alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on November 22, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Open Source Imaging Consortium, Inc. (“Open Source Imaging Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Open Source Imaging Consortium intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 20, 2019, Open Source Imaging Consortium filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 12, 2019 (84 FR 14973).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 5, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 25, 2021 (86 FR 28152).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-00580 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4425 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4425

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, as the ``Martin G. `Marty' 
                          Mahar Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2010

Mr. Tonko (for himself, Mr. Bishop of New York, Mr. Israel, Mr. King of 
  New York, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Meeks of New 
York, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Nadler of New York, Mr. Weiner, Ms. Clarke, Ms. 
  Velazquez, Mr. McMahon, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Engel, Mrs. 
 Lowey, Mr. Hall of New York, Mr. Murphy of New York, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. 
 Owens, Mr. Arcuri, Mr. Maffei, Mr. Lee of New York, Mr. Higgins, Ms. 
 Slaughter, Mr. Massa, and Mr. Rangel) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, as the ``Martin G. `Marty' 
                          Mahar Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARTIN G. ``MARTY'' MAHAR POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Martin G. `Marty' Mahar Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Martin G. 
`Marty' Mahar Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
SERVED JULY 20, 2010 


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICEOF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 1,1 

IN THE MATTER OF 


ROSL YNE MARIE ELDER, 


Respondent. 


FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0004 


(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 


DMS NO. F AA-20 1 0-315 


ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING 

For good cause shown, and in the absence of any objection from the 

Respondent, the motion of counsel for the Complainant to continue the 

hearing, now scheduled to begin on July 29,2010, is granted. 

The new hearing date is August 12,2010, and the venue remains Las 

Vegas, NY. A notice specifying the location and time of the rescheduled 

hearing will be issued shortly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Isaa D. Benkin 

Administrative law Judge 
FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COpy 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Edward A. Lopez, Respondent's Former Counsel 

Venture Corporate Center 

3440 Hollywood Blvd. Suite 415 

Hollywood, FL 33021 

TEL: 954-241-4205 

FAX: 954-241-4206 

Roslyne Marie Elder, Respondent 

835 Sierra Vista Drive, Apt. 326 

Las Vegas,:t\T\l 89169 

TEL: 702-412-5640 

Y olandia Ayala Bernal, Complainant's Counsel 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E3; YAB 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5070 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

I
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** March 11, 2014
N o. 04

- 14

- 00136

- CR Billy Edward GONZALEZ , Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas Trial Court No. 12

- CR

- 611 Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding


### ORDER The clerk’s record was due December 30, 2014. 1 On March 3, 2014, we issued a letter to the district clerk of Starr County, Mr. Eloy R. Garcia, advising him that the record was overdue. We further advised the clerk that if the record had not been filed because appellant has failed to pay for the record and is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee, the clerk must filed a notification of late record within ten days of the date of the letter. Otherwise , the record was due within thirty days of the date of the letter.
On March 5, 2014, in response to our letter, the clerk filed a notification of late record stating appellant has failed to pay for t he record and is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. However, our records indicate appellant had appointed trial counsel and appointed counsel has not withdrawn and is thereby presumed to still represent appellant on appeal.

1 The notice of appeal was not received in this court until February 27, 2014.Under Texas law, criminal defendants are not entitled to court

- appointed counsel unless they are indigent. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. art. 26.04. Thus, appellant was clearly indigent at trial. Once appellant was found indigent, he is presumed to have remained indigent fo r the remainder of the proceedings , including appeal, absent a factual determination of a material change in his financial circumstances. See Cates v. State , 402 S.W.3d 250, 251 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC . art. 26.04(p). Our records do not indicate, nor have we been advised of any finding by the trial court, that appellant’s financial circumstances have changed. Accordingly, appellant is presumed indigent and the clerk may not refuse to file the clerk’s record because appellant has not paid for the record ; appellant is entitled to a free record on appeal

. We therefore DENY the district clerk’s notification of late record and ORDER the district clerk to file a proper notification of late record on or before March 17, 2014 , or file the clerk’s record in this court on or before April 2, 2014.
We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the district clerk, the court reporter, and the trial court.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
<CURRENCY>     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          77,852
<SECURITIES>                                    81,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    196,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               413,231
<PP&E>                                         250,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 233,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 589,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,804,910
<BONDS>                                      1,015,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,572
<COMMON>                                         5,713
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,252,182)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   589,013
<SALES>                                        243,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               360,020
<CGS>                                           49,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  439,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (176,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (176,659)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (176,659)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
HAMILTON COUNTY JOB Case No. 1:17-cv-855
AND FAMILY SERVICES, Black, J.
Plaintiff, Litkovitz, M.J.
vs.
JATYANAH BEY, REPORT AND
Defendant. RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on defendant Jaiyanah Bey’s motion to strike (Doc. 9) and
motion for summary judgment (Doc. 10). On December 22, 2017, the undersigned issued a
Report and Recommendation recommending that Ms. Bey’s petition for removal be denied and
the case be remanded to the state court because this federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction
over this case. (Doc. 4). In view of the previously filed Report and Recommendation, Ms.
Bey’s motions to strike (Doc. 9) and for summary judgment (Doc. 10) should be DENIED as

moot.

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

Karen L. Litkovitz
United States Magistrate Judge

Date: _S /p /Z8. Khu, i hla


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

HAMILTON COUNTY JOB Case No. 1:17-cv-855
AND FAMILY SERVICES, Black, J.

Plaintiff, Litkovitz, M.J.

vs.
JAITYANAH BEY,

Defendant.

NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written
objections to this Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after
being served with a copy thereof. That period may be extended further by the Court on timely
motion by either side for an extension of time. All objections shall specify the portion(s) of the
R&R objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the
objections. A party shall respond to an opponent’s objections within FOURTEEN DAYS after
being served with a copy of those objections. Failure to make objections in accordance with this
procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States

v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anton J. Drescher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. this report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or  15(d) of the 1934 Act, and  2. the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of  operations of the registrant.  By: /s/ Anton J. Drescher ------------------------------------ Name: Anton J. Drescher Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer  Date:August 15, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3951 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3951

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Roy Rondeno, 
                       Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ROY RONDENO, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Roy Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roy 
Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Sinoenergy Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bo
      Huang, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Qiong (Laby) Wu, the Chief Financial
      Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


August
                    10, 2007
                  
                  /s/
                      Bo HuangBo
                        Huang
                      Chief
                        Executive Officer
 /s/
                        Qiong (Laby) WuQiong
                            (Laby) Wu
                          Chief
                            Financial
                            Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Headwaters Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Kirk A. Benson      |  | 
|Kirk A. Benson          |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|November 19, 2007       |  | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Steven G. Stewart   |  | 
|Steven G. Stewart       |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|November 19, 2007       |  |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the yearly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (PPD) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Daniel G. Darazsdi, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Date: February 24, 2009



| |  |                         |  | 
| |  | ----------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ Daniel G. Darazsdi  |  | 
| |  | Daniel G. Darazsdi      |  | 
| |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |
Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LCA-Vision Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Stephen N. Joffe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alan H. Buckey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Stephen N. Joffe

/s/ Alan H. Buckey

Stephen N. Joffe

Alan H. Buckey

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

March 21, 2003

March 21, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION, DAYTON

SCOTT NESTOR, Individually and as 

Administrator for Hudson Nestor, : 

Deceased, et al. : 

: Case No. 3:17-cv-0093 

Plaintiff : 

: Judge Rose 

Vs. : 

: 

EVERLAST ROOFING, INC., et. al., : 

: 

Defendants : 

 JUDGMENT ENTRY

This case came for trial before a jury commencing October 9, 2018. The jury answered 

Interrogatories as follows: 

• For Liability Interrogatory #1A, “Were the Defendants, Everlast Roofing, Inc. and/or 

James Dunkel negligent” the jury answered “YES.” 

• For Liability Interrogatory #1B, “Was the Defendants’ negligence a proximate cause or 

contributing cause of the collision” the jury answered “NO.” 

Where the responses to the above were given, the jury signed and returned a general verdict in 

favor of Defendants James Dunkel and Everlast Roofing, Inc. Based on the above, the Court enters 

final judgment in favor of Defendants James Dunkel and Everlast Roofing, Inc. 

Costs to be paid by Plaintiffs. 

November 7, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

Judge Thomas M. Rose
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 26
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 2 of 8 PAGEID #: 27
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 3 of 8 PAGEID #: 28
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 4 of 8 PAGEID #: 29
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 5 of 8 PAGEID #: 30
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 6 of 8 PAGEID #: 31
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 7 of 8 PAGEID #: 32
Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 8 of 8 PAGEID #: 33
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-266 (2)

Judge Marbley

Junior Castaneda-Paz 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 62) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The Court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: September 25, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge