alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [FRS 63285]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# DATES:

The agency must receive comments on or before March 21, 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rolanda F. Smith, 202-418-2054.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The following applicants filed AM or FM proposals to change the community of license: PENN-JERSEY EDUCATIONAL RADIO CORPORATION, WPNJ(FM), Fac. ID No. 174811, From EASTON, PA, To HARMONY TOWNSHIP, NJ, File No. 160326; BROADCAST COMMUNICATIONS III, INC., WKHB-FM, Fac. ID No. 36116, From SCOTTDALE, PA, To UNIONTOWN, PA, File No. 162606; ESTRELLA BROADCASTING, LLC, NEW(FM), Fac. ID No. 762492, From SELLS, AZ, To KEARNY, AZ, File No. 159317; RADIOJONES, LLC, WXRS-FM, Fac. ID No. 36212, From BROOKLET, GA, To PORTAL, GA, File No. 143396; and CLARO COMMUNICATIONS, LTD, KUKA(FM), Fac. ID No. 2818, From SAN DIEGO, TX, To DRISCOLL, TX, File No. 145176. The full text of these applications is available electronically via the Media Bureau's Consolidated Data Base System,                     *https://licensing.fcc.gov/​prod/​cdbs/​pubacc/​prod/​app_​sear.htm*                     or Licensing and Management System (LMS),                     *https://apps2int.fcc.gov/​dataentry/​public/​tv/​publicAppSearch.html.*

Federal Communications Commission.

Thomas Horan,

Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 2022-00820 Filed 1-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3 Case No. 3:17 PO 238
Plaintiff,
vs. : MICHAEL J. NEWMAN
United States Magistrate Judge
SCOTT RIGGS 3 GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR
DISMISSAL
Defendant.

Now comes the United States, by and through counsel, and respectfully requests the
Court dismiss the above captioned case.

Respectfully submitted,

G- navel > BENJAMIN C. GLASSMAN
mv

United States Attorney

s/Elizabeth R. Rabe

ELIZABETH R. RABE (NY 4698072)
4 le / 4 Assistant United States Attomey

Attorney for Plaintiff

200 West Second Street, Suite 600

Dayton, Ohio 45402

Office: (937) 225-2910

Elizabeth.Rabe@usdoj.gov

ERTIFI:

I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion was electronically filed on 04 September 2018 and
Defense Counsel of Record will be notified of this Motion through CM/ECF.

s/Elizabeth R. Rabe

ELIZABETH R. RABE (NY 4698072)
Assistant United States Attorney
Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 1 of 34  PAGEID #: 2359

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 2 of 34  PAGEID #: 2360

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 3 of 34  PAGEID #: 2361

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 4 of 34  PAGEID #: 2362

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 5 of 34  PAGEID #: 2363

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 6 of 34  PAGEID #: 2364

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 7 of 34  PAGEID #: 2365

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 8 of 34  PAGEID #: 2366

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 9 of 34  PAGEID #: 2367

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 10 of 34  PAGEID #: 2368

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 11 of 34  PAGEID #: 2369

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 12 of 34  PAGEID #: 2370

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 13 of 34  PAGEID #: 2371

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 14 of 34  PAGEID #: 2372

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 15 of 34  PAGEID #: 2373

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 16 of 34  PAGEID #: 2374

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 17 of 34  PAGEID #: 2375

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 18 of 34  PAGEID #: 2376

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 19 of 34  PAGEID #: 2377

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 20 of 34  PAGEID #: 2378

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 21 of 34  PAGEID #: 2379

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 22 of 34  PAGEID #: 2380

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 23 of 34  PAGEID #: 2381

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 24 of 34  PAGEID #: 2382

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 25 of 34  PAGEID #: 2383

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 26 of 34  PAGEID #: 2384

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 27 of 34  PAGEID #: 2385

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 28 of 34  PAGEID #: 2386

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 29 of 34  PAGEID #: 2387

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 30 of 34  PAGEID #: 2388

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 31 of 34  PAGEID #: 2389

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 32 of 34  PAGEID #: 2390

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 33 of 34  PAGEID #: 2391

Case: 2:17-cv-01153-MHW-KAJ Doc #: 75 Filed: 02/18/21 Page: 34 of 34  PAGEID #: 2392
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ralph C. Guild, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Ralph C. Guild                               
|                     |  | Ralph C. Guild                                   
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

PAUL W. CARTER,

Petitioner,

vs.

ADAMS COUNTY COURT OF 

COMMON PLEAS,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Case No. 1:17-cv-650

 Judge Timothy S. Black

 Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 23) AND

TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate 

Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on April 22, 2019, submitted a 

Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 23). No objections were filed.

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo 

all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in 

its entirety. 

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1) Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with 

prejudice;
2

2) A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the grounds 

for relief alleged in the petition because petitioner has not stated a “viable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right,” nor are the issues presented 

“adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” See Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 475 (2000) (citing Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 

893 & n.4 (1983)); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b);

3) The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this 

Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore Petitioner is denied leave 

to appeal in forma pauperis;

4) The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 5/29/19 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77581-77582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31974]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7727]

Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs; Modifications to 
Grant Guidelines and Procedures

    SUMMARY: The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) 
announces four modifications to the guidelines governing the award of 
program grants and cooperative agreements by the Bureau and the

[[Page 77582]]

procedures used to implement them, beginning on or about January 3, 
2012.

Background

    The guidelines governing ECA's grant program were established in 
1983 and have been modified from time-to-time to comply with new 
directives and mandates. The four modifications outlined in this 
announcement will serve to further support the Department's Greening 
Diplomacy Initiative, help the Department adhere to new OMB guidance to 
all Federal agencies to streamline, standardize and simplify grants 
processes, allow for expanded monitoring and oversight over programs 
and increase opportunities for new organizations to compete for ECA 
programs.
    The modifications are:
    (1) Eliminating use of the Federal Register to announce ECA grant 
funding opportunities referred to as Request for Grant Proposals 
(RFGPs) and rely exclusively on the Grants.gov and ECA Web sites for 
this purpose.
    (2) Requiring all applicants submitting proposals in response to 
RFGPs to utilize the grants.gov web--portal site exclusively for 
submission of grant proposals. Thus, eliminating the current ``hard- 
copy'' submission option.
    (3) Increasing the ``pilot grant limit'' for awards to 
organizations with less than four years of experience conducting 
international exchanges from the current $60,000 level established in 
1983 to $130,000 which reflects a comparable ceiling in today's 
dollars, adjusted for inflation. ECA will also update the pilot grant 
limit from time to time in the future, not to exceed the 1983 level 
adjusted for inflation.
    (4) Modifying ECA's current grant renewal process to allow for 
Option Years for certain programs. Individual announcements for 
competed programs will contain information on whether a program will be 
renewed through additional awards or through the use of option years, 
pending successful performance and the availability of funds.

Additional Information

    For additional information please contact Hans Posey, Program 
Management Division, ECA/EX/PM, U.S. Department of State, 2200 C Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20037, (202) 632-6385, email: PoseyHE@state.gov.

     Dated: December 7, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-31974 Filed 12-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P
```
Exhibit 10.4


 


Amendment
to PROMISSORY NOTE 


 


This
Amendment to Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 23, 2015 (the
“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Global Defense & National Security Systems, Inc. (the “Company”),
and Global Defense & National Security Holdings LLC (the “Lender”). Capitalized terms used in this Amendment
but not defined herein shall have the meanings given in the Note (as defined below).


 


Whereas:
the Company previously issued a Promissory Note having an initial principal amount of US$361,435.68 with an issuance date as of
July 21, 2015 (the “Note”); and


 


Whereas:
each of the Company and the Lender desires to amend certain terms of the Note in accordance with the terms and provisions in this
Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the premises and the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.          Section
2 is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:


 


“2.         This
promissory note (the “Note”) will be repaid in full on the earlier of (1) November 24, 2015, or (2) immediately
following the consummation of the Company’s initial Business Combination (as defined in the Company’s Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation) (the “Business Combination Trigger”).”


 


2.          Except
as modified by this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment and the
Note (including the documents referred to herein and therein) represent the entire understanding of the parties hereto with respect
to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all prior agreements or understandings, oral or written, with respect to
the subject matter hereof and thereof. In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and/or the
Note (including the documents referred to herein and therein), (a) to the extent the conflicting provisions can reasonably
be interpreted so that such provisions are consistent with each other, such consistent interpretation shall prevail; and (b) to
the extent the preceding subsection (a) does not apply, the terms of this Amendment shall control.


 


3.          This
Amendment will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the state of Delaware.


 


[Signatures on the following page]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Amendment Effective Date.


 


	
        GLOBAL DEFENSE & NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC:

        
	GLOBAL DEFENSE & NATIONAL SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC:
	 	 
	 	By: Black Marlin Ltd, its Manager


 


	By:	/s/ Frederic Cassis	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	/s/ Damian Perl
	Name:	Frederic Cassis	 	 	 
	 	 	 	Name:	Damian Perl
	Title:	
        Secretary
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	Title:	Manager





	Execution Date:	October 23, 2015	 	 	 
	 	 	 	Execution Date:	October 23, 2015


 




    2
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.47 February 26, 2004 Jan Hughes
2027 Mezes Avenue
Belmont, CA 94002 Dear Jan: Molecular Devices Corporation is pleased to confirm our verbal offer for promotion to the salaried,
exempt position of Vice President, IonWorks Product Development. In this position you will report
directly to me and be a member of the Leadership Team and the PAC. Your base salary will be $15,000 per month ($180,000 per annum) payable semi-monthly on the 15th
and last day of each month. As a member of the management staff, you will be eligible to
participate in the 2004 MDC Executive Bonus Plan (bonus at Plan 40%). A portion of your 2004 bonus
in the amount of $20,000 is guaranteed provided you remain employed with MDC through calendar year
2004. You will be eligible to receive 15,000 Incentive Stock Options subject to the approval of the
Molecular Devices Board of Directors. These options will vest in accordance with the Companys
vesting schedule over a period of four (4) years, and will be subject to the provisions of the
Companys 1995 Stock Option Plan as amended. Jan, your experience and talents will be strong additions to the Leadership Team. We are looking
forward to having you join our team. Sincerely, MOLECULAR DEVICES CORPORATION /s/ Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D. 
 Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer Accepted:
    
    /s/ Jan Hughes
 Date: 2/26/04
Start Date: March 1, 2004
NOBLE MASERU, 

V. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI 

Case No. 1:18-cv-106 

Plaintiff, Judge Matthew W. McFarland 

UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI, 

Defendant. 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ATTEND THE FINAL 

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE REMOTELY (DOC. 84) 

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Attend the Final 

Pretrial Conference Remotely (Doc 84). The Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for 

October 5, 2022 at 10:00 AM. On October 4, 2022, only a day before the Final Pretrial 

Conference, Plaintiff filed this motion seeking leave from the Court to attend the Final 

Pretrial Conference remotely due to Plaintiff experiencing vertigo and suffering from 

dizziness. The filing of this motion occurred after the Court had already denied the same 

request via email. 

The Court would note that its Standing Order states that "[a]ttorneys must bring 

the party, principal, or agent with full settlement authority to the Final Pretrial 

Conference." (See Standing Order Regarding Procedures in Civil Cases.) Additionally, 

the Court informed each parties' counsel that all parties must be present at the Final 

Pretrial Conference. 

Case: 1:18-cv-00106-MWM-KLL Doc #: 85 Filed: 10/04/22 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1304
The Standing Order places the burden to bring the party bringing the action on 

the attorneys. The Court appreciates that Plaintiff is uncomfortable driving, but the 

motion makes no attempt to acknowledge alternative means of ensuring that the Plaintiff 

is present for the Final Pretrial Conference. This matter has been pending for almost five 

years. The Court has reserved several dates on its busy trial calendar to ensure that this 

matter proceeds to justice and resolution. The Final Pretrial Conference was scheduled in 

April 2022. Plaintiff and his counsel have had ample time to make travel arrangements. 

Thus, the Court finds that Plaintiff failed to establish good cause for why he should 

attend the Final Pretrial Conference remotely. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to 

Attend the Final Pretrial Conference Remotely (Doc. 84) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

By:1{~,/VC-1if}JJ 

JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND 

2 

Case: 1:18-cv-00106-MWM-KLL Doc #: 85 Filed: 10/04/22 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1305
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       4,096,141                 334,387
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,929                  31,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  64,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,196,139                 454,248
<PP&E>                                       1,572,442                 271,739
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,889                  10,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,053,019                 725,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          301,390                  86,258
<BONDS>                                      1,662,500                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        11,952                   5,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,955,639               2,199,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,053,019                 725,987
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,990                  45,967
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,291,056                 720,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,333                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,288,399)               (674,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,780                   1,624
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,290,179)               (676,152)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,290,179)               (676,152)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)                  (0.06)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Darrell E. Lee,

Plaintiff,

V. Case No. 2:18-cv-109

Commissioner of Sociai Security, Judge Michaei H. Watson

Defendant. Magistrate Judge Vascura

OPINION AND ORDER

On November 14, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Vascura Issued a

Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court reverse the

Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") non-dlsablllty finding and

remand this case to the Commissioner and the ALJ under Sentence Four of §

405(g). ECFNo. 16.

The R&R notified the parties of their rightto file objections to the R&R

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). R&R10, ECF No. 16. The R&R further

advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days

would result in a waiverofthe right to de novo review by the District Judge and

waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R.

Id. The deadline forfiling such objections has passed, and no objections were

filed.

Having received no objections, the R&R Is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's

statement of errors Is SUSTAINED and the Commissioner's decision Is
REVERSED. This case Is REMANDED to the Commissioner and the ALJ under

Sentence Four of § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the R&R.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case No. 2:18-cv-109

MIC1HAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Page 2 of 2