alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:17-mj-00586-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 50
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:17-mj-00586-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 51
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

R. Jack DeCrane, as ChiefExecutive Officer of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies that:

 

(1)                      TheCompany’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the“Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                      Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 20, 2003 | By:    | /s/  R. Jack  DeCrane |
|--------------|--------|----------------------------|
|         | Name:  | R. Jack DeCrane            |
|         | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    |

 

**A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toDeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by DeCrane AircraftHoldings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.**

 

**Thiscertification is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commissionsolely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code.  Thiscertification shall not to be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. This certification does not constitute a part of Registrant’s Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q accompanying this certification and to which it is an exhibit.**

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Tammy Napier,
Plaintiff(s),
Case Number: 1:18cv30
vs.
Judge Susan J. Dlott
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant(s).
ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate
Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings
and filed with this Court on June 28, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26). Subsequently,
the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) followed by amended
objections (Doc. 28).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered
de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This case is hereby

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

uta |. wa

Judge Susan J. Dfott
United States District Court
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 459 

For the relief of Alfredo Ramirez Vasquez. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2009 

Mr. PASTOR of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Alfredo Ramirez Vasquez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, OR 

4 DENIAL OF ADMISSION TO, ALFREDO RAMI5 REZ VASQUEZ. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 212(a) 

7 and 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 

8 Alfredo Ramirez Vasquez may not be removed from the 

9 United States, or denied admission to the United States, 

10 by reason of any act of his that is a ground for removal 

11 or denial of admission and is reflected in the records of 

12 the Department of Homeland Security, or the Visa Office 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 459 IH

1 of the Department of State, on the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act. 

3 (b) RESCISSION OF OUTSTANDING ORDER OF RE4 MOVAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall re5 scind any outstanding order of removal, or any finding of 

6 inadmissibility or deportability, that has been entered 

7 against Alfredo Ramirez Vasquez by reason of any act de8 scribed in subsection (a). 

9 (c) ESTABLISHMENT OF GOOD MORAL CHAR10 ACTER.—Notwithstanding section 101(f) of the Immigra11 tion and Nationality Act, any act described in subsection 

12 (a) may not be considered in determining whether Alfredo 

13 Ramirez Vasquez is, or during any period has been, a per14 son of good moral character for purposes of the Immigra15 tion and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 18, 2019

No. 04-19-00432-CR

Donald BRASSFIELD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-1733-CR-A

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

When we granted court reporter Lori Schmid’s first motion for extension of time to file 

the reporter’s record, we set the record due on November 7, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. R. 35.3(c). 

After the extended due date, the court reporter filed a second request for an extension of time to 

file the record until November 27, 2019. 

The reporter’s request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record must be filed with this court 

by November 27, 2019. See id. (limiting any extension in an ordinary appeal to thirty days). 

If the court reporter is unable to file the completed record by November 27, 2019, any 

further request for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written 

status report. 

The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and 

remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of 

pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). 

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any 

problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond 

the requested date. 

The preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached. 
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
No. 99-21085 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-21085 Conference Calendar

FRED FRANKLIN ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus L. A. MASTERS; K. MAXEY; L. ASCHBERGER; V. ZIMA; D. KIMBROUGH, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CV-2243

-------------------- April 14, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Fred Franklin Alexander, Texas prisoner No. 632876, appeals the district court’s determination that his civil rights complaint was frivolous because it was time-barred. The district court record establishes that the complaint was not timely filed. Thus, we find that Alexander’s appeal is legally frivolous and it IS DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of Alexander’s complaint and this court’s dismissal of the appeal as frivolous count as twoNo. 99-21085 -2- “strikes” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.
Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Alexander is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates three “strikes” under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Argued and submitted November 30,

affirmed December 29, 2004

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*MICHELLE RAE HEWITT, *Appellant.*

015612BFE; A122734

103 P3d 654

Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Anne Fujita Munsey, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Maiy H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Doug M. Petrina, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Deits, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Thackaberry,*194 Or App 511, 95 P3d 1142 (2004).
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

## Water Analysis
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 3/8/2012 Sample Number: 120961-001 Date Collected:02/29/2012 08:00 Date Received:2/29/2012 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 384 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 03/06/2012 11:43 

### Sample Number: 120961-002 Date Collected:02/29/2012 08:00 Date Received:2/29/2012 

## 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 27.0 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 03/06/2012 11:48 

### Sample Number: 120961-003 Date Collected:02/29/2012 08:00 Date Received:2/29/2012 

## Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 1.99 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 03/06/2012 11:53

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 120961 Page 1 of 1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J O SE G U A D A LU PE CH A V EZ- LI M A S, aka J ose “ P at o” C havez, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10182 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 7 5 5 - D CB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona D a vi d C . B ury , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose G uadal up e C havez-Limas appeal s f rom the 46 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng hi s c onvi c t i on f orr e - e ntrya f

t e rde port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED MA R 09 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10182 2 C h a v e z - L im a s c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le because the di stri ctcourtfa i l ed t o con si der the age of hi s pri or conv i ct i on un der U ni ted States v. A m ez cua-V asqu ez , 567 F . 3d 1050 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . I n l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t a nc e s a nd the 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) s e nt e nc i ng f a c t or s , the s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e U ni te d State s v . V

ale nc i a- B arr agan , 608 F . 3d 11 03 , 11 08 -09 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( em ph as i zi ng the l i m i t ed sc op e of A m ez c uaV asqu ez ). AF F I RME D.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JAVELEN WOLFE, 

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:17-cv-094 

- vs - District Judge Walter Herbert Rice 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

RHONDA RICHARD, Warden, 

 Madison Correctional Institution, 

 : 

 Respondent. 

TRANSFER ORDER 

 

 This habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the Court on Respondent’s 

Motion to Transfer the case as a second or successive habeas corpus application which requires 

permission from the circuit court before it can proceed (ECF No. 6). 

 A district court has no jurisdiction to consider the merits of a second or successive habeas 

petition. Franklin v. Jenkins, 839 F.3d 465(6th Cir. 2016); Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147 

(2007). However, it is the district court which must decide in the first instance whether a habeas 

application is second or successive. In re: Kenneth Smith, 690 F.3d 809 (6th Cir. 2012); In re 

Sheppard, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13709 (6th Cir. May 25, 2012). 

 Mr. Wolfe in the instant case is challenging his conviction and imprisonment under the 

same judgment he previously attacked in Wolfe v. Warden, No. 3:09-cv-442. This Court entered 

final judgment dismissing that case with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Wolfe 

v. Warden, 2010 WL 552130 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 6, 2010). The only changes to the underlying 

judgment have been nunc pro tunc entries correcting or adding the statutory reference and 
2 

include the jail time credit. These amendments do not create changes in the judgment sufficient 

to allow a second-in-time habeas application to be counted as if it were an original application. 

Compare Crangle v. Kelly, 838 F.3d 673, 680 (6th Cir. 2016). 

 Accordingly, the Warden’s Motion is GRANTED and it is hereby ORDERED that the 

Clerk transfer this case to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for its determination of whether Mr. 

Wolfe’s instant Petition should be permitted to proceed. 

May 22, 2017. 

 s/ Michael R. Merz

 United States Magistrate Judge
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4395 

To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to include 

the Gettysburg Train Station, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. PLATTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military 

Park to include the Gettysburg Train Station, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GETTYSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK 

4 BOUNDARY REVISION. 

5 Section 1 of the Act titled ‘‘An Act to revise the 

6 boundary of the Gettysburg National Military Park in the 

7 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and for other purposes’’, 

8 approved August 17, 1990 (16 U.S.C. 430g–4), is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following: 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4395 IH

1 ‘‘(d) ADDITIONAL LAND.—In addition to the land 

2 identified in subsections (a) and (b), the park shall also 

3 include the following: 

4 ‘‘(1) Property commonly known as the Gettys5 burg Train Station and its immediate surroundings, 

6 in the Borough of Gettysburg as depicted on the 

7 map titled ‘Gettysburg National Military Park, Pro8 posed Boundary’, numbered 305/80,045, and dated 

9 September 2008, and 

10 ‘‘(2) Property located along Plum Run in Cum11 berland Township as depicted on the map titled 

12 ‘Gettysburg National Military Park, Proposed 

13 Boundary Addition’, numbered 305/80,046, and 

14 dated February 2009.’’. 

15 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF LAND. 

16 Section 2 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 430g–5) is amended 

17 by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following: 

18 ‘‘The Secretary is also authorized to acquire publicly 

19 owned property within the area defined in section 1(d)(1) 

20 by purchase, from willing sellers only, if efforts to acquire 

21 that property without cost have been exhausted. The Sec22 retary may not acquire property within the area defined 

23 in section 1(d) by eminent domain.’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### People v Boyer,

No. 90863;

Court of Appeals No. 97779.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         724,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    753,917
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,899,583
<PP&E>                                       1,849,185
<DEPRECIATION>                               (496,500)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,439,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          674,520
<BONDS>                                        104,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,871
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,640,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,439,139
<SALES>                                        917,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               917,705
<CGS>                                          792,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  792,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,742,787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,527,918)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,527,918)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,527,918)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4362 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4362

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
              remediation payments for hazardous drywall.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

   Mr. Cao introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
              remediation payments for hazardous drywall.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAZARDOUS DRYWALL REMEDIATION PAYMENT EXCLUDED FROM GROSS 
              INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after section 
139C the following new section:

``SEC. 139D. HAZARDOUS DRYWALL REMEDIATION PAYMENTS.

    ``Gross income shall not include any payment received from the 
Federal a State or local government for the replacement of, or 
remediation relating to, hazardous or defective drywall installed in 
the principal residence (within the meaning of section 121) of the 
taxpayer after September 1, 2006, and before the date of the enactment 
of this Act.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part III of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 139C the following new item:

``139D. Hazardous drywall remediation payments.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments received after ____________.
                                 <all>
```