alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




I, William S. Hummers III, the Executive Vice President and Principal Financial
Officer of The South Financial Group, Inc. ("TSFG") certify that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the annual report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 of TSFG (the "Report"):


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         TSFG.


/s/ William S. Hummers III
William S. Hummers III
Executive Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
The South Financial Group, Inc.
March 10, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to The South Financial Group, Inc.
and will be retained by The South Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 584 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 584

To constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for 
   the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, or until their successors are 
                                chosen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2020

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for 
   the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, or until their successors are 
                                chosen.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the following committee for the One Hundred Sixteenth 
Congress, or until their successors are chosen:
    Select Committee on Intelligence:  Mr. Rubio (Chair), Mr. Burr, Mr. 
Risch, Ms. Collins, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Sasse.
                                 <all>
```
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 28 91

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Dav id Hol id ay
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__

__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - Sp rin gf ie ld

__

__ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Apri l 1 5, 2 01 9 Fi le d: Apri l 2 9, 2 01 9 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, GRUEND ER, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.D a vi d Hol id ay ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s or de r co m m it ti ng hi m un de r 1 8 1 U.S.C. § 42 45 , whi ch pr ov id es fo r ho sp it a l i zat io n an d tre at m en t of an im pr is on ed pe rs on su ffer in g fro m a m en ta l di se as e or de fect , un ti l he no lo ng er need s trea tm en t

or hi s pr is on se nt en ce ex pi res , whi ch ev er oc cu rs fir st

. Upo n care fu l rev ie w of t h e
reco rd --i nc lu di ng th e ps y ch ol og ic al ev al ua ti on s of m en ta l he alth pr ofes si on al s whe re Hol id ay is pr es en tl y co nf in ed fo r tre at m en t, an d of de fen se c o u n s el ’s in de pe nd en t ps y ch ol og ic al ex am in er-- we co nc lu de th e di st ric t co ur t’s se ct io n 42 4 5 fin di ng was
su pp or te d by a pr ep on de ran ce of th e ev id en ce, an d was no t cl earl y erro ne ou s. See 18 U.S.C. § 42 45 (d ); Uni te d St at es v. Bea n, 37 3 F.3 d 87 7, 87 9 ( 8 t h C i r

. 20 04 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w). W e al so co nc lu de th at Hol i d a y’s pr o se arg um en ts of fer no ba si s fo r rel ie f.

The jud gm en t of th e di st ric t co ur t is affi rm ed , an d co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd raw i s g ran te d.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le M. Dou gl as Harp oo l , U n i t ed St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco mm e n d a t i on s of th e Hon or ab le Dav id P. Ru sh , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri.
-2

-
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                     --------------------------------------

         I, L. Kirk  Boyd,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Dialex  Minerals  Inc.,
hereby certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB of Dialex
Minerals Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4.  I  am  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and I have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  (c) presented in this quarterly  report my  conclusions  about
the  effectiveness  of  the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on my
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I  have  disclosed,  based  on my  most  recent  evaluation,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and to the  audit  committee  of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal  controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  (b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,   that  involves
management or other  employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's
internal controls; and

         6. I have indicated in this quarterly  report whether or not there were
significant  changes  in  internal  controls  or in  other  factors  that  could
significantly  affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation,   including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 28, 2003

/s/  L. Kirk Boyd
-------------------------------
By: L. Kirk Boyd,
Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### Ray D. PETTY *v.*D. A. CLARKE, Probate Judge and W. S. ARNOLD, Special Probate Judge

73-309

507 S.W. 2d 700

Opinion delivered April 15, 1974

*Clifton Bond,*for petitioner.

No brief for respondents.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The sole issue on this petition for writ of prohibition is whether a special judge can be elected by the attending lawyers pursuant to Ark. Stat. Annf. § 22-436 (Repl. 1962), to hear a probate matter upon the disqualification of the regular chancellor.

Following the reversal and remand of the chancery proceeding in *McDonald, Executrix*v. *Ray Dale Petty,*254 Ark. 705, 496 S.W. 2d 365 (1973), petitioner Ray D. Petty filed a petition for probate of an alleged holographic will. The regular chancellor, The Honorable D. A. Clarke, who, before *413his election to his present position, had represented some of the parties, notified the clerk to hold an election among the attending lawyers for the purpose of electing a special judge to hear and determine the issues raised by the petition to probate the alleged holographic will. Respondent W. S. Arnold was elected special judge by the lawyers in attendance.

In contending that there is no Constitutional or statutory provision for the election of a special judge by the attorneys in attendance, Mr. Petty asserts that the selection of a special judge to hear a probate matter is controlled by Article 7 § 36 of the Arkansas Constitution, which provides:

> “§ 36. Special judges of county or probate courts. — Whenever a judge of the county or probate court may be disqualified from presiding in any cause or causes pending in his court, he shall certify the facts to the Governor of the State, who shall thereupon commission a special judge to preside in such cause or causes during the time said disqualification may continue, or until such cause or causes may be fully disposed of.”(1)

However, we do not find Art. 7 § 36 to be controlling, because the people of this State subsequently adopted Constitutional Amendment No. 24, § 1 which provides:

> “In each county the Judge of the court having jurisdiction in matters of equity shall be the judge of the court of probate, ...”

Subsection No. 4 of Amendment No. 24 repealed all parts of the Constitution of the State of Arkansas in conflict therewith. Consequently, the judge who was disqualified was not the probate judge but “the judge of the court having jurisdiction in matters of equity.” When viewed from the provisions of Amendment No. 24 it at once becomes apparent that the election was for the purpose of electing a special chancellor as authorized by Ark. Stat. Ann. § 22-436 (Repl. 1962), because there can be no separate “judge of probate.”

It therefore follows that the petition for writ of prohibition should be denied.

(1)

 Before adoption of Amendment 24, the county judge was also the judge of the probate court, Ark. Constitution 1874, Art. 7 § 34.
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
OF PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premiere Global Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, Boland T. Jones, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|

| | /s/ Boland T. Jones           
| | ------------------------------
| | Boland T. Jones               
| | Chief Executive Officer       
| | Premiere Global Services, Inc.
| | May 10, 2007                  

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

:

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17MJ0088

:

-vs- : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

AUSTIN KEVIN ALIG, :

:

Defendant.

BINDOVER ORDER

This matter was set for preliminary examination on March 31, 2017. Defendant

appeared with counsel and waived his right to a preliminary examination. The Court

found the waiver to be knowing and voluntary and therefore orders that Defendant be

bound over to the grand jury to answer the charge.

April 4, 2017 s/ Sharon L. Ovington 

Sharon L. Ovington

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 3:17-mj-00088-SLO Doc #: 9 Filed: 04/04/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 28
\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5362684 v2

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

+1.202.637.5600 Tel

+1.202.637.5910 Fax

Robert E. Cohn, Partner

202.637.4999

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

January 27, 2014

Susan Kurland

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Joint Notice of Republic Airline, Shuttle America, and Chautauqua Airlines

(Dockets DOT-OST-1999-6240 and 2013-0086)

Dear Assistant Secretary Kurland:

The Unauthorized Sur-Reply of Southwest Airlines Co. and JetBlue Airways, Inc., dated

January 24, 2014, adds nothing new that requires a response and ignores the importance of

continuing DCA nonstop service to Madison and Omaha.

Republic Airline Inc., Shuttle America Corporation, and Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. urge

the Department to act promptly on the request to use the three slot slide exemptions, so that the

important needs of these communities for nonstop DCA service can continue to be met.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert E. Cohn

Patrick R. Rizzi

Counsel for Republic Airline Inc., Shuttle America

Corporation, and Chautauqua Airlines, Inc.

cc: Bryan Bedford, Ethan Blank

cc: bob.kneisley@wnco.com; marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com; robert.wirick@aa.com;

francis.heil@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; jhill@cooley.com; jyoung@yklaw.com;

dkirstein@yklaw.com; dan.weiss@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com;

Thomas.Ting@suncountry.com; howard_kass@usairways.com; benjamin.slocum@usairways.com;

anita.mosner@hklaw.com; barbara.russell@virginamerica.com; cindy.baraban@dot.gov;

Kevin.Schlemmer@dot.gov; Dennis.DeVany@dot.gov; Rob.Hawks@faa.gov
EXHIBIT 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-88543, 333-95713, 333-35738, 333-44768, 333-61218,
333-63900, 333-67730 and 333-86324) and Form S-3 (No. 333-62724) of Silicon Image, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 2002, except as to Note 11, which is as of
February 26, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
San Jose, California
July 12, 2002

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00902]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Board Meeting

SUMMARY: Notice of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Board of 
Directors of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC), is 
hereby given in accordance with the provisions of Article VI of the 
Bylaws of the FCSIC.

Time and Date:  10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 27, 2022.

Place: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the public may only virtually 
attend the open portions of this meeting. If you would like to 
virtually attend, at least 24 hours in advance, visit FCSIC.gov, select 
``News & Events,'' and then select ``Board Meetings.'' From there, 
access the linked ``Instructions for board meeting visitors.''

Status:  Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

Matters To be Considered: 

Portions Open to the Public

<bullet> Approval of December 8, 2021 Minutes
<bullet> Review and Setting of Insurance Premium Rates
<bullet> Policy Statement--Insurance Premiums
<bullet> Policy Statement--Internal Controls, Audit Coverage & 
Committee Charter

Portions Closed to the Public

<bullet> Annual Report on Contracts
<bullet> Annual Report on Whistleblower Activity

For More Information Contact:  If you need more information, need 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley 
Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-
4056.

    Dated: January 12, 2022.
Ashley Waldron,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-00902 Filed 1-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION

RODNEY PATE,

 

 Plaintiff,

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-257-MHW-CMV

JUDGE MICHAEL H. WATSON

MAG. JUDGE CHELSEY M. 

VASCURA

JURY DEMAND

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Plaintiff hereby gives notice that the above-captioned case is voluntarily 

dismissed against the Defendant with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Dated: August 1, 2018 

By: s/ Jonathan Hilton

Jonathan Hilton (0095742)

HILTON PARKER LLC

10400 Blacklick-Eastern Rd NW, Suite 110

Pickerington, OH 43147

Tel: (614) 992-2277

Fax: (614) 427-5557

jhilton@hiltonparker.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jonathan Hilton, Esq., do hereby certify that on August 1, 2018, I caused true 

and correct copies of the above to be served via the CM/ECF filing system, which will 

cause service upon all counsel of record.

By: s/ Jonathan Hilton

Case: 2:18-cv-00257-MHW-CMV Doc #: 9 Filed: 08/01/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 23
AFS-15-1064-E December 10, 2015

Mr. John Cudahy

President

International Council of Air Shows 748 Miller Drive SE, Suite G-3 Leesburg, VA 20175

Mr. Bill Fischer

Executive Director Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) Warbirds of America 3000 Poberezny Road Oshkosh, WI 54902

Dear Mr. Cudahy and Mr. Fischer:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption, and explains why we cannot process your request for an exemption, from § 91.319(c) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

You entered your petition for exemption on March 26, 2015, into public docket (No. FAA2015-0809) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of the International Council of Air Shows (ICAS) a nd the Warbirds of America (EAA) for an exemption from 14 CFR § 91.319(c). That exemp tion, if granted, would provide broad relief that would permit ICAS/EAA members to conduct overflights of various stadiums and sporting events in aircraft having experimental certificates.

14 CFR § 91.319(c) in part states that:

“...no person may operate an aircraft that has an experimental certificate over a densely populated area or in a congested airway. The Administrator may issue special operating limitations for particular aircraft to permit takeoffs and landings to be conducted over a densely populated area or in a congested airway, in accordance with terms and conditions specified in the authorization in the interest of safety in air

commerce.”2

The FAA considers a stadium or sporting event to be an open air assembly of people subject to regulation under § 91.119(b). Many stadiums and sporting events, however, will also be located around a densely populated area. In such cases, ingress, egress, and holding paths for stadium flyover events involving experimental ai rcraft would require an exemption from § 91.319. The FAA does not have sufficient information about each flyover event (e.g. aircraft to be used, stadium to be overflown, geographical area surrounding the stadium) to know whether a particular flyover would involve flight over a densely populated area, your petition for exemption provides insufficient information upon which the FAA could base a grant of exemption. A grant of exemption is an individualized assessment that involves a determination that an equivalent level of safety to that provided under the regulations can be maintained. Without specific information about each intended flyover event, the FAA cannot

make this assessment.

In consideration of the forgoing, the FAA will take no further action on your request for exemption from 14 CFR § 91.319(c), and will close the docket on the petition. If you have any questions, you may call TJ Leahy, at (202) 267-0861.

Sincerely,

//s//

James M. Crotty Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division Office of Rulemaking
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,883,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,912,544
<PP&E>                                          38,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,989)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,119,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          869,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,024,778
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,343,702)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,119,272
<SALES>                                      1,480,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,480,215
<CGS>                                          432,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  625,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                837,916
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            826,416
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   826,416
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-127354,333-107988, 333-101828, 333-74610, 333-59843, 333-37111,333-49350, 333-52598 and 333-20225) of Zoran Corporation ofour report dated April 19, 2007 relating to the financial statements, andmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPSan Jose, California

April 19, 2007

----