alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

172) ll-E-23 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:50:59 AM Sheet 172 of 276 
P.2_ 

{Ll— . 

TYfE 

Q VISIT 

Location of Vftit/Cenfafmici. 

CONVERSATION f n-E-23 

• CONFERENCE 

iV &7 

^TELEPHONE 

^INCOMIN G 

• OUTGOING 

NAME OP POIS0N( » CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT 

WITH YOU r^o V I6- i T "v : K o-r-v-j 

JJM[ C V i lA ir x j / / > ..i i wo A11 v.. 

ORGANIZATION (Omei. 

tie.) 

•»«.. burtatu. TELETHONS NO: 

SUBJECT 

w £ f e o p.? •,\ V'Q-J I > ^4 V*»v 

SOL 

NAME/SVI 

^•^l 

J; !XZL 

SUMMARY 

Vij. fno iii i t~^. f t^ C*V.> •£.., | \V . 4- » l 

CA 

iX w» ^ "frr ///7/B^ 

( ^»* P J: iu .) .* c i^L 

V'Q. <-\ •••. ru,/J«A ^yi\fl y 1~fa_ •HMo.'fgy? W6Y<^e> /^rCt"g-<(vi 

•VhPKl?]' V4 r M .-- J "-'-y ^.nit LL « 'V KS.-.AX'V- Q^^<->r*-qT~ '/^^/^•^l^^^7^<^vJ^t J' 

* / T 'Tf/\3w /? e , yjfc" v-,^AJL, ••? Y_ W'& rC^) wev»- • 

I/ W^-voTtp o u".-v^ r. ^--T-yHy Tfr^-^Ti^fe- ir«y(.<^a^vt^ i^rf-vyAft-'-r/ cUrrk c.io 

jidii ( t oJ ^ G--it j H_S,?i-o*. D*^ ^ [,^-foy - J"v/yWio4.ov/avLa-A/ 

3/ C*st ^ / ^ ;o. ooo I Coj\'*t Cj?yS4J\ YyL&~r>*-£ {ojR ^ ^2^-^0 0,000 

*// /^ay , ConJ't'iljV j et^v~**a WOv/ k OVs^l l *-/ ~ ••» t-^ -V f •••*>- ^2L & - 3 -

.; 9 ^ M J4-v-«i. w l 

M u^j t

 <:<ff^\{y j n r. v*4tSV.. , 

ACTION REQUIRED 

NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVEftSA' 

^..Va-A ICL( 

BATE a 

^ 7 

ACTION TAKEN 

SaOHATURf TITLE OATt 

som-ioi USOPO-IM S <a461.17S/*0:02 CONVERSATION RECORD i n n 

_J
**Exhibit 23**
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 333-07621) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1995 Long-Term StockIncentive Plan and the LCA-Vision Inc. Directors’ Nondiscretionary Stock OptionPlan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74485) pertaining tothe LCA-Vision Inc. 1998 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, of our report datedFebruary 13, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofLCA-Vision Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
#### People v Willoughby,

No. 90862;

Court of Appeals No. 118949.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

JENNETTE WESTFALL, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:18-cv-28 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

(by full consent of the parties) 

DECISION AND ENTRY 

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of 

Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. 

(Doc. #14). Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees 

in the amount of $3,200.00, and no costs, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and 

all claims Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. Prior to Plaintiff 

filing an EAJA petition, the parties jointly reached a resolution to settle EAJA fees in 

this case. This Stipulation represents a compromise on disputed positions and is not 

intended to set precedent for, or a representation of, any specific hourly rate or total 

number of hours. 

The award of attorney fees will satisfy all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs, and 

expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and 

not her attorney, and can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the 
2

United States under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). 

After the Court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that 

Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the 

award be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly 

signed by Plaintiff and counsel. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees 

under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #14) is accepted 

and Defendant shall pay Plaintiff=s attorney fees, costs, and 

expenses in the total amount of $3,200.00; 

2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this 

Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such 

pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award 

directly to Plaintiff=s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment 

signed by Plaintiff and counsel; and 

3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: January 30, 2020 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington

 United States Magistrate Judge
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7086

BILAL A. AL-HAQQ, Michael Dion McFadden, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

ASSOCIATE WARDEN JOSEPH CANNING, in his individual and official 

capacity; WARDEN EVONNE WILLINGHAM, in her individual and official 

capacity; ASSOCIATE WARDEN ELAINE FREEMAN, in her individual and 

official capacity; MAJOR JONATHAN WILLIAMS, in his individual and official 

capacity; CAPTAIN VALERIE THOMAS, in her individual and official capacity; 

DHO DEDRIC WILLIAMS, in his individual and official capacity; SERGEANT 

MICHAEL HARRIS, in his individual and official capacity; IGC JENNIFER 

FRANKLIN, in her individual and official capacity, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (2:20-cv-03233-DCC) 

Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2024

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7086 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Bilal A. Al-Haqq, Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, Evan Michael Sobocinski, HOOD 

LAW FIRM, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7086 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM: 

Bilal A. Al-Haqq seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying his summary judgment motion, and 

granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ summary judgment motion filed in his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

The district court entered its order on September 1, 2022. Al-Haqq filed the notice 

of appeal on October 13, 2023.*

 Because Al-Haqq failed to file a timely notice of appeal 

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date Al-Haqq could have delivered the notice to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7086 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
Exhibit 99.1





                                 CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the
  "Report") of Western Feed Mills, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter
  ended September 30, 2003, I Fred W. Raybourn, Chief Executive Officer and
  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

  (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  the Company.


Dated: November 14, 2003

                                      /s/ Fred W. Raybourn
                                      Fred W. Raybourn
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      Western Feed Mills, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AcornEnergy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Michael Barth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1.          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4425 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4425

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, as the ``Martin G. `Marty' 
                          Mahar Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARTIN G. ``MARTY'' MAHAR POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Martin G. `Marty' Mahar Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Martin G. 
`Marty' Mahar Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 22, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
ii

Table of Contents 

Section Page 

 

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................. 1 

 

2.0 Visibility Assessment Methodology....................................................... 6 

 2.1 Modeling Methodology ............................................................ 6 

 2.2 Meteorological Model.............................................................. 6 

 2.3 Dispersion Model.................................................................... 7 

 2.4 Modeled Post-Processing......................................................... 7

 2.5 Modeled Sources................................................................... 8 

 2.6 Baseline Analysis................................................................... 8 

Tables 

 

2-1 Source Parameters........................................................................... 8 

2-2 Baseline Emission Rates................................................................... 8 

2-3 Baseline Modeling Results................................................................. 9 

Figures 

 

1-1 Facility Location Map........................................................................ 3 

1-2 Facility Site Map.............................................................................. 4 

1-3 Wilderness Areas with respect to FMC Granger Facility........................... 5 

 

 

Appendix 

 

A BART Visibility Impact Analysis – Electronic Files
EXHIBIT 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       PALOMAR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


        PALOMAR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Company") does hereby certify  pursuant to Section 103(f) thereof that:
  
                FIRST:  The  Company,  then  known  as  Dynamed,  Inc.,  filed a
        Certificate of  Incorporation  with the Office of the Secretary of State
        of the State of Delaware (the "Secretary of State") on August 16, 1991.

                SECOND: The Certificate of Incorporation set forth an inaccurate
        record of the corporate action referred to therein.

                THIRD: The Certificate of Incorporation  inaccurately  reflected
        the text of  Article  FOURTH  thereof  in that the  relevant  portion of
        Article FOURTH inaccurately states as follows:

                Additional  designations and powers,  the rights and preferences
                and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions with respect
                to each class of stock of the corporation shall be as determined
                by the Board of Directors from time to time.

                FOURTH: The correct text of Article FOURTH of the Certificate of
        Incorporation  intended to be effected by this Certificate of Correction
        is as follows:

                Additional  designations and powers,  the rights and preferences
                and the qualifications,  limitation or restrictions with respect
                to each series of such class of stock of the  Corporation  shall
                be as determined by the Board of Directors from time to time.


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Palomar Medical  Technologies,  Inc. has caused
this Certificate of Correction to be signed by its duly authorized  officer this
day of September, 1997.

                                              PALOMAR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



                                              By:        /s/ Louis P. Valente
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Louis P. Valente
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                         and President

                                       2
#### Henry C. Burnham v. Clinton Van Gelder.

*Practice in supreme court: Assignment of errors.*An assignment of errors is required where a *certiorari*from the circuit to a justice of the peace is brought up on ;writ of error.

*Heard and decided October 19.*

Error to Allegan Circuit.

Motion to dismiss for want of an assignment of errors. This writ of error was brought to review the proceedings of the court below on a *certiorari*from that court to a justice of the peace. No assignment of. errors was filed, the counsel for plaintiff in error relying upon the assignment thereof in the affidavit for *certiorari*as sufficient.

*Stafford & Padgham*and *Hoyt Post,*for the motion.

*Jacob V. Rogers, contra.*

The Couet

held that an assignment of errors was essential.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment
No. 1, of Premier Exhibitions, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Stephen Couture
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner 

v.

TIMOTHY NICHOLAS TOMASIC

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2962 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 134 DB 2021

Attorney Registration No. 205126

(Allegheny County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2023, upon consideration of Respondent’s

response to this Court’s Rule to Show Cause, the Rule is made absolute. It is ordered 

that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by 

this Court, see Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(2);

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217;

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County shall 

enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent’s 

clients or fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g); and

4. All financial institutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall freeze 

such accounts pending further action by a court of appropriate jurisdiction.
Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order and to 

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 

208(f)(6) are specifically preserved.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline. See Pa.R.D.E. 402(c)(3) 

(providing an exception to the confidentiality requirement of Rule 402 when “an order of 

temporary suspension from the practice of law is entered by the Court pursuant to 

Enforcement Rule 208(f)”).
---



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
		THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying
		Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q
		for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Raymond P.
		Warrell, Jr., M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
		to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
		Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
			 The Report fully complies with the
				  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
			 The information contained in the
				  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
				  results of operations of the Company.




Date:
			 August 7, 2007/s/ RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR.,
				  M.D.*Name:
			 Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.Title:
			 Chairman and Chief Executive
				  Officer




* A signed original of this written
		statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genta Incorporated and
		will be retained by Genta Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
		Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











---
ITEM 7 - EXHIBIT.
   
 CEO/CFO CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
   
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certify in their capacity as officers of Subjex Corporation. (the "Company") that (a) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31st 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.
 
 
 
 By /s/ Andrew HyderAndrew Hyder, CEO (acting CFO)
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(Registration Nos. 333-04290, 333-52907, 333-83007, 333-55470, 333-65502, 333-95965 and 333-96969)of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 2, 2006 relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP