alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB Doc #: 13 Filed: 05/24/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 84

Southern District of Ohio

OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE et al.

1:18-cv-00357

KASICH et al.

Governor John Kasich

Riffe Center, 30th Floor

77 S. High Street

Columbus, OH 43215-6117

Freda J. Levenson (0045916), Trial Attorney

ACLU of Ohio Foundation Inc.

4506 Chester Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44103

05/25/2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: E.B.I., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.B., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 503 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: B.I., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.B., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 504 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.I., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.B., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 505 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.B.I., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.B., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 506 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.B.I., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.B., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 507 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.I., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.B., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 508 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[503 EAL 2019, 504 EAL 2019, 505 EAL 2019, 506 EAL 2019, 507 EAL 2019 and 508 

EAL 2019] - 2

AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN GARRETT, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:18-cv-00692 

Judge Michael H. Watson

Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. 

Deavers

)

)

STEVE SNYDER-HILL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 )

Case No. 2:18-cv-00736 

Judge Michael H. Watson

Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. 

Deavers

)

 

SUGGESTION OF DEATH UPON THE RECORD

The Mass Plaintiffs (Snyder-Hill, et al.), by and through counsel, suggest upon the record, 

pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the death of John Doe 18 (case 

number 2:18-cv-00736) during the pendency of this action. 

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Scott E. Smith

SCOTT E. SMITH (0003749)

BRIAN R. NOETHLICH (0086933)

Scott Elliott Smith, LPA

5003 Horizons Drive, Suite 101

Columbus, Ohio 43220

Phone: 614.846.1700

Fax: 614.486.4987

E-Mail: ses@sestraillaw.com

E-Mail: brn@sestriallaw.com

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 87 Filed: 05/14/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 553
2

 /s/ Adele P. Kimmel

Adele P. Kimmel

(admitted pro hac vice) 

PUBLIC JUSTICE, P.C.

1620 L Street, NW, Suite 630

Washington, DC 20036

Phone: (202) 797-8600

Fax: (202) 232-7203

E-mail: akimmel@publicjustice.net

 /s/ Ilann M. Maazel 

Ilann M. Maazel

(Admitted pro hac vice)

Debra L. Greenberger 

(Admitted pro hac vice)

EMERY CELLI BRINCKERHOFF

 & ABADY LLP

600 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10020

Phone: (212) 763-5000

Fax: (212) 763-5001

E-Mail: imaazel@ecbalaw.com

E-Mail: dgreenberger@ecbalaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of this document was served by the Court’s ECF System on all counsel of record

on May 14, 2019, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E).

A copy of this document was also served via certified mail on the spouse of John Doe 18

on May 14, 2019, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1).

 /s/ Scott E. Smith

SCOTT E. SMITH (0003749)

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 87 Filed: 05/14/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 554
#### State of Arkansas vs. Johnson.

Iítdictjieot : *Endorsemnnt of the names of witnesses on.*

The omission to endorse the names of witnesses examined before the Grand Jury, on an indictment at the time it is found, is no cause for quashing the indictment.

*175APPEAL from *Jefferson*Circuit Court.

Hon. J. A. WilliaMS, Circuit Judge.

*Henderson, Attorney General, Met. L. Jones*and *Thos. B. Martin,*for appellant.

ENGLISH Ch. J.:

Anthony Johnson was indicted in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County for a misdemeanor (extortion) in the office of Constable. He moved to set aside the indictment because the names of the witnesses who were examined before the Grand Jury were not written at the foot of, or on the indictment, as required by the Statute. The Court sustained the motion, and the State appealed.

The practice in England was to endorse the names of the witnesses intended to be examined before the Grand Jury, upon the .bill when it was prepared, aud the witnesses so endorsed were sworn in open court, and the bill, with the names of the witnesses upon it, was sent to the Grand Jury, and the witnesses were called before them, and examined. 1 Arch. Cr. Pr. and PL, 98.

Here, the foreman is empowered to administer oaths *j¡p*witnesses appearing before the Grand Jury (Gantt’s Digest, Sec. 1758) and when the indictment is found, the names of all witnesses who were examined must be written at the foot of, or on the indictment. Ib., Sec. 1778.

In our practice the putting of the names of the witnesses who were examined before the Grand Jury on the indictment, serves several useful purposes : It furnishes information to the Clerk in issuing subpoenas for the State ; to the Prosecuting Attorney in calling witnesses at the trial, and it advises the accused of the names of the witnesses upon whose testimony the indictment was found, which may be important to him in preparing for trial.

*176The statute should not, therefore, be disregarded, but should be complied with.

But the names of the witnesses are not part of the indictment, and it has been held in Iowa that they are not part of the record, and need not be transcribed in making out a transcript of the record for the Supreme Court on writ of error. *Harriman*v. *The State,*2 Green, 284.

Mr. Wharton says: ‘ ‘ The practice is for the Attorney General (in Penn.) or, in Englrnd, the Clerk of the Assizes, to mark on the back of each bill the witnesses belonging to it; though it has been held that the omission is not fatal. 1 Wharton, American, Cr. L., Sec. 478.

Our opinion is, that the failure to put the names of the witnesses examined before the Grand Jury upon the indictment at the time it is found, is not cause for setting aside or quashing the indictment. But as it may be important for defendant, in preparing for trial, to know the names of the witnesses on whose testimony the indictment was found, the court should, on his application, require a list of the witnesses to be furnished him.

*Sea Commonwealth*v. *Knapp,*9 Pickering, 497.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to the court below, to require the appellee to plead to the indictment, etc.
Section 33-15-04-01 33-15-04-02 CHAPTER 33-15-04 OPEN BURNING RESTRICTIONS Refuse Burning Restrictions Permissible Open Burning 33-15-04-02. Permissible open burning.2. The following conditions applyto all types ofpermissible burning listed in subsection 1. a. Airpollution, as defined in section 33-15-01-04,will notbe created. 

### 2History: Amended effective October 1, 1987; January 1, 1989; January 1, 1996; January 1, 2007; April 1, 2014. General Authority: NDCC 23-25-03, 28-32-02 Law Implemented: NDCC 23-25-03



### 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TAKEEA TRAMMELL, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3: 18cr67(7) 

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE 

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR 

EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO 

RENEW AL ON OR AFTER MAY 1, 2022 

Defendant's request for early termination of supervision, filed April 30, 2021 , is 

OVERRULED at this time, pursuant to a review of both the Presentence Investigation and 18 

U.S.C. §3553(a)(l-7), without prejudice to renewal on or after May 1, 2022. 

On May 1, 2022, Defendant will have served some five weeks short of three years of her 

five-year term of probation. In this Court's opinion, should her performance continue to be 

satisfactory, a term of probation of some five weeks short of three years will be a sufficient term 

but no more than needed to carry out the purposes of her probationary disposition. 

February 1, 2022 WALTER H. RICE 

UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 3:18-cr-00067-WHR Doc #: 188 Filed: 02/01/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 719
Copies to: 

Counsel of record 

Laura Sebulsky, Probation Officer 

U.S. Marshal 

2 

Case: 3:18-cr-00067-WHR Doc #: 188 Filed: 02/01/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 720
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 3:17cr183(2) 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JORDAN BROOKE SMITH, JUDGE WALTER B . RICE 

Defendant. 

ENTRY RELEASING DEFENDANT FROM CUSTODY TO REPORT TO 

WOMEN'S BEHAVIORAL CENTER FOR INPATIENT TREATMENT 

Defendant Jordan Brooke Smith is to be released from Montgomery County Jail on 

Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 11 :00 a.m. Defendant is to be transported by her mother, Jodi 

Riley, directly to Women's Behavioral Center for inpatient residential treatment. Upon release 

from inpatient treatment, defendant shall immediately report to her probation officer, Laura 

Sebulsky. 

March 23, 2021 

cc: Counsel of record 

United States Marshals Office 

Laura Sebulsky 

WALTER H. RICE 

UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 3:17-cr-00183-WHR Doc #: 185 Filed: 03/24/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1129
EXHIBIT 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We  have  issued  our  reports dated March 1, 2006 accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements  and  management's  assessment  of  the  effectiveness  of
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  included  in the Annual Report of
P.A.M.  Transportation  Services,  Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31,  2005.  We  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports
in  the  Registration  Statement of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-80505, effective June 11, 1999).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON, LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
March 1, 2006


                                      -64-
<PAGE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

CRAIG A. THOMPSON,

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:18-cv-117

- vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

CHAE HARRIS, Warden,

 Warren Correctional Institution

:

Respondent.

ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND REINSTATING CASE

This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to Strike and Reinstate 

Habeas Petition (ECF No. 58).

On February 5, 2020, the Clerk docketed a Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition1 which was 

purportedly signed by Petitioner and served on Respondent on January 27, 2020 (ECF No. 55). 

Because the dismissal was supposedly voluntary, it was within the decisional authority of the 

Magistrate Judge under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and was granted (ECF Nos. 56, 57). 

Petitioner now represents to the Court that he did not sign or cause to be filed the Motion 

for dismissal. Instead he claims it was fraudulently signed and served by another inmate whom he 

names and says should be prosecuted. Because this Court has only Petitioner’s identification of 

the other inmate and no resources with which to investigate that claim, the Court suggests 

Petitioner should filed a complaint about the fraud with the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and 

 1 The document bears the case number 3:18-cv-1170 which is not a number ever assigned to a case in this Court. The 

Clerk docketed it in this case.
2

Corrections.

To the extent Petitioner disclaims any intent to dismiss the Petition, the Court can easily 

correct the harm. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60, both the Magistrate Judge’s Decision 

and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 56) and the Clekr’s Judgment carrying out that 

Order (ECF No. 57) are VACATED. and this case is ordered reinstated on the active docket of this 

Court.

On January 2, 2020, prior to receipt of the spurious Motion to Dismiss, the Magistrate 

Judge had entered an Analysis of the Current Status of this Case which found the case was not ripe 

for decision because of the reported pendency of a motion for reconsideration in the Second 

District Court of Appeals and possible subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio (ECF No.

54). The Magistrate Judge has confirmed that a motion for reconsideration is in fact pending

before the Second District Court of Appeals as of the date of this Order.2

 Accordingly, the status 

of the case remains as noted in the Analysis: stayed pending the finality of Petitioner’s currently 

pending appeal. The Court’s prior Order for Status Reports remains in effect.

February 25, 2020.

 s/ Michael R. Merz

 United States Magistrate Judge

 2 www.clerk.co.montgomery.oh.us, visted February 25, 2020.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 63 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 63

   Permitting the remains of the late Honorable Robert Joseph Dole, 
 formerly a Senator and a Representative from the State of Kansas, to 
  lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2021

   Mr. Estes (for himself, Mr. Mann, and Mr. LaTurner) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Permitting the remains of the late Honorable Robert Joseph Dole, 
 formerly a Senator and a Representative from the State of Kansas, to 
  lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING THE LATE ROBERT JOSEPH DOLE.

