alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY *v.*EQUITY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

74-195

516 S.W. 2d 389

Opinion delivered December 9, 1974

*Wright, Lindsey & Jennings,*for appellant.

*Laser, Sharp, Haley, Toung & Boswell, P.A.,*for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

In November, 1972, the plaintiff’s decedent, Carrie Lovett, was fatally injured by an uninsured motorist as she was walking across a street in Little Rock. Mrs. Lovett was covered by $10,000 uninsured-motorist clauses in each of two automobile insurance policies: One, a policy issued to Mrs. Lovett by the appellee Equity Mutual upon Mrs. Lovett’s own car and, two, a policy issued by the appellant Allstate upon Mrs. Lovett’s husband’s car. Both policies provided coverage for the named insured and for his or her spouse. Liability being admitted, the only remaining question in the case is whether Equity Mutual is liable for the entire $10,000, as Allstate contends, or the two insurance companies are liable for $5,000 each, as the trial court held. We affirm.

As far as this case is concerned, the two policies are identical. Both contain excess insurance coverage, but counsel for the rival companies agree that excess coverage is not involved here. What is involved is a pro rata provision that is common to both policies and reads as follows:

> *342Except as provided in the foregoing [excess coverage] paragraph, if the insured has other similar insurance available to him and applicable to the accident, the damages shall be deemed not to exceed the higher of the applicable limits of liability of this insurance and such other insurance, and the company shall not be liable for a greater proportion of any loss to which this coverage applies than the limit of liability hereunder bears to the sum of the applicable limits of this insurance and such other insurance.

Allstate argues that Equity Mutual is the primary insurer because Equity Mutual issued the policy upon Mrs. Lovett’s own car. We need not determine whether that argument would have merit if Mrs. Lovett’s car had been involved in the fatal accident, for that is not the fact. At the time of her death Mrs. Lovett was a pedestrian. The pro rata clause contains no language peculiarly applicable to that situation. Instead, the controlling provision limits liability “if the insured has other similar insurance available to him and applicable to the accident.’’ Both policies had that provision; so we do not see why either company should bear the entire loss. That conclusion, upon similar facts, was reached in *Box*v. *Doe,*221 So. 2d 666 (La. App., 1969), cert. den., 254 La. 457, 223 So. 2d 868 (1969). To come to any other conclusion we should have to read into the policies something that is not there.

Affirmed.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44728

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JENNIFER M. SEVERIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 597

Filed: September 26, 2017

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Teton County. Hon. Gregory W. Moeller, District Judge. 

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of 

sentence, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Jennifer M. Severin pled guilty to one count of domestic battery with traumatic injury, 

Idaho Code §§ 18-903(a), 18-918(2). The district court imposed a unified sentence of six years, 

with a minimum period of confinement of two years, and retained jurisdiction. The district court 

later relinquished jurisdiction. Severin filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of 

sentence, which the district court denied. Severin appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 
2

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 

record, including any new information submitted with Severin’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude no 

abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Severin’s 

Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Inhibiton Therapeutics, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Henry
      Fong, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the SecuritiesExchange
                Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financialcondition
                and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods
                presented in theReport.








/s/
                Henry FongHenry
                FongPrincipal
                Executive Officer and
              Principal
                Financial OfficerJune
                19, 2006








A
      SIGNED
      ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED
      TO
      INHIBITON THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY INHIBITON THERAPEUTICS,
      INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
      REQUEST.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Marcy Lena Mejia, Appellant

No. 06-12-00208-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR-12-

24230). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Marcy Lena Mejia, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 17, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# Diario Oficial C 436/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 436 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 58° año24 de diciembre de 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 436

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

58° año24 de diciembre de 2015

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Información |
| | INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA |
| | Parlamento EuropeoConsejo |
| 2015/C 436/01 | Declaración del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo relativa al Reglamento (UE, Euratom) 2015/2422 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 16 de diciembre de 2015, por el que se modifica el Protocolo no 3 sobre el Estatuto del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

IV   Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Parlamento EuropeoConsejo

2015/C 436/01

Declaración del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo relativa al Reglamento (UE, Euratom) 2015/2422 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 16 de diciembre de 2015, por el que se modifica el Protocolo no 3 sobre el Estatuto del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea

o

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

IV Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Parlamento Europeo Consejo

| 24.12.2015 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2015

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

C 436/1

---

Declaración del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo relativa al Reglamento (UE, Euratom) 2015/2422 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 16 de diciembre de 2015, por el que se modifica el Protocolo no 3 sobre el Estatuto del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (1)

(2015/C 436/01)

Al final del proceso de reforma, el Tribunal General estará compuesto por dos jueces por Estado miembro. Por lo tanto, con el fin de lograr la igualdad entre mujeres y hombres, que es un objetivo de la Unión Europea conforme al artículo 3 del TUE, en el proceso de designación de candidatos a jueces del Tribunal General en virtud del artículo 254 del TFUE, los Gobiernos de los Estados miembros deben garantizar, en la mayor medida posible, una presencia igual de mujeres y hombres.

---

(1)  DO L 341 de 24.12.2015, p. 14

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Transworld Benefits International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Charles Seven, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Charles Seven
--------------------------
Charles Seven
Chief Executive Officer

March 22, 2004
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 Exhibit 4.1 
INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
CUSIP 03753U 10 6 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT BY 
AMERICAN COUNTERSIGNED 
SPECIMEN New(Brooklyn, STOCK AND 
is the owner of York) 
TRANSFER 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.0001 PAR VALUE, OF 
TRUST& REGISTERED:

APELLIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly
COMPANY endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. AUTHORIZED AND 
TRANSFER 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly 
authorized officers. SIGNATURE REGISTRAR AGENT 
Dated: 
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF SECRETARY 







 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
UTMA – ____________ Custodian ____________ 
TEN COM – as tenants in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors 
JT•TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship Act ________________________________ and not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list. 
For value received __________________ hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto 
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
(PLEASE PRINT OR
TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint 
Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated 
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY 
PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
SIGNATURE GUARANTEED 
ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR
BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND
MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 3:17-cr-195
Plaintiff,
vs. District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
KATHREN WARREN,
Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 8)

This case is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 8), wherein the Magistrate Judge recommends
that Defendant's plea of guilty to Count One and Count Two of the Information be accepted by the
Court and that Defendant be found guilty as charged in such Counts. The parties filed no
objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and the time for filing
objections has expired.

The Court, having reviewed the matter de novo, determines that the Report and
Recommendation (doc. 8) of the United States Magistrate Judge should be and is hereby
ADOPTED in its entirety. The Court ACCEPTS Defendant’s guilty plea and Defendant is
hereby adjudged GUILTY of Count One and Count Two of the Information.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date BALLS Lo.

Walter H. Rice
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:18-cr-31

Anthony Prysock 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 25) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: March 30, 2018 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4408 

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 

to eliminate automatic increases for inflation from CBO baseline projections for discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2009 

Mr. GOHMERT (for himself, Mr. AKIN, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. BARTLETT, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, 

Ms. FALLIN, Mr. FLEMING, Ms. FOXX, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. 

GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. ISSA, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of 

Texas, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. PITTS, Mr. SCALISE, and Mr. SHADEGG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to eliminate automatic increases for 

inflation from CBO baseline projections for discretionary 

appropriations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Within Our Means 

5 Budget (WOMB) Act of 2009’’, whereas from passage of 

6 this bill will come a new birth of freedom for American 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4408 IH

1 taxpayers and an end to the automatic increases for each 

2 department that have been bankrupting America. 

3 SEC. 2. CHANGES IN THE BASELINE. 

4 Section 257(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emer5 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended— 

6 (1) in the second sentence of paragraph (1), by 

7 striking everything that follows ‘‘current year,’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘excluding resources designated as an 

9 emergency requirement and any resources provided 

10 in supplemental appropriation laws.’’; 

11 (2) by striking paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and 

12 (5); 

13 (3) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para14 graph (2); and 

15 (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol16 lowing new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(3) NO ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—No 

18 adjustment shall be made for inflation or for any 

19 other factor.’’. 

20 SEC. 3. EXTENSION. 

21 The second sentence of section 275(b) of the Bal22 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 

23 is amended by inserting ‘‘other than subsections (a) 

24 through (d) of section 257’’ after ‘‘title’’. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
# Euroopan unionin C 436/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 436 |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 58. vuosikerta24. joulukuuta 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 436

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

58. vuosikerta24. joulukuuta 2015

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Tiedotteet |
| | EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET |
| | Euroopan parlamenttiNeuvosto |
| 2015/C 436/01 | Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston lausuma Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetukseen (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422, annettu 16 päivänä joulukuuta 2015, Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen perussäännöstä tehdyn pöytäkirjan N:o 3 muuttamisesta | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

IV   Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Euroopan parlamenttiNeuvosto

2015/C 436/01

Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston lausuma Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetukseen (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422, annettu 16 päivänä joulukuuta 2015, Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen perussäännöstä tehdyn pöytäkirjan N:o 3 muuttamisesta

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

IV Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Euroopan parlamentti Neuvosto

| 24.12.2015 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2015

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

C 436/1

---

Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston lausuma Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetukseen (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422, annettu 16 päivänä joulukuuta 2015, Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen perussäännöstä tehdyn pöytäkirjan N:o 3 muuttamisesta (1)

(2015/C 436/01)

Uudistusprosessin päättyessä unionin yleisessä tuomioistuimessa on kaksi tuomaria jäsenvaltiota kohti. Naisten ja miesten tasa-arvon saavuttamiseksi, mikä on Euroopan unionin tavoite Euroopan unionista tehdyn sopimuksen 3 artiklan mukaisesti, jäsenvaltioiden hallitusten olisi varmistettava mahdollisimman laajasti naisten ja miesten tasapuolinen edustus asettaessaan ehdolle henkilöitä Euroopan unionin yleisen tuomioistuimen tuomareiksi Euroopan unionin toiminnasta tehdyn sopimuksen 254 artiklan mukaisesti.

---

(1)  EUVL L 341, 24.12.2015, s. 14.

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

S&S HOLDCO, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

THREE RIVERS PROVIDER 

NETWORK, INC., 

 Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-00783

Judge William O. Bertelsman

ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (doc. 32) the Court hereby orders as follows:

1. S&S Holdco, Inc. (“Holdco”), is substituted in place of S&S Healthcare Strategies, Ltd. 

(“Healthcare) as the party plaintiff and counterclaim defendant, and the case caption on 

all future filings shall be amended accordingly. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1).

2. Notwithstanding the substitution, Healthcare shall remain subject to and obligated by all 

federal and local rules of civil procedure regarding discovery as if Healthcare had 

remained a party to this litigation, including but not limited to Civil Rules 26 through 37. 

Healthcare shall also remain subject to the jurisdiction and rulings of the Court regarding 

discovery directed to Healthcare, as if Healthcare had remained a party to this litigation.

3. Notwithstanding the substitution, both Healthcare and Holdco will be named on any jury 

verdict forms as counterclaim defendants and/or responsible parties with respect to Three 

Rivers Provider Network, Inc.’s, counterclaims.

4. Following waiver or exhaustion of any appeal rights and any rights of setoff, Holdco and 

Healthcare shall be jointly and severally liable for any final judgment obtained by Three 

Rivers Provider Network, Inc., arising out of claims asserted in this case.

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 33 Filed: 04/15/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 229
2

SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 33 Filed: 04/15/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 230
<PAGE>
Exhibit 11

LCA-VISION INC.
Computation of Per Share Earnings (Loss)
For the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994

                                     1996       1995        1994
Primary Earnings (Loss) Per 
 Share

Net income (loss)             $ (4,056,906) $  178,764   $ 1,696,531
Pro forma income tax expense $    (40,600) $ (645,000)
Pro forma net income (loss)   $ (4,056,906) $  138,164   $ 1,051,531

Shares: 
     Weighted average number of 
   common shares outstanding   19,609,505    5,659,208     1,000,000

     Additional shares assuming 
   exercise of stock options      (a)          

Weighted average number of 
   common shares adjusted       9,609,505    5,659,208     1,000,000

Earnings (loss) per share    $     (0.21)   $     .02    $     1.05

(a)     Net loss per share is based on outstanding common shares. 
Assuming exercise of options would be anti-dilutive since an
increase in the number of shares assumed to be outstanding would
reduce the amount of the loss per share.


Exhibit 21

     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

LCA-Vision (Canada) Inc.                        Ontario, Canada
The Toronto Laservision Centre (1992) Inc.      Ontario, Canada
Toronto Lasersight Centre
LCA-Vision (Ohio), Inc.                         Ohio
938051 Ontario, Inc.                            Ontario, Canada