alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Burke vs. Gaines et al.

For the questions involved and principles decided, see the preceding caso of *Gaines al. vs. Hale.*

*Appeal from the Circuit Cov/rt of Sot Bpring*County.

lion. J’oiiN C..Mubray, Circuit Judge.

Puns & CuMMiNS, for tlie appellant.

IVatbiNS & CubbaN, and TbapNAll, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Walkeb,

delivered tlie opinion of tlie Court.

The plaintiffs brought ejectment to recover possession of lands, which they claimed to hold by virtue of an entry made under a right of pre-emption, granted by an act of Congress, approved 29th May, 1830. Upon the trial, the certificate of entry was offered in evidence, and permitted, by the court, to go to the jury over the objection of defendant. The other facts necessary to entitle the planitiffs to recover, were admitted by the defendant. The defendant then proposed to prove that there were adverse equitable claims, upon the same land; that the plaintiffs were not, in fact, entitled to a pre-emption, and that no adjudication was had by the Register and. Receiver, who permitted the entry to be made.

Por the purposes of the trial, the plaintiffs admitted the fact 1o.be true, but objected to the evidence as irrelevant and incompetent, under the issue in this case, and the objection was sustained and the evidence excluded. Several instructions were asked by the defendant to be given to the jury; the effect of which was to impeach the validity of the entry, upon the ground *28that it was void. Judgment was for the plaintiffs. The Circuit Court decided correctly, upon all of the questions of law arising upon the exceptions taken in the the case; according to the decision of this court, at the present term in the case of *Gaines el al. vs. John C. Hale,*in which tire same entry was considered, and held to be valid. And that evidence, such as was offered by the defendant in this case, was inadmissible in an action of ejectment, in which the plaintiff claims title under the certificate of entry, which, under our statute, is made sufficient evidence of title, to entitle the plaintiff to recover against any one who cannot show a superior legal title.

Such defence, if available to the defendants, must be made in equity, not at law. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Before Mr. Justices Scott and "WALKER, and Hon. ThoMAS Joi-iN-soN, Special Judge.

Mr. Chief Justice ENGLISH not sitting in this case.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William H. Largent, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Applied Innovation Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date:       March 20, 2006                                                           /s/ William H. Largent   William H. Largent   Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM









We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-173568, 333-169710, 333-169205, 333-166162, 333-165977, 333-163267, 333-162349, 333-160948, 333-158001, 333-153715, 333-153714, 333-149081, 333-148529, 333-145714, 333-141341, 333-137699, 333-131894, 333-128745, 333-122289, 333-119547, 333-117121, 333-115082, 333-112465, 333-114162, 333-112272, 333-110003, 333-109387, 333-107729, 333-106748, 333-104267, 333-102610, 333-101782, 333-100272, 333-98575, 333-91788, 333-85930, 333-85352, 333-76034, 333-76266, 333-57676, 333-89761, and 333-67317, on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement Nos. 333-173393, 333-140176 and 333-155497 on Form S-8 of our report, dated July 14, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Investors Real Estate Trust and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Investors Real Estate Trust and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Investors Real Estate Trust for the year ended April 30, 2011.











/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





Minneapolis, Minnesota


July 14, 2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6173

ANDRE EDMONDS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONALD R. CUMMINGS; JAMES KEELING; PAGE TRUE;

RUFUS FLEMINGS, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-625-3)

Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 26, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Edmonds, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Andre Edmonds, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)

complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is

frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Edmonds v. Cummings, No. CA-01-625-3 (E.D. Va.

Jan. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending July 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Richard E. Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard E. LundinRichard E. LundinChief Executive OfficerAugust 2, 2005
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William H. Largent, certify that:1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Applied InnovationInc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: April 30, 2007       /s/ William H. Largent         William H. Largent    President and Chief Executive Officer  
29
#### People v Alfred Williams,

No. 90972;

Court of Appeals No. 117013.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4379 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require contractors and subcontractors working on military construction projects to comply with licensing 

requirements for employees working at the project location. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. LANGEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require contractors and subcontractors working on military construction 

projects to comply with licensing requirements for employees working at the project location. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4379 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR CONTRACTORS AND SUB2 CONTRACTORS WORKING ON MILITARY CON3 STRUCTION PROJECTS TO COMPLY WITH 

4 STATE AND LOCAL WORKFORCE LICENSING 

5 REQUIREMENTS. 

6 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Subchapter III of chapter 169 

7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting 

8 after section 2855 the following new section: 

9 ‘‘§ 2855a. Application of State and local workforce li10 censing requirements to military con11 struction projects 

12 ‘‘(a) APPLICATION OF REQUIREMENTS.—As a condi13 tion of each contract awarded in connection with a mili14 tary construction project or a military family housing 

15 project, the Secretary concerned shall require the con16 tractor (and any subcontractor of the contractor) to com17 ply with workforce licensing requirements imposed by the 

18 State and other jurisdictions in which the project is con19 ducted for all employees of the contractor and subcontrac20 tors who work at the project location. 

21 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary of Defense may 

22 waive the application of subsection (a) to a military con23 struction project or a military family housing project, on 

24 a case-by-case basis, in the interest of national security. 

25 ‘‘(c) WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.—The re26 quirements of this section shall apply notwithstanding any 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4379 IH

1 immunity of the Secretary concerned or officers, agents, 

2 or employees of the Department of Defense under any law 

3 or rule of law. 

4 ‘‘(d) STATE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

5 ‘State’ means any of the several States, the District of 

6 Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American 

7 Samoa, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the 

8 Northern Mariana Islands, or Guam.’’. 

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

10 at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by insert11 ing after the item relating to section 2855 the following 

12 new item: 

‘‘2855a. Application of State and local workforce licensing requirements to military construction projects.’’. 

Æ 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
## 1107 Ninth Street, Suite 1005

Sacramento, CA 95814

(916) 441

- 5700 (916) 441

- 5708 FAX

www.capcoa.org

PRESIDENT

Richard A. Stedman

Monterey Bay Unified APCD



### VICE PRESIDENT

Jim Wagoner

Butte County AQMD



### SECRETARY/CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFICER

Mike Villegas

Ventura County APCD



### PAST PRESIDENT

Jack P. Broadbent

Bay Area AQMD



### DIRECTORS

Larry Allen

San Luis Obispo County APCD

Christopher D. Brown

Feather River A

QMD

Mat Ehrhardt

Yolo

- Solano A QMD

Doug Gearhart

Lake County AQMD

Larry F. Greene

Sacramento Metro AQMD

Robert Kard

San Diego County APCD

Brad Poiriez

Imperial County APCD

Seyed Sadredin

San Joaquin Valley APCD

Barry Wallerstein

South Coast AQMD



### EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Alan Abbs

alan@capcoa.org 

## November 10, 2015

Gerardo Rios (Air

- 3)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

- 3901

RE: Docket ID No. EPA

- R09

- 0AR

- 2015

- 0280

Dear Mr. Rios:

Please withdraw the CAPCOA letter dated October 28, 2015 regarding the

above Docket ID number. If you have any questions, please contact me at 916

-

441

- 5700.

Sincerely,

Alan Abbs

Executive Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Support for Research Excellence—First Independent Research (SuRE-First) Award (R16—Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         February 25, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F36, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Noton K. Dutta, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F36, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-2857,                         *noton.dutta@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 25, 2022.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-01744 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

RICHARD BARROW, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

C/O TOBY HOLTON, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

 Case No. 2:18-cv-674 

 Judge Marbley 

 Magistrate Judge Jolson 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

Plaintiff Richard Barrow, and Defendants Toby Holton, Tony Barrett, Evan Smith, and 

Adam Smith, stipulate to the dismissal of this action, including all claims that were or could have 

been asserted in this Court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction against all Defendants 

as well as any other parties, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The 

parties have executed a private settlement agreement. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Jacqueline Greene /s/ Thomas E. Madden (per consent)

Jacqueline Greene Thomas E. Madden 

Sarah Gelsomino Christina E. Mahy 

Friedman & Gilbert Assistant Attorneys General 

55 Public Square, Suite 1055 Ohio Attorney General’s Office 

Cleveland, OH 44113 150 E. Gay St., 16th Floor 

(216) 241-1430 Columbus, OH 43215 

jgreene@f-glaw.com (614) 644-7233 

sgelsomino@f-glaw.com Thomas.Madden@ohioattorneygeneral.gov 

 Christina.Mahy@ohioattorneygeneral.gov 

Counsel for Plaintiff Richard Barrow Counsel for Defendants Toby Holton, Tony 

Barrett, Evan Smith, and Adam Smith 

Case: 2:18-cv-00674-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 39 Filed: 02/13/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 174
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 1, 2006 

 

 

20
SCWC

- 1 7

- 0000 385

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I , Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

vs.

DEWITT LONG , Petitioner / Defendant

- Appellant

.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 1 7

- 0000 385 ; CR. NO. 15

- 1

- 0840 )

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald , C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ochiai , in place of Pollack, J., recused , 1 and Circuit Judge Chang, in place of Wilson, J., recused. )

Petitioner/ Defendant

- Appellant Dewitt Long’s application

for writ of certiorari filed on June 22 , 2020 , is hereby
rejecte d

. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ‘ i, August 3 , 2020

. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Dean E. Ochiai
/s/ Gary W.B. Chang

1 Justice Pollack retired from the bench on June 30, 2020. Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000385 03-AUG-2020 08:53 AM