alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4628 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Sergeant 

Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2010 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. ADLER of New Jersey, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. HOLT, Mr. LANCE, Mr. LOBIONDO, 

Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey, Mr. SIRES, Mr. SMITH of 

New Jersey, Mr. PAYNE, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER R. HRBEK POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 216 Westwood Avenue in 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4628 IH

1 Westwood, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 

2 the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Build3 ing’’. 

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg5 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

6 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

7 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher 

8 R. Hrbek Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-67371, 333-76724, 333-96919, 333-117492, and 333-121829)
and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-39674, 333-39676, 333-39678, 333-103527,
333-113704, and 333-124803) of Headwaters Incorporated of our reports dated
November 30, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Headwaters Incorporated, Headwaters Incorporated management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Headwaters
Incorporated included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
September 30, 2005.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
November 30, 2005
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 6023

BILLY JUNIOR ARTIS
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
CAPTAIN WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT KELLY; SERGEANT JACKSON; OFFICER WAFFER; MS. WASHINGTON; ADMINISTRATOR DANIELS; ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT COBB; WATSON GOODMAN, III; MS. DAWSON; CAPTAIN MAY
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:15

- ct

- 03070

- BO )

Submitted : March 30 , 2017 Decided: April 4, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Billy Junior Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Billy Junior Artis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2012) action w ithout prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Artis’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district

court ’s disposition, Artis has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams

v. Giant Food Inc. , 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Emanuel Shoulders,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:17cv703

Z. Cherryholmes, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time. 

(Doc. 26). Plaintiff explains that he has been transferred to multiple jails and does not 

have his legal documents or evidence in his possession. Plaintiff requests that a copy of 

all his filings be mailed to him. Plaintiff also seeks an extension of time to take further 

action.

The Court notes that on July 7, 2018, the Magistrate Judge’s July 2, 2017 Order 

(Doc. 23) and July 2, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) were returned to the 

Clerk’s Office as undeliverable. (Doc. 25).

The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to mail the following to Plaintiff: (1) a copy of the 

docket in this matter; (2) the Magistrate Judge’s July 2, 2017 Order (Doc. 23); (3) a copy 

of the Magistrate Judge’s July 2, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24); and this 

Court’s Order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s December 12, 2017 Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 27). In addition, the docket in this matter is to be updated to 

reflect the address on Plaintiff’s current address: Corrections Center of Northwest Ohio, 

03151 County Road, 2425, Stryker, Ohio, 43557-9418.
However, Plaintiff should be aware that he has a duty to notify the Court of any 

and all changes in address. Barber v. Runyon, No. 93-6318, 1994 WL 163765, at *1 

(6th Cir. May 2, 1994).

Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 26) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall 

have fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett

United States District Judge
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, 

v.

TICHINA SHEPHARD, Petitioner. 

No. 1 CA-CR 23-0151 PRPC

FILED 11-30-2023 

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2017-005699-002 

The Honorable Danielle. J. Viola, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Douglas Gerlach

Counsel for Respondent 

Brown and Little, PLC, Chandler

By Matthew O. Brown

Counsel for Petitioner
STATE v. SHEPHARD

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Andrew M. Jacobs, and Judge 

Angela K. Paton delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Tichina Shephard seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying her petition for post-conviction relief. This is her first

petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing 

abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the petition for 

review, and the state’s response. We find that petitioner has not established 

an abuse of discretion. 

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
Case: 2:18-mj-00023 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/17/18 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: 1Case: 2:18-cr-00027-EAS Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/18/18 Page: 1 of 6  PAGEID #: 11

Case: 2:18-mj-00023 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/17/18 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: 2Case: 2:18-cr-00027-EAS Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/18/18 Page: 2 of 6  PAGEID #: 12

Case: 2:18-mj-00023 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/17/18 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: 3Case: 2:18-cr-00027-EAS Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/18/18 Page: 3 of 6  PAGEID #: 13

Case: 2:18-mj-00023 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/17/18 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: 4Case: 2:18-cr-00027-EAS Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/18/18 Page: 4 of 6  PAGEID #: 14

Case: 2:18-mj-00023 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/17/18 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: 5Case: 2:18-cr-00027-EAS Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/18/18 Page: 5 of 6  PAGEID #: 15

Case: 2:18-mj-00023 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/17/18 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: 6Case: 2:18-cr-00027-EAS Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/18/18 Page: 6 of 6  PAGEID #: 16
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

STATE OF OHIO

 EX REL TED MARCUM,

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:17-cv-437

- vs - District Judge Walter H. Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

SHERIFF DAVE DUCHAK,

:

Respondent.

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE

This case is before the Court on Motion (ECF No. 44) of Defendants Duchak, Davie, 

Gutmann, and Layman to Strike Plaintiff’s Sworn Affidavit of February 22, 2018 (ECF No. 40). 

The Sworn Affidavit begins by recounting the suicide in the Miami County Jail of an 

inmate within the twenty-four hours before the Affidavit was filed. It continues by noting jail 

overcrowding conditions and understaffing and the serious medical needs of other inmates along 

with inadequate medical care. Marcum complains that he himself has gained forty to fifty pounds 

since being incarcerated because of poor dietary provisions and lack of exercise. He also 

complains of Sheriff Duchak’s failure to visit the Jail at least monthly as required by Ohio law. 

As Defendants’ note, the Affidavit is improper as to form because it contains no notary 

public jurat. More importantly, it is not in support of any claims made in the Complaint or claims 

proposed to be added by amendment or supplementation.

Accordingly, the Motion to Strike is GRANTED.
2

April 10, 2018.

 s/ Michael R. Merz

 United States Magistrate Judge
**Exhibit 3.2.1.2**

 

**CERTIFICATEOF AMENDMENT****OF****CERTIFICATEOF INCORPORATION****OF****DECRANEAIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC.**

 

DECRANE AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “**Corporation**”)does hereby certify that:

 

1.  The amendment to theCorporation’s Certificate of Incorporation set forth below was duly adopted inaccordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General CorporationLaw of the State of Delaware (“**DGCL**”) and has been consented to in writingby the shareholders of the Corporation, and written notice has been given, inaccordance with Section 228 of the DGCL.

 

2.  Article FOURTH of theCorporation’s Certificate of Incorporation is amended in its entirety asfollows:

 

“FOURTH:  The aggregate numberof shares of all classes of which the Corporation shall have authority to issueis as follows:

 

(i) 1,000 shares of Common Stock, with par value of $0.01 per share(the “**CommonShares**”); and

 

(ii) 700,000 shares of Senior Redeemable Exchangeable Preferred Stockwith par value of $0.01 per share (the “**Senior Preferred Stock**”).  The Board of Directors is hereby authorizedpursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware to fix oralter from time to time the designations, powers, preferences and relative,participatory, optional or other rights, if any, and the qualifications,limitations or restrictions of the shares of the Senior Preferred Stock.”

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DECRANE AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC. has caused thisCertificate of Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officers on this23 day of July, 2004.

 
| DECRANE AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC., |  Attest:             |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                             |                      |
|                             |                      |
| By:                              | /S/ R. JACK DECRANE       |   | By: | /S/ JAMES E. MANN |   |
|                             | R. Jack DeCrane, Chairman |   | James E. Mann, Vice President |
|                                  |                           |  |  |  |  |

 

----
#### James B. Thompson and another v. The City of Detroit; Harriet E. George *v.*The City of Detroit; Cyrus Johnson v. The City of Detroit; and James B. McDowd v. The City of Detroit.

*Submitted on briefs June 17.*

*Decided June 18.*

*Certiorari*to Eecorder’s Court oí Detroit.

*Henry M. Cheever,*for plaintiffs in *certiorari.*

*F. G. Russell, City Attorney,*and *D. O. Holbrook, City Counselor,*for defendant in *certiorari.*

Pee Oueiam:

These cases are disposed of by the decision in *Brush v. Detroit, supra p. 43.*

The proceedings must be quashed.
FAA Approvals for POC RS-00400 - Timeline

# High level Timeline: Date Remarks 1 Delphi submitted application February-08 2 Delphi recd Approvals January-09 12 months from submission 3 Oxus Purchased Business May-10
4 Mr. Gilbert Roque Contact FAA (Mr. David Catey) and submitted documents of Sale and Req for transfer June-10 5 Verbal feed back form Mr. David Catey that no further action is reqd from Oxus July-10 6 Ms. Nancy Schon contact Mr. Richard Clark to follow up on the file August-10 3 months from initial contact 6.1 E-mail contact to Mr. Clark dated

8/23/10 23-Aug-2010 6.2 Follow up e-mail to Mr. Clark. Dated

9/2/10 02-Sep-10 6.3 Follow up e-mail to Mr. Clark. Dated

10/27/10 27-Oct-2010 6.4 Follow up e-mail to Mr. Clark. Dated

3/16/11 16-Mar-2011 7 PHMSA Confirmation on Oxus RS-00400 Dec-17-2010
8 File assigned to Ms. DK Deaderick March-11 No Response form FAA till March 2011 till Ms DK Deadrick was assigned to the file. (10 months from initial contact) 9 Email To Ms. DK Deaderick Dated 3/16/11
10Letter from Nancy Schon petitioning for name change 05-Apr-11 Written to US DOT , Docket Mangement Facility - appears to not have been entered in to the docket as of 12JL11

11Ms. DK has been working diligently to process the application and since then, only to report that the process will take longer since she has been advised to follow process for short simple rule June-11 13 months from initial contact Typical Simple rule making process and register update can take up to a year (per Ms. DK)
12Conf call with DK Deaderick and Anne Bechdolt. 12-Jul-2011 Oxus requested to submit revised petition letter.
13Updated Petition letter signed by G.Abusamra 12-Jul-2011 Letter written after conf call - all relevant documents attached. Emailed to DK Deaderick and uploaded to docket system.

L:\Quality\2_Certification - Regulatory\FAA\Timeline and index of attachmentsOverall Timeline
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

FILED 

RICHARD W r.!!1 i:iEL 

CLERK cc- er :.:~T 

7018 OCT I 0 PH 12: 00 

UNITED ST A TES OF AMERICA 

v. 

YANJUNXU 

Aka Xu Y anjun 

Aka Qu Hui 

Aka Zhang Hui 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOWMAN 

MOTION AND ORDER 

TO UNSEAL DOCUMENTS 

The United States respectfully requests that the Court unseal the Indictment and any other 

pleadings in case number 1: l 8-CR-043. The United States also respectfully requests the unsealing 

of the Complaint and Affidavit in 1: l 8MJ-190. Moreover, after coordination with Victim 

Company A in the Indictment, and in anticipation of the government's proof at trial, the 

government hereby identifies the company as GE Aviation. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BENJAMIN C. GLASSMAN 

United States Attorney 

sf Timothy S. Mangan 

TIMOTHY S. MANGAN (069287) 

Assistant United States Attorney 

221 East Fourth Street, Suite 400 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

(513) 684-3711 ; Fax: (513) 684-6385 

Case: 1:18-mj-00190-SKB Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/10/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 20
IT IS ORDERED that the Indictment and any other pleadings in the above-numbered cases 

shall now be unsealed. 

to/10/1 s 

DATE -~United States Magistrate 

~ Judge 

Case: 1:18-mj-00190-SKB Doc #: 4 Filed: 10/10/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 21
#### Benjamin McKinney v. The People.

*JT)iformation: Malicious destruction of personal property of the value of fifty dollars.*An information charging that the defendant, on a day and at a place named, in the county, “ a certain harness of the value of fifty dollars, of the personal property of one Edwin R. wilson, - then' 'and there being found, feloniously, willfully and maliciously did then and there injure and destroy, by then and there cutting the lines and martingales •of said harness, and talcing the rings from said martingales, contrary to the statute,” etc., is held a good information for the malicious destruction of personal property- of the value of fifty dollars.

*Submitted on briefs June 10.*

*Decided June 18.*

Error to Kent Circuit.

*285The information in this case alleged that the respondent, on September 29, 1874, “at the township of Paris in the county aforesaid, a certain harness of the value of fifty dollars, of the personal property of one Edwin B. 'Wilson,, then and there being found, feloniously, willfully and mali-ciouly, did then and there injure and destroy, by then and there cutting the lines and martingales of said harness, and. taking the rings from said martingales, contrary to the statute,” etc. It was objected that this information did not sufficiently allege the amount of injury or damage done, so as to show that the case was not one within the exclusive jurisdiction of a justice of the peace to try and determine.

*John McNamara,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. J. Smith, Attorney General,*for the People.

Pee, Oueiam:

We think the information in this case is a good information for the malicious destruction of personal property of the value of fifty dollars. There was consequently no error in giving judgment upon it.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Gary Siegel, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 8, 2008/s/ GARY SIEGEL*Name:
        Gary SiegelTitle:
        Vice President, Finance


*
        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by Genta Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.










---
Exhibit 10.4Lease
Agreement

LEASE AGREEMENT

THIS LEASE AGREEMENT, hereinafter referred to as Lease, entered into this 1st day of January, 2000, between Sheldon Homedale Family L.P., hereinafter called
the Lessor and T.J.T., Inc., a Washington Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Lessee:

WITNESSETH:

That the Lessor does hereby lease to Lessee and Lessee does hereby hire from Lessor the following described premises situated in Gem County, Idaho as described
on Exhibit "A" attached hereto:

Together
with all appurtenances thereto and with easements of ingress and egress necessary and adequate for the conduct of Lessee's business, for the term of four (4) years,
running from and including the 1st day of January, 2000, up to and including the 31st day of December, 2003, for use in Lessee's regular business, or any other legitimate business, subject to the
terms and conditions of this Lease.

In
addition to the above, Lessor and Lessee mutually covenant and agree as follows:

47

---

And
it is mutually understood and agreed that the covenants and agreements herein contained shall inure to the benefit of and shall be equally binding upon the respective executors,
administrators, heirs and assigns of the parties hereto.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease.

|/s/TERRENCE J. SHELDONTerrence J. Sheldon, Partner Sheldon-Homedale Family L.P.                        |  | Date 1/11/00
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------
|/s/LARRY B. PRESCOTTLarry B. Prescott, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, T.J.T., Inc. |  | Date 1/11/00

LEGAL DESCRIPTION (EXHIBIT A TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT)

From the East quarter corner of Section 6, Township 6 North, Range 1 West, B.M., Gem County, Idaho; thence West on quarter section line 1974.15 feet, to
the West line of the State Highway; thence South on said West line of Highway 384.5 feet, for a REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence West 152.2 feet, more or less, to the East line of the Old County Road;
thence Southerly on said East line of County Road, 483 feet, more or less, to where said County Road turns East; thence Easterly 110 feet along the North side of said County Road to the West side of
the right of way of the State Highway; thence Northerly on the West line of said right of way 483 feet, more or less, to said REAL POINT OF BEGINNING.

Except
that portion of Deed to the State of Idaho for Highway in Warranty Deed dated February 26, 1970, recorded April 10, 1970 as Instrument No. 99549, records
of Gem County, Idaho.

48

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                 453,420
<SECURITIES>                         6,380,717
<RECEIVABLES>                          938,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                            696,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     8,746,720
<PP&E>                               4,857,880
<DEPRECIATION>                       3,279,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      14,273,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                4,260,883
<BONDS>                              2,481,178
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                680
<COMMON>                                 5,738
<OTHER-SE>                           7,531,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        14,273,670
<SALES>                              1,602,179 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     1,619,575 
<CGS>                                  870,881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        3,309,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (83,087)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              0
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,893,411)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
        


</TABLE>