alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, George Morgenstern, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except as disclosed in
          Part I Item 1 to this report; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

  /s/ GEORGE MORGENSTERN
---------------------------------
George Morgenstern
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003




                                     - 27 -
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

Add the work hours. parts cost, ond number (~l U S. registered products to the tah/1.! helow. 1Vhen you ore 

.finished. click nn the "Update Fields., hull on to altfomalical/y.fill in the totals. 

Update Fields ~ 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection ~ ' I 

192.2 0 I (\ ' ~ . li 165 ! I I 

ll I I 1 It )fl l ( I 

')II ' 0 I} I I)() 

I (I ('II O.llll 

(l :I {) ( lj I ' I) ( 11 

I ' ' ()I I '1•1 

i) ' 1}.1 I fl 

'I I' (1 t!fl . .._ 0 ( ljl 

' l \) l)lj I f1f) 

lti• (, nn I ).I 

:! I ', \1 d I II I ),1 

' ( II ' ': 

n '. 'Ill I ·) 

' 0 1)(1 ' (; Ot I 

(j I) tl I '< II ()ij 

I I IJ(; I()(· 

0 II'' I) !IU ' I (,[1 

(} ; I !l flO fl (Ill 

' (! ''" 

\ 

' "I'll 0 t •II 

' ii I ' ) (Ill I {!I} 

The known number of products in compliance: Number 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $2,695,605 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $Warranty 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Inspection \ II Hl .., tl )I 

·, 0 II '• ') \l! 

' 'I I' I) (ll) 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this .field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? · 

YES* 0 NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. -

YES 0 NO IZI 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ' 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
#### L. O. MAKIN *v.*Ethel Adina MAKIN

5-4495

424 S. W. 2d 875

Opinion delivered March 11, 1968

*Curtis E. Richard,*for appellant.

*Hall*& *Tucker*and *John F. Lovell Jr.,*for appellee.

*311George Rose Smith, Justice.

In 1965 the appellee obtained a divorce from the appellant. The decree awarded custody of the couple’s four children to the ap-pellee and directed the appellant to support the children by making weekly payments of $12.50 for each child during its minority.

In 1967 the appellant, upon his own initiative, began paying only half the amount fixed by the decree. Jn response to a citation requiring him to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt, the appellant filed a petition denying that he was the father of the two younger children and asking that the original decree be modified to relieve him from the duty of supporting those two children. This appeal is from an order which in effect sustained a demurrer to that petition, for its failure to state a cause of action, and dismissed it.

The court was right. The petition for a modification of the decree after the expiration of the term was based upon the wife’s asserted fraud on the court. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 29-506 (4) (Repl. 1962). The petition stated that more than a year before the birth of the third child the husband underwent an operation for sterilization. Owing to the subsequent birth of two children he believed at first that the operation had failed. Shortly before filing his petition for modification of the decree he assertedly learned that the operation had really been successful, so that he could not have been the father of the two younger children. For that reason he asked to be relieved of their support.

The petition was demurrable. Actionable fraud on the court, under the statute, must relate to some extrinsic matter and must be something more than false or fraudulent acts or testimony relating to the original cause of action, the truth of which was or might have been in issue.

Several decisions on the point were reviewed in *Alexander*v. *Alexander,*217 Ark. 230, 229 S. W. 2d 234*312(1950), a case decidedly similar to this one. There the divorce decree directed the husband to support a child whom the couple had adopted. The details of obtaining the adoption order had been left to the wife. Later on the husband sought a modification of the support order, asserting a fraud on the court in that the adoption proceeding was void. The husband accordingly alleged that the child was not his either by blood or by adoption, so that he should be exempt from the burden of its support. We rejected that contention, holding that the petition for modification of the support order did not assert an actionable extrinsic fraud on the court. The principle of that decision governs the case at bar.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 3371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01094]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: MRSEC--Penn State 2nd Year Virtual Site Visit 
(1203).

DATE AND TIME: May 2, 2022; 9:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

PLACE: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 [verbar] 
Virtual.

TYPE OF MEETING: Part-Open.

CONTACT PERSON: Dr. Miriam Deutsch, Program Director, Division of 
Materials Research, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Room W 9216, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: (703) 292-5360.

PURPOSE OF MEETING: Virtual site visit to provide an evaluation of the 
progress of the projects at the host site for the Division of Materials 
Research at the National Science Foundation.

AGENDA: 

                               May 2, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m.........  Brief Charge to       CLOSED.
                               Panel.
10:00 a.m.-10:10 a.m........  Introduction........  OPEN.
10:10 a.m.-10:55 a.m........  Director's Overview.  OPEN.
10:55 a.m.-11:10 a.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
11:10 a.m.-11:30 a.m........  IRG-1 Presentation..  OPEN.
11:30 a.m.-11:35 a.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
11:35 a.m.-11:45 a.m........  Break...............  OPEN.
11:45 a.m.-12:05 p.m........  IRG-2 Presentation..  OPEN.
12:05 p.m.-12:10 p.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
12:10 p.m.-12:35 p.m........  Education and         OPEN.
                               Outreach, Diversity
                               Plan.
12:35 p.m.-12:45 p.m........  Discussion/Questions  OPEN.
12:45 p.m.-01:30 p.m........  Working Lunch.......  CLOSED.
01:30 p.m.-02:30 p.m........  Poster Session......  OPEN.
02:30 p.m.-02:45 p.m........  Site Visit            OPEN.
                               Discussion.
02:45 p.m.-03:30 p.m........  Executive Session...  CLOSED.
03:30 p.m.-04:00 p.m........  Debriefing..........  OPEN.
04:00 p.m...................  Adjourn.............
------------------------------------------------------------------------


REASON FOR CLOSING: The work being reviewed during closed portions of 
the virtual site visit include information of a proprietary or 
confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, 
such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the project. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 14, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-01094 Filed 1-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 6-K of Dialex Minerals Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, L. Kirk Boyd,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to the
best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:                                    /s/ L. Kirk Boyd
                                      ----------------------------------
                                       L.Kirk Boyd
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       May 14, 2004

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
CFO Services Agreement


 


This CFO Services Agreement is entered
into as of October 1, 2015 between Jesus Quintero (“Quintero”), and Massroots, Inc.(the “Company”).
Quintero hereby agrees to serve as Chief Financial Officer of Massroots, Inc. for a period of one year.


 


The compensation will be paid monthly
at the beginning of each month, at a rate of USD $4,000.00. Unless otherwise directed by Quintero, all payments shall be issued
in the name of JDE Development LLC and sent to:


 


JDE Development
LLC,


16860 SW 1st Street,
Pembroke Pines, FL 33027.


 


There will be no other fees or charges
by Quintero to the Company other than


pre-approved direct, third party reimbursements
for costs, and pre-approved


travel and related expenses.


 


Specific responsibilities of Quintero for the Company shall
include:


1. Review and analysis of the historical
accounting records


2. Implementation of appropriate internal
financial controls


3. Interacting with the Company’s
internal accounting staff


4. Liaison with the Company’s auditor and securities attorney regarding filing
and reporting requirements


5. Preparation of financial statements
including footnotes for 10Q and 10K reporting


6. Preparation of analysis of operations
as may be required in regulatory filings


7. Preparation as may be required of
forecasts and budgets.


8. Final review and signing of financial
statements and regulatory filings


9. Maintaining the books and records
and U.S. account(s) for the Company


10. Meeting with Company management and visits
to the Company’s facilities as may be required.


11. Participation at investor meetings
and conferences as may be required


12. Responding to phone calls from the
financial community and investors


  


Quintero and the Company agree that
the performance, compensation, and


time commitment by Quintero shall be
reviewed and agreed upon on an annual basis.


Quintero shall be treated as a contract
worker.


 


Quintero shall be entitled to reimbursement
for appropriate business expenses,


as well as travel and related expenses.


 


This CFO Services Agreement shall be
in force until such time as a formal


Employment Agreement is entered into
by Quintero and the Company.


 


Either Quintero or the Company may
terminate this Agreement provided they give ninety (90) days written notice of the termination. Upon termination by the Company,
Quintero shall be entitled to recover from the Company, including, but not limited to, payment for all work performed through
the date of termination.


 


In the event of any dispute between
the parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement, said dispute shall be governed the laws of the State of Florida without
reference to its conflict of law rules.


 


Agreed to:


	/s/ Jesus M Quintero 	10/1/15	/s/ Isaac Dietrich
    	10/1/15
	Jesus M Quintero	Date	Isaac Dietrich, CEO 	Date
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4562 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a temporary deduction 

for interest on unsecured credit card debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2010 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

temporary deduction for interest on unsecured credit 

card debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cash Back Reward 

5 Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY DEDUCTION FOR INTEREST ON UNSE7 CURED CREDIT CARD DEBT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 163(h) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dis10 allowance of deduction for personal interest) is amended 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4562 IH

1 by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (E), by 

2 striking the period at the end of subparagraph (F) and 

3 inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the end the following 

4 new subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(G) any interest— 

6 ‘‘(i) which is paid by an individual on 

7 unsecured credit card debt of the indi8 vidual during taxable years beginning after 

9 December 31, 2009, and before January 1, 

10 2011, and 

11 ‘‘(ii) which is not otherwise allowable 

12 as a deduction under this chapter.’’. 

13 (b) LIMITATION.—Paragraph (4) of section 163(h) of 

14 such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 

15 new subparagraph: 

16 ‘‘(G) DOLLAR LIMITATION ON UNSECURED

17 CREDIT CARD DEBT.—The amount of interest 

18 which may be taken into account under para19 graph (2)(G) shall not exceed $5,000 ($10,000 

20 in the case of a joint return) for any taxable 

21 year.’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,541,281               1,541,281
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  233,750                 233,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,834,053               1,834,053
<PP&E>                                         844,826                 844,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,735                  48,735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,678,879               2,678,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          471,013                 471,013
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        21,538                  21,538
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,186,328               2,186,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,678,879               2,678,879
<SALES>                                        310,863                 424,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               310,863                 424,805
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  279,084                 352,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,105,638               2,004,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 770                   2,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,073,859)             (1,931,918)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,073,859)             (1,931,918)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,073,859)             (1,931,918)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)                  (0.09)


</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1). | The                Report                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2). | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                February 5, 2007 |   | By:                /s/Douglas                I.                Payne  |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Douglas                I.                Payne                             |
|                                  |   | Chief                Financial Officer                                     |
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlumiFuel Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Henry Fong, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.   /s/ Henry FongHenry FongPrincipal Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting OfficerAugust 18, 2011   A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ALUMIFUEL POWER CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ALUMIFUEL POWER CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4540 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend the ban 

on election activity by foreign nationals to election activity by domestic 

corporations which are subsidiaries of foreign principals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2010 

Ms. DELAURO (for herself, Mr. COHEN, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. KAGEN, and Mrs. 

LOWEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

extend the ban on election activity by foreign nationals 

to election activity by domestic corporations which are 

subsidiaries of foreign principals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Foreign Influ5 ence in our Elections Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4540 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF BAN ON CONTRIBUTIONS AND EX2 PENDITURES BY FOREIGN NATIONALS TO DO3 MESTIC CORPORATIONS WHICH ARE SUB4 SIDIARIES OF FOREIGN PRINCIPALS. 

5 Section 319(b) of the Federal Election Campaign Act 

6 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441e(b)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

8 (1); 

9 (2) by striking the period at the end of para10 graph (2) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(3) a corporation (other than a foreign prin14 cipal described in paragraph (1)) with respect to 

15 which the percentage of outstanding shares con16 trolled directly or indirectly by foreign principals is 

17 equal to or greater than 50 percent.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
### -82 -80 -78 -76

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/22 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●