alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the                           ( print page 2881)                        provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Clinical Trials Review Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         March 3-4, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keary A. Cope, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 209-A, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 827-7912,                         *copeka@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2022.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-00901 Filed 1-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.1






FORM OF AMENDMENT TO
SENIOR MANAGEMENT SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


This amendment to the Senior Management Severance and Change in Control Agreement dated April 1, 2014 between The Mosaic Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and ______________________ (“Employee”) is effective as of the date indicated below by Employee’s signature. 


The Company and Employee hereby agree that clauses Sections 4(a) and 4(b) of the Agreement are hereby amended and restated, in their entirety, as follows:


		
	“(a)
	Severance.


		
	(i)
	Employee shall be eligible to receive an amount equal to one and one-half times Employee’s annual base salary in effect as of the date of termination.


		
	(ii)
	If Employee’s termination is a Qualified CIC Termination, Employee shall be eligible to receive an amount equal to an additional _____ times Employee’s annual base salary in effect as of the date of termination. 


		
	(b)
	Additional Payout.


(i)    Employee shall be eligible to receive a payout equal to one and one-half times Employee’s annual target bonus percent established for the bonus year prior to the bonus year in which Employee’s date of termination is effective (or such greater percent as shall be designated by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time) multiplied by Employee’s annual base salary in effect as of the date of termination.
(ii)    If Employee’s termination is a Qualified CIC Termination, Employee shall be eligible to receive an amount equal to an additional _____1 times Employee’s annual target bonus percent for the prior bonus year (or such greater percent as shall be designated by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time) multiplied by Employee’s annual base salary in effect as of the date of termination.”   










________________________
1 One/Chief Executive Officer; one-half/other participating executive officers.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee have executed this amendment on the dates set forth below. 
THE MOSAIC COMPANY


By:    ________________________________
                            
Its:      
Date:    August ___, 2015


EMPLOYEE


_______________________________________
[Employee]
Date:    August ___, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4624 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4624

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 125 Kerr Avenue in Rome City, Indiana, as the ``SPC Nicholas Scott 
                         Hartge Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPC NICHOLAS SCOTT HARTGE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 125 Kerr Avenue in Rome City, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``SPC Nicholas Scott Hartge Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``SPC 
Nicholas Scott Hartge Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 9, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

DUSTIN GLENN,
Petitioner, Case No. 3:17-cv-435

- VS - District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

PREBLE COUNTY SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT AND STATE OF OHIO,

Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 50), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and
noting two requests for extension of time to file objections were granted and no objections were filed
thereafter, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby
ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice.
Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to
the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore

should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

Q (~
August 24{, 2018. LD af TK Sen

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF WINDSOR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 8 AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE
RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN THE ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         235,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,633,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 763,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,827,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,369,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,121,700
<COMMON>                                     1,922,900
<OTHER-SE>                                   (837,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,827,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               893,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  440,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               310,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             224,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (82,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (82,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (82,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 640 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 640

To express the sense of the Senate on United States-Israel cooperation 
                     on precision-guided munitions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 2020

 Mr. Rounds submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To express the sense of the Senate on United States-Israel cooperation 
                     on precision-guided munitions.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the Department of Defense has cooperated extensively 
        with Israel to assist in the procurement of precision-guided 
        munitions, and such cooperation represents an important example 
        of robust United States support for Israel;
            (2) to the extent practicable, the Secretary of Defense 
        should take further measures to expedite deliveries of 
        precision-guided munitions to Israel; and
            (3) regularized annual purchases of precision-guided 
        munitions by Israel, in accordance with existing requirements 
        and practices regarding the export of defense articles and 
        defense services, coordinated with the United States Air Force 
        annual purchase of precision-guided munitions, would enhance 
        the security of both the United States and Israel by--
                    (A) promoting a more efficient use of defense 
                resources by taking advantage of economies of scale;
                    (B) enabling the United States and Israel to 
                address crisis requirements for precision-guided 
                munitions in a timely and flexible manner; and
                    (C) encouraging the defense industrial base to 
                maintain routine production lines of precision-guided 
                munitions.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joe TULL *v.*BENTON STATE BANK, Administrator

74-213

516 S.W. 2d 583

Opinion delivered December 16, 1974

*John W. Barley,*for appellant.

*Fred E. Briner,*for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The issue in this will contest is the validity of a will which obviously was extensively altered — in fact, almost completely rewritten — by the testatrix after its original execution and attestation. The probate judge sustained the validity of the instrument, on the ground that the testatrix intended for it to be her will. The appellant, the testatrix’s brother, contested the will and now contends, correctly, that the altered instrument must be rejected, because it was not re-executed and re-attested in its altered form.

