alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table of
Contents




Exhibit
32.01


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In connection
with the Annual Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Camillo Martino, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented therein.










Date:
      February 12, 2010
            
            
            /s/ Camillo
      MartinoCamillo
      MartinoChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Levy
Gerzberg, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Zoran Corporation; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    LEVY
GERZBERG                 
|Levy Gerzberg                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 2, 2011
AO 470 (Rev. 01/09) Order Scheduling a Detention Hearing 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the 

Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 

United States of America ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

v. Case No. 2:18-mj-97 

Gerald A. Lawson 

Defendant 

ORDER SCHEDULING A DETENTION HEARING

 A detention hearing in this case is scheduled as follows: 

Place: Jos. P. Kinneary United States Courthouse 

85 Marconi Blvd. 

Columbus, OH 43215 

Courtroom No.: 228 

 Date and Time: 2/14/2018 2:45 PM 

IT IS ORDERED: Pending the hearing, the defendant is to be detained in the custody of the United States 

marshal or any other authorized officer. The custodian must bring the defendant to the hearing at the time, date, and 

place set forth above. 

Date: 2/12/2018 /s/ Kimberly A. Jolson 

Judge’s signature

Kimberly A. Jolson, United States Magistrate Judge 

Printed name and title

Case: 2:18-mj-00097-KAJ Doc #: 4 Filed: 02/12/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 8
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer Certification**

 

The certification set forth below is beingsubmitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”)for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

R. Jack DeCrane, the Chief Executive Officerand Richard J. Kaplan, the Chief Financial Officer of DeCrane AircraftHoldings, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;and

 

2.                                       the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings,Inc.

 
| Date: May  14, 2004 |
|---------------------|
|                |
|                |
|                | /s/  R. JACK DECRANE |
|                | R. Jack  DeCrane |
|                | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                |   |
|                |   |
|                | /s/  RICHARD J. KAPLAN |
|                | Richard J.  Kaplan |
|                | Senior Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                | Secretary  and Treasurer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4547 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 395
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4547

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 18, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 119 Station Road in Cheyney, Pennsylvania, as the ``Captain Luther 
             H. Smith, U.S. Army Air Forces Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN LUTHER H. SMITH, U.S. ARMY AIR FORCES POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 119 Station Road in Cheyney, Pennsylvania, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Captain Luther H. Smith, U.S. Army Air Forces 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Luther H. Smith, U.S. Army Air Forces Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 395

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4547

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 119 Station Road in Cheyney, Pennsylvania, as the ``Captain Luther 
             H. Smith, U.S. Army Air Forces Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 18, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
**Exhibit 4(j)**

**FORM OF PERMANENT GLOBAL FLOATING RATE BEARER NOTE**

**GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION**

**BEARER**

**[            ]1**

**[            ]2**

THIS SECURITY IS APERMANENT GLOBAL BEARER NOTE, WITHOUT COUPONS, EXCHANGEABLE FOR THE RIGHTS ATTACHING TO THIS NOTE AND THE CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING ITS EXCHANGE FOR DEFINITIVE BEARER NOTES OR IF SO PROVIDED HEREIN REGISTERED NOTES ARE AS SPECIFIED IN THEFISCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT (AS DEFINED BELOW). 

ANY UNITED STATES PERSON WHO HOLDS THIS OBLIGATION WILL BE SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS UNDER THE UNITED STATESINCOME TAX LAWS, INCLUDING THE LIMITATIONS PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 165(j) AND 1287(a) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. 

UNLESS AND UNTIL IT IS EXCHANGED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR DEFINITIVE BEARER NOTES OR IF SO PROVIDED HEREIN REGISTERED NOTES, THIS GLOBAL NOTE MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT AS A WHOLE BY THE [DEPOSITARY/COMMON SAFE-KEEPER]3 TO A NOMINEE OF THE [DEPOSITARY/COMMON SAFE-KEEPER] OR BY A NOMINEE OF THE [DEPOSITARY/COMMON SAFE-KEEPER] TO THE[DEPOSITARY/COMMON SAFE-KEEPER] OR ANOTHER NOMINEE OF THE [DEPOSITARY/COMMON SAFE-KEEPER] OR BY THE [DEPOSITARY/COMMON SAFE-KEEPER] OR ANY SUCH NOMINEE TO A SUCCESSOR [DEPOSITARY/COMMON SAFE-KEEPER] OR A NOMINEE OF SUCH SUCCESSOR [DEPOSITARY/COMMONSAFE-KEEPER]. 

 

----
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20, 

2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00845-CR

____________

IN RE THOMAS FLORENCE, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

 56th District Court

 Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10CR1217

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On September 29, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. 

See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator

claims his conviction is void due to defects in the charging instrument.

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 governs the procedure for obtaining 

post-conviction relief from a final felony conviction. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 

11.07 (West Supp. 2010). Article 11.07 provides no role for the courts of appeals in this 

process. See id. Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters 

related to post-conviction relief from a final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court 
2

of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 1991); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. 

Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding 

that article 11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction). 

Accordingly, we are without jurisdiction to declare relator’s conviction void and order his 

release. 

Relator's petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB of American
Community Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  | AMERICAN COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 4, 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/     Randy P. Helton            
|                       |  |  |  |     | 
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS D IVISION O NE

S TATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

T ICHINA SHEPHARD , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA- CR 23-0151 PRPC FILED 11 -30-2023

P etition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR2017-005699-002 The Honorable Danielle. J. Viola , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Douglas Gerlach Counsel for Respondent

B rown and Little, PLC, Chandler By Matthew O. Brown C ounsel for PetitionerSTATE v. SHEPHARD Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Andrew M. Jacobs, and Judge Angela K . Paton delivered the decision of the Court

.

PER CURI A M : ¶1 Petitioner Tichina Shephard seeks review of the superior court’s order denying h er petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is h er first petition

. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief

. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 , 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 , P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, the petition for review, and the state’s response

. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.25

                                                            [LOGO]
                                                            SILICON IMAGE, INC.
                                                            10131 Bubb Rd.
                                                            Cupertino, CA 95014
                                                            Ph: (408) 873-3111
                                                            Fax: (408) 873-0446



                                November 18, 1999



Steve Tirado
18052 Center Street
Castro Valley, CA 94546

Re:      FIRST YEAR BONUS

Dear Steve:

         This letter is to confirm our understanding regarding your bonus for
your first year of employment with Silicon Image, Inc. (the "Company").

                  Pursuant the Company's offer letter to you dated June 16,
1999, you are eligible for a special cash bonus of up to $25,000 on the
six-month anniversary of your date of hire and an additional $25,000 on the
one-year anniversary of your date of hire, based on your achieving certain goals
agreed to by you and the Company. Since the date of the offer letter, the
Company has adopted an Executive Bonus Plan for October 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000
(the "Bonus Plan"). You and the Company desire that you, like the other
executives, will be eligible for a bonus under the Bonus Plan if it would exceed
the bonus described in your offer letter. To facilitate this determination and
to transition you to the same compensation schedule as the rest of the Company's
executive management team, you and the Company agree that the second sentence of
the third paragraph of your offer letter will be deleted. Instead, you will be
eligible for a bonus determined after June 30, 2000 as the greater of (a) the
amount due to you under the Bonus Plan, or (b) $45,833 (which is equal to the
$50,000 first-year bonus opportunity described in your offer letter, pro-rated
to reflect the 11 months of full-time employment that you will completed as of
June 30, 2000).

         Please countersign this letter to indicate your agreement with its
terms.

Very truly yours,

Silicon Image, Inc.                               Accepted and agreed:


By:    /s/   David D. Lee                             /s/ Steve Tirado
   ---------------------------------------        ------------------------------
       David D. Lee, President and CEO                Steve Tirado


                                       1
EXHIBIT
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB  Reliant Home Warranty
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, L. Val
Guilis,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  herby certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, to the best of his/her knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

By:  /s/ Val Guilis

-------------------------------------
Val Guilis
Chief Financial Officer

April 12, 2005

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-3247

KEITH JONES, individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PRODUCERS SERVICE CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellant.

Before: GIBBONS, BUSH, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.

THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.

IN CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, and REMANDED for further 

proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk

Case: 2:17-cv-01086-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 136-1 Filed: 03/06/24 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1447
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 8, 2008/s/ RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR., M.D.*Name:
        Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.Title:
        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


*
        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by Genta Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.










---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00691

- CV

Texas Political Subdivision

v. Pharr San Juan Alamo I.S.D.

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No

. 4 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CL

- 13

- 1862

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, h aving considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 9, 2015.
Exhibit
23(ii)








Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








To the
Board of Directors


General
Electric Capital Services, Inc.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-7348) on Form S-3 of General Electric Capital Services, Inc. of our report
dated February 20, 2008, relating to: (i) the statement of financial position of
General Electric Capital Services, Inc. and consolidated affiliates as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, (ii) the related statements of earnings, changes in
shareowner’s equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2007, (iii) the related financial statement schedule,
and (iv) the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report
on Form 10-K of General Electric Capital Services, Inc.  Our report
refers to a change in 2007 in the method of accounting for a change or projected
change in the timing of cash flows relating to income taxes generated by
leveraged lease transactions and, in 2006, for pension and other postretirement
benefits.













/s/ KPMG
LLP


KPMG
LLP


Stamford,
Connecticut


February
20, 2008
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 12

                                 MICROTUNE, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Six Months
                                          Ended June
                                           30, 2002          2001            2000           1999            1998           1997
                                        --------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- --------------
<S>                                     <C>             <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
Loss before provision for income taxes      $ (26,392)      $ (64,373)     $ (29,760)     $  (8,508)      $  (3,487)     $  (2,406)
   Add: Estimate of interest within
          rental expense (1)                       648             755            696             38              21             23
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
              Total loss                    $ (25,744)      $ (63,618)     $ (29,064)     $  (8,470)      $  (3,466)     $  (2,383)
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------

      FIXED CHARGES AND
  PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
  Fixed charges-estimate of interest
      within rental expense (1)             $      648      $      755     $      696     $       38      $       21     $       23
      Preferred stock dividends                     --           --                --             --             811          4,183
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
  Total fixed charges and preferred
           stock dividends                  $      648      $      755     $      696     $       38      $      832     $    4,206
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
Deficiency of total earnings to fixed
               charges                      $ (26,392)      $ (64,373)     $ (29,760)     $  (8,508)      $  (3,487)     $  (2,406)
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
Deficiency of total earnings to fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends       $ (26,392)      $ (64,373)     $ (29,760)     $  (8,508)      $  (4,298)     $  (6,589)
                                            ----------      ----------     ----------     ----------      ----------     ----------
</TABLE>

(1) Fixed charges include the estimated interest component of rent expense
    included in the loss before provision for income taxes.

                                      -23-