alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sunday, March 06, 2016

Sec.11.63

Sec.11.81 Petition for Exemption

(A). Randy Pacheco

68-615 Farrington Hwy. 14A

Waialua, HI 96791

(916) 765-6516 emailrandypacheco@yahoo.com

ATP # 3134763 other pilots to be added later:

To whom I submit my petition: 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590

(B). The specific section: Title 14 FAR 105.17 

(C). The extent of relief we are seeking: Two years. 

(D) thru (F). The reason we seek the relief: Safety for skydivers and other air traffic. 

Expanded explanation: The exemption we are seeking is for skydiving operations within a 3 NM 

radius of Dillingham Airfield (PHDH). This would be a day time only exemption, in scattered to 

broken conditions with ceilings above 3,500ft, with positive visual ground references. With 

mountains to the south and ocean to the north the DZ (drop zone), we must be upwind of the LZ

(landing zone) to safely fly parachutes back. At the present time we are having to drop jumpers

far from the best areas in order to stay in VFR conditions. This is becoming more difficult to do 

safely and is resulting in more off-airport landings. See reference A. Allowing jumpers to freefall 

just clear of clouds or sometimes briefly through clouds and opening their parachutes under the 

bases of the clouds in the correct areas would be much safer for the jumpers and the air traffic 

surrounding the airfield. The highest percentage of air traffic in and around Dillingham Airfield 

is skydiving operations. Other operations are much lower level, such as glider operations and 

Coast Guard helicopter flights. These are procedurally separated by altitude from any freefall 

jump activity. Dillingham Field has very little General Aviation traffic, practically no IFR traffic, 

and no IFR approach or even Victor airway. Honolulu Control Facility has good radar and radio 

coverage in this area, and currently provide This exemption would only be at Dillingham 

Airfield.
(G).

Comments; Weather in the Dillingham Airfield area is challenging and constantly changing. 

Sometimes in this narrow corridor on a typical day the trade winds at 3000ft. can be 20 to 30 

knots. The cloud cover can change from clear to broken in minutes, from rain showers to blue 

skies just as quickly. The two C-208B Grand Caravans we fly are equipped with dual-com GPS 

and TCAS. If the pilot and the skydivers have positive visual contact with ground references this 

can be conducted safely. Australia and New Zealand both approved these types of commercial 

skydiving operational procedures over a decade ago. They have been completely successful, with 

zero safety incidents reported. (H). Outside the US does not apply.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-65550) pertaining to the 1999 Stock IncentivePlan and Options Granted Pursuant to Agreements of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-89828) pertaining to the registration of 2,067,298 shares of Class A common stock, the Registration Statement (FormS-3, No. 333-97159) pertaining to the registration of 1,718,580 shares of Class A common stock and the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-101706) pertaining to the registration of 225,000 shares of Class A common stock of our report datedFebruary 26, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/    ERNST &YOUNG LLP 

 

New York, New York 

April 15, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4603 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4603

      To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to expand the 
 humanitarian parole policy announced on January 18, 2010, to children 
legally confirmed as orphans eligible for intercountry adoption by the 
 Government of Haiti prior to the earthquake on January 12, 2010, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2010

 Mr. Hoekstra introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to expand the 
 humanitarian parole policy announced on January 18, 2010, to children 
legally confirmed as orphans eligible for intercountry adoption by the 
 Government of Haiti prior to the earthquake on January 12, 2010, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as--
            (1) the ``Haitian Orphan Placement Effort Act''; or
            (2) the ``HOPE Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF HAITIAN ORPHAN HUMANITARIAN PAROLE POLICY.

    (a) Additional Category of Orphans.--The Secretary of Homeland 
Security shall expand the humanitarian parole policy for certain 
Haitian orphans announced on January 18, 2010, so as to apply it, on a 
case-by-case basis as determined appropriate by the Secretary, to 
children who were legally confirmed as orphans eligible for 
intercountry adoption by the Government of Haiti before January 12, 
2010.
    (b) Safe and Secure Placements.--Placement of children granted 
humanitarian parole into the United States pursuant to the parole 
policy referred to in subsection (a) may include placement in an 
Unaccompanied Refugee Minor program, pursuant to section 412(d) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1522(d)), if a suitable 
family member is not available to provide care.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  of Genta  Incorporated  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q  for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2006 (the  Report),
I,  Richard J.  Moran,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of  the  Securities
Exchange  Act of  1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,
the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:                 | May 9, 2006                                                                         | 
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                      |                                                                                     | 
|/s/ RICHARD J. MORAN* |                                                                                    
|                      |                                                                                    
|Name:                 | Richard J.Moran                                                                     | 
|Title:                | Senior Vice
      President, Chief 
      Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary | 

* A signed
original of this written statement required by  Section 906 has been provided to Genta
Incorporated and will  be retained by Genta Incorporated and furnished to the  Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

46
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO******13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****

In connection with the quarterly report of WiFiMed Holdings Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory Vacca, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 19, 2007

| /s/ Gregory Vacca                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                 |
| Gregory Vacca      Chief Executive Officer and      Principal Financial Officer |
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

E RIC MOCARSKI , Appellant,

v.

GENESISCARE USA, INC., f/k/a 21 st CENTURY ONCOLOGY, INC. , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 2601

[ January 5, 2023 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the C ircuit C ourt for the Sevent eenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Carlos A. Rodriguez

, Judge; L.T. Case
No. CACE 22

- 003949

.
William R. Amlong and Jennifer Daley of The Amlong Firm

, Fort Lauderdale

, for appellant.

Rodolfo Gomez of Fordharrison, LLP, Miami, and Tracey K. Jaensch of Fordharrison, LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

M AY , C ONNER and K UNTZ , JJ. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### William Grant TEMPLE, Appellant, v. Robert PERGAMENT.

No. 15166.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted March 29, 1965.

Decided April 15, 1965.

William Grant Temple, Pro se.

Murray Fredericks, City Sol., Atlantic City, N. J. (Chaim H. Sandler, Associate City Sol., Atlantic City, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and WEBER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court dismissing this action as failing to state a federal cause of action against the defendant Pergament was legally correct and will be affirmed.
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**** 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Bellacasa Productions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edwin A. Reilly, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 17, 2006

| /s/ Edwin A. Reilly                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| Edwin A. Reilly       President and Chief Executive Officer      (Principal Executive Officer) and      Acting Chief Financial Officer      (Principal Financial Officer and       Principal Accounting Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       18
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    19
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      19
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                          18
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        19
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
                                               


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

November 18, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00432

- CR

Donald BRASSFIELD

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 16

- 1733

- CR

- A Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

When we granted court reporter Lori Sc hmid ’ s first motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record, we set the record due on November 7 , 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. R. 35.3(c).
After t he extended due date, the court reporter filed a second request for an extension of time to
file the record until Nov em ber 27

, 201 9

. The reporter’s request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record must be filed with this court by Nov ember 27 , 201 9

. See id. (limi ting any extension in an ordinary appeal to thirty days).

If the court reporter is unable to file the completed record by Nov ember 27 , 2019 , any further request for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written
status report.
The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages edited, pro ofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks).

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the requested date.

The preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached._________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of November, 2019

.

______________________________ _____ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### Maples *v.*State.

4844

290 S. W. 2d 627

Opinion delivered May 28, 1956.

*Fred Newth*and *Kenneth Goffelt,*for appellant.

*Tom Gentry,*Attorney General; *Thorp Thomas,*Asst. Atty. General, for appellee.

Sam BobiNsoN, Associate Justice.

Appellant was convicted in the Pulaski Circuit Court of the crime of manslaughter, and, on July 18, 1955, during the March term of the Circuit Court, he was sentenced to three years in the penitentiary. The judgment was affirmed by this court January 9, 1956. *Maples*v. *State,*225 Ark. 785, 286 S. W. 2d 15. Subsequently, on February 7,1956, during the September 1955 term of Circuit Court, Maples filed what is designated as a motion to vacate the judgment. The motion alleges that a witness is now available who will testify that she saw the killing, and that Maples acted in self-defense. The motion further alleges that this witness was incompetent at the time of the first trial, and, therefore, was unable to testify. The trial court denied the motion, and Maples has appealed.

Prior to the trial in July 1955, Maples had filed a, motion asking for a continuance on the ground that the witness referred to was not available at that time, but could be called as a witness later if a continuance were granted. The court denied the continuance, and, on appeal, there was no contention that the court erred in doing so.

Appellant now seeks a new trial, relying on authority of Ark. Stats. § 29-506, which provides: “.The court *486in which a judgment or a final order has been rendered or made, shall have power, after the expiration of the term-,' to' 'vacate ■ or modify such judgment or order, .Seventh: For unavoidable casualty or misfortune preventing the party from appearing or- defending.” This statute has no application to criminal cases. *Thomas*v. *State,*136 Ark. 290, 206 S. W. 435; *Smith*v. *State,*200 Ark. 767, 140 S. W. 2d 675.

Appellant also says his constitutional rights were violated; however, the point is not argued, and no authority is cited.

Affirmed.
#### People v Binion,

No. 90917;

Court of Appeals No. 129637.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Global Perspective Portfolio L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      21,196,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  221,142<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,441,520<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,441,520<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,832,697<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,924,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,908,617
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,908,617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,908,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include due from DWR of $149,296 and interest receivable
of $71,846.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $990,670 and net option premiums of $33,115.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $257,027, accrued brokerage
commissions of $95,063, accrued management fees of $55,796, accrued
administrative expenses of $20,886 and accrued transaction fees and
costs of $7,192.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $4,233,825, net
change in unrealized of $(85,703) and interest income of $684,575.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001003114
<NAME> IMPATH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                         941,903
<SECURITIES>                                23,395,398
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,791,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,732,041
<INVENTORY>                                     69,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,978,712
<PP&E>                                       4,964,555
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,572,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,581,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,513,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,608
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,856,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,581,382
<SALES>                                     21,965,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,965,463
<CGS>                                        8,234,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,327,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,092,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,434,510
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             224,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,667,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,620,609
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,637,982
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   602,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38



</TABLE>