alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Syndication, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Brian Sorrentino, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 20, 2006

                                        /s/ Brian Sorrentino
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Brian Sorrentino
                                        Chief Executive Officer
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

D’JANGO HENDRIX, 

Petitioner, : Case No. 1:17-cv-623 

- vs - District Judge Douglas R. Cole 

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

WARDEN, Lebanon Correctional 

 Institution, 

 

 : 

 Respondent. 

 DECISION AND ENTRY ON RESPONSE TO ORDER FOR 

CLARIFICATION 

 

 This habeas corpus action is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration 

(ECF No. 91) of the Magistrate Judge’s Decision and Order Denying Motions For Leave To 

Amend, To Expand The Record, And To Conduct Discovery (“Decision and Order,” ECF No. 87). 

In response, the Magistrate Judge ordered Petitioner to clarify whether he wished to have the 

Magistrate Judge reconsider his decision or whether, instead, he wished to have his Motion for 

Reconsideration considered as a set of objections (Order for Clarification, ECF No. 93). Petitioner 

has now responded, choosing the “objections” alternative. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk amend the docket for ECF No. 91 to 

read “Petitioner’s Objections to April 28, 2023, 87 Order on Motion for Leave to Amend, to 

Expand the Record and to Conduct Discovery by Petitioner D'Jango Hendrix.” 

Case: 1:17-cv-00623-DRC-MRM Doc #: 97 Filed: 05/19/23 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 2496
2 

 Petitioner also requests to be allowed to “add the proper Objections headings.” The request 

is denied. Adding headings is unnecessary. The Motion for Reconsideration was filed within the 

time allowed for objections and granting the requests runs the risk of confusion of the issues 

already presented. 

May 19, 2023. 

 s/ Michael R. Merz

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case: 1:17-cv-00623-DRC-MRM Doc #: 97 Filed: 05/19/23 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 2497
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 424 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 424

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the temporary 
     waiver of the required minimum distribution rules for certain 
         retirement plans and accounts for an additional year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2009

Mr. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the temporary 
     waiver of the required minimum distribution rules for certain 
         retirement plans and accounts for an additional year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Senior's Nest Egg Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY WAIVER OF REQUIRED MINIMUM 
              DISTRIBUTION RULES FOR CERTAIN RETIREMENT PLANS AND 
              ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Clause (i) of section 409(a)(9)(H) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general rule for temporary waiver of 
minimum required distribution), as added by the Worker, Retiree, and 
Employer Recovery Act of 2008, is amended by striking ``calendar year 
2009'' and inserting ``calendar years 2009 and 2010''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 409(a)(9)(H)(ii)(I) of such Code is amended by 
        striking ``2009'' and inserting ``2010''.
            (2) Section 402(c)(4) of such Code is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``2009'' the first place it appears 
                and inserting ``2009 or 2010'', and
                    (B) by striking ``2009,'' the second place it 
                appears and inserting ``2009 or 2010 (as the case may 
                be),''.
            (3) Clause (ii) of section 201(c)(2)(B) of the Worker, 
        Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 is amended by 
        striking ``2009'' and inserting ``2010''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the provisions of section 201 of the Worker, 
Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 1:17-cv-00727-SJD-SKB Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/03/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 18
Case: 1:17-cv-00727-SJD-SKB Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/03/18 Page: 2 of 4 PAGEID #: 19
Case: 1:17-cv-00727-SJD-SKB Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/03/18 Page: 3 of 4 PAGEID #: 20
Case: 1:17-cv-00727-SJD-SKB Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/03/18 Page: 4 of 4 PAGEID #: 21
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 21, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Electrified Vehicle and Energy Storage Evaluation (“EVESE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Brunswick, Mettawa, IL, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and EVESE intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On September 24, 2020, EVESE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 15, 2020 (85 FR 65423).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 21, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 25, 2021 (86 FR 58691).                

Suzanne Morris, 

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-00605 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--First-Class Package Service Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 5, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 28, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add First-Class Package Service Contract 119 to 
Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2022-36, CP2022-43.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021-28586 Filed 1-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 10.1


 








 







 


This letter agreement is between Kanis SA of P O Box 986, Third Floor, Geneva Place


 


Road Town, Tortola British Virgin Islands VG1110 and Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.
of1621 Fiske Place Oxnard, CA 93033 USA made 7th October 2015.


 


The following documents the agreed-to changes in terms for the loans from Kanis SA to
Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.


 


	
        Loan

         
	
        Principal

         
	Interest Rate	Current Maturity Date	Revised Maturity Date
	1	$1,500,000	8%	01 October 2016	01 October 2018
	2	$3,000,000	8%	01 October 2016	01 October 2018
	3	$3,000,000	8%	01 October 2016	01 October 2018


 


In consideration for this debt extension, CDTi will adjust the existing warrants in accordance
with the table below.


 


	Warrant Number	
        Revised 

         

        Expiration Date

         
	
        Number

         
	Current Strike Price	Revised Strike Price
	12-03	11 November 2019	25,000	$10.40	$1.75
	3	11 November 2019	5,000	$3.80	$1.75
	4	11 November 2019	45,000	$2.09	$1.75
	5	11 November 2019	94,000	$1.25	Unchanged
	31	11 November 2019	80,000	$1.75	Unchanged


 


 





	Kanis SA	Clean Diesel Technology, Inc.
	by: /s/ Christiane Maret	by: /s/ David E. Shea
	by: /s/ Daniel Berger	its: Chief Financial Officer
	its: Directors	 




 


 





1621 Fiske Place, Oxnard, California 93033 ●
Tel +1 805 486 4649 ● Fax +1 805 205 1333 ● www.cdti.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

KELVIN LOVETT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JEREMY EACHES, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-757

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 23)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate 

Judge reviewed the pleadings filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that 

Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be denied as moot. (Doc. 23). No objections 

were filed. 

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 

of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in 

its entirety. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Doc. 16) is DENIED as 

moot. 
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 2/27/19 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

PATRICK KELLY,

V.

Petitioner, CASE NO. 2;18-CV-19

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

WARDEN, ROSS CORECTIONAL, INST.,

Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

On September 17,2018,the Magistrate Judge issued a Report andRecommendation

("R«feR), (ECF No. 8), recommending thatRespondent's Motion to Dismiss on exhaustion

grounds, (ECF No. 5), be denied and that this CourtorderRespondent to file an Answer to the

petition. In light of Respondent's Objections, and Petitioner's Response to the same, theCourt

recommitted the matter to the Magistrate Judge forfurther analysis on October 22.2018. (ECF

No. 11)

On November 2,2018,the Magistrate Judge issued a Supplemental Report and

Recommendation ("Supplemental R&R"), (ECF No. 12). recommending again that

Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 5), bedenied. Although the parties were advised of

the right toobject to the Supplemental R&R, and ofthe consequences offailing to do so, no

objections have been filed. The Supplemental R&R. (ECF No. 12), istherefore, ADOPTED and

AFFIRMED. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 5),is DENIED. Further, and in

accordance with the Magistrate Judge's initial recommendations, the Court hereby ORDERS

Respondent to file an Answer to the petition that conforms to the requirements ofRule 5ofthe
Rules Governing §2254 Cases in the United States District Courts within SIXTY (60) DAYS of

the date that this Order is filed.

Before filing an Answer to the petition. Respondent shall file those portions ofthe state

court record needed toadjudicate any defenses made in the response. When the record isfiled

electronically, the Court's CM/ECF filing system will affix a unique PagelD number toeach

page ofthe record, displayed in the upper right-hand corner ofthe page. All papers filed in the

case thereafter by each party shall include record references tothe PagelD number. Prior to

filing the state court record. Respondent's counsel shall ensure that any borders on parts ofthe

record (typically court reporter transcripts) do not obscure thePagelD number when filed, 'fhe

record should be"indexed byinsertion of "bookmarks" in the.pdfversion of the state court

record uploaded to the Court's CM/ECF system, which displays each exhibit and the name of

that exhibit in the record.

A complete copy of the Answer and state courtrecord with PagelD numbers must be

served on petitionerat the time offiling.

Petitioner will have TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYSafter Respondent files an Answerto the

petition to file a Reply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Georee C. Smith

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Quintek Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Robert Steele, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Quintek Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Quintek Technologies, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                November 15, 2006
            By:*/s/ ROBERT STEELE*Robert
                SteeleChief
                Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:17-CR-282

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM ROGERS, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On January 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to an

Information charging him with receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1),

(b)(1). (Doc. 21). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter

before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from

coercion, and had a basis in fact. Further, the Magistrate Judge observed that at the time Defendant

entered his guilty plea, he was in full possession of his faculties, was not suffering from any apparent

physical or mental illness, and was not under the influence of narcotics or alcohol.

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of receipt of

child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1), (b)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-
MD Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc.  (403) 717-3898


 

SENTRY PETROLEUM LTD. 

SHARE OPTION PLAN 

February 28, 2009

 

OPTION COMMITMENT 

 

Notice is hereby given that, effective this 28th day of February, 2009 (the “Effective Date”) SENTRY PETROLEUM LTD. (the “Company”) has granted to Arne Raabe, an Option to acquire 150,000 Common Shares (“Optioned Shares”) up to 5:00 p.m. Pacific time on the 28th day of February, 2014 (the “Expiry Date”) at a Exercise Price of US$1.04 per share. Optioned Shares may be acquired as follows: 

			
	 

	(a) 

	1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares granted will vest twelve months after the Effective Date;


	 

	 

	 


	 

	(b) 

	a further 1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares granted will vest 24 months after the Effective Date; and


	 

	 

	 


	 

	(c) 

	the remaining 1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares granted will vest 36 months after the Effective Date.




The grant of the Optioned Shares evidenced hereby is made subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s Share Option Plan, the terms and conditions of which are hereby incorporated in this Option Commitment. 

To exercise your Option, deliver to the Company at its then principal business office, a written notice specifying the number of Optioned Shares you wish to acquire, together with cash or a certified cheque payable to the Company for the aggregate Exercise Price. A certificate for the Optioned Shares so acquired will be issued by the transfer agent as soon as practicable thereafter and will bear a legend stipulating any resale restrictions required under applicable securities laws. 

 

SENTRY PETROLEUM LTD. 



President 




I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and agree to be bound by the terms of the Plan. This commitment supersedes any prior Option or commitment made to me.

 

OPTIONEE 

ARNE RAABE_______________________________

Name:       
__Arne Raabe_______________________

Address:    ___________________________________

                 ___________________________________
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A; J ON S US T AR I C H, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l ees, v. MAR K O T T OV I C H, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 17326 D . C. N o . 3 : 1 1 - c v - 0 1 7 9 3 - J SW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J e f f r e yS . W hi t e , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r9, 2012 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , M U R G U IA , an dW A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a rk O tt ovi c h appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rgr a nt i ng the go vernm ent ’ s pet i t i on t o enforce asum m on s a gai nsthi m i n con nect i on w i th an i nve s t i ga t i on i nt o i nc om e t a x l i abi l i t i e s of hi s m othe r ’ s e s t a t e . W e ha ve 

# FI LED OC T 16 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 17326 2 ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w f o rc le a re rr o r . U

ni ted States v. B lac km an , 7 2 F. 3 d 1 4 1 8 , 1 4 2 2 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 5 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i d n o tcl earl y err b y g ran t i n g th e p et i t i o n b ecau se O tto v ic h f

a ile d to r e b u t th e g o v e rn m e n t’s s h o w in g th a t th e s u m m o n s w a s is s u e din g o o df a ith . See Stew art

v. U ni ted States , 511 F . 3d 1251, 1254- 55 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( e xpl a i ni ng t a xpa y e r ’ s “ he a vy ” bur de n t o s how a n abus e of pr oc e s s orl a c k of

good f a ith o n c e g o v e rn m e n t m a k e s p r im af a c ie s h o w in g th a t th e s u m m o n s w a s is s u e d in g o o df a ith ) ; Crystalv. U

ni ted States , 172 F . 3d 1141, 1144 ( 9th C i r . 1999) ( “ T he gove rnm e nt ’ s bur de n i s as l i ghtone , a nd m a ybe s a t i s f i e d byade c l a r a t i on f

r om the in v e s tig a tin g a g e n t[ .]” ( c ita tio n a n din te rn a l qu o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) ) . AF F I RME D.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00551-CV

In the INTEREST OF A.M.F. and J.P., Children

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PA-02295

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order signed July 16, 

2013, terminating the parental rights of Oscar Mata is AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed against 

appellant because he is indigent.

SIGNED December 11, 2013.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice