alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                 *Richard                E. Bagley*                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard                E. BagleyPrincipal                Financial OfficerOctober                30, 2008 |

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 426 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 

recovery period for certain roof systems. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2009 

Mr. PASCRELL (for himself, Mr. HERGER, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. MOORE of 

Kansas, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. CARNAHAN, Mr. PITTS, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, and Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the depreciation recovery period for certain roof systems. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Green Roofing Energy 

5 Efficiency Tax Act of 2009’’ or ‘‘GREETA of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEPRECIATION RECOVERY PERIOD FOR CERTAIN 

7 ROOF SYSTEMS. 

8 (a) 20-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD.—Subparagraph 

9 (F) of section 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 426 IH

1 1986 (relating to classification of certain property) is 

2 amended to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(F) 20-YEAR PROPERTY.—The term ‘20- 

4 year property’ means— 

5 ‘‘(i) initial clearing and grading land 

6 improvements with respect to any electric 

7 utility transmission and distribution plant, 

8 and 

9 ‘‘(ii) any roof system which meets the 

10 requirements of Standard 90.1–2004 of 

11 the American Society of Heating, Refrig12 erating, and Air Conditioning Engineers 

13 and is on nonresidential real property.’’. 

14 (b) REQUIREMENT TO USE STRAIGHT LINE METH15 OD.—Paragraph (3) of section 168(b) of such Code is 

16 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara17 graph: 

18 ‘‘(J) Any roof system described in 

19 subsection (e)(3)(F)(ii).’’. 

20 (c) ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM.—The table contained in 

21 section 168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 

22 the last item and inserting the following new items: 

‘‘(F)(i) ................................................................................................ 25

(F)(ii) ............................................................................................... 20’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 426 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAMES HENRY STEPHENSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2688

[ July 29, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Okeechobee County ; Michael Heisey , Judge; L.T. Case No.

472017CF000475

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Stacey Kime, Assistant Public

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, C.J., W ARNER and G ROSS

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 23.1
                        Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Point West Capital Corporation:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  Nos.
333-21825  and  333-21827 on Form S-8 of Point West Capital  Corporation  of our
report dated February 26, 1998,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of
Point West Capital Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of operations,  shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report
appears  in the  December  31,  1997,  annual  report on Form 10-K of Point West
Capital Corporation.

                                                /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


March 24, 1998
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

242 CA 13-01666 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

PAMELA J. QUILTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DANIELLE J. CORMIER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM MATTAR, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (APRIL J. ORLOWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BARTH SULLIVAN BEHR, BUFFALO (JAMES A. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered December 7, 2012. The order granted defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to provide unrestricted medical record authorizations.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action seeking damages for injuries she allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to provide unrestricted medical record authorizations inasmuch as she failed to comply with a stipulated order directing her to do so by a certain date. Notably, plaintiff does not contest the validity of that stipulated order. “[U]nless public policy is affronted, parties to a civil dispute are free to chart their own litigation course . . . They ‘may fashion the basis upon which a particular controversy will be resolved . . . and in doing so ‘[t]hey may stipulate away . . . rights’ ” ( Mitchell v New York Hosp. , 61 NY2d 208, 214; see generally Hann v Black , 96 AD3d 1503, 1504). We nevertheless note that, at oral argument, defendant’s counsel agreed that the records may first be submitted to the court for an in camera review to determine their relevancy.

Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

4/5/2019

 Southern District of Ohio

Sharon E. Snyder

3:17-cv-393

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Commissioner’s non-disability finding is unsupported by substantial evidence, and REVERSED; this matter

is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for proceedings

consistent with this opinion; case is TERMINATED on the docket.

✔ Michael J. Newman

Decision and Entry
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Pacific Architects & Engineers, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62784

)

Under Contract Nos. W56HZV

- 17

- C

- 0117

NNJ08JA02C )

)

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Nicole J. Owren

- Wiest, Esq.

Charles Baek, Esq.

Erin N. Rankin, Esq.

Crowell & Moring LLP

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Amelia R. Lister

- Sobotkin, Esq.

Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

Adrianne L. Goins, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

Defense Contract Management Agency

Chantilly, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: April 13 , 2022

JOHN J. THRASHER

Adminis trative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62784

, Appeal of Pacific Architects

& Engineers, LLC , rendered in conformance with the Boa rd’s Charter.

Dated: April 14, 2022

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB  Reliant Home Warranty
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Boyd
Soussana, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herby certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, to the best of his/her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:                                       /s/ Boyd Soussana
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                Boyd Soussana
                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                          November 15, 2005

This  certification   accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4315 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4315

To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to aid in funding 
               of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2009

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to aid in funding 
               of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States War Bonds Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to authorize the issuance of United 
States War Bonds to aid in the funding of the operations in Iraq and 
Afghanistan.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF UNITED STATES WAR BONDS.

    Section 3102 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) Issuance of United States War Bonds--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to issue 
        bonds under this section, to be known as `United States War 
        Bonds', to aid in the funding of the operations in Iraq, 
        Afghanistan, and other military operations abroad identified by 
        the Secretary of Defense as being part of the international 
        conflicts against terrorism.
            ``(2) Form.--The bonds authorized by paragraph (1) shall be 
        in such form and denominations, and shall be subject to such 
        terms and conditions of issue, conversion, redemption, 
        maturation, payment, and rate of interest as the Secretary may 
        prescribe.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc.
(the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 14, 2005
    
    /s/ Stephen N. Joffe
    
    Name: Stephen N. JoffeTitle: Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDated: March 14, 2005
    
    /s/ Alan H. Buckey
    
    Name: Alan H. BuckeyTitle: Executive Vice President/Finance andChief Financial Officer
 55
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4385 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4385

To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to aid in funding 
               of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

 Mr. Meek of Florida (for himself, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, 
and Mr. Carnahan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to aid in funding 
               of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States War Bonds Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to authorize the issuance of United 
States War Bonds to aid in the funding of the operations in Iraq and 
Afghanistan.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF UNITED STATES WAR BONDS.

    Section 3102 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) Issuance of United States War Bonds.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to issue 
        bonds under this section, to be known as `United States War 
        Bonds', to aid in the funding of the operations in Iraq and 
        Afghanistan.
            ``(2) Form.--The bonds authorized by paragraph (1) shall be 
        in such form and denominations, and shall be subject to such 
        terms and conditions of issue, conversion, redemption, 
        maturation, payment, and rate of interest as the Secretary may 
        prescribe.
            ``(3) Marketing.--The Secretary shall carry out a program 
        to encourage sales of United States War Bonds, including 
        activities to facilitate the purchase of such bonds.
            ``(4) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $3,000,000 for carrying out the marketing 
        program described in paragraph (3).''.
                                 <all>
```
SCWC-18-0000781 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. STACY EDWARD HARDOBY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000781; 2CPC-17-0000693) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stacy Edward Hardoby’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on December 24, 2019, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 13, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-18-0000781 13-FEB-2020 11:46 AM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jeffrey A. Kupp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JEFFREY A. KUPP                                                                   
|Jeffrey A. Kupp                                                                       
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                                                                                      
|Date: April 30, 2008
II 

Calendar No. 395 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4547 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 119 Station Road in Cheyney, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘Captain Luther H. Smith, U.S. Army Air Forces 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN LUTHER H. SMITH, U.S. ARMY AIR 

4 FORCES POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 119 Station Road in Cheyney, 

7 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cap8 tain Luther H. Smith, U.S. Army Air Forces Post Office’’. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4547 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Luther H. 

5 Smith, U.S. Army Air Forces Post Office’’. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS

PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 395 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4547 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostH. Smith, U.S. Army Air Forces Post Office’’. Cheyney, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Captain Luther al Service located at 119 Station Road in 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 22

- 00745

- CV

IN RE CHRISTUS SANTA ROSA HEALTH CARE CORPORATION D/B/A CHRISTUS SANTA ROSA HOSPITAL

- WESTOVER HILLS

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 11, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 3, 2022 , relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a

motion to stay a discovery order pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus,

which this court granted on November 4, 2022 . After considering the petition , real party i n
interest’s response, relator’s reply, and th is record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to

the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

52.8(a). The stay imposed on November 4, 2022 is lifte d.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022

- CI

- 01107 , styled Sharon Kay Goodman v. Christus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation d/b/a Christus Santa Rosa Hospital

- Westover Hills and Franklin Dale Barber , pending in the 166th Judicial District Court
, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Laura Salinas presiding.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Billy Joe Smith, Appellant

No. 06-12-00071-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

0518108). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Billy Joe Smith, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 23, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
| (1)  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      registrant. |

| February      19, 2008                             |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| /s/      Jeffrey R. Immelt                         |   |
| Jeffrey      R. ImmeltChief      Executive Officer |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/      Keith S. Sherin                           |   |
| Keith      S. SherinChief      Financial Officer   |   |

----