alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

ANGELA K. WARE, 

 

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:17-cv-1015

 JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

The Plaintiff, Angela K. Ware, timely objected to the Report and Recommendation issued 

by the Magistrate Judge, who recommended that the denial of disability benefits be affirmed. For 

the reasons that follow, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation that the benefits be 

DENIED and the objections are OVERRULED.

The Court has carefully reviewed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge and 

subsequent Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court has also carefully 

reviewed the objections raised by Ms. Ware. She contends that the Magistrate Judge improperly 

evaluated the opinions rendered by Dr. Spindler.1

The plaintiff claims that the Magistrate Judge improperly characterized Dr. Spindler’s 

opinions as vague, when in fact they were not. Dr. Spindler made the following observations:

[Ware] seems capable of managing a variety of unskilled, labor-type jobs. [Ware] 

appears to have the mental ability to maintain a level of attention and concentration 

that would be sufficient for most job settings. However, it seems unlikely that she 

would handle the added stress of outside employment. 

(R. at 755.)

1 As the Magistrate Judge noted, Spindler holds a M.S. degree and is licensed as a psychologist. It is unclear 

whether he is a doctor of psychology. Nonetheless, since the matter has not been at issue, the Court will treat his 

report as rendered by Dr. Spindler. 

Case: 2:17-cv-01015-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 04/30/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1583
2

Dr. Spindler assigned a GAF score of 61, which is defined as indicative of only mild symptoms 

involving difficulty in social, occupational or school functioning.2

The opinion of Dr. Spindler was at best ambiguous, and only mixed support of the 

plaintiff’s claim. Moreover, Dr. Spindler was an examining, but not treating physician. Drs. 

Rivera and Zwissler came to more certain, contrary conclusions, which both the Magistrate Judge 

and Administrative Law Judge indicated. The contrary positions taken by Drs. Rivera and 

Zwissler were reasoned and documented thereby constituting substantial evidence to support the 

Commissioner’s decision.

In light of this, the Magistrate Judge did not err in concluding that Dr. Spindler’s opinion 

was vague and was properly discredited. 

For those reasons, the objections are OVERRULED. (ECF No. 16.) The Court ADOPTS

the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 15.) The decision of the 

Commissioner denying benefits is AFFIRMED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4/30/2020 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2 A GAF score of 41-50 indicates serious symptoms and impairment. A score of 51-60 indicates moderate 

symptoms. A 61 to 70 score indicates mild symptoms. 

Case: 2:17-cv-01015-EAS-EPD Doc #: 18 Filed: 04/30/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1584
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7425
RAYMOND EUGENE LEACH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSEPH L. VALLIERE, Correctional Officer, Piedmont Correctional Institution; BRIANSTOCKTON, Correctional Officer, Piedmont Correctional Institution; JACKIE T. NULL, Unit Nurse, Piedmont Correctional Institution; RONALD E. JONES, Superintendent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-772-4) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Eugene Leach, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Clark Dalton, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Leach v. Valliere , No. CA96-772-4 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.3





Exhibit 10.3




Summary of Compensation Structure for Non-Associate Members of

Board of Directors of Abercrombie & Fitch Co., effective as of February 23, 2010




Officers of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (the “Company”) who are also directors of the Company
receive no additional compensation for services rendered as directors. Directors of the Company
who are not employees, or as referred to by the Company, “associates”, of the Company or its
subsidiaries (“non-associate directors”) receive:




	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $55,000 (paid quarterly in arrears);






	 	•	 	an annual retainer for each standing committee Chair and member of $25,000 and
$12,500, respectively, other than (i) the Chair and members of the Audit Committee who
receive $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, and (ii) the Lead Independent Director of
the Company who receives $35,000 for serving in that capacity. In each case, the
retainers are paid quarterly in arrears; and






	 	•	 	an annual grant of 3,000 restricted stock units (each of which represents the
right to receive one share of Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, of the Company
(the “Common Stock”), upon vesting).






The annual restricted stock unit grant is subject to the following provisions:




	 	•	 	restricted stock units will be granted annually on the date of the annual
meeting of stockholders of the Company;






	 	•	 	the maximum market value of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the date
of grant will be $300,000 (i.e., should the price of the Company’s Common Stock on the
grant date exceed $100 per share, the number of restricted stock units granted will be
automatically reduced to provide a maximum grant date market value of $300,000);






	 	•	 	the minimum market value of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the date
of grant will be $120,000 (i.e., should the price of the Company’s Common Stock on the
grant date be lower than $40 per share, the number of restricted stock units granted
will be automatically increased to provide a minimum grant date market value of
$120,000); and






	 	•	 	restricted stock units will vest on the later of (i) the first anniversary of
the grant date or (ii) the first “open window” trading date following the first
anniversary of the grant date, subject to earlier vesting in the event of the
director’s death or total disability or upon a change of control of the Company.





Non-associate directors are also reimbursed for their expenses for attending meetings of the
Company’s Board of Directors and Board committee meetings and receive the discount on purchases of
the Company’s merchandise extended to all Company associates.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2240-2241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Notice of Availability; Data Collection Effort for E.O. 13985--
Increasing Equity in Procurement Spending Barrier Assessment

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of a voluntary survey 
relating to potential barriers that underserved communities and 
individuals may face in taking advantage of agency procurement and 
contracting opportunities.

ADDRESSES: The survey is available at https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/6659553/OSBDU-Data-Collection-Effort-for-E.O.-13985.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Jenkins, Office of Small and 
Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU), Department of the Treasury, 
by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#511c343d382222307f1b343f3a383f221105233430222423287f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="216c444d485252400f6b444f4a484f526175534440525453580f464e57">[email protected]</span></a> or by telephone: 202-622-8213.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Treasury remains 
committed to ensuring maximum inclusion in the Department's federal 
procurement opportunities. In accordance with Executive Order 13985 of 
January 20, 2021 Section 5(b) ``Potential barriers that underserved 
communities and individuals may face in taking advantage of agency 
procurement and contracting opportunities,'' the U.S. Department of the 
Treasury, is inviting industry resource partners to provide input on 
what they observe to be barriers based on their experience for small 
disadvantaged businesses, service-disabled veteran owned small 
businesses, contractors in HUBZones, minority-owned businesses, and 
women-owned businesses through Departmental procurement opportunities. 
The link to the survey is found in the ADDRESSES section of this 
notice.
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (5 U.S.C. 
3501 et seq.), the survey has been reviewed and approved by the Office 
of Management and Budget and assigned control number 1505-0231. An 
agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to 
respond to a collection of

[[Page 2241]]

information unless it displays a valid control number.

Melissa M. Jenkins,
U.S. Department of the Treasury, WOSB Program Manager/In-Reach & 
Outreach/Underserved Communities, Office of Small & Disadvantaged 
Business Utilization (OSDBU).
[FR Doc. 2022-00473 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Investment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 

INVESTMENT AGREEMENT 

This investment agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into on May 21, 2010, between Harrison Steans
(“Steans”) and Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”). 
 The Company has commenced a
private placement that includes the placement of up to 1,500,000 shares of 8.0% Non-Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (the “Series C Preferred”). Prairie Capital IV, L.P. and Prairie Capital IV QP, L.P.
(collectively, the “Prairie Capital Funds”) have agreed to acquire shares of Series C Preferred in this private placement as more fully set forth on the signature page to that certain securities purchase agreement, dated as of
May 21, 2010, by among the Company and the investors set forth therein (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”). All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the
Securities Purchase Agreement. The ability of the Prairie Capital Funds to acquire all of such shares of Series C Preferred may be limited or constrained by the rules of the Federal Reserve. 

In light of the possibility that the Prairie Capital Funds might be precluded from purchasing shares of Series C Preferred by the rules
of the Federal Reserve, Steans hereby agrees to increase his investment in the Series C Preferred by an amount equal to the amount that the Prairie Capital Funds agreed to invest in shares of the Series C Preferred, minus the amount that the Prairie
Capital Funds are permitted to invest in shares of the Series C Preferred without requiring further approval or consent of the Federal Reserve. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of Harrison Steans and the Company has caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first
written above. 
  

			
	 /S/ HARRISON I. STEANS

	Harrison I. Steans
	
	COMPANY:
	
	TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /S/ MARK A. HOPPE

		 	Name: Mark A. Hoppe
		 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JAMES RAY JOHNSON, )
) CASE NO. 3:18CV00020
Plaintiff, )
) | JUDGE RICE
v. ) | MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVINGTON
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, )
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF )
SOCIAL SECURITY, )
)
Defendant. )

ORDER

The Court grants the parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney’s Fees Under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and awards Plaintiff attorney fees in the
amount of FOUR THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($4,600.00) in full satisfaction of any claims
for fees, expenses, and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 that may be payable in this case.

Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff and can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that
Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). After the
Court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that Plaintiff owes no pre-existing
debts to the United States that are subject to offset, Defendant will direct that the award be made

payable to Plaintiffs attorney pursuant to the attorney’s fee assignment duly signed by Plaintiff.

Lire Mee.

Date: J 79 Y- iv Entered:
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-4 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-4 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-4 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:01-cv-00067-HJW Document 89-4 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 4 of 4
# Amtsblatt C 250/2019

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 250 |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 62. Jahrgang25. Juli 2019 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 250

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

62. Jahrgang25. Juli 2019

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informationen |
| | INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION |
| | Europäisches ParlamentRat |
| 2019/C 250/01 | Gemeinsame Erklärung des Europäischen Parlaments, des Rates und der Kommission zur Verordnung (EU) 2019/1243 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. Juni 2019 zur Anpassung von Rechtsakten, in denen auf das Regelungsverfahren mit Kontrolle Bezug genommen wird, an Artikel 290 und 291 des Vertrags über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

IV   Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Europäisches ParlamentRat

2019/C 250/01

Gemeinsame Erklärung des Europäischen Parlaments, des Rates und der Kommission zur Verordnung (EU) 2019/1243 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. Juni 2019 zur Anpassung von Rechtsakten, in denen auf das Regelungsverfahren mit Kontrolle Bezug genommen wird, an Artikel 290 und 291 des Vertrags über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

IV Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Europäisches Parlament Rat

| 25.7.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 250/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 250/1

---

Gemeinsame Erklärung des Europäischen Parlaments, des Rates und der Kommission zur Verordnung (EU) 2019/1243 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. Juni 2019 zur Anpassung von Rechtsakten, in denen auf das Regelungsverfahren mit Kontrolle Bezug genommen wird, an Artikel 290 und 291 des Vertrags über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union (1)

(2019/C 250/01)

Unter Nummer 27 der Interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung über bessere Rechtsetzung erkennen die drei Organe die Notwendigkeit an, dass alle bestehenden Rechtsvorschriften an den mit dem Vertrag von Lissabon eingeführten Rechtsrahmen angepasst werden müssen, und insbesondere die Notwendigkeit, dass der umgehenden Anpassung aller Basisrechtsakte, in denen noch immer auf das Regelungsverfahren mit Kontrolle Bezug genommen wird, hohe Priorität eingeräumt werden muss. Nach dem diesbezüglichen Vorschlag der Kommission entspricht die Verordnung dieser Notwendigkeit, da für zahlreiche Rechtsakte, die in diesem Vorschlag enthalten sind, die Anpassung betreffend das Regelungsverfahren mit Kontrolle vorgesehen ist. Die drei Organe werden weiterhin an der Anpassung der verbleibenden Rechtsakte dieses Vorschlags arbeiten.

---

(1)  ABl. L 198 vom 25.7.2019, S. 241.

---
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and will be
retained by Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 13, 2005           /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                             -------------------------------------------
                             Eduardo Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James A. Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/ JAMES A. FONTAINE                                              
|                       |  | James A. Fontaine                                                  
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
|                      
|Date: October 23, 2008
exv10w2









Exhibit 10.2




2010 Incentive Compensation Program

Amir Bassan-Eskenazi, President and Chief Executive Officer




	 	 	 	 	 

	Base Salary (annual):
	 	$	412,000	 
	Bonus Potential at 100% funding
	 	 	 	 
	First Half (based on annual base salary of $325,000):
	 	 	162,500	 
	Second Half:
	 	 	206,000	 
	 
	 	 	 
	Total:
	 	$	368,500	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Second Half	 
	 	 	% Goal	 
	2010 Officer Bonus Goal	 	Weighting	 
	1) Achieve specified customer goal
	 	 	10	%
	2) Achieve IP product goal
	 	 	20	%
	3) Achieve strategy goal
	 	 	20	%
	4) Achieve MSP product goal
	 	 	15	%
	5) Achieve business plan goal
	 	 	10	%
	6) Achieve channel sales goal
	 	 	10	%
	7) Achieve teamwork goal
	 	 	10	%
	8) Achieve employee satisfaction and retention goal
	 	 	5	%
	 
	 	 	 
	Total
	 	 	100	%






2010 Incentive Compensation Program

Ravi Narula, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




	 	 	 	 	 

	Base Salary (annual):
	 	$	253,100	 
	Bonus Potential at 100% funding
	 	 	 	 
	First Half:
	 	NA
	Second Half:
	 	 	75,930	 
	 
	 	 	 
	Total:
	 	$	75,930	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Second Half	 
	 	 	% Goal	 
	2010 Officer Bonus Goal	 	Weighting	 
	1) Achieve operating results goals
	 	 	40	%
	2) Achieve corporate development goal
	 	 	10	%
	3) Achieve audit and financial controls goals
	 	 	30	%
	4) Achieve processes improvements goal
	 	 	5	%
	5) Achieve employee development goal
	 	 	10	%
	6) Achieve employee satisfaction and retention goal
	 	 	5	%
	 
	 	 	 
	Total
	 	 	100	%






 









 






2010 Incentive Compensation Program

Rob Horton, Senior Vice President and General Counsel




	 	 	 	 	 

	Base Salary (annual):
	 	$	250,000	 
	Bonus Potential:
	 	 	 	 
	First Half:
	 	 	75,000	 
	Second Half:
	 	 	75,000	 
	 
	 	 	 
	Total:
	 	$	150,000	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Second Half	 
	 	 	% Goal	 
	2010 Officer Bonus Goal	 	Weighting	 
	1) Achieve regulatory goal
	 	 	20	%
	2) Achieve corporate governance and securities compliance goals
	 	 	35	%
	3) Achieve internal customer satisfaction goal
	 	 	25	%
	4) Achieve specified litigation management goal
	 	 	5	%
	5) Achieve site leadership goal
	 	 	5	%
	6) Achieve teamwork goal
	 	 	10	%
	 
	 	 	 
	Total
	 	 	100	%






2010 Incentive Compensation Program

Ran Oz, Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer




	 	 	 	 	 

	Base Salary (annual):
	 	$	225,000	 
	Bonus Potential at 100% funding
	 	 	 	 
	First Half:
	 	 	67,500	 
	Second Half:
	 	 	67,500	 
	 
	 	 	 
	Total:
	 	$	135,000	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Second Half	 
	 	 	% Goal	 
	2010 Officer Bonus Goal	 	Weighting	 
	1) Achieve specified technology demonstration goals
	 	 	40	%
	2) Achieve innovation process goal
	 	 	15	%
	3) Achieve specified IP product goal
	 	 	15	%
	4) Achieve specified strategic channel partner goal
	 	 	10	%
	5) Achieve new applications goal
	 	 	10	%
	6) Achieve teamwork goal
	 	 	10	%
	 
	 	 	 
	Total
	 	 	100	%
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0202 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SEIDEL PINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 30, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 21 2022

04/21/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0202