alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LINCARE HOLDINGS, INC FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,927
<INVENTORY>                                      1,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,752
<PP&E>                                         163,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 378,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,075
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           283
<OTHER-SE>                                     321,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   378,731
<SALES>                                        101,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,012
<CGS>                                           15,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,005
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
        

</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2679

_____________________________

BRITTNYE JOADELLE HAMBLIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

March 22, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, BILBREY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell Dixon, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: March 17, 2016 106878

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEON BEVERLY, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: February 18, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________ Aaron A. Louridas, Delmar, for appellant. Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Peter H. Willis of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Rose, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Drago, J.), rendered January 13, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of assault in the second degree and perjury in the first degree. In satisfaction of a 12-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree and perjury in the first degree. He also waived his right to appeal, both orally and in writing. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to four years in prison to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision on the assault conviction, and 3 to 6 years in prison on the perjury conviction, said sentences to run consecutively. Defendant now appeals.-2- 106878

Defendant's primary contention is that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and that this rendered his guilty plea involuntary. Although this type of claim is not foreclosed by a valid waiver of the right to appeal, it has not been preserved for our review as there is no indication in the record that defendant made an appropriate postallocution motion (see People v Broomfield, 128 AD3d 1271, 1271-1272 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1086 [2015]; People v Brown, 128 AD3d 1273, 1274 [2015]). Defendant next challenges the severity of the sentence – a challenge that is precluded by a valid waiver of the right to appeal. However, we find that the waiver here was invalid inasmuch as it does not appear that defendant was advised that the right to appeal was separate and distinct from the other rights that he was forfeiting by pleading guilty (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Pope, 129 AD3d 1389, 13989-1390 [2015]; People v Burgette, 118 AD3d 1034, 1035 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1118 [2015]). Turning to the merits, we note that defendant has a lengthy criminal record and agreed to the sentence as part of a favorable plea agreement that exposed him to less time in prison than if he was convicted after trial. Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Miller, 66 AD3d 1242, 1243-1244 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 772 [2010]; People v Humphrey, 13 AD3d 815, 816 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 799 [2005]). Peters, P.J., Garry and Devine, JJ., concur.-3- 106878

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of HF Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Curtis L. Hage, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Curtis L. Hage                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Curtis L. Hage, Chairman,  President |
|   | and Chief Executive  Officer         |
|   |                                 |
|   | Date:                                | November 12, 2010 |

 

----

*                                         A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to HF Financial Corp. and will be retained by HF Financial Corp. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4915]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 17 March 2011, at 10 a.m. in the Commission offices at the National 
Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., 
Washington DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, 
parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by e-mailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: February 28, 2011 in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4915 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 459 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 459

               For the relief of Alfredo Ramirez Vasquez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2009

Mr. Pastor of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Alfredo Ramirez Vasquez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, OR DENIAL OF ADMISSION TO, 
              ALFREDO RAMIREZ VASQUEZ.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding sections 212(a) and 237(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, Alfredo Ramirez Vasquez may not be 
removed from the United States, or denied admission to the United 
States, by reason of any act of his that is a ground for removal or 
denial of admission and is reflected in the records of the Department 
of Homeland Security, or the Visa Office of the Department of State, on 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Rescission of Outstanding Order of Removal.--The Secretary of 
Homeland Security shall rescind any outstanding order of removal, or 
any finding of inadmissibility or deportability, that has been entered 
against Alfredo Ramirez Vasquez by reason of any act described in 
subsection (a).
    (c) Establishment of Good Moral Character.--Notwithstanding section 
101(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, any act described in 
subsection (a) may not be considered in determining whether Alfredo 
Ramirez Vasquez is, or during any period has been, a person of good 
moral character for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
H. R. 4360 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs blind rehabilitation center in 

Long Beach, California, as the ‘‘Major Charles Robert Soltes, Jr., O.D. Department 

of Veterans Affairs Blind Rehabilitation Center’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS BLIND 

REHABILITATION CENTER, LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs blind rehabilitation center 

in Long Beach, California, shall after the date of the enactment 

of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Major Charles Robert 

Soltes, Jr., O.D. Department of Veterans Affairs Blind Rehabilitation Center’’. Any reference to such blind rehabilitation center in 

any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

United States shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Major 

Charles Robert Soltes, Jr., O.D. Department of Veterans Affairs 

Blind Rehabilitation Center’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Form of 409A Amendment to Stock Rights Award Agreements




 Exhibit 10(b)(i) 
 Employee 
 REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION 
 409A Amendment to Stock Rights Award Agreements 
 THIS AGREEMENT is made as of
the 31st day of December, 2008 by and between «F1» (the “Employee”) and Regency Centers Corporation (the “Company”). 
 Background 
 The Company has previously made stock rights awards to the Employee pursuant to one or
more Stock Rights Award Agreements covering shares of stock that remain unvested as of the date hereof (collectively, after giving effect to any amendments prior to the date hereof, the “Agreements”). 
 The parties wish to amend the Agreements to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. 
 Accordingly, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Termination of Service. For purposes of any accelerated vesting provisions of the Agreements that provide for acceleration in certain circumstances upon termination of employment, the Employee’s employment shall not be
considered to have terminated unless the Employee’s employment is considered terminated for purposes of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h)(ii). 
 2. No Other Changes. Except as expressly amended hereby, the provisions of the Agreements shall remain in full force and effect. 
 [Signature page follows] 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

			
	REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Christian Leavitt

		 	J. Christian Leavitt
		 	Its Senior Vice President/Treasurer
	
	“Company”
	
	  

	Name:	 	«F1»
	
	“Employee”


  

 2 









 Director 
 REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION 
 409A Amendment to Stock Rights Award Agreements 
 THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 31st day of December, 2008 by and between «F2» (the “Director”) and Regency Centers
Corporation (the “Company”). 
 Background 
 The Company has previously made stock rights awards to the Director pursuant to Stock Rights Award Agreements covering shares of stock that remain unvested as of the date hereof (collectively, the
“Agreements”). 
 The parties wish to amend the Agreements to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. 
 Accordingly, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Termination of Service. For purposes of any accelerated vesting provisions of the Agreements that provide for acceleration in certain circumstances when the Director ceases to serve as a director, the Director will be considered
to have ceased services on the date that the Director experiences a “separation from service” within the meaning of Code Section 409A. 
 2. No Other Changes. Except as expressly amended hereby, the provisions of the Agreements shall remain in full force and effect. 
 [Signature page follows] 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

			
	REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Christian Leavitt

		 	J. Christian Leavitt
		 	Its Senior Vice President/Treasurer
	
	“Company”
	
	  

	Name:	 	«F2»
	
	“Director”


  

 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

:

Plaintiff,

:

vs. Case No. 3:18cr92

:

JEREMY WELLS, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

:

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

BOND (DOC.#42); RIGHT OF APPEAL EXPLAINED 

Pursuant to telephone conferences held between Court and counsel, upon the record, on 

April 9 and April 13, 2020, this Court OVERRULES the Defendant’s Motion for Bond in its 

entirety, concluding that there is no condition or combination of conditions such as to guarantee 

the Defendant’s appearance when required and/or the safety of any other person and the 

community. 

In ruling as aforesaid, the Court has placed great weight on the psychological evaluation 

from Dr. Kara Marciani, Psy.D., who has opined that Mr. Wells has a high risk of reoffending 

and has verbalized little insight into his offense behavior, particularly his sexual interest in 

minors. 

Defendant, to whom a copy of this Entry is sent, is advised that he has fourteen days from 

the filing of this Decision and Entry to appeal this Court’s decision rendered herein to a higher 

court. He is entitled to the services of an attorney to aid him in such an appeal. Should he wish to 

Case: 3:18-cr-00092-WHR Doc #: 43 Filed: 04/28/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 158
2

appeal and desires an attorney to represent him, the Court will appoint an attorney for him, at no 

cost, to assist him in such an appeal. 

________________________________________

April 24, 2020 WALTER H. RICE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Jeremy Wells, c/o Shelby County Jail, 555 Gearhart Rd, Sidney, OH 45365

Case: 3:18-cr-00092-WHR Doc #: 43 Filed: 04/28/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 159
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000799033
<NAME>                                         Airlease LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         2
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 67,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          433
<BONDS>                                        10,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     55,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   67,787
<SALES>                                        7,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,614
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,708
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,708
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,708
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.01



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION

Zoe Wilson, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

Civil Action 2:18-cv-743 

v. Judge George C. Smith 

Magistrate Judge Deavers

Abbott Home Care, Inc., et al.,

Defendants. 

ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION 

AND APPROVING NOTICE AND CONSENT 

 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Pre-Discovery 

Conditional Class Certification and Court-Supervised Notice to Potential Opt-in Plaintiffs 

Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §216(b) (Doc. 17). For good cause shown, the parties’ joint stipulation to 

conditionally certify the case as a collective action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and that notice 

be provided to putative class members of Plaintiffs’ FLSA claims is GRANTED.

 The Court APPROVES the Notice of Collective action Lawsuit and Consent to Join, 

attached as Exhibits, to the parties’ joint stipulation. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000880634
<NAME>                        Hymedix, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          54,676
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    366,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               626,281
<PP&E>                                         838,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                 766,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 975,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,906,352
<BONDS>                                      1,131,570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,572
<COMMON>                                         5,713
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,967,387)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   975,250
<SALES>                                        220,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               364,016
<CGS>                                          142,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  558,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (291,846)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (291,846)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (291,846)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>