alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4587 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require spending limits 

be imposed when the statutory limit on the public debt is increased. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2010 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require 

spending limits be imposed when the statutory limit on 

the public debt is increased. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cap Spending to Re5 duce Borrowing Act’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4587 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPENDING LIMITS WHEN DEBT CEILING IN2 CREASED. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 312 of the Congressional 

4 Budget Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(g) POINT OF ORDER TO REQUIRE SPENDING LIM7 ITS WHENEVER DEBT CEILING INCREASES.—(1) Except 

8 as provided by paragraph (2), it shall not be in order in 

9 the House of Representatives or the Senate to consider 

10 any bill or joint resolution, or amendment thereto or con11 ference report thereon, that increases the statutory limit 

12 on the public debt unless such bill, joint resolution, 

13 amendment, or conference report, as the case may be, in14 cludes limits on the total level of discretionary spending 

15 and on the total level of direct spending for each of 10 

16 consecutive fiscal years beginning with the first fiscal year 

17 in which the increase in the statutory limit on the public 

18 debt would occur. 

19 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any measure 

20 that increases the statutory limit on the public debt if stat21 utory limits on the total level of discretionary spending 

22 and on the total level of direct spending for each of 10 

23 consecutive fiscal years beginning with the first fiscal year 

24 in which the increase in the statutory limit on the public 

25 debt would occur are in place.’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4587 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsections (c)(1) 

2 and (d)(2) of section 904 of the Congressional Budget Act 

3 of 1974 are each amended by inserting ‘‘312(g),’’ after 

4 ‘‘310(d)(2),’’. 

5 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF GEPHARDT RULE. 

6 The Rules of the House of Representatives are 

7 amended by repealing rule XXVIII (relating to the statu8 tory limit on public debt) and redesignating rule XXIX 

9 as rule XXVIII. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
### SERVE D OCTOBE

R18 , 20. 0

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S v:;- , np T \< ^ P 1-3 0 WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTERO F FEDERA LEXPRESS , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10GL000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FA A 2010-053 9 

### HEARIN G NOTIC E NOTIC E I S HEREB Y GIVE N tha t testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e hear dan dconsidere d o n Januar y 1 8 an d19,2011 , i n Courtroo mTBA , U.S . Distric t Court , Norther n Distric t o f Illinois , Everet t

McKinle y Diricse n Building , 21 9 Sout hDearbor n Street , Chicago , Illinoi s 60604. ' Hearing s will,;:o«H»eijc e at 9:0 0 a.m . an dconclud e at 4:3 0 p.m . eac hday . Th e partie s shoul dvatJat e th e courat^je^^ r

before 5:0 0 p.m . eac hday . uchardjC . Goodwi n J.S . Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

' Th e partie s shouldconfir

mthe courtroo

mwit hLarr y Collins , Administrative Assistan t t o the Chief

Judge , Roo m2530 A [312-435-5603 ; FA

X 312-408-5088] , prior

t o or o n the da y o f hearing .B ^ B

FA A Docke t No . CPI0GL000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ^

ON E COP Y Courtne y E . Felts , Respondent' s Counse l Staf f Attorney , Federa l Express , Inc . 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g B , 3" ^ Floo r Memphis , TN 38125-880 0 TEL : 901-434-863 2 FAX : 901-434-828 3 Kat e Barber , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e of Regiona l Coimse l Great ^ake s Region , AGL- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e DesPIaines.I L6001 8 TEL : 847-294-786 2 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

of Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Legal Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g addjr^f j jPedera l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e ZWitw.Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

AMUSA CONTEH,
Case No. 2:17-ev-0958

Petitioner, Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

v.

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
GENERAL, et al.,

Respondents.

OPINION AND ORDER
On April 2, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Report and Recommendation
denying Petitioner’s Motion for an Immediate Stay of Removal (ECF No. 4), and recommending
that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) be granted and that this action be dismissed.
(ECF No. 8.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate
Judge’s Order and Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no

objections have been filed.

The Order and Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is ADOPTED and
AFFIRMED. Petitioner’s Motion for an Immediate Stay of Removal (ECF No. 4) is DENIED.
Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED. This action is hereby
DISMISSED.

Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by the failure to file objections. See Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the


Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FY Y~Ab- AON

ED. A. SARGUS, JR.
Chief United States District Judge
#### Jermany *v.*Hartsell.

4-8676

216 S. W. 2d 381

Opinion delivered January 10, 1949.

*408
      *Wade Kitchens*and *W. E. Kitchens, Jr.,*for appellant.

*McKay, McKay $ Anderson,*for appellee.

George Eose Smith, J.

Jermany and his wife filed their verified complaint under Ark. Stats. (1947), § 29-506, seeking to set aside a foreclosure decree for unavoidable casualty which prevented their appearance. The chancellor sustained the appellees’ demurrer to the complaint; from his order of dismissal comes this appeal. The only question is as. to the sufficiency of appellants ’ pleading.

The complaint asserts unavoidable casualty in that neither Jermany nor his wife was served with summons or had any knowledge of the suit. These allegations are sufficient. *Hunton*v. *Euper,*63 Ark. 323, 38 S. W. 517. While the foreclosure decree recited personal service on each defendant, such a recital may be shown to have been untrue. *Federal Land Bank*v. *Cottrell,*197 Ark, 783, 126 S. W. 2d 279.

The appellees’ principal contention is that the complaint failed to state a meritorious defense to the original action, as of course was necessary. *Federal Land Bank*v. *Cottrell, supra.*In this respect the pleading alleged that the foreclosure sale was held on November 19, 1943, and was confirmed on December 2 of that year. In the interim between sale and confirmation appellee Hartsell, who had purchased at the sale and whom the appellants treat as the actual mortgagee, sold timber from the lands for 'an amount more than sufficient to pay the debt. Appellants argue that he should have applied the proceeds of this sale in satisfaction of the debt. We think their position is sustained by the holding in *Hirsch*v. *409
      *Perkins,*211 Ark. 388, 200 S. W. 2d 796, where it was shown that the mortgagee had removed from the land an amount of personal property sufficient to satisfy all or part of the balance due. It was decided that this proof established a meritorious defense, as the mortgagor did not owe all the debt and may have owed none of it.

So here, if Hartsell had applied the proceeds of the timber sale to appellants’ indebtedness, at least part of the obligation would have been paid. Although this timber transaction occurred between the foreclosure sale and its confirmation, this particular decree had provided that the appellants ’ title would be foreclosed and barred “upon the sale of said lands . . . *and confirmation thereof*... ” When the decree is so worded the mortgagor’s equity of redemption is not extinguished until confirmation. *Pope*v. *Wylds,*167 Ark. 40, 266 S. W. 458.

The appellees also insist that the ostensible mortgagee, J. W. Rhea, should have been made a party to this proceeding. The point was not raised in the trial court, however, and furthermore the appellants alleged that Hartsell was the real party in interest. We conclude that the complaint stated a cause of action upon which proof should be heard.

Reversed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

133061 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. AMERISURE, INC., Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Justices Appellee,

v SC: 133061 COA: 270736 Oakland CC: 04-062577-CK ANTHONY STEVEN BRENNAN,Defendant/Cross-DefendantAppellee,

and

CORPORATE AUTO RESOURCE SPECIALISTS, a/k/a KEN TOMPOR AUTO BROKER and LEASING LTD., Defendant-Appellant,

and

ALLMERICA FINANCIAL CORPORATION and CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/ Cross-Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and

PAUL SCHOENEMANN, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0914 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 21, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Richard A. Waldron, Chief Financial Officer of SciClone
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 8, 2006 |  | /s/ Richard A. Waldron 
|                  |  | Richard A. Waldron     
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00171

- CV

Leticia RODRIGUEZ

, Appellant/Cross

- Appellee

v.

Lydia RODRIGUEZ and Robert Pereida, Appellees/Cross

- Appellants

From the 224th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI19456 Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE RIOS

, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this c ourt’s opinion of this date, the portion of the trial court’s judgment that reduces Appella nt Leticia Rodriguez’s award “by improvements testified to by Defendants” is REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED that Leticia Rodriguez recover from Lydia Rodriguez and Robert Pereida, jointly and severally, damages in the amount of $35,400, representing the value for the use and occupation of the Property at $600.00 per month from November 1, 2015, through October 1, 2020. All other portions of the trial court’s judgment are AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellant Leticia Rodriguez recover her costs of this a ppeal from Appellees Lydia Rodriguez and Robert Pereida.

SIGNED December 21, 2022.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Deborah S. Hunt 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: July 11, 2022 

Mr. Richard W. Nagel 

Southern District of Ohio at Dayton 

200 W. Second Street 

Suite 712 Federal Building 

Dayton, OH 45402-0000 

Re: Case No. 21-3716, USA v. William Prigmore

Originating Case No: 3:17-cr-00187-1 

Dear Mr. Nagel: 

 Enclosed is a copy of the mandate filed in this case. 

Sincerely yours, 

s/Patricia J. Elder, Senior Case Manager 

 for Ryan Orme, Case Manager 

cc: Mr. Kevin Koller 

 Mr. William Prigmore 

Enclosure 

Case: 3:17-cr-00187-WHR Doc #: 221 Filed: 07/11/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 2261
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

________________ 

 No: 21-3716 

________________

Filed: July 11, 2022 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Plaintiff - Appellee 

v. 

WILLIAM PRIGMORE 

Defendant - Appellant 

MANDATE 

 Pursuant to the court's disposition that was filed 06/16/2022 the mandate for this case hereby 

issues today. 

COSTS: None 

Case: 3:17-cr-00187-WHR Doc #: 221 Filed: 07/11/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 2262
# San

# Joaqu¡n 

# Valley ü1 HEALTHY

# AIR LIVINGAIR POLLUTIflÌ{ GflI{TRflL llISTRICT

December 

### 6,2013 Mr. 

### Mike Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluations Section California 

### Air Resources Board P.O. Box 

### 2815 Sacramento, 

### CA 95812
Dear Mr. Guzzetta 

### Attached is

### the Rule 

### Action Package 

### for Rule

### 4308 (Boilers, Steam Generators, 

### and Process 

### Heaters-0.075 MMBtu/hr 

### to less

### than2.0 MMBtu/hr), 

### adopted by 

### the District's 

### Governing Board 

### on November 

### 14,2013. We request 

### the California 

### Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit 

### this ruleand 

### the appropriate documentation to

### the United 

### States Environmental Protection 

### Agency (EPA) as a 

### SIP revision. Included 

### withthis Rule

### Action Package arethe

### following attachments: 

### 1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 

## 2. ARBAPCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form 

## 3. Clean Copy 

### of Rule4308 

## 4. Underline/Strikeout Copy 

### of Rule4308 

## 5. Governing Board Resolution 

## 6. Governing Board Memo 

## 7. Evidence 

### of Public Hearing 

# L Final 

### Staff Report 

### withappendices lf

### you have any 

### questions, please 

### contact Chelsea Gonzales 

### at (559) 230-6100 or by

### e-mail at 

### Chelsea.Gonzales@valleyair.org. The District thanks 

### you and 

### your staff for 

### your assistance.

tr h irector of Strategies 

### and lncentives 

### Attachments
Seyed Sadredin Erecutive 0irectorlAir Pollution Control 0lficer

lìlorthern Region 4800 Enterprise Way Modesto, CA95356.8718 Tsl: (209) 557.6400 tAX: (2091 557.8475 Central Begion lMain Officel 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue Fresno, CA 53726.0244 TeL (559) 230-6000 tAX: (559) 230.6061 Southern Begion 34946 Flyover Court Bakerslield, CA 93308.9725 Tel: 661.392-5500 FAX: 661.392.5585 www.valleyair.org www.healthyairliving.com Priîr.donræychprpù. O
<page>	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Global
Perspective Portfolio L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:	    	Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:   	President

Date:	    	August 14, 2003
Exhibit
10.1


 


Addendum
#2 to Commitment Letter


 


Addendum
Effective Date: October 23, 2015


 


WHEREAS,
Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Borrower”) and Jim Davis and Mike Hanson (“Lenders”)(collectively “Parties”)
entered into a Commitment Letter, effective July 30th, 2014 (the “Agreement”) and amended on February 16, 2015; and


 


WHEREAS,
Mr. Hanson agreed to advance an additional $250,000 under the terms of the agreement on October 23, 2015.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


	1.		Pre-Established Terms



 


All
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and apply to this Addendum, unless specifically modified
herein.


 


In
Witness Whereof, this Amendment to the Commitment Letter has been duly executed as of the Addendum Effective Date written
above.


 


	Borrower:	 	Lender
	 	 	 
	Cachet
    Financial Solutions, Inc.	 	James
    Davis
	 	 	 
	By:
    	/s/
    Jeffrey Mack	 	By:
    	/s/
    James Davis
	Its:
    	Chief
    Executive Officer	 	 	 
	 	 	Lender
	 	 	 
	 	 	Michael
    Hanson
	 	 	 
	 	 	By: 	/s/
    Michael Hanson
```

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly report of Hydroflo, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dennis Mast, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Dennis Mast
------------------------
    Dennis Mast
    CEO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
    Accounting Officer

November 12, 2003
```
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

KIMBERLIN T. EDWARDS

NO. 2022 KW 0107

MAY 9, 2022

In Re: Kimberlin T. Edwards, applying for supervisory writs, 

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, 

No. 458, 662. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. The district court did not err in denying

relator' s motion to correct an illegal sentence. Relator' s

arguments in the motion to correct an illegal sentence do not

relate to the legality of the sentence under the applicable

statutes; and thus, the issues may not be raised in a motion to

correct an illegal sentence. See State v. Parker, 98- 0256 ( La. 

5/ 8/ 98), 711 So. 2d 694, 695 ( per curiam); State v. Gedric, 99- 

1213 ( La. App. lst Cir. 6/ 3/ 99), 741 So. 2d 849, 851- 52 ( per

curiam), writ denied, 99- 1830 ( La. 11/ 5/ 99), 751 So. 2d 239. If

relator is making a complaint with regard to the computation of

her sentence, La. R. S. 15: 1171( B) grants authority to the

Department of Public Safety and Corrections to adopt

administrative remedy procedures to receive, hear, and dispose

of complaints of time computations of sentences. Any complaint

pertaining to the time computations, including alleged parole

eligibility and credit for time served issues, must be made

under the Corrections Administrative Remedy Procedure ( CARP) as

provided in La. R. S. 15: 1171- 79 before seeking a remedy from the

district court. See Briscoe v. Department of Public Safety and

Corrections, 2017- 0470 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 7/ 24/ 17), 2017 WL

3124096. 

JMG

GH

WRC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT