alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 2957.

#### Ussery *v.*Vogel.

April Term, 1892.

In this action, the “Case” for the appeal was settled on December 28, 1891. Sometime afterwards the appellant’s attorney, residing in Barnwell, S. C., gave his “Case” and points and authorities to a representative of a Columbia printing house, with instructions to have the same printed by May 20, and to have the necessary copies filed. The papers were put into the hands of the printer and were printed by him and retained under notice from *604such representative that he would call for them on Saturday, May 21. They were not so called for, and on Sunday or Monday the printer received a postal card from this person, directing him to file the papers on Saturday ; but that day having already passed, he held the papers until called for by appellant’s attorney on his arrival in Columbia on Tuesday night. The “Case” and points were thereupon filed on Wednesday, May 25. On the call of. the cause for hearing on the 27th of May, respondent’s counsel moved to dismiss the appeal, because these papers had not been on file for three days.

*Robert Aldrich,*for motion. *J. E. Davis,*contra.

The court, in delivering its judgment, said: The motion having been made, the court is obliged to grant the same, however reluctant so to do. In at least two cases of this kind at the last term of this court 1 this court has dismissed the appeals on similar grounds, and it would not be right, nor can the counsel expect the court, to grant relief in one case and not in another. Rule 8 reads : “Three days previous to the commencement of the argument of any caso, the counsel for the appellant shall deliver to the clerk of the court.” etc. This rule is imperative, and, as stated, has been construed several times by this court.

Thereupon the court passed the following order, prepared by counsel, May 27, 1892 : It appearing to the court that the case upon which the appeal herein was to be heard, was settled on the 28th day of December, 1891, and that the printed “Case” and appellant’s points and authorities were not filed in this court, nor served upon respondent’s attorneys three days before the case is called for trial, on motion of Robert Aldrich, Esq., attorney for respondent, it is ordered that the appeal herein be, and the same is hereby, dismissed with costs.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of First American Scientific Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, John Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 28th day of September, 2006.



| | JOHN BRIAN NICHOLS     
| | -----------------------
| | John Brian Nichols     
| | Chief Executive Officer













---
List of Appendices

Figures Questions 2, 4, 11 and 13

Appendix A 2005 NPDES Permit Renewal Application Questions 3 and 9 Appendix B 2010 NPDES Permit Renewal Application Questions 3 and 9 Appendix C Ash Pond Storage Volume Documents Question 3 Appendix D Waste Streams Flow Diagrams Question 7 Appendix E Discharge Monitoring Reports for 2005 – May 2010 Questions 7 and 9 Appendix F Coal Ash Analyses Questions 7 and 8 Appendix G FGD WWT Filter Cake Analyses Questions 7 and 8 Appendix H Gypsum Analyses Questions 7 and 8 Appendix I Asheville Constructed Wetlands Treatment System- O&M Manual Question 9 Appendix J NPDES Permit No. NC0000396 Question 9 Appendix K Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Question 10 Appendix L Groundwater Analytical Data and Well Construction Records Question 11 Appendix M Seepage Flow Measurements 2005-2010 Question 13 Appendix N Subsurface Investigation and Slope Stability Analysis of 1964 Ash

Basin Dike Question 13 Appendix O Slope Stability Models Question 17 Appendix P Inundation Maps Question 17 Appendix Q Waste Manifests Table 3 and Question 17Figures

Questions 2, 4, 11 and 13
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28438]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-335, OMB Control No. 3235-0381]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Form 40-F

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form 40-F (17 CFR 249.240f) is used by certain Canadian issuers to 
register a class of securities pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'')(15 U.S.C. 78l) or as 
an annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act 
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)). The information required in the Form 40-F 
is used by investors in making investment decisions with respect to the 
securities of such Canadian companies. We estimate that Form 40-F takes 
approximately 431.42 hours per response and is filed by approximately 
132 respondents. We estimate that 25% of the 431.42 hours per response 
(107.855 hours) is prepared by the issuer for a total reporting burden 
of 14,237 (107.855 hours per response x 132 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom, 
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, 
c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by sending 
an email to: [email protected].

    Dated: December 28, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-28438 Filed 12-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
EX-10.01






June 3, 2010



Jean C. Benson


MoneyGram International, Inc.



Dear Jean:



On behalf of MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. (“MoneyGram”), thank you for your continued commitment
to MoneyGram. In recognition of this commitment and our hope that you will continue to apply your
knowledge and skills at MoneyGram, we would like to offer you a Retention Bonus. This letter
outlines our offer of a Retention Bonus and will serve as a formal agreement (“Agreement”) between
you and MoneyGram.



Your commitment would be to:




	 	•	 	Continue to perform your assigned responsibilities at a performance level consistent
with your past performance and in furtherance of the objectives established for your
responsibilities; and






	 	•	 	Comply with all applicable MoneyGram policies, practices and procedures that apply to
all employees.





Subject to the conditions outlined in this letter, our consideration for your commitment will be a
Retention Bonus of $50,000 (less applicable taxes and withholdings) payable within 10 business days
following March 31, 2011. Should you resign your employment or be terminated for cause at any time
on or before March 31, 2011, you will not receive any portion of the Retention Bonus. Should your
employment terminate for any other reason on or before March 31, 2011, you will receive the
Retention Bonus



Except as explicitly stated in this Agreement, all other terms and conditions of your employment,
including but not limited to your status as an at-will employee, remain the same. The terms of
this Agreement may not be waived or modified except in writing signed by both you and MoneyGram.



Sincerely,



/s/ Karen Tooker

Karen Tooker

VP Executive Compensation, Benefits &



Corporate Services



Please indicate your acceptance and understanding of this offer by returning a signed copy of
this letter to me.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Accepted by:
	 	/s/ Jean C. Benson

	 	Date: 6/4/10
	 	 	 

	 	 
	 	 	Jean C. Benson
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
April 12, 2012 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2012-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the
closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     |  |                                 |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |  |                                 |  | 
|                                     |  |                                 | 
|By:                                  |  | /s/ Connie Coffey               |  |  |  | Dated: March 28, 2014
|                                     |  | Connie Coffey                   |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Executive Vice President,       |  |  |  |                      
|                                     |  | Accounting Corporate Controller |  |  |  |
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**RULE
      13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
      AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Eugene Science, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jae
      Hong Yoo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule
      13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
      1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November
              20, 2006
            
            /s/ Jae
              Hong
              YooJae
                Hong YooChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)




This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall
      not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 2000

 2500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134530 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134530 

 COA: 269692 

Oakland CC: 2006-206405-FH 

DANIEL ANTHONY AMARO,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
Case: 3:17-cv-00314-WHR Doc #: 30-1 Filed: 12/05/17 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 366

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION (CINCINNATI)

MARY MASON, et al., on behalf of : Case No. 3:17-cv-314
themselves and all other similarly-situated,
: Judge Walter Herbert Rice
Plaintiffs, : Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

vs. : [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ONE-DAY
SYNCHRONY BANK, : EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
: DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS REPLY
Defendant. : MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS

: MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
AND TO DISMISS, OR
ALTERNATIVELY, TO STAY THE
PROCEEDINGS

This matter comes before this Court upon the Unopposed Motion For One-Day Extension
Of Time For Defendant To File Its Reply Memorandum In Support Of Its Motion To Compel
Arbitration And To Dismiss, Or Alternatively, To Stay The Proceedings. For the reasons stated
in the Motion, and for good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED
that Synchrony Bank’s reply deadline is extended from December 14, 2017 until December 15;,
2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Loko,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DMS/10719454v.1
0372

#### Ralph L. HUTCHINS, Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD; DIVISION OF GENERAL SERVICES, Respondent.

(327 S. E. (2d) 353)

Court of Appeals

*486*Timothy G. Quinn,*of *Ellison, Quinn & Connor,*Columbia, *for appellant.*

*Craig K. Davis*and *Malcolm E. Rentz,*Columbia, *for respondent.*

Heard Nov. 15, 1984.

Decided Jan. 21, 1985.

Gardner, Judge:

Ralph L. Hutchins (Hutchins) brought this action pertaining to his employment with the Division of General Services of the South Carolina Budget and Control Board (Division) seeking certain relief relative to his employment with the Division. The trial judge sustained a demurrer to the petition. We disagree and reverse.

Hutchins' petition alleges, *inter alia,*that (1) he was discharged from employment by the Division on November 30, 1981, (2) on December 8,1981, he sought a conference with his immediate supervisor as the first step required in the administrative procedure prior to appealing an adverse decision to the State Employee Grievance Committee as provided by Title 8, Chapter 17, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), (3) by hand-delivered letter of December 11, 1981, he was advised that the conference with his immediate supervisor was set for that afternoon, December 11, 1981, or the following Monday, December 14, 1981, (4) his attorney was involved in the trial of a case in Marion, S. C. on December 11, 1981, and requested an extension of time for the conference until the next Tuesday, which was granted, (5) when it appeared that his attorney would be unable to meet the Tuesday date for *487the conference, his attorney requested that the conference be postponed until the next day, Wednesday, December 16,1981, and (6) thereupon, the attorney for the Division notified him that because the conference with his immediate supervisor was not held by December 11,1981, (within three days after written notice that he intended to exert his rights as a state employee), he was barred from his right of appeal1 to the State Employee Grievance Committee. The prayer of the petition sought, *inter alia,*an order requiring Hutchins’ immediate supervisor to proceed with the grievance procedure.

The trial judge sustained the demurrer on the grounds that the petition failed to state a cause of action because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The sole question, then, is whether the trial court erred by so ruling.

This is an action involving a statutory right of Hutchins arising from his employment contract with the State. Contract actions are not within the purview of suits proscribed by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. *Kinsey v. S. C. Dept. of Mental Health,*272 S. C. 168, 249 S. E. (2d) 900 (1978).

For the reasons given, the appealed order is reversed.

Reversed.

Sanders, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.

1

 This right of appeal is prescribed by Section B-17-40.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 22-01]


CCMA, LLC, Complainant v. Safmarine, Inc. and Ports America 
Chesapeake, LLC, Respondents; Notice of Filing of Complaint and 
Assignment

    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (Commission) by CCMA, LLC, hereinafter 
``Complainant,'' against Safmarine, Inc. and Ports America Chesapeake, 
LLC, hereinafter ``Respondents.'' Complainant is a Delaware corporation 
that purchased containers of high carbon ferro for shipment to 
Baltimore. Complainant alleges that Respondent Safmarine, Inc. is a 
Delaware corporation and common carrier, and that Respondent Ports 
America Chesapeake, LLC is a Delaware corporation and a marine terminal 
operator.
    Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) 
and 46 CFR 545.4 and 545.5 with regard to assessing demurrage charges 
against shipments that are subject to a governmental hold for 
examination by Customs, and therefore, unavailable for pick-up. The 
full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic 
Reading Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/22-01/.
    This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law 
Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding 
shall be issued by January 5, 2023, and the final decision of the 
Commission shall be issued by July 19, 2023.

William Cody,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00249 Filed 1-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 432-433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28551]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-438-000.
    Applicants: ETC Tiger Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: NRA Amendment No 2--Chesapeake 
to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/28/21.
    Accession Number: 20211228-5081.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-439-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Various 
Releases eff 1-1-2022 to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20211229-5033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-440-000.

[[Page 433]]

    Applicants: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Northern 
Utilities 210363 Release eff 1-1-2022 to be effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 12/29/21.
    Accession Number: 20211229-5043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/10/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 29, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-28551 Filed 1-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P