alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4 to Electro-Sensors, Inc. Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2008







Exhibit 10.4


 


SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


2008 FISCAL YEAR


 


Electro-Sensors, Inc. (the “Company”) currently does not have written employment agreements with its executive officers, who serve as “at-will” employees pursuant to oral arrangements with the Company. For the 2008 fiscal year, the Company’s executive officers were entitled to the base salaries set forth below.


 





	
Executive Officer and Title
 	
2008 Annual Base Salary
 
	
Bradley D. Slye

Chairman, President, CEO and
CFO
 	
$176,000
 
	
Peter R. Peterson

Secretary
 	
$100,000
Summary of Directors Compensation



 Exhibit 10.42 
 Each Director who is not an employee of Midas, Inc. or any of its affiliated companies (the “Company”) receives an annual retainer as director compensation. The Lead Director receives an annual retainer of
$70,000, while each Director who is also the Chairperson of a Board Committee receives an annual retainer of $50,000. In addition, any Director who is not the Chairperson of a Board Committee but serves as a Financial Expert of the Audit and Finance
Committee similarly receives an annual retainer of $50,000. No additional fees are paid for meeting attendance. 
 Each non-employee Director
is also granted an Annual Director Restricted Stock Award pursuant to the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan. Each Annual Director Restricted Stock Award consists of 2,000 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock. These restricted
shares become exercisable in equal annual installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. In the event of a Change in Control, as defined in the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, each restricted share will vest and, in
certain cases, will be settled in cash by the Company. 
 In addition to the annual retainers and restricted stock awards described above,
commencing in 2009, each Director is entitled to reimbursement from the Company of up to $1,000 in expenses relating to director education.
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 1 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article 

3 I of the Constitution, during the One Hundred Seven4 teenth Congress the Speaker of the House and the Major5 ity Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, act6 ing jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 

7 the House and the Minority Leader of the 
2 

•HCON 1 EH 

1 Senate, may notify the Members of the House and the 

2 Senate, respectively, to assemble at a place outside the 

3 District of Columbia if, in their opinion, the public interest 

4 shall warrant it. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 4, 

2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 1 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of 

government.
<PAGE>   1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

     Each of the undersigned officers and directors of Applied Innovation Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby appoints Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr.
and Curtis A. Loveland as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, or either of
them, with power to act without the other, as his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, in his name and on his behalf, and in any and all capacities
stated below, to sign and to cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the Company's annual report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December
31, 1996, and any and all amendments thereto, hereby granting unto said
attorneys, and to each of them, full power and authority to do and perform in
the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all such capacities, every
act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully
as each of the undersigned could or might do in person, hereby granting to each
such attorney full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that either such attorney or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney in
counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 23, 1997.



                                     /s/ Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr.
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Gerard B. Moersdorf, Jr.
                                     Chairman, President and Treasurer
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

                                     /s/ John M. Spiegel
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     John M. Spiegel, Comptroller
                                     (Principal Accounting Officer)


                                     /s/ James H. Blough
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     James H. Blough, Director


                                     /s/ Curtis A. Loveland
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Curtis A. Loveland, Director


                                     /s/ Gerard B. Moersdorf, Sr.
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Gerard B. Moersdorf, Sr., Director


                                     /s/ Richard W. Oliver
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Richard W. Oliver, Director


                                     /s/ Thomas W. Huseby
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Thomas W. Huseby, Director
Order entered March 19, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01350-CV

MIRAMAR FAIRMOUNT PARTNERS, LLC AND 

CALABAZA HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellants

V.

2902 MAPLE, LP, ANDERS P. TING, AND COMERICA BANK, Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-10049

ORDER

Before the Court is the March 12, 2020 unopposed second motion of 

Comerica Bank and Anders P. Ting for an extension of time to file their appellees’ 

brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to April 8, 2020. We caution 

appellees that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THOMAS SLOANE,

Plaintiff.

v.

GULF INTERSTATE FIELD 

SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant.

No. 4:16-CV-01571

(Judge Brann)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of February 2018, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 210, is DENIED.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of the Declaration of Thomas 

Sloane, ECF No. 216, is DENIED AS MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case: 2:18-cv-00583-EAS-EPD Doc #: 221 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 7132
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance

State Implementation Plan Revision

Attachment IX

Listing of New Hampshire OBD II Inspection Stations

Prepared by

New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services

November 1, 2011
Case 1:01-cv-00125-SSB-TSH Document 156 Filed 02/24/2005 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00125-SSB-TSH Document 156 Filed 02/24/2005 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00125-SSB-TSH Document 156 Filed 02/24/2005 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00125-SSB-TSH Document 156 Filed 02/24/2005 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00125-SSB-TSH Document 156 Filed 02/24/2005 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00125-SSB-TSH Document 156 Filed 02/24/2005 Page 6 of 6
(logo)LSI
                                                                 FINANCIAL GROUP



As of and for the year ended December 31, 1995, LSI Financial Group has complied
in all material respects with the minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the
Mortgage  Bankers   Association of America's Uniform SINGLE ATTESTATION  PROGRAM
FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS. As of and for this same period,  LSI Financial  Group had
in  effect a  fidelity  bond and  errors  and  omissions  policy  in the  amount
of $1,000,000 and $5,000,000, respectively.


/s/Dennis R. James
Dennis R. James
Chief Operating Officer

May 17, 1996



                                                              415 NORTH McKINLEY
                                                                      SUITE 1250
                                                     LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72205
                                                                    501-663-9300
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

TINA BRICKLES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

VILLAGE OF PHILLIPSBURG, OHIO, 

et al.,

Defendants. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:18-cv-193 

District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

ORDER

For good cause shown, the parties’ Third Joint Motion to Extend Select Case 

Deadlines (Doc. No. 56) is GRANTED. The case shall proceed as follows: 

Discovery deadline: November 19, 2020. 

Dispositive motion deadline: December 14, 2020. 

Telephone Conference (following discovery): December 8, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. 

The remaining deadlines are unaffected. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

October 13, 2020 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 3:18-cv-00193-TMR-SLO Doc #: 57 Filed: 10/14/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 555
**Exhibit 15**

July 20, 2009 

Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee 

    for the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust: 

Re: Registration Statements No. 33-55784 and No. 333-91460 on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 20, 2009 related to ourreview of interim financial information. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of aregistration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

KPMG LLP 

Fort Worth, Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NCMIC INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

RYAN D. SMITH, D.C., et al., 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action 2:18-cv-533 

Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff commenced this action on May 31, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) To date, Plaintiff has 

not moved to amend the Complaint to substitute the real names for Jane Doe Defendants 2-50 

nor effected service upon them as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). 

Accordingly, on February 2, 2019, this Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause 

why the Court should not dismiss Jane Doe Defendants 2-50 and why the Court should allow an 

extension of time to effect service. (ECF No. 43.) Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s response to 

the show cause order, the Court found good cause to extend the time to effect service over Jane 

Doe Defendants 2-50 until April 22, 2019. (ECF No. 45.) The Court cautioned that failure to 

serve Jane Doe Defendants 2-50 by April 22, 2019, will result in this action being dismissed 

without prejudice as to Jane Doe Defendants 2-50. (Id.) 

On April 22, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Status Report and Response to the Court’s Orders 

(ECF No. 55), asserting that it “has been unable to identify or serve Defendants Jane Does 2-50,” 

and “understands this Court may determine to dismiss [Plaintiff’s] action as to Jane Doe 
2 

Defendants 2-50 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).” (ECF No. 55 at 1-2.) It is 

therefore RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

against Jane Doe Defendants 2-50 pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of 

process. 

PROCEDURE ON OBJECTIONS 

If any party objects to this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen 

(14) days of the date of this Report, file and serve on all parties written objections to those 

specific proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made, together with 

supporting authority for the objection(s). A Judge of this Court shall make a de novo 

determination of those portions of the Report or specified proposed findings or recommendations 

to which objection is made. Upon proper objections, a Judge of this Court may accept, reject, or 

modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made herein, may receive further 

evidence or may recommit this matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1). 

The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and 

Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to have the District Judge review the Report 

and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of 

the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 

(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). 

/s/ Chelsey M. Vascura 

CHELSEY M. VASCURA 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Daniel M. Bradbury, thePresident and Chief Executive Officer of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“Company”), and Mark G. Foletta, the Senior Vice President, Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

**1.****            **The Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

**2.****            **The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by thePeriodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period coveredby the Periodic Report.

 

 

Dated:  November 4, 2008

 
| /S/  DANIEL M. BRADBURY                |                                                         | /S/ MARK G. FOLETTA |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
| Daniel  M. Bradbury                    | Mark  G. Foletta                                             |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer | Senior  Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/S/ PAUL G. GABOSPaul G. Gabos
Chief Financial Officer


May 6, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Christopher Stephen Myers, :

:

Plaintiff(s), :

: Case Number: 1:18cv457

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

Sheriff, Clermont County Jail, :

:

Defendant(s). :

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on August 30, 2018 (Doc. 7), to whom this case was referred

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the

time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired September 13, 2018, hereby

ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation was sent by regular mail to the parties on August 30,

2018. On September 19, 2018, the mail was returned undeliverable and the return was marked

refused.

Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 74 Filed: 12/14/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 496
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-30908

Summary Calendar

 

ROBERT JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HISTORIC RESTORATION, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(98-CV-3088-B)

--------------------

February 2, 2000

Before POLITZ, JONES, and WIENER, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Johnson appeals the dismissal with

prejudice by the district court of his employment discrimination

and tort claims against Defendant-Appellee Historic Restoration,

Inc. ("HR"), for failure timely and properly to effectuate service

of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 4. Concluding that (1)

the district court correctly determined that Johnson's otherwise

timely service on a common law employee of HR without demonstrating

anything approaching a diligent effort to accomplish service on

that corporation's registered agent was ineffective, and (2) the
2

district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to give

Johnson additional time to effect service, principally because

Johnson failed to show good cause for his failure to accomplish

valid service within the statutory 120 days following the filing of

his complaint, we affirm. 

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and the facts

and law as related to us by counsel in their respective appellate

briefs, and have likewise carefully considered the Order & Reasons

entered by the district court on July 20, 1999, as a result of

which we are convinced that the district court not only did not

commit reversible error but affirmatively ruled correctly and

analyzed the issues accurately and completely. Rather than wasting

judicial resources by writing anew, therefore, we affirm for the

reasons set forth by the district court and adopt its Order &

Reasons by reference.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                      LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT           EXHIBIT 21.1


SUBSIDIARIES OF DECRANE AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC.

AEROSPACE DISPLAY SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

AUDIO INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Arkansas corporation.

AVTECH CORPORATION, a Washington corporation.

CARL F. BOOTH & CO., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

COLTECH, INC., a Texas corporation.

CORY COMPONENTS, INC., a California corporation.

CUSTOM WOODWORK & PLASTICS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

DAH-IP HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DAH-IP INFINITY, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT FURNITURE CO., LP, a Texas limited partnership.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT INTERNATIONAL SALES, INC., a Barbados corporation.

DETTMERS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation.

ELSINORE AEROSPACE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation.

ELSINORE ENGINEERING, INC., a Delaware corporation.

ERDA, INC., a Wisconsin Corporation.

FLIGHT REFUELING, INC., a Maryland corporation.

HOLLINGSEAD INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation.

HOLLINGSEAD INTERNATIONAL, LTD., a UK company.

INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM INTERIORS, INC., a Florida corporation.

PATRICK AIRCRAFT TANK SYSTEMS, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PATS AIRCRAFT AND ENGINEERING CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation.

PATS SUPPORT, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PATS, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PCI NEWCO, INC., a Delaware Corporation.

PPI HOLDINGS, INC., a Kansas corporation.

PRECISION PATTERN, INC., a Kansas corporation.

THE INFINITY PARTNERS, LTD., a Texas limited partnership.

TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS EUROPE S.A., a Swiss company.

TRI-STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation.

TRI-STAR TECHNOLOGIES, a California general partnership.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (136)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,012
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,043
<PP&E>                                           3,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,239)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,980
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,176)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,067
<SALES>                                         10,103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,103
<CGS>                                            6,946
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (892)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>