alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Donald R. Sellers, Chief Executive Officer of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
on my knowledge:

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

| |                                                                                                                                                            
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.

|                       |  |                                          
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Donald R. Sellers                    
|                       |  |                                          
|                       |  | Donald R. Sellers
Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Richard A. Waldron, Chief Financial Officer of SciClone Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which
this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



| |                                                                                                                                                            
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.

|      |  |             |  |                        
|----- |  | ----------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | May 9, 2003 |  | /s/ Richard A. Waldron 
|      |  |             |  |                        
|      |  |             |  | Richard A. Waldron     
|      |  |             |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by SciClone
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99 (b)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2002, I, J. Robert Buchanan, Treasurer (Chief Financial
Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

        (2)the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.


/s/ J. Robert Buchanan
---------------------------
J. Robert Buchanan
Treasurer
(Chief Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

KAILA DIETZ, 

 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-3 

 vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

 Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman 

 Defendant. 

AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). For good cause shown, Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. #20) is GRANTED. 

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 

#17), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections 

have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has 

expired, the Court ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #17) is ADOPTED in full; 

2. The Commissioner’s non-disability determination is REVERSED; 

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence 

of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an immediate award of benefits; and 

4. An amended judgment entry issue and this case remain terminated on the docket 

of this Court. 

Date: May 21, 2019 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 ____________________________________ 

 THOMAS M. ROSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 02, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 02, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0220. LAMAR LEWIS STRICKLAND v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 92CR0236
EXHIBIT 23.3



Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-144870, 333-176733, 333-183882 and 333-205836) and Form
S-3 (File No. 333-200422) of Lakeland Industries, Inc. of our report dated April 18, 2016, relating to our audit of the financial
statements of Weifang Lakeland Safety Products Co., Ltd., which report appears in Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Lakeland Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016.





|/s/ Shanghai Mazars Certified Public Accountants | 
|------------------------------------------------ | 
|Shanghai Mazars Certified Public Accountants     | 
|Shanghai, China                                  | 
|March 10, 2017                                   |
August 7, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF C.N.S AND C.D.S., CHILDREN

NO. 14-14-00301-CV

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed 

April 1, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the 

record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: November 17, 2006                /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Eduardo Rodriguez (Chief
                                        Executive Officer and Chief
                                        Financial Office)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, that:

     -   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
         15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     -   the information contained in the report fairly presents, on all
         material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
         operations.

/s/ John J. Remaley
John J. Remaley, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 28, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 544 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 544

   Supporting the designation of March 2020 as ``National Colorectal 
                       Cancer Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2020

    Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Menendez) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Supporting the designation of March 2020 as ``National Colorectal 
                       Cancer Awareness Month''.

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men 
        and women combined in the United States;
Whereas it is estimated that, in 2020, 147,950 individuals in the United States 
        will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and approximately 53,200 
        individuals will die from the disease;
Whereas colorectal cancer is one of the most preventable forms of cancer because 
        screening tests can allow for the discovery and removal of polyps before 
        the polyps become cancerous;
Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, which is when the 
        disease is most treatable;
Whereas the Secretary of Health and Human Services estimates that if every 
        individual 50 years of age or older had regular screening tests, as many 
        as 60 percent of deaths from colorectal cancer could be prevented;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized colorectal cancer 
        is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all diagnoses occur at this stage;
Whereas screening tests can reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer and 
        mortality, but approximately 1 in 3 adults between 50 and 75 years of 
        age are not current with recommended colorectal cancer screening;
Whereas educational efforts can help inform the public on methods to prevent and 
        screen for, as well as detect early symptoms of, colorectal cancer; and
Whereas public awareness and educational campaigns on colorectal cancer 
        prevention, screening, and symptoms are held during the month of March 
        each year: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports--
                    (A) the designation of March 2020 as ``National 
                Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month''; and
                    (B) the goals and ideals of National Colorectal 
                Cancer Awareness Month; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month with appropriate 
        awareness and educational activities.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 21.01
 Jurisdiction of Incorporation orSubsidiary Name
    
    OrganizationSilicon Image International LLC
    
    DelawareHDMI Licensing, LLC
    
    DelawareSimplay Labs, LLC
    
    DelawareSilicon Image, Cayman Islands Limited
    
    Cayman IslandsSilicon Image Electronics Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaSilicon Image Japan KK
    
    JapanSilicon Image UK Limited
    
    United KingdomSilicon Image International B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsSilicon Image Cooperatie U.A.
    
    The NetherlandsSilicon Image, GmbH
    
    GermanySilicon Image Tasarim Merkezi Ticaret Limited
    
    TurkeyCMD Technology Inc.
    
    CaliforniaDVDO, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaZillion Technologies, LLC
    
    CaliforniaFairview, LLC
    
    DelawareSlice Acquisition Corp.
    
    DelawareTWN Acquisition Corp.
    
    Delaware
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case: 3:18-cv-00148-WHR Doc #: 3 Filed: 05/04/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 145
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case: 3:18-cv-00148-WHR Doc #: 3 Filed: 05/04/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 146
# Euroopa Liidu C 15I/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 015I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 59. köide16. jaanuar 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 015I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

59. köide16. jaanuar 2016

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Nõukogu |
| 2016/C 015I/01 | Teave nõukogu määruse (EL) 2015/1861 (millega muudetakse määrust (EL) nr 267/2012, milles käsitletakse Iraani vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid) ja nõukogu rakendusmääruse (EL) 2015/1862 (millega rakendatakse määrust (EL) nr 267/2012, milles käsitletakse Iraani vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid) kohaldamise kuupäeva kohta | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Nõukogu

2016/C 015I/01

Teave nõukogu määruse (EL) 2015/1861 (millega muudetakse määrust (EL) nr 267/2012, milles käsitletakse Iraani vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid) ja nõukogu rakendusmääruse (EL) 2015/1862 (millega rakendatakse määrust (EL) nr 267/2012, milles käsitletakse Iraani vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid) kohaldamise kuupäeva kohta

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Nõukogu

| 16.1.2016 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2016

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 15/1

---

Teave nõukogu määruse (EL) 2015/1861 (millega muudetakse määrust (EL) nr 267/2012, milles käsitletakse Iraani vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid) ja nõukogu rakendusmääruse (EL) 2015/1862 (millega rakendatakse määrust (EL) nr 267/2012, milles käsitletakse Iraani vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid) kohaldamise kuupäeva kohta

(2016/C 15 I/01)

Nõukogu määrus (EL) 2015/1861 (1) ja nõukogu rakendusmäärus (EL) 2015/1862 (2) jõustusid 19. oktoobril 2015.

Kooskõlas nii määruse (EL) 2015/1861 kui ka rakendusmääruse (EL) 2015/1862 artikli 2 teise lõiguga kohaldatakse neid määruseid kuupäevast, millele on osutatud nõukogu otsuse (ÜVJP) 2015/1863 (3) artikli 2 teises lõigus, st otsuse (ÜVJP) 2015/1863 kohaldamise kuupäevast.

Otsuses (ÜVJP) 2016/37 (4) märkis nõukogu, et otsuse (ÜVJP) 2015/1863 kohaldamise tingimused on täidetud, ning otsustas vastavalt, et otsust (ÜVJP) 2015/1863 kohaldatakse alates 16. jaanuarist 2016. Seega kohaldatakse ka määrust (EL) 2015/1861 ja rakendusmäärust (EL) 2015/1862 alates 16. jaanuarist 2016.

---

(1)  ELT L 274, 18.10.2015, lk 1.

(2)  ELT L 274, 18.10.2015, lk 161.

(3)  Nõukogu 18. oktoobri 2015. aasta otsus (ÜVJP) 2015/1863, millega muudetakse otsust 2010/413/ÜVJP, mis käsitleb Iraani vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid (ELT L 274, 18.10.2015, lk 174).

(4)  Nõukogu 16. jaanuari 2016. aasta otsus (ÜVJP) 2016/37, mis käsitleb otsuse (ÜVJP) 2015/1863 (millega muudetakse otsust 2010/413/ÜVJP (mis käsitleb Iraani vastu suunatud piiravaid meetmeid) kohaldamise kuupäeva) (ELT L 11 I, 16.1.2016, lk 1).

---
#### State *v.*Mills.

Opinion delivered September 24, 1923.

CRIMINAL law — RIGHT OP APPEAL BY state. — The statutes allowing ■ ’ ah appeal by the State in cases in which the liberty of the .accused is involved, as when the punishment may involve imprisonment, in which case there can be no reversal, do not contemplate an appeal by the State where the court sitting as a jury, after the State’s evidence was in, made a general finding that defendant was not guilty; the appeal being' allowed only to obtain a decision on a point of law important to the correct and uniform administration of the criminal laws.

Appeal from Phillips Circuit Court; *E. D. Robertson,*Judge; appeal

dismissed.

*J. S. Utley,*Attorney 'General; *John L. Garter, W. T. Hammock*and *Barden Moose,*Assistants, for appellant. ■ , , .

*W. G. Dinning,*for appellee.

Hart, J.

Information was filed by the deputy prosecuting- attorney in the municipal court in the city of Helena charging Willie Mills with the-crime of storing alcoholic liquors, in violation of § 6169 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest.'

The punishment prescribed for violation of the statute is' by fine or imprisonment in the county jail, or by both, in the discretion of the court or jury trying the case. Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 6183.

The defendant was convicted in the municipal court, and appealed to the circuit court. Theré he was tried' before the circuit court sitting as a jury, and, aftdr hearing the evidence adduced by the State, the court made a g-eneral finding that the defendant was not guilty, and judgment was entered discharging him. The State, by its prosecuting attorney, then prayed an appeal to this court.

The object of the statute allowing the State to appeal in criminal cases is to obtain a decision of the Supreme Court where it is important to the correct and uniform administration of the criminal laws.* In cases *195.where-the punishment prescribed by the statute is by imprisonment, or by- fine and imprisonment, the court cannot direct a verdict of guilty, although it may deem the evidence for the State to be uncontradicted. *Roberts*v. *State,*84 Ark. 564.

In the application of the principle this court has held that the statute does not contemplate an appeal in a case like this, in which the only error alleged is that the court incorrectly decided that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a submission of the issue to the jury. *State*v. *Smith,*94 Ark. 368, and *State*v. *Spear and Boyce,*123 Ark. 449.

The reason given is that, where the appeal is only taken from the ruling of the trial court that all the.evidence was not sufficient to convict the defendant, the ruling is rather upon the sufficiency of the testimony than upon a question of law.

The State’s appeal is therefore dismissed.

*

 See Crawford *&*Moses’ Dig., §§ 3410, 8425