alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William Cook, Plaintiff, v Freight Force, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Nassau County,

May 20, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein*for plaintiff. *Alio Leahy & Dent*for Joseph Panzarelli, defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

John S. Lockman, J.

Unopposed motion by plaintiff for a default judgment against defendant Joseph Panzarelli (hereinafter defendant) is denied.

Plaintiff rejected the unverified letter answer of the defendant, *pro se,*the day it was received and now seeks a default judgment based upon defendant’s default in answering. Plaintiff may treat an unverified pleading as a nullity, provided "he *460gives notice with due diligence to the attorney of the adverse party that he elects to do so” (CPLR 3022).

For the purposes of this motion, it is assumed, arguendo, that CPLR 3022 applies in a case where the defendant is appearing *pro se,*and thus has no "attorney” upon whom a rejection notice may be served.

The rejection notice here, although timely served, was defective. "[I]f the aggrieved party chooses to treat the unverified pleading as a nullity, and timely serves the required notice on his adversary, said notice must particularize reasons why the verification is defective or, in its absence, why it is required” *(State of New York v McMahon,*78 Misc 2d 388, 389). The notice served upon defendant failed to state why a verified answer was required, and thus was insufficient to justify return of the pleading. "Pleaders insisting upon strict compliance with the rules of practice must follow the same themselves” *(Treen Motors Corp. v Van Pelt,*106 Misc 357, 361).

The letter/answer served by defendant also was sufficient in other respects. It contained a plain and concise statement of the material facts, sufficiently denied the allegations of the complaint and was subscribed with the name of the defendant. The absence of a statement of venue or title was not fatal *(see, Edwards v La Quay,*20 Misc 2d 847, 848). In light of CPLR 3026, which directs defects to be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced, the letter is deemed an answer and properly interposed in this action *(see, Capital Newspapers Division-Hearst Corp. v Vanderbilt,*44 Misc 2d 542, 543-544).

Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of the papers submitted on this motion upon defendant, with a copy of this order resolving the application in favor of defendant, as plaintiff failed to serve a copy of the papers prior to submission.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-268-1

Christopher A. Braden 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 37) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 3 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: January 24, 2018 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:17-cr-00268-JLG Doc #: 47 Filed: 01/24/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 85
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4433 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4433

 To make the antitrust laws applicable to a political committee under 
  the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which is established and 
administered by a separate segregated fund of a corporation pursuant to 
                   section 316(b)(2)(C) of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2010

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make the antitrust laws applicable to a political committee under 
  the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which is established and 
administered by a separate segregated fund of a corporation pursuant to 
                   section 316(b)(2)(C) of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST LAWS TO CORPORATE PACS.

    The antitrust laws shall apply to a political committee under the 
Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which is established and 
administered by a separate segregated fund of a corporation pursuant to 
section 316(b)(2)(C) of such Act, and in accordance with such laws, a 
political committee for multiple legal entities in the same business 
shall be prohibited.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``antitrust laws'' has the 
meaning given such term in the 1st section of the Clayton Act, except 
that such term includes section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act 
to the extent that such section 5 applies to unfair methods of 
competition.
                                 <all>
```
Part IV


                 SAGEBRUSH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

                  EXHIBIT 21 - SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES



                                     STATE OF INCORPORATION
NAME:*                                   OR ORGANIZATION

Chardent, Inc.                             Delaware
Spicewood, Inc.                            Delaware
Sagebrush of Tennessee, L.P.               Delaware
Sagebrush of North Carolina, LLC           North Carolina
Kingsport Foods, Inc.                      Tennessee
Knoxville Foods, Inc.                      Tennessee
Oak Ridge Foods, Inc.                      Tennessee
Sagebrush of Sevierville, Inc.             Tennessee
Sagebrush DTN, Inc.                        Tennessee
Tumbleweed of Pigeon Forge, Inc.           Tennessee
Sagebrush of South Carolina, LLC           South Carolina





















______
* All such corporations, other than Chardent, Inc. and Spicewood, Inc.,
  do business under the name "Sagebrush Steakhouse & Saloon."
Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Patrick J.
Dyson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Patrick J. Dyson
-------------------
Patrick J. Dyson
Director and Principal Executive Officer

May 15, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark J. Emkjer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Accelrys, Inc. (the "Company"), and I, David M. Sankaran, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | /s/MARK J. EMKJERMark J. Emkjer
President and Chief Executive Officer                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/DAVID M. SANKARANDavid M. Sankaran
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| | Date: June 10, 2005                                                                    

This
certification will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Likewise, irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in any such filing, such certification will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Exchange Act,
whether made before or after the date of the Report, except to the extent the registrant expressly incorporates such certification by reference into such filing.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 06 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTION
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350 , chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Subjex Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the
"Company"), does certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on
Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that: (1) the 10-QSB
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the 10-QSB
Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of the Company.


****


****By  /s/ Andrew
      HyderAndrew
      Hyder, CEO (acting CFO)
      May
      13, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4186 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4186

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for 2 years the 
treatment of certain farming business machinery and equipment as 5-year 
                 property for purposes of depreciation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2009

  Mr. Pomeroy (for himself, Mr. Herger, Ms. Herseth Sandlin, and Mr. 
 Braley of Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for 2 years the 
treatment of certain farming business machinery and equipment as 5-year 
                 property for purposes of depreciation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FARMING BUSINESS MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT TREATED AS 
              5-YEAR PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Clause (vii) of section 168(e)(3)(B) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 5-year property) is amended by 
striking ``January 1, 2010'' and inserting ``January 1, 1012''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.21  ZORAN CORPORATION  2008 EXECUTIVE OFFICER BONUS POLICY  This 2008 Executive Officer Bonus Policy applies to the executive
officers (Participants) of Zoran
Corporation (Zoran) for fiscal 2008:  1.The target bonus amount for
each Participant shall be a percentage of the Participants base salary (Target Bonus).  The target percentage for each of the
executive officers of Zoran, as determined by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors (Committee)
shall be as follows:  Executive Officer
  
  Target Bonus
  (% of base salary)Dr. Levy Gerzberg, President and Chief
  Executive Officer
  
  100
  %Karl Schneider, Chief Financial Officer
  
  70
  %Dr. Isaac Shenberg, Senior Vice
  President
  
  60
  %  2.The measures of financial
performance determining achievement of 67% of Target Bonuses shall be revenues
of Zoran for fiscal 2008 (one-fourth of such amount) and fiscal 2008 non-GAAP
earnings per share of Zoran (three-fourths of such amount).  3.The specific levels of
revenues and non-GAAP earnings per share at which 100% achievement of Target
Bonus may be attained shall be the levels of revenues and non-GAAP earnings per
share that are set forth in the Companys Annual Operating Plan as approved by
the Board of Directors, with minimum and maximum performance set at 80% and
120% respectively.  4.The specific objectives
determining achievement of 33% of Target Bonus for each Participant other than
the Chief Executive Officer shall be the objectives approved by the Committee
based on recommendations by the Chief Executive Officer.  5.The Target Bonus of the
Companys Chief Executive Officer shall be determined based on the corporate
financial goals identified in paragraph 3, subject to the discretion of the
Committee to reduce or increase the bonus based on such factors as it deems
appropriate.  6.The Company shall accrue
annual bonuses for all employees of the Company; executive officers, general
managers and vice presidents of Zoran shall not be entitled to receive bonuses
that, in the aggregate, exceed 25% of the accrued bonus pool.  7.Non-GAAP pre-tax earnings per
share consists of Zorans GAAP pre-tax earnings per share for fiscal 2008,
adjusted to eliminate share-based compensation expenses, amortization of
acquired intangible assets and income tax expense.  8.Only persons employed by
Zoran at the end of the fiscal year and at the time of payment are eligible to
receive bonuses under this plan, pro rata to their service during the year.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

SHERWOOD GLENN FOSTER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COUGHLIN AUTO GROUP, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01054 

JUDGE MICHAEL H. WATSON 

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Now come the undersigned attorneys for the respective parties, pursuant to Civil Rule of 

Procedure 41(a), and hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action has been resolved and is 

dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to all claims, with each party to bear its own attorney 

fees, expenses, and court costs. 

/s/ Rachel A. Sabo 

Rachel A. Sabo, Esq. 

Peter G. Friedmann, Esq. 

The Friedmann Firm LLC 

1457 S. High Street 

Columbus, OH 43207 

Rachel@TheFriedmannFirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Roland J. De Monte _____ 

Roland J. De Monte (0081129) 

Michael J. Kozimor (0092376) 

Jackson Lewis P.C. 

Park Center Plaza I, Suite 400 

6100 Oak Tree Boulevard 

Cleveland, OH 44131 

(216) 750-0404 

(216) 750-0826 (Fax) 

Roland.DeMonte@JacksonLewis.com

Michael.Kozimor@JacksonLewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Coughlin Chevrolet, Inc. d/b/a 

Coughlin Automotive Group

Case: 2:17-cv-01054-MHW-CMV Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 56
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This to certify that on this 22nd day of August, 2018, the foregoing was filed with the Court 

and sent to all parties of record via the Court’s electronic filing system. 

/s/ Roland J. De Monte _____ 

Roland J. De Monte (0081129) 

One of the Attorneys for Defendant, 

Coughlin Chevrolet, Inc. d/b/a 

Coughlin Automotive Group 

4822-5122-7760, v. 1

Case: 2:17-cv-01054-MHW-CMV Doc #: 15 Filed: 08/22/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 57
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17303 and #17304; KENTUCKY Disaster Number KY-00088]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4630-DR), dated 01/06/2022. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Flooding, and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         12/10/2021 through 12/11/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 01/06/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/07/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/06/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 01/06/2022, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Caldwell, Christian, Fulton, Graves, Hart, Hickman, Hopkins, Logan, Lyon, Marion, Marshall, Muhlenberg, Ohio, Taylor, Todd, Warren The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17303 C and for economic injury is 17304 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Barbara Carson, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2022-00519 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-246

Judge Marbley

Shane Ryan Hammond 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 23) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s pleas of guilty to Counts 1-5 of the Superseding

Information, and he is hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The

Court will defer the decision of whether to accept the plea

agreement until the sentencing hearing.

Date: June 22, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge
Order filed September 3, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00455-CR

____________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

SAMUEL ROBIN REYNOLDS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 14

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2312092

O R D E R

The State’s brief was due August 17, 2020. No brief or motion to extend time 

has been filed. If the State does not file a brief by September 14, 2020, we will 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. State v. Bissing, 169 S.W.3d 729, 730 

(Tex. App.—Waco 2005, no pet.); State v. Garza, 88 S.W.3d 353, 354–55 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio 2002, no pet.) (per curiam); State v. Palacios, 968 S.W.2d 467, 

468 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1998, no pet.) (per curiam).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL EVANS, et al., i Case No. 1:18-cv-33
Plaintiffs, Judge Timothy S. Black
vs. :
COLERAIN RV,
Defendant.
ORDER

This civil action is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to drop
Plaintiff Myron Terlecky from this action. (Doc. 27). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21, a
district court may “at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party.” Upon review of
Plaintiffs’ motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff Terlecky no longer has an interest in this
litigation and that dropping Plaintiff Terlecky as a party is just. Moreover, Defendant’s
lack of objection to the motion “coupled with the considerable discretion afforded to
judges via Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21,” Little Realty Co., LLC v. PVR Utica Gas
Gathering, LLC, No. 2:16-CV-00177, 2018 WL 3105951, at *3 (S.D. Ohio June 25,
2018), supports granting the motion. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion (Doc. 27) is
GRANTED and Plaintiff Terlecky is dropped as a party in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: PAL fsa Hinata Cloak
TimothyS-Black

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4395 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
     include the Gettysburg Train Station, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GETTYSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK BOUNDARY REVISION.

    Section 1 of the Act titled ``An Act to revise the boundary of the 
Gettysburg National Military Park in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 
and for other purposes'', approved August 17, 1990 (16 U.S.C. 430g-4), 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Additional Land.--In addition to the land identified in 
subsections (a) and (b), the park shall also include the following, as 
depicted on the map titled `Gettysburg National Military Park Proposed 
Boundary Addition', numbered 305/80,045 and dated January 2010:
            ``(1) The land and interests in land commonly known as the 
        `Gettysburg Train Station' and its immediate surroundings in 
        the Borough of Gettysburg.
            ``(2) The land and interests in land located along Plum Run 
        in Cumberland Township.''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF LAND.

    Section 2 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 430g-5) is amended by adding at 
the end of subsection (a) the following: ``The Secretary is also 
authorized to acquire publicly owned property within the area defined 
in section 1(d)(1) by purchase, from willing sellers only, if efforts 
to acquire that property without cost have been exhausted. The 
Secretary may not acquire property within the area defined in section 
1(d) by eminent domain.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
     include the Gettysburg Train Station, and for other purposes.
```