alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Michael E. Spicer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Orchid Bio-Sciences, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: November 13, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael E. Spicer                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | Michael E. Spicer                         
|                        |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,413,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      58,890,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,061,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     68,787,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,061,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,948,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,736,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,388,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,573,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,820,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,820,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (17.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (17.32)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

February 13, 2012

Docket Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0539

www.regulations.gov

Errata Sheet for the d-Phenothrin Summary Document (12/19/2011)

In the version of the d-phenothrin Summary Document which was posted in the public 

docket, the bullet beginning at the bottom of page 7 is missing several words of text. 

The corrected bullet is provided here with the missing text underlined. This 

typographical error will be corrected in the Final Workplan for d-phenothrin.

 The uncertainty factor (UF) for d-phenothrin for the RED was 1000X for adults (10X for 

inter-species extrapolation, 10X for intra-species variation, and 10X for database 

uncertainty factor for the inadequate toxicology database i.e., absence of acceptable 

neurotoxicity studies). Under FQPA, the Agency is required to apply a 10X safety factor 

(SF) to be protective of infants and children unless there are data to support a reduction 

or removal. However, EPA’s current position is that there is sufficient evidence to 

reduce the FQPA SF to 1X for adults and 3X for children <6 years of age. The 3X is based 

on age-dependent-pharmacokinetics and is further supported by physiologically-based 

pharmacokinetic (PK) model predictions of a 3-fold increase of pyrethroid concentration 

in juvenile target tissue compared to adults. A more complete description of the 

Agency’s reasoning behind a 3X FQPA SF for children can be found at 

www.regulations.gov; EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0746-0011. These UFs are subject to review 

and possible revision during the registration review.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  of Genta  Incorporated  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q  for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2006 (the  Report),
I,  Raymond P. Warrell,  Jr.,  M.D.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of  the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of  the  Securities
Exchange  Act of  1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,
the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:                                    | May
      9, 2006                          | 
|---------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | 
|                                         |                                            | 
|/s/
      RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR., M.D.* |                                           
|                                         |                                           
|Name:                                    | Raymond P.
      Warrell, Jr., M.D.        | 
|Title:                                   | Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer | 

* A signed
original  of this  written  statement  required by  Section 906 has been provided to
Genta  Incorporated  and will  be  retained  by  Genta  Incorporated  and  furnished  to
the  Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

45
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           OF GLOBIX CORPORATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual
report on Form 10-K/A (the "Form 10-K/A") for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2002 of Globix Corporation (the "Company").

      I, John D. McCarthy, the Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify that:

      (i)   the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d)); and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  April 11, 2003.




                                                       /s/ John D. McCarthy
                                                       ----------------------
                                                       Name: John D. McCarthy

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GLOBIX CORPORATION AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY GLOBIX CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION UPON REQUEST.
Case: 3:18-mj-00049-SLO Doc #: 3 Filed: 01/26/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:18-mj-00049-SLO Doc #: 3 Filed: 01/26/18 Page: 2 of 6 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:18-mj-00049-SLO Doc #: 3 Filed: 01/26/18 Page: 3 of 6 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:18-mj-00049-SLO Doc #: 3 Filed: 01/26/18 Page: 4 of 6 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 3:18-mj-00049-SLO Doc #: 3 Filed: 01/26/18 Page: 5 of 6 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 3:18-mj-00049-SLO Doc #: 3 Filed: 01/26/18 Page: 6 of 6 PAGEID #: 9
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the Annual Report of Interep National Radio Sales,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the Year ending December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ralph C.
Guild, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, that to my knowledge:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
             of the Company.

Date: April 1, 2003                    /s/ Ralph C. Guild
                                       Ralph C. Guild
                                       Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                       Officer


          A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the Annual Report of Interep National Radio Sales,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the Year ending December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William J.
McEntee, Jr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, that to my knowledge:

          3. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          4. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
             of the Company.


Date: April 1, 2003                   /s/ William J. McEntee, Jr.
                                      William J. McEntee, Jr.
                                      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                      Officer

          A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant t o 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 99-10659

GEORGE S. ROBERTSON

Plaintiff-Appellant

VERSUS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas

( 4:98-CV-981-BE )

July 12, 2001
Before GARWOOD, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam : *

Plaintiff-appellant George Robertson filed an interlocuotry

appeal of the district court’s March 3, 1999, “gag order”

restraining him from communica ting with the media about his case

against the United States. We construe the district court’s order

as having expired upon the final disposition of Robertson’s suit,2

and therefore as having no continuing e ffect on the parties.

Accordingly, we do not reach the merits of this issu e, which is

moot.

Robertson also appealed the d istrict court’s denial of his

motion for default judgment against the United States. However,

this court’s jurisdiction is generally limited to appeals of final

decisions of district courts. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000). And, as

t his claim is not “separable from, and collateral to, rights

asserted in the action, too important to be denied review and too

independent of the cause itself to require that appellate

consideration be deferred until the whole case is adjudicated,”

Adult Film As s’n of America, Inc. v. Thetford , 776 F.2d 113, 115

(5 th Cir. 1985), it is not susceptible to interlocutory review under

the collateral order doctrine. I d. We therefore lack jurisdiction

to consider Robertson’s appeal of the district court’s denial of

his motion for default judgment.

Accordingly, the “gag order” appeal is dismissed as moot, and

the motion for default judgment appeal is dismissed for lack of

appellate jurisdiction.

Appeals DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of Kensey Nash Corporation**

Kensey Nash Holding Corporation 

A Delaware Corporation 

Kensey Nash BVFTechnology LLC 

A Delaware Limited Liability Company 

Kensey Nash Closure Technology LLC 

A Delaware Limited Liability Company 

Kensey Nash CRD Technology LLC 

A DelawareLimited Liability Company 

Kensey Nash ECM Technology LLC 

A Delaware Limited Liability Company 

ILT Acquisition Sub, Inc. 

A Delaware Corporation 

KNC NER AcquisitionSub, Inc. 

d/b/a Kensey Nash Corporation—WI 

A Delaware Corporation 

KNC Investment Holdings, LLC 

A Delaware Limited Liability Company 

KNC NORAcquisition Sub, Inc. 

A Delaware Corporation
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

vs 

Tanya Boss 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 3:18CR5WHR 

ORDER TERMINATING PROBATION 

The above named commenced a term of probation on February 20, 2019, for a period of five years. 

Based on the recommendation of the U.S. Probation Officer and for good cause shown, it is hereby 

ordered that the defendant is discharged from probation and that the case be terminated. 

Dated this iP l'bday of ""~ .. :i Cl QJ 

Walter H. Rice 

United States District Court Judge
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Bobby Reeves, Jr., 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:18cv321 

About Space Self Storage, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendant. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on May 31, 2018 (Doc. 4). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including 

notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report 

and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 

1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the 

Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the 

Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2)(B). 

Any request for certificate of appealability or request to certify an appeal would not be 

taken in good faith and would be denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett 

United States District Judge
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

143) IV-C-109 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:59 AM Sheet 143 of 232 
\ . 

. . P.2 

* ft ri as " S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

% <f WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 

'

r

"i. «o^ & 

APR I 9 1988 

T H E ADMINISTRATOR 

Mr. Donald E. Peterson 

Chairman, Ford Motor Company 

The American Road 

P.O. Box 1899 

Dearborn, MI 48121 

Dear Mr. Peterson: 

I'm sure you are aware of the debate surrounding EPA's 

proposal to require that all new gasoline-powered vehicles 

install systems that capture vapors that currently escape into 

the atmosphere during refueling. One of the most controversial 

issues in the debate is the safety implications of these 

potential "onboard" vehicle systems. 

EPA has been aware of the safety issue for a long time and 

has attempted to study it in a straightforward, technical 

manner. At the time we announced the details of our onboard 

proposal (July 1987) , we made available to interested parties 

an EPA technical report on the safety of onboard systems. We 

requested comments on our analysis as well as additional 

information that would help us fully understand this safety 

issue. We have subseauently received many comments from motor 

vehicle manufacturers ;nd others during our public hearing in 

October 1987 and mor - cently in written comments submitted to 

the public docket. 

In light of the. romments we have underway a series of 

efforts. One of the >st successful has been a staff project 

to design and assemh; a prototype onboard system which would 

not increase the com;, x ity beyond that of fuel systems in use 

on today's cars and tr.<s. 

That effort is now complete. I have seen the prototype and 

was very impressed by its simplicity compared to current fuel 

evaporative control systems. Notably, the prototype system 

exclusively uses current production parts with very few 

modifications. Tests conducted on the prototype show that it 

consistently complies with the performance standard we have 

proposed for onboard systems. 
P.3 

AGENCyR°

reCT'0(V 

MAY 

ce/v/i 

- 9 1988 

***8?** 
^^^•^^B~ 

P.4 

- 2 -

My staff has been in contact with your staff to offer to 

meet and present our prototype hardware. We are very 

interested in Ford's comments on our work. In particular, I 

would like to encourage you and other senior Ford managers to 

carefully evaluate these new developments. 

Thank you for your consideration of this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

Eeeffio'Iboaaq' 

Lee M. Thomas
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT
CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, E. Leon Daniel, Chief Executive Officer, of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that:

(a)   the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2003 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related
interpretations; and

(b)   the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

* * *

|                        |                    |  | 
|----------------------- | ------------------ |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer |                    | 
|                       
|                       
|By:                     | /s/ E. Leon Daniel |  | 
|                        |                    |  | 
|                        | E. Leon Daniel     |  | 

November 5, 2003
Case 1:01-cv-00081-SSB-JS Document 51 Filed 09/22/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:01-cv-00081-SSB-JS Document 51 Filed 09/22/2003 Page 2 of 2
(

) 

Fax: (304) 926-0446

December 3, 2007 R E C E t V E t

DECEIVED

. The Honorable Donald S. Welsh “ DEC

Regional Administrator

U.S. EPA, Region III (3RAOO) DEC 1 4 200

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19 103-2029 jijaj çfl1)

Re: Confirmation of Specific Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(A)-(M) State Implementation

Plan Elements Under the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Dear Administrator Welsh:The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) herein confirms how certain

portions of the West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) satisfy specific ‘infrastructure”

elements for state SIPs required under sections 11 0(a)(2)(A)-(M) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for

the 1997 8-hour Ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). A related SIP revisionpertaining to the interstate transport elements required by CAA §11 0(a)(2)(D)(i) was the subject

of our October 17, 2007 proposed SIP revision submittal. The DEP also plans to submit a

separate general infrastructure PM2.5 SIP in the future.

The enclosure to this letter is a chart that identifies those infrastructure requirements that we

believe are already contained in the SIP and that are applicable to the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The

chart also identifies those infrastructure requirements that we believe are contained in SIP

revisions which have been submitted to, but not yet approved by, EPA. The attainment,maintenance and early action compact plans, as well as the regulations cited in the chart,

satisfied public notice and hearing requirements under 40 CFR §51 .102 and the West VirginiaState Administration Procedures Act prior to submittal to EPA.

The enclosed chart also identifies two infrastructure requirements which are not applicable to

West Virginia. Because West Virginia does not have a state board which approves permits orenforcement orders, CAA § 11 0(a)(2)(E)(ii) is not applicable to the West Virginia SIP. And,because the modeling and consequent determination regarding the attainment status of the

Eastern Panhandle counties relied on federal interstate transport programs rather than the local

measures contained in the approved Early Action Compact, West Virginia did not rely on localor regional entities for the reductions required for attainment. Therefore, CAA § 11 0(a)(2)(E)(iii)

is not applicable to the SIP.

Promoting a healthy environment.
Q

ty 

(304) 9

6

0462.

Sincerely,

-

Stephanie R. TimmermeyerCabinet Secretary

SRT/jlm

Enclosure

cc: Judith Katz (3APOO)

John A. Benedict, Director WVDAQ