alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7103

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH ANDREW SADLER,

Defendant- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-93-160, CA-01-2192-6-20)

Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Andrew Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Frank McDonald,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Andrew Sadler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Sadler, Nos. CR-930-60; CA01-2192-6-20 (D.S.C. May 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Nicole Dawn Holland

Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel

1

CASE NO. 03-14-00577-CR

NICOLE DAWN HOLLAND § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

§

v. § 3RD SUPREME JUDICIAL

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § DISTRICT AT AUSTIN

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL

This Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel is brought by Tracy D. Cluck, 

Appellate Counsel for Nicole Dawn Holland. Movant requests the Court to grant 

Movant permission to withdraw as attorney for Appellant, Nicole Dawn Holland. 

In support thereof, Movant respectfully shows:

I.

An Anders brief has been filed in this matter, and therefore I am requesting 

to be relieved of my representation.

II.

A true and correct copy of this motion has been delivered to Appellant at her

current address: Nicole Dawn Holland, #01962247, Linda Woodman State Jail, 

1210 Coryell City Rd., Gatesville, TX 76528.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Movant prays that the Court 

enter an Order discharging Movant as attorney of record, in Cause No. 03-14-

00577-CR, for Appellant, Nicole Dawn Holland.

ACCEPTED

03-14-00577-CR

5360262

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

5/20/2015 2:02:14 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/20/2015 2:02:14 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Nicole Dawn Holland

Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel

2

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Tracy D. Cluck

TRACY D. CLUCK

Texas Bar No. 00787254

1450 West Hwy. 290, #855

Dripping Springs, TX 78620

Telephone: (512) 264-9997

tracy@tracyclucklawyer.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

NICOLE DAWN HOLLAND

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for Withdrawal 

of Counsel, has been served on the attorney listed below by e-serve and e-mail, on 

May 20, 2015:

424th & 33rd District Attorney’s Office

Mr. Gary Bunyard

g.bunyard@co.llano.tx.us

/s/ Tracy D. Cluck

_______________________________

TRACY D. CLUCK
Nicole Dawn Holland

Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel

3

CASE NO. 03-14-00577-CR

NICOLE DAWN HOLLAND § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

§

v. § 3RD SUPREME JUDICIAL

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § DISTRICT AT AUSTIN

ORDER ON MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL

On this day of , 20 , the 

Court considered the Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel of Tracy D. Cluck, 

Movant.

The Court finds that good cause exists for withdrawal of Movant as counsel.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Tracy D. Cluck is withdrawn as 

counsel of record for Appellant, Nicole Dawn Holland, and is hereby 

DISCHARGED from his representation of Appellant, Nicole Dawn Holland, in 

Cause No. 03-14-00577-CR.

SIGNED this day of , 20 .

_____________________________

JUDGE PRESIDING
Gryphon Gold Corporation: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





Exhibit 10.1


Amendment No. 4 to Option Agreement 


This Agreement is (i) Amendment No. 4 dated the 15th day of
June, 2010 to the Option Agreement (the "Option Agreement") entered into as of
the 5th day of March, 2010 between Sage Gold Inc. ("Sage"), Borealis
Mining Company ("BMC") and Gryphon Gold Corporation ("Gryphon"), as amended. 


WHEREAS: 


A.



Sage, BMC and Gryphon entered into the
Option Agreement, as amended, which provides in Section 2.1(b) thereof as
follows: "During the Option Period, the Parties will use best efforts to
negotiate the terms and conditions of the Joint Venture Agreement in accordance
with the Indicative Terms of the Joint Venture Agreement set out in Schedule F,
and agree to the form thereof as soon as reasonably practicable, but in no event
later than June 15, 2010, and either Party may terminate this Agreement if the
terms, conditions and form of the Joint Venture Agreement have not been agreed
to by June 15, 2010 (the "JV Agreement Condition")." 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged and upon and subject to the terms and conditions
hereafter set out, the parties agree as follows: 

1.

 Subject to Section 2
below, from and after the date hereof, Section 2.1(b) of the Option Agreement
shall be and it is hereby amended to read as follows: 

"During the Option Period, the
Parties will use best efforts to negotiate the terms and conditions of the Joint
Venture Agreement in accordance with the Indicative Terms of the Joint Venture
Agreement set out in Schedule F, and agree to the form thereof as soon as
reasonably practicable, but in no event later than July 15, 2010, and either
Party may terminate this Agreement if the terms, conditions and form of the
Joint Venture Agreement have not been agreed to by July 15, 2010 (the "JV
Agreement Condition")." 

2. 

This Amendment
No. 4 shall terminate and be of no effect if Sage shall not complete the
purchase of an aggregate of US$200,000 of Units in accordance with the
Subscription Agreement on or before June 16, 2010. 

3. 

All other terms and conditions
of the Option Agreement and Subscription Agreement remain unamended and in full
force and effect. 

This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
will be considered to be an original and together will constitute one and the
same document. 




- 2 - 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly executed this Agreement on date set
forth on the first page of this Agreement. 


SAGE GOLD
INC. 


By: __________________________________

Name: 

Title: 


BOREALIS
MINING COMPANY 


By: __________________________________

Name: 

Title: 


GRYPHON
GOLD CORPORATION 


By: __________________________________

Name: 

Title:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 27, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerJuly 29, 2008




25
The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern

1

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3725

___________

Robert A. Clem, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas

Constance Grayson, Attorney at Law, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 6, 1999

 Filed: January 21, 1999 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD

ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert A. Clem appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1

for the Eastern District of Arkansas dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. After

carefully reviewing the record, we conclude the district court did not err. Accordingly,

we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of United Retail Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended October 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), we, Raphael Benaroya, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and George R. Remeta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that based on our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                             | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/RAPHAEL BENAROYARaphael Benaroya
Chief Executive OfficerDecember 20, 2004 | 
|                                                                             | 
|/s/GEORGE R. REMETAGeorge R. Remeta
Chief Financial OfficerDecember 20, 2004 |
Molecular Structure for PMN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

SAMUEL A. SARVER, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-33

 

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent case)

Defendant.

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR AN AWARD 

UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”) (DOC. 21); AND (2) AWARDING 

EAJA FEES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,188.55

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ motion for an 

award of attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C.

§ 2412(d), in the total amount of $3,188.55. Doc. 21. There being no dispute that all requirements are met 

for the reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) GRANTS the parties’ motion (doc. 21); and (2) 

AWARDS EAJA fees, costs, and expenses in the amount of $3,188.55. As no further matters remain 

pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: September 17, 2018 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

CINCINNTAI, OHIO
CASI OSBORN, ET AL. * CASE NO. 1-18-298
(JUDGE BLACK)
PLAINTIFFS,
VS. * DISMISSAL ENTRY WITH
PREJUDICE
FOREST RIVER, INC.
DEFENDANT. *

It appearing to the Court that this action has been settled and compromised to the full
satisfaction of all parties hereto, this action and all claims filed herein by all parties are ORDERED
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the filing of a new action. Defendant Forest River to pay
court costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Timdtry 2. Rak

JUDGE TIMOTHX S. BLACK

/S/ Kevin C. Connell

Kevin C. Connell (0063817)

BRUNS, CONNELL, VOLLMAR & ARMSTRONG, LLC.
137 N. Main St., Suite 400

Dayton, OH 45402

Phone: (937) 999-6261/Fax: (937) 999-6290
kconnell@bevalaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Forest River, Inc.

/s/ Ronald L. Burdge

Ronald L. Burdge, Esq. (0015609)
Elizabeth Ahern Wells, Esq. (0078320)
8250 Washington Village Drive
Dayton, Ohio 45458
Tele.937.432.9500/Fax.937.432.9503

Ron@Burdgelaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs Casi Osborn and Jason Ebbing
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30484]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 10 a.m.-12 Noon.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: 
    Briefing Matter: Full-Sized and Nonfull-Sized Cribs--Final Rules.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 30, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30484 Filed 12-1-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 10 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the remains of the late United States 

3 Capitol Police Officer Brian D. Sicknick shall be per4 mitted to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol from 

5 February 2, 2021, through February 3, 2021, and the Ar6 chitect of the Capitol, under the direction of the Speaker 

7 of the House of Representatives and the President 
2 

•HCON 10 EH 

1 pro tempore of the Senate, shall take all necessary steps 

2 for the accomplishment of that purpose. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 10 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Permitting the remains of the late United States 

honor in the rotunda of the Capitol. Capitol Police Officer Brian D. Sicknick to lie in
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128292 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128292 

 COA: 259574 

Kalkaska CC: 02-002287-FH 

CARLTON JAMES RAPOZA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 17, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005 

Clerk
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report  included  in  this  Form  10-K,  into  the  Trust's   previously   filed
Registration  Statements on Forms S-8 and S-3: 1988  Non-Statutory  Stock Option
Plan, Share  Compensation Plan for Outside  Trustees,  1997 Incentive Plan (File
No.  333-57815)  and  Dividend  Reinvestment  Plan for  Shareholders  (File  No.
333-81763).




                                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Philadelphia, PA
March 26, 2001
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/S/    JOHN P.
BYRNESJohn P. ByrnesChief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare
Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/S/    PAUL G.
GABOSPaul G. GabosChief Financial OfficerAugust 13, 2002
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 13

- 00020

- CV
Edward BELL , Appellant

v. Deborah BELL , Appellee From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2003

- CI

- 18349 Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 13, 2013
DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On December 28 , 2012, appellant Edward Bell filed a notice of appeal from the trial
court’ s judgment signed November 7 , 2012. 1 The clerk’ s record was due January 7, 2013 , sixty days after the judgment was signed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1

. On January 8, 2013 , the District Clerk of Bexar County filed a notification stating the clerk’ s record would not be filed because appellant had not paid or mad e arrangements to pay the clerk’ s fee to prepare the record and is

1 A copy of the “Amended Order Granting Deborah Bell’s Motion to Dismiss and Denying Motion for Sanctions” attached to the Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Sanctions filed by appellee Deborah Bell on January 18, 2013 reflects that the order was signed on No vember 6, 2012, not November 7, 2012; regardless, the clerk’s record was due on January 7, 2013, the Monday following the expiration of sixty days. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.1(a).04

- 13

- 00020

- CV

- 2

- not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On January 16, 2013 , we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before January 28, 2013, that either (1) the clerk’ s fee has been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the clerk’ s fee; or (2) he is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’ s fee. We cautioned appellant that if he failed to respond within the time provided, his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not responded to our order. We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. See id

. We further order that appellee, Deborah Bell , recover her costs of this appeal from appellant. The Motion to
Dismiss and Motion for Sanctions file d by appellee Deborah Bell on January 18, 2013 is moot

.

PER CURIAM
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Ke’Mogena Yisrael, 

On behalf of minor child, T.D., 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:18cv410 

Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendant. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed 

by the Magistrate Judge on June 25, 2019 (Doc. 14). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file 

objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. 

Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R 

(Doc. 14) have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 14) of the Magistrate Judge is 

hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, 

substantial evidence exists to support the ALJ’s determination that TD was not disabled 

on or after May 1, 2014. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge 

United States District Court
Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW Document 145 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW Document 145 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:00-cr-00094-HJW Document 145 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 3 of 3