alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 22


  Subsidiaries of Raytech Corporation               Incorporated

  Advanced Friction Materials Company                 Michigan
  44600 Merrill Road
  Sterling Heights, MI 48314

  Allomatic Products Company                          Delaware
  609 E. Chaney Street
  Sullivan, IN 47882

  Automotive Composites Company                       Delaware
  44650 Merrill Road
  Sterling Heights, MI 48314

  Raybestos Aftermarket Products Company              Delaware
  964 East Market Street
  Crawfordsville, IN 47933

  Raybestos Friction Products (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.      China
  Xiang Yang Road, Suzhou New District
  215011 Suzhou, China

  Raybestos Industrie-Produkte GmbH                   Germany
  Industriestrasse, 7
  D-54497 Morbach, Germany

  Raybestos Products Company                          Delaware
  1204 Darlington Avenue
  Crawfordsville, IN 47933

  Raybestos Reibtechnik GmbH                          Germany
  Quettingerstrasse, 220
  D-51381 Leverkusen 3, Germany

  Raybestos, Inc.                                     Delaware
  1204 Darlington Avenue
  Crawfordsville, IN 47933

  Raybestos U.K. Ltd.                                 England
  16, Spindus Road
  Speke
  Liverpool L24 1YA, England

  RayMan Company, LLC                                 Delaware
  312 St. St. Clair Street
  Sullivan, IN 47882

  Raytech Composites Europe GmbH                      Germany
  Industriestrasse, 7
  D-54497 Morbach, Germany

  Raytech Composites, Inc.                            Delaware
  Suite 295, Four Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484

  Raytech Europe, Inc.                                Delaware
  Suite 295, Four Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484

  Raytech Powertrain, Inc.                            Delaware
  Suite 295, Four Corporate Drive
  Shelton, CT 06484

  Raytech Systems, Inc.                               Delaware
  312 S. St. Clair Street
  Sullivan, IN 47882

  RCI, Inc.                                           Delaware
  2780 Waterfront Parkway East Drive
  Suite 100
  Indianapolis, IN 46214
p130753.eng INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0753 Focus Ready Draft 8/12/2013 ENGINEER: Jay \ REC PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER:

Page 1p130753.eng

SAT (concerns) (08/02/2013): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox: Analogs: Migration to groundwater: Hyd Pdt negl PBT rating: P3B1T1 PMN - P1B1T1; Hyd Pdt - P3B1T1. Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 2p130753.eng

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None.
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0753

Page 3p130753.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0753

Page 4p130753.eng

Page 5p130753.eng

Page 6
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marx Toys and Entertainment Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I,
Robert Bamberry, President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Robert Bamberry
President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
September 17, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




I, Mack I. Whittle,  Jr., Chief Executive  Officer of The South Financial Group,
Inc.  ("TSFG") certify that to the best of my knowledge,  based upon a review of
the annual  report on Form 10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2004 of TSFG
(the "Report"):


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         TSFG.



/s/ Mack I. Whittle, Jr.
Mack I. Whittle, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
The South Financial Group, Inc.
March 10, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc.
and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128292 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128292 COA: 259574 Kalkaska CC: 02-002287-FH CARLTON JAMES RAPOZA, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 17, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors
Applied Innovation Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-62646, 33-94582, 333-100681, 333-68608, 333-67259 and 333-4432) on Form S-8
of Applied Innovation Inc. of our reports dated January 24, 2003, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Applied Innovation Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and the related financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 2002, which reports appear in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form
10-K of Applied Innovation Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 20, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,508
<PP&E>                                          76,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,350
<BONDS>                                         36,868
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,021
<COMMON>                                        28,752
<OTHER-SE>                                     (45,680)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,311
<SALES>                                        242,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,051
<CGS>                                          231,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  231,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,364
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,150)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.30)
        

</TABLE>
State of Israel Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Authority

**Page 1 of 1**

**G:\AIRW-EN\AD\AD G200\AD 57-10-06-18 cracked nuts\AD 57-10-06-18.doc**  AD 57-10-06-18 Date: July 27, 2010

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

**This Airworthiness Directive, issued by the Civil A viation Authority in accordance with the**  **Israeli Air Navigation Regulations applies to an ai rcraft for which our records list you as the**  **registered owner. It affects aviation safety and re quires your immediate attention. No person may**  **operate an aircraft to which an Airworthiness Direc tive applies, except in accordance with that** 

**Directive**

.

APPLIES TO **: Israel Aircraft Industries Models GALAXY and Gulf stream 200 aircraft**  **serial numbers 219 through 231 certificated in any category.** 

SUBJECT: **Inspection and replacement of cracked nuts in speci fic area.** 

REASON: **Cracked nuts (P/N MS-21042L3) were found on aircra ft's production line** 

**during routine post assembly inspection. Investigat ion revealed that the**  **cracks resulted from hydrogen embrittlement combine d with high hardness.**  **Non-conformity with certified mechanical properties of this fastener can**  **potentially lead to an unsafe condition.**

ACTION: **Perform one time radiographic inspection according to Service Bulletin** 

**SB 200-51-366 to detect and replace cracked nuts.**

COMPLIANCE **: Unless already accomplished, comply with this AD at the next suitable** 

**planned maintenance inspection within the next 12 m onths from the** 

**effective date of this AD.**

EFECTIVE DATE **: August 15, 2010**

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT **: Mr Boaz Keren, Engineering Branch, CAAI, P.O.Box 8, Ben-Gurion Airport, Israel 70150.**  **Telephone: 972-3-9774549, Fax: 972-3-9774592, e-m ail: kerenb@mot.gov.il**
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 68-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 1 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 68-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 2 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 68-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 3 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 68-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 4 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 68-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 5 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 68-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 6 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 68-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 7 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 68-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 8 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 68-4      Filed 08/20/2004     Page 9 of 9
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

D. E. BLANKENSHIP, Jr., 

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

LEONARD VARE; NEVADA 

ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 12-15484

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00641-LRHVPC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 16, 2015

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge and IKUTA and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Donald Blankenship, who was convicted in Nevada state court of sexually 

assaulting his daughter, appeals the district court’s denial of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas 

relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We affirm.

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except 

as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

FILED

DEC 2 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

1. The conclusion of the Nevada Supreme Court that Blankenship “failed to 

show that there was a reasonable probability of a different result at trial” had 

testimony regarding certain prior bad acts not been elicited by defense counsel was 

not an unreasonable application of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 

The victim testified in detail as to each assault, and the case turned on her credibility. 

The testimony about prior bad acts was a minor portion of the evidence that the jury

heard, and the state did not mention the bad acts in summation. Fairminded jurists 

could thus “disagree on the correctness of the state court’s decision.” Harrington 

v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 101 (2011) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).

2. We decline to expand the certificate of appealability and therefore do not 

address Blankenship’s remaining arguments.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K, into the Trust's previously filed
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 and S-3: 1988 Non-Statutory Stock Option
Plan, Share Compensation Plan for Outside Trustees, 1997 Incentive Plan (File
No. 333-57815), Dividend Reinvestment Plan for Shareholders (File No. 333-81763)
and (File No. 333-60638).

                                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Philadelphia, PA
March 26, 2002
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF UNITED DOMINION REALTY, L.P.




This Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United
Dominion Realty, L.P., dated as of March 13, 2009 (this “Amendment”), is being executed by UDR,
Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “General Partner”), as the general partner of United Dominion
Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), pursuant to the authority
conferred upon the General Partner by Section 11.01 of the Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P., dated as of February 23, 2004, as amended by
the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United Dominion
Realty, L.P., dated as of June 24, 2005, the Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement
of Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P., dated as of February 23, 2006, the Third
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty,
L.P., dated as of January 2, 2007, the Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P., dated as of December 27, 2007 (the “Fourth
Amendment”), the Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
United Dominion Realty, L.P., dated as of March 7, 2008, and the Sixth Amendment to the Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of United Dominion Realty, L.P., dated as of December 9,
2008 (as amended, the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined herein,
shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.



WHEREAS, the General Partner desires to amend the Agreement to revise the Conversion Factor
applicable to the Class I Out-Performance Partnership Shares in connection with the distribution to
each holder of Class I Out-Performance Partnership Shares of 0.5091 Partnership Units per Class I
Out-Performance Shares held by such holder.



NOW THEREFORE, the General Partner hereby amends the Partnership Agreement as follows:



1. Amendment. The definition of “Conversion Factor” set forth in the Fourth Amendment
is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:



“‘Conversion Factor’ means 1.0, as adjusted pursuant to Section 8.05(f) of
the Agreement.”



2. Miscellaneous. Except as specifically amended hereby, the terms, covenants,
provisions and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unmodified and continue in full force and
effect and, except as amended hereby, all of the terms, covenants, provisions and conditions of the
Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.



[Signature Page Follows]




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first written
above.



GENERAL PARTNER:



UDR, INC.



By:  /s/ Warren L. Troupe

Name: Warren L. Troupe

Title: Senior Executive Vice President
**EXHIBIT10.3**

 

*****Text Omitted and Filed Separately with theSecurities and Exchange**

**Commission. Confidential Treatment Requested Under**

**17 C.F.R.Sections 200.80(b)(4) and 240.24b-2**

 

[Amylin Letterhead]

 

February 11,2010

 

BaxterPharmaceutical Solutions LLC

927South Curry Pike

Bloomington,Indiana 47403

Attn:  Brik Eyre

 
| **Re:** | ** ** | **Commercial Supply Agreement  between Baxter Pharmaceutical Solutions LLC (“Baxter”) and Amylin  Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Amylin”) dated as of March 2, 2005 (the  “Agreement”) for Symlin (“Product”)** |
|---------|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

DearBrik:

 

Thisletter will confirm that Amylin and Baxter have agreed to amend the Agreement (i) todelete in its entirety the Annual Obligation for Year Five (calendar year 2009)such that Amylin shall have no further obligation to purchase from Baxter anAnnual Obligation for calendar year 2009 and (ii) to add a requirement forAmylin to pay to Baxter a minimum of [***] in calendar year 2010, whichrequirement may be satisfied by (a) the purchase by Amylin of Productunder the Agreement or (b) the purchase by Amylin of any other product orservice under another agreement, or (c) the payment to Baxter in [***] of[***], provided, however, for (b) and (c) that if such other productor service is subject to a minimum annual obligation for calendar year 2010 inplace as of the date of this letter agreement, then such payment shall satisfythe requirement under this letter agreement only to the extent such paymentexceeds the minimum annual obligation for [***].

 

Unlessotherwise stated in this letter agreement, each capitalized term shall have thesame meaning ascribed to it in the Agreement. This letter contains the entire understanding and agreement betweenBaxter and Amylin and supersedes all prior agreements and understandingsrelating to the subject matter hereof. Except as expressly stated in this letter agreement, the Agreementremains unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

 

***** Confidential Treatment Requested**

 

----

 

*****Text Omitted and Filed Separately with theSecurities and Exchange**

**Commission. Confidential Treatment Requested Under**

**17 C.F.R.Sections 200.80(b)(4) and 240.24b-2**

 

Kindlyconfirm your agreement to the above provisions by counter-signing this letterbelow. Thank you for your prompt assistance with this matter.

 

Yourssincerely,

 

**Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.**

 

 
| /s/ David Banks               |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| David Banks, VP Manufacturing |   |

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEDAND AGREED:

 

 

**Baxter Pharmaceutical Solutions LLC**

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Birk V. Eyre |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|
|   |             |   |
| Name:  | Birk V. Eyre     |   |
|   |             |   |
| Title: | General Manager  |   |

 

----
1

MELISSA MCFADDEN,

 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:18-cv-544

 Judge Sargus, Jr.

v.

CITY OF COLUMBUS,

Defendant.

Jury Trial Day 1

Monday, June 6, 2022

Before Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

For Plaintiff: John Marshall and Sam Schlein

For Defendant: Susan Williams, Wes Phillips and Paul Bernhart

Courtroom Deputy: Christin Werner

Courtroom Deputy: Crystal Hatchett

8:30 a.m. Conference held in chambers.

9:00 a.m. Prospective jurors sworn in and Voir Dire begins.

9:50 a.m. Jury selected.

10:00 a.m. Jury instructions given.

Opening statement by plaintiff (attorney John Marshall).

Opening statement by defendants (attorney Susan Williams).

Gary Dunlap called by plaintiff (attorney John Marshall).

Mr. Dunlap testified to exhibit 8.

Deputy Chief Kenneth Kuebler called by video deposition by plaintiff (attorney 

John Marshall). 

Deputy Chief Kuebler testified to exhibits 13, 10 and 12.

Sargent Christopher Smith-Hughes called by plaintiff (attorney Sam Schlein).

Sgt. Smith-Hughes testified to exhibit JE 6.

Cross examination of Sg. Smith-Hughes by defendant (attorney Susan Williams).

Redirect examination of Sgt. Smith-Hughes by plaintiff (attorney Schlein).

Case: 2:18-cv-00544-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 98 Filed: 06/06/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 5725
2

Maranda Vollmer testimony read into the record by plaintiff (attorney Sam 

Schlein).

Ms. Vollmer testified to exhibits JE 6 and JE 8.

Sargent Christopher Odom called by plaintiff (attorney Sam Schlein).

Cross examination of Sgt. Odom by defendant (attorney Susan Williams).

Sgt. Odom testified to exhibit JE 6.

Commander Mark Gardener called by plaintiff (attorney John Marshall).

Commander Gardner testified to exhibit 11. 

Deputy Chief Kenneth Kuebler called by video deposition by defendant (attorney 

Wes Phillips). 

Deputy Chief Kuebler testified to plaintiff exhibits 12 and 13 and defense exhibit 

A. 

4:30 p.m. Court adjourns until 8:45 a.m., Tuesday, June 7, 2022.

Case: 2:18-cv-00544-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 98 Filed: 06/06/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 5726