alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Globix Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter K. Stevenson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: December 17, 2004                 /s/ Peter K. Stevenson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Peter K. Stevenson
                                        Chief Executive Officer
TradeOn Inc.: Exhibit 10.20 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com











Exhibit 10.20 


Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount 


Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the "Contract") Entered into by and between Changzhou Wujin Best Cable Co., Ltd. (the "Guarantor") and Changzhou Wunjin Branch, Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (the "Creditor") on January 4, 2010


Main contents:

	
Guaranty Contract number: Year 2010 Luo Zui Bao Zi Di 0104 Hao;

	
Guarantor undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for Changzhou Shunfeng Packing Vessel Co., Ltd. (the "Obligor")’s indebtedness towards Industrial Bank under the agreements or other documents between the Obligor and Creditor from
January 4, 2010, to January 3, 2011, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 8 million.

	

Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt.

	

Scope of Guaranty: The guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract compensation, damages, loss of foreign exchange rate floating, and fees incurred to the Creditor to realizing its rights
(including but not limited to litigation fee and legal fee), which, however, is not subject to the cap of RMB 8 million

	

Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of relevant agreements or documents entered into between the Obligor and Creditor.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

SCOTT E. HALL,
Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-345
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF District Judge Walter H. Rice
SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #12), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such
objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and
Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full;

2. The Commissioner’s non-disability determination is REVERSED;

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and

4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

Date: “T=3O-1B ba Ton
WALTER HERBERT RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
the undersigned officer of the Injet
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify to my
knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2006 of the Company fully complies, in all material
respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Report fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer

Date: May 11, 2006
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4215 

To prohibit the inclusion of brucella abortus in certain lists of dangerous 

biological agents and toxins. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2009 

Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the inclusion of brucella abortus in certain lists 

of dangerous biological agents and toxins. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Brucella Abortus Re5 moval Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF BRUCELLA ABORTUS FROM LISTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date of the en8 actment of this Act, the lists of biological agents and tox9 ins established and maintained under section 351A(a)(1) 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4215 IH

1 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)) 

2 and section 212(a)(1) of the Agricultural Bioterrorism 

3 Protection Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8401 note) shall not in4 clude brucella abortus. 

5 (b) CONFORMING CHANGES.—The Secretary of 

6 Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Agri7 culture shall revise the regulations, guidance, and other 

8 materials of the Department of Health and Human Serv9 ices and the Department of Agriculture, respectively, to 

10 the extent necessary for consistency with subsection (a). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wendy F. DiCicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                              |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 13, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WENDY F. DICICCO,
CPA
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                              |  | Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA  
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                              |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-156427 on Form S-8 of our reports dated September 14, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Kensey Nash Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”), and theeffectiveness of Company’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kensey Nash Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2009. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

September 14, 2009
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Open Text Corporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement number 333-121377 on Form S-8 of Open Text Corporation of our reportsdated September 23, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Open Text Corporation as of June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended June 30, 2005, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofJune 30, 2005, which reports appear in the June 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Open Text Corporation. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Toronto, Canada 

September 27, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-226

Shalonda Banks 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 10) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and she

is hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: November 17, 2017 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.0

                           Section 1350 CERTIFICATION

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Each of, Ronald B. Geib, Chief Executive Officer and Brendan J. McGill, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Harleysville Savings Financial
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

(1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                                           By: /s/ Ronald B. Geib
                                                -----------------
                                               Ronald B. Geib
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                           By:  /s/ Brendan J. McGill
                                                ---------------------
                                                Brendan J. McGill
                                                Senior Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 13, 2008

Note:  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
       the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Harleysville Savings
       Financial Corporation and will be retained by Harleysville Savings
       Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
       Commission or its staff upon request.
#### J. Sky TAPP v. Bonita FOWLER

85-223

702 S.W.2d 17

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered January 21, 1986

*71
      *Tapp Law Office,*by: *J. Sky Tapp,*for appellant.

*Hobbs, Longinotti, Bosson & Naramore,*by: *Ronald G. Naramore,*for appellee.

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This appeal is dismissed because there was no final judgment or order entered.

Bonita Fowler sued Sky Tapp, who at one time represented her, claiming that Tapp wrongfully withheld money from a property settlement in her divorce case. She asked for the $1,000 in dispute and punitive damages. Tapp filed a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment. The trial judge denied the motions on March 26,1985. Tapp did not file an answer or other pleading. In June Fowler asked for a default judgment, and it was granted for the $ 1,000. The claim for punitive damages was to be determined at a later proceeding.

Rule 2 of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that an appeal may be taken from a final judgment or decree. To be final, a judgment must dismiss the parties from court, discharge them from the action, or conclude their rights to the subject matter in controversy. *Hyatt*v. *City of Bentonville,*275 Ark. 210, 628 S.W.2d 326 (1982); *McConnell*v. *Sadle,*248 Ark. 1182, 455 S.W.2d 880 (1970); *Piercy*v. *Baldwin,*205 Ark. 413, 168 S.W.2d 1110 (1943).

In *Fratesi*v. *Bond,*282 Ark. 213, 666 S.W.2d 712 (1984), a recent case in which the trial court dismissed a claim for punitive damages but deferred the claim for compensatory damages, we said:

> If this appeal were allowed and we decided the issue on punitive damages and subsequent errors occurred during *72the trial on the remaining issues, the case could be appealed a second time, resulting in two appeals where one would suffice. This case illustrates simply the reason for the rule that an order must be final to be appealable.

That is exactly the situation presented here.

Appeal dismissed.

Purtle, J., not participating.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                          KEY AUTO FINANCE TRUST 1997-1
                        OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICER

To:    Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware, as Owner Trustee
       Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee
       Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
       Standard & Poor's Ratings Group
       Fitch Investors Service, L.P.

         Pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as
of February 21, 1997 among Key Auto Finance Trust 1997-1, as Issuer, Key
Consumer Acceptance Corporation, as Seller, Key Bank USA, National Association,
as Servicer and Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee (the "Agreement"),
the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of Servicer
from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's supervision and (ii) to
the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement
throughout such period.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate this 22nd day of
March, 2000.

                                  KEY BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
                                  as Servicer

                                  By: /S/ Craig T. Platt
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Craig T. Platt
                                     Senior Vice President



                                    Page 18
##### 



FIRST SHARES BANCORP, INC.

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or
her capacity as an officer of First Shares Bancorp, Inc. (First Shares),
that, to his or her knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report of First Shares on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First
Shares Bancorp, Inc.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  November 14, 2003/s/ Jerry R. EngleJerry R. Engle
President and Chief
Executive Officer


21
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffry
J. Parell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
             or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.



                                   /s/ Jeffry J. Parell
                                   ---------------------------------
                                   Jeffry J. Parell
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   July 28, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-264

Christopher Tobie 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 26) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the information, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: January 22, 2018 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 412 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 412

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 
  property taxes in determining the amount of the alternative minimum 
       taxable income of any taxpayer (other than a corporation).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2009

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 
  property taxes in determining the amount of the alternative minimum 
       taxable income of any taxpayer (other than a corporation).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeowners Property Tax Relief Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR PROPERTY TAXES ALLOWED IN DETERMINING INDIVIDUAL 
              ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAXABLE INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Clause (ii) of section 56(b)(1)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general limitation on deductions 
applicable to individuals) is amended by striking ``(1), (2), or''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 09-3006

_____________

JEWISH HOME OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES;

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondents

____________

On Petition for Review from on Order by the Secretary

of the Department of Health and Human Services 

(No. 09-42)

Submitted January 27, 2011

Before: FUENTES, CHAGARES, and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

____________

ORDER

____________

On the Court’s own motion, this Court’s mandate issued on June 16, 2011 is 

hereby RECALLED. The parties’ motions to publish, filed on August 31, 2011 and 

February 8, 2012, are hereby GRANTED, and this Court’s not precedential opinion, filed 

February 11, 2011, is hereby VACATED. An amended precedential opinion shall be 

filed forthwith. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate upon the filing of the amended 

precedential opinion. 
/s/ Michael A. Chagares

Circuit Judge

DATED: August 14, 2012

trg/cc: Christopher S. Lucas, Esq.

 Alan C. Horowitz, Esq.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Derrick Sweeting, :

:

Plaintiff(s), :

: Case Number: 1:17cv727

vs. :

: Judge Susan J. Dlott

Thomas Schweigtzer, et al., :

:

Defendant(s). :

ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United

States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate

Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the

pleadings and filed with this Court on July 12, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 51). 

Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc 56).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered

de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does

determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 35) is GRANTED. 

Plaintiff’s pending motions (Docs 53 and 54) are DENIED as moot. This case is hereby

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________

Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1







                    STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned certifies that this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


                                     /s/ Mark J. Levin
                                     ------------------------------------
Dated: March 7, 2003                 Mark J. Levin
                                     Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer
                                     (Principal executive officer)