alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:17-mj-00761-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 45
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:17-mj-00761-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 46
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3281

_____________________________

LATOYA HOLSEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark J. Borello, Judge.

January 12, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Latoya Holsey, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4435 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4435

 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit any national 
securities exchange from effecting any transaction in a security issued 
    by a corporation unless the corporation's registration with the 
exchange includes a certification that the corporation currently is in 
compliance with the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
  1971 governing contributions and expenditures by corporations which 
       were in effect with respect to elections held during 2008.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2010

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit any national 
securities exchange from effecting any transaction in a security issued 
    by a corporation unless the corporation's registration with the 
exchange includes a certification that the corporation currently is in 
compliance with the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
  1971 governing contributions and expenditures by corporations which 
       were in effect with respect to elections held during 2008.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING TRANSACTIONS ON NATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGES IN 
              SECURITIES OF CORPORATIONS NOT CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH 
              EXISTING RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND 
              EXPENDITURES.

    (a) Registration.--Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(4) If the issuer is a corporation, a statement 
        certifying that the issuer is in compliance with section 316 of 
        the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 with respect to 
        contributions and expenditures made by the corporation in the 
        most recent quarter and year, as such section applied with 
        respect to elections held in 2008.''.
    (b) Periodic Reports.--Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)) is amended--
            (1) at the end of paragraph (1), by striking the period and 
        inserting a semicolon;
            (2) at the end of paragraph (2), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) the statement required under section 12(b)(4).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to transactions effected on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of HF Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thenine months ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis L. Hage, Chairman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|   |    /s/  Curtis L. Hage                            |                                                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Curtis  L. Hage, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                             |
|   |                                                             |
|   | Date:                                                            |         May  14, 2003 |   |
|        |                                                                  |                                                               |  |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to H.F. FinancialCorp. and will be retained by H.F. Financial Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Barry J. Feld, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cost Plus, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: May 17, 2012



/s/ Barry J. FeldBarry J. FeldChief Executive Officer, President (Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0030 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WELCH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 7, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 31 2022

08/31/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0030
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, 

LLC; AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

FALLS AT HIDDEN CANYON 

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; 

ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES, 

LLC, 

Defendants.

No. 18-15837 

D.C. No. 

2:15-cv-01287-RCJ-NJK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 10, 2019**

Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Before: BEA, COLLINS, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Las Vegas Development Group, LLC and Airmotive Investments, LLC appeal 

the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Nationstar Mortgage LLC. 

We assume familiarity with the facts and procedural history and discuss them only 

as necessary to explain our decision. 

The district court granted summary judgment to Nationstar based solely on

the ground that, under Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 832 F.3d 

1154 (9th Cir. 2016), the homeowners’ association (HOA) foreclosed under a 

facially unconstitutional notice scheme. Id. at 1156. The Ninth Circuit recently 

held, however, that Nevada’s HOA foreclosure scheme is not facially 

unconstitutional because our decision in Bourne Valley was based on a construction 

of Nevada law that the Nevada Supreme Court has since made clear was erroneous. 

See Bank of Am., N.A. v. Arlington W. Twilight Homeowners Ass’n, 920 F.3d 620, 

623–24 (9th Cir. 2019) (recognizing that Bourne Valley “no longer controls the 

analysis” in light of SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon, 422 

P.3d 1248 (Nev. 2018)). 

The judgment in favor of Nationstar is therefore REVERSED. The case is 

remanded for further proceedings consistent with this memorandum disposition, 

including as to whether Nationstar’s predecessor-in-interest properly tendered the 
3 

superpriority amount of the HOA’s lien and, if not, whether the failure to tender was

nonetheless excused. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

SARA HAWES

Plaintiff,

vs.

MACY’S WEST STORES, INC.,

Defendant. 

:

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-00754

Judge Timothy S. Black

ORDER TEMPORARILY GRANTING MOTION (DOC. 109) FOR LEAVE TO

FILE UNDER SEAL

This civil action is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to file documents under a 

temporary seal (Doc. 109) pursuant to the protective order in this case. (Doc. 71). In 

order to seal court records, a district court must set forth specific findings and 

conclusions which justify filing documents under seal. See Shane Grp. Inc. v. Blue Cross 

Blue Shield, 825 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir. 2016). The Court cannot make such a finding at 

this time, thus the Court TEMPORARILY GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file the materials 

described in the motion (Doc. 109) under seal. See Local Rule 5.2.1. Pursuant to the 

protective order, any party seeking to maintain the seal will submit a written motion to 

restrict public access on or before 8/4/21. (See Doc. 71 , Section 8(d)). Any opposition to 

the motion shall be filed within 14 days of the filing of the written motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

7/20/2021 s/Timothy S. Black

Case: 1:17-cv-00754-TSB Doc #: 110 Filed: 07/20/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 2200
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

KAREN RIGHTER-MALESKO, : Case No. 3:18-cv-126

Plaintiff, : District Judge Walter H. Rice

: Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
vs. :

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY

ee

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of
Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
(Doc. #14). Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees
in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00) in full satisfaction and
settlement of any and all claims for fees, expenses, and costs that Plaintiff may have
under the EAJA in the above case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and not
Plaintiff's attorney, and can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the
United States pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010).

After the court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that
Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the
award be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to an EAJA assignment duly

signed by Plaintiff.


IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The Parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees under
the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #14) is accepted and the
Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees, costs, and
expenses in the total amount of $5,000.00;

2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this
Decision _and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-
existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such
pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award
directly to Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment

signed by Plaintiff; and
3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 4-18-17? CR

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

p0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148004 & (23)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148004

COA: 314214

Washtenaw CC: 99-012281-FC

LOROASO A. TRAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

appointment of counsel is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3112-3113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Population Sciences Study Section.
    Date: March 7, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B 
Rockledge Drive, Room 2121B, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Video Assisted 
Meeting).

[[Page 3113]]

    Contact Person: Christiane M. Robbins, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes 
of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2121B, Bethesda, MD 20817, 
301-451-4989, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99faebf6fbfbf0f7ead9f4f8f0f5b7f7f0f1b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c6a5b4a9a4a4afa8b586aba7afaae8a8afaee8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 14, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-01029 Filed 1-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4139 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7464 Highway 503 in Hickory, Mississippi, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant Matthew L. Ingram Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4139 EH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT MATTHEW L. INGRAM POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 7464 Highway 503 in Hickory, 

4 Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ser5 geant Matthew L. Ingram Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Matthew 

10 L. Ingram Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 13, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4139 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostIngram Post Office’’. ory, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Sergeant Matthew L. al Service located at 7464 Highway 503 in Hick-
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-32734) and in the related prospectus and Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 Numbers 333-86155 and 333-86154) pertaining to the 1995
Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, and the
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Molecular Devices Corporation of our report
dated January 18, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Molecular Devices Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Palo Alto, CA
March 28, 2000
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)   In connection with the Report of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ron Howell, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: April 4, 2014By:\s\ Ron HowellRon HowellChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending July 3, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard E. LundinRichard E. LundinChief Executive OfficerAugust 5, 2009




25
#### Kenneth SNELLING *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 74-131

519 S.W. 2d 52

February 10, 1975

PER CURIAM

The appellant, Kenneth Snelling, was identified by police Officer Sparks as the one who sold and delivered to him controlled substance in violation of Act 590 of 1971 (Uniform Controlled Substance Act).

The appellant’s brother Garry, testified that one Steve Welton had the drugs in his apartment; that he and the appellant took Officer Sparks to Steve’s apartment; that Steve was “barbed out” and at Steve’s request, the appellant got the drugs for Sparks and delivered the drugs to him. He said he saw the appellant hand the money to Steve.

The appellant testified that the transaction was actually between Officer Sparks and Steve and that fifty cents per capsule was agreed upon through price negotiation for large quantities. He said that Steve was pretty high on the drug and that Steve asked him to get the drugs and give them to Sparks. He said he did get the drugs and give them to Officer Sparks and that he took $12.50 for the drugs and gave it to Steve.

The appellant was represented by the Public Defender at the trial and was sentenced to three years in the penitentiary.

*603On appeal to this court the Public Defender has made a motion pursuant to *Anders*v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967) that the appeal to this court has no merit. The Attorney General has submitted a brief and agrees with the Public Defender. We agree with both of them and affirm the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.