alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

S&S HOLDCO, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

THREE RIVERS PROVIDER 

NETWORK, INC., 

 Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL

Judge Bertelsman

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF 

CHRISTINE KAIR

Please take notice that pursuant to Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

Plaintiff, S&S Healthcare Strategies, Ltd., by and through counsel, will take the deposition of 

CHRISTINE KAIR on Tuesday, November 12, 2019 beginning at 9:00 a.m. CST. The 

deposition will be conducted at Frost Brown Todd, LLC, 100 Crescent Court, Suite 350,

Dallas, Texas 75201. Said deposition will be taken via video conference in the presence of a 

Notary Public, or some officer authorized by law to take depositions, and will continue day to 

day until completed.

Plaintiffs are taking said deposition according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 

said deposition shall be used for any purpose contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. Plaintiff reserves the right to conduct such further depositions and discovery from 

Christine Kair as may arise at a later date.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Peter A. Saba

Peter A. Saba (0055535)

Jeffrey M. Nye (0082247)

STAGNARO, SABA

& PATTERSON CO., L.P.A.

2623 Erie Avenue

Cincinnati, Ohio 45208

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 47 Filed: 11/08/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 253
2

(513) 533-2701

(513) 533-2711 (fax)

pas@sspfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing was served on all counsel of record 

via CM/ECF this 8

th day of November 2019.

/s/ Peter A. Saba

Peter A. Saba (0055535)

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 47 Filed: 11/08/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 254
901 Main Street, Suite 6000 • Dallas, Texas 75202 • (214) 953-6000 • fax (214) 953-5822 John A. Koepke (214) 953-6005 (Direct Dial) (214) 661-6660 (Direct Fax) jkoepke@jw.com

September 9, 2015

VIA E-FILE

Court of Appeals First District 301 Fannin Street Houston, Texas 77002-2066

Re: Court of Appeals Number: 01-15-00760-CV Cause No. 2014-45802 ; Carolyn P. Austin, v. Coface Seguro De Credito Mexico, S.A. De C.V., as Attorney by Endorsement for Banco Monex, S.A., Institution De Banco Multiple, Monex Grupo Financiero; in the 270 th Judicial Dist rict Court of Harris County, Texas.

Dear Clerk:

The purpose of this letter is to pay an outst anding court filing f ee of $205.00 to prosecute the appeal per Tex. R. App. P. 5.

Sincerely, John A. Koepke

John A. Koepke

JAK:cjr

14648773v.1 ACCEPTED 1-15-00760-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/9/2015 10:18:06 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
|                                                                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit 32.2
        CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|                                                                                                                                                                  

|In connection with the Annual Report of Speedus Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Finn, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or        
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and                     
|    |                                                                            
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all            
|    | material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
|    | Company.                                                                   
|    |                                                                            

|Date:  | March 31, 2005                       
|------ | -------------------------------------
|       |                                      
|By:    | /s/ Thomas M. Finn                   
|       |                          
|Name:  | Thomas M. Finn                       
|Title: | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

|47
|--
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a) on or before May 22, 2015. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43 on or before May 22, 2015.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODXL, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion Control (“Deputy Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on March 
                    ( print page 22557)
                    5, 2015, Almac Clinical Services Inc., (ACSI), 25 Fretz Road, Souderton, Pennsylvania 18964 applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
ScheduleOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IITapentadol (9780)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to import small quantities of the listed controlled substances in dosage form to conduct clinical trials. Dated: April 14, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-09333 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Spraggins *v.*Jeffries.

5-856

287 S. W. 2d 576

Opinion delivered March 5, 1956.

*Jack Holt*and *John F. Park,*for appellant.

No brief for appellee.

Lee Seamsteb, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Saline Circuit Court dismissing appellants’ complaint against the appellee for rent.

The parties entered into a sales contract January 15, 1953, and on April 27, 1954, the appellants notified the appellee, by letter, that he was behind with payments on the contract and unless the payments were brought up to date by May 15, 1954, the appellants would rescind the sales contract and collect rent from appellee. Appellee moved out and delivered possession of the premises to appellants on May 11, 1954.

The sole issue in this case is the legal effect of the following paragraph in the contract, to-wit:

> *2‘ ‘ 3. Time is the essence of this AGREEMENT, and if BUYER defaults in the payment of any installment of principal and interest for a period of 30 days, or fails to pay any taxes, assessments or insurance premiums when due, SELLER, at its option, may either declare the entire debt with interest due and payable, or rescind this AGREEMENT, and in the event of rescission all moneys paid by BUYER shall be taken and retained by SELLER, not as a penalty, but as rent of the property and the relation of the parties thereafter shall be that of landlord and tenant at the rental of $60.00 per month; and thereupon SELLER, after notice, may demand possession of the property, and BUYER agrees to surrender immediately *peacable*possession. No delay in the exercise of any of the options herein shall be construed as a waiver of such right, but same may be exercised at any subsequent time. Any notices required herein may be made by ordinary mail addressed to BUYER at Benton, Arkansas, unless SELLER be notified in writing of a subsequent change of address.”

The appellants contend for a reversal of the judgment that they are entitled to collect rent at the rate of $60.00 per month from the date of the contract until ap-pellee delivered possession of the premises. To maintain this position appellants cite, among other cases, the cases of *Thomas*v. *Johnston,*78 Ark. 574, 95 S. W. 468; *Bunting*v. *Rollins,*189 Ark. 12, 70 S. W. 2d 40; *Murphy*v. *Myar,*95 Ark. 32, 128 S. W. 359. In the above cases the court properly construed the contracts under consideration in the respective cases.

The vital part of the contract under consideration reads as follows:

> “ * * * In the event of rescission all moneys paid by buyer shall be taken and retained by seller, not as a penalty, but as rent of the property and the relation of the parties thereafter shall be that of landlord and tenant at the rental of $60.00 per month; * *

Under the plain language of the contract the rental at $60.00 per month would be applicable after the rescis*3sion date set by appellants, as of May 15, 1954. The ap-pellee moved from the premises before that date and would not be liable for rent.

Finding no error, tbe judgment is affirmed.

Justice J. S. Holt not participating.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Case No. 3:17CR036 

Plaintiff, : Judge Walter H. Rice

v. : 

DELAMAR DEMARIS THOMAS, : 

Defendant. : 

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Upon the United States’ Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture and the Court’s review of the 

record, the Court HEREBY FINDS THAT:

On July 1, 2019, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, finding that all right, 

title, and interest the following property (the “subject property”) had been forfeited to the United 

States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853 and 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c): 

• $1,142.00 in U.S. Currency; and

• Glock .45, Serial No. PSB590.

The Court also found that the defendant had an interest in the subject property and directed 

the United States to seize the subject property and to give notice of its intent to forfeit the property.

The United States gave electronic notice through the CM/ECF notification system of the 

Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture to counsel for the defendant, and the defendant did not 

object to the forfeiture. 

On February 3, 2020, the Court held the defendant’s sentencing hearing and announced the 

forfeiture of the subject property. The Judgment establishes that the defendant shall forfeit the 

subject property to the United States.

Case: 3:17-cr-00036-WHR Doc #: 84 Filed: 04/23/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 213
2 

The United States published notice of this forfeiture action and of its intent to dispose of 

the subject property in accordance with the law on an official internet government forfeiture site 

(www.forfeiture.gov) for at least 30 consecutive days, beginning on October 2, 2017. 

The United States did not send direct written notice of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture 

because no person or entity reasonably appeared to be a potential claimant with standing to contest 

the forfeiture of the subject property in the ancillary proceeding. 

No person or entity has filed a timely petition with the Court asserting any interest in the 

subject property or objecting to its proposed forfeiture. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. All right, title, and interest in the subject property is condemned and forfeited to the

United States under 21 U.S.C. § 853 and 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and no right, 

title, or interest shall remain in any other person or entity. 

2. The United States shall dispose of the subject property in accordance with the law.

3. The United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose

of enforcing this Final Order of Forfeiture. 

SO ORDERED:

Dated: __________________________________________ 

WALTER H. RICE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

04/22/2020 /s/ Walter H. Rice (tp - per Judge Rice authorization)

Case: 3:17-cr-00036-WHR Doc #: 84 Filed: 04/23/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 214
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-100), on Form S-3 (No. 333-21625), on Form S-3
(No. 333-32345), on Form S-8 (No. 333-10255), on Form S-8 (No. 333-25639), and
on Form S-8 (No. 333-43427) of Extended Stay America, Inc. of our report dated
January 24, 2001, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

                           /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


     Spartanburg, South Carolina
     February 28, 2001
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America, 

vs.

CASE NUMBER: 2-14-MJ-634

Godson A. Dodoo, 

Magistrate Judge King

 

 ORDER

At the request of counsel for Godson A. Dodoo, and without objection

by the United States, the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide to Mr. Dodoo’s

current counsel, Simakovsky Immigration Attorneys, a copy of the

complete docket in this matter. 

NORAH MCCANN KING

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Date: February 6, 2020 /s/ Norah McCann King 

 

Case: 2:17-mj-00773-EPD Doc #: 11 Filed: 02/06/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 67
**Exhibit 23**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-07621) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1995 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74485) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 1998 Long-TermStock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123522) pertaining to theLCA-Vision Inc. 2001 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-135414) pertaining to the LCA-Vision Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of our reports datedFebruary 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of LCA-VisionInc., LCA-Vision Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofLCA-Vision Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPCincinnati, Ohio
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Joseph D. Plymale,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 2:17-cv-832

Warden, Ross Correctional

Institution,

Respondent.

ORDER

Petitioner, an Ohio inmate, filed the instant habeas corpus

action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 against the Warden of the Ross

Correctional Institution, asserting claims relating to his state

court convictions for aggravated murder, aggravated robbery, having

weapons while under a disability, tampering with evidence, and a

firearm specification. On April 2, 2019, the magistrate judge

filed a report and recommendation in which he recommended that the

petition be denied with prejudice. 

The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties

that objections to the report and recommendation were due within

fourteen days, and that the failure to object to the report and

recommendation “may forfeit rights on appeal.” Doc. 10, p. 12. 

The time period for filing objections to the report and

recommendation has expired, and no objections to the report and

recommendation have been filed.

The court agrees with the report and recommendation, and the

court hereby adopts the report and recommendation (Doc. 10). The

petition is dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists

would not disagree with this conclusion, the court certifies that

any appeal would be objectively frivolous. The court denies a
certificate of appealability, and petitioner should not be

permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

Date: April 25, 2019 s/James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge 

2
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

H.H. Franchising Systems, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:18cv019 

Frederick T. Patterson, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendants. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on March 13, 2019 (Doc. 24). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including 

notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report 

and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 

1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 24) have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 24) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby 

ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's Motion 

(Doc. 22) is GRANTED and that (1) final judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff H.H. 

Franchising Systems, Inc., and against defendants Frederick T. Patterson and Nova-N-Home 

Healthcare, Inc., jointly and severally, for damages in the amount of $113,228.23. This matter 

is terminated on the docket of the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett, Judge 

United States District Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4314 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4314

        To permit continued financing of Government operations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2009

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To permit continued financing of Government operations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTINUED FINANCING OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS.

    Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended by striking the dollar amount contained therein and inserting 
``$12,394,000,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
# Azerbaijani surgeons observe EMEDS during Vigilant Guard

/ Published March 27, 2009

CAMP SANTIAGO, P.R. - Trauma surgeons of the Azerbaijani military were here for the Vigilant Guard exercise this week to observe the Expeditionary Medical System in action and adapt it to their own military.

"This is the first time I've traveled outside of Azerbaijan to participate in an event like this," said Lt. Col. Shamsaddin Rzayev, chief of trauma surgery for central medical hospital of ministry of defense, Azerbaijan.

The EMEDs was set up to deal with the influx of wounded citizens struck by the scenario's combination of an earthquake and tsunami hitting the island.

"This is an EMEDS familiarization," said Maj. Vanchai Vongchanyakul, escorting officer for the Azerbaijani soldiers and biomedical science officer with the 137th Medical Group of the Oklahoma Air National Guard, who has a state partnership with the country. "So we've invited them to come observe and participate in our EMEDS exercise."

Citizen-Airmen from the 161st Medical Group of the Arizona Air National Guard set up the EMEDS, which is a 10-bed hospital that provides surgical capability, critical care capability, chemical and bio capabilities, as well as routine medical care," said Air Force Master Sgt. George Stevens, the noncommissioned officer in charge of the Medical Readiness Training Site for the Michigan Air National Guard. "And ancillary (services), meaning radiology, pharmacy, laboratory capabilities."

Guard officials said the EMEDS fills a vital role in helping civilians after a disaster.

"It's already shown its worthiness in Kansas after a pretty bad F5 tornado took out an entire town and (Hurricane) Katrina," said Air Force Col. Michael Ward, the 161st commander. "From a homeland perspective, it's an important part of our mission as homeland defenders."

Azerbaijan wants its military to meet the standards of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and familiarize themselves with NATO equipment, such as stretchers and the EMEDS package itself.As a strategic partner, Vongchanyakul said, Azerbaijan's knowledge of American medical practice will help the joint agenda.

"They had 200 peacekeeping troops in Iraq with us," Vongchanyakul said. "Therefore, when we interoperate, we would like to be able to, if you will, sing from the same page. They want to be NATO, so any way we can help them to be NATO is essential. This is one of the steps."