alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fred Lee ORR *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 74-13

508 S.W. 2d 731

Opinion delivered May 13, 1974

*Charles A. Banks,*Public Defender, for appellee.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Alston Jennings, Jr.,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant was convicted in 1972 of assault with intent to kill and sentenced to twenty-one years. From a denial of any relief under his Rule I petition he appeals.

Appellant first contends it was error not to give him a preliminary hearing. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-601 (Repl. 1964). *548We have many times held the statute granting a preliminary hearing in a case of arrest without a warrant is directory and not mandatory. *Ellingburg*v. State, 254 Ark. 199, 492 S.W. 2d 904 (1973). Furthermore, appellant does not allege any prejudice.

He next contends he was arrested without a warrant. Such an arrest is proper when there are reasonable grounds for believing a felony has been committed. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-403 (Repl. 1964). Appellant readily admitted he committed the homicide so the officer certainly had reasonable grounds to make the arrest without a warrant. Also, appellant went to trial without making known his objection; that fact constituted a waiver. *Ellingburg*v. *State, Supra.*

Finally appellant urges he had ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant does not set out specific allegations. He makes the conclusionary statement that the attorney did not handle the case to the best of his ability, and “I can tell when a person is really trying and when he isn't”. Attorney Dan Burge is a respected member of the Blytheville bar and has been so for more than twenty years. Although his work is primarily in the civil field he said he had been appointed in “from six to ten criminal cases a year since I have been practicing”. He conceded he was not entirely happy about representing appellant under court appointment. That was because the appellant while out on bond had a steady job for several months. Nevertheless, Burge testified that he represented appellant, and free of charge, to the best of his ability. He said he had eight days in which to get ready for trial. The attorney obtained from the police department the complete file on appellant's investigation. He said he went over the whole file with appellant and issued subpoenas for four witnesses. He said he was as well prepared under the circumstances of the case as he would ever have been. He said appellant admitted the killing but insisted on claiming self-defense, which defense the attorney felt to be very weak. The record is completely void of any evidence that appointed counsel failed to meet the standards set out in *Franklin*v. State, 251 Ark. 223, 471 S.W. 2d 760 (1971).

Affirmed.

FOGLEMAN, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,118,790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    161,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,306,029
<PP&E>                                       1,197,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                 522,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,014,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,893,087
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       200,966
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,085,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,014,866
<SALES>                                         61,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,900
<CGS>                                           15,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,881,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             728,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,483,458
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,485,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,485,058
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                            Exhibit 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-
38520 of Forstmann & Company, Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports dated January 26,
1996 (which express an unqualified opinion and include an explanatory paragraph
relating to uncertainties as to the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Forstmann & Company,
Inc. for the year ended October 29, 1995.



/S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
----------------------------





Atlanta, Georgia
February 12, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEETS  AND  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF
     OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
     QUARTER  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            6,781,453
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4,533,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                         786,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 12,349,204
<PP&E>                                            2,737,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (2,736,296)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19,385,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7,973,308
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                             704
<COMMON>                                              4,459
<OTHER-SE>                                        9,447,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19,385,577
<SALES>                                           3,458,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3,508,936
<CGS>                                             2,339,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12,363,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  249,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (18,926,044)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (4.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
                                               


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

YANJUN XU,

 a/k/a Xu Yanjun,

 a/k/a Qu Hui,

 a/k/a Zhang Hui,

 Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO. 1:18-CR-0043

JUDGE TIMOTHY S. BLACK

GOVERNMENT NOTICE OF 

EX PARTE, IN CAMERA, 

UNDER SEAL FILING

The government provides notice that on January 24, 2020, it filed an ex parte, in camera, 

and under seal motion (the redacted caption page for which is attached) with the Court.

Respectfully submitted,

DAVID M. DEVILLERS

United States Attorney

s/Timothy S. Mangan

TIMOTHY S. MANGAN (0069287)

EMILY N. GLATFELTER (0075576)

Assistant United States Attorneys

221 East Fourth Street, Suite 400

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Office: (513) 684-3711

Fax: (513) 684-6385

E-mail: timothy.mangan@usdoj.gov

emily.glatfelter@usdoj.gov

Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 82 Filed: 01/27/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 671
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been electronically served via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system upon defense counsel, this 27th day of January, 2020.

s/Timothy S. Mangan

TIMOTHY S. MANGAN (0069287)

Assistant United States Attorney

Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 82 Filed: 01/27/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 672
p. 1 

~ Aftory C H E M I C A L 

March 3, 2011 

3336b8 ~~/'05,j/ 

RECEIVED 

'(l . RECD MAR 1 5 2011 

I I MAR -8 AM 6: 00 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution, Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

Document Control Officer (7407 M) 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave ., NW 

Washington, DC 20430-0001 

Attention : TSCA Section 4 

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

Subject: Letter of Intent to Test - TSCA Section 4 Final Rule 

To Whom It May Concern: 

This letter is in reference to Federal Register Volume 76, Number 5 published January 

7, 2011 (Federal Register Notice) concerning the testing of certain HPV Chemicals. 

This is to inform you that Afton Chemical Corporation (Afton) is a Tier 1 manufacturer of 

castor oil, sulfated, sodium salt (CASRN 68187-76-8) and that Afton intends to test this 

substance as indicated in the Federal Register Notice for all tests specified by EPA for 

this chemical substance (attached) . 

When all letters of intent to test are published in the public docket, Afton intends to 

contact other Tier 1 Manufacturers/Importers that may be common to this chemical 

substance regarding completion of the full set of specified testing . 

If you require any further information, please feel free to contact me. 

impq~pimpq~iupi~iMipu2 

Sincerely, 

Mark S . Grenda 

Regulatory Affairs 

Attachment CONTAINS NO CBI 

500 Spring Street " Richmond, Virginia 23219 " tel : 804 .788 .6035 " fax: 804.788.6038 " Mark. Grenda @AftonChemical .com 

Afton Chemical Corporation 
Attachment - Afton Letter of Intent to Test 

Tier 1 Testing requirements for Castor Oil, sulfated, sodium salt (CAS 68187-76-8) 

1 . Melting Point: ASTM E 324-99; if a Freezing Point: OECD 102 

2. Boiling Point: ASTM E 1719-05 

3. Aquatic toxicity: 

a . Chronic Toxicity to Daphnia: ASTM E 1193-97 

b . Toxicity to Plants (Algae) : ASTM E 1218-04 

4. Mammalian toxicity, acute, EITHER: 

a . Acute (Up/Down) Oral Toxicity (rat) : ASTM E 1163-98 OR 

b . Acute (Up/Down) Oral Toxicity (rat) : OECD 425 

5. Mammalian toxicity, genotox: 

a . Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test: 40 CFR 799.9510 AND 

b . Any one of the following: 

i . In vitro Mammalian Chrom Ab: 40 CFR 799 .9537 (preferred) OR 

(must justify) 

ii . Mammalian Bone Marrow Chrom Ab : 40 CFR 799.9538 

OR 

iii . Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test: 40 CFR 799.9539 

6. Mammalian toxicity, repeated dose/reproduction/ developmental : 

a . Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the 

Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test: 40 CFR 799.9365 

OR (must justify) 

b . Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test: 40 CFR 799.9355 

AND 

c. Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in rodents : 40 CFR 799.9305
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 106
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 2 of 16 PAGEID #: 107
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 3 of 16 PAGEID #: 108
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 4 of 16 PAGEID #: 109
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 5 of 16 PAGEID #: 110
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 6 of 16 PAGEID #: 111
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 7 of 16 PAGEID #: 112
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 8 of 16 PAGEID #: 113
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 9 of 16 PAGEID #: 114
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 10 of 16 PAGEID #: 115
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 11 of 16 PAGEID #: 116
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 12 of 16 PAGEID #: 117
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 13 of 16 PAGEID #: 118
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 14 of 16 PAGEID #: 119
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 15 of 16 PAGEID #: 120
Case: 3:18-cr-00079-TMR Doc #: 30 Filed: 08/14/18 Page: 16 of 16 PAGEID #: 121
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 71 

Honoring the memory of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 

Stoneman Douglas High School 1 year ago. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the memory of the victims of the senseless attack 

at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School 1 year ago. 

Whereas, on February 14, 2018, a mass shooting that took 

the lives of 17 teachers and students took place at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida; 

Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for 

those who were affected by this tragedy; 

Whereas President Donald Trump stated: ‘‘No child, no 

teacher, should ever be in danger in an American school. 

No parent should ever have to fear for their sons and 

daughters when they kiss them goodbye in the morning.’’; 

Whereas the Parkland community has shown strength, compassion, and unity in the past year; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 71 ATS 

Whereas February 14, 2019, marks 1 year since the horrific 

attack: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commemorates the victims killed in the at3 tack and offers heartfelt condolences and deepest 

4 sympathies to the families, loved ones, and friends of 

5 the victims; 

6 (2) honors the survivors and pledges continued 

7 support for their recovery; 

8 (3) recognizes the strength and resilience of the 

9 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School community; 

10 and 

11 (4) expresses gratitude to the emergency med12 ical and health care professionals of the Parkland 

13 community for their efforts in responding to the at14 tack and caring for the victims and survivors. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Inhibiton Therapeutics, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Henry
      Fong, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and





(2)         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and
      for
      the periods presented in theReport.








/s/
                Henry FongHenry
                FongPrincipal
                Executive Officer and
              Principal
                Accounting OfficerSeptember
                14, 2007








A
      SIGNED
      ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED
      TO
      INHIBITON THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY INHIBITON THERAPEUTICS,
      INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
      REQUEST.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments

ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) intends to request 
approval, from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the 
collection of information described below. The Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA) requires federal agencies to publish a notice in the Federal 
Register concerning each proposed collection of information before 
submission to OMB, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response 
to the notice. This notice complies with that requirement.

DATES: Submit comments on or before March 29, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments to Mary Frias, Loan Specialist, Office of 
Financial Assistance, Small Business Administration, Washington, DC 
20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Frias, Loan Specialist, Office of 
Financial Assistance, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#325f53404b1c54405b5341724150531c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2dfd3c0cb9cd4c0dbd3c1f2c1d0d39cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-401-8234, or Curtis B. 
Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97f4e2e5e3fee4b9e5fef4ffd7e4f5f6b9f0f8e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bad9cfc8ced3c994c8d3d9d2fac9d8db94ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The servicing agent agreement is executed by 
the borrower, and the certified development company as the loan 
servicing agent. The agreement is primarily used by the certified 
development company as the loan servicing agent and acknowledges the 
imposition of various fees allowed in SBA's 504 loan program.

Solicitation of Public Comments

    SBA is requesting comments on (a) Whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the agency to properly perform its 
functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are accurate; (c) whether 
there are ways to minimize the burden, including through the use of 
automated techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) 
whether there are ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information.

Summary of Information Collection

    OMB Control Number: 3245-0193.
    Title: Servicing Agent Agreement.
    Description of Respondents: SBA Borrowers.
    Form Number: SBA Form 1506.
    Total Estimated Annual Responses: 6,151.
    Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 6,151.

Curtis Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2022-01745 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
 TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
 with the quarterly report of SpatiaLight, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
 the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
 on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert A. Olins, Chief Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
 that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Robert A. Olins        
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | Robert A. Olins            
| | Chief Executive Officer and
| | Principal Financial Officer
| | November 13, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

MASON A. CYRUS,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-226

VS.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #17), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing objections under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, said Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #17) is ADOPTED in full;

2. The Commissioner’s non-disability determination is REVERSED;

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and

4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

Date: _#/-22-19 (2-Mey
WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
f10kprwt031609draft.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing


 

	


Exhibit 10.10.2

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

PREMIERWEST BANK

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN AGREEMENT

 (SERP)

           This First Amendment dated December 18, 2008 (this “Amendment”), amends the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement (SERP) by and between PremierWest Bancorp (“Bancorp”), PremierWest Bank (“Bank”, and together with Bancorp, “Company”) and Richard Hieb (the “Executive”) dated December 13, 2007 (the “Agreement”).

1.           Section 3.2 of the Agreement is amended to revise the two references to “15 years” to “15 years,

              7 months.”



2.           Except as specifically set forth herein, the Agreement as previously executed shall continue in

              full force and effect as written. Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the

              meanings set forth in the Agreement.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

		
	PREMIERWEST BANCORP 	EXECUTIVE 
	 
	 
	By:__________________________________	______________________________
	             James Ford 	Richard Hieb 
	             President and Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 
	PREMIERWEST BANK 	 
	 
	 
	By:_________________________________ 	 
	             James Ford 	 
	             President and Chief Executive Officer 	 



- 1 -