alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J:\MAURYDH\01-111.doc 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

CYNTHIA K. PAYNE,

Plaintiff,

vs. 

GLAXOSMITHKLINE,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Cause No. 1:01cv111

Judge Herman J. Weber

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING

MEMORANDA RELATING TO

ATTORNEYS' FEES 

Upon application of both parties and for good cause shown, 

IT IS ORDERED that the parties have an additional one week, to September 23, 2003,

for filing each party's memorandum relating to the other's filing for attorneys' fees, as follows:

1.Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and

Costs;

2.Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Partial Attorneys'

Fees. 

___________S/ Herman J. Weber_____

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 118 Filed 09/15/2003 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT  21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                           --------------------------

                  P.A.M. Transport, Inc. (Arkansas Corporation)

              P.A.M. Special Services, Inc. (Arkansas Corporation)

               P.A.M. Dedicated Services, Inc. (Ohio Corporation)

             P.A.M. Logistics Services, Inc. (Arkansas Corporation)

                        T.T.X., Inc. (Texas Corporation)

                  Choctaw Express, Inc. (Oklahoma Corporation)

                 Choctaw Brokerage, Inc. (Oklahoma Corporation)

               Allen Freight Services, Inc. (Missouri Corporation)

                  Decker Transport Co., Inc. (Ohio Corporation)
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/23/2010 09:35 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |"Higgins,Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |06/30/2010 10:18 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |slides for RICE NESHAP briefing | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Cortney, Attached are the slides for the briefing tomorrow.

Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov(See attached file: SI RICE NESHAP OMB briefing 7-1-10.ppt)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999,
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       9,474,963
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  752,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      21,507,385
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,908,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,313,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,226,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,313,532
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,134,377
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,251,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,130,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,130,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,130,327
<EPS-BASIC>                                     193.56<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   193.56<F2>
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
<F2>EPS IS NET INCOME PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

TINA BRICKLES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VILLAGE OF PHILLIPSBURG, OHIO, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:18-CV-00193

Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

ORDER MODIFYING DEADLINES 

IN PRELMINARY PRETRIAL 

CONFERENCE ORDER

___________________________________________

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Deadlines for Expert Designations and Discovery Cut-Off Date (Doc. 33). Defendants Village 

of Phillipsburg, Ohio and Mark Wysong consent to the proposed modifications to the 

Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order. The Motion is well-taken and is therefore GRANTED. 

The deadlines in the Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order (Doc. 18) for the following items 

(only) are hereby amended as follows:

Plaintiffs' Primary Expert Designations: December 1, 2019

Defendants' Primary Expert Designations: January 8, 2020

Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Rebuttal Expert Designations: February 1, 2020

Discovery cut-off: March 28, 2020

Cut-off date for filing summary judgment motions: May 1, 2020

IT IS SO ORDERED:

s/ Thomas M. Rose

_______________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

Ryan Smith, Speaker of the Ohio House of 

Representatives, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB

Judge Timothy S. Black

Judge Karen Nelson Moore

Judge Michael H. Watson

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

PROPOSED INTERVENORS REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION, 

OHIO VOTERS, AND REPUBLICAN PARTY ORGANIZATIONS’ RESPONSE TO

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY 

Plaintiffs submit, as supplemental authority, an order of the three-judge court in League of 

Women Voters of Michigan v. Johnson, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Case 

No. 2:17-cv-14148, denying leave to intervene to two members of Michigan’s state legislature to 

defend the state’s legislative districts in that case. The Johnson court’s opinion was grounded 

chiefly in concerns about the separation of powers under Michigan state law as to the propriety of 

executive-branch and legislative-branch officials each defending Michigan legislation in the 

courts. None of the Intervenor Applicants are members of the Ohio General Assembly, and Ohio’s 

legislative districting plan is not challenged in this case.

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 62 Filed: 08/15/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 671
2

Dated: August 15, 2018 Respectfully submitted,

BAKERHOSTETLER LLP

/s/ Patrick T. Lewis

Patrick T. Lewis (0078314)

Trial Attorney

Email: plewis@bakerlaw.com

127 Public Square, Suite 2000

Cleveland, OH 44114-1214

(216) 621-0200 / Fax (216) 696-0740 

Robert J. Tucker (0082205)

Email: rtucker@bakerlaw.com

200 Civic Center Drive, Suite 1200

Columbus, OH 43215-4138

(614) 228-1541 / Fax (614) 462-2616

Katherine L. McKnight(*)

Email: kmcknight@bakerlaw.com

Richard B. Raile(*)

Email: rraile@bakerlaw.com

Washington Square, Suite 1100

1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036-5403

(202) 861-1500 / Fax (202) 861-1783

(*) pro hac vice motions pending

Counsel for Intervenor Applicants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 15, 2018, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed 

via the Court’s CM/ECF system and served via electronic filing upon all counsel of record in this 

case. 

/s/ Patrick T. Lewis

Patrick T. Lewis (0078314)

Counsel for Intervenor Applicants

013253.000001 4837-0072-6896

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 62 Filed: 08/15/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 672
**EXHIBIT23.02****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(Nos. 333-62724, 333-67424 and 333-105497) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-88543, 333-95713, 333-35738,333-44768, 333-61218, 333-63900, 333-67730, 333-86324, 333-102771, 333-105498, 333-113856 and333-123377) of Silicon Image, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2005 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPSan Jose, California
R eco rd o f D i sc u ss io n D oc k e t No. FAA- Directo rate Id e n t ifi e r: -AD



### With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer,

**ATA ~**  

### NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

O R G A N I ZATIO N PERSON C O N T ACTED D A TE TO PI CS DI SCUSSE D 

### Boe i ng Mr. D o u g la s M . 06/ 30 /20 14 No response. 

### L ane A 4A Mr. Robert Ireland 07/2 8/ 2014 N o res pon s e .

Other/Additional inf o rm a ti o n :
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Daniel L. Hellmuth, 

Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 1:18cv397 

v. Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Leanne Hood, et al., 

Defendants. 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

[ ] JURY VERDICT: This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. 

The issues have been tried and the Jury has rendered its verdict. 

[ X] DECISION BY COURT: This action came to trial or hearing before the 

Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been 

rendered. 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Report and Recommendation and 

Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Docs. 16, 47) are adopted; defendants’ 

Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 18, 20) are GRANTED. 

Date: February 26, 2019 Richard W. Nagel, Clerk 

Clerk 

By: S/Barbara A. Crum 

 Deputy Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
Melissa Gilvin, et al.,
: Case No. 1:18-cv-107
Plaintiffs,
Judge Susan J. Dlott
v.
: Order Denying Motion for

FCA US, LLC, et al., : Leave to Amend

Defendants.

This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman for all pretrial and
post-judgment motions and procedures, whether dispositive or not, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 32), the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 56) recommending denial of the Motion
for Leave to Amend, and Plaintiffs’ Objections to the R&R (Doc. 60). Plaintiffs seek leave to
file their proposed Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 32-2). For the reasons that follow, the
Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and deny Plaintiffs leave to amend.

I.

Magistrate judges are authorized to decide dispositive and non-dispositive matters
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If a party
timely files objections to a magistrate judge’s decision on a nondispositive matter, the district
judge must “modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to
law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The clearly erroneous standard applies to a magistrate judge’s
findings of fact and the contrary to law standard to her conclusions of law. See Gandee v.
Glaser, 785 F. Supp. 684, 686 (S.D. Ohio 1992), aff'd, No. 92-3304, 1994 WL 83265 (6th Cir.

Mar. 14, 1994). The district judge must conduct a de novo review of a magistrate judge’s


recommendation on a dispositive motion. Baker v. Peterson, 67 F. App’x 308, 310 (6th Cir.

2003). The Sixth Circuit has not determined whether motions to amend are dispositive or non-

dispositive, but several district courts have treated the motions as non-dispositive. See, e.g.,

Crangle v. Eppinger, No. 5:13 cv 842, 2018 WL 1621247, at *1 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 4, 2018); FH.

v. Shelby Cty. Schs., No. 2:12-cv-02312, 2016 WL 10637101, at * 1 (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 30, 2016);

Rogers v. AK Steel Corp., No. C-1-96-987, 1998 WL 1753590, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 1998).
IL.

The Court has reviewed the R&R, examined the parties’ briefs, and analyzed the legal
arguments therein. Even under a de novo review, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge
Bowman that leave to file the proposed Second Amended Complaint should be denied. Plaintiffs
have moved to amend in an untimely and prejudicial fashion given the specific procedural
history of this case. Moreover, Plaintiffs’ new and amended claims are futile as written.
Accordingly, the Motion for Leave to Amend is DENIED, the Report and Recommendation is

ADOPTED, and the Plaintiffs’ Objections are OVERRULED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
uw
Dated this 6K day of Novyembirs , 2019.
BY THE COURT:
Susan J. Dlott

United States Lo Judge

i
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5


                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                             1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                                       OF
                        NEW PLAN EXCEL REALTY TRUST, INC.
                       (AMENDED AND RESTATED MAY 28, 1998)

                             Dated: February 8, 1999

        WHEREAS, New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. ("Company") previously
adopted the 1993 Stock Option Plan of New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.
("Plan"); and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the Stock Option Committee of the Board
of Directors of the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan; and

        WHEREAS, the Executive Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company serves as the Stock Option Committee for the
Plan ("Committee"); and

        WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan.

        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective September 28, 1998
as follows:

        1.      The third sentence of Section 2.1 - Shares Subject to Plan is
deleted in its entirety, and the following is substituted therefor:

                "For the fiscal year ending December 31, 1998 and through the
        termination of the Plan, in no event, except as subject to adjustment as
        provided in Section 2.2 (to the extent permitted by Section 422 of the
        Code), shall the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock which
        cumulatively may be available for issuance upon exercise of Incentive
        Stock Options granted during the period January 1, 1998 through the
        termination of the Plan exceed 1,700,000 plus, to the extent such
        addition does not jeopardize the treatment of Incentive Stock Options as
        incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code, the number of
        shares of Common Stock relating to Incentive Stock Options granted under
        the Plan which have expired or have been cancelled without having been
        exercised."

        2.      In all other respects the Plan, as amended, shall continue in
full force and effect.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-484-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming Negotiated Rate 
Agreement Filing-Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC to be effective 2/1/
2022.
    Filed Date: 1/13/22.
    Accession Number: 20220113-5136.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/20/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 14, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01171 Filed 1-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00030

- CR

ANDRES ALVAREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 41,518

- A

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Andres Alvarez , appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss h is appeal. The motion wa s

signed by both Alvarez a nd h is counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2 (a), we grant the

motion.

Acc ordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: June 2, 2014

Date Decided: June 3, 2014

Do Not Publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTOINE WARD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 269 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
WCMS Last updated on Monday, September 09, 2013 http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/ind-c alculator.html 

## Climate Change 

# Household Carbon Footprint Calculator You can use the following online calculator to get a ro ugh “ballpark” estimate of your personal or family’s greenhouse gas emissions and explore the impact of taking var ious actions to reduce your emissions. The calculator is broken into three sections: Section 1: Estimate your current total household emissions. Section 2: Explore actions you can take to reduce your greenhouse gas e missions, energy use, and waste disposal costs. Section 3: See how much you can save (in dollars and emissions) by takin g the actions you chose in Section 2. To get the most accurate results, gather your recent electr ic, gas, and/or oil bills so you can use real numbers for yo ur household’s energy consumption. Remember that your energy bills vary by season, so use an average of winter and summer values if you can. 1. Allow yourself 10-15 minutes to enter the data. 2. After entering data, use the TAB key to continue moving through each section of the calculator. When you get to t he end of a section, click “Next Section” to move on. 3. Visit the What You Can Do section of the climate change we bsite to learn about other actions you can take to redu ce your greenhouse gas emissions. 4. 

# Page 1 of 1 Calculator | Climate Change | US EPA

6/3/2014 http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/ind

- calculator.html
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   5-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      13,951,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,700,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               51,679,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              (11,636,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                   2,825,469,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (158,021,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,894,546,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                  1,077,920,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    913,000
<COMMON>                                       884,000
<OTHER-SE>                               1,694,661,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,894,546,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           155,921,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               99,693,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               457,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,825,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          27,168,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             55,805,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                55,805,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>