alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Azuriah Hoskins, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:18cv305 

Hamilton County Juvenile 

Court, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendants. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on October 15, 2018 (Doc. 18). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including 

notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report 

and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 

1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 18) have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 18) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby 

ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Hamilton 

County Commissioners’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED IN PART. The claims 

against the Commissioners under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are DISMISSED but dismissal of the claims 

brought under Ohio law are DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge 

United States District Court
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

and
the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cost Plus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barry J. Feld, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Jane L. Baughman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Barry J. Feld                                                                                            
|Barry J. Feld Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)                            
|                                                                                                             
|April 6, 2010                                                                                                
|                                                                                                             
|/s/ Jane L. Baughman                                                                                         
|Jane L. Baughman Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
|                                                                                                             
|April 6, 2010
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 737 

Expressing support for the designation of September 30, 2020, as ‘‘National 

Veterans Suicide Prevention Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 2020 

Mr. KAINE (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. TESTER) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of September 30, 

2020, as ‘‘National Veterans Suicide Prevention Day’’. 

Whereas the wounds sustained through armed service to the 

United States are both visible and invisible; 

Whereas the wounds sustained through armed service to the 

United States may be invisible, but those wounds are 

treatable if the bearers of those wounds are connected to 

the right resources; 

Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense have determined that an average of 

nearly 20 current or former members of the Armed 

Forces die by suicide each day; 

Whereas veterans account for a disproportionate percentage 

of all adult suicides in the United States; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 737 ATS 

Whereas the surviving family members of veterans who succumb to the invisible wounds of armed service to the 

United States must not be forgotten and isolated but instead must be directed to available resources and support; 

Whereas, after the loss of a veteran family member to the invisible wounds of armed service to the United States, the 

family members of that veteran must not lose their link 

to the support and strength of the military and veteran 

communities; 

Whereas the families of veterans who die by suicide hold valuable ‘‘lessons learned on the lookback’’ that can be used 

to prevent future suicides in veteran populations; 

Whereas the voices of the surviving family members of veterans who die by suicide are useful and should be leveraged in prevention efforts; 

Whereas the need for formal recognition of the families of 

veterans who succumb to the invisible wounds of armed 

service to the United States is vital to the strength, 

health, and survival of the veteran community; 

Whereas those families should be recognized, supported, and 

heard on National Veterans Suicide Prevention Day and 

throughout the year; and 

Whereas September 30, 2020, is an appropriate day to designate as ‘‘National Veterans Suicide Prevention Day’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation 

2 of September 30, 2020, as ‘‘National Veterans Suicide 

3 Prevention Day’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ii Table of Contents

Section Page

1.0 Introduction

................................................................................. 1

2.0 Visibility Assessment Methodology

...................................................... . 6

2.1 Modeling Methodology ............................................................ 6

2.2 Meteorological Model.............................................................. 6

2.3 Dispersion Model.................................................................... 7

2.4 Modeled Post-Processing......................................................... 7

2.5 Modeled Sources................................................................... 8

2.6 Baseline Analysis................................................................... 8

Tables

2-1 Source Parameters............................................................

............... 8

2-2 Baseline Emission Rates................................................................... 8

2-3 Baseline Modeling Results................................................................ . 9

Figures

1-1 Facility Location Map........................................................................ 3

1-2 Facility Site Map.............................................................................. 4

1-3 Wilderness Areas with respect to FMC Granger Fa cility........................... 5

Appendix

A BART Visibility Impact Analysis – Electronic File s
EXHIBIT 23



Consent of Independent Accountants



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 33-58396, 33-67218, 33-58797 and 33-56721) of our report dated
January 24, 1997, on our audits of the financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. as
of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





                              Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.





Richmond, Virginia
February 6, 1997
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|               |  |  |  |    |  |                                                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  |    |  | Southwest Bank, Trustee
for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|               |  |  | 
|August 4, 2017 |  |  |  | By |  | /s/ NANCY G. WILLIS                                    
|               |  |  |  |    |  | Nancy G. Willis
Vice President
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

HENRY MORTELLARO VERSUS 

### OLD REPUBLIC UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE 

### SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, CHRISTOPHER CAMPEAUX, ANYTIME HOTSHOT, 

### L.L.C. AND 

### ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY NO. 

### 2022 CW 0139



## MAY 05, 2022

In Re: 

### Anytime Hotshot & 

## Delivery, LLC and Old Republic Union Insurance 

## Company, applying 

### for supervisory writs, 

### 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

### No. 700655.
BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, 

### JJ.

WRIT DENIED. The criteria set 

### forth 

### in Herlitz 

### Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors 

### of New Iberia, Inc., 

### 396 So.2d 878 ( La. 

### 1981) ( per curiam) are not met. JMG WRC Holdridge, J., concurs.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:   
May
12, 2009




/s/ RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR.,
      M.D.*Name:
              Raymond
      P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.Title:
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer




* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by Genta Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40496 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LETICIA MEDINA LEAL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CR-263-2

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Leticia Medina Leal appeals her guilty-plea conviction for using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). Leal argues that the factual basis is insufficient to support her guilty plea in light of this court’s decision in United States v. Tolliver , 116 F.3d 120 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 118 S. Ct. 324 (1997). This court’s decision in Tolliver did not change the law, it applied law that was established before Leal pleaded guilty, by the 1993 Supreme Court decision in Smith v. United States , 508 U.S. 223,No. 97-40496 -2- 237-38 (1993). The district court complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) and did not err in determining that Leal’s guilty plea had a sufficient factual basis. Leal knowingly carried a firearm to protect herself while transporting marijuana, thus, the firearm had a purpose with respect to the drug-trafficking crime, and its presence or involvement was not the result of an accident or coincidence. See United States v. Harlan , 130 F.3d 1152, 1153-54 (5th Cir. 1997) (holding that defendant who carried firearms in his car for protection in case one of his drug deals took a turn for the worse satisfied the “in relation to” requirement of § 924(c)(1)).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Velocity Express Corporation



|                                                                |  |  |  |                       
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------
|Direct or Indirect Subsidiaries of Velocity Express Corporation |  |  |  | State of Incorporation
|Corporate Express Distribution Services, Inc.                   |  |  |  | Michigan              
|Velocity Express Leasing, Inc.                                  |  |  |  | Delaware              
|Velocity Express, Inc.                                          |  |  |  | Delaware              
|VXP Leasing Mid-West, Inc.                                      |  |  |  | Delaware              
|VXP Mid-West, Inc.                                              |  |  |  | Delaware              
|VXP Leasing Mid-West, Inc.                                      |  |  |  | Delaware              
|USDS Canada LTD                                                 |  |  |  | Canada                
|Velocity Express Canada LTD                                     |  |  |  | Canada                
|CD&L, Inc.                                                      |  |  |  | Delaware              
|Clayton/National Courier Systems, Inc.                          |  |  |  | Missouri              
|Click Messenger Service, Inc.                                   |  |  |  | New Jersey            
|KBD Services, Inc.                                              |  |  |  | North Carolina        
|Olympic Courier Systems, Inc.                                   |  |  |  | New York              
|Securities Courier Corporation                                  |  |  |  | New York              
|Silver Star Express, Inc.                                       |  |  |  | Florida               
|CD&L Air Freight, Inc.                                          |  |  |  | New Jersey
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

 

I, Richard E. Lundin, as Chief Executive Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 1, 2005
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Dr. Kevin A. Schulte, Ph.D., : Case No. 3:18-cv-135

:

Plaintiff, : Judge Thomas M. Rose

 :

v. :

: 

Wittenberg University, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR MEDIATION (DOC. 50) 

AND REFERRING CASE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

MICHAEL J. NEWMAN SOLELY FOR MEDIATION

______________________________________________________________________________

The Court GRANTS the “Parties’ Joint Motion for Mediation” (Doc. 50). Pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C), and § 636(b)(3), the above-captioned action is hereby referred 

to United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman solely for the purpose of conducting a 

mediation. The Magistrate Judge shall have full authority to conduct the mediation and shall report 

to the Court whether or not it has resulted in settlement of this case. 

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Wednesday, January 29, 2020. 

s/Thomas M. Rose

________________________________

THOMAS M. ROSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION (COLUMBUS)

D.S., et al. )

Plaintiffs, )

v. ) Case No. 2:18-cv-00416-ALM-KAJ

Sequel Pomegranate Health Systems, LLC ) Judge Marbley

Defendant. ) Magistrate Jolson

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE OR PLEAD

The Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 

6.1(a), hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Defendant to move or otherwise plead in 

response to the Complaint. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on April 30, 2018. (Doc. #1). Defendant 

filed its Waiver of the Service of Summons on May 4, 2018. (Doc. #8). 

The Parties stipulate and agree to calculate the deadline for Defendant to move or otherwise

plead in response to the Complaint from April 30, 2018, the date when the Wavier of the Service 

of Summons was sent by Plaintiffs. 

The Parties also stipulate and agree that Defendant shall have an extension of time, in the 

amount of fourteen (14) days, in which to move or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint. 

Pursuant to this extension, Defendant must file its responsive pleading or motion by or on July 14, 

2018. 

The Parties have not entered into any prior stipulated extensions of time. The stipulated 

extension of time set forth above does not exceed twenty-one (21) days. 

Case: 2:18-cv-00416-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 10 Filed: 05/16/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 72
2

 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Erica Ann Probst (per email auth. 05/16/18)

_____________________________________

Erica Ann Probst (0073486) (Trial Attorney)

Kemp, Schaeffer & Rowe Co., L.P.A.

88 West Mound Street

Columbus, OH 43215

(614) 224-2678 (Telephone)

(614) 469-7170 (Facsimile)

Erica@ksrlegal.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs

/s/ Matthew L. Schrader 

_____________________________________

Matthew L. Schrader (0074230) (Trial 

Attorney)

Reminger Co., L.P.A.

200 Civic Center Drive, Suite 800

Columbus, OH 43215

(614) 232-2631 (Direct Dial)

(614) 232-2410 (Facsimile)

mschrader@reminger.com

Counsel for Defendant

Sequel Pomegranate Health Systems, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing was served using the Court’s CM/ECF 

system on May 16, 2018 and that notification of such filing will be made by the CM/ECF system 

on all counsel of record. 

/s/ Matthew L. Schrader 

Matthew L. Schrader (0074230)

Case: 2:18-cv-00416-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 10 Filed: 05/16/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 73
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Premier Exhibitions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended February 28, 2009 of our reports dated May 7, 2009 incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-148756; and Form S-8 Nos. 333-140477 and 333-138534) relating to the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of February 28, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year ended February 28, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the Company as of February 28, 2009.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
|Cherry, Bekaert & Holland            
|                                     
|Atlanta, Georgia                     
|May 7, 2009