alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
      30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Russell M. Medford, President and Chief Executive Officer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/RUSSELL
              M. MEDFORDRussell
                M. MedfordPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  August
                9, 2007

















**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
      30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Mark P. Colonnese, Executive Vice President, Commercial
      Operations and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/MARK
              P. COLONNESEMark
                P. ColonneseExecutive
                Vice President, Commercial Operationsand
                Chief Financial OfficerDate:  August
                9, 2007
#### The City of Grand Rapids *v.*George A. Whittlesey.

*Cases made after judgment: Clerk’s certificate: Jurisdictional defects: ¡Stipulation of counsel.*Oases made after judgment are required by the statute *{Comp. L. 187ly*§ *4947)*to he certified to the supreme court by the clerk of the court below, and such certificate is essential to give the supreme court jurisdiction to hear the cause; and the want of such certificate, being a jurisdictional defect, cannot be cured by stipulation of counsel.

*Heard and decided June 10.*

Case made from Recorder’s Court of Grand Rapids.

This record purports to be a case made after judgment, but there is no certificate of the clerk of the court below authenticating the case filed here. The counsel for the respective parties have attempted to cure this by stipulation.

*J. W. Ransom,*for plaintiff.

*L. W. Wolcott,*for defendant.

The Coubt

held that under the statute cases made after judgment are required to be certified to this court by the clerk of the court below, and this certificate is essential to give jurisdiction to hear the cause: and that such defect cannot be cured by stipulation of counsel.

Case stricken from the docket.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 4, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50160

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR GUERRERO BOJORQUEZ CARDOZA, 

also known as Victor Cardoza Bojorquez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CR-134-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Victor Guerrero Bojorquez Cardoza appeals the sentence

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of

marijuana with intent to distribute. He argues that the district

court plainly erred in imposing his sentence pursuant to the then

mandatory United States Sentencing Guidelines, which were

subsequently held unconstitutional in United States v. Booker,

125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). 
No. 05-50160

-2-

Because he did not raise this issue in the district court,

review is limited to plain error. See United States v. Mares,

402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar.

31, 2005)(No. 04-9517). Under the plain-error standard of

review, “reversal is not required unless there is (1) an error;

(2) that is clear or plain; (3) that affects the defendant’s

substantial rights; and (4) that seriously affects the fairness,

integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id.

The imposition of Cardoza’s sentence under the mandatory

Guidelines was error that was plain. See United States v.

Martinez-Lugo, ___ F.3d ___, 2005 WL 1331282 at *2 (5th Cir. June

7, 2005) (No. 04-40478). However, Cardoza has not shown that the

error affected his substantial rights as he has not shown that

the district court would likely have imposed a lesser sentence

under an advisory Guidelines sentencing scheme. See United

States v. Bringier, 405 F.3d 310, 317 (5th Cir. 2005). In both

the instant case and Bringier, the district courts stated at

sentencing that the sentence was the lowest it could give. See

id. Therefore, he has not shown that the district court’s

imposition of his sentence under the mandatory Guidelines was

reversible plain error. See id. Accordingly, Cardoza’s sentence

is AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:17-CR-219

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

BRADLEY E. MALONE, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On October 31, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to an

Information charging him with accessing with intent to view child pornography, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). (Doc. 12). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear

on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free

from coercion, and had a basis in fact. Further, the Magistrate Judge observed that at the time

Defendant entered his guilty plea, he was in full possession of his faculties, was not suffering from

any apparent physical or mental illness, and was not under the influence of narcotics or alcohol.

Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of accessing

with intent to view child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

d0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

137434(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137434 COA: 286317 Wayne CC: 93-000581-FC LEWIS AARON NIXON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4366 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 

qualified motor vehicle taxes for motor homes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. DONNELLY of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the deduction for qualified motor vehicle taxes for motor 

homes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED 

4 MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (G) of section 

6 164(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend7 ed by inserting ‘‘(December 31, 2010, in the case of a 

8 motor home)’’ after ‘‘December 31, 2009’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4366 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to purchases after December 31, 

3 2009, in tax years ending after such date. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
STATE OF MARYLAND

SIP REVISION 15-05 Continuous Opacity and TM 90-01 Removal

TABLE OF CONTENTS Actions presented in reverse chronological order

1. Introduction Summary Support Document COMAR effective text in the Maryland SIP Revisions through #15-05

2. Final text, Amendments effective 8/22/11 COMAR 26.11.01.10 & .11 (Proposed Action April 22, 2011) 3. Technical Support Document 4. Public Hearing Notices 5. Maryland Department of the Environment Hearing Statement 6. Public Hearing Transcript 7. No Comments

8. Final text, Amendments effective 8/22/11 COMAR 26.11.01.10 & .11 (Proposed Action January 14, 2011) (NOT included with the SIP COMAR 26.11.09.01 & .05) 9. Technical Support Document 10. Public Hearing Notices 11. Maryland Department of the Environment Hearing Statement 12. Public Hearing Transcript 13. Comments 14. Response to Comments

15. Final text, Amendments effective 6/13/11 COMAR 26.11.31.01 - .12 16. Technical Support Document 17. Public Hearing Notices 18. Maryland Department of the Environment Hearing Statement 19. Public Hearing Transcript 20. No Comments

21. Final text, Amendments effective 5/17/10 COMAR 26.11.01.01, .05, .10 & .11 (NOT included with the SIP COMAR 26.11.09.01 & .05) 22. Comparison Table 23. Public Hearing Notices 24. Maryland Department of the Environment Hearing Statement 25. Public Hearing Transcript 26. Comments 27. Response to Comments
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

 

 Jason L. Stubbs , 

 Plaintiff, 

-vs- Case No. 1:17-CV-790 

 Paul Bryant et al, 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________ 

 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. 

The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered 

its verdict. 

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. 

The issues have been tried or heard and a decision 

has been rendered. 

 

 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 

That the Report and recommendation is hereby adopted and the plaintiff’s 

complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. This case is hereby terminated 

from the docket from this court. 

Date: June 15, 2018 Richard W. Nagel, CLERK 

 By:s/Benjamin J. Codispoti 

 Benjamin J. Codispoti, Deputy Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

John Charles Fortner,

Petitioner, Case No. 2:17-cr-243

V. Judge Michael H. Watson

United States of America, Magistrate Judge Deavers

Respondent.

ORDER

On October 19,2021, Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom this case was

referred, issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending the

Court deny Petitioner's motion, EOF No. 64, and dismiss the action with

prejudice. R&R, EOF No. 73.

The R&R notified the parties of their right to object to the recommendations

contained in the same and specifically advised the parties that a failure to timely

object would amount to a waiver of the right to de novo review by the

Undersigned as well as a waiver of the right to appeal a decision by the

Undersigned adopting the R&R. Id. at 8.

The deadline for objecting has passed, and none were filed. Accordingly,

the Court ADOPTS the R&R, DENIES Petitioner's motion, and DISMISSES

WITH PREJUDICE this action. Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability.

The Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal

Case: 2:17-cr-00243-MHW-EPD Doc #: 74 Filed: 11/15/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 344
would be objectively frivolous and, therefore, Petitioner should not be permitted to

proceed in forma pauperis.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate EOF Nos. 64 and 73.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case No. 2:16-cr-41 Page 2 of 2

Case: 2:17-cr-00243-MHW-EPD Doc #: 74 Filed: 11/15/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 345
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  report of Collectible  Concepts  Group,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Paul S. Lipschutz,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc.  and will be retained by
Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:   August 23, 2005                           By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Paul S. Lipschutz
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of United Shipping & Technology, Inc. on Form S-3/A (File No.
333-34411) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-06269) of our report dated August 13,
1999, except for Notes 2 and 15, as to which the date is September 9, 1999,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of United Shipping &
Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1999 and for the year then
ended, which report appears in this June 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB
of United Shipping & Technology, Inc.


                                      /s/ LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP


         Minneapolis, Minnesota
         September 28, 1999
No. 1014.

#### Gantt *v.*Gantt.

November Term, 1880.

Eawls and Gantt jointly purchased a tract of land from Jones and gave bond and mortgage for the purchase money, and each of them made payments. In July, 1873, Gantt had paid $269.15 over and above the half of the aggregated payments, with interest. Jones then agreed to compromise balance for $1200, of which Gantt paid $698 and Eawls paid $486 [error of $16 here unaccounted for], thus entitling Gantt to receive from Eawls on that day $375.15 to equalize their payments. (Eawls claims that he had at that time some other outstanding demands against Gantt, arising out of other transactions.) By direction of Gantt, and with consent of Eawls, the bond and mortgage were assigned by Jones to the wife of Gantt, and Mrs. Gantt after-wards brought this action for foreclosure. Held—

1. That the mortgage was not satisfied as against Eawls.

2. That the assignment would operate as a gift by Gantt to his wife of his interest in this mortgage valid between themselves, and binding upon Eawls, there being no creditors before the court.

3. That the assignee took the bond and mortgage subject to then existing equities of set-off in favor of Eawls against Gantt; but subsequent transactions between Eawls and Gantt could not be brought into the accounting in this action.

*611March 29th, 1881.

*II. A. Meetze, W. S. Monteith,*for appellant. *T. 8. Arthur,*contra.

4.That Mrs. Gantt not having appealed from the Circuit decree which fixed the amount due her at $698, with interest from the date of the assignment, that amount is assumed to be the extent of her claim, and should be paid out of the mortgaged premises with judgment against the defendants for any deficiency; but as between the defendants, each should be required to pay out of his interest in the land such sum as would equalize their payments, and adjust the equities existing between them. OpinioN by

Simpson, C. J.,
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Russell M. Medford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ RUSSELL M. MEDFORD
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Russell M. Medford
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 13, 2003

<PAGE>
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
P. Colonnese, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ MARK P. COLONNESE
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Mark P. Colonnese
                                        Senior Vice President of Finance and
                                        Administration and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
                                        August 13, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Syndication Net.com,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Brian Sorrentino, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   May 23, 2005

                                        /s/ Brian Sorrentino
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Brian Sorrentino
                                        Chief Executive Officer