alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 Plaintiff(s), 

v.

 

 Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD:

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD:

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application.

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-06273-JD Document 17 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 1

Reset Form SEAN MILLER

17-CV-6273-JD

GE HEALTHCARE INC., et al.

Jeremy A. Moseley Jeremy A. Moseley Jeremy A. Moseley Colorado See Exhibit A

Clement L. Glynn

370 17th Street, Suite 4500 

Denver, CO 80202

100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (303) 244-1800 (925) 210-2800 moseley@wtotrial.com cglynn@glynnfinley.com 40831 01/16/18 1/19/18 xxxxxxxxxx

Case: 3:18-cv-00113-TMR Doc #: 19 Filed: 01/19/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 107
FILED IN COURTOFAPPEALS 12thCourtofAppeals District

CATHY S. LUSK,
FILE COPY RE: Case No. 14-0524 DATE: 3/30/2015 COA #: 12-13-00075-CV TC#: 08CV30196 

### STYLE:KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. SHELBY COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT 

### Petitioner's motion for rehearing was this 'day 

### filed in the above styled and numbered case.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS 

### 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702
AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Southern District of Ohio

United States of America

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

v.

Eduard Sarkisov

Case No: 1:18CR20

USM No: 76707-061

Date of Original Judgment: 05/31/2022

Date of Previous Amended Judgment:

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10

and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in

the last judgment issued) of months is reduced to .

(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 05/13/2022 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date:

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Timothy S. Black, United States District Judge 

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

4/25/2024

□ □ 

□ 

Case: 1:18-cr-00020-TSB Doc #: 64 Filed: 04/25/24 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 464
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection
with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report), I, William P.
Keane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (3) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (4) | The information
  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August
  6, 2004          
|--------------------------------
|                                
|/s/ WILLIAM
  P. KEANE          
|                                
|Name:  William P. Keane         
|Title: Chief
  Financial Officer



---

---
March 10, 2015

Mr. Andrew Sprengel

309 Burr Oak Road

Foley MO 63347

Dear Mr. Sprengel :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your February 17 , 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

20 15

- 0384 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the ex emption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Nia Daniels

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<PAGE>



                                                               Exhibit 23



               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

The Board of Directors
Progressive Bank, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-10235, 33-64888 and 333-25931) of Progressive Bank, Inc. Of our
report dated February 2, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Progressive Bank, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which
report appears in the December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Progressive Bank, Inc.

                                                 /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
March 30, 1998
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 1 of 18 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 2 of 18 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 3 of 18 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 4 of 18 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 5 of 18 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 6 of 18 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 7 of 18 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 8 of 18 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 9 of 18 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 10 of 18 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 11 of 18 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 12 of 18 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 13 of 18 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 14 of 18 PAGEID #: 14
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 15 of 18 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 16 of 18 PAGEID #: 16
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 17 of 18 PAGEID #: 17
Case: 3:18-mj-00302-PBS Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 18 of 18 PAGEID #: 18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

CHRISTINA KELLER, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No.: 2:18-cv-341

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

Magistrate Judge Jolson

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 

Defendant. 

 

ORDER

This case is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation issued by the

Magistrate Judge on January 28, 2019, recommending that the Court reverse the Commissioner

of Social Security’s non-disability finding and remand this case to the Commissioner and the

Administrative Law Judge pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g) for further consideration

consistent with the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 16). The time for filing objections to

the Report and Recommendation has passed, and no objections have been filed to the Report and

Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS AND AFFIRMS the Report and

Recommendation. The Commissioner of Social Security’s nondisability finding is hereby

REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner and Administrative Law Judge

pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g). 

The Clerk shall remove Document 16 from the Court’s pending motions list, enter final

judgment and remand this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 98-50285

Summary Calendar

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENIGO PEREZ-ROJO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(DR-97-CR-341-ALL)

February 12, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Benigo Perez-Rojo has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as

counsel; Perez-Rojo has not filed a response. Our independent review of the Anders brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18

L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Accordingly, counsel is excused fromfurtherresponsibilities and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

LAURA B. MORTON, 

Plaintiff, 

 Civil Action 2:18-cv-00445 

 Judge James L. Graham 

 v. Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers 

 

KEVIN JOHN O’BRIEN, et al., 

 Defendants. 

ORDER 

 This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Telephone 

Conference to Discuss Discovery Disputes. (ECF No. 27.) Upon review of the Motion, it is 

hereby GRANTED. The Court, therefore, schedules a Telephonic Status Conference before the 

Undersigned for MAY 15, 2019 at 3:00 P.M. The parties are directed to call 1-877-336-1280, 

enter access code 7598806#, followed by security code 1234#. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: May 8, 2019 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers_________ 

 ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS 

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and will be
retained by Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: February 21, 2006           /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Eduardo Rodriguez Chief Executive Officer,
                                  and Principal Financial Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate~** 

# (!Courtof**§ppeaI~** 

# fortgejf 

# eberaI(!Circuit

ACTIVEVIDEO NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, 

### v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., VERIZON SERVICES CORP., VERIZONVIRGINIA INC., AND 

### VERIZON SOUTH INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.
2012-1479 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District ofVirginia in case no. 10-CV-0248, Judge Raymond A. Jackson. 

### ON MOTION ORDER Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Virginia Inc., and Verizon South Inc. (collectively "Verizon") respond to the court's August 29,2012 order and move unopposed to withdraw the appeal. Upon consideration thereof, Case: 12-1479 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 10/01/2012ACTlVEVIDEO NETWORKS v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS 2 IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to withdraw the appeal is granted. Appeal 2012-1479 is dismissed. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT 

## OCT 01 2012 Date
cc: Michael J. Lyons, Esq. Michael K. Kellogg, Esq. 

### s25 /s/Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Issued As A Mandate: 

### _O_C_T_O_1_2..:.....01.::;...2

__ Case: 12-1479 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 10/01/2012
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24




                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT the undersigned directors and
officers of Zaxis International Inc., a Delaware corporation, does hereby
constitute and appoint Leonard P. Tannen a true and lawful individual in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign his name to Annual
Reports on From 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to any and all amendments, of said
Company, and to cause the same to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said individual full power and authority to do and
perform any act and thing necessary and proper to be done in the premises, as
fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do if personally
present, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said
individuals or any one of them shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                     <C>                                                     <C>
Dated:   March 28, 2002

/s/ Ronald Hanson                           Director, Chairman of the Board                          March 28, 2002
------------------------------------
Ronald Hanson

/s/ James Roberts                           Director                                                 March 28, 2002
------------------------------------
James Roberts

/s/ William Martin                          Director                                                 March 28, 2002
------------------------------------
William Martin

/s/ Steven Ficyk                            Director                                                 March 28, 2002
------------------------------------
Steven Ficyk

/s/ Robert Turner                           Director                                                 March 28, 2002
------------------------------------
Robert Turner

/s/ Leonard P. Tannen                       Director, President & Chief Executive                    March 28, 2002
------------------------------------        Officer, principal financial officer,
Leonard P. Tannen                           principal accounting officer


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

JEFFREY BLEVINS, 

 Plaintiff 

 vs. Civil Action 2:18-cv-364 

 Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

 Magistrate Judge Jolson 

 

CAPITAL ALLIANCE GROUP, 

 Defendant. 

NOTICE

PROCEEDING: PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

PLACE: ROOM 235

Jos. P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 

85 Marconi Blvd., R-235 

Columbus, OH 43215 

DATE/TIME: August 23, 2018 @ 1:00 p.m.

PLEASE NOTE:

1. The report required by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must be filed no fewer than 

seven (7) days prior to the pretrial conference. The required form can be found on the Court’s website, 

www.ohsd.uscourts.gov. Click on AForms@ and then select ARule 26(f) Report of the Parties (Eastern Division 

Only).@

2. The Eastern Division General Order on Pretrial Conference can also be found on the Court’s website. 

3. The conference may be conducted by telephone if all parties agree to participate by telephone. To 

initiate the conference, counsel are directed to join together on one line and then call the Court at 614-719-3470 

or provide the Court with a call-in number. Prior to the scheduled date and time, counsel must inform the Court 

that the conference will be by telephone, and shall designate the person responsible for initiating the call or 

provide the call-in number. 

4. Parties or principals represented by counsel are welcome, but not required, to attend the conference. 

Individuals not represented by counsel must participate. 

 5. Questions or concerns should be directed to chambers at 614-719-3470. 

August 7, 2018 s/Jessica Rector 

 Jessica Rector, Courtroom Deputy to 

 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson 

Case: 2:18-cv-00364-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 11 Filed: 08/07/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 96
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Donald R. Sellers, Chief Executive Officer of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
on my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which
this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



| |                                                                                                                                                            
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.

|      |  |             |  |                        
|----- |  | ----------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | May 9, 2003 |  | /s/ Donald R. Sellers  
|      |  |             |  |                        
|      |  |             |  | Donald R. Sellers      
|      |  |             |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by SciClone
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.