alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

June 25, 2015

No. 10-14-00407-CR

MICHAEL EDWARD STRICKLAND

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 82nd District Court

Falls County, Texas

Trial Court No. 8033

**JUDGMENT**

	This appeal has been considered by the Court.  Because the Court finds that Michael Edward Strickland has failed in his duty to prosecute this appeal with diligence, it is the judgment of this Court that the appeal is dismissed.  

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK			

						By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
#### Cotton *v.*Boone County.

Opinion delivered May 14, 1928.

*James M. Shiim*and *Grump*& *Foster,*for appellant.

*Shouse*& *Rowland,*for appellee.

Humphreys, J.

Appellant 'brought suit in the Boone County Court for fees alleged to be due him for services rendered in his official capacity as chancery clerk and recorder of Boone County. He based his action upon fees allowed for such services (by statute prior to October 31, 1904.

Special act No. 63 of .the Acts of the General Assembly of 1903 placed the officers of Boone County on a salary. Said act went into effect October 31, 1904. It was alleged in the complaint that Said act was repealed by-act No. 77 of the acts of the General Assembly of 1927. The county court ruled that it did not, and disallowed appellant’s claim. On an appeal to and trial *de novo*in the circuit court off said county, the trial court found that act No. 63 of 1903 was not repealed by act No. 77, 1927, and dismissed appellant’s action, from which is this appeal.

The sole question presented by appeal is whether appellant, as clerk and recorder of said county, was on a salary after the approval of act No. 77 of 1927, on March 3 of that year. This depends on whether said act 77 of 1927 repealed act 63 of 1903, placing- the officers of Boone County on a salary.

In the title and the body of act 77 of 1927, in both 1 and 2, the declared intent was to repeal special acts relating to and fixing salaries of certain officers of Carroll *250County. No other purpose is mentioned in the body of the act, so the phrase ‘‘and for other purposes,” at the end of the title, is without meaning. If any meaning could be accorded the phrase, it would have to be a meaning in harmony with the declared purpose of the act and not a meaning foreign to such purpose. It being the declared intention in the body of the act to repeal all special acts relating to and fixing the salaries of certain officers of Carroll County, the necessary implication is that acts relating to and fixing- the salaries of certain officers in other counties were not intended to he repealed. Only two special acts relating to and fixing the salaries of officers in Carroll County were mentioned or referred to in the act. Of course they were repealed. The other four acts referred to by number and the date of their respective approval had nothing whatever to do with fixing the salaries of certain officers in Carroll County, so it is evident that those acts were inadvertently and unintentionally included in the statute. Obviously their inclusion was a clerical mistake or error. *Athletic Mining*& *Smelting Co.*v. Sharp, 135 Ark. 330, 205 S. W. 6951

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.5


AMENDMENT NO. 1
to Publisher Business Framework Agreement


This Amendment Number 1 (“Amendment”) to the Microsoft Advertising Publisher Business Framework Agreement dated August 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”) is entered into and effective as of August 1, 2015 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Microsoft Online, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Microsoft”) and Infospace LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Company”). 


Microsoft and Company, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, agree to amend the Agreement as set forth below as of the Amendment Effective Date. 
		
	1.
	Trademark License.  The URL for Microsoft’s trademark usage guidelines set forth in Section 3 (“Trademark License”) of the Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following URL:  http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/Trademarks/Usage/default.aspx. 




		
	2.
	Initial Term.  The definition of “Initial Term” in Table 2 of the Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following: 




	
		
	Initial Term
	47 months








		
	3.
	All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and are hereby ratified and confirmed.




		
	4.
	This Amendment may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, and all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. 






By signing below, the Parties agree to be bound by the terms of this Amendment:


	
		
	Company:  Infospace LLC




By (sign):    /s/ Peter Mansour  
Printed Name:  Peter Mansour   
Title:  President 
Date:        7/28/15
	Microsoft:  Microsoft Online, Inc.




By (sign): Cindy Bondoc 
Printed Name:  Cindy Bondoc
Title:  Contract Execution 
Date:  7/29/2015




  



Microsoft Confidential
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Initiatives Corporation
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Mark Clancy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      U.S. Energy Initiatives Corporation and will be retained by U.S. Energy
      Initiatives Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.




November
      14, 2006





/s/
                Mark Clancy
              ---------------------------
              Mark
                Clancy
              Chief
                Executive Officer
#### Roy Eugene VANCE *v.*STATE of Arkansas

621 S.W. 2d 224

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered September 21, 1981

*DeLoss McKnight,*for appellant.

*Steve Clark,*Atty. Gen., by: *Alice Ann Bums,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Roy Eugene Vance, by his attorney, has again filed for a rule on the clerk. In a Per Curiam opinion issued July 13, 1931, we denied a similar motion.

His attorney, DeLoss McKnight, has attached an affidavit admitting that the record was entered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 National Science Foundation
 In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting: NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: MRSEC—Columbia 2nd Year Virtual Site Visit (1203).
 DATE AND TIME: April 28, 2022; 9:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
 PLACE: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 | Virtual.
 TYPE OF MEETING: Part-Open.
 CONTACT PERSON: Dr. Cosima Boswell-Koller, Program Director, Division of Materials Research, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room W 9216, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-8800.
 PURPOSE OF MEETING: Virtual site visit to provide an evaluation of the progress of the projects at the host site for the Division of Materials Research at the National Science Foundation.
 AGENDA:
 April 28, 2022
9:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m
Brief Charge to Panel
CLOSED.10:00 a.m.-10:10 a.m
Introduction
OPEN.10:10 a.m.-10:55 a.m
Director's Overview
OPEN.10:55 a.m.-11:10 a.m
Discussion/Questions
OPEN.11:10 a.m.-11:30 a.m
IRG-1 Presentation
OPEN.11:30 a.m.-11:35 a.m
Discussion/Questions
OPEN.11:35 a.m.-11:45 a.m
Break
OPEN.11:45 a.m.-12:05 p.m
IRG-2 Presentation
OPEN.12:05 p.m.-12:10 p.m
Discussion/Questions
OPEN.12:10 p.m.-12:35 p.m
Education and Outreach, Diversity Plan
OPEN.12:35 p.m.-12:45 p.m
Discussion/Questions
OPEN.12:45 p.m.-01:30 p.m
Working Lunch
CLOSED.01:30 p.m.-02:30 p.m
Poster Session
OPEN.02:30 p.m.-02:45 p.m
Site Visit Discussion
OPEN.02:45 p.m.-03:30 p.m
Executive Session
CLOSED.03:30 p.m.-04:00 p.m
Debriefing
OPEN.04:00 p.m
Adjourn
 REASON FOR CLOSING: The work being reviewed during closed portions of the virtual site visit include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the project. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
 Dated: January 14, 2022. Crystal Robinson, Committee Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 2022-01093 Filed 1-20-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Workforce Information Advisory Council Meeting; Correction

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration, Labor, published a 
document in the Federal Register of December 16, 2021, regarding the 
February meeting of the Workforce Information Advisory Council (WIAC or 
Advisory Council). The meeting date has since changed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Rietzke, Chief, Division of 
National Programs, Tools, and Technical Assistance, Employment and 
Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C-4510, 200 
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20210; Telephone: 202-693-3912; 
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f78666e6c6f4b404301484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8addc3cbc9caeee5e6a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>. Mr. Rietzke is the WIAC Designated Federal 
Officer.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 16, 2021, in FR Doc #2021-
27189, on page 71525, in the third column, correct the Dates caption to 
read:

DATES: The meeting will take place February 3, 2022. Each meeting will 
begin at 12:00 p.m. EST and conclude at approximately 4:00 p.m. EST. 
Public statements and requests for special accommodations or to address 
the Advisory Council must be received by February 1, 2022, for the 
February 3, 2022, meeting.

Angela Hanks,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-01025 Filed 1-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Impurity and CAS Registry Number (a) Maximum percent

(b)Confidential CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI TS-K784YD ( CBI ) 

### Attachment 4 Page 1/1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

STEPHON R. SAUNDERS, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No.: 2:18-cv-451

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

Magistrate Judge Jolson

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 

Defendant. 

 

ORDER

This case is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation issued by the

Magistrate Judge on March 1, 2019, recommending that the Court overrule Plaintiff’s Statement

of Errors and Affirm the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision. (Doc. 14). The time for

filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed, and no objections have been

filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS AND AFFIRMS the

Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors is hereby OVERRULED and the

decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. 

The Clerk shall remove Document 14 from the Court’s pending motions list and enter

final judgment in this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION
STEPHANIE A. OFOE,
Plaintiff, Case No. 2:18-cy-232
v. CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
Magistrate Judge Chesley M. Vascura
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,
Defendant.

ORDER

On August 14, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 5) recommending dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1)
without prejudice for failing to timely effect service.

The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed in response to
the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and.
Recommendation. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Court hereby
orders the Clerk to DISMISS this action for failure to timely effect service, as required by Rule
4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4-10- Lo LTM

DATE EDMUNILA, SARGUS, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

MARK A. SCOTT, : Case No. 3:18-CV-171

:

Plaintiff, : Judge Thomas M. Rose

 :

v. : Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

: 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, :

:

Defendant. :

______________________________________________________________________________

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 18),

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 17), REVERSING THE 

COMMISSIONER’S NON-DISABILITY FINDING, REMANDING THE MATTER 

TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. §

405(g) FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION,

AND TERMINATING THIS CASE

______________________________________________________________________________

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 

18) filed by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) to Magistrate Judge Michael 

J. Newman’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 17). Magistrate Judge Newman 

recommended that the Administrative Law Judge’s non-disability finding be found unsupported 

by substantial evidence in the record and reversed. Magistrate Judge Newman further 

recommended that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 

U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report. The Commissioner filed 

Objections (Doc. 18) to the Report, in response to which Plaintiff Mark A. Scott filed a Response 

(Doc. 19). This matter is ripe for review.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court 

has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that the 
2

Commissioner’s Objections (Doc. 18) to the Report (Doc. 17) are not well-taken and are hereby 

OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS, in full, the Report (Doc. 17) and rules as follows:

1. The Administrative Law Judge’s non-disability finding is unsupported by 

substantial evidence and REVERSED;

2. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this Order and with

the Report; and 

3. This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Thursday, September 5, 2019. 

 s/Thomas M. Rose

________________________________

THOMAS M. ROSE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT PITT LODGE NO. 1,

Petitioner

v.

CITY OF PITTSBURGH,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 129 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Acorn Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Barth, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/Michael Barth        | 
|----------------------- | 
|Michael Barth           | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|May 14, 2013            |
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                        NAME UNDER
                                      WHICH SUBSIDIARY        JURISDICTION OF        PERCENTAGE
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                     DOES BUSINESS           INCORPORATION            OWNER            OWNED
<S>                               <C>                       <C>                  <C>                  <C>
Nordata, Inc.                          Eltrax                  California               Eltrax            100%
                                                                                    Systems, Inc.

Four Corners                           Eltrax                   Arizona                 Eltrax            100%
Technology, Inc.                                                                     Systems, Inc.

Encore Systems, Inc.                   Encore                   Georgia                 Eltrax            100%
                                                                                     Systems, Inc.

Global Systems, and                    GSSI                     Georgia                 Eltrax            100%
Support Inc.                                                                         Systems, Inc.

Five Star Systems, Inc.                Five Star                Georgia                 Eltrax            100%
                                                                                     Systems, Inc.
</TABLE>


Notes:   1.  Four Corners Technology, Inc. merged into Eltrax Systems, Inc. on
             December 31, 1998.

         2.  Subsidiaries acquired by the Company with the acquisition of Sulcus
             Hospitality Technologies, Corp. on March 25, 1999 are not listed
             as they were not subsidiaries of the Company at December 31, 1998.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

-vs- Case No. 3:18-CR· 

MICHAEL BOWMAN, 

Defendant. 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED 

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 31), ACCEPTING THE PLEA OF GUILTY, AND 

REFERRING THE CASE TO THE U.S. PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR A 

PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT 

This matter came on for a hearing on May 15, 2018, for a plea hearing. The matter was heard 

before United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington. Having conducted a full plea colloquy 

with the defendant, the Magistrate Judge concluded that the Defendant's plea of guilty to Count ls 

of the Superseding Information was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and thatthere is an adequate 

factual basis for a finding of guilt. 

The Court, noting that no objections have been filed thereto, and that the time for filing such 

objections expired on June 4, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. 

Therefore, based upon the aforesaid, and this Courts de novo review of the comprehensive 

findings by the United States Magistrate Judge this Court adopts the Report and Recommendations 

of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. 31) in its entirety, finding that the plea was knowing, 

intelligent and voluntary. The Defendant is FOUND guilty of the offense for which he pled. This 

matter is ORDERED referred to the Unites States Probation Department for a presentence 

investigation and report. Sentencing is scheduled for August 8, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. 

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this 5th d y 

T . ROSE, JUDGE 

ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

40
Exhibit 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, J. Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 12th day of October, 2010.








J. BRIAN NICHOLSJ. Brian NicholsChief Executive Officer