alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0327 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STEVEN ERIC WALKS,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 3 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2024

02/28/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0327
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

STATE OF OHIO
EX REL TED MARCUM,

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:17-cv-437

- VS - District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

SHERIFF DAVE DUCHAK,

Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON
MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 58).
On April 16, 2018, the Magistrate Judge to whom this case is assigned filed a Report and
Recommendations recommending the motion be denied (ECF No. 59). Plaintiff was notified that
any objections to that Report were required to be filed within seventeen days, i.e., not later than
May 3, 2018. That time has now expired and no objections have been filed.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendations are ADOPTED and Plaintiff's Motion for

Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 58) is DENIED.

May ‘T_, 2018.

i} =
lu Qe Moe
Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Andrew D. Hyder, certify that:





1.         I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Subjex Corporation (the “Registrant”);





2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4          I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:





(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)        Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on evaluation; and





(d)       Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.          I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the Registrant’s board of directors:





(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial formation; and













Date: May 21, 2010
By:
/s/ Andrew D. HyderAndrew D. HyderPresident & Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      11,016,071
<SECURITIES>                                 7,832,174
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,554,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,516,180
<PP&E>                                       1,765,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                (624,633)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,633,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,818,943
<BONDS>                                     19,294,731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,940,117
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,633,390
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,412,644
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (14,896,921)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            (1,113,069)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (4,610,963)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,791,691
<INCOME-TAX>                                (3,692,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,099,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,099,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4314 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 245
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4314

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2009

                                Received

            December 18 (legislative day, December 17), 2009

                          Read the first time

                           December 18, 2009

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
        To permit continued financing of Government operations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTINUED FINANCING OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS.

    Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended by striking the dollar amount contained therein and inserting 
``$12,394,000,000,000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 245

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 4314

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

        To permit continued financing of Government operations.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 18 (legislative day, December 17), 2009

                          Read the first time

                           December 18, 2009

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
#### Arnold WOOD d/b/a Arnold Wood Radio and TV Service *v.*Ned DOWNING

5-4271

418 S. W. 2d 800

Opinion delivered October 2, 1967

*James E. Evans*and *Curtis E. Rickard,*for appellant.

*Bass Trumbo,*for appellee.

Paul Ward, Justice.

This litigation concerns a “lay-a-way” sale of a color television set.

*121Arnold Wood d/b/a Arnold Wood Radio and TV Service (appellant) is engaged in retailing and servicing radios and TV sets in Springdale.

On January 5, 1966 Ned Downing (appellee) made an agreement with, appellant, at his store, to buy a specific color TV set for the price of $450. He paid $100 down and agreed to pay the balance upon delivery at a later date. The agreed date and term of delivery are in dispute, and this dispute is the issue in question.

Early in May of 1966 appellee went to the store to pay the balance due and pick up the set, and he was informed by appellant that he had sold the set to another person and that he had no other set of the same make. Appellee then demanded the return of the $100; appellant refused, and appellee instituted suit to collect the money.

A trial before the court, sitting as a jury, resulted in a judgment against appellant, and he now prosecutes this appeal.

Appellant’s testimony is, in substance, that: At the time the sale was made at his store it was agreed and understood by both parties that appellee was to pay the balance of $350 and pick up the set within thirty days; he put the set in storage and held it until about the last of April when he sold it to another person, and; appellee did not come back to pay for, and pick up, the set until around the first of May.

Appellee and his wife (who was also present) testified in substance: They informed appellant, when the sale was made, that they were building a house in Springdale and did not want to accept delivery until the house was finished which would be sometime about the first of March; appellee went back in April and told appellant the house was not finished, and was informed the set was in storage; they went back later when the house was finished and were told the set had been sold *122to another person, and; appellant refused to refund the $100.

The record reveals some corroboration of appellee’s version, (a) Appellant’s wife (who works in his store and was present when the sale was made) admitted she heard something about the construction of the house, (b) Clarence Payne, who was building the house for appellee, is a cousin to appellant, (c) The original sales slip shows these words written on the bottom — ‘ ‘ in cash, no credit”, but these words were not on the copy given to appellee.

In view of the above it is our opinion that the decision of the trial court (sitting as a jury) is supported by substantial evidence. Also we point out that appellant, after the lapse of thirty days from January 5th, was still holding the set in storage and that he did not give appellee notice he intended to sell the same to another party. Under the situation here we think appellee was entitled to a reasonable notice under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 85-2-706 (3) (Add. 1961).

Affirmed.
|Exhibit 99.2


In connection with the Annual Report
of IMPATH Inc. and Subsidaries (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, James V. Agnello Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 4) | The
information contained in the Report           fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By /s/ JAMES V. AGNELLO2

James V. Agnello
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

2 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to IMPATH Inc. and will be retained by IMPATH Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


9
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,
vs. : Case No. 3:17erl91
JAMON KAREEM GASKINS, : JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
Defendant.

PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER; TRIAL DATE AND OTHER DATES SET

Date of Scheduling Conference 1/11/2018
Jury Trial Date 3/12/2018
Final Pretrial Conference (by telephone) Monday, 3/5/2018 at 5:00 pm

Motion Filing Deadline

Oral and Evidentiary Motions 2/12/2018
Other Motions 2/19/2018
Discovery Cut-off 2/26/2018
Speedy Trial Deadline 3/20/2018
Discovery out — Plaintiff to Defendant by close of business 1/19/2018
January 11, 2018 WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 99.4

Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer
of Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation, (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the
best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements
of  section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed
original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to
the  registrant  and will be retained by it and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated May 14, 2003.                                      /s/ Royis Ward
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         Royis Ward
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Pharmaceutical ProductDevelopment, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Linda Baddour, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

 

Date: March 4, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

 

Anthony Matthews, 

Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 3:18-cv-026 

v. Judge Thomas M. Rose 

Randy Betsinger, et al., 

Defendants. 

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

NEWMAN (DOC. 20) THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A 

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION (DOC. 18) BE DENIED. 

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate 

Judge Michael J. Newman, (Doc. 20), that recommends that Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary 

restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. 18) be denied. 

As required by 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court 

has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that the 

Report and Recommendation is correct. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS Report and 

Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman, (Doc. 20), and 

DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. (Doc. 
2 

18). 

DONE and ORDERED this Friday, July 27, 2018. 

s/Thomas M. Rose 

 ________________________________ 

THOMAS M. ROSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN OHIO DISTRICT

EASTERN DIVISION

CAMERON PADGETT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:17-CV-919

JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF

OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

 This matter is before the Court on its own motion. The undersigned was randomly

assigned to this case on October 22, 2017. An order reassigning this case was inadvertently

entered in this case on October 23, 2017. The Court hereby VACATES this order and this case

will remain assigned to the undersigned judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

ALGENON L. MARBLEY, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 2:17-cv-00919-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/23/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 33
1

4279318.1 : 00103 00101 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Cameron Padgett, :

:

Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:18-cv-13

:

vs. : Judge Susan J. Dlott

:

Neville G. Pinto, :

:

Defendant. :

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective 

counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against all 

Defendant(s) pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Stipulations 

agreed to between below listed Counsel and memorialized by e-mail on April 23, 2018 are 

binding on the parties and incorporated into this dismissal. Each party to bear their own 

attorney’s fees and costs.

/s/ Mark Landes

Mark Landes (0027227)

E-mail: mlandes@isaacwiles.com

Mark Weaver (0065769)

E-mail: mweaver@isaacwiles.com

Andrew Yosowitz (0075306)

E-mail: ayosowitz@isaacwiles.com

Shawn K. Judge (0069493)

E-mail: sjudge@isaacwiles.com

Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder & Teetor, LLC

2 Miranova Place, Suite 700

Columbus, Ohio 43215

Tel: 614-221-2121; Fax: 614-365-9516

Attorneys for Defendant 

/s/ James E. Kolenich per email authority

4/24/2018

James E. Kolenich

E-mail: Jek318@gmail.com

KOLENICH LAW OFFICE

9435 Waterstone Blvd. 3140

Cincinnati, OH 45249

Tel: (513) 444-2150; Fax (513) 297-6065

Attorney for Plaintiff Cameron Padgett

Case: 1:18-cv-00013-SJD Doc #: 19 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 94
2

4279318.1 : 00103 00101 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 25, 2018, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically. 

Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. 

Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system. 

 /s/ Mark Landes

Mark Landes (0027227)

Case: 1:18-cv-00013-SJD Doc #: 19 Filed: 04/25/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 95
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Case No. 3:17CR195

vs

Kathren Warren

ORDER TERMINATING PROBATION

The above named was placed on Probation on April 10, 2019, for a period of 5 years. Based on
the recommendation of the U.S. Probation Officer and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered

that the defendant is discharged from Probation and that the proceedings in the case be

terminated.

Dated this ©], day of @rke|wo 2019

(Roe

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4457 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4457

To provide for the payment to the City of New York and Washington, DC, 
 of amounts attributable to the unpaid fully adjudicated parking fines 
  and penalties issued to foreign governments, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2010

Mr. Weiner (for himself and Mr. McMahon) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the payment to the City of New York and Washington, DC, 
 of amounts attributable to the unpaid fully adjudicated parking fines 
  and penalties issued to foreign governments, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS TO THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND 
              WASHINGTON, DC, ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE UNPAID FULLY 
              ADJUDICATED PARKING FINES AND PENALTIES ISSUED TO FOREIGN 
              GOVERNMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
including Acts making appropriations for the Department of State, 
foreign operations, and related programs, the Secretary of State shall, 
in any fiscal year, pay to the City of New York and Washington, DC, as 
the case may be, an amount equal to the total amount attributable to 
unpaid fully adjudicated parking fines and penalties issued during any 
such fiscal year by the City of New York or Washington, DC, as the case 
may be, to foreign governments that pursuant to such appropriations 
Acts are withheld from obligation for assistance provided during any 
such fiscal year to such governments. Any such payment accepted by the 
City of New York or Washington, DC, as the case may be, shall be deemed 
to satisfy in full any such unpaid fully adjudicated parking fines and 
penalties at issue and as a waiver of such city's right to pursue 
collection of such fines and penalties through any other method.
    (b) Definitions.--The terms ``fully adjudicated'' and ``parking 
fines and penalties'' have the meanings given such terms in subsection 
(f) of section 7055 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and 
Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (division H of Public Law 
111-8), except that the definition of ``parking fines and penalties'' 
shall not include the end date specified in paragraph (2)(B) of such 
subsection for purposes of this Act.
                                 <all>
```