alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
BOBBIE JARVIS, Case No. 1:17-cv-859
Plaintiff, Black, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.

vs.
COMMISSIONER OF REPORT AND
SOCIAL SECURITY, RECOMMENDATION
Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint Stipulation to Award EAJA [Equal
Access to Justice Act] Fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Doc. 20). The parties have stipulated and
petitioned the Court to award attorney fees in the amount of $3,200.00 in full satisfaction and
settlement of any and all claims plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. The
parties have stipulated that the award will satisfy all of plaintiffs claims for fees, costs and
expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case. The parties acknowledge that any fees paid
belong to plaintiff and not his attorney and can be offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that
plaintiff owes the United States under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). The parties further
stipulate that after the Court enters this award, if their counsel can verify that plaintiff owes no
pre-existing debt subject to offset, defendant agrees to direct that the award be made payable to
plaintiff's counsel pursuant to an EAJA assignment duly signed by plaintiff and his counsel.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the parties’ joint stipulation for an
award of attomey fees (Doc. 20) be GRANTED and that plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in

the amount of $3,200.00.

Date: fiz L q
Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

BOBBIE JARVIS, Case No. 1:17-cv-859

Plaintiff, Black, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.

vs.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of
the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the
proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on
timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected
to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report
and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral
hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such
portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the
assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections
WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in

accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140

(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer Certification**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the purpose of complyingwith Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code.

 

R. Jack DeCrane, the Chief Executive Officer and Richard J. Kaplan, theChief Financial Officer of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc., each certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.             theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and

 

2.             theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings,Inc.

 
| Date: August 16, 2004 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |   |
|                       |   |
|                       | /s/  R. JACK DECRANE |   |
|                       | R. Jack DeCrane |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer |
|                       |   |
|                       |   |
|                       | /s/  RICHARD J. KAPLAN |   |
|                       | Richard J. Kaplan |
|                       | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                       | Secretary and Treasurer |

 

----
#### David POTTER v. Betty POTTER

85-25

690 S.W.2d 124

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered June 3, 1985

*Steel & Steel,*by; *George E. Steel, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Smith, Jernigan*& *Smith,*by: *Robert D. Smith,*for appellee.

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

What the appellant calls a petition for a temporary restraining order and injunction is, in effect, merely a request for the trial judge to change his prior ruling.

The parties were divorced in 1981, and we modified that decree in *Potter*v. *Potter,*280 Ark. 38, 655 S.W.2d 382 (1983). The parties’ residence was ordered sold and Mrs. Potter bought it. The sale to her was confirmed; the confirmation is the subject of a separate appeal.

The appellant moved for permission to occupy the house during the pending of that appeal since Mrs. Potter had moved out and to enjoin her from renting the premises to a third party. The judge denied the request without a hearing. Although Potter characterized his prayer as one for injunctive relief, in effect, the motion asked the judge to change his prior ruling which gave Mrs. Potter temporary occupancy, ordered the home sold and confirmed the sale. The appellant’s request is not a final and appealable order as defined in Ark. R. App. P. 2. If it were, all orders before, during and after a divorce decree could be *170appealed.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Injet Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2004 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  November 12, 2004
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 458 

For the relief of Alejandro E. Gonzales. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2009 

Mr. PASTOR of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Alejandro E. Gonzales. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, DE4 NIAL OF ADMISSION TO, ALEJANDRO E. 

5 GONZALES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 212(a) 

7 and 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 

8 Alejandro E. Gonzales may not be removed from the 

9 United States, or denied admission to the United States, 

10 by reason of any act of his that is a ground for removal 

11 or denial of admission and is reflected in the records of 

12 the Department of Homeland Security, or the Visa Office 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 458 IH

1 of the Department of State, on the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act. 

3 (b) RESCISSION OF OUTSTANDING ORDER OF RE4 MOVAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall re5 scind any outstanding order of removal, or any finding of 

6 inadmissibility or deportability, that has been entered 

7 against Alejandro E. Gonzales by reason of any act de8 scribed in subsection (a). 

9 (c) ESTABLISHMENT OF GOOD MORAL CHAR10 ACTER.—Notwithstanding section 101(f) of the Immigra11 tion and Nationality Act, any act described in subsection 

12 (a) may not be considered in determining whether 

13 Alejandro E. Gonzales is, or during any period has been, 

14 a person of good moral character for purposes of the Im15 migration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
```

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS
                 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the quarterly report of HydroFlo, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis L. Mast,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
based on my knowledge:

        1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2005

/s/ DENNIS L. MAST
Dennis L. Mast
Chief Executive Officer
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JAMES JOHNSON, : Case No. 3:18-cv-20

Plaintiff, : District Judge Walter H. Rice

: Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
vs. :

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of
United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case was
originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been
filed and that the time for filing such objections, if any, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), has
expired, this Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 8, 2019
(Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full;

2. The Commissioner’s non-disability finding is VACATED;

3. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff James Johnson was

under a “disability” within the meaning of the Social Security
Act;

4. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security
Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for
further consideration consistent with the Report and
Recommendations and this Decision; and


5: The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4543 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 629
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4543

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2010

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                           September 29, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, as the ``Anthony J. 
                    Cortese Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTHONY J. CORTESE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Anthony J. Cortese Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Anthony J. 
Cortese Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 629

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4543

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, as the ``Anthony J. 
                    Cortese Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 29, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 23-0731

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BILLY JOE ROGERS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 19 2024

03/19/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0731
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**ZORAN CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, LevyGerzberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Zoran Corporation and will be retained byZoran Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 
|                  | /s/ Levy Gerzberg                     |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                  | Levy Gerzberg                         |
| Dated: March 31, 2005 | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.01 Certification Under
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Steve Tirado, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K of Silicon Image, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 15, 2005 /s/ Steve Tirado
Steve Tirado
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Alec v Holland Motor Express Company,

No. 90823;

Court of Appeals No. 132612.
NO. 12-19-00144-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: OLD REPUBLIC RISK 

MANAGEMENT, OLD REPUBLIC 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

THORNTON, BIECHLIN, REYNOLDS 

& GUERRA, L.C., TIMOTHY K. 

SINGLEY AND DANA M. GANNON,

RELATORS

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relators, Old Republic Risk Management, Old Republic Insurance Company, Thornton, 

Biechlin, Reynolds, and Guerra, L.C., Timothy K. Singley, and Dana M. Gannon, filed this 

original proceeding to challenge Respondent’s denial of their plea to the jurisdiction and motion 

to dismiss.1 Debra Morris, Individually and as representative of the Estate of Kenneth W. Morris, 

Ashley Bialowas f/k/a Ashley Morris, Amanda Morris Wright, Jimmy Williams, Rebecca 

Williams, Orlando Ordaz, and Roy McCollough are the Real Parties in Interest (RPIs). 

On June 12, 2019, this Court conditionally granted Relators’ petition and directed 

Respondent to vacate his March 18, 2019, order denying Relators’ plea to the jurisdiction and issue 

an order (1) granting the plea to the jurisdiction with respect to the RPIs’ claims for fraudulent 

lien, insurance code violations, fraud, independent fraudulent acts by lawyer/law firm, and 

conspiracy to assert fraudulent lien; and (2) abating the trial court proceeding pending the Division 

of Workers’ Compensation’s resolution of whether Old Republic is entitled to seek administrative 

costs as part of its subrogation claim and whether the amount of benefits paid has been wrongfully 

inflated. By an order signed on June 14, Respondent complied with this Court’s opinion and order, 

 1 Respondent is the Honorable Paul E. White, Judge of the 159th District Court in Angelina County, Texas.
2

rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus 

as moot.

Opinion delivered June 28, 2019.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
3

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 28, 2019

NO. 12-19-00144-CV

OLD REPUBLIC RISK MANAGEMENT, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, 

THORNTON, BIECHLIN, REYNOLDS & GUERRA, L.C., TIMOTHY K. SINGLEY 

AND DANA M. GANNON,

Relators

V.

HON. PAUL E. WHITE,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Old 

Republic Risk Management, Old Republic Insurance Company, Thornton, Biechlin, Reynolds & 

Guerra, L.C., Timothy K. Singley, and Dana M. Gannon; who are the relators in appellate cause 

number 12-19-00144-CV and defendants in trial court cause number CV-00050-18-1, on the 

docket of the 159th Judicial District Court of Angelina County, Texas. Said petition for writ of 

mandamus having been filed herein on April 16, 2019, and the same having been duly considered, 

because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, 
4

ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, 

hereby dismissed as moot.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-242

Judge Marbley

David L. Dobbins 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 36) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Counts 1-5 and 7 of the Superseding

Indictment, and he is hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The

Court will defer the decision of whether to accept the plea

agreement until the sentencing hearing.

Date: September 25, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge