alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection  with the Quarterly Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on  Form 10-QSB for the three months ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard  Gagne, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: January 15, 2005

| /s/ Richard Gagne                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Richard Gagne, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal        Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial        Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (144)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   752
<PP&E>                                           3,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,607)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,291
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,244
<SALES>                                         14,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,782
<CGS>                                            8,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,720
<INCOME-TAX>                                        70
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,690
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    472
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,122
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

BETTY J. FANNIN, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 Civil Action 2:18-cv-418 

 v. Judge George C. Smith 

 Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura 

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion for Remand 

to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 

(ECF No. 12). Per the parties’ agreement, on remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all 

findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision, and the Commissioner will conduct further 

proceedings and develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is 

disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED 

to the Commissioner and the ALJ under Sentence Four of § 405(g) for further proceedings. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/George C. Smith ______ 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Exhibit 21.1





SUBSIDIARIES





Name of Subsidiary

JurisdictionJ.D. Edwards World Solutions Company

ColoradoJ.D. Edwards World Source Company

ColoradoJ.D. Edwards Holdings Inc.

ColoradoHornet Acquisition Company

ColoradoJ.D. Edwards Australia Pty. Ltd.

AustraliaJ.D. Edwards & Company Foreign Sales, Inc.

BarbadosJ.D. Edwards Belgium N.V./S.A.

BelgiumJ.D. Edwards Brasil Limitada

BrazilJ.D. Edwards Canada Ltd.

CanadaJ.D. Edwards France SA

FranceJ.D. Edwards Deutschland GmbH

GermanyJ.D. Edwards (Hong Kong) Limited

Hong KongJ.D. Edwards Europe Ltd.

IrelandJ.D. Edwards Italia S.p.A.

ItalyJ.D. Edwards (Japan) K.K.

JapanJ.D. Edwards de Mexico y Compania S. en N.C. de C.V.

MexicoJ.D. Edwards New Zealand Ltd.

New ZealandJ.D. Edwards India Software Pvt. Ltd.

IndiaJ.D. Edwards International B.V.

NetherlandsJ.D. Edwards Netherlands B.V.

NetherlandsJ.D. Edwards (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeJ.D. Edwards S.A. (Proprietary) Limited

South AfricaJ.D. Edwards (Korea), Inc.

South KoreaJ.D. Edwards España S.L.

SpainJ.D. Edwards Nordic A.B.

SwedenJ.D. Edwards (Schweiz) AG

SwitzerlandJ.D. Edwards (Taiwan) Pte. Ltd.

TaiwanJ.D. Edwards (U.K.) Ltd.

United KingdomJ.D. Edwards Nova Scotia Company

Nova ScotiaJ.D. Edwards Numetrix Company

Nova ScotiaNumetrix, Inc.

ConnecticutNumetrix B.V.

NetherlandsNumetrix Asia Pte. Ltd.

SingaporePerfect Business Consulting S.L.

SpainWorld Technology Services, Inc. (J.D. Edwards & Company is a 50% owner)

WashingtonYOUcentric, Inc.

North CarolinaYOUcentric Ltd.

United KingdomYOUcentric EURL

FranceYOUcentric GmbH

Germany
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 50 

Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations in the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself and Mr. BLUNT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations 

in the Senate. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF NOMINATIONS. 

3 (a) LIMIT ON CONSIDERATION FOR CERTAIN NOMI4 NATIONS.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—If cloture is invoked on a 

6 nomination described in paragraph (2), there shall 

7 be no more than 2 hours of post-cloture consider8 ation equally divided between the majority leader 

9 and the minority leader, or their designees. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 50 IS 

1 (2) NOMINATIONS COVERED.—A nomination 

2 described in this paragraph is a nomination of an in3 dividual to a position— 

4 (A) as a judge of a district court of the 

5 United States or of the United States Court of 

6 Federal Claims; or 

7 (B) in the executive branch that is not— 

8 (i) a position at level I of the Execu9 tive Schedule under section 5312 of title 5, 

10 United States Code; or 

11 (ii) a position as a member of— 

12 (I) the Equal Employment Op13 portunity Commission; 

14 (II) the Securities and Exchange 

15 Commission; 

16 (III) the Federal Election Com17 mission; 

18 (IV) the Federal Energy Regu19 latory Commission; 

20 (V) the Federal Trade Commis21 sion; 

22 (VI) the National Labor Rela23 tions Board; 

24 (VII) the Commodity Futures 

25 Trading Commission; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 50 IS 

1 (VIII) the Consumer Product 

2 Safety Commission; 

3 (IX) the Federal Communica4 tions Commission; 

5 (X) the Surface Transportation 

6 Board; 

7 (XI) the Nuclear Regulatory 

8 Commission; 

9 (XII) the Federal Deposit Insur10 ance Corporation; or 

11 (XIII) the Board of Governors of 

12 the Federal Reserve System. 

13 (b) DIVISION OF TIME ON OTHER NOMINATIONS.— 

14 If cloture is invoked on a nomination that is not described 

15 in subsection (a)(2), the period of post-cloture consider16 ation shall be equally divided between the majority leader 

17 and the minority leader, or their designees. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0831

November 13, 2014

The contents of the following dockets are hereby in corporated by reference into and are considered to be included in, contained in and to h ave been placed in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR2014-0831 (Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Petrole um and Natural Gas Systems 2015 Revisions):

1) EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508 (Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Repo rting) 2) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923 (Oil and Natural Gas Systems) 3) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0924 (Determination of Confidential Business Information) 4) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0925 (Corporate Parent and NAICS Co de in the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule) 5) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0926 (Carbon Dioxide Injection and Geologic Sequestration) 6) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0927 (Additional Sources of Fluorin ated Gases) 7) EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0929 (Change to the Reporting Date for Certain Data Elements Required Under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhous e Gases Rule) 8) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0147 (Minor Technical Corrections a nd Amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rules) 9) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0417 (Mandatory Reporting of Greenh ouse Gases: Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems, Subpart W: Extension of 2011 BAMM Deadlines) 10) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0512 (Technical Revisions for Subpa rt I and W of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule)

Accessing dockets: Publicly available docket materials are available e ither electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the A ir Docket, EPA/DC, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excl uding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7103

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH ANDREW SADLER, Defendant- Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-160, CA-01-2192-6-20) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Andrew Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Frank McDonald, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Joseph Andrew Sadler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sadler , Nos. CR-930-60; CA01-2192-6-20 (D.S.C. May 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of HF Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DarrelL. Posegate, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |  /s/ Darrel L. Posegate                                            |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Darrel L. Posegate,  Executive Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer |
|   | and Treasurer                                                           |
|   |                                                                    |
|   | Date:                                                                   |    November 14,  2008 |

 

----

*                                         A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to HF Financial Corp.and will be retained by HF Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
### SERVED: November 16, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

### DEPARTMENT OF WASHINGTON, DC 

### TRANSPORTATIO

**201~** 

### NOV 

## 11 A I: 5q In The Matter Of: DocketNo.



## FAA-2 **J\q~l)~l** OPERATIO NS Pacific International Skydiving Center ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2014WP130012 Respondent


### ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS On July 1, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued an Order Finalizing Litigation Schedule inthe above captioned case, requiring that any subpoenarequests be submitted to the undersigned judge no later than November 14, 2016. OnNovember 12, 2016, the Respondent filed a request for subpoenas for ten witnesses. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R. § 13.205(a)(3), 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1) The Respondent's request for subpoenas is granted. 2) The individual subpoenas are attached for the Respondent's counsel to serve.



# ~~---- DOUGLAS M. RAWALD Administrative Law Judge
Attachments: 1. Service List 2. Subpoenas

### SERVICE LIST

- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1


### ONE COPY Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel P.O. Box 387 Tavares, FL 32778 Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 8900 SW 107th Avenue, Suite 203 Miami, FL 33176 TEL: 305-598-4841 FAX: 305-598-4842 Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 Federal AviationAdministration Western-Pacific Region P. 

### 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAJ<: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAJ<: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-1116 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached
as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the
Report.
  By:
    /s/ Clinton H. SeversonClinton H. SeversonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending April 3, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerMay 5, 2009




23
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Tamara Brown, et al., : Case No. 1:18-cv-00412

:

Plaintiffs, : McFarland, J.

: Litkovitz, M.J.

vs. :

: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

City of Cincinnati, Ohio, et al., TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS

 Defendants.

:

:

:

Plaintiffs hereby request an additional 30 days, until August 27, 2020, to file objections to 

the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate issued on July 15, 2020. Plaintiffs’ counsel 

requires additional time due to the length and complexity of the Complaint and the Report and 

Recommendation. No party will be prejudiced by the extension and the request is being made in 

good faith.

Respectfully submitted

/s/ Robert J. Thumann

Robert J. Thumann (0074975)

Crehan & Thumann, LLC

404 E 12th Street, Second Floor

Cincinnati OH 45202

Office 513-381-5050

Fax 513-381-1700

Co-counsel for Plaintiffs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed using the Court’s 

CM/ECF electronic filing system, which will send notification to all counsel of record registered 

with the Court’s filing system, on this the 28th day of July, 2018.

/s/ Robert J. Thumann

Robert J. Thumann (0074975)

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 51 Filed: 07/28/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 653
#### Crowly *v.*Thornbrough, Comm’r. of Labor.

5-998

291 S. W. 2d 500

Opinion delivered June 18, 1956.

*Mehaffy, Smith*and *Williams*and *B. S. Clark,*for appellant.

Appellee *pro se.*

*Tom Gentry,*Attorney G-eneral and *Boy Finch, Jr.,*Asst. Atty. General for Intervenor.

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint without any further action by the trial court. It is not a final and appealable order, and the appeal must therefore be dismissed as premature. It is so ordered. See *Atkins*v. *Graham,*99 Ark. 496, 138 S. W. 878 and other cases cited in *Arkansas State Board of Architects*v. *Larsen,*ante page 536, 291 S. W. 2d 269.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2589

_____________________________

DAVID CHALLENDER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

January 30, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

David Challender, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LINCARE HOLDINGS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,660
<INVENTORY>                                      3,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,952
<PP&E>                                         300,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 685,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,156
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           584
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   685,997
<SALES>                                        429,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               429,353
<CGS>                                           66,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               239,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,152
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                    45,755
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,334
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26


</TABLE>
August 11, 2015

FFA Petition of Exemption I am requesting a petition of exemption to fly an unmanned Inspire 1 drone to conduct aerial photography and videography for the education of real estate professionals, real estate marketing and professional cinema and/or television productions. We choose the Inspire 1 because the monitor shows altitude to allow us to fly under 200 feet at all times. The Inspire 1 weighs under 10 pounds and will be flown during daylight hours and only under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) and within visual line of sight (VLOS). We will also maintain the safe distance required from N o Flight Zones such as airports and follow all FFA regulations regarding unmanned aircraft. By incorporation aerial footage into our videos, our productions will be enhanced, giving the viewer a prof essional product. I have been in the video production field for over 30 years. Thank you for your consideration.

Joe McMakin