##### Table of Contents





UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





Form 10-Q





QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2012

Commission file number: 000-30586







LOGO

Ivanhoe Energy Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)







|                                |  |                    
|------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|Yukon, Canada                   |  | 98-0372413         
|(State or other jurisdiction of |  | (IRS Employer      
|incorporation or organization)  |  | Identification No.)

654-999 Canada Place

Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3E1

(604) 688-8323

(Address and telephone number of the registrants principal executive offices)





Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes      ̈  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).     ̈Yes     ̈  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



|                        |  |   |  |                           |  |  
|----------------------- |  | - |  | ------------------------- |  | -
|Large accelerated filer |  |  ̈ |  | Accelerated filer         |  | x
|                        |  |   | 
|Non-accelerated filer   |  |  ̈ |  | Smaller reporting company |  |  ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).     ̈  Yes    x  No

As at July 31, 2012, Ivanhoe Energy Inc. had 344,139,428 Common Shares outstanding with no par value.









---

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|                                                                                              |  |  |    | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | -- | 
|                                                                                              | 
|PART I                                                                                        |  |  |    | 
|ITEM 1: Financial Statements                                                                  |  |  |    | 
|Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position                             |  |  | 3  | 
|Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss                    |  |  | 4  | 
|Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity                              |  |  | 5  | 
|Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                                     |  |  | 6  | 
|Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements                            |  |  | 7  | 
|ITEM 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |  |  | 20 | 
|ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                            |  |  | 28 | 
|ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures                                                               |  |  | 28 | 
|                                                                                              | 
|PART II                                                                                       |  |  |    | 
|ITEM 1: Legal Proceedings                                                                     |  |  | 29 | 
|ITEM 1A: Risk Factors                                                                         |  |  | 29 | 
|ITEM 6: Exhibits                                                                              |  |  | 30 | 



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

IVANHOE ENERGY INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position

(Unaudited)



|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- |  | ------------ |  | -------- | ---------------- |  |  | -------- | -
|(US$000s)                                |  | Note |       |  | June 30,2012 |  |          | December 31,2011 | 
|Assets                                   |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|Current Assets                           |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                |  |      | 3     |  |              |  | 27,416   |                  |  |  | 16,890   |  
|Restricted cash                          |  |      | 4     |  |              |  | 20,500   |                  |  |  | 20,500   |  
|Accounts receivable                      |  |      |       |  |              |  | 5,377    |                  |  |  | 7,859    |  
|Note receivable                          |  |      |       |  |              |  | 225      |                  |  |  | 227      |  
|Prepaid and other                        |  |      |       |  |              |  | 1,282    |                  |  |  | 1,411    |  
|Assets held for sale                     |  |      | 5     |  |              |  | 52,660   |                  |  |  | 41,902   |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  | 107,460  |                  |  |  | 88,789   |  
|                                         |  |      |      
|Intangible                               |  |      | 6     |  |              |  | 295,723  |                  |  |  | 273,986  |  
|Property, plant and equipment            |  |      | 7     |  |              |  | 49,002   |                  |  |  | 46,979   |  
|Long term receivables                    |  |      |       |  |              |  | 5,295    |                  |  |  | 3,956    |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  | 457,480  |                  |  |  | 413,710  |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|Liabilities and Shareholders Equity     |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|Current Liabilities                      |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  |      |       |  |              |  | 34,181   |                  |  |  | 15,548   |  
|Debt                                     |  |      | 8     |  |              |  | 38,348   |                  |  |  |         |  
|Derivative instruments                   |  |      | 9     |  |              |  |         |                  |  |  | 183      |  
|Income taxes                             |  |      |       |  |              |  | 947      |                  |  |  | 641      |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  | 73,476   |                  |  |  | 16,372   |  
|                                         |  |      |      
|Long term debt                           |  |      | 8     |  |              |  | 62,235   |                  |  |  | 61,892   |  
|Long term derivative instruments         |  |      | 9, 10 |  |              |  | 60       |                  |  |  | 1,617    |  
|Long term provisions                     |  |      |       |  |              |  | 2,727    |                  |  |  | 1,919    |  
|Deferred income taxes                    |  |      |       |  |              |  | 18,041   |                  |  |  | 17,773   |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  | 156,539  |                  |  |  | 99,573   |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|Shareholders Equity                     |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|Share capital                            |  |      | 12    |  |              |  | 586,108  |                  |  |  | 586,108  |  
|Contributed surplus                      |  |      | 13    |  |              |  | 28,693   |                  |  |  | 26,524   |  
|Accumulated deficit                      |  |      |       |  |              |  | (313,860 | )                |  |  | (298,495 | )
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  | 300,941  |                  |  |  | 314,137  |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  | 457,480  |                  |  |  | 413,710  |  
|                                         |  |      |       |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  
|Nature of operations and going concern   |  |      | 1     |  |              |  |          |                  |  |  |          |  

(See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)



3



---

##### Table of Contents

IVANHOE ENERGY INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited)



|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | -- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------- | ------------------------- |  |  | ------- | - |  | ---- | ------- | - |  |  | ------- | -
|                                              |  |      |    |  | Three Months Ended
June 30, |  |         | Six Months Ended
June 30, | 
|(US$000s, except share and per share amounts) |  | Note |    |  | 2012                        |  |         | 2011                      |  |  | 2012    |   |  | 2011 |        
|Revenue                                       |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Oil                                           |  |      |    |  |                             |  | 11,292  |                           |  |  | 9,389   |   |  |      | 19,200  |   |  |  | 17,508  |  
|Interest                                      |  |      |    |  |                             |  | 5       |                           |  |  | 143     |   |  |      | 11      |   |  |  | 210     |  
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  | 11,297  |                           |  |  | 9,532   |   |  |      | 19,211  |   |  |  | 17,718  |  
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Expenses and other                            |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Operating                                     |  |      | 15 |  |                             |  | 4,846   |                           |  |  | 5,339   |   |  |      | 9,494   |   |  |  | 9,862   |  
|Exploration and evaluation                    |  |      | 6  |  |                             |  | 152     |                           |  |  |        |   |  |      | 152     |   |  |  |        |  
|General and administrative                    |  |      |    |  |                             |  | 10,400  |                           |  |  | 11,744  |   |  |      | 20,887  |   |  |  | 25,161  |  
|Depletion and depreciation                    |  |      | 7  |  |                             |  | 2,401   |                           |  |  | 1,891   |   |  |      | 4,237   |   |  |  | 3,722   |  
|Foreign currency exchange gain                |  |      |    |  |                             |  | (1,760  | )                         |  |  | (238    | ) |  |      | (794    | ) |  |  | (463    | )
|Derivative instruments gain                   |  |      | 9  |  |                             |  | (1,262  | )                         |  |  | (6,071  | ) |  |      | (1,732  | ) |  |  | (7,200  | )
|Finance                                       |  |      |    |  |                             |  | 470     |                           |  |  | 359     |   |  |      | 586     |   |  |  | 367     |  
|Other expenses                                |  |      | 8  |  |                             |  |        |                           |  |  |        |   |  |      | 309     |   |  |  |        |  
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  | 15,247  |                           |  |  | 13,024  |   |  |      | 33,139  |   |  |  | 31,449  |  
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Loss before income taxes                      |  |      |    |  |                             |  | (3,950  | )                         |  |  | (3,492  | ) |  |      | (13,928 | ) |  |  | (13,731 | )
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                            
|Recovery of (provision for) income taxes      |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Current                                       |  |      |    |  |                             |  | (821    | )                         |  |  | (477    | ) |  |      | (1,169  | ) |  |  | (799    | )
|Deferred                                      |  |      |    |  |                             |  | 68      |                           |  |  | (142    | ) |  |      | (268    | ) |  |  | (707    | )
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  | (753    | )                         |  |  | (619    | ) |  |      | (1,437  | ) |  |  | (1,506  | )
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Net loss and comprehensive loss               |  |      |    |  |                             |  | (4,703  | )                         |  |  | (4,111  | ) |  |      | (15,365 | ) |  |  | (15,237 | )
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Net loss per common share, basic and diluted  |  |      |    |  |                             |  | (0.01   | )                         |  |  | (0.01   | ) |  |      | (0.04   | ) |  |  | (0.04   | )
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Weighted average number of common shares      |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Basic and diluted (000s)                      |  |      |    |  |                             |  | 344,139 |                           |  |  | 338,432 |   |  |      | 344,139 |   |  |  | 341,197 |  
|                                              |  |      |    |  |                             |  |         |                           |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  

(See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)



4



---

##### Table of Contents

IVANHOE ENERGY INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)



|                                             |  |      |    |  |               |  |         |        |  |  |                    |  |  |                    |        |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | -- |  | ------------- |  | ------- | ------ |  |  | ------------------ |  |  | ------------------ | ------ | - | ----- |  | -------- | - |  |  | ------- | -
|                                             |  |      |    |  | Share Capital |  |         |        |  |  |                    |  |  |                    |       
|(US$000s, except share amounts)              |  | Note |    |  | Shares(000s)  |  |         | Amount |  |  | ContributedSurplus |  |  | AccumulatedDeficit |        |   | Total | 
|Balance January 1, 2011                      |  |      |    |  |               |  | 334,365 |        |  |  | 550,562            |  |  |                    | 23,141 |   |       |  | (273,219 | ) |  |  | 300,484 |  
|Net loss and comprehensive loss              |  |      |    |  |               |  |        |        |  |  |                   |  |  |                    |       |   |       |  | (15,237  | ) |  |  | (15,237 | )
|Exercise of stock options                    |  |      |    |  |               |  | 984     |        |  |  | 4,164              |  |  |                    | (2,231 | ) |       |  |         |   |  |  | 1,933   |  
|Exercise of purchase warrants                |  |      |    |  |               |  | 8,621   |        |  |  | 31,047             |  |  |                    |       |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 31,047  |  
|Share-based compensation expense             |  |      | 13 |  |               |  |        |        |  |  |                   |  |  |                    | 3,235  |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 3,235   |  
|                                             |  |      |    |  |               |  |         |        |  |  |                    |  |  |                    |        |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|Balance June 30, 2011                        |  |      |    |  |               |  | 343,970 |        |  |  | 585,773            |  |  |                    | 24,145 |   |       |  | (288,456 | ) |  |  | 321,462 |  
|                                             |  |      |    |  |               |  |         |        |  |  |                    |  |  |                    |        |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|                                             |  |      |    |  |              
|                                             |  |      |    |  | Share Capital |  |         |        |  |  |                    |  |  |                    |       
|(US$000s, except share amounts)              |  | Note |    |  | Shares(000s)  |  |         | Amount |  |  | ContributedSurplus |  |  | AccumulatedDeficit |        |   | Total | 
|Balance January 1, 2012                      |  |      |    |  |               |  | 344,139 |        |  |  | 586,108            |  |  |                    | 26,524 |   |       |  | (298,495 | ) |  |  | 314,137 |  
|Net loss and comprehensive loss              |  |      |    |  |               |  |         |        |  |  |                    |  |  |                    |       |   |       |  | (15,365  | ) |  |  | (15,365 | )
|Funding of equity-settled share-based awards |  |      |    |  |               |  |        |        |  |  |                   |  |  |                    | (54    | ) |       |  |         |   |  |  | (54     | )
|Share-based compensation expense             |  |      | 13 |  |               |  |        |        |  |  |                   |  |  |                    | 2,223  |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 2,223   |  
|                                             |  |      |    |  |               |  |         |        |  |  |                    |  |  |                    |        |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|Balance June 30, 2012                        |  |      |    |  |               |  | 344,139 |        |  |  | 586,108            |  |  |                    | 28,693 |   |       |  | (313,860 | ) |  |  | 300,941 |  
|                                             |  |      |    |  |               |  |         |        |  |  |                    |  |  |                    |        |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  

(See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements)



5



---

##### Table of Contents

IVANHOE ENERGY INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)



|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | -- |  | -------------------------- |  | ------- | ------------------------ |  |  | ------- | - |  | ---- | ------- | - |  |  | ------- | -
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  | Three Months EndedJune 30, |  |         | Six Months EndedJune 30, | 
|(US$000s)                                                                     |  | Note |    |  | 2012                       |  |         | 2011                     |  |  | 2012    |   |  | 2011 |        
|Operating Activities                                                          |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Net loss                                                                      |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (4,703  | )                        |  |  | (4,111  | ) |  |      | (15,365 | ) |  |  | (15,237 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash from operating activities           |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Depletion and depreciation                                                    |  |      | 7  |  |                            |  | 2,401   |                          |  |  | 1,891   |   |  |      | 4,237   |   |  |  | 3,722   |  
|Exploration and evaluation expense                                            |  |      | 6  |  |                            |  | 152     |                          |  |  |        |   |  |      | 152     |   |  |  |        |  
|Share-based compensation expense                                              |  |      | 13 |  |                            |  | 1,003   |                          |  |  | 1,471   |   |  |      | 2,239   |   |  |  | 3,247   |  
|Unrealized foreign currency exchange loss (gain)                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (1,669  | )                        |  |  | (1,553  | ) |  |      | (620    | ) |  |  | (1,780  | )
|Unrealized derivative instruments gain                                        |  |      | 9  |  |                            |  | (1,262  | )                        |  |  | (6,071  | ) |  |      | (1,732  | ) |  |  | (7,200  | )
|Current income tax expense                                                    |  |      |    |  |                            |  | 821     |                          |  |  | 477     |   |  |      | 1,169   |   |  |  | 799     |  
|Deferred income tax expense                                                   |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (68     | )                        |  |  | 142     |   |  |      | 268     |   |  |  | 707     |  
|Finance expense                                                               |  |      |    |  |                            |  | 470     |                          |  |  | 359     |   |  |      | 586     |   |  |  | 367     |  
|Finance costs                                                                 |  |      |    |  |                            |  |        |                          |  |  | 269     |   |  |      |        |   |  |  | 269     |  
|Other expenses                                                                |  |      | 8  |  |                            |  |        |                          |  |  |        |   |  |      | 309     |   |  |  |        |  
|Other                                                                         |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (2      | )                        |  |  | (106    | ) |  |      | (1      | ) |  |  | (12     | )
|Current income tax paid                                                       |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (381    | )                        |  |  | (267    | ) |  |      | (864    | ) |  |  | (324    | )
|Interest paid                                                                 |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (302    | )                        |  |  |        |   |  |      | (302    | ) |  |  |        |  
|Share-based payments                                                          |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (110    | )                        |  |  |        |   |  |      | (166    | ) |  |  |        |  
|Changes in non-cash working capital items                                     |  |      | 16 |  |                            |  | (534    | )                        |  |  | 1,044   |   |  |      | (986    | ) |  |  | 1,978   |  
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Net cash used in operating activities                                         |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (4,184  | )                        |  |  | (6,455  | ) |  |      | (11,076 | ) |  |  | (13,464 | )
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Investing Activities                                                          |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Intangible expenditures                                                       |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (19,509 | )                        |  |  | (13,906 | ) |  |      | (28,050 | ) |  |  | (23,772 | )
|Property, plant and equipment expenditures                                    |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (5,110  | )                        |  |  | (3,514  | ) |  |      | (5,494  | ) |  |  | (7,463  | )
|Long term receivables                                                         |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (964    | )                        |  |  | (316    | ) |  |      | (1,338  | ) |  |  | (463    | )
|Interest paid                                                                 |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (2,553  | )                        |  |  | 15      |   |  |      | (2,553  | ) |  |  | (1,003  | )
|Changes in non-cash working capital items                                     |  |      | 16 |  |                            |  | 17,538  |                          |  |  | 1,082   |   |  |      | 21,673  |   |  |  | 4,578   |  
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                         |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (10,598 | )                        |  |  | (16,639 | ) |  |      | (15,762 | ) |  |  | (28,123 | )
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Financing Activities                                                          |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Debt proceeds, net of transaction costs                                       |  |      | 8  |  |                            |  |        |                          |  |  | 72,914  |   |  |      | 37,282  |   |  |  | 72,914  |  
|Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants                                |  |      |    |  |                            |  |        |                          |  |  | 59      |   |  |      |        |   |  |  | 29,873  |  
|Changes in non-cash working capital items                                     |  |      | 16 |  |                            |  |        |                          |  |  | (28     | ) |  |      |        |   |  |  | (47     | )
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Net cash provided by financing activities                                     |  |      |    |  |                            |  |        |                          |  |  | 72,945  |   |  |      | 37,282  |   |  |  | 102,740 |  
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Foreign exchange gain on cash and cash equivalents held in a foreign currency |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (62     | )                        |  |  | 2,659   |   |  |      | 82      |   |  |  | 3,838   |  
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents, for the period              |  |      |    |  |                            |  | (14,844 | )                        |  |  | 52,510  |   |  |      | 10,526  |   |  |  | 64,991  |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period                                |  |      |    |  |                            |  | 42,260  |                          |  |  | 80,798  |   |  |      | 16,890  |   |  |  | 68,317  |  
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of period                                      |  |      |    |  |                            |  | 27,416  |                          |  |  | 133,308 |   |  |      | 27,416  |   |  |  | 133,308 |  
|                                                                              |  |      |    |  |                            |  |         |                          |  |  |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |  |         |  

(See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)



6



---

##### Table of Contents

IVANHOE ENERGY INC.

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(tabular amounts in US$000s, except share and per share amounts)

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND GOING CONCERN

Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the Company or
Ivanhoe) is a publicly listed company incorporated in Canada, with limited liability under the legislation of the Yukon. Ivanhoes common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and the NASDAQ Stock Market
(NASDAQ). The head office and principal address of the Company are located at 999 Canada Place, Suite 654, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 3E1. The registered and records office of the Company is located at 300-204 Black Street,
Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada, Y1A 2M9.

Ivanhoe is an independent international heavy oil development and production company focused on pursuing
long term growth in its reserves and production. Ivanhoe plans to utilize advanced technologies, such as its HTL technology, that are designed to improve recovery of heavy oil resources. In addition, the Company seeks to expand its reserve
base and production through conventional exploration and production of oil and gas.

The June 30, 2012 unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements (Financial Statements) have been prepared using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), applicable to a going
concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they become due and assumes that Ivanhoe will be able to meet its obligations and continue operations for at least its next
fiscal year. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these Financial Statements do not give effect to adjustments that may be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities
should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Such adjustments could be material.

At June 30, 2012, Ivanhoe had an
accumulated deficit of $313.9 million and working capital deficit of $18.7 million, excluding assets held for sale. In the six months ended June 30, 2012, cash used in operating activities was $11.1 million and the Company expects to incur
further losses in the development of its business. Continuing as a going concern is dependent upon attaining future profitable operations to repay liabilities arising in the normal course of operations and accessing additional capital to develop the
Companys properties. Ivanhoe intends to finance its future funding requirements through a combination of strategic investors and/or public and private debt and equity markets, either at a parent company level or at the project level, and
through the sale of interests in existing oil and gas properties. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such financing, or obtain it on favorable terms. Without access to additional financing or other cash generating
activities in 2012, there is material uncertainty that casts substantial doubt that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern.

The June 30, 2012 Financial Statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorized for issue on July 27, 2012.

The Financial Statements are presented in US dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand dollars except where otherwise indicated.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

2.1 Statement of Compliance

The
Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting (IAS 34), using accounting policies consistent with IFRS as issued by the IASB. The Financial Statements are not subject to
qualification relating to the application of IFRS as issued by the IASB.

The Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the
Companys annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 prepared in accordance with IFRS. The same accounting policies, presentation and methods of computation have been followed in these Financial Statements as were
applied in the Companys first annual IFRS consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011.

2.2 Basis of
Presentation

The Financial Statements have been prepared on an historical cost basis, except derivative instruments, which are measured at
fair value.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

2.3 Standards and Interpretations Issued But Not Yet Adopted

The Company has reviewed new and revised accounting pronouncements listed below, that have been issued, but are not yet effective. The Company has not yet
evaluated the impact of these changes on its financial statements.

i. IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (IFRS 9)

IFRS 9 was issued in November 2009 and is intended to replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (IAS 39)
in phases. IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value, as opposed to the multiple rules in IAS 39. The approach is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments given
its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. The standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for reporting
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015.

ii. IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (IFRS 10)

IFRS 10 was issued in May 2011 and sets a single basis for consolidation, that being control of an entity. IFRS 10 replaces portions of IAS 27,
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and Standing Interpretations Committee 12, Special Purpose Entities that provide a single model on how entities should prepare consolidated financial statements. This standard is
effective for reporting periods on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier adoption permitted.

iii. IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements
(IFRS 11)

IFRS 11, issued in May 2011, establishes principles for financial reporting by entities involved in a joint
arrangement and distinguishes between joint operations and joint ventures. IFRS 11 supersedes the current IAS 31, Interests in Joint Ventures and Standing Interpretations Committee 13, Jointly Controlled Entities-Non Monetary
Contributions by Venturers and is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier adoption permitted.

iv. IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (IFRS 12)

IFRS 12,
issued in May 2011, establishes a single set of disclosure objectives, and requires minimum disclosures designed to meet those objectives, regarding interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates or unconsolidated structured entities.
IFRS 12 is intended to combine the disclosure requirements on interests in other entities currently located throughout different standards. This standard is effective for reporting periods on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier adoption
permitted.

v. IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurements (IFRS 13)

IFRS 13, issued in May 2011, defines fair value, sets out a single IFRS framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. IFRS 13 applies to IFRS that require or
permit fair value measurements or related disclosures, except in specified circumstances. IFRS 13 is to be applied for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier adoption permitted.

vi. IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (IAS 28)

IAS 28 was amended in 2011 and prescribes the accounting for investments in associates and sets out the requirements for the application of the equity method when accounting for investments in associates
and joint ventures. IAS 28 is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier adoption permitted.

There are no other standards or interpretations issued, but not yet adopted, that are anticipated to have a material effect on the reported loss or net
assets of the Company.

3. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS



|                          |  |              |        |  |                  |  |        | 
|------------------------- |  | ------------ | ------ |  | ---------------- |  | ------ | 
|                          |  | June 30,2012 |        |  | December 31,2011 | 
|Cash at banks and on hand |  |              | 27,416 |  |                  |  | 16,867 | 
|Restricted cash           |  |              |       |  |                  |  | 23     | 
|                          |  |              |        |  |                  |  |        | 
|                          |  |              | 27,416 |  |                  |  | 16,890 | 
|                          |  |              |        |  |                  |  |        | 



8



---

##### Table of Contents

4. RESTRICTED CASH



|                         |  |              |        |  |                  |  |        | 
|------------------------ |  | ------------ | ------ |  | ---------------- |  | ------ | 
|                         |  | June 30,2012 |        |  | December 31,2011 | 
|Ecuador performance bond |  |              | 500    |  |                  |  | 500    | 
|Zitong performance bond  |  |              | 20,000 |  |                  |  | 20,000 | 
|                         |  |              |        |  |                  |  |        | 
|                         |  |              | 20,500 |  |                  |  | 20,500 | 
|                         |  |              |        |  |                  |  |        | 

In December 2011, Ivanhoe was required to post a $20.0 million performance bond as part of the completion and signing of
a supplementary agreement to the Contract for Exploration, Development and Production in Zitong Block, Sichaun Basin with China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) for the Zitong block.

5. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Sunwing Zitong
Energy (SZE), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a binding Memorandum of Understanding to assign 100% of its participating interest in the Zitong Production Sharing Contract (PSC) to Shell China Exploration and
Production Company Limited (Shell). The transaction is subject to government approvals and other prescribed conditions. There is no assurance that this transaction will close on the terms presently contemplated or at all.

In exchange for SZEs interest in the Zitong block, Ivanhoe will receive a cash payment of up to $85.0 million as reimbursement for past qualified
and recoverable costs incurred. In addition, Ivanhoe will receive a further cash payment contingent on the timing of the receipt of full government approvals and third-party consents and waivers for the transaction. If the transaction closes after
June 30, 2012, but on or before September 30, 2012, the Company will receive an additional $50.0 million. If the transaction closes after September 30, 2012, but on or before December 31, 2012, the Company will receive an
additional $20.0 million. Failure to reach completion of the transaction prior to December 31, 2012 will give either party the right to terminate the transaction.

Should SZE receive government approval for the transaction, Shell will become liable for the performance bond posted in 2011, resulting in a release of restricted cash back to the Company.

The carrying value of the Zitong asset, which is comprised of exploration and evaluation (E&E) expenditures, was $52.7 million at
June 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011  $41.9 million); the property was previously reported in the Asia segment.

6. INTANGIBLE
ASSETS



|                                     |  |                                   |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |        |   |  |                |         |   |                        |  |        |  |  |  |         |  
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------- | ------- | - | ------ |  | ------- | ------------ |  |  | ------ | - |  | -------------- | ------- | - | ---------------------- |  | ------ |  |  |  | ------- | -
|                                     |  | Exploration and Evaluation Assets |         |   |        |  |         |              | 
|                                     |  | Asia                              |         |   | Canada |  |         | LatinAmerica |  |  | Total  |   |  | HTLTechnology |         |   | Total IntangibleAssets | 
|Cost                                 |  |                                   |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |        |   |  |                |         |   |                        |  |        |  |  |  |         |  
|Balance January 1, 2011              |  |                                   | 38,135  |   |        |  | 123,755 |              |  |  | 19,525 |   |  |                | 181,415 |   |                        |  | 92,153 |  |  |  | 273,568 |  
|Additions                            |  |                                   | 23,094  |   |        |  | 9,697   |              |  |  | 12,303 |   |  |                | 45,094  |   |                        |  |       |  |  |  | 45,094  |  
|Exploration and evaluation expense   |  |                                   | (2,124  | ) |        |  |        |              |  |  | (650   | ) |  |                | (2,774  | ) |                        |  |       |  |  |  | (2,774  | )
|Assets reclassified as held for sale |  |                                   | (41,902 | ) |        |  |        |              |  |  |       |   |  |                | (41,902 | ) |                        |  |       |  |  |  | (41,902 | )
|                                     |  |                                   |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |        |   |  |                |         |   |                        |  |        |  |  |  |         |  
|Balance December 31, 2011            |  |                                   | 17,203  |   |        |  | 133,452 |              |  |  | 31,178 |   |  |                | 181,833 |   |                        |  | 92,153 |  |  |  | 273,986 |  
|Additions                            |  |                                   | 229     |   |        |  | 4,877   |              |  |  | 16,783 |   |  |                | 21,889  |   |                        |  |       |  |  |  | 21,889  |  
|Exploration and evaluation expense   |  |                                   |        |   |        |  | (152    | )            |  |  |       |   |  |                | (152    | ) |                        |  |       |  |  |  | (152    | )
|                                     |  |                                   |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |        |   |  |                |         |   |                        |  |        |  |  |  |         |  
|Balance June 30, 2012                |  |                                   | 17,432  |   |        |  | 138,177 |              |  |  | 47,961 |   |  |                | 203,570 |   |                        |  | 92,153 |  |  |  | 295,723 |  
|                                     |  |                                   |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |        |   |  |                |         |   |                        |  |        |  |  |  |         |  

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, $0.9 million (year ended December 31, 2011  $2.1 million) of
employee benefits directly attributable to E&E assets were capitalized. In addition, in the six months ended June 30, 2012, nil (year ended December 31, 2011  $0.3 million) related to share-based compensation costs were
capitalized to E&E assets.

Amortization of the HTL technology has not commenced and its carrying value had not been impaired since
it was acquired in 2005.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

7. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT



|                                       |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | ------ |  | ----------- |  | - | ------------ |  |  | ----- |  |  |  | ------ |  |  |  | ------ | - |  |  | ------ | -
|                                       |  | Oil and Gas Property and Equipment |        |  | OtherAssets |  |   | TotalPP&E    | 
|                                       |  | Asia                               |        |  | Canada      |  |   | LatinAmerica |  |  | Total |  |  | 
|Cost                                   |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Balance January 1, 2011                |  |                                    | 35,939 |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 35,939 |  |  |  | 13,009 |   |  |  | 48,948 |  
|Additions                              |  |                                    | 12,923 |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 12,923 |  |  |  | 1,471  |   |  |  | 14,394 |  
|Disposals                              |  |                                    |       |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  |       |  |  |  | (3     | ) |  |  | (3     | )
|                                       |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Balance December 31, 2011              |  |                                    | 48,862 |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 48,862 |  |  |  | 14,477 |   |  |  | 63,339 |  
|Additions                              |  |                                    | 6,144  |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 6,144  |  |  |  | 116    |   |  |  | 6,260  |  
|                                       |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Balance June 30, 2012                  |  |                                    | 55,006 |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 55,006 |  |  |  | 14,593 |   |  |  | 69,599 |  
|                                       |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Accumulated Depletion and Depreciation |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Balance January 1, 2011                |  |                                    | 6,196  |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 6,196  |  |  |  | 2,134  |   |  |  | 8,330  |  
|Depletion and depreciation             |  |                                    | 6,899  |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 6,899  |  |  |  | 1,132  |   |  |  | 8,031  |  
|Disposals                              |  |                                    |       |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  |       |  |  |  | (1     | ) |  |  | (1     | )
|                                       |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Balance December 31, 2011              |  |                                    | 13,095 |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 13,095 |  |  |  | 3,265  |   |  |  | 16,360 |  
|Depletion and depreciation             |  |                                    | 3,676  |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 3,676  |  |  |  | 561    |   |  |  | 4,237  |  
|                                       |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Balance June 30, 2012                  |  |                                    | 16,771 |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 16,771 |  |  |  | 3,826  |   |  |  | 20,597 |  
|                                       |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Net Book Value                         |  |                                    |        |  |             |  |   |              |  |  |       |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|As at December 31, 2011                |  |                                    | 35,767 |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 35,767 |  |  |  | 11,212 |   |  |  | 46,979 |  
|As at June 30, 2012                    |  |                                    | 38,235 |  |             |  |  |              |  |  |      |  |  |  | 38,235 |  |  |  | 10,767 |   |  |  | 49,002 |  

Oil and Gas Property and Equipment

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, $0.1 million (year ended December 31, 2011  $0.1 million) of employee benefits directly attributable to property, plant and equipment
(PP&E) were capitalized.

Other Assets

Other assets include the Companys Feedstock Test Facility (FTF) at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, and general furniture and fixtures.

Security

Should Ivanhoe receive
government and other approvals necessary to develop the northern border of one of the Companys oil sands leases in the Athabasca region of Canada (Tamarack), the Company will make a cash payment to Talisman Energy Canada
(Talisman) of up to Cdn$15.0 million, as a contingent, final payment for the 2008 acquisition of the oil sands leases (Note 11). The contingent payment is secured by a first fixed charge and security interest in favor of Talisman,
including over the oil sands leases, and a general security interest in all of the Companys present and after acquired property, other than equity interests in the Companys subsidiaries (through which it holds assets in China, Mongolia
and Ecuador and the HTL technology). Talisman has agreed to subordinate its security interest in the Tamarack oil sands leases and related assets to UBS Securities LLC and certain of its affiliates (UBS) until the loan provided by
UBS to the Company through a credit agreement signed in March 2012 (Note 8) is repaid.

8. DEBT

Interest incurred for all outstanding debt was recorded as follows:



|                        |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----- | ---- |  |  | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                        |  | Three months endedJune 30, |       |  | Six months endedJune 30, | 
|                        |  | 2012                       |       |  | 2011                     |  |       | 2012 |  |  | 2011  | 
|Interest expense        |  |                            | 475   |  |                          |  | 352   |      |  |  | 572   |  |  |  | 352   | 
|Capitalized to E&E      |  |                            | 2,010 |  |                          |  | 677   |      |  |  | 3,723 |  |  |  | 1,374 | 
|Capitalized to PP&E     |  |                            | 463   |  |                          |  |      |      |  |  | 729   |  |  |  |      | 
|                        |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|Total interest incurred |  |                            | 2,948 |  |                          |  | 1,029 |      |  |  | 5,024 |  |  |  | 1,726 | 
|                        |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 



10



---

##### Table of Contents

8.1 Short Term Debt

In March 2012, the Company signed a credit agreement with UBS providing for a $50.0 million loan from UBS (UBS Loan). The UBS Loan includes an initial draw of $30.0 million and Ivanhoe may
elect to draw an additional $20.0 million of principal. Subsequent to quarter end, the Company elected to draw an additional $20.0 million of principal in July 2012. Borrowed amounts incur interest at a per annum rate equal to one month Libor plus
10% for the first six months of the UBS Loan which escalates by 1% per month thereafter; interest is payable monthly. The UBS Loan matures on March 23, 2013 and is secured by the Tamarack oil sands leases and related assets, and by a
charge over the shares of three of the Companys subsidiaries: Sunwing Holding Corporation, Sunwing Energy Ltd. and Sunwing Zitong Energy Ltd.

8.2 Convertible Short Term Debt

Ivanhoe entered into an unsecured loan agreement on
December 30, 2011 with Ivanhoe Capital Finance Ltd. (ICFL), a company wholly owned by Robert Friedland, for a $10.0 million loan (ICFL Loan). The funds were advanced to the Company on January 3, 2012. The
outstanding balance is subordinate in repayment to all amounts owing under the UBS Loan. Interest on the loan is 10% per annum, calculated monthly and due upon maturity.

On March 14, 2012, the ICFL Loan agreement was amended to provide that, at ICFLs option, the outstanding principal may be converted into 10,484,375 common shares of the Company, at a price of
Cdn$0.96 per common share, and the maturity date was extended to March 31, 2013. The debt component is carried at amortized cost and, on the date of amendment, the equity option was valued at nil using the residual method. The amendment was
treated as an extinguishment of the original loan with recognition of the amended loan resulting in the remaining deferred financing costs of $0.3 million being expensed in the first quarter of 2012.

8.3 Convertible Debentures

On
June 9, 2011, the Company issued Cdn$73.3 million in 5.75% convertible unsecured subordinated debentures at a price of Cdn$1,000 per debenture (Convertible Debentures). Cdn$50.0 million of the Convertible Debentures were issued in a
public offering. The remaining Cdn$23.3 million were issued in a private placement on the same terms as the public offering.

The Convertible
Debentures mature on June 30, 2016, pay interest semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 and are convertible at a price of Cdn$3.36 per share. They are redeemable after June 30, 2014 at Ivanhoes option with the redemption
price being settled using either cash or common shares.

The Canadian dollar denominated debt is considered an embedded derivative since the
functional currency of the Company is the US dollar and, as such, the option was bifurcated and recognized at fair value as a long term derivative liability (Note 10) with changes in value recorded each period in the statement of loss. The carrying
amount of the debt component of the Convertible Debentures at June 30, 2012 was $62.2 million (December 31, 2011  $61.9 million). The June 30, 2012 carrying value of the unamortized bifurcated derivative and transaction costs was
$9.2 million.

9. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

9.1 Fair Value of Financial Instruments Measured at Amortized Cost

Except as detailed
below, the fair value of the Companys financial instruments recognized at amortized cost approximates their carrying value due to the short term maturity of these instruments.



|                |  |              |        |  |                  |  |        | 
|--------------- |  | ------------ | ------ |  | ---------------- |  | ------ | 
|                |  | June 30,2012 |        |  | December 31,2011 | 
|Short Term Debt |  |              |        |  |                  |  |        | 
|Carrying amount |  |              | 38,348 |  |                  |  |       | 
|Fair value      |  |              | 39,340 |  |                  |  |       | 
|Long Term Debt  |  |              |        |  |                  |  |        | 
|Carrying amount |  |              | 62,235 |  |                  |  | 61,892 | 
|Fair value      |  |              | 49,323 |  |                  |  | 51,901 | 

The fair value of the liability component of the Convertible Debentures was estimated using the closing price of the
publicly traded debentures at June 30, 2012.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

9.2 Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value Through Profit and Loss

The Company classifies its financial instruments according to the fair value hierarchy outlined in IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures,
as described below:



| |     Level 1  | using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
| | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |     Level 2  | using inputs for the asset or liability, other than quoted prices, that are observable either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices).
| | -------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |     Level 3  | using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data, such as prices based on internal models or other valuation methods.
| | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table presents the Companys derivative instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss
(FVTPL):



|                                                        |  |                      |        |   |                             |  |        |                                 |  |  |                                       |   |  |                  |        |   |                |  |      |   |  |  |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------ | - | --------------------------- |  | ------ | ------------------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------- | - |  | ---------------- | ------ | - | -------------- |  | ---- | - |  |  | ------ | -
|                                                        |  | Level 1              |        |   | Level 2                     |  |        | Level 3                         |  |  |                                       |  
|                                                        |  | 2006PurchaseWarrants |        |   | 2009 & 2010PurchaseWarrants |  |        | 2008ConvertibleComponentof Debt |  |  | 2011ConvertibleComponentof Debentures |   |  | SubsidiaryOption |        |   | TotalFairValue | 
|Balance January 1, 2011                                 |  |                      | 5,615  |   |                             |  | 1,616  |                                 |  |  | 1,216                                 |   |  |                  |       |   |                |  |     |   |  |  | 8,447  |  
|Issuance of convertible debentures                      |  |                      |       |   |                             |  |       |                                 |  |  |                                      |   |  |                  | 9,852  |   |                |  |     |   |  |  | 9,852  |  
|Exercise of options                                     |  |                      | (2     | ) |                             |  | (3,107 | )                               |  |  |                                      |   |  |                  |       |   |                |  |     |   |  |  | (3,109 | )
|Derivative (gains) losses through profit and loss       |  |                      | (3,267 | ) |                             |  | 2,968  |                                 |  |  | (1,216                                | ) |  |                  | (7,810 | ) |                |  | 183  |   |  |  | (9,142 | )
|Expiration of purchase warrants through profit and loss |  |                      | (2,346 | ) |                             |  | (1,477 | )                               |  |  |                                      |   |  |                  |       |   |                |  |     |   |  |  | (3,823 | )
|Foreign exchange gains                                  |  |                      |       |   |                             |  |       |                                 |  |  |                                      |   |  |                  | (425   | ) |                |  |     |   |  |  | (425   | )
|                                                        |  |                      |        |   |                             |  |        |                                 |  |  |                                       |   |  |                  |        |   |                |  |      |   |  |  |        |  
|Balance December 31, 2011                               |  |                      |       |   |                             |  |       |                                 |  |  |                                      |   |  |                  | 1,617  |   |                |  | 183  |   |  |  | 1,800  |  
|Derivative gains through profit and loss                |  |                      |       |   |                             |  |       |                                 |  |  |                                      |   |  |                  | (1,549 | ) |                |  |     |   |  |  | (1,549 | )
|Expiration of derivatives through profit or loss        |  |                      |       |   |                             |  |       |                                 |  |  |                                      |   |  |                  |       |   |                |  | (183 | ) |  |  | (183   | )
|Foreign exchange gains                                  |  |                      |       |   |                             |  |       |                                 |  |  |                                      |   |  |                  | (8     | ) |                |  |     |   |  |  | (8     | )
|                                                        |  |                      |        |   |                             |  |        |                                 |  |  |                                       |   |  |                  |        |   |                |  |      |   |  |  |        |  
|Balance June 30, 2012                                   |  |                      |       |   |                             |  |       |                                 |  |  |                                      |   |  |                  | 60     |   |                |  |     |   |  |  | 60     |  
|                                                        |  |                      |        |   |                             |  |        |                                 |  |  |                                       |   |  |                  |        |   |                |  |      |   |  |  |        |  

The gain on derivative instruments of $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (six months ended
June 30, 2011  $7.2 million, year ended December 31, 2011  $13.0 million) originated from the expiration and revaluation of derivative instruments measured at FVTPL.

9.3 Risks Arising from Financial Instruments

Ivanhoe is exposed in varying degrees to
normal market risks inherent in the oil and gas industry, including commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, credit risk, interest rate risk and liquidity risk. The Company recognizes these risks and manages its operations to
minimize the exposure to the extent practicable. There have not been any significant changes to the Companys exposure to risks, or processes to manage these risks as described in the Companys 2011 Form 10-K, except as noted below:

Interest Rate Risk

As at
June 30, 2012, the Company had borrowed $30.0 million under the UBS Loan. Subsequent to quarter end, the Company elected to draw an additional $20.0 million of principal in July 2012. Borrowed amounts incur interest at a rate of one month Libor
plus 10% for the first six months and escalate by 1% per month thereafter. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose Ivanhoe to interest rate risk. The Companys goal is to minimize its interest expense; however, the Company
does not anticipate using hedging contracts in 2012 to manage its interest rate risk.

If the interest rate on the UBS Loan were to increase by
1%, the Companys net loss would increase by approximately $25,000 per month. Similarly, a 1% decrease in the interest rate on the UBS Loan would decrease Ivanhoes net loss by approximately $25,000 per month.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

10. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The Company issued Cdn$73.3 million in Convertible Debentures in the second quarter of 2011. The outstanding principal amount is convertible into common shares of the Company. The fair value of the
convertible component was $0.1 million at June 30, 2012, calculated with the Black-Scholes valuation method using a risk-free interest rate of 1.25%, a dividend yield of 0.0%, a weighted average volatility factor of 40% and an expected life of
4.0 years.

If the volatility used to fair value the convertible component decreased by 10%, the fair value would decrease by $0.1 million. If
volatility increased by 10%, the fair value of the convertible option would increase by $0.2 million.

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

11.1 Operating Lease Arrangements

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company expended $0.8 million (2011  $0.9 million) on operating leases relating to the rental of office space, which expire between 2012 and 2017.

At June 30, 2012, future net minimum payments for operating leases were:



|           |  |  |       | 
|---------- |  |  | ----- | 
|2012       |  |  | 967   | 
|2013       |  |  | 1,432 | 
|2014       |  |  | 595   | 
|2015       |  |  | 401   | 
|After 2015 |  |  | 502   | 
|           |  |  |       | 
|           |  |  | 3,897 | 
|           |  |  |       | 

11.2 Other

Should Ivanhoe receive government and other approvals necessary to develop the northern border of one of the Tamarack leases, the Company will make a cash payment to Talisman of up to Cdn$15.0 million, as
a contingent, final payment for the 2008 purchase of the Tamarack leases.

From time to time, Ivanhoe enters into consulting agreements
whereby a success fee may be payable if and when either a definitive agreement is signed or certain other contractual milestones are met. Under the agreements, the consultant may receive cash, common shares, stock options or some combination
thereof. Similarly, agreements entered into by the Company may contain cancellation fees or liquidated damages provisions for early termination. These fees are not considered to be material.

The Company may provide indemnities to third parties, in the ordinary course of business, that are customary in certain commercial transactions, such as purchase and sale agreements. The terms of these
indemnities will vary based upon the contract, the nature of which prevents Ivanhoe from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amounts that may be required to be paid. The Companys management is of the opinion that any
resulting settlements relating to indemnities are not likely to be material.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to
legal proceedings being brought against it. While the final outcome of these proceedings is uncertain, the Company believes that these proceedings, in the aggregate, are not reasonably likely to have a material effect on its financial position.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

12. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY

12.1 Share Capital



|                       |  |                                                                                                            |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Authorized             |  | Unlimited common shares with no par value Unlimited preferred shares with no par value                     |  | 
|                       | 
|Issued and Outstanding |  | 344,139,428 common shares (December 31, 2011  344,139,428)
Nil preferred shares (December 31, 2011  nil)

See the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the change in common shares issued in the
six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

12.2 Contributed Surplus

Contributed surplus at June 30, 2012 consisted solely of share-based compensation expense from equity settled awards.

13. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

Share-based transactions were charged to earnings, as general and
administrative or operating expenses, or capitalized to E&E assets as follows:



|                                               |  |                             |       |   |                           |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ----- | - | ------------------------- |  | ----- | ---- |  |  | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                                               |  | Three months ended
June 30, |       |   | Six months ended
June 30, | 
|                                               |  | 2012                        |       |   | 2011                      |  |       | 2012 |  |  | 2011  | 
|Share-based expense related to                 |  |                             |       |   |                           |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|Equity settled transactions                    |  |                             | 1,069 |   |                           |  | 1,459 |      |  |  | 2,223 |  |  |  | 3,235 | 
|Cash settled transactions                      |  |                             | (66   | ) |                           |  | 12    |      |  |  | 16    |  |  |  | 12    | 
|                                               |  |                             |       |   |                           |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|Total share-based expense                      |  |                             | 1,003 |   |                           |  | 1,471 |      |  |  | 2,239 |  |  |  | 3,247 | 
|Share-based payments capitalized as E&E assets |  |                             |      |   |                           |  | 335   |      |  |  |      |  |  |  | 335   | 
|                                               |  |                             |       |   |                           |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 

13.1 Stock Option Plan

Details of transactions under the Companys stock option plan are as follows:



|                                 |  |                               |        |   |                                      |  |      |                               |  |  |                                      |   |  |  |      | 
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ----------------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------ | - |  |  | ---- | 
|                                 |  | June 30, 2012                 |        |   | December 31, 2011                    | 
|                                 |  | Number ofStock 
Options(000s) |        |   | Weighted AverageExercise
Price(Cdn$) |  |      | Number ofStock 
Options(000s) |  |  | Weighted AverageExercise
Price(Cdn$) |  
|Outstanding, beginning of period |  |                               | 15,748 |   |                                      |  | 2.14 |                               |  |  | 16,927                               |   |  |  | 2.24 | 
|Granted                          |  |                               | 2,783  |   |                                      |  | 0.96 |                               |  |  | 2,924                                |   |  |  | 2.06 | 
|Exercised                        |  |                               |       |   |                                      |  |     |                               |  |  | (1,687                               | ) |  |  | 2.44 | 
|Expired                          |  |                               | (463   | ) |                                      |  | 2.22 |                               |  |  | (710                                 | ) |  |  | 2.90 | 
|Forfeited                        |  |                               | (871   | ) |                                      |  | 2.20 |                               |  |  | (1,706                               | ) |  |  | 2.46 | 
|                                 |  |                               |        |   |                                      |  |      |                               |  |  |                                      |   |  |  |      | 
|Outstanding, end of period       |  |                               | 17,197 |   |                                      |  | 1.95 |                               |  |  | 15,748                               |   |  |  | 2.14 | 
|                                 |  |                               |        |   |                                      |  |      |                               |  |  |                                      |   |  |  |      | 
|Exercisable, end of period       |  |                               | 8,949  |   |                                      |  | 2.13 |                               |  |  | 8,231                                |   |  |  | 2.13 | 
|                                 |  |                               |        |   |                                      |  |      |                               |  |  |                                      |   |  |  |      | 

Shares authorized for issue under the option plan at June 30, 2012 were 24.1 million (December 31, 2011 
24.1 million).

There were no stock options exercised in the six months ended June 30, 2012. The weighted average share price per option
at the date of exercise for stock options exercised in the six months ended June 30, 2011 was Cdn$3.28.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

The weighted average fair value of stock options granted from the stock option plan during the six months
ended June 30, 2012 was Cdn$0.69 (2011  Cdn$1.61) per option at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used for the calculation were:



|                          |  |      |      |   |      |  |      |  
|------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- | - | ---- |  | ---- | -
|Six months ended June 30, |  | 2012 |      |   | 2011 | 
|Expected life (in years)  |  |      | 6.3  |   |      |  | 6.3  |  
|Volatility(1)             |  |      | 73.8 | % |      |  | 74.5 | %
|Dividend yield            |  |      |     |   |      |  |     |  
|Risk-free rate            |  |      | 1.7  | % |      |  | 2.7  | %
|Estimated forfeiture rate |  |      | 7.9  | % |      |  | 6.0  | %



|(1) | Expected volatility factor based on historical volatility of the Companys publicly traded common shares.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|The | following table summarizes information in respect of stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2012:
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                |  |                   |        |  |                                                  |  |     |                                      |  |  |      | 
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------------ |  | --- | ------------------------------------ |  |  | ---- | 
|Range of Exercise Prices (Cdn$) |  | Outstanding(000s) |        |  | Weighted AverageRemainingContractual Life(years) |  |     | Weighted AverageExercise
Price(Cdn$) | 
|0.86 to 1.29                    |  |                   | 3,698  |  |                                                  |  | 6.7 |                                      |  |  | 0.95 | 
|1.30 to 1.89                    |  |                   | 3,943  |  |                                                  |  | 1.3 |                                      |  |  | 1.61 | 
|1.90 to 2.79                    |  |                   | 8,341  |  |                                                  |  | 4.1 |                                      |  |  | 2.36 | 
|2.80 to 3.44                    |  |                   | 1,215  |  |                                                  |  | 4.5 |                                      |  |  | 3.26 | 
|                                |  |                   |        |  |                                                  |  |     |                                      |  |  |      | 
|                                |  |                   | 17,197 |  |                                                  |  | 4.0 |                                      |  |  | 1.95 | 
|                                |  |                   |        |  |                                                  |  |     |                                      |  |  |      | 

13.2 Restricted Share Unit Plan

The Company adopted a restricted share unit (RSU) plan in the second quarter of 2011 under which it may issue restricted share units to eligible employees. RSUs vest in equal increments over
three years and are settled in shares or cash on the anniversary date. RSUs do not entitle the holder to exercise voting rights until they have vested and the underlying shares have been delivered to the participant.

Details of transactions under the Companys RSU plan are as follows:



|                                 |  |                         |       |   |                                  |  |      |                        |  |  |                                  |   |  |  |      | 
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ----- | - | -------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------------------- |  |  | -------------------------------- | - |  |  | ---- | 
|                                 |  | June 30, 2012           |       |   | December 31, 2011                | 
|                                 |  | Number ofRSUs(000s) (1) |       |   | WeightedAverage 
FairValue(Cdn$) |  |      | Number ofRSUs(000s)(1) |  |  | WeightedAverage 
FairValue(Cdn$) |  
|Outstanding, beginning of period |  |                         | 937   |   |                                  |  | 1.53 |                        |  |  |                                 |   |  |  |     | 
|Granted                          |  |                         | 2,498 |   |                                  |  | 0.69 |                        |  |  | 1,115                            |   |  |  | 1.62 | 
|Vested                           |  |                         | (283  | ) |                                  |  | 1.14 |                        |  |  |                                 |   |  |  |     | 
|Forfeited                        |  |                         | (143  | ) |                                  |  | 1.10 |                        |  |  | (178                             | ) |  |  | 2.08 | 
|                                 |  |                         |       |   |                                  |  |      |                        |  |  |                                  |   |  |  |      | 
|Outstanding, end of period       |  |                         | 3,009 |   |                                  |  | 0.77 |                        |  |  | 937                              |   |  |  | 1.53 | 
|                                 |  |                         |       |   |                                  |  |      |                        |  |  |                                  |   |  |  |      | 



|(1) | Includes RSUs that will be withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy statutory tax withholding requirements.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



15



---

##### Table of Contents

The weighted average fair value of RSUs granted during the six months ended June 30, 2012 was
Cdn$0.69 per RSU at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used for the calculation were:



|                          |  |      |      |   |      |  |      |  
|------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- | - | ---- |  | ---- | -
|Six months ended June 30, |  | 2012 |      |   | 2011 | 
|Expected life (in years)  |  |      | 2.0  |   |      |  | 3.0  |  
|Volatility(1)             |  |      | 68.9 | % |      |  | 62.7 | %
|Dividend yield            |  |      |     |   |      |  |     |  
|Risk-free rate            |  |      | 1.2  | % |      |  | 1.7  | %
|Estimated forfeiture rate |  |      | 20.0 | % |      |  | 6.1  | %



|(1) | Expected volatility factor based on historical volatility of the Companys publicly traded common shares.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The liabilities arising from the RSUs to be settled by way of cash payments and the intrinsic value of those liabilities are:



|                                      |  |               |     | 
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | --- | 
|                                      |  | June 30, 2012 |    
|Current liabilities related to RSUs   |  |               | 107 | 
|Long term liabilities related to RSUs |  |               | 67  | 
|Intrinsic value of vested RSUs        |  |               | 164 | 

14. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Ivanhoes organizational structure reflects its various operating activities and the geographic areas in which it operates. Oil and gas operations are divided into three geographic segments: Asia,
Canada and Latin America. Asian operations capture the Companys oil production in Dagang and Daqing and exploration at Zitong in China, as well as exploration in Mongolia. The Canadian segment comprises activities from Ivanhoes oil sands
development project at Tamarack. Latin America consists of exploration and development of Block 20 in Ecuador.

The Technology Development
area captures costs incurred to develop, enhance and identify improvements in the application of the Companys HTL technology. The Corporate area consists of costs that are not directly allocable to operating projects, such as executive
officers, corporate financings and other general corporate activities.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as the
Companys consolidated accounting policies. Segment results include transactions between business segments. Corporate activities undertaken on behalf of a segment are allocated at cost. Oil revenue is classified according to the geographic
location of the production. Segment liabilities include intercompany balances.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

The following tables present the Companys segment loss, capital investments and identifiable assets
and liabilities.



|                                                    |  |      |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |                       |   |  |           |         |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ------ |  | ------- | ------------ |  |  | --------------------- | - |  | --------- | ------- | - | ----- |  | -------- | - |  |  | ------- | -
|                                                    |  | Asia |         |   | Canada |  |         | LatinAmerica |  |  | TechnologyDevelopment |   |  | Corporate |         |   | Total | 
|Segment revenue (1)                                 |  |      |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |                       |   |  |           |         |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|For the three months ended June 30, 2012            |  |      | 11,292  |   |        |  |        |              |  |  |                      |   |  |           |        |   |       |  | 5        |   |  |  | 11,297  |  
|For the three months ended June 30, 2011            |  |      | 9,391   |   |        |  |        |              |  |  |                      |   |  |           |        |   |       |  | 141      |   |  |  | 9,532   |  
|                                                    |  |      |         |   |        | 
|For the six months ended June 30, 2012              |  |      | 19,201  |   |        |  |        |              |  |  |                      |   |  |           |        |   |       |  | 10       |   |  |  | 19,211  |  
|For the six months ended June 30, 2011              |  |      | 17,511  |   |        |  |        |              |  |  |                      |   |  |           |        |   |       |  | 207      |   |  |  | 17,718  |  
|Segment income (loss)                               |  |      |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |                       |   |  |           |         |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|For the three months ended June 30, 2012            |  |      | 1,116   |   |        |  | (1,028  | )            |  |  | (1,600                | ) |  |           | (2,061  | ) |       |  | (1,130   | ) |  |  | (4,703  | )
|For the three months ended June 30, 2011            |  |      | 461     |   |        |  | (979    | )            |  |  | (2,160                | ) |  |           | (2,759  | ) |       |  | 1,326    |   |  |  | (4,111  | )
|                                                    |  |      |         |   |        | 
|For the six months ended June 30, 2012              |  |      | 940     |   |        |  | (2,456  | )            |  |  | (2,543                | ) |  |           | (4,190  | ) |       |  | (7,116   | ) |  |  | (15,365 | )
|For the six months ended June 30, 2011              |  |      | (1,711  | ) |        |  | (2,286  | )            |  |  | (3,867                | ) |  |           | (5,007  | ) |       |  | (2,366   | ) |  |  | (15,237 | )
|Segment assets (2)                                  |  |      |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |                       |   |  |           |         |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|As at June 30, 2012                                 |  |      | 122,972 |   |        |  | 138,675 |              |  |  | 60,022                |   |  |           | 102,201 |   |       |  | 33,610   |   |  |  | 457,480 |  
|As at December 31, 2011                             |  |      | 107,902 |   |        |  | 133,880 |              |  |  | 40,216                |   |  |           | 102,435 |   |       |  | 29,277   |   |  |  | 413,710 |  
|Segment liabilities (3)                             |  |      |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |                       |   |  |           |         |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|As at June 30, 2012                                 |  |      | 154,750 |   |        |  | 151,779 |              |  |  | 84,210                |   |  |           | 91,778  |   |       |  | (325,978 | ) |  |  | 156,539 |  
|As at December 31, 2011                             |  |      | 140,621 |   |        |  | 144,531 |              |  |  | 64,362                |   |  |           | 87,822  |   |       |  | (337,763 | ) |  |  | 99,573  |  
|Capital investments  Intangible                    |  |      |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |                       |   |  |           |         |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|For the three months ended June 30, 2012            |  |      | 9,488   |   |        |  | 642     |              |  |  | 9,379                 |   |  |           |        |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 19,509  |  
|For the three months ended June 30, 2011            |  |      | 7,607   |   |        |  | 1,806   |              |  |  | 4,493                 |   |  |           |        |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 13,906  |  
|                                                    |  |      |         |   |        | 
|For the six months ended June 30, 2012              |  |      | 10,094  |   |        |  | 2,751   |              |  |  | 15,205                |   |  |           |        |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 28,050  |  
|For the six months ended June 30, 2011              |  |      | 14,106  |   |        |  | 3,847   |              |  |  | 5,819                 |   |  |           |        |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 23,772  |  
|Capital investments  Property, plant and equipment |  |      |         |   |        |  |         |              |  |  |                       |   |  |           |         |   |       |  |          |   |  |  |         |  
|For the three months ended June 30, 2012            |  |      | 5,110   |   |        |  |        |              |  |  |                      |   |  |           |        |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 5,110   |  
|For the three months ended June 30, 2011            |  |      | 2,755   |   |        |  |        |              |  |  | (5                    | ) |  |           | 764     |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 3,514   |  
|                                                    |  |      |         |   |        | 
|For the six months ended June 30, 2012              |  |      | 5,419   |   |        |  |        |              |  |  |                      |   |  |           | 34      |   |       |  | 41       |   |  |  | 5,494   |  
|For the six months ended June 30, 2011              |  |      | 6,301   |   |        |  |        |              |  |  | 58                    |   |  |           | 1,104   |   |       |  |         |   |  |  | 7,463   |  



|(1) | All oil revenues in Asia are generated from the sale of oil production in China to one customer.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Segment assets include investments in subsidiaries that are eliminated for consolidation under Corporate and assets classified as held for sale.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Liabilities for Corporate include intercompany receivables of $454.6 million at June 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011$428.7 million) resulting in a negative
balance.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



17



---

##### Table of Contents

15. OPERATING EXPENSES

Operating expenses for the Company are comprised of the following:



|                       |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----- | ---- |  |  | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                       |  | Three months endedJune 30, |       |  | Six months endedJune 30, | 
|                       |  | 2012                       |       |  | 2011                     |  |       | 2012 |  |  | 2011  | 
|Asia                   |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|Field operating        |  |                            | 1,547 |  |                          |  | 1,692 |      |  |  | 3,283 |  |  |  | 3,315 | 
|Windfall levy          |  |                            | 2,270 |  |                          |  | 2,182 |      |  |  | 3,728 |  |  |  | 3,759 | 
|Engineering support    |  |                            | 108   |  |                          |  | 103   |      |  |  | 226   |  |  |  | 213   | 
|                       |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|                       |  |                            | 3,925 |  |                          |  | 3,977 |      |  |  | 7,237 |  |  |  | 7,287 | 
|Technology Development |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|FTF operating costs    |  |                            | 921   |  |                          |  | 1,362 |      |  |  | 2,257 |  |  |  | 2,575 | 
|                       |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|Total operating costs  |  |                            | 4,846 |  |                          |  | 5,339 |      |  |  | 9,494 |  |  |  | 9,862 | 
|                       |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 

The windfall levy is imposed by Chinas Ministry of Finance at the progressive rates from 20% to 40% on the portion
of the monthly weighted average sales price of the crude oil lifted in China exceeding US$55.00 per barrel.

16. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW
INFORMATION

Changes in Non-Cash Activities



|                                         |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------ |  | ------ | ---- |  |  | ------ | - |  |  | ------ | -
|                                         |  | Three months endedJune 30, |        |   | Six months endedJune 30, | 
|                                         |  | 2012                       |        |   | 2011                     |  |        | 2012 |  |  | 2011   |  
|Operating activities                     |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Accounts receivable                      |  |                            | 1,684  |   |                          |  | (2,022 | )    |  |  | 2,475  |   |  |  | (2,646 | )
|Note receivable                          |  |                            | 4      |   |                          |  | 2      |      |  |  | 1      |   |  |  | 33     |  
|Prepaid and other current assets         |  |                            | 223    |   |                          |  | (214   | )    |  |  | 167    |   |  |  | (148   | )
|Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  |                            | (2,445 | ) |                          |  | 3,278  |      |  |  | (3,629 | ) |  |  | 4,739  |  
|                                         |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|                                         |  |                            | (534   | ) |                          |  | 1,044  |      |  |  | (986   | ) |  |  | 1,978  |  
|                                         |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Investing activities                     |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Accounts receivable                      |  |                            | 18     |   |                          |  | 80     |      |  |  | 5      |   |  |  | 556    |  
|Prepaid and other current assets         |  |                            | (4     | ) |                          |  | 1,509  |      |  |  | (37    | ) |  |  | 2,241  |  
|Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  |                            | 17,524 |   |                          |  | (507   | )    |  |  | 21,705 |   |  |  | 1,781  |  
|                                         |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|                                         |  |                            | 17,538 |   |                          |  | 1,082  |      |  |  | 21,673 |   |  |  | 4,578  |  
|                                         |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Financing activities                     |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  |                            |       |   |                          |  | (28    | )    |  |  |       |   |  |  | (47    | )
|                                         |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|                                         |  |                            | 17,004 |   |                          |  | 2,098  |      |  |  | 20,687 |   |  |  | 6,509  |  
|                                         |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  



18



---

##### Table of Contents

17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Ivanhoe is party to cost sharing agreements with other companies which are related or controlled through common directors or shareholders. Through these agreements, the Company shares office space,
furnishings, equipment, air travel and communications facilities in various international locations. Ivanhoe also shares the costs of employing administrative and non-executive management personnel at these offices. These related party transactions
are in the normal course of business and the Company believes them to be valued at fair market value.

The breakdown of the related party
expenses for the three and six months ended June 30 is as follows:



|                               |  |                       |  |                            |     |  |                          |  |     |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------- | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | --- | ---- |  |  | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                               |  |                       |  | Three months endedJune 30, |     |  | Six months endedJune 30, | 
|Related Party                  |  | Nature of Transaction |  | 2012                       |     |  | 2011                     |  |     | 2012 |  |  | 2011  | 
|Global Mining Management Corp. |  | Administration        |  |                            | 25  |  |                          |  | 116 |      |  |  | 184   |  |  |  | 329   | 
|Ivanhoe Capital Aviation Ltd.  |  | Aircraft              |  |                            | 300 |  |                          |  | 300 |      |  |  | 600   |  |  |  | 600   | 
|I2MS.Net PTE Ltd.              |  | Information systems   |  |                            | 47  |  |                          |  | 50  |      |  |  | 94    |  |  |  | 108   | 
|Ivanhoe Capital Services Ltd.  |  | Administration        |  |                            | 104 |  |                          |  | 29  |      |  |  | 176   |  |  |  | 121   | 
|SouthGobi Resources Ltd.       |  | Administration        |  |                            |    |  |                          |  | 26  |      |  |  | 38    |  |  |  | 77    | 
|1092155 Ontario Inc.           |  | HTL technology       |  |                            | 12  |  |                          |  | 8   |      |  |  | 24    |  |  |  | 20    | 
|Ivanhoe Capital PTE Ltd.       |  | Administration        |  |                            |    |  |                          |  | 46  |      |  |  |      |  |  |  | 115   | 
|Ivanhoe Capital Finance Ltd.   |  | Financing             |  |                            | 168 |  |                          |  |    |      |  |  | 993   |  |  |  |      | 
|                               |  |                       |  |                            |     |  |                          |  |     |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|                               |  |                       |  |                            | 656 |  |                          |  | 575 |      |  |  | 2,109 |  |  |  | 1,370 | 
|                               |  |                       |  |                            |     |  |                          |  |     |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 

The liabilities of the Company include the following amounts due to related parties:



|                               |  |                       |  |              |        |  |                  |  |     | 
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------- |  | ------------ | ------ |  | ---------------- |  | --- | 
|Related Party                  |  | Nature of Transaction |  | June 30,2012 |        |  | December 31,2011 | 
|Global Mining Management Corp. |  | Administration        |  |              | 15     |  |                  |  | 52  | 
|I2MS.Net PTE Ltd.              |  | Information systems   |  |              | 15     |  |                  |  | 18  | 
|SouthGobi Resources Ltd.       |  | Administration        |  |              |       |  |                  |  | 13  | 
|Ivanhoe Capital Services Ltd.  |  | Administration        |  |              | 44     |  |                  |  | 93  | 
|Ivanhoe Capital PTE Ltd.       |  | Administration        |  |              |       |  |                  |  | 7   | 
|Ivanhoe Capital Finance Ltd.   |  | Financing             |  |              | 10,493 |  |                  |  |    | 
|                               |  |                       |  |              |        |  |                  |  |     | 
|                               |  |                       |  |              | 10,567 |  |                  |  | 183 | 
|                               |  |                       |  |              |        |  |                  |  |     | 



19



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

With the exception of historical information, certain matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q), including those within this Item 2  Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

Statements that contain words such as could, should, can, anticipate, estimate, propose, plan, expect,
believe, will, may and similar expressions and statements relating to matters that are not historical facts constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor
provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to statements relating to or associated with individual wells,
regions or projects. Forward-looking statements include statements as to possible future crude oil prices; future production levels; future royalty and tax levels; future capital expenditures, their timing and their allocation to exploration and
development activities; future earnings; future asset acquisitions or dispositions; future sources of funding for the Companys capital programs; future debt levels; availability of future credit facilities; possible commerciality of the
Companys projects; development plans or capacity expansions; future ability to execute dispositions of assets or businesses; future business relationships with third parties; future sources of liquidity, cash flows and their uses; future
drilling of new wells; ultimate recoverability of current and long-term assets; ultimate recoverability of reserves or resources; expected operating costs; the expectation of negotiating of an extension to certain of the Companys petroleum
agreements; the expectation of the Companys ability to comply with the newly enacted safety and environmental rules; estimates on a per share basis; future foreign currency exchange rates, future expenditures and future allowances relating to
environmental matters and the Companys ability to comply therewith; dates by which certain areas will be developed, come on-stream or reach expected operating capacity; and changes in any of the foregoing.

Statements relating to reserves are forward-looking statements, as they involve the implied assessment, based on estimates and assumptions,
that the reserves described exist in the quantities predicted or estimated and can be profitably produced in the future.

The forward-looking
statements contained in this Form 10-Q are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by the Company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors
it believes are relevant in the circumstances. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties including the risk that the outcome that they predict will not be achieved. Undue reliance should not be placed on
forward-looking statements as a number of important factors could cause the actual results to differ materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations and anticipations, estimates and intentions expressed in the forward-looking
statements, including those set out below and those detailed in Item 1A, Risk Factors and Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (2011 Form 10-K). Such factors include, but are not limited to: the Companys history of limited revenue, losses and negative cash flow from its current exploration and development activities
in Canada, Ecuador, China, Mongolia and the United States; the Companys limited cash resources and consequent need for additional financing; the ability to raise capital as and when required, or to raise capital on acceptable terms; the timing
and extent of changes in prices for oil and gas; competition for oil and gas exploration properties from larger, better financed oil and gas companies; environmental risks; title matters; drilling and operating risks; uncertainties about the
estimates of reserves and the potential success of the Companys Heavy-to-light (HTL) technology; the potential success of the Companys oil and gas properties in Canada, Ecuador, China and Mongolia; the prices of goods
and services; the availability of drilling rigs and other support services; legislative and government regulations; political and economic factors in countries in which the Company operates; and unanticipated variances in the implementation of the
Company's capital investment plans and strategies.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are made as of the date hereof
and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by applicable securities laws. The forward-looking statements
contained herein are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

Special Note to Canadian Investors

The Company is a registrant under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and voluntarily files
reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other forms used by registrants that are US domestic issuers. Therefore, the Companys reserves estimates and securities regulatory
disclosures generally follow SEC requirements. National Instrument 51-101  Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101), adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), prescribes
certain standards for the preparation, and disclosure of reserves and related information by Canadian issuers. The Company has been granted certain exemptions from NI 51-101. Please refer to the Special Note to Canadian Investors in the 2011
Form 10-K.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

Advisories

This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Companys June 30, 2012 unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (the Financial Statements) contained herein, and
the audited consolidated financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the 2011 Form 10-K. The Financial Statements have been prepared using accounting policies
consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, Interim Financial Reporting (IAS 34).

As a foreign private issuer in the US, Ivanhoe is permitted to file with the SEC financial statements prepared under IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, without a
reconciliation to US GAAP. It is possible that some of the Companys accounting policies under IFRS could be different from US GAAP.

Non-IFRS Financial Measures

Oil
revenue per barrel is calculated by dividing the Companys oil revenue by its total production for the respective periods presented. Net operating revenue per barrel is calculated by dividing oil revenue less related operating costs by total
production for the respective periods presented. Net revenue (loss) from operations per barrel is calculated by subtracting depletion from net operating revenue and dividing by total production for the respective periods presented. The Company
believes oil revenue per barrel, net operating revenue per barrel and net revenue (loss) from operations per barrel are important to investors to evaluate operating results and the Companys ability to generate cash. Each of the components used
in these calculations can be reconciled directly to the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. The calculations of oil revenue per barrel, net operating revenue per barrel and net revenue (loss) from operations
per barrel may differ from similar calculations of other companies in the oil and gas industry, thereby limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.

THE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANYS OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES, WITH RESPECT TO OIL AND GAS VOLUMES, RESERVES AND RELATED PERFORMANCE MEASURES, PRESENT THE COMPANYS NET WORKING INTEREST
AFTER ROYALTIES. ALL TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF U.S. DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND PRODUCTION DATA INCLUDING REVENUES AND COSTS PER BOE.

As generally used in the oil and gas business and throughout this Form 10-Q, the following terms have the following meanings:



|        |  |                                        |  |         |  |                                                    
|------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|        |  |                                        | 
|bbl     |  | =    barrel                            |  | mboe    |  | =    thousands of barrels of oil equivalent        
|        |  |                                        | 
|bbls/d  |  | =    barrels per day                   |  | mboe/d  |  | =    thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day
|        |  |                                        | 
|boe     |  | =    barrel of oil equivalent          |  | mcf     |  | =    thousands of cubic feet                       
|        |  |                                        | 
|boe/d   |  | =    barrels of oil equivalent per day |  | mmbbls  |  | =    million barrels                               
|        |  |                                        | 
|mbbls   |  | =    thousand barrels                  |  | mmbls/d |  | =    million barrels per day                       
|        |  |                                        | 
|mbbls/d |  | =    thousand barrels per day          |  |         |  |                                                    

Oil equivalents compare quantities of oil with quantities of gas or express these different commodities in a common unit.
In calculating barrel of oil equivalents (boe), the generally recognized industry standard is one bbl is equal to six mcf. Boes may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. The conversion ratio is based on an energy equivalent conversion
method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.

Electronic copies of the
Companys filings with the SEC and the CSA are available, free of charge, through the Companys website (www.ivanhoeenergy.com) or, upon request, by contacting its investor relations department at (403) 261-1700. Alternatively, the
SEC and the CSA each maintains a website (www.sec.gov and www.sedar.com) from which the Companys periodic reports and other public filings with the SEC and the CSA can be obtained. Copies of the charters for each of the committees of the
Company's board of directors are available through the Companys website at www.ivanhoeenergy.com/index.php?page=mandate_of_the_boardcommittee_overview.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

HIGHLIGHTS



|                                       |  |                            |        |   |                           |  |        |      |  |  |         |   |  |  |         |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------- |  | ------ | ---- |  |  | ------- | - |  |  | ------- | -
|                                       |  | Three monthsended June 30, |        |   | Six months ended June 30, | 
|($000, except as stated)               |  | 2012                       |        |   | 2011                      |  |        | 2012 |  |  | 2011    |  
|Average daily production (bbls/d)      |  |                            | 1,017  |   |                           |  | 940    |      |  |  | 894     |   |  |  | 973     |  
|Realized oil prices ($/bbl)            |  |                            | 121.99 |   |                           |  | 109.71 |      |  |  | 118.01  |   |  |  | 99.38   |  
|Oil revenue                            |  |                            | 11,292 |   |                           |  | 9,389  |      |  |  | 19,200  |   |  |  | 17,508  |  
|Capital expenditures                   |  |                            | 24,619 |   |                           |  | 17,420 |      |  |  | 33,544  |   |  |  | 31,235  |  
|                                       |  |                            |        |  
|Cash flow used in operating activities |  |                            | (4,184 | ) |                           |  | (6,455 | )    |  |  | (11,076 | ) |  |  | (13,464 | )
|Net loss                               |  |                            | (4,703 | ) |                           |  | (4,111 | )    |  |  | (15,365 | ) |  |  | (15,237 | )
|Net loss per share, basic and diluted  |  |                            | (0.01  | ) |                           |  | (0.01  | )    |  |  | (0.04   | ) |  |  | (0.04   | )

Ivanhoes oil revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased from the second quarter of 2011 due to
a combination of increased net volumes and higher pricing. Oil production from the Dagang field in China was relatively constant. However, the terms of the production sharing contract stipulate that capital expenditures are to be funded 100% by
Ivanhoe and CNPCs portion of the costs will be reimbursed through the receipt of additional oil sales. Due to higher capital activity at Dagang in the current quarter, more oil production was allocated to Ivanhoe in the three months ended
June 30, 2012.

The net loss in the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $4.7 million compared to a $4.1 million net loss in the
second quarter of 2011. Although the current quarter benefitted from higher revenue and lower general and administrative expenses, unrealized derivative instrument gains were smaller in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of
2011.

Capital expenditures for the Company totaled $24.6 million in the second quarter of 2012. In China, Ivanhoe focused on a 160 square
kilometer, 3-D seismic acquisition program at Zitong as well as drilling two wells, completing one well and continuing the fracture stimulation program at Dagang.

In Canada, the regulatory approval process for the Tamarack Project continued to advance. The Company has been working with regulators to answer technical questions and with local area stakeholders to
address their specific areas of interest. Responses to the regulators second round of Supplemental Information Requests were submitted on July 6, 2012. Although the Company anticipates receiving approval of the application by the end of
2012, timing is subject to the pace of the regulatory process.

In Ecuador, the Company commenced drilling the IP-17 exploration well in the
first quarter of 2012 to evaluate the potential of the southern part of the Pungarayacu field. Drilling continued throughout the second and third quarters and the Company drilled to a total depth of 13,594 feet, where the well was cased and
suspended. The well confirmed the presence of hydrocarbons in the Hollin and Napo formations and evaluated the potential of the deeper, pre-cretaceous structures. While hydrocarbons were found in the Hollin and Napo formations, the reservoir in the
immediate vicinity of the well was not suitable for commercial exploitation. Additional work is required to explain the Hollin and Napo reservoir characteristics south of the Napo river. In the pre-cretaceous, the well did not have commercial
quantities of hydrocarbons, but the evaluation does show good indications that the formations have the potential of generating and storing hydrocarbons.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



|                                   |  |                            |        |  |                          |  |        |      |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|---------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ |  | ------------------------ |  | ------ | ---- |  |  | ------- |  |  |  | ------- | 
|                                   |  | Three monthsended June 30, |        |  | Six months endedJune 30, | 
|                                   |  | 2012                       |        |  | 2011                     |  |        | 2012 |  |  | 2011    | 
|Asia (net bbls)                    |  |                            |        |  |                          |  |        |      |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|Dagang                             |  |                            | 88,993 |  |                          |  | 81,664 |      |  |  | 155,122 |  |  |  | 168,529 | 
|Daqing                             |  |                            | 3,577  |  |                          |  | 3,917  |      |  |  | 7,585   |  |  |  | 7,651   | 
|                                   |  |                            |        |  |                          |  |        |      |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|Total production                   |  |                            | 92,570 |  |                          |  | 85,581 |      |  |  | 162,707 |  |  |  | 176,180 | 
|                                   |  |                            |        |  |                          |  |        |      |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|Average daily production (bbls/d)  |  |                            | 1,017  |  |                          |  | 940    |      |  |  | 894     |  |  |  | 973     | 
|                                   |  |                            |        | 
|Pricing                            |  |                            |        |  |                          |  |        |      |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|Average realized oil price ($/bbl) |  |                            | 121.99 |  |                          |  | 109.71 |      |  |  | 118.01  |  |  |  | 99.38   | 
|Average Brent ($/bbl)              |  |                            | 108.33 |  |                          |  | 117.33 |      |  |  | 113.03  |  |  |  | 111.14  | 



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Oil Revenue

Ivanhoes oil revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 increased from the comparable periods in 2011. In the second quarter of 2012, revenue increased in comparison to the second
quarter of 2011 due to a combination of higher net production volumes as well as higher realized prices. Oil production from the Dagang field in China was relatively constant. However, the terms of the Companys production sharing contract at
Dagang with China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) stipulate that capital expenditures are to be funded 100% by Ivanhoe and CNPCs portion of the costs are reimbursed through the receipt of additional oil sales.

Revenue was higher in the first six months of 2012 than in the first half of 2011 as a result of stronger realized prices, despite lower net production
volumes. Less oil production was allocated to Ivanhoe in the first half of 2012 than in 2011 due to lower capital activity at Dagang in comparison to the prior year.

Net Revenue from Operations



|                               |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|------------------------------ |  | -------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------ |  | ------ | ---- |  |  | ------ | - |  |  | ------ | -
|                               |  | Three monthsended June 30, |        |   | Six months endedJune 30, | 
|($/bbl)                        |  | 2012                       |        |   | 2011                     |  |        | 2012 |  |  | 2011   |  
|Oil revenue(1)                 |  |                            | 121.99 |   |                          |  | 109.71 |      |  |  | 118.01 |   |  |  | 99.38  |  
|Less operating costs           |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Field operating                |  |                            | (16.70 | ) |                          |  | (19.76 | )    |  |  | (20.17 | ) |  |  | (18.81 | )
|Windfall Levy                  |  |                            | (24.52 | ) |                          |  | (25.51 | )    |  |  | (22.91 | ) |  |  | (21.34 | )
|Engineering and support costs  |  |                            | (1.18  | ) |                          |  | (1.20  | )    |  |  | (1.40  | ) |  |  | (1.21  | )
|                               |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Net operating revenue(1)       |  |                            | 79.59  |   |                          |  | 63.24  |      |  |  | 73.53  |   |  |  | 58.02  |  
|Depletion                      |  |                            | (22.99 | ) |                          |  | (18.74 | )    |  |  | (22.60 | ) |  |  | (18.03 | )
|                               |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  
|Net revenue from operations(1) |  |                            | 56.60  |   |                          |  | 44.50  |      |  |  | 50.93  |   |  |  | 39.99  |  
|                               |  |                            |        |   |                          |  |        |      |  |  |        |   |  |  |        |  



|(1) | Oil revenue per barrel, net operating revenue per barrel and net revenue from operations per barrel do not have standardized meanings prescribed by IFRS and therefore
may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Please refer to the Non-IFRS Financial Measures under the Advisories section in this MD&A for more details.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operating Costs



|                       |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----- | ---- |  |  | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                       |  | Three monthsended June 30, |       |  | Six monthsended June 30, | 
|                       |  | 2012                       |       |  | 2011                     |  |       | 2012 |  |  | 2011  | 
|Asia                   |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|Field operating        |  |                            | 1,547 |  |                          |  | 1,692 |      |  |  | 3,283 |  |  |  | 3,315 | 
|Windfall Levy          |  |                            | 2,270 |  |                          |  | 2,182 |      |  |  | 3,728 |  |  |  | 3,759 | 
|Engineering support    |  |                            | 108   |  |                          |  | 103   |      |  |  | 226   |  |  |  | 213   | 
|                       |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|                       |  |                            | 3,925 |  |                          |  | 3,977 |      |  |  | 7,237 |  |  |  | 7,287 | 
|Technology Development |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|FTF operating costs    |  |                            | 921   |  |                          |  | 1,362 |      |  |  | 2,257 |  |  |  | 2,575 | 
|                       |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|Total operating costs  |  |                            | 4,846 |  |                          |  | 5,339 |      |  |  | 9,494 |  |  |  | 9,862 | 
|                       |  |                            |       |  |                          |  |       |      |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 

Total operating costs in China in the three months ended June 30, 2012 were consistent with the second quarter of
2011. However, operating costs per barrel were $4.07/bbl lower in the three months ended June 30, 2012 than in the comparable period due to higher production volumes in the current quarter. Field operating costs per barrel were lower in the
current quarter as staff activity was concentrated on capital activities in Dagang and, as a result, staff costs were capitalized rather than expensed. The Company completed fewer maintenance workovers in 2012 than in the prior year, which also
resulted in lower field costs and the Windfall Levy per barrel was lower in the current quarter as the Windfall Levy threshold increased to $55.00/bbl on November 1, 2011.

Similarly, total operating costs in China were consistent for the first half of 2012 and 2011. However, operating costs were $3.12/bbl higher in the six months ended June 30, 2012 than in the
comparable period. Field operating costs per barrel were higher in the first half of 2012 due to less capital activity in the Dagang field while the Windfall Levy per barrel was greater in the first half of 2012 as a result of higher realized
prices.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

Operating costs for technology development were incurred at the Companys Feedstock Test Facility
(FTF) at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas. FTF operating costs in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were lower than in the comparable periods due to more streamlined data collection and analysis
during project testing in the second quarter of 2012.

General and Administrative

G&A expenses were $1.3 million lower in the three months ended June 30, 2012 than in the second quarter of 2011. Due to
reduced activity in the Companys Asia segment and streamlining operations in Canada and Latin America, staff and travel costs were $0.3 million lower in the current quarter than in the comparable period. Non-cash stock based compensation was
$0.5 million lower in the current quarter than in the second quarter of 2011 and contract engineering costs related to Ivanhoes HTLTMtechnology decreased $0.3 million in the current quarter compared to the second quarter of 2011, both of which were
marginally offset by minor cost increases in other areas.

G&A expenses were $4.3 million lower in the six months ended June 30, 2012
than in the first half of 2011. The reduction is primarily attributable to $2.5 million of staff bonuses that were paid, but not accrued for, in the first quarter of 2011. Non-cash stock based compensation was $1.0 million lower to date in 2012
compared to the first half of 2011. Due to reduced activity in the Companys Asia segment, staff and contractor costs were $1.0 million lower in the six months ended June 30, 2012 than in the comparable period.

Depletion and Depreciation

Depletion
and depreciation charges in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were $0.5 million higher over comparable periods due to higher depletion costs in Asia. Depletion in Asia in the current quarter was higher than in the second quarter of
2011 due to a combination of higher production volumes and a higher depletion rate. The depletion rate rose as a result of lower reserves assigned to Dagang at December 31, 2011.

Depletion in the first half of 2012 was also higher than in the first half of 2011, but the increase was predominantly a result of the higher depletion rate, which was slightly offset by lower year over
year production volumes.

The FTF depreciation expense was consistent with the comparable periods in 2011.

Foreign Exchange

The Company recognized
a foreign exchange gain of $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2012 in comparison to a gain of $0.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011. In the current quarter, the Canadian dollar weakened in comparison to the US dollar, creating
a gain on the translation of the Companys Cdn$73.3 million convertible debentures (Convertible Debentures) into US dollars, which was marginally offset by foreign exchange losses on the Companys Canadian dollar cash and
accounts payable balances. In comparison, the Canadian dollar weakened only slightly against the US dollar in the second quarter of 2011, resulting in a foreign exchange gain of $0.2 million.

In the first half of 2012, the foreign exchange gain was greater than in the first half of 2011. Changes in the exchange rates and holding less Canadian dollar cash resulted in a gain of $0.8 million in
the first half of 2012. Ivanhoe held higher amounts of Canadian dollar debt in the first half of 2011, however, gains on the translation of the Companys Canadian dollar denominated debt were partially offset by losses on the translation of
Canadian dollar cash.

Derivative Instruments

In the second quarter of 2012, Ivanhoe recognized an unrealized gain of $1.3 million on the revaluation of the convertible component of the Convertible Debentures. In comparison, the Company recognized an
unrealized gain of $6.1 million on its derivative liabilities in the second quarter of 2011. The expiry of the Companys 2006 purchase warrants resulted in a gain of $2.3 million; a gain of $0.7 million was recognized on the revaluation of the
convertible portion of the convertible note, and the revaluation of the convertible portion of the Convertible Debentures created a gain of $2.2 million in the second quarter of 2011. The revaluation of an option granted to a private investor in
January 2010 to acquire an equity interest in one of the Companys subsidiaries (Subsidiary Option) also created a gain of $0.9 million in the second quarter of 2011.

In the first half of 2012, the Company recognized an unrealized gain of $1.7 million on its derivative liabilities due to a $1.6 million gain on the revaluation of the convertible component of the
Convertible Debentures and the expiration of the Subsidiary Option created a gain of $0.2 million. In comparison, the Company sustained an unrealized gain of $7.2 million in the first half of 2011. A combination of the expiry and revaluation of
purchase warrants produced a gain of $4.1 million, while the revaluation of the convertible components of the convertible note and Convertible Debentures created gains of $1.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively, in the first half of 2011. These
gains were offset by a $0.3 million loss on the revaluation of the Subsidiary Option.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

Provision for Income Taxes

Ivanhoe incurred a deferred tax expense of $0.3 million to date in 2012 due to an increase in the Chinese deferred tax liability which was partially offset by a reduction in the US deferred tax liability.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following information about our contractual
obligations and other commitments summarizes certain liquidity and capital resource requirements. The information presented in the table below does not include planned, but not legally committed, capital expenditures or obligations that are
discretionary and/or being performed under contracts which are cancelable on 30 days notice or less.



|                               |  |       |         |  |      |  |        |      |  |  |        |  |  |      |       |  |            |  |       |  |  |  |        | 
|------------------------------ |  | ----- | ------- |  | ---- |  | ------ | ---- |  |  | ------ |  |  | ---- | ----- |  | ---------- |  | ----- |  |  |  | ------ | 
|                               |  | Total |         |  | 2012 |  |        | 2013 |  |  | 2014   |  |  | 2015 |       |  | After 2015 | 
|Short term debt and interest   |  |       | 43,793  |  |      |  | 1,771  |      |  |  | 42,022 |  |  |      |      |  |            |  |      |  |  |  |       | 
|Long term debt and interest    |  |       | 88,613  |  |      |  | 2,123  |      |  |  | 4,140  |  |  |      | 4,140 |  |            |  | 4,140 |  |  |  | 74,070 | 
|Zitong appraisal program       |  |       | 66,510  |  |      |  | 31,680 |      |  |  | 31,680 |  |  |      | 3,150 |  |            |  |      |  |  |  |       | 
|Ecuador drilling program       |  |       | 5,201   |  |      |  | 5,110  |      |  |  | 91     |  |  |      |      |  |            |  |      |  |  |  |       | 
|Decommissioning obligations(1) |  |       | 3,520   |  |      |  |       |      |  |  | 385    |  |  |      |      |  |            |  |      |  |  |  | 3,135  | 
|Leases                         |  |       | 3,897   |  |      |  | 967    |      |  |  | 1,432  |  |  |      | 595   |  |            |  | 401   |  |  |  | 502    | 
|                               |  |       |         |  |      |  |        |      |  |  |        |  |  |      |       |  |            |  |       |  |  |  |        | 
|Total                          |  |       | 211,534 |  |      |  | 41,651 |      |  |  | 79,750 |  |  |      | 7,885 |  |            |  | 4,541 |  |  |  | 77,707 | 
|                               |  |       |         |  |      |  |        |      |  |  |        |  |  |      |       |  |            |  |       |  |  |  |        | 



|(1) | Represents undiscounted asset retirement obligations after inflation. The discounted value of these estimated obligations ($2.5 million) is provided for in the
consolidated financial statements.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Short Term Debt and Interest

On December 30, 2011, Ivanhoe entered into a loan agreement with ICFL, a company wholly owned by Robert Friedland, for $10.0 million (ICFL Loan). The funds were advanced on
January 3, 2012 and bear interest at a rate of 10.0% per annum. On March 14, 2012, the loan agreement was amended to provide that, at ICFLs option, the outstanding principal may be converted into 10,484,375 common shares of the
Company at a price of Cdn$0.96 per common share. The principal balance matures on March 31, 2013, or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events.

In March 2012, the Company entered into a one year credit agreement with UBS Securities LLC for a $50.0 million loan (UBS Loan). At June 30, 2012, the Company had drawn $30.0 million of
principal on the UBS Loan, as reflected in the above table. Subsequent to quarter end, Ivanhoe elected to draw an additional $20.0 million of principal in July 2012. Borrowed amounts bear interest at one month Libor plus 10% for the first six months
of the loan and escalate by 1% per month thereafter. Interest is payable monthly.

Long Term Debt and Interest

In June 2011, the Company issued Convertible Debentures, which mature on June 30, 2016. The Convertible Debentures bear interest at an annual rate of
5.75%, payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 of each year.

Zitong Appraisal Program

The terms of the Supplementary Agreement to the Contract for Exploration, Development and Production in Zitong Block, Sichuan Basin with CNPC call for the
completion of an appraisal program by the end of June 2014. The work program consists of a 160 square kilometer seismic acquisition program, as well as drilling and completing three horizontal wells on the Guan and Wen structures.

Ecuador Drilling Program

At the end of
February 2012, the Company began drilling the IP-17 exploration well to test both the Hollin and pre-cretaceous structures in the southern part of Block 20. Commitments associated with the well total $5.2 million.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

Decommissioning Provisions

The Company is required to remedy the effect of our activities on the environment at our operating sites by dismantling and removing production facilities and remediating any damage caused. At
June 30, 2012, Ivanhoe estimated the total undiscounted, inflated cost to settle its asset retirement obligations in Canada, for the FTF in the US and in Ecuador was $3.5 million. These costs are expected to be incurred in 2013, 2029 and 2038,
respectively. Ivanhoe does not make such a provision for decommissioning costs in connection with its oil and gas operations in China as dry holes are abandoned as they occur and productive wells will not be abandoned while the Company has an
economic interest in the field.

Leases

The Company has long term leases for office space and vehicles, which expire between 2012 and 2017.

Other

Should Ivanhoe receive government and other approvals necessary to develop the
northern border of one of the Tamarack Project leases, the Company will be required to make a cash payment to Talisman of up to Cdn$15.0 million, as a contingent, final payment for the 2008 acquisition of the Tamarack Project leases.

From time to time, Ivanhoe enters into consulting agreements whereby a success fee may be payable if and when either a definitive agreement is signed or
certain other contractual milestones are met. Under the agreements, the consultant may receive cash, common shares, stock options or some combination thereof. Similarly, agreements entered into by the Company may contain cancellation fees or
liquidated damages provisions for early termination. These fees are not considered to be material.

The Company may provide indemnities
to third parties, in the ordinary course of business, that are customary in certain commercial transactions, such as purchase and sale agreements. The terms of these indemnities will vary based upon the contract, the nature of which prevents Ivanhoe
from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amounts that may be required to be paid. The Companys management is of the opinion that any resulting settlements relating to indemnities are not likely to be material.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to legal proceedings being brought against it. While the final outcome of these proceedings is
uncertain, the Company believes that these proceedings, in the aggregate, are not reasonably likely to have a material effect on its financial position or earnings.

Sources and Uses of Cash

The Companys cash flows from operating, investing and
financing activities, as reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, are summarized in the following table:



|                                      |  |                             |         |   |                           |  |         |      |  |  |         |   |  |  |         |  
|------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------- |  | ------- | ---- |  |  | ------- | - |  |  | ------- | -
|                                      |  | Three months
ended June 30, |         |   | Six months
ended June 30, | 
|                                      |  | 2012                        |         |   | 2011                      |  |         | 2012 |  |  | 2011    |  
|Cash used in operating activities     |  |                             | (4,184  | ) |                           |  | (6,455  | )    |  |  | (11,076 | ) |  |  | (13,464 | )
|Cash used in investing activities     |  |                             | (10,598 | ) |                           |  | (16,639 | )    |  |  | (15,762 | ) |  |  | (28,123 | )
|Cash provided by financing activities |  |                             |        |   |                           |  | 72,945  |      |  |  | 37,282  |   |  |  | 102,740 |  

Ivanhoes cash flow from operating activities is not sufficient to meet its operating and capital obligations over
the next twelve months. The Company intends to use its working capital to meet its commitments. However, additional sources of funding will be required to advance the Companys major projects and fully develop its oil and gas properties.
Historically, Ivanhoe has used external sources of funding such as public and private equity, debt markets and joint venture partners. However, there is no assurance that these sources of funding will be available to the Company in the future or
available on acceptable terms.

Operating Activities

In the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, cash used in operating activities was less than in 2011 as a result of higher revenue and reduced G&A costs.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

Investing Activities

Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures

Exploration and evaluation
capital expenditures for the Company in the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $19.5 million. In China, Ivanhoe expended $9.5 million on a 160 square kilometer 3-D seismic program at Zitong. In Canada, the regulatory approval process for
the Tamarack Project continued to progress and expenditures of $0.6 million were incurred to support the regulatory process. Expenditures of $9.4 million were incurred in connection with drilling of the IP-17 exploration well in the southern part of
Block 20 in Ecuador.

In the first half of 2012, exploration and evaluation capital expenditures totaled $28.1 million. In
China, Ivanhoe expended $10.1 million on the seismic program at Zitong, expenditures to support the regulatory process at Tamarack were $2.8 million and costs incurred in connection with drilling of the IP-17 exploration well in the southern part of
Block 20 in Ecuador totaled $15.2 million.

Property, Plant and Equipment Expenditures

In the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, property, plant and equipment additions totaled $5.1 million and $5.5 million,
respectively. The Company drilled two wells, completed one well and continued its fracture stimulation program at Dagang in the second quarter of 2012.

Financing Activities

In the first half of 2012, Ivanhoe received financing of $37.3
million, net of transaction costs, to support liquidity. Pursuant to an unsecured loan agreement signed in late 2011, the Company received $10.0 million from ICFL in January 2012. In March 2012, the Company established a $50.0 million short-term
secured credit facility with UBS Securities LLC. The loan consists of an initial tranche of $30.0 million and includes an accordion feature to increase the total amount by up to an additional $20.0 million.

Capital Structure



|                     |  |              |         |  |                  |  |         | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------ | ------- |  | ---------------- |  | ------- | 
|As at                |  | June 30,2012 |         |  | December 31,2011 | 
|Debt                 |  |              | 38,348  |  |                  |  |        | 
|Long term debt       |  |              | 62,235  |  |                  |  | 61,892  | 
|Shareholders equity |  |              | 300,941 |  |                  |  | 314,137 | 

At June 30, 2012, Ivanhoes market capitalization was less than the carrying value of the
Companys assets. Management does not consider this to be determinative that an impairment exists as there are factors which should be considered when interpreting Ivanhoes recent trading price, such as the Companys low trading
volumes, industry influences including commodity price concerns and larger macro-economic factors that have created an overall malaise in the capital and economic markets. Management does not believe the full value of the Companys oil and gas
assets or HTLTMtechnology is reflected in Ivanhoes
current stock price. On May 24, 2012, the Company received a notification from the Listing Qualifications Department of the NASDAQ Stock Market ("Nasdaq") notifying the Company that the Company did not meet the minimum bid price requirements
set forth in the Nasdaq Listing Rules. For additional information, refer to the Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2012.

Ivanhoe intends to use
its cash and cash equivalent balance to fulfill its commitments and partially fund operations in 2012. Cash flow may be insufficient to meet operating requirements in the next twelve months and additional sources of funding, either at a parent
company level or at a project level, will be required to grow the Companys major projects and fully develop its oil and gas properties. Historically, Ivanhoe has used external sources of funding, such as public and private equity, debt markets
and joint venture partners. Ivanhoe intends to finance its future funding requirements through a combination of strategic investors, joint venture partnerships, public and private debt and equity markets, either at a parent company level or at the
project level, and through the sale of interests in existing oil and gas properties. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such financing, or obtain it on favorable terms, and any future equity issuances may be dilutive to
current investors. If Ivanhoe cannot secure additional financing, the Company may have to delay its capital programs and forfeit or dilute its rights in existing oil and gas property interests.



27



---

##### Table of Contents

Outlook

In China, implementation of the previously announced transaction to assign its interest in the Production Sharing Contract for the Zitong block in Chinas Sichuan Basin to Shell China Exploration
continues to advance. Closing is expected to occur once all the necessary approvals have been obtained. Management anticipates receiving the necessary approvals during the third quarter but can give no assurance as to when such approvals will
actually be given.

In Canada, the regulatory approval process for the Tamarack project is continuing to progress. The Company has been
working with regulators to answer technical questions and with local area stakeholders to address their specific areas of interest. Responses to the regulators second round of Supplemental Information Requests were submitted on July 6,
2012. The Company continues to anticipate receiving regulatory approval by the end of 2012. Project advancement, as currently envisaged, is subject to regulatory approval and financing.

In Ecuador, Management is in discussions with a potential strategic partner to establish a financial participation arrangement for Block 20. The Companys objective is to finalize and implement these
arrangements by the end of 2012. While Management is encouraged by the progress made to date, any potential arrangement remains subject to Ecuadorian Government approval and continued commercial negotiations such that Management can give no
assurance that such arrangements will ultimately be established.

Ivanhoe continues to focus its HTLTMcommercialization efforts on establishing midstream partnerships and
business development activities for several projects in Latin America.

Managements plans for financing future expenditures include
traditional project financing, debt and mezzanine financing, the sale of non-current assets or the sale of equity securities as well as the potential for alliances or other arrangements with strategic partners. However, no assurances can be given
that Ivanhoe will be able to enter into one or more strategic business alliances with third parties or that the Company will be able to sell non-core assets on acceptable terms or raise sufficient additional capital. If the Company is unable to
enter into such business alliances or obtain adequate additional financing, the Company may be required to curtail its operations, which may include the sale or abandonment of assets.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There has been no material change in the Companys assessment of its sensitivity to market risk since its presentation set forth in Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk in the 2011 Form 10-K.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Companys management, including its Executive Chairman and its Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2012. Based upon this evaluation, management concluded that these controls and procedures were (1) designed
to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to the Companys Executive Chairman and its Chief Financial Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure and (2) effective, in that they
provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms.

It should be noted that while the Companys Executive Chairman and its Chief Financial Officer believe that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures provide a reasonable level of assurance that they are effective, they do not expect that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will
prevent all errors and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting in the quarter ended June 30, 2012, that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On July 12, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit against the Company and related parties that had been filed on November 20, 2008 in
the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The plaintiffs in the case are Jack J. Grynberg and three affiliated companies. The recent ruling from the Tenth Circuit affirms the district courts judgment dismissing the case
without prejudice. The Court of Appeals has denied plaintiffs request for rehearing, but has not yet issued a mandate, which would finally conclude the current appellate proceeding.

The suit alleged bribery and other misconduct and challenged the propriety of a contract awarded to the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary Ivanhoe Energy Ecuador Inc. to develop Ecuadors
Pungarayacu heavy oil field. The plaintiffs claims were for unspecified damages or ownership of the Companys interest in the Pungarayacu field. The Company and related defendants filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of
jurisdiction. The district court granted the motion and dismissed the case without prejudice. The district court also granted Mr. Robert Friedlands request to sanction plaintiffs and plaintiffs counsel for their conduct related to
bringing the suit by awarding Mr. Friedland fees and costs. The Ivanhoe corporate defendants, including the Company, also have been awarded costs and fees as the prevailing parties in the trial court.

The Court of Appeals July 12, 2012 order affirmed the district courts judgment and related orders. The Court of Appeals also concluded
that the Ivanhoe Corporate defendants, including the Company, are entitled to fees and costs they incurred on appeal. The Court of Appeals remanded the case to the district court for the limited purpose of computing a proper award of appellate fees
and costs.

On December 30, 2010, the Company received a demand for arbitration from GAR Energy and Associates, Inc. (GAR
Energy) and Gonzalo A. Ruiz and Janis S. Ruiz as successors in interest to, and assignees of, GAR Energy. GAR Energy subsequently abandoned its demand for arbitration and filed suit against the Company and subsidiaries in the Superior Court
for Kern County, California on March 11, 2011. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, fraud and other misconduct arising from a consulting agreement and various other agreements between GAR Energy and the Company relating to the Pungarayacu
heavy oil field. The plaintiffs seek actual damages of $250,000 and a portion of the Companys interest in the Pungarayacu field. The plaintiffs seek other miscellaneous relief, including requests for a declaration of some of the parties
rights and legal relations under a consulting agreement, attorneys' fees and certain litigation costs and expenses, disgorgement of the Company's past, current and/or future profits attributable to the Pungarayacu field and certain other fields in
Ecuador, tort damages and exemplary and punitive damages, the imposition of constructive trusts over certain amounts and profits requested by the plaintiffs, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. The Company removed the case to the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of California and all of the defendants have answered and filed counterclaims for attorneys fees. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss certain claims and to compel arbitration of others.
Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand the case to state court. On December 23, 2011, the Magistrate Judge denied plaintiffs motion to remand and issued findings and recommendations that would send all of the parties and all of the
claims to arbitration should the district court Judge assigned to the case adopt them. On January 19, 2012 the district court Judge adopted the Magistrate Judges findings and recommendations in full, ordered the parties to arbitration and
stayed the district court proceedings to allow for the completion of the arbitration. The arbitration is in the early stages of proceeding. The likelihood of loss or gain resulting from this dispute, and the estimated amount of ultimate loss or
gain, are not determinable or reasonably estimable at this time.

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS

Ivanhoe is exposed in varying degrees to normal market risks inherent in the oil and gas industry, including commodity price risk, foreign currency
exchange rate risk, credit risk, interest rate risk and liquidity risk. The Company recognizes these risks and manages its operations to minimize the exposure to the extent practicable. There have not been any significant changes to the
Companys exposure to risks, or processes to manage these risks as described in the Companys 2011 Form 10-K, except as noted below:

Interest Rate Risk

As at June 30,
2012, the Company had borrowed $30.0 million under the UBS Loan. Subsequent to quarter end, the Company elected to draw an additional $20.0 million of principal in July 2012. Borrowed amounts incur interest at a rate of one month Libor plus 10% for
the first six months and escalate by 1% per month thereafter. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose Ivanhoe to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, the Companys debt service obligations on the variable interest rate
indebtedness would increase, even though the amount borrowed remained the same, and the Companys net loss would increase. The Companys goal is to minimize its interest expense; however, the Company does not anticipate using hedging
contracts in 2012 to manage its interest rate risk.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

If the interest rate on the UBS Loan were to increase by 1%, the Companys net loss would increase by
approximately $25,000 per month. Accordingly, an increase in interest rates from current levels could cause the Companys annual debt service obligations to increase significantly.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS



|               |  |                                                                                                       
|-------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit Number |  | Description of Document                                                                               
|               | 
|31.1           |  | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|               | 
|31.2           |  | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|               | 
|32.1           |  | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|               | 
|32.2           |  | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereto duly authorized.



|                    |  |                           
|------------------- |  | --------------------------
|IVANHOE ENERGY INC.
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/ Gerald D. Schiefelbein
|                    |  | Gerald D. Schiefelbein    
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer   

Date: August 9, 2012



30