alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF PTEK HOLDINGS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PTEK Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Boland T. Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Boland T. JonesBoland T. Jones Chief Executive Officer PTEK Holdings, Inc. November 14, 2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PTEK Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by PTEK Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1008 

CAF 13-00423 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF TALEEYA M. 

-------------------------------------- 

CAYUGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HUMAN SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;

 

RANESHA S., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAMS HEINL MOODY BUSCHMAN P.C., AUBURN (MARIO J. GUTIERREZ OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

FREDERICK R. WESTPHAL, COUNTY ATTORNEY, AUBURN (DIANE K. DONNELLY OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

SUSAN JAMES, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WATERLOO.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cayuga County (Thomas

G. Leone, J.), entered March 1, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to

Social Services Law § 384-b. The order transferred guardianship and

custody of the subject child to petitioner. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order terminating

her parental rights with respect to her daughter on the ground of

permanent neglect. The mother stipulated to the finding of permanent

neglect, but we reject petitioner’s contention that she thereby waived

her right to appeal Family Court’s determination terminating her

parental rights (cf. Matter of Edelyn S., 62 AD3d 713, 713; see

generally Family Ct Act § 1112). In any event, the evidence supports

the court’s determination that termination of the mother’s parental

rights is in the best interests of the child (see Matter of Alexander

M. [Michael A.M.], 106 AD3d 1524, 1525). The mother’s short-term

progress in her service plan “ ‘was not sufficient to warrant any

further prolongation of the child’s unsettled familial status’ ” (id.

at 1525).

Entered: October 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3137

___________ L. Romeo Hardin, * * Appellant, * * Jeffrey Grafton; Saleem Hamilton; * Maurice Campbell, * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * John Mathes; William Sperflage; John * Emmett; Clarence Raymond Petrie; * Dave DeGrange; David Tadman; Gregg * Colven; Joy Kuper; Mike Cutler; * Unknown Officials; Unknown * Officials, Unknown Officials K9; * Debra Nichols; Lt Dan George; Mike * Petrie; Todd Eaves; Bill Wilke, * * Appellees. * ___________ Appeals from the United States Distirct Court for the Southern No. 07-3140 District of Iowa.

___________ L. Romeo Hardin; Jeffrey Grafton, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Plaintiffs, * *-2- Saleem Hamilton, * * Appellant, * * Maurice Campbell, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * John Mathes; William Sperflage; * John Emmett; Clarence Raymond * Petrie; Dave DeGrange; David * Tadman; Gregg Colven; Joy Kuper; * Mike Cutler; Unknown Officials; * Unknown Officials, Unknown * Officials K9; Debra Nichols; Lt Dan * George; Mike Petrie; Todd Eaves; * Bill Wilke, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 24, 2009 Filed: September 1, 2009

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Ross A. Walters, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of Iowa , to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -3- In these consolidated appeals, Iowainmates L. Romeo Hardin and Saleem Hamilton appeal the district court’s 1 entry of adverse judgment following a jury trial in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In No. 07- 3137, we reject Hardin’s contention that he did not waive his right to proceed before an Article III judge. The record shows that standby counsel signed a document reflecting plaintiffs’ consent to proceed before a magistrate judge. Fu rther, Hardin did not identify this as an issue in his postjudgment motions or in his document listi ng numerous issues fo r appellate review. As to the merits, without a trial transcri pt we cannot review his challenges to the district court’s evidentiary rulings. See Schmid v. United B hd. of Carpenters & Joiners , 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). In No. 07-3140, Hamilton’s separately file d notice of appeal was untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1),(3) (time limits for filing notice of appeal in civil case); Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co. , 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (jurisdictional issues will be raised sua sponte if there is indication juri sdiction is lacking; timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional); see also Porchia v. Norris , 251 F.3d 1196, 1198 (8th Cir. 2001) (inmate bears burden of proving his entitlement to benefit of prison mailbox rule); Burgs v. Johnson County, Iowa , 79 F.3d 701, 702 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (untimely notice of appeal cannot se rve as motion for extension of time to file appeal). Accordingly, in Hardin’s appeal we affirm, see8th Cir. R. 47B, and we also deny his pending motion. We dismiss Hamilton’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

______________________________
|Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph P. Caruso, and I, Paul S. Weiner
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our
knowledge:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                      | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: May 8, 2007                    | 
|                                      | 
|                                      | 
|By:/s/ Joseph P. Caruso               | 
|Joseph P. Caruso                      | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                      | 

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|Dated: May 8, 2007      | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|By:/s/ Paul S. Weiner   | 
|Paul S. Weiner          | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|                        | 

|
|
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00202-CV

Austin Gurdwara Sahib, Inc. d/b/a Gurdwara Sahib Austin, Appellant

v.

John A. Bollier and Leslie J. Bollier, Appellee

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-08-000511, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed a joint motion requesting that this appeal be dismissed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Henson and Goodwin

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: June 7, 2012
EXHIBIT
      32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











We, each hereby certify to the best of
our knowledge that the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of Gateway Tax Credit Fund
III, Ltd. for the period ended June 30, 2008 containing the financial statements
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained
in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Gateway.








/s/ Ronald M.
      Diner
              Ronald
      M. Diner
              President
              Raymond
      James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
              (Managing
      General Partner)
              August
      13, 2008/s/ Jonathan
      Oorlog
              Jonathan
      Oorlog
              Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer
              Raymond
      James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
              (Managing
      General Partner)
              August
      13, 2008
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Ron Howell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K of HST Global, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2013;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: April 4, 2014By:\s\ Ron HowellRon HowellInterim Chief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4602 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1332 Sharon Copley Road in Sharon Center, Ohio, as the ‘‘Emil Bolas 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Mr. BOCCIERI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1332 Sharon Copley Road in Sharon Center, 

Ohio, as the ‘‘Emil Bolas Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EMIL BOLAS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1332 Sharon Copley Road in 

6 Sharon Center, Ohio, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Emil Bolas Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4602 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Emil Bolas Post Of3 fice’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations
found in item 14(a) of the Company's form 10-k for the year-to-date, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,758
<SECURITIES>                                    13,204
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                       635
<INVENTORY>                                         96
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,107
<PP&E>                                          17,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,083
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,152
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,426)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,083
<SALES>                                         16,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,134
<CGS>                                            3,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   754
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,574)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        


</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-17-00655-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

TEXAS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS 

PROPERTY/CASUALTY JOINT SELF 

INSURANCE FUND, Appellant,

v.

PHARR SAN JUAN ALAMO ISD, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

 

O R D E R

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the appellate record and briefs. The Reporter’s

Record Volume 3, Plaintiff’s Exhibit 16 pages 154-157 contains “Copy Colored 

Photograph of E-ZGo Cart.” The three photo copies are black and white and poor 

quality.
2

The county clerk is hereby ORDERED to forward the original Plaintiff’s Exhibit 16 

“Copy Colored Photograph of E-ZGo Cart” to this Court within fifteen days from the date 

of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

30th day of May, 2019.
#### Harold Sherman UPTON *v.*John M. GRAVES, Circuit Judge

CR 73-149

509 S.W. 2d 823

November 13, 1973

*Richard H. Mays,*for petitioner.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Petition for admission to bail.

PER CURIAM

This is a petition for bail pending retrial of petitioner Harold Sherman Upton following the reversal of his first degree murder conviction, *Upton*v. *State,*254 Ark. 664, 497 S.W. 2d 696. The trial court in refusing bail as in capital offense cases recognized the effect of *Furman*v. *Georgia,*408 U.S. 238, 92 S. Ct. 2726, 33 L. Ed. 2d 346 (1972), on our death penalty statutes, but took the position that Act 438 of 1973 reinstated the death penalty as to felony murder cases committed prior to the effective date thereof. We disagree.

Since the authorities define an ex post facto law as one that renders an act punishable in a manner in which it was not punishable when committed, *White*v. *Brown,*468 F. 2d 301 (9th Cir. 1972), it follows that, in view of *Graham*v. *State,*253 Ark. 462, 486 S.W. 2d 678 and *Kuehn*v. *State,*253 Ark. 889, 489 S.W. 2d 505, the capital felony provisions of Act 438 cannot be applied retrospectively to offenses committed prior to its adoption, Ark. Const. Art. 2 § 17.

This matter is referred back to the trial court for the fixing of bail.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                      10,027,386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,273,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,531,101
<PP&E>                                         123,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,950,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,444,426
<BONDS>                                     13,167,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,397
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,663,201)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,950,218
<SALES>                                     12,797,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,030,411
<CGS>                                        1,251,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,993,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,192,772)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,406,545)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (384,595)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,021,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,021,950)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>