IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION

KIT CHECK, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

HEALTH CARE LOGISTICS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:17-cv-01041-ALM-CMV 

Judge Algenon L. Marbley 

Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Pursuant to S.D. Ohio Local Patent Rule 102.2, and by the agreement of the parties, the 

Court enters the following Stipulated Protective Order (the “Protective Order”) to govern the production 

of any documents or information in this action. 

The Court recognizes that disclosure and discovery activity are likely to arise that will 

require the disclosure of trade secrets, confidential research, development, manufacturing, financial, 

process, marketing, and business information, or other commercial information within the meaning 

of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Good cause exists to protect this information from public 

disclosure. In the absence of a suitable protective order safeguarding the confidentiality of such 

information, the parties would be hampered in their ability to produce such information. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the parties shall adhere to the following: 

1. DESIGNATION OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

1.1 This Order shall govern all documents and other products of discovery obtained by 

the parties from one another, and from third parties, all information copied or derived therefrom, as 

well as all copies, excerpts, summaries or compilations thereof, including documents produced 

pursuant to requests authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, answers to interrogatories, 
- 2 - 

deposition transcripts, responses to requests for admission, affidavits, declarations, expert reports, 

and other such material and information as may be produced during the course of this litigation. 

1.2 In connection with discovery proceedings in this action, any party or third party may 

designate any non-public document, material, or information as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY” (collectively referred to as “Protected Material”). 

(a) A party may designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” any information, document, or 

thing that the party reasonably and in good faith believes to contain confidential information 

within the meaning of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(7) used by it in, or pertaining to, its business and 

that is not generally known, and which that party would not normally reveal to third parties or, 

if disclosed, would require such third parties to maintain in confidence. 

(b) A party may designate as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES 

ONLY” such materials as the party reasonably and in good faith believes to contain 

particularly sensitive technical information relating to research for and production of current 

products; technical, business, and research information regarding future products; non-public 

and highly sensitive financial information; marketing and sales information, such as marketing 

plans and forecasts, customer lists, pricing data, cost data, customer orders, and customer 

quotations; any pending or abandoned patent applications, foreign or domestic; and such other 

documents, information, or materials that relate to other proprietary information that the 

designating party reasonably believes is of such nature and character that disclosure of such 

information would be harmful to the designating party. 

1.3 The following information shall not be designated or protected under this Protective 

Order: 

(a) Information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure, including 
- 3 - 

patent file histories, publicly available prior art publications, catalogs and other advertising 

materials, press releases, and publicly-filed financial statements; 

(b) Information that at any time is made public through no act of a non-designating 

party; 

(c) Information that the designating party has not undertaken with others to maintain 

in confidence and that is in the possession of or becomes available to the receiving party other 

than through discovery in this action, but only if the receiving party can show by written 

documentation that the information independently came into its rightful possession; or 

(d) Information that is independently developed by the receiving party, as reflected 

by written documentation demonstrated to be in existence prior to production by the party 

claiming confidentiality. 

1.4 Any documents or things produced pursuant to a discovery request or other written 

materials exchanged by the parties (including discovery responses, letters, and briefs) that a party 

desires to designate as Protected Material shall be so designated by marking each page of the 

document, paper or thing CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES 

ONLY, as appropriate, and indicating the identity of the producing party (e.g., through the use of an 

identifying prefix to the document identification (Bates) number). 

1.5 In the event a party may make available certain of its files for inspection by another 

party, which files may contain non-confidential material as well as material that may be subject to 

protection under this Protective Order, with the intent that following such inspection the inspecting 

party will designate certain of the inspected documents to be copied and furnished to it, such files 

need not be marked with either confidentiality designation in advance, but shall all be treated as 

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY materials. Only those persons identified 
- 4 - 

in paragraph 2.2 below as permitted to view HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES 

ONLY materials may be present at any such inspection. When the producing party copies the 

documents to furnish to the inspecting party, the producing party shall mark Protected Material 

with the appropriate confidentiality designation to the extent warranted under paragraph 1.2. 

1.6 Whenever a deposition involves a disclosure of Protected Material, the following 

procedures shall apply: 

(a) Any party may designate any portion or all of a deposition as CONFIDENTIAL 

or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY by notifying the other parties on 

the record during the deposition. The Court Reporter shall be asked to make the appropriate 

confidentiality designation on each page of the transcript that contains CONFIDENTIAL or 

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY information. At that time, all 

persons not qualified to receive that category of information shall leave the room prior to 

continuation of the deposition and until the conclusion of such designated testimony; and 

(b) Any party may also designate any portion or all of a deposition as 

CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY by notifying 

the other parties separately in writing within thirty days of receipt of the transcript. In such 

event, the parties shall confer as to the most convenient way to segregate the designated 

portions of the transcript. All information disclosed at a deposition and all information 

contained in deposition transcripts shall be treated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 

ATTORNEY EYES ONLY for a period of thirty days after the receipt of the transcript to 

permit adequate time for review of the transcript and notice to other counsel regarding any 

designation as Protected Material by a designating party. 
- 5 - 

2. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

2.1 Protected Material, and all summaries, compilations, and derivations thereof, 

whether oral or written, shall be maintained in confidence, shall be used solely in the preparation, 

prosecution, or trial of this action and not for any other purpose (except as indicated below), and 

shall be disclosed only as provided in the following paragraphs. 

2.2 Information which has been designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 

ATTORNEY EYES ONLY may be disclosed only to: 

(a) The outside attorneys of record and their employees who are engaged in 

assisting in this action; provided that such does not include any persons participating in the 

prosecution of any present or future patent application (including the reissue of any present or 

future patent) that is a counterpart to or related to the patents-in-suit (“participating” in such 

prosecution includes preparing or reviewing patent applications, reviewing office actions, 

preparing or reviewing responses to office actions, and engaging in any discussion or other 

communication regarding the scope or validity of any claims in such patent applications or in 

the patents that are the subject of such reissue); provided that this exclusion does not apply to 

persons whose involvement with the prosecution of such patents or patent applications is 

limited to administrative oversight for billing or project assignment purposes; 

(b) Independent consultants or experts retained by the party or its attorneys in 

connection with this action, including technical experts, damage and industry experts, patent 

experts, and jury or trial consultants, together with their employees engaged in assisting in this 

action (including mock jurors), but only subject to the provisions of paragraph 2.4 below; 

provided that such does not include any persons participating in the prosecution of any present 

or future patent application (including the reissue of any present or future patent) that is a 
- 6 - 

counterpart to or related to the patents-in-suit (“participating” in such prosecution includes 

preparing or reviewing patent applications, reviewing office actions, preparing or reviewing 

responses to office actions, and engaging in any discussion or other communication regarding 

the scope or validity of any claims in such patent applications or in the patents that are the 

subject of such reissue); provided that this exclusion does not apply to persons whose 

involvement with the prosecution of such patents or patent applications is limited to 

administrative oversight for billing or project assignment purposes; 

(c) The Court and its personnel; 

(d) Court reporters and their personnel engaged in proceedings incident to 

preparation for trial or engaged in trial; 

(e) Professional vendors and their employees, including copy services, trial graphics 

services, and translation services, engaged by counsel; and 

(f) Any person who is indicated on the face of a document to have been an author, 

addressee, or copy recipient of the document, or the original source of the information. 

2.3 Information that has been designated as CONFIDENTIAL may be disclosed only to: 

(a) The persons identified in paragraph 2.2; and 

(b) Any party or employee of a party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for 

this litigation and who has signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” in Exhibit 

A. 

2.4 Protected Material shall be disclosed to consultants and experts only upon the 

following terms: 

(a) Prior to any disclosure, the consultant or expert shall be identified in writing to 

the other parties’ counsel by name, address, and corporate, business or other professional 
- 7 - 

affiliation or employment, together with a copy of the expert’s curriculum vitae and a list of the 

expert’s litigation or consulting engagements for the past three years; 

(b) Unless another party notifies the proposing party of any objection and that 

objection is received within five business days after notification (by fax, by email, or by 

overnight mail), the consultant or expert shall thereafter be allowed to have access to Protected 

Material pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Protective Order; 

(c) In the event of a timely objection, which shall be made in good faith and on 

reasonable grounds, the proposing party shall refrain from disclosure of Protected Material to 

the consultant or expert until the objection has been resolved between the parties or ruled upon 

by the Court; 

(d) The parties shall endeavor in good faith to resolve the dispute without calling 

upon the intervention of the Court. The burden is on the objecting party to seek the intervention 

of the Court by appropriate motion to preclude the proposing party from disclosing Protected 

Material to the consultant or expert. If no such motion is filed within ten business days of 

receipt of the objection, the proposing party may disclose Protected Material to the consultant 

or expert as if no objection had been raised; and 

(e) No party shall use its right to object to a proposed consultant or expert to 

interfere with the ability of another party to prepare for trial through the use of consultants and 

experts. 

2.5 Prior to receiving any Protected Material, any persons described in sections (b), (d), 

or (e) of paragraph 2.2 shall be furnished with a copy of this Protective Order and shall execute a 

copy of the “Agreement to be Bound by Protective Order” attached as Exhibit A. A copy of the 

signed Agreement shall be maintained by counsel for the party providing such access. 
- 8 - 

2.6 Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent any counsel of record from utilizing 

Protected Material in the examination of any person who is reasonably alleged to be the author or 

source of the Protected Material or who is reasonably believed to have knowledge relating thereto. 

In addition, 

(a) Parties and present employees of the parties, or employees of third parties, may 

be examined as a witness at depositions and trial and may testify concerning all Protected 

Material produced or designated by that party, or by the employee’s employer if a third party; 

(b) Former employees of the parties, or former employees of third parties, may be 

examined and may testify concerning all Protected Material produced or designated by the party 

or third party that formerly employed such person and which pertains to the period or periods of 

his/her employment and prior thereto; and 

(c) Subject to the restrictions on discovery of non-testifying/consulting experts 

provided by Rule 26(b)(4)(D) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, former experts of the 

parties may be examined and may testify concerning all Protected Material produced or 

designated by the respective party that pertains to the subject matter of his/her opinions. 

2.7 Nothing in this Protective Order shall preclude any party from introducing Protected 

Material into evidence at any evidentiary hearing or at trial. However, if anyone intends to 

introduce or refer to Protected Material at any hearing or trial, the party wishing to make the 

disclosure shall first notify the producing party and provide that party with an opportunity to object 

and/or to ask the Court to take appropriate precautionary procedures (e.g., clearing the Courtroom, 

sealing the record, etc.). 

2.8 Nothing in this Protective Order shall bar or otherwise restrict any attorney from 

rendering advice to his/her clients with respect to this litigation and referring to or relying generally 
- 9 - 

upon his/her examination of Protected Material, provided that in rendering such advice and in 

otherwise communicating with his/her clients, the attorney shall not disclose the content of such 

information. 

2.9 Nothing in this Protective Order shall bar or otherwise restrict any attorney from 

participating in or rendering advice to his/her clients with respect to any Patent Office proceeding 

involving a prior issued patent (e.g., a reexamination proceeding), that by law or by rule cannot 

enlarge the scope of the claims which are the subject of the proceeding. 

2.10 Nothing in this Protective Order shall bar or otherwise restrict any attorney from 

submitting Protected Material to the United States Patent & Trademark Office if it is material to 

patentability, as required under 37 CFR 1.56, et seq., provided that the confidential nature of the 

submitted Protected Material is protected to the extent permissible by rule or law. 

2.11 All persons in possession of Protected Material shall exercise reasonable and 

appropriate care with regard to the storage, custody, and use of such information in order to ensure 

that the provisions of this Protective Order are observed and the confidential nature of the 

information is maintained. 

3. CHALLENGES TO CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 

3.1 Any party believing that particular information has been improperly marked, i.e., 

that it is not in fact CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES 

ONLY, may challenge such designation at any time by raising the issue, in writing to the 

designating party, and specifically identifying, by document identification (Bates) number, by 

deposition page and line, or by other appropriate specific identifier, the information whose 

confidentiality status is challenged. Within ten business days of receipt of such writing, the 

designating party shall either remove or reduce the designation, or respond that it has reviewed the 
- 10 - 

matter and continues to maintain the designation in good faith. 

3.2 The parties shall endeavor in good faith to resolve any such dispute without calling 

upon the intervention of the Court. If the designating party maintains its designation and the parties 

are unable to reach agreement, the challenging party may bring the issue to the Court. The party 

asserting confidentiality shall have the burden of establishing the appropriateness of the 

designation, except that a party claiming that information designated by the other as confidential is 

in the public domain shall have the burden of proving such public knowledge. 

3.3 Challenged information shall be treated as designated until the resolution of the 

dispute by the parties or ruling by the Court. 

4. FILING OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

This Protective Order does not authorize filing protected materials under seal. According to 

the authority of Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co., 78 F.3d 219 (6th Cir. 1996), no 

document may be filed with the Court under seal without prior permission as to each such filing, 

upon motion and for good cause shown, including the legal basis for filing under seal. Unless the 

Court orders otherwise, all sealed documents shall be filed according to S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 5.2.1. 

5. TERMINATION OF LITIGATION 

5.1 The obligations of this Protective Order shall survive the termination of the action 

and continue to bind the parties. Within sixty days after termination of this action by judgment, 

settlement, or otherwise from which no appeal can be brought, each party shall destroy all 

documents containing or disclosing Protected Material of any other party. Each party’s outside 

litigation counsel shall have the right to retain one copy of the pleadings; of motions, memoranda, 

documents, and papers filed with the Court; of deposition transcripts and exhibits; and of any 

documents constituting work product. 
- 11 - 

6. THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY 

6.1 In the event that any third party shall be called upon, by subpoena or otherwise, to 

provide or produce documents or information considered CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY by such third party, such third party may elect to 

have its information treated in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order by so notifying 

counsel for all parties in writing. Upon service of such notice, such third party may designate 

documents and information as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY 

EYES ONLY in the manner set forth in this Protective Order, and such third party’s designated 

information shall be protected in the same manner as that of the parties to this action. 

7. INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE 

7.1 If a party inadvertently discloses any document or thing containing information that 

it deems CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY without 

designating it pursuant to this Protective Order, the disclosing party shall promptly upon discovery 

of such inadvertent disclosure inform the receiving party in writing, forwarding a replacement copy 

of the inadvertently disclosed material properly marked with the appropriate confidentiality 

designation. The receiving party shall thereafter treat the information as if it had been properly 

marked from the outset and shall make a reasonable effort to retrieve and destroy the unmarked 

version of the inadvertently disclosed material. Disclosure by the receiving party to unauthorized 

persons before being notified of the inadvertent disclosure shall not constitute a violation of this 

Protective Order. Nothing in this Protective Order shall preclude the receiving party from 

challenging the confidentiality designation of the late-marked material pursuant to the provisions of 

paragraph 3. 

7.2 In accordance with Federal Evidence Rule 502(d), except when a party intentionally 

and expressly waives attorney-client privilege or work-product protection by disclosing information 
- 12 - 

to an adverse party as provided in Federal Evidence Rule 502(a), the production or disclosure of 

documents or other information subject to the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, 

or other privilege or immunity shall not be deemed a waiver of a claim of privilege, either as to the 

specific information disclosed or as to any other related information. Further, the provisions of 

Federal Evidence Rule 502(b)(2) are inapplicable to the production of such information. If a 

producing party produces or otherwise discloses to a receiving party information that is subject to 

such privilege or immunity, the producing party shall promptly upon discovery of such disclosure 

so advise the receiving party in writing and request that the disclosed information be returned. The 

receiving party shall return all copies or extracts of the produced information within five business 

days of receipt of the request. Any notes or summaries referring or relating to any produced 

privileged material shall be destroyed. Nothing in this Order shall preclude the receiving party 

returning the produced material from contesting the claim of attorney-client privilege or workproduct protection and seeking an order compelling the production of information previously 

produced, but the receiving party shall not assert as a ground for compelling disclosure the fact or 

circumstances of the disclosure. This Order does not preclude a party from intentionally and 

expressly waiving the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, and the provisions of 

Federal Evidence Rule 502(a) shall apply when the producing party uses or indicates that it may 

affirmatively use information produced under this Order to support a claim or defense in the case. 

8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 

8.1 If Protected Material in the possession of any receiving party is subpoenaed by any 

court, by any administrative or legislative body, or by any other person purporting to have authority 

to subpoena such information, or is the subject of any discovery request under Rules 30-36 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any comparable rule of court or of any adjudicative body (such 

subpoena or discovery request collectively referred to as a “Third Party Request”), the party to 
- 13 - 

whom the Third Party Request is directed will not produce such information without first giving 

prompt written notice (including a copy of the Third Party Request) to the attorneys of record for 

the producing party, no more than three business days after receiving the Third Party Request. The 

party receiving the Third Party Request must also promptly inform in writing the party who caused 

the Third Party Request to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the 

Third Party Request is subject to this Protective Order. The party receiving the Third Party Request 

must deliver a copy of this Protective Order promptly to the party in the other action that caused the 

Third Party Request to issue. 

8.2 The producing party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in court 

of its own Protected Material, and nothing in this Protective Order should be construed as 

authorizing or encouraging a party receiving a Third Party Request to disobey a lawful directive 

from another court. Disclosure of information in response to a properly issued Third Party Request 

shall not constitute a violation of this Protective Order. 

8.3 This Protective Order may be modified only by further Order of the Court, whether 

sua sponte or by agreement of the parties or their counsel and approval by the Court, and is without 

prejudice to the rights of any party to move for relief from any of its provisions, or to seek or agree 

to different or additional protection for any particular material or information. 

8.4 Treatment by counsel or the parties of information designated CONFIDENTIAL or 

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY as designated shall not be construed as 

an admission by any party that the designated information contains trade secrets or other 

proprietary or confidential information. Conversely, failure to so designate shall not constitute a 

waiver of any party’s claims, either within or outside this action, that any such documents or 

information do contain trade secrets or other proprietary or confidential information. 
- 14 - 

8.5 No party shall be obligated to challenge the propriety of any designation, and failure 

to challenge a claim of confidentiality at the time of receipt shall not constitute a waiver of the right 

to challenge a confidentiality designation at any later time. 

IT IS SO ORDERED:

 /s/ Chelsey M. Vascura 

CHELSEY M. VASCURA 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

AGREED TO: 

/s/ David S. Bloomfield, Jr. 

David S. Bloomfield, Jr., Trial Attorney (0068158) 

Jared M. Klaus (0087780) 

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP 

41 South High Street, 29th Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

(614) 227-2000 

(614) 227-2100 facsimile 

dbloomfield@porterwright.com 

jklaus@porterwright.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Jeffrey S. Standley 

Jeffrey S. Standley (0047248) 

F. Michael Speed, Jr. (0067541) 

Standley Law Group LLP 

6300 Riverside Drive 

Dublin, OH 43017 

(614) 792-5555 

(614) 792-5536 facsimile 

jstandley@standleyllp.com 

mspeed@standleyllp.com 

litigation@standleyllp.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 
DMS/10970520v.6 

EXHIBIT A

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION

KIT CHECK, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

HEALTH CARE LOGISTICS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:17-cv-01041-ALM-CMV 

Judge Algenon L. Marbley 

Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura 

AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER

I, , hereby acknowledge that I received a copy of the 

Stipulated Protective Order in this action (the “Protective Order”). I have read and understand the 

Protective Order and agree to be bound by its provisions. I agree not to copy or use any 

CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY information that 

may be provided to me for any purpose other than in connection with this action and what is 

authorized by the Protective Order, and I agree not to reveal any such information to any person not 

authorized by the Protective Order. 

I further acknowledge and understand that a violation of the Protective Order may subject 

me to penalties of the Court, and I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Ohio in connection with any proceedings concerning enforcement 

of the Protective Order. 

Dated: Signature: 

Print Name: 

Address: