alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

GLASSCO FAIRROW, : 

Petitioner, Case No. 3:18-cv-232 

- vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

WARDEN, Correctional Reception Center, 

Respondent. : 

ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 8), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. ' 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing 

such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report 

and Recommendations. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice. 

Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to 

the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore 

should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. 

September 10, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 Thomas M. Rose 

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4049 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4049

            To extend temporarily the duty suspension on 2-
                  (Methoxycarbonyl)benzylsulfonamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 2009

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend temporarily the duty suspension on 2-
                  (Methoxycarbonyl)benzylsulfonamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-(METHOXYCARBONYL)BENZYLSULFONAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.35 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-
(Methoxycarbonyl)benzylsulfonamide) is amended, in the effective period 
column, by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2012''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                  1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                  Sep-28-1996
<CASH>                                         2,189
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  171,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,238
<PP&E>                                          392,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  698,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           158,844
<BONDS>                                         100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                      262,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    698,359
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                988,997
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   938,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,561
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        


</TABLE>
#### Carl WIDMER *v.*GIBBLE OIL COMPANY

5-4423

421 S. W. 2d 886

Opinion delivered December 18, 1967

*Carl Widmer,*pro se.

*Warner, Warner, Ragon & Smith,*for appellee.

CakletoN Harris, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Carl Widmer, brings this appeal from the judgment entered *736by the Sebastian County Circuit Court on a credit card account, after an original trial in the Fort Smith Municipal Court from which an adverse judgment was appealed. The Circuit Court tried the case on stipulated facts. It is here contended, first, that service had upon appellant was void on its face, and second, that there was accord and satisfaction. The first point is controlled by our opinion in *Widmer*v. *Price Oil Co. Inc.,*Case No. 4424, which is handed down this day.

Gibble Oil Company instituted a suit on November 23, 1966, asking judgment for $67.80, plus costs and interest, from the appellant. On November 30, 1966, Widmer sent his check to appellee in the amount of $9.01,- the cheek being marked, “Full payment of all accounts to date.” Gibble then cashed the check. This is the only factual difference between this case and *Widmer*v. *Price Oil Company,*for in that case, the check sent in a less amount [than that owed) was not cashed. This fact, however, is immaterial. As pointed out in *Price,*there must be a disputed amount involved, and a consent to accept less than that amount in settlement of the whole before there can be an accord and satisfaction. The authorities cited there are controlling here, and one cited case, *Nordlinger*v. *Libow,*240 N. Y. S. 193, did involve the creditor’s cashing a check from the debtor for a lesser amount than was due, and marked, “Full settlement of any and all claims.” This holding is in accord with 6 Corbin on Contracts, Section 1277, Page 123, where it is said:

> “It is not enough for the debtor merely to write on >a voucher or on his check such words as ‘in full payment’ or ‘to balance account,’ where there has been no such dispute or antecedent discussion as to give reasonable notice to the creditor that the check is being tendered as full satisfaction.”

In addition, we have held that a dispute or controversy about the amount of an account must be made in *737good faith, *i. e.,*there mast be a *bona fide*dispute. In *Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company*v. *People’s Loan and Investment Company,*191 Ark. 982, this court, quoting 1 C. J. 554, said:

> “ ‘While it is not necessary that the dispute or controversy should he well founded, it is necessary that it should be made in good faith.’ ”

As stated in *Price,*there is no evidence that Widmer denies that he actually owed the full amount demanded. In fact, it is stipulated that “as of November 23, 1966, the defendant Carl Widmer owed the amount of $67.80 to the Gibble Oil Company as result of credit card purchases made by said defendant from the plaintiff.” Further, that “prior to November 30, 1966 [the sending of the check], no communication was exchanged between plaintiff, G-ibble Oil Company, and defendant, *Carl Widmer,*in regard to the correctness or validity of said account.”

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,905                  27,766
<SECURITIES>                                    22,679                   7,107
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,647                   7,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                       913                     776
<INVENTORY>                                        371                     697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,210                  44,865
<PP&E>                                           8,170                   6,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,455                   4,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,398                  50,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,051                  10,254
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            93                      92
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,235                  40,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,398                  50,915
<SALES>                                         23,542                  20,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,542                  20,778
<CGS>                                            2,737                   3,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,523                  20,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (43)                      18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   104                      96
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (113)                   1,291
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (40)                     471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (73)                     820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (73)                     820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)                     .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)                     .09
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF WINDSOR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 8 AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE
RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         115,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,652,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 870,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,896,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,358,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,121,700
<COMMON>                                     1,922,900
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,024,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,896,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               294,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30932]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, February 11, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Briefing Agenda

    This briefing is open to the public.
    Topic: Disparate Impact in School Discipline Policies.
I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
II. Speakers' Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.
IV. Adjourn Briefing.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: December 3, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-30932 Filed 12-6-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 24, 2020

b1116

Order 

Clerk

November 24, 2020

161049 & (21)(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161049

COA: 350249

St Clair CC: 02-000601-FC

JOHN ALBERT GILLIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to supplement and motion for immediate 

consideration are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2019 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 124-3 Filed 04/15/2004 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 124-3 Filed 04/15/2004 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 124-3 Filed 04/15/2004 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 124-3 Filed 04/15/2004 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 124-3 Filed 04/15/2004 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 124-3 Filed 04/15/2004 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 124-3 Filed 04/15/2004 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:01-cv-00111-HJW Document 124-3 Filed 04/15/2004 Page 8 of 8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Audra R. Bester,
Plaintiff(s),
Case Number: 1:18cev156
vs.
Judge Susan J. Dlott
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant(s).
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on June 26, 2019 (Doc. 17), to whom this case was referred
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the
time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired July 10, 2019, hereby
ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This case is hereby
TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Susan J. if
United States District Court
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jerry C. YoungJerry C. YoungChief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

F O R T H E SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

DONALD PYLES, SUSAN 

SCHROEDER, on behalf of themselves 

and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NICOR ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 

Case No. 3:18-cv-00152 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT 

 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Case Pending 

Settlement. The Court having reviewed the matter hereby GRANTS the motion. This matter is 

hereby STAYED pending the approval of the settlement of this action. The parties are 

ORDERED to notify the Court fourteen days after receiving an order from the Southern District 

of Indiana on final approval of the settlement. 

 The Court would ORDER that a status report be submitted to the Court every 60 days 

until final approval of the settlement. 

Dated: July 5, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 _________________________________ 

 Judge, Southern District of Ohio 

Case: 3:18-cv-00152-TMR Doc #: 12 Filed: 07/05/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 140
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:18-cr-41

Judge Marbley

Cesar Alberto Ramos-Rojas 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 25) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on these counts. The Court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: March 29, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas E. Bergmann, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USF Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: November 8, 2004                                                          /s/ Thomas E. Bergmann   Thomas E. Bergmann   Principal Executive Officerand Principal FinancialOfficer  
26