alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Jonathan Lewis            |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| Jonathan      Lewis, M.D., Ph.D.   |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer       |   |
| (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |

| /s/ Richard E. Bagley                        |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard      E. Bagley                            |   |
| President      and Chief Financial Officer        |   |
| (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
DISTRICT FOUR COMMUNITY MEETING 

June 05,2006 

690 P.M. TO 9:30 P.M. 

District Four Service Center 

Meeting called by: Chairperson - Daniel Nih 

Type of meeting: Regular Community Meeting 

AGENDA TOPICS: 

I. CALL TO ORDER: 

11. INVOCATION: 

III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 

IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 15,2006 

V. REPORTS: 

A. Diabetes Prevention Progmm - Monica Martinez 

B. D.E.Q. - Daniel Blair 

C. Executive Report - Executive representative 

D. Coordinator's Report - Christopher Mendoza 

E. Council Report - Council Representative 

VI. OLD BUSINESS: 

A. Special meeting with Committees on Bylaws 

VII. NEW BUSINESS: 

k Financial Request - Jessica M. Nish 

B. Refund request from building usage 

Verna Perez and Irwin Lewis 

VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS: 

Next Community Meeting, June 19,2006 @ 6:30 p.m. 

Next Recreation Meeting, June 07,2006 @ 6:30 p.m. 

Next Executive Meeting, June 12,2006 @ 6:30 p.m. 

Special Community meeting June 10,2006 @ 9:00 a.m. 

XI. ADJOURNMENT: 
DISTRICT ONE 

BLACKWATER COMMUNITY 

MEETING 

6:00 P.M. 

JUNE 05,2006 

I. INVOCATION 

11. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 

111. MINUTES: MAY 15,2006 

N. PRESENTATIONS: (15 minutes including questions and answers) 

A. DEQ- Air Quality Ordinances, Janet Travis 

B. Administration Update- Councilmen Wally Jones and Lester Antone 

C. Pima Maricopa Irrigation Project- Henrietta Lopez 

V. NEW BUSINESS 

A. 

B. 

C. 

VI. OLD BUSINESS 

A. Community Chairman Vacancy 

B. 

C. 

VII. REPORTS 

A. Youth CouncilB. TreasurerC. DirectorsD. CoordinatorE. Project AdministratorF. BECG. RecreationH. Housing1. CACJ. EnrollmentK. SeniorsL. CouncilM. C-TERCN. Blackwater Community School0. DPWP. Planning &ZoningVIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Next Community Meeting May 19,2006 

M. ADJOURNMENT
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marshall Sterman, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 20, 2006

| /s/ Marshall Sterman                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Marshall Sterman      President and Chief Executive Officer      (Principal Executive Officer) and      Acting Chief Financial Officer      (Principal Financial Officer and      Principal Accounting Officer) |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

MORGAN PERRY, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

KRIEGER BEARD SERVICES, LLC, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

 Case No. 3:17-cv-161 

 Judge Thomas M. Rose 

 

AUNSHAWN HENDERSON, on behalf of 

himself and all others similarly situated, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

KRIEGER BEARD SERVICES, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

 Case No. 3:18-cv-6 

 Judge Thomas M. Rose 

 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

ENTRY AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES PURSUANT TO 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 42(a) 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), the Court may consolidate actions 

before it that involve a common question of law or fact. In Perry v. Krieger Beard Services, LLC, 

et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-161, and Henderson v. Krieger Beard Services, LLC, Case No. 3:18-cv6, the Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Krieger Beard Services, LLC (“Krieger Beard”) employed 

them as satellite installation technicians—although Krieger Beard classified them as independent 

contractors—and failed to pay them the overtime compensation to which they were entitled. The 

legal questions raised by these allegations are nearly identical in each case. The Perry case raises 

Case: 3:18-cv-00006-TMR Doc #: 24 Filed: 07/02/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 179
2 

additional questions because it names additional Defendants, but the similarities between the cases 

far outnumber the differences. Consolidation of the two cases is therefore warranted under Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 42. Accordingly, Case Nos. 3:17-cv-161 and 3:18-cv-6 are 

CONSOLIDATED for all purposes and further filings in both cases shall be made in Case No. 

3:17-cv-161. 

The Court recently granted conditional certification of a class of technicians in both Perry 

and Henderson. Now that the cases are consolidated, the Court orders the Plaintiffs in each case 

to work together to draft a single class definition and notice to putative opt-in plaintiffs consistent 

with the Court’s Orders granting conditional certification. Once Plaintiffs have agreed upon a 

notice, they are ordered to provide it to Defendants for their review and approval. If the parties 

are unable to agree upon a notice, they must promptly bring any issues to the Court’s attention. 

The parties should not raise issues that have already been ruled upon in either of the cases, 

however, and are strongly encouraged to work out any issues without the Court’s intervention. 

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, July 2, 2018. 

s/Thomas M. Rose 

 ________________________________ 

THOMAS M. ROSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 3:18-cv-00006-TMR Doc #: 24 Filed: 07/02/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 180
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 698 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 698

 Designating September 2020 as ``National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2020

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Ms. Baldwin) submitted the following 
               resolution; which considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating September 2020 as ``National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas approximately 294,000 individuals in the United States live with spinal 
        cord injuries, which cost society billions of dollars in health care 
        costs and lost wages;
Whereas there are approximately 17,810 new spinal cord injuries in the United 
        States each year;
Whereas more than 42,000 individuals with spinal cord injuries are veterans;
Whereas motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries;
Whereas nearly half of all spinal cord injuries to individuals 30 years of age 
        or younger occur as a result of motor vehicle accidents;
Whereas the average remaining years of life for individuals living with spinal 
        cord injuries has not improved significantly since the 1980s;
Whereas there is an urgent need to develop new neuroprotection, pharmacological, 
        and regeneration treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; 
        and
Whereas increased education and investment in research are key factors in 
        improving outcomes for individuals living with spinal cord injuries, 
        enhancing the quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injuries, 
        and ultimately curing paralysis: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 2020 as ``National Spinal Cord 
        Injury Awareness Month'';
            (2) supports the goals and ideals of National Spinal Cord 
        Injury Awareness Month;
            (3) continues to support research to find better 
        treatments, therapies, and a cure for spinal cord injuries;
            (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies that offer 
        promise and hope to individuals living with paralysis; and
            (5) commends the dedication of national, regional, and 
        local organizations, researchers, doctors, volunteers, and 
        people across the United States who are working to improve the 
        quality of life of individuals living with spinal cord injuries 
        and their families.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

For The Southern District of Ohio 

Western Division at Dayton 

United States of America 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18cr70 

 v. Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Davon Lundy 

 Defendant, 

 ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

 FOR CONSIDERATION OF EARLY RELEASE (Doc. 21) 

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to a letter submitted by Defendant which the 

Court will treat as a Motion for Consideration of Early Release (Doc. 21). 

 Defendant requests this consideration based upon concern about the COVID-19 

pandemic and his health and well-being during his incarceration. This Court would conclude the 

Motion is pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), asking that consideration be given to his 

release from confinement because of the recent outbreak of COVID-19 virus pandemic in the 

community at large and throughout Bureau of Prisons. Based upon the Defendant’s filing there is 

no indication that he has exhausted his BOP (Bureau of Prisons) remedies. 

Section 3582(c)(1)(A) expressly provides that the Court “may not modify a term of 

imprisonment” upon a motion brought by a defendant until “after the defendant has fully 

exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion 

on the defendant’s behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden 

of the defendant’s facility, whichever is earlier...” 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A) (emphasis added). 

Given the lack of any indication that the Defendant has fully exhausted his Bureau of Prisons 

remedies, and that he has not otherwise shown that either condition of this statutory exhaustion 

requirement has been fulfilled, the Court cannot grant this motion. Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 

Case: 3:18-cr-00070-TMR Doc #: 22 Filed: 06/02/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 68
1850, 1856-57, 195 L. Ed. 2d 117 (2016) (a court may not excuse exhaustion requirements 

mandated by statute because “mandatory exhaustion statutes ... establish mandatory exhaustion 

regimes, foreclosing judicial discretion”); see also United States v. Allen, Case No. 1:19-cr-98-

10, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66414 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2020) (denying defendant’s motion for 

compassionate release in context of COVID-19 pandemic because he failed to comply with the 

exhaustion and 30-day requirements of § 3582(c)(1)(A)); United States v. Alam, Case No. 15-

20351, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61588, at *6-7 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 8, 2020) (denying emergency 

motion for compassionate release, collecting cases, and concluding that “neither condition 

described in 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) is met, and that this failure to exhaust cannot be excused, 

even in light of the COVID-19 pandemic”). Therefore, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion 

for Consideration of Early Release (Doc. 21) without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: June 2, 2020 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 ___________________________________ 

 Judge Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Court 

Case: 3:18-cr-00070-TMR Doc #: 22 Filed: 06/02/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 69
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Friedhelm Blobel, Chief
Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                 
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Friedhelm Blobel, Ph.D.                                                                                     
|                  |  |  |  | Friedhelm Blobel, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

**ChiefExecutive Officer Certification**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection withAmendment No. 1 to the Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the purpose of complyingwith Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code.

 

R. Jack DeCrane, the Chief Executive Officer and Richard J. Kaplan, theChief Financial Officer of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc., each certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

2.                                     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings,Inc.

 
| Date:  October 9, 2003 |                                             |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                             |
|                   | /s/  R. JACK DECRANE                        |   |
|                   | R. Jack  DeCrane                                 |
|                   | Chief  Executive Officer                         |
|                   |                                             |
|                   |                                             |
|                   | /s/  RICHARD J. KAPLAN                      |   |
|                   | Richard J.  Kaplan                               |
|                   | Senior Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                   | Secretary  and Treasurer                         |
|                        |                                                  |  |  |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2016

No. 04-16-00566-CR

EX PARTE GEORGE RODRIGUEZ, JR.,

Appellant

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-03-11476-CR

The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez. Justice

Appellant filed his brief on October 24, 2016, and the State’s brief was due on November 

14, 2016. Because the State did not file an appellee’s brief or a motion for extension of time, this 

court issued an order on November 21, 2016 in which we ordered the State to file an appellee’s 

brief, if it desired to do so, and a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief no 

later than ten days from the date of our order (December 1, 2016). Our order cautioned the State 

that if no appellee’s brief or response was filed within ten days, the appeal would be set for 

submission without a State’s brief. Neither the brief nor a response was filed.

After the appeal came at issue, the State filed a motion on December 9, 2016 asking for 

an extension of time in which to file the State’s brief. In the motion, the State did not explain 

why it failed to respond to our November 21, 2016 order. Accordingly, on December 14, 2016, 

this court issued an order denying the State’s motion and submitting this appeal without benefit 

of the State’s appellee’s brief.

Despite the State’s failure to respond to our November 21, 2106 order and the clear 

language of our December 14, 2016 order denying the motion for an extension of time and 

setting this appeal for submission, the State filed its appellee’s brief on December 21, 2016.

The State’s appellee’s brief is ORDERED stricken and will not be considered on appeal.
It is so ORDERED on December 29, 2016

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
TYPE:  EX-23.3

BUSINESS TRANSLATION SERVICES, INC.

EXHIBIT 23.3 Consent of Experts and Counsel

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
330 E. Warm Springs
Las Vegas, NV 89119
702.528.1984
425.928.2877 (efax)


November 7, 2000


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of November 7, 2000, on the Financial Statements of eCLIC, Inc. for the nine
months ending September 30, 2000, in any filings which are necessary now or
in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,


/s/ G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
--------------------------
Nevada License #2701

<PAGE>
#### People v Rodney Thomas,

No. 91007;

Court of Appeals No. 120513.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-156427 on Form S-8 of our reports dated September 10, 2010,relating to the consolidated financial statements of Kensey Nash Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”), and the effectiveness of Company’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Kensey Nash Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2010. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

September 10,2010
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOSHUA MELVIN NEGRON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2446

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee

County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge.

Robert P. Harris of Robert Harris Law Firm, 

Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Joshua Melvin Negron challenges the revocation of his probation and 

resulting sentence of twenty-four months in prison for the offense of fleeing or eluding a 

law enforcement officer with lights and sirens activated. We affirm without discussion 
- 2 -

the trial court's decision to revoke probation and remand only for entry of a second 

corrected revocation order.

The trial court entered a revocation order and a corrected revocation 

order. Negron argues, and the State acknowledges, that the corrected revocation order 

contains errors that require further correction. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court 

to enter a second corrected revocation order that omits the condition five violations that 

were never alleged or mentioned at the evidentiary hearing, includes the condition ten 

violation that the trial court found, and reflects that the violations were found after an 

evidentiary hearing. See Jones v. State, 221 So. 3d 736, 736 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) 

(remanding for entry of a revocation order conforming to the oral pronouncement of the 

condition violated); Hamilton v. State, 128 So. 3d 177, 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) 

(remanding to correct revocation order that incorrectly stated that the probationer 

admitted to the violation when the trial court had conducted a revocation hearing). 

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

LUCAS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.