alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Premiere
Technologies and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    15,673
<SECURITIES>                                               2,919
<RECEIVABLES>                                             57,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         111,588
<PP&E>                                                   121,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           750,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    200,497
<BONDS>                                                  172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     472
<OTHER-SE>                                               371,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   0
<SALES>                                                  112,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         112,809
<CGS>                                                     32,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            133,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             445
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         5,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (26,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (2,419)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (24,412)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (24,412)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.53)


</TABLE>
AFS-11-209-E September 28, 2012

Mr. Ray Heyde

President Aviation Training & Resource Center 2550 East Trinity Mills, Suite 126 Carrollton, TX 75006

Dear Mr. Heyde:

This is in response to your letter dated March 4, 2011, petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Aviation Training & Resource Center for an exemption from § 61.65(h)(4) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

Your reference to § 61.65(h)(4) concerns Flight Simulators and Flight Training Devices and not Aviation Training Devices. With your reque st specifically discussing Aviation Training Devices, we assume that you mean to seek relief § 61.65(i)(4).

Concerning your 1 st request to seek relief from § 61.65(i)(4), the FAA is currently reviewing the requirement for the use of a view limiting device in Aviation Training Devices and considering a change. Since there is the possibility for relief from this rule for all those using ATD’s, we will defer considerations for providing an exemption until that process is complete.

The FAA has reviewed your 2 nd request and finds that an exemption is not necessary. The FAA finds that Basic Aviation Training Devices (BATDs) and Advanced Aviation Training Devices (AATDs) are qualified and approved by the Administrator per § 61.4(c) in a manner described in Advisory Circular 61-136 and FAA Order 8900.1. In addition, BATD and AATD usage is approved by the Administrator for specific purposes in accordance with a FAA letter of approval (LOA) i ssued for each model of BATD and AATD.

An AATD LOA permits up to a maximum of 20 hours of the required aeronautical experience training per § 61.4(c) to be conducted in an AATD. However, an LOA for a BATD is limited

to a maximum of 10 hours.2

Therefore, the FAA will take no further action on your petition and Docket No. FAA-2011-0205 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
Case: 3:18-mj-00158-SLO Doc #: 5 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 30
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 1837

Unemployed

Number in thousands

25 to 29 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU03024932Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Unemployment Level - 25-29 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:08:21 PM)
EXHIBIT 99.2


                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Joule Inc.:

We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, the financial statements included in Joule Inc. and subsidiaries
annual report to shareholders incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, and
have issued our report thereon dated November 9, 2001. Our audit was made for
the purpose of forming an opinion on those statements taken as a whole. The
schedules listed in the index above are the responsibility of the Company's
management and are presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and
Exchange Commission's rules and are not part of the basic financial statements
and, in our opinion, fairly state in all material respects the financial data
required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole.


                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
November 9, 2001

The report is a copy of a previously issued report. Arthur Andersen LLP has not
reissued the report.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 223,824
<CASH>                                          39,069
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              26,012
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           4,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 343,248
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                116,801
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             30,249
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 32,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   343,248
<PREMIUMS>                                     159,533
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             11,091
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              10,213
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  33,635
<BENEFITS>                                     125,071
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     46,196
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            21,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,783
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  79,733
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            116,968
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                8,103
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              75,434
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                38,508
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 90,862
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          8,103
        

</TABLE>
|Exhibit 99.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







  In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
Paul S. Weiner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: November 12, 2002
                  |  | By: /s/ Paul S. Weiner
             
              Paul S. Weiner
              Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case: 1:18-cv-00302-SJD-KLL Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 08/07/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 92

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DISVISION
Brendon Schoonover, : Case No. 1:18 cv 00302
Plaintiff, : Judge Susan J. Dlott
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz
vs.
Sheriff Rogers, et al.
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Depose Third-Party
Witness Clinton Waters (ECF No. 38). For the reasons stated in the Motion, and for good cause
shown, Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Depose Third-Party Witness Clinton Waters is hereby
GRANTED. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B), the Court grants Defendants leave to

depose Mr. Waters at Toledo Correctional Institution on September 3, 5, 11 or 12, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8/1

KAREN L. LITKOVITZ
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE J

Date
#### C. A. BAWCOM *v.*ALLIS-CHALMERS CREDIT CORPORATION

74-12

508 S.W. 2d 741

Opinion delivered May 13, 1974

*W. H. Drew,*for appellant.

*David F. Gillison, Jr.,*for appellee.

FRANK Holt, Justice.

By conditional sales contracts, the appellant purchased certain farm equipment from appellee. Thereafter, appellee commenced a replevin action against appellant to repossess the equipment alleging delinquent payments on the unpaid balance. After giving notice of a proposed public sale to the highest bidder, appellee amended its complaint seeking a money judgment. After the auction, appellee filed a “Report of Sale” and prayed for a deficiency judgment. Appellant rr\oved to strike the amended complaint and “Report of Sale” on the theory of election of remedies.

The lower court, with approval of appellant and appellee, granted possession of the farm equipment replevied but dismissed appellee’s “Amendment to Complaint and Report of Sale” because of “improper joinder in an action of replevin.” Subsequently, appellee brought the present action for a deficiency judgment as asserted in the previous replevin action. Appellant answered claiming damages for malicious *570prosecution and asserting non-compliance with our Uniform Commercial Code; i.e., Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 85-9-501-507 (Add. 1961). Appellant moved for summary judgment on the theory that the former action was res judicata and appellee had elected to replevy and was, therefore, limited to that remedy. Appellee answered with responsive pleadings. The denial of appellant’s motion for summary judgment was then appealed without further determination of the cause.

We do not reach the merits of appellant’s contentions. The denial of appellant’s motion for summary judgment, being merely interlocutory, is not a final order and, therefore, is not reviewable on appeal. *Widmer*v. *Ft. Smith Veh. & Mach. Co.,*244 Ark. 971, 429 S.W. 2d 63 (1968). See also *Life and Casualty Insurance Co. of Tenn.*v. *Gilkey,*255 Ark. 1060, 505 S.W. 2d 200 (1974); *Ross*v. *McDaniel,*252 Ark. 253, 478 S.W. 2d 430 (1972); and *Deposit Guaranty*v. *River Valley,*247 Ark. 226, 444 S.W. 2d 880 (1969).

Appeal dismissed.
SCOTT D. DALESANDRO and DIANE 

NOONAN, on behalf of themselves and 

others, 

Date: 

Plaintiffs, 

aced and Agreed : 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

Michael A. Roberts (OH Bar No. 0047129) 

Graydon Head & Ritchey, LLP 

1900 5th 3rd Center 

511 Walnut Street 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

(513) 6290799 

(513) 6503836 

email: mroberts@gKqy&n. c o m 

vs. 

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, : 

Defendant. 

The Court is informed that the parties have stipulated to an extension of time, from 

September 9, 2003, to September 16, 2003, for the defendant to file memoranda opposing 

plaintiffs' attorneys' fee application. In turn the plaintiffs' attorneys shall have an additional 

two weeks, to October 14, 2003, in which to file reply memoranda in support of their fee 

application. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case No. C-1-01109 

Judge Sandra S. Beckwith 

STIPULATED ORDER 

Honorable Sandra S. Beckwith 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 48 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 1 of 2
Trial Counsel For Defendant 

W. Carter Younger (VSB 01147) 

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

McGuireWoods LLP 

One James Center 

Richmond, VA 23219 

(804) 775-4363 

ounsel For Defendant 

Theresa L. Groh, Esq. 

John C. Murdock 

Murdock, GoldenIberg, Schneider & Gfoh, L.P .A. 

700 Walnut Street, Suite 400 

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202 

(513) 3418291 

(513) 3418294 

en-wilAgoMn-Isglaw.com 

Trial Counsel For Plaintiffs 

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 48 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard E. LundinRichard E. LundinChief Executive OfficerMay 1, 2006




21
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 10368 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:13

- cr - 00144

- SPC

- CM

- 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus CARLOS RODRIGO HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leyva

- Romero , a.k.a. Ca rlos Rodrigo

- Hernandez, a.k.a. Carlos Hernandez

- Rodrigo , a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leiva

- Romero,

Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United Stat es District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ ( September 18, 2015) Before JORDAN , JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 15-10368 Date Filed: 09/18/2015 Page: 1 of 22 The Office of the Federal Defender , appointed counsel in this direct criminal appeal for Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Hernandez and has filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that cou nsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Hernandez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 15-10368 Date Filed: 09/18/2015 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Member Conflict: 
Bioengineering, Cellular and Circuit Neuroscience. February 18, 2022, 
9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on January 19, 2022, FR Doc 2022-00897, 87 FR 2878.
    This meeting is being amended to change the meeting time from 9:00 
a.m.-1:00 p.m. to 12:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: January 19, 2022.
David W Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-01365 Filed 1-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 92 (Monday, May 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 27964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11310]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9812-8]

Draft Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System NPDES General 
Permit--New Hampshire; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a Notice of Availability of the draft Small 
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) National Pollutant 
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit for New Hampshire, 
published in the Federal Register on February 12, 2013. A 30 day 
extension to the original comment period was published in the Federal 
Register April 4, 2013 and the comment period is currently set to 
expire on May 15, 2013. This notice extends the comment period from May 
15, 2013 to August 15, 2013.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 15, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments by one of the following methods:
     Email: Tedder.Newton@epa.gov.
     Mail: Newton Tedder, US EPA--Region 1, 5 Post Office 
Square--Suite 100, Mail Code--OEP06-4, Boston, MA 02109-3912.
    No facsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information concerning the 
draft permit may be obtained between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 
p.m. Monday through Friday excluding legal holidays from: Newton 
Tedder, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Environmental Protection 
Agency, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109-3912; 
telephone: 617-918-1038; email: Tedder.Newton@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    This notice extends the public comment period established in the 
Federal Register issue of April 4, 2013 (78 FR 20316) (FRL-9799-1). In 
the February 12, 2013 issue of the Federal Register (78 FR 9908) (FRL-
13-006 and 9779-7), EPA announced the availability for public comment 
of its draft small MS4 NPDES general permit for New Hampshire. In 
response to comments received during the Public Hearing, EPA extended 
the original comment period by 30 days and published the extension of 
comment period in the Federal Register on April 4, 2013. Currently, the 
comment period is set to expire on May 15, 2013. This extension is in 
response to additional requests received from several commenters to 
extend the comment period. EPA is hereby extending the comment period, 
which was set to end on May 15, 2013, to August 15, 2013.

    Dated: May 2, 2013.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2013-11310 Filed 5-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```