alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of 24 Hour Auction
  (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended May 31, 2003 as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, the undersigned, being
  the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that:

|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: September 17, 2004 | Signed: | /s/ Robin Lee                                          
|------------------------ | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Name:   | Robin Lee                                              
|                         | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 137066 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137066 

 COA: 283392 

St. Clair CC: 02-001479-FC 

HARRY JACOB WALTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the Internationa! Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2012-. OaZ, ^ 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

1J^ 

iAi/\ .nCKtciVibNT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED 

DOCKET GST- \ t - C>OZ* i ACTIO?! DATE , 

This ;i[-:p'-ov:.' >iic: ftr;ini of antitrust immunity is sutject, where applicable, 

to coi;iiii:oris previously imposed. 

This action is cfl'ective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

!4 C\-\\ 385.30 or a review is undeitaicen on the Department's own motion. 

In view of the agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

the above,,pT^cedure, the^^^ y perjo<yn J 4 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

%\ n^ i 

15 February 2012 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

1776 K.St. N.W. #12* Floor 

Washington DC 20006
Exhibit 21.

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF NATIONAL LAMPOON, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       Name of Subsidiary         State of Incorporation         Business Name
-------------------------------   ----------------------   -------------------------
<S>                                     <C>                <C>
National Lampoon Networks, Inc.          Delaware          National Lampoon Networks
  National Lampoon Tours, Inc.          California          National Lampoon Tours
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

To the Board of Directors
National Lampoon Inc. and Subsidiaries

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation in the Registration Statements of National
Lampoon Inc. on Form S-8, SEC File Numbers 333-91260 and 333-50932 which were
filed with the Commission on June 26, 2002 and November 30, 2000, respectively,
of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm's Report dated October 15,
2005 covering the consolidated financial statements of National Lampoon Inc. and
Subsidiaries for each of the two years in the period ended July 31, 2006.


/s/ Stonefield Josephson, Inc.

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Santa Monica, California
November 14, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01179]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete product(s) from the 
Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: February 20, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S Clark Street, Suite 715, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information or to submit 
comments contact: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 785-6404, or 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0838d948586a5a492a5a78081a2a9aca9b4b98faea5eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93d0dec7d6d5f6f7c1f6f4d3d2f1fafffae7eadcfdf6bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Deletions

    The following product(s) are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

Product(s)

NSN(s)--Product Name(s): 7530-01-398-2661--Easel Pad, Ruled, White, 
27'' x 34''
Designated Source of Supply: Alabama Industries for the Blind, 
Talladega, AL
Contracting Activity: GSA/FAS ADMIN SVCS ACQUISITION BR(2), NEW 
YORK, NY

NSN(s)--Product Name(s):
    MR 343--Handheld Spiralizer
    MR 13007--Julienne Peeler
    MR 13008--Melon Baller
Designated Source of Supply: CINCINNATI ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND 
AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED, Cincinnati, OH
Contracting Activity: Military Resale-Defense Commissary Agency

Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2022-01179 Filed 1-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Devany. Dennis (OST) From:
.. ' Alan Folsom [alan.folsom@charter.net]


### ,$ent: ;;. .:.. .Monday, February 15, 2010 8:29AM

. To: ., .•,c.. bev'any;'Dennis (OST)



### Co:
. Swanson, Brian (OST) 

# 03**S~!Jj~(*** EAS**s.~rvice** at Plattsburgh International Airport

# T}''d~nAf~Dev~:~y Brian Swanson Dear Sirs: I am opposed tothe replacement of Cape Air with Colgan Air as the EASproviderat Plattsburgh International Airport. Considering the close proximity of Plattsburgh, NYto Burlington, VT where a state of the art airport served byfive or more airlines exists, one can question the need forany EAS activity in Plattsburgh. Cape Air has a record of providing excellent service to Plattsburgh and does it with more frequent flights, lower fares,and most of all, at lower cost to the taxpayers than theprogram as planned by Colgan Air. Thepurpose and spirit of the EAS program is being perverted by Plattsburgh business advocates who hope to attract passengertrafficfrom Canada and who feel, without anystudies to backthem up, that such expansion will attract business to the area. Whether or not this business enhancing supposition has any real merit is irrelevant tothe issue of selecting a provider considering the fundamental purpose of theEAS program. Grandiose aspirations and hopes vocalized repeatedly bythe Chamberof Commerce and local business interests yet funded bythetaxpaying public are disingenuous and have little or nothing to do with the issue at hand. Considering these very troubled financial times I hope that only unbiased considerations of the needs of taxpayers, travelers and airservice providers guide you in a decision that is rational, defensible and fairto all concerned. Thankyou for yourservice and efforts.

Alan L. Folsom, M.D. 44 Cumberland Ave. Plattsburgh, NY 12901 alan.folsom @charter.net

1
H e ll o t h e r e

,

M y n a m e i s A n t ony V

. L óp e z

, I a m a n U nd e r g r a d a t G e o r g e t o w n U n i v e r s it y i n Wa s h i ng t on D C

. I g r e w up a nd g r a du a t e d f r o m A v e n a l

. I a m m a j o r i ng i n E nv i r on m e n t a l B i o l ogy a nd mi no r i ng i n C u l t u r e & P o liti c s

.

T h e r e ce n t d e c i s i on t o g r a nd f a t h e r t h e p r opo s e d A v e n a l P o w e r P l a n t t o o l d s t a nd a r d s i s s i m p l y

un acce p t a b l e

. O bv i ou s l y n e w s t a nd a r d s a r e p a s s e d t o b e t t e r acc o mm od a t e f i nd i ng s a nd n e w

und e r s t a nd i ng o f t

h e e nv i r on m e n t

. I do no t n ee d m

y s t ud i e s o r l og i c t o e xp l a i n ho w ho r r i b l e i t w ill b e t o a l l o w a ny s o r t o f c on t a mi n a ti on t o

r e a c h m y p e op l e i n A v e n a l

.

T o c u t t o t

h e c h a s e

. R e g a r d l e s s o f w h a t e v e r k i c k

- b ac k s o r t h r ea t s t h e A v e n a l po w e r p l a n g r oup i s

i s s u i ng

, E P A m u s t li v e up t o it s m o r a l s t a nd a r d s a nd s t a nd up f o r w h a t i s b e s t f

o r t h e p e op l e a nd t

h e

ea r t h

. I t s i n t h e b e s t i n t e r e s t o f e v e r yon e t o upd a t e a ll p l a n s t o t h e m o s t c u r r e n t r u l e s a nd r e gu l a ti on s

. E n s u r e t h e l ong e v i t

y o f t h e po w e r p l a n t a nd t h e p e op l e a r ound it !

I t ' s a no

- b r a i n e r

. D o t h e r i gh t t h i ng

. F e e l good a bou t you r s e l f

.

- A n t o n y V

. L ó p ez

G e o r g e t o w n S F S

A v e n a l P o w e r P l a n t ( M u s t b e h e l d t o C U R R E N T S T ANDA R D S)

A n t ony L op ez

t o :

R 9 A i r P e r mit s

04 / 12 / 2011 11 : 05 P M

H i d e D e t a i l s

F r o m: A n t ony L op e z

T o : R 9 A i r P e r mit s @ E P A

H i s t o r y : T h i s m e s s a g e h a s b e e n f o r w a r d e d

. P a g e 1 o f 1

4 / 14 / 2011
#### Henry Churchill and others v. Mary E. Burt.

*Probate matters: Appeals: Common-laio judgment: Review: Writ of error.*The decision of the circuit court affirming on appeal an order of the probate court, extending a commission on claims and directing the commissioners to hear and adjudicate upon a specified claim, is not a common-law final order or judgment, and cannot be reviewed on writ of error.

*Heard and decided October 20.*

Error to Calhoun Circuit.

*PKgby & Gibson*and *Hughes, O’Brien é Smiley,*for plaintiffs in error.

*T. G. Pray,*for defendant in error.

*491Per CuriaM:

Defendant in error brought a claim against the estate of John Burt before commissioners of claims, and upon their report being made it was insisted by her that they had not passed upon her claim, and she thereupon applied to the probate court either to hear the claim or remit it for hearing to the commissioners. The plaintiffs in error demurred to the application, and the probate court thereupon made an order extending the time of the commissioners and for them to adjudicate upon' the claim. The' plaintiffs, in error then appealed from this order to the circuit court, and that court affirmed it. The plaintiffs in error then sued out this writ, of error to obtain a revision of the decision of the circuit, in affirming the order of the probate court. We think that the determination of the circuit court was not a common-law final order or judgment, and is not reviewable upon writ of error.

The writ was improvidently issued, and must be dismissed.
CEO/CFO CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PURSUANT  TO  18  U.S.C. STATUTE 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002, THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS
OFFICERS OF SUBJEX CORPORATION. (THE "COMPANY") THAT (A) THE QUARTERLY REPORT OF
THE  COMPANY  ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31ST 2003 FULLY COMPLIES
WITH  THE  REQUIREMENTS  OF SECTION 13(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND  (B)  THE  INFORMATION  CONTAINED  IN  SUCH  REPORT  FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL
MATERIAL  RESPECTS,  THE  FINANCIAL  CONDITION OF THE COMPANY AT THE END OF SUCH
PERIOD  AND  THE  RESULTS  OF  OPERATIONS  OF  THE  COMPANY  FOR  SUCH  PERIOD.



                                    BY  /S/ ANDREW HYDER
                                        ------------------------------
                                        ANDREW HYDER, CEO (ACTING CFO)


<PAGE>
#### People v Fernandez,

No. 90981;

Court of Appeals No. 133793.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4827]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee

    Pursuant to section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the FAA Research, Engineering and Development (R,E&D) Advisory 
Committee.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Name: Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee.
    Time and Date: April 20, 2011--9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Place: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW--Round Room (10th Floor), Washington, DC 20591.
    Purpose: The meeting agenda will include receiving from the 
Committee guidance for FAA's research and development investments in 
the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human 
factors and environment and energy. Attendance is open to the 
interested public but seating is limited. Persons wishing to attend the 
meeting or obtain information should contact Gloria Dunderman at (202) 
267-8937 or gloria.dunderman@faa.gov. Attendees will have to present 
picture ID at the security desk and be escorted to the Round Room.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 24, 2011.
Paul Fontaine,
Director (A), Research & Technology Development.
[FR Doc. 2011-4827 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
Exhibit 31(b)

CERTIFICATIONS

**
I, James A. Parke, certify that:
 
1. 
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of General    Electric Capital Services, Inc.; 
 
2. 
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under    which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period    covered by this report; 
 
3. 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other    financial information included in this report, fairly present in all    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash    flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this    report; 
 
4. 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and    procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for    the registrant and have: 
  
a) 
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused    such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,    including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others    within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report    is being prepared; 
  
b) 
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure    controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about    the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end    of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
  
c) 
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the    registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is    reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control    over financial reporting; and 
 
5. 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over    financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of    registrant's board of directors: 
  
a) 
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are    reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,    process, summarize and report financial information; and 
  
b) 
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management    or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal    control over financial reporting.
 

Date: March 5, 2004

 

/s/ 
James A. Parke  
James A. Parke 
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

**
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 14, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00999-CV

MICHAEL BROUSSARD, Appellant 

V.

LOVELY ABRAHAM, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Fort Bend County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 18-CCV-063029 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 9, 2018. The notice of 

appeal was filed November 15, 2018. To date, our records show that appellant has 

not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in 

civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs). 

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207 (2013). 
2

On January 14, 2019, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing 

fee on or before February 1, 2019 or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has 

not paid the appellate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice 

from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
#### John J. Murphy’s Case.

January 18, 1940.

*J. M. Hargedon,*for the claimant.

*J. P. Kane,*City Solicitor, for the city of Lawrence.

Appeal dismissed. This is a petition filed in the Superior Court by an employee to enforce an alleged agreement approved by the Industrial Accident Board between an employee and his employer, which stands also in the position of insurer. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152, § 6. Such an agreement, if in conformity to law, may be enforced by the Superior Court under the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152, § 11, as amended, providing that the Superior Court “shall . . . render a decree in accordance therewith,” but that “there shall be no appeal therefrom . . . where the decree is based upon ... a memorandum of agreement.” By force of this statute no appeal lies from a decree on the petition in this case, and the appeal must be dismissed. *Dempsey’s Case,*230 Mass. 583, 587. *Sterling’s Case,*233 Mass. 485, 490. *DiLeo’s Case,*295 Mass. 568, 570-571. *Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd.*v. *DiLeo,*298 Mass. 401, 402-403. See also *Young*v. *Duncan,*218 Mass. 346, 353-354; *Sciola’s Case,*236 Mass. 407, 411-412; *Rocha’s Case,*300 Mass. 121, 125.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 4 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 4

   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
                         President pro tempore.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
                         President pro tempore.

    Resolved, That the President of the United States be notified of 
the election of the Honorable Chuck Grassley as President of the Senate 
pro tempore.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of RMS Titanic,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K Amendment  No.2 for the period ending  February 28, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2002 (the "Report"),  I,
Arnie Geller,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Arnie Geller
-------------------------
Arnie Geller
Chief Executive Officer
September 20, 2002
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
(the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely
as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.



|                 |  |  |  |    |  |                                        
|---------------- |  |  |  | -- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | Bank of America, N.A.,                 
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|                 |  |  | 
|November 5, 2012 |  |  |  | By |  | /S/ NANCY G. WILLIS                    
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | Nancy G. Willis                        
|                 |  |  |  |    |  | Vice President