alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,135,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  626,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,799,968
<PP&E>                                         847,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,064,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          570,747
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,539
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,379,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,064,854
<SALES>                                        481,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               481,769
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  197,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,141,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (856,735)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (856,735)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (856,735)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-152576, 333-127354, 333-107988, 333-101828, 333-74610, 333-49350, 333-52598, 333-59843, 333-37111, and 333-20225) of Zoran Corporation of our report dated February 26, 2009 relatingto the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

SanJose, California 

February 26, 2009
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0429

_____________________________

LARRY E. JAKES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Ronald W. Flury, Judge.

June 7, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,
vs. Case No. 3:17cr187
WILLIAM PRIGMORE, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
Defendant.

ENTRY ALLOWING ATTORNEY VISIT AT MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL

Although Defendant is represented by attorney Jeff McQuiston, with counsel’s approval

and that of the Court, Mr. Daniel J. O’Brien, attorney at law, is authorized to visit the captioned

Uri

Defendant at the Montgomery County Jail.

December 22, 2017 WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of record
Daniel J. O’Brien, Esq.
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 1 of 11 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 2 of 11 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 3 of 11 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 4 of 11 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 5 of 11 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 6 of 11 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 7 of 11 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 8 of 11 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 9 of 11 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 10 of 11 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 1:17-cv-00746-WOB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/06/17 Page: 11 of 11 PAGEID #: 11
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 0911 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 -NM - 248 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q of American Community Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Randy P. Helton                  
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Randy P. Helton                      
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
David R. Spivey Request for Part 333 Exemption

Exhibit 4

– Q500 Typhoon Ground Station Specifications
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TIMOTHY FONSECA

Appellant

,

v

.

THE ST ATE OF TEXAS

,

Sta te

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 227

- C R

Appeal from the

243 rd District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20180D02567 )

O RDER

The Court has received a supplemental clerk's record containing the trial court's

certification of the defendant's right to appeal. The certification form contains two options that

have both been check marked. The first check marked option states that the case "is not a plea

bargain case, and the defendant has the right of appeal." The second check marked option states

that the case "is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." (emphasis in

original)

It appears the trial court may have inadvertently check marked two separate contradictory

boxes on the certification form. Even though th e mark may have been an inadvertent one, the

certificate is defective because it is ambiguous. Accordingly, the trial court is ordered to execute a

new certification reflecting Appellant's right to appeal. It is not necessary for Appellant to sign the

new certification. The trial court clerk shall prepare a supplemental clerk's record containing the

certification and file it with this Court no later than 14 days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30 th day of October

, 201 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CASE NO. 3:17CR201
v. 3 JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
JEREMY SMITH 3 ORDER UNSEALING

INDICTMENT (R.13) FORWARD

Upon motion of the United States, and for the reason that the above captioned defendant
is in custody, the Indictment (R.13) forward in the above captioned case is hereby ordered

unsealed.

DATE: IA- (0°47 bork

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000880634
<NAME> HYMEDIX, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          42,947
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    314,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               569,221
<PP&E>                                         838,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                 788,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 888,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,130,192
<BONDS>                                      1,131,570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,572
<COMMON>                                         5,713
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,277,870)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   888,607
<SALES>                                        267,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               341,318
<CGS>                                          156,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  568,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (310,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (310,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (310,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
FIELDS AIRCRAFT SPARES, INC.
(Formerly Fields Industrial Group, Inc.)
Statement Regarding Computation of Net Income (Loss) per Share

EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 For The Year
                                                     Ended                  For The Year                For The Year
                                                 December 31,              Ended December              Ended December
                                                     1996                     31, 1995                    31, 1994
<S>                                                <C>                        <C>                           <C>
Additional common stock if
preferred convertible option is
exercised:
  25% of common stock
  outstanding at date of
  conversion                                       $ 514,220                  $ 355,625                     $ --

Number of common stock
  outstanding at the
  beginning of the year                            $ 984,352                  $ 944,352                   $ 883,232

Total weighted average
  common stock
  equivalents at the end of
  the year                                        $1,840,543                 $1,312,469                   $ 883,232

Net income (loss)                                 $ (242,000)                $4,547,000                 $(1,337,000)

Primary and fully diluted
  earnings (loss) per share                       $    (.13)                 $     3.47                 $     (1.51)
</TABLE>






                                       74
2023 AFSAM

International Rifle Team Match

RT3160

1 . RT3600 Individual Scores

1057 - 71

BAROST RED TEAM SCORE -V 

STATE/COUNTRY 

1 ) SGT COLGAN, JOHNATHON 265 -14 UK

2 ) SSG CATT, KEVIN 270 -23 UK

3 ) SGT DEVILLE, JIMMY 248 -15 UK

4 ) WO1 DOUGLAS, JAMES 274 -19 UK

2 . RT3600 Individual Scores

1014 - 71

BAROST WHITE TEAM SCORE -V 

STATE/COUNTRY 

1 ) LCPL BURGESS, MARCUS 266 -21 UK

2 ) MAJ PEASLEY, MARK 243 -11 UK

3 ) LCPL FERGUSON, ANDREW 247 -18 UK

4 ) MAJOR ROSIE, LANCE 258 -21 UK

3 . RT3600 Individual Scores

998 - 67

ALL GUARD ALPHA TEAM SCORE -V 

STATE/COUNTRY 

1 ) SGT GOLDADE, TYLER R 250 -18 ND

2 ) SSG FULMER, MICAH N 239 -13 CO

3 ) 1SG CAPPS, JOSEPH A 242 -17 AR

4 ) MSGT WATTERS, NATHAN A 267 -19 AR

4 . RT3600 Individual Scores

997 - 48

US MARINE CORPS TEAM SCORE -V 

STATE/COUNTRY 

1 ) SGT MULLER, SHAUN P 260 -13 VA

2 ) SGT FLEITAS, NICKOLAS 213 - 3

3 ) SSG STEWART, JUDE O 273 -18 VA

4 ) GYSGT RANTON, CHAD W 251 -14 VA

5 . RT3600 Individual Scores

985 - 68

USAR GOLD TEAM SCORE -V 

STATE/COUNTRY 

1 ) MAJ URICK, GRANT M 248 -15 HI

2 ) SFC WILLIS, RICHARD 251 -22 KY

3 ) MAJ CAMPBELL, JESSE D 243 -12 ID

4 ) CPT BROTHERSTON, CURTIS G 243 -19 CO

Saturday, May 6, 2023 Page 1 of 2 Time printed: 17:24:13
6 . RT3600 Individual Scores

931 - 65

ALL GUARD BRAVO TEAM SCORE -V 

STATE/COUNTRY 

1 ) SFC ARCHAMBAULT, MAX 208 -14 VT

2 ) SFC STAATS, JOHN A 203 - 9 AR

3 ) SFC SAGER, DEVIN S 251 -18 CO

4 ) SGT NORCROSS, AUSTIN D 269 -24 CO

7 . RT3600 Individual Scores

769 - 31

COAST GUARD TEAM SCORE -V 

STATE/COUNTRY 

1 ) SFC PHELPS, STEFAN S 237 - 9 VA

2 ) E-5 LUSH, TRAVIS C 162 - 9 VA

3 ) SFC BOLANOS, STEVEN L 154 - 5 CA

4 ) E5 DUERR, DAVID C 216 - 8 CA

8 . RT3600 Individual Scores

764 - 28

NETHERLANDS TEAM SCORE -V 

STATE/COUNTRY 

1 ) PVT DOPPERT, SANTINO 187 - 7 NETHERLANDS

2 ) 1SG BOELLAARD, MAX 176 - 8 NETHERLANDS

3 ) CPL BUSSTRA, MARTIJN 213 - 7 NETHERLANDS

4 ) MAJ WILKEN, ERIK 188 - 6 NETHERLANDS

Saturday, May 6, 2023 Page 2 of 2 Time printed: 17:24:13
Case: 1:18-cv-00027-MRB Doc #: 35 Filed: 07/06/20 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: 407

Case: 1:18-cv-00027-MRB Doc #: 35 Filed: 07/06/20 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: 408
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7850
MILTON QUENTILLA DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EDWARD W. MURRAY, Correction Director; CITY OF NORFOLK, Defendants - Appellees, and DAVID MAPP, Former Sheriff, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-94-519-2) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Milton Quentilla Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Harold Phillip Juren, Deputy City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district cou rt's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Murray , No. CA-94-519-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.4


 


PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


	$CDN
    4,953,160.42	DATE:
    December 31, 2014


 


DUE
DATE: On or before December 31, 2015 unless otherwise extended by the parties.


 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, 2264793 ONTARIO INC. promises to pay to CANADIAN CANNABIS CORP., the sum of $CDN
4,953,160.42, together with interest at 0% per annum on the outstanding balance of the principal sum owing.


 


The
undersigned hereby expressly waives presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest, demand for payment and notice of non-payment.
Notice given to, or security taken from or release of any security or composition or arrangement entered into with any party hereto
shall not prejudice the rights of the holder to proceed against any other party.


 


	 	2264793
    ONTARIO INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Benjamin Ward
	 	 	Benjamin
    Ward, Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4445 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4445

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To amend Public Law 95-232 to repeal a restriction on treating as Indian 
  country certain lands held in trust for Indian pueblos in New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Indian Pueblo Cultural Center 
Clarification Act''.
SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION ON TREATING AS INDIAN COUNTRY CERTAIN 
LANDS HELD IN TRUST FOR INDIAN PUEBLOS IN NEW MEXICO.
    Public Law 95-232 is amended in the first section in subsection (b) 
by striking ``However, such property shall not be `Indian country' as 
defined in section 1151 of title 18, United States Code.''.
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON GAMING.
    Public Law 95-232 is amended in the first section by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(e) Prohibition on Gaming.--Gaming, as defined and regulated by 
the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), shall be 
prohibited on land held in trust pursuant to subsection (b).''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Order filed January 8 , 201 4

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 01050

- C V

____________ IN RE LIS A LUXENBURG , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 29603



### CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On November 22
, 2013
, relator, Lisa Luxenburg, filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov ’ t Code Ann. ' 22.221. Relator asked this
Court to order The Honorable Ken Wise , Judge of the 334th District Court, Harris County, Texas, to set aside his October 7, 2013 order abating the proceeding and compelling arbi tration, entered in trial court cause number 2013

- 29603 , styled Lisa Luxenburg v. J.C. Penney

.2

Because the respondent ceased to h old the office of Judge of the 334th District Court, Harris County, Texas, we are required to abate this mandamus proceeding to permit the respondent ’ s successor, T he Honorable Grant Dorfman , to reconsider the decision regarding relator ’ s request for relie f. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b). On December 5, 2013, w e abated this case for a period of thirty days and directed the new presiding judge of the 334th District Court to advise the Court of the action taken on relator’s request.

More than t hirty days have passed since the date of the abatement order. The new presiding judge of the 334th District Court has not advised the Court of the
action taken on relator’s request. Therefore, the abatement of this case is continued for a period of twenty days, at which time the new presiding judge shall advise the Court of the action taken on relator’s request. Furthermore, within twenty days of
the date of this order
, relator is directed to advise the Court of the status of trial court
cause number 2013

- 29603 , s tyled Lisa Luxenburg v. J.C. Penney

. The Court will consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss this proceeding, as appropriate.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison.
Motion Granted; Order filed February 11, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00297

- CR

____________ MICHAEL WAYNE BUNT ING , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court Galveston Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17

- CR

- 3339



### ORDER
Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 212th District Court to afford

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before 15 days from the date of this order ; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan and Poissant.