alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

               UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Gerald Couture, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Amendment  No. 1 to Form 10-K of RMS
TITANIC, Inc., the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I, along with the CEO, am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. I, along with the CEO, have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: August 4, 2004



/s/ Gerald  Couture
-------------------
Gerald Couture,
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.3



PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL


HAND DELIVERY


	
					
	To: Miroslaw ZIELINSKI
	Lausanne, June 30, 2015




                                           
Dear Miroslaw,


We are pleased to confirm your transfer, effective July 1, 2015, to the position of President Reduced-Risk Products, reporting to Mr. Andre Calantzopoulos, Chief Executive Officer PMI. 


Your grade and your annual base salary remain at their present level.


It is agreed and understood that this letter will for all purposes be regarded as a continuation of your employment with Philip Morris International Management SA.


All other conditions relating to your employment with Philip Morris International Management SA remain as stated in your employment contract and, if applicable, in any subsequent amendments.


Please confirm your agreement to this letter by signing the attached copy and returning it to HR Services Switzerland in Lausanne.


We would like to take this opportunity to wish you continued success and satisfaction.


Yours sincerely,


PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT SA


	
		
	/s/ PAUL HOGG


	/s/ RALF ZYSK

	Paul Hogg
	Ralf Zysk

	Director Human Resources 
Strategy & Planning
	Vice President Compensation & Benefits 
and International Assignments PMI










	
				
	Read and approved:
	/s/ MIROSLAW ZIELINSKI
	Date:
	Jul. 01. 2015

	 
	(Miroslaw Zielinski)
	 
	 






For distribution: R. Zysk
ref: ko



Philip Morris International Management SA, Avenue de Rhodanie 50, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland  
T:+41 (58) 242 00 00, F: +41 (58) 242 01 01
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WPI GROUP, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 29, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                          58,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,408,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,228,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,971,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,410,881
<PP&E>                                      17,675,706
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,823,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,746,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,578,839
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,116
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,316,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,746,928
<SALES>                                     45,097,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,097,272
<CGS>                                       26,636,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,636,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,904,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,686,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,869,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                   905,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,964,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,964,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

: Case No. 3:18cr15

Plaintiff,

: JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

vs.

:

DAVID LANDERS

:

Defendant.

ORDER DELAYING EXECUTION OF SENTENCE

For good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that the Defendant’s execution of sentence be 

delayed for sixty days. The United States Marshal is to seek a designation for on or after June 4, 

2020.

April 2, 2020 /s/ Walter H. Rice (tp – per Judge Rice authorization)

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of record 

United States Marshal
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

 

ZORAN CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karl Schneider, VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toZoran Corporation and will be retained by Zoran Corporation and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated: April  30, 2003 |                         |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------|
|                        |                         |
|                        | /s/  Karl Schneider          |
|                        | Karl  Schneider              |
|                        | Vice  President, Finance and |
|                        | Chief  Financial Officer     |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4869

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRADLEY LANIER CALDWELL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-04-188)
Submitted: January 31, 2006 Decided: March 6, 2006
Before WILKINSON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, Gregory Davis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bradley Lanier Caldwell appeals from the district court’sorder revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to twentyfour months’ imprisonment. Caldwell’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), representing that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Caldwell has been notified of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. We review the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a term of imprisonment for abuse of discretion. See, e.g. , United States v. Davis , 53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Cir. 1995). The conduct upon which the revocation was based included illegal drug use, a Grade B violation. SeeU.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 7B1.1(a)(2) (2004). Caldwell’s criminal history level was V. Combining these two factors, the district court correctly determined Caldwell’s sentencing range was eighteen to twenty-four months. See USSG § 7B1.4(a). The sentence imposed by the district court was within both the statutory and guideline range. Caldwell admitted to testing positive for cocaine on eight occasions as well as other supervised release violations. The district court gave Caldwell a choice of sentences and he selected the twenty-four month sentence because it included a drug treatment program. The sentence was- 3 - reasonable and the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing it. Pursuant to Anders , we have examined the entire record and find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Caldwell’s sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

JEREMY R. BRAUN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No.: 2:18-cv-399 

vs. JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH 

 Magistrate Judge Vascura 

ROGER WILSON, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 ORDER 

On May 29, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Report and 

Recommendation granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and on the intial 

screen, recommending dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims for failure to assert any claim over which 

this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. (See Order and Report and Recommendation, Doc. 4). 

The parties were advised of their right to object to the Order and Report and Recommendation 

and of the consequences of their failure to do so. The Court even granted Plaintiff’s request for 

an extension to file objections. (See Docs. 5, 6). There has nevertheless been no objection to 

the Order and Report and Recommendation. 

 The Order and Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims are hereby 

DISMISSED pursuant to Section 1915(e)(2) for failure to assert any claim over which this Court 

has subject matter jurisdiction. 

 
2 

The Clerk shall remove Document 4 from the Court’s pending motions list and terminate 

this case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22-0286

__________________________________________________________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DARRIN JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 9, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 12 2022

09/12/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0286
#### Hickinbotham *v.*City of Little Rock.

4885

305 S. W. 2d 844

Opinion delivered October 14, 1957.

[Rehearing denied November 11, 1957.]

*68
      *Kenneth Coffelt,*for appellant.

*0. D. Longstrelh, Jr.,*City Attorney, and *B. W. Laster,*Assistant City Attorney, for appellee.

Minor W. Millwee, Associate Justice.

This appeal by defendant is from another in a series of convictions for keeping his grocery store open on Sunday in violation of Ordinance No. 10,206 of the City of Little Rock. On the undisputed proof of such violation on the date in question the Circuit Court directed a verdict of guilty and the jury fixed the punishment at a fine of $25.00, the minimum under the ordinance.

Although somewhat weaker from defendant’s standpoint, the proof offered in defense of the charge was similar to that adduced in *Taylor*v. *City of Pine Bluff,*226 Ark. 309, 289 S. W. 2d 679, and *Hickinbotham*v. *State,*227 Ark. 1032, 303 S. W. 2d 565. In those cases, as here, the defendants contended they were being arbitrarily discriminated against in violation of their constitutional rights because certain business establishments other than grocery stores, which sold some items ordinarily carried in grocery stores, were permitted to remain open on Sunday. We held such testimony, or the mere fact that someone else had committed the same offense, insufficient to establish purposeful discrimination in the enforcement of the Sunday law. Those cases are controlling here and the judgment is affirmed.

Robinson, J., dissents.
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 2 of 16 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 3 of 16 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 4 of 16 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 5 of 16 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 6 of 16 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 7 of 16 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 8 of 16 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 9 of 16 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 10 of 16 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 11 of 16 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 12 of 16 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 13 of 16 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 14 of 16 PAGEID #: 14
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 15 of 16 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 1:18-cr-00043-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 16 of 16 PAGEID #: 16
#### People v Rios,

No. 90900;

Court of Appeals No. 114446.
Granted.8:49 AM, Feb 23, 2021

Case: 1:18-cv-00091-MWM-KLL Doc #: 74 Filed: 02/23/21 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: 449

Case: 1:18-cv-00091-MWM-KLL Doc #: 74 Filed: 02/23/21 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: 450

Case: 1:18-cv-00091-MWM-KLL Doc #: 74 Filed: 02/23/21 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: 451
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GNB Financial Services, Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wesley M. Weymers, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:   March 24, 2015 | By:    | /s/   Wesley M. Weymers                        |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Wesley   M. Weymers                            |
|                        |   | President &   Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**TYRONE JONES,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 13 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the**  Unpublished Memorandum and Order **of the Superior Court at No. 1771 EDA 2014 exited December 8, 2015,**  affirming **the Order of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas at No.**  **CP-51-CR-0612181-1973 exited May 21, 2014** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 18th day of April, 2016, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is** 

GRANTED **limited to the issue of whether Petitioner’s sentence v iolates the prohibition** 

**against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme** 

**Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012). As a result of** 

**the recent holding that Miller must be applied retro actively by the States, Montgomery v.** 

**Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016), the Superior Court ’s order is**  VACATED IN PART

**.**

**The case is** REMANDED **to the Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings**

**consistent with Montgomery. Allowance of appeal is** DENIED **in all other respects.**

**To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to am end the post-conviction** 

**petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending** **[13 EAL 2016] - 2**

**to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Sup reme Court of the United States** 

**which it deems to be retroactive. 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b )(1)(iii).** 

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideratio n or decision of this** 

**matter.**
### F w : R eques t f

o r e l ec tr on i c copy o f su m p da t

abase S tan l e y T ong to: N i c o l e Law 11 / 01 / 2011 05 : 32

AM F r o m: St

an l e y Tong /R 9

/USEPA/US To: Ni c o l e La w/R 9 /USEPA/US@EPA He r e i t i s , but not s u r

e how to r

ead i t....

----- Fo rw

a r ded b y St an l e y Tong /R 9

/USEPA/US on 11 /

01 / 2011 05 : 32

A M ----- F r o m: " Elli s on , B u rt " < B u rt.Elli s on @ c on s e r v a ti on
. c a
. go v> To: St

an l e y Tong /R 9

/USEPA/US@EPA C c: " H abe l, R ob" < R ob .H abe l@ c on s e r v a ti on
. c a
. go v> , " To l and , M i c hae l " < M i c hae l. To l and @ c on s e r v a ti on
. c a
. go v> , " S h i v e s , J enn if e r" < J enn if e r.S h i v e s @ c on s e r

v a ti on
. c a
. go v> D a t e: 10

/ 31 / 2011 03 : 40

PM S ub j e c t: RE: R eque s t f o r e l e c tr on i c c op y o f s u m p da t

aba se


### S t a n l ey, H e r e is a n e l e c t r o n ic c o py o f o u r Su m p d a t

a b as e
. P l e as e l et m e k n o

w if y o u h a v e qu e s t i o n s a b o u t t h e i n f o r m a t i o n. S i n c e r e l y, B u rt o n R

. Ellis on S e n i o r Oil a nd Gas E ng i n eer ( 661 ) 334

- 3674 ( 661 ) 861

- 0279 fax b e llis o n@ c o n sr v
. ca .g ov

F r om: T o ng
. S ta n l e y@ e p ama il. e p a .gov [m a il t o: T o ng
. S ta n l e y@ e p ama il. e p a .gov ] S e n t: Thu rsd ay , O c

t ob e r 27 , 2011 6:42 AM T o: E lliso n , B u rt C c: L aw
. N i c ol e @ e p ama il. e p a .gov S u b j e c t: F w

: Re q u e s t f

or e l e c t ro n i c c op y o f s u m p d ata b a se Re s end i ng - w r ong e m a il add r e ss

----- F or w arded b ySt an l e y T ong / R9 / U SEPA/ U S on 10 / 27 / 2011 06 : 40 AM
-----
F ro m : St an l e y T ong / R9 / U SEPA/ US T o : bur t on
. e lli s on @ c on s erv a t i on .c a
. gov C c: N i c o l e La w

/ R9 / U SEPA/ U S @ EPA Da t e : 10 / 27 / 2011 06 : 28 AM S ub j e ct: Reque st f or e l e ct ron i c c op y o f s u m p da t aba seB u r t,

T han k s f o rp r o vi d i ng a ll the i n f o r m at i on on s u m p s y e s te r da y
. Can y ou p r o vi de u s w i th an e l e c t r on i c c op y o f y ou r s u m p databa s e? T h i s w ill he l p u s bette runde rs tand the nu m be r , s i z e and l o c at i on s o f s u m p s i n the S an J oaqu i n V a ll e y Ai r D i s t r i c t, e s pe c i a ll y i n the K e r n Count y O il f i e l d a r ea. T han k y ou. S tan S tan l e y T ong U. S

. EPA Reg i on IX Ru l e s O ff i c e ( A IR
- 4) 75 Ha w tho r ne S t. S an Fr an c i sc o, C A 94105 415
- 947
- 4122
- v o i ce

415
- 947
- 3579
- f ax S u m p S ea r c h

. x l sx