Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices 22165 

5See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 

6See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

7See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

8See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

9See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

10See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 

6041, 6042 (February 4, 2015). 

11For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

1See Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014, 80 FR 4537 (January 28, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary 

Continued 

failure to provide evidence that the 

subject merchandise was resold at a 

profit. Because the non-bona fide sale 

was the only reported sale of subject 

merchandise during the POR, and thus 

there are no reviewable transactions on 

this record, we are preliminarily 

rescinding the instant administrative 

review. See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Because much of the factual information 

used in our analysis of DMEGC’s sale 

involves business proprietary 

information, a full discussion of the 

basis for our preliminary determination 

is set forth in the Memorandum to 

Howard Smith, Acting Director, AD/

CVD Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Preliminary 

Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Hengdian 

Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.,’’ 

dated April 7, 2015, which is on the 

record of this proceeding. 

Public Comment 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of the preliminary 

results of review.5 Rebuttals to case 

briefs may be filed no later than five 

days after the briefs are filed. All 

rebuttal comments must be limited to 

comments raised in the case briefs.6

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement & Compliance, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, within 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice.7 Requests should contain the 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number, the number of participants, and 

a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral 

argument presentations will be limited 

to issues raised in the briefs. If a request 

for a hearing is made, the Department 

intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, at a date and 

time to be determined.8 Parties should 

confirm by telephone the date, time, and 

location of the hearing two days before 

the scheduled date. 

All submissions, with limited 

exceptions, must be filed electronically 

using ACCESS. An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by the Department’s 

electronic records system, ACCESS, by 

5 p.m. Eastern Time (‘‘ET’’) on the due 

date. Documents excepted from the 

electronic submission requirements 

must be filed manually (i.e., in paper 

form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in 

Room 18022, and stamped with the date 

and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the 

due date.9

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this NSR, which will 

include the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any briefs received, no 

later than 90 days after the date these 

preliminary results of review are issued 

pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

‘‘Act’’). 

Assessment Rates 

If the Department proceeds to a final 

rescission of DMEGC’s NSR, the 

assessment rate to which DMEGC’s 

shipments will be subject will not be 

affected by this review. However, the 

Department initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on solar cells from the PRC covering 

numerous exporters, including DMEGC, 

and the period December 1, 2013 

through November 30, 2014, which 

encompasses the POR of this NSR.10

Thus, if the Department proceeds to a 

final rescission, we will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

continue to suspend entries during the 

period December 1, 2013 through 

November 30, 2014 of subject 

merchandise exported by DMEGC until 

CBP receives instructions relating to the 

administrative review of this order 

covering the period December 1, 2013 

through November 30, 2014. 

If the Department does not proceed to 

a final rescission of this new shipper 

review, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1), we will calculate 

importer-specific (or customer) 

assessment rates based on the final 

results of this review. However, 

pursuant to the Department’s refinement 

to its assessment practice in NME cases, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales database submitted by 

DMEGC, the Department will instruct 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the 

PRC-wide rate.11

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Effective upon publication of the final 

rescission or the final results of this 

NSR, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(e), the Department will instruct 

CBP to discontinue the option of posting 

a bond or security in lieu of a cash 

deposit for entries of subject 

merchandise by DMEGC. If the 

Department proceeds to a final 

rescission of this new shipper review, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the PRC-wide rate for DMEGC because 

the Department will not have 

determined an individual margin of 

dumping for DMEGC. If the Department 

issues final results for this new shipper 

review, the Department will instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits, effective 

upon the publication of the final results, 

at the rates established therein. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 7, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Scope 

2. Bona Fide Sales Analysis 

[FR Doc. 2015–09206 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–916] 

Laminated Woven Sacks From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On January 28, 2015, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

‘‘Department’’) published the 

Preliminary Results 1 of the 2013–2014 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
22166 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices 

Results’’) and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: 

Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s Republic 

of China, 73 FR 45941 (August 7, 2008) (‘‘Order’’). 

3 ‘‘Paper suitable for high quality print graphics,’’ 

as used herein, means paper having an ISO 

brightness of 82 or higher and a Sheffield 

Smoothness of 250 or less. Coated free sheet is an 

example of a paper suitable for high quality print 

graphics. 

4At the request of U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’), the Department added the 

USHTS subheading 6305.33.0040 to the ACE CRF 

for the antidumping duty order. See ‘‘Memorandum 

to the File, from Irene Gorelik, Analyst, re: Addition 

of U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (‘‘USHTS’’) 

Numbers to the Automated Commercial Enterprise 

(‘‘ACE’’) Case Reference File (‘‘CRF’’),’’ dated 

September 24, 2014. 

5See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation, in Part, 79 FR 58729 

(September 30, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

6The nine companies are: Changle Baodu Plastic 

Co., Ltd., Shangdong Qikai Plastics Product Co., 

Ltd., Wenzhou Hotsun Plastics Co., Ltd., Zibo 

Aifudi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd., Zibo Linzi 

Luitong Plastic Fabric Co., Ltd., Zibo Linzi 

Shuaiqiang Plastics Co., Ltd., Zibo Linzi Qitianli 

Plastic Fabric Co., Ltd., Zibo Linzi Worun Packing 

Product Co., Ltd., and Zibo Qigao Plastic Cement 

Co., Ltd. 

7See Preliminary Results, 80 FR 4537–4538 and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Pursuant to the Department’s change in practice, 

the Department no longer considers the non-market 

economy entity as an exporter conditionally subject 

to administrative reviews. See Antidumping 

Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 

Department Practice for Respondent Selection in 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional 

Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 

65970 (November 4, 2013). Under this practice, the 

non-market economy entity will not be under 

review unless a party specifically requests, or the 

Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. 

Because no party requested a review of the entity, 

the entity is not under review and the entity’s rate 

is not subject to change. 

8See Implementation of Determinations under 

Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: 

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires; Circular 

Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe; Laminated 

Woven Sacks; and Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe 

and Tube from the People’s Republic of China, 77 

FR 52683, 52688 (August 30, 2012). 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on laminated 

woven sacks (‘‘sacks’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The period 

of review (‘‘POR’’) is August 1, 2013, 

through July 31, 2014. We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results, 

but we received none. The final 

dumping margin for the PRC-wide 

entity is listed in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section below. 

DATES: April 21, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

We received no comments from 

interested parties on our Preliminary 

Results dated January 28, 2015. The 

Department conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order 2 is laminated woven sacks. 

Laminated woven sacks are bags or 

sacks consisting of one or more plies of 

fabric consisting of woven 

polypropylene strip and/or woven 

polyethylene strip, regardless of the 

width of the strip; with or without an 

extrusion coating of polypropylene and/ 

or polyethylene on one or both sides of 

the fabric; laminated by any method 

either to an exterior ply of plastic film 

such as biaxially-oriented 

polypropylene (‘‘BOPP’’) or to an 

exterior ply of paper that is suitable for 

high quality print graphics; 3 printed 

with three colors or more in register; 

with or without lining; whether or not 

closed on one end; whether or not in 

roll form (including sheets, lay-flat 

tubing, and sleeves); with or without 

handles; with or without special closing 

features; not exceeding one kilogram in 

weight. Laminated woven sacks are 

typically used for retail packaging of 

consumer goods such as pet foods and 

bird seed. 

Effective July 1, 2007, laminated 

woven sacks are classifiable under 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 

6305.33.0050 and 6305.33.0080. 

Laminated woven sacks were previously 

classifiable under HTSUS subheading 

6305.33.0020. If entered with plastic 

coating on both sides of the fabric 

consisting of woven polypropylene strip 

and/or woven polyethylene strip, 

laminated woven sacks may be 

classifiable under HTSUS subheadings 

3923.21.0080, 3923.21.0095, and 

3923.29.0000. If entered not closed on 

one end or in roll form (including 

sheets, lay-flat tubing, and sleeves), 

laminated woven sacks may be 

classifiable under other HTSUS 

subheadings including 3917.39.0050, 

3921.90.1100, 3921.90.1500, and 

5903.90.2500. If the polypropylene 

strips and/or polyethylene strips making 

up the fabric measure more than 5 

millimeters in width, laminated woven 

sacks may be classifiable under other 

HTSUS subheadings including 

4601.99.0500, 4601.99.9000, and 

4602.90.0000.4 Although HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Preliminary Results 

Upon initiation 5 of the administrative 

review, we provided all companies 6

initiated for review the opportunity to 

submit either a ‘‘no shipment’’ 

certification or the separate rate 

application or certification. None of the 

nine companies initiated for review 

submitted ‘‘no shipment’’ certifications. 

Furthermore, none of the nine 

companies under review submitted 

separate rate eligibility documentation. 

As a result, we preliminarily found that 

these nine companies are part of the 

PRC-wide entity.7 The rate previously 

established for the PRC-wide entity in 

this proceeding is 47.64 percent.8

Final Results of Review 

The Department did not receive any 

comments from interested parties after 

issuing the Preliminary Results. Thus, 

because nothing has changed since the 

Preliminary Results with respect to the 

above-noted nine companies initiated 

for review, we continue to find them to 

be part of the PRC-wide entity, to which 

we are assigning the previously 

established rate of 47.64 percent for the 

period August 1, 2013, through July 31, 

2014. 

Assessment 

The Department determined, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of these final results of 

review. For those companies subject to 

this review found to be part of the PRCwide entity, the Department will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on entries of subject merchandise 

at the PRC-wide rate of 47.67 percent. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters not noted above 

that have separate rates, the cash 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices 22167 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (2) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the PRC-wide rate of 47.64 percent; 

and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

PRC exporters that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to the 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and this notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the 

Act. 

Dated: April 14, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–09229 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Proposed Information Collection; 

Comment Request; NOAA Satellite 

Ground Station Customer 

Questionnaire 

AGENCY: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork and 

respondent burden, invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before June 22, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental 

Paperwork Clearance Officer, 

Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 

14th and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 

Internet at JJessup@doc.gov). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the information collection 

instrument and instructions should be 

directed to Kay Metcalf, 301–817–4558 

or kay.metcalf@noaa.gov; Scott 

Rogerson, 301–817–4543 or 

scott.rogerson@noaa.gov; or Paul 

Seymour, 301–817–4521 or 

paul.seymour@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

This request is for an extension of a 

currently approved information 

collection. NOAA asks people who 

operate ground receiving stations that 

receive data from NOAA satellites to 

complete a questionnaire about the 

types of data received, its use, the 

equipment involved, and similar 

subjects. The data obtained are used by 

NOAA for short-term operations and 

long-term planning. Collection of this 

data assists us in complying with the 

terms of our Memorandum of 

Understanding (MOU) with the World 

Meteorological Organization: United 

States Department of Commerce, 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (NOAA) on area of 

common interest (2008). 

II. Method of Collection 

The information is collected via an 

online questionnaire. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0648–0227. 

Form Number: None. 

Type of Review: Regular submission 

(extension of a currently approved 

information collection). 

Affected Public: Not-for-profit 

institutions; business or other for-profit 

organizations, individuals or 

households; federal government; state, 

local or tribal Government. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

300. 

Estimated Time per Response: 5 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 25. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0 in capital and recordkeeping/ 

reporting costs. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: April 16, 2015. 

Sarah Brabson, 

NOAA PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–09173 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–HR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XD906 

Western Pacific Fishery Management 

Council; Public Meetings 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public meetings. 

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery 

Management Council (Council) will 

convene a meeting of the Risk of 

Overfishing (denoted by P*) Working 

Group (P* WG) for the Main Hawaiian 

Island Deep 7 Bottomfish Fishery. The 

P* WG will review the P* dimensions 

and criteria, provide new scores (as 

appropriate), and recommend an 

appropriate risk of overfishing levels. 

This will be the basis for the 

specification of Acceptable Biological 

Catch (ABC) levels for the Scientific and 

Statistical Committee (SSC) to consider. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES