alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: 
Pharmacore, Inc.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.33(a) on or before June 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODXL, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for 
hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: 
Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion 
Control (``Deputy Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 
28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on 
February 4, 2015, Pharmacore, Inc., 4180 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway, High 
Point, North Carolina 27265, applied to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Controlled substance                       Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oxymorphine (9652).........................  II
Noroxymorphone (9668)......................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance as 
an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) for clinical trials.

    Dated: April 14, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-09334 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                     

        <S> <C>                            

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND>                     

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM 
FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPT. 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
                                 
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1                       

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997 
<CASH>                             19,402 
<SECURITIES>                            0 
<RECEIVABLES>                           0 
<ALLOWANCES>                            0 
<INVENTORY>                             0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   19,402 
<PP&E>                                  0 
<DEPRECIATION>                          0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     19,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,458 
<BONDS>                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0 
<COMMON>                           63,125 
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       19,402 
<SALES>                                 0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    4,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (4,222) 
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0 
<CHANGES>                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                       (4,222)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.01) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.01)



         

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the City of Albany, Petitioner, v Department of Assessment of the Town of Colonie et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Albany County,

March 16, 1988

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Susan M. Tatro, Town Attorney,*for respondents. *Vincent J. McArdle, Jr., Corporation Counsel (John C. Egan, Jr.,*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lawrence E. Kahn, J.

The above-captioned litigation seeks to review a real property tax assessment pursuant to RPTL article 7. Respondent has moved to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that petitioner failed to timely file a request for judicial intervention (RJI) form with the Special Term Clerk.

The motion shall be denied. Neither the applicable provisions of the RPTL nor the regulations for tax assessment review proceedings in counties outside of the City of New *402York (22 NYCRR 202.59) mandate dismissal upon the failure to file an RJI form. Such requirement is ministerial rather than jurisdictional and should not be utilized to circumvent the real questions at issue. Our system of jurisprudence has historically favored determinations on the merits of the particular litigation *(Matter of Mento,*33 AD2d 650). This philosophy should continue unabated, despite the ever-increasing barrage of forms, rules and bureaucratization of the judicial process.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00446

- CV

Paul Alvarado, Appellant

v.

ZMI Investments LLC, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COUR T AT LAW NO. 1 OF TR AVIS COUNTY NO. C

- 1

- CV

- 19

- 004708 , THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRES IDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant ’s brief was originally due on December 9, 2019

. On March 3, 2020

,

this C ourt sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to

file a satisf

ac tory response by March 13, 2020

, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for

want of p rosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. A pp. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: April 2 , 2020
<PAGE>

      Exhibit 23.2

      INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of United Shipping & Technology, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No.
333-31414), Form S-8 (File No. 333-40230), Form S-8 (File No. 333-30228), Form
S-8 (File No. 333-06269) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-34411) of our report dated
August 13, 1999, relating to the consolidated financial statements of United
Shipping & Technology, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1999 and for the
year then ended, which report appears in this July 1, 2000, annual report on
Form 10-KSB/A of United Shipping & Technology, Inc.

      /s/ LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP

      LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP
      Minneapolis, Minnesota
      July 30, 2001
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-88568, 333-31414, and 333-34411); the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-85606) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 1996
Director Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Stock Option Plan, and certain
1999/2000/2001 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements; the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-40230) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Option Plan; and the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-30228 and 333-06269) pertaining to
the 1996 Director Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Stock Option Plan, of our
report dated December 10, 2004, except for Note 14 as to which the date is
December 21, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Velocity Express Corporation included in its Annual Report.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
December 21, 2004
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

u the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of % per annum, along with costs.

u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

u other:

.

This action was (check one):

u tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

u tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

u decided by Judge on a motion for

.

Date: CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Dayton Public Schools

3:17-cv-338

Lisa Cummings-Elmore, et al.,

✔ ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, OVERRULING DEFENDANT LISA

CUMMINGS-ELMORE=S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE=S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND TO MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT.

✔ Thomas M. Rose

Report and Recommendations

1/12/2018
Exhibit 11

                               Washington Bancorp
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share



                               Twelve Months ended
                                  June 30, 1998
<TABLE>

                                                               Basic EPS   Diluted EPS
                                                               -----------------------
<S>                                                            <C>         <C>    
Computation of weighted average number of
 common  shares outstanding:
Common shares outstanding at the beginning of the .........     651,133      651,133
 period
Unreleased common shares held by the Employee .............     (46,333)     (46,333)
 Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) at the beginning
 to the period
Weighted average common shares released by the ............       2,010        2,010
 ESOP during the period
Weighted average common shares outstanding - ..............        --         16,677
 Stock Option Plan
Weighted average common shares to  fund the ...............          45           45
 Recognition and Retention Plan
Weighted average common shares purchased
 for treasury .............................................      (3,266)      (3,266)
                                                              ---------    ---------  
Weighted average number of common shares ..................     603,589      620,266
                                                              ---------    ---------  
Net income ................................................   $ 822,836      822,836
                                                              ---------    ---------  
Net income per common share ...............................   $    1.36    $    1.33
                                                              =========    =========
</TABLE>
DOCKET NO. __________

IN THE 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

IN RE:

DARRELL CURLEE,

Relator

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND

WRIT OF PROHIBITION

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

Darrell Curlee, Relator, moves this Court to grant him leave to file his

Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition, and shows:

1. Concomitantly with filing of this Motion, Relator is tendering to

the Clerk of the Court his Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of

Prohibition. That Petition is incorporated into this Motion, by reference, for

all intents and purposes, as though set forth herein verbatim.

