alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Inez B. WINGATE, Respondent/Appellant v. Chester A. WINGATE, Sr., Appellant/Respondent.

(347 S. E. 878)

Supreme Court

Dec. 10, 1985.

ORDER

This is a petition for supersedeas. Husband and Wife were divorced on March 18, 1985. Husband has appealed several *575issues, including the alimony issue. Husband’s appeal is currently pending in this.Court.

On June 14, 1985, Husband filed a petition in the Family Court, alleging he was entitled to reduce Wife’s alimony payments because of changed circumstances. The Family Court granted Husband’s petition, and Wife has appealed. Wife now petitions this Court for supersedeas.

Because alimony was an issue on appeal from the divorce decree, this Court had exclusive jurisdiction over the alimony issue, and the Family Court was without jurisdiction to change the amount of alimony during the pendency of the appeal. S. Ct. R. 18, § 3. If Husband desired to have the lower court change its order, he should have petitioned this Court to remand the alimony issue under Supreme Court Rule 18, Section 3C.

The Family Court order on changed circumstances is void. Wife’s appeal is therefore dismissed, and her petition for supersedeas is necessarily denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4425 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4425

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, as the ``Martin G. `Marty' Mahar 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MARTIN G. ``MARTY'' MAHAR POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Martin G. `Marty' Mahar Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Martin G. 
`Marty' Mahar Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:17-cr-164

Also Case No. 2:22-cv-310 

- vs -

District Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 

JOSE DANIEL GONZALEZ-CAMPOS, Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz 

Defendant. :

 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate 

Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 1454) to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b) and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such 

objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and 

Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s § 2255 motion be DENIED. 

Defendant is DENIED a certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United 

States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be 

permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58, the Clerk shall enter judgment to this effect. 

June 6, 2022. s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

District Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

United States District Court

Case: 2:17-cr-00164-EAS-MRM Doc #: 1460 Filed: 06/06/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 7378
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
                        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OSK CAPITAL II CORP.(the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angela Buffa,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 12, 2005


                                /s/ Angela Buffa
                                ----------------
                                Angela Buffa,
                                Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

ERNST & YOUNG LLP



              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Indepenedent Auditors
              ---------------------------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement Nos.
333-21825  and  333-21827 on Form S-8 of Point West Capital  Corporation  of our
report  dated  February 29, 2000,  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements of Point West Capital Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year  ended  December  31,  1999,  filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.



                                                /s/Ernst & Young LLP

San Francisco, California
February 29, 2000
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

DAVID R. GRAHAM,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-718

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 15) 

AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate 

Judge reviewed the pleadings and, on December 27, 2018, submitted a Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 15). No objections were filed. 

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 

of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its

entirety. Accordingly: 

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED; 

2. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED; and

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. 
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 2/27/19 s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge
From: Christopher Bolduc [mailto:cabolduc@lbl.gov]  

Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 10:33 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: Andrew Delaski; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Smith; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson;

Carlos Siqueiros; Caskey, John; Chad Kennedy; Chris Brown; Creevy, Jim; Dan

Cohen; Daniel Young; Eduardo Robles; Edwards, Brenda; Eric Peterson; Freeman,

Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Rosenquist; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Schoen; Jim

Raba; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; Katie Coughlin; Matthew Nardotti; Maxine

Savitz; Meg Waltner; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Polinski,

Raymond; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul;

Scott Beck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas Patzner; Thomas

Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Vijay Tendulkar; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo

Subject: LVDT LCC and NIA Results

Dear Committee Members,

Please find the LCC and NIA results attached for low‐voltage dry‐type

transformers (design lines 6 ‐ 8).

Thank you,

‐‐ Chris

‐‐‐‐ 

Chris Bolduc

Energy Efficiency Standards Group

Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

t. 416‐535‐7546 c. 647‐832‐4021
# jfourtf)**Court of** **Antonio, May** **17,2013 No.** **04-13-00071-CR Jose** **Santos Acosta** **ISIDRO, Appellant** **v. The** **STATE of** **Texas, Appellee** **From the** **22nd District** **Court, Comal** **County, Texas** **Trial Court** **No. CR2001-98** **Mr. Gary** **L. Steel,** **Judge Presiding** 

### ORDER**The State's** **brief was** **originally due** **to be** **filed with** **this court** **on April** **10, 2013.** **This court** **granted the** **State's first** **motion for** **an extension** **of time** **to file** **the brief** **until May** **10,2013. On** **May 15,2013,** **the State** **filed its** **second motion** **for an** **extension of** **time to** **file its** **brief until** **May 31,2013,** **for total** **extension of** **fifty-one days.** **The State's** **motion is** **GRANTED. The** **State's brief** **must be** **filed with** **this court** **not later** **than May** **31,2013. Patricia** **O. Alvarez,** **Justice F,** **have hereunto** **set my** **hand and** **affixed the** **seal of** **the said** 

## $13.**Kei Clerk** **of Court**
## Georgia DepartmentofNatural Resources Environmental Protection Division

A. Stanley Meiberg flPA-UGION H Acting Regional Administrator Atull'i.'A.G4 U.S. EPA, Region 4 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104
RE: Withdrawal ofSection 11O(a)(2)(D)(i)(l) Portion ofthe Georgia's Certification of110(a) Infrastructure Elements forthe 2008 8-HourOzone NAAQs Dear Mr. Meiburg: On March 6, 2012, the Georgia Environmental Division (EPD) submitted a letterto the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certifying that Georgia's current State Implementation Plan (SIP) contains the Section 11O(a) elements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) that meet the requirements of the 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) as revised in 2008. The 11O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) is the interstate transport component, also known as the "good neighbor obligation" and requires the determination of significant contribution to nonattainment or maintenance ofdownwind States. On August 21, 2012, the decision by The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to vacate the 2011 Cross-StateAir Pollution Rule (CSAPR) (EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, No. 11-1302) clarified that only EPA can determine "significant contribution" and that "a SIP cannot be deemed to lack a required submission or be deemed deficient for failing to implement the good neighbor obligation until after EPA has defined the State's good neighbor obligation," which is reiterated in the November 19, 2012 EPA memo from Gina McCarthy, AssistantAdministrator. Atthis time, EPA has yetto determine Georgia's significant contribution ofpollutants, in regards to the 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS, to any downwind State. Therefore, no revision to Georgia's SIP is necessary atthis time to incorporate this element ofSection 11O(a) of the CAA. Once EPA determines Georgia's significant contribution to nonattainment or maintenance areas in downwind States, then EPA may require Georgia to submit a SIP revision under Section 11O(k)(5) or submit a new SIP under Section 110(a)(1) ofthe CAA. Therefore, the certification that GA EPD submitted relating to 11O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) is no longer applicable. As such, the State ofGeorgia hereby withdraws the 11O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) portion ofthe March 6, 2012 submission ofthe Certification of Infrastructure Elements forthe 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS as they pertain to Georgia.A. Stanley Meiburg Page2 of2 

# OCT!OI2013

Ifyou have any questions or need further information, please contact Keith Bentley at (404) 363-7016 orJimmyJohnston at (404) 363-7014. Sincerely,



# . IIC-_

JHT:JPJ:JLK

c: Scott Davis, U.S. EPA Region 4 Keith Bentley, EPD, Air Protection Branch JimmyJohnston, EPD, Air Protection Branch
Exhibit
        31.2
  CERTIFICATION
  I,
        Lan
        Gu, certify that:
  1.
        I have
        reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
        30,
        2008, of Sinoenergy Corporation;
  2.
        Based
        on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
        fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
        in
        light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
        with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.
        Based
        on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
        included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
        condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
        and
        for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.
        The
        registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
        maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
        Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
  a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
        controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
        material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
        subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
        during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
        of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
        by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
        financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
        that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
        the
        registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.
        The
        registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
        recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
        registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
        directors:
  a)
        all
        significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
        of
        internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
        adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
        report financial information; and
  b)
        any
        fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
        who
        have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
        reporting.
 
 Dated:
                  August 14, 2008
              /s/
                  Lan GuChief
                  Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 69842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28417]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

TIME AND PLACE: Thursday, November 29, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting 
will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 321, 811 Vermont Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20571.

OPEN AGENDA ITEMS: Item No. 1: Ex-Im Bank Advisory Committee for 2013 
(Additional New Member).

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public observation 
for Item No. 1 only.

FURTHER INFORMATION: For further information, contact: Office of the 
Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571 (202) 565-3336.

Lisa V. Terry,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-28417 Filed 11-19-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

ALYSSA PORTNOY, et al.,

 Individually and as class action

 representative on behalf of all other

 Plaintiffs similarly situated,

Vs.

NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC.,

 

 

 Defendant.

Case No. 1:17 CV 00834

JUDGE BARRETT

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION WITH 

 SUPPORTING MEMORAND UM FOR AN 

ORDER PROHIBITING NATIONAL 

CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC. FROM 

TRANSFERRING ASSETS

Michael D. Portnoy (0040213)

7024 Cloister Rd.

Toledo, Ohio 43617

PH: (419) 874-2775

FX: (419) 874-2777

Attorney for Plaintiffs

www.hawkport@aol.com

****************************************************************************************************

 Plaintiffs, through counsel, hereby move this Court for an Order prohibiting 

National Credit Systems, Inc. (NCS) from transferring any of its business assets, 

including money, from its possession during the pendency of the lawsuit. A supporting 

memorandum is attached hereto.

 

 Respectfully submitted,

 

s/ Michael D. Portnoy

 Attorney for Plaintiffs

1

Case: 1:17-cv-00834-MRB Doc #: 89 Filed: 04/01/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 686
 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT

NCS, through its representative, Ron Sapp, provided a sworn statement that 

NCS has no insurance coverage for any judgments that may be obtained against it from

this lawsuit.

As a result, Plaintiffs, through counsel, respectfully move this Court for an Order 

prohibiting NCS from transferring any and all of its business assets, including yet not 

limited to cash, office equipment, business contracts, etc. during the pendency of this 

lawsuit.

 Because NCS is facing a class action lawsuit, there is a genuine concern that 

NCS will transfer its business assets to another entity to avoid having its business 

assets seized to pay a potential judgment.

 Ohio Revised Code Section 1336 et al. prohibits a Debtor from transferring its 

assets to avoid attachment from a creditor. NCS is not beyond any such behavior. 

As a result, Plaintiffs’ request for an Order prohibiting NCS from transferring any and all 

of its business assets from its possession during the pendency of this lawsuit is well 

taken and should be granted.

 Respectfully submitted,

s/ Michael D. Portnoy

Attorney for Plaintiffs

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 A copy of this pleading was served by e-mail to all counsel of record. 

 s/ Michael D. Portnoy

 

2

Case: 1:17-cv-00834-MRB Doc #: 89 Filed: 04/01/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 687
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Buddy Struckman,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:17cv772

Hamilton County Prosecutor, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett 

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate 

Judge on November 17, 2017 (Doc. 4). 

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including 

notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and 

Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). 

No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the 

Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate 

Judge, the Complaint (Doc. 3) is dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction and for failure to state a 

claim.

Any request for certificate of appealability or request to certify an appeal would not be 

taken in good faith and would be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Michael R. Barrett 

Michael R. Barrett

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE   CONTAINS   SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED   FROM
GIMMEABID.COM,  INC.,  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   28,821
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         32,992
<PP&E>                                                1,207,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                            2,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        1,238,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   109,202
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  7,603
<OTHER-SE>                                            1,121,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          1,238,618
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          1,882
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           430,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        2,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (430,921)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (430,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (430,921)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.05)


</TABLE>