# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 0229 V (not to be published)

TAMMY MORTON WEBB

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: November 3, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Attorney’s Fees and Costs

B r idget Candace McCullough , Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for P etitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY ’ S FEES AND COSTS 1

On February 11, 2019

, Tammy Morton Webb filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, ( the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to

Vaccine Administration as a result of her October 2, 2017 influneza vaccination. ( Petition

at 1 )

. On May 21, 2020

, a decision was issued awarding compensation to P etitioner based

on the Respondent ’ s proffer

. (ECF No. 27 )

.

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated July 1, 2020

, (ECF No. 34 ) , requesting a total award of $ 11,174.95 (representing $ 10,210.90 in fees
and $ 964.05 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9 Petitioner filed a signed

statement indicating that she incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses. (ECF No. 31 )

.

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.2 Respondent reacted to the motion on July 8, 2020 indicating that he is satisfied that the
statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case and

defers to the Court’s discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. (ECF No 35).
Petitioner did not file a reply thereafte r.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my experience , the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. §
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney ’ s fees and costs. I

award a total of $ 11,174.95 (representing $ 10,210.90 in fees and $ 964.05 in costs) as a
lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel

. In
the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court),
the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.