Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 87 / Thursday, May 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 24789 

§ 72.214 List of approved spent fuel 

storage casks. 

* * * * * 

Certificate Number: 1030. 

Initial Certificate Effective Date: 

January 10, 2007. 

Amendment No. 1 Effective Date: July 

20, 2010. 

SAR Submitted by: Transnuclear, Inc. 

SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis 

Report for the NUHOMS® HD 

Horizontal Modular Storage System for 

Irradiated Nuclear Fuel. 

Docket Number: 72–1030. 

Certificate Expiration Date: January 

10, 2027. 

Model Number: NUHOMS® HD– 

32PTH. 

* * * * * 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day 

of April, 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

R.W. Borchardt, 

Executive Director for Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10677 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0008; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–ANM–21] 

Modification of Jet Route J–3; 

Spokane, WA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action modifies Jet Route 

J–3 by terminating the route at the 

Spokane, WA, VHF omnidirectional 

range/tactical air navigation (VORTAC) 

instead of the Canadian border. This 

action is necessary for the safety and 

management of instrument flight rules 

(IFR) operations within the National 

Airspace System (NAS). 

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, July 29, 

2010. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under 1 CFR part 51, 

subject to the annual revision of FAA 

Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken 

McElroy, Airspace and Rules Group, 

Office of System Operations Airspace 

and AIM, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

History 

On February 4, 2010, the FAA 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

to modify J–3 Spokane, WA. (75 FR 

5703). Interested parties were invited to 

participate in this rulemaking effort by 

submitting written comments on this 

proposal to the FAA. No comments 

were received in response to the NPRM, 

therefore, this amendment is the same 

as that proposed in the NPRM. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by 

removing the segment of J–3 that 

extends from the Spokane VORTAC to 

Cranbrook, BC. The route terminates at 

the EDGES fix located on the United 

States and Canadian border. The FAA 

has determined that this segment of J– 

3 is not required since the Jet Route, as 

currently described, terminates or 

originates at a point in space on the 

international border and does not meet 

or connect to any corresponding airway 

within Canadian airspace. Additionally, 

the segment between the Spokane 

VORTAC and Cranbrook, BC VOR/DME 

causes confusion because it appears that 

pilots can file a flight plan all the way 

to the Cranbrook, BC VOR/DME, 

however, the computer rejects the flight 

plans filed to the Cranbrook, BC VOR/ 

DME. 

Jet Routes are published in paragraph 

2004 of FAA Order 7400.9T, dated 

August 27, 2009 and effective 

September 15, 2009, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Jet Route listed in this 

document would be subsequently 

published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it modifies a Jet Route from Oakland, 

CA, to Spokane, WA. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: 

Policies and Procedures,’’ paragraph 

311a. This airspace action is not 

expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9T, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 27, 2009 and 

effective September 15, 2009, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 2004—Jet Routes 

* * * * * 

J–3 [Modified] 

From Oakland, CA, via Red Bluff, CA; 

Lakeview, OR; Kimberly, OR; Spokane, WA. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
24790 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 87 / Thursday, May 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

Issued in Washington, DC, April 29, 2010. 

Paul Gallant, 

Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules Group. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10608 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 95 

[Docket No. 30722; Amdt. No. 487] 

IFR Altitudes; Miscellaneous 

Amendments 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts 

miscellaneous amendments to the 

required IFR (instrument flight rules) 

altitudes and changeover points for 

certain Federal Airways, jet routes, or 

direct routes for which a minimum or 

maximum en route authorized IFR 

altitude is prescribed. This regulatory 

action is needed because of changes 

occurring in the National Airspace 

System. These changes are designed to 

provide for the safe and efficient use of 

the navigable airspace under instrument 

conditions in the affected areas. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, June 3, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Harry Hodges, Flight Procedure 

Standards Branch (AMCAFS–420), 

Flight Technologies and Programs 

Division, Flight Standards Service, 

Federal Aviation Administration, Mike 

Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 

South MacArthur Blvd. Oklahoma City, 

OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 

25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125) 

telephone: (405) 954–4164. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

amendment to part 95 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 95) 

amends, suspends, or revokes IFR 

altitudes governing the operation of all 

aircraft in flight over a specified route 

or any portion of that route, as well as 

the changeover points (COPs) for 

Federal Airways, jet routes, or direct 

routes as prescribed in part 95. 

The Rule 

The specified IFR altitudes, when 

used in conjunction with the prescribed 

changeover points for those routes, 

ensure navigation aid coverage that is 

adequate for safe flight operations and 

free of frequency interference. The 

reasons and circumstances that create 

the need for this amendment involve 

matters of flight safety and operational 

efficiency in the National Airspace 

System, are related to published 

aeronautical charts that are essential to 

the user, and provide for the safe and 

efficient use of the navigable airspace. 

In addition, those various reasons or 

circumstances require making this 

amendment effective before the next 

scheduled charting and publication date 

of the flight information to assure its 

timely availability to the user. The 

effective date of this amendment reflects 

those considerations. In view of the 

close and immediate relationship 

between these regulatory changes and 

safety in air commerce, I find that notice 

and public procedure before adopting 

this amendment are impracticable and 

contrary to the public interest and that 

good cause exists for making the 

amendment effective in less than 30 

days. 

Conclusion 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. It, therefore—(1) Is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. For the same reason, the 

FAA certifies that this amendment will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 95 

Airspace, Navigation (air). 

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 30, 

2010. 

James J. Ballough, 

Director, Flight Standards Service. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, pursuant to the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

part 95 of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 CFR part 95) is 

amended as follows effective at 0901 

UTC, June 03, 2010. 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 95 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 

40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44719, 

44721. 

■ 2. Part 95 is amended to read as 

follows: 

REVISIONS TO IFR ALTITUDES & CHANGEOVER POINTS

[Amendment 487 final effective date, June 03, 2010] 

From To MEA 

§ 95.1001 Direct Routes-U.S. 

Color Routes 

§ 95.510 GREEN Federal Airway G10 is amended to Read in Part 

Cape Newenham, AK NDB/DME .................................................. ST Paul Island, AK NDB/DME .................................................... #4600 

#HF COMMS Requred Below 8000 

From To MEA MAA 

§ 95.3000 Low Altitude RNAV Routes 

§ 95.3254 RNAV Route T254 is Amended to Delete 

Centex, TX VORTAC ........................................................ College Station, TX VORTAC .......................................... *3000 10000 

*2100–MOCA 

Is Amended to Read in Part 

College Station, TX VORTAC ........................................... EAKES, TX FIX ................................................................ 3000 15000 

Eakes, TX FIX ................................................................... Crepo, TX FIX .................................................................. 3100 15000 

Crepo, TX FIX ................................................................... Lake Charles, LA VORTAC ............................................. 2200 15000 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES