alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Jennifer Inlow, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:17cv163 

Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendant. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on August 28, 2018 (Doc. 16). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file 

objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. 

Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report 

and Recommendation have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) of 

the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The parties Joint Motion for Attorney 

Fees (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees and costs in the 

amount of $6,500.00 consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge 

United States District Court
NINO CHET TARTARINI

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3753

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 26, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela Cox , Judge

.

Rick A. Sichta, Susanne K. Sichta, and Joe Hamrick of The Sichta Firm, LLC,

Jacksonville , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, and Jillian H. Reding, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., ROWE

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 10.56

Grant of Options to Non-Employee Directors

On June 27, 2007, Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") granted to each non-employee member of theCompany's Board of Directors, consisting of Messrs. Jere Drummond, Kamran Elahian, Robert C. Hawk and Sam Srinivasan, an optionto purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Each of these options was granted under the Company's 1997 StockPlan, has an exercise price of $1.97 share and shall vest as to 25% of the shares subject to such option on each of the first fouranniversaries of the date of grant.
In the Senate of the United States, 

February 24, 2010. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 3961) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend title XVIII of 

the Social Security Act to reform the Medicare SGR payment 

system for physicians and to reinstitute and update the PayAs-You-Go requirement of budget neutrality on new tax and 

mandatory spending legislation, enforced by the threat of annual, automatic sequestration.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 

following: 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUNSETS. 

2 (a) USA PATRIOT IMPROVEMENT AND REAUTHOR3 IZATION ACT OF 2005.—Section 102(b)(1) of the USA PA4 TRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 

5 (Public Law 109–177; 50 U.S.C. 1805 note, 50 U.S.C. 1861 

6 note, and 50 U.S.C. 1862 note) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘February 28, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘February 28, 2011’’. 
2 

† HR 3961 EAS 

1 (b) INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVEN2 TION ACT OF 2004.—Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence 

3 Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 

4 108–458; 118 Stat. 3742; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended 

5 by striking ‘‘February 28, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘February 

6 28, 2011’’. 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement 

and Reauthorization Act of 2005 and Intelligence Reform 

and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 until February 

28, 2011.’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 3961 

AMENDMENTS
Exhibit 10.45


 


Lease Agreement of Coking Operations


 


	 	Party A:	Pingdingshan Hongfeng Coal Processing and Coking, Ltd..


 


	 	Party B:	Henan Province Pingdingshan Hongli Coal and Coke Co., Ltd.


 


Parties A and B, through mutual negotiations,
and in light of Party A being the trustee of Pingdingshan Hongyetai Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Hongyetai”),
agree in Pingdingshan on April 8, 2015, as follows:


 


	 	1.	Party B shall lease Hongyetai’s No. 1 coke furnace (200,000 metric tons capacity) from Party A for coke processing.


 


	 	2.	The lease term is one year.


 


	 	3.	During the lease term, Party A may not engage in any activities outside the scope of the activities set forth in the business license.


 


	 	4.	Party B shall be solely responsible to arrange production staff and management personnel for the No. 1 coke furnace.


 


	 	5.	Party A shall charge a lease fee of RMB 60 per metric ton of coke produced. Party B shall be solely responsible for salaries and equipment maintenance fees incurred in connection with the No. 1 coke furnace.


 


	 	6.	The parties may file lawsuits to resolve dispute arising from this agreement to the court where this agreement was entered into.


 


	 	7.	This agreement shall be made in four copies, with Parties A and B each holding two, and shall become effective upon the parties’ seal.


 


	Party A:	 	Party B:
	 	 	 
	[seal of Pingdingshan Hongfeng	 	[seal of Henan Province Pingdingshan
	Coal Processing and Coking, Ltd.]	 	Hongli Coal & Coke Co., Ltd.] 
	 	 	 
	 	 	April 8, 2015
* Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1592
DONALD L. MCINTIRE, SR., Petitioner, versus CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-1143-BLA) Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, * Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Donald L. McIntire, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. William Steele Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, Morgantown, West Virginia; Patricia MayNece, Dorothy L. Page, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C. for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. McIntire v. Consolidation Coal Co. , BRB No. 96-1143-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 14, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Официален вестник C 436/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 436 |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 5824 декември 2015 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 436

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 5824 декември 2015 г.

---

| Известие No | Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Информация |
| | ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ |
| | Европейски парламентСъвет |
| 2015/C 436/01 | Изявление относно Регламент (ЕС, Евратом) 2015/2422 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 16 декември 2015 г. за изменение на Протокол No 3 относно статута на Съда на Европейския съюз | 1 |

Известие No

Съдържание

Страница

IV   Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Европейски парламентСъвет

2015/C 436/01

Изявление относно Регламент (ЕС, Евратом) 2015/2422 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 16 декември 2015 г. за изменение на Протокол No 3 относно статута на Съда на Европейския съюз

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

IV Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Европейски парламент Съвет

| 24.12.2015 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2015

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 436/1

---

Изявление относно Регламент (ЕС, Евратом) 2015/2422 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 16 декември 2015 г. за изменение на Протокол No 3 относно статута на Съда на Европейския съюз (1)

(2015/C 436/01)

След приключване на процеса на реформа Общият съд ще се състои от двама съдии от държава членка. Следователно, за да се постигне равенство между жените и мъжете, което е една от целите на Европейския съюз съгласно член 3 ДЕС, правителствата на държавите членки следва във възможно най-голяма степен да гарантират равнопоставено присъствие на жените и мъжете в процеса на предлагане на кандидати за съдии в Общия съд на Европейския съюз в съответствие с член 254 ДФЕС.

---

(1)  ОВ L 341, 24.12.2015 г., стр. 14

---
Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 1 of 21  PAGEID #: 5901

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 2 of 21  PAGEID #: 5902

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 3 of 21  PAGEID #: 5903

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 4 of 21  PAGEID #: 5904

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 5 of 21  PAGEID #: 5905

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 6 of 21  PAGEID #: 5906

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 7 of 21  PAGEID #: 5907

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 8 of 21  PAGEID #: 5908

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 9 of 21  PAGEID #: 5909

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 10 of 21  PAGEID #: 5910

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 11 of 21  PAGEID #: 5911

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 12 of 21  PAGEID #: 5912

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 13 of 21  PAGEID #: 5913

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 14 of 21  PAGEID #: 5914

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 15 of 21  PAGEID #: 5915

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 16 of 21  PAGEID #: 5916

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 17 of 21  PAGEID #: 5917

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 18 of 21  PAGEID #: 5918

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 19 of 21  PAGEID #: 5919

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 20 of 21  PAGEID #: 5920

Case: 2:17-cv-01093-MHW-EPD Doc #: 184 Filed: 11/07/18 Page: 21 of 21  PAGEID #: 5921
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-9 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 82
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-9 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 83
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-9 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 84
```

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dennis L. Mast, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of HydroFlo, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15-(e)) for the registrant and have:

        a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

        b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

        a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004                      /s/ DENNIS L. MAST
                                             Dennis L. Mast
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             Chief Financial Officer
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc.(the "Company")
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mark Clancy
---------------------------------
Mark Clancy
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Date: September 27, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors


Open Text Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-87024, 333‐109505, 333-121377, 333-146350, 333-146351) on Form S-8 of Open Text Corporation of our reports dated August 10, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Open Text Corporation as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2012, and all related financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, which reports appear in the June 30, 2012 annual report on Form 10-K of Open Text Corporation.





/s/ KPMG LLP


Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants


Toronto, Canada


August 10, 2012
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of UHY LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-88568, 333-31414, and 333-34411) on form S-3 and (No. 333-132208, 333-85606 and 333-40230) on Form S-8 of Velocity Express Corporation and subsidiaries, of our report dated
October 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Velocity Express Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year-ended June 30, 2007.



| |  |  |  |             |  | 
| |  |  |  | ----------- |  | 
| |  |  |  | /s/ UHY LLP |  | 

Hartford, Connecticut

October 15, 2007
To: Wienke TaxIR9IUSEPAIUS@EPA, 

Cc: Joe Cassmassi cjcassmassi@aqmd.gov~, Bong-Mann Kim <bkim@aqmd.gov>, 

BCC: 

Subject: FW: NH3 numbers for SCAB 

From: Kathy Hsiao ckhsiaol @aqmd.gov> - Friday 1012912010 0852 AM 

History: This message has been replied to. 

Wienke, 

Per your request. Off-road mobile ammonia emissions are not available in the 2007 AQMP. 

Kathy 

From: Bong-Mann Kim 

Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:45 AM 

To: Kathy Hsiao 

Subject: RE: NH3 numbers for SCAB 

Kathy, 

2005 and 2014 baseline ammonia emissions are summarized below. 

2005 2014 base 

tons/day tonslday 

Stationary 7 5 68 

On-Road Mobile 29 15 

Off-Road Mobile 0 0 

Total 104 83 

Bong
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

John W. Perotti,

 Plaintiff

v. Case No. 1:01-cv-53

Harold Carter, et al.,

 Defendants

______________________

ORDER

______________________

 The above captioned case was dismissed on February 27, 2003. Therefore, IT

IS ORDERED that all SEALED DOCUMENT(S) (Doc. 138) be returned to the

custody of the filing party.

July 31, 2007 s/Sandra S. Beckwith 

Date Sandra S. Beckwith, Chief Judge

 United States District Court

Case 1:01-cv-00053-SSB-TSH Document 166 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

RAHSON STAPLES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CODEY JILLERAT, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Case No. 1:17-cv-742

 Judge Timothy S. Black

 Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 32)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate 

Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on October 30, 2018, submitted a 

Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 32). No objections were filed.

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo 

all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in 

its entirety. 

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 31) is 

DENIED.

2) Plaintiff is advised of the following:
2

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4), Plaintiff may file, within thirty (30) days 

after service of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation, a motion with the 

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal. Callihan v. 

Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States 

Postal Service, 105 F.3d 274 (6th Cir. 1997). Plaintiff’s motion must include a copy of 

the affidavit filed in the District Court and the District Court's statement of the reasons 

for denying pauper status on appeal. Id.; see Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).

Plaintiff is notified that if he does not file a motion within thirty (30) days of 

receiving notice of the District Court's decision as required by Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5),

or fails to pay the required filing fee of $505.00 within this same time period, the appeal 

will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Callihan, 178 F.3d at 804. Once dismissed 

for want of prosecution, the appeal will not be reinstated, even if the filing fee or motion 

for pauper status is subsequently tendered, unless plaintiff can demonstrate that he did not 

receive notice of the District Court's decision within the time period prescribed for by 

Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). Id.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

11/21/18
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accessory Specialists Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ AnthonyDeMint                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 9, 2005
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00156-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.C, A.M., AND A.C., CHILDREN,

From the 74th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2003-1548-3

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant is appealing the trial court’s Order of Termination (of her parental 

rights), which was signed on January 17, 2010. Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal was 

filed in the trial court on April 16, 2010.

The notice of appeal must have been filed within 20 days after the judgment was 

signed, (see TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(a) (Vernon 2008)); TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b)), or 

a motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal must have been filed within 15 

days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.

We notified Appellant in a letter dated May 11, 2010 that her appeal might be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless she filed a response within 21 days showing 

grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant has not responded.
In the Interest of A.C., A.M., and A.C., Children Page 2

Appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely to invoke our jurisdiction. This 

appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 16, 2010

[CV06]