alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4519 

To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to make publicly available on the 

Internet the electronic communications of certain TARP recipients. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2010 

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to make publicly 

available on the Internet the electronic communications 

of certain TARP recipients. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Crisis Public 

5 Disclosure Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. 

7 Not later than 120 days after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall make 

9 publicly available on the Internet the electronic commuVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:10 Jan 27, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4519.IH H4519

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4519 IH

1 nications of certain employees at large TARP-recipient 

2 firms. 

3 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

4 For purposes of this Act: 

5 (1) CERTAIN EMPLOYEES.—The term ‘‘certain 

6 employees’’ means a firm’s officers, directors, and 

7 those employees of the firm engaged in the trading 

8 or selling of derivatives, securities, or swaps. 

9 (2) ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION.—The term 

10 ‘‘electronic communication’’ means e-mail and at11 tached files whose subject matter concerns activities 

12 related in any way to the current financial and eco13 nomic crisis in the United States (within the scope 

14 of the meaning of such term as used in section 5 of 

15 the Fraud Enforcement Recovery Act of 2009), in16 cluding communications related to the structuring, 

17 trading, sale, or other use of complex financial in18 struments like swaps, structured finance trans19 actions, and other derivatives. 

20 (3) LARGE TARP-RECIPIENT FIRMS.—The term 

21 ‘‘large TARP-recipient firms’’ means a company— 

22 (A) that received assistance under the 

23 Troubled Asset Relief Program under title I of 

24 the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 

25 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5211 et seq.); and 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4519 IH

1 (B) that has more than $60,000,000,000 

2 of such assistance outstanding on the date that 

3 the Financial Crisis Public Disclosure Act of 

4 2010 was introduced in the House of Rep5 resentatives. 

6 (4) PUBLICLY AVAILABLE.—The term ‘‘publicly 

7 available’’ means available to the general public free 

8 of charge on a Web site that allows for the commu9 nications subject to this Act to be used in a format 

10 that is easily searchable and manipulable. 

11 SEC. 4. PRIVACY EXEMPTION. 

12 An electronic communication is exempt from the dis13 closure requirements under section 2 if such communica14 tion is of a purely personal nature or would otherwise be 

15 privileged. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rob-Roy J. Graham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ ROB-ROY J. GRAHAM  
|Rob-Roy J. Graham      
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date: August 4, 2004
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. fAA-

\

5 -eE oo? ~0 Directorate Identifier: -A.}O 

Acid !he work lw11rs. pari.\ cost. and m tmher <?l C.S. regi.wert•d pmd11c1s to tin· w ble he/ow. When yo11 are 

jinished. dick flll lhe ""0/}(/ate Field'i ·· hullolllo autmnatkul~\· fi/1 i11 tlte tolals. 

Update Fields ., 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft. engine, 

(e.g .. Inspection. propeller. appliance) 

rcplaccmem) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

Do not inclucle on- (include cost (labor+ u.s. l()r U.S. Fleet 

condition costs here access, testing. (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection to 

determine if 

placard if existing 0.5 $0.00 3000 

is compliant with 

SB intent 

Order and install 

replacement 1.0 $40.00 3000 

placard 

Order updated POll 

and install updated 0.5 $300.00 3000 

pages 

I 

lo 

The known number of products in como I iance: Unknown 

Total Costs of comoliancc for U.S. fleet: $1,530.000 

Costs covered under warranty (if/mown) so 

8 
On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Special considerations 

that was assumed or might 

for 

not 

Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

he obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a .. significant regulatory action""? @ 

YES* 0 NO !81 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? @ 

YI::S* 0 NO !81 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer . • 

YES 0 NO !81 

Explanation: Will not have a significant impact dut: to low cost for compliance. 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? G 

YES* 0 NO !81 

*Explanation: 

9
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Gary Siegel, Vice President,
Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:   
May 12,
2009





/s/ GARY SIEGEL*Name:
              Gary
      SiegelTitle:
              Vice
      President, Finance





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by Genta Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
ex4-8_f20f12312009.htm


 



 


 


Exhibit 4.8







Summary of Construction Contract with Shanghai Kai Tian Construction







One September 29 2009, Shanghai Jinpan Electric Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with Shanghai Kai Tian Construction (Group) Co. Ltd. (the “General Contractor”) for the construction of two factory buildings and three employee dormitory buildings in the Company’s Shanghai facility.







According to the Agreement, the General Contractor agrees to commence Work on the two factory buildings and one dormitory building on September 29, 2009.   Work on the two factory buildings is scheduled to be completed by December 25, 2009.  Work on one of the dormitory building is scheduled to be completed by January 25, 2010.  Work on the remaining two dormitory buildings is scheduled to be completed within 115 calendar days of the commencement date of the construction (to be determined by the Company).







The total price of Agreement is RMB 10.5 million inclusive of labor and materials (except that for the construction of the steel frame of the two factory buildings).  The parties agreed on the payment term and schedule for the portion of total price attributed to the construction of the two factory buildings and one dormitory building or RMB 4.77 million.  Payment terms and schedules for the two dormitory buildings would be negotiated when the Company set a commencement date for the construction of the two dormitories.







Within 10 calendar days of signing the Agreement, the Company will make an initial payment of 30% of the RMB 4.77 million contract price for the construction of two factory buildings and one dormitory building.  Thereafter, the Company will make monthly progress payments to the General Contractor equal to 45% of the price of work completed within the first 25 calendar days of the month.  The initial payment will be credited against monthly progress payments due.  Upon completion of construction, the Company will pay to the General Contractor the balance of 85% of the RMB 4.77 million price.   Upon receipt of the Construction Final Inspection Certificate, the Company will pay to the General Contractor the balance of 95% of the RMB 4.77 million price. The remaining five percent (5%) of the RMB 4.77 million price is held as warranty security and payable to the General Contractor two years after the inspection and acceptance of the building.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

###### National Endowment for the Arts

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Arts.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given that 1 meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference or videoconference.

# DATES:

                        See the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section for individual meeting times and dates. All meetings are Eastern time and ending times are approximate:                    

# ADDRESSES:

National Endowment for the Arts, Constitution Center, 400 7th St. SW, Washington, DC 20506.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Sherry Hale, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506;                         *hales@arts.gov,*                         or call 202/682-5696.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of September 10, 2019, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title 5, United States Code.

The upcoming meeting is:

*Creative Forces (Capacity Component) Cooperator (review of applications):*                     This meeting will be closed.                

*Date and time:*                     January 28, 2022, 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                

Dated: January 12, 2022.

Sherry Hale,

Staff Assistant, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 2022-00780 Filed 1-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James A. Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JAMES A. FONTAINE                                              
|James A. Fontaine                                                  
|Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: April 23, 2009
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ERIC MITCHELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-2667

[August 15, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Daniel A. Casey, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 19-

010544CF10A; 20-004306CF10A; 20-005202CF10A; 22-003469CF10A;

and 22-006975CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CPSM Exhibit 10.1

  Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is more than an expression of our commitment to integrity. It represents the guiding values of our organization and helps to instill ethically sound behavior and accountability among all CPSM Employees. We diligently educate employees about our standards, safety procedures, technical advances and provide them with an open door policy to ask questions or report concerns. Every employee, including me, certifies compliance with our standards annually. We hold one another accountable because we understand that our reputation is fundamental to our success and your enjoyment.  
 We believe that you want to conduct business with an organization that values honesty and integrity, not only because the law requires it, but also because it is the right thing to do. At CPSM, our ethical standards have always been set higher than the law requires. We are proud of our ethical heritage and I am personally committed to maintaining these same high standards in the years to come.
 Lawrence Calarco
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Premier Exhibitions, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2009, (the Report), each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to such officers knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christopher J. Davino                    
|Christopher J. Davino                        
|Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 6, 2009                                  
|                                             
|/s/ Kelli L. Kellar                          
|Kelli L. Kellar                              
|Chief Accounting Officer                     
|(Acting Chief Financial Officer)             
|May 6, 2009                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23





                         Consent of Independent Auditors




The Board of Directors
National Bankshares, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-79979
on Form S-8 of National Bankshares,  Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2000,
relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheet of National  Bankshares,  Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
income and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998,  which report is included in the
December 31, 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc.

                                    KPMG LLP

Roanoke, Virginia
March 30, 2001
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
THOMAS TAYLOR, JR.,
Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-23

VS.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.

ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD
OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”)
(DOC. 21); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $2,831.00 IN EAJA FEES

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint
stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees and costs under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $2,831.00. Doc. 21.
Based upon the parties’ stipulation in which they present no dispute that all requirements are met
for the reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties’ joint stipulation
(doc. 21); and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees and costs in the amount of $2,831.00. As no
further matters remain pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s
docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: //-&~-L& LAL Coles.

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: August 8 , 2012 TO: RI CE NESHAP Docket, EPA - HQ - OAR - 2008 - 0708 FROM: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG SUBJECT: August 8 , 2012 Meeting Regarding Proposed Amendments to the RI CE NESHAP **SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on August 8 , 2012 to discuss the proposed amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines . The amendments were proposed on June 7, 2012. **ATTENDEES** Joe Goffman , EPA John Flumerfelt, Calpine Robert Wayland , EPA (by phone) Yvonne McIntyr e, Calpine Melanie King, EPA (b y phone) Michael Bradley , MJ Bradley & Associates Stacy Angel , EPA Kathleen Robertson, MJ Bradley & Associates John Citrolo, PSEG Kimberly Scarborough, PSEG
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 9 - 0454 THERON JAMES BLAKE ,

Petitioner and Ap pellant , v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 27 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening bri ef on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 19 2020

03/19/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0454
#### Tate *v.*Paul Revere Fire Insurance Company.

4-8677

216 S. W. 2d 385

Opinion delivered January 10, 1949.

*Troy W. Lewis,*for appellant.

*McMillen*& *Teague,*for appellee.

G-rifein Smith, Chief Justice.

A combination automobile policy was issued severally by The Paul Revere Fire Insurance Company and The Home Indemnity Company. The Home agreed with B. E. Tate that it would pay on his behalf all sums the assured became obligated for by reason of liability imposed upon him by law *“ .*. . for damages . . . because of bodily injury . . . sustained by any person . . . caused by accident and arising out of the . . . use of the [identified] automobile.”

It is stipulated that the car was accidentally upset while being driven by Tate, and that his wife, as guest within the meaning of Act 61 of 1935, was injured. Medical bills amounting to $409.05 were incurred and paid by Tate. Mrs. Tate’s enforced absence from the husband’s mercantile establishment necessitated employment of a clerk, who was paid $192 for services the wife would have rendered. Judgment for $601.50 with penalty and an attorney’s fee was asked by Tate on the theory that his common law liability for the items in question and payment to avoid a multiplicity of suits disclosed pecuniary damage distinct from coverage excluded by Act 61.

We do not discuss the effect of appellee’s plea that by policy provisions recovery does not lie “ . . . until the amount of the insured’s obligation to pay shall have *398been finally established, either by judgment against the assured after actual trial or by written agreement of the assured,, claimant and the Company.” The stipulation is that all services in the demand for $601.50 were necessary, and that Tate had paid them.

Act 61 denies a cause of action to any person transported as a guest in any automotive vehicle upon the public highways unless the vehicle is willfully and wantonly operated. • Since the person admitted here to have been a guest is not suing, appellant thinks his demand rests upon a contractual obligation not expressly or by necessary implication excluded by the statute.

We think the trial Court correctly held, in effect, that appellant’s claim to reimbursement was dependent upon Mrs. Tate’s right to maintain a claim against her husband. It is true appellant was pecuniarily damaged, but Act 61 must be read into indemnifying policies. A clear purpose of the legislation was to protect the insurer against claims arising in the circumstances here shown.

Affirmed.
Case: 3:18-cr-00016-TMR Doc #: 33 Filed: 01/29/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 83
Case: 3:18-mj-00053-SLO Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/09/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 72