alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.49  2003 Executive Bonus Plan   Purpose  The purpose of the 2003 Executive Bonus Plan
is to incentivize executives to meet and exceed the Companys 2003 Operating
Plan.   Eligibility  All 16B officers, Vice President of Systems
Architecture Group, and Vice President of Advanced Technology Division, hired
on or before September 30, 2003.   Executive Bonus Pool  Thirty percent (30.0%) of FY 2003 net
operating income (earnings excluding interest income derived from any capital
raised after December 31, 2002, and non-operating net income) exceeding $0.1800
per share will be dedicated to the executive bonus pool.  The number of shares used in the calculation
will be the same as for the public EPS calculation.  There will be no cap on the size of the pool; net operating
income must reach a minimum of $0.1900 per share, otherwise the Executive Bonus
Pool will not be funded and no payouts will be authorized.  Bonus targets will not be for EPS purposes,
i.e., the pool allocation is made after calculation of EPS net of the pool
contribution.   Allocation  Bonus targets will allocated based on the
following factors:  Category
  
  FactorCEO
  
  
  0.5PRESIDENT
  
  
  0.4All Others
  
  
  0.25  Factors for executives hired after January
31, 2003 will be reduced on a pro-rata basis in accordance with accrued service
calculated on a seven (7) day per week calendar basis.  To calculate target allocations, the
executive bonus pool will be divided by the product of these factors times the
number of eligible executives in each category on the payout date.  For example, if net operating earnings were
$0.2000 per share with 70 million shares outstanding, the bonus pool would be
$420,000.00 (($0.2000 - $0.1800) * 70,000,000 * 30% = $420,000.00).  -1- 
    Assuming eligible executives on the bonus
payment date consist of one (1) CEO, one (1) PRESIDENT, and ten (10) others,
all of whom were hired on or before January 31, 2003, bonus targets would be as
follows:  Category
  
  
  Example Target
  
  TotalCEO (1)
  
  $61,765
  
  
  $61,765PRESIDENT (1)
  
  $49,412
  
  
  $49,412All Others (10)
  
  $30,882
  
  
  $308,823TOTAL
  
  
  
  
  $420,200    Administration  If indicated, payouts will be completed no
later than February 15, 2004.  Eligible
executive must be a regular employee in good standing on the payout approval
date in order to receive a payout.  In January 2004, the CEO will present
executive bonus recommendations to the Compensation Committee (Committee),
which will have the authority to alter the CEO recommendations.  Based on the performance and contribution
(achievement versus objectives, goals, and metrics; jointly determined by the
CEO and PRESIDENT) of each executive, CEO-recommended and Committee-approved
payouts may be higher or lower than bonus targets; however, the sum of all
payouts may not exceed the funded amount of the Executive Bonus Pool.  Payouts will be considered authorized upon
approval by the Committee.  Bonuses will
not be considered earned until approval by the Committee.   Executive:
  
  
  Date:CEO:
  
  
  Date:PRESIDENT:
  
  
  Date:CFO:
  
  
  Date:   -2-
**Exhibit
      23**





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-07621) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1995 Long-Term Stock
      Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74485)
      pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1998 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, in the
      Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123522) pertaining to the LCA-Vision
      Inc. 2001 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and in the Registration Statement
      (Form
      S-8 No. 333-135414) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 2006 Long-Term Stock
      Incentive Plan, of our reports dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements and schedule of LCA-Vision Inc., and the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of LCA-Vision Inc.,
      included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
      2007.




/s/
      Ernst
& Young LLP





Cincinnati,
      Ohio


February
      27, 2008
#### People v Schinzel,

No. 90913;

Court of Appeals No. 120448.
Moffett B. Roller

mroller@rollerbauer.com

Law Offices

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Washington Dulles International Airport

45005 Aviation Drive; Suite 200

Dulles, VA 20166

Phone: 202-331-3300 • Fax: 202-331-3322

Lee A. Bauer

lbauer@rollerbauer.com

August 15, 2012

Mr. Robert Finamore

Acting Chief, Foreign Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Result of Poll Relating to Application of

ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet, for an Exemption

Docket DOT-OST-2012-0140

Dear Mr. Finamore:

We have polled the U.S. carriers on the Service List that was attached to the Application

of ABC Aerolíneas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet, for an Exemption, that was filed in the above

docket on August 14, 2012. None of those carriers has any objection to DOT approval of the

Application. Interjet therefore requests expedited approval of the Application since Interjet has

an immediate need to initiate marketing and introduce service on at least three of the six routes

requested.

We are serving copies of this letter by email on all parties that were served with the

Application.

Respectfully submitted,

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Attorneys for

ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet

By: ___________________________

Moffett B. Roller

cc: Service List
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Ladon Smith, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 1:17cv570 

Warden, Chillicothe Correctional 

Institution, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Respondent. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on August 9, 2018 (Doc. 17). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file 

objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. 

Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report 

and Recommendation have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) of 

the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by 

the Magistrate Judge, the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 16) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett 

United States District Judge
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4365 

To limit the distribution of funds for campaign-related work under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, to reduce the deficit, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To limit the distribution of funds for campaign-related work 

under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 

2009, to reduce the deficit, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTIONS ON ARRA FUNDS AND CAM4 PAIGN-RELATED WORK. 

5 (a) LIMITATION ON USE OF ARRA FUNDS.—Any 

6 person or entity that received compensation for campaign7 related work during the 2008 election cycle shall not be 

8 eligible to receive, either directly or indirectly, any funds 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4365 IH

1 from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 

2 2009 (Public Law 111–5). 

3 (b) RETURN OF ARRA FUNDS TO REDUCE THE

4 DEFICIT.— 

5 (1) RETURN OF FUNDS.—Any person or entity 

6 that has received compensation for campaign-related 

7 work during the 2008 election cycle and who has re8 ceived funds, either directly or indirectly, from such 

9 Act shall return such funds to the Secretary of the 

10 Treasury, with interest. 

11 (2) DEFICIT REDUCTION.—The Secretary of 

12 the Treasury shall deposit in the General Fund of 

13 the Treasury any funds received under paragraph 

14 (1) and ensure that such funds so deposited are 

15 dedicated for the sole purpose of deficit reduction. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1
 
                   REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Reunion Energy Company and
Reunion Operating Company:
 
  We have audited the combined statement of assets and liabilities directly
attributable to oil and gas operations (See Note 1) of Reunion Energy Company
and Reunion Operating Company (both Delaware corporations and collectively
referred to as "the Company") as of December 31, 1995, and the related
combined statements of revenues and expenses and cash flows for the year then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
 
  The accompanying financial statements omit those assets and liabilities and
revenues and expenses of the Company that are not directly attributable to its
oil and gas operations. Therefore, these financial statements are not intended
to be a complete presentation of the Company's assets and liabilities and
revenues and expenses.
 
  We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
 
  In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the assets and liabilities directly attributable to
oil and gas operations of Reunion Energy Company and Reunion Operating Company
as of December 31, 1995, and their related revenues and expenses and cash
flows for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
 
                                          Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Houston, Texas
March 27, 1996
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION 

RICK E. NEWMAN : CASE NO. C-1-01-0067 

 Plaintiff : JUDGE HERMAN J. WEBER 

 -vs- : AMENDED NOTICE OF VIDEOTAPE 

 DEPOSITION OF PRAKASH 

THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE : GOYAL, M.D. 

COMPANY, et al. 

 : 

 Defendants 

* * * * * * * 

Please take notice Defendant, Mesa, Inc., through counsel, and pursuant to the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, will take the videotape deposition of Prakash Goyal, M.D., at 10192 

Springfield Pike, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215, on August 11, 2004 at 3:30 p.m., and continuing from 

day to day thereafter until completed. The deposition will be taken before a notary public for all 

purposes permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

 /s/ JOSEPH T. MORDINO__________ 

 JOHN C. SCOTT, #0029518 

 JOSEPH T. MORDINO, #0065001 

 Attorneys for Defendant, Mesa, Inc. 

 FAULKNER & TEPE, LLP 

 2200 Fourth & Vine Tower 

 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

 (513) 421-7500 

Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 107 Filed 06/10/2004 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 10, 2004, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: Beverly R. Storm, 600 Greenup Street, P.O. Box 472, Covington, KY 41012-0472 

and Scott R. Thomas, One Financial Way, Suite 312, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242. 

/s/ JOSEPH T. MORDINO____________ 

 JOSEPH T. MORDINO 

Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 107 Filed 06/10/2004 Page 2 of 2
#### D’Angelo v General Motors Corporation,

No. 90825.

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. MCR 7.302(F)(1). Court of Appeals No. 130032.
Exhibit N-1

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-39 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 3281
American Civil Liberties Union

Posted General Ledger Transactions

Document Number Effective Date Transaction Description GL Short Title Debit

CAD-03-22-18 3/20/2018 Clerk, Appellate Division Court Fee&Trans 5.00

CSCI-03-22-18 3/22/2018 Clerk of the Supreme Court of 

Illinois

Court Fee&Trans 15.00

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - La Quinta Inns Travel 125.49

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

AAA FULL TRANSPORTATION S

Travel 25.64

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

American Airlines

Travel 1,206.97

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

CATTLE BARON RESTAURANT

Travel 81.66

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

Delta

Travel 320.91

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

HEALTHY GOURMET

Travel 7.61

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

NEW YORK CITY TAXI

Travel 61.60

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

PLUM MARKET - 101

Travel 8.46

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

STARBUCKS C8 N DFW

Travel 8.43

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

T3 PUEBLO DEL TQULRIA#55

Travel 22.45

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

UBER

Travel 29.78

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

UTICA TAXI CENTER

Travel 54.35

CD415DCD54344B379802 4/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

GOGOAIR

Book/Subs/Inter 32.00

9FD414FAA4784EFAA32F 5/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - Plaintiff Meeting 

PANYNJ AIRTRAIN

Travel 5.00

5A1B5ACC789948E091ED 5/1/2018 Gabriel Arkles - HERTZ RENT A 

CAR ROS

Travel 67.36

2,077.71

Page: 1

Case: 2:18-cv-00272-MHW-CMV Doc #: 87-39 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 3282
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

NOTICXE, INC., : Case No. 3:18-cv-00056
f/k/a Exciton, Inc., B

: District Judge Walter H. Rice
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, . Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
vs.
OAKLEY, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.

DECISION AND ENTRY

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of
United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #22), to whom this case was
originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have
been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)
has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on December 13, 2018 (Doc. #22)
is ADOPTED in full; and

2; Plaintiff Noticxe, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Oakley, Inc.’s
Counterclaims for Conversion and Replevin (Doc. #18) is GRANTED.

7,
WOWRS

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
Case: 3:17-mj-00575-MJN Doc #: 11 Filed: 04/13/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 36
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 9, 2016

No. 04-15-00469-CV

CASH BIZ, LP, Redwood Financial, LLC, Cash Zone, LLC dba Cash Biz,

Appellants

v.

Hiawatha HENRY, Addie Harris, Montray Norris, and Roosevelt Coleman Jr., et al.,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-01545

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice1

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice1

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The court has considered the appellees’ motion for en banc reconsideration, and the 

motion is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of September, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 

1 Dissents to the denial of the motion for en banc reconsideration without requesting a response. See Tex.R. 

App.P.49.2.
```
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-32.2
<SEQUENCE>5
<FILENAME>hybridexhbit322-093004.txt
<DESCRIPTION>CERTIFICATION OF CFO PER SECTION 906
<TEXT>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

      The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 of Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc.(the "Company")
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                           	s/s MARK CLANCY
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                 Mark Clancy
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 November 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
```
Exhibit 10.2

 

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

K12 INC. AND NATHANIEL A. DAVIS

 




 

This First Amendment (“First Amendment”), dated as of September 2, 2015, to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 10, 2014 (the “Agreement”) is made between K12 Inc., a Delaware corporation (“K12”) and Nathaniel A. Davis (“Employee”).

 

WHEREAS, K12 and the Employee, with the approval of the Board of Directors of K12, have agreed to extend the date on which a Renewal Offer is required under the Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is amended and affirmed as follows:

 

1.              Section 4.6(a) of the Agreement is amended and restated as follows:

 

4.6                               Expiration of Contract Term.

 

(a)                                 For the purposes of the Agreement, Renewal Offer means a bona fide offer by K12 to enter into a new employment agreement with EMPLOYEE, on terms at least as favorable to EMPLOYEE as this Agreement, made to EMPLOYEE at least one (1) month before the expiration of this Agreement.

 

2.              All capitalized terms defined in this First Amendment shall have the same defined meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as of the date and year first written above.

 

	
 
    	
K12 Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/Andrew   H. Tisch
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Andrew H.   Tisch
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chairman,   Compensation Committee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/Nathaniel   A. Davis
    
	
 
    	
Nathaniel   A. Davis
    
	
 
    	
Chairman   and CEO
Exhibit 10.1

                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This Second Amendment to Employment  Agreement (this "Second Amendment") is
made and entered  into as of this 13th day of March,  2002,  by and between DATA
SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE  INC., a Delaware  corporation  (the  "Company"),  and GEORGE
MORGENSTERN (the "Executive").

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  and the  Executive  are  parties  to an  Employment
Agreement dated as of January 1, 1997 (the  "Agreement"),  the term of which was
extended to December 31, 2002 by the First  Amendment to  Employment  Agreement,
dated as of May 17,  2001,  made by the  Company and the  Executive  (the "First
Amendment"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to assure itself of the Executive's  continued
services  until December 31, 2003 before he considers an election to be retained
by the Company on a part-time  basis in an advisory and  consultative  capacity,
and the Executive is willing to continue to provide such services to the Company
on a full time basis until such date.

          NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual promises  hereinafter
set forth,  the parties hereto,  intending to be legally bound,  hereby agree as
follows:

     1.   Paragraphs 1(a), 1(b), 2(a)(2)(i) and 4(a) of the Agreement as amended
by the First  Amendment  are hereby  amended by deleting the  references  in the
First Amendment to "December 31, 2002" and  substituting  "December 31, 2003" in
its place.

     2.   Paragraph  1(c)(ii) of the Agreement as amended by the First Amendment
is hereby amended by deleting the reference in the First  Amendment to "December
31, 2006" and substituting "December 31, 2007" in its place.

     3.   Except as modified by this  Second  Amendment,  all other terms of the
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect without modification.

     4.   This Second Amendment may be executed in  counterparts,  each of which
shall  constitute an original and which  together  shall  constitute one and the
same agreement


                        [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]

                                                                               1
<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment,
as of the day and year first above written.


DATA SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE INC.


By: /s/ YACOV KAUFMAN
     ------------------------------------------------
      Yacov Kaufman, Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer


By: /s/ ROBERT L. KUHN
    -------------------------------------------------
      Robert L. Kuhn, On Behalf
      of the Board of Directors


/s/ GEORGE MORGENSTERN
-----------------------------------------------------
GEORGE MORGENSTERN


                                                                               2