Regulation II for permits including the 

right of appeal.
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.2




CA, Inc. Change in Control Severance Policy 
(Amended and Restated as of August 5, 2015)


(Schedule as of August 5, 2015)


Schedule A
(2.99 Multiple)


Chief Executive Officer (Michael P. Gregoire)
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Richard J. Beckert)
Executive Vice President and Group Executive, Worldwide Sales and Services (Adam Elster)
Executive Vice President and Chief Products Officer (Ayman Sayed)


[Employees may be added or eliminated from time to time]


Schedule B
(2.00 Multiple)


Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer (Lauren P. Flaherty)
Executive Vice President and General Counsel (Michael C. Bisignano)
[Employees may be added or eliminated from time to time]


Schedule C
(1.00 Multiple)


Executive Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development (Jacob Lamm)  
Executive Vice President, Global Operations and Information Systems (Paul L. Pronsati)


[Employees may be added or eliminated from time to time]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers’ Fringe Benefit 

Programs,

:

:

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : Case No. 2:17-CV-217

:

RL Williams Concrete, LLC :

:

Judge Smith

: Magistrate Judge Kemp

Defendant. :

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO ACCELERATE AND COMPEL DISCOVERY

This cause came on to be heard upon Plaintiffs’ Motion to Accelerate and Compel Discovery. It appearing 

to the Court that Defendant has failed to answer or otherwise appear in this action, and default having been entered, 

and it further appearing that the Complaint seeks to compel an audit of Defendant’s payroll records and that 

production of the records and the testimony of its officer is necessary to complete the audit and to permit Plaintiffs 

to seek any ultimate relief by way of a money judgment that may be appropriate, and it further appearing that cause 

exists to accelerate the commencement of discovery pursuant to Civil Rule 26, and to compel the Defendant to 

respond, it is hereby 

ORDERED that Defendant RL Williams Concrete, LLC through an authorized officer, 

is ordered to appear for deposition on the 10th day of May, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. and to produce the payroll documents 

requested in Plaintiffs’ Notice of Deposition.

_________________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Approved: 

/s/ Steven L. Ball 

Steven L. Ball (0007186) 

Ball & Tanoury 

1010 Old Henderson Road – Suite 1 

Columbus, OH 43220

(614) 447-8550

Trial Attorney for Plaintiffs

T5FSFODF1,FNQ
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 774 

Honoring the United Nations World Food Programme on the occasion of 

being awarded the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2020 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. CASEY, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. 

MORAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the United Nations World Food Programme on 

the occasion of being awarded the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize. 

Whereas, on October 9, 2020, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2020 

has been awarded to the United Nations World Food 

Programme (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘WFP’’) 

‘‘for its efforts to combat hunger, for its contribution to 

bettering conditions for peace in conflict-affected areas 

and for acting as a driving force in efforts to prevent the 

use of hunger as a weapon of war and conflict’’; 

Whereas the WFP is the largest humanitarian organization 

in the world that addresses hunger and promotes food security; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 774 IS 

Whereas, in 2019, 135,000,000 people around the world suffered from acute hunger and the WFP provided nutrition 

assistance to nearly 100,000,000 people in 88 countries; 

Whereas the 2020 coronavirus pandemic has contributed to 

a significant increase in the number of victims of hunger 

around the world, and the WFP has surged capacity in 

order to meet that compounded need; 

Whereas the United States makes available more than 40 

percent of the annual resources for the WFP; 

Whereas the WFP has stated, ‘‘Until the day we have a medical vaccine, food is the best vaccine against chaos’’; and 

Whereas the Norwegian Nobel Committee, in announcing the 

winner of the Nobel Peace Price for 2020, stated, ‘‘The 

work of the World Food Programme to the benefit of humankind is an endeavour that all the nations of the world 

should be able to endorse and support’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) joins the other countries of the world in— 

3 (A) affirming the mission of the United 

4 Nations World Food Programme (referred to in 

5 this resolution as the ‘‘WFP’’) on the occasion 

6 of being awarded the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize; 

7 and 

8 (B) supporting the leadership of the WFP 

9 Executive Director, David Beasley, and the con10 tributions of the more than 17,000 WFP staff 

11 worldwide; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 774 IS 

1 (2) remains committed to the goal of the inter2 national community to end hunger, achieve food se3 curity, and improve nutrition through the work of 

4 the WFP. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(cX2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Southern District of Ohio

United States of America

V.

James Robert Dakin, Jr

Date of Original Judgment:

Date of Previous Amended Judgment:

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)

06/22/2018

USMNo: 47611-008

Laura E. Byrum

Defendant 's Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of I/] the defendant |J the Director of the Bureau of Prisons |_j the court under 18 U. S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made reti-oactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U. S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B 1. 10

and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

FT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

DDENIED. 171 GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in

the last judgment issued) of 67 months is reduced to Time-served

(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 -when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions e judgment t

IT IS SO ORDERED.

06/22/2018 shal remain in effect.

Order Date: I ^ ^^

Effective Date: 02/01/2024

(if different from order date)

Judge 's signature

Thomas M.Rose, District Judge

Printed name and title

Case: 3:18-cr-00006-TMR Doc #: 44 Filed: 01/10/24 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 191