T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T T E D A . O F F , S s g, U S A R e t i r e d, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. UN I TE D STATE S GOV ERNM ENT, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 17389 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 1 5 2 5 - K J D - LRL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da K e ntJ . D a w s on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 17, 2012 ** B e f o r e : L E A V Y , P A E Z , a n d B E A , C ir c u it J u d g e s . T e d A . O f

f ap p e a ls p r o s e f

r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is e m pl oy m e nta c t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de n o v o , a n d m a ya f

f irm o n a n yg r o u n d s u p p o rte d b yth e r e c o r d . T hom ps on v . P aul , 

# FI LED APR26 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 17389 2 5 4 7 F .3 d 1 0 5 5 , 1 0 5 8 - 5 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e a f f irm . D i sm i ssal o f O ff’ s w ro n g fu l t erm i n at i o n cl ai m s w as p ro p er b ecau se th ese c la im s a r e tim e - b a rr e d , a s O f f f ile d th is a c tio n o v e rth irte e n y e a r s a f te rh is te rm in a tio n s . See 28 U . S . C . § 2401( a ) ( pr ovi di ng tha t“ e ve ryc i vi l a c t i on com m ence d agai nstthe U ni t ed S t at es shal l be barr ed un l es s the com pl ai nti s f i l ed w i thi n si x years af

t erthe ri gh tof ac t i on fi rs tac crues” ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d O f f’ s c l a i m s unde rthe F a i rL abor S ta n d a r d s A c t ( “F L S A ” ) a n d P r iv a c yA c t a s tim e - b a rr e d . Se e D e nt v . C ox C om m c ’ ns L as V

egas , I nc . , 50 2 F . 3d 11 41 , 11 44 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( F L S A cl ai m s are s u b je c t to a t m o s t ath r e e - y e a rs ta tu te o f lim ita tio n s ) ; R o se v. U

ni ted Stat es , 905 F . 2d 1257, 1259 ( 9th C i r . 1990) ( “ T he P r i va c yA c tpr ovi de s atw o y e a rs t a tut e of l i m i t at i on , 5 U . S . C . § 5 52 a( g)(5), w hi ch com m ence s w hen the pers on kn ow s or has re as on t o k no w of the al l eged vi ol at i on . ”) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d O f f’ s due pr oc e s s c l a i m be c aus e he f a ile d to s p e c if

ya n yf e d e r a l o f f ic ia l a c tin g in a n in d iv id u a l c ap a c ityw h o a lle g e d ly v io la te d h is c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts . Se e C ons e j o de D e s arr ol lo E c onom i c o de Mex i cal i, A . C . v. U

ni ted States , 48 2 F . 3d 11 57 , 11 73 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) (B i v e ns c la im s f o ra lle g e d c o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n s m a yb e b r o u g h t a g a in s t f e d e r a l o f f ic ia ls i n the i ri ndi vi dua l c apa c i t i e s , nota ga i ns tthe U ni t e d S t a t e s w hi c h i s pr ot e c t e d by10- 17389 3 sovere i gn i m m un i ty) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d O f f’ s habe a s c orpus c l a i m be c aus e he f a ile d to a lle g e th a t h e is in c u s to d y . Se e, e . g. , 28 U . S . C . § 2254( a ) ( habe a s c orpus r e lie f m a yb e s o u g h t b y“ap e r s o n in c u s to d yp u r s u a n t to th e ju d g m e n t o f aS ta te court ”) . T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i d n o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n b y g ran t i n g th e U n i t ed S t at es’ m o tio n to e x te n d th e tim e to r e s p o n d to O f f’s c o m p la in t. Se e A hanc hi an v . X e non P i ctures , Inc. , 62 4 F . 3d 12 53 , 12 58 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( di sc ussi ng st andard of revi ew for e xt ensi on re qu es t s und erF ed. R . C i v. P . 6(b)). T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byde ny i ng O f f’ s m ot i on f

or r e c u s a l. Se e T

a y lo rv . R eg e n ts o

f th e U n iv . o f Ca l. , 99 3 F . 2d 71 0, 71 2-13 (9th C i r. 1993) ( pe rc ur i a m ) ( di s c us s i ng s t a nda r d of r e vi e w a nd not i ng tha ta dve r s e rul i ngs al on e are i nsuffi ci entt o d em on stra t e j ud i ci al bi as ). O ff’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. O f f’ s “ R e que s tf

orE xt e ns i on a nd S pe c i a l C ons i de r a t i on, ” f i l e d on J ul y21, 2011, i s de ni e d. AF F I RME D.