alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Office of AIDS 
Research Advisory Council.
    The meeting will be open to the public via NIH Videocast. The URL 
link to this meeting is: https://videocast.nih.gov/watch=44363. 
Individuals who need special assistance or reasonable accommodations, 
should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the 
meeting.

    Name of Committee: Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council.
    Date: February 24, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: The fifty-ninth meeting of the Office of AIDS Research 
Advisory Council (OARAC) will include the OAR Director's Report; 
updates from the Clinical Guidelines Working Groups of OARAC; 
updates from NIH HIV-related advisory councils; presentation and 
discussions on HIV and COVID-19, and NIH-wide programs and 
initiatives; and public comment.
    Place: Office of AIDS Research, National Institutes of Health, 
5601 Fishers Lane, Room 2E61, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mary T. Glenshaw, Ph.D., M.P.H., Office of AIDS 
Research, Office of the Director, NIH, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 2E61, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-2958, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f4bbb5a6b5b7bd9a929bb49a9d9cda939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eaa5abb8aba9a3848c85aa848382c48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee within 15 days of the meeting by forwarding the statement 
to the Contact Person listed on this notice. The statement should 
include the name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the 
business or professional affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: www.oar.nih.gov, where an agenda and any additional 
information for the meeting will be posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research Loan 
Repayment Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.232, Loan Repayment Program for Research Generally; 93.39, 
Academic Research Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired 
Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan Repayment Program; 93.187, 
Undergraduate Scholarship Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged 
Backgrounds, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 11, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00781 Filed 1-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

PTEK HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PTEK
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Boland T. Jones, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and William E. Franklin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|
|
|
|



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PTEK Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by PTEK Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

I, Jerry C. Young, as Chief Financial Officer of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: July 29, 2008 

 

 

23
|Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION BY CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Joseph P. Caruso, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Palomar, and Paul S. Weiner, as Chief Financial Officer
of Palomar, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:




     1)       
          the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2)       
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Palomar.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|       |                                      
|------ | -------------------------------------
|By:    | /s/ Joseph P. Caruso                 
|Name:  | Joseph P. Caruso                     
|Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  | Date:   May 11, 2004                 

|       |                        
|------ | -----------------------
|By:    | /s/ Paul S. Weiner     
|Name:  | Paul S. Weiner         
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  | Date:   May 11, 2004   

|This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Palomar for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case: 3:18-mj-00327-MJN Doc #: 4 Filed: 04/23/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 23
p130753.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0753

Focus Ready Draft 8/12/2013

ENGINEER: Jay \ REC

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

 

Page 1
p130753.eng

 

 

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (08/02/2013):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox: Analogs: 

Migration to groundwater: Hyd Pdt negl

PBT rating: P3B1T1 PMN - P1B1T1; Hyd Pdt - P3B1T1.

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

Page 2
p130753.eng

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0753

 

 

Page 3
p130753.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0753

 

 

Page 4
p130753.eng

Page 5
p130753.eng

Page 6
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30,
2010 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Code Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Code Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to our knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/S/ JOHN R. MILLESON                      
|                                          
|John R. Milleson                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                                          
|/S/ KATHLEEN J. CHAPPELL                  
|                                          
|Kathleen J. Chappell                      
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                          
|Date: November 15, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTRY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                    3,487
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            12,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                              15,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         42,000
<PP&E>                                   57,648
<DEPRECIATION>                           44,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           57,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    14,025
<BONDS>                                     183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                              21,021
<COMMON>                                 28,761
<OTHER-SE>                               56,601
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             57,363
<SALES>                                 252,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        252,594
<CGS>                                   235,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           235,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,112
<INCOME-TAX>                                100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,012
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.09


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 7086

BILAL A. AL

- HAQQ, Michael Dion McFadden , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ASSOCIATE WARDEN JOSEPH CANNING, in his individual and official capacity; WARDEN EVONNE WILLINGHAM, in her individual and official capacity; ASSOCIATE WARDEN ELAINE FREEMAN, in her individual and official capacity; MAJOR JONATHAN WILLIAMS, in his individual and official capacity; CAPTAIN VALERIE THOMAS, in her individual and official c apacity; DHO DEDRIC WILLIAMS, in his individual and official capacity; SERGEANT MICHAEL HARRIS, in his individual and official capacity; IGC JENNIFER FRANKLIN, in her individual and official capacity , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Donald C. Coggins, Jr

. , District Judge. ( 2:20

- cv - 03233

- DCC )

Submitted : January 30, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2024

Before KING, AGEE , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7086 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 Bilal A. Al

- Haqq , Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes , Evan Michael Sobocinski , HOOD LAW FIRM, LLC , Charleston , South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7086 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:
Bilal A. Al

- Haqq seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge , denying his summary judgment motion, and granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ summary judgment motion filed in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal peri od under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court entered its order on September 1, 2022. Al

- Haqq filed the notice of appeal on October 13, 20 2 3. * Because Al

- Haqq failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date Al

- Haqq could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). USCA4 Appeal: 23-7086 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4508 Received in Senate (RDS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4508

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2010

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS 
              UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS 
              INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 111-89 (123 Stat. 2975), is 
amended by striking ``January 31, 2010'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``April 30, 2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 30, 2010.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 27, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 10


Exhibit 10.17.2




Form of

Second Amendment to the

Phantom Stock Appreciation Rights Plan

for

First National Bank of Nassau County

(formerly a holding of First Capital Holding Corporation,

now a subsidiary of Coastal Banking Company)







Upon mutual consent and for valuable consideration hereby recognized, The Phantom Stock Appreciation Rights Plan ("Phantom SAR Plan") is hereby amended. The language below is immediately effective upon execution.




Amendment




Whereas, the Bank wishes to freeze the Phantom SAR Plan and calculate each participants Accrued Benefit as of __________, 20__ based on the plan formula in Section 1.1 of the Phantom SAR Plan;




Whereas, this __________, 20__  calculated Accrued Benefit will earn no future interest;




Whereas, each participant's Measurement Period, Payout Period, and Beneficiary Designations will remain unchanged by this Amendment;




Whereas, in exchange for this concession, the Bank wishes to issue a new plan providing each participant with a number of non-qualified stock options;




Whereas, the Phantom SAR Plan can only be amended with the mutual written consent of the Participant and the Bank, even if the Participant is no longer employed by the Bank;




Whereas, all other provisions of the Phantom Stock Appreciation Rights Plan which are not specifically modified by this Amendment are hereby incorporated and shall remain in full force and effect.




Now Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, The Bank and Participant agree to this Second Amendment to the Phantom Stock Appreciation Rights Plan by signing below:




							
	 
	 
	Date

	 
	 
	 
	Plan Participant Signature and Date


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Plan Participant Printed Name


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Date

	 
	 
	 
	Bank Officer Signature and Date


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Bank Officer Printed Name and Title
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH )

INSTITUTE, et al., ) Case No. 1:18-cv-357

)

Plaintiffs, ) ORDER DENYING MOTIONS

) TO EXCLUDE 

)

v. )

)

LARRY HOUSEHOLDER, Speaker of )

the Ohio House of Representatives, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

_________________________________

Before: Moore, Circuit Judge; Black and Watson, District Judges.

Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’, Defendants’, and Intervenors’ various 

motions to exclude expert testimony and reports under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and 

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). (Mots., Docs. 148, 

150–156). 

The primary “gatekeeping” role of the district court is largely inapplicable when 

the matter is proceeding to a bench trial. See Deal v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Educ., 392 

F.3d 840, 852 (6th Cir. 2004) (“The ‘gatekeeper’ doctrine was designed to protect juries 

and is largely irrelevant in the context of a bench trial.”); see also United States v. 

Demjanjuk, 367 F.3d 623, 633 (6th Cir. 2004) (noting that the trial court’s discretion to 

admit or exclude expert testimony is “particularly broad” in the context of a bench trial); 

United States v. Brown, 415 F.3d 1257, 1269 (11th Cir. 2005) (“There is less need for the 
gatekeeper to keep the gate when the gatekeeper is keeping the gate only for himself [or 

herself].”); Gibbs v. Gibbs, 210 F.3d 491, 500 (5th Cir. 2000) (concluding that “[m]ost of 

the safeguards provided for in Daubert are not as essential in a case such as this where a 

district judge sits as the trier of fact in place of a jury.”). Moreover, after reviewing the 

parties’ various briefs on these motions, the Court finds that many of the arguments to 

exclude go to the credibility of the expert witnesses’ opinions, rather than to 

admissibility. The Court will be in a better position after trial to determine the merits of 

those credibility arguments. 

Accordingly, this Court prefers to “admit the evidence and then afford it whatever 

weight the Court deems appropriate.” See League of Women Voters of Mich. v. Benson,

No. 2:17-cv-14148, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6914, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 15, 2019) 

(quoting Mich. State A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Johnson, No. 16-CV-11844, 2018 WL 

1180886, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 7, 2018)). At this time, all motions to exclude are,

therefore, DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 2/6/19 /s/ Michael H. Watson

Michael H. Watson

United States District Judge

/s/ Karen Nelson Moore

Karen Nelson Moore

United States Circuit Judge

/s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge