4708 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2022 / Notices 

10See Toyota Motor North America—Comments; 

https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=NHTSA2019-0098-0004. 

11See Toyota Comments 12–21–2020; https://

www.regulations.gov/document?D=NHTSA-2019- 

0098-0005. 

service replacement parts are not 

affected and contain required labels. 

Therefore, because these seat belt 

assemblies were configured specifically 

for installation in the subject vehicles, 

NHTSA does not find the likelihood 

that they will be removed from the 

subject vehicles and installed in other 

seating position or vehicles to be a 

safety concern based on the specific 

facts of this case. 

d. Mr. Thomas stated that the number 

of vehicles involved (70 maximum) 

were manufactured over a six-day 

period (July 25–30, 2019). A recall to 

correct the noncompliance should not 

pose an undue hardship on the world’s 

largest and wealthiest auto 

manufacturer. In general, an important 

consideration in determining 

inconsequentiality is the safety risk 

posed to individuals, not the quantity of 

vehicles affected. Since all the seat belt 

assemblies meet all other performance 

requirements of the standard, neither a 

small nor a big number of affected 

vehicles will play a decisive factor in 

the agency’s justification to grant or 

deny an inconsequentiality petition. Mr. 

Thomas also stated that the seat belt 

assemblies do not need to be replaced; 

a simple label with the required 

information could be applied to the 

retractor housing in order to bring the 

vehicles into compliance. Toyota has 

stated that the seat belt retractor indeed 

has a separate label with the supplier 

part number, which can further help 

identify the seat belt during 

replacement. 

3. Analysis and Response to the 

Comments From Toyota 

Toyota filed a separate 

noncompliance report on May 4, 2020, 

indicating that certain replacement seat 

belt assemblies may not have been 

packaged with an installation 

instruction sheet or may have been 

packaged with an incorrect instruction 

sheet intended for a different seatbelt 

assembly. Because of this additional 

noncompliance report, Toyota 

submitted a comment on June 24, 

2020,10 to offer supplemental reasoning 

in support of its petition. While some of 

the replacement assemblies covered by 

the May 4, 2020, noncompliance report 

are designed to be installed on the same 

model/MY Tacoma vehicles as the 70 

Tacoma vehicles that are the subject of 

its September 27, 2019, petition, Toyota 

stated that it checked the service history 

and CARFAX reports on all 70 of these 

Tacoma vehicles and none of them have 

replaced the rear center seat belt 

according to that information. As the 

replacement seat belt assemblies in 

Toyota part distribution centers that are 

affected by the issue described in the 

May 4, 2020, noncompliance report 

have been held, and their distribution 

prevented, it is highly unlikely that any 

of the aforementioned 70 Tacoma 

vehicles could be repaired using a 

replacement assembly affected by this 

missing or incorrect instruction sheet. 

Since the replacement seat belt 

assemblies of the affected 70 Tacoma 

vehicles have been held and their 

distribution prevented, NHTSA agrees 

that any future replacement assembly 

will not be affected by this missing or 

incorrect instruction sheet. 

Because the label is sewn to the rear 

center seat belt and has been removed 

while scanning the code on the label, 

NHTSA requested that Toyota provide 

additional information on December 7, 

2020, about how the label was removed 

and whether it affects the webbing 

strength. In response, Toyota submitted 

another comment on December 21, 

2020,11 explaining that they conducted 

additional testing and analysis to show 

that there is no visible effect on the seat 

belt stitching after removing the label by 

tearing it from where it was stitched. 

Measured pull forces in Toyota’s testing 

also indicate that the label tears at a 

much lower pull force than the force 

required to tear apart the seat belt 

stitching. The agency agrees that the 

removal of the label would not affect the 

webbing strength at the stitch location. 

NHTSA also believes that should the 

seat belts be the subject of a recall, the 

combination of traceability in the 

Toyota production system, along with 

the additional markings on the seat belt 

assemblies, would ensure that the seat 

belts can be easily identified without 

the label specified in paragraph S4.1(j) 

of FMVSS No. 209. 

Toyota also stated that each seat 

section, and the center rear seat belt, has 

a label with a code which is scanned 

into the seat supplier’s system and tied 

to each affected vehicle’s VIN for 

traceability. In the event of a safety 

recall for this part, Toyota believes the 

VIN is a sufficient means of identifying 

the potentially affected vehicles. 

Therefore, the agency agrees that, for the 

facts specific to this petition, the 

absence of the label specified in the 

standard poses no risk to motor vehicle 

safety. 

VIII. NHTSA’s Decision 

In consideration of the foregoing, 

NHTSA finds that Toyota has met its 

burden of persuasion that the subject 

FMVSS No. 209 noncompliance in the 

affected vehicles is inconsequential to 

motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, 

Toyota’s petition is hereby granted and 

Toyota is consequently exempted from 

the obligation of providing notification 

of, and a free remedy for, that 

noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 

and 30120. 

NHTSA notes that the statutory 

provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to 

file petitions for a determination of 

inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to 

exempt manufacturers only from the 

duties found in sections 30118 and 

30120, respectively, to notify owners, 

purchasers, and dealers of a defect or 

noncompliance and to remedy the 

defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this 

decision only applies to the subject 

vehicles that Toyota no longer 

controlled at the time it determined that 

the noncompliance existed. However, 

the granting of this petition does not 

relieve vehicle distributors and dealers 

of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for 

sale, or introduction or delivery for 

introduction into interstate commerce of 

the noncompliant vehicles under their 

control after Toyota notified them that 

the subject noncompliance existed. 

Finally, NHTSA would like to make 

clear that granting this petition in no 

way indicates a judgement by the 

agency that there is not a safety need for 

the FMVSS requirement(s) in question. 

In addition, the granting of the current 

petition in no way indicates NHTSA’s 

judgment in any future inconsequential 

noncompliance petition, regardless of 

the level of similarity with the current 

petition request. 

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: 

delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 

501.8) 

Otto G. Matheke III, 

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01794 Filed 1–27–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions 

on Proposed Highway Projects in 

Texas 

AGENCY: Texas Department of 

Transportation (TxDOT), Federal 

Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. 

Department of Transportation. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2022 / Notices 4709 

ACTION: Notice of limitation on claims 

for judicial review of actions by TxDOT 

and Federal agencies. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces actions 

taken by TxDOT and Federal agencies 

that are final. The environmental 

review, consultation, and other actions 

required by applicable Federal 

environmental laws for these projects 

are being, or have been, carried-out by 

TxDOT pursuant to an assignment 

agreement executed by FHWA and 

TxDOT. The actions relate to various 

proposed highway projects in the State 

of Texas. These actions grant licenses, 

permits, and approvals for the projects. 

DATES: By this notice, TxDOT is 

advising the public of final agency 

actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A 

claim seeking judicial review of TxDOT 

and Federal agency actions on the 

highway projects will be barred unless 

the claim is filed on or before the 

deadline. For the projects listed below, 

the deadline is 150 days from the date 

of publication. If the Federal law that 

authorizes judicial review of a claim 

provides a time period of less than 150 

days for filing such a claim, then that 

shorter time period still applies. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Lee, Environmental Affairs 

Division, Texas Department of 

Transportation, 125 East 11th Street, 

Austin, Texas 78701; telephone: (512) 

416–2358; email: Patrick.Lee@txdot.gov. 

TxDOT’s normal business hours are 8:00 

a.m.–5:00 p.m. (central time), Monday 

through Friday. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

environmental review, consultation, and 

other actions required by applicable 

Federal environmental laws for these 

projects are being, or have been, carriedout by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 

and a Memorandum of Understanding 

dated December 9, 2019, and executed 

by FHWA and TxDOT. 

Notice is hereby given that TxDOT 

and Federal agencies have taken final 

agency actions by issuing licenses, 

permits, and approvals for the highway 

projects in the State of Texas that are 

listed below. 

The actions by TxDOT and Federal 

agencies and the laws under which such 

actions were taken are described in the 

Categorical Exclusion (CE), 

Environmental Assessment (EA), or 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

issued in connection with the projects 

and in other key project documents. The 

CE, EA, or EIS and other key documents 

for the listed projects are available by 

contacting the local TxDOT office at the 

address or telephone number provided 

for each project below. 

This notice applies to all TxDOT and 

Federal agency decisions as of the 

issuance date of this notice and all laws 

under which such actions were taken, 

including but not limited to: 

1. General: National Environmental 

Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321– 

4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 

U.S.C. 109]. 

2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401– 

7671(q)]. 

3. Land: Section 4(f) of the 

Department of Transportation Act of 

1966 [49 U.S.C. 303]; Landscaping and 

Scenic Enhancement (Wildflowers) [23 

U.S.C. 319]. 

4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act 

[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section 

1536], Marine Mammal Protection Act 

[16 U.S.C. 1361], Fish and Wildlife 

Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661– 

667(d)], Migratory Bird Treaty Act [16 

U.S.C. 703–712]. 

5. Historic and Cultural Resources: 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act of 1966, as amended 

[54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq.]; Archeological 

Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16 

U.S.C. 470(aa)–11]; Archeological and 

Historic Preservation Act [54 U.S.C. 

312501 et seq.]; Native American Grave 

Protection and Repatriation Act 

(NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001–3013]. 

6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights 

Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)– 

2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious 

Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; Farmland 

Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C. 

4201–4209]. 

7. Wetlands and Water Resources: 

Clean Water Act [33 U.S.C. 1251–1377] 

(Section 404, Section 401, Section 319); 

Land and Water Conservation Fund 

(LWCF) [16 U.S.C. 4601–4604]; Safe 

Drinking Water Act (SDWA) [42 U.S.C. 

300(f)–300(j)(6)]; Rivers and Harbors Act 

of 1899 [33 U.S.C. 401–406]; Wild and 

Scenic Rivers Act [16 U.S.C. 1271– 

1287]; Emergency Wetlands Resources 

Act [16 U.S.C. 3921, 3931]; TEA–21 

Wetlands Mitigation [23 U.S.C. 

103(b)(6)(m), 133(b)(11)]; Flood Disaster 

Protection Act [42 U.S.C. 4001–4128]. 

8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 

Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 

Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898 

Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and 

Enhancement of Cultural Resources; 

E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O. 

13287 Preserve America; E.O. 13175 

Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514 

Protection and Enhancement of 

Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112 

Invasive Species. (Catalog of Federal 

Domestic Assistance Program Number 

20.205, Highway Planning and 

Construction.) 

The projects subject to this notice are: 

1. The Woodrow Road widening 

project extends from FM 1730 (Slide 

Road) to US 87 in Lubbock County, 

Texas. TxDOT plans to widen Woodrow 

Road by converting the existing twoway rural roadway to a five-lane urban 

facility with right-turn lanes at major 

intersections. Shared-use paths and 

sidewalks with ADA ramps will be 

constructed throughout the project. This 

project is approximately 4.75 miles in 

length and will improve transportation 

infrastructure to current design 

standards and improve mobility in 

southern Lubbock County. The actions 

by TxDOT and Federal agencies and the 

laws under which such actions were 

taken are described in the Categorical 

Exclusion Determination issued on 

September 7, 2021, and other 

documents in the TxDOT project file. 

The Categorical Exclusion 

Determination and other documents in 

the TxDOT project file are available by 

contacting the TxDOT Lubbock District 

Office at 135 Slaton Road, Lubbock, 

Texas 79404; telephone (806)748–4472. 

2. SH 30 from 2,225-ft west of 

Gibbons Creek to 2,225-ft east of 

Gibbons Creek, Grimes County, Texas. 

The project would replace a bridge on 

SH 30 at Gibbons Creek. The proposed 

structure would be 86-ft wide and 550- 

ft long and would incorporate bridge 

and approach rails that meet current 

standards. The proposed bridge would 

be shifted slightly north of the current 

alignment and the project would require 

3.854 ac of new right-of-way. The 

purpose of the proposed project is to 

improve safety by bringing the bridge 

and approaches up to current standards. 

The actions by TxDOT and Federal 

agencies and the laws under which such 

actions were taken are described in, the 

Categorical Exclusion Determination 

issued on September 23, 2021 and other 

documents in the TxDOT project file. 

The Categorical Exclusion 

Determination and other documents in 

the TxDOT project file are available by 

contacting TxDOT at the address 

provided above or the TxDOT Bryan 

District Office at 2591 North Earl 

Rudder Fwy, Bryan, TX 77803; 

telephone (979)778–9764. 

3. Center Street from Kohlers Crossing 

to Burleson Street, Hays County. The 

project proposes to replace existing 

UPRR rail siding through downtown 

Kyle from Kohlers Crossing to Burleson 

Street. The project is approximately two 

miles in length. The actions by TxDOT 

and Federal agencies and the laws 

under which such actions were taken 

are described in the Categorical 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
4710 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2022 / Notices 

Exclusion Determination issued on 

October 1, 2021, and other documents 

in the TxDOT project file. The 

Categorical Exclusion Determination 

and other documents in the TxDOT 

project file are available by contacting 

the TxDOT Austin District Office at 

7901 North I–35, Austin, TX 78753; 

telephone 512–832–7000. 

4. FM 1560 from FM 471 to SH 16 in 

Bexar County, Texas. The project 

includes expanding the existing 

roadway from two to four lanes with a 

raised median or center turn lane and 

constructing bike lanes and sidewalks 

along the entire length of the project. 

The project is approximately 5.2 miles 

in length. The actions by TxDOT and 

Federal agencies and the laws under 

which such actions were taken are 

described in the Categorical Exclusion 

Determination issued on October 7, 

2021, and other documents in the 

TxDOT project file. The Categorical 

Exclusion Determination and other 

documents in the TxDOT project file are 

available by contacting the TxDOT San 

Antonio District Office at 4615 NW 

Loop 410, San Antonio, TX 78229; 

telephone (210) 615–5839. 

5. William Cannon Drive from 

McKinney Falls Parkway to Running 

Water Drive, Travis County. The project 

will improve William Cannon Drive 

from a two-lane undivided urban 

roadway to a four-lane divided urban 

roadway with bicycle and pedestrian 

accommodations. The project is 

approximately 0.88 miles in length. The 

actions by TxDOT and Federal agencies 

and the laws under which such actions 

were taken are described in the 

Categorical Exclusion Determination 

issued on October 13, 2021, and other 

documents in the TxDOT project file. 

The Categorical Exclusion 

Determination and other documents in 

the TxDOT project file are available by 

contacting the TxDOT Austin District 

Office at 7901 North I–35, Austin, TX 

78753; telephone 512–832–7000. 

6. SH 80 from SH 123 to BU 181E, in 

Karnes County, Texas. The purpose of 

the project is to improve mobility along 

SH 80 by widening and rehabilitating 

SH 80 between SH 123 and BU 181E. 

The proposed project would involve 

widening and reconstruction of the 

main lanes, adding a continuous center 

left turn lane, and including pedestrian 

accommodations and replacement of 

traffic signals in portions of the project 

area, for approximately 1.8 miles. The 

actions by TxDOT and Federal agencies 

and the laws under which such actions 

were taken are described in the 

Categorical Exclusion Determination 

issued on October 15, 2021 and other 

documents in the TxDOT project file. 

The Categorical Exclusion 

Determination and other documents in 

the TxDOT project file are available by 

contacting TxDOT at the address 

provided above or the TxDOT Corpus 

Christi District Office at 1701 South 

Padre Island Drive, Corpus Christi, TX 

78416; telephone (361) 808–2500. 

7. IH 45 Frontage Road Conversion 

and Ramp Relocation, 1.6 Miles North 

of FM 27 to 1.5 Miles South of US 84, 

Freestone County, Texas. Construction 

includes ramp reconfiguration, frontage 

road rehabilitation, frontage road 

realignment, new location frontage road, 

and intersection improvements. The 

project would encompass 107.8 acres of 

disturbed construction activity. This 

project would require approximately 

6.44 acres of new ROW along the east 

side of the existing ROW. There are four 

proposed northbound new location 

ramps as follows: Exit ramps to Church 

Street, US 84, and FM 27. Also, a reconstructed entrance ramp from FM 27. 

There are five proposed southbound 

ramps as follows: New location, 

entrance ramp from Church Street, and 

new location exit ramps to Church 

Street, to US 84, to FM 27 with a 2-way 

westbound frontage road, and a new 

location exit ramp to the 2-way west 

frontage road north of the FM 27 exit 

ramp. All ramps would consist of a 14- 

ft travel lane with 6-ft outside shoulders 

and 2-ft inside shoulders. The IH 45 east 

side Frontage Road will be realigned at 

US 84 and FM 27. The remaining 

existing IH 45 East Frontage Road 

pavement will be rehabilitated. The IH 

45 east side Frontage Road will be 

extended from Church Street to US 84. 

The IH 45 west side Frontage Road will 

be realigned at Church Street, US 84, 

and FM 27. The remaining existing IH 

45 west side Frontage Road pavement 

will be rehabilitated. Between US 84 

and FM 27 the east and west frontage 

roads would consist of two 12-ft oneway travel lanes with 4-ft inside and 

outside shoulders, and the outside 

shoulder would be bounded with curb 

and gutter. Behind the curb sections 

there may be an offset of approximately 

0 to 5 ft, and 10-ft shared use path. Both 

the IH 45 east side and west side 

frontage roads will be converted to oneway operation from Church Street to FM 

27. Two-way operation will remain 

south of Church Street and north of FM 

27 on the west side frontage road. Both 

east side and west side frontage roads 

would consist of two 12-ft travel lanes 

with 4-ft shoulders bounded by open 

ditches. The actions by TxDOT and 

Federal agencies and the laws under 

which such actions were taken are 

described in the Categorical Exclusion 

Determination issued on October 22, 

2021, and other documents in the 

TxDOT project file. The Categorical 

Exclusion Determination and other 

documents in the TxDOT project file are 

available by contacting the TxDOT 

Bryan District at 2591 N Earl Rudder 

Fwy, Bryan, TX 77803; telephone (979) 

778–9764. 

8. Interstate Highway 35 (I–35), from 

north of SE Inner Loop to south of RM 

1431 (southbound), Williamson County, 

Texas. This project will take place in the 

cities of Georgetown and Round Rock 

along 4.4 miles of I–35. The project will 

involve various improvements to I–35, 

SE Inner Loop, and Westinghouse Road. 

The project includes: Removing the 

Westinghouse Road bridge and 

constructing a new I–35 bridge over 

Westinghouse Road; constructing 

westbound to southbound Continuous 

Flow Intersection at Westinghouse 

Road; improving intersection at I–35 

and SE Inner Loop; improve existing 

southbound I–35 frontage road from 

north of SE Inner Loop to RM 1431; 

reversing entrance/exit ramps along the 

southbound I–35 frontage road between 

SE Inner Loop and RM 1431; and 

improving bicycle and pedestrian 

sidewalks and paths. The actions by 

TxDOT and Federal agencies and the 

laws under which such actions were 

taken are described in the Categorical 

Exclusion Determination issued on 

November 9, 2021, and other documents 

in the TxDOT project file. The 

Categorical Exclusion Determination 

and other documents in the TxDOT 

project file are available by contacting 

the TxDOT Austin District Office at 

7901 North I–35, Austin, TX 78753; 

telephone: (512) 832–7000. 

9. US 59 Loop North from 

International Blvd. to 0.12 miles south 

of East Corridor Rd. in Webb County, 

Texas. This proposed project would 

upgrade the existing US 59 roadway to 

a full urban interstate expressway with 

three 12-ft. wide main lanes with 4-ft. 

wide inside shoulders and 10-ft. wide 

outside shoulders in each direction 

separated by an approximately 3-ft. tall 

concrete traffic barrier. One-direction 

frontage roads would consist of three 

12-foot lanes with 4-foot wide inside 

shoulders and 2-foot wide outside 

shoulders. There would be main lane 

overpasses at each of the major arterial 

street intersections at (from north to 

south) Shiloh Road, Del Mar Boulevard, 

University Drive, and Jacaman Road. 

Storm water drainage would typically 

be via a mix of grass-lined open ditches 

and underground separate storm sewers 

that would outfall into storm water 

detention ponds that will be constructed 

adjacent to the proposed project. The 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2022 / Notices 4711 

actions by TxDOT and Federal agencies 

and the laws under which such actions 

were taken are described in the Final 

Environmental Assessment (EA) the 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

(FONSI) issued on 9/01/2021, and other 

documents in the TxDOT project file. 

The EA, FONSI and other documents in 

the TxDOT project file are available by 

contacting the TxDOT Laredo District 

Office at 1817 Bob Bullock Loop, 

Laredo, TX 78043, ATTN Raul LealLaredo District Public Information 

Officer; telephone: 956–712–7416; 

email: Raul.Leal@txdot.gov. The EA can 

also be viewed and downloaded from 

the following website: https://

www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/projects/ 

studies/laredo/092021.html. 

10. I–35 Capital Express North from 

SH 45N to US 290E, Travis and 

Williamson Counties. The project will 

add one non-tolled managed lane in 

each direction, reconstruct intersections 

and bridges to accommodate the 

additional lane and increase east/west 

mobility, add a diverging diamond 

interchange at Wells Branch Parkway, 

improve bicycle and pedestrian 

accommodations along I–35 frontage 

roads and at east/west crossings and 

make additional safety and mobility 

improvements. The project is 

approximately 11.5 miles in length. The 

actions by TxDOT and Federal agencies 

and the laws under which such actions 

were taken are described in the Final 

Environmental Assessment (EA), 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

(FONSI) issued on December 17, 2021 

and other documents in the TxDOT 

project file. The EA, FONSI and other 

documents in the TxDOT project file are 

available by contacting the TxDOT 

Austin District Office at 7901 North I– 

35, Austin, TX 78753; telephone: 512– 

832–7000. The EA and FONSI can also 

be viewed and downloaded from the 

following website: https://

my35capex.com/. 

11. I–35 Capital Express South from 

US 290W/SH 71 to SH 45SE, Travis and 

Hays Counties. The project would add 

two non-tolled high-occupancy 

managed lanes in each direction. The 

managed lanes would be elevated from 

north of Stassney Lane to south of 

William Cannon Drive. Additionally, 

the project would reconstruct bridges, 

add auxiliary lanes, improve bicycle 

and pedestrian accommodations along 

I–35 frontage roads and includes other 

safety and mobility improvements. The 

project is approximately 10 miles in 

length. The actions by TxDOT and 

Federal agencies and the laws under 

which such actions were taken are 

described in the Final Environmental 

Assessment (EA), Finding of No 

Significant Impact (FONSI) issued on 

December 21, 2021, and other 

documents in the TxDOT project file. 

The EA, FONSI and other documents in 

the TxDOT project file are available by 

contacting the TxDOT Austin District 

Office at 7901 North I–35, Austin, TX 

78753; telephone: 512–832–7000. The 

EA and FONSI can also be viewed and 

downloaded from the following website: 

https://my35capex.com/. 

Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). 

Michael T. Leary, 

Director, Planning and Program Development, 

Federal Highway Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01448 Filed 1–27–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Information Collection 

Renewal; Comment Request; Reverse 

Mortgage Products: Guidance for 

Managing Compliance and Reputation 

Risks 

AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency, Treasury (OCC). 

ACTION: Notice and request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The OCC, as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, invites the 

general public and other Federal 

agencies to comment on the renewal of 

an information collection, as required 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA). An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and respondents are not 

required to respond to, an information 

collection unless it displays a currently 

valid Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number. The OCC is 

soliciting comment concerning renewal 

of its information collection titled 

‘‘Reverse Mortgage Products: Guidance 

for Managing Compliance and 

Reputation Risks’’ (Guidance). 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

March 29, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Commenters are encouraged 

to submit comments by email, if 

possible. You may submit comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Email: prainfo@occ.treas.gov. 

• Mail: Chief Counsel’s Office, 

Attention: Comment Processing, Office 

of the Comptroller of the Currency, 

Attention: 1557–0246, 400 7th Street 

SW, suite 3E–218, Washington, DC 

20219. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th 

Street SW, Suite 3E–218, Washington, 

DC 20219. 

• Fax: (571) 465–4326. 

Instructions: You must include 

‘‘OCC’’ as the agency name and ‘‘1557– 

0246’’ in your comment. In general, the 

OCC will publish comments on 

www.reginfo.gov without change, 

including any business or personal 

information provided, such as name and 

address information, email addresses, or 

phone numbers. Comments received, 

including attachments and other 

supporting materials, are part of the 

public record and subject to public 

disclosure. Do not include any 

information in your comment or 

supporting materials that you consider 

confidential or inappropriate for public 

disclosure. 

Following the close of this notice’s 

60-day comment period, the OCC will 

publish a second notice with a 30-day 

comment period. You may review 

comments and other related materials 

that pertain to this information 

collection beginning on the date of 

publication of the second notice for this 

collection by the method set forth in the 

next bullet. 

• Viewing Comments Electronically: 

Go to www.reginfo.gov. Hover over the 

‘‘Information Collection Review’’ tab 

and click on ‘‘Information Collection 

Review’’ dropdown. Underneath the 

‘‘Currently under Review’’ section 

heading, from the drop-down menu 

select ‘‘Department of Treasury’’ and 

then click ‘‘submit.’’ This information 

collection can be located by searching 

by OMB control number ‘‘1557–0246’’ 

or ‘‘Reverse Mortgage Products: 

Guidance for Managing Compliance and 

Reputation Risks.’’ Upon finding the 

appropriate information collection, click 

on the related ‘‘ICR Reference Number.’’ 

On the next screen, select ‘‘View 

Supporting Statement and Other 

Documents’’ and then click on the link 

to any comment listed at the bottom of 

the screen. 

• For assistance in navigating 

www.reginfo.gov, please contact the 

Regulatory Information Service Center 

at (202) 482–7340. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shaquita Merritt, Clearance Officer, 

(202) 649–5490, Chief Counsel’s Office, 

Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency, 400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E– 

218, Washington, DC 20219. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal 

agencies must obtain approval from the 

OMB for each collection of information 

that they conduct or sponsor. 

‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined 

in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 

1320.3(c) to include agency requests or 

requirements that members of the public 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1