alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
September 20, 2010 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2010-3 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and
the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in
connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that
I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated: March 30, 2015
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
#### City of Saginaw v Gatson,

No. 90747;

Court of Appeals No. 130591.
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4212 

For the relief of Rigoberto Padilla. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2009 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Rigoberto Padilla. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR 

4 RIGOBERTO PADILLA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Rigoberto Padilla shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4212 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Rigoberto Padilla 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Rigoberto Padilla, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4212 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Rigoberto Padilla shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 7




to 



Yahoo! Publisher Network Agreement #205132


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 7 (this “Seventh Amendment”) is entered into as of June 8, 2010 (the
“Seventh Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Yahoo! Inc (“Yahoo!”), as
successor-in-interest to Overture Services, Inc. (“Overture”) and Local.com Corporation,
formerly known as Interchange Corporation, (“Publisher”), and amends the Yahoo! Publisher
Network Agreement #205132 between Overture and Publisher entered into as of October 17,
2005, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of December 8, 2005, Amendment No. 2 dated as of March
31, 2006, Amendment No. 3 dated as of August 1, 2007, Amendment No. 4 dated as of April 16, 2009,
Amendment No. 5 dated as of June 12, 2009, and Amendment No. 6 dated as of November 12, 2009
(collectively, the “Agreement”).



In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions, the receipt and sufficiency is of which
are hereby acknowledged, Publisher and Yahoo! hereby agree as follows:




     1. The Agreement is amended to delete the “End Date” on the first page of the Agreement in its
entirety and to replace it with the following:




	 	 	 	“End Date: June 30, 2010. Thereafter, the Agreement will automatically renew for
additional one (1) month periods (each a ‘Renewal Term’) unless either party
gives notice of non-renewal at least fifteen (15) days before the expiration of the Term.
As used in the Agreement, ‘Term’ means the period between the Start Date and the
End Date and each Renewal Term, if any.”





     2. This Seventh Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which when
executed shall be deemed to be the original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one
and the same instrument.



     3. The Agreement is amended to provide that references in the Agreement to “this Agreement” or
“the Agreement” (including indirect references such as “hereunder”, “hereby”, “herein” and
“hereof”) shall be deemed references to the Agreement as amended hereby. Capitalized terms not
defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement, except as amended by this Seventh
Amendment.



     4. Except as amended by this Seventh Amendment, the Agreement will remain in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Seventh
Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Seventh Amendment shall govern.


This Seventh Amendment has been executed by the duly authorized representatives of the parties as
of the Seventh Amendment Effective Date.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	LOCAL.COM CORPORATION	 	 	 	YAHOO! INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Stanley B. Crair
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ David Sullivan	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	Name:

	 	Stanley B. Crair
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	David Sullivan	 	 
	Title:

	 	President and COO
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	VP Business Development
Document has been coded “B” May be requested under the Freedom of 

Information Act Http:// www.epa/pesticide/foia or contact the Office 

of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Docket at (703) 305-5805.

Access is restricted to entities not engaged in the production sale or 

distribution of pesticides outside the United States
#### Mitchell *v.*Parker.

4-6075

143 S. W. 2d 1114

Opinion delivered October 28, 1940.

*E. A. Williams,*for appellant.

*J. E. Reynolds,*for appellee.

*178GtrifeiN Smith, C. J.

The appeal is from a decree

that Dennis Parker should not be ejected from forty acres of land he bought in 1919 for $1,000. He failed to pay state taxes assessed for 1934, and September 16, 1938, the commissioner sold to appellant for $40. Assessment of betterments in Conway County Bridge District for 1928, 1929, and 1930 likewise went unpaid. There was foreclosure and purchase by the district, with court approval in 1935. Appellant became the district’s grantee December 5, 1938. The deed was signed: “Conway County Bridge District, by E. E. Mitchell, President; L. T. Oates, Secretary.”

The trial court held that sale to the state was void because the county clerk failed to attach his warrant to the list of 1934 taxes transmitted by him to the collector. More than twenty other reasons were assigned in urging that the sale was void. Of the ground upon which the chancellor avoided the sale, appellant says: “According to the former decisions of this court we have very little quarrel on this account.” Appellee treats this language as an admission on the part of appellant that the sale was void. We agree that it was. *Stade*v. Berg, 182 Ark. 118, 30 S. W. 2d 211; *Hirsch and Schuman*v. *Dabbs and Mivelaz,*197 Ark. 756 at p. 764, 126 S. W. 2d 116.

It is contended, however, that sale to the bridge district was valid, and that the chancellor erred in setting it aside because, as stated in the decree, title was in the state at the time the bridge district purchased. (Act 329, approved March 15, 1939.) Under this statute sale to the district was not void. But sale by the district to appellant was in contravention of public policy. *Moon*v. *Georgia State Savings Association,*200 Ark. 1012, 142 S. W. 2d 234.

Appellant was president of the district’s board of commissioners. In the Moon Case we said:

“Although no statute has been brought to our attention expressly prohibiting the collector of a municipal improvement district from purchasing property from the district, we think sound public policy requires complete separation of private transactions from of*179ficial conduct. 'Because of Ms close contact with commissioners who are charged with the duty of disposing of property acquired through foreclosure proceedings, the collector enjoys privileges of relationship denied by circumstances to the general public.”

If the collector of a municipal improvement district is prohibited from purchasing the district’s property, there is even greater reason for excluding a member of 'the board of commissioners. In the case at bar the commissioner was president of the board, and as such he executed the deed to himself. While no moral turpitude is involved, and appellant followed a custom formerly unchallenged, .the Moon Case announced a rale of exclusion and it must be adhered to.

The decree is affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

KATHY CALVERT, et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-635

Plaintiffs, Judge Timothy S. Black

vs.

LINDFIELD EQUIPMENT, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised by the parties that this civil action has been settled;

It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided 

that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, move to reopen the 

action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to 

substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement.

The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement 

agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 1/5/18 /s/ Timothy S. Black 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
IMPATH Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No.'s 33-98916, 333-08553 and 333-45921) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-09469) of
IMPATH Inc. of our report dated February 6, 1998, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of IMPATH Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K
of IMPATH Inc.



                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 9, 1998
Case: 3:17-cr-00129-SLO Doc #: 15 Filed: 07/18/18 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 30
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM 39307

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Paul S. HEBERT

Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 28 March 2018

________________________

Military Judge: Joseph S. Imburgia.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 3 months, 

reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 22 May 2017 by 

GCM convened at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. 

For Appellant: Captain Dustin J. Weisman, USAF.

For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen 

Payne, Esquire.

Before HARDING, SPERANZA, and HUYGEN, Appellate Military 

Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 

59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). 
United States v. Hebert, No. ACM 39307

2

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

LISA L. BURTON-BROWN, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:17-cv-392

 

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(consent case)

Defendant.

ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD 

OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (“EAJA”)

(DOC. 21); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $4,400.00 IN EAJA FEES

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint 

stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal 

Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $4,400.00. Doc. 21. Based 

upon the parties’ stipulation in which they present no dispute that all requirements are met for the 

reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties’ joint stipulation (doc. 21); 

and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $4,400.00. As no further matters remain 

pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 7/3/2019 s/ Michael J. Newman 

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.46 August 25, 2003 Jan Hughes
2027 Mezes Avenue
Belmont, CA 94002 Dear Jan: Molecular Devices Corporation is pleased to confirm our verbal offer for the salaried, exempt
position of Director, IonWorks Product Development. In this position you will report to John
Senaldi. This offer is contingent upon the successful completion of professional references and
background check. Your base salary will be $10,833.33 per month ($130,000.00 per annum) payable semi-monthly on the
15th and last day of each month. You will also receive all the employment benefits available to
regular full-time employees of Molecular Devices Corporation. You will be eligible to receive 5,000 Incentive Stock Options subject to the approval of the
Molecular Devices Board of Directors. These options will vest in accordance with the Companys
vesting schedule over a period of four (4) years, and will be subject to the provisions of the
Companys 1995 Stock Option Plan as amended. Upon your start date, as a condition of employment, you will be required to sign an Employee
Confidentiality and Inventions Agreement (copy of agreement attached). Please review this
agreement carefully; if you have any questions regarding this agreement, please feel free to call
me. This offer is made contingent upon your ability to provide proof of identification and
authorization to work in the United States. Upon employment at Molecular Devices, you will be
required to furnish such documentation as described in the enclosed materials. Additionally, this written offer constitutes all conditions and agreements of Molecular Devices
Corporation. Upon acceptance of this offer, please sign, date, indicate your start date, and
return this letter and the enclosed Application Form to the Human Resources Department. However, if
you have not responded to this offer within five (5) days of receipt the offer will be withdrawn. Jan, Molecular Devices Corporation is facing many exciting challenges as we continue to grow. Your
experience and talents will be strong additions to our company. We are looking forward to having
you join our team. Sincerely, MOLECULAR DEVICES CORPORATION /s/ Patricia Sharp Patricia Sharp
VP Human Resources PS/ks Attachments Accepted:
    
    /s/ Jan Hughes
 Date: 8/27/03
Start Date: 9/15/03
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 2170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition C Study Section DDK-C COMMITTEE.
    Date: March 16-18, 2022.
    Time: 5:00 p.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Maria E. Davila-Bloom, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7017, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7637, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#690d081f000508440b0506060404290c111d1b084707000d0d0247070001470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe9a9f8897929fd39c9291919393be9b868a8c9fd090979a9a95d0909796d0999188">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 7, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00481 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Concourse Village, Inc., Appellant, v Floree Bilotti, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 27, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Henry J. Steinglass*for appellant. *Lansner Wendt Himmelstein & McConnell (Robert J. Anderson*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Final judgment dated November 24, 1986 reversed, with $30 costs, and final judgment of possession granted in favor of the petitioner.

*887The petitioner is a limited-profit housing company organized under article II of the Private Housing Finance Law and seeks possession of the subject premises after the death of the tenant-cooperator. Respondent, who lived with the deceased tenant for a number of years at the premises, was not a signatory to the occupancy agreement nor was she ever listed on affidavits of income filed by the decedent. However, she claims possessory rights as the assignee of the shares allocable to the apartment and as a member of the deceased tenant’s immediate family in occupancy. Civil Court, while acknowledging the conceded fact that respondent was not the spouse of the tenant of record, held that for purposes of determining the right to occupy the premises and to hold the shares allocable thereto, respondent should be "deemed to be” a member of the tenant’s immediate family.

We reverse. Examination of the governing bylaws, occupancy agreement, and stock certificate makes clear that there are no rights of survivorship in this State-assisted Mitchell-Lama cooperative. The tenant-shareholder did not have the right to assign the apartment shares without first offering same for sale to the cooperative, and this rule is binding on his legal representatives (Bylaws, art VII, §§ 3A, 3H). Even assuming that eligible resident members of the cooperator’s immediate family would be entitled to acquire the shares upon his death, respondent does not qualify because she was not, in law, the spouse of the tenant and cannot claim the benefit of property rights incident to the legal relationship of marriage *(Young v Carruth,*89 AD2d 466; *Lepow v Gress,*NYLJ, July 2, 1984, at 14, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept]).

We have examined respondent’s remaining arguments and find them substantially without merit.

Sandifer, J. P., Parness and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of USA Video Interactive Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anton J. Drescher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. this report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or  15(d) of the 1934 Act, and  2. the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the registrant's financial condition and results of  operations of the registrant.  By: /s/ Anton J. Drescher ------------------------------------ Name: Anton J. Drescher Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer  Date:May 16, 2011