alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Qiong
      (Laby) Wu, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the year ended June 30, 2006,
      of Franklyn Resources III, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible
      for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
      in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
      have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
      registrant’s board of directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:
              August 18, 2006
            
            /s/
              Qiong (Laby) WuQiong
              (Laby) WuChief
              Financial Officer
# Europeiska unionens C 436/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 436 |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 58 årgången24 december 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 436

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

58 årgången24 december 2015

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Upplysningar |
| | UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN |
| | EuropaparlamentetRådet |
| 2015/C 436/01 | Gemensamt uttalande från Europaparlamentet och rådet om Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 av den 16 december 2015 om ändring av protokoll nr 3 om stadgan för Europeiska unionens domstol | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

IV   Upplysningar

UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN

EuropaparlamentetRådet

2015/C 436/01

Gemensamt uttalande från Europaparlamentet och rådet om Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 av den 16 december 2015 om ändring av protokoll nr 3 om stadgan för Europeiska unionens domstol

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

IV Upplysningar

UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN

Europaparlamentet Rådet

| 24.12.2015 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2015

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

C 436/1

---

Gemensamt uttalande från Europaparlamentet och rådet om Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 av den 16 december 2015 om ändring av protokoll nr 3 om stadgan för Europeiska unionens domstol (1)

(2015/C 436/01)

I slutet av reformprocessen kommer tribunalen att bestå av två domare per medlemsstat. Medlemsstaternas regeringar bör därför, i syfte att uppnå jämställdhet mellan kvinnor och män, vilket är ett av Europeiska unionens mål enligt artikel 3 i EU-fördraget, i största möjliga utsträckning se till att det finns lika många kvinnor som män i processen för utnämning av kandidater till domare vid tribunalen i enlighet med artikel 254 i EUF-fördraget.

---

(1)  EUT L 341, 24.12.2015, s. 14.

---
Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 1 of 13  PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 2 of 13  PAGEID #: 2

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 3 of 13  PAGEID #: 3

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 4 of 13  PAGEID #: 4

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 5 of 13  PAGEID #: 5

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 6 of 13  PAGEID #: 6

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 7 of 13  PAGEID #: 7

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 8 of 13  PAGEID #: 8

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 9 of 13  PAGEID #: 9

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 10 of 13  PAGEID #: 10

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 11 of 13  PAGEID #: 11

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 12 of 13  PAGEID #: 12

Case: 2:17-mj-00734-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/17 Page: 13 of 13  PAGEID #: 13
August 31, 1999

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Gentlemen:

We have read the  statements  made by Ajay Sports, Inc. (copy attached) which we
understand will be filed with the Commission, pursuant to Item 4 of Form 8-K, as
part of the  Company's  Form 8-K report dated August 27, 1999. We agree with the
statements concerning our firm in such Form 8-K.

Very Truly Yours,

\s\Hirsch Silberstein & Subelsky
---------------------------------
Hirsch Silberstein & Subelsky, P.C.


attachment
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

                    On April 8, 2015, in                     **Federal Register**                     Vol. 80, No. 67, Pages 18922-18923, the Small Business Administration (SBA) incorrectly published an interest rate called the optional “peg” rate (13 CFR 120.214). This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. The correct rate is 2.125 (2                    1/8                    ) percent for the April-June quarter of FY 2015.                

Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.

Linda S. Rusche,

Director, Office of Financial Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2015-09106 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 EASTERN DIVISION 

EBONY WHEAT, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 2:17-cv-1100 

 JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH 

 Magistrate Judge Vascura 

STEVEN JACKSON, 

 Defendant. 

 ORDER 

On March 1, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that this matter be remanded back to the Franklin County Court 

of Common Pleas due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 8). The parties were advised 

of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation. This matter is now before the Court 

on Defendant’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (See Doc. 9). Because 

Defendant filed objections, the Court reviews de novo those portions to which an objection has 

been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). De novo review in these 

circumstances requires at least a review of the evidence before the magistrate judge; the Court 

may not act solely on the basis of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Hill v. 

Duriron Co., 656 F.2d 1208, 1215 (6th Cir. 1981). 

Defendant objects to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation of remand, arguing that this 

matter is properly in federal court based on diversity of the parties because he is not a United 

States citizen. He also continues to argue the same arguments considered by the Magistrate 

Judge in her Report and Recommendation, that the state court should have applied federal law, 
2 

including the Social Security Act, and that the state court decision was incorrect. 

The Court has considered Defendant’s objections and agrees with the well-reasoned 

decision of the Magistrate Judge that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine precludes federal court 

jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge has not erred in the decision 

recommending remanding this case back to state court. 

For the reasons stated above, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

hereby ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. This case is hereby remanded to the Franklin County 

Court of Common Pleas. 

The Clerk shall remove Documents 6, 8, and 9 from the Court’s pending motions list and 

remand this case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ George C. Smith__________________ 

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Highlands Insurance Group, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-3 (No.333-51693 and No. 333-82135) and Form S-8 (No. 333-34701, No. 333-55699
and No. 333-82141) of Highlands Insurance Group, Inc. of our report dated April
9, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Highlands Insurance
Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity,
comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period
ended December 31, 2001, and all related schedules, which report appears in the
December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Highlands Insurance Group, Inc.

Our report dated April 9, 2002 contains a disclaimer of opinion. The Company has
suffered recurring net losses and has a net capital deficiency. As of December
31, 2001, the Company was in violation with various debt covenants and such debt
is due on demand, or if no demand is made, April 30, 2002. In February 2002, the
Company's significant insurance subsidiaries were placed under regulatory
supervision due to their adverse financial condition, whereby the regulatory
agencies have authority to take any number of actions, including taking over
control of the insurance subsidiaries. These matters raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
statements and financial statement schedules do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
April 9, 2002
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CHRISTOPHER TODD MAYER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-30329

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00050-HRH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

H. Russel Holland, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2011** 

Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Todd Mayer appeals from certain supervised release conditions

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bank robbery, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

OCT 4 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-30329

Mayer contends that because there was no evidence in the record indicating

that he was a drug or alcohol abuser, the district court plainly erred by imposing

drug- and alcohol-related supervised release conditions. The district court properly

imposed the mandatory drug-related supervised release conditions because the

evidence before it did not support a finding that Mayer was a low risk of future

substance abuse. See United States v. Carter, 159 F.3d 397, 399-400 (9th Cir.

1998). Additionally, the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the

discretionary drug- and alcohol-related conditions because such conditions,

including the condition that Mayer refrain from excessive use of alcohol, were

reasonably related to the purposes of sentencing and involved no greater

deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d); Carter,

159 F.3d at 400-01. 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4171 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4171

To repeal the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to extend the 
         Troubled Asset Relief Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2009

   Mr. Teague (for himself, Ms. Markey of Colorado, Ms. Kosmas, Mr. 
 Kissell, and Mrs. Halvorson) introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to extend the 
         Troubled Asset Relief Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TARP Sunset and Fiscal 
Responsibility Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TARP EXTENSION AUTHORITY.

    Section 120 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 
U.S.C. 5230) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) Termination.--''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b).

SEC. 3. TARP FUNDS USED TO PAY DOWN NATIONAL DEBT.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all funds repaid, and 
profits paid, to the Secretary of the Treasury by companies in 
connection with assistance received under the Troubled Asset Relief 
Program under title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 
2008 shall be used to pay down the national debt.

SEC. 4. REDUCTION OF STATUTORY LIMIT ON THE PUBLIC DEBT.

    (a) In General.--Section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by inserting ``minus the amount 
        described in subsection (d)'' before ``, outstanding at one 
        time''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) The amount described in this subsection is $700,000,000,000 
minus the amount of troubled assets purchased by the Secretary of the 
Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program under title I of the 
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 outstanding on December 
31, 2009, but in no case shall the amount described in this subsection 
be less than $0.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The provisions of this section shall take 
effect on January 1, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

JAYME LAURENT,

Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:17-cv-343

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

Vv.
TROY DILTZ, et a/.,

Defendants.

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS MONTGOMERY
COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
AND SHERIFF ROB STRECK’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS
THEIR THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST NAPHCARE, INC.
(DOC. #52); DISMISSING THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT WITHOUT
PREJUDICE

On July 10, 2019, Defendants Montgomery County, the Montgomery
County Board of Commissioners and Sheriff Rob Streck moved to dismiss their
Third-Party Complaint against NaphCare, Inc., Doc. #14, without prejudice,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Doc. #52. No memoranda in opposition has
been filed within the time allotted.

Accordingly, the Court SUSTAINS Defendants’ motion, Doc. #52, and
DISMISSES the Third-Party Complaint Against NaphCare, Inc., Doc. #14,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Date: August 1, 2019 Lp dp Con

WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

S&S HEALTHCARE STRATEGIES, 

LTD.

Plaintiff,

v.

THREE RIVERS PROVIDER 

NETWORK, INC., 

 Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL

Judge Bertelsman

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF 

CRAIG KRUMBHAAR

Please take notice that pursuant to Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

Plaintiff, S&S Healthcare Strategies, Ltd., by and through counsel, will take the deposition of 

CRAIG KRUMBHAAR on Tuesday, October 29, 2019 beginning at 9:00 a.m. The deposition 

will be conducted at Eagleview Corporate Center, 600 Eagleview Blvd, Ste. 300, Exton, PA 

19341. Said deposition will be taken via video conference in the presence of a Notary Public, or 

some officer authorized by law to take depositions, and will continue day to day until completed.

Plaintiffs are taking said deposition according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 

said deposition shall be used for any purpose contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. Plaintiff reserves the right to conduct such further depositions and discovery from 

Bryan Hebert as may arise at a later date.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Peter A. Saba

Peter A. Saba (0055535)

Jeffrey M. Nye (0082247)

STAGNARO, SABA

& PATTERSON CO., L.P.A.

2623 Erie Avenue

Cincinnati, Ohio 45208

(513) 533-2701

(513) 533-2711 (fax)

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 46 Filed: 10/24/19 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 251
2

pas@sspfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing was served on all counsel of record 

via CM/ECF this 24th day of October 2019.

/s/ Peter A. Saba

Peter A. Saba (0055535)

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 46 Filed: 10/24/19 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 252
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 4,
2011 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2011-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (f/k/a AmeriCredit Corp.), AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.
The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive
Vice President, Accounting Corporate Controller of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|                                |  |                   |  |  |  |                       |  | 
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ Connie Coffey |  |  |  | Dated: March 28, 2014
|Connie Coffey                   |  |                   |  |  |  |                      
|Executive Vice President,       |  |                   |  |  |  |                      
|Accounting Corporate Controller |  |                   |  |  |  |