alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.3

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                               United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of the registrant certifies to the best of his knowledge,
that Amendment No. 2 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Dated:  April 15, 2003                     /s/ Kari Stefansson
                                           -------------------
                                           Kari Stefansson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  April 15, 2003                     /s/ Lance Thibault
                                           ------------------
                                           Lance Thibault
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
furnished to deCODE genetics, Inc. and will be retained by deCODE genetics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                                  END OF FILING
EXHIBIT 32.0
 Section 1350 CERTIFICATION
   (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Brendan J. McGillBrendan J. McGillExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to
Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and will be retained by Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1174 

KA 11-01478 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CORI L. HUBERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J.

Murphy, III, J.), rendered June 1, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled

substance in the fifth degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her

upon her plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in

the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.31). Contrary to defendant’s

contention, the record establishes that she knowingly, voluntarily and

intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v

Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver forecloses any

challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at

255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827).

Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Giant Jr. Investments, Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Javan Khazali, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Javan Khazali
-------------------
Javan Khazali
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
January 19, 2005
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 1990

WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY , Petitioner ,

v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ; CALVIN R. CLYBURN , Respondents

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board . ( 15

- 0331

- BLA )

Submitted : April 20, 2017 Decided: April 26, 2017

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Paul E. Frampton, Sarah E. Smith, BOWLES RICE LLP, Charleston, West Virginia , for Petitioner. M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Maia S. Fisher , Associate Solicitor, Gary K. Stearman, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Michelle S. Gerdano, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C. ; Timothy C. MacDonnell, Gabriella E. Alonso, Student Caseworker , Black Lung Legal Clinic, WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Lexington, Virginia , for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Westmoreland Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits
pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901

- 944 (2012). Our rev iew of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs , No. 15

- 0331

- BLA
(B.R.B. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17286 and #17287; KENTUCKY Disaster Number KY-
00087]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4630-DR), dated 
12/12/2021.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Flooding, and 
Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 12/10/2021 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 12/22/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/10/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/12/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, dated 12/12/2021, is 
hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by 
the disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Barren.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Kentucky: Monroe.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-00512 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/8/18

 Southern District of Ohio

Lora J. Montalto

3:17-CV-82

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Judgment in favor of Defendant Commissioner and against Plaintiff; the ALJ's non-disability decision is

affirmed and the case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

✔ Sharon L. Ovington

Decision and Entry
221

- 1 (Adopted January 4, 1985)

RULE 221. PLANS

(a) A person shall not conduct any operation for which these rules and regulations

require a plan without first obtaining approval of such plan by the Executive

Officer within the time interval expressed in said rules and regulations.

(b) The operation shall not be conducted contrary to any conditions specified in the

approved plan.

(c) All plans shall be submitted in a form and manner as specified by the Executive

Officer.

(d) A violation of the plan is a viol ation of the rule.

(e) A plan shall have all the rights delineated in Regulation II for permits including the

right of appeal.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

CARLA KESTER,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-42

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent case)

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING THE JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND 

(DOC. 13); (2) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE 

FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND 

(3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET

______________________________________________________________________________

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is presently before the Court on the parties’ 

joint motion to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings 

pursuant to the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 13. Based upon the stipulation of 

the parties, and for good cause shown, the ALJ’s non-disability finding is REVERSED as

unsupported by substantial evidence and the parties’ joint motion for a Sentence Four remand (doc. 

13) is GRANTED. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence 

of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. The Clerk is ORDERED to enter judgment in favor 

of Plaintiff and to TERMINATE this case on the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: July 12, 2018 s/ Michael J. Newman 

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2000 and the consolidated Statement of Financial Position at September 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
(Unaudited)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          74,093
<SECURITIES>                                    17,982
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200
<INVENTORY>                                      6,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,463
<PP&E>                                          13,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            33
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,584
<SALES>                                         31,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,133
<CGS>                                           19,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,730
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,773)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,773)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,773)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.89)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2
 DENDREON CORPORATION
2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
   1. Vesting
 2. Number of Shares and Exercise Price
 3. Type of Option
 4. Method of Payment
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)




---



##### 



(d)
 5. Whole Shares
 6. Securities Law Compliance
 7. Term earliest
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f) th
  8. Exercise
 (a)
 - 2 -




---



##### 



(b)
 9. Transferability
 (a)
 (b)
 10. Premature Disposition of an Incentive Stock Option.
 (a)
 (b)
 11. Adjustments
 - 3 -




---



##### 



12. No Employment Rights
 13. No Stockholder Rights
 14. Withholding Obligations
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 15. Notices
 - 4 -




---



##### 



16. Governing Plan Document
 17. Compliance with Section 409A of the Code
 18. Data Protection e.g.
   - 5 -
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
10.36

    


    Maximum
Amount Mortgage Contract between Guancheng and Quanzhou Branch of Bank of
Communication on April 9, 2009 (No.: 3550052009B900001300)

    


    Note:
This contract is accessory to the General Credit Contract between Guanke and
Quanzhou Branch of Bank of Communication (No.:
3550052009C000001300).

    


    
      
        	
                Date:

              	 	
                April
      9, 2009

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Mortgagee:

              	 	
                Quanzhou
      Branch of Bank of Communication, located at 550 Fengze Street,
      Quanzhou

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Mortgagor:

              	 	
                Guancheng,
      located at Houlin industrial park, Luoshan residential district,
      Jinjiang

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Security
      interest:

              	 	
                Land
      use right [with the size of 68002 square meters, the title certificate
      Number is JinGuoYong (2009)No.00341]

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Maximum
      secured amount of credit:

              	 	
                An
      aggregate amount of RMB35 million of principal, interest, compound
      interest, defaulting interest, penalty, liquidation damages and the
      expense to exercise the credit right and mortgage.

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Realization
      of mortgage:

              	 	
                If
      the mortgagor fails to repay all or part of the principal of loan or
      financed fund, advanced payment by mortgagee or corresponding interest, or
      the mortgagor failed to provide other security according to the provisions
      of the contract, the Mortgagee may foreclose the
  property.

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Guarantee:

              	 	
                If
      the mortgage is void for the reasons caused by the mortgagor, the
      mortgagor shall provide a guarantee for the maximum amount of
      credit.

              
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                Governing
      law

              	 	
                Laws
      of the People’s Republic of
China
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

Kijai Khamisi, et al.,

Plaintiff(s),
Case Number: 1:18cv87
vs.
Judge Susan J. Dlott
Joseph Deters, et al.,
Defendant(s).

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on March 5, 2019 (Doc. 133), to whom this case was referred
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the
time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired March 19, 2019, hereby
ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, plaintiffs’ motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docs.
124, 126, 128, 130, 132) are DENIED.

Plaintiffs are advised as follows:

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4), a plaintiff may file, within thirty (30) days after
service of any order, a motion with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for leave to proceed as a
pauper on appeal. Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6" Cir. 1999), overruling in part
Floyd v. United States Postal Service, 105 F.3d 274 (6" Cir. 1997). The plaintiffs motion must
include a copy of the affidavit filed in the District Court and the District Court’s statement of the

reasons for denying pauper status on appeal. Jd.; see Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).


The plaintiff is notified that if the plaintiff does not file a motion within thirty (30) days
of receiving notice of the District Court’s decision as required by Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5), or
fails to pay the required filing fee of $505.00 within this same time period, the appeal will be
dismissed for want of prosecution. Callihan, 178 F. 3d at 804. Once dismissed for want of
prosecution, the appeal will not be reinstated, even if the filing fee or motion for pauper status is
subsequently tendered, unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the plaintiff did not receive
notice of the District Court’s decision within the time period prescribed for by Fed. R. App. P.
24(a)(5). Id.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Attu | Mite,

Judge Susan J. Dibit
United States District Court
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00350]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 
    Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 
    Virtual meeting. Note: because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will 
conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the 
meeting, see the instructions below.

STATUS: 
    This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual 
meeting, go to the commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Welcoming Remarks
Motion to Instruct Staff to Prepare an Amended Form 1 Acknowledging 
Independent Expenditure-Only and Hybrid Committees
Draft Advisory Opinion 2021-13: Matthew P. Hoh
Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-00350 Filed 1-6-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Opinion issued March 21, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00376-CV

———————————

SILVER GRYPHON, L.L.C., Appellant

V.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW 

YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF CWALT, 

INC. ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-23CB, MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-23CB, MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-23CB, Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2016-84076

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment 

signed on February 17, 2022, without regard to the merits and remand the case to 
2

the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We grant the motion. Accordingly, we set aside 

the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the 

trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See

id. Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3882 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3882

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1H-Indene-1,3(2H)-dione, 2-(4-bromo-
                       3-hydroxy-2-quinolinyl)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2009

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 1H-Indene-1,3(2H)-dione, 2-(4-bromo-
                       3-hydroxy-2-quinolinyl)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1H-INDENE-1,3(2H)-DIONE, 2-(4-BROMO-3-HYDROXY-2-
              QUINOLINYL)-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      1H-Indene-1,3(2H)-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        dione, 2-(4-bromo-                                                 31/2011.......
                        3-hydroxy-2-
                        quinolinyl)-.
                        (CAS No. 10319-14-
                        9) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```