alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 3, 2013
(the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2013-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.
The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive
Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from April 3, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                 |  | 
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 28, 2014
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it No. 06-2449 COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General; ROBERT MUELLER, Director of the FBI; ROSA EMILIA RODRIGUEZ-VÉLEZ, U.S. Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico; and LUIS S. FRATICELLI, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI in Puerto Rico, Defe ndant s, Ap pellees.

ERRATA The opinion of this court issued on June 15, 2007, should be amended as follows: On page 49, line 4, replace "note 16," with "note 15,".
DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

December 30, 2011 

Dennis McLerran 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 10 

1200 6th Avenue, Suite 900 (Mail Stop RA-140) 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Dear Mr. McLerran: 

As the Governor’s designee for the Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP), 

the Department of Environmental Conservation is withdrawing the November 13, 

2009 request for Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approval of SIP 

amendments. The 2009 request included revisions to the state’s regulations 

(portions of 18 AAC 52 and 18 AAC 50.030) for the motor vehicle emission 

Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Program and Anchorage Carbon Monoxide (CO) 

maintenance plan. 

Prior to EPA action on the 2009 request, the Department further revised the 

Anchorage CO maintenance plan and transmitted those revisions and request for 

approval to EPA in a letter dated September 29, 2010. The 2010 request 

supersedes the 2009 SIP revision request. The 2010 revisions were significant and 

will suspend the I/M program as an active control measure in the Anchorage CO 

maintenance area upon final approval of this SIP revision by EPA. 

We look forward to EPA’s action on the 2010 request. 

Sincerely, 

Larry Hartig 

Commissioner 

cc: Debra Suzuki, EPA Region 10 

 Claudia Vaupel, EPA Region 10 

Alice Edwards, DEC AQ 

Cindy Heil, DEC AQ/ANPMS 

SEAN PARNELL, GOVERNOR 

410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303 

Post Office Box 111800 

Juneau, Alaska 99811-1800 

Phone: 907-465-5066 

Fax: 907-465-5070 

www.dec.state.ak.us
IB 

Union Calendar No. 295 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4445 

[Report No. 111–515] 

To amend Public Law 95–232 to repeal a restriction on treating as Indian 

country certain lands held in trust for Indian pueblos in New Mexico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2010 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Mr. LUJA ́N, and Mr. TEAGUE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JUNE 28, 2010 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on January 13, 2010] 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4445 RH

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 95–232 to repeal a restriction on 

treating as Indian country certain lands held in trust 

for Indian pueblos in New Mexico. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4445 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian Pueblo Cultural 

5 Center Clarification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION ON TREATING AS INDIAN 

7 COUNTRY CERTAIN LANDS HELD IN TRUST 

8 FOR INDIAN PUEBLOS IN NEW MEXICO. 

9 Public Law 95–232 is amended in the first section in 

10 subsection (b) by striking ‘‘However, such property shall not 

11 be ‘Indian country’ as defined in section 1151 of title 18, 

12 United States Code.’’. 

13 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON GAMING. 

14 Public Law 95–232 is amended in the first section by 

15 adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(e) PROHIBITION ON GAMING.—Gaming, as defined 

17 and regulated by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 

18 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), shall be prohibited on land held in 

19 trust pursuant to subsection (b).’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 295 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4445 

[Report No. 111–515] 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 95–232 to repeal a restricheld in trust for Indian pueblos in New Mexico. tion on treating as Indian country certain lands 

JUNE 28, 2010 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00699]



[[Page 2444]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Mental Health Research in Low and Middle-Income 
Countries.
    Date: February 17, 2022.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Serena Chu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6000, 
MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-500-5829, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d8abbdaabdb6b9f6bbb0ad98b6b1b0f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0839582959e91de939885b09e9998de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Prevention of Perinatal Depression.
    Date: February 18, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Serena Chu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6000, 
MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-500-5829, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3b0a6b1a6ada2eda0abb683adaaabeda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="02716770676c632c616a77426c6b6a2c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 11, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00699 Filed 1-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          18,444
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                        83
<INVENTORY>                                         50
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,034
<PP&E>                                          41,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,567
<BONDS>                                          4,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,266
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,754
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,299
<INCOME-TAX>                                       470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     57
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12


</TABLE>
## NUMBER 13 - 1 4 - 00357 - C R COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE HERMAN LEE KINDRED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam 1
Relator, Herman Lee Kindred, proceeding pro se, filed a p etition for writ of
mandamus in the above cause on June 26 , 2014 . Through this original proceeding,
relator seeks to compel the trial court to provide relator with appointed appellate counsel and a copy of the appellate record for relator’s pending appeal in our cause number 13

-

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ” ); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

13

- 00526

- CR. Relator has previously sought this same relief by motion filed in his pending appeal. To be entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must show: (1) that he has no adequate remedy at law, and (2) that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act. In re State ex rel. Weeks , 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. procee ding). If the relator fails to meet both of these requirements, then the petition for writ of mandamus
should be denied. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud. Dist. C t . of App. at Texarkana , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). I t is relator’s burden to properly request and show entitlement to mandamus relief. Barnes v. State , 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.

– Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) ( “ Even a pro se applicant
for a writ of mandamus must show himself entitled to the extraordinary relief he seeks. ” ). The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met his burden to obtain
mandamus relief. See State ex rel. Young , 236 S. W.3d at 210. Relator has already sought and obtained an adequate remedy for the alleged harm through his pending appeal. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 30th day of June , 2014

.
Order entered October 31, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00717-CR

FRANCISCO JAMES HURTADO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-81421-2012

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20E0032. SHEILA DARLENE HARDESTY v. GEORGIA PROPERTY

SOLUTIONS 4 U, INC.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT’S Emergency Motion for Injunction

in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby DENIED as the court

lacks jurdisction. See OCGA § 44-7-56.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

March 09, 2020

03/09/2020
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6351

CHARLES A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY CANADY; MR. DUNN; JOHNSTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT NARCOTICS DIVISION,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

ADREN L. HARRIS,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:10-cv-00558-FL)

Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: June 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, 

MITCHELL LAW GROUP, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Williams appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Williams v. Canady, No. 5:10-cv-00558-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 

7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8, No. 333-65550) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and Options Granted Pursuant to Agreements of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-89828) pertaining to theregistration of 2,067,298 shares of Class A common stock, the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-97159) pertaining to the registration of 1,718,580 shares of Class A common stock and the Registration Statement (Form S-3,No. 333-101706) pertaining to the registration of 225,000 shares of Class A common stock of our report dated March 17, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/    BDOSeidman, LLP 

West Palm Beach, Florida 

March 31, 2006
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 06, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 06, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0167. LEANDO FORD v. DAL-TILE DISTRIBUTION, INC..

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration 

of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals 

Rule 13.

On September 14, 2016, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than September 23, 2016. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated(the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June  30,  2006 (the‘‘Report’’), I, Raymond P. Warrell, Jr.,M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                            |
|--|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

Date:    August  8,2006

|                                                                                     |  |  |        |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--------|
| /s/RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR.,M.D.*                                                    |  |  |   |
| Name:    Raymond P. Warrell, Jr.,M.D.                           |  |  |   |
| Title:       Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer |  |  |   |
|                                                                                     |

* A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by GentaIncorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Jerone McDougald, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:18cv135 

Jeremy Eaches, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendants. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on April 16, 2018 (Doc. 8. 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including 

notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report 

and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 

1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) of the 

Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the 

Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Erdos and Cool are DISMISSED

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). Case number 1:18-cv-135 is 

consolidated into case number 1:18-cv-93. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett 

United States District Judge
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD M. MORRIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3296 

[August 17, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312007CF000671A.

Richard M. Morris, Okeechobee, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.