alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Kaia Khamisi,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:18cv112

State of Ohio, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Respondents.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate 

Judge on February 22, 2018 (Doc. 2). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including 

notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and 

Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). 

No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2) of the 

Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without 

prejudice to refiling once Petitioner has exhausted all available state court remedies and consistent 

with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge.

Any request for certificate of appealability or request to certify an appeal would not be 

taken in good faith and would be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 28,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerOctober 29, 2007
The State



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San A ntonio, Texas**  Monday, February 23, 2015
N o. 04

- 14

- 00571

- CR
Lawrence Steele TERRILL , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas Trial Court No. 10

- 04

- 10391

- CR The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, J udge Presiding 

### ORDER The State’s brief was originally due to be filed with this court on January 12, 2015

. We granted the State’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief until February 11, 2015

. On February 20, 2015 , the State filed its second motion for extension of time to file its brief . It requested a thirty

- day extension for a total extension of sixty days. The State’s motion is GRANTED. The State’s brief must be filed with this court not la ter than March 13, 2015

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE GR ANTED
.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and aff ixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
### UNITED STA**TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A** **GENCY** WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

### February 13, 2012 Docket Number: EPA - HQ- OPP - 2011 - 0539 www.regulations.gov 

### Errata Sheet for the d **- Phenothrin Sum**  **mary Document (**  **12/19/2011 )**  In the version of the d - phenothrin Summary Document which was posted in the public docket, the bullet beginning at the bottom of page 7 is missing several words of text. The corrected bullet is provided here with the missing te xt underlined . This typographical error will be corrected in the Final Workplan for d - phenothrin.

 The uncertainty factor (UF) for d - phenothrin for the RED was 100 0 X for adults ( 10X for inter - species extrapolation, 10 X for intra - species variation , and 10 X for database uncertainty factor for the inadequate toxicology database i.e., absence of acceptable neurotoxicity studies) . Under FQPA, the Agency is required to apply a 10X safety factor (SF) to be protective of infants and children unless there are dat a to support a reduction or removal. However, EPA’s current position is that there is sufficient evidence to reduce the FQPA SF to 1X for adults and 3X for children <6 years of age. The 3X is based on age - dependent - pharmacokinetics and is further support ed by physiologically - based pharmacokinetic (PK) model predictions of a 3 - fold increase of pyrethroid concentration in juvenile target tissue compared to adults. A more complete description of the Agency’s reasoning behind a 3X FQPA SF for children can be found at www.regulations.gov ; EPA - HQ- OPP - 2011 - 0746 - 0011. These UFs are subject to review and possible revision during the registration review.
EXHIBIT
      32.1








SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER








In
      connection with the Annual Report of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, (the "Report")
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Robert W. Weaver,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange  Act
      of
      1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial  condition
      and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      March 14, 2007





/s/
      Robert W. Weaver


Robert
      W.
      Weaver


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


(chief
      executive officer)
#### Jimmie McKine *v.*State

5246

413 S. W. 2d 860

Opinion delivered April 4, 1967

[Rehearing denied May 15, 1967.]

*Floyd G. Rogers,*for appellant.

*Joe Purcell,*Attorney General; *Don Langston,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CaRletoN Harris, Chief Justice.

Jimmie McKine, appellant herein, was convicted of the charge of Driving "While Intoxicated (second offense) in the Municipal Court of the City of Fort Smith, Arkansas. He appealed to the Circuit Court of Sebastian County (Fort Smith District), and was found guilty by a jury, sentenced to ten days in the County Jail, fined $250.00, and his driver’s license suspended for a period of one year. From the judgment so entered, McKine brings this, appeal.

We are unable to consider this appeal on its merits, for though the transcript has been thoroughly explored, no order granting the appeal by the Circuit Court is shown. This is a requirement of the law. Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 43-2708 and 43-2709 (Repl. 1964). See also *McConnell v. State,*227 Ark. 988, 302 S. W. 2d 805.

It might be added, however, that a majority of the court would also affirm the case on the merits.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.44


                                                March 27, 2000



      Mr. Steven Siegel
      c/o New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.
      1120 Avenue of the Americas
      New York, New York  10036

Re:   Employment Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of September 25, 1998,
by and between Steven Siegel ("Executive") and New Plan Excel Realty Trust,
Inc. (the "Company")


Dear Mr. Siegel:

In reference to the Employment Agreement and in connection with the replacement
of Arnold Laubich as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, please be advised
that the Company is hereby providing you with written notice of two automatic
one year renewals under the Agreement. Accordingly, the "Employment Period"
under the Agreement shall continue through December 31, 2003, subject to the
extension provisions contained in Section 2 of the Agreement.

                                              Sincerely,

                                              New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.


                                              By: /s/ Glenn J. Rufrano
                                                  ------------------------------

                                              Name: Glenn J. Rufrano
                                                    ----------------------------

                                              Its: CEO
                                                   ----------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28560]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 12, 2022, at 9:30 a.m.; Wednesday, 
January 12, 2022, at 4:00 p.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza SW, in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

STATUS: Wednesday, January 12, 2022, at 9:30 a.m.--Closed. Wednesday, 
January 12, 2022, at 4:00 p.m.--Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Wednesday, January 12, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial and Operational Matters.
    3. Administrative Items.

Wednesday, January 12, 2022, at 4:00 p.m. (Open)

    1. Remarks of the Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.
    3. Board Leadership.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael J. Elston, Secretary of 
the Board of Governors, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, 
Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-28560 Filed 12-30-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Kevin A. Schmidt, Principal Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Neffs Bancorp, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;     (b) intentionally omitted;     (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based upon such evaluation; and     (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
49

 
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 26, 2007 By:  /s/ Kevin A. Schmidt   Principal Financial Officer      
50
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

GLASSCO FAIRROW, 

 Petitioner, : Case No. 3:18-cv-232 

 District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

- vs - Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

WARDEN, Correctional Reception Center, 

 Respondent. : 

RECOMMITTAL ORDER 

 

This case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Objections (ECF No. 6) to the Magistrate 

Judge’s Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 2). 

The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be 

more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with 

instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations 

based on that analysis. 

August 16, 2018. *s/Thomas M. Rose 

Thomas M. Rose 

United States District Judge
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

 

I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 1, 2005
#### Clark *v.*Deupree.

Opinion delivered May 28, 1928.

*387
      *G. G. Pope*and *Will Steel,*for appellant.

*Frcmk S. Quinn,*for appellee.

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It will be observed from onr. statement of facts that the testimony relative to the first contract between the parties is in direct and irreconcilable conflict. On the part of the plaintiffs it is shown that Mrs. Denpree had agreed to sell them the land for the price of $3,'250, and that they had paid down in cash $200 of the purchase price, and were ready to pay the balance when Mrs. Denpree should pay some back taxes, amounting to $831, as she had agreed to do under her contract. On the other hand, according to the evidence for the defendants, Mrs. Deupree had sold her interest in the land for the net price of $2,500, and Mrs. Deupree had executed a deed to the plaintiffs for her interest in the land, with that sum as a consideration, which plaintiffs refused to accept. It was understood at the time that Quinn, as her attorney, had also an interest in the land, which was not considered in the purchase of Mrs. Deupree’s interest, and for which he was to receive $1,000.

The conclusion we have reached renders it unnecessary to pass upon these disputed questions of fact.

According to the testimony of Frank S. Quinn, which is uncontradicted, he was not the agent of Mrs. Deupree for the sale of the land. He had merely been her attorney in former litigation regarding the land, and only assured the plaintiffs that. she would ratify any contract he would make with them relative to the sale of the land. .Hence, assuming that he did enter into the contract as claimed, or as testified to by the plaintiffs, Mrs. Deupree refused to execute such a contract, when informed of its terms. The mere fact that Quinn had been attorney for Mrs. Deupree in former litigation relative to the land did not make him her agent to sell the land; and, as we have already seen, according to his testimony, which is not contradicted on this point, he did not attempt to sell the land as *388agent for Mrs. Deupree. Therefore conceding, without deciding, that the first contract was as testified to by the plaintiffs, such contract was not binding upon Mrs. Deupree, and was never ratified by her.

The plaintiffs testified that, as a matter of compromise, they had agreed to give $3,500 for the land. After the court had made its finding against them, they made a tender of $3,300 to the defendants, which, with the $200 already paid, would amount to $3,500. The court held that this tender came too late, and we think it was right in so holding. The plaintiffs had refused all the way through to pay $3,500 for the land, and in the meantime the defendants had entered into a binding contract with other parties to sell the land to them..

It follows that the decree of the chancery court was correct, and it will therefore be affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2165

In Re: MICHAEL D. WILKINS,

Debtor.

MICHAEL D. WILKINS,

Debtor - Appellant,

versus

JAMES MURRAY; ANZILIA W. MURRAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-00-840-3, BK-99-34315-SCS, 00-3024-AP, 00-

3048-AP, 00-3060-AP, 00-3075-AP, 00-3139-AP, 00-3163-AP)

Submitted: February 25, 2002 Decided: March 12, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce H. Matson, Troy

Savenko, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Wilkins appeals from the district court’s orders

affirming the bankruptcy court’s resolution of his objection to

Appellees’ amended proof of claim and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s

orders, and the bankruptcy court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Wilkins v. Murray, Nos. CA-00-840-3; BK-99-34315-SCS (E.D.

Va. July 12, 2001; July 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SERVED: MARCH 19, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EXECUTIVE FLITEW A YS, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2013-1085 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012S0950377) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. _./ .. -·-, ,.~,,r• 

Attachment - Service List 

_/ 

/ 

'-. .... ,..,.------··· ,.--- . onnie A. Yoder / 

Chief Administrat~.fe Law Judge 

// / ...... // 

(_,.-/ 

,/7 

I 
·Docket No. FAA-2013-1085 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

. ONECOPY 

John W. Grillo, President 

Executive Fliteways, Inc., Respondent 

One Clark Drive 

Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 

Kenneth S. Gray, Respondent's Representative 

Director of Operations, Executive Fliteways, Inc. 

One Clark Drive 

Ronkonkoma,, NY 11779 

TEL: 631-588-3480 ext. 128 

FPC(: 631-588-5527 

Michael F. McKinley, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7100 

FPC(: 202-267-5106 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FPC(: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-