alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 3:17-cr-00183-WHR Doc #: 56 Filed: 03/02/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 192
Order entered July 3, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00411 - CV PNC BANK, N.A., Appellant

V. RPCG - GP I, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judicial Di strict Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 19 - 01763



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s July 2, 2019 unopposed motion for a seven

- day extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than Ju ly 15, 2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 to be filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Code Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Code Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 that, to our knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

/S/ JOHN R.MILLESON                

John R. Milleson 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

/S/KATHLEEN J. CHAPPELL      

Kathleen J. Chappell 

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

Date: May 16, 2011
Exhibit
10.2 


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 1 


 


TO



 


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), dated October 2, 2015, is by and between Drone Aviation
Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation with an address 11651 Central Parkway #118, Jacksonville, FL 32224 (the “Company”),
and Daniyel Erdberg (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS,
the parties entered into an Employment Agreement on May 18, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS,
the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth below, with the understanding that all other provisions of the
Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged;


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:


1.Section
2 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


The
Employee shall serve as President of the Corporation, with such duties, responsibilities and authority as are commensurate and
consistent with his position, as may be, from time to time, assigned to him by the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”)
of the Corporation. The Employee shall report directly to the CEO. During the Term (as defined in Section 3), the Employee shall
devote all of his full business time and efforts to the performance of his duties hereunder unless otherwise authorized by the
Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the expenditure of reasonable amounts of time by the Employee for the making of passive
personal investments, the conduct of business affairs and charitable and professional activities shall be allowed, provided such
activities do not materially interfere with the services required to be rendered to the Corporation hereunder and do not violate
the restrictive covenants set forth in Section 9 below.


 


		2.	The
                                         terms and conditions of all other sections of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged
                                         and in full force and effect.



 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date first stated above.


[Signature
Page Follows]


 



    


     


    

[Signature
Page to the Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement]





 


	 	DRONE AVIATION HOLDING CORP.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Kendall W. Carpenter
	 	 	Name: Kendall W. Carpenter

Title: Chief Financial Officer


  


	 	DANIYEL ERDBERG
	 	 
	 	 	/s/
    DANIYEL ERDBERG


 











    2
#### Jerry L. HOYT *v.*Sally HOYT

5-5336

459 S. W. 2d 65

Opinion delivered October 26, 1970

*Curtis L. Ridgway, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Anderson & Slagle,*for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a divorce suit brought by the appellee, Sally Hoyt. The parties were married in 1955 and separated in 1969. In the trial court the appellee was granted a divorce on the ground of adultery (about which the testimony is uncontradicted). The appellee was awarded custody of the couple’s three children, aged 12, 10, and 7. By stipulation the parties agreed upon, and the chancellor approved, a division *267of their property. The only contested issue on appeal is the amount of alimony and child support to be paid to the appellee. The chancellor allowed Mrs. Hoyt $500 a month as alimony and $500 a month as child support. The appellant insists that those allowances are excessive and should be reduced to a total of $800 a month.

We have consistently recognized the chancellor’s wide discretion in such a matter. Proper consideration should be given to the financial condition of the parties and to their conduct. We disturb the chancellor’s decision only if we find an abuse of discretion. *Wiles*v. *Wiles,*246 Ark. 289, 437 S. W. 2d 792.

The appellant is a physician who began practicing in Hot Springs eight years before the case was tried. Despite his testimony that he and his wife had lived beyond their income, Dr. Hoyt admitted that during the eight years he had accumulated a net worth of more than $110,000, though he states that his mother furnished him with loans totaling $23,000. In 1969 the doctor’s net income, after taxes, was about $24,000. If personal exemptions and unfunded depreciation are added to that figure, it appears that Dr. Hoyt had about $32,000 of spendable income in that year.

Mrs. Hoyt will have to maintain herself and three sons. She testified that her total expenses, which she itemized in detail, amount to about $1,450 a month. The chancellor quite rightly pointed out that here, as in most such cases, there is not enough money to go around. When we compare the wife’s demonstrated needs with the husband’s available income, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s allowances. The decree must therefore be affirmed, with an attorney’s fee of $750 to the appellee for the services of her counsel in this court.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Melanie M. Lundquist, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 22, 2006



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|                                            
|/s/     Melanie M. Lundquist                
|Melanie M. Lundquist Chief Financial Officer
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4543 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, 

as the ‘‘Anthony J. Cortese Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4543 EH

1 SECTION 1. ANTHONY J. CORTESE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, 

4 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Anthony 

5 J. Cortese Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Anthony J. Cortese 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4543 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Jose, California, as the ‘‘Anthony J. Cortese al Service located at 4285 Payne Avenue in San
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 224-225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.

[[Page 225]]

    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question 
whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the 
BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than 
January 18, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Senior Vice 
President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9eddf1f3f3fbf0eaedb0ffeeeef2f7fdffeaf7f1f0eddef0e7b0f8ecfcb0f1ecf9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="65260a0808000b11164b041515090c0604110c0a0b16250b1c4b0317074b0a1702">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. AIB Group, p.l.c., Dublin, Ireland; to retain GANMAC Holdings 
(BVI) Limited, and thereby indirectly retain Goodbody Securities, Inc., 
both of Dublin, Ireland, and engage in securities brokerage activities 
pursuant to section 225.28(b)(7)(i) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 28, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-28462 Filed 1-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### People v Carter,

No. 90725;

Court of Appeals No. 122369.
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4505 

AN ACT 

To enable State homes to furnish nursing home care to 

parents any of whose children died while serving in the 

Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4505 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF STATE HOME CARE FOR PAR2 ENTS OF VETERANS WHO DIED WHILE SERV3 ING IN ARMED FORCES. 

4 In administering section 51.210(d) of title 38, Code 

5 of Federal Regulations, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

6 shall permit a State home to provide services to, in addi7 tion to non-veterans described in such subsection, a non8 veteran any of whose children died while serving in the 

9 Armed Forces. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 30, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4505 

AN ACT 

To enable State homes to furnish nursing home 

serving in the Armed Forces. care to parents any of whose children died while
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4467 

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions for 

the relief of victims of the January 12, 2010, earthquake in Haiti. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2010 

Mr. MEEK of Florida (for himself, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. RUSH, Ms. 

WATERS, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. MCMAHON, 

Ms. LEE of California, Mr. MACK, Mr. HONDA, Mr. ENGEL, Ms. 

CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, and Mr. 

CAPUANO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash 

contributions for the relief of victims of the January 

12, 2010, earthquake in Haiti. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR 

4 CHARITABLE CASH CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RE5 LIEF OF HAITIAN EARTHQUAKE VICTIMS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of section 170 of the 

7 Internal Revenue Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any 

8 contribution described in subsection (b) made during JanVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:01 Jan 20, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4467.IH H4467

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4467 IH

1 uary or February 2010 as if such contribution was made 

2 on December 31, 2009, and not in January or February 

3 2010. 

4 (b) CONTRIBUTION DESCRIBED.—A contribution is 

5 described in this subsection if such contribution is a cash 

6 contribution made for the relief of victims in areas af7 fected by the January 12, 2010, earthquake in Haiti for 

8 which a charitable contribution deduction is allowable 

9 under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2475 Rudeloff Rd. Seguin, TX 78155 Phone 830-379-9800 Fax 210-855-8030

May 14, 2012

To Whom It May Concern:

Veracity Aviation is hereby filing for an exemption to 14 CFR 11.61-11.101, formerly part 

135.1(a)(5) Veracity Aviation is requesting the 91.147 (Veracity Aviation) be covered under the 

same FAA antidrug and alcohol misuse prevention program that is administered for Veracity 

Aviation’s 135 operator, rather than being required to maintain a separate program for the 141 

Flight School. 

The reason for this exemption; there are only 3-4 people that fly under the 91.147. Because this 

is such a small department, the company does not believe having this group under a separate 

program warrants the additional cost and time to administer two separate programs. The 

program that covers the 135 operator ensures the same level of safety and meets the same 

requirements of the program required for the 91.147. I do not believe that having 91.147 

under the same program as the 135 operator will compromise safety in any way. In addition, 

we have not had any positive drug or alcohol tests in our program in the past five years (and 

beyond); therefore I do not believe allowing this exemption would put our program at risk. 

Please feel free to contact me at anytime with questions regarding this exemption request. 

Thank you for your time.

Regards,

Mary Lewis

Office Manager/Drug-Alcohol Program Manager/DER

Company Information:

2475 Rudeloff Rd.

Seguin, TX 78155

(830)379-9800

mary@veracityaviation.com

receive
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

138475 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138475 

 COA: 280429 

Wayne CC: 07-004113-01 

HAKEEM TERRELL SINGLETON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4047 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4047

To use historical averages to calculate the Federal Medical Assistance 
 Percentage for disaster affected States for purposes of the Medicaid 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 2009

  Mr. Cao (for himself, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. 
 Sessions, Mr. Mica, and Mr. Boustany) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To use historical averages to calculate the Federal Medical Assistance 
 Percentage for disaster affected States for purposes of the Medicaid 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FMAP CALCULATION FOR DISASTER-AFFECTED STATES.

    (a) In General.--With respect to a State, for purposes of 
calculating the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage for a State under 
section 1905(b) of the Social Security Act, the Secretary shall 
substitute the average historical per capita income for such State for 
a year in any instance for which the Secretary, without regard to this 
section, would use the per capita income for such State for such year 
if--
            (1) in such year, the per capita income for a State exceeds 
        the average historical per capita income by at least 8 percent; 
        and
            (2) during such year or any of the 2 previous years, a 
        major disaster was declared in such State by the President 
        under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
        Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).
    (b) Average Historical Per Capita Income Defined.--For purposes of 
this section, the term ``average historical per capita income'' means, 
with respect to a State, the average annual per capita income for the 
period beginning with the first year in which the Federal Medical 
Assistance Percentage was calculated for such State under section 
1905(b) of the Social Security Act and ending with the year prior to 
the year during which the average historical per capita income is 
applied under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.1
Amendment #1
To
Executive/Severance Agreement
 
This Amendment #1 to the ________ Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the date of later signature below, by and between Micron Technology, Inc. (“Company”) and ______ (“Officer”).
 
WHEREAS, the Agreement was entered into by and between the parties hereto and was effective as of _________________, and
 
WHEREAS, Officer may be asked to take a reduction in his base salary as a temporary cost savings and demonstration of commitment to the Company and;


WHEREAS, the Company wants to ensure that Officer would be entitled to his pre-reduction salary if his employment terminates before his base salary is restored;


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


		
	1.
	Exhibit 5(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety and restated as follows:




(i)     Base salary as of the date of the Officer’s Separation from Service paid bi-weekly on the Company’s normal payroll cycle as if the Officer had worked during the Transition Period, provided, however:


		
	(A)
	if the Officer or the Company terminated the Officer’s status as an officer of the Company but not as an employee prior to the date of the Officer’s Separation from Service, then the base salary payable pursuant to this subsection during the Transition Period shall be the greater of (1) the Officer’s base salary in effect immediately prior to the Officer’s loss of officer status or (2) the Officer’s base salary as of the date of the Officer’s Separation from Service; and




		
	(B)
	if as of the date of the Separation from Service the Officer’s base salary is subject to a temporary reduction in an effort to save costs, then the base salary payable pursuant to this subsection during the Transition Period shall be the Officer’s base salary immediately prior to such reduction.  




		
	2.
	In all other respects, the parties hereby ratify and reaffirm all other provisions of the Agreement.













[signature page to Amendment #1 to _______ Agreement]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment.
    
	
					
	MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
	 
	OFFICER

	By:
	 
	 
	By:
	 

	Name:
	 
	 
	Name:
	 

	Title:
	 
	 
	Title:
	 

	Date:
	 
	 
	Date: