alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7507

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM DON RODGERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-93-231)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Don Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Don Rodgers appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2)

(West Supp. 1999) and motion for correction of PSI report under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(D). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Rodgers, No. CR-93-231 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, W. Gordon Lancaster, Chief Financial Officer, of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that: (a) the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related
interpretations; and (b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. * * * Chief Financial Officer By:
    
    /s/ W. Gordon LancasterW. Gordon Lancaster
 Date: August 3, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Robert H. Arents, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:17cv184 

Norfolk Southern Corporation, Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendant. 

ORDER

Pursuant to notification by the Magistrate Judge on December 14, 2020 that this matter 

is settled; 

It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any 

of the parties may, upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days, reopen the action. 

The Court retains jurisdiction. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

 Michael R. Barrett, Judge 

United States District Court 

Case: 1:17-cv-00184-MRB Doc #: 28 Filed: 12/15/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 82
MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00349-CV

Drake Interiors, L.L.C., Appellant

v.

Andrea Marie Thomas and Robert Warren 

Thomas, Appellees

Appealed from the 334th District Court of 

Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2009-22182). 

Substitute Opinion delivered by Justice 

Christopher. Justices Boyce and Brown 

also participating.

TO THE 334TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

This court today issued a substitute opinion. We order this court’s former 

judgment of April 3, 2014, vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s 

opinion of April 3, 2014, withdrawn. We deny the motions for rehearing filed by 

appellant, Drake Interiors, L.L.C., and by appellee, Andrea Marie Thomas.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Andrea Marie 

Thomas, signed March 20, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of 

the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance 

with the court’s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Andrea Marie Thomas.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court 

of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, August 4, 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

LESLIE M. GURLEY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:17-cv-410 

District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington 

DECISION AND ENTRY 

 This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion 

for Entry of Judgment with Remand. (Doc. #12). The parties stipulate and petition this 

Court to order remand of this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the 

fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to enter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 58. 

Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative 

Law Judge’s decision. The Commissioner will conduct further proceedings, offer the 

claimant an opportunity to attend a de novo hearing, develop the administrative record as 

necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social 

Security Act, and then issue a new decision. 
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 

1. The parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. #12) is 

ACCEPTED; 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 58; 

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to 

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with 

this Decision and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and 

4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: July 18, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose 

 Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the registrant and Sunil Bhonsle



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT dated this
15th day of June, 2010 between Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the “Company”) and Sunil Bhonsle (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to an
employment agreement dated May 16, 2009 (as amended by agreement dated February 17, 2010, the “Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the compensation provision of the Agreement will expire by its terms on June 30, 2010 and the Company and Executive wish to
amend the Agreement to provide for uninterrupted service by the Executive 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the
premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 

 

	 	1.	Effective Date. The effective date of this Amendment Agreement (the “Effective Date”) is July 1, 2010. 


 

	 	2.	Trigger Date. The term Trigger Date as used in the Agreement shall be changed to December 31, 2010 


 

	 	3.	Miscellaneous. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment Agreement, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above
written. 
  

			
	TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Eurelio Cavalier

	Name:	 	Eurelio Cavalier
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Compensation Committee

  

	
	EXECUTIVE


			
		
		 	 /s/ Sunil Bhonsle

	Name:	 	Sunil Bhonsle
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          28,192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                       376
<INVENTORY>                                      7,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,712
<PP&E>                                           8,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,751
<SALES>                                         61,985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,985
<CGS>                                           22,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    51
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,505
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,505
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84


</TABLE>
# •
•
• FACILITY DESCRIPTION: AirEmission PermitNo. 13700011- 001 Page4

Taconite is mined from the North and South Thunderbird Mine. The mining operations include the removal ofoverburden material, removal ofwaste rock material, and mining oftaconite ore. The taconite is then loaded onto trucks and hauled to eitherthe North or South Crushers. The emission units at the North and South Crusher areas include primary and secondary crushing, crushed ore storage, and rail car loading operations. Crushed rock is conveyed to a domed storage facility and then loaded onto rail cars and is transported off-site. Intermediate products and byproducts includingbutnot limited to rock, railroad ballast, blast furnace trim and aggregate are sold by EVTAC. Mined ore truck dumping, primary and secondarycrushing, and rail car loading dust emissions are controlled bybaghouses.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4459 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4459

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish a 10-year term of 
   office for any individual appointed as the Assistant Secretary of 
  Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration), and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2010

   Mr. Wolf introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish a 10-year term of 
   office for any individual appointed as the Assistant Secretary of 
  Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration), and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY 
              (TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION).

    (a) In General.--Section 114(b) of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Appointment; Term of Office.--
            ``(1) Appointment.--The head of the Administration shall be 
        the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation 
        Security Administration). The Assistant Secretary shall be 
        appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent 
        of the Senate.
            ``(2) Qualifications.--The Assistant Secretary must--
                    ``(A) be a citizen of the United States; and
                    ``(B) have experience in a field directly related 
                to transportation or security.
            ``(3) Term of office.--The term of office of an individual 
        appointed as the Assistant Secretary shall be 10 years. An 
        Assistant Secretary may not serve more than one 10-year 
        term.''.
    (b) Technical Amendments.--Section 114 of such title is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``Department of 
        Transportation'' and inserting ``Department of Homeland 
        Security'';
            (2) in the heading for subsection (m)(1) by striking 
        ``under secretary'' and inserting ``assistant secretary''; and
            (3) by striking ``Under Secretary'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``Assistant Secretary''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to any individual appointed as the Assistant Secretary of 
Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CASE NO. 3:17¢r37
Plaintiff, : JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

v.
ROBERT PHELPS,

Defendant.

AGREED ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Government’s request for restitution on behalf of a
minor victim identified for purposes of this Agreed Order as “Chelsea.”

The United States and the Defendant Robert Phelps have reached an agreement that Title
18, United States Code, Section 2259 requires the Court to impose restitution for any offense under
Chapter 110, which applies to the conviction of possession of child pornography, in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2). There is no dispute between the
parties that the Defendant possessed at least one image of child pornography depicting the above-
identified minor.

The parties further agree that the victim seeking restitution in this case, is a victim as
defined in Section 2259, that is, an individual “harmed as a result of a commission of a crime under
this chapter [the Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Chapter of Title 18].” See 18

U.S.C. § 2259(c).


IT IS THEREFORE AGREED by the parties that Defendant Robert Phelps is liable for
a portion of the total harm/losses sought by the victim “Chelsea.” Accordingly, Defendant Robert
Phelps agrees to pay $9,000.00 as restitution for the victim identified above. Restitution shall be
paid to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, and shall
then be distributed to the victim through her counsel: Elaine T. Lenahan, Esq., Lenahan Law,
P.L.L.C., 2655 Villa Creek, Suite 204, Dallas, Texas, 75234. The specific payment details will be

set forth in detail in the Judgment and Commitment Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

thea

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

REVIEWED AND AGREED TO BY:

BENJAMIN C. GLASSMAN
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Gib
Amy M. Smith (0081712)
Assistant United States Attorney

(LM 2M

Robert Phelps 7
Defendant

© eet,

Scott A. Kelly &
Counsel for Defendarff Robert Phelps
#### *In re*Duenaz,

No. 91649;

*Leave to Appeal Denied August 30, 1991:*

Court of Appeals No. 131354.
# Službeni list C 15I/2016

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 015I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Svezak 59.16. siječnja 2016. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 015I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Svezak 59.16. siječnja 2016.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV.   Obavijesti |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Vijeće |
| 2016/C 015I/01 | Informacije o datumu početka primjene Uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1861 o izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 267/2012 o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Irana i Provedbene uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1862 o provedbi Uredbe (EU) br. 267/2012 o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Irana | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

IV.   Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Vijeće

2016/C 015I/01

Informacije o datumu početka primjene Uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1861 o izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 267/2012 o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Irana i Provedbene uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1862 o provedbi Uredbe (EU) br. 267/2012 o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Irana

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

IV. Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Vijeće

| 16.1.2016 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2016

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 15/1

---

Informacije o datumu početka primjene Uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1861 o izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 267/2012 o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Irana i Provedbene uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1862 o provedbi Uredbe (EU) br. 267/2012 o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Irana

(2016/C 15 I/01)

Uredba Vijeća (EU) 2015/1861 (1) i Provedbena uredba Vijeća (EU) 2015/1862 (2) stupile su na snagu 19. listopada 2015.

U skladu s člankom 2. drugim podstavkom Uredbe (EU) 2015/1861, odnosno Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/1862, te uredbe primjenjuju se od datuma iz članka 2. drugog podstavka Odluke Vijeća (ZVSP) 2015/1863 (3), tj. od datuma početka primjene Odluke (ZVSP) 2015/1863.

U Odluci (ZVSP) 2016/37 (4) Vijeće je navelo da je uvjet za primjenu Odluke Vijeća (ZVSP) 2015/1863 ispunjen te je u skladu s tim odlučilo da se ta Odluka primjenjuje od 16. siječnja 2016. Stoga se Uredba (EU) 2015/1861 i Provedbena uredba (EU) 2015/1862 također primjenjuju od 16. siječnja 2016.

---

(1)  SL L 274, 18.10.2015., str. 1.

(2)  SL L 274, 18.10.2015., str. 161.

(3)  Odluka Vijeća (ZVSP) 2015/1863 od 18. listopada 2015. o izmjeni Odluke 2010/413/ZVSP o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Irana (SL L 274, 18.10.2015., str. 174.)

(4)  Odluka Vijeća (ZVSP) 2016/37 od 16. siječnja 2016. o datumu početka primjene Odluke (ZVSP) 2015/1863 o izmjeni Odluke 2010/413/ZVSP o mjerama ograničavanja protiv Irana (SL L 11 I, 16.1.2016., str. 1.).

---
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of First Horizon  Pharmaceutical
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Mahendra G. Shah,  Ph.D.,  Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Mahendra G. Shah, Ph.D
---------------------------
Mahendra G. Shah, Ph.D.
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
August 13, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4427 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4427

 To provide a pay increase of 1.9 percent for members of the uniformed 
                     services for fiscal year 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2010

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide a pay increase of 1.9 percent for members of the uniformed 
                     services for fiscal year 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FISCAL YEAR 2011 INCREASE IN MILITARY BASIC PAY.

    (a) Waiver of Section 1009 Adjustment.--The adjustment to become 
effective during fiscal year 2011 required by section 1009 of title 37, 
United States Code, in the rates of monthly basic pay authorized 
members of the uniformed services shall not be made.
    (b) Increase in Basic Pay.--Effective on January 1, 2011, the rates 
of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services are 
increased by 1.9 percent.
                                 <all>
```