6758 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

local, tribal, or territorial government 

traveling abroad to carry out official 

duties in support of the U.S. 

government. 

DATES: Effective February 9, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alice Kottmyer, Attorney-Adviser, 

kottmyeram@state.gov, 202–647–2318. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

was published as an interim rule on 

May 15, 2015 (80 FR 27856), with a 60- 

day period for public comments. No 

public comments were received. 

As explained in the interim final rule, 

22 CFR 51.3(b) provides that an ‘‘official 

passport’’ may be issued to: An official 

or employee of the U.S. government 

traveling abroad to carry out official 

duties; spouses and family members of 

such persons; and, when authorized by 

the Department of State, U.S. 

government contractors traveling abroad 

to carry out official duties on behalf of 

the U.S. government. 

Increasingly, the federal government 

utilizes officials or employees of state, 

local, tribal, and territorial governments 

in support of federal activities, both 

domestically and overseas, such as the 

Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Joint 

Terrorism Task Force. When required to 

travel internationally in support of such 

federal activities, these individuals are 

not currently eligible for official 

passports. Issuance of an official 

passport to such individuals signifies to 

foreign governments that they are 

carrying out official duties in support of 

the U.S. government. The activities 

undertaken by these officials are often of 

pressing national security, law 

enforcement, or humanitarian 

importance and occur with little 

advance notice. It is in the U.S. 

government’s interest to provide these 

individuals the travel documents 

necessary to allow them to travel in a 

timely manner. 

Under 22 U.S.C. 211a et seq., the 

Secretary of State has the authority to 

make rules for the granting and issuance 

of passports. The Department is 

amending section 51.3(b) of 22 CFR to 

authorize issuing official passports to an 

official or employee of a state, local, 

tribal, or territorial government traveling 

abroad to carry out official duties in 

support of the U.S. government. 

Regulatory Findings 

The Regulatory Findings included in 

the interim final rule are incorporated 

herein. 

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 51 

Passports. 

Accordingly, the interim rule 

amending 22 CFR part 51 which was 

published at 80 FR 27857 on May 15, 

2015, is adopted as a final rule without 

change. 

Patrick F. Kennedy, 

Under Secretary for Management. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02576 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2016–0090] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

Youngs Bay, Astoria, OR 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of deviation from 

drawbridge regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a 

temporary deviation from the operating 

schedule that governs the Oregon State 

highway bridge across Youngs Bay foot 

of Fifth Street, mile 2.4, at Astoria, OR. 

The common name of this bridge is Old 

Youngs Bay Bridge. The deviation is 

necessary to accommodate extensive 

maintenance and restoration efforts on 

this bridge. This deviation allows the 

double bascule span to operate in a 

single leaf mode when at least a threehour advance notification is given by 

marine vessels that require an opening, 

and the vertical clearance of the bridge 

to be reduced. 

DATES: This deviation is effective from 

7 a.m. on February 15, 2016 to 11 p.m. 

on June 15, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this 

deviation, [USCG–2016–0090] is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Type the docket number in the 

‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ 

Click on Open Docket Folder on the line 

associated with this deviation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this temporary 

deviation, call or email Steven M. 

Fischer, Thirteenth Coast Guard District 

Bridge Program Administrator, 

telephone 206–220–7282, email d13-pfd13bridges@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Oregon Department of Transportation 

(ODOT) requested to reduce the vertical 

clearance of the Old Youngs Bay Bridge, 

mile 2.4, across Youngs Bay foot of Fifth 

Street at Astoria, OR, and to open half 

of the draw span when at least a threehour notice is given to the bridge 

operator by vessels wishing to pass. The 

requested period of deviation is from 7 

a.m. on February 15, 2016 to 11 p.m. on 

June 15, 2016. The deviation is 

necessary to accommodate extensive 

maintenance and restoration efforts on 

this bridge. The Old Youngs Bay Bridge 

provides a vertical clearance 

approximately 19 feet above mean high 

water when in the closed-to-navigation 

position. The double bascule span of the 

bridge will have a containment system 

installed which will reduce the vertical 

clearance by 5 feet from 19 feet above 

mean high water to 14 feet above mean 

high water. The normal operating 

schedule can be found in 33 CFR 

117.899(b). The deviation allows the 

double bascule span of the Old Youngs 

Bay Bridge to operate single leaf when 

at least three-hours of notice are given 

by mariners requiring an opening during 

the deviation period. Waterway usage 

on Youngs Bay is primarily small 

recreational boaters and fishing vessels. 

Vessels able to pass through the 

bridge in the closed positions may do so 

at any time. The bridge will be able to 

open for emergencies if a three-hour 

notice is given to the bridge operator, 

and there is no immediate alternate 

route for vessels to pass. The Coast 

Guard will also inform the users of the 

waterways through our Local and 

Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the 

change in operating schedule for the 

bridge so that vessels can arrange their 

transits to minimize any impact caused 

by the temporary deviation. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. This deviation 

from the operating regulations is 

authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: February 3, 2016. 

Steven M. Fischer, 

Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard 

District. 

[FR Doc. 2016–02486 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0784, FRL–9940–19– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Santa Barbara 

County Air Pollution Control District; 

Permit Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 6759 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve revisions to the Santa 

Barbara County Air Pollution Control 

District (SBCAPCD or District) portion 

of the California State Implementation 

Plan (SIP). These revisions concern 

administrative and procedural 

requirements to obtain preconstruction 

permits which regulate emission 

sources under the Clean Air Act as 

amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: This rule is effective on April 11, 

2016 without further notice, unless the 

EPA receives adverse comments by 

March 10, 2016. If we receive such 

comments, we will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register to 

notify the public that this direct final 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number [EPA–R09– 

OAR–2015–0784, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: R9airpermits@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air3), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: YaTing (Sheila) Tsai, EPA Region IX, (415) 

972–3328, Tsai.Ya-Ting@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rules did the State submit? 

B. Are there other versions of these rules? 

C. What are the purposes of the submitted 

rules? 

II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? 

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation 

criteria? 

C. Public Comment and Final Action 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rules did the State submit? 

Table 1 lists the rules addressed by 

this proposal with the dates that they 

were adopted or revised by the 

SBCAPCD and submitted by the 

California Air Resources Board (CARB). 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES

Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted/ 

revised Submitted 

SBCAPCD ......... 201 Permits Required ......................................................................................... 06/19/2008 10/20/2008 

SBCAPCD ......... 203 Transfer ........................................................................................................ 04/17/1997 03/10/1998 

SBCAPCD ......... 204 Applications .................................................................................................. 04/17/1997 03/10/1998 

SBCAPCD ......... 206 Conditional Approval of Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate ......... 10/15/1991 01/28/1992 

On November 18, 2008, the EPA 

determined that the submittal for 

SBCAPCD Rule 201 met the 

completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, 

appendix V, which must be met before 

formal EPA review. On May 21, 1998, 

the submittals of Rules 203 and 204 

were found to meet the completeness 

criteria. On April 28, 1992, the 

submittal for Rule 206 was found to 

meet the completeness criteria. 

B. Are there other versions of these 

rules? 

Table 2 lists the dates of the SIP 

approved versions of Rules 201, 203 and 

206. There is no previous version of 

Rule 204 approved in the SIP, although 

the SBCAPCD adopted and revised an 

earlier version of this rule on April 17, 

1997, and CARB submitted it to us on 

March 10, 1998. We approved an earlier 

version of Rule 201 into the SIP on May 

5, 1982. The SBCAPCD adopted 

revisions to the SIP-approved version on 

April 17, 1997 and CARB submitted it 

to us on March 10, 1998. While we can 

act on only the most recently submitted 

version, we have reviewed materials 

provided with previous submittals. 

TABLE 2—SIP APPROVED RULES

Local agency Rule No. Rule title SIP approval 

date 

Federal 

Register 

citation 

SBCAPCD ......... 201 Permits Required ......................................................................................... 05/05/1982 47 FR 19330 

SBCAPCD ......... 203 Transfer ........................................................................................................ 05/18/1981 46 FR 27116 

SBCAPCD ......... 206 Conditional Approval of Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate ......... 05/18/1981 46 FR 27116 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

6760 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

C. What are the purposes of the 

submitted rules? 

Section 110(a) of the CAA requires 

States to submit regulations that will 

assure attainment and maintenance of 

the National Ambient Quality Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS). These 

rules were developed as part of the local 

agency’s general programmatic 

requirement to implement the 

requirement commonly referred to as 

the minor or general New Source 

Review (NSR) program. The revisions 

made by the submitted rules listed in 

Table 1 are mostly administrative in 

nature. New Rule 204 lists information 

required to apply for an Authority to 

Construct (ATC) or a Permit to Operate 

(PTO). Rule 201 has been reformatted 

for clarity. Several additions were also 

made to add provisions related to state 

law. Rules 203 and 206 have been 

reformatted with minor revisions for 

clarity. There are no substantive 

changes to these rules. 

The TSD has more information about 

these rules. 

II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? 

SIP rules must be enforceable (see 

CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not 

interfere with applicable requirements 

concerning attainment and reasonable 

further progress or other CAA 

requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), 

and must not modify certain SIP control 

requirements in nonattainment areas 

without ensuring equivalent or greater 

emissions reductions (see CAA section 

193). The submitted rules, except Rule 

204, are revisions to existing SIP 

approved general NSR permit program 

requirements under 40 CFR 51.160– 

51.164. The revisions are primarily 

administrative in nature (reformatting, 

provide additional clarity), but we also 

discuss the rules or portions of each 

rule, that serve to satisfy any of these 

general permit program requirements. 

Rule 204 contains requirements for ATC 

and PTO applications improving the 

clarity of the general NSR permit 

program. 

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation 

criteria? 

These rules are consistent with CAA 

requirements and relevant guidance 

regarding enforceability and SIP 

revisions. These changes are mostly 

administrative in nature and their 

approval will not interfere with any 

applicable requirement concerning 

attainment and reasonable further 

progress, or any other CAA applicable 

requirement. 

The TSD has more information on our 

evaluation. 

C. Public Comment and Final Action 

As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of 

the Act, the EPA is fully approving the 

submitted rules because we believe they 

fulfill all relevant requirements. We do 

not think anyone will object to this 

approval, so we are finalizing it without 

proposing it in advance. However, in 

the Proposed Rules section of this 

Federal Register, we are simultaneously 

proposing approval of the same 

submitted rules. If we receive adverse 

comments by March 10, 2016, we will 

publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register to notify the public 

that the direct final approval will not 

take effect and we will address the 

comments in a subsequent final action 

based on the proposal. If we do not 

receive timely adverse comments, the 

direct final approval will be effective 

without further notice on April 11, 

2016. This action will incorporate these 

rules into the federally enforceable SIP. 

Please note that if the EPA receives 

adverse comment on an amendment, 

paragraph, or section of this rule and if 

that provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, the EPA may 

adopt as final those provisions of the 

rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is finalizing the 

incorporation by reference of the 

SBCAPCD rules described in the 

amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 

below. The EPA has made, and will 

continue to make, these documents 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 

at the appropriate EPA office (see the 

ADDRESSES section of this preamble for 

more information). 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, the EPA’s role is to 

approve state choices, provided that 

they meet the criteria of the Clean Air 

Act. Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where the EPA or 

an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 6761 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by April 11, 2016. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the Proposed Rules section 

of this Federal Register, rather than file 

an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

the EPA can withdraw this direct final 

rule and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: December 3, 2015. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by 

adding paragraphs (c)(51)(xiii)(E), (F), 

and (G), (c)(187)(i)(E), (c)(254)(i)(C)(6) 

and (7), and (c)(361)(i)(A)(4) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(51) * * * 

(xiii) * * * 

(E) Previously approved on May 18, 

1981 in paragraph (c)(51)(xiii)(A) of this 

section and now deleted with 

replacement in paragraph 

(c)(187)(i)(E)(1) of this section, Rule 206. 

(F) Previously approved on May 18, 

1981 in paragraph (c)(51)(xiii)(A) of this 

section and now deleted with 

replacement in paragraph (c)(254)(i)(C) 

of this section, Rules 203 and 204. 

(G) Previously approved on May 18, 

1981 in paragraph (c)(51)(xiii)(A) of this 

section and now deleted with 

replacement in paragraph 

(c)(361)(i)(A)(4) of this section, Rule 

201. 

* * * * * 

(187) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(E) Santa Barbara County Air 

Pollution Control District. 

(1) Rule 206, ‘‘Conditional Approval 

of Authority to Construct or Permit to 

Operate,’’ Revised October 15, 1991. 

* * * * * 

(254) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) * * * 

(6) Rule 203, ‘‘Transfer,’’ revised April 

17, 1997. 

(7) Rule 204, ‘‘Applications,’’ revised 

April 17, 1997. 

* * * * * 

(361) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(A) * * * 

(4) Rule 201, ‘‘Permits Required,’’ 

revised June 19, 2008. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2016–02417 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0715; FRL–9941–16– 

Region 9] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; California; San 

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution 

Control District; Employer Based Trip 

Reduction Programs 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a regulation 

submitted for incorporation into the San 

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution 

Control District (SJVUAPCD or District) 

portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). The 

regulation, Rule 9410 (Employer Based 

Trip Reduction), establishes 

requirements for employers in the San 

Joaquin Valley to implement programs 

encouraging employees to use 

ridesharing and alternative 

transportation methods to reduce air 

pollution. The effect of this action is to 

make the requirements of Rule 9410 

federally enforceable as part of the 

California SIP. 

DATES: This rule will be effective on 

March 10, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established 

docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2014– 

0715 for this action. Generally, 

documents in the docket for this action 

are available electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California 94105–3901. 

While all documents in the docket are 

listed at http://www.regulations.gov, 

some information may be publicly 

available only at the hard copy location 

(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, 

multi-volume reports), and some may 

not be available in either location (e.g., 

confidential business information 

(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 

4152, buss.jeffrey@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On August 24, 2015 at 80 FR 51153, 

the EPA proposed to approve the 

following rule into the California SIP. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES