alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

HAKIMAH JABBOR, Case No. 1:18-cv-95

Plaintiff, Dlott, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.

vs.

JAMES GRAHAM, ORDER

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to amend erroneous pleadings 

pursuant to Rule 15 (Doc. 13). This case originated in 2018, when defendant removed to federal 

court plaintiffs’ state petition for a civil stalking protection order alleging that a federal judge “is 

avoiding having court, so I will not receive my property, he has consitantly [sic] use the courts to 

impede me serving him cease and desist orders.” (Doc. 1-3 at PAGEID 7). Because plaintiff’s 

initial petition was handwritten, her name was docketed as “Hakimah Jabbor” rather than 

“Hakimah Jabbar,” her correctly spelled legal name. Although she filed three motions during the 

pendency of this case, she did not address the spelling or misspelling of her name. (Docs. 5, 6, 

and 7). This case was dismissed on August 17, 2018. (Doc. 10). The dismissal was not 

appealed.

On July 29, 2024,―almost six years after the case was closed―Jabbar filed the instant 

motion to amend erroneous pleadings pursuant to Rule 15. (Doc. 13). Jabbar is no stranger to 

federal litigation. See, e.g., Case Nos. 2:17-cr-158, 1:20-cv-245, 2:20-cv-775, 2:20-cv-948, and 

2:20-cv-6406. She filed an identical motion to amend erroneous pleadings pursuant to Rule 15

in Deandre Forrest v. United States of America, No. 2:17-cr-158. That motion also sought to 

correct the spelling of her last name from “Jabbor” to “Jabbar.” The District Judge in that case 

Case: 1:18-cv-00095-SJD-KLL Doc #: 14 Filed: 09/27/24 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 61
2 

denied the motion as moot. (Doc. 225 in Case No. 2:17-cr-158). Other courts have similarly 

declined to change a party’s name after a case has closed. See, e.g., Johnson v. Thompson, No. 

3:21-cv-414, 2024 WL 3251729, at *2 (W.D. Ky. June 21, 2024) (declining “to change this 

closed case’s caption” “because there is no need to do so.” “A contrary rule would require the 

captions of long inactive, closed cases (like this one) to be updated anytime a party’s legal name 

is changed. . . . Such a rule would be impractical and serve no meaningful purpose.”). 

This Court agrees. Changing the spelling of Jabbar’s name in the case caption six years 

after the case closed is unnecessary and impractical. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 13) is 

DENIED as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ____________________ ____________________________ 

 Karen L. Litkovitz 

 United States Magistrate Judge

9/27/2024

Case: 1:18-cv-00095-SJD-KLL Doc #: 14 Filed: 09/27/24 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 62
Exhibit 24

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned,being directors and/or officers of General Electric Capital Services, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby constitutes andappoints Dennis D. Dammerman, James A. Parke, Joan C. Amble and Brian T.McAnaney and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, withfull power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, placeand stead in any and all capacities, to sign one or more Annual Reports for theCorporation's fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, on Form 10-K under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or such other form as suchattorney-in-fact may deem necessary or desirable, any amendments thereto, andall additional amendments thereto in such form as they or any one of them mayapprove, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other documents inconnection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting untosaid attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority todo and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be doneto the end that such Annual Report or Annual Reports shall comply with theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the applicable Rules andRegulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted or issued pursuantthereto, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might or could do inperson, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact andagents, or any of them or their or his substitute or resubstitute, may lawfullydo or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has hereunto sethis hand this 6th day of March 2003.

 

 

| /s/      Dennis D. Dammerman  | /s/      James A. Parke                   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Dennis D. Dammerman,          |  James A. Parke,                     |
| Chairman of the Board         | Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer) | (Principal Financial Officer)             |

 

|  | /s/      Joan C. Amble |
|--|------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         334,387                 390,439
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,538                  25,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     64,208                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               454,248                 425,357
<PP&E>                                         271,739                   9,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,538                   4,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 725,987                 435,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,258                 103,850
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,500                   5,100
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,199,234               1,199,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   725,987                 435,185
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,967                  15,242
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  720,495                 640,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (674,528)               (624,972)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,624                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (676,152)               (624,972)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (676,152)               (624,972)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)                  (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)                  (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
## NO. 12

- 19

- 00144

- CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: OLD REPUBLIC RISK MANAGEMENT, OLD REPU BLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, THORNTON, BIECHLIN, REYNOLDS & GUERRA, L.C., TIMO THY K. SINGLEY AND DANA M. GANNON, RELATOR S §

§

§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Relators, Old Republic Risk Management, Old Republic Insurance Company, Thornton, Biechlin, Reynolds, and Guerra, L.C., Timothy K. Singley, and Dana M. Gannon, filed this original proceeding to challenge Respondent’s denial of their plea to the jurisdiction and motion
to dismiss. 1 Debra Morris, Individually and as representative of the Estate of Kenneth W. Morris, Ashley Bialowas f/k/a Ashley Morris, Amanda Morris Wright, Jimmy Williams, Rebe cca Williams, Orlando Ordaz, and Roy McCollough are the Real Parties in Interest (RPIs).

On June 12, 2019, this Court conditionally granted Relators’ petition and directed Respondent to vacate his March 18, 2019, order denying Relators’ plea to the jurisd iction and issue an order (1) granting the plea to the jurisdiction with respect to the RPIs’ claims for fraudulent lien, insurance code violations, fraud, independent fraudulent acts by lawyer/law firm, and conspiracy to assert fraudulent lien; and (2) ab ating the trial court proceeding pending the Division of Workers’ Compensation’s resolution of whether Old Republic is entitled to seek administrative costs as part of its subrogation claim and whether the amount of benefits paid has been wrongfully
inflat ed. By an order signed on June 14, Respondent complied with this Court’s opinion and order,

1 Respondent is the Honorable Paul E. White, Judge of the 159th District Court in Angelina County, Texas.2 rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus

as moot

. Opinion delivered June 28, 2019. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)3 

## COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT

JUNE 28 , 2019

NO. 12

- 19

- 00144

- CV

OLD REPUBLIC RISK MA NAGEMENT, OLD REPUBL IC INSURANCE COMPANY ,

THORNTON, BIECHLIN, REYNOLDS & GUERRA, L .C., TIMOTHY K. SING LEY AND DANA M. GANNON, Relator s V.

HON. PAUL E. WHITE , Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Old Republic Risk Management, Old Republic Insurance Company, Thornton, Biechlin, Reynolds & Guerra, L.C., Timothy K. Singley
, and Dana M. Gannon; who are the relator s in appellate cause
number 12

- 19

- 00144

- CV and defendants in trial court cause number CV

- 00050

- 18

- 1, on the docket of the 159th Judicial District Court of Angelina County , Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on April 16, 2019, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue , it is therefore CONSIDERED,4 ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby di smissed as moot

. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this o pinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 97-40866 and 98-40384

Dennis Trevino, Pl aintiff-Appellant,

versus City of Corpus Christi, ET AL, Defendants, City of Corpus Christi, Texas; Juan Garza; Henry Garrett, Chief of Police, City of Corpus Christi, Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CV-376 December 8, 1998 Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM::
AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.6.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 23(ii)


To the Board of Directors
General Electric Capital Services, Inc.

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (No. 33-7348) on Form S-3  of General Electric Capital
Services, Inc., and in the Registration Statement (No. 33-61029) on
Form S-3 jointly filed by General Electric Capital Services, Inc. and
General Electric Company, of our report dated February 9, 1996,
relating to the statement of financial position of General
Electric Capital Services, Inc. and consolidated affiliates as of
December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the related statements of current
and retained earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1995, and related schedules
which report appears in the December 31, 1995 annual report on
Form 10-K of General Electric Capital Services, Inc.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 28, 1996
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Premier Exhibitions, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designated under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Arnie Geller
Filed: May 29, 1996

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7422

(CA-95-1597-DKC)

Darrell L. Ricks,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Donald Waltemeyer, et al,

Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER

The Court amends its opinion filed May 21, 1996, as follows:

On page 2, line 8 of opinion -- the phrase "that has conviction" is corrected to read "that his conviction."

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Bert M. Montague

Clerk
2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7422

DARRELL L. RICKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONALD WALTEMEYER; WILLIAM COLE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-1597-DKC)

Submitted: January 16, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell L. Ricks, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Charles Verderaime,

VERDERAIME & DUBOIS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order

but on modified grounds. Appellant's motion fails because his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) claim calls into question the validity of his

confinement, Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 489 (1973), and he

has not established that his conviction has been rendered invalid.

See Heck v. Humphrey, ___ U.S. ___, 62 U.S.L.W. 4594 (U.S. June 24,

1994) (No. 93-6188). Thus, the district court did not abuse its

discretion by denying the motion. See United States v. Williams,

674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Hover Check Aerial Productions

3025 Windermere Dr  Pensacola, Fl. 32503  Phone: 850

- 450

- 3491 E

- Mail: rsimpson@hover

- check.com Web: www.hover

- check.com

5/21/15

Ms.	Daniels,

Here	is	the	information	that	you	requested.	I	have	attached	the	Appendix	Sheet	from	the	manual	with	all	information	you	reque sted.

*	I	wish	to	withdrawal	my	need	for	MPTOM.

From: < Nia.Daniels@faa.gov > Date: Thursday,	May	21,	2015	at	9:20	AM
To: Richard	Simpson	< rsimpson@hover

- check.com > Cc: < 9

- AWA

- AVS

- 333Exemptions@faa.gov > Subject: Petition	for	Exemption:	Hover	Check	Aerial	Productions	(FAA

- 2015

- 0650)

May 21, 2015

Dear Mr. Simpson:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0650). This information i s necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e.

- fixed

- wing, rotorcraft, lighter

- than

- air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description should include the maxim um weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

• Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by June 4, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without noti fying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Genta Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
            May 13,
      2010





/s/ RAYMOND P. WARRELL, JR.,
      M.D.*Name:
                Raymond
      P. Warrell, Jr., M.D.Title:
                Chairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Genta Incorporated and will be retained by Genta Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**I, Michael L. Chasen, Chief Executive Officer of Blackboard Inc. (the “Company”), do herebycertify, under the standards set forth in and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30*,*2006 (the“Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: August 9, 2006           /s/ Michael L. Chasen     Michael L. Chasen    Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

          - [Docket No. DEA-875]

# AGENCY:

Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice of application; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 12, 2021, concerning a notice of application. The document indicated the approved drug code (1205—Lisdexamfetamine) as a schedule I. The correct drug schedule should read schedule II.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 12, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-17181 (86 FR 44405), on page 44406, in the first column, in the controlled substance table, correct the drug schedule to schedule II.                

Brian S. Besser,

Acting Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2022-00852 Filed 1-21-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P