    (a) Permitting Remains To Lie in Honor in Rotunda of Capitol.--In 
recognition of the long and distinguished service rendered to the 
Nation by the Honorable Robert Joseph Dole, formerly a Senator and a 
Representative from the State of Kansas, his remains shall be permitted 
to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol on December 9, 2021, and 
the Architect of the Capitol, under the direction of the President pro 
tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, 
shall take all necessary steps for the accomplishment of that purpose.
    (b) Use of Catafalque.--The Architect of the Capitol is authorized 
and directed to transfer the catafalque which is situated in the 
Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center to the rotunda of the 
Capitol so that such catafalque may be used in connection with services 
to be conducted there for the Honorable Robert Joseph Dole, formerly a 
Senator and a Representative from the State of Kansas.
                                 <all>
```
# ( An **nuthori~y** to **con~t=uct** or **pe~it** to operate shallnot be transferable, whetl-.er **b~·** ope::-ntion of law or other-.·ize, either fro1:1 cne loclltio::. toanother, fro:.1 c.:e piece ofe'iuipe1ent to a:1other, or froc cne **per~:;on** to another.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached
as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the
Report.
  By:
    /s/ Alberto R. Santa InesAlberto R. Santa InesChief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance
AO 245D (Rev. 09/19) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations 

Sheet 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Southern District of Ohio 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

V. 

Michael Livingston 

THE DEFENDANT: 

) JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

(For Revocation of Probation or Supervised Release) 

Case No. 1:18cr067-4 

USM No. 77619-061 

Ste hanie Kessler, Es 

Defendant's Attorney 

~ admitted guilt to violation ofcondition(s) ~ s~ee~ b~e~lo~w _______ of the term of supervision. 

D was found in violation of condition(s) count(s) after denial of guilt. 

The defendant is adjudicated guilty of these violations: 

Violation Number Nature of Violation 

1 Unlawful use of a controlled substance 

Violation Ended 

01/10/2022 

The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through __ 2 __ of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to 

the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. 

D The defendant has not violated condition(s) _______ and is discharged as to such violation(s) condition. 

It is ordered that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address untD all fmes, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are 

fully pai_d. Jf ordered to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of material changes m economic crrcumstances. 

Last Four Digits of Defendant's Soc. Sec. No.: 2042 05/04/2022 

Defendant's Year of Birth: 1968 

City and State of Defendant's Residence: Signature 

~ of Judge 

Cincinnati, OH 

Michael R. Barrett, United States District Judge 

Name and Title of Judge 

§~ ~ _ 'h:l _ r2-_ - r-r~ r · Date 

Case: 1:18-cr-00067-MRB Doc #: 147 Filed: 05/06/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 465
AO 245D (Rev. 09/19) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations 

Sheet 2-Imprisonment 

DEFENDANT: Michael Livingston 

CASE NUMBER: 1:18cr067-4 

IMPRISONMENT 

Judgment - Page 2 of 

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total 

term of: 

Thirty (30) days BOP custody 

D The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: 

D The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal. 

li'l' The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district: 

~ at 12:00 D a.m. ~ p.m. on 05/16/2022 ------

D as notified by the United States Marshal. 

D The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons: 

D before 2 p.m. on _ 

D as notified by the United States Marshal. 

D as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office. 

RETURN 

I have executed this judgment as follows: 

Defendant delivered on 

at 

to 

with a certified copy of this judgment. 

By __ _ 

UNITED STA TES MARSHAL 

DEPUTY UNITED ST ATES MARSHAL 

2 

Case: 1:18-cr-00067-MRB Doc #: 147 Filed: 05/06/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 466
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Consolidated  Balance Sheets and Consolidated  Statements of Operations found on
pages 2  through  5 of the  Company's  Form  10-Q for the  year-to-date,  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000882261
<NAME>                                         Financial Data Schedule
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     0
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         13,849
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  95,879
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         38,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 818,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       164
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   818,340
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               78,034
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,888
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
f^kl_ LOQVX Lh$£. 00. * \>tb^- MZO£ZO& ^ECEIVED^ ^OTlo^ TO Co^eL. 

### £©tf\£S fceOj "?A-TeicJC&Eft>JeVf ^5>elU-)-V CU,^ a*s^J-(oUy A-sU -U- Cou/-V to OCTO4Z016 THIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS,

s 

### *jst~Uk* lwV\.A^ w-a-^1 WW.VUO 4rrc;V „oAoL* 1^.1 W**-S -tUi ^ *CUOS-ei ^^1- KuW*>A f*^_,fc, 

### JU, -\^ j^w c^l^r o^ ^v^^*- tV^"^^ ft^' ^f^ r^sV" ^A \l

^ WlUU j^lp rtP 0>PaP>u ^i Mol\f?> POP- pg^ \^^ to»c>^inp

### DttU- HoV'V^tJt Uur-t v^Uit iuVy U ^^of^v W^lU^ tUift/1
^ te>oA ot ftwJs ttV.vl b^Wut^ T0l«>. ^V:^ sUvTU. ^-^1LNrf o-r T^X^S (wl "W>/ sLe>C> fywA 1L*. SWb- «LxL K>o\ U\oZ> St-itoLAtb. ^tJOeilAoV {U*9UA*^ "tLa***- ilfcov«fi^^ ^o lee- iv»»»L_ D>aA o\ A^kAVft.'tjL. <£*~^£>r»L, 3ST. (\Y\>«^WwO^ Wrt> V^-QO-eVTeA Lfi>t*f^ AteteHucU.!. Coo^»t«JL ^O(i»0<V»>t~X=> ftA'tA- <vs.V-^ "VU1*> C^xx-^ Ao uAtefw_ ¥>>^<\V*vj"V &\ £ ,i.V»c.v> 

### J^=. Co«a>JL "VU. ^«*A o&v«As. 0\ tU Trvvo\s.tr>opW, HoV VvWu> 

## LouA- jLAo JvW IA4 I.UU f^*Xw^ lArfro^fr^

t»Boasafcg> ^sxjLuft&vup^ GvC^-uV-i ©^ ^ ^ A«w o^ Sfc^Je^W^ V >> -\L4_V<2eMf 2-CHCp < 

## <tftfe4UW^^»~i - f»^ALx
Ov^V^ ^ft*^»W^A 

### Jr*W> ta^ CJiuVN



### W*> We6^ --**DtiwU^ ^ T^ V^l^"f «*>^lu^lAc-4. \-2SK-[u feE . '•. -OVACo-.oO Clo -CtL


## M 4 .few. A. io 

### #&*&>---T&---*&&ZM %>&&><*

tw ^RECEIVED\ OCT 04 2016 THRDCOURJOF APPEALS, V JEFFREYaKYLE / 

### &\\v\&& 

### A^, ^*v woo•si a) i w in -si -.1 

### r -3 o 

### * 

# ^ v •> ? ^ v 

### f- S*
-£ —J

H E^ R!T'