Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Notices 3767 

Continuation of Suspension of 

Liquidation 

As a result of our Preliminary 

Determination and pursuant to sections 

703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, we 

instructed U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation 

of entries of subject merchandise as 

described in the scope of the 

investigation section entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after April 7, 2021, 

which is 90 days before the date of 

publication of the Preliminary 

Determination in the Federal Register. 

In accordance with section 703(d) of the 

Act, effective November 3, 2021, we 

instructed CBP to discontinue the 

suspension of liquidation of all entries 

of subject merchandise, but to continue 

the suspension of liquidation of all 

entries of subject merchandise between 

April 7, 2021 and November 2, 2021. 

If the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (ITC) issues a final 

affirmative injury determination, we 

will issue a countervailing duty order, 

reinstate the suspension of liquidation 

under section 706(a) of the Act, and 

require a cash deposit of estimated 

countervailing duties for entries of 

subject merchandise in the amounts 

indicated above, in accordance with 

section 706(a) of the Act. If the ITC 

determines that material injury, or 

threat of material injury, does not exist, 

this proceeding will be terminated, and 

all estimated duties deposited or 

securities posted as a result of the 

suspension of liquidation will be 

refunded or canceled. 

ITC Notification 

In accordance with section 705(d) of 

the Act, Commerce will notify the ITC 

of its final affirmative determination 

that countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

granular PTFE resin from India. As 

Commerce’s final determination is 

affirmative, in accordance with section 

705(b) of the Act, the ITC will 

determine, within 45 days, whether the 

domestic industry in the United States 

is materially injured or threatened with 

material injury. In addition, we are 

making available to the ITC all nonprivileged and nonproprietary 

information related to this investigation. 

We will allow the ITC access to all 

privileged and business proprietary 

information in our files, provided the 

ITC confirms that it will not disclose 

such information, either publicly or 

under an administrative protective order 

(APO), without the written consent of 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Notification Regarding APO 

In the event that the ITC issues a final 

negative injury determination, this 

notice will serve as the only reminder 

to parties subject to an APO of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This determination is issued and 

published pursuant to sections 705(d) 

and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.210(c). 

Dated: January 18, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation 

The product covered by this investigation 

is granular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) 

resin. Granular PTFE resin is covered by the 

scope of this investigation whether filled or 

unfilled, whether or not modified, and 

whether or not containing co-polymer, 

additives, pigments, or other materials. Also 

included is PTFE wet raw polymer. The 

chemical formula for granular PTFE resin is 

C2F4, and the Chemical Abstracts Service 

(CAS) Registry number is 9002–84–0. 

Subject merchandise includes material 

matching the above description that has been 

finished, packaged, or otherwise processed in 

a third country, including by filling, 

modifying, compounding, packaging with 

another product, or performing any other 

finishing, packaging, or processing that 

would not otherwise remove the 

merchandise from the scope of the 

investigation if performed in the country of 

manufacture of the granular PTFE resin. 

The product covered by this investigation 

does not include dispersion or coagulated 

dispersion (also known as fine powder) 

PTFE. 

PTFE further processed into micropowder, 

having particle size typically ranging from 1 

to 25 microns, and a melt-flow rate no less 

than 0.1 gram/10 minutes, is excluded from 

the scope of this investigation. 

Granular PTFE resin is classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States (HTSUS) under subheading 

3904.61.0010. Subject merchandise may also 

be classified under HTSUS subheading 

3904.69.5000. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings and CAS Number are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope is 

dispositive. 

Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

IV. Final Determination of Critical 

Circumstances 

V. Subsidies Valuation 

VI. Analysis of Programs 

VII. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether Production of Wind 

Energy Supplied by Inox Wind Limited 

Is Primarily Dedicated 

Comment 2: Whether the Mumbai 

Benchmark Is Comparable in Calculating 

State Industrial Development 

Corporation’s (SIDC’s) Provision of Land 

for Less Than Adequate Remuneration 

(LTAR) Benefits 

Comment 3: Whether the Mumbai 

Benchmark Is Aberrational in 

Calculating SIDC’s Provision of Land for 

LTAR Benefits 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Correct Its Land Benefit Calculations 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Adverse Facts Available to the 

Programs Under the State Government of 

Madhya Pradesh Industrial Promotion 

Act and the Merchandise Export from 

India Scheme Program 

Comment 6: Whether the Advanced 

Authorization Program and Duty 

Drawback Programs Are Countervailable 

Comment 7: Whether Renewable Energy 

Certificates Provide a Financial 

Contribution 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Correct Its Electricity Duty Exemption 

Calculations 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–01338 Filed 1–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–122–858] 

Certain Softwood Lumber Products 

From Canada: Notice of Amended 

Final Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) published a notice in the 

Federal Register of January 10, 2022, in 

which it issued the amended final 

results of the 2019 administrative 

review of the countervailing duty (CVD) 

order on certain softwood lumber 

products from Canada. This notice 

inadvertently omitted a company, Carter 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
3768 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2022 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

19730, 19740 (April 8, 2020). 

2See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Final Results of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 2019, 86 FR 68467, 68470 

(December 2, 2021) (Final Results). 

3See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Notice of Amended Final Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2019, 

87 FR 1114 (January 10, 2022) (Amended Final 

Results). 

1See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Petition on Behalf of Ventura Coastal LLC: Lemon 

Juice from Brazil and South Africa,’’ dated 

December 30, 2021 (Petitions). 

2See Commerce’s Letters, ‘‘Petitions for the 

Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of 

Lemon Juice from Brazil and South Africa: 

Supplemental Questions,’’ dated January 4, 2022 

(General Issues Questionnaire); ‘‘Petition for the 

Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of 

Lemon Juice from Brazil: Supplemental Questions,’’ 

dated January 4, 2022; ‘‘Petition for the Imposition 

of Antidumping Duties on Imports of Lemon Juice 

from South Africa: Supplemental Questions,’’ dated 

January 4, 2022; ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of 

Antidumping Duties on Imports of Lemon Juice 

from Brazil: Second Supplemental Questions,’’ 

dated January 11, 2022; and ‘‘Petition for the 

Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of 

Lemon Juice from South Africa: Supplemental 

Questions,’’ dated January 11, 2022. 

3See Petitioner’s Letters, ‘‘Lemon Juice from 

Brazil and South Africa: Petitioner’s Response to 

General Issues Questionnaire,’’ dated January 6, 

2022 (General Issues Supplement); ‘‘Lemon Juice 

from Brazil: Petitioner’s Response to General Issues 

Questionnaire,’’ dated January 6, 2022 and ‘‘Lemon 

Juice from Brazil: Petitioner’s Response to 

Supplemental Questionnaire (Q5),’’ dated January 

10, 2022 (collectively, First Brazil AD Supplement); 

‘‘Lemon Juice from Brazil: Petitioner’s Response to 

Second Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated 

January 13, 2022 (Second Brazil AD Supplement); 

‘‘Lemon Juice from Brazil {sic}: Petitioner’s 

Response to General Issues Questionnaire,’’ dated 

January 6, 2022 and ‘‘Lemon Juice from South 

Africa: Petitioner’s Response to Supplemental 

Questionnaire (Q11),’’ dated January 10, 2022 

(collectively, First South Africa AD Supplement); 

and ‘‘Lemon Juice from South Africa: Petitioner’s 

Response to Second Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ 

dated January 13, 2022 (Second South Africa AD 

Supplement). 

4See infra, section titled ‘‘Determination of 

Industry Support for the Petitions.’’ 

5See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(1). 

Forest Products Inc. (Carter), that was 

subject to the CVD review. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Hoffner, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3315. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of January 10, 

2022, in FR Doc. 2022–00212, on page 

1116 in the second column, Commerce 

did not list a company named ‘‘Carter 

Forest Products Inc.’’ 

Background 

On April 8, 2020, Commerce 

indicated in the Federal Register that 

Carter Forest Products Inc. (Carter) was 

a firm subject to the CVD administrative 

review on certain softwood lumber 

products from Canada covering the 

period of review (POR) of January 1, 

2019, through December 31, 2019.1 In 

the final results of the CVD 

administrative review covering the 2019 

POR, Commerce inadvertently omitted 

Carter from Appendix II as being among 

the firms subject to the review that 

received the non-selected subsidy rate 

that Commerce applied to those firms 

not individually-examined.2

Additionally, Commerce also omitted 

Carter in the appendix to the notice of 

Amended Final Results as being among 

the firms subject to the review that 

received the non-selected subsidy rate 

that Commerce applied to those firms 

not individually examined.3 With the 

issuance of this notice of correction, we 

confirm that Carter is included among 

the firms subject to the non-selected rate 

in CVD administrative review covering 

calendar year 2019. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended. 

Dated: January 19, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01361 Filed 1–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–858, A–791–827] 

Lemon Juice From Brazil and South 

Africa: Initiation of Less-Than-FairValue Investigations 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable January 19, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dakota Potts (Brazil) or Ariela Garvett 

(South Africa); AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0223 

and (202) 482–3609, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Petitions 

On December 30, 2021, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

received antidumping duty (AD) 

petitions concerning imports of lemon 

juice from Brazil and South Africa filed 

in proper form on behalf of Ventura 

Coastal, LLC (the petitioner), a domestic 

producer of lemon juice.1

On January 4 and 11, 2022, Commerce 

requested supplemental information 

pertaining to certain aspects of the 

Petitions in separate supplemental 

questionnaires.2 The petitioner filed 

responses to the supplemental 

questionnaires on January 6, 10, and 13, 

2022.3

In accordance with section 732(b) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act), the petitioner alleges that imports 

of lemon juice from Brazil and South 

Africa are being, or are likely to be, sold 

in the United States at less than fair 

value (LTFV) within the meaning of 

section 731 of the Act, and that imports 

of such products are materially injuring, 

or threatening material injury to, the 

lemon juice industry in the United 

States. Consistent with section 732(b)(1) 

of the Act, the Petitions are 

accompanied by information reasonably 

available to the petitioner supporting its 

allegations. 

Commerce finds that the petitioner 

filed the Petitions on behalf of the 

domestic industry, because the 

petitioner is an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. 

Commerce also finds that the petitioner 

demonstrated sufficient industry 

support for the initiation of the 

requested LTFV investigations.4

Periods of Investigation 

Because the Petitions were filed on 

December 30, 2021, the period of 

investigation (POI) for these LTFV 

investigations is October 1, 2020, 

through September 30, 2021, pursuant 

to 19 CFR 351.204(b)(1).5

Scope of the Investigations 

The product covered by these 

investigations is lemon juice from Brazil 

and South Africa. For a full description 

of the scope of these investigations, see 

the appendix to this notice. 

Comments on the Scope of the 

Investigations 

On January 4, 10, and 12, 2022, 

Commerce requested further 

information and clarification from the 

petitioner regarding the proposed scope, 

to ensure that the scope language in the 

Petitions is an accurate reflection of the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES