Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 751 

8For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the First 

Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and herby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

7208.36.0060, 7208.37.0030, 

7208.37.0060, 7208.38.0015, 

7208.38.0030, 7208.38.0090, 

7208.39.0015, 7208.39.0030, 

7208.39.0090, 7208.40.6030, 

7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000, 

7208.54.0000, 7208.90.0000, 

7210.70.3000, 7211.14.0030, 

7211.14.0090, 7211.19.1500, 

7211.19.2000, 7211.19.3000, 

7211.19.4500, 7211.19.6000, 

7211.19.7530, 7211.19.7560, 

7211.19.7590, 7225.11.0000, 

7225.19.0000, 7225.30.3050, 

7225.30.7000, 7225.40.7000, 

7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000, 

7226.11.9030, 7226.11.9060, 

7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000, 

7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, and 

7226.91.8000. Subject merchandise may 

also enter under subheadings 

7210.90.9000, 7211.90.0000, 

7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 

7212.50.0000, 7214.91.0015, 

7214.91.0060, 7214.91.0090, 

7214.99.0060, 7214.99.0075, 

7214.99.0090, 7215.90.5000, 

7226.99.0180, and 7228.60.6000. The 

HTSUS statistical categories and 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes 

only. The written description of the 

scope of the Order is dispositive.8

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of subsidization in the event 

of revocation of the Order and the 

countervailable subsidy rates likely to 

prevail if the Order were to be revoked, 

is provided in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the Order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the 

following net countervailable subsidy 

rates: 

Exporters or manufacturers 

Net 

countervailable 

subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (CNS) ....................................................................................................................................... 11.30 

Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. (Usiminas) ................................................................................................................. 11.09 

All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 11.20 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of return/destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and the 

terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218. 

Dated: December 29, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of the Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–00020 Filed 1–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–602–809, A–351–845, A–588–874, A–580– 

883, A–421–813, A–489–826, A–412–825] 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From Australia, Brazil, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, 

the Republic of Turkey, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of the 

Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited 

sunset reviews, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) orders on certain hot-rolled steel 

flat products (hot-rolled steel) from 

Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of 

Korea (Korea), the Netherlands, the 

Republic of Turkey (Turkey), and the 

United Kingdom would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping as indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Applicable January 6, 2022. 


TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
752 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 

1See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the 

Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the 

United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the 

Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 

2016), as amended, Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from Turkey: Notice of Court Decision Not 

in Harmony with the Amended Final Determination 

in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of 

Amended Final Determination, Amended 

Antidumping Duty Order, Notice of Revocation of 

Antidumping Duty Order in Part; and 

Discontinuation of the 2017–18 and 2018–19 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, in Part, 

85 FR 29399 (May 15, 2020) (AD Orders). 

2See Initiation Notice of Five-Year (Sunset) 

Reviews, 86 FR 48983 (September 1, 2021) 

(Initiation Notice). 

3See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Review Of Antidumping Duty 

Order On Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

from Australia: Notice of Intent to Participate in 

Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘FiveYear (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order 

on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated 

September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate 

in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of 

Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review 

of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from Australia’’ as amended to 

include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated 

September 16, 2021 and amended September 20, 

2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset 

Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year 

(‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil: 

Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ 

dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

from Brazil: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated 

September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to participate 

in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Brazil’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises 

LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and 

amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from Brazil: Notice of Intent to 

Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 

2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from Japan: Notice of Intent to Participate 

in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; 

‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First FiveYear Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan’’ as 

amended to include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), 

dated September 16, 2021 and amended September 

20, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from Japan: Notice of Intent to 

Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘HotRolled Steel Flat Products from Japan: Notice of 

Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated 

September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review 

of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: 

Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ 

dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent to 

Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of 

Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review 

of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from Korea’’ as amended to include 

SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 

2021 and amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘HotRolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of 

Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset 

Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year 

(‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 

Netherlands: Notice of Intent to Participate in 

Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘FiveYear (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order 

on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 

Netherlands: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated 

September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate 

in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

the Netherlands’’ as amended to include SSAB 

Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 

and amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands: Notice of 

Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated 

September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review 

of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Turkey: 

Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ 

dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) 

Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain HotRolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of 

Turkey: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated 

September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate 

in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Turkey’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises 

LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and 

amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from Turkey: Notice of Intent to 

Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 

2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from the United Kingdom: Notice of Intent 

to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 

16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from the United Kingdom: 

Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 

16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First 

Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty order 

on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the United 

Kingdom’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises 

LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and 

amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the United Kingdom: Notice of 

Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated 

September 16, 2021 (collectively, Notices of Intent 

to Participate). 4See Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Amendment to 

Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on HotRolled Steel Flat Products from Australia’’; 

‘‘Amendment to Notice of Intent to Participate in 

the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Brazil’’; ‘‘Amendment to notice of Intent to 

Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from Japan’’; ‘‘Amendment to Notice of 

Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review 

of the Antidumping Duty order on Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from Korea’’; ‘‘Amendment to Notice 

of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review 

of the Antidumping Duty order on Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the Netherlands’’; ‘‘Amendment 

to Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Fiveyear Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Turkey’’; 

‘‘Amendment to Notice of Intent to Participate in 

the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

the United Kingdom,’’ each dated September 20, 

2021. 

5Note that some domestic interested parties are 

not participating in every review. See countryspecific substantive responses for a specific list of 

the domestic interested parties participating in each 

county review. 6See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘HotRolled Steel Flat Products from Australia: 

Substantive Response of the Domestic Interested 

Parties to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of FiveYear (‘Sunset’) Reviews,’’ dated September 30, 

2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan: 

Substantive Response of the Domestic Interested 

Parties to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of FiveYear (‘Sunset’) Reviews,’’ dated September 30, 

2021; ‘‘First Five-years (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the 

Antidumping Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from Brazil: Domestic Industry’s 

Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated 

September 30, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’’) Review 

of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands: Domestic 

Industry Substantive Response,’’ dated September 

29, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from the United Kingdom: 

Domestic Industry Substantive Response,’’ dated 

September 29, 2021 (collectively, Domestic 

Interested Parties’ Substantive Responses). 

7See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on September 1, 2021,’’ dated October 21, 

2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Zachary Le Vene, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0056. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 1, 2021, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

sunset reviews of the AD orders on hotrolled steel from Australia, Brazil, 

Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, 

and the United Kingdom 1 pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act).2 In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) and (ii), 

Commerce received notices of intent to 

participate in these sunset reviews from 

California Steel Industries, Steel 

Dynamics, Inc., Nucor Corporation, 

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., and United States 

Steel Corporation (domestic interested 

parties) within 15 days after the date of 

publication of the Initiation Notice.3 On 

September 20, 2021, Commerce received 

a request to amend received notices to 

include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB) 

in the reviews.4 The domestic interested 

parties claimed interested party status 

under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as 

domestic producers of hot-rolled steel in 

the United States.5

Commerce received adequate 

substantive responses to the Initiation 

Notice from the domestic interested 

parties within the 30-day period 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).6

Commerce received no substantive 

responses from any respondent 

interested parties. 

On October 21, 2021, Commerce 

notified the U.S. International Trade 

Commission that it did not receive an 

adequate substantive response from 

respondent interested parties.7 As a 


TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 753 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Reviews of 

the Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain HotRolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, 

Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the 

Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset reviews of the AD Orders. 

Scope of the AD Orders 

The merchandise subject to the AD 

Orders is hot-rolled steel flat products. 

A full description of the scope of the AD 

Orders is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.8 The written 

description is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, including the likelihood 

of continuation or recurrence of 

dumping in the event of revocation and 

the magnitude of dumping margins 

likely to prevail if the orders were 

revoked. Parties can find a complete 

discussion of all issues raised in this 

review and the corresponding 

recommendations in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, which is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNotices/ListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Reviews 

Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(c) 

of the Act, Commerce determines that 

revocation of the AD Orders would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and the 

magnitude of the margins of dumping 

likely to prevail would be weightedaverage margins up to the following 

percentages: 

Country 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

Australia ...................................... 29.58 

Brazil ........................................... 34.28 

Japan .......................................... 11.70 

Korea .......................................... 11.10 

The Netherlands ......................... 3.73 

Turkey ......................................... 24.32 

United Kingdom .......................... 33.06 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: December 29, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Orders 

IV. History of the Orders 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

VII. Final Results of Expedited Sunset 

Reviews 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–00019 Filed 1–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

National Voluntary Laboratory 

Accreditation Program—Revisions to 

the Personal Body Armor Laboratory 

Accreditation Program 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The National Voluntary 

Laboratory Accreditation Program 

(NVLAP) announces approval of 

revisions to its Personal Body Armor 

Laboratory Accreditation Program (LAP) 

for accreditation of laboratories 

performing tests on ballistic- and stabresistant personal body armor. The 

program has been renamed as the Law 

Enforcement and Corrections 

Equipment LAP to better reflect the 

types of testing being performed within 

this accreditation program and to allow 

for future expansion of the program for 

testing of additional law enforcement 

and corrections equipment. 

DATES: Handbook 150–24, 2021 edition, 

is applicable 30 days after publication 

on the NVLAP website, https://

www.nist.gov/nvlap. 

ADDRESSES: Laboratories may obtain a 

copy of NIST Handbook 150–24, 

NVLAP Law Enforcement and 

Corrections Equipment, by visiting the 

NVLAP website at https://www.nist.gov/ 

nvlap or by sending a request to NVLAP 

by mail at NIST/NVLAP, 100 Bureau 

Drive, Stop 2140, Gaithersburg, MD 

20899–2140 or by email at nvlap@

nist.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Timothy Rasinski, Program Manager, 

NIST/NVLAP, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 

2140, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–2140, 

Phone: (301) 975–4016 or email: 

timothy.rasinski@nist.gov. Information 

regarding NVLAP and the accreditation 

process can be obtained from http://

www.nist.gov/nvlap. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST) administers NVLAP 

under regulations found in 15 CFR part 

285. NVLAP provides an unbiased 

third-party evaluation and recognition 

of laboratory performance, as well as 

expert technical assistance to upgrade 

that performance, by accrediting 

calibration and testing laboratories 

found competent to perform specific 

calibrations or tests. NVLAP is 

comprised of a set of LAPs which are 

established on the basis of requests and 

demonstrated need. Each LAP includes 

specific calibration and/or test 

standards and related methods and 

protocols assembled to satisfy the 

unique needs for accreditation in the 

field of calibration, field of testing, 

product or service. 

The NVLAP Personal Body Armor 

LAP was established in 2006 at the 

request of the U.S. Department of Justice 

(DOJ) National Institute of Justice (NIJ) 

Office of Science and Technology. The 

LAP was developed to accredit 

laboratories for body armor testing in 

support of the NIJ Compliance Testing 

Program (CTP). The LAP currently 

encompasses accreditation for ballisticresistant body armor testing, stabresistant body armor testing, and 

autoloading pistol testing. 

The Chief of NVLAP may approve 

modifications to a specific LAP when a 

request to modify the LAP is received. 

Modifications may include addition of 

tests, types of tests or standards that are 

directly relevant to the LAP. NVLAP 


TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE