alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
r T ; rv 3 

## V - 1r

- nrz Z 

## gc5 o C O JOHNN Y L . DUPREE , PH.D .

MAYO R Conndl-Ward l Council-War d2 Coimcf l - War d3 Coiiiicfl-Ward 4 CouncU-Ward S Ki mBradle y Debora h Denar dDelgad o Carter Carrol l Dav e J . Ware , 1 1 Henry Naylo r Februar y 17,201 2 Mr . Dermi s DeVany Chief , EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Department

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Hattiesburg-Laure l Regiona l Airpor t (PIB ) Doc k DOT-OST-2001-1068 5 Dea r Mr . DeVany : W e hav e reviewe dth e EA S proposal s submitte d under Docke t DOT-OST-2001-10685 . W e hav e determine dtha t

th e proposal s submitte db y Multi-Aero Inc. , d/b/aAi r Choic e On e an d SeaPor

t Airlines , Inc . for Hattiesburg-Laurel , Mississipp i do no t mee t th e statutor

y requirement s o f

atwin-engin e aircraft . W e hav e als o determine dthat Citizen s Capital Corp . d/b/aBlu e Sk y Airline s doe s no t

hav e a n operatin g certificate . Furthermore , an y ai r servic e bi d t o our

communit

y tha t doe s no t hav e th e full suppor

t of a legac y carrier , throug h cod e shai e an djoin t ticke t pricing , wil l no t

b e practical , marketabl e o r allo w our ai r traveler s t o easil y flo w throug h th e National Pla n o f Integrate d Airport s System . W e appreciat e th e interes t

o f thes e airlines , bu t

d o no t endors e o r

suppor t thes e proposal s for

subsidize d essential ai r

servic e t o th e communitie s o f Hattiesbur g an d Laurel , MS . We reques t

that th e hold-i n orde r

that prohibite d Mesab aan d Pinnacl e Airline s d/b/ aDelt aConnectio n fro mterminatin g schedule dairlin e servic e t o Hattiesburg-Laurel , M S remai n i n effec t unti l fiarthe

r notice , o r unti l suc h tim e a s asuitabl e replacemen t whic h satisfie s th e community' s need s ca n b e found . W e woul dlik e t o than k

yoiufo r you r cooperatio n an d assistanc e i n thi s matter .

L/DuPree , Ph.D. ity o f Hattiesbur g JLD/km h Tfelephon e (601 ) 545-450 1 • Fa

x (601 ) 545-460 8 Emai l mayort^attiesburgms.co m• Websitewww.hattiesburgtns.co m
EXHIBIT 32.1


              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


In  connection  with  the  Annual Report of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-K  for  the period ending December 31, 2004, (the
"Report")  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission, I, Robert W.
Weaver,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  March 14, 2005

/s/  Robert W. Weaver
-----------------------
Robert W. Weaver
President and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)

                                      -67-
<PAGE>
Opinion filed Jun e 25 , 2 009



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

____________ 

### No. 1 1- 09 -0 00 72 -CV

____ ____ __ CA ROL J. M ORR IS, Ap pellant

V. STA TE OF TEX AS , A ppellee On App eal from the 238th Distric t Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV -46,715

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N I n this case, Car ol J . Morris per fec ted an a ppeal f rom a fina l judgment a

nd perma nent inj un c tio n e nte re d b y

the tr ia l c ourt

on Marc h 2 , 2 00 9, to a

ba te a nu isa

nc e loc a te d o n r e a l pr op e rt y owned by Morris and located at 210 S. L ee St., Midland, Texas. Morris has now f iled in this court a “Motion for State Court to Terminate I ts Jurisdiction Ove r the Permane nt I njunctio n . ” In t he motion, Morri s states that she has f iled a complaint in the United States District Court and, c on se qu e ntl y , r e qu e sts the fo llo wi ng re lie f: “ Mo rr is p ra y s th is E le ve nth Di str ic t Court of Ap pe a ls, termin at e its jurisdiction over the per manent injunction, filed Mar ch 2, 2009 . . . and a ll other2

equitable r e li e f to w h ic h s h e is ju s tl y e n ti tl e d
. ” M o r r is ’ s r e qu e s t f

o r th is c o u rt to te r

mi n a te our jurisdiction is gra

nted. The motion is gr anted in par t, and the appe al is dismis sed.

PER C URI AM
J une 25, 2009 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , a n d

S t r a n g e , J.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying  Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended  September 30, 2005 (the  Report),  I, Raymond P.  Warrell,  Jr.,  M.D.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 7, 2005

|/s/ RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR., M.D.
|---------------------------------
|Name:                            
|Title:                           

32

---
#### Crawford County Board of Education *v.*Schaberg School District No. 69.

4-2726

Opinion delivered November 7, 1932.

*466
      *D. H. Howell,*for appellant.

*Roy Gean,*for appellee.

McHaNey, J.

Tlie county boards of education of Crawford and Washington counties sought to. combine Mountainburg School District No. 16, Schaberg School District No. 69, and Armada School District No. 93 in Crawford County, Arkansas, and two sections of land in Mt. Olive School District No. 30 of Washington County, under § 53 of act 169 of 1931, commonly known as the “school law.” This section provides for the formation of school districts embracing territory in two or more counties. The procedure provided for in the second paragraph of that section was resorted to in this instance to effectuate the consolidation. It appears from the record that the two sections of land in Washington County which were sought to be included were wild and unoccupied. No person resided on said sections. The county boards entered an order creating the district, but on a trial *de novo*in the circuit court this order of consolidation was vacated and quashed.

For a reversal of the judgment of the circuit court, it is first contended that the court erred in issuing a writ of mandamus against appellant directing it to send up the record for trial *de novo.*It is contended that no appeal was taken as provided by law. We think appellant is in error, as, in the view we take of the matter, the order of the county board was void and was subject to be quashed, either by appeal or certiorari. The whole proceeding for the consolidation of the three districts was void for failure to comply with the applicable section of the “sehool law,” § 44, and not § 53. We think the procedure prescribed in § 53 was not open to appellants in this case for the reason that in reality it was not sought to form a district embracing territory in two counties. We' *467think the record clear that a small amount of territory in Washington Connty was included in the scheme of consolidation in order to avoid the procedure necessary to a consolidation under § 44. The real object of the consolidation was for the Mountainburg District to take in the territory of the Schaberg and Armada districts without the consent of the qualified electors in the latter districts. We do not think a fair construction of the ‘‘school law” would permit, the Mountainburg District to take over the other two without their consent by including two sections of uninhabitated wild land in Washington County. Section 44 provides, in express terms, that “no existing district shall be included in a new district under the provision of this section unless the majority of the qualified electors of the district to be included sign the petition, or, in case of an election, a majority of the voters in the election in the district on the question shall favor it.” The effect of this proceeding is for Mountainburg District to take Schaberg and Armada districts without their consent.

The circuit court correctly quashed the proceedings and order of the county board of education, and this judgment is therefore affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:18-mj-00532-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 29
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:18-mj-00532-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 30
**EXHIBIT 15**

April 25, 2008 

Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee 

  for the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust: 

Re: Registration Statements No. 33-55784 and No. 333-91460 on Form S-8 

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated April 24, 2008 related to our review ofinterim financial information. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registrationstatement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

KPMG LLP 

Fort Worth, Texas
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 3 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 4 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 5 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 6 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 7 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 8 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 9 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 10 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 11 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 12 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 13 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 14 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 15 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 16 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 17 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 18 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 19 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 20 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 21 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 22 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 23 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 24 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 25 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 26 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 27 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 28 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 29 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 30 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 31 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 32 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 33 of 34
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 124 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 34 of 34
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen
Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending October 2, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/        Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerNovember 4, 2009




26
C o MMONWt'-AU H Of K"11J!tf~EP 2 5 A q: I \..t 

OFFICE oF T HE GovERNOR 

September 15, 2010 

Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 4 

Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Dear Ms. Fleming: 

: ·.·-.·· ··-.: ' ,. . . !<.. y .·1( ) 6 () 1 

<~) (. )?-~) 5b d -:.:'1(:) ~ 1 

<~~t."J '·, l-·)6 .. I .-?" _";i / 

I am pleased to submit Kentucky's Application for Primacy of Class II 

wells along with supportive documentation required under the provisions of 

Section 1425 of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Your approval of our state's 

program pursuant to the Underground Injection Control program is 

respectfully requested. 

The Commonwealth of Kentucky is fortunate to have experienced, 

dedicated professionals serving in the Department for Natural Resources and 

the Division of Oil and Gas. I can certainly affirm that Kentucky is willing and 

able to carry out the program described in the accompanying application. 

For the purpose of this application, Mr. Marvin Combs, Assistant 

Director, Kentucky Division of Oil and Gas, will be acting as liaison with the 

EPA. Should you have any questions or require additional information, 

please contact Mr. Combs in the Division office at 502-573-0147 or by e-mail 

at marvin.combs@ky .gov. 

I look forward to EPA's favorable decision regarding this application 

and thank you in advance for your attention to this request. 

Enclosures 

KentuckyUnbridledSpJrit .com An Equal Opportun ity Employe~ M/F/0
Exhibit 11

                 STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
      SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
              (In thousands, except per share data)

                                           
                                             1996       1995  
<TABLE>
<S>                                         <C>        <C>
Net income used in calculating 
  primary and fully diluted earnings 
  per common share:
Continuing operations.....................  $8,740     $3,889
Discontinued operations...................     246           
  Net income..............................  $8,986     $3,889


Primary earnings per common share:

Weighted average shares outstanding.......   4,722      4,727
Add shares issuable assuming exercise
  of stock options........................     223           
    Weighted average number of shares
      used in calculating primary 
      earnings per common share...........   4,945      4,727

Primary earnings per common share:

Continuing operations.....................  $ 1.77     $  .82
Discontinued operations...................     .05           
  Primary earnings per common share.......  $ 1.82     $  .82

Fully diluted earnings per common 
share:

Weighted average shares outstanding.......   4,722      4,727
Add shares issuable assuming excercise
  of stock options........................     397                
    Weighted average number of shares
      used in calculating fully diluted
      earnings per common share...........   5,119      4,727
 
Fully diluted earnings per 
  common share:
Continuing operations.....................  $ 1.71     $  .82
Discontinued operations...................     .05           
  Fully diluted earnings per common share.  $ 1.76     $  .82
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:18-cr-141

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

JOSEPH THOMAS POWELL, JR., 

Defendant.

ORDER

On August 16, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to an

Information charging him with being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§

922(g), 924 (Count 1), and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841 (Count 2). (Doc. 20). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the

matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11

of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from

coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS
Defendant’s plea of guilty to Counts 1 and 2 of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged

guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-
FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO


VOTING
AGREEMENT





THIS
FIRST  AMENDMENT TO
VOTING  AGREEMENT  (this  "Amendment") is made and
entered  into on the 6th day
of  June,  2002,  by
and  among  James  P.  Jimirro
("Jimirro"), Daniel S. Laikin ("Laikin"), and Ronald Holzer
("Holzer").





RECITALS





A.
Jimirro, Laikin and Holzer are parties to that certain Voting Agreement dated as
of May 17, 2002, relating to their shares of the common stock and/or Series B
Convertible  Preferred Stock (the "Series B Preferred") of J2
Communications,  a
California  corporation  (the  "Company").  Various  other  shareholders  of
the Company are also parties to the Voting Agreement.





B.
Pursuant to Section 3(d) of the Voting Agreement, the Voting Agreement can be
amended in writing by Jimirro and the  holders of a majority of
the  outstanding shares of  Series
B  Preferred  that
were  purchased  pursuant  to
that  certain Preferred Stock and Warrant
Purchase  Agreement dated April 25, 2002, as amended by a First
Amendment to Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated May 17,
2002,  among the Company,  Laikin,  Holzer and
other  purchasers of Series B Preferred (the "Purchase
Agreement").





C.  Laikin
is the holder of more than a majority  of
the  outstanding  shares of Series B Preferred purchased
pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.





AGREEMENTS





NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of
the  foregoing  and  of the  mutual
promises and covenants made herein,  Jimirro,  Laikin and
Holzer agree to amend, and do hereby amend, the Voting Agreement as
follows:





Section  1.  Holzer  Removal.  Holzer
is  removed  as a party to the Voting Agreement effective as
of May 17, 2002.





Section
2. Continued Effect.  The Voting Agreement shall continue in effect as
to all parties thereto other than Holzer in accordance with its terms and as
amended hereby.





Section
3. Notice of Amendment.  Laikin will provide a
signed  photocopy of this  Amendment  to all
parties to the Voting  Agreement  who are not signers of
this Amendment.  However,  his failure to do so as to any or
all of such parties to the Voting  Agreement will not impair
the  effectiveness  of this  Amendment,
constitute   grounds  for   contesting   the  validity   hereof  or  impair  the
effectiveness or enforceability of the Voting Agreement as among or against such
party or parties, or any of the other parties thereto.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF Jimirro,  Laikin and Holzer have executed this
Amendment as of the date first above written.





/s/  James P.
      Jimirro
              
              /s/  Daniel S.
      LaikinJames
      P. Jimirro
              
              Daniel
      S. Laikin/s/ Ronald
      HolzerRonald
      Holzer