61 

Sample Receipt Documentation 

i 

i 

VES019209 
Sample Traceabilaty List 

KDU^§Ab SE63 

9 ^1 ^ 

SLPffe SUZ . B7_ ^ 

BtfWe ^2-12-Slft O 

©Ip^Ip SZl- L $260 

.ECOM 

Site, of Proqram: Veolia ES Tech Sample Date: f^/fa , /2/tf/o ? Project Location: Sauget, IL P.O. if: 

Type of Program: CPT Date Shipped: /a.fiUfa'} Laboratory: Test America, Inc. 

Projects; 60133216 Knoxville, TN 

Program Office: Syracuse NY 

Shipper/ ' ' ' Steven Milo 

Recovery: Jeff Gorman 

Laboratory: Test America, Inc. 

Knoxville, TN 

Program Contact: Jeff Gorman FedEx Air Bill #: 

Item Sample ID Code Sample Matrix Sample Description Analltical Parameters | Special Instructions 

1 HBTU-U4-IVI23A-R1 Liquid High Btu, Unit 4, Run 1 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

2 . HBTU-U4-M23A-R2 Liquid High Btu, Unit 4, Run 2 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

3 HBTU-U4-M23A-R3 Liquid High Btu, Unit 4, Run 3 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

4 1 

5 L.BTU-II4-M23A-R1 Liquid Low Btu, Unit 4 Run 1 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

6 LBTU-U4-M23A-R2 Liquid Low Btu, Unit A Run 2 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

7 LBTU-U4-W123A-R3 Liquid Low Btu, Unit 4 Run 3 Physical Parameters a Cl, Total Chlorine 

8 • i 

9 SF-U4-W123A-R1 Liquid Speciality Feeder, Unit 4, Run 1 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

10 SI--U4-IVI23A-R2 Liquid Specilaity Feeder, Unit 4, Run 2 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

11 SF-U4-M23A-R3 Liquid Speciality Feeder, Unit 4, Run 3 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

12 | 

13 CS-U4-M23A-R1 Solid Containerized Solids, Unit 4, Run 1 Physical Parameters 8. Cl, Total Chlorine 

14 CS-U4-W123A-R2 Solid Containerized Solids, Unit 4, Run 2 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

15 CS-U4-M23A-R3 Solid Containerized Solids, Unit 4, Run 3 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

16 1 

17 BS-U4-M23A-R1 Solid Bulk Solids, Unit 4, Run 1 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

18 BS-U4-M23A-R2 Solid Bulk Solids, Unit 4, Run 2 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

19 BS-U4-M23A-R3 Solid Bulk Solids, Unit 4, Run 3 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

20 1 

Field Notes/ Comments 1 • Physical Parameters = Total chlorides, heat content a ash content. 

2. Cl 

Page 1 of _2 

Relinquished By (print): Date; 

Signature: / Time: 

Relinquished By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Relinquished By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Received by Lab (print): Date; 

Signature; Time; 

Received By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Received By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Received By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Analvtlcal Laboratory Destination: 

Test America Inc. 

5815 Middlebrook Pike 

Knoxville, TN 37921 

Attn: Mr. Kevin Woodcock 865-291-3000 

<3> 

ro 

VES019210 
I AECO M 

Sample Traceafoifity List

 ! 

Site of Program: Veolia ES Tech Sample Date: - |2.IW/o«> Project Location: Sauget, IL P.O. #: 

Type of Program: CPT Date Shipped:' 'fT./lU'/o^ ' Laboratory: TestAmerica, Inc. 

Project*: 60133216 Shipper / Steven Milo Knoxville, TN 

Recovery: Jeff Gorman 

Laboratory: TestAmerica, Inc. 

Knoxville, TN 

Program Office: Syracuse NY 

Shipper / Steven Milo 

Recovery: Jeff Gorman 

Laboratory: TestAmerica, Inc. 

Knoxville, TN 

Program Contact: Jeff Gorman FedEx Air Bill #: 

Item Sample ID Code Sample Matrix 

Liquid 

Sampli 

High Btu, Unit 4. 

i Description Analitlcal Parameters | Special Instructions 

21 HBTU-U4-M26-R1 . 

Sample Matrix 

Liquid 

Sampli 

High Btu, Unit 4. *un 1 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

22 HBTU-U4-IVI26A-R2 . Liquid Higli Btu, Unit 4, Run 2 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

23 HBTU-U4-WI26A-R3 . Liquid High Btu, Unit 4, Run 3 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

24 I 

25 LBTU-U4-M26A-R1 • Liquid Low Btu, Unit 4 Run 1 Physical Parameters a Cl, Total Chlorine 

26 LBTU-U4-M26A-R2 - Liquid Low Btu, Unit 4 Run 2 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

27 LBTU-U4-WI26A-R3 - Liquid Low Btu, Unit 4 Run 3 Physical Parameters a Cl, Total Chlorine 

28 I 

29 SF-U4-M26A-R1 • Liquid Speciality Feeder, Unit 4, Run 1 Physical Parameters a Cl, Total Chlorine 

30 SF-U4-M26A-R2 • Liquid Specilaity Feeder, Unit 4, Run 2 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

31 SF-U4-M26A-R3 ' Liquid Speciality Feeder, Unit 4, Run 3 Physical Parameters a Cl, Total Chlorine 

32 I 

33 CS-U4-IVI26A-R1 Solid Containerized Solids, Unit.4, Run 1 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

34 • CS-U4-M26A-R2 Solid Containerized Solids, Unit 4, Run 2 Physical Parameters a Cl, Total Chlorine 

35 CS-U4-WI26A-R3 Solid Containerized Solids, Unit 4, Run 3 Physical Parameters a Cl, Total Chlorine 

36 | 

37 BS-U4-M26A-RI Solid Bulk Solids, Unit 4, Run 1 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Clilorine 

38 BS-U4-M26A-R2 Solid Bulk Solids, Unit 4, Run 2 Physical Parameters a Cl, Total Chlorine 

39 BS-U4-M26A-R3 Solid Bulk Solids, Unit 4, Run 3 Physical Parameters & Cl, Total Chlorine 

40 • 1 

Field Notes/ Comments 1. Physical Parameters = Total chlorides, heat content & ash content. 

2. Cl 

Page 2 of 2 

Relinquished By (print): Date: 

Signature: , Time: 

Relinquished By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Relinquished By (print); Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Received by Lab (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Received By (print): Date: 

/Signature^ ^ Time: 

Received By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Received By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Received By (print): Date: Analytical Laboratory Destination: 

/Signature^ ^ Time: 

Received By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Received By (print): Date: 

Signature: Time: 

Test America Inc. 

5815 Middlebrook Pike 

Knoxville, TN 37921 

Attn: Mr. Kevin Woodcock 865-291-3000 
TESTAMERIC A KNOXVILL E SAMPL E RECEIPT/CONDITION UPON RECEIPT ANOMAL Y CHECKLIS T 

Lot Number: V\ c\V.^PHf)M 

Review Items Yes 

< 

No NA If No, what was the problem? Comments/Actions Taken 

1. Do sample container labels match COC? 

(IDs, Dates, Times) J 

— I 

• la Do not match COC 

D 1 b Incomplete information 

0 lc Marking smeared 

• Id Label torn 

d i e No label 

O l f COC not received 

• lg Other: 

1 • . Do sample container labels match COC? 

(IDs, Dates, Times) J 

— I 

• la Do not match COC 

D 1 b Incomplete information 

0 lc Marking smeared 

• Id Label torn 

d i e No label 

O l f COC not received 

• lg Other: 

1. Do sample container labels match COC? 

(IDs, Dates, Times) J 

— I 

• la Do not match COC 

D 1 b Incomplete information 

0 lc Marking smeared 

• Id Label torn 

d i e No label 

O l f COC not received 

• lg Other: 

1. Do sample container labels match COC? 

(IDs, Dates, Times) J 

— I 

• la Do not match COC 

D 1 b Incomplete information 

0 lc Marking smeared 

• Id Label torn 

d i e No label 

O l f COC not received 

• lg Other: 

1. Do sample container labels match COC? 

(IDs, Dates, Times) J 

— I 

• la Do not match COC 

D 1 b Incomplete information 

0 lc Marking smeared 

• Id Label torn 

d i e No label 

O l f COC not received 

• lg Other: 

1. Do sample container labels match COC? 

(IDs, Dates, Times) J 

— I 

• la Do not match COC 

D 1 b Incomplete information 

0 lc Marking smeared 

• Id Label torn 

d i e No label 

O l f COC not received 

• lg Other: 

1. Do sample container labels match COC? 

(IDs, Dates, Times) J 

— I 

• la Do not match COC 

D 1 b Incomplete information 

0 lc Marking smeared 

• Id Label torn 

d i e No label 

O l f COC not received 

• lg Other: 

1. Do sample container labels match COC? 

(IDs, Dates, Times) J 

— I 

• la Do not match COC 

D 1 b Incomplete information 

0 lc Marking smeared 

• Id Label torn 

d i e No label 

O l f COC not received 

• lg Other: 

2. Is the cooler temperature within limits? (> freezing 

temp, of water to 6"C;NC, 1668, 1613B: 0-4"C; 

VOST: 10°C;MA:2-6"C) 

J 

j 

2. Is the cooler temperature within limits? (> freezing • 2a Temp Blank = 

temp, of water to 6"C;NC, 1668, 1613B: 0-4"C; 

VOST: 10°C;MA:2-6"C) 

J 

j 

D 2b Cooler Temp = 

2. Is the cooler temperature within limits? (> freezing 

temp, of water to 6"C;NC, 1668, 1613B: 0-4"C; 

VOST: 10°C;MA:2-6"C) 

J 

j 

3. Were samples received with correct chemical 

preservative (excluding Encore)? I— 

J 3. Were samples received with correct chemical 0 3a Sample preservative = 

preservative (excluding Encore)? I— 

J 0 3a Sample preservative = 

4. Were custody seals present/intact on cooler and/or 

containers? 

j 

0 

d 4a Not present 

0 4b Not intact 

0 4c Other: 

4. Were custody seals present/intact on cooler and/or 

containers? 

j 

0 

d 4a Not present 

0 4b Not intact 

0 4c Other: 

-

4. Were custody seals present/intact on cooler and/or 

containers? 

j 

0 

d 4a Not present 

0 4b Not intact 

0 4c Other: 

5. Were all ofthe samples listed on the COC received? 1 0 5a Samples received-not on COC 

• 5b Samples not received-on COC 

5. Were all ofthe samples listed on the COC received? 1 0 5a Samples received-not on COC 

• 5b Samples not received-on COC 

6. Were all of the sample containers received intact? J ( • 6a Leaking 

• 6b Broken 

6. Were all of the sample containers received intact? J ( • 6a Leaking 

• 6b Broken 

7. Were VOA samples received without headspace? 4- J • 7a Headspace (VOA only) 

8. Were samples received in appropriate containers? •J I • 8a Improper container 

9. Did you check for residual chlorine, if necessary? 

i j • 9a Could not be determined due 

to matrix interference 

9. Did you check for residual chlorine, if necessary? 

i j • 9a Could not be determined due 

to matrix interference 

10. Were samples received within holding time? / • 10a Holding time expired 

U . For rad samples, was sample activity info, provided? 0 Incomplete information 

12. For 1613B water samples is pH<9? 

i J If no, was pH adjusted to pH 7 - 9 

with sulfuric acid? 

12. For 1613B water samples is pH<9? 

i J If no, was pH adjusted to pH 7 - 9 

with sulfuric acid? 

13. Are the shipping containers intact? T 

- i -

• 13a Leaking 

• 13b Other: 

13. Are the shipping containers intact? T 

- i -

• 13a Leaking 

• 13b Other: 

13. Are the shipping containers intact? T 

- i -

• 13a Leaking 

• 13b Other: 

14. Was COC relinquished? (Signed/Dated/Timed) 

•v 

Q 14a Not relinquished 

15. Are tests/parameters listed for each sample? H • 15a Incomplete information 

16. Is the matrix ofthe samples noted? i 0 15n Incomplete information 

17. Is the date/time of sample collection noted? •/ 0 15a Incomplete information 

18. Is the client and project name/# identified? u • 15a Incomplete information 

19. Was the sampler identified on the COC? J 

Ouote#: fif''31 , PM Instructions: 

^V—f^4— JX- , . ,-„ 

Date: QA026R21.doc, 090409 

•J>. 

VES019212 
65 

Wet Chemistry 

VES019213 
66 

Sample Summary 

VES019214 
67 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: HBTU-U4-M23A-R1 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-001 Work Order #...: LRE33 Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled. . .: 12/16/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS 

Ash. Content 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

Tota l Chlorine 

6700 200 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

8580 1800 BTU/lb 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

6440 244 nig/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.22 

_ METHOD 

ASTM D482-0Oa 

MDL : 51 

ASTM D240-02 

MDL : 13 0 

KNOX WC-0016 

MDL : 73 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

01/12/10 0012048 

01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

VES019215 
68 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: HBTtI-U4-M23A-R2 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-002 Work Order #... 

Date Sampled : 12/17/09 Date Received.. 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS 

Ash Content 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

Tota l Chlorine 

3730 200 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

8590 1800 BTU/lb 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

2540 258 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.2S 

LRE34 

12/19/09 

Matrix : WASTE 

_ METHOD 

ASTM D482-O0a 

MDL : 51 

ASTM D240-02 

MDIJ : 130 

KNOX WC-0016 

MDL : 77 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

01/12/10 0012048 

01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

VES019216 
69 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: HBTU-U4-M23A-R3 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404-003 Work Order #... : LRE35 Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled. ..: 12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 3080 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 8510 1800 BTU/11) ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

VaLue 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Total Chlorin e 2340 318 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.53 MDL : 95 

VES019217 
70 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: LBTU-U4-M23A-R1 

General ChemistryLot-Sample #...: H9L210404-004 Work Order #...: LRE36 Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled...: 12/16/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH ft 

Ash Content 2560 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor ; 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 226 B 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Valae 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL -. 130 

Tota l Chlorine 1280 214 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.07 MDL : S4 

NOTE (S) : , 

RL Repelling Limit 

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019218 
71 

AECOM, mc 

Clien t Sample ID: LBTU-U4-M23A-R2 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... 

Date Sampled... 

PARAMETER 

Ash Content 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

Tota l Chlorine 

: H9L210404-005 

: 12/17/09 

Work Order #.. 

Date Received. 

RESULT RL UNITS 

2730 200 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

154 B 1800 BTU/lb 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

1370 21G mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.0B 

. : LRE37 Matrix : WASTE 

: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

ASTM D482-O0a 01/11-01/13/lO 0011208 

MDL : 51 

ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

MDL : 13 0 

KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

MDL : 65 

NOTB(S) : 

RL Reporting Limit 

B Est'unsied result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019219 
72 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: LBTU-U4-M23A-R3 

General ChemistryLot -Sample #. . .: H9L210404-006 Work Order #...: LRE38 Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled...: 12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH S 

Ash Content 3350 200 mg/kg fiSTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : SI 

Gross Calorifi c 246 B 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Value . 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Total Chlorine 1670 216 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.08 MDL : 65 

NOTE (S) : 

RL Reporting Limit 

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019220 
73 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: SF-U4-M23A-R1 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample # : H9L210404-007 Work Order ft...: LRE4C Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled. ..: 12/16/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 1600 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011203 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 9390 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 13 0 

Tota l Chlorine 1240 252 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.26 MDL : 76 

VES019221 
74 

' AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: SF-TT4-M23A-R2 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-008 Work Order : LRE4D Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled. ..: 12/17/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH ft 

Ash Content 2890 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : S i 

Gross Calorifi c 9910 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Total Chlorin e 2220 266 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 Ol/ll-Ol/15/lO 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.33 MDL i 80 

VES019222 
75 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: SF-U4-M23A-R3 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404-009 Work Order #...: LRE4F Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled...: 12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 1920 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 001120B 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 9770 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

TotaL Chlorin e 1440 258 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.29 MDL : 77 

VES019223 
76 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: CS-U4-M23A-R1 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-010 Work Order #... : LRE4G Matrix : SOLID 

Date Sampled...: 12/16/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 699000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : l MDL : s i 

Gross Calorifi c ND 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL . : 130 • 

Tota l Chlorine 224 204 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.02 MDL. : 61 

VES019224 
77 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: CS-U4-M23A-R2 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-Oil Work Order #... : LRE4H Matrix : SOLID 

Date Sampled. .. : 12/17/09 Date Received. . : 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL; UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH g 

Ash Content 746000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-O0a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c ND 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Total Chlorine ND 208 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor ; 1.04 MDL : 62 

VES019225 
78 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: CS-U4-M23A-R3 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404-012 Work Order #... : LRE4J Matrix : SOLID 

Date Sampled...: 12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT Rio UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATS BATCH # 

Ash Content 737000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c ND 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 13 0 

Tota l Chlorin e 146 B 200 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 60 

NOTECS) : 

RL Repotting Limit 

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019226 
79 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: BS-U4-M23A-R1 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #-- -: H9L210404-013 . Work Order #... 

Date Sampled-..: 12/16/09 Date Received.. 

PARAMETER 

Ash Content 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

Total Chlorine 

RESULT RL UNITS 

725000 200 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

215 B 1800 BTU/lb 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

650 208 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.04 

LRE4K 

12/19/09 

Matrix. SOLID 

_ METHOD 

ASTM D482-O0a 

MDL : 51 

ASTM D5865-00 

MDL : 130 

KNOX WC-0016 

MDL : 62 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

01/13/10 0013028 

01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

NOTE(S) : 

RL Reporting Limit 

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019227 
80 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: BS-U4-M23A-R2 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-014 Work Order : LRE4L Matrix : SOLID 

Date Sampled...: 12/17/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 776000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 198 B 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

VaLne 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Tota l Chlorin e 517 200 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 60 

NOTB(S) : 

RL Rearing Limit 

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019228 
81 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: BS-U4-M23A-R3 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404-015 Work Order #...: LRE4M Matrix : SOLID 

Date Sampled. ..: 12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 794000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c ND 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Total Chlorin e 229 202 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.01 • MDL : 61 

VES019229 
82 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: HBTU-U4-M26A-R1 

General Chemistry 

L ot - Sample #-..: H9L210404-016 Work Order #... : LRE4N Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled. ..: 12/16/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS . METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 13200 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 9000 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Tota l Chlorin e 12500 1190 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 5.94 MDL : 360 

VES019230 
83 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: HBTU-U4-M26A-R2 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-017 Work Order #... : LRE4P Matrix ...: WASTE 

Date Sampled...: 12/17/09 Date Received..: .12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 3170 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-O0a Ol/ll-Ol/13/l O 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 HDL : SI 

Gross Calorifi c 8640 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL..., : 130 

Total Chlorin e 2470 270 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.35 MDL : 81 

VES019231 
84 

Lot-Sample #.. 

Date Sampled.. 

PARAMETER 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ZD: HBTU-U4-M26A-R3 

General Chemistry 

H9L210404-018 Work Order #... 

12/18/09 Date Received.. 

RESULT RL UNITS 

Ash Content 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

Tota l Chlorin e 

3290 200 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

8660 1800 BTU/lb 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

2310 240 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.2 

LRE4Q 

12/19/09 

Matrix : WASTE 

_ METHOD 

ASTM D482-00a 

MDL : 51 

ASTM D240-02 

MDL : 13 0 

KNOX WC-0016 

MDL : 72 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

01/12/10 0012048 

01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

VES019232 
85 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: LBTU-U4-M2 6A-R1 

General Cheinistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-019 Work Order #...: LRE4R 

Date Sampled : 12/16/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

Matrix -. WASTE 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS 

Ash. Content 

Gross Calorifi c 

Valae 

Tota l Chlorine 

2660 200 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 , 

258 B 1800 BT0/lb 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

1250 212 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.06 

_ METHOD 

ASTM D482-O0a 

MDL : 51 

ASTM D240-02 

MDL : 130 

KNOX WC-0016 

MDL : 64 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

01/12/10 0012048 

01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

NOTE(S): 

RL Reporting Limit 

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019233 
86 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: LBTO-U4-M26A-R2 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404-020 Work Order #... : LRE4T Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled...: 12/17/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 2770 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 251 B 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Tota l Chlorine 1310 210 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.05 MDL : 63 

NOTE(S) : 

RL Reporting Limit 

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. 

i 

I 

VES019234 
87 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: L_rU-U4-M26A-R3 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-021 Work Order #...: LRE4V Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled : 12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 4150 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-O0a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 189 B 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Total Chlorin e 1S20 208 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.04 MDL : 62 

NOTE(S) : 

RL Reporting Limit 

B Estimaied result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019235 
88 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: SF-U4-M26A-R1 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-022 Work Order #... LRE4W Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled. 

PARAMETER 

12/15/09 

RESULT 

Date Received..: 12/19/09 

RL UNITS 

Ash Content 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

Tota l Chlorin e 

1480 200 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

10100 1800 BTU/lb 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

1120 2S0 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.3 

METHOD 

ASTM D482-00a 

. MDL : 51 

ASTM D240-02 

MDL : 130 

KNOX WC-0016 

MDL : 78 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

01/12/10 0012048 

01/11-01/19/10 0011044 

VES019236 
89 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: SF-U4-M26A-R2 

General Chemistry 

lot-Sample #... : H9L210404-023 Work Order : LRE4X Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled...: 12/17/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 4570 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-O0a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 9430 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Tota l Chlorin e 3610 252 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/19/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.26 MDL : 76 

VES019237 
90 

Lot-Sample #.. 

Date Sampled. . 

PARAMETER 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: SF-D4-M26A-R3 

General Chemistry 

H9L210404-024 Work Order #...: LRE40 Matrix : WASTE 

12/18/09 

RESULT 

Date Received. 

RL UNITS 

Ash Content 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

Tota l Chlorine 

1820 200 mg/kg 

Dilutio n Factor ; 1 

9820 1800 BTU/lb 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

1400 252 rag/kg 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.26 

12/19/09 

METHOD 

ASTM D482-00a 

MDL : 51 

ASTM D240-02 

MDL : 130 

KNOX WC-0016 

MDL : 76 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

01/12/10 0012048 

01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

VES019238 
91 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: CS-U4-M26A-R1 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-025 Work Order #...: LRE43 

Date Sampled. .. : 12/16/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PARAMETER 

Ash Content 

Matrxx. SOLID 

RESULT RL UNITS METHOD 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

785000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL -.51 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

ND 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Tota l Chlorine ND 208 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.04 MDL : 62 

VES019239 
92 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: CS-04-M26A-R2 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404-026 Work Order : LRE44 Matrix : SOLID 

Date SSampled. . .: 12/17/09 Date Received...- 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 857000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c ND 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Total Chlorin e ND 212 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.05 MDL : 64 

VES019240 
93 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: CS-tT4-M26A-R3 

General Chemistry 

L ot - Sample #...: H9L210404-027 Work Order : LRE45 Matrix : SOLID 

Date Sampled : 12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH ff 

Ash Content 744000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/0S-01/07/1O 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c ND 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Valae 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Tota l Chlorin e ND 208 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.04 MDL : 62 

VES019241 
94 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample XD: BS-U4-M26A-R1 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404-028 Work Order #... : LRE46 Matrix : SOLID 

Date Sampled...: 12/16/09 Date Received.. : 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH j? 

A sh Content 808000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 200 B 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Tota l Chlorin e 433 202 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.01 MDL : 61 

NOTE(S) : 

RL Reporting Limit 

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019242 
95 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: BS-U4-M26A-R2 

Genexal Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404-029 Work Order #...: LRE47 Matrix : SOLID 

Date Sampled...: 12/17/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 801000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c 196 B 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

"Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Total Chlorine 976 216 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.08 MDL : 55 

KOTB(S) : 

RL Repining Limit 

B Estimated result. Result is less linn RL. 

VES019243 
96 

AECOM, Inc 

Clien t Sample ID: BS-U4-M26A-R3 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404-030 Work Order #...-. LRE48 Matrix : SOLID 

Date Sampled : 12/18/09 Date Received..; 12/19/09 

PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT RL UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content 797000 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 51 

Gross Calorifi c ND 1800 BTU/lb ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Value 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : 130 

Tota l Chlorine 610 200 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 MDL : SO 

VES019244 
97 

QC Summary 

VES019245 
98 

METHOD BLANK EEPORT 

General Chemistry 

Clien t Lot #...: H9L210404 Matrix : SOLID 

REPORTING PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content Work Order #: LRVT31AA MB Lot-Sample #: HOA050000-274 

ND 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

Total Chlorine Work Order LRW7S1AA MB Lot-Sample #: HOA070000-036 

ND 200 mg/kg KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

NOTE |S) : 

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019246 
99 

METHOD BLANK EEPORT 

General Chemistry 

Clien t Lo t #. . . : H9L210404 Matrix : WASTE 

REPORTING PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content Work Order #: LR2KQ1AA MB Lot-Sample #: HQA110000-208 

ND 200 mg/kg ASTM D482-00a Ol/U-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

Total Chlorin e Work Order #: LR2CJ1AA MB Lot-Sample #: HQA110000-044 

ND 200 mg/kg KNOX WC-0015 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

NOTB( S) : 

Calculaiions are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019247 
100 

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sairrple #. . H9L210404 Matrix. 

PARAMETER 

Ash Content 

PERCENT 

RECOVERY 

101 

101 

RECOVERY 

LIMITS RPD 

RPD 

LIMITS METHOD 

PREPARATIONANALYSIS DATE 

: SOLID 

PREP 

BATCH # 

WO#:LRVT31AC-LCS/LRVT31AD-LCSD LCS Lot-Sample#: H0A050OO0-274 

(90 - 110) ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

(90 - 110) 0.12 (0-10) ASTM D482-O0a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

100 

100 

W0#:LR4DC1AA-LCS/LR4DC1AC-LCSD LCS Lot-Sample#: H0A130OO0-028 

(98 - 102) ASTM D58S5-00 

(98 - 102) 0.06 (0-2.0) ASTM D5865-00 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

01/13/10 

01/13/10 

0013028 

0013028 

NOTE(S): 

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019248 
101 

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DATA REPORT 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404 Matrix : SOLID 

SPIKE MEASURED PERCNT PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER AMOUNT AMOUNT UNITS RECVRY RPD METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content WO#:LRVT31AC-LCS/LRVT31AD-LCSD LCS Lot-SampleS: H0A05OO00-274 

4000 4050 mg/kg 101 ASTM D482-O0a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

4000 4060 mg/kg 101 0.12 ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

Gross Calorifi c WO#:LR4DC1AA-LCS/LR4DC1AC-LCSD LCS Lot-Sample#: HOA130000-028 

Value 

11400 11400 BTU/lb 100 ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

11400 11400 BTU/lb 100 0.06 ASTM D5865-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

NOTECS) : ' 

Calculaiions are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019249 
102 

LaBORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT 

General C_emistry 

Clien t Lot # : H9L210404 Matrix. . : SOLID 

PERCENT RECOVERY PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RECOVERY LIMITS METHOD __ _ ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Total Chlorin e Work Order #: LRW761AC LCS Lot-SampleS: HOA070000-036 

101 (80 - 120) KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 5 

NOTE(S) : 

Cslculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019250 
103 

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DATA REPORT 

General Chemistry 

Clien t Lot #...: H9L210404 Matrix : SOLID 

SPIKE MEASURED PERCNT PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER AMOUNT AMOUNT UNITS RECVRY METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Total Chlorine Work Order #: LRW761AC LCS Lot-Sample*: HOA070000-036 

10000 10100 mg/kg 101 KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 5 

NOTE(S) : 

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019251 
104 

LABORATORY COHTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT 

General Cnemistry 

Lot-Sample #...: H9L210404 Matrxx. 

PARAMETER 

Ash Content 

PERCENT 

RECOVERY 

98 

101 

RECOVERY 

LIMITS RPD 

RPD 

LIMITS METHOD 

PREPARATIONANALYSIS DATE 

: WASTE 

PREP 

BATCH # 

W0#:LR2KQ1AC-LCS/LR2KQ1AD-LCSD LCS Lot-Sample?*: H0A110OO0-2O6 

(90 - 110) ASTM D482-00a 0l/ll-0l/l3/l 0 0011208 

(90 - 110) 2.4 (0-10) ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

Gross Calorifi c 

Value 

ioo 

100 

WO#:LR2981AA-LCS/LR2981AC-LCSD LCS Lot-Samples: H0A120O00-048 

(98 - 102) 

(98 - 102) 0.02 (0-2.0) 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

ASTM D24O-02 

ASTM D240-02 

01/12/10 

01/12/10 

0012048 

0012048 

NOTE(S) 

Calculations are performed before roundins to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019252 
105 

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DATA REPORT 

General Chemistry 

Lot-Sample #... : H9L210404 Matrix : WASTE 

SPIKE MEASURED PERCNT PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER AMOUNT AMOUNT UNITS RECVRY RPD METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Ash Content W0#:LR2KQ1AC-LCS/LR2KQ1AD-LCSD LCS Lot-Sample#: HOA110000-208 

40O0 3930 mg/kg 98 ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

4000 4030 mg/kg 101 2.4 ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

Gross Calorifi c WO#:LR2981AA-LCS/LR2981AC-LCSD LCS Lot-Sample#: HOA120000-048 

Valae 

20600 20500 BTU/lb 100 ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

20600 20500 BTU/lb 100 0.02 ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

NOTE(S) : 

Calculaiions are performed before rounding io avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019253 
106 

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT 

General Chemistry 

Clien t Lot #-..: H9L210404 Matrix t WASTE 

PERCENT RECOVERY PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER RECOVERY LIMITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Tota l Chlorine Work Order #: LR2CJ1AC LCS Lot-Sample*: HOA110000-044 

104 (80 - 120) KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : S 

NOTE(S) : . 

Caloularions are perfomied before rounding lo avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019254 
107 

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DATA REPORT 

General Chemistry 

Clien t Lo t #...: H9L210404 Matrix : WASTE 

SPIKE MEASURED PERCNT PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER AMOUNT AMOUNT UNITS RECVRY METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Tota l Chlorine Work Order #: LR2CJ1AC LCS Lot-Sample#: HOA110000-044 

10000 10400 mg/kg 104 KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 5 

NOTE(S) : — 

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019255 
108 

MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT 

Clien t Lo t #. . . 

Date Sampled.. 

: H9L210404 

: 12/18/09 

General Chemistry 

Date Received..: 12/19/09 

PARAMETER 

Tota l Chlorin e 

107 

106 

PERCENT RECOVERY 

RECOVERY LIMITS RPD 

RPD 

LIMITS METHOD 

Matrix : WASTE 

PREPARATIONANALYSIS DATE 

PREP 

BATCH # 

WO#: LRE351AG-MS/LRE351AH-MSD MS Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-003 

(80 - 120) KNOX'WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

(80 - 120) 2.5 (0-10) KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 8.3 

NOTE (S) : 

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019256 
109 

MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE DATA REPORT 

General Chemistry 

Clien t Lot #...: H9L210404 Matrix : WASTE 

Date Sampled. ..: 12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

SAMPLE SPIKE MEASRD PERCNT PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAMETER AMOUNT AMT AMOUNT UNITS RECVRY RPD METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Total Chlorine W0#: LRE351AG-MS/LRE351AH-MSD MS Lot-Sample #: H9L21O404-O03 

2340 15600 20100 mg/kg 107 KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

2340 16200 19600 mg/kg 106 2.5 KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Facto r -.8.3 « 

NOTE IS) : 

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

I 

VES019257 
110 

MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE EVALUATION EEPORT 

General Chemistry 

Clien t Lo t #... 

Date Sampled... 

: H9L210404 

: 12/18/09 Date Received.. 2.2/19/09 

PARAMETER 

Total Chlorin e 

97 

100 

PERCENT RECOVERY 

RECOVERY LIMITS RPD 

RPD 

LIMITS METHOD 

Matrix : SOLID 

PREPARATIONANALYSIS DATE 

PREP 

BATCH # 

W0#: LRE4J1AG-MS/LRE4J1AH-MSD MS Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-012 

(80 - 120) KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

(80 - 120) 3.4 (0-10) KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 4 . 9S 

NOTE(S) : 

Calculaiions are performed before rounding lo avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

VES019258 
111 

MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE DATA REPORT 

General _emistr y 

Clien t Lot #.. , 

Date Sampled. . 

H9L210404 

12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

Matrix. SOLID 

SAMPLE SPIKE 

PARAMETER AMODNT AMT 

Tota l Chlorin e 

146 9920 

146 10000 

MEASRD 

AMOUNT UNITS 

PERCNT 

RECVRY RPD METHOD 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH 

WO#: LRE4J1AG-MS/LRE4J1AH-MSD MS Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-012 

9820 mg/kg 97 KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

10200 mg/kg 100 3.4 KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.96 

NOTE (S): 

Calculations are performed before roundins to avoid round-off errors in calculaied results. 

VES019259 
112 

SAMPLE DUPLICATE EVALUATION REPORT 

General <_ien_stry 

Clien t Lo t #...: H9L210404 Work Order #....- LRE35-SMP Matrix : WASTE 

LRE35-DUP 

Date Sampled...: 12/18/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

DUPLICATE RPD PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAM RESULT RESULT UNITS RPD LIMIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Gross Calorifi c SD Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-003 

Value 

8510 8S20 BTU/lb 1.3 (0-10) ASTM D240-02 01/12/10 0012048 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

.Ash Content SD Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-003 

3080 3050 mg/kg 1.1 (0-10) ASTM D482-00a 01/11-01/13/10 0011208 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

Total Chlorin e SD Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-003 

2340 2350 mg/kg 0.13 (0-10) KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.S9 

VES019260 
113 

SAMPLE DUPLICATE EVALUATION REPORT 

General Chemistry 

Clien t Lot #..-: H9L210404 Work Order #. . . : LRE4J-SMP Matrix : SOLID 

LRE4J-DUP 

Date Sampled...: 12/18/09 Date Received. . : 12/19/09 

DUPLICATE RPD PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAM RESULT RESULT UNITS RPD LIMIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Gross Calorifi c SD Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-012 

Value 

ND ND BTU/lb 0 (0-10) ASTM D58S5-00 01/13/10 0013028 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

Ash Content SD Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-012 

737000 741000 mg/kg 0.56 (0-10) ASTM D482-00a 01/05-01/07/10 0005274 

Dilutio n Factor-. 1 

Tota l Chlorin e SD Lot-Sample #:• H9L210404-012 

146 B 149 B mg/kg 1.9 (0-10) KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

NOTE (S) : ; ' 

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. 

B Estimated result. Result is less than RL. 

VES019261 
114 

SAMPLE DDPLICATE EVALUATION REPORT 

General Cherrristry 

Clien t Lot #...: H9L210404 Work Order #. . . : LRE4P-SMP Matrix : WASTE 

LRE4P-DUP 

Date Sampled : 12/17/09 Date Received..: 12/19/09 

DUPLICATE RPD PREPARATION- PREP 

PARAM RESULT RESULT UNITS RPD LIMIT METHOD ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

Tota l Chlorin e SD Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-017 

2470 2530 mg/kg 2.5 (0-10) KNOX WC-0016 01/11-01/15/10 0011044 

Dilutio n Factor : 1.35 

VES019262 
117 

Clien t Lot #...: H9L210404 

Date Sampled. 12/18/09 

SAMPLE DDPLICATE EVALUATION REPORT 

General C_emistry 

Work Order #...: LRE48-SMP 

LRE48-DUP . 

Date Received..: 12/19/09 

Matrix. SOLID 

PARAM RESULT 

Total Chlorine 

SIO 

DUPLICATE 

RESULT UNITS 

RPD 

RPD LIMIT METHOD. 

245 mg/kg 85 

Dilutio n Factor : 1 

PREPARATION- PREP 

ANALYSIS DATE BATCH # 

SD Lot-Sample #: H9L210404-030 

(0-10) KNOX WC-0016 01/07-01/14/10 0007036 
VES019264 
VES019265.pdf 
T RI Form R | Envirofacts | US EP A Page 1 of 6 

vvEFV\ 

Envirofacts 

For m R 

IJWWdSUt.i 

Arjency 

FORM R REPORTS 

As a result of Ihe TRI Reporting Forms Modification Rule, beginning in reporting year 2005, the Toxics Release Inventory Prooram is 

no longer collecting latitude and longitude data or EPA program ID data (Including Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 

IDs, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) IDs AND Underground Injection Code (UIC) IDs) via Ihe FORM R or 

FORM A Certification Stalement. However, this data will still be made available lo TRI dala users and will be included in TRI data 

Reports. For those Reports, this data will be obtained from the Facility Registry Svstem (FRSl, Latitude and longitude coordinates 

used to represent TRI faciliiies are chosen from the FRS using the "Pick Best" Process. Primary permitting systems supply FRS with 

the prooram IDs that are used to represent TRI facilities. The FRS dala that are being used to represent this facility are: 

Reference Polnt/DescriDtion Latitude Longitude Collection Method Accuracy Value 

N/A 36.59452 -90.18551 N/A N/A 

IRCRA ID NUMBER! 

ILD098642424 

INPDES PERMIT NUMBER! 

UIC ID NUMBER 

NO DATA 

Overview 

TRI Tools 

• TRI Explorer 

• TRI Search 

• Form R Search 

• Form R & A Download 

• EZ Search 

• Customized Search 

• Pollution Prevention 

• Data Element Saaroh Tool 

TRI Guides 

• TRI Explorer Guide 

• TRI Search Guide 

' Form R & A Download Guide 

• EZ Search Guide 

• Customized Search Guide 

• Pollution Prevention Guide 

• Qperatpr Definition 

• Model 

' Contact Us 

1

 TRI Program Home 

' RSEI Prooram Home 

To correct Ihe FRS latitude, longllude or program ID values click on Ihe "Report an Error" button in Ihe lop right corner of this page. Facilities wishing to correct olher d 

elements with the FORM R or FORM A should refer lo How to Revise TRI Data. 

For more information, see Colleclion of Latitude. Longitude and Program ID Data Has Been Discontinued. 

PART I. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION (FORM R) 

DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER: 1313211627258 

FTlFacililv Registry Svstem ID: 110000438893 

Section 1. Reporting Year 

Reporting Year: 2013 

Section 2. Trade Secret Information 

2.1 Trade Secret: NO 

2.2 Sanitized Copy: Unsanltized 

Section 3. Certification 

CERTIFYING OFFICIAL'S NAME CERTIFYING OFFICIAL'S TITLE1 CERTIFYING OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED 

DOUG HARRIS GENERAL MANAGER Electronic 30-JUN-14 

Section 4. Facility Identification 

TRI Facility ID: 62201TRDWS7MOBI 

4.1 Facility Name and Address. 

Facility Information 

http ://oaspub. epa. gov/enviro/tri_forrnrj3artone_v2.get_thisone?rpt_y ear=2013 &dcn_nu... 12/15/2014 

VES019265 
T RI Form R | Envirofacts | US EP A Page 2 of 6 

NAME STREET CITY COUNTY STATE ZIP CODE 

VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 7 MOBILE AVE SAUGET ST CLAIR IL 622011069 

BIA Tribal Code Tribe 

NO DATA NO DATA 

Mailing Information 

NAME STREET CITY STATE ilPCODE 

VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 7 MOBILE AVE SAUGET IL 62201-1069 

PROVINCE COUNTRY (NON - US1 

NO DATA NO DATA 

4.2 Facility Classification 

ENTIRE FACILITY! PARTIAL FACILITY FEDERAL FACILITY1 GOCO FACILITY 

YES NO NO NO 

4.3 Technical Contact 

Not Available to the Public as Ihis Information Is only for Intranet. 

4.4 Public Contact 

NAME PHONE 

DENNIS WARCHOL 6182712804 

4.5 NAICS Codes 

NAICS CODE PRIMARYlNAICS CODE DESCRIPTION 

562211 YES Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal 

4.7 Dun Numbers 

|OUNS NUMBER| 

5, Parent Company Information 

Parent Company Name: VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 

Parent Company DUNS Number: 145968124 

PART II. CHEMICAL - SPECIFIC INFORMATION 

DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER: 1313211627258 

Section 1. Toxic Chemical Identity 

1.1 CAS Number: N458 

1.2 Toxic Chemical or Chemical Category Name: MERCURY COMPOUNDS 

1.3 Generic Chemical Name: NA 

1.4 Distribution of Each Member of Ihe Dioxin and Dioxin like Compounds Category 

NA. 1 2 I i fi v& a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 

NO 

t 

i 

17j 

I 

Section 2. Mixture Component Identity 

http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/tri_forr^ 12/15/2014 

VES019266 
T RI Form RI Envirofacts I U S EP A Page 3 of 6 

2.1 Supplier Provided Generic Chemical Name: NA 

Section 3. Activities and Uses of the Toxic Chemical 

3.1 Manufacture the Toxic Chemical: 

Produce: YES Import: NO On-Slle Use/Processina: NO 

Sale/Distribution: NO BvDroducI: NO ImDurltv: YES 

3.2 Process the Toxic Chemical: 

Reactant: NO Formulation Component: NO Article Component; NO Reoackaaina; NO ImDuritv; NO 

3.3 Otherwise Use the Toxic Chemical: 

Chemical Processing Aid: NO Manufacturfna Aid: NO Ancillary or Olher Use: YES 

Section 4. Maximum Amount of the Toxic Chemical Onsite During the Calendar Year 

Maximum Chemical Amount: 0 to 99 

Section 6. Quantity of the Toxic Chemical Entering each Environmental Medium Onsite 

5.1 Fugitive or Non-Point Air Emissions 

NA TOTAL RELEASE (Dervearl UNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

NO 0 Pounds 0 - Olher Approaches 

6.2 Stack or Point Air Emissions 

NA TOTAL RELEASE (per vearl UNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

NO 3.1 Pounds M2 - Monitoring. Periodic/Random 

6.3 Discharoes to Receiving Streams or Water Bodies 

NA STREAM/WATER BODY NAME TOTAL RELEASE (Dervearl UNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE f* FROM STORMWATER 

YES NA 

6.4,1 Underground Injection Onsite to Class I Wells, 

NA TOTAL RELEASE (oer year) UNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

YES 

6.4.2 Underground Injection Onsite to Class ll-V Wells. 

NA TOTAL RELEASE (per vear) UNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

YES 

5.5 Disposal to Land Onsite 

6.5.1A RCRA Subtitle C Landfills 

NA TOTAL RELEASE (per vearUNI ) T OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

YES 

5.5.1B Other Landfills 

http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/tri_formr^_partone_v2.get_thisone?rpt_jear=2013&dcn_nu.., 12/15/2014 

VES019267 
T RI Form R | Envirofacts | US EP A 

N& TOTAL RELEASE (per vear) UNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

YES 

5.5.2 Land Treatment/ARplicatjort Farming 

NA TOTAL RELEASE (Der vear) UNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

YES 

5.5.3A RCRA Subtitle C Surface Impoundments 

NA. TOTAL RELEASE (Der veart UNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

YES 

5.5.3B Other Surface Impoundments 

NA TOTAL RELEASE (per vearUNI ) T OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

YES 

5.6,4 Other Disposal 

NA [TOTAL RELEASE (per vear) LJNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

NO 0 Pounds 0 - Other Approaches 

Section 6. Transfers of the Toxic Chemical in Wastes to Off-Site Locations 

6.1 Discharges to Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) 

1 - NAME: ADDRESS: 

CITY: STATE: 

COUNTY: ZIP CODE: 

TOTAL TRANSFERS (per vear) UNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE 

NO DATA NO DATA 

6.2 Transfers to other Off-Site Locations 

1 RCRA Number: ILD984S93461 Parent ComDanv Controlled: NO 

Name: MILAM RECYCLING & DISPOSAL Address: I55 AND ILLINOIS 203 N 

Citv: EAST ST LOUIS Stale: IL 

County: ST CLAIR ZiD Code: 62201 

Country Code (Non - US): Province: 

OFFSITE AMOUNT SEQUENCE TOTAL TRANSFERS (Der vearllUNIT OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE WASTE MANAGEMENT TYPE 

1 .1 Pounds 0 - Other Approaches M64-Olher Landfills 

2 RCRA Number: MID000724831 Parent Company Controlled: NO 

Name: MICHIGAN DISPOSAL Address: 49350194 SERVICE DR. 

http ://oaspub. epa. gov/enviro/tri_formr_partone_v2. get_thisone?rpt_y ear=2013 &dcn_nu... 12/15/2014 

VES019268 

Page 4 of 6 
T RI Form R I Envirofacts I U S EP A Page 5 of 6 

Cilv: BELLEVILLE State: Ml 

Countv: WAYNE ZiD Code: 48111 

Country Code (Non - US): Province: 

OFFSITE AMOUNT 

SEQUENCE 

[TOTA L TRANSFER S Iper 

'earl 

UNIT OF 

[MEASURE 

BASIS OF ESTIMATE WASTE MANAGEMENT TYPE 

0 - Other 

Approaches 

M41 - Solldification/Stabllizallon-Metals and Melal Compounds 

only 

3 RCRA Number: WID003967148 Parent Company Controlled: YES 

Name: VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC Address: W124N9451 BOUNDARY RD 

City: MENOMONEE FALLS Slate: WI 

Countv: WAUKESHA ZiD Code; 53051 

Countrv Code (Non - US): Province: 

OFFSIT E AMOUN T SEQUENC E TOTA L TRANSFER S (per vear) UNI T O F MEASUR E BASI S O F ESTIMAT E WASTE MANAGEMEN T TYP E 

1 1682 Pounds 0-Olher Approaches M94 - Transfer to Waste Broker-Disposal 

4 RCRA Number: MND00O8O8931 Parent Company Controlled: NO 

Name: CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER CORP Address: 711 30TH AVE NE 

Citv: MINNEAPOLIS Stale: MN 

Countv: HENNEPIN ZIo Code: 55418 

Countrv Code (Non - US): Province: 

OFFSITE AMOUNT SEQUENCE TOTAL TRANSFERS (per vearUNI ) T OF MEASURE BASIS OF ESTIMATE WASTE MANAGEMENT TYPE 

1 .1 Pounds 0 - Other Approaches M90 - Other Off-Site Management 

Section 7A. On-Slte Waste Treatment Methods and Efficiency 

7A.1 a. Waste Stream: SOLID WASTE STREAMS 

ff'A.lb. WAST E TREATMEN T METHOD(S ) SEQUENC E 

H040 - Incineration - thermal destruction olher than use as a fuel 

7A.1d. Waste Treatment Efficiency Estimate: Equal to or greater than 0% but less than or equal to 50% 

7A.2a. Waste Stream: LIQUID WASTE 

WASTE TREATMENT METHOD(S) SEQUENCE 

H040 - Incineration - thermal destruction olher than use as a fuel 

7A.2d. Waste Treatment Efficiency Estimate: Equal to or greater than 0% but less than or equal to 50% 

http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/tri_fo 12/15/2014 

VES019269 
T RI Form R | Envirofacts | U S EP A Page 6 of 6 

7A.3a. Waste Slream: WASTEWATER 

7A.3b.WASTE TREATMENT METHODIS) SEQUENCE 

1 H040 - Incineration - thermal destruction other than use as a fuel 

7A.3d. Waste Treatment Efficiency Estimate: Equal to or greater than 0% but less than or equal to 50% 

7A.4a. Waste Slream: GASEOUS 

7A.4b WASTE TREATMENT METHODIS) SEQUENCE 

1 H040 - Incineration - thermal destruction other lhan use as a fuel 

2 A03 - SCRUBBER 

7A.4d. Waste Treatment Efficiency Estimate: Equal to or greater than 0% but less than or equal to 50% 

Section 7B. On-Site Energy Recovery Processes 

ON SITE ENERGY RECOVERY PROCESSES 

NA 

Section 7C. On-Slte Recycling Processes 

ON SJTE RECYCLING PROCESSES 

NA 

Section 8. Source Reduction and Recycling Activities 

SECTION TYPE OF QUANTITY UNITS PRIOR CURRENT REPORTING FOLLOWING SECOND FOLLOWING 

YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR 

8.1a Total on-site disposal to Class I Underground Injection Wells, RCRA 

Subtitle C landfills, and other landfills 

NA NA NA NA 

8.1b Total other on-site disposal or other releases Pounds 3.38 3.1 3.1 3.1 

8.1c Total off-site disposal to Class I Underground Injection Wells, RCRA 

Subtitle C landfills, and other landfills 

Pounds 

Pounds 

0 

186.2 

.1 .1 .1 

8.1d Total other off-site disposal or other releases 

Pounds 

Pounds 

0 

186.2 1721.1 1721 1721 

8.2 Quantity Used for Energy Recovery Onsite NA NA NA NA 

8.3 Quantity Used for Energy Recovery Offsite NA NA NA NA 

8.4 Quantity Recycled Onsile NA NA NA NA 

8.5 Quanlity Recycled Offsite NA NA NA NA 

8.6 Quantity Treated Onsite NA NA NA NA 

8.7 Quanlity Treated Offsite j NA NA NA NA 

8,8 One-Time Event Release; NA 

fl.0 Production Ratio: 1.22 

8,10 Source Reduction Activities 

SOURCE REDUCTION ACTIVITIES METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 

NA 

8.11 Addiiionai Dala Indicator: NO 

http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/tri_formrjpartone_v2.get_thisone?ipt_year=2013&dcn_nu... 12/15/2014 

VES019270 
VES019271.pdf 
Joseph M. Kellmeyer 

P 314.552,6166 

F 314.552.7166 

jkellmeyer@thompsoncoburn.corn 

December 26,2013 

George T. Czerniak 

Director, Air and Radiation Division, Region 5 

United State Environmental Protection Agency 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Re: Request To Provide Information Pursuant to the Clean Air Ac t 

Dated December 10,2013 

Dear Mr. Czerniak: 

As you know, this firm represents Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. ("Veolia"). On or 

about December 12,2013, Veolia received the above-referenced Information Requests, a copy of 

which is enclosed as Ex. A . The Infonnation Requests seek information under Section 114(a) of 

the Clean Air Act and require Veolia to respond wtthin 14 days of receipt. Upon receiving the 

requests, Veolia worked diligently to compile and produce the requested data and formulate 

responses to the Agency's inquiries by the deadline. 

Veolia's narrative response and accompanying data are enclosed with this cover letter and are 

being produced subject to and under the following objections: 

1. Veolia objects to the Information Requests to the extent that any instruction or 

request is overly broad, vague or ambiguous, or otherwise not in accordance with 

applicable law. 

2. Veolia objects to the Information Requests to the extent any instruction or request 

is different in whole or in part from information Veolia's competitors are required 

to provide to the Agency. To the extent such differences exist, Veolia is placed at 

a disadvantage that violates its equal protection and due process rights. 

3. Veolia objects to the Information Requests to the extent any instruction or request 

arbitrarily and capriciously requests information which is irrelevant or 

information that has already been collected by the Agency albeit in a different 

fashion or using a different method. 

4. Veolia objects to the Information Requests and reserves its right to withhold 

information to the extent any request seeks information or materials protected by 

Thompson Cobum LLP | Attorneys at Law | One US Bank Plaza | St. Louis, Missouri 63101 

P 314.552.6000 | F 314.552.7000 | www.thompsoncoburn.com 

Chicago * St. Louis • Southern Illinois * Washington, D.C, 

THOMPSO N 

COBURN l l p 

VES019271 
December 26,2013 

Page 2 

the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine or any other applicable 

privileges. 

While Veolia submits its response subject to the foregoing general objections and qualifications, 

Veolia, nevertheless, has attempted to provide the requested information in good faith and has 

expended significant time and resources in doing so. 

Veolia reserves the right to provide additional information in the future and/or to further amend 

or supplement its response. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please 

contact the undersigned. 

Very truly yours, 

Thompson Cobum LL P 

JMK / 

Enclosures 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y 

REGION S 

IN TH E MATTE R OF: 

Veolia Environmental Services 

"WT Mobfle Aveuiie •'• * - — ,„,„„..,.,.„„,„,,, , „.,.„.,.,„„.,.,. 

Sauget, Illinois 62201 

ATTENTION : 

Doug Harris 

General Manager 

Reaoest to Provide Information Pursuant to the Clean Air Ac t 

The U.S, Envirorimental Protection Agency is requiring Veolia Environmental Services 

(Veolia or j'ou) to submit certain information about your facility at #7 Mobile Avenue, Sauget, 

Illinois. Appendix A provides the instructions needed to answer this information request, 

mclud^'mstractions for electronic submissions. Appendix B specifies the ir&nnation that you 

must submit You must send this information to us within 14 calendar days after you receive this 

request 

We are issumg this formatio n request under section 114(a) of the Clean Air Act (the 

Act), 42 U.S.C. § 7414(a). Section 114(a) authorizes the Adrninistrator of EPA to require the 

submission of information.- The Administcator has delegated this authority to the Director of the 

Air and Radiation Division, Region 5, 

Veolia owns and operates hazardous waste ineinerators at the Sauget, Blinois facility. 

We are requesting this information to determine whether your emission source is complying with 

the Hazardous Waste Combustor MACT . 

VES019273 
Veolia must send all required information to: 

Attn: Compliance Tracker, AE-17J 

A ir Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protection. Agency 

Region 5 

"^7'~^B£1^3^n'B6vSiCvwSL " v TM~~- v-••-•- ,"-'TM~•• ; 

Chicago, Hlinois 60604 

Veolia must submit all required infonnation under an authorized signature with the 

following certification: 

I certify under penalty of law that I have examined and am fanriliar with'the 

infonnation in the enclosed documents, mcluding all attachments. Based on my 

inquiry of those individuals with primary responsibility for obtaining the 

information, I certify that the statements and information are, to the best of my 

knowledge and behef, true and complete. I am aware that there are significant 

penalties for knowingly submitting false statements and information, mcluding 

the possibility of fines or imprisonment pursuant to Section 113(c)(2) ofthe Clean 

Air Act and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1341. 

As explained more fully in Appendix C, you may assert a claim of business 

rarifidentiality under 40 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart B for any part ofthe information you submit to 

us. Information subject to a business confidentiality claim is available to me public only to the 

extent, and by means of the procedures, set forth at 40 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart B. Jf you do not 

assert a business confidentiality claim when you submit the Mormation, EPA may make this 

information available to the public without further notice. You should be aware, moreover, that 

pursuant to Section 114(c) ofthe CA A and 40 C.F.R. § 2.301(a) and (f), emissions data, 

standards and limitations are not entitled to confidential treatment and shall be made available to 

the public notwiliistanding any assertion of a business confidentiality claim. Appendix C 

provides additional information regarding the meaning and scope of 1he term "emissions data," 

VES019274 
This information request is not subjectto the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

etseq., because it seeks collection of information from specific mdividuals or entities as part of 

an adnnnistrative action or investigation. 

We'mayuse'anym^^ 

civil or criminal action. 

Failure to comply fully with this information request may subject Veolia to an 

enforcement action under Section 113 ofthe CAA , 42 U.S.C. § 7413. 

Y o u should direct any questions about this information Request to Shannon Downey at 

(312) 353-2151 and downev.shannon@epa.gov or Eleanor Kane at (312) 353-4840 and 

kane.eleanor©,epa.gov. 

Date 

i • 

3 

VES019275 
Appendix A 

When providing the mformation requested in Appendix B, use the foUowing instructions and 

definitions. 

_ Instnictioris 

1. Provide a separate ri^rrative response to each question and subpart of a question set forth 

i n Appendix B. 

2. Precede each answer with fhe number of the question to which it corresponds and identify 

the person(s) who provided information used or considered in responding to that 

question, as well as each person consulted in the preparation of that response. 

3. Indicate on each document produced, or in some other reasonable manner, the number of 

the question to which it corresponds. 

4. .When a response is provided in the form of a number, specify the units of measure. 

5. Where information or documents necessary for a respOMe are neither in your possession 

nor available to you, indicate in your response why the irifoinration or documents are not 

available or in your possession, and identify any source that either possesses or is likely 

to possess the documents or information. 

6. If information not known or not available to you as of the date of submission later 

becomes known or available to you, you must supplement your response. Moreover, 

should you find at any time after the submission of your response that any portion ofthe 

submitted irArmation is false or incorrect, you must notify EP A as soon as possible. 

Electronic Submissions 

To aid in our electronic recordkeeping efforts, we request that you provide all documents 

responsive to tins Lnfotmation request in an electronic format according to paragraphs 1 through 

6, below. These submissions are in lieu of hard copy. 

1. Provide all responsive documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) or similar format, 

unless otherwise requested in specific questions. If the PDFs are scanned images, 

perform at least Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for "image over text" to allow the 

document to be searchable. 

2. When specific questions request data in electronic spreadsheet form, provide the data and 

corresponding information in editable Excel or Lotus format, and not in image format, i f 

Excel or Lotus formats are not available, then the format should allow for data to be used 

in calculations by a standard spreadsheet program such as Excel or Lotus. 
3. Provide submission on physical media such as compact disk or flash drive. 

4. Provide a table of contents for each compact disk-or flash drive containing electronic 

documents submitted so that each document can be accurately identified in relation to 

'ryOWT-espOnse-.to^ 

organized by question number. In addition, each compact disk or flash drive should be 

-labeled appropriately (e.g,, Company Name, Disk 1 of 4 for Information Request 

Response, Date of Response). 

5. Documents claimed as confidential business information (CBI) must be submitted on 

separate disks/drives apart from the non-confidential information. This will facilitate 

appropriate records management and appropriate handling and protection ofthe CBI. 

Please follow the instructions in Appendix C for designating information as CBI. 

6. Certify that the attached files have been scanned for viruses and indicate what program 

was used, 

Definitions 

A l l terms used in this information request have their orrdinary meaning unless such terms are 

defined inthe CAA , 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq., or the National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste Combustors at 40 C.R R Part 63, Subpart EEE. 

1. The terms "document" and "documents" shall mean any object that records, stores, or 

presents information, and includes writings, memoranda, records, or information of any 

kind, formal or informal, whether wholly or partially handwritten or typed, whether in 

computer format, memory, or storage device, or in hardcopy, including any form or 

format of these. If in computer format or memory, each such document shall be provided 

in translation to a form useable and readable by EPA, with all necessary documentation 

and support. Al l documents in hard copy should also include attachments to or 

enclosures with any documents. 

2. The terms "relate to" or "pertain to" (or any form thereof) shall mean constituting, 

reflecting, representing, supporting, conttaalcting, referring to, stating, describing, 

recording, noting, embodying, containing, mmtioning, studying, analyzing, discussing, 

evaluating or relevant to, 
Appendix B 

Veolia must submit tbe foUowing information within 14 days, pursuant to Section 114(a) ofthe 

CAA , 42 U.S.C. § 7414(a). ^Questions refer to the facihty located at #7 Mobile Avenue, Sauget, 

Illinois. 

1. Provide the 1-minute average feedrates (fjounds/rnmute) for aU metals (including but not 

.limited to mercury, cadmium, lead, arsenic, beryUium, and chromium) for Incinerators 2, 

3, and 4 in an Excel-compatible format from June 1,2010 to the present. 

2. Provide the calculated 12-hour rolling average for all metal feedrates (pomds/minute) for 

Incinerators 2,3, and 4 in an Excel-compatible format from June 1,2010 to the present. 

Provide a detailed description of how the 12-hour rolling averages were calculated 

including all assumptions. Do not include instances where metals were not fed to the 

incinerator as part ofthe average. 
Appendix C 

Confidential Business and Personal Privacy Information 

Assertion Requirements 

You may assert a business confidentiality claim covering any parts of the information requested 

' 

Emission data provided under Section 114 ofthe CAA , 42 U.S.C. § 7414, is not entitled to 

confidential treatment under 40 C.F.R. Part 2. 

"Emission data" means, with reference to any source of emissions of any substance into the air: 

Information necessary to determine the identity, amount, frequency, concentration 

or other characteristics (to the extent related to air quality) of any emission which 

has been emitted by the source (or of any pollutant resulting from any emission by 

the source), or any combination ofthe foregoing; 

Information necessary to determine the identity, amount, frequency, concentration 

or other characteristics (to the extent related to air quality) ofthe emissions which, 

under an applicable standard oi limitation, the source was authorized to emit 

(mcluding to the extent necessary for such purposes, a description of the manner 

and rate of operation of the source); and 

A general description ofthe location and/or nature of the source to Ihe extent 

necessary to identify the source and to distinguish it from other sources 

(mcluding, to the extent necessary for such purposes, a description of the device, 

installation, or operation constituting the source). 

40 C.FJL § 2.301(aX2Xi)(A), (B) and (C). 

To make a confidentiality claim, submit the requested information and indicate that you are 

making a claim of confidentiality. Any document for which you make a claim of confidentiality 

should be marked by attaching a cover sheet stamped or typed with a caption or other suitable 

form of notice to indicate the intent to claim confidentiality. The stamped or typed caption or 

other suitable form of notice should employ language such as "trade secret" or "proprietary" or 

"company confidential" and indicate a date, if any, when the information should no longer be 

treated as confidential. Information covered by such a claim will be disclosed by EP A only to 

the extent pennitted and by means ofthe procedures set forth at Section 114(c) of the CA A and 

40 C.F.R Part 2. Allegedly confidential portions of otherwise non-confidential documents 

should be clearly identified. EPA will construe the failure to furnish a confidentiality claim with 

your response to the Request to Provide Information as a waiver of that claim, and the 

information may be made available to the pubhc without further notice to you. 
Determining Whether the Information is Entitled to Confidential Treatment 

A l l confidentiality claims are subject to EPA verification and must be made in accordance with 

40 C.F.R. § 2.208, which provides in part that you must satisfactorily show that you have taken 

reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality ofthe information and that you intend to 

, continue to do so? ibirt ^ 

legitimate means without your consent and that disclosure ofthe information is likely to cause 

substantial harm to your business's competitive position. 

Pursuant to 40 CF.R. Part 2, Subpart B, EPA may at any time send you a letter asking that you 

support your confidential business information (CBI) claim. If you receive such a letter, you 

must respond within the number of days specified by EPA. Failure to submit your comments 

within that time would be regarded as a waiver of your confidentiality claim or claims, and EP A 

may release the mformation. Ifyou receive such a letter, EP A wil l ask you to specify which 

portions of the information you consider confidential by page, paragraph, and sentence. Any 

information not specifically identified as subject to a confidentiality claim may be disclosed to 

the requestor without further notice to you. For each item or class of information that you 

identify as being CBI, EPA will ask that you answer the following questions, giving as much 

detail as possible: 

1. For what period of time do you request that the information be maintained as 

confidential, e.g., until a certain date, until the occurrence of a special event, or 

permanently? If the occurrence of a specific event will eliminate the need for 

confidentiality, please specify that event 

2. Monnation submitted to EPA becomes stale over time. Why should the 

infonnation you claim as confidential be protected for the time period specified in 

your answer to question number 1? 

3. What measures have you taken to protect the information claimed as confidential? 

Have you disclosed the information to anyone other than a governmental body or 

someone who is bound by an agreement not to disclose the infonnation further? 

If so, why should the infonnation still be considered confidential? 

4. Is Ihe irdbrmation contained in any publicly available databases, promotional 

publications, annual reports or articles? Is there any means by which a member of 

the public could obtain access to the information? Is the information of a land 

that you would customarily not release to the public? 

5. Has any governmental body made a determination as to confidentiality ofthe 

information? If so, please attach a copy ofthe determination. 

6. For each category of information claimed as confidential, explain with 

specificity why release ofthe information is likely to cause substantial harm to 

2 
your competitive position. Explain the specific nature of those harmful effects, 

why they should be viewed as substantial and the causal relationship between 

disclosure and such harmful effects. How could your competitors make use of 

this information to your detriment? 

7.; ©o-youassertf e 

basis? Please explain the reason for your assertion. If you assert that the 

information is voluntarily submitted information, explain whether and why 

disclosure of me .information would tend to lessen the availabihty to EP A of 

similar information in the future. 

8. Is there any other information you deem relevant to EPA's determination 

regarding your claim of business confidentiality? 

If you receive a request for a substantiation letter from the EP A y» u bear the burden of 

substantiating your confidentiality claim. Conclusory allegations will be given little or no 

weight in the detenrnnation. In substantiating your CBI claim(s), you must bracket all text so 

claimed and mark it "CBI." Infonnation so designated will be disclosed by EP A only to the 

extent allowed by and by means of the procedures set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart B, If 

you fail to claim the infonnation as confidential, it may be made available to the public without 

further notice to you. 

Personal Privacy Infonnation 

Please segregate any personnel, medical and similar files from your responses and include that 

irjformation on a separate sheets) marked as "Personal Privacy Infonnation," Disclosure of such 

information to the general public may constitute an invasion of privacy. 
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 

L Loretta Shaffer, certify that I sent a Request to Provide Information Pursuant to the 

Clean Air Act by Certified Mai l Return Receipt Requested, to: 

Doug Harris 

General Manager 

Veolia Environmental Services 

#7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, Dlinois 62201 

I also certify that I sent a copy of the Request to Provide Information Pursuant to the Clean 

A ir Act by First Class Mail to: 

Ray PilapiL Manager 

Compliance and Systems Management Section 

Bureau of Air 

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 

1021 North Grand Avenue 

Springfield, Illinois 62702 

Certified Mail Receipt Numto: 7* 0 f /j,4Q (riMf 1^0 JS 
VES019283.pdf 
Comments by Michael Fuchs 

on behalf of Veolia ES Technical Solutions. L.LC. 

on the Draft Title V Permit and the Statement of Basis Dated October 2014 

I, Michael Fuchs, being over the age of 18 and of sound mind, state and depose under oath 

as follows: 

1. I am a Project Manager in the Measurements Group in URS Corporation's Austin, 

Texas office. I primarily manage projects related to the treatment of hazardous 

waste (primarily combustion); emissions measurements including source testing; 

and regulatory compliance (RCRA, TSCA , and HW C MACT ) for hazardous waste 

combustion facilities, I prepare test plans and quality assurance project plans 

(QAPPs); supervise trial burns and related projects; and prepare reports and 

regulatory filings. Many of the test programs include the use of continuous 

emission monitoring systems (CEMS). URS has been working with Veolia's 

Sauget facility in meeting regulatory requirements of the HW C MACT . I have 

attached my curriculum vitae hereto as Attachment 1 and incorporate it herein. 

2. I have reviewed portions of the Draft Title V Permit and the Statement of Basis for 

DRAF T Air Pollution Control Title V Permit to Operate No. 

V-IL-1716300103-2014-10 dated October 2014 issued to Veolia ES Technical 

Solutions, L.L.C. ("Veolia") in Sauget, IL. I focused in particular on the portions 

of the Draft Permit and Statement relating to the Cooper Enviromnental Services, 

L L C XactTM 640 Multi-Metal Continuous Emissions Monitoring System. 

3. I have almost 40 years of experience in conducting air pollution emission 

measurements and assessing the performance of air pollution measurement 

technologies at numerous combustion sources. Through projects I have performed 

at URS over the years, I am familiar with the measurement of metals emissions and 

-1-

VES019283 
with CEM S technology. 

4, Due to my familiarity with metals emissions measurement and CEM S technology, 

Veolia requested that I review the Statement ofBasis. I am familiar with the basic 

fundamentals ofthe multi-metals CEM S XactTM 640 device referenced in the 

Statement ofBasis. The XactTM multi-metals CEM S was developed by Cooper 

Environmental Services, LLC . As stated by EP A in the Statement ofBasis, the 

XactTM multi-metals CEM S had been marketed by Pall Corporation, but now 

Cooper Environmental Services, LL C holds the exclusive manufacture and 

marketing rights for the XactTM. The XactTM multi-metals CEM S uses X-ray 

Fluorescence for the measurement of metals collected on filter tape. 

5, USEPA's Statement of Basis provides that "multi-metals CEM S ... have been 

demonstrated to be reliable for measuring metals emissions from a hazardous waste 

combustor ", and "has monitored side-by-side evaluations of multi-metals CEM S 

with EP A Method 29," Statement ofBasis at Section 5.3.4. The Statement of 

Basis also states "US EP A recently evaluated at several facilities a commercial 

version of a multi-metals CEM S (the XactTM multi-metals CEMS) " although no 

citation is given for a report of this testing. 

6, In USEPA's website, at http://www.epa.gov/ttnemc01/monitor.html under Metals 

and Mercury Emissions Monitoring, EP A states "In 1996 Performance 

Specification 10 (PS10) was proposed in conjunction with the original Hazardous 

Waste Combustor NESHAP , but because the measurement technology had not 

been fully developed and demonstrated, the specification was not promulgated." 

PS 10 remains as a proposed methodology. Therefore, USEP A should identify in 

its response to comments what the Statement ofBasis means that "multi-metals 

VES019284 
CEM S ... have been demonstrated to be reliable for measuring metals emissions 

from a hazardous waste combustor ". Since the accuracy of the XactTM multi-metals 

CEM S has not been demonstrated against EP A Method 29 with samples collected 

directly from a source by both the XactTM and by EP A Method 29, as is the preferred 

approach in the proposed PS 10, and since the HW C MAC T requires that Method 

29 be used to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards for metals, the 

accuracy of the XactTM multi-metals CEM S has not been demonstrated. 

E P A also states in the Statement ofBasis that "El i Lilly Company received 

approval from the EP A to use this instrument (i.e., the multi-metals CEM S 

developed by Cooper Environmental Services) as a CEM S as an alternative in lieu 

of parameter monitoring on a hazardous waste incinerator", and that the "US Army 

has successfully installed and evaluated one of these CEM S on a hazardous waste 

incinerator. These studies resulted in several monitoring methods and performance 

standards for the x-ray technology. These documents may be found under the Otlier 

Methods section of this web site." The Other Test Methods listed on EPA's 

website that pertain to multi-metals CEM S include: 

• Other Test Method 16 (OT M 16) - Specifications for X-Ray Fluorescence 

Based Multi-Metals CEM S at Stationary Sources; 

• Other Test Method 17 (OT M 17) - Determination of Metal Concentration in 

CES' XactTM CEM S Stilling Chamber Using Filters and Solid Sorbents with 

X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis; 

• Other Test Method 18 (OT M 18) - Performance Specifications for a 

Quantitative Reference Aerosol Generator; 

• Other Test Method 19 (OT M 19) - Determination of Metal Concentrations in 

Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure); 
• Other Test Method 20 (OTM 20) - Quality Assurance Requirements for X-Ray 

Fluorescence Based Multi-Metals CEM S at Stationary Sources; and 

• Other Test Method 21 (OTM 21) - Standard Operating Procedure for 

Generating a Quantitative Multi-Metals Reference Aerosol with CES QAG . 

8. These methods were prepared by Cooper Environmental Services, LLC . While 

these methods were ostensibly produced using the cumulative knowledge garnered 

by Cooper Environmental Services on the operating requirements and nuances of 

the XactTM multi-metals CEMS , OTMs 16-2 1 were prepared specifically for, and 

in support of, the Alternative Monitoring Petition for the use of the XactTM to 

monitor metals emissions on the hazardous waste incinerator at El i Lilly's 

Tippecanoe Laboratories manufacturing facility near Lafayette, Indiana. The 

XactTM multi-metals CEM S was primarily to show there were no, to very low, 

concentrations of metals emissions from Eli Lilly's incinerator. This technically is 

different than measuring an actual, and varying, concentration of metals. The 

H W C MAC T states that Method 29 (40 CFR 60, Appendix A , Method 29) must be 

used to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards for mercury; the 

semivolatile metals cadmium and lead; and the low volatility metals arsenic, 

beryllium and chromium. Despite this mandate, on the Eli Lill y incinerator, 

Cooper Environmental Services, LLC's OTMs did not use Method 29 to 

demonstrate the accuracy ofthe XactTM multi-metals CEMS . 

9. The significance of Cooper Environmental Services, LLC's failure to utilize 

Method 29 is demonstrated by comparing proposed Performance Specification 10, 

which was discussed earlier, to OT M 16. 

10. On EPA's website, OT M 16 is titled Specifications for X-Ray Fluorescence Based 

Multi-Metals CEMS at Stationary Sources; while, the copy of OT M 16 

VES019286 
downloaded from EPA's website bears the title Performance Specification YY: 

Specifications for X-Ray Fluorescence Based Multi-Metals CEMS at Stationary 

Sources, Performance specifications (PS) promulgated by EP A include a 

requirement to demonstrate the Relative Accuracy (RA) of the monitoring system 

using an EPA-approved and validated test method, termed a Reference Method 

(RM). In PS 10, the preferred (or primary) method for measurement of R A is 

against an EPA-approved test method (i.e., Method 29). This is consistent with 

every performance specification promulgated by EPA . In comparison, 

Performance Specification Y Y (OT M 16) does not include a requirement for RA , 

PS Y Y includes Relative Bias Criteria-Accuracy and Precision and Linearity Test 

Criteria - Accuracy and Precision. As cited in the proposed PS 10, the R M to be 

used to evaluate the R A of the multi-metals CEM S is 40 CFR 60, Appendix A , 

Method 29, and "the R A of the CEMS , relative to the RM , must be no greater than 

20 percent of the mean value of the R M test data in terms of units ofthe emission 

standard for each metal, or 10 percent of the applicable standard, whichever is 

greater". EP A Method 29 was a draft method when PS 10 was proposed. Proposed 

PS 10 does however state that an alternative procedure to determine RA , called 

total system calibration, was to be developed and added as an appendix to PS 10. 

This alternative procedure has apparently not yet been developed by EPA. It can 

however be stated that OT M 16 fails to comply with the HW C MACT , at 40 CFR 

63.1208(b)(2), (3), and (4) which states that Method 29 must be used to 

demonstrate compliance with the emission standards for mercury, cadmium and 

lead, and arsenic, beryllium and chromium. 
The HW C MAC T states that Method 29 (40 CFR 60, Appendix A , Method 29) 

must be used to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards for mercury; 

the semivolatile metals cadmium and lead; and the low volatility metals arsenic, 

beryllium and chromium. Method 29 includes a number of requirements to 

address potentially critical aspects of the measurement of metals emissions from 

stationary sources that are not included in the operation of the XactTM multi-metals 

CEMS . This could potentially lead to the XactTM multi-metals CEM S providing 

inaccurate and/or inconsistent results. 

• A requirement of Method 29 is that the sample be collected isokinetically at 

multiple points across the stack to ensure that a representative sample of the 

stack gas is collected, including both aerosol and gas-phase constituents. For 

the results of Method 29, and all isokinetic sampling methods, to be acceptable, 

the sampling must be within 10% of isokinetic (i.e., 100±10%). This 

requirement is rigorously enforced. If the sampling is not within 10% of the 

isokinetic sampling rate then that sample will not be accepted by regulatory 

agencies. PS Y Y states in Section 1.3.2 "your multi-metals CEM S should 

sample from the source at a flow rate which is within 10 percent of true 

isokinetic". However, operating data for installed and evaluated XactTM CEMS 

do not report the isokinetic sampling rate. As stated in the Statement ofBasis at 

5.3.4, "The process begins when an isokinetic sub-sample of stack gas is taken 

from the stilling chamber and drawn through a chemically-reactive filter tape." 

The stilling chamber is a component of the sample acquisition system, and is a 

vessel into which sample gas is drawn from the source. This should not be 

confused as withdrawing an isokinetic sample from the source itself as required 

by Method 29. PS 10 does not require sample be drawn from the stack 

isokinetically, but it does require that the R A of the multi-metals CEM S be 

compared to Method 29, and sample gas for Method 29 must be drawn from the 

source isokinetically. 
• Following collection of the Method 29 sample, the entire sampling train is 

rinsed (with reagents specified in the method), and all ofthe components 

recovered from the sampling train (from the nozzle to the impingers used to 

collect gas-phase metals) are analyzed for metals in a laboratory (using 

methods specified in Method 29). Results for Method 29 are specific to 

individual metals, and include results for all components recovered and 

analyzed. In comparison, while different sample collection configurations are 

found for applications of the XactTM multi-metals CEMS , the sample acquisition 

systems always include a transport line, and may include a stilling chamber, 

water trap, and/or drying chamber. None ofthe components from the sample 

acquisition system are recovered or analyzed for inclusion in the results for the 

XactTM multi-metals CEMS . This difference between Method 29 and the XactTM 

multi-metals CEM S is potentially critical to the accuracy of the results of the 

XactTM multi-metals CEMS . Specifically for mercury, experience has shown 

that mercury may condense and then re-vaporize in the sample acquisition 

system, depending on conditions. This phenomenon could occur for other 

metals, depending on the configuration and conditions of the sample 

acquisition system, and if experienced, the XactTM multi-metals CEM S will not 

be quantifying a sample representative of the source (i.e., the stack gas), and 

potentially, inaccurate data will be collected. 

Due to the design and operation of the air pollution control systems, the moisture 

content of stack gases from Veolia's incinerators is variable and considerably 

higher than most incinerators, typically from 30 to 45%. While Cooper 

Environmental Services has assured EP A that the XactTM can operate reliably at 

moisture contents above 40% (see Statement ofBasis footnote 58), no studies 

supporting Cooper Environmental Services' assurance are cited. Concentration of 

moisture in the stack gas from Veolia's incinerators could have a negative impact 

upon the operation of multi-metals CEM S (i.e., its reliability), and the CEM S 

ability to produce valid metals data in the stack gas from those incinerators. To my 
knowledge, the Xact 1

" multi-metals CEM S has not been operated on an incinerator 

having the concentration of moisture in the stack gas from Veolia's incinerators, 

and thus has not been demonstrated and proven to be reliable for measuring actual 

emissions of metals at the stack gas moisture concentrations that would be 

experienced at Veolia. 

13. A j ournal article authored by Hay et al (K. James Hay, Bruce E. Johnsen, Paul R. 

Ginochio & John A . Cooper (2006) Relative Accuracy Testing of an X-Ray 

Fluorescence-Based Mercury Monitor at Coal-Fired Boilers, Journal ofthe Air and 

Waste Management Association, 56:5,657-665, DOI: 10, 

1080/10473289.2006.10464471) presents the results of relative accuracy testing of 

the XactTM multi-metals CEMS . While relative accuracy (RA) testing of the XactTM 

multi-metals CEM S was performed, R A was not demonstrated for samples 

collected directly from the source (i.e., stack) as would be required for other 

performance specifications, including the proposed PS 10. An d R A was measured 

between the XactTM multi-metals CEM S and Method 29 only for mercury and 

arsenic. Results are not reported for the other metals regulated by the HW C 

MACT , beryllium, cadmium, chromium, and lead. Sample was drawn from the 

source through a sample acquisition system including a transport line, water trap, 

and drying chamber. Compressed air was injected into the sample acquisition 

system upstream ofthe drying chamber. Following the drying chamber, a portion 

ofthe sample gas was drawn into the XactTM multi-metals CEMS , and the remainder 

ofthe sample gas was collected in paired (i.e., two) Method 29 sampling trains. 

Relative accuracy testing performed in this manner is a measure of the relative 

accuracy ofthe analytical portion of the XactTM multi-metals CEM S to Method 29, 

-8-

VES019290 
but is not a measure of the relative accuracy of the whole of the Xact multi-metals 

CEMS , including, but not limited to, the sampling and analytical components, 

against Method 29 also measured in the source (i.e., stack gas) as required by other 

performance specifications, including proposed PS 10. 

14. Evoniks Degussa Corporation purchased the Tippecanoe facility in 2010, and no 

longer uses a multi-metals CEM S on the incinerator at the Tippecanoe facility. The 

multi-metals CEM S is no longer in operation for functional and economic reasons. 

15. Footnote 60 in the Statement ofBasis states, "EP A understands that the U.S. 

Department of Defense has purchased three XactTM units for use at army munitions 

incinerators." Dennis Warchol with Veolia related to me in 2013 that he had 

spoken with Doug Barth, the Business Development Manager with Pall. Barth 

suggested Veolia contact Larry Wells with the U.S. Army at the Tooele Army 

Depot (TEAD) to obtain additional information on how the XactTM units have been 

utilized. Based upon Barth's recommendation, I contacted Wells on January 29, 

2013. Wells related that TEA D had two XactTM multi-metals CEM S with one 

installed on each ofthe two incinerators at TEAD . Of the two incinerators at 

TEAD , one is a unit used for testing and the other is used for production. The unit 

used for testing only operates periodically, while the production unit operates more 

often. Wells said that while there is a XactTM multi-metals CEM S at the test unit, he 

was not aware that it had ever been operated. Wells then introduced his colleague, 

Joe Peterson, who is involved in the operation/monitoring of the production 

furnace at TEAD . Peterson remembered that the XactTM multi-metals CEM S was 

installed on the production furnace and calibrated when it was acquired (he thought 

around 2007), and that testing ofthe production furnace was performed shortly 

-9-

VES019291 
thereafter that allowed comparison of measurements performed by the multi-metals 

CEM S to an EP A reference method. He remembered that the XactTM multi-metals 

CEM S was operated for about 15 to 20 days before it failed. Peterson said that the 

XactTM multi-metals CEM S has not operated since it failed. Based on the phone 

conversations with both Wells and Peterson, both ofthe XactTM multi-metals CEM S 

are still at TEAD , but are not in operation. 

16. The Third XactTM multi-metals CEM S referenced at footnote 60 is at the Crane 

Naval Surface Warfare Center in Crane, IN, and I understand that the instrumental 

monitoring system has been set up. However, the CEM S is not connected to, or 

drawing sample gas from, the stack of the unit as part of normal operations and 

therefore it is not truly installed. Additionally, munitions incinerators are not 

commercial hazardous waste incinerators. Munitions incinerators do not treat the 

broad range of wastes treated in a commercial incinerator and, unlike Veolia, the 

stack emissions from munitions incinerators do not have the same high moisture 

content, 

In closing, my assessment of the XactTM multi-metals CEM S is that it has not been 

demonstrated to operate reliably or produce accurate data when compared against an 

EPA-approved test method. Further, Cooper Environmental Services is the only vendor 

that purports to have developed a commercially available multi-metals CEMS . It is simply 

unprecedented for EP A to endorse the use of a specific vendor of an instrument, 

monitoring equipment, or other such system in a mandated regulatory or enforcement 

circumstance or for use in leau of a performance test. Further, to my knowledge, no 

multi-metals CEM S is in use as a parametric or in any other capacity on a commercial 

hazardous waste incinerator. 

-10-
FURTHE R AFFIAN T SAYET H NOT. 

Michael Fuchs 

SWOR N AN D SUBSCRIBED 

Before me this /Sd&y o f December 2014. 

Notary Public 

M y Commission Expires: 

.Vl-CJL./i-' 

j0W&\ , ^ORINDA MADSEN 

I fsfc^ l Notary Public, State of Texas 

VS5£?3&?

 M V Commission Expires 

J!4)ity February is, 2016 
'•" Pis j eel Management 

v Air Regulators 

Compliance {Federal 

and Stale, RCRA . 

THC A, and I IWC 

MAC ! ) 

v' Source Lmissiotis 

letting: I .S, I-PA 40 

C FR Fan 60 and 75, 

SW-X Id, and AS I'M 

Sampling Methods 

•>' 1 rial Burn Plans, 

Cornpreheiish c 

Performance l est (CP!} 

Plans, Confirmatory 

Perfonnance I'esi 

(CfP'l I Plans and 

Quality Assurance 

Proj eel Plans 

v

 Trial Burn, CPT. and 

CIT 1' Reporting 

v I IWC MAC T 

Regulatory Pilings 

HS. Chemistry. Souihwest 

Texas State Cnhersity 

(now Texas State 

University), 1973 

I lazardtHi.s Waste 

Operations k, 

hmergeney Response 

(IIAZWOPP.R) 

HA/WOPF K Refresher. 

Annually 

Basic Pius Refresher. 

Annimlh 

personnel at TOCDF. 

> Project Manager, TOCD F Preparation of AM R anil MPM ' Sorbent Traps, 2006, 2007, 2008,2009 Tooele, 

UT. URS prepares the AM R 13-bed. spiked) and MP M (2-bed. unspiked) sorbent traps lor TOCDF. The AM R 

and MP'M sorbent traps are shipped to TOCDF weekly. 

• Project Manager, TOCD F Quarterly Calibration of Appendix K Meter Boxes, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 

Tooele, UT. CRS performed the quarterly calibrations of the Appendix K meter boxes as required by Appendix 

Mr Michael Fuchs is a Principal Project Managei in the Measurements (iroup in 

I IRS' Austin office, and has o\ er Ts y can of experience doing en \ ironmenial 

consulting. Oscrihc past 25+ years, he has focused on the pennitting of 

hazardous waste combustion units including RCRA and I SCA incinerators, 

R( RA B11- (Boiler and Industrial furnace) units, and units subject to the Au/mw// 

f'nn,\sii»i Sitiih/tifiis fur I!tizai\hiii\ iir I'ullunims imm IlaTunlniis U\i\h' 

t ',;/«/t«s/Mr.s ti e.. the //IPC ,t/J( '/'). 

Mi I uchs began his cai eer perfuming source testing and now manages projects 

lor both industrial and government clients while continuing lo pro\ ide hands-on 

participation. Mr. fuchs primarily manages projects related to die treatment of 

hazardous waste (primarily combustion); emissions measurements including 

source testing: and regulatory compliance (RCRA. I St \. and 11\\ C MA<' I I for 

hazardous waste combustion facilities, I le actively participates in those projects 

preparing test plans and OAPPs: supers ising trial bunts, t PIs. and related 

projects; and preparing reports and regulator} filings. Mr. I uchs manages the trial 

burns, CPTs, and related projects anil the de\ elopmenl, installation, and annual 

RA'I As ofthe mercury monitorinu system at "PCX'DP. 

• Project Manager, I OCDI Alternative Monitoring Request (AMR) 

Mercun Monitorinu of the MPT. 2t!0o. Tooele. I T. \n \M R Oc-1 ( red 

and prepared lor the MPF at TOCDF (an incinerator) to pio\ ide HWC MA C I" 

compliance data lor the mercuiy standard, 'I he AM R is based on Appendix K. 

\ IRS developed the sampling anil analytical procedures, procured all .systems for 

sampling and annly sis. transferred the sampling and analysis procedures to 

FOt DF. and trained peisonnei at K K'DF, SOPs were ptcpared for integia) 

procedures, 

• Project Manager, TOCD F RAT A ofthe AM R Mercury Monitoring 

System, Annually 2006 - 201.2, Tooele, UT. A RATA (Relative Accuracy Test 

Audit) ofthe AM R mercuiy' compliance monitoring system of the MPF (I.e., an 

incinerator at TOCDF) is performed annually in accordance with EPA 

Performance Specification (PS) 12A, The RAT A was initially performed in 

2006 using EPA .Method 29 as the reference method. Since 2006, the reference 

method used in the RATAs has; been FPA Method 30B with Ohio Lumex on 

site analysis. 

• Project Manager, TOCDF Mercury Process Monitoring for Mercury from 

the MPF , 2006, Tooele, UT. Mercuiy Process Monitoring (MPM) ofthe MPF 

was performed using an adaptation of Appendix K with on site analysts using an 

Ohio Lumex. analy zer, URS developed the sampling and analytical procedures, 

transferred the sampling and analysis procedures to TOCDF, and trained 

VES019293a 
• Project Manager, Veolia HW G MAC T CPT, 2(106, Port. Arthur, TX . URS performed and reported the HWC 

MAC T CPT of Veolia's incinerator in Port Arthur, TX . Veolia uses a proprietary process to control mercury 

emissions, 'fhe mercuiy standard was not demonstrated in the initial performance ofthe CPT. The proprietary 

process was optimized, including testing. Testing for mercury during Ihe optimization phase was performed using 

Appendix K with on site analysis using an Ohio Etirnex mercury analyzer. The mercury standard was successfully 

demonstrated during the optimization tests (using Appendix K) and the subsequent CPT (using EPA .Method 29). 

• Project Manager, EG&G , TOCD F MP F and LIC2 Mustard ATBs, January 2007, Tooele, UT. The TOCDF 

Metal Parts Furnace (MPF) exhaust gas was simultaneously sampled bv U.S, EPA Melhod 5/SW-846 Method 

0050: U.S. BPA Method 29: SW-846 Method 0023A; SW-846 Method 0010 for Semivolatiles; SW-846 Metliod 

0010 for Total Organic Emissions (GRAV/TCO): SW-846 Metliod 0040: SW-846 Method 003 I; and CEMS for 

CCK NO,, SOan d TFIC. The same testing was performed on the Liquid Incinerator {F.1C2) exhaust gas following 

the completion ofthe MPF ATB. Mr. Fuchs served as the Project Manager for these trial burns and provided onsite supervision of ihe performance ofthe trial burns, Mr, Fuchs was responsible for providing daily sampling data 

and updates for the performance ofthe trial burns. He also managed and participated in the preparation ofthe 

Sampling ami Analytical Reports and QA/QC Reports for the MPF and LIC2 Mustard ATBs. 

• Project Manager, EG&G, TOCD F MP F Secondary Waste Demonstration Test (SWDT), March 2006, 

Tooele, UT. 'Fhe 'I'OCDF MPF exhaust was simultaneously sampled by U.S. EPA M C I I K K I 5/SW-846 Method 

0050; U.S. EPA Method 29; SW-846 Method 0023A: SW-846 Method 0010 for semivolatiles; SW-846 Method 

0010 for Total Organic Emissions; SW-846 Method 0040; SW-846 Method 003 I: and CEMS for CCE, NO,. SCF. 

and THC, Mr. Fuchs served as ihe Project Manager for the SWDT and provided on-site supervision ofthe 

performance ofthe test. Mr. Fuchs was responsible for providing daily sampling data and updates for the 

performance ofthe test. He also managed .and participated in the preparation ofthe Sampling and Analytical 

Reports and QA/QC1 Reports for the SWDT, 

• Project: Manager, Veolia Environmental Services, CPT, RCR A Periodic Testing, arid TSC A Risk Burn, 

April-July 2006, Port Arthur, TX . Mr. Fuchs served as the Project Manager for ihe tests - an initial test, miniburns, and* a final test. During the April 2006 CPT for the Interim Standards ofthe HWC MACT , RCRA Periodic 

Testing, and TSCA risk burn, ihe incinerator exhausl was simultaneously sampled by U.S. KPA Method 5/26A. 

U.S. BPA Method 29. SW-846 Method 0010 for semivolatile POHC and organics, SW-846 Method 0023A for 

dioxins/furans. SW-846 Method 0010 for PCBs. SW-8J6 Method 0030 for volatile organics, SW-846 Method 

0061. for CrfVI), and CEMS for NO, and THC. Mr. Fuchs worked closely with Veolia. and was the primary author 

ofthe lest plan and QAPP, Mr. Fuchs provided on-site supervision ofthe perfomiance of tlie tests, He managed 

and participated in the preparation ofthe final reports and preparation ofthe Notification of Compliance. 

• Project Manager, EncrSol Technologies, Plasma Energy Pyrolysis Sysfem (PEPS) Testing, August 2006, 

Springfield, VA . Managed the project involving testing the PEPS to determine its suitability for processing 

secondary waste from chemical demilitarization sites. The PEPS exhaust was simultaneously sampled by ICS. 

EPA Method 5...SW-846 Method 0050. U.S. EPA, Method 29, SW-846 Method 0010. and SW-846 Method 0031. 

• On-site Project Manager/Test Supervisor, Waste Control Specialists, October 2004, Andrews,.TX. Served as 

On-Site Project Manager and Test Supervisor for evaluation ofthe (Jeomelt process operated by Waste Control 

Specialists was performed by simultaneously sampling the exhausl by U.S. EPA Method 5/26A; U.S. EPA Method 

29; CARD Method 428 for dioxins/furans and PCBs; SW-846 Method 0010 for semivolatile organics; SW-846 

Method 0030 for volatile organics; and CEMS lor Oj, CCK. CO, NO,, SO,, and THC. Mr, Fuchs also managed and 

participated in tlie preparation ofthe report. 

• Project Manager, EG&G , TOCD F LIC2 V X ATB, February 2004, Tooele, UT. The TOCDF LIC2 exhaust 

was simultaneously sampled by U.S. EPA Method 5/SW-846 Method 0050; U.S. EPA Method 29; SW-846 

Method 0023A; SW-846 Method 0010 for semivolatile organics; SW-846 Method 0010 for lota I Organic 

Emissions; SW-846 Method 0040; SW-846 Metliod 003 I for volatile organics; and CEMS for CO?, NO,, SO:, and 

THC. Mr. Fuchs served as the Project Manager for this trial bum and provided on-site supervision ofthe 

performance ofthe trial bum. Mr, Fuchs was responsible for providing daily sampling data and updates for the 

performance ofthe trial burns. He. managed and participated in the preparation ofthe Sampling and Analytical 

Report for the EIC2 V X A'FB. 

VES019293b 
• Project Manager, Veolia Environmental Services, Confirmatory Performance Test, 2011, Sauget, IL. Mr. 

Fuchs served as the Project Manager for the Confirmatory Performance Tests (CfPTs) required by the HWC 

M ACT. In these tests the incinerator exhaust was sampled by U.S. EPA Method 0023 A for dioxins/furans. Mr. 

Fuchs worked closely with Veolia, and was the primary author ofthe test plan and QAPP, and he managed and 

participated in the preparation ofthe final reports and preparation ofthe Notification of Compliance. 

• Project Manager, Veolia Environmental Services, CP T and RCR A Periodic Testing, December 2011, Port 

Arthur, TX, Mr. Fuchs served as the Project Manager for the CPT' for the Final Replacement Standards of the 

I IWC MAC T and the RCRA Periodic Testing. In these tests the incinerator exhaust was simultaneously sampled 

by U.S. EPA Method 5/26A, U.S. EPA Method 29, SW-846 Method 0023A for dioxins/furans, SW-846 Method 

0061 for Cr(VT). and CEMS for NO, and TFIC. Mr, Fuchs worked closely with Veolia, and was the primaiy author 

ofthe test plan and QAPP. Mr. Fuchs provided on-site supervision ofthe performance ofthe tests. Fie managed 

and participated in. the preparation ofthe final reports and preparation of tlie Notification of Compliance. 

URS Piige 3 

VES019293C 
VES019294.pdf 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 5 

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD 

CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 

[SEP 2 7 2013] 

REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF: 

Douglas Harris, General Manager 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, Illinois 62201 

Re: Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C.'s Comprehensive Performance Test Plans for 

Incinerators 2, 3, and 4 

Dear Mr. Harris: 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. (Veolia) submitted its Comprehensive Performance Test 

(CPT) plans and Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Incinerators 2,3, and 4 at its 

Sauget, Illinois facility to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on September 5, 2012. 

Veolia is requhed to conduct a CPT pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, 

Subpart EEE (HWC MACT) . Prior to commencing the CPT, Veolia must submit a complete 

C PT plan for each incinerator to EPA for review and approval or intent to deny, as required by 

40 C.F.R. § 63.1207(e). The HW C MAC T lists specific information that hazardous waste 

combustors must provide in their CPT plans. EP A discovered that Veolia's September 5,2012 

C PT plans were missing required information, so on May 13,2013 EP A notified Veolia of its 

intent to deny the approval of its September 5, 2012 CPT plans and provided significant 

comments. In response to EPA's notice and comments, numerous emails and conversations, and 

an inclusion of a modified 26A testing method to establish HCI/CI2 (total chlorine) operating 

parameter limits, Veolia submitted revised CPT plans on September 26, 2013. EP A finds that 

the revised CPT plans and QAPP are complete, as required by the HW C MACT . Therefore, EP A 

approves Veolia's September 26,2013 revised CPT plans and QAPP, for Incinerators 2, 3, and 4. 

EPA's approval ofthe September 26, 2013 test plans is solely for the purpose of conducting a 

C PT consistent with the HW C MACT . If Veolia intends to rely on the performance test to 

establish a mercury system removal efficiency for Veolia's RCR A permit, Veolia should consult 

with the appropriate RCR A permitting authority before finalizing its CPT plans. 

E P A would also like to clarify that the Agency's approval of this CPT plan or lack of comment 

on ancillary references i n the CPT plan, such as Veolia's Feedrate Analysis Plan, description of 

its feed streams, or extrapolation methods, should not be deemed to be approval of such ancillary 

references. Furthermore, EP A would like Veolia to be aware that "demonstrate compliance," as 

used in the CPT plan, relates to stack emissions corresponding to feed rates used during the CPT. 

It does not guarantee or confirm past or future compliance with the HW C MACT . EP A believes 

the results of the CPT can demonstrate compliance at the time ofthe CPT due to the rigorous 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (100% Post-Consumer) 
waste feed sampling conducted prior to and during the test. However, based upon an EPA 

investigation of Veolia's Sauget facility, it is apparent that this type of comprehensive waste 

stream sampling is not done on a day-to-day basis at Veolia. 

If you have any questions regarding this response, please contact Shannon Downey at (312) 353-

2151 or Eleanor Kane at (312) 353-4840, of my staff. 

Sincerely, 

Sara Breneman 

Chief 

A ir Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Branch 

2 

VES019295 
VES019296.pdf 
Pre-draft permit discussion 

Veolia Renewal Permit 

September 30,2014 

Name Company Phone email 

David Ogulei EPA 312-353-0987 ogulei.david@epa.gov 

Jane Woolums EPA 312-886-6720 woolums.jane@epa.gov 

Genevieve Damico EPA 312-353-4761 da m ico.genevieve@epa.gov 

Andrea Morgan EPA 312-353-6058 morgan.andrea@epa.gov 

r J^^^^r^)yi^,^tyiiCM potiorH. S&K. 

4 <3£G^Mtd9*Q^«^-tew 

"hr 

.rf.. , ,— .1 f ; f - k. „rr.u,.j.T.,.,. i i J <y 

jepev&v, ft/tt-tH dl vmh'cjL, .{#hj 

VES019296 
VES019297.pdf 
i ; 

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y 

REGIO N 5 

IN TH E MATTE R OF : 

Veolia Environmental Services 

#7 Mobile'Avenue"" , ;; , , v ,...,_,,„ : ,.,, , ,., j. 

Sauget, Illinois 62201 

ATTENTION : 

Doug Harris 

General Manager 

Request to Provide Information Pursuant to the Clean Air Ac t 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is requiring Veolia Environmental Services 

(Veolia or you) to submit certain information about your facihty at #7 Mobile Avenue, Sauget, 

Illinois. Appendix A provides the instructions needed to answer this information request, 

including instructions for electronic submissions. Appendix B specifies the infonnation that you. ; 

must submit. Yo u must send this information to us within 14 calendar days after you receive this 

request 

We are issuing this information request under section 114(a) of the Clean Air Act (the 

Act), 42 U.S.C. § 7414(a). Section 114(a) authorizes the Administrator of EP A to require the 

submission of information.- The Arljninistrator has delegated this authority to the Director of the 

Air and Radiation Division, Region 5. 

Veolia owns and operates hazardous waste incinerators at the Sauget, Illinois facility. 

We are requesting this information to determine whether your emission source is complying with 

the Hazardous Waste Combustor MACT . 

VES019297 
Veolia must send all required mformation to: 

Attn: Compliance Tracker, AE-17J 

A ir Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 5 

77 WestTacksbn Boulevard : •• - .-

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Veolia must submit all required information under an authorized signature with the 

following certification: 

I certify under penalty of law that I have examined and am familiar with the 

infonnation in the enclosed documents, including all attachments. Based on my 

inquiry of those individuals with primary responsibility for obt^ning the 

information, I certify that the statements and information are, to the best of my 

knowledge and belief, true and complete. I am aware that there are significant 

penalties for knowingly submitting false statements and information, including 

the possibility of fines or imprisonment pursuant to Section 113(c)(2) ofthe Clean 

A ir Act and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1341. 

A s explained more fully in Appendix C, you may assert a claim of business 

confidentiality under 40 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart B for any part ofthe information you- submit to 

us. Information subject to a business confidentiality claim is available to the public only to the 

extent, and by means of the procedures, set forth at 40 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart B. If you do not 

assert a business confidentiality claim when you submit the information, EP A may make this 

iriformation available to the public without further notice. Yo u should be aware, moreover, that 

pursuant to Section 114(c) ofthe CA A and 40 C.F.R, § 2.301(a) and (f), emissions data, 

standards and limitations are not entitled to confidential treatment and shall be made available to 

the public not^mstanding any assertion of a business confidentiality claim. Appendix C 

provides additional information regarding tbe meaning and scope ofthe term "emissions data." 
This iiiforrnation request is not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

et seq., because it seeks collection of infonnation from specific individuals or entities as part of 

an administrative action or investigation. 

We may/use any inforrnatim^ to this request in an administrative, 

civil or criminal action. 

Failure to comply fully with this information request may subject Veolia to an 

enforcement action under Section 113 of the CAA , 42 U.S.C. § 7413. 

Y o u should direct any questions about this information Request to Shannon Downey at 

(312) 353-2151 and downev.shannon@epa.gov or Eleanor Kane at (312) 353-4840 and 

kane,eleanor(5),epa.gov. 

Date 

A ir and Radiation Division