alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NHUONG VAN NGUYEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

JACKSON LUCKY; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-56701 

D.C. No. 5:17-cv-01752-JGB-KK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Nhuong Van Nguyen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action arising from a state court family law action. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s 

dismissal under the Rooker–Feldman doctrine. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 16 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-56701 

(9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Nguyen’s action as barred by the 

Rooker–Feldman doctrine because the complaint attacks a determination in 

Nguyen’s prior state court case. See id. at 1155-57 (Rooker–Feldman doctrine bars

de facto appeals of a state court decision). Contrary to Nguyen’s contention that he 

has alleged “fraud upon the court,” the district court properly concluded that 

Nguyen did not allege facts showing that an adverse party committed an extrinsic 

fraud on the state court. See Kougasian v. TMSL, Inc., 359 F.3d 1136, 1140-41 

(9th Cir. 2004) (defining extrinsic fraud, and recognizing that the Rooker–Feldman

doctrine does not apply if extrinsic fraud prevented a party from presenting his or 

her claim in state court).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
       (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: February 12, 2010
    /s/ Ronald B. GeibRonald B. GeibChief Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130711 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130711 

 COA: 266009 

Oakland CC: 2004-198626-FH 

BYRON KEITH MILLISOR,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons stated in her dissent in 

People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

p0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




 In connection with the Quarterly Report of OSK Capital III Corp(the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB  for  the  period  ending March 31, 2003 (the  "Report"),
I,  Deborah A. Salerno, Chief  Executive Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Deborah A. Salerno
--------------------
Deborah A. Salerno
President, Director and
Chief Executive Officer
December 22, 2003


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of OSK Capital III Corp(the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB  for  the  period  ending March 31, 2003 (the  "Report"),
I,  Frank L. Kramer, Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Frank L. Kramer
-----------------------
Frank L. Kramer
Treasurer, Secretary, Director and
Chief Financial Officer
December 22, 2003
Exhibit 21

CPG Partners, LP
Schedule of Significant Subsidiaries

|Subsidiary Name | State of Organization | Doing Business as Name
|--------------- | --------------------- | ----------------------

|Chelsea Allen Development, LP 
Chelsea Financing Partnership, L.P. | Texas 
Delaware | Allen Premium Outlets
Folsom Premium Outlets, Napa Premium Outlets,
     Columbia Gorge Premium Outlets
|------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|CPG Finance I LLC
CPG Finance II LLC 
Chelsea Orlando Development, L P 
F/C Acquisition Holdings LLC 
F/C Kittery Development LLC 
F/C Waterloo Development LLC 
F/C Michigan City Development LLC 
F/C Gilroy Development LLC 
Chelsea Pocono Finance LLC 
Chelsea Las Vegas Holdings LLC 
Chelsea Carlsbad Holdings, LLC 
Simon/Chelsea Las Vegas Development LLC
Simon/Chelsea Chicago Development LLC | Delaware
Delaware 
Florida 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Delaware 
California 
Delaware 
Nevada 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Delaware | Factory Stores of America
Factory Stores of America
Orlando Premium Outlets
none
Kittery Premium Outlets
Waterloo Premium Outlets
Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets
Gilroy Premium Outlets
The Crossings Premium Outlets
Las Vegas Outlet Center
Carlsbad Premium Outlets
Las Vegas Premium Outlets
Chicago Premium Outlets
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 1 of 13  PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 2 of 13  PAGEID #: 2

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 3 of 13  PAGEID #: 3

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 4 of 13  PAGEID #: 4

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 5 of 13  PAGEID #: 5

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 6 of 13  PAGEID #: 6

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 7 of 13  PAGEID #: 7

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 8 of 13  PAGEID #: 8

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 9 of 13  PAGEID #: 9

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 10 of 13  PAGEID #: 10

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 11 of 13  PAGEID #: 11

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 12 of 13  PAGEID #: 12

Case: 2:17-mj-00744-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 13 of 13  PAGEID #: 13
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4103 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4103

   To extend the authority of the Secretary of Education to purchase 
    guaranteed student loans for an additional year, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2009

   Mr. Kline of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. McKeon, Mr. 
   Hoekstra, Mr. Souder, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mrs. McMorris 
      Rodgers, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Thompson of 
Pennsylvania, and Mr. Ehlers) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the authority of the Secretary of Education to purchase 
    guaranteed student loans for an additional year, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF STUDENT LOAN PURCHASE AUTHORITY.

    Section 459A of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087i-
1) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``July 1, 2010'' each place it appears in 
        subsections (a)(1), (a)(3), and (f) and inserting ``July 1, 
        2011''; and
            (2) in subsection (e)--
                    (A) by striking ``September 30, 2010'' each place 
                it appears in paragraphs (1)(A) and (2) and inserting 
                ``September 30, 2011'';
                    (B) by striking ``February 15, 2011'' in paragraph 
                (2) and inserting ``February 15, 2012''; and
                    (C) by striking ``2010, and 2011'' in paragraph (3) 
                and inserting ``2010, 2011, and 2012''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE LENDERS FOR LENDER-OF-LAST-
              RESORT PROGRAM.

    Section 428(j) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1078(j)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ``June 30, 2010'' and 
        inserting ``June 30, 2011'';
            (2) in paragraph (7), by striking ``June 30, 2010'' and 
        inserting ``June 30, 2011''; and
            (3) in paragraph (9)(A)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subclause (I) of clause 
                (ii), by striking ``June 30, 2011'' and inserting 
                ``June 30, 2012'';
                    (B) in subclause (III) of clause (ii), by striking 
                ``June 30, 2010'' and inserting ``June 30, 2011''; and
                    (C) in clause (iii), by striking ``July 1, 2011'' 
                and inserting ``July 1, 2012''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CR-1-00-090-2

 :

 : JOINT MOTION FOR STAY IN

 v. : RULING ON A PRO SE MOTION

 : FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE

 : 

RAYMOND DOUTHIT : J. Beckwith

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The above named defendant has filed a pro se motion for

reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The

government and the Federal Public Defender file this joint motion

seeking a stay to allow time for both parties in conjunction with

the Probation Department to review this defendant’s case prior

the Court ruling on the merits of the defendant’s motion.

As noted in the Court’s General Order No. 08-03 filed

February 22, 2008, the United States Attorney’s office, the

Federal Public Defender, and the Probation Department have been

conducting a review of potentially eligible defendants who may

seek to have their sentences reduced under the retroactivity

provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The parties have reviewed

numerous cases with priority given to those whose prospective

release may be imminent.

This defendant’s case has not yet been reviewed. Upon

review, the parties will be better able to inform the Court

regarding both the defendant’s eligibility for a reduction, and

Case 1:00-cr-00090-SSB Document 113 Filed 05/01/2008 Page 1 of 2
2

whether such a reduction can be agreed upon by consent of the

parties.

Respectfully submitted,

GREGORY G. LOCKHART

United States Attorney

s/William E. Hunt

WILLIAM E. HUNT (0024951)

First Assistant U.S. Attorney

221 East Fourth Street

Suite 400

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

(513) 684-3711

Fax: (513) 684-6710

William.Hunt@usdoj.gov

STEVEN S. NOLDER

Federal Public Defender

s/Steven S. Nolder 

Federal Public Defender

One Columbus

10 West Broad St., Suite 1020

Columbus, Ohio 43215

(614) 469-2999

Steve Nolder@fd.org

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was served this 1st day

of May, 2008, by regular U.S. Mail on Raymond Douthit, #03372-061, FCI

Loretto, P.O. Box 1000, Loretto, PA 15940; and Steven S. Nolder,

Federal Public Defender, One Columbus, 10 West Broad Street, Suite

1020, Columbus, Ohio 43215.

s/William E. Hunt

WILLIAM E. HUNT (0024951)

First Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 1:00-cr-00090-SSB Document 113 Filed 05/01/2008 Page 2 of 2
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Presidential Documents 871 

Proclamation 10332 of December 30, 2021 

National Mentoring Month, 2022 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

I often say that America can be defined in one word—possibilities. No 

matter our background or circumstance, every child in America has the 

right to go as far as their dreams will take them. But those dreams are 

rarely reached alone. We all benefit from the support, wisdom, and nurturing 

of mentors who navigated the path before us. 

By standing on the shoulders of mentors, young people have led America 

forward at each inflection point in our history. I will never forget the 

many mentors who encouraged and empowered me as a student, as a local 

elected official in my twenties, and as a young United States Senator finding 

my way. During National Mentoring Month, we honor all those parents 

and family members, teachers and coaches, employers and co-workers, community and faith leaders, and so many others who devote time, care, and 

energy to helping our young people thrive. 

As we continue to build back from the pandemic, my Administration is 

making unprecedented investments to set the next generation up for success. 

Earlier this year, the Department of Labor awarded $89 million through 

its YouthBuild program and over $20 million through its Workforce Pathways 

for Youth programs to dedicated mentors who share their wisdom and 

experience and provide employment and counseling services to young people. We also proudly support initiatives across our executive departments 

and agencies that provide tutoring, community service opportunities, schoolbased and after-school programs, summer learning and enrichment, and 

work-based learning opportunities. 

As advocate and activist Marian Wright Edelman said, ‘‘It is the responsibility 

of every adult—especially parents, educators, and religious leaders—to make 

sure that children hear what we have learned from the lessons of life 

and to hear over and over that we love them and that they are not alone.’’ 

Mentorship is vital to fulfilling this responsibility, expanding opportunity, 

and helping our children fulfill their God-given potential. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 2022 as 

National Mentoring Month. I call upon Americans across the country to 

observe this month with mentoring, appropriate ceremonies, activities, and 

programs. 


TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with PRES DOC 1
872 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-one, and of 

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 

forty-sixth. 

[FR Doc. 2022–00167 

Filed 1–5–22; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F2–P 


TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with PRES DOC 1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit
10.1 


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 1 


 


TO



 


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), dated October 2, 2015, is by and between Drone Aviation
Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation with an address 11651 Central Parkway #118, Jacksonville, FL 32224 (the “Company”),
and Felicia Hess, an individual (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS,
the parties entered into an Employment Agreement on May 18, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS,
the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth below, with the understanding that all other provisions of the
Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged;


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:


1.Section
2 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


The
Employee shall serve as the Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation, with such duties, responsibilities and authority as are
commensurate and consistent with her position, as may be, from time to time, assigned to her by the Chief Executive Officer (the
“CEO”) of the Corporation. The Employee shall report directly to the Board. During the Term (as defined in
Section 3), the Executive shall devote her full business time and efforts to the performance of her duties hereunder unless otherwise
authorized by the Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the expenditure of reasonable amounts of time by the Executive for the
making of passive personal investments, the conduct of business affairs and charitable and professional activities shall be allowed,
provided such activities do not materially interfere with the services required to be rendered to the Corporation hereunder and
do not violate the restrictive covenants set forth in Section 9 below.


 


		2.	The
                                         terms and conditions of all other sections of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged
                                         and in full force and effect.



 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date first stated above.


[Signature
Page Follows]






    


     


    

[Signature
Page to the Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement]








	 	DRONE AVIATION HOLDING CORP.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Kendall W. Carpenter
	 	 	Name:
    Kendall W. Carpenter
Title:
    Chief Financial Officer



  


	 	FELICIA HESS
	 	 
	 		/s/ FELICIA
    hESS
	 	 	




 






    2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permit modification issued.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

      ( print page 1793)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Polly Penhale, ACA Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-8030; email:                         *ACApermits@nsf.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On November 26, 2021, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit modification request received. The permit modification was issued on January 3, 2022, to:                

Polar Latitudes Inc.

*Permit No. 2018-015*

Erika N. Davis,

Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.

[FR Doc. 2022-00442 Filed 1-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Injet Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2004 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  August 12, 2004