alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Paul J. Kelly, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Orchid BioSciences, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: November 13, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ Paul J. Kelly      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  |  | Paul J. Kelly, M.D.    
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
CKS Group, Inc.

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-3412, 333-18085, 333-22953, 333-23783, 333-24763,
333-25447, 333-27331, 333-38825 and 333-41109) on Forms S-8 and S-3 of CKS
Group, Inc. of our reports dated December 15, 1997, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of CKS Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of November 30, 1997 and
1996, and related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30,
1997, and the related schedule, which reports appear in the November 30, 1997,
annual report on Form 10-K of CKS Group, Inc.


                                        /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


San Jose, California
February 27, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996 
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        189,647 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,027 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                     2,922 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              195,769       
<PP&E>                                        308,921      
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,854    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                522,595      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,731    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<COMMON>                                          683
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                    494,819       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  522,595         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,745          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,377          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,906       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,470      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,436      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,436 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .06 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .06 
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1990

WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY,

Petitioner,

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CALVIN R. CLYBURN,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (15-0331-BLA)

Submitted: April 20, 2017 Decided: April 26, 2017

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul E. Frampton, Sarah E. Smith, BOWLES RICE LLP, Charleston, West Virginia, for 

Petitioner. M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Maia S. Fisher, Associate Solicitor, Gary 

K. Stearman, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Michelle S. Gerdano, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Timothy C. MacDonnell, Gabriella E. 

Alonso, Student Caseworker, Black Lung Legal Clinic, WASHINGTON AND LEE 

UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Lexington, Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Westmoreland Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s 

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits 

pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-944 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that the 

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, No. 15-0331-BLA 

(B.R.B. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

s1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145407

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145407

COA: 307688

Oakland CC: 2006

- 208894

- FC

TIMOTHY PAUL BUSS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 32.0
 Section 1350 CERTIFICATION
   (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive Officer By:
    /s/ Brendan J. McGillBrendan J. McGillSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to
Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and will be retained by Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ezcomm Enterprises Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Peter
Braun, as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Peter Braun
-----------------------

Peter Braun
President, CEO and CFO
January 5, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28598]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Investment Security

31 CFR Part 800


Determination Regarding Excepted Foreign States

AGENCY: Office of Investment Security, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Determination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as Chair of the Committee on 
Foreign Investment in the United States, is publishing the Committee's 
determination that two foreign states have established and are 
effectively utilizing a robust process to analyze foreign investments 
for national security risks and to facilitate coordination with the 
United States on matters relating to investment security.

DATES: Effective January 5, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Black, Director of Investment 
Security Policy and International Relations, at U.S. Department of the 
Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20220; telephone: 
(202) 622-3425; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96d5d0dfc3c5b8d0dfc4c4dbd7d6e2e4f3f7e5e3e4efb8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1a2a7a8b4b2cfa7a8b3b3aca0a19593848092949398cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The list of excepted foreign states and additional information with 
respect to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States 
(CFIUS or the Committee) are available on the Committee's section of 
the Department of the Treasury website.

Notice of CFIUS Action

    The Committee, taking into consideration the factors identified on 
the Committee's section of the Department of the Treasury website, has 
determined, under the authority of section 721 of the Defense 
Production Act of 1950, as amended, and 31 CFR 800.1001(a), that: (1) 
Australia has established and is effectively utilizing a robust process 
to analyze foreign investments for national security risks and to 
facilitate coordination with the United States on matters relating to 
investment security; and (2) Canada has established and is effectively 
utilizing a robust process to analyze foreign investments for national 
security risks and to facilitate coordination with the United States on 
matters relating to investment security.
    This determination satisfies the second criterion in the definition 
of excepted foreign state under 31 CFR 800.218 with respect to 
Australia and Canada. Therefore, Australia and Canada are and will 
remain excepted foreign states absent further Committee action and 
notice in the Federal Register.

Larry McDonald,
Acting Assistant Secretary for International Markets.
[FR Doc. 2021-28598 Filed 1-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4095 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4095

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9727 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, as the ``Congresswoman 
                   Jan Meyers Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSWOMAN JAN MEYERS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9727 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Congresswoman Jan Meyers Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Congresswoman Jan Meyers Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 20, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
17443

#### Henry WRIGHT, Appellant, v. W. W. PLAYER, Respondent

(124 S. E. (2d) 289)

*224*Messrs. Stuckey & Stuckey,*of Bisliopville, *for Appellant,*

*Messrs. Lee & Moise,*of Sumter, *for Respondent,*

*Messrs. Stuckey & Stuckey,*of Bisliopville, *for Appellant, in Reply,*

July 7, 1958.

Legge, Justice.

Appeal here is from a circuit court order affirming a magistrate’s judgment directing ejectment of a tenant for nonpayment of rent. The facts, which appear undisputed, were as follows:

On March 1, 1951, J. C. Strauss entered into a written agreement with Henry Wright whereby he leased to Wright a parcel of farm land. Following are the pertinent provisions of the lease:

> “That the term of this lease is to extend throughout the life time of said Henry Wright and his wife Mary E. Wright and the survivor of them. That during the term of this lease they, or the survivor of them, will pay or cause to be paid as rent the sum of Seventy-five ($75.00) Dollars, which rent is to become due and payable on or before October of each year commencing October 1, 1951 * * *. Failure to pay rent under this agreement will constitute a breach of this agreement. * * *”

*225On May 24, 1956, the leased premises were sold to the respondent W. W. Player. On September 13, 1956, respondent through his attorney notified Wright that he had bought the property and that the rent for the year 1956 (which would become due and payable on or before October of that year) should be paid to him. At the same time respondent’s attorney notified Wright that respondent was to have possession of the property on January 1, 1957.

On January 8, 1957, the rent for the year 1956 having not been paid, respondent brought a proceeding in the Magistrate’s Court for ejectment because of such default. After the ejectment proceeding had been commenced, tender of the rent was made and rejected. The ejectment proceeding was heard before the magistrate on September 13, 1957.

Appellant contends that the circuit judge (whose order is not reproduced in the record) erred in not holding that respondent’s notice to appellant to relinquish possession on January 1, 1957, constituted an election by respondent to breach the contract of lease, and thereby relieved appellant of his obligation to pay the 1956 rent. The argument is fallacious. Whether such notice constituted an election, or implied the intention, on the part of respondent to breach the lease is a matter upon which we need express no opinion, because it is foreign to the issue here involved. If it did constitute such election or imply such intention, it would have related to respondent’s obligation on and after January 1, 1957. But whatever may have been the effect of the notice, it did not affect appellant’s obligation to pay the 1956 rent. His failure to do so entitled respondent to invoke the statutory remedy of ejectment. Code, 1952, Sections 41-55, 41-65, 41-101. Respondent was under no obligation to accept the 1956 rent tendered after the ejectment proceeding had been commenced, and thus waive his legal right that had accrued by reason of appellant’s default.

Affirmed.

Stukes, C. J., and Taylor, Oxner and Moss, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eilliam
Fletcher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15
      (d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William Fletcher
--------------------

William Fletcher
Chief Financial Officer

March 8, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q of American Community
Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Randy P. Helton                  
|                     |  |     |  | Randy P. Helton                      
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00198]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 
Act

    On December 29, 2021, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed 
Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District 
of South Carolina, in the lawsuit entitled United States v. New-Indy 
Catawba LLC, Civil Action No. 0:21-cv-02053-SAL.
    The United States filed this lawsuit under the Clean Air Act. The 
United States' complaint seeks injunctive relief related to emissions 
of Hydrogen Sulfide from defendant's paper mill in Catawba, South 
Carolina. The consent decree requires the defendant to perform 
injunctive relief to abate hydrogen sulfide emissions, and to pay a 
$1.1 million civil penalty.
    The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on 
the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and 
should refer to United States v. New-Indy Catawba LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 
90-5-2-1-12471. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty 
(30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be 
submitted either by email or by mail:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
          To submit comments:                     Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email...............................  <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6c6c3d4d5d9dbdbd3d8c29bd3d3c598d3d8c4d2f6c3c5d2d9dc98d1d9c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f1f1a0d0c0002020a011b420a0a1c410a011d0b2f1a1c0b000541080019">[email protected]</span></a>.
By mail................................  Assistant Attorney General,
                                          U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
                                          Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be 
examined at and downloaded from this Justice Department website: 
https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper 
copy of the Consent Decree upon written request and payment of 
reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent 
Decree Library, U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-
7611.
    Please enclose a check or money order for $8.75 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.

Lori Jonas,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-00198 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>