alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Served: May 30, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------

VISION AIRLINES, INC. -----------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On April 30, 2014, Vision Airlines, Inc. (“Vision”), a U.S. certificated air carrier,1 requested that 

the Department register the trade name “PEOPLExpress” for use in certain of its air transportation 

operations. 

Part 215 (14 CFR Part 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to 

use an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further 

states that the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly 

named air carriers of the proposed use of the name. In this case, we identified no similarly named 

air carriers.2 Vision states that in accordance with Part 257 (14 CFR Part 257) of the Department’s 

regulations, it will ensure that its aircraft will clearly state the name of the operating carrier. 

Since Vision has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of 

the trade name “PEOPLExpress” for immediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C., May 30, 2014.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

 

1 See Order 2007-4-14 issued on April 17, 2007, most recently reissued by Order 2009-7-14 on July 15, 2009.

2 People Express Airlines, Inc. is a company that had submitted an application in Docket DOT-OST-2012-0042 

requesting authority to engage in interstate scheduled passenger air transportation as a U.S. air carrier. On May 20, 

2014, People Express Airlines, Inc., withdrew its application.
Attachment A 

SERVICE LIST FOR VISION AIRLINES, INC.

 MR GERALD MURPHY

 CROWELL AND MORING LLP

 1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW

 WASHINGTON DC 20004

MR WILLIAM ACOR

VISION AIRLINES INC

2705 AIRPORT DRIVE

NORTH LAS VEGAS NV 89032

KIP SHOEMAKER

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

7181 AMIGO STREET

LAS VEGAS NV 89119

MR WILLIAM DUSOLD

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE INSPECTOR

WASHINGTON FSDO-27

13873 PARK CENTER ROAD, SUITE 475

HERNDON, VA 20171

MR MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MR PETER LYNCH 

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT 

FAA/AGC-300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

MR MARK ATWOOD

COZEN O’CONNOR

1627 EYE STREET NW

WASHINGTON DC 20006

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4573 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                            March 26 (legislative day, March 25), 2010.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
4573) entitled ``An Act to urge the Secretary of the Treasury to 
instruct the United States Executive Directors at the International 
Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, and 
other multilateral development institutions to use the voice, vote, and 
influence of the United States to cancel immediately and completely 
Haiti's debts to such institutions, and for other purposes.'', do pass 
with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)On page 3, line 4, after [provision] insert: , before February 1, 
2015,

(2)On page 3, lines 18 and 19, strike ``relief'' and all that follows 
through ``Haiti.'' and insert: relief and debt service relief for Haiti 
and, before February 1, 2015, to provide grants for Haiti.

(3)On page 4, line 7, after [Haiti's future] insert: and future 
generations

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 4573

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
#### Louis DUELMER v. Ray HAND

85-52

692 S.W.2d 601

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered July 1, 1985

*Barron, Coleman & Barket, P.A.,*by: *Thomas L. Barron,*for appellant.

*Randell J. Wright*and *Henry C. Morris,*for appellee.

John I. Purtle, Justice.

Among items not abstracted, which causes us to dismiss this appeal under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 9 (d) and (e), is the order, judgment or decree appealed from. The lower court’s decision is the heart of any appeal. The abstract does not reveal that there has been any final disposition of the merits of this case. A reading of the Rule 9 opinion written for the court by Justice Byrd and reported as *Bank of Ozark*v. *Isaacs,*263 Ark. 113, 563 S.W.2d 707 (1978) is most instructive. In addition to our own rules last published in the reports at 279 Ark. 497 (1983) and also published in volume 3 A of the Arkansas Statutes, several publishing firms offer updated rules for sale to the public.

Appeal dismissed.

George Rose Smith, J., not participating.
'; SERVED: August 19, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

THOMAS H. BRAY 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0621 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2103WP700039) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shail be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

-··· .. 

Attachment -·Service List 
·, 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Lisa J. Toscano, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel, A WP-7 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7110 

F~: 310-725-6816 

Thomas H. Bray, Respondent 

30382 U.S. Highway 60-89, #11 

Wickenburg, AZ 85390 

TEL: 901-226-0142 

E-MAIL: multigrainscpt@msn.com 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U,S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0621 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited coirrier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William J. McEntee, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                             |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 14, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ William J. McEntee, Jr.
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                             |  | William J. McEntee, Jr.                          
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                             |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case: 3:18-mj-00036-SLO Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/27/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 39
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1317

HARRIETTA GIBBONS GIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPITAL REALTY ASSOCIATION; MANAGER PROPERTYOWNER, WILLIE CREEK APARTMENTS; TENNENT HOLDING AGENT AND LEASING AFFILIATE STOCKHOLDERS; ZIMMERMAN, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-2136-2) Submitted: August 31, 2000 Decided: September 14, 2000 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harrietta Gibbons Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the order from which Gibbs appeals was filed on March 13, 2000, it was entered on the district court’s docket sheet on March 14, 2000. March 14, 2000, is therefore the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a); see also Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Harrietta Gibbons Gibbs appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and deny all pending motions. See Gibbs v. Capital Realty Ass’n , No. CA-99-2136-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2000). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
H. R. 4508 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION 

OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND 

THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to 

extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business 

Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109–316; 

120 Stat. 1742), as most recently amended by section 1 of Public 

Law 111–89 (123 Stat. 2975), is amended by striking ‘‘January 

31, 2010’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘April 30, 2010’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect on January 30, 2010. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

         Subsidiaries (Domestic and International) of Globix Corporation

                 Subsidiary                    Jurisdiction of Incorporation
                 ----------                    -----------------------------

ATC Merger Corporation                                       New York

Bluestreak Digital, Inc.                                     New York

GameNet Corporation                                          New York

NAFT Computer Service Corporation                            New York

NAFT International Ltd.                                      New York

PFM Communications Inc.                                      New York

GRE Consulting, Inc.                                         New York

415 Greenwich GC, LLC                                      New York LLC

415 Greenwich GC Tenant, LLC                               New York LLC

415 Greenwich GC MM, LLC                                   New York LLC

Comstar.net, Inc.                                            Georgia

Comstar Telecom & Wireless, Inc.                             Georgia

Globix Holdings (UK) Limited                                 England

Globix Limited                                               England

GLX Leasing Limited                                          England

Globix Denmark ApS                                           Denmark

Globix (Netherlands) BV                                    Netherlands

Globix Internet Services GmbH                                Austria

Globix SpA                                                    Italy

Globix GmbH                                                  Germany
EXHIBIT 10.18



CONFIDENTIAL

September 3, 1997



Andrew Galligan
Chief Financial Officer
Molecular Devices Corporation
1311 Orleans Drive
Sunnyvale, California   94089-1136


Dear Andrew:

In view of your position as a Corporate Senior Manager at Molecular Devices, and
in consideration  of your services in your capacity of Chief Financial  Officer,
the Board of  Directors  has approved  the  commitment  by the Company to you to
provide you with certain benefits in the event your employment is terminated for
specified  reasons.  The  purpose of this letter  agreement  is to set forth the
terms  and  conditions  of the  Company's  agreement  with you  concerning  such
benefits.

First,  the  Compensation  Committee of the Board has decided to raise your base
salary to $150,000 per year effective as of August 1, 1997.  Congratulations for
this raise.  Second,  the  Compensation  Committee also confirmed that your 1997
bonus  will be at the 1997  Management  Bonus  Plan  level  of 40% of your  1997
compensation, subject to the Company's meeting its financial objective of EPS at
$0.52 or more per  share  for  calendar  1997 and to your  continued  employment
through that date.  This bonus will be paid promptly  following  announcement by
the Company of its financial results for 1997 (expected in late January 1998).

In the event of a Change of Control and if you agree to continue your employment
through the effective Change-of-Control date, all your stock options will become
fully vested at such date, subject to the transaction not having to qualify as a
"pooling of  interests."  Of course,  no such  acceleration  can take place in a
"pooling."  In  addition,  at the  time  of your  leaving  the  Company,  at the
Change-of-Control  closing date,  the Company would pay you a one time severance
payment  equal to the last  twelve  months of your total  compensation  (last 12
months salary plus most recent annual bonus awarded to you).

In the event a new CEO is  appointed  and you  agree to  remain in your  present
position  for a minimum  of three  months  after  the new CEO is in  place,  the
Company will pay you at the time of your departure a one time severance  payment
equal to the last twelve months salary.

<PAGE>

CONFIDENTIAL
September 3, 1997
Page 2

 I hope  that  presents  a  satisfactory  arrangement  and  that  the  foregoing
clarifications assist you in the decision to continue to assist the Company.

Sincerely,




              Andre F. Marion
--------------------------------------------
              Andre F. Marion
       For the Compensation Committee

    Approved this day: September 3, 1997

              Andrew Galligan
--------------------------------------------
              Andrew Galligan
Order entered August 27, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00913-CR

EDWON KUMONT JULIAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-45796-V

ORDER

The Court GRANTS court reporter Robin Benton’s August 22, 2013 motion for 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record and appellant’s August 23, 2013 motion for 

extension of time to file the statement of facts.

We ORDER Ms. Benton to file the reporter’s record within THIRTY (30) DAYS from 

the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                       INTEREP NATIONAL RADIO SALES, INC.

                           100 Park Avenue, 5th Floor
                            New York, New York 10017

               Letter To Commission Pursuant To Temporary Note 3T

                                              April 1, 2002




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

                  Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X,
Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. has obtained a letter of representation from
Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was
subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of
Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national office
consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not
relevant to this audit.

                                Very truly yours,

                                INTEREP NATIONAL RADIO SALES, INC.
                                By: /s/ RALPH C. GUILD
                                ---------------------------------------------
                                Name:  Ralph C. Guild
                                Title: President, Chief Executive
                                       Officer & Chairman of the
                                       Board
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

NATHAN ALLISON, Case No. 1:18-cv-100

Plaintiff,

Dlott, J.

vs Bowman, M.J.

TROOPER MARK JOHNSON, REPORT AND

Defendant. RECOMMENDATION

Following plaintiff’s initiation of this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, the Court ordered plaintiff 

to show cause why the case, which appeared to raise a constitutional challenge to a pending 

criminal charge, should not be stayed pending resolution of the underlying criminal case in state 

court. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff was notified that his failure to comply with the Court’s Order would 

result in the dismissal of his complaint for want of prosecution. (Doc. 4, at PageID 35).

To date, long after the thirty-day period for plaintiff to comply with the Court’s Order has 

expired, plaintiff has failed to respond. “District courts have the inherent power to sua sponte 

dismiss civil actions for want of prosecution to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the 

orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 630–631 

(1962). See also Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108, 109 (6th Cir. 1991). Failure of a party to 

respond to an order of the court warrants invocation of the Court’s inherent power. See Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this case should be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to comply with

the Court’s Order to Show Cause (Doc. 4).

It is therefore RECOMMENDED that this matter be DISMISSED for lack of 

prosecution. IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

s/Stephanie K. Bowman

Stephanie K. Bowman 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 1:18-cv-00100-SJD-SKB Doc #: 5 Filed: 06/14/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 36
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

NATHAN ALLISON, Case No. 1:18-cv-100

Plaintiff,

Dlott, J.

vs Bowman, M.J.

TROOPER MARK JOHNSON,

Defendant.

NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of 

the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the 

proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on 

timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected 

to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report 

and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral 

hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such 

portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the 

assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections 

WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in 

accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 

(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Case: 1:18-cv-00100-SJD-SKB Doc #: 5 Filed: 06/14/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 37
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00393

- CV

Towncreek Industrial, LLC ; H& H

Steel Fabricators, Inc. ; Alltex Steel,

Inc. ; and James Tobey

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, National

Association §

§

§

§ From the 43rd District Court

of Parker County (CV15

- 0501)

October 27, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gabriel



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s summary judgment. It is ordered that the

summary judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Towncreek Industrial, LLC, H & H Steel

Fabricators, Inc., Alltex Steel, Inc., and James Tobey shall bear the costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel