alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Acorn Energy, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael
      Barth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------








**/** s **/** Michael
      Barth


Michael
      Barth


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      14, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Form 10-Q/A of Microtune, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rob-Roy J. Graham, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/    ROB-ROY J.
GRAHAM                 
|Rob-Roy J. Graham Chief Financial Officer



Date:
April 29, 2004
I OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

QROVLR SLLLCRS 

Awon”r* QVNUN. 

county Attarnel, 

Titu8 County 

Mt. Pleamant, Torta 

Dear Nr* 7anOel OplnfOn X0. O-7360 

Bet sbutdorn 0 

newcrpsper to lnsta 

Your request for an op 

nttor is as' follower 

*I hami'pour opinion 

the other opinion l(O* O-7 

lag (LO regarding the iume 

ed your opin 

that oertain 

aooiden t , oa 

a break as t 

la&al public 

le aonfuenot be euoh 

aam0 Contpan~ 

down entiretall 8 new 

e cause enou@ 

ati be elito publioh logal noticea or 50 

Ion a OLBO in whlob a fast ismae 

e opinion bi tbie department that your 

should bo anewered to the &feat that 

mob ehutdoua for one week, in order to install a ner preen, 

Would not render the paper ineligible thdreatter to publish 

local notloea under the law. 

You have oormotly quoted our holdinn In Opinion 

lo. 0-7286, that a break in publloatlm on l ooount ol aooident., 

aamaltr, and the like, would not omstltute auob a 'break 80 to 
,. 

* i 580 

nonorablo t. V. Vauoe - pago 0 

ywndrr a paper InelIgible to l ooept leEa publloationeWe tbfnk tho typo of caum ior the Sailtare to put 

out en imoue of a neuepaper mentioned by you la a oaaual ty,. 

Iebmter’o new International Dlotlonary thus definer tbe word 

'cRRur3ty~I "1. Cbanoet aocidsaf$ omtinpmoy; al 80 that 

rhjch hapeenn without design , or’ without heina foraaeen; en 

roc~llent. Tblo 10 the sense of the word l camualtf fn which 

ve used It in our opinion. Certainly, tbe ne0eselty for dlooardlng a prom and installing a new one in a newspaper printlnu oif’loe 2s not an act of dealt, but arimea from a ocntlngeng, that 10. the ln8Uequre~ or uniltneer of tbe proem $xetifylna ita roplaoeunent~ 

.Tbe lord goa,maalt~ le of broader l l&tiaanoe thu! 

the rord gaoaidentv; tbae a destruotlon of e press Erllgbtnln# would not be an l coldent~ but It undoubtedly would 66 a 

oamual tf. Xoreover, If the press were blom up b7 an hoindiary*m bomb, it would not be an aoc$bmt~ but would be a 

caaralty oi the flrat ran&* Our 1 anpage quoted by pm -- 

vacolaentl and oaeualty~ or the like , ma8 stem broaQer,ln 

lta scope than el tber or both or the word* l aocldent~ and 

l eamaltyo. It w uld 

trm Jailer s 

lnolnde other delryr or interruptlone 

otus s ior 8 break in pub1 ication. 

Xoreoter. tbe rule We h a r e lnnounceff lm not lImIted 

to those accident and camualty attu8tionnr which create sn absolute neoeasfty for interruption, but on the ocntrary, would 

lnolode tboso rltuatione where the exl~enolea ot .tbe buslneam 

reyuired better tacilltlea an6 service, or laok of publication 

was dne to labor troubler, shortage of paperr and the like, or 

humanitarian ~onrideratlonm~ suob as obaeming the Cbrletnme 

and Wew Year’* holiday@, *fled tbe.order - .tlmo ott".'~~ 

‘~ ,‘.: ~. 

r,’ ATTORNEY OEMERAL OP TEM8 

/ 

4 ,d 0012-6: . ----, deer*, 

AaSISTAWT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

LAMONT WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-341
vs.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMON, District Judge Walter H. Rice
PLEAS COURT DOMESTIC RELATIONS Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

DIVISION, ET AL,

Defendants

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Michael
J. Newman (Doce. #5), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting
that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly,

this case is hereby DISMISSED and is CLOSED on the Court’s docket.

(be ow

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: __/1-20 -17
EXHIBIT 4.3.2

 

Certificate of Secretary

 

I, PETER POUNDS, the duly elected and acting Secretary of General Communication, Inc., an Alaska corporation (“Company”), do hereby certify and declare that the resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors contained in the minutes of its meeting attached hereto as Exhibit 4.3.2A is a true and correct copy of that resolution as contained in those minutes duly adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors at its meeting held on April 26, 2013.

 

Executed as of this 26th day of April 2013 at Anchorage, Alaska.

 

	
 
    	
GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Peter Pounds
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
     Peter Pounds,   Secretary
    


 











 

EXHIBIT 4.3.2A

 

Excerpt from Minutes of Action by the

Board of Directors of General Communication, Inc.

April 26, 2013

 

RESOLVED, that the board of directors of General Communication, Inc. (“Company”) authorizes increasing the allocation of common stock to the Company’s GCI 401(k) Plan by 5 million shares of Company Class A common stock (“Plan Stock”);

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Board approves filing a registration statement pursuant to the federal Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”) and, in particular, in the format of Form S-8, where such registration statement will pertain specifically to the registration of the offer of the Plan Stock and such Plan Stock will be offered or acquired through the Plan; and

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the president and other officers of the Company are directed to take such steps as are necessary to register the offer of the Plan Stock and otherwise to be in compliance with the Securities Act and other securities laws.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4077 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4077

    To amend title 49, United States Code, to make it an unfair or 
deceptive practice for any air carrier, foreign air carrier, or ticket 
   agent to charge a fee for or accept payment from a passenger on a 
         flight segment for the first piece of checked baggage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2009

  Mr. Maffei introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 49, United States Code, to make it an unfair or 
deceptive practice for any air carrier, foreign air carrier, or ticket 
   agent to charge a fee for or accept payment from a passenger on a 
         flight segment for the first piece of checked baggage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The First Bag Flies Free Act''.

SEC. 2. UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE PRACTICE.

    (a) No Cost for First Piece of Checked Baggage.--Section 41712 of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(c) No Cost for First Piece of Checked Baggage.--It shall be an 
unfair or deceptive practice under subsection (a) for any air carrier, 
foreign air carrier, or ticket agent to charge a fee for or accept 
payment from a passenger on a flight segment for the first piece of 
checked baggage that weighs 50 pounds or less and for which the size 
does not exceed 62 inches (determined by adding the length, width, and 
height together).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The requirements of section 41712 of title 49, 
United States Code, shall become effective on December 15, 2009, or on 
the date of enactment of this Act, whichever is later.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
           [OAKERSON, ARNOLD, WALKER & CO. LETTERHEAD APPEARS HERE]


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         TO INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
                         -----------------------------


The Board of Directors
L&B Financial, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 
333-2574) on Form S-8 of L&B Financial, Inc., of our report dated August 14, 
1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of L&B Financial, Inc., and 
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated 
statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended June 30, 1996, which report appears in the
June 30, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of L&B Financial, Inc.


                                        /s/ Oakerson, Arnold, Walker & Co.
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Oakerson, Arnold, Walker & Co.

Mt. Pleasant, Texas
September 26, 1996
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

Case No. 3:17CR00206

Plaintiff, :

 vs. : District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

SAID HERNANDEZ-RAMOS, :

Defendant. :

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This case came on for hearing on January 26, 2019. The United States was

represented by Assistant United States Attorney Sheila Lafferty and Defendant was

represented by Mr. Leo Patrick Mulligan.

The parties have entered into a plea agreement which has been filed of record. The

undersigned carefully inquired of Defendant regarding his understanding of the

agreement as well as his competence to understand the agreement. Having fully inquired,

the undersigned Judicial Officer finds that Defendant’s tendered plea of guilty to Count 1

of the Information is knowing, intelligent and voluntary. Based on the statement of facts

as set forth in the plea colloquy the undersigned finds that there is a sufficient factual

basis for a finding of guilt as to the count.

It is accordingly recommended that the Court accept the plea of guilty to Count 1
of the Information and find Defendant guilty as charged in such Counts of Conspiracy to

Knowingly and Intentionally Possess with intent to Distribute Heroin in violation of Title

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)&(b)(1)© all in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §846.

Pending the Court’s acceptance of Defendant’s pleas, Defendant has been referred

to the Probation Department for a pre-sentence investigation.

January 30, 2018 s/ Sharon L. Ovington 

 Sharon L. Ovington

 United States Magistrate Judge
NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b), any party may serve and file specific, written

objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within FOURTEEN days after

being served with this Report and Recommendations. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 49(c)

and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days because this

Report is being served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P.

5(b)(2)(C), (D), (E), or (F). Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report

objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the

objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters

occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the

transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the

Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A

party may respond to another party’s objections within FOURTEEN days after being

served with a copy thereof. 

Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on

appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947,

949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Exhibit 10.9

 

Additional agreement to the Commercial Lease

 

	
Beween
    	
IBM Immobilien GbR
    
	
 
    	
Zur Rollers-Au 4
    
	
 
    	
94244 Teisnach /   Kaikenried, Germany
    
	
 
    	
- hereinafter called   the Landlord -
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
and
    	
congatec AG
    
	
 
    	
Auwiesenstrasse 5
    
	
 
    	
94469 Deggendorf,   Germany
    
	
 
    	
- hereinafter called   the Tenant -
    


 

the following agreement is made:

 

In addition to the Commercial Lease dated 12/31/2004, an additional 51 m2 of office space shall be rented from 1/1/2009 in the office building at Auwiesenstr. 5, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany.

 

The monthly rental payment amounts to €6.00 per square meter plus the current VAT, currently 19%.

 

The monthly advance payment for additional property expenses is determined to be € 800.- plus VAT from 01/01/2009.

 

Apart from that, the provisions of the Commercial Lease dated 12/31/2004 shall apply.

 

	
Deggendorf, 1/20/2009
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Heinz Iglhaut
    	
 
    	
/s/ Gerhard Edi
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
IM Immobilien GbR
    	
 
    	
congatec AG
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
- Landlord – Heinz Iglhaut
    	
 
    	
Tenant – Gerhard Edi
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                List of Subsidiaries of Spieker Properties, L.P.

1.      Spieker Washington Interest Partners, a California general partnership

2.      Fremont Bayside Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership

3.      Spieker Partners-Livermore Ltd., a California limited partnership

4.      Spieker Properties #172, Limited Partnership, a California limited
        partnership

5.      Spieker Properties #221 Partners, Limited Partnership, a California
        general partnership

6.      Spieker Properties #178, Limited Partnership, a California limited
        partnership

7.      Spieker Properties #166, Limited Partnership, a California limited
        partnership

8.      Spieker Properties #177, Limited Partnership, a California limited
        partnership

9.      Spieker Properties #237, Partners, a California general partnership

10.     Spieker Properties #122, Limited Partnership, a California limited
        partnership

11.     Spieker Properties #219, Partners, a California general partnership

12.     Spieker Properties #185, Limited Partnership, a California limited
        partnership

13.     Spieker Properties #183, Limited Partnership, a California limited
        partnership

14.     Spieker Properties #144, Limited Partnership, a Texas limited
        partnership

15.     Spieker Properties #179, Limited Partnership, a California limited
        partnership

16.     Spieker Properties #238, Partners, a California general partnership

17.     Spieker Singleton #154, a California limited partnership

18.     Sand Hill Northwest Properties, L.L.C.

19.     San Mateo Office Limited, a California limited partnership

20.     S.S. Livermore L.P., a California limited partnership
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 0 9

- 2 0 7 7 9 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

J O S E L U I S R O D R I G U E Z M A R T I N E Z
, a l s o k n o w n a s J o s e L u i s R o d r i g u e z , a l s o k n o w n a s J o s e L u i s R o d r i g u e z

- M a r t i n e z ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 4 : 0 9

- C R

- 3 3 9

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H
, D E N N I S
, a n d C L E M E N T
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

J o s e L u i s R o d r i g u e z M a r t i n e z ( R o d r i g u e z ) a p p e a l s t h e s e n t e n c e i m p o s e d

f o l l o w i n g h i s c o n v i c t i o n f o r i l l e g a l r e e n t r y a f t e r d e p o r t a t i o n u n d e r 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 3 2 6

. R o d r i g u e z c o n t e n d s t h a t t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t e r r e d b y i m p o s i n g a 1 6

- l e v e l

c r i m e o f v i o l e n c e e n h a n c e m e n t b a s e d o n h i s p r i o r T e x a s c o n v i c t i o n f o r s e x u a l

a s s a u l t o f a c h i l d
, w h i c h i s a v i o l a t i o n o f T e x a s P e n a l C o d e § 2 2

. 0 1 1 ( a ) ( 2 )

. H e

a r g u e s t h a t t h i s c o n v i c t i o n d o e s n o t c o n s t i t u t e t h e e n u m e r a t e d o f f e n s e o f s e x u a l U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 26 , 20 10

Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5
, the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-20779 Document: 00511274433 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010N o

. 0 9

- 2 0 7 7 9

a b u s e o f a m i n o r o r s t a t u t o r y r a p e u n d e r t h e G u i d e l i n e s b e c a u s e a n o f f e n s e

u n d e r § 2 2

. 0 1 1 c a n b e c o m m i t t e d a g a i n s t a v i c t i m w h o i s o n l y 1 6 y e a r s o f a g e

. R o d r i g u e z c o n c e d e s t h a t h i s a r g u m e n t i s f o r e c l o s e d a n d m o v e s f o r s u m m a r y

a f f i r m a n c e t o p r e s e r v e t h e i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A s R o d r i g u e z c o n c e d e s , h i s a r g u m e n t i s f o r e c l o s e d b y U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. C a s t r o

- G u e v a r r a , 5 7 5 F

. 3 d 5 5 0 ( 5 t h C i r

. )
, c e r t

. d e n i e d
, 1 3 0 S

. C t

. 6 4 9 ( 2 0 0 9 )

. A c c o r d i n g l y , h i s m o t i o n f o r s u m m a r y a f

f i r m a n c e i s G R A N T E D a n d t h e j u d g m e n t

o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s A F F I R M E D

.

2 Case: 09-20779 Document: 00511274433 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephen Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Embarcadero
Technologies, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant s internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the
registrant s internal control over financial reporting; and



5.
The registrant s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant s auditors and the audit committee of registrant s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant s internal control over financial reporting.



January 18, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen Wong                     
|Stephen Wong                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer