alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-Q of Microtune, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. Fontaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|/s/    JAMES A. FONTAINE                
|James A. FontaineChief Executive Officer



Date: October 27, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JASON A. COOK 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL J. KENDLE, et al., 

Defendants. 

 

Case No.: 2:18-cv-57 

Judge George C. Smith 

Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura 

ORDER 

 This matter is before the Court upon the Motion of Defendants Auto-Owners Mutual 

Insurance Company and Michael J. Kendle (“Defendants”) for Amended Order and Final 

Appealable Order (Doc. 21). 

On September 20, 2018, Magistrate Judge Vascura dismissed all of Plaintiff’s claims 

against Defendants with prejudice and remanded the remaining state-law cross-claim by AutoOwners Mutual Insurance Company against Michael Kendle. (Doc. 20). Defendants ask the Court 

to amend the September 20, 2018 Order to state that it is a final appealable order as there is no just 

reason for delay. The Court finds that, after consideration of all relevant factors as provided by 

the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Corrosioneering, Inc. v. Thyssen Envtl. Sys., Inc., 807 F.2d 

1279, 1282 (6th Cir. 1986), all factors weigh in favor of certification under Rule 54(b), and there 

is no just reason for delay of appellate review. 

Based on the above, the Defendants’ Motion for Amended Order and Final Appealable 

Order is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter final judgment in favor of Defendants on 

Plaintiffs’ claims. 
2 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ George C. Smith _ 

 GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<CIK>          0000880634
<NAME>         HYMEDIX, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
<CURRENCY>     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  286,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    147,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               563,163
<PP&E>                                         250,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 240,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 643,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,850,240
<BONDS>                                      1,065,126
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,572
<COMMON>                                         5,713
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,243,117)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   643,408
<SALES>                                        480,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,039
<CGS>                                          129,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  525,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 1, 11/2013



### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 6/11/2014 Sample Number: 141991-001 Date Collected:06/03/2014 08:59 Date Received:6/3/2014 

### Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 2.0 1 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 0.4 06/08/2014 

### Sample Number: 141991-002 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 08:59 Date Received:6/3/2014 

### FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 59.9 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 06/08/2014 

### Sample Number: 141991-003 Date Collected:06/03/2014 09:14 Date Received:6/3/2014 

### WWTP Outlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 32.1 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 06/10/2014 

### Sample Number: 141991-004 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 09:17 Date Received:6/3/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 35.2 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 06/10/2014 

### Sample Number: 141991-005 Date Collected:06/03/2014 09:19 Date Received:6/3/2014 

## Secondary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 29.2 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 06/10/2014 

### Sample Number: 141991-006 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 09:37 Date Received:6/3/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 71.7 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 06/10/2014 

### Sample Number: 141991-007 Date Collected:06/03/2014 09:37 Date Received:6/3/2014 

## Primary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 76.2 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 06/10/2014 Amos Plant, 141991 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 6/11/2014 Sample Number: 141991-008 Date Collected:06/03/2014 09:43 Date Received:6/3/2014 

### WWTP Inlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 190000 10000 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 4000 06/08/2014

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Amos Plant, 141991 Page 2 of 2
2:17-cv-936

: Sargus Magistrate Judge: Jolson

Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 1 of 28 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 2 of 28 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 3 of 28 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 4 of 28 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 5 of 28 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 6 of 28 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 7 of 28 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 8 of 28 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 9 of 28 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 10 of 28 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 11 of 28 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 12 of 28 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 13 of 28 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 14 of 28 PAGEID #: 14
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 15 of 28 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 16 of 28 PAGEID #: 16
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 17 of 28 PAGEID #: 17
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 18 of 28 PAGEID #: 18
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 19 of 28 PAGEID #: 19
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 20 of 28 PAGEID #: 20
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 21 of 28 PAGEID #: 21
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 22 of 28 PAGEID #: 22
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 23 of 28 PAGEID #: 23
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 24 of 28 PAGEID #: 24
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 25 of 28 PAGEID #: 25
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 26 of 28 PAGEID #: 26
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 27 of 28 PAGEID #: 27
Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/24/17 Page: 28 of 28 PAGEID #: 28
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SALVADOR GARCIA,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00176-CR

Appeal from the

112th District Court

of Pecos County, Texas 

(TC# 3539)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s fourth request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until November 18, 2019. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WIL BE CONSIDERED

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Corina E. Lozano, Official Court Reporter for the 112th

District Court, for Pecos County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the above styled

and numbered cause and forward the same to this Court on or before November 18, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of October 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A1 24 5 . LAMARCUS LI TTLE v . J OHN J EANES, W ARDEN.

Aft er t h e s u peri o r co u rt d en i ed h i s pet i t i o n fo r wri t o f hab eas co rp u s , Lam arcu s Li t t le fi led an ap peal t o t h i s Co u rt

. Th e Su p rem e Co u rt , h owev er, h as ap p el l a t e ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er al l cas es in vo l v i n g hab eas co rp u s

. See Ga. Co n s t

. 1 98 3 , A rt

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (4 ). Th i s ap p e a l i s t h u s TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p o s i t i on

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/28/2016 March 28, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIH/NIAID 101 Novel Platforms for 
Delivery and/or Expression of HIV Env Immunogens for HIV Vaccines 
(N01).
    Date: January 26, 2022.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G33B, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: John C. Pugh, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National 
Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G33B, Rockville, MD 
20852, (301) 435-2398, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#067673616e6c696e684665757428686f6e28616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f68683919e9c999e98b6958584d8989f9ed8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 27, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-28409 Filed 12-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UN ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

VS. 

WILLIAM aka "NICK " PRIGMORE, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3: 17crl 87 

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE 

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S PRO SE MOTION 

TO EXPEDITE RULING AND SUMMARY .JUDGMENT ON MOTION TO 

CHANGE DETENTION CONDITIONS DUE TO AN EXTENDED AMOUNT 

OF TIME BEING TORTURED (DOC. #205) AND MOTION REQUESTl G 

THIS COURT TO REVIEW ALL PUBLIC RECORDS UNDER DEFE DANT'S 

NAME AND SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER INCLUDING BUT NOT 

LIMITED TO D.Y.S., ODRC, DETMER AND THIS CASE ... PATTERN 

OF TORTURE UNDER . .. DETENTION CONDITIONS (DOC. #206) 

The captioned motions are OVERRULED by this Court due to its lack of jurisdiction 

over a manner pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit or for 

reasons that this Court has no jurisdiction to order the Bureau of Prisons to grant the re lief 

requested. 

July 6, 2021 WALTER I-1. RICE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDG E 

Copies to: 

Counsel of record 

William Prigmore #77153-061 , Federal Correctional Institution P.O. Box 33, Terre Haute, 

Indiana 47808
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-51190

Summary Calendar

 

In the Matter Of: ROUNDVILLE PARTNERS L L C,

Debtor

ROUNDVILLE PARTNERS L L C,

Appellant,

versus

STEPHEN M JONES; FRANKIE SUE

JONES, 

Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(A-99-CV-617)

 

May 29, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roundville appeals the district court’s affirmance of the

bankruptcy court’s denial of relief under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1)(B).

This suit arose out of a contract gone sour in which the Joneses

were to sell five lots of property to Roundville. Initially, the

parties planned to conduct the sale through a single contract.

Later, the Joneses requested that the contract be executed in two

stages for tax purposes, selling some property first and the rest
2

of the lots in a second contract. Because of zoning requirements,

the two stages ended up with lopsided value: Roundville was to pay

more for the first-stage contract than that property was worth and

less under the second-stage contract than that property was worth.

The total price, however, was equivalent to the amount specified in

the original contract. 

When the Joneses refused to execute the second stage,

Roundville was left having paid more for the first stage property

than it was worth considered on its own. Roundville took two steps

in response. It filed a state court action seeking specific

performance of the second-stage contract. After filing Chapter 11

proceedings, it also filed an adversary proceeding for fraudulent

transfer in the bankruptcy court under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1)(B). 

The bankruptcy court held that Roundville either was not made

insolvent by or had received equivalent value for the Contract 2

closing because it became the beneficial owner of Contract 3. The

court reasoned that Contract 3 had value despite the Joneses’

refusal to close because of Roundville’s state court cause of

action. The district court affirmed, and Roundville appealed.

Having reviewed the pleadings and bankruptcy court’s opinion

in this matter, we are persuaded that there was no clear error in

the bankruptcy court’s determination. In light of the value of

Contract 3, Roundville cannot satisfy the requirements of § 548.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4543 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4543

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, as the ``Anthony J. Cortese 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ANTHONY J. CORTESE POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Anthony J. Cortese Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Anthony J. 
Cortese Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JOHN ANTHONY COOPER, : 

 : Case No. 2:18-CV-34 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 v. : 

 : Magistrate Judge Vascura 

BRENDA WAMSLEY, et al., : 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

ORDER 

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s March 12, 2018, Report 

and Recommendation (ECF No. 4), which recommended that the claims against John and Jane 

Doe Defendants be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A for failure to state a claim. 

The parties have failed to file any objections, and the deadline for objections (February 

26, 2018) has lapsed. 

 The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on an independent 

consideration of the analysis therein. The claims against John and Jane Doe Defendants are 

hereby DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

 ALGENON L. MARBLEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATED: March 13, 2018
# k>L^—^'^ 7 k^-f^-^ ^ u >

:•'. ! ' ; Q ".! •

kiKi'M M I 1 (t\l^lrss|l) ^ i M : I n ' \

.'. I • •••.-• •1 1 I L1 •.• •• ; t • . •I I •• . > r1', . . 1 ,'•' , •' \

• > ••• . M I'\M 1 I \

M nsf.crDli . \IKI'i)i U ^ 1 t' s \r. rI t 

## \pntJ6 . :()l i

M rDfiini s l)cV;uiy . Cliic tl^ssoniia l Ai rSorvicL-^ ^ Divi'^ioi i OtiK vot"A viiilii> n Analysi s ('.S . Dcpannicn l o t rraiis[it»rt;ilitn i i:()0\o vJerse yA\o . S F Doekc l '•- n<)l-()Sl-:(M)|-IOhX 4 Dea rMr . !X-Van\ ; W e ar ci n reccip i n tth e IA S propovil s Iron i Miilti-Acr o Jh a Ai rC lioic e I )IK- . "scaPor i Airline s niu tMcsjih a Avialitm , Inc. . ottering ; f'uiur e >er'^ ie cl o an d fro m ih e Maso n tii y Airport . Mle rrevieuin.i i UK'SL ' pn^posriK . ih c(.'oiiimi-,siii n Liiianinioiisl yclios o t o .^rij-^pm i ili c Mcsah a proposal . MulliAero' s pr(>p*>.sa l note d a i picseii l ilie ypo-iSL-^ s ni ^ airer.il t t o aL-c<MntM(Kial e lliei rproposal . SeaPor l \irlitie"- . pnnx>Mi l olTer s th e nine-sea i Pilaiu s P(' - I Z aircral tv\liie h tItK' s no t tiK'c i tui rservic e guarantee , s o Mesah a Aviiiin>[r.- , rise-inoni h ^^pIio n olk'fint ! 1 4 non-slo p rounv. i trip s jie r'v\ee k l o Minneapoli s wis h ih e .~^4-^e.i i Saa h .M O aircraf l uil h th e inos fctmipeliliv e subsid ywa s sejeeted . i h e Maso n (..it yAiipo n ( ntnniissio n an d stal l uru e \oi i t o suppor t awardini : ou rI.A S eontrnc tt o Mesab a Aviation . Ine . lk> l Regards . .lon i Dun n M ( A V(•ouirnissio n Chai r