alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Request for Additional Information - Mathew Roderick 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Roderick: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA-2015-2388). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which 

is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request 

any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/10/2015. If we do not 

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us (202) 267-9677.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jake Troutman

 

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. 

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:31 PM 

To: matt@airequipco.com 

Cc: May, Rick (FAA) 

 

Request for Additional Information - Mathew Roderick Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note... 8/26/2015
Exhibit 10.19





WAIVER


I, the undersigned officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. hereby execute this waiver as of the date set forth below, in connection with The South Financial Group, Inc.’s participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program.
 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.
 
 I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program.
 
 This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship.
 
 
 Dated: _____________, 20__

_______________________________[Name][Title]
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 08

- 00061

- CV

JAMES SCOT THOMAS

, Appellant

v.

WAYNE E. BREWER, HEC TOR M. ORTIZ

AND DERRELL W. SUTTO N

, Appellee s

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 24018

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellee s ha ve not filed a

response. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

FELIPE REYNA

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyn a Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 5, 2008

[CV06]
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-58396,  33-67218, 33-58797, 33-56721, 333-45402
and 333-59722) of Stanley Furniture  Company,  Inc. of our report dated February
13  2004  relating  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Greensboro, North Carolina
February 20, 2004
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of National Lampoon, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                         By: /s/ Daniel S. Laikin
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             By: Daniel S. Laikin
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             November 14, 2006


                                         By: /s/ Jeff Gonzalez
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             By: Jeff Gonzalez
                                             Interim Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Principal Accounting Officer
                                             November 14, 2006


                                         By: /s/ Bruce K. Long
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             By: Bruce K. Long
                                             President
                                             November 14, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

               SUBSIDIARIES OF INTEREP NATIONAL RADIO SALES, INC.


     Interep has the following subsidiaries:


                                                          Name Under Which
                                                           Subsidiary Does
           Name                    State of Organization     Business
      American Radio Sales, Inc.          New York             Same
      McGavern Guild, Inc.                New York             Same
      D&R Radio, Inc.                     New York             Same
      Infinity Radio Sales, Inc.          New York             Same
      Allied Radio Partners, Inc.         New York             Same
      Caballero Spanish Media, LLC        New York             Same
      Public Radio Network, Inc.          New York             Same
      Interep New Media, Inc.             New York             Same
      Interep Interactive, Inc.           Delaware             Same
      Cybereps, Inc.                      Delaware             Same
      Streaming Audio, Inc.               Delaware             Same
EXHIBIT 32



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
its knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                 |  |                                         |  |                    
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|                 |  | Bank of America, N.A.,                 
|                 |  | Trustee for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
|                 |  |                                        
|October 19, 2004 |  | By                                      |  | /s/ NANCY G. WILLIS
|                 |  |                                         |  | Nancy G. Willis    
|                 |  |                                         |  | Vice President
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-30437 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JOSEPH MELBERT, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana

(94-CR-20069) May 30, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joseph Melbert (Melbert), Harry Randolph, Louis Melbert and
Pamela Griffin were charged in a nine count superseding indictment. Melbert was charged under counts 1-7 and count 9. Count 2 was dismissed on the government's motion. The court granted Melbert's motion for judgment of acq uittal after the government's case in chief on counts 1, 3 and 4. The jury found Melbert not guilty on2

count 5, but the jury found Melbert guilty on count 6 (possession with the intent to distribute powered cocaine on or about October 4, 1994), coun t 7 (possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, crack, on or about October 4, 1994), and count 9 (using and carrying a firearm in connection with a drug trafficking offense). Melbert timely appeals.
On appeal, Melbert moved to file a supplemental brief in order to assert his right to the benefits of the decision of the United
States Supreme Court in Bailey v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), which was decided during appeal. The government concedes
that the facts and circumstances involved in Melbert's conviction
under count 9 for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) would not support a determination that he used or carried a weapon during a drug offense as now defined in Bailey

. Accordingly, we reverse
Melbert's conviction on count 9 and vacate his se ntence thereon. We deny the motion to file a supplemental brief as moot.
Melbert also claims error on the part of the trial court in failing to grant his motion to suppress certain evide nce and various sentencing errors. We have carefully reviewed the briefs,
the reply briefs, the record excerpts and relevant portions of the
record. We are satisfied that the findings of fact and conclusions
of law made by the trial court at the suppression hearing were not clearly erroneous and that the findings of relevant conduct and quantities of drugs involved were amply supported by the evidence
before th e trial court. Accordingly, Melbert's convictions and
sentence on counts 6 and 7 are affirmed.3

As to count 9, conviction REVERSED and sentence VACATED. As to counts 6 and 7, conviction and sentence AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21.1SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT   1. Molecular Devices GmbH, a corporation organized under the Laws of Germany.   2. Molecular Devices Ltd., a corporation organized under the Laws of England and Wales.   3. Skatron Instruments AS, a corporation organized under the Laws of Norway.   4. Nihon Molecular Devices, a corporation organized under the Laws of Japan.   5. Cytion S.A., a corporation organized under the Laws of Switzerland.   6. LJL BioSystems, Ltd., a corporation organized under the Laws of England and Wales.   7. Universal Imaging Corporation, a corporation organized under the Laws of Pennsylvania.   8. Astros Acquisition Sub II, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the Laws of theState of California.   9. Molecular Devices Korea, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the Laws of theRepublic of Korea.   10. Axon Research Pty. Ltd., a corporation organized under the Laws of the State of Victoria,Australia.   11. Molecular Devices Instrumentacao Cientifica do Brasil Ltda, a corporation organized under theLaws of Brazil.   12. MDC Shanghai Representative Office, registered in Shanghai, China.   13. Molecular Devices Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of Hong Kong.   14. Molecular Devices International, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State ofDelaware.
January 24, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.R. AND A.J.R., CHILDREN

NO. 14-12-01017-CV 

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on October 16, 2012. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 10.33

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                          SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN
                                       OF
                         STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.


         SECOND AMENDMENT, to the Supplemental Retirement Plan of Stanley
Furniture Company, Inc. by Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. (the "Company").
The Company maintains the Supplemental Retirement Plan, effective as of
January 1, 1990, and amended and restated as of January 1, 1993 (the "Plan").

         WHEREAS, the Company, pursuant to Section 7.01 of the Plan, now wishes
to amend the Plan to provide that retired participants who return to service
with the Company on less than a full-time basis will continue to receive benefit
payments under the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended effective January 1, 2002, as
follows:

         1. Section 2.03 of the Plan is amended in its entirety as follows:

         2.03 Restoration of Retired Participants to Service - Notwithstanding
anything contained herein to the contrary, if a former Participant who has
received or who is receiving a retirement benefit under this Article II again
becomes an employee who is scheduled to work one thousand (1,000) Hours of
Service or more during any Plan Year, any retirement benefit he is receiving
shall cease upon his reemployment. On his subsequent retirement, the
supplemental retirement benefit payable under this Article II shall be resumed
at the same amount previously payable and he shall receive the Actuarial
Equivalent value of the monthly supplemental retirement benefit payable during
the suspension of benefits.

         2. In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and
confirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to the
Plan to be executed as of February 13, 2003.

                                                 STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.



                                                 By:/s/Jeffrey R. Scheffer
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Jeffrey R. Scheffer
                                                    President and Chief
                                                    Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

CLIFTON B. WOODS, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:18-cv-99 

District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

DECISION AND ENTRY 

 This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint 

Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner. (Doc. #10). The parties stipulate that the 

findings of the ALJ including the non-disability finding below should be vacated and this 

matter remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the 

Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon receipt of this Order, the Appeals Council 

will remand the matter to an Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings. During 

said proceedings, the Administrative Law Judge will reweigh the medical opinions and 

reevaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 

1. The parties’ Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner 

(Doc. #10) is ACCEPTED; 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s 

favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 
2

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security 

Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 

405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision 

and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and 

4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Date: September 28, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 29, 2014

p0922

Order 

Clerk

September 29, 2014

148721 & (18)(20)(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148721

COA: 318658

Oakland CC: 2005-202583-FC

TERRENCE TERRELL MOORE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to file a brief exceeding 50 pages is DENIED as 

moot since the defendant’s brief complies with MCR 7.212(B). The application for leave 

to appeal the January 31, 2014 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by 

MCR 6.502(G). The motions for letter request review and for miscellaneous relief are 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 63 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 63

    Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 2019, as 
    ``Darwin Day'' and recognizing the importance of science in the 
                        betterment of humanity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 2019

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Murphy, and Mr. Whitehouse) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 2019, as 
    ``Darwin Day'' and recognizing the importance of science in the 
                        betterment of humanity.

Whereas Charles Darwin developed the theory of evolution by the mechanism of 
        natural selection, which, together with the monumental amount of 
        scientific evidence Charles Darwin compiled to support the theory, 
        provides humanity with a logical and intellectually compelling 
        explanation for the diversity of life on Earth;
Whereas the validity of the theory of evolution by natural selection developed 
        by Charles Darwin is further strongly supported by the modern 
        understanding of the science of genetics;
Whereas it has been the human curiosity and ingenuity exemplified by Charles 
        Darwin that has promoted new scientific discoveries that have helped 
        humanity solve many problems and improve living conditions;
Whereas the advancement of science must be protected from those unconcerned with 
        the adverse impacts of global warming and climate change;
Whereas the teaching of creationism in some public schools compromises the 
        scientific and academic integrity of the education systems of the United 
        States;
Whereas Charles Darwin is a worthy symbol of scientific advancement on which to 
        focus and around which to build a global celebration of science and 
        humanity intended to promote a common bond among all the people of the 
        Earth; and
Whereas February 12, 2019, is the anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin in 
        1809 and would be an appropriate date to designate as ``Darwin Day'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Darwin Day''; and
            (2) recognizes Charles Darwin as a worthy symbol on which 
        to celebrate the achievements of reason, science, and the 
        advancement of human knowledge.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                       367
<INVENTORY>                                     21,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,633
<PP&E>                                          25,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,148
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,535
<SALES>                                         54,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,248
<CGS>                                           40,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,083
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,078<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>EXTRAORDINARY LOSS FROM DEBT REFINANCING
</FN>
        

</TABLE>