The instrument consists of two pages. The first page, on white paper, is very badly typed. It contains seven numbered paragraphs. The last six of those paragraphs make six different bequests or devises and constitute all the dispositive provisions in the will. Paragraph “Seventh” is the residuary clause, leaving the testatrix’s real property and certain personal property “to my Sister, Rena Glass.”

*387The second page, on blue paper, is neatly typed. It contains the final paragraph, which reads: “Fifth: I hereby appoint my sister, Rena Glass, executrix of this my last will and testament on this 25th day of July, 1964.” After that come the signature of the testatrix, Myrtice Westbrook, the attestation clause, and the signatures of two attesting witnesses.

It is conclusively shown by the testimony, as well as by the will itself, that page one was retyped (presumably by the testatrix) and substituted for the original page one, which apparently was destroyed. In addition to the variances that we have mentioned — the differences in the color of the paper, in the typing, and in the paragraph numbers — page one refers to the testatrix’s sister as Rena Glass, although she did not marry Mr. Glass until some 18 months after the date of the will, July 25, 1964. (On page two Rena’s surname at the time, Andrews, was obviously erased, and the name “Glass” typed over the erasure.)

The trial judge based his decision upholding the will upon his finding that it was the testatrix herself who retyped and substituted the first page of the will. We have no quarrel with that finding of fact, but it does not serve to validate the altered will. Here the testatrix, in effect, revoked all the dis-positive provisions in her original will and substituted those appearing on the rewritten first page of the instrument offered for probate. In those circumstances a re-execution and re-attestation of the will were essential to its validity. *Walpole*v. *Lewis,*254 Ark. 89, 492 S.W. 2d 410 (1973); *Cook*v. *Jeffett,*169 Ark. 62, 272 S.W. 873 (1925). Hence the altered instrument cannot be probated as the testatrix’s will.

Reversed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Clicker Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Albert Aimers, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Clicker Inc. and will be retained by Clicker Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  January 19, 2011
By:
/s/ ALBERT AIMERSAlbert Aimers

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Frank G. RHODES, Appellant, v. Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden of Colorado State Penitentiary, Canon City, Colorado, Appellee.

No. *7948.*

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

April 2, 1965.

*136Ronald S. Luedemann, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

John E. Bush, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges, and DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a Colorado state prisoner, filed with the Chief Judge of this Court an application for a writ of habeas corpus which by order dated August 21, 1964, was transferred to the District Court for the District of Colorado pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2241(b). The- District Court denied the application without a hearing upon the grounds that appellant’s contention that his confession had been improperly admitted into evidence during the state trial stated an issue that had been fully heard and found to be without merit in a prior habeas corpus proceeding lodged as an original action in that federal district court. The order of denial stated the trial court’s satisfaction that the ends of justice would not be served by further inquiry upon the issue. This appeal follows the order of denial.

The record clearly shows that appellant's contentions were fully considered in his prior application and our consideration of the earlier proceedings (which include a review of the entire state court proceedings) indicates no abuse of discretion upon the part of the trial court in refusing further inquiry. The case falls squarely within the contemplation of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 224-4.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Marcus Faust, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Metropolitan Financial Corp. (the "Company") certifies in his capacity as an
officer of the Company that he has reviewed Amendment No. 1 to the Company's
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and that to his
knowledge:

           (1)      the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                    13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.


Date: April 30, 2003
                                           /s/ Marcus Faust
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Marcus Faust,
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          73,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  388,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               597,819
<PP&E>                                         388,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                 142,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,858,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          387,772
<BONDS>                                        613,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       851,189
<OTHER-SE>                                     (43,459)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,858,272
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               416,544
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  394,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
AO 93 (Rev. 11/13) Search and Seizure Warrant (Page 2)

Return
Case No.: Date and time warrant executed: Copy of warrant and inventory left with:
31% mj 34B | 05/30)2019 Ov: 004M TOMME Herzen

Inventory made in the presence of :

N/A

Inventory of the property taken and name of any person(s) seized:

No ITEMS were SEIZED

8102

Certification

I declare under penalty of perjury that this inventory is correct and was returned along with the original warrant to the
designated judge.

pac Gls} 2018 Mad 3. le

Executing officer's siffature

SPeciac_ Keer Micwher HeRwig_, FRI

Printed name and title