alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS*

I,  Andrew  Hyder,  certify  that:

1.  I  have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Subjex Corporation;

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are  responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  known  to  us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of  a  date  within  90  days  prior  to the filing date of this
quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to record, process,
summarize  and  report  financial  data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were significant changes in internal
controls  or  in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent  to  the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions  with  regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

Date:  June 13 2003

                                   Andrew Hyder
                                -----------------
                                   [Signature]
                                CEO/CFO/Director


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Quintek  Technologies,  Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, I, Andrew Haag, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: November 14, 2005


/S/ ANDREW HAAG
--------------------
Andrew Haag
Chief Financial Officer
1

Ogulei, David

From: Nancy L Paddock [nancy.paddock@veoliaes.com]

Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:55 PM

To: Ogulei, David

Cc: Dennis J Warchol

Subject: Title V Permit Application - November 2013 clarifications

Attachments: z EGNE2 EUD-1rev4.pdf; A5 Form PTE Summary(2 of 2)rev4.pdf; Veolia Renewalrev4 

page57.pdf; Veolia Renewalrev4 page63.pdf; Veolia Renewalrev4 page65.pdf; Veolia 

Renewalrev4 page66.pdf; Veolia Renewalrev4 page78.pdf; Veolia Renewalrev4 page80.pdf; z 

EGEN1 EMSSrev4.pdf; z EGEN1 EUD-2rev4.pdf; z EGEN2 EMSSrev4.pdf; Veolia 

Renewalrev4 page73.pdf

Hello David, 

The August 2013 Addendum to Application for Renewal of a Major Source Operating Permit has been modified per our 

November 7th conversation; see attached files. The attached documents replace corresponding pages from the August 

2013 document. 

My summary of changes to aid the review process: 

1. A5 form PTE Summary now includes the two emergency generators. 

2. Page 57 adds the generators to our list of air emission sources. Emergency generators identified as < 112kW. 

3. Please replace page 63 of the original addendum with page 63 in the attached file. Content has NOT be 

changed, but some text has been re-arranged to keep the page numbers the same as in the August 2013 

Addendum document. 

4. Please replace page 65 of the original addendum with page 65 in the attached file. Content has NOT be 

changed, but some text has been re-arranged to keep the page numbers the same as in the August 2013 

Addendum document. 

5. Page 66 contains the emissions summary for the emergency generators. Emergency generators identified 

as < 112kW in text and table. 

6. Page 73 contains: Row 1 of boiler requirements - CEMS removed; monitoring and recording of tune-up data 

added. The contractor who performs our annual boiler tune-up is able to provide flow data and ppm readings for 

CO and NOx which will enable us to calculate emissions from the unit. 

7. Page 78 contains recordkeeping requirements for the emergency generators. 

8. Page 80 contains reporting requirements for the emergency generators. 

9. Gen1EMSS - self-explanatory 

10. Gen1EUD - identifies generator< 112kW 

11. Gen2EMSS - self-explanatory 

12. Gen2EUS - identifies generator< 112kW 

As agreed, we will be submitting a revised CTAC form with Doug's signature once we agree on all modifications. 

I hope this resolves all the issues we discussed. Please contact me if you need additional information. 

Thank you. 

Nancy Paddock 

Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618.271.2804 (x-115) 

618.271.2128 (fax) 

 

Nancy.Paddock@VeoliaES.com
2

www.VeoliaES.com

 

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 

contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 

you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 

original message and delete it from all computers.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 13.3

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of BE Semiconductor
Industries N.V. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Richard W. Blickman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  February 24, 2004                /s/ Richard W. Blickman
                                         -----------------------
                                         Richard W. Blickman
                                         Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00306]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Child Health and Human Development Council, January 11, 2022, 
12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.; January 12, 2022, 12:00 to 5:00 p.m., NIH, 
Building 31, 31 Center Drive, C-Wing, Conference Room 6, Bethesda, MD 
20894 which was published in the Federal Register on December 1, 2021, 
86 FR 228.
    The open session of the meeting on January 12, 2022, 12:00 p.m. to 
1:00 p.m. has been canceled. Closed session of the meeting will begin 
on January 12, 2022, 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00306 Filed 1-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Duncan v Hutzel Hospital,

No. 90637;

Court of Appeals No. 99109.
EXHIBIT 99.1

Environmental Oil Processing Technology Corporation (OTC: "EVOP") news release -
September 20, 2001.



ENVIRONMENTAL  OIL PROCESSING  TECHNOLOGY  CORPORATION  SUED BY FORMER OWNERS OF
SUBSIDIARY TO RESCIND ACQUISITION


Nampa,  Idaho,  September 20, 2001 -  Environmental  Oil  Processing  Technology
Corporation  (the "Company") (OTC Bulletin Board:  EVOP) announced today that it
had recently received notice that a civil action was filed on August 29, 2001 in
the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado by the former owners of the
Company's  wholly  owned  subsidiary,  Project  Development  Industries,  L.L.C.
("PDI"). The plaintiffs are seeking a judgment declaring that the Share Purchase
Agreement (the "Agreement")  entered into in August 1999 by the parties and that
resulted in the  Company's  acquisition  of PDI, was validly  rescinded and that
such Agreement is null and void, and as a result of such rescission  plaintiff's
be  restored  to their  original  position of  ownership  of PDI.  In  addition,
plaintiffs  are asking for  injunctive  relief  that the  Company  return to the
plaintiffs the ownership interests in PDI. The individual  plaintiffs  currently
own  approximately  7 million shares of common stock of the  Corporation and are
maintaining that they should retain ownership of such shares after the return of
the ownership  interest of PDI. The Corporation  has defenses and  counterclaims
available to it in this matter, which it intends to actively pursue.

In addition,  on August 28, 2001, the Corporation  received the resignation from
the Board of Directors of Mr. Grayson Evans,  Chief Executive Officer of PDI and
one of the individual plaintiffs in the civil action described above.

ENVIRONMENTAL OIL PROCESSING  TECHNOLOGY  CORPORATION,  with its headquarters in
Nampa, Idaho, has developed a process and facilities,  which virtually minimizes
waste oil disposal, as it is known today. Their plant utilizes proven technology
to convert  waste oil into  environmentally  friendly  products  such as naphtha
(gasoline),   #2  diesel,   electrical   power,   residuum   burner  fuel,   and
co-generation.

CONTACT: N. Tod Tripple of Environmental Oil Processing Technology  Corporation,
208-463-0063, fax 208-463-7601, or email,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EDWARD BELLMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:17crl62(4)

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION UNDER 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) (COMPASSIONATE RELEASE) (DOCS. #230, 233)

Upon motions of the defendant for a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) (Docs. #230, 233), IT IS ORDERED that the motions are DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE because the defendant has not exhausted all administrative remedies as required in

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), nor have 30 days lapsed since receipt of the defendant's request by

the warden of the defendant's facility.

July 20,2021 WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 3:17-cr-00162-WHR Doc #: 238 Filed: 07/21/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 864
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4238 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

930 39th Avenue in Greeley, Colorado, as the ‘‘W.D. Farr Post Office 

Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2009 

Ms. MARKEY of Colorado (for herself, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, 

Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, and Mr. 

PERLMUTTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 930 39th Avenue in Greeley, Colorado, as 

the ‘‘W.D. Farr Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. W.D. FARR POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 930 39th Avenue in Greeley, Col6 orado, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘W.D. Farr 

7 Post Office Building’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4238 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘W.D. Farr Post Office 

5 Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
May 16, 2005





Applebee's International, Inc.
4551 West 107th St.
Overland Park, KS  66207


Ladies and Gentlemen:

I refer to the  Registration  Statement of Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form S-8 to be filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission
for the purpose of registering under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Act"),  4,500,000  shares of the Company's  Common  Stock,  $.01 par value (the
"Common  Stock"),  to  be  issued  pursuant  to  the  terms  of  the  Applebee's
International,   Inc.   Employee   Stock   Purchase  Plan  and  the   Applebee's
International,  Inc.  Amended and Restated 1995 Equity Incentive Plan (together,
the "Plans").

I am  familiar  with the  proceedings  to date  with  respect  to such  proposed
issuance and have examined  such  records,  documents and matters of the law and
satisfied  myself as to such matters of fact as I have  considered  relevant for
the purposes of this opinion.

Based upon the foregoing,  it is my opinion that the 4,500,000  shares of Common
Stock to be issued under the Plans,  when issued and sold in accordance with the
Plans, will be legally issued,  fully paid and  non-assessable.  This opinion is
limited to the Delaware General Corporation Law.

I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5 to the  Registration
Statement and to the reference to me in the Registration  Statement.  My consent
shall not be deemed an admission  that I am an expert whose  consent is required
under Section 7 of the Act.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Rebecca R. Tilden

Rebecca R. Tilden
Vice President and General Counsel
#### People v Pennington,

No. 90634;

Court of Appeals No. 109681.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 10204 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LORENZO SALGADO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 52

- 1

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lorenzo Salgado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salgado h a s not filed a response , ha s completed the confinement portion of his sentence, and has been removed from the United States . We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 30, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-10204 Document: 00513213159 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2015No. 15

- 10204

2 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous,

see 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2 , and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum

Alanis , 483 F.3d 381, 382

- 83 (5th Cir. 2007)

. Case: 15-10204 Document: 00513213159 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/30/2015
Opinion issued October 18, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 19
- 00803
- CV

——————————— IN RE TYSON WRIGHT , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Tyson Wright, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to
vacate its July 8, 2019 denial of the motion for reconsideration of the September 26, 2018 ruling striking relator’s counteraffidavit concerning costs and medical

expenses. 1 Wrigh t has also filed a motion for emergency relief.

1 The underlying case is Jennifer Perry v. Tyson Wright , cause number 2017

- 32538, pending in the 127th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable R.K. Sandill presiding.2

We deny the petition. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.
#### Clarke *v.*Clarke.

4-6051

143 S. W. 2d 540

Opinion delivered October 7, 1940.

*Jay M. Bowlcmd,*for appellant.

*Curtis L. Bidgway,*for appellee.

GripfiN Smith, C. J.

The appeal presents two questions: (1) Was the evidence sufficient to sustain the decree. (2) Should alimony have been awarded. Appellee receives $60 a month as a Spanish American war pension allowance. Pending the determination of this appeal the pension bureau has remitted only $30 monthly to appellee, the balance to be paid either to the wife or the husband as equities may be determined by judgment of this court.

The parties were married in 1903 and have six children, all of whom are of age. The complaint alleges that *11separation occurred in 1934. In 1937 appellee (who had lived with his wife in Michigan) went to Florida and there filed snit for divorce. The action was dismissed on petition of the plaintiff, who in November of that year moved to Garland county. Appellant lives in Detroit and has a gross income of approximately $25 per week paid by three of her children who board and room with her.

The fact of separation, within the meaning of the seventh subdivision of § 2 of act 20 of 1939, is established by a preponderance of the evidence. If the husband and wife had “lived separate and apart . . . for three consecutive years without cohabitation” the husband’s statutory right to the decree accrued. *Jones*v. *Jones,*199 Ark. 1000, 137 S. W. 2d 238.

Act 20 provides that “. . . the question of who is the injured party shall be considered only in the settlement of the property rights of the parties and the question of alimony.” The trial court denied alimony. While it is difficult to determine who the injured party is, there seems to have been fault on both sides. In this state of the record the decree of divorce will be affirmed, but the cause will be remanded, with directions that the sum of $30 per month be paid appellant from November, 1939, until this decree becomes final, and thereafter the sum of $15 per month be paid.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  SUBSIDIARY NAME                                          STATE OF INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                        <C>
GMGP, Inc.                                                                         Georgia
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gift Mart Limited Partner, Inc                                                     Georgia
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LFGP, Inc.                                                                         Georgia
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. C. Holdings, Inc.                                                               Georgia
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMC Tampa, Inc.                                                                    Florida
=========================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3976 

To extend certain expiring provisions providing enhanced protections for 

servicemembers relating to mortgages and mortgage foreclosure. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. PERRIELLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend certain expiring provisions providing enhanced protections for servicemembers relating to mortgages and 

mortgage foreclosure. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Heroes Keep 

5 Their Homes Act of 2009’’. 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3976 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ENHANCED PROTECTIONS FOR 

2 SERVICEMEMBERS RELATING TO MORT3 GAGES AND MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE 

4 UNDER SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF 

5 ACT. 

6 Section 2203(c)(2) of the Housing and Economic Re7 cover Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-289) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and in9 serting ‘‘December 31, 2015’’; and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2011’’ and insert11 ing ‘‘January 1, 2016’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS