alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Retention Bonus Agreement



 Exhibit 10.13.1 
 RETENTION BONUS AGREEMENT 
 (For all selected Employees other than members of the Bank’s
Management Committee) 
 This RETENTION BONUS AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 1st day of May,
2007 (the “Effective Date”) by and between the FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CHICAGO (the “Bank”), and [NAME OF EMPLOYEE] (the “Employee”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. The Employee is a valued and valuable member of the
workforce of the Bank. 
 B. The Bank recognizes that an organizational change at the Bank may cause uncertainty of employment which
uncertainty may result in the loss of the valuable services of the Employee. 
 C. The Bank desires to continue to employ the Employee
through the date of any organizational change and the Employee is willing to continue such employment. 
 D. The Employee has been selected
as a Participant in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago Employee Retention Plan (the “Plan”) and the execution of this Agreement is a condition to the Employee’s receipt of certain benefits under the Plan. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, it is covenanted and agreed by and between the
parties hereto as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 
 1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the respective meanings given to such terms in the Plan. 
 2. Position and Duties. The Employee hereby agrees to remain in the employ of the Bank throughout the Retention Period in his or her current capacity. During the period of the Employee’s employment
hereunder, the Employee shall devote his or her best efforts and full business time, energy, skills and attention to the business and affairs of the Bank. 
 3. Retention Bonus Payment; Compensation and Benefits. The Employee shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to [AMOUNT OF BONUS PAYMENT], pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Plan. 
  

 Form of Retention Bonus Agreement 








 4. Governing Law This Agreement shall be construed and the legal relations of the parties hereto shall be
determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois without regard to the law regarding conflicts of law. 
 5. Amendment. This
Agreement may not be amended or modified except by written agreement signed by the Employee and the Bank. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. 
  

									
	FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF CHICAGO	 		 	EMPLOYEE
					
	By:	 	  
	 		 	By:	 	  

	Name	 	[PRESIDENT]	 		 	Name:	 	: [NAME OF EMPLOYEE]
	Title:	 	President and CEO	 		 	Title:	 	[TITLE OF EMPLOYEE]

  

 Form of Retention Bonus Agreement
EXHIBIT J 

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 183-11 Filed: 01/28/19 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #:

10906
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 183-11 Filed: 01/28/19 Page: 2 of 5 PAGEID #:

10907
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 183-11 Filed: 01/28/19 Page: 3 of 5 PAGEID #:

10908
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 183-11 Filed: 01/28/19 Page: 4 of 5 PAGEID #:

10909
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 183-11 Filed: 01/28/19 Page: 5 of 5 PAGEID #:

10910
SCWC-12-0000645 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

HANNAH HARRISON, Respondent/Petitioner/Appellant/Appellant,

vs. GORDON I. ITO, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS,

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Respondent/Appellee-Appellee, and EVERCARE, Petitioner/Respondent/Appellee-Appellee. (SCWC-12-0000645; CAAP-12-0000645; CIV. NO. 11-1-2903; HER-11-156920)

---------------------------------------------------------------- JENIVIE DELOS REYES, FRANKLIN BIDDINGER, FLOYD HAYES,

JOHN VILLANUEVA, and TEHINE AVILLA, Respondents/Petitioners/Appellants-Cross-Appellees/Appellants,

vs. GORDON I. ITO, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS,

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Respondent/Appellee-Appellee, and EVERCARE, Petitioner/Respondent/Appellee-Cross-Appellant/Appellee.

(SCWC-12-0000646; CAAP-12-0000646; CIV. NO. 11-1-2553; HER-11-156817, 11-156241, 11-156361, 11-156251 & 11-155841)

---------------------------------------------------------------- Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000645 24-NOV-2015 10:37 AMAUDREY DELOS SANTOS, Respondent/Petitioner/Appellant/Appellant,

vs. GORDON I. ITO, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS,

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Respondent/Appellee-Appellee, and EVERCARE, Petitioner/Respondent/Appellee-Appellee. (SCWC-12-0000647; CAAP-12-0000647; CIV. NO. 11-1-2542; HER-10-154685)

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )

Petitioner’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on October 15, 2015, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, November 24, 2015. Dianne Winter Brookins and Morgan Early for petitioner Rafael G. Del Castillo for respondents Hannah Harrison, Jenivie Delos Reyes, Franklin Biddinger, Floyd Hayes, John Villanueva, Tehine Avilla and Audrey Delos Santos /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:18-cr-18 (2)

Judge Marbley

Carlos Mariel-Corona 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 36) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The Court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: June 4, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 6453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2586]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, February 9, 2011; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: February 1, 2011.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-2586 Filed 2-2-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,928,868
<SECURITIES>                                 1,794,581
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,307,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                   317,547
<INVENTORY>                                  3,913,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,439,997
<PP&E>                                      14,584,636
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,941,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,594,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,506,665
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       153,719
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,933,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,594,329
<SALES>                                     49,523,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,523,619
<CGS>                                       20,917,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,917,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,444,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               130,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,086,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,081,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,005,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,005,081
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











We, each hereby certify to the best of
our knowledge that the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of Gateway Tax Credit Fund
III, Ltd. for the period ended December 31, 2009 containing the financial
statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Gateway.








/s/ Ronald M.
      Diner
              Ronald
      M. Diner
              President
              Raymond
      James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
              (the
      Managing General Partner)
              February
      12, 2010/s/ Toni S.
      Matthews
              Toni
      S. Matthews
              Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer
              Raymond
      James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
              (the
      Managing General Partner)
              February
      12, 2010
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : Case No. 2:18-CR-00147

BILAL EL YOUSSEPH, : Judge James L. Graham

Defendant. :

:

REQUEST OF DEFENDANT BILAL EL YOUSSEPH FOR NOTICE OF INTENTION 

TO USE EVIDENCE

Defendant Bilal El Yousseph, by and through counsel, hereby requests notice pursuant to 

Rule 12 (d) (2) F.R.Cr.P. of the Government's intention to use in its case in chief at trial any evidence 

which the Defendant may be entitled to discover under Rule 16, in order to afford the Defendant an 

opportunity to move to suppress evidence under Subdivision (B) (3) of Rule 12 F.R.Cr.P.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Andrew Sanderson___________

Andrew Sanderson, #0066327

Attorney for the Defendant

BURKETT & SANDERSON, Inc.

73 North Sixth Street

Newark, Ohio 43055

(740) 345-0417

(740) 345-6677 – Fax

Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 19 Filed: 08/30/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 32
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify a copy of the foregoing was duly served upon the Office of the United States 

Attorney, 303 Marconi Boulevard, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43215, by electronic transmission on 

this 30th day of August, 2018. 

/s/ Andrew Sanderson___________

Andrew Sanderson, #0066327

Attorney for Defendant 

Case: 2:18-cr-00147-JLG Doc #: 19 Filed: 08/30/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 33
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7416

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM COLUMBUS SMITH, a/k/a Smitty,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-92-46-N, CA-97-225-2)

Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: April 7, 1998

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Columbus Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-92-46-N; CA-97-225-2 (E.D.

Va. Sept. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,845
<INVENTORY>                                      1,867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,231
<PP&E>                                         198,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 468,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,098
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           289
<OTHER-SE>                                     418,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   468,054
<SALES>                                        111,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,904
<CGS>                                           18,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,343
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,178
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,178
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 84 Filed 11/16/2004 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 84 Filed 11/16/2004 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 84 Filed 11/16/2004 Page 3 of 3
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

4/9/2019

 Southern District of Ohio

David C. Johnson

3:17-CV-415

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff

✔ Michael J. Newman
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4570 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4570

 To reauthorize the United States Commission on Civil Rights, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2010

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the United States Commission on Civil Rights, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Commission on Civil 
Rights Reauthorization Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    The Civil Rights Commission Act of 1983 (42 U.S.C. 1975 et seq.) is 
amended by striking sections 5 and 6 and inserting the following:

``SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated, to carry out this Act 
$19,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014.''.

SEC. 3. APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS.

    Subsection (b) of section 2 of the Civil Rights Commission Act of 
1983 (42 U.S.C. 1975) is amended by striking ``Thereafter'' and all 
that follows through the end of the subsection and inserting ``A 
vacancy existing on or after the date of the enactment of the United 
States Commission on Civil Rights Reauthorization Act of 2010 shall be 
filled by the President by and with the advice and consent of the 
Senate.''.

SEC. 4. ANNUAL REPORTS.

    Section 3(c)(1) of the Civil Rights Commission Act of 1983 (42 
U.S.C. 1975a(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``one report'' and inserting 
``2 reports''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 15**

April 26, 2010 

Bank of America, N.A. asTrustee 

  for the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust: 

Re: Registration Statements No. 33-55784 and No. 333-91460 on Form S-8 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated April 26, 2010 related toour review of interim financial information. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not consideredpart of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

KPMG LLP 

Fort Worth, Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

RENEE M. MILLER, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-233

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (consent case)

Defendant.

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) LIFTING THE STAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF 

ADDRESSING THE JOINT MOTION TO REMAND; (2) GRANTING THE JOINT

MOTION FOR REMAND (DOC. 17); (3) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE 

COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR 

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND (4) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S 

DOCKET

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is presently before the Court on the parties’ 

joint stipulation to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings 

pursuant to the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 17. Based upon the stipulation of 

the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) the stay on this case is 

LIFTED; (2) the ALJ’s non-disability finding is found unsupported by substantial evidence, and 

the parties’ joint request for a remand (doc. 17) is GRANTED; (3) this case is REMANDED to 

the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and

(4) this case is TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket. The Clerk is ORDERED to enter 

judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 1/31/2019 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10668

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

THOMAS GARCIA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:10-CR-63-2

Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Thomas Garcia, Jr., has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 21, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10668 Document: 00511963448 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
No. 11-10668

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-10668 Document: 00511963448 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2012