alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

CAMERON PADGETT, │ Case No. 1:18-cv-00013-SJD

│

Plaintiff, │ Hon. Susan J. Dlott

│

v. │

│

NEVILLE G. PINTO, │

│

Defendant. │

│

STIPULATED ORDER WITHDRAWING DEFENDANT’S FED. R. CIV. P. 12(C) 

MOTIONS, DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLANTIFF’S CLAIMS AGAINST 

DEFENDANT IN DEFENDANT’S PERSONAL CAPACITY, AND CLARIFYING THAT 

PLAINTIFF IS SEEKING ONLY ATTORNEY’S FEES, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND 

DECLARATORY RELIEF FROM DEFENDANT IN DEFENDANT’S OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY

By stipulation of Cameron Padgett (“Plaintiff”) and Neville G. Pinto (“Defendant”), by 

and through their respective attorneys, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND 

DECREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Defendant’s two (2) motions for judgment on the pleadings which invoke Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(C) are withdrawn without prejudice. (Dockt. Nos. 10 and 11.)

2. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant in Defendant’s personal capacity are dismissed 

without prejudice.

3. Plaintiff is seeking only attorney’s fees, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief against 

Defendant in Defendant’s official capacity. Plaintiff is not seeking nominal, special, general, or 

punitive damages against Defendant in Defendant’s official capacity.
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Susan J. Dlott

District Court Judge

Dated: 

Approved as to Form and Content:

KOLENICH LAW OFFICE ISAAC, WILES, BURKHOLDER & TEETOR, LLC

/s/ James E. Kolenich /s/ Mark Landes

James E. Kolenich (#0077084) Mark Landes (#0027227)

9435 Waterstone Blvd. #140 2 Miranova Pl., Ste. 700

Cincinnati OH 45249 Columbus, OH 43215

(T): (513) 444-2150 (T): (614) 221-2121

(F): (586) 408-6384 (F): (614) 365-9516

(E): Jek318@gmail.com (E): mlandes@isaacwiles.com

Attorney for Cameron Padgett Attorney for Neville G. Pinto

Dated: March 2, 2018 Dated: February 27, 2018
#### Shiuh Chu Lu, Appellant, v Dan Conlon, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 508]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered on or about March 10, 2003, which, *143inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, deemed to be an appeal from the ensuing judgment, same court and Justice, entered March 31, 2003, dismissing the complaint, and, so considered, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The complaint was properly dismissed as barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel since plaintiffs present claims were fully and fairly litigated and determined against him in prior actions in Kings and Queens Counties *(see Buechel v Bain,*97 NY2d 295 [2001], *cert denied*535 US 1096 [2002]). The complaint, having been interposed more than three years subsequent to the running of the applicable three-year statutory period (CPLR 214), was also properly dismissed as time-barred. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

TED MARCUM, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SHERIFF DAVE DUCHAK, et al., 

Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

:

Case No. 3:17-cv-437 

District Judge Walter H. Rice 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

ORDER 

This case is presently before the Court upon Plaintiff Ted Marcum’s “Request[] to 

add evidence into the record for purposes of showing to the court all of the evidence 

being disclosed at this time to the Defendants as initial disclosure that Plaintiff is aware 

of at the time.” (Doc. #98). 

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(4), “Unless the court orders 

otherwise, all disclosures under Rule 26(a) must be in writing, signed, and served.” In 

other words, Plaintiff must serve his written and signed disclosures upon Defendants. 

Plaintiff’s disclosures need not be filed with the Court at this time. Accordingly, 

Plaintiff’s Request (Doc. #98) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

October 29, 2019 s/Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington

 United States Magistrate Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Case No. 3:17-cr-193 

 Plaintiff, : Judge Thomas M. Rose 

v. : 

DAMAAD GARDNER, : 

Defendant. : 

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE 

 Upon the United States’ Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture and the Court’s review of the 

record, the Court HEREBY FINDS THAT: 

On February 5, 2019, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, finding that all 

right, title, and interest in $876.00 in United States Currency (hereinafter the “subject property”) 

had been forfeited to the United States under 21 U.S.C. § 853(a). The Court also found that the 

defendant had an interest in the subject property and directed the United States to seize the subject 

property and to give notice of its intent to forfeit the property. 

The United States gave electronic notice through the CM/ECF notification system of the 

Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture to counsel for the defendant, and the defendant did not 

object to the forfeiture. 

The United States published notice of this forfeiture action and of its intent to dispose of 

the subject property in accordance with the law on an official government internet site 

(www.forfeiture.gov) for at least 30 consecutive days, beginning on February 7, 2019. 

On November 6, 2018, the Court held the defendant’s sentencing hearing and announced 

the forfeiture of the subject property. The Judgment establishes that the defendant shall forfeit 
2 

the subject property to the United States. 

The United States did not send direct written notice of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture 

because no person or entity reasonably appeared to be a potential claimant with standing to contest 

the forfeiture of the subject property in the ancillary proceeding. 

No person or entity has filed a timely petition with the Court asserting any interest in the 

subject property or objecting to its proposed forfeiture. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. All right, title, and interest in the subject property is condemned and forfeited to the 

United States under 21 U.S.C. § 853(a) and no right, title, or interest shall remain in any other 

person or entity. 

2. The United States shall dispose of the subject property in accordance with the law. 

3. The United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose 

of enforcing this Final Order of Forfeiture. 

SO ORDERED: 

Dated: April 22, 2019 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 __________________________________________ 

THOMAS M. ROSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 
U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, John Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 14th day of October, 2007.                                                                                                                
|   

JOHN BRIAN NICHOLS
John Brian Nichols, President and ChiefExecutive Officer

















---
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 2.9 (c) of the 2015-2 Servicing Supplement dated as of May 1,
2015 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2015-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and GMF Leasing LLC in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in
the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from May 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 25, 2016
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

In re: Carlean Dates

Case No. 1:17-cv-842

Judge Michael R. Barrett

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on Appellant’s, Carlean Dates, Notice of Appeal from 

Bankruptcy Court docketed on December 15, 2017. (Doc. 1). On January 18, 2018, the 

bankruptcy clerk certified the record, and the Court set a briefing schedule by docket notation. 

(Doc. 2). On May 23, 2018, the Court ordered Appellant to show cause, within fourteen (14) days 

of entry of that order, why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, as Appellant 

had not filed a brief with the Court per the briefing schedule.1 (Doc. 3); see Arnold v. G.E. Capital 

Auto Lease, Inc., 63 Fed. Appx. 188, 191 (6th Cir. 2003) (affirming dismissal of bankruptcy appeal 

for failure to prosecute); Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8003(a)(2) (granting the district 

court authority to dismiss bankruptcy appeals for non-prosecution). Appellant has failed to 

respond to the Court’s order or file a brief.

In light of the above, the Court finds that dismissal for failure to prosecute is proper. It is 

hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This matter shall 

be CLOSED and TERMINATED from the Court’s active docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s Michael R. Barrett

Michael R. Barrett

United States District Court

 1 Appellant’s brief was due by February 1, 2018. (Doc. 2).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Joseph W. Crawford, Jr.,
Plaintiff(s),
Case Number: 1:17 cv723
VS.
Judge Susan J. Dlott
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant(s).
ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate
Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings
and filed with this Court on December 18, 2018 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17).
Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered
de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This case is hereby

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

e Judge Susan J. Tit
United States DistNct Court
Exhibit 10.31

 

Unofficial English Translation Solely for Convenience

 

“Haizhong” CWSF Boiler Sales Agency Agreement

Exclusivity Supplemental Agreement

 

	    Party A:
    	     
    	    Qingdao Haizhong Enterprises Co. Ltd.
    
	     
    	     
    	     
    
	    Party B:
    	     
    	    Shaanxi Suo’ang New Energy Enterprise Co., Ltd.
    


 

In order to ensure closer cooperation between the two parties, Party A and Party B, after consultation for consensus, have reached the following agreement and entered into this supplemental agreement regarding the exclusive representative agent right for CWSF in Shaanxi region.

 

1.                                       Party B is the sole representative agent in Shaanxi region for “Haizhong” brand CWSF boiler.

 

2.                                       During the term of cooperation, Party A shall not transfer for any reason the representative agent right for “Haizhong” brand CWSF boiler to any other party or enter into representative agent agreement with any other company; nor shall Party B represent or promote other CWSF boiler products similar to those of Party A.

 

3.                                       Other  matters must be implemented pursuant to the original contract.  This agreement has the equal legal effect as the original contract.

 

4.                                       This agreement is in duplicates, with one to each party, and both have the same legal power.

 

	    Party A:
    	     
    	    Qingdao Haizhong Enterprises Co. Ltd.
    
	     
    	     
    	     
    
	    Legal Representative:
    	     
    	    JIANG Guili (Signature)
    
	     
    	     
    	     
    
	    Date of Execution:
    	     
    	    June 11, 2010
    
	     
    	     
    	     
    
	    Party B:
    	     
    	    Shaanxi Suo’ang New Energy Enterprise Co., Ltd.
    
	     
    	     
    	     
    
	    Legal Representative:
    	     
    	    REN Baoren (Signature)
    
	     
    	     
    	     
    
	    Date of Execution:
    	     
    	    June 11, 2010
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                        HIGHLANDS INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
 
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                              JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
----                              ---------------------------------------------
<S>                               <C>
Aberdeen Insurance Company        Texas
Highlands Casualty Company        Texas
Highlands Claims and Safety
 Services, Inc.                   Texas
Highlands Insurance Company
 (U.K.) Limited                   United Kingdom
Highlands Insurance Company       Texas
Highlands Limited                 Bermuda
Highlands Lloyds                  Texas
Highlands Overseas Company        Panama
Highlands Overseas Limited        Bermuda
Highlands Underwriters Insurance
 Company                          Texas
Highlands Underwriters Insurance
 Agency, Inc.                     Texas
Highlands Underwriting Agents,
 Limited                          United Kingdom
Highlands Acquisition Corp.       Delaware
Underwriters Special Risks of
 La., Inc.                        Louisiana
Underwriters Special Risks, Inc.  Texas
</TABLE>
 
                                       i
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES, ex re/., ESL, INC,

etal.
Plaintiffs,
vs. Case No. 3:17¢v370
BRIGADIER CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES, LLC, et al., : JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
Defendants.

UNITED STATES, ex rel.,
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS OF

DAYTON, e/ al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs. : Case No. 3:17ev408
BRIGADIER CONSTRUCTION 3
SERVICES, LLC, er al., JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
Defendants.

DECISION AND ENTRY CONSOLIDATING CAPTIONED CAUSES, AND,
AT THE REQUEST OF COUNSEL, STAYING SAME, PENDING
COMPLETION OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THE
PARTIES TO THE CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION

The captioned cause is ordered Administratively Processed on the docket of this Court,


given the stay of all proceedings requested by counsel pending the completion of arbitration

proceedings.

LAL Key
WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of record
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Russell M. Medford, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/RUSSELL M. MEDFORDRussell
      M. MedfordPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  May
      9, 2008

















CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Mark P. Colonnese, Executive Vice President, Commercial
Operations and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/MARK P. COLONNESEMark
      P. ColonneseExecutive
      Vice President, Commercial Operationsand
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:  May
      9, 2008
No. 06- 15 -00106- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

MOISES RENTERIA APPELLANT

VS

STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF OF APPELLANT

TO HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

NOW COMES, the Appellant by and through his Attorney, Tim Cone, and does

hereby move this Honorable Court to grant an extension of time for the purpose of filing

the Appellant’s Brief.

I.

Judgment was entered with the 188 th District Court of Gregg County, Texas, in

Cause Number 38,802-A styled The State o f Te xa s vs. Moises Renteria, on the 1st day

of August, 2011. An out of time appeal was granted by the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals on June 15, 2015. The Appellant’s brief is due on September 17, 2015

. This is

the Appellan t’s first request for an extensi on of time for the late filing of Appellant’s

brief. ACCEPTED

06-15-00106-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

9/16/2015 7:18:39 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKAppellant ’ s attorney requests an extension of time for late fil ing of a brief until

October 17t h, 2015 , and will, hopefully be the last re quest for extension of time for late

filing of said brief and would show to the Court the following: Appellant ’ s attorney was

on a prepaid vacation from August 21, 2015

, through August 30, 2015. Unfortunately,

upon returning from said vacation, Appellant ’ s attorney contracted pneumonia and was

very ill for about 10 days. A great deal of work stacked up during the time of the

vacation and ensuing illness. Further , Appellant ’ s attorney has recently submitted a brief

to this Court in the case of Derek Clin ton Ward, Case 06

- 15

- 00110

- CR. Further,

although it may be irrelevant, the extension in the case at bar is likely in relation to the

last brief Appellant ’ s attorney will submit to this Court due to an impending retirement

.

WHERWFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant ’ s attorney respectfully

requests that this Honorable Court grant Appellant ’ s request for an Extension to file a

late brief until October 17, 2015.

. Respectfully Submitted,

/s/Tim Cone

______________________________ Tim Cone, Attorney At Law

State Bar N. 04660350

P.O. Box 413

Gilmer, Texas 75644

903

- 725

- 6270

e

- mail: timcone6@aol.comCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of t he above and foregoing

Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has b een served t o Zan Brown

, Assistant Cri min al District Attorney for Gregg County , attorney for Appellee, o n this

the 16 th day o f September , 201 5

.

/s/Tim Cone

_____________________________ Tim Cone, Attorney At Law