3328 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2022 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[LLESJ02400–L16100000–DU0000– 

223L1109AF] 

Notice of Intent To Amend the 1995 

Florida Resource Management Plan 

and To Prepare an Associated 

Environmental Assessment 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969 as amended (NEPA) and the 

Federal Land Policy and Management 

Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 

Southeastern States District Office, 

Flowood, Mississippi, intends to 

prepare a Resource Management Plan 

(RMP) Amendment to the 1995 Florida 

Approved RMP, with an associated 

Environmental Assessment (EA), to 

evaluate proposed future management 

guidance for the Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse 

Outstanding Natural Area (ONA). This 

notice announces the beginning of the 

scoping process to solicit public 

comments and identify potential issues 

for consideration in the EA. This notice 

also announces the beginning of the 30- 

day review of the proposed planning 

criteria the BLM would use in the 

analysis of the RMP Amendment, and 

calls for nominations for new proposals 

or modifications to the existing area of 

critical environmental concern (ACEC) 

within the Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse 

ONA. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted in 

writing by February 22, 2022. The BLM 

will announce date(s), time(s), and 

detail(s) of any scoping meetings at least 

15 days in advance through local news 

media, newspapers, social media 

channels, and the BLM website at: 

www.blm.gov/JupiterONA. The BLM 

must receive all comments prior to the 

close of the 30-day scoping period in 

order to include them in the analysis. 

We will provide additional 

opportunities for public participation as 

appropriate. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

on issues and planning criteria related 

to the Florida RMP Amendment EA by 

any of the following methods: 

• Florida RMP Amendment ePlanning 

website: https://eplanning.blm.gov/ 

eplanning-ui/project/2002316/510; 

• Mail: Program Manager, Jupiter 

Inlet Lighthouse ONA, Bureau of Land 

Management, 600 State Road 707, Unit 

B, Jupiter, Florida 33469; or 

• Email: BLM_ES_JupiterONA@

blm.gov. 

Documents pertinent to this proposal 

may be examined online on the BLM 

ePlanning website provided above. The 

ePlanning site can also be accessed via 

links provided on the ONA official 

website here: www.blm.gov/JupiterONA. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter DeWitt, Program Manager; 

telephone: (561) 295–5955; email: BLM_

ES_JupiterONA@blm.gov. Persons who 

use a telecommunications device for the 

deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to 

contact Mr. DeWitt during normal 

business hours. The FRS is available 24 

hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 

message. You will receive a reply during 

normal business hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ONA 

was designated by Congress in 2008. It 

is a protected land area designation 

within the National Landscape 

Conservation System. This document 

provides notice that the BLM 

Southeastern States District intends to 

prepare an EA and RMP Amendment to 

the 1995 Florida RMP, exclusive to the 

ONA. The planning area is in Palm 

Beach County, Florida, and 

encompasses approximately 126 acres of 

both Federal and non-Federal surface 

lands that make up the ONA. The BLM, 

as directed by the Consolidated Natural 

Resources Act of 2008 (CNRA), manages 

the ONA in coordination with local 

partners to protect, preserve, and 

enhance the unique and nationally 

important historical, natural, cultural, 

scientific, educational, scenic, and 

recreational values at the ONA, with an 

emphasis on restoring native ecological 

systems. The proposed amendment will 

identify land management decisions for 

lands acquired within the planning area 

that currently have no land-use 

planning level decisions, evaluate landuse planning level decisions for 

recreation management, consider the 

availability of all or portions of the 

planning area for certain land-use 

authorizations, and evaluate the Jupiter 

Inlet tract ACEC decisions to address 

the need for the designation within the 

ONA. 

The 54-acre ACEC was designated by 

the 1995 Florida RMP as relevant and 

important for wildlife and cultural 

resources. An ACEC Evaluation Report 

published in Volume 3 of the draft 

Southeastern States RMP/EIS on 

October 24, 2016, determined that the 

ACEC and an 83-acre expanded 

nomination area continue to meet the 

relevance and importance criteria. No 

further areas or configurations for 

ACECs applicable to the planning area 

have been identified from previous 

planning efforts or from pre-planning 

activities on the current land-use plan 

amendment effort. Both the existing 

ACEC and the expanded nomination 

area are wholly within the ONA 

boundaries.U.S.C 

BLM identified preliminary issues for 

planning, which include: (1) Absence of 

land-use planning level guidance for the 

recreation and visitor services program; 

(2) necessity of, or lack thereof, special 

management for the existing ACEC or 

the expanded nomination area; and (3) 

availability of all or a portion of the 

ONA for issuing certain land-use 

authorizations. Public scoping is 

intended to determine relevant issues 

that will influence the scope of the EA, 

formulate alternatives, and guide the 

planning process. 

Preliminary planning criteria include: 

(1) Comply with FLPMA, CNRA, and all 

other laws, regulations, and policies; (2) 

recognize valid existing rights and allow 

for appropriate partner uses consistent 

with applicable laws; (3) establish new 

land-use planning level guidance and 

identify existing guidance for managing 

the ONA; (4) strive to protect, conserve, 

and enhance the unique and nationally 

important values at the ONA with an 

emphasis on conservation; (5) provide 

the framework for accommodating 

visitors for a range of educational, 

interpretive, and passive recreational 

experiences while ensuring that the 

ONA is preserved; (6) remain fiscally 

responsible with reasonable and 

achievable management decisions; and 

(7) provide for safe facilities, 

infrastructure, and grounds that are 

compatible with achieving the resource 

objectives for the ONA. 

You may submit comments on issues, 

planning criteria, the ACEC and its 

expanded nomination area, or new 

ACEC nominations in writing to the 

BLM at any public scoping meeting, or 

you may submit them to the BLM using 

one of the methods listed in the 

ADDRESSES section earlier. Comments 

must be submitted by the date identified 

in the DATES section earlier for 

consideration during the NEPA and 

land-use planning process. In 

accordance with FLPMA, the BLM will 

use and coordinate the NEPA scoping 

process to fulfill the public involvement 

process and compliance under Section 

106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act (NHPA) (16 U.S.C. 

470(f)), pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3). 

Information about historic and cultural 

resources within the area potentially 

affected by the proposed action will 

assist the BLM in identifying and 

evaluating impacts to such resources in 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2022 / Notices 3329 

the context of both NEPA and Section 

106 of the NHPA. 

The BLM will consult with Native 

American Tribes on a government-togovernment basis in accordance with 

Executive Order 13175 and other 

policies. Tribal concerns, including 

potential impacts to cultural resources, 

will be given due consideration. 

Federal, State, and local agencies, along 

with Tribes and other stakeholders that 

may be interested in or affected by the 

proposed action that the BLM is 

evaluating, are invited to participate in 

the scoping process and, if eligible, may 

request to participate in the 

environmental analysis as a cooperating 

agency. 

The BLM will evaluate identified 

issues and place them into one of three 

categories: 

1. Issues to be resolved in the RMP 

Amendment, 

2. Issues to be resolved through policy 

or administrative action, or 

3. Issues beyond the scope of these 

plans. 

The BLM will provide an explanation 

as to why an issue was placed in 

category two or three. The public is also 

encouraged to help identify any 

management questions and concerns 

that should be addressed in the RMP 

Amendment. The BLM will work 

collaboratively with interested parties to 

identify the management decisions that 

are best suited to local, regional, and 

national needs and concerns. 

The BLM will use an interdisciplinary 

approach to develop the EA/RMP 

Amendment in order to consider the 

variety of resource issues and concerns 

identified. Specialists with expertise in 

National Conservation Lands, recreation 

and visitor services, archaeology, 

wildlife, and vegetation may be 

involved in the EA/RMP Amendment. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.9, 43 CFR 1610.2) 

Mitchell Leverette, 

BLM Eastern States State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01184 Filed 1–20–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–CR–NPS0032650; 

PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP15.R50000, 

212P104215 (211); OMB Control Number 

1024–0018] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget for Review 

and Approval; Nomination of 

Properties for Listing in the National 

Register of Historic Places 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of information collection; 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we, 

the National Park Service are proposing 

to renew an information collection with 

revisions. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before February 

22, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

suggestions on the information 

collection request (ICR) should be 

submitted by the date specified above in 

DATES to http://www.reginfo.gov/public/ 

do/PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under Review—Open for 

Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. Please provide a copy 

of your comments to the NPS 

Information Collection Clearance Officer 

(ADIR–ICCO), 12201 Sunrise Valley 

Drive, (MS–242) Reston, VA 20191 

(mail); or phadrea_ponds@nps.gov 

(email). Please include ‘‘1024–0018’’ in 

the subject line of your comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request additional information about 

this ICR, contact Alexis Abernathy, 

National Register of Historic Places, by 

email at alexis_abernathy@nps.gov, or 

by telephone at 202 354–2236. 

Individuals who are hearing or speech 

impaired may call the Federal Relay 

Service at 1–800–877–8339 for TTY 

assistance. You may also view the ICR 

at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

accordance with the PRA and 5 CFR 

1320.8(d)(1), we provide the general 

public and other Federal agencies with 

an opportunity to comment on new, 

proposed, revised, and continuing 

collections of information. This helps us 

assess the impact of our information 

collection requirements and minimize 

the public’s reporting burden. It also 

helps the public understand our 

information collection requirements and 

provide the requested data in the 

desired format. 

A Federal Register notice with a 60- 

day public comment period soliciting 

comments on this collection of 

information was published on June 8, 

2021 (86 FR 30478). No comments were 

received. 

As part of our continuing effort to 

reduce paperwork and respondent 

burdens, we are again soliciting 

comments from the public and other 

Federal agencies on the proposed ICR 

that is described below. We are 

especially interested in public comment 

addressing the following: 

(1) Whether or not the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether or not the 

information will have practical utility. 

(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the 

burden for this collection of 

information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used. 

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected. 

(4) How might the agency minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of response. 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. Before including your 

address, phone number, email address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Abstract: The National Register of 

Historic Places (NRHP) is the official 

Federal list of districts, sites, buildings, 

structures, and objects significant in 

American history, architecture, 

archeology, engineering, and culture. 

National Register properties have 

significance to the history of 

communities, States, or the Nation. The 

National Historic Preservation Act of 

1966 requires the Secretary of the 

Interior to maintain and expand the 

National Register, and to establish 

criteria and guidelines for including 

properties on the National Register. 

National Register properties must be 

considered in the planning for Federal 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1