alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================
                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 10-Q
                               (Amendment No. 1)


                                   (MARK ONE)

                 [X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1997

                                       OR

             [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         Commission File Number 0-19635


                               GENTA INCORPORATED
   (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION)

                    Delaware                                   33-0326866
         (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF                    (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
         INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)                  IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)


           3550 General Atomics Court
              San Diego, California                               92121
    (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)                   (ZIP CODE)


                                 (619) 455-2700
              (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)



         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934  during  the  preceding  12 months  (or for such  shorter  period  that the
registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
                                                Yes [X]    No [ ]


         As of October 31, 1997, the  registrant had 4,458,518  shares of common
stock outstanding.


================================================================================


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                  GENTA INCORPORATED
                                  (Registrant)



                                  By:      /s/ Kenneth G. Kasses, Ph.D.
                                           ----------------------------
                                  Name:    Kenneth G. Kasses, Ph.D.
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer




                                  By:      /s/ Robert E. Klem, Ph.D.
                                           -------------------------
                                  Name:    Robert E. Klem, Ph.D.
                                  Title:   Principal Accounting Officer


Date:    November 19, 1997
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it
No. 08-2381 DONNA CUSSON, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v . LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON; and THE FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on January 14, 2010, is amended as follows: On page 31, line 8, change "May 4, 2004" to "May 7, 2004"
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

  

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE

LITTELFUSE, INC. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN

 

This FOURTH AMENDMENT to the LITTELFUSE, INC. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN (the “Plan”) is made by Littelfuse, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of December 31, 2015.

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan consisting of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan Basic Plan Document (the “Basic Plan Document”) and related Adoption Agreement (the “Adoption Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan, pursuant to its authority under Section 6.03(A) of the Basic Plan Document, to expand eligibility to include designated employees of the Mexican branch of a foreign subsidiary of the Company who reside in the United States. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

 

1.     Section 2.01(c) of the Adoption Agreement is amended by deleting subsection (c) in its entirety and substituting therefor the following:

 

“(c)         Specified Employees/Contractors by name, job title or classification: 

 

(i) Beginning January 1, 2015 and each January 1 thereafter, those management Employees with base salaries equal to or greater than $200,000 each year, as modified from time to time by the Employer’s Retirement Plan Committee (or, if none, the Board of Directors of the Employer). 

 

(ii) Beginning on the 2015 effective date of this Amendment and each January 1 thereafter, those management Employees employed by Littelfuse Mexico Manufacturing B.V. – Mexican Branch who are citizens or residents aliens of the United States, reside in the United States and are specifically designated as a Participant by the Chief Legal Officer of the Company, provided, however, such Employee shall solely be eligible for Discretionary Nonelective Contributions under Section 2.03(d) of this Adoption Agreement and no other forms of contributions provided for under the Plan.”

 

2.     Section 2.06(c) of the Adoption Agreement shall be amended to add the following to the end thereof:

 

“For purposes of other Discretionary Nonelective Contributions, the Employer shall have the discretion to specify the allocation conditions, if any, applicable to each such contribution.”

 

 


 

 




 


 

3.     Section 4.02 of the Adoption Agreement shall be amended to select clause (ii) only (for clarification purposes).

 

4.     The provisions of the Plan shall be interpreted consistently with the above changes so as to allow the Company to make contributions on behalf of such designated management employees.

 

5.     Except as specifically set forth above, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Fourth Amendment has been executed on this 29th day of July, 2015.

 

 

	
 
	
LITTELFUSE, INC.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: 
	
/s/ Ryan K. Stafford
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Ryan K. Stafford
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Executive Vice President-Chief Legal & Human Resources Officer
# FILED December 22, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk GLENNA KIDD ) C/A No. 01A01-9808-CV-00413 ) BEDFORD COUNTY Plaintiff-Appellant ) Circuit No. 7894 ) ) v. ) ) ) ANN HAWTHORNE ) ) Defendant-Appellee )

IN THE COURT OF AP PEALS AT NASHVILLE APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BE DFORD COUNTY AT NASHVILL E, TENNESSEE GLENNA KIDD, Appellant P. O. Box 499 1508 Highway

64 West Shelbyville, TN 37162 Pro Se NO BRIEF FIL

ED FOR APPELLEE

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED Houston M. Goddard, Presiding Judge CONCUR: FRANK S, J. McMURR

AY, J.1 We presume by the time of trial in the Circuit Court, possessi o n

of the prope rty had been restored to the Hawtho rnes.

2 O P I N I O N
Goddard, P.J. This suit originat

ed in the Genera

l Sessions Court for B edford County wherein Ann Hawthorne prosecuted an unlawful detainer warrant as to certain rea l estate against Glenna Kidd. Thereafter, Ms. Kidd filed a claim against Ms. Hawthorne and sometime during the proceedings, perhaps after the counter-claim was filed, the parties and the Court tre ated the original Plaintiffs and counter-Defendants as Ann Hawthorne and Ken Hawthorne.

The General Sessions Judge found in favor of the Hawthornes, granted them possession and, as best we understand, a judgment o f $100 for re nt. An appea l was taken t o the Circu it Court w herein the C ircuit Ju dge dismissed the counter-claim and awarded judgment in favor of the Hawthornes against Ms. Kidd in the amount of $1827.13. 1

Ms. Kidd has filed a document styled “Informal Br ief” which does not meet the requirements of Rule 27 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure and advances no issues on appeal. Moreover, there is no transcript or statement of the evidence as to the hearing below. Under such circumstances an appellate court must presume the judgment of the Trial Court is supported by sufficient evidence. J. C. Bradford & Co. v Martin Const. Co. , 576 S.W.3

2d 586 (Tenn.1979) ; Irvin v. City of Clarksville , 767 S.W. 2d 649 (Tenn .App.1988); Daniel v. Metropolitan Government , 696 S.W.2d 8 (Tenn.App.1985).

For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed and the cause remanded for collection of the judgment and costs below. Cost of appeal are adjudg ed agai nst Ms. Kid d an d he r su ret y.

_______________________________ Houston M. Goddard, P.J. CONCUR:

________________________________ Hersc hel P. F ranks, J.

________________________________ Don T. M cMurr ay, J.
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee 

    for the CrossTimbers Royalty Trust: 

 

We are aware that XTO Energy Inc. has incorporated byreference in its Registration Statement Nos. 33-55784 and 333-91460 on Form S-8, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, which includes our report dated April 28, 2004, covering the unaudited interimfinancial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firmwithin the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

April 29, 2004
Thomas E. Batchelder Esq.

International Law & Aviation, LLC

12175 Glacier Highway

Unit E203

Juneau, Alaska 99801

386-689-1474

December 26, 2015,

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington DC 20590

Re: Public Docket No. FAA-2015-1821 Amendment

Dear Sir or Madam,

This amendment to petition Public Dockett No. FAA-2015-1821 is submitted per request by your 

office dated 12-23-15 in regards to an Application for Issuance of Section 333 Exemption of the FAA

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. The original exemption request dated May 20, 2015, was 

sought by Aerial Video & Photography of 9257 Sharon Street Juneau Alaska 99801 (Aerial) and was 

a fast track request based upon Exemption 11204 issued to Build Imagery, LLC. (Build) The original 

petition sought exemption to allow Aerial to operate the DJI Inspire 1 or other aircraft approved for 

commercial operations under Exemption 11204.

Your office has requested that my office either provide documentation related to closed set filming 

operations or proceed with the petition and omit closed set filming. At this time, we request that 

your office omit closed set filming activities from our amended petition and proceed with 

processing of the requested exemption. 

Please do not hesitate to contact my office with any issues or concerns. 

Best regards,

Thomas E. Batchelder Esq.

12175 Glacier Highway

Unit E203

Juneau, Alaska 99801

386-689-1474
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-CR-021 

-vs- Judge Thomas M. Rose 

CHARLES MOORE, III, 

 Defendant. 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT=S MOTION 

 FOR BOND (DOCS. 17, 20) 

 

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Defendant’s Motion for Bond (doc. 17) and 

the Government’s Opposition to said Motion (doc. 18). 

The Court heard said Motion on the record on March 12, 2018, allowing both Defendant 

and the Government to supplement their arguments. 

Based upon these arguments presented, the Court finds Defendant has failed to overcome 

the presumption that applies to this case that no combination of conditions will reasonably assure 

his appearance or the safety of the community. As pointed out by the Government the Grand Jury 

found probable cause to believe Defendant committed a drug offense which carries a maximum 

sentence of life imprisonment. The evidence against Defendant is purportedly compelling and 

includes admissions as to his possession with intent to distribute vast quantities of drugs. 

Based upon these presentations, the Court finds Defendant has failed to overcome the 

presumption of detention in this case. Defendant’s Motion for Bond (doc. 17) including the 

supplemental documents (doc. 20) is DENIED. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Thomas M. Rose 

Date: April 4, 2018 ___________________________________ 

 Thomas M. Rose, Judge 

 United States District Court
```

[Federal Register: April 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 68)]
[Notices]               
[Page 18252]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09ap10-140]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6951]

 
Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Through African Eyes: The European in African Art, 
1500--Present''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Through African Eyes: The European in 
African Art, 1500--Present,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The 
object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner 
or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit object at the Detroit Institute of Arts, Detroit, Michigan, 
from on or about April 18, 2010, until on or about August 8, 2010, at 
the Nelson Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, Missouri, from on or 
about September 25, 2010, to on or about January 8, 2011, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the exhibit object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 2, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-8142 Filed 4-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>








EXHIBIT 27 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (FDS)




<ARTICLE>                     5




<MULTIPLIER>                                          1000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                              6,148
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     240,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  307,206
<PP&E>                                            554,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,034,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             246,052    
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        475,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,034,484
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  513,229
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     480,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (256)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    29,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                       12,167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                17,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       17,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.65




        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Microware Systems Corporation:

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-11061, 333-67253 and 333-33622) on Form S-8 of Microware
Systems Corporation of our report dated April 28, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Microware Systems Corporation and subsidiaries as
of March 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2000, which report appears in the March 31,
2000 Annual Report on Form 10K of Microware Systems Corporation.


                                                                        KPMG LLP


Des Moines, Iowa
June 28, 2000
#### York *v.*State.

Cr. 3820

Opinion delivered October 10, 1932.

*J. S. McConnell*and *Geo. R. Steel,*for appellant.

*Hal L. Norwood,*Attorney General, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The bill of exceptions in the instant case is identical with the one held insufficient in the case of *Ward*v. *State,*135 Ark. 259, 204 S. W. 971. In this *261case, as in that the hill of exceptions was signed by the prosecuting attorney and counsel for appellant, but had not been submitted to nor approved by the trial judge. The appellant in each case had been convicted of a felony. It was there held that it is necessary that a bill of exceptions in a case where defendant has been convicted of a felony be signed by the trial judge, and that the bill of exceptions did not become a part of the record until it was so signed.

The errors complained of in the instant case, like those in the Ward case, *supra,*are such as must be brought into the record by a proper bill of exceptions, and, as no error appears in the absence of a bill of exceptions, the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted December 14, 2006

Decided December 21, 2006 Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge No. 04-2196 U NITED S TATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff-Appellee , v. P EDRO H ERRERA , Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 02 CR 729-2 David H. Coar, Judge

. O R D E R Pedro Herrera was convicted of conspira cy and attempted possession of cocaine and heroin and was sentenced to 360 months’ imprisonment. United States v. Carrillo , 435 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2006). On appeal, we ordered a limited remand in light of our decision in United States v. Paladino , 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005). Carrillo , 435 F.3d at 785. The district court has responded that he would have imposed the same sentence in this case had the Guidelines been advisory instead of mandatory. We invited the parties to file arguments addressing the district court’s response but the deadline has passed without a response fromHerrera. Herrera’s sentence of 360 months’ imprisonment is within the Guidelin es range. We see no reason to say that this sentence is unreasonable and therefore the judgment is AFFIRMED . UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Darrel Wayne Brown v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00440

- CR

Trial court case number: 1487463

Trial court: 228th District Court of Harris Count y

A ppellee, the State of Texas, has requested a n extension of time in which to file its brief.

Appellee ’ s motion is granted. Appellee ’ s brief is due April 27, 2020.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Julie Countiss

________________ Acti ng individually

Date: A p ril 2, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,390,415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  191,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,598,325
<PP&E>                                         172,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,657,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          181,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,408
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,770,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,657,152
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,621,085
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,905,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                110,245
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   927,955
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26



</TABLE>