alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          79,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  248,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     78,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               471,776
<PP&E>                                         750,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                 737,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 559,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,356,048
<BONDS>                                      1,015,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     22,172
<COMMON>                                         6,144
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,992,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   559,251
<SALES>                                        213,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               230,748
<CGS>                                           47,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  391,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (79,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (79,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (79,906)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20405

ALVY T McQUEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; NANCY K JOHNSON; SUSIE M WONG; MARK W HUGHES, Defendants-Appellees. *****************************************************************’ No. 98-20451 ALVY T McQUEEN, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; SUSIE M WONG; MARK W HUGHES; NANCY K JOHNSON, Magistrate Judge Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-95-H-1453 & H-91-CV-329)

March 4, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The South Financial Group, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-79668, 333-31948, 333-53170, 333-99159, 333-102877, 333-103763,
333-104947, 333-109578, 333-111805, 333-177409, and 333-117508) on Form S-8 and
the registration statements (Nos. 333-112404 and 333-120366) on Form S-3 of The
South Financial Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 9, 2005, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of The South Financial Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2004, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear
in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of The South Financial
Group, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Greenville, South Carolina
March 14, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2265

JAMES P. MAYER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (7:06-cv-00054-FL)

Submitted: April 30, 2007 Decided: May 22, 2007

Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James P. Mayer, Appellant Pro Se. Marian Ashley Harder, SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James P. Mayer appeals the district court’s order

granting the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss Mayer’s action for

disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income

payments. Mayer’s application was dismissed because a previous

final decision concerning Mayer’s entitlement to benefits on the

same facts and on the same issues had been entered. See 20 C.F.R.

§ 404.957(c) (2005). A district court has no jurisdiction to

review the Commissioner’s res judicata decisions unless the

claimant has raised a colorable claim of a constitutional

violation. Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977). Mayer has

raised no such claim. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. See Mayer v. Barnhart, No. 7:06-cv-00054-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov.

15, 2006). We also deny Mayer’s motion for monthly benefit

payments.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
As the regional chamber of commerce in Rochester, we think every day about ways to promote job creation and security for our region. We encourage you to carefully balance the factors that impact sensible fuel economy standards, including consumer choice, affordability and the economic concerns that weigh on our nation's fragil?ecovery

-t:' 

### ri-- i - Sincerely,


### &IJ
Sandra A. Parker President & CEO 150 State Street Rochester, NY 14614-1308 Phone: (585) 244-1800 Fax: (585) 263-3679 www.RochesterBusinessAlliance.com 

## V READING 

# Rochester' Bus/n essA I/lance The Reqional Chamber of Commerce

The Honorable Ray LaHood Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Dear Secretary LaHood and Administrator Jackson: 

### Vf ' e Honorable Lisa Jackson Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004 Chair of the Board Thomas F. Judson, Jr. The Pike Company

V/ce Chair and Secreta'y Susan R. Holliday Rochester Business Journal

Treasurer David H. Klein Excellus BlueCross BlueShield

President and Chief Executive Officer Sandra A. Parker Today jobs, the economy and energy security are on the minds of every American.

Rochester Business Alliance is focused on proactive policies to address these critical issues and grow Rochester toward a more secure future. Transportation is a critical component of our economic vitality and given that your agencies are now developing national fuel economy standards for 2017-2025, I wanted to share my views.

Safe, eL9cient and reliable transportation impacts each individual, family and business in our :egion. Jobs in Greater Rochester are closely tied to cost effective transportation. With the recent increase in gas prices and turmoil in the Middle East, reducing fuel use and dependence on foreign oil are on all our minds. We support your efforts to improve fuel economy by laying out a long-term program, but encourage you to carefully consider a balanced and thoughtful approach.

We encourage NHTSA and EPA to adopt a single, national fuel economy standard that considers America's needs for increased fuel economy while preserving the choices for families and businesses to meet their transportation needs without sacrificing affordability, safety, orjobs. NHTSA and EPA have already set strong standards for 2012-2016 that raise the fleet average by 40% to 35 miles per gallon. Looking forward, technology improvements should continue to support increases in fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards. However, we recognize that overreaching regulations can place a significant cost burden on individuals, families and businesses in Rochester.

Rochester Bus/ness A//lance is the regional chamber of commerce. RBA provides information, advocacy, human resource services and networking to he/p employers grow.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

PAUL JOE CRAMER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No.: 2:18-cv-51 

vs. JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH 

 Magistrate Judge Deavers 

STATE OF OHIO, 

 Defendant. 

 ORDER 

On January 24, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Report and 

Recommendation on Initial Screen granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and 

recommending dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may 

be granted. (See Order and Report and Recommendation, Doc. 2). The parties were advised of 

their right to object to the Order and Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of 

their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Order and Report and 

Recommendation. 

 The Order and Report and Recommendation on Initial Screen is hereby ADOPTED and 

AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s 

claims are hereby DISMISSED pursuant to Section 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim upon 

which relief may be granted. 

 
2 

The Clerk shall remove Document 2 from the Court’s pending motions list and terminate 

this case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

§ 11.81 What information must I include in my petition for an exemption? 

You must include the following information in your petition for an exemption and submit it to FAA as soon as 

you know you need an exemption. 

(a) Your name and mailing address and, if you wish, other contact information such as a fax number, 

telephone number, or e-mail address; 

(b) The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek an exemption; 

(c) The extent of relief you seek, and the reason you seek the relief; 

(d) The reasons why granting your request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the 

public as a whole; 

(e) The reasons why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would 

provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek the exemption; 

(f) A summary we can publish in the Federal Register, stating: 

(1) The rule from which you seek the exemption; and 

(2) A brief description of the nature of the exemption you seek; 

(g) Any additional information, views or arguments available to support your request; and 

(h) If you want to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside the United States, the reason why you 

need to do so.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Donald R. Sellers, Chief Executive Officer of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
on my knowledge:

       (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
       certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
       with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

       (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Registrant.

Date: October 31, 2003                                /s/ Donald R. Sellers
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                         Donald R. Sellers
                                                      Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
will be retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Grafe, Jerome (DEP) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject 

donsegreilly@comcast.net 

Monday, September 24, 2012 10:07 PM 

Grafe, Jerome (DEP); Fichter, Katherine (DOT) 

Red to Blue Connector 

Please support the Red to Blue connector plans to help relieve traffic in my family's neighborhood. There was 

a promise to do this year's ago when the Ted Williams Tunnel was completed. 

Sincerely, 

Donna Segreti Reilly 

30 Cottage Park Road 

Winthrop, MA 02152-2907
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Amended Yearly Report On Form 10-KSB of ABSS
Corp for the Year Ended December 31, 2003, I, Alan Lew, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of ABSS, Corp. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Amended Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
          31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Amended Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB
          for the year ended December 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ABSS,
          Corp.

Dated:  April 14, 2004


ABSS, CORP.


By: /s/ Alan Lew
---------------------------
Alan Lew
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
H. R. 4547 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 119 Station 

Road in Cheyney, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Captain Luther H. Smith, U.S. Army 

Air Forces Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN LUTHER H. SMITH, U.S. ARMY AIR FORCES POST 

OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 119 Station Road in Cheyney, Pennsylvania, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Captain Luther H. Smith, 

U.S. Army Air Forces Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Captain Luther H. Smith, U.S. Army Air Forces Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

OHIO ALUMINUM CHEMICAL, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Case No. 1:18-cr-30 

Judge Susan J. Dlott 

ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY PLEA 

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of Acceptance of Guilty Plea 

(Doc. 9). On May 30, 2018, Defendant appeared with counsel before Magistrate Judge J. 

Gregory Wehrman for rearraignment. After Magistrate Judge Wehrman informed Defendant of 

its right to rearraignment in the presence of a United States District Judge, Defendant—through 

its authorized representative, Vice President Richard Rosen—consented to rearraignment before 

a United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant, through counsel, further consented to the 

Magistrate Judge conducting the Rule 11 hearing and making a recommendation concerning plea 

acceptance. The consent was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent and occurred with counsel’s 

advice. The United States also consented. 

