alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

 

TEXTRON INC.
 SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

 

(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 3, 2010)

 

 

Pursuant to Section 10 of the Textron Inc. Short-Term Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated effective January 3, 2010) (the “Plan”), Textron Inc. hereby amends the Plan, effective July 22, 2015, as follows:

 

1.   Section 1.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to provide that the Plan shall continue in effect until April 30, 2017.

 

2.   Section 9 of the Plan is hereby amended to add a new subsection 9.6 at the end of such section, as follows:

 

9.6 Clawback Provision. The Committee shall, in all appropriate circumstances, require reimbursement of any Final Award payment to an executive officer made following the effective date of this Amendment, where: (1) the payment was predicated upon achieving certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a substantial restatement of Company financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; (2) the Committee determines the executive engaged in intentional misconduct that caused or substantially caused the need for the substantial restatement; and (3) a lower payment would have been made to the executive based upon the restated financial results. In each such instance, the Company will, to the extent practicable, seek to recover from the individual executive the amount by which the individual executive’s incentive payments for the relevant period exceeded the lower payment that would have been made based on the restated financial results. For purposes of this provision, the term “executive officer” means any officer who has been designated an executive officer by the Board. In addition, all awards under the Plan are subject to all other clawback procedures of the Company, as in effect and as amended from time to time.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Textron Inc. has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer.

 

	
 
    	
TEXTRON INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated: July 22, 2015
    	
By
    	
/s/ Cheryl H. Johnson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Cheryl H. Johnson
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Executive Vice President,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Human Resources
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JERALD W. OVERLY,
Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-163
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, District Judge Walter H. Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.

ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD
OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”)
(DOC. 22); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $4,750.00 IN EAJA FEES

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint
stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees and costs under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $4,750.00. Doc. 22.
Based upon the parties’ stipulation in which they present no dispute that all requirements are met
for the reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties’ joint stipulation
(doc. 22); and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees and costs in the amount of $4,750.00. As no
further matters remain pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s
docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

045 LR ha

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with Amendment No. 1 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Sky One Medical, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Yan-qing,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  March
17, 2010




By:
                        /s/
      Liu Yan-qingName:  Liu
      Yan-qingTitle:  Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. and its 
continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on January 27, 2022.

PLACE:  1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC. (This meeting will be a 
virtual meeting).

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 
30109.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
* * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer. 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Vicktoria J. Allen,
Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-01200 Filed 1-18-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 17745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8246]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Vietnam

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act with respect to Vietnam, and I hereby 
waive this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 4, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.

    Editorial Note:  This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register March 19, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-06635 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
```
**                                                                             Exhibit      23**

**CONSENT      OF      INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          71,319
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,831
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               451,481
<PP&E>                                         258,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,153,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          245,454
<BONDS>                                        557,256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       834,378
<OTHER-SE>                                    (516,346)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,153,443
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               309,496
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  324,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (23,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       328
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (25,573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25,573)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.35)


</TABLE>
#### People v Smith,

No. 90779;

Court of Appeals No. 131980.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JEFFREY BLEVINS, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PREMIUM MERCHANT FUNDING ONE,

LLC,

Defendant.

No.: 2:18-cv-00377

DEFENDANT PREMIUM MERCHANT FUNDING ONE, LLC’S 

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

Premium Merchant Funding One, LLC (“Premium Merchant”), through its undersigned 

counsel, hereby moves the Court for an Order staying Plaintiff’s discovery propounded to 

Movants, or, in the alternative, for a protective order with respect thereto, pending this Court’s 

rulings on Premium Merchant’s pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.

A Memorandum in Support of this Motion is attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: August 6, 2018 /s/ James M. Doerfler

James M. Doerfler (OH #59350)

Reed Smith LLP

225 Fifth Avenue

Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Phone: 412-288-3280

E-mail: jdoerfler@reedsmith.com

Counsel for Defendant Premium Merchant 

Funding One, LLC

Case: 2:18-cv-00377-GCS-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/06/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 104
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 6

th day of August 2018, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings has been filed electronically and is available for 

viewing and downloading from the federal courts’ Electronic Case Filing system. 

/s/ James M. Doerfler

James M. Doerfler (OH # 59350)

Case: 2:18-cv-00377-GCS-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/06/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 105
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

JEFF DEY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:18-cv-106 

District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

DECISION AND ENTRY 

 This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion 

to Remand to the Commissioner. (Doc. #10). The parties agree that this case should be 

remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings, pursuant to 

sentence four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and 

respectfully request this Honorable Court enter an appropriate order with judgment. 

Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative 

Law Judge’s decision, and the Commissioner will conduct further proceedings and 

develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is under a 

disability as defined by the Social Security Act. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 

1. The parties’ Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner 

(Doc. #10) is ACCEPTED; 
2

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s 

favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security 

Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 

405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision 

and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and 

4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: November 13, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Scott D. Dalesandro, )

et al., )

) 

Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 1:01-CV-109

)

vs. )

)

International Paper )

Company, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Court’s phone conference with the

parties, Defendant International Paper’s brief on Flex Six

benefits is due February 9, 2005, Plaintiffs’ memorandum in

response is due February 21, 2005, and International Paper’s

reply brief is due March 4, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Date January 13, 2005 s/Sandra S. Beckwith 

 Sandra S. Beckwith, Chief Judge 

 United States District Court

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 89 Filed 01/13/2005 Page 1 of 1
II 

Calendar No. 397 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4628 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER R. HRBEK POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 216 Westwood Avenue in 

7 Westwood, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4628 RS

1 the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher 

7 R. Hrbek Post Office Building’’. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS

PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 397 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4628 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posttopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building’’. Westwood, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Sergeant Chris- al Service located at 216 Westwood Avenue in 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
July 26, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BRIAN KEITH WILLIAMS, Appellant

NO. 14-16-00443-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on May 3, 2016. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Brian Keith Williams.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
TYRONE JEROD COLE, JR., Case No. 1:18-cv-342
Plaintiff, Barrett, J.
Litkovitz, M.J.
vs.
DAVID MCCROSKEY, et al., ORDER
Defendants.

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, brings this civil rights
action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his Eighth Amendment rights by prison
employees.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for production of physical pictures of his injuries (Doc. 18),
his first set of interrogatories (Doc. 19), and a motion for production of documents (Doc. 20)
with the Court. Plaintiff is advised that he must serve his discovery requests on defendants
rather than file them with the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a) (“A party may serve on any other
party a request within the scope of Rule 26(b). . . .”). Accordingly, plaintiff's discovery motions
(Docs. 18, 19, 20) are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

are 2/9 Pein biog
Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAMIAN KING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2411

[October 24, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Daniel A. Casey, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 99-03889 CF10A.

Damian King, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 4.1



XXXX XXXX SEE   REVERSE SIDE INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FOR CERTAIN   DEFINITIONS FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.0001 PAR VALUE,   OF AXSOME THERAPEUTICS, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by   the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate   properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and   registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said   Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures   of its duly authorized officers. Dated: Herriot Tabuteau, M.D., President and   CEO Mark Jacobson, Secretary COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK   TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY (Brooklyn, New York) TRANSFER AGENT AND   REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE THIS CERTIFIES THAT XXXX S P E C I M E N is   the owner of XXXX CUSIP 05464T 10 4 


    




 










THE BOARD OF   THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE   RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER   THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON   WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE,   A FULL STATEMENT OF THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE   RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL   STOCK AS WELL AS THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE   RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES THEN OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED   TO BE ISSUED. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on   the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written   out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: UTMA – Custodian TEN   COM TEN ENT JT TEN – as tenants in common – as tenants by entireties – as   joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common (Cust)   (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (State) Additional   abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received   hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER   IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS   INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock   represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute   and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the   within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.   Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME   AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT   ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL   GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER)   WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM   (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM   (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE   DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
No. 1049.

#### Buttz v. Campbell.

April Term, 1881.

July 8th, 1881.

*T. M. Mordeeai,*for appellant. *O. W. Buttz,*contra.

Action om money demand and judgment by default, in December, 1879. A few days afterwards and during the same term, defendant gave notice of motion to open the default, upon affidavits showing that his failure to answer had been caused by illness, and that he had a good defence. The motion was heard upon these affidavits, and upon counter-affidavits which raised a conflict of statement. The Circuit judge refused the motion, and defendant then excepted and gave notice of appeal, and two days after the rising of the court gave to plaintiff formal notice of appeal. Defendant claimed that the Circuit Court should have granted the motion under Section 197 of the code. Plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal, because no exception was served upon the respondent or the Circuit judge within ten days after the rising of the court. *Held*— .

1. That there was no ground for the motion to dismiss the appeal.

2. That no error of law was disclosed in the order refusing the motion to open the default, and it must, therefore, be assumed that the order was the result of the conclusion of the Circuit judge as to the weight of the evidence, a conclusion with which this court cannot interfere. Opinion by

MoIyer, A. J.,
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of SpatiaLight, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to their
knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/ ROBERT A. OLINS
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert A. Olins
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/TIMOTHY V. DESCAMPS
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Timothy V. Descamps
                                        Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2004


                                       30
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-16220, Form S-8 No. 33-16084, Form S-8 No. 33-60926, and Form
S-8 No. 333-10813 pertaining to the Incentive Stock Option Plan, the
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan and the
1995 Stock Option Plan) of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. of our report
dated February 19, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Fayetteville, Arkansas
March 30,  1999


                                       52