alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I, Richard E. Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 6, 2008 

 

 

20
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Global
Perspective Portfolio L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 14, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 29,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard E. LundinRichard E. LundinChief Executive OfficerOctober 31, 2006




23
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50089 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
JAIME MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-94-CR-98-2

- - - - - - - - - - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

__________________ No. 95-50090 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
ARTURO CHAVEZ-AVILA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-94-CR-98-3

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 1995No. 95-50089 c/w 95-50090 -2-

* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In examining whether the guilty pleas entered by appellants Jaime Munoz, No. 95-50089, and Arturo Chavez-Avila, No. 95-50090, were voluntarily made in conformity with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, this court utilizes a two-question, harmless-error analysis: "(1) Did the sentencing court in fact vary from the procedures required by Rule 11, and (2) if so, did such variance affect substantial rights of the defendant?" United States v. Johnson , 1 F.3d 296, 298 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc). Appellants entered their guilty pleas with the understanding that they faced a minimum ten-year term of imprisonment and three years of supervised release and that the maximum term was life imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1(A). The court's understatement of the supervised release term by two years was a relatively small fraction of the maximum term of imprisonment (life) that they each faced, and it did not materially differ from the length of imprisonment actually imposed. The appellants showed no surprise and raised no objection to the term of supervised release in the presentence report. See United States v. Bachynsky , 934 F.2d 1349, 1360 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 951 (1991). Moreover, neither appellant asserts that the mistaken statement of the length of supervised release termNo. 95-50089 c/w 95-50090 -3- affected their decision to plead guilty. See United States v. Thomas , 13 F.3d 151, 152 (5th Cir. 1994). Appellants also challenge the fine imposed by the district court. The record of appellants' Rule 11 hearing establishes that appellants knowingly and voluntarily waived their statutory right to appeal their respective sentences. United States v. Melancon , 972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). We will hold appellants to the bargain to which they agreed. See United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 244 (1994). Accordingly, the conviction and sentence of appellants Munoz and Chavez-Avila are AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.
                                             Calculation of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                                      (Thousands of dollars)


                                                                          Years Ended December 31,
                                                  1994             1995             1996             1997             1998
<S>                                           <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>      
Earnings:
      Operating income                        $   9,232        $   7,182        $   7,869        $   9,052        $  15,038
      Fixed charges                               1,359            1,401            1,455            1,511            2,355
                                             -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings as adjusted                          $  10,591        $   8,583        $   9,324        $  10,563           17,393

Fixed Charges:
      Interest on debt                        $   3,379        $   3,494        $   4,049        $   3,888            7,608
      Amortization of debt issuance costs            94               55               73               89              924
      Imputed interest portion of rent            1,265            1,346            1,382            1,422            1,431
                                             -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges                           $   4,738        $   4,895        $   5,504        $   5,399            9,963

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            $   2.24         $   1.75         $   1.69         $   1.96         $   1.75
                                             ===============================================================================
</TABLE>
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 504 

Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 

Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2020 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack 

at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 

14, 2018. 

Whereas, on February 14, 2018, a mass shooting that took 

the lives of 17 teachers and students took place at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida; 

Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for 

the individuals who were affected by this tragedy; 

Whereas President Donald Trump stated, ‘‘no child, no 

teacher, should ever be in danger in an American school. 

No parent should ever have to fear for their sons and 

daughters when they kiss them goodbye in the morning.’’; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 504 ATS 

Whereas the Parkland community has shown strength, compassion, and unity in the past 2 years; and 

Whereas February 14, 2020, marks 2 years since the horrific 

attack: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors the memories of the victims of the 

3 senseless attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High 

4 School on February 14, 2018, and offers heartfelt 

5 condolences and deepest sympathies to the families, 

6 loved ones, and friends of the victims; 

7 (2) honors the survivors of the attack and 

8 pledges continued support for their recovery; 

9 (3) recognizes the strength and resilience of the 

10 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School community; 

11 and 

12 (4) expresses gratitude to the emergency med13 ical and health care professionals of the Parkland 

14 community for their efforts in responding to the at15 tack and caring for the victims and survivors. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7795

CLAUDE GENE SLOAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-965) Submitted: June 30, 2004 Decided: July 29, 2004 Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Claude Gene Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Claude Gene Sloan seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sloan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case: 3:18-cv-00142-WHR Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 05/01/18 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: 17

Case: 3:18-cv-00142-WHR Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 05/01/18 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: 18
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF PTEK HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of PTEK Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Michael E. Havener, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Michael E. HavenerMichael E. HavenerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerPTEK Holdings, Inc.May 10, 2004
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 21.01


Listed below are subsidiaries of the registrant, all of which are wholly owned,
as of March 30, 2001:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     Jurisdiction of
                                                    Subsidiary                        Incorporation
            ----------------------------------------------------------------         ----------------
<S>                                                                                  <C>
            Application Methods, Inc. (d/b/a e-Sell Commerce Systems)                   Colorado
            IdealDial Corporation, (f/k/a Rocky Mountain Broadband, Inc.)               Colorado
            RMI-INI, Inc. (d/b/a Internet Now!)                                         Colorado
            Rocky Mountain Internet Subsidiary (Colorado), Inc.                         Colorado
            Infohiway, Inc.                                                             Colorado
            Internet Communications, Inc.                                               Colorado
            The Information Exchange, L.L.C.                                            Colorado
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Global Perspective Portfolio L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      17,450,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,832<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,269,103<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,269,103<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,320<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               507,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (432,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (432,411)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (432,411)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include due from DWR of $128,548 and interest
receivable of $56,284.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $633,773.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $207,266, accrued
management fees of $45,637 and accrued administrative expenses of $14,111.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $1,094,288, net
change in unrealized of $(1,177,208) and interest income of $158,240.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Case: 1:18-cr-00025-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:18-cr-00025-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page: 2 of 6 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 1:18-cr-00025-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page: 3 of 6 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 1:18-cr-00025-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page: 4 of 6 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 1:18-cr-00025-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page: 5 of 6 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 1:18-cr-00025-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page: 6 of 6 PAGEID #: 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,129,306
<SECURITIES>                                 1,723,443
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,299,657
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,186,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,960
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,239,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,186,609
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,346
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               346,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,493,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,493,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,493,344)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (67.08)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (67.08)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NOT LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>