alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-3943

___________

Sandra L. Dunbar, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 7, 2001

 Filed: March 12, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sandra Dunbar appeals the district court's1 judgment in favor of defendant

following a bench trial in her wrongful-death suit. After careful consideration of the

arguments in Dunbar’s brief, we conclude that the district court’s judgment should be

affirmed. Dunbar fails to direct us to anything in the record which would show that the

district court erred in entering judgment against her after finding no evidence of
-2-

negligence. See United States v. Wicker, 80 F.3d 263, 268 (8th Cir. 1996) (district

court’s findings as to credibility of witnesses are virtually unreviewable on appeal).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:13 AM

To: 'brad.a.meier@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Info rmation - Aerial Edge, Inc.

Mr. Brad Meier,

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 0579). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air) for the

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and

remove closed

‐ set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the

requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information

described above by 6/2/2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying

you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

SANDRA SCHUMPERT, 

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:17-cv-288

 

vs.

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

(Consent case)

Defendant.

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION

(DOC. 18) FOR AN AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 

(“EAJA”); AND (2) AWARDING EAJA ATTORNEY’S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES

IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,000.00

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ joint 

stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses

under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the total amount of 

$4,000.00. Doc. 18. There being no dispute that all requirements are met for the reasonable award 

of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties’ joint stipulation for an EAJA award (doc. 

18); and (2) AWARDS Plaintiff EAJA fees, costs, and expenses in the amount of $4,000.00. As 

no further matters remain pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s 

docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: July 17, 2018 s/ Michael J. Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge
NOTE TO FILE

DATE: March 15, 2016

SUBJECT: Change in Weblink for EPA Workshop on Background Ozone

Effective immediately, the weblink to the EPA Workshop on Background Ozone, held on February 24 

and 25, 2016, has been changed to the following: 

https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/epa-workshop-background-ozone-february-24-and-25-2016

All information pertaining to the Background Ozone White Paper and the February 2016 workshop has 

been moved to this new location. Please contact Yvonne W. Johnson, johnson.yvonnew@epa.gov, if 

there are any questions.
NUMBER 13-13-00204-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

NAN CANION, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Calhoun County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant's second unopposed motion for 

extension of time to file the brief. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on July 

15, 2013, and this Court has previously granted appellant an extension for the filing of 

appellant’s brief in this cause. Appellant has now filed a second motion requesting 
2

additional time to file the appellate brief in this cause.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's second motion for 

extension of time to file the brief and the extension previously granted in this cause, is of 

the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant's second motion for extension of time 

to file the brief should be granted with order. The Court, however, looks with disfavor 

upon the delay caused by counsel's failure to have filed a brief in this matter. 

Appellant's second motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby 

GRANTED, and the Honorable Leslie A. Werner, counsel for appellant, is hereby 

ORDERED to file the appellate brief with this Court on or before October 15, 2013. 

Further motions for extension of time will not be favorably entertained by the Court.

The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on the Honorable 

Leslie A. Werner by certified mail, return receipt requested.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

2nd day of October, 2013.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4270 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 

temporary provisions, including the sales tax deduction, the child credit, 

the repeal of the estate tax, the deduction for higher education expenses, 

and extending the current capital gains and dividend tax rates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2009 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent certain temporary provisions, including the 

sales tax deduction, the child credit, the repeal of the 

estate tax, the deduction for higher education expenses, 

and extending the current capital gains and dividend 

tax rates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Common Sense Tax 

5 Relief Act of 2009’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4270 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN EXPIRING PROVISIONS MADE PERMA2 NENT. 

3 (a) DEDUCTION FOR STATE AND LOCAL SALES

4 TAXES.—Paragraph (5) of section 164(b) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general sales tax) is 

6 amended by striking subparagraph (L). 

7 (b) CHILD CREDIT.—Section 901 of the Economic 

8 Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall 

9 not apply to section 201 of such Act (relating to modifica10 tions to child credit). 

11 (c) MARRIAGE PENALTY RELIEF.—Section 901 of 

12 the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 

13 of 2001 shall not apply to title III of such Act (relating 

14 to marriage penalty relief). 

15 (d) REPEAL OF ESTATE TAX.—Section 901 of the 

16 Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 

17 2001 shall not apply to title V of such Act (relating to 

18 estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer tax provi19 sions). 

20 (e) DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELE21 MENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.—Sub22 paragraph (D) of section 62(a)(2) of such Code is amend23 ed by striking ‘‘In the case of taxable years beginning dur24 ing 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, or 2009, 

25 the deductions’’ and inserting ‘‘The deductions’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4270 IH

1 (f) DEDUCTION FOR TUITION AND RELATED EX2 PENSES.— 

3 (1) Section 222 of such Code is amended by 

4 striking subsection (e) (relating to termination). 

5 (2) Section 901 of the Economic Growth and 

6 Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall not 

7 apply to section 431 of such Act (relating to deduc8 tion for higher education expenses). 

9 (g) CAPITAL GAINS AND DIVIDENDS RATE MADE

10 PERMANENT.—The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Rec11 onciliation Act of 2003 is amended by striking section 

12 303. 

13 (h) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

15 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
R. Patrick Thornberry 

Associate 

r.patrick.thornberry@FaegreBD.com 

Direct +1 317 569 4625 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP 

600 East 96th Street Suite 600 

Indianapolis Indiana 46240-3789 

Phone +1 317 569 9600 

Fax +1 317 569 4800

US.77790184.01

August 12, 2015 

United States Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket ID: FAA-2015-1755 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

In response to a call received from the Federal Aviation Administration on August 11, 2015 (the 

"Second Supplemental Request"), requesting an updated version of CameraBee, LLC's ("CameraBee") 

Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual ("MPTOM"), CameraBee has submitted 

(simultaneously with the submission hereof) an updated version of the MPTOM in accordance with the 

submission instructions for proprietary information provided in the Second Supplemental Request. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ R. Patrick Thornberry 

R. Patrick Thornberry 

RPTHORNB: 

cc: Derek Hammer 

President, CameraBee, LLC
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Subjex Corporation does hereby certifythat:





(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Subjex Corporation for thethree monthsended June 30, 2010(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial conditionand results of operations of Subjex Corporation





Date: August 19, 2010
By:
/s/ Andrew D. HyderAndrew D. HyderPresident& Chief Executive Officer
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: March 17, 2016 106878 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEON BEVERLY,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: February 18, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________

Aaron A. Louridas, Delmar, for appellant.

Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Peter H.

Willis of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady

County (Drago, J.), rendered January 13, 2011, convicting

defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of assault in the

second degree and perjury in the first degree.

In satisfaction of a 12-count indictment, defendant pleaded

guilty to assault in the second degree and perjury in the first

degree. He also waived his right to appeal, both orally and in

writing. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement,

defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to four years

in prison to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision

on the assault conviction, and 3 to 6 years in prison on the

perjury conviction, said sentences to run consecutively. 

Defendant now appeals.
-2- 106878 

Defendant's primary contention is that he was denied the

effective assistance of counsel and that this rendered his guilty

plea involuntary. Although this type of claim is not foreclosed

by a valid waiver of the right to appeal, it has not been

preserved for our review as there is no indication in the record

that defendant made an appropriate postallocution motion (see

People v Broomfield, 128 AD3d 1271, 1271-1272 [2015], lv denied

26 NY3d 1086 [2015]; People v Brown, 128 AD3d 1273, 1274 [2015]). 

Defendant next challenges the severity of the sentence – a

challenge that is precluded by a valid waiver of the right to

appeal. However, we find that the waiver here was invalid

inasmuch as it does not appear that defendant was advised that

the right to appeal was separate and distinct from the other

rights that he was forfeiting by pleading guilty (see People v

Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Pope, 129 AD3d 1389,

13989-1390 [2015]; People v Burgette, 118 AD3d 1034, 1035 [2014],

lv denied 24 NY3d 1118 [2015]). Turning to the merits, we note

that defendant has a lengthy criminal record and agreed to the

sentence as part of a favorable plea agreement that exposed him

to less time in prison than if he was convicted after trial. 

Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion nor any extraordinary

circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the

interest of justice (see People v Miller, 66 AD3d 1242, 1243-1244

[2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 772 [2010]; People v Humphrey, 13 AD3d

815, 816 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 799 [2005]). 

Peters, P.J., Garry and Devine, JJ., concur.
-3- 106878 

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4385 

To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to aid in funding 

of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. MEEK of Florida (for himself, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, and 

Mr. CARNAHAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to 

aid in funding of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States War 

5 Bonds Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to authorize the issuance 

8 of United States War Bonds to aid in the funding of the 

9 operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4385 IH

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF UNITED 

2 STATES WAR BONDS. 

3 Section 3102 of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(f) ISSUANCE OF UNITED STATES WAR BONDS.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized 

7 to issue bonds under this section, to be known as 

8 ‘United States War Bonds’, to aid in the funding of 

9 the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

10 ‘‘(2) FORM.—The bonds authorized by para11 graph (1) shall be in such form and denominations, 

12 and shall be subject to such terms and conditions of 

13 issue, conversion, redemption, maturation, payment, 

14 and rate of interest as the Secretary may prescribe. 

15 ‘‘(3) MARKETING.—The Secretary shall carry 

16 out a program to encourage sales of United States 

17 War Bonds, including activities to facilitate the pur18 chase of such bonds. 

19 ‘‘(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

20 There is authorized to be appropriated $3,000,000 

21 for carrying out the marketing program described in 

22 paragraph (3).’’. 

Æ 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-266 (4)

Judge Marbley

Esmeralda Santos 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 70) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The Court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Counts 1 of the Indictment, and she

is hereby adjudged guilty on this count. The Court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: October 12, 2018 s\Algenon L. Marbley 

 Algenon L. Marbley

 United States District Judge
1

Laura Landes

From: Conley, Sean <Conley.Sean@epa.gov>

Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:16 AM

To: Madhulika Nataraja

Subject: SFI comment - Farrelly

Importance: Low

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

________________________________________

From: Farrelly Peter R [peter.r.farrelly@state.or.us]

Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 5:07 PM

To: Conley, Sean

Subject: RE: Thank you

Your welcome.  Anytime.

And thanks for organizing it all.

I briefly chatted if over with my manager, and we’re not sure the status quo isn’t sufficient to protect public health.  

Perhaps a bigger push to enforce current regulations in lieu of drafting new regulations or guidance is an efficient and

effective means of protecting against outbreaks.  I didn’t find any states deficient in their existing rules; perhaps only

deficient in their execution.

Just my thought after viewing the webinar.  ... on that note, I was hoping to pass along the recorded webinar to my

manager – who was ooo – and also review my own talk.  Will that be available later?

Thanks,

Pete

971.673.0462

From: Conley, Sean [mailto:Conley.Sean@epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 8:49 AM

To: Darrell Osterhoudt; Falco ‐ CDPHE, Ron; Farrelly Peter R; Ken Bousfield; paulolson7@comcast.net; Chan, Clifford;

ronlooks@aol.com; Moore, Randy; Lynn Thorp; Mae Wu; Alan Roberson; Gary Williams

Subject: Thank you

We cannot thank you enough for your participation in the storage facility webinar and public meeting yesterday.  Your

presentations, discussion, and insights were very informative and will be very helpful in considering our path forward.  

We’ll be sure to keep you informed of the future direction of this evaluation. Great job!

Sean Conley

US EPA Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water Standards and Risk Reduction Branch

202‐564‐1781
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Gerald D. Schiefelbein, Chief Financial Officer
of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (a) | the Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
(the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



* * *





|By: | /s/
    Gerald D. Schiefelbein
|--- | ------------------------------
|    | Gerald
    D. Schiefelbein    
|    | Chief Financial
    Officer   



Date: 	May 12, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 116]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Women and the Making of Joyce's                         *Ulysses”*                         at the Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas at Austin, in Austin, Texas, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street, NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Stacy E. White,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs,Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-00160 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Registrant's Specimen Certificate for Ordinary Shares



 Exhibit 4.2 

AUTONAVI HOLDINGS LIMITED 
  

			
	 Number	  	Shares    
	[            ]	  	-[            ]-


Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands 

Share capital is US$50,000 divided into 500,000,000 Shares of US$0.0001 par value each 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [            ] is the registered holder of
[            ] Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof. 

EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the      day of             
2010 by: 
  

					
	 DIRECTOR