alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRAHEEM M. HERBERT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 304 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 27, 2022.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; Resolution of litigation claims; and Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

      ( print page 3616)    
Dated: January 20, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-01446 Filed 1-20-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Gabos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ PAUL G. GABOSPaul G. Gabos Chief Financial Officer


November 9, 2006
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the quarterly report of SpatiaLight, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Officer
      of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      ROBERT A. OLINS


Robert
      A.
      Olins


Chief
      Executive Officer, Principal


Financial
      and Accounting Officer







May
      10,
      2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JOSEPH COTTERMAN,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-177

vs.

SHELBY COUNTY, OHIO, et al., District Judge Walter H. Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER AND ENTRY GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 44)

______________________________________________________________________________

This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to compel. Doc. 44. Defendants 

filed a memorandum in opposition. Doc. 47. Plaintiff, with leave of Court, filed a reply. Doc. 50. 

Having carefully considered all of the foregoing, the undersigned GRANTS IN PART and 

DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion to compel and ORDERS as follows:

1. Defendants shall respond, forthwith, to Plaintiff’s interrogatories requesting the

identification of electronic devices issued or made available to Defendants and other

identified individuals between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2017;

2. Defendants shall respond, forthwith, to Plaintiff’s interrogatories requesting that they

identify the personal devices the named individual Defendants used between January 1,

2016 and May 31, 2017, with the limitation that the named individual Defendants need

only identify those personal devices they actually used for work purposes at any time

during this time period (i.e., they need only identify an electronic device is it was actually

used for work purposes during the relevant time period);

3. Defendants need not conduct a forensic search of the identified data storage devices and

data storage spaces associated therewith, but may certainly do so if they so choose;

4. However, Defendants shall, forthwith, conduct reasonable searches of all the

aforementioned identified devices and/or associated data storage spaces and, absent lawful

objections to production (e.g., privilege, relevance, etc.), produce materials responsive to

Plaintiff’s Rule 34 requests; and
5. Defendants shall disclose to Plaintiff the details of how the aforementioned searches for

ESI were conducted (e.g., identifying the search terms used, the storage medium searched,

etc.).

Counsel are encouraged to work continue working collaboratively with regard to the development 

of reasonable ESI searches, remaining mindful that the undersigned intends to construe the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure so as “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every 

action and proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: June 25, 2019 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge

2
#### People v Whack,

No. 91095;

Court of Appeals No. 115905.
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 9, 2006
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: October 28, 2008 

 

 

22
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached
as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by the
Report.
  By:
    /s/ Alberto R. Santa InesAlberto R. Santa InesChief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance  48
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PURDUE PHARMA L.P., etal.

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00037-EAS-EPD

ChiefJudge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

Chief Magistrate Judge

Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

ORDER

For good cause shown, the unopposed motionof PurduePharmaL.P., Purdue Pharma

Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Cephalon, Inc.,

Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Endo Phannaceuticals Inc., Allergan pic, Allergan Finance, LLC

f/k/a Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson

Pharma, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., and Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (collectively,

"Manufacturer Defendants") to stay the date by which to respond to the Complaint (ECF No, 13)

is GRANTED. The Manufacturer Defendants shall have sixty (60) days after the final

determination ofremoval to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED^ATB^ MAGISTRAtE JUDGt

ChiefMagistrate Judge Deavers
#### Joseph Edward EVANS, Appellant, v. Robert F. KENNEDY, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States, J. Edgar Hoover, Individually and as Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, James W. Kelly, Jr., Individually and as Mayor of East Orange, New Jersey, and Hugh Addonizio, Individually and as Mayor of Newark, New Jersey.

No. 15113.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 2, 1965.

Decided April 21, 1965.

Certiorari Denied May 17, 1965.

See 85 S.Ct. 1545.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Reynier J. Wortendyke, Jr., Judge. Joseph Edward Evans, pro se.

Nathan Edgar Finkel, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., on the brief), for Kennedy and Hoover.

Before HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and WEBER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM;

The appellant, appearing pro se, has vigorously presented his contention that he has been improperly denied a preliminary injunction pursuant to his complaint against named public officials and that the trial judge exhibited disqualifying bias against him. We are satisfied that the trial judge has acted with integrity and objectivity and that the denial of a preliminary injunction represented a proper exercise of discretion.

The judgment will be affirmed.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

 

RANDY F. WRIGHT, : 

 : Case No. 2:18-cv-609 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 v. : 

 : Magistrate Judge Vascura 

COMMISSIONER OF : 

SOCIAL SECURITY, : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

ORDER 

 This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s April 8, 2019, Report and 

Recommendation. (ECF No. 21). The Magistrate recommended that the Commissioner of 

Social Security’s non-disability finding be reversed and remanded to the Administrative Law 

Judge. 

 Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by April 22, 2019. No 

objections were filed. The parties’ failure to object results in a waiver of the right to have the 

district judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of 

the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. 

See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). 

 This Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on an independent 

consideration of the analysis therein. The Commissioner of Social Security’s non-disability 

finding is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the administrative law judge under 

Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 
2 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATED: July 9, 2019
Form of Term Sheet  - Corporate Executive



 Exhibit 10.2 
 MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 
 Executive Term Sheet 
 For 2009 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan 
 [Date] 
 [Name]: 
 The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has determined that you are eligible to participate in the Company’s 2009 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). Your
participation shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Term Sheet and the Plan. A copy of the Plan is attached to this Term Sheet. All capitalized terms in this Term Sheet have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 Target Award. The Committee has established a Target Award for you of [xx]% of your base salary. The Target Award is the
amount of incentive compensation that you will earn if 100% of your Participant Goals are achieved.  
 Calculation of Incentive
Compensation. A calculation worksheet is attached to this Term Sheet as Exhibit A. Also included on the calculation worksheet are your Participant Goals and weighting factors, as approved by the Committee. The amount of incentive
compensation you earn, if any, will be determined by converting the Company Performance Score to an Award Percentage using the conversion table included on Exhibit A. The Award Percentage will then be multiplied by your base salary to yield
the incentive compensation payment earned hereunder. 
  

	 	•	 	 If the Company Performance Score does not meet or exceed 90%, then no incentive compensation will be paid hereunder. 


  

	 	•	 	 The maximum total incentive compensation that you can earn hereunder is an amount equal to [xx]% of your base salary. 


  

	 	•	 	 Any incentive compensation payments earned will be paid in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and the Company’s practices, in a lump sum cash payment
after the financial results for 2009 have been finally determined and on or before March 15, 2010. 


 Unless the
Committee, in its discretion, determines otherwise, your rights to receive the incentive compensation earned hereunder will be forfeited if you are not still an employee of the Company on December 31, 2009. Consistent with the terms of the
Plan, the Committee may reduce the incentive compensation earned hereunder in its discretion if it deems appropriate. Notwithstanding anything else herein, no incentive compensation earned hereunder shall be paid until formally approved by the
Committee. The Company will withhold an appropriate amount from such incentive compensation for the payment of all applicable withholding taxes. 
  

			
	ManTech International Corporation
		
	By:	 	  

	Title:	 	  



 Term Sheet for Corporate Executive
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5




<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1997

<CASH>                                         28,704
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  189,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,458
<PP&E>                                         425,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 773,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          193,561
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     379,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   773,110
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,130,042
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,052,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (730)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                72,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                   30,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            41,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   41,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.63
        


</TABLE>