alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cost
Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President
of the Company and Thomas D. Willardson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Barry J. Feld                                                               
|Barry J. Feld                                                                   
|Chief Executive Officer and President                                           
|(Principal Executive Officer)                                                   
|                                                                                
|May 4, 2007                                                                     
|                                                                                
|/s/ Thomas D. Willardson                                                        
|Thomas D. Willardson                                                            
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
|                                                                                
|May 4, 2007
Order filed, January 09, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 13

- 00986

- CV

____________
INLAND AMERICAN RETA IL MANGAEMENT LLC, A DELWARE CORPORATION AS MANAG ING AGENT FOR MB TOM BALL TOWN CENTER LIMTED PARTNE RSHIP AND IN LAND AMERICAN RETAIL MANAGEMENT LLC, A DE LAWARE CORPORATION A S MANAGING AGENT FOR MB SPRING TOWN CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP , Appellant

V.

PAUL FRIEDMAN , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 91 9141



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 04, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record
has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.We order Gina Oliver , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.
PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

 COMMISSION,

Plaintiff

v.

STEPHEN G. DONAHUE, and

DONAHUE SECURITIES, INC.,

Defendants

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. C-1-01-116

(Judge Beckwith)

ORDER GRANTING SEVENTH MOTION

TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF FEES

AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

EXPENSES TO ULMER & BERNE LLP

This action comes before the Court on the Seventh Motion to Approve Payment of Fees 

and Reimbursement of Expenses to Receiver filed December 9, 2003 and the memorandum in 

support thereof and the pleadings and papers of record in this action.

The Court is of the opinion that said motion is well taken and should be granted and 

therefore it is hereby

ORDERED, that the motion is granted and payment by the Receiver of fees and 

reimbursement of expenses to Ulmer & Berne LLP for the period November 9, 2001 through 

March 29, 2002 as to the 401(k) plan termination matters and from June 1, 2003 through October 

31, 2003 as to all other matters in the amount of $16,028.00 and for reimbursement of expenses 

incurred during the same periods in the amount of $1,205.57 for a total of $17,233.57 is 

approved; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Receiver pay said total of $17,233.57 to Ulmer & Berne LLP out of 

funds in the hands of the Receiver as reported to the Court.

SO ORDERED.

______________________________

Sandra S. Beckwith

United States District Judge

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 99-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 1 of 2
2

Submitted by:

/s/ Richard Boydston

Richard Boydston (22360)

Attorney for Michael R. Barrett, Receiver

Ulmer & Berne LLP

600 Vine Street, Suite 2800

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-2409

(513) 762-6202

(513) 762-6245 (fax)

rboydston@ulmer.com

26950\00001 - 245834.1

12/9/2003 3:15 PM

Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 99-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 2 of 2
#### Reginald TRAVIS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 74-25

509 S.W. 2d 550

Opinion delivered May 28, 1974

*Harold L. Hall,*Public Defender, by: *Robert L. Lowery,*Dep. Public Defender, for appellant.

*641
      *Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *0. H. Hargraves,*Dep. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*Lee A. Munson,*Pros. Atty., *by. John Wesley Hall, Jr.,*Dep. Pros. Atty., amicus curiae.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

By this petition under Criminal Procedure Rule 1 the appellant seeks credit upon his 3-year prison sentence for the time he spent in the Pulaski County jail awaiting trial. The circuit judge denied relief.

Travis was confined to jail on December 2, 1970, and was charged with first-degree rape. He made no application to the court to set bail. His trial began on December 7, 1971. Upon the second day of trial the proceedings were terminated by a negotiated plea of guilty to assault with intent to commit rape, with a 3-year sentence. There was no request for the allowance of jail time until the present petition was filed.

The judgment must be affirmed upon the authority of *Smith*v. *State,*256 Ark. 425, 508 S.W. 2d 54 (1974). There, as here, the Rule 1 petitioner was charged with a capital offense, which was not bailable as a matter of right until the Supreme Court’s decision in *Furman*v. *Georgia,*408 U.S. 238, decided on June 29, 1972, which was after the Rule 1 petitioner’s trial in the *Smith*case, as in this one. There we said: “The filing of the information raised a presumption of appellant’s guilt for the purpose of arrest, detention and trial sufficient to preclude him from the right of bail until it was rebutted by an affirmative showing on his part.” We accordingly concluded that the petitioner had not shown a discriminatory denial of bail upon the basis of indigency alone. Since we cannot distinguish the *Smith*case from this one, it is a controlling precedent.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JOYCE JOHNSON, Administrator 

of the Estate of and on behalf of 

Jodie Coats, 

Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:18-cv-596 

 Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

 v. Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

 

RONETTE BURKES, et al., 

 Defendants. 

ORDER 

For good cause shown, Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Primary Expert Report 

Deadlines (ECF No. 50) is GRANTED. The Preliminary Pretrial Order (ECF No. 39) is 

MODIFIED as follows: 

EXPERT TESTIMONY 

Primary expert reports must be produced by JUNE 14, 2019. Rebuttal expert reports must be 

produced by JULY 15, 2019. If the expert is specifically retained, the reports must conform to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B), unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. If the expert is not 

specifically retained, the reports must conform to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C), unless otherwise 

agreed to by the parties. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(A), leave of court is not required to 

depose a testifying expert. 

All other deadlines in the Preliminary Pretrial Order (ECF No. 39) and Order (ECF No. 

45) remain the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: March 14, 2019 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers 

 ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case: 2:18-cv-00596-EAS-EPD Doc #: 51 Filed: 03/14/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 759
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 1825

_____________________________
E DWIN T ERRY W INFORD , Appellant,

v.

F RIEDMAN I NTEGRATED R EAL E STATE G ROUP , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Waddell A. Wallace, III , Judge

. September 22, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISS ED

. All pending motions are denied as moot.

R AY , J AY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Edwin Terry Winford, pro se
, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.
Exhibit 10.1





Amendment to Subscription Agreement





Amendment to Subscription Agreement dated as of January 12, 2011, by and between, Acorn Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) and Samuel Zentman (the “Investor”).





WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor have entered into a Subscription Agreement dated as of December 17, 2010 (the “Subscription Agreement”);





WHEREAS, pursuant to the Subscription Agreement, the Investor agreed to acquire 5,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Shares”) at a price of $3.50 per share (the “Purchase Price”);





WHEREAS, on December 21, 2010, the Investor tendered an aggregate of $17,500 to the Company in consideration for and against the issuance to the Investor of the Shares; and





WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor have agreed to amend the Subscription Agreement to increase the Purchase Price by $0.20 to $3.70 per share in order to comply with certain NASDAQ rules and certain interpretations of the NASDAQ staff of such rules.





NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:





1.           The Signature Page of the Subscription Agreement is hereby amended to state that the “Purchase Price Per Share” set forth thereon shall be $3.70 and the “Aggregate Purchase Price” set forth thereon shall be $18,500.





2.           Concurrent with the execution of this Amendment to Subscription Agreement, the Investor has delivered a check in the amount of $1,000 payable to the order of the Company representing the increase in the Aggregate Purchase Price from $17,500 to $18,500.





2           Except as amended hereby, the Subscription Agreement remains in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment to Subscription Agreement as of the date first written above.




ACORN ENERGY, INC.





By:Name:Title:





Samuel Zentman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

NINA PRIESTLEY, : Case No. 3:18-cv-00111
Plaintiff, : District Judge Walter H. Rice
: Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of
United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case was
originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been
filed and that the time for filing such objections, if any, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), has
expired, this Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on July 5, 2019
(Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full;

2. The Commissioner’s non-disability finding is vacated;

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security
Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for
payment of benefits; and

4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.


IT IS SO ORDERED.

B-2b-19 bu Gas
Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
EX-4.8







Exhibit 4.8




Consent of Michael M. Gustin




     I, Michael M. Gustin, hereby confirm that I have read those portions of the Notice of Meeting
and Management Information Circular of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. (“Aurora”), dated March 20,
2009 (the “Circular”) and relating to the special meeting of shareholders of Aurora to approve the
amalgamation of Aurora and 59801 Newfoundland & Labrador Inc., which Circular incorporates by
reference the annual information form of Fronteer Development Group Inc. (“Fronteer”) dated March
27, 2008 for its year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”), that directly pertain to the Technical
Reports (as defined in the following paragraph).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports in the AIF or other documents
incorporated by reference therein: (i) the technical report dated November 1, 2007 entitled
“Updated Technical Report, Sandman Gold Project, Humbolt County, Nevada, USA” prepared together
with George Lanier and Jim Ashton, (ii) the technical report dated May 31, 2007 entitled “Updated
Technical Report, Sandman Gold Project, Humboldt County, Nevada, USA” prepared together with George
Lanier and Jim Ashton, (iii) the technical report dated November 1, 2007 entitled “Updated
Technical Report Northumberland Project, Nye County, Nevada, USA” prepared together with George
Lanier and Steven Ristorcelli, and (iv) the technical report dated July 15, 2006 entitled
“Technical Report Northumberland Project, Nye County, Nevada, USA” prepared together with George
Lanier and Steven Ristorcelli (collectively, the “Technical Reports”). I further consent to the
inclusion in the Circular and Fronteer’s registration statement on Form F-8 relating to the
Circular filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration
Statement”) of the Technical Reports (through the inclusion by way of incorporation by reference of
the AIF in the Circular) and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Reports in the Circular
and the Registration Statement or any documents incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Reports and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Reports contained in the Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Reports
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Reports.



	 	 	 	 	 
	March 20, 2009

	 	(signed) Michael M. Gustin
 

Michael M. Gustin, R.P.Geo.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. JOEL ESPINOZA,

De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 16-50381

D.C . No. 3:16-c r-00664-LAB -1
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Larry A. B urns, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 13, 2017 ** B e fore : HUG, FAR

R IS, an d C ANB Y, C irc uit Judge s . Joe l Espinoz a

a ppe a ls from the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c h a l le nge s his 120-m onth se nte nc e for posse ssion with inte nt to distribute

m e tha m phe tam ine , in viola tion of 21 U.S.C . § 841(a). Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

a lifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Espinoz a ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for 

# F IL ED JUL 17 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c ord. Espinoz a ha s file d a pro se supple m e nt a l brie f. The Unite d State s ha s file d a m otion to dism

iss the
a ppe a l. Espinoz a ha s wa ive d the right to a

ppe a l his se nte nc e . B e c a

use the re c ord disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to theva lidity of the a ppe a l wa ive r, we dism iss the
a ppe a l. Se eUnite d State

s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). Howe ve r, the judgm e nt doe s not a c c urate ly re fle c t the sta tute of c onvic tion. W e re m and to thedistric t c ourt with instructions to c orre c t the judgm e nt to re fle c t that the c onvic tion is for a

viola tion of 21 U.S.C . § 841. S e eUnite d State

s v . He rre ra-Blanc o , 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th C ir. 2000) (re m anding sua sponteto
c orre c t the judgm e nt). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l is G RANT E D
. The m otion to dism

i s s the a p pe a l is G R

A NT E D
. DISM I SSE D ; RE M ANDE D to c orre c t the judgm e nt.

2
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 1 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2021 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of 

government. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article 

3 I of the Constitution, during the One Hundred Seven4 teenth Congress the Speaker of the House and the Major5 ity Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, act6 ing jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 

7 the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, may 

8 notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respec9 tively, to assemble at a place outside the District of CoVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:59 Feb 08, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC1.RDS HC1

ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 1 RDS 

1 lumbia if, in their opinion, the public interest shall war2 rant it. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 4, 

2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

KATELYNN MARIE COOPER, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No.: 2:18-cv-67

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

Magistrate Judge Vascura

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 

Defendant. 

 

ORDER

This case is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation issued by the

Magistrate Judge on December 3, 2018, recommending that the Court reverse the Commissioner

of Social Security’s non-disability finding and remand this case to the Commissioner and the

ALJ pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report

and Recommendation. (Doc. 17). The time for filing objections to the Report and

Recommendation has passed, and no objections have been filed to the Report and

Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS AND AFFIRMS the Report and

Recommendation. The Commissioner of Social Security’s nondisability finding is hereby

REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner and ALJ pursuant to Sentence

Four of § 405(g). 

The Clerk shall remove Document 17 from the Court’s pending motions list, enter final

judgment and remand this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Condensed 
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1997 (unaudited) and the 
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended 
September 30, 1997 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                           1,646
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                    3,580
<ALLOWANCES>                       464
<INVENTORY>                      3,218
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 9,978
<PP&E>                           1,412
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  22,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,828
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0 
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                            61
<OTHER-SE>                      20,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    22,839
<SALES>                         10,397
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                10,397
<CGS>                            5,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    5,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 (48)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    348
<INCOME-TAX>                       504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (156)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                      (156)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (.03)
        

</TABLE>
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3989 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study to determine the suitability and 

feasibility of adding the Heart Mountain Relocation Center, in the State of Wyoming, as a unit of the National 

Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3989 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Heart Mountain Relo3 cation Center Study Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall con6 duct a special resource study of the Heart Mountain Relo7 cation Center, in Park County, Wyoming. 

8 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub9 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

10 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

11 Heart Mountain Relocation Center and surrounding 

12 area; 

13 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

14 designating the Heart Mountain Relocation Center 

15 as a unit of the National Park System; 

16 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

17 protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, 

18 State, or local governmental entities, or private and 

19 nonprofit organizations; 

20 (4) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac21 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

22 maintenance associated with the alternatives; 

23 (5) identify any potential impacts of designation 

24 of the site as a unit of the National Park System 

25 on private landowners; and 
3 

•HR 3989 EH

1 (6) consult with interested Federal, State, or 

2 local governmental entities, federally recognized In3 dian tribes, private and nonprofit organizations, 

4 owners of private property that may be affected by 

5 any such designation, or any other interested indi6 viduals. 

7 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

8 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec9 tion 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5). 

10 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

11 on which funds are first made available for the study 

12 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

13 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep14 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

15 Resources of the Senate a report containing the results 

16 of the study and any conclusions and recommendations of 

17 the Secretary. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3989 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conoming, as a unit of the National Park System. Mountain Relocation Center, in the State of Wy- suitability and feasibility of adding the Heart duct a special resource study to determine the