alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C HIEF J USTICE

C AROLYN W RIGHT

J USTICES

D AVID L. B RIDGES

M OLLY F RANCIS

D OUGLAS S. L ANG

E LIZABETH L ANG

- M IERS

R OBERT M. F ILLMORE

L ANA M YERS

D AVID E VANS

D AVID L EWIS

A DA B ROW N

C RAIG S TODDART

B ILL W HITEHILL

D AVID J. S CHENCK 

# Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 C OMMERCE S TREET

, S UITE 200

D ALLAS

, T EXAS 75202

(214) 712

- 3400 L ISA M ATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712

- 3450

lisa.matz@ 5th.txcourts.gov

G AYLE H UMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRAT OR

(214) 712

- 3434

gayle.humpa@ 5th.txcourts.gov

F ACSIMILE

(214) 745

- 1083

I NTERNET

HTTP :// 5 TH

. TXCOURTS

. GOV



# December 10, 2015

Shelly T. Greco

Eberstein & Witherite, LLP

3100 Monticello Ave

. , Suite 500

Dallas, TX 75205

Vanessa Rosa

Thompson, Coe , Cousins & Irons, LLP

700 N. Pearl St., 25th Floor

Dallas, TX 75201

Re: Matthew Goggans v. Tonia Marie Ford; 05

- 14

- 01239

- CV

Dear Attorneys:

Enclosed is corrected page 2 for the above

- mentioned case. Please note the following typographical

error, which has been corrected:

At the bottom of page 2 the word sufficient has been changed to in sufficient.

Please replace pages 2, of your previous copy with the enclosed.

Sincerely,

Lisa Matz

Clerk of the Court

cc: Trial court judge

Trial court clerk
Factory
premises lease rental agreement

    


    Party
A:NIVS (HZ)
Audio and Video Tech.Co.,Ltd

     

    Party
B:Hyundai
Light & Electric (HZ) Co.,Ltd

    


    Through
consultation between both parties,Party A will lease
the item which located in  no.29-31 huanzhen west road shuikou town
huizhou city to the Party B, both parties hereby agree upon the following
terms:

    


    Article
1:  The leasing item is the workshop and the dormitory( total area is
5000m2), and
the facilities of water ,power. Party A should have all the formalities that
governments needed under the fire-fighting law. The lease term is three years
(from July.1 2010 to June.30 2013)

    


    Article
2:  Party B should pay to Party A accouding
to  RMB5.00/m2, total
RMB25000.00 (Chinese Dollars twenty five thousand) for factory premises
rents.

    


    Article
3: During the period of using the workshop and the dormitory, Party B should
maintain the fixed assets of Party A. Party B shall not change the construction
of the leasing items. If there is any artificial damage, then all the
expenses of reformation or improvement will be undertaken by party
B.

    


    Article
4: During the period of using the workshop and the dormitory, Party B
should use according to the law and should not sublease to others. Otherwise,
Party A has the right to terminate this agreement as Party B has broken the
agreement.

    


    Article
5: During the period of using the workshop and the dormitory, Party B should be
in accordance with the law to pay all the charges on time.

    


    Article
6: During the period of using the workshop and the dormitory, if there is any
man-made accidents which cause any loss, party B should undertakes the loss by
himself.

    


    Article
7: If Party B wants to terminate this agreement while the lease term is over, he
should inform the other side three months in advance, and to submit the payment
for the last three months.

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    Article
8: While collecting rents, Party A should provide the Official tax invoice to
the Party B for credit basis.

     

    Article
9: Both parties should follow this aggrements. Any disputes arising from the
contract shall be solved through consultation. In case no resolution is reached,
either party can bring a lawsuit before the court.

    


    Article
10: This agreement is in duplicate. Each party shall have one copy. This
agreement will come into effect upon both parties’ signature.

     

    
      
        	
                Party
      A:

              	
                Party
      B:

              
	
                NIVS
      (HZ) Audio and Video Tech.Co.,Ltd

              	
                Hyundai
      Light & Electric (HZ)
Co.,Ltd
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.52
 Photon Dynamics, Inc.
2005 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
 Stock Option Agreement
 (Nonstatutory Stock Option)
   1. Vesting.
 2. Number Of Shares And Exercise Price.
 3. [Exercise Prior To Vesting (Early Exercise). provided, however,
 (a)
 (b)
 (c) ]
 4. Method Of Payment. permitted by your Grant Notice,
 1.




---



##### 



(a) The Wall Street
Journal
 (b) The Wall Street Journal
 5. Whole Shares.
 6. Securities Law Compliance.
 7. Term.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 2.




---



##### 



(d)
 (e)
 (f)
 [ [ ] [ ] ]
 8. Exercise.
 (a)
 (b)
 9. Transferability.
 10. Option Not A Service Contract.
 3.




---



##### 



11. Withholding Obligations.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 12. Notices.
 13. Governing Plan Document.
 4.
Heli Electronics Corp.: Exhibit 10.6 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Supplemental Agreement

Party A: Suzhou Haier Information Technology Co.,
Ltd.
Address: 702B, South ChuangPai Building, Haier Industrial Park, No. 1,
Haier Road, Qingdao 
Tel: 0532-88937818 
Fax: 0532-88937826

E-mail:

Party B: Guangzhou Heli Information Technology Co.,
Ltd.
Add: Room 1118, East Tower, Time Squire, No. 30, Tianhe North Road,
Guangzhou 
Tel: 020-22646876 
Fax: 020-22646868 
E-mail:

Party A and Party B signed “Distributor Agreement” on 8th
April 2008, according to "The People's Republic of China Contract Law" and
other relevant legal provisions, for distribution of Haier brand multimedia
speakers, mini-combination speakers, and home theater products. Hereby both
parties enter into this supplemental agreement for the Distributor Agreement,
and agree on the following terms: 

	1. 	
      After repeated consulations, the two parties agree to
      make supplemental terms in inventory issue to the distributor agreement:
      After delivering the goods to Party B’s warehouse, Party A will not assume
      any responsibility for storage safeguard of the goods; Party B will
      undertake all security responsibilities for the goods in its
    warehouse.

	 	 
	2. 	
      The two parties agree that Party B assumes all
      responsibilities of goods sales, that is the goods sales risk will
      transfer with the goods delivery. Once the goods have been delivered to
      Party B, Party B will take on the sales of the goods, and Party A will not
      assume the risk of return of goods.

	 	 
	3. 	
      Adopted by consensus, Party A permits t Party B to modify
      the products according to customers’ requirements.

	 	 
	4. 	
      Based on the principle of right in line with obligations,
      the two parties make amendments of No.9 term in Section 3 of the
      distributor agreement: the product sale prices will be totally decided by
      Party B, and Party A will not interfere any longer.

	 	 
	5. 	
      Outstanding issues for a separate agreement.

	 	 
	6. 	
      This supplemental agreement is reached by a consensus
      through full negotiations by the two parties on a basis of equality and
      willingness. It takes effect from the date of signature by both
      parties.

	 	 
	7. 	
      This supplemental agreement is in duplicate, and each
      party holds one.




	/s/ Party A 	/s/ Party B 
	Date: 2010-05-28 	Date: 2010-05-28
Brett A. Adkins,

Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Case No. l:17-cv-643

Marathon Petroleum Company, LP,

Defendant.

Judge Susan J. Dlott

Order Striking Filings and Extending

Deadlines

Plaintiff filed a Motion in Limine (Doc. 129) and a Statement of [Proposed] Undisputed

Facts (Doc. 130-1) both on June 30,2021. Both filings violate this Court's Standing Order on

Civil Procedures, which can be found at https://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/FPDlott. As to the

Motion in Limine, Plaintiff did not request leave of the Court to file a memorandum in excess of

twenty (20) pages. Plaintiff also did not file a table of contents and summary as required for a

memorandum exce^ing twenty (20) pages. Finally, as to both filings. Plaintiff failed to use the

correct citation format. Parties are required to file depositions, deposition exhibits, and exhibits

to dispositive motions before they file the dispositive motions. Citations to depositions,

deposition exhibits, and other exhibits must include the CM/ECF Doc. # and PagelD #.

Accordingly, the Court will strike Plaintiffs Motion in Limine (Doc. 129) and Statement

of [Proposed] Undisputed Facts (Doc. 130-1) without prejudice to refiling. Plaintiff has leave to

file a renewed Motion in Limine not to exceed thirty-eight (38) pages and a renewed Statement

of Proposed Undisputed Facts both no later than July 16,2021. The filings must comply with

the Court's Standing Order on Civil Procedures in all respects. The deadline for Plaintiff and

Defendant to file memoranda in opposition to all pending motions will be extended to August

20,2021 and the deadline to file the reply briefs will be extended to September 17,2021.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

y.

Susan J. DIott

United States District Judge
Aircraft Maintenance

Date Time Technician Acircraft Hours Scheduled Maintenance
Repairs Part Replacement Details
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00860**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 00860\00860_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00860\00860_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 00860\00860_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 00860\00860_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00860\Certification Statement_00860.pdf Plant certification statement

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 1, 11/2013

Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 6/11/2014

Sample Number: 141991-001 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 08:59 Date Received: 6/3/2014

Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 2.0 ng/L 1 0.4 TLT 06/08/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141991-002 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 08:59 Date Received: 6/3/2014

FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 59.9 ng/L 20 8 TLT 06/08/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141991-003 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 09:14 Date Received: 6/3/2014

WWTP Outlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 32.1 ng/L 20 8 TLT 06/10/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141991-004 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 09:17 Date Received: 6/3/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 35.2 ng/L 20 8 TLT 06/10/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141991-005 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 09:19 Date Received: 6/3/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 29.2 ng/L 20 8 TLT 06/10/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141991-006 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 09:37 Date Received: 6/3/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 71.7 ng/L 50 20 TLT 06/10/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141991-007 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 09:37 Date Received: 6/3/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 76.2 ng/L 50 20 TLT 06/10/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Amos Plant, 141991 Page 1 of 2
Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 6/11/2014

Sample Number: 141991-008 Date Collected: 06/03/2014 09:43 Date Received: 6/3/2014

WWTP Inlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 190000 ng/L 10000 4000 TLT 06/08/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Amos Plant, 141991 Page 2 of 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
, Appellant,

v.

HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPEDICS a/a/o CYNTHIA JOSEPH
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 234

[ June 30, 2021 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Mardi Levey Cohen , Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE16

- 20777 and CACE19

- 005468

.

Michael A. Rosenberg, Thomas L. Hunker and Peter Weinstein of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

Dav id B. Pakula of David B. Pakula, P.A., Pembroke Pines and Amir Fleischer of Marks & Fleischer, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Geico Indem. Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic, P.A. , No.

4D21

- 0457 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 2021).

G ROSS

, M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People v. Johh Allen.

*Waiver of vrregula/rity by pleading not guilty.*

Pleading to a complaint presented in justice’s court waives the irregularity of omitting to issue a subpoena before serving the warrant.

Exceptions before judgment from Allegan. (Arnold, J.)

June 19.

June 22.

Complaint for drunkenness. Respondent was convicted below.

Affirmed.

*Padghcm, db Padghcm,*for respondent appellant.

Attorney General *Jacob J. VcmRvper*for the People.

Sherwood, J.

The respondent was convicted before a magistrate, under the liquor law of 1881, of the offense of' “ being drunk in a public street ” in the village of Allegan, *177From this conviction he took a general appeal to the circuit court, where his case was retried; a conviction was again obtained, and from this judgment he brings error, and the proceedings at the circuit are now before us for review.

"When respondent appeared before the magistrate he pleaded not guilty to the complaint, and the case was adjourned for trial. On the adjourned day he appeared with counsel, and “moved to set aside his plea,” that he might make a motion to dismiss. The motion was denied by the magistrate.

On the trial at the circuit the complaint, warrant, bond on appeal, and return were offered in evidence by the respondent, and thereupon his counsel moved the court to dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction, because no subpoena was issued for respondent before the service of the warrant upon him. The court denied the motion, and error is assigned upon this ruling.

We think the ruling was correct. The irregularity complained of, and upon which the exception is founded in this case, was waived by respondent when he appeared before the magistrate and made his plea. *Crane v. Hardy*1 Mich. 56; *Falkner v. Beers*2 Doug. (Mich.) 117; *Tower v. Lamb*6 Mich. 362; *People v. Clark*33 Mich. 113; *Stewart v. Hill*1 Mich. 265; *Lewis v. Brackenridge*1 Blackf. 112, 115; *Pierce v. Rehfuss*35 Mich. 53.

The judgment must be affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANUEL ALFONSO PAZ,

Petitioner,

v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 72345

Agency No. A073

- 914

- 628

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 2 , 2020 * *

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT , Circuit Judges.

Manuel Alfonso Paz , a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA ”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for withholding of removal

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“ CAT ”). We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo q uestions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey
,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 8 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 17

- 72345

512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to

the BIA’s interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v.

Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review for substantial evidence

the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th

Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not err in finding that Paz did not establish membership in a

cognizable particular social group. See Reyes v. Lynch , 842 F.3d 1125, 1131 (9th

Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular social group, “[t]he

applicant must ‘establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a

common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially

distinct within the society in question’” (quoting Matter of M

- E

- V

- G

- , 26 I. & N.

Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014)) )

. Thus
, Paz’s withholding of removal clai m fails.

In light of this disposition, we need not reach Paz’s contentions regarding

nexus, the severity of his past harm
, or the likelihood of future harm in El

Salvador. See Simeonov , 371 F.3d at 538 (courts and agencies are not required to

decide issue s unnecessary to the results they reach ).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Pa z
failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with the consent

or acquiescence of the government if returned to El S alvador

. See Aden v. Holder
,3 17

- 72345

589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
3333 6 6 

ACETO 

Aceto Corporation 

4 Tri Harbor Court 

Port Washington, NY 11050 

Tel: (516) 627 6000 

Fax: (516) 627 6093 

www.aceto .com 

February 16, 2011 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

p~ippipuim~pupug 

ATTN: TSCA Section 4 - Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

Re: Application for Exemption, Section 4 Test Rule, D-erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, gamma.-

lactone, monosodim salt, CAS#6381-77-7, Testing of certain high production volume 

chemicals ; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 

CFR 799.5087 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Aceto Corporation submits this application for exemption from the requirements for testing D-erythrohez-2-enonic acid, gamma.-lactone, monosodim salt, CAS#6381-77-7 under TSCA Section 4 Test 

Rule as noted above. 

As part of our exemption application we are providing the following information : 

(a) The identity of the test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. of the test substance on 

which the application is based. 

Testing of certain high production volume chemicals ; Second group of Chemicals, Federal 

Register, Vol. 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087, D-erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, 

gamma.-lactone, monosodim salt, CAS#6381-77-7. 

(b) We are requesting an exemption from all testing requirements for D-erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, 

gamma.-lactone, monosodim salt, CAS#6381-77-7 under 40 CFR 799.5087 because we will no 

longer be conducting business activities with this chemical. 

(c) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant . 

ACETO Corporation 

4 Tri Harbor Court 

Port Washington, NY 11050 

516-627-6000 

(d) Name, address, and telephone number of appropriate individual to contact for further information. 

Suhey Francisco . 

Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs 

ACETO Corporation 

O~'Pr 2X7, 0,31 

0 RF-CEIVFC~ P 

RECD MAR 11 2011 

I ! FEB 23 AM 6: 07 

CONTAINS NO CBI 
4 Tri Harbor Court 

Port Washington, NY 11050 

516-627-6000 

As per 40 CFR 790.99, ACETO Corporation provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our 

application for exemption: 

I (ACETO Corporation) understand that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period 

described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, ACETO Corporation must pay fair and equitable 

reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the 

requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. 

If you have any further questions please contact me. 

Suhey'Francisco . 

Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs 

ACETO Corporation