J-A19037-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ELAINE MAGEE, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : STEVE WARNER, :

: Appellant : No. 1272 WDA 2014 Appeal from the Order entered on August 4, 2014 in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, Domestic Relations Division, No. NS200000026 PACSES Case Number 581101503 BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., JENKINS and MUSMANNO, JJ. MEMORANDUM BY MUSMANNO, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 Steve Warner (“Warner”) appeals from the Order req uiring him to remit a lump sum child support payment of $100.00 b y July 7, 2014, and $500.00 by October 7, 2014; maintain his child supp ort obligation of $175.00 per month; and provide the trial court with updated medical documentation of his ongoing disability. We affirm

. On July 16, 2012, the trial court entered an Order requiring Warner to pay child support to Elaine Magee (“Magee”) for the parties minor child, R.W. (d.o.b. 7/7/99), in the amount of $175.00 per month , and requiring Warner to pay arrearages of $300.62 immediately. Trial Co urt Order, 7/16/12. On appeal, this Court affirmed the trial court’s child support Order. Magee v.

Warner , 96 A.3d 1095 (Pa. Super. 2014) (unpublished memor andum).J-A19037-15

- 2 -

Relevant to this appeal, on May 5, 2014, Magee fil ed a contempt Petition against Warner, alleging that Warner was i n contempt of the trial court’s July 16, 2012 child support Order. As the trial court summarized in its Opinion, [a]t a support contempt hearing on July 7, 2014, [Warner] was not found in contempt of court for willfully vi olating a spousal support order. [Warner], however, was orde red to remit a lump sum payment of one hundred dollars on the sa me day, maintain his current obligation and provide updated medical documentation of his ongoing disability to the Erie County Support Enforcement Unit by August 7, 2014. He app ealed the [O]rder on August 4, 2014. Trial Court Opinion, 9/22/14, at 1-2. Subsequently , Warner, pro se , sent to

the trial court a “Concise Statement.” On appeal, Warner appears to challenge the trial c ourt’s Order, which required him to remit immediately the lump sum chil d support payment of $100, maintain his current child support obligation , and provide to the Erie County Support Enforcement Unit updated medical doc umentation of his ongoing disability. When evaluating a support order, this Court may onl y reverse the trial court’s determination where the order can not be sustained on any valid ground. We will not interfe re with the broad discretion afforded the trial court absent an abuse of the discretion or insufficient evidence to sustain the support order. An abuse of discretion is not merely an error of ju dgment; if, in reaching a conclusion, the court overrides or misap plies the law, or the judgment exercised is shown by the record to be either manifestly unreasonable or the product of partialit y, prejudice, bias or ill will, discretion has been abused. In a ddition, we note that the duty to support one’s child is absolute, a nd the purpose of child support is to promote the child’s best int erests.J-A19037-15

- 3 -

Morgan v. Morgan , 99 A.3d 554, 557 (Pa. Super. 2014). 1 In his appellate brief, Warner does not identify a ny evidence of record that would support his challenge. The amount of Fa ther’s current support obligation was litigated and resolved by this Court in 2014. At the hearing on Magee’s contempt Petition, Warner admitted that he has not paid child support since May 2010. N.T., 7/7/14, at 2-3, 7-8. Thus, Warner’s challenge is without any support in the record and we cannot grant him relief

on his claim.

Order affirmed. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary Date: 9/24/2015

1 We note that the trial court expressly found Warne r not to be in contempt. The trial court’s Order merely required Warner to p ay his previously determined child support obligation.