alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED September 30,
2000.


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1525
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1525
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              363
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3316
<OTHER-SE>                                       (2154)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1525
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (363)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.000)



</TABLE>
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WESTERN DIVISION

Mohamad Jabrini, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 1:17cv621 

Attorney General, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Respondents. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the 

Magistrate Judge on December 8, 2017 (Doc. 9). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), 

including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections 

to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 

F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and 

Recommendation have been filed. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) of the 

Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is 

GRANTED consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett 

United States District Judge
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

AARON WIDAY, et al.,

Plaintiffs, : Case No. 3:17-cv-323

District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

- vs - Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

JOSEPH MARKOV, et al.,

Defendants. :

RECUSAL ORDER 

This case was randomly assigned to the undersigned upon its filing in September 2017. 

District Judge Rice has now entered a Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order which refers the 

case to me for pretrial management purposes (ECF No. 10). However, many of the dates set in 

the Order occur after expiration of my term of office on March 1, 2018.

Therefore, I recuse myself from further judicial participation in this case and direct the 

Clerk to randomly reassign the case to one of the other Magistrate Judges resident at Dayton.

December 19, 2017.

 s/ Michael R. Merz

 United States Magistrate Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 2:17-cr-238

JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

JENNIFER McDONALD, 

Defendant.

ORDER

On November 1, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Count I

of the Information charging her with misprision of a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4. 

Defendant, represented by counsel, waived her right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure. Defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact. 

Defendant was specifically informed of her right to contest the Report and Recommendation

by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did

not file any objections. 
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS

Defendant’s plea of guilty to Count I of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of

misprision of a felony.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ George C. Smith 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1135
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 2 of 15 PAGEID #: 1136
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 3 of 15 PAGEID #: 1137
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 4 of 15 PAGEID #: 1138
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 5 of 15 PAGEID #: 1139
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 6 of 15 PAGEID #: 1140
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 7 of 15 PAGEID #: 1141
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 8 of 15 PAGEID #: 1142
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 9 of 15 PAGEID #: 1143
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 10 of 15 PAGEID #: 1144
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 11 of 15 PAGEID #: 1145
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 12 of 15 PAGEID #: 1146
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 13 of 15 PAGEID #: 1147
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 14 of 15 PAGEID #: 1148
Case: 1:17-cv-00774-SJD Doc #: 58 Filed: 10/09/19 Page: 15 of 15 PAGEID #: 1149
##### 



FIRST SHARES BANCORP, INC.

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her
capacity as an officer of First Shares Bancorp, Inc. (First Shares), that, to
his or her knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report of First Shares on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
First Shares Bancorp, Inc.                               

|       |  |                 |  |                                                                                                                                      
|------ |  | --------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: |  | August 14, 2003 |  |                                                                                                                                      
|      
|       |  |                 |  | /s/ Kimberly B. Kling
Kimberly B. Kling
Secretary, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Certification

STATE OF INDIANA:

I, Bradley W. Skolnik, Executive Director of the Office of

Admissions and Continuing Legal Education, do hereby certify that

MAX ANDREW SCHREIBER

is a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of Indiana since admission

June 1, 2022 , and is in good standing therein.

Given under my hand and the seal of said Court at

Indianapolis, Indiana, this 7th day of September, 2023.

Bradley W. Skolnik

Executive Director

Office of Admissions and Continuing Education

Indiana Supreme Court

on

SUPREME COURT OF 

THE STATE OF INDIANA 

Case: 1:17-cv-00754-DRC Doc #: 150-1 Filed: 09/07/23 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 4378
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4275 

AN ACT 

To designate the annex building under construction for the 

Elbert P. Tuttle United States Court of Appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia, as the ‘‘John C. Godbold Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4275 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The annex building under construction for the United 

3 States courthouse located at 56 Forsyth Street in Atlanta, 

4 Georgia, known as the Elbert P. Tuttle United States 

5 Court of Appeals Building, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘John C. Godbold Federal Building’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the annex 

10 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

11 a reference to the ‘‘John C. Godbold Federal Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 14, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4275 

AN ACT 

To designate the annex building under construction 

‘‘John C. Godbold Federal Building’’. Appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia, as the for the Elbert P. Tuttle United States Court of
Court Name: US District Court SDO

Division: I

feceipt Nuiber; 100C1H037798

Cashier ID: hiltze

Transaction Date: 10/07/2019

Payer Name: BAKER OONELSON BEARMAN

PRO HAC VICE

For: BAKER OONELSON BEARMAN

Case/Party: D-OHS-1-19-LD-ATlYOl-001

Amount: $200.00

CHECK

Remitter: BAKER OONELSON BEARMAN CALDWEL

Check/Money Order Num: 0112918

Amt Tendered: $200.00

Total Due: $200.00

Total Tendered: s2(10.00

Change Amt: $0.00

1:17CV783 PHV - KEVIN STINE

A fee of $53.00 uiII be assessed on all returned checks.

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 43 Filed: 10/07/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 247
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION 

CARMEN STEPHENSON & AKILAH 

WRIGHT, ET AL.

 Plaintiffs,

v.

FOOD CONCEPTS 

INTERNATIONAL, LP, et al.,

 Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:16-cv-01029

Judge Algenon Marbley

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

______________________________________________________________________________

TIFFANY CONN,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FOOD CONCEPTS 

INTERNATIONAL, LP, et al.,

 Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:17-CV-00824

Judge Algenon Marbley

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case: 2:17-cv-00825-ALM-EPD Doc #: 51 Filed: 06/04/18 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 608
:

______________________________________________________________________________

JADE LICHTENBERGER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FOOD CONCEPTS 

INTERNATIONAL, LP, et al.,

 Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:17-CV-00825

Judge Algenon Marbley

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

______________________________________________________________________________

BRITTANY STONE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FOOD CONCEPTS 

INTERNATIONAL, LP, et al.,

 Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:17-CV-00824

Judge Algenon Marbley

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case: 2:17-cv-00825-ALM-EPD Doc #: 51 Filed: 06/04/18 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 609
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs Carmen Stephenson, Akilah 

Wright, Tiffany Conn, Jade Lichtenberger and Brittany Stone, by their undersigned counsel, 

hereby dismiss their cases with prejudice. The Court reserves jurisdiction to the extent necessary 

to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement.

Respectfully submitted ,

/s/ Wesley T. Fortune___________

Wesley T. Fortune (Sup. Ct. # 0085397)

4417 Carroll Southern Road

Carroll, Ohio 43112

Telephone: (614) 218-9745

Facsimile: (614) 569-0100

E-Mail: wfortune@wtflegal.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 4

th day of June, 2018, I e-mailed the above document to Defendants’ 

counsel identified herein: 

Faith C. Whittaker and Susan H. Jackson, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, 225 East Fifth Street, Suite 

1900, Cincinnati, OH 45202,

Janay Stevens, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, 191 W. Nationwide Blvd., Suite 300, Columbus, OH 

43215

Faith.whittaker@dinsmore.com; janay.stevens@dinsmore.com; susan.jackson@dinsmore.com, 

Attorneys for Defendants.

/s/ Wesley T. Fortune 

Wesley T. Fortune 

Case: 2:17-cv-00825-ALM-EPD Doc #: 51 Filed: 06/04/18 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 610
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4212 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4212

                  For the relief of Rigoberto Padilla.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 3, 2009

Ms. Schakowsky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Rigoberto Padilla.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR RIGOBERTO PADILLA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Rigoberto Padilla shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Rigoberto Padilla enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Rigoberto Padilla, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Rigoberto 
Padilla shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0041. RONNIE WILLIAMS v. HOMER BRYSON et al.

Prisoner Ronnie Williamssought to proceed in forma pauperis in a petition for

writ of mandamus against, inter alia, the Georgia Department of Corrections. On

April 5, 2018, the trial court denied his request to proceed in forma pauperis and

rejected the filing of the petition. On June 25, 2018, Williams filed in the Supreme

Court of Georgia an application for discretionary review,

1

alleging that he did not

receive timely notice of the trial court’s order. The Supreme Court transferred the

case to this Court. See Case No. S18D1500 (July 13, 2018). We, however, also lack

jurisdiction.

An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). In his application,

Williams assertsthat he did not receive the order of the trial court until June 18, 2018.

But the requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot

accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. Boyle v. State,

190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Williams’s application was untimely

1 Because he is incarcerated, Williams’s appeal is controlled by the Prison

Litigation Reform Act of 1996, OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq. Under OCGA § 42-12-8,

“[a]ppeals of all actions filed by prisoners shall be as provided in Code Section 5-6-

35[,]” the statute governing discretionary appeals.

August 29, 2018
filed 81 days after entry of the order he seeksto appeal. Accordingly, this application

is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Finally, to the extent that the trial court did not provide Williams with timely

notice of its April 5, 2018 order, his remedy is to petition the trial court to set aside

and re-enter the order as a means of correcting the problem. See Pierce v. State, 289

Ga. 893, 894-895 (2) (717 SE2d 202) (2011).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/29/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      24,177,502
<SECURITIES>                                 7,603,308
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,425,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    902,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,520,070
<PP&E>                                      11,606,793
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,390,796
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,183,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,777,326
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,455
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,404,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,183,615
<SALES>                                     13,143,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,815,355
<CGS>                                        7,614,068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,588,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             429,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,749,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,749,164
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,749,164
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60


</TABLE>
The best E-story neve

Air quality improvemen

Texas
-30%

-20%-10%

0%

10%20%30%

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 200

Percent Change

Comparison of the Percent Change in Eight-Hour Ozone a

in the DFW Area

1997-2007

Eight-Hour Ozone Design Value PopulationVehicle Miles Traveled Population Corr

*Source: Population - Estimated based on data fromUS Census Bureau and Texas State Data Center, August 2008

VMT - Texas Transportation Institute, August 2008Ozone - EPA Air Quality System Data, Februrary 10, 2009
Air Quality Highlights i

• 7 NA or NNA areas for 9 NAA• Many HGB 1-hr Ozone peaks 

ppb beginning in Jan.-Feb.

• Serious inter, intra-state and i

transport of pollutants

• Strategy concentrated on reduc

emissions

• No clear path to achieve attain• Conducted >$20M air quality 

2000 (follow up study in 2005
Achievements

• All areas, except HGB and DFW a

attainment ( 85 ppb Ozone standar

• El Paso is monitoring attainment 

and Ozone NAAQS

• DFW attained the 1-hr Ozone std • Few 1-hr Ozone exceedances in H

highest in the 150-160 ppb range . exceedances in Winter and Spring
HGB 
DFW
Key factors 

contributing to succe

• 2000 and 2005 air quality studies• Permitting of grandfathered source

major emission reductions)

• TERP and LIRAP incentive progr

accelerated introduction of cleaner and equipment

• Targeted reductions of Highly Rea• TX-developed and EPA-approved 

Action Compacts as incentive for 
Key factors 

contributing to succe

• Reduction (about 80%) in volume 

from episodic emissions

• Implementation of real-time Envir

Monitoring Rapid Response Syste

• Introduction and extensive use of 

camera to make VOC emissions vimplementation of “Find it and Fi

• Cooperation