alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Globix Corporation as of September 30, 2006

---

|                                             |  | State/Country of          
|-------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                           |  | Incorporation/Organization
|                                            
|ATC Merger Corp.                             |  | New York                  
|                                            
|BLP Acquisition LLC                          |  | New York                  
|                                            
|415 Greenwich GC, LLC                        |  | New York                  
|                                            
|415 Greenwich GC Tenant LLC                  |  | New York                  
|                                            
|415 Greenwich MM LLC                         |  | New York                  
|                                            
|Globix Hosting LLC                           |  | Delaware                  
|                                            
|Globix Denmark ApS                           |  | Denmark                   
|                                            
|Globix (Netherlands) BV                      |  | Netherlands               
|                                            
|NEON Communications, Inc.                    |  | Delaware                  
|                                            
|NEON Optica, Inc.                            |  | Delaware                  
|                                            
|NorthEast Optic Network of Connecticut, Inc. |  | Delaware                  
|                                            
|NorthEast Optic Network of New York, Inc.    |  | Delaware                  
|                                            
|NEON Securities Corp.                        |  | Massachusetts             
|                                            
|NEON Connect, Inc.                           |  | Delaware                  
|                                            
|NEON Transcom, Inc.                          |  | Delaware                  
|                                            
|NEON Virginia Connect, LLC                   |  | Delaware                  
|                                            

---
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60134

Summary Calendar

 

JAMIE JONES,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RANKIN COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, ET AL.,

 

Defendants,

KEN DICKERSON, BILL PHILLIPS,

 DefendantsAppellants.

--------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:99-CV-816-WS

---------------------------------------------------------

January 24, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART AND DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ken Dickerson and Bill Phillips appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for

summary judgment based on qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. On appeal,
-2-

Dickerson and Phillips argue that they are entitled to qualified immunity because Jamie Jones did

not produce enough competent summary judgment evidence to: (1) establish that any issues of

material fact exist; (2) show that Phillips and Dickerson had sufficient personal involvement in the

events to justify liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; or (3) establish that he suffered any injury.

If Jones’ factual allegations are accepted as true, as required by Behrens v. Pelletier, 516

U.S. 299, 313 (1996), it is not apparent that Dickerson and Phillips are entitled to qualified

immunity as a matter of law. See Hope v. Pelzer, 122 S.Ct. 2508, 2512 (2002). Because facts

material to the question of qualified immunity are in dispute, this court lacks jurisdiction over the

Dickerson and Phillips’ appeal. See Mangieri v. Clifton, 29 F.3d 1012, 1016 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the disposition of this

case, all outstanding motions are denied.

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; ALL OUTSTANDING

MOTIONS ARE DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTHI] HAR 20 PM I 16
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OFII
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

A nO
i DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. WESTERN DIY
Plaintiff, : INFORMATION

7 3 8:17 cr-037

ROBERT PHELPS,

MOOR) tue

Defendant.

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES THAT:

COUNT ONE
On or about July 30, 2015, in the Southern District of Ohio, the defendant, ROBERT
PHELPS, knowingly possessed matters which contain visual depictions that had been shipped
and transported using any means and facility of interstate and foreign commerce, and that had
been shipped and transported in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, the producing of
such visual depictions involved the use of prepubescent minors engaging in sexually explicit
conduct, and such visual depictions were of such conduct.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2).

BENJAMIN C. GLASSMAN
United States Attorney

O Lua b—

ANDREW J. HUNT
Assistant United States Attorney
----

EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO******13 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****

In connection with the quarterly report of WiFiMed Holdings Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey Simon, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 19, 2007

/s/ Jeffrey Simon                 Jeffrey Simon    Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

VERA-JEAN G. RANDALL, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-mc-12 

vs. 

L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al., District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

 Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________________________________________________

ORDER DENYING MOVANTS’ MOTION 

FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUBPOENA (DOC. 1) 

_________________________________________________________________________________ 

This miscellaneous matter is before the Court on the motion for issuance of a subpoena filed 

by movants L-3 Communications Corporation and John T. DeMonic, Jr. Doc. 1. Movants seek an 

order directing the Clerk to issue a subpoena directed to the United States Air Force that requests the 

production of documents in connection with a civil action pending in the 191st Judicial District of 

Dallas County, Texas (Case No. DC-16-12264). Id. Because the action for which movants seek 

discovery is not pending in this Court, the subpoena requested by movants would be facially invalid 

and unenforceable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2) (stating that “[a] subpoena must issue from the court 

where the action is pending”); see also U.S. Risk Ins. Grp., Inc. v. U.S. Risk Mgmt., LLC, No. 3:11-

CV-2843-M-BN, 2014 WL 4055372, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2014) (holding that “[a] subpoena 

that violates Rule 45(a)(2)’s requirement is facially invalid and cannot be enforced”). Accordingly, 

movant’s motion (doc. 1) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: January 3, 2018 s/ Michael J. Newman 

 Michael J. Newman 

 United States Magistrate Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Pyramid Breweries Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-91290 and 333-16311) on Form S-8 of Pyramid Breweries Inc. of our report
dated January 10, 2003, with respect to the balance sheet of Pyramid Breweries
Inc. as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
appears in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pyramid Breweries
Inc.

Our report refers to our audit of the disclosures added to revise the 2001 and
2000 financial statements, as more fully described in Note 1 to the financial
statements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review or apply any
procedures to the 2001 and 2000 financial statements other than with respect to
such disclosures. Our report also refers to the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Intangible Assets" on
January 1, 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 25, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00033]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 7, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Holly A. Rieser, Manager) 
P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can also be sent 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#61220e0c0c040f15124f0011110d08020015080e0f122112150d124f0713034f0e1306"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82c1edefefe7ecf6f1ace3f2f2eeebe1e3f6ebedecf1c2f1f6eef1ace4f0e0acedf0e5">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Omni Bank Group, Inc., Little Rock, Arkansas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring Community State Bank, Bradley, Arkansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 3, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-00033 Filed 1-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# .119 8 Exterio rPain t Nort h Arro w 

### Omah a Lea d Sit e Owne rName : COLORAD O CLASSI C PRO P f j Goo d 

### Sit e Sketc h Address : 322 6 EMME TS T f j Poo r

Phone : n ZoStlta^b m W : 

# f1 r j No t pain t Sampl e Numbe r Lea d Sampl e . A R Sample s Collecte d Concentratio n Collecte d Firm : f M H3~ } T & RYASCPXA-3119 8 F 1 

# 15 7 pp m 

# Ff 

# n Date : 1"^ ' f - RYBSCPXA-3119 8 F 2 

### "2.32 . pp m FTn Time : / 2 •• ' 35 " RYCSCPXA-3119 8 B 1 "^ o. ^ F 

### >p m FJ " 

### Q S ample s Analyze d RYDSCPXA-3119 8 B 2 

### IMftf cc >p m 

### F J n -ROZSCPXA31-10 8 92 - 

### c 

### O /^3 7 l^Z . 

### ~ " 

### >p m 

### D XR F Unit : Book - RGZSCPXA31-10 8 GZ - ~ ~ r . 

# >p m 

# n n RPZSCPXA3110 8 P2 - ~ r . 

# p m n n T me 1 /^/? 7 r * f/ r c ,taff : ^-/ 4 Numbe ro fS a mple s - i " Y, : 

# ] 

# l 

# 4j N T ER E 3L- . 

# - - SE P 

# 0 92 0 9 5



# . 5 

# ( I4>8 6



## 6 

# I j 

# ^ ^ • 

# .: . 1 . .

_t—_ 

## ——
1 

# t 7 

## /

# -/ I f l i 

# a r ~5?-2i * 

# ? 

# LL? «

.. . 

# . 1 ... . 

# 1
• 

# Illlllllll l W Au K Superfun d 

### eM^e-r-V r: Omah aLeadSit e 4613 0 4028655 7

# 3119 8 Exterio rPain t Nort h Arro w 

### Owne rName : .COLORAD O CLASSI C PRO P Omah a Lea d Sit e Address : 322 6 EM_METS T

Phone : H : 36 3 <?/£*/&/ 4 w Sit e Sketc h fj fj G

Goo d Poo r No t pain t 1 ^

/ Sampl e Numbe r Lea d Concentratio n Sampl e Collecte d Firm : Sample s Collecte d FbA H 3~ l T£ > RYASCPXA-3119 8 F 1 15 7 pp m 0 ^

G Date : f ­ 7-^ ' RYBSCPXA-3119 8 RYCSCPXA-3119 8 RYDSCPXA-3119 8 F2 B 1 B 2 2.3 2 

# ^o 3 1 M 6 k po m 

# po m pp m PT 

# r^r

n r (" I 

# r~ i

n Time : /2:35 " Sample s Analyze d •RDZSCPXA3110 8 pri^cpp vAq-iin p RP 7 SCP VA3110f t BZ ­ 0 7 P" 7 " " 

# •" * 

# " ~ po m



# po m po m O



# n n P I 

# n n XR F Unit " Date : 

### Time ' /0^>~ 7 Rook ­ ? -26>~03 T 

### /^/ M /3 2

Numoe ro fbample s ­ . . : T; ; 

### Staff : ^-> 4 

# "T~ 

# ENTER S 

# .-4 j SE P 

# 0 9 2 

# t

WAU K
Omah aLea dSit e 4613 0

# 11198 ' Sit e Exterio rPain t Nort h Arro w Owne rName : COLORAD O CLASSI C PRO P Omah a Lea d 

### D Goo d 

### Sit e Sket c h Address : 3226_E_MMET_S T f j Poo r Phone : H :3o3<?/&*/6/ W 

# < W : [~ | Not pain t Sampl e Numbe r Lea d Concentratio n Sampl e Collecte d 

### LA B Firm : Sample s Collecte d FbAMf / T£ > RYASCPXA-3119 8 F 1 15 7 pp m R ' Date : f ­ I'* ' RYBSCPXA-3119 8 F2 "2.32 . pp m PT 

### D Time : 1^- •35 ' RYCSCPXA-3119 8 RYDSCPXA-3119 8 B 1 B 2 58 3 \ L \b\ 0 pp m

pp m \p f R " 

## D Sample s Analyze d •RDZSCPXA3110 8 —92 ­ ~ " pp m O XR F Unit ­ /0?>~ 7 R^/->L " \^ 7 RGZSCPXA3110 8 —62 ­ ~ ~ pp m F l

—RPZSCPXA3110 8 —PZ — ~ * po m F l 

# n Time * 

# '' u Numbe ro fSample s — ; T Staff : 

## L A 

# ENTERE I SE P09 208 5
0 1 

# n

\$ 7 r

Omah aLea dSit e 4613 0
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ ___ _ NO. 09

- 12

- 00 532

- C R NO. 09

- 12

- 00533

- CR

________________ ___ _

WILBUR BRANDON NIXON a/k/a WILBUR NIXON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________________ __________________________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No s . 11

- 12114 and 11

- 13031

________________________________________ __________________________ ORDER

On January 11, 2013 , appellant’s appointed counsel filed motion s to

withdraw and brief s which urge this Court to review th ese appeal s pursuant to
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). See In

re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 , 408

- 09 (Te x. Crim. App. 2008). Counsel certified

service of the motion s to withdraw and the brief s on the appellant. Counsel states2 that he provided appellant with a copy of the reporter’s record s and notified
appellant of his right to review the record s and file pro se brief s

. It is, therefore, ORDERED that appellant, Wilbur Brandon Nixon a/k/a

Wilbur Nixon , be given 60 days from the date hereof to file pro se brief s . It is,
further, ORDERED that the State may file reply brief s , due 30 days from the date
appellant files his brief s , or if no brief s are filed by appellant, 70 days from the

date hereof.
It is further ORDERED that counsel for appellant advis e appellant of his
right to seek discretionary review under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.

See Tex. R. App. P. 48.4; see also Tex. R. App. P. 68.

ORDER ENTERED February 7, 2013

.
PER CURIAM
Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Green Oaks Concepts,  Ltd.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Daniel L. Hodges,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting  Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.60.1

Amendment to Employment Agreement

This Amendment to Employment Agreement (Amendment) is
entered into as of 25 September 2007 (Effective Date), by and between Kirk A. Benson (the Executive) and Headwaters Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the Company).

RECITALS

Headwaters and Executive entered
into an Employment Agreement effective 1 April 2005 (Employment Agreement). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of section 2(D) of the Employment Agreement, Headwaters granted to Executive an award to receive up to 25,000 shares of
Headwaters common stock, contingent on the future performance of Headwaters (Performance Stock Award).

Headwaters and
Executive wish to cancel the Performance Stock Award.

AGREEMENT

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Headwaters and Executive agree as follows:

Headwaters and Executive hereby agree to cancel the Performance Stock Award. Executive hereby releases all right, title, claim, and interest in the
Performance Stock Award and the parties hereby amend the Employment Agreement by deleting section 2(D) in its entirety.

Headwaters will
rely upon Executives agreement to cancel the Performance Stock Award and release of all rights related thereto.

Headwaters makes no
promise, express or implied, that Headwaters will grant any substitute Performance Stock Award or other equity incentive compensation as consideration for the cancelled Performance Stock Award.

This Agreement has no effect upon any other incentive compensation award or the Employment Agreement, except the Performance Stock Award referenced
above. All other terms of Employment Agreement remain unchanged.

Signatures on next page.



1



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above
written.



|                        |  |                       |  |  |  |                   
|----------------------- |  | --------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------
|HEADWATERS INCORPORATED |  |                       |  | 
|                        |  |                       | 
|                        |  | /s/ Steven G. Stewart |  |  |  | /s/ Kirk A. Benson
|Name:                   |  | Steven G. Stewart     |  |  |  | Kirk A. Benson    
|Title:                  |  | CFO                   |  |  |  |                   



2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 20-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF LANA L.RUPPRECHT FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FrL10E3 c0 , AUG 1 8 2020 C.,,,,tenwood Ittof Sqprerna Court iDW ontana eF9

Lana L. Rupprecht has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana pursuant to Rule V ofthe'Rules for Admission,Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Rupprecht has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirernents as set foith by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Lana L. Rupprecht may be sworn in to the practice oflaw in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this 

## f r" day ofAugust,2020.

ChiefJustice 08/18/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005

### -1 A4 Justices.
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/28/18

 Southern District of Ohio

Terri Long

3:17-CV-336

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Joint Motion for Remand, doc. 13 is Granted; case is Remanded to the Commissioner under sentence four

of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) for further proceedings; case is terminated in the docket of this Court.

✔ Michael J. Newman