alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Trinidad, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 820]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered December 3, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The People’s summation, read as a whole, was generally responsive to defense arguments and did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see *People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 884 [1993]). While some of the challenged comments would have been better left unsaid, there was no misconduct that was so egregious as to require reversal. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Sullivan, JJ.
Case: 3:18-mj-00054-SLO Doc #: 7 Filed: 03/09/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 70
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4557 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to ensure 

that schools have physical education programs that meet minimum requirements for physical education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2010 

Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to ensure that schools have physical education 

programs that meet minimum requirements for physical 

education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Physical Edu5 cation to Create a Healthier Nation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PHYSICAL EDUCATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart 1 of part A of title I of 

8 the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4557 IH

1 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

2 the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 1120C. PHYSICAL EDUCATION. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the beginning of 

5 the first school year beginning after the date of enactment 

6 of the Physical Education to Create a Healthier Nation 

7 Act, each local educational agency receiving assistance 

8 under this part shall ensure that each school served by 

9 the agency has a physical education program that provides 

10 for all students— 

11 ‘‘(1) except as provided in paragraph (2)— 

12 ‘‘(A) in the case of an elementary school, 

13 150 minutes of physical education per week; 

14 and 

15 ‘‘(B) in the case of a middle school or high 

16 school, 225 minutes of physical education per 

17 week; and 

18 ‘‘(2) in the case of students with disabilities 

19 that impair their ability to participate in physical 

20 education, such physical education as is determined 

21 appropriate under the individualized education pro22 grams of such students (as defined in section 

23 602(14) of the Individuals with Disabilities Edu24 cation Act). 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4557 IH

1 ‘‘(b) STATE PLAN.—As part of the plan described in 

2 section 1111, each State educational agency receiving as3 sistance under this part shall develop a plan to ensure that 

4 all schools within the State have a physical education pro5 gram that meets the requirements under subsection (a). 

6 ‘‘(c) LOCAL PLAN.—As part of the plan described in 

7 section 1112, each local educational agency receiving as8 sistance under this part shall develop a plan to ensure that 

9 all schools served by the local educational agency have a 

10 physical education program that meets the requirements 

11 under subsection (a).’’. 

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con13 tents in section 2 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu14 cation Act of 1965 is amended by inserting after the item 

15 relating to section 1120B the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 1120C. Physical education.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: John Robert Moore v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00203

- CR

Trial court case number: 18

- CR

- 1549

Trial court: 212th District Court of Galveston County

On January 6, 2021, appellant’s counsel filed a letter informing the Court that counsel intends to seek permanent abatement of this appeal because appellant has died. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 7.1(a)(2) (“If the appellant in a criminal case die s after an appeal is perfected but before the appellate court issues the mandate, the appeal will be permanently abated.”). The C ourt requests
that counsel file a written update or a motion for permanent abatement by no later than September

1 , 2021

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Gordon Goodman

__________ Acting Individually

Date: _ August 10, 2021

_____________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT fet

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION pr
5/18
(l (>

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 1:18-po-00025
v.
MOTION TO DISMISS
NATHANIEL MARSHALL,
Defendant.

The United States moves to dismiss the above-captioned case.
Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN C. GLASSMAN
United States Attorney

s/ Timothy A, Landi
TIMOTHY A. LANDRY

Special Assistant United States Attorney
221 East Fourth Street, Suite 400
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Office: (513) 684-3711
Timothy.Landry@usdoj.gov
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Organic Soils.com, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray
L. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




                         /s/ Ray  L..Smith
                         -------------------------
                         Ray  L  Smith
                         Chief  Executive  Officer
                         Chief  Financial  Officer
                         March  15,  2003
**Exhibit      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                registrant.  |

| January                  19, 2007                                     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                       |   |
| /s/                  Jeffrey R. Immelt                                     |   |
| Jeffrey                  R. ImmeltChief                  Executive Officer |   |
|                                                             |   |
| /s/                  Keith S. Sherin                                       |   |
| Keith                  S. SherinChief                  Financial Officer   |   |
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Pursuant to Section II of the Bylaws (the "Bylaws") of American Housing Income Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), the Board of Directors unanimously adopts the following resolutions pursuant to Section III of the Bylaws:


RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors accepts Sean Zarinegar's resignation as Chief Executive Officer and President as being in the best interests of the Corporation.  The Board of Directors acknowledges, with Mr. Zarinegar abstaining from voting, that there are no pending claims or disputes with Mr. Zarinegar in serving as Chief Executive Officer and President during his tenure.


 	RESOLVED, that in light of Mr. Zarinegar's resignation, pursuant to Section IV.01 of the Bylaws, the Board of Directors appoints Jeff Howard to serve as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company.  Mr. Howard abstained from this part of the vote.


	RESOLVED, that the Executive Agreement between the Company and Mr. Howard is approved as being in the best interests of the Company.  Mr. Howard abstained from this part of the vote.


	RESOLVED, that Mr. Zarinegar is authorized to execute the Executive Agreement on behalf of the Company. Mr. Zarinegar abstained from this part of the vote.


 	RESOLVED, that these resolutions may be executed in counterpart with facsimile or electronic signatures constituting originals for all intents and purposes.


These resolutions are executed as of October 12, 2015.


APPROVED:


/s/ Sean Zarinegar

By: Sean Zarinegar

Its: Chairman of the Board

Abstaining in Part (See Above)


/s/ Kenneth Hedrick

By: Kenneth Hedrick

Its: Director


/s/ Jeff Howard

By: Jeff Howard

Its: Director
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4602 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4602

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1332 Sharon Copley Road in Sharon Center, Ohio, as the ``Emil Bolas 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMIL BOLAS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1332 Sharon Copley Road in Sharon Center, Ohio, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Emil Bolas Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Emil Bolas 
Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30 
      (legislative day September 29), 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
From: Tiffany Kolb <Tiffany.Kolb@aersale.com>

To: Jeff Gardlin/ANM/FAA@FAA

Date: 06/13/2011 01:18 PM Subject: Exemption No. 10223

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for taking the time to speak with me today regarding Exemption No. 10223 that we received on March 8, 2011.

As we discussed, the spirit of the exemption was to provide AerSale with cover from the NPRM until the AD became effective. The exact language of the exemption, however, states that the exemption expires when the AD is issued. Since the AD won’t be effective until August 1, 2011, we ask for clarification or an amendment to the exemption that extends the exemption until such time as the AD is effective.

Thank you very much. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions. As I mentioned, we are pressed for time, so your speedy action would be greatly appreciated!

Best regards,

Tiffany J. Kolb, Esq. AerSale, Inc. 121 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 1110 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Office: (305) 764-3234 Fax: (305) 444-1275 Mobile: (305) 877-0500 Email: tiffany.kolb@aersale.com

www.aersale.com
CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 6-K of Dialex Minerals Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I,  Alexander G. Stewart,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:                                    /s/ Alexander G. Stewart
                                      ----------------------------------
                                       Alexander G. Stewart
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       May 14, 2004

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Beier, Howlett, Hayward, McCann, Jones, Kingsepp & Shea v Keilani,

No. 90839;

Court of Appeals No. 115253.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAP TER 1. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2. ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK CHAPTER 3. MARKET AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 4. SCREENING ANALYSIS CHAPTER 5. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CHAPTER 6. ENERGY USE CHARACTERIZATION CHAPTER 7. PRODUCT PRICE DETERMINATION CHAPTER 8. LIFE-CYCLE COST AND PAYBACK PERIOD ANALYSES CHAPTER 9. TRIAL STANDARD LEVELS CHAPTER 10. SHIPMENTS ANALYSIS CHAPTER 11. NATIONAL IMPACTS ANALYSIS CHAPTER 12. LIFE-CYCLE CO ST SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS CHAPTER 13. MANUFACTUR ER IMPACT ANALYSIS CHAPTER 14. UTILITY IMPACT ANALYSIS CHAPTER 15. NET NATIONAL EM PLOYMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS CHAPTER 16. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 17. REGULATO RY IMPACT ANALYSIS

APPENDIX AA. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS APPENDIX 3A. LIGHTING DEFINITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES CODE AND CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS APPENDIX 3B. XENON AVAILABILITY AND PRICING APPENDIX 3C. RARE EARTH PHO SPHOR AVAILABILI TY AND PRICING APPENDIX 5A. ENGINEERING RESULTS USED IN THE SHIPMENTS, NATIONAL IMPACTS, AND LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSES APPENDIX 5B. T5 HALOPHOSPHOR MINIATURE BIPIN BASELINE LAMPS APPENDIX 5C. MODIFIED-SPECTRUM INCANDESCENT REFLECTOR LAMPS APPENDIX 5D. ADVANCED IR COATINGS APPENDIX 6A. ENERGY USE CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS USED IN THE SHIPMENTS, NATIONAL IMPACTS, AND LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSES APPENDIX 7A. ADDITIONAL END-USER PRICE RESULTS APPENDIX 8A. USER INSTRUCTIONS FOR LCC AND PB P SPREADSHEETS APPENDIX 8B. SUPPLEMENTARY LI FE-CYCLE COST AND PAYBACK PERIOD RESULTS APPENDIX 8C. RESIDENTIAL DISCOUNT RATE DISTRIBUTIONS APPENDIX 8D. HOT SHOCK IN INCANDESCENT REFLECTOR LAMPS APPENDIX 10A. SUPPLEMENTARY SCEN ARIO FOR THE SHIPMENTS ANALYSIS APPENDIX 10B. MARKET SEGMENT-BASED LIGHTING EXPERTISE ANALYSIS APPENDIX 10C. PENETRATION OF EM ERGING AND EXISTING TECHNOLOGIES APPENDIX 11A. USER INSTRUCTIONS FOR SHIPMENTS AND NIA SPREADSHEETS APPENDIX 11B. SUPPLEMENTARY SC ENARIOS FOR THE NATIONAL IMPACTS ANALYSIS

12 APPENDIX 13A. MANUFACTURER IMPACT ANALYSIS INTERVIEW GUIDE AND GOVERNMENT REGULATORY IMPACT MODEL (GRIM) APPENDIX 14A. INTERPOLATION OF UTILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS FROM NEMS-BT OUTPUT
AFS-15-1064-E 

December 10, 2015 

Mr. John Cudahy 

President 

International Council of Air Shows 

748 Miller Drive SE, Suite G-3 

Leesburg, VA 20175 

Mr. Bill Fischer 

Executive Director 

Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) Warbirds of America 

3000 Poberezny Road 

Oshkosh, WI 54902 

Dear Mr. Cudahy and Mr. Fischer: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption, and 

explains why we cannot process your request for an exemption, from § 91.319(c) of Title 14 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

You entered your petition for exemption on March 26, 2015, into public docket (No. FAA2015-0809) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of the 

International Council of Air Shows (ICAS) and the Warbirds of America (EAA) for an 

exemption from 14 CFR § 91.319(c). That exemption, if granted, would provide broad relief 

that would permit ICAS/EAA members to conduct overflights of various stadiums and 

sporting events in aircraft having experimental certificates. 

14 CFR § 91.319(c) in part states that: 

“...no person may operate an aircraft that has an experimental certificate over a 

densely populated area or in a congested airway. The Administrator may issue special 

operating limitations for particular aircraft to permit takeoffs and landings to be 

conducted over a densely populated area or in a congested airway, in accordance with 

terms and conditions specified in the authorization in the interest of safety in air 

commerce.” 
2 

The FAA considers a stadium or sporting event to be an open air assembly of people subject 

to regulation under § 91.119(b). Many stadiums and sporting events, however, will also be 

located around a densely populated area. In such cases, ingress, egress, and holding paths for 

stadium flyover events involving experimental aircraft would require an exemption from 

§ 91.319. The FAA does not have sufficient information about each flyover event (e.g. 

aircraft to be used, stadium to be overflown, geographical area surrounding the stadium) to 

know whether a particular flyover would involve flight over a densely populated area, your 

petition for exemption provides insufficient information upon which the FAA could base a 

grant of exemption. A grant of exemption is an individualized assessment that involves a 

determination that an equivalent level of safety to that provided under the regulations can be 

maintained. Without specific information about each intended flyover event, the FAA cannot 

make this assessment. 

In consideration of the forgoing, the FAA will take no further action on your request for 

exemption from 14 CFR § 91.319(c), and will close the docket on the petition. If you have 

any questions, you may call TJ Leahy, at (202) 267-0861.

 

Sincerely, 

//s// 

James M. Crotty 

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

Office of Rulemaking
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         34,083
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,857   
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,042     
<INVENTORY>                                    0         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,966   
<PP&E>                                         102,126   
<DEPRECIATION>                                 59,617    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,582   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          79,049    
<BONDS>                                        0         
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0         
<PREFERRED>                                    0         
<COMMON>                                       2,343     
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,067   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,582   
<SALES>                                        0         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               285,609   
<CGS>                                          0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,810   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               100,132   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             414       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                32,229    
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,461    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            15,155    
<DISCONTINUED>                                 4,614     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0         
<CHANGES>                                      0         
<NET-INCOME>                                   19,769    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.85      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.85      
                                                   

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: E. I. DU PONT DE 

NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8

PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION,

 Civil Action 2:13-md-2433

 JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. 

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

This document relates to: Angela and Teddy Swartz v. E. I. du Pont de

Nemours and Company, Case No. 2:18-cv-136.

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ORDER NO. 40

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law 

(ECF No. 178). Defendant moved under Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in open 

court during the trial in this matter. For the reasons set forth on the record during trial, the Court 

DENIES Defendant’s Motion (ECF No. 178).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9/8/2020 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:18-cv-00136-EAS-EPD Doc #: 235 Filed: 09/08/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 12234
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Dialex Minerals Inc.
(the  Company)  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, L. Kirk
Boyd,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, to the best of his/her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:                                    /s/ L. Kirk Boyd
                                      ----------------------------------
                                           L. Kirk Boyd
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                      December 17, 2004

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.