alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin Molina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1.

this report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the 1934 Act, and



2.

the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



By: /s/ Edwin Molina

-----------------------------------

Name: Edwin Molina

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:November 14, 2008
*Present*— Chancollore Mathews and Rutledge.

OCTOBER, *1795.*

#### M'Dowel vs. Teasdale.

CASE cvfc

decree book. ’u1'u'p' ^

"?s covei,y. The dddidddadxe charges, and ids books of jdssud(!°[.d'^-“o^piidminf produced on-jfess0,£ port of his clies?hnoiw was positn-e cip;xi chii^u, ^ tradiction; and llis te‘JT!" supported by court held it-take^ihe'ini swer as true, IxcoEdinM".

This bill is brought for a discovery by defendants .oath, whether* it was not expressly understood by Idm, that a certain quantity of goods, consigned to him by complainant, were to be sold on a commission of seven and a half per cent; and whether the amount sales, if sold on a credit by defendant, were not to be guaranteed by and not sold at his (the complai-him to complainant, •nant’s) risk. denies that the goods were taken by him at liis risk, The defendant in his answer positively be sold by him on commissions complainants. His book in which the original entry or account; or that he was to garantee the payment of the amount sales; but insists they were received and to at the sole risk of the of the transaction was made was produced, which corroborated his answer. There was only one witness produced in support of the charge in the bill, who swore that the complainant directed the goods to be sold for cash, or if on a credit, defendant must have the money ready for .them when he returned; and it was also agreed, that if defendant guaranteed, he was to be allowed seven and one half per cent; he also swore that the last goods were delivered on the same terms as the former parcels were. It is the invariable law of this court that as the defendant is compelled to answer on oath the charges of the bill, Ms answer must be taken to be trae, xinless contradicted by the positive testimony of two witnesses, or the testimony of one witness, with strong circumstances. The defendant having positively denied the charge against him, and supported such denial by the evidence ox Ms book containing the original entry made at the time of the agreement; and there being no proofs against the answer; and it likewise appearing on examining the book that the first parcel of goods was sold oh the account and risk of the complainant, we are of opinion that the weight of evidence strongly preponderates in favour of defendant; and that he can by no means be considered as a guarantee to the únanf for the *460goods sold, and therefore he is not liable for any loss sustained by the insolvency of the persons to whom they were sold. It was ordered and decreed, that the defend dant assign over to complainant and deliver to his attorney the vouchers against the respective purchasers of the goods, on being indemnified; also that he account before the master for what monies he has received; that a com? mission of five per cent he allowed on such monies; and only two and one half, for the goods sold and not paid for; that a'reasonable allowance be also made for store hire; and lastly that the complainant do pay the costs of-this Suit.
#### Daugherty *v.*State.

Opinion delivered September 24, 1917.

Larceny — horse—amount of punishment. — Appellant was indicted for the larceny of a buggy of the value of $40, a set of harness of the value of $10, and a horse. The jury found defendant guilty and fixed his punishment at 10 years in the penitentiary. The court instructed the jury that they could convict and punish either for the larceny of the horse or of the buggy and harness. *Held,*under this instruction the conviction was manifestly for the larceny of the horse, and that therefore, under the statute, the punishment fixed was not excessive.

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court; *W. B. Sorrells,*Judge;

affirmed.

*John D. Arbuckle,*Attorney General, and *T. W. Campbell,*Assistant, for appellee.

1. The verdict is not cruel nor excessive. Kirby’s Digest, § 1828; 45 L. R. A. (note) 136; 113 Ark. 454-464; 68 N. W. 636; 69 *Id.*953; 78 Pac. 897; 102 Fed. 473.

2. The evidence fully sustains the verdict.

WOOD, J.

Appellant was convicted, on an indictment charging him with “feloniously taking, stealing and carrying away one buggy of the value of forty dollars, and one set of harness of the value of ten dollars, and one horse, all the property of L. F. Boston,” etc. The jury fixed the punishment at ten years in the State penitentiary, and from the judgment of sentence the appellant prosecutes this appeal.

The only specific ground in the motion for a new trial is because the verdict of the jury “assesses his punishment for grand larceny of property that the proof shows was not over forty dollars in value at ten years in the penitentiary, which is cruel and excessive.”

The statute provides that “whoever shall be convicted of stealing any horse,” etc., shall be imprisoned in the State penitentiary not less than one nor more than fifteen years. The punishment in cases of grand larceny, under the general statute, is not less than one nor more than five, years.

*334The trial court instructed the jury that if they found the appellant guilty they could only fix his punishment for the larceny of either the horse or the buggy and harness. The jury, under this instruction, manifestly fixed the punishment of the appellant as for the larceny of the horse. The statute authorizes the punishment thus adjudged, and the verdict did not exceed the maximum penalty prescribed by the statute for the larceny of a horse. Therefore, no unusual, cruel or excessive punishment was imposed. See *In re Wm. W. Taylor,*45 L. R. A. 136, and note.

No specific assignment of error in the giving of instructions is set up in the motion for a new trial. The motion for a new trial contains only a general assignment, “that the verdict is contrary to the law.” We find no error in the instructions.

The only other ground of the motion for a new trial is that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. It could serve no useful purpose to set out in detail and discuss the evidence. It was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The judgment is, therefore, in all things correct, and it is affirmed.
Case: 2:18-cv-00235-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 03/22/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 80
Case: 2:18-cv-00235-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 03/22/18 Page: 2 of 4 PAGEID #: 81
Case: 2:18-cv-00235-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 03/22/18 Page: 3 of 4 PAGEID #: 82
Case: 2:18-cv-00235-JLG-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 03/22/18 Page: 4 of 4 PAGEID #: 83
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Acorn Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Barth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Michael BarthMichael BarthChief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2011
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00403

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. DC89

- CV2 022

- 1635

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Wal ker , J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### S ARA 

### E. B INION AND 

### W ENDY 

### M. B INION 

### , Appellants

V



### .
E LIZABETH 

### V ALENCIA 

### A LLEN 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On February 2, 2023, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days, appellants filed

with the court a n appellant s’ brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension wa s needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response. Because appellant s have failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : March 23, 2023
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.1


EXHIBIT A


MEMBERS


	
				
	Name, Address, Fax and E-mail
	Sharing
Ratio
	Parent
	Representative and Alternate Representatives

	

MVP HOLDCO, LLC


EQT Plaza
625 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222
Fax: (412) 553-7781
Attention: Blue Jenkins
   [***]
   David Gray
   [***]
   Sean McGinty
   [***]


with a copy to:


Baker Botts L.L.P.
98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1500
Austin, Texas 78701
Fax: (512) 322-8349
Attn: Michael L. Bengtson
         [***]




	

54%
	

EQT Corporation
	

David Gray – Representative




Blue Jenkins – Alternate Representative



	

US MARCELLUS GAS INFRASTRUCTURE, LLC


601 Travis Street
Suite 1900
Houston, Texas 77002
Fax:  713.751.0375
Attention: Lawrence A. Wall, Jr.
   [***]
   Karina Amelang
   [***]


 
	

35%
	

NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc.
	

TJ Tuscai, Chief Executive Officer – Representative




Lawrence A. Wall, Jr., President – Alternate Representative



	WGL MIDSTREAM, INC.


c/o WGL Holdings, Inc.
101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20080
Fax: (202) 624-6655
Attn: Anthony M. Nee
         [***]


	7%
	WGL Holdings, Inc.
	N/A

	VEGA MIDSTREAM MVP LLC


c/o Vega Energy Partners, Ltd.
3701 Kirby Dr., Suite 1290
Houston, Texas 77098
Fax: (713) 527-0850
Attn: David A. Modesett
         [***]


with a copy to:


Norton Rose Fulbright
1301 McKinney St., Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77010
Fax: (713) 651-5246
Attn: Ned Crady 
         [***]


	3%
	Vega Energy Partners, Ltd.
	N/A

	VEGA NPI IV, LLC


c/o Vega Energy Partners, Ltd.
3701 Kirby Dr., Suite 1290
Houston, Texas 77098
Fax: (713) 527-0850
Attn: David A. Modesett
         [***]


with a copy to:


Norton Rose Fulbright
1301 McKinney St., Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77010
Fax: (713) 651-5246
Attn: Ned Crady 
         [***]


	0%
	Vega Energy Partners, Ltd.
	N/A

	RGC MIDSTREAM, LLC


519 Kimball Ave NE
Roanoke, Virginia 24016
Fax: (540) 777-2636
Attn: Paul Nester
         [***]




	1%
	RGC Resources, Inc.
	N/A







Exhibit A
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


I, Steven A. Odom, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Verso
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.       The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
         December 31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C.ss.ss.78m or 78o(d)); and

2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 14, 2003
        --------
                                        /s/ Steven A. Odom
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        STEVEN A. ODOM
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Gary Siegel, Vice President,
Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
            May 13,
      2010





/s/ GARY SIEGEL*Name:
                Gary
      SiegelTitle:
                Vice
      President, Finance





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by Genta Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3935 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3935

To establish a temporary minimum price for Class II and Class III milk 
      under Federal milk marketing orders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2009

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish a temporary minimum price for Class II and Class III milk 
      under Federal milk marketing orders, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Our Dairy Farmers Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY MINIMUM PRICE FOR CLASS II AND CLASS III MILK UNDER 
              FEDERAL MILK MARKETING ORDERS.

    (a) Minimum Price.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
during the 12-month period beginning on the effective date of this Act, 
the minimum price for Class II milk and Class III milk under each 
Federal milk marketing order issued under section 8c(5) of the 
Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(5)), reenacted with 
amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, shall 
be as follows:
            (1) For Class II milk, $17.23 per hundredweight.
            (2) For Class III milk, $16.81 per hundredweight.
    (b) Report on Stabilization of Prices Received by Dairy 
Producers.--Not later than 90 days after the effective date of this 
Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to Congress a report 
providing various options (and evaluating the feasibility and likely 
success of each option) to stabilize the prices that dairy farmers 
receive for milk.
    (c) Effective Date.--This Act shall take effect on the first day of 
the first month beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
IIPP

https://secure.cds2.com:8080/main.html?download&weblink=4d0cd383a95e69e45664f2f15becb9f0&r

ealfilename=IIPP-v3.0.pdf
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER FOSTER, et al., é Case No. 1:18-cv-247
Plaintiffs, : Judge Timothy S. Black
vs. i Magistrate Judge Stephanie K.
3 Bowman

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHAB &
CORRECTION, et al.,

Defendants.

DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 13)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United
States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the
Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and, on April 16, 2019, submitted a Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 13). No objections were filed.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all
of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds that the
Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.

Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED.

2. This matter is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution.

3. Plaintiff Christopher Foster’s motion titled “U.S. Attorney General ADA

Request by Plaintiff—Supplemental Complaint Request” (Doc. 11) is
DENIED as moot.


4. The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), an appeal of this
Order would not be taken in good faith; therefore Plaintiff is denied leave
to appeal in forma pauperis.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is
TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: Sig. [WO fomstn, Ghd

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001003130
<NAME> LCA-VISION INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                        165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,793
<PP&E>                                          24,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,741
<BONDS>                                          1,468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,522
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,938
<SALES>                                             17
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,558
<CGS>                                               10
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,016
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,335)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3109-3110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01054]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 4, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Jere M. Ahrens, Jill A. Ahrens and Becky C. Campbell, all of 
Houston, Texas; Karen L. Ahrens, North Fort Myers, Florida; Jessica A. 
Ahrens Bingaman, Fort Worth, Texas; Lindsay S. Ahrens Dahl, Camp Crook, 
South Dakota; Jenna K. Ahrens Brown, Laramie, Wyoming; and Brian E. 
Campbell, San Diego, California; to join the Ahrens Family Control 
Group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of HTB, Inc., 
and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Home Trust & Savings 
Bank, both of Osage, Iowa.


[[Page 3110]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 14, 
2022.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-01054 Filed 1-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Daniel P. Hargrove, :

:

Plaintiff(s), :

: Case Number: 1:17cv748

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

Capt. Frisby, et al., :

:

Defendant(s). :

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on June 12, 2018 (Doc. 25), to whom this case was referred

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the

time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired June 26, 2018, hereby

ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 18) is

GRANTED. All other pending motions (Docs. 13, 14, 17, and 20) are DENIED as MOOT.

This case is hereby TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court