alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ernest PATRICK et al *v.*Betty Lou RANKIN, Executrix

73-249

506 S.W. 2d 853

Opinion delivered March 25, 1974

*Jones & Segers,*for appellants.

Kincaid, *Horne & Trumbo,*for appellee.

Frank Holt. Justice.

Calvin Curtis Patrick died at the age of 84, unmarried and without issue. About one year prior to his death, an attorney prepared a will divising all of Patrick’s property to appellee, Betty Lou Rankin, who was related to Patrick by marriage and had provided care for him since her childhood. Patrick had been totally blind from childhood and was illiterate. The will was signed in the attorney’s office by Patrick with the assistance of Mrs. Rankin. Two witnesses then signed the will pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 60-403 (Repl. 1971). The court held the will valid.

Appellants, decedent’s brothers and sisters challenging the will, contend for reversal “that the lower court erred in ruling that an individual who was blind, illiterate and had never been able to read or write could execute a will with only two witnesses.” Appellants ask us to declare that an illiterate blind man cannot be assisted in making a signature, which assertedly constitutes only his “mark,” and must, therefore, have three witnesses to his will. We cannot agree.

. It is true that where the testator signs by a mark, it is mandatory that three signatures be affixed, one to witness the *311testator’s mark and two to attest the will. See § 60-403, *supra, Green*v. *Smith,*236 Ark. 829, 368 S.W. 2d 280 (1963), and *Priola*v. *Priola,*237 Ark. 798, 377 S.W. 2d 29 (1967). We have long held, however, that when the testator is assisted in signing a will, the act is his own and not the act of another under authority from him. *Vines*v. *Clingfost,*21 Ark. 309 (1860). See generally 2 Page on Wills § 19.53 (3d. Ed. 1960). In the case involving a hundred year old blind testatrix who had not been able to write for eighteen years, we approved her signature although she was assisted. *Coleman*v. *Walls,*241 Ark. 842, 410 S.W. 2d 749 (1967). Although we have the additional factor of illiteracy in the case at bar, we hold that the controlling factor in an assisted signature is not the testator’s literacy but his intent. As one court explained:

> Whether a testator can write at all makes no difference in determining the validity of a will, nor does it matter whether he is so stricken that he cannot write, or can write only with difficulty. Where testator’s mental conception is entirely clear and he desires to sign the will, but his physical powers unassisted will not permit it, and such assistance is called in, the incident of assistance becomes immaterial so long as there is a conscious wish of the testator that his hand should make the signature. *Brehony*v. Brehony, 289 Pa. 267, 137 A. 260 (1927).

In accord is *Fritz*v. Turner, 46 N.J. Eq. 515, 22 A. 125 (1890).

The testator’s intent is not challenged in this appeal. His signature on the will is clearly legible. Also, it appears that he was assisted in subscribing his signature in other business affairs. Since two witnesses properly signed the will, the statutory requirements of § 60-403, *supra,*are met.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF P.A.M. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUAALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           7,629
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                       324
<INVENTORY>                                        468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,271
<PP&E>                                          78,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,306
<BONDS>                                         37,966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               50
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,808
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,595
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    89
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,073
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,014
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00280

- CR

Justin Dallas ARRIOLA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court

, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- 04

- 12554

- CR

Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to dismiss is

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED October 21, 2020.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 1 of 27 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 2 of 27 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 3 of 27 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 4 of 27 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 5 of 27 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 6 of 27 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 7 of 27 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 8 of 27 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 9 of 27 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 10 of 27 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 11 of 27 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 12 of 27 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 13 of 27 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 14 of 27 PAGEID #: 14
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 15 of 27 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 16 of 27 PAGEID #: 16
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 17 of 27 PAGEID #: 17
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 18 of 27 PAGEID #: 18
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 19 of 27 PAGEID #: 19
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 20 of 27 PAGEID #: 20
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 21 of 27 PAGEID #: 21
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 22 of 27 PAGEID #: 22
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 23 of 27 PAGEID #: 23
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 24 of 27 PAGEID #: 24
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 25 of 27 PAGEID #: 25
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 26 of 27 PAGEID #: 26
Case: 2:18-cv-00482-EAS-CMV Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/15/18 Page: 27 of 27 PAGEID #: 27
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Syndication, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Mrutyunjaya S. Chittavajhula., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

      Dated: August 31, 2006


                                        /s/ Mrutyunjaya S. Chittavajhula.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mrutyunjaya S. Chittavajhula.
                                        Chief Financial Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000881788
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners, L.P., Series E

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          9,348,486
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  69,658,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,692,981
<INVENTORY>                                        27,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                         20,707,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,263,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 95,001,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                        70,675,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,269,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   95,001,422
<SALES>                                         6,795,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,252,127
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,427,710
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,249,998
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,115,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      458,752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.75
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Michael E. Havener, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|        | (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |
|                                 | (2)      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                                 |

|       | /s/ Michael E. Havener         |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                           | Michael E. Havener             |
|                           | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                           | Premiere Global Services, Inc. |
|                           | October 8, 2008                |

----
Essential Air Service At Pueblo CO

OST-1999-6S89
January 27, 2014 

### ,P' ?

## 8 L\ 

### c: " 1 >.--"Ii.... ,.' 4 I It hascome to the attention ofTransportAzumah that several EASmarkets will beexperiencing an interruption in service beginning at the end of this week. The inventory for Pueblo COiszeroed out in the Great Lakesreservations system after Friday, January 31, 2014. Service interruptions in EAS communities tend to destroy the passenger baseof the markets involved. This leads to numerous bid periods in which the community exceeds $200 per passenger in subsidy and puts them under constant risk of being eliminated from the program.
In order to maintain the passenger base atthese communities, TransportAzumah proposes the implementation of emergency interim busservice. These emergency contracts would be issued under the Department's discretionary authority for an interim period of three months while Skywest prepares to start service. TransportAzumah hasthe ability to implement these services beginning February 1, 2014 using midsized and full sized long distance coaches. During the interim period, there would be no fare charged on these services.

The following markets would receive emergency interim busservice beginning February 1: TransportAzumah Emergency Interim BusService Market Hub Raund Trips PerDay 3Manth Subsidy Pueblo CO DEN 3 $286,224
TransportAzumah recognizes that this program may require the communities to opt into the alternate EASprogram for ashort period of time. Aswith past agreements, communities should be aware that opting into the alternate EASprogram isnot permanent. Inthis situation, the Department could allow communities to opt into the alternate EASprogram only during the period of air service hiatus. We believe that three months issufficient for motivated air carriers to submit abid to restore air service to these communities. Sample busschedules are provided below. They are subject to change: 

### Pueblo CO- DEN Pueblo CO

### > DEN(Daily) Pueblo CO SlSa 111Sa 515p DEN 730a BOp 730p DEN> Pueblo CO(Daily) DEN 800a 200p 800p Pueblo CO 1015a 415p 1015p

In light of the short timeframe available to avoid uninterrupted service, we request expedited consideration of our request. Dueto the length of this contract, we will also need modified payment arrangements. Please contact usassoon aspossible sothat we can start on orjust after February 1, 2014.

Contact: JoelAnabilah-Azumah, jazumah@transportazumah.com, 347-927-0750
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-85,808-01 & WR-85,808-02

EX PARTE CODY ALLEN BUTTERFIELD, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. CR01864 & CR02066 IN THE DISTRICT COURT

FROM RED RIVER COUNTY

Per curiam. ALCALA, J., concurs.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual

assault of a child and engaging in organized criminal activity and sentenced to sixteen and eight

years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his convictions.

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to

investigate his mental health history, failing to pursue a defense of lack of intent, failing to utilize

his alcohol addiction as a mitigating factor, and improperly informing him of his parole eligibility

date. 
2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte

Moussazadeh, 361 S.W.3d 684, 690 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In these circumstances, additional

facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960),

the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel

to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any

means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 
3

Filed: October 19, 2016

Do not publish
exv10w19







EXHIBIT 10.19




Base
Salaries for Fiscal Year 2009, Cash Bonuses and Equity Compensation Awards for Fiscal Year 2008




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2009	 	2008	 	Stock Option(1)	 	Restricted Stock
	Name and Title	 	Salary	 	Bonus	 	Grant (shares)	 	Award(2) (shares)
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	N. Anthony Coles, M.D.

President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	650,000	 	 	$	625,000	 	 	 	105,000	 	 	 	15,000	(3)
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Laura A. Brege

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	 	$	452,600	 	 	$	187,425	 	 	 	49,000	 	 	 	7,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Gregory W. Schafer(4)

Former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	300,000	 	 	$	102,900	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 









 




			
	(1)	 	One-eighth of the shares subject to the stock options will vest on the six month
anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining shares will vest in equal monthly
installments over the following 42 months.
	 
	(2)	 	One-third of the shares subject to the restricted stock award will vest on the one year
anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining shares will vest in two equal
installments on the second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.
	 
	(3)	 	Dr. Coles also received a restricted stock award of 20,000 shares pursuant to the
amendment of his employment agreement. The terms of the award are described in the Current
Report on Form 8-K with which this exhibit is filed.
	 
	(4)	 	As previously disclosed, Mr. Schafer resigned as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer effective January 5, 2009. His annualized salary for 2009 is the same as for 2008.
EX-4.4



 Exhibit 4.4 

CONSENT OF BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDON LLP 

October 5, 2015 
 We hereby consent to the references to our
firm under the heading “Legal Matters” and our firm and opinion under the heading “Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations” in each case in the Offer and Circular that forms a part of the Registration Statement on Form
F-80 dated October 5, 2015 filed by Suncor Energy Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”). In giving this consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required by
the Act or the rules thereunder. 
  

	
	Yours truly,
	
	 /s/ Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

	BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDON LLP
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Kennedy, Susan Butler" <SKENNEDY@southernco.com> Date: 7/20/2010 1:48 PM Subject: Re: Gulf Power Company - Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines - ICR Attachments: pic08007.jpg; Gulf Steam ICR extension request.pdf

Greetings, EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the following Gulf Power Company facilities:

Crist Plant Lansing Smith Plant Scholz Plant Extension request has been granted for the above facilities. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 or Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire. If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic08007.jpg)

From: "Kennedy, Susan Butler" <SKENNEDY@southernco.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Vick, James O." <JOVICK@southernco.com>, "Markey, Richard M." <RMMARKEY@southernco.com>, "Hill, Donna B." <DBHILL@southernco.com>, "Beaty, Kevin L." <KLBEATY@southernco.com>

Date: 06/25/2010 01:30 PM Subject: Gulf Power Company - Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines - ICR

The attached is being sent on behalf of Jim Vick... Please acknowledge rece ipt of this message.(See attached file: Gulf Steam ICR extension request.pdf)
<PAGE>

Consent of Independent Auditors

We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference in the Registration Statement
(Form  S-8 No. -33-65864)  pertaining  to  the  1992   Employee  Incentive   and
Non-Qualified  Stock  Option  Plan  and  1993 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Program  of  Cryenco  Sciences,  Inc.,  and  the  Registration  Statement  (Form
S-8  No. -333-1379)  pertaining  to  the  1995 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock
Option  Plan  of  Cryenco  Sciences,  Inc., of our report dated October 5, 1996,
with  respect  to  the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cryenco
Sciences,  Inc.  included  in  the  Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
August 31, 1996.



                                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Denver, Colorado
November 25, 1996



<PAGE>