alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Lloyd Lapidus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Clicker Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Clicker Inc.





Date:  July 20, 2011
By:
/s/ LLOYD LAPIDUSLloyd Lapidus

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2133

SAMUEL L. SHELTON,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(96-881-BLA)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 14, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel L. Shelton, Petitioner Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, Helen

Hart Cox, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel L. Shelton seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West

1986 & Supp. 1998). Our review of the record discloses that the

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

Board. Shelton v. DOWCP, No. 96-881-BLA (B.R.B. May 5, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2

                  Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1530, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            I, William P. Keane, the Chief Financial Officer of Genta
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

      3.    The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
            March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934, as amended; and

      4.    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


            /s/ WILLIAM P. KEANE
            ------------------------------
            Name:  William P. Keane
            Title: Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANA EVERETT YOUNG,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 841 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of June, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

DAVID E. KIDD, : Case No. 3:18-cv-131 

 

Petitioner, : 

- vs - : District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

 : 

WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional 

Institution, : 

Respondent. : 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 

Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 25), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b), and 

noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. 

Accordingly, it is ordered that Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 24) is 

DENIED. 

May7, 2019 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 Thomas M. Rose 

United States District Judge
Mr. m. W. Graham

County Attorney Ozona, Texas Dear Mr. Graham: Re: Opinion O-55 Delinquent

taxes This office is in receipt of ywz letter requesting an opinionas to whether the countyand state can enforcethe collection of delincluent

taxes on land for years that such land was omitted from the regulartax rolls.

We refer you to Chapter 11, Title I.22 of the Revised Civil Statutes,

which provides

for the assesswnt of such properties and collection

of the taxes thereon w?kth certainexceptions

as set forth in Article 7346. Yaws very truly ATTORNEYGENERALOF TEXAS s/ Glenn R. Lewis

By Glenn R. Lewis Assistant GRL:n APPROVED: GERALD C. MANN ATTORlVBY

GENERALOF TEXAS
Exhibit




AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE
NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTAL THRIFT-INCENTIVE PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2008)




WHEREAS, the Northern Trust Corporation (the “Corporation”) maintains the Northern Trust Corporation Supplemental Thrift-Incentive Plan, As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan is now considered desirable;


NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the amending power reserved to the Corporation under section 7.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2015, to delete Section 2.1(a)(iii) of the Plan in its entirety and to substitute the following therefor:


		
	“(iii)
	An employee of the Company who is ineligible to participate in the Plan on the first day of a Plan Year (i) because he was not eligible for the Qualified Plan on the first day of the Plan Year, or (ii) because his Salary did not exceed the Code Section 401(a)(17) limitation for the prior Plan Year, or (iii) on account of both of the reasons described in clauses (i) and (ii), and who as of any subsequent date during such Plan Year is both  eligible for the Qualified Plan and has received Salary in such Plan Year that exceeds the compensation limit set forth in Code Section 401(a)(17), shall become eligible to participate in the Plan for that Plan Year only for purposes of Supplemental Matching Contributions. Such eligibility shall be effective as of the date such employee has received Salary in such Plan Year that exceeds the Code Section 401(a)(17) limit or, if later, as of the date he first becomes eligible to receive Matching Contributions under the Qualified Plan in that Plan Year. Such Supplemental Matching Contributions shall be based on the employee's rate of contribution to the Qualified Plan on the date his contributions to the Qualified Plan ceased and on the Salary he receives in that Plan Year after first becoming eligible to participate in the Plan pursuant to the preceding two sentences."






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this amendment to be executed on its behalf this 6th day of August, 2015, effective as of January 1, 2015.


	
			
	 
	NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
	 

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Kathryn A. O’Neill
	 

	Name:
	Kathryn A. O’Neill
	 

	Title:
	Senior Vice President,
	 

	 
	Compensation, Benefits and Global Mobility
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NT Holding Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the
period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, James Loo, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 17, 2007

/S/ James Loo
James Loo,
Chief Financial Officer
GOVERNOR SEAN PARNELL 

August 6, 20 12 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Essential Air Service for Akutan 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

P.O. Box 196900 

Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6900 

Main: 907.269.0730 

Fax: 907.269.0489 

I want to inform you that the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities 

(DOT &PF) built a new airport in the Aleutian Islands called Akutan airport. The runway is 

paved and is 4,500 feet long by 75 feet wide. It has Medium Intensity Runway Lights (MIRLs), 

Medium Intensity Taxiway Lights (MITLs), and a rotating beacon. Our new airport has an 

ICAO identifier PAUT and an FAA location identifier of7AK. I anticipate that Akutan airport 

(PAUT) will begin operations on or about September 1, 2012 and will serve the community of 

Akutan, Alaska. 

Additionally I want to let you know that the DOT &PF is buying and will operate and maintain 

an Automatic Weather Observations System (AWOS), which we anticipate having operational 

this September. The A WOS will have a local altimeter, broadcast weather information on a local 

CT AF, and be available by an 800 telephone number. Also we have been working with FAA 

Western Flight Procedures Team to have approach procedures published by July 2013. 

Therefore I request Essential Air Service change air service location from Akutan Seaplane Base 

(KQA) to our new ground based Akutan airport (7 AK). I believe our new airport will greatly 

improve access to the community of Akutan, Alaska. 

Sincerely, 

Steven .~ D. Hatter 

Deputy Commissioner - Aviation 

"Get Alaska Moving through service and infi·astructure. "
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph P. Caruso, and I, Paul S. Weiner certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.








Dated: November 5, 2010











By: /s/ Joseph P. Caruso


Joseph P. Caruso


President and Chief Executive Officer








Dated: November 5, 2010











By: /s/ Paul S. Weiner


Paul S. Weiner


Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000798954
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM II-9, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         6573
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23187
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               30691
<PP&E>                                         1518829
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1155957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 393563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          88748
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     304815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   393563
<SALES>                                        206032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206032
<CGS>                                          103224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               33883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   68925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

JOSHUA FRANKLIN, : Case No. 1:17-cv-857
Petitioner,

-VS- District Judge Susan J. Dlott
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution

Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 18), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and
noting no objections were filed thereafter, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice.
Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to
the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore

should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

gee Aaae.§ Ditt

SYsan J. Dlott
United en District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         945,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,096,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,228,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              125
<BONDS>                                      3,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     468,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,228,210
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               641,132
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             562,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,595)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Element
      21 Golf Co. (Element) agrees to employ John T. Grippo as its Chief Financial
      Officer. Mr. Grippo will work part time as an independent contractor, while
      serving as Chief Financial Officer. The initial term of employment will begin
      March 1, 2006 and expire the earlier of the raising of $1,000,000 of its
      expected convertible debt offering or August 31,2006. During the initial term
      of
      this agreement Element will pay Mr. Grippo $3,000 in cash per month and $5,000
      in Element common stock per month. The amount of stock to be issued will be
      based upon the lowest closing price of Element common stock during the initial
      period. The Element common stock will be issued within 30 days of the end of
      the
      initial period. Element will reimburse Mr. Grippo’s expenses incurred on behalf
      of Element. Element will not require Mr. Grippo to relocate.





After
      the
      termination of the initial term, Element will employ Mr. Grippo for a six month
      period under the same terms and conditions, except that Element will pay Mr.
      Grippo $6,000 in cash per month and $2,000 in Element common stock per month.
      The agreement may be extended on the condition that both Element and Mr. Grippo
      agree to extend the agreement.





All
      stock
      will be issued in whatever name Mr. Grippo and in whatever denominations Mr.
      Grippo requests. All stock issuances will be adjusted for stock splits,
      dividends or other changes to the common stock. All stock issued will be freely
      tradable and issued without restriction. Element will extend any and all
      indemnification rights and D and O insurance (if any) coverage to Mr. Grippo
      in
      his capacity as Chief Financial Officer as allowed by
      law.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JOSE ANTONIO SHUL-CRUZ, AKA Jose 

Antonio Shul, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 21-10272 

D.C. No. 2:21-cr-00391-GMS-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Antonio Shul-Cruz appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry of a 

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Shul-Cruz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-10272 

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have 

provided Shul-Cruz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se 

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Shul-Cruz waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our 

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United 

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss 

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
<page>		            EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.		The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5.		The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  May 17, 2004          /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 President,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 general partner of the registrant
#### Elkins v Department of Corrections,

No. 90897;

Court of Appeals No. 130398.