### Pyroxasulfon e Dietary Ex posure and Risk Assessment DP Num ber: D406657 P

C Code: 090099



### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D

. C. 20460



### MEMORANDUM
Date: 30-January-20 1 3 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION



### Subject: 

### Pyroxasulfone

. Acute and Chronic Aggrega te Diet ary Exposure and Risk Assessments for the Section 3 Regi s tration Request for Use ofPyroxas ulfone on Soybean

. PC Code: 090099 DP Barcode: D40665 7 Decision No

. : 462689 Registration N o.: 6 3588-9 I , 63588-92 and 635 88-9 3 Petition N o.: 2 F8 005 Regulatory Action : Section 3 R egistratio n Risk Assessment Type: Single Chemical, Di etary Case No .: NA TXR No.: NA CAS N o
. : 447399-55-5 

### MRIDNo.: NA 40CFR: 180.659

- 

# ./d--

Reviewer: Thurston G. Morton, Chem ist

# ~ f"'Cf_A../

# ~ Risk Assessment Branch IV!H e£t' h Effec ts Division (RABIV / HED ; 7509P) Through: Donna Davis, Senio r Chemist

# ~~ ./ ldeli z Negro n- E n carnac i on , Chemist 

# 7{/tt, L__.-::- Dietary Expos ure Science A d viso ry Council ,:@)ESAC)
And


### Susan V

. Humme l , Senior C h emist RABIVIHED (7509 P)
To: Thur ston 

## G. Mo rton , Risk Assesso r RABIV IHED 

### (750 9P )
And


### Erik Kraft Her bi c id e Branch/RD (7505P)

Page I of IIPyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 0406657 PC Code: 090099 

### Exec utive Summary Pyroxasulfone is proposed for us e on soy bean. Partially refined acute and chronic aggregate (food and water) assessments were conducted using maximum residues for com and to le rance l evel residues for soybean along with 100 % crop treate d (CT).

The resulting aggregate (food and water) acute exposure es timate s were less th an HED's level of concern ( <1 00% aP AD) for genera l U.S. population ( 1. 2% aP AD) and all population sub -group s ; the most highly exposed popu l atio n subgroup was A ll Infants < 1 year old w ith 3.6% aPAD at the 95th percentile.
The resulting aggregate (food and water) chronic exposure estimates were l ess than HED's l evel of concern ( < 1 00% cPAD) for general U.S. population (19% cP AD) and all population s ub-groups ; the most highly exposed population s ubgrou p was A ll Infan ts <1 year old w ith 48% cP AD.


### I. Introduction Dietary risk assessment incorporates both exposure and toxicity of a given pest i cide. Fo r ac u te and chronic assessments , the risk is expressed as a percentage of a maximum acceptab le dose (i.e., the do se which HED has concluded w ill result in no unreasonable adve r se health effects). T hi s dose is r eferred to as the population adjusted dose (PAD). The PAD is equ ivalent to point of departure (POD, NOAEL, LOAEL, e.g.) divided by the required unc ertainty o r safety factors.
For acute and non-cancer chronic exposures , HED is concerned when estimated dietary risk exceeds 100% of the PAD. HED i s generally concerned when estimated cancer risk exceeds one in one million. Reference s which discuss the acute and chro ni c risk assessments 

### in more detail
are available on the EP A/ pesticides web site: " Available Information on A s sessing Expos ur e from Pesticides, A User ' s Guide," 21-JUN-2000 , web li nk: http: // www.epa.gov / fedrgstr/EPA

PEST / 2000/July / Day- 1 2/606l.pdf ; or see SOP 99.6 (20-AUG -1 999). Pyroxas ulfone had a previous dietary risk assessment co nduct ed (T. Morton, 0365234, 12

/ 15 / 11).


### II. Residue Information
The registrant (K-1 Chemical , U.S.A. Inc.) has s ubmitted a petition to register pyroxasulfone for use on soybean. DEEM ® re s idue inputs for soybean commodities u sed tolerance level residue va lu es for soybean and maximum field trial residue levels for com (T

. Morton, D365229, 12/15/201 1 ). The existing toleran ces are li sted in 40 CFR 

### § 180 .659. To l erances for residues of pyroxasulfone raw agricu ltural commodities (RACs) w ill be established as follows based on field trial data:
Soybean , s eed

.. .. .. .. .. ................. . .. .. .. .. . ............... ... . ................... . ... .. . 0.06 ppm

Pag e 2 of IIPyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D 406657

PC Code: 090099

Page 3 of 11 

### Residues of concern are summarized in the table below (G. Kramer, D379930 , 7/30/2010):
Table 1. Compounds to be Included in the Risk Assessment and Tolerance Expression.

Matrix Resid ues included in Risk Assessment Residues included in Tolerance Expression for Compliance Monitoring Plants Cereal Grains Pyroxasulfone, M1, M3, M25 Pyroxasulfone, M1, M3, M25 ***

Soybeans Pyroxasulfone, M1, M3, M25, M28 ** Pyroxasulfone, M3, M25 , M28 * D rinking Water Pyroxasulfone, M1, M3 Not Applicable Pyroxasulfone = 3

- [[[5

- (difluoromethoxy)

- 1

- methyl

- 3

- (trifluoromethyl)

- 1 H

- pyrazol

- 4

- yl]methyl]sulfonyl]

- 4,5

- dihydro

- 5,5

- dimethylisoxazole. M1 = [5

- (difluoromethoxy)

- l

- methyl

- 3

- (trifluoromethyl)

- l H

- pyrazol

- 4

- yl)]methanesulfonic acid. M3 = 5

- (difluoromethoxy)

- l

- methyl

- 3

- (trifluoromethyl)

- l H

- pyrazole

- 4

- carboxylic acid. M25 = [5

- (difluoromethoxy)

- 3

- (trifluoromethyl)

- 1 H

- pyrazol

- 4

- yl)]methanesulfonic acid. M28 = 3

- [1

- carboxy

- 2

- (5,5

- dimethyl

- 4,5

- dihydroisoxazol

- 3

- ylthio)ethylamino]

- 3

- oxopropanoic acid. Metabolite C = 3

- [1

- carboxy

- 2

- (5,5

- dimethyl

- 4,5

- dihydroisoxazol

- 3

- ylthio)ethenylamino]

- 3

- oxopropanoic acid. * reanalysis of the seed samples showed residues of M28 and therefore M28 needs to be included in both the tolerance expression and risk assessment as a residue of concern in soybean seed

. M

- 1 is included for soybean forage and hay. ** residues of concern for soybean seed is p yroxasulfone and metabolite M

- 3, M

- 25, & M

- 28. ***residues of concern for corn, fie ld, grain and corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed is

pyroxasulfone and metabolite M

- 3. 

### III. Drinking Water Data The drinking water estimates used in the dietary risk assessment were provided by the E nvironmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED; Memo, J. Hetrick , 1

- June

- 20 1 1 ; D 3 90221 ). EFED conducted a Tier II PRZM GW drinking water assessment from ground water sources for the proposed new active ingredient

. Residues of concern for drinking water for risk assessment purposes were parent, M1, and M3. The estimated drinking water residues for peak concentration (used in the acute assessment) and average (used in the chronic assessment) were 0. 210 and 0. 1 74 m g/L (pp m ) , respectively.
IV. DEEM
- FCID  P rogram and Consumption Information Pyroxasulfone acute and chronic dietary exposure assessments were conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluat ion Model software with the Food Commodity Intake Database DEEM

FCIDTM, Version 3.16, which incorporates consumption data from USDA’s National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, What We Eat in America, (NHANES/WWEIA). This dietary survey was conducte d from 2003 to 2008. The data are based on the reported consumption of more than 20,000 individuals over two non

- consecutive survey days. Foods “as consumed” (e.g., apple pie) are linked to EPA

- defined food commodities (e.g. apples, peeled fruit

- cooked ; fresh or N/S; baked; or wheat flour

- cooked; fresh or N/S, baked) using publicly available recipe translation files developed jointly by USDA/ARS and EPA. For chronic exposure assessment,Pyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D 406657

PC Code: 090099

Page 4 of 11 

### consumption data are averaged for the entire U.S. population and within population subgroups, but for acute exposure assessment are retained as individual consumption events. Based on analysis of the 2003

- 2008 WWEIA consumption data, which took into account dietary patterns and survey respondents, HED concluded that i t is most appropriate to report risk for the following population subgroups: the general U.S. population, all infants (<1 year old), children 1

- 2, children 3

- 5, children 6

- 12, youth 13

- 19, adults 20

- 49, females 13

- 49, and adults 50

- 99 years old.
For chron ic dietary exposure assessment, an estimate of the residue level in each food or food

form (e.g., orange or orange juice) on the food commodity residue list is multiplied by the average daily consumption estimate for that food/food form to produce a residu e intake estimate. The resulting residue intake estimate for each food/food form is summed with the residue intake estimates for all other food/food forms on the commodity residue list to arrive at the total average estimated exposure. Exposure is expres sed in mg/kg body weight/day and as a percent of the cPAD. This procedure is performed for each population subgroup. For acute exposure assessments, individual one

- day food consumption data are used on an individual

- by

- individual basis. The reported con sumption amounts of each food item can be multiplied by a residue point estimate and summed to obtain a total daily pesticide exposure for a deterministic exposure assessment, or “matched” in multiple random pairings with residue values and then summed in a probabilistic assessment. The resulting distribution of exposures is expressed as a percentage of the aPAD on both a user (i.e., only those who reported eating relevant commodities/food forms) and a per

- capita (i.e., those who reported eating the releva nt commodities as well as those who did not) basis. In accordance with HED policy, per capita exposure and risk are reported for all tiers of analysis. However, for tiers 1 and 2, any significant differences in user vs. per capita exposure and risk are s pecifically identified and noted in the risk assessment. V. Toxicological Information The toxicological doses and endpoints for pyroxasulfone for use in the dietary assessment are summarized in Table 2.Pyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D 406657

PC Code: 090099

Page 5 of 11 Table 2. Toxicological Doses and End points for Pyroxasulfone for Use in Dietary Human Health Risk Assessments Exposure/ Scenario Point of

Departure Uncertainty/

FQPA Safety Factors RfD & PAD Study and Toxicological Effects Acute Dietary (General Population, NOAEL= 100

mg/kg UF A = 10 x

UF H =10 x FQPA SF=1x Acute RfD =

1.0 mg/kg
aPAD = 1.0 mg/kg Developmental neurotoxicity study (DNT) in

rats, MRID 47701724. The LOAEL of 300 mg/kg/day is based on decreased brain weight in both sexes, reduced thickness of the hippocampus, corpus callosum and cerebellum in PND 21 female offspring. Chronic Dietary (All Populations) NOAEL= 2

mg/kg/day UF A = 10 x

UF H =10 x FQPA SF=1x Chronic RfD

= 0.02 mg/kg/day
cPAD = 0.02 mg/kg/day One

- year chronic dog study, MRID 47701707

The LOAEL of 10 mg/kg/day is based on impaired hind limb function, ataxia, hind limb twitching and tremors; clinical pathology: increased creatine kinase, aspartate aminotransferase; axonal/myelin degeneration of the sciatic nerve and spinal cord sections. Cancer (all routes) “Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans” at doses that do not cause crystals with subsequent calculi

formation resulting in cellular damage of the urinary tract. Risk is quantified using a non

- linear (i.e., RfD) approach. Point of Departure (POD) = A data point or an estimated point that is derived from observed dose

- response data and used to mark the beginning of extrapolation to determine risk associated with lower environmentally relevant human exposures. NOAEL = no observed adverse effect level. LOAEL = lowe st observed adverse effect level. UF = uncertainty factor. UF A = extrapolation from animal to human (interspecies). UF H = potential variation in sensitivity among members of the human population (intraspecies). FQPA SF = FQPA Safety Factor. PAD = popu lation adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic). RfD = reference dose. MOE = margin of exposure. LOC = level of concern. N/A = not applicable.Pyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D 406657

PC Code: 090099

Page 6 of 11 

### VI. Results/Discussion As stated above, for acute and chronic assessments, HED is concer ned when dietary risk exceeds 100% of the PAD. The following summari z es the DEEM

- FCID  (ver. 3.16 ) chronic exposure analyses.
Acute and c hronic aggregate (food + water) analys e s w ere performed using DEEM

- FCID  estimating the dietary exposure of the U.S. population and various population subgroups. The results are summarized in Table 2

. The resulting acute food and water exposure estimates were less than HED’s level of concern (

- <100% a PAD) for the general U.S. population and all population sub

- groups
. The resulting chronic food and water exposure estimates were less than HED’s level of concern ( <100% c PAD) for the general U.S. population and all population sub

- groups ; All Infants <1 yr old had the highest dietary exposure at 48 % cPAD

. Table 2
. Results of Acute and Chronic Dietary Exposure Analysis for Pyroxasulfone (Food and Water)

Population Subgroup Acute Dietary (95th Percentile) Chronic Dietary Dietary Exposure (mg/kg/day) % aPAD Dietary Exposure (mg/kg/day) % cPAD
General U.S. Populatio n 0.0 11 5 72 1

. 2 0.00 3 7 2 8 1 9 All Infants (< 1 year old) 0.0 36 099 3.6 0.0 095 69 48
Children 1

- 2 years old 0.0 1 7 929 1. 8 0.00 54 63 2 7
Children 3

- 5 years old 0.0 1 47 14 1

. 5 0.00 4 527 2 3
Children 6

- 12 years old 0.0 110 88 1 .1 0.00 33 33 17
Youth 13

- 19 years old 0.00 9 6 40 1.0 0.00 27 4 7 1 4
Adults 20

- 49 years old 0.0 1 137 4 1

. 1 0.00 3 7 06 1 9
Adults 50

- 99 years old 0.0 101 65 1.0 0.00 3 6 44 1 8
Females 13

- 49 years old 0.0 1 15 27 1

. 2 0.00 3 6 9 0 1 8Pyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D 406657

PC Code: 090099

Page 7 of 11 

### VII. Characterization of Inputs/Outputs HED has conducted a highly conservat ive, health protective assessment for the new proposed use of pyroxasulfone on soybean. Maximum residues for corn commodities and tolerance level residues for soybean commodities along with 100 % CT were used in the acute and chronic dietary exposure asse ssments

. In addition, DEEM default processing factor of 1.5x was used for corn syrup. Residues do not warrant the need for further refinement at this time.
VIII. Conclusions Partially refined acute and chronic aggregate (food + water) dietary risk assessment s w ere conducted for pyroxasulfone using the DEEM

- FCID  (ver. 3.16 ) model using maximum residues, DEEM  default processing factor , and 100 % CT

. The resulting acute aggregate exposure estimate w as less than HED’s level of concern. For the gener al U.S. population and all population subgroups in the acute analys i s all dietary exposure estimates were ≤ 4 % a PAD). The resulting chronic aggregate exposure estimate w as less than HED’s level of concern. For the general U.S. population, the cPAD w as 1 9 % while the mo st highly

- exposed population subgroups in the chronic analys i s w as All Infants <1 year old ( 48 % cPAD).

IX. Attachments
List of Attachments: Attachment 1 : Residue Information

. Attachment 2 : Acute Results

. Attachment 3 : Chronic Results

.

cc with all attachments: T. Morton (RABIV) RDI: Donna Davis and Ideliz Negrón

- Encarnación

- DESAC ( 23

- October

- 20 1 2 ) ; S. Hummel ( 30

- January

- 20 1 3 ) Petition Number(s): 2 F 8005 DP #: 406657 PC Code: 0 9 0 099 T. Morton:S10 838 :PY1:(703)305

- 6691Pyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D 406657

PC Code: 090099

Page 8 of 11 

### Attachment 1 : Residue Information.

Acute Analysis

Filename: C: \ Documents and Settings \ tmorton \ My Documents \ MyFiles \ DEEM Files \ 090099 Pyroxasulfone \ Soybean \ 090099ACUTEFOODANDWATER.R08 Chemical: Pyroxasulfone RfD(Chronic): .02 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Chronic): 0 mg/kg bw/d ay RfD(Acute): 1 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day Date created/last modified: 11

- 08

- 2012/10:10:34 Program ver. 3.16, 03

- 08

- d

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA Crop Def Res Adj.Factors Comment Code Grp Commodity Name (ppm) #1 #2

---------- ---- ------------------------------- ---------- ------ ------ ------- 0600347000 6 Soybean, seed 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0600349000 6 Soybean, soy milk 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0600349001 6 Soybean, soy milk

- babyfood or in 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0600350000 6 Soybean, oil 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0600350001 6 Soybean, oil

- babyfood 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0601349500 6AB Soybean, vegetable 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0603348000 6C Soybean, flour 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0603348001 6C S oybean, flour

- babyfood 0.060000 1.000 1.000 1500120000 15 Corn, field, flour 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500120001 15 Corn, field, flour

- babyfood 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500121000 15 Corn, field, meal 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500121001 15 Corn, field, meal

- babyfood 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500122000 15 Corn, field, bran 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500123000 15 Corn, field, starch 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500123001 15 Corn, field, starch

- babyfood 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500124000 15 Corn, field, syrup 0.025000 1.500 1.000 1500124001 15 Corn, field, syrup

- babyfood 0.025000 1.500 1.000 1500125000 15 Corn, field, oil 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500125001 15 Corn, field, oil

- babyfood 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500126000 15 Corn, pop 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500127000 15 Corn, sweet 0.028000 1.000 1.000 1500127001 15 Corn, sweet

- babyfood 0.028000 1.000 1.000 8601000000 86A Water, direct, all sources 0.210000 1.000 1.000 8602000000 86B Water, indirect, all sources 0.210000 1.0 00 1.000Pyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D 406657

PC Code: 090099

Page 9 of 11 

### Chronic Analysis

Filename: C: \ Documents and Settings \ tmorton \ My Documents \ MyFiles \ DEEM Files \ 090099 Pyroxasulfone \ Soybean \ 090099CHRONICFOODANDWATER.R08 Chemical: Pyroxasulfone RfD(Chronic): .02 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Chronic): 0 mg/kg bw/day RfD(Acute): 1 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day Date created/last modified: 11

- 08

- 2012/10:11:13 Program ver. 3.16, 03

- 08

- d

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA Crop Def Res Adj.Factors Comment Code Grp Commodity Name (ppm) #1 #2

---------- ---- ------------------------------- ---------- ------ ------ ------- 0600347000 6 Soybean, seed 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0600349000 6 Soybean, soy milk 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0600349001 6 Soybean, soy milk

- babyfood or in 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0600350000 6 Soybean, oil 0.06000 0 1.000 1.000 0600350001 6 Soybean, oil

- babyfood 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0601349500 6AB Soybean, vegetable 0.060000 1.000 1.000 0603348000 6C Soybean, flour 0.060000 1.000 1.000 060334 8001 6C Soybean, flour

- babyfood 0.060000 1.000 1.000 1500120000 15 Corn, field, flour 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500120001 15 Corn, field, flour

- babyfood 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500121000 15 Corn, field, me al 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500121001 15 Corn, field, meal

- babyfood 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500122000 15 Corn, field, bran 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500123000 15 Corn, field, starch 0.025 000 1.000 1.000 1500123001 15 Corn, field, starch

- babyfood 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500124000 15 Corn, field, syrup 0.025000 1.500 1.000 1500124001 15 Corn, field, syrup

- babyfood 0.025000 1.500 1.000 1500 125000 15 Corn, field, oil 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500125001 15 Corn, field, oil

- babyfood 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500126000 15 Corn, pop 0.025000 1.000 1.000 1500127000 15 Corn, sweet 0.028000 1.000 1.000 1500127001 15 Corn, sweet

- babyfood 0.028000 1.000 1.000 8601000000 86A Water, direct, all sources 0.174000 1.000 1.000 8602000000 86B Water, indirect, all sources 0.1 74000 1.000 1.000Pyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D 406657

PC Code: 090099

Page 10 of 11 

### Attachment 2 : Acute Results

U.S. EPA Ver. 3.16, 03

- 08

- d DEEM

- FCID ACUTE Analysis for PYROXASULFONE NHANES 2003

- 2008 2

- Day Residue fil e: 090099ACUTEFOODANDWATER.R08 Adjustment factor #2 used. Analysis Date: 01

- 30

- 2013/10:04:44 Residue file dated: 01

- 30

- 2013/10:01:43 RAC/FF intake summed over 24 hours Run Comment: ""

========================================================= ====================== Summary calculations

-- per capita:
95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD

---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- Total US Population: 0.011572 1.16 0.019009 1.90 0.036310 3.63 All Infants: 0.036099 3.61 0.048713 4.87 0.071395 7.14 Children 1

- 2: 0.017929 1.79 0.027136 2.71 0.065558 6.56 Children 3

- 5: 0.014714 1.47 0.022349 2.23 0.035613 3.56 Children 6

- 12: 0.011088 1.11 0.018126 1.81 0.027935 2.79 Youth 13

- 19: 0.009640 0.96 0.015809 1.58 0.023824 2.38 Adults 20

- 49: 0.011374 1.14 0.016808 1.68 0.024520 2.45 Adults 50

- 99: 0.010165 1.02 0 .015218 1.52 0.023945 2.39 Female 13

- 49: 0.011527 1.15 0.016825 1.68 0.023688 2.37Pyroxasulfone Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D 406657

PC Code: 090099

Page 11 of 11 

### Attachment 3 : Chronic Results
U.S. EPA Ver. 3.16, 03

- 08

- d DEEM

- FCID Chronic analysis for PYROXASULFONE NHANES 2003

- 2008 2

- day Residue file name: C: \ Documents and Settings \ tmorton \ My Documents \ MyFiles \ DEEM Files \ 090099 Pyroxasulfone \ Soybean \ 090099CHRONICFOODANDWATER.R08 Adjustment factor #2 used. Analysis Date 01

- 30

- 2013/10:03:15 Residue file dated: 01

- 30

- 2013/10:02:26 Reference dose (RfD, Chronic) = .02 mg/kg bw/day

=============================================================================== Total exposure by population subgroup

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Exposure

------------- ---------------------- Population mg/kg Percent of Subgroup body wt/day Rfd

-------------------------------------- ------------- ---------------- T otal US Population 0.003728 18.6% Hispanic 0.003575 17.9% Non

- Hisp

- White 0.003828 19.1% Non

- Hisp

- Black 0.003095 15.5% Non

- Hisp

- Other 0.004289 21.4% Nursing Infants 0.003360 16.8% Non

- Nursing Infants 0.012342 6 1.7% Female 13+ PREG 0.003506 17.5% Children 1

- 6 0.004867 24.3% Children 7

- 12 0.003169 15.8% Male 13

- 19 0.002604 13.0% Female 13

- 19/NP 0.002888 14.4% Male 20+ 0.003462 17.3% Female 20+/NP 0.003885 19.4% Seniors 55+ 0.003571 17.9% All Infants 0.009569 47.8% Female 13

- 50 0.003694 18.5% Children 1

- 2 0.005463 27.3% Children 3

- 5 0.004627 23.1% Children 6

- 12 0.003333 16.7% Youth 13

- 19 0.002747 13.7% Adults 20

- 49 0.003706 18.5% Adults 50

- 99 0.003644 18.2% Female 13

- 49 0.003690 18.4%

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------