alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FW: mill count 

Michael Ling 

to: 

Pam Long 

05/13/2010 11:00 AM 

Show Details 

OMB docket item 

 

Michael Ling 

Associate Director 

Air Quality Policy Division 

U.S. EPA - OAQPS 

(919) 541-4729 

-----Forwarded by Michael Ling/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/13/2010 10:59AM ----- 

To: Michael Ling/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

Date: 04/27/2010 05:59PM 

Subject: FW: mill count 

From: Hunt, Tim [mailto:Tim_Hunt@afandpa.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:05 AM 

To: King, Heidi R. 

Cc: Hale, Rhea; Noe, Paul; Schwartz, Jerry 

Subject: RE: mill count

 

Heidi,

I should have mentioned that we represent about half the wood product industry so the 

aggregate numbers should be 2X – thus 200 wood product mills are still affected at the 75K level.

On the paper side, we represent a much larger share.

Tim

From: Hunt, Tim 

Page 1 of 3

file://C:\Documents and Settings\plong\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web3051.htm 5/13/2010
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:59 AM 

To: 'King, Heidi R.' 

Cc: Hale, Rhea; Noe, Paul; Schwartz, Jerry 

Subject: mill count

 

Heidi, 

 

You asked yesterday about how many wood product mills might be caught by different 

thresholds. At 25K metric tons CO2 equivalent, 5 wood product mills are above based on fossil 

fuel emissions and 150 if you include biomass CO2 emissions. At 75K, no wood product mills 

would emit fossil fuel CO2 at that level but still 101 mills emit that much CO2 from biomass. This 

reinforces the point that the carbon neutrality principle approach is the only real way to avoid the 

unnecessary burdens that would befall the wood product industry. At 100K tons, 90 mills are still 

effected. 

 

On the pulp and paper mill side, the issue is different. Most mills will be major emitters of fossil 

CO2 anyway but many of their projects (boiler modifications and the like) would not be covered if 

biomass emissions retained their carbon neutral status. The quantify of biomass used on the 

paper side compare to the wood products side is significantly higher so hundreds of projects may 

be effected given that each major mill probably has two to four biomass based combustion 

systems. 

 

Thanks again for meeting with us. 

 

Timothy Hunt

Senior Director, Air Quality Programs 

AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION

1111 19th St NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036

tim_hunt@afandpa.org

202.463.2588 w

202.463.2787 f

www.afandpa.org

 

Page 2 of 3

file://C:\Documents and Settings\plong\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web3051.htm 5/13/2010
Page 3 of 3

file://C:\Documents and Settings\plong\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web3051.htm 5/13/2010
Exhibit K

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-30 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 3247
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRCIT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

STACIE RAY, et al. 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

STEPHANIE MCCLOUD, et al. 

Defendants

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV JUDGE 

MICHAEL WATSON MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

CHELSEY VASCURA 

DECLARATION OF JENNIFER ROACH 

(pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746)

I, Jennifer Roach, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following are 

true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

1. I am above the age of 18 and reside in Ohio.

2. I have personal knowledge and knowledge of facts to which I am informed and believe

the same to be true and that this declaration is based on and therefore necessarily limited

by the records and information still in existence, presently recollected and thus far

discovered from the books and records of Thompson Hine LLP kept in the normal and

ordinary course of business about the matters to which I attest.

3. I represented the Plaintiffs in the above-styled case.

4. I am licensed to practice law in Ohio and in the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Ohio, United States District Court of the Northern District of

Ohio, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Supreme Court

of the United States.

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-30 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 3248
2 

5. I have been continuously licensed since 2001. 

6. My firm biography detailing my professional qualifications is attached as Exhibit K-1 to 

this Declaration. 

7. Thompson Hine lawyers kept contemporaneous time records in the above-styled case in 

six-minute increments. 

8. I exercised billing judgment to exclude time that was not reasonably related to the 

successful prosecution of the case and to exclude small tasks and any incomplete time 

entries. 

9. The spreadsheet attached as Exhibit K-2 to this Declaration shows the name of the 

Thompson Hine lawyer providing services, the amount of time billed, a description of 

the services provided, the hourly rate, the fee for the services, and the date on which the 

services were provided. Thompson Hine lawyers have invested 83.2 hours in 

representing Plaintiffs in the above-styled case. 

10. The reasonable hourly rate for the Thompson Hine lawyers working on this litigation 

ranges between $130 per hour for Discovery Counsel to $605 per hour for Partners. 

11. The lodestar figure for Thompson Hine’s services, determined by multiplying the 

reasonable hours spent by Thompson Hine lawyers on this matter by the corresponding 

hourly rate is $19,084.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on February 1, 2021. 

Jennifer S. Roach 

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-30 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 3249
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of National Lampoon, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(a)           The
annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2008 of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;  and




(b)           Information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  November
10, 2008




/s/ Daniel S.
Laikin


Daniel S.
Laikin, Chief Executive Officer and President




/s/ Lorraine
Evanoff


Lorraine
Evanoff, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4595 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4595

 To establish the Internet Freedom Foundation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2010

Mr. Wu (for himself and Mr. Wolf) introduced the following bill; which 
        was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish the Internet Freedom Foundation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Internet Freedom Act of 2010''.
            (1) The National Science Foundation shall establish the 
        Internet Freedom Foundation governed by a board of 12 members, 
        with equal representation from government, academia, and the 
        private sector.
            (2) The Internet Freedom Foundation shall promote Internet 
        freedom through education, advocacy, and research.
            (3) The Internet Freedom Foundation shall be funded by such 
        sums as may be necessary.
                                 <all>
```
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for 1

the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 95-4261

___________

Virginia M. Binger, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

H.M.A. Investments, Inc., a *

Delaware corporation; Howard M. * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appel, *

*

Appellants. *

___________

 Submitted: October 25, 1996

 Filed: October 30, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

H.M.A. Investments, Inc., a Philadelphia investment banking and

consulting firm, and Howard M. Appel, its owner, appeal from the District

Court's grant of summary judgment to plaintiff Virginia M. Binger in her 1

diversity action seeking to enforce a promissory note. Having reviewed the

record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the judgment of the District

Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending July 3, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerAugust 5, 2009




26
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

 

I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 16, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Thomas J. Diemer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Prudential
Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 12, 2010



| |  |                                                                |  |  |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
| |  | /s/   Thomas J. Diemer                                         |  |  |  | 
| |  | Name:  Thomas J. Diemer                                       
| |  | Title:    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Estate of Jacob *W.*Seitzinger, Deceased. Appeal of Pennsylvania Trust Company, Trustee of Mary Agnes Boardman.

*Will*— Trust *and trustees.*

Argued March 5, 1895.

Appeal, No. 23, Jan. T., 1895, by Pennsylvania Trust Company, trustee, from decree of O. C. Berks Co., overruling exceptions to adjudication.

Before Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Affirmed.

Exceptions to adjudication.

The facts appear in Illig’s Appeal, supra.

*Philip 8. Zieber*and *Baer $*Snyder, for appellant.

*539October 7, 1895:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

The appeals of Illig and Brother, and James K. Getz, trustee, and others, from the same decree in which opinions are herewith filed, rule this ease.

The decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at costs of appel lant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SHIRLEY SHAWE, §

§ No. 536, 2015

Proposed Intervenor Below- §

Appellant, §

§ Court Below: Court of Chancery

v. § of the State of Delaware

§ 

ELIZABETH ELTING, § C.A. No. 9686-CB

§

Defendant Below-Appellee. §

Submitted: April 20, 2016

Decided: April 20, 2016

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND and VALIHURA, Justices.

O R D E R

This 20th day of April 2016, upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and the 

record below, we find it evident that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should 

be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the well-reasoned 

decision dated September 2, 2015 denying Shirley Shawe’s motion to intervene.

1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice 

 

1

Shawe v. Elting, 2015 WL 5167835 (Del. Ch. Sept. 2, 2015).
OMB Package for Pell Grant Experiments Random Assignment Data Collection Form

Data Collection Form: PGE Student Random Assignment Data Collection Form

Instructions: Please provide the following data elements for all students at your institution who are 

qualified for and have agreed to participate in the Pell Grant Experiments Study. The data matrix 

below can be completed electronically and uploaded to the secure website upon completion (insert 

web submission instructions here). 

List of Data Elements for Entry into Random Assignment Database

Data Element Entry Field Instructions

Student’s First Name

Student’s Middle Name

Student’s Last Name

Social Security Number (xxx-xx-xxxx)

Date of Birth (yyyy, mm, dd)

Name of PGE Program (Insert name)
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 718 

Reaffirming the Senate’s commitment to the orderly and peaceful transfer 

of power called for in the Constitution of the United States, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. CARPER, Mr. SCHATZ, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and 

Mr. COONS) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming the Senate’s commitment to the orderly and 

peaceful transfer of power called for in the Constitution 

of the United States, and for other purposes. 

Whereas the United States is founded on the principle that 

our Government derives its power from the consent of the 

governed and that the people have the right to change 

their elected leaders through elections; 

Whereas our domestic tranquility, national security, general 

welfare, and civil liberties depend upon the peaceful and 

orderly transfer of power; and 

Whereas any disruption occasioned by the transfer of the executive power could produce results detrimental to the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 718 ATS 

safety and well-being of the United States and its people: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) reaffirms its commitment to the orderly and 

3 peaceful transfer of power called for in the Constitu4 tion of the United States; and 

5 (2) intends that there should be no disruptions 

6 by the President or any person in power to overturn 

7 the will of the people of the United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT B 

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 237-4 Filed: 03/02/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 19786
Election Results 

10 Governor 10 Att. General 08 President 06 Att. General 

District Kasich Strickland De Wine Cordray McCain Obama M ont. Dann 

1 - Chabot 56.09% 40.58% 53.98% 39.76% 52.10% 46.89% 56.16% 43.84% 

2 - Schmidt 54.81% 41.58% 52.69% 39.95% 53.99% 44.59% 54.48% 45.51% 

3- Open 33.80% 63.29% 29.29% 66.63% 29.53% 69.18% 39.95% 60.04% 

4 - Jordan 52.80% 42.17% 54.61% 37.98% 53.26% 44.85% 50.82% 49.21% 

5 - l atta 51.20% 44.67% 54.24% 39.13% 51.33% 46.93% 49.90% 50.08% 

6 - Johnson 46.64% 49.51% 49.90% 43.73% 53.08% 44.67% 43.05% 56.95% 

7 - Gibbs 52.89% 41.86% 50.37% 41.81% 50.95% 46.84% 47.65% 52.35% 

8- Boehner 58.84% 37.04% 59.17% 34.32% 57.65% 40.80% 56.07% 43.93% 

9 - Kaptur/Kucinich 37.44% 58.12% 36.88% 57.70% 32.79% 65.66% 36.31% 63.69% 

10 - Turner/Austria 54.14% 42.13% 55.29% 39.08% 53.13% 45.41% 54.92% 45.09% 

11 - Fudge 21.50% 75.64% 21.00% 75.79% 17.21% 82.03% 26.04% 73.97% 

12 - Tiberi 59.26% 37.49% 52.40% 41.26% 54.97% 43.54% 57.93% 42.06% 

13 - Ryan 34.55% 61.41% 32.35% 61.35% 35.77% 62.27% 29.67% 70.32% 

14 - Latourette 52.93% 42.89% 49.58% 43.82% 49.45% 49.06% 46.86% 53.14% 

15 - Stivers 53.57% 42.66% 49.03% 44.80% 53.31% 44.90% 53.89% 46.11% 

16 - Renacci/ Sutton 54.96% 40.83% 51.46% 42.02% 51.35% 47.15% 48.94% 51.07% 

06 Auditor 04 President 

Taylor Sykes Bush Kerry PVI 

60.35% 39.65% 57.16% 42.45% R+6 

57.85% 42.14% 59.27% 40.29% R+8 

38.06% 61.93% 35.46% 63.73% 0+16 

55.50% 44.53% 58.21% 41.27% R+8 

58.39% 41.58% 58.76% 40.79% R+7 

42.81% 57.19% 53.74% 45.72% R+5 

52.51% 47.49% 54.89% 44.56% R+5 

59.49% 40.52% 61.45% 38.13% R+ll 

41.19% 58.80% 36.67% 62.96% 0+13 

56.45% 43.55% 56.16% 43.39% R+6 

25.83% 74.17% 20.31% 79.01% 0+29 

58.94% 41.05% 61.16% 38.36% R+lO 

35.46% 64.54% 36.91% 62.50% 0+12 

53.29% 46.72% 52.35% 47.18% R+3 

54.09% 45.92% 57.27% 42.11% R+7 

54.52% 45.49% 54.22% 45.34% R+5 

White 

74.83% 

88.52% 

64.23% 

91.60% 

92.84% 

96.14% 

93.92% 

86.07% 

80.41% 

85.43% 

43.19% 

88.94% 

86.36% 

92.98% 

91.90% 

95.06% 

Voting Age Populations 

Hispanic 

2.17% 

1.35% 

4.78% 

3.25% 

3.46% 

0.70% 

1.30% 

2.24% 

6.81% 

1.65% 

3.35% 

1.77% 

2.16% 

1.71% 

1.59% 

1.48% 

i 

! 

~ 

~ 

Black 

20.32% 

8.48% 

27.47% 

5.21% 

3.37% 

2.23% 

3.97% 

9.79% 

13.73% 

10.72% 

51.31% 

5.73% 

10.42% 

3.63% 

4.33% 

1.74% 

Asian Amlndian 

2.51% 0.20% 

1.21% 0.25% 

3.33% 0.28% 

0.52% 0.25% 

1.30% 0.23% 

0.36% 0.22% 

0.53% 0.25% 

1.73% 0.21% 

1.27% 0.30% 

1.73% 0.23% 

2.32% 0. 22% 

3.42% 0.18% 

1.11% 0.21% 

1.83% 0.12% 

1.64% 0.25% 

1.87% 0.14% 

REV_00000022 

Plaintiffs' Trial

Exhibit

P599

Case No. 1:18-cv-00357

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 237-4 Filed: 03/02/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 19787
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JEWELL EVETTE JONES, et al.,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:18-cv-37

vs.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT District Judge Walter H. Rice

OF JOBS AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al., Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) VACATING THE DATES AND DEADLINES SET IN THE 

PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER (DOC. 15); AND (2) ORDERING THE PARTIES’

TO CONFER AND FILE AN AMENDED RULE 26(F) REPORT

______________________________________________________________________________

This civil case is before the Court following Plaintiff’s filing of an amended complaint. 

Doc. 34. As previously contemplated by the Court (doc. 33 at PageID 564), the undersigned 

VACATES the dates and deadlines set forth in the Preliminary Pretrial Order (doc. 15) and 

ORDERS the parties to confer and file an amended Rule 26(f) Report.1 The parties’ Rule 26(f) 

report shall be filed with the Court on or before December 2, 2019. 

Because Plaintiff is not represented by an attorney, he does not have access to the electronic 

filing system (CM/ECF) and will not receive service electronically via such system. Accordingly, 

all parties must serve all filings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 and a certificate of service must be 

attached thereto setting forth the date and manner of service. 

To ensure timely communication with the Court, all counsel of record and pro se Plaintiff 

must immediately inform the Court and the other parties, in writing, of changes to your mailing 

address and/or telephone number. In this regard, the parties are ORDERED to file notices of 

1 A form Rule 26(f) Report of the Parties (applicable to the Western Division at Dayton) is 

accessible on the Court’s website at: http://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/ohio-southern-district-forms.
2

change of address or phone number as soon as practicable after any such change.

The parties are ADVISED that failure to comply with any provision of this Order may 

result in appropriate sanctions including, but not limited to, dismissal of this action or the entry of

a default judgment pursuant Rule 16(f) and Rule 37(b)(2)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: October 28, 2019 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge