alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4514 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study to determine the suitability and 

feasibility of designating the Colonel Charles Young 

Home in Xenia, Ohio as a unit of the National Park 

System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4514 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Colonel Charles Young 

3 Home Study Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior (referred 

6 to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’), in consultation with 

7 the Secretary of the Army, shall conduct a special resource 

8 study of the Colonel Charles Young Home, a National His9 toric Landmark in Xenia, Ohio (referred to in this Act 

10 as the ‘‘Home’’). 

11 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub12 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

13 (1) evaluate any architectural and archeological 

14 resources of the Home; 

15 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

16 designating the Home as a unit of the National 

17 Park System; 

18 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

19 protection, and interpretation of the Home by Fed20 eral, State, or local governmental entities or private 

21 and nonprofit organizations, including the use of 

22 shared management agreements with the Dayton 

23 Aviation Heritage National Historical Park or spe24 cific units of that Park, such as the Paul Laurence 

25 Dunbar Home; 
3 

•HR 4514 EH

1 (4) consult with the Ohio Historical Society, 

2 Central State University, Wilberforce University, 

3 and other interested Federal, State, or local govern4 mental entities, private and nonprofit organizations, 

5 or individuals; and 

6 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac7 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

8 maintenance associated with the alternatives consid9 ered under the study. 

10 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

11 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec12 tion 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5). 

13 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

14 on which funds are first made available for the study 

15 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

16 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep17 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

18 Resources of the Senate a report that contains— 

19 (1) the results of the study under subsection 

20 (a); and 
4 

•HR 4514 EH

1 (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 

2 Secretary. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4514 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conpurposes. unit of the National Park System, and for other nel Charles Young Home in Xenia, Ohio as a suitability and feasibility of designating the Colo- duct a special resource study to determine the
exhibit10_2.htm




FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT OF SALE AND PURCHASE


 


This FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT OF SALE AND PURCHASE (this “First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 1st day of June, 2010, by and between AJ IRVINE OWNER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“Seller”), and HINES GLOBAL REIT PROPERTIES LP,  Delaware limited partnership (“Purchaser”).  Landlord and Tenant are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties.”


 


RECITALS


 


A.           Seller and Purchaser entered into that certain Contract of Sale and Purchase dated as of May 13, 2010 (the “Purchase Contract”) regarding the sale of certain property located at 17600 Gillette Avenue, Irvine, CA 92614, as further described in Section 1.1 of the Purchase Contract (the “Property”).


 


B.           Seller and Purchaser desire to modify the Purchase Contract on the terms and conditions contained herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1. Capitalized Terms.  All capitalized terms when used herein shall have the same respective meanings as are given such terms in the Purchase Contract, unless expressly provided otherwise in this First Amendment.


 


2. Purchase Price.  Effective as of the date of this First Amendment, the Purchase Price of Twenty Million Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($20,750,000) shall be reduced to an amount equal to Twenty Million Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($20,350,000).


 


3. Holdback Amount.  Section 2.1.3 of the Purchase Contract shall be amended such that the amount to be held back from the Purchase Price as the Holdback shall be reduced from Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) to Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000).


 


4. Inspection Period.  The mutual execution and delivery of this First Amendment by Purchaser and Seller shall constitute the Purchaser's waiver of its right to terminate the Purchase Contract during the Inspection Period and Purchaser shall have no further right to terminate the Purchase Contract except as expressly provided in the Purchase Contract as amended by this First Amendment.


 


5. Conflict; No Further Modification.  In the event of any conflict between the Purchase Contract and this First Amendment, the terms of this First Amendment shall prevail.  Except as specifically set forth in this First Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Purchase Contract shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


[Signatures on following page]


 


 




  





  











  






 


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed as of the day and year first above written.


 


"SELLER"


 


AJ IRVINE OWNER CORPORATION,


 


a Delaware corporation


 


By:           


Name:           


Its:           


 


"TENANT"


 







 


HINES GLOBAL REIT PROPERTIES LP


 


By:           Hines Global REIT, Inc.


 


Its general partner


 


By:           


 


Name:           


 


Its:
Case: 3:18-mj-00138-PBS Doc #: 5 Filed: 03/13/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 58
**Exhibit 21**

**Partnership Subsidiaries**

A.P. Woodson Company—District of Columbia 

Columbia Petroleum Transportation, LLC—Delaware 

MarexCorporation—Maryland 

Meenan Holdings of New York, Inc.—New York 

Meenan Oil Co., Inc.—Delaware 

Meenan Oil Co., L.P.—Delaware 

Minnwhale, LLC .—New York 

Ortep of Pennsylvania,Inc.—Pennsylvania 

Petro Holdings, Inc.—Minnesota 

Petro Plumbing Corporation—New Jersey 

Petro, Inc.—Delaware 

Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc.—Minnesota 

RegionOil Plumbing, Heating and Cooling Co., Inc.—New Jersey

Richland Partners, LLC—Pennsylvania 

Star Gas FinanceCompany—Delaware 

Star/Petro, Inc.—Minnesota 

TG&E Service Company, Inc.—Florida
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 5, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00020

- CR

IN RE STATE OF TEXAS , ex. rel. Todd A. “ Tadeo ” Durden, County Attorney

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

On January 27 , 20 20 , this court ordered Kinney County to pay the costs for preparing the

reporter ’ s record no later than February 7, 2020

, subject to th is court later det ermining whether

costs should otherwise be taxed on the final disposition of this original proceeding. We also

ordered that t he rep o rte r ’ s record be fi led no later than ten days aft er the costs were paid

.

On Febr u a ry 3, 2020, the court reporter filed a Notification of Late Record stating she

received payment for the record on February 3, 2020, and she asked for thi rty days in which t o

file the record. T he request is g ranted and the record is due no later than March 3, 2020.

Relator is reminded that its amended petition for writ of mandamus, with all a ppr opriate

citations to the record

, i s d ue no later than fifteen days from the date the reporter ’ s record is

filed

. If relator fail s to timely file it s amended petition for writ of mandamus

, this original

proceeding w ill be dismissed for want of prosecuti on

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.9, 42.3.

It is so ORDERED on February 5, 2020

. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_________________________ MICHAEL A. CRU Z

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of The State of Texas v. Mark Anthony Gonzalez ; Cause No. 10041CR, and twenty

- one

other cases, pending in th e County Court, Kinney County, Te xas. The H onorable S i d L. Ha rle signed the order at

issue in this origi nal proceeding.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4344 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4344

  To prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from obligating any 
       amounts for the regulation of emissions of carbon dioxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

   Mr. McCotter (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Mr. Tiberi) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from obligating any 
       amounts for the regulation of emissions of carbon dioxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF OBLIGATION OF ANY AMOUNTS FOR THE REGULATION 
              OF EMISSIONS OF CARBON DIOXIDE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Environmental 
Protection Agency may not obligate any amounts to regulate emissions of 
carbon dioxide.
                                 <all>
```
EXIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I, Jules Loeb, President of Reliant Nome Warranty Corporation., herby certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB Reliant Nome Warranty Corporation;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue 

statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d -14) for the registrant and I have: 

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”) ; and

 

(c)  presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation date;

 

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and to the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materials weaknesses in internal controls; and 

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.  I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 Date: Aug 19, 2007/

 

/s/ Jules Loeb

----------------------------------------------------------

|   | By: Jules Loeb, |
|--------|-----------------|

|   | Title: President |
|--------|------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         168,402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,136
<PP&E>                                          21,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 414,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,425
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       723,132
<OTHER-SE>                                   (491,919)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   414,058
<SALES>                                          1,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,809
<CGS>                                           14,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (252,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (252,481)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4471 

To clarify that revocation of an alien’s visa or other documentation is not 

subject to judicial review. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2010 

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself and Mr. HOEKSTRA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify that revocation of an alien’s visa or other 

documentation is not subject to judicial review. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF VISA REVOCATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 221(i) of the Immigration 

5 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1201(i)) is amended by 

6 striking the final sentence and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including 

8 section 2241 of title 28, United States Code, or any other 

9 habeas corpus provision, and sections 1361 and 1651 of 

10 such title, a revocation under this subsection may not be 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4471 IH

1 reviewed by any court, and no court shall have jurisdiction 

2 to hear any claim arising from, or any challenge to, such 

3 a revocation.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact6 ment of this Act and shall apply to revocations under sec7 tion 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

8 U.S.C. 1201(i)) occurring before, on, or after such date. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-67371, 333-76724, 333-96919, 333-121829 and 333-142143), on Form S-4 (File No. 333-140067) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-39674, 333-39676, 333-39678, 333-103527, 333-113704, and 333-124803) of HeadwatersIncorporated of our reports dated November 16, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Headwaters Incorporated and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Headwaters Incorporated included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2007. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Salt Lake City, Utah 

November 16, 2007
# Eiropas Savienības C 436/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 436 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 58. sējums2015. gada 24. decembris |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 436

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

58. sējums2015. gada 24. decembris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Paziņojumi |
| | EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI |
| | Eiropas ParlamentsPadome |
| 2015/C 436/01 | Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes kopīgs paziņojums attiecībā uz Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2015. gada 16. decembra Regulu (ES, Euratom) 2015/2422, ar ko groza 3. protokolu par Eiropas Savienības Tiesas statūtiem | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

IV   Paziņojumi

EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI

Eiropas ParlamentsPadome

2015/C 436/01

Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes kopīgs paziņojums attiecībā uz Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2015. gada 16. decembra Regulu (ES, Euratom) 2015/2422, ar ko groza 3. protokolu par Eiropas Savienības Tiesas statūtiem

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

IV Paziņojumi

EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI

Eiropas Parlaments Padome

| 24.12.2015 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2015

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 436/1

---

Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes kopīgs paziņojums attiecībā uz Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2015. gada 16. decembra Regulu (ES, Euratom) 2015/2422, ar ko groza 3. protokolu par Eiropas Savienības Tiesas statūtiem (1)

(2015/C 436/01)

Kad beigsies reformu process, Vispārējo tiesu veidos divi tiesneši no katras dalībvalsts. Tādēļ, lai nodrošinātu sieviešu un vīriešu līdztiesību, kas ir LES 3. pantā nosprausts Eiropas Savienības mērķis, dalībvalstu valdībām, saskaņā ar LESD 254. pantu ieceļot kandidātus par Vispārējas tiesas tiesnešiem, cik vien iespējams būtu jānodrošina vienāda sieviešu un vīriešu pārstāvība.

---

(1)  OV L 341, 24.12.2015., 14. lpp.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PATRICK DE LA CRUZ MORENO,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 12

- 00027

- CR

Appeal from

112th District Court

of Pecos County, Texas

(TC # 3061)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Patrick De La Cruz Moreno filed notice of appeal in two

criminal cases, cause numbers 3061 and 3156, but his attorney has since advised the Court that

he mistakenly filed notice of appeal in cause number 3061. Finding that there is no final

judgment or appealable order in th e instant case, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where

there has been a final judgment of conviction. See Workman v. State , 170 Tex.Crim. 621, 343

S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); Bridle v. State , 16 S.W.3d 906, 907 (Tex.App.

- - Fort Worth 2000, no

pet.). An appellate court does not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders, unless that

jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. See TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.A NN. art. 44.02

(West 2006); Bridle , 16 S.W.3d at 907. A final judgment has not been entered in this case and

Appella nt does not allege that there is an appealable interlocutory order. In fact, Appellant’s

attorney has notified the Court that Appellant was not convicted in cause number 3061 because

the case was re

- indicted and Appellant was subsequently convicted in cau se number 3156. The

appeal from that conviction will proceed in Patrick De La Cruz Moreno v. State , cause number- 2

-

08

- 12

- 00028

- CR. We therefore dismiss the appeal arising out of cause number 3061 for want of

jurisdiction.

May 9 , 2012

________________________________________________ ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/28/2015 10:59:24 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk