# Patent

## Title
Automated hazard handling routine activation

## Abstract

Disclosed herein are example embodiments for automated hazard handling routine activation. For certain example embodiments, at least one machine, such as an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV), may: (i) detect at least one motivation to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV; or (ii) activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on at least one motivation. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, or so forth.

## Background
If an Application Data Sheet (ADS) has been filed on the filing date of this application, it is incorporated by reference herein. Any applications claimed on the ADS for priority under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120, 121, or 365(c), and any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, etc. applications of such applications, are also incorporated by reference, including any priority claims made in those applications and any material incorporated by reference, to the extent such subject matter is not inconsistent herewith.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application is related to and/or claims the benefit of the earliest available effective filing date(s) from the following listed application(s) (the “Priority Applications”), if any, listed below (e.g., claims earliest available priority dates for other than provisional patent applications or claims benefits under 35 USC §119(e) for provisional patent applications, for any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, etc. applications of the Priority Application(s)). In addition, the present application is related to the “Related Applications,” if any, listed below.
PRIORITY APPLICATIONS
(1) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of United States patent application Ser. No. 13/720,694, entitled “Inter-Vehicle Communication for Hazard Handling for an Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV)”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 19 Dec. 2012, which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date.
(2) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/722,874, entitled “Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV) Inter-Vehicle Communication for Hazard Handling”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 20 Dec. 2012, which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date.
(3) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of United States patent application Ser. No. 13/728,642, entitled “Inter-Vehicle Flight Attribute Communication for an Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV)”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 27 Dec. 2012, which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date.
(4) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/730,202, entitled “Base Station Control for an Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV)”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 28 Dec. 2012, which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date.
(5) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/731,363, entitled “Automated Hazard Handling Routine Engagement”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 31 Dec. 2012 (on same date herewith), which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date.
(6) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of United States patent application Ser. No. 13/731,450, entitled “Collision Targeting for an Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV)”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 31 Dec. 2012 (on same date herewith), which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date.
(7) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of United States patent application Ser. No. 13/731,721, entitled “Collision Targeting for Hazard Handling”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 31 Dec. 2012 (on same date herewith), which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date.
RELATED APPLICATIONS
None
The United States Patent Office (USPTO) has published a notice to the effect that the USPTO's computer programs require that patent applicants reference both a serial number and indicate whether an application is a continuation, continuation-in-part, or divisional of a parent application. Stephen G. Kunin, Benefit of Prior-Filed Application, USPTO Official Gazette Mar. 18, 2003. The USPTO further has provided forms for the Application Data Sheet which allow automatic loading of bibliographic data but which require identification of each application as a continuation, continuation-in-part, or divisional of a parent application. The present Applicant Entity (hereinafter “Applicant”) has provided above a specific reference to the application(s) from which priority is being claimed as recited by statute. Applicant understands that the statute is unambiguous in its specific reference language and does not require either a serial number or any characterization, such as “continuation” or “continuation-in-part,” for claiming priority to U.S. patent applications. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Applicant understands that the USPTO's computer programs have certain data entry requirements, and hence Applicant has provided designation(s) of a relationship between the present application and its parent application(s) as set forth above and in any ADS filed in this application, but expressly points out that such designation(s) are not to be construed in any way as any type of commentary and/or admission as to whether or not the present application contains any new matter in addition to the matter of its parent application(s).
If the listings of applications provided above are inconsistent with the listings provided via an ADS, it is the intent of the Applicant to claim priority to each application that appears in the Priority Applications section of the ADS and to each application that appears in the Priority Applications section of this application.
All subject matter of the Priority Applications and the Related Applications and of any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, etc. applications of the Priority Applications and the Related Applications, including any priority claims, is incorporated herein by reference to the extent such subject matter is not inconsistent herewith.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of example realizations for at least one UFV in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIGS. 3A-3C are schematic diagrams of example UFV hazard handling scenarios or environments in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an example unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) including one or more example components in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an example base station, which may be in communication with at least one UFV, including one or more example components for a base station in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram of an example UFV that has one or more functional modules or one or more operational components in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram of an example base station that has one or more functional modules or one or more operational components in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram that includes at least one example machine, such as an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV), that is capable of handling scenarios for automated hazard handling routine activation in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIGS. 7B-7E are schematic diagrams that include at least one example machine and that depict example scenarios for implementing automated hazard handling routine activation in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIG. 8A is a flow diagram illustrating an example method for at least one machine with regard to automated hazard handling routine activation in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIGS. 8B-8E depict example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of FIG. 8A in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIGS. 9A-9B depict example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of FIG. 8A in accordance with certain example embodiments.
FIG. 10A depicts example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of FIG. 8A in accordance with certain example embodiments.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram 100 of at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 1, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 100 may include at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) 102 or at least one remote UFV 102R. For certain example implementations, any particular UFV: may be, comprise, or include a UFV 102, such as a local UFV, or may be, comprise, or include a remote UFV 102R. A given UFV scenario may be considered, analyzed, operated, viewed, or a combination thereof, etc. from a perspective of at least one local UFV 102 with regard to one or more remote UFVs 102R. Disclosure herein or in the accompany drawings, which form a part hereof, that is directed to a UFV 102 may additionally or alternatively be applicable to a remote UFV 102R, unless context dictates otherwise. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, a UFV 102 may comprise or include a vehicle that is not capable of being occupied by a human pilot (e.g., due to size, shape, power, atmospheric pressure, or a combination thereof, etc. constraints), a vehicle that is not designed to seat or otherwise safely support a person, a vehicle that is not controllable by an onboard human pilot, a vehicle that is being autonomously controlled at least partially by at least one onboard module, a vehicle that is being autonomously controlled at least partially by at least one off-board module, a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a UFV 102 may be at least comparable to or may comprise or include at least a portion of any one or more of: an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), a remotely piloted vehicle (RPV), an unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV), an unmanned aircraft (UA), a drone, an optionally-piloted vehicle (OPV) that is not currently being controlled by an on-board pilot, a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA), a remotely operated aircraft (ROA), a radio-controlled aircraft (R/C aircraft), an unmanned-aircraft vehicle system (UAVS), an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), a small unmanned air system (sUAS), a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a UFV 102 may fly through a fluid (e.g., the earth's atmosphere or the air), through at least a partial vacuum (e.g., space or near-earth orbit), a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram 200 of example realizations for at least one UFV in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 2, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 200 may include at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) 102, at least one fixed wing UFV 102a, at least one rotary wing UFV 102b, at least one ornithopter UFV 102c, at least one lighter-than-air (LTA) UFV 102d, at least one tilt-wing UFV 102e, at least one hybrid UFV 102f, or at least one other type of UFV 102g. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, a UFV 102 may be realized as described by any one or more of the examples in this paragraph. First, a UFV 102 may be realized as a fixed wing UFV 102a, such as a propeller-driven biplane or a jet plane. Second, a UFV 102 may be realized as a rotary wing UFV 102b, such as a helicopter or a gyrodyne. Third, a UFV 102 may be realized as an ornithopter UFV 102c, such as small craft that has flapping wings like an animal (e.g., like a dragonfly, bee, bird, or bat, etc.). Fourth, a UFV 102 may be realized as an LTA UFV 102d, such as a blimp, a balloon, or a dirigible. Fifth, a UFV 102 may be realized as a tilt-wing UFV 102e, such as a propeller-driven airplane with wings that rotate at least during vertical takeoff or landing. Sixth, a UFV 102 may be realized as a hybrid UFV 102f that combines one or more capabilities or structural characteristics of at least one fixed wing UFV 102a, at least one rotary wing UFV 102b, at least one ornithopter UFV 102c, at least one LTA UFV 102d, at least one tilt-wing UFV 102e, or at least one other UFV 102g. Seventh, a UFV 102 may be realized as an other type of UFV 102g, such as a tilt-rotor craft, a submarine, a rocket, a spaceship, a satellite, a vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) craft, a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, a UFV 102 may additionally or alternatively be realized so as to have one or more features, capabilities, structural characteristics, or a combination thereof, etc. as described by any one or more of the examples in this paragraph. First, a UFV 102 may include one rotor, two rotors (e.g., in a tandem, transverse, coaxial, or intermeshing, etc. configuration), three rotors, four rotors (e.g., a quadcopter, or a quadrotor, etc.), a combination thereof, or so forth. Second, a UFV 102 may include a propeller engine, a jet engine, an electric engine, a rocket engine, a ramjet or scramjet engine, a combination thereof, or so forth. Third, a UFV 102 may have at least one wing (e.g., a monoplane, a biplane, or a triplane, etc. in a stacked or tandem wing configuration), which may include a straight wing, a swept wing, a delta wing, a variable sweep wing, a combination thereof, or so forth. Fourth, a UFV 102 may be realized as having a fuselage, as having a flying wing structure, as having a blended-wing body, a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIGS. 3A-3C are schematic diagrams 300A-300C, respectively, of example UFV hazard handling scenarios or environments in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIGS. 3A-3C, by way of example but not limitation, each of schematic diagrams 300A-300C may include at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) 102, at least one remote UFV 102R, or ground 304. In each scenario or environment of schematic diagrams 300A-300C, at least one UFV 102 may be flying above ground 304 and endeavoring to detect, sense, avoid, manage, mitigate, communicate about, coordinate over, eliminate, predict, remove, account for, remedy aftermath caused by, cooperate to address, or a combination thereof, etc. at least one hazard. For certain example embodiments, hazards may include, but are not limited to, other unoccupied flying vehicles, occupied flying vehicles, ground 304, buildings or other structures (not shown) on ground 304, moving objects, weather conditions, stationary objects, some combination thereof, or so forth. A UFV 102 may be attempting to accomplish a mission, an objective, a task, a combination thereof, or so forth. In operation, a UFV may be in communication with at least one remote UFV, at least one pilot-occupied flying vehicle (POFV), at least one base station (not shown in FIG. 3A), at least one other entity, a combination thereof, or so forth. Although scenarios or environments of schematic diagrams 300A-300C may be shown in the drawings or described herein individually or separately, at least portions or aspects of such scenarios or environments may be implemented or may otherwise occur at least partially jointly, simultaneously in time, overlapping in space, as part of a single or extended operational theater, a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram 300A of an example UFV hazard handling scenario or environment in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 3A, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 300A may include at least one UFV 102, at least one remote UFV 102R, at least one pilot-occupied flying vehicle (POFV) 302, or ground 304. More specifically, schematic diagram 300A may include a POFV 302, a first POFV 302(1), or a second POFV 302(2). For certain example embodiments, a POFV 302 may comprise or include a vehicle that is currently being controlled by an onboard human pilot. For certain example embodiments, ground 304 may include or comprise at least a portion of the earth, a landscape, a cityscape, a prairie, a hill, a mountain, a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 3B is a schematic diagram 300B of another example UFV hazard handling scenario or environment in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 3B, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 300B may include at least one UFV 102, at least one remote UFV 102R, ground 304, or at least one base station 306. More specifically, schematic diagram 300B may include a remote UFV 102R, a first remote UFV 102R(1), or a second remote UFV 102R(2). For certain example embodiments, a base station 306 may comprise or include a machine that is adapted to at least partially control or is capable of controlling a UFV 102 from a distance via at least one wireless communication (not explicitly shown in FIG. 3B). For certain example implementations, a base station 306 may be fixed within a building or on a mobile ground vehicle, may be capable of being hand-held, may be incorporated into or as part of another flying vehicle, a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, a base station 306 may include or comprise a handheld controller (e.g., as may be used with an R/C model plane) for actual or near line-of-sight control, a workstation-sized or brief-case-sized controller that is mobile for operation out in the field (e.g., for police or corporate purposes), a larger apparatus that is typically stationary or may be housed in a secret or private building miles from an operational theater (e.g., for military or governmental purposes), a server-sized or distributed apparatus that provides control for a swarm of UFVs (e.g., for careful monitoring of a construction, agricultural, or warehouse site), some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a base station 306 may be controlling at least one UFV, such as first remote UFV 102R(1) or second remote UFV 102R(2), while not controlling at least one other UFV, such as UFV 102 or remote UFV 102R (although it may be monitoring a UFV without controlling it). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 3C is a schematic diagram 300C of another example UFV hazard handling scenario or environment in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 3C, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 300C may include at least one UFV 102, at least one remote UFV 102R, at least one POFV 302, ground 304, at least one base station 306, at least one communication 308, or at least one flight path 312. More specifically, UFV 102 may include at least one UFV hazard handling module 310, or communication 308 may include at least one transmission 308T or at least one reception 308R. For certain example embodiments, a UFV 102 may transmit at least one transmission 308T to or receive at least one reception 308R from at least one of a remote UFV 102R, a POFV 302, a base station 306, a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a UFV hazard handling module 310 may affect or at least partially control a flight path of a UFV 102 at least partially based on at least one of a transmission 308T or a reception 308R. For certain example embodiments, a flight path 312 may comprise or include any one or more of: a flight trajectory, a heading, a speed, a direction, a velocity, an acceleration, a position, an altitude, a stability level, a destination, a two-dimensional course or a three-dimensional course through air or space, a course through a spherical geometrical space, a time or times at which a course is to be traversed, a time or times at which one or more positions or one or more altitudes are to be attained, a time or times at which other flight characteristic(s) are to be attained, extrapolated position-time stamp pairs based on current flight characteristic(s), extrapolated altitude-time stamp pairs based on current flight characteristic(s), a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, a remote UFV 102R, a POFV 302, or a base station 306 may participate in at least one communication 308, such as a transmission 308T or a reception 308R, with at least one UFV 102. Although not explicitly shown in schematic diagram 300C, for certain example embodiments, each of remote UFV 102R, POFV 302, or base station 306 may additionally or alternatively exchange at least one communication 308 with at least one other of remote UFV 102R, POFV 302, or base station 306. For certain example implementations, a remote UFV 102R may transmit at least one transmission 308T to or receive at least one reception 308R from at least one of a UFV 102, another remote UFV 102R, a POFV 302, a base station 306, a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, a POFV 302 may transmit at least one transmission 308T to or receive at least one reception 308R from at least one of a UFV 102, a remote UFV 102R, another POFV 302, a base station 306, a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, a base station 306 may transmit at least one transmission 308T to or receive at least one reception 308R from at least one of a UFV 102, a remote UFV 102R, a POFV 302, another base station 306, a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram 400 of an example unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) including one or more example components in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 4, a UFV 102 may include one or more components such as: at least one processor 402, one or more media 404, logic 406, circuitry 408, at least one communication interface 410, at least one interconnect 412, at least one power source 414, at least one motility mechanism 416, one or more sensors 418, some combination thereof, or so forth. Furthermore, as shown in schematic diagram 400, one or more media 404 may include one or more instructions 420, at least one hazard handling 422 routine, one or more flight attributes 424, some combination thereof, or so forth; a communication interface 410 may include at least one wireless communication interface 410a, at least one wired communication interface 410b, some combination thereof, or so forth; or a motility mechanism 416 may include at least one power train 416a, at least one steering assembly 416b, some combination thereof, or so forth. However, a UFV 102 may alternatively include more, fewer, or different component(s) from those that are illustrated without departing from claimed subject matter.
For certain example embodiments, a UFV 102 may include or comprise at least one machine that is capable of flight, flight control processing, (local) flight control, some combination thereof, or so forth. UFV 102 may include, for example, a computing platform or any electronic device having at least one processor or memory. Processor 402 may include, by way of example but not limitation, any one or more of a general-purpose processor, a specific-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a processing unit, some combination thereof, or so forth. A processing unit may be implemented, for example, with one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), DSPs, digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors generally, processing cores, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, some combination thereof, or so forth. Media 404 may bear, store, contain, include, provide access to, or a combination thereof, etc. instructions 420, which may be executable by a processor 402; at least one hazard handling 422 routine, which may at least partially form at least a portion of instructions 420; one or more flight attributes 424; some combination thereof; or so forth. Instructions 420 may include or comprise, by way of example but not limitation, a program, a module, an application or app (e.g., that is native, that runs in a browser, that runs within a virtual machine, or a combination thereof, etc.), an operating system, or a combination thereof, etc. or portion thereof; operational data structures; source code, object code, just-in-time (JIT) compiled code, or a combination thereof, etc.; processor-executable instructions; other code; some combination thereof; or so forth. Media 404 may include, by way of example but not limitation, processor-accessible or non-transitory media (e.g., memory, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), flash memory, hard drives, disk-based media, disc-based media, magnetic storage, optical storage, volatile memory, nonvolatile memory, or a combination thereof, etc.) that is capable of bearing instructions, one or more hazard handling routines, one or more flight attributes, some combination thereof, or so forth.
For certain example embodiments, execution of instructions 420 by one or more processors 402 may transform at least a portion of UFV 102 into a special-purpose computing device, apparatus, platform, some combination thereof, or so forth. Instructions 420 may include, for example, instructions that are capable of realizing at least a portion of one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. A hazard handling 422 routine may include, for example, instructions that are capable of realizing at least a portion of one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings or that are directed toward detecting, sensing, avoiding, managing, mitigating, communicating about, coordinating over, eliminating, predicting, removing, accounting for, remedying aftermath caused by, cooperating to address, or a combination thereof, etc. at least one hazard. A flight attribute 424 may include, for example, data describing or representing at least one flight attribute of a UFV, such as one or more flight characteristics, one or more flight capabilities, a combination thereof, or so forth. Additionally or alternatively, at least a portion of flight attributes 424 may be at least partially accessible to or integrated with hazard handling 422.
For certain example embodiments, logic 406 may include hardware, software, firmware, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, or a combination thereof, etc. that is capable of performing or facilitating performance of flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Circuitry 408 may include hardware, software, firmware, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, or a combination thereof, etc. that is capable of performing or facilitating performance of flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein circuitry 408 includes at least one physical or hardware component or aspect.
For certain example embodiments, one or more communication interfaces 410 may provide one or more interfaces between UFV 102 and another machine or a person/operator. With respect to a person/operator, a communication interface 410 may include, by way of example but not limitation, a screen, a speaker, keys/buttons, a microphone, or other person-device input/output apparatuses. A wireless communication interface 410a or a wired communication interface 410b may also or alternatively include, by way of example but not limitation, a transceiver (e.g., a transmitter or a receiver), a radio, an antenna, a wired interface connector or other similar apparatus (e.g., a network connector, a universal serial bus (USB) connector, a proprietary connector, a Thunderbolt® or Light Peak® connector, or a combination thereof, etc.), a physical or logical network adapter or port, a frequency converter, a baseband processor, a photoreceptor, or a combination thereof, etc. to communicate wireless signals or wired signals via one or more wireless communication links or wired communication links, respectively. Communications with at least one communication interface 410 may enable transmitting, receiving, or initiating of transmissions, just to name a few examples.
For certain example embodiments, at least one interconnect 412 may enable signal communication between or among components of UFV 102. Interconnect 412 may include, by way of example but not limitation, one or more buses, channels, switching fabrics, some combination thereof, or so forth. Although not explicitly illustrated in FIG. 4, one or more components of UFV 102 may be coupled to interconnect 412 via a discrete or integrated interface. By way of example only, one or more interfaces may couple a communication interface 410 or a processor 402 to at least one interconnect 412. For certain example embodiments, at least one power source 414 may provide power to one or more components of UFV 102. Power source 414 may include, by way of example but not limitation, a battery, a power connector, a solar power source or charger, a mechanical power source or charger, a fuel source, a generator, an engine, some combination thereof, or so forth.
For certain example embodiments, at least one sensor 418 may sense, produce, or otherwise provide at least one sensor value. Sensors 418 may include, by way of example only, a camera, a microphone, an accelerometer, a thermometer, a satellite positioning system (SPS) sensor, a barometer, a humidity sensor, a compass, an altimeter, an airspeed detector, a gyroscope, a magnetometer, a pressure sensor, an oscillation detector, a light sensor, an inertial measurement unit (IMU), a tactile sensor, a touch sensor, a flexibility sensor, a microelectromechanical system (MEMS), some combination thereof, or so forth. Values provided by at least one sensor 418 may include, by way of example but not limitation, an image/video, a sound recording, an acceleration value, a temperature, one or more SPS coordinates, a barometric pressure, a humidity level, a compass direction, an altitude, an airspeed, a gyroscopic value, a magnetic reading, a pressure value, an oscillation value, an ambient light reading, inertial readings, touch detections, proximate object location, flex detections, some combination thereof, or so forth.
For certain example embodiments, a motility mechanism 416 may enable UFV 102 to fly, overcome gravitational forces, overcome wind resistance or drag, accelerate, avoid a hazard, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a power train 416a of a motility mechanism 416 may include one or more components that work separately or at least partially together to transform or convert stored energy into kinetic energy in order to propel UFV 102. For certain example implementations, a power train 416a may include at least one engine, at least one transmission, one or more blades or propellers, at least one motor, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a steering assembly 416b of a motility mechanism 416 may include one or more components that work separately or at least partially together to transform propulsive kinetic energy into forward, backward, up, down, right, left, a combination thereof, etc. movement or some other directionality change for a UFV. For certain example implementations, a steering assembly 416b may include at least one aileron, at least one rudder, at least one elevator, one or more blades or propellers, at least one transmission that routes power to different motors or other propulsive components, at least one rotor disk tilter, at least one blade pitch angle changer, or a combination thereof, or so forth. Although illustrated separately in schematic diagram 400, power train 416a and steering assembly 416b may be implemented at least partially jointly to realize motility mechanism 416.
However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, or so forth. For instance, it should be understood that for certain example implementations components that are illustrated separately in FIG. 4 may not necessarily be separate or mutually exclusive. For example, a given component may provide multiple functionalities. By way of example only, a single component such as a photodetector may function as a wireless communication interface 410a or a sensor 418. Additionally or alternatively, one or more instructions 420 may function to realize or embody at least part of hazard handling 422 or flight attributes 424.
It should also be understood that for certain example implementations components that are illustrated in schematic diagram 400 or described herein may or may not be integral with or integrated into or onto a UFV 102. For example, a component may be removably connected to a UFV 102, a component may be wirelessly coupled to a UFV 102, some combination thereof, or so forth. By way of example only, instructions 420 may be stored on a removable card having at least one medium 404. Additionally or alternatively, at least a portion of a motility mechanism 416, such as an engine or a fuel source, may be detachable from or replaceable with a UFV 102. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram 500 of an example base station, which may be in communication with at least one UFV (not shown in FIG. 5), including one or more example components for a base station in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 5, a base station 306 may include one or more components such as: at least one processor 502, one or more media 504, logic 506, circuitry 508, at least one communication interface 510, at least one interconnect 512, at least one power source 514, at least one entity interface 516, some combination thereof, or so forth. Furthermore, as shown in schematic diagram 500, one or more media 504 may include one or more instructions 518, at least one hazard handling 520 routine, at least one flight attribute 522, some combination thereof, or so forth; or communication interface 510 may include at least one wireless communication interface 510a, at least one wired communication interface 510b, some combination thereof, or so forth. However, a base station 306 may alternatively include more, fewer, or different component(s) from those that are illustrated without departing from claimed subject matter.
For certain example embodiments, a base station 306 may include or comprise at least one machine that is capable of flight control processing, (distant) flight control, some combination thereof, or so forth. Base station 306 may include, for example, a computing platform or any electronic device or devices having at least one processor or memory. Processor 502 may include, by way of example but not limitation, any one or more of a general-purpose processor, a specific-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a processing unit, some combination thereof, or so forth. A processing unit may be implemented, for example, with one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), DSPs, digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors generally, processing cores, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, some combination thereof, or so forth. Media 504 may bear, store, contain, include, provide access to, or a combination thereof, etc. instructions 518, which may be executable by a processor 502; at least one hazard handling 520 routine, which may at least partially form at least a portion of instructions 518; one or more flight attributes 522; some combination thereof; or so forth. Instructions 518 may include or comprise, by way of example but not limitation, a program, a module, an application or app (e.g., that is native, that runs in a browser, that runs within a virtual machine or server, or a combination thereof, etc.), an operating system, or a combination thereof, etc. or portion thereof; operational data structures; source code, object code, just-in-time (JIT) compiled code, or a combination thereof, etc.; processor-executable instructions; other code; some combination thereof; or so forth. Media 504 may include, by way of example but not limitation, processor-accessible or non-transitory media (e.g., memory, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), flash memory, hard drives, disk-based media, disc-based media, magnetic storage, optical storage, volatile memory, nonvolatile memory, or a combination thereof, etc.) that is capable of bearing instructions, one or more hazard handling routines, one or more flight attributes, some combination thereof, or so forth.
For certain example embodiments, execution of instructions 518 by one or more processors 502 may transform at least a portion of base station 306 into a special-purpose computing device, apparatus, platform, some combination thereof, or so forth. Instructions 518 may include, for example, instructions that are capable of realizing at least a portion of one or more flow diagrams methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. A hazard handling 520 routine may include, for example, instructions that are capable of realizing at least a portion of one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings and that are directed toward interacting with at least one UFV to facilitate detecting, seeing, avoiding, managing, mitigating, communicating about, coordinating over, eliminating, predicting, removing, accounting for, remedying aftermath caused by, cooperating to address, or a combination thereof, etc. at least one hazard. A flight attribute 522 may include, for example, data describing or representing at least one flight attribute, such as one or more flight characteristics, one or more flight capabilities, a combination thereof, etc. of at least one UFV that base station 306 is communicating with, is at least partially controlling, is monitoring, some combination thereof, or so forth. Additionally or alternatively, at least a portion of flight attributes 522 may be at least partially accessible to or integrated with hazard handling 520.
For certain example embodiments, logic 506 may include hardware, software, firmware, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, or a combination thereof, etc. that is capable of performing or facilitating performance of flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Circuitry 508 may include hardware, software, firmware, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, or a combination thereof, etc. that is capable of performing or facilitating performance of flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein circuitry 508 includes at least one physical or hardware component or aspect.
For certain example embodiments, one or more communication interfaces 510 may provide one or more interfaces between base station 306 and another machine or a person/operator/entity directly or indirectly. A wireless communication interface 510a or a wired communication interface 510b may also or alternatively include, by way of example but not limitation, a transceiver (e.g., a transmitter or a receiver), a radio, an antenna, a wired interface connector or other similar apparatus (e.g., a network connector, a universal serial bus (USB) connector, a proprietary connector, a Thunderbolt® or Light Peak® connector, a gateway, or a combination thereof, etc.), a physical or logical network adapter or port, a frequency converter, a baseband processor, an internet or telecommunications backbone connector, a fiber optic connector, a storage area network (SAN) connector, or a combination thereof, etc. to communicate wireless signals or wired signals via one or more wireless communication links or wired communication links, respectively. Communications with at least one communication interface 510 may enable transmitting, receiving, or initiating of transmissions, just to name a few examples.
For certain example embodiments, at least one interconnect 512 may enable signal communication between or among components of base station 306. Interconnect 512 may include, by way of example but not limitation, one or more buses, channels, switching fabrics, local area networks (LANs), storage area networks (SANs), some combination thereof, or so forth. Although not explicitly illustrated in FIG. 5, one or more components of base station 306 may be coupled to interconnect 512 via a discrete or integrated interface. By way of example only, one or more interfaces may couple a processor 502 or a medium 504 to at least one interconnect 512. For certain example embodiments, at least one power source 514 may provide power to one or more components of base station 306. Power source 514 may include, by way of example but not limitation, a power connector for accessing an electrical grid, a fuel cell, a solar power source, one or more batteries, some combination thereof, or so forth.
For certain example embodiments, an entity interface 516 may enable one or more entities (e.g., a person, a group, an electronic agent, a robotic entity, or a combination thereof, etc.) to provide input to or receive output from base station 306. Interactions between an entity and a base station may relate, by way of example but not limitation, to inputting or outputting instructions, commands, settings, flight characteristics, flight capabilities, some combination thereof, or so forth. Certain entity interfaces 516 may enable both entity input and entity output at base station 306 or over at least one network link.
However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, or so forth. For instance, it should be understood that for certain example implementations components that are illustrated separately in FIG. 5 need not necessarily be separate or mutually exclusive. For example, a given component may provide multiple functionalities. By way of example only, hard-wired logic 506 may form circuitry 508. Additionally or alternatively, a single component such as a connector may function as a communication interface 510 or as an entity interface 516. Additionally or alternatively, one or more instructions 518 may function to realize or embody at least part of hazard handling 520 or flight attributes 522.
It should also be understood that for certain example implementations components that are illustrated in schematic diagram 500 or described herein may not be integral or integrated with a base station 306. For example, a component may be removably connected to a base station 306, a component may be wirelessly coupled to a base station 306, one or more components of a base station 306 may be geographically distributed or separated from one another, some combination thereof, or so forth. By way of example only, instructions 518 may be stored on one medium 504, and flight attributes 522 (or another portion of instructions 518) may be stored on a different medium 504, which may be part or a same server or a part of a different server of, e.g., a server farm. Additionally or alternatively, respective processor-media pairs, if any, may be physically realized on different or respective server blades or server containers for a base station 306 that is implemented on server hardware. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram 600A of an example UFV that has one or more functional modules or one or more operational components in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 6A, example UFV 102 of schematic diagram 600A may include, by way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV hazard handling module 310, at least one communication interface 410, at least one interconnect 412, at least one motility mechanism 416, one or more sensors 418, or at least one UFV flight control module 602. More specifically, communication interface 410 may include at least one radio 604, or so forth; or motility mechanism 416 may include at least one power train 416a, at least one steering assembly 416b, some combination thereof, or so forth. However, a UFV 102 may alternatively include more, fewer, or different module(s) or component(s) from those that are illustrated without departing from claimed subject matter.
For certain example embodiments, a UFV hazard handling module 310 or a UFV flight control module 602 may operate to implement, perform, facilitate performance of, or a combination thereof, etc. one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, modules, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings or that relate to handling an actual or a potential hazard. Example aspects related to hazard handling in a UFV context are described further herein above and below. Although UFV hazard handling module 310 and UFV flight control module 602 are illustrated separately in schematic diagram 600A, they may additionally or alternatively be implemented at least partially in combination, jointly, with an overlapping functionality, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, and by way of example but not limitation, at least a portion of one or more modules (e.g., module 702, module 704, or a combination thereof, etc.) that are described herein below with particular reference to FIG. 7A may be implemented as at least part of UFV hazard handling module 310, as at least part of UFV flight control module 602, some combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, a module of a UFV 102 may include or be comprised of at least one processor (e.g., a processor 402 of FIG. 4, etc.), one or more media (e.g., a medium 404 of FIG. 4, etc.), executable instructions (e.g., processor-executable instructions, instructions 420 of FIG. 4, computer-implementable instructions, etc.) incorporated into one or more media, logic (e.g., logic 406 of FIG. 4, etc.), circuitry (e.g., circuitry 408 of FIG. 4, etc.), other described or illustrated component(s), may be comprised as otherwise described herein, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, one or more modules (e.g., a UFV hazard handling module 310, a UFV flight control module 602, or a combination thereof, etc.) of at least one UFV 102 may function or interoperate with one or more modules of at least one remote UFV 102R, at least one POFV 302, at least one base station 306 (e.g., each of FIGS. 3A-3C or FIG. 6B), or a combination thereof, etc. via at least one radio 604 of UFV 102. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, UFV 102 may be in constant, infrequent, regular, irregular, intermittent, occasional, scheduled, unscheduled, a combination thereof, etc. communication with at least one remote UFV 102R, at least one POFV 302, at least one base station 306, or a combination thereof, etc. via at least one radio 604. One or more sensors 418 or at least one radio 604 may feed sensor readings, telemetry, flight attributes, weather conditions, topographical maps, coordination parameters, one or more automated hazard handling routines, a combination thereof, etc. to UFV hazard handling module 310, UFV flight control module 602, a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, UFV hazard handling module 310 may at least make hazard-related flight control decisions or provide flight control input to UFV flight control module 602 with regard to handling actual or potential hazards. For certain example implementations, UFV flight control module 602 may at least partially make flight control decisions or provide flight control commands to motility mechanism 416 so as to implement flight control decisions, including, by way of example but not limitation, based at least partly on flight control input provided by UFV hazard handling module 310. Additionally or alternatively, a UFV hazard handling module 310 may supply flight control input, including by way of example but not limitation with at least one flight control command, directly (e.g., without routing it first through UFV flight control module 602) to motility mechanism 416. To implement flight control decisions, including flight control commands, motility mechanism 416 may employ power train 416a to provide at least one propulsive force or may employ steering assembly 416b to provide at least one directional change. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram 600B of an example base station that has one or more functional modules or one or more operational components in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 6B, example base station 306 of schematic diagram 600B may include, by way of example but not limitation, at least one communication interface 510, at least one interconnect 512, at least one UFV flight control module 652, at least one sensor 656, at least one UFV flight coordination module 658, or at least one UFV hazard handling module 660. More specifically, communication interface 510 may include at least one radio 654, or so forth. However, a base station 306 may alternatively include more, fewer, or different module(s) or component(s) from those that are illustrated without departing from claimed subject matter. Moreover, module(s) or component(s) that are illustrated in schematic diagram 600B may alternatively or additionally be separate from or non-integrated with a base station 306, such as being external to a housing of or remotely-accessible to a base station 306, for certain example implementations.
For certain example embodiments, a UFV hazard handling module 660, a UFV flight coordination module 658, or a UFV flight control module 652 may operate to implement, perform, facilitate performance of, or a combination thereof, etc. one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, modules, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings or that relate to handling of an actual or a potential hazard. Example aspects related to hazard handling in a UFV context with at least one base station are described further herein above and below. Although UFV hazard handling module 660, UFV flight control module 652, and UFV flight coordination module 658 are illustrated separately in schematic diagram 600B, they may additionally or alternatively be implemented at least partially in combination, jointly, with an overlapping functionality, some combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, a module of a base station 306 may include or be comprised of at least one processor (e.g., a processor 502 of FIG. 5, etc.), one or more media (e.g., a medium 504 of FIG. 5, etc.), executable instructions (e.g., processor-executable instructions, instructions 518 of FIG. 5, computer-implementable instructions, etc.) incorporated into one or more media, logic (e.g., logic 506 of FIG. 5, etc.), circuitry (e.g., circuitry 508 of FIG. 5, etc.), other described or illustrated component(s), may be comprised as otherwise described herein, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, one or more modules (e.g., a UFV hazard handling module 660, a UFV flight control module 652, a UFV flight coordination module 658, or a combination thereof, etc.) of at least one base station 306 may function or interoperate with one or more modules of at least one UFV 102, at least one remote UFV 102R, at least one POFV 302, at least one other base station 306 (e.g., each of FIG. 3A-3C or 6A), or a combination thereof, etc. via at least one radio 654 (or via a wired connection (not explicitly shown in FIG. 6B) of a communication interface 510) of base station 306. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, a base station 306 may be in constant, infrequent, regular, irregular, intermittent, occasional, scheduled, unscheduled, a combination thereof, etc. communication with at least one UFV 102, at least one remote UFV 102R, at least one POFV 302, at least one first UFV, at least one second UFV, at least one other base station 306, or a combination thereof, etc. via at least one radio 654. For certain example implementations, one or more sensors 656 (e.g., such as one or more of example sensor types described herein above with particular reference to sensor 418 (e.g., for a UFV 102 of FIG. 4)) or at least one radio 654 may feed sensor readings, telemetry, flight attributes, weather conditions, topographical maps, coordination parameters, at least one automated hazard handling routine, a combination thereof, etc. to UFV hazard handling module 660, UFV flight control module 652, UFV flight coordination module 658, a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, UFV hazard handling module 660 may at least make hazard-related flight control decisions or provide flight control input to UFV flight control module 652 or UFV flight coordination module 658 with regard to handling actual or potential hazards. For certain example embodiments, UFV flight coordination module 658 may at least make multi-UFV coordination flight control decisions or provide flight control input to UFV flight control module 652 or UFV hazard handling module 660 with regard to coordinating two or more UFVs, with or without involvement by another base station. For certain example embodiments, UFV flight control module 652 may at least partially make flight control decisions or formulate flight control commands (e.g., for transmission via radio 654 to a UFV 102 and possible application to a motility mechanism 416 (e.g., of FIG. 6A) thereof) so as to realize flight control decisions, including, by way of example but not limitation, based at least partly on flight control input provided by at least UFV hazard handling module 660 or UFV flight coordination module 658. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram 700A that includes at least one example machine, such as an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV), that is capable of handling scenarios for automated hazard handling routine activation in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIG. 7A, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 700A includes at least one machine that may include an activation motivation detection module 702 or an automated hazard handling routine activation module 704. More specifically, schematic diagram 700A may include a machine that includes or comprises at least one UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, an activation motivation detection module 702 or an automated hazard handling routine activation module 704 may include or comprise or be realized with at least one processor that executes instructions (e.g., sequentially, in parallel, at least partially overlapping in a time-multiplexed fashion, at least partially across multiple cores, or a combination thereof, etc.) as at least one special-purpose computing component, or otherwise as described herein. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an activation motivation detection module 702 or an automated hazard handling routine activation module 704 may be implemented separately or at least partially jointly or in combination. For certain example implementations, an activation motivation detection module 702 may be configured to detect at least one motivation to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV. For certain example implementations, an automated hazard handling routine activation module 704 may be configured to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of a UFV based at least partially on at least one motivation. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIGS. 7B-7E are schematic diagrams 700B-700E that include at least one example machine and that depict example scenarios for implementing automated hazard handling routine activation in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in FIGS. 7B-7E, by way of example but not limitation, one or more of schematic diagrams 700B-700E may include at least one UFV 102, at least one motivation 708, at least one automated hazard handling routine 710, at least one detection 712, or at least one activation 714. Each of schematic diagrams 700B-700E may include alternative or additional depictions, which may relate to automated hazard handling routine activation, as described herein. In addition to or in alternative to description herein below with specific reference to FIGS. 7B-7E, illustrated aspects of schematic diagrams 700B-700E may be relevant to example description with reference to FIG. 8A-8E, 9A-9B, or 10A. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
As shown in FIG. 7B, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 700B may include at least one UFV 102, at least one motivation 708, at least one automated hazard handling routine 710, at least one detection 712, or at least one activation 714. For certain example embodiments, at least one activation motivation detection module 702 (e.g., of FIG. 7A) of a UFV 102 may effectuate at least one detection 712 of at least one motivation 708 to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine 710. For certain example implementations, at least one motivation 708 may include or comprise at least one reason, at least one stimulus, at least one impetus, at least one justification, at least one incentive, at least one trigger, at least one inducement, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, at least one automated hazard handling routine activation module 704 (e.g., of FIG. 7A) of a UFV 102 may effectuate at least one activation 714 of at least one automated hazard handling routine 710 based at least partially on at least one motivation 708 that is detected. For certain example implementations, at least one automated hazard handling routine 710 may include or comprise at least one automatic approach to avoiding a hazard, at least one programmed response to a potential hazard, at least one electronic control for flight, at least one default procedure for ameliorating or mitigating a hazardous situation, at least one automated mechanism for reducing a likelihood of becoming a hazard, some combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. Additional or alternative description that may be relevant to schematic diagram 700B is provided herein below with particular reference to one or more of any of FIGS. 8A-8E, FIGS. 9A-9B, or FIG. 10A.
As shown in FIG. 7C, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 700C may include at least one UFV 102, at least one motivation 708, at least one automated hazard handling routine 710, at least one detection 712, or at least one activation 714, at least one remote UFV 102R, proximity zone 718, at least one comparison 720, at least one position 722, at least one position 722R, at least one satellite positioning system (SPS) coordinate 724, at least one SPS coordinate 724R, at least one proximity alert 726, at least one base station 306, air traffic coordination unit 728, at least one physical contact 730, at least one object 732, at least one accelerometer 734, at least one contact sensor 736, at least one time 738, at least one identification 740, at least one comparison 742, at least one functionality loss 744, at least one component 746, at least one visual spectrum sensor 748, or at least one SPS unit 750. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. Additional or alternative description that may be relevant to schematic diagram 700C is provided herein below with particular reference to one or more of any of FIGS. 8A-8E, FIGS. 9A-9B, or FIG. 10A.
As shown in FIG. 7D, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 700D may include at least one UFV 102, at least one motivation 708, at least one automated hazard handling routine 710, at least one detection 712, or at least one activation 714, at least one map 754, at least one flight path 756, at least one three-dimensional representation 758, at least one controlled descent 760, at least one broadcast 762, at least one maneuverability quality 764, at least one plan 766, at least one governmental constraint 768, at least one populated area 770, or at least one heat signature 772. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. Additional or alternative description that may be relevant to schematic diagram 700D is provided herein below with particular reference to one or more of any of FIGS. 8A-8E, FIGS. 9A-9B, or FIG. 10A.
As shown in FIG. 7E, by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram 700E may include at least one UFV 102, at least one remote UFV 102R, at least one base station 306, at least one motivation 708, at least one automated hazard handling routine 710, at least one detection 712, or at least one activation 714, at least one received communication 776, at least one sensor 778, at least one deactivation 780, at least one deactivation command 782, at least one authentication 784, at least one verification 786, or at least one deactivation code 788. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. Additional or alternative description that may be relevant to schematic diagram 700E is provided herein below with particular reference to one or more of any of FIGS. 8A-8E, FIGS. 9A-9B, or FIG. 10A.
Following are a series of flowcharts depicting implementations. For ease of understanding, the flowcharts are organized such that the initial flowcharts present implementations via an example implementation and thereafter the following flowcharts present alternate implementations and/or expansions of the initial flowchart(s) as either sub-component operations or additional component operations building on one or more earlier-presented flowcharts. Those having skill in the art will appreciate that the style of presentation utilized herein (e.g., beginning with a presentation of a flowchart(s) presenting an example implementation and thereafter providing additions to and/or further details in subsequent flowcharts) generally allows for a rapid and easy understanding of the various process implementations. In addition, those skilled in the art will further appreciate that the style of presentation used herein also lends itself well to modular and/or object-oriented program design paradigms.
FIG. 8A is a flow diagram 800A illustrating an example method for at least one machine with regard to automated hazard handling routine activation in accordance with certain example embodiments. As illustrated, flow diagram 800A may include any of operations 802-804. Although operations 802-804 are shown or described in a particular order, it should be understood that methods may be performed in alternative manners without departing from claimed subject matter, including, but not limited to, with a different order or number of operations or with a different relationship between or among operations. Also, at least some operation(s) of flow diagram 800A may be performed so as to be fully or partially overlapping with other operation(s). For certain example embodiments, one or more operations of flow diagram 800A may be performed by at least one machine (e.g., a UFV 102 or at least a portion thereof).
For certain example embodiments, a method for hazard handling for an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) (e.g., that includes, involves, addresses, reacts to, or a combination thereof, etc. or other otherwise handles at least one remote UFV 102R, at least one first remote UFV 102R(1), at least one second remote UFV 102R(2), at least one POFV 302, at least one other object that may present a collision risk, at least one weather-related condition, at least one obstacle to a mission objective, at least one hindrance to accomplishing a task, at least one delay to achieving a goal, or a combination thereof, etc.), which method may be at least partially implemented using hardware (e.g., circuitry, at least one processor, processor-accessible memory, at least one module, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a machine such as a UFV, may include an operation 802 or an operation 804. An operation 802 may be directed at least partially to detecting at least one motivation to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect (e.g., ascertain, discover, encounter, identify, spot, determine, or a combination thereof, etc., such as via at least one detection 712) at least one motivation 708 (e.g., a reason, a stimulus, an impetus, a justification, an incentive, a trigger, an inducement, or a combination thereof, etc.) to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine 710 (e.g., at least one automatic approach to avoiding a hazard, at least one programmed response to a potential hazard, at least one electronic control for flight, at least one default procedure for ameliorating or mitigating a hazardous situation, at least one automated mechanism for reducing a likelihood of becoming a hazard, or a combination thereof, etc. that is realized as at least part of at least one module, that is encoded into circuitry, that is being performed by at least part of at least one machine, or a combination thereof, etc.) of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) 102 (e.g., a UAV, an RPV, a UCAV, a UA, an RPA, an ROA, an R/C aircraft, a UAVS, a UAS, an sUAS, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect at least one motivation to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV (e.g., a UAV may discern an impetus to activate a procedure of the UAV that is intended to mitigate or dodge a hazard, such as a proximate UAV or an upcoming edifice). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 804 may be directed at least partially to activating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on the at least one motivation. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may activate (e.g., set in operation, start, put into force, use, enable input into flight control, commence, institute, or a combination thereof, etc., such as via at least one activation 714) at least one automated hazard handling routine 710 of a UFV 102 based at least partially on at least one motivation 708. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may activate the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on the at least one motivation (e.g., a UAV may start or begin relying on a procedure that adjusts a flight path of the UAV to avoid approaching a flight trajectory of a proximate UAV or an upcoming side of an edifice). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIGS. 8B-8E depict example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of FIG. 8A in accordance with certain example embodiments. As illustrated, flow diagrams of FIGS. 8B-8E may include any of the illustrated or described operations. Although operations are shown or described in a particular order or with a particular relationship to one or more other operations, it should be understood that methods may be performed in alternative manners without departing from claimed subject matter, including, but not limited to, with a different order or number of operations or with a different relationship between or among operations (e.g., operations that are illustrated as nested blocks are not necessarily subsidiary operations and may instead be performed independently). Also, at least some operation(s) of flow diagrams of FIGS. 8B-8E may be performed so as to be fully or partially overlapping with other operation(s). For certain example embodiments, one or more operations of flow diagrams 800B-800E (of FIGS. 8B-8E) may be performed by at least one machine (e.g., a UFV 102 or at least a portion thereof).
FIG. 8B illustrates a flow diagram 800B having example operations 810, 812, or 814. For certain example embodiments, an operation 810 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting at least one motivation to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV (of operation 802) includes detecting at least one other UFV within a proximity zone of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect (e.g., via at least one detection 712) at least one other UFV (e.g., a remote UFV 102R) within a proximity zone 718 (e.g., a two-dimensional radius, a three-dimensional radius, a buffer zone, a spatial distance value, a temporal distance value, an indication of a region within which other UFVs are to be considered a potential hazard, an indication of a region within which other UFVs are factored into flight path decisions, a value that is dependent on respective UFV headings, a value that is dependent on respective UFV speeds, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a UFV. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect at least one other UFV within a proximity zone of the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may discover that another UAV is within a given threshold buffer distance, such as one mile or 50 feet, of the UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 812 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting at least one other UFV within a proximity zone of the UFV (of operation 810) includes comparing a position of the UFV with a position of the at least one other UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may compare 720 (e.g., analyze, determine at least one similarity, determine at least one difference, find a Euclidean or spherical distance between, or a combination thereof, etc.) a position 722 (e.g., at least one location above or on the earth; one or more geographical coordinates; one or more satellite positioning service (SPS) coordinates, such as GPS, GLONASS, or Galileo coordinates, that are at least partially determined using at least one satellite; one or more map coordinates; at least one reference to at least one determinable position, such as a landmark, a waypoint, or an address; one or more cardinal directions in degrees/minutes/seconds; at least one longitude or latitude; or a combination thereof; etc.) of a UFV 102 with a position 722R (e.g., at least one location above or on the earth; one or more geographical coordinates; one or more satellite positioning service (SPS) coordinates, such as GPS, GLONASS, or Galileo coordinates, that are at least partially determined using at least one satellite; one or more map coordinates; at least one reference to at least one determinable position, such as a landmark, a waypoint, or an address; one or more cardinal directions in degrees/minutes/seconds; at least one longitude or latitude; or a combination thereof; etc.) of at least one other UFV 102R. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may compare a position of the UFV with a position of the at least one other UFV. (e.g., a UAV may compare a first location corresponding to its position with a second location corresponding to a position of another UAV to determine if a distance between the first location and the second location is less than a minimum threshold buffer distance, such as 100 feet or 1000 meters). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 814 may be directed at least partially to wherein the comparing a position of the UFV with a position of the at least one other UFV (of operation 812) includes comparing one or more satellite positioning system (SPS) coordinates corresponding to the position of the UFV with one or more SPS coordinates corresponding to the position of the at least one other UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may compare 720 one or more satellite positioning system (SPS) coordinates 724 (e.g., one or more coordinates that are at least partially determined using at least one satellite, GPS coordinates, GLONASS coordinates, Galileo coordinates, or a combination thereof, etc.) corresponding to a position 722 of a UFV 102 with one or more SPS coordinates 724R (e.g., one or more coordinates that are at least partially determined using at least one satellite, GPS coordinates, GLONASS coordinates, Galileo coordinates, or a combination thereof, etc.) corresponding to a position 722R of at least one other UFV 102R. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may compare one or more SPS coordinates corresponding to the position of the UFV with one or more SPS coordinates corresponding to the position of the at least one other UFV. (e.g., a UAV may use first GPS coordinates of a first location corresponding to its position and second GPS coordinates of a second location corresponding to a position of another UAV to determine if a distance between the first and the second GPS coordinates is less than a government-instituted threshold buffer distance, such as 20 feet or 500 meters). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 8C illustrates a flow diagram 800C having example operations 810 (which is described herein above with particular reference to at least FIG. 8B), 818, 820, 822, or 824. For certain example embodiments, an operation 818 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting at least one other UFV within a proximity zone of the UFV (of operation 810) includes receiving at the UFV at least one proximity alert with respect to the at least one other UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may receive at a UFV 102 at least one proximity alert 726 (e.g., a transmitted alarm, a wireless signal, a message, a UFV flight coordination communication, or a combination thereof, etc. that indicates that at least one UFV is within a proximity zone 718—e.g., a two-dimensional radius, a three-dimensional radius, a buffer zone, a spatial distance value, a temporal distance value, an indication of a region within which other UFVs are to be considered a potential hazard, an indication of a region within which other UFVs are factored into flight path decisions, a value that is dependent on respective UFV headings, a value that is dependent on respective UFV speeds, or a combination thereof, etc.) with respect to at least one other UFV 102R. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may receive at the UFV at least one proximity alert with respect to the at least one other UFV. (e.g., a UAV may receive a communication, such as a message or a signal, indicative that another UAV generically or another UAV that is specifically identified is within a minimum threshold buffer of the UAV, which minimum threshold buffer may be based on spatial distance between two or more vehicles or on temporal distance that may be impacted by directional headings or relative speeds of two or more vehicles). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 820 may be directed at least partially to wherein the receiving at the UFV at least one proximity alert with respect to the at least one other UFV (of operation 818) includes receiving at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from the at least one other UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may receive at a UFV 102 at least one proximity alert 726 from at least one other UFV 102R. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may receive at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from the at least one other UFV. (e.g., a UAV may receive a communication from a particular UAV that indicates that the particular UAV is within a minimum threshold buffer distance from the UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 822 may be directed at least partially to wherein the receiving at the UFV at least one proximity alert with respect to the at least one other UFV (of operation 818) includes receiving at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from a base station that is associated with the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may receive at a UFV 102 at least one proximity alert 726 from a base station 306 that is associated with (e.g., corresponds to, is related to, is linked to, is empowered to control, is capable of adjusting a flight path of, or a combination thereof, etc.) UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may receive at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from a base station that is associated with the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may receive a communication from a base station that is capable of sending controlling signals to the UAV, with the communication indicative that the UAV is less than a first threshold buffer distance from at least one other UAV—if the UAV continues to get closer, it may receive another communication indicative that the UAV is now less than a second, smaller threshold buffer distance from the at least one other UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 824 may be directed at least partially to wherein the receiving at the UFV at least one proximity alert with respect to the at least one other UFV (of operation 818) includes receiving at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from an air traffic coordination unit. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may receive at a UFV 102 at least one proximity alert 726 from an air traffic coordination unit 728 (e.g., a multi-UFV base station 306, a tower or antenna and associated circuitry for coordinating UFVs in the vicinity of the tower or antenna, an apparatus deployed in the field at least proximate to a region for which the apparatus is responsible for coordinating UFV flight traffic, a privately-owned apparatus, an apparatus owned by an industry consortium, a government-provided apparatus—such as one placed into service or monitored by the FAA, an apparatus that is at least partly remote from a region having UFVs to be coordinated—such as one that is accessible via the internet or one or more telecommunications networks, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may receive at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from an air traffic coordination unit. (e.g., a UAV may receive a communication from an air traffic coordination unit that is designed to at least coordinate UAV air traffic across multiple UAVs, including UAVs having different operators or owners, with the received communication indicative that the UAV is less than a particular threshold buffer distance that is applicable to UAVs flying in a particular region that is associated with the air traffic coordination unit). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 8D illustrates a flow diagram 800D having example operations 828, 830, 832, 834, or 836. For certain example embodiments, an operation 828 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting at least one motivation to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV (of operation 802) includes detecting physical contact with at least one object. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect (e.g., via at least one detection 712) physical contact 730 (e.g., physical touch, graze, sideswipe, collision, impact, scrape, hit, bump, crash, or a combination thereof, etc.) with at least one object 732 (e.g., another UFV, a POFV, a building, a fence, a tower, a hill, a billboard, a mountain, a land vehicle such as a car or bus or truck, a wall, a tree, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect physical contact with at least one object. (e.g., a UAV may discern that the UAV has impacted, touched, grazed, collided with, or a combination thereof, etc. at least one object, such as another UAV, a building, a person, a car, a hillside, a tower, or a combination thereof, etc.). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 830 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting physical contact with at least one object (of operation 828) includes detecting the physical contact with the at least one object using at least one accelerometer. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect physical contact 730 with at least one object 732 using at least one accelerometer 734 (e.g., a device that measures acceleration, proper acceleration, g-force acceleration, or a combination thereof, etc.; a single-axis accelerometer; a multi-axis accelerometer; a piezoelectric accelerometer; a capacitive accelerometer; a micro electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) accelerometer; some combination thereof; or so forth). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect the physical contact with the at least one object using at least one accelerometer. (e.g., a UAV may detect that it has impacted a building if a negative acceleration value obtained via at least one accelerometer exceeds a specified negative acceleration threshold). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 832 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting physical contact with at least one object (of operation 828) includes detecting the physical contact with the at least one object using at least one contact sensor. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect physical contact 730 with at least one object 732 using at least one contact sensor 736 (e.g., a device that senses mechanical contact and produces a signal responsive thereto, a tactile sensor, a sensor with haptic perception, a physical switch sensor, a whisker sensor, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect the physical contact with the at least one object using at least one contact sensor. (e.g., a UAV may detect that it has impacted a tower if a contact switch or whisker mounted on an exterior of the UAV is tripped or triggered). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 834 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting physical contact with at least one object (of operation 828) includes detecting the physical contact with at least one other UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect physical contact 730 with at least one other UFV (e.g., with a remote UFV 102R as an object 732). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect the physical contact with at least one other UFV. (e.g., a UAV may detect that it has at least grazed or bumped another UAV while both UAVs are in flight). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 836 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting the physical contact with at least one other UFV (of operation 834) includes identifying the at least one other UFV via at least one comparison including at least one time corresponding to at least one contact detection by the at least one other UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may identify 740 (e.g., select from between or among two or more options, determine an alphanumeric designation, differentiate from between or among two or more UFV possibilities, determine at least an approximate location of a UFV, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one other (or remote) UFV 102R (with which physical contact 730 is detected) via at least one comparison 742 (e.g., analyze, determine at least one similarity, determine at least one difference, find a length of time between, or a combination thereof, etc.) including at least one time 738 corresponding to at least one contact detection by at least one other (or remote) UFV 102R. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may identify the at least one other UFV via at least one comparison including at least one time corresponding to at least one contact detection by the at least one other UFV. (e.g., a UAV may identify a particular UAV that it sideswiped by matching a time noted by another UAV that experienced contact, which noted time may be explicitly included in or may be inferred from a broadcast UAV contact inquiry received by the UAV, to a time recorded by the UAV as a result of its own contact detection). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 8E illustrates a flow diagram 800E having example operations 840, 842, 844, or 846. For certain example embodiments, an operation 840 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting at least one motivation to activate at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV (of operation 802) includes detecting at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting hazard detection. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect (e.g., via at least one detection 712) at least a partial (e.g., loss of one of multiple features or capabilities, reduction in efficacy beyond a threshold, complete destruction, inability to diagnose health of a component, or a combination thereof, etc.) loss of functionality 744 (e.g., inability to attain a desired sensor reading, inability to achieve a goal, inability to accept or respond to command inputs, imprecise readings, lack of ability to fulfill intended purpose or expected capability, or a combination thereof, etc.) for at least one component 746 (e.g., any one or more of components described hereinabove with particular reference to FIG. 4 or 6A, such as a part of a power train 416a, a part of a steering assembly 416b, a visual sensor, a wind speed sensor, a navigational sensor, a control module, or a combination thereof, etc.) that is capable of supporting hazard detection (e.g., that may facilitate or enable the addressing, reacting to, or a combination thereof, etc. or other otherwise handling at least one remote UFV 102R, at least one first remote UFV 102R(1), at least one second remote UFV 102R(2), at least one POFV 302, at least one other object that may present a collision risk, at least one weather-related condition, at least one obstacle to a mission objective, at least one hindrance to accomplishing a task, at least one delay to achieving a goal, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting hazard detection. (e.g., a UAV may run a diagnostic that determines a high likelihood that a particular component of the UAV is not functioning within safe or accurate or recommended operating parameters or may realize that control circuitry is no longer receiving output or responses from a particular component). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 842 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting hazard detection (of operation 840) includes detecting the at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one visual spectrum sensor of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect at least a partial loss of functionality 744 for at least one visual spectrum sensor 748 (e.g., a device that converts an optical image into an electronic signal, an imaging sensor, a charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor, a camera, a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) sensor, a pixel sensor, an analog sensor, a digital sensor, a sensor that is capable of detecting electromagnetic waves in a human-perceptible visual spectrum, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect the at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one visual spectrum sensor of the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may detect that a directional or focusing capability of at least one camera has ceased to function, with the at least one camera ordinarily usable by a remote human pilot to identify hazards to the UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 844 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting hazard detection (of operation 840) includes detecting the at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one satellite positioning system (SPS) unit of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect at least a partial loss of functionality 744 for at least one satellite positioning system (SPS) unit 750 (e.g., a device that is capable of converting one or more signals from one or more satellites into one or more positional coordinates; a device that is capable of generating GPS, GLONASS, or Galileo coordinates; a device that can provide at least part of an SPS positional fix; or a combination thereof; etc.) of a UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect the at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one SPS unit of the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may detect that a GPS chip is no longer providing a GPS fix to a navigation module). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 846 may be directed at least partially to wherein the detecting at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting hazard detection (of operation 840) includes detecting the at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one radio of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may detect at least a partial loss of functionality 744 for at least one radio 604 (e.g., a device that utilizes wireless transmission of signals through free space by electromagnetic radiation at one or more frequencies below that of visible light, an aircraft radio, a radio for an R/C vehicle, a radio that utilizes VHF radio spectrum allocated to civil aviation communication, a short-range radio, a Wi-Fi radio, a Wi-Maxx radio, a Bluetooth radio, a long-range radio, a mobile phone transceiver, an LTE chip, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may detect the at least a partial loss of functionality for at least one radio of the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may detect that it cannot receive a signal via a short-range radio (e.g., a Bluetooth or Wi-Fi capable transceiver, which may be used for inter-UFV communications for local inter-UFV flight coordination) even if a longer-range radio continues to function). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIGS. 9A-9B depict example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of FIG. 8A in accordance with certain example embodiments. As illustrated, flow diagrams of FIGS. 9A-9B may include any of the illustrated or described operations. Although operations are shown or described in a particular order or with a particular relationship to one or more other operations, it should be understood that methods may be performed in alternative manners without departing from claimed subject matter, including, but not limited to, with a different order or number of operations or with a different relationship between or among operations (e.g., operations that are illustrated as nested blocks are not necessarily subsidiary operations and may instead be performed independently). Also, at least some operation(s) of flow diagrams of FIGS. 9A-9B may be performed so as to be fully or partially overlapping with other operation(s). For certain example embodiments, one or more operations of flow diagrams 900A-900B (of FIGS. 9A-9B) may be performed by at least one machine (e.g., a UFV 102 or at least a portion thereof).
FIG. 9A illustrates a flow diagram 900A having example operations 910, 912, 914, or 916. For certain example embodiments, an operation 910 may be directed at least partially to wherein the activating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on the at least one motivation (of operation 804) includes consulting at least one map to adjust at least one flight path of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may consult (e.g., review, refer to, inspect, utilize data from, apply information garnered from, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one map 754 (e.g., terrain description, visual or symbolic representation of an area, a navigational aid depicting geography—such as natural attributes of land or man-made structures, or a combination thereof, etc.) to adjust (e.g., change, decrease speed or altitude of, increase speed or altitude of, change direction for, replace, cause a deviation in, adapt, modify, alter, deviate from, add something to, take something away from, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one flight path 756 (e.g., a heading, a flight trajectory, a position, an altitude, a speed, a direction a velocity, an acceleration, a stability level, a destination, a course through air or space or a time at which the course is to be traversed, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may consult at least one map to adjust at least one flight path of the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may refer to a topographical map to determine whether to climb in altitude or veer left or right to avoid an upcoming hill). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 912 may be directed at least partially to wherein the consulting at least one map to adjust at least one flight path of the UFV (of operation 910) includes inspecting the at least one map to ascertain at least one three-dimensional representation of one or more hazards to adjust the at least one flight path of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may inspect (e.g., study, analyze, extract information from, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one map 754 to ascertain (e.g., determine, discover, acquire, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one three-dimensional representation 758 (e.g., a description including more than two dimensions, an indication of height of topography or buildings, a set of electronic coordinates in X-Y-Z directions for at least one object located on a map, or a combination thereof, etc.) of one or more hazards (e.g., at least one object that may present a collision risk, at least one weather-related condition, at least one other flying vehicle, at least one physical obstacle to a mission objective, at least one building or tower, or a combination thereof, etc.) to adjust at least one flight path of a UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may inspect the at least one map to ascertain at least one three-dimensional representation of one or more hazards to adjust the at least one flight path of the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may analyze an electronic map to extract one or more indicators of coordinates that indicate positions in space of a set of buildings, including corners thereof, so that the UAV can plot a course safely through the set of buildings). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 914 may be directed at least partially to wherein the activating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on the at least one motivation (of operation 804) includes beginning a controlled descent responsive at least partly to activation of the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may begin a controlled descent 760 (e.g., a reduction in altitude under operation of a flight control module, a descent that retards gravity's attraction, a setting or establishment of a flight path toward the earth, or a combination thereof, etc.) responsive at least partly to activation (e.g., via at least one activation 714) of at least one automated hazard handling routine 710 of a UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may begin a controlled descent responsive at least partly to activation of the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may, upon an unexpected activation of self-guided flight, begin to descend toward the earth aiming for a sufficiently-sized flat piece of land that is not currently blocked by other objects). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 916 may be directed at least partially to wherein the activating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on the at least one motivation (of operation 804) includes broadcasting at least one indication of a maneuverability quality corresponding to the UFV responsive at least partly to activation of the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may broadcast 762 (e.g., transmit in the open, send without encryption, communicate to multiple recipients, transmit for possible unknown potential recipients, communicate without knowing if all relevant receivers are known a priori, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one indication of a maneuverability quality 762 (e.g., (1) a label or value representative of how well a UFV can adjust its flight path; (2) a relative indication; (3) an absolute indication; (4) a score; (5) a class—like a regulatory certification class for (5a) meeting at least one predetermined maneuverability criterion, such as hovering, acceleration, minimum velocity, stability in particular weather conditions, or a combination thereof, etc., (5b) comportment with a set of construction or feature regulations for a craft type, (5c) a label equating to a set of minimal standards to achieve the label, or (5d) some combination thereof, etc.—; (6) a rating—like an industry certification rating for (6a) meeting at least one predetermined maneuverability criterion, such as hovering, acceleration, minimum velocity, stability in particular weather conditions, or a combination thereof, etc., (6b) comportment with a set of flight capabilities, (6c) a grade representing a maneuvering score achieved by a make or model of a vehicle, (6d) a title equating to a set of minimal standards, such as a minimum negative acceleration, to earn the title, or (6e) some combination thereof, etc.—; (7) a level; (8) an indication of a degree to which a vehicle is agile; (9) a craft category, such as fixed wing, rotary wing, LTA, ornithopter, or a combination thereof, etc.; (10) some combination thereof; or so forth) corresponding to a UFV 102 responsive at least partly to activation of at least one automated hazard handling routine 710 of UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may broadcast at least one indication of a maneuverability quality corresponding to the UFV responsive at least partly to activation of the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may begin transmitting to UAVs within radio signal range a class name of a vehicle class to which the UAV belongs, such as LTA or rotating wing). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 9B illustrates a flow diagram 900B having example operations 920, 922, 924, or 926. For certain example embodiments, an operation 920 may be directed at least partially to wherein the activating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on the at least one motivation (of operation 804) includes preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on one or more governmental constraints. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may prepare (e.g., construct, formulate, produce, generate, assemble, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one plan 766 (e.g., scheme, stratagem, course of action, intention, aim, or a combination thereof, etc.) for at least one flight path 756 (e.g., a heading, a flight trajectory, a position, an altitude, a speed, a direction a velocity, an acceleration, a stability level, a destination, a course through air or space or a time at which the course is to be traversed, or a combination thereof, etc.) for a UFV 102 based at least partially on one or more governmental constraints 768 (e.g., rules, regulations, laws, ordnances, limitations, restrictions, requirements, guidelines, obligations, mandates, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may prepare at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on one or more governmental constraints. (e.g., a UAV may determine a flight path adjustment to avoid violating one or more FAA flight constraints for the area it is in or the type of craft that it is). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 922 may be directed at least partially to wherein the preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on one or more governmental constraints (of operation 920) includes preparing the at least one plan for the at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on at least one of (i) one or more speed limits or (ii) one or more altitude restrictions. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may prepare (e.g., construct, formulate, produce, generate, assemble, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one plan 766 (e.g., scheme, stratagem, course of action, intention, aim, or a combination thereof, etc.) for at least one flight path 756 (e.g., a heading, a flight trajectory, a position, an altitude, a speed, a direction a velocity, an acceleration, a stability level, a destination, a course through air or space or a time at which the course is to be traversed, or a combination thereof, etc.) for a UFV 102 based at least partially on at least one of (i) one or more speed limits (e.g., maximum permitted air speed, velocity restriction, minimum air speed, recommended speed, speed limit based at least partly on altitude, speed limit based at least partly on location, speed limit based at least partly on craft type, or a combination thereof, etc.) or (ii) one or more altitude restrictions (e.g., minimum permitted altitude, approved altitude range, altitude requirement based partly on speed, altitude obligation based partly on location, altitude constraint based on craft type, maximum permissible height above the earth, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may prepare the at least one plan for the at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on at least one of (i) one or more speed limits or (ii) one or more altitude restrictions. (e.g., a UAV may plan a course through upcoming terrain that stays below current airspeed limits, which may be “posted” via electronic broadcasts, and that stays above FAA-promulgated minimum altitude requirements). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 924 may be directed at least partially to wherein the activating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on the at least one motivation (of operation 804) includes preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on at least one populated area. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may prepare (e.g., construct, formulate, produce, generate, assemble, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one plan 766 (e.g., scheme, stratagem, course of action, intention, aim, or a combination thereof, etc.) for at least one flight path 756 (e.g., a heading, a flight trajectory, a position, an altitude, a speed, a direction a velocity, an acceleration, a stability level, a destination, a course through air or space or a time at which the course is to be traversed, or a combination thereof, etc.) for a UFV 102 based at least partially on at least one populated area 770 (e.g., an area with people, a region with relatively high population density, an area with homes, a neighborhood as opposed to an empty field, a town as opposed to countryside, an apartment building as opposed to a parking lot, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may prepare at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on at least one populated area. (e.g., a UAV may formulate a flight trajectory responsive to, and substantially away from, a location of a subdivision that is identified on a map of surrounding terrain). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 926 may be directed at least partially to wherein the preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on at least one populated area (of operation 924) includes preparing the at least one plan for the at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on one or more areas having at least one heat signature. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may prepare (e.g., construct, formulate, produce, generate, assemble, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one plan 766 (e.g., scheme, stratagem, course of action, intention, aim, or a combination thereof, etc.) for at least one flight path 756 (e.g., a heading, a flight trajectory, a position, an altitude, a speed, a direction a velocity, an acceleration, a stability level, a destination, a course through air or space or a time at which the course is to be traversed, or a combination thereof, etc.) for a UFV 102 based at least partially on one or more areas (e.g., region, territory, identifiable portion of geography, a city, a neighborhood, a block, a building, a house, a car, or a combination thereof, etc.) having at least one heat signature 772 (e.g., a shape or size or intensity of increased warmth relative to surroundings, a shape or size consistent with a human, a size or intensity consistent with a group of humans, a shape or size consistent with an automobile, a shape or size or intensity consistent with a human dwelling, a detectable level of heat that matches a human activity, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may prepare the at least one plan for the at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on one or more areas having at least one heat signature. (e.g., a UAV may make a flight control decision to steer away from an area that registers heat above a certain level or that registers heat greater than a threshold differential from surround heat levels as detectable via an onboard infrared sensor). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
FIG. 10A depicts example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of FIG. 8A in accordance with certain example embodiments. As illustrated, a flow diagram of FIG. 10A may include any of the illustrated or described operations. Although operations are shown or described in a particular order or with a particular relationship to one or more other operations, it should be understood that methods may be performed in alternative manners without departing from claimed subject matter, including, but not limited to, with a different order or number of operations or with a different relationship between or among operations (e.g., operations that are illustrated as nested blocks are not necessarily subsidiary operations and may instead be performed independently). Also, at least some operation(s) of a flow diagram of FIG. 10A may be performed so as to be fully or partially overlapping with other operation(s). For certain example embodiments, one or more operations of flow diagram 1000A (of FIG. 10A) may be performed by at least one machine (e.g., a UFV 102 or at least a portion thereof).
FIG. 10A illustrates a flow diagram 1000A having an example operation 806. For certain example embodiments, an operation 806 may be directed at least partially to wherein a method further includes implementing one or more additional operations. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may implement one or more operations in addition to detecting (of operation 802) or activating (of operation 804). Example additional operations may include, by way of example but not limitation, 1010, 1012, 1014, or 1016 (of FIG. 10A).
FIG. 10A illustrates a flow diagram 1000A having example operations 1010, 1012, 1014, 1016, or 1018. For certain example embodiments, an operation 1010 may be directed at least partially to wherein a method of detecting (of operation 802) or activating (of operation 804) further includes (at additional operation 806) attempting to communicate with a base station that is associated with the UFV via at least one other UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may attempt to communicate with (e.g., send a message to, receive an instruction from, exchange telemetry or control signals with, or a combination thereof, etc.) a base station 306 that is associated with (e.g., corresponds to, is related to, is linked to, is empowered to control, is capable of adjusting a flight path of, or a combination thereof, etc.) a UFV 102 via at least one other UFV (e.g., a remote UFV 102R). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may attempt to communicate with a base station that is associated with the UFV via at least one other UFV. (e.g., a UAV that has lost contact with its base station may attempt to route a communication through another UAV, which other UAV is closer to or otherwise capable of communicating with, the base station of the UAV, thereby using the other UAV as an intermediary or relay). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 1012 may be directed at least partially to wherein a method of detecting (of operation 802) or activating (of operation 804) further includes (at additional operation 806) obeying a received communication indicative that at least one particular sensor of the UFV is not to be employed by the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may obey (e.g., abide by, follow, adhere to, implement, or a combination thereof, etc.) a received communication 776 (e.g., a message, a signal, a packet, a beacon, or a combination thereof, etc.) indicative that at least one particular sensor 778 (e.g., a visual camera, an infrared camera, a receiver, a particular kind of radio, a GPS receiver, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a UFV 102 is not to be employed (e.g., turned on, made active, utilized, used in a recording mode, deployed for data that is to be retained, used outside of what is required for safe navigation, or a combination thereof, etc.) by UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may obey a received communication indicative that at least one particular sensor of the UFV is not to be employed by the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may follow a communication that is received from a ground location, such as a particular company's private and confidential research facility, with the received communication including a standardized command instructing UAVs in the area that they are not permitted to image the ground with a camera sensor). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 1014 may be directed at least partially to wherein a method of detecting (of operation 802) or activating (of operation 804) further includes (at additional operation 806) deactivating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on at least one deactivation command received from a base station that is associated with the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may deactivate 780 (e.g., cease applying, turn off, shut down, discontinue use of, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one automated hazard handling routine 710 of a UFV 102 based at least partially on at least one deactivation command 782 (e.g., instruction, order, signal, message, or a combination thereof, etc.) received from a base station 306 that is associated with (e.g., corresponds to, is related to, is linked to, is empowered to control, is capable of adjusting a flight path of, or a combination thereof, etc.) UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may deactivate the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on at least one deactivation command received from a base station that is associated with the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may deactivate an onboard collision avoidance system responsive at least partly to a command to deactivate the collision avoidance system that is received from a base station that has authority to adjust a flight path of the UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 1016 may be directed at least partially to wherein the deactivating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on at least one deactivation command received from a base station that is associated with the UFV (of operation 1014) includes authenticating that the at least one deactivation command was formulated by the base station that is associated with the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may authenticate 784 (e.g., determine truth of, ascertain if alleged origin is accurate, ensure purported identity is actual identity, or a combination thereof, etc.) that at least one deactivation command 782 (e.g., instruction, order, signal, message, or a combination thereof, etc.) was formulated (e.g., prepared, constructed, created, generated, or a combination thereof, etc.) by a base station 306 that is associated with (e.g., corresponds to, is related to, is linked to, is empowered to control, is capable of adjusting a flight path of, or a combination thereof, etc.) a UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may authenticate that the at least one deactivation command was formulated by the base station that is associated with the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may analyze a received deactivation command—such as by considering a submitted password or application of a cryptographic key—to ensure that it was created by a base station having flight control authority over the UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation 1018 may be directed at least partially to wherein the deactivating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on at least one deactivation command received from a base station that is associated with the UFV (of operation 1014) includes verifying that the at least one deactivation command references at least one deactivation code that originated from the base station that is associated with the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may verify 786 (e.g., prove truth of, ensure truth via consideration of evidence, validate, confirm, or a combination thereof, etc.) that at least one deactivation command 782 (e.g., instruction, order, signal, message, or a combination thereof, etc.) references (e.g., includes, links to, provides a mechanism to access, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one deactivation code 788 (e.g., a value, a set of alphanumeric characters, a cryptographic key, an encoded value, or a combination thereof, etc.) that originated (e.g., was created at, was generated for, is assigned to, or a combination thereof, etc.) from a base station 306 that is associated with (e.g., corresponds to, is related to, is linked to, is empowered to control, is capable of adjusting a flight path of, or a combination thereof, etc.) a UFV 102. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may verify that the at least one deactivation command references at least one deactivation code that originated from the base station that is associated with the UFV. (e.g., a UAV may analyze a received deactivation command—such as by considering a submitted password or application of a cryptographic key—to validate that the command includes a deactivation code that was generated at or assigned to a base station having flight control authority over the UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation may be directed at least partially to adjusting a flight path of a UFV based at least partially on the one or more flight attributes received from the remote UFV including adjusting the flight path of the UFV based at least partially on at least one negotiation that includes at least the UFV and the remote UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may adjust (e.g., change, deviate to accommodate a negotiated option, adopt a negotiated option that has been agreed to, alter to avoid a path the other has agreed to adopt, or a combination thereof, etc.) a flight path of a UFV 102 based at least partially on at least one negotiation (e.g., an offer and an acceptance (such as an acknowledgment), an offer and a rejection, an offer and a counter-offer, a suggestion for an alteration to a planned course, an exchange of signals, a swapping of offers or intentions, or a combination thereof, etc.) that includes at least UFV 102 and a remote UFV 102R. By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may adjust the flight path of the UFV based at least partially on at least one negotiation that includes at least the UFV and the remote UFV (e.g., a local UAV may descend and accelerate based at least partly on the local UAV transmitting to the remote UAV a flight trajectory that is desired by the local UAV and the local UAV receiving from the remote UAV an acknowledgment or a non-conflicting flight trajectory that is intended by the remote UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
For certain example embodiments, an operation may be directed at least partially to wherein the adjusting the flight path of the UFV based at least partially on at least one negotiation that includes at least the UFV and the remote UFV includes exchanging between or among at least the UFV and the remote UFV one or more flight path adjustment options. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may exchange (e.g., send and receive, send and receive an acknowledgment, receive and send an acknowledgment, send one and receive one, or a combination thereof, etc.) between or among at least a UFV 102 and a remote UFV 102R one or more flight path adjustment options 738 (e.g., suggestions, requests, offers, possibilities, or a combination thereof, etc. pertaining to a change in speed, a change in direction, a change in destination, a positive acceleration, a negative acceleration, an alteration to flight trajectory, a delay in effecting a previously-planned flight path, a change in altitude, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV may exchange between or among at least the UFV and the remote UFV one or more flight path adjustment options (e.g., a local UAV may send a prospective local flight path adjustment for the local UAV to a remote UAV, and the local UAV may receive from the remote UAV a prospective remote flight path adjustment for the remote UAV or a revised, suggested prospective local fight path adjustment for the local UAV that the remote UAV would prefer). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the foregoing specific exemplary processes and/or machines and/or technologies are representative of more general processes and/or machines and/or technologies taught elsewhere herein, such as in the claims filed herewith and/or elsewhere in the present application.
Those having skill in the art will recognize that the state of the art has progressed to the point where there is little distinction left between hardware, software, and/or firmware implementations of aspects of systems; the use of hardware, software, and/or firmware is generally (but not always, in that in certain contexts the choice between hardware and software can become significant) a design choice representing cost vs. efficiency tradeoffs. Those having skill in the art will appreciate that there are various vehicles by which processes and/or systems and/or other technologies described herein can be effected (e.g., hardware, software, and/or firmware), and that the preferred vehicle will vary with the context in which the processes and/or systems and/or other technologies are deployed. For example, if an implementer determines that speed and accuracy are paramount, the implementer may opt for a mainly hardware and/or firmware vehicle; alternatively, if flexibility is paramount, the implementer may opt for a mainly software implementation; or, yet again alternatively, the implementer may opt for some combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. Hence, there are several possible vehicles by which the processes and/or devices and/or other technologies described herein may be effected, none of which is inherently superior to the other in that any vehicle to be utilized is a choice dependent upon the context in which the vehicle will be deployed and the specific concerns (e.g., speed, flexibility, or predictability) of the implementer, any of which may vary. Those skilled in the art will recognize that optical aspects of implementations will typically employ optically-oriented hardware, software, and or firmware.
In some implementations described herein, logic and similar implementations may include software or other control structures. Electronic circuitry, for example, may have one or more paths of electrical current constructed and arranged to implement various functions as described herein. In some implementations, one or more media may be configured to bear a device-detectable implementation when such media hold or transmit device detectable instructions operable to perform as described herein. In some variants, for example, implementations may include an update or modification of existing software or firmware, or of gate arrays or programmable hardware, such as by performing a reception of or a transmission of one or more instructions in relation to one or more operations described herein. Alternatively or additionally, in some variants, an implementation may include special-purpose hardware, software, firmware components, and/or general-purpose components executing or otherwise invoking special-purpose components. Specifications or other implementations may be transmitted by one or more instances of tangible transmission media as described herein, optionally by packet transmission or otherwise by passing through distributed media at various times.
Alternatively or additionally, implementations may include executing a special-purpose instruction sequence or invoking circuitry for enabling, triggering, coordinating, requesting, or otherwise causing one or more occurrences of virtually any functional operations described herein. In some variants, operational or other logical descriptions herein may be expressed as source code and compiled or otherwise invoked as an executable instruction sequence. In some contexts, for example, implementations may be provided, in whole or in part, by source code, such as C++, or other code sequences. In other implementations, source or other code implementation, using commercially available and/or techniques in the art, may be compiled/implemented/translated/converted into a high-level descriptor language (e.g., initially implementing described technologies in C or C++ programming language and thereafter converting the programming language implementation into a logic-synthesizable language implementation, a hardware description language implementation, a hardware design simulation implementation, and/or other such similar mode(s) of expression). For example, some or all of a logical expression (e.g., computer programming language implementation) may be manifested as a Verilog-type hardware description (e.g., via Hardware Description Language (HDL) and/or Very High Speed Integrated Circuit Hardware Descriptor Language (VHDL)) or other circuitry model which may then be used to create a physical implementation having hardware (e.g., an Application Specific Integrated Circuit). Those skilled in the art will recognize how to obtain, configure, and optimize suitable transmission or computational elements, material supplies, actuators, or other structures in light of these teachings.
The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes via the use of block diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples. Insofar as such block diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those within the art that each function and/or operation within such block diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. In one embodiment, several portions of the subject matter described herein may be implemented via Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), digital signal processors (DSPs), or other integrated formats. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that some aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein, in whole or in part, can be equivalently implemented in integrated circuits, as one or more computer programs running on one or more computers (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more computer systems), as one or more programs running on one or more processors (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more microprocessors), as firmware, or as virtually any combination thereof, and that designing the circuitry and/or writing the code for the software and or firmware would be well within the skill of one of skill in the art in light of this disclosure. In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanisms of the subject matter described herein are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that an illustrative embodiment of the subject matter described herein applies regardless of the particular type of signal bearing medium used to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of a signal bearing medium include, but are not limited to, the following: a recordable type medium such as a floppy disk, a hard disk drive, a Compact Disc (CD), a Digital Video Disk (DVD), a digital tape, a computer memory, etc.; and a transmission type medium such as a digital and/or an analog communication medium (e.g., a fiber optic cable, a waveguide, a wired communications link, a wireless communication link (e.g., transmitter, receiver, transmission logic, reception logic, etc.), etc.).
In a general sense, those skilled in the art will recognize that the various aspects described herein which can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, and/or any combination thereof can be viewed as being composed of various types of “electrical circuitry.” Consequently, as used herein “electrical circuitry” includes, but is not limited to, electrical circuitry having at least one discrete electrical circuit, electrical circuitry having at least one integrated circuit, electrical circuitry having at least one application specific integrated circuit, electrical circuitry forming a general purpose computing device configured by a computer program (e.g., a general purpose computer configured by a computer program which at least partially carries out processes and/or devices described herein, or a microprocessor configured by a computer program which at least partially carries out processes and/or devices described herein), electrical circuitry forming a memory device (e.g., forms of memory (e.g., random access, flash, read only, etc.)), and/or electrical circuitry forming a communications device (e.g., a modem, communications switch, optical-electrical equipment, etc.). Those having skill in the art will recognize that the subject matter described herein may be implemented in an analog or digital fashion or some combination thereof.
Modules, logic, circuitry, hardware and software combinations, firmware, or so forth may be realized or implemented as one or more general-purpose processors, one or more processing cores, one or more special-purpose processors, one or more microprocessors, at least one Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), at least one Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), at least one digital signal processor (DSP), some combination thereof, or so forth that is executing or is configured to execute instructions, a special-purpose program, an application, software, code, some combination thereof, or so forth as at least one special-purpose computing apparatus or specific computing component. One or more modules, logic, or circuitry, etc. may, by way of example but not limitation, be implemented using one processor or multiple processors that are configured to execute instructions (e.g., sequentially, in parallel, at least partially overlapping in a time-multiplexed fashion, at least partially overlapping across multiple cores, or a combination thereof, etc.) to perform a method or realize a particular computing machine. For example, a first module may be embodied by a given processor executing a first set of instructions at or during a first time, and a second module may be embodied by the same given processor executing a second set of instructions at or during a second time. Moreover, the first and second times may be at least partially interleaved or overlapping, such as in a multi-threading, pipelined, or predictive processing environment. As an alternative example, a first module may be embodied by a first processor executing a first set of instructions, and a second module may be embodied by a second processor executing a second set of instructions. As another alternative example, a particular module may be embodied partially by a first processor executing at least a portion of a particular set of instructions and embodied partially by a second processor executing at least a portion of the particular set of instructions. Other combinations of instructions, a program, an application, software, or code, etc. in conjunction with at least one processor or other execution machinery may be utilized to realize one or more modules, logic, or circuitry, etc. to implement any of the processing algorithms described herein.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that at least a portion of the devices and/or processes described herein can be integrated into a data processing system. Those having skill in the art will recognize that a data processing system generally includes one or more of a system unit housing, a video display device, memory such as volatile or non-volatile memory, processors such as microprocessors or digital signal processors, computational entities such as operating systems, drivers, graphical user interfaces, and applications programs, one or more interaction devices (e.g., a touch pad, a touch screen, an antenna, etc.), and/or control systems including feedback loops and control motors (e.g., feedback for sensing position and/or velocity; control motors for moving and/or adjusting components and/or quantities). A data processing system may be implemented utilizing suitable commercially available components, such as those typically found in data computing/communication and/or network computing/communication systems.
For the purposes of this application, “cloud” computing may be understood as described in the cloud computing literature. For example, cloud computing may be methods and/or systems for the delivery of computational capacity and/or storage capacity as a service. The “cloud” may refer to one or more hardware and/or software components that deliver or assist in the delivery of computational and/or storage capacity, including, but not limited to, one or more of a client, an application, a platform, an infrastructure, and/or a server The cloud may refer to any of the hardware and/or software associated with a client, an application, a platform, an infrastructure, and/or a server. For example, cloud and cloud computing may refer to one or more of a computer, a processor, a storage medium, a router, a switch, a modem, a virtual machine (e.g., a virtual server), a data center, an operating system, a middleware, a firmware, a hardware back-end, a software back-end, and/or a software application. A cloud may refer to a private cloud, a public cloud, a hybrid cloud, and/or a community cloud. A cloud may be a shared pool of configurable computing resources, which may be public, private, semi-private, distributable, scaleable, flexible, temporary, virtual, and/or physical. A cloud or cloud service may be delivered over one or more types of network, e.g., a mobile communication network, and the Internet.
As used in this application, a cloud or a cloud service may include one or more of infrastructure-as-a-service (“IaaS”), platform-as-a-service (“PaaS”), software-as-a-service (“SaaS”), and/or desktop-as-a-service (“DaaS”). As a non-exclusive example, IaaS may include, e.g., one or more virtual server instantiations that may start, stop, access, and/or configure virtual servers and/or storage centers (e.g., providing one or more processors, storage space, and/or network resources on-demand, e.g., EMC and Rackspace). PaaS may include, e.g., one or more software and/or development tools hosted on an infrastructure (e.g., a computing platform and/or a solution stack from which the client can create software interfaces and applications, e.g., Microsoft Azure). SaaS may include, e.g., software hosted by a service provider and accessible over a network (e.g., the software for the application and/or the data associated with that software application may be kept on the network, e.g., Google Apps, SalesForce). DaaS may include, e.g., providing desktop, applications, data, and/or services for the user over a network (e.g., providing a multi-application framework, the applications in the framework, the data associated with the applications, and/or services related to the applications and/or the data over the network, e.g., Citrix). The foregoing is intended to be exemplary of the types of systems and/or methods referred to in this application as “cloud” or “cloud computing” and should not be considered complete or exhaustive.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that it is common within the art to implement devices and/or processes and/or systems, and thereafter use engineering and/or other practices to integrate such implemented devices and/or processes and/or systems into more comprehensive devices and/or processes and/or systems. That is, at least a portion of the devices and/or processes and/or systems described herein can be integrated into other devices and/or processes and/or systems via a reasonable amount of experimentation. Those having skill in the art will recognize that examples of such other devices and/or processes and/or systems might include—as appropriate to context and application—all or part of devices and/or processes and/or systems of (a) an air conveyance (e.g., an airplane, rocket, helicopter, etc.), (b) a ground conveyance (e.g., a car, truck, locomotive, tank, armored personnel carrier, etc.), (c) a building (e.g., a home, warehouse, office, etc.), (d) an appliance (e.g., a refrigerator, a washing machine, a dryer, etc.), (e) a communications system (e.g., a networked system, a telephone system, a Voice over IP system, etc.), (f) a business entity (e.g., an Internet Service Provider (ISP) entity such as Comcast Cable, Qwest, Southwestern Bell, etc.), or (g) a wired/wireless services entity (e.g., Sprint, Cingular, Nextel, etc.), etc.
In certain cases, use of a system or method may occur in a territory even if components are located outside the territory. For example, in a distributed computing context, use of a distributed computing system may occur in a territory even though parts of the system may be located outside of the territory (e.g., relay, server, processor, signal-bearing medium, transmitting computer, receiving computer, etc. located outside the territory). A sale of a system or method may likewise occur in a territory even if components of the system or method are located and/or used outside the territory. Further, implementation of at least part of a system for performing a method in one territory does not preclude use of the system in another territory.
One skilled in the art will recognize that the herein described components (e.g., operations), devices, objects, and the discussion accompanying them are used as examples for the sake of conceptual clarity and that various configuration modifications are contemplated. Consequently, as used herein, the specific exemplars set forth and the accompanying discussion are intended to be representative of their more general classes. In general, use of any specific exemplar is intended to be representative of its class, and the non-inclusion of specific components (e.g., operations), devices, and objects should not be taken limiting.
With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations are not expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
The herein described subject matter sometimes illustrates different components contained within, or connected with, different other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures may be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedial components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected”, or “operably coupled,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality, and any two components capable of being so associated can also be viewed as being “operably couplable,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality. Specific examples of operably couplable include but are not limited to physically mateable and/or physically interacting components, and/or wirelessly interactable, and/or wirelessly interacting components, and/or logically interacting, and/or logically interactable components.
In some instances, one or more components may be referred to herein as “configured to,” “configured by,” “configurable to,” “operable/operative to,” “adapted/adaptable,” “able to,” “conformable/conformed to,” etc. Those skilled in the art will recognize that such terms (e.g. “configured to”) can generally encompass active-state components and/or inactive-state components and/or standby-state components, unless context requires otherwise.
This application may make reference to one or more trademarks, e.g., a word, letter, symbol, or device adopted by one manufacturer or merchant and used to identify and distinguish his or her product from those of others. Trademark names used herein are set forth in such language that makes clear their identity, that distinguishes them from common descriptive nouns, that have fixed and definite meanings, and, in many if not all cases, are accompanied by other specific identification using terms not covered by trademark. In addition, trademark names used herein have meanings that are well-known and defined in the literature, and do not refer to products or compounds protected by trade secrets in order to divine their meaning. All trademarks referenced in this application are the property of their respective owners, and the appearance of one or more trademarks in this application does not diminish or otherwise adversely affect the validity of the one or more trademarks. All trademarks, registered or unregistered, that appear in this application are assumed to include a proper trademark symbol, e.g., the circle R or [trade], even when such trademark symbol does not explicitly appear next to the trademark. To the extent a trademark is used in a descriptive manner to refer to a product or process, that trademark should be interpreted to represent the corresponding product or process as of the date of the filing of this patent application.
While particular aspects of the present subject matter described herein have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that, based upon the teachings herein, changes and modifications may be made without departing from the subject matter described herein and its broader aspects and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as are within the true spirit and scope of the subject matter described herein. It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to claims containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations). Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, and C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). In those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, or C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that typically a disjunctive word and/or phrase presenting two or more alternative terms, whether in the description, claims, or drawings, should be understood to contemplate the possibilities of including one of the terms, either of the terms, or both terms unless context dictates otherwise. For example, the phrase “A or B” will be typically understood to include the possibilities of “A” or “B” or “A and B.”
With respect to the appended claims, those skilled in the art will appreciate that recited operations therein may generally be performed in any order. Also, although various operational flows are presented in a sequence(s), it should be understood that the various operations may be performed in other orders than those which are illustrated, or may be performed concurrently. Examples of such alternate orderings may include overlapping, interleaved, interrupted, reordered, incremental, preparatory, supplemental, simultaneous, reverse, or other variant orderings, unless context dictates otherwise. Furthermore, terms like “responsive to,” “related to,” or other past-tense adjectives are generally not intended to exclude such variants, unless context dictates otherwise.
While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.

## Claims

1. An unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) comprising: at least one electronic device including at least:
circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters;
circuitry configured for autonomously detecting at least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation based at least partially on autonomous performance of the at least one diagnostic test;
circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV including at least preparing at least one request to adjust a flight path based at least partially on the autonomously detecting at least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation, transmitting the at least one request to the at least one remote UFV, and receiving at least one response to the at least one request from the at least one remote UFV; and
circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment.

2. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation further includes:
at least one of:
circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least one other UFV within a proximity zone of the UFV;
circuitry configured for comparing a position of the UFV with a position of the at least one other UFV; or
circuitry configured for comparing one or more positioning system (PS) coordinates corresponding to the position of the UFV with one or more PS coordinates corresponding to the position of the at least one other UFV.

3. The UFV of claim 2, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least one other UFV within a proximity zone of the UFV comprises:
at least one of:
circuitry configured for receiving at the UFV at least one proximity alert with respect to the at least one other UFV;
circuitry configured for receiving at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from the at least one other UFV;
circuitry configured for receiving at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from a base station that is associated with the UFV; or
circuitry configured for receiving at the UFV the at least one proximity alert from an air traffic coordination unit.

4. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard detection handling operation further includes:
at least one of:
circuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one object;
circuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one object using at least one accelerometer;
circuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one object using at least one contact sensor;
circuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one other UFV; or
circuitry configured for detecting physical contact with at least one other UFV including at least circuitry configured for identifying the at least one other UFV via at least one comparison including at least one time corresponding to at least one contact detection by the at least one other UFV.

5. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation further comprises:
circuitry configured for detecting the at least partial loss of functionality for at least one visual spectrum sensor of the UFV.

6. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation further comprises:
circuitry configured for detecting the at least partial loss of functionality for at least one positioning system (PS) unit of the UFV.

7. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation further comprises:
circuitry configured for detecting the at least partial loss of functionality for at least one radio of the UFV.

8. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes:
at least one of:
circuitry configured for consulting at least one map to adjust at least one flight path of the UFV; or
circuitry configured for inspecting at least one map to ascertain at least one three-dimensional representation of one or more hazards to adjust the at least one flight path of the UFV.

9. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes:
circuitry configured for beginning a controlled descent responsive at least partly to activation of the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV.

10. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes:
circuitry configured for broadcasting at least one indication of a maneuverability quality corresponding to the UFV responsive at least partly to activation of the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV.

11. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes:
at least one of:
circuitry configured for preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on one or more governmental constraints or
circuitry configured for preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on at least one of (i) one or more speed limits or (ii) one or more altitude restrictions.

12. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously activating the at least one automated hazard handling operation including at least the negotiated flight path adjustment includes:
at least one of:
circuitry configured for preparing at least one plan for at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on at least one populated area; or
circuitry configured for preparing at least one plan for the at least one flight path for the UFV based at least partially on one or more areas having at least one heat signature.

13. The UFV of claim 1, further comprising:
circuitry configured for attempting to communicate with a base station that is associated with the UFV via at least one other UFV.

14. The UFV of claim 1, further comprising:
circuitry configured for obeying a received communication indicative that at least one particular sensor of the UFV is not to be employed by the UFV.

15. The UFV of claim 1, further comprising:
circuitry configured for deactivating the at least one automated hazard handling routine of the UFV based at least partially on at least one deactivation command received from a base station that is associated with the UFV including at least one of:
circuitry configured for authenticating that the at least one deactivation command was formulated by the base station that is associated with the UFV; or
circuitry configured for verifying that the at least one deactivation command references at least one deactivation code that originated from the base station that is associated with the UFV.

16. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously detecting least partial loss of functionality for at least one component that is capable of supporting at least one automated hazard handling operation comprises:
circuitry configured for detecting that a directional or focusing capability of at least one camera has ceased to function, with the at least one camera ordinarily usable by a remote human pilot to identify hazards to the UFV.

17. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within at least one of safe, accurate, or recommended operating parameters.

18. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a power train of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters.

19. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a steering assembly of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters.

20. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a wind speed sensor of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters.

21. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a control module of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters.

22. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a positioning system (PS) of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is no longer providing a positioning fix to the UFV.

23. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that a component of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is not functioning within predetermined operating parameters comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously performing at least one diagnostic test that determines likelihood that at least one wireless communication device of an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) is no longer receiving communication signals.

24. The UFV of claim 1 further comprising:
circuitry configured for obtaining an indication of at least one hazard associated with at least one mission including at least the UFV and at least one remote UFV.

25. The UFV of claim 24, wherein the circuitry configured for obtaining an indication of at least one hazard associated with at least one mission including at least the UFV and at least one remote UFV comprises:
circuitry configured for receiving an indication of at least one hazard via at least one communication transmission.

26. The UFV of claim 24, wherein the circuitry configured for obtaining an indication of at least one hazard associated with at least one mission including at least the UFV and at least one remote UFV comprises:
circuitry configured for sensing one or more of sensor readings, telemetry signals, or flight attributes; and
circuitry configured for determining an indication of at least one hazard based at least partially one the one or more of sensor readings, telemetry signals, or flight attributes.

27. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV wherein the UFV descends and accelerates based at least partly on the UFV transmitting to the at least one remote UFV a flight trajectory that is desired by the UFV and the UFV receiving from the at least one remote UFV an acknowledgment or a non-conflicting flight trajectory that is intended by the at least one remote UFV.

28. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV wherein the UFV exchanges among the at least one remote UFV one or more flight path adjustment options.

29. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV wherein the UFV sends a prospective local flight path adjustment for the UFV to the at least one remote UFV, and the UFV receives from the at least one remote UFV a prospective remote flight path adjustment for the at least one remote UFV or a revised suggested prospective local fight path adjustment for the UFV that the at least one remote UFV would prefer.

30. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV including at least preparing at least one of an offer and an acceptance, an offer and an acceptance an acknowledgment, an offer and a rejection, an offer and a counter-offer, a suggestion for an alteration to a planned course, an exchange of signals, or a swapping of offers or intentions associated with adjusting the flight path based at least partially on the autonomously analyzing the one or more flight attributes received from the at least one remote UFV and the indication of at least one hazard associated with at least one mission including at least the UFV and the at least one remote UFV, transmitting the at least one request to the at least one remote UFV, and receiving at least one response to the at least one request from the at least one remote UFV.

31. The UFV of claim 1, wherein the circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with at least one remote UFV comprises:
circuitry configured for autonomously negotiating a flight path adjustment with the at least one remote UFV wherein the UFV receives at least one current GPS coordinate of the at least one remote UFV from the at least one remote UFV after having sent a request to the at least one remote UFV requesting the at least one current GPS coordinate.