alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w8










	INcorPorateD uNDer lawS of theState of NeVaDa CUSIP 82670C 10 0 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN This
certifies that SPECIMEN is the record holder of Fully paid and nonassessable F common shares Tock,s
$o 0.01 ar value,oF p SIGNATURE GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. transferable on the books of the corporation
in person certificate or endorsed.thiscertificate is not valid transferagent until countersigned
and registered registrar. by bythe wItNeSS the facsimile corporation seal of and the the
facsimileficers. signatures Dated: couNterSIGNeD NDreGIStereD: a by mellon invesTor services llc
traNSferaGeNt a NDreGIStrar By: its duly properly authorIzeDSIGNatureINterIMreSIDeNt PSecretary







 









 












	THE SHARES OF COMPANY#fS COMMON STOCK REPRESENTED BY THIS PLAN OF REORGANIZATION FOR THE
COMPANY, AS CONFIRMED BY THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. THE TRANSFER OF SECURITIES PURSUANT TO
THE BYLAWS OF THE REORGANIZED DEBTOR. THE COMPANY HOLDER OF RECORD OF THIS CERTIFICATE WITHOUT
CHARGE UPON WRITTEN PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS. The following abbreviations, when used in
the inscription on the face of laws or regulations: TEN COM as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN
ACT TEN ENT as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor) JT TEN as joint tenants with right
of under Uniform Gifts survivorship and not as tenants Act in common (State) COM PROP as
community property UNIF TRF MIN ACT (Cust) (Minor) to Minors Act (State) Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
PLEASEINSERTSOCIALSECURITYOROTHER IDENTIFYINGNUMBEROFASSIGNEE SPECIMEN
(PLEASEPRINTORTYPEWRITENAMEANDADDRESS,INCLUDINGZIPCODE,OFASSIGNEE) shares of the capital stock
represented by within Certificate, and attorney-to transfer the said stock on the books of the
within named Dated NOTICE:
THESIGNATURETOTHISASSIGNMENTMUSTCORRESPONDWITHTHENAMEASWRITTENUPONTHE
FACEOFTHECERTIFICATEINEVERYPARTICULAR,WITHOUTALTERATIONORENLARGEMENTORANY CHANGEWHATSOEVER.
Signature(s) Guaranteed:Signature(s) Guaranteed:By THE SIGNATURE(S)SHOULD BE GUARANTEED
BYAN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS,STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LO
AN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEEMEDALLIONPROGRAM),
PURSUANTTOS.E.C.RULE 17Ad-15. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY ACCEPTABLE. SIGNATURE GUARANTEES MUST NOT BE DATED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Richard Wagner, :

:

Plaintiff, :

: Case Number: 1:17cv606

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

Restaurants Associates of Cincinnati, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been

settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action (including all claims by all parties) is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown

not later than February 21, 2018, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties

may substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement upon approval of the

Court. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce a settlement should be

aware of Kokkonen v Guardian Life Ins. Co. Of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994), and

incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

This Court explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached by

the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court

Case: 1:17-cv-00606-SJD Doc #: 9 Filed: 01/22/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 33
a6325310ex1022.htm


 


Exhibit 10.22







[COPYTELE, INC. LETTERHEAD]


 




 


January 13, 2010












Videocon Industries Limited


2nd Floor, Fort House, D.N. Road


Fort, Mumbai 400 001 (INDIA)




	
Attention:

	
Venugopal N. Dhoot, Director


	
 

	
Naveen Mandhana, Sr. Vice President









 







Dear Sirs:







With respect to the installments of the Technology Transfer Fee scheduled to be paid by February 16, 2009 and November 16, 2009, under the Amended and Restated Technology License Agreement between Videocon Industries Limited (“Videocon”) and CopyTele, Inc. (“CopyTele”), dated May 16, 2008 (the “License Agreement”), CopyTele hereby waives the February 16, 2009 and November 16, 2009 due dates for such installment payments on the condition (i) that Videocon make partial payments of such installments, the first payment for the period from September 2009 through December 2009 of $300,000 no later than January 18, 2010, and (ii) that Videocon and CopyTele agree upon a mutually acceptable payment schedule for the balance of such installments prior to May 15, 2010.  Except as specifically set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the License Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall continue to be valid and binding upon the parties thereto.







Sincerely,







COPYTELE, INC.












By:   /s/ Denis A. Krusos                                    


Denis A. Krusos


Chairman and C.E.O.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 13.1

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of BE Semiconductor
Industries N.V. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Richard W. Blickman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Richard W. Blickman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard W. Blickman
Dated: April 3, 2006                    Chief Executive Officer
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

COOLTVNETWORK.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BLACKBOARD, INC., META PLATFORMS, INC., 

FKA FACEBOOK, INC., INTERNATIONAL 

BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, 

KALTURA, INC., EDGIO, INC., MICROSOFT 

CORPORATION, OOYALA, INC., SNAP INC., 

TRAPELO CORP.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2021-2191, 2021-2192, 2021-2193, 2021-2195, 2021-2196, 

2021-2197, 2021-2198, 2021-2199, 2021-2200

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in Nos. 1:19-cv-00291-LPS-JLH, 1:19-

cv-00292-LPS-JLH, 1:19-cv-00293-LPS-JLH, 1:19-cv00294-LPS-JLH, 1:19-cv-00295-LPS-JLH, 1:19-cv-00296-

LPS-JLH, 1:19-cv-00297-LPS-JLH, 1:19-cv-00534-LPSJLH, 1:19-cv-00535-LPS-JLH, Judge Leonard P. Stark.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

Case: 21-2191 Document: 94 Page: 1 Filed: 07/07/2022
MEREDITH MARTIN ADDY, AddyHart P.C., Atlanta, GA, 

argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by 

CHARLES A. PANNELL, III; BENJAMIN CAPPEL, Chicago, IL. 

 HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued 

for all defendants-appellees. 

 MICHAEL S. NADEL, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, 

Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Blackboard, Inc. 

Also represented by CHARLES M. MCMAHON, Chicago, IL. 

 PHILLIP EDWARD MORTON, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.

 BRYAN SCOTT HALES, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, 

IL, for defendant-appellee International Business Machines Corporation. 

 SETH W. LLOYD, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Kaltura, Inc. Also represented by JENNIFER JEANNE SCHMIDT, San Francisco, CA. 

 ASIM BHANSALI, Kwun Bhansali Lazarus LLP, for defendant-appellee Edgio, Inc. Also represented by KATE 

ELLIS LAZARUS, SCOTT WILLIAM TAYLOR. 

 JOHN D. VANDENBERG, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, 

Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Microsoft Corporation. Also represented by JOSEPH THOMAS JAKUBEK. 

 RICHARD GREGORY FRENKEL, Latham & Watkins LLP, 

Menlo Park, CA, for defendant-appellee Ooyala, Inc. 

 REUBEN H. CHEN, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for defendant-appellee Snap Inc. Also represented by LAUREN 

KRICKL, BENJAMIN S. LIN. 

 RICARDO BONILLA, Fish & Richardson PC, Dallas, TX, 

Case: 21-2191 Document: 94 Page: 2 Filed: 07/07/2022
for defendant-appellee Trapelo Corp. Also represented by 

NEIL J. MCNABNAY, LANCE E. WYATT, JR. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

July 7, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2191 Document: 94 Page: 3 Filed: 07/07/2022
LABEL # 102 

 DANGER!

MAY BE FATAL IF INHALED, ABSORBED THROUGH SKIN, OR 

SWALLOWED. CONTACT MAY CAUSE SEVERE EYE IRRITATION. 

PROLONGED OR REPEATED INHALATION MAY CAUSE LIVER, 

KIDNEY, LUNG, HEART, AND REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS BASED ON 

ANIMAL DATA. 

PRECAUTIONS: Do not breathe process vapors or mists. Use only with adequate ventilation. 

Avoid process vapor / mist contact with skin and eyes. 

FIRST AID: For vapor inhalation, remove the affected individual to fresh air. If not breathing, 

give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. Seek immediate medical 

attention. In case of eye contact, flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. Seek 

medical attention if irritation persists. 

FIRE: In case of fire, use water, dry chemical, or protein type air foam to extinguish. Toxic 

combustion products may be released. Wear a self-contained breathing device. 

Read the Material Safety Data Sheet prior to handling for recommended protective equipment 

and detailed hazard and precautionary information. 

 For industrial use only
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
KENNETH CHARLES O’NEIL, Case No. 2:17-cv-978

Plaintiff,
, CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR

v.
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
QOPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Motion (ECF No. 19) and Joint Stipulation (ECF
No. 21) for an Award of Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, which are hereby
GRANTED. Plaintiff and Defendant, by their respective counsel, stipulate to an award to
Plaintiff of attorney fees and costs in the amount of $5,200.00, in full satisfaction and settlement
of any and all claims Plaintiff may have under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) in the
above case. The award of attomey fees will satisfy ali of Plaintiff's claims for fees, costs, and
expenses under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920 & 2412 in this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and
not his attorney, can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the United States
under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). Plaintiff and Defendant move that the Court award
Plaintiff EAJA fees and costs of $5,420.76.

After this award is entered, if counsel for the parties can verify that Plaintiff owes no pre-
existing debt subject to offset, the Defendant agrees to direct that the award be made payable to

Plaintiff's attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff and counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

\6-30-JolW ><

DATE EDMUND & SARGUS, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### Innes v Holland School District,

Nos. 90956, 90977.

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the order of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for consolidation with *Innes v Holland School Dist,*Court of Appeals Docket No. 138354, currently pending on application before that Court. The Supreme Court does *853not imply that the Court of Appeals must grant or deny any of the requested relief. The purpose of the order is to facilitate resolving all of the issues raised at one time. MCR 7.302(F)(1). Jurisdiction is not retained. Court of Appeals Nos. 135177,135809.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.3



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

      Rollo Entertainment Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

      FIRST: That the Board of Directors of said corporation, at a meeting duly
held, adopted resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the following
amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation:

      RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of Rollo Entertainment
Inc. be amended by changing the First Article thereto so that, as amended, said
Article shall be and read as follows:

            "FIRST: The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the
      "Corporation") is NET/GUARD Technologies, Inc."

      RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of Rollo Entertainment
Inc. be amended by changing the Fourth Article thereto so that, as amended, said
Article shall be and read as follows:

            "FOURTH: The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation
      shall have authority to issue is Twenty Million (20,000,000). The par
      value of each of such shares is $.0001. All such shares are of one class
      and are shares of common stock without cumulative voting rights and
      without any preemptive rights."

      SECOND: That in lieu of a meeting and vote of stockholders, the
stockholders have given written consent to said amendments in accordance with
the provisions of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware and written notice of the adoption of the amendments has been given as
provided in Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
to every stockholder entitled to such notice.

      THIRD: That the aforesaid amendments were duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.

                                       1



<PAGE>   2
      FOURTH: That this Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of
Incorporation shall be effective immediately upon filing.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Rollo Entertainment Inc. has caused this
certificate to be signed by E. Blaine Mansfield, its President, and attested by
Cynthia L. Hoek, its Acting Secretary, this 15th day of November, 1996.

                                        ROLLO ENTERTAINMENT INC.


                                        /s/  E. BLAINE MANSFIELD
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        E. Blaine Mansfield, President

ATTEST:


/s/  CYNTHIA L. HOEK
------------------------------------
Cynthia L. Hoek, Acting Secretary

                                       2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3963 

To provide specialized training to Federal air marshals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California (for himself, Mr. DENT, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, and Mr. CARNEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To provide specialized training to Federal air marshals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal Investigative 

5 Training Restoration Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL AIR MARSHALS. 

7 Section 44917 of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(e) CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE TRAINING PRO10 GRAM.— 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3963 IH

1 ‘‘(1) NEW EMPLOYEE TRAINING.—Not later 

2 than 30 days after the date of enactment of the 

3 Criminal Investigative Training Restoration Act, the 

4 Federal Air Marshal Service shall require Federal 

5 air marshals hired after such date to complete the 

6 criminal investigative training program at the Fed7 eral Law Enforcement Training Center as part of 

8 basic training for Federal air marshals. 

9 ‘‘(2) EXISTING EMPLOYEES.—A Federal air 

10 marshal who has previously completed the criminal 

11 investigative training program shall not be required 

12 to repeat such program. 

13 ‘‘(3) ALTERNATIVE TRAINING.—Not later than 

14 3 years after the date of enactment of the Criminal 

15 Investigative Training Restoration Act, an air mar16 shal hired before such date who has not completed 

17 the criminal investigative training program shall be 

18 required to complete a alternative training program, 

19 as determined by the Federal Law Enforcement 

20 Center, that provides the training necessary to 

21 bridge the gap between the mixed basic police train22 ing, the Federal air marshal programs already com23 pleted by the Federal air marshal and the criminal 

24 investigative training provided through the criminal 

25 investigative training program. Any such alternative 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 3963 IH

1 program shall be deemed to have met the standards 

2 of the criminal investigative training program. 

3 ‘‘(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

4 Not less than $3,000,000 is authorized to be appro5 priated for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011 to 

6 carry out this subsection. 

7 ‘‘(5) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this sub8 section shall be construed to reclassify Federal air 

9 marshals as criminal investigators.’’. 

Æ 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS
NO. 07-11-00329-CR, 07-11-00330-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

MAY 31, 2012

TERRY LYNN FLEETWOOD, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 63,731-D; HONORABLE RICHARD DAMBOLD, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

Appellant, Terry Lynn Fleetwood, was convicted of aggravated sexual assault (Cause No. 07-11-00329-CR), and aggravated assault (Cause No. 07-11-00330-CR).  On August 9, 2011, appellant filed notices of appeal in each cause.  Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to permanently abate this appeal, and has provided this Court a certified copy of appellant’s death certificate stating that appellant died on April 5, 2012.[footnoteRef:1]  At the time of appellant’s death, no mandate from this Court had been issued. [1:  We note that appellant’s appointed counsel filed appellant’s brief on March 14, 2012.] 

If an appellant in a criminal case dies after an appeal is perfected but before the mandate of the appellate court is issued, the appeal should be permanently abated.  TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(2).  The death of an appellant during the pendency of his appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction.  Hanson v. State, 790 S.W.2d 646, 646 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990) (en banc).  Consequently, these appeals and any further proceedings are ordered permanently abated.

								Mackey K. Hancock

									Justice

Do not publish.  

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-203

Judge Marbley

Davante M. Hayes 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 31) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Superseding

Indictment, and he is hereby adjudged guilty on these counts. The

Court will defer the decision of whether to accept the plea

agreement until the sentencing hearing.

Date: May 22, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: G uillermina Sandoval, et al. v. American Pointe Realty, Ltd.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 988

- CV

Trial court case number: 1 05437

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

On March 4, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that if they did not pay the appellate filing fee by April 3, 2015, this Court m ight dismiss the appeal. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3. Then o n March 1 0, 2015, t his Court granted, in part, the letter

motion by the appellants for an extension of time to pay for the reporter’s record. Th e March 10th Order notified appellants that if they fail ed to timely pay or make arrangements to pay for th at record by April 9, 2015, this Court m ight consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(c)

. On April 13, 2015, the r eporter filed an information sheet stating that the appellants had not paid

, or made arrangements to pay

, for the record , and also attached a letter refuting appellants’ counsel statement in his extension motion that he had been unable to reach the reporte r. S ince that date, there has not been a further update from the reporter regarding receipt of payment for the record ; the record has not been filed and appellants have not filed a further extension to pay for th at record or the filing fee

. Accordingly, i f the appellants do not pay the $195 appellate filing fee with the

Clerk of this Court within 10 days of the date of this Order, this appeal will be

dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 5, 42.3(c). If appellants timely pay the filing fee, this

Court will set the briefing schedule and will consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Ac ting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 2, 2015
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Financial Media Group, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
      undersigned, Albert Aimers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Javan
      Khazali, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








*April
                18, 2006*
            */s/
                Albert Aimers**--------------------**Albert
                Aimers**Chief
                Executive Officer**April
                18, 2006*
            */s/
                Javan Khazali**--------------------**Javan
                Khazali**Chief
                Financial Officer*