alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ABG CAR AND TRUCK RENTALS, LLC, 

et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No.

DISTRICT JUDGE

PLAINTIFF AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC’S

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In Compliance with Local Civil Rule 7.1.1, this Corporate Disclosure Statement is filed 

on behalf of Plaintiff Avis Rent A Car System, LLC.

1. Is said party a parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of a publicly owned 

corporation?

 X YES NO

If the answer is YES, list below the identity of the parent, subsidiary or other affiliate corporation

and the relationship between it and the named party:

Avis Rent a Car System, LLC, is a subsidiary of Avis Budget Group, Inc. Avis Budget 

Group, Inc. is a publicly traded corporation. No corporation owns more than 10% of its stock.

2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the case that has a financial 

interest in the outcome?

_____YES X NO

If the answer is YES, list the identity of such corporation and the nature of the financial interest.

N/A

Case: 2:17-cv-00776-MHW-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/31/17 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 44
2

Respectfully submitted,

By: s/ Daniel J. Gentry

Daniel J. Gentry (0065283)

COOLIDGE WALL CO., L.P.A.

33 W. First Street, Suite 600

Dayton, OH 45402

Phone: 937-223-8177

Fax: 937-223-6705

E-mail: gentry@coollaw.com

Trial Attorney for Plaintiff

Avis Rent A Car System, LLC

OF COUNSEL:

Christian Poland (to be admitted pro hac vice)

Bryan Cave LLP

161 N. Clark St., Suite 4300

Chicago, IL 60601

Phone: 312-602-5000

Fax: 312-698-7485

E-mail: christian.poland@bryancave.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on the 31st day of August 2017, a copy of the 

foregoing was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of 

the Court’s E-filing system and copies will be mailed via U.S. Mail to those parties to whom 

electronic notice has not been sent. Parties may access the filing through the Court’s system.

s/ Daniel J. Gentry

Daniel J. Gentry

w:\wdox\client\000178\00100\00898414.docx

Case: 2:17-cv-00776-MHW-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 08/31/17 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 45
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PRESIDENT,


SECRETARY
AND GENERAL COUNSEL


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
period ending January 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I Christopher J. Ryan , Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)                 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)                 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Christopher J.
Ryan


Christopher
J. Ryan


Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary


and
General Counsel





April 15,
2009






85
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 2, 2019

No. 04-19-00521-CV

IN RE DDAV WATER, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On July 31, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a 

motion for stay of the trial court’s July 31, 2019 “Order Granting Defendant, DTB Investments, 

L.P.’s Emergency Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order and Motion to Dismiss,”

which this court granted on July 31, 2019. After considering the petition and the record, this 

court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on July 31, 2019 is 

LIFTED. The motions filed by the real party in interest to lift this court’s stay are DENIED AS 

MOOT. This court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on August 2, 2019.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 20019-CI-15029, styled DDAV Water, LLC v. DTB Investments, L.P., 

pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. presiding.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 694 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 694

Recognizing 100 years of service by chief petty officers in the United 
                          States Coast Guard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2020

   Mr. Wicker (for himself and Ms. Cantwell) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 
                           and Transportation

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2020

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing 100 years of service by chief petty officers in the United 
                          States Coast Guard.

Whereas, on May 18, 1920--

    (1) Congress passed the Act of May 18, 1920 (41 Stat. 601; chapter 
190), which blended the enlisted personnel of the Life-Saving Service and 
the Revenue Cutter Service, the 2 precursors to the modern United States 
Coast Guard; and

    (2) the United States Coast Guard issued General Order 43, which 
amended article 817 of the United States Coast Guard Headquarters 
Regulations to establish the non-commissioned United States Coast Guard 
rank of chief petty officer;

Whereas May 18, 2020, marked 100 years since the date of the establishment of 
        the rank of chief petty officer in the United States Coast Guard;
Whereas individuals who are selected to serve in the esteemed position of chief 
        petty officer in the United States Coast Guard must possess the highest 
        standards of professionalism, technical expertise, and personal 
        integrity;
Whereas chief petty officers in the United States Coast Guard provide advice and 
        assistance in matters affecting the enlisted members of the United 
        States Coast Guard and their families; and
Whereas, for 100 years, chief petty officers in the United States Coast Guard 
        have--

    (1) been examples of leadership, honor, and selfless service;

    (2) freely accepted responsibility beyond the call of printed 
assignments; and

    (3) through their actions, and the performance of their duties, gained 
the respect and admiration of their seniors and juniors: Now, therefore, be 
it

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes 100 years of service by chief petty officers 
        in the United States Coast Guard; and
            (2) honors past and present chief petty officers in the 
        United States Coast Guard, who have served in support of the 
        safety, security, and stewardship of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 3:18-cr-00015-WHR Doc #: 16 Filed: 02/13/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 35
Case: 3:18-cr-00015-WHR Doc #: 16 Filed: 02/13/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 36
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4628 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4628

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, as the ``Sergeant 
              Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER R. HRBEK POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4628

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, as the ``Sergeant 
              Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building''.
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted April 18, 2006

Decided May 19, 2006

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

DONALD BRADFISCH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

NO. 05-3390 V.

TEMPLETON FUNDS, INC. and TEMPLETON GLOBAL

ADVISORS, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Southern

District of Illinois.

No. 05 C 298

Michael J. Reagan, Judge.

VINCE KWIATKOWSKI, EDMUND WOODBURY AND

JOSEPH PARISE, JR.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

Nos. 05-3558, 05-3559 & v.

05-3586

TEMPLETON GROWTH FUND, INC., et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States

District Court for the Southern

District of Illinois.

Nos. 05 C 299

05 C 301

05 C 300

G. Patrick Murphy, Chief Judge.

Order

These four appeals are governed by the Supreme Court's decision in Merrill Lynch,

Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit, 126 S. Ct. 1503 (2006). Although the plaintiffs maintain

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
Nos. 05-3390, 05-3558, 05-3559 and 05-3586 Page 2

that Dabit does not control because (in their view) the defendant funds have been negligently 

managed, they have not sought relief through derivative litigation and therefore cannot take

advantage of the exception for that kind of suit in the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards

Act of 1998. For direct litigation, labels are not material, as we explained in Kircher v. Putnam

Funds Trust, 403 F.3d 478 (7th Cir. 2005), cert. granted on other grounds, 126 S. Ct. 969 (2006),

a decision that the Supreme Court approved in Dabit.

These appeals are not affected by the grant of certiorari in Kircher. The Supreme Court

limited the writ to a dispute about appellate jurisdiction of appeals by defendants from remand 

orders under the SLUSA. These defendants did not appeal from the district court's orders in 2004

remanding the suits. They removed again following the decision on the merits in Kircher, and 

the only appeals have been filed by the plaintiffs.

On the authority of Dabit and Kircher, the judgments are affirmed.
#### Elaine WARREN, A Minor, and William C. WARREN *v.*Betty HAYES

73-138

500 S.W. 2d 923

Opinion delivered November 13, 1973

*Cockrill, Laser, McGehee, Sharp ir Boswell,*for appellants.

*Howell, Price, Howell ir Barron,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Late in the afternoon of the day before trial of this rear end automobile collision case appellants Elaine Warren, a minor, and William C. Warren amended their general denial answer to plead contributory negligence. Over objections of appellee Betty Hayes and notwithstanding a motion for a continuance, the case was tried to a jury resulting in a $1,000 personal injury verdict. The trial court granted appellee a new trial. We cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion under the circumstances.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                                 
<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
                                                              
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              9,781
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    32,783
<PP&E>                                              156,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      337,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               32,478
<BONDS>                                             122,301
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            169,674
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        337,424
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    81,647
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       44,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     6,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                        1,988
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 4,197
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        4,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        


</TABLE>
#### People v McDonald,

No. 90908;

Court of Appeals No. 134293.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3507-3508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB735]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Research Steering Committee (RSC) of the Mid-Atlantic 
Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold a workshop to consider 
the potential redevelopment of the Council's research set-aside (RSA) 
program. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for agenda details.

DATES: The workshop will be held via webinar on Wednesday, February 16, 
2022, from 9 a.m. through 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The workshop will take place over webinar with a telephone-
only connection option. Details on how to connect to the webinar by 
computer

[[Page 3508]]

and by telephone will be available at: www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
website: www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RSC is hosting a workshop to develop 
recommendations for the possible redevelopment of the Council's RSA 
program. This is the final workshop in a series four that scoped out 
research, funding, and enforcement/administration issues and problems 
associated with the previous RSA program and identified possible 
considerations and improvements should a new program be redeveloped. 
During this workshop, participants will review and provide feedback on 
the recommendations identified from the first three workshops, draft 
program goals and objectives, and an initial draft strawman of a newly 
designed RSA program developed by the RSC. Based on the feedback and 
input received during the workshop, the RSC will then make final 
recommendations regarding the potential redevelopment of the RSA 
program to the Council for consideration later in 2022.
    A detailed agenda and background documents will be made available 
on the Council's website (www.mafmc.org) prior to the meeting.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 18, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-01195 Filed 1-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
**Exhibit      32 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |            |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:   | /s/ Daniel                S. Laikin By:                Daniel S. Laikin Chief                Executive Officer November                28, 2007 |

|   |            |                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:   | /s/ Lorraine                Evanoff By:                Lorraine EvanoffPrincipal                Accounting Officer November                28, 2007 |

----
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee 

for the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust: 

 

We areaware that XTO Energy Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust have incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-56983 on Form S-3, and that XTO Energy Inc. has incorporated by reference in its Registration Statement Nos. 33-55784 and333-91460 on Form S-8, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, which includes our report dated July 25, 2003, covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation Cof the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

August 6, 2003 ****
Order entered December 12, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00145-CV

WILLIAM W. MCGUIRE, Appellant

V.

FIRST UNITED BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-03797-2012

ORDER

On October 25, 2022, we granted appellee’s motion to extend time to file its 

brief after appellee informed us that the parties had begun working on a settlement 

agreement. Our order granting the extension directed the brief or a status report be 

filed no later than November 23, 2022 if a motion to dismiss had not yet been filed. 

To date, no motion to dismiss has been filed and neither has the brief or status 

report. Accordingly, we ORDER a motion to dismiss, appellee’s brief, or a status 

report be filed no later than December 28, 2022.
We caution that failure to comply may result in the appeal being submitted 

on appellant’s brief alone.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2081** 

In re: DENNIS RAY GRAVES , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 1:16

- cv - 01131

- JCC

- JFA )

Submitted : March 30 , 2017 Decided: April 3, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Dennis Ray Graves, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Ray Graves petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the state court to vacate his convictions and
sentence . We conclude that Graves is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraord inary circumstances. Kerr v. U .S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003)
. Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal
. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007)
. This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg
C ty. , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969) , and d oes not have jurisdiction to review final state court orders, Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). The relief sought by Graves in not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Graves leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense wi th oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. PETITION DENIED