alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
       (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 14, 2010
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive Officer
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 23
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 2 of 10 PAGEID #: 24
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 3 of 10 PAGEID #: 25
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 4 of 10 PAGEID #: 26
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 5 of 10 PAGEID #: 27
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 6 of 10 PAGEID #: 28
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 7 of 10 PAGEID #: 29
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 8 of 10 PAGEID #: 30
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 9 of 10 PAGEID #: 31
Case: 2:17-cv-01112-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 6 Filed: 02/16/18 Page: 10 of 10 PAGEID #: 32
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302(a) OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Larry B. Prescott, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed thisAmendment No. 1 to the report on Form 10-K/A of T.J.T., Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)                                      designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)                                     evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation, and

 

c)                                      disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)                                      all significant deficienciesin the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and

 

b)                                     any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 
| /s/Larry B. Prescott    |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Larry B. Prescott       |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| January 31, 2005        |   |   |

 

----
In The Matter Of:

EPA Bristol Bay Public Hearing - Igiugig v

August 15, 2014

Midnight Sun Court Reporters

511 W. 9th Ave.

Anchorage, AK 99501

Ph. 907-258-7100

Fax 907-276-6727

To open files, click on the desired file type in bookmark on left.

For quick saving or searching multiple files, click attachments tab (or paperclip) on left.

For best viewing/searching, use Adobe Reader/Acrobat ver. 9 or higher

(www.adobe.com).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41654

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL BRADLEY MILLS, 

also known as Brad Mills,

also known as Squeeky,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CR-75-3

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael

Bradley Mills has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Mills has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein. The appeal is DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge 

Jermaine Brass 

Anthony Sgro, Esq. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Jason L. Stubbs, :

:

Plaintiff(s), :

: Case Number: 1:17cv721

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

Paul Bryant, et al., :

:

Defendant(s). :

ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United

States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge

reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on December 8, 2017 a Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 3). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 4).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and

considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court

does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1154

CARLOS ARMANDO AMADO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case

no. 03-CV-242, Judge David 0. Carter.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal due to

settlement,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

FEB 2 6 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

CC:	Vincent J. Belusko, Esq.

Joseph A. Micalief, Esq.

s20

FEB 2 6 2009

FEB 2 6 2009

JAN tIORIsALY

CLERK

ISSUED AS A MANDATE:
EXHIBIT 32.0
 Section 1350 CERTIFICATION
   (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Brendan J. McGillBrendan J. McGillExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to
Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and will be retained by Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.a.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of BE Semiconductor
Industries N.V. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Cor te Hennepe, Director of Finance of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 31, 2003                              /s/ Cor te Hennepe
                                                   ------------------

                                                   Cor te Hennepe
                                                   Director of Finance
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-31414) pertaining to the registration of 6,553,341 shares of common
stock; the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-40230) pertaining to the
United Shipping & Technology, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan; the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-30228 and 333-06269) pertaining to the United
Shipping & Technology, Inc. 1996 Director Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Stock
Option Plan; and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-34411) pertaining
to the registration of 1,538,474 shares of common stock, of our report dated
October 9, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of United
Shipping & Technology, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the
year ended June 30, 2001.


                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                            Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 9, 2001
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated(the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June  30,  2006 (the‘‘Report’’), I, Richard J. Moran, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                            |
|--|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

Date:    August  8,2006

|                       |  |  |                                                                      |
|-----------------------|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ RICHARD J. MORAN* |
| Name:                 |  |  | Richard J. Moran                                                     |
| Title:                |  |  | Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficerand Corporate Secretary |
|                       |

* Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by GentaIncorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Friedhelm Blobel, Chief Executive Officer, of SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       |  |                            
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010 |  | /s/ Friedhelm Blobel, Ph.D.
|                       |  | Friedhelm Blobel, Ph.D.    
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by SciClone Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Silicon Image, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidD. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

(2)         Theinformat**i**on contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
|   | /s/  David D. Lee |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | David D. Lee                |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer*   |
|   | March 12, 2004         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN RAMIREZ, as Elder of Wat Khmer

Vipassanaram and president of Khmer

Buddhist Association, the Spiritual Entity;

et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

DAVID J. PASTERNAK; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-56034

D.C. No. 8:09-cv-00245-DOCAGR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 

Plaintiffs appeal pro se from the district court’s orders dismissing their civil

rights action and awarding Rule 11 sanctions to court-appointed receiver David J.

FILED

JAN 07 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-56034

Pasternak. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim, New Alaska Dev. Corp. v.

Guetschow, 869 F.2d 1298, 1300 (9th Cir. 1989), and for abuse of discretion the

award of Rule 11 sanctions, Buster v. Greisen, 104 F.3d 1186, 1189 (9th Cir.

1997). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Pasternak

because the state court acted within its judicial discretion in appointing Pasternak

as receiver, was not itself acting in the clear absence of all jurisdiction, and

Pasternak was entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity for actions undertaken

in his capacity as receiver that were “functionally comparable to those of judges.” 

Curry v. Castillo (In re Castillo), 297 F.3d 940, 947 (9th Cir. 2002); see also

Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 356-57 (1978) (“A judge will not be deprived of

immunity because the action he took was in error, was done maliciously, or was in

excess of his authority; rather, he will be subject to liability only when he has acted

in the ‘clear absence of all jurisdiction.’”) (citation omitted); New Alaska Dev., 869

F.2d at 1303-04 & n.6 (concluding that state court-appointed receiver was entitled

to absolute immunity for allegedly mismanaging company assets). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding Rule 11 sanctions

to Pasternak based on its conclusion that plaintiffs’ complaint was frivolous. See
3 09-56034

Buster, 104 F.3d at 1190 (“Frivolous filings are those that are both baseless and

made without a reasonable and competent inquiry.”) (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Annual Report of Globix Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert M.
Dennerlein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: December 18, 2003
                                                /s/ Robert M. Dennerlein
                                                -------------------------
                                                Robert M. Dennerlein
                                                Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4588 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4588

  To provide that the detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo 
  Bay, Cuba remains open indefinitely and to require that individuals 
detained at the facility be tried only by military commission, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2010

  Mr. Rooney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that the detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo 
  Bay, Cuba remains open indefinitely and to require that individuals 
detained at the facility be tried only by military commission, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Detainee Trials at Gitmo Act''.

SEC. 2. DETENTION FACILITY AT NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA TO 
              REMAIN OPEN AND REQUIREMENT THAT INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT 
              THAT FACILITY BE TRIED ONLY BY MILITARY COMMISSION.

    (a) Detention Facility.--The detention facility at Naval Station, 
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba shall remain in use indefinitely by the United 
States as a detention facility.
    (b) Trial by Military Commission.--Any individual who is detained 
at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act, may only be tried by military commission under chapter 47A 
of title 10, United States Code. Any trial of such an individual by 
military commission shall be conducted at Naval Station, Guantanamo 
Bay, Cuba.
                                 <all>
```