SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

THRU: 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Maryland 19103 

Technical Support Document (TSD)- Adequacy Findings for the Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) in the 2006 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.s) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Maintenance Plan for the HarrisburgCarlisle-Lebanon-York, Pennsylvania (PA) 2006 PM2.s Nonattainment Area 

GregoryBecoat 9' 4/~J~~ Office of Air Program Planning (3AP30) 

Administrative Record for the Adequacy Findings for the Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) in the 2006 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.s) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Maintenance Plan for the HarrisburgCarlisle-Lebano,n-York0

Pe1msylvania (PA) 2006 PM2.s Nonattainment Area 

~'f.._~~ 9/6/1( 

Cristina F emandez, Associate Director 

Office of Air Program Planning (3AP30) 

I. Background 

On November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published 

air quality area designations for the 2006 PM2.s NAAQS. In that rulemaking action, EPA 

designated the Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanon-York Area (Harrisburg-York Area) as nonattainment 

for the 2006 daily PM2.s standard. The Harrisburg-York Area includes Dauphin, Lebanon, 

Cumberland, and York Counties in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It is important to note 

that York County was designated as a single-county nonattainment area for purposes of the 1997 

annual PM2.s NAAQS, but was <;:ombined with Cumberiand, Dauphin, and Lebanon Counties to 

form the multi-county Harrisburg-York Area for purposes of the 2006 daily PM2.s NAAQS. On 

March 29, 2012 (77 FR 18922), EPA determined that the Harrisburg-York Area had attained the 

2006 daily PM2.s NAAQS based on quality-assured, quality-controlled, and certified ambient air 

monitoring data that show the Area has monitored attainment based on 2008 through 2010 data. 

II. Transportation Conformity Requirements 

Transportation conformity is required under section 176( c) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to ensure 

that federally supported highway, transit projects, and other activities are consistent with 
(conform to) the purpose ofthe State Implementation Plan (SIP). The CAA requires federal 

actions in nonattainment and maintenance areas to "conform to" the goals of SIP. This means 

that such actions will not cause or contribute to violations of a NAAQS; worsen the severity of 

an existing violation; or delay timely attainment of any NAAQS or any interim milestone. 

Actions involving Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or Federal Transit Administration 

(FTA) funding or approval are subject to the Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR part 93, 

subpart A). Under this rule, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) in nonattainment and 

maintenance areas coordinate with state air quality and transportation agencies, EPA, FHW A, 

and FT A to demonstrate that their metropolitan transportation plans and transportation 

improvement plans (TIPs) conform to applicable SIPs. This is typically determined by showing 

that estimated emissions from existing and planned highway and transit systems are less than or 

equal to the MVEBs contained in a SIP. 

Transportation agencies in Pennsylvania are responsible for making timely transportation 

conformity determinations. The responsible agencies in the Harrisburg-York Area, designated as 

the MPO under federal transportation planning requirements, are: 1) for Cumberland and 

Dauphin Counties: the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission; 2) for Lebanon County: the 

Lebanon County MPO; and 3) for York County: the York Area MPO. Separate conformity 

budgets are being established for each MPO. The transportation conformity regulations (40 CFR 

§93.124(d)) allow a SIP to establish MVEBs for each MPO if a nonattainment area includes 

more than one MPO. The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation has requested separate 

budgets to allow the planning organizations to move their transportation conformity 

determinations through the approval processes separately. 

For MVEBs to be approvable, they must meet, at a minimum, EPA's adequacy criteria found at 

40 CFR 93 .118( e)( 4 ). EPA's adequacy criteria are: (1) the submitted control strategy 

implementation plan was endorsed by the Governor or designee and was subject to a State public 

hearing; (2) consultation among Federal, State, and local agencies occurred; full implementation 

plan documentation was provided to EPA; and EPA's stated concerns, if any, were addressed 

before the control strategy implementation plan was submitted; (3) the MVEBs are clearly 

identified and precisely quantified; ( 4) the MVEBs, when considered together with all other 

emissions sources, are consistent with applicable requirements for maintenance; (5) the MVEBs 

are consistent with and clearly related to the emissions inventory and the control measures in the 

submitted control strategy implementation plan; and (6) revisions to previously submitted 

maintenance plans explain and document any changes to previously submitted budgets and 

control measures; impacts on point and area source emissions; any changes to established safety 

margins; and reasons for the changes (including the basis for any changes related to emission 

factors or estimates of vehicle miles traveled). 

III. Review of the Submitted Modeling Utilizing the Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator 

(MOVES2010) 

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (P ADEP) utilized MOVES20 1 Oa to 

produce MVEBs for years 2017 and 2025. To utilize the MOVES2010a model, several different 

models were used to provide the necessary inputs into MOVES2010a. One of the models, 

PPSUITE, was utilized to provide inputs as well as to post-process the output files from 

2 
MOVES2010a. 

The appropriate traffic related inputs which were processed by PPSUITE were input into 

MOVES2010a. Additional traffic related inputs as well as non-traffic related inputs were 

provided as well. The data was input into MOVES2010a via the county data manager. The 

county data manager is a function of the MOVES2010a model which allows county specific data 

inputs to be converted into a usable form by MOVES201 Oa. At that point a Run Specification 

(RunSpec), which is a function ofMOVES2010a that allows the user to input necessary 

parameters into the model, was created and run in batch mode. The outputs were provided as an 

inventory because vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and vehicle population were provided to 

MOVES2010a. 

EPA reviewed the modeling methodology utilized by P ADEP and all modeling related 

information to produce the MVEBs for years 2017 and 2025. EPA found that all necessary and 

required modeling procedures were followed in the production of the 2017 and 2025 MVEBs 

which were produced using MOVES2010a. 

IV. Administrative Requirements for Making Adequacy Findings 

EPA followed the process for determining the adequacy of the submitted SIP MVEBs in 

accordance with the procedures listed in the January 2008 Conformity Regulations contained in 

40 CFR part 93, 118(t) "Adequacy review process for implementation plan submissions." EPA 

will be issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for a 30-day public comment period 

soliciting public comment for the approvability of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's SIP 

submission. The NPR also proposes approval of the MVEBs for milestone year 2017 and the 

out-year 2025 for the Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanon-York, P A 2006 PMz.s Nonattainment Area for 

PMz.s and nitrogen oxides (NOx) for transportation conformity purposes. The public will have 

the opportunity to comment on the adequacy/approvability of the budgets in the SIP revision. 

Following EPA's public comment period, responses to any comments received on the proposed 

mobile ·budgets in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's SIP will be addressed in the final 

rulemaking notice. 

Shown in Tables 1, 2, and 3 are the budgets from the Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanon-York, PA 

Maintenance Plan for milestone year 2017 and the out-year 2025 for PMz.s and NOx. The 

MVEBs will be applied to all future transportation conformity determinations and analyses for 

the 2006 daily PMz.s NAAQS. 

Table 1. On-Road MVEBs Contained in the Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanon-York, PA 

2006 PM2.sNonattainment Area Maintenance Plan for Cumberland and Dauphin 

Counties 

Year Motor Vehicle Emissions Mobile Vehicle Emissions 

Budget for PMz.s On-Road Budget for NOx On-Road 

Emissions (tons per year) Emissions (tons per year) 

2017 365 10,287 

2025 275 7,024 

3 
Table 2. On-Road MVEBs Contained in the Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanon-York, PA 

2006 PM2.sNonattainment Area Maintenance Plan for Lebanon County 

Year Motor Vehicle Emissions Mobile Vehicle Emissions 

Budget for PM2.s On-Road Budget for NOxOn-Road 

Emissions (tons per year) Emissions (tons per year) 

2017 76 2,252 

2025 52 1,446 

Table 3. On-Road MVEBs Contained in the Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanon-York, P A 

2006 PM2.5Nonattainment Area Maintenance Plan for York County 

Year Motor Vehicle Emissions Mobile Vehicle Emissions 

Budget for PM2.s On-Road Budget for NOxOn-Road 

Emissions (tons per year) Emissions (tons per year) 

2017 192 5,390 

2025 144 3,398 

V. Evaluation of the Adequacy of the MVEBs in the Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanon-York, 

P A Maintenance Plan for the 2006 PM2.s NAAQS 

In this TSD, EPA is evaluating the MVEBs associated with the Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanonyork, P A Maintenance Plan for conformity purposes. EPA is using the evaluation criteria 

detailed in the Transportation Conformity Rule, 40 CFRpart 93.102(b)(2)(v), 93.102(b)(2)(v), 

93.102(b)(3), and part 93, 93.118(e)4 through 93.118(e)5. The evaluation is presented in Table 

4, below. 

Table 4. Adequacy of the MVEBs Contained in the Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanon-York, 

P A Maintenance Plan for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS 

Transportation Coufi)lmity Review Criteria Was the Criterion Satis£ed? 

Rule If Yes How was this Criteria 

40 CFR Part 93. 3.118 a isfied? 

93.1 02(b )(2)(iv) Have EPA and the Neither EPA nor the 

Commonwealth made a Commonwealth have made 

finding that N Ox is an such a finding. 

insignificant contributor to 

the direct mobile PM 

emissions? 

93.102(b)(2)(v) Has EPA or the Neither EPA nor the 

Commonwealth made a Commonwealth have made 

finding that volatile organic any findings that VOCs, SOx, 

4 
compounds (VOCs), Sulfur or NH3 are significant 

Oxides (SOx) or Ammonia contributors to the PM2.s 

(NH3) as precursors to be a mobile emissions. 

significant contributor to the 

mobile PM2.s emissions? 

93.1 02(b )(3) Has the EPA or the Neither EPA nor the 

Commonwealth made a Commonwealth have made 

finding that re-entrained road such a finding. 

dust is a significant 

contributor to the PM mobile 

emissions? 

Sec. 93.118( e)( 4)(i) Was the submitted revised Yes. The Harrisburgplan endorsed by the Carlisle-Lebanon-York, PA 

Governor (or his or her Maintenance Plan was 

designee) and subject to a endorsed and submitted as a 

Commonwealth public SIP revision by the 

hearing? Governor's designee, the 

Secretary of Pennsylvania 

Department of Environmental 

Protection, E. Christopher 

Abruzzo. A public hearing 

on the SIP proposal 

scheduled for February 26, 

2014, was cancelled because 

no one expressed interest in 

presenting testimony or 

attending the hearing. 

Sec. 93.118(e)(4)(ii) Before the maintenance plan Yes. Consultation has 

was submitted to EPA, did occurred among all required 

consultation between federal, federal, State and local 

State and local agencies agencies. 

occur; was full 

implementation plan 

documentation provided to 

EPA, and was EPA's stated 

concerns, if any, addressed? 

Sec. 93.118(e)(4)(iii) Was the motor vehicle Yes, the budgets are clearly 

emissions budget(s) clearly identified on pages 34-35 of 

identified and precisely the Harrisburg-Carlislequantified? Lebanon-York, P A 

Maintenance Plan prepared 

by the Pennsylvania 

5 
Department of Environmental 

Protection. 

Sec. 93.118(e)(4)(iv) Is the motor vehicle EPA believes the budgets can 

emissions budget(s), when be declared adequate because 

considered together with all in conjunction with the other 

other emission reductions, emission reductions, they 

consistent with applicable demonstrate continued 

requirements for maintenance for years 201 7 

maintenance? and 2025. 

Sec. 93.118(e)(4)(v) Is the motor vehicle EPA believes that the budgets 

emissions budget( s) are clearly related 'to the 

consistent with and clearly emissions inventory and the 

related to the emissions control measures in the SIP 

inventory and the control submittal. 

measures in the Plan? 

Sec. 93.118(e)(4)(vi) Revisions to previously Yes, the Harrisburg-Carlislesubmitted attainment Lebanon-York, P A 

demonstrations: explain and Maintenance Plan provides 

document any changes to new MVEBs for years 2017 

previously submitted budgets and 2025 for PM2.s and NOx. 

and control measures; The addition of safety 

impacts on point and area margins to the MVEBs is 

source emissions; any consistent with continued 

changes to established safety attainment. 

margins (see Sec. 93.1 01 for 

definition); and reasons for 

the changes (including the 

basis for any changes related 

to emission factors or 

estimates of vehicle miles 

traveled). 

Sec. 93.118(e)(5) Did they provide and we Yes 

reviewed public comments 

and the Commonwealth's 

responses to those comments 

with the submitted control 

strategy SIP? 

6 
VI. Findings 

Based upon our review and evaluation of the MVEBs contained in the Maintenance Plan for the 

Harrisburg-Carlisle-Lebanon-York, PA 2006 PM2.s NAAQS Nonattainment Area, EPA finds the 

MVEBs adequate for conformity purposes and recommends that the MVEBs be SIP approved. 

7