Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2022 / Notices 79 

1See Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel 

Plate from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary 

Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019, 86 FR 34718 (June 30, 2021) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results,’’ dated October 1, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Cut-To Length 

Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from the Republic of 

Korea; 2019: Post-Preliminary Analysis 

Memorandum,’’ dated October 19, 2021 (PostPreliminary Analysis Memorandum). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 2019: Certain Cut-ToLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from the 

Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See Notice of Amended Final Determination: 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate 

from India and the Republic of Korea; and Notice 

of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Cut-toLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from France, 

India, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea, 

65 FR 6587 (February 10, 2000) (Order). 

6See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results 

of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 37386, 37387 (June 

29, 2010). 

7See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–837] 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate From the Republic of 

Korea: Final Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. 

(Hyundai Steel), a producer and 

exporter of certain cut-to-length carbonquality steel plate from the Republic of 

Korea (Korea). The period of review 

(POR) is January 1, 2019, through 

December 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable January 3, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Conniff or David Lindgren, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1009 or (202) 482–1671. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of this review on June 30, 2021.1

On October 1, 2021, Commerce 

extended the final results of review to 

December 23, 2021.2 Subsequently, on 

October 20, 2021, Commerce issued its 

post-preliminary analysis.3 For a 

description of the events that occurred 

since the Preliminary Results, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.4

Scope of the Order 5

The product covered by this Order is 

certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel 

plate. For a complete description of the 

scope of this order, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in interested parties’ 

briefs are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. A list of topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

After evaluating the comments 

received from interested parties and 

record information, we have made no 

changes to the net subsidy rate 

preliminarily calculated for Hyundai 

Steel in the Preliminary Results as 

updated in the post-preliminary 

analysis. However, as discussed in the 

section below, we have revised the rate 

for the non-selected companies as 

calculated in the Preliminary Results. 

For a discussion of these comments, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not directly address the subsidy rate 

to be applied to companies not selected 

for individual examination where 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(e)(2) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). However, 

Commerce normally determines the 

rates for non-selected companies in 

reviews in a manner that is consistent 

with section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation. 

Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act provides 

that ‘‘the individual countervailable 

subsidy rates determined under 

subparagraph (A) shall be used to 

determine the all-others rate under 

section 705(c)(5) {of the Act}.’’ Section 

705(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that for 

companies not investigated, in general, 

we will determine an all-others rate by 

weight-averaging the countervailable 

subsidy rates established for each of the 

companies individually investigated, 

excluding zero and de minimis rates or 

any rates based solely on the facts 

available. 

Accordingly, to determine the rate for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination, Commerce’s practice is to 

weight average the net subsidy rates for 

the selected mandatory companies, 

excluding rates that are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available.6 Because we have determined 

that Hyundai Steel received 

countervailing subsidies that are above 

de minimis and are not based entirely 

on facts available, we will apply 

Hyundai Steel’s net subsidy rate to the 

non-selected companies Dongkuk Steel 

Mill Co., Ltd., BDP International and 

Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd. See the Issues 

and Decisions Memorandum for a 

discussion of assigning this rate to DSM. 

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of 

the Act. For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 

find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a 

government-provided financial 

contribution that gives rise to a benefit 

to the recipient, and that the subsidy is 

specific.7 For a description of the 

methodology underlying all of 

Commerce’s conclusions, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

We determine that, for the period 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019, the following net countervailable 

subsidy rates exist: 

Company 

Subsidy rate 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd ......... 0.56 

Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd .. 0.56 

BDP International ................. 0.56 

Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd ........ 0.56 

Disclosure 

No changes were made to the 

preliminary and post-preliminary 

calculations for Hyundai Steel; 

therefore, there are no calculations to 

release for Hyundai Steel. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
80 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2022 / Notices 

Assessment Rate 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review, for Hyundai 

Steel at the applicable ad valorem 

assessment rate listed. Commerce 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

this review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Rates 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce 

intends to instruct CBP to collect cash 

deposits of estimated countervailing 

duties in the amounts shown for the 

companies listed above on shipments of 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to 

continue to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties at the 

most recent company-specific or allothers rate applicable to the company, 

as appropriate. These cash deposits, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

subject to sanction. 

Notice to Interested Parties 

These final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 23, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. List of Issues 

III. Background 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Period of Review 

VI. Subsidies Valuation Information 

VII. Analysis of Programs 

VIII. Discussion of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether the Korea Emissions 

Trading System is Countervailable 

Comment 2: Whether Provision of Port 

Usage Rights at the Port of Incheon is 

Countervailable 

Comment 3: Whether Electricity is 

Subsidized by the Government of the 

Republic of Korea 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Select Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. as a 

Voluntary Respondent 

Comment 5: Selection of a Final Rate for 

Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–28403 Filed 12–30–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

[Docket No.: ED–2021–SCC–0146] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget for Review 

and Approval; Comment Request; 

Magnet Schools Assistance Program— 

Government Performance and Results 

Act (GPRA) Table Form 

AGENCY: Office of Innovation and 

Improvement (OII), Department of 

Education (ED). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is 

proposing an extension without change 

of a currently approved collection. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before February 

2, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for proposed 

information collection requests should 

be sent within 30 days of publication of 

this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/ 

do/PRAMain. Find this information 

collection request by selecting 

‘‘Department of Education’’ under 

‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ then check 

‘‘Only Show ICR for Public Comment’’ 

checkbox. Comments may also be sent 

to ICDocketmgr@ed.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

specific questions related to collection 

activities, please contact Gillian CohenBoyer, (202) 401–1259. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department of Education (ED), in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general 

public and Federal agencies with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed, 

revised, and continuing collections of 

information. This helps the Department 

assess the impact of its information 

collection requirements and minimize 

the public’s reporting burden. It also 

helps the public understand the 

Department’s information collection 

requirements and provide the requested 

data in the desired format. ED is 

soliciting comments on the proposed 

information collection request (ICR) that 

is described below. The Department of 

Education is especially interested in 

public comment addressing the 

following issues: (1) Is this collection 

necessary to the proper functions of the 

Department; (2) will this information be 

processed and used in a timely manner; 

(3) is the estimate of burden accurate; 

(4) how might the Department enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (5) how 

might the Department minimize the 

burden of this collection on the 

respondents, including through the use 

of information technology. Please note 

that written comments received in 

response to this notice will be 

considered public records. 

Title of Collection: Magnet Schools 

Assistance Program—Government 

Performance and Results Act (GPRA) 

Table Form. 

OMB Control Number: 1855–0025. 

Type of Review: Extension without 

change of a currently approved 

collection. 

Respondents/Affected Public: State, 

Local, and Tribal Governments. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 162. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 81. 

Abstract: This is a request for 

extension of a currently approved 

collection. The collection of this 

information is part of the governmentwide effort to improve the performance 

and accountability of all federal 

programs, under the Government 

Performance and Results Act (GPRA) 

passed in 1993, the Uniform Guidance, 

and the Education Department General 

Administrative Requirements (EDGAR). 

Under GPRA, a process for using 

performance indicators to set program 

performance goals and to measure and 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES