alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1280

DAVID ALAN BEAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

CATHERINE EVA KEDDIE; KATHREN ELAINE KIBBE;

WILLIAM GEORGE KINER; MARY EVELYN SHIELDS; EVA

FRANCES CAIL,

Appellants,

and

LYNN HENDERSON BEAR; JAMES LEE SKEEN; PAULA

RAE SKEEN; JOSHUA TYLER SKEEN; CORI NICHOLE

SKEEN,

Plaintiffs,

KEITH A. MORRIS; ALICE D. CLINTON; TOMMY

ALEXANDER; LOIS JOHNSON; BETTY LOU SAUER;

PAULINE CART; CHARLES CART; SHELLEY JOHNSON;

ALLEN DODGE; SUSAN R. DODGE; GREGORY B.

SUMNER; ESTER SUMNER,

Parties in Interest,

versus

MICHAEL F. EASLEY; HAL D. LINGERFELT,

Defendants - Appellees,
2

and

JOHN D. WYDRA, JR.; ANGELA MARTINEZ; BOB

RIDGWAY; CARL HORN, III; DIANE K. VISCOVO; L.

A. SCOTT, JR.; MARY E. HUGHES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-500-3-P)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 22, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Alan Bear, Catherine Eva Keddie, Kathren Elaine Kibbe,

William George Kiner, Mary Evelyn Shields, Eva Frances Cail, Appellants Pro Se. Leonidas McNeil Chestnut, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; James Michael

Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of Defendants Michael F. Easley and Hal D.

Lingerfelt but allowing the case to proceed as to several other

Defendants. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541

(1949). Because the case is still pending in district court as to

various other defendants, the order here appealed is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### People v Marshall Thomas,

No. 90828;

Court of Appeals No. 115585.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We have issued our report dated March 3, 2006 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Verso Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in
the 2005 Annual Report of the Company to its shareholders and accompanying the
schedules included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
of said reports in the Registration Statements of Verso Technologies, Inc. on
Forms S-8, file numbers 333-74258, 333-74264, 333-59372, 333-92337, 333-85107,
333-80501, 333-26015, 333-124037 and 333-124038 and Forms S-3, file numbers
333-66292, 333-45028, 333-108613, 333-113759 and 333-123591.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 31, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Reproduction, Andrology, and 
Gynecology Study Section.
    Date: February 17, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute, of Child 
Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B 
Rockledge Drive, Room 2125B, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Assisted 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Derek J. McLean, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes 
of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2125B, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 443-5082, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2b6b7a0b7b9fcbfb1beb7b3bc92bcbbbafcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb9f9e899e90d59698979e9a95bb959293d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.865, 
Research for Mothers and Children, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00823 Filed 1-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of SyndicationNet.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),we
the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
     the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                By: /s/Wayne Hartke
                                   _________________________________
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                Dated:  November 17, 2003


                                By: /s/Cynthia White
                                   __________________________________
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                Dated:  November 17, 2003



<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4511 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4511

    To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit 
 corporations which employ or retain registered lobbyists from making 
 expenditures or disbursements for electioneering communications under 
                   such Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2010

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit 
 corporations which employ or retain registered lobbyists from making 
 expenditures or disbursements for electioneering communications under 
                   such Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Pick Your Poison 
Act of 2010''.
    (b) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Independent expenditures made in connection with 
        elections for public office, including those made by 
        corporations, give rise to corruption and the appearance of 
        corruption, as well as undue influence and access.
            (2) This corruption, and the appearance of this corruption, 
        threatens to cause the electorate to lose faith in our 
        democracy.

SEC. 2. BAN ON EXPENDITURES AND DISBURSEMENTS FOR ELECTIONEERING 
              COMMUNICATIONS BY CORPORATIONS EMPLOYING OR RETAINING 
              REGISTERED LOBBYISTS.

    Section 316 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441b) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Special Rule for Corporations Employing or Retaining 
Registered Lobbyists.--A corporation may not make any expenditure, or 
make any disbursement for an electioneering communication, if it 
employs or retains a registered lobbyist under the Lobbying Disclosure 
Act of 1995.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

ALBERT TROCHE, JR., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 61 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal and Application for Relief are DENIED.
#### Terral *v.*Bennett.

4-6033

144 S. W. 2d 722

Opinion delivered November 11, 1940.

*348
      *Arnett*& *Shaw,*for appellant.

*G. L. Grant*and *E. B. White,*for appellee.

Smith, J.

The questions discussed in appellant’s brief are such only as could be brought to our attention for decision by a bill of exceptions.

. A purported bill of exceptions appears in the record which was not presented to nor approved and signed by the presiding judge. It is stated by appellant, who is, himself, an attorney, that he had depended upon one of the attorneys who represents him in this appeal and has filed a brief in his behalf to attend to the presentation of the bill of exceptions to the presiding judge. But, even so, this does not dispense with the requirements of the law and the rules of this court that bills of exceptions must be presented to the presiding judge for approval within the time allowed by the trial court for that purpose. The purported bill of exceptions was never presented to the trial judge at any time.

There is no bill of exceptions by bystanders, nor was there occasion for one, as the trial judge did not fail or refuse to sign and approve the bill of exceptions appearing in the transcript. Sections 1546 and 1547, Pope’s Digest.

As no error appears upon the face of the record, the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Humphbeys and Mehafey, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anton J. Drescher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1.

this report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or  15(d) of the 1934 Act, and



2.

the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of  operations of the registrant.



By: /s/ Anton J. Drescher

------------------------------------

Name: Anton J. Drescher

Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

Date:August 14, 2008
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.30


Dave Colo Offer Letter Amendment




Dear Dave:
This letter (the “Agreement”) amends the employment offer letter from Diamond Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) to you dated November 21, 2012 (the “Offer Letter”), by replacing the severance provisions under the heading of “Other Benefits.”
The “Severance upon Termination without Cause” provisions under the heading of “Other Benefits” in your Offer Letter are deleted and replaced with the following provision.
Severance upon Termination without Cause: In the event the Company terminates your employment during your first three years of service, without Cause as defined below, you will be entitled to receive the following termination benefits:
		
	a.
	Payment of 170% of your annual base salary, based on your annual base salary on the date of termination;


		
	b.
	Provided you were employed on the first anniversary of your start date, then the vested portion of your Restricted Award will be calculated as if the Restricted Award had been subject to quarterly vesting following the Employment Date;


		
	c.
	Provided you validly elect to continue coverage under COBRA, a lump-sum payment equal to twelve (12) months of your portion of premiums for you and your eligible dependents paid for continued health benefits.


		
	d.
	“Cause” means a good faith determination, that any of the following has occurred: (a) your commission of a felony or an act constituting common law fraud, which has a material adverse effect on the business or affairs of the Company or its affiliates or stockholders; (b) your intentional or willful misconduct or refusal to follow the lawful instructions of your supervisor the Board; or (c) your intentional breach of the Company confidential information obligations, which has an adverse effect on the Company or its affiliates or stockholders or (d) your  material breach of this Agreement. For purposes of this definition, no act or failure to act shall be considered “intentional or willful” unless it is done, or omitted to be done, in bad faith without a reasonable belief that the action or omission is in the best interests of the Company.


Compensation payable to you in this letter is subject to recoupment pursuant to the Company’s compensation recoupment policy, if any, adopted by the Board or required by law during the term of your employment with the Company that is applicable generally to executive officers of the Company. Compensation is also subject to withholdings and all applicable taxes.

1
        




Except in respect of any severance benefits provided you under the Offer Letter, we agree no other changes are made to your Offer Letter.
Please acknowledge your agreement with the amendment by signing below and returning the original to me for filing with the Company’s records. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
DIAMOND FOODS, INC.
By: /s/ Linda B. Segre     
Linda B. Segre 
Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy and People Officer


Acknowledged and Agreed:
/s/ Dave Colo     
Dave Colo 
Date: September 25, 2015

2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



         CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Numbers 333-45288, 333-86155 and 333-86159) pertaining
to the LJL BioSystems, Inc. 1994 Equity Incentive Plan, the LJL BioSystems, Inc.
1997 Stock Plan, the LJL BioSystems, Inc. 1998 Directors' Stock Option Plan, the
1995 Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, the
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1994 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1997
Stock Plan and the 1998 Directors' Stock Option Plan of Molecular Devices
Corporation of our report dated January 25, 2000, except as to Note 11, which is
as of February 2, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of LJL BioSystems, Inc. and its subsidiary at December 31, 1999 and for
each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1999, which appears in
this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
March 27, 2001
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 1 6 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk September 1 6 , 2020

16 1 836 ( 69 )

PENNIE MARIE DAVIS,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 161836

v COA: 344203

Jackson CC: 16

- 000344

- CZ

JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

_________ ____________________ ________ _ /

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time

for filing her answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED

. The answer

will be accepted as timely filed if subm itted on or before September 22, 2020.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,221
<SECURITIES>                                    10,954
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (799)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,814
<PP&E>                                          11,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (6,327)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,984
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,170
<SALES>                                         33,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,225
<CGS>                                           19,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,161
<INCOME-TAX>                                       232
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                929
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       929
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

857 

TP 11-00553 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN EVANS, PETITIONER, 

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT. 

 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (EDWARD L. CHASSIN OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H.

Dadd, A.J.], entered March 11, 2011) to review a determination of

respondent. The determination found after a Tier III hearing that

petitioner had violated various inmate rules. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously

dismissed without costs as moot (see Matter of Free v Coombe, 234 AD2d

996).

Entered: September 30, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
Order entered June 3, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00482-CV

ISRAEL GONZALEZ, Appellant

V.

MCKINNEY DODGE INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-00441-2013

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s May 30, 2014 motion for an extension of time to file a brief. 

Appellant shall file his brief on or before June 30, 2014.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Giant Jr. Investments, Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Imran
Firoz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Imran Firoz
-------------------
Imran Firoz
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
July 19, 2004

                                       19
#### People v Hinkle,

No. 90880;

Court of Appeals No. 113187.