alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 2018 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION

Results 

BMO Harris Bank N.A. 

2:17-cv-766 

vs Judge Smith 

Barham Legal, LLC, et al 

Mediator Thomas M Tyack 

MEDIATOR=S SETTLEMENT WEEK REPORT

Following the conference, please return this report to the Jessica Rector in Room 235 (or by email at 

Jessica_Rector@ohsd.uscourts.gov). 

I. RESULTS OF CONFERENCE

1. The case is settled. Dismissal entry to be filed by . 

(Date) 

2. Negotiations have not reached impasse, but the case requires: 

a. additional negotiations between counsel. 

Counsel will file status report by . 

(Date) 

b. additional conference with 

 Mediator, to be held on . 

(Date) 

 Magistrate Judge 

 District Judge 

3. Negotiations are at impasse. The case 

 requires additional discovery 

 requires resolution of a dispositive motion 

 is ready for trial 

 (other) 

 

II. COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER

1. Were all persons with settlement authority present? 

 Yes No (Please explain) 

2. Were all trial counsel present? 

 Yes No (Please explain) 

3. Were offers/demand exchanged prior to the conference? 

 Yes No (Please explain) 

III. COMMENTS: (Use back for comments) Do not disclose substance of discussions or other confidential 

information. 

Case: 2:17-cv-00766-GCS-KAJ Doc #: 16-1 Filed: 02/23/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 336
Exhibit
10.2

    


    June 12,
2010

    


    Mr. Liang
Li

    Director
of Business Management Department

    China
United Coal Bed Methane Corporation Ltd.

    


    With
regard to the Shouyang Project CBM Purchase and Sale Contract dated June 12,
2010, CUCBM and FEEB agree that CUCBM is the sole signatory to the GSA, but FEEB
is one of the beneficiaries under the GSA.  CUCBM and FEEB agree that
FEEB and its affiliates may disclose the contents of the GSA to potential
investors and consultants or otherwise as required by the rules of any stock
exchange, applicable law, or a valid court order.  CUCMB and FEEB
understand that they are each respectively entitled to their share of any VAT
refunds and government subsidies under the current government policies related
to sales of gas from the Shouyang PSC area.

    


    
      
        	
                Yours
      truly,

              
	 
      
	
                FAR
      EAST ENERGY (BERMUDA), LTD.

              
	 
      
	
                /s/ Michael R. McElwrath

              
	
                Name: 
      Michael R. McElwrath

              
	
                Title:   
      Chairman

              


      

    

    


    Agreed
and Accepted this 12 day of June, 2010.

    


    Business
Management Department, China United Coal Bed Methane Corporation
Ltd.

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    By:

                  	
                    /s/ Liang Li

                  
	 
      	 
      
	
                    Printed
      Name:

                  	
                    Liang Li

                  
	 
      	 
      
	
                    Title:
#### Hannah Taylor v. Charles B. King and others.

*JEqu&ty pleading and practice: Distinct and discordant interests: Multifariousness.*A "bill in equity wliiclx seeks to bring into question and have adjudicated distinct and discordant interests is held demurrable for multifariousness.

*Equity pleading and practice: Partition: Parties.*A partition bill which discloses that persons not made parties.have like interests with those set np by the complainant -is held demurrable for want of parties.

*Heard April 22.*

*Decided April 27.*

Appeal In Chancery from Jaclcson Circuit.

This was a bill for partition. The defendants appear from the bill to claim interests which are distinct in separate parcels of the land' of • which partition is sought. The bill also discloses that persons not made parties have like interests jn the-lands with those which the -complainant claims to hold. Demurrers were interposed- directed towards these- and some other defects, and they were sustained below and complainant appealed. ■

*George C. Worth,*for complainant: ■

*Thomas A. Wilson*and *Higby. &*Gibson, for defendants.

Per Curiam:

The .court below dismissed the bill on demurrer, and complainant appealed.

*43The decree was proper. The bill attempted to bring' into question and have adjudicated distinct and discordant interests, and was liable to complaint for multifariousness. Besides, on the theory on which it proceeded, it was defective' for want of parties.

Other objections do not require to be noticed.

The decree should be affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PETRACOM HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                       602
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,776
<PP&E>                                          17,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,440
<BONDS>                                         97,198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,966
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     (22,190)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,491
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,982
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   479
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,593)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,593)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (44)
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 28, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00858

- CR

Evangelos PAGONIS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bex ar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008CR6730

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Evangelos Pagonis pleaded nolo

contendere to the offenses of indecency with a child by exposure and indecency with a child by

sexual c ontact. The trial court sentenced appellant on February 10, 2010

.

On November 2, 2018, this court received a document titled “Appeal Order for

Commutation of Sentence ,” in which appellant appears to request that his sentences be

commuted because his deportation to Canada is imminent.

Upon review, it appears this court lacks jurisdiction over this matter. A defendant may

appeal a judgment imposing a sentence or another appealable order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.10.

It does not appear that appellant is seeking to appeal the judgments im posing his sentences or

any other appealable order.

Accordingly, we ORDER that appellant show cause in writing on or before December

10, 2018 why th i s appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of November, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
CORN ACREAGE

What is Included in NASS Estimates

Included in NASS Corn Estimates

Planted 

Acres Grain Harvested Acres

Silage Harvested Acres 

1/

Planted and Expected to be Harvested for Grain Yes Yes No

Planted and Expected to be Harvested for Seed Yes Yes No

Planted to Other Crop that Failed, then Planted to Corn and 

Expected to be Harvested for Grain Yes Yes No

Planted, Failed, Replanted to Corn and Expected to be 

Harvested for Grain Yes (Counted Once) Yes No

Planted and Expected to be Harvested for Silage Yes No Yes

Planted and Originally Expected to be Harvested for Grain, but 

Now Expected to be Harvested for Silage Yes No Yes

Took Prevented Plant Claim for Any Crop, Planted Corn as 

Cover Crop for Silage Yes No Yes

Planted, but Failed Yes No No

Planted and Expected to be Harvested for Hay/Forage Yes No No

Planted, Failed, then Planted to Other Crop Yes No No

Intended to be Planted, Didn't Plant, Took Prevented Plant 

Claim No No No

Intended to be Planted, Didn't Plant, and Didn't Take 

Prevented Plant Claim No No No

1/ Estimates only published at end of season.

Questions: Contact Lance Honig, Crops Branch Chief - Lance.Honig@usda.gov Updated: August 9, 2019

Scenario Description

To assist users who may have questions about what is included in NASS corn acreage estimates, the table 

below documents whether or not acres are included for a number of scenarios. NASS procedures for 

inclusion and exclusion are unchanged from previous years.
FUMIGANT VOC REGULATIONS 

ENCLOSURE 2 

NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS 

CALIFORNIA STATE OF ._,_" . f . .................... 

.. 1001 - - . 11111 ......... STREET ...........-...-....- - - t . 4TH FLOOR 

ATTN: SHERYL STILLWELL -.--......-.... - - - PROOF OF PUBLICATION .................. . .......... 

SACRAMENTO CA 95814 - 1 .-.- 

COUNTY OF FRESNO 

STATE OF CALIFORN 

The undersigned states: 

3, 

' I. I' 

lf !~QU,>~$Y; spedal &(c$np&dahbn ,o( bnp"agd needsr2$l&se n~tify4DPR at 

1916~49$-4360.llY/TDD speech-to-speech usen may dial 7-1.1 fbr'thitali6miA kldy Sarvlce: . , 

' (PUB: Pecember 8,9, 1008) 

FPROOFAD 

McClatchy Newspapers in and on all dates herein stated 

was a corporation, and the owner and publisher of The 

Fresno Bee. 

The Fresno Bee is a daily newspaper of general 

circulation now published, and on all-the-dates herein 

stated was published in the City of Fresno, County of 

Fresno, and has been adjudged a newspaper of general 

circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Fresno, 

State of California, under the date of November 22, 1994, 

Action No. 520058-9. 

The undersigned is and on all dates herein mentioned 

was a citizen of the United States, over the age of 

twenty-one years, and is the principal clerk of the printer 

and publisher of said newspaper; and that the notice, a 

copy of which is hereto annexed, marked Exhibit A, hereby 

made a pan hereof, was published in The Fresno Bee in 

each issue thereof (in type not smaller than nonpareil), on 

the following dates. 

I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the 

foregoing is true and correct.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David Peter Hess, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advent Software, Inc.;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
| April 29,   2015                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |
| /s/   David Peter Hess                  |   |
| David   Peter Hess                      |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer and President |   |
| (Principal   Executive Officer )        |   |

 

----
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
September 10, 2012 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2012-4 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
EXHIBIT 99.2


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO Section 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of RDC  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form  [10-Q/10-QSB]  for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Anthony Cella,  Chief  Financial  Officer (or the equivalent  thereof) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.







                            /s/ Anthony Cella
                            ------------------------------------------------
                            Anthony Cella
                            Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent thereof)
                            August 15, 2002
No. 1939.

#### Morgan *v.*Wright.

April Term, 1886.

September 23, 1886.

This case involved the same points, and was argued by the same attorneys, as the case of *Morgan*v. *Smith, ante,*337, which is referred to and adopted as the decision of this appeal.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McIver,
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


David H. Brown, Chief Executive Officer and Joseph E. Riordan, Chief Financial
Officer of Valley Community Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), each certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
      2003 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and

2.    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: November 3, 2003

                                              By /s/              David H. Brown
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                                  David H. Brown
                                                                   President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                           By /s/              Joseph E. Riordan
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                               Joseph E. Riordan
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:17-cr-239

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

ROBERT LEE LOVETT, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On October 27, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to an

Information charging him with being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§

922(g), 924. (Doc. 23). The Information also contains a forfeiture count. Defendant, represented

by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge

conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS
Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of being a felon

in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7367

LARRY KNIGHT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, BUCKINGHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-600-AM)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Knight, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

July 9, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered

on the docket sheet on July 15, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and

79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Knight appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Knight v. Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center, No. CA-98-600-AM (E.D. Va. July 15, 1998).* We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Principal  Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,  (i) the Form 10-QSB of
Weststar  Financial  Services  Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended
March  31,  2005 (the  "Report"),  as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods  presented
therein.


                                        WESTSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Date: May 11, 2005                  By: /s/   G. Gordon Greenwood
                                        -------------------------------------

                                        G. Gordon Greenwood
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                                                              25