alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 3333 6 6

ACETO Aceto Corporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 Tel : (516) 627 6000 Fax : (516) 627 6093 www .aceto .com February 16, 2011 

### Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 

# p~ippipuim~pupug

ATTN : TSCA Section 4 - Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 Re: Application for Exemption, Section 4 Test Rule, D-erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, gamma .- lactone, monosodim

salt, CAS#6381-77-7, Testing of certain high production volume chemicals ; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087 Dear Sir or Madam

: Aceto Corporation submits this application for exemption fromthe requirements for testing D-erythrohez-2-enonic acid, gamma.-lactone, monosodim salt, CAS#6381-77-7 under TSCA Section 4 Test Rule as noted above. As part ofour exemption application we are providing the following information: (a) The identity of the test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. ofthe test substance on which the application is based. Testing of certain high production volume chemicals ; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087, D-erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, gamma .-lactone, monosodim salt, CAS#6381-77-7. (b) We are requesting an exemption fromall testing requirements for D-erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, gamma .-lactone, monosodimsalt, CAS#6381-77-7 under 40 CFR 799.5087 because we will no longer be conducting business activities with this chemical . (c) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant . ACETOCorporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 516-627-6000 (d) Name, address, and telephone number of appropriate individual to contact for further information. Suhey Francisco. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETOCorporation 

# O~'Pr 2X7, 0,31 RF-CEIVFC~ 

# 0P RECD MAR 11 2011 I ! FEB 23 AM 6

: 07



# CONTAINS NOCBI4 Tri Harbor Court



### Port Washington, NY 11050 516-627-6000 As per 40 CFR 790.99, ACETOCorporation provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our application for exemption: I (ACETOCorporation) understand that ifthis application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) ofTSCAexpires, ACETOCorporation must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. If you have any further questions please contact me.

Suhey'Francisco. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETOCorporation
**Exhibit 14(5)**

----

**Eidos PLC – Directorate      Change**

15th July 2003      EIDOS PLC BOARD CHANGES

Eidos plc (LSE:EID.L, NASDAQ:EIDSY),    one of the world’s leading publishers and developers of entertainment software,    today announces that Jeremy Heath-Smith, Development Director of the Company    and Managing Director of Core Design Limited, will be stepping down from    the boards of both companies with immediate effect.

The Eidos Board would like to    express its gratitude to Jeremy for his contribution to the development of    the Eidos Group over the past seven years.

| Enquiries:                    |               |
|-------------------------------|--------------------|
|                          |               |
| Eidos plc                     | 020 8636 3000      |
| John van Kuffeler, Chairman   |               |
| Mike McGarvey, CEO            |               |
| Stuart Cruickshank, CFO       |               |
|                          |               |
| Brunswick                     | 020 7404 5959      |
| Jonathan Glass/James Crampton |               |
| Nina Pawlak                   | (001) 212-333-3810 |

Notes

1. Certain statements made in    this announcement with respect to the Group’s plans, strategies and beliefs    and other statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements    (as that term is defined in the United States Private Securities Legislation    Reform Act of 1995) that involve risks and uncertainties because they relate    to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. There    are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments    to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking    statements including, without limitation, general economic conditions in    the Group’s markets, particularly levels of consumer spending; exchange rates,    particularly between the pound sterling and the U.S. dollar, in which the    Group makes significant sales; and the Group’s ability to continue to win    acceptance of its products, which are offered in highly competitive markets    characterised by continual new product introductions, rapid developments    in technology and subjective and changing consumer preferences (particularly    in the entertainment business) and other risks described in reports and filings    made by Eidos plc with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to update    any forward-looking statements contained in this announcement, whether as    a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

2. The Company name and other    brand and/or product names referred to in this statement are registered trademarks    or trademarks pending registration in accordance with the relevant national    laws worldwide. All rights reserved.

1

----
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Orchid BioSciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                                                                                 
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 17, 2004 |  | /S/ PAUL J. KELLY, MD                                                                                           
|                    |  | Paul J. Kelly, MD Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                         
|                    | 
|Dated: May 17, 2004 |  | /S/ MICHAEL E. SPICER                                                                                           
|                    |  | Michael E. Spicer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Glenn Passavant/AA/USEPA/US

To: "Whiteman, Chad" <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: amanda_i_lee@omb.eop.gov

Date: 05/11/2012 03:23 PM

Subject: Green Book



### Thank you for your concurrence on including the EPA Green Book website as a source for illustrating the

air quality need for the air craft NOx rule. I agree with your stipulation that its use for this purpose here

does not necessarily serve as a precedent for its use for this purpose in any future trules.

GLENN W. PASSAVANT

ASSESSMENT & STANDARDS DIVISION

OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION AND AIR QUALITY

US EPA ANN ARBOR, MI

734

- 214

- 4408
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4357 

To use amounts repaid to the Treasury under the Troubled Assets Relief 

Program for relief to displaced and low-wage workers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. BACA (for himself and Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, 

and in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor and Ways 

and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To use amounts repaid to the Treasury under the Troubled 

Assets Relief Program for relief to displaced and lowwage workers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Bailout for 

5 American Individuals and Families in Distress Today and 

6 Tomorrow Act of 2009’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4357 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF REPAID TARP FUNDS TO FEDERAL 

2 EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Of funds that were made 

4 available under title I of the Emergency Economic Sta5 bilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5211 et seq.) that have 

6 been repaid to the Treasury by a financial institution, the 

7 Secretary of the Treasury shall— 

8 (1) make available to the Secretary of Labor 

9 $8,000,000,000 which shall be available for obliga10 tion on the date of enactment of this Act, as follows: 

11 (A) for activities under the Workforce In12 vestment Act of 1998— 

13 (i) $2,000,000,000 for grants to the 

14 States for adult employment and training 

15 activities, including supportive services and 

16 needs-related payments described in sec17 tion 134(e)(2) and (3) of such Act (29 

18 U.S.C. 2864(e)(2) and (3)); and 

19 (ii) $2,000,000,000 for Migrant and 

20 Seasonal Farmworker Programs under sec21 tion 167 of such Act (29 U.S.C. 2912); 

22 and 

23 (B) $4,000,000,000 for benefits and serv24 ices under the Trade Adjustment Assistance for 

25 Workers program authorized in chapter II of 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4357 IH

1 title II of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

2 2271 et seq.); and 

3 (2) make available to the Secretary of Health 

4 and Human Services $2,000,000,000 which shall be 

5 available for obligation on the date of enactment of 

6 this Act for deposit into the Emergency Contingency 

7 Fund for State Temporary Assistance for Needy 

8 Families Programs established under section 403(c) 

9 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(c)). 

10 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—The transfers authorized 

11 under subsection (a) shall be deemed actions authorized 

12 under title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act 

13 of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5201 et seq.). 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
---

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of 24 Hour Auction
  (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended May 31, 2002 as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, the undersigned, being
  the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that:

|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: September 17, 2004 | Signed: | /s/ Robin Lee                                          
|------------------------ | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Name:   | Robin Lee                                              
|                         | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

ex. rel. BOWEN,

Plaintiff/Relator,

 Case No. 2:17-cv-936

v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson

KARVO COMPANIES, INC., et al.,

 

Defendants.

ORDER

The United States, and Relator Joseph Bowen (“Relator”), having filed a Stipulation of 

Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

The Civil Action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Relator, with prejudice as to the 

United States as to the Covered Conduct defined in Recital Paragraph C of the Settlement 

Agreement entered by the parties hereto, and without prejudice as to the United States as to all

other claims; 

This Court retains jurisdiction to administer, interpret and enforce the Settlement

Agreement, including any disputes, claims and/or causes of action relating to the Settlement

Agreement and the payments required thereunder; and

Except as expressly provided to the contrary in the Settlement Agreement, each party shall 

bear its own legal and other costs incurred in connection with this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8/9/2021 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 2:17-cv-00936-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 22 Filed: 08/09/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 109
Exhibit 10.11






Exhibit 10.11


DESCRIPTION OF ARRANGEMENT FOR DIRECTORS FEES



The following sets forth the amount of fees payable to non-employee directors of S1 Corporation effective as of June 5,
2010 for their services as directors.



	 	 	 	 	 
	EVENT

	 	FEE

	 

	 	 
	Annual Retainer (Board Chairman)

	 	$	100,000	 
	Annual Retainer (excluding Board Chairman)

	 	$	35,000	 
	Board Meeting Attended

	 	$	2,000	 
	Annual Committee Chair Retainer
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee

	 	$	20,000	 
	Compensation Committee

	 	$	15,000	 
	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

	 	$	15,000	 
	Strategic Planning Committee

	 	$	15,000	 
	Yodlee Board Representative

	 	$	15,000	 
	Committee Meeting Attended

	 	$	2,000	 
	Yodlee Board / Committee Meeting Attended

	 	$	2,000	 
	Annual Stock Option Grant

	 	10,000 shares (quarterly vesting)

	Annual Restricted Stock Grant

	 	6,000 shares (quarterly vesting)






 


5
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                        MATZEL & MUMFORD AT FREEHOLD, LLC
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         418,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,509,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,020,004
<PP&E>                                           3,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,024,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,879,015
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,024,004
<SALES>                                     22,362,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,372,681
<CGS>                                       19,842,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,842,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,793,925
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                735,782
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            735,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   735,782
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Gerald Burton,
Plaintiff(s),
Case Number: 1:17c¢v767

TM Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

Joseph W. Kirby, et al.,
Defendant(s).
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Karen L. Litkovitz filed on November 11, 2017(Doc. 2), to whom this case was referred pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing
such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired November 29, 2017, hereby ADOPTS said
Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) that an appeal of any Order adopting the
Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefore, denying plaintiff leave to
appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court
of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6" Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd
v. United States Postal Service., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6" Cir.).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Akins (Bee

Judge Susan J. Dig
United States Distrfet Court
Draft Proposal CB-31 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

High Pressure Duct Systems (CB-31) 

Objective:   Consistency in presentation of criteria for duct systems.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C403.2.7.1.3 as follows:

C403.2.7.1.3 High-pressure duct systems. All Ducts ducts and plenums designed to operate at static 

pressures in excess of greater than 3 inches water gauge shall be insulated and sealed in accordance with 

Section C403.2.7. In addition, ducts and plenums shall be leak tested in accordance with the SMACNA 

HVAC Air Duct Leakage Test Manual with the and shown to have a rate of air leakage (CL) less than or 

equal to 6.0 as determined in accordance with Equation 4-5. 

(Equation 4‐5 remains unchanged.)

(The last sentence of the section remains unchanged.)

Reason:  Consistency with the provisions in Section C403.2.7.1.2.   

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark E.
Ties, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                         /s/ Mark E. Ties
                                         -----------------------------
                                         Mark E. Ties
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         October 7, 2002
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Hi, 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Friday, June 21, 2013 10:50 AM 

Tatitlek IRA Council/Tribal Administrator 

Reeve Air Alaska, Mike Reeve; Dan Owen (dan@flyaat.com); Security Aviation, Jason 

Ward ; Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Request for Comment on the 2nd Round Proposals at Tatitlek 

Alaska Air Transit Re-bid 2013.pdf; Security Aviation re-bid 2013.doc; Reeve Re-bid 

2013.doc 

Attached above are copies of the three timely-filed proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Tatitlek. These proposals 

are directly from the carriers and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov, 

at DOT-OST-2013-0030, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding. Community comments, especially of 

village officials, are a critically important element in our carrier-selection decision. We ask that you get back to us, 

preferably by email, no later than July 1, 2013. We will docket this email, as well as any replies. 

In brief, look at the proposals, and if you have any questions, call any of the three carriers or me, and get back to us by 

the deadline, July 1. 

1, •••• : 

Best, 

! ; 

Kevin Adams 

Industry Economist 

202-366-1047 

i I 

.... :·.:: •.... 

Notes: 

1. Typically we afford communities thirty days to get back to us with their comments. YesteFd'ay I called Ms. 

Victoria Vlassoff. She agreed that in view of the urgency of the case and the fact this is a re-solicitation of 

comments, she would be pleased to have a reduced comment period. 

2. Some carriers have indicated on their proposals the passenger fares and freight rates they intend to charge if 

they were selected. Such indications are illustrative only. EAS contracts, when implemented with a carrierselection Order, focus on frequency, routing, aircraft type, and the level of subsidy in their payout 

provisions. Within those four parameters, the selected carrier has a great deal of discretion as to how it will 

meet the contract. 

1