alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON 

JEFFREY W. GROOMS, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-394 

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, District Judge Thomas M. Rose 

 Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman 

 Defendant. 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD 

UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”) (DOC. 10); AND (2) 

AWARDING PLAINTIFF $1,000.00 IN EAJA FEES AND COSTS 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint 

stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees and costs under 

the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $1,000.00. Doc. 

10. Based upon the parties’ stipulation in which they present no dispute that all requirements are 

met for the reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties’ joint 

stipulation (doc. 10); and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees and costs in the amount of 

$1,000.00. As no further matters remain pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED

upon the Court’s docket. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Thomas M. Rose 

Date: 3/21/18 

 Thomas M. Rose 

 United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                ------------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quintek  Technologies,  Inc.
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof,  I, William  Jacobson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 19, 2003

/S/ Robert Steele
-------------------------
    Robert Steele,
    Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           AMC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
             (For the year ended August 31, 1997 and the Period from
                      October 2, 1995 to August 31, 1996)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                 For the
                                                                                               period from
                                                                          For the year         October 2,
                                                                          ended August           1995 to
                                                                            31, 1997           August 31,
                                                                                                  1996
<S>                                                                       <C>                  <C>       
Primary

Weighted average number of outstanding common shares                       61,962,751           61,962,751
                                                                          ===========          ===========

Net Earnings                                                              $ 3,878,623          $ 7,300,598

Primary earnings per common and common equivalent share                   $       .06          $       .12
                                                                          ===========          ===========

Fully Diluted

Weighted average number of outstanding common shares                               (a)          61,962,751
Net effect of dilutive warrants - based on the treasury stock method               (a)          16,736,548
                                                                                               -----------
                                                                                                78,699,299
                                                                                               ===========

Adjusted Net Earnings                                                              (a)         $ 8,062,598

Fully diluted earnings per common and common equivalent share             $       .06          $       .10
                                                                          ===========          ===========
</TABLE>


(a)  Not applicable as warrants are anti-dilutive.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on November 11, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the PDF Association, Inc. (PDFa) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

The name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: PDF Association, Inc., 10 Longfellow Road, Winchester, MA. The nature and scope of the PDF Association's standards development activities are: The standardization of terminology, definitions, formats, and procedures for the production and use of PDF documents, metadata associated with the PDF documents, storage and retrieval of information. Standards, recommended practices, technical reports, white papers, and application notes prepared in accordance with the PDF Association's policies and procedures are intended to have broad acceptance as well as provide the basis upon which to achieve international accord in the development of industry standards. The PDF Association will also coordinate its work with that of other existing ANSI accredited organizations and committees working in related areas.

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 2022-00578 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```

Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the amended Quarterly report of HydroFlo, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis Mast, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Dennis Mast
    Dennis Mast
CEO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
     Accounting Officer

     February 13, 2004
```
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION

LOGAN M. FEATHER 

Plaintiff, 

v. Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-977 

Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura 

FRALEY & SCHILLING, INC., 

Defendant. 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

On this day came Plaintiffs, Logan M. Feather, by and through counsel, Erika Klie 

Kolenich, Esq. of Klie Law Offices, PLLC, and respectfully moved this Honorable Court to 

dismiss, without prejudice, Plaintiffs’ claims Defendant, Fraley & Schilling, Inc. 

After consideration of the Motion filed (ECF No. 20), the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’

Motion 

and hereby ORDERS that Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant, Fraley & Schilling, Inc., are 

dismissed, without prejudice. 

The Court further ORDERS that this action be removed from the Court’s active docket.

Entered this 27th day of February 2019. 

Chelsey M. Vascura 

CHELSEY M. VASCURA 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
2 

Prepared by: 

/s/Erika Klie Kolenich 

Erika Klie Kolenich (0078420) 

Klie Law Offices, PLLC. 

85 W. Main Street 

Buckhannon, WV 26201 

(304) 472-5007 

Facsimile: (304) 472-1126 

ehklie@klielawoffices.com
UCC FINANCING STATEMENT

FOLiWWSTRUCTWS CT Ll«n SoSutiOM

RepnsMntation of filing

A NAME & fSMONE OF CONIACT AT Filf« |»pt:CR9l)

Pfion# Fs*

Th» f#h»f !•

8 E-UAll CmrACy AT FitER iagjtoflalj Fite Nwnl>»r: OHOO’flWSWW

Fite Oat® :04.0ee.20lS

C SENS ACWOWtEOQMENT TO {Nam* ana AsSf***)

51513949

OHOH

330 N Bfafid BW, Suit# 7§0

Atm: SPRS 

GtencJafe. CA 91203

OH Tm A80Vt SPACE ® FCWt riLJ>« OFFJCl OS* ONLY

t DEBTOf^'S NAME Dat^ r>mm (td m NS fmm': mfm&mL moe^, sr a^rev^ »r^

?»ame r^l an Nr«# Its kmm ^^ 1 timk, d^-cfc bans im 0»»lAspf Wi tO ^^fw^rntm^g ^

:ORG^SATion‘S HAii^

CENTRAL USA WIRELESS. LlC

F!RiT isf NAkS mjf-nx

H: Cttf S^TAt CCC^ COUN?ll¥

11|i 0 MONtOONIEHY m CEMTEHVftlE OH 45429 USA

2 DEBTORS NAI^, -gr^y mfm Hm & ium mMS, NIi m^. m mi ^nodafv gy

rimm. *M fm

mv p^< si iS ffic- S)«^s»'s

m Ih. ai ai &mA mm O t^m D@G5^ 10 Fmarcsf^ SSi!n.^nTani Iftm^ UCC

0^ my¥mmL% wmiMm A^T€mAL

CITV ■fTATg

3. SECURED PARTY'S NAME is? name ^ ^ $icu^«.0 pmr^i i^«de ^ iwm(u m 3b|

C T Co^rpcr#tion Sysitm. as wpmmnMim

OR T#€^.SONfti, Hfm. A430ITtGNM. mn A

I. €«y it*m cmt CCHiHW'-

330 N Bwntf 8tel, itte rm Am. SPSS Gtendate CA 81203 USA

a COLLATER^ife fbas cgYiBiff Iss^sainf

lh@ . p#rion«l ix^rly am ofher ■»«!« {»ftee1iv»ty, 'Pntpmiiy"). fif»rsc«<1 esrv«f«<i tty m cJ«»enb#0 m lh« , etjuipmen!

fcanc« *grwim«M Of «»taimtnl jjaynteftl »9f##!n#nl a#«it9f»5»d a* Agrswenf No. 21S77&4 and »i »@t forth m Sch«dole A to Afr««rt»f»t Ho 2167754

to^Sw with *tl r»pt#»»ter.ts tor, 3<Jilii»prts »,

wrthoot iiTMt»ten, p#oe*»i1» of msawnot S*ewf«d p#%(’tes»o*' and 8^or/te**»*

»i« a«»sa!ors# to toe Property #(to «« ptot»o4$ Of any of to# lm«gmng. imatidifsg.

toat m*l ■ nw# Oatatms stescfipmn of th# Property being

P*rtyil6s»ssf amofig its books and wttords in wtmuvm m»» detotef deserfotei of lh« Pr!*p«% thanced«»

fecsivad ttmt Om- «ippl«f of su^ Property and, ate«it rt»«f«st effor, »o#! *wted oescftptioft

fciancM »h«i b© w^taiftod by

S dhttgj. 01.1. if aissik.t#l# erit. an# ^

$» It a^ptstmrn mm chtnai Otm:M 2£fe 4 sppweN* »# »«* on* Bat

Lk#m#«iU3ayw

S4a.wfscfeff«4-F)©rT^ TTa^ysssilOn

?. AtTEUmTIVE m$mmnm 0 |^ Immm^mrn rn$#^M&yyiN’ o

i. 0RtK>NAi ntm RErgRtNCe mtA:

SlSl3f4t

^ ct F G mum cc»»Y — UCC financing statei^nt < rnmms. CA fw

EXHIBIT

B

I

Case: 1:17-cv-00744-SKB Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Case No. 1:17-cv-630
Plaintiff, Dlott, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.
vs.

DARRELL L. STAPLETON, et al., ORDER
Defendants.

This matter is before the Court following an informal discovery conference held on April
18, 2018 in which the parties discussed defendants’ proposed draft protective order. The issues
raised by the parties are resolved as follows:
1. The parties shall propound their discovery requests and discuss the documents and
other information viewed as confidential.
2. The parties shall request another informal discovery conference with the Court to the
extent any outstanding discovery disputes remain.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: Y/ 198

Karen L. Fan,
United States Magistrate Judge
II 

Calendar No. 720 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4445 

[Report No. 111–379] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

DECEMBER 20, 2010 

Reported by Mr. DORGAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 95–232 to repeal a restriction on 

treating as Indian country certain lands held in trust 

for Indian pueblos in New Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian Pueblo Cultural 

5 Center Clarification Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4445 RS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION ON TREATING AS INDIAN 

2 COUNTRY CERTAIN LANDS HELD IN TRUST 

3 FOR INDIAN PUEBLOS IN NEW MEXICO. 

4 Public Law 95–232 is amended in the first section 

5 in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘However, such property 

6 shall not be ‘Indian country’ as defined in section 1151 

7 of title 18, United States Code.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON GAMING. 

9 Public Law 95–232 is amended in the first section 

10 by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(e) PROHIBITION ON GAMING.—Gaming, as defined 

12 and regulated by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 

13 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), shall be prohibited on land held in 

14 trust pursuant to subsection (b).’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 720 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4445 

[Report No. 111–379] 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 95–232 to repeal a restricheld in trust for Indian pueblos in New Mexico. tion on treating as Indian country certain lands 

DECEMBER 20, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 3, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel R. DeFazio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DANIEL R.
DEFAZIODaniel R. DeFazioChief Financial OfficerOctober 17, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Justin M. Chapman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JUSTIN M. CHAPMAN                                                                 
|Justin M. Chapman                                                                     
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)

Date: October 28, 2010
#### People v Turner,

No. 90860;

Court of Appeals No. 111515. Reconsideration denied October 28,1991.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of OSK Capital III Corp(the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB  for  the  period  ending March 31, 2004 (the  "Report"),
I,  Frank L. Kramer, Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/
-----------------------
Frank L. Kramer
Treasurer, Secretary, Director and
Chief Financial Officer
May 17, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1622
ESTILE L. MARTIN, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; BEATRICE POCAHONTAS COAL COMPANY; OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of An Order of the Benefits Review Board. (95-1743-BLA) Submitted: February 28, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Estile L. Martin, Petitioner Pro Se. Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Sannie Louise Overly, JACKSON & KELLY, Lexington, Kentucky, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order and order on reconsideration affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A.§§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidenceand is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Martin v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs , No. 95-1743-BLA (B.R.B. Jan. 18, 1996 & Apr. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7256

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES J. MOORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CR-92-742, CA-92-325-A)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles J. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Moore, Nos. CR-92-742; CA-92-325-A

(E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Shahbazian, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL
SHAHBAZIAN                                                              
|Michael Shahbazian Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer Date: May 23, 2007