alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.7
 NOTICE: THIS CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION PURSUANT  TO THE SOUTH CAROLINA UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT
 NONCOMPETITION,
SEVERANCE AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Between
THE SOUTH FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and JAMES W. TERRY, JR.
  W I T N E S S E T H
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Employment
 Definitions




---



##### 



=
   =
 (A)
    
    any employee plan established by the Company;(B)
    
    the Company or any of its affiliates (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act);
 2




---



##### 



(C)
    
    an underwriter temporarily holding securities
pursuant to an offering of such securities;(D)
    
    a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by stockholders of
the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of
the Company; or(E)
    
    merger, consolidation, or similar transaction
of the Company with any other corporation which is duly approved by the
stockholders of the Company;
  = =
  3




---



##### 



Duties
 4




---



##### 



Term A @
 Termination
 The Company
    5




---



##### 



=
 By Executive
  =
 6




---



##### 



=
 Compensation
 Annual Salary
 7




---



##### 



Annual Incentive Bonus
 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan
 Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan
 Stock Options and Restricted Stock
 Other Benefits
 Excess Parachute Payments.
 Confidentiality
 8




---



##### 



Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Agreement
    9




---



##### 



Trust
 Assignment
 Notices.
 To the Company:
    
    The South Financial Group, Inc.
Poinsett Plaza
104 South Main Street
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
Attn: William S. Hummers, IIITo Executive:
    
    James W. Terry, Jr.
236 Riverside Drive
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
  Provisions Severable
 Remedies in the Absence of a Change in Control
 10




---



##### 



=
 Remedies in the Event of a Change in Control
   11




---



##### 



Waiver
 Amendments and Modifications
 Entire Agreement =
 Governing Law
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 12




---



##### 



EXECUTIVE/s/ James W. Terry,
Jr.James W. Terry, Jr.THE SOUTH FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ William S. Hummers IIITitle:
 13
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4443 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4443

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the work 
              opportunity tax credit for hiring veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2010

Mrs. Halvorson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the work 
              opportunity tax credit for hiring veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Employment Today Act of 
2010'' or the ``VET Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT FOR HIRING VETERANS.

    (a) Increase in Credit for Disabled Veterans.--Paragraph (3) of 
section 51(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking ``$12,000'' and inserting ``$15,000''.
    (b) Increase in Credit for Other Veterans.--Paragraph (14) of 
section 51(d) of such Code is amended by redesignating subparagraph (B) 
as subparagraph (C) and by inserting after subparagraph (A) the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) Increase in limitation on wages taken into 
                account for unemployed veterans.--In the case of any 
                unemployed veteran who is treated as a member of a 
                targeted group by reason of subparagraph (A) and who 
                begins work for the employer after the date of the 
                enactment of this subparagraph, subsection (b)(3) shall 
                be applied by substituting `$7,500' for `$6,000'.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to individuals who begin work for the employer after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Sunset.--The authority under this section will expire on 
December 31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.02

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of 
AMISYS Managed Care Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report, dated February 11, 
1997, on our audits of the balance sheets of AMISYS Managed Care Systems, Inc. 
("the Company"), as of December 31, 1995 and December 31, 1996, and the related 
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the period 
from May 27, 1994 to December 31, 1994 and for the years ended December 31, 1995
and 1996, respectively, and the statements of operations, stockholders' equity 
(deficit) and cash flows of American International Healthcare, Inc. ("AIHI"), a
wholly owned subsidiary of American International Group, Inc. for the period
from January 1, 1994 to May 26, 1994 and the related financial statement
schedule, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also 
consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the 
registration statement.

Washington, D.C.
March 6, 1997
APPENDIX VI 

METHOD 315 ANALYTICAL REPORT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         303,423                 417,666
<SECURITIES>                                    20,700                  20,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,307                  17,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,500                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               389,063                 499,868
<PP&E>                                         753,533                 611,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                 227,166                 174,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 973,373                 995,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          663,903                 686,029
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    21,473,459              20,950,152
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,163,984)            (20,640,830)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   973,378                 995,351
<SALES>                                        163,600                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,600                       0
<CGS>                                          101,942                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               584,812                 223,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                   2,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (523,154)                 225,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (523,154)               (225,732)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (523,154)               (225,732)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.007)                 (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.000)                 (0.000)


</TABLE>
J

- A04023

- 19

2019 PA Super 167

____________________________________ * Retired Senior Jud ge assigned to the Superior Court. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

PI DELTA PSI, INC.

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 458 EDA 2018

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence January 8, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County Criminal Division at

No(s): CP

- 45

- CR

- 0002578

- 2015

BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., KUNSELMAN, J., and COLINS*, J.

DISSENTING OPINION BY COLINS, J.: FILED MAY 2 3 , 2019

I must respectfully dissent from the scholarly and well authored opinion

of the majority as to its affirmance of the trial court’s exclusion of David L.

Westol’s testimony regarding the Corporation’s having met a “national

standard of care” regarding the p romulgation and enforcement of an anti

hazing policy. In the instant matter the prosecution’s theory as to the guilt of

the National Fraternity was basically one of vicarious liability and to exclude

the proffered testimony, in my opinion, amounts to a ma nifest abuse of

discretion.

I would vacate the conviction and remand for a new trial allowing the

Westol testimony.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **/**s**/**Michael                  Barth |
|-------------------------------------------|
| Michael                  Barth            |
| Chief                  Financial Officer  |
| May                  20, 2008             |

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ERIC MITCHELL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 20 2 2

- 2667

[ August 15, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Daniel A. Casey , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 19

- 010544CF10A; 20

- 004306CF10A; 20

- 005202CF10A; 22

- 003469CF10A; and 22

- 006975CF10A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo

, Assistant Public Defender , West Palm Beach, for appellant

.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and A lexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General , West Palm Beach, for appellee

.

P ER C URI A M

.
Affirmed

.

M AY , C IKLIN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                  
<ARTICLE>                       7
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
                                        
<S>                                     <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,199,084
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                             0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                               0
<EQUITIES>                                   57,328
<MORTGAGE>                                        0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                     0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                            1,459,312
<CASH>                                       28,335
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       96,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            2,553,777
<POLICY-LOSSES>                           1,092,282
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         507,046
<POLICY-OTHER>                                    0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                             0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              92,000
<COMMON>                                        376
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  402,214
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              2,553,777
<PREMIUMS>                                  493,054
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          73,528
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            3,010
<OTHER-INCOME>                                4,400
<BENEFITS>                                  442,853
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 122,813
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         87,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (90,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (40,833)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (50,042)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (50,042)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (1.34)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              483,539
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         297,400
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                 0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           66,070
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            216,534
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             632,850
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                     134,515
                                        


</TABLE>
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00214-CV 

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING & COMPLIANCE SERVICES, INC., APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

JORISHIE PROPERTIES, INC. D/B/A ROBIN LANCE REALTY, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 368th District Court 

Williamson County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 17-0172-C368, Honorable Rick J. Kennon, Presiding 

 

June 26, 2019 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant, Government Contracting & Compliance Services, Inc., filed a notice of 

appeal without paying the requisite filing fee. By letter dated June 12, 2019, the Clerk of 

this Court notified appellant that unless it was excused from paying court costs under 

Appellate Rule 20.1, failure to pay the filing fee by June 24 would result in dismissal of 

the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 42.3(c). To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, 

communicated to the Clerk that it is presumed indigent under Appellate Rule 20.1, or 

sought leave to proceed without payment of court costs. TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1.
2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules and 

a notice from the Clerk requiring action within a specified time, we dismiss the appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Per Curiam
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


 





CORPORATION


INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COMMON STOCK


SEE REVERSE
FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


CUSIP 004446
10 0


THIS
CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of


SPECIMEN


full-paid
and non-assessable shares of the par value of One Cent ($.01) each of the COMMON STOCK of


ACETO
CORPORATION


transferable
on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized upon surrender of this Certificate, properly
endorsed.


This
Certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject all of the provisions of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation, and all amendments thereof, copies of which are on the file at the office of the Corporation.
This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrant.


WITNESS
the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


COUNTERSIGNED
AND REGISTERED:


AMERICAN
STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC


(Brooklyn,
NY)


BY
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE


Dated:


PRESIDENT


TREASURER


ACETO
CORPORATION CORPORATE SEAL 1947 NEWYORK


©SECURITY-COLUMBIAN UNITED
STATES BANKNOTE
COMPANY 1DE0







 






     


     


    

 


 


 


The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed
as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


TEN COM - as tenants in common
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- Custodian


TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties
(Cust) (Minor)


JT TEN - as joint tenants with
right under Uniform Gifts to Minors


of survivorship and not as tenants


Act


in common (State)


Additional abbreviations may
also be used though not in the above list.


For
value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


PLEASE INSERT
SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


(PLEASE PRINT
OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)


Shares


of the capital
stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


Attorney


to transfer
the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated


NOTICE:
THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR,
WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


Signature(s) Guaranteed:


THE
SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT
UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM). PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.


KEEP
THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR DESTROYED, THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY
AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE.
#### People v Robinson,

No. 90912;

Court of Appeals No. 124746.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

AMERICAN POWER, LLC,

Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:17-cv-347

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

v.
DOUGLAS O. HARRIS, et a/.,

Defendants.

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #42);
OVERRULING MIKE MORLEY’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #21)
AND SCOTT LARSON’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #22)

Defendants Mike Morley and Scott Larson each filed a Motion to Dismiss,
Docs. ##21 and 22 respectively. Both argued that this Court lacked personal
jurisdiction over them. Morley also argued that Plaintiff had failed to state a
plausible claim against him, individually. On August 2, 2018, United States
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington issued a Report and Recommendations, Doc.
#42, in which she recommended that the Court deny both Motions to Dismiss. '

Although the parties were notified of their right to file Objections to the Report and

' Morley also joined in the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Douglas O.

Harris, Murray J. Crane, Dektrix, LLC, Dektrix Transportation Services LLC and
Dektrix Intermodal LLC, Doc. #20. The arguments raised in that Motion are the
subject of a separate Report and Recommendations, Doc. #43.


Recommendations, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no Objections
were filed within the time allotted.

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by Magistrate
Judge Ovington in the Report and Recommendations, Doc. #42, the Court
ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety, and OVERRULES Defendant Mike
Morley’s Motion to Dismiss, Doc. #21, and Defendant Scott Larson’s Motion to

Dismiss, Doc. #22.

Date: September 18, 2018 Lia oe

WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

4/26/2019

 Southern District of Ohio

Renee D. Daniel

3:18-cv-12

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations in its entirety; ALJ’s decision denying Plaintiff’s

application for benefits are hereby AFFIRMED. The instant case is TERMINATED on the docket of the

United States District Court for the

✔ Thomas M. Rose

Report and Recommendations
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

9/26/19

 Southern District of Ohio

Rebecca Bowen

3:18-CV-48

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Defendant Commissioner and against Plaintiff; Affirming Commissioner's decision that

Plaintiff was not disabled and , therefore, not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act

✔ Walter H. Rice