alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHIEF JUSTICE

 CAROLYN WRIGHT

JUSTICES

 DAVID L. BRIDGES

 MOLLY FRANCIS

 DOUGLAS S. LANG

 ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

 ROBERT M. FILLMORE

 LANA MYERS

 DAVID EVANS

 DAVID LEWIS

 ADA BROWN

 CRAIG STODDART

 BILL WHITEHILL

 DAVID J. SCHENCK

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75202

(214) 712-3400

LISA MATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712-3450

lisa.matz@5th.txcourts.gov

GAYLE HUMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

(214) 712-3434

gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov

FACSIMILE

(214) 745-1083

INTERNET

HTTP://5TH.TXCOURTS.GOV

December 10, 2015

Shelly T. Greco

Eberstein & Witherite, LLP

3100 Monticello Ave., Suite 500

Dallas, TX 75205

Vanessa Rosa

Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP

700 N. Pearl St., 25th Floor

Dallas, TX 75201

Re: Matthew Goggans v. Tonia Marie Ford; 05-14-01239-CV

Dear Attorneys:

Enclosed is corrected page 2 for the above-mentioned case. Please note the following typographical 

error, which has been corrected: 

At the bottom of page 2 the word sufficient has been changed to insufficient.

Please replace pages 2, of your previous copy with the enclosed.

Sincerely,

Lisa Matz

Clerk of the Court

cc: Trial court judge

Trial court clerk
1337 Massachusetts Avenue # 2 1 3 Arlington, MA 02476

Tel : +1 972 415 6372 Fax: +1 503 218 6565 president@unaa.org May 20, 2015

Secretary John F. Kerry US Department of State 2201 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20520

Secretary Anthony Foxx Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, 9th Floor Washington, DC 20590

Secretary Penny S

. Pritzker Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230

Re: Comment dockets DOS

– 2015

– 0016
, DOT

– OST

– 2015

– 0082 and DOC

- 2015

- 0001

- 0001

Dear Secretary Kerry, Secretary Foxx
, and Secretary Pritzker:

On behalf of t he Ugandan North American Association (UNAA) and our 120,000 members nationwide , I am writing to urge you to continue supporting our current Open Skies agreements with our Gulf States allies and not reopen Open Skies negotiations.

The members of the UNAA depe nd upon the access to African countries afforded by our Open Skies agreement with
t he UAE and Qatar . W e are concerned that unnecessarily re negotiat ing th is treat y will jeopardize our access , and diminish our close cultural connections

, to countries like Uganda

. The Gulf State carriers travel routes are traditionally underserved by U.S. carriers. Without our Gulf State carriers, it would be even more difficult, expensive and time consuming for millions of U.S. residents , and most notably members of our com munity, to do business or visit friends and family in their native countries. The economic value of this expanded access for our community and region should be commended and not reprimanded.

We urge you to seriously consider our request to maintain our c urrent Open Skies agreements to ensure our economic and cultural livelihood remains intact.
Thank you for taking the time to review our concerns.

Sincerely,

Brian M. Kwesiga President and CEO

, Ugandan North American Association

– UNAA
NO T F O R P UB LICATIO N IN W EST' S HAWAI # I REP O RTS AND P ACIF IC REP O RTER

NOS. CAAP-18-0000740 AND CAAP-18-0000701 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I ALLY BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. JOHN HOCHROTH,Defendant-Appellant,

andSABINA MYOHYUNG HOCHROTH, aka SABINA MYOH YUNG HOCHROTH; ISLAND HOME MORTGAGE, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees,

and JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE C ORPORATIONS 1-20; DOE ENTITIES 1-20; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-20, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 16-1-0313)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEALS (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, and Chan and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon consideration of the "Stipulation for Dismissal of 1) Appeal Filed September 27, 2018 in CAAP-18-0000740 and 2) Appeal Filed September 7, 2018 in CAAP-18-0000701 Consolidated on December 28, 2018" ( Stipulation for Dismissal ), filed on July 29, 2020, and the records and files herein, it appears that (1) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant John Hochroth and Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee Ally Bank (collectively, the Parties ) seek to dismiss the identified appeals with prejudice pursuant to Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b), (2) the Stipulation for Dismissal is signed by counsel for the Parties to the appeals, and (3) the Parties agree to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Therefore, Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000740 11-AUG-2020 08:49 AMNO T F O R P UB LICATIO N IN W EST' S HAWAI # I REP O RTS AND P ACIF IC REP O RTER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation for Dismissal, filed on July 29, 2020, is approved and the appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees on appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 11, 2020.
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge
/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

2
#### Terry Lenn CLAWITTER v. A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, and ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

CR 85-11

689 S.W.2d 558

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered May 20, 1985

*Bennie O’Neil,*for appellant.

*Steve Clark,*Att’y Gen., by: *Theodore*Holder, Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Terry Len Clawitter, who was sentenced as a habitual offender to a term of imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction, was determined by the Department to be ineligible for parole under Act 93 of 1977, Ark. Stat. Ann. §43-2828,43-2829 (Repl. 1977/Supp. 1983), until he served three-fourths of his sentence with credit for good time. *132Appellant challenged the Department’s determination regarding his parole eligibility in a petition for writ of mandamus in which he asked the trial court to enter a declaratory judgment ordering the Department not to compute his parole eligibility in accordance with Act 93. He contended that Act 93 violates Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-105 (Repl. 1977) and the constitutional provision against double jeopardy. Appellant did not question the validity of the sentences imposed upon him. The trial court denied the petition and appellant brings this appeal.

Pursuant to *Anders*v. *California,*386 U.S. 738 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to be relieved and a brief stating there is no merit to the appeal. Appellant was notified of his right to file a *pro se*brief within 30 days. *See*Rules of the Supreme Court, Rule 11(h), Ark. Stat. Ann. Vol. 3A (Supp. 1983). He did not file a brief. The State concurs that the appeal has no merit.

Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-105 (Repl. 1977), which prescribes the method of prosecution when conduct constitutes more than one offense, embodies protections against double jeopardy found in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article II, Section VIII of the Arkansas Constitution. Appellant argued that § 41-105 was violated on the ground that Act 93 imposed another punishment beyond that imposed by the trial court. Denial of parole, however, is not a new punishment. As the court said in *Roach*v. *Board of Pardons & Paroles, State of Arkansas,*503 F.2d 1367, 1368 (8th Cir. 1974):

> . . . parole is a supervised release from incarceration prior to the termination of sentence. Conversely, the denial of parole has the effect of perpetuating the status quo, i.e., continued incarceration during the term of sentence. Therefore, such denial does not give rise to multiple punishment for the same offense. *United States ex rel. Jacobs*v. *Barc,*141 F.2d 480 (6th Cir. 1944), *cert. denied,*322 U.S. 751, 64 S. Ct. 1262, 88 L.Ed. 1581; *Carlisle*v. *Besinger,*355 F. Supp. 1359, 1363 (D.C. Ill. 1973).

Appellant was not placed in double jeopardy by the application of Act 93 to his sentence.

From a review of the record and briefs before this Court, we find the appeal to be without merit. Accordingly, counsel’s *133motion to be relieved is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Calvin L. Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 12th day of October, 2010.








CALVIN L. KANTONENCalvin L. KantonenChief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

SHANDRA FORSHA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-750

NOTICE OF REMOVAL

1. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, Defendant Aaron Joseph Schneider, M.D., is 

removing to this Court a civil action originally filed in the Court of Common Pleas of 

Warren County, Ohio. 

2. On October 6, 2017, Plaintiff Shandra Forsha filed a document titled 

“Complaint” in the Warren County Court of Common Pleas. A copy of the complaint 

is attached as Exhibit A. Defendant Aaron Joseph Schneider was served and filed 

an answer on October 18, 2017.

3. This action is removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). Defendant 

Aaron Joseph Schneider is an employee and officer of the United States of America 

and was acting within the scope of his federal employment with regard to the 

allegations made in Plaintiff’s Complaint.

4. On November 2, 2017, Benjamin C. Glassman, the United States 

Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, certified that Aaron Joseph Schneider

Case: 1:17-cv-00750-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/08/17 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 1
2

was acting within the scope of his employment and office as an employee of the 

United States Government at the time of the incidents out of which Plaintiff’s

claims arose. The Court is respectfully referred to the Certification of Scope of 

Employment, attached as Exhibit B to this Notice.

5. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(2), this action may be removed at any 

time before trial. Accordingly, this removal is timely. 

6. A copy of this Notice of Removal will be filed promptly with the Clerk 

of the Court of Common Pleas of Warren County, Ohio, which will effect the 

removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d).

7. A copy of the other Defendants’ answer from the state court 

proceedings is attached as Exhibit C. 

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN C. GLASSMAN

United States Attorney

s/Margaret A. Castro

MARGARET A. CASTRO (0078968)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

Aaron Joseph Schneider, M.D.

221 East Fourth Street, Suite 400

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Office: (513) 684-3711

Fax: (513) 684-6972

E-mail: Margaret.Castro@usdoj.gov

Case: 1:17-cv-00750-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/08/17 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 2
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on November 8, 2017, the foregoing Notice of Removal was 

presented to the Clerk of the Court for filing and uploading into the CM/ECF 

system, and I certify that on the same date a copy of the foregoing was sent by first 

class mail to:

Joseph W. Shea III, Esq.

SHEAHARTMANN LLP

300 Court Index Building

119 W. Central Parkway

Cincinnati, OH 45202-4119

Neil F. Freund, Esq. 

Shannon K. Bockelman, Esq. 

FREUND, FREEZE & ARNOLD 

Fifth Third Center

1 South Main Street, Suite 1800 

Dayton, OH 45402-2017

s/Margaret A. Castro

MARGARET A. CASTRO (0078968)

Assistant United States Attorney

Case: 1:17-cv-00750-SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/08/17 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 3
EXHIBIT 23.3

               Consent of Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers

     As independent petroleum engineers, Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers
hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
on Form S-3 of Magnum Hunter  Resources,  Inc. (the "Company") of all references
to our reports and our firm  included  in or made part of the  Company's  Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December  31, 1999.  This  registrations
statement on Form S-3 is to be filed on or about September 8, 2000.

/s/ Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers
Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers


Houston, Texas
September 8, 2000
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westergaard.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jinbiao Ding, chief executive officer of the Company, and Adam Wasserman, chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Jinbiao DingJinbiao Ding

Chief Executive Officer
 
 Date: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Adam WassermanAdam Wasserman

Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Headliners
Entertainment Group, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: August 21, 2006          /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                               ------------------------------------------
                               Eduardo Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer
                                and Chief Financial Office)
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Russell M. Medford, President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/RUSSELL
              M. MEDFORDRussell
                M. MedfordPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  November
                9, 2007

















**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark P. Colonnese, Executive Vice President,
      Commercial Operations and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/MARK
              P. COLONNESEMark
                P. ColonneseExecutive
                Vice President, Commercial Operationsand
                Chief Financial OfficerDate:  November
                9, 2007
### ~tate 

## of do**Jh~r5ell**

CHRIS CHRISTIE G01'ertlOr

KIM GUADAGNO

Lt. Governor DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 401 EAST STATE STREET P.O. Box 402 Trenton, N.J. 08625-0402 BOB MARTIN Conlmlssioner

December 9,2010

The HonorableJudith A. Enck Regional Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency

- Region 2 290 Broadway- 26th Floor New York, New York 10007-1866

DearRegional Administrator Enck:

Enclosed for your review and approval is a reVISIon to the New Jersey State Implementation Plan (SIP) to incorporate the recently adopted Sulfur in Fuels rule revision (NJ.A.C. 7:27-9). New Jersey previously committed to propose this measure in the State's regional haze and fine particulate matter SIP revisions. This adopted rule will reduce the sulfur content in all distillateheating oil (No.2 and lighter distillate fuel) to 500 parts permillion (ppm) by July 1,2014 and to 15 ppm by July 1,2016. The adopted rule will also reduce the sulfur content in No.4 fuel oil to a consistent 2,500 ppm throughout the State and reduce the sulfur content in No.5, No.6, and heavier fuel oil to 5,000ppm orless on July 1,2014.

The rule proposal for this amendment was published in the November 16, 2009 New Jersey Register at 41 NJ .R. 4156 and the rule adoption published in the September 20, 2010 New Jersey Register at 42 NJ.R. 2244. A copy ofthe Department's final rule adoption and public notice for the rule are enclosed. A summary ofthe comments received on the proposed rule amendments and SIP revision, as well as the Department's responses to those comments, is included as part ofthe enclosed adoption document.

Please be advised that New Jersey will be proposing a revision to this adopted rule to allow for an extension ofthe interim 500ppm standard deadline ifa refinery certifies that it has a planned turn-around ofthe refinery within I-year ofthe July 1, 2014 deadline. This extension would allow arefinery to avoid excess emissions from an additional shutdown and start-up ofthe refinery. We will provide you a copy of the proposed rule amendment for comment when available. New Jersey is not proposing any change to the stringency or date to comply with the final sulfur content in distillate fuel standard of 15 ppm on July 1, 2016.We are requesting your approval ofthese SIP revisions to contain New Jersey's revised Sulfur in Fuels rule. Ifyou have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact meorWilliam O'SuIlivan, Director ofthe Division ofAir Quality, at (609) 984-1484. 

# Sij'elY YOU>/ 

# /!;J;

# r
j. lriob Martin Commissioner

Enclosures: 1. List ofpublicnotice actions taken bythe Department 2. Copies ofthe newspaper legal advertisements and affidavits ofpublication 3. Copyofthe proposal, as published in the New Jersey Register 4. Copyofthe adoption, as published in the New Jersey Register

c: NancyWittenberg, Assistant Commissionerw/o enclosures William O'Sullivan, Directorw/o enclosures Ray Werner, USEPA w/enclosures

Nell' '/ersey is all Equal Opportunity Employer, Printed Oil Recvcled PaperalldRecvclable
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

 

Byron T. Hurst, Sr., 

Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 3:17-cv-356 

v. Judge Thomas M. Rose 

 Mag. Judge Michael J. Newman 

Department of Veterans Affairs, et al., 

Defendants. 

DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, (ECF 5), AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

OBJECTIONS. (ECF 6). 

This case is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman’s Report and 

Recommendations, (ECF 5), Objection of Plaintiff Byron T. Hurst, Sr. (ECF 6). The Report and 

Recommendation suggests dismissing Plaintiff’s employment discrimination claim for failure to 

promptly seek administrative remedies. Plaintiff’s objection confirms that his E.E.O.C. 

complaint was late. 

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has 

made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that the 

objection, (ECF 6), is not well taken and is hereby DENIED. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS IN 

FULL the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendations, (ECF 5), and TERMINATES the 

instant case from the dockets of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, 

Western Division at Dayton. 
2 

DONE and ORDERED this Friday, January 19, 2018. 

 

s/Thomas M. Rose 

 ________________________________ 

THOMAS M. ROSE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spear & Jackson, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis
Crowley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15
      (d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Dennis Crowley
----------------

Dennis Crowley
Chief Executive Officer

March 8, 2004
#### ALPHA CONTROLS ENGINEERING, Inc., et al *v.*FLAGMASTER, Inc.

74-103

514 S.W. 2d 223

Opinion delivered October 7, 1974

*Pearson & Woodruff, for appellants.*

*76
      *Paul Jameson*and *Charles W. Atkinson,*for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Our Supreme Court Rule 9 (d) provides, among other things, that the appellants provide an abstract of the record as is necessary to an understanding of all questions presented to us for decision. The Rules of the Supreme Court are to be found in Ark. Stat. Ann., Vol. 3A, 1962 Replacement, beginning at page 102 of the 1973 pocket supplement.

This case is affirmed for failure to comply with the recited portion of Rule 9 (d). The trial court entered a detailed judgment consisting of four pages. The judgment sets out many specific findings of facts and conclusions of law covering the numerous facets of the case. (The case was tried to the court without a jury.) Appellant’s abstract of the judgment consists of ten lines which actually is an abstract only of the last paragraph of the court’s judgment. An abstract of all the specific findings of the court is necessary to an understanding of the issues to be decided.

We do not consider our action unduly harsh because a majority of the court would have affirmed on the merits had they been reached.

Affirmed.