alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                           --------------------------

                  P.A.M. Transport, Inc. (Arkansas Corporation)

              P.A.M. Special Services, Inc. (Arkansas Corporation)

               P.A.M. Dedicated Services, Inc. (Ohio Corporation)

             P.A.M. Logistics Services, Inc. (Arkansas Corporation)

                        T.T.X., Inc. (Texas Corporation)

                  Choctaw Express, Inc. (Oklahoma Corporation)

                 Choctaw Brokerage, Inc. (Oklahoma Corporation)

               Allen Freight Services, Inc. (Missouri Corporation)

                  Decker Transport Co., Inc. (Ohio Corporation)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 707 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 707

 Recognizing September 1, 2020, as ``National Poll Worker Recruitment 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2020

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Alexander, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
Bennet, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. Brown, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Casey, 
 Mr. Coons, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Cruz, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Heinrich, 
Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Markey, Mr. McConnell, Mr. 
Merkley, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Peters, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Smith, 
   Mr. Warner, Ms. Warren, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Wyden) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing September 1, 2020, as ``National Poll Worker Recruitment 
                                 Day''.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes September 1, 2020, as ``National Poll Worker 
        Recruitment Day'';
            (2) recognizes the need for, and appreciation of, the 
        service of poll workers; and
            (3) encourages eligible people to help America vote in the 
        2020 election by serving as poll workers.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the Report), the undersigned
Michael E. Havener, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  the Company.
|
|

| | /s/
    Michael E. Havener    
| | ------------------------------
| | Michael E. Havener            
| | Chief Financial Officer       
| | Premiere Global Services, Inc.
| | August 9, 2006                

---
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4621 

AN ACT 

To protect the integrity of the constitutionally mandated 

United States census and prohibit deceptive mail practices that attempt to exploit the decennial census. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4621 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Deceptive Cen3 sus Look Alike Mailings Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR MAIL BEARING THE TERM 

5 ‘‘CENSUS’’ ON THE ENVELOPE OR OUTSIDE 

6 COVER OR WRAPPER. 

7 (a) MATTER SOLICITING PURCHASE OF A PRODUCT

8 OR SERVICE.—Section 3001(h) of title 39, United States 

9 Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by inserting, in the matter preceding para11 graph (1), ‘‘; or which bears the term ‘census’ on the 

12 envelope or outside cover or wrapper’’ after ‘‘such 

13 matter by the Federal Government’’; 

14 (2) in paragraph (2), by redesignating subpara15 graphs (A), (B), and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and 

16 (iii), respectively; 

17 (3) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and 

18 (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively; 

19 (4) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(h)’’; and 

20 (5) by adding at the end the following new 

21 paragraph: 

22 ‘‘(2) In the case of matter bearing the term ‘census’ 

23 on the envelope or outside cover or wrapper, in addition 

24 to satisfying one of the exceptions contained in paragraphs 

25 (1)(A), (1)(B), or (1)(C), such envelope or outside cover 
3 

•HR 4621 EH

1 or wrapper bears on its face an accurate return address 

2 including the name of the entity that sent such matter.’’. 

3 (b) MATTER SOLICITING INFORMATION OR CON4 TRIBUTION OF FUNDS.—Section 3001(i) of title 39, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting, in the matter preceding para7 graph (1), ‘‘; or which bears the term ‘census’ on the 

8 envelope or outside cover or wrapper’’ after ‘‘such 

9 matter by the Federal Government’’; 

10 (2) in paragraph (2), by redesignating subpara11 graphs (A), (B), and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and 

12 (iii), respectively; 

13 (3) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and 

14 (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively; 

15 (4) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(i)’’; and 

16 (5) by adding at the end the following new 

17 paragraph: 

18 ‘‘(2) In the case of matter bearing the term ‘census’ 

19 on the envelope or outside cover or wrapper, in addition 

20 to satisfying one of the exceptions contained in paragraphs 

21 (1)(A), (1)(B), or (1)(C), such envelope or outside cover 
4 

•HR 4621 EH

1 or wrapper bears on its face an accurate return address 

2 including the name of the entity that sent such matter.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4621 

AN ACT 

To protect the integrity of the constitutionally mancennial census. tive mail practices that attempt to exploit the de- dated United States census and prohibit decep-
Case 1:01-cv-00096-TSH     Document 139      Filed 09/30/2003     Page 1 of 5

Case 1:01-cv-00096-TSH     Document 139      Filed 09/30/2003     Page 2 of 5

Case 1:01-cv-00096-TSH     Document 139      Filed 09/30/2003     Page 3 of 5

Case 1:01-cv-00096-TSH     Document 139      Filed 09/30/2003     Page 4 of 5

Case 1:01-cv-00096-TSH     Document 139      Filed 09/30/2003     Page 5 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 3:18-CR-025

Plaintiff,

vs. District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
SIXTO ZAZUETA, JR.,

Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 40)

This case is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 40), wherein the Magistrate Judge recommends that
Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment be accepted by the Court and that
Defendant be found guilty as charged in such Count. The parties filed no objections to the Report
and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and the time for filing objections has expired.

The Court, having reviewed the matter de novo, determines that the Report and
Recommendation (doc. 40) of the United States Magistrate Judge should be and is hereby
ADOPTED in its entirety. The Court ACCEPTS Defendant’s guilty plea and Defendant is

hereby adjudged GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LMs he

Walter H. Rice

Date: __ 1 O>1¥-1@
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISI'RICI'OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STA I'ES OF AMERICA U.S. Atty: ~&UXA MZAIDUSZNG, €5~ 

v. Case Number: 1:OO-CR-00093 

TODD R1.AKE OLIVER Dcfi Atty: &f CHARD SMTT,-~-I%A/AXU$ ESQ . 

CKlMlNAL MINUTES: SUPERVISED KELEASWPROBA'HON REVOCA'HON HEARING 

Defendant appeared with counsel. 

Dcfcndant X ADMITS to violations of conditions of supervision; or 

was found in violation of conditions ofsupcrvision by the Court after denial of guilt 

Supervised ReleasdProbalion REVOKED by the Court. Defendant sentenced as follows: 

X JAIL: 2 'f MONTHS, ro BE SE#,,,CD 

Conditions: CONSEC VZUE TO ANY S ENrEfdCE ;LMPOSED BY CAT€ COUAT 

Recommendations: 

Closest appropriate facility lo 

SUPERVISED RELEASEIPKORATION: MON-EISNEARS 

Conditions: 

Defendant shall not commit another fcdcral. srate or local crime 

Defendant shall not illegally possess a controlled substance 

- Defendant shall rcfrain liotn any unlawful use of a controlled substance, and shall submit 

lo one drug test within 15 days of placement on Supervised ReleaseiProbation and at lcast 

two puriodic drug tests thereatier, as directed by the Probation Officer 

Defendant shall not possess a Grearm, ammunition. or any other dangerous weapon 

Defendant shall coopcrate ill the collect~on of DNA, as directed by the Probation Officer 

1)efmdant shall amply with the standard conditions that have been adopted by this Court 

- As a condition. the delrndanl shall pay any unpaid lnonetary penalties 

- Dcfcndant is prohibited from opening any new lines ofcredit or from making purchases on any 

uxisting lines ofcredit until tine andlor restitution 1s paid in hll. 

Dekndant shall d~sclose tinancial infomiation as rcqucsted by the I'robation Otlicer 

Defendant shall undergo a whstance ahuse aridfor mental health assessment and comply with 

with any recommendrd trealnlent 

Other: 

Custodial Status: $( Rcrnandcd to C:ustody Voluntary Surrcndcr to designated facility no later than: 

at 1L:OO Noon 

~udgc: S. ~rtl~ur Spiegel ~ourtroorn ~cputy: K&L/~N MPsER 

Date: . /:Lr/9' Court Reporter: -TOorg ~E&YEN~.(OFFC~

I'in~e start: I 0 :SAM '~'inie stop: Id.'/< 

Case 1:00-cr-00093-SAS Document 59 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-28-1997

<CASH>                                         11,987
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  175,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,891
<PP&E>                                         410,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 730,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,867
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     361,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   730,685
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               736,580
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  690,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (435)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                41,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                   17,532
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            24,291
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   24,291
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.96
        



</TABLE>
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA-125D Directorate Identifier: 200BNM169AD
ISB. 57-070 --- 10/15/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained inthe Supplemental AD Docket
MAY BEVIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. Sw., Renton, WA 98057 

### 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9a.m. and 3pm., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03105/2008
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21 - 1856 In re: SUSAN NEAL MATOUSEK , Petitioner . On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 2:18 - cv - 00448 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00501 - RAJ LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00457 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00500 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00433 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00445 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00446 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00597 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv 00595 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00596 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00620 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00609 - RAJ - LRL; 2:18 - cv - 00293 - RAJ - LRL; 2:1 8 - cv - 00301 - RAJ - LRL ) Submitted : August 18, 2021 Decided: August 24, 2021 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges. Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion . Susan Neal Matousek , Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Susan Neal Matousek has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing that her prior mandamus petition in case No. 21 - 1413 , In re Matousek , qualify as a landmark case to ensure a police reform bill is enacted, that whistleblowers like her not be hurt, that she be given time to discuss her cases with a panel of judges, and that she be given an opportunity to have oral argument. We conclude that Matousek i s not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy - Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mand amus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to attain the relief [she] desires.” Murphy - Brown , 907 F.3d at 795 (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal, In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007), and this court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, Gurley v. Superior Ct. of Mecklenburg Cnty. , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969) (per curiam). The relief sought by Matousek is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
Case: 1:18-cr-00074-MWM Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/09/20 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 335
Case: 1:18-cr-00074-MWM Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/09/20 Page: 2 of 4 PAGEID #: 336
Case: 1:18-cr-00074-MWM Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/09/20 Page: 3 of 4 PAGEID #: 337
Case: 1:18-cr-00074-MWM Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/09/20 Page: 4 of 4 PAGEID #: 338
EXHIBIT 11

                        PIONEER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

                      STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE

                                   NET INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    For the Year Ended December 31
                                  1995           1994              1993   

<S>                       <C>              <C>               <C>          
Net Income                $ 20,968,000     $ 17,149,000      $ 12,145,000 
Less Dividends on
 Preferred Stock            (1,805,000)      (1,904,000)       (2,021,000)

Primary Basis-Net Income  $ 19,163,000     $ 15,245,000      $ 10,124,000 

 Fully Diluted Basis-
 Net Income **            $ 23,266,000     $ 20,145,000      $ 13,507,000 

Average shares outstanding   7,586,908        6,221,216         6,546,719 
Common Stock equivalents
 from dilutive stock
 options, based on the
 treasury stock method
 using average market 
 price                         252,501         237,847            176,883 

   TOTAL-PRIMARY BASIS       7,839,409        6,459,063         6,723,602 

Additional shares assuming
 conversion of Preferred 
 Stock                       1,358,240        1,387,680         1,515,200 
Additional shares assuming
 conversion of Subordinated
 Debentures                  3,231,282        4,887,404         2,282,774 
Additional Common Stock
 equivalents from dilutive
 stock options, based on the
 treasury stock method     
 using closing market price   179,483                -           209,618 

   TOTAL-FULLY DILUTED      12,608,414       12,734,147        10,731,194 

Net income per share-
 Primary                       $  2.44          $ 2.36            $ 1.51  

Net income per share-
 Fully Diluted                 $  1.85          $ 1.58            $ 1.26  





**  Fully diluted net income per share was calculated after adding tax effected
interest and amortization of offering costs on Subordinated Debentures of
$2,298,000, $2,996,000, and $1,362,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995,
1994, and 1993, respectively.

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ARNOLD ANDERSON, : 

 : Case No. 2:17-CV-1057 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 v. : 

 : Magistrate Judge Deavers 

JEFF LAWLESS, et al., : 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

ORDER 

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s December 21, 2017 

Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6), which recommended that Plaintiff’s First 

Amendment retaliation and Eighth Amendment use of force claims continue against Defendants 

Spoljarik, Hatfield, and Akers in their individual capacities, and that the Court dismiss all of 

Plaintiff’s other claims for failure to assert any claim on which relief may be granted. 

The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that the failure to object 

results in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation 

de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court 

adopting the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 6 at 16). The parties have failed to file 

any objections, and the deadline for objections (January 4, 2018) has lapsed. 

 The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on the independent 

consideration of the analysis therein. Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation and Eighth 

Amendment use of force claims against Defendants Spoljarik, Hatfield, and Akers in their 

individual capacity are allowed to continue, and the remaining claims are hereby DISMISSED. 
2 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATED: February 21, 2018
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Tex as

May 5, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00178

- CV

WEBB CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

, Appellant

v.

Robert MARSHALL and Amy Marshall,

Appellees

From the County Court At Law No 1

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CVK001053C1

Honorable Hugo Martinez , J udge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

appellant's brief is due on or before May 12, 2022.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixe d the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of May, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,
-vs- Case No. 3:18-CR-73-07

JAMES E. LEESON,

Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 77) , ACCEPTING THE PLEA OF GUILTY, AND
REFERRING THE CASE TO THE U.S. PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A
PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT

On March 20, 2019, this matter came before United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L.
Ovington for a Change of Plea Hearing. Having conducted a full plea colloquy with the Defendant,
the Magistrate Judge concluded that the Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 4 of the Indictment was
knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that there is an adequate factual basis for a finding of guilt.
This Court, noting that no objections have been filed thereto, and that the time for filing such
objections expired on April 17, 2019, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Therefore, based upon the aforesaid, and this Court’s de novo review of the comprehensive
findings by the United States Magistrate Judge this Court adopts the Report and Recommendations
of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc.77) in its entirety, finding that the plea was knowing,
intelligent and voluntary. The Defendant is FOUND guilty of the offense for which he pled. This
matter is ORDERED referred to the Unites States Probation Department for a presentence

investigation and report. Sentencing scheduled for July 24, 2019 at 1:30 p.m..

THOMAS M. ROSE, JUDGE
ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
October 13, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Meeting with National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners 

(NARUC) 

Attendees: 

Ellen Kurlansky, EPA/OAR/OAA/OPAR 

Joel Beauvais, EPA/OGC/IO 

Kellie Ortega, EPA/OECA/OCE/AED 

Phil Brooks, EPA/OECA/OCE/AED 

Joseph Goffman, EPA/OAR/OAA/OPMO 

Chuck Gray, NARUC 

Robin Lunt, NARUC 

Jon McKinney, commissioner from West Virginia 

On phone: 

John Betkoski, Connecticut 

Tracy Babbidge, Connecticut 

Colette Honorable, Arkansas 

Erin O'Connell-Diaz, Illinois 

Rob Powelson, Pennsylvania 

Matt Baker, Colorado 

Cheryl Roberto, Steve Lesser, Andre Porter, Ohio Commissioners 

Hisham Choueiki, Klaus Lambeck, Kim Wissman, Ohio staff 

Jim Gardner, Kentucky 

Stan Wise, Georgia 

Jean Fox, New Jersey 

Kim Jones, North Carolina staff 

Ed McNamara, Vermont staff 

James Austen, New York staff 

Discussion: 

A general discussion was held of the proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) and 

the potential role of PUCs in verifying reliability problems and in solving them (see attached).