alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John J. Remaley, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Neffs Bancorp, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
     being prepared;

          (b) intentionally omitted;

          (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions
     about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
     the end of the period covered by this annual report based upon such
     evaluation; and

          (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.


Date: March 28, 2005                    By: /s/ John J. Remaley
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            President & CEO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Wednesday, January 26, 2022, 10:00-11:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held remotely.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Decisional Matter:

Final Rule: Safety Standard for Crib Mattresses

                    All attendees and participants should pre-register for the Commission meeting (Webinar). To pre-register for the Webinar, please visit                     *https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/​register/​9089674042451601677*                     and fill in the information. After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: January 19, 2022.

Alberta E. Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-01355 Filed 1-20-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 102 Filed: 08/23/21 Page: 1 of 3  PAGEID #: 3337

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 102 Filed: 08/23/21 Page: 2 of 3  PAGEID #: 3338

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 102 Filed: 08/23/21 Page: 3 of 3  PAGEID #: 3339
Case: 3:17-cv-00334-TMR Doc #: 14-17 Filed: 04/16/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 301
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

We hereby consent to
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-19652, 33-44103, 33-49724, 33-64323, 33-53542, 333-38166, 333-39584, 333-135194 and 333-137857) of Unit Corporation of the reference to our report for Unit
Corporation, which appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Unit Corporation.



/s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


Houston, Texas

February 23, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

STEPHANIE DE ANGELIS, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

v. ) Case No. 2:17 cv 985 

 ) 

CG CONSULTING, LLC, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff, STEPHANIE DE ANGELIS, and 

Defendants, CG CONSULTING, LLC, HOUSTON KP, LLC, ZIGOT, LLC, POLEKATZ 

GENTLEMEN’S CLUB, LLC, MARSHALL INTERNATIONAL, LLC, PERA ODISHOO, 

ANTHONY QUARANTA, STEPHEN DABROWSKI, and NICHOLAS CASTALDO, through 

their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice as to 

Plaintiff’s individual claims, and without prejudice as to the claims of the putative class members, 

with each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees, unless otherwise provided for. No notice to 

the putative class is required as no class has been certified in this action. 

So agreed to this 7th day of August, 2018. 

/s/ Steven C. Babin, Jr. 

Steven C. Babin, Jr. (0093584) 

Lance Chapin (0069473) 

Chapin Legal Group, LLC 

580 South High Street, Suite 330 

Columbus, Ohio 43215 

Telephone: 614.221.9100 

Facsimile: 614.221.9272 

steven.babin@chapinlegal.com 

lance.chapin@chapinlegal.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Stephanie De Angelis, et al. 

Case: 2:17-cv-00985-ALM-EPD Doc #: 62 Filed: 08/07/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 374
/s/ Sara S. Zorich ________________ 

Michelle L. Casper (0091321) 

Jeffrey A. Risch (Pro hac vice) 

Molly A. Arranz (Pro hac vice) 

Sara S. Zorich (Pro hac vice) 

SmithAmundsen, LLC 

150 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 3300 

Chicago, IL 60601 

312-894-3200 

312-894-3210 (fax) 

mcasper@salawus.com 

jrisch@salawus.com (Pro Hac Vice) 

marranz@salawus.com (Pro Hac Vice) 

szorich@salawus.com (Pro Hac Vice)

Counsel for Defendants CG Consulting, LLC, Houston KP, LLC, Zigot, LLC, Nicholas Castaldo, 

and Anthony Quaranta 

/s/ Anne E. Duprey _____________ 

Catherine F. Burgett (0082700) 

Anne E. Duprey (0087798) 

FROST BROWN TODD LLC 

10 West Broad Street, Suite 2300 

Columbus, Ohio 43215 

Telephone: (614) 464-1211 

Facsimile: (614) 464-1737 

cburgett@fbtlaw.com 

aduprey@fbtlaw.com

Counsel for Pera Odishoo and Marshall International, LLC 

/s/ Tyler B. Pensyl 

Tyler B. Pensyl (0080649) 

Michael J. Ball (0084150) 

VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP 

52 East Gay Street, P.O. Box 1008 

Columbus, Ohio 43216-1008 

Telephone: (614) 464-6334 

Facsimile: (614) 719-5072 

tbpensyl@vorys.com 

mjball@vorys.com

Attorneys for Defendants Polekatz Gentleman’s Club, LLC and Stephen Dabrowski

Case: 2:17-cv-00985-ALM-EPD Doc #: 62 Filed: 08/07/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 375
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7795

CLAUDE GENE SLOAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-965)

Submitted: June 30, 2004 Decided: July 29, 2004

Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claude Gene Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Claude Gene Sloan seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge

and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254

proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Sloan has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Caudle *v.*Turner.

Opinion delivered April 1, 1929.

*R. A. Rowe,*for petitioner.

Per Curiam.

'Counsel for appellant invokes a rule against the clerk of the court because he refused to file a purported transcript in the above entitled case. The clerk refused because the transcript was not tendered to him within sis months next after the rendition of the judgment in the circuit court, as required by § 2140 of Crawford & Moses’Digest.

Counsel for appellant claims the delay was occasioned by the circuit court in failing sooner to overrule his motion for a new trial. The time for appeal runs from the rendition of the judgment, and not from the overruling of the motion for a new trial. Appeals must be taken within six months, unless the person applying therefor was an infant or of unsound mind at the time of the rendition of the judgment, order or decree. Applicant for the appeal in this case does not icome within the exceptions, and no authority is given the court to extend the time. *Smith*v. *State,*48 Ark. 148, 2 S. W. 661; *Moore*v. *Henderson,*74 Ark. 181, 85 S. W. 237; and *Evans*v. *St. L. I. M.*& *S. R. Co.,*76 Ark. 266, 88 S. W. 994.

As applying the rule, see also *Chatfield*v. *Jarrett,*108 Ark. 523, 158 S. W. 146; *Oxford Telephone Mfg. Co.*v. *Arkansas National Bank,*134 Ark. 386, 204 S. W. 1140; and *Durben*v. *Montgomery,*144 Ark. 153, 223 S. W. 17.

The motion for the rule will therefore be denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

DAVID E. KIDD, 

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:18-cv-131 

- vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

TIM SHOOP, Warden, 

 Chillicothe Correctional Institution 

 : 

 Respondent. 

RECOMMITTAL ORDER 

 

 This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Objections (ECF No. 9) to the 

Magistrate Judge’s Supplemental Report and Recommendations recommending dismissal of the 

Petition (ECF No. 8). 

The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be 

more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions 

to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that 

analysis. 

May 22, 2018. */Thomas M. Rose 

 _____________________________ 

 Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA

 
      Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share - Primary and fully diluted net income
      (loss) per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares
      outstanding after consideration of the dilutive effect of stock warrants
      (after giving effect for the reorganization). The weighted average number
      of common shares used in the calculation was 1,743,612, 1,165,329 and
      1,140,000 for 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Primary and fully diluted
      net income (loss) per common share did not include the effect of the
      restricted stock awards until the condition for their issuance was met,
      and the shares were released. Stock options are not included in 1996 or
      1994 as their effect is anti-dilutive.
EXHIBIT 32.2






|STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Michael E. Havener, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  the Company.



| | /s/
    Michael E. Havener                                                             
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Michael E. HavenerChief Financial OfficerPremiere Global Services, Inc.November 9, 2006



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,048,927
<SECURITIES>                                 1,773,202
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,208,316
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,129,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,572
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,330,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,129,320
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,355
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               338,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,394,483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,394,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,394,483)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (64.42)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (64.42)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NET LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00783]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Radiation-Induced Immune 
Dysfunction (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: February 2-3, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kelly L. Hudspeth, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5067, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#147f7178786d3a7c6170676471607c547a7d7c3a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6cdc3cacadf88ced3c2d5d6c3d2cee6c8cfce88c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 11, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00783 Filed 1-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6915
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES LLOYD LAMBERT, II, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at R oanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-91-21, CA-94-924-R) Submitted: September 23, 1997 Decided: October 9, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Lloyd Lambert, II, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald,Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking relief from the court's judgment denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lambert , Nos. CR-91-21; CA-94-924- R (W.D. Va. June 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY>   U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          67,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    410,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               623,616
<PP&E>                                         838,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                 701,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 893,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,511,007
<BONDS>                                        522,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,572
<COMMON>                                         5,713
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,653,591)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   893,701
<SALES>                                        267,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               863,424
<CGS>                                          107,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  729,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,693
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>