### 25450 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Notices

Awards may be subject to Federal income taxes and HHS will comply with IRS withholding and reporting requirements, where applicable. Payment of the Prize

Prize will be paid by contractor. Basis upon which Phase I finalists and Phase II grand prize winner will be selected:

Challenge submissions will be judged by a panel selected by ONC and NCI with relevant expertise based on the following criteria:

1. The submission is an innovative information management tool or application deployable on any personal computing platform widely available to

consumers;

2. The tool or application addresses the needs of cancer survivors managing their transition from specialty to primary care;

3. Usability and design; 4. Evidence of co-design with, and support from users of proposed tool or application (e.g., patients, families, primary/specialty caregivers, insurers, and/or hospital systems);

5. Innovation and differentiation from existing technologies and products;

6. Functionality, accuracy, integration with electronic care platforms, and use of Blue Button+ standards (bluebuttonplus.org) and other sources of health-related information; and,

7. Customizability and ability to adapt to evolving survivorship care needs including primary/specialist care interactions.

In order for an entry to be eligible to win this Challenge, it must meet the following requirements:

1. General —Entrants must provide continuous access to the application to judges during the evaluation period, a detailed description of the application, instructions on how to install and operate the application, and system requirements required to run the application (collectively, ‘‘Submission’’).

2. Acceptable platforms—The tool must be designed for use with any personal computing platform widely available to the average consumer.

3. No HHS, ONC, NIH, or NCI logos— The application must not use HHS’, ONC’s, or NCI’s logos or official seals in the Submission, and must not claim endorsement.

4. Section 508 Compliance—Entrants must acknowledge that they understand that, as a pre-requisite to any subsequent acquisition by FAR contract or other method, they may be required to make their proposed solution compliant with Section 508 accessibility and usability requirements at their own expense. Any electronic information technology that is ultimately obtained by HHS for its use, development, or maintenance must meet Section 508 accessibility and usability standards. Past experience has demonstrated that it can be costly for solution-providers to ‘‘retrofit’’ solutions if remediation is later needed. The HHS Section 508 Evaluation Product Assessment Template, available at http:// www.hhs.gov/web/508/contracting/ technology/vendors.html , provides a useful roadmap for developers to review. It is a simple, web-based checklist utilized by HHS officials to allow vendors to document how their products do or do not meet the various Section 508 requirements.

5. Functionality/Accuracy —A Submission may be disqualified if the application fails to function as expressed in the description provided by the user, or if the application provides inaccurate or incomplete information.

6. Security —Submissions must be free of malware. Entrant agrees that the ONC may conduct testing on the application to determine whether malware or other security threats may be present. ONC may disqualify the application if, in ONC’s judgment, the application may damage government or others’ equipment or operating environment.

Additional Information

Online Resources

Blue Button: http://www.healthit.gov/

bluebutton Blue Button+ Implementation Guide:

http://bluebuttonplus.org/ Follow-up Care After Cancer

Treatment: http://www.cancer.gov/ cancertopics/factsheet/Therapy/ followup Transitional Care Planning: http://

www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/ supportivecare/transitionalcare/ Patient/page2 A Tough Transition: Survivorship

Care Plans Slow to Take Hold: http://www.cancer.gov/ ncicancerbulletin/062612/page5 NCI funding announcement on ‘‘Examination of Survivorship Care Planning Efficacy and Impact’’ PA–12–274: http://grants.nih.gov/

grants/guide/pa-files/PA-12- 274.html PA–12–275: http://grants.nih.gov/

grants/guide/pa-files/PA-12- 275.html Intellectual Property

Ownership of intellectual property is determined by the following:

• Each entrant retains title and full ownership in and to their submission. Entrants expressly reserve all intellectual property rights not expressly granted under the Challenge agreement.

• By participating in the Challenge, each entrant hereby irrevocably grants to ONC and NCI (Sponsors) and Health2.0 (Administrator) a limited, nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license and right to reproduce, publically perform, publically display, and use the Submission to the extent necessary to administer the Challenge, and to publically perform and publically display the Submission, including, without limitation, for advertising and promotional purposes relating to the Challenge.

General Conditions: ONC and NCI reserve the right to cancel, suspend, and/or modify non-prize elements of the Contest, or any part of it, for any reason, at ONC and NCI’s discretion. Participation in this Contest constitutes an entrant’s full and unconditional agreement to abide by the Contest’s Official Rules found at www.challenge.gov.

Privacy Policy: ChallengePost collects personal information from you when you register on Challenge.gov. The information collected is subject to the ChallengePost privacy policy located at www.challengepost.com/privacy

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 3719. Dated: April 24, 2013. Farzad Mostashari, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2013–10192 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4150–45–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES** 

**Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality** 

**Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;**  **Comment Request**

**AGENCY :**  Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces the intention of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposedinformation collection project: ‘‘PatientReported Health Information Technology and Workflow.’’ In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521, AHRQ invites the public to comment on this proposed information collection.


### 25451 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Notices

This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on February 13th, 2013 and allowed 60 days for public comment. No comments were received. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.

**DATES :**  Comments on this notice must be received by May 31, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQ’s OMB Desk Officer by fax at (202) 395–6974 (attention: AHRQ’s desk officer) or by email at OIRA

_ submission@omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ’s desk officer).

Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by email at dorislefkowitz@AHRO.hhs.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Proposed Project

Patient-Reported Health Information Technology and Workflow.

Health IT can improve quality of care by arraying relevant information, displaying clinical guidelines, highlighting test values of concern, calculating medication doses, and supporting clinical decisionmaking in many ways (Chaudhry et al., 2006). Successful health IT implementation requires careful attention to the workflow of clinicians and others involved in care delivery. However, few studies have examined how health IT can change workflow in ambulatory physician practices. Further, in most studies that address health IT in ambulatory settings, workflow is not the main focus of the research (Unertl, Weinger, Johnson et al., 2009, Carayon, Karsh, Cartmill et al., 2010a). The health IT literature has not focused on sociotechnical factors, such as patient or provider characteristics, physical environment and layout; technical training and support; functionality and usability of health IT; worker roles, staff workload, stress, and job satisfaction; and communication flows. Important work that does address such factors comes mainly from inpatient settings, or from other countries where the health care system is quite different than in the U.S. (Tjora and Scambler, 2009; Ammenwerth, filer, and Mahler, 2006; Niazkhani, Pirnejad, de Bont et al., 2008; Niazkhani, Pirnejad, Berg et al., 2009). Although many of these studies have concluded that changes in workflow occur when implementing different health IT applications, few studies have actually examined how workflow changes.

In recent years there has been an increase in the use of health IT to capture patient reporting of medicalhistories, symptoms, results of selftesting (e.g., blood glucose levels, blood pressure), weight questions and concerns, over-the-counter medication use, and other information that patients need to share with their care providers. Health IT can elicit such information from patients, and help incorporate it into the flow of information within a physician’s practice so that the information is detailed, actionable, timely, and can be used to meet patients’ treatment goals. Gathering and integrating information from patients using health IT can include:

• Patient portals, sometimes referred to as (electronic) personal health records or PHRs, allow patients to view portions of their medical records (e.g., laboratorytest results), and support other healthrelated tasks such as making appointments or requesting medication refills. Some patient portal applications exist as standalone Web sites; other portal applications are integrated into an existing electronic health record [ERR] system;

• Secure messaging with patients (use of secure email between patients and clinicians, typically using the secure messaging functionality in the ERR and/ or patient portal) (Byrne, Elliott, and Firek, 2009; Bergmo, Kummervold, Gammon et al., 2005); and

• E-forms (surveys that are administered using computerized media [e.g., tablets, laptops] to collectinformation from patients using preformatted forms before or during patient visits).

The use of patient-reported information is not yet widely integrated into health IT. This project will fill the gaps in the current literature by exploring the influence of sociotechnical factors—for clinicians and their office staff, and for patients— in capturing and using patient-reported information in ambulatory health IT systems and associated workflows. The goal of the project is to answer the following research questions:

• How does the use of health IT to capture and use patient-reported information support or hinder the workflow from the viewpoints of clinicians, office staff, and patients?

• How does the sociotechnical context influence workflow related to the capture and use of patient-reported information? • How do practices redesign their workflow to incorporate the capture and use of patient-reported information?

The study will consist of rigorous mixed-methods case studies of six ambulatory care physician practices including three small practices (1–4 physicians and the other clinicians and office staff in their practices) and three medium-sized practices (5–10 physicians, and the other clinicians and office staff in their practices). These case studies will be conducted during multiday (3 to 4 days) site visits to collect information for this exploratory research. The multiple case study research approach of Eisenhardt and colleagues (Brown & Eisenhardt, 1997; Eisenhardt, 1989) will guide data collection and data analysis, to elucidate health IT workflows and important sociotechnical factors (for patients, clinicians, and office staff) in the capture and use of patient-reported information.

A focus of the case studies will be to identify current workflows related to patient-reported information, and determine the work system factors that influence workflows (barriers and facilitators). In particular, data collected from the six practices will help identify bottlenecks and sources of delay, unnecessary steps or duplication, rework to correct errors or inconsistencies, role ambiguity, missing information, and lack of data quality controls or reconciliation of inconsistencies. The focus is not on the content of information reported by patients, or how it alters clinicians’ diagnostic or treatment decisions. Rather, the focus is on the workflows required to capture, process, and make use of information that patients report to their care providers.

This study is being conducted by AHRQ through its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., and subcontractors University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Alabama-Birmingham, pursuant to AHRQ’s statutory authority to conduct and support research on health care and on systems for the delivery of such care, including activities with respect to health care technologies and the quality, effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness and value of health care services including quality measurement and improvement. 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(1), (2) and (5).

Method of Collection

To achieve the goal of this project the following activities will be conducted at each of six participating ambulatory physician practices (referred to herein as ‘study sites’):


### 25452 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Notices

(1) Preliminary Conference Call: The Practice Manager (the individual in each practice who manages day-to-day operations) and the Physician Leader (the physician in each practice who is most knowledgeable about health IT and health IT implementation) will be asked to participate in a preliminary conference call to learn about the study site and what will be expected of their practice as a study site. This call will last approximately one hour and will be completed by up to 2 participants per site for a total of up to 12 participants across sites.

(2) Pre-Visit Questionnaire: The Practice Manager will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire prior to the site visit, describing the practice size, health IT installed, patient population served, and other general contextual information about thepractice and use of health IT. The PreVisit Questionnaire will take approximately one hour to complete and will be completed by up to one respondent per study site.

(3) Practice Tour: Each of the six site visits will begin with a one-hour tour of the practice and discussion with the Practice Manager to observe the physical layout and computer work stations, clarify the purpose of the study and the site visit, and clarify information from the Pre-Visit Questionnaire.

(4) Interviews with Practice Manager and Physician Leader: Following the tour at each study site, the Practice Manager and Physician Leader will be asked to participate in a one hour interview. The interview with the Practice Manager will focus on the sociotechnical context of the practice, with an emphasis on the social context of the practice. The interview with the Physician Leader will also focus on the sociotechnical context of the practice, and, in particular, the technical aspects of clinicians using the health IT system. The focus will be on the workflow across the practice, not the workflow of these two individuals. This information will be used to create the basic outline or structure of a Workflow Process Map(s), a diagram that shows the temporal sequencing of tasks in relation to other work system elements (person, organization, environment, and tools and technologies). It will also be used to begin to identify potential variation or flexibility in individuals’ workflows, and provide context regarding multiple IT systems that may be in use in the practice. The information obtained from these interviews will be augmented by observation of workflows in the practice and interviews with others in the practice, as described in #5 and #6. (5) Observations of Clinicians and Office Staff: Researchers will observe between 8 to 20 clinicians (including physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, medical assistants, and ancillary staff) and between 3 to 7 office staff (including the front desk receptionist, IT staff, clerks, and other non-clinical staff) per study site, depending on site size for a total of up to 84 clinicians and up to 30 office staff observations across the study sites. Observations will take place as clinicians and office staff work to elicit,integrate and work with patientreported information. Each clinician will be observed for up to two hours and each office staff person will be observed for up to 30 minutes. These observations periods are different because clinicians’ work is more complex and varies more from one patient to the next, while office staff work varies less. Observations will focus on processes, bottlenecks, facilitators, workarounds, and points in the workflow when paper information supplements electronic information. Observations of both clinicians and office staff will be recorded on the Observation Form. The observations will be used to create a detailed Workflow Process Map(s). This data collection will not burden the clinic staff and is not included in the burden estimates in Exhibit 1.

(6) Interviews with Clinicians and Office Staff: Following observations of the workflow, each clinician and office staff person who was observed will be interviewed for up to one hour, for a total of up to 84 clinicians and up to 30 office staff interviews. If there are more clinicians or office staff than can be interviewed during the site visit, those with the most extensive experience with patient-reported information will be selected for interviews. These interviews will include discussion about the sociotechnical context, the workflow observed (see above), facilitators and barriers to capturing and using patient-reported information, and whether there are uncommon workflow patterns that arise occasionally but were not observed. Unlike the interviews with the Physician Leader and Practice Manager, these interviews will focus on the workflow of each individual, not the workflow across the entire practice. The same interview guide will be used for both clinician and office staff interviews.

(7) Survey of Clinicians and Office Staff: All clinicians and office staff in the six study sites will be invited to respond to a survey. Although there may not be sufficient time on site to observe and interview every clinicianand office staff person in the mediumsized practices, all of them will be asked to complete the survey questionnaire. Therefore, the number of survey respondents is greater than the number of observed and interviewed individuals. Up to 11 surveys will be completed at each small-sized study site and up to 35 surveys will be completed at each medium-sized study site, for a total of up to 138 respondents across the six sites. The surveys will be used to collect data regarding attitudes about and perceptions of the health IT workflows staff engage in related to patient-reported information and the impact of health IT on workload, stress, and job satisfaction, because workflow can impact workload and job satisfaction which have been shown to impact quality of care. The survey will also be used to collect data on barriers and facilitators associated with capturing and using patient-reported information.

(8) Patient Interviews: Patients will be interviewed to the understand the workflow of entering or reporting information from the patient’s perspective; the extent and adequacy of training or instruction patients received in using the health IT; attitudes about the time it takes to report information; and whether there are challenges, barriers, facilitators, or workarounds commonly used by patients as they report information requested by their cue providers. Five patients will be interviewed at each small practice and up to seven at each medium-sized practice, for a total of up to 36 across the six study sites. More patients will be interviewed in the medium-sized practices because there are more clinicians in these practices, and each may have different patterns of interacting with their patients. Interviewing more patients will enhance the ability to capture information about variation in the clinician-patient information sharing and interaction. These interviews will help researchers understand the range of patient experiences.

(9) Post-Visit Follow-up to Review the Workflow Process Map(s): Following each site visit, researchers will complete the Workflow Process Map(s) for the study-site and send it to the Practice Manager and Physician Leader, requesting confirmation that the understanding of their workflows is
correct.

The lessons learned from this research may be used in a variety of ways:

(1) To identify additional workflow components that ambulatory practices should consider when implementinghealth IT to capture and use patientreported information;


### 25453 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Notices

(2) To identify issues relevant to best practice guidelines for health IT implementation;

(3) To identify issues for consideration in the design and evaluation of other patient-centered health IT tools.

The study findings will be widely disseminated to health IT researchers and implementers via AHRQ’s National Resource Center for Health IT Web site. The study will enhance the existing knowledge about sociotechnical factors that impact health IT workflow, and how small and medium-sized ambulatory practices employ health IT to capture and use patient-reported information as they redesign their workflow to deliver patient-centered

care. Estimated Annual Respondent Burden

Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annual burden hours for the respondents’ time to participate in this research. The Preliminary Conference Call with each site will involve two people, the Practice Manager and the Physician Leader, and will require up to one hour per site. A total of 12 people across the six study sites will be involved.

The Pre-Visit Questionnaire and the Practice Tour will be completed by the Practice Manager at each site and will require up to one hour each. The Practice Manager and the Physician Leader at each site (12 individuals in total across the 6 sites) will be separately interviewed to gather in depth information about the sociotechnical context of the practice. The interviews will each take up to one hour to complete.

Interviews with Clinicians and Office Staff will be completed with a maximum of 114 clinicians and office staff across the six study sites, and each interview will last up to one hour. A maximum of 138 clinicians and office staff combined (up to 11 for each of three small-sized sites and 35 for each of 3 medium-sized sites) will be asked to complete the clinician and office staff survey, which will take approximately 15 minutes for each respondent to complete.

Up to 36 patients will be interviewed (5 in each of the small sites and up to 7 in each of the medium-sized sites). Each interview will take no more than 30 minutes to complete. A total of 12 persons (the Practice Manager and the Physician Leader at each site) will be involved in the Post-Visit Follow-up to Review the Workflow Process Map(s), which will take one hour. The total annual burden hours, is estimated to be 215 hours.

Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annual cost burden associated with the study sites’ time to participate in the research. The total annual cost burden is estimated to be $10,815.



### E XHIBIT 

### 1—E STIMATED 

### A NNUALIZED 

### B URDEN 

### H OURS

Form name Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Hours per response Total burden hours

Preliminary Conference Call ............................................................................ 12 1 1 12 Pre-Visit Questionnaire .................................................................................... 6 1 1 6 Practice Tour ................................................................................................... 6 1 1 6 Interviews with Practice Manager and Physician Leader ................................ 12 1 1 12 Interviews with Clinicians and Office Staff ...................................................... 114 1 1 114 Survey of Clinicians and Office Staff ............................................................... 138 1 15/60 35 Patient Interviews ............................................................................................ 36 1 30/60 18 Post Visit Follow-up to Review the Workflow Process Map(s) ....................... 12 1 1 12

Total .......................................................................................................... 336 N/A N/A 215



### E XHIBIT 

### 2—E STIMATED 

### A NNUALIZED 

### C OST 

### B URDEN

Form name Number of respondents Total burden hours Average hourly wage rate * Total cost burden

Preliminary Conference Call ............................................................................ 12 12 a $67.15 $806 Pre-Visit Questionnaire .................................................................................... 6 6 b 46.17 277 Practice Tour ................................................................................................... 6 6 b 46.17 277 Interviews with Practice Manager and Physician Leader ................................ 12 12 a 67.15 806 Interviews with Clinicians and Office Staff ...................................................... 114 114 c 50.97 5,811 Survey of Clinicians and Office Staff ............................................................... 138 35 46.89 1,641 Patient Interviews ............................................................................................ 36 18 e 21.74 391 Review of the Workflow Process Map(s) ........................................................ 12 12 a 67.15 806

Total .......................................................................................................... 336 215 N/A 10,8 15

*Based upon the mean of the average hourly wages, National Compensation Survey: Occupational wages in the United States May 201 1, ‘‘U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

a The average wage for Practice Managers ($46.17 per hour) and Physician Leaders ($88.12 per hour) [$88.12 reflects the average f or Family and General Practitioners ($85.26 per hour) and Internists, General ($90.97 per hour)].

b The average U.S. wage for Practice Managers is $46.17 per hour.

c The weighted average wage for physicians ($88.12 per hour) [$88.12 reflects the average for Family and General Practitioners ($ 85.26 per hour) and Internists, General ($90.97 per hour)], nurse practitioners and physician assistants ($41.63 per hour) [$41.63 reflects the average for Physician Assistants ($43.01 per hour) and Health Diagnosing and Treating Practitioners, All ($40.24 per hour)], nurses ($33.23per hour), and Office Staff ($17.94) [reflects the average for Receptionists and Information Clerks ($12.85 per hour), Office and Administrati on Support Workers, All Other ($16.07 per hour), and Computer Support Specialists ($24.91 per hour)].

d The weighted average wage for physicians ($88.12), nurse practitioners and physician assistants ($41.63), nurses ($33.23) and o ffice staff ($17.94).

e The average U.S. hourly wage ($21.74).


### 25454 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Notices

Request for Comments

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ’s information collection are requested with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ health care research and health care information dissemination functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the Agency’s subsequent request for OMB approval of the proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of public record.

Dated: April 15, 2013. Carolyn M. Clancy,

Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–09741 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4160–90–M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND**  **HUMAN SERVICES**

**Centers for Disease Control and Prevention** 

**[Docket Number NIOSH–161–A]**

**Issuance of Final Guidance Publication**

**AGENCY :**  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

**ACTION :**  Notice of issuance of final guidance publication.

**SUMMARY :**  The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), announces the availability of the following publication: ‘‘NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin 65: Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers’’ [2013–145].

**ADDRESSES :**  This document may be obtained at the following link: Web site: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2013– 145/.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Charles Geraci, NIOSH, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, MS–C14, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226, telephone (513) 533–8339.

Dated: April 25, 2013. John Howard, Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013–10244 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND**  **HUMAN SERVICES**

**Administration for Children and Families** 

**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

Title: Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Program Model Plan Application.

OMB No.: 0970–0382. Description: Sections 676 and 677 of the Community Services Block Grant Act require States, including the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Tribes, Tribal organizations and U.S. territories applying for Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) funds to submit an application and plan (Model Application Plan). The application plan must meet statutory requirements prior to being funded with CSBG funds. Applicants have the option to submit a detailed application annually or biannually. Entities that submit a biannual application must provide an abbreviated application the following year if substantial changes to the initial application will occur. OMB approval is being sought.

Respondents: State Governments, including the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Tribal Governments, Tribal Organizations, and U.S. territories.



### A NNUAL 

### B URDEN 

### E STIMATES

Instrument Number of respondents Number of responses per

respondent Average burden hours per response Total burden hours

Model State CSBG Application ....................................................................... 56 1 10 560

Model Indian Tribes & Tribal Organizations CSBG Application .................. 30 1 10 300

Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 860.

Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 L’Enfant Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. Email address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov

.

OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register

. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Fax: 202– 395–7285, Email: OIRA

_ SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV

, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration for Children and Families.

Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–10235 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4184–01–P**