alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           7
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            1,079,740
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                   0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                     0
<EQUITIES>                                         20,281
<MORTGAGE>                                              0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                           0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  1,249,455
<CASH>                                             11,804
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                      0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             55,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,975,713
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                   780,044
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                               404,042
<POLICY-OTHER>                                          0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                   0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                         0
<COMMON>                                              340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        453,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,975,713
<PREMIUMS>                                        366,844
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                56,122
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  4,222
<OTHER-INCOME>                                          0
<BENEFITS>                                        234,568
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        83,586
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               51,343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    45,849
<INCOME-TAX>                                       13,567
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                32,282
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       32,282
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         104
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         101
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                    373,606
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                               294,324
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                       0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 50,665
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                  147,013
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                   483,539
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                           (13,287)
        


<PAGE>
IIPP

https://secure.cds2.com:8080/main.html?download&weblink=4d0cd383a95e69e45664f2f15becb9f0&r ealfilename=IIPP - v3.0.pdf
Case: 1:18-cr-00019-TSB Doc #: 11 Filed: 05/09/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 22
#### Francis T. PROCTOR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 18187.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 3, 1965.

For prior opinion see 338 F.2d 533.

Mr. A. Alvis Layne (appointed by this court), Washington, D. C„, for appellant.

Mr. David Epstein, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., Frank Q. Nebéker and Harold H. Titus, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before Bazelon, Chief Judge, and Fahy, Washington, Danaher, Bastían, Burger, Wright, and McGowan, Circuit Judges, in Chambers.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file his lodged supplemental petition for rehearing *en banc,*it is

ORDERED by the Court *en banc*that appellant’s aforesaid motion be granted, and the Clerk is directed to file appellant’s lodged supplemental petition for rehearing *en banc,*and

On consideration whereof:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the Court *en banc,*there not being a majority of the Judges of this circuit in favor of granting appellant’s supplemental petition for rehearing *en banc,*that appellant’s said supplemental petition is denied.

. BAZELON, Chief Judge, and FAHY, WASHINGTON and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, would grant rehearing *en banc.*

BAZELON, Chief Judge

(dissenting).

This is a petition for leave to file out of time a supplemental petition for rehearing *en banc.*The matter is complicated by the fact that petitioner has applied for certiorari in the Supreme Court.

The instant petition alleges that the issue whether appellant’s confession was voluntary was improperly submitted to the jury. This claim, it is further alleged was not argued on appeal because it was not supported by then-existing law, and was not argued in the earlier petition for rehearing *en banc*because counsel was not then aware of the Supreme Court decisions in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1964); and Muschette v. United States, 378 U.S. 569, 84 S.Ct. 1927, 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964). Petitioner’s claim appears to have substantial merit.1 Moreover, I consider that the pendency of the application for certiorari does not divest us of jurisdiction. I therefore vote to grant leave to file this petition and to grant rehearing *en banc.*

1

. See Remmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 904, 75 S.Ct. 288, 99 L.Ed. 710 (1955); United States v. Killian, 246 F.2d 77, 82 (7th Cir. 1957).
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.17.3.


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
MONSANTO COMPANY
ERISA PARITY SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN


(As Amended and Restated as of December 31, 2008
And Subsequently Amended Through June 11, 2012)


WHEREAS, Monsanto Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), maintains the Monsanto Company ERISA Parity Savings and Investment Plan (As Amended and Restated as of December 31, 2008 and Subsequently Amended Through June 11, 2012) (the “Plan”) for the benefit of its eligible employees;


WHEREAS, the Company, acting through the Internal People Committee or its delegate, reserved the right to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 10 thereof; and


WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to re-insert the last paragraph of Section 4.1(a)(i), which was inadvertently omitted from Statement of Amendment No. 2.


NOW THEREFORE, effective immediately, the Plan is further amended as follows:


1.    Section 4.1(a)(i) of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following as the final paragraph of such Section:


The above-referenced rules shall not apply to any election made by an Eligible Employee to make Catch-Up Contributions to the SIP Plan in accordance with Section 4.6 of the SIP Plan.  Any such election to make Catch-Up Contribution to the SIP Plan shall have no impact upon the amounts creditable to an Eligible Employee under this Plan.


2.    Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Amendment No. 3 to the Plan, all other provisions of the Monsanto Company ERISA Parity Savings and Investment Plan (As Amended and Restated as of December 31, 2008 and Subsequently Amended Through June 11, 2012) shall remain in full force and effect.
**Exhibit
      32**





**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
      such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 **** of
      the
      Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K **** fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





Dated:
            February
              27, 2008
            
            /s/
                Steven C. Straus
            
            Name:
                Steven C. StrausTitle:
                Chief Executive OfficerDated:
            February
              27, 2008
            
            /s/
                Alan H. Buckey
            
            Name:
                Alan H. BuckeyTitle:
                Executive Vice President/Finance andChief
                Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Strategic 
Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC, 
pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--DP22-001, Real-World 
Effectiveness of Structured Lifestyle Interventions in Preventing Type 
2 Diabetes.
    Date: March 23, 2022.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.-6:00 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaya Raman Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health 
Promotion, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop S107-8, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341-3717, Telephone: (770) 488-6511; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d677f4c404c436d4e494e034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="773d25161a16193714131459101801">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-00868 Filed 1-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4618 

For the relief of Emilio Maya and Analia Maya. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2010 

Mr. HINCHEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Emilio Maya and Analia Maya. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR EMILIO 

4 MAYA AND ANALIA MAYA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Emilio Maya and Analia Maya shall each be eligible 

8 for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 

9 status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 

10 residence upon filing an application for issuance of an im11 migrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjust12 ment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4618 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Emilio Maya or 

2 Analia Maya enters the United States before the filing 

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be con4 sidered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 

5 if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 

6 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

7 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Emilio Maya and Analia Maya, the Secretary 

16 of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 2, 

17 during the current or next following fiscal year, the total 

18 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na19 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

20 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli21 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

22 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

23 under section 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4618 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Emilio Maya and Analia 

2 Maya shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 

3 any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 

4 Nationality Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Bill NEEDHAM *v.*Marilyn NEEDHAM

5-5363

459 S. W. 2d 417

Opinion delivered November 9, 1970

*Sexton, Wiggins ir Christian,*for appellant.

*Garner ér Parker,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The trial court in this divorce case awarded the custody of Marshall Wayne Needham, age 3, to the mother of appellee, Marilyn Needham. In so doing it gave appellee reasonable visitation rights at any and all times but limited the appellant, Bill Need-ham to every other week-end and on Wednesday from 4:00 to 10:00 P. M. Appellant here contends that the custody should have been awarded to him.

The record shows that the parties were married in 1965 and lived together until July 22, 1969. To this marriage was born Marshall Wayne Needham.

The unfitness of the appellee to have custody is not seriously in dispute. The record is replete with indiscretions involving other men and in particular one boy, age fifteen, to such an extent that the boy’s mother complained to appellee. Further appellee at one time was *412on dope until her mother had her committed to an institution.

The record shows that appellant, the father of the child, is steadily employed and that if awarded custody he would keep the child at his mother’s and father’s home. The only testimony touching upon appellant’s character was that on one or two occasions he slapped or hit the appellee and that early one morning he attempted to kick a front door down when he found ap-pellee and another man in their jointly purchased house under circumstances from which one could surmise that the man had spent the night.

Appellant’s mother testified that her home consisted of two bedrooms upstairs, two bedrooms downstairs and a living room and kitchen. Living at her home were her husband, her son Charles and his three children and appellant. When Marshall Wayne spent the night with her, he slept with appellant. Her son Charles was divorced from his wife and she was helping him with his children.

It was pointed out in *Rayburn*v. *Rayburn,*231 Ark. 745, 332 S. W. 2d 230 (1960), that a natural parent’s right to custody of a child is paramount to all others unless the parent is proved to be incompetent or unfit. Here, we can find, nothing in the record to show that the father is either incompetent or unfit. On the contrary the record demonstrates the appellant to be a steadily employed man who has attempted on numerous occasions and under some rather trying circumstances to maintain a home for himself and the child.

The appellee, to sustain the award of custody to her mother, argues that the appellant’s proposed arrangements for keeping the child at his mother’s home were inadequate because of the number of people living there. Appellee’s assertion in this respect is not supported by the record.

For the reasons stated, the award of custody is re*413versed with directions to award custody to the appellant, . subject to the appellee’s reasonable visitation rights.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
           This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from
the  consolidated  balance  sheets and  consolidated  statements  of  operations
contained in the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September  30,  1998 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1998 
<CASH>                                            288,815 
<SECURITIES>                                    3,477,353 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     895,662 
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0 
<INVENTORY>                                       958,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5,864,535
<PP&E>                                          4,644,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,235,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,896,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,121,443
<BONDS>                                         3,064,423
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                           654
<COMMON>                                            8,265
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,710,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,896,052 
<SALES>                                         4,101,458 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,193,938 
<CGS>                                           2,338,282 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   8,330,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (264,369)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,732,209)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.59)
        


</TABLE>
# Jornal Oficial C 28A/26 d

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 28A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 59.° ano26 de janeiro de 2016 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 28A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

59.° ano26 de janeiro de 2016

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avisos |
| | PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Serviço Europeu de Seleção do Pessoal (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 028A/01 | Lista de reserva — Concurso geral EPSO/AD/290/14 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua portuguesa (PT) | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

V   Avisos

PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Serviço Europeu de Seleção do Pessoal (EPSO)

2016/C 028A/01

Lista de reserva — Concurso geral EPSO/AD/290/14 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua portuguesa (PT)

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

V Avisos

PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Serviço Europeu de Seleção do Pessoal (EPSO)

| 26.1.2016 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 28/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2016

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 28/1

---

LISTA DE RESERVA (1)

CONCURSO GERAL EPSO/AD/290/14

JURISTAS-LINGUISTAS (AD 7) DE LÍNGUA PORTUGUESA (PT)

(2016/C 028 A/01)

| ANDRADE E SILVA | Filipa |
| --- | --- |
| COSTA | Graça |
| DE JESUS COTTIM | Armando |
| MORAES LEITÃO FREITAS DA COSTA GAGLIARDI | Cristina |
| RECHENA | Bruno |
| TÁVORA | Atónio |
| VERÍSSIMO | Nuno |

ANDRADE E SILVA

Filipa

COSTA

Graça

DE JESUS COTTIM

Armando

MORAES LEITÃO FREITAS DA COSTA GAGLIARDI

Cristina

RECHENA

Bruno

TÁVORA

Atónio

VERÍSSIMO

Nuno

A validade da lista de reserva expira em 31 de dezembro de 2018.

---

(1)  A pedido expresso de um candidato aprovado, o seu nome não será publicado.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         839,395                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,537                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               841,932                       0
<PP&E>                                      61,100,449                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,117,147                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,825,234                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          841,932                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,983,302                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,825,234                       0
<SALES>                                      2,477,134               4,830,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,483,053               4,839,882
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,423                 114,456
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,424,630               4,725,426
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,424,630               4,725,426
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,424,630               4,725,426
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.404                   0.788
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.404                   0.788


</TABLE>