alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 1997 (unaudited) and the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1997
(unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           1,941
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                    2,625
<ALLOWANCES>                       461
<INVENTORY>                      3,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 9,341
<PP&E>                           1,387
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  22,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,685
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                            61
<OTHER-SE>                      21,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    22,775
<SALES>                          6,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 6,851
<CGS>                            3,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    3,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 (23)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     77
<INCOME-TAX>                       154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (77)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                       (77)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (.01)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Scott D. Dalesandro, )

et al., )

) 

Plaintiffs, ) Case No. C-1-01-109

)

vs. )

)

International Paper )

Company, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

This is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for

Court approval of class communiction (Doc. No. 56). The Court

approves the attached notice for distribution to the class

members.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Date November 17, 2003 s/Sandra S. Beckwith 

 Sandra S. Beckwith 

 United States District Judge

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 58 Filed 11/17/2003 Page 1 of 2
November__, 2003

To: All Class Members in

 Dalesandro, et al., v. International Paper Company,

 Case No. C-1-01-109

 United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

This letter is being sent to you to inform you of the status of a dispute which arose from

responses to the Court Ordered Notice dated September 24, 2003.

The dispute concerns whether you are entitled to vacation pay as a part of your severance

benefits under Section 7.1 of the 828 Severance Policy. Section 7.1 states:

An Eligible Employee will receive a lump sum payment for banked vacation, earned but 

 unused vacation, and if eligible to retire (under the provisions of Section 3 or otherwise), 

 accrued vacation.

It is our position, as your class counsel, that vacation pay under Section 7.1 is one of the benefits

sought to be recovered in this lawsuit. International Paper Company disagrees and contends that

you received your benefits under Section 7.1 from Smart Paper after February 9, 2001 under the

terms of the asset purchase agreement between International Paper and Smart Paper. 

International Paper also takes the position that this claim for benefits has not been properly

raised in this lawsuit and, therefore, is not properly a part of this lawsuit.

The parties have brought this dispute to the Court’s attention and Judge Beckwith has set

out the procedure by which she will consider each position and decide this issue. Counsel and

the Court are making every effort to obtain a ruling on this dispute as soon as possible. We hope

to inform you of the result in the next few months.

Sincerely,

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 58 Filed 11/17/2003 Page 2 of 2
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



# Document

Number: 

# 143 ) ll-E-103 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/20088:42:08AM Sheet 143 of 264_E2 _ 

## •A-94- 5 7

- 

# Il-Evlo? ; To : Subject : Dat e sen t Madeleine , MADELEIN E STRU M <STRUM.MADELEINE@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV>

Jone s & Hun t Teleco n Thu , 2 8 Au g 199712:18:2 2
I contacte d th e phon e numbe r(717 ) 366-103 5 tha t wa s liste d i n th e 199 3 surve yfo rJone s & Hun t Th e phon e numbe rwa s a numbe rfo ra distributio n cente rt o whic h phon e call s fo rJone s & Hun t wer e forwarded . I wa s informe d tha t Jone s & Hun t burn t dow n abou t thre e years ago . Melani e
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 16, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00029

- CV

AUTOBUSES ZAVALA PLUS

,

Appellant

v.

Maria Torres MARTINEZ

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CI02517

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant ’ s second agreed motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to August 13, 2018.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### Stayton v. Halpern.

Homestead : Bight of *minor*child.

Under the constitution of 1874 the fee to the real estate of a decedent cannot he sold by order of the probate court for the payment of his debts, subject to the homestead right of his minor child. *McQloyv.*Arnett, 47 *Ark*,*445.

APPEAL from *Monroe*Circuit Court.

M. T. Sanders, Judge.

*John C. Palmer, for*appellant.

A sale by an administrator, to pay the debts of the intestate, of the homestead, while it was occupied as a homestead by the minor heirs, conveys no title. The sale is void. 31 *Ark,*140; 41 *Id.,*97; 40 *Id.,*74; 43 *Id.,*434; 45 *Id.,*384,- 47 *Id.,*445; *Thomp. Homest. & Ex.,*secs.78, 40, 165, 170-3; *Const. Ark.*1874, *art. IX, sec.*10.

J. *N. Cypert,*for appellee.

The sale was valid. The homestead right of the widow and minor under *Const.*1874 is analogous to dower. It is only the use during life of widow and minority of children. They do not own the *fee.*The probate court has power under seo, 171, *Mansf. Dig., to order the sale.*

The *Const,*of 1868 was very different from that of 1874. See *Const.*1868, *seo.*5, *art.*14, which exempts the homestead from payment of debts *in all*eases during minority of the children, &c. There is no such provision in the *Const, of*1874. The case in 47 *Ark,*445; does not apply. The inheritance cast upon an heir can be sold for his own debts, and the same right would be liable for the debts' of his ancestor.

*330Cockrill, C. J.

The question arose upon demurrer to the answer of the appellee, who was sued by the appellants in ejectment, and is thus stated by the appellee’s counsel:

> “ Can the fee to real estate be sold by order of the probate court, upon the petition of an administrator, for the payment of the debts of his intestate, subject to the homestead right of a minor child, under the constitution of 1874 ?”

*McCloy v. Arnett,*47 *Ark.,*445, where the subject is fully treated, answers a similar question, which arose under the homestead provisions of the constitution of 1868, in the negative. The policy of exempting the homestead from sale after the death of the debtor for the benefit of the widow and the minor children, was continued by the constitution of 1874 without abating the right as it existed under the constitution of 1868 and the act of 1852. *Garibaldi v. Jones,*48 *Ark.,*236; *Art*9, *sec.*6, *Const.*1874. The case of *MeCloy v. Arnett,*therefore, controls this. See too *Nichols v. Shearon,*49 *Id., 75.*

Reverse the judgment and remand the cause, with instructions to sustain the demurrer.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

SCOTT D. DALESANDRO and DIANNE :

NOONAN, on behalf of themselves and :

the certified Class, : Case No. 1:01cv-109

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : Judge Sandra S. Beckwith

:

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, :

:

Defendant :

ORDER 

For good cause shown, the Court grants the parties Joint Motion To Extend Date

For Final Distribution and Accounting and hereby orders that a final distribution to the

class and an accounting to the Court will be made by Defendant on or before February

28, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: February 14, 2006 s/Sandra S. Beckwith 

Sandra S. Beckwith, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 114 Filed 02/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                         PHYCOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

             Statement regarding computation of per share earnings

         Three months and nine months ended September 30, 1996 and 1995

                 (In thousands, except for earnings per share)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             SIX MONTHS ENDED                 NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                               SEPTEMBER 30,                     SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                           ---------------------             ---------------------
                                                           1996             1995             1996             1995
                                                           ----             ----             ----             ----
<S>                                                      <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>
Earnings per common share:
   Net income                                            $ 9,073            6,115           25,182            14,908
                                                         =======           ======           ======            ======

   Earnings per share                                       $.15              .11              .42               .29
                                                         =======           ======           ======            ======

   Weighted average common
      shares outstanding                                  60,843           58,172           60,555            51,786
                                                         =======           ======           ======            ======

Earnings per common share, assuming full dilution:

   Net income                                            $ 9,073            6,115           25,182            14,908
                                                         =======           ======           ======            ======

   Earnings per share                                       $.15              .11              .42               .29
                                                         =======           ======           ======            ======

   Weighted average commonshares outstanding              67,380           58,886           66,325            52,959
                                                         =======           ======           ======            ======
</TABLE>


Note:    The convertible debentures were not included in the calculation of the
         fully diluted earnings per share since the effect of inclusion would
         be antidilutive.
EX-10(XXI)







Exhibit xxi




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION

2002 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




     This First Amendment to the Camco Financial Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”) is
effective as of this 30th day of December, 2008.



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, Camco Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), previously
adopted the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Company may amend the Plan from time to time without the consent of Participants
(as defined in the Plan); and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan for the purpose of complying with Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code.



AMENDMENT




     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:




	1.	 	Section 1.8(iii) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the
following






(iii) If the Common Shares are not actively traded on an national securities
exchange or quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market, the Fair Market Value of an Incentive
Stock Option shall be as determined by the Committee.




	2.	 	New Section 1.8(iv) is hereby added to the Plan as follows:






(iv) If the Common Shares are not readily tradable on an established securities
exchange (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code), the Fair Market Value of
a Nonqualified Stock Option shall be determined by the Committee, through the
reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method, taking into account all
information material to the value of the Company, that satisfies the requirements of
Section 409A of the Code.




	3.	 	Article XII of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end
thereof:
	 
	 	 	Any adjustment pursuant to this Article XII shall be made in accordance with the
requirements of Section 409A of the Code, to the extent applicable.





[signature page attached]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized officer effective as of the date first set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Its:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 







-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

JEFFREY BLEVINS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Civil Action 2:18-cv-364

Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

Magistrate Judge Jolson

CAPITAL ALLIANCE GROUP,

Defendant.

ORDER

The docket reflects that the Complaint has been served upon Defendant, that the time for 

filing an answer has passed, and that Plaintiff has not moved for the entry of default. Local Rule 

of Court 55.1 provides as follows:

55.1 DEFAULTS and DEFAULT JUDGMENTS

(a) If a party makes proper service of a pleading seeking affirmative relief but, 

after the time for making a response has passed without any response having been 

served and filed, that party does not request the Clerk to enter a default, the Court 

may by written order direct the party to show cause why the claims in that 

pleading should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

(b) If a party obtains a default but does not, within a reasonable time thereafter, 

either file a motion for a default judgment or request a hearing or trial on the issue 

of damages, the Court may by written order direct the party to show cause why 

the claims upon which default was entered should not be dismissed for failure to 

prosecute.

(c) Nothing in this Rule shall be construed to limit the Court’s power, either under 

Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 or otherwise, to dismiss a case or one or more claims or parties 

for failure to prosecute.

Case: 2:18-cv-00364-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/18/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 24
Pursuant to that Rule, Plaintiff is directed to show cause within 14 days from the date of this 

Order why this action should not be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: June 18, 2018 /s/ Kimberly A. Jolson

KIMBERLY A. JOLSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case: 2:18-cv-00364-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/18/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 25
Exhibit 10.21


 


FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

LETTER AGREEMENT


 


First Amendment (“Amendment”) made as of December 31,
2008 to the Letter Agreement (“Letter Agreement”) dated as of February 5,
2008, by and between NeuroMetrix, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its
principal executive office in Waltham, Massachusetts (the “Company”),
and Michael Williams, Ph.D. (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Letter
Agreement to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire that this Amendment
be deemed a modification and an amendment to the Letter Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
covenants contained herein, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:


 


1.                                       The
paragraph titled “Severance” of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended by
appending the following to the end of such paragraph:


 


“Payments of continuation of Base Salary owed
pursuant to this paragraph will occur on the regular payroll payment dates for
the Company beginning with the first regular payroll payment date that occurs
on or after the date that is 45 days after your termination or resignation (with the first payment to include the full
amount owed for continuation of Base Salary for the payroll period to which
such payment date relates and any prior payroll periods for which payment was
not yet made).”


 


2.                                       All
other provisions of the Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
according to their respective terms, and nothing contained herein shall be
deemed a waiver of any right or abrogation of any obligation otherwise existing
under the Letter Agreement except to the extent specifically provided for
herein.


 


[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed
as a sealed instrument by the Company and by the Executive as of the date first
above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  NEUROMETRIX, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Shai N. Gozani

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Shai N. Gozani

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:   President and CEO

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Michael Williams, Ph.D.

  
	
   

  	
  Michael Williams, Ph.D.

  



 


2
steam_record - Fwd: Fw: RE: Arizona Public Service's Cholla Power Plant ELG ICR 

(0113) 

 

>>> Deborah Bartram 8/27/2010 9:11 AM >>> 

Helpline - please save this email in the Extension Requests folder and forward to the steam_record email box. 

>>> steamhelp 8/27/2010 9:10 AM >>> 

FYI 

>>> <Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov> 8/26/2010 10:03 PM >>> 

-----Forwarded by Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US on 08/26/2010 10:03PM ----- 

To: Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: Carl.Woolfolk@aps.com 

Date: 08/26/2010 07:41PM 

cc: Douglas.Lavarnway@aps.com, Ken.Miller@pinnaclewest.com, Susan.VonStein@aps.com 

Subject: RE: Arizona Public Service's Cholla Power Plant ELG ICR (0113) 

Dear Mr. Jordan:

 

My name is Carl Woolfolk, I am the Fossil Environmental Operations Regulatory Manager at 

Arizona Public Service Company (APS). I left you a voicemail last night and this morning 

regarding one of our coal plant’s response to the ELG ICR. 

 

In particular, on August 9, the Cholla Power Plant’s #2 generation unit suffered an 

equipment failure which shut down the unit. The Cholla plant is a baseload generation unit, 

which APS relies on to provide power to metropolitan Phoenix. At this time of year in the 

desert, all our baseload generation units across the company are at or near capacity, and 

the loss of the unit at the Cholla plant has required APS to redirect all of its engineering 

efforts away from completing the ICR and focused on restoring the unit and bringing it back 

on line. But for this emergency situation, APS would have been able to meet the original 

deadline. 

 

Therefore, the Cholla Power Plant is requesting a 30 day extension to respond to the ICR. 

Please email me or call me if you have any questions or concerns. APS greatly appreciates 

EPA consider its emergency request. 

 

Sincerely

Carl D. Woolfolk

Regulatory Manager

From: steamhelp

To: steam_record@ERG.COM

Date: 8/27/2010 9:12 AM

Subject: Fwd: Fw: RE: Arizona Public Service's Cholla Power Plant ELG ICR (0113)

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C778184DO... 8/26/2011
APS Fossil Environmental Operations

606/250‐5385

 

 

Email Firewall made the following annotations 

--------------------------------------------------------------------- 

--- NOTICE --- 

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain confidential, privileged or 

proprietary information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately 

and delete the original and any copy or printout. Unintended recipients are prohibited from 

making any other use of this e-mail. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure 

no viruses are present in this e-mail, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from 

the use of this e-mail or attachments, or for any delay or errors or omissions in the contents 

which result from e-mail transmission. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C778184DO... 8/26/2011
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01394]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-01-2022]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 38--Spartanburg County, South Carolina; 
Notification of Proposed Production Activity, BMW Manufacturing 
Company, LLC (Passenger Motor Vehicles), Spartanburg, South Carolina

    BMW Manufacturing Company, LLC submitted a notification of proposed 
production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facility in 
Spartanburg, South Carolina within Subzone 38A. The notification 
conforming to the requirements of the Board's regulations (15 CFR 
400.22) was received on January 13, 2022.
    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be 
limited to the specific foreign-status component described in the 
submitted notification (summarized below) and subsequently authorized 
by the Board. The benefits that may stem from conducting production 
activity under FTZ procedures are explained in the background section 
of the Board's website--accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. The proposed 
component would be added to the production authority that the Board 
previously approved for the operation, as reflected on the Board's 
website.
    The proposed foreign-status component is plastic terminal battery 
caps (duty-free). The request indicates that the component is subject 
to duties under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (section 301), 
depending on the country of origin. The applicable Section 301 
decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in 
privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a1c0e003a0e081b1e1f541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="781e0c02380c0a191c1d561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is March 7, 2022.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information System'' section of the Board's 
website.
    For further information, contact Christopher Wedderburn at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3a08b918a90cdb486878786918196918da39791828786cd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="17547f657e64394072737372657562657957636576737239707861">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 20, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01394 Filed 1-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>