alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S I 0-1 00326-008 From:RAPIO CITY AIRPORT 6053946190 03/24/2010 15:22 

iV'PI ldr.,. or: RAPHD CITY REGIONAL I

IRPORT 

www.tapairport.org 

March 24. 20 J0 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington. DC 20590 

Docket DOT .OST·20 I0-_ 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express (my/our) support for the application for antitrust 

immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. 

The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to compete effectively 

with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interamancc competition wiJI jn tum enhance 

the !>eneflts ofthe Department's Open Skies policy - first by solidifyina U;S••Japan Open Skies, 

then by serving as a foundation for further liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review. (Vwo) encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this 

application as it would enable these oneworJd alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver 

highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AAIJAL alliance will have a 

positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service. scheduling and pricing options 

and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having three competitive air 

alJiances to choose from. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Cameron D. Humphres 


Rapid City Regional Airport 


4550 Terminal Rd. Suite J02 


Rapid City SO 57703 


eameron.humhres@rcgov.org 


._----_._---_. -------.-~-------. 4S50 TtRMINAL ROAD. SUITE 102 " RAPID CllY " SOUTH DAKOTA S7703·fl706 • 6QS·394·419!l",!,a - 605· 394·6U'O!,H

---_.._.._.. _---._--........- ..... -....... ----.-.--.-~-.-,.-.------......---..... , ......--..~-.. ...... ...~-...­

f'E -&cz
#### Wilson *v.*Wilkins.

Opinion delivered March 3, 1930.

*138*II. G. May*and *A. F. Smith,*for appellant.

*Evans & Evans,*for appellee.

Hart,-C. J.,

(after stating the facts). According to ■Blackstone, the- absolute rights of each individual are defined to be the right of personal security, the right of per*139sonal liberty, and the right of private property. 3 Cooley, Bl. Com. *119.

According to the allegations of the complaint and the testimony of appellee, there was a willful intimidation of his right of personal security and right of private property by causing him to leave his home by threats and intimidation. This was an actionable wrong. Counsel for appellants concede this to be true, but they seek a reversal of the judgment on the ground that the court erred in allowing plaintiff to recover for mental suffering which was unaccompanied by any physical injury. They rely upon the rule announced in *St. L. I. M. & S. Rd. Co.*v. *Taylor,*84 Ark. 42, 104 S. W. 551, 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 159, and other cases, where we have held, that, in actions for negligence, there can be no mental suffering where there has been no physical injury.

The rule is well settled in this State, but it has no application to willful and wanton wrongs, and those committed with the intention of causing mental distress and injured feelings. Mental suffering forms the proper element of damages in actions for willful and wanton wrongs and those committed with the intention of causing mental distress.

According to the evidence for appellee, the very object of the words spoken in the present case was to cause him mental anxiety and thereby compel him to leave his home and farm, and this was precisely what he said he did do. In the case at bar, the mental suffering was the result of the wrongful acts of appellants against ap-pellee; and, even though there was no physical injury, the courts generally hold that such mental suffering may be taken into consideration in assessing the damages for the wrong. In cases like this the mental suffering was the natural and proximate consequence of the willful wrong which was the basis of the action. *Kline*v. *Kline,*158 Ind. 602, 64 N. E. 9, 58 L. R. A. 397; *Spade*v. *Lynn & Boston Rd. Co.,*168 Mass. 285, 47 N. E. 88, 38 L. R. A. 512; *Davis*v. *Tacoma Railway & Power Co.,*35 Wash. *140203, 77 Pac. 209, 66 L. R. A. 802; *Lonergan*v. *Small,*81 Kan. 48, 105 Pac. 27, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 976; 17 C. J. 831; and 8 R. C. L. 531.

This rule has been expressly recognized and applied by this court in *Lyons*v. *Smith,*176 Ark. 728, 3 S. W. (2d) 982. In that case, plaintiff by threats and intimida.tion was prevented from growing and cultivating his land, and the court held that, the evidence having showed that a willful and wanton wrong had been committed against her, the trial court properly submitted the question of mental suffering, although it was unaccompanied by physical injury.

No other assignment of error is argued, and the judgment will be affirmed.
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- ZOC (...-] - 0 7 5 .5 -AD Zo Jt-f-AtM-0 <jQ-A-D 

J(yo11111okC' clu1117,es to the ,·a/ues in //1e tuhle helo,r. you 11111s1 en.rnre //w totals 11w)aw occ:urcli11gly (l 

Directorate ldenti ft er: 

1/iey do nut, dick (or 'fi,hJ into u11d lh1!11 0111 <?/the du111g<1d cdf. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance) (e.g., Inspection, Work-hours Labor Pans Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

replacement) (include cost (labor + U.S. for U.S. Fleet Do 1101 i11c/11de 011-

co11di1io11 c:osls here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Prod ucts 

Inspection for 

motor operated 1.0 ..... ' } $0 2, 140 

valve actuators 

,J j 

~nl.., .. At'\-- (ij,r ~ 5JMYMI"' 

' ,,,,\A,{..,. ' ( ) /1 ·t-o x~ I 

v;::..... \ ' ,)./"(. ~ -/' .-, 1.N ~ ' " (l),KVv / r 

' - r ~ V' ....., ... 

: 

; 

' ' ' 11 

.. 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $181.900 

Costs covered under warranty (if !mown) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

( e.g., I nspcction, (include access, (@£85/hour) 

resting, and close- replacement) up) 

Replace -39 MOY 4.0 $5,500 

actuators 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this.f7e/d to explain any thing in the Es1i111ated Costs table 

that was assumed or might 1101 be obvious. This field can also be used to expfain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

.ffl't.l. 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulato1-y Policies and Procedures: 

~ 

Is the AD significant? ·~ 

* Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

YES*D NO~ 

YES*D NO~ 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. '~ · 

YES 0 NO~ 

Explanation: The AD will not have a significant economic effect on any entity. 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. ls it appropriate to include specifi c requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ -

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
LARGE DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE IN HARD COPY

Due to their large size, all documents in excess of 25 MB will not be available in this Deletion Docket but are available at public reposit ories. Those documents include:
1. Vol. 2 - South Plants BOA and CPA Soil Rem. Pr oject - Phase 2.pdf
2. Vol. 2 - South Plants BOA and CPA Soil Rem. Pr oject - Phase 2(2).pdf 3. Vol. III - Final Offpost OU Remedial Investiga tion and Chemical Specific Applicable or Relevant.pdf
4. South Plants Structures Demolition and Removal Project - Phase 2 Design Package.pdf 5. South Plants BOA and CPA Soil Rem. Project Pha se 2 Part 1 and 2 CCR Rev. 1.pdf 6. South Plants BOA and CPA Soil Rem. Project - P hase 1.pdf 7. Section 36 BOA Soil Rem. Project - Part 2 CCR. pdf 8. Section 36 BOA Soil Rem. Project - Part 1 CCR. pdf 9. Section 36 Bedrock Ridge Groundwater Plume Ex traction System.pdf 10. Section 36 Balance of Areas Soil Rem. Project. pdf 11. Secondary Basins Soil Rem. Project - Part 1..p df 12. Long-Term Monitoring Plan Groundwater and Surf ace Water.pdf 13. Basin F - Basin F Exterior rem. Project Part 1 .pdf

These documents are publicly available at the follo wing repositories.

• EPA's Region 8 Superfund Records Center, 1595 Wynko op Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202-2466. Hours: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m . by appointment (call 303- 312-6473), Monday through Friday, excluding legal h olidays; and the

• Joint Administrative Records Document Facility, Roc ky Mountain Arsenal, 5650 Havana Street, Building 129, Commerce City, Colorad o 80022-1748. Hours: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, exc luding legal holidays, or by appointment (call 303-289-0983).
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 28, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. Comments can 
also be sent electronically to or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dc9fb3b1b1b9b2a8aff2bdacacb0b5bfbda8b5b3b2af9caeb5bfb4f2baaebef2b3aebb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f6c4042424a415b5c014e5f5f43464c4e5b4640415c6f5d464c4701495d4d01405d48">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Dominik Mjartan and Georgia M. Mjartan, both of Columbia, South 
Carolina; to acquire voting shares of Optus Financial Corporation, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Optus Bank, both of 
Columbia, South Carolina.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 10, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-00593 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2



MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE & EQUITY, LLC

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Municipal Mortgage &
Equity, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period
ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Lisa Roberts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 1, 2013



|/s/Lisa M. Roberts      | 
|----------------------- | 
|Lisa M. Roberts         | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC and will be retained by Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered August 9, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01433-CR

GLENA EDDINGTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1271251-U

ORDER

In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against her. The record, 

however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in 

this case.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization 

of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court 

appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, 

the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to 

receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a 
document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court 

appointed attorney fee.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                 Certification of Chief Executive Officer under
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         I hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of O'Sullivan
Industries, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in such quarterly report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of O'Sullivan Industries, Inc.



Date: November 13, 2002                       /s/ Phillip J. Pacey
                                        --------------------------------
                                                Phillip J. Pacey
                                              Senior Vice President
                                           and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4370 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4370

    To require railroad carriers to prepare and maintain a plan for 
  notifying local emergency responders before transporting hazardous 
                 materials through their jurisdictions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

  Mr. Gonzalez (for himself and Ms. Norton) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require railroad carriers to prepare and maintain a plan for 
  notifying local emergency responders before transporting hazardous 
                 materials through their jurisdictions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Transportation of Hazardous 
Materials Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.

    Every railroad carrier engaged in the transportation of hazardous 
materials shall transmit to the Secretary of Transportation, and 
annually update, a plan for providing at least 48 hours notification to 
local emergency responders before transporting hazardous materials 
through their jurisdictions within 48 hours of a request for such 
information from those local emergency responders. This plan may 
include notification by means of county or State government agencies.

SEC. 3. DEMONSTRATION.

    The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a requirement that 
railroad carriers periodically demonstrate to the Secretary that the 
procedures set forth in the plan transmitted under section 2 are 
adequate to provide appropriate notice to those local emergency 
responders if they request this information as described in section 2.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``hazardous materials'' means materials 
        designated under section 5103(a) of title 49, United States 
        Code; and
            (2) the term ``emergency responder'' means State and local 
        emergency preparedness personnel described in section 613(a) of 
        the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 5196b(a)).
                                 <all>
```
Case: 1:18-mj-00239-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/09/18 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:18-mj-00239-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/09/18 Page: 2 of 7 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 1:18-mj-00239-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/09/18 Page: 3 of 7 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 1:18-mj-00239-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/09/18 Page: 4 of 7 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 1:18-mj-00239-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/09/18 Page: 5 of 7 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 1:18-mj-00239-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/09/18 Page: 6 of 7 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 1:18-mj-00239-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/09/18 Page: 7 of 7 PAGEID #: 7
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ESSXsport, Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending May 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Bruce Caldwell,
Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer  (Principal  Accounting
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Bruce Caldwell
-------------------
Bruce Caldwell
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
July 8, 2003
J-A04023-19

2019 PA Super 167

____________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

PI DELTA PSI, INC. 

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 458 EDA 2018

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence January 8, 2018

In the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County Criminal Division at 

No(s): CP-45-CR-0002578-2015

BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., KUNSELMAN, J., and COLINS*, J.

DISSENTING OPINION BY COLINS, J.: FILED MAY 23, 2019

I must respectfully dissent from the scholarly and well authored opinion 

of the majority as to its affirmance of the trial court’s exclusion of David L. 

Westol’s testimony regarding the Corporation’s having met a “national 

standard of care” regarding the promulgation and enforcement of an antihazing policy. In the instant matter the prosecution’s theory as to the guilt of 

the National Fraternity was basically one of vicarious liability and to exclude 

the proffered testimony, in my opinion, amounts to a manifest abuse of 

discretion.

I would vacate the conviction and remand for a new trial allowing the 

Westol testimony.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

 Case No. 5D22-2665

LT Case No. 2020-303667-CFDB

_____________________________

NICHOLAS C. HARRIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.

Raul A. Zambrano, Judge.

Matthew Metz, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

February 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders* appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence 

imposed by the trial court but remand for the trial court to: (1) 

correct the written judgment in 2020-303667-CFDB to reflect that 

* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2

Appellant was tried and found guilty by jury of, and is adjudicated 

guilty of, manslaughter (a lesser included offense), with a weapon, 

under sections 782.07(1) and 775.087(1)(b), Florida Statutes; (2) 

correct the written order of probation to reflect that Appellant was 

found guilty by jury verdict of, and is adjudicated guilty of, 

manslaughter (a lesser included offense), with a weapon; and (3) 

correct the scoresheet to list the description of the primary offense 

as manslaughter (a lesser included offense), with a weapon, and 

list the corresponding Florida Statutes of the primary offense, 

sections 782.07(1) and 775.087(1)(b).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s errors.

MAKAR and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

PRATT, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
3

Case No. 5D22-2665 

LT Case No. 2020-303667-CFDB

PRATT, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I concur in the panel’s affirmance of the judgment and 

sentence, but I respectfully dissent from the panel’s sua sponte

correction of scrivener’s errors in this Anders appeal. See Flowers 

v. State, No. 5D23-844, 2024 WL 387177, at *1–2 (Fla. 5th DCA 

Feb. 2, 2024) (Eisnaugle, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part).
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of World Am, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fredrick T. Rogers, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   December
      18, 2008
            /s/
      Fredrick T. RogersBy:  Fredrick
      T. RogersIts:  Chief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to  World Am, Inc. and will be retained by  World Am, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.