alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Russell M. Medford, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/RUSSELL M.
  MEDFORDRussell
      M. MedfordPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  November
      13, 2008

















CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of AtheroGenics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark P. Colonnese, Executive Vice President,
Commercial Operations and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/MARK
      P. COLONNESEMark
      P. ColonneseExecutive
      Vice President, Commercial Operationsand
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:  November
      13, 2008
##### 



FIRST SHARES BANCORP, INC.

Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her
capacity as an officer of First Shares Bancorp, Inc. (First Shares), that, to
his or her knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report of First Shares on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
First Shares.                                                 

|       |  |                   |  |                                                         
|------ |  | ----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: |  | November 14, 2002 |  |                                                         
|      
|       |  |                   |  | /s/ Jerry R. EngleJerry R. Engle
Chief Executive Officer
Case: 1:17-cr-00139-SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 04/18/18 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 87
Case: 1:17-cr-00139-SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 04/18/18 Page: 2 of 7 PAGEID #: 88
Case: 1:17-cr-00139-SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 04/18/18 Page: 3 of 7 PAGEID #: 89
Case: 1:17-cr-00139-SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 04/18/18 Page: 4 of 7 PAGEID #: 90
Case: 1:17-cr-00139-SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 04/18/18 Page: 5 of 7 PAGEID #: 91
Case: 1:17-cr-00139-SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 04/18/18 Page: 6 of 7 PAGEID #: 92
Case: 1:17-cr-00139-SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 04/18/18 Page: 7 of 7 PAGEID #: 93
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

SARA HAWES, individually, and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MACY’S WEST STORES, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 1:17-cv-00754

Judge Timothy S. Black 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Macy’s West 

Stores, Inc., through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves for entry of summary judgment in 

favor of Defendant, and against Plaintiff Sara Hawes, with respect to each of Hawes’ claims. 

Pursuant to LR 7.2(a), the grounds for this Motion and authorities relied upon in support thereof 

are set forth in an accompanying Memorandum. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment in its favor 

with respect to each of Plaintiff’s claims and dismiss those claims with prejudice. 

Case: 1:17-cv-00754-TSB Doc #: 117 Filed: 07/30/21 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 2891
This the 30th day of July, 2021. 

/s/ Beth A. Bryan 

Beth A. Bryan (Ohio Reg. 0082076) 

TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP 

425 Walnut Street, Suite 1800 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

Phone: (513) 381-2838 

Fax: (513) 381-0205 

bryan@taftlaw.com

Jennifer K. Van Zant (pro hac vice) 

NC State Bar No. 21280

Andrew L. Rodenbough (pro hac vice) 

NC State Bar No. 46364

Ryan C. Fairchild (pro hac vice) 

N.C. State Bar No. 47729 

BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON,

HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP 

230 North Elm Street 

2000 Renaissance Plaza 

Greensboro, NC 27401 

Telephone: (336) 373-8850 

Facsimile: (336) 378-1001 

jvanzant@brookspierce.com

arodenbough@brookspierce.com 

rfairchild@brookspierce.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case: 1:17-cv-00754-TSB Doc #: 117 Filed: 07/30/21 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 2892
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system, which will send electronic notification to all counsel of record. 

This the 30th day of July, 2021. 

/s/ Beth A. Bryan 

Beth A. Bryan 

Case: 1:17-cv-00754-TSB Doc #: 117 Filed: 07/30/21 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: 2893
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.3
                                  ------------


                          SHELBOURNE PROPERTIES II, INC.
                          -----------------------------
                          FORM 10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
                          ----------------------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelbourne Properties II, Inc.,
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.


Date:  November 13, 2002                   /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                           ---------------------
                                           Michael L. Ashner
                                           Chief Executive Officer


Date:  November 13, 2002                   /s/ Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                           ----------------------
                                           Carolyn B. Tiffany
                                           Chief Financial Officer
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-11 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 87
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case: 2:17-cv-01120-EAS-KAJ Doc #: 1-11 Filed: 12/20/17 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 88
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Initiatives Corporation
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Michelle Hamilton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      U.S. Energy Initiatives Corporation and will be retained by U.S. Energy
      Initiatives Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.


August
                14, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Michelle
              HamiltonMichelle
              HamiltonChief
              Financial
              Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Velez, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 851]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), rendered August 30, 2001, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray*86 NY2d 10 [1995]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be resolved by the trier of fact *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be afforded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

Immanuel Lee,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17cv705

v. Judge Michael R. Barrett

Samsung Electronic Inc.,

Defendant.

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court upon this Court’s Order to Show Cause (Doc. 21) 

and Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20).

This Court held a status conference on September 19, 2018. Plaintiff—who is 

now proceeding pro se in this matter—failed to appear for the conference. On October 

24, 2018, this Court issued a Show Cause Order why this matter should not be 

dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was notified that the failure to respond to the 

Show Cause Order may result in dismissal of this case. To date, Plaintiff has not 

responded.

In its Motion to Dismiss, Defendant seeks involuntary dismissal of Plaintiff’s 

entire action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff has not 

responded to Defendant’s motion.

“It is well settled that a district court has the authority to dismiss sua sponte a 

lawsuit for failure to prosecute.” Carpenter v. City of Flint, 723 F.3d 700, 704 (6th Cir. 

2013) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 

734 (1962); Carter v. City of Memphis, 636 F.2d 159, 161 (6th Cir. 1980)). 
Accordingly, based on Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and respond to this Court’s 

Show Cause Order, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE; and 

Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20) is 

GRANTED. This matter shall be CLOSED and TERMINATED from the active docket of 

this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Michael R. Barrett

JUDGE MICHAEL R. BARRETT
#### Watson v Employment Security Commission,

No. 90701;

Court of Appeals No. 131422.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

S&S HOLDCO, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

THREE RIVERS PROVIDER 

NETWORK, INC., 

 Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:17-cv-00783

Judge William O. Bertelsman

Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME 

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. 

Having considered this matter fully and being otherwise sufficiently advised, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the Court’s January 8, 2021 (Doc#75) and January 

13, 2021 (Doc#76) Orders are amended as follows:

Plaintiff shall file its motion to compel the deposition testimony of Blaine Pollock by 

February 2, 2021, defendant shall respond by February 17, 2021, and plaintiff shall reply by March 

1, 2021. 

Defendant shall file its motion opposing the extension of the expert deadline by February 

2, 2021, plaintiff shall respond by February 17, 2021, and defendant shall reply by March 1, 2021. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 1:17-cv-00783-WOB-KLL Doc #: 77-1 Filed: 02/01/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 403
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 18603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07382]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8680]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Four Suits of Armor: 100th Anniversary in 2016'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Four Suits of Armor: 100th Anniversary in 
2016,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United 
States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant 
to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The 
Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, OH, from on or about May 1, 2014, 
until on or about April 30, 2017, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 26, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-07382 Filed 4-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

CLIFFORD L. RUCKER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

POLICE OFFICER HARDY, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Case No. 1:17-cv-823

 Judge Timothy S. Black

 Magistrate Judge Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING IN PART THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 36) AND

TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge 

reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 20, 2018, submitted a Report 

and Recommendation. (Doc. 36). Plaintiff filed objections on November 13, 2018. 

(Doc. 38). Defendants The Kroger Limited Partnership I and Tom Holman filed a 

response to Plaintiff’s objections on November 30, 2018. (Doc. 39).

After reviewing the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s objections, and the 

case record, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections are not well-taken. 

When Plaintiff was granted in forma pauperis status in connection with a civil 

complaint on December 12, 2017, Plaintiff was ordered to promptly notify the Court of 

any changes in his address which may occur during the pendency of this lawsuit. (Doc. 

2). On August 6, 2018 and September 14, 2018, mail containing the Magistrate Judge’s 
2

July 7, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30) and this Court’s Order Adopting that 

Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) addressed to Plaintiff were returned by the Post 

Office marked as “Return to sender – Not deliverable as addressed – Unable to forward.” 

(Docs. 31, 34). On October 11, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order to Plaintiff to 

show cause why his case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution within fifteen 

(15) days of that Order. (Doc. 35)

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo 

all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in 

its entirety as the Court finds that Plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed for want of 

prosecution with prejudice. 

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1) Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED with prejudice for want of 

prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is terminated in this 

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

1/15/19
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald D. Schiefelbein, Chief Financial Officer of Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (a) | the Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related interpretations; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*     *     *



|      |  |                           
|----- |  | --------------------------
|By:   |  | /s/ Gerald D. Schiefelbein
|      |  | Gerald D. Schiefelbein    
|      |  | Chief Financial Officer   
|      | 
|Date: |  | November 12, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

NORTH AMERICAN DISMANTLING

CORP.,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Case No. 2:17-cv-809
CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers

AEP GENERATION RESOURCES, INC.,
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Proceeding Pending
Arbitration, (ECF No. 38). For good cause shown, the parties’ Motion (ECF No. 38) is

GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the above-captioned case is STAYED pending the conclusion

of arbitration.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4-17-3019 aN
DATE EDM . SARGUS, JR.

CHI TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE