alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, David W. Honeyfield, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ultra Petroleum Corp.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

|                                              |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ David W. Honeyfield                           |
| David W. Honeyfield,                              |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                     |

Date: June 4, 2020
3. If you found in favor of Mrs. Abbott on either of her claims, what damages, if any, do
you find Mrs. Abbott is entitled to?

SIO OCD Cee
T

(All must agree)


3. If you found in favor of Mr. Abbott on either of his claims, what damages, if any, do
you find Mr. Abbott is entitled to?

$_4o 00 cers

(All must agree)


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

TRAVIS AND JULIE ABBOTT,
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-998
Plaintiffs,
JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS
AND COMPANY,

Defendant.

JURY VERDICT FORM

1. Do you find in favor of Mr. Abbott on his claim related to his 1994 cancer?

Yes:_\/
No:
(All must agree)

2. Do you find in favor of Mr. Abbott on his claih? related to his 2015 cancer?

Yes:_s/

No:

(All must agree)

If your answer to Question | and/or 2 is “Yes,” then answer the following question.
If your answer to Question 1 and 2 is “No,” do not answer the following question.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

TRAVIS AND JULIE ABBOTT,
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-998
Plaintiffs,
JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS
AND COMPANY,

Defendant.

JURY VERDICT FORM FOR LOSS OF CONSORTIUM CLAIM

1. If you found in favor of Mr. Abbott on his claim related to his 1994 cancer, do you
find in favor of Mrs. Abbott on her loss of consortium claim?

Yes:
No:

(All must agree)

2. If you found in favor of Mr. Abbott on his claim related to his 2015 cancer, do you
find in favor of Mrs. Abbott on her loss of consortium claim?

Yes:
No:
(Adl must agree)

If your answer to Question 1 and/or 2 is “Yes,” then answer the following question.
If your answer to Question 1 and 2 is “No,” do not answer the following question.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

TRAVIS AND JULIE ABBOTT,
CASE NO. 2:18-cy-136
Plaintiffs,
JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS
AND COMPANY,

Defendant.

JURY INTERROGATORY

Answer this interrogatory only if you found in favor of Mr. Abbott on his claim and
awarded him compensatory damages.

Do you find that Mr. Abbott or Mrs. Abbott has proven by clear and convincing
evidence that DuPont acted with actual malice and that Mr. Abbott or Mrs. Abbott has
presented proof of actual damages that resulted from those acts or failures to act of DuPont?
(“Actual malice” means a conscious disregard for the rights and safety of other persons that has
a great probability of causing substantial harm.)

Yes:

No: 7

(All must agree)
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Marcus Faust, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Metropolitan Financial Corp. (the "Company") certifies in his capacity as an
officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Company's annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and that to his knowledge:

         (1)      the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: March 25, 2003                           /s/Marcus Faust
                                               -----------------------------
                                               Marcus Faust,
                                               Executive Vice President
                                               and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         4416862
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        10398316
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   61467982
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        28072373
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          27853038
<LOANS>                                      399078123
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3406150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               515341339
<DEPOSITS>                                   424811286
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           12021039
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       6650340
<OTHER-SE>                                    71858674
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               515341339
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               33812005
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4898634
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              38710639
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            20832300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            20832300
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         17878339
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   200400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              268915
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                7460889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               11800113
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     7803420
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7803420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.05
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     38918
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3236150
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3406150
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            839750
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        2566400
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EIGHT (8) COUNTERFEIT 

WATCHES, et al., 

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-156

District Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIM

This case is before the Court on the Government’s motion to dismiss the Claim of 

Decedent Claimant, Abdullah Luqman, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a). (Doc. 38). 

On April 19, 2017, the Government filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in 

rem against Eight (8) Counterfeit Watches, and Assorted Counterfeit Clothing, Shoes, 

and Accessories (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 1). On March 31, 2017, Decedent 

Claimant Abdullah Luqman filed a Claim to Defendants. (Doc. 3).

On November 30, 2023, counsel for Decedent Claimant filed a Statement of 

Death, noting that Ms. Dorothy Gilbert, a non-party, is Decedent Claimant’s mother and

the only possible successor or likely personal representative of Decedent Claimant known 

to counsel. (Doc. 32). Counsel advised Ms. Gilbert of the instant action but noted that he 

was not retained to represent any successor, or personal representative for the Estate of 

Abdullah Luqman. (Id.) On February 15, 2024, Ms. Gilbert was served with a copy of 

the of the Statement of Death. (Doc. 37). On August 14, 2024, the Government filed the 

Case: 1:17-cv-00156-TSB-SKB Doc #: 39 Filed: 08/28/24 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 178
2

instant motion to dismiss the Claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a), noting that more 

than ninety (90) days has elapsed from the date of service and no motion for substitution 

has been filed. (Doc. 38).

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a), if a claim is not extinguished following the death 

of a party, “[a] motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent’s 

successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a 

statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.” 

Here, Ms. Gilbert, who is Decedent Claimant’s only known possible successor or 

representative, was served with the Statement of Death on February 15, 2024. (Doc. 37). 

More than ninety (90) days have now passed and, to date, no claim has been filed and no 

motion has been made for substitution of the proper party. 

Based upon the foregoing, the Government’s Rule 25(a) motion to dismiss the 

Claim is GRANTED. (Doc. 38). Accordingly, the Claim of Decedent Claimant 

Abdullah Luqman (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 8/28/2024 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

Case: 1:17-cv-00156-TSB-SKB Doc #: 39 Filed: 08/28/24 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 179
TradeOn Inc.: Exhibit 10.9 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com











Exhibit 10.9 


Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount 


Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the "Contract") Entered into by and between Changzhou Wujin Best Cable Co., Ltd. (the "Guarantor") and Jiangsu Wujin Rural Commercial Bank (the
"Creditor") on May 22, 2009


Main contents:

	
Guaranty Contract number: 3218862009920007;

	
Guarantor undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for Changzhou Kaikai Lighting Appliance Co., Ltd. (the "Obligor")’s indebtedness towards the Creditor under Loan Contract of Maximum Amount (Credit) between the Obligor and
Creditor(Contract reference no. 3218862009120005) from May 22, 2009, to May 21, 2010, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 3.5 million.

	

Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt.

	

Scope of Guaranty: The guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract compensation, damages, loss of foreign exchange rate floating, and fees incurred to the Creditor to realizing its rights
including but not limited to litigation fee, legal fee, etc..

	

Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of relevant agreements or documents entered into between the Obligor and Creditor.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 122 (Wednesday, June 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 35995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14836]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Notice of July 9 Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid 
Meeting

AGENCY: United States Agency for International Development.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary 
Foreign Aid (ACVFA).
    Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2014.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Location: Horizon Room, Ronald Reagan Building.

Purpose

    The Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA) brings 
together USAID and private voluntary organizations (PVO) officials, 
representatives from universities, international nongovernment 
organizations (NGOs), U.S. businesses, and government, multilateral, 
and private organizations to foster understanding, communication, and 
cooperation in the area of foreign aid.

Agenda

    USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah will make opening remarks, followed 
by panel discussions among ACVFA members and USAID leadership on the 
Global Development Lab. The full meeting agenda will be forthcoming on 
the ACVFA Web site at http://www.usaid.gov/who-we-are/organization/advisory-committee.

Stakeholders

    The meeting is free and open to the public. Persons wishing to 
attend should register online at http://ow.ly/wlC6G.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayne Thomisee, 202-712-5506.

    Dated: June 18, 2014.
Jayne Thomisee,
Executive Director & Policy Advisor, U.S. Agency for International 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2014-14836 Filed 6-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 134664 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### COMPLETE AUTO & TRUCK PARTS, INC., Stephen J. Markman, 

### Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices



### v SC: 134664 COA: 268485 Genesee CC: 04-080445-CK CITY OF FLINT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32





Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  February
      26, 2010
                                          /s/
      David L. Thomas
                                          
                                          Name:  David
      L. ThomasTitle:
      Chief Operating OfficerDated:  February
      26, 2010
                                          /s/
      Michael J. Celebrezze
                                          
                                          Name:  Michael
      J. CelebrezzeTitle:
      Senior Vice President of Finance,Chief
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer
## COUNTY OF ALBANY 525 GRAND AVE ROOM f 05 · LARAMIE, WYOMING 82070 {307) 721**~2541** • FAX (307) 72f**~.2544**

COMMISSIONERS@CO,AL.SANY.WY.US

July 3, 2012

Michael Martin TransportationIndustry Analyst Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20590
RE: USDOT Essential Air Service Bids for Laramie, Wyoming
DearMr. 

### Martin: 0

CJ. 

### cr

We support the application ofSkyWest**Airline~;** to provide Essential Air Service to the Laramie Regional Airport. The service currently provided is inadequate and renewal ofthe EAS contract with Great Lakes Airlines would be a disservice 

### to the air travelers in Albany County who need 

### to make 

### connections with flights out ofDenver International Airpot·t.
The continuing leakage ofairtravelers fium our local airport. as documented by studiesdone by the State ofWyoming, has caused a loss offunding opportunities for aiq>ol1 development, inconvenience and additional cost for those who are rtow driving the dista11ce to Denver Jnternational Airport to commence their travels. It is ourbeliefthese numbers can only be turned around by a new air service provider.
The economic development ofAlbany County is directly linked to ourability to compete in a global market) the ability to rely on travel plans originating at our local airport is essential to our effi.H1s in this area. We again urge that you select SkyWest Airlines a5 the new provider of Essential Air Service to the Laramie Regional Airport. · Sincerety,

# ~8~ Tim Sullivan, Chairman Albany County Board ofCommissioners

cc: Laramie Regional Airport Board

TIM CHESNUT COMMISSIONER TIM SULLIVAN COMMISSIONER CHAIRMAN JERRY 

### M. KENNEDY COMMISSIONER

# --------------~**~~-**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-478-000.                

*Applicants:*                     Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.                          ( print page 2427)    

*Description:*                     § 4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Pal Agreement—Koch January 2022 to be effective 1/8/2022.                

*Filed Date:*                     1/7/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220107-5174.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 pm ET 1/19/22.                

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the links or querying the docket number.

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: January 10, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-00683 Filed 1-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Te xas

May 21, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00236

- CV

IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF CHARLES INNESS THRASH, AN ADULT,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PC2912

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The A pp ellees ’ Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED.

Time is extended to July 29, 2019.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EX-10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 
  





 
 March 6, 2015 

To: Roger Lewis 
 From: Stephanie Pugliese 

cc: Steve Schlecht 
 RE: Agreement for consulting services
for March, 2015 – February, 2016 
 Dear Roger: 

As a follow up to our phone conversation on February 23, 2015 I am sending you this proposal of services for the coming year. 

We have agreed to a one-time payment of $60,000.00 to be paid to you on March 6, 2015. This amount reflects acknowledgement of work done in 2014 and your
contributions to the successful year we had. In addition, we agree to a fee of $5,000.00 to be billed monthly for consulting services in the following areas: 
  

	 	1.	Continued regular consultations with our VP of Marketing, Suz Harms as you have been for the past several years 

  

	 	2.	Involvement in planning of marketing strategy, including media spend, direct interaction with our media planner and advertising agency partners and analysis of market opportunities 


 

	 	3.	Guidance in several strategic planning discussions for the total business, with dates to be determined throughout the year. These discussions will include input from several areas of the business outside of marketing,
including merchandising and product development 

  

	 	4.	Participation in the opportunity assessment and budgeting for 2016 and involvement in discussions around a 3-5 year plan for growth 


Roger, I value your partnership and know that you will continue to counsel our internal team with great diligence and attention to the opportunities that this
Brand has ahead of us. I look forward to working with you closely this year. 
 Please sign and date on the line below and return this to me. 

Sincerely, 
  

					
	Stephanie Pugliese	 		 	/s/ Roger Lewis
	President and CEO	 		 	Roger Lewis
	Duluth Trading Company