alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Data Systems & Software
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Yacov Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:






(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.






**/s/** Yacov
      Kaufman


Yacov
      Kaufman


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      15, 2005
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Southern District of Ohio

RICHARD CASILLO )
Plaintiff )
v. ) Case No. 1:17-cv-746
APPLE COMPUTER INC. d/b/a APPLE INC. )
Defendant )
APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record
1am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and | appear in this case as counsel for:

Plaintiff, Richard Casillo

Date: __06/27/2018 __

—“Aitorn

Jonathan T. Deters (# 0093976)

Printed name and bar number

Schroeder, Maundrell Baribere & Powers
5300 Socialville-Foster Road, Suite 200
Mason, Ohio 45040

Address

jdeters@smbplaw.com

E-mail address

(513) 583-4204

Telephone number

(513) 583-4203

FAX number


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was filed on June 27", 2018, using the Clerk

of Court’s electronic filing system, which will send notice of such filing to all parties and counsel
of record,

/s/Jonathan T. Deters
Jonathan T. Deters (#0093976)
IN THE MONTANA SUPREME COURT No. DA 21-0137

___________________________________________________ _______________ STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. SHELBY BRYAN RAGNER, Defendant and Appellant.

___________________________________________________ _______________ ORDER

___________________________________________________ _______________ On motion of appellant, good cause appearing, and with no objection from the State, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Appellant is granted an e xtension of time until April 1, 2022, in which to prepare, file , and serve his opening brief in this matter. DATED: ________________________

__________________________ Chief Justice

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 16 2022

02/16/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0137
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the Quarterly Report of JCP&L Transition Funding LLC
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.





                                  /s/Charles E. Jones
                              --------------------------------
                                     Charles E. Jones
                                         President
                                  (Chief Executive Officer)
                                    November 14, 2003



                                  /s/Richard H. Marsh
                              --------------------------------
                                     Richard H. Marsh
                                 Senior Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                     November 14, 2003


                                         14
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 DANIEL J. VILLA,

3 Petitioner-Appellant,

4 v. NO. 33,880

5 NANCY MOLINA,

6 Respondent-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY

8 Daniel Viramontes, District Judge 

9 DeLaney & Hernandez, LLC

10 Amy C. DeLaney-Hernandez

11 Deming, NM 

12 for Appellant

13 Couture Law

14 Rosalie Fragoso

15 Albuquerque, NM 

16 for Appellee

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 VANZI, Judge.
2

1 {1} Petitioner appeals from a district court order dismissing his petition for custody

2 of his minor child. We issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm. Respondent filed

3 a memorandum in support; Petitioner has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and

4 the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, we

5 affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246,

6 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of

7 the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).

8 {2} AFFIRMED.

9 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 __________________________________

11 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

12 WE CONCUR:

13 _________________________________

14 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

15 _________________________________

16 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.6


          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


In connection with the annual report of Acetex Corporation ("Acetex") on Form
40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Brooke N. Wade,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Acetex, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Acetex.



"Brooke N. Wade"
--------------------------------------------
Name:  Brooke N. Wade
Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

March 29, 2005
Filed by OTC Filings Inc. - www.otcedgar.com - 1-866-832-FILE (3453) - Yanex Gorup, Inc. - Exhibit 10.23

 
  	 1                 

	              


 
  	  2                

	              


 
  	 3                 

	              


 
  	 4                 

	              


 
  	 5
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290, Registration No. 333-52907,
Registration No. 333-83007 and Registration No. 333-55470) of Tollgrade
Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated January 19, 2001,
relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 19, 2001
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 23, 2001
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Greg Abbott, in his Official Capacity as Governor of The State of
Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00440

- CV

Trial court case number: 21

- DCV

- 286148

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

On August 13, 2021, Relator Greg Abbott , in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus challeng ing a temporary restraining order signe d by the trial court on August 12, 2021. In conjunction with the mandamus petition, relator filed an emergency motion requesting a temporary stay of the temporary restraining order pending our determination on the petition.
On August 1 5 , 2021, the Texas S upreme Court issued orders granting relator’s request s for emergency stays pending the C ourt’s determination of relator’s mandamus petitions filed with the Texas Supreme Court challenging similar temporary restraining orders issued in Dallas and Bexar Coun ties. See In re Greg Abbott, In His Official Capacity as Governor of The State of Texas , No. 21

- 0686 (Dallas County); In re Greg Abbott, In His Official Capacity as Governor of The State of
Texas , No. 21

- 068 7 (Bexar County ).
In light of the stay orders issued by the Texas Supreme Court, relator’s request for a stay in this case is granted

. T he stay does not affect the August 19, 2021 hearing on the temporary injunction

. The mandamus petition remains pending.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Sarah B. Landau

_______

Acting Individually

Date: __ August 16, 2021

___
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 60 ) IV-C-2

6 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:54 AM Sheet 60of 232F"\2 _ 

## M 1 9 

## 08 8

Honorabl e Nick Joe Rahal l lous e o f Representative s Washington / D . c . 2051 5 Dear Wr . Rahall i Than k yo u fo r passin

g alon g th e comment s o f Hr * Charli o Blackburn , Vic e President , Blackbur nFor d Sales , Inc. , concernin

g BPA' s proposa l to require onboar d refuelin

g emissio

n controls * B e assure d tha t thes e comment s wil l b e considere

d i n th e next phas e o f our rulemakin g process . W

e wil l als o b

e placin g the m i nth e publi c docke t fo r th e rulemaking . Than k yo u agai nfo

r you r concer

ni n thi s matter . Sincerel y

yours , ORIGINA L SGWD J RICHAR D D . WSQ H Richar d 0 . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s oe tDocke tA-87-lll / Prepare d by:PCarlson:ECTD:8-374-8270:AL-88005 1 bcc i Regio

n3 Administrato r Deput y Administrator Externa l Affairs/Mr . Edward s Congressiona l Liaiso n

•
Exhibit 31(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                18 U.S.C. Section 1350

               UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arnie Geller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of RMS TITANIC, Inc., the
registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I, along with the CFO, am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. I, along with the CFO, have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


Date: June 14, 2004



/s/ Arnie Geller
-----------------
Arnie Geller,
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Eric J. Sandman, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Globix Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controlover financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statementsfor external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
#### Johnston *v.*Widener.

5-947

289 S. W. 2d 520

Opinion delivered April 23, 1956.

*Kirsch, Cathey*& *Broivn,*for appellant.

*Foster Clarke*and *Penix*& *Penix,*for appellee.

Sam Eobinson, Associate Justice.

The appellant, Shirley Johnston, was granted a divorce from the appel-lee, Sylvia Johnston, now Sylvia Widener, in the Craig-head Chancery Court on December 31, 1949. By agreement, the father, Shirley, was given custody of the three children. Later, Sylvia married Widener, and lives in Chicago with her husband. On March 3, 1954, she filed, a petition in the Arkansas court where the divorce was granted, alleging changed conditions, and asked that she be given custody of the children. Three children are involved: Donna Jean, at that time seven years of age; Shirley, age fourteen; and Walter Eay, age twelve. The mother’s petition was granted by the chancellor to the extent of awarding her the custody of the youngest girl, Donna Jean. The father, Shirley, who works in St. Louis, had placed the children with his father and mother who live in Arkansas, and they were allowed to retain custody of the two older children. On appeal, *Johnston*v. *Widener,*225 Ark. 453, 283 S. W. 2d 151, this court held that the father and his parents should be allowed to retain custody of all three children, but said further: “The appellee [Sylvia] shall have at all times the right of reasonable visitation. She will have to win back, if she can, the affection and respect of the children.” On remand, the parties were unable to agree as to what would constitute “reasonable visitation,” and it'became *286necessary for the chancellor to decide, that point. The chancellor reached the conclusión that the mother should he permitted to have all three children with her in Chicago during the months of June and October each year; the school attended by the children is hot in session during those months. It was further provided that the mother should make bond to return the children as directed. The father, Shirley, has appealed, contending that the chancellor has given the mother custody of the children for part time, which is not in accordance with the reasonable visitation privilege granted by this court.

At the hearing in the Chancery Court on the mother’s petition for custody of the children, it has shown rather conclusively that she was not allowed to see the children at all except under the most difficult circumstances; that she had been accorded no privacy with the children, and, by reason of having been denied a normal relationship with the children, she had lost their affection to some extent. This court suggested that the mother should endeavor to win back the affection of the children, and the trial court was justified in reaching the conclusion that this could be done only by the children being with the mother, as indicated. In these circumstances, we cannot say that the trial court’s order is anything other than a grant to the mother of reasonable visitation privileges.

Affirmed.
CAUSE NO. 2014-50657 

ELSA RODRIGUEZ

 Plaintiff,

§

§

IN THE DISTRICT COURT

V.

§

§

§

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

MARTIN, DISIERE, JEFFERSON, 

and WISDOM,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

 

 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

PLAINTIFF ELSA RODRIGUEZ’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

 TO THE HONORABLE CHRIS DANIEL, DISTRICT CLERK OF 

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS: 

 Plaintiff, Elsa Rodriguez, under Tex. R. App. P. 25.1, gives notice of appeal 

to the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals sitting in Houston, Texas from the 

Honorable Judge Stone’s Order and Amended Order granting the Defendant’s 

Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Texas Civil Practices & Remedies 

Code, and judgment dismissing all of Plaintiff’s claims signed June 10, 2015, as 

well as any and all rulings or orders adverse to the Plaintiff. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 WATTS &COMPANY LAWYERS, LTD 

 

/S/ Larry Watts 

 Larry Watts 

 SBN 20981000 

 P.O. Box 2214 

 Missouri City, Texas 77459 

 Telephone: (281) 431-1500 

 Facsimile: (877) 797-4055 

 Email: wattstrial@gmail.com 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

6/10/2015 6:55:33 PM

Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County

Envelope No. 5630269

By: Phyllis Washington

Filed: 6/10/2015 6:55:33 PM

ACCEPTED

01-15-00531-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/2/2015 1:08:23 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/2/2015 1:08:23 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Larry Watts, certify that a true and correct copy of this document has been 

served on opposing counsel via efiling on this, the 10th of June, 2015.

Chris Daniel

District Clerk Harris County

P.O Box 4651

Houston, Texas 77210-4651

Main Office: (713)755-7300

Christopher A. Prine

Clerk of the Court

First Court of Appeals

301 Fannin ST

Harris, TX 77002-2066

(713)274-2700

Fax: (713)755-8131

Richard A. Morris

Rogers, Morris, & Grover

5718 Westheimer Road, Suite 1200

Houston, TX 77057

(713)960-6000

Fax: (713)960-6025

/S/ Larry Watts

Larry Watts
Motion Granted and Order filed April 12, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00818-CR

____________

JESUS F. MORALES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1399181

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has filed a motion to review the record 

so he may prepare a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous 

v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 239th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that 

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before April 27, 2016; that the 
clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant 

is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that 

date.

PER CURIAM