alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
November 6, 2013 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2013-5 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4374 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit for 

electricity produced from biomass, to provide credit rate parity under 

such credit, and to exclude certain unprocessed fuels from the cellulosic 

biofuel producer credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN (for herself and Mr. HERGER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the credit for electricity produced from biomass, to provide credit rate parity under such credit, and to exclude 

certain unprocessed fuels from the cellulosic biofuel producer credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Renewable Biomass 

5 Fairness Act’’. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4374 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDIT. 

2 Each of the following provisions of section 45(d) of 

3 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified 

4 facilities) is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2014’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘January 1, 2019’’: 

6 (1) Clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (2)(A) (re7 lating to closed-loop biomass facility). 

8 (2) Clauses (i)(I) and (ii) of paragraph (3)(A) 

9 (relating to open-loop biomass facility). 

10 SEC. 3. RATE PARITY FOR OPEN-LOOP AND CLOSED-LOOP 

11 BIOMASS FACILITIES UNDER THE RENEW12 ABLE RESOURCES TAX CREDIT. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 45(b)(4)(A) of the Inter14 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to credit rate) is 

15 amended by striking ‘‘(3),’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this section shall apply to electricity produced and sold 

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

19 SEC. 4. EXTENDED CREDIT PERIOD FOR CERTAIN OPEN20 LOOP BIOMASS FACILITIES. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (ii) of section 45(b)(4)(B) 

22 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik23 ing ‘‘5-year period’’ and inserting ‘‘10-year period’’. 

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

25 this section shall apply with respect to electricity produced 

26 and sold after December 31, 2009. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4374 IH

1 SEC. 5. EXCLUSION OF UNPROCESSED FUELS FROM THE 

2 CELLULOSIC BIOFUEL PRODUCER CREDIT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

4 40(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

5 by adding at the end the following new clause: 

6 ‘‘(iii) EXCLUSION OF UNPROCESSED

7 FUELS.—The term ‘cellulosic biofuel’ shall 

8 not include any fuel if— 

9 ‘‘(I) more than 4 percent of such 

10 fuel (determined by weight) is any 

11 combination of water and sediment, or 

12 ‘‘(II) the ash content of such fuel 

13 is more than 1 percent (determined by 

14 weight).’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 this section shall apply to fuels sold or used after the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF CASTLE & COOKE, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                STATE OF
     NAME                                                     INCORPORATION
     ----                                                     -------------
     <S>                                                      <C>
     C & C Mountaingate, Inc.                                    California
     Castle & Cooke Arizona, Inc.                                Arizona
     Castle & Cooke Aviation, Inc.                               Hawaii
     Castle & Cooke California, Inc.                             California
     Castle & Cooke Commercial - CA, Inc.                        California
     Castle & Cooke Commercial Properties, LLC                   Hawaii
     Castle & Cooke Homes Hawaii, Inc.                           Hawaii
     Castle & Cooke Kunia, Inc.                                  Hawaii
     Castle & Cooke North American Commercial, Inc.              California
     Castle & Cooke North American Commercial, L.P.              California
     Castle & Cooke Outlet Centers, LLC                          California
     Castle & Cooke Properties, Inc.                             Hawaii
     Castle & Cooke Retail, Inc.                                 California
     CCC/GBI Keene's Pointe, L.P.                                Delaware
     Kunia Residential Partners                                  Hawaii
     Lanai Builders, Inc.                                        Hawaii
     Lanai Company, Inc.                                         Hawaii
     Lanai Holdings, Inc.                                        Hawaii
     Lanai Transportation Company, Inc.                          Hawaii
     Lanai Water Company, Inc.                                   Hawaii
     Oceanic Insurance, Inc.                                     Hawaii
     Pueblo del Sol Water Company                                Arizona
     Stockdale Coffee Company                                    California
     Seven Oaks Country Club                                     California

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 20-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF LANA L. RUPPRECHT FOR

ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF

MONTANA

Fr L

c10E30,

AUG 1 8 2020

C.,,,,tenwood

Ittof Sqprerna Court

iDWeF9 ontana

Lana L. Rupprecht has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of

Montana pursuant to Rule V of the 'Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the

Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Rupprecht has provided the

necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on

motion under Rule V. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and

completion of any other processing requirernents as set foith by the Bar Admissions

Administrator, Lana L. Rupprecht may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk

of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this f r"day of August, 2020.

Chief Justice

08/18/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005
-1 A4

Justices.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 31909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7900]

The Designation of Abdallah Azzam Brigades, Also Known as 
Abdullah Azzam Brigades, Also Known as Ziyad al-Jarrah Battalions of 
the Abdullah Azzam Brigades, Also Known as Yusuf al-'Uyayri Battalions 
of the Abdullah Azzam Brigades as a Foreign Terrorist Organization 
Pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, I conclude that there is a sufficient factual basis to 
find that the relevant circumstances described in section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (hereinafter ``INA'') (8 
U.S.C. 1189), exist with respect to Abdallah Azzam Brigades, and also 
known as Abdullah Azzam Brigades, also known as Ziyad al-Jarrah 
Battalions of the Abdullah Azzam Brigades, also known as Yusuf al-
'Uyayri Battalions of the Abdullah Azzam Brigades.
    Therefore, I hereby designate the aforementioned organization and 
its aliases as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 
of the INA.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 8, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-13106 Filed 5-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 1 of 13  PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 2 of 13  PAGEID #: 2

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 3 of 13  PAGEID #: 3

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 4 of 13  PAGEID #: 4

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 5 of 13  PAGEID #: 5

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 6 of 13  PAGEID #: 6

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 7 of 13  PAGEID #: 7

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 8 of 13  PAGEID #: 8

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 9 of 13  PAGEID #: 9

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 10 of 13  PAGEID #: 10

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 11 of 13  PAGEID #: 11

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 12 of 13  PAGEID #: 12

Case: 2:17-mj-00742-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 13 of 13  PAGEID #: 13
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 63

      ( print page 22116)    

### CFR Correction

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 63, §§ 63.1 to 63.599, revised as of July 1, 2014, on page 478, in § 63.343, paragraph (c)(5)(ii) is correctly revised to read as follows:

§ 63.343 

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(5) * * *

(ii) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is required to be completed under § 63.7, the owner or operator of an affected source shall monitor the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath. Operation of the affected source at a surface tension greater than the value established during the performance test, or greater than 40 dynes/cm, as measured by a stalagmometer, or 33 dynes/cm, as measured by a tensiometer, if the owner or operator is using this value in accordance with paragraph (c)(5)(i) of this section, shall constitute noncompliance with the standards. The surface tension shall be monitored according to the following schedule:

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2015-09202 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-P
---

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of 24 Hour Auction
  (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended February 28, 2003 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, the undersigned, being
  the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that:

|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: September 17, 2004 | Signed: | /s/ Robin Lee                                          
|------------------------ | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Name:   | Robin Lee                                              
|                         | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4246 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4246

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the alternative 
         fuels credit for liquified petroleum gas through 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2009

   Mr. Walz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the alternative 
         fuels credit for liquified petroleum gas through 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALTERNATIVE FUELS CREDIT FOR LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS 
              EXTENDED THROUGH 2010.

    (a) Alternative Fuel Credit.--Paragraph (5) of section 6426(d) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``December 
31, 2010, in the case of any sale or use involving liquified petroleum 
gas and'' before ``September 30, 2014''.
    (b) Alternative Fuel Mixture Credit.--Paragraph (3) of section 
6426(e) of such Code is amended by inserting ``December 31, 2010, in 
the case of any sale or use involving liquified petroleum gas and'' 
before ``September 30, 2014''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Martha A. Castellon-Vogel, :

:

Plaintiff(s), :

: Case Number: 1:17cv645

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

International Paper Company, :

:

Defendant(s). :

ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States

District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen

L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this

Court on July 18, 2018 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed

objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) and defendant filed a response to the objections

(Doc. 29).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de

novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that

such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and TERMINATED

on the docket of this Court.

Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 9) is DENIED as MOOT.

Defendant’s motion to strike (Doc. 16) and motion for judgment on the pleadings on its

counterclaim (Doc. 17) is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

KEVIN A. TOLLIVER, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 2:17-cv-806 

 JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH 

 Magistrate Judge Jolson 

REGIONAL DIRECTOR 

ROBERT JEFFRIES, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 ORDER 

On January 28, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed as duplicative. (See Report and 

Recommendation, Doc. 17). The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and 

Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. This matter is now before the 

Court on Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation and Order. (See Doc. 18). The 

Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 

 In Plaintiff’s Objections, he asserts that he “objects to dismissal of the 2017 complaint, only 

to the extent that Defendant’s may claim some technicality of procedure to a part thereof (e.g. 

exhaustion of state remedy, statute of limitations, etc.) as to joined issues.” (Doc. 18 at 1). He also 

notes that he has been denied appoint of counsel and is not sure how dismissal could prejudice his 

claims. Plaintiff also seems to acknowledge that this matter would be resolved more efficiently all 

in one case. 
2 

 The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s arguments and his objections; however, the 

Court agrees with the reasoning set forth by the Magistrate Judge in her Order. The Court agrees 

that Plaintiff is not entitled to appointment of counsel. Further, the Court also agrees that Plaintiff 

has filed two nearly identical lawsuits in this Court and does not have the right to maintain both 

cases. The prior case, Tolliver v. Nobel, et al, No. 2:16-cv-1020 (S.D. Ohio 2016), contains an 

Amended Complaint that has the same claims asserted in this case. “Plaintiffs generally have no 

right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time in the 

same court and against the same defendants.” Belser v. Washington, No. 1:16-CV-1205, 2016 WL 

6275343, at *1 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 27, 2016), aff’d sub nom. Belser v. Washington, No. 16-2634, 

2017 WL 5664908 (6th Cir. Sept. 13, 2017) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 

“Accordingly, as part of its inherent power to administer its docket, a district court may dismiss a 

suit that is duplicative of another federal court suit.” Id. (citation and internal quotation marks 

omitted). 

 Therefore, for the reasons stated in detail in the Report and Recommendation, this Court 

finds that Plaintiff’s objections are without merit and are hereby OVERRULED. 

The Report and Recommendation, Document 17, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 

Plaintiff’s Complaint in this case is hereby dismissed as duplicative of the aforementioned 2016 

case. Plaintiff can pursue all his claims in the 2016 case. 

The Clerk shall remove Documents 17 and 18 from the Court’s pending motions list. The 

Clerk shall close this case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-1- 

### STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

FLOYD KEMP,

Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 6, 2017

v No. 330968
Osceola Circuit Court TRACY ALLEN, doing business as QUALITY PAINTING & POWER WASHING, LC No. 15-014208-CK

Defendant,

and

PIONEER STATE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: B ECKERING , P.J., and M ARKEY and S HAPIRO , JJ.

MARKEY, J. (concurring).

I concur in result only.

/s/ Jane E. Markey
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 1 of 14 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 2 of 14 PAGEID #: 2
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 3 of 14 PAGEID #: 3
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 4 of 14 PAGEID #: 4
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 5 of 14 PAGEID #: 5
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 6 of 14 PAGEID #: 6
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 7 of 14 PAGEID #: 7
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 8 of 14 PAGEID #: 8
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 9 of 14 PAGEID #: 9
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 10 of 14 PAGEID #: 10
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 11 of 14 PAGEID #: 11
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 12 of 14 PAGEID #: 12
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 13 of 14 PAGEID #: 13
Case: 1:17-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/22/17 Page: 14 of 14 PAGEID #: 14