alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND AUDITED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 FOR BERTHEL FISHER & COMPANY LEASING, INC., AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                    30,100
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,048,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (435,292)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,643,323
<PP&E>                                       2,298,794
<DEPRECIATION>                               (534,153)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,407,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          684,727
<BONDS>                                     14,369,969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,621,422
<COMMON>                                       301,060
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,300,143)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,407,964
<SALES>                                      2,856,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,856,291
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,370,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               415,052
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,743,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (672,202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (236,451)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (435,751)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (94,098)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (529,849)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.31)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Open Text Corporation (the Company) for
the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Shackleton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John ShackletonJohn Shackleton President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 13, 2007
Exhibit
4.59

    


    Power
of Attorney

    


    
      
        	
                Principal:

              	
                Junhong
      Chen

              
	
                ID
      No.:

              	
                350203750427403

              
	
                Address:

              	
                Room
      17, No.442 Siming South Road, Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian
      Province.

              
	 
      	 
      
	
                Agent:

              	
                Leilei
      Wang

              
	
                ID
      No.:

              	
                110102197304020437

              
	
                Address:

              	
                No.1001,
      Building 1, Xiao Yang Yi Bin Hutong, Dongcheng District,
      Beijing

              


      

    

    


    The
Principal, Junhong Chen, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, hereby
authorizes Mr. Wang Leilei to exercise all voting powers as a shareholder of
Xiamen Xinreli Scientific and
Technology Co., Ltd., (“Xinreli”) during the term of
this Power of Attorney, including not limited to acting as the authorized
representative to nominate and elect senior management officers such as
directors, general manager at shareholders’ meetings of Xinreli.

    


    Unless
consented by the board of directors of Simlife (Beijing) Science Co.,
Ltd., (“Simlife”)
the aforesaid authorization is irrevocable. The Principal also agrees that
Simlife is entitled to appoint a new agent to replace the original agent, and
will execute relevant documents and take all necessary actions to complete the
new appointment.

    


    The
Agent, with the authorization of the Principal, shall exercise shareholders’
voting powers of Xinreli with due diligence and care, and will act in accordance
with directions of the board of directors of Simlife.

    


    This
Power Attorney will come into effect on the day of execution and will expire
upon dissolution of Simlife.

    


    
      
        	
                /s/ Junhong Chen

              	
                 (Signature)

              	 
      
	
                Junhong
      Chen

              	 
      
	
                Date:
      June 29, 2009
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Tamara Reed

3:17-cv-304

Commissioner of Social Security

✔ Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner is ACCEPTED; Judgment in Plaintiff's favor; matter

REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for

further; case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

✔ Sharon L. Ovington

Remand

3/7/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

RONALD A. TOM,

Plaintiff,

V.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-858

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

Magistrate Judge Vascura

ORDER

This case is before theCourt toconsider theReport and Recommendation issued by the

Magistrate Judge on November 26,2018. The Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintift's

Statement of Errors beoverruled and thedecision of theCommissioner of Social Security be

affirmed. {See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 16). This matter is now before the Court on

PlaintifTs Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 16). The

Courtwill consider the matterde novo. See28 U.S.C. § 636(b)( 1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

Plaintiffs primaiyobjection is that the ALJ failed to properly account forall of the

credited mental health limitations. And that the Magistrate Judge believed that theALJ included

and adopted all ofDr. Miller's opinions. However, Plaintiffargues that "the Magistrate Judge

believed that there was noevidence of additional restrictions in place or attention and

concentration that the ALJ failed toaccount for in the residual functional capacity." (Doc. 16 at

2).
However, these objections present, once again, theissued presented toand carefully

considered bythe Magistrate Judge intheReport andRecommendation. Plaintiff has not

presented any new evidence or argument other than what was previously presented in his

Statement ofErrors. Plaintiffmerely disagrees with the ALJ and Magistrate Judge's conclusions.

Specifically with respect toDr. Miller's opinion, the Court agrees that the ALJ's Residual

Functional Capacity essentially adopted the functional limitations opined by Dr. Miller, towhom

the ALJ accorded significant weight.

TheCourt hascarefully considered PlaintifTs objections, butfinds thatthe decision ofthe

ALJ was supported by substantial evidence asacknowledged in detail in the Magistrate Judge's

Report andRecommendation. Therefore, for thereasons stated inthe well-reasoned Report and

Recommendation, thisCourt finds that Plaintiffs objections arewithout merit.

Based on the aforementioned andthedetailed Report and Recommendation, the Court

finds that Plaintiffs objections have been thoroughly considered and are hereby OVERRULED.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation, Document 16, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.

Plaintiffs Statement of Errors is hereby OVERRULED, and the decision of theCommissioner

of Social Security is AFFIRMED.

The Clerk shall remove Documents 16 and 17 from the Court's pending motions list, anti

enter final judgment in favor of Defendant, the Commissioner ofSocial Security.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Georse C. Smith

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Order entered October 5 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 01314 - CV ESTATE OF HOWARD GIL LIS THOMAS, DECEASED On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 10 - 00877 - 1



### O RDER Before the Court are appellant’s September 28, 2016 motion to abate appeal and remand to the trial court for consideration of an out

- of

- time motion for new trial and appellees ’ October 3, 2016 respons e to that motion. Appellant’s motion is DENIED
. On the Court’s own motion, this appeal is removed from submission on October 11, 2016 and is ABATED pending resolution of cause number 05

- 16

- 01161

- CV, Estate of Howard Gillis Thomas, an appeal from the tria l court’s order dismissing appellant’s statutory bill of review.
/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,903
<SECURITIES>                                    12,473
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                       989
<INVENTORY>                                      4,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,240
<PP&E>                                          11,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,944
<SALES>                                         32,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,927
<CGS>                                           16,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                       928
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Stephen Wong                     
|Stephen Wong                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: August 8, 2006
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.27


Lloyd Johnson Offer Letter Second Amendment


Dear Lloyd:
This letter (the “Agreement”) amends the employment offer letter from Diamond Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) to you dated August 17, 2008 as amended December 2008 (the “Offer Letter”), by replacing the severance provisions under the heading of “Other Benefits.”
The “Severance upon Termination without Cause” provisions under the heading of “Other Benefits” in your Offer Letter are deleted and replaced with the following provision. 
Severance upon Termination without Cause: In the event the Company terminates your employment without Cause, as defined below, and such termination is a “separation from service” (as defined in Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(h)) then you will be entitled to receive the termination benefits listed below. With respect to Section 409A, each payment is a separate payment and with respect to payments subject to Section 409A (as not qualifying for the exclusion under Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(b)(4)) they are intended to constitute separate payments for purposes of Treas. Reg. 1.409A-2(b)(2) made upon an involuntary termination from service and payable pursuant to Treas. Reg. 1.409A- 1(b)(9)(iii), to the maximum extent permitted by said provision, with any excess amount being regarded as subject to the distribution requirements of Section 409A, including, without limitation, the requirement that payment to you be delayed until six months after “separation from service” if you are then a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A.
		
	•
	Payment of 170% of your annual base salary, based on your annual base salary on the date of termination;


		
	•
	Acceleration of any stock options, restricted stock or other equity grant that would have otherwise vested in the 12 months following the date of termination; and


		
	•
	The Company will offer to you the ability to elect coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”) under the Company’s medical or dental plans as in effect immediately prior to the date of termination. If you elect timely continuation of coverage under COBRA, provided that you pay the amount required to continue coverage, the Company will maintain coverage for you and your dependents for up to the maximum period of time allowed under COBRA.


Except in respect of any severance benefits provided you under the Offer Letter, we agree no other changes are made to your Offer Letter.

1
        






Please acknowledge your agreement with the amendment by signing below and returning the original to me for filing with the Company’s records. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
DIAMOND FOODS, INC.
By: /s/ Linda B. Segre     
Linda B. Segre 
Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy and People Officer


Acknowledged and Agreed:
/s/ Lloyd Johnson     
Lloyd Johnson 
Date: September 24, 2015

2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Scott Kamsler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 7, 2006 | /s/ J. Scott Kamsler
                     J. Scott Kamsler Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### Everett H. Givens et al v. Honorable Dudley K. Woodward et al.

No. A-1584.

Decided February 18, 1948.

(208 S. W., (2d) Series, 363.)

*Kenneth R. Lwnikhn,*of Austin, for relator.

PER CURIAM.'

The record discloses that the order of the Court of Civil Appeals overruling the motion for. rehearing in this cause was made on December 29, 1947. 207 S. W. (2d) 234. The application for writ of error was filed in that court on January 29, 1948. By the method for computing time prescribed by Rule *%*this was thirty-one days after the overruling of the motion for rehearing. By Rule 468, formerly Article 1742 of the Revised Statutes, it is reequired that applications for writs of error shall be filed within thirty days after the overruling of the motion for rehearing. It has long been established that this Court acquires no jurisdiction to consider an application for *397writ of error filed more than thirty days after the overruling of the motion for rehearing by the Court of Civil Appeals. The question is not one of discretion, but of jurisdiction. Heney v. Davidson, 119 Texas 451, 32 S. W. (2d) 452; Ladd-Hannon Oil Corp. v. Tripplehorn, 118 Texas 195, 13 S. W. (2d) 666; Texas and Pacific Ry Co. v. Perkins, Com. App., 48 S. W. (2d) 249.

The application is accordingly dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered February 18, 1948.

No motion for rehearing filed.
Back to Contents

Exhibit 99.1

**Certification****Pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers  of Orchid BioSciences, Inc., (the “Company”), does hereby certify,  to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the “Form 10-Q”)  of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the  Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated: May      14, 2003 | /s/        GEORGE        POSTE                   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                     | GEORGE        POSTE, DVM, Ph.D.                  |
|                     | Chairman        of the Board                     |
|                     |                                             |
| Dated: May      14, 2003 | /s/        ANDREW        P.        SAVADELIS     |
|                     | ANDREW        P. SAVADELIS                       |
|                     | Senior        Vice President and Chief Financial |
|                     | Officer                                          |

A signed original  of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ELVIN TOLLIVER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1261

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed October 17, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Polk County; Mark F. Carpanini, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011); State v. King, 

426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); 

Doby v. State, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 

2d DCA 2009); Valdez-Garcia v. State, 965 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Shortridge 

v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2002); Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Budd v. State, 477 

So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); McMillan v. State, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); 
- 2 -

Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 

(Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Case: 2:17-cv-00846-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 1 of 8  PAGEID #: 17

Case: 2:17-cv-00846-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 2 of 8  PAGEID #: 18

Case: 2:17-cv-00846-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 3 of 8  PAGEID #: 19

Case: 2:17-cv-00846-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 4 of 8  PAGEID #: 20

Case: 2:17-cv-00846-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 5 of 8  PAGEID #: 21

Case: 2:17-cv-00846-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 6 of 8  PAGEID #: 22

Case: 2:17-cv-00846-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 7 of 8  PAGEID #: 23

Case: 2:17-cv-00846-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/28/17 Page: 8 of 8  PAGEID #: 24
TradeOn Inc.: Exhibit 10.17 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com











Exhibit 10.17 


Summary of Guaranty Contract 


Guaranty Contract (the “Contract”) entered into by and between Changzhou Wujin Best Cable Co., Ltd. and Wang Quanxin (the “Guarantors”) and Jiangsu Wujin Rural Commercial Bank Company limited by Shares (the “Creditor”)
on October 22, 2009


Main Contents:


Guaranty Contract Number: 321882009820101 The Guarantors undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for Changzhou Wujin ? Machinery and Electric Co., Ltd. (the “Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards the Creditor under the Loan
Agreement (reference no. 321882009020101) from the date of effectiveness of the debt by the Obligor and till two years after the maturity of that loan agreement and the amount secured is RMB 350,000. 


Guaranty Responsibility: the guaranty under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantors are obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including the creditor declares
the debt becomes mature in advance by the Creditor under the Loan Agreement or pursuant to law. 


Scope of Guaranty: the guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expense such as litigation cost, lawyer’s fee.


Guaranty period: the guaranty period is from the effective date of the Contract to two years after the expiration of the performance period under the Loan Agreement.