alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Uradni list C 34A/29.

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 34A |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 5929. januar 2016 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 34A

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 5929. januar 2016

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Objave |
| | UPRAVNI POSTOPKI |
| | Svet |
| 2016/C 034A/01 | Podaljšanje veljavnosti seznamov primernih kandidatov | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

V   Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Svet

2016/C 034A/01

Podaljšanje veljavnosti seznamov primernih kandidatov

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

V Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Svet

| 29.1.2016 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CA 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2016

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CA 34/1

---

Podaljšanje veljavnosti seznamov primernih kandidatov

(2016/C 034 A/01)

S sklepom generalnega sekretarja Sveta Evropske unije se podaljša veljavnost seznamov primernih kandidatov, oblikovanih na podlagi naslednjih javnih natečajev do 31. decembra 2016.

| Svet/421/AD5 | za pripravo rezervnega seznama za zaposlovanje upravljavcev pomočnikov na področju varnosti (Kabinet/varnost: notranja varnostna služba); natečaj je bil objavljen v 
  Uradnem listu Evropske unije C 316 A z dne 13. decembra 2005; |
| --- | --- |
| CONS/AD/430


  (dva poklicna profila) | za pripravo rezervnega seznama za zaposlovanje višjih administratorjev na področju evropske varnostne in obrambne politike (EVOP). Natečaj zadeva dva poklicna profila v razredu AD9 (profil 1: višji uradnik za strateško načrtovanje operacij in misij kriznega upravljanja; profil 2: višji uradnik za načrtovanje vojaških/civilnih/vesoljskih zmogljivosti); natečaj je bil objavljen v 
  Uradnem listu Evropske unije C-178A z dne 15. julija 2008; |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | za pripravo rezervnega seznama za zaposlovanje vodij enote v razredu AD12 na področju prevajanja z irščino kot prvim jezikom; natečaj je bil objavljen v 
  Uradnem listu Evropske unije C-99A z dne 30. aprila 2009. |

Svet/421/AD5

za pripravo rezervnega seznama za zaposlovanje upravljavcev pomočnikov na področju varnosti (Kabinet/varnost: notranja varnostna služba); natečaj je bil objavljen v 
  Uradnem listu Evropske unije C 316 A z dne 13. decembra 2005;

CONS/AD/430

(dva poklicna profila)

za pripravo rezervnega seznama za zaposlovanje višjih administratorjev na področju evropske varnostne in obrambne politike (EVOP). Natečaj zadeva dva poklicna profila v razredu AD9 (profil 1: višji uradnik za strateško načrtovanje operacij in misij kriznega upravljanja; profil 2: višji uradnik za načrtovanje vojaških/civilnih/vesoljskih zmogljivosti); natečaj je bil objavljen v 
  Uradnem listu Evropske unije C-178A z dne 15. julija 2008;

CONS-COMM/AD/433

za pripravo rezervnega seznama za zaposlovanje vodij enote v razredu AD12 na področju prevajanja z irščino kot prvim jezikom; natečaj je bil objavljen v 
  Uradnem listu Evropske unije C-99A z dne 30. aprila 2009.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

Laura Stewart 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Impact Fulfillment Services, Inc. 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 3:18-cv-103 

Judge Thomas Rose 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: 

TERMINATION ENTRY 

 

 The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter 

has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with 

prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause 

shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. 

 Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement 

should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 

(1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

July 20, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 ____________________________________ 

 Honorable Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00772]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 12, 2022; 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be conducted by remote means.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Closed to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Briefing Matter.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Secretary, 
Division of the Secretariat, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. 
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, 
MD 20814, (301) 504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (cell).
    * The Commission unanimously determined by recorded vote to close 
the meeting and that agency business requires calling the meeting 
without seven calendar days advance public notice.

    Dated: January 11, 2022.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00772 Filed 1-12-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
July 08, 2015

US Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 1200 

New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, 

DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption Request - Public Interest Statement for Docket No. FAA2015-0629

Dear Sir or Madam:

In response to your letter dated June 29th, I am submitting the following Public interest 

addendum per your request as required under 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Subpart A, Section 

11.81(d)&(e):

How Prestige Aerials Request Will Benefit the Public As A Whole

Aerial photography and videography for has been around for a long time through manned 

fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters. The introduction of UAS increases public safety since 

size and lack of combustible fuel alleviates many of the potential threats to the public

inherent to full-size aircraft. Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the public’s interest 

to integrate commercially flown UAS's into the National Airspace System, hence the passing 

of the Reform Act. Granting Prestige Aerial’s exemption request furthers the public interest 

in the following ways:

1) Agriculturally – Specialized imagery obtained from our vehicles provides critical 

on-going and real-time information on crop health allowing farmers to target 

problems in only specific areas of the crop, reducing both water consumption and 

pesticide use over traditional blanketed remediation efforts.

2) Inspections – Photography from UAS used for inspection purposes mitigates many 

dangers to individuals working at height and in dangerous environments; it further 

reduces downtime that could effect whole communities for high voltage utility and 

cellular tower inspections as these could now be performed while the system is live.

My ultra lightweight UAS is battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the 

environment. The consequence of my ultra lightweight UAS crashing is far less than a full 

size helicopter or fixed wing aircraft; which are heavy, contain combustible fuel and can 

cause catastrophic devastation to the public. 

Sincerely,

Matthew Johnson

Founder, Prestige Aerial
#### Carol TOWNSEND and Kenneth BROWN *v.*Alex NESTERENKO, Barry McGRAW, Ethel J. FAUGHT and Evelyn BRINK

81-116

619 S.W. 2d 673

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered July 20, 1981

*Mays, Crutcher & Brown, P.A.,*by: *Darrell P.*Brown, for appellants.

*Boswell & Smith, P.A.,*by: *Ted Boswell,*for appellee McGraw.

*Matthews & Sanders,*by: *Gail O. Matthews, P.A.,*for appellee Faught.

Per Curiam.

This case arose out of a four-car collision in which a car occupied by appellants first side-swiped appellee McGraw’s parked car and, then, was immediately struck in the rear by the car driven by appellee Faught; after all of the occupants were out of their cars, a fourth car driven by Evelyn Brink struck the rear of the one driven by Faught. Evelyn Brink and Alex Nesterenko are not properly named as appellees since appellants’ complaint against them was dismissed prior to submission of the case to the jury. This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for the defendants-appellees.

For reversal appellants first argue that the trial court erred in denying their motion in limine to prohibit references by the appellees to appellant Townsend’s conviction for prostitution and appellant Brown’s involvement in *455gambling. Appellants next argue that the trial court erred in its failure to grant a motion for a new trial since the verdict was contrary to the clear preponderance of the evidence. We do not reach the merits of either point since appellant has failed to properly abstract the following parts of the record as required by Rule 9(d), Rules of the Supreme Court, Ark. Stat. Ann., Vol. 3A (Repl. 1979):

> 1. The complaint stating what damages were sought by the appellants.

> 2. The court order or ruling denying appellants’ motion in limine.

> 3. The judgment and other parts of the record necessary to consider the motion for new trial.

> 4. Appellants’ motion for a new trial stating the grounds therefor.

> 5. A court order or ruling denying appellants’ motion for a new trial.

Therefore, we must affirm the trial court under Rule 9 (e) (2) as we have done in numerous cases. *Bank of Ozark*v. *Isaacs,*263 Ark. 113, 563 S.W. 2d 707 (1978), *Smith*v. *Bullard,*271 Ark. 794 (1981).

Affirmed.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant to 18 USC. § 1350, As AdoptedPursuant to**

**§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

** **

In connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) as amended bythis Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2014 (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Ryan, ChiefExecutive Officer, President and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

/s/ Christopher J. Ryan

Christopher J. Ryan

Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary

 

April 29, 2014

** **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Global Perspective Portfolio L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      12,963,692
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,895<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,669,806<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,669,806<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (51,780)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               398,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (449,952)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (449,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (449,952)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include Due from DWR of $65,882 and interest
receivable of $55,013.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $585,219.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $359,021, accrued
management fees of $34,137 and accrued administrative expenses
of $15,095.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $189,568, net
change in unrealized of $(401,806) and interest income of $160,458.
</FN>


</TABLE>
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 646 

Recognizing the 70th Anniversary of the Fulbright Program in Thailand. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 2, 2020 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. CARDIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 70th Anniversary of the Fulbright Program 

in Thailand. 

Whereas the Kingdom of Thailand and the United States of 

America first established relations in 1818 and entered 

into the Treaty of Amity and Commerce in 1833; 

Whereas the Fulbright Program is sponsored by the Bureau 

of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the Department of 

State; 

Whereas the Fulbright Program currently operates in over 

150 countries; 

Whereas the Thailand-United States Educational Foundation 

(TUSEF) was established by a formal agreement in 

1950; 

Whereas 2020 is the 70th anniversary of the Fulbright Program partnership with the Kingdom of Thailand; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 646 IS 

Whereas, recognizing the value of bilateral exchange, the 

Government of Thailand has financially contributed to 

the binational TUSEF annually since 1989; 

Whereas nearly 2,000 Fulbright students and scholars from 

Thailand have studied, conducted research, or lectured in 

the United States since TUSEF’s founding; 

Whereas over 1,300 Fulbright grantees from the United 

States conducted research or gave lectures in Thailand 

since TUSEF’s founding; and 

Whereas the United States Government supports additional 

programs in Thailand in the areas of education, rule of 

law, and internationally recognized human rights: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes and commends the 70th anniver3 sary of the Fulbright Program in Thailand; and 

4 (2) encourages the President to maintain and 

5 expand interaction with the Kingdom of Thailand in 

6 ways that facilitate close coordination and partner7 ship in the areas of education and cultural exchange 

8 throughout all of Thailand and the United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Parmeter v Grand Rapids Public Schools,

Nos. 90922, 90923.

Leave to appeal as cross-appellant is also denied. Court of Appeals Nos. 118673, 118974.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: September 4, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT: September 3, 2014, Conference Call Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on September 3, 

2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The majority of the 

discussion centered on renewable credits and projecting CO2 using modeling. The Carbon Power 

Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA Region 7:

Mark A. Smith

Ward Burns

Toni Gargas

Josh Tapp

Mike Jay

Iowa Department of Natural Resources

Catherine Fitzsimmons

Marnie Stein

Jason Marcel

Kansas Department of Health and 

Environment

Melissa Weide

Miles Stotts

Lynn Deahl

Tom Gross

Rick Brunetti

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

Emily Wilbur

Paul Meyers

Nebraska Department of Environmental 

Quality
Adam Yarina

Brian Kozisek

Katie Gutierrez
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT OF ATHEROGENICS, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      56,367,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  873,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,973,138
<PP&E>                                       3,114,531
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,418,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,848,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,013,221
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   103,578,866
<OTHER-SE>                                 (47,837,639)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,848,802
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,060,485
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,308,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (806,520)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,441,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (10,441,537)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.66)


</TABLE>
#### Watkins *v.*Arnold.

Opinion rendered April 27, 1901.

INTERVENTION — Judgment.—Where plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from cutting timber on land claimed by him, and defendants claimed the right to cut under a third person who was permitted to intervene, setting up title in herself, on finding the issues in favor of the intervener judgment should be a dismissal of the bill for want of equity, and not a decree quieting the intervener’s title.

Appeal from Izard Circuit Court.

Jno. B. MoGaleb, Judge.

Action by Watkins against Arnold and others to enjoin defendants from cutting timber on land claimed by plaintiff under a tax title. Defendants denied plaintiff’s title, and alleged that Jane Gray was the owner of the land, and that they had authority from her to cut the timber. • She was permitted to intervene and set up title in herself. The court denied the injunction, and decreed that plaintiff’s tax title be canceled and intervener’s title quieted. Plaintiff has appealed.

*J. A.*Watkins, for appellant.

Appellee was not in possession adversely to appellant’s title. 58 Ark. 512; 34 Ark. 84: 15 Am. Dec. 433; 33 *id.*165; 45 Ark. 427; 60 Ark. 70. A tenant at sufferance cannot give to his holding that character of adverse possession which would ripen into a title bjr limitation. 42 Ark. 118; 33 *id.*633; 43 Ark. 485; Tied. B. Prop. § 226.

*J. B.*Baker, *De B. Bradshaw*and *T. E.*Seim,, for appellees.

Appellee’s title by adverse possession was complete. *Gf.*27 Ark. 75; 23 Ark. 117.

Bunn, C. J.

The decree in this case will be affirmed in effect, but modified so that the bill will be dismissed for want of equity, instead of decreeing title in fee in the appellee, Jane Gray, generally. She still holds under the same title, no greater, no less, than *264when the suit was instituted, although, as between herself and the appellant, the latter must fail on her claim of title by adverse possession.

With this modification, the decree is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gary S. Titus, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer, of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                           
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2009 |  | /s/    Gary S. Titus                                      
|                     |  | Gary S. Titus                                             
|                     |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.