alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Dendreon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: October 10, 2006



/s/ Mitchell H. Gold, M.D.Name:

Mitchell H. Gold, M.D.Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Richard F. Hamm, Jr.Name:

Richard F. Hamm, Jr.Title:

Senior Vice President, CorporateDevelopment,General Counsel and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and will be
retained by Headliners Entertainment Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: November 14, 2005           /s/ Eduardo Rodriguez
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Eduardo Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer)
exv10w1












Exhibit 10.1



Resolution of Board of Directors, February 26, 2010, establishing compensation for non-management
directors




Proposed Piedmont Director Compensation Structure




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Pay Component	 	Amount
	Annual Board Retainer
	 	$ 28,000	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Board Meeting Fee
	 	$   1,500	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Committee Meeting Fee
	 	$   1,500	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Independent Lead Director Fee
(additional
annual retainer)
	 	$ 10,000	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Audit:
	 	$	8,000	 
	 	 	Compensation:
	 	$	5,000	 
	 	 	Directors & Corporate
Governance:
	 	$	5,000	 
	 	 	Benefits:
	 	$	2,500	 
	Committee Chair Retainer	 	Finance:
	 	$	2,500	 
	Annual Equity Grant†	 	$35,000 (2010), $40,000 (2011)
	 	 	 	 
	Initial Election Equity Grant
†
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	(one-time grant
for directors elected subsequent to
August
20, 2003)
	 	$15,500	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





(Exclusive of the 25% stock match when the Director takes all of his or her retainers and
attendance fees in the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.)






 




			
	†	 	Paid in the form of a cash contribution to the directors’ Dividend Reinvestment
and Stock Purchase Plan accounts.





          THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the Board hereby approves the new Board member
compensation structure set forth above, to be effective March 1, 2010.
#### Champion Eslow and another v. The Township of Albion and another.

*Equity pleading and practice: Orders nunc pro tunc: Proofs taken without authority.*It is not within the purview of an order *nunc pro turn:*to operate *ex post facto*to give force to a chamber order which was void for want of jurisdiction, or to give validity to proofs taken in a chancery-cause without authority of law under such void order.

*Heard and decided June 10.*

Appeal in Chancery from Calhoun Circuit.

The defendants having elected after this cause was at issue, to have the witnesses examined in open court, and having given the requisite notice therefor, the complainants procured an order at chambers that instead of the trial in open court the proofs should be taken before a commissioner. Proofs were so taken and the case proceeded to final decree, and -was then appealed to this court. — See *27 Mich., 4.*It was there held that the judge had no power to make such an order at chambers; that the proofs taken were without authority and must be stricken out, and that the decree was premature; and the cause was remanded. Complainants’ counsel thereupon procured from the court below an order in open court, of like import, to be entered *nunc pro tunc,*as of the date of the chamber order aforesaid, so as to save the' testimony before taken. The court below heard the cause upon the proofs already taken, and entered a decree dismissing the bill. Complainants appealed.

*Frank G. Holmes*and *G. V. 27. Lothrop,*for defendants, moved to strike the testimony from the files.

*Brown .& Patterson,*for complainants, *contra.*

The Couet

held that it was not within purview of an order *nunc pro tunc*to operate *ex post facto*to give force to • such chamber order, which was void for want of jurisdic*194tion; or to give validity to the proofs taken without authority of law under it; and that the case stood, therefore, with no valid evidence before the court.

Decree below modified so as to dismiss the bill without prejudice, and otherwise affirmed.
Case: 1:17-cr-00096-SJD-MRM Doc #: 114 Filed: 11/13/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 502
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) forthe year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul McFeeters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adoptedpursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: September 12, 2006
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeanne Prayther, the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Daleen
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
     "Form 10-K"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 28, 2003


/s/ JEANNE PRAYTHER
-------------------------
Jeanne Prayther
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Daleen Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Daleen
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### In the matter of Charles D. Stephenson.

*-Affidavit for capias: Jurisdictional defects: Waiver: Special bail.*Jurisdictional defects in an affidavit for a *capias*are not waived by putting in special bail and pleading in tlie cause.

*Affidavit: Actions arising upon contract: Statute construed: Capias: Arrest.*An affidavit for a capias, which sets out a claim against the defendant by reason of his having, ás superintendent of a railroad company, collected moneys belonging to the company and failed'on demand to account for and pay over the same, makes out a case of an action “arising upon contract” within the meaning of that phrase as used in the statute *(Comp. L. 1871,*§ *578U)',*and the cause of action thus set out not being one of those enumerated by the statute as alone authorized to be commenced by capias, an arrest on a *capias*issued on such an affidavit is unwarranted and illegal.

*Heard and decided April 29.*

*Habeas corpus*and *Certiorari.*

The prisoner was held by the sheriff of Van Burén county by virtue of his surrender by his special bail in an action commenced by *capias*by tbe Paw Paw railroad company against said Stephenson, and now pending in tbe Van Burén circuit. The case made by the affidavit on which the *capias*issued was that 'Stephenson as superintendent of the *61plaintiff company bad collected large sums of money belonging to tbe company wliicb be bad failed to account for and pay over on demand. Tbe defendant had appeared in the-canse by putting in special bail, and bad also pleaded-to tbe declaration. He was afterwards delivered over in exoneration of bis bail.

*Alfred J. Mills,*for petitioner.

*Arthur Brown, contra.*

The Coubt

held that tbe putting in special bail and pleading in tbe canse did not operate as a waiver of jurisdictional' defects in tbe affidavit which is tbe basis of tbe origina! arrest; that tbe case made by tbe affidavit in question is one of an action “arising upon contract” within the meaning of that phrase as used in tbe statute *(Clomp. L. 1871,*§ *5734),*and not being one of those actions there enumerated as alone authorized to be commenced by *capias,*that the arrest and imprisonment was unwarranted and illegal.

Prisoner discharged.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annualreport of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fredric N. Eshelman, ChiefExecutive Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;and 

 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

 

Date: February 18, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

ROBERT BRANDES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-607

Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. 

Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 9)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to 

United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the 

Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on August 13, 2018, 

submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 9). Plaintiff filed objections 

(“Objections”). (Doc. 10).1

 

 1 The Objections are not well-taken. The Objections’ argument that Dr. Swedberg’s testimony, 

and the findings of Dr. Mikalov and Dr. Stroebel, mandate a finding that Plaintiff is limited to 

sedentary work fails for the reasons asserted on pages 5-8 of the Report and Recommendation. 

The Objections’ argument that the Magistrate Judge should have found a “closed period of 

disability” from 2013 until December, 2015, when Plaintiff lost 100 pounds, fails because, as the 

Magistrate Judge correctly explained, the consultants on whose opinions the ALJ most relied 

reviewed the entirety of the record, including the period when Plaintiff was at his heaviest, but 

still found Plaintiff to be capable of light work. (Doc. 9 at 9). The Objections’ argument 

regarding Plaintiff’s subjective complaints is not availing; the Court agrees with the Magistrate 

Judge that Plaintiff has not demonstrated error in the ALJ’s evaluation of Plaintiff’s subjective 

complaints. (Doc. 9 at 9-12). Accordingly, the Objections are OVERRULED. 
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 

of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its 

entirety. Accordingly: 

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED; 

2. The Objections (Doc. 10) are OVERRULED; 

3. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED; and

4. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

9/25/18
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 51
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 2 of 10 PAGEID #: 52
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 3 of 10 PAGEID #: 53
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 4 of 10 PAGEID #: 54
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 5 of 10 PAGEID #: 55
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 6 of 10 PAGEID #: 56
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 7 of 10 PAGEID #: 57
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 8 of 10 PAGEID #: 58
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 9 of 10 PAGEID #: 59
Case: 1:17-cv-00764-SJD-KLL Doc #: 4 Filed: 01/05/18 Page: 10 of 10 PAGEID #: 60
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Railroad Administration

          - [Docket Number FRA-2006-24812] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Railroad Administration, Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On April 3, 2015 (80 FR 18292), the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) provided notice of a public hearing to receive views, data, and comments regarding BNSF Railway's (BNSF) petition for modification and extension of its waiver of compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety regulations contained in title 49 Code of Federal Regulations part 232, Brake System Safety Standards for Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains and Equipment, in Docket Number FRA-2006-24812. The notice contained an incorrect date of the public hearing.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Steve Zuiderveen, Railroad Safety Specialist, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6337,                         *Steven.Zuiderveen@dot.gov.*      ( print page 21298)    

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 3, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-07656, on page 18292, in the second column, correct the paragraph to read:                    

In addition, FRA is extending the comment period for this waiver petition to June 21, 2015, to allow adequate time for any additional comments to be submitted following the public hearing on May 21, 2015.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 11, 2015.

Ron Hynes,

Director, Office of Technical Oversight.

[FR Doc. 2015-08938 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50802 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE AVELINO LUIS-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Flaco Luis, also known as Jose Avelino Luis, also known as Joe Avelino Luis, also known as Jose Luis, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-14-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Avelino Luis-Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  U-SHIP, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

                                                          For the Year Ended June 30,
                                                          ---------------------------
                                                             1996           1997
                                                          ---------      ---------
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>      
Weighted average number of issued shares outstanding      1,973,295      4,172,862

Effect of cheap stock:
  Common shares canceled during 1996 (1)                   (200,000)            --
  Dilutive effect of cheap stock after application
     of treasury stock method (1)                           157,491             --
                                                          ---------      ---------


Shares outstanding used to compute net loss per share     1,930,786      4,172,862
                                                        ===========    ===========


Net Loss                                                ($2,184,287)   ($2,527,918)
                                                        ===========    ===========


Net Loss Per Common share                               ($     1.13)   ($     0.61)
                                                        ===========    ===========


</TABLE>


(1)      Cheap stock and common shares cancelled during the past year are
         included in the computation for all periods presented in accordance
         with Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 4 (D).

September 25, 1997
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; NRSA Individual Fellowship (F30, 
F31, F32) Review Panel.
    Date: February 23, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Luis Espinoza, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Extramural Project Review Branch, Office of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, Room 2109, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-8599, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 4, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-00136 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```