alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Paygard, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/Graham Newall
 Date: April 19, 2004                           ----------------
                                                  Graham Newall
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                                  /s/Colin Gervaise-Brazier
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  Colin Gervaise-Brazier
                                                  President
Exhibit 10.23

 

Offsetting-Agreement

 

between

 

EverFine Industrial Gorp.
 10E-3, No. 270, Sec 4, Chung Hsiao E. Rd.
 106 Taipei, Taiwan

 

hereinafter called „Efco”

 

and

 

congatec AG 
 Auwiesenstr. 5 
 94469 Deggendorf 
 GERMANY

 

hereinafter called „congatec”

 

1.                                      Background and Purpose of this Agreement

 

Under the Logistics Agreement dated March 10, 2009, Efco delivers and sells to congatec computer-modules for resale by congatec. Congatec delivers and sells to Efco certain parts for usage in the manufacture of congatec computer-modules. Per the Agreement on Payment Terms between both parties of July 1, 2010, standard payment term for invoices of both parties for both kinds of transactions is 45 days, net. In general, Efco’s receivables balance from congatec is higher than congatec’s receivable balance from Efco.

 

The Purpose of this Agreement is to determine the way of settling the invoices of both parties through an offsetting procedure.

 

2.                                      Offsetting procedure

 

Both parties agree that their invoices shall not be settled individually. At the end of each month, congatec will deduct its receivables balance (from invoices to Efco) from congatec’s payable to Efco as of the same date. At the end of each month, congatec declares (and Efco accepts) the offsetting of congatec’s receivables due vis-à-vis Efco. The remaining net balance to Efco shall be settled by congatec within the respective due dates of the remaining invoices.

 

 

	
Deggendorf, December 8,   2010
    	
Taipei,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Alex Petrak
    	
 
    	
/s/ Kao Mei Hui
    
	
Congatec AG
    	
 
    	
EverFine Industrial   Corp.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60691

Conference Calendar

DEMARIO DONTEZ WALKER

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MISSISSIPPI PAROLE BOARD; DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LORA COLE;

CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS; CHIEF RECORDS OFFICER GLORIA GIBB

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:08-CV-132

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Demario Dontez Walker, Mississippi state prisoner # L1625, appeals from

the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted. In his complaint, he argued that

(1) his due process rights were violated by the revocation of his parole and the

loss of his street-time credit and (2) MISS. CODE ANN. § 47-7-27, which governs

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60691

2

the procedure for parole revocation, was unconstitutional. As relief, Walker

sought reinstatement of his term of parole and the restoration of his street-time

credit.

Because success in Walker’s action “would necessarily demonstrate the

invalidity of confinement or its duration[,]” a § 1983 action is barred, and his

claims must be brought in a habeas corpus petition. Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544

U.S. 74, 82 (2005). The district court properly declined to construe Walker’s

complaint as a habeas petition because Walker failed to exhaust his state

remedies. The district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim was therefore

proper. See Harris v. Hegmann, 198 F.3d 153, 156 (5th Cir. 1999).

Walker’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). It is therefore dismissed. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2. Walker has already been informed that he has accumulated three

strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Walker v. Norwood, No. 3:08-cv-275-TSL-JCS,

2009 WL 387337, at *1 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 13, 2009). Walker is no longer able to

proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). In order to avoid the imposition of an

additional sanction, Walker should review any pending appeals and actions and

move to dismiss any that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4248 

To repeal the legal tender laws, to prohibit taxation on certain coins and 

bullion, and to repeal superfluous sections related to coinage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2009 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and 

Means and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the legal tender laws, to prohibit taxation on 

certain coins and bullion, and to repeal superfluous sections related to coinage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Free Competition in 

5 Currency Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LEGAL TENDER LAWS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5103 of title 31, United 

8 States Code (relating to legal tender), is hereby repealed. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4248 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 for subchapter I of chapter 51 of title 31, United States 

3 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4 5103 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘5103. [Repealed]’’. 

5 SEC. 3. NO TAX ON CERTAIN COINS AND BULLION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law— 

8 (1) no tax may be imposed on (or with respect 

9 to the sale, exchange, or other disposition of) any 

10 coin, medal, token, or gold, silver, platinum, palla11 dium, or rhodium bullion, whether issued by a State, 

12 the United States, a foreign government, or any 

13 other person; and 

14 (2) no State may assess any tax or fee on any 

15 currency, or any other monetary instrument, which 

16 is used in the transaction of interstate commerce or 

17 commerce with a foreign country, and which is sub18 ject to the enjoyment of legal tender status under 

19 article I, section 10 of the United States Constitu20 tion. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

22 on December 31, 2009, but shall not apply to taxes or 

23 fees imposed before such date. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 4248 IH

1 SEC. 4. REPEAL OF SUPERFLUOUS SECTIONS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking sections 486 (relating to uttering 

4 coins of gold, silver, or other metal) and 489 (making or 

5 possessing likeness of coins). 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO TABLE OF SEC7 TIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 

8 25 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 

9 the items relating to the sections stricken by subsection 

10 (a). 

11 (c) SPECIAL RULE CONCERNING RETROACTIVE EF12 FECT.—Any prosecution under the sections stricken by 

13 subsection (a) shall abate upon the taking effect of this 

14 section. Any previous conviction under those sections shall 

15 be null and void. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
China Health Industries Holdings, Inc.: Exhibit 10.13 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Financial Management Agreement  

Party A: Harbin Humankind Biology Technology Co., Limited

Party B: Harbin Hongxiang Investment Guarantee Co., Ltd 


In order to enhance business cooperation between Party A and
Party B, both parties enter into the following terms on an equal,
mutual-beneficial and voluntary basis. 

I. Party A entrusts Party B to manage its fund up to
¥50,000,000 (CNY Fifty Million). 

II. The period of financial management agreed upon by the two
parties is from June 20, 2015 to June 19, 2016. 

III. Party A shall deposit the fund to the account designated
by Party B who is responsible for financial management. When the period of
financial management expires, Party B shall transfer the principal and proceeds
to Party A’s bank account which is opened by Party B. 

IV. The period of financial management is one year. The annual
rates of return is 10%. 

V. During the period of financial management, Party A would not
obtain the annual rates of return stipulated in Article IV if the following
cases happen, and shall bear the loss caused by terminating this Agreement
before it expires: 

(i) Party A terminates the Agreement before the period of
financial management expires. 

(ii) Party B terminates the Agreement when Party A could not
meet with the requirements in Article II. 

1




VI. In case of force majeure, Party B has the rights to cancel,
modify or achieve the above terms relating to financial management in other
methods and compensates Party A based on market rules. 

VII. This Agreement is subject to the related regulations of
National Policy. 

VIII. This Agreement is executed in three copies with the same
legal effect, among which two copies are held by Party B and one copy is held by
Party A. 

Party A: Harbin Humankind Biology Technology Co., Limited
(corporate seal affixed) 

/s/Kai Sun 
June 1, 2015 


Party B: Harbin Hongxiang Investment Guarantee Co., Ltd
(corporate seal affixed) 

/s/Lei Yu 
June 1, 2015 

2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE GUADALUPE CHAVEZ-LIMAS,

aka Jose “Pato” Chavez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10182

D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00755-DCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jose Guadalupe Chavez-Limas appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed

following his conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

MAR 09 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10182

Chavez-Limas contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable

because the district court failed to consider the age of his prior conviction under

United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez, 567 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2009). In light of the

totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the

sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608

F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2010) (emphasizing the limited scope of AmezcuaVasquez).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 /s/ Christopher J. Davino

Christopher J. DavinoPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2010/s/ John A. Stone

John A. StoneChief Financial OfficerMay 14, 2010
Exhibit 23.2



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
United Shipping & Technology, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-31414), Form S-8
(File No. 333-40230), Form S-8/A (File No. 333-30228), Form S-8 (File No.
333-06269) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-34411) of our report dated August 13,
1999, relating to the consolidated financial statements of United Shipping &
Technology, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1999 and for the year then
ended, which report appears in this July 1, 2000, annual report on Form 10-KSB
of United Shipping & Technology, Inc.


LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 25, 2000
Exhibit 99 (a)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the Form 10-K of National Bankshares, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2002, I, James G. Rakes, President and Chief Executive
Officer of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

        (2)the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.


/s/ James G. Rakes
---------------------------
James G. Rakes
Chairman
President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,
vs. Case No. 3:17CR203
CHRISTOPHER ONEAL DEARMOND, ‘ JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
Defendant.

PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER; TRIAL DATE AND OTHER DATES SET

Date of Scheduling Conference 1/5/2018
Jury Trial Date Tuesday, 2/20/2018
Final Pretrial Conference (by telephone) Monday, 2/12/2018 at 5:00 pm

Motion Filing Deadline

Oral and Evidentiary Motions 2/1/2018
Other Motions 2/5/2018
Discovery Cut-off 2/8/2018
Speedy Trial Deadline 2/22/2018
Discovery out — Plaintiff to Defendant by close of business, 1/12/2018
b Duos
January 8, 2018 WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-20925, 333-39974, 333-33760,333-80691, 333-28435 and 333-107005) of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. and its subsidiaries of our report dated January 25, 2002 relating to the consolidated statement of operations, of shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for theyear ended December 31, 2001, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

 

February 24, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Data Systems & Software Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002
as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Yacov  Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted pursuant to   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

(3)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(4)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/S/Yacov  Kaufman
-----------------
Yacov  Kaufman
Chief  Financial  Officer
August  13,  2002


                                      -19-
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Microware Systems Corporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos.333-11061 and 333-67253) on Form S-8 of Microware Systems Corporation of
our report dated April 23, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Microware Systems Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1998 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
March 31, 1999, which report appears in the March 31, 1999 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Microware Systems Corporation.

                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
June 25, 1999
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 700240

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### PARIS T. CARR Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________ Appea l from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Brian E. Kasprzyk, USMC R

. Convening Authority: C ommand ing General
, Third Marine Aircraft Wing, Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, San Diego , CA

. Staff Judge Advoc ate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel Wilbur Lee, USMC

. For Appellant : Lieutenant Colonel Richard D. Bellis s , USMCR

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 26 October 2017

_________________________ Before G LASER

- A LLEN , H UT CHISON , and S AYEGH , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code o f Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Cal Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 4th day of November , 2008.                                                                                                               
|   



| | CAL KANTONENCal KantonenChief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------

















---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION 

RICK E. NEWMAN : CASE NO. C-1-01-0067 

 Plaintiff : JUDGE HERMAN J. WEBER 

 -vs- : AMENDED NOTICE OF VIDEOTAPE 

 DEPOSITION OF KENNETH A. 

THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE : BROWN, M.D. 

COMPANY, et al. 

 : 

 Defendants 

* * * * * * * 

Please take notice Defendant, Mesa, Inc., through counsel, and pursuant to the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, will take the videotape deposition of Kenneth A. Brown, M.D., at the 

Sheraton Burlington Hotel and Conference Center, 870 Williston Road, Burlington, Vermont 

05403, on August 9, 2004 at 5:30 p.m., and continuing from day to day thereafter until 

completed. The deposition will be taken before a notary public for all purposes permitted by the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

 s/ Joseph T. Mordino

 JOHN C. SCOTT, #0029518 

 JOSEPH T. MORDINO, #0065001 

 Attorneys for Defendant, Mesa, Inc. 

 FAULKNER & TEPE, LLP 

 2200 Fourth & Vine Tower 

 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

 (513) 421-7500 

Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 106 Filed 06/10/2004 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 10, 2004, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: Beverly R. Storm, 600 Greenup Street, P.O. Box 472, Covington, KY 41012-0472 

and Scott R. Thomas, One Financial Way, Suite 312, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242. 

s/ Joseph T. Mordino 

 JOSEPH T. MORDINO 

Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 106 Filed 06/10/2004 Page 2 of 2
Case: 3:17-cv-00334-TMR Doc #: 14-12 Filed: 04/16/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 291
Case: 3:17-cv-00334-TMR Doc #: 14-12 Filed: 04/16/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 292
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 10, 2009 

p0603 

Order 

 

June 10, 2009 

137252 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137252 

 COA: 272688 

Macomb CC: 2005-002755-FC 

RICHARD DEAN HENSLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 22, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Xiong, 483 Mich ___ (Docket No. 135158, order entered April 17, 

2009).