alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB700]


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a joint public meeting of its Skate Committee and Advisory 
Panel via webinar to consider actions affecting New England fisheries 
in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from this group 
will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration and 
action, if appropriate.

DATES: This webinar will be held on Wednesday, January 19, 2022, at 9 
a.m. Webinar registration URL information: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5357220193155347979.

ADDRESSES:  Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 
Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

    The Skate Committee and Advisory Panel will recommend preferred 
alternatives for this action that proposes to update the Northeast 
Skate Complex FMP objectives and revise the characteristics of the 
Federal skate permit in Framework Adjustment 9 to the Northeast Skate 
Complex Fishery Management Plan. Other business may be discussed, as 
necessary.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained on the agenda may come 
before this Council for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Council action will be restricted 
to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues 
arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action 
under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public 
has been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to 
address the emergency. The public also should be aware that the meeting 
will be recorded. Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy of the 
recording is available upon request.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 13, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-00919 Filed 1-13-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection  with the Quarterly Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on  Form 10-QSB for the three months ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard  Gagne, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: January 15, 2005

| /s/ Richard Gagne                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Richard Gagne, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal        Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial        Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
1

Hall-Jordan, Luke

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Update to the Refrigerant 

Management Requirements Under Section 608 of the Clean Air Act

Location: 1800 G Street, NW, 9th Floor - Conference Room 1

Start: Wed 9/30/2015 4:00 PM

End: Wed 9/30/2015 4:30 PM

Recurrence: (none)

Meeting Status: Accepted

Organizer: Echols, Mabel E.

This meeting was requested by Benjamin Klein, Podesta & Partners on behalf of Hudson Technologies.

Call-in: 202-395-6392; code 3862485.
A meeting was held on April 16 2012 from 11

‐ 12 with representatives from the AFPA, led by Paul Noe

and Susan Bodine. Avi Garbow, John Michaud, Susmita Dubey and Alan Carpien attended for EPA. We

listened to the arguments presented by the AFPA representatives in their comments on the rules,

attached below. This was a listening session for EPA.

From: Avi Garbow/DC/USEPA/US

To: Shanita Loving/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Patricia Embrey/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Wendy

Blake/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, John Michaud/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Alan Carpien/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,

Susmita Dubey/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/04/2012 04:53 PM

Subject:Fw: Meeting on Boiler MACT rules

Folks,

I've asked Shanita to try to schedule a meeting with AFPA (see below). Could you all please let Shanita

know who from ARLO and SWERLO should be present, given the issues described below? Thanks,

Avi

Avi Garbow

Deputy General Counsel

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(202) 564

‐ 1917

‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded by Avi Garbow/DC/USEPA/US on 04/04/2012 04:52 PM

‐‐‐‐‐

From: "Noe, Paul" <Paul_Noe@afandpa.org>

To: Avi Garbow/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/29/2012 05:54 PM

Subject:Meeting on Boiler MACT rules

Avi:

Could we schedule a time to follow up with you and your staff on our comments on the Boiler MACT and

NSHM rules? We would like to focus on the following issues: (1) that EPA has the legal authority to

grant a categorical 1

‐ year extension to the compliance deadline, as detailed in our Boiler MACT

comments (pp. 14; 27

‐ 30), and (2) that EPA has the authority and ability to list key biomass materials as

non

‐ waste fuels, as in our NHSM comments (pp. 8

‐ 9; 45

‐ 69).

We appreciate your consideration.

Best regards,

Paul

Paul NoeVice President for Public Policy

AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION

1111 19th Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20036

Paul_Noe@afandpa.org

202

‐ 463

‐ 2777 (phone)

202

‐ 463

‐ 2772 (fax)

www.afandpa.org
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3066330-MAR-201108:49 AM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Carrie E. Carter,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:18-cv-224

Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the court for consideration of the

August 2, 2019, report and recommendation of the United States

magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b). The magistrate judge concluded that the

administrative law judge erred by mischaracterizing and by failing

to adequately address the opinion of Karen Terry, Ph.D., a stateagency physician. The magistrate judge recommended that this case

be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§405(g),

sentence four, for further evaluation and discussion of Dr. Terry’s

opinion.

The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties

that failure to object to the report and recommendation within

fourteen days of the report “will result in a waiver of the right

to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to

appeal the judgment of the District Court.” Doc. 21, p. 12. The

time period for filing objections to the report and recommendation

has expired, and no party has objected to the report and

recommendation.

The court adopts the report and recommendation of the
magistrate judge (Doc. 21). The decision of the Commissioner is

reversed, and this case is remanded to the Commissioner under §405,

sentence four, for further administrative proceedings, as discussed

in the report and recommendation. The clerk shall enter judgment

remanding this case to the Commissioner.

Date: August 20, 2019 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge 

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

STATE OF OHIO
EX REL TED MARCUM,

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:17-cv-437

- VS - District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

SHERIFF DAVE DUCHAK,

Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

This case is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations (ECF
No. 41) recommending that the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Steve Layman (ECF No. 9) be
granted in its entirety and the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Dave Duchak, Elizabeth Gutmann,
and Rob Davie (ECF No. 7) be granted in part. The Report was served on Petitioner Marcum on
February 23, 2018, and he was notified that any objections were required to be served not later
than seventeen days later (ECF No. 41, PageID 639). Thus his time to file and serve objections

expired March 12, 2018, but he has filed no objections.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendations are ADOPTED insofar as they recommend

dismissing with prejudice all claims against Defendants Layman, Gutmann, and Davie and all


claims against Defendant Duchak except for Marcum’s Equal Protection claim regarding failure

to provide a free telephone call to contact a bondsman or attorney!.

March 9 , 2018. ; ~
LD on
Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge

' Sheriff Duchak has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s failure to recommend dismissal of this claim (ECF No. 45)
and the Court hnas recommitted the Motion to the Magistrate Judge for reconsideration in light of those Objections
(ECF No. 46).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Board of Education of The Springfield :

City School District, :

 : Case No. 3:17-cv-00330 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

vs. : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

 : 

HBH Technology, Inc., et al., :

 :

 Defendants. :

 

DECISION AND ENTRY

 The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of 

United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #43), to whom this case was 

originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been 

filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has 

expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. 

 It is therefore ORDERED that: 

1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on April 23, 2020 (Doc. #43) is 

ADOPTED in full; 

2. Plaintiff Board of Education of the Springfield City School District’s Motion 

for Default Judgment Against Defendant HBH Technology, Inc., fka Computer 

Automation Systems, Inc. (Doc. #34) is GRANTED, in part, and the Clerk of 

Court is directed to docket an entry of default against Defendant HBC 

Technologies pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a); and 

3. Plaintiff Board of Education of the Springfield City School District’s Motion 

for Default Judgment Against Defendant HBH Technology, Inc., fka Computer 

Case: 3:17-cv-00330-TMR-SLO Doc #: 44 Filed: 05/12/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 713
Automation Systems, Inc. (Doc. #34) is DENIED without prejudice to 

renewal after the successor-in-interest issue is resolved at summary judgment or 

trial. 

 May 12, 2020 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 

 Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 3:17-cv-00330-TMR-SLO Doc #: 44 Filed: 05/12/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 714
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 20, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 20, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0206. THE CITY OF SAVANNAH v. ANNE REDLUS et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

STCV1700661
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4480 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4480

     To amend the Community Services Block Grant Act to authorize 
appropriations for national or regional instructional programs for low-
                             income youth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2010

  Ms. Fudge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Community Services Block Grant Act to authorize 
appropriations for national or regional instructional programs for low-
                             income youth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Youth Sports Program 
Revitalization Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 682(g) of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 
9923(g)) is amended by striking ``$15,000,000'' and all that follows 
through ``2003'', and inserting ``$20,000,000 for each of the fiscal 
years 2011 through 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gary S. Titus, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer, of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                           
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Gary S. Titus                                         
|                   |  |  |  | Gary S. Titus                                             
|                   |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Arkansas State Highway Commission *v.*Roy Cromer et ux

5-4180

414 S. W. 2d 90

Opinion delivered May 1, 1967

*George 0. Green*and *Don Lcmgston,*for appellant.

*Ralph W. Robinson,*for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This condemnation suit involves a tract of land near the tract that was taken in what now appears to have been essentially a companion case: *Arkansas State Highway Commn.*v. *Griffin,*241 Ark. 1033, 411 S. W. 2d 495 (1967). There we *463held that the trial court erred in permitting the landowners to prove an enhancement in value that was the result of the proposed improvement, the construction of Interstate Highway 40. That same proof was made in the case at bar; so this judgment must also be reversed.

Counsel seek to distinguish the *Griffm*ease on the ground that there the landowners’ testimony in chief included the prohibited element of valuation, while here the condemnor’s attorney brought the matter out in cross-examining* the landowners’ expert witnesses.. When those witnesses admitted that they had taken such inflated selling prices into consideration in arriving at their estimates of the value of the property being taken, the highway department’s attorney made an unsuccessful effort to have those estimates of value excluded from the record.

The asserted distinction between that case and this one is not well taken. An expert witness may state his opinion without first giving the facts upon which it is based. *Arkansas State Highway Commn.*v. *Johns,*236 Ark. 585, 367 S. W. 2d 436 (1963). Hence the appellant’s attorney was compelled to elicit the facts by cross-examination. In this respect the case at hand is to be distingished from *Arkansas State Highway Commn.*v. *Russell,*240 Ark. 21, 398 S. W. 2d 201 (1966). There we held that a landowner’s testimony should not be stricken simply because he admits on cross-examination that he has taken an inadmissible fact (such as an offer to purchase) into account in reaching his conclusion about the value of his land. Here, by contrast, the experts ’ reliance upon inflated selling prices led them to an ultimate opinion that was actually erroneous for the purposes of condemnation, because it included an element of value not properly a part of just compensation. Hence the opinion should not have reached the jury’s ears, not because it was technically inadmissible but because it was wrong and consequently misleading to the jury.

Reversed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-20925) of Pharmaceutical Product
Development, Inc. and its subsidiaries of our report dated January 29, 2001
relating to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2000 and
1999 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000,
which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 13, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1317

HARRIETTA GIBBONS GIBBS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAPITAL REALTY ASSOCIATION; MANAGER PROPERTY

OWNER, WILLIE CREEK APARTMENTS; TENNENT HOLDING AGENT AND LEASING AFFILIATE STOCKHOLDERS;

ZIMMERMAN, Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-99-2136-2)

Submitted: August 31, 2000 Decided: September 14, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harrietta Gibbons Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the order from which Gibbs appeals was filed on

March 13, 2000, it was entered on the district court’s docket sheet

on March 14, 2000. March 14, 2000, is therefore the effective date

of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and

79(a); see also Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Harrietta Gibbons Gibbs appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim under 28

U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court and deny all pending motions. See Gibbs v. Capital Realty

Ass’n, No. CA-99-2136-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2000).* We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 28th day of September, 2004.

| | /s/ Brian Nichols                    
| | -------------------------------------
| | Brian Nichols
Chief Executive Officer
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection  with the Quarterly Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on  Form 10-QSB for the three months ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard  Gagne, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: January 15, 2005

| /s/ Richard Gagne                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Richard Gagne, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal        Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial        Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |