alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00618]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Route 66 Solar Energy Center, LLC..........  EG22-1-000
Cypress Creek Fund 7 Tenant, LLC...........  EG22 EG22-2-000
Cypress Creek Fund 6 Tenant, LLC...........  EG22 EG22-3-000
Cypress Creek Fund 5 Tenant, LLC...........  EG22 EG22-4-000
CCP-PL Lessee, LLC.........................  EG22 EG22-5-000
Hecate Energy Highland LLC.................  EG22 EG22-6-000
EnerSmart Chula Vista BESS LLC.............  EG22 EG22-7-000
Sagebrush Line, LLC........................  EG22 EG22-8-000
PGR 2021 Lessee 2, LLC.....................  EG22 EG22-9-000
Beulah Solar, LLC..........................  EG22 EG22-10-000
Ellis Solar, LLC...........................  EG22 EG22-11-000
King Creek Wind Farm 1 LLC.................  EG22 EG22-12-000
King Creek Wind Farm 2 LLC.................  EG22 EG22-13-000
Calhoun Solar Energy LLC...................  EG22 EG22-14-000
ENGIE 2020 ProjectCo-NH1 LLC...............  EG22 EG22-15-000
Dunns Bridge Solar Center, LLC.............  EG22 EG22-16-000
Jackson Generation, LLC....................  EG22 EG22-17-000
MPH AL Pierce, LLC.........................  EG22 EG22-18-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of December 2021, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became 
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 
366.7(a)(2021).

    Dated: January 7, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00618 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Amendment to the Advisory Agreement



 Exhibit 10.27 

Dated as of June 14, 2010 

Motricity, Inc. 

601
108th Avenue NE, Suite 900 

Bellevue, WA 98004 
  

			
	 Attention:
	  	 Ryan Wuerch, Chief Executive Officer
 Richard
Leigh, General Counsel


 Gentlemen: 

This letter agreement (the “Amendment”) amends our engagement letter agreement dated May 5, 2010 (the “Agreement”) between
Motricity, Inc. (the “Company”) and Advanced Equities, Inc. (“Advanced Equities”). Terms not defined in this Amendment have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. 

Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety by replacing Section 2 with the following: 

“Section 2. Compensation. The Company agrees to pay Advanced Equities a one-time fee of $2,000,000, all of which has been earned and accrued
as of the date hereof and which shall be paid to Advanced Equities upon consummation of the Transaction. All such fees that have been previously paid to Advanced Equities prior to the consummation of the Transaction shall be refunded by Advanced
Equities to the Company and no such fees shall be payable by the Company unless the Transaction is consummated (the parties agree that such prior payments total $1,400,000).” 

Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety by replacing Section 5 of the Agreement with the following: 

“Section 5. Termination. This Engagement will continue until the earlier of the consummation of a Transaction or other termination as provided
below. The Company may terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, by giving 30 days written notice to Advanced Equities; provided, however, that no such termination will affect the matters set out in this section or under the
captions “Confidentiality,” “Use of Information,” “Certain Acknowledgments and Agreements,” “Indemnity,” “Governing Law,” “Miscellaneous” and “Compensation” to the extent any
amounts are accrued or otherwise due thereunder at the time of termination. In the event that this Agreement or the Transaction is terminated by the Company, then Advanced Equities shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company for its actual
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with its services under the Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, in no event shall Advanced Equities be entitled to aggregate fees in excess of $2.0 million under this Agreement.” 







 Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Please confirm that the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding by signing and returning to us the enclosed duplicate of this Amendment. 

Very truly yours, 

ADVANCED EQUITIES SECURITIES LLC 
  

			
		
	 By:
	 	  

		 	 Shannon Soqui

Head of Investment Banking – West Coast



Accepted and agreed to as of the date set forth above: 

Motricity, Inc. 
  

			
		
	 By:
	 	  

		 	 Ryan Wuerch

Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-67371, 333-76724, 333-96919, 333-121829 and 333-142143), on Form S-4 (File No. 333-140067) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-39674, 333-39676, 333-39678, 333-103527, 333-113704, 333-124803, and 333-147599) ofHeadwaters Incorporated of our reports dated November 19, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Headwaters Incorporated and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Headwaters Incorporatedincluded in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2008. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Salt Lake City, Utah 

November 19, 2008
Exhibit






    
Exhibit 10.1
Execution Copy
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Fourth Amendment”), made as of this 1st day of October 2015, is entered into by and between The KEYW Corporation, a Maryland corporation with its principal place of business at 7740 Milestone Parkway, Suite 150, Hanover, MD 21076 (the “Company”) and Mark A. Willard (the “Employee”).  
WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated June 16, 2010, as amended on March 12, 2012, June 29, 2012 and May 27, 2015 (collectively the “Employment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, Employee wishes to resign as President and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company; 
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to retain the Employee as Executive Vice President of the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Company and Employee mutually wish to amend the Employment Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Fourth Amendment, the parties agree:
1.  Section 2.1 is amended by deleting the words “President and Chief Executive Officer” and replacing them with the words “Executive Vice President.”
2.  Capitalized terms used in this Fourth Amendment shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Employment Agreement unless otherwise provided in this Fourth Amendment.
3.  All definitions, terms, and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect for the duration of the Employment Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fourth Amendment as of the day and year set forth above.  THE KEYW CORPORATION:






By:  /s/ Philip L. Calamia                    
Name: Philip L. Calamia
Title: Chief Financial Officer


EMPLOYEE:




 /s/ Mark A. Willard                             
Mark A. Willard
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 447 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 447

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    expand the definition of firefighter to include apprentices and 
            trainees, regardless of age or duty limitations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2009

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    expand the definition of firefighter to include apprentices and 
            trainees, regardless of age or duty limitations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Christopher Kangas 
Fallen Firefighter Fairness Act''.
    (b) Findings.--Congress finds that--
            (1) approximately 50 percent of all firefighters start out 
        as junior firefighters;
            (2) Christopher Kangas was a 14-year-old full member of the 
        Brookhaven, Pennsylvania Volunteer Fire Department who 
        tragically died when he was hit by a car while he was 
        responding on his bicycle to a fire alarm; and
            (3) because of his age, however, he is not recognized under 
        the Public Safety Officer's Death Benefit Act nor was he 
        considered eligible to have his name added to the National 
        Fallen Firefighter's Memorial in Emmitsburg, Maryland.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF APPRENTICES AND TRAINEES IN DEFINITION OF 
              FIREFIGHTER.

    Section 1204(4) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(4)) is amended by inserting ``, regardless of 
age, status as an apprentice or trainee, or duty restrictions imposed 
because of age or status as an apprentice or trainee,'' after ``fire 
department''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall apply with respect to deaths 
and injuries which occur on or after May 4, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

September 16, 2020

Order 

Clerk

September 16, 2020

161836(69)

PENNIE MARIE DAVIS, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

SC: 161836 

v COA: 344203 

Jackson CC: 16-000344-CZ 

JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time 

for filing her answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before September 22, 2020.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated October 8, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-206697) of Smart Trust, Dorsey
Wright International Momentum Trust, Series 1.


 


	 	/s/
    Grant Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 8, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Initiatives Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark  Clancy,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.
A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  U.S.  Energy  Initiatives Corporation and will be retained by U.S.
Energy  Initiatives  Corporation  and  furnished  to the Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

August  17,  2006

/s/  Mark  Clancy
---------------------------
Mark  Clancy
Chief  Executive  Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
MOHAMAD JABRINI, > Case No. 1:17-CV-629
Petitioner, : Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz
vs.

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.,
Respondents.
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 2)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United
States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate
Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on September 22, 2017,
submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 2). No objections were filed.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all
of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its
entirety.

Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2) is ADOPTED;

2. The Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice;


3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED;

4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this Order would not be taken
in good faith; and

5. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is
TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: _ t te
Timothy S. B

United States

istrict Judge
TS

- 11KK 6F , Part 1, Section C, Question 3, Material Safety Data Sheet

Date Printed: 9/16/2011 Page 1 of 1 

## Redacted
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

JOHN COOPER,

Petitioner, 

v.

WARDEN, PICKAWAY

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:18-cv-28

JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE

Magistrate Judge Merz

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s July 2, 2020, 

Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 25). The Magistrate Judge recommends 

that the Court DISMISS Cooper’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) 

WITH PREJUDICE. The R&R advised both parties that a failure to object within 

the 14 days specified by the R&R may result in forfeiture of rights on appeal, which 

includes the right to District Court review. (See Doc. 25, #335). See also Thomas v. 

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting 

§ 636(b)(1)(C), intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to 

which no objections are filed.”); Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 

2019) (noting “fail[ure] to file an objection to the magistrate judge’s R & R ... is 

forfeiture, not waiver”) (emphasis in original); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The time for 

filing objections has passed and none have been filed. 

Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and 

DISMISSES Cooper’s Petition (Doc. 1) WITH PREJUDICE. As reasonable jurists 

Case: 1:18-cv-00028-DRC-MRM Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/16/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 342
2 

could not disagree with this conclusion, Cooper is denied a certificate of appealability 

and the Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively 

frivolous.

SO ORDERED. 

September 16, 2020 

DATE DOUGLAS R. COLE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 1:18-cv-00028-DRC-MRM Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/16/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 343
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2020-E-1817, FDA-2020-E-1818, and FDA-2020-E-1820]


Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
Extension; ENHERTU; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) published 
a notice in the Federal Register of November 1, 2021, for the 
determination of a regulatory review period for purposes of patent 
extension for the human biological product, ENHERTU. This document 
corrects that notice by adjusting the applicable regulatory review 
period for the testing phase and approval phase of the product, 
ENHERTU.

DATES: All due dates for submission of comments, redetermination 
requests, and submission of petitions for due diligence as well as the 
dates used to determine the regulatory review periods for the products 
noted above remain the same as originally published.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory 
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 1, 2021, the Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA or the Agency) published a notice in the Federal 
Register determining the regulatory review period for the human 
biological product ENHERTU. This correction to the notice adjusts the 
applicable regulatory review period of the product with the number of 
days occurring during the testing phase and the approval phase of the 
product ENHERTU.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 1, 2021 (86 FR 60252), in FR 
Doc. 2021-23725, appearing on page 60253, in the third column, in 
section II., ``Determination of Regulatory Review Period,'' in the 
first two sentences, the following correction is made:
    FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
ENHERTU is 1,395 days. Of this time, 114 days occurred during the 
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,281 days 
occurred during the approval phase.

    Dated: January 5, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00404 Filed 1-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-07621)
pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1995 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and the LCA-Vision Inc.
Directors Nondiscretionary Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-74485) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1998 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, of our
reports dated March 8, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
of LCA-Vision Inc., LCA-Vision Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of LCA-Vision Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2004. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio

March 14, 2005 52
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4454 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4454

To amend the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 to require the 
  Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission to make a preliminary report no 
                       later than June 15, 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2010

Mr. Stearns (for himself and Mr. Israel) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 to require the 
  Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission to make a preliminary report no 
                       later than June 15, 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRELIMINARY REPORT OF THE COMMISSION.

    Section 5 of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ``a report'' and 
        inserting ``the reports required''; and
            (2) in subsection (h)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) 
                as paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), respectively;
                    (B) by amending the heading of paragraph (1) to 
                read as follows: ``Final report''; and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following 
                new paragraph:
            ``(2) Preliminary report.--Not later than June 15, 2010, 
        the Commission shall submit to the President and to the 
        Congress a report containing the preliminary findings and 
        conclusions of the Commission on the causes of the current 
        financial and economic crisis in the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10QSB
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001107699
<NAME> PAGELAB NETWORK, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,945
<PP&E>                                          42,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 257,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,045,465
<OTHER-SE>                                   (994,668)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   257,098
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           15,689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,016
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (278,295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (278,295)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (278,295)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>