alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 277 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4626 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Received 

FEBRUARY 26, 2010 

Read the first time 

MARCH 1, 2010 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To restore the application of the Federal antitrust laws to 

the business of health insurance to protect competition 

and consumers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance In5 dustry Fair Competition Act’’. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4626 PCS 

1 SEC. 2. RESTORING THE APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST 

2 LAWS TO HEALTH SECTOR INSURERS. 

3 (a) AMENDMENT TO MCCARRAN-FERGUSON ACT.— 

4 Section 3 of the Act of March 9, 1945 (15 U.S.C. 1013), 

5 commonly known as the McCarran-Ferguson Act, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(c) Nothing contained in this Act shall modify, im8 pair, or supersede the operation of any of the antitrust 

9 laws with respect to the business of health insurance. For 

10 purposes of the preceding sentence, the term ‘antitrust 

11 laws’ has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the 

12 first section of the Clayton Act, except that such term in13 cludes section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to 

14 the extent that such section 5 applies to unfair methods 

15 of competition.’’. 

16 (b) RELATED PROVISION.—For purposes of section 

17 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) 

18 to the extent such section applies to unfair methods of 

19 competition, section 3(c) of the McCarran-Ferguson Act 

20 shall apply with respect to the business of health insurance 

21 without regard to whether such business is carried on for 

22 profit, notwithstanding the definition of ‘‘Corporation’’ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4626 PCS 

1 contained in section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission 

2 Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 24, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 277 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4626 

AN ACT 

To restore the application of the Federal antitrust 

tect competition and consumers. laws to the business of health insurance to proMARCH 1, 2010 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,858,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,000
<PP&E>                                       5,992,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,557,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,350,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,043,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,754,600
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,164,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,350,000
<SALES>                                      1,246,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,345,000
<CGS>                                          124,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,012,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,299,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,299,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Inhibiton Therapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Henry
Fong, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and





(2)         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for
the periods presented in theReport.








/s/ Henry FongHenry
      FongPrincipal
      Executive Officer and
                Principal
      Accounting OfficerJune
      15, 2009








A SIGNED
ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
INHIBITON THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY INHIBITON THERAPEUTICS,
INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
**Exhibit99.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Richard J. Kaplan, as Chief Financial Officer ofDeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies that:

 
|   | (1)    | The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the  period ended September 30, 2002 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the  requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as  amended; and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company.                                                                            |

 

 
| November 12, 2002 | By:    | /s/  Richard  J. Kaplan                                             |   |
|-------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|              | Name:  | Richard J. Kaplan                                                        |
|              | Title: | Senior Vice President, Chief Executive Officer,  Secretary and Treasurer |

 

----
Exhibit D

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-9 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 3142
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

STACIE RAY, et al. 

Plaintiffs, 

v. Case No.: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV 

STEPHANIE MCCLOUD, Director, 

Ohio Department Health, et al., 

Defendants. 

DECLARATION OF DAVID J. CAREY 

(pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746) 

I, David J. Carey, declare as follows: 

1. I am above the age of 18 and reside in Ohio. I have personal knowledge of the 

matters to which I attest. 

2. I am the Senior Staff Attorney of the ACLU of Ohio Foundation (“ACLU of 

Ohio”), and co-counsel of record to the Plaintiffs in the above-styled case. Prior to joining the 

ACLU of Ohio, I was an Associate at Thompson Hine LLP, where I was also co-counsel of record 

to the Plaintiffs in this action. 

3. The ACLU of Ohio is a non-profit organization that relies upon membership and 

contributions, augmented by awards of attorneys’ fees when available, to fund its operations. 

4. I am licensed to practice law in Ohio and New York, and am further licensed to 

practice in the United States District Courts for the Southern District of Ohio, Northern District of 

Ohio, Southern District of New York, Eastern District of New York, and Eastern District of 

Michigan. I am also licensed to practice in the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth and 

Judge: Michael Watson 

Magistrate Judge: Chelsey Vascura 

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-9 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 3143
Ninth Circuits, and in the Supreme Court of the United States. I have been licensed since 2010 in 

New York and 2012 in Ohio. My resume detailing my professional qualifications is attached as 

Exhibit D-1 to this Declaration. 

5. I have invested 82.1 hours in representing Plaintiffs in the above-styled case, which 

includes both my hours spent while with the ACLU of Ohio, and while with Thompson Hine LLP. 

6. I kept contemporaneous time records in the above-styled case in six-minute 

increments. I exercised billing judgment to exclude time that was not reasonably related to the 

successful prosecution of the case and to exclude time for small tasks that did not total at least six 

minutes. Time expended in writing and reading a number of email communications, both written 

and received by me, and short conversations with co-counsel and others, are not included in my 

contemporaneous records. 

7. My contemporaneous time records for tasks performed in the above-styled case are 

reflected in the attached Exhibit D-2 to this Declaration. 

8. My reasonable hourly rate for §1983 litigation is $375.00 per hour. 

9. The lodestar figure for my services, determined by multiplying my reasonable 

hours by my reasonable rate, comes to 82.1*375 = $30,787.5.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on February 1, 2021 in Columbus, OH. 

 /s/ David J. Carey 

David J. Carey 

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-9 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 3144
<PAGE>




FRONTIER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.        2000 FORM 10-K                 EXHIBIT 12


                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                         Year Ended December 31
                                                      --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         2000        1999         1998        1997        1996
                                                      ----------  -----------  ----------- ----------   -----------
<S>                                                               <C>           <C>         <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes
   and cumulative effect of change
      in accounting principle                        $(295,033)  $(174,085)   $(90,875)     $45,849      $56,659

Add:
      Minority interest and interest expense            20,546      18,479      11,931       11,842        4,247
      Interest portion of rental expense                   500         500         500          500          371
                                                     ---------    --------      -------     -------      -------
Earnings available for payment of combined
      fixed charges and preferred stock dividends    $(273,987)  $(155,106)   $(78,444)     $58,191      $61,277
                                                     ==========   =========     =======     =======      =======
Combined fixed charges:
      Minority Interest and interest expense         $  20,546   $  18,479     $11,931      $11,842       $4,247
      Interest portion of rental expense                   500         500         500          500          371
                                                     ---------     -------      -------      ------        -----
Total combined fixed charges                         $  21,046   $  18,979     $12,431      $12,342       $4,618
                                                     =========     =======      =======      ======        =====
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges (1)          (13.0)       (8.2)       (6.3)         4.7         13.3
</TABLE>

(1) For purposes of determining this ratio, earnings consist of income before
    federal income taxes, plus fixed charges. Fixed Charges consist of 1)
    minority interest-preferred securities of subsidiary trust, and interest
    expense on short-term debt, 2) amortization of debt issuance costs and 3)
    the portion of rental expense that is representative of the interest factor.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4543 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4543

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2010

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, as the ``Anthony J. 
                    Cortese Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTHONY J. CORTESE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Anthony J. Cortese Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Anthony J. 
Cortese Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20802

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTHA C. RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 96-CR-97-2

- - - - - - - - - -

February 5, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Martha C. Rivera argues that the district court clearly

erred in refusing to reduce her offense level under U.S.S.G. 

§ 3B1.2 based on her minor role in the offense.

We have reviewed the record, including the presentence

report, the briefs, and the transcript of the sentencing hearing,

and find that the district court did not clearly err in refusing
No. 96-20802

- 2 -

to make an adjustment for Rivera’s role in the offense. Rivera

is not entitled to the adjustment merely because she may have 

been less culpable than her co-defendant in the case. See United

States v. Morris, 46 F.3d 410, 426 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115

S. Ct. 2595 (1995).

Rivera’s argument that she is entitled to a reduction under

§ 3B1.2 because she meets the criteria of § 5C1.2 is unsupported. 

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Delfon Blair,
Plaintiff(s),
Case Number: 1:18cv267
vs.
Judge Susan J. Dlott
Hamilton County Justice Center, et al.,
Defendant(s).
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Karen L. Litkovitz filed on April 27, 2018 (Doc. 4), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing
such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 11, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report
and Recommendation.

Accordingly, plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) that any appeal of any order adopting the
Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith. Therefore, plaintiff is DENIED leave
to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the
Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6" Cir. 1999), overruling in part

Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6" Cir. 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

¢ coe

Judge Susan J. Dlott'
United States District\Court
Loan Contract


 


Party A: Hong Kong Huaxia International
Industrial Co.,Ltd.


 


Legal Representative:Liu, Changzhen


 


ID
number: 220502195508150039


 


Party B: Zhang, Fei


 


ID number: 320830197612122075


 


Considering
fixed assets haven’t been put in the right place, Hong
Kong Huaxia decided to return the fixed assets, but the purchase funds have not been returned yet. So Party B agreed to postpone
the repayment of $ 6,000,000 from 30 Jun 2015 to 31 Dec 2015 through consultations.


 


Party
A: Hong Kong Huaxia International Industrial Co., Ltd. (Stamp)


 


Legal
representative signature:


 


Party B: Zhang, Fei


 


Signature:


 


07-01-2015
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 629 

Designating June 2020 as ‘‘Great Outdoors Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. PETERS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. KING, Mr. 

CRAMER, Ms. MCSALLY, Mr. GARDNER, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. RISCH, and 

Mr. CRAPO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 1, 2020 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating June 2020 as ‘‘Great Outdoors Month’’. 

Whereas hundreds of millions of individuals in the United 

States participate in outdoor recreation annually; 

Whereas Congress enacted the Outdoor Recreation Jobs and 

Economic Impact Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–249; 130 

Stat. 999) to assess and analyze the outdoor recreation 

economy of the United States and the effects attributable 

to the outdoor recreation economy on the overall economy 

of the United States; 

Whereas the Outdoor Recreation Satellite Account updated in 

September 2019 by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of 

the Department of Commerce shows that outdoor recreVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:21 Jul 02, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR629.ATS SR629

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 629 ATS 

ation contributed more than $427,000,000,000 of current-dollar gross domestic product to the economy of the 

United States in 2017, comprising approximately 2.2 percent of the current-dollar gross domestic product; 

Whereas the Outdoor Recreation Satellite Account shows 

that, in 2017, the outdoor recreation sector experienced 

faster growth in real gross output, compensation, and 

employment than the overall economy of the United 

States, while also providing 5,200,000 jobs across the 

United States; 

Whereas the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019 (Public 

Law 116–6; 133 Stat. 13) encouraged the Department of 

Commerce to continue its work with the Outdoor Recreation Satellite Account; 

Whereas regular outdoor recreation is associated with economic growth, positive health outcomes, and better quality of life; 

Whereas many outdoor recreation businesses are small businesses, which have been heavily impacted by the COVID– 

19 pandemic; 

Whereas, as a result of the COVID–19 pandemic, many outdoor recreation businesses have experienced decreases in 

sales and have furloughed or laid off employees; 

Whereas outdoor recreation businesses are cornerstones of 

rural communities and outdoor recreation is part of the 

national heritage of the United States; and 

Whereas June 2020 is an appropriate month to designate as 

‘‘Great Outdoors Month’’ to provide an opportunity to 

celebrate the importance of the great outdoors: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 629 ATS 

1 (1) designates June 2020 as ‘‘Great Outdoors 

2 Month’’; and 

3 (2) encourages all individuals in the United 

4 States to responsibly participate in recreation activi5 ties in the great outdoors during June 2020 and 

6 year-round. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4395 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4395

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 22 (legislative day, March 19), 2010

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
     include the Gettysburg Train Station, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GETTYSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK BOUNDARY REVISION.

    Section 1 of the Act titled ``An Act to revise the boundary of the 
Gettysburg National Military Park in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 
and for other purposes'', approved August 17, 1990 (16 U.S.C. 430g-4), 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Additional Land.--In addition to the land identified in 
subsections (a) and (b), the park shall also include the following, as 
depicted on the map titled `Gettysburg National Military Park Proposed 
Boundary Addition', numbered 305/80,045 and dated January 2010:
            ``(1) The land and interests in land commonly known as the 
        `Gettysburg Train Station' and its immediate surroundings in 
        the Borough of Gettysburg.
            ``(2) The land and interests in land located along Plum Run 
        in Cumberland Township.''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF LAND.

    Section 2 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 430g-5) is amended by adding at 
the end of subsection (a) the following: ``The Secretary is also 
authorized to acquire publicly owned property within the area defined 
in section 1(d)(1) by purchase, from willing sellers only, if efforts 
to acquire that property without cost have been exhausted. The 
Secretary may not acquire property within the area defined in section 
1(d) by eminent domain.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```