alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dennis L. Mast, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of HydroFlo, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15-(e)) for the registrant and have:

        a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

        b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

        a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 6, 2005     /s/ DENNIS L. MAST
                          Dennis L. Mast
                          Chief Executive Officer
```
#### Jesse Ray WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas

703 S.W.2d 459

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered February 18, 1986

*Cross, Kearney & McKissic,*by: *Jesse L.*Kearney, for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Jesse Ray Williams, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Jesse L. Kearney, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Organic Soils.com, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray L.
Smith,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



                         By: /s/ Ray L. Smith
                         ----------------------
                         Ray  L.  Smith
                         Chief  Financial  Officer
                         September  16,  2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
v. ) Civil Action No. 99

- 2496 (PLF) ) PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., et al ., ) ) Defendant s
. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER # 12 7

– REMAND : CHANGE OF COURTROOM
On June 13 , 2022, the Court set a hearing to consider and approve the parties’ jointly proposed consent order t o govern the corrective

- statements remedy at the point of sale (the “Proposed Point

- of

- Sale Consent Order”). See Minute Order (June 13, 2022); see also
Order # 125

– Remand (“Order #125”) [Dkt. No. 6503] (setting forth the procedures for the

“ Point

- of

- Sale Settlement Hearing ”). 1 T h e Court will conduct t he Point

- of

- Sale Settlement Hearing on July 28, 2022, beginning at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) ; and the hearing will continue if necessary on July 29, 2022, beginning at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Dayli ght Time). The
Court now informs the parties and other interested persons that the hearing location has changed.
The Point

- of

- Sale Settlement Hearing will not take place in the Ceremonial Courtroom. Instead,

1 The parties are the United States and the Public Health Intervenors (collectively , “ p laintiffs”); Philip Morris USA Inc., Altria Group, Inc., and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (individually, as successor in interest to Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and as successor to Lorillard Tobacco Company) (collectively , “ d efendants”); and ITG Brands, LLC, Commonwealth Brands, Inc., and Commonwealth

- Altadis, Inc. ( collectively , the “ r emedies p arties”). D efendants and the Remedies Parties are collectively referred to as the

“ m anufacturers.”2 it will be held in Courtroom 30 of the William B. Bryant Annex to the E. B arrett Prettyman
Courthouse at 333 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001. All other procedures set forth in the Court’s July 21, 2022 order shall remain in full force and effect. See Order #126–
Remand: Procedures for Settlement Hearing [Dkt. No. 6511]. Due to the change of courtroom, however, those participating virtually will now be able to view exhibits and demonstratives displayed in court.
SO ORDERED.

_______________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge
DAT E: July 27, 2022 /s/
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4327 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4327

 To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the good time 
          credit toward service of sentences of imprisonment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the good time 
          credit toward service of sentences of imprisonment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prisoner Incentive Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. GOOD TIME CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 3624(b)(1) of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``, beyond the time served, of up to 54 
days at the end of each year of the prisoner's term of imprisonment, 
beginning at the end of the first year of the term,'' and inserting 
``of up to 54 days for each year of the prisoner's sentence imposed by 
the court,''.
    (b) Restoration of Credit.--Section 3624(b)(1) is amended by 
striking the sentence beginning ``Credit that has not been earned'' and 
inserting ``The Bureau may subsequently restore any or all credit 
previously denied, based on the prisoner's maintaining good behavior as 
determined by the Bureau.''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section apply with 
respect to each prison sentence that has not been completed before the 
date of the enactment of this Act, except any sentence imposed before 
November 1, 1987.
                                 <all>
```
!"#

	

$# %	% !&'() )

*

+,-./012345677,08019/:;68/7 <

=#>?%@A
=#>%?B +,-./012345677,08CDEFGHIEJKIGLMMNOPQPRS T	
# 
	

		

!
		

U
	
#
	
# 
 

	


>V 

	%WU
 X

X  ! !
 X
	V
		
	 
! 
X

X

!	 


!!
%

 
	V#

!
 
!!

	V	
> >VX
	
V ># 




!

	
	
% T	
 	U  
# 


!

		




V	 
!	

!


%  X
	
# 


!



	#
 

!V
	!	 !




X
 X

	!% 
V

	

#!


 !
!
 

X

X 
	





%T	
!Y
	
!

	


		





# 

X
 

	 !X

!
!

%T	 
	# 


	


 X
	
!


X
	!



	 !
 !%T	#Z!


	


X
	
X

		 !
X#  

 !

V	!	#
!
V	!	 
!
% [50.,\,/6;]^/,087CDEFGHIEJKIGLMMNOPQP_S 

!
``)?%

	a	WX
	b
T
	#! 
	
 X ! 

! 
X


X


X	#


!
X #



	
 V!
!

%c

	!
Xd #

e	 #!


	

!

	! 
	 !

 

	!
!
% %a#
!



!	X!	X

X! !X
	
 !

X! 
# !

!
!
% %T	

!!
!
!

	

>
	! 	

	 


	

	


	% `%T	





	

	% )%
	Y


	Y


! 
% ?%f 


  !! 
	 
!!
	


! 
X !!
	
X !X
# !% @%f 

 !
gV
g!
 
%

h,ij,k8,l657,/m[0n,^mo,\5i5m a

! 

 !!



p

q

V. Compl. Ex. 04 at 001
 	





 !"#

	

$# %	% !&'() )

%* !!
% (%+


 + +
#
++
!

!
 #
!!
  

# ,% -%. 
! ,
	!




! 
 !
	 , 
!


!! !

!

	
% %/#
!


	

 ,

	! 


!% %

+ +,+!	! %0,
 

+!+#1!
!# 

 !
	! 	
	2!
!  

,2+!+,% 3 	 ,




	
#
!
!
 

+

+ 
	





#1!


	 !% 4	
 1


	#  



	 ##
	
! 
#+ 

+
	


!	
!
!

! 

!
%0#
 
	
!
,	# 
	#  



	#!  ! 
,
	
	


! !	

	!
!
! 

!
%3


#


	


	 !	

! 

!


	


 !
  +		 	 $%5
+
!
+
	





	!

!
	
#! ,#  



!	!

!!%3
	


	
 
		



+		 	 

	
 !

	


	
#!
	!+!

 
+
 
	 

	 !

!% % !


 

	
 !
	/

!

	6!



0

,	 		#  

, 7#, ##!
 
,
	
	 

% 89:;<=>9?@ABC>A<;=>A:DEFGHIJFKLJHMNNOPQRQST 0

,	 


	
	#
#1!


! %*! !


! !	+

	
%!	 ##1!

! !
%6
 #1!

! !
%0
,	 

	 !#
 1!


 
#
 !%

0UV  /W

V,

	,
 !"#

EILXYZ[N\]Y]I^ _NF]YI V. Compl. Ex. 04 at 002
 	





 !"#

	

$# %	% !&'() *)

+( ,!!# -!	  ! ,!


./ ,!

0 -
 12
! + !!
 !!




 -
 12
! + !!
 !!
 

 , !	 

  !-	
3 456789:;<:=>:?@AB:CDEFGGA:HICBA@B@A?@JE K3/LM,,LK",N3K/%

OPQRSPTUVPWXYZU[UPV

V. Compl. Ex. 04 at 003
 	





 !"#

	

$# %	% !&'() )) V. Compl. Ex. 04 at 004
**Exhibit31.2**

** **

Certificationof Chief Financial Officer

 

I, Nelson Chai, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Archipelago Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 9,  2004 | /s/ Nelson Chai            |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                          | Nelson Chai                |
| * *                      | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Southern District of Ohio

Doc Halo, LLC

1:17-cv-137

TigerText, Inc.

TigerText, Inc.

c/o Brad Brooks, Registered Agent

2110 Broadway

Santa Monica, CA 90404

Donnell Bell

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

425 Walnut Street, Suite 1800

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

03/03/2017

Case: 1:17-cv-00137-MRB Doc #: 3 Filed: 03/03/17 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 45
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

1:17-cv-137

0.00

Case: 1:17-cv-00137-MRB Doc #: 3 Filed: 03/03/17 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 46
#### Greoge Lee Tatum *v.*K. W. Rester

5-4106

412 S. W. 2d 293

Supplemental opinion on denial of rehearing delivered March 27, 1967

[Original opinion delivered February 20, 1967,

241 Ark. 1059.]

Paul Wabd, Justice.

In a petition for rehearing the appellee insists that, under the rules governing the liability of an owner or occupier of land, he was under no duty to exercise ordinary care for the appellant’s safety until he knew or reasonably should have known that the appellant was. in a position of danger. On this basis it is contended that our original opinion in the case at bar is in conflict with Paragraph B of AMI 1106, which is said by counsel to be a correct statement of the law.

We adhere to our opinion. When the condition of the premises has no ca sal connection whatever with the injury to the plaintiff, the status of the defendant as. an owner or occupier of land is irrelevant. We agree with the view expressed by the Supreme Court of Washington in *Potts*v. *Amis,*62 Wash. 2d 777, 384 P. 2d 825. There the plaintiff was a guest at the defendant’s summer home. In attempting to demonstrate the correct use of a golf club the defendant struck and injured the plaintiff. The *272condition of the premises obviously had no bearing upon the cause of the plaintiff’s injury. Hence the court was, we think, correct in making this declaration of law: “The mere fortuitous circumstance that this injury occurred -while the plaintiff stood upon land belonging to the defendant should not relieve the latter of liability.” For the contrary view, with which we disagree, see *Cochran*v. *Abercrombie,*Fla. App., 118 So. 636, 79 A. L. R. 2d 986.

In the case at bar the condition of the premises had no *causal*connection with the appellant’s injury. His hand was mashed against a man-made post, but the same thing would have happened if the obstruction had been a tree or other harmless object. Hence the court should have instructed the jury upon the rule of ordinary care as in the *Linxwiler*case, cited in our original opinon, Avhere, as here, the condtion of the premises had nothing to do with the accidental injury.

We do not now pass upon the accuracy of Paragraph B of AMI 1106 except to point out that it should not be given when, as in the case at bar, there is no relationship between the plaintiff’s cause of action and the condition of the premises. There is no reason for us now to speculate upon whether or not a fact- situation might arise which would justify the trial court in giving Paragraph B of AMI 1106.

Rehearing denied.
#### Willie Ray MACKEY v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 85-83

690 S.W.2d 353

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered June 3, 1985

*Q. Byrum Hurst, Jr.,*for petitioner.

*189
      *Steve Clark,*Att’y Gen., by: *Theodore Holder,*Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Willie Ray Mackey was charged with capital felony murder and found guilty by a jury of first degree murder. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. We affirmed. *Mackey*v. *State,*279 Ark. 307, 651 S.W.2d 82 (1983). Petitioner now seeks permission to proceed in circuit court for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37. The sole ground for relief is that he was denied a fair trial as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States because the jury at his trial was “death qualified.”

This Court has held that death-qualified juries are constitutional. *Rector*v. *State,*280 Ark. 385, 659 S.W.2d 168 (1983); *Hendrickson*v. *State,*285 Ark. 462, 688 S.W.2d 295 (1985). Even if we had not so held, petitioner is not entitled to raise the issue now for the first time. An issue which could have been raised at trial and on the record on direct appeal in accordance with the controlling rules of procedure is considered waived, unless it presents a question so fundamental as to render the judgment void. *Hill*v. *State,*278 Ark. 194, 644 S.W.2d 282; *Collins*v. *State,*271 Ark. 825, 611 S.W.2d 182 (1981); *Moore*v. *Illinois,*408 U.S. 786 (1972); *Stembridge*v. *Georgia,*343 U.S. 541 (1952); *Hulsey*v. *State,*268 Ark. 312, 595 S.W.2d 934, reh. denied, 268 Ark. 315, 599 S.W.2d 729 (1980); *Williams*v. *Edmondson,*257 Ark. 837, 250 S.W.2d 260 (1975); *Orman*v. *Bishop,*245 Ark. 887, 435 S.W.2d 440 (1968). The question advanced by petitioner is not sufficient to render the judgment in his case void.

Petition denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Strategic 
Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC, 
pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention 
and Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--PAR 18-812, NIOSH Member 
Conflict Review.
    Date: February 23, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m., EST.
    Place: Teleconference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Michael Goldcamp, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Programs, National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 1095 Willowdale 
Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, Telephone: (304) 285-5951, 
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e636941424a4d4f435e6e4d4a4d00494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5f8f2dad9d1d6d4d8c5f5d6d1d69bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2021-28521 Filed 1-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>