alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 1 of 19  PAGEID #: 890

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 2 of 19  PAGEID #: 891

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 3 of 19  PAGEID #: 892

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 4 of 19  PAGEID #: 893

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 5 of 19  PAGEID #: 894

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 6 of 19  PAGEID #: 895

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 7 of 19  PAGEID #: 896

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 8 of 19  PAGEID #: 897

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 9 of 19  PAGEID #: 898

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 10 of 19  PAGEID #: 899

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 11 of 19  PAGEID #: 900

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 12 of 19  PAGEID #: 901

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 13 of 19  PAGEID #: 902

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 14 of 19  PAGEID #: 903

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 15 of 19  PAGEID #: 904

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 16 of 19  PAGEID #: 905

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 17 of 19  PAGEID #: 906

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 18 of 19  PAGEID #: 907

Case: 2:18-cv-00238-EAS-CMV Doc #: 91 Filed: 09/27/19 Page: 19 of 19  PAGEID #: 908
Exhibit 32.1

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Superconductor Corporation (the Company) for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Gregory J. Yurek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 5, 2009 |  | /S/ GREGORY J. YUREK   
|                       |  | Gregory J. Yurek       
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PREMIERE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          47,009                  47,009
<SECURITIES>                                    51,988                  51,988
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,999                  72,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (13,693)                (13,693)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               217,417                 217,417
<PP&E>                                         208,619                 208,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                (85,456)                (85,456)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 939,736                 939,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          275,062                 275,062
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           465                     465
<OTHER-SE>                                     439,149                 439,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   939,736                 939,736
<SALES>                                        121,435                 206,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,435                 206,336
<CGS>                                           37,620                  63,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,620                  63,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,045                 177,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,942)                 (5,422)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,243)                (40,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,291)                 (6,904)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,952)                (33,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,952)                (33,712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)                  (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)                  (0.79)
        



</TABLE>
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 

CASE NUMBER: P07-0453

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS 

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL: 1-2 3 

KEYWORDS: AQUATOX-A,C, IRR-S,E,L,MM, CORROS, NEURO 

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT: 

FATE: solid with mp = 77 EC (M) 

log Kow for the covalent ion pair = 1.7 (EPI) 

low Kow for the = 4.4 (ClogP), 4.5 (EPI) 

S = 1.5 g/L at 20 EC (P) 

vp < 1.0E-6 mm Hg or torr at 25 EC (P) 

bp > 500 EC (P) 

H < 1.0E-8 (P) 

log Koc = 3.8 (P) 

log fish BCF = 0.50 (P) 

sorption to sludge = low (P) 

POTW removal = 50 to 75% via sorption and biodegradation 

time for complete ultimate aerobic biodegradation = weeks 

sorption to soils and sediments = moderate 

PBT Potential: P1B1T2 

*CEB FATE: migration to ground water = slow 

HEALTH: Absorption nil thru skin, good thru lungs, and good thru GI tract based on 

physical/chemical properties; 

test data for the were: 

(1) mouse acute oral LD0 = 100 mg/kg 

(2) mouse acute oral LD17 = 200 mg/kg 

(3) mouse acute oral LD50 = 320 mg/kg 

(4) mouse acute oral LD67 = 500 mg/kg 

(5) rat acute oral LD50 = 340 mg/kg 

(6) rabbit acute dermal LD50 = l60 mg/kg 

(7) slight eye irritation in rabbits 

(8) moderate skin irrigation in rabbits 

(9) rat acute inhalation approximate lethal dose = 540 mg/m3 

 ( ); 

(10) rat 4-h inhalation LC50 = 6.6 ppm = 0.5 mg/L ( ); 
(11) rat 28-d inhalation ( ) with doses at 120, 62, and 29 

 ppm with LOEC = 29 ppm based on lethargy at all doses; 

 irritation at 120 ppm (8e14554); 

(12) mouse micronucleus via oral route was negative at 150 mg/kg 

 (8e15105); 

concern for neurotoxicity from ; 

concern for neurotoxicity and liver toxicity from the ; 

moderate concern for toxicity 

*CEB HEALTH: Exposures to humans: inhalation, dermal, ingestion, and drinking water; 

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are: 

fish 96-h LC50 = 2.1 P 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = 0.210 P 

green algal 96-h EC50 = 0.920 P 

fish chronic value = 0.200 P 

daphnid ChV = 0.200 P 

algal ChV = 0.360 P 

Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = ; ; solid with mp = 

77 EC (M); log Kow for the covalent ion pair = 1.7 (EPI); low Kow for the = 4.4 (ClogP), 4.5 

(EPI); S = 1.5 g/L at 20 EC (P); ph 7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L; 

high concern for toxicity 

assessment factor = 10.0 

concern concentration = 0.020 mg/L (ppm) 

*CEB ECOTOX: all releases to water with CC = 20 ppb 

SAT Co-chair: Vince Nabholz, 564.8909
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,046,807
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  426,389
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      21,507,385
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,353,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,169,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,950,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,169,083
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,165,845
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,585,288
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             195,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,207,212
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         16,207,212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,207,212
<EPS-BASIC>                                     439.97<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   439.97<F2>
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
<F2>EPS IS NET INCOME PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.1 


Amendment to the IPG Photonics Corporation 
2006 Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended 




4.5 Delegation of Authority 


The second paragraph of Section 4.5 of the Plan is amended by replacing it with the following:
The Committee may delegate authority to the Company's Chief Executive Officer to grant specified numbers of Awards (as determined by the Committee from time to time and during such time periods determined by the Committee) to existing or prospective Employees (other than those individuals who are subject to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act at the time of the grant) as the Chief Executive Officer determines appropriate without further action of the Committee but subject to rules and guidelines established by the Committee.
H. R. 4445 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To amend Public Law 95–232 to repeal a restriction on treating as Indian country 

certain lands held in trust for Indian pueblos in New Mexico. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian Pueblo Cultural Center 

Clarification Act’’. 

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION ON TREATING AS INDIAN COUNTRY 

CERTAIN LANDS HELD IN TRUST FOR INDIAN PUEBLOS IN 

NEW MEXICO. 

Public Law 95–232 is amended in the first section in subsection 

(b) by striking ‘‘However, such property shall not be ‘Indian country’ 

as defined in section 1151 of title 18, United States Code.’’. 

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON GAMING. 

Public Law 95–232 is amended in the first section by adding 

at the end the following: 

‘‘(e) PROHIBITION ON GAMING.—Gaming, as defined and regulated by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et 

seq.), shall be prohibited on land held in trust pursuant to subsection (b).’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|               |  |    |  |                                        
|-------------- |  | -- |  | ---------------------------------------
|               |  |    |  | Southwest Bank,                        
|               |  |    |  | Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|               |  |   
|August 7, 2015 |  | By |  | /S/ NANCY G. WILLIS                    
|               |  |    |  | Nancy G. Willis                        
|               |  |    |  | Vice President
SERVED: March 24, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JUSTIN LEIGHTON STAN LEY 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-1326 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin has transferred to the Food and Drug 

Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge Goodwin to 

Administrative Law Judge Douglas M. Rawald. Any dates set for hearing or prehearing 

conference are suspended until further notice. All other orders remain in full force and effect 

absent further order. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment-Service List 

/· 

.~ .. 

onnie A. Y 6Cler 

chief Administrate"' udge 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

ONE COPY 

Robert M. Helfend, Re.spondent 's Counsel 

Law Offices of Robert M. He1fend 

23838 Pacific Coast Highway 

No. 309 

Malibu, CA 90265 

TEL: 818-591-2809 

FAX: 310-456-3317 

Lierre Green, Complainant 's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7.6 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL:· 310-725-7117 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 15-1326 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 27, 2022.

# PLACE: 

                        Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's                               ( print page 3844)                            homepage (                        *www.ncua.gov*) and access the provided webcast link.                    

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

1. Board Briefing, Statutory Inflation Adjustment of Civil Monetary Penalties.

2. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Succession Planning.

3. Board Briefing, 2022 Supervisory Priorities.

4. Board Briefing, Central Liquidity Facility, Expiration of CARES and Consolidated Appropriations Acts Impact.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-01468 Filed 1-21-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00166

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

00166\00166_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00166\00166_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

00166\Certification Statement_00166.pdf Plant certification statement

x 00166\00166_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00166\00166_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

00166\00166_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40595 

Conference Calendar

__________________

GREGORY WILCOX,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CASIANO, Officer

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-92-CV-376

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 19, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gregory Wilcox has moved for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Wilcox must show that he will present

a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't,

811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). Wilcox's bare assertion that

his appeal involves an Eighth Amendment argument is insufficient

to identify a nonfrivolous appellate issue. Brinkmann v. Abner,

813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); see FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(6). 
No. 95-40595

-2-

His claim of ineffective counsel at his civil trial is frivolous. 

The Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does

not apply in civil litigation. Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785

F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). 

Wilcox's motion to appeal IFP is DENIED and the appeal,

which is frivolous, is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution

Wilcox that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on

his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Wilcox is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.
From: Glenn Wicks
To: Finamore, Robert (OST) ; Gretch, Paul (OST) ; Hedberg, Brian (OST)
Cc: ekagrimes@wicks-group.com ; Treskunov Yevgen ; "Antonyuk Denis" ; on@ukrembceo.com Subject: UIA Authority for Scheduled Service
Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:46:11 PM

Bob, Following our discussion today, I am confirming that UIA is looking to receive New York – Kiev authority, without intermediate or beyond rights at this time, as per the current designation.

I understand from Paul Gretch, that if UIA wishes to obtain intermediate or beyond authority as per the pre-existing bilateral agreement, it can do so by first proving an amended designation and then requesting additional authority from DOT at that time. I further understand that DOT does not object to granting authority stipulated in the pre-existing bilateral agreement, provided that it is stated explicitly in a designation note.

Many thanks and we look forward to receiving an Exemption and Order to Show Cause shortly.
Glenn

Glenn P. Wicks The Wicks Group, PLLC

733 10 th Street, NW, Suite 3002 Washington, DC 20001
Tel 202.457.7790
Fax 202.457.7799
Mob. 240.643.0504

gpwicks@wicks-group.com

This electronic message transmission contains information from this law firm which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately.
EX-4.16.1



 Exhibit 4.16.1 
  





 
  

					
		  		 	Level 7, 151 Macquarie Street
		  		 	Sydney
		  		 	NSW 2000
		  		 	Australia

 Ms Deanne Miller 
 General
Counsel & Company Secretary 
 1 June 2015 

Dear Deanne 
 Variation to Executive Employment Agreement
dated 13 October 2012 (“Agreement”) 
 Further to our recent discussions, Prima BioMed Limited (“Prima”) agrees to vary
your Agreement as set out in the attached Schedule. 
 This variation is effective from Monday 1 June 2015. Your new Remuneration will start being paid
to you from the next payroll run, with any back pay backdated to 1 June 2015 paid on this day as well. 
 All other terms and conditions of your
Agreement remain the same. 
 Please indicate your acceptance of this variation by signing (in duplicate) this letter and returning one executed copy to me.

 Prima looks forward to your ongoing assistance. 
  

	
	Yours faithfully,
	
	/s/ Lucy Turnbull AO
	 Lucy Turnbull AO
 Chairman

Prima BioMed Ltd


 I accept the variation to the Agreement 
  

	
	/s/ Deanne Miller
	Deanne Miller








 Schedule 

Agreed amendments to Agreement: 
  

			
	Clause	 	Agreed Amendment
		
	5(a)	 	Replace “$180,000” with “$200,000”