alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4297 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

to review, update, and revise certain regulations relating to assistance 

under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2009 

Mr. HODES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to review, update, and revise certain 

regulations relating to assistance under the Robert T. 

Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Disaster Assist5 ance Improvement Act of 2009’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4297 IH

1 SEC. 2. INDIVIDUAL ASSISTANCE FACTORS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to provide more objective 

3 criteria for evaluating the need for assistance to individ4 uals and to speed a declaration of a major disaster or 

5 emergency under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

6 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), 

7 not later than one year after the date of enactment of this 

8 Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Manage9 ment Agency, in cooperation with representatives of State 

10 and local emergency management agencies, shall review, 

11 update, and revise through rulemaking the factors consid12 ered under section 206.48 of title 44, Code of Federal 

13 Regulations, to measure the severity, magnitude, and im14 pact of a disaster. 

15 (b) RURAL AREAS.—In carrying out subsection (a), 

16 the Administrator shall consider any disproportionate im17 pacts of disasters on rural areas, including rural areas in 

18 which a relatively small number of residences are damaged 

19 or destroyed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

DAVID W. NORVELL,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-316

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent case)

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING THE JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND 

(DOC. 16); (2) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE 

FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND 

(3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET

______________________________________________________________________________

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is presently before the Court on the parties’ 

joint motion to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings 

pursuant to the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 16. Based upon the stipulation of 

the parties, and for good cause shown, the ALJ’s non-disability finding is REVERSED as

unsupported by substantial evidence and the parties’ joint motion for a Sentence Four remand 

(doc. 16) is GRANTED. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth 

Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. The Clerk is ORDERED to enter 

judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to TERMINATE this case on the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: March 16, 2018 s/ Michael J. Newman 

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly report of Collectible Concepts Group, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Paul S. Lipschutz, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc.  and will be retained by
Collectible  Concepts  Group,  Inc.and  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:   September 17, 2004                        By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Paul S. Lipschutz
                                                    Principal Financial Officer
#### The People v. Dan Van Wagner.

*Limitation on review in criminal cases*— Oertio-rwi.

Writs of error and of certiorari are barred after five years from judgment, and if sued out -will be dismissed.

The writ of certiorari is appropriate to accompany the writ of error in criminal cases, if issued in time.

*172Error to Kalamazoo. (Hawes, J.)

June 19.

June 22.

Assault with intent to kill and murder. Respondent brings error.

Dismissed.

*Blanchard <& Oagwin*for appellant.

Attorney General *Jacob J. Van Riper*for tbe People.

OaMpbbll, J.

Respondent, w.ho pleaded guilty to a charge of assault with intent to murder, now seeks on writ of error to reverse the judgment for an alleged irregularity.

It is sufficient to say that the writ was not sued out until about six years after judgment, five years being the statutory limitation, allowing for all disabilities, both for writs of error and writs of certiorari; the latter writ being appropriate to accompany the writ of error, if issued in time.

The writ must be dismissed.

The other Justices concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; NHLBI Mentored Transition to Independence Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         March 10-11, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Giuseppe Pintucci, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 205-H, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7969,                         *Pintuccig@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 6, 2022.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-00436 Filed 1-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Parts 1 and 16
          - [Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0365]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final rule entitled “Administrative Detention of Drugs Intended for Human or Animal Use” that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of May 29, 2014 (79 FR 30716). The rule sets forth the procedures for detention of drugs believed to be adulterated or misbranded and amends the scope of FDA's part 16 regulatory hearing procedures to include the administrative detention of drugs. The rule published with incorrect statements regarding the impact of the final rule on small entities. This document corrects those errors.                    

# DATES:

Effective April 22, 2015 and applicable beginning June 30, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Emily Leongini, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 4339, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5300,                         *FDASIAImplementationORA@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of May 29, 2014, in FR Doc. 2014-12458, the following corrections are made:                

1. On page 30718, in the third column, under “Analysis of Impacts (Summary of the Regulatory Impact Analysis),” the last sentence of the second paragraph is corrected to read: “FDA certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.”

2. On page 30719, in the first column, the third sentence of the last full paragraph is corrected to read: “We certify that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.”

Dated: April 16, 2015.

Leslie Kux,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-09301 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Drone!UAS Practice Group 

ANTONELLI - LAW--

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Request for Exemption under Section 333 

ID: FAA-2015-0163 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

100 North LaSalle Street 

Suite2400 

Chicago, IL 60602 

Tel. 312.201.8310 

J effrey(l1.JAntonelli -Law. com 

April 2, 2015 

This comment is to amend the Request for Exemption under Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of2012 filed on behalf ofOwlcam LLC ("Owlcam") filed on 

January 23 , 2015; Docket No. FAP,.-2015-0163. 

Owlcam hereby amends Section III(B) of the request to indicate that the sUAS will be operated 

at a maximum height of 200 feet AGL, rather than 400 feet AGL. All subsequent references to 

"400 feet AGL" (including that in proposed conduction 5) are also amended to refer to "200 feet 

AGL." 

This amendment will simplify the issues that the FAA needs to decide. Therefore, Owl cam 

requests expedited approval of the pending 333 request for exemption. 

Of Counsel 

Mark C. Del Bianco 

3929 Washington Street 

Kensington, MD 20895 

Tel: 301.933.7216 

Cell: 301.602.5892 

mark@markdelbianco.com 
Of Counsel 

Kate D. Fletcher 

Airline Transport Pilot License 

Type rated in: 

CE-500 (Citation Jet) 

SF-340 (Saab turbo prop) 

DC-9 (turbo-jet) 

B-73 7 (Boeing 73 7) 

B-757 (Boeing 757) 

B-767 (Boeing 767) 

First Class Medical Certificate 

Tel: 312.285.4359 

katc@kdi1etcherlaw.com
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Cal Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   



| | Dated this 14th day of October, 2008.
| | -------------------------------------



| | CAL KANTONENCal KantonenChief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------

















---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

TERRI R. PARRISH, : Case No. 3:17-cv-411
Plaintiff, : District Judge Walter H. Rice
: Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

DECISION AND ENTRY

This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of
Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
(Doc. #15). Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees
in the amount of $3,100.00, and no costs, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and
all claims Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. Prior to Plaintiff
filing an EAJA petition, the parties jointly reached a resolution to settle EAJA fees in
this case. Their Stipulation represents a compromise on disputed positions and is not
intended to set precedent for, or a representation of, any specific hourly rate or total
number of hours.

The award of attorney fees will satisfy all of Plaintiffs claims for fees, costs, and
expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, and

not his attorney, can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the


United States under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010).

After the Court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that
Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the
award be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly
signed by Plaintiff.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The Parties’ Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees
under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #15) is accepted
and Defendant shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees, costs, and
expenses in the total amount of $3,100.00;

2s Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this
Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-
existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such
pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award
directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment
signed by Plaintiff; and

Ss The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Ja-tEA¥ i Rov ff ek,

Walter H. Rice
United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

 EASTERN DIVISION

Henri Bendel, Inc., :

 Plaintiff, :

v. :Case No. 2:17-cv-198

 :CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Illuminum Incorporated Ltd., Magistrate Judge Kemp

Defendant. :

 

 ORDER

This case is stayed. Plaintiff shall file a status report

every ninety days. 

/s/ Terence P. Kemp 

United States Magistrate Judge
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

November 8, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00205

- CV

Trece MEUTH

, Appellant

v.

CITY OF SEGUIN

, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 0546

- CV

- A Honorable William Ol d, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After we granted Appellee’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief, the brief was due on November 7, 2018. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b), (d). Before the due date, Appellee filed an unopposed second motion for extension of time to file the brief until Dece mber
7 , 2018. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due on Dec ember 7 , 2018.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of November, 20 18

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Southern District of Ohio

LANDMARK TECHNOLOGY LLC

2:17-cv-908

ANTHONY-THOMAS CANDY COMPANY

Anthony-Thomans Candy Company

1777 Arlington Lane

Columbus, Ohio 43228

Howard L. Wernow, Esq.

SAND & SEBOLT, LPA

4940 Munson Street NW, Suite 1100

Canton, Ohio 44718

10/19/2017

Case: 2:17-cv-00908-MHW-CMV Doc #: 5 Filed: 10/19/17 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 43
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:17-cv-908

0.00

Case: 2:17-cv-00908-MHW-CMV Doc #: 5 Filed: 10/19/17 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 44
Order entered September 18, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00333-CR

ADRIAN CARDONA VELASQUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1476518-M

ORDER

The State’s motion for extension of time to file brief is GRANTED. The State’s Brief is 

deemed FILED September 15, 2017. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

ANNE SAVARESE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE 

COMPANY OF BOSTON, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:17-cv-01017

Judge Smith

Magistrate Judge Deavers

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT CENTENE 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Anne Savarese, hereby dismisses,

without prejudice, her claims against Defendant Centene Management Company, LLC Long-Term 

Disability Plan only. Plaintiff is not dismissing her claims against Defendant Liberty Life 

Assurance Company of Boston.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gregory R. Mansell

______________

Gregory R. Mansell (0085197)

Greg@MansellLawLLC.com

Carrie J. Dyer (0090539)

Carrie@MansellLawLLC.com

Mansell Law LLC

1457 S. High Street

Columbus, Ohio 43207

Ph: 614.610.9899

Fax: 513.826.9311

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case: 2:17-cv-01017-GCS-EPD Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/31/18 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 40
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 31st day of January 2018, a copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court’s electronic 

filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system.

/s/ Gregory R. Mansell

Gregory R. Mansell (0085197)

Case: 2:17-cv-01017-GCS-EPD Doc #: 5 Filed: 01/31/18 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 41