alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frederick W. DENNISTON et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 18816.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Jan. 11, 1965.

Decided Jan. 28, 1965.

Mr. Frederick W. Denniston, petitioner pro se.

Mr. Crombie J. D. Garrett, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen., Louis F. Oberdorfer and Mr. Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for respondent.

Mr. Sheldon S. Cohen, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, also entered an appearance for respondent.

Before Bazelon, Chief Judge, and Fahy and Burgee, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioners, a husband and wife filing a joint income tax return, seek reversal of a Tax Court determination that moneys the husband received as a Government Employees’ Incentive Award were includible in gross income. We affirm, adopting the decision of the Tax Court.

The excellent services which led to the award in question were just those which the husband had been instructed to perform in the course of his employment. The statute under which the award to him was made does not authorize awards for “religious, charitable, scientific, educational, artistic, literary, or civic achievement” (26 U.S.C. § 74(b)) ; rather, it authorizes discretionary awards by department heads to those Government employees who “contribute to the efficiency, economy, or other improvement of Government operations or who perform special acts or services in the public interest in connection with or related to *313their official employment' (5 U.S.C. § 2123(a)). The awards are thus made for performance as an employee; that the achievement rewarded might in some contexts be classifiable as “civic” or another of the statutory categories of § 74 (b) is not relevant.

Affirmed.

FAHY, Circuit Judge, concurs in the result.
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 1 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 2 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 3 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 4 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 5 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 6 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 7 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 8 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 9 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 10 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 11 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 12 of 13

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 107-2      Filed 11/09/2005     Page 13 of 13
<PAGE>
                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          Washington D. C. 20549

                               Form 10-Q/A


    X  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
       SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY  PERIOD ENDED
       MARCH 29, 1997, OR

       TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
       SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
       ___________ TO _______________


Commission File Number 0-19791

                            USFREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware                                             36-3790696
(State of Incorporation)                   (IRS Employer Identification No.)

9700 Higgins Road, Rosemont, Illinois                           60018
(Address of principal executive offices)                     (Zip Code)

                            Registrant's telephone number
                         including area code: (847) 696-0200

                              Not applicable
     (Former name or former address, if changed since the last report)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.      Yes X    No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of April 16, 1997, 25,797,457 shares of common stock were outstanding.


================================================================================

<PAGE>

Item 6.        Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

               (a)  Exhibits
                    1.   Exhibit 27. Financial Data Schedule.

               (b)  Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed:
                    1.   On January 7, 1997 reporting a subsequent litigation
                         matter for the fourth quarter 1996.




                         SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the  requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
Act of 1934,  the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Dated the 6th day of May, 1997.


                                   USFREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION

                                   By: /s/ Christopher L. Ellis
                                           --------------------
                                           Christopher L. Ellis
                                           Senior Vice President, Finance and
                                           Chief Financial Officer

                                   By: /s/ Robert S. Owen
                                           --------------
                                           Robert S. Owen
                                           Controller and Principal
                                           Accounting Officer
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 NUMBER SHARES 
Equity

Bancshares, Inc. 
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS SEE
REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
CLASS A COMMON STOCK CUSIP 29460X 10 9 
This
Certifies That: 
PROOF 
is the owner of 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK OF $.01 PAR VALUE EACH OF Equity Bancshares, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney
upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Kansas, and to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter
amended. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent. 
WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its
duly authorized officers. 
Dated: 
SECRETARY 
Equity Bancshares, Inc. CORPORATE SEAL 2002 KANSAS 
COUNTERSIGNED: CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER
& TRUST COMPANY 
NEW YORK, NY TRANSFER AGENT 
BY: CHAIRMAN AND CEO
AUTHORIZED OFFICER 







 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

											
	TEN COM	 	-	 	as tenants in common	 		 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -	 	                      Custodian             
               
	TEN ENT	 	-	 	as tenants by the entireties	 		 		 	      (Cust)                            
(Minor)
	JT TEN	 	-	 	as joint tenants with right of	 		 		 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
		 		 	survivorship and not as tenants	 		 		 	Act                                     
                        
		 		 	in common	 		 		 	                 (State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For Value Received,
                     hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
  

			
	  PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER   IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	  	
	    	  	

  
   

 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS,
INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 
  
  

 
  
  

 

			
	  
	 	Shares

 of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

 

			
	  
	 	Attorney

 to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

  

			
	Dated	 	  


  

			
		 	  

		 	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.

  

					
	Signature(s) Guaranteed	 	
			
	By	 	  
	 	
	The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program),
pursuant to SEC Rule 17Ad-15.
Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 1 of 28  PAGEID #: 179

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 2 of 28  PAGEID #: 180

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 3 of 28  PAGEID #: 181

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 4 of 28  PAGEID #: 182

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 5 of 28  PAGEID #: 183

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 6 of 28  PAGEID #: 184

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 7 of 28  PAGEID #: 185

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 8 of 28  PAGEID #: 186

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 9 of 28  PAGEID #: 187

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 10 of 28  PAGEID #: 188

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 11 of 28  PAGEID #: 189

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 12 of 28  PAGEID #: 190

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 13 of 28  PAGEID #: 191

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 14 of 28  PAGEID #: 192

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 15 of 28  PAGEID #: 193

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 16 of 28  PAGEID #: 194

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 17 of 28  PAGEID #: 195

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 18 of 28  PAGEID #: 196

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 19 of 28  PAGEID #: 197

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 20 of 28  PAGEID #: 198

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 21 of 28  PAGEID #: 199

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 22 of 28  PAGEID #: 200

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 23 of 28  PAGEID #: 201

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 24 of 28  PAGEID #: 202

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 25 of 28  PAGEID #: 203

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 26 of 28  PAGEID #: 204

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 27 of 28  PAGEID #: 205

Case: 2:18-cr-00075-ALM Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page: 28 of 28  PAGEID #: 206
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7643

TRAVIS HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-121-3) Submitted: January 15, 2002 Decided: January 30, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Travis Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Travis Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hill v. Angelone , No. CA-01-121-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Reed *v.*Billingslea.

5-1004

291 S. W. 2d 497

Opinion delivered June 18, 1956.

*Max M. Smith,*for appellant.

*George Howard, Jr.,*for appellee.

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

The question here is whether the appellant, Willie Cora Lee Hudson Reed, is the heir of Ollie Hudson, who died intestate on the first day of July, 1955, while a resident of Jefferson County. The chancellor held against heirship.

It is established by the evidence that appellant is the illegitimate daughter of Hudson. While living in Milwaukee, Wisconsin in June 1944, appellant desired to obtain a government job, and, to do so, it was necessary that she have a birth certificate; she wrote to her father *590in Pine Bluff, asking that he obtain and send to her snch a certificate. Hudson complied with her request, and the certificate states that he is the father of appellant; he signed it before a notary public. This birth certificate is the basis of appellant’s claim that she is the heir of her father, Ollie Hudson, although she is an illegitimate daughter.

An Act of the General Assembly of 1853, Ark. Stats. § 61-301-302, provides: (1) “In all cases hereafter, when any person may desire to make a person or persons his or her heirs at law, it shall be lawful to [do] so by a declaration in writing in favor of such person or persons, to be acknowledged before any judge, justice of the peace, clerk of any court, or before any court of record in this State.” (2) “Before said declaration shall be of any force or effect, it shall be recorded in the county where the said declarant may reside, or in the county where the person in whose favor such declaration is made, may reside.”

Since it is clear that appellant cannot prevail because the birth certificate shows no intent on the part of Hudson to make her his heir, it is unnecessary to discuss other points.

Application of the statute is not limited to situations where a person desires to make an illegitimate child his heir, but applies to any one that a person may desire to make his heir. The title of the act, as appearing in the Acts of 1852-4-6-8, page 207, is as follows: “An act to authorize and prescribe the manner by which persons in this State may adopt illegitimate children and others, and make them their Heirs at Law.” Thus, according to the act, a person may make any one his heir. But, a mere acknowledgment in writing by one person that another person is his illegitimate son or daughter is not sufficient under the statute to make such illegitimate person an heir of a father recognizing him as a son or daughter. The statute provides: “When any person may desire to make a person or persons his or her heirs at law, it shall be lawful to [do] so by a declaration in writing in favor of such person or persons.” *591Certainly, under this statute, nothing less than a declaration clearly stating that one wishes to make another his heir will suffice. Here, Hudson does not indicate in any manner that he wished to make appellant his heir. He merely procured for her a birth certificate, at her request. This cannot be said to be a declaration in writing to the effect that he wanted to make her his heir.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JOSHUA LANDERS, * Case No. 3:18-cv-175 

 

Petitioner, * 

District Judge Walter H. Rice 

-v- * Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

WARDEN, London Correctional * 

Institution 

 * 

Respondent. 

 DEFICIENCY ORDER 

 This case is before the Court on Petitioner’s filing of a Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 40) 

which was not accompanied by the appellate filing fee of $505.00. 

Pursuant to McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F. 3d 601 (1997), it is hereby ORDERED that 

Petitioner pay the filing fee of $505.00 not later than April 15, 2019, to the Clerk of this Court, OR

file by that date with the Sixth Circuit a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. 

Failure to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting 

documents with the Sixth Circuit (1) may result in dismissal of the appeal for failure to prosecute 

and (2) will result in this Court’s assessing the entire filing fee against Petitioner. If the appeal is 

dismissed for failure to prosecute, it will not be reinstated despite subsequent payment or filing of 

the in forma pauperis application. 

 The Clerk shall certify a copy of this Order to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

March 26, 2019. s/ Michael R. Merz 

 United States Magistrate Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   

<ARTICLE>                     5
                                                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-29-1997

<CASH>                                         3,403
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                172,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             221,672
<PP&E>                                       400,367
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               710,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        170,160
<BONDS>                                      100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                    347,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  710,640
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              355,817
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 336,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                    7,002
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             9,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    9,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.40
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71376-71377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28276]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Oregon Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the Oregon 
Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene on 
Thursday, December 18, 2014, at 1:00 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 
2:00 p.m. The meeting will be held by teleconference. The purpose of 
the meeting is for the Committee to discuss its report on the status of 
civil rights.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: 877-446-3914, conference ID: 440519. Any 
interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the 
meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate 
over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred 
charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over 
land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. Persons with 
hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling 
the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service 
with the conference call number and conference ID number.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the Western Regional Office by October 12, 
2014. The mailing address is Western Regional Office, U.S. Commission 
on Civil Rights, 300 N. Los Angeles St., Suite 2010, Los Angeles, CA 
90032. Persons wishing to email their comments may do so to 
atrevino@usccr.gov. Persons that desire additional information should 
contact Angelica Trevino, Western Regional Office, at (213) 894-3437.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this Committee 
are advised to go to

[[Page 71377]]

the Commission's Web site, www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western 
Regional Office at the above email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in November 25, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-28276 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7549

LARRY LADAIN MYERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VEDA PLAIR; KEITH MOORE, Officer; K. JENKINS, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1900-0-13BD) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: December 1, 2004 Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry LaDain Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry LaDain Myers appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Myers that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Myers failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Myers has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED