alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Continuing Abatement Order filed January 12 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 10

- 00 400

- CV

____________ KEESH A PERRY , Appellant

V.

HOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 951539



### CONTINUING ABATEMENT OR DE R
On July 22, 2011 appellee notified this court that the parties we re negotiating an agreement to settle the issues on appeal. Because of administrative process es in this matter, appellee has advised that it will take an extended period of time to finalize any settlement. Accordingly, on July 28, 2011, this court abated the appeal for a period of four months. To date, the court has not been advised whether the set tlement has been completed. Accordingly, we issue the following order.
The parties are directed to advise this court in writing of the status of the settlement. If the case has settled, an appropriate motion to dismiss the appeal should be filed. The

ap peal remains ABATED , treated as a closed case, and removed from this court = s active2

docket until February 13, 2012

. The appeal will be reinstated on this court = s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on i ts own motion.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4423 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4423

    To prevent Members of Congress from receiving any automatic pay 
                          adjustment in 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2010

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prevent Members of Congress from receiving any automatic pay 
                          adjustment in 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Pay Raise Elimination 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. NO AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENT FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IN 2011.

    For purposes of the provision of law amended by section 
704(a)(2)(B) of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 (5 U.S.C. 5318 note), no 
adjustment under section 5303 of title 5, United States Code, shall be 
considered to have taken effect in fiscal year 2011 in the rates of pay 
under the General Schedule.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlumiFuel Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Henry Fong, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.   /s/ Henry FongHenry FongPrincipal Executive Officer andPrincipal Accounting OfficerMay 23, 2011   A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ALUMIFUEL POWER CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ALUMIFUEL POWER CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EX-10.17



 Exhibit 10.17 
  





 
 23 October 2012 
 Mr Ken
Takanashi 
 Wave Life Sciences Pte Ltd 
 8 Cross Street #10-00

 PWC Building 
 Singapore 048424 

Dear Sir 
 Nominee Director Fee 

We are pleased to quote you our nominee director’s fee as follows: 
  

			
	Nominee director’s fee	  	: S$3,000 per year
		
	 Monthly bill
 (as requested)
	  	: S$250 per month

 Our Mr Koji Miura will act as a nominee director for your company. The nominee director’s fee of S$3,000/- is for a
period of one year. We will render the bill to your company on a monthly basis as per your request. The fee is payable upon the presentation of our bill to you. The resignation of the nominee director may be requested in writing by either party. The
director’s fee will be payable until the month of the director’s resignation. If you agree to the above fees, please sign on the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to us. 

Yours faithfully 
 /s/ Koji Miura 

Koji Miura 
 Managing Director 

Enc 
  
 



 







 



 
 23 October 2012 
 Mr Ken
Takanashi 
 Wave Life Sciences Pte Ltd 
 8 Cross Street #10-00

 PWC Building 
 Singapore 048424 

Dear Sir 
 Nominee Director Fee 

We are pleased to quote you our nominee director’s fee as follows: 
  

			
	Nominee director’s fee	  	: S$3,000 per year
		
	Monthly bill	  	: S$250 per month
	(as requested)	  	

 Our Mr Koji Miura will act as a nominee director for your company. The nominee director’s fee of S$3,000/- is for a
period of one year. We will render the bill to your company on a monthly basis as per your request. The fee is payable upon the presentation of our bill to you. The resignation of the nominee director may be requested in writing by either party. The
director’s fee will be payable until the month of the director’s resignation. If you agree to the above fees, please sign on the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to us. 

Yours faithfully 
 /s/ Koji Miura 

Koji Miura 
 Managing Director 

 
  

I agree to the above fees. 
  

			
	  
 Signature/Name
	  	  
 Date
## NUMBER 13 - 21 - 00366 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

E MILIO VARGAS , Appellant ,
v. T HE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.
On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County , Texas.



## O R D E R
Before Justice s Be navides, Lo ngoria , and Tijerina Order Per Curia m
Appellant, Emilio Vargas , has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction in trial court cause number 21FC

- 1613F

. The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not hav e the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of2 appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); se e id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non

appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system unhindered while eliminating, at an early stage, the time and e xpense associated with non

appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist. , 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State , 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Within thirty days of this no tice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Roberto G. Vela , is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or a dvise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice, identifying and expla ining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 614

– 15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State , 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (cert ification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any factual allegation s therein must be true and supported by the record. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 614

– 15; c f. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be t rue and supported by the record). Copies of record3 documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1, 10.2. PER CURIAM

Do not publish. T E X

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b).

Delivered and filed on th e 26th day of October 2021

.
---

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of 24 Hour Auction
  (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended November 30, 2002 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, the undersigned, being
  the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that:

|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: September 17, 2004 | Signed: | /s/ Robin Lee                                          
|------------------------ | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Name:   | Robin Lee                                              
|                         | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: E. I. DU PONT DE 

NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8

PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION,

 Civil Action 2:13-md-2433

 JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. 

 Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

This document relates to: Travis and Julie Abbott v. E. I. du Pont de

Nemours and Company, Case No. 2:17-cv-998.

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ORDER NO. 39

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law 

(ECF No. 167) and Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (ECF No. 169). These 

motions reflect the parties’ requests made in open court during the trial in this matter. Plaintiffs 

moved for judgment on the issue of the statute of limitations and Defendant moved for 

judgement on all of Plaintiffs’ claims. Both parties moved under Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth on the record during trial, the Court GRANTS

Plaintiffs’ Motion (ECF No. 167) and DENIES Defendant’s Motion (ECF No. 169).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9/8/2020 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:17-cv-00998-EAS-EPD Doc #: 241 Filed: 09/08/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 12222
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

JELANI KHAMISI,

Petitioner,

vs.

HAMILTON COUNTY, et al.,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-819

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. 

Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 2) and

TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the 

Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and submitted a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that Petitioner’s pro se petition for a writ of habeas 

corpus be dismissed without prejudice to refiling after Petitioner has exhausted all 

available state court remedies. No objections were filed. 

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 

of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its 

entirety. Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2) is ADOPTED; 
2

2. The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after 

Petitioner has exhausted all available state court remedies; 

3. A certificate of appealability shall not issue because Petitioner has not 

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right that is 

remediable at this juncture; 

4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this Order would not be 

taken in “good faith” and Petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma 

pauperis; and

5. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 2/27/19 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
CERTIFICATIONS*

I, Andrew Hyder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Subjex Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 31 2003


                                   Andrew Hyder
                                -----------------
                                   [Signature]
                                 CEO/CFO/Director


<PAGE>
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 436/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 436 |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 58ό έτος24 Δεκεμβρίου 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 436

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

58ό έτος24 Δεκεμβρίου 2015

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Πληροφορίες |
| | ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΘΕΣΜΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΙΠΑ ΟΡΓΑΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ |
| | Ευρωπαϊκό ΚοινοβούλιοΣυμβούλιο |
| 2015/C 436/01 | Δήλωση του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου σχετικά με τον κανονισμό (ΕΕ, Ευρατόμ) 2015/2422 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, της 16ης Δεκεμβρίου 2015, για την τροποποίηση του πρωτοκόλλου αριθ. 3 περί του Οργανισμού του Δικαστηρίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

IV   Πληροφορίες

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΘΕΣΜΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΙΠΑ ΟΡΓΑΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ

Ευρωπαϊκό ΚοινοβούλιοΣυμβούλιο

2015/C 436/01

Δήλωση του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου σχετικά με τον κανονισμό (ΕΕ, Ευρατόμ) 2015/2422 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, της 16ης Δεκεμβρίου 2015, για την τροποποίηση του πρωτοκόλλου αριθ. 3 περί του Οργανισμού του Δικαστηρίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

IV Πληροφορίες

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΘΕΣΜΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΙΠΑ ΟΡΓΑΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ

Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο Συμβούλιο

| 24.12.2015 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2015

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 436/1

---

Δήλωση του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου σχετικά με τον κανονισμό (ΕΕ, Ευρατόμ) 2015/2422 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, της 16ης Δεκεμβρίου 2015, για την τροποποίηση του πρωτοκόλλου αριθ. 3 περί του Οργανισμού του Δικαστηρίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης (1)

(2015/C 436/01)

Στο τέλος της μεταρρυθμιστικής διαδικασίας, το Γενικό Δικαστήριο θα απαρτίζεται από δύο δικαστές ανά κράτος μέλος. Ως εκ τούτου, προκειμένου να επιτευχθεί η ισότητα μεταξύ γυναικών και ανδρών, που είναι ένας από τους στόχους της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 3 ΣΕΕ, οι κυβερνήσεις των κρατών μελών θα πρέπει, στον μεγαλύτερο δυνατό βαθμό, στο στάδιο του διορισμού των δικαστών στο Γενικό Δικαστήριο, σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 254 ΣΛΕΕ, να διασφαλίζουν την ίση παρουσία ανδρών και γυναικών.

---

(1)  ΕΕ L 341 της 24.12.2015, σ. 14.

---
# Az Európai Unió C 436/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 436 |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 58. évfolyam2015. december 24. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 436

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

58. évfolyam2015. december 24.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Tájékoztatások |
| | AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK |
| | Európai ParlamentTanács |
| 2015/C 436/01 | Az Európai Unió Bíróságának alapokmányáról szóló 3. jegyzőkönyv módosításáról szóló, 2015. december 16-i (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelethez kapcsolódó európai parlamenti és tanácsi nyilatkozat | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

IV   Tájékoztatások

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

Európai ParlamentTanács

2015/C 436/01

Az Európai Unió Bíróságának alapokmányáról szóló 3. jegyzőkönyv módosításáról szóló, 2015. december 16-i (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelethez kapcsolódó európai parlamenti és tanácsi nyilatkozat

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

IV Tájékoztatások

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

Európai Parlament Tanács

| 24.12.2015 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2015

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

C 436/1

---

Az Európai Unió Bíróságának alapokmányáról szóló 3. jegyzőkönyv módosításáról szóló, 2015. december 16-i (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelethez (1) kapcsolódó európai parlamenti és tanácsi nyilatkozat

(2015/C 436/01)

A reformfolyamat lezárultával a Törvényszék tagállamonként két bíróból fog állni. Ezért a nők és férfiak közötti egyenlőség megvalósítása érdekében – ami az EUSZ 3. cikke értelmében az Európai Unió egyik célkitűzése – a tagállamok kormányainak a törvényszéki bírák EUMSZ 254. cikke szerinti kinevezési eljárása során a lehető legnagyobb mértékben biztosítaniuk kell a nők és férfiak egyenlő jelenlétét.

---

(1)  HL L 341., 2015.12.24., 14. o.

---
### MEMORANDUM

TO: Record

FROM: Lisa Biddle, U.S. EPA

DATE: March 23 , 2015

SUBJECT: PA and VA Class II Injection for Disposal Volume Data (DCN SGE0 1109 )

I n February 2015, EPA Office of Water (EPA OW) communicated with the Ground

Water & Enforcement Branch of the Office of Drinking Water & Source Water Protection in EPA Region 3 . EPA Region 3 reported the total volume of oil and gas extraction wastewater injected into a ctive Class II disposal wells in Pennsylvania and Virgin ia

. The data reported are presented in Table 1 and are based on annual reports EPA Region 3 receives from Class II well

operators.

Table 1

. Oil and Gas Extraction Wastewater Volumes Injected into Class II Disposal Wells

in Pennsylvania and Virginia ( 2013 and 2014)

State Number of Active

Class II Disposal

Wells a Total Volume of Extraction Wastewater Injected into Class II Disposal Wells (barrels) b

201 3 2014 Pennsylvania 6 332,763 276,601 Virginia 11 1,671,979 2,143,080

a

— This is the number of wells that accepted the oil and gas extraction wastewater.

b

— These volumes include all types of oil and gas extraction wastewater (unconventional oil and gas (UOG), conventional oil and gas (COG), and/ or coal

- bed methane (CBM)).

EPA Region 3 extracted this data from the ir internal database, Water Information Management System (WIMS)

, which is used to track information on the direct implementation states in Region 3 (i.e., the states where EPA Region 3 is the UIC program implementation authority) . This database contains information that EPA tracks on UIC permitting, in spections

and enfo rcement in PA, VA , and DC 1 . The volu metric information in this data base is provided to EPA by the operators as part of their UIC disposal well permit

- related reporting requirements. This information is maintained at EPA’s Region 3 Office in the hard copy annual reports and is

summarized in the WIMS electronic database.

1 EPA is the direct implementation authority in DC, however there are no Class II disposal wells in DC and therefore

DC is not included in Table 1.