alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4486 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat distributions of debt 

securities in a tax free spin-off transaction in the same manner as 

distributions of cash or other property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2010 

Mr. HODES (for himself, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. MOLLOHAN, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. WELCH, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

ELLISON, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. MICHAUD, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. 

OBERSTAR, Mr. WALZ, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. MASSA, Mr. 

PETERSON, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. KAGEN, and Mr. 

COSTELLO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat distributions of debt securities in a tax free spin-off transaction in the same manner as distributions of cash or 

other property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4486 IH

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF SECURITIES OF A CON2 TROLLED CORPORATION EXCHANGED FOR 

3 ASSETS IN CERTAIN REORGANIZATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 361 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to nonrecognition of gain or 

6 loss to corporations; treatment of distributions) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(d) RECEIPT OF SECURITIES, ETC., IN EXCHANGE

9 FOR ASSETS IN CERTAIN REORGANIZATIONS.—If— 

10 ‘‘(1) property is transferred to a corporation 

11 (hereinafter in this subsection referred to as the 

12 ‘controlled corporation’) pursuant to a plan of reor13 ganization described in section 368(a)(1)(D), and 

14 ‘‘(2) pursuant to such plan of reorganization, 

15 stock or securities in the controlled corporation are 

16 distributed in a transaction which qualifies under 

17 section 355, 

18 then any securities and nonqualified preferred stock (as 

19 defined in section 351(g)(2)) of the controlled corporation 

20 shall be treated as other property for purposes of sub21 sections (a) and (b).’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 subsection (a) shall apply to distributions after December 

24 31, 2009. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Jonathan Ells v. Louisa Rector.

*Finding of facts: Circuit judge: Resignation: Nullity. A.*finding of facta made and filed after the judge -who tried the cause had resigned is a nullity.

*JPractiee: Costs.*Whore, however, the plaintiff in error has founded objections upon such findings, and in some respects proceeded as though they were valid, no costs will be allowed in his favor on a reversal upon the ground that the findings are void.

*Heard and decided October 8.*

Error to Berrien Circuit. -

*Edward, Bacon,*for plaintiff in error.

*George S. Clapp,*for defendant in error.

Graves, On. J:

The writ of- error here is brought to reverse a judgment given in the circuit court upon findings by the court where the cause was tried without a jury.

Upon examination of the record it appears that the findings were made and filed after the judge had resigned, and that one of the grounds of error is, that the judgment is not supported by the facts. This ground of .objection is plainly fatal, there being no facts at all to support the judgment, and consequently a reversal is unavoidable.

As it appears, however, that the plaintiff in error has by his practice founded objections upon the findings, and in some respects proceeded as though the findings were not void, we think no costs should be given to either party as against the other, and that the case should be remanded for a new trial-

The other Justices concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4550 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4550

    To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute to 
       political campaigns or participate in lobbying activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2010

 Ms. Tsongas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on House 
   Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute to 
       political campaigns or participate in lobbying activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Taxpayer Money for Corporate 
Campaigns Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CAMPAIGN AND 
              LOBBYING ACTIVITIES.

    With respect to Federal funds received by an entity, other than a 
natural person, it shall be unlawful for such entity to--
            (1) use such funds to advocate the election or defeat of a 
        political candidate;
            (2) use such funds to engage in any lobbying activity; or
            (3) donate such funds to any entity that advocates for the 
        election or defeat of a political candidate or engages in 
        lobbying activities.
                                 <all>
```
#### People v Wilcoxson,

No. 90949;

Court of Appeals No. 134466.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Docket Nos.Route 66 Solar Energy Center, LLC
EG22-1-000Cypress Creek Fund 7 Tenant, LLC
EG22 EG22-2-000Cypress Creek Fund 6 Tenant, LLC
EG22 EG22-3-000Cypress Creek Fund 5 Tenant, LLC
EG22 EG22-4-000CCP-PL Lessee, LLC
EG22 EG22-5-000Hecate Energy Highland LLC
EG22 EG22-6-000EnerSmart Chula Vista BESS LLC
EG22 EG22-7-000Sagebrush Line, LLC
EG22 EG22-8-000PGR 2021 Lessee 2, LLC
EG22 EG22-9-000Beulah Solar, LLC
EG22 EG22-10-000Ellis Solar, LLC
EG22 EG22-11-000King Creek Wind Farm 1 LLC
EG22 EG22-12-000King Creek Wind Farm 2 LLC
EG22 EG22-13-000Calhoun Solar Energy LLC
EG22 EG22-14-000ENGIE 2020 ProjectCo-NH1 LLC
EG22 EG22-15-000Dunns Bridge Solar Center, LLC
EG22 EG22-16-000Jackson Generation, LLC
EG22 EG22-17-000MPH AL Pierce, LLC
EG22 EG22-18-000
 Take notice that during the month of December 2021, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a)(2021). Dated: January 7, 2022. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Deputy Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2022-00618 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Solomon FELDMAN Jr. *v.*STATE BOARD of LAW EXAMINERS

73-307

507 S.W. 2d 508

Opinion delivered April 8, 1974

*Solomon Feldman Jr.,*pro se, for petitioner.

*Robert L. Rogers II,*for respondent.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Following our opinion in *Feldman*v. *Arkansas State Board of Law Examiners,*250 Ark. 286, 464 S.W. 2d 789 (1971), petitioner was again permitted to take the bar exam. He again failed. Also following the above decision tl^is Court entered a per curiam order permitting graduates of the then defunct Arkansas Law School to take the bar exam at any one of the next three examinations to be given by the State Board of Law Examiners, but not thereafter. That time too has elapsed. Petitioner, Solomon Feldman, Jr., now asks that he be given one more chance to take the bar examination. He does so on the ground that the court should create an exception for him one more time or that the court should remove the rule.

*385The validity of the rule revoking the approval of the Arkansas Law School as an accredited law school by virtue of our previous decision, *supra,*has now become the law of the case and consequently will not be reconsidered. Neither do we see why we should make another exception in favor of petitioner. In overruling the board in *Feldman*v. *Arkansas State Board of Law Examiners, supra,*we. in an effort not only to be fair but to appear to be fair, gave petitioner every benefit of every doubt. If we should again grant an exception there would be no reason to have the rule.

Consequently, petitioner’s application to take the bar one more time is denied.

Fogleman, J., not participating.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 450 

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United 

States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2009 

Mr. SHADEGG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under 

the United States Constitution for the enactment of laws, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enumerated Powers 

5 Act’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 450 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY 

2 FOR ENACTMENT OF LAW. 

3 (a) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR THIS ACT.— 

4 This Act is enacted pursuant to the power granted Con5 gress under article I, section 8, clause 18, of the United 

6 States Constitution and the power granted to each House 

7 of Congress under article I, section 5, clause 2, of the 

8 United States Constitution. 

9 (b) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT RE10 QUIRED.—Chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is 

11 amended by inserting after section 102 the following new 

12 section: 

13 ‘‘§ 102a. Constitutional authority clause 

14 ‘‘Each Act of Congress shall contain a concise and 

15 definite statement of the constitutional authority relied 

16 upon for the enactment of each portion of that Act. The 

17 failure to comply with this section shall give rise to a point 

18 of order in either House of Congress. The availability of 

19 this point of order does not affect any other available re20 lief.’’ 

21 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

22 at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 1, United States 

23 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to 

24 section 102 the following new item: 

‘‘102a. Constitutional authority clause.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
```
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-32.1
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>hybridexhbit321-093004.txt
<DESCRIPTION>CERTIFICATION OF CEO PER SECTION 906
<TEXT>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

      The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 of Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc.(the "Company")
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                          	s/s MARK CLANCY
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                 Mark Clancy
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 November 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1638

SARAH S. LYON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FREDDIE MAC CORPORATION; ROBERT L. PARSON,

MAI, Director Collateral Quality Assurance;

LISA ROSS, Collateral Quality Assurance

Underwriter; CATHY MOORE, Human Resource

Development,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 99-1834

SARAH S. LYON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FREDDIE MAC CORPORATION; ROBERT L. PARSON,

MAI, Director Collateral Quality Assurance;

LISA ROSS, Collateral Quality Assurance

Underwriter; CATHY MOORE, Human Resource

Development,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-99-32-A)

Submitted: October 26, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sarah S. Lyon, Appellant Pro Se. Lance J. Wolf, FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORPORATION, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s orders are marked as “filed”

on April 12 and May 28, 1999, the district court’s records show

that they were entered on the docket sheet on April 14 and June 1,

1999. It is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet

that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a); Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d

1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

3

PER CURIAM:

In No. 99-1638, Sarah Lyon appeals the district court’s April

14, 1999* order granting the appellees’ motion to dismiss in her

civil action alleging various claims of discrimination in her

employment. In No. 99-1834, Lyon appeals the district court’s

June 1, 1999 order granting the appellees’ motion for summary

judgment on other claims concerning her life insurance benefits.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on

the reasoning of the district court. See Lyon v. Federal Home Loan

Mortgage Corp., No. CA-99-32-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 14 & June 1, 1999).

We deny Lyon’s motions for appointment of counsel and for the court

to take judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 58075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23997]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7590]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Sanja Ivekovi[cacute]: Sweet Violence''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Sanja Ivekovi[cacute]: Sweet Violence,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of 
Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about December 18, 2011, 
until on or about March 26, 2012, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 12, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-23997 Filed 9-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

KARA BROOKS,
Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-84
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF District Judge Walter H. Rice
SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #13), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such
objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and
Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #13) is ADOPTED in full;

2. The Commissioner’s non-disability determination is REVERSED;

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth
Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and

4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

Date: _/- 72-58 Lh Spon

WALTER HERBERT RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND THE  STATEMENT  OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER  31,  1998  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         797977
<NAME>                        PARTICIPATING INCOME PROPERTIES 1986, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           2,202,940
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      212,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                          34,849,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,884,742
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,589,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,010,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,589,017
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,813,299
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,007,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,798,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,798,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,798,859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       111.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information  extracted from the Balance
Sheets for 24 HOUR AUCTION INC. at November 30, 2000 (unaudited) and
the Statement of Operations for the three month period ended  November 30, 2000
(unaudited) and is qualified  in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,442
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,942
<PP&E>                                           4,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,201)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           366
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)








</TABLE>