alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Lawrence Edward Thompson v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 1

- 00 705

- C R

Trial court case number: 1703989 & 1703989A

Trial court: 2 28 th District Court of Harris County

The trial court clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the following:

(1) Judgment dated April 13, 2021 in trial court cause number 1703989 (image no. 95289678) and (2) Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Seeking Relief from Final Felony Conviction

U nder Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07 dated September 21, 2021 in trial court cause number 1703989A (image no. 98016738)

.
See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 34.5(c)(1). The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in this Court within 15 days of this order.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature:

_____

/s/ Sherry Radack

______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date:

___ March 8, 2022

______
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4323-4324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01576]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11640]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Gilardi: Tappeto-Natura'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Gilardi: Tappeto-Natura'' at the 
Magazzino Italian Art Foundation, Cold Spring, New York, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of 
cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cebdabadbaa7a1a0fcfafbf78ebdbaafbaabe0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cab9afa9bea3a5a4f8fefff38ab9beabbeafe4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28,

[[Page 4324]]

2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-01576 Filed 1-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered June 3 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00482

- CV

ISRAEL GONZALEZ, Appellant

V.

MCKINNEY DODGE INC., ET AL., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Tria l Court Cause No. 429

- 00441

- 2013



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s May 30, 2014 motion for an extension of time to file a brief.

Appellant shall file his brief on or before June 30, 2014

.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2239

GINA M. FLORES-CLARIDY, on behalf of C.M.B., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District 

Judge. (2:07-cv-00278-RBS-JEB) 

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009 

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Gina M. Flores-Claridy, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Richard 

Leonard, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Gina M. Flores-Claridy appeals the district court’s 

order granting summary judgment to the Commissioner of Social 

Security upon the determination that substantial evidence 

supported the denial of Flores-Claridy’s application for 

insurance benefits on behalf of her son. The district court 

referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B)(2006). The magistrate judge recommended that 

relief be denied and advised Flores-Claridy that failure to file 

timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate 

review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. 

Despite this warning, Flores-Claridy failed to specifically 

object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. 

 The timely filing of specific objections to a 

magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve 

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when 

the parties have been warned of the consequences of 

noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th 

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). 

Flores-Claridy has waived appellate review by failing to timely 

file specific objections after receiving proper notice. 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

2 
3 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

 AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and the Chief Financial
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cost Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29,
2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Jane L. Baughman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Barry J. Feld                                                                                            
|Barry J. Feld Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)                            
|                                                                                                             
|April 5, 2011                                                                                                
|                                                                                                             
|/s/ Jane L. Baughman                                                                                         
|Jane L. Baughman Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
|                                                                                                             
|April 5, 2011
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 710 

Commemorating the High Holidays celebrated and commemorated by the 

Jewish people in the United States, in Israel, and around the world, 

and recognizing the many accomplishments and contributions of the 

Jewish community in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 

Mr. CRAMER (for himself and Ms. ROSEN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the High Holidays celebrated and commemorated by the Jewish people in the United States, 

in Israel, and around the world, and recognizing the 

many accomplishments and contributions of the Jewish 

community in the United States. 

Whereas the Jewish community in the United States has contributed in varied and significant ways to all areas of life 

in the United States since Jewish immigrants first arrived on the shores of the United States in 1654; 

Whereas, in 2020, the High Holidays recognized and celebrated by the Jewish people in the United States and 

around the world will begin on September 18, 2020, with 

Rosh Hashanah, and conclude on September 28, 2020, 

with Yom Kippur; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 710 IS 

Whereas Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, begins at 

sundown on September 18, 2020, the first day of Tishrei, 

5781 on the Hebrew calendar; 

Whereas Rosh Hashanah is also known as ‘‘Yom Teruah’’, 

the Day of Sounding of the Shofar, the ancient ram’s 

horn; 

Whereas the traditional greeting for Rosh Hashanah in Hebrew is ‘‘Shana Tova u’Metukah’’, which means ‘‘have a 

happy and sweet new year’’; 

Whereas Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, begins at sundown on September 27, 2020, the tenth day of Tishrei, 

5781 on the Hebrew calendar, and is the holiest day of 

the year for the Jewish people, who spend the day praying united as one people; and 

Whereas the traditional greeting for Yom Kippur in Hebrew 

is ‘‘G’mar Hatima Tova’’, which means ‘‘may you be inscribed in the book of life’’ and is an offering of a 

healthy, peaceful, and fulfilling year: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) demonstrates solidarity with, and support 

3 for, members of the Jewish community in the United 

4 States, in Israel, and throughout the world; 

5 (2) recognizes and celebrates the many accom6 plishments and contributions of the Jewish commu7 nity in the United States; 

8 (3) recommits to combating all forms of anti9 Semitism, which threaten Jews and non-Jews alike; 

10 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 710 IS 

1 (4) wishes the Jewish people of the United 

2 States and around the world a ‘‘Chag Sameach’’ 

3 (‘‘happy holidays’’ in Hebrew) and a sweet new year 

4 full of peace and prosperity. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

KRISSIE PURSLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Case No. 1:18-cv-256

 Judge Timothy S. Black

 Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 17) AND

TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the 

Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on June 20, 2019, 

submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 17). No objections were filed.

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo 

all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds that 

the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED, as that decision is supported by 

substantial evidence.

2. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: July 30, 2019 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1695

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
S. RANDOLPH SENGEL; DIETRA Y. TRENT; MARK R. WARNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-1) Submitted: July 21, 2004 Decided: August 4, 2004 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, O’CONNELL & SARSFIELD, Rockville, Maryland; Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration for lack of jurisdiction. We vacate the district court’s order and remand for consideration of the motion on the merits. After the district court dismissed Sindram’s complaint, Sindram timely noted an appeal. Subsequently, Sindram filed a motion construed by the district court as a motion for reconsideration. Believing that the notice of appeal divested it of jurisdiction to consider the motion, the district court denied the motion. This court has declared that “when a Rule 60(b) motion is filed while a judgment is on appeal, the district court has jurisdiction to entertain the motion, and should do so promptly.” Fobian v. Storage Tech. Corp. , 164 F.3d 887, 891 (4th Cir. 1999). In Fobian , this Court instructed as to the following when a Rule 60(b) motion is filed after an appeal has been noted: [i]f the district court determines that the motion is meritless, as experience demonstrates is often the case, the court should deny the motion forthwith; any appeal from the denial can be consolidated with the appeal from the underlying order. If the district court is inclined to grant the motion, it should issue a short memorandum so stating. The movant can then request a limited remand from this court for that purpose. By saving judicial resources and avoiding expense and delay, this procedure accords with the overarching mandate in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the rules “shall be construed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.”- 3 - Id.at 891. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order denying the motion for reconsideration and remand for consideration of the motion on the merits. In so doing, we express no opinion as to the merits of the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 1 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 2 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 3 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 4 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 5 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 6 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 7 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 8 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 9 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 10 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 11 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 12 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 13 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 14 of 15

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB     Document 82      Filed 11/15/2004     Page 15 of 15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

WILLIAM L. McGHEE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-212
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF District Judge Walter H. Rice
SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #15), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such

objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and

Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1.

2.

nee 114 Leen

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #15) is ADOPTED in full;
The Commissioner’s non-disability determination is REVERSED;

This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an immediate award of benefits; and

This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-11-0001069 20-SEP-2013 08:40 AM
From: Carlson, Sara <Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com>

Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:45 PM

To: Fortin, Kelly

Cc: Land, Eva; Grygar, Bill; Maness, Katie; Rahul Pendse

(rpendse@trinityconsultants.com)

Subject: Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

- Diamond BlackHornet PSD Pre

Construction and Title V Operating Permit Application Addendum

Attachments: FINAL BLACKHORNET Permit Modification Application Package.pdf

Hey Kelly,

Good afternoon. Attached is the addendum t o the Diamond BlackHornet PSD Pre

- Construction and Title

V Operating Permit application that was submitted to EPA in September 2013. A paper copy of the

addendum was mailed to the EPA today.

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Tha nks,

Sara Carlson

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Sr HSE Representative, Gulf of Mexico

Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com

832

- 636

- 1273 (office)

832

- 506

- 0888 (cell)

Click here for Anadarko’s Electronic Mail Disclaimer
ZuQuad1-2 BATTERY LOG

Date:___________________

BATTERY FLIGHT TIME

0001

0002

0003

0004

0005

0006

0007

0008

0009

0010

0011

0012

0013

SPARE

ZuHex BATTERY LOG

Date:___________________

BATTERY FLIGHT TIME

0015

0016

0017
State of New York

Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to 

revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 27 

The People &c.,

 Respondent,

 v.

Anthony Debellis, 

 Appellant.

Matthew Bova, for appellant.

R. Grace Phillips, for respondent.

Reargument ordered for a future Court session. Acting Chief Judge Cannataro and Judges 

Rivera, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Troutman concur.

Decided March 21, 2023
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Lincare Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Byrnes, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ JOHN P. BYRNESJohn P. Byrnes Chief Executive Officer




November 8, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Kenneth Y. Tanji,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated: September 4, 2009



/s/    Kenneth Y. TanjiName:

Kenneth Y. TanjiTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 5, 2022

No. 04-22-00178-CV

WEBB CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Appellant

v.

Robert MARSHALL and Amy Marshall,

Appellees

From the County Court At Law No 1, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CVK001053C1

Honorable Hugo Martinez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

appellant's brief is due on or before May 12, 2022.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of May, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court