Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2022 / Notices 2761 

1See Glycine from India: Preliminary Results of 

the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 

2018–2019, 86 FR 37738 (July 16, 2021) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

October 21, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review of Glycine from India, 

2018–2019: Post-Preliminary Decision,’’ dated 

November 16, 2021 (Post-Preliminary Decision). 

4See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

GEO Specialty Chemical’s Case Brief,’’ dated 

November 29, 2021; Avid’s Letter, ‘‘Glycine from 

India: Case Brief—Avid Organic’s Pvt. Ltd.,’’ dated 

November 29, 2021; and Kumar’s Letter, ‘‘Certain 

Glycine from India (C–533–884) Kumar Industries— 

Case Brief,’’ dated November 30, 2021. 

5See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

GEO Specialty Chemicals’ Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated 

December 6, 2021; Avid’s Letter, ‘‘Glycine from 

India: Rebuttal Brief—Avid Organics Pvt. Ltd.,’’ 

dated December 6, 2021; Kumar’s Letter, ‘‘Certain 

Glycine from India (C–533–884) Kumar Industries— 

Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated December 6, 2021; and Paras’ 

Letter, ‘‘Paras Intermediates Private Limited 

(‘‘Paras’’) Administrative Rebuttal Brief: 

Countervailing Duty Investigation on Glycine from 

India,’’ dated December 6, 2021. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: Issues 

and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results of review within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 12, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Period of Review 

VI. Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

VII. Subsidies Valuation Information 

VIII. Analysis of Programs 

IX. Discussion of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether Electricity Is 

Subsidized by the Government of the 

Republic of Korea (GOK) 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce’s 

Determination that Port Usage Rights 

Provide a Countervailable Benefit Is 

Unsupported by Evidence and Contrary 

to Law 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce 

Incorrectly Countervailed the Reduction 

for Sewerage Usage Fees 

Comment 4: Whether the Restructuring of 

KG Dongbu Steel’s Existing Loans by 

GOK-Controlled Financial Institutions 

Constitutes a Financial Contribution and 

a Benefit to KG Dongbu Steel 

Comment 5: Whether the Restructured 

Loans Provided to KG Dongbu Were 

Specific 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Use the Interest Rates From Loans 

Provided by Private Banks Participating 

in the Creditor Bank Committee as 

Benchmarks 

Comment 7: Whether KG Dongbu Steel Is 

Equityworthy and the 2015–2018 Debtto-Equity Swaps Should Be 

Countervailed 

Comment 8: Whether Subsidies Prior to 

Dongbu Steel’s Change in Ownership 

Pass Through to KG Dongbu Steel 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce 

Incorrectly Calculated the 

Uncreditworthy Discount Rate Used for 

Allocating the Benefits From Long-Term 

Loans, Bonds, and Equity Infusions 

Comment 10: Whether Commerce 

Incorrectly Calculated the Discount Rate 

for the 2019 Government Equity Infusion 

XI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Non-Selected Companies 

1. Ajin H & S Co., Ltd. 

2. AJU Steel Co., Ltd. 

3. B&N International 

4. CDS Global Logistics 

5. Dong A Hwa Sung Co., Ltd. 

6. Dongkuk International, Inc. 

7. Korea Clad Tech. Co., Ltd. 

8. Pantos Logistics Co., Ltd. 

9. PL Special Steel Co., Ltd. 

10. POSCO 

11. POSCO C&C 

12. POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd. 

13. POSCO Daewoo Corp. 

14. Samsung C&T Corporation 

15. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 

16. Sanglim Steel Co., Ltd. 

17. SeAH Coated Metal 

18. SeAH Steel Corporation 

19. Seajin St. Industry, Ltd. 

20. Sejung Shipping Co., Ltd. 

21. Seun Steel Co., Ltd. 

22. Segye Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. 

23. Shandongsheng Cao Xian Yalu Mftd. 

24. Shengzhou Hanshine Import and Export 

Trade 

25. Soon Hong Trading Co., Ltd. 

26. Southern Steel Sheet Co., Ltd. 

27. SSangyong Manufacturing 

28. Sung A Steel Co., Ltd. 

29. SW Co., Ltd. 

30. SY Co., Ltd. 

31. Syon 

32. TCC Steel. Co., Ltd. 

33. Young Steel Korea Co., Ltd. 

34. Young Sun Steel Co. 

35. Young Steel Co. 

[FR Doc. 2022–00939 Filed 1–18–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–884] 

Glycine From India: Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

glycine from India during the period of 

review (POR), September 4, 2018, 

through December 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable January 19, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Davina Friedmann, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0698. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 16, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review in the 

Federal Register.1 On October 21, 2021, 

Commerce extended the final results of 

review by 60 days, until January 12, 

2022.2 On November 16, 2021, 

Commerce issued a post-preliminary 

decision.3 We invited parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results 

and on the Post-Preliminary Decision. 

On November 29 and 30, 2021, case 

briefs were timely filed by GEO 

Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (the 

petitioner), Avid Organics Private 

Limited (Avid), and Kumar Industries, 

India (Kumar).4 On December 6, 2021, 

timely rebuttal briefs were submitted to 

Commerce by the petitioner, Avid, 

Kumar and Paras Intermediates Private 

Limited (Paras).5 For a full description 

of the events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.6

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is glycine from India. For the complete 

description of the scope of the order, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in interested parties’ 

briefs are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues raised by interested parties, and 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
2762 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2022 / Notices 

7See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Final Results Calculation of 

Subsidy Rate for Non-Examined Companies Under 

Review,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

9See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 days in Applicable 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

to which Commerce responded in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, is 

provided in the appendix to this notice. 

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review and analysis of 

the comments received from parties, we 

made certain changes to the net subsidy 

rates calculated for Avid and Kumar, 

and for companies not selected for 

individual review. These changes are 

explained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 

find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a 

government-provided financial 

contribution that gives rise to a benefit 

to the recipient, and the subsidy is 

specific.7 For a full description of the 

methodology underlying all of 

Commerce’s conclusions, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

For the companies not selected for 

individual examination, because the 

rates calculated for Avid and Kumar are 

above de minimis and not based entirely 

on facts available, we applied a subsidy 

rate based on a weighted-average of the 

subsidy rates calculated for Avid and 

Kumar using publicly ranged sales data 

submitted by the respondents.8 This is 

consistent with the methodology that 

we would use in an investigation to 

establish the all-others rate, pursuant to 

section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

We determine the following net 

countervailable subsidy rates for the 

period September 4, 2018, through 

December 31, 2019: 

Company 2018 Subsidy rate 

(percent ad valorem) 

2019 Subsidy Rate 

(percent ad valorem) 

Avid Organics Private Limited ................................................................................................. 5.01 5.16 

Kumar Industries (India) .......................................................................................................... 11.81 3.75 

Mulji Mehta Enterprises ........................................................................................................... 3.92 4.35 

Mulji Mehta Pharma ................................................................................................................. 3.92 4.35 

Paras Intermediates Private Limited ....................................................................................... 3.92 4.35 

Rudraa International ................................................................................................................ 3.92 4.35 

Studio Disrupt .......................................................................................................................... 3.92 4.35 

Disclosure 

Commerce will disclose to the parties 

in this proceeding the calculations 

performed for these final results of 

review within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review, for the 

above-listed companies at the applicable 

ad valorem assessment rates listed. 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register.9 If a timely summons 

is filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown for each of the 

companies listed above on shipments of 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, Commerce will instruct 

CBP to continue to collect cash deposits 

of estimated countervailing duties at the 

most recent company-specific or allothers rate applicable to the company, 

as appropriate. These cash deposit 

requirements, effective upon 

publication of these final results, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return or destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: January 12, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Rate for Non-Examined Companies Under 

Review 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2022 / Notices 2763 

1See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of 

Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 38015 (July 19, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain 

Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea; 2019–2020,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

3See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of 

Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 

2015) (Order). 

V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

VI. Subsidies Valuation 

VII. Analysis of Programs 

VIII. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Calculation of a Single Rate 

for the Period of Review Covering 2018 

and 2019 

Comment 2: Application of Adverse Facts 

Available (AFA) to Kumar 

Comment 3: Pre- and Post-Shipment 

Finance Program: Interest Rate 

Benchmark for Kumar 

Comment 4: Interest Equalization Scheme 

on Pre- and Post-Shipment RupeeDenominated Export Credit Program: 

Sales Denominator for Kumar 

Comment 5: Duty Drawback Program: 

Benefit Calculation for Avid 

Comment 6: Interest Subsidy Under 

Scheme for Assistance of Micro, Small, 

and Medium-sized Enterprises (MSMEs) 

as per Gujarat Industrial Policy 2009: 

Benefit Calculation for Avid 

Comment 7: Export Promotion Capital 

Goods Scheme: Benefit Calculation for 

Avid 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–00954 Filed 1–18–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–874] 

Certain Steel Nails From the Republic 

of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that producers 

and/or exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable January 19, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eva 

Kim, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8283. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 19, 2021, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of the 

2019–2020 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

steel nails from the Republic of Korea 

(Korea).1 We invited interested parties 

to comment on the Preliminary Results. 

A full description of the events since the 

Preliminary Results is contained in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.2

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 3

The products covered by the AD 

Order are steel nails from Korea. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in the appendix 

to this notice and addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we have made no 

changes to the margin calculation for 

the sole mandatory respondent, Daejin 

Steel Company (Daejin), since the 

Preliminary Results. 

Rate for Non-Examined Company 

Generally, when calculating margins 

for non-selected respondents, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act for guidance, which provides 

instructions for calculating the allothers margin in an investigation. 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides 

that when calculating the all-others 

margin, Commerce will exclude any 

zero and de minimis weighted average 

dumping margins, as well as any 

weighted-average dumping margins 

based on total facts available. 

Accordingly, Commerce’s usual practice 

has been to average the margins for 

selected respondents, excluding margins 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available. In this 

review, we calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin of 3.22 percent 

for Daejin, the sole mandatory 

respondent. In accordance with section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce 

assigned Daejin’s calculated weightedaverage dumping margin, i.e., 3.22 

percent, to the non-selected company in 

these final results. Accordingly, we have 

applied a rate of 3.22 percent to the nonselected company, i.e., Koram Inc. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Daejin Steel Company ................ 3.22 

Koram Inc ................................... 3.22 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. We intend to 

calculate importer- (or customer-) 

specific assessment rates on the basis of 

the ratio of the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for each 

importer (or customer’s) examined sales 

and the total entered value of the sales 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). Where an importer- (or 

customer-) specific rate is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Commerce’s ‘‘reseller policy’’ will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by companies 

included in these final results of review 

for which the reviewed companies did 

not know that the merchandise they 

sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, 

trading company, or exporter) was 

destined for the United States. In such 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1