alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of Compensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.5 

Rentrak Corporation 

Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors 

Each non-employee director of Rentrak Corporation (“Rentrak”) who is independent (as defined in the corporate governance
standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market) is paid an annual retainer of $30,000. In addition, the chair of the Compensation Committee and the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee each receive a $3,000 annual retainer, the chair of the Audit
Committee receives a $5,000 annual retainer, and each other independent director who serves on the Audit Committee receives a $2,500 annual retainer. Non-employee directors are also paid $1,200 for each board meeting attended in person. After an
independent director has attended four committee meetings that were not held at the same time as a board meeting, the director is paid $600 for each subsequent committee meeting attended in person or by telephone. The Chairman of the Board (who is
neither an employee nor independent) receives an annual cash retainer of $50,000 in lieu of any other compensation for his services in that position. Rentrak also reimburses non-employee directors for their travel expenses for each meeting attended
in person. 
 Beginning in August 2010, each independent director will be granted $100,000 of deferred stock units
(“DSUs”) at or about the time of each annual meeting of shareholders under Rentrak’s Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The DSUs represent the right to receive an equal number of shares of
Rentrak’s Common Stock pursuant to the terms and conditions of the 2005 Plan on a deferred basis in compliance with the terms of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The number of DSUs covered by each grant will be
determined by dividing $100,000 by the stock trading price on the date of grant and rounding to the nearest whole number. 
 The
DSUs will vest in equal monthly installments over the ensuing 11 calendar months, as long as the recipient continues to be a director at the end of the applicable month. Unvested DSUs will also fully vest upon termination of the recipient’s
service on the Board as a result of death, disability, after reaching age 75, or upon a change in control of Rentrak during the vesting period. Vested DSU awards become payable following the recipient’s ceasing to be a director of Rentrak.

 Awards prior to 2010 generally were for 9,000 DSUs per year. The DSU awards granted in 2006 and 2007 vested on the one-year
anniversary of the grant date, while DSUs granted in 2008 and 2009 vest in three equal annual installments beginning one year after the grant date, provided that the recipient continues to be a director on the vesting date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          19,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (23,337)
<INVENTORY>                                     38,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             (107,413)
<PP&E>                                          52,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                (26,411)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          212,247
<BONDS>                                         97,828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                   (154,426)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,207
<SALES>                                        375,569
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               375,569
<CGS>                                          296,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  296,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               421,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               263,291
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (281,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,882
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (322,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (477)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,888
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (320,722)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (19.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (19.50)


</TABLE>
Case: 3:17-mj-00505-PBS Doc #: 6 Filed: 01/18/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 21
IN THE MATTER OF • EV THE 

THE PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT * 

OF GRAYSON JOHN-ALLEN ECKEL • COURT OF APPEALS 

TO THE BAR OF MARYLAND 

• OF MARYLAND 

• Misc. Docket AG 

• No. 64 

• September Term, 2015 

ORDER 

The Court having considered the Petition for Reinstatement of Grayson John-Allen Eckel 

and the response filed thereto by Bar Counsel in the above captioned case, it is this 

18th day of February ,2016 

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, 

GRANTED, and the Petitioner, Grayson John-Allen Eckel is hereby reinstated by this Court to 

the practice of law in Maryland, and it is further 

ORDERED, that said reinstatement is conditioned upon Petitioner's compliance with the 

terms of the Alcohol/Drug Monitoring Agreement entered into by Petitioner on December 15, 

2015, and it is further 

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall replace the name of Grayson John-Allen 

Eckel on the register of the attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the 

Client Protection Fund and to the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State. 

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera 

Chief Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc.(the "Company")
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mark Clancy
---------------------------------
Mark Clancy
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Date: September 8, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Mar 18 1507:53p Earth Science Products 

# EARTH SCIENCE PRODUCTS March 

### 16, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration 

### 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, 

### D.C. 

### 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

### WilburWright Building- Suite 2W1000 Fax No. 202/267 -1293 RE: 

### FAA Case No. 2014NM20027 Earth Science Products Corp. 23735 NE Airport Road Aurora, OR 97002 Fax No. 503 

### f 678- 3374 Ladies and gentlemen: 503-678-3374 p.1

Earth Science Products Corp., the Respondent in the above referenced matter, having reached a negotiated settlement ofthe above-referenced matter, herebywithdraws its appeal and asks that the matter be dismissed with prejudice. Regards,



# .~~~

Shane Kennedy President+ CEO Earth Science Products Corp

23735NE

### A.itportRoad• Aurora • Oregon97002• ph. 503 678 1216 • fax 503 678 3374

**l~'1l'1·~.r;,ea}J.""thscienceproducts.** 

### co.tn
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-170906, 333-168599, 333-161163, 333-152576, 333-127354, 333-107988, 333-101828, 333-74610, 333-52598, 333-49350, 333-59843,
333-37111, and 333-20225 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 4, 2011 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of new accounting guidance issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board related to business combinations), relating to the consolidated financial statements of Zoran Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively the Company) as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zoran Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|San Jose, California     
|March 4, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Indian Gaming Commission

          - 25 CFR Part 537
          - RIN 3141-AA77

# AGENCY:

National Indian Gaming Commission, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects the preamble to a proposed rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 2, 2021, regarding Fees. The document contained incorrect dates for submitting comments. This correction clarifies that comments are due January 31, 2022.                    

      ( print page 2384)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Hoenig, 202-632-7003.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of December 2, 2021, in proposed rule FR Doc. 2021-25838, on page 68445, in the first column, change the                     **Dates**                     caption to read:                

**DATES:**                     Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before January 31, 2022.                

Dated: January 6, 2022.

Michael Hoenig,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2022-00630 Filed 1-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7565-01-P
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

6/19/2019

 Southern District of Ohio

Michael Larson, Counterclaim Defendant

3:18-cv-00004

Cassano's Inc., Counterclaim Plaintiff

✔ Defendant Cassano’s Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed;

Defendant’s counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); and case is

terminated on the docket of this Court.

✔ Sharon L. Ovington

Summary Judgment
# Daughter of Virgin Islands Guardsmen Continues Legacy

/ Published April 4, 2024

FORT CAVAZOS, Texas - Every April, the Department of Defense celebrates the selfless service and duty demonstrated by military-connected children, youth and teens. Pfc. T’Anna Stanley-Lake’s deep sense of pride and duty to her country began early on in her life.

Born and raised on the island of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, she is the daughter of former Virgin Islands National Guard members Kim Stanley and the late Sgt. 1st Class Floyd E. Lake, who died in a UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter crash in Baghdad Jan. 20, 2007. Despite the tragic event, Stanley-Lake was inspired to continue the family’s legacy of service.

“I felt a profound sense of purpose and determination,” says Stanley-Lake. “Hearing I resemble both my parents stuck with me. Along with the impact my mom has and the big footprint my father left on the Virgin Islands National Guard, I figured I would do the same, except go bigger and be active duty.” 

With echoes of positive encouragement ringing in her ears, she made the life-changing decision to enlist in the Army in November 2022.

She completed Basic Combat Training at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, and her Advanced Individual Training in Fort Sam Houston, Texas, specializing as a 68R Veterinary Food Inspection Specialist. 

Stanley-Lake is stationed at the U.S. Army Public Health Activity at North Texas Branch Fort Cavazos, Texas. Her duty assignment with the Army North Military Funeral Honors Platoon Caisson Section at Fort Sam Houston represents her unwavering commitment to honoring fallen members of the military with the utmost respect and pride across the southern region of Texas.

This sense of duty and honor was epitomized on Feb. 22 as she participated in the 3-24th Infantry Regiment Buffalo Soldier Headstone Dedication, a poignant and unforgettable moment in her journey of service and sacrifice.

Though no longer a child, Stanley-Lake’s story is one of resilience and perseverance, having paid the ultimate sacrifice, the loss of a parent in the line of duty. 

Nevertheless, her dedication to her duties reflects her determination to leave an indelible mark, following in her parents’ footsteps while charting her own path of distinction as an active-duty member of the U.S. Army.
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4214 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 45300 Portola Avenue in Palm Desert, California, as the ‘‘Roy Wilson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4214 EH

1 SECTION 1. ROY WILSON POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 45300 Portola Avenue in Palm 

4 Desert, California, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Roy Wilson Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Roy Wilson Post Of10 fice’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 18, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4214 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Palm Desert, California, as the ‘‘Roy Wilson al Service located at 45300 Portola Avenue in
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

S&S HOLDCO, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

THREE RIVERS PROVIDER 

NETWORK, INC., 

 Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-00783

Judge William O. Bertelsman

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

Now comes Plaintiff S&S Holdco, Inc., by and through counsel, and pursuant to S.D. Ohio 

Local Rule 7.3 respectfully requests a 24-hour extension as to the deadlines set forth in this Court’s 

January 8, 2021 (Doc#75) and January 13, 2021 (Doc#76) respective Orders regarding (i) 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel; and (ii) Defendant’s Motion Opposing the Extension of the Expert 

Deadline. Due to recent inclement weather and a resulting power outage, Plaintiff’s counsel has 

been delayed in finalizing its motion to compel and needs an additional 24-hours in order to prepare 

the same for filing. Plaintiff’s counsel has conferred with Defendant’s counsel who has no 

opposition to this motion. 

A proposed order is attached in accordance with S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.4.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Peter A. Saba

Peter A. Saba (0055535)

Joshua M. Smith (0092360)

Jeffrey M. Nye (0082247)

STAGNARO, SABA

& PATTERSON CO., L.P.A.

2623 Erie Avenue

Cincinnati, Ohio 45208

(513) 533-2701

(513) 533-2711 (fax)

pas@sspfirm.com

Attorneys for S&S Healthcare

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 77 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 401
2

As Seen and Agreed,

/s/ Simon Y. Svirnovskiy, (via authorization)

Maureen A. Bickley (0085075)

Stephen R. Hemick (0088381)

Simon Y. Svirnovskiy (0097096

Frost Brown Todd LLC

3300 Great American Tower

301 East Fourth Street

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

(513) 651-6800

mbickley@fbtlaw.com

shermick@fbtlaw.com

Counsel for Three Rivers Provider Network

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing was served on all counsel of record on the date of filing 

through the court’s CM/ECF system.

/s/ Peter A. Saba

Peter A. Saba (0055535)

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 77 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 402
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000443 28-MAR-2016 09:06 AM
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Paul S. Lipschutz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by Collectible Concepts
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




Date:
                January 16, 2007
            By:
            */s/
              PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ*Paul
                S. LipschutzChief
                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Insignia Solutions plc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Collins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ROBERT E. COLLINSRobert E. Collins Chief Financial
OfficerMarch 15, 2004 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Globix Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
K. Stevenson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Date: December 6, 2004                                 GLOBIX CORPORATION


                                                       /s/ Peter K. Stevenson
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Peter K. Stevenson
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
Order entered January 30 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00962
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 00963
- CR ALLEN HO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. F13
- 58092
- J , F13
- 58094
- J



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeals

. On January 21, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief ha d not been filed. On January 26, 2015, we received appellant’s br ief, together with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeals, we VACATE the January 21, 2015 order requiring findings. We note that the clerk’s records do not contain the trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right to appeal nor has the Court separately received them. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare and file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order,certifications of appellant’s right to appeal that accurately reflect the trial court proceedings

. See

T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State , 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Gracie Lewis, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 3; Felici a Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE