alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,579
<SECURITIES>                                    36,787
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (689)
<INVENTORY>                                      9,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,534
<PP&E>                                          23,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,280)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,879
<SALES>                                         22,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,044
<CGS>                                            6,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,850
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,503
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM 39460

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Jacob A. RALSTON

Technical Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 12 September 2019

________________________

Military Judge: Andrew Kalavanos.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 18 months,

and reduction to E-4. Sentence adjudged 31 October 2017 by GCM convened at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia.

For Appellant: Major Mark J. Schwartz, USAF.

For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen 

Payne, Esquire.

Before MINK, LEWIS, and D. JOHNSON, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 
United States v. Ralston, No. ACM 39460

2

59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).1

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.2

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court

 

1 Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.).

2 Although Appellant raises no specific assignment of error, his appellate defense counsel noted that the record of trial did contain post-trial processing errors but that none 

prejudiced Appellant. One such error identified by this court was that the convening 

authority took action 178 days after the announcement of sentence, exceeding the 120-

day threshold for a presumptively unreasonable post-trial delay. See United States v. 

Moreno, 63 M.J. 129, 142 (C.A.A.F. 2006). However, as noted above, Appellant does not 

assert that he suffered any prejudice from the delay and we perceive none. Having 

considered the relevant factors identified in Moreno, 63 M.J. at 135, and finding no 

adverse impact on the public’s perception of the fairness or integrity of the military 

justice system, we find no violation of Appellant’s due process rights. See United States 

v. Toohey, 63 M.J. 353, 362 (C.A.A.F. 2006). Pursuant to our authority under Article 

66, UCMJ, we have also considered whether relief for post-trial delay in the absence 

of a due process violation is appropriate and find it is not. See United States v. Tardif, 

57 M.J. 219, 225 (C.A.A.F. 2002); United States v. Gay, 74 M.J. 736, 744 (A.F. Ct. Crim. 

App. 2015), aff’d, 75 M.J. 264 (C.A.A.F. 2016).
#### Moss v General Motors Corporation,

No. 91028;

Court of Appeals No. 132530.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Virtual Meeting. Note: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the meeting, see the instructions below.

# STATUS:

                        This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual meeting, go to the Commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2021-13: Matthew P. Hoh

Proposed Rule of Agency Procedure Concerning Foreign State Respondents

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Connecticut Democratic State Central Committee (A19-19)

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Republican Party of Minnesota—Federal (A19-09)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Democracy Engine, Inc., PAC (A19-18)

Management and Administrative Matters

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, telephone: (202) 694-1220.

*Authority:*                         Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Laura E. Sinram,

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-01435 Filed 1-20-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
UNITED STATES FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
AT DAYTON

IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL | CASE NO. 3:18-CV-114
OF SOUTHERN OHIO & VICINITY

BENEFIT TRUST, et ai., JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHARON L.
Plaintiffs, OVINGTON
vs.
ORDER

ALW CONSTRUCTION LLC., et al.,

Defendants.

This action came before the Court on Judgment Creditors Iron Workers District Council of
Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust, Iron Workers District Council of Southern Ohio &
Vicinity Pension Trust, and Iron Workers District Council of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Annuity
Trust (collectively “Judgment Creditors”) Motion to Stay proceedings. Based on Judgment
Creditors’ Motion to Stay, the Judgment Debtor’s Exam of ALW Construction LLC, only,
currently scheduled for January 10, 2019, will be continued or otherwise stayed during the

pendency of ALW Construction LLC’s bankruptcy matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Le, a au L

/MAGISTRATE SHARON L. onesynores
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Tamara Brown, et al., : Case No. 1:18-cv-00412

:

Plaintiffs, : Judge Susan J. Dlott

:

vs. :

: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

City of Cincinnati, Ohio, et al.,

 Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

Please take notice that Robert J. Thumann of Crehan & Thumann, LLC enters his 

appearance as co-counsel on behalf of the Plaintiffs.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Robert J. Thumann

Robert J. Thumann (0074975)

Crehan & Thumann, LLC

404 E 12th Street, Second Floor

Cincinnati OH 45202

Office 513-381-5050

Fax 513-381-1700

Co-counsel for Plaintiffs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed using the Court’s 

CM/ECF electronic filing system, which will send notification to all counsel of record registered 

with the Court’s filing system, on this the 19th day of June, 2018.

/s/ Robert J. Thumann

Robert J. Thumann (0074975)

Case: 1:18-cv-00412-MWM-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/19/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 120
Exhibit 10.9

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	
$[         ]
    	
[   ], 2015
    


 

Loan and Rate:

 

For value received, Gabelli Securities, Inc. (the “Borrower”) promises to pay to GAMCO Investors, Inc. (the “Lender”), a Delaware corporation, or to Lender’s order, on the earlier of (i) demand or (ii) the fifth anniversary of the date this Note, the principal amount of                                    U.S. Dollars ($                       ) less any principal amount repaid prior to such date, and to pay interest thereon from the date first written above at the annual rate of four percent (4.0%).

 

Payment:

 

The principal amount under this Note, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, shall be due and payable within five business days after the Lender gives written notice to the Borrower demanding repayment. The Borrower may at any time repay all or any portion of the principal amount of this Note together with all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount of principal that is repaid.

 

Interest shall be paid no later than annually on or before each anniversary of the date of this Note, or at such other time or times as agreed to by the Lender and the Borrower.

 

Default:

 

In the event that any payment of interest or principal is not received by the Lender within fifteen (15) days of the due date, then the entire principal balance together with all accrued and unpaid interest plus any other amounts then owing pursuant to this Note shall, without curing the default hereunder and to the extent permitted by law, thereafter bear interest at the annual rate of fifteen percent (15%). If any default occurs in any payment due under this Note, Borrower promises to pay all reasonable costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and expenses, incurred by the Lender in collecting or attempting to collect the indebtedness under this Note.

 

Assignment

 

Neither Lender nor Borrower may assign its rights hereunder without the consent of the other party, except that Lender may assign its rights hereunder to Associated Capital Group, Inc. without the consent of Borrower.

 

Governing Law:

 

This Note shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to conflict of law principles.

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Note to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
BORROWER:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
GABELLI SECURITIES, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Douglas   R. Jamieson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Its:
    	
President
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
ACCEPTED   AND AGREED:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
LENDER:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
GAMCO   INVESTORS, INC.
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Its:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01355]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  Wednesday, January 26, 2022, 10:00-11:00 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be held remotely.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters To Be Considered: Decisional Matter:

Final Rule: Safety Standard for Crib Mattresses

    All attendees and participants should pre-register for the 
Commission meeting (Webinar). To pre-register for the Webinar, please 
visit https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/9089674042451601677 and 
fill in the information. After registering you will receive a 
confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 
(Cell).

    Dated: January 19, 2022.
Alberta E. Mills,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01355 Filed 1-20-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                           (as of February 28, 1999)


           Name                            State or Country of Organization

LaRoche International Inc.                            Delaware

LaRoche Overseas Inc.                                 Delaware

LaRoche Europe Holdings, Inc.                         Delaware

LCI Stone Inc.                                        Delaware

LII Europe S.A.R.L.                                   France

  ChlorAlp S.A.S. (50% owned)                         France

  LII Management S.A.R.L.                             France

    LII Europe GmbH                                   Germany



The names of certain subsidiaries and equity entities which, considered in the
aggregate, would not constitute a significant subsidiary, have been omitted
from the above list.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7989** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TIMOTHY WAYNE EDDINGTON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 0:07

- cr - 01149

- CMC

- 1; 0:11

- cv - 02859

- CMC )

Submitted : April 25, 2013 Decided: May 2, 2013

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Timothy Wayne Eddington, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Claude Jendron, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Timothy Wayne Eddington seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standar d by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the d istrict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.
W e have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Eddington has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, although we grant Eddington’s motion to amend his informal brief, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability , deny his motion for permission to file a successive § 2255 motion, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument3 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process
.

DISMISSED
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 8 

To make effective appointment of Deputy Senate Legal Counsel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To make effective appointment of Deputy Senate Legal 

Counsel. 

1 Resolved, That the appointment of Morgan J. Frankel 

2 of the District of Columbia to be Deputy Senate Legal 

3 Counsel, made by the President pro tempore this day, is 

4 effective as of January 3, 2019, and the term of service 

5 of the appointee shall expire at the end of the One Hun6 dred Seventeenth Congress. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10263
<ALLOWANCES>                                       514
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10834
<PP&E>                                            9139
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   16352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7877
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                        8437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     16352
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 76504
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    61871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 12581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   126
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1376
<INCOME-TAX>                                       531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                845
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       845
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23



</TABLE>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

WILLIAM WICK, * No. 14-116V

* Special Master Christian J. Moran

Petitioner, *

v. * Filed: February 9, 2015

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * hearing loss.

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Lawrence Disparti, Disparti Law Group, PA, Holiday, FL, for Petitioner;

Lara Englund, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On February 6, 2015, respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning the 

petition for compensation filed by William Wick on February 7, 2014. In his

petition, Mr. Wick alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which is contained in 

the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which he 

received on or about December 11, 2012, caused him to develop hearing loss. 

Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of this injury for 

more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or 

settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his condition.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s hearing 

loss or any other injury or his current condition.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as 

“Appendix A.” The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as 

1 The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the party has 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website.

 
the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum of $7,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, 

William Wick. This amount represents compensation for all damages 

that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, 

the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 14-116V according to this decision 

and the attached stipulation.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357-

6353.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.

2

 
Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-00116-UNJ Document 22 Filed 02/06/15 Page 5 of 5
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAMIAN KING

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2411

[ October 24, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Daniel A. Casey , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 99

- 0 3889 CF10A

.

Damian King, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., G ROSS and M AY

, JJ ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 nos. 33-15777, 33-33966, 66-61286, 33-90490, 333-01885, 333-07519, 333-69597, 333-69599, 333-92879, 333-51892, 333-51894, 333-106601, 333-108736, 333-119740, 333-123349, and 333-139279) pertaining to various stock plans of Manatron, Inc. and subsidiary of our reports dated June 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Manatron, Inc. and subsidiary included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2007.

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
July 18, 2007
Case: 1:18-cr-00109-TSB Doc #: 77 Filed: 12/20/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 503
Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 185 Filed: 07/13/21 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: 1361

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 185 Filed: 07/13/21 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: 1362

Case: 2:18-cv-00692-MHW-EPD Doc #: 185 Filed: 07/13/21 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: 1363