alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund II (the
Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate
General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                                
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive Officer March 31, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8


                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                        NEW PLAN EXCEL REALTY TRUST, INC.
                       DIRECTORS', 1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                       (AMENDED AND RESTATED MAY 10, 1996)

         WHEREAS, New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. ("Company") previously
adopted the New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. Directors' 1994 Stock Option Plan
("Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the Board of Directors has reserved the
right to amend the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company desires to amend the
Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective February 17, 2000
as follows:

         1. The text of subsection (e) of Section 6 OPTION PROVISIONS is deleted
in its entirety, and the following is substituted therefor:

                  "Any option holder who ceases to be a director, whether
         because of death, resignation, removal, expiration of his or her term
         of office or any other reason, shall have the right to exercise the
         option for thirty (30) days after such event (but not after the
         expiration date of the option), at which time the option shall
         terminate and may no longer be exercised, except (i) in the event of
         the death of an option holder (x) who is at the time of his or her
         death a director of the Company and who has served as a director since
         the date of grant of the option, the option may be exercised at any
         time within one year following the date of death (but not after the
         expiration date of the option), by the option holder's estate or by a
         person who acquired the right to exercise the option by bequest or
         inheritance, or (y) within thirty (30) days after the termination of
         the option holder's status as a director of the Company, the option may
         be exercised at any time within six (6) months after the date of death
         (but in no event after the expiration date of the option) by the option
         holder's estate or by a person who acquired the right to exercise the
         option by bequest or inheritance, (ii) upon the option holder's ceasing
         to be a director by reason of disability he or she (or his or her
         guardian) shall have the right to exercise the option within one year
         after the date the option holder ceased to be a director (but not after
         the expiration date of the option); and (iii) as otherwise provided by
         the Committee."

         2. In all other respects the Plan, as amended, shall continue in full
force and effect.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

SUSAN HALE, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-238

 

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent Case)

Defendant.

ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD 

OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”)

(DOC. 20); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $6,500.00 IN EAJA FEES

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint 

stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal 

Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $6,500.00. Doc. 20. Based 

upon the parties’ stipulation in which they present no dispute that all requirements are met for the 

reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties’ joint stipulation (doc. 20); 

and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $6,500.00. As no further matters remain 

pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 11/1/2019 s/ Michael J. Newman 

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 2 of 10 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 3 of 10 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 4 of 10 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 5 of 10 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 6 of 10 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 7 of 10 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 8 of 10 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 9 of 10 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 1:18-cr-00089-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/18 Page: 10 of 10 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 3:18-mj-00399-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/29/18 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:18-mj-00399-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/29/18 Page: 2 of 9 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 3:18-mj-00399-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/29/18 Page: 3 of 9 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 3:18-mj-00399-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/29/18 Page: 4 of 9 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:18-mj-00399-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/29/18 Page: 5 of 9 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:18-mj-00399-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/29/18 Page: 6 of 9 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:18-mj-00399-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/29/18 Page: 7 of 9 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 3:18-mj-00399-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/29/18 Page: 8 of 9 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 3:18-mj-00399-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/29/18 Page: 9 of 9 PAGEID #: 9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

OBIE OBIE MASANGO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

OFFICER SCHWARTZ, 

Defendant. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:18-cv-161 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

NOTICE TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF OF MOTION TO DISMISS 

 You are hereby notified that Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 

14, 2019. (Doc. #20). You should receive a copy of the Motion directly from Defendant. 

 Your response must be filed with the Court not later than December 9, 2019. If 

you fail to file a timely response, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss may be granted and 

your case dismissed. 

November 15, 2019 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington

 United States Magistrate Judge
#### Dewey FRANKUM, Appellant, v. Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee.

No. 9768.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 2,1965.

Decided March 24, 1965.

Glyn Dial Ellis, Logan, W. Va., for appellant.

Lawrence R. Schneider, Atty., Dept, of Justice (John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sherman L. Cohn, Atty., Dept, of Justice, and George D. Beter, Acting U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and HUTCHESON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Social Security disability insurance ■benefits were sought by Dewey C. Fra-n-kum but denied by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. The Secretary found that the claimant had not established that he was “ineapable of performing his prior, usual or regular work” and consequently that he had failed to prove that he was incapable of “engaging in any substantial gainful activity”, a prerequisite for success under the Act. §§ 223(c) (2) and 216(i), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423(c) (2) and 416 (i).

*427Upon consideration of the record and the arguments of counsel, orally and on brief, we cannot say that the District Court was clearly erroneous, within the intendment of Rule 52(a) Fed.R.Civ.P., in concluding that the Secretary was not without substantial evidence to support his decision. § 205(g), 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g).

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, 

INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA 

MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

This document relates to: 

Milanesi v. C.R. Bard, 

Case No. 2:18-cv-01320

 Case No. 2:18-md-2846

 JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

MOTIONS IN LIMINE ORDER NO. 20

Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine (“MIL”) No. 14 and Plaintiffs’ MIL No. 15

Plaintiffs Antonio Milanesi and Alicia Morz de Milanesi and Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. 

and Davol, Inc. filed various motions to exclude evidence in the context of the first bellwether 

trial, Johns v. C.R. Bard, et al., S.D. Ohio No. 2:18-cv-1509, and have filed in this second 

bellwether case, Milanesi, to preserve the issue for appeal. 

(1) Plaintiffs’ MIL No. 14 to Exclude Evidence of the ISO Standards / Guidelines to 

Support Legal Theories or Establish the Product’s Safety and Efficacy. A duplicate of this

motion was filed on this issue in the first bellwether case, Johns, which was denied. (Johns MIL 

Order No. 4, Johns ECF No. 355.) For the same reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion in 

Limine No. 14. (ECF No. 209)

(2) Plaintiffs’ MIL No. 15 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Relating to the Hospital’s 

Surgical Consent Forms. A duplicate of this motion was filed on this issue in Johns, which was 

denied. (Johns MIL Order No. 3, Johns ECF No. 332.) For the same reasons, the Court 

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 576 Filed: 12/02/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 7389
2

DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 15. (ECF No. 205.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12/2/2021 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:18-md-02846-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 576 Filed: 12/02/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 7390
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Element 21 Golf Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), we, Nataliya Hearn, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, and David Khazak,
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section     1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.














Date: September 28, 2009
By:
/s/ Nataliya HearnNataliya Hearn, Ph.D.President, Chief Executive Officer and Director





Date: September 28, 2009
By:
/s/ David KhazakDavid KhazakChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>




FRONTIER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.          1996 FORM 10-K             EXHIBIT 22(a)




                        LIST OF REGISTRANTS SUBSIDIARIES


The  following  is a  list  of  Registrant's  subsidiaries,  all  of  which  are
wholly-owned.


                                                     State of Jurisdiction
                Name                                   and Incorporation
------------------------------------------           ----------------------


Frontier Insurance Company                                  New York


Medical Professional Liability Agency, Ltd.                 New York


Pioneer Claim Management, Inc.                              New York


Frontier Pacific Insurance Company                         California


Spencer Douglass Insurance Associates                      California


United Capitol Holding Company                              Delaware


United Capitol Insurance Company                            Wisconsin


Olympic Underwriting Managers, Inc.                          Georgia


Fischer Underwriting Group, Inc.                           New Jersey


Regency Financial Corporation                               Delaware


Regency Insurance Company                                North Carolina


Emrol Installment Premium Discount, Inc.                 North Carolina

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,562
<SECURITIES>                                 1,070,479
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           8,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,553,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        249,382
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,016
<OTHER-SE>                                     700,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,553,632
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,982
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    98
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,036)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,880)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,844
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (0)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (0)
<CHANGES>                                          (0)
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,844
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
December 13, 2013

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

400 7th Street SW, Plaza 401 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption No. 5400J, (Docket No. FAA-2001-10676) 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR §11.81, Airlines for America1(A4A) 

on behalf of its member airlines and other similarly situated Part 121 certificate holders, 

petitions for an extension of Exemption No. 5400J (Docket No. FAA-2001-10676). This 

exemption will expire on January 31, 2014. 

Exemption No. 5400J permits A4A member airlines and other similarly situated Part 121 air 

carriers to use a Phase II (Level C) simulator for pilot in command (PIC) training and checking in 

accordance with the requirements of Part 121, Appendix H, amended, provided certain 

conditions and limitations are met. Also, under the terms of the exemption, upgrade training 

and the certification check required by 14 CFR §61.157 can be accomplished in a Phase II 

simulator. 

The conditions and circumstances, in regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, 

which warranted the original grant of exemption, continue to exist. This exemption and its 

predecessors, Exemption No. 5400, have been in use for almost 20 years with no known 

compromise of safety. 

The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. A4A believes that there is just cause 

to waive the requirement of public notice of this petition. There is no substantial change to the 

exemption and the renewal of this exemption is not precedent setting, therefore, A4A requests 

that publication in the Federal Register be waived as unnecessary. 

 

1

The Member airlines are: Air Tran Airways, Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, ASTAR Air Cargo, 

Atlas Air, Continental Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Evergreen International Airlines, Federal 

Express, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, United Parcel 

Service, Co., and US Airways. The Associate members are: Air Canada and Air Jamaica.
A summary of this petition is included (Attachment 1) as required by 14 CFR §11.81. 

If any further information is required, please call me at 202-626-4285

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Donald Dillman

Director – Operations 

Airlines for America

1301 Pennsylvania Ave, NW 

Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 200004 

Attachment 1: Summary of Petition
Attachment 1

December 10, 2013

Docket No. FAA-2001-10676 

Summary of ATA Petition 

Petitioner: Airlines for America (A4A)

Regulation Affected: 14 CFR §61.157 

14 CFR §121 Appendix H 

Description of Relief Sought: Renew Exemption 5400J with no other changes to the existing 

terms except to extend its termination date. This allows Part 121 operators to use a Phase II 

(Level C) simulator for pilot in command (PIC) training and checking in accordance with the 

requirements of Part 121, appendix H, provided certain conditions and limitations are met.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

KRISTINA N. THOMPSON, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-214

vs.

VILLAGE OF PHILLIPSBURG, OHIO, et al., District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Defendants.

_________________________________________________________________________________

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND THE 

PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER (DOC. 58); AND (2) SETTING 

FORTH AN AMENDED PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to amend the Preliminary Pretrial 

Conference Order. Doc. 58. A memorandum in opposition was filed by Defendants Mark Wysong 

and the Village of Phillipsburg. Doc. 53. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a reply. Doc. 58. For good cause 

shown, and in the interest of justice, the undersigned GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion (doc. 58) and sets 

the following dates and deadlines:

Plaintiff’s expert disclosures: March 30, 2020

Defendants’ expert disclosures: May 1, 2020

Discovery deadline: June 1, 2020

Telephone status conference with Judge Rose: July 2, 2020 at 10:30 am

Dispositive motion deadline: July 15, 2020

Final pretrial conference (in chambers): March 11, 2021 at 2:30 pm

Jury trial: April 19, 2021 at 9:00 am

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: January 21, 2020 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
#### People v Pounds,

No. 91096;

Court of Appeals No. 122694.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     249,786
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              8,338,242
<ALLOWANCES>                               107,858
<INVENTORY>                                588,662
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           9,974,708
<PP&E>                                     62,037,086
<DEPRECIATION>                             14,224,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             57,787,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      18,666,639
<BONDS>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   18,492
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                 9,073,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               57,787,391
<SALES>                                    46,548,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           46,548,356
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           43,587,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           102,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,421,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            436,678
<INCOME-TAX>                               165,938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        270,740
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               270,740
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .15
        

</TABLE>