alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 746 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 746

     Designating the week of October 4 through October 10, 2020, as 
                 ``National Community Policing Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 5, 2020

 Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Mr. Cornyn, and Ms. Hassan) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

                           November 12, 2020

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating the week of October 4 through October 10, 2020, as 
                 ``National Community Policing Week''.

Whereas police officers are indispensable members of the community who put their 
        lives on the line to protect others;
Whereas promoting strong relationships founded in trust and mutual respect 
        between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve helps 
        ensure the safe and effective execution of the law;
Whereas law enforcement officers and communities that work together to address 
        public safety concerns can create lasting solutions to difficult 
        challenges;
Whereas recent events have sparked a nationwide call to improve the interactions 
        between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve, 
        particularly communities of color;
Whereas community policing facilitates peaceful dialogue, capable of fostering 
        understanding and trust, between law enforcement officers and civilians;
Whereas community policing can help improve the equal enforcement of the laws;
Whereas community policing informs the public about the challenges that law 
        enforcement officers face in executing their duties and provides law 
        enforcement officers insight into the concerns of community members;
Whereas a long-term commitment to community policing is necessary to eliminate 
        the underlying causes of crime;
Whereas the advancement of community policing should be supported to ensure that 
        State and local law enforcement agencies have necessary resources; and
Whereas community policing has been recognized as an important tool for 
        improving the relationship between law enforcement officers and the 
        communities they serve: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of October 4 through October 10, 
        2020, as ``National Community Policing Week''; and
            (2) supports community policing and encourages the people 
        of the United States, law enforcement agencies, and elected 
        officials to identify ways in which communities can improve 
        public safety, strengthen relationships, and build trust.
                                 <all>
```
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 20

- 00136

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 2019

- 82952

Style: Renee Jefferson

- Smith

v. City of Houston, Texas and Harris County, Texas

Date motion filed * : 08/25/20

Type of motion: Motion to Issue Man date

Party filing motion: Appellee

— The City of Houston

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, doc ument due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

The City of Houston ’ s U nopposed M otion to Issue the Manda te is Granted. Mandate will be issued

immediately.

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Dat e: September 10, 2020
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA-125D

Directorate Identifier: 200BNM169AD

ISB. 57 -070 --- 10/15/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. Sw.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 pm., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03105/2008
EXHIBIT G 

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 237-9 Filed: 03/02/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 19796
10 Governor 10 Att. General 

District Kasich 1 Strickland 1 DeWine 1 Cordray 1 

4 · Jordan 52.80% 1 42.17% 1 54.61% 1 37.98% 1 

County Population % of District 

Clark 92,476 12.83% 

Champaign 40,097 5.56% 

logan 45,858 6.36% 

Shelby 49,423 6.85% 

Mercer 2,917 0.40% 

Auglaize 45,949 6.37% 

Allen 106,331 14.75% 

Hardin 8,152 1.13% 

Marion 12,114 1.68% 

Wyandot 13,585 1.88% 

Crawford 43,784 6.07% 

Huron 43,671 6.06% 

Erie 6,236 0.86% 

Seneca 56,745 7.87% 

Sandusky 60,944 8.45% 

Ottawa 19,868 2.76% 

lucas 68,911 9.56% 

Hancock 2,932 0.41% 

Wood 1,038 0.14% 

Total - 721,031 

Election Results 

08 President 06 Att. General 06Auditor 

McCain I Obama I Mont. I Dann I Taylor I Sykes I 53.26% 1 44.85% 1 50.82% 1 49.21% 1 55.50% 1 44.53% 1 

04 President 

Bush I Kerry PVI 

58.21% 1 41.27% R+8 

Voting Age Populations 

White I Hispanic I Black I Asian I Amlndian 

91.60% 1 3.25% 1 5.21% 1 o.s2% 1 o.25% 

~ 

i 

lo 

REV_00000026 

Plaintiffs' Trial

Exhibit

P604

Case No. 1:18-cv-00357

Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 237-9 Filed: 03/02/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 19797
#### Walton *v.*Rucker.

4-4744

Opinion delivered October 11, 1937.

*McDaniel, McCray*& *Crow,*for appellant.

*Kenneth C. Coff-elt*and *Ernest Briner,*for appellee.

MoHaNey, J.

This is the second appeal in this case. *Walton*v. *Rucker,*193 Ark. 40, 97 S. W. (2d) 442. The case was reversed on the former appeal because the trial court dismissed the action after permitting a sufficient number of affiants to withdraw their names from the supporting affidavit, leaving the number thereon less than ten, ten being jurisdictional in an election contest case. On a remand of the ease the trial court, after hearing the evidence, found the issues in favor of appellees, holding- that appellant had failed to prove his cause of action, and dismissed the complaint and the amendments thereto. This order was made and entered on the 18th day of November, 1936, and appellant was given until December 14, 1936, to file his motion for a new trial. The motion was filed in apt time and overruled on the nest day, December 15, and appellant was given one hundred days in which to prepare and file his bill of exceptions.’ Appellant did not file his bill of exceptions within one hun- • dred days as given in said order, which expired on March 24, 1937, but on March 28, 1937, at a subsequent term, on the application of appellant, the court attempted to extend the time in which appellant could file his bill of exceptions to April 13, 1937, and máde an order to this effect. The bill of exceptions was filed on April 9, 1937. *602The terms of the Saline circuit court, as fixed by § 2207, Crawford *&*Moses’ Digest, are the first Mondays in March and September in each year. Therefore, the September term of said court expired not later than the first Monday in March, 1937, and at the time the court made the order enlarging the time of filing the bill of exceptions, to-wit: March 28, 1937, the September term of court had lapsed and the court had no power at a subsequent term to enlarge the time. There are many cases so holding. In *Davies*v. *Nichols,*52 Ark. 554, 13 S. W. 129, this court said: “There is no bill of exceptions in the record. The paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions was not signed by the judge and filed within the time first given by the court. The order fixing the time within which the bill of exceptions might be signed by the judge and filed became final, and passed beyond the control of the court, when the term at which it was made expired, and the court had no authority to shorten or extend the time at a subsequent term.” Citing cases. See, also, *Engles*v. *Okla. Oil*& *Gas Co.,*163 Ark. 270, 259 S. W. 749.

The bill of exceptions not having been filed in time, the paper purporting to be such cannot be considered on appeal, and this court will presume that the issues were correctly determined in the trial court. *Petroleum Producers Association*v. *First National Bank,*165 Ark. 267, 263 S. W. 965; *L. D. Powell Co.*v. *Stockard,*170 Ark. 424, 279 S. W. 1001.

There being no bill of exceptions and no error apparent on the face of the record, the judgment must be affirmed. It is so ordered.
EXHIBIT (99.1)
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marx Toys and Entertainment Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Steve Wise, (Acting) Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/s/ Steve Wise
Steve Wise
Chief Executive Officer
Sole Officer and Director
May 15, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Superconductor Corporation (the Company) for the period
ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David A. Henry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 6, 2009 |  | /S/ DAVID A. HENRY     
|                     |  | David A. Henry         
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                  |   | P.A.M. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.             |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   |                                             |   |
| Dated: March 14, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Daniel H. Cushman                            |   |
|                  |   | DANIEL H. CUSHMAN                                |   |
|                  |   | President and Chief Executive Officer            |   |
|                  |   | (principal executive officer)                    |   |
|                  |   |                                             |   |
| Dated: March 14, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Lance K. Stewart                             |   |
|                  |   | LANCE K. STEWART                                 |   |
|                  |   | Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer, |   |
|                  |   | Secretary and Treasurer                          |   |
|                  |   | (principal accounting and financial officer)     |   |
|                  |   |                                             |   |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

SCOTT D. DALESANDRO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

-vs- 1:01-cv-109

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY,

Defendant.

NOTICE

The above-captioned case is REASSIGNED from the docket of the Honorable

Sandra S. Beckwith to the docket of the Honorable Susan J. Dlott. 

 

s/Karen F. Jones 

Karen F. Jones 

Division Manger

Case 1:01-cv-00109-SSB Document 76 Filed 10/21/2004 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         498,199
<SECURITIES>                                 1,973,761
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,397,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,036
<INVENTORY>                                     46,013
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,080,551
<PP&E>                                       1,103,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,717,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,144,604
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       722,859
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,894,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,717,300
<SALES>                                      2,531,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,811,180
<CGS>                                        1,540,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,471,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                    65,221
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# Comments on All Five of EPA's White Papers on Metha ne and VOC Emissions in the Oil and Natural Gas Sector

s white papers regarding methane and VOC emissions in the oil ’ all five of EPA Attached please find the exhibits to comments on and natural gas sector, released April 15, 2014. Air Task Force, and

comments on behalf of the Sierra Club, Natural Reso urces Defense Council, Clean We submit these ).” Commenters “ Earthworks. (together,
Any questions or concerns should be directed to bot h Nathan Matthews and Andres Restrepo: Nathan Matthews Staff Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 2nd St., Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 

### (415) 977-5695 Nathan.Matthews@sierraclub.org Andres Restrepo Associate Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 50 F Street, NW, Eighth Floor Washington, DC 20001 

### (202) 650-6073 andres.restrepo@sierraclub.org Best regards, Natalie Spiegel

-- **Natalie Spiegel Legal Assistant**  **Sierra Club Environmental Law Program** 

## Spiegel <natalie.spiegel@sierraclub.org> Natalie Mon 6/16/2014 11:55 PM To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; Cc: Andres Restrepo <andres.restrepo@sierraclub.org>; N athan Matthews <nathan.matthews@sierraclub.org>; 

##  3 attachments Ex. 1- Marten Newbold 2012.pdf; Ex. 2- ICF memo re ce ntrifugal compresor seal emissions.pdf; Ex. 3- Email DBon to DMcCabe 1Nov2013.pdf; 

## Page **1 of**  **2 Comments on All Five of EPA's White Papers on Metha...** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 27/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/** **85 Second Street, Second Floor**

**San Francisco, CA 94105 natalie.spiegel@sierraclub.org**  **415-977-5638** 

## Page **2 of**  **2 Comments on All Five of EPA's White Papers on Metha...** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 27/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
#### Hiatt v Accupac,

No. 91020;

Court of Appeals No. 133206.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the quarterly report of SpatiaLight, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Officer
      of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      David
      F. Hakala


David
      F.
      Hakala


Chief
      Executive Officer, Principal


Financial
      and Accounting Officer,


Chief
      Operating Officer







February
      14, 2007
From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mike Wilson - Duncan Technology Wednesday, March 05, 2008 11:41 AM Matt Oehler; Pat Finley; Mike McCabe Arron Karcher; Michael Segura; Walt Glover FW: BE-7 sds

Matt/Walt, this looks pretty good to me considering I didn’t give Walt much to work with.
One thing we may want to revise is the statement that this has not been evaluated by OSPAR etc.
Sodium hypochlorite is a registered biocide for use in the North Sea by a number of companies including: Nalco, Champion, M-I Drilling fluids, and Baker Petrolite. They all have it listed as "non-charmable" and classified as "E" on the OCNS rating scheme. (Which means it can be used in virtually unlimited quantities).
At some point we may want to register BE-7 for use in the North Sea either by ourselves or through one of these existing registrations.
Regards, Mike

J. Michael Wilson, Ph.D. Environmental Technical Excellence Leader Halliburton Energy Services Duncan Technology Center 2600 S. Second St. Duncan, OK 73536-0438 Ph: 580/251-4099 imichael.wilson@,halliburton.com

From: Matt Oehler Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:55 AM To: Mike Wilson - Duncan Technology; Pat Finley Subject: FW: BE-7 sds

Gents
FYI... Here is the first draft of the BE-7 sales data sheet. Feel free to give me your thoughts.

Thanks, Matt O Product Manager - Fracturing PE Delivery Office - 1,281,575,4013 Mobil - 1,713,447,8741

From: Walt Glover Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 4:41 PM To: Matt Oehler Subject: BE-7 sds


### First draft attempt.

Walt

BE-7 sds.pdf



### HESI301695Walt Glover Halliburton Production Enhancement 10200 Bellaire BIvd Houston, TX 77072 Office: 281-575-4727 Cell: 281-224-3704



### HESI301696

## Copyrighted page/s removed.

Please contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view this document.

Address: 1301 Constitution Ave, NW Room 3334 Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: 202-566-1744

Fax: 202-566- 9744

Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Orlando Carter,
Plaintiff(s),
Case Number: 1:18cv400
vs.
Judge Susan J. Dlott
Commissioner Charles Furmon, et al.,
Defendant(s).
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on December 18, 2018 (Doc. 38), to whom this case was
referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and
that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 2, 2019,
hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the three motions (Docs. 21, 22, and 23) are DENIED AS MOOT without

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Ata, 1. Nt,

Judge Susan J. Qlott
United States District Court
**Exhibit
        23(ii)**
 
  
 
 **Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
 
   *To
        the Board of Directors*
 *General
        Electric Capital Services, Inc.:*
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
        33-7348) on Form S-3 of General Electric Capital Services, Inc., of our report
        dated February 10, 2006, except as to the restatement discussed in note 1
        to the
        consolidated financial statements which is as of January 19, 2007, relating
        to
        the statement of financial position of General Electric Capital Services,
        Inc.
        and consolidated affiliates as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related
        statements of earnings, changes in shareowner’s equity and cash flows for each
        of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and related
        schedule and our report dated February 10, 2006, except as to the second,
        third
        and fourth paragraphs of Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over
        Financial Reporting (as restated), which are as of January 19, 2007, on
        management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
        reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control
        over
        financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the
        December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K/A of General Electric Capital
        Services, Inc.
 
 Our
        report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting expresses our opinion
        that
        General Electric Capital Services, Inc. did not maintain effective internal
        control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 because of the effect
        of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control
        criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that management
        has
        identified and included in its revised assessment the following material
        weakness as of December 31, 2005: a failure to ensure adequately designed
        procedures to designate, with the specificity required by Statement of Financial
        Accounting Standards No. 133, each hedged commercial paper
        transaction.
 
 Our
        report on the consolidated financial statements refers to changes in the
        method
        of accounting in 2004 and 2003 for variable interest entities.
  
 
 /s/
        KPMG
        LLP
 Stamford,
        Connecticut
 January
        19, 2007
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 31, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 31, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0128. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. v. PAMELA PAVESI IN HER CAPACITY AS COURT APPOINTED GUARDIAN AND CUSTODIAN OF BRIAN E. MIKEALS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16C02829