alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 19, 2015

Mr. Andrew Weathers

800 South Pine Street, Suite D

Spartanburg, SC 29302

Dear Mr. Weathers:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request, posted to the public docket on July 21, 2015, and filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−3063, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
September 18, 2015

Mr. William M. Mikkelson

Owner

First Defense Systems LLC

1109 Pleasant Valley Road

West Bend, WI 53095

Dear Mr. Mikkelson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23, 61.113, 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.203(a) and (b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a), and part 21, Subpart H, of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you 

should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your May 19, 2015, exemption request on behalf of First Defense Systems LLC

filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2084, but we are unable to process your request any further. 

Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to 

consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. Case No. 2:17-cr-243

John Charles Fortner

ORDER

The government has moved to correct a scrivener’s error

contained in Count Two of the indictment. The government indicates

that this count includes the language “felony offense involving a

minor as alleged in Count One of this Information” which should

read “Count One of this Indictment.” Defendant has not opposed the

motion.

Although the general rule is that an indictment may only be

amended by a grand jury, the court may authorize an amendment when

“the change is merely a matter of form.” Russell v. United States,

369 U.S. 749, 770 (1962). Changes of form include corrections of

clerical or typographical errors. See United States v. Rosenbaum,

628 F. App’x 923, 929-30 (6th Cir. 2015); Short v. United States,

471 F.3d 686, 693 (6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Lake, 985 F.2d

265, 271 (6th Cir. 1993). The error in this case is clerical in

nature, and the proposed amendment would not impact the nature of

the offense charged or deprive the defendant of adequate notice of

the charge against him.

The motion (Doc. 24) is granted. The indictment is hereby

amended to substitute the word “Indictment” for the word

“Information” in Count Two of the indictment. 
It is so ordered.

Date: May 18, 2018 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
CATRINA M. BELLIS, Case Number: 1:17-cv-836
Plaintiff,
Barrett, J.
vs. Litkovitz, M.J.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, REPORT AND
Defendant. RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion to remand this case for further
administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to enter
judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. (Doc. 33). Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, this
matter shall be remanded back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings
pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On
remand, the Agency will reevaluate plaintiffs claim, develop the record as necessary to
determine whether plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, and issue a

new decision.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT the parties’ joint motion to remand
(Doc. 19) be GRANTED; this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for
further administrative proceedings; and the Clerk of Court enter a separate judgment as required

by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.

pate:(0/S8 Bain & Xbb

Karen L. Litkovitz ”
United States Magistrate Judge



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
CATRINA M. BELLIS, Case Number: 1:17-cv-836
Plaintiff,
Barrett, J.
vs. Litkovitz, M.J.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES REGARDING THE FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO R&R
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of

the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the
proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on
timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected
to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report
and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral
hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such
portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the
assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections
WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in
accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140

(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, Mitchell H. Gold, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Dendreon Corporation
(the Company), and Martin A. Simonetti, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1.The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



Dated: August 5, 2004



|                           |  |                        
|-------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Mitchell H. Gold, M.D. |  | /s/ Martin A. Simonetti
|Mitchell H. Gold, M.D.     |  | Martin A. Simonetti    
|Chief Executive Officer    |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT Oct. 29, 2012 Report Request ID: 1031642 Report Code: AMP430

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:FMC

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 04 023 88101 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS OZONE EVALUATION AGENCY ROLE MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value SEASONAL-HOURLY REPORTING YES SORT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Order Column

EPA_REGION STATE_CODE MONITOR_TYPE COUNTY_CODE SITE_ID PARAMETER_CODE POC GLOBAL DATES 2012 Start Date End Date 2012 01 12 Tribal CodeOct. 29, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 1 of 4 MONITORS NOT REPORTINGOct. 29, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 2 of 4 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

Arizona MONITOR TYPE: Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality SLAMS JAN. 01, 2012 DEC. 31, 2012

THRU SITE ID CITY ADDRESS PARAMETER POCDURATION METHOD ------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------- NUMBER / PERCENT 04-023-0004 88101PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 7 Nogales 300 N MORLEY AVE 143 5 100% 5

100% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 5 100% 30 49% MONITORS REPORTING

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR STATE: REP ORG:Oct. 29, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 3 of 4 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

Arizona MONITOR TYPE: Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality QA COLLOCATED JAN. 01, 2012 DEC. 31, 2012

THRU SITE ID CITY ADDRESS PARAMETER POCDURATION METHOD ------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------- NUMBER / PERCENT 04-023-0004 88101PM2.5 - Local Conditions 2 7 Nogales 300 N MORLEY AVE 143 5 100% 5

100% 5 100% 4

80% 5 100% 5 100% 29 48% MONITORS REPORTING

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR STATE: REP ORG:Oct. 29, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 4 of 4 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

Arizona MONITOR TYPE: MONITOR TYPE:

Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality SLAMS QA COLLOCATED JAN. 01, 2012 DEC. 31, 2012

THRU

PARAMETER PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS 88101 88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions

PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 1 0 0 0 0 49.0% 48.0% 1 1 0 0 0 0 49.0% 48.0% 2 0 0 48.5% 2 0 0 48.5% 2 0 0 48.5% 2 0 0 48.5% Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality Arizona REGION SUMMARY:(09) SAN FRANCISCO REPORT SUMMARY: MT SUMMARY: MT SUMMARY:SLAMS

QA COLLOCATED REPORT SUMMARY STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY:
Case: 2:17-cr-00237-EAS Doc #: 39 Filed: 02/22/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 68
Case: 2:17-cr-00237-EAS Doc #: 39 Filed: 02/22/18 Page: 2 of 6 PAGEID #: 69
Case: 2:17-cr-00237-EAS Doc #: 39 Filed: 02/22/18 Page: 3 of 6 PAGEID #: 70
Case: 2:17-cr-00237-EAS Doc #: 39 Filed: 02/22/18 Page: 4 of 6 PAGEID #: 71
Case: 2:17-cr-00237-EAS Doc #: 39 Filed: 02/22/18 Page: 5 of 6 PAGEID #: 72
Case: 2:17-cr-00237-EAS Doc #: 39 Filed: 02/22/18 Page: 6 of 6 PAGEID #: 73
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4462 

AN ACT 

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash 

contributions for the relief of victims of the earthquake 

in Haiti. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4462 EH

1 SECTION 1. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR 

2 CHARITABLE CASH CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RE3 LIEF OF VICTIMS OF EARTHQUAKE IN HAITI. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of section 170 of the 

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any 

6 contribution described in subsection (b) made after Janu7 ary 11, 2010, and before March 1, 2010, as if such con8 tribution was made on December 31, 2009, and not in 

9 2010. 

10 (b) CONTRIBUTION DESCRIBED.—A contribution is 

11 described in this subsection if such contribution is a cash 

12 contribution made for the relief of victims in areas af13 fected by the earthquake in Haiti on January 12, 2010, 

14 for which a charitable contribution deduction is allowable 

15 under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

16 (c) RECORDKEEPING.—In the case of a contribution 

17 described in subsection (b), a telephone bill showing the 

18 name of the donee organization, the date of the contribu19 tion, and the amount of the contribution shall be treated 

20 as meeting the recordkeeping requirements of section 

21 170(f)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 
3 

•HR 4462 EH

1 (d) PAYGO.—All applicable provisions in this section 

2 are designated as an emergency for purposes of pay-as3 you-go principles. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 20, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4462 

AN ACT 

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable 

earthquake in Haiti. cash contributions for the relief of victims of the
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT


TO


DISTILLER’S
GRAIN MARKETING AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT TO
DISTILLER’S GRAIN MARKETING AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is entered
into effective as of June 7, 2010, by and between Grainte Falls Energy,
LLC, a Minnesota limited liablity company (the “Seller”) and CHS Inc., a
Minnesota cooperative corporation (the “Buyer”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.            Seller and Commodity Specialists Company
entered into a certain Distiller’s Grain Marketing Agreement dated as of December 1,
2004, which was subsequently assigned by Commodity Specialists Company to Buyer
(the “Agreement”); and


 


B.            Subject to the terms and conditions set
forth herein, Seller and Buyer desire to amend description of the Products to
be sold under the Agreement, as provided herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.                                      Purchase and Sale. 
The first
sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is deleted and replaced in its
entirety with the following:


 


“Seller agrees to sell to
Buyer and Buyer agrees to purchase from Seller the entire bulk feed grade DDGS
output from Seller’s plant at Granite Falls Minnesota (hereinafter, the “Plant”),
other than the Montevideo Intermodal facility sales (defined below), subject to
all terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties
agree that Seller may sell DDGS from the Plant to Montevideo Intermodal facility,
or its subsidiaries (collectively, “Motevideo Intermodal”) for delivery to the
Montevideo Intermodal container loading facility located in Montevideo,
Minnesota, without any fees, commissions or amounts due Buyer, provided that
Seller notifies Buyer of the quantity to be sold under this provision prior to
any such sale.”


 


2.                                      Reminaing Terms Unchanged. 
Except as
set forth in this Amendment, all terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged
and in full force and effect.


 


3.                                      Definitions.  Any
capitalized term not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth
in the Agreement.


 


4.                                      Counterparts 
This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original, but all of which will constitute on in the same
instrument.  Any executed counterpart of
this Amendment delivered by facsimile or other electronic transmission to a
party to the Amendment will constitute an original counterpart of this
Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned have duly executed this
Amendment effective as of the date first above written.


 


	
  Granite Falls Energy,
  LLC

  	
   

  	
  CHS Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Tracey L. Olson

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Steve Markham

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Its:

  	
  CEO/GM

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  Merchant
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for
the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc.(the "Company")
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                /s/ Mark Clancy
                                --------------------------------
                                Mark Clancy
                                Chief Executive Officer,
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Executive Officer and
                                Principal Financial Officer)

                                Date: September 27, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND OFFICERS
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
                   OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Imran Firoz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Giant Jr. Investments
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am the registrant's only certifying officer. I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I am the registrant's only certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I am the registrant's only certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

/s/ Imran Firoz
------------------
Imran Firoz
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
July 19, 2004

                                       18
EXHIBIT 32
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Russell M. Medford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/RUSSELL M. MEDFORDRussell M. MedfordPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2004
 
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark P. Colonnese, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/MARK P. COLONNESEMark P. ColonneseSenior Vice President of Finance and Administrationand Chief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2004