alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4542 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4542

   To prohibit the use of funds made available to the Department of 
Justice to prosecute individuals detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo 
                    Bay, Cuba, in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2010

Mr. King of New York (for himself, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Souder, Mr. 
Daniel E. Lungren of California, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. McCaul, Mr. 
Dent, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. 
 Olson, Mr. Cao, and Mr. Austria) introduced the following bill; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the use of funds made available to the Department of 
Justice to prosecute individuals detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo 
                    Bay, Cuba, in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Criminal Trials for 
Guantanamo Terrorists Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FUNDS TO PROSECUTE 
              INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, 
              CUBA, IN THE UNITED STATES.

    No funds made available to the Department of Justice may be used to 
prosecute an individual who was detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo 
Bay, Cuba, on or after January 22, 2009, in a criminal court located in 
the United States or in any territory or possession of the United 
States.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4395 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 616
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4395

                          [Report No. 111-330]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 22 (legislative day, March 19), 2010

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           September 27, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
     include the Gettysburg Train Station, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GETTYSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK BOUNDARY REVISION.

    Section 1 of the Act titled ``An Act to revise the boundary of the 
Gettysburg National Military Park in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 
and for other purposes'', approved August 17, 1990 (16 U.S.C. 430g-4), 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Additional Land.--In addition to the land identified in 
subsections (a) and (b), the park shall also include the following, as 
depicted on the map titled `Gettysburg National Military Park Proposed 
Boundary Addition', numbered 305/80,045 and dated January 2010:
            ``(1) The land and interests in land commonly known as the 
        `Gettysburg Train Station' and its immediate surroundings in 
        the Borough of Gettysburg.
            ``(2) The land and interests in land located along Plum Run 
        in Cumberland Township.''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF LAND.

    Section 2 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 430g-5) is amended by adding at 
the end of subsection (a) the following: ``The Secretary is also 
authorized to acquire publicly owned property within the area defined 
in section 1(d)(1) by purchase, from willing sellers only, if efforts 
to acquire that property without cost have been exhausted. The 
Secretary may not acquire property within the area defined in section 
1(d) by eminent domain.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 616

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4395

                          [Report No. 111-330]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
     include the Gettysburg Train Station, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 27, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4528 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4528

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require individuals to 
 provide their Social Security number in order to claim the refundable 
                    portion of the child tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2010

  Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of 
   Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require individuals to 
 provide their Social Security number in order to claim the refundable 
                    portion of the child tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Refundable Child Tax Credit 
Eligibility Verification Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER REQUIRED TO CLAIM THE REFUNDABLE PORTION 
              OF THE CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d) of section 24 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) Identification requirement with respect to 
        taxpayer.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to 
                any taxpayer for any taxable year unless the taxpayer 
                includes the taxpayer's Social Security number on the 
                return of tax for such taxable year.
                    ``(B) Joint returns.--In the case of a joint 
                return, the requirement of subparagraph (A) shall be 
                treated as met if the Social Security number of either 
                spouse is included on such return.
                    ``(C) Omission treated as mathematical or clerical 
                error.--Any failure to meet the requirement of 
                subparagraph (A) shall be treated as a mathematical or 
                clerical error and assessed according to section 
                6213(b)(1).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (e) of section 24 of such 
Code is amended by inserting ``With Respect to Qualifying Children'' 
after ``Identification Requirement'' in the heading thereof.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-35752 and 333-45028) and on Forms S-8 (Nos.
333-92337, 333-80501, 333-85107 and 333-26015) of Verso Technologies, Inc.
(formerly Eltrax Systems, Inc.) of our report dated February 28, 2000, except
for discontinued operations reclassifications and revisions, the date for which
is July 19, 2000, relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Detroit, Michigan
October 8, 2001
#### Council of the City of New York et al., Appellants, and Lawrence Hanley, Appellant-Respondent, v Rudolph Giuliani, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Respondents, and Atlantic Express Coachways, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 557]

*331Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered August 17, 2001, which, in a proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 and General Muncipal Law § 51, denied petitioners’ motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissed the article 78 petition as time-barred, but held that petitioner Hanley had stated a proper General Municipal Law §51 cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the cause of action under General Municipal Law § 51 and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court properly dismissed the CPLR article 78 proceeding commenced by the municipal petitioners as time-barred since their petition was brought more than four months after respondents’ decision to bypass the City Charter franchise procedures was final, and petitioners, by reason of the municipal respondents’ issuance of a request for proposals (RFP) suffered an actual, concrete injury *(see*CPLR 217 [1]; *Legal Aid Socy. v City of New York,*242 AD2d 423 [1997]; *Matter of GFIGenfare v New York City Tr. Auth.,*184 AD2d 334 [1992], *lv denied*80 NY2d 759 [1992]). The RFP’s issue without an authorizing resolution by the City Council was itself an act clearly bypassing the franchise process required by the City Charter (NY City Charter § 363 [e]), and petitioners’ assertions of a failure of notice are refuted by the record.

The court, however, erred when it found that petitioner Hanley had stated a taxpayer cause of action under General Municipal Law § 51. General Municipal Law § 51 is not a vehicle for correcting purely procedural irregularities by governmental bodies, such as those here asserted *(see Mesivta of Forest Hills Inst. v City of New York,*58 NY2d 1014, 1016 [1983]; *Beresford Apts. v City of New York,*238 AD2d 218 [1997], *lv denied*89 NY2d 815 [1997]; *Fisher v Biderman,*154 AD2d 155, 159-160 [1990], *lv denied*76 NY2d 702 [1990]; *Starburst Realty Corp. v City of New York,*125 AD2d 148, 154-156 [1987], *lv denied*70 NY2d 605 [1987]). Petitioner Hanley’s challenge to the municipal respondents’ alleged circumvention of the City Charter’s prescribed franchising process should have been brought pursuant to CPLR article 78. We do not, however, convert Hanley’s taxpayer action to an article 78 proceeding *(see*CPLR 103 [c]), since such a proceeding by Hanley would be no more timely than the proceeding of the municipal petitioners. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED 

Amendment No. 3 to 

2013 Stock Incentive Plan 

Pursuant to Section 11(d) of the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (as previously amended, the “Plan”) of MicroStrategy Incorporated
(the “Company”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 Section 4(a)(1) of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as
follows: 
 “(1) Authorized Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment under Section 9, Awards may be made under the Plan for
up to 1,700,000 shares of class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”), any or all of which Awards may be in the form of Incentive Stock Options (as defined in Section 5(b)).
Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.” 
 This Amendment
shall become effective on the date it is adopted by the Board; provided that, to the extent required, no Award shall be made pursuant to the Plan (other than an Award that would have been authorized under the Plan as in effect prior to this
Amendment) before stockholder approval of this Amendment, unless the Award is conditioned upon stockholder approval of this Amendment and the Award provides that (1) it will terminate or be forfeited if stockholder approval of the Amendment is
not obtained within 12 months from the date of the grant of such Award and (2) it may not be exercised or settled (or otherwise result in the issuance of Common Stock) prior to such stockholder approval. 

Adopted by the Board of Directors on October 23, 2015 

Approved by the Company’s stockholders 

on                     ,
20
Case: 3:17-cv-00334-TMR Doc #: 14-4 Filed: 04/16/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 271
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                            THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                        EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997
                           AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                                                                  BALANCE SHEET.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         797978
<NAME>                        FFCA INVESTOR SERVICES CORPORATION 86-B
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                            100
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          100
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      200
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.2


 


H.
Lee Hornbeck


Agent
for Stratex Oil & Gas Holdings LLC


12%
Secured Convertible Promissory Notes


3356
S. Hwy. 14


Greenville,
S.C. 29615


 


October
26, 2015


 


BY
FEDEX & BY EMAIL


 


Stratex
Oil & Gas Holdings Inc


39 Echo
Lake Road


Watertown,
Ct. 06795


Attention:
Stephen Funk


Email:
sfunk@stradexoil.com


 


	 	RE:	NOTICE OF EVENTS OF DEFAULT; NOTICE
    OF ACCELERATION OF OBLIGATIONS; NOTICE OF DEMANDS – 12% Series A and Series B Secured Convertible Promissory Notes
    (each, a "Series Note" and collectively, the "Series Notes") of a Colorado corporation with its Principal
    office locates at 30 Echo Lake Road, Watertown, Ct. 06795 (the "Company"), with all capitalized terms not defined
    in this letter being defined as in the Series Notes and all section references being references to sections of the Series
    Notes




 


Dear Sirs/Madams:


 


The undersigned
are the Successor Agents under the Series Notes. Please take notice of the following Events of Default:


 


1--The
failure by the Company to pay installments of interest on one or more Series Notes when due and payable and the continuance of
any such failure for 10 days.


 


*
* *


 






     

     


    

 


Pursuant
to Section 11, the undersigned Successor Agent


 


(a)--declares
all of the Obligations on all Series Notes to be immediately due and payable, and demands immediate payment of same.


 


(b)--demands payment of interest at the
Default Rate with respect to each installment of interest paid more than 10 days late, less the interest accrued and paid with
respect to each such installment through the date of actual payment.


 


(c)--demands
that all asset sales by the Company or its subsidiaries (other than sales in the ordinary course of the Company's or such subsidiary's
business) immediately cease.


 


*
* *


 


The Company
is reminded of Section 17's provisions wherein the Company expressly waives demand and presentment for payment, notice of nonpayment,
protest, notice of protest, notice of dishonor, notice of acceleration or intent to accelerate, bringing of suit and diligence
in taking any action to collect amounts called for under the Series Notes and shall be directly and primarily liable for the
payment of all sums owing and to be owing under the Series Notes, regardless of and without any notice, diligence, act or omission
as or with respect to the collection of any amount called for under the Series Notes.


 


On behalf
of the Series Note Holders the undersigned reserves all rights and remedies not herein exercised (including without, limitation
the undersigned's rights and remedies under Section 11 not herein exercised), waiving none by this letter.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/
    H. Lee Hornbeck
	 	H.
Lee Hornbeck, as Successor Agent under the Series A Notes
	 	 
	 	And
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Ernest Orlando
	 	Ernest Orlando,
as Successor Agent under the Series B  Notes
From: Crawford, Jeff S [mailto:Jeff.S.Crawford@maine.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:00 AM

To: Arnold, Anne

Cc: Aho, Patricia; Cone, Marc A; Downs, Tom

Subject: Docket Identification Number EPA-RO1-OAR-2012-0895

Anne:

I am pleased to provide additional technical information in support of Maine’s section 182(f) 

NOx waiver and OTR restructuring requests. The attached technical support document provides 

wind direction frequencies for periods when the hourly ozone levels were greater than 59 ppb 

at two coastal and two inland monitoring sites, and 36-hour back trajectories for every ozone

monitoring site in Maine. These analyses provide additional evidence that ozone levels above

75 ppb in Maine are coastal events, and solely the result of transport.

If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (207) 287-7647.)

Jeff Crawford

Attached files:

 Coveradditionaltechnical.pdf

 WDF and Trajectories of Ozone Events with NOX.ppts
#### Arnal Wayne GRIFFIN *v.*GEORGE’S INC.

79-195

587 S.W. 2d 225

Opinion delivered October 8, 1979

(Division I)

*Wommack & Hawkins,*by: *Claude S. Hawkins, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Crouch, Blair, Cypert & Waters,*for appellee.

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

In this case appellant filed suit against George’s, Inc. and other defendants seeking to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered by appellant when he became trapped in an unguarded grain auger owned and operated by George’s. Appellant alleged that he was, at *647the time, an employee of George’s, Inc., and that certain individual defendants, as supervisory employees of George’s, assigned him to work which exposed him to danger of injury by the grain auger, which he alleged was maintained and operated by his employer in such a hazardous and dangerous condition that the defendants recognized the substantial certainty that injury would result to a worker because of that condition. All the defendants filed a demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint which made these allegations. The demurrer was sustained as to George’s, Inc., but was overruled as to the individual defendants. In the order entered on the demurrer, the trial court granted appellant 30 days to plead further against George’s, Inc. The record discloses no further pleading by appellant, except for a notice of appeal. Nor does it disclose any final order dismissing appellant’s complaint. The appeal was taken from the order sustaining the demurrer.

We find ourselves in a position identical to that in *Nunez*v. *O. K. Processors,*238 Ark. 346, 381 S.W. 2d 754, except that, in this case, the notice of appeal did not contain an election by the appellant to stand on his pleadings. As we did in *Nunez,*we elect to afford the parties an opportunity to supply what is lacking, i.e., a final judgment dismissing the complaint as to George’s, Inc., and a notice of appeal from that judgment. If the parties will, within 15 days, take the necessary action to supplement the record in those respects and file a stipulation that the appeal may be heard upon the briefs already filed, we shall decide the case upon its merits; otherwise, the appeal will be dismissed without prejudice.

We agree. Harris, C.J., George Rose Smith and Hickman, JJ.
Exhibit 4 (a)



                                                                   March 7, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Subject: General Electric Capital Services,  Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for
         the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 - File No. 0-14804

Dear Sirs:

Neither General Electric Capital Services,  Inc. (the  "Corporation") nor any of
its  subsidiaries  has  outstanding any instrument with respect to its long-term
debt that is not  registered  or filed with the  Commission  and under which the
total  amount of  securities  authorized  exceeds 10% of the total assets of the
registrant and its  subsidiaries  on a consolidated  basis.  In accordance  with
paragraph (b) (4) (iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR  ss.229.601),  the
Corporation hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange  Commission,
upon request,  a copy of each instrument  which defines the rights of holders of
such long-term debt.

                                         Very truly yours,

                                         GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.


                                         By: /s/ J.A. Parke
                                             ------------------------------
                                             J.A. Parke,
                                             Executive Vice President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer