alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This shedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
unaudited Financial Statements contained in Form 10QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            439,751
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      84,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       149,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  673,437
<PP&E>                                             24,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (15,362)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    932,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             449,171
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          102,729
<OTHER-SE>                                       (379,701)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      932,171
<SALES>                                         1,743,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,743,639
<CGS>                                           1,472,911
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     578,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  7,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (315,359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (315,359)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (315,359)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











We, each hereby certify to the best of our knowledge that the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of Gateway Tax Credit Fund III, Ltd. for the period ended December 31, 2010 containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway.








/s/ Ronald M. Diner

Ronald M. Diner

President

Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.

(the Managing General Partner)

February 11, 2011/s/ Toni S. Matthews

Toni S. Matthews

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.

(the Managing General Partner)

February 11, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4498 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4498

  To permit voters to vote for ``None of the Above'' in elections for 
 Federal office and to require an additional election if ``None of the 
                    Above'' receives the most votes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2010

 Mr. Hoekstra introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To permit voters to vote for ``None of the Above'' in elections for 
 Federal office and to require an additional election if ``None of the 
                    Above'' receives the most votes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal None of the Above Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF ``NONE OF THE ABOVE'' ON BALLOTS IN ELECTIONS FOR 
              FEDERAL OFFICE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in 
each election for Federal office there shall be included on the ballot 
a separate line, after the names of all candidates, as follows:

`` None of the Above........................................      []''.
    (b) Procedures.--Any voter may vote for ``None of the Above'' in 
the same manner as for a candidate. If ``None of the Above'' receives 
the most votes, a new election shall be held not less than 20 days and 
not more than 30 days after the results of the first election are 
certified.
                                 <all>
```
# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 23-7137 September Term, 2023 1: 23-mc -000 96-UNA Filed O n: Janu ary24 , 20 24 Len a Marie L indb erg,

App ellant
v . Bruce Lee Assa m, et al.,

App ellees

ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Hend erson , Childs, and Pa n, Circuit Ju dges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). Upon consid eratio n o f the foregoing, th e m otion to ado pt records, and the m otion to seal, it is ORDERED tha t th e m otion to ado pt re cords b e d enie d. App ellantha s no t dem onst rated tha t th e reco rds in h er ot her ca ses a re relevant t o th is app eal. It is FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e m otion to seal b e d enie d. App ellantha s no t overcome the stron g presum ption in favor of pu blic acce ss to judicial reco rds. S ee John son v . Grea ter Se . Cm ty. Hosp. Corp ., 9 51 F.2d 12 68, 12 77 (D.C. Cir. 1991 ). It is FURTHER ORDERED A ND ADJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s Oct obe r 3, 2 023 orde r den y ing w ithou t prejudice app ellant ’s pet ition for w rit of error coram no bis be af f irmed . T he district cou rt did noterr by conclud ing thatthe pe tition, w hich su gg este d tha t ap pellan t ha d b een de taine d b y stat e a uth orities in Florida a nd/ or Illinois, did n ot iden tif y an y relevant crim inal jud gmen t, a nd tha t, to the extent the pe tition sought to challen ge a co nviction resultin g fro m a crimin al jud gmen t en tered by a sta te co urt, t he court lacked jurisdiction . S ee United Sta tes v. Dene do, 55 6 U.S . 90 4, 9 13 (200 9) (ex plainin g that, to granta wri t of error coram no bis, a cou rt “mu st ha v e h ad statu tory

# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 23-7137 September Term, 2023 subje ct-ma tter ju risdiction o ver [th e] o rig inal jud gmen t of con v iction”). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

JOEL ESPINOZA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50381

D.C. No. 

3:16-cr-00664-LAB-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 13, 2017** 

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

Joel Espinoza appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

120-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), Espinoza’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for

FILED

JUL 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Espinoza has filed a

pro se supplemental brief. The United States has filed a motion to dismiss the

appeal. 

Espinoza has waived the right to appeal his sentence. Because the record

discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the

appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). 

 However, the judgment does not accurately reflect the statute of conviction. 

We remand to the district court with instructions to correct the judgment to reflect

that the conviction is for a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. See United States v.

Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to

correct the judgment).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED.

DISMISSED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

2
**EXHIBIT 15**

July 22, 2008 

Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee 

  for the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust: 

Re: Registration Statements No. 33-55784 and No. 333-91460 on Form S-8 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 21, 2008 related to our review ofinterim financial information. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registrationstatement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

KPMG LLP 

Fort Worth, Texas
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

.::1010_ I J-uro

FDMS DocketNo. FAA_ -~~~--

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date

ATA Mark Lopez 10/5/09

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master Ust to Vertfy That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
#### People v Washington,

No. 91047;

Court of Appeals No. 123724.
EXHIBIT 32



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
its knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|               |  |                                                                |  |                               
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|               | 
|               |  | Bank of America, N.A., Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|               |  |                                                               
|April 29, 2004 |  | By                                                             |  | /S/
NANCY G. WILLIS           
|               |  |                                                                |  | Nancy G. Willis Vice President
H. R. 4505 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To enable State homes to furnish nursing home care to parents any of whose 

children died while serving in the Armed Forces. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF STATE HOME CARE FOR PARENTS OF VETERANS WHO DIED WHILE SERVING IN ARMED FORCES. 

In administering section 51.210(d) of title 38, Code of Federal 

Regulations, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall permit a State 

home to provide services to, in addition to non-veterans described 

in such subsection, a non-veteran any of whose children died while 

serving in the Armed Forces. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 10.1


 


October 21, 2015


 


Ms. Luisa Ingargiola


MagneGas Corporation


150 Rainville Road


Tarpon Springs, FL 34689


 


		Re:	Memorandum of Understanding between MagneGas Corporation
and Green Gas Supply, LLC.



  


 


Dear Luisa:


 


This letter will confirm
that we have agreed to extend the date of expiration of the referenced Memorandum of Understanding to November 18, 2015.


 


Please sign and date in
the space indicated below to acknowledge our agreement to extend.


 


Very truly yours,


 


GREEN GAS SUPPLY, LLC.


 


By: /s/ Clinton Rafe
Dean                                         


       Clinton Rafe Dean


       Manager


 


 


ACKNOWLEDGED:


 


MAGNEGAS CORPORATION


 





	By:	/s/ Luisa Ingargiola	 	Date:	10/21/2015	 
	 	Luisa Ingargiola 	 	 	 	 
	 	Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32(B)




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Yacov Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



  /S/ YACOV KAUFMAN
Yacov Kaufman
Chief Financial Officer
November 16, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF PTEK HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1
to the Quarterly Report of PTEK Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned William E.
Franklin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William E. FranklinWilliam E. FranklinExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerPTEK Holdings, Inc.December 19, 2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PTEK Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by PTEK Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6099

ALLEN LEBEDUN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-1426) Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 18, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Lebedun, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Allen Lebedun appeals from a district court order dismissing without prejudice his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). The court dismissed Lebedun’s petition because he failed to pay the filing fee as directed. Because Lebedun may proceed with this action in the district court by complying with the court’s order, his appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).Accordingly, we deny Lebedun’s motion for relief from judgment, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Úřední věstník C 436/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 436 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 5824. prosince 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 436

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 5824. prosince 2015

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Evropský parlamentRada |
| 2015/C 436/01 | Prohlášení Evropského parlamentu a Rady k nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 ze dne 16. prosince 2015, kterým se mění Protokol č. 3 o statutu Soudního dvora Evropské unie | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropský parlamentRada

2015/C 436/01

Prohlášení Evropského parlamentu a Rady k nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 ze dne 16. prosince 2015, kterým se mění Protokol č. 3 o statutu Soudního dvora Evropské unie

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropský parlament Rada

| 24.12.2015 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2015

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 436/1

---

Prohlášení Evropského parlamentu a Rady k nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 ze dne 16. prosince 2015, kterým se mění Protokol č. 3 o statutu Soudního dvora Evropské unie (1)

(2015/C 436/01)

Po dokončení reformního procesu bude Tribunál tvořen dvěma soudci z každého členského státu. V zájmu dosažení rovnosti žen a mužů, která je podle článku 3 SEU jedním z cílů Evropské unie, by proto vlády členských států měly v rámci procesu nominace kandidátů na soudce Tribunálu podle článku 254 SFEU v co nejvyšší míře zajistit rovné zastoupení žen a mužů.

---

(1)  Úř. věst. L 341, 24.12.2015, s. 14.

---
##### 



STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
 NOTICE: THIS CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION PURSUANT  TO THE SOUTH CAROLINA UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT
 NONCOMPETITION,
SEVERANCE AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Between
CAROLINA FIRST BANK and MAURICE J. SPAGNOLETTI
  RECITALS
      AGREEMENT
  Employment
 Definitions




---



##### 



(A)
    
    any employee plan established by TSFG;(B)
    
    TSFG or any of its affiliates (as defined in Rule 12b-2
promulgated under the Exchange Act);(C)
    
    an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an
offering of such securities;(D)
    
    a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by stockholders of
TSFG in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of TSFG; or(E)
    
    except as provided in clause (iii) below, merger or
consolidation of TSFG with any other corporation which is duly approved by the
stockholders of TSFG; or
  2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



provided however provided, however
 4




---



##### 



Duties
 Term
 Termination
 The Company
      5




---



##### 



By Executive
      Compensation provided
 Annual Base Salary
 Annual Incentive Bonus
 Long Term Incentive Plan
 Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan
 Equity Compensation Awards
 6




---



##### 



Miscellaneous Benefits
 Signing Bonus
 Relocation
 Excess Parachute Payments
   7




---



##### 



1.
    
    give the Company any information reasonably requested by the Company
relating to such claim,2.
    
    take such action in connection with contesting such claim as the
Company shall reasonably request in writing from time to time, including, without
limitation, accepting legal representation with respect to such claim by an
attorney reasonably selected by the Company,3.
    
    cooperate with the Company in good faith in order effectively to
contest such claim; and4.
    
    permit the Company to participate in any proceedings relating to such
claim;
 provided however provided however provided further
   8




---



##### 



Confidentiality
 Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Agreement
   9




---



##### 



Assignment
    Notices
 To the Company:
    
    Carolina First Bank, c/o TSFG
104 South Main Street
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
Attn: Mary A. Jeffrey
 To Executive:
    
    At the most recent address for Executive on file at the Company.
  Provisions Severable/Savings Clause
 10




---



##### 



Remedies
   No Mitigation
 Waiver
 Amendments and Modifications
 Governing Law
 Withholding
 Compliance With Section 409A
 11




---



##### 



Enforceability of Confidentiality, Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Provisions
    th provided
 12




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 EXECUTIVE/s/ Maurice J. SpagnolettiMaurice J. SpagnolettiCAROLINA FIRST BANKBy:
    /s/ Mary A. Jeffrey 13