alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         296,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    193,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               768,589
<PP&E>                                         736,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                 735,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 867,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,175,757
<BONDS>                                      1,015,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,572
<COMMON>                                         6,144
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,495,360)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   867,113
<SALES>                                         61,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,158
<CGS>                                            3,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  612,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                429,719
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            429,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   429,719
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Kupp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JEFFREY A. KUPP                                                                   
|Jeffrey A. Kupp                                                                       
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: October 29, 2009
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2009-1213

Directorate Identifier: 2009NM097AD

MD80-57A242 IN 01 --- 10/29/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               4,780
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          1,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     9,113
<PP&E>                                              14,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                         596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      26,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               12,308
<BONDS>                                              3,389
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                                 9
<OTHER-SE>                                           5,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        26,198
<SALES>                                                251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       251
<CGS>                                                4,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (10,995)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (10,995)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (10,995)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (1.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.38)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CAROLYN DAWN JONES, : 

 : Case No. 2:17-CV-1062 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 v. : 

 : Magistrate Judge Deavers 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL : 

SECURITY, : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

ORDER 

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s June 18, 2019, Report and 

and Recommendation (ECF No. 20), which recommended that Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors 

(ECF No. 13) be OVERRULED and that the decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED. 

The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that the failure to object 

results in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation 

de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court 

adopting the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 20 at 25). The parties have failed to file any 

objections, and the deadline for objections (July 2, 2019) has lapsed. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on the independent 

consideration of the analysis therein, OVERRULES the Statement of Errors, and enters judgment 

for Defendant. This case is hereby CLOSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGEDATED: 

Dated: July 12, 2019
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 136 ) ll-E-9 6 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07

AM Sheet 136 of 264P. 2 06/20/9 7 10:1 9 AUSTI N COUNTERTOP S IN C * 1919941023 4 4jxv4W4iu_;j 4 PE S RTP N C NO.02 3 P0 3 ©002/00 2 

# A-94-5 2 l|-E %

From : i Date: !

i CoDtslcr : ! Company : Contac tRepor t

Melani e Proctor, Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Jun e 18,199 7 Ms . Kay e Langha

m Austi n Countertop s 

# s\

Telepfooo e Number : (512 ) 835-510 0 Fa x Number : (512 ) 339-179 6 Coota< tSummary : jMs . Langha

m wa s contacte d t o verif

y th e resi n hazardous airpollutan t(HA? ) conten t informatio n provide d i n the 199 3 EP A screenin g survey submitted b y Austi n Countertops . Ms . Procto r .pointe d ou ttha

tAusti n Countertop s reporte d a very lo w resin HA P conten ti n th e surve y compare d t o othe rpolyme rcastin g facilitie s an d tha tth e EP A woul d lik e t o verif

y thi s informatio n befor e i twoul d be used i n determining nationa l emissio n standards fo rhazardou s ai r pollutant s fo rthi s industry . )|ds . Langha

m explaine d tha

tth e materia

l safet y dat a shee tshowe d tha

tthei rresi n 2 8 percen tstyren e an

d 1 8 percentalpha methy l styrene . When aske d i f Austi n Counterjop s add s an

y additiona

l HA P to th e resi n onc e i ti s received , Ms . Langham explaine d additional HA P i s adde

d to the resi n a

tth e facility . contain * Count e tha tno INFORMATIO N I S ACCURAT E 

### Ay L<**iti?i&iQJ/&-**<JL 

# to

> 

# (fat <7>Uy

<^uu 25W V **** *"

^ ^ <&^fi

f/}0*wu

^ ^
Afos &*&> OrSM. 

# ° Miauc <tf <>***$ tv*-** f06/20/9 ? 10:1 9 AUSTI NCOUNTERTOP S IN C • » 1919941023 4 

# S$ULvfcn ^ouibtevfofiAj*Jnc.

1110 8 BLUF F

' BeN O ORIV E . AUSTIN . TEXA S 787S 3 • (512 ) 835-S1C O • FA X (512 1 339-179 6

N"J M 2 i S Or ' PAGES : r? -

(NO T -IN.r-'wiiS G C0VS3? . ?AOS i P. 3 NO. 02 3 00 1 ,

aj 

# " I "X -P. 4 06/20/9 ? 10=1 9 > 06*/18/9 7 I 17:4 4 AUSTI N COUNTERTOP

S IN C * 1919941023 4 1919941023 4 ©1919941023 4 PE S RT P N C NO.02 3 D0 2 ©001/00 2

ffi «c* « E^neMMeMTA c sERvtcea . MC . / #•*«• .



# 3 i <fcy.i9* * Centra ) Pa « West 900 1 Sout h Miam i Bouleuartf . Sift g 30 0 CO . BOJ ; 1207 7 Resaaxe * Triangl e Py < N C 27709>2O7 7 (919 ) 941-033 3 FA X (919 ) 941423 4 

# FAX COMMUNICATIO N
Date : FROM ; TO : 

# &£//#/

*7 »C

'*•* 

### Name : Address : 

# M

faug £<*»ifr

ayry 

### sdC'Sj/to £ e 

### * >• ? i'*~ £*j* S 

# s4«t4:* , *T~X

Phon e Number : TA XNUMBER : REFERENC E COOE : 

# Csn) f35 - r/^g >

C S'l) 33f - /7f*
THI S COMMUNICATIO N COMPRISE S 2 COMMENTS : *J)sd^

/fc. £ PAGES INCLUDIN G THI S PAGE .

/?

WAJMWOTDU . e-c . • n*se*«c » IMMNSI E W X N C •10 8 AXQtLSS

. C- • e«Cnn»»Ti . <J M 

# 3
#### Auto-Owners Insurance Company v Rucker,

No. 90819;

reported below: 188 Mich App 125.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00031- CV

M. E. D., Appellant

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TO M GREEN CO UNTY, 340 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. C-0 8-0 142- CP S, H ONO RAB LE JAY WEATH ERB Y , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

M.E.D. appea ls from the trial court’s decr ee t er m i n at ing his pare ntal rig hts to his minor child, Z .B.D

. See Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001. I n support of its petition to terminate M.E.D.’s
pare ntal rig hts, the Texas Depar tment of Fa

mily and Protec tive Service s (the Depa rtment) alleg ed
t h at M.E.D. failed to support Z .B.D

. in acc ordanc e with M.E.D.’s ability during the p er i o d o f

one y ear ending within six months of the date the Depa rtment filed its petition to terminate M.E.D.’s rig hts, see id. § 161.001(1)( F) , and that M.E.D. constructively abandone d Z .B.D ., see id. § 161.001(1)(

N). The Depa

rtment also alleg ed that termination of M.E.D.’s pare ntal rig hts was in
Z .B.D .’s best interest. See id. § 161.001(2). Following a termination hear ing, the trial court found by clea r and convincing evidenc e that statutory g rounds for t er m i n at ing M.E.D.’s pare ntal rig hts exis ted and that ter

mination was in Z .B.D .’s best intere st.On app ea l , M .E.D.’s court-a ppointed attorney has filed an Anders brief informing this Court that she has made a diligent revie w of the appellate rec o rd an d can find no arg uable
g rounds to be advanc ed on appea l. See Anders v. Calif ornia , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The brief

me e ts th e r e q

u ir e me n ts o f A n d

e r s b y p r e s e n ti n g a p r o f

e s s io n a l e v a lu a

ti o n o f th e r e c o r d d e mo n s tr a ti n g why there are no arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See Taylor v. Texas Dep’ t of Protective & Regulatory Servs. , 160 S.W .3d 641, 646–47 (Tex. App.—Austin 2 0 0 5 , p e t. d e n ie d ) ( a p p ly in g A n ders
proce dure in appea l from termination of pare ntal rig hts). Counsel provided M.E.D. with a copy of
t h e A nders brief along with a notice advising M.E.D. of his rig ht to examine the appellate re co rd and to file a

pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. Upon rec eiving an Anders brief, we must conduct a fu l l examination of all of the
proce eding s to deter

mine whether the appea l is wholly frivolous. Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We have revie wed the entire rec ord , i n cludi ng the Anders brief submitt ed on M.E.D.’s behalf , and we have found nothing that would arg uably support an appea l. We ag ree that the appea l is frivolous and without merit. Acc ording ly , we aff irm the trial court’s decr ee terminating M.E.D.’s
pare ntal rig hts and g rant c ounsel’s motion to withdraw as a ttorney of re cord.

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and F ield Affir med Filed: Apr il 24, 2014

2
# National Mentoring Month, 2022

I often say that America can be defined in one word—possibilities. No matter our background or circumstance, every child in America has the right to go as far as their dreams will take them. But those dreams are rarely reached alone. We all benefit from the support, wisdom, and nurturing of mentors who navigated the path before us.

By standing on the shoulders of mentors, young people have led America forward at each inflection point in our history. I will never forget the many mentors who encouraged and empowered me as a student, as a local elected official in my twenties, and as a young United States Senator finding my way. During National Mentoring Month, we honor all those parents and family members, teachers and coaches, employers and co-workers, community and faith leaders, and so many others who devote time, care, and energy to helping our young people thrive.

As we continue to build back from the pandemic, my Administration is making unprecedented investments to set the next generation up for success. Earlier this year, the Department of Labor awarded $89 million through its YouthBuild program and over $20 million through its Workforce Pathways for Youth programs to dedicated mentors who share their wisdom and experience and provide employment and counseling services to young people. We also proudly support initiatives across our executive departments and agencies that provide tutoring, community service opportunities, school-based and after-school programs, summer learning and enrichment, and work-based learning opportunities.

As advocate and activist Marian Wright Edelman said, “It is the responsibility of every adult—especially parents, educators, and religious leaders—to make sure that children hear what we have learned from the lessons of life and to hear over and over that we love them and that they are not alone.” Mentorship is vital to fulfilling this responsibility, expanding opportunity, and helping our children fulfill their God-given potential.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 2022 as National Mentoring Month. I call upon Americans across the country to observe this month with mentoring, appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-sixth.

[FR Doc. 2022-00167

Billing code 3395-F2-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:18-mj-00061-KAJ Doc #: 10 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 30
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:18-mj-00061-KAJ Doc #: 10 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 31
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JEFFREY ANTONIO BROWN, 

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:17-cv-080 

- vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

CHAE HARRIS, Warden, 

 Warren Correctional Institution, 

 : 

 Respondent. 

 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING “WRIT” FOR CERTIFICATE 

OF APPEALABILITY 

 

 This case is before the Court on Petitioner’s “Writ” for Certificate of Appealability (ECF 

No. 92). As the Court has previously explained to Petitioner, litigants do not have authority to 

issue writs, which are court orders. Because in the first paragraph of the document, Petitioner 

“requests” a certificate of appealability, the Court will treat this filing as a motion. 

 Petitioner seeks a certificate of appealability “on all claims.” On May 4, 2018, the Court 

dismissed his Petition with prejudice, including all the claims made in the case (ECF No. 53). 

Petitioner is correct that decisions on certificates of appealability are to be made in the first instance 

by the District Court. Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997). To carry out that 

policy, the Supreme Court enacted Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Proceedings which 

provides that “[t]he district court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a 

final judgment adverse to the applicant.” 
2 

 As required by Rule 11(a), this Court already denied a certificate of appealability when it 

entered judgment dismissing all claims (Decision and Order, ECF No. 53, at PageID 3965). On 

May 31, 2018, Petitioner filed his “Writ for New Trial” (ECF No. 69) which the Court denied on 

June 18, 2018 (ECF No. 75). No certificate of appealability determination was made in that Order 

because it was not deciding any habeas corpus grounds for relief. The Court advised Petitioner in 

that Order that the May 4, 2018, decision with the accompanying judgment was “a final appealable 

order of this Court which Petitioner may appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upon 

obtaining from that court a certificate of appealability . . .” (ECF No. 75, PageID 4088; emphasis 

added). Thereafter on July 10, 2018, Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 90). 

 The filing of a Notice of Appeals deprives this Court of jurisdiction to reconsider its denial 

of a certificate of appealability. Filing a notice of appeal divests the District Court of jurisdiction 

over a case and vests jurisdiction in the Circuit Court of Appeals until the district court receives 

the mandate of the court of appeals. Marrese v. American Academy of Osteopathic Surgeons, 470 

U.S. 373 (1985); Pickens v. Howes, 549 F.3d 377, 381 (6th Cir. 2008); Pittock v. Otis Elevator Co., 

8 F.3d 325, 327 (6th Cir. 1993); Lewis v. Alexander, 987 F.2d 392, 394 (6th Cir. 1993); Cochran v. 

Birkel, 651 F.2d 1219, 1221 (6th Cir. 1981). 

 Therefore Petitioner’s Motion (styled as a “Writ”) is denied for lack of jurisdiction. 

August 17, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 _____________________________ 

 Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of World Am, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A.
        Hovee, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  August 14, 2008
              /s/
                  Robert A. HoveeBy:
                  Robert A. HoveeIts:
                  President
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        World Am, Inc. and will be retained by World Am, Inc. and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.