alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 23 (ii)


To the Board of Directors
General Electric Capital Services, Inc.:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
33-7348) on Form S-3 of General Electric Capital  Services,  Inc., of our report
dated  February 12,  1999,  relating to the  statement of financial  position of
General  Electric  Capital  Services,  Inc. and  consolidated  affiliates  as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related  statements of earnings,  changes in
share  owners'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended December 31, 1998, and related  schedules,  which report appears in
the December  31, 1998 annual  report on Form 10-K of General  Electric  Capital
Services, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 25, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         151,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      17,520,300
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,173,200)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,807,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     12,701,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,372,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,807,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               764,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  396,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               229,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             301,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (163,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (163,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.83)
        

</TABLE>
#### George v Department of Corrections,

No. 90833;

Court of Appeals No. 131675.
#### Jerry ATKINS v. STATE of Arkansas

696 S.W.2d 306

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered September 9, 1985

*Mark W. Corley,*for appellant.

*Steve Clark,*Att’y Gen., by: *Clint Miller,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Jerry Atkins, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Mark W. Corley, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, *In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.*

*486A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         536,526
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      885
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               537,411
<PP&E>                                      61,100,449
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,676,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,961,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          537,411
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,423,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,961,107
<SALES>                                      2,335,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,339,189
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,294,969
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,294,969
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,294,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .382
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .382
        

</TABLE>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

TOTAL QUALITY LOGISTICS, LLC, 

PLAINTIFF, 

v. 

LEE M. HUBBARD, 

DEFENDANT. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

CASE NO. 1:18-cv-366 

Judge Susan J. Dlott 

AGREED ORDER REMANDING CASE 

By agreement of the parties, this case is hereby remanded to the Clermont County Court 

of Common Pleas, and Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees concerning Defendant’s removal of 

the case to federal court is withdrawn. Each party shall be responsible for its own costs and 

attorney’s fees. 

SO ORDERED. 

 ____S/Susan J. Dlott___________ 

 Judge Susan J. Dlott 

/s/ Timothy G. Pepper 

____________________________ 

Timothy G. Pepper (0071076) 

Valerie M. Talkers (0088769) 

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP 

40 North Main Street, Suite 1700 

Dayton, OH 45423 

(937) 641-2054 

(937) 228-2816-fax 

pepper@taftlaw.com

vtalkers@taftlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 
2 

/s/ Stephen E. Imm 

____________________________ 

Stephen E. Imm (0040068) 

Finney Law Firm, LLC 

4270 Ivy Pointe Blvd., Suite 225 

Cincinnati, OH 45245 

(513) 943-5678 

(513) 943-6669-fax 

stephen@finneylawfirm.com

Attorney for Defendant
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0354 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-SW-104-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
|Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION BY CFO
PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
connection with the quarterly report of Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph
P. Caruso, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul S. Weiner, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |       
| | ------
| | By:   
| | Name: 
| | Title:
| | Date: 

| |       
| | ------
| | By:   
| | Name: 
| | Title:
| | Date: 

|This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|
```
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-32.2
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>hybridexhbit321-063004.txt
<DESCRIPTION>CERTIFICATION OF CFO PER SECTION 906
<TEXT>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

      The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc.(the "Company")
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/  Mark Clancy
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                 Mark Clancy
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 November 1, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Advisory committee on Bankruptcy Rules; notice of cancellation of open hearing.

# SUMMARY:

                        The following virtual public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing on January 28, 2022. The announcement for this hearing was previously published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 11, 2021.                    

# DATES:

January 28, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bridget Healy, Esq., Acting Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

Dated: January 11, 2022.

Shelly L. Cox,

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2022-00655 Filed 1-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1106** 

SYLVIA CARAVETTA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00540

- JCC

- JFA )

Submitted : June 12, 2012 Decided: June 15, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and T H ACKER , Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion
. Sylvia Carave tta, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Lee Santoni, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sylvia Caravet ta seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint with prejudice . In civil actions in which the United States or its officer or agency is not a party, a notice of appeal must be filed with the district court within thirty days a fter entry of the district court’s final judgment or order. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court may ext end the filing time if “a party so moves no later than 30 days after the time prescribed by . . . Rule 4(a) expires” and the party shows excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(i)

- (ii). The district court’s order dismissing Carave tta’s complaint was entered on December 21, 2011. Caravetta had thirty days, or until Friday, January 20, 2012, to file a notice of appeal. Caravetta filed her notice of appeal on Monday, January 23, 201 2 , thirty

- three days after judgment was entered. Although Caravetta’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, it was filed within the thirty

- day excusable neglect period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(i). Further, the notice of appeal reflects a request for an extension of the thirty

- day appeal p eriod. Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of enabling the court3 to determine whether Caravetta has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the appeal period. The record, as supplemented , will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED
Dear Assistant Secretary Kelly:

As outlined in 10 CFR 430.27, Sub-Zero respectfully submits the attached revised request for both an interim and

final waiver to modify the DOE test procedure (Test Procedures for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and

Freezers (Final Rule and Interim Final Rule), 75 Fed. Reg. 78,810 (Dec. 16, 2010)) for Sub-Zero refrigerators usingtwo compressors. Without this waiver, we are unable to certify new dual compressor models as compliant with

Energy Star andlor DOE minimum efficiency standards. Therefore we request an expedited review of this request.

In accordance with the instructions for submitting an interim waiver request, Sub Zero is also sending this waiver

petition to all known manufacturers of domestically marketed units of the same product type, namely:AGA MarvelBlomberg -Arcelik A.S.BSH Home Appliances Corporation

Electrolux Home Products NAFagor America, Inc.

Fisher & Paykel Appliances

GE Appliances & Lighting

Haier America -White Goods Group

Indesit Company Sa

LG Electronics USALiebherr-Canada Ltd.

Miele, Inc.

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.Sanyo North America Corporation

Scotsman Ice SystemsU-Line Corporation

Viking Range CorporationWhirlpool Corporation

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Paul V. Sikir

Vice President of Sub-Zero Design Engineering

Cc: Kathleen Hogan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency in the Office of Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy (EERE)

4717 Hammersley Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53711 TEL 800.532.7820 TEL 608.271.2233 x 608.270.3362

SUB-ZERO, INC. WOLF APPLIANCE, INC.
Case: 2:18-cv-00445-JLG-EPD Doc #: 112 Filed: 01/08/22 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 1618
Case: 2:18-cv-00445-JLG-EPD Doc #: 112 Filed: 01/08/22 Page: 2 of 6 PAGEID #: 1619
Case: 2:18-cv-00445-JLG-EPD Doc #: 112 Filed: 01/08/22 Page: 3 of 6 PAGEID #: 1620
Case: 2:18-cv-00445-JLG-EPD Doc #: 112 Filed: 01/08/22 Page: 4 of 6 PAGEID #: 1621
Case: 2:18-cv-00445-JLG-EPD Doc #: 112 Filed: 01/08/22 Page: 5 of 6 PAGEID #: 1622
Case: 2:18-cv-00445-JLG-EPD Doc #: 112 Filed: 01/08/22 Page: 6 of 6 PAGEID #: 1623
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4468 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4468

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
for the relief of victims of the January 12, 2010, earthquake in Haiti.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2010

   Mr. Murphy of New York (for himself and Mr. Himes) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
for the relief of victims of the January 12, 2010, earthquake in Haiti.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Haiti Action Initiative and Tax 
Incentive Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR CHARITABLE CASH 
              CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF OF HAITIAN EARTHQUAKE VICTIMS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any contribution described 
in subsection (b) made during January 2010 as if such contribution was 
made on December 31, 2009, and not in January 2010.
    (b) Contribution Described.--A contribution is described in this 
subsection if such contribution is a cash contribution made for the 
relief of victims in areas affected by the January 12, 2010, earthquake 
in Haiti for which a charitable contribution deduction is allowable 
under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```