alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,370,482
<SECURITIES>                                 1,569,520
<RECEIVABLES>                                      750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,545,183
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,323,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,234,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,323,626
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,560
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,056
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (643,212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (643,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (643,212)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (17.30)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (17.30)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NET LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01093]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: MRSEC--Columbia 2nd Year Virtual Site Visit 
(1203).

DATE AND TIME: April 28, 2022; 9:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

PLACE: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 [verbar] 
Virtual.

TYPE OF MEETING: Part-Open.

CONTACT PERSON: Dr. Cosima Boswell-Koller, Program Director, Division 
of Materials Research, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Room W 9216, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-8800.

PURPOSE OF MEETING: Virtual site visit to provide an evaluation of the 
progress of the projects at the host site for the Division of Materials 
Research at the National Science Foundation.

AGENDA: 

                             April 28, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m.........  Brief Charge to       CLOSED.
                               Panel.
10:00 a.m.-10:10 a.m........  Introduction........  OPEN.
10:10 a.m.-10:55 a.m........  Director's Overview.  OPEN.
10:55 a.m.-11:10 a.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
11:10 a.m.-11:30 a.m........  IRG-1 Presentation..  OPEN.
11:30 a.m.-11:35 a.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
11:35 a.m.-11:45 a.m........  Break...............  OPEN.
11:45 a.m.-12:05 p.m........  IRG-2 Presentation..  OPEN.
12:05 p.m.-12:10 p.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
12:10 p.m.-12:35 p.m........  Education and         OPEN.
                               Outreach, Diversity
                               Plan.
12:35 p.m.-12:45 p.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
12:45 p.m.-01:30 p.m........  Working Lunch.......  CLOSED.
01:30 p.m.-02:30 p.m........  Poster Session......  OPEN.
02:30 p.m.-02:45 p.m........  Site Visit            OPEN.
                               Discussion.
02:45 p.m.-03:30 p.m........  Executive Session...  CLOSED.
03:30 p.m.-04:00 p.m........  Debriefing..........  OPEN.
04:00 p.m...................  Adjourn.............
------------------------------------------------------------------------

REASON FOR CLOSING: The work being reviewed during closed portions of 
the virtual site visit include information of a proprietary or 
confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, 
such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the project. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 14, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-01093 Filed 1-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JAMES A. FONTAINE                                              
|James A. Fontaine                                                  
|Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 4, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WPI GROUP, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 27, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                          50,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,690,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                   898,000
<INVENTORY>                                 16,764,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,076,355
<PP&E>                                      22,457,637
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,262,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             106,073,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       82,226,370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,499
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,267,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               106,073,966
<SALES>                                     68,153,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,153,904
<CGS>                                       40,030,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               67,989,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,196,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,757,357)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,757,357)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,757,357)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)


</TABLE>
Novembe r10 , 201 0 

## •^ARTMEN T O F \N3P0RW!0 N '..•'\l L 

## : TOPERATION S Simplify . Fl y Gl .

/i'-i^i.-^^.iSi!^' , CENTRA L NEBRASK A REGIONA L AIRPOR T

Denni s DeVan yan d Mr . Schlemme r U.S . Departmen t of Transportatio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysis , X-5 3 120 0 New Jerse yAvenu e S E Wasliington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea rMr . DeVan yan d Mr . Schlemmer : Today , tii e Hai l Count yAirport Authorit yBoar d fro m th e Centra l Nebrask a Regiona l Airport (GRI ) me t t o decid e o n a preferre d hu b fo rth e upcomin g Essentia l Ai rServic e bid . Th e Hal l CountyAirport Authorit yvote d t o adop t th e followin g resolutio n a s ou rpreferre d hub s an d typ e o f aircraft : RESOLUTIO N 10-60 : Resolve d tha t th e Hal l CountyAirport Authorit ymake s th e followin g recommendation(s ) t o th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT) : Non-sto p regiona l je t Ai rServic e fo rth e Centra l Nebrask a Regiona l Airport unde rth e Essentia l Ai r Servic e (EAS ) progra m to : 1 . Chicago , I L (ORD ) or ; 2 . Dallas-For

t Worth , T X (DFW ) Th e Airpor

t Authorit ywoul d lik e t o than k th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n fo rth e opportunit yt o submi t ou rreques t t o preferre d hub s an d typ e o f aircraft . Sincerel ysubmitted , HAL L COUNT

Y AIRPOR T AUTHORIT Y !^/...— - Michae l J . Otson , AA E Executiv e Directo r MJO:dk p 374 3 Sk yPar k Roa d Gran d Island , N E 6880 1 Phon e 308.385.517 0 Fax308.385.517 9 FlyGrandlsland.co m
4823-4517-5945, v.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

STACIE RAY, et al. 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

LANCE HIMES, et al. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 CASE NO.: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV 

JUDGE MICHAEL WATSON 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHELSEY 

VASCURA 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL 

Please take notice that the undersigned is hereby withdrawing as counsel of record for the 

defendants in the referenced matter. The firm of Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, and Albert J. 

Lucas and Jason J. Blake will continue in their representation of defendants. 

Dated: February 27, 2019 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Kimberly Moses 

KIMBERLY MOSES (0029601) 

ALBERT J. LUCAS (0007676) 

JASON J. BLAKE (0087692) 

CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP 

1200 Huntington Center 

41 S. High Street 

Columbus, Ohio 43215 

Telephone: (614) 621-1500 

Fax: (614) 621-0100 

kmoses@calfee.com 

alucas@calfee.com 

jblake@calfee.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 
2 

4823-4517-5945, v.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on February 27, 2019, a copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing 

system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. Parties may access this filing 

through the Court’s system. 

/s/ Kimberly Moses 

One of the Attorneys for Defendants
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40595 Conference Calendar

__________________
GREGORY WILCOX, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CASIANO, Officer Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-92-CV-376

- - - - - - - - - - (October 19, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gregory Wilcox has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Wilcox must show that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). Wilcox's bare assertion that his appeal involves an Eighth Amendment argument is insufficient to identify a nonfrivolous appellate issue. Brinkmann v. Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); see F ED . R. A PP . P. 28(a)(6).No. 95-40595 -2-

His claim of ineffective counsel at his civil trial is frivolous. The Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply in civil litigation. Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv. , 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). Wilcox's motion to appeal IFP is DENIED and the appeal, which is frivolous, is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Wilcox that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Wilcox is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court.
CONFIDENTIAL PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT

Requested by: Date: 6/25/13

Location: Phone:

Project Description

Analysis of by G as C hromato graphy equipped with Flame Ionization Detector (GC

- FID )

The pr oducts formed in the typical reaction have all been identified and characterized by multiple analytical

techniques. Quantification was achieved by analysis of peak percent area

. To the best of our knowledge, the structures

list ed in Figure 3 are accurate representations of all products present in the reaction at levels >1%.

To identify the peaks in the GC, all products of the crude reaction (before purification) were separated and purified by

silica gel chromatography. Proton and Carbon NMR analysis was used as a primary method to identify the products of

the reaction. When ever possible, the NMR data was compared to published NMR data on the same or similar products.

2D NMR was also used for product identification. Mass spectrometry (GCMS and ESI

- MS) and IR analyses were also

conducted.

Figure 1. Products of

1. Compound 1 was compared to known data, verified by NMR and ESI

- MS.

2. Compound 2 was compared to a commercially available sample

3. Compound 3 was inferred based on NMR and ESI -MS

4. Compound 4 was inferred based on NMR, ESI

- MS, and independent synthesis using an alternative

method.CONFIDENTIAL Analytical Approach

Sample was analyzed using a n Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with flame ionization detector

. Slightly polar

m ethyl silicone capillary column was used to separate detected peak s.

• Inlet Temp: 208 °C

• Head Pressure: 7.3 psi

• Split Ratio 20:1

• Column Flow: 1.5 ml/min

• Velocity: 26 cm/sec^2

• Constant Flow Mode

• Oven Tem Program:

• Init Temp: 60 °C

• Init Time: 0 min

• Ramp: 10 °C per min

• Final Temp: 320 °C

• Hold Time: 14min

• Final Time: 40 min

• Detector temp: 400 °C

• Injection Volume: 0.2ul

Summary of Results

Table 1 shows the retention times and peak areas of the compounds in the reaction mixture

. In addition to the

structures depicted in the table, t her e are and

Fig u re 2 shows the chromatogram of the sample. The presence of cannot be detected

by GC, presumably du e to its instability in the GC.

Peak Name

- Structures Retention Time (min) % Area

T able 1: ( )CONFIDENTIAL Figure 2: Chromatogram.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin A. Schmidt, Principal Financial Officer, certify, that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Neffs Bancorp, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
     being prepared;

          (b) intentionally omitted;

          (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions
     about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
     the end of the period covered by this annual report based upon such
     evaluation; and

          (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.


Date: March 28, 2005                    By: /s/ Kevin A. Schmidt
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Principal Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CHAD WEST, 

 

 Petitioner, 

 CASE NO. 2:18-CV-122 

 v. JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH 

 Magistrate Judge Vascura 

WARDEN, CORRECTIONS 

RECEPTION CENTER, et al. 

 Respondents. 

OPINION AND ORDER 

On March 2, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) 

recommending that this habeas action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state 

court remedies. (ECF No. 2). Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the 

R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The R&R 

(ECF No. 2) is therefore, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A), the Court must also assess whether to issue a 

certificate of appealability. See also Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings 

for the United States District Courts (explaining that a “district court must issue or deny a 

certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to [an] applicant”). Petitioner has 

waived, however, the right to file an appeal by failing to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's 

recommendations. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 
2 

F. 2d 947, 950 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court therefore DECLINES to issue a certificate of 

appealability. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

    

 s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 03/31/98 and Consolidated Statement of 
Operations for the year ended 03/31/98 and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,009
<SECURITIES>                                    11,611
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                       502
<INVENTORY>                                         66
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,371
<PP&E>                                          16,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,957
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,735
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,379)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,499
<SALES>                                         12,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,724
<CGS>                                            2,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,946)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,946)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.69)
        


</TABLE>