alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
MONTIE SULLIVAN,
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00974
Petitioner, JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura
v.

RHONDA RICHARD, WARDEN,
MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER

On November 8, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation
pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District
Courts recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254
be dismissed. (Doc. 2.) Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no
objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action
is hereby DISMISSED.

Petitioner has failed his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the

Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT ISSO ORDERED. LincMed gy

tat L. MARBLEY—
United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-256 (1)

Judge Marbley

Lloyd Anthony Warren 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 23) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Counts 1 of the Indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The Court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: February 23, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the yearly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Linda Baddour, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: March 2, 2006
22156

#### CHARLESTON HOUSEWRECKING COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. CANADIAN UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

(319 S. E. (2d) 338)

Supreme Court

*444
      *Joseph R. Young,*of *Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale,*Charleston, *for appellant.*

*B. C. Killough,*Charleston, *for respondent.*

Submitted June 14, 1984.

Decided Aug. 15, 1984.

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant, Canadian Universal Insurance Company asserts the trial court erroneously denied its motion for summary judgment, contending it had no duty to defend respondent, Charleston Housewrecking Company, in an action for damages instituted by a third party.

We find appellant’s sole exception to be in violation of Supreme Court Rule 4, § 6, as it does not contain a complete assignment of error. “This defect is sufficient to warrant dismissal of this appeal.” *Simmons v. Johnson,*279 S. C. 146, 303 S. E. (2d) 101, 102 (1983).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 4, § 6.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of World Am, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Robert
      Kline, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                November 15, 2007
            /s/
                C. Robert KlineBy:
                C. Robert KlineIts:
                Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      World Am, Inc. and will be retained by World Am, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at June 30, 1998 Audited and
the Consolidated Statement of Income for the twelve months ended June 30,
1998 Audited and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,548
<PP&E>                                       2,260,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                 200,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,105,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          945,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,326
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,110,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,105,646
<SALES>                                        665,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               665,638
<CGS>                                          290,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,290,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               157,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,072,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,072,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,072,922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 56767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22345]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8471]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Saudi Arabia

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L.112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6), and Department of 
State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act and similar provisions of 
law in prior year Acts with respect to Saudi Arabia, and I hereby waive 
this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 15, 2013.
William J. Burns,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-22345 Filed 9-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
```
Au g 0 2 1 1 03:23 p DRED F (51° ) 549-933 9 p. 1 

### Disabilit yRight s Educatio n & Defens

e Fun d DRFP F *

• . . > • Comment s on : DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO

N Office o f th e Secretar y 1 4 CF RPar t 38 2 [Docke t

No
. DOT-OST-2011-0098 ] RI N 2105-AD8 7

e n

, ' U J > -J O ••Z D r\ > ;n:2:-,i ^

—\o..-•', ' r^~^r: 3 -oO.T-- ^ rri-opi ^ ^—j~" ' 

### oo o >"- ^ ' C O Nondiscriminatio n o n th e Basi s o f Disabilit y i n Ai r

Travel ; Accessibilit y o f

Aircraf t an dStowag e o f

Wheelchair s Submitte dby : Disabilit y Right s Educatio n an dDefens e Fun d(DREDF ) ~ ~ Marilyn Golde

n Policy Analys t (510 ] 644-255 5 mgolden@dredf.org Vi aFAX: (202)4-93-225 1 DRED Fstrongl y oppose s an y chang e i n th e curren t

prohibitio n o

f sea t strapping
. Th e purpos e o

f th e original rul e wa s t o guarante e th e saf e dignifie dpassag e o

f a t leas t on e manual folding wheelchair , an dsea t strappin g ha s th e opposit e effec t It' s stigmatizing , regardles s o

f whethe r an y passenger s ar e bumpe dt o make roo mfo r th e wheelchair
. It' s awkwar dan ddifficult , becaus e tw o chair s will rarel y b e strappe dth e sam e way . I f s time

consuming , especiall y i

f th e perso n o r

person s wh o strappe dth e chai r ar e no t th e one s unstrappin g i t

a t th e destination
. Fo r eas e o f saf e stowage , nothin g beat s adedicate dclose t space . Th e chai r

simpl y need s t o b e folde dan dstowed , an dneedn' t b e secured
. Man

y peopl e at

ou r organizatio n us e ai r trave l frequently , an di t

i s ou r observatio n tha t

ai r carrier s hav e gotte n use dt o thi s practice
. As amanual wheelchai r user , ai r carrie r personne l hav e offere dm e thi s accommodatio n o n man y occasions , absen t an y reques t

b y me . Moreover , i

n mos t cases , ai r carrier s will alread y hav e aspac e somewher e fo r thi s purpose . Fo r example , i

f aclose t i s no t available , ther e i s often spac e behin dth e las t ro w o f seats . Moreover , arul e allov\nn

g sea t strappin g i s afals e promise
. Thes e days , on ai r trave l i n th e US , n o seatin g spac e will b e available
. Tha t set s up achai n o

f very problemati c consequence s tha t

shoul db e th e responsibility o f ai r carriers , no t

peopl e wit

h disabilities
. Th e stigm ainvolve di n bumpin g othe r passenger s i s significant , an dcompletel y inconsisten t

wit h th e essenc e o

f th e civil right s la

w suc h a s th e Ai

r Carrier Acces s Act
.

m m i OFFICE : 307 5 Adelin e Street , Suit e 21 0 • Berkeley , C A 9470 3 * 510.644.255 5 • 510.841.864 5 fax/tt y• www.dredf.or g GO'/EPcNMEM I mAlR S 0?F[CE : 166 0 L Street , NW , Suit e 70 0 • Washington , D C 2003 6 | Doin g disabilityjustk e
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 596
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 2 of 19 PAGEID #: 597
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 3 of 19 PAGEID #: 598
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 4 of 19 PAGEID #: 599
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 5 of 19 PAGEID #: 600
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 6 of 19 PAGEID #: 601
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 7 of 19 PAGEID #: 602
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 8 of 19 PAGEID #: 603
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 9 of 19 PAGEID #: 604
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 10 of 19 PAGEID #: 605
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 11 of 19 PAGEID #: 606
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 12 of 19 PAGEID #: 607
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 13 of 19 PAGEID #: 608
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 14 of 19 PAGEID #: 609
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 15 of 19 PAGEID #: 610
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 16 of 19 PAGEID #: 611
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 17 of 19 PAGEID #: 612
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 18 of 19 PAGEID #: 613
Case: 2:17-cv-00713-EAS-EPD Doc #: 81-1 Filed: 10/31/17 Page: 19 of 19 PAGEID #: 614
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annualreport of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Linda Baddour, ChiefFinancial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;and 

 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

 

Date: February 18, 2003
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Subjex Corporation
        does
        hereby certify that:
 
 (a)
        the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Subjex Corporation for the month ended
        September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (b)
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of Subjex
        Corporation
 
 Date:
                  November 12, 2007
              By:
              /s/  Andrew
                  D. HyderAndrew
                  D. HyderPresident
                  & Chief Executive Officer
  
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 06 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(SUBSECTION
        (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
        CODE)**
 
 Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        Section 1350 , chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
        undersigned officers of Subjex Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the
        "Company"), does certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company
        on
        Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that: (1) the 10-QSB
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
        10-QSB
        Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition
        and
        results of the Company.
 
 
 By  /s/
                  Andrew HyderAndrew
                  Hyder, CEO (acting CFO)November
                  12, 2007
exmo_ex104.htm


Exhibit 10.4

MUTUAL AGREEMENT 

 









THIS MUTUAL AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) dated December 1, 2008  is by and between David Bychkov (“Bychkov”), Cheyenne Crow (“Crow”) and Robert Doornick (“Doornick”, Doornick, Bychkov and Crow are each a “Party” and collectively referred to as “Parties”).  This Agreement will be effective upon completion of the Purchase as hereinafter defined (the “Effective Date”).







WHEREAS, Bychkov owns directly or indirectly through his companies, Exmocare, LLC, Exmovere LLC and Exmogate LLC (collectively, the “Exmocare Companies”) certain intellectual property (the “Intellectual Property”);







WHEREAS, Crow agreed to contribute to test and develop the Intellectual Property in partnership with government agencies, in return for $1.5 Million per year in equity (such amount due being referred to as the “Obligation to Crow”), should the Intellectual Property ever be purchased by a public company;







WHEREAS Crow has performed his part of the bargain and either acted as a consultant to or has been employed by one of the Exmocare Companies since January 2004;







WHEREAS, Robert Doornick agreed to contribute to the design and development of the Intellectual Property, in return for earning $150,000 per year in equity (such amount due being referred to as the “Obligation to Doornick”, the Obligation to Doornick along with the Obligation to Crow shall be collectively known as the “Obligations) should the Intellectual Property ever be owned by a public company;







WHEREAS, Robert Doornick has performed his part of the bargain and made a substantial contribution to the development and/or marketing of the Intellectual Property since 2004;







WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the Intellectual Property would be better utilized if owned by a public company and the Parties along with others are seeking a method to go public;







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as set forth below.







If any publicly owned company (the “Company”) purchases the Intellectual Property (the “Purchase”) whether owned by Bychkov and/or the Exmocare Companies in exchange for shares in the Company;








	
    ·      

	
Simultaneously with such Purchase, Bychkov shall distribute a portion of the shares that he receives in exchange for the Purchase to Crow in an amount sufficient to satisfy the Obligation to Crow to be calculated in a reasonable and mutually agreed manner on the date of the Purchase.













	
    ·      

	
Simultaneously with such Purchase, Bychkov shall distribute a portion of the shares that he receives in exchange for the Purchase to Doornick in an amount sufficient to satisfy the Obligation to Doornick to be calculated in a reasonable and mutually agreed manner on the date of the Purchase.







 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written, which Agreement may be signed in one or more counterparts, each of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4284 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2009 

Received 

AN ACT 

To extend the Generalized System of Preferences and the 

Andean Trade Preference Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4284 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF 

2 PREFERENCES. 

3 Section 505 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

4 2465) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ANDEAN TRADE PREFERENCE ACT. 

7 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 208(a) of the Andean 

8 Trade Preference Act (19 U.S.C. 3206(a)) is amended in 

9 paragraphs (1) and (2) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ 

10 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2010’’. 

11 (b) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN APPAREL ARTICLES.— 

12 Section 204(b)(3) of the Andean Trade Preference Act 

13 (19 U.S.C. 3203(b)(3)) is amended— 

14 (1) in subparagraph (B)— 

15 (A) in clause (iii)— 

16 (i) in subclause (II), by striking ‘‘7 

17 succeeding 1-year periods’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘8 succeeding 1-year periods’’; and 

19 (ii) in subclause (III)(bb), by striking 

20 ‘‘and for the succeeding 2-year period’’ and 

21 inserting ‘‘and for the succeeding 3-year 

22 period’’; and 

23 (B) in clause (v)(II), by striking ‘‘6 suc24 ceeding 1-year periods’’ and inserting ‘‘7 suc25 ceeding 1-year periods’’; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4284 RDS 

1 (2) in subparagraph (E)(ii)(II), by striking 

2 ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

3 2010’’. 

4 (c) REPORT.—Section 203(f)(1) of the Andean Trade 

5 Preference Act (19 U.S.C. 3202(f)(1)) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘April 30, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2010’’. 

7 SEC. 3. CUSTOMS USER FEES. 

8 Section 13031(j)(3) of the Consolidated Omnibus 

9 Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)) 

10 is amended— 

11 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘February 

12 14, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘May 14, 2018’’; and 

13 (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ‘‘Feb14 ruary 7, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘June 7, 2018’’. 

15 SEC. 4. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED 

16 TAXES. 

17 The percentage under paragraph (1) of section 

18 202(b) of the Corporate Estimated Tax Shift Act of 2009 

19 in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act is in20 creased by 1.5 percentage points. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
exv10w2wa






Exhibit 10.2(a)




ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC.




FIRST AMENDMENT TO



CARL RUBIN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



     WHEREAS, Ulta, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) executed an
Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Mr. Carl Rubin (the “Executive”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive mutually desire to amend the Agreement to change the date
on which Executive’s employment will commence:



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and premises set forth herein, and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby jointly acknowledged,
the Company and the Executive hereby amend the Agreement effective as of April 12, 2010 to change
the Commencement Date under Sections 1 and 2 to May 10, 2010.



     In all other regards the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this First Amendment as of the day and
year written below.



	 	 	 	 	 
	COMPANY: 	 	Date: 04/28/2010 
	

ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & 
FRAGRANCE, INC.

 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ Dennis K. Eck
 	 	 
	 	Title: Director 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	EXECUTIVE: 
 	 	Date: 04/27/2010
	/s/ Carl Rubin
 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 



[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO




CARL RUBIN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT]