alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

MARK G. COWENS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cv-251

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 18) 

AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate 

Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 8, 2019, submitted a 

Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 18). No objections were filed. 

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 

of the filings in this case. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds that the 

Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. 

Accordingly: 

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) is ADOPTED; 

2. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for 

further proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. 
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 8/21/2019 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
February 3, 2015

Mr. Anton Ewing Video Solutions, LLC 2175 Cowley Way San Diego, CA 92110

Dear Mr. Ewing:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from part 21;§§ 45.23(b); 61.113(a) and (b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.103; 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) and (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request We entered your October 24, 2014, exemption request on behalf of Video Solutions, LLC into the public docket (No. FAA-2014-0880), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

What You Should Do If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Nia Daniels Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure§11.81 What information must I include in my petition for an exemption?
You must include the following information in your petition for an exemption and submit it to FAA as soon as you know you need an exemption.
(a) Your name and mailing address and, if you wis h, other contact information such as a fax number, telephone number, or e-mail address;
(b) The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from wh ich you seek an exemption;
(c) The extent of relief you seek, and the reason you seek the relief;
(d) The reasons why granting your request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole;
(e) The reasons why granting the exemption woul d not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek the exemption;
(f) A summary we can publish in the F EDERAL R EGISTER , stating:
(1) The rule from which you seek the exemption; and
(2) A brief description of the nat ure of the exemption you seek;
(g) Any additional information, views or arguments available to support your request; and
(h) If you want to exercise the privileges of y our exemption outside the United States, the reason why you need to do so. Pa g e 1 of 1 eCFR — Code of Federal Re g ulations

1/8/2014 htt p ://www.ecfr. g ov/c g i- b in/text-idx?SID=37c84 aa52464c40158b8e1c5e6c22ebc&am p ;no d

...
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2002 of Joule Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard G.
Clarkin, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Bernard G. Clarkin
-------------------------------
Bernard G. Clarkin,
Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary

December 26, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors
Verso Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (No. 333-35752, 333-45028) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92337, 333-80501,
333-85107 and 333-26015) of Verso Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated
February 23, 2001, except as to Note 5, which is as of March 26, 2001, relating
to the consolidated balance sheet of Verso Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2000 and
related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31,
2000 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Verso Technologies, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
October 8, 2001
#### People v Wismer,

No. 90325;

Court of Appeals No. 116742.
Exhibit 99.1

                  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1530, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            I, Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of
Genta Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

      1.    The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
            March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


            /s/ RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR., M.D.
            ------------------------------------
            Name:  Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.
            Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           28957
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 24105
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     234183
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           33348
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             34339
<LOANS>                                         405999
<ALLOWANCE>                                       5430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  762035
<DEPOSITS>                                      661913
<SHORT-TERM>                                     17407
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               9492
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       59923
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  762035
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  37784
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                13842
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  2017
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 53643
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               23946
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1077
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            28620
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      315
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (158)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  20582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  12178
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       12178
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9211
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.43
<LOANS-NON>                                       1925
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1548
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   881
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  5844
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     1043
<RECOVERIES>                                       314
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 5430
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              5430
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          62,741
<SECURITIES>                                24,418,757
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,608,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,443,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,608,842
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,454
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    90
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                112,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   112,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Johnny Lee TUBBS v. STATE of Arkansas

706 S.W.2d 180

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 24, 1986

*422
      *David H. McCormick,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Johnny Lee Tubbs, by his attorney, David H. McCormick, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. *See*Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. *See*per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; *Terry*v. *State,*272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2002 of Joule Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Emanuel N.
Logothetis, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Emanuel N. Logothetis
-------------------------
Emanuel N. Logothetis,
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

December 26, 2002
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN REID,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 24

- 00139

- CR

Appeal from the

346th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#20210D03074)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We

further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF JULY 2024.

JEFF ALLEY, C hief J ustice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
#### Davis v General Motors Corporation,

No. 90804;

Court of Appeals No. 132667.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4395 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4395

 To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
     include the Gettysburg Train Station, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

  Mr. Platts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
     include the Gettysburg Train Station, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GETTYSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK BOUNDARY REVISION.

    Section 1 of the Act titled ``An Act to revise the boundary of the 
Gettysburg National Military Park in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 
and for other purposes'', approved August 17, 1990 (16 U.S.C. 430g-4), 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Additional Land.--In addition to the land identified in 
subsections (a) and (b), the park shall also include the following:
            ``(1) Property commonly known as the Gettysburg Train 
        Station and its immediate surroundings, in the Borough of 
        Gettysburg as depicted on the map titled `Gettysburg National 
        Military Park, Proposed Boundary', numbered 305/80,045, and 
        dated September 2008, and
            ``(2) Property located along Plum Run in Cumberland 
        Township as depicted on the map titled `Gettysburg National 
        Military Park, Proposed Boundary Addition', numbered 305/
        80,046, and dated February 2009.''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF LAND.

    Section 2 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 430g-5) is amended by adding at 
the end of subsection (a) the following:
    ``The Secretary is also authorized to acquire publicly owned 
property within the area defined in section 1(d)(1) by purchase, from 
willing sellers only, if efforts to acquire that property without cost 
have been exhausted. The Secretary may not acquire property within the 
area defined in section 1(d) by eminent domain.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Taylor *v.*School District No. 45 of Searcy County.

4-8693

216 S. W. 2d 789

Opinion delivered January 17, 1949.

*435
      *N. J. Henley,*for appellant.

*W. F. Reeves,*for appellee.

George Eose Smith, J.

In 1889, G. G. Taylor, appellant’s grandfather, conveyed to School District No. 10 a small tract of land for its nse and benefit “so long as used for school purposes.” A schoolhouse was built on the property and was used by District No. 10 until the district was dissolved in 1943 and its territory annexed by appellee. In 1947, the appellant, concluding that appellee had abandoned the land, obtained deeds from other heirs of the original grantor and proceeded to remove the building and sell half the lumber. Appellee brought thi^ suit for an injunction, but the schoolhouse had been razed before trial. The chancellor ordered its restoration or payment of its value.

The effect of the deed was to vest a determinable fee in the district, which would terminate automatically and without the necessity of re-entry if the grantee abandoned its use of the property for school purposes. *Williams*v. *Kirby School Dist. No. 32,*207 Ark. 458, 181 S. W. 2d 488; Jewell, “The Distinction Between a Determinable Fee and a Fee Simple upon Condition Subsequent in Arkansas,” Univ. of Ark. L. S. Bull., May 1, 1946.

•The district’s proof of its use of the property from 1943 until 1947 is hardly persuasive. It attempted to show use of the building as a school bus stop during these years, relying on the fact that its contracts with the drivers required them to pick up children at Slicker— the local name for the old district. But the contracts do not uniformly refer to the school building as distin*436guished from the community. The reference seems to have been merely a convenient designation of the bus route. Several drivers testified that the pupils waited on the highway rather than in the building. Occasionally these children took shelter in the schoolhouse on rainy days, but this was on their own initiative and not at the school directors’ suggestion.

On the other hand, the evidence showing abandonment is convincingly supported by undisputed facts. After 1943, the appellee no longer insured the property. The building was allowed to fall into disrepair. All the window panes were broken, without replacement. A neighbor used the building for the storage of hay. Finally, four men who were school directors during this period testified that the district did not then claim title to the property or exercise any dominion over it. No incumbent during those years gave evidence to the contrary.

We are convinced that the district did abandon the property in 1943 and later attempted to change its position when two new directors took office in 1947. But since the reverter upon abandonment had already occurred, the appellee’s change of mind could not revest the title.

Reversed and dismissed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7193

BRUCE WINSTON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN HOL L AND; WARDEN MANSUKHANI , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:19

- hc

- 02008

- FL )

Submitted : December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Bruce Dwayne Winston, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Bruce Winston , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stat ed by the district court. Winston
v. Holland , No. 5:19

- hc

- 02008

- FL (E.D.N.C. July 15, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Friedhelm Blobel, Chief Executive Officer, of SciClone
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2009 |  | /s/    Friedhelm Blobel, Ph.D.
|                     |  | Friedhelm Blobel, Ph.D.       
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.