P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 51133 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. M A R C O S A N T O N IO H E R N A N D E Z -H E R N A N D E Z , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e W est ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8 - CR- 1 1 6 1 - ALL B e fo r e D AV IS , S M IT H , a n dD E N N IS , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R IA M: * M arcos A n t on i o H erna n dez-H erna n dez ap pea l s t h e 70-m on t h sentence i m pos ed f

oll ow i ng hi s gui l t y pl ea c onvi c t i on f oril l egalr ee nt r y. H e a ss er t s t hat t h e d ist ri ctcourterr on eou sly cal cul ated his adv i sory s en t en ci n g gu i del i n es ran ge becau se iti n creased hi s base of fen se l evelan d h i s c ri m i n alhi st ory sc ore basedon a N ew M exi co s t ate c ou rtconvi ct i on of robbery t h at w as com m i t t ed w hen he w as 15 y ear s ol d. H e c ont ends al sot hatt he s ent enc e im p os ed w as United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

1, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 51133

2 subs t a n tively unre as onabl e b ec ause t he di st r i c tc our tdi d notc ons i dert he 18 U . S . C . § 3553 ( a) fact ors properl y an d i m poseda si gn i f i can tup w ard va ri an ce. B ec ause H er nandez- H er nandez obj ec t ed t o the o f fens e l eve land c r i m i nal hi st ory en h anc e m e nt s i n t he di s t r i c tc o ur t , o urr e vi e w o f hi s c hall e nge s t o t he e n h a n c e m e n ts is d e n o v o . S eeUn itedS ta tes v. Klein , 543 F . 3d206 , 213 ( 5th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ), cer t . den i ed , 129 S . C t . 138 4 ( 200 9) . W e m u stdeci de w h et h er th e di st ri ct court com m i t t ed an y p ro ce d u ra lerr ors, “ such as fai l i n g t o cal cul ate (or i m pro p e r l y c a l c ul a t i ng) t he Gui d e l i ne s r a ng e , t r e a t i ng t he Gui d e l i ne s as m an da t ory, fai l i n g t o consi der t h e § 355 3( a) fact ors, sel ect i n g a sentence based o n c le a r ly e r r o n e o u s fa c ts , o rfa ilin gto a d e q u a te lye x p la in th e ch o s e n s e n te n c e .” G allv. Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 1 2 8 S . C t. 5 8 6 , 5 9 4 , 5 9 7 (2 0 0 7 ). In accor da n ce w i t h U . S . S . G . § 2L 1. 2, t h e di st ri ctcourtproperl y i n creased H ern a n d e z- H erna n dez’ s of fen se l evelbased on hi s N ew M exi co r obbery convic t i on b ecau se h e w as su bj ectto a du l tp en al t i es an d w as sentenced to t h ree y e a r s o f im p r is o n m e n t. S ee als o § 2L1. 2, c om m ent . (n. 1(A) (iv) ) . Add i t i onal l y, U .S .S .G . § 4A 1 .2 a u th o r iz e dth e a d d itio n o f th r e e cr im in a l h is to r yp o in ts . S ee § 4A 1. 2, com m en t . (n . 7) . H er nand e z- H erna n dez did not present an y i n f orm ati on t o r ebutt he ac c urac y o f t he i nf or m at i on i n t he pr es ent enc e r epo r t ; ac c or di ngl y, th e d is tr ic t co u r t d idn o t e r rinre ly in go n th a t in fo r m a tio n . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. F ord , 5 5 8 F . 3 d3 7 1 , 3 7 7 ( 5 t h Ci r . 2 0 0 9 ) . He r n a n d e z - He r n a n d e z h a s n o ts h o wn t hatt he di s t r i c tc o ur tcom m i t t e d p r o c e dur ale r r o ri n t he a ppli c at i o n o f t he G u id e lin e s . S eeKlein , 543 F. 3d at213. M oreover, t h e rec ord dem on st rat es t h at even i f t h e di st ri ctcourtha d erred bya p p l y i n gt h e i n c r e a s e s , t h e a l l e g e de r r o rwo u l dn o tr e q u i r e r e v e r s a l ; t he r e c o r d s ho w s t hatt he di s t r i c tc o ur ti nt e nde d t o a nd d i d i m po s e av ali d, n o n g u id e lin e s , a lte r n a tiv e s e n te n c e . S eeUn itedS ta tes v. B o n illa , 524 F. 3d 647, 6 5 6 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ), cer t . den i ed , 1 29 S. Ct . 9 04 ( 20 09 ) . A f t e ri tc o ns i de r e d the nat ur e a nd c i r c um s t anc e s o f t he o f fe ns e a nd H e r nand e z ’ s cr i m i nalhi s t o r y andN o. 08- 51133

3 c h a r a c te r is tic s , th e d is tr ic t c o u r t e x p la in e dth a t a 7 0 - m o n t h s e n te n c e w a s fa ir a n dre a s o n a b le . T h e d is tr ic t c o u r t t h u s co n s id e r e dth e § 3 5 5 3 (a) fa c to r s . AF F I RMED.