alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 493 

To authorize testimony, documents, and representation in United States v. 

Stahlnecker. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2020 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER), submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony, documents, and representation in 

United States v. Stahlnecker. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Stahlnecker, Cr. No. 

19–394, pending in the United States District Court for 

the Central District of California, the prosecution has requested the production of testimony, and, if necessary, 

documents from Sarah Harms, an employee of the office 

of Senator Sherrod Brown, Leah Uhrig, a former employee of that office, and, Kylie Rutherford, an employee 

of the office of Senator Shelley Moore Capito; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former employees of the Senate with 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 493 ATS 

respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony 

relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore be it 

1 Resolved, That Sarah Harms and Leah Uhrig, cur2 rent and former employees, respectively, of Senator 

3 Brown’s office, and Kylie Rutherford, a current employee 

4 of Senator Capito’s office, and any other current or former 

5 employee of the Senators’ offices from whom relevant evi6 dence may be necessary, are authorized to testify and 

7 produce documents in the case of United States v. 

8 Stahlnecker, except concerning matters for which a privi9 lege should be asserted. 

10 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

11 represent any current or former employees of Senators 

12 Brown and Capito in connection with the production of 

13 evidence authorized in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Regulations to reduce volatile organic compound emissions from nonfumigant pesticide products

(DPR Regulation No. 12-001)

Enclosure 1

A copy of regulations resulting from the following sections from 3 CCR for 

inclusion in California’s SIP, including and limited to:

• Title 3 of the California Code of Regulations (3 CCR) section 

6452 pertaining to reduced VOC emissions field fumigation 

methods.

• 3 CCR section 6452.2 pertaining to volatile organic compound 

emission limits.

• 3 CCR section 6558 pertaining to recommendations for use of 

nonfumigants in the San Joaquin valley ozone nonattainment 

area. 

• 3 CCR section 6577 pertaining to sales of nonfumigants for use 

in the San Joaquin Valley ozone nonattainment area.

• 3 CCR section 6880 pertaining to criteria to designate low-VOC 

or high-VOC nonfumigant pesticide products.

• 3 CCR section 6881 pertaining to annual VOC emissions 

inventory report. 

• 3 CCR section 6883 pertaining to recommendation 

requirements in the San Joaquin Valley ozone nonattainment 

area.

• 3 CCR section 6884 pertaining to San Joaquin Valley ozone 

nonattainment area use prohibitions. 

• 3 CCR section 6886 pertaining to dealer responsibilities for the 

San Joaquin Valley Ozone nonattainment area.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**ChiefFinancial Officer Certification**

 

I, Richard J.Kaplan, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-Q of DeCrane AircraftHoldings, Inc.;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

Date: October 9, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/  RICHARD J. KAPLAN                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard J.  Kaplan                               |
|   | Senior Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|   | Secretary  and Treasurer                         |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Eltrax Systems, Inc. on Forms S-3 (No. 333-53965, 333-51003 and
333-37013) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-92337, 333-85107, 333-80501 and 333-26015) of
our report dated March 26, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Sulcus Hospitality Technologies, Corp. as of December 31, 1998,
and for each year in the two year period ended December 31, 1998, which report
is included in this Form 10-K.


Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 27, 2000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

V.

STEVEDORE CRAWFORD, JR.,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:18-cr-00075

JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Stevedore Crawford, Jr.'s Motion to Amend

his PresentenceInvestigation Report. (Docs. 165& 167.) Defendant asks the Court to amend his

PSR to reflect his history of drug use, so he can qualify for the Residential Drug Abuse Program

at FCI, Morgantown, where he is currently incarcerated. The Government has no objection to this

amendment, as it agrees Defendant has a history ofsubstance abuse.

The Court is weary of adding information to Defendant's PSR that may have negative

consequencesin the future. Therefore,the Court will not direct the United States ProbationOffice

to amend Defendant's PSR. The Court will, however, recommend that Defendant be placed in the

Residential DrugAbuse Program at FCI, Morgantown. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that

Defendant be admitted to the Residential Drug Abuse Program at FCI, Morgantown.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Algenon L. Marblev

ALGENON L. MARBLEY

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATED; March 2,2020
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12 (a)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.
                           AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                                                          YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                                       --------------------------------------------------------
(Dollar amounts in millions)                              1998        1997        1996        1995        1994 
                                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                                                    <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>     
Earnings from continuing operations ................   $  3,796    $  3,256    $  2,817    $  2,415    $  2,085
Provision for income taxes .........................      1,364       1,166       1,231       1,105         864
Minority interest ..................................        148         121         167         140         139
                                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Earnings before income taxes and minority interest .      5,308       4,543       4,215       3,660       3,088
                                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Fixed charges:
 Interest ..........................................      9,122       7,762       7,402       6,731       4,598
 One-third of rentals ..............................        296         245         182         175         156
                                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Total fixed charges ................................      9,418       8,007       7,584       6,906       4,754
                                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Less interest capitalized, net of amortization .....         88          52          41          21           9
                                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Earnings before income taxes and minority
 interest, plus fixed charges ......................   $ 14,638    $ 12,498    $ 11,758    $ 10,545    $  7,833
                                                       ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .................       1.55        1.56        1.55        1.53        1.65
                                                       ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4360 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26 (legislative day, MARCH 25), 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs blind rehabilitation center in Long Beach, California, as the 

‘‘Major Charles Robert Soltes, Jr., O.D. Department of 

Veterans Affairs Blind Rehabilitation Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4360 RFS

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 BLIND REHABILITATION CENTER, LONG 

3 BEACH, CALIFORNIA. 

4 The Department of Veterans Affairs blind rehabilita5 tion center in Long Beach, California, shall after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Major Charles Robert Soltes, Jr., O.D. Department 

8 of Veterans Affairs Blind Rehabilitation Center’’. Any ref9 erence to such blind rehabilitation center in any law, regu10 lation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

11 United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

12 ‘‘Major Charles Robert Soltes, Jr., O.D. Department of 

13 Veterans Affairs Blind Rehabilitation Center’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 25, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### W. F. EWTON, Chief of Driver Control Section, Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, Revenue Division *v.*Bernard J. BERG

79-181

587 S.W. 2d 26

Opinion delivered October 1, 1979

(Division II)

*Jack East III, Joseph Svohoda, Barry Coplin, H. Thomas Clark, Jr.,*by: *Timothy J. Leathers,*for appellant.

*Macorn, Moorhead & Green,*for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Following appellee, Bernard J. Berg, Jr. ’s forfeiture of a cash appearance bond in connection with a driving while intoxicated charge, appellant’s predecessor, Chief of the Driver Control Section, Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, Revenue Division, notified appellee that his driver’s license was being revoked for a period of three months pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 75-1029.4 (Supp. 1977), which provides:

> “In addition to the fines and penalties as now provided by law under the provisions of Section 3 [§ 75-1029] of Act 208 of 1953, *m*amended, for persons convicted of driving or [being] in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence ©f intoxicating liquor or drugs, additional sanctions shall be applied as hereinafter provided.

> *5711. (a) When a person has been convicted for driving, or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs, and such person has not been convicted of such offense for a period of three (3) years prior to the date of arrest on the charge which led to said conviction, such conviction shall constitute a first offense and the driving privilege of such person shall be suspended for not less than ninety (90) days. The court in which the conviction for first offense of operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs occurs may recommend that a restricted license be issued for the purpose of maintaining a livelihood or other dire needs of the licensee as may be determined by a Driver’s License Hearing Officer. The determination that restricted driving privileges are to be granted shall occur at an administrative hearing to be conducted by a Driver’s License Hearing Officer under provisions of existing statutory requirements for such hearings. The Hearing Officer conducting such hearing shall consider the total driving record of the person convicted for first offense of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs for the purpose of deciding if a restricted permit should be issued, and to determine the restrictions to be placed on such person’s driving privilege in the State of Arkansas.”

On petition of appellee, the trial court enjoined the action of appellant on the basis that the statute, *supra,*did not authorize appellant to revoke appellee’s license— *i.e.*the revocation of the license was a duty imposed upon the courts of this State. We agree with the trial court.

Affirmed.

We agree. Harris, C.J., Holt and Purtle, JJ.
#### Joseph Campbell, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[771 NYS2d 893]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered December 17, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries, granted defendant City’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it was not filed within one year and 90 days of the accrual of plaintiff’s cause of action, as required by General Municipal Law § 50-i, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It does not avail plaintiff that the action was commenced within six months of the dismissal of another action involving the same occurrence. The six-month toll in CPLR 205 (a) does not apply when the statutory time bar to the commencement of the second action is not a statute of limitations but a condition precedent to suit *(Yonkers Contr. Co. v Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp.,*93 NY2d 375, 378 [1999]). General Municipal Law § 50-i falls into the latter category *(cf.*93 NY2d at 378-379, construing McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 7107 [L 1950, ch 301, § 7]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4611 

To provide dollars to the classroom. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Mr. PITTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To provide dollars to the classroom. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dollars to the Class5 room Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE BY STATES OF FEDERAL 

7 FUNDS PROVIDED FOR ELEMENTARY AND 

8 SECONDARY EDUCATION. 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not less 

10 than 95 percent of any Federal funds made available to 

11 a State or State educational agency by the Secretary of 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4611 IH

1 Education for a purpose relating to elementary or sec2 ondary education shall be used for— 

3 (1) academic purposes; and 

4 (2) classroom, or classroom-related, purposes or 

5 at the school level. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Case: 3:18-mj-00159-SLO Doc #: 5 Filed: 04/04/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 28
Case: 3:17-cv-00334-TMR Doc #: 14-16 Filed: 04/16/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 300
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Global Perspective Portfolio L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      19,244,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,942<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,576,290<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,576,290<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               384,594<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               577,396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (192,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (192,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (192,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include receivable from DWR of $220,935 and interest
receivable of $70,007.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $941,751, and net option premiums of $99,460.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $266,656, accrued management
fees of $51,408, and accrued administrative expenses of $13,054.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $439,886, net
change in unrealized of $(262,947) and interest income of $207,655.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

United States of America

vs. Case Number: 1:18cr34

Izmir Koch

Minutes: Trial to the Bench - Day 3

Closing Argument of counsel held.

Matter taken under submission.

Judge: Susan J. Dlott

Courtroom Deputy: William Miller

Court Reporter: Julie Wolfer, Official

Date: November 15, 2018

Case: 1:18-cr-00034-SJD Doc #: 47 Filed: 11/15/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 141
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.01

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-70613) of Rocky Mountain Internet, Inc. and in the related
prospectus of our report dated March 26, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998
of Rocky Mountain Internet, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 30, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB of
American Community Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March
31, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

                                     AMERICAN COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.

Date: April 28, 2003             By: /s/   Randy P. Helton
                                     -------------------------------------------

                                     Randy P. Helton
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 28, 2003             By: /s/   Dan R. Ellis, Jr.
                                     -------------------------------------------

                                     Dan R. Ellis, Jr.
                                     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                     Officer