alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9060-2]

      ( print page 964)    
*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed December 23, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through January 3, 2022 10 a.m. EST

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20220000, Final, NMFS, FL,*                     Final Amendment 53 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Fishery in the Gulf of Mexico, Review Period Ends: 02/07/2022, Contact: Peter Hood 727-551-5728.                

*EIS No. 20220001, Final, USPS, DC,*                     Next Generation Delivery Vehicle Acquisitions,  Review Period Ends: 02/07/2022, Contact: Davon M. Collins 202-268-4570.                

*EIS No. 20220002, Final, USN, CA,*                     Point Mugu Sea Range,  Review Period Ends: 02/07/2022, Contact: Cory Scott 805-989-0927.                

*EIS No. 20220003, Draft, BLM, UT,*                     Pine Valley Water Supply Project,  Comment Period Ends: 02/22/2022, Contact: Brooklynn Cox 435-865-3073.                

## Amended Notice

*EIS No. 20210172, Draft Supplement, BR, CA,*                     Sites Reservoir Project Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report/Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Comment Period Ends: 01/28/2022, Contact: Vanessa King 916-978-5077.                

Revision to FR Notice Published 11/12/2021; Extending the Comment Period from 01/11/2022 to 01/28/2022.

Dated: January 3, 2022.

Cindy S. Barger,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2022-00082 Filed 1-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### James K. RIDLING v. STATE of Arkansas

702 S.W.2d 811

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered February 10, 1986

*Wayne Emmons*and *John W. Leach,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, James K. Ridling, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, John W. Leach, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.
No. 2948.

#### Wingo *v.*Caldwell.

November Term, 1891.

Action for the recovery of land by plaintiffs as devisees under the will of J. B. Davis against defendant, who claimed under a parol gift from said Davis, and twenty years adverse possession. Defendant having proved declarations of J. B. Davis in support of defendant’s title after the date of the alleged gift, plaintiff was permitted by the Circuit Judge (Kershaw) to prove other declarations of Davis to the contrary during the same period, accompanied by acts, such as building a gin, pasturing stock, contracting to lease the land to another, &c. Alleged error in admitting such testimony in reply was the only question brought before this court.

*S. Wilson,*for appellant. *Dunean $ Sanders,*contra.

The court say : There can be no doubt of the correctness of appellant’s claim that our decisions fully sustain the doctrine that declarations in favor of one’s own title are not admissible in supporting such title. As we gather from the “Case,” the defendant not only sought to prove a gift by parol, accompanied by possession thereunder, but also by at least three witnesses introduced testimony as to declarations made by J. B. Davis subsequent to 1868, the date of the verbal gift. The plaintiff, in reply, proved by Mrs. Dean other declarations of the said J. B. Davis, connected with his acts, or proposed acts. This was not error. *Boozer*v. *Teague,*27 S. C., 319; *Sumner*v. *Murphy,*
      *5992 Hill, 488 ; *Ellen*v. Ellen, 18 S. C., 494.

Judgment affirmed.

April 30, 1892.

OpinioN by

Mr. Justice Pope,
USGS H

Contac

Search

Gulf of Mexico Integrated Science - Suwannee River Basin and Estuary Initiative

Home | Suwannee River Basin and Estuary Initiative 

Suwannee River Drainage Basin 

(View Enlargement)

Suwannee Information Gateway

Visualization Tool

Suwannee Interactive Mapping Syste

Suwannee Map Gallery

Meetings

Publications

Photo Tours

Related Links

In the News

Contact Information 

USGS Florida Integrated Science Center

 In response to the growing number of environmental concerns in the mostly pristine Suwa

basin and the Suwannee River estuary system, the States of Florida and Georgia, the Federal 

government, and other local organizations have identified the Suwannee River as an ecosystem

protection because of its unique biota and important water resources. Organizations with veste

in the region formed a coalition, the Suwannee Basin Interagency Alliance (SBIA), whose goals

promote coordination in the identification, management, and scientific knowledge of the natur

in the basin and estuary. To date, however, an integrated assessment of the physical, biologic

water resources has not been completed. 

 A holistic, multi-disciplinary approach is needed to address the research needs in the basin

estuary and to provide supportive data for meeting management objectives of the entire ecosy

USGS is well situated to focus on the larger concerns of the basin and estuary by addressing s

research questions linking water supply and quality to ecosystem function and health across co

state boundaries. We are interested in developing a strategic plan in cooperation with Federal,

local agencies to identify and implement studies to address the most compelling research issue

management questions, and to conduct fundamental environmental monitoring studies. 

USGS Open-File Report 2005-1210: Suwannee River Basin and Estuary: An Integrated Science Program - Wh

Download PDF

USGS Open-File Report 2004-1198, Suwannee River Basin and Estuary Initiative: Executive Summary. Down

(Get FREE Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Suwannee River Basin and Estuary Initiative - Welcome! Page 1 of 2

http://gulfsci.usgs.gov/suwannee/index.html 7/22/2011
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Gulf of Mexico Integrated Science 

URL of this page is: http://gulfsci.usgs.gov/suwannee/index.html

Comments or questions? Contact: Renee Koenig - Webmaster or 727-803-8747 ext. 3125 

This page last revised: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 @ 01:44 PM (RRK) 

USGS Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Freedom of Information Act | Accessibility 

Suwannee River Basin and Estuary Initiative - Welcome! Page 2 of 2

http://gulfsci.usgs.gov/suwannee/index.html 7/22/2011
#### D. B. ROSS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5308

424 S. W. 2d 168

Opinion delivered February 19, 1968

*Robert W. Faulkner,*for appellant.

*Joe Purcell,*Attorney General; *Don Langston,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

George Rose Smith, Justice.

Ross was charged by information with the crime of false pretenses, in that he borrowed $2,000 from an Arkadelphia bank for the purpose of buying 29 head of cattle, upon which the bank was to have a lien, but he failed to use the money as he had promised to do. He defended the charge upon the ground that the offense in question must be based upon a misrepresentation of an existing or past fact rather than upon* a promise to be performed in the future. The trial court, rejecting that defense, instructed the jury that the misrepresentation can relate to future conduct if it is accompanied by a present intention not to perform the promise. This appeal is from a verdict and judgment finding Ross guilty and sentencing him to imprisonment for one year.

The court lapsed into error, perhaps being misled by the rule that now prevails in civil cases. *Victor*
      *104
      *Broadcasting Co.*v. *Mahur in,*236 Ark. 196, 365 S. W. 2d 265 (1963). On the criminal side, however, we still follow the English role that was adopted in Arkansas more than a century ago: “This, as the authorities show, was clearly not a false pretence within the statute, because, to be such, it must have been of some existing fact and not a pretence that he would do an act which he did not mean to do.” *McKenzie*v. *State,*11 Ark. 594 (1851). The California court’s departure from the great weight of authority on the point is of interest, but we do not find its reasoning persuasive. See *People*v. *Ashley,*42 Cal. 2d 246, 267 P. 2d 271 (1954).

The judgment is reversed, and, since the case has been fully developed, the charge is dismissed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. §§1350)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §§1350),
the undersigned, Mathew McNeally, Chief Executive Officer and
President of Capital Group One, Inc., a Florida corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to his knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended November 30, 2001 of the Company (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                                                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 4, 2003 |  | By: /s/ Mathew McNeallyMathew McNeally
    President, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 1135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ22-8-000]


City of Colton, California; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 29, 2021, City of Colton, California 
submitted its tariff filing: 2022 Transmission Revenue Balancing 
Account Adjustment/Existing Transmission Contracts update, to be 
effective January 1, 2022.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov) 
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last 
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this 
time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency 
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the 
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1979483929ebfbdb8bfb482a4a1a1bea3a591b7b4a3b2ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87c1c2d5c4c8e9ebeee9e2d4f2f7f7e8f5f3c7e1e2f5e4a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll-free, 
(886) 208-3676 or TYY, (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link 
at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail 
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in 
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 18, 2022.

    Dated: January 4, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00190 Filed 1-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
f10k2010ex10xvii_greenchek.htm


Exhibit 10.17


 


AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT


 


AMENDMENT  TO AGREEMENT dated May 14, 2010, between Greenchek Technology Inc. formerly Ridgestone Resources Inc. hereinafter collectively referred to as "Buyer" and Pardeep Sarai, hereinafter collectively referred to as "Seller".


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amended the agreement entered into between them on October 21, 2008 (the "Agreement");


 


WHEREAS, the parties have not completed the performance of all of the terms and conditions of said Agreement; and,


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to now amend said Agreement in order to modify certain terms of the Agreement..


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, it is agreed that the Agreement dated the 21st day of October 2008 is amend in the following particulars:


 


Section 1 of the Agreement is amended partially to amend payment terms to the Shareholder and the following is substituted:


 


Surrender of Shares


 


1. The Shareholder hereby surrenders to the Company the Surrendered Shares by delivering to the Company's attorney herewith a share certificate or certificates representing the Shares, duly endorsed for transfer in blank., notary guaranteed. The Company hereby acknowledges receipt from the Shareholder of the certificates for the sole purpose of retiring the Surrendered Shares. The Shareholder will surrender the Surrendered Shares upon receipt of a Promissory Note from the Company in the amount of $25,000, which represents the outstanding amount owed to the Shareholder. The Promissory Note will carry an interest rate of 11% per annum. and the term of the Promissory Note is one year from May 14, 2010.


 


Section 2 of the Agreement is amended partially to amend retirement terms to the Shareholder and the following is substituted:


 


Retirement of Shares


 


2. The Company agrees, subject to section 3 hereof, to forthwith after the closing of the License Agreement and issuance of Promissory Note to retire the Surrendered Shares which shall become authorized but unissued.


 


All other provisions of the Agreement dated the 21st day of October 2008 shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to Agreement lips been duly executed by the parties this 14th day of May 2010.


 




	Buyer	 
	GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY INC. (Formerly Ridgestone Resources Inc.)
	 	 	 
	
By: 

	/s/ Lincoln Parke	 
	 	Name: Lincoln Parke	 
	 	Title: President and CEO 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Seller	 
	By: 	/s/ Pardeep Sarai	 
	 	Pardeep Sarai
AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) ^PageJl^of2^Page^2N^^r^blic^isclosu^

United States District Court

for the

Southern District ofOhio

United States ofAmerica

V. )

) ^ XT 2:17-cr-00208-001

Dashawn Anthony Rogan Starnes )

Date ofOriginal Judgment: 08/28/2018 ^

Date ofPrevious Amended Judgment: ) Laura E. Byrum

Case No:

USM No: 77097-061

(UseDate of LastAmendedJudgmentifAny) Defendant'sAttorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of[3 the defendant Q the Director ofthe Bureau ofPrisons Q the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction intheterm of imprisonment imposed based ona guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive bythe United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to28U.S.C.

§994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account thepolicy statement setforth at USSG §181.10

andthe sentencing factors setforth in 18U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent thattheyare applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

IZ]dEN1ED. [3GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence ofimprisonment (as reflected in

the lastjudgment issued) of 77 months is reduced to 70 months •

(See Page 2for additionalparts. Complete Parts I andII ofPage 2 when motion isgranted)

Defendant was originally sentenced to 77 months imprisonment on count 1; 84 months imprisonment on count 2,torun consecutively to

counts 1and 3,but concurrently tocount 4;77 months imprisonment oncount 3,torun concurrently toanother counts; and 43 months

imprisonment oncount 4, torun consecutively tocounts I and 2,but concurrently tocount 3.The aggregate sentence for all

the counts was 204 months.

By this order, the sentences onCounts 1and 3 will be reduced to70 months, resulting inanaggregate sentence for allcounts of 197

months.

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions ofthe judgment dated 08/28/2018 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

OrderDate: 02/02/2024 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

Judge's signature

Effective Date: 02/01/2024 Edmund A. Sargus. District Judge

(ifdifferentfrom order date) Printedname and title

Case: 2:17-cr-00208-EAS Doc #: 61 Filed: 02/02/24 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 143
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER
UNIT DATA) EXTRACTED FROM STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE INTERIM PERIOD DECEMBER 30, 1996 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002590
<NAME> STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                       291
<INVENTORY>                                      8,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,842
<PP&E>                                         110,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,296
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,231<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                         167<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,913
<SALES>                                         87,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,475
<CGS>                                           45,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   422
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    617
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       592
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
<FN>
<F1>COMMON - IN DECEMBER 1995 STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. ISSUED COMMON AND
SUBORDINATED UNITS WHICH REPRESENT LIMITED PARTNER INTERESTS. THESE UNITS ARE
CONSIDERED TO POSSESS THE CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMON STOCK AND ARE BOTH INCLUDED
IN THE DETERMINATION OF EPS.
<F2>OTHER-SE - REPRESENTS THE GENERAL PARTNER'S INTEREST IN THE PARTNERSHIP AND
IS CLASSIFIED HERE SINCE IT DOES NOT POSSESS THE RELEVANT CHARACTERISTICS OF
EITHER COMMON OR PREFERRED STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Holdings Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick J. Caruso, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.