alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF PTEK HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1
to the Quarterly Report of PTEK Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Boland T.
Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Boland T. JonesBoland T. JonesChief Executive OfficerPTEK Holdings, Inc.December 19, 2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PTEK Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by PTEK Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0345 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-230-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 20130008

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4543 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4543

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, as the ``Anthony J. 
                    Cortese Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2010

Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, as the ``Anthony J. 
                    Cortese Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTHONY J. CORTESE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Anthony J. Cortese Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Anthony J. 
Cortese Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### People v Lovett,

No. 90991;

Court of Appeals No. 118422.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

KEVIN A. SCHULTE, :

Plaintiff, : 

 : Case No. 3:18-CV-135

vs District Judge Thomas M. Rose

 :

 

WITTENBERG UNIVERSITY, et al., :

 :

Defendant. 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY

The Court having been advised that on February 12, 2020, the above matter has been

settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided

that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if

settlement is not consummated.

Parties may submit a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated within

the sixty (60) day period. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the

settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673

(1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will

retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas M. Rose

Date: February 26, 2020 

Thomas M. Rose, Judge 

United States District Court
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 652 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding preconditions for the readmission of the Russian Federation into a reconstituted Group of Eight 

or participation in the Group of Seven. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2020 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. 

BOOKER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. CASEY, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, 

Mr. MARKEY, Mr. COONS, Mr. WYDEN, and Ms. HARRIS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding preconditions 

for the readmission of the Russian Federation into a 

reconstituted Group of Eight or participation in the 

Group of Seven. 

Whereas, since 2014, the Russian Federation has illegally occupied Crimea and Donbass, which was condemned in the 

Senate by passage of Senate Resolution 378 by unanimous consent in the 113th Congress; 

Whereas, in March 2014, the Group of Eight suspended the 

Russian Federation as a direct result of its actions in 

Ukraine and instead continued as the Group of Seven; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 652 IS 

Whereas, since 2014, the Russian Federation has also continued malign attacks on western democracies, including ongoing aggressive cyber and military provocations; and 

Whereas the Russian Federation has reportedly offered bounties to kill members of the United States Armed Forces 

deployed in Afghanistan: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that, as 

2 precondition for readmission into a reconstituted Group 

3 of Eight or participation in a Group of Seven proceeding, 

4 the Russian Federation must— 

5 (1) end its illegal occupation of Crimea and 

6 Donbass; 

7 (2) cease its malign activities against the 

8 United States and its allies; and 

9 (3) terminate any bounties against members of 

10 the United States Armed Forces. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

March 8, 2012

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta, Aeromexico, and Aerolitoral For Exemption and Statements of Authorization

Docket DOT-OST-2012-0036

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT Brett Kruger, DOT John Mietus, Counsel for Aeromexico and Aerolitoral
info@airlineinfo.com
Exhibit 10.2


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO THE


FOLLOWING PROMISSORY NOTE


PROMISSORY NOTE - BETWEEN GLOBAL NEWS
NETWORK AND PETER LAMBERT


 


Dated: March 17, 2015


 


This instrument executed
this 12th day of June, 2015 is the First Amendment to the above referenced Promissory:


 


1.           The
subject Promissory Note was to be paid on or about June 17, 2015 to Peter Lambert. However, investments funds did not arrive on
the planned date; therefore the parties agree that said promissory note shall be extended and will accrue interest at $55.55 per
day until this note is paid in full.


 


2.           In
all other respects, the Promissory Note is hereby confirmed and republished. Both parties have read, understand and agree to the
above referenced changes to the subject Promissory Note referenced.


 


EXECUTED at San Diego
County, California, on June 12, 2015.


 


	 	/s/  John Fleming
	 	GLOBAL NEWS NETWORK, INC.
	 	By: John Fleming, CEO
	 	 
	 	/s/ Peter Lambert
	 	PETER LAMBERT, Individually
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4500 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4500

 To rescind unobligated appropriations and repeal certain health care-
  related provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 
            2009 for purposes of reducing the national debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2010

 Mr. McCotter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on 
  Energy and Commerce and Science and Technology, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rescind unobligated appropriations and repeal certain health care-
  related provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 
            2009 for purposes of reducing the national debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom from Rationed Health Care 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RESCISSION AND REPEAL OF CERTAIN ARRA PROVISIONS.

    (a) Rescissions.--Effective on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, any unobligated balances available on such date of funds made 
available by division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 
of 2009 (Public Law 111-5) under the headings ``Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality'' under title XVIII of such division and ``Office 
of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology'' under 
such title, are rescinded and the provisions under such headings are 
repealed.
    (b) Repeal.--Section 804 and each of subtitles A through C of title 
XIII of division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 
2009 (Public Law 111-5) are repealed.
    (c) Use of Funds To Reduce National Debt.--The total amount 
rescinded by this section shall be deposited in the Federal Treasury to 
pay down the national debt.
                                 <all>
```
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS E ASTLAND , T EXAS J UDGMENT

Homero De Hoyos and * From the 104th District Court Lucia De Hoyos, of Taylor County, Trial Court No. 25237

- B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00247

- CV * August 31, 2016

Ryan Trowbridge, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for a

new trial. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Ryan Trowbridge

.
Exhibit 4 (0)

March 1, 2004

Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20549

**
Subject:  
General Electric Capital Services, Inc. Annual Report on      Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 -- File No. 0-14804
Dear Sirs:

Neither General Electric Capital Services, Inc. (the"Corporation") nor any of its subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument withrespect to its long-term debt that is not registered or filed with theCommission and under which the total amount of securities authorized exceeds 10%of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidatedbasis. In accordance with paragraph (b) (4) (iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K(17 CFR §229.601), the Corporation hereby agrees to furnish to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument which definesthe rights of holders of such long-term debt.

 

Very truly yours,

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.

 
By: 
/s/ James A. Parke   
James A. Parke      Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
 

**
Case 1:00-cr-00093-SAS Document 50 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Yacov Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ YACOV KAUFMAN
----------------------------------
Yacov Kaufman
Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2004



                                     - 18 -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, January 12, 2022; 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be conducted by remote means.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Closed to the Public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Briefing Matter.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Alberta E. Mills, Secretary, Division of the Secretariat, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (cell).

* The Commission unanimously determined by recorded vote to close the meeting and that agency business requires calling the meeting without seven calendar days advance public notice.

Dated: January 11, 2022.

Alberta E. Mills,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-00772 Filed 1-12-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wilson W. Cheung, certify that:

 

| ﻿ |                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.       | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A (the “Quarterly Report”) of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |

﻿

 

| ﻿ |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.       | Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report. |

﻿

 

 

| u                   |   |   |   |                                                                                        |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ﻿            |   |   |   |                                                                                        |
| Date: March 3, 2017 |   |   |   | /s/    Wilson W. Cheung         |
| ﻿            |   |   |   | Wilson W. Cheung                                                                            |
| ﻿            |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer and

Senior Vice President, Finance                                 |
| ﻿            |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                                                               |

﻿

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

United States of America 

 v. 2:18-cr-58 (2) 

 Judge Marbley 

Kwasi A. Oppong 

ORDER 

 There being no objections, the Court hereby adopts the Report 

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 115) that the 

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the 

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment, and he is 

hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The Court will defer the 

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the sentencing 

hearing. 

Date: April 8, 2019 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley 

 United States District Judge
#### People v Coleman,

No. 90993;

Court of Appeals No. 116095.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determin ed that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

1 See Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.

, 263 U.S . 413 (1923), and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman

, 460 U.S. 462 (1983). IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-10389 Summary Calendar

_____________________

ANTHONY LIONEL GIBSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BILL LONG, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CV-1384-H

_________________________________________________________________ September 14, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Anthony Lionel Gibson, Texas prisoner #695684, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint with

prejudice under 42 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous. We have reviewed

the record an d Gibson’s brief, and find no reversible error.

Although couched in terms of civil rights violations, Gibson’s

claim arises from his state court habeas proceedings. Under the

Rooker-Feldman 1 doctrine, he may not attemp t to invalidate his2

state court judgment in federal court. S ee Liedtke v. State Bar of

Texas
, 18 F.3d 315, 317 (5th cir. 1994). Furthermore, Gibson’s

challenge to a specific state habeas proceeding fails to raise a

constitutional question cognizable in federal habeas corpus

proceedin gs. See Nichols v. Scott

, 69 F.3d 1255, 1275 (5th Cir.

1995). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its

discretion by dismissing Gibson’s complaint as frivolous, and the

judgment is AFFIRMED. S ee Sojourner T v. Edwards

, 974 F.2d 27, 30

(5th Cir. 1992) (court may affirm judgment on any basis supported

by the record).

A F F I R M E D.
#### Henson *v.*Dodge.

Opinion delivered April 1, 1929.

Per Curiam :

The automobile was delivered to the defendant upon his giving the bond required by statute while the replevin suit for it was pending in the circuit court. The case was transferred, without objection, to the chancery court. The chancellor, upon application of the surety on the delivery bond of the defendant, transferred the custody of the property from the defendant to a third person. The chancery court did not exceed its jurisdiction, although it might be an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. Therefore the petition for a writ of prohibition will be denied.