alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1451

BONNIE G. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS; LAIDLAW

TRANSIT, INCORPORATED; DART TRANSPORTATION;

WILBUR E. JOHNSON; GARY WHITE, III; JOSEPH F.

ANDERSON, JR.; MARILYN GURLEY; J. RENE JOSEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-02-268-3-19BD)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 23, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bonnie G. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bonnie G. Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without

prejudice her civil rights complaint. The court dismissed Smith’s

complaint based in part on her failure to allege specific facts

supporting her claims of conspiracy or violation of her equal

protection right.

Because Smith may be able to proceed with this action by

amending her complaint to allege sufficient facts to state a claim,

the dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject to

appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local

Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
8071

#### MORGAN & AUSTIN v. MOORHEAD.

1. Appeal. — Findings by master in a law ease referred by consent supported by evidence are accepted as final.

2. Evidence- — Pleading—Principal and Agent. — Under a complaint for goods sold and delivered, it is competent to show that defendant bought the goods through his agent, whose act he ratified and for whose purchases he promised to pay without allegations that plaintiff relied on such agreement.

Before Gage, J., Greenville, April, 1911.

Affirmed.

Action by Morgan &, Austin against W. L. Moorhead. Defendant appeals.

*Mr. Wm. G.*Sirrine, for appellant,

cites: *Amendment came too late:*81 S. C. 574; 21 S. C. 221; 55 S. C. 90; 64 S. C. 491; 3 S. C. 411.

*Mr. B. A.*Morgan, contra,

cites: *Findings in law case will not be disturbed:*26 S. C. 304; 33 S. C. 359. *Account may be proved by admissions:*27 S. C. 156; 86 S. C. 315. *One receiving goods knowingly must pay for them:*46 S. C. 15.

December 29, 1911.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones.

This was an action for building material sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendant. An order was made by consent referring issues of law and fact to the master, who found in favor of plaintiffs. Exceptions were taken to the master’s report. Judge Gage confirmed the findings of the master, and gave judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of $223.90.

1 There being some testimony tending to establish the conclusions of fact by the Circuit Court, under the well settled rule in actions at law, we accept such conclusions as final.

*279From these findings it appears that defendant ratified the acts of J. A. Capell as agent in purchasing the materials from plaintiffs and having them charged in defendant’s name, and that defendant promised to pay for same.

2 The only question of law presented to the Circuit Court was whether the master erred in allowing testimony to show a subsequent promise by defendant to pay the debts of Capell, as there was no allegation in the complaint that plaintiffs relied on such agreement. Under a complaint for goods sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendant it was competent to show that defendant bought the goods through his agent, whose acts he ratified and for whose purchases he promised to pay. The appellant’s contention) that the debt sued on was the debt of Capell as an independent contractor is opposed to the facts as found by the master and Circuit Court.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
February 2, 2012 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2012-1 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Partners of 

Star Gas Partners, L.P.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in registration statement No. 333-49751 on Form S-4 of Star Gas Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries of our report dated December 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Star Gas Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries asof September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partner’s capital and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2008, therelated financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2008, which report appears in the September 30, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Star Gas Partners, L.P. andsubsidiaries. 

KPMG LLP 

Stamford, Connecticut 

December 10, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on March 24, 2015, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (“IMS Global”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA; Microsoft, Redmond, WA; PARCC, Inc., Washington, DC; State of Michigan Department of Education, Lansing, MI; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, Jenzabar, Cambridge, MA; SungKyunKwan University, Gyeonggi-do, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; and McGraw-Hill CTB, Nashville, TN, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and IMS Global intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 8, 2014. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 5, 2015 (80 FR 259).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2015-09316 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENT INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1995
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   100
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

# AGENCY:

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) announces the appointment of members of the PBGC Performance Review Board.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), made applicable by PBGC's Senior Level Performance Management System, PBGC announces the appointment of those individuals who have been selected to serve as members of PBGC's Performance Review Board. The Performance Review Board is responsible for making recommendations on each senior level (SL) professional's annual summary rating, performance-based adjustment, and performance award to the appointing authority.

The following individuals have been designated as members of PBGC's 2021 Performance Review Board:

1. Gordon Hartogensis, Director

2. Kristin Chapman, Chief of Staff

3. David Foley, Chief of Benefits Administration

4. Patricia Kelly, Chief Financial Officer

5. Alice Maroni, Chief Management Officer

Issued in Washington, DC.

Gordon Hartogensis,

Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

[FR Doc. 2022-00233 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7709-02-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4255 

To prevent Members of Congress from receiving any automatic pay 

adjustment in 2011. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2009 

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in 

addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a 

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prevent Members of Congress from receiving any 

automatic pay adjustment in 2011. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop the Automatic 

5 Pay Raise for Members of Congress in Fiscal Year 2011 

6 Act’’. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4255 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENT FOR MEMBERS 

2 OF CONGRESS IN 2011. 

3 For purposes of the provision of law amended by sec4 tion 704(a)(2)(B) of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 (5 

5 U.S.C. 5318 note), no adjustment under section 5303 of 

6 title 5, United States Code, shall be considered to have 

7 taken effect in fiscal year 2011 in the rates of pay under 

8 the General Schedule. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                          EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC.
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 
ESA Management, Inc., Delaware
ESA West, Inc., Nevada
ESA International, Inc., Delaware
Extended Stay Canada, Inc.
ESA C 1, Inc., Delaware
 
ESA-Norcross Inc., Georgia
ESA 0100, INC., South Carolina
ESA 0102, INC., Georgia
ESA 0115, INC., South Carolina
ESA 0121, INC., Tennessee
ESA 0124, INC., Alabama
ESA 0125, INC., Tennessee
ESA 0127, INC., North Carolina
ESA 0131, INC., South Carolina
ESA 0132, INC., South Carolina
ESA 0140, INC., Virginia
ESA 0145, INC., Arkansas
ESA 0150, INC., Delaware
ESA 0155, INC., Alabama
ESA 0161, INC., North Carolina
ESA 0163, INC., Tennessee
ESA 0172, INC., Missouri
ESA 0175, INC., Virginia
ESA 0180, INC., South Carolina
ESA 0201, INC., North Carolina
ESA 0280, INC., North Carolina
ESA 0291, INC., Virginia
ESA 0295, INC., Kentucky
ESA 0296, INC., Kentucky
ESA 0305, INC., Tennessee
ESA 0315, INC., Tennessee
ESA 0325, INC., Kentucky
ESA 0331, INC., Mississippi
ESA 0362, INC., Utah
ESA 0370, INC., North Carolina
ESA 0379, INC., Utah
ESA 0381, INC., Florida
ESA 0410, INC., Virginia
ESA 0450, INC., Tennessee
ESA 0480, INC., Virginia
ESA 0486, INC., Delaware
<PAGE>
 
ESA 0501, INC., New York
ESA 0503, INC., New York
ESA 0504, INC., New York
Carnegie ESA 0507, INC., Pennsylvania
ESA 0510, INC., Illinois
ESA 0521, INC., Kansas
ESA 0522, INC., Missouri
ESA 0525, INC., Illinois
ESA 0526, INC., Indiana
ESA 0530, INC., Illinois
ESA 0532, INC., Illinois
ESA 0541, INC., Illinois
ESA 0552, INC., Michigan
ESA 0553, INC., Ohio
ESA 0554, INC., Illinois
ESA 0555, INC., Ohio
ESA 0557, INC., Wisconsin
ESA 0561, INC., Missouri
ESA 0562, INC., Missouri
ESA 0564, INC., Ohio
ESA 0565, INC., Ohio
ESA 0574, INC., New Jersey
ESA 0590, INC., Ohio
ESA 0600, INC., Michigan
ESA 0629, INC., Kentucky
ESA 0640, INC., Illinois
ESA 0658, INC., Maryland
ESA 0660, INC., Illinois
ESA 0670, INC., Michigan
ESA 0675, INC., Michigan
ESA 0680, INC., Michigan
ESA 0691, INC., Missouri
ESA 0700, INC., Missouri
ESA 0745, INC., Minnesota
ESA 0765, INC., New York
ESA 0780, INC., Michigan
ESA 0785, INC., Wisconsin
ESA 0788, INC., Georgia
ESA 0806, INC., Washington
ESA 0815, INC., Washington
ESA 0828, INC., Idaho
ESA 0858, INC., Nevada
ESA 0859, INC., Nevada
ESA 0860, INC., Nevada
ESA 0861, INC., Nevada
ESA 0876, INC., Oklahoma
ESA 0884, INC., Florida
ESA 0886, INC., Texas
ESA 0901, INC., Colorado
ESA 0903, INC., Delaware
ESA 0911, INC., Delaware
ESA 0919, INC., California
<PAGE>
 
ESA 0936, INC., Delaware
ESA 0939, INC., Delaware
ESA 0942, INC., Arizona
ESA 0976, INC., Delaware
ESA 0977, INC., Arizona
ESA 0985, INC., Louisiana
ESA 0986, INC., Louisiana
ESA 0990, INC., Georgia
ESA 0992, INC., Georgia
ESA 0993, INC., Georgia
ESA 0994, INC., Colorado
ESA 0995, INC., Kansas
ESA 0996, INC., Georgia
Exhibit
        32.1
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sinoenergy Corporation
        (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bo
        Huang, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Lan Gu, the Chief Financial Officer,
        of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
        pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
        and belief that:
  (1) the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:  August
        14, 2008
  /s/
                  Bo HuangBo
                  HuangChief
                  Executive Officer/s/
                   Lan GuChief
                  Financial Officer
From: Ed Barry [mailto:edward.barry@lhoist.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 4:33 PM 

To: McKaughan, Colleen 

Cc: Eric Hiser; Herbert Verville; Mark Johnson 

Subject: Response to EPA Request - Nelson BART 

Colleen, 

Please see attachments for our response. Any questions, please ask. 

Thanks, Ed 

Ed Barry 

Western Environmental Manager 

Lhoist North America 

Office 480-368-4239 

Cell 602-321-6752
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. on Form
10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dennis Crowley, the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Spear & Jackson,
      Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      quarterly report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
      have:

      a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the registrant, including its
           consolidated subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
           report is being prepared;

      b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
           and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
           evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent function):

      a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
           record, process, summarise and report financial data and have
           identified for the registrant's auditors and material weakness in
           internal controls; and

      b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
           controls;

/s/ Dennis Crowley
----------------

Dennis Crowley
Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 8, 2004