alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4387 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building located at 100 North 

Palafox Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Winston 

E. Arnow Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4387 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building located at 100 North Palafox 

3 Street in Pensacola, Florida, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow Federal Building’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

9 a reference to the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow Federal Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4387 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building located at 100 

the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow Federal Building’’. North Palafox Street in Pensacola, Florida, as
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  JCP&L  Transition  Funding  LLC
("Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
H. Marsh,  Senior Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





                                        /s/Richard H. Marsh
                                  ----------------------------------
                                           Richard H. Marsh
                                       Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                              May 9, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
OSullivan Industries, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OSullivan
Industries, Inc.

|      |              |  |                                      
|----- | ------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: | May 14, 2004 |  | /s/ Richard D. Davidson              
|      |              |  |                                      
|      |              |  | Richard D. Davidson                  
|      |              |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This
certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such
Act, be deemed to be filed by OSullivan Industries, Inc. for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
OSullivan Industries, Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
OSullivan Industries, Inc. and will be retained by OSullivan Industries, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Subjex Corporation does hereby certify that:

(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Subjex Corporation for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Subjex Corporation



|                   |                                     |                     | 
|------------------ | ----------------------------------- | ------------------- | 
|Date: May 19, 2009 | By:                                 | /s/ ANDREW D. HYDER | 
|                   | Andrew D. Hyder                     |                    
|                   | President & Chief Executive Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          51,200
<SECURITIES>                                   668,967
<RECEIVABLES>                                  742,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,747)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          12,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,545,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           444
<OTHER-SE>                                     407,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,545,798
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               427,830
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               127,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,043
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                177,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                    71,341
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            106,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.40
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T h e H o n o r ab le G le n n L . A r c h e r , J r ., S e n io rU n ite dS ta te s C ir c u it ** Judge f orthe F e de r a l C i r c ui t , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS FO R TH E N I N TH C I R C U I T
S UN DA I NG , P et i t i on er , v. E R IC H . H O L D E R Jr. , A tt orn ey G e n e r al , R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 70210 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 585- 118 ME MORA ND UM *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d and S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 15, 2010 S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: KOZ I NS KI , C h ie f Ju d g e , A R C H ER , S eni or C i rc ui tJudg e, and ** CA L L AH AN , C i rc ui tJudg e. W h e th e rD a in g s u f

f e r s f r o m am e n ta l im p a irm e n t th a t e x c u s e s h is u n tim e ly a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n is ad is p u te df a c tu a l q u e s tio n o v e rw h ic h w e la c kju r is d ic tio n . S e e R a m a d an v . G o n z a le s , 4 7 9 F .3 d6 4 6 , 6 5 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . 

# FI LED APR30 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSpage 2

A s s e s s in g th e s e v e r ityo f D a in g ’s d e p r e s s io n in v o lv e s a n u n r e v ie w ab le det erm i nat i on “ depend ent. . . up on the i dent i ty of the pers on . ” I d. at65 6 (i nt ernal quot a t i on m arks om i tt e d) ( a l t e r a t i on i n or i gi na l ) . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on ove rthe d en i al o f th e m o t i o n t o reo p en b ecau se i tp ert ai n s t o th e m eri t s o f th i s p rev i o u sl ym a de di s c r e t i onaryde t e rm i na t i on. S e e F e rnande z v. G onz a l e s , 439 F . 3d 592, 603 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the B I A ’ s de ni a l of the appl i c a t i on f

or w i thh ol di ng of re m ov albecause D ai ng di dn ’ tdem on strat e al i kel i ho od of future pe r s e c ut i on. E ve n i f

w e a s s um e tha tD a i ng s uf f e r e d pa s tpe r s e c ut i on a s ac hi l d, the gove rnm e ntha s r e butt e d the pr e s um pt i on ba s e d on tha tpe r s e c ut i on by de m ons tr a t i ng a“ f

unda m e nt a l c ha nge i n c i r c um s t anc e s . ” H annav. K e i s l e r , 506 F . 3d 93 3, 93 8 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). T he i m m i grat i on j ud ge re as on abl y f ou nd that

“ coun trycond i t i on s have qui t e obv i ou sl y c hang ed and chang ed t o such a ra di ca l degree that[D ai ng ’ s] experi ence s [ pre- 19 79 ] prov i de no basi s f or a w el l -f

ou nd ed f e a ro f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n .” D a in g ’s u n p le a s an t e x p e r ie n c e s p o s t- 1 9 7 9 d o n ’t r is e to the l evelof pers ec ut i on , and there fore do n’ tes t abl i sh a pre sum pt i on of future pe r s e c ut i on. D I SM I SSED I N PA R T A N D D EN I ED I N PA R T.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6189

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

THOMAS JERMAINE ROBINSON, a/k/a Tony, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:05-cr-00667-TLW-1) 

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Thomas Jermaine Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Brereton 

Barbier, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South 

Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Thomas Jermaine Robinson appeals the district court’s 

judgment reducing his sentence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 

35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district 

court. See United States v. Robinson, No. 4:05-cr-00667-TLW-1 

(D.S.C. filed Jan. 27, 2009 & entered Jan. 28, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Polly Penhale, ACA Permit Officer, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-8030; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8dccceccfde8ffe0e4f9fecde3feeba3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f1e1c1e2f3a2d32362b2c1f312c3971383029">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 26, 2021, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. The permit was issued on January 03, 2022, to:

Permit No. 2022-025

1. Dr. Kim Bernard

Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022-00441 Filed 1-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Syndication Net.com,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Mrutyunjaya S. Chittavajhula., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   May 23, 2005

                                        /s/ Mrutyunjaya S. Chittavajhula.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mrutyunjaya S. Chittavajhula.
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1



                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-31414) pertaining to the registration of 6,553,341 shares of common
stock; the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-40230) pertaining to the
United Shipping & Technology, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan; the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-30228 and 333-06269) pertaining to the United
Shipping & Technology, Inc. 1996 Director Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Stock
Option Plan; and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-34411) pertaining
to the registration of 1,538,474 shares of common stock, Inc. of our report
dated September 25, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of United Shipping & Technology, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended July 1, 2000.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 25, 2000
Case: 1:17-cv-00749-TSB Doc #: 7 Filed: 11/09/17 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 59
Case: 1:17-cv-00749-TSB Doc #: 7 Filed: 11/09/17 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 60
# National Human Trafficking Prevention Month, 2022

Human trafficking—whether in the form of forced labor, sex trafficking, or other offenses—is an abhorrent abuse of power and a profoundly immoral crime that strikes at the safety, health, and dignity of millions of people worldwide. During National Human Trafficking Prevention Month, we reaffirm our commitment to protect and empower survivors of all forms of human trafficking, to prosecute traffickers, and to bring an end to human trafficking in the United States and around the world.

                        My Administration is committed to stopping human trafficking wherever it occurs. This month, we released the updated                         *National Action Plan to Combat Human Trafficking*                        —a whole-of-government approach to combating human trafficking in the United States and abroad. The plan links anti-trafficking initiatives to our wider efforts to counter illicit financing; advance gender and racial equity; expand the rights and dignity of working people; and promote safe, orderly, and humane migration.                    

My Administration is also dedicated to ensuring that our justice system holds accountable any individuals or entities engaged in this horrendous crime—and that our domestic and global economic systems offer no safe harbor to forced labor or other abuses. In addition to helping survivors on their road to recovery, we must also learn from their expertise in order to better detect trafficking crimes that are often hidden in plain sight, bring perpetrators to justice, and improve our prevention efforts. Since human trafficking disproportionately impacts racial and ethnic minorities, women and girls, LGBTQI+ individuals, vulnerable migrants, and other historically marginalized and underserved communities, our mission to combat human trafficking must always be connected to our broader efforts to advance equity and justice across our society.

During National Human Trafficking Prevention Month, let us resolve to counter injustice and fortify our commitment to pursue dignity and freedom for all people. The National Human Trafficking Hotline (1-888-373-7888) is an important resource to report a tip or ask for help.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 2022 as National Human Trafficking Prevention Month. I call upon businesses, civil society organizations, communities of faith, families, and all Americans to recognize the vital role we play in combating human trafficking, and to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities aimed at preventing all forms of human trafficking.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-sixth.

[FR Doc. 2022-00162

Billing code 3395-F2-P
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

No. 16-3366 

(D.C. Nos. 5:16-CV-04018-JAR, 

5:07-CR-40031-JAR-1) 

(D. Kan.) 

v. 

DONNELL FRANCIS TIMLEY, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

ORDER DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 

AND DISMISSING THE APPEAL

Before BRISCOE, HARTZ, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges. 

 Mr. Donnell Timley is a federal inmate who filed a motion to vacate 

his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In the motion, Mr. Timley presented 

constitutional challenges to his sentence. The district court dismissed the 

§ 2255 motion on two grounds: (1) It was untimely, and (2) Mr. Timley 

waived the right to collaterally attack his sentence. 

 Mr. Timley wants to appeal. To do so, he seeks a certificate of 

appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (certificate of appealability), 1915(a)(1) (leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis). 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

April 21, 2017

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

We can issue a certificate of appealability only if the underlying 

rulings on timeliness and waiver were at least reasonably debatable. See 

Laurson v. Leyba, 507 F.3d 1230, 1232 (10th Cir. 2007) (holding that when 

the district court denies a habeas petition based on timeliness, the court of 

appeals can issue a certificate of appealability only if the district court’s 

ruling on timeliness is at least reasonably debatable).

In seeking a certificate of appealability, Mr. Timley reurges the 

merits of his underlying claims. But he does not address the timeliness of 

his § 2255 motion or say why he thinks the district court erred in finding a 

waiver through the plea agreement. Though Mr. Timley is pro se, we 

cannot craft arguments for him. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer, 

425 F.3d 836, 840 (10th Cir. 2005). 

Because Mr. Timley does not question the district court’s reasons for 

dismissing the § 2255 motion, we deny a certificate of appealability. As a 

result, we must dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). And in 

the absence of a reasonably debatable appeal point, we deny Mr. Timley’s 

request to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Rolland 

v. Primesource Staffing, L.L.C., 497 F.3d 1077, 1079 (10th Cir. 2007). 

 Entered for the Court 

 Robert E. Bacharach 

 Circuit Judge
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-88568, 333-31414, and 333-34411); the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-85606) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 1996
Director Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Stock Option Plan, and certain
1999/2000/2001 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements; the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-40230) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan; and the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-30228 and 333-06269) pertaining to
the 1996 Director Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Stock Option Plan, of our
report dated September 4, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Velocity Express Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended June 29, 2002.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                       Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 23, 2002