### 45607 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Notices

‘‘ Final Recommendations of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force ’’

.

**SUMMARY :**  On June 12, 2009, the President established an Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force, led by the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality. The Task Force was charged with developing, with appropriate public input, a recommended national policy for the stewardship of the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes; a framework for policy coordination, including specific recommendations to improve coordination and collaboration among Federal, State, tribal, and local authorities, and regional governance structures; an implementation strategy that identifies a set of priority objectives; and a framework for effective costal and marine spatial planning.

On July 19, 2010, the Task Force submitted its Final Recommendations to the President. They provide: (1) Our Nation’s first ever National Policy for the Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes; (2) a strengthened governance structure to provide sustained, high-level, and coordinated attention to ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes issues; (3) a targeted implementation strategy that identifies and prioritizes nine categories for action that the United States should pursue; and (4) a framework for effective coastal and marine spatial planning that establishes a comprehensive, integrated, ecosystem-based approach to address conservation, economic activity, user conflict, and sustainable use of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes resources.

**DATES :**  None.

**ADDRESSES :**  The Task Force’s Final Recommendations are available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/oceans or by writing to The Council on Environmental Quality, Attn: Michael Weiss, 722 Jackson Place, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Michael Weiss, Deputy Associate Director for Ocean and Coastal Policy, (202) 456–3892.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On June 12, 2009, President Obama issued a Memorandum to the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies that established an Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force, led by the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality. That Presidential memo charged the Task Force with, within 90 days, developing recommendations that include: (1) A national policy for the oceans, our coasts, and the Great Lakes; (2) a United States framework for policy coordination of efforts to improve stewardship of the oceans, our coasts, and the Great Lakes; and (3) an implementation strategy that identifies and prioritizes a set of objectives the United States should pursue to meet the objectives of a national policy. On September 17, 2009, the Task Force’s Interim Report addressing these three items was issued for 30 days public comment. The comment period ended on October 17, 2009.

The Task Force was also charged with, within 180 days, developing a recommended framework for effective coastal and marine spatial planning. The memorandum provides that the framework should be ‘‘ a comprehensive, integrated, ecosystem-based approach that addresses conservation, economic activity, user conflict, and sustainable use of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes resources consistent with international law, including customary international law as reflected in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. ’’ On December 14, 2009, the Task Force’s Interim Framework addressing this item was issued for 60 days public comment. The comment period ended on February 12, 2010.

In response to this direction, the Task Force has completed its Final Recommendations of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force (Final Recommendations). The Task Force Final Recommendations set a new direction for improved stewardship of the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes. They provide: (1) Our Nation’s first ever National Policy for the Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes; (2) a strengthened governance structure to provide sustained, high-level, and coordinated attention to ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes issues; (3) a targeted implementation strategy that identifies and prioritizes nine categories for action that the United States should pursue; and (4) a framework for effective coastal and marine spatial planning that establishes a comprehensive, integrated, ecosystem-based approach to address conservation, economic activity, user conflict, and sustainable use of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes resources.

The Final Recommendations are now available at the National Ocean Council Web site at http://www.whitehouse.gov/

oceans.

Dated: July 27, 2010. Nancy Sutley, Chair, Council on Environmental Quality.
[FR Doc. 2010–18950 Filed 8–2–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3125–W0–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY** 

**[OE Docket No. EA–281–B]**

**Application To Export Electric Energy; Manitoba Hydro** 

**AGENCY :**  Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE.

**ACTION :**  Notice of application.

**SUMMARY :**  Manitoba Hydro (Manitoba) has applied to renew its authority to transmit electric energy from the United States to Canada pursuant to section 202(e) of the Federal Power Act (FPA).

**DATES :**  Comments, protests, or requests to intervene must be submitted on or before September 2, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments, protests or requests to intervene should be addressed as follows: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Mail Code: OE–20, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–0350 (FAX 202– 586–8008).

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Christopher Lawrence (Program Office) 202–586–5260 or Michael Skinker (Program Attorney) 202–586–2793.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to sections 301(b) and 402(f) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7151(b), 7172(f)) and require authorization under section 202(e) of the FPA (16 U.S.C. 824a(e)).

On November 17, 2003, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued Order No. EA–281, which authorized Manitoba to transmit electric energy from the United States to Canada as a power marketer using existing international transmission facilities for a two-year term. DOE renewed the Manitoba export authorization as of November 17, 2005, in Order No. EA– 281–A for an additional five-year term. That Order will expire on November 17, 2010. On July 15, 2010, Manitoba filed an application with DOE for renewal of the export authority contained in OrderNo. EA–281–A for an additional tenyear term.

The electric energy that Manitoba proposes to export to Canada would be surplus energy purchased from electric utilities, Federal power marketing agencies, and other entities within the United States. The existing international transmission facilities to be utilized by Manitoba have previously been authorized by Presidential permits issued pursuant to Executive Order 10485, as amended, and are appropriate


### 45608 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Notices

for open access transmission by third parties.

Procedural Matters: Any person desiring to become a party to these proceedings or to be heard by filing comments or protests to this application should file a petition to intervene, comment, or protest at the address provided above in accordance with §§ 385.211 or 385.214 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Fifteen copies of each petition and protest should be filed with DOE on or before the date listed above.

Comments on the Manitoba application to export electric energy to Canada should be clearly marked with Docket No. EA–281–B. Additional copies are to be filed directly with K. Jennifer Moroz, Manitoba Hydro Law Department, 360 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3C 0G8 and Giuseppe Fina, Bruder, Gentile & Marcoux, L.L.P., 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20006. A final decision will be made on this application after the environmental impacts have been evaluated pursuant to DOE’s National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures (10 CFR part 1021) and after a determination is made by DOE that the proposed action will not adversely impact on the reliability of the U.S. electric power supply system.

Copies of this application will be made available, upon request, for public inspection and copying at the address provided above, by accessing the program Web site at http:// www.oe.energy.gov/ permits

_ pending.htm, or by e-mailing Odessa Hopkins at Odessa.Hopkins@hq.doe.gov.

Issued in Washington, DC, on July 28,
2010. Anthony J. Como, Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2010–19018 Filed 8–2–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6450–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of**  **2000; Corrected Revision to List of Covered Facilities** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of Energy.

**ACTION :**  Notice of corrected revision of list of covered facilities.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Energy ( ‘‘Department’’ or ‘‘DOE ’’ ) periodically publishes or revises a list of facilities covered under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000, as amended ( ‘‘EEOICPA ’’ or ‘‘Act’’ ). On June 30, 2010, DOE published a notice (75 FR 37781) that amended the previous lists. DOE has determined that the June 30, 2010, notice should be replaced. This corrected notice now replaces the previous lists by removing two facilities designated as atomic weapons employer (AWE) facilities that should not have been so designated. Previous lists or revisions were published on April 9, 2009, June 28, 2007, November 30, 2005, August 23, 2004, July 21, 2003, December 27, 2002, June 11, 2001, and January 17, 2001.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Patricia R. Worthington, Ph.D, Director, Office of Health and Safety (HS–10), (301) 903–5926.

**ADDRESSES :**  The Department welcomes comments on this notice. Comments should be addressed to: Patricia R. Worthington, Ph.D, Director, Office of Health and Safety (HS–10), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Purpose

The EEOICPA establishes a program to provide compensation to certain employees who develop illnesses as a result of their employment with AWEs, DOE and its predecessor Agencies, certain of its contractors and subcontractors, and listed beryllium vendors. Section 3621(4) of the Act (codified at 42 U.S.C. 7384l(4)) defines an AWE as ‘‘ an entity, other than the United States, that—(A) processed or produced, for use by the United States, material that emitted radiation and was used in the production of an atomic weapon, excluding uranium mining and milling; and (B) is designated by the Secretary of Energy as an [AWE] for the purposes of the compensation program. ’’ Section 3621(5) defines an AWE facility

as ‘‘ a facility, owned by an [AWE], that is or was used to process or produce, for use by the United States, material that emitted radiation and was used in the production of an atomic weapon, excluding uranium mining or milling. ’’

It has recently come to the attention of the Department that one facility was previously mistakenly designated as an AWE facility because the designated facility was owned by the U.S. Government, and the statutory definitions of AWE and AWE facility exclude facilities owned by the United States. A second entity identified as an AWE facility is being removed from the list because the work performed by that entity was not related to production of an atomic weapon and was not performed for, or on behalf of, DOE or its predecessor Agencies.

This notice formally makes the changes to the list as indicated below:

• Painsville Site (Diamond Magnesium Company) of Ohio is no longer designated as an AWE facility because the work performed at that site was not related to atomic weapons production and was not conducted by, or on behalf of, DOE or its predecessor Agencies.

• St. Louis Airport Storage Site is no longer designated as an AWE facility because the facility was owned by the U.S. Government. This change has no effect on the determination of the Department of Labor that the work site is a DOE facility.

Issued in Washington, DC, on July 26,
2010. Glenn S. Podonsky, Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer, Office of Health, Safety and Security.
[FR Doc. 2010–19020 Filed 8–2–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6450–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future,**  **Transportation and Storage Subcommittee** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy.

**ACTION :**  Notice of open meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces an open meeting of the Transportation and Storage (T&S) Subcommittee. The T&S Subcommittee is a subcommittee of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future (the Commission). The establishment of subcommittees is authorized in the Commission’s charter. The Commission was organized pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, 86 Stat. 770) (the Act). This notice is provided in accordance with the Act.

**DATES :**  Thursday, August 19, 2010, 8:30 a.m.–5 p.m.

**ADDRESSES :**  Washington Marriott Hotel, 1221 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Timothy A. Frazier, Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585; telephone (202) 586–4243 or facsimile (202) 586–0544; e-mail CommissionDFO@nuclear.energy.gov. Additional information will be available
at http://www.brc.gov.