alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09170]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License to Hydro-
Qu[eacute]bec; Montreal Canada

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), 
the Department of the Army hereby gives notice of its intent to grant 
to Hydro Qu[eacute]bec; a corporation having its principle place of 
business at 75 Ren[eacute]-L[eacute]vesque Blvd. West Montr[eacute]al, 
Qu[eacute]bec, H2Z 1A4, Canada, exclusive license relative to the 
following U.S. Patent and Patent Application Titled ``High Voltage 
Lithium Ion Positive Electrode Material'':
    <bullet> United States Utility Patent Application Serial No. US 14/
281,924
    <bullet> United States Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 
61/911,700
    <bullet> All foreign counterpart applications

DATES: The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless within 
fifteen (15) days from the date of this published notice, the U.S. Army 
Research Laboratory receives written objections including evidence and 
argument that establish that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 
Competing applications completed and received by the U.S. Army Research 
Laboratory within fifteen (15) days from the date of this published 
notice will also be treated as objections to the grant of the 
contemplated exclusive license.
    Objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made 
available to the public for inspection and, to the extent permitted by 
law, will not be released under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552.

ADDRESSES: Send written objections to Thomas Mulkern, U.S. Army 
Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, 
ATTN: RDRL-DPP, B321, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Mulkern, (410) 278-0889.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-09170 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
exv4w1







Exhibit 4.1







	Incorporated in the Cayman Islands            HiSoft Technology International Limited
This is to certify that of is are the registered shareholders of: Type of Share
No. of Shares            Common %Paid            Certificate Number 100.00 Date of Record
I            transferable in accordance therewith. Articles of Association of the
Company and transferable in therewith. Given under the Common Seal of the Company
Director / Secretary            Director
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 8, 

2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________ 

NO. 14-11-00811-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF S.G.K., AND J.L.A.K, Children

On Appeal from the 506th District Court 

Grimes County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 31691

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order signed August 19, 2011. On December 2, 2011, 

appellant filed a letter in which he advised this court that he no longer desires to 

prosecute this appeal. We construe the letter as a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally.
Opinion issued August 15, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00315-CV

———————————

HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellant

V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND JIMMY MORENO, Appellees

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-25985

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Harris County Appraisal District (“HCAD”), has filed a motion 

to dismiss the appeal. Appellee Texas Workforce Commission has filed a response 

in opposition to HCAD’s motion to dismiss, arguing that this appeal should not be 

dismissed because resolution of this appeal on the merits “is likely dispositive of” 
2

14 cases currently pending in the trial courts and would therefore “serve the 

purpose of judicial economy.”1 The Commission, however, did not file a notice of 

appeal, nor does it contend that it is seeking any relief from the trial court’s 

judgment in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(c), 26.1(a), (d), 42.1(a)(1). 

The motion complies with Rule 42.1. Accordingly, we grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Massengale.

 

1

Texas Workforce Commission also objects to HCAD’s motion based on HCAD’s 

failure to confer with the Commission prior to filing the motion. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 10.1(a)(5). This objection does not, however, provide a substantive basis for 

denying the motion.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  May 10, 2010








/s/ Frank Waung


---------------------


Name: Frank Waung


Title: Chief Financial Officer


(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Paul S. Lipschutz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. and will be retained by Collectible Concepts
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.





Date:
                February 22, 2008
            By:*/s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ*Paul
                S. LipschutzChief
                Executive Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On December 29, 2021, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *New-Indy Catawba LLC,*
                     Civil Action No. 0:21-cv-02053-SAL. The United States filed this lawsuit under the Clean Air Act. The United States' complaint seeks injunctive relief related to emissions of Hydrogen Sulfide from defendant's paper mill in Catawba, South Carolina. The consent decree requires the defendant to perform injunctive relief to abate hydrogen sulfide emissions, and to pay a $1.1 million civil penalty. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *New-Indy Catawba LLC,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-2-1-12471. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: *To submit comments:*
*Send them to:*By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined at and downloaded from this Justice Department website: 
                    *https://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $8.75 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Lori Jonas, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2022-00198 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 0085 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 078 -AD
STATE OF WASHINGTON 

### DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47600 • Olympia, WA 98504-7600 • 360-407-6000 711 for Washington Relay Service o Persons with <1 Sfjeech disability can call**877~833~6341** October 23, 2012

Mr. Dan Opalski, Director Office ofWater and Watersheds USEPA- Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 

### RE: Correction ofthe Enclosure document sent August 28, 2012, for the final certification ofthe National PollutantDischargeElimination System Vessel and Small Vessel GeneralPermits for discharges incidental to the normal operation to waters ofthe U.S. in the state ofWashington Dear Mr. Opalski: Ithas come to our attention that the enclosure document to our August 28, 2012, letter with our final certification ofthe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Vessel and Small Vessel General Permits (VGP and sVGP) was in e11'or. Please use the enclosed conditions for the VGP and sVGP. Ifyou have any questions or would like to discuss these matters fmiher, please contact Bill Moore at bill.moore@ecy.wa.gov, or (360) 407-6460; orRandall Marshall at randall.marshall@ecy.wa.gov, or (360) 407- 6445. Sincerely,

Ke y Susewind P.E., P.G. Water Quality Program Manager Enclosures (2)

cc: Bill Moore Randall Marshall 

### By Certified Mail 7010 0780 0002 3523 6101- RETURNRECEIPT REQUESTED
### USGS H Conta c Searc h 

## Gulf of Mexico Inte grated Science - Suwannee Rive r Basin and Estuary Initiative
Home | Suwannee River Basin and Estuary Initiative

Suwannee River Drainage Basin (View Enlargement) Suwannee Information Gateway Visualization Tool Suwannee Interactive Mapping Syst e Suwannee Map Gallery Meetings Publications Photo Tours Related Links In the News Contact Information

USGS Florida Integrated Science Cente r

In response to the growing number of environmental concerns in the mostly pristine Suwa basin and the Suwannee River estuary system, th e States of Florida and Georgia, the Federal government, and other local organizations have identified the Suwannee River as an ecosyste m protection because of its unique biota and important water reso urces. Organiza tions with vest e in the region formed a coalitio n, the Suwannee Basin Interage ncy Alliance (SBIA), whose goal s promote coordination in the id entification, management, and sci entific knowledge of the natur in the basin and estuary. To date, however, an integrated assessment of the physical, biologi c water resources has not been completed. A holistic, multi-disciplinary approach is needed to address the research needs in the basi n estuary and to provide supportive data for meeting management objectives of the entire ecos y USGS is well situated to focus on the larger co ncerns of the basin and estuary by addressing s research questions linking wate r supply and quality to ecosyste m function and health across c o state boundaries. We are interested in developing a strategic plan in c ooperation with Federal , local agencies to identify and implement studies to address th e most compellin g research issu e management questions, and to conduct fundamental environmental monitoring studies.

USGS Open-File Report 2005-1210: Suwannee River Basi n and Estuary: An Integrated Science Program - Wh Download PDF USGS Open-File Report 2004-1198, Suwannee River Basin and Estuary Initiative: Executive Summary. Dow n (Get FREE Adobe Acrobat Reader ) 

### Pa g e 1 of 2 Suwannee River Basin and Estuar y Initiative - Welcome!

7/22/2011 htt p :// g ulfsci.us g s. g ov/suwannee/index.htmlU.S. Department of the Interior , U.S. Geological Survey , Gulf of Mexico Integrated Science URL of this page is: http://gul fsci.usgs.gov/suwannee/index.html Comments or questions? Contact: Renee Koenig - Webmaster or 727-803-8747 ext. 3125 This page last revised: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 @ 01:44 PM (RRK) USGS Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Freedom of Information Act| Accessibility 

### Pa g e 2 of 2 Suwannee River Basin and Estuar y Initiative - Welcome!

7/22/2011 htt p :// g ulfsci.us g s. g ov/suwannee/index.html
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

LOWELL W. THOMPSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 2:17-cv-721 

 JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH 

 Magistrate Judge Vascura 

CHRISTOPHER J. BROWN, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 ORDER 

On August 21, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be 

denied and that he be granted thirty days to either pay the Court’s filing fee or submit the proper 

documentation. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 2). On September 5, 2017, Plaintiff 

paid the filing fee. Therefore, the August 21, 2017 Report and Recommendation is now moot. 

The Magistrate Judge then conducted an initial screen and issued a second Report and 

Recommendation, recommending that the Court dismiss this case pursuant to § 1915(e)(2) for 

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (See Report and Recommendation, 

Doc. 4). 

The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation. This 

matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. 

(See Doc. 7). The Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 

 
2 

 The objections present the same issues considered by the Magistrate Judge in the Report 

and Recommendation. Plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge’s dismissal of his case and 

continues to assert that Defendants conspired to violate his rights. However, he has not 

sufficiently pled a constitutional claim against them. Plaintiff’s Complaint still fails to state a 

claim for relief that is plausible on its face. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the Report and 

Recommendation, this Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections are without merit and are hereby 

OVERRULED. 

The Report and Recommendation, Document 4, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. 

The Clerk shall remove Documents 4 and 7 from the Court’s pending motions list. The 

Clerk shall terminate this case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
P.1 

OAR Box 1818 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

21) ll-C-18 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/6/2008 3:12:44 PM Sheet 21 of 79 
P.2 

JUL 2 I 

Honorable Bill Green, Ranking Minority Member 

House Appropriations 

Subcommittee on HUD-Independent Agencies 

1110 Longworth Building 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Green: 

In the Conference Committee Report for the 1987 fiscal year 

budget, the conferees reguested that the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) provide Congress with certain 

background information regarding the regulation of refueling 

emissions from motor vehicles, as detailed in the House 

Appropriations Committee Report. The House Appropriations 

Committee expressed concern that the Agency may not have 

developed sufficient data with which to properly assess the 

desirability of a nationwide refueling control program. As a 

conseguence, EPA was directed to: 1) review the need for and 

effectiveness of a nationwide refueling control program, 2) 

evaluate the costs and benefits of alternatives to assure a 

cost-effective strategy, 3) assure that reguirements of the 

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 301 or potential defect 

problems related to onboard controls are adeguately resolved, 

and 4) address the effects of fuel volatility on refueling 

controls. In addition, the House Appropriations Committee 

asked that information regarding the above issues and all of 

the rulemaking support materials be provided to Congress 

concurrently with EPA's submission of the proposal for Federal 

Register publication. 

I am pleased to provide our proposal to control refueling 

emissions and the regulatory support materials to Congress, as 

reguested (see enclosures). I would like to assure the members 

of Congress that the proposed action is the culmination of an 

intensive analysis to identify the most appropriate form for 
P.3 

controlling refueling emissions, and that all the concerns 

expressed by the Appropriations Committee have been carefully 

considered. As always, we will be carefully considering all 

comments received in the upcoming public comment period and 

public hearing before proceeding with further regulatory action 

in this area. 

Sincerely, 

(Original signed by L. M. Thomas) 

Lee M. Thomas 

Enclosure s
```

[Federal Register: October 26, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 207)]
[Notices]               
[Page 66281]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26oc11-42]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2010-OS-0034]

 
Defense Transportation Regulation, Part IV

AGENCY: United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM), Department 
of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Reference Federal Register Notice (FRN), Docket ID: DOD-2010-
OS-0034, published April 1, 2010 (75 FR 16445-16446) and subsequently 
revised April 5, 2011 (76 FR 18737). We have taken industry 
recommendations into consideration regarding the incorporation of local 
moves into the intrastate/interstate program. The Surface Deployment 
and Distribution Command (SDDC) is conducting a Direct Procurement 
Method (DPM) feasibility study to determine how local moves could be 
better managed to serve our DoD customers. Industry will be notified of 
any subsequent DoD decisions associated with the future of local moves. 
We thank our industry partners for their review and important 
suggestions to improve the Defense Personal Property Program (DP3).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jim Teague, United States 
Transportation Command, TCJ5/4-PI, 508 Scott Drive, Scott Air Force 
Base, IL 62225-5357; (618) 220-4803.

     Dated: October 21, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-27654 Filed 10-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 201O-NM-075-AD

Executive Order J 2866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES () explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Pmcedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES () explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to mclude specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where avi~tion might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES () explain NO (X)