alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

April 15, 2014

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00269

- CR

IN RE JASON RAY BOUC HARD , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 178th District Court Harris County, Tex as Trial Court Cause No. 1374815



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 4, 2014, relator Jason Ray Bouchard filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221 ; see also Tex. R. App.
P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to co mpel his appointed defense attorney and the State’s attorney to provide relator copies of any documents filed with this Court in his related appeal.
Our mandamus jurisdiction is limited. By statute, we have authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in our court of2

appeals district, and as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221. Relator does not identify as a respondent a judge of a district or county court. Nor is issu ance of the writ against either of the named respondents necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Therefore, we have no jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4315 

To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to aid in funding 

of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2009 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to 

aid in funding of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States War 

5 Bonds Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to authorize the issuance 

8 of United States War Bonds to aid in the funding of the 

9 operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4315 IH

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF UNITED 

2 STATES WAR BONDS. 

3 Section 3102 of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(f) Issuance of United States War Bonds— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized 

7 to issue bonds under this section, to be known as 

8 ‘United States War Bonds’, to aid in the funding of 

9 the operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other mili10 tary operations abroad identified by the Secretary of 

11 Defense as being part of the international conflicts 

12 against terrorism. 

13 ‘‘(2) FORM.—The bonds authorized by para14 graph (1) shall be in such form and denominations, 

15 and shall be subject to such terms and conditions of 

16 issue, conversion, redemption, maturation, payment, 

17 and rate of interest as the Secretary may pre18 scribe.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the registrant and Marc Rubin



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT dated this
15th day of June, 2010 between Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the “Company”) and Marc Rubin (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to an
employment agreement dated May 16, 2009 (as amended by agreement dated February 17, 2010, the “Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the compensation provision of the Agreement will expire by its terms on June 30, 2010 and the Company and Executive wish to
amend the Agreement to provide for uninterrupted service by the Executive 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the
premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 

1. Effective Date. The effective date of this Amendment Agreement (the “Effective Date”) is July 1, 2010.

 2. Trigger Date. The term Trigger Date as used in the Agreement shall be changed to December 31, 2010.

 3. Restricted Shares. In consideration of Executive’s agreement to extend the period during which he will not
receive any cash compensation, on the Effective Date the Company shall issue to Executive 82,800 shares of restricted stock, which shares shall vest in six equal installments of 13,800 shares on the last day of each month between the Effective Date
and the Trigger Date. 
 4. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment Agreement, the Agreement remains
in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment Agreement to be duly executed as
of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Eurelio Cavalier

	Name:	 	Eurelio Cavalier
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Compensation Committee

  

	
	EXECUTIVE


			
		
		 	 /s/ Marc Rubin

	Name:	 	Marc Rubin
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 2 of 16 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 3 of 16 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 4 of 16 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 5 of 16 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 6 of 16 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 7 of 16 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 8 of 16 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 9 of 16 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 10 of 16 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 11 of 16 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 12 of 16 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 13 of 16 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 14 of 16 PAGEID #: 14
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 15 of 16 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 2:17-mj-00622-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 16 of 16 PAGEID #: 16
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
                        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OSK CAPITAL II CORP.(the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angela Buffa,
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 12, 2005


                                /s/ Angela Buffa
                                ----------------
                                Angela Buffa
                                Chief Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permit modification issued.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Polly Penhale, ACA Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-8030; email:                         *ACApermits@nsf.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On December 3, 2021, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit modification request received. The permit modification was issued on January 3, 2022, to:                          ( print page 1792)    

### Permit No. 2018-025

Allison Kean, Quark Expeditions Inc.

Erika N. Davis,

Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.

[FR Doc. 2022-00443 Filed 1-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Dale L. Spencer,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:17-cv-218

Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the court for consideration of the

October 31, 2017, report and recommendation of the United States

magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b). The magistrate judge recommended that the case be

remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g),

sentence four, for further proceedings. The magistrate judge

concluded that the administrative law judge’s acknowledgment of

plaintiff’s right foot disorder of acquired hallux rigidus with

lack of mobility as a severe impairment was internally inconsistent

with the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) finding that

plaintiff is capable of light work. Doc. 15, pp. 7-8. The

magistrate judge further noted that the administrative law judge’s

confusing discussion of plaintiff’s foot disorder was not clarified

through reliance on the opinions of experts who did not consider

that disorder in rendering their opinions. Doc. 15, p. 8. The

magistrate judge recommended remanding this case based on these

internal inconsistencies which rendered the RFC decision

unsupported by substantial evidence. Doc. 15, p. 8.

The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties
that failure to object to the report and recommendation within

fourteen days of the report “will result in a waiver of the right

to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation de

novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the

decision of the District Court adopting the Report and

Recommendation.” Doc. 15, p. 9. The time period for filing

objections to the report and recommendation has expired, and no

party has objected to the report and recommendation.

The court adopts the report and recommendation of the

magistrate judge (Doc. 15). The decision of the Commissioner is

reversed, and this case is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to

§405(g), sentence four, for further proceedings and a new decision. 

The court makes no ruling on the ultimate issue of disability. The

clerk shall enter judgment vacating the decision of the

Commissioner and remanding this case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g),

sentence four for further proceedings.

Date: November 17, 2017 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge 

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NHUONG VAN NGUYEN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

JACKSON LUCKY; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 56701

D.C. No. 5:17

- cv

- 01752

- JGB

- KK

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Nhuong Van Nguyen appeals pro se from the d istrict court’s judgment

dismissing his action arising from a state court family law action. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s

dismissal under the Rooker

– Feldman doctrine. Noel v. Hall , 341 F.3d 1148, 1154

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 16 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 56701

(9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Nguyen’s action as barred by the

Rooker

– Feldman doctrine because the complaint attacks a determination in

Nguyen’s prior state court case

. See id. at 1155

- 57 ( Rooker

– Feldman doctrine bars

de facto app eals of a state court decision)

. Contrary to N g u yen ’s contention that he

has allege d “fraud up on the court,” t he district court properly concluded that

Nguyen did not allege facts showing that an adverse party committed an extrinsic

fraud on the state court. See Kougasian v. TMSL, Inc. , 359 F.3d 1136, 11 40

- 41

(9th Cir. 2004) (defining extrinsic fraud, and recognizing that the Rooker

– Feldman

doctrine does not apply if extrinsic fraud prevented a party from presenting his or

her claim in state court )

.

AFFIRMED.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4465 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to take into account each child a veteran has when determining 

the veteran’s financial status when receiving hospital care or medical 

services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2010 

Mr. KISSELL (for himself, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. MASSA, Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan, Mr. ISRAEL, and Mr. POE of Texas) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take into account each 

child a veteran has when determining the veteran’s financial status when receiving hospital care or medical services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF ATTRIBUTABLE INCOME 

4 FOR VETERANS WITH CHILDREN. 

5 Section 1722(f)(1) of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended to read as follows: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4465 IH

1 ‘‘(1) The term ‘attributable income’ means the 

2 income of a veteran for the previous year determined 

3 in the same manner as the manner in which a deter4 mination is made of the total amount of income by 

5 which the rate of pension for such veteran under 

6 section 1521 of this title would be reduced if such 

7 veteran were eligible for pension under that section, 

8 except that in determining such income, the Sec9 retary shall treat as a child an unmarried person 

10 who— 

11 ‘‘(A) is placed in the legal custody of the 

12 veteran as a result of an order of a court of 

13 competent jurisdiction in the United States (or 

14 possession of the United States) for a period of 

15 at least 12 consecutive months; 

16 ‘‘(B) either— 

17 ‘‘(i) has not attained the age of 21; 

18 ‘‘(ii) has not attained the age of 23 

19 and is enrolled in a full time course of 

20 study at an institution of higher learning 

21 approved by the Secretary; or 

22 ‘‘(iii) is incapable of self support be23 cause of a mental or physical incapacity 

24 that occurred while the person was considVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:00 Jan 20, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4465.IH H4465

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4465 IH

1 ered a child of the veteran under this sub2 paragraph pursuant to subclause (i) or (ii); 

3 ‘‘(C) is dependent on the veteran for over 

4 one-half of the person’s support; and 

5 ‘‘(D) resides with the veteran unless sepa6 rated to receive institutional care as a result of 

7 disability or incapacitation or under such other 

8 circumstances as the Secretary may by regula9 tion prescribe.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlumiFuel Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Henry Fong, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.
 
 
 /s/ Henry FongHenry FongPrincipal Executive Officer and

Principal Accounting OfficerAugust 16, 2010
 
 
 A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ALUMIFUEL POWER CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ALUMIFUEL POWER CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sinoenergy Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bo
      Huang, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Qiong (Laby) Wu, the Chief Financial
      Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




May 20 ,
      2008




/s/
                Bo HuangBo
                HuangChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Qiong (Laby) WuQiong
                (Laby) WuChief
                Financial Officer
p.1 

OAR Box 1477 

Preppedby Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

25) ll-J-16 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/31/2008 11:18:29 AM Sheet 25 of 36 
P.2 

"l-ll-QS 11:28 FIBER PRO CADILLAC ID=231 775 2524 PQ1/S2 

A *^i-5'a 

FAX TRANSMISSION 

II-I-H, 

FIBER PRO, INC. 

Po Box 3ft 2. 1637 MARTY PAUL. STREET 

CADILLAC. Ml 49601 

(231) 775-OI9 7 

FAX: (231) 775-25S-4 

JAM i 9 2001 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

To: Keith Barnett, Date: January 11,2000 

Fax#: 734.622 0162 ^Z ? SV/ ^V^OPages: 2, including this cover sheet. 

From: Jack E. Griffiths 

Snbject: EPA MACT Review 

COMMENTS: 

LOW STYRENE GELCOATS 

While we have enjoyed some success in using a lower styrene content gelcoat in our 

operation (as low as 25%. CCP 969-WJ-457 White); some ofour business requires 

the use of alternate gelcoats which have higher styrene content (ie; 37.5% Ferro 

81-710170). The latter is a small percentage, but still impacts our emission rates. 

STYRENE SUPPRESSED RESINS 

Over two decades of laminating experiences have convinced me that this family of 

resins produces inferior, non acceptable laminates. 

FLOW COATERS 

Having researched flow coaters since their first introduction by the Venus Company 

and most recently by Magnum, Inc.; it is evident that the "flow coater" is not designed 

for nor will it function in our process. Which is a mechanical, controlled, non-atomized 

covered spray up operation. The flow coater does not allow either a spray pattem large 

enough nor enough volume ofresin to be able to produce large flat panels in any orderly 

timely fashion. 
P.3 

81-11-88 11:28 FIBER PRO CADILLAC ID=231 775 2524 P82/82 

MATERIAL COST INCREASES 

Our processes supply FRP panels to the transportation industry, a very cost conscious 

market. We would price ourselves out of business if we employed the use of costly 

materials. 

ADD ON CONTROLS 

This past year our sales were less than $3,000,000. Even given sound profit minded 

business operation; the cost of controls and operation would be prohibitive.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 26, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The First Amended and Restated Mark R. Peterson Bank Trust, the 
First Amended and Restated Susan P. Depass Bank Trust, the First 
Amended and Restated Chase R. Peterson Bank Trust, the First Amended 
and Restated Clair P. Peterson Bank Trust, the First Amended and 
Restated Cole M. Peterson Bank Trust, and the First Amended and 
Restated Aja M. Depass Bank Trust, Mark R. Peterson, as trustee, the 
Polly P. Peterson Trust, and the Polly P. Peterson IRA, Polly P. 
Peterson, as trustee and owner, respectively, all of Dakota Dunes, 
South Dakota; to join the Peterson Family Control Group, a group acting 
concert, to retain voting shares of Liberty Financial Services, Inc., 
and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Liberty National Bank, 
both of Sioux City, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 6, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-00446 Filed 1-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P