Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 747 

7See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 8See Order, 82 FR at 27229. 

Assessment Rates 

Commerce shall determine and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. For ULMA, 

we calculated importer-specific 

assessment rates on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of those 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). Where an importerspecific assessment rate is de minimis 

(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the entries 

by that importer will be liquidated 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by ULMA for 

which it did not know its merchandise 

was destined for the United States, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.7 For the companies 

identified above that were not selected 

for individual examination, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries at the 

rates established in these final results of 

review. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements for estimated antidumping 

duties will be effective upon publication 

of this notice for all shipments of 

flanges from Spain entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication as provided by section 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 

rate for the companies subject to this 

review will be equal to the companyspecific weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

the review; (2) for merchandise exported 

by producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

completed segment of the proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published in 

the completed segment for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

completed segment of this proceeding, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established in the completed 

segment for the most recent period for 

the producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will continue to be 18.81 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value investigation 

of this proceeding.8 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Regarding Administrative Protective 

Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction or return of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the destruction or return 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 30, 2021. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Currency of Imputed Credit 

Expenses 

Comment 2: Scrap Offset 

Comment 3: Differential Pricing 

Methodology 

Comment 4: Marine Insurance Currency 

Comment 5: Rounding of General and 

Administrative Expenses Ratio 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–00018 Filed 1–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Advisory Committee on Supply Chain 

Competitiveness: Notice of Public 

Meeting 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of open meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the 

schedule and proposed topics of 

discussion for the upcoming public 

meeting of the Advisory Committee on 

Supply Chain Competitiveness 

(Committee). 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

January 20, 2022, from 12:00 p.m. to 

1:30 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST). 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held 

via Webex. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard Boll, Office of Supply Chain, 

Professional & Business Services, 

International Trade Administration at 

Email: richard.boll@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: The Committee was 

established under the discretionary 

authority of the Secretary of Commerce 

and in accordance with the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 

App.). It provides advice to the 

Secretary of Commerce on the necessary 

elements of a comprehensive policy 

approach to supply chain 

competitiveness and on regulatory 

policies and programs and investment 

priorities that affect the competitiveness 

of U.S. supply chains. For more 

information about the Committee visit: 

https://www.trade.gov/acscc. 

Matters To Be Considered: Committee 

members are expected to continue 

discussing the major competitivenessrelated topics raised at the previous 

Committee meetings, including supply 

chain resilience and congestion; trade 

and competitiveness; freight movement 

and policy; trade innovation; regulatory 

issues; finance and infrastructure; 

workforce development; and the work of 


TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
748 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

8166 (February 4, 2021). 

2See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules from the 

People’s Republic of China: Partial Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019, 

86 FR 38978 (July 23, 2021). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

the Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 30, 2021; see 

also Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of the Deadline for 

Preliminary Results,’’ dated September 2, 2021; and 

Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results,’’ dated December 6, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Administrative 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or 

Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s 

Republic of China; 2019,’’ dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

5See Trina’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of No Sales,’’ dated 

March 5, 2021. The Trina companies for which 

rescission of review was requested are: Changzhou 

Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd., Changzhou Trina Solar 

Yabang Energy Co. Ltd., Hubei Trina Solar Energy 

Co. Ltd., Trina Solar Co., Ltd., Trina Solar 

(Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd., 

Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd., and Yancheng 

Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd. 

6See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

the Committee’s subcommittees. The 

agenda may change to accommodate 

other Committee business. 

The meeting is open to the public and 

press on a first-come, first-served basis. 

Space is limited. Members of the public 

and the press wishing to participate 

should contact Richard Boll, at 

richard.boll@trade.gov, for participation 

information no later than 24 hours 

before the meeting. 

Interested parties may submit written 

comments to the Committee at any time 

before and after the meeting by emailing 

them to richard.boll@trade.gov. 

Comments may be considered at the 

meeting. The transcript of the meeting 

will be posted on the Committee 

website within 60 days of the meeting. 

Dated: December 30, 2021. 

Heather Sykes, 

Director, Office of Supply Chain, Professional, 

and Business Services. 

[FR Doc. 2021–28595 Filed 1–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–980] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Preliminary Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review and Intent To Rescind, in Part; 

2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that countervailable subsidies were 

provided to producers and exporters of 

crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 

whether or not assembled into modules, 

(solar cells) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) during the period of 

review (POR), January 1, 2019, through 

December 31, 2019. In addition, we 

intend to rescind this review with 

respect to 48 companies. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable January 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Copyak, Chien-Min Yang, or 

Lingjun Wang, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3642, (202) 482–5484, or 

(202) 482–2316. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 4, 2021, Commerce 

initiated this administrative review of 

the countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

solar cells from China on 83 

companies.1 On July 23, 2021, we 

partially rescinded this review with 

respect to eleven companies for which 

the requests for review were withdrawn 

by the requesting parties within 90 days 

of the date of publication of the notice 

of initiation in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1).2 Therefore, this review 

now covers 72 companies, of which JA 

Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. 

(JA Solar) and Risen Energy Co., Ltd. 

(Risen) are the mandatory respondents. 

On July 30, September 2, and 

December 6, 2021, Commerce extended 

the time limit for completion of these 

preliminary results until no later than 

December 30, 2021.3

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.4 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is provided in an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 

and modules, laminates, and panels, 

consisting of crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic cells, whether or not 

partially or fully assembled into other 

products, including, but not limited to, 

modules, laminates, panels, and 

building integrated materials. For a 

complete description of the scope of this 

order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Intent To Rescind Review, in Part 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3), we intend to rescind this 

review with respect to 48 other 

companies for which we find no 

reviewable suspended entries of subject 

merchandise, based on U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) data. See 

Appendix III for a complete list of those 

companies. 

Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (formerly, 

Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.) 

and its cross-owned companies 

(collectively, Trina) certified that they 

had no sales of subject merchandise 

during the POR and requested rescission 

of the review.5 However, the CBP entry 

data on the record show shipments 

made by these companies during the 

POR. Thus, we have requested entry 

information from CBP regarding these 

shipments. Upon receipt from CBP, we 

will place the information on the record, 

provide an opportunity for interested 

parties to comment, and then determine 

whether to rescind the review for these 

companies. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For 

each of the subsidy programs 

preliminarily found to be 

countervailable, Commerce 

preliminarily finds that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution 

from an authority that gives rise to a 

benefit to the recipient, and that the 

subsidy is specific.6 For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our preliminary conclusions, 

including our reliance, in part, on facts 

available with adverse inferences 

pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of 


TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE