alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# MDS Energy Ltd.

409 Butler Road Suite A

Kittanning PA, 16201



### EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Information Request : C. Edward Dunmire 2

- 331M

To whom it may concern,

Enclosed is the information requested by the EPA concerning hydraulic fracturing for the C.
Edward Dunmire 1

- 331M well that had previously been unidentified. The information regarding this well is set up in the similar manner as the previously submitted data. Each topic of interest has its own folder, within that folder are folders re garding each question under that topic.

MDS Energy requests that all of the enclosed data remain confidential.

If you have any questions regarding the submitted information please contact MDS Energy Ltd

.

Phone: 724

- 548

- 2501
Fax: 724

- 548

- 2330

# MDS Energy Ltd.

409 Butler Road Suite A

Kittanning PA, 16201



## EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Information Request

To whom it may concern,

Enclosed is the information requested by the EPA concerning hydraulic fracturing. The information is arranged as follows: Inside the folder titled "Requested Wells" are the folders of all available wells for which information was requested. Within each well folder are additional folders title d by the requested topics, Geological Maps and Cross Sections; Drilling and Completion Information; Water Quality, Volume, and Disposition; Hydraulic Fracturing; and Environmental Releases. Within the folders of the requested topics are folders titled by n umber for each specific request made under that topic. Each numbered folder contains the relevant information to that specific request for that particular well.

All available information concerning the requested topics has been provided to the best of ou r knowledge. Any requested information that is found absent in the appropriate folders was not acquired, available, or the requested information was not applicable to that particular well . The following two wells under the EPA title of "Well Identifier" we re not found under MSD Energy
records: 22

- 026568, 22

- 026802, it is unclear as to what these numbers pertain to. In addition to these two wells, the Gilbert C Querio #1

- 43 well was a platted well that was never drilled, therefore there is no applicable info rmation concerning this well.

MDS Energy requests that all of the enclosed data remain confidential.

If you have any questions regarding the submitted information please contact MDS Energy Ltd

.

Phone: 724

- 548

- 2501
Fax: 724

- 548

- 2330
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LARRY D. MARVEL,

Defendant-Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff-Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§

§ No. 295, 2014

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ Cr. ID 0510007925

§

§

Submitted: June 5, 2014

 Decided: June 26, 2014

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and RIDGELY, Justices.

O R D E R

This 26th day of June 2014, after careful consideration of the opening brief 

and the State’s motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the judgment below 

should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision 

dated May 5, 2014. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant’s 

fourth motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant 

had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. 

Chief Justice
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1688

JEMMY FERSN SEKEON; STEVEN HENNRY SEKEON, Petitioners,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-192-592; A97-624-168) Submitted: December 16, 2005 Decided: January 19, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alex Chanthunya, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioners. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The Sekeons do not challenge the Board’s denial of the asylum claim as untimely or the denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Jemmy Fersn Sekeon and Steven Hennry Sekeon, brothers, are natives and citizens of Indonesia. The Sekeons petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s order denying their request for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. *They claim that the Board erred in affirming the immigration judge’s denial of their applications for withholding of removal. “To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic , 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Based on our review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that the Sekeons have failed to meet this standard. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS  60604

September 6, 2012

Before

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 11‐3389

SHAQUILLE GRIFFIN,

             Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

RICHARD BELL,

Defendant‐Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division

No. 09‐cv‐06549

Arlander Keys, Magistrate Judge

O R D E R

The slip opinion issued on September 4, 2012 is amended as follows:

On page 11, line 12, the word ʺwitnessʺ shall be replaced with the word ʺjuror.ʺ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,570
<INVENTORY>                                     51,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,266
<PP&E>                                          42,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 458,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,210
<BONDS>                                        281,094
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   458,763
<SALES>                                        177,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,836
<CGS>                                          118,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (311)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,169
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       500
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit E-5**

| Eidos PLC – Interest        of Director |
|----------------------------------------------|
| Eidos PLC                                    |
| 23 September 2002                            |

 

EIDOS PLC – NOTIFICATION  OF INTERESTS OF DIRECTOR

Eidos plc today announces that on Friday, 20 September 2002, Michael McGarvey, Chief Executive Officer, was awarded 145,000 Ordinary  shares in the Company (the "Shares'') for nil consideration under the terms of a Restricted Share Plan established pursuant to paragraph  13.13A(b) of the Listing Rules.

The Shares awarded will comprise existing shares to be immediately purchased in the market by the Trustee of the Eidos employee benefit  trust. The Trustee will hold the Shares to the Company's order for a period of three years at which time the Shares will vest and be released to  Mr McGarvey, subject to him still being in the Company's employment at that time. There are no other pre-release conditions to be satisfied.

Whilst Mr McGarvey does not currently have a beneficial interest in the Shares he does now have (and will retain during the three year  deferment period) a notifiable non-beneficial interest in the Shares.

Following this notification, Mr McGarvey has an interest over 1,396,268 Ordinary shares in Eidos derived through his employment with the  Company. His residual interest, over and above the restricted share award referred to above, are in the form of outstanding share options.

E5-1

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

857 TP 11-00553 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN EVANS, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (EDWARD L. CHASSIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered March 11, 2011) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot ( see Matter of Free v Coombe , 234 AD2d 996).

Entered: September 30, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
November 2, 2015

Mr. Timothy Fitzpatrick, Sr.

1270 N. McCarran Blvd.

Reno, NV 89512-4070

Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:

This is in response to your January 16, 2015 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0134) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from § 

91.313(a)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The proposed exemption, if 

granted, would allow you to perform aerial advertising / banner tow operations in Grumman, G164A aircraft, N8555H, serial number 1405 (N8555H). The FAA originally certificated N8555H

in 1975 when it was issued a restricted category special airworthiness certificate for the purpose 

of agriculture and pest control. In 1984, the FAA issued N8555H a restricted category special 

airworthiness certificate for the purpose of banner tow. 

By letter dated May 9, 2014, the FAA denied your FAA Form 7711-2, Application for Certificate 

of Waiver or Authorization that you submitted for aerial advertising and banner towing 

operations using N8555H. Our denial letter stated that N8555H was ineligible to hold a 

restricted category special airworthiness certificate for other than the purpose of agriculture. As a 

result, you petitioned for an exemption. 

After further review by the applicable FAA Flight Standards Service and Aircraft Certification 

Service policy divisions, we have determined that N8555H’s restricted category special 

airworthiness certificate for the purpose of banner tow is indeed valid and an exemption is not 

necessary. The Reno Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) will be informed of this final 

determination. You may submit, for evaluation by the FSDO, a new form 7711-2 application for 

authorization to conduct aerial advertising and banner towing operations using N8555H.

Therefore, we are closing out your request for exemption and will take no further action on your 

petition. 

 

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60191

Conference Calendar

__________________

ROGER L. MAYBERRY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLIE WATKINS, Chief of Police;

UNDERWRITERS,

 Defendants,

and

BILLY TURNER, Police Officer,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:93-CV-26-S-D

- - - - - - - - - -

December 19, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roger Mayberry appeals the jury's verdict in favor of the

defendant in his excessive-force civil rights suit. 

 Because Mayberry failed to move for a judgment as a matter

of law at the conclusion of the trial, appellate inquiry is
No. 95-60191

-2-

limited to whether there was any evidence to support the jury's

verdict or whether the verdict amounted to a manifest miscarriage

of justice. Coughlin v. Capitol Cement Co., 571 F.2d 290, 297

(5th Cir. 1978). We find that the record contains sufficient

evidence to support the jury's verdict and that the verdict does

not amount to a miscarriage of justice.

 Mayberry also challenges defense counsel's opening and

closing remarks; however, because Mayberry has not identified any

remarks by counsel which were improper, this argument is without

merit. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.1


September 30, 2015


Dear Mr. Tavakoli,
Reference is made to the letter agreement, dated as of March 30, 2015 (the “Letter Agreement”), between Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (“AFG”) and you, whereby the parties agreed that you would remain in the position of interim President and Chief Executive Officer until a date no later than September 30, 2015 on the terms and conditions set forth therein.


AFG hereby notifies you of its desire for you to remain in the position of interim President and Chief Executive Officer of AFG until October 31, 2015 on the same terms and conditions as set forth in the Letter Agreement.  


Please indicate your agreement to this extension and the other terms of this letter agreement by signing this letter in the space below and returning it to the undersigned.


	
			
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 
	 

	 
	AMBAC FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By
	/s/ Stephen M. Ksenak

	 
	Stephen M. Ksenak

	 
	Senior Managing Director and

	 
	General Counsel




	
	
	By signing below I agree to remain in the position of interim President and Chief Executive Officer of AFG until October 31, 2015, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Letter Agreement and this letter agreement.

	 

	/s/ Nader Tavakoli

	Nader Tavakoli

	Date:  September 30, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended July 3, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    VINCENT A. WASIKVincent A. WasikChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 26, 2005
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4400 

To authorize States to exempt certain nonprofit housing organizations from 

the licensing requirements of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. SHULER (for himself, Mr. MELANCON, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. PAUL, Ms. 

FOXX, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. 

DELAHUNT, Mr. MINNICK, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. TANNER, 

Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. CARNEY, Mr. INGLIS, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. 

COBLE, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. HILL, Ms. BEAN, Mr. CHILDERS, Mr. COSTA, 

and Mr. HARPER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To authorize States to exempt certain nonprofit housing organizations from the licensing requirements of the 

S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nonprofit Mortgage 

5 Licensing Clarification Act of 2009’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4400 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF NONPROFIT HOUSING ORGANIZA2 TIONS. 

3 Section 1504 of the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act 

4 of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5103) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting before the 

6 first comma the following: ‘‘and to subsection (c)’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 section: 

10 ‘‘(c) AUTHORITY FOR STATES TO EXEMPT NON11 PROFIT HOUSING ORGANIZATIONS.—A State may, by 

12 State law, exempt from the requirement under subsection 

13 (a)(1) (relating to registration or licensing) organizations 

14 that are exempt from taxation pursuant to section 

15 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and any 

16 employees and agents of such organizations acting as loan 

17 originators for such organizations, but only to the extent 

18 that such an organization— 

19 ‘‘(1) engages in the business of a loan origi20 nator for the purpose of promoting or facilitating 

21 homeownership for poor or low-income, disabled, or 

22 other disadvantaged persons or families, and in orig23 inating such loans offers loans— 

24 ‘‘(A) at interest rates that are lower than 

25 the bank prime loan rate, as determined under 

26 the Federal Reserve Statistical Release of seVerDate Nov 24 2008 07:38 Dec 18, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4400.IH H4400

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4400 IH

1 lected interest rates (commonly referred to as 

2 the H.15) by the Board of Governors of the 

3 Federal Reserve System, for the last day of the 

4 most recent weekly release of such rates; or 

5 ‘‘(B) that are, after adjusting for inflation, 

6 no-interest loans or loans with interest rates 

7 significantly below the interest rates for loans 

8 for purchase of single-family housing generally 

9 available in the market; and 

10 ‘‘(2) does not otherwise engage in the business 

11 of a loan originator or mortgage broker.’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Leann Jones

3:17-cv-92

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. §

405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET.

✔ Michael J. Newman

Remand

8/25/2017
#### Rehmann, Robson & Company v McMahan,

No. 90838;

reported below: 187 Mich App 36.