alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE:

FABIOLA SANCHEZ,

RELATOR.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00161-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Fabiola Sanchez has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against the Honorable 

Jesus Rodriguez, judge of El Paso County Court at Law No. 5, contending that the trial court 

abused its discretion by issuing a temporary order. The petition is denied.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator generally must meet two requirements. First, 

the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of 

Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004)(orig. proceeding). Second, the relator must demonstrate 

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 135-36. The burden is on the relator to show he 

is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005)(orig. 

proceeding).
2

After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude that Relator has failed to 

show entitlement to mandamus relief on this record. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus.

June 23, 2021

YVONNE T, RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the use in this Annual
report on Form 10-K of Premier Exhibitions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended February 28, 2009 of our report included herein dated May 6, 2008 with respect to the balance sheet of Premier Exhibitions, Inc. as of February 29,
2008 and the related statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended February 29, 2008 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Premier Exhibitions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) for the year ended February 28, 2009 of our report dated May 6, 2008 incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-148756; and Form S-8 Nos. 333-140477 and 333-138534) relating to the consolidated balance
sheet of the Company as of February 28, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended February 29, 2008 and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the Company as of February 29, 2008.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/ Kempisty & Company            
|Certified Public Accountants, P.C.
|New York, New York                
|                                  
|May 7, 2009
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Velocity Express Corporation



|                                                                |  |                       
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Direct or Indirect Subsidiaries of Velocity Express Corporation |  | State of Incorporation
|Corporate Express Distribution Services, Inc.                   |  | Michigan              
|Velocity Express Leasing, Inc.                                  |  | Delaware              
|Velocity Express, Inc.                                          |  | Delaware              
|VXP Leasing Mid-West, Inc.                                      |  | Delaware              
|VXP Mid-West, Inc.                                              |  | Delaware              
|VXP Leasing Mid-West, Inc.                                      |  | Delaware              
|USDS Canada LTD                                                 |  | Canada                
|Velocity Express Canada LTD                                     |  | Canada                
|CD&L, Inc.                                                      |  | Delaware              
|Clayton/National Courier Systems, Inc.                          |  | Missouri              
|Click Messenger Service, Inc.                                   |  | New Jersey            
|KBD Services, Inc.                                              |  | North Carolina        
|Olympic Courier Systems, Inc.                                   |  | New York              
|Securities Courier Corporation                                  |  | New York              
|Silver Star Express, Inc.                                       |  | Florida               
|CD&L Air Freight, Inc.                                          |  | New Jersey
#### People v Pider,

No. 90857;

Court of Appeals No. 133468.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**RULE      13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934      AND**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|                                   | (1)                                                                                                | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | (2)                                                                                                | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|                                   |                                                                                               |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| Date:                November 19, 2007 | By:                                                                                      | /s/                Seung Kwon Noh                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                   | Seung                Kwon Noh                                                                      |
|                                   | President                & Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer) |

----
#### People v Alcorta,

No. 90608;

Court of Appeals No. 118167. Reconsideration denied November 25, 1991.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 6,
2012 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2012-3 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as
in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of
the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                         |  | 
|                                     |  |                                         | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 25, 2016
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection  with the Quarterly Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on  Form 10-QSB for the three months ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Richard Gagne, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: January19, 2005

| /s/ Richard Gagne                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Richard Gagne, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal        Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial        Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:18-mj-00008-CMV Doc #: 15 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 55
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:18-mj-00008-CMV Doc #: 15 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 56
#### Mamie Karger *vs.*Eva M. Chase & others.

June 26, 1940.

*H. M. Pakulski,*for the defendant George M. Chase.

*A. W. Ingalls,*for the defendant Eva M. Chase, submitted a brief.

*B. N. Vernon,*for the plaintiff.

Decree affirmed with costs. The agreement directly between husband and wife, made on November 30, 1938, was ineffectual. Mr. Buzzell as trustee for the wife remained entitled to the share of the estate of Mulleavey assigned to him by the separation agreement of May 2, 1938. The beneficial interest in that share passed to the wife as her unrestricted property, and from her to the plaintiff. There was nothing in the nature of a spendthrift trust. There was ample consideration for the note held by the plaintiff.
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

4/9/2019

 Southern District of Ohio

Waco S. Wiggins

3:18-CV-38

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff

✔ Michael J. Newman
### S I0-1 00326-008 

### From:RAPIO CITY AIRPORT 6053946190 03/24/2010 15:22 

### iV'PI ldr.,. 

# or: I 

## RAPHD CITY REGIONAL 

# IRPORT www.tapairport.org March 24. 20 J 0 The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood Secretary U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington. DC 20590 Docket DOT.OST·20 I 

# 0-_ Dear Mr. Secretary: Thank you for the opportunity to express (my/our) support for the application for antitrust immunity and proposedjoint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interamancc competition wiJI jn tum enhance the !>eneflts ofthe Department's Open Skies policy - first by solidifyina U;S ••Japan Open Skies, then by serving 

### as a foundation for further liberalization across Asia. After a thorough review. (Vwo) encourage the Department ofTransportation to approve this application as it would enable these oneworJd alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AAIJAL alliance will have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service. scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having three competitive air alJiances to choose from. I urge you to quickly approve this application.

Cameron 

### D. Humphres Rapid City Regional Airport 4550 Terminal Rd. Suite 

### J02 Rapid City SO 57703 eameron.humhres@rcgov.org



### . 

# _----_._---_.**-------.-~-------** 

### . 4S50 TtRMINAL ROAD. SUITE 102 " RAPID CllY " SOUTH DAKOTA S7703·fl706 • 6QS·394·419!l",!,a - 605· 394·6U'O!,H 

# ---_..

# _ ..

### _

..

# _---._-- ........

# - .....

# - .......**----.-.--.-~-.-,.-.------** ......

# --- ..... , ......

# --..**~-..** ...... 

### ...**~-** 

### ...

# ­

f'E -&cz
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

LaShawn Pettus-Brown,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action 2:18-cv-83
v. Judge George C. Smith
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers
State of Ohio,
Defendant.

RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This case is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation that
the Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. (ECF No. 2).

The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Report and Recommendation and
believes that, in light of Plaintiff's Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 3), the sufficiency of Plaintiff's Complaint will be more
appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge.

Dated: March 14, 2018 J/si George C. Smith
GEORGE C. SMITH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JON

SUSTARICH,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

 v.

MARK OTTOVICH,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-17326

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-01793-JSW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 9, 2012** 

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Mark Ottovich appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting the

government’s petition to enforce a summons against him in connection with an

investigation into income tax liabilities of his mother’s estate. We have

FILED

OCT 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-17326

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error. United States v.

Blackman, 72 F.3d 1418, 1422 (9th Cir. 1995). We affirm.

The district court did not clearly err by granting the petition because

Ottovich failed to rebut the government’s showing that the summons was issued in

good faith. See Stewart v. United States, 511 F.3d 1251, 1254-55 (9th Cir. 2008)

(explaining taxpayer’s “heavy” burden to show an abuse of process or lack of good

faith once government makes prima facie showing that the summons was issued in

good faith); Crystal v. United States, 172 F.3d 1141, 1144 (9th Cir. 1999) ( “The

government’s burden is a slight one, and may be satisfied by a declaration from the

investigating agent[.]” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4505 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4505

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
  To enable State homes to furnish nursing home care to parents any of 
         whose children died while serving in the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF STATE HOME CARE FOR PARENTS OF VETERANS WHO 
DIED WHILE SERVING IN ARMED FORCES.
    In administering section 51.210(d) of title 38, Code of Federal 
Regulations, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall permit a State 
home to provide services to, in addition to non-veterans described in 
such subsection, a non-veteran any of whose children died while serving 
in the Armed Forces.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0471

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CARESSA JILL HARDY, aka

GLENN LEE DIBLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 1, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 4 2021

08/04/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0471
United States District Court 

Southern District of Ohio 

Eastern Division at Columbus, Ohio

United States of America

-vs- Case No. 2:18-mj-97 

Gerald A. Lawson 

COURTROOM MINUTES 

Preliminary Exam 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Kimberly A. Jolson

Date: February 21, 2018 @ 10:00 a.m.

Deputy Clerk Jessica Rector Counsel for Govt: Noah Litton 

Court Reporter Lahana DuFour Counsel for Deft(s): George Chaney 

Interpreter Pretrial/Probation 

Log In 10:01 a.m. Log Out 10:23 a.m. 

Preliminary Hearing held. 

Testimony of government witness SA Teresa Petit, ATF. 

Probable cause is found. Defendant is ordered to answer to the charges against him. 

Defendant remanded to USMS. 

Case: 2:18-mj-00097-KAJ Doc #: 9 Filed: 02/21/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 26
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Globix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter K.
Stevenson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

       (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: December 18, 2003

                                                 /s/ Peter K. Stevenson
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Peter K. Stevenson
                                                 Chief Executive Officer