alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0454

THERON JAMES BLAKE, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 27, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 19 2020

03/19/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0454
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Premiere
Technologies and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                  10,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0                     161
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  76,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                (11,198)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 107,473
<PP&E>                                               0                 282,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               (162,173)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 753,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 265,030
<BONDS>                                              0                 172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                     479
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 309,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 753,231
<SALES>                                        116,248                 343,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,248                 343,502
<CGS>                                           33,175                  97,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,406                 397,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   342                (13,137)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,751                  19,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (53,098)               (111,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,689)                (20,547)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,409)                (91,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,409)                (91,008)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.89)                  (1.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.89)                  (1.97)


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40960 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN FLORES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 168

- 1

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent Juan Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has filed a response , he has requested to substitute retained couns el for appointed counsel, and he seeks leave to file a substitute brief

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40960 Document: 00512790753 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/02/2014No. 13

- 40960
Included in Flores’s response is his argument that the FPD has rende red ineffective assistance on appeal by failing to order a rearraignment transcript and assess whether the district court properly admonished him about certain aspects of his plea and whether the Government complied with the plea agreement. We generally d o not review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal

. United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014), petition for cert. filed (June 4, 2014) (No. 13

- 10484). However, this is a rare case in which the record permits us to “ fairly evaluate the merits of the claim .” Id. In light of Flores’s declaration evincing his intent to appeal only his sentence, the FPD’s omissions in this regard are not objectively unreasonable. See United States v. Garcia , 483 F.3d 289, 29 0

- 9 1 (5th C ir. 2007)

. Further, assuming deficient performance, Flores cannot show prejudice because we now have access to the rearraignment transcript and have independently examined the record for any potentially nonfrivolous appellate issues. Absent a showing of both deficient performance and prejudice, Flores’s ineffective

- assistance argument fails. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Our independent review of counsel’s brief , Flores’s response, and the record , including a copy of the rearraignment transcript , leads us to concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, the motion s to substitute counsel and for leave to file a substitute brief are DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40960 Document: 00512790753 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/02/2014
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Darrel Wayne Brown v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-19-00440-CR

Trial court case number: 1487463

Trial court: 228th District Court of Harris County

Appellee, the State of Texas, has requested an extension of time in which to file its brief. 

Appellee’s motion is granted. Appellee’s brief is due April 27, 2020.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss________________

Acting individually 

Date: April 2, 2020
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE> 5
  <MULTIPLIER> 1,000

  <S>                                  <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
  <PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1999
  <CASH>                               4,910
  <SECURITIES>                         0
  <RECEIVABLES>                        35,000
  <ALLOWANCES>                         0
  <INVENTORY>                          0
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                     39,910
  <PP&E>                               40,000
  <DEPRECIATION>                       0
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                       79,910
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                165,851
  <BONDS>                              0
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
  <PREFERRED>                          0
  <COMMON>                             59,292
  <OTHER-SE>                          <145,233>
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         79,910
  <SALES>                              0
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                     0
  <CGS>                                0
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                        201,474
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                     <6,166>
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                      <211,571>
  <INCOME-TAX>                         0
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                  <207,640>
  <DISCONTINUED>                       <3,931>
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
  <CHANGES>                            0
  <NET-INCOME>                         <211,571>
  <EPS-BASIC>                        (0.06)
  <EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.06)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 21st day of September, 2005.





| | /s/ Brian Nichols                    
| | -------------------------------------
| | Brian Nichols
Chief Executive Officer









---
<page>





	EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Global
Perspective Portfolio L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin
Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation,
the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		May 16, 2005
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 599 

Honoring the life and legacy of Judge Lee Roy West. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2020 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself and Mr. INHOFE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and legacy of Judge Lee Roy West. 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West was born in Clayton, Oklahoma, on November 26, 1929, and died on April 24, 

2020, in Muskogee, Oklahoma; 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West was the youngest of 4 children 

in a family he called ‘‘too poor to paint and too proud 

to whitewash’’; 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West graduated from Antlers High 

School in 1948 and hitchhiked to Norman, Oklahoma, to 

attend the University of Oklahoma; 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West received a bachelor of arts degree from the University of Oklahoma in 1952; 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West graduated from Harvard Law 

School with a juris doctor in 1956 and later earned a 

master of laws from Harvard Law School in 1963; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 599 ATS 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West served the United States with 

the 3rd Marine Division in Japan and the 1st Marine Division in Korea; 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West practiced law— 

(1) in Ada, Oklahoma, from 1956 to 1961 and from 

1963 to 1965; and 

(2) in Tulsa, Oklahoma, from 1978 to 1979; 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West taught law at the University 

of Oklahoma College of Law from 1961 to 1962 and was 

a Ford Foundation fellow at Harvard Law School from 

1962 to 1963; 

Whereas Governor Henry Bellmon appointed Judge Lee Roy 

West to serve as a State court judge for the 22nd Judicial District of Oklahoma, where he served from 1965 to 

1973; 

Whereas, in 1973, President Richard Nixon appointed Judge 

Lee Roy West to the Civil Aeronautics Board in Washington, D.C.; 

Whereas, on September 28, 1979, President Jimmy Carter 

nominated Judge Lee Roy West to serve on the United 

States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma; 

Whereas the Senate confirmed the nomination of Judge Lee 

Roy West on October 31, 1979; 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West served as chief justice of the 

United States District Court for the Western District of 

Oklahoma from 1993 to 1994; 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West served on the Federal bench 

in Oklahoma City for nearly 40 years; and 

Whereas Judge Lee Roy West was inducted into— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 599 ATS 

(1) the Field Trial Hall of Fame in Grand Junction, 

Tennessee in 2004; and 

(2) the Oklahoma Hall of Fame in 2012: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors— 

2 (1) the life and legacy of Judge Lee Roy West; 

3 and 

4 (2) the commitment of Judge Lee Roy West to 

5 his family, the law, Oklahoma, and the United 

6 States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 21, 2018

NO. 03-17-00299-CR

Chano Casarez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND TOTH

AFFIRMED IN PART; MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED IN PART --

OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgments for Counts II, III, and V. Therefore, the Court affirms the judgments for 

Counts II, III, and V. However, there was error in the trial court’s judgments for Counts I and IV

that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgments for Counts I 

and IV to reflect that appellant pleaded guilty to those counts. The judgments for those counts, 

as modified, are affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication 

of costs is made.
| Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Joseph P. Caruso, and I, Paul S. Weiner certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:     (1)    
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)    
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits Staff upon request.Dated: November 4, 2008      By:   /s/ Joseph P. Caruso         Joseph P. Caruso President and Chief Executive Officer    Dated: November 4, 2008      By:   /s/ Paul S. Weiner         Paul S. Weiner Chief Financial Officer    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1434-1435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00325]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-939]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Curia 
Missouri Inc.

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Curia Missouri Inc. has applied to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before March 14, 2022. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before March 14, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on August 19, 2021, Curia Missouri Inc., 2460 West 
Bennett Street, Springfield, Missouri 65807, applied to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled 
substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Controlled  substance            Drug code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid..........            2010  I

[[Page 1435]]

 
Amphetamine........................            1100  II
Lisdexamphetamine..................            1205  II
Methylphenidate....................            1724  II
Phenylacetone......................            8501  II
Tapentadol.........................            9780  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to bulk manufacture the above-listed controlled 
substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. No other 
activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration.

Brian S. Besser,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-00325 Filed 1-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, CurtisL. Hage, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HF Financial Corp.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financing reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | May 12, 2006                            |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                    |   |
|   |   /s/ Curtis L. Hage          |   |   |
|   | Curtis L. Hage, Chairman, President and |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                 |   |
|        |                                         |        |  |  |

 

1

----