P. 1



# OAR Box 1110 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



# Document

Number: 

# 6 ) IV-H- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-82-3 9

Printed 4/14/20081:23:55PM

Sheet 6 of 156P. 2 

# i 

# r j > 

# -ei

*« oar 

### *»*.

'< < PRO* 0 

### UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e o f Ai rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1



## 6 JUL

## 198 5

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Reques t fo r OM B Clearanc e o f Reportin g an d Recordkeepin g Requirement s Associate dwit hNew Sourc e Perfonnanc e Standard s fo r Calciner s an

d Dryer s i nMinera l Industrie s FROM : Geral dA . Emlson , Directo r

Offic e o f A1 r Qualit y Plannin g and Standard s (MO-10 ) TO : C . Ronal dSmith , Directo r

Offic e o f Standard s an d Regulation s (PM-223 ) THRU : Joa nLaRoc k

Offic e o f Assistan t Administrato r fo r A1 r an d Radiatio n(ANR-443 ) Attache dar e th e Standar dFor m 8 3 (fou r copies ) an d supportin g statemen t (four , copies ) fo r requestin g clearanc e o f th e reportin g an d recordkeepin g requirement s associate dwit hth e ne w sourc e performanc e standard s fo r calciner s an d dryer s inminera l Industries . Pleas e review

thi s reques t an

d forwar di t t o th e Offic e o f Managemen t an dBudget . I f yo u hav e an y question s concernin g thi s submittal , pleas e contac t Mr . Dou g Bel l a t FT S 629-5624 . 2 Attachment s cc : Doug Bel l (MD-13 ) Ke nDurke e (MD-13 ) Stev e Goda r (MD-11 ) BobKolbinsky

(MD-13 ) Harve y Nozic k (ANR-443 ) (w/ o attachment ) Sharo nPayn e (ANR-443 ) r n i/ > <— » -?z o 2 > m *XIJ O o

" O " > o c-i . n > o r + C O •— • *-v . o r » h- H 

### > o 7* O *£ • W

— . in 7 T mmi. 

### "- ^

- n 

### < C O n > 

### *< n > • j

- ~ j C O - a v. ^•m. ft c/ » m o 

### "*"-*• . 1— 1 

### </ > C 3 

### *-^ . c/ > a (St

. • • ??. "Zm a > c, -I- I o> i- » ~s CT l 

### * *- l *-}50/ «^ l 1 C O a > t n 3

— i t n r< o o zz.CM,541-5595,MD-13

SO L 

# ¥ £.?//&. 

# ...Z£&.

>•••- • e/rj/e>4^ 

### > 

# p..... 7-/J-S 5 CONCURENCE S



# ..S.2 . 

# .£&- ^?-tz-^> 

# 33rf.^h?>: , 

# vfcBP. 3

1 

### *

I tt-Wfa. )

. *~t_J ENVIROWMEWTA L PROTECTIO M

AGENC Y 

# AP R 

# 2 5 198 8 CENTRA L DOCKE T SECTIO NP. 4

Standar d For m 83 (Re vSaptfmM f 1983

) 

# Reques t fo rOM B Revie w Importan t Read instruction s before completin g form

. D o no t us e th e sam e S F 8 3 t o request bot h a n Executive Orde r1229 1 reviewan d approva l unde r th e Paperwor k

Reductio n Act

. Answe ral l question s i n Par t I

. I f thi s request i s fo rreviewunde rE.O

. 12291
. complet e Par t I I an d sig n th e regulator ycertification

. I f thi s reques t i s fo rapprova l unde rth e Paperwor k Reductio n Act an d 5 CF R 1320 , ski p Par

t II , complet e Par

t II I an d sig n th e paperwor k certification

. Sen d thre e copie s o f thi s form , th e materia l t o b e reviewe d an a fo r paperwork—thre e copie s of th e supportin g statement , lo : Offic e o f Informatio n an d Regulator yAffairs Of f ic e o f Managemen t an d Budget Attention : Docke t Ubrary , Roo m 320 1 Washington

. D

C 2050 3 PAR TI.—Complet e Thi s Par t fo r Al l Requests . 1
. Department/agencyan d Bureau/offic e originatin g request 

### U . S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y Offic e o f Ai r andRadiatio n 3
. Nam e o f perso n wh o ca n best answe rquestion s regardin g thi s reques t 

### Davi dPainte r OAQPS/ESED/SD B (MD-13 ) Telephon e number 

### (FT S ) 629-557 8 4
. Titl e of informatio n collectio n o rrulemakin g 

### New Sourc e Performanc e Standard s fo r Calciner s an dDryer s i nMinera l Industries--(IC RNo. )

5
. lega l authorityfo rinformatio n collectio n o rrul e Cor e Uh'tec States Code, PUDIIC

Law, or Executive

Order) 

### 4 2 .us e 

## 7411 , 

## 741 4 .or . 6
. Affecte d publi c(check all that apply) 1 O Individual s o rhousehold s 2 C H Stat e o rloca l government s 3 D Farm s 4 5 ] Businesse s o rothe rfor-profi t Federa l agencie s o remployee s 6 O Non-pro f i t institution s 7 O Smal l businesse s o rorganization s PAR T11. —Complet e Thi s Par t Onl y i f th e Reques t i s fo r OM B Revie wUnde r Executiv e Orde r 1229 1 7
. Regulatio n Identifie rNumbe r(RIN )
or . Non e assigne d D 8
. Typ e o f submissio n (cneck

one in each category) Classification

Stage of development 1 O Majo r1 L J Propose d o rdraf t 2 L J Nonmajo r2 U Fina l o rinteri m final, wit h prio rproposa l 3 L J Fina l o rinteri m final , withou t pno rproposa l Type of review requested 1 D Standard 2 D Pendin g 3 Q Emergenc

y 4 L J Statutor

yo rjudicia l deadlin e 9
. CFR sectio n affecte d

CF R

_ 10
. Doe s thi s regulatio n contai n reportin g o rrecordkeepin g requirement s tha t require OM B approva l unde rth e Paperwor k Reductio n Ac

t an d 5 CFR 1320 ? O Ye s G N

o 1 D Ye s 2 G N

o Certificatio n fo r Regulator y Submission s I n submittin g thi s request fo rOM B review , th e authorize d regulator ycontact an d th e progra m officia l certif ytha t th e requirementso f E.O

. 1229 1 an d anyspoiicatf e polic ydirective s have bee n complie d with

. Signature o

f progra m officia l
Signature o f authorize d regulator ycontact Date

Date 12
. (OMB

use only)
Previous eflition. i ootowt e 8 3 10 8 NS N 7540-00-634-403- J Sunfljr d Form 8 3 ,Se » 9 83 / Preserve s o

yOM 3 5CFR1320anflii O 1229*

.P. 5



### PAR TIII.—Complet e Thi s Par t Only i f th e Reques

t i s fo r Approva l o

f a Collectio n ~ ~ — o f Informatio n Unde r th e Paperwor k Reductio n Ac

t an d 5 CFR 1320 . 13 . Abstract—Describ e needs , use s an d affecte d publi c i n 5 0 wort s o r les s 

### Th e NSP S affec t owner s o r operator s o f plant s tha t proces s mineral s i n calciner s o r dryers . The owner s o r operator s mus t submi t semiannua l report s t o enabl e th e Administrato r t o identif ynew , modified , o r reconstructe d source s subjec t t o th e standard s and t o ensur * tha t the standard s ar e bein g achieved . e 14 . Typ e of informatio n collectio n (check only one) Information

collections

not contained

in rulea 1 Q Regula r submissio n Information

collections

contained

In rules 3 0 Existin g regulatio n (n o chang a proposal ) 4 3 Notic e o fpropose d rulemakin g (NPRM ) 5 D Final . NPR M wa s previousl y publishe d 2 Q Emergenc y submissio n (certification attached)
6 Fina l o r interi m fina l without , prio r NPR M A D Regula r submissio n B Q Emergenc y submissio n (certification attached) 7 . Ente r dat e ofexpecte d o r actuaiF-sr :

Registe r publicatio n a t thi s stag e ofr » - . 

### (month, day, yetp:January 27 . 15 . Type o f revie wrequeste d (check only one) 1 E Ne wcollectio n 2 Q Revisio n o f a currentl y approve d collectio n 3 Q Extensio n of th e expiratio n dat e o f a currentl y approve d collectio n withou t an y chang a i n th e substanc e o r i n th e metho d ofcollectio n 4 O Reinstetcmsn t of a previousl y appros>e d collectio n fo r whic h approva l ha s expire d 5 Q Existin g collectio n i n us e withou t a n OM B contro l numbe r 16 . Agency repor t for m numbers ) (include standard/optional

form numbers))

17 . Annua l reportin g o r disclosur e burde n 1 Numbe r o f respondent s . 2 Numbe r o f response s pe r responden t . . 3 Tota l annua l response s (lint 1 times

line 2) 4 Hour s pe r respons e 5 Tota l hour s (line

3 times line 4) * . . .. . 22 . Purpos e o f informatio n collectio n (check as many as apply) 1 Q Applicatio n fo r benefit s 2 D Progra m evaluatio n 3 D Genera l purpos e statistic s 4 E Regulator y o r complianc e 5 D Progra m plannin g o f manegemen t 6 D Resaaref * 

### 7 •Audi t 18 . Annua l recordkeepin g burde n 1 Numbe r o f recordkeeper s 2 Annua l hour s pe r recordkeope r 3 Tota l recordkeepin g hour s (line 1 times line 2) 4 Recordkeepin g retentio n perio d 

### 0 2 year s 19 . Tota l annua l burde n 1 Requeste d (line

17-5 plus line 18-3). 2 I n curren t OM B inventory . . . . 3 Differenc e (line

1 less line 2)

. . . Explanation

of difference 4 Progra m chang e ...... . 5 Adjustmen t 23 . Frequenc y ofrecordkeepin g o r reporting("cftee * all that apply) 1 12 0 Recordlsespin g Reporting 2 Q O n occasio n 3 D Weekl y 4 D Monthl y 5 D Quarte-fi y 6 0 Semi-annuall y 7 L J Annuall y 8 D Bienniall y 9 Q Othe r (describe): ; , 20 . Curren t (mos t recent) OM B contro l numbe r o r commen t numbe r 2 1 . Requeste d expiratio n dat e 

## Marc h199 0 24
. Respondents ' obligatio n t o compl y(check the strongest

obligation

that app-. 1 D Voluntar y 2 Q Require d t o obtai n o r retai n a benefi t 3 2 1 Mandator y 25 . Ar e th e respondent s primaril y educationa l agencie s o r institution s o r i s th e primary purpos e o fth e collectio n relate d t o Federa l educatio n programs ? U Ye s 2 . 26 . Doe s th e agenc y us e samplin g t o selec t respondent s o r doe s th e agenc y recommen d o r prescrib e th e us e o fsamplin g o r statistica l analysi s b y respondents ? L i Ye s ix

. 27 . Regulatory authorit y fo r th e informatio n collectio n 

### 4 U CFR . 

# wm F R . * . or . Othe r (specify): Paperwor k

Certi fIcatio n I n submittin g thi s reques t fo r I

. Privac y Ajl^wtisTtca l stan a (-.approval , th e agenc y head , th e senio r officia l o r a n authorize d representative , certifie s tha t th e requirement s o f5 CF R 132 0 ordirectiveaoan d an y ot&e r artf^Dcabl e informatio n policy directive s hav e oee n complie d with . Signatur e o

fprogr j 

### directo r o f th e Office(dt"Ai r QualiT y Plannin g an d Standard s Oature o t agency head , tn e senio r officia l o r a n autnorfze O rep'r*isentat.. e 031 6 

### / 

# mis 

# A
Date /P. 6



### SUPPORTIN

GSTATEMEN

T FO R STANDARD FOR

M 8 3

REPORTIN

GAN D RECORDKEEPIN

GREQUIREMENT S FO

RTHE NE W SOURC E PERFORMANCE STANDARD S FO R CALCINER S AN

D DRYER S I

N MINERA L INDUSTRIE S

A . JUSTIFICATIO

N 1 . Nee d fo r th e Informatio

nCollection . Th

e U . S . Environmenta l Protectio

nAgency

(EPA ) i s charge

d under Sectio

n11 1 o f th

e Clea nAi r Act , a s amended , to establis hstandard s o f performanc e fo r ne w stationar

y
source s tha t reflect :

. . . applicatio

no f th e bes t technologica l syste m o f continuou s emissio nreductio

nwhich(takin

g into consideratio nth e cos t o f achievin

g suc hemissio

nreductio

nan d an y nonai r quality

health an d environmenta l impac t an d energ y requirements ) th

e Administrator determine s ha s bee

nadequatel y

demonstrate

d [Sectio

n111(a)(1)] . Sectio n111(e ) furthe r states : Afte r th

e effectiv

e dat e o f standard s o f performanc e promulgate d under thi s Section , i t shal l be unlawfu l fo r an yowne r o r operato r o f an yne w sourc e to operat e suc h sourc e i n violatio n o f an y standar d o f performanc e applicabl e t o suc h source . I nth e Administrator' s judgment , particulat e matte r emission s fro mcalciner s an

d dryer s i n minera l industrie s cause , o r contribut e significantl yto , ai r pollutio n tha t ma yreasonabl yb e anticipate d t o endange r publi c healt h o r welfare . Consequently , ne wsourc e performanc e standard s (NSPS ) hav e bee n develope d fo r thi s sourc e categoryan d are currentl ybeing processe d fo r proposa l in th e FEDERA L REGISTER . Certai n record s an

d report s ar e necessar yt o enabl e th e Administrato r to : (1 ) identif ynew , modified , o r reconstructe dP. 7



### source s subjec t t o the standard s an d(2 ) ensur e tha t standard s base d
onbes t demonstrate dtechnolog y (BDT ) ar e bein g achieved . 2 . Descriptio nandPractica l Utilit y o f th e Informatio n Collectio nActivity .

a . Descriptio no f Informatio nCollectio nActivit y fo r Calciner s andDryer s i nMinera l Industries . Report s o f star t o f construction , anticipate dan dactua l startu p dates , an

dphysica l o r operationa l change s t o existin g facilitie s ar e require dt o identif y affecte dsources . Report s o f initia l performanc e test s ar e necessar y t o determin e tha t BD T i s bein g used . Record s o f startups , shutdowns , o r malfunction s i nth e operatio no f affecte d facilitie s an dassociate dcontro l equipment , record s o f opacit y an d contro l devic e monitorin g parameters , andothe r informatio nrequire d by th e standard s ar e necessar y t o determin e prope r operatio nand maintenance . Failur e t o collec t thi s informatio nwoul dallow circumventio no f th e standards .

b . EPA Us e o f Dat a Collected . Th e informatio nwil l be use d b y Agenc y enforcemen t personne l (1 ) t o identif y new , modified , an

d reconstructe dsource s subjec t t o th e standards , (2 ) t o ensur e tha t BD T i s bein g properl y applied , an

d(3 ) t o ensur e tha t th e emissio n contro l devic e i s bein g properl y operate dan

dmaintaine do

na continuou s basis . I naddition , record s andreport s ar e necessar y t o enabl e EPA

t o identif y

plant s tha t ma y

no t b e i ncomplianc e wit hth e standards . Base donreporte dinformation , EPA ca ndecid e whic hplant s shoul db e inspecte dandwha t record s o r processe s shoul db e inspecte da t th eP. 8



### plant . Th e record s tha t plant s woul d maintai n woul d indicat e whethe r plant s ar e properl yoperating an d maintainin g contro l equipment . 3 . Minimizin g Burden . Th e Agenc ydoe s no t as k th e respondent s t o reduc e th e data , onl yt o submi t th e recorde d log s semiannuall yfo r thos e period s o f norma l operatio n during whic h th e 1 0 percen t opacit y limi t fo r dr

ycontro l device s i s exceede d or , fo r we t scrubbers , th e pressur e drop varie s b ymor e tha n ±1 0 percen t o r th e liqui d flo wrat e varie s b

ymor e tha n ±2 0 percen t o f th e averag e value s determine d during complianc e testing . Thus , th e burde n wil l b e minimize d fo r thos e respondent s wh o properl yoperat e an d maintai n thei r syste mt o compl ywit h th e standards . I n addition , th e analysi s o f th e burde n t o th e 1 7 industrie s showe d tha t th e burde n coul d b e furthe r reduce d i n two industrie s b yproviding that , i n lie u o f a continuou s opacit y monitorin g system , th e owne r o r operato r o f a gypsu mflas h o r kettl e calcine r o r o f a perlit e rotar ydrye r o r expansio n furnac e wh o use s a drycontro l devic e ma yhav e a certifie d visibl e emission s observe r
measur e an

d record thre e 6-minut e average s o f th e opacit yo f visibl e emission s t o th e atmospher e onc e pe r wee k o f operatio n i n accordanc e wit h EP AReferenc e Metho d 9 . 4 . Nonduplication . Acompute r searc h o f th e Federa l Informatio n Locato r Syste

mindicate d tha t ther e ar e n o simila r informatio n request s being carrie d ou t b ythe Federa l Government . Asimila r searc h o f EPA' s ongoing Informatio n Collectio n Request s (ICR's ) reveale d no duplicatio n o f informatio n gathering efforts . However , certai n report s require d b

yStat e o r loca l agencie s mayduplicat e informatio n require d b

yth e recommende d standards . In such cases , a cop yo f the report s submitte d t o the Stat e o r loca l agenc ycan be provide d t o th eP. 9



### Administrator i

nlie uo f th e report s require

d b y th e recommende

d standards. , 5 . Consideratio

nof Alternatives . Ther e are n o practica l alternative s fo

r gatherin

g thi s informatio

nother tha

nth e alternativ

e note d i nparagrap

h4 . 6 . Minimizin

g o f Burde

nfo r Smal l Business . Som e smal l organization s ma

y b e affecte

d b y th e recommende

d NSPS . However , th e informatio

ncollectio

nrequirement s are th e minimu

m necessar

y t o demonstrat e compliance . Th e EP A ha s criticall y

reviewe

d th e reportin

g
an d recordkeepin

g requirement s associate d withth

e recommende

d standard s fo r minera l calciner s an d dryer s an

d ha s reduce

d recordkeepin

g an d reportin

g requirement s to dat a tha t are essentia l t o bothth e responden t
an d EP A t o ensur e prope r operatio nan d maintenanc e o f contro l equipment . 7 . Consideratio

no f Collection . Mos t o f th e informatio

ncollectio

n requirement s fo

r calciner s an

d dryer s i

nminera l industrie s are one-time-onl y

notification s o

r report s an

d canno t b

e performed o

na les s frequent basis . Thes e requirement s includ e th e notificatio

no f constructio n or reconstruction , notificatio nof anticipate d startup , notificatio n o f actua l startup , notificatio n o f th e initia l performanc e test , an

d th e initia l performanc e tes t report . Semiannua l reporting o f exceedance s o f the opacit ylimi t fo r dr y contro l devices , exceedance s o f operating paramete r limit s fo r we t scrubbers , an

d correctiv e maintenanc e require d a s a resul t o f semiannua l calibration s o f CM S o r operating paramete r monitorin g device s i s require d t o ensur e complianc e wit h the standard s on a continuou s basis . Th e frequenc yo f thes e report s wa s chose n b yth e Agenc ya s tr s leas t frequent perio d tha t stil l ensure s tha t facilitie s subjec tP.1 0



### t o th e standard s wil l no t operat e fo r extende dperiod s i nviolatio n
o f th e standards . Les s frequen t informatio ncollectio ncoul dallow longe r period s o f time be r 

### or e poo r pollutio ncontro l operatin g and maintenanc e condition s andviolation s o f th e standard s woul db e identified . Thi s dela y woul dresul t i nhighe r emission s andpoore r ai r quality . 8 . Paperwor k Reductio nAc t Guidelines . Non e o f th e guideline s i n5 CF R1320. 6 ar e bein g exceeded . 9 . Consultations . Representative s o f th e minera l processin g industrie s andmember s o f th e Expande dShale , Clay , andSlat e Institute ; Gypsu m Association ; Industria l Ga s Cleanin g Institute ; Nationa l Industria l SandAssociation ; Perlit e Institute ; Th e Refractorie s Institute ; an dStat e ai r pollutio ncontro l agencie s wer e consulte d durin g th e developmen t o f th e standards . N o majo r problem s wer e encountere do nwhic hagreemen t coul dno t b e reached . Furthermore , th e Genera l Provision s require tha t EPA revie w NSP S 4 year s fro

m th e dat e o f promulgation . Thi s revie w wil l includ e a nassessmen t o f suc h factor s a s th e nee dfo r integratio nwit hothe r programs , th e existenc e
o f alternativ e methods , enforceability , improvement s i nemissio n contro l technology , an dreportin g requirements . Fo r thi s reason , specia l consultatio nwit hrespondent s ona 3-yea r basi s shoul dno t be necessary . 10 . Confidentiality . Any informatio nsubmitte dt o th e Agenc y fo r whic ha clai m

o f confidentialit y i s mad e wil l be safeguarde d accordin g t o th e Agency' s policie s se t fort hinTitl e 40 , Chapte r 1 , Par t 2 , Subpar t B--Confidentialit y o f Busines s Informatio n(se e 4 0 CFR2 ; 4 1 F

R36902 , Septembe r 1 , 1976 ; amende db y 4 3 F R39999 ,P.1 1



### Septembe r 8 , 1978 ; 4 3 F R42251 , Septembe r 28 , 1978 ; 4 4 F R17674 , Marc h23 , 1979) . Furthermore , th e typ e o f informatio ntha t i s bein g collecte db

y EPA i s no t expecte dt o b e considere dconfidentia l i n
mos t cases . 11 . Sensitiv e Questions . Th'. s sectio ni s no t applicabl e becaus e thi s IC Rdoe s no t involv e matter s o f a sensitiv e nature . 12 . Cos t t o th e Governmen t an dt o th e Respondents . a . Cos t t o th e Federa l Government . Th e Federa l Governmen t wil l no t incu r an

y developmen t cost s becaus e th e informatio ncollectio n requirement s wer e develope da s anincidenta l par t o f developin g th e standards . Furthermore , th e Federa l Governmen t wil l no t incu r an y operatio ncost s becaus e reportin g an drecordkeepin g requirement s o n th e par t o f th e respondent s ar e require dunde r Sectio n11 1 o f th e Clea nAi r Act . N o Federa l cost s ca nb e directl y attribute dt o th e ICRbecaus e publicatio nan ddistributio no f th e informatio nar e par t
o f th e Complianc e Dat a System a s discusse di nSectio n15 . Also , ther e wil l b e no additiona l cost s associate dwithexaminatio no f th e record s t o b e maintaine db y th e respondent s becaus e th e examinatio n i s already

a par t o f EPA' s periodi c inspectio no f sources , whic hi s par t o f EPA' s overal l complianc e an denforcemen t program . Th e onl y cost s tha t th e Federa l Governmen t wil l incu r ar e use r cost s associate d wit hth e analysi s o f th e reporte dinformation . Th e averag e annua l Federa l cos t durin g th e firs t 3 year s o f th e IC Ri s estimate dt o be $76,108 . Thi s cos t i s base dona naverag e wag e o f $14.0 0 pe r hou r an da 11 0 percen t overhea drate . Detail s upo nwhic hthi s estimat e i s base dar e presente di nTable s 1 an d2 fo r affecte dfacilitie s controlle db y dry contro l device s an dwe t scrubbers ,P.1 2



## TABL E 1 . ANNUA L ESTIMAT E O F DIREC T PERSONNE L COST S T O TH E FEDERA L GOVERNMEN

TFO R FACILITIE S CONTROLLE D B YDR YCONTRO L DEVICE S

8urde nite

m Hour s pe r ocur renc e (A ) 08.2 b 89.6 d Occur rence s pe r facilit y pe r yea r (B ) 1 1 Hour s pe r facilit y pe r y.&r (C=Axa )
308. 2 89. 6 Facilitie s

pe r yea r (0 ) 2.6 C 0.3 e Hour s

pe r yea r (E=CxD )
801. 3 28. 9 Dollar s

pe r year 1 . Initia l Performanc e Tes t •Affecte dfacilit

y 2 . Repea t Performanc e Tes t • Affecte

d facilit

y 3 . Repor t Revie

w
• Affected facility Notificatio

no f construction / reconstructio

n Notificatio

no f anticipated startu p Notificatio

no f actua l startu p Notificatio

no f initia l performanc e tes t Revie w emissio

ntes t result s Notificatio

no f demonstrationo f continuou s monitorin g syste m (CHS ) Notificatio

no f physica l or operationa l change s Revie w CH S o r Referenc e Metho d 9 demonstration Revie w o f exces s emissionreport s TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S i . 4 . Trave l Expense s for Test s Attende d (( 1 person)(7. 7 facilities/yr ) ( 1 day/facility ) ($5 0 pe r diem) ) + (($400/roun

d trip ) (7. 7 roun

dtrips/yr) ) 5 . Salary 1 ( 1 person)(tota l annua l hours)($29.40/h ) TOTA L ANNUA L COST S (trave l expense s • salary ) 32.1 ' 64. 2 2 2 2 8 2 N/A 9 L 6 8 1

1 1 1 1
1 l 1 2

2 2 8 2
1 6 8 32. 1

32. 1 32. 1 32. 1 32. 1

17.3 h 48 . I* * 64. 2

64. 2 64. 2 256. 8 64. 2

276. 8 384. 8 2,069. 6 3,465.0 0

60,787.4 4 64,252.4 4
?Assum e one affectedfacility pe r respondent . Numbe r o f affectedfacilitie s wa s roundedt o one-tenth . Assum e enforcemen t personne l atten d8 percen t o f intitia l tests , 32. 1 affectedfacilitie s tested , an deac h tes t attended b

y enforcemen t personne l require s 12 0 person-hours . d Assume enforcemen t personne l atten d 8 percen t o f initia l test s an d32. 1 affectedfacilitie s tested . Assum e 2 0 percen t failur e rat e fo r 32. 1 affecte

dfacilitie s t o determine th e numbe r o f violations , 8 person-hour s fo

r eac hviolatio

nnotice , 8 person-hour s i nconferenc e wit hfacility operator s prio r to retesting , an

d one-hal f o f th

e tim e a tes t indicatin

g noncomplianc e wit hth e standar

dca nb e attributed to correctabl e condition s an d ca nb e reteste

dimmediately . ^Assum e enforcemen t personne l atten d 1 0 percen t o f retest s an d 3. 2 affectedfacilitie s retested . Expec t 150. 5 affecte d facilitie s i

nfirs t 5 year s afte r proposa l of th e NSP S or 32. 1 affectedfacilitie s pe r year . "No t applicable . Existin g facilitie s are expecte d to becom

e affecte

dfacilitie s becaus e the y are replace

dS y .ne w facilitie s rather tha nbecaus e o f physica l o r operationa l change s (modifications) . Onl y 17. 3 o f th

e 32. 1 affected facilitie s wil l b e require

dt o demonstrat e a continuou s monitorin g syste m .(CMS ) to monito r opacity durin g a performanc e test . '.Ass'jm e responden t wil l submi t on e repor t of exces s emission s per year . J A naverag e o f 48. 1 facilitie s wil l incu r cost s o f semiannua l reportin g an drecordkeepin

g requirement s over k 3 year s afte r proposa l o f th e NSPS . Test s attende

d = 2. 6 (initia l tests ) +0. 3 (repea t tests ) + 4. 8 (exces s emission s enforcemen t tests ) =7. 7 tests . Assum e EP A personne l wil l atten d 1 0 percent o f repea t test s an d1 0 percen t o f exces s emission s enforcemen t tests . Exces s emission s enforcemen t test s =0. 1 (personne l attendance ) x .43. 1 (facilitie s reportin g exces s emissions ) = 4. 8 tests . C;;*c s are base

d o nth e rat e o f pa

y of a governmen t employe e a t Grad e 10 , Ste

p7 , whichis currentl y S1^." 0 per hour , an d o na noverhea

drat e o f 11 0 percent . Thus , th e cos t is S29.4 0 per hour .P.1 3



## TABL E 2 . ANNUA L ESTIMAT E O F DIREC T PERSONNE L COST S T O TH E FEDERA L GOVERNMEN T FO R FACILITIE S CONTROLLE D B Y WE T SCRUBBER S

Burde nite m Hour s pe r ocur renc e (A ) 72b 21d Occur rence s pe r facilit y pe r yea r (B ) 1 1 Hour s pe r fa c i1it y pe r yea r (C=AxB ) 72 21 Facilitie s Hour s

pe r yea r pe r yea r (D ) (E=CxO ) Oollar s pe r yea r 1 . Initia l Performanc e Tes t • A' f acte dfacilit y 2 . Repea t Performanc e Tes t • A'feete dfacilit y 3 . Repor t Review • Affecte dfacilit y Notificatio no f construction / reconstructio n Notificatio no f anticipate dstartup Notificatio no f actua l startup Notificatio no f initia l performanc e tes t Review emissio ntes t result s Notificatio no f demonstratio no f we t scrubbe r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s (OPHO ) Notificatio no f physica l o r operationa l change s Revie w we t scrubbe r OPH O repor t Revie w o f exces s emissio nreport s TOTAL ANNUAL HOUR S | r 4 . Trave l Expense s fo r Test s Attende d (( 1 person)(1. 8 facilities/yr ) ( 1 day/facility ) ($5 0 pe r diem) ) • (($400/roun dtrip ) (1. 8 roundtrips/yr) ) 5 . Salary 1 ( 1 person)(tota l annua l hours)($29.40/h ) TOTA L ANNUAL COST S (trave l expense s • salary ) N/A 9 N/A " 1 6 8 1 6 8 0.6 1
-

0.1 C

7.5 '

7. 5

7.5 . 11.3 J 43. 2

2. 1

15. 0 2 2 2 1

1 1 2

2 2 7. 5

7. 5 7. 5 15. 0

15. 0 15. 0 60. 0

120. 0 90. 4 375. 7 810.0 0

11,045.5 8 11,855.5 8 .Assum e on e affecte dfacilit y pe r respondent . Numbe r o f affecte dfacilitie s wa s rounde dt o one-tenth . Assum e enforcemen t personne l atten d8 percen t o f intitia l tests , 7. 5 affecte dfacilitie s tested , andeac h tes t attende dby

enforcemen t personne l require s 12 0 person-hours . .Assum e enforcemen t personne l atten d8 percen t o f initia l test s an d7. 5 affecte dfacilitie s tested . Assum e 2 0 percen t failur e rat e fo r 7. 5 affecte dfacilitie s t o determin e th e numbe r o f violations , 8 person-hour s fo r eac hviolatio nnotice , 8 person-hour s inconferenc e withfacilit y operato r prio r t o retesting , andone-hal f o f th e time a tes t indicatin g noncomplianc e wit hth e standar dca n b e attribute d t o correctabl e condition s andca nbe reteste dimmediately . -Assum e enforcemen t personne l atten d1 0 percen t o f retest s an d 0. 8 affecte dfacilitie s retested . Expec t 37. 5 affecte dfacilitie s i n firs t 5 year s afte r proposa l o f th e NSP S o r 7. 5 affecte d facilitie s pe r year . ?No t applicable . Existin g facilitie s ar e expecte d t o becom e affecte d facilitie s becaus e the yar e replace d b yne wfacilitie s •rathe r tha n becaus e o f physica l o r operationa l change s (modifications) . •Assum e responden t wil l submi t on e repor t o f exces s emission s pe r year . ^An averag e o f 11. 3 facilitie s wil l incu r cost s o f semiannua l reportin g an d recordkeepin g requirement s ove r

. 3 year s afte r proposa l o f th e NSPS . Test s attende d = 0. 6 (initia l tests ) •* • 0. 1 (repea t tests ) + 1. 1 (exces s emission s enforcemen t tests ) = 1. 8 tests . Assum e EP Apersonne l wil l atten d 1 0 percen t o f repea t test s an d 1 0 percen t o f exces s emission s enforcemen t tests . Exces s emission s enforcemen t test s =0. 1 (personne l attendance ) x ,11. 3 (facilitie s reportin g exces s emissions ) = 1. 1 tests . Cost s ar e base d o n th e rat e o f Da yo f a governmen t employe e a t Grad e 10 . Ste D 7 . whic hi s currentl y $14.C O pe r hour , an d o n a n overhea d rat e o f 11 0 percent . Thus , th e cos t i s 529.4 0 pe r hour .



# 8

### P. H



### respectively . A

breakdow

no f cost s b

y cos t categor

y i s presente

d belo w fo r th e tota l o f th

e tw o type s o f devices : Direc t Personne l Cost s $71,83 3 (includin

g overhead ) Othe r Direc t Cost s $ 4,27 5 (travel ) Tota l $76,10 8 b . Cos t to th

e Respondents . Respondent s are owner s or operator s o f minera l calcine r an d dryer facilitie s fo r whichconstruc tion , modification , o r reconstructio

nwil l commenc e afte r th e dat e of proposa l o f th

e standards . Th

e cos t t o industr

y for a representativ e responden t fo

r th e firs t yea r i s presente d i nTabl e 3 . A

representativ

e respondent wa s assume d to b e a respondent wh

o woul d b

e require

dto fulfil l al l one-time-onl y reportin

g an d recordkeepin

g requirement s
an d al l semiannua l an d recurrent reportin g an d recordkeepin

g requirement s associate

d withmaintainin

g a CMS fo

r a dr y contro l devic e o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s fo

r a we t scrubber . Th e tota l number o f hour s fo

r al l burde

nitem s woul d b

e 54 1 hour s fo

r a dr y contro l devic e an

d 44 3 hour s fo

r a we t scrubber . Th e tota l numbe r o f hour s fo r one-time-onl y

burde nitem s woul d b

e 43 9 hour s fo r a dr y contro l devic e an

d 34 1 hour s fo

r a we t scrubber . Th e tota l numbe r o f hour s fo r semiannua l an

d recurren t burde n items woul d b e 10 2 hour s pe r yea r fo r bot ha dr y contro l devic e an

d a we t scrubber . Th e tota l cos t o f al l burde n item s in the firs t yea r woul d be $15,90 5 fo r a dr ycontro l devic e an

d $13,02 4 fo r a we t scrubber . However , recurren t cost s o f the require d reporting an d recordkeeping t o a representativ e responden t shoul d be onl ya smal l fractio n o f th e first-yea r cost s becaus e 43 9 hour s o f th e estimate d 54 1 hour s fo r dr y contro l device s an

d 34 1 hour s o f th e estimate d 44 3 hour s fo r we tP.1 5



## TABL E 3 . COS T T O INDUSTR YFO RA REPRESENTATIVE RESPONDEN T FO RTH E FIRS T YEA

R

Burde nite

m Hour s pe r occur renc e (A ) No . o f

occurrence s pe r yea r (B ) Hour s pe r

responden t pe r yea r (C=AxB ) 1 . REPORTINGREQUIREHENT S A . Rea dinstruction s B . Require dactivitie s Initia l performanc e tes t 33 0 Demonstratio no f continuou s monitorin g syste m (CHS ) 100 , 2 o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s (OPHO ) Recalibratio no f CH S o r OPM O (semiannual ) 4 C . Writ e repor t Notificationo f construction/reconstructio n2 Notificatio no f anticipate dstartu p2 Notificatio no f actua l startup2 Notificatio no f initia l performanc e tes t 2 Report s o f exces s emission s (recurrent ) 1 6 a.b

4 . RECORDKEEPINGREQUIREHENT S A . Time t o ente r informatio n Record s o f startup , shutdown , malfunction , etc . (recurrent ) 1. 5 Record s o f al l measurement s an dinformatio nrequire dI. S b y th e standar d(recurrent ) TOTA L ANNUAL HOUR S TOTAL ANNUAL COST S ($) ° (Tota l annua l hours)($29.40/h ) 

# i.i 48v 100 , 330 a 2 a 8
2 2 2 2 1 6

6 7 2 541,443 " 15,905.40 : 13,024.20 s Th e firs t numbe r correspond s t o a representativ e facilit y controlle db

y a dry contro l devic e andth e second .numbe r correspond s t o a representativ e facilit y controlle db

y a we t scrubber . ".Assum e i t wil l tak e 1 hou r eac ht o demonstrat e pressur e los s an dliqui dflo

w rat e monitorin g devices . ^Assum e a representativ e facilit y wil l b e operate d4 8 week s pe r year . Cost s ar e base donth e rat e o f pay o f a governmen t employe e a t Grad e 10 , Ste p7 , whic hI s currentl y $14.0 0 pe r hour , an

dona noverhea drat e o f 11 0 percent . Thus , th e cost s i s $29.4 0 pe r hour .



## 1 0P.1 6



### scrubber s ar e associate dwit hth e initia l performanc e test s an d notificatio nrequirements , whic har e require donl y once . Cost s o f
recurren t burde nitem s t o a representativ e responden t shoul dbe abou t $3,00 0 pe r yea r fo r bot hdry contro l device s an dwe t scrubbers . Th e tota l annua l burde no f reportin g an drecordkeepin g requirement s
o f affecte dfacilitie s controlle db y dr y contro l device s o r we t scrubber s i nth e firs t 3 year s afte r proposa l i s presente di nTable s 4
an d5 , respectively . I t i s estimate dtha t ther e wil l b e 4 0 respondent s pe r yea r fo r th e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . O f th e 4 0 respondents , i t i s expecte dtha t 3 2 wil l b e usin g dr y contro l device s an d8 wil l b e usin g we t scrubbers . Respondent s ar e require db y la w t o submi t one-time-onl y reports , whic hinclud e al l o f th e "notification " report s liste dunde r Ite m 3 E
o f Table s 3 and4 . I naddition , th e respondent s woul db e require dt o submi t semiannua l report s containin g informatio no nthos e period s o f
norma l operatio ndurin g whic hth e 1 0 percen t opacit y limi t fo r dr y contro l device s i s exceede dor , fo r we t scrubbers , th e pressur e dro p varie s b

y mor e tha n±1 0 percen t o r th e liqui dflow rat e varie s b

y
mor e tha n±2 0 percen t o f th e averag e value s determine ddurin g complianc e testing . Th e respondent s als o woul db e require dt o submi t semiannua l report s tha t documen t correctiv e maintenanc e require da s a resul t o f semiannua l calibration s o f monitorin g devices . Th e tota l averag e
annua l cos t t o th e respondent s durin g the firs t 3 year s o f th e IC Ri s estimate dt o be $727,141 . Thi s cos t i s base do na tota l averag e
annua l burde no f 24,73 3 person-hour s fo r 4 0 respondent s an da naverag e wag e o f $14.0 0 pe r hou r plu s a 11 0 percen t overhea drate .



## 1 1P.1 7



## TABL E 4 . ANNUA

L BURDE N O F REPORTIN

GAN DRECORDKEEPIN

GREQUIREMENT S OF FACILITIE S CONTROLLE DB YDR YCONTRO L DEVICE S THAT ARE SUBJEC T TO TH E NSP S AFTER(DAT E OF PROPOSAL )

Burde nite

n Hour s pe r ocur renc e (A ) Occur rence s pe r Hour s pe r responden t responden t pe r yea r pe r yea r (8 ) (C=AxB ) Respondent s

pe r yea r (D ) Hour s

pe r yea r (E=Cx0 ) Oollar s

pe r yea r . (F=Ex29.40) ° 1 . Application s 2 . Survey s an

dStudie s 3 . Reportin g Requirement s A . ReadInstruction s B . Require dActivitie s Initia l performanc e tes t Repea t o f performanc e tes t Demonstratio no f continuou s monitorin g syste

m (CMS ) Repea t o f demonstratio no f CM S Referenc e Metho d9 tes t Repea t o f Referenc e Metho d9 tes t Recalibratio no f CM S (semiannual ) C . Creat e Informatio n D . Gathe r Existing Infonnatio n E . Writ e Repor t Notificatio no f construction / reconstructio n Notificatio no f physical/operationa l change s Notificatio no f anticipate dstartup Notificatio no f actua l startup Notificatio no f initia l performanc e tes t Notificatio no f demonstratio no f CM S Report s o f exces s emission s (recurrent ) Repor t o f performanc e tes t Repor t o f CM S demonstratio n
4 . Recordkeepin g Requirement s A . Rea d Instruction s B . Pla n Activitie s C . Implemen t Activitie s D . Develo p Recor d Syste m E . Tim e t o Ente r Informatio n Record s o f startup , shutdown , malfunction , etc . (recurrent ) Record s o f al l measurement s and informatio n require d b yth e standard s (recurrent ) Record s o f exces s emission s (recurrent ) N/A c N/ A
1
33 0 33 0 10 0 N/ A 1 8 1 8 4 Include d in3 B Include d I n3 E 1

0.2 d 1

0.2 d 2 1

33 0 6 6 10 0
1 8 3. 6 8 32. 1

32. 1 32. 1 17. 3
14. 8 14. 8 26. 0 32. 1

10,593. 0 2,118. 6 1,730. 0
266. 4 53. 3 208. 0



### . 943.7 4

311,434.2 0 62,286.8 4 50,862.0 0 7,832.1 6 1,566.4 3 6,115.2 0

2 N/A e 2 2 2 2 1 6 Include d i n3 B Include d in3 B
Include d i n3 A Include d i n 3 8 Include d i n 3 8 N/ A 1. 5 1. 5
Include d i n 3 E 1

1 1 1 

# i '

4 ^ 48 h 2

2 2 2 2 1 6

6 7 2 32. 1

32. 1 32. 1 32. 1 17. 3 48. 1

48. 1 48. 1 64. 2

64. 2 64. 2 64. 2 34. 6 769. 6

283. 6 3,463. 2 1,887.4 8

1,887.4 8 1,887.4 8 1,887.4 8 1,017.2 4 22,626.2 4

8,434.3 4 101,813.0 8

(continued )



## 1 2P.1 8



## TABL E 4
. (continued )

Burde nite

m F . Tim e t o Trai nPersonne l G . Audit s TOTAL ANNUAL HOUR S TOTA L ANNUA

L COST S Hour s pe r ocur renc e (A ) 3 2 N/ A Occur rence s pe r responden t pe r yea r (B ) 1 Hour s pe r responden t pe r yea r (C=AxB ) 3 2 Respondent s Hour s pe r yea r pe r yea r (D ) (E=CxD ) Oollar s pe r yea r (F=Ex29.40) ° 22. 2 710.4 20,885.7 6

20,524. 6 603,422.6 5 Assum e on e affecte dfacilit y pe r respondent . Expec t 160. 5 affecte dfacilitie s i nfirs t 5 year s afte r proposa l o f the NSP S o r 32. 1 affecte dfacilitie s pe r year . Assume 32. 1 affecte dfacilitie s wil l incu r cos t o f al l one-time-onl y

burde nitems excep t thos e items associate dwit hopacit y monitoring . Onl y

17. 3 o f the affecte dfacilitie s wil l b e require dt o demonstrat e a continuou s monitorin g syste n(CMS ) t o monito r opacit y durin g a performanc e tes t and onl y 14. 8 o f th e affecte dfacilitie s wil l b e require dt o us e Referenc e Metho d9 t o monito r opacit y

durin g a performanc e tes t becaus e CM S wer e determine dno t t o b e cos t effective . An averag e o f 48. 1 facilitie s wil l incu r cost s o f recurren t reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s and 22. 2 facilitie s wil l incu r cost s o f certifyin g visibl e emission s observer s t o rea dth e opacit y o f visibl e .emission s i naccordanc e wit hReferenc e Metho d9 ove r 3 year s afte r proposa l o f th e NSPS . Cost s ar e base do nth e rat e o f pa y o f a governmen t employe e a t Grad e 10 , Ste p7 , whic hi s currentl y $14.0 0 pe r hour , and o nanoverhea drat e o f 11 0 percent . Thus , th e cos t i s $29.4 0 pe r hour . .Not applicable . Assum e 2 0 percen t o f initia l perfonnanc e test s mus t b e repeate dbecaus e th e initia l tes t failed . Existin g facilitie s ar e expecte dt o become affecte dfacilitie s becaus e the y ar e replace db

y ne w facilitie s .rathe r tha nbecaus e o f physica l o r operationa l change s (modifications) . Assum e responden t wil l submi t on e repor t o f exces s emission s pe r year . "Assum e responden t wil l shutdow ntwic e pe r yea r fo r maintenanc e o f proces s uni t and twic e pe r yea r fo r proces s .malfunctions . Assum e responden t operate s a facilit y (8,00 0 h/yr)( l d/2 4 h)( l wk/ 7 d ) = 4 8 wk/yr .



## 1 3P.1 9



## TABL E 5 . ANNUA

L BURDEN OF REPORTIN

GAN DRECORDKEEPIN

GREQUIREMENT S O F FACILITIE S CONTROLLE DB YWE T SCRUBBER S THA T AR E SUBJEC T T O TH E NSP S AFTE R(DAT E OF PROPOSAL )
Hour s Occur pe r rence s pe r Hour s pe r ocur - responden t responden t Respondent s Hour s Dollar s renc e pe r yea r pe r yea r pe r yea r pe r yea r pe r yea r h (A ) (8 ) (C=AxB ) (0 ) (E=CxD ) (F=Ex29.40) D Burde nite

m 1 . Application s 2 . Survey s an

dStudie s 3 . Reportin g Requirement s A . ReadInstruction s B . Require dActivitie s Initia l performanc e tes t Repea t o f performanc e tes t Referenc e Metho d9 tes t Repea t o f Referenc e Metho d9 tes t Demonstratio no f we t scrubbe r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s (OPMO ) Repea t o f demonstratio no f we t scrubbe r OPM O Recalibratio no f we t scrubbe r OPMO (semiannual ) C . Create Informatio n 0 . Gathe r ExistinqInformatio n E . Writ e Repor t Notificatio no f construction / reconstructio n Notificatio no f physical/operationa l change s Notificatio no f anticipate dstartup Notificatio no f actua l startup Notificatio no f initia l performanc e tes t Notificatio no f demonstratio no f CM S Report s o f exces s emission s (recurrent ) Repor t o f performanc e tes t Repor t o f wa t scrubbe r OPMD demonstratio n 4 . Recordkeepin g Requirement s A . Rea d Instruction s B . Pla n Activitie s C . Implemen t Activitie s 0 . Develo p Recor d Syste m E . Tim e t o Ente r Informatio n Record s o f startup , shutdown , malfunction , etc . (recurrent ) Record s o f al l measurement s an d informatio n require d b yth e standard s (recurrent ) Record s o f exces s emission s (recurrent ) N/A ' N/A 1 " N/ A
7. 5 7. 5

7. 5 15. 0 220.5 0
33 0 33 0 N/ A N/ A 2 2 4 Include d i n3 B Include d i n3 E 0.2 «

l e
0.2 d 2 33 0

6 6
2 0. 4 8 7. 5

7. 5
7. 5 7. 5 11. 3 2,475. 0

495. 0
15. 0 3. 0 90. 4 . 72,765.0 0

14,553.0 0
441.0 0
88.2 0 2,657.7 6

441.0 0

2 2 2 N/ A 1 6 Include d i n3 8 Include d In3 8
Include d in3 A Include d i n 3 8 Include d i n 3 8 N/ A
1-5 . 1. 5
Include d i n 3 E 1

1 1 1 «

4 h 48 1 2

2 2 1 6

6 7 2 7. 5

7. 5 7. 5
11. 3

11. 3 11. 3 15. 0

15. 0 15. 0
180. 8

67. 8 813. 6 441.0 0

441.0 0 441.0 0 5,315.5 2

1,993.3 2 23,919.8 4

(continued )



## 1 4P.2 0



## TABL E 5
. (continued )

Burde nite

m Hour s Occur pe r rence s pe r Hour s pe r ocur - responden t responden t renc e pe r yea r pe r yea r (A ) (B ) (C=AxB ) Respondent s Hour s Dollar s pe r year pe r yea r pe r yea r . (0 ) (E=CxD ) (F=Ex29.40) ° F . Tim e t o Trai nPersonne l G . Audit s TOTAL iNNUA

L HOUR S TOTAL ANNUAL COST S N/ A N/ A 4,208. 1 123,718.1 4 Assume on e affecte dfacilit y pe r respondent . Expec t 37. 5 affecte dfacilitie s infirs t 5 year s afte r proposa l o f th e NSP S o r 7. 5 affecte dfacilitie s pe r year . Assume 7. 5 affecte dfacilitie s wil l incur cost s o f al l one-time burde nitems . A naverag e o f 11. 3 facilitie s wil l incur cost s associate dwit hsemiannua l Reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s ove r 3 year s afte r proposa l o f th e NSPS . Cost s ar e base do

nthe rat e o f pay

o f a governmen t employe e a t Grad e 10 , Ste p7 , whic hi s currentl y $14.0 0 pe r hour , an

d o na noverhea drat e o f 11 0 percent . Thus , th e cos t I s $29.4 0 pe r hour . d No t applicable . Assum e 2 0 percen t o f Initia l performanc e test s mus t be repeate dbecaus e th e initia l tes t failed . -Assum e i t wil l tak e 1 hou r t o demonstrat e pressur e los s an d liqui dflo

w rat e monitorin g devices . Existin g facilitie s ar e expecte dt o become affecte dfacilitie s becaus e they ar e replace db

y new facilitie s rathe r thanbecaus e o f physica l o r operationa l change s (modifications) . ?Assume responden t wil l submi t on e repor t o f exces s emission s pe r year . Assum e responden t wil l shutdow ntwic e pe r yea r fo r maintenanc e o f proces s uni t an d twic e pe r yea r fo r proces s .malfunctions . Assum e responden t operate s a facilit y (8,00 0 h/yr)( l d/2 4 h)( l wk/ 7 d ) = 4 8 wk/yr .



# 1 5P.2 1



### 13 . Estimatio no f Responden t Burden . Informatio ncollectio n requirement s includ e th e followin g one-time-onl y reports :

• " - - Notificatio no f construction , modification , o r reconstruc tio nno late r tha n3 0 day s afte r commencemen t o f suc h action ;

- - Notificatio no f anticipate ddat e o f initia l startu pno mor e tha n6 0 day s no r les s tha n3 0 day s prio r t o suc h date ;

- - Notificatio no f th e dat e o f initia l startu pwithi n 1 5 day s afte r suc hdate ;

- - Notificatio no f th e dat e o f a ninitia l emissio ntes t withi n3 0 day s o f th e effectiv e dat e o f th e NSPS ; an d

- - Notificatio no f th e resul t o f th e initia l performanc e test . I t wa s assume dtha t 2 0 percen t o f th e initia l performanc e test s wil l fai l t o sho w complianc e wit hth e standards . Therefore , 2 0 percen t o f th e test s wil l b e repeated , an dth e report s wil l b e submitte dagain . Informatio ncollectio nrequirement s als o includ e th e followin g semiannua l an drecurren t reports :

- - Report s o f exceedance s o f th e opacit y limi t fo r dr y contro l device s o r exceedance s o f th e operatin g paramete r limit s fo r we t scrubbers .

- - Report s o f correctiv e maintenanc e require da s a resul t o f semiannua l calibratio no f CM S fo r dr y contro l device s o r o f operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s fo r we t scrubbers . I t wa s assume dtha t eac hresponden t woul drepor t on e exceedanc e pe r yea r regardles s o f th e typ e o f contro l devic e used . One-time-onl y

informatio nrequirement s wil l affec t 16 0 facilitie s controlle db

y dry contro l device s inth e firs t 5 year s afte r proposa l
o r abou t 3 2 facilitie s pe r yea r an dwil l affec t 3 8 facilitie s con trolle db

y we t scrubber s i

nth e firs t 5 year s afte r proposa l o r abou t 8 facilitie s pe r year . Semiannua l report s o f exceedance s o f th e opacit y limi t fo r dry

contro l device s wil l affec t 4 8 facilitie s i n th e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . Semiannua l report s o f exceedance s 1 6P.2 2



### o f operatin g paramete r limit s fo r we t scrubber s wil l affec t 1 1 facilitie s i nth e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . Semiannua l report s o f correctiv e maintenanc e require da s i resul t o f semiannua l calibration s o f CM S fo r dr y contro l device s o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s fo r
we t scrubber s wil l affec t 2 6 and1 1 facilities , respectively , i nth e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . Cost s o f certifyin g visibl e emission s observer s t o rea dth e opacit y o f visibl e emission s fro m dr y contro l device s wil l affec t 2 2 facilities . 14 . Reaso nfo r Chang e i nBurden . Thi s sectio ni s no t applicable . 15 . Scheduling . Informatio ncontaine di nth e one-time-onl y report s wil l b e entere dint o th e Complianc e Dat a Syste m operate dand maintaine db

y EPA' s Divisio no f Stationar y Source Enforcement . Dat a obtaine ddurin g periodi c visit s b y Agenc y personne l fro

m record s maintaine db

y th e respondent s wil l b e tabulate dandpublishe dfo r interna l Agenc y

us e i ncomplianc e andenforcemen t programs . A time schedul e fo r th e collectio no f informatio nandpublicatio no f dat a i s
no t applicabl e becaus e report s andrecordkeepin g ar e triggere db y action s o f th e respondents . 16 . Standar dIndustria l Classification s (SIC) . Th e SI C code s fo r th e respondent s affecte db y thes e recommende dstandard s ar e 1051 , 1446 , 1452 , 1453 , 1454 , 1455 , 1459 , 1492 , 1496 , 1499 , 2816 , and3295 . B . COLLECTIO N

O F INFORMATION

EMPLOYINGSTATISTICA L METHOD S Thi s sectio ni s no t applicabl e becaus e statistica l method s ar e
no t use dinth e dat a collectio nassociate dwit hthi s regulation .



## 17P.2 3



## Informatio nRequirement s an dAuthorit y

Dat a Shee t 4 0 CFRSubpar t UU

U NSP S fo r Calciner s an dDryar s inMinera l Industrie s
Requiremen t Reportin g Notificatio no f constructio no r reconstructio n Notificatio no f modificatio n Notificatio no f anticipate d startu pan

dactua l startup Notificatio no f Initia l performanc e tes t Notificatio no f demonstratio n o f continuou s monitorin g system s Repor t o f performanc e tes t result s Repor t o f demonstratio no f continuou s monitorin g system s Repor t o f visibl e emission s observation s take ndurin g performanc e tes t Semiannua l report s o f exces s emission s recorde d unde r 60.73 4 Recordkeepin g Record s o f startup , shutdown , o r malfunctio n Retentio n o f al l measurement s an d informatio n recorde d unde r 60.73 4 fo r 2 year s Monitorin g Monitorin g o f emission s fro m dr ycontro l device s Monitorin g o f operatin g parameter s o f a we t scrubbe r Regulatio n referenc e

60.735(b )

60.735(a )

60.734(a ) and (b ) 60.734(c ) Genera l

Provision s referenc e
60.7(a)(1 ) 60.7(a)(4 ) 60.7(a)(2 ) an d(3 ) 60.8(d ) 60.7(a)(5 ) 60.8(a ) 60.13(c ) 60.11(e )

60.7(b ) 60.7(d )