alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,531,623
<SECURITIES>                                20,011,172
<RECEIVABLES>                                  600,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,142,841
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,142,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          369,366
<BONDS>                                     18,402,333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,371,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,142,841
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               909,902
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               941,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             858,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, George Morgenstern,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/S/ GEORGE MORGENSTERN
---------------------------
George Morgenstern
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003




                                     - 23 -
Draft Proposal CB-24 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Recessed Lighting Sealing (CB-24) 

Objective:  Clarify the language for sealing recessed lighting that is located in the building thermal

envelope.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C402.4.8 as follows:  

C402.4.8 Recessed lighting. Recessed luminaires installed in the building thermal envelope shall be 

sealed to limit air leakage between conditioned and unconditioned spaces. All recessed luminaires shall

be IC-rated, and labeled as having an air leakage rate of not more than 2.0 cfm when tested in accordance 

with ASTM D E 283 at a 1.57 psf pressure differential. All recessed luminaires shall be and sealed with 

gasket or caulk between the housing and interior wall or ceiling covering. 

Reason:  Clarification and ease of use of the code.  The location in the building thermal envelope defines

by default the reason for the requirement (to limit air leakage).

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
ex4-10_f20f12312009.htm


 









Exhibit 4.10







Summary of Construction Supervision Contract with Shanghai Feng Xian Construction Management Co. Ltd.







On October 4, 2009, Shanghai Jinpan Electric Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) entered into an agreement (“Agreement”) with Shanghai Feng Xian Construction Management Co. Ltd. (the “Construction Supervisor”) for construction supervision and management services for the construction of 8,500 square meters of industrial buildings under construction at the Company’s Shanghai facility.







The term of the Agreement is six (6) months beginning on October 4, 2009 and ending on April 3, 2010.  The Construction Supervisor provides project management services and oversees quality and work place safety.







The total price for the construction supervision and management services is RMB 105,000 payable in several installments depending on the progress of the construction. The Company agreed to pay the Construction Supervisor fifty percent (50%) of the contract price , or RMB 52,500, within 10 calendars of signing the Agreement, thirty percent (30%) of the contract price, or RMB 31,500, after completion of the main structures,  and the remaining twenty percent (20%), or RMB 21,000, after inspection and acceptance of the buildings.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________

)

JANE / JOHN DOES 1-144, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 07-1048 (PLF)

)

CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. )

and DAVID DOES 1-10, )

)

Defendants. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion to transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 [Dkt. 

No. 38] is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ requests for jurisdictional discovery are 

DENIED; it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Steven Warshaw is DISMISSED from this 

case; it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the claims against defendants Fernando Aguirre, 

Robert Kistinger, Robert Olson, and William Tsacalis shall be severed pursuant to Rule 21 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Ohio pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the claims against defendants Cyrus Freidheim and 

Charles Keiser shall be severed pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 

Case: 1:18-cv-00076-MRB-SKB Doc #: 43 Filed: 01/11/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1303
2

TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 1631; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall transfer all papers in this 

proceeding, together with a certified copy of this Order, to the United States District Court for 

the Southern District of Ohio and to the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall remove this case from 

the docket of this Court.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/

 PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

 United States District Judge

DATE: January 11, 2018

Case: 1:18-cv-00076-MRB-SKB Doc #: 43 Filed: 01/11/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1304
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00885]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Information Systems Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Partially Closed Meeting

    The Information Systems Technical Advisory Committee (ISTAC) will 
meet on February 2, 2022, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time. The 
meetings will be available via teleconference. The Committee advises 
the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on 
technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable 
to information systems equipment and technology.

Wednesday, February 2

Open Session

1. Welcome and Announcements
2. Working Group Reports
3. Industry Presentation

Closed Session

4. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the provisions 
relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 10(a)(1) and 
10(a)(3).

    The open session will be accessible via teleconference. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cf96b9aabbbbaae19cbfbda6a1a8aabd8fada6bce1aba0ace1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90c9e6f5e4e4f5bec3e0e2f9fef7f5e2d0f2f9e3bef4fff3bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>, no later than January 26, 2022.
    To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral 
statements to the Committee. The public may submit written statements 
at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate 
distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the 
Committee suggests that public presentation materials or comments be 
forwarded before the meeting to Ms. Springer.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on January 7, 
2022, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended (5 U.S.C. app. (l0)(d))), that the portion of the meeting 
concerning trade secrets and commercial or financial information deemed 
privileged or confidential as described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and the 
portion of the meeting concerning matters the disclosure of which would 
be likely to frustrate significantly implementation of an agency action 
as described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 10(a)(1) 
and l0(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the 
public.
    For more information, contact Yvette Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-00885 Filed 1-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
32**
  **Certification
Pursuant to**
 **18
U.S.C. Section 1350**
  
  In
connection with the Annual Report of General Electric Capital Services, Inc.
(the “registrant”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), we, Dennis D. Dammerman and James A. Parke, Chairman of the
Board and Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the
registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:
  
  (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      registrant.
 
  
  March
      1, 2005/s/
      Dennis D. DammermanDennis
      D. Dammerman
      Chairman
      of the Board/s/
      James A. ParkeJames
      A. Parke
      Vice
      Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.2


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF 


PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


 


For good and valuable
consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned Inland Real Estate
Acquisitions, Inc., an Illinois corporation (“Assignor”) hereby assigns to IRESI Frederick Market Square,
L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”) all of Assignor’s right, title and
interest to purchase that property known as Haven at Market Square Apartments, located at 300 Cormorant Place, Frederick,
Maryland (the “Property”) pursuant to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement between Assignor, as purchaser,
and The Haven at Market Square, LLC, as seller, dated as of July 20, 2015, as amended (the “Purchase
Agreement”).


 


By execution hereof by
Assignee, Assignee for itself and its successors and assigns hereby accepts the assignment and assumes all of the obligations of
Assignor under the Purchase Agreement with respect to the Property.


 


This Assignment and Assumption
of Purchase Agreement is effective as of the 30th day of September, 2015.


 


	 	ASSIGNOR:	
        Inland Real Estate Acquisitions, Inc.,

        an Illinois corporation

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/ G. Joseph Cosenza
	 	 	Name:	G. Joseph Cosenza
	 	 	Its:	President
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	ASSIGNEE:	
        IRESI Frederick Market Square, L.L.C.,

        a Delaware limited liability company

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	
        Inland Residential Operating Partnership, L.P.,

        Sole Member

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	
        Inland Residential Properties Trust, Inc.,

        a Maryland corporation, General Partner

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/ David Z. Lichterman
	 	 	Name:	David Z. Lichterman
	 	 	Its:	Vice President, Treasurer & CAO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0471 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CARESSA JILL HARDY, aka GLENN LEE DIBLEY,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 1 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 4 2021

08/04/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0471
Exhibit 23.2










                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
National Bankshares, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-79979
on Form S-8 of National Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2000,
relating to the consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity, and cash flows of National Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
year ended December 31, 1999, which report is included in the December 31, 2001
Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Roanoke, Virginia
March 29, 2002
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 13-1776 FRONTIER FISHING CORP., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. PENNY PRITZKER; KATHRYN D. SULLIVAN, Defendants, Appellees. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on October 24, 2014 is amended as follows: On page 12, line 1, the word "Fourth" is changed to "Fifth".
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
10.35

     

    Loan
Agreement with Jinjiang City Branch of Agriculture Bank of China

    (No.:
35101200900001758) for RMB20 million

    


    
      
        	
                Date:

              	 	
                March
      6, 2009

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Lender:

              	 	
                Jinjiang
      City Branch of Agriculture Bank of China

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Borrower:

              	 	
                Guanke

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Amount:

              	 	
                RMB20
      million

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Category:

              	 	
                Short-term
      cash flow loan

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Term

              	 	
                From
      March 6, 2009 to March 5, 2010

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Interest
      rate:

              	 	
                5.5755%
      annually adjustable every 6 months.

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Interest
      repayment:

              	 	
                The
      interest shall be settled at the 20th day of each month.
      The Borrower should pay the accrued monthly interest on the interest
      settlement day and pay the outstanding interest on the maturity date of
      the loan.

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Pre-payment:

              	 	
                The
      pre-payment of the loan by the Borrower should be accepted by the Lender
      and the interest rate will remain the same to that of the actual
      period.

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Security:

              	 	
                Land
      use rights

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Governing
      law

              	 	
                Laws
      of the People’s Republic of
China
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ JAMES A. FONTAINE  
|James A. Fontaine      
|Chief Executive Officer



Date: May 2, 2005
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 64
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 2 of 13 PAGEID #: 65
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 3 of 13 PAGEID #: 66
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 4 of 13 PAGEID #: 67
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 5 of 13 PAGEID #: 68
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 6 of 13 PAGEID #: 69
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 7 of 13 PAGEID #: 70
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 8 of 13 PAGEID #: 71
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 9 of 13 PAGEID #: 72
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 10 of 13 PAGEID #: 73
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 11 of 13 PAGEID #: 74
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 12 of 13 PAGEID #: 75
Case: 2:18-cv-00020-JLG-CMV Doc #: 7-1 Filed: 04/05/18 Page: 13 of 13 PAGEID #: 76
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT STANLEY GORDON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-17452 

D.C. No. 5:10-cv-05399-EJD 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 23, 2021**

Before: GOODWIN, SILVERMAN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Robert Stanley Gordon, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s 

summary judgment for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) 

following MetLife’s denial of Gordon’s application for long-term disability 

benefits under a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 

of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. Where, as here, the district court conducted a de novo review of an 

ERISA plan administrator’s decision, we review for clear error its findings of fact. 

Silver v. Exec. Car Leasing Long-Term Disability Plan, 466 F.3d 727, 732-33 (9th 

Cir. 2006). We affirm. 

The record supports the district court’s finding that Gordon was not 

“disabled” as defined by the plan, that is, that he was not unable to work at his own 

occupation for any employer in his local economy during the relevant time period. 

See Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234, 242 (2001) (in reviewing for clear error, an 

appellate court will reverse only if “on the entire evidence,” it is “left with the 

definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”). 

We do not consider matters raised for the first time on appeal, including 

Gordon’s contention that the administrative record is incomplete. See Padgett v. 

Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 11

Case: 2:17-cv-00720-EAS-EPD Doc #: 31-11 Filed: 03/26/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 477
Dec 15 2017 4:33PM HP LA5ERJET FAX 6148465258 p.4 

• ., 

Fi ~cation for "ANDREW ANGLIN"- Yahoo Mail https:/lmg.mail.yahoo.com/neolb/message?sMid~6&fid~Inbox&fid., 

Filing Nollfloollon for "ANDREW ANQLIN" I . . . 

From: . "LJcN01Ropt~~niOstcmatyofli~e.~o~' .r;~oNotReply(l~hiQPJ~c:retflryOfsta.gov:. 

Toi I (!RE;GORYMARKAN<KING)YAHOO.COM 

Th• Offioa Df Ohio Seorot1ry Of :Stahl Jon HueteQ' n11 gtntr.tad tht!l me~>s.a;& In ICCOr'CIIMt With your rt!lqueste~ IUbtcrtptlon to th• eui!il!lo.e Filing t"'011n01tton Syitem, 

A TAACE NAM!;: REGISTRATION wttll the aft'actlv~ ttlllte Of Jlnuary 03, 2017 hell ~n I !:lei lid to tht ttc:lOrda of'ANP~ !:WA"''~I.IN', Rtgltlr'i:itlcm 

Number ~9"1'8203. 

'V.ou mfY r'tviWJ ttl111 fllii"'G In dttllll Y•tn~ thllllll'lk to the BLJ•Ir.~•• S41illroh•• on ttle Ol'llo. seerelll')' !jf' Stilt• w.b&lle: 

http://ww'IN5.tol .ltlte, ch.utfOrdB/t?p•1 00:7::: nca:pr _chartar _num :397EI200 

$1'1ould you hiVI futihtir queatlana ~r rtYitWing th• b-ulllnBIIII re~Qrdt, pitt•• g•fl toll frllao~:~t 677•$03•Fil.E (877w7!'J7-<'4~3) cr !1oem1 e11 &-Mill to !I'll 

buslneu ~arvlr;:os etd o1t bu:&t•rvcalchll)l!lecire111ryofs1.te.goll. 

~l~:~~e do not rtply to thh!Je.mail mei!III.JQ,, 

Ycu may unSt~l:ltol'lbl frOm thll!l !iiiiVIce 11ny 11mllll"tltJ)!I:/Ibspc~l.soui11I.OI'I.UifOI:ICFIIInglbe_~e~m•IIIEmtiiNottfloallon.al!lpx 

Thank you! 

Otrlce fJt Ohio Stort1•JY of Stab1 Jcn Muetocl 

TM Bu'-lria11 9ervlcaos 0111'1&1(11'1 

Case: 2:17-cv-00720-EAS-EPD Doc #: 31-11 Filed: 03/26/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 478
#### People v Porter,

No. 90844;

Court of Appeals No. 131110.