alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00191]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ22-6-000]


City of Azusa, California; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 23, 2021, City of Azusa, California 
submitted its tariff filing: 2022 Transmission Revenue Balancing 
Account Adjustment/Existing Transmission Contracts update, to be 
effective January 1, 2022.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov) 
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last 
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this 
time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency 
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the 
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d5b584f5e5273717473784e686d6d726f695d7b786f7e337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="561013041519383a3f383305232626392422163033243578313920">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll-free, 
(886) 208-3676 or TYY, (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link 
at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail 
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in 
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 18, 2022.

    Dated: January 4, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00191 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           OF GLOBIX CORPORATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual
report on Form 10-K/A (the "Form 10-K/A") for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2002 of Globix Corporation (the "Company").

            I, Peter K. Stevenson, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certify that:

      (i)   the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d)); and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  April 11, 2003.





                                               /s/ Peter K. Stevenson
                                               ------------------------
                                               Name: Peter K. Stevenson

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GLOBIX CORPORATION AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY GLOBIX CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION UPON REQUEST.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 5, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 128 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2022-33, CP2022-40.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2021-28583 Filed 1-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

EASTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

ex rel. BOWEN, 

 Plaintiff/Relator, 

 v. 

KARVO COMPANIES, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-936 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

JUDGE SARGUS 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOLSON 

ORDER 

The Court, having considered the United States’ Notice of Election to Intervene and Ex 

Parte Motion for Order Lifting Seal, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

 1) The seal is lifted as to the filing of this case, the complaint filed herein, the 

Notice of Election to Intervene filed by the United States, and all pleadings filed and orders 

entered subsequent to the Notice of Election to Intervene. All other pleadings filed in this case 

shall remain under seal; 

 2) The United States and Relator shall file a stipulation of dismissal of this case 

after receipt of the final payment from Defendants in accordance with the terms of the settlement 

agreement entered by the parties; and 

Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 20 Filed: 03/29/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 102
 2 

3) The Court shall retain jurisdiction to address any disputes arising under the settlement 

agreement entered by the parties. 

s/Kimberly A. Jolson 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Dated: March 29, 2021 

Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 20 Filed: 03/29/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 103
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 16-3366 (D.C. Nos. 5: 16-CV-04018-JAR, 5:07-CR-40031-JAR-1) (D. Kan.) v. DONNELL FRANCIS TIMLEY, Defendant - Appellant.

ORDER DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND DISMISSING THE APPEAL

Before BRISCOE , HARTZ , and BACHARACH , Circuit Judges.

Mr. Donnell Timley is a federal inma te who filed a motion to vacate

his sentence under 28 U. S.C. § 2255. In the motion, Mr. Timley presented constitutional challenges to his sentence. The district court dismissed the § 2255 motion on two ground s: (1) It was untimely, and (2) Mr. Timley waived the right to collaterally atta ck his sentence. Mr. Timley wants to appeal. To do so, he se eks a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in fo rma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (certificate of appealability), 1915(a)( 1) (leave to proceed in forma pauperis). FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### April 21, 2017

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 We can issue a certificate of appe alability only if the underlying rulings on timeliness and waiver were at least reasonably debatable. See Laurson v. Leyba , 507 F.3d 1230, 1232 (10th Cir. 2007) (holding that when the district court denies a habeas petit ion based on timeliness, the court of appeals can issue a certificate of appeal ability only if the district court’s ruling on timeliness is at least reasonably debatable). In seeking a certificate of appeal ability, Mr. Timley reurges the merits of his underlying claims. But he does not address the timeliness of his § 2255 motion or say wh y he thinks the district court erred in finding a waiver through th e plea agreement. Though Mr. Timley is pro se, we cannot craft arguments for him. Garrett v. Selby C onnor Maddux & Janer , 425 F.3d 836, 840 (1 0th Cir. 2005). Because Mr. Timley does not question the district court’s reasons for dismissing the § 2255 moti on, we deny a certificate of appealability. As a result, we must dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c )(1)(B). And in the absence of a reasonably debatable appeal point, we deny Mr. Timley’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Rolland v. Primesource Staffing, L.L.C. , 497 F.3d 1077, 1079 (10th Cir. 2007).

Entered for the Court

Robert E. Bacharach Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 3.1.5

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              GO-RACHELS.COM CORP.

         The undersigned, Lawrence J. Castriotta, the President of
Go-Rachels.com Corp., a Minnesota corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby
certifies that he is the President of the Corporation and that:

         1. The name of the Corporation is Go-Rachels.com Corp.;

         2. That pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the
Minnesota Business Corporation Act at Section 302A.139, that the Board of
Directors and Shareholders duly authorized and approved the following amendment
of the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation on September 17, 2001: RESOLVED,
that Article I of the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation shall be amended
to state, in its entirety, as follows:

                                    ARTICLE I

                                      NAME

         THE NAME OF THIS CORPORATION IS RACHEL'S GOURMET SNACKS, INC.



         Except as expressly amended by the provisions hereof, the terms and
provisions contained in the Articles of Incorporation and any previous
amendments thereto shall continue in full force and effect.

         I swear that the foregoing is true and accurate and that I have the
authority to sign these Articles of Amendment on behalf of the Corporation.



Dated: September 17, 2001                    By: /s/ Lawrence J. Castriotta
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Lawrence J. Castriotta, Its CEO
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1134-1135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ22-5-000]


City of Riverside, California; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 23, 2021, City of Riverside, 
California submitted its tariff filing: 2022 Transmission Revenue 
Balancing Account Adjustment/Existing Transmission Contracts update, to 
be effective January 1, 2022.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

[[Page 1135]]

    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using 
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three 
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, 
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency 
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the 
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#45030017060a2b292c2b20163035352a373105232037266b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="62242730212d0c0e0b0c07311712120d101622040710014c050d14">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll-free, 
(886) 208-3676 or TYY, (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link 
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail 
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in 
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 18, 2022.

    Dated: January 4, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00189 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, John Adams, the Chief Executive Officer of Muller
Media, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 19, 2003                              /s/ John Adams
                                                    --------------
                                                    Name:    John Adams
                                                    Title:   Chairman
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Sam Azad 

City Manager, The City of Pueblo 

Pueblo Memorial Airport 

31201 Bryan Circle, Ste. 200 

Pueblo, Colorado 81 001 

Dear Mr. Azad: 

Assistant Secretary 

MAY 1 B 2015 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Thank you for your most recent letter dated April 28, 2015, regarding Essential Air Service 

("EAS") at Pueblo. As you know, the Consolidated and Further Appropriations Act, 2015, 

Public Law No. 113-235 states, "[T]hat none of the funds in this Act or any other Act shall be 

used to enter into a new contract with a community located less than 40 miles from the nearest 

small hub airport before the Secretary has negotiated with the community over a local cost 

share." As Pueblo is located less than 40 miles from Colorado Springs Airport (COS), a small 

hub, the Department is required to negotiate a local cost share with the community of Pueblo 

before entering into a new EAS contract. 

In your original letter dated March 23, 2015, the City of Pueblo proposed a 2.5 percent local cost 

share for the upcoming EAS contract award. The Department subsequently proposed a counter 

offer of7.5 percent for Pueblo's local share for a new two-year term contract. In your April28 

letter, the City of Pueblo proposed a counter offer of 5 percent for the local cost share. The 

Department has accepted Pueblo's offer and will require a 5 percent contribution of the annual 

subsidy amount for EAS provided by Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., ($1,776,448) or $88,822, from 

the City of Pueblo. Concurrent with Department practice, subsidy is paid to carriers on a 

monthly basis, in arrears, and the Department will require proof of the City's payment to Great 

Lakes prior to the Department reimbursing Great Lakes. 

The Department wishes to remind the community that only non-airport revenue may be used in 

conjunction with a subsidy to an air carrier. Airport revenue must be us'ed for the operational 

and capital costs ofthe airport, the local airport system, or other facilities owned or operated by 

the airport owner or operator and directly and substantially related to the air transportation of 

passengers or property. The Federal Aviation Administration's Policy and Procedures 

Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, 64 Fed. Reg. 7696 (Feb. 16, 1999), provides further 

details, and lists "directly subsidizing air carriers" as one example of unlawful revenue diversion. 
Mr. Sam Azad 

Page 2 

As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and my response in Docket 

DOT -OST -1999-65 89. 

Cc: Mark Lovin, Director of Aviation 

Sincerely, 

Brandon M. Belford 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4263 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4263

 To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to extend 
   for 1 year the period of temporary increase in the Medicaid FMAP.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2009

  Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Ms. DeGette, Ms. 
Schakowsky, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Pingree of 
  Maine, and Mr. Pierluisi) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to extend 
   for 1 year the period of temporary increase in the Medicaid FMAP.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Medicaid Assistance Extension 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. 1-YEAR EXTENSION OF ARRA INCREASE IN MEDICAID FMAP.

    Section 5001 of division B of the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph 
                (2);
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ``, but only for 
                the first calendar quarter of fiscal year 2011'' and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
            ``(4) fiscal year 2012 is less than the FMAP as so 
        determined for fiscal year 2008, fiscal year 2009 (after the 
        application of paragraph (1)), fiscal year 2010 (after the 
        application of paragraph (2)), or fiscal year 2011 (after the 
        application of paragraph (3)), the greatest of such FMAP for 
        the State for fiscal year 2008, fiscal year 2009, fiscal year 
        2010, or fiscal year 2011 shall be substituted for the State's 
        FMAP for fiscal year 2012, before the application of this 
        section, but only for the first calendar quarter in fiscal year 
        2012.'';
            (2) in subsection (c)(4)(C)(ii), by striking ``December 
        2009'' and ``January 2010'' and inserting ``December 2010'' and 
        ``January 2011'', respectively;
            (3) in subsection (g)(1), by striking ``September 30, 
        2011'' and inserting ``September 30, 2012''; and
            (4) in subsection (h)(3), by striking ``December 31, 2010'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 2011''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

JATOYA D. BOSTOCK,
Plaintiff,
vs. : Case No. 3:17er325

WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, : JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
LLC & RELENTLESS TOWING, INC.

Defendants.

ENTRY HOLDING MOOT PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL (DOC. #18) AND
AMENDED (DOC. #20) OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT
AS TO DEFENDANT WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC:
PROCEDURES WITH REGARD TO SERVED BUT NOT ANSWERING
DEFENDANT RELENTLESS TOWING

The pro se Plaintiff's Objections to the initial (Doc. #18) and amended (Doc. #20) to the
Magistrate Judge’s Reports are OVERRULED for the following reasons:

1. The Magistrate Judge does not appear to have rendered any decision in the
captioned matter; and,

2. On March 16, 2018, this Court vacated the default entered by the Clerk in favor of
the Plaintiff and against Defendant Westlake Financial Solutions, LLC (Doc. #8). Westlake has
now filed an Answer to the Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #17).

The Co-Defendant, Relentless Towing, Inc., although served has not filed an Answer.

Plaintiff may, if she wishes, file an entry seeking default against Relentless Towing, Inc.

Such is an essential first step prior to moving for default judgment.


The captioned cause is ready for a preliminary pretrial/scheduling order between the pro

se Plaintiff and Westlake Financial Solutions, LLC.

(Smid

April 18, 2018 WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

JaToya Bostock, Pro Se
Larry Greger
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington