alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           246,041
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          597,078
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            622,666
<EQUITIES>                                      15,570
<MORTGAGE>                                       9,253
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   18,250
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,042,592
<CASH>                                          20,274
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               5,646
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         219,874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,558,921
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                961,124
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             71,150
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 166,111
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           16,077
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 44,733<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,222<F2>
<COMMON>                                        11,208<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,366<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,558,921
<PREMIUMS>                                     687,043
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             70,975
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               3,993
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  38,073
<BENEFITS>                                     475,817
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     69,199
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           223,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,754
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,968
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.85
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Includes short-term and long-term borrowings and convertible subordinated
debentures.
<F2>Redeemable preferred stock at par value.
<F3>Common stock at par value.
<F4>Includes additional paid in capital and retained earnings less unrealized
depreciation of securities and treasury stock.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT - 32.1

                     SITEWORKS BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT CO.,.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SiteWorks Building & Development
Co.,. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Carl Nurse, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and
      cash flows of the Company.

/s/ Carl Nurse
------------------------------------
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
June 1, 2006
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 04, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 04, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0210. JOSHUA CLARK v. JENNIFER CLARK.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2016D0996
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6099

ALLEN LEBEDUN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-1426)

Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 18, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allen Lebedun, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Allen Lebedun appeals from a district court order dismissing

without prejudice his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). The court dismissed Lebedun’s

petition because he failed to pay the filing fee as directed.

Because Lebedun may proceed with this action in the district court

by complying with the court’s order, his appeal is interlocutory

and not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v.

Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.

1993).

Accordingly, we deny Lebedun’s motion for relief from judgment, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6205

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT MARSHALL HOUSE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (5:96-cr-00174-BR-2; 5:05-cv-765-BR)

Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 20, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Marshall House, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer,

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Marshall House, Jr., a federal prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that House has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Chavis v Genesee County Jail,

No. 91018;

Court of Appeals No. 134817.
State of California 

AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

Executive Order R-11-001 

Relating to Amendments of the Airborne Toxic Contra/Measure for In-Use Diesel-Fueled 

Transport Refrigeration Units (TRU) and TRU Generator Sets, and Facilities where 

TRUs Operate 

WHEREAS, on November 18, 2010, the Air Resources Board (ARB or Board) conducted 

a public hearing to consider proposed amendments of the Airborne Toxic Control 

Measure for In-Use Diesel-Fueled TRUs and TRU Generator Sets, and Facilities where 

TRUs Operate, as set forth in the Initial Statement of Reasons released to the public on 

October 1, 2010; 

WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the Board adopted Resolution 10-39, in which 

the Board approved section 2477, title13, California Code of Regulations (Cal. Code. 

Regs.), as set forth in Attachment B thereto; 

WHEREAS, Resolution 10-39, directed the Executive Officer to determine if additional 

conforming modifications to the regulation are appropriate; and 

WHEREAS, the Executive Officer has determined that no further modifications are 

appropriate, and therefore takes final action to adopt the regulation as set forth in 

Attachment 1 hereto. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recitals and findings contained in 

Resolution 10-39 are incorporated herein. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that section 2477, title 13, Cal. Code Regs., is approved 

and adopted as set forth in Attachment 1 to this Order. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the adopted regulatory text may be further revised with 

nonsubstantial or grammatical changes, which will be added to the rulemaking record 

and indicated as such. 

drvcl Executed this ~ ~ day of Februarv 2011, at Sacramento, California. 

Attachment 

James N. Goldstene 

Executive Officer 

FEB 0 4 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANNIE L. NEAL,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Case No. 1:18-cv-214

 Judge Timothy S. Black

 Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 6) AND

TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate 

Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on November 16, 2018, submitted 

a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 6). No objections were filed.

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo 

all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in 

its entirety. 

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1) Judgment is entered in favor of the United States of America against Annie L. 

Neal in the amount of $10,340.30 through November 16, 2018. Additional 

interest will accrue from the date of judgment at the legal interest rate in effect 
2

on the date of judgment, computed daily and compounded annually until paid 

in full, in addition to costs of this action.

2) The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

12/11/18
Chemical Sector - Appendices 4-7

Elaine Manning to: Higgins, Cortney 11/15/2011 02:40 PM

Cc: Nick Parsons, Andrea Siefers, Dave Guinnup, Darcie Smith, Penny Lassiter

History: This message has been forwarded.

Here are the remaining appendices.

Thanks,

Elaine Manning

OAQPS, HEID

(919) 541-5499

Appendix 4.pdf Appendix 5.pdf Appendix 6.pdf Appendix 7.pdf
Case: 3:18-mj-00415-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:18-mj-00415-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page: 2 of 7 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 3:18-mj-00415-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page: 3 of 7 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 3:18-mj-00415-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page: 4 of 7 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:18-mj-00415-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page: 5 of 7 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:18-mj-00415-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page: 6 of 7 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:18-mj-00415-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page: 7 of 7 PAGEID #: 7
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
GENTA INCORPORATED

Pursuant to Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
* * * * *

Genta
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called the Corporation), does hereby certify as
follows:

FIRST:
The Corporations Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended by deleting
the first sentence of Article IV(A) and substituting in lieu thereof the
following:

| | (A)  Classes of Capital Stock.  The total number of shares of capital
  stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is one hundred and
  fifty-five million (155,000,000), of which one hundred and fifty million
  (150,000,000) shares shall be common stock, par value $.001 per share (the
  Common Stock), and five million (5,000,000) shares shall be preferred
  stock, par value $.001 per share (the Preferred Stock).
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SECOND:  The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in
accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

---

---

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Amendment on this
13th day of July, 2004.

| | GENTA
  INCORPORATED
| | --------------------
| |                     
| |                     
| | By:                 
| |                     
| |                     
| |                     

2

---

---
July 08 , 2015

US Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption Request

- Public Interest Statement for Docket No. FAA

2015

- 0629

Dear Sir or Madam:

In response to your letter dated June 29 th , I am submitting the following Public interest addendum per your request as required under 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Subpart A, Section 11.81 (d)&(e) :

How Prestige Aerials Request Will Benefit the Public As A Whole

Aerial photography and videograp hy for has been around for a long time through manned fixed

- wing aircraft and helicopters. The introduction of UAS increases public safety since size and lack of combustible fuel alleviates many of the potential threat s to the public inherent to full

- size aircraft . Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the public’s interest to integrate commercially flown UAS's into the National Airspace System, hence the passin g of the Reform Act. Granting Prestige Aerial’s exemption request furth ers the public int erest in the following ways:

1) Agricultural ly

– Specialized imagery obtained from our vehicles provides critical

on

- going and real

- time information on crop health allowing farmers to target problems in only specific areas of the crop

, reducing both water con sumption and pesticide use over traditional blanketed remediation efforts. 2) Inspections

– Photography from UAS used for inspection purposes mitigates many dangers to individuals working at height and in dangerous environments ; it further reduces downtime t hat could effect whole communities for high voltage utility and cellular tower inspections as these could now be performed while the system is live.

My ultra lightweight UAS is battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the environment. The con sequence of my ultra lightweight UAS crashing is far less than a full size helicopter or fixed wing aircraft; which are heavy, contain combustible fuel and can cause catastrophic devastation to the public.

Sincerely,

Matthew John son Founder, Prestige Aeria l
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23 (ii)


To the Board of Directors
General Electric Capital Services, Inc.

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
33-7348) on Form S-3 of General Electric Capital  Services,  Inc., of our report
dated  February 7, 1997,  relating to the  statement  of  financial  position of
General  Electric  Capital  Services,  Inc. and  consolidated  affiliates  as of
December  31, 1996 and 1995 and the related  statements  of current and retained
earnings  and cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended
December 31, 1996,  and related  schedules  which report appears in the December
31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of General Electric Capital Services, Inc.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 25, 1997
Exhibit 31.1 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

 

I, Richard E. Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 3, 2005 

 

 

18
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4612 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4612

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the procedures 
governing the closure or consolidation of postal branches and stations 
   shall be the same as those applicable in the case of post offices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2010

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the procedures 
governing the closure or consolidation of postal branches and stations 
   shall be the same as those applicable in the case of post offices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PROCEDURES RELATING TO POSTAL CLOSINGS AND 
              CONSOLIDATIONS.

    Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) For purposes of subsections (a)(3) and (d)--
            ``(1) the term `post office' includes a branch, station, or 
        other facility which--
                    ``(A) is operated by the Postal Service; and
                    ``(B) provides services to persons described in 
                paragraph (2); and
            ``(2) any reference in subsection (d) to the persons served 
        by a post office shall include any postal patrons receiving 
        mail delivery services from such post office, residents within 
        any ZIP code served by such post office, postal patrons having 
        post office boxes at such post office, and the relevant local 
        government officials (as defined under regulations of the 
        Postal Service).''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01563]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., January 19, 2022.\i\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \i\ By unanimous, recorded vote of the Board members of the 
Railroad Retirement Board, such Board members determined that agency 
business required that this meeting be called with less than one 
week notice. 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLACE: 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

(1) Internal Personnel Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephanie Hillyard, Secretary to 
the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: January 21, 2022.
Stephanie Hillyard,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-01563 Filed 1-24-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P