At the conclusion of those proceedings, the Magistrate Judge recommended that this 

Court accept the guilty plea of Ohio Aluminum Chemical, LLC. The Defendant has waived 

Indictment (Doc. 8). 

Having received no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, this Court 

ACCEPTS the guilty plea of Ohio Aluminum Chemical, LLC and adjudges it guilty of Count 1 

of the Information as charged. The Court will consider the Plea Agreement filed in this case 

Case: 1:18-cr-00030-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 07/18/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 24
2 

along with the Presentence Investigation Report and any other sentencing memoranda filed by 

either party prior to sentencing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Date July 18, 2018 __s/Susan J. Dlott__________ 

 Judge Susan J. Dlott 

 United States District Court 

Case: 1:18-cr-00030-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 07/18/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 25
Case: 3:18-cr-00039-WHR Doc #: 4 Filed: 03/22/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      13,296,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  802,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 25,750,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,099,881
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,850,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,003,756
<BONDS>                                     20,146,489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,700,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,850,355
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,074,592
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,946,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,375,587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,752,999
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.2


CHANGE ORDER FORM
Credit to EPC Contract Value for TSA Work


	
		
	PROJECT NAME:  Sabine Pass LNG Stage 3 Liquefaction Facility


OWNER:  Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC


CONTRACTOR:  Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc.


DATE OF AGREEMENT: May 4, 2015
	CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: CO-00002


DATE OF CHANGE ORDER: September 17, 2015
 








The Agreement between the Parties listed above is changed as follows: (attach additional documentation if necessary) 


1.  This Change Order is a credit to the EPC contract value for home office professional services completed under the Bechtel and SPL, L.L.C. Technical Services Agreement, dated May 9, 2012.


2.  Schedule C-1 (Milestone Payment Schedule) of Attachment C of the Agreement will be amended by including the milestone(s) listed in Exhibit A of this Change Order.




Adjustment to Contract Price
	
				
	The original Contract Price was
	$
	2,987,000,000
	


	Net change by previously authorized Change Orders (00001)
	$
	(35,865,556
	)

	The Contract Price prior to this Change Order was
	$
	2,951,134,444
	


	The Contract Price will be decreased by this Change Order in the amount of
	$
	(2,832,019
	)

	The new Contract Price including this Change Order will be
	$
	2,948,302,425
	







Adjustment to dates in Project Schedule
The following dates are modified (list all dates modified; insert N/A if no dates modified): 




Adjustment to other Changed Criteria (insert N/A if no changes or impact; attach additional documentation if necessary) N/A


Adjustment to Payment Schedule: Yes.  See Exhibit A 


Adjustment to Minimum Acceptance Criteria: N/A


Adjustment to Performance Guarantees: N/A


Adjustment to Design Basis: N/A


Other adjustments to liability or obligation of Contractor or Owner under the Agreement: 




Select either A or B:
[A] This Change Order shall constitute a full and final settlement and accord and satisfaction of all effects of the change reflected in this Change Order upon the Changed Criteria and shall be deemed to compensate Contractor fully for such change.  Initials:  /s/ JJ Contractor   /s/ EL Owner


[B] This Change Order shall not constitute a full and final settlement and accord and satisfaction of all effects of the change 









reflected in this Change Order upon the Changed Criteria and shall not be deemed to compensate Contractor fully for such change.  Initials:  ____ Contractor  ____ Owner


Upon execution of this Change Order by Owner and Contractor, the above-referenced change shall become a valid and binding part of the original Agreement without exception or qualification, unless noted in this Change Order.  Except as modified by this and any previously issued Change Orders, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This Change Order is executed by each of the Parties’ duly authorized representatives.




	
			
	/s/ Ed Lehotsky
	 
	/s/ JT Jackson

	Owner
	 
	Contractor

	Ed Lehotsky
	 
	JT Jackson

	Name
	 
	Name

	VP LNG Projects
	 
	Sr. Vice President

	Title
	 
	Title

	9/29/2015
	 
	9-18-15

	Date of Signing
	 
	Date of Signing