alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A GENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLICY

M EMORANDUM SUBJECT: Transmittal to Docket: Summary of t he March 1 6 , 2011, Public Meeting in

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s Implementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review FROM: Stuart C. Miles - McLean

Office of Regulatory Policy and Management TO: Public Docket #EPA - HQ - OA - 2011 - 0156: Im p roving Regulations: General As called for b y President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic review of existing significant regulations," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering "how best to promote retrospective analy sis of rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify , streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned." As part of its retrospective re view of regulatio ns, EPA convened public meetings around the country to gather input on how we might design the plan we will use to periodicall y review our regulations. T his Memo transmits to the docket a summary of the public meeting held on March 1 6 , 20 11, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant: Eltrax Systems, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------

Eltrax Technology Services Group, Inc.
--------------------------------------
(Georgia)
President: Edward Barrett
EIN: 58-5457009

     Eltrax ASP Group, LLC
     (Georgia)
     President: Denise Grey
     EIN: 58-2513557


Squirrel Systems, Inc.
----------------------
(Georgia)
President: Barry Logan
EIN: 62-1395695

     Squirrel Systems of Canada, Ltd.
     (Canada)
     President: Barry Logan


Senercomm, Inc.
---------------
(Florida)
President: Larry Gomez
EIN: 65-0162025


Eltrax Customer Care Group, Inc.
--------------------------------
(Georgia)
President: John Butler
EIN: 58-2157408

<PAGE>

Eltrax International, Inc.
--------------------------
President: Don Hallacy
Vice President: John Picardi
EIN: 25-1369276

     Eltrax Hospitality Technologies PTE Ltd. (Singapore)
            Eltrax SBD.BHD (Malaysia)

     Eltrax Hospitality Scandinavia AS (Norway)

     Eltrax Pty. Ltd. (Australia)

     Eltrax Hospitality Ltd. (Hong Kong)

     Eltrax Holdings AG (Swiss)
            Eltrax AG (Swiss)
            Eltrax Hospitality U.K. Ltd. (UK)

     Eltrax Group, Inc. (Pennsylvania, Belgian Branch Office)


Eltrax Hospitality Group, Inc.
------------------------------
President: Barry Logan
EIN: 58-1386264

                                       2
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Form 10-Q/A of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/    JAMES A. FONTAINE                 
|                                         
|James A. Fontaine Chief Executive Officer



Date:
April 29, 2004
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6550** 

JOHN HILL , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

**No. 14**  **- 6553** 

JOHN HILL , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:05

- cv - 00015

- AWA

- TEM; 2:05

- cv - 00086

- AWA

- TEM )

Submitted : August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.2 Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. John Hill, Appellant Pro Se. David Michael Uberman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: John Hill seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order s denying relief on his motions to set aside judgments in two 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) p roceedings . The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrati ng that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court de nies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have indepen dently reviewed the record and conclude that Hill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny certificate s of appealability and dismiss the appeal s . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal4 contentions are adequately presen ted in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for
the period ended June 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The amended Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ VINCENT A. WASIKVincent A. WasikChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 27, 2008


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Velocity Express Corporation and will be retained by Velocity Express
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
9137 E MineraI Circle, Suite 101
Fnglewood,Colorado  80112
303-792-3900, Fax 303-792-2811


September 9,1999

Securities and Exchange
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

     Re: California Applied Research, Inc.
     SEC File No.: 33-98526


Ladies and Gentlemen:
Commission

Relative to the change in auditors, we have read the statements made by
California Applied Research, Inc. We understand that these statements are
being filed with the Commission, pursuant to Item 8 of the Company's Form 10-
KSB report to be filed in September 1999. We agree with the statements
concerning our firm in such Form 10-KSB.

Sincerely,

DAVIS & CO., CPAs, P.C.

Carol A. Davis
Certified Public Accountant

cc: California Applied Research, Inc.
  - J. Michael Spinal
#### Samuel Kindy v. Irwin Green and another.

*Replevin: Undivided interest: Tenants in common.*Replevin 'will not lie for an undivided interest in a chattel •where the execution of the writ will operate to deprive a co-tenant whose title is not disputed of his right of possession.

*Heard and decided June 18.*

Error to Kalamazoo Circuit.

*311This was an action of replevin, brought by Green and McIntyre against Kindy, for an undivided one-half of a portable saw-mill, which interest they claimed to have purchased of him, the other undivided interest belonging to a third party. The cansé was tried by a jury and verdict rendered for the plaintiffs. The defendant moved in arrest of judgment, on the ground that replevin would not lie for an undivided interest in property in its nature indivisible, and his-motion having been denied and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs for the value of the property, assessed at one thousand one hundred and sixty-six dollars and sixty-six cents, he brought error.

*O. T. Tidhill,*for plaintiff in error, was stopped by the court.

No counsel appeared for defendants in error.

The Oouet

held that replevin would not lie for an undivided interest in a chattel where the execution of the writ will operate to deprive a co-tenant whose title is undisputed of his right of possession.

Judgment reversed, with costs of both courts.
LEASE AGREEMENT

This  commercial  lease  is  entered  into  between   Industrial   Management  &
Engineering,  Inc. ("Landlord") and Covol Technologies,  Inc.,  ("Tenant").  The
Landlord  hereby leases the below described  commercial  property to the Tenant.
The Tenant hereby accepts the lease. The terms of the lease are as follows:

1. The lease  pertains to the property,  including the building and the adjacent
paved parking area located at 3280 North Frontage Road,  Lehi,  Utah 84043,  but
excluding  the  currently  fenced off portion on the north of the property  (the
"Premises").

2.  The  initial  term of the  lease  shall  be for a  period  of  three  years,
commencing  on the 1st day of  August,  1997 and  ending on the 31st day of July
2000.  Thereafter,  the lease shall automatically extend for successive one-year
periods  unless prior to the end of any lease year,  Tenant shall give  Landlord
60-days written notice of it intent to terminate the lease.

3. The Tenant shall pay Landlord,  the monthly rent of $5,000.00  payable on the
first day of every  month.  There  will be a late fee of $100 if the rent is not
paid by the 5th of the month, plus $10 for each additional day until paid. After
the initial  term of the lease,  the amount of the rent will  increase by 5% per
annum.  If Landlord  builds  additional  commercial  rental  space on the fenced
portion of the Premises and Tenant desires to lease those structures,  the terms
for such additional space shall be agreed upon by the parties.

4. The Tenant shall be responsible for providing all utilities,  property taxes,
and maintenance of the Premises.

5. The  Landlord  shall  provide  such  additional  parking  space as Tenant may
require, at no additional cost to the Tenant.

6. The Tenant agrees to return  possession of the Premises at the  conclusion of
the lease in its present condition, except for normal wear and tear.

7. The Premises shall be used for the purpose of conducting the proper  business
activities  of Tenant which include but are not limited to the  development  and
world-wide commercialization of its patented agglomeration technology.

8. The  Tenant  shall not  assign  or  sublease  the  Premises  without  written
permission of the Landlord.

9. No material or  structural  alterations  of the Premises will be made without
the prior written permission of the Landlord.

10. The Tenant  will  comply  with all  zoning,  health,  environmental  and use
ordinances.

<PAGE>

11. In the event that legal  action is necessary  to enforce any  provisions  of
this contract, attorney fees may be recovered by the prevailing party.

12. This lease is subject to the formal  transfer of  ownership  of the Premises
from Tenant to Landlord.


Signed this 7th day of November, 1997.

Landlord                                             Tenant
IME                                                  COVOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



By: /s/ Gerald Larson                                By:/s/ Stanley Kimball
   -----------------------                              ---------------------
Its:  Director                                       Its: CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4587 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4587

   To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require spending 
   limits be imposed when the statutory limit on the public debt is 
                               increased.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2010

Mr. Neugebauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for 
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require spending 
   limits be imposed when the statutory limit on the public debt is 
                               increased.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cap Spending to Reduce Borrowing 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SPENDING LIMITS WHEN DEBT CEILING INCREASED.

    (a) In General.--Section 312 of the Congressional Budget Act of 
1974 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Point of Order To Require Spending Limits Whenever Debt 
Ceiling Increases.--(1) Except as provided by paragraph (2), it shall 
not be in order in the House of Representatives or the Senate to 
consider any bill or joint resolution, or amendment thereto or 
conference report thereon, that increases the statutory limit on the 
public debt unless such bill, joint resolution, amendment, or 
conference report, as the case may be, includes limits on the total 
level of discretionary spending and on the total level of direct 
spending for each of 10 consecutive fiscal years beginning with the 
first fiscal year in which the increase in the statutory limit on the 
public debt would occur.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any measure that increases 
the statutory limit on the public debt if statutory limits on the total 
level of discretionary spending and on the total level of direct 
spending for each of 10 consecutive fiscal years beginning with the 
first fiscal year in which the increase in the statutory limit on the 
public debt would occur are in place.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsections (c)(1) and (d)(2) of section 
904 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are each amended by 
inserting ``312(g),'' after ``310(d)(2),''.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF GEPHARDT RULE.

    The Rules of the House of Representatives are amended by repealing 
rule XXVIII (relating to the statutory limit on public debt) and 
redesignating rule XXIX as rule XXVIII.
                                 <all>
```
#### Gary STRATTON, Jr. and Bill STRATTON v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA

85-74

692 S.W.2d 230

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered June 24, 1985

*Garland Q. Ridenour, Ltd.,*for petitioner.

No response by respondent.

Per Curiam.

Petitioners ask that we review the decision rendered by the Arkansas Court of Appeals in CÁ84-230 because it involves a legal issue of major importance. Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 29. 6. provides, in part, the following:

> Except in cases appealed to the Court of Appeals from the Workers Compensation Commission or the Employment Security Board of Review, no petition for review on the ground that the case involves an issue of significant public interest or a legal principle of major importance, as specified in subparagraph 4(b) of this Rule, will be considered unless the party petitioning for review filed in the Court of Appeals, before the submission of the case to *342that court, a motion asking that the case be certified to the Supreme Court on that ground, with a certificate of counsel that the motion is filed in the good faith belief that the case should be so certified.

The record contains no evidence that such a motion was made.

Review denied.

George Rose Smith, Justice, not participating.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 79

Unemployed

Number in thousands

75 years and over

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU03024942Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Unemployment Level - 75 yrs. & over

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:10:22 PM)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-275

Judge Marbley

Lamonte Christopher Harris 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 19) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The Court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: January 26, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00658]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

[Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2020-0109; FF09E22000 FXES11130900000 223]
RIN 1018-BC98


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removal of 23 
Extinct Species From the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 
and Plants; Ivory-Billed Woodpecker; Correction

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period and announcement of 
public hearing; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a date in a document that reopened a 
comment period on a proposed rule and announced a public hearing. On 
January 11, 2022, we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announced 
that we are reopening the public comment period on our September 30, 
2021, proposal to remove 23 species from the Federal Lists of 
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (List) due to extinction. 
We also announced a public hearing on the proposal to remove the ivory-
billed woodpecker from the List and stated that the comment period 
reopening is only for the ivory-billed woodpecker proposed delisting. 
The document stated that the public hearing would take place on January 
26, 2021. The correct date is January 26, 2022.

DATES: January 14, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Maclin, Branch of Delisting 
and Foreign Species, Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES, Falls Church, VA 22041; 
telephone 703-358-2646. If you use a telecommunications device for the 
deaf, call the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In proposed rule document FR Doc. 2022-00322 in the issue of 
January 11, 2022, on page 1390 in the third column, make the following 
correction in DATES:
    Public hearing: On January 26, 2022, we will hold a public hearing 
on the ivory-billed woodpecker proposed delisting from 6:00 to 7:30 
p.m., Central Time, using the Zoom platform (for more information, see 
Public Hearing, below).

Madonna Baucum,
Regulations and Policy Chief, Division of Policy, Economics, Risk 
Management, and Analytics, Joint Administrative Operations, U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-00658 Filed 1-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, George Morgenstern, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ GEORGE MORGENSTERN
----------------------------------
George Morgenstern
Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2004

                                     - 19 -
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

**Subsidiaries of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc.**

AEROSPACE DISPLAY SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

AUDIO INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Arkansas corporation.

AVTECH CORPORATION, a Washington corporation.

CARL F. BOOTH & CO., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

COLTECH, INC., a Texas corporation.

CUSTOM WOODWORK & PLASTICS, LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany.

DAH–IP HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DAH–IP INFINITY, INC., a Delaware corporation.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT FURNITURE CO., LP, a Texas limited partnership.

DECRANE AIRCRAFT SEATING COMPANY, INC., a Wisconsin corporation.

DECRANE CABIN INTERIORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

DETTMERS INDUSTRIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

HOLLINGSEAD INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation.

PATS, INC., a Maryland corporation.

PCI NEWCO, INC., a Delaware corporation.

PPI HOLDINGS, INC., a Kansas corporation.

PRECISION PATTERN, INC., a Kansas corporation.

THE INFINITY PARTNERS, LTD., a Texas limited partnership.

TRI–STAR ELECTRONICS EUROPE S.A., a Swiss company.

TRI–STAR ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Californiacorporation.

TRI–STAR TECHNOLOGIES, a California general partnership.

 

----