alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

Environmental Protection Division 

A. Stanley Meiberg flPA-UGION H 

Acting Regional Administrator Atull'i.'A. G4 

U.S. EPA, Region 4 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-31 04 

RE: Withdrawal of Section 11 O(a)(2)(D)(i)(l) Portion of the Georgia's Certification 

of 110(a) Infrastructure Elements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQs 

Dear Mr. Meiburg: 

On March 6, 2012, the Georgia Environmental Division (EPD) submitted a letter to the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certifying that Georgia's current State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) contains the Section 11 O(a) elements of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) that meet the requirements of the 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) as revised in 2008. 

The 11 O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) is the interstate transport component, also known as the "good 

neighbor obligation" and requires the determination of significant contribution to 

nonattainment or maintenance of downwind States. On August 21, 2012, the decision 

by The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to vacate the 2011 

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) (EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, No. 

11-1302) clarified that only EPA can determine "significant contribution" and that "a SIP 

cannot be deemed to lack a required submission or be deemed deficient for failing to 

implement the good neighbor obligation until after EPA has defined the State's good 

neighbor obligation," which is reiterated in the November 19, 2012 EPA memo from 

Gina McCarthy, Assistant Administrator. 

At this time, EPA has yet to determine Georgia's significant contribution of pollutants, in 

regards to the 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS, to any downwind State. Therefore, no 

revision to Georgia's SIP is necessary at this time to incorporate this element of Section 

11 O(a) of the CAA. Once EPA determines Georgia's significant contribution to 

nonattainment or maintenance areas in downwind States, then EPA may require 

Georgia to submit a SIP revision under Section 11 O(k)(5) or submit a new SIP under 

Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA. 

Therefore, the certification that GA EPD submitted relating to 11 O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) is no 

longer applicable. As such, the State of Georgia hereby withdraws the 11 O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) 

portion of the March 6, 2012 submission of the Certification of Infrastructure Elements 

for the 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS as they pertain to Georgia. 
A. Stanley Meiburg 

Page 2 of 2 

OCT!OI 2013 

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Keith Bentley at 

(404) 363-7016 or Jimmy Johnston at (404) 363-7014. 

Sincerely, 

. IIC-_ 

JHT:JPJ:JLK 

c: Scott Davis, U.S. EPA Region 4 

Keith Bentley, EPD, Air Protection Branch 

Jimmy Johnston, EPD, Air Protection Branch
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Extended Stay America, Inc. on Form S-3 (No. 333-100), on Form S-3 (No.
333-21625), on Form S-3 (No. 333-32345), on Form S-8 (No. 333-10255), on Form
S-8 (No. 333-25639), and on Form S-8 (No. 333-43427) of our report dated January
27, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Extended
Stay America, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for the years ended
December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Spartanburg, South Carolina
March 15, 2000
Presidential Documents

151 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 2 

Tuesday, January 4, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 10330 of December 29, 2021 

Death of Harry Reid 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

From humble roots in Searchlight, Nevada, Harry Reid rose to become one 

of the great Senate Majority Leaders in American history. He was a man 

of action, and a man of his word—guided by faith, loyalty, and unshakeable 

resolve. 

Throughout his long career of public service, Harry Reid was instrumental 

in passing landmark legislation that made a positive difference in the lives 

of countless Americans and made our Nation stronger and safer. His devoted 

service to our Nation was not about power for power’s sake. It was about 

the power to do right by the American people. 

As a mark of respect for his memory, I hereby order, by the authority 

vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of 

America, that on the day of his interment, the flag of the United States 

shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings 

and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval 

vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout 

the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset on such 

day. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same 

period at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other 

facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth 

day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-one, and 

of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred 

and forty-sixth. 

[FR Doc. 2021–28554 

Filed 1–3–22; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F2–P 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with PRES DOCBIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Resignation of Donald R. Mastropietro



 Exhibit 10.01 

Exhibit 10.01 – Resignation of Donald R. Mastropietro 

June 15, 2010 
 Board of Directors

 AMHN, Inc. 
 100 North First Street

 Suite 104 
 Burbank, CA 91502

 Effective immediately, please consider this letter my resignation as Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of AMHN,
Inc. My resignation was not the result of a disagreement with the Company or any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies, or practices. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Donald R. Mastropietro
	Donald R. Mastropietro

  

 5
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW A. DuBOIS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16031

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-00415-MMDVPC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Miranda Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 14, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Matthew A. DuBois appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs while detained in a Nevada jail. We have

FILED

OCT 22 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s

dismissal for failure to state a claim. Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th

Cir. 2011) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,

341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed DuBois’s claim against defendant

Dr. Hahn because DuBois failed to allege facts sufficient to show that Dr. Hahn

acted with deliberate indifference in treating his foot injury. See Toguchi v. Chung,

391 F.3d 1051, 1057, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004) (deliberate indifference is a high legal

standard, and is met only if the prison official knows of and disregards an

excessive risk to the prisoner’s health; medical malpractice or negligence is

insufficient to establish an Eighth Amendment violation); see also Starr v. Baca,

652 F.3d 1202, 1207-08 (9th Cir. 2011) (elements for supervisory liability under

§ 1983); Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz., 609 F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir. 2010)

(the Eighth Amendment standard applies to pretrial detainees alleging cruel and

unusual punishment in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment).

The district court properly dismissed DuBois’s claim against defendants

Washoe County Sheriff’s Office and Prison Health Services because DuBois failed

to allege facts sufficient to show that he was harmed by a policy or custom. See

Jackson v. Barnes, 749 F.3d 755, 762-64 (9th Cir. 2014) (requirements for alleging

2 13-16031
municipal liability under § 1983); Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc., 698 F.3d 1128,

1138-39 (9th Cir. 2012) (requirements for municipal liability apply to private

entities sued under § 1983).

To the extent that DuBois challenges the district court’s order staying

discovery, the court did not abuse its discretion because DuBois failed to describe

the discovery he sought. See Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002)

(setting forth the standard of review and describing trial court’s broad discretion to

deny discovery).

AFFIRMED.

3 13-16031
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: February 21, 2006 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                     
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                        | Marc N. Teal, Chief
Financial Officer



69
E

C

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919)484-0222  Fax: (919) 484-0122

MEMORANDUM

Date: August 20, 2010

To: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG

From: Denise Grubert, EC/R Incorporated

Subject: Documentation of the Site Visit to Williams Energy in Parachute, Colorado

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this memorandum is to document the Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) site visit to Williams Energy. 

II. LOCATION AND DATE

The facility was located in the town of Parachute, Colorado. The site visit took place on 

August 4, 2010

III. ATTENDEES

Williams Energy

Sarah Bartlett, Environmental Specialist

Donna Gray, Community Relations

Gretchen Kohler, Williams E & P Environmental (non-air)

Rick Matar, Air Quality 

Donny Mitchell, Engineer

Tim Tangeman, Air Permit Lead

Paul White, Engineering Manager

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Rachel Agnew

Jodi Howard

Bruce Moore

Greg Nizich

Nick Parsons
E

C

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

2

Colorado APHE

Scott Patefield, Enforcement Supervisor

EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown

Denise Grubert

Karen Marsh

The site visit report for this facility contains confidential business information (CBI), and 

pending approval by the facility, a non-confidential report has not been issued.
# C_2019295EN.01001901.xml

| 2.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — BP v FRA

(Case T-888/16) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - FRA - Fixed-term contract - Decision not to renew - New decision adopted following an annulment by the General Court - Rights of the defence - Principle of sound administration - Obligation to state reasons - Liability)

(2019/C 295/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BP (represented by: E. Lazar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (represented by: M. O’Flaherty, Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU, seeking (i) annulment of the FRA decision of 4 April 2016 not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff, adopted as a result of the implementation of the judgment of 3 June 2015, BP v FRA, (T-658/13 P, EU:T:2015:356); and (ii) compensation for the damage which the applicant allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders BP to bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BP to bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA).

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-207-1

Jesus Antonio Ramos-Chirino 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 73) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: March 23, 2018 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4089 

To create and extend certain temporary district court judgeships. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2009 

Mr. COSTA (for himself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, Ms. HIRONO, 

Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. TERRY, and 

Ms. SUTTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To create and extend certain temporary district court 

judgeships. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY JUDGESHIPS FOR DISTRICT 

4 COURTS. 

5 (a) ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY JUDGESHIPS.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, 

7 by and with the advice and consent of the Senate— 

8 (A) 1 additional district judge for the east9 ern district of California; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4089 IH

1 (B) 1 additional district judge for the dis2 trict of Nebraska. 

3 (2) VACANCIES NOT FILLED.—The first va4 cancy in the office of district judge in each of the 

5 judicial districts named in this subsection, occurring 

6 10 years or more after the confirmation date of the 

7 judge named to fill the temporary district judgeship 

8 created in the applicable judicial district by this sub9 section, shall not be filled. 

10 (b) EXTENSION OF CERTAIN TEMPORARY JUDGE11 SHIPS.—Section 203(c) of the Judicial Improvements Act 

12 of 1990 (Public Law 101–650; 28 U.S.C. 133 note) is 

13 amended— 

14 (1) in the third sentence (relating to the district 

15 of Kansas), by striking ‘‘18 years’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘26 years’’; 

17 (2) in the sixth sentence (relating to the north18 ern district of Ohio), by striking ‘‘18 years’’ and in19 serting ‘‘25 years’’; and 

20 (3) in the seventh sentence (relating to the dis21 trict of Hawaii), by striking ‘‘15 years’’ and insert22 ing ‘‘20 years’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 21223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08848]



[[Page 21223]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete products previously 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: 5/18/2015.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 715, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 
603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4e7e9f0e1e2c1c0f6c1c3e4e5c6cdc8cdd0ddebcac18ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="72313f26373417162017153233101b1e1b060b3d1c175c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    This notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 
CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested persons an opportunity 
to submit comments on the proposed actions.

Deletions

    The following products are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

Products

Product Name/NSN: Rain Gauge, 4''/6660-00-920-3722.
Mandatory Source of Supply: Productive Alternatives, Inc., Fergus 
Falls, MN.
Contracting Activity: Dept of Comm/Office of the Secretary, Kansas 
City, MO.

Product Name(s)/NSN(s): Brassard, Military Police/8455-00-818-8826, 
Brassard, Army, Military/8455-01-236-1174.
Mandatory Source of Supply: No NPA Assigned.
Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, 
Philadelphia, PA.

Product Name/NSN(s): Vest, Load Bearing Equipment, 8465-01-440-
3690--Rappel Seat, Assembly, Part No 3505-06-203--strap, Leg, Part 
No 3505-06-205--Strap, Waist, 8465-01-440-5883--Harness, SPIE, 
Assembly.
Mandatory Source of Supply: Chautauqua County Chapter, NYSARC, 
Jamestown, NY.
Contracting Activity: Dept of the Navy, Commander, Quantico, VA.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015-08848 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
BALANCE SHEET OF BERTHEL FISHER & COMPANY LEASING, INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999,
AND THE AUDITED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         241,235
<SECURITIES>                                 1,185,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,222,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (494,764)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         453,124
<DEPRECIATION>                               (250,516)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,730,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          697,960
<BONDS>                                      5,730,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,621,422
<COMMON>                                       884,705
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,204,029)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,730,680
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,700,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,297,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               414,823
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             746,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (758,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (219,010)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (539,128)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (539,128)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.50)


</TABLE>