alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4201 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4201

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the special rule 
         for contributions of book inventory to public schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 3, 2009

 Mr. Cuellar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the special rule 
         for contributions of book inventory to public schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL RULE FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF BOOK 
              INVENTORY TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

    (a) In General.--Clause (iv) of section 170(e)(3)(D) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 
2009'' and inserting ``December 31, 2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

VONDA BARNETT, : Case No. 3:17-cv-434
Plaintiff, : District Judge Walter H. Rice
: Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
vs. :

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of
Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
(Doc. #11). Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees
in the amount of $3,500.00 in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims
Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. The award of attorney fees will
satisfy all of Plaintiff's claims for fees, costs, and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in
this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and not her attorney, and can be offset to
satisfy pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States under Astrue v. Ratliff,
130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010).

After the court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that
Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the

award be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly


signed by Plaintiff and counsel.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

Ls The Parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney’s Fees under
the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #11) is accepted and the
Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees, costs, and expenses
in the total amount of $3,500.00;

N

Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this
Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing

debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing
debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to
Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by
Plaintiff and counsel; and

5: The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: JF-f 2-4 B iA > oxGe

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
In the United States District Court

FOR the Southern District of Ohio

Eastern Division

Anass Nazih, etaly

On behalfofhimselfandall others

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

V.

Cafe Istanbul ofColumbus, LLC, etal..

Defendants.

Case No. 2:17-cv-947

Judge Algenon L. Mabrley

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

Protective ORDER

Pursuant to this Court's Order granting conditional certification of an FLSA collective

action, opt-in Plaintiffs are hereby permitted to file their consent to join forms in this case

anonymously, in redacted form, such that their identities will not be released to the public.

Plaintiffs' Counsel is directed to file two versions of each opt-in PlaintifPs consent form. The

first version of the consent to join form will be filed under seal with the Court, and Plaintiffs are

hereby granted leave to file such consent to join forms under seal. The second version of the

consent to join form will replace each opt-in Plaintiffs name with a pseudonym (such as

"Plaintiff 3, Plaintiff 4, Plaintiff 5...), willremove any other identifying information, and will be

filed with the Court. Plaintiffs' Counsel is then required to disclose the identity of each opt-in

Plaintiffs to Defendants' attorney.
Defendants, their attorney, and his office staff are prohibited from disclosing the

identities or any identifying information, including but not limited to telephone number, address,

employment status, immigration status, and names offamily members, of any opt-in Plaintiff to

thegeneral public or any third parties, including government agencies.

Any document orcommunication bearing any identifying information relating to any optin Plaintiff will be marked and considered "confidential," and should not be shared with anyone

outside of the parties and their counsel.

Any written discovery Defendants wish to conduct with respect to an opt-in Plaintiffshall

be done using the pseudonym identifiers with the opt-in form filed with the Court. Any

depositions or other discovery will be confidential. No discovery or other materials bearing

identifying information forany opt-in Plaintiffshall be filed withthe Courtexcept underseal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

This 22dayof Oclober, 2018

MAGISTRATEJUDGE EUZABETH PRESTON DEAVERS
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Qiong
      (Laby) Wu, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the year ended June 30, 2007,
      of Sinoenergy Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.


Dated:
                  August 10, 2007
                
                /s/ Qiong (Laby) WuQiong
                    (Laby) Wu
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
1/ifcs. DEPARTMENT oF TRANSPORTATIONRECEfVEO 

,-, ,.., ~'' '• . 

j ,UE'IEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION MAY ... 7 2013 

HEARING DOCKET 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

j: 33 WASHINGTON, DC 

In the Matter of: FAA DOCKET No. FAA-2013-0040 

Martinaire Aviation LLC FAA Case No.2011SW700189 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Respondent 

JUDGE GOODWIN 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040 

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION 

To: Mr. Michael L. Dworkin, Esquire 

Michael L. Dworkin and Associates 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, California 94104 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Complainant, Federal Aviation 

Administration will take the oral deposition of the persons 

specified below, at the dates, times, and place specified for 

all purposes permitted by the Rules of Practice, Part 13, 

Subpart G, of the Federal Aviation Regulations, 14 CFR § 13.220 

( j) . 

DEPONENT: Alan S. Rusinowitz, 9:00 a.m. May 22, 2013 

Central Standard Time. 

The undersigned will take the discovery depositions of the 

above-named deponents before a court reporter in the city of 

Fort Worth, Texas on the 22nd day of May 2013. The depositions 

will begin at 9:00 a.m. and continue until finished. The 

deposition will take place at the Federal Aviation 

Administration, Southwest Region, Office of Regional Counsel, 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 674, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. You are 

required to be present and ready at the dates, time, and place 

for oral examination. 
·• 

Respectfully submitted this 6th day of May 2013. 

ERIC E. ANDERSON 

Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Re: Martinaire Aviation, LLC, FAA Case No. 2011SW700189 

I hereby certify that on this date, I have sent via Federal 

Express a true copy of the Notice of Deposition addressed as 

follows to: 

Mr. Michael L. Dworkin and Associates 

Law Offices 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, California 94104-1808 

(FAX and Federal Express) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

(Original plus one copy) 

(Federal Express) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: 1-202-366-7536 

(FAX and Federal Express) 

ERIC E. ANDERSON 

Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

Archier, Agency 

(817) 222-5074 

' 

3 

Dated: May 6, 2013
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
4.1

    


    June 11,
2010

    


    Wegener
Communications, Inc.

    11350
Technology Circle

    Johns
Creek, Georgia  30097

    


    Re:  Thirteenth
Amendment

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    Wegener Communications, Inc., a Georgia
corporation (“Borrower”), and The David E.
Chymiak Trust Dated December 15, 1999 (“Trust”), as assignee of the
Bank of America, N.A., successor
interest by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, respecting a $4,000,000
Loan and Security Agreement (“Security Agreement”), which
Security Agreement has been previously amended twelve times, wish to further
amend the Security Agreement as provided herein (the “Thirteenth
Amendment”).

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing recitals, the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Borrower and the Trust hereby agree as
follows:

    


    Provision
A. 7 of the Twelfth Amendment is deleted in its entirety and the following is
substituted in its place:

     

    7.           Solvency
Representation.  Borrower’s obligations under paragraph 10(p) of the
Security Agreement shall be suspended until the last day of Borrower’s 2010
fiscal fourth quarter ending on September 3, 2010.  Thereafter, such
suspension shall end and Borrower’s full compliance with such obligations shall
be required.

    


    Except as expressly amended hereby, the
Security Agreement, as amended, are ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto
and remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms
thereof.  In the event there is any conflict between the provisions of
this Thirteenth Amendment and those in the Security Agreement generally, the
provisions of this Thirteenth Amendment shall control in all
respects.

    


    


    [SIGNATURE
PAGE FOLLOWS]

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    THE DAVID E. CHYMIAK TRUST DATED DECEMBER
15, 1999

    


    


    By:  /s/  David E.
Chymiak

    Name:  David E. Chymiak

    Title:
Trustee

    Accepted
and agreed to this

    11th day
of June, 2010.

    


    


    


    WEGENER
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

    


    


    


    By:  /s/ C. Troy Woodbury,
Jr.

    Name:    C. Troy Woodbury,
Jr.

    Title:
CEO

    Accepted
and agreed to this

    11th day
of June, 2010

    


    


    By:  /s/
James
Traicoff

    Name:   James Traicoff

    Title:
Treasurer and CFO

    Accepted
and agreed to this

    11th day
of June, 2010

     

     

    
      	
              Consented and agreed
      to by the following guarantor of the obligations of Wegener Communications, Inc.
      to The David E. Chymiak Trust Dated December 15,
    1999.

            	 


    

     

    WEGENER
CORPORATION

    


    


    By:  /s/ C. Troy Woodbury,
Jr.

    Name:   C. Troy Woodbury,
Jr.

    Title:
President and CEO

    Date:
June 11, 2010
Mleridith Berk ; ; i ( r ' :n7J:0N 

5014 College View Ave. 

Los Angeles, CA 90041 

Regarding: FAA-2009-0773 

I just read about this regulation regarding allowing pilots to fly while 

under the influence of antidepressants including Zoloft, Prozac, Celexa 

and Lexapro. These drugs all have a "Boxed Warning" by the FDA 

which includes the possibilities of "suicide, aggressive behavior and 

acting without thinking". This may not occur in every case. However, 

this occurs frequently enough to have the FDA put this high level 

warning on the drugs. This should not be downplayed. It is real. The 

FDA is very reluctant to issue such warnings and only does so when it 

is absolutely necessary. 

Please see the quote below from the FDA Medline Plus, National 

Institute of Health website. 

It would be a far better idea to hire pilots who are not depressed and 

even find a way of actually making the depressed pilots feel better. 

"You should know that your mental health may change in unexpected ways when you take 

fluoxetine or other antidepressants even if you are an adult over 24 years of age. You may 

become suicidal, especially at the beginning of your treatment and any time that your dose is 

increased or decreased. You, your family, or your caregiver should call your doctor right away if 

you experience any of the following symptoms: new or worsening depression; thinking about 

harming or killing yourself, or planning or trying to do so; extreme worry; agitation; panic 

attacks; difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep; aggressive behavior; irritability; acting 

without thinking; severe restlessness; and frenzied abnormal excitement. Be sure that your 

family or caregiver knows which symptoms may be serious so they can call the doctor if you are 

unable to seek treatment on your own." 

I would appreciate your looking into this matter for a better solution, 

don't believe anyone should be discriminated against. However, I 

certainly would not want a surgeon operating on me if they had any 

disability or disorder or were taking a medication that would prevent 

them from doing the best possible job. We are talking about such a 

life and death situation when it comes to flying a plane. 

Thank you,
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4360 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4360

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 26 (legislative day, March 25), 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs blind rehabilitation 
center in Long Beach, California, as the ``Major Charles Robert Soltes, 
Jr., O.D. Department of Veterans Affairs Blind Rehabilitation Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS BLIND REHABILITATION 
              CENTER, LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs blind rehabilitation center in 
Long Beach, California, shall after the date of the enactment of this 
Act be known and designated as the ``Major Charles Robert Soltes, Jr., 
O.D. Department of Veterans Affairs Blind Rehabilitation Center''. Any 
reference to such blind rehabilitation center in any law, regulation, 
map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the ``Major Charles Robert Soltes, Jr., 
O.D. Department of Veterans Affairs Blind Rehabilitation Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 25, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform andInvestor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted) (theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D., the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Molecular Devices Corporation (the “Company”), and Timothy A.Harkness, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifiesthat, to his knowledge:
1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the“Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of thefiscal year covered by the Annual Report and results of operations of theCompany for the fiscal year covered by the Annual Report.
     This Certification accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Dated: March 16, 2005   /s/ Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D. /s/ Timothy A. Harkness Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D. Timothy A. HarknessChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4396 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4396

  To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that greenhouse gases are not 
              subject to the Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

 Mr. Pomeroy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that greenhouse gases are not 
              subject to the Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Our Energy Jobs Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDING AND SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that on April 2, 2007, the United 
States Supreme Court, in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection 
Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), found that the Environmental Protection 
Agency has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas 
emissions.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that:
            (1) When Congress passed the Clean Air Act, it did not 
        intend to regulate greenhouse gases under such Act.
            (2) The Environmental Protection Agency should not have the 
        authority to promulgate rules to regulate greenhouse gas 
        emissions without being provided explicit authority to do so by 
        Congress.
            (3) Should the Environmental Protection Agency promulgate 
        rules that regulate greenhouse gas emissions, such regulations 
        will have a significant impact on nearly all aspects of the 
        economy of the United States. Regulations that have the 
        potential to impact such a large portion of the economy should 
        not be left to administrative rulemaking in the absence of 
        congressional action.
            (4) Comprehensive regulations to address global climate 
        change must only be enacted--
                    (A) at the direction of Congress; and
                    (B) if Congress specifically intends such 
                regulations to be implemented.

SEC. 3. GREENHOUSE GAS REGULATION UNDER CLEAN AIR ACT.

    Section 302(g) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7602(g)) is amended 
by adding the following at the end thereof: ``The term `air pollutant' 
shall not include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, 
hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, or sulfur hexafluoride.''.
                                 <all>
```