alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People on the relation of William M. Allen and another v. Marshall D. Frink.

.Assessor *of school-district: Warrant: Mandamus: Answer: Want of funds.*A showing of a want: of funds is a complete answer to an application for *mandamus*to require an assessor of a school-district to pay a warrant drawn on him in favor of a school teacher.

*Submitted on briefs and decided April 30.*

Application for *Mandamus.*

*Ghadwiclc & Potter,*for relator?.

*Atkinson Bros.,*for respondent.

Pee CueiaM:

Application is made by the moderator and the director of a school-district for a writ of *mandamus*to require the respondent, who is assessor of the district, to pay a certain warrant drawn upon him by them in favor of a school teacher.

The respondent shows for cause, among other things, a want of funds, and as this showing is not in any way impugned, nor any attempt made to question its correctness, the writ must be denied, with costs to respondent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-268-1

Christopher A. Braden 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 37) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 3 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: January 24, 2018 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge
Case: 3:17-mj-00391-MJN Doc #: 4 Filed: 08/25/17 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 18
Case: 3:17-mj-00391-MJN Doc #: 4 Filed: 08/25/17 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

LINDA L. WHITE,

Plaintiff,

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-CV-1063

JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

Magistrate Judge Vascura

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's October 25, 2018 Report

and Recommendation (ECF No. IS) that recommended that the Plaintiffs Statement of Errors

be overruled and that the Commissioner ofSocial Security's decision be affirmed.

TheReport and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that the failure to object

results in a waiverofthe right to have the districtjudge review the Report and Recommendation

de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court

adopting theReport andRecommendation. (ECF No. 15at 13). Theparties have failed to file any

objections, and the deadline for objections (November 8,2018) haslapsed.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on the independent

consideration of the analysis therein. Plaintiffs Statement of Errors is OVERRULED, and the

Commissioner's decision is AFFHIMED. This case is DISMISSED. The clerk is directed to

enterjudgment in favor ofDefendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Algenon L. Marblev

DATED: November 30,2018

ALGENON L. MARBLEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

TIJUANA LAVERN CANDERS, :

: Case No. 2:17-cv-867

 Plaintiff, :

: JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

 v. :

: Magistrate Judge Deavers

FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT :

OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al., : 

:

 Defendants. :

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s February 26, 2018 Report 

and Recommendation (ECF No. 6), which recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims 

against Defendants without prejudice. On January 9, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report 

and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed 

In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) be denied. The Report and Recommendation was returned as 

undeliverable. (ECF No. 4). The Magistrate Judge then issued an Order to Show Cause (ECF 

No. 5) directing Plaintiff to provide the Court with confirmation of her most recent address 

within 21 days. She failed to do so. Thus, the Magistrate Judge issued the instant Report and 

Recommendation recommending dismissal without prejudice (ECF No. 6). 

The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that the failure to object 

results in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation 

de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court 

adopting the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 6 at 2). The parties have failed to file any 

objections, and the deadline for objections (March 12, 2018) has lapsed. 
2

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) based on the 

independent consideration of the analysis therein. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants are 

hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In 

Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) and the Magistrate Judge’s subsequent Report and 

Recommendation (ECF No. 3) are hereby MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/ Algenon L. Marbley 

ALGENON L. MARBLEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATED: April 13, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 22449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09248]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FDA-2015-C-1154]


E. & J. Gallo Winery; Filing of Color Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing 
that we have filed a petition, submitted by E. & J. Gallo Winery, 
proposing that the color additive regulations be amended to provide for 
the safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments as color additives in 
certain distilled spirits.

DATES: The color additive petition was filed on March 19, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Salome Bhagan, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-3041.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 721(d)(1) of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1)), we are giving notice 
that we have filed a color additive petition (CAP 5C0302), submitted by 
E. & J. Gallo Winery, c/o Keller and Heckman LLP, Three Embarcadero 
Center, Suite 1420, San Francisco, CA 94111. The petition proposes to 
amend the color additive regulations in Sec.  73.350 Mica-based 
pearlescent pigments (21 CFR 73.350) to provide for the safe use of 
mica-based pearlescent pigments at a level of up to 0.07 percent by 
weight in distilled spirits containing not less than 18 percent and not 
more than 25 percent alcohol by volume, and to remove the current 
exclusion for distilled spirit mixtures containing more than 5 percent 
wine on a proof gallon basis.
    We have determined under 21 CFR 25.32(k) that this action is of a 
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

    Dated: April 15, 2015.
Dennis M. Keefe,
Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2015-09248 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

s1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145407

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145407

COA: 307688

Oakland CC: 2006-208894-FC

TIMOTHY PAUL BUSS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Syndication Net.com,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Brian Sorrentino, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   November 18, 2005

                                        /s/ Brian Sorrentino
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Brian Sorrentino
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, Mitchell H. Gold, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Dendreon Corporation
(the Company), and Martin A. Simonetti, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1.The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



Dated: November 9, 2004



|                           |  |                        
|-------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Mitchell H. Gold, M.D. |  | /s/ Martin A. Simonetti
|Mitchell H. Gold, M.D.     |  | Martin A. Simonetti    
|Chief Executive Officer    |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4275 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4275

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the annex building under construction for the Elbert P. 
Tuttle United States Court of Appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia, as 
               the ``John C. Godbold Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The annex building under construction for the United States 
courthouse located at 56 Forsyth Street in Atlanta, Georgia, known as 
the Elbert P. Tuttle United States Court of Appeals Building, shall be 
known and designated as the ``John C. Godbold Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the annex building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John C. Godbold 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 14, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4275

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the annex building under construction for the Elbert P. 
Tuttle United States Court of Appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia, as 
               the ``John C. Godbold Federal Building''.
```
Connecticut Department of 

ENERGY & 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION 

79 Elm Street " Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer 

July 11, 2012 

David Conroy, Chief, Air Programs Branch 

US EPA - New England 

5 Post Office Square- Suite 100 (Mail Code OEP05-2) 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Re: Commitment Regarding the CAA § 110(a)(2)(A) Portion of Connecticut's Infrastructure 

Submittals for the 1997 and 2006 PM2,5 NAAQS 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) submitted revisions to 

its State Implementation Plan (SIP) addressing the regulatory infrastructure requirements of 

§1 10(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PMZ.5 national 

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) on September 4, 2008 and September 18, 2009, 

respectively. Subsequent clarifications to those submissions, requested by the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA), were submitted on January 7, 2011 and August 19, 2011 . Most recently, 

your staff has requested we specifically incorporate the NAAQS into our regulations. 

We understand that EPA is now preparing conditional approvals of these SIP revisions and has 

requested DEEP provide a commitment to submit such a revision to the Regulations of Connecticut 

State Agencies . As required by EPA staff, DEEP hereby commits to provide a statement of legal 

authority and/or pursue adoption of any necessary regulatory revisions to meet the requirements of 

Section i 10(a)(2)(A) by a date no later than one year from the date on which EPA finalizes 

conditional approval of Connecticut's PM2,5 infrastructure submissions. 

Connecticut appreciates EPA's efforts to move fonvard swiftly with conditional approval of the 

Infi~astructure SIP revisions and approval of Connecticut's redesignation request and maintenance 

plan SIP revision for the PM2.5 NAAQS, submitted on June 22, 2012 . Redesignation of Connecticut's 

portion of the New York/New Jersey/Connecticut area to attainment will formally recognize the 

public health benefits from the successful implementation of federal and state control programs. 

Furthermore, redesignation will streamline the permitting process, thereby reducing regulatory 

burdens and supporting economic growth in the Connecticut portion of the area . 

Thank you for your assistance expediting the approval of this SIP and redesignation. 

Sincerely, 

aw r-4 

Anne Gobin, Chief 

Bureau of Air Management
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17299 and #17300; COLORADO Disaster Number CO-00136]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Colorado (FEMA-4634-DR), dated 12/31/2021. *Incident:*
                         Wildfires and Straight-line Winds. *Incident Period:*
                         12/30/2021 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 12/31/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/01/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/30/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 12/31/2021,  applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations.  The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans*): Boulder. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Colorado: Broomfield, Gilpin, Grand, Jefferson, Larimer, Weld. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.438Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.660Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.830Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.830Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17299 5 and for economic injury is 17300 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Barbara Carson, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2022-00514 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6723

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES EARL POTEET,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-89-136, CA-96-30)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Earl Poteet, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Poteet, Nos. CR-89-136; CA-96-30 (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-54-6

Milahn M. Wright 

ORDER

The court hereby accepts the Rule 11(c)(1)(A) charge agreement

entered into by the parties in this case because the court is

satisfied that the agreement adequately reflects the seriousness of

the actual offense behavior and that accepting the plea agreement

will not undermine the statutory purposes of sentencing.

Date: March 29, 2019 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge

Case: 2:17-cr-00054-JLG Doc #: 425 Filed: 03/29/19 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1325
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4246 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the alternative 

fuels credit for liquified petroleum gas through 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2009 

Mr. WALZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the alternative fuels credit for liquified petroleum gas 

through 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALTERNATIVE FUELS CREDIT FOR LIQUIFIED 

4 PETROLEUM GAS EXTENDED THROUGH 2010. 

5 (a) ALTERNATIVE FUEL CREDIT.—Paragraph (5) of 

6 section 6426(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended by inserting ‘‘December 31, 2010, in the case 

8 of any sale or use involving liquified petroleum gas and’’ 

9 before ‘‘September 30, 2014’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4246 IH

1 (b) ALTERNATIVE FUEL MIXTURE CREDIT.—Para2 graph (3) of section 6426(e) of such Code is amended by 

3 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2010, in the case of any sale or 

4 use involving liquified petroleum gas and’’ before ‘‘Sep5 tember 30, 2014’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 11


                               Washington Bancorp
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share



                                                           Twelve Months ended
                                                              June 30, 1999
                                                          ----------------------
                                                          Basic EPS  Diluted EPS
                                                          ----------------------


Computation of weighted average number of
 common  shares outstanding:
Common shares outstanding at the beginning of the ....     651,133      651,133
 period
Unreleased common shares held by the Employee ........     (42,313)     (42,313)
 Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) at the beginning
 to the period
Weighted average common shares released by the .......       2,171        2,171
 ESOP during the period
Weighted average common shares outstanding -
 Stock Option Plan ...................................          --       14,812
Weighted average common shares purchased .............
 for treasury ........................................     (47,688)     (47,688)
                                                          ---------------------
Weighted average number of common shares .............     563,303      578,115
                                                          ---------------------
Net income ...........................................     831,200      831,200
                                                          ---------------------

Net income per common share ..........................        1.48         1.44
                                                          =====================