alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Orchid
Cellmark Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 5, 2010 |  | /S/    THOMAS A.
BOLOGNA                    
|                        |  | Thomas A. Bologna                           
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                        | 
|Dated: November 5, 2010 |  | /S/    JAMES F.
SMITH                       
|                        |  | James F. Smith                              
|                        |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|                        |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 23**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-07621) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1995 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74485) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1998 Long-TermStock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123522) pertaining to theLCA-Vision Inc. 2001 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-135414) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 2006 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, of ourreport dated February 27, 2007, except for Note 10, as to which the date is May 7, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of LCA-Vision Inc., and ourreports dated February 27, 2007, except for the effects of the material weakness described inthe sixth paragraph of such report, as to which the date is May 7, 2007, with respect toLCA-Vision Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of LCA-Vision Inc.,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2006.Cincinnati, Ohio
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

WASHINGTON PERES, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-0018
Plaintiff, Barrett, J.
Litkovitz, M.J.
vs.
THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND REPORT AND
LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND, et al., RECOMMENDATION
Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on defendant Third Federal Savings and Loan Association
of Cleveland’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ original complaint for failure to name a necessary
party and for failure to properly plead claims for fraud/misrepresentation and breach of contract.
(Doc. 2). On February 22, 2018, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint (Doc. 4), to which
defendant Third Federal filed an answer (Doc. 7).

In view of the filing of an amended complaint, which supersedes the original complaint,
see Calhoun v. Bergh, 769 F.3d 409, 410 (6th Cir. 2014), defendant Third Federal’s motion to
dismiss should be DENIED as moot. See Clark v. Johnston, 413 F. App’x 804, 811 (6th Cir.

2011).

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

Date: 2(22/) g

Karen L. Litkovitz
United States Magistrate Judge


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

WASHINGTON PERES, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-0018

Plaintiff, Barrett, J.
Litkovitz, M.J.

vs.

THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND, et al.,

Defendants.

NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of
the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the
proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on
timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected
to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report
and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral
hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such
portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the
assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections
WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in
accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140

(1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
#### People v Hilson,

No. 90474;

Court of Appeals No. 116761.
22152

#### The STATE, Respondent, v. David Eugene KEY, Appellant.

(319 S. E. (2d) 338)

Supreme Court

*414
      *Asst. Appellant Defender William Isaac Diggs,*Columbia, *for appellant.*

*Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock*and *Asst. Atty. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr.,*Columbia, *Sol. William L. Ferguson,*York, *for respondent.*

Submitted May 17, 1984.

Decided Aug. 7, 1984.

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant was arrested and found to be in possession of slightly under two ounces of marijuana. He was convicted under S. C. Code Ann. § 44-53-370 (Supp. 1983) of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. Appellant excepts to the trial judge’s instruction.

The judge charged the jury:

> I charge you that prima facie guilty as used in that Statute regarding possession of more than an ounce of marijuana, the Defendant is deemed guilty of intent to distribute unless evidence satisfying you to the contrary is presented. In other words, that prima facie case could be rebutted by other evidence. Upon the presentation of such evidence, it would be for you the jury to determine whether or not the State has proven the Defendant guilty of that charge beyond a reasonable doubt.

The charge could have been taken by the jury as requiring the defendant to personally rebut or explain his possession of more than one ounce of marijuana. Therefore, we hold the instruction constitutes reversible error. *State v. Legette,*S. C., 316 S. E. (2d) 411 (1984); *State v. Cooper,*279 S. C. 301, 306 S. E.*415(2d) 598 (1983). According, the judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Rodney Cottman,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:17cv170

Carespring, Inc., et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on July 20, 2017 (Doc. 7). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections 

to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 

F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and 

Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) of the 

Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s case is DISMSSED for want of 

prosecution and for failure to obey an Order by the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett

United States District Judge
```
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-32.1
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>hybridexhbit321-033104.txt
<DESCRIPTION>CERTIFICATION OF CEO PER SECTION 906
<TEXT>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350

      The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc.(the "Company")
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            s/s MARK CLANCY
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                 Mark Clancy
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 October 29, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hybrid Fuel Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
```
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  JCP&L  Transition  Funding  LLC
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Richard H.  Marsh,  Senior Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The  Report fully  complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents, in  all
          material  respects, the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                          /s/Richard H. Marsh
                                       ---------------------------
                                             Richard H. Marsh
                                       Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                           November 13, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001003088
<NAME> PHYSIO CONTROL
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (755)
<INVENTORY>                                     38,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,912
<PP&E>                                          21,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,280)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,873
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           173
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,659
<SALES>                                        175,311
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,311
<CGS>                                           88,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,320
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,039
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy A. Richardson, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    NANCY A. RICHARDSON                                                
|Nancy A. Richardson Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary



Date:
July 31, 2003
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of JCP&L Transition Funding LLC
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earl T.
Carey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.





                                              /s/Earl T. Carey
                                     --------------------------------------
                                                 Earl T. Carey
                                                   President
                                           (Chief Executive Officer)
                                               August 13, 2002


                                        11

<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of JCP&L Transition Funding LLC
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
H. Marsh, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.





                                            /s/Richard H. Marsh
                                      ------------------------------------
                                               Richard H. Marsh
                                           Senior Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                               August 13, 2002


                                        12
<PAGE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50127 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

HENRY BARFIELD

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:18

- CR

- 193

- 1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Henry Barfield has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Barfield h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

r elevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 27, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50127 Document: 00515216023 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/27/2019No. 19

- 50127

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further res ponsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-50127 Document: 00515216023 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/27/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      45,556,005              45,556,005
<SECURITIES>                                29,971,456              29,971,456
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,577,686              23,577,686
<ALLOWANCES>                               (3,958,235)             (3,958,235)
<INVENTORY>                                    796,127                 796,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            99,989,043              99,989,043
<PP&E>                                      26,386,435              26,386,435
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,146,551               5,146,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             150,033,167             150,033,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,293,502              19,293,502
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        42,690                  42,690
<OTHER-SE>                                 124,544,278             124,544,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               150,033,167             150,033,167
<SALES>                                     16,541,512              56,259,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,541,512              56,259,446
<CGS>                                        5,027,419              19,394,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,138,852              47,738,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             244,871                 659,078
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,339,908              11,523,350
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,326,304               4,575,805
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,013,604               6,947,545
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,013,604               6,947,545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24                    0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23                    0.87
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

SCOTT GILBERT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Case No. 1:18-cv-22

 Judge Timothy S. Black

 Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 22) AND

TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate 

Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on January 7, 2019, submitted a 

Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 22). No objections were filed.

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo 

all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in 

its entirety and 

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1) The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED, as that decision is supported by 

substantial evidence;
2

2) The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 2/13/19 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-2 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-2 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-2 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-2 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-2 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-2 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 6 of 6