alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of 24 Hour Auction
  (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended May 31, 2004 as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, the undersigned, being
  the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that:

|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: September 17, 2004 | Signed: | /s/ Robin Lee                                          
|------------------------ | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Name:   | Robin Lee                                              
|                         | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer

---
17423

#### E. L. LONG MOTOR LINES, Inc., Fuller Motor Lines, Inc., Huckabee Transport Corp. and R. D. Nilson, doing business as Nilson Motor Express, Appellants, v. South Carolina Public Service Commission, Respondent.

(103 S. E. (2d) 762)

*69
      *Frank A. Graham, Jr., Esq.,*of Columbia, *for Appellants,*

*Messrs. T. C. Callison, Attorney General,*and *Irvine F. Belser, Assistant Attorney General,*of Columbia, *for Respondent,*

*74May 13, 1958.

PER CURIAM.

The order and decree of Honorable Steve C. Griffith, Presiding Judge, has 'been carefully considered in the light of the record and the exceptions. The issues presented by the exceptions were correctly decided by the lower Court. The exceptions are overruled and the order and decree of the lower Court is adopted as the judgment of this Court.

The appellants contend that the order of the respondent was fatally defective in that it did not contain any specific findings of fact. They assert that the respondent should have specifically made a finding that public convenience and necessity was not being reasonably served by the appellants. The exception posing this question cannot be considered for the reason that the appellants made no such claim in their petition for .a rehearing before the respondent, or in the complaint upon which this action is based. Since this ground of appellants is not responsive to the issues raised by the pleadings, it was not properly before the trial Judge and, therefore, is not properly before this Court. *Franklin Savings & Loan Co. v. Riddle,*216 S. C. 367, 57 S. E. (2d) 910; *Richardson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.,*221 S. C. 14, 68 S. E. (2d) 874; *Prosser v. Avery Lumber Co.,*162 S. C. 159, 160 S. E. 431; *Epworth Orphanage v. Long,*207 S. C. 384, 36 S. E. (2d) 37; *White v. Livingston,*231 S. C. 301, 311, 98 S. E. (2d) 534.

*75We agree with the Circuit Judge that it would be better practice for the Commission to make specific findings on the issues involved, even though there is no statute requiring any such findings in orders made by the Public Service Commission relative to certificates .of public convenience and necessity for motor carriers.

In *Gray v. Laurens Mills,*231 S. C. 488, 99 S. E. (2d) 36, 38, which was a Workmen’s Compensation case, we use language which is here appropriate. We quote:

“As pointed out in *Singleton v. Durham Laundry Co.,*213 N. C. 32, 195 S. E. 34, 35, the Commission should ‘make such specific and definite findings upon the evidence reported as will enable this court to determine whether the general finding or conclusion should stand, particularly when there are material facts at issue.’ ”

Judgment below affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  President  and Chief
Executive  Officer  and Sr.  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation, (the "Company"), herby certify that to the best
of my knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
ended June 30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed
original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to
the  registrant  and will be retained by it and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: April 1, 2005.              /s/ Michael Ward          /s/ James B. Smith
                                  --------------------      --------------------
                                  President and CEO         Sr. V.P. and CFO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-190

Judge Marbley

Raul Aviles-Ortiz 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 21) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: October 27, 2017 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 5, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 28, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 213 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2022-34, CP2022-41.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-28584 Filed 1-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134664 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

COMPLETE AUTO & TRUCK PARTS, INC., Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 134664 

 COA: 268485 

Genesee CC: 04-080445-CK 

CITY OF FLINT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
#### Borden *v.*Industrial Finance Company, Inc.

4-8628

214 S. W. 2d 363

Opinion delivered November 1, 1948.

*Johnson*& *Johnson,*for appellant.

*Byron Goodson*and *E. K. Edwards,*for appellee.

Ed F. McFaddin, Justice.

The validity of appellants ’ tax title is the issue. With becoming candor counsel for appellants say: “There is but one vital issue presented by this appeal. At the outset we agree that if *Lumsden*v. *Erstine,*205 Ark. 1004, 172 S. W. 2d 409, 147 A. L. R. 1132, is yet the law in this State, then this case must be affirmed. ’ ’

It is true that *Lumsden*v. *Erstine*was decided by a divided Court, but the case has been subsequently cited with approval in opinions to which there were no recorded dissents. *Lumsden*v. *Erstine*has become a rule of property, and we continue to adhere to the holding of that case.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT31.2**

I, Michael W.Nelson, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Click Commerce, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period of this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
| Date: August 15, 2005 |     | /s/ MICHAEL W. NELSON                                          |
|----------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| * *                   | * * | Michael W. Nelson* Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

28

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50802

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE AVELINO LUIS-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Flaco Luis,

also known as Jose Avelino Luis, also known as Joe Avelino

Luis, also known as Jose Luis,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-14-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Avelino

Luis-Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.2

                           AMENDMENT TO SALE AGREEMENT


This agreement dated May 20, 2010 amends a Patent Sale Agreement dated January
12, 2010 between Unseen Solar, Inc. and Edward Myers.

Paragraph 1.2 is changed in part to read;

1.2  SALE OF PATENT RIGHTS. Seller hereby sells, conveys, transfers, assigns and
     delivers to Buyer on the Effective Date, and Buyer hereby purchases and
     acquires from the Seller, all right, title, and interest in and to the
     Patent Rights, including, without limitation: (a) all right, title and
     interest in and to the patent(s) and patent application(s) listed in the
     table below and all future patents for this technology issued to Edward
     Myers (collectively, the "PATENTS"); and (b) all right, title and interest
     to sue and collect for past infringement of the Patents.

UNSEEN SOLAR, INC.



/s/ Edward F. Myers                               /s/ Edward Myers
------------------------------                    ------------------------------
Edward F. Myers                                   Edward Myers
President                                         Date: 5/20/10
Date: 5/20/10
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4151 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4151

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the Federal 
 medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the 
                    Medicaid Program to 75 percent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2009

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the Federal 
 medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the 
                    Medicaid Program to 75 percent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Medicaid 
Reimbursement Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING THE MEDICAID FEDERAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PERCENTAGE 
              FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO 75 PERCENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396d(b)(3)) is amended by striking ``70 percent'' and inserting 
``75 percent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to calendar quarters beginning on or after October 1, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
### Regulatory Evaluation Docket No. fAA- 

# \ 5

**-eE oo?**  **~0** Directorate Identifier: 

# -A.} O A cid !he work lw11rs. pa ri.\ cost. an d m t mh e r <?l C.S. regi. wer t •d pmd11c1s to tin· w bl e h e/ow. 

### When yo11 are 

### jin i shed. dick flll lhe "" 0/ }(/ate Fie ld'i ·· hullolllo

**autmnatku**

**l~ \·**  **fi /1**  i11 t lt e tola ls. 

### Update Fields ., Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g. , aircraft. engine, (e.g .. Inspection. propeller. appliance) Wor k
-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Tota l Cost rcplaccmem) (include cost (labor+ 

## u .s. l()r U.S . Fleet Do not inclucle on- condition costs here acce s s , testing. ( @ $85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Inspection to determine if placard if existing 0.5 $0.00 3000 is compliant with SB intent Order and install replacement 1.0 $40.00 3000 placard Order updated POll and install updated 0.5 $300.00 3000 pages

I lo



### The kn own num ber of pro duc ts in comoI iance: Unknown 

### Total Costs of comoliancc for U.S. fleet: $1,530.000 

### Costs covered under warranty (if/mown) 

# so 8

### On-Condition Costs :


# ~ Action Work -hours 

### Labo r cost Parts C ost Cost pe r Pr oduct (e.g., Inspection , ( in clude access, (@$85/hour) te sting, and close
replacement) up)


### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Cos t s table that was assumed o r might n ot he obvious. This field can al so be u sed to explain warr anty co s ts) : 

### Executive Order 12866: Could th e AD be considered a ..significant regulator y actio n" "? @ Y E S* 

### 0 NO 

### !81 *Explanat ion : 

### DOT Reg ul a tory Polici es and 

### Procedures: 

### I s the AD si g nificant? 

## @ Y I:: S * 

### 0 NO 

### !81 * Explanation: 

### Regul a t ory F l exi bility Ac t : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on 

### a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes o r No answer . • Y E S 

### 0 NO 

### !81 Explana t i o n: Will not have a significant impact dut: to low cost for compliance. 

### In t rastate Avi atio n in Alaska: This AD cou ld affect intra st ate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropr iate to include specific requireme nt s f o r aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 

# G YES* 0 

### NO 

### !81 *Explanation:



### 9
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
September 10, 2012 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2012-4 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                         |  | 
|                                     |  |                                         | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|                                     |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |