alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Atlanta, Georgia 30303

3104 

Re: Georgia's Recommendations for S02 Attainment Areas Near Georgia Power's Plant Scherer 

in Monroe County 

Dear Ms. McTeer Toney: 

On June 2, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the primary national 

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide (S02) by establishing a new 1-hour 

standard at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). EPA is required to conduct an expedited round 

of S02 attainment status designations by July 2, 2016 as a result of the consent decree 

between the EPA and Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council. Based on this 

schedule, states are required to provide recommendations and supporting information to EPA 

for this round of designations by September 18, 2015. The expedited round of designations are 

categorized into two groups: (1) areas that have newly monitored violations and (2) areas that 

contain any stationary source, not announced for retirement, that emitted more than 16,000 tons 

of S02, or emitted more than 2,600 tons of S02 and had a emission rate greater than 0.45 

lbs/MMbtu in 2012. 

Plant Scherer is a stationary source located in Monroe County whose 2012 emissions were 

greater than 16,000 tons of S02 in 2012. Therefore, the area surrounding Plant Scherer has 

been identified for early designation. Plant Scherer is located in Juliette, GA, just north of Macon 

and approximately 70 miles south of Atlanta. Georgia Power has submitted a dispersion 

modeling report and related modeling files prepared by AECOM, Inc. to support this early 

designation. Georgia EPD has reviewed the modeling report and files to ensure that the 

dispersion modeling has been conducted in accordance with the final Data Requirements Rule 

(ORR) and Modeling Technical Assistance Document (TAD) using the most recently available 

information. 

Based on the modeling analysis, S02 emissions from Plant Scherer do not cause or contribute 

to any violations of the 1-hour S02 NAAQS. Besides Plant Scherer, there are no other sources 

of S02 in Monroe County. In addition, there are no large sources of S02 in or nearby any of the 

neighboring counties (Bibb, Jones, Jasper, Butts, Lamar, Upson, and Crawford). Therefore, 

Georgia EPD is recommending the following counties be designed unclassifiable/attainment for 

the 2010 1-hour S02 NAAQS: 

• Monroe County, 

• Bibb County, 

• Jones County, 

• Jasper County, 

• Butts County, 

• Lamar County, 

• Upson County, and 

• Crawford County 
JHT:JB 

c: Lynorae Benjamin, EPA Region 4 

Karen Hays, Branch Chief, EPD Air Protection Branch 

Attachments
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-07621) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1995 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and LCA-Vision Inc. Directors’ Nondiscretionary Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 333-74485) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1998 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123522) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 2001 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-135414) pertaining to the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of LCA-Vision, of our reports dated March 8, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of LCA-Vision Inc., and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of LCA-Vision Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Cincinnati, Ohio 

March 8, 2011
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 2 of 19 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 3 of 19 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 4 of 19 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 5 of 19 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 6 of 19 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 7 of 19 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 8 of 19 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 9 of 19 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 10 of 19 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 11 of 19 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 12 of 19 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 13 of 19 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 14 of 19 PAGEID #: 14
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 15 of 19 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 16 of 19 PAGEID #: 16
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 17 of 19 PAGEID #: 17
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 18 of 19 PAGEID #: 18
Case: 3:18-mj-00261-SLO Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/18 Page: 19 of 19 PAGEID #: 19
IN THE MONTANA SUPREME COURT

 No. DA 21-0137

__________________________________________________________________

STATE OF MONTANA, 

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 vs.

SHELBY BRYAN RAGNER, 

 Defendant and Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________

 ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

 On motion of appellant, good cause appearing, and with no objection

from the State, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Appellant is granted an extension of 

time until April 1, 2022, in which to prepare, file, and serve his 

opening brief in this matter. 

 DATED: ________________________

 

 __________________________

 Chief Justice

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 16 2022

02/16/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0137
<PAGE>   1


     Exhibit 12



                       CENCOM CABLE INCOME PARTNERS, L.P.
                 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
                      (In thousands except ratio amounts)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        1996           1995      1994      1993        1992
                                    ----------  -------------  --------  --------  ----------
<S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings
--------
Income(loss) before taxes               $1,057         $3,453    $3,811    $3,368    $(3,134)
Fixed Charges                            1,291          5,581     4,096     3,641       4,454
                                    ----------  -------------  --------  --------  ----------
Earnings                                 2,348          9,034     7,907     7,009       1,320
Fixed Charges
-------------
Interest Expense                         1,291          5,403      3842     3,368       4,249
Amortization of debt costs                   -            178       254       273         205
                                    ----------  -------------  --------  --------  ----------
Total Fixed Charges                     $1,291         $5,581    $4,096    $3,641      $4,454
                                    ==========  =============  ========  ========  ==========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges         1.8            1.6       1.9       1.9           -
</TABLE>

(1)  Earnings for the year ended December 31, 1992 were insufficient to cover
     the fixed charges by $3,134.  As a result of such deficiency, the ratio is
     not presented above.
























                                     - E-3-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The   schedule  contains  summary  financial  information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  and  consolidated  statements  of  income  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,101,749
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      863,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        313,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                          10,657,088
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,935,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,018,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,935,422
<SALES>                                            276,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,488,736
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,156,788
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    66,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  79,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    331,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                331,948
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       331,948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         2.38  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.38   
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 

TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, :

 :

 Plaintiff, : 

 : Case No. 3:18cv00130 

 vs. : 

 : District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

DENISE FOSTER, : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

 : 

Defendant. : DECISION AND ENTRY

 

 The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #5), to whom this case was originally 

referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed 

thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has 

expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on April 25, 2018 (Doc. #5) 

is ADOPTED in full; 

 2. This case is REMANDED to the Montgomery County, Ohio Court of 

Common Please pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(c) and 1915(e)(2); and 

 3. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. 

 

 _______________________ 

 Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:07-mj-242

 

-vs- Chief Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

:

LAKEISHA BURNEY,

Defendant.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:07-mj-243

 

-vs- Chief Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

:

VERNELL BURNEY,

Defendant.

RECUSAL AND TRANSFER ORDER

All judges at the Dayton location of court are unable to proceed in these matters and hereby

recuse themselves. The matters are hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Black, the current duty

magistrate judge at the Cincinnati location of court, for preliminary examination and detention

hearing. Should the Defendants or either of them be indicted, it is respectfully requested that Chief

Judge Beckwith provide for the assignment of the resulting criminal case to a district judge resident

at the Cincinnati location of court.

October 16, 2007.

s/ Michael R. Merz

 Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 1:07-cr-00137-MHW Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/16/07 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 23
2

copies: The Honorable Sandra S. Beckwith

The Honorable Thomas M. Rose

The Honorable Walter Herbert Rice

The Honorable Sharon L. Ovington

The Honorable Timothy Black

Vipal Patel

Cheryll Bennett

Aaron Durden

Case: 1:07-cr-00137-MHW Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/16/07 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 24
#### James BARTON Jr. *v.*STATE OF ARKANSAS

CR 74-1

508 S.W. 2d 554

Opinion delivered May 6, 1974

*Harold L. Hall,*Public Defender for appellant.

*487
      *Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *Richard Mattison,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellant was charged with first-degree rape and first-degree kidnaping. Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 41-3401 and 41-2308 (Supp. 1973). The jury returned a verdict of guilty upon each charge and imposed a 99-year sentence for the crime of rape and a 20-year sentence for the crime of kidnaping. Two points for reversal are urged by the public defender.

First, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the rape conviction is questioned. The point is without merit. The prosecutrix, working alone in an office as a tax consultant, became suspicious of the appellant’s conduct and succeeded in expressing her fears by telephone to her supervisor, who notified the city police. When the prosecutrix hung up the telephone, the defendant produced a pistol, forced her to .accompany him to a nearby vacant building, and committed what the prosecutrix described as three acts of rape. The police arrived while the two were still in the building and testified at the trial that the defendant had a pistol and that the prosecutrix was nude. There was other corroborating proof that we need not detail.

Counsel for the appellant, citing *Mills*v. *United States,*164 U.S. 644 (1897), insists that the prosecutrix's failure to make any outcry should be taken to indicate consent on her part. The short answer to that contention is that the woman was acting at gunpoint, from which the jury evidently found that her submission was not voluntary. Counsel also discusses certain minor time discrepancies in the testimony, but at most they raised an issue of credibility for the jury.

The second point for reversal relates to the admissibility of the appellant’s statement to the officers. We find no error. The officers’ explanation of the accused’s rights was not deficient, as it was in *Moore*v. *State,*251 Ark. 436, 472 S.W. 2d 940 (1971), where the explanation stated that a lawyer would be appointed for the accused if and when he went to court. Here the officers used a form which stated that “1 have the right to talk with an attorney, either retained by me or appointed by the court, before giving a statement, and to have my attorney present when answering any questions.” Thus *488the defect that existed in *Moore*was not present in the case at bar.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee
 for the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust:

We are aware that Cross Timbers Oil Company and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust have
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-56983 on Form S-3,
and that Cross Timbers Oil Company has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statement No. 33-55784 on Form S-8, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, which includes our report dated
May 5, 2000, covering the unaudited interim financial information contained
therein.  Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is
not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our
firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas
May 11, 2000
'; 

·. SERVED: MARCH 15, 2013 

UNITED STATES OF AMERh ... A 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

Aviation Technical Services, Inc. 

FAA Docket No. cPrro BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS No. FAA-2011·0682 

ORl>fi~R GRANTING J;:XTENSION OF TIME 

FOR ~'fLING OF POST -HEARING BRIEFS 

Pursuant to 14 C.P.R. § 13.213(a), Complainant Federal Aviation Administration has 

agreed to the request of Respondent Aviation Tech11ico.I Services, Inc. (ATS), for a one-week 

extension for the filing of ATS's Post-Hearing Brief. Accordingly, the Post-Hearing Briefing 

Schedule ln this matter is amended as follows: 

1. The Post-Hearing BriefofRcspondent Aviation Technical Services, Inc., shall be 

1iled on or before March 22, 2013. 

2. The Rebuttal Brief of the Federal Aviation Administration, if any, shall be tiled on or 

before April 8, 2013. 

e_-~r~~ Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. i\.dministralive Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
... 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0682 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC~430 

Wilbur Wright Building --Suite 2Wl000* 

ONE COPY 

Dane B. Jaques, Esq., Respondent's Counsel 

McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP 

1676 International Drive, Penthouse 

McLean, VA 22102 

(FAX) (703) 336-8750 

Karen D. Huber, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

FAA Northwest Mountain Region 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renton, W A 98057 

(FAX) (425) 227·1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Ol1ice of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202,;366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

li<Scrviuc was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier. usc lhc followiog addn:ss: Pcdc!'al Aviation 

Administration, 600 Indc(')endencc Ave. SW. Wilbur Wright Building -suite 2W I 000, Wm;hington, DC 20591; Attention: 

Hcariltg Docket Clerk, AGC-4.30.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

ALEN MILANKO,

Petitioner,

vs.

ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cv-328

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. 

Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 9)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

State Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate 

Judge reviewed the pleadings and, on August 30, 2018, submitted a Report and 

Recommendation. (Doc. 9). No objections were filed. 

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 

of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its

entirety. 

Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED; 

2. Respondents’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 8) is GRANTED; 

3. Petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel (Doc. 2) is DENIED 

as MOOT; and
4. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

terminated on the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 11/21/18 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
Order entered July 3, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00411-CV

PNC BANK, N.A., Appellant

V.

RPCG-GP I, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-01763

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s July 2, 2019 unopposed motion for a seven-day extension 

of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than July 

15, 2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3375-3376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01315]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on 
Wednesday, January 26, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov.

STATUS: The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public via webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to 
Form PF to require current reporting and amend reporting requirements.
    2. The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to 
the definition of an exchange under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
and re-propose amendments to Regulation ATS for ATSs That Trade U.S. 
Government Securities, NMS Stock, and Other Securities and to 
Regulation SCI for ATSs That Trade U.S. Government Securities.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain

[[Page 3376]]

what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

     Dated: January 19, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01315 Filed 1-19-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           252,356
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    646,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      883,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,975,833
<PP&E>                                         1,810,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (952,935)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,388,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            825,352
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          42,442
<OTHER-SE>                                    15,571,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,388,116
<SALES>                                        1,482,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,482,799
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,374,009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,894,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,894,479)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,894,479)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.38)



</TABLE>