alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6604

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT LEROY NANCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior

District Judge. (CR-88-222, CA-97-385-3)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Leroy Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Michelle Lecocq, Michael

Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Leroy Nance appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Nance, Nos. CR-88-222; CA-97-385-3 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 26,

1998). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S.

June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We accordingly deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Strategic 
Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC, 
pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--RFA-CE-22-007: Reduce Health 
Disparities and Improve Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Related Outcomes 
Through the Implementation of CDC's Pediatric Mild TBI Guideline.
    Date: June 6-7, 2022.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Videoconference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Mikel Walters, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Official, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 
CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop F-63, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, 
Telephone (404) 639-0913, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f1bca6909d85948382b1929592df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c58892a4a9b1a0b7b685a6a1a6eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-00719 Filed 1-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Initiatives Corporation
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
      Clancy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      U.S. Energy Initiatives Corporation and will be retained by U.S. Energy
      Initiatives Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.




May
      21,
      2007





/s/
                Mark Clancy
              Mark
                Clancy
              Chief
                Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-40370

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Nancy Garcia Toscano, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:20-CR-1062-1

______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Plaintiff-Appellee Nancy Garcia Toscano appeals the sentence she 

received for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. 

Toscano asserts that the district court erred by imposing a condition of 

supervised release requiring mental health treatment because the condition 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 12, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-40370 Document: 00516748645 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2023
No. 22-40370

2

was not reasonably related to her history and characteristics. For the 

following reasons, we AFFIRM.

We usually review the imposition of a special condition of supervised 

release for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Gordon, 838 F.3d 597, 604 

(5th Cir. 2016). However, because Garcia Toscano failed to object to this 

condition during the district court proceedings, plain error review applies. 

See United States v. Huerta, 994 F.3d 711, 715 (5th Cir. 2021); United States v. 

Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391 (5th Cir. 2007). Garcia Toscano must show, inter 

alia, an error that is clear or obvious. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 

129, 135 (2009). 

Although the record contains no evidence that Garcia Toscano was 

diagnosed with or treated for a mental health issue, there was other evidence 

to give the district court a reason to believe she suffered from a mental health 

condition, see United States v. Alvarez, 880 F.3d 236, 240 (5th Cir. 2018). 

Moreover, there was evidence that reflected “a questionable mental health 

history.” United States v. Gordon, 838 F.3d 597, 604 (5th Cir. 2016). The 

cases Garcia Toscano cites are distinguishable on the facts. To the extent 

Garcia Toscano relies on the lack of a referral to treatment by the psychiatrist 

she saw while in custody, there are not enough facts in the record about her 

encounter with the psychiatrist to support a conclusion that her history did 

not reflect a need for treatment. For all these reasons, the imposition of a 

mental-health treatment condition was not clear or obvious error, if error at 

all. See Puckett, 556 U.S. at 135. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-40370 Document: 00516748645 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2023
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Centro NP LLC (the "Company"), each hereby
certifies that, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

/s/ MICHAEL CARROLL Michael Carroll Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2009/s/ JOHN BRADDON John Braddon Chief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2009


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Centro NP LLC and will be retained by Centro
NP LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 1 of 36  PAGEID #: 584

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 2 of 36  PAGEID #: 585

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 3 of 36  PAGEID #: 586

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 4 of 36  PAGEID #: 587

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 5 of 36  PAGEID #: 588

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 6 of 36  PAGEID #: 589

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 7 of 36  PAGEID #: 590

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 8 of 36  PAGEID #: 591

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 9 of 36  PAGEID #: 592

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 10 of 36  PAGEID #: 593

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 11 of 36  PAGEID #: 594

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 12 of 36  PAGEID #: 595

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 13 of 36  PAGEID #: 596

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 14 of 36  PAGEID #: 597

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 15 of 36  PAGEID #: 598

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 16 of 36  PAGEID #: 599

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 17 of 36  PAGEID #: 600

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 18 of 36  PAGEID #: 601

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 19 of 36  PAGEID #: 602

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 20 of 36  PAGEID #: 603

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 21 of 36  PAGEID #: 604

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 22 of 36  PAGEID #: 605

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 23 of 36  PAGEID #: 606

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 24 of 36  PAGEID #: 607

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 25 of 36  PAGEID #: 608

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 26 of 36  PAGEID #: 609

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 27 of 36  PAGEID #: 610

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 28 of 36  PAGEID #: 611

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 29 of 36  PAGEID #: 612

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 30 of 36  PAGEID #: 613

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 31 of 36  PAGEID #: 614

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 32 of 36  PAGEID #: 615

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 33 of 36  PAGEID #: 616

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 34 of 36  PAGEID #: 617

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 35 of 36  PAGEID #: 618

Case: 1:18-cv-00224-TSB Doc #: 17-2 Filed: 11/11/19 Page: 36 of 36  PAGEID #: 619
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:17-mj-00676-CMV Doc #: 15 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 49
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:17-mj-00676-CMV Doc #: 15 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 50
Abatement Order filed January 24, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 01052

- CV

____________ ESTATE OF FLOYD E. D IXON, DECEASED , Appellant

On Appeal from the Probate Court No

. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 377,211



### ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter’s record was filed in this appeal on December 18, 2012. Sarah J. Gaines, the official court reporter for Probate Court No. 4, has informed this court that her certification by the Court Reporters’ Certification Board lapsed effective January 1, 2011. Until such time as she can be reinstated by the Board, the court has appointed a successor official court reporter to act in her stead and certify, if necessary the reporter’s record in this cause. Accordingly, we issue the following order:

T he trial court is directed to conduct a hear ing to determine whether the parties can agree that the record filed on December 18, 2012 can be certified by thesuccessor official court reporter. The court is directed to reduce it s findings to

writing and to have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this court, together with a reporter’s record from the hearing,
within 30 days of the date of this order

. In the event the court determines t he record can be certified by the successor court reporter, such certification shall be
filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
active docket . The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court = s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, t he court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
44 Canal Cent er Pl aza

▪ Sui t e 310 ▪ Al exandr i a

, Vi r gi ni a 22314 ▪ Tel : (703) 684

- 0084 ▪ Fax : (703) 684

- 0427 VIA E

- MAIL

July 1, 2010

Mr. Jeffrey A. Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243

- 02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Mr. William Neuffer

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243

- 02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protecti on Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

RE: Submission of Existing Emissions Data

- FiberTEK Insulation, LLC

Dear Messrs. Telander and Neuffer:

The transmission of this data from the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

(“NAIMA”) to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is in fulfillment of FiberTEK

Insulation, LLC and NAIMA’s c ommitment to provide EPA existing emissions d ata identified in

NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 lett er to EPA.

NAIMA is submitting .pdf versions via E

- mail of exis ting emissions data for formaldehyde,

methanol, p h e nol , and particulate m atter from the Koogler & Associates report entitled

“ Emission Measurements of Formaldehyde, Methanol, Ph e nol

, Particula te Matter and Visible

Emissions. ” This data was collected at FiberTEK’s Lakeland, Florida facility

. FiberTEK’s

Nephi, Utah facility is not fully operational

, so no data is available.

FiberTEK has not designated any portion of this report as confidential business information

(“CBI”)

. With the other company submissions that you will receive from NAIMA, CBI will be

redacted from the copies sent to you, and the CBI will be marked as such and will be sent to:

Mr. Roberto Morales, Document Control Officer109 T.W. Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me or Chris Martin at (703) 6 84

- 0084

. We can also be contacted by e

- mail at arcane@naima.org or cmartin@naima.org

.

Sincerely,



## Angus E. Crane

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684

- 0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684

- 0427

Attachment
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00178

- CV

ALLEGHENY CASUALTY, DEFENDANT

- SURETY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT

---------- Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court = s March 1, 2010

“ Final Judgment

. ” The trial court subsequently granted appellant = s motion for

new trial on June 4, 2010 , while it still had plenary jurisdiction over the case. See

Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(e).

On June 9, 2010 , we informed the parties that it appeared the trial court = s
granting of the motion for new trial rendered this appeal moot

. We stated that the
appeal would be dismissed as moot unless, on or before June 21, 2010 , any

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for

continuing the appeal. Neither party filed a response.

Accordingly, on this court = s ow n motion, we dismiss the appeal as moot.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.

DELIVERED: July 8 , 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARATERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,711,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  918,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      34,234,667
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,311,973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,483,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,013,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,483,635
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,450,472
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               960,871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             420,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                269,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            269,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   269,259
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.31<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.31<F2>
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
<F2>EPS IS NET INCOME PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6787

BARRY ALBERT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (1:06-cv-00110-TSE-LO)

Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: June 13, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Albert, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Barry Albert seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Albert has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED