alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
pspf_ex10m.htm


EXHIBIT 10(m)


 


AGREEMENT OF REPAYMENT


 


This Agreement of Repayment (the "AGREEMENT") is made and entered into in this __ day of May ___, 2010, by and between JUGGERNAUT FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC (“LENDER"), and Power Sports Factory, Inc. a Minnesota corporation ("BORROWER") (OTCBB: PSPF).


 


AGREEMENT:


 


This Agreement shall reflect the repayment of Three Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($3,300) by BORROWER to LENDER, to be applied to any outstanding principal in connection with the Loan and Stock Pledge Agreements dated May 25, 2010 between the above parties.


 


EXECUTED on the day and year first written above.


 




	 Juggernaut Financial Group, LLC 	 	 Power Sports Factory, Inc.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
By: 

	 	
By:

	 
	
Gabriel Klein, Managing Partner   

	 	
Shawn Landgraf, CEO
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Thinka  Weight  Loss  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Stacey Lauridia,  President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





/s/ Stacey Lauridia
---------------------------------
Stacey Lauridia
President/Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Brendan J. McGill, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

(1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m(a) or 78o(d); and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                              By: /s/ Brendan J. McGill
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Brendan J. McGill
                                                  Senior Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 12, 2004

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Harleysville Savings Financial
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.


                                   page -20-
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
August 7, 2013 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2013-4 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the
closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the
same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 25, 2016
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Joshua A. Rittenberry,

Plaintiff,

V. Case No. 2:17-cv-804

Officer Parneli, et al.. Judge Michaei H. Watson

Defendants. Magistrate Judge Vascura

ORDER

Plaintiff filed a complaint with jury demand but failed to pay the filing fee or

move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, prompting Magistrate Judge

Vascura to issue an Order and Notice of Deficiency, EOF No. 2. Plaintiff

responded to the Order by moving for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but

that motion was likewise deficient in that the affidavit in support of the motion was

unsigned, and the motion did not include the requisite certified copy of Plaintiffs

prison trust fund account statement. Magistrate Judge Vascura therefore issued

a second Order and Notice of Deficiency, EOF No. 4.

Both Orders warned Piaintiff that a failure to timely comply with the same

wouid resuit in dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. EOF Nos. 2, 4.

Still, Plaintiff failed to comply.

Thus, on November 2, 2017, Magistrate Judge Vascura issued a Report

and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending the Court dismiss Plaintiffs case

for faiiure to prosecute pursuant to Federai Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). R&R,
ECF No. 6. She recommended, however, that the Court dismiss the case

without prejudice and that the Court not assess the filing fee in this matter. Id. at

4. The R&R notified the parties of their right to object and specifically warned

that a failure to timely object would result in waiver of the right to de novo review

by the Undersigned as well as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the

Undersigned adopting the R&R. Id.

In response to the R&R, Plaintiff filed a notice stating that the prison

cashier refused to process his cashier statement and he was thus unable to

submit the required certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement due

to circumstances beyond his control. Notice, ECF No. 7. Plaintiff later submitted

a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement. ECF No. 8.

Plaintiff did not, however, submit a signed affidavit in support of his motion

for leave to proceed In forma pauperls, nor did he timely object to the R&R.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R, DISMISSES this case

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and DIRECTS the Clerk not to assess a filing fee in this

case. Finally, Plaintiff is ORDERED to list 2:17-cv-804 as a related case if he refiles this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4307 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in Artesia, New Mexico, as the 

‘‘Alejandro Renteria Ruiz Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4307 EH

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 

3 ARTESIA, NEW MEXICO. 

4 The Department of Veterans Affairs community5 based outpatient clinic in Artesia, New Mexico, shall, after 

6 the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act, be known and designated as the ‘‘Alejandro 

8 Renteria Ruiz Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

9 Any reference to such clinic in any law, regulation, map, 

10 document, record, or other paper of the United States 

11 shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Alejandro 

12 Renteria Ruiz Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 30, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4307 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs comment of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. Mexico, as the ‘‘Alejandro Renteria Ruiz Depart- munity-based outpatient clinic in Artesia, New
#### Johnny EDINGTON *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5258

418 S. W. 2d 637

Opinion delivered September 11, 1967

[Rehearing denied October 16, 1967.]

*Paul K. Roberts,*for appellant.

*Joe Purcell,*Attorney General; *Don Langston,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Johnny Edington was adjudged guilty of voluntary manslaughter. The first of two points advanced for reversal is that the court should have held appellant Edington’s “confession” inadmissible. The facts incident to this contention are brief.

Theodias Jimmy Turner died as a result of a knife wound received at the home of Gracie Broughton. Mrs. Broughton was taken to the police station in Fordyce for questioning. She disclosed that Edington was the only adult in the room with Turner at the time of the *11stabbing. An officer immediately located Edington at borne and in bed. Edington was not then aware the knife wound had proved fatal to Turner. When the officer and Edington walked into the room in City Hall, Mrs. Broughton advised Edington of Turner’s death and asked why he stabbed Turner. Edington responded that “he loved her” and was jealous of Turner. The officers did not instigate the conversation nor did they make any effort to stop it. They recounted the conversation in an in-chambers hearing. There the court held the conversation to be admissible.

Appellant argues that the recited testimony of the officers, should have been excluded under *Escobedo*v. *Illinois,*378 U. S. 478 (1964) and *Miranda*v. *Arizona,*384 U. S. 436 (1966). He insists that these decisions require the warnings in *Miranda*to be given at the moment a suspect is first taken into custody. This is not required in every instance of arrest or detention. The officer who went after Edington was merely instructed to bring him to headquarters. The officer did not interrogate Edington and consequently had no reason to give Edington the *Mircmda*warnings. Nor is this a situation where officers set up a conversation between the suspect and another in order to obtain an admission of guilt. The trial court heard evidence of a spontaneous admission by the suspect to his friend, Mrs. Broughton. The trial court correctly admitted the evidence. See *Turney*v. *State,*239 Ark. 851, 395 S. W. 2d 1 (1965).

Secondly, appellant urges that the eyewitness testimony of Mrs. Broughton’s eleven-year-old son constituted reversible error. The boy was in the fourth grade and had never failed in school. He attended Sunday School and named his teacher. He was questioned about the effect of an oath. His account of the incident of the stabbing was coherent. Rigid cross-examination failed to disturb him. The trial court, in its discretion, concluded that the boy met the oft-recited tests of understanding the obligations of an oath and had the ability to receive *12and transmit accnrate impressions of the events. *Batchelor*v. *State,*217 Ark. 340, 230 S. W. 2d 23 (1950).

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Resolve Staffing,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 1, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Cristino L. Perez, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Cristino L. Perez
--------------------------
Cristino L. Perez
Principal Executive Officer
August 4, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at June 30, 1999 and the Statement of Income
for the year ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          25,690
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,697
<PP&E>                                       1,589,519
<DEPRECIATION>                               (327,567)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,156,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          570,061
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,146
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,519,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,156,120
<SALES>                                        285,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               285,399
<CGS>                                        (106,595)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (594,993)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (628,673)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,044,862)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,044,862)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 33,767
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,011,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4017 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 43 Maple Avenue in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4017 EH

1 SECTION 1. ANN MARIE BLUTE POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 43 Maple Avenue in Shrewsbury, 

4 Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4017 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. bury, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute al Service located at 43 Maple Avenue in Shrews-
## Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Marcy Lena Mejia, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00208

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 336th District Court of
Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR

- 12

- 24230 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered

b y Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Marcy Lena Mejia, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 17, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Report of Syndication, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
      for
      the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Sorrentino, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








***/s/
      Brian Sorrentino***


Brian
      Sorrentino


Chief
      Executive Officer





May
      20,
      2008
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Daleen Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-89121) on Form S-8 of Daleen Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January
24, 2001 (except as to notes 2, 11 and 14, which are as of March 30, 2001),
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Daleen Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, redeemable preferred stock and stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2000, and the related financial statement schedule, which report
appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Daleen
Technologies, Inc.

Our report dated January 24, 2001 (except as to notes 2, 11 and 14, which are as
of March 30, 2001), contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has an accumulated
deficit of $81.7 million at December 31, 2000. These matters raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


                                             /s/ KPMG LLP


Miami, Florida

April 4, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED September 30,
2000.


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1550
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              363
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3316
<OTHER-SE>                                       (2129)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1550
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (363)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.000)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

SUBJECT: Memo to the Docket Determination of Failure to Attain by 2005 and 

Determination of Attainment by 2008 for the 1-Hour Ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards in the Baltimore Nonattainment Area 

in Maryland [EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0680]

FROM: Christopher Cripps, Project Officer /s/ January 31, 2012

Office of Air Program Planning

TO: File for Docket EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0680

THRU: Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director /s/

Office of Air Program Planning 

When the final Technical Support Document (TSD) for this action was signed on January 12, 

2012, the printed version inadvertently retained the header from the drafts “STAFF DRAFT 

**** PREDECISIONAL ***** January 9, 2012 **********************” on each page after 

the first page. The only differences made to the version dated January 12, 2012 to produce the 

version dated January 26, 2012 was re-printing with this header, resigning and dating with the 

January 26, 2012 date of resigning. No other changes were made.