alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.1(b)


                               STATE OF DELAWARE

                        OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

                             ----------------------

        I, EDWARD J. FREEL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
CORRECTION OF "BNC MORTGAGE, INC.", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE FIRST DAY OF
DECEMBER, A.D. 1998, AT 9 O'CLOCK A.M.










(SEAL)                                       /s/ EDWARD J. FREEL
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Edward J. Freel, Secretary of State


                                             AUTHENTICATION: 9584373

                                             DATE: 02-18-99
<PAGE>   2


                          CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF

                SERIES A JUNIOR PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK OF

                               BNC MORTGAGE, INC.

                             ----------------------


It is hereby certified that:

         1.  The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "corporation")
             is: BNC Mortgage, Inc.

         2.  The Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating
             Preferred Stock of the corporation, which was filed by the
             Secretary of State of Delaware on October 21, 1998, is hereby
             corrected.

         3.  The inaccuracy to be corrected in said instrument occurs in Section
             3(a) as follows:

             (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this Section 3 and
                 subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth,
                 each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder
                 thereof to 1,000 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of
                 the stockholders of the Corporation.

         4.  The portion of the instrument in corrected form is as follows:

             (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this Section 3 and
                 subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth,
                 each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder
                 thereof to 100 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the
                 stockholders of the Corporation.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Correction of Certificate of
Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the corporation
is executed on behalf of the corporation by its President and attested by its
Secretary this 24th day of November, 1998.


                                                    /s/ KELLY W. MONAHAN
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Kelly W. Monahan, President


Attest:

/s/ EVAN R. BUCKLEY
----------------------------------
Evan R. Buckley, Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
JENNIFER INLOW, Case No. 1:17-cv-163
Plaintiff, Barrett, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.

vs.
COMMISSIONER OF REPORT AND
SOCIAL SECURITY, RECOMMENDATION
Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of
Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Doe. 15).
The parties have stipulated and petitioned the Court to award attorney fees in the amount of
$5,750.00 and costs in the amount of $400.00 in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all
claims plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. The parties have stipulated that
the award will satisfy all of plaintiff's claims for fees, costs and expenses under 28 U.S.C. §
2412 in this case. The parties acknowledge that any fees and expenses paid belong to plaintiff
and not her attorney and can be offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the
United States under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010).

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT the parties’ joint stipulation for an
award of attorney fees and expenses (Doc. 15) be GRANTED and that plaintiff be awarded

attorney fees and costs in the amount of $6,150.00.

Date: F/RBIS Bin A hone

Karen L. Litkovitz
United States Magistrate Judge



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

JENNIFER INLOW, Case No. 1:17-cv-163

Plaintiff, Barrett, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.

vs.
COMMISSIONER OF REPORT AND
SOCIAL SECURITY, RECOMMENDATION

Defendant..

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES REGARDING THE FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO R&R
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of

the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the
proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on
timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected
to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report
and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral
hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such
portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the
assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections
WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in
accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140

(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

1.      Molecular Devices GmbH, a corporation organized under the Laws of
        Germany.*

2.      Molecular Devices Ltd., a corporation organized under the Laws of
        England and Wales.*

3.      Molecular Devices Skatron, a corporation organized under the Laws of
        Norway.*

4.      Nihon Molecular Devices, a corporation organized under the Laws of
        Japan.*

5.      LJL BioSystems, a corporation organized under the Laws of Delaware.*

6.      LJL BioSystems, Ltd., a corporation organized under the Laws of England
        and Wales.*
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

DAVID ROBINSON, 

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:17-cv-403 

- vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, 

 : 

 Respondent. 

ORDER TO FILE HABEAS CORPUS PETITION IN REQUIRED 

FORM 

 

 This case is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge upon transfer from Magistrate 

Judge Sharon L. Ovington upon her determination that Mr. Robinson’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) 

seeks relief that this Court can grant only pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 which authorizes federal 

courts to consider allegations that a state court conviction and sentence violate the United States 

Constitution. 

 In order to begin to process Mr. Robinson’s case, the Court needs the information 

required by the standard form of petition for writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, the Clerk is 

ordered to furnish Mr. Robinson with the standard form and he is ordered to complete it and file 

it with this Court not later than January 5, 2018. 

December 8, 2017. 

 s/ Michael R. Merz

 United States Magistrate Judge
Case: 1:18-cv-00024-SJD-KLL Doc #: 2 Filed: 02/01/18 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 47
Case: 1:18-cv-00024-SJD-KLL Doc #: 2 Filed: 02/01/18 Page: 2 of 7 PAGEID #: 48
Case: 1:18-cv-00024-SJD-KLL Doc #: 2 Filed: 02/01/18 Page: 3 of 7 PAGEID #: 49
Case: 1:18-cv-00024-SJD-KLL Doc #: 2 Filed: 02/01/18 Page: 4 of 7 PAGEID #: 50
Case: 1:18-cv-00024-SJD-KLL Doc #: 2 Filed: 02/01/18 Page: 5 of 7 PAGEID #: 51
Case: 1:18-cv-00024-SJD-KLL Doc #: 2 Filed: 02/01/18 Page: 6 of 7 PAGEID #: 52
Case: 1:18-cv-00024-SJD-KLL Doc #: 2 Filed: 02/01/18 Page: 7 of 7 PAGEID #: 53
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4523 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to apply the ban 

on contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals to domestic corporations whose shareholders include any foreign principals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2010 

Mr. PERRIELLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

apply the ban on contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals to domestic corporations whose shareholders include any foreign principals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Our Democracy 

5 From Foreign Influence Act of 2010’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4523 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF BAN ON CONTRIBUTIONS AND EX2 PENDITURES BY FOREIGN NATIONALS TO DO3 MESTIC CORPORATIONS WITH FOREIGN 

4 SHAREHOLDERS. 

5 Section 319(b) of the Federal Election Campaign Act 

6 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441e(b)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

8 (1); 

9 (2) by striking the period at the end of para10 graph (2) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(3) a corporation (other than a foreign prin14 cipal, as so defined) whose shareholders include one 

15 or more foreign principals.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
L.PrestonBryant.Jr.SecretaryofNaturalResourcesCOMMONWEALTHofVIRGINIADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYStreetaddress:629EastMainStreet,Richmond,Virginia23219Mailingaddress:P.O.Box1105,Richmond,Virginia23218TDD(804)698-4021www.deq.virginia.govRECELVEDAUG2fkibt(%M)DavidK,PaylorDirector(804)698-40001-800-592-5482AUG252008Ms.JudithM.Katz,DirectorAirProtectionDivision(3APOO)U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,RegionIII1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,Pennsylvania19103-2029Reference:RECEIVEDsnOpacitySourceSurveillanceMethodsDearMs.Katz:Pursuanttotherequirementsof§110oftheCleanAirAct,weareofficiallyrequestingapprovalofarevisiontotheCommonwealthofVirginiaStateImplementationPlanadoptedbytheStateAirPollutionControlBoardonOctober10,2007inaccordancewiththerequirementsof§10.1-1308oftheVirginiaAirPollutionControlLawand40CFRPart51(RequirementsforPreparation,Adoption,andSubmittalofImplementationPlans).Thisrevisionconsistsofamendmentstotheregulations(9VAC5-40-20A3and9VAC5-50-20A3)containingproceduresusedtoimplementsourcesurveillancemeasures.Theseprovisionswereamendedtobeconsistentwith§10.1-1307.3BtotheCodeofVirginia,whichprovidesauthorityforthedirectortopursueenforcementactionforaviolationofopacityrequirementsorlimitsbasedon(i)visualobservationsconductedaccordingtoEPAmethods,(ii)informationfromcertifiedcontinuousopacitymonitors,or(iii)othermethodsapprovedbyEPA.Enclosedarethefollowing:1.RegulationrevisionF07.2.Certificationofpublicparticipationactivitiesandcompliancewithstateadministrativeprocedures.3.Recordofhearingandsummaryoftestimony.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsorneedadditionalinformation,pleaseletusknow.DKP\RAM\kgsTEMPLATES\SIP-REG\RBGOOSIP\MISC\F07-SIP.DOCEnclosuresDavidK.Paylor
EXHIBIT 23.1
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 Nos. 333-86155, 333-86159, 333-45288, 333-63036, 333-91996,333-106698, and 333-117133; and Form S-4 No. 333-114934) ofMolecular Devices Corporation of our reports dated March 11,2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Molecular Devices Corporation, Molecular DevicesCorporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of Molecular DevicesCorporation, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2004.
   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP  Palo Alto, California  March 11, 2005
Case: 3:17-mj-00505-PBS Doc #: 9 Filed: 01/18/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

SARA ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY, 

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:18-cv-55

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. 

Bowman

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO

THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION (Doc. 16)

This case is before the Court on the parties’ joint stipulation (the “Joint 

Stipulation”) for an award of attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (the 

“EAJA”). (Doc. 16). Upon careful consideration, the Court concludes that the parties’

Joint Stipulation should be and is hereby GRANTED in its entirety. Accordingly:

1. Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $1526.25 under the EAJA.

This award will fully satisfy any and all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs, and

expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 that may be payable in this case.

2. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and not her attorney, and can be offset to satisfy

any pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States under Astrue v. Ratliff,

560 U.S. 586 (2010). If counsel for the parties can verify that Plaintiff owes no

pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant shall direct that the award be made

payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by

Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

12/22/2020 s/Timothy S. Black

Case: 1:18-cv-00055-TSB-SKB Doc #: 17 Filed: 12/22/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 676
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,577
<PP&E>                                         336,859
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 738,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,795
<BONDS>                                        259,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           297
<OTHER-SE>                                     227,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   738,984
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               428,514
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  360,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               109,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (63,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,816)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,833)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,514)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.40)


</TABLE>
Whitehead v. State, No. 11-05-00179-CR, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 10772 (Tex. 1

App.—Eastland Dec. 14, 2006) (not designated for publication).

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-234-07

BUFORD GLEN WHITEHEAD, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O P I N I O N

The jury found Buford Glen Whitehead guilty of the third degree felony offense of

bail jumping and failure to appear. After finding that Whitehead had two prior felony

convictions, one for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and one for aggravated

kidnaping, the jury sentenced Whitehead to a term of life imprisonment. 

Whitehead appealed. He alleged that his life sentence constituted cruel and unusual 1
WHITEHEAD—2

 Id. at *1-2. 2

 Id. at *1, 3. 3

 Id. at *2-6. 4

punishment in violation of the United States and Texas Constitutions. He also claimed that 2

the evidence was factually insufficient to support the jury’s finding that he did not have a

reasonable excuse for failing to appear as required by the terms of his release on bond.3

After Whitehead was convicted of the felony offense of possession of methamphetamine, the

trial judge released him on bond pending sentencing so that Whitehead could spend time with

his dying father. The Eastland Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment in an

unpublished opinion.4

Whitehead petitioned for review, and we granted review to determined whether the

court of appeals erred in upholding his sentence and finding that the evidence was factually

sufficient to support the jury’s finding that Whitehead’s excuse for his failure to appear was

not reasonable. 

Having examined the record and briefs, we conclude that our decision to grant review

was improvident. We therefore dismiss Whitehead’s petition as improvidently granted.

DATE DELIVERED: April 30, 2008

DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Jean
      Perrotti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated:
                Date: June 4, 2008
            /s/
                Jean PerrottiName:
                Jean PerrottiTitle:
                Chief Financial OfficerAnd
                Principle Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                        PERKINS FAMILY RESTAURANTS, L.P.
                      COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME PER UNIT
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        1995         1994          1993
                                      ---------    ---------    ---------
<S>                                   <C>          <C>          <C>
Weighted Average Units Outstanding       10,246       10,263       10,242

Equivalent Restricted Units Based on
  Average Market Price for Period            23           12           32
                                      ---------    ---------    ---------

Weighted Average Equivalent Units        10,269       10,275       10,274
                                      =========    =========    =========

Net Income as Reported                $   9,796    $  12,008    $  12,602

Less: 1% General Partner's Interest          98          120          126
                                      ---------    ---------    ---------

Net Income Applicable to Units        $   9,698    $  11,888    $  12,476
                                      =========    =========    =========

Net Income Per Unit                   $    0.94    $    1.16    $    1.21
                                      =========    =========    =========
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00889]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Designation of Database for Treasury's Working System Under the 
Do Not Pay Initiative

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget.

ACTION: Notice of designation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 (PIIA) 
authorizes the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to designate 
databases for inclusion in Treasury's Working System under the Do Not 
Pay (DNP) Initiative. PIIA further requires OMB to provide public 
notice and opportunity for comment prior to designating additional 
databases. In fulfillment of this requirement, on October 12, 2021, OMB 
published a Notice of Proposed Designation (86 FR 56726) for the 
National Association of Public Health Statistics and Information 
Systems (NAPHSIS) Electronic Verification of Vital Events (EVVE) Facts 
of Death (FOD) System. OMB received no comments on this designation. 
Effective immediately, OMB designates the National Association of 
Public Health Statistics and Information Systems (NAPHSIS) Electronic 
Verification of Vital Events (EVVE) Facts of Death (FOD) System.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regina Kearney at the OMB Office of 
Federal Financial Management at (202) 395-3993.

Shalanda Young,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-00889 Filed 1-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P