alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premiere Global Services,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned  Michael E. Havener,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                /s/ Michael E. Havener
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael E. Havener
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                Premiere Global Services, Inc.
                                                November 8, 2007
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 12

                                 MICROTUNE, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES

                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three Months
                                           Ended March
                                             31, 2002          2001           2000           1999            1998           1997
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
<S>                                        <C>              <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>
Loss before provision for income taxes      $  (13,117)     $  (64,373)    $  (29,760)    $   (8,508)     $   (3,487)    $   (2,406)
  Add: Estimate of interest within
         rental expense (1)                        298             755            696             38              21             23
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
              Total loss                    $  (12,819)     $  (63,618)    $  (29,064)    $   (8,470)     $   (3,466)    $   (2,383)
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
  DIVIDENDS
  Fixed charges-estimate of interest
    within rental expense (1)               $      298      $      755     $      696     $       38      $       21     $       23
    Preferred stock dividends                       --              --             --             --             811          4,183
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
Total fixed charges and preferred
  stock dividends                           $      298      $      755     $      696     $       38      $      832     $    4,206
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
Deficiency of total earnings to fixed
  charges                                   $  (13,117)     $  (64,373)    $  (29,760)    $   (8,508)     $   (3,487)    $   (2,406)
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
Deficiency of total earnings to fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends       $  (13,117)     $  (64,373)    $  (29,760)    $   (8,508)     $   (4,298)    $   (6,589)
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
</TABLE>

(1) Fixed charges include the estimated interest component of rent expense
included in the loss before provision for income taxes.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pursuant to United States District Court Southern District of Ohio Local Civil Rule 7.3,

Plaintiff Portia Boulger respectfully moves this Court for an extension of seven days, until and 

on September 12, 2017, in which to file an Opposition to Defendant James Woods’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Motion for Dismissal (Doc. No. 16). As directed by 

Local Rule 7.3(a), Plaintiff’s counsel consulted with Defendant’s counsel, and Defendant’s 

counsel does not oppose this request for an extension of time. A proposed order granting this

Motion is attached.

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ N. Zachary West 

 N. Zachary West (0087805) 

511 West First Avenue, Unit 305 

Columbus, Ohio 43215 

Tel: (614) 208-0230 

Email: zachwest@gmail.com 

 

Portia A. Boulger, :

Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:17-cv-186

v. : Judge George C. Smith

James H. Woods, : Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. 

Deavers

Defendant.

:

Case: 2:17-cv-00186-GCS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/30/17 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 159
Joseph E. Sandler (admitted pro hac vice) 

Sandler Reiff Lamb Rosenstein & 

Birkenstock PC 

1090 Vermont Ave., N.W. Suite 750 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Tel: (202) 479-1111 

Fax: (202) 479-1115 

Email: sandler@sandlerreiff.com 

 

Dated: August 29, 2017 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was served 

via this Court’s ECF System, this 29th day of August 2017, upon all counsel of record.

/s/ N. Zachary West

N. Zachary West 

2

Case: 2:17-cv-00186-GCS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/30/17 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 160
2

3

Case: 2:17-cv-00186-GCS-EPD Doc #: 17 Filed: 08/30/17 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 161
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to


§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Gary Pokrassa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gary PokrassaGary PokrassaChief Financial Officer





April 7, 2011
#### Vernon FULMER v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Water Improvement District #5

85-136

692 S.W.2d 246

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered July 8, 1985

*420
      *Guy Jones, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Jesse W. Thompson,*for appellee.

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellant’s property was sold at a commissioner’s sale to satisfy a lien created by his failure to pay a water improvement district assessment. The sale was conducted pursuant to a decree entered March 25,1983. The appellant failed to appeal the decree by lodging the transcript with this court within twenty days as is required by Ark. Stat. Ann. § 20-437 (Repl. 1968). According to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 20-439 (Repl. 1968) he lost the right to appeal by not filing the transcript within the twenty-day period.

On November 18,1984, the appellant moved to set aside the decree on which the sale was based claiming the court lacked jurisdiction because notice had not been given to him in the manner prescribed by Ark. R. Civ. P. 4 and that he had thus been denied due process of law. The motion was denied by the chancellor who found that the required statutory notices were given to the appellant and no due process violation occurred.

The chancellor also found that the appellant had forfeited his right of appeal. The parties have not given us satisfactory briefs on the question of whether the chancellor had the authority to set aside the decree and whether his refusál to do so was an appealable order. We, therefore, choose not to decide that issue but to decide, on its merits, the question whether notice to the appellant was sufficient.

Our jurisdiction is based on Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 29.1 .c. as this case involves interpretation of statutes and a rule of civil procedure.

The record shows notices were given the appellant by publication and by mail as required by Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 20-443 (Repl. 1968) and 20-1156 (Supp. 1983), respectively. Ark. R. Civ. P. 4 does not apply to this sort of special statutory action which contains its own provisions for notice. *See*Ark. R. Civ. P. 81(a).

Nor do we agree that the notice given the appellant *421failed to comport with due process. We agree with the appellant’s argument that he was entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to the entry of a decree requiring sale of his property. The only cases cited by the appellant on this point are *Franklin*v. State, 267 Ark. 311, 590 S.W.2d 28 (1979), and *Roswell*v. *Driver,*268 Ark. 819, 596 S.W.2d 352 (Ark. App. 1980), which, respectively, involved no notice and defectively administered notice. It is clear that the appellant received the two kinds of notice to which the statute entitled him. The appellant makes no showing that the notice was not in accordance with the applicable statutes or otherwise was defective.

Affirmed.

Robert Dudley, Justice, not participating.
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs ) Case No. 3:18PO65

)

)

 Ralph Stodd

 

ORDER TERMINATING PROBATION

 

The above named began probation on April 3, 2019, for a period of two years. Based on the 

recommendation of the U.S. Probation Officer and for good cause shown it is hereby ordered that 

the defendant is discharged from supervised release and that the proceedings in the case be 

terminated.

Dated this day of , 2020 

 

Sharon L. Ovington 

United States Magistrate Judge 

27th

April

Case: 3:18-po-00065-SLO Doc #: 19 Filed: 04/27/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 55
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 12



                       CENCOM CABLE INCOME PARTNERS, L.P.
                 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
                       (In thousands except ratio amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      For the Period From
                                                         January 1 to
                                                        March 28, 1996          For the Years Ended December 31
                                                        --------------          -------------------------------
                                               1997            1996            1995            1994           1993
                                            -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------    ------------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>            <C>              <C>           <C>
Earnings
  Net Income (loss)                            N/A             $1,057         $3,453           $3,811        $3,368
  Fixed Charges                                N/A              1,291          5,581            4,096         3,641
                                            -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------    ------------
       Earnings                                N/A              2,348          9,034            7,907         7,009

Fixed Charges
  Interest Expense                             N/A              1,291          5,403             3842         3,368
 Amortization of debt costs                    N/A              -                178              254           273
                                            ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========    ============
       Total Fixed Charges                     N/A             $1,291         $5,581           $4,096        $3,641
                                            ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========    ============

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges             N/A               1.8             1.6             1.9            1.9
</TABLE>




*Filed herewith.
**EXHIBIT 15**

Bank of America, N.A. as Trustee 

  for the Cross Timbers Royalty Trust: 

We are aware that XTO Energy Inc. has incorporated by reference in itsRegistration Statement Nos. 33-55784 and 333-91460 on Form S-8, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, which includes our report dated April 28, 2006, covering the unaudited interim financialinformation contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within themeaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

KPMG LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

April 28, 2006
## Packing List:

1. DJI Inspire and Case

2. 2 black blades/2 gray blades and spares

3. Charged batteries

4. Charged controller s

5. Memory card s with plenty of space

6. 2x Camera filters (ND & Clear)

7. iPad & DJI Apps & iPad USB cord

8. AND Android & DJI Apps & mini USB cord

9. Camera

10. Micro USB cable and USB micro SD reader

11. Navigate to Planned Flight Area in DJI Pilot Apps to Cache Maps



## Pre

- flight:

1. Check overhead in ALL DIRECTIONS

2. If temperature below 5 °C/41°F add battery insulators (allow time for equipment to acclimate

to outside t emperature)

3. Check Camera filter and install ND/clear (best shutter speed: 30fps=1/60, 24fps=1/48, etc.)

4. Attach iPad or Nexus 9 /Cable to Slave Controller

5. Attach Samsung S5 or Nexus 9 /Cable to Master Controller

6. Enable airplane mode on phone

7. Verify flight mod e P/A/F

8. Set landing gear switch down

9. Power on Master C ontroller

10. Load DJI app

11. Verify map loaded

12. Turn off Wi

- F i on iPad and Android Tablet

13. Adjust antennas vertically

14. Turn Inspire ON (press power button once + press and hold)

15. Exit travel mode

16. Turn Inspire OFF (press power button once + press and hold)

17. Attach Camera and check memory

18. Inspect props

19. Attach props snuggly

20. Lock props

21. Inspect camera mounts

22. Inspire ON

23. Calibrate compass away from phones and large metal/magnetic objects

24. Test Gimbal

- calibrate if necessa ry

25. Set failsafe altitude

26. Set "Return To Home" location (A/C or TX)

27. IMU calibration (.99

- 1.01)

28. Wait at least one minute after full GPS lock before takeoff

29. Power up rotors, allow one minute to warm up if below 5 °C/41°F

30. Select cleanest video channel

31. Take and view a picture

## In

- flight:

1. Hover 20 sec onds at 15

- 25 feet (re

- obtain GPS lock)

2. Check that there is no drifting

3. Chec k all controls (up, down, rotate left, rotate right, left, right, forward, back)

4. Raise landing gear

5. Center/set camera follow mode, etc.

6. Check exposure

7. Start recording



## Landing Checklist:

1. STOP recording

2. Turn Inspire Off

3. Detach camera

4. Detach props & locks

5. Turn Inspire On

6. Enter travel mode via app

7. Turn Inspire Off
Exhibit 10.4
                                  KEY EMPLOYEE
                           PROFIT-SHARING BONUS PLAN


     Participants in this plan are all corporate officers,  by-products manager,
mill general  managers,  timber buyers and mill  controllers.  The bonus will be
computed at each fiscal year end. Bonus amount will be the following percentages
of fiscal year net profit after tax (assuming tax rate of 38%):

                  0% - $0 to  $3,999,999
                  2% - $4,000,000 to $6,000,000
                  4% - $6,000,001 to $8,000,000
                  6% - $8,000,000 to $12,000,000
                  8% - $12,000,000, to $14,000,000
                 10% - $14,000,000 and above

         This plan is not capped by any percentage of salary.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:18-mj-00397-CMV Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 49
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:18-mj-00397-CMV Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 50
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 239 -CR

Da nie l R ayP r uit t , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF MI LAM COUNTY , 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR2160 4 , HO NORAB LE EDWARD P . MAGRE , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Da

niel Ray Pruitt pl eade d g uilty

to th e f t o f p r o p e r ty valued be tween $1,500 and $20,000. See Tex. P enal Code Ann. § 31.03(a) , (e) (4)( A) (West Supp. 2006). The district court
a dju dg e d h im guil ty

and a sse sse d h is p un ish me nt at tw o y e ars ’ i nc arc e ratio n in a state ja il. Ap pe lla nt’ s c ourt -a

pp oin te d atto rn e y

fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ing

that th e a

pp eal is frivolous and without mer it. The brief meets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by

prese nting a

profe ssional evaluation of t h e re co rd demonstrating why there are no arguable g rounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pen so n v. Oh io , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); Hi gh v . S tate , 57 3 S.W. 2d 80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. App . 197 2) ; Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant rece ived a c opy of counse l’s brief a

nd was a dvised of his rig ht to examine the appellate r ecor d and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed.Ap pe lla nt re qu e ste d but wa s not g ive n cr e dit fo r the 25 7 day s b e tw e e n h is i nd ic tme nt i n th is 1 cause and his trial. See Tex. Code Crim. P roc. A nn. art. 42.12, § 15(h) (2) ( West 2006). T he re cord ref lects that duringthis ti me, appe llant was i n prison serving the s entenc e im posed following another felony conviction. Appellant’ s prese ntence incar cer ation was not due to indig ence . Cf
. Ex pa rte Bates , 9 78 S.W. 2d

57 5, 57 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ); Ex par te H ar ris , 9 4 6 S. W. 2 d

7 9 , 8 0 ( T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 97 ); Ho llo way v . S tate , 115 S.W .3d 797, 798 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003, no pet.).

2 We have r eviewe d the re cord a nd counsel’s br ief a

nd ag ree that the a

p p e a l is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the r ecor d that might ar g uably support the appe al. Counsel’s 1 motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: Nove mber 27, 2007 Do No t Pu

bli sh
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |

|                                                                                             |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                             |   |   |   |
| /s**/**Michael              Barth                                                                |   |   |   |
| Michael                BarthChief                Financial OfficerAugust                20, 2007 |   |   |        |
|                                                                                             |   |   |   |

----