alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

ANJUM A. QURESHI, et al.,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:18-cv-27

vs.

INDIAN RIVER TRANSPORT, et al., Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent Case)

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This civil consent case is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to enforce the settlement 

agreement entered into by the parties. Doc 25. As the motion suggests, it appears that Plaintiffs,

Anjum A. Qureshi and Anna Quershi, have accepted monies to settle this case, but have declined 

to sign the settlement agreement provided to them by Defendants’ counsel. Id. The Court hereby 

schedules a hearing on this motion for July 16, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. The court ORDERS both Anjum 

A. Qureshi and Anna Qureshi to appear at the hearing, and advises that their failure to do so may 

result in sanctions, including but not limited to contempt. At the hearing, both sides will be given 

an opportunity to present oral argument and introduce any and all evidence they deem appropriate. 

If this matter is resolved prior to July 16 by the signing of the settlement or otherwise, counsel 

shall contact Diane Marcus at 937-512-1641 and so advise. Plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED to 

serve a copy of this order upon Anjum Qureshi and Anna Qureshi. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: June 20, 2019 s/ Michael J. Newman 

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
YEAR END 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          14,421
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,027
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,090
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    136,078
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          30,676
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            31,151
<LOANS>                                        239,257
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 445,166
<DEPOSITS>                                     382,696
<SHORT-TERM>                                       214
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,573
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,180
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,482
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 445,166
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 21,691
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,096
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,041
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                31,828
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,917
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,928
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,900
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      624
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 188
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,389
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,389
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.75
<LOANS-NON>                                         28
<LOANS-PAST>                                       550
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    373
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,438
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      638
<RECOVERIES>                                       255
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,679
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,679
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,887
        

</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

April 15, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00269-CR

IN RE JASON RAY BOUCHARD, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1374815

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 4, 2014, relator Jason Ray Bouchard filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel his appointed defense 

attorney and the State’s attorney to provide relator copies of any documents filed 

with this Court in his related appeal. 

Our mandamus jurisdiction is limited. By statute, we have authority to issue 

a writ of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in our court of 
2

appeals district, and as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. 

Gov’t Code § 22.221. Relator does not identify as a respondent a judge of a district 

or county court. Nor is issuance of the writ against either of the named respondents 

necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Therefore, we have no jurisdiction to grant 

the requested relief.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB  Reliant Home Warranty
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, L.
Val Guilis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  herby certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his/her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:                                       /s/ Val Guilis
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                Val Guilis
                                                Chief Financial Officer

                                          November 15, 2005

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00024

- CV

I N THE INTEREST OF P.Y.M. , A Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 00373

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, 1 Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

We GRANT Viola C.’s attorney’s motion to withdraw.

No costs will be assessed against the app ellants because they are INDIGENT.

SIGNED August 7, 2013.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

1 This case was assigned to the 224th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas, in which the Honorable Cathleen

M. Stryker is the presiding judge. However, the case was tried by and the final order was signed by the Honorable

Charles E. Montemayor, Ass ociate Judge, appointed pursuant to section 201.201 of the Texas Family Code. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 201.201, et seq. (West Supp. 2012).
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

WILLIAM ROBERT DIXON, 

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:17-cv-363 

- vs - District Judge Walter Herbert Rice 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

EDWARD SHELDON, Warden, 

 Mansfield Correctional Institution, 

 : 

 Respondent. 

TRANSFER ORDER 

 

 This is a habeas corpus case brought pro se by Petitioner William Robert Dixon to 

challenge his convictions in the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court for complicity to 

aggravated robbery, aggravated burglary, and felonious assault with a firearm specification 

(Petition, ECF No. 1, ¶5, PageID 1). Mr. Dixon initially filed this case in the Northern District 

of Ohio, but it was transferred here by District Judge James Gwin (ECF No. 5). 

 Upon examination of the electronic records of this Court, the Magistrate Judge finds that 

Dixon has previously filed habeas corpus application in this Court challenging the same 

conviction. In Case No. 3:11-cv-150 on recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael Newman 

(ECF No. 19), District Judge Thomas Rose dismissed the Petition with prejudice; Dixon’s appeal 

was unsuccessful. In Case No. 3:13-cv-103, the undersigned recommended dismissal because 

the Petition there was a second or successive habeas application with no permission to proceed 

from the circuit court. Judge Rose adopted that recommendation without any objection and 
2 

dismissed the case without prejudice to a refiling if circuit court approval were to be obtained 

(ECF No. 8). Dixon took no appeal. 

 Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (Pub. L. No 104-132, 

110 Stat. 1214)(the "AEDPA") as codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), a second or successive habeas 

application challenging the same state court judgment cannot proceed without permission of the 

circuit court. Without that permission, the District Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the case. 

Franklin v. Jenkins, 839 F.3d 465(6th Cir. 2016); Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147 (2007). Mr. 

Dixon has presented no evidence he has permission to proceed. 

 When a habeas petitioner inappropriately files a second-or-successive petition in District 

Court, we are required to transfer the case to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. In re Sims, 111 

F.3d 45 (6th Cir. 1997).\ 

 Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals 

for consideration under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). 

October 16, 2017. 

 s/ Michael R. Merz

 United States Magistrate Judge
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 23.1  CONSENT OF MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP  

                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Rocky Mountain Internet, Inc.
Denver, Colorado

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 
Registration Statement of Rocky Mountain Internet, Inc. (the "Company") filed 
January 7, 1997 of our report dated February 23, 1996 relating to the 
financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 1995 
appearing in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Rocky 
Mountain Internet, Inc.

We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in 
such Registration statement.

                                            /S/McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
April 17, 1997

                                       6
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Yacov Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as disclosed in
          Part I Item 1 to this report; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


  /s/ YACOV KAUFMAN
------------------------------------
Yacov Kaufman
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003



                                     - 28 -
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4425 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 394
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4425

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 18, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, as the ``Martin G. `Marty' 
                          Mahar Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARTIN G. ``MARTY'' MAHAR POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Martin G. `Marty' Mahar Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Martin G. 
`Marty' Mahar Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 394

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4425

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, as the ``Martin G. `Marty' 
                          Mahar Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 18, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
1

 We also note that the trial court has certified, and the record confirms, that this is a plea bargain

case and Isaac has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00633-CR

Mark Isaac, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3041211, HONORABLE BRENDA KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Mark Isaac seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for possession of a

controlled substance. Sentence was imposed on July 19, 2004. There was no motion for new trial.

The deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore August 18, 2004. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A

pro se notice of appeal was filed on September 15, 2004. Under the circumstances, we lack

jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of

jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918

S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).1
2

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 28, 2004

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 31.1



MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE & EQUITY, LLCCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Michael L. Falcone, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC;                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   | 
|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|   | 
|3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.                       
|   | 

Date: March 25, 2014

| |                                                 |  |  | 
| | ----------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
| | /s/ Michael L. Falcone                          | 
| | Michael L. Falcone                              | 
| | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         March 18, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Melissa H. Nagelin, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 208-R, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7951,                         *nagelinmh2@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 6, 2022.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2022-00429 Filed 1-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4508 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 

Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2010 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small Business Act and the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AU4 THORIZATION OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE 

5 SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSI6 NESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 

8 Act to extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4508 IH

1 Business Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 

2 (Public Law 109–316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most recently 

3 amended by section 1 of Public Law 111–89 (123 Stat. 

4 2975), is amended by striking ‘‘January 31, 2010’’ each 

5 place it appears and inserting ‘‘April 30, 2010’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 30, 2010. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS