alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

MEGAN FREE, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:18-cv-15 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

(by full consent of the parties) 

DECISION AND ENTRY 

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of 

Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. 

(Doc. #16). Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees 

in the amount of $4,250.00, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims 

Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. The award of attorney fees will 

satisfy all of Plaintiff's claims for fees, costs, and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in 

this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and not her attorney, can be offset to 

satisfy pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the United States under Astrue v. Ratliff, 

130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). 

After the Court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that 

Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the 

award be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly 
2

signed by Plaintiff and counsel. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney’s Fees 

under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #16) is accepted 

and Defendant shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees, costs, and 

expenses in the total amount of $4,250.00; 

2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this 

Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such 

pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award 

directly to Plaintiff=s counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment 

signed by Plaintiff and counsel; and 

3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: December 19, 2019 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington

 United States Magistrate Judge
DENY; and Opinion Filed June 4, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00629-CV

IN RE JAY SANDON COOPER, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-01611-2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek

Opinion by Justice Brown

Relator Jay Sandon Cooper is a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order. See TEX. CIV.

PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.101(a). In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of 

mandamus directing the trial court to (1) enter an order declaring the June 25, 2015 prefiling order 

void, and (2) enter an order requiring the district clerk to file certain motions relator submitted for 

electronic filing in April 2019 that the district clerk purportedly refused to accept. 

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly 

abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 

148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we 

conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the 
–2–

court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

190629F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Gary Siegel, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:           November 11, 2010





/s/ GARY SIEGEL*


Name:         Gary Siegel


Title:           Vice President, Finance














* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by Genta Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Extended Stay America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: February 28, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ GEORGE D. JOHNSON, JR.
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                        
|                         |  |  |  |                           
|                        
|                         |  |  |  |                           





1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00636-CR

Kenneth Wayne Rickaby, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 13,019, HONORABLE CHARLOTTE HINDS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Counsel for appellant has filed a motion to permanently abate the appeal because of

the death of appellant. Tex. R. App. P. 7.1(a)(2). The motion is granted. The opinion dated

February 24, 2009, is withdrawn, the motion for rehearing is dismissed, and the appeal is

permanently abated.

___________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Permanently Abated

Filed: June 18, 2009

Do Not Publish
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4576 

To require a study and report on the feasibility and potential of establishing 

a deep water sea port in the Arctic to protect and advance strategic 

United States interests within the evolving and ever more important 

region. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2010 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require a study and report on the feasibility and potential 

of establishing a deep water sea port in the Arctic to 

protect and advance strategic United States interests 

within the evolving and ever more important region. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arctic Deep Water 

5 Sea Port Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON ESTABLISHMENT OF ARCTIC DEEP 

7 WATER PORT. 

8 (a) STUDY.— 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4576 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in 

2 consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Secu3 rity, shall conduct a study on the feasibility and po4 tential of establishing a deep water sea port in the 

5 Arctic to protect and advance strategic United 

6 States interests within the evolving and ever more 

7 important Arctic region. 

8 (2) SCOPE.—The study required under para9 graph (1) shall address the following issues: 

10 (A) The capability that such a port would 

11 provide. 

12 (B) Potential and optimum locations for 

13 such a port. 

14 (C) Resources needed to establish such a 

15 port. 

16 (D) The time frame needed to establish 

17 such a port. 

18 (E) The infrastructure required to support 

19 such a port, including Command, Control, Com20 munications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveil21 lance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) facilities, 

22 health care facilities, barracks and housing, air23 field and pier support, and operations facilities. 

24 (F) Any other issues the Secretary deter25 mines necessary to complete the study. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 4576 IH

1 (b) REPORT.—Not later than two years after the date 

2 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

3 shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and 

4 Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Represent5 atives a report on the findings of the study conducted 

6 under subsection (a). 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          37,393
<SECURITIES>                                    45,779
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (12,215)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,461
<PP&E>                                         289,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                (175,256)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 744,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,674
<BONDS>                                        172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           488
<OTHER-SE>                                     410,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   744,098
<SALES>                                        115,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,713
<CGS>                                           31,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,711)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,295
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .175
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .166


</TABLE>
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 
   
Simmons Bank,

Trusteefor Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
August 6, 2018  By 
/S/ LEE ANN ANDERSON
   Lee Ann Anderson   Senior Vice President**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Alan Brevaldo,

Plaintiff,

v. Case NO. 2:18-cv-446

Muskingum County Sheriff’s

Office, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This is a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983 brought by

plaintiff, Alan Brevaldo, an Ohio inmate, against the Muskingum

County Sheriff’s Office and Captain Dave Suciu for alleged

violations of his Eighth Amendment rights. Plaintiff alleged that

while incarcerated at the Muskingum County Jail prior to his

conviction in state court, he was assaulted on at least five

occasions, and, with one exception, was denied medical treatment

after these alleged assaults. Plaintiff’s claims include the use

of excessive force and inadequate medical treatment. Defendants

moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a

claim. See Doc. 13.

On November 6, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a report and

recommendation which recommended granting the motion to dismiss. 

The magistrate judge agreed with defendants’ argument that the

Muskingum County Sheriff’s Office is not a legal entity capable of

being sued, but construed the complaint as being against Muskingum

County. The magistrate judge then concluded that the complaint did

not allege facts sufficient to show that the alleged constitutional

violations were the result of a custom or policy of the county, and

recommended dismissal of the claims against the county without
prejudice. The magistrate judge further concluded that the

complaint failed to allege a claim against defendant Suciu, as

there were no allegations indicating that he had knowledge of or

was personally involved in the alleged violations. The magistrate

judge recommended that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Suciu

be dismissed without prejudice. The magistrate judge further

recommended that plaintiff be afforded thirty days in which to file

an amended complaint.

The report specifically advised the parties that objections to

the report and recommendation were due within fourteen days, and

that the failure to object to the report and recommendation “will

result in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review

the Report and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a

waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court

adopting the Report and Recommendation.” Doc. 17, p. 10. The time

period for filing objections to the report and recommendation has

expired, and no objections to the report and recommendation have

been filed.

The court agrees with the report and recommendation (Doc. 17),

and it is hereby adopted. The defendants’ motion to dismiss for

failure to state a claim (Doc. 13) is granted, and plaintiff’s

action as originally filed (see Doc. 8) is dismissed without

prejudice for failure to state a claim for which relief may be

granted. Plaintiff has already filed an amended complaint, see

Doc. 18, and leave to file that amended complaint is granted. 

Date: November 28, 2018 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge 

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 2172)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of NIH Pathway to Independence Awards (K99/R00).                    

*Date:*                         March 14, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         John J. Laffan, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN18J, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2773,                         *laffanjo@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 7, 2022. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-00523 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Verso Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87528, 333-85386, 333-66292, 333-45028, 333-53965, and
333-37013) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-74258, 333-74264, 333-59372, 333-92337,
333-85107, 333-80501, and 333-26015) of Verso Technologies, Inc. of our report
dated February 14, 2003, except as to paragraph 1 of Note 6 and paragraph 5 of
Note 18, which are as of April 7, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Verso Technologies, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002,
and all related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the
December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Verso Technologies, Inc.

Our report refers to the adoption, effective July 1, 2001, of the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business
Combinations," and certain provisions of SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," as required for goodwill and other intangible assets
resulting from business combinations consummated after June 30, 2001, and the
full adoption of all provisions effective January 1, 2002.



/s/ KPMG

Atlanta, Georgia
April 11, 2003
Exhibit 99.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter Ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") by Rachel's Gourmet Snacks, Inc.
("Registrant"), I, Pablo Malacara, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

    1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

    2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.


                                        Rachel's Gourmet Snacks, Inc.

          DATE: August 28, 2002         By: /s/ Pablo Malacara
                                            ------------------
                                            Pablo Malacara
                                            Its Chief Financial Officer


                                       19
EXHIBIT 21


                  HOST MARRIOTT SERVICES CORPORATION
                        LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES



               DOMESTIC                                  FOREIGN
-------------------------------------   -------------------------------------

Host International, Inc.                Host International of Canada, Ltd.

Host Marriott Tollroads, Inc.           Marriott Airport Concessions Pty Ltd.

Gladieux Corporation                    Host of Holland B.V.

Host International Inc. of Maryland     Horeca Exploitatie Maatschappij 
                                           Schiphol, B.V.

Michigan Host, Inc.                     Marriott Airport Terminal Services, Inc.

The Gift Collection, Inc.               Host Services Pty Ltd.

Host Gifts, Inc.

Host Services of New York, Inc.

Sunshine Parkway Restaurants, Inc.

Host International, Inc. of Kansas

Las Vegas Terminal Restaurants, Inc.

Turnpike Restaurants, Inc.

Host Marriott Services U.S.A., Inc.

HMS Holdings, Inc.

Host Services, Inc.

Cincinnati Terminal Services, Inc.

Cleveland Airport Services, Inc.

Marriott Family Restaurants, Inc.



                                   E-2
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 58
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 2 of 9 PAGEID #: 59
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 3 of 9 PAGEID #: 60
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 4 of 9 PAGEID #: 61
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 5 of 9 PAGEID #: 62
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 6 of 9 PAGEID #: 63
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 7 of 9 PAGEID #: 64
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 8 of 9 PAGEID #: 65
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 9 of 9 PAGEID #: 66