alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Case No. 3:18-cr-00028
Plaintiff, . District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
vs.

MARCOS GALVEZ,

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY

This matter came before the Court for hearing on April 2, 2018 before United States
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, who thereafter issued a Report and Recommendations.
(Doc. #7). Having conducted a full colloquy with Defendant Marcos Galvez, the Magistrate
Judge concluded that Defendant's plea of guilty is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and
that there is an adequate factual basis for a finding of guilty as charged in the Information.

The Court, noting that no Objections to the Report and Recommendations have been
filed and that the time for filing Objections has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report
and Recommendations.

Therefore, based on the aforesaid, and this Court’s de novo review of the record and the
findings by the United States Magistrate Judge, this Court adopts the findings and
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and finds that Defendant Marcos Galvez’s guilty

plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent. Defendant is FOUND GUILTY as charged in


the Information of the offense to which he pled—specifically, Theft of a Firearm from a

Federal Firearms Licensee in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(u).

LIS

Walter Herbert Rice
United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  To be published.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:  Thursday, January 
20, 2022 at 2 p.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:  The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
January 20, 2022 at 2 p.m. has been changed to Thursday, January 20, 
2022 at 2:15 p.m.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: January 13, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01000 Filed 1-14-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Opinion issued September 21 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 21
- 00087
- CV

——————————— IN RE HYDROCHEM LLC , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDU M OPINION Relator, HydroChem LLC, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order compelling production of documents in response to two production requests in the underlying case. 1 We deny the petition.

1 The underlying case is Nathen Bang v. HydroChem Industrial Cleaning LLC, et al

. , cause number 2020

- 18662 , pending in the 133rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland pres iding.2 PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Jus tice s Goodman, Landau , and Countiss.
1

The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for the District

of North Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

Nos. 08-2428/2615

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeals from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of North Dakota.

Larry J. Young, *

* [PUBLISHED]

Appellant, *

*

Huey Long Company, Inc., *

*

Garnishee. *

___________

Submitted: July 7, 2009

Filed: January 29, 2010

___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Larry J. Young challenges the district court’s1

denial of his motion for contempt and its order of garnishment. 
-2-

In September 1990, Young was ordered to pay restitution to the United States

as a condition of supervised release, after he was found guilty of filing false tax

claims. Young was discharged from supervised release in November 1993 and the

criminal case terminated. In January 2008, the government applied for a writ of

continuing garnishment, naming Young’s employer as garnishee. Young moved to

quash the proceeding and later to dismiss, asserting the government was “mixing civil

and criminal jurisdictions.” The district court denied the motions, ruling the

government could initiate collection proceedings to collect a fine or restitution as part

of a criminal sentence. 

Young then moved to hold the government in contempt, claiming it had filed

a false lien notice in the county recorder’s office, and had violated a court order by

initiating the garnishment proceeding despite his discharge from supervised release.

The court denied the motion because Young’s obligation to pay restitution did not

terminate when his supervised release ended. See United States v. Rostoff, 164 F.3d

63, 66 (1st Cir. 1999) (failure to pay at the time due renders payment overdue; it does

not abate the obligation; restitution order extinguished by satisfaction, not by passage

of time). Young appeals the district court’s denial of his contempt motion and seeks

to proceed in forma pauperis in appeal No. 08-2428. We dismiss this appeal as

premature because Young filed his notice of appeal before final judgment was entered,

and the merits of the appeal are before this court in appeal No. 08-2615.

This court concludes the district court did not err in ordering garnishment or

denying in forma pauperis status. See In re: Southwestern Glass Co., Inc., 332 F.3d

513, 516 (8th Cir. 2003) (conclusions of law are reviewed de novo). The judgment

is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

TOYA EVETTE GRAY,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:18-cv-462

v. Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,

Defendant.
ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand
to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),
which is hereby GRANTED. (ECF No. 17.) The Court REMANDS this case for further
proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the Appeals Council
will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision, and the Commissioner will
conduct further proceedings and develop the administrative record as necessary, to determine
whether Plaintiff is under a disability as defined by the Social Security Act. The Court

DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
\-3I-x0la /*
DATE EDMUNDA. SARGUS, JR.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 10.2


 





ATRINSIC, INC.


 


65 Atlantic Avenue


Boston, Massachusetts 02110


 


October 30, 2015


 


Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.


777 Third Avenue, 30th Floor


New York, NY 10017


Attn.: Mr. Yoav Roth


 





	Re:  	3rd Amendment to First Amended and Restated Security Agreement


 







Dear Mr. Roth:


 


Reference is made to the incremental $25,000.00
loan from Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. to Atrinsic, Inc. being funded today which will be evidenced by a Convertible Promissory
Note of even date herewith. We hereby confirm that “Notes” as defined in the First Amended and Restated Security Agreement
dated December 18, 2014, as amended from time to time, shall be further amended to include all of the notes described on Exhibit
A hereto.


 


Except as modified hereby or by any prior amendments, the First
Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated December 18, 2014 shall remain in full force and effect.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Edward Gildea
	 	Edward Gildea,
	 	President


 


Agreed to and Accepted:


 


Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.


 


	By:	/s/ Yoav Roth	 
	Yoav Roth, Authorized Signatory	 


 









     


     


    

 


Exhibit A


 


Notes Covered by First Amended and Restated
Security Agreement


by and among


Atrinsic, Inc., Iroquois Master Fund
LTD and Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD





 


	Note Date	 	Holder	 	Note Amount
	 	 	 	 	 
	2/11/2014	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$87,500.00
	2/11/2014	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$87,500.00
	8/15/2014	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$45,000.00
	8/15/2014	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$45,000.00
	12/18/2014	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$75,000.00
	12/18/2014	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$75,000.00
	5/15/2015	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$50,000.00
	5/15/2015	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$50,000.00
	9/3/2015	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$25,000.00
	9/3/2015	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$25,000.00
	10/30/2015	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$25,000.00
	10/30/2015	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$25,000.00
Exhibit 23
  CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   We
      hereby consent
      to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
      (Nos. 33-58396, 33-67218, 33-58797, 33-56721, 333-45402, and 333-59722) of
      Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2008 relating
      to
      the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness
      of
      internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
      10-K.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP
 Richmond,
      Virginia
 February
      4,
      2008
August 7, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF C .N.S AND C.D.S., CHI LDREN
NO. 14

- 14

- 00301

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an appeal fro m a judgment terminating parental rights signed April 1, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision cer tified below for observance. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
* Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of

this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1592

DONALD L. MCINTIRE, SR.,

Petitioner,

versus

CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE

OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(96-1143-BLA)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Donald L. McIntire, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. William Steele

Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, Morgantown, West Virginia; Patricia May

Nece, Dorothy L. Page, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C. for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. McIntire v.

Consolidation Coal Co., BRB No. 96-1143-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 14, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2435

GEORGE SYLVESTER FLOYD, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS E. WHITE, Secretary of the Army; CLAUDE

WILLIAMS, Adjutant General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-01-362-2)

Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Sylvester Floyd, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark David Maxwell,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Sylvester Floyd, Sr. seeks to appeal the district

court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss his Title

VII action. The Appellees have moved to dismiss Floyd’s appeal as

untimely. We grant the Appellees’ motion and dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction because Floyd’s notice of appeal was not

timely filed.

Parties are accorded sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

September 27, 2001. Floyd’s notice of appeal was filed on November

27, 2001. Because Floyd failed to file a timely notice of appeal

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

grant the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Sky
Pass Corp.


18124
Wedge Pkwy, Ste 1050


Reno,
NV 89511


Telephone:
(415-279-2411)


 


 


 


May 19'", 2015


 


Dear Sirs, 


We would like to express our sincere respect, and on
the basis of preliminary negotiations, in our joint collaboration we hope to find new stages for the development of new business
areas that would be of interest to both parties.


The "B4U CARD SOLUTIONS" has a contractual
relationship with the well-known European manufacturers of access systems "SKIDATA" since May 2015.


Our current project with "SKIDATA" is related
to the joint use of prepaid cards "B4U CARD SOLUTIONS" with the technology of Ski-Data access system, used in SkiPass
cards.


On the basis of existing
agreements with "SKIDATA", the "B4U CARD SOLUTIONS" is ready to develop a card program for "Sky Pass
Corp." within the framework of which there might be issued prepaid cards with the SkiPass function.


 


Best regards,


 


 


/s/ Grischew Gerard


Grischew Gerard


Chief Executive Office
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HFFinancial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis L. Hage, Chairman, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Curtis L. Hage                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Curtis L. Hage, Chairman,  President |
|   | and Chief Executive  Officer         |
|   |                                 |   |
|   | Date:                                | May  13, 2004 |
|   |                                 |   |

 

*                                         A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to HF Financial Corp. andwill be retained by HF Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacitybut solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Trust. 

 
  
Argent Trust Company,
    
Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
  November 13, 2023 By /S/ NANCY WILLIS    
Nancy Willis
    
Vice President
  **
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4508 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4508

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS 
UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 
1958.
    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 111-89 (123 Stat. 2975), is 
amended by striking ``January 31, 2010'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``April 30, 2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 30, 2010.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2021-N-1037]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 22, 2021. The document announced the withdrawal of approval of 216 abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) from multiple applicants, as of November 22, 2021. The document was published with an incorrect date. In addition, the document indicated that FDA was withdrawing approval of ANDA 075941, Strontium Chloride SR-89 Injection, 1 millicurie/milliliter, held by Bio-Nucleonics, Inc., 1600 Market St., Suite 13200, Philadelphia, PA 19103, for repeated failure to submit annual reports. Before FDA withdrew the approval of this ANDA, the application holder informed FDA that it submitted annual reports for ANDA 075941. Therefore, FDA rescinds its withdrawal of approval of ANDA 075941. The approval of ANDA 075941 is still in effect.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        James Hanratty, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1671, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-4718,                         *James.Hanratty@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Corrections

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of Friday, October 22, 2021 (86 FR 58675), in FR Doc. 2021-23075, the following corrections are made:                

                    1. On page 58675, in the second column, correct the                     **DATES**                     section to read:                     **DATES:**                     Approval is withdrawn as of October 22, 2021.”                

2. On page 58679, in the table, remove the entry for ANDA 075941.

Dated: January 12, 2022.

Lauren K. Roth,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-00831 Filed 1-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

November 22, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00829-CV

No. 14-22-00830-CV

IN RE MARK A LEPPARD, INDIVIDUALLY, AIR TECHNICS, AND ATI 

ADVANTAGE LLC, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

506th Judicial District Court

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 16-04-23701 & 16-04-23701-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 9, 2022, relators Mark A Leppard, Individually, Air Technics,

and ATI Advantage LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See 

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators
2

ask this court to compel the presiding judge of the 506th Judicial District Court of 

Waller County, to vacate the October 12, 2017 sanctions order and the October 12, 

2017 final judgment. 

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.