alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Senior United States Circuit **

Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUN DAING,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney

General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-70210

Agency No. A095-585-118

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 15, 2010

San Francisco, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and ** 

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge.

Whether Daing suffers from a mental impairment that excuses his untimely

asylum application is a disputed factual question over which we lack jurisdiction. 

See Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 650 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). 

FILED

APR 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
page 2

Assessing the severity of Daing’s depression involves an unreviewable

determination “dependent . . . upon the identity of the person.” Id. at 656 (internal

quotation marks omitted) (alteration in original). We lack jurisdiction over the

denial of the motion to reopen because it pertains to the merits of this previouslymade discretionary determination. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 603

(9th Cir. 2006).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of the application for

withholding of removal because Daing didn’t demonstrate a likelihood of future

persecution. Even if we assume that Daing suffered past persecution as a child, the

government has rebutted the presumption based on that persecution by

demonstrating a “fundamental change in circumstances.” Hanna v. Keisler, 506

F.3d 933, 938 (9th Cir. 2007). The immigration judge reasonably found that

“country conditions have quite obviously changed and changed to such a radical

degree that [Daing’s] experiences [pre-1979] provide no basis for a well-founded

fear of future persecution.” Daing’s unpleasant experiences post-1979 don’t rise to

the level of persecution, and therefore don’t establish a presumption of future

persecution.

DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, Unites States
                                      Code)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, Unites States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Orchid BioSciences, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:


The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Sectin 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 14, 2002                  /s/ Dale R. Pfost
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Dale R. Pfost, PhD., President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 14, 2002                  /s/ Donald R. Marvin
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Donald R. Marvin, Senior Vice President,
                                           Chief Operating Officer and Chief
                                           Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Codes) and is not being filed as part of a
separate disclosure document.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3883 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethanol, 2,2′-[[4-[(3,5-dinitro-2- 

thienyl)azo]phenyl]imino]bis-, diacetate (ester). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2009 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethanol, 2,2′-[[4-[(3,5- 

dinitro-2-thienyl)azo]phenyl]imino]bis-, diacetate (ester). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHANOL, 2,2′-[[4-[(3,5-DINITRO-2- 

4 THIENYL)AZO]PHENYL]IMINO]BIS-, DIACE5 TATE (ESTER). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3883 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ethanol, 2,2′-[[4-[(3,5- 

dinitro-2- 

thienyl)azo]phenyl]imino]bis-, 

diacetate (ester). (CAS No. 

42783–06–2) (provided for in 

subheading 2921.59.80) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4111 

To prohibit the prosecution of unprivileged enemy combatants by the 

Department of Justice. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2009 

Mr. TIAHRT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the prosecution of unprivileged enemy 

combatants by the Department of Justice. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PROSECUTION OF 

4 UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY COMBATANTS BY DE5 PARTMENT OF JUSTICE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Department of Justice shall 

7 not prosecute any unprivileged enemy combatant for any 

8 offense. 

9 (b) UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY COMBATANT DEFINED.— 

10 The term ‘‘unprivileged enemy combatant’’ has the meanVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:01 Nov 19, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4111.IH H4111

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4111 IH

1 ing given that term in section 948a(7) of title 10, United 

2 States Code. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
No. 06-15-00106-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

TEXARKANA, TEXAS 

MOISES RENTERIA APPELLANT 

VS

STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE 

 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF OF APPELLANT 

TO HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

 NOW COMES, the Appellant by and through his Attorney, Tim Cone, and does 

hereby move this Honorable Court to grant an extension of time for the purpose of filing 

the Appellant’s Brief.

I.

 Judgment was entered with the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas, in 

Cause Number 38,802-A styled The State of Texas vs. Moises Renteria, on the 1st day 

of August, 2011. An out of time appeal was granted by the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals on June 15, 2015. The Appellant’s brief is due on September 17, 2015. This is 

the Appellant’s first request for an extension of time for the late filing of Appellant’s 

brief. 

ACCEPTED

06-15-00106-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

9/16/2015 7:18:39 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/17/2015 8:12:00 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
Appellant’s attorney requests an extension of time for late filing of a brief until 

October 17th, 2015, and will, hopefully be the last request for extension of time for late 

filing of said brief and would show to the Court the following: Appellant’s attorney was 

on a prepaid vacation from August 21, 2015, through August 30, 2015. Unfortunately, 

upon returning from said vacation, Appellant’s attorney contracted pneumonia and was 

very ill for about 10 days. A great deal of work stacked up during the time of the 

vacation and ensuing illness. Further, Appellant’s attorney has recently submitted a brief 

to this Court in the case of Derek Clinton Ward, Case 06-15-00110-CR. Further, 

although it may be irrelevant, the extension in the case at bar is likely in relation to the 

last brief Appellant’s attorney will submit to this Court due to an impending retirement.

WHERWFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant’s attorney respectfully 

requests that this Honorable Court grant Appellant’s request for an Extension to file a 

late brief until October 17, 2015.

. Respectfully Submitted,

/s/Tim Cone

______________________________

Tim Cone, Attorney At Law

State Bar N. 04660350

P.O. Box 413

Gilmer, Texas 75644

903-725-6270

 e-mail: timcone6@aol.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has been served to Zan Brown,

Assistant Criminal District Attorney for Gregg County, attorney for Appellee, on this 

the 16th day of September, 2015.

/s/Tim Cone

 _____________________________

 Tim Cone, Attorney At Law
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OE S HE R MAN, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. YO L O C OU NT Y C HI E F P R OB AT I ON OF F I C E R ; AT T ORNE Y G E NE R AL OF T HE S T AT E OF C AL I F ORNI A, R e s p o n d e n ts - A p p e lle e s . N o. 08- 17776 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 1 6 4 5 - M CE ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl and, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d A pr i l , 5 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia state p riso n erJo e S h erm an ap p ea ls p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e have j ur i s di c t i on p u r s u a n t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , an dw e a f f irm . 

# FI LED APR19 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d S he rm an’ s pe t i t i on a s s uc c e s s i ve

be c aus e i tw a s hi s s e c ond pe t i t i on c ha l l e ngi ng the s a m e c ondi t i on of hi s pr oba t i on, a n dS h e rm an h a dn o t o b ta in e da n o r d e rf r o m th is C o u rt p u r s u an t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 4 4 ( b ) ( 3 ) ( A ) . Se e C oope rv . Calde r on , 274 F . 3d 1270, 1274 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . A c c o r d in g ly , w e a f f irm th e d is tr ic t c o u rt. W e c ons true S he rm an’ s a ddi t i ona l a r gum e nt s a s am ot i on t o e xpa nd the c e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ility . S o c o n s tru e d , th e m o tio n is d e n ie d . See 9 th C ir . R . 2 2 - 1 ( e ) ; s e e al

s o Hi i v ala v . W

ood , 19 5 F . 3d 10 98 , 11 04 -05 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( per curi am ). AF F I RME D.
TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS

PSP 601−5

TEMPORARY REVISION NO. 5−262

INSERT IN SECTION 5−10−30

FACING PAGE 55

REASON FOR ISSUE: To revise the interval and add a PHASE−IN rule for task 57-40-00-175* (Outboard Flap − 

Lugs) and to add a new task 57-40-01-101* (Inboard Flap − Hinge Box Forward Lugs).

ACTION: Replace task 57-40-00-175* with the tasks that follow:

NOTE: Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY 

and the LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheets at the front of this publication
TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS

PSP 601−5

MAINTENANCE

MANUAL − CH. 5

REFERENCE

ZONE A

CHECK INTERVAL CHAPTER 57 CHECKS DESCRIPTION

57−40−00−175* Outboard Flap − Hinge Box Forward Lugs.

NDT Check. 8000 T

(Ref. PSP 612, Part 6, ET−57−40−10, Part B) LANDINGS

3600 R

LANDINGS

See NOTE

PHASE-IN: For aircraft with more than 7500 Landings but not

more than 11350 Landings at the date of thisTemporary Revision, do this check within 500Landings but not later than 11600 Landings. For aircraft with more than 11350 Landings at thedate of this Temporary Revision, do this checkwithin the next 250 Landings.

584684

581−B584−B681−B684−B
TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS

PSP 601−5

MAINTENANCE

MANUAL − CH. 5

REFERENCE

ZONE A

CHECK INTERVAL CHAPTER 57 CHECKS DESCRIPTION

57−40−01−101* Inboard Flap − Hinge Box Forward Lugs.

NDT Check. 7900 T

(Ref. PSP 612, Part 6, ET−57−40−10, Part A) LANDINGS

7100 R

LANDINGS

See NOTE

PHASE-IN: For aircraft with more than 7400 Landings but not

more than 14850 Landings at the date of thisTemporary Revision, do this check within 500Landings but not later than 15100 Landings.For aircraft with more than 14850 Landings at thedate of this Temporary Revision, do this checkwithin the next 250 Landings.

572672

571−C572−D671−C672−D
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, John Brian Nichols, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of First American Scientific Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 6th day of October, 2003.



| | /s/ Brian Nichols
John Brian Nichols
Principal Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AS
PRESENTED IN THE COMPANY'S 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                          3,958,168
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     771,227
<ALLOWANCES>                       97,538
<INVENTORY>                     1,742,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                7,540,218
<PP&E>                            619,194
<DEPRECIATION>                    194,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,338,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,148,152
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                            25
<COMMON>                              847 
<OTHER-SE>                      7,189,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,338,234
<SALES>                         3,807,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,807,796
<CGS>                           2,725,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,560,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   (6,495)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  108,983
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                462,025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (2,207,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,207,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  (107,274)
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,315,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quintek  Technologies,  Inc.
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Andrew Haag,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

Date:  February 19, 2004

/S/    ANDREW HAAG
-------------------------------
       Andrew Haag
       Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4215 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4215

   To prohibit the inclusion of brucella abortus in certain lists of 
                dangerous biological agents and toxins.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2009

 Mr. Rehberg introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the inclusion of brucella abortus in certain lists of 
                dangerous biological agents and toxins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Brucella Abortus Removal Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF BRUCELLA ABORTUS FROM LISTS.

    (a) In General.--Beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the lists of biological agents and toxins established and 
maintained under section 351A(a)(1) of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)) and section 212(a)(1) of the Agricultural 
Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8401 note) shall not 
include brucella abortus.
    (b) Conforming Changes.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services 
and the Secretary of Agriculture shall revise the regulations, 
guidance, and other materials of the Department of Health and Human 
Services and the Department of Agriculture, respectively, to the extent 
necessary for consistency with subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Linda C. Reddick, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Centillium Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|Date: May 12, 2008 | Linda C. Reddick Chief Financial Officer
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Globix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Peter K. Stevenson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|   |                               |     |                                                 |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------|
|        | *Date:          December 23, 2005* | * * | * *                                             | */s/ Peter K. Stevenson* |
|   | * *                           | * * | *Peter          K. StevensonChief Executive Officer* |
|        |                                    |          |                                                      |  |

 

 

----
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-66374) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-56996 and
333-81848) of deCODE genetics, Inc. ("deCODE") of our report dated March 18,
2002, except for the footnote titled "Restatement of Consolidated Financial
Statements" for which the date is April 2, 2003 relating to the consolidated
financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. We
also consent to the references to us under the heading "Selected Financial Data"
in this Form 10-K/A.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS EHF

Reykjavik, Iceland
April 14, 2003