EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

DOMINO’S PIZZA MASTER ISSUER LLC,
DOMINO’S IP HOLDER LLC, DOMINO’S PIZZA DISTRIBUTION LLC AND DOMINO’S SPV
CANADIAN HOLDING COMPANY INC. 
 SERIES 2015-1
3.484% FIXED RATE SENIOR SECURED NOTES, CLASS A-2-I 

SERIES 2015-1 4.474% FIXED RATE SENIOR SECURED
NOTES, CLASS A-2-II 
 PURCHASE AGREEMENT 

October 14, 2015 
 GUGGENHEIM
SECURITIES, LLC 
 As Representative of the several 

Initial Purchasers named in Schedule I hereto 

c/o Guggenheim Securities, LLC 
 330 Madison Avenue 

New York, New York 10017 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Domino’s Pizza Master Issuer LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Master Issuer”), Domino’s Pizza
Distribution LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Domestic Distributor”), Domino’s IP Holder LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “IP Holder”) and Domino’s SPV Canadian
Holding Company Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SPV Canadian Holdco” and together with the Master Issuer, the Domestic Distributor and the IP Holder, the “Co-Issuers”), propose, upon the terms and
conditions stated herein, to issue and sell to the several initial purchasers named in Schedule I hereto (the “Initial Purchasers”), two series of fixed rate senior secured notes, (i) the Series 2015-1 3.484% Fixed Rate
Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-I Notes (the “Series 2015-1 Class A-2-I Notes”) in an aggregate principal amount of $500,000,000 and (ii) the Series 2015-1 4.474% Fixed
Rate Senior Secured Class A-2-II Notes (the “Series 2015-1 Class A-2-II Notes” and, together with the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-I Notes, the “Offered
Notes”) in an aggregate principal amount of $800,000,000. 
 The Offered Notes (i) will have terms and
provisions that are summarized in the Pricing Disclosure Package (as defined below) and (ii) are to be issued pursuant to the Amended and Restated Base Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2012 (the “Initial Closing
Date”), (as amended and supplemented as of the date hereof, the “Base Indenture”), and the Series 2015-1 Supplement thereto (the “Series 2015-1 Supplement” and, together with the Base
Indenture and the Series 2012-1 Supplement thereto, dated as of March 15, 2012, the “Indenture”), to be dated as of the Closing Date, in each case entered into by and among the Co-Issuers and Citibank, N.A., as trustee
(in such capacity, the “Trustee”) and as securities intermediary. The Co-Issuers’ obligations under the Offered Notes will be jointly and severally irrevocably and unconditionally guaranteed (the
“Guarantees”) by Domino’s SPV Guarantor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “SPV Guarantor”), Domino’s Pizza Franchising LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
“Domestic Franchisor”), Domino’s Pizza International Franchising Inc., a  







 
Delaware corporation (the “International Franchisor”), Domino’s Pizza Canadian Distribution ULC, a Nova Scotia unlimited company (the “Canadian
Distributor”), Domino’s EQ LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Domestic Distribution Equipment Holder”) and Domino’s RE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Domestic
Distribution Real Estate Holder” and, together with the SPV Guarantor, the Domestic Franchisor, the International Franchisor, the Canadian Distributor and the Domestic Distribution Equipment Holder, the
“Guarantors” and each a “Guarantor” and, together with the Co-Issuers, the “Securitization Entities” and each, a “Securitization Entity”), pursuant to an
Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated March 15, 2012, by and among each Guarantor and the Trustee (the “Guarantee and Collateral Agreement”). This Agreement confirms the agreement of each the
Domino’s Parties (as defined below) with regard to the purchase of the Offered Notes from the Co-Issuers by the Initial Purchasers. Guggenheim Securities, LLC is acting as the representative (the “Representative”) for
the Initial Purchasers in its capacity as an Initial Purchaser. 
 For purposes of this Agreement, “Domino’s”
shall mean Domino’s Pizza, Inc. a Delaware corporation, “Intermediate Holdco” shall mean Domino’s Inc., a Delaware corporation, “Parent Companies” shall mean, collectively, Domino’s and
Intermediate Holdco, and “Domino’s Parties” shall mean, collectively, the Parent Companies, Domino’s Pizza LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, as manager (the “Manager”), and the
Securitization Entities. 
 For purposes of this Agreement, capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to
such terms in the “Certain Definitions” section of the Pricing Disclosure Package (as defined below). 
 1. Purchase and
Resale of the Offered Notes. The Offered Notes will be offered and sold by the Co-Issuers to the Initial Purchasers without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), in
reliance on an exemption pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) under the 1933 Act. The Domino’s Parties have prepared (i) a preliminary offering memorandum, dated September 28, 2015 (as amended or supplemented as of the Applicable Time (as
defined below), the “Preliminary Offering Memorandum”) setting forth information regarding the Domino’s Parties and the Offered Notes, (ii) the investor presentations attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (the
“Investor Presentations”), (iii) a pricing term sheet substantially in the form attached hereto as Schedule II (the “Pricing Term Sheet”) setting forth the terms of the
Offered Notes and certain other information omitted from the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and (iv) a final offering memorandum to be dated prior to the Closing Date (as amended or supplemented, together with the Investor Presentations and
the documents listed on Schedule III hereto, the “Final Offering Memorandum”), setting forth information regarding the Domino’s Parties and the Offered Notes. The Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the
Pricing Term Sheet, the Investor Presentations and the documents listed on Schedule III hereto are collectively referred to as the “Pricing Disclosure Package”. The Domino’s Parties hereby confirm that they
have authorized the use of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum in connection with the offering and resale of the Offered Notes by the Initial Purchasers. “Applicable Time” means
12:48 p.m. (New York City time) on the date of this Agreement. 

  
 2 








 All references in this Agreement to the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure
Package or the Final Offering Memorandum include, unless expressly stated otherwise, all documents, financial statements and schedules and other information contained, incorporated by reference or deemed incorporated by reference therein (and
references in this Agreement to such information being “contained,” “included” or “stated” (and other references of like import) in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final
Offering Memorandum shall be deemed to mean all such information contained, incorporated by reference or deemed incorporated by reference therein, to the extent such information has not been superseded or modified by other information contained,
incorporated by reference or deemed incorporated by reference therein). All documents filed (but not furnished to the Initial Purchasers, unless such furnished document is expressly incorporated by reference in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum,
the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum, as the case may be) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“1934 Act”) and so deemed to be included in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum, as the case may be, or any amendment or supplement thereto are hereinafter referred
to herein as the “Exchange Act Reports”. 
 It is understood and acknowledged that upon original issuance thereof
the Offered Notes (and all securities issued in exchange therefor or in substitution thereof) will bear the legends that are set forth under the caption “Transfer Restrictions” in the Pricing Disclosure Package. 

You have advised the Co-Issuers that the Initial Purchasers intend to offer and resell (the “Exempt
Resales”) the Offered Notes purchased by the Initial Purchasers hereunder on the terms set forth in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, as amended or supplemented, solely (a) to persons whom
the Initial Purchasers reasonably believe to be “qualified institutional buyers” (“QIBs”) as defined in Rule 144A under the 1933 Act (“Rule 144A”) and (b) outside of the United States,
to persons who are not U.S. Persons (such persons, “Non-U.S. Persons”) as defined in Regulation S under the 1933 Act (“Regulation S”) in offshore transactions in reliance on Regulation S, in each
case, whom the Initial Purchasers reasonably believe are not Competitors. As used in the preceding sentence, the terms “offshore transaction” and “United States” have the meanings assigned to them in
Regulation S. Those persons specified in clauses (a) and (b) above are referred to herein as “Eligible Purchasers”. 

2. Representations and Warranties of the Domino’s Parties. Each of the Domino’s Parties jointly and severally,
represents and warrants, on and as of the date hereof and on and as of the Closing Date, as follows: 
 (a) When the Offered Notes
are issued and delivered pursuant to this Agreement, such Offered Notes and the Guarantees will not be of the same class (within the meaning of Rule 144A) as securities that are listed on a national securities exchange registered under
Section 6 of the 1934 Act or that are quoted in a United States automated inter-dealer quotation system. 
 (b) Assuming the accuracy
of your representations and warranties in Section 3(b) of this Agreement, the purchase and resale of the Offered Notes pursuant to this Agreement (including pursuant to the Exempt Resales) are exempt from the registration requirements of the
1933 Act. 

  
 3 








 (c) No form of general solicitation or general advertising within the meaning of
Regulation D under the 1933 Act (including, but not limited to, advertisements, articles, notices or other communications published in any newspaper, magazine or similar medium or broadcast over television or radio, or any seminar or meeting whose
attendees have been invited by any general solicitation or general advertising) (each, a “General Solicitation”) was used by the Domino’s Parties, any of their respective affiliates or any of their respective
representatives (other than the Initial Purchasers and their affiliates or any of their respective representatives, as to whom the Domino’s Parties make no representation) in connection with the offer and sale of the Offered Notes.

 (d) No directed selling efforts within the meaning of Rule 902 under the 1933 Act were used by the Domino’s
Parties or any of their respective affiliates or any of their respective representatives (other than the Initial Purchasers and their respective affiliates or any of their respective representatives, as to whom the Domino’s Parties make no
representation) with respect to Offered Notes sold outside the United States to Non-U.S. Persons, and each of the Domino’s Parties, their respective affiliates and their respective representatives (other than the Initial Purchasers and their
respective affiliates and representatives, as to whom the Domino’s Parties make no representation) has complied with and will implement the “offering restrictions” required by Rule 902 under the 1933 Act.

 (e) Each of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, each as of its
respective date, contains all the information specified in, and meeting the requirements of, Rule 144A(d)(4) under the 1933 Act. 
 (f) None
of the Domino’s Parties nor any other person acting on behalf of any Domino’s Party has offered or sold any securities in a manner that would be integrated with the offering of the Offered Notes contemplated by this Agreement pursuant to
the 1933 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or the interpretations thereof by the Commission. 
 (g) The Preliminary Offering
Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum have been prepared by the Domino’s Parties for use by the Initial Purchasers in connection with the Exempt Resales. No order or decree preventing the use of the
Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum, or any order asserting that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are subject to the registration requirements of the 1933 Act, has been
issued, and no proceeding for that purpose has commenced or is pending or, to the knowledge of any Domino’s Party, is contemplated. 

(h) The Pricing Disclosure Package did not, as of the Applicable Time, and will not, as of the Closing Date, contain an untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided that no representation or warranty is made as to
information contained in the Pricing Disclosure Package in reliance upon and in conformity with the Initial Purchaser Information (as defined in Section 8(e) below). 

  
 4 








 (i) The Final Offering Memorandum will not, as of its date and as of the Closing Date,
contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided that no representation
or warranty is made as to information contained in the Final Offering Memorandum in reliance upon and in conformity with the Initial Purchaser Information. 

(j) None of the Domino’s Parties has prepared, made, used, authorized, approved or distributed and will not, and will not cause or allow
its agents or representatives to, prepare, make, use, authorize, approve or distribute any written communication (as defined in Rule 405 under the 1933 Act) that constitutes an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the Offered Notes, or
otherwise is prepared to market the Offered Notes, other than the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, without the prior consent of the Representative. 

(k) The Exchange Act Reports, when they were or are filed with the Commission, conformed or will conform in all material respects to the
applicable requirements of the 1934 Act and the applicable rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder. The Exchange Act Reports did not, when filed with the Commission, contain an untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 

(l) Each of the Domino’s Parties and each of its subsidiaries has been duly organized, is validly existing and in good
standing as a corporation, limited liability company or unlimited company, as applicable, under the laws of its respective jurisdiction of organization and is duly qualified to do business and in good standing as a foreign corporation, limited
liability company or unlimited company, as applicable, in each jurisdiction in which its ownership or lease of property or the conduct of its businesses requires such qualification, except where the failure to be so qualified or in good standing
would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have (i) a material adverse effect on the condition (financial or otherwise), results of operations, stockholders’ equity, properties, management, business or prospects
of the Securitization Entities or the Domino’s Parties taken as a whole or (ii) a material adverse effect on the performance by the Domino’s Parties of this Agreement, the Offered Notes, the Indenture or any of the other Related
Documents or the consummation of any of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby (collectively, clauses (i) and (ii), a “Material Adverse Effect”). Each of the Domino’s Parties has all corporate, limited
liability company or unlimited company power and authority necessary to own or lease its properties and to conduct the businesses in which it is now engaged or contemplated in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum.
Domino’s does not own or control, directly or indirectly, any corporation, limited liability company or other entity other than the subsidiaries listed in Exhibit 21 to Domino’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2014. 
 (m) (i) Domino’s has the debt capitalization as set forth in each of the Pricing Disclosure
Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, and all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Domino’s have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable. 

  
 5 








 (ii) The Co-Issuers have an authorized capitalization as set forth in each of the Pricing
Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, and all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of the Co-Issuers have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable. 

(iii) All of the outstanding shares of capital stock, membership interests or other equity interests of each of the Securitization Entities
are owned, directly or indirectly, by Domino’s, free and clear of all liens, security interests, mortgages, pledges, charges, equities, claims or restrictions on transferability or encumbrances of any kind (collectively,
“Liens”), other than those Liens (i) imposed by the Indenture and the Related Documents, (ii) which constitute Permitted Liens, (iii) that would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect or
(iv) which result from transfer restrictions imposed by the Securities Act or the securities or blue sky laws of certain jurisdictions. 

(n) Each of the Co-Issuers shall have all requisite corporate or limited liability company power and authority, as applicable,
to execute, deliver and perform its respective obligations under the Indenture on the Closing Date. The Base Indenture has been duly and validly authorized, executed and delivered by the Co-Issuers and constitutes the valid and legally binding
obligation of the Co-Issuers, enforceable against the Co-Issuers in accordance with its terms, except that such enforceability may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance or transfer, moratorium or similar laws
affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject to general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). The Series 2015-1 Supplement shall be duly and validly authorized
by the Co-Issuers on or prior to the Closing Date and upon its execution and delivery and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the Trustee, will constitute the valid and legally binding obligation of the Co-Issuers, enforceable
against the Co-Issuers in accordance with its terms, except that such enforceability may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance or transfer, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally
and subject to general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). Assuming the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the Initial Purchasers contained in
Section 3(b) of this Agreement, no qualification of the Indenture under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (the “Trust Indenture Act”) is required in connection with the offer and sale of the Offered Notes contemplated
hereby or in connection with the Exempt Resales. The Base Indenture conforms in all material respects to the description thereof in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum. When executed by the Co-Issuers, the Series
2015-1 Supplement will conform in all material respects to the description thereof in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum.  

(o) Each of the Co-Issuers shall have all requisite corporate or limited liability company power and authority, as applicable, to execute,
issue, sell and perform its obligations under the Offered Notes on or prior to the Closing Date. The Offered Notes shall be duly authorized by each of the Co-Issuers on or prior to the Closing Date and, when duly executed by each of the Co-Issuers
in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, assuming due authentication of the Offered Notes by the Trustee, upon delivery to the Initial Purchasers against payment therefor in accordance with the terms hereof, will be validly issued and
delivered and 

  
 6 








 
will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of each of the Co-Issuers entitled to the benefits of the Indenture, enforceable against each of the Co-Issuers in accordance with their
terms, except that the enforceability may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance or transfer, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject to general principles of equity
(regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). When executed by each of the Co-Issuers, the Offered Notes will conform in all material respects to the description thereof in each of the Pricing
Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum. 
 (p) Each Guarantor had all requisite limited liability company or unlimited company
power and authority, as applicable, to execute, issue and perform its obligations under the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement on the Initial Closing Date. The Guarantee and Collateral Agreement has been duly and validly authorized, executed and
delivered by each of the Guarantors, and the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement constitutes valid and legally binding obligations of the Guarantors, enforceable against the Guarantors in accordance with their terms, except that the enforceability
may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance or transfer, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject to general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability
is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). The Guarantors, the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement conforms in all material respects to the description thereof in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum. The
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement is effective to guarantee the obligations of the Co-Issuers under the Offered Notes. 
 (q) Each of the
Domino’s Parties, as applicable, had and shall have all required corporate, limited liability company or unlimited company power and authority, as applicable, to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under each Related Document to which
it is a party on the Initial Closing Date or on or prior to the Closing Date, as applicable (other than the Offered Notes, the Indenture and the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement to the extent covered in Section 2(n), (o) and (p)). Each
Guarantor had and shall have all required limited liability company or unlimited company power and authority, to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under each Related Document to which it is a party on the Initial Closing Date or on or
prior to the Closing Date (other than the Offered Notes, the Indenture and the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement to the extent covered in Section 2(n), (o) and (p)). Each of the Related Documents has been or shall be duly and validly
authorized, executed and delivered by each of the Domino’s Parties (to the extent a party thereto) constitutes the valid and legally binding obligation of each of the Domino’s Parties (to the extent a party thereto) enforceable against
each of the Domino’s Parties (to the extent a party thereto) in accordance with its terms, except that the enforceability may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance or transfer, moratorium or similar laws
affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject to general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law) and, as to rights of indemnification and contribution with respect to
liabilities under securities laws, by principles of public policy. Each such Related Document conforms in all material respects to the description thereof (if any) in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum. 

  
 7 








 (r) Each of the Domino’s Parties party hereto has all requisite corporate, limited liability
company or unlimited company power and authority, as applicable, to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Agreement. This Agreement has been duly and validly authorized, executed and delivered by each of the Domino’s Parties
party hereto. 
 (s) (i) The issue and sale of the Offered Notes and the Guarantees, (ii) the execution, delivery and performance by
the Domino’s Parties of the Offered Notes, the Guarantees, the Indenture, this Agreement and the other Related Documents (to the extent a party thereto), (iii) the application of the proceeds from the sale of the Offered Notes as described
under “Use of Proceeds” in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum and (iv) the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, do not and will not (A) conflict with or result in
a breach or violation of any of the terms or provisions of, impose any lien, charge or encumbrance upon any property or assets of any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries, or constitute a default under, any indenture,
mortgage, deed of trust, loan agreement, credit agreement, security agreement, license, lease or other agreement or instrument to which any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries is a party or by which any of the
Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries is bound or to which any of the property or assets of any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries is subject, except for Liens created by the Indenture or the
other Related Documents and Permitted Liens, (B) result in any violation of the provisions of the charter, by-laws, certificate of formation or limited liability company agreement (or similar organizational documents) of any of the
Domino’s Parties, or (C) result in any violation of any statute or any judgment, order, decree, rule or regulation of any court or governmental agency or body having jurisdiction over any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their
respective subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets, except (in the case of clauses (A) and (C)) as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 

(t) No consent, approval, authorization or order of, or filing, registration or qualification with any court or governmental agency or
regulatory body having jurisdiction over any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets is required for the issue and sale of the Offered Notes and the Guarantees, the
execution, delivery and performance by any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries of the Offered Notes, the Guarantees, the Indenture, this Agreement and the other Related Documents (to the extent they are parties
thereto), the application of the proceeds from the sale of the Offered Notes as described under “Use of Proceeds” in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby, except for (A) such consents, approvals, authorizations, orders, filings, registrations or qualifications as shall have been obtained or made prior to the Closing Date or are permitted to be obtained or made
subsequent to the Closing Date pursuant to the Indenture and (B) such consents, approvals, authorizations, orders, filings, registrations or qualifications as may be required under state securities or Blue Sky laws in connection with the
purchase and distribution and resale (including pursuant to the Exempt Resales) of the Offered Notes by the Initial Purchasers. 

  
 8 








 (u) The historical consolidated financial statements of Domino’s (including the related
notes and supporting schedules) included or incorporated by reference in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum present fairly in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
entities referred to therein, at the dates and for the periods indicated, and have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) applied on a consistent basis
throughout the periods involved. The interactive data in eXtensible Business Reporting Language included or incorporated by reference in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum fairly present in all material respects the
information called for by, and have been prepared in accordance with, the Commission’s rules and guidelines applicable thereto. 
 (v)
The historical consolidated financial statements of the Master Issuer (including the related notes and supporting schedules) included in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum present fairly in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the entities referred to therein, at the dates and for the periods indicated, and have been prepared in conformity with GAAP applied on a consistent basis throughout the periods involved.

 (w) The Securitized Net Cash Flow included in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum is derived from the
quarterly noteholder statements generated by the Master Issuer and represents the arithmetic sum of each of the relevant amounts reflected in such quarterly noteholder statements. The Securitized Net Cash Flow set forth in the Pricing Disclosure
Package and the Final Offering Memorandum has been prepared on a basis consistent with the quarterly noteholder statements and gives effect to assumptions made on a reasonable basis and in good faith and present fairly in all material respects the
historical Securitized Net Cash Flow. 
 (x) The non-GAAP financial measures that are included in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the
Final Offering Memorandum have been calculated based on amounts derived from the financial statements and books and records of the Domino’s Parties, and the Domino’s Parties believe that any adjustments to such non-GAAP financial measures
have a reasonable basis and have been made in good faith. 
 (y) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, who have certified certain financial statements
of Domino’s, whose report appears in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum or is incorporated by reference therein and who have delivered the initial letter referred to in Section 7(n) hereof, (x) are
independent registered public accountants with respect to Domino’s and its subsidiaries within the meaning of the 1933 Act and the applicable rules and regulations adopted by the Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and
(y) was, as of the date of such report, and is, as of the date hereof, an independent public accounting firm with respect to the Domino’s Parties. 

(z) Domino’s and each of its subsidiaries maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the 1934 Act) that complies with the requirements of the 1934 Act and that has been designed by, or under the supervision of, Domino’s principal executive and principal financial officers, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of 

  
 9 








 
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Domino’s and each of its subsidiaries maintain internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, including, but not limited to, internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that
(i) records are maintained that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Domino’s and each of its subsidiaries, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of Domino’s and each of its subsidiaries are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of Domino’s and each
of its subsidiaries and (iii) the unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the assets of Domino’s and each of its subsidiaries that could have a material effect on the financial statements are prevented or timely detected. As of the
date of the most recent consolidated balance sheet of Domino’s reviewed or audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the audit committee of the board of directors of Domino’s, there were no material weaknesses in any of Domino’s and
its subsidiaries’ internal controls over financial reporting. 
 (aa) Since December 28, 2014, the date of the most
recent balance sheet of Domino’s and its consolidated subsidiaries audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the audit committee of the board of directors of Domino’s (“Audit Date”), (i) Domino’s has not
been advised of or become aware of (A) any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, that could adversely affect the ability of Domino’s or any of its subsidiaries to record, process,
summarize and report financial data, or any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, and (B) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the internal
control over financial reporting of any of Domino’s and each of its subsidiaries or that is otherwise material to Domino’s and each of its subsidiaries; and (ii) there have been no significant changes in internal control over
financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect internal control over financial reporting, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

(bb) The section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates” incorporated by reference in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum contained in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum accurately and fully describes (i) the accounting policies
that Domino’s believes are the most important in the portrayal of the financial condition and results of operations of Domino’s and each of its subsidiaries and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex
judgments; (ii) the judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of critical accounting policies; and (iii) the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different
assumptions and an explanation thereof. 
 (cc) Except as described in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering
Memorandum, since the Audit Date, none of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective subsidiaries has (i) sustained any loss or interference with its business from fire, explosion, flood or other calamity, whether or not covered by
insurance, or from any labor 

  
 10 








 
disturbance or dispute or court or governmental action, order or decree, (ii) issued or granted any securities, (iii) incurred any liability or obligation, direct or contingent, other
than liabilities and obligations that were incurred in the ordinary course of business, (iv) entered into any transaction not in the ordinary course of business and/or (v) declared or paid any dividend on its capital stock, and since the
Audit Date, there has not been any change in the capital stock or limited liability company interests, as applicable, or long-term debt of any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries or any adverse change, or any
development involving an adverse change, in or affecting the condition (financial or otherwise), results of operations, stockholders’ equity or limited liability company interests, as applicable, properties, management, business or prospects of
any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries, in each of (i) through (v) above, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 

(dd) Each of the Co-Issuers and the Guarantors owns and has good title to its Collateral, free and clear of all Liens other than Permitted
Liens. Each of the Parent Companies, the Manager and each of their respective subsidiaries (other than the Co-Issuers and the Guarantors) has good and marketable title in fee simple to all real property and good and marketable title to all personal
property owned by it, in each case free and clear of all Liens, except for Permitted Liens and such Liens that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. All assets held under lease by the
Domino’s Parties are held by the relevant entity under valid, subsisting and enforceable leases, with such exceptions as do not materially interfere with the use made of such assets by the relevant entity. 

(ee) Each of the Co-Issuers’ and the Guarantors’ rights and interests in the Collateral Documents (except with respect to any
Franchisee Promissory Notes or any owned real property) constitutes accounts or general intangibles under the applicable UCC. The Base Indenture and the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement are effective to create a valid and continuing Lien on the
Collateral in favor of the Trustee on behalf of and for the benefit of the Secured Parties, which Lien on the Collateral has been perfected (subject to Liens on the Collateral to be perfected between the date hereof and the Closing Date with respect
to Intellectual Property registered or applied for in jurisdictions outside of the U.S., Canada and the United Kingdom and any exceptions described in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum and that are otherwise set forth
in the Base Indenture, the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement or any other Related Document) and is prior to all other Liens (other than Permitted Liens). Except as described in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, the
Co-Issuers and the Guarantors have received all consents and approvals required by the terms of the Collateral in order to pledge the Collateral to the Trustee under the Indenture and under the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement. All action
necessary to perfect such first priority security interest in the Collateral (subject to Liens on the Collateral to be perfected between the date hereof and the Closing Date with respect to Intellectual Property registered or applied for in
jurisdictions outside of the U.S., Canada and the United Kingdom and any exceptions described in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum and that are otherwise set forth in the Base Indenture, the Guarantee and Collateral
Agreement or any other Related Document) has been duly taken. 

  
 11 








 (ff) Other than the security interest granted to the Trustee under the Base Indenture, the
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement or any other Related Documents or any other Permitted Lien, none of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective subsidiaries have pledged, assigned, sold or granted as of the Closing Date a security
interest in the Collateral. 
 (gg) All action necessary (including, without limitation, the filing of UCC-1 financing statements) to
protect and evidence the Trustee’s security interest in the Collateral in the United States and each Included Country has been duly and effectively taken (as described in, and subject to the actions to be taken between the date hereof and the
Closing Date and such other exceptions described in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum and that are otherwise set forth in the Base Indenture, the Series 2015-1 Supplement, the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement or any
other Related Document). No effective security agreement, financing statement, equivalent security or lien instrument or continuation statement authorized by any Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries and listing such Person
as debtor covering all or any part of the Collateral is on file or of record in any jurisdiction (except (i) in respect of Permitted Liens or (ii) such as may have been filed, recorded or made by such Person in favor of the Trustee on
behalf of the Secured Parties in connection with the Base Indenture and the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement), and no such Person has authorized any such filing. 

(hh) Each Domino’s Party and their respective subsidiaries has such permits, licenses, franchises, certificates of need and
other approvals or authorizations of governmental or regulatory authorities (“Permits”) as are necessary under applicable law to own their properties and conduct their businesses in the manner described in the Pricing
Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, except for any of the foregoing that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Each Domino’s Party and each of their respective
subsidiaries has fulfilled and performed all of its obligations with respect to the Permits, and no event has occurred that allows, or after notice or lapse of time would allow, revocation or termination thereof or results in any other impairment of
the rights of the holder or any such Permits, except for any of the foregoing that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. None of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective
subsidiaries has received notice of any revocation or modification of any such Permits or has any reason to believe that any such Permits will not be renewed in the ordinary course, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, be
reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 
 (ii) Each of the Domino’s Parties and each of
their respective subsidiaries owns or possesses adequate rights to use all patents, patent applications, trademarks, service marks, trade names, trademark registrations, service mark registrations, copyrights know-how and intellectual property
rights in software, systems and technology (including trade secrets and other unpatented and/or unpatentable proprietary or confidential information, systems or procedures) (collectively, the “Intellectual Property”)
necessary for the conduct of their respective businesses as currently conducted, except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; provided, however, for the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing shall not be deemed to
constitute a representation or warranty with respect to infringement or other violation of Intellectual Property or other proprietary rights of third parties, which are  

  
 12 








 
exclusively addressed below in the fourth sentence of this Section 2(ii). The Domino’s Parties and each of their respective subsidiaries owns free and clear of all Liens (other
than Franchise Arrangements, Permitted Liens and non-exclusive licenses granted in the ordinary course of business of the Domino’s Parties) all Intellectual Property described in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Final Offering
Memorandum and the Pricing Disclosure Package as being owned by it (“Company Intellectual Property”). There are no third parties who own any Company Intellectual Property, except as (1) described in the Preliminary
Offering Memorandum, the Final Offering Memorandum and the Pricing Disclosure Package, or (2) would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. To the Domino’s Parties’ knowledge, there is no infringement by third
parties of any Company Intellectual Property, except as (1) described in the Pricing Disclosure Package, the Preliminary Offering Memorandum or the Final Offering Memorandum or (2) would not be reasonably expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect. Except as (1) described in the Pricing Disclosure Package, the Preliminary Offering Memorandum or the Final Offering Memorandum or (2) would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, there is no pending
or, to the Domino’s Parties’ knowledge, threatened action, suit, proceeding or claim by others: (A) challenging the Domino’s Parties’ rights in or to any Company Intellectual Property; (B) challenging the validity,
enforceability or scope of any Company Intellectual Property; or (C) asserting that the Domino’s Parties or any of their subsidiaries infringes or otherwise violates, or would, upon the commercialization of any product or service of the
Domino’s Parties or any of their subsidiaries described in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Final Offering Memorandum or the Pricing Disclosure Package as under development, infringe or otherwise violate, any Intellectual Property of
others.  
 (jj) There are no legal or governmental proceedings pending to which any Domino’s Party or any of their
respective subsidiaries is a party or of which any property or assets of any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries is the subject that would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect. To each Domino’s Party’s knowledge, no such proceedings are threatened or contemplated by governmental authorities or others. 

(kk) The statements made in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum under the captions “Description of
the Offered Notes” and “Description of the Base Indenture and the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement,” insofar as they constitute a summary of the terms of the Offered Notes and the Indenture, and under captions “Description of
the Securitization Entities and the Securitization Entities’ Charter Documents,” “Domino’s Pizza,” “Description of the Franchise Arrangements,” “Description of the Manager and Management Agreement,”
“Description of the Servicer and the Servicing Agreement,” “Description of the Back-Up Manager and the Back-Up Management Agreement,” “Description of the Distribution and Contribution Agreements,” “Description of
the IP License Agreements,” “Description of the Product Purchase Agreements,” “Description of the Real Estate Assets,” “Certain Legal Aspects of the Franchise Arrangements,” “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences,” “Certain ERISA and Related Considerations” and “Transfer Restrictions,” insofar as they purport to constitute summaries of the terms of statutes, rules or regulations, legal or governmental proceedings or
contracts and other documents, constitute accurate summaries of the terms of such statutes, rules and regulations, legal and governmental proceedings and contracts and other documents in all material respects; provided, that no representation
or warranty is made as to the Initial Purchaser Information (as defined in Section 8(e)). 

  
 13 








 (ll) Except as would not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect,
(A) each of the Domino’s Parties and each of their respective subsidiaries carry, or are covered by, insurance from insurers of recognized financial responsibility in such amounts and covering such risks as is adequate for the conduct of
their respective businesses and the value of their respective properties and as is customary for companies engaged in similar businesses in similar industries; (B) all such policies of insurance of the Domino’s Parties and each of their
respective subsidiaries are in full force and effect; (C) the Domino’s Parties and each of their respective subsidiaries are in compliance with the terms of such policies in all material respects; (D) none of the Domino’s Parties
nor any of their respective subsidiaries has received notice from any insurer or agent of such insurer that capital improvements or other expenditures are required or necessary to be made in order to continue such insurance; and (E) there are
no claims by the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries under any such policy or instrument as to which any insurance company is denying liability or defending under a reservation of rights clause. None of the Domino’s
Parties nor any of their respective subsidiaries has any reason to believe that it will not be able to renew its existing insurance coverage as and when such coverage expires or to obtain similar coverage from similar insurers as may be necessary to
continue its business at a cost that could not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 

(mm) No relationship, direct or indirect, that would be required to be described in a registration statement of Domino’s pursuant to
Item 404 of Regulation S-K, exists between or among any of the Domino’s Parties and their respective subsidiaries, on the one hand, and the directors, officers, stockholders, customers or suppliers of any of the Domino’s Parties and
their respective subsidiaries, on the other hand, that has not been described in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum. 

(nn) No labor disturbance by or dispute with the employees of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries exists or, to
the knowledge of any Domino’s Party, is imminent, in each case that would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 

(oo) None of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective subsidiaries has taken any action which would (A) conflict with or
result in a breach or violation of any of the terms or provisions of, impose any lien, charge or encumbrance upon any property or assets of any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries, or constitute a default under, any
indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, loan agreement, credit agreement, security agreement, license, lease or other agreement or instrument to which any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries is a party or by which any of
the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries is bound or to which any of the property or assets of any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries is subject, except for Liens created by the Indenture or
the other Related Documents and Permitted Liens, (B) result in any violation of the provisions of the charter, by-laws, certificate of formation or limited liability company agreement (or similar organizational documents) of any of the
Domino’s Parties, or (C) result in any violation of any statute or any judgment, order, decree, rule or regulation of any court or governmental 

  
 14 








 
agency or body having jurisdiction over any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets, except (in the case of clauses
(A) and (C)) as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 
 (pp) Except
as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect: 

(i) the Domino’s Parties: (a) are in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws, (b) hold
all permits, licenses, approvals, registrations, notifications, exemptions and other authorizations required under any Environmental Law (collectively, “Environmental Permits”, each of which is in full force and effect)
required for any of their current operations or for any property owned, leased, or otherwise operated by any of them and (c) are in material compliance with all of their Environmental Permits; 

(ii) Any gasoline or petroleum (including crude oil or any fraction thereof) or petroleum products (virgin or
unused), polychlorinated biphenyls, urea-formaldehyde insulation, asbestos, pollutants, contaminants, radioactivity and any other materials or substances that are regulated pursuant to any applicable Environmental Law (collectively,
“Materials of Environmental Concern”) are not present at, on, under or in any real property now or formerly owned, leased or operated by any Domino’s Party or any of their respective subsidiaries, or at any other
location (including, without limitation, any location to which Materials of Environmental Concern have been sent for re-use or recycling or for treatment, storage or disposal) which would reasonably be expected to (i) give rise to liability of
any Domino’s Party or any of their respective subsidiaries under any applicable Environmental Law, (ii) interfere with any Domino’s Party’s or any of their respective subsidiaries’ continued operations or (iii) impair
the fair saleable value of any real property owned by any Domino’s Party or any of their respective subsidiaries; 

(iii) there is no judicial, administrative, or arbitral proceeding (including any notice of violation or alleged violation)
under or relating to any Environmental Law to which any Domino’s Party or any of their respective subsidiaries is, or to the knowledge of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries will be, named as a party that is
pending or, to the knowledge of any Domino’s Party or any of their respective subsidiaries, threatened; 
 (iv) none of
the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries has received any written request for information, or been notified in writing that it is a potentially responsible party under or relating to the Federal Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act or any similar Environmental Law, or with respect to any Materials of Environmental Concern; 

(v) none of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries has entered into or agreed to any consent decree,
order, or settlement or other agreement, or is subject to any judgment, decree, or order or other agreement, in any judicial, administrative, arbitral, or other forum for dispute resolution, in each case, that would be expected to result in ongoing
obligations or costs relating to compliance with or liability under any Environmental Law; and 
 (vi) none of the
Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries has assumed or retained, by contract or conduct, any liabilities of any kind, fixed or contingent, known or unknown, under any Environmental Law or with respect to any Materials of
Environmental Concern. 

  
 15 








 (qq) Each of the Domino’s Parties and each of their respective subsidiaries has filed all
federal, state, local and foreign tax returns required to be filed through the date hereof, subject to permitted extensions (except in any case in which the failure so to file would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect), and have paid or caused to be paid all taxes due pursuant to said returns, (i) except for such taxes as are being contested in good faith and by appropriate proceedings, (ii) except for which adequate reserves have been set aside
in accordance with GAAP or (iii) as would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect. No tax deficiency has been determined adversely to the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries, nor does any
Domino’s Party have any knowledge of any tax deficiencies that have been, or could reasonably be expected to be asserted against the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries, that would, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 
 (rr) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect, (i) each “employee benefit plan” (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) and whether or not subject to ERISA) for which any of the
Domino’s Parties would have any material liability, contingent or otherwise (each a “Plan”), presently complies and has been maintained in compliance with its terms and with the requirements of all applicable statutes,
rules and regulations including ERISA and the Code; (ii) no prohibited transaction, within the meaning of Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, has occurred with respect to any Plan excluding transactions effected pursuant
to a statutory or administrative exemption; and (iii) each Plan that is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code is so qualified and nothing has occurred, whether by action or by failure to act, which would cause the loss
of such qualification. No Plan is or was subject to Title IV of ERISA and none of the Domino’s Parties has any material liability with regards to any post-retirement welfare benefit under a Plan other than as required by Part 6 of Subtitle B of
Title I of ERISA or similar required continuation of coverage law. 
 (ss) No Guarantor is currently prohibited, directly or indirectly,
from paying any dividends to its parent or to the Co-Issuers, from making any other distribution on such Guarantor’s capital stock, limited liability company, unlimited company or other ownership interests, as applicable, from repaying to its
parent or the Co-Issuers any loans or advances to such Guarantor from its parent or the Co-Issuers or from transferring any of such Guarantor’s property or assets to its parent or the Co-Issuers, or any other subsidiary of its parent or the
Co-Issuers. 
 (tt) None of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective subsidiaries is, and after giving effect to the offer and
sale of the Offered Notes and the application of the proceeds therefrom as described under “Use of Proceeds” in each of the Pricing Disclosure 

  
 16 








 
Package and the Final Offering Memorandum will be, an “investment company” or a company “controlled” by an “investment company” within the meaning of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder. None of the Co-Issuers constitutes a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule
promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. 
 (uu) The statistical and market-related
data included or incorporated by reference in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum and the consolidated financial statements of Domino’s, the Master Issuer and their respective subsidiaries included in the Pricing
Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum are based on or derived from sources that the Domino’s Parties believe to be reliable in all material respects. 

(vv) Immediately after giving effect to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, each of the
Domino’s Parties will be Solvent. As used in this Agreement, the term “Solvent” means, with respect to a particular date, that on such date (i) the present fair market value (or present fair saleable value) of the
assets of such relevant entity are not less than the total amount required to pay the liabilities of such relevant entity on its total existing debts and liabilities (including contingent liabilities) as they become absolute and matured,
(ii) the relevant entity is able to realize upon its assets and pay its debts and other liabilities, contingent obligations and commitments as they mature and become due in the normal course of business, (iii) assuming the completion of
the transactions contemplated by the Related Documents, the relevant entity is not incurring debts or liabilities beyond its ability to pay as such debts and liabilities mature, (iv) the relevant entity is not engaged in any business or
transaction, and is not about to engage in any business or transaction, for which its property would constitute unreasonably small capital after giving due consideration to the prevailing practice in the industry in which such entity is engaged, and
(v) the relevant entity is not a defendant in any civil action that would result in a judgment that such entity is or would become unable to satisfy. In computing the amount of such contingent liabilities at any time, it is intended that such
liabilities will be computed at the amount that, in the light of all the facts and circumstances existing at such time, represents the amount that can reasonably be expected to become an actual or matured liability. 

(ww) There are no contracts, agreements or understandings between or among any Domino’s Party and any person granting such person the
right to require any of the Domino’s Parties to file a registration statement under the 1933 Act with respect to any securities of the Domino’s Parties owned or to be owned by such person or to include any such securities with any
securities being registered pursuant to any other registration statement filed by any Domino’s Party under the 1933 Act. 
 (xx) None
of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective subsidiaries is a party to any contract, agreement or understanding with any person (other than this Agreement) that would give rise to a valid claim against any of them or the Initial
Purchasers for a brokerage commission, finder’s fee or like payment in connection with the offering and sale of the Offered Notes. 

  
 17 








 (yy) None of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including, without limitation, the
use of the proceeds from the sale of the Offered Notes), will violate or result in a violation of Section 7 of the 1934 Act, or any regulation promulgated thereunder, including, without limitation, Regulations T, U and X of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 
 (zz) None of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective affiliates have taken,
directly or indirectly, any action designed to or that has constituted or that could reasonably be expected to cause or result in the stabilization or manipulation of the price of any security of any Co-Issuer or Guarantor in connection with the
offering of the Offered Notes. 
 (aaa) The Domino’s Parties and their respective affiliates have not taken any action or
omitted to take any action (such as issuing any press release relating to any Offered Notes without an appropriate legend) which may result in the loss by any of the Initial Purchasers of the ability to rely on any stabilization safe harbor provided
by the U.K. Financial Services Authority under the U.K. Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”). 

(bbb) None of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective subsidiaries is in violation of or has received notice of any violation
with respect to any federal or state law relating to discrimination in the hiring, promotion or pay of employees, nor any applicable federal or state wage and hour laws, nor any state law precluding the denial of credit due to the neighborhood in
which a property is situated, the violation of any of which would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 

(ccc) None of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective subsidiaries, nor to the knowledge of the relevant entity,
any director, officer, manager, member, agent, employee, affiliate or other person acting on behalf of such relevant entity, has (i) made any unlawful contribution, gift, entertainment or other unlawful expense relating to political activity;
(ii) made any direct or indirect unlawful payment to any domestic governmental official, “foreign official” (as defined in the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder
(collectively, the “FCPA”) or employee; (iii) violated or is in violation of any provision of the FCPA, the Bribery Act of 2010 of the United Kingdom or any applicable non-U.S. anti-bribery statute or regulation;
(iv) made any bribe, rebate, payoff, influence payment, kickback or other unlawful payment; and (v) received notice of any investigation, proceeding or inquiry by any governmental agency, authority or body regarding any of the matters in
clauses (i)-(iv) above; and the Domino’s Parties and their respective subsidiaries and, to the knowledge of such relevant entity, the relevant entity’s affiliates, have conducted their respective businesses in compliance with the FCPA
and have instituted and maintain policies and procedures designed to ensure, and which are reasonably expected to continue to ensure, continued compliance therewith.  

(ddd) The operations of the Domino’s Parties and each of their respective subsidiaries are and have been conducted at all times in
compliance with applicable financial record-keeping and reporting requirements of the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970, as amended, the money laundering statutes of all jurisdictions, the rules and regulations thereunder and
any related or similar rules, regulations or guidelines issued, administered or enforced by any governmental agency (collectively, the “Money Laundering Laws”) and no action, suit or proceeding by or before any court or
governmental agency, 

  
 18 








 
authority or body or any arbitrator involving any Domino’s Party or any of their respective subsidiaries with respect to the Money Laundering Laws is pending or, to the knowledge of such
relevant entity, threatened. 
 (eee) None of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective subsidiaries nor, to the
knowledge of such relevant entity, any director, officer, agent, employee, affiliate or other person acting on behalf of such relevant entity is currently the subject or target of any sanctions administered or enforced by the United States
Government, including, without limitation, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), the U.S. Department of State, the United Nations Security Council, the European Union, Her
Majesty’s Treasury, or other relevant sanctions authority (collectively, “Sanctions”), nor is such relevant entity located, organized or resident in a country or territory that is the subject of Sanctions; and the
Domino’s Parties and their respective subsidiaries will not directly or indirectly use the proceeds of the offering, or lend, contribute or otherwise make available such proceeds to any subsidiary, joint venture partner or other person or
entity, for the purpose of financing the activities of or business with any person, or in any country or territory, that currently is the subject or target of any Sanctions or in any other manner that will result in a violation by any person
(including any person participating in the transaction whether as underwriter, advisor, investor or otherwise) of Sanctions. 

(fff) There are no transfer taxes or other similar fees or charges under Federal law or the laws of any state, or any political subdivision
thereof, required to be paid in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement or the issuance and sale by the Co-Issuers and the Guarantors of the Offered Notes. 

(ggg) None of the Domino’s Parties nor any of their respective affiliates or representatives, have participated in a plan or scheme to
evade the registration requirements of the 1933 Act through the sale of the Offered Notes pursuant to Regulation S. 
 (hhh) None of the
Domino’s Parties has knowledge that any other party to any material contract being assigned on the Closing Date has any intention not to perform its obligations thereunder in all material respects, except as could not, individually or in the
aggregate, would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. 
 (iii) No forward-looking statement (within the meaning of
Section 27A of the 1933 Act and Section 21E of the 1934 Act) contained in the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum has been made without a reasonable basis or has been disclosed other than in good faith. 

(jjj) The Manager has provided (i) a 17g-5 Representation to S&P (as defined below); (ii) an executed copy of the 17g-5
Representation delivered to S&P (as defined below) has been delivered to the Representative; and (iii) each of the Domino’s Parties has complied in all material respects with each 17g-5 Representation. For purposes of this Agreement,
“17g-5 Representation” means a written representation provided to S&P, which satisfies the requirements of Rule 17g-5(a)(3)(iii) of under the 1934 Act. 

  
 19 








 Any certificate signed by any officer of any Domino’s Party and delivered to the
Representative or counsel for the Representative or any Domino’s Party in connection with the offering of the Offered Notes shall be deemed a representation and warranty by such Domino’s Party, as to matters covered thereby, to the Initial
Purchasers, and not a representation or warranty by the individual (other than in his or her official capacity). 
 3. Purchase of
the Offered Notes by the Initial Purchasers; Agreements to Sell, Purchase and Resell. 
 (a) On the basis of the representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements herein contained, and subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, the Co-Issuers, jointly and severally, agree to sell to each Initial Purchaser and each Initial Purchaser, severally and not jointly,
agrees to purchase from the Co-Issuers, at a purchase price as agreed, in writing, among the Co-Issuers and each Initial Purchaser, the principal amount of Offered Notes set forth opposite their respective names on Schedule I hereto. 

(b) Each of the Initial Purchasers, severally and not jointly, hereby represents and warrants to the Co-Issuers that it will offer the Offered
Notes for sale upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum. Each of the Initial Purchasers, severally and not jointly, hereby represents and warrants to, and agrees
with, the Co-Issuers, on the basis of the representations, warranties and agreements of the Co-Issuers, the Parent Companies, the Manager and the Guarantors, that such Initial Purchaser: (i) is a sophisticated investor with such knowledge and
experience in financial and business matters as are necessary in order to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the Offered Notes; (ii) is purchasing the Offered Notes pursuant to a private sale exempt from registration under the
1933 Act; (iii) in connection with the Exempt Resales, will solicit offers to buy the Offered Notes only from, and will offer to sell the Offered Notes only to, the Eligible Purchasers in accordance with this Agreement and on the terms
contemplated by the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum; and (iv) will not offer or sell the Notes, nor has it offered or sold the Notes by, or otherwise engaged in, any General Solicitation and will not engage in any
directed selling efforts within the meaning of Rule 902 under the 1933 Act, in connection with the offering of the Offered Notes. The Initial Purchasers have advised the Co-Issuers that they will offer the Offered Notes to Eligible Purchasers at an
initial price as set forth in Schedule II hereof, plus accrued interest, if any, from the date of issuance of the Offered Notes. Such price may be changed by the Initial Purchasers at any time without notice. 

(c) Each Initial Purchaser, severally and not jointly, represents and warrants to the Domino’s Parties that: 

(i) It has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to the Offered
Notes in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom, and it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and it will only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the
meaning of Section 21 of the FSMA) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of any Offered Notes, in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the Co-Issuers; and 

  
 20 








 (ii) In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area that has implemented the
Prospectus Directive (each a “relevant member state”), with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that relevant member state (the “relevant implementation date”) an offer of
Offered Notes to the public has not been made and will not be made in that relevant member state other than: 
  

	 	(A)	to any legal entity which is a “qualified investor” as defined in the Prospectus Directive; 

  

	 	(B)	to fewer than 100 or, if the relevant member state has implemented the relevant provision of the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to fewer than 150 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the
Prospectus Directive) as permitted under the Prospectus Directive, subject to obtaining the prior consent of the Issuer; or 

  

	 	(C)	in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive; 

 provided that no
such offer of Offered Notes shall require the Co-Issuers or the Initial Purchasers to publish a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive. For the purposes of this Section 3(c), the expression an “offer of Notes to the
public” in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the Offered Notes to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe to
the Offered Notes, as the same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member State and the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC (and
amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant Member State), and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State and the expression “2010 Amending
Directive” means Directive 2010/73/EU. 
 (d) The Initial Purchasers have not and, prior to the later to occur of (A) the
Closing Date and (B) completion of the distribution of the Offered Notes, will not, use, authorize use of, refer to or distribute any material in connection with the offering and sale of the Offered Notes other than (i) the Preliminary
Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, (ii) any written communication that contains either (x) no “issuer information” (as defined in Rule 433(h)(2) under the 1933 Act) or
(y) “issuer information” that was included (including through incorporation by reference) in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum or (iii) any written communication
prepared by such Initial Purchaser and approved by the Master Issuer (or the Manager on its behalf) in writing. 
 (e) Each Initial
Purchaser hereby acknowledges that upon original issuance thereof, and until such time as the same is no longer required under the applicable requirements of the 1933 Act, the Offered Notes (and all securities issued in exchange therefore or in
substitution thereof) shall bear legends substantially in the forms as set forth in the “Transfer Restrictions” section of the Pricing Disclosure Package and Offering Memorandum (along with such other legends as the Co-Issuers and their
counsel deem necessary). 

  
 21 








 Each of the Initial Purchasers understands that the Co-Issuers and, for purposes of the opinions
to be delivered to the Initial Purchasers pursuant to Sections 7(d) and 7(j) hereof, counsel to the Co-Issuer, and counsel to the Initial Purchasers, will assume the accuracy and truth of the foregoing representations, warranties and agreements, and
the Initial Purchasers hereby consent to such reliance. 
 4. Delivery of the Offered Notes and Payment Therefor. Delivery to
the Initial Purchasers of and payment for the Offered Notes shall be made at the office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, at 10:00 A.M., New York City time, on October 21, 2015 (the “Closing
Date”). The place of closing for the Offered Notes and the Closing Date may be varied by agreement between the Initial Purchasers and the Co-Issuers. 

The Offered Notes will be delivered to the Representative, or the Trustee as custodian for The Depository Trust Company
(“DTC”), against payment by or on behalf of the Representative of the purchase price therefor by wire transfer in immediately available funds, by causing DTC to credit the Offered Notes to the account of the Representative at
DTC. The Offered Notes will be evidenced by one or more global securities with respect to each series in definitive form and will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of DTC. The Offered Notes to be delivered to the
Representative shall be made available to the Initial Purchasers in New York City for inspection and packaging not later than 10:00 A.M., New York City time, on the Business Day next preceding the Closing Date. 

5. Agreements of the Domino’s Parties. The Domino’s Parties, jointly and severally, agree with each of the Initial
Purchasers as follows: 
 (a) The Domino’s Parties will furnish to the Initial Purchasers, without charge, within one
Business Day of the date of the Final Offering Memorandum, such number of copies of the Final Offering Memorandum as may then be amended or supplemented as the Initial Purchasers may reasonably request, provided that such obligation may be
satisfied by delivery of the Final Offering Memorandum and any such amendments and supplements by electronic means, including by e-mail delivery of a PDF file. 

(b) The Domino’s Parties shall provide to the Initial Purchasers, without charge, during the period from the date of this
Agreement until the earlier of (i) 180 days from the date of this Agreement and (ii) such date as of which all of the Offered Notes shall have been sold by the Initial Purchasers (such period, the “Offering
Period”), as many copies of the Final Offering Memorandum and any supplements and amendments thereto, as the Initial Purchasers may reasonably request, provided that such obligation may be satisfied by delivery of the
Final Offering Memorandum and any such amendments and supplements by electronic means, including by e-mail delivery of a PDF file. 

(c) The Domino’s Parties will prepare the Final Offering Memorandum in a form approved by the Representative and will not make any
amendment or supplement to the Pricing Disclosure Package or to the Final Offering Memorandum of which the Representative shall not previously have been advised or to which they shall reasonably object after being so advised. 

  
 22 








 (d) The Domino’s Parties will (i) advise the Representative promptly of (x) any
Commission order preventing or suspending the use of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum or (y) any suspension of the qualification of the Offered Notes or the Guarantee for
offering or sale in any jurisdiction and of the initiation or threatening of any proceeding for any such purpose, and (ii) use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent the issuance of any such order preventing or suspending the use of the
Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum or suspending any such qualification and, if any such suspension is issued, to obtain the lifting thereof at the earliest possible time. 

(e) Each of the Domino’s Parties consents to the use of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum in accordance
with the securities or Blue Sky laws of the jurisdictions in which the Offered Notes are offered by the Initial Purchasers and by all dealers to whom Offered Notes may be sold, in connection with the offering and sale of the Offered Notes. 

(f) If, at any time prior to the end of the Offering Period, any event occurs or information becomes known that, in the judgment of any
Domino’s Party or in the opinion of counsel for the Representative, should be set forth in the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum so that the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum, as then amended
or supplemented, does not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or if it is
necessary to supplement or amend the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum in order to comply with any law, the Domino’s Parties will promptly prepare an appropriate supplement or amendment thereto, and will expeditiously
furnish to the Initial Purchasers a reasonable number of copies thereof. 
 (g) Promptly from time to time, the Domino’s Parties
shall take such action as the Representative may reasonably request to qualify the Offered Notes for offering and sale under the securities or Blue Sky laws of such jurisdictions as the Representative may request, to comply with such laws so as to
permit the continuance of sales and dealings therein in such jurisdictions for as long as may be necessary to complete the distribution of the Offered Notes and to arrange for the determination of the eligibility for investment of the Offered Notes
under the laws of such jurisdictions as the Representative may reasonably request; provided that in connection therewith, none of the Domino’s Parties shall be required to (i) qualify as a foreign corporation, limited liability
company or unlimited company in any jurisdiction in which it would not otherwise be required to so qualify, (ii) file a general consent to service of process in any such jurisdiction or (iii) subject itself to taxation in any jurisdiction
in which it would not otherwise be subject. 
 (h) For a period commencing on the date hereof and ending on the 180th day after the
date of the Final Offering Memorandum, the Domino’s Entities agree not to, directly or indirectly, (i) offer for sale, sell, or otherwise dispose of (or enter into any transaction or device


  
 23 








 
that is designed to, or would be expected to, result in the disposition by any person at any time in the future of) any debt securities of any Domino’s Entity substantially similar
to the Offered Notes (“Similar Debt Securities”) or securities convertible into or exchangeable for Similar Debt Securities, sell or grant options, rights or warrants with respect to Similar Debt Securities or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for Similar Debt Securities, (ii) enter into any swap or other derivatives transaction that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic benefits or risks of ownership of Similar Debt
Securities whether any such transaction described in clause (i) or (ii) above is to be settled by delivery of Similar Debt Securities or other securities, in cash or otherwise, (iii) file or cause to be filed a registration statement,
including any amendments, with respect to the registration of Similar Debt Securities or securities convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into Similar Debt Securities or (iv) publicly announce an offering of any Similar Debt Securities or
securities convertible or exchangeable into Similar Debt Securities, in each case without the prior written consent the Representative. 

(i) So long as any of the Offered Notes are outstanding, the Domino’s Parties will furnish at their expense to the Representative, and,
upon request, to holders of the Offered Notes that agree to certain confidentiality obligations and prospective purchasers of the Offered Notes, the information required by Rule 144A(d)(4) under the 1933 Act (if any). 

(j) The Co-Issuers will apply the net proceeds from the sale of the Offered Notes to be sold by the Co-Issuers hereunder substantially in
accordance with the description set forth in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum under the caption “Use of Proceeds.” 

(k) The Domino’s Parties and their respective affiliates will not take, directly or indirectly, any action designed to or that has
constituted or that reasonably could be expected to cause the stabilization or manipulation of the price of any security of Domino’s Parties in connection with the offering of the Offered Notes. 

(l) Each Domino’s Party will not, and will not permit any of its respective affiliates (as defined in Rule 144) to, resell any of the
Offered Notes that have been acquired by any of them, except for Offered Notes purchased by any of the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective affiliates and resold in a transaction registered under the 1933 Act or in accordance with Rule
144 or other applicable exemption under the 1933 Act. 
 (m) The Domino’s Parties will use their commercially reasonable efforts
to permit the Offered Notes to be eligible for clearance and settlement in the United States through DTC and in Europe through Euroclear Bank, S.A./N.V., or Clearstream Banking, société anonyme. 

(n) The Domino’s Parties will not, and will cause their respective affiliates and representatives not to, engage in any “directed
selling efforts” within the meaning of Rule 902 under the 1933 Act. 
 (o) The Domino’s Parties will, and will cause their
respective affiliates and representatives to, comply with and implement the “offering restrictions” required by Rule 902 under the 1933 Act. 

  
 24 








 (p) The Domino’s Parties agree not to sell, offer for sale or solicit offers to buy or
otherwise negotiate in respect of any security (as defined in the 1933 Act) that would be integrated with the sale of the Offered Notes in a manner that would require the registration under the 1933 Act of the sale to the Initial Purchasers or the
Eligible Purchasers of the Offered Notes. The Domino’s Parties will take reasonable precautions designed to insure that any offer or sale, direct or indirect, in the United States or to any U.S. person (as defined in Rule 902 under the 1933
Act), of any Offered Notes or any substantially similar security issued by any Domino’s Party, within six (6) months subsequent to the date on which the distribution of the Offered Notes has been completed (as notified to the Co-Issuers by
the Representative) is made under restrictions and other circumstances reasonably designed not to affect the status of the offer and sale of the Offered Notes in the United States and to U.S. persons contemplated by this Agreement as transactions
exempt from the registration provisions of the 1933 Act, including any sales pursuant to Rule 144A under, or Regulations D or S of, the 1933 Act. 

(q) The Co-Issuers and the Guarantors agree to comply with all agreements set forth in the representation letters of the Co-Issuers and the
Guarantors to DTC relating to the approval of the Offered Notes by DTC for “book entry” transfer. 
 (r) The Domino’s Parties
will do and perform all things required to be done and performed under this Agreement by them prior to the Closing Date in order to satisfy all conditions precedent to the Initial Purchasers’ obligations hereunder to purchase the Offered Notes.

 (s) During the Offering Period, the Domino’s Parties will not solicit any offer to buy from or offer to sell to any person any
Offered Notes except through the Representative. To the extent that the Offering Period continues beyond the Closing Date, the Representative will provide the Co-Issuers and the Manager written notice of the conclusion of the Offering Period. 

(t) The Domino’s Parties (i) shall complete on or prior to the Closing Date all filings and other similar actions required in
connection with the creation and perfection of security interests in the Collateral as and to the extent required by the Indenture, the Offered Notes, the Guarantees and the other Related Documents and (ii) after the Closing Date, shall
complete all filings and other similar actions that need not be completed on the Closing Date but which may be required in connection with the creation and perfection or maintenance of security interests in the Collateral as and to the extent
required by the Indenture, the Offered Notes, the Guarantees and the other Related Documents. 
 (u) The Domino’s Parties, any of their
respective affiliates or representatives (other than the Initial Purchasers, their affiliates and representatives, as to whom the Domino’s Parties make no covenant) will not engage in any General Solicitation in connection with the offer and
sale of the Offered Notes. 
 (v) The Domino’s Parties will take such steps as shall be necessary to ensure that no such Domino’s
Party becomes required to register as an “investment company” within the meaning of such term under the 1940 Act. 

  
 25 








 (w) No Domino’s Party will take any action which would result in the loss by any Initial
Purchaser of the ability to rely on any stabilization safe harbor provided by the Financial Services Authority under the FSMA. Each Domino’s Party hereby authorizes the Initial Purchasers to make such public disclosure of information relating
to stabilization as is required by applicable law, regulation and guidance. 
 (x) To the extent that the ratings to be
provided with respect to the Offered Notes as set forth in the Pricing Disclosure Package by Standard & Poor’s Rating Group, a Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“S&P”) are conditional upon the
furnishing of documents or the taking of any other actions by Domino’s Parties or any of their respective affiliates, the Domino’s Parties and any of their respective affiliates agree to furnish such documents and take any such other
action that is reasonably requested by the S&P. 
 (y) The Manager shall comply, and shall cause the Co-Issuers to comply,
in all material respects with Rule 17g-5 under the 1934 Act and the 17g-5 Representation. 
 6. Expenses. Whether or not the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement are consummated or this Agreement is terminated, the Domino’s Parties, jointly and severally, agree, to pay all reasonable documented out-of-pocket expenses, costs, fees and taxes incident to and in
connection with: (a) the preparation, printing and distribution of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum (including, without limitation, financial statements and exhibits and one
or more versions of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Final Offering Memorandum, if requested, for distribution in Canada, including in the form of a Canadian “wrapper” (including related fees and expenses of Canadian counsel to
the Initial Purchasers)) and all amendments and supplements thereto (including the fees, disbursements and expenses of the Domino’s Parties’ accountants, experts and counsel); (b) the preparation, printing (including, without
limitation, word processing and duplication costs) and delivery of this Agreement, the Indenture, the Offered Notes, the Guarantees and the other Related Documents, all Blue Sky memoranda and all other agreements, memoranda, correspondence and other
documents printed and delivered in connection therewith and with the Exempt Resales; (c) the issuance and delivery by the Co-Issuers of the Offered Notes and by the Guarantors of the Guarantees and any taxes payable in connection therewith;
(d) the qualification of the Offered Notes for offer and sale under the securities or Blue Sky laws of the several states and any foreign jurisdictions as the Representative may designate (including, without limitation, the reasonable fees and
disbursements of the Initial Purchasers’ counsel relating to such registration or qualification); (e) the furnishing of such copies of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum,
and all amendments and supplements thereto, as may be reasonably requested for use in connection with the Exempt Resales; (f) the preparation of certificates for the Offered Notes (including, without limitation, printing and engraving thereof);
(g) the fees and expenses of the accountants and other experts incurred in connection with the delivery of the comfort letters and “agreed upon procedures” letters to the Representative pursuant to the terms of this Agreement;
(h) the reasonable fees, disbursements and expenses of outside legal counsel to the Representative, the fees of outside accountants, the costs of any diligence service, and the fees of any other third party service provider or advisor retained
by the Representative with the prior approval of the Co-Issuers (not to be unreasonably withheld); (i) the custody of the Offered  

  
 26 








 
Notes and the approval of the Offered Notes by DTC for “book-entry” transfer (including fees and expenses of counsel for the Initial Purchaser); (j) the rating of the Offered
Notes; (k) the obligations of the Trustee, the Servicer, any agent of the Trustee or the Servicer and the counsel for the Trustee or the Servicer in connection with the Indenture, the Offered Notes or the other Related Documents; (l) the
performance by the Domino’s Parties of their other obligations under this Agreement and under the other Related Documents which are not otherwise specifically provided for in this Section 6; (m) all reasonable travel expenses
(including expenses related to chartered aircraft) of the Representative and Domino’s Parties’ officers and employees and any other expenses of each of the Representative, the Domino’s Parties in connection with attending or hosting
meetings with prospective purchasers of the Offered Notes, and expenses associated with any “road show” presentation to potential investors (including any electronic “road show” presentations); (n) compliance with Rule 17g-5
under the 1934 Act; and (o) all sales, use and other taxes (other than income taxes) related to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the Indenture, the Offered Notes or the other Related Documents. 

7. Conditions to Initial Purchasers’ Obligations. The respective obligations of the Initial Purchasers hereunder are
subject to the accuracy, when made and on and as of the Closing Date, of the representations and warranties of the Domino’s Parties contained herein, to the performance by the Domino’s Parties and each of their respective obligations
hereunder, and to each of the following additional terms and conditions: 
 (a) The Final Offering Memorandum (and any amendments or
supplements thereto) shall have been printed and copies distributed to the Initial Purchasers as promptly as practicable on or following the date of this Agreement or at such other date and time as to which the Initial Purchasers may agree. 

(b) The Representative shall not have discovered and disclosed to the Domino’s Parties on or prior to the Closing Date that the Pricing
Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum or any amendment or supplement to any of the foregoing, contains an untrue statement of a fact which, in the opinion of the Representative, is material or omits to state a fact which, in the
opinion of the Representative, is material and is necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances then prevailing, not misleading. 

(c) All corporate proceedings and other legal matters incident to the authorization, form and validity of this Agreement, the Offered Notes,
the Indenture, the other Related Documents, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, and all other legal matters relating to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be reasonably satisfactory in all
material respects to counsel for the Representative, and the Domino’s Parties shall have furnished to such counsel all documents and information that they may reasonably request to enable them to pass upon such matters. 

(d) The Representative shall have received one or more opinions and a negative assurance letter of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, counsel to the Domino’s Parties, with respect to the matters set forth on Exhibit 2-A hereto. 
 (e) The Representative shall
have received an opinion of in-house counsel to the Domino’s Parties, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated the Closing Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Representative and its counsel, which opinion shall
include the opinions set forth on Exhibit 2-B. 

  
 27 








 (f) The Representative shall have received an opinion and negative assurance letter of DLA Piper
LLP (US), franchise counsel to the Domino’s Parties, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated the Closing Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Representative and its counsel, which opinion shall include the relevant
opinions set forth on Exhibit 2-C. 
 (g) The Representative shall have received an opinion from Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone,
P.L.C., Michigan counsel, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated as of the Closing Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Representative and its counsel, which opinion shall include the relevant opinions set forth on
Exhibit 2-C. 
 (h) The Representative shall have received an opinion from Stewart McKelvey, Nova Scotia counsel, Stikeman Elliot LLP,
Alberta, British Columbia and Ontario counsel, Thompson Dorman Sweatman LLP, Manitoba counsel, and Loyens Loeff, Dutch counsel, each addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated as of the Closing Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory
to the Representative and its counsel, which opinions shall include the relevant opinions set forth on Exhibit 2-D. 
 (i) The
Representative shall have received an opinion of Dentons US LLP, counsel to the Trustee, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated as of the Closing Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Representative and its counsel, which
opinion shall include the relevant opinions set forth on Exhibit 2-E. 
 (j) The Representative shall have received an opinion and negative
assurance letter of Andrascik & Tita LLC, counsel to the Servicer, and an opinion of in-house counsel to the Servicer, each addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated the Closing Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the
Representative and its counsel, which opinions shall include the relevant opinions set forth on Exhibit 2-E. 
 (k) The Representative shall
have received a bring down letter to the opinion of in-house counsel to the Back-Up Manager delivered in connection with the issuance and sale of the Series 2012-1 Notes, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated as of the Closing Date, in form
and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Representative and its counsel, which bring-down letter to the opinion shall include the relevant opinions set forth on Exhibit 2-E. 

(l) The Representative shall have received from White & Case LLP, counsel for the Initial Purchasers, such opinions and negative
assurance letter, dated as of the Closing Date, with respect to the issuance and sale of the Offered Notes, the Pricing Disclosure Package, the Final Offering Memorandum and other related matters as the Representative may reasonably require, and the
Domino’s Parties shall have furnished to such counsel such documents and information as such counsel reasonably requests for the purpose of enabling them to pass upon such matters. 

  
 28 








 (m) In addition to the other opinions and letters provided for in this Section 7, the
Representative shall have been provided with any other opinions that have been addressed to S&P in connection with the transactions contemplated herein, and such opinions will be addressed to the Initial Purchasers. 

(n) At the time of execution of this Agreement, the Representative shall have received from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a “comfort
letter”, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Representative, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated the date hereof (i) confirming that they are independent public accountants with respect to Domino’s and its
subsidiaries within the meaning of the 1933 Act and the applicable rules and regulations adopted by the Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and are in compliance with the applicable requirements relating to the qualification
of accountants under Rule-01 of Regulation S-X of the Commission and (ii) stating, as of the date hereof (or, with respect to matters involving changes or developments since the respective dates as of which specified financial information is
given in the Pricing Disclosure Package, as of a date not more than three days prior to the date hereof), the conclusions and findings of such firm with respect to the financial information and (iii) covering such other matters as are
ordinarily covered by accountants’ “comfort letters” to underwriters in connection with registered public offerings. 

(o) With respect to the “comfort letter” of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP referred to in the preceding paragraph and
delivered to the Representative concurrently with the execution of this Agreement (the “initial letter”), PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP shall have furnished to the Representative a “bring-down letter” of such
accountants, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated the Closing Date (i) confirming that they are independent public accountants with respect to Domino’s and its subsidiaries within the meaning of the 1933 Act and the applicable
rules and regulations adopted by the Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and are in compliance with the applicable requirements relating to the qualification of accountants under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X of the
Commission, (ii) stating, as of the Closing Date (or, with respect to matters involving changes or developments since the respective dates as of which specified financial information is given in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package or the
Final Offering Memorandum, as of a date not more than three days prior to the date of the Closing Date), the conclusions and findings of such firm with respect to the financial information and other matters covered by the initial letter, and
(iii) confirming in all material respects the conclusions and findings set forth in the initial letter. 

(p) At the time of execution of this Agreement, the Representative shall have received from FTI Consulting, Inc. a letter (the
“Initial AUP Letter”), in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Initial Purchasers, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated the date hereof, concerning certain agreed-upon procedures performed in respect of
the information presented in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum (including the Investor Model Runs (as defined in Schedule III hereto)). 

(q) With respect to the Initial AUP Letter referred to in the preceding paragraph and delivered to the Representative concurrently with the
execution of this Agreement, FTI Consulting, Inc. shall have furnished to the Representative a “bring-down letter”, addressed to the Initial Purchasers and dated the Closing Date stating, as of the Closing Date (or, with respect to matters
involving changes or developments since the respective dates as 

  
 29 








 
of which specified financial information is given in each of the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum, as of a date not more than three (3) days prior to the Closing
Date), (i) the conclusions and findings of such firm with respect to the matters covered by the Initial AUP Letter, and (ii) confirming in all material respects the conclusions and findings set forth in the Initial AUP Letter. 

(r) (i) None of the Domino’s Parties shall have sustained, since December 28, 2014, any material loss or interference with its
business or properties from fire, explosion, flood, earthquake, hurricane, accident or other calamity, whether or not covered by insurance, or from any labor dispute or any legal or governmental proceeding, other than as set forth in the Pricing
Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum (exclusive of any supplement thereto); and (ii) subsequent to the dates as of which information is given in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum (exclusive of any
supplement thereto), there shall not have been any change in the capital stock or limited liability company interests, as applicable, or long-term or short-term debt of any of the Domino’s Parties or any change, or any development involving a
change, in the business, general affairs, condition (financial or otherwise), results of operations, limited liability company interests, stockholders’ equity, properties, management, business or prospects of the Domino’s Parties and their
respective subsidiaries, individually or taken as a whole, the effect of which, in any such case described above, is, in the judgment of the Representative, so material and adverse as to make it impracticable or inadvisable to proceed with the
offering, sale or delivery of the Offered Notes on the terms and in the manner contemplated in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum. 

(s) Each of the Domino’s Parties shall have furnished or caused to be furnished to the Representative dated as of the Closing Date a
certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of each of the Domino’s Parties, or other officers reasonably satisfactory to the Representative, as to such matters as the Representative may reasonably request, including, without limitation a
statement: 
 (i) that the representations and warranties of the Domino’s Parties in Section 2 are true and correct
on and as of the Closing Date, and (x) the Domino’s Parties have complied in all material respects with all its agreements contained herein and in any other Related Document to which it is a party and satisfied all the conditions on its
part to be performed or satisfied hereunder or any other Related Document to which it is a party at or prior to the Closing Date and (y) the Guarantors acknowledge that the Offered Notes are covered by the obligations of the Guarantee and
Collateral Agreement; 
 (ii) that subsequent to the date as of which information is given in the Pricing Disclosure Package,
there has not been any development in the business, condition (financial or otherwise), results of operations, stockholders’ equity, properties, management, businesses or prospects of any of the Domino’s Parties, as applicable, except as
set forth or contemplated in the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum or as described in such certificate that could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect 

  
 30 








 (iii) that they have carefully examined the Pricing Disclosure Package and the
Final Offering Memorandum, and, in their opinion, (A) the Pricing Disclosure Package, as of the Applicable Time, and the Final Offering Memorandum, as of its date and as of the Closing Date, did not and do not contain an untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading and (B) since the date of the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final
Offering Memorandum, no event has occurred which should have been set forth in a supplement or amendment to the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum; and 

(iv) that (i) none of the Domino’s Parties shall have sustained, since the date of the latest audited financial
statements included or incorporated by reference in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum, any material loss or interference with their business or properties from fire, explosion, flood or other calamity, whether or not
covered by insurance, or from any labor dispute or any legal or governmental proceeding, other than as set forth in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum (exclusive of any supplement thereto); (ii) subsequent to the
dates as of which information is given in Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum (exclusive of any supplement thereto), there shall not have been any change in the capital stock or long-term or short-term debt of any
Domino’s Party or any change or any development involving a change, whether or not arising from transactions in the ordinary course of business, in the business, general affairs, management, condition (financial or otherwise), results of
operations, stockholders’ equity, properties or prospects of the Domino’s Parties and their respective subsidiaries, individually or taken as a whole, the effect of which, in any such case described above, is, in the judgment of the
Representative, so material and adverse as to make it impracticable or inadvisable to proceed with offering, sale or delivery of the Offered Notes on the terms and in the manner contemplated in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering
Memorandum, (iii) no downgrading has occurred in the rating accorded Domino’s or the Manager’s debt securities by any “nationally recognized statistical rating organization,” as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(62)
of the 1934 Act, or (iv) any such organization has publicly announced that it has under surveillance or review, with possible negative implications, its rating of any Domino’s Party debt securities. 

(t) Subsequent to the Applicable Time there shall not have occurred any of the following: (i) downgrading of the rating accorded
Domino’s or the Manager’s debt securities by any “nationally recognized statistical rating organization,” as the term is defined in Section 3(a)(62) of the 1934 Act or (ii) any such organization shall have publicly
announced that it has under surveillance or review, with possible negative implications, its rating of any debt securities of Domino’s or the Manager. The Representative shall have received a letter from S&P stating that the Offered Notes
have received a rating of not less than “BBB+”. 
 (u) The Offered Notes shall be eligible for clearance and settlement in
the United States through DTC and in Europe through Euroclear Bank, S.A./N.V., or Clearstream Banking, société anonyme.  

  
 31 








 (v) The Series 2015-1 Supplement and the Springing Amendments (as defined in Section 9 of
this Agreement) shall each have been duly executed and delivered by the Co-Issuers and the Trustee, in a form satisfactory to the Representative, and the Offered Notes shall have been duly executed and delivered by the Co-Issuers and duly
authenticated by the Trustee. Each of the Series 2015-1 Supplement and the Offered Notes shall have been consummated in accordance with the terms set forth in the Pricing Disclosure Package, the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Final Offering
Memorandum. 
 (w) The Representative shall have received true and executed copies of each of the documents specified in clauses (s), (v),
(z) and (ee). 
 (x) Subsequent to the Applicable Time there shall not have occurred any of the following: (i) any domestic or
international event or act or occurrence has materially disrupted, or in the opinion of the Representative will in the immediate future materially disrupt, the market for the securities of any Domino’s Party or securities in general; or
(ii) trading on the NYSE or NASDAQ shall have been suspended or been made subject to material limitations, or minimum or maximum prices for trading shall have been fixed, or maximum ranges for prices for securities shall have been required on
the NYSE or NASDAQ or by order of the Commission or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction; or (iii) a banking moratorium has been declared by any state or federal authority or any material disruption in commercial banking or
securities settlement or clearance services shall have occurred; or (iv) (A) there shall have occurred any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or acts of terrorism involving the United States or there is a declaration of a national
emergency or war by the United States or (B) there shall have been any other calamity or crisis or any change in political, financial or economic conditions if the effect of any such event in (A) or (B), in the judgment of the
Representative, makes it impracticable or inadvisable to proceed with the offering, sale and delivery of the Offered Notes, on the terms and in the manner contemplated by the Final Offering Memorandum or that, in the judgment of the Initial
Purchasers, could materially and adversely affect the financial markets or the markets for the Offered Notes and other debt securities. 

(y) There shall exist at and as of the Closing Date no condition that would constitute an “Event of Default” (or an event that with
notice or the lapse of time, or both, would constitute an “Event of Default”) under, and as defined in, the Indenture or a material breach under any of the other Related Documents as in effect at the Closing Date (or an event that with
notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute such a default or material breach). On the Closing Date, each of the Related Documents shall be in full force and effect, shall conform in all material respects to the description thereof contained
in the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering Memorandum and shall not have been modified. 
 (z) Each Parent Company, the
Manager, each Guarantor and each Co-Issuer shall have furnished to the Initial Purchasers a certificate, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Representative, dated as of the Closing Date, of the Chief Financial Officer (or, if such
entity has no Chief Financial Officer, of another Authorized Officer) of such entity that such entity will be Solvent immediately after the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 

  
 32 








 (aa) None of (i) the issuance and sale of the Offered Notes pursuant to this Agreement,
(ii) the transactions contemplated by the Related Documents or (iii) the use of the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum shall be subject to an injunction (temporary or permanent) and no restraining order or other
injunctive order shall have been issued; and there shall not have been any legal action, order, decree or other administrative proceeding instituted or (to the knowledge of Domino’s Parties) overtly threatened against the Domino’s Parties
or the Initial Purchasers that would reasonably be expected to adversely impact the issuance of the Offered Notes or the Initial Purchasers’ activities in connection therewith or any other transactions contemplated by the Related Documents or
the Pricing Disclosure Package. 
 (bb) The Representative shall have received evidence satisfactory to the Representative and its counsel
that all UCC-1 financing statements and assignments and other instruments required to be filed on or prior to the Initial Closing Date or the Closing Date pursuant to the Related Documents have been filed. 

(cc) The Representative shall have received evidence satisfactory to the Representative and its counsel that all conditions precedent to the
issuance of the Offered Notes that are contained in the Indenture have been satisfied, including confirmation that the Rating Agency Condition with respect to the Offered Notes has been satisfied. 

(dd) The representations and warranties of each of the Domino’s Parties (to the extent a party thereto) contained in the Related
Documents to which each of the Domino’s Parties is a party will be true and correct as of the Closing Date (i) if qualified as to materiality, in all respects and (ii) if not so qualified, in all material respects as of the Closing
Date (unless stated to relate solely to an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be true and correct (x) if qualified as to materiality in all respects and (y) if not so qualified, in all material respects,
as of such earlier date. 
 (ee) On or prior to the Closing Date, the Parent Companies, the Manager, the Guarantors and the Co-Issuers shall
have furnished to the Initial Purchasers such further certificates and documents as the Representative may reasonably request. 
 All
opinions, letters, evidence and certificates mentioned above or elsewhere in this Agreement shall be deemed to be in compliance with the provisions hereof only if they are in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to counsel for the
Representative. 
 8. Indemnification and Contribution. 

(a) Each of the Domino’s Parties shall, jointly and severally, indemnify and hold harmless each Initial Purchaser, its affiliates,
directors, officers, employees and each person, if any, who controls any Initial Purchaser within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act or Section 20 of the 1934 Act (each, an “Initial Purchaser Indemnified
Party”), against any and all losses, liabilities, claims, damages and expenses whatsoever as incurred (including but not limited to reasonable third party out-of-pocket attorneys’ fees and any and all reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses whatsoever incurred in investigating, preparing or defending against any litigation, commenced or threatened, or any claim whatsoever, and any and all amounts paid in settlement of any claim or litigation), joint or several, to which they
or any of them may become 

  
 33 








 
subject under the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act or otherwise, insofar as such losses, liabilities, claims, damages or expenses (or actions in respect thereof) arise out of or are based upon (i) any
untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material fact contained (A) in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum or in any amendment or supplement thereto, (B) in any
Blue Sky application or other document prepared or executed by any of the Domino’s Parties (or based upon any written information furnished by any of the Domino’s Parties) specifically for the purpose of qualifying any or all of the
Offered Notes under the securities laws of any state or other jurisdiction (any such application, document or information being hereinafter called a “Blue Sky Application”) or (C) in any materials or information provided
to investors by, or with the approval of any of the Domino’s Parties in connection with the marketing of the offering of the Offered Notes, including any road show or investor presentations made to investors by any of the Domino’s Parties
(whether in person or electronically) and the documents and information listed on Schedule III hereto (all of the foregoing materials described in this clause (C), the “Marketing Materials”), (ii) the omission or alleged
omission to state in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum, or in any amendment or supplement thereto, or in any Blue Sky Application or in any Marketing Materials, any material fact
necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, (iii) any act or failure to act or any alleged act or failure to act by any Initial Purchaser in connection with,
or relating in any manner to, the Offered Notes or the offering contemplated hereby, and that is included as part of or referred to in any loss, claim, damage, liability or action or expense arising out of or based upon matters covered by clause
(i) or (ii) above, or (iv) the violation of any securities laws (including without limitation the anti-fraud provision thereof) of any foreign jurisdiction in which the Offered Notes are offered; provided, however, that
the Domino’s Parties will not be liable in any such case to the extent but only to the extent that it is determined in a final and unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction that any such loss, liability, claim, damage or
expense arises directly and primarily out of or is based directly and primarily upon any such untrue statement or alleged untrue statement or omission or alleged omission made therein in reliance upon and in conformity with the Initial Purchaser
Information. The parties agree that such information provided by or on behalf of any Initial Purchaser through the Representative consists solely of the Initial Purchaser Information. 

Each of the Domino’s Parties hereby agrees, jointly and severally, to indemnify and hold harmless each Initial Purchaser Indemnified
Party, against any and all losses, liabilities, claims, damages and expenses whatsoever as incurred (including but not limited to reasonable out-of-pocket attorneys’ fees and any and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses whatsoever incurred in
investigating, preparing or defending against any litigation, commenced or threatened, or any claim whatsoever, and any and all amounts paid in settlement of any claim or litigation), joint or several, to which they or any of them may become
subject, insofar as such loss, claim, damage, liability or action arises out of, or is based upon, any website maintained in compliance with Rule 17g-5 under the 1934 Act by or on behalf of any Domino’s Party in connection with the marketing of
the offering of the Offered Notes. 
 Except as otherwise provided in Section 8(c), each of the Domino’s Parties agrees that it
shall, jointly and severally, reimburse each Indemnified Party promptly upon demand for 

  
 34 








 
any reasonable out-of-pocket legal or other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses reasonably incurred by that Initial Purchaser Indemnified Party in connection with investigating or defending or
preparing to defend against any losses, liabilities, claims, damages or expenses for which indemnity is being provided pursuant to this Section 8(a) as such expenses are incurred. 

The foregoing indemnity agreement will be in addition to any liability which the Domino’s Parties may otherwise have, including but not
limited to other liability under this Agreement. 
 (b) Each Initial Purchaser, severally and not jointly, shall indemnify and hold harmless
each Domino’s Party, each of the officers, directors and employees of each Domino’s Party, and each other person, if any, who controls such Domino’s Party within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act or Section 20 of the
1934 Act (each a “Domino’s Indemnified Party”), against any losses, liabilities, claims, damages and expenses whatsoever as incurred (including but not limited to attorneys’ fees and any and all expenses whatsoever
incurred in investigating, preparing or defending against any litigation, commenced or threatened, or any claim whatsoever, and any and all amounts paid in settlement of any claim or litigation), joint or several, to which they or any of them may
become subject under the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act or otherwise, insofar as such losses, liabilities, claims, damages or expenses (or actions in respect thereof) arise out of or are based upon (i) any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement
of a material fact contained (A) in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum or in any amendment or supplement thereto, (B) in any Blue Sky Application or (C) in any
Marketing Materials, or (ii) the omission or alleged omission to state in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Final Offering Memorandum, or in any amendment or supplement thereto, in any Blue Sky
Application or in any Marketing Materials any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, but in each case only to the extent that the untrue
statement or alleged untrue statement or omission or alleged omission was made in reliance upon and in conformity with written information furnished to any of the Domino’s Parties by or on behalf of any Initial Purchaser through the
Representative expressly for use in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package, the Final Offering Memorandum, amendment or supplement thereto, Blue Sky Application or Marketing Materials (as the case may be, which
information is limited to the Initial Purchaser Information, provided, however, that in no case shall any Initial Purchaser be liable or responsible for any amount in excess of the discount applicable to the Offered Notes to be
purchased by such Initial Purchaser under this Agreement). 
 The foregoing indemnity agreement will be in addition to any liability which
the Initial Purchasers may otherwise have, including but not limited to other liability under this Agreement. 
 (c) Promptly after receipt
by an indemnified party under subsection (a) or (b) above of notice of any claims or the commencement of any action, such indemnified party shall, if a claim in respect thereof is to be made against the indemnifying party under such
subsection, notify each party against whom indemnification is to be sought in writing of the claim or the commencement thereof (but the failure so to notify an indemnifying party shall not relieve the


  
 35 








 
indemnifying party from any liability which it may have under this Section 8 to the extent that it is not materially prejudiced due to the forfeiture of substantive rights or defenses as a
result thereof or otherwise has notice of any such action, and in any event shall not relieve it from any liability that such indemnifying party may have otherwise than on account of the indemnity agreement hereunder). In case any such claim or
action is brought against any indemnified party, and it notifies an indemnifying party of the commencement thereof, the indemnifying party will be entitled to participate, at its own expense in the defense of such action, and to the extent it may
elect by written notice delivered to the indemnified party promptly after receiving the aforesaid notice from such indemnified party, to assume the defense thereof with counsel reasonably satisfactory to such indemnified party; provided,
however, that counsel to the indemnifying party shall not (except with the written consent of the indemnified party) also be counsel to the indemnified party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the indemnified party or parties shall have the
right to employ its or their own counsel in any such case, but the reasonable out-of-pocket fees and expenses of such counsel shall be at the expense of such indemnified party or parties unless (i) the employment of such counsel shall have been
authorized in writing by one of the indemnifying parties in connection with the defense of such action, (ii) the indemnifying parties shall not have employed counsel reasonably satisfactory to such indemnified party to have charge of the
defense of such action within a reasonable time after notice of commencement of the action, (iii) such indemnified party or parties shall have reasonably concluded, based on advice of counsel, that there may be legal defenses available to it or
them which are different from or additional to those available to the indemnifying parties, or (iv) the named parties in any such proceeding (including any impleaded parties) include both the indemnifying party and the indemnified party and
representation of both sets of parties by the same counsel would present a conflict due to actual or potential differing interests between them, in any of which events (i) through (iv) such fees and expenses shall be borne by the
indemnifying parties (and the indemnifying parties shall not have the right to direct the defense of such action on behalf of the indemnified party or parties). No indemnifying party shall, without the prior written consent of the indemnified
parties, effect any settlement or compromise of, or consent to the entry of judgment with respect to, any pending or threatened claim, investigation, action or proceeding in respect of which indemnity or contribution may be or could have been sought
by an indemnified party under this Section 8 (whether or not the indemnified party is an actual or potential party thereto), unless such settlement, compromise or judgment (i) includes an unconditional release of the indemnified party from
all liability arising out of such claim, investigation, action or proceeding and (ii) does not include a statement as to or an admission of fault, culpability or any failure to act, by or on behalf of the indemnified party. No indemnifying
party shall be liable for any settlement or compromise of, or consent to the entry of judgment with respect to, any such action or claim effected without its consent. 

(d) In order to provide for contribution in circumstances in which the indemnification provided for in Section 8(a) through (c) is
for any reason held to be unavailable from any indemnifying party or is insufficient to hold harmless a party indemnified thereunder, the Domino’s Parties and the Initial Purchasers shall contribute to the aggregate losses, claims, damages,
liabilities and expenses of the nature contemplated by such indemnification provision (including any investigation, legal and other expenses incurred in connection with, and any amount paid in settlement of, any action, suit or proceeding or any
claims asserted), but after deducting in the case of losses, claims, damages, liabilities and expenses suffered by the 

  
 36 








 
Domino’s Parties, any contribution received by the Domino’s Parties from persons, other than the Initial Purchasers, who may also be liable for contribution, including their directors,
officers, employees and persons who control the Domino’s Parties within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act or Section 20 of the 1934 Act as incurred to which the Domino’s Parties and one or more of the Initial Purchasers
may be subject, in such proportions as is appropriate to reflect the relative benefits received by the Domino’s Parties and the Initial Purchasers from the offering and sale of the Offered Notes under this Agreement or, if such allocation is
not permitted by applicable law, in such proportions as are appropriate to reflect not only the relative benefits referred to above but also the relative fault of the Domino’s Parties and the Initial Purchasers in connection with the statements
or omissions which resulted in such losses, claims, damages, liabilities or expenses, as well as any other relevant equitable considerations. The relative benefits received by the Domino’s Parties and the Initial Purchasers shall be deemed to
be in the same proportion as the total proceeds from the offering and sale of the Offered Notes under this Agreement (net of discounts and commissions but before deducting expenses) received by the Domino’s Parties or their affiliates under
this Agreement, on the one hand, and the discounts or commissions received by the Initial Purchasers under this Agreement, on the other hand, bear to the aggregate offering price to investors of the Offered Notes purchased under this Agreement, as
set forth on the cover of the Final Offering Memorandum. The relative fault of each of the Domino’s Parties (on the one hand) and of the Initial Purchasers (on the other hand) shall be determined by reference to, among other things, whether the
untrue or alleged untrue statement of a material fact or the omission or alleged omission to state a material fact relates to information supplied by the Domino’s Parties or their affiliates or the Initial Purchasers and the parties’
relative intent, knowledge, access to information and opportunity to correct or prevent such statement or omission. The Domino’s Parties and the Initial Purchasers agree that it would not be just and equitable if contribution pursuant to this
Section 8(d) were determined by pro rata allocation (even if the Initial Purchasers were treated as one entity for such purpose) or by any other method of allocation which does not take account of the equitable considerations referred to above
in this Section 8(d). The aggregate amount of losses, liabilities, claims, damages and expenses incurred by an indemnified party and referred to above in this Section 8(d) shall be deemed to include any legal or other expenses reasonably
incurred by such indemnified party in investigating, preparing or defending against any litigation, or any investigation or proceeding by any judicial, regulatory or other legal or governmental agency or body, commenced or threatened, or any claim
whatsoever based upon any such untrue or alleged untrue statement or omission or alleged omission. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 8(d), (i) no Initial Purchaser shall be required to contribute any amount in excess of the
amount that it has committed to purchase under this Agreement exceeds the amount of any damages which such Initial Purchaser has otherwise been required to pay by reason of such untrue or alleged untrue statement or omission or alleged omission, and
(ii) no person guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation (within the meaning of Section 11(f) of the 1933 Act) shall be entitled to contribution from any person who was not guilty of such fraudulent misrepresentation. For purposes of this
Section 8(d), (A) each of the Initial Purchaser Indemnified Parties other than the Initial Purchasers shall have the same rights to contribution as the Initial Purchasers, and (B) each director, officer or employee of the
Domino’s Parties and each person, if any, who controls the Domino’s Parties within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act or Section 20 of the 1934 Act shall have the same rights to contribution as the Domino’s Parties,
subject in each case of (A) and (B) to clauses (i) and (ii) of the immediately preceding sentence. Any party entitled to 

  
 37 








 
contribution will, promptly after receipt of notice of commencement of any action, suit or proceeding against such party in respect of which a claim for contribution may be made against another
party or parties, notify each party or parties from whom contribution may be sought, but the omission to so notify such party or parties shall not relieve the party or parties from whom contribution may be sought from any obligation it or they may
have under this Section 8(d) or otherwise. The obligations of the Initial Purchasers to contribute pursuant to this Section 8(d) are several in proportion to the respective aggregate principal amount of Offered Notes purchased by each of
the Initial Purchasers under this Agreement and not joint. The obligations of the Domino’s Parties to contribute pursuant to this Section 8(d) shall be joint and several. 

(e) The Initial Purchasers severally confirm and the Domino’s Parties acknowledge and agree that (i) the statements with respect to
the offering of the Offered Notes by the Initial Purchasers set forth in the third to last paragraph (relating to overallotment, stabilization and similar activities) of the section entitled “Plan of Distribution” in the Pricing Disclosure
Package and the Final Offering Memorandum and (ii) the names of the Initial Purchasers set forth on the front and back cover page of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Final Offering Memorandum constitute the only information
concerning such Initial Purchasers furnished in writing to the Domino’s Parties by or on behalf of the Initial Purchasers specifically for inclusion in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Final Offering
Memorandum or in any amendment or supplement thereto or in any Blue Sky Application (the “Initial Purchaser Information”). 

9. Consent. Guggenheim Securities, LLC, in its capacity as the Representative of the Initial
Purchasers, hereby agrees, and each of the holders of the Offered Notes by their acceptance of their Offered Notes is hereby deemed to agree, in their respective capacities as holders of the Offered Notes, to (i) the Third Supplement, to be
dated as of the Closing Date, to the Base Indenture, to be entered into by and among the Co-Issuers and Citibank, N.A., as the Trustee and the securities intermediary thereunder, (ii) the Amendment No. 1, to be dated as of the Closing
Date, to the Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2012, by and among the Co-Issuers, the Guarantors, DPL, Domino’s Pizza NS Co. and Citibank, N.A. as the Trustee, and (iii) the Amendment No. 1, to be
dated as of the Closing Date, to the Parent Company Support Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2012, made by DPL in favor of the Citibank, N.A. as the Trustee (the supplement and amendments identified in clauses (i) through (iii) of
this sentence being referred to herein collectively as the “Springing Amendments” and each, as a “Springing Amendment”, pursuant to which the amendments set forth therein shall become effective upon
the payment in full of the Outstanding Principal Amount of the Series 2012-1 Class A-2 Notes (as such term is defined in the Series 2012-1 Supplement, dated as of March 15, 2012, to the Base Indenture, entered into by and among the
Co-Issuers and Citibank, N.A., as the Trustee and the securities intermediary thereunder), and in their respective capacities as Noteholders hereby direct the Control Party, where such direction from the Noteholders is required, to consent to the
Springing Amendments. 
 10. Termination. The Representative shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any
time prior to the Closing Date, if, at or after the Applicable Time: (i) any domestic or international event or act or occurrence has materially disrupted, or in the opinion of the Representative will in the immediate future materially disrupt,
the market for the Co-Issuers’ 

  
 38 








 
securities or securities in general; or (ii) trading on the NYSE or NASDAQ shall have been suspended or been made subject to material limitations, or minimum or maximum prices for trading
shall have been fixed, or maximum ranges for prices for securities shall have been required, on the NYSE or NASDAQ or by order of the Commission or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction; or (iii) a banking moratorium has been
declared by any state or federal authority or any material disruption in commercial banking or securities settlement or clearance services shall have occurred; or (iv) (A) there shall have occurred any outbreak or escalation of hostilities
or acts of terrorism involving the United States or there is a declaration of a national emergency or war by the United States or (B) there shall have been any other calamity or crisis or any change in political, financial or economic
conditions if the effect of any such event in (A) or (B), in the judgment of the Representative, makes it impracticable or inadvisable to proceed with the offering, sale and delivery of the Offered Notes, on the terms and in the manner
contemplated by the Final Offering Memorandum; or (v) any of the events described in Sections 7(r), 7(t) or 7(x) shall have occurred or the Initial Purchasers shall decline to purchase the Offered Notes for any reason permitted under this
Agreement. Any notice of termination pursuant to this Section 10 shall be in writing. 
 11.
Non-Assignability. None of the Domino’s Parties may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement. The Initial Purchasers may not assign their respective rights and obligations under this Agreement,
except that each Initial Purchaser shall have the right to substitute any one of its affiliates as the purchaser of the Offered Notes that it has agreed to purchase hereunder (“Substituting Initial Purchaser”), by a written
notice to the Co-Issuers, which notice shall be signed by both the Substituting Initial Purchaser and such affiliate, shall contain such affiliate’s agreement to be bound by this Agreement and shall contain a confirmation by such affiliate of
the accuracy with respect to it of the representations set forth in Section 3. Upon receipt of such notice, wherever the word “Initial Purchaser” is used in this Agreement (other than in this Section 11), such word shall be
deemed to refer to such affiliate in lieu of the Substituting Initial Purchaser. 
 12. Reimbursement of Initial
Purchasers’ Expenses. If (a) the Co-Issuers for any reason fail to tender the Offered Notes for delivery to the Initial Purchasers, or (b) the Initial Purchasers decline to purchase the Offered Notes for any reason permitted under
this Agreement, the Co-Issuers, the Parent Companies, the Manager and the Guarantors shall jointly and severally reimburse the Initial Purchasers for all reasonable documented out-of-pocket expenses (including fees and disbursements of counsel for
the Initial Purchasers) incurred by the Initial Purchasers in connection with this Agreement and the proposed purchase of the Offered Notes, and upon demand shall pay the full amount thereof to the Initial Purchasers.  

13. Notices, etc. All statements, requests, notices and agreements hereunder shall be in writing, and: 

(a) if to Guggenheim Securities, LLC as the Representative of the Initial Purchasers or any of the other Initial Purchasers, shall be
delivered or sent by hand delivery, mail, overnight courier or e-mail to Guggenheim Securities, LLC, 330 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10017, Attention: Structured Products Capital Markets (e-mail: Cory.Wishengrad@guggenheimpartners.com;
Marina.Pristupova@guggenheimpartners.com), 

  
 39 








 
with a copy to the General Counsel (e-mail: alex.sheers@guggenheim.com) and with a copy to White & Case LLP, 1155 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036, Attention: David
Thatch (e-mail: dthatch@whitecase.com); and 
 (b) if to any of the Co-Issuers or the Guarantors, shall be delivered or sent by hand
delivery, mail, overnight courier, with a copy by e-mail, to Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, P.O. Box 485, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, Attention: Adam Gacek (e-mail: adam.gacek@dominos.com), with a copy to Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP, Four Times Square, New York, New York, 10036, Attention: David H. Midvidy, Esq. (e-mail: david.midvidy@skadden.com); and 

(c) if to any of the Parent Companies, or the Manager, shall be delivered or sent by hand delivery, mail, overnight courier, with a copy by
e-mail, to Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, P.O. Box 485, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, Attention: Adam Gacek (e-mail: adam.gacek@dominos.com), with a copy to Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Four Times Square, New
York, New York, 10036, Attention: David H. Midvidy, Esq. (e-mail: david.midvidy@skadden.com). 
 Any such statements, requests, notices or agreements shall
take effect at the time of receipt thereof. 
 14. Persons Entitled to Benefit of Agreement. This Agreement shall inure to the
benefit of and be binding upon the Initial Purchasers, the Domino’s Parties and their respective successors. This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof are for the sole benefit of only those persons, except that the representations,
warranties, indemnities and agreements of Domino’s Parties contained in this Agreement shall also be deemed to be for the benefit of the Initial Purchaser Indemnified Parties and, in the case of Section 8(b) only, the Domino’s
Indemnified Parties. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be construed to give any person, other than the persons referred to in this Section 14, any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or in respect of this Agreement or
any provision contained herein. 
 15. Survival. The respective indemnities, rights of contribution, representations,
warranties and agreements of any of the Domino’s Parties and the Initial Purchasers contained in this Agreement or made by or on behalf of them, respectively, pursuant to this Agreement, shall survive the delivery of and payment for the Offered
Notes and shall remain in full force and effect, regardless of any termination of this Agreement or any investigation made by or on behalf of any of them or any person controlling any of them. 

16. Definition of the Terms “Business Day”, “Affiliate”, and “Subsidiary”. For purposes of this
Agreement, (a) “business day” means any day on which the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. is open for trading, and (b) “affiliate” and “subsidiary” have the meanings set forth in Rule 405 under the 1933 Act.

 17. Governing Law. This Agreement and any claim, controversy or dispute arising under or related to
this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 

  
 40 








 18. Submission to Jurisdiction and Venue. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably
and unconditionally: 
 (a) submits for itself and its property in any legal action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any of the
transactions contemplated hereby, or for recognition and enforcement of any judgment in respect thereof, to the non-exclusive general jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York, the courts of the United States for the Southern District of
New York, and appellate courts from any thereof; 
 (b) consents that any such action or proceeding may be brought in such courts and waives
any objection that it may now or hereafter have to the venue of any such action or proceeding in any such court or that such action or proceeding was brought in an inconvenient court and agrees not to plead or claim the same; 

(c) agrees that service of process in any such action or proceeding may be effected by mailing a copy thereof by registered or certified mail
(or any substantially similar form of mail), postage prepaid, to any party hereto at its address set forth in Section 13 or at such other address of which such party shall have been notified pursuant thereto; and 

(d) agrees that nothing herein shall affect the right to effect service of process in any other manner permitted by law or shall limit the
right to sue in any other jurisdiction; and waives, to the maximum extent not prohibited by law, any right it may have to claim or recover in any legal action or proceeding referred to in this Section 18 any special, exemplary, punitive or
consequential damages. 
 Each of Domino’s Parties and each of the Initial Purchasers agree that any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or based
upon this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby may be instituted in any State or U.S. federal court in The City of New York and County of New York, and waives any objection that such party may now or hereafter have to the laying of
venue of any such proceeding, and irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in any suit, action or proceeding. 
 19.
Waiver of Jury Trial. The Co-Issuers, the Parent Companies, the Manager, the Guarantors and each of the Initial Purchasers hereby irrevocably waive, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any and all right to trial by jury in any
legal proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. 
 20. No Fiduciary Duty. The
Domino’s Parties acknowledge and agree that (a) the purchase and sale of the Offered Notes pursuant to this Agreement, including the determination of the offering price of the Offered Notes and any related discounts and commissions, is an
arm’s-length commercial transaction between the Domino’s Parties, on the one hand, and the several Initial Purchasers, on the other hand, (b) in connection with the offering, sale and the delivery of the Offered Notes and the process
leading thereto, each Initial Purchaser and their respective representatives are and have been acting solely as a principal and is not the agent or fiduciary of any Domino’s Party, any of its respective subsidiaries or its respective
stockholders, creditors, employees or any other party, (c) no Initial Purchaser or any of their respective representatives has assumed or will assume an advisory, agency or fiduciary responsibility in


  
 41 








 
favor of any Domino’s Party with respect to the offering, sale and delivery of the Offered Notes or the process leading thereto (irrespective of whether such Initial Purchaser or its
representative has advised or is currently advising the Domino’s Parties or any of their respective subsidiaries on other matters) and no Initial Purchaser or its respective representative has any obligation to the Domino’s Parties with
respect to the offering of the Offered Notes except the obligations expressly set forth in this Agreement, (d) the Initial Purchasers and their respective affiliates and representatives may be engaged in a broad range of transactions that
involve interests that differ from those of the Domino’s Parties, (e) any duties and obligations that the Initial Purchasers may have to the Domino’s Parties shall be limited to those duties and obligations specifically stated herein,
and (f) the Initial Purchasers have not provided any legal, accounting, regulatory or tax advice with respect to the offering of the Offered Notes and the Domino’s Parties have consulted their own respective legal, accounting, regulatory
and tax advisors to the extent they deemed appropriate. The Domino’s Parties hereby waive any claims that they each may have against the Initial Purchasers with respect to any breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the Offered Notes. 

21. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, including by facsimile and other means of
electronic transmission, and, if executed in more than one counterpart, the executed counterparts shall each be deemed to be an original but all such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. 

22. Headings. The headings herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be part of, or to
affect the meaning or interpretation of, this Agreement. 
 23. Severability. In case any provision of this Agreement
shall be deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 

  
 42 








 If the foregoing correctly sets forth the agreement among the Domino’s Parties and the
Initial Purchasers, please indicate your acceptance in the space provided for that purpose below. 
  

					
	Very truly yours,
		
		 	DOMINO’S PIZZA MASTER ISSUER LLC
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:
		
		 	DOMINO’S PIZZA DISTRIBUTION LLC
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:
		
		 	DOMINO’S IP HOLDER LLC
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:
		
		 	DOMINO’S SPV CANADIAN HOLDING COMPANY INC.
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:



  
 [Signature Page to
Purchase Agreement] 









					
		 	DOMINO’S PIZZA LLC
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:
		
		 	DOMINO’S PIZZA, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:
		
		 	DOMINO’S, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	  

		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:


  

					
	Accepted:
	
	 GUGGENHEIM SECURITIES, LLC,
 acting
on behalf of itself and as the Representative of the Initial Purchasers

		
	By	 	  

		 	Name:	 	Cory Wishengrad
		 	Title:	 	Senior Managing Director


  
 [Signature Page to
Purchase Agreement] 








 SCHEDULE I 
  

					
	 Initial Purchasers
	  	Principal
Amount of
Series 2015-1 Class
A-2-I Notes
to
be
Purchased	 
	 Guggenheim Securities, LLC
	  	$	450,000,000	  
	 Goldman, Sachs & Co.
	  	 	25,000,000	  
	 Rabo Securities USA, Inc.
	  	 	25,000,000	  
		  	  
	  
	 
	 Total
	  	$	500,000,000	  
		  	  
	  
	 

  

					
	 Initial Purchasers
	  	Principal
Amount of
Series 2015-1 Class
A-2-II Notes
to
be
Purchased	 
	 Guggenheim Securities, LLC
	  	$	720,000,000	  
	 Goldman, Sachs & Co.
	  	 	40,000,000	  
	 Rabo Securities USA, Inc.
	  	 	40,000,000	  
		  	  
	  
	 
	 Total
	  	$	800,000,000	  
		  	  
	  
	 








 SCHEDULE II 

PRICING TERM SHEET 

DOMINO’S PIZZA MASTER ISSUER LLC 

DOMINO’S PIZZA DISTRIBUTION LLC 

DOMINO’S IP HOLDER LLC 

DOMINO’S SPV CANADIAN HOLDING COMPANY INC. 

Pricing Supplement dated October 14, 2015 to the Preliminary Offering Memorandum dated September 28, 2015 

$500,000,000 SERIES 2015-1 3.484% FIXED RATE SENIOR SECURED
NOTES, CLASS A-2-I 
 $800,000,000 SERIES 2015-1 4.474% FIXED
RATE SENIOR SECURED NOTES, CLASS A-2-II 
  

 

			
	 Gross Proceeds to the Co-Issuers:
	  	
		
	 Class A-2-I
	  	$500,000,000
		
	 Class A-2-II
	  	$800,000,000
		
	 Price to Investors:
	  	
		
	 Class A-2-I
	  	100.0%
		
	 Class A-2-II
	  	100.0%
		
	 Interest/Coupon Rate:
	  	
		
	 Class A-2-I
	  	3.484% per annum
		
	 Class A-2-II
	  	4.474% per annum
		
	 Ratings (S&P):
	  	“BBB+”
		
	 Trade Date:
	  	October 14, 2015
		
	 Closing Date:
	  	October 21, 2015 (T+5)
		
	 Initial Purchasers
	  	Guggenheim Securities, LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Rabo Securities USA, Inc.









			
	Anticipated Repayment Date:	  	
		
	 Class A-2-I
	  	Quarterly Payment Date occurring in October 2020
		
	 Class A-2-II
	  	Quarterly Payment Date occurring in October 2025
		
	Series 2015-1 Legal Final Maturity Date:	  	Quarterly Payment Date occurring in October 2045
		
	First Quarterly Payment Date:	  	January 25, 2016
		
	Quarterly Collection Period:	  	Each period of 12 or 16 (or 17) weeks corresponding to the three 12-week and one 16-week (or 17-week) quarters used by the Securitization Entities in connection with their 52 or 53 week fiscal year.
		
	Interest Period	  	For purposes of the first Quarterly Payment Date, the Interest Period for the Offered Notes will be the period from and including the Closing Date to but excluding January 25, 2016, which, for the avoidance of doubt, will be 94 days
as calculated on a “30/360” basis.
		
	Series 2015-1 Quarterly Post-ARD Contingent Interest:	  	A per annum rate equal to the rate determined by the Servicer to be the greater of (i) 5.00% per annum and (ii) a per annum rate equal to the amount, if any, by which (a) the sum of (x) the yield to maturity (adjusted to a quarterly
bond-equivalent basis) on the Series 2015-1 Anticipated Repayment Date of the United States Treasury Security having a term closest to 10 years, plus (y) 5.00%, plus (z) (1) with respect to the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-I Notes, 2.192% and (2) with
respect to the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-II Notes, 2.589% exceeds (b) the Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Note Rate with respect to such Tranche.









			
	Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Make-Whole Prepayment Premium:	  	 I. The following revisions in red ink are hereby made to pages 14-15 of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Preliminary Offering
Memorandum is hereby amended as follows:
  
 “The Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Make-Whole
Prepayment Premium will be payable by the Co-Issuers on any payment of principal of a Tranche of the Offered Notes prior to the Series 2015-1 Anticipated Repayment Date of such Tranche except (without duplication):

 
 •      (i)
with respect to the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-I Notes, prepayments made on or after the Quarterly Payment Date in April 2018, and (ii) with respect to the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-II Notes, prepayments made on or after the Quarterly Payment Date in
October 2022 (with respect to each Tranche, the dates set forth in clause (i) and (ii) are referred to as the “Make-Whole End Date” for such Tranche);

 

•      solely with respect to the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-II Notes, if all
Outstanding Notes will be prepaid (including by refinancing) in full, on any day from and including January 1, 2018 to and including December 31, 2018;
  

•      prepayments made in connection with Indemnification Payments; and

 
 •      Series
2015-1 Class A-2 Scheduled Principal Payments (including those paid at the election of the Master Issuer if the Series Non-Amortization Test is satisfied) and any Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Scheduled Principal Deficiency Amounts.

 
 The “Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Make-Whole Prepayment Premium” will be an
amount (not less than zero) calculated by the Manager, on behalf of the Master Issuer, equal to:
  

(A)  (i) with respect to the applicable Tranche of the Offered Notes, the discounted present value as of the
relevant Series 2015-1 Make-Whole Premium Calculation Date of all future installments of interest on and principal of such Tranche that the Co-Issuers would otherwise be required to pay on such Tranche (or such
portion










			
		  	 thereof to be prepaid) from the date of such prepayment to and including the applicable Make-Whole End Date, assuming
principal payments are made pursuant to the then-applicable schedule of payments (giving effect to any ratable reductions in the Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Scheduled Principal Payments due to optional and mandatory prepayments, including prepayments in
connection with a Rapid Amortization Event, and cancellations of repurchased Notes prior to the date of such prepayment and assuming the Series 2015-1 Senior Notes Scheduled Principal Payments (or ratable amounts thereof based on the principal of
such Tranche (or portion thereof) being prepaid) are to be made on each Quarterly Payment Date prior to such Make-Whole End Date and the entire remaining unpaid principal amount of such Tranche of Offered Notes or portion thereof is paid on the
applicable Make-Whole End Date for such Tranche minus (ii) the Outstanding Principal Amount of such Tranche of Offered Notes (or portion thereof) being prepaid; and
  

(B)  with respect to the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-II Notes, if (1) all Outstanding Notes will be prepaid in
full (2) from Indebtedness proceeds that are not incurred, in whole or in part, from a securitization transaction (which includes any transaction with an “sf” rating) involving any of Holdco and its affiliates (3) on any day from and
including January 1, 2018 to and including December 31, 2018, then the Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Make Whole Prepayment Premium will be equal to (x) 101% of the Outstanding Principal Amount of the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-II Notes minus
(y) the Outstanding Principal Amount of the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-II Notes.
  

For the purposes of the calculation of the discounted present value in clause (A)(i) above, such present value will be determined by
the Manager using a discount rate equal to the sum of (x) the yield to maturity (adjusted to a quarterly bond equivalent basis), on the Series 2015-1 Make-Whole Premium Calculation Date for such Tranche, of the United States Treasury Security having
a maturity closest to the Make-Whole End Date for such Tranche










			
		  	 plus (y) 0.50%. The Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Make-Whole Prepayment Premium will be payable on any prepayment of
principal Outstanding under the Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Notes made during a Rapid Amortization Period, provided that the failure to pay the Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Make-Whole Prepayment Premium on any such prepayments occurring prior to the
Series 2015-1 Legal Final Maturity Date or any other date on which the Offered Notes must be paid in full will not be an Event of Default.”
  

II. The following revisions in red ink are hereby made to page 146 of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Preliminary Offering Memorandum is hereby
amended as follows:
  
 “Make-Whole Prepayment Premiums

 
 The Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Make-Whole Prepayment Premium will be
payable by the Co-Issuers on any payment of principal of the Offered Notes prior to the Series 2015-1 Anticipated Repayment Date except (without duplication):
  

•      prepayments made on or after an applicable Make-Whole End Date;

 

•      solely with respect to the Series 2015-1 Class A-2-II Notes, if all
Outstanding Notes will be prepaid (including by refinancing) in full, on any day from and including January 1, 2018 to and including December 31, 2018;
  

•      prepayments made in connection with Indemnification Payments; and

 
 •      Series
2015-1 Class A-2 Scheduled Principal Payments (including those paid at the election of the Master Issuer if the Series Non-Amortization Test is satisfied) and any Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Scheduled Principal Deficiency Amounts.

 
 The Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Make-Whole Prepayment Premium will be payable on any
prepayment of principal Outstanding under the Series 2015-1 Class A-2 Notes made during a Rapid Amortization Period, provided that the failure to pay the Series 2015-1 Class A-2
Make-Whole










			
		  	Prepayment Premium on any such prepayments occurring prior to the Series 2015-1 Legal Final Maturity Date or any other date when the Offered Notes must be paid in full will not be an Event of Default.”
		
	Capitalization of Holdco	  	The section titled “CAPITALIZATION OF HOLDCO” on page 68 of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum is hereby replaced in its entirety by Exhibit A to this Pricing Supplement.
		
	Capitalization of the Master Issuer	  	The section titled “CAPITALIZATION OF THE MASTER ISSUER” on page 69 of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum is hereby replaced in its entirety by Exhibit B to this Pricing Supplement.
		
	Rule 144A CUSIP/ISIN Numbers:	  	
		
	 Class A-2-I
	  	25755T AD2/US25755TAD28
		
	 Class A-2-II
	  	25755T AE0/US25755TAE01
		
	Reg S CUSIP/ISIN Numbers	  	
		
	 Class A-2-I
	  	U2583E AD9/USU2583EAD95
		
	 Class A-2-II
	  	U2583E AE7/USU2583EAE78
		
	Distribution:	  	Rule 144A and Reg S Compliant

 This Pricing Supplement (this “Pricing Supplement”) is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Preliminary Offering Memorandum, dated September 28, 2015, of Domino’s Pizza Master Issuer LLC, Domino’s Pizza Distribution LLC, Domino’s IP Holder LLC and Domino’s SPV Canadian Holding Company Inc. (the
“Preliminary Offering Memorandum”). The information in this Pricing Supplement supersedes the information in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum to the extent inconsistent with the information in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum.
Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein have the meanings assigned in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum. 
 THE OFFERED NOTES ARE
SOLELY THE JOINT AND SEVERAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE CO-ISSUERS (GUARANTEED BY THE GUARANTORS). THE OFFERED NOTES DO NOT REPRESENT OBLIGATIONS OF THE MANAGER OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES (OTHER THAN THE CO-ISSUERS AND THE GUARANTORS), OFFICERS, DIRECTORS,
SHAREHOLDERS, MEMBERS, PARTNERS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES OR 







 
AGENTS. THE OFFERED NOTES ARE NOT INSURED OR GUARANTEED BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY. THE OFFERED NOTES REPRESENT NON-RECOURSE OBLIGATIONS OF THE CO-ISSUERS (GUARANTEED BY THE GUARANTORS) AND ARE
PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE COLLATERAL, AND PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD MAKE AN INVESTMENT DECISION BASED UPON AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE COLLATERAL. 

THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE OFFERED NOTES HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “1933 ACT”),
OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS, AND NO SERIES 2015-1 CLASS A-2 NOTEHOLDER WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE SUCH REGISTRATION. THE OFFERED NOTES MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD IN THE UNITED STATES OR TO U.S. PERSONS (AS DEFINED IN RULE 902 UNDER THE 1933
ACT) UNLESS THE OFFERED NOTES ARE REGISTERED UNDER THE 1933 ACT OR AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS IS AVAILABLE. THE OFFERED NOTES ARE BEING SOLD ONLY TO (I) PERSONS WHO ARE NOT COMPETITORS AND WHO ARE “QUALIFIED
INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS” UNDER RULE 144A UNDER THE 1933 ACT, (II) PERSONS WHO ARE NOT COMPETITORS AND WHO ARE NOT “U.S. PERSONS” IN OFFSHORE TRANSACTIONS IN RELIANCE ON REGULATION S UNDER THE 1933 ACT OR (III) THE CO-ISSUERS OR AN
AFFILIATE OF THE CO-ISSUERS. BECAUSE THE OFFERED NOTES ARE NOT REGISTERED, THEY ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON RESALE DESCRIBED UNDER “TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS” IN THE PRELIMINARY OFFERING MEMORANDUM. 







 EXHIBIT A 

CAPITALIZATION OF HOLDCO 

Substantially all of the revenue-generating assets of Domino’s (other than the Company-Owned Stores) are held by the Securitization
Entities. DPL serves as the Manager operating the System on behalf of the Securitization Entities. The capitalization of Holdco is presented on a consolidated basis. Only assets that are part of the Collateral will be available to the Co-Issuers to
pay interest on and principal of the Offered Notes. Neither Holdco nor any subsidiary of Holdco, other than the Securitization Entities, will guarantee or in any way be liable for the obligations of the Co-Issuers under the Indenture or
the Offered Notes, or any other obligation of the Co-Issuers in connection with the Series 2015-1 Senior Notes. 
 The
following table sets forth the cash and cash equivalents and capitalization of Holdco as of June 14, 2015 (i) on an actual basis and (ii) on an as-adjusted basis to give effect to the transactions contemplated to occur on or prior to
the Closing Date in connection with the issuance of the Series 2015-1 Senior Notes on the Closing Date, including the partial repayment of the Series 2012-1 Senior Notes, as if such transactions occurred as of
such date. This table should be read in conjunction with “Use of Proceeds,” “Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Information and Other Data of Holdco” and Holdco’s historical consolidated financial
statements and the related notes thereto incorporated by reference into this Offering Memorandum. 
  

									
	 	  	As of June 14, 2015	 
	(dollars in thousands)	  	Actual	 	  	As-Adjusted	 
	 	  	(Unaudited)	 
	 Cash and cash equivalents
	  	$	25,891	  	  	$	747,768	  
			
	 Debt and capital lease obligations:
	  				  			
	 Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes(1)
	  	$	—  	  	  	$	—  	  
	 Series 2012-1 Class A-2 Notes(2)
	  	 	1,521,844	  	  	 	943,721	  
	 Series 2015-1 Class A-1 Notes(3)
	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  
	 Offered Notes
	  	 	—  	  	  	 	1,300,000	  
	 Capital lease obligations
	  	 	5,554	  	  	 	5,554	  
		  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 
			
	 Total debt and capital lease obligations
	  	$	1,527,398	  	  	$	2,249,275	  

  

	(1)	Represents amounts outstanding with respect to the Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes, which are variable funding notes that were issued by the Co-Issuers on March 15, 2012. The Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes
have a maximum outstanding principal amount of $100 million and a final legal maturity of January 2042. Notwithstanding the refinancing transaction, the Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes have an expected repayment date of January 2017, with an
option for up to two one-year renewals (subject to certain conditions, including a minimum debt service coverage ratio). All amounts outstanding under the Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes will be repaid and the Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes
will be cancelled on or about October 26, 2015. See “Use of Proceeds” herein. 


	(2)	The Series 2012-1 Class A-2 Notes were issued by the Co-Issuers on March 15, 2012 and have a final legal maturity of January 2042. Notwithstanding the refinancing transaction, the Series 2012-1 Class A-2
Notes have an expected repayment date of January 2019. Approximately $578.1 million outstanding under the Series 2012-1 Class A-2 Notes will be repaid (consisting of approximately $551 million for the repayment of the Series 2012-1
Class A-2 Notes and approximately $27 million in Senior Notes Scheduled Principal Catch-Up Amounts for the Series 2012-1 Senior Notes). See “Use of Proceeds” herein. 


	(3)	Represents the Series 2015-1 Class A-1 Notes, which are variable funding notes that will be issued on the Closing Date. The Series 2015-1 Class A-1 Notes have a maximum outstanding principal amount of $125
million. The Master Issuer does not anticipate drawing on the Series 2015-1 Class A-1 Notes on the Closing Date. The Master Issuer expects to have approximately $43.2 million in undrawn letters of credit issued under the Series 2015-1
Class A-1 Notes on or about the Closing Date. See “Use of Proceeds” herein. 








 EXHIBIT B 

CAPITALIZATION OF THE MASTER ISSUER 

Substantially all of the revenue-generating assets of Domino’s (other than the Company-Owned Stores) are held by the Securitization
Entities. DPL serves as the Manager operating the System on behalf of the Securitization Entities. The capitalization of the Master Issuer is presented on a consolidated basis. Only assets that are part of the Collateral will be available to the
Co-Issuers to pay interest on and principal of the Offered Notes. 
 The following table sets forth the cash and cash equivalents and
capitalization of the Master Issuer as of June 14, 2015 (i) on an actual basis and (ii) on an as-adjusted basis to give effect to the refinancing transaction, including the partial repayment of the Series 2012-1 Senior Notes, as if such transactions occurred as of such date. 
  

									
	 	  	As of June 14, 2015	 
	(dollars in thousands)	  	Actual	 	  	As Adjusted	 
	 	  	(Unaudited)	 
	 Cash and cash equivalents
	  	$	—  	  	  	$	—  	  
			
	 Debt:
	  				  			
	 Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes(1)
	  	$	—  	  	  	$	—  	  
	 Series 2012-1 Class A-2 Notes(2)
	  	 	1,521,844	  	  	 	943,721	  
	 Series 2015-1 Class A-1 Notes(3)
	  	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  
	 Offered Notes
	  	 	—  	  	  	 	1,300,000	  
	 Capital lease obligations
	  	 	5,554	  	  	 	5,554	  
		  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 
	 Total debt and capital lease obligations
	  	$	1,527,398	  	  	$	2,249,275	  

  

	(1)	Represents amounts outstanding with respect to the Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes, which are variable funding notes that were issued by the Co-Issuers on March 15, 2012. The Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes
have a maximum outstanding principal amount of $100 million and a final legal maturity of January 2042. Notwithstanding the refinancing transaction, the Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes have an expected repayment date of January 2017, with an
option for up to two one-year renewals (subject to certain conditions, including a minimum debt service coverage ratio). All amounts outstanding under the Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes will be repaid and the Series 2012-1 Class A-1 Notes
will be cancelled on or about October 26, 2015. See “Use of Proceeds” herein. 


	(2)	The Series 2012-1 Class A-2 Notes were issued by the Co-Issuers on March 15, 2012 and have a final legal maturity of January 2042. Notwithstanding the refinancing transaction, the Series 2012-1 Class A-2
Notes have an expected repayment date of January 2019. Approximately $578.1 million outstanding under the Series 2012-1 Class A-2 Notes will be repaid (consisting of approximately $551 million for the repayment of the Series 2012-1
Class A-2 Notes and approximately $27 million in Senior Notes Scheduled Principal Catch-Up Amounts for the Series 2012-1 Senior Notes). See “Use of Proceeds” herein. 


	(3)	Represents the series 2015-1 Class A-1 Notes, which are variable funding notes that will be issued on the Closing Date. The Series 2015-1 Class A-1 Notes have a maximum outstanding principal amount of $125
million. The Master Issuer does not anticipate drawing on the Series 2015-1 Class A-1 Notes on the Closing Date. The Master Issuer expects to have approximately $43.2 million in undrawn letters of credit issued under the Series 2015-1
Class A-1 Notes on or about the Closing Date. See “Use of Proceeds” herein. 








 SCHEDULE III 
  

	A.	Additional Materials provided to Investors in connection with the Preliminary Offering Memorandum: 

  

	 	1.	Model runs and the inputs and outputs thereto and thereof provided to prospective investors with respect to the Preliminary Offering Memorandum (the final runs, the “Investor Model Runs”), which
Investor Model Runs have been subject to the procedures set forth in the Initial AUP Letter, based on the Excel files titled: 

  

					
	 Number
	  	 File Name
	  	 Scenario Name

	1	  	DPZ 2015-1 vGeneric 9.23.15.xlsm	  	Zero_Growth_Case
	2	  	DPZ 2015-1 vGeneric 9.23.15.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Haircut
	3	  	DPZ 2015-1 vGeneric 9.23.15.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Annual
	4	  	DPZ 2015-1 vGeneric 9.23.15.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Haircut (2012 Legal Final)
	5	  	DPZ 2015-1 vGeneric 9.23.15.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Annual (2012 Legal Final)
	6	  	DPZ 2015-1 v10.xlsm	  	Zero_Growth_Case
	7	  	DPZ 2015-1 v10.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Haircut
	8	  	DPZ 2015-1 v10.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Annual
	9	  	DPZ 2015-1 v10.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Haircut (2012 Legal Final)
	10	  	DPZ 2015-1 v10.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Annual (2012 Legal Final)
	11	  	DPZ 2015-1 _All ARD 10yr.xlsm	  	Zero_Growth_Case
	12	  	DPZ 2015-1 _All ARD 10yr.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Haircut
	13	  	DPZ 2015-1 _All ARD 10yr.xlsm	  	BE_thruPRIN_Case_Annual
	14	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 1-i
	15	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 1-ii
	16	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 1-iii
	17	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 2-i
	18	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 2-ii
	19	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 2-iii
	20	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 3a-i
	21	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 3a-ii
	22	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 3a-iii
	23	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 3b-i
	24	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 3b-ii
	25	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 3b-iii
	26	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 4a-i
	27	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 4a-ii
	28	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 4a-iii
	29	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 4b-i
	30	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 4b-ii
	31	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 4b-iii
	32	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 5
	33	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 6
	34	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 7









					
	35	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 8-i
	36	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 8-ii
	37	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v4.xlsx	  	10.4.15 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 9
	38	  	 2015.10.06_Client

2_DPZ_Model_Scenario_BE_thruARDINT_Case_Annual.xlsm
	  	Client 2 – BE_thruARDINT_Case_Annual
	39	  	 2015.10.06_Client

2_DPZ_Model_Scenario_BE_thruARDINT_Case_Haircut.xlsm
	  	Client 2 – BE_thruARDINT_Case_Haircut
	40	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v10-6-15 v2.xlsx	  	10.6.2015 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 1-i
	41	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v10-6-15 v2.xlsx	  	10.6.2015 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 1-ii
	42	  	2015 10 05 Client 1 DPZ Model Runs v10-6-15 v2.xlsx	  	10.6.2015 Client 1 Stress Runs Case 1-iii
	43	  	DPZ 2015-1 Client 3.xlsm	  	Client 3 Custom
	44	  	2015.10.07_Client 4_DPZ_Model_Scenario_BE-thruPRIN_Case_Annual_2012 LF.xlsm	  	BE-thruPRIN_Case_Annual_2012 LF
	45	  	 2015.10.07_Client

5_DPZ_Model_Scenario_Zero_Growth_Case_NoRefi.xlsm
	  	Zero_Growth_Case_NoRefi
	46	  	 2015.10.07_Client

5_DPZ_Model_Scenario_Breakeven_Decline_Case_NoRefi.xlsm
	  	Breakeven_Decline_Case_NoRefi
	47	  	 2015.10.07_Client

5_DPZ_Model_Scenario_3.5%_Growth_Case_No Refi.xlsm
	  	3.5%_Growth_Case_No Refi
	48	  	 2015.10.07_Client

5_DPZ_Model_Scenario_(5.0)%_Decline_Case_NoRefi.xlsm
	  	(5.0)%_Decline_Case_NoRefi
	49	  	 2015.10.07_Client

5_DPZ_Model_Scenario_Zero_Growth_Case_A2&A2i Refi.xlsm
	  	Zero_Growth_Case_A2&A2i Refi
	50	  	 2015.10.07_Client

5_DPZ_Model_Scenario_Breakeven_Decline_Case_A2&A2i Refi.xlsm
	  	Breakeven_Decline_Case_A2&A2i Refi
	51	  	 2015.10.07_Client

5_DPZ_Model_Scenario_3.5%_Growth_Case_A2&A2i Refi v2.xlsm
	  	3.5%_Growth_Case_A2&A2i Refi v2
	52	  	 2015.10.07_Client

5_DPZ_Model_Scenario_(5.0)%_Decline_Case_A2&A2i Refi.xlsm
	  	(5.0)%_Decline_Case_A2&A2i Refi

  

	 	2.	Responses to questions from prospective investors: 

 None. 

 

	B.	Investor Presentation 








 Exhibit 1 

Management Presentation, Series 2015-1 Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes (the “Investor Presentation”) 







 Exhibit 2-A 

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Opinions 
  

	1.	Each of Domino’s, Intermediate Holdco, SPV Canadian Holdco, the International Franchisor, the IP Holder, the SPV Guarantor, the Master Issuer, the Domestic Distributor, the Domestic Distribution Equipment Holder,
the Domestic Distribution Real Estate Holder (the “Delaware Opinion Parties” and each, a “Delaware Opinion Party”) is duly incorporated or formed, as applicable, and is validly existing and in good standing under
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) or the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the “DLLCA”), as applicable. 


 

	2.	Each Delaware Opinion Party has the corporate or limited liability company, as applicable, power and authority to execute and deliver each of the Transaction Documents (other than the Limited Liability Company
Agreements of the Securitization Entities (the “Delaware LLC Agreements”) and the Limited Liability Company Agreement of the International Franchisor (together with the Delaware LLC Agreements, the “LLC
Agreements”)) to which such Delaware Opinion Party is a party and to consummate the transactions contemplated thereby, including, if such Delaware Opinion Party is a Co-Issuer, the issuance and sale of the Notes, under the DGCL or the
DLLCA, as applicable, including, if such Delaware Opinion Party is a Co-Issuer, the issuance and sale of the Notes, and each holder of the membership interest in a Securitization Entity under the applicable LLC Agreement (each, a “Delaware
Member”) has the limited liability company power and authority to execute, deliver and perform all of its obligations under each of the Delaware LLC Agreement to which such Delaware Member is a party under the DLLCA. 


 

	3.	Each of the Transaction Documents to which a Delaware Opinion Party is a party has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by all requisite corporate or limited liability company, as applicable, action on the part
of such Delaware Opinion Party under the DGCL or the DLLC, as applicable. 

  

	4.	(A) Each of the New York Transaction Agreements to which a Delaware Opinion Party, and DPL, the Canadian Distributor and the Canadian Manufacturer (collectively, the “Non-Delaware Opinion Parties” and
each, a “Non-Delaware Opinion Party” and, together with the Delaware Opinion Parties, the “Opinion Parties”) is a party constitutes the valid and binding obligation of such Opinion Party, enforceable against such
Opinion Party in accordance with its terms under the laws of the State of New York. (B) Each of the Delaware Transaction Agreements to which an Opinion Party or DNAF is a party constitutes the valid and binding obligation of such Opinion Party
or DNAF, enforceable against such Opinion Party or DNAF in accordance with its terms under the laws of the State of Delaware. 

  

	5.	Each Delaware LLC Agreement of each Delaware LLC Opinion Party constitutes a valid and binding agreement of each Delaware Member party thereto, enforceable against such Delaware Member in accordance with its terms under
the DLLCA. 









	6.	Neither the execution and delivery by each Delaware Opinion Party of the Transaction Agreements to which such Delaware Opinion Party is a party nor the consummation by such Delaware Opinion Party of the transactions
contemplated by each of the Transaction Agreements to which such Delaware Opinion Party is a party, including, if such Delaware Opinion Party is a Co-Issuer, the issuance and sale of the Offered Notes and the Class A-1 Senior Notes (together,
the “Notes”), (i) conflicts with the organizational documents of such Delaware Opinion Party or (ii) violates any law, rule or regulation of the State of New York or the United States of America or the DGCL or the DLLCA,
as applicable. 

  

	7.	Neither the execution and delivery by each Opinion Party of the Transaction Agreements to which such Opinion Party is a party nor the enforceability of each of the Transaction Agreements to which such Opinion Party is a
party against such Opinion Party, requires the consent, approval, licensing or authorization of, or any filing, recording or registration with, any governmental authority under any law, rule or regulation of the State of New York or the United
States of America, the DGCL or the DLLCA, as applicable, or except for those consents, approvals, licenses and authorizations already obtained and those filings, recordings and registrations already made. 


 

	8.	Each Opinion Party is not and, solely after giving effect to the offering and sale of the Notes and the application of the proceeds thereof as described in the Final Offering Memorandum, will not be an “investment
company” as such term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. 

  

	9.	All conditions precedent to the issuance of the Notes set forth in the Indenture have been satisfied and the Series 2015-1 Supplement is authorized or permitted pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Indenture.


  

	10.	The Notes have been duly authorized by all requisite limited liability company or corporate action, as applicable, on the part of the Co-Issuers and duly executed by the Co-Issuers under the DLLCA or DGCL, as
applicable, and when duly authenticated by the Trustee and issued and delivered by the Co-Issuers against payment therefor in accordance with the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, the Variable Funding Note Purchase Agreement and the Indenture,
the Notes will constitute valid and binding obligations of the Co-Issuers, entitled to the benefits of the Indenture and enforceable against the Co-Issuers in accordance with their terms under the laws of the State of New York. 


 

	11.	The offer, sale and delivery of the Offered Notes to the Initial Purchasers in the manner contemplated by the Note Purchase Agreement and the Final Offering Memorandum and the initial resale of the Notes by the Initial
Purchasers in the manner contemplated in the Final Offering Memorandum and the Note Purchase Agreement, do not require registration under the Securities Act or qualification of the Indenture under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. 


 

	12.	The offer, sale and delivery of the Series 2015-1 Class A-1 Notes to the Lender Parties in the manner contemplated by the Variable Funding Note Purchase Agreement does not require registration under the Securities
Act or qualification of the Indenture under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. 









	13.	The Notes and the Company Order conform to the requirements of the Base Indenture and the Series 2015-1 Supplement, and the Notes are permitted to be authenticated by the Trustee pursuant to the terms of the Base
Indenture and the Series 2015-1 Supplement. 

  

	14.	In a properly presented and argued case by a party with standing to seek dismissal of a voluntary case based on an Opinion Party’s failure to comply with those provisions of its organizational document requiring
the unanimous written consent of its Directors or Managers, as applicable, to commence a voluntary case, as a legal matter, and based upon existing case law, (i) the provisions of each Opinion Party’s organizational document requiring the
unanimous written consent of such Opinion Party’s Directors or Managers, as applicable, to commence a voluntary case constitute the valid and binding obligation of each Opinion Party or Member of such Opinion Party, as applicable, enforceable
against such Opinion Party or Member in accordance with their terms under the laws of the State of Delaware, and (ii) a bankruptcy court, in determining each Opinion Party’s authority to commence a voluntary case, would rule that
compliance with such provisions of such Opinion Party’s organizational document is necessary to commence a voluntary case. 

  

	15.	Under the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect on the date hereof in the State of New York (the “New York UCC”), the provisions of the Indenture are effect to create a security interest in each
Co-Issuer’s rights in that portion of the Indenture Collateral (as defined in the Indenture) in which a security interest may be created under Article 9 of the New York UCC (the “UCC Collateral”) in favor of the Trustee to
secure the Obligations (as defined in the Indenture). 

  

	16.	Under the New York UCC, the provisions of the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement are effective to create a security interest in each Guarantor’s rights in the UCC Collateral in favor of the Trustee to secure the
Obligations (as defined in the Indenture). 

  

	17.	Each of the Domino’s EQ LLC Financing Statement and the Domino’s RE LLC were in appropriate form for filing when filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the “Delaware
Filing Office”). 

  

	18.	Under the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect on the date hereof in the State of Delaware (the “Delaware UCC”), the security interest of the Trustee was perfected in each of the Co-Issuers’ and
the Guarantors’ (together, the “Grantors” and each, a “Grantor”) rights in that portion of the UCC Collateral in which a security interest can be perfected under the Delaware UCC by the filing of a financing statement
in the Delaware Filing Office upon the later of the attachment of the security interest and the filing of the Delaware Financing Statement identifying such Grantor as debtor in the Delaware Filing Office. 


 

	19.	Under the New York UCC, the provisions of the Base Indenture are effective to perfect the security interest of the Trustee in each Co-Issuers’ rights in the respective Indenture Trust Account. 









	20.	Under the New York UCC, the provisions of the Control Agreement are effective to perfect the security interest of the Trustee in each Grantor’s rights in the respective Collateral Account. 


 

	21.	Under the New York UCC, assuming that neither the Trustee nor any Beneficiary has notice of adverse claims with respect to the possessory certificates identified in an exhibit to the opinion (the “Possessory
Certificates”) then, upon the delivery of such Possessory Certificates to the Trustee, indorsed by an effective indorsement, either in blank or to the Trustee, the security interest of the Trustee in each Grantor’s rights in the
Possessory Certificates pledged by such Grantor was perfected and the Trustee acquired each Grantor’s rights in the Possessory Certificates pledged by such Grantor free of any adverse claims under Section 8-303 of the New York UCC.


  

	22.	To the extent that the provisions of the Lanham (Trademark) Act (15 U.S.C. 1051, et seq.) (the “Lanham Act”) pertaining to the assignment of trademarks preempt the provisions of the applicable UCC
requiring the filing of a financing statement for the perfection of a security interest in trademarks, the recordation of the (i) Supplemental Trademark Security Agreement in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”)
against the U.S. registered trademarks and trademark applications identified by the trademark and trademark application numbers set forth on Schedule 1 to the Supplemental Trademark Security Agreement (the “Supplemental Trademarks”)
within three (3) months after its date perfected the Trustee’s security interest in the IP Holder’s right, title and interest in such Supplemental Trademarks, and (ii) Trademark Security Agreement in the PTO against the U.S.
registered trademarks and trademark applications identified by the trademark and trademark application numbers set forth on Schedule 1 to the Trademark Security Agreement (the “Existing Trademarks” and, together with the Supplemental
Trademarks, the “Trademarks”) within three (3) months after its date perfected the Trustee’s security interest in the IP Holder’s right, title and interest in such Existing Trademarks. 


 

	23.	To the extent that the provisions of the United States Patent Act (35 U.S.C. §1, et seq.) (the “Patent Act”) pertaining to the assignment, grant or conveyance of patents preempt the provisions of
the applicable UCC requiring the filing of a financing statement for the perfection of a security interest in patents, the recordation of the (i) Supplemental Patent Security Agreement in the PTO against the U.S. patents and patent applications
identified by the patent and patent application numbers set forth on Schedule 1 to the Supplemental Patent Security Agreement (the “Supplemental Patents”) within three (3) months from its date perfected the Trustee’s
security interest in the IP Holder’s right, title and interest in such Supplemental Patents, and (ii) Patent Security Agreement in the PTO against the U.S. patents and patent applications identified by the patent and patent application
numbers set forth on Schedule 1 to the Patent Security Agreement (the “Existing Patents” and, together with the Supplemental Patents, the “Patents”) within three (3) months from its date perfected the
Trustee’s security interest in the IP Holder’s right, title and interest in such Existing Patents. 









	24.	An opinion covering tax matters, to the effect that (a) to the extent treated as issued and outstanding for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Offered Notes will be treated as debt for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, (b) the issuance of the Offered Notes will not affect adversely the U.S. federal income tax characterization of any Series 2012-1 Notes that were (based upon an opinion of counsel) treated as debt at the time of their issuance,
(c) each Non-Corporate U.S. Securitization Entity will be classified as an entity the existence of which is disregarded, rather than as a corporation, for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and (d) none of the Non-Corporate U.S.
Securitization Entities will be classified as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. Subject to the agreements, qualifications, assumptions, and Co-Issuers’ determinations referred to in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and
the Final Offering Memorandum, the discussion set forth in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Final Offering Memorandum under the heading “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” constitutes, in all material respects,
a fair and accurate summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Series 2015 Senior Notes under current U.S. federal income tax law. 


 

	25.	An opinion that all conditions precedent to the issuance of the Notes have been satisfied and that the Series 2015-1 Supplement is authorized or permitted pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Indenture.


  

	26.	Each Contribution and Sale Agreement purported to contribute or sell the applicable UCC Collateral. If in each case the transfer was characterized as a lien, the provisions of each Contribution and Sale Agreement were
effective under the UCC to create a security interest in each Grantor’s rights in the applicable UCC Collateral in favor of the related secured party in each case to secure a loan in the aggregate value of the Contributed Assets (as defined in
such Contribution and Sale Agreement). 

  

	27.	An opinion to the effect that in the event of the bankruptcy of any contributor under a Contribution and Sale Agreement (each, a “Contributor”) (a) section 362(a) of title 11 of the United States
Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) would not apply to stay payment to the applicable contributee (or its assigns) under the applicable Contribution and Sale Agreement of amounts collected in connection with the assets contributed under
such Contribution and Sale Agreement and proceeds of sale thereof and (b) the assets contributed under such Contribution and Agreement and proceeds of sale or collections in connection therewith would not constitute property of the applicable
Contributor’s bankruptcy estate under section 541(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

  

	28.	An opinion to the effect that in a proceeding under the bankruptcy code in which any one or more of the Non-Securitization Entities were debtors, a bankruptcy court would not substantively consolidate the assets and
liabilities of any of the Securitization Entities with the assets and liabilities of any of those debtors in a manner prejudicial to the holders of the Notes. 

  

	29.	 A negative assurance letter to the effect that (A) no facts have come to the attention of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP that
have caused it to believe that the Pricing Disclosure Package, as of the Applicable Time, and the Final Offering 










	 	
Memorandum, as of its date and as of the Closing Date, did not and do not contain an untrue statement of material fact or omitted or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading (except that in each case no view will be expressed as to the financial statements, schedules and other financial information, or legends under the
notices to residents of foreign countries or states other than the State of New York in the introductory section of the Preliminary Offering Memorandum or the Offering Memorandum insofar as they relate to foreign law or the law of any state other
than the State of New York), (B) the statements in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Final Offering Memorandum under the captions “Description of the Servicer and the Servicing Agreement”, “Description of the
Manager and the Management Agreement”, “Description of the Back-Up Manager and the Back-Up Management Agreement”, “Description of the Offered Notes”, “Description of the Base Indenture and the
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement”, “Description of the Distribution and Contribution Agreements”, “Description of the Securitization Entities and the Securitization Entities’ Charter Documents”,
“Description of the IP License Agreements” and “Description of the Product Purchase Agreements” insofar as such statements purport to summarize certain provisions of the documents referred to therein, fairly
summarize such provisions in all material respects, and (C) the statements in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Offering Memorandum under the caption “Certain ERISA and Related Considerations” insofar as they purport
to describe the provisions of the laws and regulations referred to therein, are true and correct in all material respects. 








 Exhibit 2-B 

In-House Counsel Opinions 
  

	1.	Since April 18, 2007, the Domestic Franchisor has prepared and maintained Franchise Disclosure Documents (formerly known as Uniform Franchise Offering Circular) as necessary for the offer and sale of Domino’s
franchises in the United States (the “FDDs”). 

  

	2.	The FDDs complied or comply in all material respects with the Franchise Disclosure Document disclosure requirements of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and applicable state franchise and business opportunity laws.


  

	3.	The Domestic Franchisor has registered or filed the FDDs in all franchise registration/filings states in which the Domestic Franchisor has offered or sold Domino’s franchises except for those states in which the
Domestic Franchisor was exempt from registration or filing. 

  

	4.	Since April 18, 2007, the Domestic Franchisor, as required for its franchise offer and sales activities, had or has had franchise registrations/filings, in effect, or has been exempt from franchise
registration/filings, including exempt filings, at all times in which the Domestic Franchisor has offered or sold Domino’s franchises in franchise registration/filing states. 


 

	5.	Since April 18, 2007, the Domestic Franchisor has made all necessary filings, including exemption filings, under state business opportunity laws regulating the offer and sale of Domino’s franchises.


  

	6.	The forms of Standard Franchise Agreement, Non-Traditional Store Franchise Agreement, Transitional Store Franchise Agreement, Development Agreement, optimization agreement and License Agreement and other form agreements
attached as exhibits to the FDDs were the forms of such agreements signed by the franchisees who had received the FDDs to which they were attached (including, as applicable, state-specific riders or addenda required by state franchise registration
authorities), except to the extent they were modified by negotiated changes. These forms comply in all material respects with applicable state and federal laws and regulations. 


 

	7.	Since April 18, 2007, the Domestic Franchisor, has complied in all material respects with the filing requirements for advertising and other franchisee solicitation materials under applicable state franchise laws
and all such materials have in all material respects complied in substance and form with all standards and conditions prescribed by such applicable laws. 

  

	8.	Since April 18, 2007, the Domestic Franchisor, as required for its franchise offer and sales activities, has complied in all material respects with the filing requirements for franchise salespersons, franchise
sales agents, and franchise brokers under applicable state franchise laws. 









	9.	To the knowledge of the undersigned, the Domestic Franchisor has not sold any Domino’s franchises to any franchisees at a time when their FDDs were not then in effect. 


 

	10.	To the knowledge of the undersigned, the Domestic Franchisor has not sold any Domino’s franchises to any franchisees at a time when its required state franchise registrations or business opportunity filings (or
exemptions from registration or filing) referred to in paragraphs 3,4 and 5 were not then in effect. 

  

	11.	To his knowledge, there is no action, proceeding or investigation pending or threatened before any court, administrative agency or other Governmental Authority that (i) challenges the validity or enforceability of,
or seeks to enjoin the performance of, the Related Documents or (ii) would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business of the Domino’s Entities taken as a whole. 


 

	12.	To his knowledge, the execution and delivery by each of Holdco and its Subsidiaries which are organized under the laws of a State of the United States (each a “Domestic Company”) of each Related
Document to which it is a party and the performance of its obligations thereunder will not (i) violate any order, writ, injunction, judgment or decree of any United States federal or state court, Governmental Authority or agency applicable to
such Domestic Company or its property or (ii) breach or result in a default or the creation or imposition of any Lien upon any assets of such Domestic Company under the terms of any agreement or instrument which is material to the business of
Holdco and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than as contemplated by the Related Documents. 








 Exhibit 2-C 

DLA Piper Opinion and Negative Assurance Letter 
  

	1.	The statements made in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Final Offering Memorandum under the caption “Description of The Franchise Arrangements,” insofar as they purport to constitute
summaries of certain terms of the Current Form Franchise Documents, constitute accurate summaries of the terms of the Current Form Franchise Documents in all material respects. The statements in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Final
Offering Memorandum under the caption “Certain Legal Aspects of the Franchise Arrangements,” insofar as they describe United States federal and state laws relating to franchising and business opportunities, and insofar as they describe
similar laws and regulations relating to franchising internationally at the local and national level in certain countries, have been reviewed by us and constitute accurate summaries of the matters described therein in all material respects. No facts
have come to our attention that have led us to believe that the statements in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Final Offering Memorandum under the caption “Description of The Franchise Arrangements,” or the statements in
the Final Offering Memorandum under the caption “Certain Legal Aspects of the Franchise Arrangements,” when issued contained, or on the date of the opinion letter contain, any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted or omit
to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. However, except for our review as described in this paragraph, we did not independently
investigate or verify, and express no opinion with respect to, the factual statements contained in the Preliminary Offering Memorandum and the Final Offering Memorandum. 


 

	2.	No consent, approval, or authorization of or designation, declaration or filing with any federal or state authority that regulates franchising in the U.S. is required in connection with the issuance of the Offered Notes
on the Closing Date. 

 Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, P.L.C. Opinions 

 

	1.	Domino’s National Advertising Fund Inc., a Michigan limited liability company (“DNAF”) (i) was validly incorporated in the State of Michigan and, based on the National Michigan Good Standing
Certificate, is validly in existence, and is in good standing under the laws of the State of Michigan and (ii) had at the relevant time, the corporate power and authority to execute and deliver, and to perform its obligations under, the
Existing Transaction Documents to which it is a party. Each of Domino’s Pizza LLC (“DPL”) and Progressive Food Solutions LLC (“PFS”) (i) was validly organized as a limited liability company in the State of
Michigan and (ii) has the limited liability company power and authority to execute and deliver, and to perform its obligations under, the Transaction Documents to which it is a party. 


 

	2.	 Each of DPL and PFS (i) was validly organized as a limited liability company in the State of Michigan and, based on the DPL Michigan Good
Standing Certificate (in the case of DPL) and the PFS Michigan Good Standing Certificate (in the case of PFS) and is validly 










	 	
in existence, and is in good standing under the laws of the State of Michigan, (ii) had, at the relevant time, the limited liability company power and authority to execute and deliver, and
to perform its obligations under, the Existing Transaction Documents to which it is a party, and (iii) in the case of DPL, has the limited liability company power and authority to execute and deliver, and to perform its obligations under, the
2015 Transaction Documents to which it is a party. 

  

	3.	Each of DPL, PFS and DNAF has duly authorized the execution and delivery of each of the Transaction Documents to which it is a party. Each of DPL, PFS and DNAF has duly executed each of the Transaction Documents to
which it is a party. DPL has duly authorized the execution and delivery of each of the 2015 Transaction Documents to which it is a party and has duly executed each of the 2015 Transaction Documents to which it is a party. Assuming (x) that the
Domestic Distributor had the power and authority to execute and deliver, and to perform its obligation under the Company-Owned Stores Requirements Agreement, and (y) that the Company-Owned Stores Requirements Agreement was duly authorized,
executed and delivered by the Domestic Distributor, the Company-Owned Stores Requirements Agreement constitutes the valid and legally binding obligation of each of the parties thereto enforceable in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer or conveyance and other similar laws of general application affecting the rights and remedies of creditors and secured parties and general principles of equity. 


 

	3.	Neither the execution, delivery or performance by DPL, PFS or DNAF of the Existing Transaction Documents (including, without limitation, the granting of Liens pursuant to the Existing Transaction Documents) to which it
is a party, nor compliance by DPL, PFS or DNAF with the terms and provisions thereof, (i) contravened any provision of any Michigan statute, rule or regulation generally applicable to corporations incorporated (or, in the case of DPL and PFS,
applicable to a limited liability company formed) and/or doing business in the State of Michigan, or (ii) violated any provision of the articles of incorporation, articles of organization, by-laws, or operating agreement (if any), of DPL, PFS
or DNAF, as the case may be. 

  

	4.	Neither the execution, delivery or performance by DPL of the 2015 Transaction Documents (including, without limitation, the granting of Liens pursuant to the 2015 Transaction Documents) to which it is a party, nor
compliance by DPL with the terms and provisions thereof, (i) contravened any provision of any Michigan statute, rule or regulation generally applicable to a limited liability company formed) and/or doing business in the State of Michigan, or
(ii) violated any provision of the articles of organization, by-laws, or operating agreement, of DPL. 

  

	5.	 Except as may have been, or may be, required in order to perfect, or to otherwise establish the priority of, the Liens created by the Transaction
Documents, to our actual knowledge (as to factual matters only), under Michigan statutory law, no order, consent, approval, license, authorization or validation of, or filing, recording or registration with, or exemption by, any governmental or
public body or authority, or any subdivision thereof, was or is required to authorize, or was or is required in connection with, (i) the execution, delivery and performance by DPL, PFS or DNAF of the Transaction











	 	
Documents to which DPL, PFS or DNAF is a party or (ii) the legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability against DPL, PFS or DNAF of any of the Transaction Documents to which DPL, PFS
or DNAF is a party. 

  

	6.	The financing statements attached to the opinion (the “Domino’s Pizza Financing Statements”) were in proper form for filing under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State
of Michigan on the date hereof (the “Michigan UCC”). Insofar as Article 9 of the Michigan UCC is applicable (without regard to conflict of laws principles), the secured party named in the Domino’s Financing Statements has a
perfected security interest in that portion of the assets of DPL that are the subject of such Domino’s Pizza Financing Statements and in which a security interest may be perfected by the filing of a financing statement with the Filing Office
under the Michigan UCC. 

  

	7.	The DPL Financing Statements were, at the relevant time, in proper form for filing under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date thereof. Insofar as Article 9 of the
Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date thereof was applicable (without regard to conflict of laws principles), upon the filing of such DPL Financing Statements with the Filing Office, the secured party named in the
Domino’s Financing Statements obtained a perfected security interest in that portion of the assets of DPL that are the subject of such DPL Financing Statements and in which a security interest could be perfected by the filing of a financing
statement with the Filing Office Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date thereof. Insofar as Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date hereof (the
“Michigan UCC”) is applicable (without regard to conflict of laws principles), by virtue of the filing of such DPL Financing Statements with the Filing Office, and the filing of the DPL Continuation Statements with the Filing
Office, the secured party named in the DPL Financing Statements has a perfected security interest in that portion of the assets of DPL that are the subject of such DPL Financing Statements and in which a security interest can be perfected by the
filing of a financing statement with the Filing Office under the Michigan UCC (said assets of DPL being the “DPL UCC Collateral”). 

  

	8.	The DPOFBV Financing Statements were, at the relevant time, in proper form for filing under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date thereof. Insofar as Article 9 of the
Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date thereof was applicable (without regard to conflict of laws principles), upon the filing of such DPOFBV Financing Statements with the Filing Office, the secured party named in
the DPOFBV Financing Statements obtained a perfected security interest in that portion of the assets of DPOFBV that are the subject of such DPOFBV Financing Statements and in which a security interest could be perfected by the filing of a financing
statement with the Filing Office Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date thereof. Insofar as Article 9 of Michigan UCC is applicable (without regard to conflict of laws principles), by virtue of the
filing of such DPOFBV Financing Statements with the Filing Office, the secured party named in the DPOFBV Financing Statements has a perfected security interest in that portion of the assets of DPOFBV that are the subject of such DPOFBV Financing
Statements and in which a security interest can be perfected by the filing of a financing statement with the Filing Office under the Michigan UCC (said assets of DPOFBV being the “DPOFBV UCC Collateral”). 









	9.	The DOIPHCV Financing Statements were in proper form for filing under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date thereof. Insofar as Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial
Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date thereof was applicable (without regard to conflict of laws principles), upon the filing of such DOIPHCV Financing Statements with the Filing Office, the secured party named in the DOIPHCV
Financing Statements obtained a perfected security interest in that portion of the assets of DOIPHCV that are the subject of such DOIPHCV Financing Statements and in which a security interest could be perfected by the filing of a financing statement
with the Filing Office Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of Michigan on the date thereof. Insofar as Article 9 of the Michigan UCC is applicable (without regard to conflict of laws principles), by virtue of the
filing of such DOIPHCV Financing Statements with the Filing Office, the secured party named in the DOIPHCV Financing Statements has a perfected security interest in that portion of the assets of DOIPHCV that are the subject of such DOIPHCV Financing
Statements and in which a security interest can be perfected by the filing of a financing statement with the Filing Office under the Michigan UCC (said assets of DOIPHCV being the “DOIPHCV UCC Collateral”). 


 

	10.	Insofar as Article 9 of the Michigan UCC is applicable (without regard to conflict of laws principles), the secured party named in the Domino’s Financing Statements obtained a perfected security interest in that
portion of the assets of DPL that were the subject of such Domino’s Pizza Financing Statements and in which a security interest may be perfected by the filing of a financing statement with the Michigan Secretary of State Uniform Commercial Code
Section (the “Filing Office”) under the Michigan UCC. 

  

	11.	Insofar as Article 9 of the Michigan UCC is applicable (without regard to conflicts of laws principles), no action with respect to (a) the recording, filing, re-recording and re-filing of the Transaction Document
and any other requisite documents with the Filing Office, and (b) the execution and filing with the Filing Office of any financing statement or continuation statement naming DPL as debtor, is currently necessary in the State of Michigan.









 Exhibit 2-D 

Stikeman Elliot LLP Opinions 
  

	1.	No registration in any public office provided for under the laws of Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia (the “Jurisdictions”) is necessary in the Jurisdictions as of the date hereof to maintain the
perfection of the security interests created by the Canadian Distributor pursuant to the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement. 

  

	2.	Except for the registration of additional financing statements or financing change statements required by reason of a change in the name of (or the adoption of an additional form of name of) the Canadian Distributor, a
transfer by the Canadian Distributor of all or any part of the Collateral (as defined in the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement), the removal of the Collateral (as defined in the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement) from the Jurisdictions or a change
in the place of the chief executive office of the Canadian Distributor no registrations pursuant to the Personal Property Security Act (the “PPSA’s”) of the Jurisdictions is required under such PPSA’s of the Jurisdictions
as in effect on the date hereof, in order to maintain the effectiveness of such registrations until discharged. 

 Stewart McKelvey
Opinions 
  

	1.	Each of Domino’s Pizza NS Co. and the Canadian Distributor (collectively, the “Nova Scotia Companies”) is a subsisting unlimited company under the laws of the Province of Nova Scotia (the
“Province”). 

  

	2.	Each of the Nova Scotia Companies has the corporate power and capacity to execute and deliver the Note Purchase Agreement and the Series 2015-1 Supplement, as applicable, and to exercise its rights and perform its
obligations thereunder. 

  

	3.	Each of the Nova Scotia Companies has taken all necessary corporate action to authorize the execution and delivery of the Note Purchase Agreement and the Series 2015-1 Supplement, as applicable, and the exercise of its
rights and the performance of its obligations thereunder. 

  

	4.	Each of the Note Purchase Agreement and the Series 2015-1 Supplement, to which either of the Nova Scotia Companies is a party has been duly executed and delivered by it. 


 

	5.	The execution and delivery by each of the Nova Scotia Companies and SPV Canadian Holdco (collectively, the “Opinion Parties”) of the Note Purchase Agreement and the Series 2015-1 Supplement, as
applicable and the exercise of its rights and the performance of its obligations thereunder do not violate, result in a breach of, or constitute a default under (a) in the case of either the Nova Scotia Companies the memorandum of association
and articles of such of the Nova Scotia Companies or (b) any statute or regulation of the Province or any federal statute or regulation of Canada applicable therein which is applicable to the Opinion Parties, or the Collateral.










	6.	The execution and delivery by each of the Opinion Parties of the Note Purchase Agreement and the Series 2015-1 Supplement and the performance of its obligations thereunder do not: 


 

	 	a.	require any recording, filing or registration with, consent, authorization or approval of, or notice or other action to, with or by, any governmental authority in the Province other than such registrations, if any, as
may be necessary to perfect security interests created thereby under the PPSA, as described in paragraph 7 below; or 

  

	 	b.	violate, result in a breach of, or constitute a default under any statute or regulation of the Province or any federal statute or regulation of Canada applicable therein which is applicable to such of the Opinion
Parties or the Collateral. 

  

	7.	Under the laws of the Province, no recording, filing or registration is necessary in order to create, preserve, perfect and protect the security interest in the personal property of Canadian Distributor and SPV Canadian
Holdco made subject to a security interest under any of the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement and the Base Indenture (together, the “Security Documents”) in favour of Canadian Distributor or the Trustee, as applicable, other than
the registration of financing statements under the PPSA, which registrations have been made. No renewal or amendment of such registrations is required under the laws of Province. 


 

	8.	No transaction contemplated by the Note Purchase Agreement and the Series 2015-1 Supplement requires compliance with any bulk sales legislation in the Province. 


 

	9.	Each of the Security Documents creates in favour of the Trustee a valid security interest in all right, title and interest of the applicable Opinion Party in, to and under the personal property of Canadian Distributor
and SPV Canadian Holdco made subject to a security interest under any of the Security Documents in which such Opinion Party has granted a security interest pursuant to the applicable Security Document if and to the extent that the laws of the
Province apply thereto, with no further formality being required under such laws. 

  

	10.	In the event that any of the Note Purchase Agreement or the Series 2015-1 Supplement is sought to be enforced in any action or proceeding in the Province in accordance with the stated choice of law, namely the laws of
the State of Delaware or the State of New York (the “Chosen Law”), the courts of the Province (i) would recognize the choice of law if it was not made with a view to avoiding the consequences of the laws of any other
jurisdiction and that choice is not otherwise contrary to public policy, as such term is understood under the laws of the Province, and (ii) would, subject to clause (i) above, apply the applicable Chosen Law upon appropriate evidence as
to such laws being adduced, provided that none of the provisions of the Note Purchase Agreement or the Series 2015-1 Supplement or of the applicable Chosen Law are contrary to public policy, as such term is understood under the laws of the Province.
A court in the Province has, however, an inherent power to decline to hear such action or proceeding if it is contrary to public policy, as such term is understood under the laws of the Province for such court to do so, or if that court is not the
proper forum to hear such action or proceeding, or if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere. 









	11.	The laws of the Province permit an action to be brought in a court in the Province on any final and conclusive judgment in personam under the internal laws of the State of Delaware or the State of New York (the
“Foreign Court”) which is not impeachable as void or voidable under the internal laws applied by such Foreign Court, for a sum certain if: 


(a) that judgment was not obtained by fraud or in a manner contrary to “natural justice” and the enforcement of that judgment would
not be contrary to “public policy” as such terms are applied by the courts of the Province; 
 (b) the Foreign Court did not act
either: (i) without jurisdiction under the conflict of laws rules of the laws of the Province; or (ii) without authority, under the laws in force in the jurisdiction of such Foreign Court, to adjudicate concerning the cause of action or
subject matter that resulted in the judgment or concerning the person of that judgment debtor; 
 (c) the judgment debtor was duly served
with the process of the Foreign Court or appeared to defend such process, and, for the purposes of service of process, it is not sufficient that the judgment debtor had agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the Foreign Court; 

(d) the judgment is not contrary to the final and conclusive judgment of another jurisdiction; 

(e) the enforcement of that judgment does not constitute, directly or indirectly, the enforcement of foreign revenue or penal laws; 

(f) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to any order made by the Attorney-General of Canada under the Foreign
Extraterritorial Measures Act (Canada) or the Competition Tribunal under the Competition Act (Canada) in respect of certain judgments, laws, and directives having effects on competition in Canada; and 

(g) the action to enforce that judgment is taken within six years of the date of that foreign judgment as stipulated in the Limitations of
Actions Act (Nova Scotia). 
  

	12.	Attached to the opinion is a report showing the results of the searches conducted in the public offices and registries in the Province under the statutes specified therein against the current names of the Opinion
Parties listed in such schedule and current as of the respective currency dates indicated therein (which we note may not be the date of the opinion). Such statutes are the only statutes of the Province and the only federal statutes of Canada
applicable therein, where transfers of, or security interests in, assets similar in nature to the personal property of Canadian Distributor and SPV Canadian Holdco made subject to a security interest under any of the Security Documents would
ordinarily or customarily be the subject of a filing, registration or recording in order to create, preserve, perfect and protect such transfers or security interests. The only filings, registrations or recordings against such names of the Opinion
Parties disclosed by such searches are set out in the schedule. 

  

	13.	An opinion to the effect that a court of competent jurisdiction in the Province having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy of the Transferee would not order or approval the substantive consolidation of the assets and
liabilities of the Canadian Distributor with the assets and liabilities of any of the Securitization Entities and the Non-Securitization Entities. 








 Thompson Dorman Sweatman LLP Opinions 

 

	1.	Registration of the security interest created by the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement has been made, as of the Initial Closing Date, in all public offices provided for under the laws of the Province of Manitoba or the
federal laws of Canada applicable therein where such registration is necessary to preserve, protect or perfect the security interests created by the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement and such registrations continue to be in effect.


  

	2.	No further or subsequent recording, filing, indexing, entering or registering of the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement will be necessary in the Province of Manitoba in order to continue the validity or perfection of
the security interest created under the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement in the personal property to which the PPSA applies in which the Canadian Distributor now has rights and in which the Canadian Distributor hereafter requires rights when these
rights are acquired by the Canadian Distributor until April 30, 2016. 

 Loyens Loeff Opinions 

 

	1.	Domino’s Pizza Overseas Franchising B.V. (the “Overseas Franchisor”) has been duly incorporated and is validly existing as a besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid (private
company with limited liability) under Dutch law. 

  

	2.	Domino’s Overseas IP Holder C.V. (the “Overseas IP Holder”) has been formed and is existing as a commanditaire vennootschap (limited partnership) under Dutch law. 


 

	3.	The Overseas Franchisor has the corporate power to execute and deliver the Overseas Franchisor Contribution Agreement, the Overseas IP Holder Contribution Agreement, the Overseas Franchisor Distribution Agreement and
the Overseas IP Holder Distribution Agreement (collectively, the “Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents”) (to the extent it is a party thereto) and to perform its obligations thereunder. 


 

	4.	The Overseas IP Holder, acting through Domino’s Overseas GP LLC (the “Overseas GP”), has the power to execute and deliver the Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents to which it is a party and to perform
its obligations thereunder. 

  

	5.	The Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action on the part of, and have been duly executed and delivered by, the Overseas Franchisor (to the extent it is a party thereto).










	6.	Provided that the Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action on the part of, and have been duly executed and delivered by the Overseas GP on behalf of the Overseas IP
Holder, the Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents have been duly executed and delivered by the Overseas IP Holder. 

  

	7.	The choice of the laws of the State of New York, United States of America, as the law governing the contractual rights and obligations contained in the Overseas Franchisor Contribution Agreement and the Overseas IP
Holder Contribution Agreement (together, the “Contribution Agreements”) is valid and binding under Dutch law. 

  

	8.	The contractual rights and obligations under the Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of the Overseas Franchisor and the Overseas IP Holder (to the extent it is a party
thereto), enforceable against the Overseas Franchisor and the Overseas IP Holder (to the extent it is a party thereto) in accordance with their terms. 

  

	9.	In case of any Dutch insolvency proceedings in the Netherlands with respect to the Overseas Franchisor, the Overseas IP Holder’s assets and liabilities should not be consolidate with those of the Overseas
Franchisor for purposes of such proceedings. 

  

	10.	In case of any Dutch insolvency proceedings in the Netherlands with respect to Company, each of the Overseas GP and Domino’s LP should be treated as separate entities from the Overseas Franchisor and the respective
assets and liabilities of each of the Overseas GP’s and Domino’s LP’s assets and liabilities should not be consolidated with those of the Overseas Franchisor for purposes of such proceedings. 


 

	11.	The execution and delivery by the Overseas IP Holder, acting through the Overseas GP, of the Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents and the Overseas Franchisor (to the extent it is a party thereto) of the Loyens Loeff Opinion
Documents and the performance by the Overseas IP Holder, acting through the Overseas GP, and the Overseas Franchisor to the extent it is a party thereto) of their respective obligations thereunder do not conflict with or result in a violation of the
Articles or partnership agreement of the Overseas IP Holder (as the case may be) or the provisions of any published law, rule or regulation of general application of the Netherlands. 


 

	12.	No approval, authorization or other action by, or filing with, any Dutch governmental, regulatory or supervisory authority or body, is required in connection with the execution by the Overseas IP Holder, acting through
the Overseas GP, and the Overseas Franchisor (to the extent it is a party thereto) of the Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents and the performance by the Overseas Franchisor (to the extent it is a party thereto) and the Overseas IP Holder, acting through
the Overseas GP, of their respective obligations thereunder, except that there may be reporting requirements to the Dutch Central Bank (De Nederlandsche Bank N.V.) on (inter alia) cross border payments pursuant to the Regulation of
4 February 2003 under the Act on Financial Foreign Relations 1994 (Wet financiële betrekkingen buitenland 1994). Failure to observe the filing, disclosure or notification requirements mentioned above, does not affect the legality,
validity or enforceability of the obligations of the Overseas Franchisor or the Overseas IP Holder or the Overseas IP Holder under the Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents. 









	13.	The Overseas Franchisor and the Overseas IP Holder are not entitled to any immunity from any legal proceedings in the Netherlands to enforce the Loyens Loeff Opinion Documents or any liability or obligation of the
Overseas Franchisor or the Overseas IP Holder arising thereunder. 

  

	14.	The consent to the jurisdiction of the state courts of the State of New York, United States of America as provided for in the Contribution Agreements is valid and binding upon the Overseas Franchisor and the Overseas IP
Holder under Dutch law, insofar as such laws are applicable, provided, however, that such consent does not preclude bringing claims for provisional measures before the provisional measures judge (voorzieningenrechter) of a competent court in
the Netherlands. 

  

	15.	The consent to the jurisdiction of the state courts of the State of Delaware, United States of America as provided for in the Overseas Franchisor Distribution Agreement and the Overseas IP Holder Distribution Agreement
(together, the “Distribution Agreements”) is valid and binding upon the Overseas Franchisor and the Overseas IP Holder under Dutch law, insofar as such laws are applicable, provided, however, that such consent does not preclude
bringing claims for provisional measures before the provisional measures judge (voorzieningenrechter) of a competent court in the Netherlands. 

  

	16.	In the absence of a an applicable treaty between the State of New York, United States of America and the Netherlands, a judgment rendered by a court of the State of New York, United States of America will not be
enforced by the courts in the Netherland. In order to obtain a judgment which is enforceable in the Netherlands the claim must be relitigated before a competent Dutch court. a judgment rendered by a court of the state of New York, United States of
America pursuant to the Contribution Agreements will, under current practice, be recognized by a Dutch court (i) if that judgment results from proceedings compatible with Dutch concepts of due process, (ii) if that judgment does not
contravene public policy (ordre public) of the Netherlands and (iii) the jurisdiction of the court of the State of New York, United States of America has been based on an internationally acceptable ground. 


 

	17.	In the absence of an applicable treaty between the State of Delaware, United States of America and the Netherlands, a judgment rendered by a court of the State of Delaware, United States of America will not be enforced
by the courts in the Netherlands. In order to obtain a judgment which is enforceable in the Netherlands the claim must be relitigated before a competent Dutch court. A judgment rendered by a court of the State of Delaware, United States of America
pursuant to the Distribution Agreements will, under current practice, be recognized by a Dutch court (i) if that judgment results from proceedings compatible with Dutch concepts of due process, (ii) if that judgment does not contravene public policy
(ordre public) of the Netherlands and (iii) the jurisdiction of the court of the State of Delaware, United States of America has been based on an internationally acceptable ground. 








 Exhibit 2-E 

Dentons US LLP Opinions 
  

	1.	Citibank, N.A., based upon a certificate of corporate existence issued by the Comptroller of the Currency, is validly existing as a banking association in good standing under the laws of the United States, and has the
requisite entity power and authority to execute and deliver each of (i) the Indenture, (ii) the Servicing Agreement, (iii) the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, (iv) the Management Agreement, (v) the Back-Up Management
Agreement and (vi) the Parent Company Support Agreement (collectively (i) through (vi), the “Dentons Agreements”) to which it is a party and to perform its obligation thereunder. 


 

	2.	Each of the Dentons Agreements has been duly authorized by all requisite action, executed and delivered by the Trustee. 

  

	3.	Each of the Dentons Agreements, assuming (unless opined to herein) the necessary entity power and authority, authorization, execution, authentication, payment and delivery of and by each party thereto, is a valid and
legally binding agreement under the laws of the State of New York, enforceable thereunder in accordance with its terms against the Trustee. 

  

	4.	With respect to the Trustee, the performance of its obligations under each of the Dentons Agreements and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby will not result in any breach of violation of its
articles of association or bylaws. 

  

	5.	With respect to the Trustee, to our knowledge, there is no legal action, suit, proceeding or investigation before any court, agency or other governmental body pending or threatened (by written communication to it of a
present intention to initiate such action, suit or proceeding) against it which, either in one instance or in the aggregate, draws into question the validity of, seeks to prevent the consummation of any of the transactions contemplated by or would
impair materially its ability to perform its obligations under the Dentons Agreements. 

  

	6.	With respect to the Trustee, the performance of its obligations under each of the Dentons Agreements to which it is a party and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby do not require any consent,
approval, authorization or order of, filing with or notice to any United States federal or State of New York, court agency or other governmental body under any United States federal or State of New York statute or regulation that is normally
applicable to transactions of the type contemplated by the Dentons Agreements, except such as may be required under the securities laws of any State of the United States or such as have been obtained, effected or given. 


 

	7.	With respect to the Trustee, the performance of its obligations under each of the Dentons Agreements and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby will not result in any breach or violation of any United
States federal or State of New York statute or regulation that is normally applicable to transactions of the type contemplated by the Dentons Agreements. 

  

	8.	The Notes have been duly authenticated and delivered by the Trustee in accordance with the Dentons Agreements. 








 Andrascik & Tita LLC Opinion 

 

	1.	The Servicing Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding agreement of the Servicer enforceable in accordance with its terms against the Servicer subject to (i) applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent
conveyance, receivership, conservatorship, reorganization, liquidation, moratorium, readjustment of debt or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors rights generally, as such laws would apply in the event of the insolvency,
receivership, conservatorship, liquidation or reorganization of, or other similar occurrence with respect to the Servicer, or in the event of any moratorium or similar occurrence affecting the Servicer and (ii) general principles of equity,
including, without limitation, principles of commercial reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding at law or in equity), and except that the enforcement of rights with respect to
indemnification, limitations and releases of liability and covenants not to sue, and contribution obligations and provisions (a) purporting to waive or limit rights to trial by jury, oral amendments to written agreements or rights of set off,
(b) relating to submission to jurisdiction, venue or service of process, or (c) relating to severability clauses, may be limited by applicable law or considerations of public policy. 


In-House Counsel of Servicer Opinions 
  

	1.	PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”) is a national banking association duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the United States of America, with full power and
authority under such laws to enter into and perform its obligations under the Servicing Agreement. 

  

	2.	The Servicing Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by PNC Bank. 

  

	3.	No consent, approval, authorization or order of any federal court, governmental agency or body is or was required in connection with the execution, delivery and performance by PNC Bank of the Servicing Agreement, except
for those consents, approvals, authorizations or orders that previously have been obtained. 

  

	4.	PNC Bank’s execution, delivery and fulfillment of the terms of the Servicing Agreement do not (a) conflict with or result in a violation of the Articles of Association or By-Laws of PNC Bank or
(b) violate applicable provisions of federal statutory laws or regulations known by me to be applicable to PNC Bank and to transactions of the type contemplated by the Servicing Agreement, the violation of which would have a material adverse
effect on the ability of PNC Bank to perform its obligations under the Servicing Agreement. 









	5.	PNC Bank’s execution, delivery and fulfillment of the terms of the Servicing Agreement do not result in a breach or violation of, or constitute a default or an event which, with the passing of time, the giving of
notice or both, would constitute a default under, or result in a right of acceleration of its obligations under, the terms of any indenture or other agreement or instrument known to me to which PNC Bank is a party or by which it is bound or any
order, judgment or decree of any federal or state court, administrative agency or governmental instrumentality known by me to be applicable to PNC Bank, the breach, violation, default or acceleration of which would have a material adverse effect on
the ability of PNC Bank to perform its obligations under the Servicing Agreement. 

  

	6.	To his knowledge, there are no actions, suits or proceedings against PNC Bank, pending before any federal or state court, governmental agency or arbitrator or overtly threatened in writing against PNC Bank which
challenge the enforceability or validity of the Servicing Agreement or any action taken or to be taken in connection with PNC Bank’s obligations contemplated therein or which, either individually or in the aggregate, is reasonably likely to
materially impair PNC Bank’s ability to perform under the terms of the Servicing Agreement. 

 Bringdown Letter to 2012 In-House
Counsel to Back-up Manager Opinions 
  

	1.	The Company has been duly incorporated and is validly existing as a corporation under the laws of the State of Maryland. 

  

	2.	The Company has the requisite corporate power and authority to execute and deliver the Agreement and to perform its obligations thereunder. 


 

	3.	The execution and delivery of the Agreement by the Company, and the performance by the Company of its obligations thereunder, have been authorized by all requisite corporate action of the Company, and constitute a
legal, valid and binding agreement of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms. 

  

	4.	Neither the execution and delivery of the Agreement by the Company nor the performance of the services contemplated thereby and compliance with the terms and conditions thereof by the Company will conflict with, result
in a breach or violation of, or constitute a default under, (a) the Articles of Incorporation, as restated, amended and supplemented, and By-Laws, as restated and amended, by the Company or (b) any applicable statute, rule or regulation to
which the Company is subject that would have a material adverse effect on (i) the ability of the Company to perform its obligations under the Agreement or (ii) the business, operations, assets, liabilities or financial condition of the
Company and its subsidiaries as a whole.