alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00551

- CV

In the INTEREST OF A.M.F . and J.P., Children

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- PA

- 02295

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order signed July 16,

2013, terminating the parental rights of Oscar Mata is AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed against

appellant because he is indigent.

SIGNED December 11, 2013.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Exhibit 99.2

Certification
of Chief Financial Officer underSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of OSullivan Industries, Inc.
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of OSullivan Industries, Inc.

|Date: | September 9, 2003 |  | /s/ Phillip J. Pacey     
|----- | ----------------- |  | -------------------------
|      |                   |  |                          
|      |                   |  | Phillip J. Pacey         
|      |                   |  | Senior Vice President and
|      |                   |  | Chief Financial Officer  

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OSullivan Industries, Inc.
and will be retained by OSullivan Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4376 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit discrimination on 

account of sexual orientation or gender identity when extending credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. 

POLIS of Colorado, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. 

HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. 

WEINER, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. HONDA, Mr. CAPUANO, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. 

CROWLEY, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. NADLER of New York, Ms. WATSON, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. SABLAN, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. 

SHERMAN, Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. BERKLEY, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. PETERS, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. 

LEE of California, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. OLVER, 

Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. WU, Ms. 

CLARKE, Ms. CHU, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. CLAY, Mr. TONKO, and Mr. 

MURPHY of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit 

discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender 

identity when extending credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4376 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom from Dis3 crimination in Credit Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION ON AC5 COUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR GEN6 DER IDENTITY. 

7 Subsection (a)(1) of section 701 of the Equal Credit 

8 Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘on the basis of race, color, reli10 gion, national origin, sex or marital status,’’; and 

11 (2) by inserting ‘‘on the basis of race, color, re12 ligion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender 

13 identity, or marital status,’’. 

14 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

15 Section 702 of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 

16 U.S.C. 1691a) is amended— 

17 (1) by striking subsections (f) and (g); and 

18 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol19 lowing new subsections: 

20 ‘‘(f) The term ‘gender identity’ means the gender-re21 lated identity, appearance, or mannerisms or other gen22 der-related characteristics of an individual, with or with23 out regard to the individual’s designated sex at birth. 

24 ‘‘(g) The term ‘person’ means a natural person, a 

25 corporation, government or governmental subdivision or 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4376 IH

1 agency, trust, estate, partnership, cooperative, or associa2 tion. 

3 ‘‘(h) The term ‘sexual orientation’ means homosex4 uality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality. 

5 ‘‘(i) Any reference to any requirement imposed under 

6 this title or any provision of this title shall be deemed to 

7 include a reference to the regulations of the Board under 

8 this title or the provision of this title in question.’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTS ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 filed on or about
December 18, 1998, May 25, 1999 and August 30, 1999 of Metropolitan Financial
Corp. of our report dated February 25, 2000 related to the consolidated
statements of financial condition of Metropolitan Financial Corp. as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1999, which report is included in this Form 10-K.


                                /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

                                Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 27, 2000
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection  with the Quarterly Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on  Form 10-QSB for the three months ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard  Gagne, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: January 15, 2005

| /s/ Richard Gagne                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Richard Gagne, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal        Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial        Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy A. Richardson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/  NANCY A.
RICHARDSON

Nancy A. Richardson

Chief Financial Officer,

General Counsel and Secretary

Date: August 14, 2003
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Kenneth T. Koehler, President and Chief Executive Officer of Metropolitan
Financial Corp. (the "Company") certifies in his capacity as an officer of the
Company that he has reviewed the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002 and that to his knowledge:

         (1)      the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: March 25, 2003                     /s/Kenneth T. Koehler
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         Kenneth T. Koehler,
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
## ROBINSON HELICOPTER COMPANY 2901 Airport Drive, Torrance, California 90505 Phone (310) 539-0508 Fax (310) 539-5198 66-13-06-07 June 18, 2013 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 400

# r h Street, SW Room PL 401 Washington, D.C. 20591-0001

Dear Sirs: Subject: Request to Rescind Exemption No. 9589 Reference: Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 14, Part 27.695 Power Boost and Power-Operated Control Systems Docket

### # FAA-2006-25287

Robinson Helicopter Company (RHC) would like to rescind an exemption it received forthe hydraulically boosted main rotor control system on the R66 helicopter. BACKGROUND: Exemption No. 9589 to Part 27.695 was grantedforthe model R66 helicopter on 28 January 2008. The exemption granted RHC relief from considering thejamming of a control valve as a possible single failure. The exemption was granted based on a number offactors includingthe simplicity ofthe proposed system and historical reliability ofthe same system used on the R44 helicopter. Despite bilateral airworthiness agreements, validation ofthe R66 in Canada, EASA membercountries, and the Commonwealth of Independent States was not possible with an exemption againstthe requirements of Part 27.695, only full compliance with the regulation or an Equivalent Level of Safety (ELOS) finding was acceptable. RHC consequently undertookthe analysis and testing necessaryto substantiate an ELOS. ELOS Memo#: AT14992LA-R-S-1 was granted bythe FAA on February 20,2013 for 14 CFR §27.695(a)(1).

-cont-Page 2 June 18, 2013 66-13-06-07The certification basis forthe R66 therefore now includes both Exemption No. 9589 and ELOS 

### # AT14992LA-R-S-1 forthe requirements of Part 27.695. REQUEST: In orderto eliminatethe inconsistency and confusion caused by having an Exemption and an ELOS forthe same regulation in the R66 certification basis, RHC is requesting thatthe Exemption be rescinded. SAFETY: There were no design, operating procedure, orcontinued airworthiness procedure changes associated with the ELOS finding and consequentlythere are no safety implications. PUBLIC INTEREST: Public interest is served by eliminating the confusion that may be caused by having an Exemption and ELOS againstthe same regulation. Thankyou foryour careful consideration of our request. Yours sincerely,

Certification Manager
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 76 of 94 PAGEID #: 83 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 470
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 77 of 94 PAGEID #: 84 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 2 of 19 PAGEID #: 471
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 78 of 94 PAGEID #: 85 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 3 of 19 PAGEID #: 472
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 79 of 94 PAGEID #: 86 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 4 of 19 PAGEID #: 473
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 80 of 94 PAGEID #: 87 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 5 of 19 PAGEID #: 474
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 81 of 94 PAGEID #: 88 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 6 of 19 PAGEID #: 475
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 82 of 94 PAGEID #: 89 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 7 of 19 PAGEID #: 476
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 83 of 94 PAGEID #: 90 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 8 of 19 PAGEID #: 477
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 84 of 94 PAGEID #: 91 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 9 of 19 PAGEID #: 478
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 85 of 94 PAGEID #: 92 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 10 of 19 PAGEID #: 479
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 86 of 94 PAGEID #: 93 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 11 of 19 PAGEID #: 480
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 87 of 94 PAGEID #: 94 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 12 of 19 PAGEID #: 481
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 88 of 94 PAGEID #: 95 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 13 of 19 PAGEID #: 482
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 89 of 94 PAGEID #: 96 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 14 of 19 PAGEID #: 483
EXHIBIT H

Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 90 of 94 PAGEID #: 97 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 15 of 19 PAGEID #: 484
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 91 of 94 PAGEID #: 98 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 16 of 19 PAGEID #: 485
EXHIBIT I

Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 92 of 94 PAGEID #: 99 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 17 of 19 PAGEID #: 486
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 93 of 94 PAGEID #: 100 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 18 of 19 PAGEID #: 487
Case: 1:17-cv-00667-MRB Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 10/05/17 Page: 94 of 94 PAGEID #: 101 Case: 1:17-cv-00667-TMR Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/10/17 Page: 19 of 19 PAGEID #: 488
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40965 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICARDO ALBERTO REYES-NAJERA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-155-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ricardo Alberto Reyes-Najera (Reyes) appeals his conviction and sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) for being found unlawfully present in the United States after having been deported following his conviction for an aggravated felony. Reyes asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. We need not decide the applicability of the waiver provisions in this case because the issue that Reyes raises is foreclosed.No. 05-40965 -2- Reyes’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Reyes contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Reyes properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4505 

To enable State homes to furnish nursing home care to parents any of 

whose children died while serving in the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2010 

Mr. THORNBERRY (for himself and Mr. SNYDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To enable State homes to furnish nursing home care to 

parents any of whose children died while serving in the 

Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF STATE HOME CARE FOR PAR4 ENTS OF VETERANS WHO DIED WHILE SERV5 ING IN ARMED FORCES. 

6 In administering section 51.210(d) of title 38, Code 

7 of Federal Regulations, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

8 shall permit a State home to provide services to, in addi9 tion to non-veterans described in such subsection, a nonVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:23 Jan 27, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4505.IH H4505

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4505 IH

1 veteran any of whose children died while serving in the 

2 Armed Forces. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 13, 2021

NO. 03-21-00329-CR

Christopher Michael Ferris, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4484 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4484

    To preclude individuals who have a pending charge or have been 
convicted of a crime from serving as enumerators for the collection of 
                              census data.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2010

 Mr. Chaffetz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To preclude individuals who have a pending charge or have been 
convicted of a crime from serving as enumerators for the collection of 
                              census data.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRECLUSION OF CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS FROM SERVING AS 
              ENUMERATORS.

    Section 25 of title 13, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(c) An individual who has a pending charge for a crime, or has 
been convicted of a crime in any court may not serve as an enumerator 
under this section.
    ``(d) For the purposes of this section, the term crime means any 
criminal offense other than a minor traffic offense.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
enactment of this Act, but shall not apply in the case of any 
individual who, as of such date of enactment, holds an enumerator 
position (whether by appointment, assignment, promotion, detail, or 
other personnel action).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,David D. Lee, certify that:

1.      I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Silicon Image, Inc.

2.      Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.      Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report.

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.      designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluaton; and

c.      disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.      allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b.     any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 12, 2004
| /s/  David  D. Lee          |
|---------------------------------------|
| David D. Lee*Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----