2. Relator represents that his Petition for Writ of Mandamus

presents an issue of great importance which may be paraphrased as follows:

may a judge ignore a defendant’s Due Process rights and this Court’s

pronouncements of law by tacitly removing appointed counsel on a whim,

1

W5

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 8/28/2015 2:59:37 PM

Accepted 8/28/2015 3:57:24 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 8/28/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK 
without a hearing. 

3. Relator suggests that this issue is of great importance, not only to

him, but to the criminal jurisprudence of Texas.

4. Relator therefore prays that this Honorable Court grant him leave

to file his Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition. Relator

prays for general relief.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Terence Russell 

Terence A. “Tiger” Russell

S.B.O.T. #17437070

1040 E. Elm St.

Hillsboro, Texas 76645

Tel: (254) 580-9282

Fax: (254) 582-5593

tiger_russell@att.net 

Attorney for Relator, Darrell Curlee

L.T. “Butch” Bradt #02841600

14015 Southwest Freeway, Suite 4

Sugar Land, Texas 77478

(281) 201-0700

Fax: (281) 201-1202

ltbradt@flash.net 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned attorney, in accordance with the Rule 9.5, T.R.A.P.,

certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petition was delivered to:

RESPONDENT:

Honorable A. Lee Harris

2
66th Judicial District Court

PO Box 284

Hill County Courthouse

Hillsboro, Texas 76645

(254) 582-4045

STATE:

Mark Pratt, District Attorney

PO Box 400

Hill County Courthouse

Hillsboro, Texas 76645

Phone: (254) 582-4070

Fax: (254) 582-4036 

ADDITIONAL COUNSEL:

Lyle Vincent Gripp

100 N 6th St., Suite 703

Waco, TX 76701

254-756-1112

On August 28, 2015.

/s/ Terence Russell 

Terence A. “Tiger” Russell

3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

CONTRANS CORP., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. OF 

ARIZONA, LLC,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 3:17-cv-00296

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

(by full consent of the parties)

ORDER

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has 

been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as 

to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 

days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.

Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement 

should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994), 

and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between 

the parties, if necessary.

December 13, 2018 s/Sharon L. Ovington

Sharon L. Ovington

United States Magistrate Judge
# Official Journal C 310/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 310 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6213 September 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 310

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6213 September 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 310/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 310/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 310/02 | State aid — Germany — State aid SA.43260 (2015/FC) — Alleged aid to Frankfurt Hahn Airport and Ryanair — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  2
  ) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 310/02

State aid — Germany — State aid SA.43260 (2015/FC) — Alleged aid to Frankfurt Hahn Airport and Ryanair — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  2
  )

2

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

09/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


Lease Agreement







Party A: villager committee of Xigu village, Qingxu County


Party B:Taiyuan Hongxing Carbon Black Co., Ltd







Party A lease the land described below to Party B, Party B will use the land for its 20,000 ton wet production line of carbon black. Two parties reach the following agreements:







1. Land description


Party A agrees to lease the land to Party B for its carbon black production. The land locates in the south of Xigu villiage, and south of Qingdong Road and 12 Nong ,13 Nong 3 Fang, it is 82 meters from the east to the west, and it is 400 meters from the south of 13 Nong 3 Fang to the north. The total land area is 49 Mu, or 32,667 m2.







2. Lease period


It is 50 years from June 2006 to June 2056.







3. Lease fees and payment


 The lease fee is 10,000 RMB per year and shall be paid in December each year (one month’s delay is allowed), a 5% penalty is imposed if it is overdue.







4. Default responsibility


Party B will cease to pay the lease fee if the Party A is the default party and Party A shall bear all the loss incurred. If party B is the default party, it shall pay to the Party A the lease fee calculated on the basis of actual period during which it used the land.







5. This original contract and a duplicate will be given to both Party A and Party B. It will become effective from the date of signing.







Exhibit: the map of land location












Party A (Seal)                              Signature of Person in Charge:

















Party B (Seal)                              Signature of Person in Charge:

















June 14, 2006
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

 

I,Nelson Chai, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofArchipelago Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
|  Date:   May 16, 2005 | /s/  Nelson Chai          |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                            | Nelson  Chai              |
| * *                        | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

STEVEN A. JENKINS,

Case No. 2:17-cv-738

Petitioner, Judge Michael H.Watson

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

V.

NEIL TURNER, WARDEN,

Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

On April 23, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Report and

Recommendation ("R&R") denying Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment, EOF

No. 4, and recommending that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, EOF No. 10, be

granted and that this action be dismissed. Order and R&R, EOF No. 13. Although

the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's

Order and R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have

been filed. Accordingly, the Order and R&R, EOF No. 13, is ADOPTED and

AFFIRMED. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, EOF No. 10, is GRANTED. This

action is hereby DISMISSED.

Petitioner has waived the right to appeal by failing to file objections. See

Thomas v. Am. 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters. 638 F.2d 947 (6th

Cir. 1981). Therefore, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT