alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ToddC. Emerson, #8175 

444 South River Road 

St. George, Utah, 84790 

Telephone: (435)634-3530 

Facsimile: (435)634-3505 

Email: temerson@skywest.com 

- and -

Michael L. Dworkin #64047 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415)421-02500 

Facsimile: (415)421-2560 

Email: law@avialex.com 

Attorneys for SkyWesl Airlines, Inc. 

IJ"PARTM[;MT OF 

:r^ANSPORTATION 

• If •k'i-'TnpcDArir-.f lo •X.:KU OPERA: ilKl d 

M-^i\] !3 P |: 5!5 ECfcsVED 

HEARING DOCKET 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

FAA Case No. 2011NM060033 

DMS No. FAA-2011-0779 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC'S 

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY 

OF COUNSEL 

Judge: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. (hereinafter referred to as "SKYWEST"), by and through 

its undersigned counsel, respectfully submits this Notice of Unavailability of Counsel. 

Although this consolidated matter has not yet been set for hearing, in the interest of 
scheduling a hearing on dales upon which SKYWEST's counsel will be available, it is requested 

that the hearing not be set on any of the following dates: 

April 24-26, 2012; 

May 5-11,2012; 

May 20-25, 2012; 

July 14-August3,2012; 

August 25-September 14, 2012; 

September 25, 2012; 

October 10,2012; 

October 24-26, 2012; and 

November 1-15,2012. 

Respe^fuUy submitted 

MICHAEL L. DWORKIN 

Co-Counsel for SkylVest Airlines 

Dated: February 6, 2012 

2011NM060033/DMS No. FAA-2011-0779 

Sky West's Notice of Unavailability of Counsel 

Page 2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 6th day of February, 2012, a true and correct 

copy of the foregoing SKYWEST'S NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL was 

served as follows: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-

320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

{Federal Express} 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2WI000 

{Federal Express) 

Jeffrey M. Harper 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057 

FAX (425)227-1007 

(Facsimile and Federal Express} 

2011NM060033/DMSNO. FAA-20! 1-0779 

SkyWest's Notice of Unavailability of Counsel 

Page 3
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 100 (Friday, May 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29759-29760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12020]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9015-1]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 05/12/2014 Through 05/16/2014
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140150, Final EIS, NMFS, AK, Steller Sea Lion Protection 
Measures for Groundfish Fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian 
Islands Management Area, Review Period Ends: 06/23/2014, Contact: 
Gretchen Harrington, 907-586-7228.
EIS No. 20140151, Draft EIS, USFWS, VA, Chincoteague and Wallops Island 
National Wildlife Refuges Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan, 
Comment Period Ends: 07/15/2014, Contact: Thomas Bonetti 413-253-8307.
EIS No. 20140152, Final EIS, FERC, ME, Downeast Liquefied Natural Gas 
(LNG) Project, Review Period Ends: 06/23/2014, Contact: Shannon Crosley 
202-502-8853.
EIS No. 20140153, Draft EIS, NPS, NC, Cape Lookout National Seashore 
Off-Road Vehicle Management Plan, Comment Period Ends: 07/21/2014, 
Contact: Michael B. Edwards 303-969-2694.
AMENDED NOTICES
EIS No. 20140147, Draft EIS, USFS, CA, Rim Fire Recovery, Comment 
Period Ends: 06/16/2014, Contact: Maria Benech 209-532-3671, Revision 
to FR Notice Published 05/16/2014; Correction to reduce comment period 
from 06/30/2014 to 06/16/2014 reflecting the President's Council on 
Environmental Quality (CEQ) alternative arrangement granted in 
accordance with 40 CFR 1506.11 on December 9, 2013. Among these 
alternative arrangements, CEQ specifically approved shortening the 
public comment for this DEIS from 45 to 30 days.

[[Page 29760]]

    Dated: May 20, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-12020 Filed 5-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4588 

To provide that the detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba remains open indefinitely and to require that individuals detained 

at the facility be tried only by military commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2010 

Mr. ROONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that the detention facility at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba remains open indefinitely and to require that individuals detained at the facility be tried 

only by military commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Detainee Trials at 

5 Gitmo Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4588 IH

1 SEC. 2. DETENTION FACILITY AT NAVAL STATION, GUANTA2 NAMO BAY, CUBA TO REMAIN OPEN AND RE3 QUIREMENT THAT INDIVIDUALS DETAINED 

4 AT THAT FACILITY BE TRIED ONLY BY MILI5 TARY COMMISSION. 

6 (a) DETENTION FACILITY.—The detention facility at 

7 Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba shall remain in 

8 use indefinitely by the United States as a detention facil9 ity. 

10 (b) TRIAL BY MILITARY COMMISSION.—Any indi11 vidual who is detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo 

12 Bay, Cuba, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, 

13 may only be tried by military commission under chapter 

14 47A of title 10, United States Code. Any trial of such an 

15 individual by military commission shall be conducted at 

16 Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                      COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY ADVISORS LLC
                          18 CORPORATE WOODS BOULEVARD
                                   THIRD FLOOR
                             ALBANY, NEW YORK 12211
                    PHONE (518) 462-2632 O FAX (518) 462-3045

As of February 1, 2003

Globix Corporation
139 Centre Street

New York, New York 20191
Attention:   Peter K. Stevenson
             President and CEO

Dear Peter:

         Reference is made to the letter agreement dated April 19, 2002 (the
"Agreement") by and between Globix Corporation and CTA, pursuant to which Globix
has engaged CTA to act as a consultant to Globix, as extended by that certain
letter agreement dated as of November 1, 2002. This letter shall set forth the
agreement of Globix and CTA to extend the Agreement for an additional
three-month period beginning on February 1, 2003 and ending on April 30, 2003.
Globix and CTA agree that, except as extended as set forth in this paragraph,
all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.

         If the foregoing comports with your understanding of the agreement
between Globix and CTA with respect to the subject matter hereof, kindly sign
this letter agreement in the space provided below and fax it back to me at
518-462-3045.

         CTA looks forward to our continued association with Globix.

Very truly yours,



Wayne Barr, Jr.
Senior Vice President and General Counsel

Accepted and agreed to as of this
1st day of February, 2003.

Globix Corporation

By:    /S/ PETER K. STEVENSON
       ----------------------
       Peter K. Stevenson
       President and CEO
Exhibit 4 (i)

 

 

March 7, 2003

 

Securities andExchange Commission

450 Fifth Street,N.W.

Washington, D.C.20549

Subject:   General Electric Capital Services, Inc.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2002 - File No. 0-14804

Dear Sirs:

Neither General Electric Capital Services, Inc. (the"Corporation") nor any of its subsidiaries has outstanding anyinstrument with respect to its long-term debt that is not registered or filedwith the Commission and under which the total amount of securities authorizedexceeds 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on aconsolidated basis. In accordance with paragraph (b) (4) (iii) of Item 601 ofRegulation S-K (17 CFR §229.601), the Corporation hereby agrees to furnish tothe Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrumentwhich defines the rights of holders of such long-term debt.

Very truly yours,

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.

 

By: /s/ J.A.Parke                          
       J.A. Parke,

       Vice Chairman and

       Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No’s. 333-74610, 333-59843, 333-37111, 333-49350,333-52598) of Zoran Corporation our report dated January 30, 2002 relating tothe financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|--------------------------------|
| San Jose, California           |
|                           |
| March 29, 2002                 |

 

 

----
Inthe Matter of 

## SERVEDJUNE 6, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

Docket No. FAA-2010-0620 DIAMOND AIR CHARTER, INC. ) ) ) ) ) Respondent (CP10EA0004)
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OFFIFTHLITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE OnMay 1, 2012 an Order Granting Continuance and Setting FifthLitigation Scheduling Conference was filed. On June 1, 2012 the FAA filed a Motion for Postponement ofthe Fifth Litigation Scheduling Conference setfor June 7, 2012 at 9:30am Eastern standardtime (EST). The FAA cited multiple grounds for the Motion, and noted thatthe Respondenthad no objectionto the Motion. From June I, 2012 throughJune 5, 2012 the Office ofHearings (OH) clerical staff made multiple telephone calls to bothparties to determine whatthree dates/times the parties were recommending for a rescheduled conference. OnJune 5, 2012 the parties recommendedJuly 9, 2012 at 1:30pmEST. The OH clerical staffconsulted with the undersigned, and then orally confirmed with the parties that July 9, 2012 at 1:30pm ESTwas an acceptable date. Afterreviewing all relevantpleadings, motions, caselaw, regulation, statutory authority, andbeing fully advised; ItIs Hereby Ordered: 1. The FAA's Motion·-for Postponement oftheFifthLitigation Schedttling Conference is granted. 2. The Fifth Litigation Scheduling Conference is continued from June 7, 2012 at9:30am ESTto July 9, 2012 at 1:30pm. The Office ofHearings shall initiatethe conference call.

Attachment

- Service ListFAA Docket No. CP 1 OEA0004 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC:·430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 1 ONE COPY Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel Aviation Law Experts One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 TEL: 301-294-8550 FAX: 301-294-2525Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, EAL-7

Federal Aviation Administration 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699

The Honorable J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Nicole Avant, :

:

Plaintiff(s), :

: Case Number: 1:18cv79

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

University of Cincinnati, :

:

Defendant(s). :

ORDER

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been

settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action (including all claims by all parties) is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown

not later than August 7, 2018, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties

may substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement upon approval of the

Court. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce a settlement should be

aware of Kokkonen v Guardian Life Ins. Co. Of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994), and

incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

This Court explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached by

the parties.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court
Order entered April 27, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01221-CR

TRAVONTE MARTIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-16957-V

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 23, 2020 second motion for extension

of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief due on or 

before May 26, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
ATTACHMENT C

OMB CONTROL NO. 2070-0027

Display Related to OMB Control #2070-0027 - Listings of

Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1

As of May 10, 1993, the OMB approval numbers for EPA regulations in Chapter I of Title

40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) appear in a listing in 40 CFR 9.1 (58 FR 27472). 

This listing fulfills the display requirements in section 3507(f) of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(PRA) for EPA regulations. The listing at 40 CFR 9.1 displays this OMB Control number for the

following regulations:

Program Title 40 CFR citation

Statements of Enforcement Policies and Interpretations ................................................... 168.65

 ................................................... 168.75

 ................................................... 168.85
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nelson Flores, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 578]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leventhal, J.), rendered July 17, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Photographs of victims may be admitted “to illustrate, elucidate or corroborate other evidence offered or to be offered at the trial” *(People v Stevens,*76 NY2d 833, 835 [1990]). Here, the crime scene photographs corroborated the testimony of the People’s witnesses concerning the proximity of the victim’s body to the corner of the kitchen and to blood and skull fragments on the wall, and showed the murder weapon lying next to the victim’s body. Thus, they were relevant to the issue of intent and the defendant’s contention that he acted in self-defense.

*503The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in admitting the autopsy photographs into evidence. It was unnecessary to admit the autopsy photographs to illustrate the medical examiner’s testimony. However, the evidence of the defendant’s guilt was overwhelming, and error, if any, is deemed harmless.

The defendant’s remaining contentions raised in his supplemental pro se brief either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. and its subsidiarieson Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-107005, 333-39974, 333-33760, 333-80691, 333-28435, 333-20925) of our report dated February 24, 2004, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2003. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Raleigh, NC 

February 24, 2004
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 0 9

- 3006

_____________
JEWISH HOME OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondents

_________ ___ On Petition for Review from on Order by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

(No. 09

- 42)

Submitted January 27, 2011

Before: FUENTES, CHAGARES, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

.

____________

ORDER

____________

On the Court’s own motion, this Court’s mandate issued on June 16, 2011 is

hereby RECALLED. The parties’ motions to publish, filed on August 31, 2011 and

February 8, 2012, are hereby GRANTED , and thi s Court’s not precedential opinion

, filed

February 11 , 2011

, is hereby VACATED

. An amended precedential opinion sha ll be

filed forthwith

. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate upon the filing of the amended

precedential opinion./s/ Michael A. Chagares Circuit Judge

DATED: August 14, 2012 trg/cc: Christopher S. Lucas, Esq.

Alan C. Horowitz, Esq.
#### People v Belton,

No. 90887;

Court of Appeals No. 121150.
Case: 2:17-cv-01085-GCS-EPD Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 157
Case: 2:17-cv-01085-GCS-EPD Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 2 of 8 PAGEID #: 158
Case: 2:17-cv-01085-GCS-EPD Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 3 of 8 PAGEID #: 159
Case: 2:17-cv-01085-GCS-EPD Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 4 of 8 PAGEID #: 160
Case: 2:17-cv-01085-GCS-EPD Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 5 of 8 PAGEID #: 161
Case: 2:17-cv-01085-GCS-EPD Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 6 of 8 PAGEID #: 162
Case: 2:17-cv-01085-GCS-EPD Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 7 of 8 PAGEID #: 163
Case: 2:17-cv-01085-GCS-EPD Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 12/14/17 Page: 8 of 8 PAGEID #: 164
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Monty D. Murphy, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:17cv138 

United States of America, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendant. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed 

by the Magistrate Judge on October 19, 2018 (Doc. 20). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file 

objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. 

Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R 

(Doc. 20) have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 20) of the Magistrate Judge is 

hereby ADOPTED. The defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 18) 

is GRANTED. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge 

United States District Court
# Alaska De p artment of Fish and Game

A DF&G Home » Fishing » Commercial 

# Commercial Fisheries Fisheries by Area

Quick Links News Releases & Announcements Licenses/Permits Regulations e-Library Jobs
Scientific and Technical Publications A laska Board of Fisheries Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission A laska Seafood Marketing Institute Older News Releases Prior to May 31, 2011 A laska’s commercial fisheries are diverse, valuable, harvest a variety of finfish and shellfish species, and include both large and small vessels. Catcher processors over 300 feet in length operate in the Bering Sea pollock fishery while open skiffs of 20 feet fish for salmon, herring, and halibut close to shore. In between all sizes and configurations of vessels work their respective fishing grounds. A laska’s largest and most valuable fisheries target salmon, pollock, crab, herring, halibut, shrimp, sablefish, and Pacific cod. The total value of Alaska’s commercial fisheries is $1.5 billion to the fishermen; with a wholesale value of $3.6 billion. Economists have estimated the seafood industry to contribute $5.8 billion and 78,500 jobs to the Alaskan economy. Fisheries management in Alaska is based on scientific assessments and monitoring of harvested populations and is regarded as a model of successful natural resource stewardship. » Learn More

Adobe Acrobat PDF files require a free viewer available directly from Adobe
. 2012 Upper Cook Inlet Sockeye Salmon Forecast ( PDF 129 kB ) 2012 Bristol Bay Sockeye Salmon Forecast ( PDF 154 kB ) 2012 Nushagak Chinook Salmon Harvest Projection ( PDF 123 kB ) 2012 Togiak Herring Forecast ( PDF 207 kB ) 

## Page 1 of 1 Commercial Fisheries, Alaska Department of Fish and Game

11/23/2011 htt p ://www.adf g .alaska. g ov/index.cfm?adf g =fishin g Commercial.main
NO. 07-07-0078-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 9, 2007

______________________________

ERASMO GONZALES, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 69 DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAM COUNTY; TH

NO. 3320-7; HON. RON ENNS, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Dismissal

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Erasmo Gonzales (appellant) appeals an order denying his “Motion for Judicial

Notice” signed by the trial court this year. We dismiss the cause for want of jurisdiction.

As revealed by the allegations and argument in his pro se appellant’s brief, appellant

has used his purported request for the trial court to take judicial notice as a means of

attacking the validity or legality of his 1996 conviction. Yet, that conviction became final

both many years ago and many years before appellant filed his 2007 notice of appeal.
2

TEX. R.APP.P. 26(a) (requiring an appellant to file his notice of appeal within 30 or 90 days

of the date the trial court sentenced him in open court).

Moreover, even if we were to interpret the motion to take judicial notice as effort to

initiate a habeas proceeding under art. 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,

that would not change the outcome. Those proceedings are commenced in the Court of

Criminal Appeals, and intermediate appellate courts, such as ours, have no authority to act

on them. Parr v. State, 206 S.W.3d 143, 145 (Tex. App.–Waco 2006, no pet.) (holding that

intermediate appellate courts have no jurisdiction over art. 11.07 proceedings).

In sum, we have no jurisdiction over the substance of appellant’s complaints, and

having no such jurisdiction, we have no choice but to dismiss the appeal. Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (obligating an intermediate appellate court

to dismiss the appeal if it lacks jurisdiction). So, it is dismissed. 

Brian Quinn

 Chief Justice

Do not publish.