alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation
Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  President  and Chief
Executive  Officer  and Sr.  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation, (the "Company"), herby certify that to the best
of my  knowledge,  the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the Company for the
period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements
of  section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed
original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to
the  registrant  and will be retained by it and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: August 10, 2005.     /s/ Michael Ward                 /s/ James B. Smith
                           --------------------             --------------------
                           President and CEO                Sr. V.P. and CFO
Order entered May 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01591-CR

CHARLES LEE GALLAMORE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 001-85499-2013

ORDER

The clerk’s record has been filed in this appeal, but the reporter’s record has not been 

filed. The court reporter filed a letter stating that appellant, who was represented by retained 

counsel at trial, but is pursuing the appeal pro se, did not request or pay for the reporter’s record. 

Appellant filed a pro se brief that does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1. 

At the beginning of the brief, appellant states that he cannot afford the reporter’s record. 

In light of this information, we ORDER the trial court to make findings of fact regarding 

whether appellant has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of indigence or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if 
appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be 

necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new 

counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether 

retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; and (2) the earliest date by which the reporter’s 

record can be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The Court will defer any issues related to appellant’s pro se brief pending receipt of the 

trial court’s findings.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00243-CR

SAMUEL CRAWFORD PATTERSON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 361st District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-00251-CRF-361

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Samuel Crawford Patterson appealed the trial court’s judgment of conviction. He 

now moves to dismiss the appeal, citing the parties have reached an agreement in the 

underlying criminal proceeding. Patterson and his attorney have signed the motion. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Accordingly, Patterson’s motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is 

dismissed. Id.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Patterson v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray, 

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Rex Davis1

Motion granted

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 13, 2022

Do not publish

[CR25]

1 The Honorable Rex Davis, Senior Justice (Retired) of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment 

of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000117 14-MAR-2014 02:56 PM SCWC-13-0000117 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

MICHAEL DOYLE RUGGLES, REV. NANCY WAITE HARRIS, KENNETH V. MIYAMOTO-SLAUGHTER, WENDY TATUM, DAVID TATUM, and ROBERT S. MURRAY, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants, and GEORGE HERMAN KLARE, BARBARA JEAN LANG, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees,

vs. DOMINIC YAGONG, DONALD IKEDA, J. YOSHIMOTO, DENNIS ONISHI, FRED BLAS, BRITTANY SMART, BRENDA FORD, ANGEL PILAGO, and PETE HOFFMAN, current Hawai ' i County Council members;

JAY KIMURA, Hawai ' i County Prosecutor; MITCHELL ROTH and CHARLENE IBOSHI, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys;

BILLY KENOI, Hawai' i County Chief of Police, KELLY GREENWELL, GUY ENRIQUES, and EMILY NAEOLE, previous Hawai ' i County Council members, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000117; CIV. NO. 11-1-117) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ. and Circuit Judge Crandall, assigned by reason of vacancy)It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time Petitioners’ “notice of appeal” was filed,

seeHawai ' i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)-(b) (Supp. 2013); seealsoHawai' i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2013), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners’ “notice of appeal” that was refiled in SCWC-13-0000117, on March 6, 2014, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2013) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”). 1 DATED: Honolulu, Hawai' i, March 14, 2014. Michael D. Ruggles, Rev. Nancy Waite Harris, Kenneth V. Miyamoto-Slaughter, Wendy Tatum, David Tatum, and Robert S. Murray, petitioners pro se /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Virginia L. Crandall

1 HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2013) further provides: (2) REQUEST EXTENDING TIME; TIME TO FILE . A party may extend the time to file an application for a writ of certiorari by filing a written request for an extension. The request for extension shall be filed no later than 30 days after entry of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order. (3) TIMELY REQUEST; AUTOMATIC EXTENSION; NOTICE . Upon receipt of a timely written request, the appellate clerk shall extend the time for filing the application to the sixtieth day after entry of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment or dismissal order. The appellate clerk shall note on the record that the extension was granted. The clerk shall give notice the request is timely and granted. (4) NO EXTENSION IF UNTIMELY . An untimely request shall not extend the time. The clerk shall give notice the request is untimely and denied. 2
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

          Name                     State of Organization     Percentage Owned
          ----                     ---------------------     ----------------

Odd-Job Holdings, Inc.                 Delaware                  100%

Odd-Job Acquisition Corp.              Delaware                  100% (1)

ZS Peddlers Mart, Inc.                 Delaware                  100% (2)

Odd Job Trading Corp.                  New York                  100% (2)

HIA Trading Associates                 New York                  100% (3)


(1)    Wholly-owned subsidiary of Odd-Job Holdings, Inc.
(2)    Wholly-owned subsidiary of Odd-Job Acquisition Corp.
(3)    General partnership with Odd-Job Acquisition Corp.
                and Odd Job Trading Corp. as partners.
Exhibit 23.1 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-100),on Form S-3 (No. 333-21625), on Form S-3 (No. 333-32345), on Form S-8 (No. 333-10255), on Form S-8 (No. 333-25639), and on Form S-8 (No. 333-43427) of Extended Stay America, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2003, relating to the financialstatements, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Spartanburg, South Carolina 

February 27, 2003
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 423 

To provide compensation for certain World War II veterans who survived 

the Bataan Death March and were held as prisoners of war by the Japanese. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2009 

Mr. MICA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide compensation for certain World War II veterans 

who survived the Bataan Death March and were held 

as prisoners of war by the Japanese. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Samuel B. Moody Ba5 taan Death March Compensation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENT TO WORLD WAR II VETERANS WHO SUR7 VIVED BATAAN DEATH MARCH. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the military de9 partment concerned shall pay, upon request, to an indiVerDate Nov 24 2008 04:04 Jan 12, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H423.IH H423

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 423 IH

1 vidual described in subsection (b) the amount determined 

2 with respect to that individual under subsection (c). 

3 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—A payment under sub4 section (a) shall be made to any individual who as a mem5 ber of the Armed Forces during World War II— 

6 (1) was captured on the peninsula of Bataan or 

7 island of Corregidor in the territory of the Phil8 ippines by Japanese forces; and 

9 (2) participated in and survived the Bataan 

10 Death March. 

11 (c) AMOUNT TO BE PAID.—The amount of a pay12 ment under subsection (a) to an individual shall be $4 for 

13 each day during which the individual was held in captivity 

14 by Japanese forces during World War II, compounded an15 nually at a 3 percent annual rate of interest. 

16 (d) PAYMENT TO SURVIVORS.—In the case of an indi17 vidual described in subsection (b) who is deceased, pay18 ment under this section with respect to that individual 

19 shall be made to that individual’s nearest surviving rel20 ative, as determined by the Secretary concerned. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 April 30, 2008 Ms. Nancy Wrona Director, Air Quality Division Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 

### 1110W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Dear Ms. Wrona: Thank you for your submission of the Final Report onthe State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan forthe Year 2007. We recognize that producing this document and the associated public inspectionprocess represented new requirements and we appreciate your effort to meet them. We have reviewed the submitted document and have found that it meets the minimum requirements set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel freeto contact me at 

### (415) 972-3261.

Air Quality Analysis Office Air Division

cc: Stephen Peplau, ADEQ Bernard Lum, ADEQ Sandra Wardwell, ADEQ
EX-3.2                    CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                        Certificate of Amendment to
                         Articles of Incorporation
                       For Nevada Profit Corporation
           (Pursuant to NRS 78.380 - Before Issuance of Stock)

1.  Name of corporation: World Am Communications, Inc.

2.  The articles have been amended as follows (provide article
numbers, if available):

Article IV: Shares of Stock

A.  Common Stock:  The corporation is authorized to issue 500,000,000
shares of common stock having $0.0001 par value.

B.  Class A Preferred Stock:  The corporation is authorized to issue
40,000,000 shares of Class A Preferred Stock having $0.0001 par value.

C.  Class B Preferred Stock:  The corporation is authorized to issued
40,000,000 shares of Class B Preferred Stock having $0.0001 pare value.

3.  The undersigned declare that they constitute at least two-thirds
of the incorporators (check) ________ or of the board of directors
(check) ___X____

4.  The undersigned affirmatively declare that to the date of this
certificate, no stock of the corporation has been issued.

5.  Signatures:


/s/  James H. Alexander
President

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and remit
the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
<PAGE>   1










                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2

                 GT INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    FOR THE YEAR
                                                                       ENDED
                                                                    DECEMBER 31,
                                                                       1996
                                                                    -----------
<S>                                                                  <C>

Net income                                                           $25,139
                                                                     =======

Weighted average shares outstanding:
    Actual                                                            66,391
    Dilutive impact of shares issued during the period and treated
      as being outstanding throughout the periods presented             --
                                                                     -------
                                                                      66,391
                                                                     -------

Net income per share                                                 $  0.38
                                                                     =======
</TABLE>
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A0 25
13938

#### LILIENTHAL v. SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. AND SIX OTHER CASES

(177 S. E., 98)

*182
      *Messrs. Shimel ■&*Rittenberg, for appellants,

*183
      *Messrs. Hagood, Rivers & Young,*for respondent,

November 7, 1934.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

For the reasons stated by his Honor, Judge Sease, in his order, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Carter and Bonham concur.

Mr. Acting Associate Justice C. T. Graydon did not participate.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

I, Daniel R. DeFazio, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annual report of Velocity Express Corporation;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
        of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
        the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
        statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
        by this report; and

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
        information included in this report, fairly present in all material
        respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
        of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Date:  January 6, 2005

                                        /s/  Daniel R. DeFazio
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Daniel R. DeFazio
                                        Chief Financial Officer
PARTIES TO NEW FORM OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

Philip R. Crimmins, Sr.
John C. Cywinski
Randolph P. Davis
Tamy T. Duplantis
Beverly O. Elving
David. L. Goebel
Kurt Hankins
Sam Rothschild
Rebecca R. Tilden
ex10-2.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE TRANSITION AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made effective this 1st day of October 2010, by and between International Game Technology (the "Company") and Anthony Ciorciari (the "Executive").


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Executive Transition Agreement (the "Transition Agreement") on October 23, 2009; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend and add certain terms to the Transition Agreement.


 


The Company and the Executive agree to amend certain terms of the Transition Agreement.


 



	
1.  

	
Term. The Executive's employment with the Company shall terminate on January 7, 2011.








	
2.  

	
Termination. Executive's termination pursuant to paragraph 1 constitutes "Involuntary Termination" as defined in the Transition Agreement, and the Executive shall be entitled to the Severance Protections as set forth in section 3(a) of the Transition Agreement, all payable in accordance with the Company's normal payroll practices.








	
3.  

	
Effect On Other Provisions. In all other respects, the provision, terms, and conditions set forth in the Transition Agreement shall remain in force and effect.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this First Amendment as of the date set forth in this paragraph.


 





	International Game Technology	Executive
	 	
	 
	 
	 
	By:  ________________________________	 
	 	 
	Its:  President and CEO 	Anthony Ciorciari
TradeOn Inc.: Exhibit 10.18 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com











Exhibit 10.18 


Undertaking the Guaranty Obligations Pre-maturity Covenants between the Parties


Dispute Resolution Validity Acknowledgments by the Guarantors 

Summary of Guaranty Contract 


Undertaking the Guaranty Obligations Pre-maturity Covenants between the Parties Dispute Resolution Validity Acknowledgments by the Guarantors Summary of Guaranty Contract (the “Contract”) entered into
by and between Changzhou Wujin Best Cable Co., Ltd., Wang Kai, and Yao Qing (the “Guarantors”) and Jiangsu Wujin Rural Commercial Bank Company limited by Shares (the “Creditor”) on November 13,
2009


Main Contents:


Guaranty Contract Number: 321882009820018 The Guarantors undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for Changzhou Wujin Kai Kai Lighting Electronics Co., Ltd. (the “Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards the Creditor under the Loan
Agreement (reference no. 321882009020018) from the date of effectiveness of the debt by the Obligor and till two years after the maturity of that loan agreement and the amount secured is RMB 3,000,000. 


Guaranty Responsibility: the guaranty under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantors are obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including the creditor declares
the debt becomes mature in advance by the Creditor under the Loan Agreement or pursuant to law. 


Scope of Guaranty: the guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expense such as litigation cost, lawyer’s fee. 


Guaranty period: the guaranty period is from the effective date of the Contract to two years after the expiration of the performance period under the Loan Agreement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      36,055,000
<SECURITIES>                                31,136,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,265,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            90,301,000
<PP&E>                                      51,094,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,859,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             137,390,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       59,280,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               137,390,000
<SALES>                                    187,174,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           187,174,000
<CGS>                                       80,016,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,016,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,961,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,427,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,534,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,534,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v. 2:17-cr-207-3

Hernan Emilio Caldas-Estupinan 

ORDER

There being no objections, the court hereby adopts the Report

and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 87) that the

defendant’s guilty plea be accepted. The court accepts the

defendant’s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment, and he is

hereby adjudged guilty on that count. The court will defer the

decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the

sentencing hearing.

Date: April 12, 2018 s\James L. Graham 

 James L. Graham

 United States District Judge