alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4415 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the President to determine that certain individuals are unlawful enemy combatants subject 

to trial by military commissions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2010 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan (for herself and Mr. KING of New York) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

President to determine that certain individuals are unlawful enemy combatants subject to trial by military 

commissions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Terrorist Detention 

5 and Prosecution Act of 2010’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4415 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF PRESIDENT TO DETERMINE CER2 TAIN INDIVIDUALS ARE UNLAWFUL ENEMY 

3 COMBATANTS FOR PURPOSES OF LAWS RE4 LATING TO MILITARY COMMISSIONS. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY.—Section 948a(7) of title 10, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

10 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(D) the President determines— 

14 ‘‘(i) is closely associated with or has 

15 provided material support to al Qaeda or 

16 any other organization dedicated to com17 mitting acts of terrorism against the 

18 United States; 

19 ‘‘(ii) has taken up or conspired to 

20 take up arms on behalf of al Qaeda; and 

21 ‘‘(iii) has committed or conspired to 

22 commit acts of terrorism in the United 

23 States or against American citizens or tar24 gets, regardless of the location of the indi25 vidual’s capture.’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4415 IH

1 (b) DETENTION.—The President may authorize the 

2 detention for military purposes of any individual who is 

3 an unlawful enemy combatant (as that term is defined in 

4 section 948a(7) of title 10, United States Code) until the 

5 President determines that the individual is no longer a 

6 threat to the United States or its allies. 

7 (c) CHANGE OF TERMINOLOGY TO ‘‘UNLAWFUL

8 ENEMY COMBATANT’’.—Title 10, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘unprivileged enemy belligerent’’ 

11 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘unlawful enemy 

12 combatant’’; and 

13 (2) by striking ‘‘unprivileged enemy belliger14 ents’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘unlawful 

15 enemy combatants’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


October 8, 2015


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Dorsey Wright International
Momentum Trust, Series 1


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Dorsey Wright International Momentum Trust, Series 1 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on October 7, 2015, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in
the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the
party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-206697) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an
exhibit thereto.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Rich Robins v. Austen Perry Clinkenbeard and Jonathon G.

Clinkenbeard a/k/a Jon Clinkenbeard

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00 0 59

- CV

Trial court case number: 1107951

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

Date motion filed: February 25, 2021

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for en banc r econsideration is denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49. 7

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau,

Hightower, Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy, and Guerra.

Farris, J., not participating.

Date: April 15, 2021
Order filed September 3, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 20
- 00455
- CR

____________ THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant

V. SAMUEL ROBIN REYNOLDS , Appellee
On Appeal from Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No
. 14

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2312092



### O R D E R
The State’s brief was due August 17, 2020

. No brief or motion to extend time has been filed

. If the State does not file a brief by September 14, 2020 , we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. State v. Bissing , 169 S.W.3d 729 , 730 (Tex. App.

—

Waco 2005, no pet.); State v. Garza , 88 S.W.3d 353, 354

– 55 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2002, no pet.) (per curiam); State v. Palacios , 968 S.W.2d 467, 468 (Tex. Ap p.

—

Fort Worth 1998, no pet.) (per curiam).

PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4239 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the exception from 

the 10 percent penalty for early withdrawals from governmental plans 

for Federal and State qualified public safety employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2009 

Mr. MEEK of Florida (for himself and Mr. BRADY of Texas) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the exception from the 10 percent penalty for early withdrawals from governmental plans for Federal and State 

qualified public safety employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF EXCEPTION FROM 10 PER4 CENT EARLY WITHDRAWAL PENALTY FOR 

5 FEDERAL AND STATE PUBLIC SAFETY EM6 PLOYEES. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF RESTRICTION TO DEFINED BENEFIT

8 PLANS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 72(t)(10)(A) of the 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4239 IH

1 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

2 ‘‘which is a defined benefit plan’’. 

3 (b) INCLUSION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.—Sub4 paragraph (B) of section 72(t)(10) of such Code is amend5 ed to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED PUBLIC SAFETY EM7 PLOYEE.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 

8 term ‘qualified public safety employee’ means 

9 any employee of the Government of the United 

10 States, a State or political subdivision of a 

11 State, or any agency or instrumentality of any 

12 of the foregoing who provides police protection, 

13 firefighting services, or emergency medical serv14 ices for any area within the jurisdiction of the 

15 Government of the United States, or such State 

16 or political subdivision, as the case may be.’’. 

17 (c) APPLICATION TO ANNUITIES COMMENCING BE18 FORE THE PENSION PROTECTION ACT OF 2006.—Para19 graph (10) of section 72(t) is amended by adding at the 

20 end the following new subparagraph: 

21 ‘‘(C) TRANSITIONAL RULE FOR ANNU22 ITIES.—Paragraph (4) shall not apply to any 

23 modification to a series of substantially equal 

24 periodic payments which are made with respect 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4239 IH

1 to a qualified public safety employee if such se2 ries of payments commenced— 

3 ‘‘(i) before the date of the enactment 

4 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, and 

5 ‘‘(ii) after such qualified public safety 

6 employee’s separation from service after 

7 attainment of age 50.’’. 

8 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

10 subsections (a) and (b) shall apply to distributions 

11 made after the date of the enactment of the Pension 

12 Protection Act of 2006. 

13 (2) TRANSITIONAL RULE FOR ANNUITIES.—The 

14 amendment made by subsection (c) shall apply to 

15 modifications made after the date of the enactment 

16 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4543 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4543

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, as the ``Anthony J. 
                    Cortese Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTHONY J. CORTESE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Anthony J. Cortese Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Anthony J. 
Cortese Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4543

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, as the ``Anthony J. 
                    Cortese Post Office Building''.
```
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.24


Brian J. Driscoll Offer Letter Amendment


Dear Brian:
This letter (the “Agreement”) amends the employment offer letter from Diamond Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) to you dated May 4, 2012 (the “Offer Letter”), by amending Section 9(b) of your Offer Letter provisions under the heading of “Other Benefits.”
Section 9(b) of your Offer Letter is deleted and replaced with the following provision in its entirety.
(b)    Termination During Employment Term without Cause or Constructive Termination, or Nonrenewal by the Company, Not In Connection With a Change in Control; Death or Disability.  In the event of your Termination without Cause or Constructive Termination during the Employment Term, or your termination of employment by reason of a notice of nonrenewal given by the Company pursuant to Section 2, not in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in Section 9(c) below), or solely with respect to Section 9(b)(iv) and Section 9(b)(v) in the case of death or Disability, provided that (except with respect to the Accrued Compensation) you deliver to the Company a signed settlement agreement and general release of claims in favor of the Company in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Release”) and satisfy all conditions to make the Release effective within sixty (60) days following your termination of employment, then, you shall be entitled to the following:  
		
	i.
	Accrued Compensation;


		
	ii.
	Lump sum payment equal to twenty-four (24) months of your then current Base Salary;


		
	iii.
	Provided you were employed on the First Anniversary Date, then the vested portion of your Restricted Award will be calculated as if the Restricted Stock Award had been subject to quarterly vesting following the Employment Date;  


		
	iv.
	An amount equal to your annual bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, based upon the extent to which the performance objectives are achieved for such fiscal year, without any exercise of negative discretion (but not less than the amount guaranteed under Section 3 if the termination occurs in fiscal year 2012 or 2013), in any case prorated based upon the number of days that you were employed during such fiscal year, and paid when annual bonuses are otherwise paid to active employees; and


		
	v.
	Provided you validly elect to continue coverage under COBRA, a lump-sum payment equal to eighteen (18) months of your portion of premiums for you and your eligible dependents paid for continued health benefits.



1
        






Except in respect of Section 9(b) of your Offer Letter, we agree no other changes are made to your Offer Letter.
Please acknowledge your agreement with the amendment by signing below and returning the original to me for filing with the Company’s records. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
DIAMOND FOODS, INC.
By: /s/ Linda B. Segre     
Linda B. Segre 
Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy and People Officer


Acknowledged and Agreed:
/s/ Brian J. Driscoll     
Brian J. Driscoll 
Date: September 24, 2015

2
Office of the 

County Board 

Chris Gerlach 

Commissioner- Seventh District 

173 County Road 42 

Apple Valley, MN 55124 

Mobile: 651.338.7204 

chris.gerlach@co.dakota.mn.us 

Dakota County 

Administration Center 

1590 Highway 55 

Hastings, MN 55033 

Office: 651.438.441 I 

Fax: 651.438.4405 

www.dakotacounty.us 

Pnnted on recycled paper 

with 30% post-consumer waste. 

AN EQUAL Of'f'ORTVf,.'ITY Ef·IPLOYER 

cV~ COUNTY 

April 23, 2015 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

US Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

Dear Secretaries Kerry and FoxxAs you're well aware, the aviation business is a crucial part of Minnesota's economy and 

we've relied on airlines and regular routes for well-paying jobs and transportation for 

business and pleasure. This is why I'm writing to urge you to act on a matter that could 

put our economy at risk: the unfair competitive advantage given to foreign airlines 

thanks to the massive subsidies provided by their governments. 

Specifically I'm referring to subsidies paid by Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) 

to their state airlines, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline. These carriers 

have received at least $42 billion in subsidies and other unfair benefits over the past 

decade, which allows them to offer artificially lower fares than their competitors. 

Without the same unfair advantages, U.S. airlines are losing ground on key routes- and 

that could mean job losses in Minnesota and across the country. 

The U.S. has Open Skies agreements in place and these practices by Qatar and UAE are 

not in keeping with the intent of those agreements. I urge you to take the necessary 

steps to open consultations with Qatar and the UAE on the matter and request a freeze 

on new capacity from the Gulf carriers to the U.S. while the consultations go forward. 

The massive foreign subsidies of these airlines are unfairly hurting the U.S. economy. 

The global marketplace must play by the rules and should compete on a level playing 

field. We need your help. 

Chris Gerlach 

County Commissioner 

Dakota County, MN
Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52 -- Employment Effects

Higgins, Cortney

to: RobertJ Wayland

03/10/2011 09:47 AM

Cc: Karen Thundiyil, Thomas Gillis, Tom Walton, Bill Maxwell

1 Attachment

Chapter 9economicimpactstoxicsruleRIA2-

24versionclean_CommentsUnderEO12866_03122011.docx

Hi Bob,

Attached you will find a markup to the employment effects section of the RIA. Please note that the

presentation in the preamble should mirror the final agreed to language in the RIA, or should simply

refer to the RIA (similar to what was done in the Boilers preamble). Please let me know if you have any

questions.

Regards,

Cortney

________________________________________________ Cortney Higgins

Policy Analyst

OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2083 EVA M. WRIGHT, Widow of Clarence M. Wright, Petitioner, versusDIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; SEA “B” MINING COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-976-BLA, 99-176-BLA) Submitted: February 20, 2001 Decided: June 18, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eva Wright, Petitioner Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, Sarah Marie Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Eva Wright seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’sdecision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Wright v. DOWCP , Nos. 99-976-BLA; 99-176-BLA. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-77566) and
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
33-77232) of Reunion Industries, Inc. of our report dated March 23, 1998
appearing on page F-2 of this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on
page S-1 of this Form 10-K.




/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
-----------------------------
Price Waterhouse LLP

Stanford, Connecticut
March 23, 1998
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Acorn Factor, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John A.
      Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.






**/s/** John
      A. Moore


John
      A.
      Moore


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      19, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4267 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4267

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend whistleblower 
 protections to a member of the Armed Forces who alerts Department of 
  Defense investigation or law enforcement organizations, a person or 
   organization in the member's chain of command, and certain other 
persons or entities about the potentially dangerous ideologically based 
threats or actions of another member against United States interests or 
                               security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2009

 Mr. Carter (for himself, Mr. Rogers of Kentucky, Mr. Wilson of South 
  Carolina, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Olson, Mr. Culberson, Ms. Granger, Mr. 
  McCaul, and Mr. Aderholt) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend whistleblower 
 protections to a member of the Armed Forces who alerts Department of 
  Defense investigation or law enforcement organizations, a person or 
   organization in the member's chain of command, and certain other 
persons or entities about the potentially dangerous ideologically based 
threats or actions of another member against United States interests or 
                               security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Whistleblower Protection 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND 
              PROHIBITION OF RETALIATORY PERSONNEL ACTIONS.

    Section 1034(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(C) Ideologically based threats or actions of another 
        member that the member providing the information reasonably 
        believes could be counterproductive or detrimental to United 
        States interests or security.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI 

DAVID DURHAM, Case No. 1:18-cv-91 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DETECTIVE JERRY NIFFENEGGER, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

Judge Matthew W. McFarland 

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz 

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 105) AND 

DENYING DEFENDANT HOLLOPETER'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 94) 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States 

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 105), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time 

for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said 

Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant 

Hollopeter's Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process (Doc. 94). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

By ~ vf,7Jv';]4! 

JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND 

Case: 1:18-cv-00091-MWM-KLL Doc #: 121 Filed: 03/03/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 693